alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Auscrete Corporation (the “Company’) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, John Sprovieri, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 14th day of April, 2014.








/s/John Sprovieri/s/John SprovieriChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.16.1

                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO

                        ON-POINT TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.

                             1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN

          WHEREAS, On-Point Technology Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
     "Company") maintains the On-Point Technology Systems, Inc. 1994 Stock
     Option Plan (the "Plan") for the benefit of certain of its employees; and

          WHEREAS, prior to October 13, 2000, the Plan, as amended, permitted
     the issuance of options for 1,500,000 shares; and

          WHEREAS, the Company's Proxy Statement dated October 13, 2000 sought
     shareholder approval of an amendment to the Plan to increase the number of
     shares available under the Plan to 3,000,000 shares, which amendment was
     approved by the shareholders at a meeting held on December 8, 2000; and

          WHEREAS, between the date of the Proxy Statement and the date of the
     shareholders meeting, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a
     one-third for one reverse stock split which reduced the number of shares
     available under the Plan from 1,500,000 to 500,000 and effectively reduced
     the increase in the number of available shares for which shareholder
     approval was being sought from 3,000,000 shares to 1,000,000 shares.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the premises considered, the Plan, as amended, is further
amended as follows:

     1. The words and number "One Million Five Hundred Thousand (1,500,000)
shares" appearing in Sections 4 and 11 of the Plan shall be deleted in each
place and replaced with the words and number "One Million (1,000,000) shares."

     2. This Amendment shall be effective as of December 8, 2000.

     IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Company has executed this Third Amendment as of the
8th day of December, 2000.

                                            ON-POINT TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.


                                            By: /s/ Frederick Sandvick
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Frederick Sandvick,
                                                Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JAMES L. SMITH, Private E-1, U. S. Army, Appellant

9 USCMA 88, 25 CMR 350

No. 10,451

Decided March 28, 1958

*First Lieutenant William L. Garwood*argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief was *Colonel Edward M. O’Connell.*

*First Lieutenant Jay D. Fischer*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief was *Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee.*

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

At his trial by general court-martial, the appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offenses of absence without leave and escape from confinement, in violation of Articles 86 and 95, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886 and 895, respectively. He was also charged with the offense of desertion, in violation of Article 85 of the Code, supra, 10 USC § 885, to which he pleaded not guilty but guilty of the lesser offense of unauthorized absence. The only issue remaining for the court-martial’s consideration was the question of his intent, which was resolved against him. On this appeal several alleged errors in the law officer’s instructions and in the staff judge advocate’s post-trial review were assigned as grounds for reversal. In the view we take of the case, however, it is only necessary to consider the correctness of the law officer’s instruction that an intent on the part of the accused to remain absent permanently may be inferred from “evidence of a much prolonged absence without authority, for which there is no satisfactory explanation.” A similar in struction was held prejudicially ér-roneous in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. The same holding must result here.

The appellant’s conviction of desertion is set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review which may, in its discretion, approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my separate opinion in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287.
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14

- 0067

Focus Ready Draft 12/2/2013

ENGINEER: El

- Zoobi \ EVSAT (concerns) (11/ 15/2013):

Analogs:

. Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: PMN moderate; Deg Pdt rapid

PBT rating: P3B2T1 P3B1 (PMN); P3B2 (Degradation Pdt)

Health: 2 Drinking Water, No exposures needed for PMN; Drinking Water

for Degrad Prd

Eco: 1 No releases to waterOCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2

- 3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER.INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14

- 0067

Manufacturing

3M Cottage Grove Cottage Grove MN 55016

3M Decatur Decatur AL 35609 Number of Sites/ Location: 2INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14

- 0067

Processing:

Clariant Corporation

- New Hope, MN 55429

Standridge Color Corporation

- Social Circle, GA 30025

PolyOne Corporation

- Suwanee, GA 30024

Polyvel

- Hammonton, NJ 08037 Number of Sites/ Location: 4INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14

- 0067

Use:

Providencia USA, Inc.

- Statesville, NC 28625

PGI Nonwovens

- Mooresville, NC 28115

Kimberly

- Clark

- Roswell, GA 30076 Number of Sites/ Location: 3
#### John Schwab *v.*Frederic E. Cleveland.

— Motion granted for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals.
(Reap. Dec. 10501)

#### Patrick & Graves *v.*United States

Entry No. 5516-H, etc.

(Decided April 30, 1963)

*Stem & Shostalc (Majorie M. Shostalc*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General *(Sheila N. Ziff,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

JOHNSON, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement, consolidated at the trial, have been submitted upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> Miss Shostak: * * *

> Plaintiff accordingly offers to stipulate as to the Volkswagen automobiles itemized on the invoices accompanying the entries covered by the four appeals for reappraisement which we have consolidated, that on the date of exportation thereof to the United States, the market values or the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other *459costs, charges, and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoiced unit values, f.o.b. Hamburg, plus the total Americanization charges for all of the automobiles covered by each invoice, as stated on each invoice.

> Mes. Ziff *:*After conferring with the Appraiser and Assistant Appraiser at this port, we so agree.

