---

UNITED STATES 
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB

(Mark One)

[X] Annual Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(D) Of The
Securities Exchange Act Of 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008

[ ] Transition Report Under Section 13 Or 15(D) Of The
Securities Exchange Act Of 1934

For the transition period from _____to _____

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-28259

DESTINY MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES
INC.(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

|COLORADO                                                             | 84-1516745                          
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
      organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|                                                                     |                                     
|570 Granville Street, Suite 800                                      |                                     
|Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada                                  | V6C 3P1                             
|(Address of principal executive offices)                             | (Zip Code)                          

604-609-7736Issuer's telephone number

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
NOT APPLICABLE

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.001 PERSHARE

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response
to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure
will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ]

State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year:
$1,578,888

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting
common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which
the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common
equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of
affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) $9,220,256 as of November 18
,2008

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date. 51,223,647
Shares of Common Stock as of November 18, 2008

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):
Yes [ ] No [X]

---

|DESTINY MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
|-------------------------------
|FORM 10-KSB                    
|                               
|INDEX                          

|           |                                                                                                                        | PAGE
|---------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----
|PART I     |                                                                                                                        |     
|Item 1.    | Description Of Business.                                                                                               | 3   
|Item 2.    | Description Of Property.                                                                                               | 10  
|Item 3.    | Legal Proceedings.                                                                                                     | 11  
|Item 4.    | Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security Holders.                                                                   | 11  
|PART II    |                                                                                                                        |     
|Item 5.    | Market For Common Equity And Related Stockholder Matters.                                                              | 12  
|Item 6.    | Management's Discussion And Analysis Or Plan Of Operation.                                                             | 12  
|Item 7.    | Financial Statements.                                                                                                  | 20  
|Item 8.    | Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting
      And Financial Disclosure.                            | 21  
|Item 8A    | Controls and Procedures                                                                                                | 21  
|Item 8B    | Other Information                                                                                                      | 22  
|PART III   |                                                                                                                        |     
|Item 9.    | Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters And Control Persons;
      Compliance With Section 16(A) Of The Exchange Act. | 22  
|Item 10.   | Executive Compensation.                                                                                                | 25  
|Item 11.   | Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management.                                                        | 27  
|Item 12.   | Certain Relationships And Related Transactions                                                                         | 29  
|Item 13.   | Exhibits And Reports On Form 8-K.                                                                                      | 30  
|Item 14.   | Principal Accountant Fees and Services                                                                                 | 31  
|Signatures |                                                                                                                        | 32  

1

---

PART I

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties,
including statements regarding Destiny Media's capital needs, business strategy
and expectations. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of
historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. In some cases,
you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may",
"will", "should", "expect", "plan", "intend", "anticipate", "believe",
"estimate", "predict", "potential" or "continue", the negative of such terms or
other comparable terminology. Actual events or results may differ materially. In
evaluating these statements, you should consider various factors, including the
risks outlined below, and, from time to time, in other reports Destiny Media
files with the SEC. These factors may cause Destiny Media's actual results to
differ materially from any forward-looking statements. Destiny Media disclaims
any obligation to publicly update these statements, or disclose any difference
between its actual results and those reflected in these statements. The
information constitutes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

CURRENCY

All dollar amounts in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB are
presented in United States dollars unless otherwise indicated.

2

---

|ITEM 1. | DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.
|------- | ------------------------

OVERVIEW AND CORPORATE BACKGROUND

Destiny Media Technologies, Inc. was incorporated in August
1998 under the laws of the State of Colorado. We carry out our business
operations through our wholly owned subsidiary, Destiny Software Productions
Inc., a British Columbia company that was incorporated in 1992, and MPE
Distribution, Inc. a Nevada company that was incorporated in 2007. The
Company, Destiny or we refers to the consolidated activities of all three
companies.

Our principal executive office is located at #800-570 Granville
Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3P1. Our telephone number is (604)
609-7736 and our facsimile number is (604) 609-0611.

Our common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin board under the
symbol DSNY and on various German exchanges (Frankfurt, Berlin, Stuttgart and
Xetra) under the symbol DME 935 410.

Our corporate website is located at http://www.dsny.com.

Destiny develops and markets software tools and services which
enable media owners to securely distribute their digital content globally
through the internet. Examples of digital content include: audio, video,
pictures, documents and software. The company has two main product lines: MPE®
enables content to be transferred permanently to authorized recipients.
Clipstream® is analogous to radio or TV where content is streamed to the viewer
in a transient manner.

MPE® enables the secure download of audio or video to a users
computer. Content can either be locked to a recipient computer or it can be left
in an unlocked format, but marked with a digital watermark that identifies
copies. MPE® products include PODDS, an online music store with content licensed
from the major record labels, a solution for distributing content securely to
internet accessible jukeboxes and Play MPE®, a system for securely moving
pre-release music to radio stations, media, buyers and other trusted
recipients.

The Play MPE® system is in regular use by all four major record
labels (Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, EMI and Sony BMG).

The MPE® group of products is based on two pending patents. The
first Digital Media Distribution Method and System(US 20020146122,
WIPO 01/65796) was allowed by the USPTO in October 2008 and a patent grant is
expected by February 2009. The second Methods for Watermarking Media
Data (US 20080098022) was published in April 2008 and is expected to be
considered by the USPTO in fiscal 2009. The first patent covers a number of
methods, including the ability to secure transfer of content over peer to peer
networks and the ability to lock content to authorized recipient computers. The
second is an innovative new technique for embedding tracking information into
the media file, so the source of illegal copies can be identified. The Company
anticipates licensing opportunities outside of Destinys core product lines for
the watermarking technology when the patent is granted, as it is inaudible and
nearly impossible to remove, but can reliably identify the person that made the
first copy of the content even if the copy is not in a digital format.

All Destiny technologies are developed by internal staff, are
proprietary and are owned by the Company. Aside from these two pending patents,
the Company has developed a number of technologies and algorithms that are trade
secrets. Examples include asynchronous video compression which enables quick
playback in a low resource environment and the implementation of variable
bitrate audio compression so that large audio files can be transferred quickly
without any reduction in audio quality.

The Clipstream® software suite enables audio or video content
to be streamed so that the media plays instantly and automatically when the
user initiates playback. Creating streaming video content with other
technologies can be a complicated process and in most cases, users are required
to purchase and maintain streaming servers. With Clipstream®, content owners
simply encode the content into the Clipstream® format, then upload to an
existing website. Clipstream® is a standards based technology built around Sun
Microsystems Java engine. Because Java is included in most operating systems
and browsers, Clipstream® encoded content will play instantly. This means that a
much higher percentage of potential viewers successfully see the content by
using Clipstream® than with other solutions. Clipstream® users are not required
to download third party player software which can create instabilities and allow
unsafe external access to the users computer.

3

---

Clipstream products include internet television, live and on
demand audio and video, an internet radio network and custom solutions for the
advertising and market research verticals.

A new Clipstream® solution is under development that expands
the brand to provide hosting, reporting and secure transfer of any media content
type. Audio and video will automatically be converted to the Clipstream® format.
Users will receive their own website and the ability to easily share content by
either embedding it into other websites or by using integrated email server
functionality.

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

From 2004 through 2007, we invested in the development and
marketing of the Play MPE® system in the United States, distributing a total of
60,000 tracks. This system enables our clients, the record labels, to securely
distribute pre-release music to trusted third parties including radio stations,
VIPs, TV and movie producers, reviewers, publicity, DJs, online retail and
buyers. In 2008, we distributed an additional 40,000 tracks through Play MPE®
for a cumulative total of over 100,000 tracks and over 100 million
deliveries.

Fiscal 2008 was the year where we successfully transitioned the
Play MPE® system from trial stage into commercial usage in the United States and
portions of Europe and saw the beginning of revenue growth from Play MPE®.

In the early part of fiscal 2008, we began an aggressive six
month campaign to expand awareness of the Play MPE® system directed at station
managers and program directors. Campaigns were focused on integrating the Play
MPE® system into their daily routine . Five staff traveled the country, visiting
every major market radio station as ads ran in nearly every issue of every major
industry publication. This campaign was effective and helped the system increase
download numbers providing labels with the confidence to send releases digitally
only and contributed to our success in reaching commercial agreements with our
clients. Highlights of the campaign included a series of spoof ads where top
label talented appeared for free to voluntarily endorse their preferred
solution.

We began phasing out trial usage on January 1, 2008 and by
August 31, 2008, unpaid trials had ended completely. During the year, EMI and
Warner Music Group, joined Universal Music Group as our major label clients.
Several sub-labels of Sony BMG individually went to paid agreements or utilize
the system on a pay-as-you-go basis. Additionally, we have signed in excess of
150 agreements with major independent labels and management companies
representing hundreds of sub-labels.

Commercial usage in Europe began in the fourth quarter when
several contracts were signed covering Sweden, Norway and Denmark, including
contracts with UMG Sweden, Warner Music Sweden and Sony BMG Sweden. The
conversion in these countries was rapid due to the nature of the relationships
between radio and the record labels in those jurisdictions. With an established
network in the United States and northern Europe, Play MPE® is well positioned
to expand to additional European countries, Latin America, Asia and Australia
where trials were well underway at year end. Since year end we have begun to
reach agreements in Australia.

Revenue growth will be tied to increasing the number of
recipients and transactions to those recipients. As labels distribute to their
own staff and staff at sister labels, we have been able to expand
internationally without direct marketing into those territories. Additionally,
we have embedded links to our system throughout the popular Mediabase reporting
system, which is used by radio and labels on a daily basis, encouraging users to
request that they be added as recipients. We are building out the size and
number of our own custom lists and are exploring pricing models to encourage
labels to select more recipients.

We have structured the Play MPE® system such that record labels
have the ability to encode and manage the distribution of their content. Each
customer has the ability to use our list of recipients and manage their own list
of recipients and send with no needed involvement from our staff. Rapid growth
in usage of Play MPE® can be accommodated with minimal requirement for added
resources. We have discovered that the record labels prefer this flexibility.

In many labels, songs are delivered in parallel by physical CD.
This is being phased out due to economic pressures and the availability and
awareness of Play MPE®. Management expects the growth of Play MPE® to continue
throughout 2009 and thereafter as we increase usage with current customers,
increased sends to recipients beyond radio, increased awareness, the elimination
of CD distributions, and through expanded geographic usage. We also expect that
Play MPE® will be utilized more frequently for music video distributions.

4

---

In anticipation of significant growth we have implemented a
reorganization of the server infrastructure to accommodate a much larger volume
of simultaneous player and encoder access, reliable backups, load balancing and
high availability. English and Spanish versions are currently available for the
player software, while a template driven system will easily accommodate new
language additions. The system continues to evolve and will enable the addition
of facilities in other locations, with higher availability and real time
failover if one facility goes down. We have adapted the database system such
that localized adjustments to a distribution can be done easily which we expect
will catalyze global expansion and increased usage per track.

Reliable international customer service is imperative for
global expansion and that brings challenges of foreign language support and
expanded hours of business associated with the expanded time zones of our
customers. To accommodate this need, we purchased a Nortel Business
Communications Manager 400 phone system which supports multiple phone numbers
and voice mail systems and which allows remote staff to be reached by extension
using VOIP. It also supports hunt groups, so that the system can try various
extensions to ensure the customer gets a live human. In addition to in house
support staff, the company maintains an outside call center to provide 24 hour x
7 day support to our customers. Customers call into a global toll free number,
which terminates at our office, which then connects them automatically with
either the call center or internal staff, depending on time of day. All support
staff have access to an audited web based system that allows them to securely
update passwords, reset accounts, etc. Systems are in place to handle
anticipated international support volumes as usage grows.

We invested heavily in development of both product lines. A new
encoder and database system for Play MPE® has been in development since late
2006. This rewrite of the framework facilitates global expansion of the system.
We currently have two server facilities, both in Vancouver. The new system will
accommodate additional facilities in other locations, with higher availability
and real time failover if one facility goes down. Other features include the
ability to encode assets once, forward them to other jurisdictions where they
can be localized with appropriate local marketing materials, then sent with
local encoder accounts to local users. Server and other infrastructure have been
built out to handle anticipated global transaction volumes. A team of five
continues to finalize this new system, expected to roll out in fiscal 2009.

In February, we launched a Direct to Web system. Though most
recipients prefer the Play MPE® player with its integrated playback, play list
management, CD burning and integration into third party radio station automation
systems, some recipients have expressed interest in this feature. This system
utilizes our proprietary watermarking technology. Recipients can stream the
content using Clipstream® previews or securely download using our playerless
secure web technology. Management believes this added system will expand the
recipients for each distribution, increase revenue and provide an additional
barrier to entry should any significant competitive threat arise.

Another team of developers has been building out a new hosted
solution for Clipstream®. This automated system will allows users to upload any
content, with audio and video automatically converted into the Clipstream®
format. Content hosted on our server farms can be embedded into other sites,
shared via email or accessed directly from a Clipstream® branded website. Users
will optionally have access to You Tube style related content from both their
own site and other sites and they will be able to control access, sharing and
reporting of their content. Because Clipstream® uses up to 90% less bandwidth
than other solutions, we expect the recurring revenue from this system will be
high margin. The system will be initially marketed to our Play MPE® customers
who have expressed interest in our assistance with hosting their rich media
content.

While the new Clipstream® system was under development, we
focused on licensing the technology to high value customers that need the
benefit of Clipstream® security, high playrate and reliability. Our custom
market research solutions were featured at the CASRO market research trade show
in October 2007 and market research continues to be a major vertical for the
solution. In November 2007, Clipstream® Internet TV products were featured at
the Video on the Net Conference. Two representatives are dedicated to selling
Clipstream® and most current sales are through existing customers and incoming
leads from search engine advertising. Management believes that when the higher
margin hosted solution launches, we will re-invest Clipstream® profits into
quickly growing this business unit with investments in marketing and expanding
sales and support resources. The marketing plan will be to rollout to existing
Clipstream® customers and leads, MPE® customers and to grow the system virally
by encouraging single sales to single employees in a corporation, then expanding
that usage throughout the organization. High margin verticals that will be
targeted will include the advertising market, where Clipstream® results in a 10%
higher playrate and at least a 90% savings in bandwidth over competing solutions
and asset management solutions for businesses.

5

---

OUR PRODUCTS

A) MPE® Suite of Products

MPE® products are powered by two patent pending technologies
that give content owners a choice of either locking their content so securely to
a recipient machine that it is impossible to copy or giving the end user the
ability to copy, but putting a forensic trace into the content that tracks where
illegal copies originate. The first patent received an allowance in October and
is expected to be granted during our second quarter of fiscal 2009. The second
patent was published in April and is expected to be considered by the USPTO by
the end of fiscal 2009.

