alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that,
to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ William L. Hedgepeth II          
|                   |  |     |  | William L. Hedgepeth II              
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 41868.

#### Protest 223600-G of American Express Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of laces similar to those involved in *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8841 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8841

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 114 Center Street East in Roseau, Minnesota, as the ``Floyd B. Olson 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLOYD B. OLSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 114 Center Street East in Roseau, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Floyd B. Olson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Floyd B. 
Olson Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### IN THE MATTER OF FRANK L. JOHNSON, JR., AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

Argued March 7, 1967

Decided March 27, 1967.

*Mr. Henry P. Megargee, Jr.,*for the order.

Uo appearance for respondent.

*111The opinion of the court was delivered

Per' Curiam.

The respondent was heretofore suspended for one year upon charges involving the diversion to his own use of moneys entrusted to him. *In re Johnson,*36 *N. J.*535 (1962). After his reinstatement respondent again converted trust funds. He does not question his guilt. In fact he offered to resign with prejudice under *R. R.*1:18A. Although such a resignation is “equivalent to disbarment,” as the cited rule expressly provides, we rejected the resignation as inappropriate in these circumstances. Respondent should be and he is disbarred.

*For disbarment*—■ Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Scilettino and Hake-man — 7.

*Opposed*— Hone.
**Exhibit 32.2**

#### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Norcross Safety Products L.L.C. (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2006, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David F. Myers, Jr., Chief FinancialOfficer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| Dated:  August 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/ DAVID F. MYERS, JR.                             |   |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | David F. Myers, Jr.                                 |
|                         |   | Executive Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                         |   | Secretary and Manager                               |
|                         |   | (Principal Financial  and Accounting Officer)       |

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

----
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10096.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10096.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation (the Company) for
the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth Klipper, Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                              
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 16, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ KENNETH KLIPPER                          
|                    |  |  |  | Kenneth Klipper                              
|                    |  |  |  | Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The First Marblehead Corporation and will be retained by The First Marblehead Corporation and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:11-cr-138

Sylvester Wright 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 20) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: August 29, 2011 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cr-00138-JLG-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 08/29/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8905 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study 

and submit to Congress a report on neonatal abstinence syndrome, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2024 

Mrs. RODGERS of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

conduct a study and submit to Congress a report on 

neonatal abstinence syndrome, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maddie’s Infant Recov5 ery And Children’s Legislative Emergency Act of 2024’’ 

6 or the ‘‘MIRACLE Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8905 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT ON NEONATAL ABSTINENCE 

2 SYNDROME. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

4 Human Services (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Sec5 retary’’), shall conduct a study on— 

6 (1) the prevalence of neonatal abstinence syn7 drome (in this section referred to as ‘‘NAS’’); and 

8 (2) infant and maternal health outcomes associ9 ated with pediatric transitional care facilities. 

10 (b) ELEMENTS.—In conducting the study under sub11 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

12 (1) identify the barriers to obtaining valid, ac13 curate, up-to-date data on the prevalence of NAS 

14 among beneficiaries under State plans (or waivers of 

15 such plans) under title XIX of the Social Security 

16 Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.); and 

17 (2) identify the scope of services and supports 

18 available to beneficiaries with a diagnosis of NAS 

19 under such State plans (or waivers). 

20 (c) REPORT.— 

21 (1) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 

22 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 

23 Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that 

24 contains the findings and, to the extent applicable, 

25 recommendations resulting from the study under 

26 subsection (a). 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8905 IH

1 (2) PUBLICATION.—Upon the submission to 

2 Congress of the report described in paragraph (1), 

3 the Secretary shall publish such report on a public 

4 website. 

5 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

6 (1) PEDIATRIC TRANSITIONAL CARE FACIL7 ITY.—The term ‘‘pediatric transitional care facility’’ 

8 means a residential pediatric recovery center for in9 fants with neonatal abstinence syndrome that pro10 vides inpatient or outpatient treatment. 

11 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means each of 

12 the several States, the District of Columbia, and any 

13 territory of the United States. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the Form 10-Q filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Lisa F. Campbell                                    
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Lisa F. Campbell                                        
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Operating Officer
November 8, 1948

No. 52677.

