alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Maxwell Meyers, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated: May 14, 2004/s/DANIEL MAXWELL MEYERSDaniel Maxwell Meyers
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board of Directors


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The First Marblehead Corporation and will be retained by The First Marblehead Corporation
and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Equal Energy Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don Klapko, President and Chief Executive Officer of Equal Energy Ltd., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Don
Klapko                                                    
|Don Klapko
President and Chief Executive Officer
of Equal Energy Ltd.

April 29, 2014
### SERVED: February 19, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
INTHE MATTEROF

GENE HARRISON FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2014.-0860
ORDER ON AGENCY'S MOTION TO DISMISS RESPONDENT'S UNTIMELY APPEAL OR IN THEALTERNATIVE TO ACCEPT COMPLAINT TheFederal Aviation Admi.nistration (hereinafter "FAA"or "Complainant") filed a Motion to Dismiss Respondent's Untimely Appeal or in the Alternative to Accept Complaint. The FAAalleges it issued a Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty to Gene Harrison (herein after "Respondent") on March 26, 2013. On September 18, 2014, the FAA issued an Amended Final Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty. Respondent received the Amended Final Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty on September22, 2014. On November20, 2014, Respondent left a voicemail message for the undersigned FAA counsel inquiring as to whetherthe FAA had received his appeal. On November 24, 2014, FAAcounsel attempted to contact Respondent to no avail. On November 24, 2014, FAAcounsel contacted the Hearing Docket and was advised that it received an appeal from Respondent on October 21, 2014. Respondent filed a Request for Hearing dated September30, 2014. Respondent provides no explanation for his untimelyfiling. In the interest offundamental Due Process, we willdeny the FAA's Motion to Dismiss and grant its prayer for alternative relief. WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

### 1. The FAA'sMotion to Dismiss Respondent's Untimely Appeal·be and is hereby DENIED; and2. The FAA's Motionto Accept Complaint be and is hereby GRANTED. 3. TheFAA should file its Complaint within thirty (30) days ofthis Order.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service List



### 2SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### Gene Harrison, Respondent 3705 Arctic Blvd. Apt. 543 Anchorage, AK 99503 TEL: 907-727-4719 Jeanine Gotimer, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration ONE COPY



### Office ofRegional Counsel, Eastern Region 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3272 FAX: 718-995-5699 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.K (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2014-0860 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building--Suite 2WI000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 3
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT

Wasatch Pharmaceutical, Inc., a Utah Corporation, hereby confirms that Wasatch
has offered this Employment Contract to GARY V. HEESCH and that GARY V. HEESCH
has accepted this Employment Contract under the following terms and conditions:

1. For a five year period beginning September 1, 2000 and ending August 31,
2005, Gary Heesch will be an officer of Wasatch Pharmaceutical, Inc.and with all
appropriate duties and responsibilities associated with that office as defined
by the Board of Directors. Additional duties may be assigned by the Board of
Directors of Wasatch Pharmaceutical, Inc.

2. Gary Heesch will receive a base salary of $150,000 per year, with a 10%
annual increase. Additional salary increases will be based on performance
criteria to be determined by the Board of Directors. Anytime during the period
of this contract, if it is determined by the Board of Directors that this salary
puts Wasatch in jeopardy, such salary will be reduced, with the difference to
accrue and be paid at such time Wasatch is profitable. Acquisition, expansion,
research and other such endeavors shall not be justification to withhold the
salary in question or the accrued difference.

3. This Employment Contract is binding upon the company for the above term and
cannot be altered or changed by the Board unless there is evidence of
significant malfeasance in office or evidence of intentional criminal
wrongdoing. If any changes are made by new officers or directors in opposition
to this agreement, Gary Heesch has the right to accelerate this agreement and
have all conditions for the full remainder of the agreement due and payable on
demand.

4. A full compensation package is being developed by the Compensation Committee
of the Board which will include this base salary plus loans, stock, stock
options, health insurance, retirement, bonuses, and pay increases, and will be
finalized by December 31, 2000. Gary Heesch shall receive the same consideration
as all other officers in the compensation package that shall be put in place by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.


Dated and signed this 1st day of September, 2000.

WASATCH PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.

