### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 1 of 21 

## UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTI ON AGENCY

WASHI NGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF PR

EVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES 

## MEMORANDUM Date: 23 - September- 200 9 Subject: Sp irodiclofen . Dietary Risk Assessment in Support of the Requested use on Avo cado, Black Sapote, Canistel, Mamey Sapote, Mango, Papaya, Sapodilla, and Star Apple. PC Code: 124871 DP Barcode: D 367559 Decision No.: 404221 Registration No. : 264 - 83 0 Petition No.: 8F7500 Regulatory Action: Section 3 Risk Assessment Type: s ingle chemical; dietary Case No.: none T XR No.: not applicable CAS No.: 148477 - 71 - 8 MRID Nos: none 40 CFR: 180.608 

## From/To : Tom Bloem , Chemist

Risk Assessment Branch I/Health Effects Division (RAB I/HED; 7509P) Through: Amelia Acierto, Chemist, RABIII/HED

Mohesen Sahafeyan, Chemist, RABVI/HED Dietary Exposure Science Advisory Council (DESAC) George F. Kramer, Ph.D., Senior Chemist HED/RAB1 (7509P) Executive Summary C hronic and cancer dietary risk assessments were conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model - Food Consumption Intake Database (DEEM - FCID  , ver. 2.03) in support of Section 3 registration for application of spirodiclofen to avocado, b lack s apote, c anistel, m amey s apote, m ango, p apaya, s apodilla, and s tar a pple . Acute dietary

risk assessment was not conducted since an appropriate endpoint attributable to a single dose was not identified for the general U.S. population or any population subgroup. The chronic and cancer anal ys es assumed the following: (1) average field trial residues ; (2) experimentally determined processing factors for apple and grape processed commodities and for citrus oil, peeled citrus, and citrus peel (DEEM (ver 7.81) defaults assumed for the remaining processed commodities); (3) BEAD projec ted average percent crop treated estimates for hop (92%), pome fruit (15%) , stone fruit (10%) , grape (7%) , and citrus (14%); (4) drinking water estimates derived from the Pesticide Root Zone/Exposure Analysis Modeling S ys tem (PRZM/EXAMS ) model (citrus appl ication scenario; 1 x 0.31 lb ai/acre) and (5) maximum reasonably balanced livestock diets . The resulting chronic risk estimates (food and water) were ≤3.3% cPAD and are not of concern to HED (infants (<1 ye ar old) were the most highl y exposed population) . The cancer risk estimate (food and water) for the U.S. population was 3 x 10 - 6 

## . The major contributors to the cancer analysis were hop (4 0 % ; assumes 100% transfer of residues from hop to beer; spirodiclofen Log KOW 

## = 5.83 ), water (19% ; 87% of the basin cropped and 100% crop treated), and orange (17% ; pending submission of a new processing study , default processing factors were assumed).

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 2 of 21 

## I. Introduction Dietary risk assessment incorporates both exposure and toxicity of a given pesticide. For acute an d chronic assessments, the risk is expressed as a percentage of a maximum acceptable dose (i.e., the dose which HED has concluded will result in no unreasonable adverse health effects). This dose is referred to as the population adjusted dose (PAD). The PAD is equivalent to point of departure (POD ; NOAEL , LOAEL, e.g.) divided by the required uncertainty

or safety factors. For acute and non - cancer chronic exposures, HED is concerned when estimated dietary risk exceeds 100% of the PAD. HED is generall y co ncerned when estimated cancer risk exceeds one in one million. References which discuss the acute and chronic risk assessments in more detail are available on the EPA/pesticides web site: “Available Information on Assessing Exposure from Pesticides, A User’s Guide,” 21 - JUN - 2000, web link: http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA PEST/2000/July

/Day- 12/6061.pdf ; or see SOP 99.6 (20 - AUG - 1999). The most recent dietary risk assessment f

or spirodiclofen was conducted by Mohsen Sahafeyan (D3 46757 , 3 - Jan - 200 8 ). II. Residue Information Residues of Concern in Plants and Livestock: Table 1 is a summary of the conclusion made by HED concerning the residues of concern in fruit crops , livestoc k, and drinking water (Risk Assessment Document : D285047 , M Clock - Rust et al , 22 - Jun - 2005; residue chemistry review s : D341847, T. Bloem, 25 - Oct - 2007 and D 359773, T. Bloem, 24 - Jun - 2009 ). Table 1 : Residues of Concern for Tolerance Expression and Risk A ssessment .

Matrix Residues included in Risk Assessment Residues included in Tolerance Expression Citrus fruit, Pome Fruit, Stone Fruit, Tree Nut 1 spirodiclofen spirodiclofen Grape 1 spirodiclofen spirodiclofen, BAJ 2510 Livestock - Ruminants spirodiclof en, BAJ 2510 spirodiclofen, BAJ 2510 Livestock - Poultry no data submitted Rotational Crops no data submitted Drinking Water spirodiclofen, BAJ 2510, BAJ 2740 - dihydroxy, BAJ 2740 - ketohydroxy not applicable 1 Pending the submission of the orange proces sing data, human - health risk assessments should assume default processing factors for all processed commodities excluding the processed commodities for apple and grape (D341847, T. Bloem, 25 - Oct - 2007). 

## Recommended Tolerances: The current petition is fo r application to avocado, b lack s apote, c anistel, m amey s apote, m ango, p apaya, s apodilla, and s tar a pple ( 1 x 0.31 lb ai/acre; 2 - day preharvest interval) . H ED determined that the conclusions concerning the residues of concern in the currently

registered f

ruit crops may

be extended to the requested crops (see Table 1). Based on the review of the residue chemistry data submitted in support of the current petition (D3 63343, T. Bloem, 22 - Sep - 2009 ), HED conclude d that a 1.0 ppm tolerance for residues of spirodiclofen per se in/on the requested crops is appropriate. Plant Residues Used in the Chronic/Cancer Risk Assessments: The chronic and cancer dietary anal ys es incorporated projected average percent crop treated estimates and average field trial residues (see Table 2 ) . Default processing factors were assumed for all commodities excluding the processed commodities derived from apple and grape and for citrus oil, peeled citrus, and citrus peel where experimentally determined processing factors were incorporated (see Table 2 ). To confirm that the projected percent crop treated estimates remained appropriate, HED requested a screening level usage analy sis (SLUA) for the registered crops (see Attachment 2). The projected percent crop treated estimates are gre ater than the SLUA for all relevant crops. Since the projected percent crop treated estimates are for crops registered in 2007, HED concludes that incorporation of the SLUA data into a dietary analysis is not appropriate at this time.

