alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10515)

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 6734, etc.

(Decided May 16, 1963)

*Stein & ShostaJc*for the plaintiff.

*John*TV. *Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise marked “V” and initialed FH by Franklin Hennigan on the invoices accompanying the entries covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases, which is incorporated herein, that, on the dates of exportation thereof to the United States, the market values or the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the ex factory invoiced unit values, net packed.

> That all the merchandise covered by all of the appeals for reappraisement the subject of this stipulation was entered subsequent to February 27, 1958.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that as to any of the merchandise on the invoices covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Gases which is included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, 93 Cust. Ct. [sic] 14, issued January 20, 1958 as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress that there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise on the dates of exportation involved herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value for the merchandise covered by the *475involved appeals was in each, case the ex-factory invoiced unit value, net, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2012 (the “Report”) of TICC Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/ s / Patrick
F. Conroy                                | 
|------------------------------------------------------ | 
|                                                       | 
|Name: Patrick F. Conroy
        Date: November 9, 2012 |
# Btateof 

# %ou@Carolina

NIKKI R. HALEY

GOVERNOR 1205 PENDLETON STREET COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA 29201 February 9,2011
The Honorable Lisa P. Jackson Administrator U.S.Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, 

### DC 20460
Dear Administrator Jackson,

It has cometo my attention that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may
soonissue arevised rulemaking governing cooling water intake structures at existing electric generation and manufacturing facilities. 

### I understand that one regulatory option EPA may pursue is to mandate that all or some subset of existing facilities be retrofitted with closed-cycle cooling systems. As the Governor of South Carolina, 

### I have serious concerns with this one-size-fits-all approach, and 

### I urge you instead to establish a national regulation that allows for state flexibility through the use oftechnological alternatives and site-specific and cost-benefit analyses.

As you know, the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires coolingwater intake structures at power plants 

### and manufacturing facilities to reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact. For more than 30 years, EPA and the states have worked together to applythis requirement on a site-by-sitebasis, examining the impacts of cooling water intakes on the specific aquatic environment.

I assure you that the permit writers in South Carolina have significant experiencein minimizing the adverse environmental impacts that maybe associated with coolingwater intake structures at power plants and manufacturing facilities, as well as in making sound decisions that support our aquatic ecosystems. 

### I am concerned that anew mandate from 

### EPA would waste state resources by requiring our regulatory officials to revise existing permits that already protect the environment-at a time when we aremaking every effort possible to restore economic growth and lower the burden ofgovernment.

In 2009, the 

### U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that the CWA allows for consideration of costs and benefits, both in setting national performance standards for cooling water intake structures and in issuing variances from those national standards through the use of site-specific considerations to ensure protection of the environment. This type of cost-benefit analysis is common in the area of environmental regulation. South Carolina supports efforts to protect the quality ofour waters, and 

### I believe the current regulatory regime has been effective in doing so.
Given the critical role of steam electric generation in meeting the nation's need for electricity, 

### I urge the EPA to avoid imposing a new national mandate that could seriously impact electricity supply, reliability, and affordability for the residential, business, and industrial customers in my state and across the United States.
Thank you for your personal attention to this important matter

cc: TheHonorable Cass 

### R. Sunstein TheHonorable Dr. Steven Chu Mr.Bill Daley, White House Chief of Staff Mr. Jacob J. Lew, Director, Office ofManagement and Budget
#### Marshall F. Sprenger, *Respondent, v.*The Poughkeepsie Gas Light Company, *Appellant.*

— Judgment and order denying new trial reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that,
to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                        |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ William L. Hedgepeth II          
|                        |  |     |  | William L. Hedgepeth II              
|                        |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Alltransport Inc. et al. *v.*United States

No. 7328.

Invoices dated London, England, October 1945, etc.

Certified November 9, 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 3, 1945, etc.

Entry No. 724867-1, etc.

(Decided July 9, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley 8. King*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Protect Pharmaceutical Corporation (the “Company”) on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoff Williams, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/   GEOFF WILLIAMS Geoff Williams Chief Executive Officer Acting Principal Accounting Officer  June 2, 2016 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K/A solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K/A or as a separate disclosure document.
Gobierno de Puerto Rico 

Municipio Autonomo de Ponce 

CIUDAD SENORIAL 

Hon M3r!':i 'Mdyita' hlew* ; AJleri 

Dc5T^OST- TO^- (^g^^L 

February 14,2011 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE 

WASHINGTON, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Homan: 

By email to: kevin.adamsfBdot.Kov 

CD O C D ^ 

RE: EAS Request for Proposal at Mayaguez, Expiration at Ponce 

This is in reference to the determination for not order requesting proposals at Ponce, to provided Essential Air 

Service (EAS). 