/s/ Gary V. Heesch                                /s/ David K. Giles
------------------------------------              ------------------------------
Gary V. Heesch                                    David K. Giles, Vice President


Passed by a resolution of the Board of Directors on September 18, 2000.

/s/ David K. Giles                               /s/ Robert Arbon
---------------------------------------          -------------------------------
Corporate Secretary                              Robert Arbon
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0455 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RONALD JOSEPH VALLIE JR., ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until December 21 , 2020 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court November 17 2020

11/17/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0455
#### Herbert B. Moller *v.*United States

No. 7339.

Pro forma invoice dated Lamporecchio, Italy, August 19, 1946.

Certified August 19, 1946.

Entered at Jacksonville, Fla., October 16, 1946.

Entry No. J-40.

*220(Decided July 16, 1947)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Arthur R. Martoccia,*special.attorney), for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement of bleached Ruscus imported from Italy on September 3, 1946. The merchandise was entered on the basis of a pro forma invoice and was appraised as entered. It is claimed by the importer that when the goods arrived, the larger portion was found to consist of a lower grade material.

The merchandise was appraised on October 18, 1946 and the appeal to reappraisement was filed on November 22, 1946. At the trial counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was filed more than 30 days after appraisement. It has been held that where the merchandise is appraised as entered and no notice of appraisement is sent to the importer, he may nevertheless file an appeal within 30 days after appraisement. *Rolls Razor, Inc.*v. *United States,*4 Cust. Ct. 647, Reap. Dec. 4735; *Harry Glassberg*v. *United States,*5 Cust. Ct. 599, Reap. Dec. 5048. However, an appeal filed more than 30 days after appraisement was dismissed in *Geo. S. Bush*& *Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*1 Cust. Ct. 821, Reap. Dec. 4479.

Since the appeal herein was filed more than 30 days after appraisement, it must be dismissed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as


Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:


(i)the accompanying amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: April 1, 2016





/s/ A. William SteinA. William SteinChief Executive Officer








Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 10.7

BANK OF AMERICA
================================================================================
                                                          AMENDMENT TO DOCUMENTS

                   AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT

        This Amendment No. 2 (the "Amendment") dated as of
_______________________, ____, is between Bank of America, N.A. (the "Bank"),
formerly Bank of America NT & SA, and Calavo Growers of California (the
"Borrower").

                                    RECITALS

        A.      The Bank and the Borrower entered into a certain Business Loan
Agreement dated as of April 20, 1999, as previously amended (the "Agreement").

        B.      The Bank and the Borrower desire to further amend the Agreement.

                                    AGREEMENT

        1.      DEFINITIONS. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this
Amendment shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement.

        2.      AMENDMENTS. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

                2.1     In Paragraph 7.6(e) of the Agreement, the amount "TWENTY
                        SIX MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($26,500,000)"
                        is substituted for the amount "TWENTY THREE MILLION FIVE
                        HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($23,500,000)."

        3.      REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. When the Borrower signs this
Amendment, the Borrower represents and warrants to the Bank that: (a) there is
no event which is, or with notice or lapse of time or both would be, a default
under the Agreement except those events, if any, that have been disclosed in
writing to the Bank or waived in writing by the Bank, (b) the representations
and warranties in the Agreement are true as of the date of this Amendment as if
made on the date of this Amendment, (c) this Amendment is within the Borrower's
powers, has been duly authorized, and does not conflict with any of the
Borrower's organizational papers, and (d) this Amendment does not conflict with
any law, agreement, or obligation by which the Borrower is bound.

        4.      EFFECT OF AMENDMENT. Except as provided in this Amendment, all
of the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.

        This Amendment is executed as of the date stated at the beginning of
this Amendment.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.                    Calavo Growers of California

x     /s/ Eduardo Ordorica               x   /s/   EGIDIO CARBONE
 ------------------------------          -----------------------------------
By: Eduardo Ordorica                     By:  Egidio Carbone
    Assistant Vice President                  Vice President


                                         x
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         By:



                                     - 1 -
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CARL TROTTA, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Franh Metro*and *Mr. Franh B. Bozza*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Brendan T. Byrne*and *Mr. James R. Zazzali*for the respondent.

May 16, 1967.