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 3 of 21 

## Livestock Residues Used in the Chronic/Cancer Risk Assessments: The recommended ruminant tolerances were based on maximum theoretical dietary burdens (no poultry/hog feed commodities proposed/registered). A more realistic dietary burden (DB) was calculated for ruminants u sing the revised Table 1 feed s tuffs. Guidance submitted along with the revised Table 1 indicates that all three feed commodities associated with spirodiclofen (dried citrus pulp (beef and dairy) , wet apple pomace (dairy

onl y) , and almond hulls (dairy onl y) ) are considered alternative feedstuffs and onl y one these should be included in livestock dietary burden calculations. Of these three commodities, almond hulls and wet apple pomace yi elds the highest dietary burden estimates for dairy and beef cattle, respectivel y. The guidance associated with revised Table 1 indicates that almond hulls can be fed at up to 10% of the dairy cattle diet but 5% is more likely . Since the refined livestock residue estimates are for a chronic anal ys is, HED concluded that alm ond hulls will be consumed at 5% of the dairy

cattle diet . In addition, the dietary burden calculations for diary cattle were used for determination of residues in tissues as diary cattle are ultimatel y slaughtered for meat. Tables 3 and 4 are summaries of the dietary burden calculations and ruminant residue estimate, respectivel y. Table 2: Summary of Residue Estim ates for the Chronic and Cancer Dietary Exposure Analyses. Matrix Avg Fld Trl Res and

Projected Ruminant Residues (ppm) % Crop

Treated E stimates 1 Processing Factors Crop Translation and/or Comments pome fruit apple 2

- 0.146 15 apple sauce - 0.07x ; dried apple - 0.18x ; peeled apple

- 0.15x ; juice - 0.03x - A pple and pear residues - D285249, T. Bloem, 18 - Apr - 2005 .

- A pple processing study - D 341847, T. Bloem, 25 - Oct - 2007 ; dried apple and apple juice processing factors translated to dried pear and pear juice.

- P er the suggestion of BEAD, the 15% projected average apple percent crop treated estimate was translated to all crops in the pome fruit crop group. pear2

- 0.239 15 dried pear - 0. 1 8x ; pear juice - 0.03x

citrus fruit orange 2

- 0.104 14 peeled fruit - 0.06x ; juice - 1.8x (default) ; oil - 69x ; peel - 1.2x - Orange, lemon, and grapefruit residues - D285249, T. Bloem, 18 - Apr - 2005 .

- Orange proc essing study - D285249, T. Bloem, 18 - Apr - 2005 ; orange peeled fruit and peel processing factors translates to all citrus peeled and peel commodities.

- P er the suggestion of BEAD, the 14% projected average orange percent crop treated was translated to all c itrus except grapefruit temple oranges . lemon 2

- 0.121 14 juice - 2.0x (default) grapefruit2

- 0.103 13 juice - 2.1x (default) tree nut almond2

- 0.023 100 -- - Al mond and pecan residues - D285249, T. Bloem, 18 - Apr - 2005 .

pecan 2

- 0.019 100 -- stone fruit peach 2

- 0.368 10 dried peach - 7.0 x (default) - Peach, plum and cherry residues - D285249, T. Bloem, 18 - Apr 2005 .

- per the suggestion of BEAD, the 10% projected average peach percent crop treated estimate was translated to all crops in the stone fruit crop group. plum2

- 0.068 10 prune dried - 5.0x (default) prune juice - 1.4x (default) cherry 2

- 0.286 10 juice - 1.5x (default) grape grape - 0.697 7 raisin - 4.3 x ; juice - 0.17 x - Grape residues - D285249, T. Bloem, 18 - Apr - 2005 ; grape processing fac tors - D341847, T. Bloem, 25 - Oct - 2007. h op h op - 11.6 92 -- - Hop residues - 47105301.der.doc (14 - day PHI ). avocado avocado - 0.110 100 -- - Avocado residue translated to black sapote, canistel, mamey sapote, mango, papaya, sapodilla, and star apple bas ed on Reviewer’s Guide and Summary of HED ChemSAC Approvals for Amending Commodity Definitions [40CFR § 180.1(h)] and Crop Group/Subgroups [40 CFR § 180.41] ( B. Schneider; 14 - Jun - 2002 ). Default processing factors assumed for papaya. cattle, goat, sheep , horse liver - 0.0009 -- --

- See Tables 3 and 4 .

- Residue in kidney translated to meat byproducts (highest of liver, kidney, and fat) .

- Since spirodiclofen may concentrate in milk fat (Kow=5.83), residues in milk fat were estimated using the default 25x mi lk fat concentration factor (0.0002 ppm x 25 = 0.005 ppm). kidney - 0.004 -- -- muscle - 0.0001 -- dried beef - 1.92x (default) fat - 0.0007 -- -- meat bypdcts - 0.00 4 -- -- whole milk - 0.0002 -- -- milk fat - 0.005 -- -- 1 See attachment 1. 2 Representative crops translated to the remaining crops according to HED SOP 2000.1.

