alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6165]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5125-N-14]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: March 29, 2007.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. E7-6165 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
#### ANTHONY LAURA, APPELLANT, v. LOUIS PUNCERELLI AND THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HUDSON COUNTY, RESPONDENTS.

Submitted July 8, 1918

Decided October 11, 1918.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 91 *N. J. L.*38.

For the appellant, *De Graw & Murray.*

For the respondents, *John H. Platoff*and *Francis H. McCauley.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, sJJ. 11.

*For reversal*— White, J. 1.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8781 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8781

To prohibit the implementation of the Proposed Resource Management Plan 
  Amendment and Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for 
Federal coal managed by the Buffalo, Wyoming Field Office of the Bureau 
                          of Land Management.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2024

 Ms. Hageman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the implementation of the Proposed Resource Management Plan 
  Amendment and Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for 
Federal coal managed by the Buffalo, Wyoming Field Office of the Bureau 
                          of Land Management.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON PROPOSED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 
              AND FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR 
              FEDERAL COAL MANAGED BY BUFFALO, WYOMING FIELD OFFICE OF 
              BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT.

    The Secretary of the Interior may not finalize, implement, 
administer, or enforce the Proposed Resource Management Plan Amendment 
or Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Federal coal 
managed by the Buffalo, Wyoming Field Office of the Bureau of Land 
Management referred to in the notice of availability published by the 
Bureau of Land Management titled ``Notice of Availability of the 
Proposed Resource Management Plan Amendment and Final Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Buffalo Field Office, Wyoming'' 
(89 Fed. Reg. 43431; published May 17, 2024).
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Davis, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 506]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), rendered June 28, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree, and reckless driving, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*654Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying two of his challenges to prospective jurors for cause. " 'The determination as to whether a prospective juror can provide reasonable jury service in a given case is left largely to the discretion of the trial court, which can question and observe the prospective juror during voir dire’ ” *(People v Toval,*216 AD2d 500, 501; *People v Campbell,*216 AD2d 482; *People v Pagan,*191 AD2d 651, 652; *see also, People v Holder,*204 AD2d 482). The record reveals that neither prospective juror possessed a state of mind which would have precluded the defendant from receiving a fair trial *(see,*CPL 270.20).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

September 6, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00475

- CV

IN RE G.E.T.,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- PA

- 00671 The Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal o f the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on September 3, 2019. On September 3, 2019, appellant filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief.

The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Accordingly, this appeal is required to be brou ght to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed. Id

. The motion is GRANTED, and appellant’s brief must be filed no later than September 2 3, 2019. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of September, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
(Reap. Dec. 8735)

#### United States *v.*Air Express International Agency, Inc., for a/c Herman L. Atlas

Entry No. 980968.

(Decided January 17, 1957)

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

*Joseph C. Santarelli*for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the involved leather shoes, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, at the invoiced unit values, less 3%, less cost of insurance and consular fee, packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value, as defined in Section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this reappraisement appeal is submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the invoiced unit values, less 3 per centum, less cost of insurance and consular fee, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
**Exhibit 15.1**

 
|  |  |
|--|--|

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-195020) and on Form F-3 (No. 333-204586) of Nord Anglia Education, Inc. of our report dated 29 November 2016 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 20-F.

 

**/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers** Hong Kong, 29 November 2016

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers,22/F Prince’s Building, Central Hong Kong*

*T: +852 2289 8888, F: +852 2810 9888, www.pwchk.com*

 

----
#### In the Matter of the Central Trust Company.

Application denied, on the ground that the rules should be modified by the convention of justices.
Exhibit 32.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Frontier Long/Short
Commodity Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                  
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                                    
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                     
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                         
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 12, 2009
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highland Hospitality Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James L. Francis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

 

Date: November 8, 2005
----

EXHIBIT 31.1 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Anthony D.J. Ker, Chief Executive Officer of Gryphon GoldCorporation, certify that: 

1.        Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB/A of Gryphon Gold Corporation; 
2.         Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3.         Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.         The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

(a)       designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared; 

(b)       evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

(c)       disclosed in this reportany change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registration’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;and 

5.         The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a)       all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

(b)       any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: December 19, 2007 
 By:   /s/ Anthony D.J. Ker                   Anthony D.J. Ker             Chief Executive    Officer
(Reap. Dec. 9286)

#### Calvine Mills, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 778873.

(Decided December 29, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

It is provided by the rules of the court that, in such an instance, after the opposite party has had an opportunity to present evidence on the issues, the case may be decided by the court on the record before it.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the present appeal for a reappraisement and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Guoshen Tu, the Chief Executive Officer of
CHINA SECURITY & SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY that:

| | 1. | The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report"), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      the Company.                                                         

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 26th day of April 2010.

/s/ Guoshen
TuGuoshen Tu Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc. and
will be retained by China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
#### PATRICK CRANE, APPELLANT, v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Submitted March 25, 1918

Decided May 3, 1918.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 90 N. *J. L.*109.

For the appellant, *Ziegener & Lane.*

For the respondent, *John Milton*and *John Benton.*

*249Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

*For reversal*— None.
#### Ruth Torbett, Resp’t, *v.*Sherburne B. Eaton, App’lt.

Motion to dismiss denied. *Mem.*
Exhibit 35.2

Servicer Compliance Statement

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Navient Solutions, Inc., the Administrator and Servicer for the Student Loan Corporation Trusts1 (the Trusts), does hereby certify that:

(a) This certificate is delivered
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB;

(b) A review of the servicing activities of the Servicer and the Administrator as of
December 31, 2014 and for the period January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period) and their performance under the applicable servicing and administration agreements for each of the Trusts has been made under my
supervision; and

(c) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer and Administrator have fulfilled all of their
obligations under the servicing and administration agreements for the Trusts in all material respects through the Reporting Period.

[Signature Page Follows]



|1 | SLC Student Loan Trust 2004-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-3, SLC Student Loan Trust 2006-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2006-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2007-1,
SLC Student Loan Trust 2007-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2008-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2008-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2009-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2009-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2009-3, and SLC Student Loan Trust 2010-1.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|March 30, 2015                        
|                                      
|/s/ MICHAEL MAIER                     
|Michael Maier                         
|Senior Vice President, Loan Operations
|Navient Solutions, Inc.               

Servicer Compliance Statement