Denied.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v HARVEY E. JONES, Chief Storekeeper (Acting), U. S. Navy, Appellant

16 USCMA 248, 36 CMR 404

No. 19,323

April 29, 1966

*Fred W. Shields, Esquire,*and *Captain L. G. Bohlen,*USMC, were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel J. E. Hawthorn,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The issue presented by this appeal is the same as that in United States v Surtasky, 16 USCMA 241, 36 CMR 397. On our opinion therein, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Judges Ferguson and Kilday concur.
No. 49746.

#### Protests 92688-K, etc., of Louis Wolf *&*Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

An examination of the record disclosed that certain of the items in question are similar to those involved in Abstract 48406. In accordance therewith the claim at 40 percent was sustained as to these items.
December 19, 1960

No. 64983.

#### Instrumentation Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/4037 and 60/4038.

Abstract 64749. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*E. M. Roberts *v.*The Fire Commissioner.

—Writ of *certiorari*quashed on opinion in *People ex rel. Grafts*v. *The Fire Commissioner.*Barnard, P. J. dissenting.
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF POLICY

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Transmittal to Docket: Summary of the March 11, 2011, Public Meeting in 

New York, New York, regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s 

Implementation of Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review

FROM: Stuart C. Miles-McLean

Office of Regulatory Policy and Management

TO: Public Docket #EPA-HQ-OA-2011-0156: Improving Regulations: General

As called for by President Obama in Executive Order 13563, "to facilitate the periodic 

review of existing significant regulations," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is 

considering "how best to promote retrospective analysis of rules that may be outmoded, 

ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal 

them in accordance with what has been learned." 

As part of its retrospective review of regulations, EPA convened public meetings around 

the country to gather input on how we might design the plan we will use to periodically review 

our regulations. This Memo transmits to the docket a summary of the public meeting held on

March 11, 2011, in New York, New York.
#### Charles H. Roosevelt, *Appellant, v.*The Village of New Rochelle, *Respondent.*

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Gilbert, J.; Dyeman, J., dissenting.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14


           SCHEDULE OF RECIPIENTS OF EXECUTIVE SEPARATION AGREEMENT *


David Calabro
Marc A. Crisafulli
Jean-Pierre Desbiens
Kathleen McKeough
Jaymin Patel
Donald Sweitzer


* Schedule sets forth only Executive Officers of the Company who are recipients.
7200

#### SPERRY & HUTCHISON CO. v. CITY OF COLUMBIA.

Injunction. — A petition showing that agent of petitioner had been arrested by city authorities for violating a city ordinance and alleging the ordinance to be unconstitutional and asking that the city authorities be enjoined from enforcing the ordinance, does not show on its face that petitioner has no other adequate remedy.

Petition in the original jurisdiction of this Court by the Sperry & Hutchinson Company and D. E. Lusk for injunction against the city of Columbia, W. C. Cathcart, chief of police, C. C. Stanley, recorder, and Joseph R. Allen, auditor, setting forth that the petitioner was engaged in a system of advertising by trading stamps, which were sold to the merchants of the city, and redeemed by petitioners in goods, that contract had been made with merchants of the city, that the agent of petitioner had been arrested by the police authorities of the city because of its refusal to pay the license provided by city ordinance for carrying on the business of selling trading stamps, that he would be prosecuted under said ordinance every time he attempted to do this business without paying said license fee, that such prosecution was ruinous to the said business, that the ordinance was unconstitutional, unjust and discriminatory, and seeking a *578rule against defendants requiring them to show cause why they should not be enjoined from enforcing the ordinance.

*Messrs. Lyles & Lyles*and *John Hall Jones,*for petitioner.

May 25, 1909.

Per Curiam.

This is an application for a rule to show cause why a criminal proceeding should not be enjoined. The petition does not show upon its face that the petitioner has no other adequate remedy, and the application is, therefore, refused.
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 5,
2010 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2010-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.
The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive
Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                 |  | 
|                                     |  |                                 | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey               |  |  |  | Dated: March 26, 2013
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                   |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

Commission File Number: 333-85443-02

ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation issuer in respect of
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-8
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware      			363886007
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, IL 60602
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

248-643-2530
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 2000.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
2000.

Not applicable.