The Ponce Community needs and is entitled to reliable uninterrupted air service. The service currently provided 

by Jet Blue does not serve a steady population of users between San Juan and the Virgin Island. Cape Air offers 

flights and connections that Jet Blue does not. Additional, with the departure of Cape Air, there will not be any 

flights to San Juan. In case of an emergency in Route 52, the population will not have a fast and secure route for 

arriving in San Juan. The South Region of Puerto Rico composed for 15 municipalities with 604,195 habitants 

in the total of the region. 

Cape Air provided an invaluable service to people employed in the Virgin Island who use Ponce as the major 

airport. Considering the negative impact that, Cape Air departure will have at this time in the overall economic 

strategic development in our region. Please, review your determination, we believe that it is extremely 

important for the future economic and social development of Ponce that Cape Air continued offering the EAS in 

the city. 

If you have any question about this letter, please contact the Autonomous Municipality of Ponce for additional 

information at (787) 284-4141 extension 2229 or 2183. 

Cordially, 

M^RIA E. MEL' 

MAYOR 

MD ^ ^ 

^^?^&*^u i a» tS<&vi:3Sn'^ iy ^ 

PO BOX 331709 Ponce, Puerto Rico 00733-1709 Tel6fono (787)2844141 * www.visitponce.com
#### LOS ANGELES BRANCH NAACP, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 81-5772.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 16, 1984.

G. William Shea, Peter W. James, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

*1258Thomas I. Atkins, Gen. Counsel, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendants-appellants.

(Opinion Sept. 1, 1988, 9 Cir., 1983, 714 F.2d 935)

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Norcross Safety Products L.L.C. (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David F. Myers, Jr., Chief FinancialOfficer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(3)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(4)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated:  May 11, 2004 | By:    | /s/ David F.  Myers, Jr.                           |   |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | David F. Myers, Jr.                                |
|                      |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                      |   | Secretary and Manager                              |
|                      |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)       |

 

 

**A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and willbe retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
Case No. 7,979.

#### In re LADY BRYAN MIN. CO.

District Court, D. Nevada.

Sept., 1870.

[See Case No. 7,978.]
EXHIBIT 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Go Green Directories, Inc.    (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A-1 for the period ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  3.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.     Date:   March 1, 2012   By: /s/Rachael Hodyno ----------------- Rachael Hodyno Chief Financial  Officer
Before the Second Division,

August 5, 1941

No. 46231.

#### Protests 646230-G, etc., of Barker Bros. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as**

**Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Dated: March 3, 2014 

 

Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, thiscertification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[House Report 108-11]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

108th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     108-11

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY, AND 
  PROVIDING FOR CORRECTIONS IN THE ENROLLMENT OF, H.J. RES. 2, MAKING 
       FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2003

                                _______
                                

  February 13 (legislative day, February 12), 2003.--Referred to the 
                House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 71]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 71, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution by 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.J. Res. 2, Making Further 
Continuing Appropriations for the Fiscal Year 2003, and against 
its consideration. The rule provides that the conference report 
shall be considered as read. The rule further provides that 
upon adoption of the conference report the House shall be 
considered to have adopted H. Con. Res. 35.
    The waiver of all points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration includes a wavier of 
clause 8(a) of Rule XXII (requiring a three-day layover of any 
conference report). The waiver of clause 8(a) of Rule XXII is 
needed because the conference report became available on the 
legislative day of February 12, 2003 and may be considered by 
the House as early as February 13, 2003.

                                

```
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2010-1 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby
certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 26, 2010, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables
LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2010-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period
that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2013By:

/s/ Mark McCastlainName:

Mark McCastlainTitle:

Senior Vice President and TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2013
No. 64235.

protest 59/28997 (New York).

#### Seaboard Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid flowers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59302, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that,
to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lisa F. Campbell                             
|                      |  |     |  | Lisa F. Campbell                                 
|                      |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer