alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth S. Klipper, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Dated:
November 10, 2008

/s/ KENNETH S. KLIPPER Kenneth S. Klipper Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer


---



QuickLinks
June 18, 1941

No. 46248.

Suit 4317.

#### Dover *Shipping Co.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 306. Appeal dismissed April 16, 1941; not yet reported.
#### Edward B. Van Dusen, *Respondent, v.*Nathaniel N. Smith, *Appellant.*

— Order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AP52

Higgins, Cortney

to: RobertJ Wayland

03/04/2011 06:47 PM

Cc: Thomas Gillis, Karen Thundiyil, Bill Maxwell, Tom Walton

4 Attachments

Summary of Interagency Working Comments on draft EGU MACT under EO 12866 Interagency

Review_ 03 04 2011.doc

Nash Expert Report.pdf

ref2011_d120810c_2007_dollars.xls

US_Coal_Distribution_Electric _Power_Sector_AIW_2007_2009.xls

Hi Bob,

Attached you will find interagency comments on RIN 2060

‐ AP52. The comments reference the three

other documents attached. Additionally, the comments on Chapter 9 of the RIA, as well as some of the

TSDs, are forthcoming (likely ready by Monday).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Cortney

________________________________________________ Cortney Higgins

Policy Analyst

OMB/OIRA/NRE

202.395.7856

chiggins@omb.eop.govHi Bob,

Attached you will find interagency comments on RIN 2060-AP52. The

comments reference the three other documents attached. Additionally, the

comments on Chapter 9 of the RIA, as well as some of the TSDs, are

forthcoming (likely ready by Monday).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Cortney

________________________________________________ Cortney Higgins

Policy Analyst

OMB/OIRA/NRE

202.395.7856

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-171287 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 20, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements of HiSoft Technology International Limited, its subsidiaries and its variable interest entity (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, and the financial statement schedule of HiSoft Technology International Limited, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of HiSoft Technology International Limited dated April 20, 2012.

 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.

Beijing, the People’s Republic of China

April 20, 2012

 

----
No. 42994.

#### Protest 501-K of La Favorite Rubber Mfg. Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the record presented the blanket was found to be American goods returned, entitled to free entry under paragraph 1615, Tariff Act of 1930.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-590]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AZ-240-06-1770-PC-211A]


Notice of Re-Opening for a Notice of Call for Nominations for the 
Sonoran Desert National Monument Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Re-Opening of Call for Nomination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice was previously published in the Federal Register 
Vol. 71, No. 242, Monday, December 18, 2006. Additional nominations are 
being requested for positions on the Sonoran Desert National Monument 
Advisory Council (SDNMAC). There are fifteen positions on the SDNMAC. A 
primary and alternate person will be selected for each position. This 
Federal Register notice will extend the call for nominations for 
positions on the Advisory Council and requests the public to submit 
nominations for membership on the SDNMAC. Any individual or 
organization may nominate one or more persons to serve on the SDNMAC. 
Individuals may nominate themselves for SDNMAC membership. All nominees 
that previously submitted complete nomination packages will be 
considered for SDNMAC positions and do not need to resubmit their 
information.

DATES: Submit nomination packets for positions to the address listed 
below no later than 21 days after date of publication of this notice in 
the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Send completed nomination packets to: SDNM Advisory Council, 
c/o Karen Kelleher, Monument Manager, BLM, Phoenix District, 21605 
North 7th Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85027; Fax 623-580-5580; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#76372c292532383b373536141a1b58111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5a4bfbab6a1aba8a4a6a5878988cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Kelleher, Monument Manager, 
Phone 623-580-5500 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5213080d01161c1f131112303e3f7c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c98893969a8d8784888a89aba5a4e7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a>. Nomination packets are 
also available for download at the BLM Internet site: http://www.blm.gov/az/sonoran/council.htm.

     Dated: January 5, 2007.
Karen Kelleher,
Sonoran Desert National Monument Manager, Phoenix District of the 
Bureau of Land Management.
[FR Doc. E7-590 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Project No. 10228-038] 

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) regulations contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (18 CFR part 380 [FERC Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897]), the Office of Energy Projects staff (staff) reviewed a proposal to amend the design authorized by the license for the Cannelton Hydroelectric Project, to be located at the U.S. Corps of Engineers' Cannelton Locks and Dam on the Ohio River in Hancock County, Kentucky, and prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the proposed amendment of the project license. In this EA, staff analyzes the potential environmental effects of replacing the authorized 140 small generator units with three conventional turbine and generator units and concludes that the amendment would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. 