The initial focus for MPE® has been on the music industry, but
the security can be expanded to perform as digital shrinkwrap to secure other
content types. Already, the music industry uses the system to deliver graphics,
videos, documents and other non audio content types.

MPE® products include:

Play MPEä: over 1,000 record labels use this service to deliver
pre-release music and music videos to trusted recipients including radio station
program directors, music buyers, record label staff and the media. Over 100,000
songs have been sent through this system. http://www.plaympe.com

MyPlayMPE: a self service system for smaller independents to
distribute music and music videos through Play MPE® http://www.myplaympe.com

PODDS: a complete software suite to set up to securely sell
music online. Includes encoding modules, accounting modules and the player
software. This software can be utilized in an OEM agreement to set up third
party online music stores. In addition, Destiny has set up its own store to sell
music to commercial users in Canada (DJs, online jukeboxes, etc.) Destiny has
an encoded catalog of 12,000 songs and album artwork under license from the four
major record labels in Canada. http://www.podds.ca

The Play MPE® system, which represented most of the Companys
revenue in 2008, enables a content owner to securely move electronic files
(song, videos etc.) through the Internet to a trusted end user.

Record labels use our encoder tool to manage lists of potential
recipients or send using our proprietary recipient lists. Because sub-labels are
often operated to compete with one another, list security is important, even
within the same company. An extensive system has been built to manage lists and
to interact with partner lists.

Music labels can access the original content from CDs, from the
local hard drive or from a LAN based music repository. They check off the
recipients from the list management system and whether the system should send an
email by preview. They set rights for the users, including whether the user has
to play the song on the recipient computer or if it can be exported to a
portable device. They set the times for any previews to go out and when the song
should show up in the system.

When the song is released, it is automatically encoded in a
preview format and a high quality compressed format. The compressed format
retains all of the audio fidelity of the original in a fraction of the file
size. The system achieves this by allocating bits on a variable basis, so that
if a song gets busy, it allocates more bits, but when the song becomes less
complex, fewer bits are required.

The compressed file is then sent to our server with the
attached song data and artwork, where it resides in a database.

If this is the first time a user has been serviced with a song,
the system will automatically send an email invitation with instructions to
download our player software.

Users can configure their experience with the system, including
merging various email accounts into a single ID and setting email preferences.
At the users request, email previews can be restricted to one per day, week or
month in the form of a digest. Otherwise, if a preview is selected by the label,
an email will automatically go out at the specified date and time alerting the
recipient of a new song. This email preview can feature a Clipstream® stream of
the song embedded directly in

6

---

the email, album cover graphics, promotional materials and
instructions for accessing the song. This combination of our valuable
technologies provides exceptional significant appeal to the use of the Play MPEä
system.

When the recipient launches the player or accesses through
Direct to Web, they are presented with a list of label logos that have made
songs available to them. The order of the icons is dependent on the order that
the user was serviced with new music.

Under each label, they see the tracks that are available for
them on our server. From this screen, they can listen to a high quality stream,
look at album graphics and promotional information, provide feedback to the
label or download the song locally to their machine.

Songs are downloaded in the background using our download
manager and each song is encrypted securely with a key generated based on that
particular authorized computer. If the song is passed on to another computer, it
will not play.

If the user has export rights, they can drag the song into a
playlist which they can burn to CD using our integrated low level CD burning
software or export directly into the standard digital software systems used at
radio stations. As the song is exported, we embed our proprietary digital
watermark into the song.

The watermark is a technology we developed which alters the
music into a subtle way that embeds the ID of the user who created the exported
file. If the song is copied, the labels can tell who made the first copy.

The recipients interaction with the song is monitored,
providing valuable data reporting back to the label.

B) Clipstream® Suite of Products

Clipstream® enables users to experience internet audio and
video directly inside an email or web page. Competing technologies require users
to download, install and configure a player. Users that havent downloaded the
player cant access the content. Because the Clipstream® player is a Java applet
and because Java is natively supported by most email and web browser clients,
Clipstream® content will play instantly for 98% of the audience. The content
will play directly within an email or web page rather than in a separate window.
This makes Clipstream® uniquely well suited for applications where reach is
important. For example, media companies can take video content intended for
television and repurpose it in web pages and emails, and market research
companies can get a much higher response rate.

Content is converted into the proprietary Clipstream®
compression format using the Clipstream® encoder software which we provide for
free. The content owner purchases a code key from us that enables the content to
play. Code keys are limited to a period of time.

Our software applications will work on most Java based
computers, set top boxes and wireless devices which have enough CPU and memory
to play back the content. In addition, our Clipstream® software enables
streaming media to be delivered to users regardless of the operating system of
the users computer.

Our Clipstream® software products incorporate the following
features that we believe give our products advantages over products offered by
competitors:

| | 1. | Web pages, e-mails, banner advertisements and other
      Internet applications that incorporate our Clipstream® software enable
      users to play the media instantly without the requirement of an additional
      player program.                                                                                                                                                
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | 2. | Our customers are able to achieve up to a 90% reduction
      on bandwidth costs for streaming delivered using our products versus
      competing streaming solutions. For advertising solutions, the savings can
      be much higher as Clipstream® only plays when clicked, whereas competing
      solutions download every time, even when ad click rates are less than
      2%.
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | 3. | The Clipstream® software enables streaming through
      firewalls and proxies that may block competing streaming
  solutions.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | 4. | The Clipstream® software is compatible with database
      protocols and non-personal computer devices such as PDAs, wireless and
      set top boxes that support Java.                                                                                                                                                                                                              

7





---

| | 5. | The look and feel can be tightly integrated into a web
      page and most aspects of the engine can be accessed via
  Javascript.                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | 6. | Our customers do not require a server to deliver
      pre-recorded media content. Customers can simply use our encoder software
      to convert their media content into our Clipstream® format and upload it
      to their web site with the accompanying applet.                                                                   
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | 7. | We have developed our Clipstream® software to be as
      scaleable as possible. A video or audio clip encoded in Clipstream® is
      treated like any other element in the web page. It can be served by a
      standard HTTP server, caching network or proxy and can pass seamlessly
      through a firewall.                     
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | 8. | Corporate environments using our Clipstream® software
      have an advantage over player-based solutions as management information
      systems staff do not have to ensure that players are correctly installed
      on each machine in their corporate network in order for users to receive
      audio and video streaming media.
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | 9. | Clipstream® content can be locked to a particular
      website, protecting content owners from piracy. Video content can be
      watermarked and screen scraper programs can be
blocked.                                                                                                                                              

Clipstream® products and solutions include:

Clipstream®: embeds high fidelity audio and video on demand
into web pages and emails http://www.clipstream.com, http://www.streamingaudio.com

Clipstream® Live: embeds live video stream into web pages and
emails http://live.clipstream.com

Clipstream® IPTV: users can view TV and change channels
remotelyhttp://live.clipstream.com

Clipstream® Audiomail: converts audio left on a telephone
answering machine into an audio clip http://www.audio-mail.com

Clipstream® Survey Solutions: secure video questionnaires
prevent piracy and feature high view rates http://www.surveyclip.com

Clipstream® Advertising Solutions: TV style video commercials
and rich media banner ads http://www.clipstreamad.com

Clipstream® Server Solutions: servers to power hosted siteshttp://www.clipstreamserver.com

Radio Destiny: Software and network to broadcast internet radio
from a home computer http://www.radiodestiny.com, http://www.pirateradio.com, http://www.stationdirectory.com

The Clipstream® brand is being expanded to become a solution
for encoding, hosting, reporting, controlling access rights and securely moving
any content type. A new hosting solution has been under development since fiscal
2007 which will encapsulate all of the Clipstream® offerings. The first launch,
anticipated in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, will allow users to upload any
content type into a system that will give them their own http://www.clipstream.com/user_name website. Although
they can rename the URL, the default free version will provide brand awareness
for our solution. HTML code can be cut and pasted to embed Clipstream® hosted
content into third party sites or to share by email. The system will support
email list management and the ability to create templates. You Tube style
functionality, linking content to content created by other users will be
available at the customers option, but it will be accessed from their own pages.
Future versions will integrate internet radio and TV, live webcasts, audiomail
and other solutions into a single offering. Users will have the ability to
watermark content, encrypt it, require a password, control access to lists of IP
addresses or user names or to lock the content to authorized domains. Audio and
video will automatically be converted into the Clipstream® format unless
disabled in the preferences, but the original content in original download
quality will also be available. Content will be extensively tagged, giving users
the ability to use Clipstream® as a content management system to archive content
for easy future access.

8

---

OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS

We lease 10,100 square feet of office space, with the lease
expiring in August of 2010, and we currently have twenty full time employees and
one part time employee. Our employees include our President and Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, our vice-presidents of operations, a legal
affairs and HR director, thirteen sales and support personnel and seven software
developers. We also employ contractors as needed.

We manage our own server infrastructure and use the services of
an external hosting facility. We have eleven servers at two physical locations.
Servers are highly redundant with RAIDs, custom switches, redundant power
supplies and multiple connections to the internet backbone. The first location
is 1 gigabit per second and the backup facility is 100 megabit per second.

COMPETITION

The main competitor for our Play MPE® distribution service
remains the physical distribution of music CDs and promotional security free
digital distribution of MP3s. Although we are aware of regional competitors in
the secure digital distribution market outside of the US, we are not aware of
any company which has a significant presence in secure digital distribution in
the United States or a significant presence on a global basis. We are unaware of
any company that has a commercial secure digital distribution agreement with any
US major label or any major independent label in the US.

The Play MPE® distribution system is paid for by the record
labels in an effort to promote their music. This promotion is effective if the
individuals expected to receive the pre-release music, actively use the system.
The usage on the recipient end is determined by a number of factors including;
the availability of desirable music, ease of use, added functionality,
awareness, accurate contact information for the individuals receiving the
content, and the sound quality of the music in the system. We have actively
established ourselves in the United States market place by providing the service
free of charge for a number of years and building a base of active participants.
While management is unaware of any one significant competitor in the United
States, we feel that we compete very favorably in all of these areas providing
significant barriers to entry in the market place.

The popularity of each piece of music depends on the individual
recipient. However, higher profile artists which are generally distributed by
the US majors record labels, major independent record labels and/or their
management companies, tend to be accessed more frequently. We are unaware of any
business in the secure digital distribution market that has a contract with a US
major record label or a major independent label in the US. We have agreements
with three(3) of the four(4) US majors, agreements with some of the sub-labels
of the fourth and distribute songs for other sub-labels of the fourth major on a
pay-as-you-go basis and have signed agreements with in excess of 150 independent
record labels, management companies, and promotional companies which represent
countless individual sub-labels. We have over 100,000 individual songs in our
library across all major formats of music and we continue to grow this library
rapidly. No other system in this business has a comparable library of music.

As we develop our technologies in-house, have proprietary
technologies which power MPE® and Clipstream® and have been working with closely
with the music industry for a number of years, our service offering and
functionality exceeds any system of which we are currently aware. Our technology
allows for lossless High Definition sound quality at download times that exceed
any other system currently available. Other systems provide downloads at
comparable speeds but have an audible loss of fidelity. Our patent pending
forensic watermarking technique can be embedded in nearly real time, does not
negatively impact the sound quality of the music as it is inaudible, and is
nearly impossible to remove. Competing providers of this imperative security
feature have solutions that create audible noise distortions, do not survive
compression or on-air broadcast and which take a much longer period of time to
embed. We have numerous added features which include accessing from a web page
without installing an agent, accessing in Spanish, accessing from a Mac,
exporting licensed AAC versions of songs to an iPod and burning to a CD.
Testimonials regarding how the industry views our system can be found at
http://www.plaympe.com/v4/testimonials/testimonials.php.

We actively maintain and update our distribution lists and have
implemented procedures to ensure we receive information necessary to maintain
accurate distribution channels. These lists are an extremely valuable piece of
the business and are kept confidential. Alternatively, we provide our clients
with the ability to distribute to individuals of their choosing and to create
lists in the system that they can maintain.

While promotional departments and legal departments of some
record labels can conflict in their motives of choosing a distribution service,
the choice of the manner in which a record label distributes its music generally
depends on the

9

---

effectiveness of the distribution, the speed with which songs
get to the recipient, the cost, the security inherent in the system, the
functionality of the system, ease of use and flexibility of the system.

We provide access to our songs through industry leading
monitoring systems and our partner Mediabase. We provide significant savings, in
both time and money, over the manufacture and mailing of CDs and our system
provides the senders the flexibility to distribute directly and therefore
eliminating any involvement of our internal staff. Our security features,
discussed in more detail above, provide significant competitive advantages by
creating added confidence and flexibility to the record labels.

There is a significant gap in usage between our Play MPE®
system and our nearest competitor and, though the market is only beginning to
develop and grow, our competitive advantages on both the recipient and sender
side, we believe, create significant barriers to entry.

PODDS, our online music store has a number of large competitors
including Pure Tracks and iTunes in Canada. We are not aware of a significant
provider of online music store software.

Our principal competitor for Clipstream® is Adobe Flash and to
a lesser extent, the player solutions provided by Apple and Microsoft.
Competitors for the new hosting solution will include video encoding companies,
internet hosting companies and file sharing companies such as Yousendit and
Rapidshare. All are substantially larger than we are and have significantly
greater financial resources available and have increased their commitment to and
presence in the streaming media industry. We anticipate they will continue to
increase the competitive pressure in the overall market for streaming media
software. This increased competition could lead to increased pressure to
decrease the price of streaming media software. This pressure on price could
force us to reduce the price that we are able to charge our customers for our
software products.

We must continue to innovate and improve the performance of our
software products to compete in the media technologies market, to maintain our
customer base and to increase our customer base. We anticipate that
consolidation will continue in this industry and related industries such as
computer software, media and communications. Consequently, competitors may be
acquired by, receive investments from or enter into other commercial
relationships with, larger, well-established and well-financed companies. There
can be no assurance that we will be able to establish or sustain a leadership
position in these market segments. We are committed to working toward market
penetration of our brand, products and services, which, as a strategic response
to changes in the competitive environment, may require pricing, licensing,
service or marketing changes intended to extend our current brand and
technology. Price concessions or the emergence of other pricing or distribution
strategies by competitors may reduce the prices that we may charge our customers
for our software products. In addition, many of our current and potential
competitors have greater name recognition, larger overall installed bases, more
employees and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, public
relations and distribution resources than we do. These competitive factors may
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

We are not currently subject to direct regulation by any
governmental agency other than laws and regulations generally applicable to
businesses. It is possible that a number of laws and regulations may be adopted
in both the United States and Canada with particular applicability to the
Internet. Governments have and may continue to enact legislation applicable to
us in areas such as content distribution, performance and copying, other
copyright issues, network security, encryption, the use of key escrow data,
privacy protection, caching of content by server products, electronic
authentication or digital signatures, illegal or obscene content, access
charges and retransmission activities. The applicability to the Internet of
existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, content, taxation,
defamation and personal privacy is also uncertain. Export or import
restrictions, new legislation or regulation or governmental enforcement of
existing regulations may limit the growth of the Internet, increase our costs of
doing business or increase its legal exposure.

|ITEM 2. | DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.
|------- | ------------------------

Our head office is located in leased premises at Suite 800, 570
Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3P1. Our principal
business operations are carried out from head office. Our leased premises
consist of approximately 10,100 square feet. We pay rent of approximately
$26,000 Canadian (equal to approximately $24,500 US) per month. The lease
expires August 30, 2010. We consider our leased premises adequate for our
current business purposes.

