alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Donald Evans, CEO of Silver Screen Studios, Inc., pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.)

I, Donald Evans, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silver Screen
Studios, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 10, 2006
By:/s/ Donald Evans
   ----------------
Donald Evans, acting CEO and a acting Director
No. 49286.

#### Protests 64371-K, etc., of Asheville Mica Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tii.son, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 55354.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 164610-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
No. 58142.

protests 187950-K, etc. (New York).

#### Alexanders Dept. Stores, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of beaded bags the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56124, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### Henry C. Adams, App’lt, *v.*Richard J. Morrison, Public Adm’r, etc., Resp’t.

No papers.

Motion to amend remittitur denied; ten dollars costs.

See 22 N. Y. State Rep., 324.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE
QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-Q
TO BE FILED UNDER SECTIONS 13 AND 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, AS AMENDED I, Sherri W. Schugart, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hines Real Estate
Investment Trust, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. /s/ SHERRI W. SCHUGARTSherri W. SchugartChief Financial Officer
 Date: November 12, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.3



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCDP FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 3, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Gault, Jr. certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 15, 2005



By:

/s/ ROBERT K. GAULT, JR.Robert K. Gault, Jr. President (Principal Executive Officer)




28
����������	�����

�������������

���������

�������

������

�����	

����

������

�����

������

������

���������

������

������

������

���������	��������������������

�

� � � ����

��������������������������������������������������������� ��	������������

��������������������!�"����#����	���""$����������%��������

������������

���&����'�(�����

)�	#*���

���+�������,��-���������

���������	�������������������

��	���
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13


May 24, 2000

Dennis H. Nelson, President & CEO
The Buckle, Inc.
2407 West 24th Street
P.O. Box 1480
Kearney, NE  68848-1480

Dear Dennis:

Our bank is pleased to issue a credit facility in the total amount of
$15,000,000.00 to your Company effective on the expiration of the existing loan
commitment on May 31, 2000. The purpose of this loan commitment is to provide
your Company with the funds for your financing needs required for this operating
year, subject to the following terms and conditions:

         1)  An unsecured operating line of credit in the amount of
             $7,500,000.00 available for your use until the loan expiration date
             of May 31, 2001, at which time it will be subject to annual
             renewal, as has been the case in previous years.

         2)  An annual clean provision of the line of credit whereby your
             Company will rest the line with a zero balance for at least 60
             consecutive days during this line of credit commitment period.

         2)  The interest rate charged on the unsecured operating line of credit
             will be the National Prime Rate as published in the "Wall Street
             Journal" date of change. Interest will be billed and payable
             monthly on the unsecured line of credit.

         3)  A $7,500,000.00 irrevocable commercial letter of credit line.

         4)  The Company agrees to provide the bank with quarterly financial
             statements consisting of a balance sheet and income statement, as
             well as provide the bank with an annual fiscal year-end audited
             financial statement.

Congratulations on your Company's continued strong financial performance in both
growth and profitability. We appreciate this opportunity to be able to assist
your fine Company with this financing package in support of your growth
objectives. If the terms and conditions of this loan commitment are satisfactory
to you, please acknowledge your acceptance by signing the following
Acknowledgment and returning it to my attention in the postage-paid return
envelope I have provided for your convenience.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely yours,

LARRY L. JEPSON

Larry L. Jepson
Chairman & CEO

                                 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The Undersigned acknowledges and accepts this loan commitment with attendant
terms and conditions as stated, this 25th day of May, 2000.

THE BUCKLE, INC.

BY:  DENNIS NELSON, PRESIDENT & CEO                               May 25, 2000
   -----------------------------------                          ----------------
     Dennis Nelson, President & CEO                                  Date



                                       30
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8805 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide support to university 

law school programs that are designed to provide legal assistance to 

veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2024 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide 

support to university law school programs that are designed to provide legal assistance to veterans, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Legal Sup5 port Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8805 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUPPORT 

2 FOR UNIVERSITY LEGAL CLINICS THAT AS3 SIST VETERANS. 

4 (a) SUPPORT AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Vet5 erans Affairs may provide support to one or more univer6 sity law school programs that are designed to provide legal 

7 assistance to veterans. 

8 (b) ELIGIBLE PROGRAMS.—Programs of university 

9 law schools which may receive support under subsection 

10 (a) may include programs that assist veterans with— 

11 (1) representing veterans in appeals and pro12 ceedings before the Department of Veterans Affairs 

13 related to the appointment of fiduciaries; 

14 (2) filing and appealing claims for benefits 

15 under laws administered by the Secretary; and 

16 (3) such other civil, criminal, and family legal 

17 matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. 