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 4 of 21 Table 3: Calculation of Spirodiclofen Dietary Brudens. Feed Commodity % Dry Matter 1 % Diet 1 Average Residue (ppm) 2 Dietary Contribution (ppm) 3 Beef Cattle almond hull 90 5 7.20 0.40 MTDB -- 10 -- 0.41 Diary Cattle almond hull 90 5 7.20 0.40 MTDB -- 10 -- 0.41 1 Revised Table 1 Feedstuffs (June 2008) . 2 Average almond hull field trial residue (D285249, T. Bloem, 18 - Apr - 2005) 3 Dietary contribution = tolerance  % dry matter x % diet. 

### Table 4: Summary of Cattle Feeding Study and Projected Residue. Dose; ppm (DBx) Residue (ppm) Projected Residue Assuming a 0.41 ppm dietary burden Spirodiclofen BAJ 2510 Total liver 1.38 (3.4x) not analyzed 4.12 (10.0 x) not analyzed 13.75 (33.5x) <0.01 0.01 - 0.02 <0.02 - <0.03 0.0009 kidney 1.38 (3.4x) not analyzed 4.12 (10.0x) <0.01 <0.01 - 0.03 <0.01 - <0.04 0.004 13.75 (33.5x) <0.01 0.04 - 0.09 <0.05 - <0.10 0.003 muscle 1.38 (3.4x) not analyzed 4.12 (10.0x) not analyz ed 13.75 (33.5x) <0.002 <0.002 <0.004 0.0001 fat 1.38 (3.4x) not analyzed 4.12 (10.0x) <0.002 <0.002 <0.004 0.0004 13.75 (33.5x) 0.003 - 0.021 <0.002 - 0.008 <0.005 - 0.024 0.0007 wh ole milk

(days 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, and 28) 1 1.38 (3.4x) not analyze d 4.12 (10.0x) not analyzed 13.75 (33.5x) <0.001 - 0.003 <0.001 - 0.003 <0.002 - 0.006 0.0002 wh ey 2 1.38 (3.4x) not analyzed 4.12 (10.0x) not analyzed 13.75 (33.5x) <0.001 <0.001 - 0.001 <0.002 0.00006 cream2 1.38 (3.4x) not analyzed 4.12 (10.0x) not analyz ed 13.75 (33.5x) 0.005 - 0.012 <0.002 - 0.002 <0.008 - <0.014 0.0004 1 In milk collected from animals dosed at 13.75 ppm , combined residues of spirodiclofen and BAJ 2510 reached a plateau within the first week of treatment (  0.004 ppm); however, a peak of 0.006 ppm was observed in a single animal on day 20 of dosing. 2 A milk sample collected from animals dosed at 13.75 ppm with combined residues of 0.004 ppm was processed into whey and cream.

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 5 of 21 

## III. Drinking Water Data S urface and ground estimated drinking water concentrations were previously generated by the Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) us ing PRZM - EXAMS and Screening Concentration in Ground Water Model ( SCI - GROW ) , respectivel y ( D311291, F. Kahn, 4 - Jan 2005) . The SCI - GROW model was run using the highest application rate (1 x 0.53 lb ai/acre) and resulted in a point estimate of 0.44 ppb. Multiple crop scenarios were modeled using PRZM EXAMS (citrus, pecan, apple, peach, and grape; 87% cropped and 100% crop treated assumed) with citrus ( 1 x 0.31 lb ai/acre) resulting in the highest 1 - in - 10 - ye ar peak concentration (23.86 ppb), 1 - in - 10 - ye ar ye arl y average (4.99 ppb), and 30 - ye ar average (1.67 ppb). Since the applications rates proposed as part of the current petition are identical to the c itrus application rate, HED concludes that the previously generated water estimates remain relevant. Therefore, the chronic and cancer anal yses employed the citrus 1 - in - 10 - year ye arl y average (4.99 ppb) and 30 - ye ar average (1.67 ppb), respectivel y. IV. DEEM - FCID  Program and Consumption Information Spirodiclofen chronic dietary exposure assessments were conducted using the DEEM - FCID  (ver. 2.03), which incorporates consumption data from USDA’s CSFII (1994 - 1996 and 1998). The 1994 - 96, 98 data are bas ed on the reported consumption of more than 20,000 individuals over two non - consecutive survey day s. Foods “as consumed” ( i.e. , apple pie) are linked to EPA defined food commodities ( i.e. , apples, peeled fruit - cooked; fresh or N/S; baked; or wheat flour - cooked; fresh or N/S, baked) using publicl y available recipe translation files developed jointly by USDA/ARS and EPA. For chronic exposure assessment, consumption data are averaged for the entire U.S. population and within population subgroups, but for acute exposure assessment are retained as individual consumption events. Based on anal ys is of the 1994 - 96, 98 CSFII consumption data, which took into account dietary patterns and survey respondents, HED concluded that it is most appropriate to report ris k for the following population subgroups: the general U.S. population, all infants (<1 ye ar old), children 1 - 2, children 3 - 5, children 6 - 12, youth 13 - 19, adults 20 - 49, females 13 - 49, and adults 50+ years old. For chronic dietary

exposure assessment, an e stimate of the residue level in each food or foodform ( i.e. , orange or orange juice) on the food commodity residue list is multiplied by the average daily consumption estimate for that food/food form. The resulting residue consumption estimate for each f ood/food form is summed with the residue consumption estimates for all other food/food forms on the commodity

residue list to arrive at the total average estimated exposure. Exposure is expressed in mg/kg body weight/day and as a percent of the cPAD. Thi s procedure is performed for each population subgroup.

