alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. GP94-2-016] 

                    Take notice that on March 20, 2007, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing its Refund Report made to comply with the April 17, 1995 Settlement (Settlement) in Docket No. GP94-2,                     *et al.*                     as approved by the Commission on June 15, 1995 (Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., 71 FERC ¶ 61,337 (1995)).                 

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 3, 2007.                 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-5995 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 35.1

1123  Servicer Compliance Statement

I, Joseph Guage, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of The Student Loan Corporation (SLC), the servicer under the servicing agreement and the administrator under the administration agreement each among SLC, SLC Student Loan Receivables I, Inc. and certain others
(together, the servicing agreements) relating to SLC Student Loan Trust 2004-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-3, SLC Student Loan Trust 2006-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2006-2,
SLC Private Student Loan Trust 2006-A, SLC Student Loan Trust 2007-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2007-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2008-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2008-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2009-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2009-2, SLC Student Loan Trust
2009-3 and SLC Student Loan Trust 2010-1, (each, a publicly issued trust), certify that:



|(a) | A review of SLCs activities as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Reporting Period) and of SLCs performance under the
servicing agreement for each trust has been made under my supervision.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, SLC has fulfilled all of its obligations under the servicing agreement related to each trust in all material respects
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 19, 2012



By:

/s/ Joseph GuageName:

Joseph GuageTitle:

VP and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Campus Crest Communities, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) [language omitted in accordance with SEC Release No. 34-54942] for the registrant
and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Language omitted in accordance with SEC Release No. 34-54942];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/    Ted W. RollinsTed W. RollinsCo-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6653.

Entry No. 162, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, May 28, 1941, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., July 11, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 20, 1946)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General,'for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers, on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

JUDGMENT IN CIVIL CASE 

Boards of Trustees of Ohio 

Laborers’ Fringe Benefit 

Programs, 

 Case No. 2:10-cv-1032

Plaintiffs, 

v. JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

 

Ohio Building Restoration Co., Magistrate Judge Kemp

Defendant. 

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have

been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That pursuant to the

November 21, 2011 Opinion and Order, the Court GRANTED

plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment, supplemental motion for

default judgment, and second supplemental motion for default

judgment (Docs. 14, 15 and 16). Judgment is entered against

defendant in the total amount of $11,175.77, with interest on

$8,030.52 of that amount to run at the contract rate. This

action is hereby TERMINATED.

Date: November 21, 2011 James Bonini, Clerk

 s/Betty L. Clark 

 Betty L. Clark/Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:10-cv-01032-ALM-TPK Doc #: 18 Filed: 11/21/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### Arthur Frederick GOODE, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 82-5244.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 27, 1984.

Wilbur C. Smith, III, Fort Meyers, Fla., for petitioner-appellant.

Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and HOFFMAN *, District Judge.

*

 Honorable Walter E. Hoffman, U.S. District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Upon the authority of *Wainwright v. Goode,*— U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 378, 78 L.Ed.2d 187 (1983), reversing *Goode v. Wainwright,*704 F.2d 593 (11th Cir.1983), the judgment of the district court in the above-entitled case is

AFFIRMED.
No. 50569.

#### Protests 92706-K, etc., of Armour & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the reliquidation of the entries herein involved is similar in all material respects to that in *Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 7, C. D. 932). In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, judgment was entered directing the collector to reliquic(ate the entries herein, refunding the duty established to have been taken in excess, in accordance with decision and judgment in Abstract 44860.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Benjamin L. DennyBenjamin L. DennyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of EDWARD J. LIGUORI, an attorney at law.

May 29, 1967.

Resignation without prejudice accepted.
# NORTHWESTALABAMA REGIONALAIRPORT 1729T. Ed CampbellDrive, Suite A, Muscle Shoals, Alabama 35661-2016 Phone: (256) 381-2869 Fax: (256) 381-2915

