alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of G2 Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the six month period ending
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2010 (the Report), I, Gust Kepler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Gust Kepler        
|Gust Kepler            
|Chief Executive Officer
|July 26, 2010          

A signed original of this certification
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AFS-11-282-E June 30, 2011 Exemption No. 10306 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0421

Mr. James Nides SOC Project Manager Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc.

17445 JFK Boulevard Houston, TX 77302

Dear Mr. Nides:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 19, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc.(A SA), for an exemption from § 121.163(a), (b), and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow ASA to combine its operating certificate with ExpressJet Airlines’ (ExpressJet) operating certificate without completing aircraft proving tests as prescribed by § 121.163.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ASA.

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 10254 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that the petitioner’s request for relief from § 121.163(a), (b), and (c) had not shown how an equivalent level of safety would be provided if proving runs were not conducted. The FAA was unable to verify the petitioner’s statement regarding grants of exemption to the other carriers in those merger situations cited and could find no evidence that any similar exemptions were granted to these carriers in past mergers.2

The FAA agreed that this merger was being performed under Operations Specification A502. Section one of the Operations Specification states, “Inherent in the implementation of the United-Continental Bridging Manual and Transition Plan was the air carriers’ responsibility to ensure regulatory compliance and provide the public with the highest possible level of safety in air transportation.” Reducing the pr oving flights without any approved plan did not provide the public with the highest possible level of safety in air transportation and was, therefore, not in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 10254;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 10254 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Adm inistrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc., for an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.163.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
IB 

Union Calendar No. 610 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8446 

[Report No. 118–723] 

To amend the Energy Act of 2020 to include critical materials in the 

definition of critical mineral, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2024 

Mr. CISCOMANI (for himself, Mr. NEWHOUSE, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

NOVEMBER 1, 2024 

Additional sponsors: Mr. BIGGS, Mrs. LESKO, and Mr. CURTIS

NOVEMBER 1, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 17, 2024] 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8446 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Act of 2020 to include critical materials in the definition of critical mineral, and for other 

purposes. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8446 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Critical Mineral Con5 sistency Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CRITICAL MATERIALS INCLUDED AS CRITICAL MIN7 ERALS. 

8 Section 7002 of the Energy Act of 2020 (30 U.S.C. 

9 1606) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)(3)(A), to read as follows: 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘critical min12 eral’ means— 

13 ‘‘(i) any mineral, element, substance, 

14 or material designated as critical by the 

15 Secretary under subsection (c); and 

16 ‘‘(ii) a critical material as determined 

17 by the Secretary of Energy under para18 graph (2)(A).’’; and 

19 (2) in subsection (c)(5), by adding at the end the 

20 following: 

21 ‘‘(C) INCLUSION OF CRITICAL MATERIALS.— 

22 Not later than 45 days after the date on which 

23 the Secretary of Energy determines a non-fuel 

24 mineral, element, substance, or material to be a 

25 critical material under subsection (a)(2)(A), the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 8446 RH

1 Secretary shall update the list of critical min2 erals published under paragraph (3) to include 

3 such critical material.’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 610 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8446 

[Report No. 118–723] 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Act of 2020 to include critand for other purposes. ical materials in the definition of critical mineral, 

NOVEMBER 1, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

 Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
                            2002
The undersigned, Lamar Sinkfield, President and CEO of
Silver Screen Studios, Inc., a Georgia corporation, hereby
makes the following certification as required by Section
906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to
the following of this quarterly report filed pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2003.
The undersigned certifies that the above periodic report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of Silver Screen Studios,
Inc. and results of its operations.
By:/s/ Lamar Sinkfield
Lamar Sinkfield, President,  acting CEO and an acting
Director
November 28, 2003
Before the Third Division,

August 4, 1943

No. 48618.

#### Protests 63259-K, etc., of J. Ossola Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel an allowance of 2)4 percent was made on cheese similar to the Romano and Provolone cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), and an allowance of 1 percent on certain cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese also involved in that case. Protests sustained to that extent.
November 8, 2015 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System ❑ 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Attached please find Corliss Resources, Inc.'s request for an exemption from the listed 

Federal Aviation Regulations to allow commercial operation of its Small Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems ("sUASs") for aerial imaging for safety and monitoring of secured and 

controlled job sites. This exemption request is exclusively for the use of the UAS 

manufactured by Kespry, Inc., a Menlo Park based company. 

Also attached to this letter is the Kespry UAS Flight Manual, which outlines the 

operating requirements, limitations, and technical specifications for the Kespry system. 

CSDS has reviewed this Manual and has found it to be acceptable for sUAS operations 

on its secure project sites. CSDS submits this manual as a Confidential document under 

14 CFR 11.35 (b) as the entire manual contains proprietary information that the applicant 

has not and will not share with others. The Manual contains operating conditions and 

procedures that are not available to the public and are protected from release under the 

Freedom of Information Act 5 USC 552 et. seq. 