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 6 of 21 

## IV. Toxicological Information Table 5 below summarizes the end points selected for dietary exposure analy ses; for more detailed discussion on these endpoints see the HED risk assessment D363343 ( in draft). Table 5: Summary of Toxicological Doses and Endpoints . Exposure/ Scenario Point of

Departure Uncertainty/FQPA

Safety Factors RfD, PAD, Level

of Concern Study and Toxicological Effects Acute Dietary An appropriate endpoint attributable to a sin gle dose was not identified. Chronic Dietary (All Populations) NOAEL=

1.38 mg/kg/day UF = 100

FQPA SF= 1x c RfD = 0.014

mg/kg/day cPAD = 0.014 mg/kg/day Chronic Oral Toxicity Study in Dogs : LOAEL= 4.7

mg/kg/day based on increased relative adrenal weights in both sexes, increased relative testis weight in males and histopathology findings in the adrenal gland of both sexes. Cancer Classification: “Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans” with Q1*(mg/kg/day) - 1 = 1.49 x 10 - 2. Point of Departure (POD) = A data point or an estimated point that is derived from observed dose - response data and used to mark the beginning of extrapolation to determine risk associated with lower environmentally relevant human exposures. NOAEL = no observed adverse effect level. LO AE L = lowest observed adverse effect level. UF = uncertainty factor. FQPA SF = FQPA Safety Factor. RfD = reference dose. 

## V. Results/Discussion The chronic risk estimates (food and water) were ≤3.3% cPAD and are not of concern to HED (infants (<1 ye ar old) were the most highl y exposed population). The cancer risk estimate (food and water) for the U.S. population was 3 x 10 - 6



## . Table 6: Summary of Chronic Dietary Exposure and Risk. Population Subgroup cPAD (mg/kg/day) Exposure (mg/kg/day) %cPAD 1 General U.S. Population

0.014 0.00025 6 1.8 All Infants (< 1 year old) 0.000455 3.3 Children 1 - 2 years old 0.000432 3.1 Children 3 - 5 years old 0.000351 2.5 Children 6 - 12 years old 0.000213 1.5 Youth 13 - 19 years old 0.000162 1.2 Females 13 - 49 year s old 0.000 201 1.4 Adults 20 - 49 years old 0.00028 3 2.0 Adults 50+ years old 0.00021 3 1.5 1 The bolded %cPAD represents the population with highest risk. Table 7: Summary of Cancer Dietary Exposure and Risk. Population Subgroup Q 1 * Exposure (mg/kg/day) Risk General U.S. Population 0.0149 0.00018 6 3 x 10 - 6

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 7 of 21 

## VI. Characterization of Inputs/Outputs The chronic and cancer analyses assumed the following: (1) average field trial residues ; (2) experimentally

determined processing factors for apple and grape processed commodities and for citrus oil, peeled citrus, and citrus peel (DEEM (ver 7.81) defaults assumed for the remaining processed commodities); (3) BEAD projected average percent crop treated estimates for hop (92%), apple (15%) , peach (10%) , grape (7%) , and orange (14%) ; (4) drinking water estimates derived from the PRZM/EXAMS model (citrus application scenario; 1 x 0.31 lb ai/acre) ; and (5) maximum reasonably

balanced livestock diets. In response to an HED inquiry , BEAD indicated that it is a ppropriate to translate the projected percent crop treated estimates for peach, apple, and orange to the remaining crops in the stone fruit, pome fruit, and citrus crop groups, respectively . Since the anal ys is made use of average residues derived from c rop field trial studies (maximum application rate and minimum preharvest interval), incorporated maximum theoretical processing factors for citrus juice , and incorporated surface drinking water estimates which assumed 87% of the basin i s cropped and 100% o f the crops are treated at the maximum rate, HED concludes that the exposure estimates provided in this document are unlikel y to underestimate actual exposure. HED is generally

concerned when the cancer risk exceeds 10 - 6



## . Based on a critical commodity an al ys is conducted in DEEM - FCID  , the major contributors to the cancer risk were hops (40% of the total exposure), water (19% of the total exposure), and orange juice (16% of the total exposure). HED notes the following concerning the residue estimates for hop, water, and orange juice: (1) hop - DEEM - FCID  assumes that 100% of the residue in hops are transferred to beer during the brewing process (no residue remain in/on the spent hops); based on the spirodiclofen log KOW 

## of 5.83, this is a conservative ass umption; in addition, assumed 92% crop treated for hops (average projected percent crop treated estimate); (2) water - the water residue estimate assumed 87% of the basin is cropped with 100% of the crops treated; and (3) orange juice - pending the submiss ion of a new orange processing study , default citrus juice processing factors are to be assumed (D341847, T. Bloem, 25 - Oct - 2007); in addition, assumed 14% crop treated for orange juice (average projected percent crop treated estimate). Therefore, HED conc ludes that the cancer risk estimate provided in this assessment is conservative and actual cancer risk will be significantl y lower than 3 x 10 - 6



## . HED notes that spirodiclofen PDP monitoring data are available for almonds, apple juice, raisin, and heavy cream (<LOD residues in/on all samples). Since these commodities contributed only 4% to the total cancer exposure estimate, it was determined that incorporation of these data were unnecessary .

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 8 of 21 

## VII. Conclusions Aggregate (food + water) chronic and canc er dietary risk anal ys es for spirodiclofen were conducted using DEEM - FCID (ver 2.00) to support the Section 3 registration of spirodiclofen on avocado, b lack s apote, c anistel, m amey s apote, m ango, p apaya, s apodilla, and s tar a pple . The chronic and cancer anal yses assumed the following: (1) average field trial residues ; (2) experimentally

determined processing factors for apple and grape processed commodities and for citrus oil, peeled citrus, and citrus peel (DEEM (ver 7.81) defaults assumed for the remaining processed commodities); (3) BEAD projected average percent crop treated estimates for hop (92%), pome fruit (15%) , stone fruit (10%) , grape (7%) , and citrus (14%) ; (4) drinking water estimates derived from the PRZM/EXAMS model (citrus application scen ario; 1 x 0.31 lb ai/acre) ; and (5) maximum reasonabl y balanced livestock diets. The resulting chronic risk estimates (food and water) were ≤3.3% cPAD and are not of concern to HED ( infants (<1 ye ar old) were the most highly exposed population) . The canc er risk estimate (food and water) for the U.S. population was 3 x 10 - 6