> Judge Johnson : So agreed.

> Miss Shostak : All of the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement were entered subsequent to the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, that is after February 27,1958, and plaintiff further offers to stipulate that the merchandise covered by all of the entries and appeals for reappraisement the subject of these consolidated eases is included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, issued January 20, 1958, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress.

> Plaintiff further offers to stipulate that there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise on the dates of exportation involved herein.

> Mbs. Ziff : After conferring with the Appraiser and Assistant Appraiser, we so agree.

On tbe agreed facts, I find that export value, as that value is defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1980, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein and that such value is the invoiced unit values f.o.b. Hamburg, plus the total Americanization charges for all of the automobiles covered by each invoice, as stated on each invoice.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EX-31.2
        RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF ARTHUR DE JOYA

                 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Arthur De Joya, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of
GameZnFlix, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for
the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: January 7, 2005                 /s/ Arthur De Joya
                                       Arthur De Joya, CFO
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lorne Lilley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sunergy, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sunergy, Inc.



Date:  July 31, 2008

By:

/s/ Lorne Lilley

Lorne Lilley, Secretary, Treasurer and principal

accounting officer



---
#### HIRAM FINCH, Respondent, *v.*JONATHAN P. CARPENTER, Appellant.

*Practice*— *no appeal lies from a judgment entered by consent.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury.

The action was brought upon a promissory note given on account of the purchase-price of certain cattle sold to the defendant by the • plaintiff. The defense was a breach of warranty. A judgment recovered by the plaintiff upon a former trial had been set aside by the General Term and a new trial ordered.

The court at General Term said: “ The record shows that when the action was brought on for trial, it was agreed that the evidence should be read from the printed case on a former appeal, and that the plaintiff should take judgment for an amount specified.

“ A verdict was accordingly rendered for such amount and judgment thereon entered. It thus appears that the judgment was entered upon consent of the defendant. From a judgment so taken no appeal lies. *(Flake*v. *Van Wagenen,*54 N. Y., 25; *Innes*v. *Purcell,*58 id., 388.) ”

The appeal should be dismissed, with costs.

*E. T. Lovatt,*for the appellant.

*Wilson Brown, Jr.,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Cullen, J.

Present — Rabnard, P. J., and Culpen, J.; Dtkman, J., not sitting.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.
Stay Lifted; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 24 , 2024.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 24

- 00466

- CV

IN RE THE WU FAMILY TRUST, SSS VILLAGE AT SOUTHWEST , LLC,

WU PROPERTIES, INC., STEVE WU, SSS FONDR E N MARKETPLACE, LLC, CLOTO, LLC, SJY

- FORTUNEP, LLC, FONDR E N VILLAGE PLAZA, LLC, AND HLPW FONDR E N, LLC , Relator s

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 133rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022

- 60346



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On J une 26, 2024 , relator s The Wu Family Trust, SSS Village at Southwest , LLC, Wu Properties, Inc., Steve Wu, SSS Fondr e n Marketplace, LLC, Cloto, LLC,
SJY

- Fortunep, LLC, Fondr e n Village Plaza, LLC, and HLPW Fondr e n, LLC filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221;2 see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator s ask this Court to compel the Honorable Jaclanel McFarland, presiding judge of the 133rd District Court of
Harris County , to rule on relators’ Rule 91a Motion to Dismiss filed on March 25,
2024. We granted a temporary stay of discovery in the underlying proceeding on June 27, 2024. On July 23, 2024, counsel for relator s advised th is Court by letter that respondent ruled on relators’ Rule 91a motion to dismiss thereby mooting this original proceeding.
A petition for a writ of mandamus for failure to rule is dismissed as moot when the trial court rules after the petition for writ of mandamus is filed. See In re 4KBC Trucking, LLC , No. 14

- 23

- 00675

- CV, 2023 WL 7141209, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 31, 2023, orig. proceeding). We dismiss relators ’ petition for writ of mandamus as moot. Our earlier stay order is lifted.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Energy Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10- KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
         and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

         April 13, 2004                             /s/ John R. Bailey
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                      John R. Bailey
                                          President, Chief Operating Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(b)



TXU ENERGY COMPANY LLC

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CFO



The undersigned, Kirk R. Oliver, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TXU Energy Company LLC (the Company), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed
this 12th day of May, 2005.



/s/ Kirk R. OliverName:

Kirk R. OliverTitle:

Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TXU Energy Company LLC and will be retained by TXU Energy Company LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

 Certification of Lamar Sinkfield, President, CEO of Silver
   Screen Studios, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as
  adopted pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
                           2002.)
I, Lamar Sinkfield, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ending on June 30, 2004  of Silver Screen
Studios, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant
is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90
days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to
the registrant's auditors:
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
of internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrant's internal controls; and
6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not
there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: August 14, 2004
By:/s/ Lamar Sinkfield
Lamar Sinkfield, President, acting CEO and a acting Director
May 13, 1958

No. 61954.

Suit 4913.

#### H. F. Keeler *v.*United States.

C. D. 1842 affirmed January 22, 1958. C. A. D. 675.