                    A copy of the EA is attached to a Commission order titled “Order Amending License,” issued March 22, 2007 and is available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov.*                     For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-5997 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
No. 64977.

#### Close & Stewart *v.*United States,

protests 312699-K and 294227-K (Seattle).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
June 26, 2015 

Mr. David Mason 

Nobles Consulting Group 

2844 Pablo Avenue 

Tallahassee, FL 32309 

Dear Mr. Mason: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 21 and §§ 45.23, 45.29, 61.23, 61.3, 61.113(a) and (b), 61.133(a), 91.7(a), 91.9, 

91.109(a), 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 

91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we 

cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your April 27, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Nobles Consulting Group 

into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1510), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
STATE OFMICHIGAN • ::;T'-''-WT ('^p 

RICK SNYDER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ^i^^irprS M KIRKT STEUDLE 

GOVERNOR , .,„.,„ ;.i' 'i ..'n !/\l iU;'; DIRECTOR 

LANSING ' _",,.— --. \ T i r'\ 

February 21, 2012 P 3^ ?5 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

To Whom It May Concern: 

Sun Country Slot Exemption - Docket Number FAA-2012-0089 

Sun Country Airlines has requested an exemption from the slot limit for Ronald Reagan 

Washington National Airport (DCA) set forth in § 93.123(a), to permit the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to create air carrier slots during certain limited hours for Sun Country's 

use. The proposed air carrier slots would replace two slot exemptions under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Order 2010-12-16 awarded to Sun Country. On January 6, 2012, the 

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the DOT Order, and 

Sun Country will lose its existing service between DCA and Lansing's Capital Region 

International Airport. Specifically, Sun Country desires to retain one daily slot pair during the 

1000 to 1100 hour time frame. The proposed exemption would permit Sun Country to continue 

operating its existing services and avoid an inequitable result of the Court's order. 

Sun Country DCA service is essential to the economic growth of the Greater Lansing Region. 

The daily service is the only large aircraft (737-800) service to DCA in Michigan, outside of 

Detroit. Prior to Sun Country, the regional community had requested the introduction of this 

service from numerous other airline operators, without success. Accordingly, it is critical that 

FAA take the necessary steps to ensure the continuation of the Sun Country slots at the 

established flight times in support of Greater Lansing's business and economic growth. 

If you have any questions, please contact either me or Mike Trout, Executive Administrator for 

the Office of Aeronautics, at 517-335-9578. 

Sincerely, 

yU^^^^ 

Kirk T. Steudle 

Director 

cc: Robert Selig, Capital Region Airport Authority 

MURRAY D. VAN WAGONER BUILDING • P.O. BOX 30050 • LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909 

www.michigan.gov • (517) 373-2090 

LH-LAN-0 (01/11)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John A. Scarlett, M.D., certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tercica, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tercica, Inc.

Date: August 5, 2008



By:

/s/ John A. Scarlett, M.D.John A. Scarlett, M.D.Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Tercica, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form
10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### Christian T. Christensen, *Plaintiff, v.*Paul W. Spofford, *Defendant.*

— Order affirmed, without costs. Opinions by Daniels and Macomber, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8717 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

20 West Main Street in Santaquin, Utah, as the ‘‘SGT Bill Hooser 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2024 

Mr. OWENS (for himself, Mr. CURTIS, Ms. MALOY, and Mr. MOORE of Utah) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 20 West Main Street in Santaquin, Utah, 

as the ‘‘SGT Bill Hooser Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SGT BILL HOOSER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 20 West Main Street in 

6 Santaquin, Utah, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘SGT Bill Hooser Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8717 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘SGT Bill Hooser Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 41885.