## . The major contributors to the cancer risk were hop (40%), water (19%), and orange juice (16%). VIII. List of Attachments Attachment 1: BEAD Projected Percent Crop Treated Estimate s . Attachment 2: BEAD S LUA Attachment 2: DEEM - FCID  C hronic Residue F ile . Attachment 3: DEEM - FCID  C hronic Exposure E stimates . Attachment 4: DEEM - FCID  C ancer Residue F ile . Attachment 5: DEEM - FCID  C ancer Exposure E stimates . Attachment 6: DEEM - FCID  C ritic al C ommodity Anal ys is for C ancer . cc with all attachments: J. Herbert/Rita Kumar (RD; RM 07; 7505P ) T. Bloem:S10945:Potomac Yard 1:703 - 605 - 0217:7509P:RAB1

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 9 of 21 

## Attachment 1: BEAD Projected Percent Crop Treated Estimates ; (J. Alsadek, DP # 340691, August 200 7) Crop/New Use Market Leader AVG. PCT/Chronic Max. PCT/Acute Year ML Avg. Hops Abamectin Abamectin 97 92 99

84 92 99 Oranges, excluding Temples Abamectin Abamectin Abamectin 05 03 01 16

12 14 14 16 Grapes, All Fenpropathrin/Imidacloprid Abamectin Propargite 05 03 01 8

5 9 7 9 Peaches Hexythiazox Fenbutatin - oxide Fenbutatin - oxide 05 03 01 7

11 13 10 13 Apples Py ridaben Fenpropathrin/Formetanate Py ridaben 05 03 01 16

12 17 15 17 

## References: National Center for Food & Agricultural Policy (NC FAP), 1992 and 1997 Agricultural Chemical Usage 2001 Fruit Summary, August 2002 Agricultural Chemical Usage 2003 Fruit Summary, August 2004 Agricultural Chemical Usage 2005 Fruit Summary, July 2006 Note: Average %CT of 13% for grapefruit, based on its use in 2005 was recommended b y J . Alsadek (personal communication, 11/20/07)

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 10 of 21 

## Attachment 2: BEAD SLUA

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 11 of 21

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 12 of 21

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 13 of 21 

## Attachment 3 : DEEM - FCID  C hronic Residue F ile . Filename: C: \ Documents and Settings \ tbloem \ spirodiclofen \ tropical fruit \ 124871chronic.R98 Che mical: spirodiclofen RfD(Chronic): .014 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Chronic): 1.38 mg/kg bw/day RfD(Acute): 0 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Acute): 0 mg/kg bw/day Q*= .0149 Date created/last modified: 08 - 04 - 2009/07:41:30/8 Program ver. 2.03 Comment: no acute endpoin t identified; 100x uncertainity factor for chronic

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA Crop Def Res Adj.Factors Comment Code Grp Commodity Name (ppm) #1 #2

-------- ---- ------------------------------- ---------- ------ ------ ------- 95000200 O Avocado 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95000740 O Canistel 0.110000 1.000 1 .000 95001750 O Grape 0.697000 1.000 0.070 95001760 O Grape, juice 0.697000 0.170 0.070 95001761 O Grape, juice - babyfood 0.697000 0.170 0.070 95001770 O Grape, lea ves 0.697000 1.000 0.070 95001780 O Grape, raisin 0.697000 4.300 0.070 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 0.697000 1.000 0.070 95001880 O Hop 11.6000 00 1.000 0.920 95002150 O Mango 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002151 O Mango - babyfood 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002160 O Mango, dried 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002170 O Mango, juice 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002171 O Mango, juice - babyfood 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002450 O Papaya 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002451 O Papaya - babyfood 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002460 O Papaya, dried 0.110000 1.800 1.000 95002470 O Papaya, juice 0.110000 1.500 1.000 95003330 O Sapote, Mamey 0.110000 1.000 1.000 86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.004990 1.000 1.000 86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.004990 1.000 1.000 21000440 M Beef, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 21000441 M Beef, meat - baby food 0.000100 1.000 1.000 21000450 M Beef, meat, dried 0.000100 1.920 1.000 21000460 M Beef, meat byproducts 0.004000 1.000 1.000 21000461 M Beef, meat byproducts - babyfood 0.004000 1.000 1.000 21000470 M Beef, fat 0.000700 1.000 1.000 21000471 M Beef,fat - babyfood 0.000700 1.000 1.000 21000480 M Beef, kidney 0.004000 1.000 1.000 21000490 M Be ef, liver 0.000900 1.000 1.000 21000491 M Beef, liver - babyfood 0.000900 1.000 1.000 23001690 M Goat, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 23001700 M Goat, meat byproducts 0.004000 1.000 1.000 23001710 M Goat, fat 0.000700 1.000 1.000 23001720 M Goat, kidney 0.004000 1.000 1.000 23001730 M Goat, liver 0.000900 1.000 1.000 240 01890 M Horse, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 26003390 M Sheep, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 26003391 M Sheep, meat - babyfood 0.000100 1.000 1.000 26003400 M Sheep, meat byproduc ts 0.004000 1.000 1.000 26003410 M Sheep, fat 0.000700 1.000 1.000 26003411 M Sheep, fat - babyfood 0.000700 1.000 1.000 26003420 M Sheep, kidney 0.004000 1.000 1.000 26003430 M Sheep, liver 0.000900 1.000 1.000 27002220 D Milk, fat 0.005000 1.000 1.000 27002221 D Milk, fat - baby food/infant for 0.005000 1.000 1.000 27012230 D Milk, n onfat solids 0.000200 1.000 1.000 27012231 D Milk, nonfat solids - baby food/in 0.000200 1.000 1.000 27022240 D Milk, water 0.000200 1.000 1.000 27022241 D Milk, water - babyfood/infant form 0.0 00200 1.000 1.000 27032251 D Milk, sugar (lactose) - baby food/ 0.000200 1.000 1.000 10001060 10 Citrus citron 0.104000 1.000 0.140

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 14 of 21 10001070 10 Citrus hybrids 0.104000 0.060 0.140 10001080 10 Citrus, oil 0.121000 69.000 0.140 10001800 10 Grapefruit 0.103000 0.060 0.130 10001810 10 Grapefruit, juice 0.103000 2.100 0.130 10001970 10 Kumquat 0.104000 0.060 0.140 10001990 10 Lemon 0.121000 0.060 0.140 10002000 10 Lemon, juice 0.121000 2.000 0.140 10002001 10 Lemon, juice - babyfood 0.121000 2.000 0.1 40 10002010 10 Lemon, peel 0.121000 1.200 0.140 10002060 10 Lime 0.121000 0.060 0.140 10002070 10 Lime, juice 0.121000 2.000 0.140 10002071 10 Lime, juice - babyfood 0.121000 2.000 0.140 10002400 10 Orange 0.104000 0.060 0.140 10002410 10 Orange, juice 0.104000 1.800 0.140 10002411 10 Orange, juice - babyfood 0.104000 1.800 0.140 10002420 10 Orange, peel 0.104000 1.200 0.140 10003070 10 Pummelo 0.103000 0.060 0.140 10003690 10 Tangerine 0.104000 0.060 0.140 10003700 10 Tangerine, juice 0.104000 2.300 0.140 11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.146000 1.000 0.150 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.146000 0.150 0.150 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit - babyfood 0.146000 0.150 0.150 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.146000 0.180 0.150 11000091 11 Apple, dried - babyfood 0.146000 0.180 0.150 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.146000 0.030 0.150 11000101 11 Apple, juice - babyfood 0.146000 0.030 0.150 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.146000 0.070 0.150 11000111 11 Apple, sauce - babyfood 0.146000 0.070 0.150 11001290 11 Crabapple 0.146000 1.000 0.150 11002100 11 Loquat 0.239000 1.000 0.150 11002660 11 Pear 0.239000 1.000 0.150 11002661 11 Pear - babyfood 0.239000 1. 000 0.150 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.239000 0.180 0.150 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.239000 0.030 0.150 11002681 11 Pear, juice - babyfood 0.239000 0.030 0.150 11003100 11 Quin ce 0.239000 1.000 0.150 12000120 12 Apricot 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12000121 12 Apricot - babyfood 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12000130 12 Apricot, dried 0.368000 6.000 0.100 12000140 12 Apricot, juice 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12000141 12 Apricot, juice - babyfood 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12000900 12 Cherry 0.286000 1.000 0.100 12000 901 12 Cherry - babyfood 0.286000 1.000 0.100 12000910 12 Cherry, juice 0.286000 1.500 0.100 12000911 12 Cherry, juice - babyfood 0.286000 1.500 0.100 12002300 12 Nectarine 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12002600 12 Peach 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12002601 12 Peach - babyfood 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12002610 12 Peach, dried 0.368000 7.000 0.100 12002611 12 Peach, dried - babyfood 0.368000 7.000 0.100 12002620 12 Peach, juice 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12002621 12 Peach, juice - babyfood 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12002850 12 Plum 0.068000 1.000 0.100 12002851 12 Plum - babyfood 0.068000 1.000 0.100 12002860 12 Plum, prune, fresh 0.068000 1.000 0.100 12002861 12 Plum, prune, fresh - babyfood 0.068 000 1.000 0.100 12002870 12 Plum, prune, dried 0.068000 5.000 0.100 12002871 12 Plum, prune, dried - babyfood 0.068000 5.000 0.100 12002880 12 Plum, prune, juice 0.068000 1.400 0.100 12002881 1 2 Plum, prune, juice - babyfood 0.068000 1.400 0.100 14000030 14 Almond 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14000031 14 Almond - babyfood 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14000040 14 Almond, oil 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14000041 14 Almond, oil - babyfood 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14000590 14 Brazil nut 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14000680 14 Butternut 0.019000 1.000 1.000

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 15 of 21 14000810 14 Cashew 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14000920 14 Chestnut 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14001550 14 Filbert 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14001560 14 Filbert, oil 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14001850 14 Hickory nut 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14002130 14 Macadamia nut 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14002690 14 Pecan 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14002820 14 Pistachio 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14003910 14 Walnut 0.019000 1.000 1.000

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 16 of 21 

## Attachment 4 : DEEM - FCID  C hronic Exposure E stimates. U.S. Environmental Protection Agen cy Ver. 2.00 DEEM - FCID Chronic analysis for SPIRODICLOFEN (1994 - 98 data) Residue file name: C: \ Documents and Settings \ tbloem \ spirodiclofen \ tropical fruit \ 124871chronic.R98 Adjustment factor #2 used. Analysis Date 08 - 04 - 2009/07:44:23 Residue file dated: 08 - 04 - 2009/07:41:30/8 Reference dose (RfD, Chronic) = .014 mg/kg bw/day COMMENT 1: no acute endpoint identified; 100x uncertainity factor for chronic

= ============================================================================== Total exposure by population subgroup

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Exposure

----------------------------------- Population mg/kg Percent of Subgroup body wt/day Rfd

-------------------------------------- ------------- --------------- U.S. Population (total) 0.000256 1.8% U.S. Population (spring season) 0.000271 1.9% U.S. Population (summer se ason) 0.000275 2.0% U.S. Population (autumn season) 0.000239 1.7% U.S. Population (winter season) 0.000241 1.7% Northeast region 0.000249 1.8% Midwest region 0.000263 1.9% Southern region 0.000231 1.6% Western region 0.000297 2.1% Hispanics 0.000273 1.9% Non - hispanic whites 0.000260 1.9% Non - hispanic blacks 0.000219 1.6% Non - hisp/non - white/non - black 0.000271 1.9% All infants (< 1 year) 0.000455 3.3% Nursing infants 0.000192 1.4% Non - nursing infants 0.000555 4.0% Children 1 - 6 yrs 0.000366 2.6% Children 7 - 12 yrs 0.000200 1.4% Females 13 - 19 (not preg or nursing) 0.000141 1.0% Females 20+ (not preg or nursing) 0.000205 1.5% Females 13 - 50 yrs 0.000215 1.5% Females 13+ (preg/not nursing) 0.000198 1.4% Females 13+ (nursing) 0.000230 1.6% Mal es 13 - 19 yrs 0.000181 1.3% Males 20+ yrs 0.000315 2.3% Seniors 55+ 0.000205 1.5% Children 1 - 2 yrs 0.000432 3.1% Children 3 - 5 yrs 0.000351 2.5% Children 6 - 12 yrs 0.000213 1.5% Youth 13 - 19 yrs 0.000162 1 .2% Adults 20 - 49 yrs 0.000283 2.0% Adults 50+ yrs 0.000213 1.5% Females 13 - 49 yrs 0.000201 1.4%

