alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.4

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UCDP FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 1, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tracey L.
Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 10, 2007



By:

/s/ TRACEY L. STOCKWELLTracey L. StockwellTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 34.3





KPMG LLP


303 East Wacker Drive


Chicago, IL 60601-5212





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Citibank, N.A.:




We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix I, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 is fairly stated, in all material respects.







/s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois


February 28, 2011
- Extracted 1/11/16
Exhibit 32(a)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of MSW Energy Holdings LLC. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, John T. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael J.
Gruppuso, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


    /s/ John T. Miller                    /s/ Michael J. Gruppuso
    -----------------------               -----------------------
    John T. Miller                        Michael J. Gruppuso
    Chief Executive Officer               Chief Financial Officer
    Date:  November 12, 2004              Date:  November 12, 2004
Before the Second Division,

February 4, 1943

No. 47988.

#### Protests 615261-G, etc., of A. Rosen & Sons, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the items in question are similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Some of the harvest hats were therefore held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those entered or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to the date of the said trade agreement were held dutiable at *12Yz*percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) as claimed.
Exhibit 4.3


                              Consulting Agreement


Entered  into  this  28th  day  of March, 2001 by the parties to this agreement,
Call-Solutions,  Inc.  ("CALL")  and  Hank  Caldwell,  ("Consultant").

Whereas by and for the consideration of 1,000,000 of the common equity shares of
Call,  Consultant  hereby  agrees  to  provide  the  services  of  entertainment
infrastructure  development  and  other  consulting services associated with the
entertainment  industry  for  a  period of 2 years from the date of signing this
agreement.



/s/  Hank  Caldwell
----------------------------
     Hank  Caldwell



/s/  Call-Solutions,  Inc.
----------------------------
     Call-Solutions,  Inc.


                                       27
<PAGE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 29, 2017

No. 04-17-00018-CV

DDR DB STONE OAK, LP 

Appellant (Cross-Appellee),

v.

RECTOR PARTY CO., LLC; Don Lasseter; and Joslyn Boberg 

Appellees (Cross-Appellants),

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-01261

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The parties’ joint motion for extension of time to file motions for rehearing is 

GRANTED. Any motions for rehearing are due on January 4, 2018. 

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment Number 13 to
the Guardian Separate Account D registration statement on Form N-4 (the
"Registration Statement") of our report dated February 20, 2001, relating to the
financial statements of The Guardian Separate Account D, and our report dated
February 15, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements of The
Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc., which appear in such Registration
Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts -
Financial Statements" and "Appendix A - Summary Financial Information" in such
Registration Statement.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


New York, New York
April 27, 2001
Exhibit 32.1

         Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Otto Fletcher, and CEO of Silver Screen Studios, Inc., a
Georgia corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by
Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following
of this quarterly report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934:

Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005.

The undersigned certifies that the above periodic report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of Silver Screen Studios, Inc. and results of
its operations.

By:/s/ Otto Fletcher
   -----------------
Otto Fletcher  acting CEO and a acting Director

May 12, 2005
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 15, 2017

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-2899

Lower Tribunal No. 12-46272

________________



### Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority

,

Petitioner,

vs.



### Electronic Transaction Consultants Corporation

,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction

– Prohibition.

Holland & Knight LLP, and Rodolfo Sorondo, Jr. and Christopher N.

Bellows

, for petitioner.

Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli, P.A.

, and Michael Piscitelli and Bradley S.

Copenhaver (Ft. Lauderdale), for respondent.