Thank you for your time and consideration, and please let me know if you have any 

questions. 

Sincerely, 

Steve Corliss 

Corliss Resources, Inc. 

Gabriel Dobbs 

Kespry, Inc.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
DECEMBER 31, 2002 (the "Report") of UTEK CORPORATION (the "Registrant"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
CLIFFORD M. GROSS, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



                                              /s/ Clifford M. Gross
                                              ------------------------
                                              Name:  Clifford M. Gross
                                              Date:  March 28, 2003

         This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Kim Wayne Burden

No. 06

- 20

- 00111

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Stevens

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating

.

As sta ted in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED OCTOBER 2 9 , 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual
Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 5, 2010 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the
formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2010-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial
Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS Sensub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from May 5, 2010 through December 31,
2010, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my
knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                 |  | 
|                                     |  |                                 | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ James Fehleison             |  |  |  | Dated: March 28, 2011
|                                     |  | James Fehleison                 |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****RD&T: organizationaldirectory.**
 
2001 | 2002| 2005 | 2006| 2009
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30/21:
Item Number:0982-G-61
CGP systemNumber:000533800
 
February 6, 2020
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Synergy  Financial  Group,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
we,  John S.  Fiore,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and A.  Richard
Abrahamian, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>

/s/John S. Fiore                                /s/A. Richard Abrahamian
-------------------------------------           -------------------------------------------------
John S. Fiore                                   A. Richard Abrahamian
President and Chief Executive Officer           Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: August 9, 2007                            Date: August 9, 2007

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCDP FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 2, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K.
Gault Jr. certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 16, 2006



By:

/s/ ROBERT K. GAULT JR.Robert K. Gault Jr.Principal Executive Officer
No. 51073.

#### Protests 35869-K, etc., of Bloomingdale Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of puree cups the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Johnson Bros.*v. *United Stales*(15 Cust. Ct. 113, C. D. 955). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
No. 61933.

#### Mondial Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 318883-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sprats in oil, packed in tins, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnold Sorensin Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### IMPERIAL WOOLEN CO. v. MILLER et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

November 28, 1910.)

No. 1,398 (23).

Master and Servant (§ 284*) — Action for Injury to Servant — Evidence.

Evidence in an action for an injury to a servant *hold*sufficient to require the submission of the case to the jury.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Master and Servant, Dec. Dig. § 284.*J

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Action at law by George Miller, by his father and next friend, Adam Miller, and Adam Miller, against the Imperial Woolen Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

Joseph H. Taulane, Charles S. Schofield, and White, White & Tau-lane, for plaintiff in error.

James H. Simms, for defendants in error.

Before BUEEINGTON and LANNING, Circuit Judges, and CROSS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error says that three questions are presented by the assignments of error: (1) Whether the minor, George Miller, was directed to oil the machinery while it was in motion; (2) whether he was adequately instructed; and (3) whether he was furnished with unsafe tools and appliances. This is a fair statement of the questions involved. There was abundant evidence on each of them to oblige the court to submit the case to the jury.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed, with costs.
No. 50145.

#### Protest 956034-G of Oviatt Importing Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Bkwall, J.

The court adhered to its original decision and judgment rendered heretofore will stand.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Frank Garcia, Chief Financial Officer, of Pan
American Lithium Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 20-F of Pan American Lithium
      Corp. for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2011 (the Report) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Pan American Lithium Corp.                                                                      

Dated: August 31, 2011



| | /s/ Frank Garcia                                                    
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Frank Garcia                                                        
| | Chief Financial Officer                                             
| | Pan American Lithium Corp.                                          
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pan American
Lithium Corp. and will be retained by Pan American Lithium Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
September 13, 2010 

Mr. David C. Warren 

2201 Gleghorn 

West Plains, MO 65775 

Dear Mr. Warren: 

This is in response to your October 20, 2006 letter (public docket No. FAA-2006-25494) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for reconsideration of your request for 

relief from § 65.91(c)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). An exemption, if 

granted, would have enabled you to be eligible for an Inspection Authorization (IA) without 

being actively engaged in maintaining aircraft for at least the two years before application. 

You originally petitioned for exemption on July 21, 2006 and the FAA denied your request. 

In Denial of Exemption No. 8771, the FAA referenced two other denials of exemption from 

§ 65.91(c)(2) and determined that your circumstances were similar in all material respects to 

those in the denials. We further emphasized that the relevant issue leading to our decision 

was not the overall maintenance experience, but rather the two consecutive years of 

maintenance experience required to be eligible for renewal of your IA. 

With more than two consecutive years of maintenance experience, you should now be able to 

apply for an IA. As such, an exemption is not longer needed. We will take no further action 

on your petition for reconsideration. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service