----------------------------- --------------------------------------------------

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 17 of 21 

## Attachment 5 : DEEM - FCID  C ancer Residue F ile. Filename: C: \ Documents and Settings \ tbloem \ spirodiclofen \ tropical fruit \ 124871cancer.R98 Chemical: spirodiclofen RfD(Chronic): .014 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Chron ic): 1.38 mg/kg bw/day RfD(Acute): 0 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Acute): 0 mg/kg bw/day Q*= .0149 Date created/last modified: 08 - 04 - 2009/07:42:18/8 Program ver. 2.03 Comment: no acute endpoint identified; 100x uncertainity factor for chronic

------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA Crop Def Res Adj.Factors Comment Code Grp Commodity Name (ppm) #1 #2

-------- ---- ------------------- ------------ ---------- ------ ------ ------- 95000200 O Avocado 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95000740 O Canistel 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95001750 O Grape 0.697000 1.000 0.070 95001760 O Grape, juice 0.697000 0.170 0.070 95001761 O Grape, juice - babyfood 0.697000 0.170 0.070 95001770 O Grape, leaves 0.697000 1.000 0.070 95001780 O Grape, raisin 0.697000 4.300 0.070 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 0.697000 1.000 0.070 95001880 O Hop 11.600000 1.000 0.920 95002150 O Mango 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002151 O Mango - babyfood 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002160 O Mango, dried 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002170 O Mango, juice 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002171 O Mango, juice - babyfood 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002450 O Papaya 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002451 O Papaya - babyfood 0.110000 1.000 1.000 95002460 O Papaya, dried 0.110000 1.800 1.000 95002470 O Papaya, juice 0.110000 1.500 1.000 95003330 O Sapote, Mamey 0.110000 1.000 1.000 86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.001670 1. 000 1.000 86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.001670 1.000 1.000 21000440 M Beef, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 21000441 M Beef, meat - babyfood 0.000100 1.000 1.000 21000450 M Beef , meat, dried 0.000100 1.920 1.000 21000460 M Beef, meat byproducts 0.004000 1.000 1.000 21000461 M Beef, meat byproducts - babyfood 0.004000 1.000 1.000 21000470 M Beef, fat 0.000700 1.000 1.000 21000471 M Beef,fat - babyfood 0.000700 1.000 1.000 21000480 M Beef, kidney 0.004000 1.000 1.000 21000490 M Beef, liver 0.000900 1.000 1.000 21000 491 M Beef, liver - babyfood 0.000900 1.000 1.000 23001690 M Goat, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 23001700 M Goat, meat byproducts 0.004000 1.000 1.000 23001710 M Goat, fat 0.000700 1.000 1.000 23001720 M Goat, kidney 0.004000 1.000 1.000 23001730 M Goat, liver 0.000900 1.000 1.000 24001890 M Horse, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 26003390 M Sheep, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 26003391 M Sheep, meat - babyfood 0.000100 1.000 1.000 26003400 M Sheep, meat byproducts 0.004000 1.000 1.000 26003410 M Sheep, fa t 0.000700 1.000 1.000 26003411 M Sheep, fat - babyfood 0.000700 1.000 1.000 26003420 M Sheep, kidney 0.004000 1.000 1.000 26003430 M Sheep, liver 0.000 900 1.000 1.000 27002220 D Milk, fat 0.005000 1.000 1.000 27002221 D Milk, fat - baby food/infant for 0.005000 1.000 1.000 27012230 D Milk, nonfat solids 0.000200 1.000 1.000 27012231 D Milk, nonfat solids - baby food/in 0.000200 1.000 1.000 27022240 D Milk, water 0.000200 1.000 1.000 27022241 D Milk, water - babyfood/infant form 0.000200 1.000 1.000 27032251 D Milk, sugar (lactose) - baby food/ 0.000200 1.000 1.000 10001060 10 Citrus citron 0.104000 1.000 0.140

