alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99


                             TXU ENERGY COMPANY LLC
                    CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                             Twelve Months Ended
                                                                                                March 31, 2004
                                                                                                --------------
                                                                                             (millions of dollars)

<S>                                                                                                  <C>
Operating revenues........................................................................           $ 8,168

Operating expenses:
   Cost of energy sold and delivery fees..................................................             5,168
   Operating costs........................................................................               677
   Depreciation and amortization..........................................................               394
   Selling, general and administrative expenses...........................................               638
   Franchise and revenue-based taxes......................................................               122
   Other income...........................................................................               (41)
   Other deductions.......................................................................                40
   Interest income........................................................................                (8)
   Interest expense and related charges...................................................               325
                                                                                                     -------
     Total costs and expenses.............................................................             7,315
                                                                                                     -------

Income from continuing operations before income taxes.....................................               853

Income tax expense........................................................................               277
                                                                                                     -------

Income from continuing operations.........................................................               576

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit.....................................               (17)
                                                                                                     -------

Net income................................................................................           $   559
                                                                                                     =======

</TABLE>
#### THE BEE.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 9, 1911.)

No. 108.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Alexander & Ash (Peter Alexander, of counsel), for appellant. Harrington, Perkins & Englar (IT. S. Harrington, of counsel), for appellee.

Before LACOMBE, OOXE, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed, with interest and costs, on opinion of Judge Adams (173 Fed. 925).
1 Outlook	Entertainment	LLC 625	Forest	Ave Havertown,	PA	19083 Phone:	610
- 952
- 1776 E
- Mail: steve@otlk.com Web:	www.OTLK.com U.S.	Department	of	Transportation Docket	Management	System 1200	New	Jersey	Ave., SE	Washington,	DC	20590 

## UAV **specifications DJI**  **S1000 Aircraft	Information**  **Frame:** Diagonal	Wheelbase: 1045mm Frame	Arm	Length: 386mm Frame	Arm	Weight (Including	Motor,	Esc,	Propeller	): 325g Center	Frame	Diameter: 337.5mm Center	Frame	Weight	(With	Landing	Gear	Mounting	Base,	Servos) : 1330g Landing	Gear	Size: 460mm	(Length)	×511mm	(Width)	×305mm	(Height),	(Top width:	155	mm) **Motor:** Stator	Size: 41×14mm Kv:	400rpm/V Max	Power :	500W Weight(With	Cooling	Fan): 158g **Ecs:** Working	Current: 40A Working	Voltage :	6S	LiPo Signal	Frequency: 30Hz	~	450Hz Drive	Pwm	Frequency:	8KHz Weight(With	Radiators): 35g **Foldable	Propeller:** Material: High	strength	performance	engineered	plastics2

Size :	15×5.2inch Weight:	13g **Flight	Parameters:** Takeoff	Weight :	6.0Kg	~	11.0Kg Total	Weight :	4.2Kg Power	Battery: LiPo	(6S 、 10000mAh~20000mAh 、 15C(Min)) Max	Power	Consumption :	4000W Hover	Power	Consumption :	1500W	(@9.5Kg	Takeoff	Weight) Hover	Time :	15min	(@15000mAh	&	9.5Kg	Takeoff	Weight) Working	Environment	Temperature : - 10	°C	~	+40	°C S1000	User	Manual: http://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/s1000/en/S1000_User_Manual_v1.10_en.pdf **Flight	Controller:** 3DR	Pixhawk with	GPS Pixhalk	User	Manual: https://3dr.com/wp
- content/uploads/2014/03/pixhawk
- manual
- rev7.pdf **Flight	Control	RC:** Spektrum	AR9020	9
- Channel	DSMX/XPlus	Receiver Band:	2.4GHz User	Manual: http://www.spektrumrc.com/ProdInfo/Files/SPMAR9020
- Manual.pdf **Video	Link:** Amimon	Connex	HD	downlink

Distance	(Outdoor):	3,300ft	LOS Transmission	Delay:	Less	than	1mS Radio	Frequency:	5 .1
- 5.8	GHz Channel	Selection:	Automatic	frequency	selection	(AFS) Video	Formats:	1080p/60,	1080p/50,	1080i/60,	1080i/50, 1080p/30,	1080p25,1080p/24,	720p/60,	720p/50,	525i/60, 625i/50 Regulations:	CE,	FCC,	MIC 

## DJI	Phantom	3	Pro **Aircraft	Information** Aircraft	Specifications: http://www.dji.com/product/phantom
- 3
- pro/info#specs Aircraft	User	Manual: https://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_Us er_Manual__V1.6.pdf3