10

---

The Company owns proprietary algorithms, source code,
trademarks and other intellectual property associated with its Clipstream® and
MPE® product lines. The Clipstream® video codec is a proprietary trade secret
which requires very little resources to decompress, making it suitable for
implementation in machine independent and cross platform languages such as
Java.

We have two outstanding patent applications for the MPE®
distribution system covering our innovative security features. The United States
Patent & Trademark Office has issued a 'Notice of Allowance' for the first
of these, entitled 'Digital Media Distribution Method and System' patent
application (USPTO Publication No. 20020146122, International WIPO 01/65796).
The second patent titled Methods for Watermarking Media Data (US
20080098022) was published in April 2008 and is pending review by the
USPTO..

We have been granted a trademark for Clipstream® in the US,
Canada, Japan, Israel and Europe in connection with our software products. We
have also been granted a trademark in the US for MPE®.

We have applied for trademark protection for MPE® in Canada,
China, Europe and Japan. We have applied for trademark protection for PLAY MPEä
and SONOX DIGITALTMin the US, Canada, China, Europe and Japan . This
protection is currently pending.

We generally develop our own technologies and algorithms in
house and have a number of technologies that we rely on to maintain our
competitive advantage. Additionally we have in excess of 40 registered domain
names.

|ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
|------- | ------------------

On March 7, 2006 the Company filed a statement of claim in the
Federal Court of Canada against Yangaroo Inc. (formerly Musicrypt Inc.) (the
Defendant) to assert that the Companys technology does not infringe on the
stated Canadian patent owned by the Defendant and to further declare that
Defendants patent is invalid. This statement of claim was initiated by the
Company as a result of the Defendants statements to the contrary. On June 7,
2006, the Companys counsel received a statement of defense and counterclaim
from the defendant, requesting specified damages or audited Canadian profits
from the Play MPE® system when offered in Canada.

On January 11, 2007 the Federal Court of Canada issued a
bifurcation order of the issues included in the action. Accordingly, only the
issues of infringement and validity of the patent raised in the claim will be
addressed in the current proceeding. The remaining issues including the
counterclaim for specified damages will be subject of a separate determination
to be conducted after the trial if it then appears that such issues need to be
decided.

On May 3, 2007 the Company filed a statement of claim in
Ontario Superior Court for damages against the defendant (Yangaroo Inc.), and
executives of the Defendant, John Heaven and Clifford Hunt (collectively the
Defendants) in the amount of $25,000,000 caused by the Defendants making
statements constituting defamation and injurious falsehood, making false or
misleading statements tending to discredit the business, making false or
misleading representations contrary to the Competition Act of Canada, and
unlawful interference with the Companys economic relations. The statement
further requests an injunction from continuing the actions instigating the
statement of claim.

On June 7, 2007 the defendant filed a statement of defense,
denying the allegations set out in the statement of claim dated May 3, 2007, and
counterclaim against the Company and our CEO, Steve Vestergaard, also in the
amount of $25,000,000, for making statements constituting defamation and
injurious falsehood, making false or misleading statements tending to discredit
the business, making false or misleading representations contrary to the
Competition Act, and unlawful interference with the defendants economic
relations. The Company further requests an injunction from continuing the
defamatory actions.

No amount has been recognized as a receivable for damages as
outlined in the statement of claim. The amount of damages awarded to either
party, if any, in relation to the claim or counterclaim cannot be reasonably
estimated and no amount has been recognized. Management does not believe that
the outcome of this matter will have an adverse impact on its result of
operations and financial condition.

|ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
      HOLDERS.
|------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

No matters were submitted to our security holders for a vote
during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ending August 31, 2008.

11

---

PART II

|ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND
      RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND **SMALL
      BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.**
|------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       

Market Information

Our shares are currently trading on the OTC Bulletin Board
under the stock symbol DSNY. The first day on which the Companys shares were
traded under the stock symbol DSNY was June 26, 2000. The high and the low
trading prices for our shares for each quarter of the last two fiscal years
were:

QUARTER
    HIGH ($)
    LOW ($)1stQuarter 2007
    $0.34
    $0.202ndQuarter 2007
    $0.71
    $0.263rdQuarter 2007
    $1.08
    $0.444thQuarter 2007
    $0.70
    $0.351stQuarter 2008
    $0.63
    $0.402ndQuarter 2008
    $0.81
    $0.453rdQuarter 2008
    $0.70
    $0.474thQuarter 2008
    $0.62
    $0.35


The trades reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up,
markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

Holders of Common Stock

As of November 18, 2008 we had 51,223,647 shares of our common
stock outstanding and there were 1,259 registered shareholders of our common
stock.

Dividends

We have neither declared nor paid any cash dividends on our
capital stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable
future. Our current policy is to retain any earnings in order to finance the
expansion of our operations. Our Board of Directors will determine future
declaration and payment of dividends, if any, in light of the then-current
conditions they deem relevant and in accordance with applicable corporate
law.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During our fiscal year ended August 31, 2008, the Company
completed a private placement which consisted of the issuance of 470,500 units
at $0.55 for net cash proceeds of $258,775 and 11,772 units at $0.40 for net
cash proceeds of $4,709. The $0.55 unit consists of one common share and 1/2
warrant exercisable into one common share at $0.60 expiring November 30, 2009.
The $0.40 unit consists of one common share and 1/2 warrant exercisable into one
common share at $0.50 expiring January 31, 2010.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other
securities during the year ended August 31, 2008.

|ITEM 6. | MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS.
|------- | -------------------------------------

The following discussion of our results of operations and
financial condition should be read together with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes that are included later in this Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various
factors.

12

---

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31,
2008

Revenue

Revenue continued to grow during our fourth quarter and was
again the highest in the Companys history. Our fourth quarter revenue grew by
more than 33% from our third quarter to approximately $490,000 on the strength
of our twelfth straight quarter of revenue growth in our Play MPEä system, which
grew by 35%. Revenue for both Clipstream® and for MPE® increased during the
quarter. Overall revenue has grown every quarter over the last two years and has
grown by an average over that period of 15% per quarter.

The continued quarterly growth has lead to an annual growth of
80% over fiscal 2007 to $1,578,888 (2007 - $875,544). Revenue from our MPE®
technology continues to improve with a large percentage jump of approximately
150% to approximately $1,250,000 in 2008 (from $507,000 in 2007). The growth in
MPE® revenue is due primarily to the acceptance of our Play MPE® (www.plaympe.com) product in the United States and
expansion into Europe. Play MPE® is the global leader which dominates an
evolving business and leads the transformation of the way in which record labels
distribute pre-release music. While the industry is adjusting from other
distribution methods , whether that is the manufacturing and mailing of CDs or
emailing lower quality and unsecured MP3s, on both the sender (record labels)
and the receiving side (radio personnel, media reviewers etc), 2008 saw some
significant and encouraging changes for our Play MPE® business which saw the
beginnings of a change in the way the industry does prerelease distribution.

During our second quarter we signed a distribution agreement
with EMI, our second major label contract (after Universal Music Group), for
access to our Play MPE® service and began billing in January 2008.

Concurrently, we phased out all independent label trial
distributions and began signing contracts with independent record labels,
management companies and promoters. We continue to sign new contracts and we
have seen growing revenue in this segment throughout the year. Our fourth
quarter revenue from the independent group of customers represents approximately
24% of our total Play MPE® revenue and has grown approximately 400% over the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. Our independent music label customers include
numerous large major independent record labels, management companies and
promoters such as Curb Records, Koch Entertainment, Robbins Entertainment,
Rounder Records, New Line Records, Ultra Records, Shangri-la Music, Nettwork,
Sub-pop, In2une Music, and CO5 Music to name only a small fraction of our
clients. These clients represent a broad range of music formats, movie
soundtracks and countless big name artists. Effective April 1, 2008, we extended
and expanded our commercial agreement with Universal Music Group (UMG) to
distribute their music in Canada, the United States and Mexico through the Play
MPE® system.. The press release issued by UMG announcing this agreement can be
found at (http://new.umusic.com/News.aspx?NewsId=629). This
agreement is effective from March 31, 2008 through March 31, 2010 and includes
monthly minimum revenue amounts which increase in the second year of the
agreement. The agreement grants the Company the exclusive right to distribute
UMGs music on a company-wide basis and calls for UMG to encourage all of its
controlled record labels to use the MPE system as their sole method for online
distribution.

Our expansion into Europe resulted in our first commercial
agreements in June with the signing of contracts with major label subsidiaries;
Sony BMG Sweden, Universal Music Sweden and Warner Music Sweden which are all
effective June 1, 2008. Warner Sweden was subsequently expanded to include
Norway and Denmark.

Effective July 1, 2008, we reached an interim agreement with
Warner Music Group for distribution access to our Play MPE® system. Effective
November 1, 2008, this interim agreement and our agreements with other Warner
Music Group subsidiaries outside the United States was replaced by a contract
for worldwide distribution.

We have several agreements with subsidiaries of Sony BMG and
several additional labels operate on a pay-as-you-go basis.

While this market development is still at an early stage, the
value propositions of the Play MPE® system are both compelling and numerous and
we have found we compete well against existing or traditional methods of
dissemination as well as alternatives in the market. Our product provides
significant advantages such as reducing the costs and lead times, and providing
feedback on usage to the record labels. Further, the added benefit of being
environmentally friendly appeals to all considered. We compete favorably against
the distribution of MP3s by the superior sound quality of files in our system,
the security, the reporting (feedback) and the network of recipients using our
system. Play MPE® provides many significant advantages over competing solutions
such superior sound quality, superior security, constructive business

13

---

relationships, more advantageous partner relationships, and
countless added functions of the player software and total service offering.

While having the best product does not guarantee success,
management believes that this, coupled with having the largest portion of the
market, our progress in expanding globally, our partners, and value propositions
mentioned above, will lead to continued growth in revenue for an extended period
of time.

Our revenue model is based on invoicing on a price per send.
In October 2008, we reached new milestones having delivered more than 100,000
individual songs in more than 100 million transactions with over 23,000 users.
We refer to a transaction as one song which is made available to one
recipient. For revenue purposes, fees are based on sends as defined in their
respective agreements, and could include a single transaction or group of
transactions. A send is a song, bundle of songs, album, box set, or video,
authorized to be sent to a particular recipient. The revenue associated with
each send will be on a sliding scale depending on the size of the particular
send. The system provides each label under contract to manage their own lists of
recipients and directly encode and distribute their songs. This added ability
provided to our clients substantially eliminates the strain on our own internal
resources that can be seen in competing solutions and allows for high growth
potential.

For customers where it is not appropriate to enter into a
formal contract we provide access to the Play MPE® system through www.myplaympe.com.

The MPE® security engine also powers our online music store
software suite (www.podds.ca) which provides
for the remainder of MPE® revenue.

Approximately 19% of our revenues are derived from sales of our
Clipstream® software which declined from the previous year by 11%. This reflects
a management strategy of focusing sales, marketing and support resources on MPE®
until the new automated system for Clipstream® is available. We hope to increase
sales of Clipstream® licenses through our hosted solution, which should be
available later in this year, and other license opportunities.

Radio Destiny sales represent 2% of our total revenue.

Operating Expenses

Overview

As our technologies and products are developed and maintained
in-house, the majority of our expenditures are on salaries and wages and
associated expenses; office space, supplies and benefits. During the past year
we expanded our spending on marketing, traveling, advertising and associated
expenses with the global expansion of Play MPE®. While these costs will be
incurred in the future, they are more discretionary in nature and will be
incurred as appropriate. The remainder of our costs are professional fees and
those generally associated with a public company. As a company with operations
primarily conducted in Canada, the majority of our costs are incurred in
Canadian dollars while the majority of our revenue is in US dollars. Thus, the
results of operations are impacted to the extent they are not hedged by the rise
and fall of the relative values of the US and Canadian currencies. During 2008
we saw the US dollar fall in value relative to the Canadian dollar and our costs
have been adversely impacted for this reason. We anticipate an opposite impact
for 2009.

Overall expenditures in the fourth quarter have decreased by
15% over the third quarter as we move to a more sustainable level of
expenditures for the current stage of our business. Expenditures during the
fourth quarter were also 22% lower than the same quarter in the previous
year.

At the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2007 we positioned
ourselves to market and support the Play MPE® line of services internally. This
required hiring additional staff in Play MPE® management and support and
additional software development staff. This shift began in March 2007 and has
been the most significant impact to the increase in current expenditures in
fiscal 2008.

Additionally, we began targeted marketing and advertising
campaigns to develop the market for Play MPE®. There have been modest increases
in technical costs like internet bandwidth, equipment etc. since that time.
During the latter half of fiscal 2007 and throughout fiscal 2008, we have been
servicing a fully operational Play MPE® system as our clients continued to use
our system extensively. This allowed us to expand the use at both radio and
record labels and to establish the Play MPE® network.

14

---

For the year, our total operating expenses have increased by
33% to $3,983,821 from $3,994,612.

At the end of fiscal 2007 we moved offices due to a proposed
rent increase and to accommodate anticipated growth in staff. We were able to
secure approximately double the square footage for approximately the same cost
as the proposed rent increase. The new space is sufficiently large and efficient
to accommodate our growth while providing some space to sublease. The rent
expense of $320,176 is offset by our sub-lease rental income of $111,741 which
is included in Other income in the Statement of Operations.

|General and administrative     |  | 31-Aug    |  |  | 31-Aug  |   |  | **$**   |  |  | %      | 
|------------------------------ |  | --------- |  |  | ------- | - |  | ------- |  |  | ------ | 
|                               |  | 2008      |  |  | 2007    |   |  | Change  |  |  | Change | 
|                               |  |           |  |  |         |   |  |         |  |  |        | 
|Wages and benefits             |  | 408,902   |  |  | 332,418 |   |  | 76,484  |  |  | 23.0%  | 
|Rent                           |  | 59,893    |  |  | 27,066  |   |  | 32,827  |  |  | 121.3% | 
|Telecommunications             |  | 19,674    |  |  | 13,303  |   |  | 6,371   |  |  | 47.9%  | 
|Bad debt                       |  | 54,094    |  |  | (361    | ) |  | 54,455  |  |  | NM     | 
|Office and
      miscellaneous |  | 193,662   |  |  | 54,274  |   |  | 139,388 |  |  | 256.8% | 
|Professional fees              |  | 312,468   |  |  | 244,611 |   |  | 67,857  |  |  | 27.7%  | 
|                               |  | 1,048,693 |  |  | 671,311 |   |  | 377,382 |  |  | 56.2%  | 

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and related personnel costs including overhead, professional fees, and
other general office expenditures.