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 18 of 21 10001070 10 Citrus hybrids 0.104000 0.060 0.140 10001080 10 Citrus, oil 0.121000 69.000 0.140 10001800 10 Grapefruit 0.103000 0.060 0.130 10001810 10 Grapefruit, juice 0.103000 2.100 0.130 10001970 10 Kumquat 0.104000 0.060 0.140 10001990 10 Lemon 0.121000 0.060 0.140 10002000 10 Lemon, juice 0.121000 2.000 0.140 10002001 10 Lemon, juice - babyfood 0.121000 2.000 0.140 10002010 10 Lemon, peel 0.121000 1.200 0.140 10002060 10 Lime 0.121000 0.060 0.140 10002070 10 Lime, juice 0.121000 2.000 0.140 10002071 10 Lime, juice - babyfood 0.121000 2.000 0.140 10002400 10 O range 0.104000 0.060 0.140 10002410 10 Orange, juice 0.104000 1.800 0.140 10002411 10 Orange, juice - babyfood 0.104000 1.800 0.140 10002420 10 Orange, peel 0.104000 1.200 0.140 10003070 10 Pummelo 0.103000 0.060 0.140 10003690 10 Tangerine 0.104000 0.060 0.140 10003700 10 Tangerine, juice 0.104000 2.300 0.140 11 000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.146000 1.000 0.150 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.146000 0.150 0.150 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit - babyfood 0.146000 0.150 0.150 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.146000 0.180 0.150 11000091 11 Apple, dried - babyfood 0.146000 0.180 0.150 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.146000 0.030 0.150 11000101 11 Apple, juice - babyfood 0.146000 0.03 0 0.150 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.146000 0.070 0.150 11000111 11 Apple, sauce - babyfood 0.146000 0.070 0.150 11001290 11 Crabapple 0.146000 1.000 0.150 11002100 11 Loquat 0.239000 1.000 0.150 11002660 11 Pear 0.239000 1.000 0.150 11002661 11 Pear - babyfood 0.239000 1.000 0.150 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0. 239000 0.180 0.150 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.239000 0.030 0.150 11002681 11 Pear, juice - babyfood 0.239000 0.030 0.150 11003100 11 Quince 0.239000 1.000 0.150 1200012 0 12 Apricot 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12000121 12 Apricot - babyfood 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12000130 12 Apricot, dried 0.368000 6.000 0.100 12000140 12 Apricot, juice 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12000141 12 Apricot, juice - babyfood 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12000900 12 Cherry 0.286000 1.000 0.100 12000901 12 Cherry - babyfood 0.286000 1.000 0. 100 12000910 12 Cherry, juice 0.286000 1.500 0.100 12000911 12 Cherry, juice - babyfood 0.286000 1.500 0.100 12002300 12 Nectarine 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12002600 12 Peach 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12002601 12 Peach - babyfood 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12002610 12 Peach, dried 0.368000 7.000 0.100 12002611 12 Peach, dried - babyfood 0.36800 0 7.000 0.100 12002620 12 Peach, juice 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12002621 12 Peach, juice - babyfood 0.368000 1.000 0.100 12002850 12 Plum 0.068000 1.000 0.100 12002851 12 Plum - babyfood 0.068000 1.000 0.100 12002860 12 Plum, prune, fresh 0.068000 1.000 0.100 12002861 12 Plum, prune, fresh - babyfood 0.068000 1.000 0.100 12002870 12 Plum, prune, dried 0.068000 5.000 0.100 12002871 12 Plum, prune, dried - babyfood 0.068000 5.000 0.100 12002880 12 Plum, prune, juice 0.068000 1.400 0.100 12002881 12 Plum, prune, juice - babyfood 0.068000 1.400 0.100 14000030 14 Almond 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14000031 14 Almond - babyfood 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14000040 14 Almond, oil 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14000041 14 Almond, oil - baby food 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14000590 14 Brazil nut 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14000680 14 Butternut 0.019000 1.000 1.000

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 19 of 21 14000810 14 Cashew 0.019000 1 .000 1.000 14000920 14 Chestnut 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14001550 14 Filbert 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14001560 14 Filbert, oil 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14001850 14 Hic kory nut 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14002130 14 Macadamia nut 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14002690 14 Pecan 0.019000 1.000 1.000 14002820 14 Pistachio 0.023000 1.000 1.000 14003910 14 Walnut 0.019000 1.000 1.000

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 20 of 21 

## Attachment 6 : DEEM - FCID  C ancer Exposure E stimates . U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00 DEEM - FCID Chronic an alysis for SPIRODICLOFEN (1994 - 98 data) Residue file name: C: \ Documents and Settings \ tbloem \ spirodiclofen \ tropical fruit \ 124871cancer.R98 Adjustment factor #2 used. Analysis Date 08 - 04 - 2009/07:44:45 Residue file dated: 08 - 04 - 2009/07:42:18/8 Q* = 0.0149 COMMENT 1: no acute endpoint identified; 100x uncertainity factor for chronic

=============================================================================== Tota l exposure by population subgroup

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Exposure

--------------------------------- -- Population mg/kg Lifetime risk Subgroup body wt/day (Q*= .0149)

-------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- U.S. Population (total) 0.000186 2.78E - 06

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

### Spirodiclofen Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D367559

Page 21 of 21 

## Attachment 7 : DEEM - FCID  C ritical C ommodity Anal ys is for C ancer . U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver . 2.00 DEEM - FCID Chronic analysis for SPIRODICLOFEN (1994 - 98 data) Residue file name: C: \ Documents and Settings \ tbloem \ spirodiclofen \ tropical fruit \ 124871cancer.R98 Adjustment factor # 2 used. Analysis Date 08 - 04 - 2009/07:45:03 Residue file dated: 08 - 04 - 2009/07:42:18/8 Q* = 0.0149 COMMENT 1: no acute endpoint identified; 100x uncertainity factor for chronic

============================================================================= == Critical Commodity Contribution Analysis for

U.S. Population (total) Total Exposure =.0001864 mg/kg bw/day Crop groups with total exposure contribution > 5% Foods/ Foodforms with exposure contribution > 5%

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Crop group ----------- Exposure analysis ---------- Food mg/kg | % of Total| Lifetime Risk Foodform body wt/day| Exposure |(Q*= .0149)

-------------------------------------- ----------- | ----------- | -------------- Crop Group = (O) Other Hop (95001880): FoodForm N/S 0.0000746 40.05% 1.11E - 06 Water, direct, all sources (86010000): FoodForm N/S 0.0000203 10.87% 3.02E - 07 Water, indirect, all sources (86020000): FoodForm N/S 0.0000149 8.01% 2.23E - 07

-------------------------------------- ----------- | ----------- | -------------- Total for crop group 0.0001319 70.77% 1.97E - 06 Crop Group = (10) Citrus Fruits Orange, juice (10002410): FoodForm N/S 0.0000307 16.45% 4.57E - 07

-------------------------------------- ----------- | ----------- | -------------- Total for crop group 0.0000341 18.27% 5.07E - 07 Crop Group = (11) Pome Fruits Total for crop group 0.0000106 5.67% 1.57E - 07 Total for crop groups listed above: 0.0001765 94.71% 2.63E - 06

------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------