18 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

19 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

20 $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 64252.

protest 59/8984 (Seattle).

#### B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In Abstract 62252, *supra,*it was held that 2-piece stock lumber, stipulated to be similar in all material respects to that the subject of *B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 52, C.D. 1903), was free of duty, as claimed, under paragraph 1803(1), Tariff Act of 1930, as sawed lumber not further manufactured than planed, tongued, and grooved, but was subject to an internal revenue tax of 75 cents per thousand feet, board measure, under section 3424(.a), Internal Revenue Code of 1939, or section 4551(1), Internal Revenue Code of 1954. At the trial herein, it was stipulated that, in the recapitulation on the invoice showing separate values for 1-piece and 2-piece stock, the values were transposed, the actual value of the 2-pieee stock ($555.60) being shown next to the words “1 Pc. stock” and the actual value of the 1-piece stock ($88.04) being shown next to the words “2 Pc. stock”; that, at the time the entry in question was originally 'liquidated for duty, the transposition of *492figures was noticed by tbe collector; and that the 2-piece stock was held dutiable as manufactures of wood at 16% percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, as modified, with a value of $555.60. On the record presented, the collector was directed to re-reliquidate the entry on the basis of the correct value of said 2-piece stock, i.e., $555.60.
EE-RM/STD-94-403 ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS TEST PROCEDURE FORCLOTHES WASHERS LIST #216AA MISSING FROM FILE
#### TOWNSHIP OF BRICK *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WILLIAM SPIVAK *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Argued June 12, 1967

Decided June 12, 1967.

*Mr. Harold A. Schuman*argued the cause for the appellants *(Messrs. Haines, Schuman & Butz,*attorneys).

*Mr. Ellsworth J. Sterner*argued the cause for the respondent.

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in the majority opinion. Appellants’ position depends upon the hypothesis that the Legislature in fact intended that a majority vote for three candidates shall result in the election of the next four candidates as well. We cannot be sure the Legislature so intended. We see no substantial constitutional issue.

No costs.

*Eor*affirmance—Chief Justice Weinteatjb and Justices Jacobs, Fbancis, Peootoe, Hall, Schettino and Hare-*man—7.*

*For*reversal—None.
#### Lincoln Gessinger, an infant, by E. W. Hittle, his next friend, v. B. H. Kaster and Mrs. B. H. Kaster, *et vir.*

176 So. 842.

Division A.

Opinion Filed October 14, 1937.

Rehearing Denied November 27, 1937.

*Carey & Harrison,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Shackleford, Ivy, Farrior & Shannon,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

Thew rit of error brings for review judgment on directed verdict in a suit to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted on plaintiff by reason of a collision occurring between a bicycle on which plaintiff was riding, and the automobile which defendant, Mrs. B. H. Kaster, was driving.

After a careful consideration of the evidence in the case, we hold that there was sufficient evidence for the case to go to the jury upon the issues made by the pleadings and that the court committed error in assuming to take the case from the jury and direct a verdict.

Therefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

So ordered.

*611. Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Búford, J J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Exhibit 32.01
                              CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Pacult, chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
White Oak Financial Services, Inc., the general partner of Providence Select
Fund, Limited Partnership (the "Fund" or the "Registrant"), does hereby
certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

  (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

  (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

  (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

  (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



By: /s/  Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult



Date: May 15, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0572

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JAMES LOWELL MYRAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until May 15, 2023, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 13 2023

04/13/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0572
Exhibit 31.1





Certification of Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)











I, Ryan C. Farris, certify that:





1I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Master Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and HSBC Bank USA, National Association.





Date: March 29, 2013





/s/ Ryan C. Farris





Ryan C. Farris


President, Ally Wholesale Enterprises LLC, as Depositor


(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)





























1
(Reap. Dec. 8749)

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 74435, etc.

*600(Decided February 14, 1957)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the foEowing stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the .United States, Defendant, that the reappraisement appeals listed in the attached Schedule A, which Schedule A is made a part of this stipulation, are limited to the binoculars and leather cases and straps specified in the said attached Schedule A.

> That at the time of exportation binoculars and leather cases and straps such as or similar to those identified in the attached Schedule A, were being freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country *from*which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States at the per piece prices specified in the attached Schedule A net packed, which prices were higher than the foreign values as defined in Section 402 (c), Tariff Act of 1930.

> The reappraisement appeals listed in the attached Schedule A are submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is definéd in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the binoculars, leather cases, and straps specified in said schedule *“A,”*and that such values were the per piece prices specified in said schedule “A,” net, packed.

Insofar as the appeals relate to aE other merchandise, they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment wEl be entered accordingly.