The increase in salaries and wages is due primarily to
additional staff. The increase in professional fees is due to a greater volume
of legal work associated with securities, litigation, contracts, patents and
trademarks. Office and miscellaneous costs have increased as a result of a stock
exchange listing application and investor relations fees.

|Sales and marketing       |  | 31-Aug    |  |  | 31-Aug    |  |  | **$**    |   |  | %      |  
|------------------------- |  | --------- |  |  | --------- |  |  | -------- | - |  | ------ | -
|                          |  | 2008      |  |  | 2007      |  |  | Change   |   |  | Change |  
|                          |  |           |  |  |           |  |  |          |   |  |        |  
|Wages and benefits        |  | 639,408   |  |  | 414,584   |  |  | 224,824  |   |  | 54.2%  |  
|Rent                      |  | 89,575    |  |  | 31,269    |  |  | 58,306   |   |  | 186.5% |  
|Telecommunications        |  | 29,424    |  |  | 15,368    |  |  | 14,056   |   |  | 91.5%  |  
|Meals and entertainment   |  | 19,590    |  |  | 4,391     |  |  | 15,199   |   |  | 346.1% |  
|Travel                    |  | 84,805    |  |  | 65,906    |  |  | 18,899   |   |  | 28.7%  |  
|Advertising and marketing |  | 635,220   |  |  | 819,840   |  |  | (184,620 | ) |  | (22.5% | )
|                          |  | 1,498,022 |  |  | 1,351,358 |  |  | 146,664  |   |  | 10.9%  |  

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and
related personnel costs including overhead, sales commissions, advertising and
promotional fees, and travel costs. The majority of this increase was due to
additional staff to further the distribution and acceptance of the Play MPE®
distribution system. We realized a reduction in advertising and marketing
through reductions in expenses with various suppliers which were required to
promote the Play MPE® business. During fiscal 2008 we focused our spending on
magazine advertising and trade show attendance. This reflected a progression in
the awareness of our Play MPE® system and the increased effectiveness of various
viral marketing techniques which are designed to increase and maintain awareness
of the system and reduced costs.

During the year, marketing efforts included attending various
conventions to promote Play MPE as follows:

September 26-28, 2007: Exhibitor at the
combined Radio & Records/National Association of Broadcasters Radio Show
Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina (including several advertisements).

October 5-10, 2007: Billboard Dance
Music Summit in Las Vegas, Nevada.

November 1, 2, 2007: The Hollywood
Reporter, Billboard Film & TV Music Conference in Los Angeles,
California.

15

---

| | November 15, 16, 2007: Radio & Record
      Christian Summit in Nashville, Tennessee.    
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                          
| | November 28-30, 2007: Billboard R&B Hip Hop
      Conference in Atlanta, Georgia.        
| |                                                                                          
| | November 30-December 2, 2007: Billboard I Rock
      the Mic events in Miami, Florida.   
| |                                                                                          
| | November 28-30, 2007: Billboard R&B Hip Hop
      Conference in Atlanta, Georgia.        
| |                                                                                          
| | January 9, 2008: Billboard Digital Music
      Conference in Los Angeles, California.    
| |                                                                                          
| | March 4-8, 2008: Country Radio Broadcasters
      Seminar, Nashville, Tennessee.         
| |                                                                                          
| | March 18 -20, 2008: City of Hope, New York, New
      York.                              
| |                                                                                          
| | March 7-16 South by South West Conference,
      Austin, Texas.                         
| |                                                                                          
| | March 15-16 - Core DJs, New Orleans, LA.                                                 
| |                                                                                          
| | March 26-29, 2008: 20th Annual Urban Network
      Convention, Newport Beach, California.
| |                                                                                          
| | April 26-30, 2008: Musexpo in Los Angeles,
      California.                             
| |                                                                                          
| | June 9-12, 2008: Dean went to Nashville,
      Tennessee                                 
| |                                                                                          
| | June 25-28, 2008: Conclave convention,
      Minneapolis, Minnesota                      
| |                                                                                          
| | September 17-19, 2008: NAB Radio Show 2008,
      Austin, Texas                          

Our staff have toured extensively throughout the United States
meeting with major market radio networks expanding the knowledge and acceptance
of our Play MPE system. Greater detail on our marketing efforts can be found at
http://www.dsny.com/news/ .

As part of our Clipstream® marketing we also attended:

October 5, 2007: Counsel of American
Survey Research Organizations (CASRO) 32nd Annual Conference in Scottsdale,
Arizona.

October 29 November 1, 2007: VON Fall
Expo in Boston, Massachusetts.

16

---

|Research and development |  | 31-Aug    |  |  | 31-Aug  |  |  | **$**   |  |  | %      | 
|------------------------ |  | --------- |  |  | ------- |  |  | ------- |  |  | ------ | 
|                         |  | 2008      |  |  | 2007    |  |  | Change  |  |  | Change | 
|                         |  |           |  |  |         |  |  |         |  |  |        | 
|Wages and benefits       |  | 1,165,463 |  |  | 809,022 |  |  | 356,441 |  |  | 44.1%  | 
|Rent                     |  | 170,708   |  |  | 65,871  |  |  | 104,837 |  |  | 159.2% | 
|Telecommunications       |  | 56,074    |  |  | 32,375  |  |  | 23,699  |  |  | 73.2%  | 
|Repairs and maintenance  |  | -         |  |  | 1,773   |  |  | -       |  |  | -      | 
|                         |  | 1,392,245 |  |  | 909,041 |  |  | 484,977 |  |  | 53.4%  | 

Research and development costs consist primarily of salaries
and related personnel costs including overhead and consulting fees with respect
to product development and deployment. The increase reflects increased staffing
used in the development of new and improved versions of our products as
discussed in greater detail above.

Amortization

Amortization expense arose from fixed assets and other assets.
Amortization decreased to $44,861 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008 from
$62,902 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007, a decrease of $18,041 or
28.68% .

Other earnings and expenses

Interest and other expense increased to $24,945 for the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2008 from $13,289 for an increase of $11,656 as a result
of increase credit card service fees associated with our increase in sales.
During the year we had sublease income of $111,741.

17

---

Losses

Our net loss for the fourth quarter dropped by 56% over the
previous quarter to approximately $212,000 as we move to a level of expenditures
appropriate for the current business plan and on the strength of continued
growth in revenue. For the year, our loss from operations has increased to
$2,404,933 from $2,119,068 for the year ended August 31, 2007, representing an
increase of $285,865. Our net loss increased to $2,293,178 for the year ended
August 31, 2008 from $2,096,974 for the year ended August 31, 2007, representing
an increase of $196,204 or 9.36% . As outlined in greater detail above, the
primary reason for the increase in loss is due to increase in staffing levels to
service and market the Play MPE® system as the industry standard across the
globe. We anticipate expanding the use of our system by existing customers,
expanding globally and expanding our service offerings.

Our revenue has increased significantly and we hope to continue
this progress by way of increased revenue generating contracts for Play MPE®, an
expansion into Europe and Australia and more use by existing customers. However,
as we have increased staff and marketing expenditures our losses have
increased.

LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

We had cash of $91,369 as at August 31, 2008 compared to cash
of $1,215,183 as at August 31, 2007. We had a working capital deficiency of
$192,772 as at August 31, 2008 compared to a working capital surplus of
$1,229,357 as at August 31, 2007.

Cash Flows

Net cash used in operating activities increased to $1,707,169
for the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to $1,642,770 for the year ended
August 31, 2007, representing an increase of $64,400 or 4%. The increase is
mainly due to increased staff costs associated with the expansion of the Play
MPEä system. The cash used in operating activities was in part off-set by net
cash provided by financing activities in the amount of $568,048 for the year
ended August 31, 2008 compared to $2,630,996 for the year ended August 31, 2007.
During the year we completed a successful private placement of $263,484 and
received cash proceeds of $260,412 from the exercise of stock options.

We have financed our operations to date primarily through the
sale of equity securities and borrowings from shareholders. When possible, we
have issued common stock for services and debt settlement. We continued these
financing activities through the year ended August 31, 2008 as our revenues to
date have provided insufficient funding for our working capital requirements and
the aggressive implementation of our business plan. We expect revenues, and
cashflows, to improve into fiscal 2009. We are encouraged by our revenue growth
in fiscal 2008 as our record label clients incorporate Play MPE® into their work
flow.

Going Concern

To date, we have experienced recurring net losses (2008 -
$2,293,178) and currently have a stockholders deficiency of $132,609 and a
working capital deficit of $192,772. During the year ended August 31, 2008, we
have aggressively implemented our business plan of transitioning new and
existing customers (record labels) to transactional based contracts through
the full commercial deployment of our Play MPE system. Our revenue has
increased quarter over quarter, every quarter for the past two years, while
expenditures required to service this revenue growth have curtailed
significantly over the latter half of 2008. We anticipate continued growth in
revenue and improvements to our cash flow.

We will need to raise additional funds to complete our business
plan due to our significant working capital deficiency. Our goal is to obtain
these funds through internal and external financing opportunities including cash
flows from operations, strategic partnerships, equity financings and shareholder
loans. There are no assurances that we will be successful in achieving these
goals.

In view of these conditions, our ability to continue as a going
concern is in doubt. Our financial statements do not give effect to any
adjustments which would be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going
concern and therefore be required to realize our assets and discharge our
liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different
from those reflected in the accompanying financial statements.

18

---

MATERIAL OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

None.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and make
estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent
liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and other
assumptions that we believe are reasonable in the circumstances. Actual results
may differ from these estimates.

The following critical accounting policies affect our more
significant estimates and assumptions used in preparing our consolidated
financial statements.

- The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the going
  concern basis, which assumes the realization of assets and liquidation of
  liabilities in the normal course of operations. If we were not to continue as
  a going concern, we would likely not be able to realize on our assets at
  values comparable to the carrying value or the fair value estimates reflected
  in the balances set out in the preparation of the consolidated financial
  statements. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in
  generating additional cash from equity or other sources to be used for
  operations. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
  adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of
  assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to
  continue as a going concern.
- We recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement,
  delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, collection is
  reasonably assured, and there are no substantive performance obligations
  remaining. Our revenue recognition policies are in conformity with AICPAs
  Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended
  (SOP 97-2). We generate revenue from software arrangements involving multiple
  element sales arrangements. Revenue is allocated to each element of the
  arrangement based on the relative fair value of the elements and is recognized
  as each element is delivered and we have no significant remaining performance
  obligations. If evidence of fair value for each element does not exist, all
  revenue from the arrangement is recognized over the term of the arrangement.
  Changes in our business priorities or model in the future could materially
  impact our reported revenue and cash flow. Although such changes are not
  currently contemplated, they could be required in response to industry or
  customer developments.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS 157 Fair Value
Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under
other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements,
the Board having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that
fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement
does not require any new fair value measurements. However, for some entities,
the application of this Statement will change current practice. This Statement
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company
will adopt SFAS 157 effective September 1, 2008 and does not expect the adoption
to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159 The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities  including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159) which permits entities to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement
is effective for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company
will adopt SFAS 157 effective September 1, 2008 and does not expect the adoption
to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.

19

---

|ITEM 7. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
|------- | ---------------------

Index to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year
Ended August 31, 2008:

|1. | Report of Independent
        Registered Public Accounting Firm;                                                                    
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                     
|2. | Consolidated Balance
        Sheets as at August 31, 2008 and 2007;                                                                 
|   |                                                                                                                                     
|3. | Consolidated Statement
        of Operations for the Years Ended August 31, 2008 and 2007;                                          
|   |                                                                                                                                     
|4. | Consolidated Statement
        of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency) for the Years Ended August
        31, 2008 and 2007;
|   |                                                                                                                                     
|5. | Consolidated Statement
        of Cash Flows for the Years Ended August 31, 2008 and 2007;                                          
|   |                                                                                                                                     
|6. | Notes to Consolidated
        Financial Statements.                                                                                 

20

---

Consolidated Financial Statements

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.August 31, 2008 and 2007
  (Expressed in United States dollars)

---

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED 
  PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
  of Destiny Media Technologies Inc. as of August 31, 2008 and 2007 and
  the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders
  equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
  statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility
  is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
  Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
  that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
  the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged
  to perform an audit of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
  Our audits include consideration of internal control over financial reporting
  as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances,
  but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
  Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
  no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
  supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
  the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
  and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
  our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
  fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Destiny
  Media Technologies Inc. at August 31, 2008 and 2007 and the consolidated
  results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity
  with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements,
  the Companys recurring net losses from operations and shareholders
  deficiency raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
  concern. Managements plans in regard to these matters are also described
  in Note 2. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
  that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

|                   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|------------------ | ---------------------
|                   |                      
|Vancouver, Canada, |                      
|November 26, 2008  | Chartered Accountants

F-2

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS[See Note 2 - Going Concern Uncertainty]

|As at August 31 | (Expressed in United States dollars)
|--------------- | ------------------------------------

|                                                     |  | 2008       |   |  | 2007       |  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | - |  | ---------- | -
|                                                     |  | $          |   |  | $          |  
|                                                     |  |            |   |  |            |  
|ASSETS                                               |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Current                                              |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Cash                                                 |  | 91,369     |   |  | 1,215,183  |  
|Accounts and other receivables, net of allowance for |  |            |   |  |            |  
|doubtful accounts of $56,365[2007
      - $5,221]    |  | 336,734    |   |  | 265,849    |  
|Prepaid expenses                                     |  | 73,171     |   |  | 83,751     |  
|Total current assets                                 |  | 501,274    |   |  | 1,564,783  |  
|Deposits                                             |  | 48,863     |   |  | 110,365    |  
|Property and equipment, net [note 4]                 |  | 111,300    |   |  | 111,907    |  
|Total assets                                         |  | 661,437    |   |  | 1,787,055  |  
|                                                     |  |            |   |  |            |  
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIENCY             |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Current                                              |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Accounts payable                                     |  | 382,606    |   |  | 132,245    |  
|Accrued liabilities                                  |  | 245,977    |   |  | 193,197    |  
|Shareholder loans payable [note 5]                   |  | 44,152     |   |  |           |  
|Deferred revenue                                     |  | 21,311     |   |  | 9,984      |  
|Total current liabilities                            |  | 694,046    |   |  | 335,426    |  
|Obligation for share settlement [note 6]             |  | 100,000    |   |  | 100,000    |  
|Total liabilities                                    |  | 794,046    |   |  | 435,426    |  
|                                                     |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Commitments and contingencies [notes 9 and 11]       |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Stockholders deficiency[note
      7]               |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Common shares, par value $0.001                      |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Authorized: 100,000,000 shares                       |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Issued and outstanding: 51,090,314 shares            |  |            |   |  |            |  
|[August 31, 2007 - 49,936,001 shares]                |  | 51,092     |   |  | 49,938     |  
|Issued and held for settlement: 133,333 shares       |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Additional paid-capital                              |  | 9,208,131  |   |  | 8,484,231  |  
|Deficit                                              |  | (9,511,445 | ) |  | (7,218,267 | )
|Accumulated other comprehensive income               |  | 119,613    |   |  | 35,727     |  
|Total stockholders
      deficiency                 |  | (132,609   | ) |  | 1,351,629  |  
|Total liabilities and shareholders deficiency       |  | 661,437    |   |  | 1,787,055  |  