## DJI **Inspire	1 Aircraft	Information**  Aircraft	Specifications: http://www.dji.com/product/inspire
- 1/info#specs Aircraft	User	Manual: https://dl.djicdn. com/downloads/inspire_1/en/Inspire_1_User_Manual_en_v2 .0_1218.pdf
#### Rosemary Germano, Respondent, v Moses Friedman et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Raymond H. Germano, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 824]

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), entered March 21, 1994, which granted the joint motion of the plaintiff and the third-party defendant for (a) summary judgment on the complaint and to dismiss the defendants’ affirmative defenses and counterclaims, and (b) summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered April 5, 1994, which, *inter alia,*is in favor of the plaintiff and third-party defendant and against them awarding the plaintiff a judgment of foreclosure and dismissing the defendants’ affirmative defenses and counterclaims, and dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues, raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The contention of the defendants-buyers that there were triable issues of fact precluding summary judgment is unavailing. Here, even if the plaintiff-seller was aware that the property was a Federally-regulated wetland, the defendants’ allegations *502are insufficient to establish that the plaintiff had any legal duty existing outside of the contract so as to have required disclosure of this information to the defendants *(see, Stambovsky v Ackley,*169 AD2d 254, 257-258). Accordingly, the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment.

Moreover, the defendants’ counterclaim and the third-party complaint alleging fraud in the inducement were properly dismissed, since the specific disclaimer contained in the contract amendment defeated the defendants’ allegation that the agreement was executed in reliance upon contrary oral misrepresentations *(see, Citibank v Plapinger,*66 NY2d 90; *Danann Realty Corp. v Harris,*5 NY2d 317, 320-321; *Taormina v Hibsher,*215 AD2d 549; *Cohan v Sicular,*214 AD2d 637; *LaBarbera v Marino,*192 AD2d 697). Paragraph 16 of the contract amendment expressly provided that it was a specific disclaimer intended to preclude any later claim for misrepresentation, failure to disclose, or concealment, and that its provisions would survive the closing of title.

In any event, the defendants’ conclusory and unsubstantiated allegations of fraud in the inducement were inadequate to defeat the summary judgment motion *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Moreover, in view of our agreement with the Supreme Court’s conclusion, we need not address the merits of the parties’ remaining contentions. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:David Thompson / Tucson, AZ 85710 I am requesting exemption to FAA UAS Section 333 for the following reason: To use my drone for commercial building, apartment complex, and real estate photography purposes. The drone in which I will operate is manufactured by 'Yuneek' and is model # Q500 4K. It is FCC compliant, and I regularly practice flying the drone in UN-populated areas. The drone has 3 modes of control; manual, smart, and home modes. All of which are practiced frequently for operational safety. The drone has safety features built in to the controller and drone, such as low battery alert, visual cues in real-time, and a 'home' feature that when selected, will automatically return the drone to the ground location in which it started from. I wish to use the drone for commercial aerial photography reasons only. At no time will I have the need to operate any more than 100' above ground. Many of my clients express the need to use the photographs for either assessing the condition of the roof, grounds, or for real estate listing purposes. Businesses, apartment complexes, home buyers and Realtor's will now have additional methods for making and assessing their potential or current investment. There will never be a time that use of the drone is within 5 miles of any public/military airport, private events (Weddings, reunions, etc.) public or sporting events, natural or local landmark interests, or outside of the US.Knowing public safety is paramount in operating this drone at all times, therefore frequent practice of operation of the drone is applied each and every time it leaves the ground, along with key safety features mentioned above.

Regards, David Thompson
Exhibit 35.1



LOGO

1123  Servicer Compliance Statement

Transactions Listed With SEC

I, Anthony
Renzi, Senior Vice President of CitiMortgage, Inc., certify that:

(a) A review of CitiMortgage, Inc. (the Servicer) activities during the 12
month period ending December 31, 2015 (Reporting Period) and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement as identified on Schedule A has been made under my supervision.