#### Stan Newcomb and Barbara Todd *v.*United States,

Petitioners’ application for rehearing denied.
(Reap. Dec. 10191)

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., a/c Leo J. Meyberg Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 13055, etc.

(Decided March 6, 1962)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiffs.

*William H. Orriolc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise which is the subject of the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of phonograph records exported from Mexico after July 1, 1959.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that phonograph records are not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and are subject to appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the prices shown on Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for reap-praisement listed in Schedule B are hereby submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed, facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is statutory export value and that such statutory value therefor is the prices set forth in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, for each of the items enumerated therein, with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### George G. Havens *v.*Benjamin A. Willis.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Brady, J.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v RONALD L. BOSTIC, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

15 USCMA 409, 35 CMR 381

No. 18,291

May 28, 1965

*Colonel Joseph L. Chalk, Major George O. Taylor, Jr.,*and *Captain Robert T. Webster*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel Edwin G- S> chuck, Lieutenant Colonel Francis M. Cooper, Captain*
      *410
      *Joseph H. Crosby,*and *First Lieutenant Frank J. Penna*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Subsequent to this Court’s order of February 5, 1965, denying accused’s petition for grant of review of the decision of the board of review regarding his conviction by general court-martial, accused petitioned for reconsideration, citing United States v Gallagher, 15 USCMA 391, 35 CMR 363, which was then pending before the Court. Our decision in that case is dispositive.

The petition for reconsideration, accordingly, is denied.
#### United Mercantile & Shipping Co. *v.*United States

No. 7505.

Entry Nos. 1334; 1527.

Pro forma invoice dated Port au Prince, Haiti, April 26, 1943, etc.

Entered at San Juan, P. R., May 18, 1943, etc.

(Decided January 14, 1948)

No appearance for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When these appeals for reappraisement were called for'hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the appealing party, and counsel for the United States moved for a dismissal of the action. This motion is denied and exception allowed to the moving party.

Under rule 6 of this court, where there is no appearance in a case when it is called “it shall be deemed submitted, and shall be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.”

I have examined the records in these appeals and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I, therefore, find that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION

ROSEVELT GREEN, 

Petitioner, CASE NO. 2:10-CV-1053

JUDGE SMITH

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ABEL

WARDEN, NOBLE 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 

Respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

On December 6, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be

dismissed. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. 

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby

DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 \s\ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH

United States District Judge

Case: 2:10-cv-01053-GCS-MRA Doc #: 10 Filed: 01/06/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00050-CR

Beatrice Christine Castillo

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19FC-2229G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 3, 2020
Before the Third Division,

April 28, 1945

No. 50150.

#### Protest 944081-G (S) of Chan Kee Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) certain of the items were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 and other items were held dutiable at 10-percent under paragraph 34 as claimed. The protest was sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY
DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the report of Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 13, 2011



By:

/s/ John R. SproulsJohn R. Sprouls Principal Executive Officer
#### Tory B. Hopkins, Resp’t, v. The Niagara Machine Co., App’lt.

Appeal from municipal court. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Hatch, J., in *Brown*v. *Same defendant.*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synergy  Financial  Group,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John S. Fiore,  President,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/John S. Fiore
-------------------------------------------
John S. Fiore
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

Date: May 10, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6182]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,970]


TDS/US Automotive; Chesapeake, VA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 16, 2007 in response to a 
worker petition filed a company official on behalf of workers at TDS/US 
Automotive, Chesapeake, Virginia.
    The petitioner has withdrawn the petition. Thus, this investigation 
is terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of March 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-6182 Filed 4-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40406 

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WESLEY WILLIAM WALTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:94-CV-310

- - - - - - - - - -

February 7, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wesley William Walter appeals the district court's denial of

his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Walter's claim

regarding counsel's failure to file a notice of appeal is without

merit because Walter validly waived his right to appeal his

sentence. See United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 293 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 244 (1994). Walter's claim that

his plea agreement was vague and unenforceable because it failed to

specify that other criminal acts may be used against him at 
2

sentencing also is without merit. Any indication of such in the

plea agreement would have been purely speculative and thus properly

was not included in the agreement. We do not address for the first

time on appeal Walter's newly-raised argument concerning the

allegedly "false facts of jurisdiction" contained within the

indictment. See Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir.

1991). 

APPEAL DISMISSED.