See accompanying notes

F-3

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

|Years ended August 31 | (Expressed in United States dollars)
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------

|                                                   |  | 2008       |   |  | 2007       |  
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | - |  | ---------- | -
|                                                   |  | $          |   |  | $          |  
|                                                   |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Revenue[note 13]                                   |  | 1,578,888  |   |  | 875,544    |  
|                                                   |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Operating expenses                                 |  |            |   |  |            |  
|General and administrative [note 7(c)]             |  | 1,048,693  |   |  | 671,311    |  
|Sales and marketing [note 7(c)]                    |  | 1,498,022  |   |  | 1,351,358  |  
|Research and development [note 7(c)]               |  | 1,392,245  |   |  | 909,041    |  
|Amortization                                       |  | 44,861     |   |  | 62,902     |  
|                                                   |  | 3,983,821  |   |  | 2,994,612  |  
|Loss from operations                               |  | (2,404,933 | ) |  | (2,119,068 | )
|Other income (expenses)                            |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Other income [notes 9 and 10]                      |  | 111,741    |   |  | 892        |  
|Interest income                                    |  | 24,959     |   |  | 34,491     |  
|Interest and other expense                         |  | (24,945    | ) |  | (13,289    | )
|Net loss for the
      year                        |  | (2,293,178 | ) |  | (2,096,974 | )
|                                                   |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Net loss per common
      share, basic and diluted |  | (0.05      | ) |  | (0.05      | )
|                                                   |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Weighted average common shares outstanding,        |  |            |   |  |            |  
|basic and diluted                                  |  | 50,136,873 |   |  | 45,761,879 |  

See accompanying notes

F-4

---

DestinyMediaTechnologiesInc.

CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTSOFCHANGESIN
  SHAREHOLDERSEQUITY(DEFICIENCY)

|Years ended August 31 | (Expressed in United States dollars)
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------

|                                               |  |               |  |  |         |  |  |            |  |  |               |   |  | Accumulated |   |  | Total         |  
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- |  |  | ------- |  |  | ---------- |  |  | ------------- | - |  | ----------- | - |  | ------------- | -
|                                               |  |               |  |  |         |  |  | Additional |  |  |               |   |  | other       |   |  | shareholders |  
|                                               |  | Common shares |  |  | paid-in |  |  |            |  |  | comprehensive |   |  | Equity      |  
|                                               |  | Shares        |  |  | Amount  |  |  | capital    |  |  | Deficit       |   |  | income      |   |  | (Deficiency)  |  
|                                               |  | #             |  |  | $       |  |  | $          |  |  | $             |   |  | $           |   |  | $             |  
|                                               |  |               |  |  |         |  |  |            |  |  |               |   |  |             |   |  |               |  
|Balance, August 31, 2006                       |  | 41,936,223    |  |  | 41,938  |  |  | 5,089,760  |  |  | (5,121,293    | ) |  | (111,900    | ) |  | (101,495      | )
|Net loss for the year                          |  |              |  |  |        |  |  |           |  |  | (2,096,974    | ) |  |            |   |  | (2,096,974    | )
|Foreign currency translation gain              |  |              |  |  |        |  |  |           |  |  |              |   |  | 147,627     |   |  | 147,627       |  
|Comprehensive loss                             |  |              |  |  |        |  |  |           |  |  |              |   |  |            |   |  | (1,949,347    | )
|Common shares issued on options exercised      |  | 604,778       |  |  | 605     |  |  | 187,395    |  |  |              |   |  |            |   |  | 188,000       |  
|Common shares issued on warrants exercised     |  | 1,975,000     |  |  | 1,975   |  |  | 503,025    |  |  |              |   |  |            |   |  | 505,000       |  
|Common shares issued through private placement |  | 5,420,000     |  |  | 5,420   |  |  | 1,933,840  |  |  |              |   |  |            |   |  | 1,939,260     |  
|Stock based compensation                       |  |              |  |  |        |  |  | 770,211    |  |  |              |   |  |            |   |  | 770,211       |  
|Balance, August 31, 2007                       |  | 49,936,001    |  |  | 49,938  |  |  | 8,484,231  |  |  | (7,218,267    | ) |  | 35,727      |   |  | 1,351,629     |  
|Net loss for the year                          |  |               |  |  |         |  |  |            |  |  | (2,293,178    | ) |  |             |   |  | (2,293,178    | )
|Foreign currency translation gain              |  |               |  |  |         |  |  |            |  |  |               |   |  | 83,886      |   |  | 83,886        |  
|Comprehensive loss                             |  |               |  |  |         |  |  |            |  |  |               |   |  |             |   |  | (2,209,292    | )
|Common shares issued on options exercised      |  | 672,041       |  |  | 672     |  |  | 259,740    |  |  |              |   |  |            |   |  | 260,412       |  
|Common shares issued through private placement |  | 482,272       |  |  | 482     |  |  | 263,002    |  |  |              |   |  |            |   |  | 263,484       |  
|Stock based compensation                       |  |              |  |  |        |  |  | 201,158    |  |  |              |   |  |            |   |  | 201,158       |  
|Balance, August
      31, 2008                 |  | 51,090,314    |  |  | 51,092  |  |  | 9,208,131  |  |  | (9,511,445    | ) |  | 119,613     |   |  | (132,609      | )

Seeaccompanyingnotes

F-5

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

|Years ended August 31 | (Expressed in United States dollars)
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------

|                                                                     |  | 2008       |   |  | 2007       |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | - |  | ---------- | -
|                                                                     |  | $          |   |  | $          |  
|                                                                     |  |            |   |  |            |  
|OPERATING ACTIVITIES                                                 |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Net loss                                                             |  | (2,293,178 | ) |  | (2,096,974 | )
|Items not involving cash:                                            |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Amortization                                                         |  | 44,861     |   |  | 62,902     |  
|Amortization of deferred lease
      benefit                         |  |           |   |  | (33,576    | )
|Stock-based compensation                                             |  | 201,158    |   |  | 770,211    |  
|Changes in non-cash working capital:                                 |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Accounts and other receivables                                       |  | (69,685    | ) |  | (122,488   | )
|Prepaid expenses                                                     |  | 75,520     |   |  | (173,689   | )
|Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                             |  | 322,143    |   |  | (48,254    | )
|Deferred revenue                                                     |  | 12,012     |   |  | (902       | )
|Net cash used in
      operating activities                          |  | (1,707,169 | ) |  | (1,642,770 | )
|                                                                     |  |            |   |  |            |  
|INVESTING ACTIVITIES                                                 |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Proceeds on disposal of property and equipment                       |  | 1,053      |   |  |           |  
|Purchase of equipment                                                |  | (44,619    | ) |  | (77,849    | )
|Net cash used in investing activities                                |  | (43,566    | ) |  | (77,849    | )
|                                                                     |  |            |   |  |            |  
|FINANCING ACTIVITIES                                                 |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Proceeds (repayments) of shareholder loans                           |  | 44,152     |   |  | (16,944    | )
|Proceeds from exercise of stock options                              |  | 260,412    |   |  | 188,000    |  
|Proceeds from exercise of warrants                                   |  |           |   |  | 505,000    |  
|Proceeds from issuance of common shares net of financing
      costs |  | 263,484    |   |  | 1,954,940  |  
|Net cash provided
      by financing activities                      |  | 568,048    |   |  | 2,630,996  |  
|                                                                     |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash                      |  | 58,873     |   |  | 148,469    |  
|                                                                     |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Net increase (decrease) in cash during the year                      |  | (1,123,814 | ) |  | 1,058,846  |  
|Cash, beginning of year                                              |  | 1,215,183  |   |  | 156,337    |  
|Cash, end of year                                                    |  | 91,369     |   |  | 1,215,183  |  
|                                                                     |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Supplementary disclosure                                             |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Cash paid for interest                                               |  | 8,717      |   |  | 677        |  
|Common shares issued
      on extinguishment of loans                |  |           |   |  | 300,000    |  
|See accompanying notes                                               |  |            |   |  |            |  

F-6

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

1. ORGANIZATION

Destiny Media Technologies Inc. (the Company) was
  incorporated in August 1998 under the laws of the State of Colorado. The Company
  develops technologies that allow for the distribution over the Internet of digital
  media files in either a streaming or digital download format. The technologies
  are proprietary. The Company operates out of Vancouver, BC, Canada and serves
  customers predominantly located in the United States and Canada.

2. GOING CONCERN UNCERTAINTY

The financial statements have been prepared by management in
  accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles on a
  going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge
  of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future.

The Company incurred a net loss of $2,293,178 for the year ended
  August 31, 2008, and has a working capital deficit of $192,772 and a shareholders
  deficiency of $132,609 as at August 31, 2008, that raise doubt its ability to
  continue as a going concern.

During the year ended August 31, 2008, the Company has aggressively
  implemented its business plan of transitioning new and existing customers (record
  labels) to transactional based contracts through the full commercial deployment
  of its Play MPE system. The Company is pursuing transaction
  fee based agreements with other large record labels and has developed an Indie
  Uploader system for smaller labels available on www.myplaympe.com, The Company is encouraged by its revenue
  growth in 2008 and expects revenues and cashflows to improve in fiscal 2009
  as its customers incorporate Play MPE® into their work flow. The Company
  will need to raise additional funds to complete its business plan due to its
  significant working capital deficiency. The Companys goal is to obtain
  these funds through an optimal mix of internal and external financing opportunities
  including cash flows from operations, strategic partnerships, equity financings
  and shareholder loans. There are no assurances that the Company will be successful
  in achieving these goals.

In view of these conditions, the ability of the Company to continue
  as a going concern is not certain. These consolidated financial statements do
  not give effect to any adjustments which would be necessary should the Company
  be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize
  its assets and discharge its liabilities in other than the normal course of
  business and at amounts different from those reflected in the accompanying consolidated
  financial statements.

F-7

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies
  used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements:

Principles of consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
  accounts of the Company, and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Destiny Software
  Productions Inc. and MPE Distribution Inc. All inter-company balances and transactions
  have been eliminated on consolidation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United
  States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
  estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities
  and disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date reported in the consolidated
  financial statements and the amounts of reported revenues and expenditures.
  Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Revenue recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when there is persuasive evidence
  of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable,
  collectibility is reasonably assured, and there are no significant remaining
  performance obligations. The Companys revenue recognition policies are
  in conformity with the AICPAs Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software
  Revenue Recognition, as amended (SOP 97-2).

SOP 97-2 generally requires revenue from software arrangements
  involving multiple elements to be allocated to each element of the arrangement
  based on the relative fair values of the elements, such as software products,
  post-contract customer support, installation or training, and to be recognized
  as the element is delivered and the Company has no significant remaining performance
  obligations. The determination of fair value is based on objective evidence
  that is specific to the vendor. If evidence of fair value for each element of
  the arrangement does not exist, and the only outstanding deliverable is post-customer
  support, all revenue from the arrangement is recognized ratably over the term
  of the arrangement.

License revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence
  of an arrangement and delivery to the customer has occurred, and provided the
  arrangement does not require significant customization of the software, the
  fee is fixed and determinable, and collectability is considered probable.

F-8

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (contd.)

Service revenue from maintenance contracts is recognized ratably
  over the term of the maintenance contract, on a straight-line basis. Other service
  revenue is recognized at the time the service is performed.

The Company recognizes product revenue upon transfer of title,
  which occurs on shipment of product, as all other revenue recognition criteria
  are satisfied. When significant post-delivery obligations exist, revenue is
  deferred until such obligations are fulfilled. Cash received in advance of meeting
  the revenue recognition criteria is recorded as deferred revenue.

Royalty revenue from third party sales is recognized when there
  is persuasive evidence that the arrangement is complete, and only when all deliverables
  have been performed.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts through
  review of open accounts, and historical collection and allowance amounts. The
  allowance for doubtful accounts is intended to reduce trade accounts receivable
  to the amount that reasonably approximates their fair value due to their short-term
  nature. The Companys exposure to credit risk has increased as a result
  of global market conditions and increased revenue. This has been reflected in
  an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts to $55,365 (2007 - $5,221).
  The amount ultimately realized from trade accounts receivable may differ from
  the amount estimated in the consolidated financial statements based on collection
  experience.

Research and development costs

Research costs are expensed as incurred. Software and related
  development costs incurred are charged to expense until the technological feasibility
  of the product has been established. After technological feasibility is established
  and until the product is available for general release, software development,
  product enhancements and acquisition costs are capitalized and amortized on
  a product-by-product basis over the estimated economic life of the product,
  not to exceed three years. The software development costs that are capitalized
  are assessed for impairment on a periodic basis.

F-9

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (contd.)

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Amortization is taken
  over the estimated useful lives of the assets and is calculated using the declining
  balance method at the following annual rates, commencing upon utilization of
  the assets:

Furniture and fixtures
      20%Computer hardware
      30%Computer software
      100%Leasehold improvements
      Straight-line over lease term


Translation of foreign currencies

The Companys functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Financial
  statements of foreign operations for which the functional currency is the local
  currency are translated into U.S. dollars with assets and liabilities translated
  at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date and revenue and
  expense items translated at the average rates for the period. Unrealized gains
  and losses resulting from the translation of the consolidated financial statements
  are deferred and accumulated in a separate component of shareholders equity
  (deficiency) as a foreign currency translation gain (loss) in accumulated other
  comprehensive income.

Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated
  at the exchange rate in effect on the respective transaction date and gains
  and losses are reflected in the statement of operations.

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $365,384
  and $188,474 during the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

F-10

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (contd.)