(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



| |  |                   |  |                                                                                
| |  | ----------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | February 24, 2016
| |  | By:               |  | LOGO                                                                           
| |  |                   |  |                                                                                
| |  | Name:             |  | Anthony Renzi                                                                  
| |  | Title:            |  | Senior Vice President, CitiMortgage, Inc.
Senior Officer in Charge of Servicing



---

Schedule A

Transactions Listed with SEC 2015



|                     |  |                                             |  |                                                                             
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Investor/Bond Number |  | Security or Deal                            |  | Party the Servicer is Reporting To (Master Servicer or Trustee or 
Investor)
|77056                |  | REDWOOD TRUST-WL 44                         |  | WELLS FARGO BANK - TRUSTEE                                                  
|-                    |  | SEQUOIA MORTGAGE TRUST 2013-8 (SEMT 2013-8) |  | CITIMORTGAGE, INC. MASTER SERVICING                                         
|77099                |  | CMLTI 2014-A                                |  | CITIBANK AGENCY AND TRUST                                                   
|77101                |  | NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC.                    |  | NEW RESI.MORTG. LOAN TRUST 2014-1                                           
|77106                |  | ABS LOAN TRUST III                          |  | C/O ABS LOAN TRUST III, LLC
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Portec Rail Products, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 May 12, 2006
    
    /s/ John S. CooperDate
    
    John S. CooperPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended May 31, 2004 of Evergreen Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers does hereby certify
that to the best of his or her knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.




Date:    October 21, 2004                            /s/ Timothy G. Wahlberg
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Timothy G. Wahlberg
                                                     President





Date:    October 21, 2004                            /s/ John A. Irwin
                                                     -----------------
                                                     John A. Irwin
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: "McDonough, Kevin" <KevinMcDonough@unitedconveyor.com>

To: Elizabeth Sabol <Elizabeth.Sabol@erg.com>

Date: 4/10/2013 2:53 PM Subject: RE: Confidential Footer Language

Elizabeth,

This message confirms that it is acceptable to UCC to remove the requested footer language.

Kevin L. McDonough Director, Sales - Americas United Conveyor Corporation

2100 Norman Drive West Waukegan, IL 60085-6753

Phone: 847-473-5900 ext.350

Fax: 847-473-5959

Email: kevinmcdonough@unitedconveyor.com< mailto:kevinmcdonough@unitedconveyorsupply.com> Website: www.unitedconveyor.com<http ://Website:%20www.unitedconveyor.com>

>>> Elizabeth Sabol 4/4/2013 10:11 AM >>> Kevin,

Attached, please find the e- mail chain that I was referencing in our convers ation earlier today (RE Ash Information for EPA Ste am ELGs_04132011). This email delivered the attachment:

EPA UCC_Ash Handling Attachment 041311.pdf

We are holding Figure 1 (Fly Ash Conveying System Performance Cons iderations) as confidential; ther efore, I didn't attach this document to the email. Please let me know if you'd like to discuss this further.

Additionally, there was an email conversation between Jezebele Alic ea, EPA and Mike Kipnis regarding steel silo costs. I've att ached that email chain as well (Action Items-EPA Call with UCC_04252011), could y ou please review and/or forward along to Mr. Kipnis and ask if it is OK to remove the same footer language? This email chain delivered the attachment:

EPA.docx

We did not find any confidential claims in this attachment; please let me know if you would like me to forward it along.

Thanks again,

Elizabeth

Elizabeth A. Sabol Environmental Engineer Eastern Research Group, Inc. 14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151 elizabeth.sabol@erg.com<mailto:elizabeth.sabol@erg.com>

Phone:610-344-0829
Before the Second Division,

April 1, 1952

No. 56519.

protest 162909-K (Ogdensburg).

#### E. Dillingham, Inc. *v.*United States,

*443Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that at the time of entry of the goods in controversy they were articles of which metal was the component material of chief value and were not ores or concentrates or crude metal; that said articles were imported to be used in remanufacture by melting; and that since entry, said articles were melted and remanufactured by melting. An examination of the papers disclosed that affidavits have been filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, *supra.*Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
(Reap. Dec. 9215)

#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 705368; 705308.

(Decided August 29, 1958)

*Jerome G. Clifford*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The proper dutiable value of certain analytical balances imported from Switzerland is the subject of the above-enumerated appeals for a reappraisement.

It has been stipulated and agreed by the parties hereto that at the time of exportation of the involved Mettler analytical balances, type 200A4N, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, Switzerland, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for home consumption at 1,248 Swiss francs each, plus 80 Swiss francs each for packing. It was further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher export value for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation.

The parties also agreed that the merchandise and issues herein are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues in *United States*v. *Fisher Scientific Co.; Fisher Scientific Co.*v. *United States,*44 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 122, C. A. D. 648, the record in which case has been incorporated herein.

Upon the foregoing agreed facts and the record before the court, I find and hold that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), is the proper basis of value for the Mettler analytical balances, type 200A4N, in issue, and that said value is 1,248 Swiss francs each, plus 80 Swiss francs each for packing. As to all other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.