#### Protest 127645-G of American Express Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of laces similar to those involved in *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
## CITY OFPELICAN P.O. Box 737 ·Pelican, Alaska 99832 ·(907) 735-2202 ·Fax(907) 735-2258 l f) 

### -I

### b - 2.0 )

# Lf j)(;.7 - 

## cs7-

**~co** 2- 

### I/>'

### g6
Order 2011-3-11, issued 3-9-2011, selected Alaska Seaplane Service, LLC. (Alaska Seaplanes) to provide EAS for an annual subsidy of$185,721 at Pelican from June 

### 1, 2011 through January 31, 2015. On 9-22-2014, Order 2014-9-13 issued a "Request for Proposals" to provide "service at Elfin 

### Cove, Pelican, Angoon, and Tenakee, with orwithout subsidy, for a new contract beginning February 1, 2015." The order further states that, "The community and air carriers are encouraged to work together in advance ofthe due date for proposals to craft a service pattern that is desirable to the community and meetsthe operational needs ofthe airlines." Order 2014-9-13 includes the followingfootnote:

" 1 Harris Aircraft Services (Harris Air) currently provides non-EAS air service from Angoon, Pelican, and Tenakee to Sitka (SIT) than meets frequency minimums for EAS. Harris Air also has an application with the Departmentfor a certificate of public convenience and necessity. If Harris Air's application is approved, we may revisit the need for requesting proposals atthose three locations. The purpose ofthe EAS program is to ensure that communities have airservice access where there would nototherwise be access. IfHarris Air, as a certificated carrier, is providing subsidy-free EAS, the need for subsidized EAS is moot." In a letterdated 9-26-2014, City ofAngoon Mayor Matthew Kookesh states: This statement is alarming because itthreatens Angoon's longstanding and important essential air service between our community and Juneau-Angoon's most importantdestination-in favor of less frequent service to an inferior destination. At present, the City of Pelican has tailored EAS service provided by Alaska Seaplanes from Juneau to Pelican. Juneau is our hub communitywith a greater percentage oftransportation transitingthrough Juneau. And for eight months oftheyearflight service from Juneau to Pelican exists primarily because ofthe EAS program. I did write a letter in supportof Harris Air Service application for an Air Carrier Certificate, which will allow for an improved schedule and the transport ofmail forthe U.S. Postal Service. However, I saw this as an opportunityto provided expanded airservice between Sitka and Pelican for additional passenger traffic meantto augment air travel in and out of Pelican not reduce the important level of EAS airservice that routinely occurs with Alaska Seaplanes between Juneau and Pelican. The EAS program and the City of Pelican, Alaska's existing air service is crucial tovital to our community. Withoutwhich ouroptionsfor sustainable development are severely limited.Thank you foryourtime. Sincerely, , .



# ?~r~

Patricia Phillips Mayor Cc: US Senator Lisa Murkowski US Senator Mark Begich US Rep. Don Young
No. 38951.

#### Protests 930257-G, etc., of Rodak, Inc. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel jars, bottles, soap dishes, tooth brush holders and tubes, powder boxes, and soap boxes chiefly used in the kitchen or household or on the table for utilitarian purposes, or hollow ware, were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. *Dow*v. *United States*(21 C. C. P. A. 282, T. D. 46816) cited.
No. 56053.

protests 169527-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Fisher Silversmiths, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 35.3





Servicer Compliance Statement





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Sallie Mae, Inc., the Administrator and Servicer for Citibank N.A. Student Loan Corporation Trusts1 (the “Trusts”), does hereby certify that:





(a)           This certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB.





(b)           A review of the servicing activities of the Servicer and the Administrator as of December 31, 2011 and for the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 20112 (the “Reporting Period”) and their performance under the applicable servicing and administration agreements for each of the Trusts has been made under my supervision; and





(c)           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of their obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the Trusts in all material respects through the Reporting Period.








/s/ Joseph DePaulo


Joseph DePaulo


Executive Vice President, Banking and Finance


Sallie Mae, Inc.


April 19, 2013



















1  SLC Student Loan Trust 2004-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-1,  SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-2,  SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-3,  SLC Student Loan Trust 2006-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2006-2,  SLC Student Loan Trust 2007-1,  SLC Student Loan Trust 2007-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2008-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2008-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2009-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2009-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2009-3, and SLC Student Loan Trust 2010-1 (collectively, the “Citibank Trusts”).


2  Effective May 1, 2011, Sallie Mae, Inc. assumed responsibility for the following servicing criteria: 1122 (d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(v).  Effective October 8, 2011, Sallie Mae, Inc. assumed responsibility for the remaining applicable servicing criteria for the Citibank Trusts.
#### Commonwealth *v.*Goodwyn, Appellant.

Submitted April 21,1969.

May 28, 1969 :

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*Joshua Goodwyn,*appellant, in propria persona.

*Howard T. Gathright,*Assistant District Attorney, and *Ward F. Clark,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed.

Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.