Income taxes

The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income
  taxes. Under this method, the deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined
  based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets
  and liabilities using substantively enacted tax rates that will be in effect
  for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Beginning on
  September 1, 2007, the Company also adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting
  Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
  Taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance
  with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement 109, Accounting for
  Income Taxes(FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold
  and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement
  of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also
  provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
  accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company and its
  subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax, Canadian income tax, as
  well as income tax of multiple state and local jurisdictions. Based on the Companys
  evaluation, the Company has concluded that there are no significant uncertain
  tax positions requiring recognition in the Companys financial statements.
  The Companys evaluation was performed for the tax years ended August 31,
  1999 through August 31, 2008, the tax years which remain subject to examination
  by major tax jurisdictions. The Company may from time to time be assessed interest
  or penalties by major tax jurisdictions, although any such assessments historically
  have been minimal and immaterial to the Companys financial results. In
  the event the Company has received an assessment for interest and/or penalties,
  it has been classified in the financial statements as selling, general and administrative
  expense.

Capital stock or equivalent issued for consideration other
  than cash

Capital stock or equivalent issued for consideration other than
  cash is recorded at an estimate of the fair value of the stock or equivalent
  issued or issuable or at an estimate of the fair value of the goods or services
  received, whichever is more readily ascertainable.

F-11

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (contd.)

Stock based compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation arrangements
  in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) Share-Based
  Payment (FAS 123(R)). Under the fair value recognition provisions
  of FAS 123(R), stock based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date
  based on the fair value of the awards expected to vest and recognized as expense
  ratably over the requisite service period of the award. The Company has used
  the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of its stock-based
  awards which requires various judgmental assumptions including estimating stock
  price volatility and expected life. The Companys computation of expected
  volatility is based on a combination of historical and market-based implied
  volatility. In addition, the Company considers many factors when estimating
  expected life, including types of awards and historical experience. If any of
  the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model change significantly,
  stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that
  recorded in the current period.

Loss per share

Basic and diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net
  loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding for the period.

Comprehensive loss

Comprehensive loss includes all changes in equity except those
  resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Accumulated
  other comprehensive income consists only of accumulated foreign currency translation
  adjustments for all years presented.

Comparative amounts

Certain of the comparative amounts have been reclassified to
  conform to the presentation adopted in the current period.

F-12

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (contd.)

Recent accounting pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 Fair Value
  Measurements (FAS 157). This Statement defines fair value,
  establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about
  fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements
  that require or permit fair value measurements, the Board having previously
  concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant
  measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new
  fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this
  Statement will change current practice. This Statement is effective for fiscal
  years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt FAS 157 effective
  September 1, 2008 and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact
  on the Companys consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 The Fair
  Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities  including
  an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (FAS 159) which permits
  entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
  at fair value. This statement is effective for fiscal periods beginning after
  November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt FAS 159 effective September 1, 2008
  and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the Companys
  consolidated financial statements.

F-13

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

|                       |  |         |  |  | Accumulated  |  |  | Net book | 
|---------------------- |  | ------- |  |  | ------------ |  |  | -------- | 
|                       |  | Cost    |  |  | amortization |  |  | value    | 
|                       |  | $       |  |  | $            |  |  | $        | 
|                       |  |         |  |  |              |  |  |          | 
|2008                   |  |         |  |  |              |  |  |          | 
|Furniture and fixtures |  | 102,385 |  |  | 70,765       |  |  | 31,620   | 
|Computer hardware      |  | 277,725 |  |  | 206,029      |  |  | 71,696   | 
|Computer software      |  | 32,390  |  |  | 27,337       |  |  | 5,053    | 
|Leasehold improvements |  | 4,397   |  |  | 1,466        |  |  | 2,931    | 
|                       |  | 416,897 |  |  | 305,597      |  |  | 111,300  | 
|                       |  |         |  |  |              |  |  |          | 
|2007                   |  |         |  |  |              |  |  |          | 
|Furniture and fixtures |  | 91,709  |  |  | 63,354       |  |  | 28,355   | 
|Computer hardware      |  | 250,966 |  |  | 177,808      |  |  | 73,158   | 
|Computer software      |  | 27,637  |  |  | 22,899       |  |  | 4,738    | 
|Leasehold improvements |  | 5,656   |  |  |             |  |  | 5,656    | 
|                       |  | 375,968 |  |  | 264,061      |  |  | 111,907  | 

5. SHAREHOLDER LOAN PAYABLE

|                                              |  | 2008   |  |  | 2007 | 
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------ |  |  | ---- | 
|                                              |  | $      |  |  | $    | 
|                                              |  |        |  |  |      | 
|Shareholder loan payable, unsecured,          |  |        |  |  |      | 
|due on
      demand, interest bearing at 5.5% |  | 44,152 |  |  |     | 
|                                              |  | 44,152 |  |  |     | 

The Company has received a loan in the amount of $47,000CDN from
  its Chief Financial Officer, Fred Vandenberg, who is a shareholder. The loan
  is due on demand and bears interest at 5.5% .

6. OBLIGATION FOR SHARE SETTLEMENT

During the year ended August 31, 2003, the Company issued 133,333
  common shares to be delivered in settlement for proceeds of $100,000 received
  in respect of a private placement that was not completed in August 2000. As
  the private placement was not completed and although management expects that
  the amount ultimately will be settled through the release of the shares, the
  obligation for share settlement is recorded as a liability until a settlement
  is finalized between the Company and parties involved in the August 2000 private
  placement.

F-14

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

7. SHARE CAPITAL

[a] Authorized

The Company is authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of
  common shares, par value $0.001 per share.

[b] Common shares issued

2008

During the year ended August 31, 2008, the Company issued 482,272
  units for net cash proceeds of $263,464. As part of the issuance, the Company
  issued 235,250 warrants at $0.60 expiring November 30, 2009 and 5,886 warrants
  at $0.50 expiring January 31, 2010. Also, 672,041 stock options were exercised
  during the year ended August 31, 2008 for cash proceeds of $260,412.

2007

During the year ended August 31, 2007, the Company completed
  a private placement which consisted of the issuance of 5,400,000 units at $0.40
  for net cash proceeds of $1,939,260. Each unit consists of one common share
  and one warrant exercisable into one common share at $0.50 expiring February
  28, 2012. In connection with the private placement, the Company incurred $220,740
  of financing and share issuance costs [of which $15,681 is included in accounts
  payable at the end of the year] and issued as compensation an additional 20,000
  common shares, 361,000 warrants exercisable into common shares at $0.40 expiring
  February 28, 2012, and 400,000 warrants exercisable into common shares at $0.50
  expiring February 28, 2012.

During the year ended August 31, 2007, 604,778 stock options
  were exercised for cash proceeds of $188,000, 1,750,000 $0.25 warrants were
  exercised for gross proceeds of $437,500 and 225,000 $0.30 warrants were exercised
  for gross proceeds of $67,500.

F-15

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

7. SHARE CAPITAL (contd.)

[c] Stock options

The Company has reserved a total of 8,850,000 common shares for
  issuance under its two existing stock option plans (the Plans),
  of which 916,334 common shares remain available for future option issuance.
  The options generally vest over a range of periods from the date of grant, some
  are immediate, and others are 12 or 24 months. Any options that do not vest
  as the result of a grantee leaving the Company are forfeited and the common
  shares underlying them are returned to the reserve. The options generally have
  a contractual term of five years.

Stock-Based Payment Award Activity

A summary of option activity under the Plans as of August 31,
  2008, and changes during the year ended is presented below:

|                               |  |           |   |  |                |   |  | Weighted    |  |  |           | 
|------------------------------ |  | --------- | - |  | -------------- | - |  | ----------- |  |  | --------- | 
|                               |  |           |   |  |                |   |  | Average     |  |  |           | 
|                               |  |           |   |  | Weighted       |   |  | Remaining   |  |  | Intrinsic | 
|                               |  |           |   |  | Average        |   |  | Contractual |  |  | Value     | 
|Options                        |  | Shares    |   |  | Exercise Price |   |  | Term        |  |  | $         | 
|Outstanding at August 31, 2007 |  | 4,287,000 |   |  | 0.42           |   |  |             |  |  |           | 
|Granted                        |  | 859,041   |   |  | 0.41           |   |  |             |  |  |           | 
|Exercised                      |  | (672,041  | ) |  | (0.39          | ) |  |             |  |  |           | 
|Expired                        |  | (135,000  | ) |  | (0.43          | ) |  |             |  |  |           | 
|Outstanding at August 31, 2008 |  | 4,339,000 |   |  | 0.48           |   |  | 2.83        |  |  | 179,850   | 
|Vested at August 31, 2008      |  | 3,961,537 |   |  | 0.47           |   |  | 2.73        |  |  | 166,725   | 
|Exercisable at August 31, 2008 |  | 3,961,537 |   |  | 0.47           |   |  | 2.73        |  |  | 166,725   | 

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference
  between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of
  the Companys common shares for the options that were in-the-money at August
  31, 2008.

F-16

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

7. SHARE CAPITAL (contd.)

As FAS123(R) requires that stock-based compensation expense be
  based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest, stock-based compensation
  expense for the year ended August 31, 2008 has considerations for estimated
  forfeitures. When estimating forfeitures, the Company considers voluntary termination
  behavior as well as trends of actual option forfeitures.

Total stock-based compensation for the year ended August 31,
  2008 includes stock-based compensation expense related to employees of $176,179
  (2007-$328,155) and stock-based-compensation expense related to consultants
  of $24,980 (2007- $442,056) reported in the consolidated statements of operations
  as follows:

|                               |  | 2008    |  |  | 2007    | 
|------------------------------ |  | ------- |  |  | ------- | 
|                               |  | $       |  |  | $       | 
|Stock-based compensation       |  |         |  |  |         | 
|General and administrative     |  | 47,205  |  |  | 97,100  | 
|Sales and marketing            |  | 91,285  |  |  | 513,182 | 
|Research
      and development |  | 62,668  |  |  | 159,929 | 
|Total stock-based compensation |  | 201,158 |  |  | 770,211 | 

Valuation Assumptions

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date
  of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following
  assumptions:

|                                       |  | 2008          |  |  | 2007       | 
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------- |  |  | ---------- | 
|                                       |  | $             |  |  | $          | 
|Expected term of stock options (years) |  | 2.5-5.0       |  |  | 2.5-5.0    | 
|Expected volatility                    |  | 85% - 92%     |  |  | 85%-94%    | 
|Risk-free interest rate                |  | 2.31% - 4.51% |  |  | 3.9%-5.04% | 
|Dividend yields                        |  |              |  |  |           | 

F-17

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

7. SHARE CAPITAL (contd.)

Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the
  Companys stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise
  and employee termination within the valuation model. The expected term of options
  granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be
  outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the
  options is based on US Treasury bill rates in effect at the time of grant.

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted
  during the year ended August 31, 2008 and 2007 was $0.24 and $0.22, respectively.

As at August 31, 2008, there was $103,203 of unrecognized stock-based
  compensation cost related to employee stock options granted under the Plans,
  which is expected to be fully recognized over the next 12-24 months.

[d] Warrants

As at August 31, 2008, the Company has the following common shares
  warrants outstanding:

|               | Number of Common | Exercise Price |                    
|-------------- | ---------------- | -------------- | -------------------
|               | Shares Issuable  | $              | Date of Expiry     
|               |                  |                |                    
|$0.22 Warrants | 950,000          | 0.22           | August 25, 2011    
|$0.40 Warrants | 361,000          | 0.40           | February 28, 2012  
|$0.50 Warrants | 5,886            | 0.50           | January 31, 2010   
|$0.50 Warrants | 5,800,000        | 0.50           | February 28, 2012  
|$0.60 Warrants | 235,250          | 0.60           | November 30, 2009  
|$0.70 Warrants | 500,000          | 0.70           | April
      9, 2012
|               | 7,852,136        |                |                    

F-18

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

7. SHARE CAPITAL (contd.)

5,400,000 of the $0.50 warrants have a forced conversion feature
  by which the Company can demand exercise of the share purchase warrants if the
  common shares trades at a price equal to or greater than $1.25 if certain conditions
  are met.

All of the $0.60 warrants have a forced conversion feature by
  which the Company can demand exercise of the share purchase warrants if the
  common shares trades at a price equal to or greater than $0.80 if certain conditions
  are met.

On September 11, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement
  with Bryant Park Capital to act as an exclusive financial advisor to provide
  strategic assistance and maximize shareholder value. As part of the agreement,
  the Company issued 950,000 warrants with a strike price of $0.22. On April 9,
  2007, the Company modified and expanded its agreement with Bryant Park Capital
  to include additional services not previously contemplated in the original agreement.
  As compensation, the Company issued an additional 500,000 warrants exercisable
  into common shares at a price of $0.70. The warrants are fully vested.

8. INCOME TAXES

The Company is subject to United States federal and state income
  taxes at an approximate rate of 39.63% and to Canadian federal and British Columbia
  provincial taxes in Canada at an approximate rate of 33%. The reconciliation
  of the provision (recovery) for income taxes at the United States federal statutoryrate
  compared to the Companys income tax expense is as follows:

|                                         |  | 2008     |   |  | 2007     |  
|---------------------------------------- |  | -------- | - |  | -------- | -
|                                         |  | $        |   |  | $        |  
|                                         |  |          |   |  |          |  
|Tax recovery at U.S.statutory rate       |  | (909,000 | ) |  | (833,000 | )
|                                         |  |          |   |  |          |  
|Permanent differences                    |  | 82,000   |   |  | 375,000  |  
|Effect of lower foreign tax in Canada    |  | 109,000  |   |  | 50,000   |  
|Other adjustments to valuation allowance |  | 718,000  |   |  | 408,000  |  
|Income tax expense
      (recovery)      |  |         |   |  |         |  

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
  differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
  reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The Company
  has recognized a valuation allowance for those deferred tax assets for which
  realization is not more likely than not to occur.

F-19

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

8. INCOME TAXES (contd.)

Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets
  as of August 31 are as follows:

|                                           |  | 2008       |   |  | 2007       |  
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---------- | - |  | ---------- | -
|                                           |  | $          |   |  | $          |  
|                                           |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Deferred tax assets:                       |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Net operating loss carryforwards           |  | 2,073,000  |   |  | 1,732,000  |  
|Excess of book over
      tax depreciation |  | 71,000     |   |  | 70,000     |  
|Total deferred tax asset                   |  | 2,144,000  |   |  | 1,802,000  |  
|Valuation allowance                        |  | (2,144,000 | ) |  | (1,802,000 | )
|Net deferred tax asset                     |  |           |   |  |           |  

Net loss by geographic region is as follows:

|              |  | 2008       |   |  | 2007       |  
|------------- |  | ---------- | - |  | ---------- | -
|              |  | $          |   |  | $          |  
|              |  |            |   |  |            |  
|United States |  | (742,606   | ) |  | (1,129,942 | )
|Canada        |  | (1,550,572 | ) |  | (967,032   | )
|              |  | (2,293,178 | ) |  | (2,096,974 | )

If not utilized to reduce future taxable income, the Companys
  net operating loss carryforwards will expire as follows:

|                    |  | Canada    |  |  | United States | 
|------------------- |  | --------- |  |  | ------------- | 
|                    |  | $         |  |  | $             | 
|                    |  |           |  |  |               | 
|2009                |  | 108,000   |  |  |              | 
|2015                |  | 262,000   |  |  |              | 
|2019 and thereafter |  | 2,548,000 |  |  | 3,043,000     | 
|                    |  | 2,918,000 |  |  | 3,043,000     | 

Pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, use of
  the Companys net operating loss carryforwards may be limited if the Company
  experiences a cumulative change in ownership of greater than 50% in a moving
  three-year period. Ownership changes could impact the Companys ability
  to utilize net operating losses and credit carryforwards remaining at the ownership
  change date. The limitation will be determined by the fair market value of common
  shares outstanding prior to the ownership change, multiplied by the applicable
  federal rate.

F-20

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

9. COMMITMENTS

The Company is committed to payments under its premises lease,
  which expires on August 30, 2010 as follows:

|     |  | $       | 
|---- |  | ------- | 
|     |  |         | 
|2009 |  | 273,713 | 
|2010 |  | 273,713 | 
|     |  | 547,426 | 

The Company has entered into sublease agreements (note 10) to
  offset the cost commitments above. All sublease income has been reported in
  other income in the consolidated statements of operations and has not been reflected
  in the amounts disclosed above.

10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the year ended August 31, 2008, the Company entered into
  a sublease agreement with a Director effective September 1, 2007. The term of
  the sublease is one year expiring on August 31, 2008, and calls for committed
  monthly payments of $6,016 which offsets its lease cost. Thereafter the sublease
  is month to month with a two month notice period. A deposit of $12,260 has been
  received which will be applied to the last two months lease payments. The rent
  deposit is included in accrued liabilities.

11. CONTINGENCIES

On March 7, 2006, the Company filed a statement of claim in the
  Federal Court of Canada against Yangaroo Inc. (formerly Musicrypt Inc.) (the
  Defendant) to assert that the Companys technology does not
  infringe on the stated patent owned by the Defendant and to further declare
  that Defendants patent is invalid. This statement of claim was initiated
  by the Company as a result of the Defendants statements to the contrary.
  On June 7, 2006, the Companys counsel received a statement of defense
  and counterclaim from the defendant, requesting specified damages or audited
  Canadian profits from the Play MPE® system if it is offered in Canada.

On January 11, 2007, the Federal Court of Canada issued a bifurcation
  order of the issues included in the action. Accordingly, only the issues of
  infringement and validity of the patent raised in the claim will be addressed
  in the current proceeding. The remaining issues including the

F-21

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

11. CONTINGENCIES (contd.)

counterclaim for specified damages will be the subject of a separate
  determination to be conducted after the trial if it then appears that such issues
  need to be decided.

On May 3, 2007, the Company filed a statement of claim in Ontario
  Superior Court for damages against the Defendant (Yangaroo Inc.), and executives
  of the Defendant, John Heaven and Clifford Hunt (collectively the Defendants)
  in the amount of $25,000,000 caused by the Defendants making statements constituting
  defamation and injurious falsehood, making false or misleading statements tending
  to discredit the business, making false or misleading representations contrary
  to the Competition Act of Canada, and unlawful interference with the Companys
  economic relations. The statement further requests an injunction from continuing
  the actions instigating the statement of claim.

On June 7, 2007, the Defendant filed a statement of defense,
  denying the allegations set out in the statement of claim dated May 3, 2007,
  and counterclaim against the Company and its Chief Executive Officer, Steve
  Vestergaard, also in the amount of $25,000,000, for making statements constituting
  defamation and injurious falsehood, making false or misleading statements tending
  to discredit the business, making false or misleading representations contrary
  to the Competition Act, and unlawful interference with the Defendants
  economic relations. The Company further requests an injunction from continuing
  the defamatory actions.

The amount of damages awarded to either party, if any, in relation
  to the statement of claim or counterclaim cannot be reasonably estimated and
  no amount has been recognized in the financial statements. Management believes
  that all of the Defendants claims are without merit and it is unlikely that
  the outcome of this matter will have an adverse impact on its result of operations
  and financial condition.

12. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair value disclosures

The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable
  and accrued liabilities, and shareholder loan payable, approximate their fair
  values due to the relatively short periods to maturity of the instruments.

Foreign currency risk

The Company operates internationally, which gives rise to the
  risk that cash flows may be adversely impacted by exchange rate fluctuations.
  The Company has not entered into contracts for foreign exchange hedges.

F-22

---

Destiny Media Technologies Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2008 and 2007

13. SEGMENTED INFORMATION AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE

The Company operates solely in the digital media software segment
  and all revenue from its products and services are made in this segment.

Revenue from external customers, by product and location of customer,
  is as follows:

|                                           |  | 2008      |  |  | 2007    | 
|------------------------------------------ |  | --------- |  |  | ------- | 
|                                           |  | $         |  |  | $       | 
|                                           |  |           |  |  |         | 
|MPE®                                       |  |           |  |  |         | 
|                                           |  |           |  |  |         | 
|United States                              |  | 1,126,819 |  |  | 442,053 | 
|Canada                                     |  | 103,175   |  |  | 64,603  | 
|Other                                      |  | 19,933    |  |  | -       | 
|Total MPE® Revenue                         |  | 1,249,927 |  |  | 506,656 | 
|                                           |  |           |  |  |         | 
|Clipstream ® & Radio Destiny               |  |           |  |  |         | 
|                                           |  |           |  |  |         | 
|United States                              |  | 273,250   |  |  | 311,862 | 
|Canada                                     |  | 36,501    |  |  | 34,355  | 
|Other                                      |  | 19,210    |  |  | 22,671  | 
|Total Clipstream ® & Radio Destiny Revenue |  | 328,961   |  |  | 368,888 | 
|                                           |  |           |  |  |         | 
|Total Revenue                              |  | 1,578,888 |  |  | 875,544 | 

During the year ended August 31, 2008, one customer represented
  46% of the total revenue balance [2007 - one customer represented 31%].

As at August 31, 2008, two customers represent 35% of the trade
  accounts receivables balance of $357,938 [2007  one customer represented
  62%].

The Company has substantially all its assets in Canada and its
  current and planned future operations are, and will be, located in Canada.

F-23

---

|ITEM 8. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH
      ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not applicable.

|ITEM 8A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
|-------- | ------------------------

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company are responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded, based on our evaluation,
that they are effective as at August 31, 2008 to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under Canadian and United
States securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the same period specified in those rules and regulations.

Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company are responsible for designing internal controls over financial
reporting, or causing them to be designed under their supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.

Using the framework provided by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations (COSO), the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of the internal controls over financial reporting as at August 31, 2008 and
concluded that there are material weaknesses in internal controls over financial
reporting, which are as follows:

- Due to the limited number of staff resources, the Company believes there
  are instances where a lack of segregation of duties exist to provide effective
  controls;
- Our audit committee does not have a financial expert and is not
  independent; and
- Due to the limited number of staff resources, the Company may not have the
  necessary in- house knowledge to address complex accounting and tax issues
  that may arise.

As a result of these weaknesses, the Companys internal
controls over financial reporting are not effective. The weaknesses and their
related risks are not uncommon in a company the size of Destiny Media because of
limitations in size and number of staff. The Company believes it has taken
initial steps to mitigate these risks by consulting outside advisors and
involving the Audit Committee and Board of Directors in reviews and
consultations where necessary. However, these weaknesses in internal controls
over financial reporting could result in a more than remote likelihood that a
material misstatement would not be prevented or detected. The Company believes
that it must take additional steps to further mitigate these risks by consulting
outside advisors on a more regular and timely basis.

21

---

This annual report does not include an attestation report of
the Companys independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal
control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to
attestation by the Companys independent registered public accounting firm
pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only
managements report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the period covered by this annual report, there have
been no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting that
occurred that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.

|ITEM 8B. | OTHER INFORMATION.
|-------- | ------------------

None.

PART III

|ITEM 9. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS
      AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF
      THE EXCHANGE ACT.
|------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table sets forth the names, positions and ages of
our executive officers and directors. All our directors serve until the next
annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected and
qualify. The Board of Directors elects officers and their terms of office are,
except to the extent governed by employment contract, at the discretion of the
Board of Directors.

Name
    Position Held with the Company
    Age
    Date First Elected or AppointedSteven
      Vestergaard(1)
    Chief Executive Officer and Director
    42
    January 1999Frederick Vandenberg
    Chief Financial Officer
      and Corporate Secretary
    40
    July 2007Edward Kolic(1)
    Director
    47
    February 1999Lawrence J. Langs
    Director
    47
    November 2000Yoshitaro Kumagai
    Director
    62
    August 2001Wayne Koshman(1)
    Director
    46
    May 2002


(1) Members of our Audit Committee

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and
business experience of each of our executive officers and directors for the past
five years:

Steven Vestergaard.Mr. Vestergaard is our President,
Chief Executive Officer and is one of our directors. Mr. Vestergaard has been
our Chief Executive Officer from May 1999, when we began negotiations to
purchase our operating subsidiary, Destiny Software, from Mr. Vestergaard, to
January 2001 and then again from February 2002 to present. Mr. Vestergaards
responsibilities include overall management of our business and coordinating
strategy, planning, and product development. Mr. Vestergaard started Destiny
Software as a private company owned by Mr. Vestergaard in 1991 and developed its
business through to 1999 when it was acquired by us. At Destiny Software, Mr.
Vestergaard was responsible for overall business management and supervision of
the development of computer games. During this period, Destiny Software was
successful in the production of a dozen successful video games, including Blood
Bowl, Creepers and Dark Seed II, for major publishers, including Microleague,
Sony and MGM. Mr. Vestergaard has been involved in the software development
industry since 1982 when he founded a private company called Tronic Software.
Tronic Software was a developer of computer games which were sold by mail order.
In 1990 he became employed as a software engineer by Distinctive Software Inc.,
a company that later changed its name to Electronic Arts Canada, where he was
involved in developing game products. Mr. Vestergaard holds an International
Baccalaureate Degree and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Computer Science from
the University of British Columbia.

22

---

Fred Vandenberg, B. Comm. MBA, CAMr. Vandenberg is our
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Vandenbergs core
responsibilities include leading the accounting, treasury, strategic planning,
financial controls and financial reporting functions of our company. With over
14 years of public accounting experience, Mr. Vandenberg brings a wealth of
experience in tax, financial reporting and mergers and acquisitions. Mr.
Vandenberg completed the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants In-depth
taxation program while with Ernst & Young in 1998. Mr. Vandenberg holds a
Bachelor of Commerce degree and a Master of Business Administration (Finance)
from McMaster University and a Chartered Accountant designation.

Edward Kolic. Mr. Edward Kolic has been one of our
directors since February 1999. Mr. Kolic served as our chief operating officer
from February 1999 to October 2001 during which time he was responsible for our
overall product strategy and development of our core technologies. Mr. Kolic
currently consults to senior management of companies developing Internet media
technologies and distributing digital content. Mr. Kolic served as our secretary
from February 1999 to July 2007. From 1997 until June of 1999, Mr. Kolic was the
president of WonderFall Productions Inc., a computer game development company
built by Mr. Kolic and which we purchased in June 1999. From 1993 until 1997,
Mr. Kolic was a partner in a private company called Jacqueline Conoir Designs
Ltd. which is a fashion design house. At Jacqueline Conoir Designs Ltd., Mr.
Kolic was general manager and vice-president of marketing and developed all of
the marketing, communications and image strategies for the company. From 1988
until 1995, Mr. Kolic was employed as the president of Target Canada Production
Ltd., a company engaged in the development and distribution of educational video
resources to the North American schools market. His experience includes the
production of documentary television, educational and information programming
for the Canadian Educational Television Networks, large screen interactive
presentation media for international conferences and a range of communication
programs for corporate, government and institutional clients.

Lawrence J. Langs. Mr. Langs has been one of our
directors since November 2000. Mr. Langs most recently worked as vice-president
of business development at MP3.com. Prior to MP3.com, Mr. Langs had a variety of
experience as a technology and entertainment lawyer and a senior management
consultant as well as a technology advocate. Mr. Langs worked with his
associates at Interactive Media Consulting as legal and business counsel
exclusively to clients in the interactive media industry since 1991. Projects
undertaken by Mr. Langs included joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions,
corporate structuring, intellectual property, licensing and royalties, venture
funding and finance. From 1995 to 1996, Mr. Langs was acting business
development manager for the New Media Division of Sybase, where he was involved
with strategic interactive television initiatives and with developing and
executing strategic relationships with Internet companies. Prior experience also
includes several years as an Investment Banker for Chemical Bank in New York,
and as a Senior Strategic Consultant for Arthur D. Little in Boston. Mr. Langs
holds a Juris Doctorate from Boston University School of Law, and a Master's
Degree in Finance and Management of Technology from the Sloan School of
Management at M.I.T. Mr. Langs is a member of the New York Bar.

Yoshitaro Kumagai. Mr. Kumagai was appointed as one of
our directors in August of 2001. Mr. Kumagai is a highly respected executive in
the high-technology industry with over twenty years of experience in the
electronics and consumer fields. Mr. Kumagai is currently the interim chief
executive officer of Display Research Laboratories, a company involved in the
development of organic flat panel display technologies. Mr. Kumagai was the
interim chief executive officer and president of Onna.com, a company engaged in
the development of a Japanese portal web site targeted at Japanese women, from
1999 to 2001 when the business was acquired in an acquisition. Mr. Kumagai was
the chairman and chief executive officer of Vivitar Corporation from 1997 to
1999. Vivitar is a global consumer electronics corporation. Mr. Kumagai was
responsible for the management of global operations throughout the United
States, Europe and Asia. Mr. Kumagai was an advisor and a corporate director of
Plaza Create Ltd., a Japanese company engaged in franchising an innovative
photograph processing store chain, from 1995 to 1999. Mr. Kumagai has also held
key management positions in the following companies: IDEC Corporation (from 1991
to 1993), the Mead Corporation (from 1984 to 1991) and the Singer Company (from
1981 to 1986). Mr. Kumagai holds a bachelor of science degree from Georgia State
University and a BSME from Hosei University in Tokyo, Japan.