Before SUAREZ, C.J., and ROTHENBERG and SALTER, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, J.Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority (“MDX”) seeks a writ of

prohibition disqualifying the trial judge and an order remanding the case to the

circuit court for the reassignment of the case to another judge. Because we

conclude that the motion to disqualify the trial judge filed below was both timely

and legally sufficient, disqualification is required. See Wolfson v. Wolfson

, 159

So. 3d 394, 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (finding that disqualification is required

where the trial judge’s comments suggested that she had prejudged the case);

Wade v. Wade

, 123 So. 3d 697, 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (holding that

disqualification is required where the trial court announced its ruling before

hearing all of the evidence); Cummings v. Montalvo

, 135 So. 3d 389, 389 (Fla. 5th

DCA 2014) (finding that disqualification was required because the judge’s

statements reflected that she had prejudged a party’s credibility); Amato v. Winn

Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James

, 810 So. 2d 979, 980-83 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)

(finding that disqualification was required where the trial court had issued an order

on the merits before all of the evidence had been submitted, even though the trial

court subsequently vacated the order). We, therefore, grant the petition and

remand for reassignment of the case to another judge.

Petition granted.

2
#### The People, App’lts, v. Jas. A. Flack, Sh’ff, etc., Resp’t.

Appeal from order of Hon. H. W. Bookstaver, J.

Motion to dismiss appeal.

Per Curiam.

The affidavit of relator’s attorney in opposition to the motion to dismiss excuses the failure to serve printed papers, on the ground of negotiations for a settlement still pending. But the notice to dismiss was served *1001on the third instant, and the relator should have printed his papers, or come prepared to say when they can he ready for the argument. He does not do this, but merely says that he “does not wish to undergo the expense of the appeal, if the matters in difference can he settled amicably.”

This wholly indefinite statement cannot he received as an answer to this motion.

Whatever negotiations for settlement were pending, the service of notice to dismiss ended them so far as this appeal is concerned. Without a written Stipulation, we cannot hold that the respondent is estopped from enforcing his rights under the rules.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Alan Ziegler, Nicolas Bene, Lissette :

Chevalier, Jose Munoz, and Efrain : Caban, Individually and on Behalf of : all Similarly Situated Persons :

:

v. : No. 1777 C.D. 2019

: The City of Reading and Reading : Area Water Authority :

: Appeal of: City of Reading :

AMENDING ORDER

AND NOW, this 1 st day of March , 20 21

, the Opinion in the above

matter, filed January 8, 2021, is AMENDED to correct the mis statements that the

Court of Common Pleas of Berks County (trial court) held additional evidentiary

hearings on remand. The corrections , which appear on pages 5, 9, 10 a nd 11

, clarify

that the trial court decided the matter based on the evidentiary record previously

established.

In all other respects, the Court’s Opinion and Order remains intact, and

a corrected copy is attached.

__________________________________ MICHAEL H. WOJCIK, Judge
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.52

                 TENTH AMENDMENT TO LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT

            This Amendment dated as of August 17, 2000, is between Bank of
America, N.A., formerly known as Bank of America National Trust and Savings
Association (the "Bank") and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (the "Borrower").

                                    RECITALS
                                    --------

            A. The Bank and the Borrower entered into a certain Letter of
Credit Agreement dated as of June 1, 1997 (as previously amended, the "L/C
Agreement").

            B. The Bank and the Borrower are currently parties to a Syndicated
Credit Agreement dated as of June 1, 1997 among the Borrower, the several
financial institutions from time to time party thereto, and Bank of America
National Trust and Savings Association, as agent, as amended through the Sixth
Amendment thereto (the "Old Syndicate Agreement"). The Bank and the Borrower
have, or are about to, enter into a new syndicated credit agreement with the
Bank as agent for the lenders party thereto (the "New Syndicate Agreement"), at
which time the Old Syndicate Agreement will be terminated.

            C. The Bank and the Borrower desire to amend the L/C Agreement.

                                   AGREEMENT
                                   ---------

            1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this
Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the L/C Agreement.

            2. Amendment. The L/C Agreement is amended as follows:

                  2.1 The term "Syndicated Credit Agreement" is amended to mean
      the Old Syndicate Agreement, notwithstanding any termination of the Old
      Syndicate Agreement.

                  2.2 Upon the effectiveness of the New Syndicate Agreement,
      all cash advances under the L/C Agreement must be repaid in full, and no
      further cash advances will be available under the L/C Agreement.