flymsl@aol.com www.flytheshoals.com 

## SERVING THE

## SHOALS! May 4, 2012 Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE, Washington, D.C. 20590 Reference: r::.- DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, 2000-7856 r'0 EAS>Muscle Shoals, AL, Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS and Tupelo, MS Dear Mr. DeVany, The Northwest Alabama Regional Airport Authority wishes to lend its support to the proposal ofSilver Airways to provide essential air service at Muscle Shoals, Alabama as replacement for current Delta Air Lines service. Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air transportation system is critical to the economic well-being ofMuscle Shoals, Alabama and to the Northwest Alabama Regional Airport Authority. The Northwest Alabama Regional Airport Authority and the communities of North Alabama rely on our local air service for both business and leisure travel. The SilverAirways proposals offer us a modem 34-seatturboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, which is not only the largest hub airport in the world, but also a popular business and leisure travel destination from the Northwest Alabama Regional Airport in its own right. The Northwest Alabama Regional Airport Authority believes the Silver air service proposal represents the best option for retaining our local air service long term and building up traffic so that government subsidies can eventually be reduced oreliminated. The Northwest AlabamaRegional Airport Authority urges thatthe Department ofTransportationtoward the SilverAirways designation to provide Muscle Shoals, Alabama essential air service. Bestregards,

Rick Elliott Chairman NorthwestAlabama Regional Airport Authority Cc: Congressman RobertAlderholt Congressman Mo Brooks SenatorJeffSessions Senator Richard Shelby GovernorRobert Bentley
Case: 2:10-cv-00967-EAS-TPK Doc #: 65 Filed: 01/13/12 Page: 1 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00967-EAS-TPK Doc #: 65 Filed: 01/13/12 Page: 2 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00967-EAS-TPK Doc #: 65 Filed: 01/13/12 Page: 3 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00967-EAS-TPK Doc #: 65 Filed: 01/13/12 Page: 4 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00967-EAS-TPK Doc #: 65 Filed: 01/13/12 Page: 5 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00967-EAS-TPK Doc #: 65 Filed: 01/13/12 Page: 6 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-07T16:15:06-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                         560487
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               560987
<PP&E>                                         164111
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 868070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          271718
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       965891
<OTHER-SE>                                     (619236)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   868070
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10669
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               261358
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             25991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (250689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (250689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (250689)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.03)


</TABLE>
#### Charles Jackson v. The People.

Error will not lie oil a conviction in the Recorder’s Court of Detroit for an offense against a city ordinance.

*Decided May*25th.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Distributed Energy Systems Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ambrose L. Schwallie, principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 8, 2007



|                           
|---------------------------
|/S/    AMBROSE L.
SCHWALLIE
|Ambrose L. Schwallie       
|Principal Executive Officer
December 21, 1960

No. 64984.

#### Laco Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/7990.

Abstract 64769. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
No. 50564.

#### Protests 71433-K, etc., of American Factors, Ltd., et al. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nippon Co.*(32 C. C. P. A. 164, C. A. D. 303), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith certain items of the merchandise were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1705 as kelp, and other items were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1540 as seaweeds, manufactured.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL PAUL HANDLESON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

CORIZON REGIONAL MEDICAL 

DIRECTOR; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-35187 

D.C. No. 1:17-cv-00216-BLW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 20, 2021**

Before: McKEOWN, CALLAHAN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Idaho state prisoner Michael Paul Handleson appeals pro se from the district 

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate 

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo a district court’s summary judgment for failure to 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 19-35187 

exhaust administrative remedies. Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1168 (9th Cir. 

2014). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Thompson v. Paul, 

547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Handleson’s 

claims against defendants Poulson, McCall, and Gelok because Handleson failed to 

exhaust his administrative remedies, and failed to raise a genuine dispute of 

material fact as to whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable. 

See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (proper exhaustion requires “using 

all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the agency 

addresses the issues on the merits)” (citation and internal quotation marks 

omitted)); see also Ross v. Blake, 136 S. Ct. 1850, 1859 (2016) (setting forth

circumstances when administrative remedies are effectively unavailable); Albino, 

747 F.3d at 1171-72 (requiring inmates to exhaust administrative procedures prior 

to filing suit in federal court). 

Summary judgment on Handleson’s claim against defendant Young was 

proper because Handleson failed to file his action within the applicable statute of 

limitations period. See Idaho Code § 5-219(4) (two-year statute of limitations for 

personal injury actions); Soto v. Sweetman, 882 F.3d 865, 871-72 (9th Cir. 2018) 

(state tolling and statute of limitations for personal injury claims apply to § 1983 
 3 19-35187 

claims; federal law governs when a claim accrues, which is when a plaintiff knows 

or should know of the injury that forms the basis for his cause of action).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
No. 51074.

#### Protest 972087-G of Butler Bros. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bonbon dishes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Butler Bros.*(33 C. C. P. A. 22, C. A. D. 310). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held properly dutiable, at 70 percent under paragraph 212 without the additional assessment of 10 cents per dozen pieces.