Wayne Koshman. Mr. Koshman was appointed as one of our
directors on May 29, 2002. Mr. Koshman has been a director and the chief
executive officer of Terrawest Management Inc., a company engaged in mining and
exploration in China, from June 2002 to present. Mr. Koshman was the director of
GIS Technologies, a company engaged in the development of smartcard technology,
from November 2000 to March 2002. Mr. Koshman was a project consultant for
Zaatec Technologies Inc., a Japanese hard disk technology firm, from March 1999
to April 2000. Mr. Koshman was the head of corporate development for
international sales for Moduline Industries Ltd., a subsidiary of Champion
Industries, a large home manufacturer, from March 1998 to June 1999. Mr. Koshman
was the international sales manager for Asia for Nortec Design group from
November 1996 to February 1998. Mr. Koshman is a founder of Skytech Bio
Conversion Inc., a

23

---

biotechnology company working with the National Research
Council of Canada and the University of British Columbia on phase one trials of
microbial technology for treating organic solids.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Our directors are elected by our shareholders at our annual
general meetings. Each director holds office until our next annual general
meeting or until the director resigns or is removed in accordance with our
bylaws. We do not have a classified Board of Directors.

Our officers serve at the discretion of our Board of
Directors.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Our directors are reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses in connection with attendance at Board of Director and committee
meetings. In addition, our directors are eligible for grants of options to
purchase shares of our common stock at the discretion of our Board of
Directors.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Our audit committee consists of Mr. Steven Vestergaard, our
Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Edward Kolic, and Mr. Wayne Koshman, two of which
are independent. We currently do not have a financial expert on the audit
committee.

FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS

There are no family relationships among our officers and
directors.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive
officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent
of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, directors and greater
than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on its review of the copies
of such forms received by us, we believe that during the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2008 all such filing requirements applicable to our officers and
directors were complied with.

CODE OF ETHICS

The Companys code of ethics is available on our website at
http://www.dsny.com/investor/

24



---

|ITEM 10. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
|-------- | -----------------------

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth certain compensation information
as to Mr. Steven Vestergaard, our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Vandenberg,
our Chief Financial Officer. No person other than Mr. Vestergaard acted as our
Chief Executive Officer during our last fiscal year ended August 31, 2008. No
other compensation was paid to Mr. Vestergaard other than the compensation set
forth below.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION
      TABLEANNUAL COMPENSATION
    LONG TERM COMPENSATION(3)Name
    Title
    Year
    Salary
    Bonus
    Other Annual Compensation
    AWARDS
    PAYOUTS
    All Other Compen- sationRestricted Stock Awarded
    Options/ SARs * (#)
    LTIP payouts ($)Steven Vestergaard (1), (2)
    Director President CEO
    2008 
      2007 2006
    $153,954 $113,666
      $83,848
    $38,489 0 0
    0 0 0
    0 
      0 0
    0 300,000 0
    0 
      0 0
    0 
    0 0Frederick Vandenberg (4)
    CFO & Corporate Secretary
    2008 
      2007
    $124,157 $27,869
    $31,039 0
    0 0
    0 
      0
    0 0
    0 
      0
    0 
    0


Notes to Summary Compensation Table:

|(1) | All salaries paid to Mr. Vestergaard are paid in Canadian
      dollars.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | Compensation is stated in United States dollars and is
      based on an exchange rate of $0.9933 US dollars for each $1.00 Canadian
      dollar.                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(3) | The value of benefits that do not exceed 10% of total
      annual salary are not reported herein.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(4) | All salaries paid to Mr. Vandenberg are paid in Canadian
      dollars. Mr. Vandenberg became an employee of the Company on June 1, 2007
      and assumed the position of Chief Financial Officer effective July 16,
      2007. All shares owned by Mr. Vandenberg were acquired in purchases by Mr.
      Vandenberg in fair market value transactions.

STOCK OPTION GRANTS

There were no new options grants to executives in 2008.

EXERCISES OF STOCK OPTIONS AND YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

None

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS

We do not have any long-term incentive plans other than the
registered stock option plans.

25

---

EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS

We are not party to any written employment agreement with Mr.
Vestergaard. We do not have any agreements with Mr. Vestergaard regarding the
payments of bonus or other performance incentives. Mr. Vestergaard is eligible
to receive stock options as and when approved by our Board of Directors.

We are not aware of any change in control arrangement with Mr.
Vestergaard.

We are not party to any written employment agreement with Mr.
Vandenberg. We do not have any agreements with Mr. Vandenberg regarding the
payments of bonus or other performance incentives. Mr. Vandenberg is eligible to
receive stock options as and when approved by our Board of Directors.

We are not aware of any change in control arrangement with Mr.
Vandenberg.

26

---

|ITEM 11. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
      OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
|-------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table sets forth certain information concerning
the number of shares of our common stock owned beneficially as of November 18,
2008 by: (i) each person (including any group) known to us to own more than five
percent (5%) of any class of our voting securities, (ii) each of our directors
and each of our named executive officers, and (iii) officers and directors as a
group. Unless otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed possess sole voting
and investment power with respect to the shares shown.

Title of class
    Name and address of beneficial owner
    Number of Shares of Common Stock
    Percentage of Common Stock(1)DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS:Common Stock
    Steven Vestergaard President, Chief
      Executive Officer c/o 800-570 Granville St. Vancouver, BC, V6C 3P1
    11,056,355(7)
    21.6%Common Stock
    Frederick Vandenberg Chief Financial
      Officer and Corporate Secretary c/o 800-570 Granville St.
      Vancouver, BC, V6C 3P1
    745,000(2)
    1.5%Common Stock
    Edward Kolic Director c/o 800-570
      Granville St. Vancouver, BC, V6C 3P1
    461,300 (3)
    0.9%Common Stock
    Lawrence J. Langs Director c/o 800-570
      Granville St. Vancouver, BC, V6C 3P1
    300,000 (4)
    0.6%Common Stock
    Yoshitaro Kumagai Director c/o 800-570
      Granville St. Vancouver, BC, V6C 3P1
    400,000 (5)
    0.8%Common Stock
    Wayne Koshman Director c/o 800-570
      Granville St. Vancouver, BC, V6C 3P1
    355,000 (6)
    0.7%Common Stock
    All Officers and Directors as a Group (6
      persons)
    13,317,655
    26.0%5%
      SHAREHOLDERSCommon Stock
    Sabre
      Value Fund LP
    4,578,700(8)
    8.9%Common Stock
    Proximity Capital LLC
    3,165,000(9)
    6.2%


|(1) | Under Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or
      indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding,
      relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes
      the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment
      power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of
      shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than
      one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power
      to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be
      beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the
      shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the
      date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage
      ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to
      include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only
      such person) by reason of
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

27





---

|    | these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of
      outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not
      necessarily reflect the persons actual ownership or voting power with
      respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on
      November 18, 2008. As of November 18, 2008, there were 51,223,647 shares
      of our common stock issued and outstanding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | Consists of 407,500 shares held by Mr. Vandenberg and
      300,000 shares that are immediately acquirable upon the exercise of stock
      options held by Mr. Vandenberg within 60 days of November 18, 2008 and
      37,500 shares that are immediately acquirable upon the exercise of
      warrants held by Mr. Vandenberg within 60 days of November 18,
  2008.                                                   
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(3) | Consists of 161,300 shares held by Mr. Kolic and 300,000
      shares that are immediately acquirable upon the exercise of stock options
      held by Mr. Kolic within within 60 days of November 18, 2008.                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(4) | Consists of 300,000 shares that are immediately
      acquirable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Langs within 60
      days of November 18, 2008.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(5) | Consists of 100,000 shares held by Mr. Kumagai and
      300,000 shares that are immediately acquirable upon the exercise of stock
      options held by Mr. Kumagai within 60 days of November 18, 2008.                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(6) | Consists of 205,000 shares held by Mr. Koshman and
      150,000 shares that are immediately acquirable upon the exercise of stock
      options held by Mr. Koshman within 60 days of November 18, 2008.                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(7) | Consists of 10,756,355 shares held by Mr. Vestergaard and
      300,000 shares that are immediately acquirable upon the exercise of stock
      options held by Mr. Vestergaard within 60 days of November 18,
  2008.                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(8) | Consists of 3,578,700 shares and 1,500,000 shares that
      are immediately acquirable upon the exercise of warrants within 60 days of
      November 18, 2008.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(9) | Consists of 1,665,000 shares and 1,500,000 shares that
      are immediately acquirable upon the exercise of warrants within 60 days of
      November 18, 2008.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

28





---

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

We have two equity compensation plans, namely our Amended 1999
Stock Option Plan and our Amended 2006 Stock Option Plan, under which up to
3,750,000 and 5,100,000 shares of our common stock, respectively, have been
authorized for issuance to our officers, directors, employees and consultants.
Our plans have been approved by the Companys stockholders. The following
summary information is presented for our plans on an aggregate basis as of
August 31, 2008.

Number of Securities to be
      Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and
      Rights
    Weighted-Average Exercise
      Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
    Number of Securities Remaining Available
      for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding
      Securities Reflected in column (a))Plan Category
    (a)
    (b)
    (c)Equity Compensation Plans Approved By Security
      Holders
    4,339,000 Shares of Common Stock
    $0.48 per Share
    916,334 Shares of Common StockEquity Compensation Plans Not Approved By Security
      Holders
    Not Applicable
    Not Applicable
    Not Applicable


|ITEM 12. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
      TRANSACTIONS.
|-------- | -----------------------------------------------------

Except as described under Item 11 and under the title of
executive compensation, and under note 5 of the financial statements, none of
the following persons has any direct or indirect material interest in any
transaction to which we were or are a party during the past two years, or in any
proposed transaction to which the Company proposes to be a party:

|(A) | any director or officer;                                                                                                                                                                              
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(B) | any proposed nominee for election as a
director;                                                                                                                                                      
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(C) | any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly,
      shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to our common
      stock; or                                              
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(D) | any relative or spouse of any of the foregoing persons,
      or any relative of such spouse, who has the same house as such person or
      who is a director or officer of any parent or
subsidiary.

29





---

SHARE ISSUANCES

None

|ITEM 13. | EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
|-------- | ---------------------------------

|(a) | Exhibits
|--- | --------

|EXHIBIT NUMBER | DESCRIPTION                                                                                                                                                     
|-------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |                                                                                                                                                                 
|31.1           | Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002(1)                                               
|               |                                                                                                                                                                 
|31.2           | Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002(1)                                               
|               |                                                                                                                                                                 
|32.1           | Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)
|               |                                                                                                                                                                 
|32.2           | Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)
|               |                                                                                                                                                                 
|23.1           | Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm(1)                                                                                               

| | (1) | Filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on
      Form 10-KSB
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | Reports on Form 8-K.
|--- | --------------------

During the year ended August 31, 2008, we filed the following
reports on Form 8-K.

On December 21, 2007 we announced Destiny Media Technologies
had agreed to terms with a second of four major record labels for the digital
distribution of content through the Play MPE system in Canada, the United
States and Mexico. The agreement would be effective November 1, 2007. Further
details on this agreement were announced on February 1, 2008.

On February 1, 2008 we announced an agreement with EMI Music
North America to distribute their music digitally through the internet to radio
stations and other trusted recipients in Canada, the United States and Mexico
using the company's secure Play MPE digital distribution system
(http://www.plaympe.com). The contract is effective November 1, 2007 and is for
a one year term.

On February 19, 2008 we announced Destiny Media Technologies
has received an opinion regarding whether existing common shares constitute a
qualified investment for a trust governed by a registered retirement savings
plan (a RRSP) for Canadian Income Tax purposes.

On June 6, 2008 we announced Destiny Media Technologies has
extended and expanded a commercial agreement with Universal Music Group to
distribute their music digitally through the internet to radio stations and
other trusted recipients in Canada, the United States and Mexico using the
Company's secure Play MPE digital distribution system (http://www.plaympe.com).
The multi-year agreement is effective from March 31, 2008 through March 31, 2010
and expands and extends the previous agreement between the two companies.

30

---

|ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|-------- | --------------------------------------

Audit FeesOur independent registered public
accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, provided audit and other services during
the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007 as follows:

2008
    
    
    2007Audit Fees
    $
    76,500
    
    $
    81,500Audit Related Fees
    
    -
    
    
    -Tax Fees
    
    -
    
    
    -All Other Fees
    
    
    
    
    -Total Fees
    $
    76,500
    
    $
    81,500


Audit Fees. This category
includes the fees for the audit of our consolidated financial statements and the
quarterly reviews of interim financial statements. This category also includes
advice on audit and accounting matters that arose during or as a result of the
audit or the review of interim financial statements and services in connection
with SEC filings.

Audit Related Fees. There were
no audited related fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP.

Tax Fees. This category includes
the fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and
tax planning. There were no tax fees paid to Ernst &Young LLP.

All Other Fees. There were no
other fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP.

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission
adopted rules that require that before Ernst & Young LLP is engaged by the
Company or its subsidiaries to render any auditing or permitted non-audit
related service, the engagement be:

- approved by the Company's audit
committee; or - entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and
procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and
procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the audit committee is
informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include
delegation of the audit committee's responsibilities to management.

The audit committee requires advance approval of all audit,
audit-related, tax, and other services performed by the independent auditor.
Unless the specific service has been previously pre-approved with respect to
that year, the audit committee must approve the permitted service before the
independent auditor is engaged to perform it. The audit committee has delegated
to the chair of the audit committee authority to approve permitted services
provided that the chair reports any decisions to the committee at its next
scheduled meeting.

The audit committee has considered the nature and amount of the
fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP, and believes that the provision of the
services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining
Ernst & Young LLP's independence.

31

---

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the
Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.

DESTINY MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

|By: | /s/ Steven Vestergaard                        | 
|--- | --------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Steven Vestergaard, President                 | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer                       | 
|    | Director                                      | 
|    | Date: January 7, 2009                         | 
|    |                                               | 
|    |                                               | 
|    | /s/ Frederick Vandenberg                      | 
|    | Frederick Vandenberg, Chief Financial Officer | 
|    | Date: January 7, 2009                         | 

In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act, this report has
been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in
the capacities and on the dates indicated.

|By: | /s/ Steven Vestergaard                                               | 
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Steven Vestergaard, President                                        | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer                                              | 
|    | (Principal Executive Officer)                                        | 
|    | Director                                                             | 
|    | Date: January 7, 2009                                                | 
|    |                                                                      | 
|By: | /s/ Frederick Vandenberg                                             | 
|    | Frederick Vandenberg, Chief Financial Officer                        | 
|    | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer) | 
|    | Date: January 7, 2009                                                | 
|    |                                                                      | 
|    |                                                                      | 
|By: | /s/ Edward Kolic                                                     | 
|    | Edward Kolic                                                         | 
|    | Director                                                             | 
|    | Date: January 7, 2009                                                | 
|    |                                                                      | 
|    |                                                                      | 
|    |                                                                      | 
|By: | /s/ Wayne Koshman                                                    | 
|    | Wayne Koshman                                                        | 
|    | Director                                                             | 
|    | Date: January 7, 2009                                                | 

32





---