            3. Representations and Warranties. When the Borrower signs this
Amendment, the Borrower represents and warrants to the Bank that the
representations and warranties in Article 5 of the L/C Agreement, as applied to
the L/C Agreement as amended hereby, are true and correct as of the date of
this Amendment as if made on the date of this Amendment, except to the extent
they expressly refer to a specific date.

            4. Effect of Amendment. Except as provided in this Amendment, all
of the terms and conditions of the L/C Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.


                                     - 1 -
<PAGE>   2


            This Amendment is executed as of the date first stated above.


BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.                     WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.


By /s/ MICHAEL SANZ                       By /s/ SHARON L. McCOLLAM
  ----------------------------              ----------------------------
Typed Name Michael Sanz                     Sharon L. McCollam
          --------------------              Vice President Finance
Title Vice President
     -------------------------



                                     - 2 -
#### Buchanan *v.*State.

In Banc.

Nov. 8, 1948.

(37 So. (2d) 318)

Roy J. Goss, for appellant.

*307George H. Ethridge, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*308Griffith, C. J.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of assault and battery with intent to kill. There were only two eyewitnesses to the alleged offense, the prosecuting witness and the accused, and there is but little if any substantial evidence of a corroboratory character. As is usual in such cases, the versions given by the two participants in the difficulty differed, but that given by the accused seems to us the more reasonable, and if accepted the accused could not be convicted of a higher offense than assault and battery and perhaps not even of that.

This brings into review the following feature of the record:

*309In the examination of the witnesses, the prosecuting attorney repeatedly propounded questions so framed as to impress the jury that the accused was a man of a violent and quarrelsome disposition and that he had committed serious assaults upon other persons on different occasions in the past, — and this whether the questions were answered or not.  These interrogations were obviously improper under elementary rules of criminal evidence, and the court repeatedly sustained the objections to them, but the attorney persisted along the same lines until finally the defendant moved for a mistrial, which in view of what had happened the court should have sustained.

What we said in Coleman v. State, 198 Miss. 519, 23 So. (2d) 404, is sufficiently in point, and we make the same order here as was made in that case.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.01

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
White Oak Financial Services, Inc. as general partner of Providence Select
Fund, L.P., certify that (i) the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008
of Providence Select Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Providence Select Fund, L.P.


PROVIDENCE SELECT FUND, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By:	White Oak Financial Services, Inc., General Partner



By: /s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer

Date:	August 14, 2008


<page>
Exhibit
32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Brighton Investment Holding Co., Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Michael Curtis, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
    the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15() of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 /s/
      Michael CurtisMichael
      Curtis, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
OfficerMay
      18, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32(b)



                             TXU ENERGY COMPANY LLC
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                              CERTIFICATION OF CFO


      The undersigned, Kirk R. Oliver, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of TXU Energy Company LLC (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
that:

  1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
      2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  2.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 12th day of August, 2004.




                                         /s/ Kirk R. Oliver
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     Name:   Kirk R. Oliver
                                     Title:  Executive Vice President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TXU Energy Company LLC and will be retained by TXU Energy Company
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 54772.

#### Gaston Ditesheim et al. *v.*United States,

protests 158761-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS




We hereby consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the "Annual Report") of Equal Energy Ltd. (the "Registrant"). We hereby further consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of the Registrant's Annual Information Form dated March 20, 2012 for the year ended December 31, 2011, which document makes reference to our firm and our report dated February 15, 2012, evaluating the Registrant's oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids interests effective December 31, 2011.





Sincerely,




McDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.







Signed "B. Wurster"





B. J. Wurster, P. Eng.


Vice President


Calgary Alberta Canada


March 20, 2011
EXHIBIT 13.1

    CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss.1350,
        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ss.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 of Metalink Ltd. (the "Company") as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Tzvika Shukhman, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, certify that:

      1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 29, 2010

                                                By: /s/ Tzvika Shukhman
                                                -----------------------
                                                Name:  Tzvika Shukhman
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer