alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00239

- CV

In re Danny Eaton §

§

§

§

§ Original Proceeding

From the 360th District Court

o f Tarrant Coun ty (360

- 557201

- 14 )

September 2 5 , 2014

Opinion by Justice Gabriel



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus filed by relator

Danny Eaton. We conditionally grant relator’s petition. Writ will issue only if the

trial court f ails to vacate the temporary orders granting spousal support and

interim attorney’s fees and return the monies deposited in the trial court’s registry

to Danny Eaton.

It is ordered that real party in interest Donna Rogers Eaton shall pay all

costs of this proceeding, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

____________ Justice Lee Gabriel
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:  November 10, 2006
    /s/ Sherri W. SchugartSherri W. SchugartChief Financial Officer 42
EXHIBIT 99.4   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Silver Trust (the "Trust") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Rostowsky, Chief Financial Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 
 This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
 
 Date: March 30, 2012
 
 
 /s/ STEVEN ROSTOWSKYSteven RostowskyChief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1684-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (FEMA-1684-DR), dated February 23, 2007, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

March 26, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of February 23, 2007: Schuylkill County for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison, 

Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management and Director of FEMA.

[FR Doc. E7-6094 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8518 

To require that the prevailing wage utilized for purposes of subchapter IV 

of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly referred to 

as the Davis-Bacon Act), be determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SELF, Mr. PALMER, Mr. 

DESJARLAIS, Mrs. LESKO, and Mr. NORMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To require that the prevailing wage utilized for purposes 

of subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States 

Code (commonly referred to as the Davis-Bacon Act), 

be determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsibility in Fed5 eral Contracting Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8518 IH

1 SEC. 2. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS DETERMINATION 

2 OF PREVAILING WAGE. 

3 Section 3142(b) of title 40, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(acting through the Bureau of 

6 Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor)’’ after 

7 ‘‘Secretary of Labor’’; and 

8 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 

9 following: ‘‘, using surveys carried out by the Bu10 reau of Labor Statistics that use proper random sta11 tistical sampling techniques’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### William Palen, *Receiver, etc., Appellant, v.*Ezra L. Bushnell, *Respondent, Impleaded, etc.*

— Order modified as directed in opinion, without costs to either party on the appeal. Opinion by Davis, P. J. —
EPA REGISTRATION 

NO.84229-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
46
47

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
48

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
49
50
51
______________________________________________________________

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 52 through 57 are not included in this copy. 

_________________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of 

information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

__X__ Identity of product impurities. 

__X__ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

__X___ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__ __ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

__ __ Internal deliberative information. 

_____ Attorney-client privilege. 

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

 Agency.

The information not included is generally considered confidential 

by product registrants. If you have any questions, please 

contact the individual who prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
______________________________________________________________

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 103 through 104 are not included in this copy. 

_________________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of 

information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

__ __ Identity of product impurities. 

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. 

__ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

__ __ FIFRA registration data. 

__ __ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _ .

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

__ __ Internal deliberative information. 

__ __ Privileged attorney-client communication. 

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

 Agency.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

VIOLATION DAY COUNT REPORT Aug. 1, 2016 Report Request ID:1468596 Report Code: AMP300

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID:AKMEBUST

State County City Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region 32 32 32 32 32 031

031 031 031 031 0016

0020 0022 0025 1005 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS Parameter ClassificationParameter Method Duration CRITERIA 42101

SELECTED OPTIONS

SINGLE EVENT PROCESSING MERGE PDF FILES AGENCY ROLE Option Type Option Value INCLUDE EVENTS YES PQAO SORT ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 Order Column

PARAMETER_CODE DURATION_CODE YEAR STATE_CODE AQS_SITE_ID DATE CRITERIA

1991 Start Date End Date 2016 01 01 03 31 Tribal Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS Standard Description CO 8-hour 1971UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Aug. 1, 2016 VIOLATION DAY COUNT REPORT

EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES EDT DESCRIPTION 0 1 2 5 NO EVENTS EVENTS EXCLUDED EVENTS INCLUDED EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDEDUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Aug. 1, 2016 VIOLATION DAY COUNT REPORT

Page 2 of 5 Carbon monoxide (42101) Parts per million (007) 8-HR RUN AVG END HOUR (Z)

1991

CBSA: Nevada

(39900) Reno, NV

SUMMARY FOR SITE 32-031-0016 POC 1 YEAR 1991 MAXIMUM VIOLATION VALUE 11 SITE ID POC DATE OF VIOLATION MAXIMUM

VIOLATION VALUE EXCEPT

DATA? COUNTY NAME HOUR OF MAXIMUM VIOLATION NONOVERLAPPING VIOLATIONS 32-031-0016 1 Washoe 1991/12/06 0 16 1 11

VIOLATION DAYS 1 1 NON-OVERLAPPING VIOLATIONSUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Aug. 1, 2016 VIOLATION DAY COUNT REPORT

Page 3 of 5 Carbon monoxide (42101) Parts per million (007) 8-HR RUN AVG END HOUR (Z)

1991

CBSA: Nevada

(39900) Reno, NV

SUMMARY FOR SITE 32-031-0022 POC 1 YEAR 1991 MAXIMUM VIOLATION VALUE 11 SITE ID POC DATE OF VIOLATION MAXIMUM

VIOLATION VALUE EXCEPT

DATA? COUNTY NAME HOUR OF MAXIMUM VIOLATION NONOVERLAPPING VIOLATIONS 32-031-0022 1 Washoe 1991/12/05 1991/12/12 0 0 23 23 1

1 11 10

VIOLATION DAYS 2 2 NON-OVERLAPPING VIOLATIONSUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Aug. 1, 2016 VIOLATION DAY COUNT REPORT

Page 4 of 5 Carbon monoxide (42101) Parts per million (007) 8-HR RUN AVG END HOUR (Z)

1991

CBSA: Nevada

(39900) Reno, NV

SUMMARY FOR SITE 32-031-1005 POC 1 YEAR 1991 MAXIMUM VIOLATION VALUE 10 SITE ID POC DATE OF VIOLATION MAXIMUM

VIOLATION VALUE EXCEPT

DATA? COUNTY NAME HOUR OF MAXIMUM VIOLATION NONOVERLAPPING VIOLATIONS 32-031-1005 1 Washoe 1991/12/13 0 1 1 10

VIOLATION DAYS 1 1 NON-OVERLAPPING VIOLATIONSUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Aug. 1, 2016 VIOLATION DAY COUNT REPORT

Page 5 of 5 Carbon monoxide (42101) Parts per million (007) 8-HR RUN AVG END HOUR (Z)

1991
Nevada

DATE OF VIOLATION HIGHEST

VIOLATION SITE COUNTY NAME NUMBER OF VIOLATION SITES MAXIMUM

VIOLATION VALUE MAXIMUM VIOLATION HOUR EXCEPT DATA? 1991/12/05 1991/12/06 1991/12/12 1991/12/13 32-031-0022

32-031-0016 32-031-0022 32-031-1005 Washoe Washoe Washoe Washoe 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 11 11 10 10 23 16 23 01 VIOLATION DAYS 4
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v. GEORGE H. MARSHALL, Jr., Seaman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant

5 USCMA 31, 17 CMR 31

No. 3531

Decided October 15, 1954

Cdr John T. Davies, USN, and Lt Harold Hoag, USN, for Appellant.

Cdr E. L. McDonald, USN, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Following trial by special court-martial — and on his plea of guilty — the accused, Marshall, was convicted of unauthorized absence, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 680. He was sentenced to receive a bad-conduct discharge, to partial forfeitures, and to confinement at hard labor for two months. The convening authority suspended the punitive discharge for six months, and provided for automatic remission thereof at the end of that period. For an account of the various proceedings, subsequent to the convening authority’s action, which culminated in our granting the present review, see United States v. Marshall, 4 USCMA 607, 16 CMR 181.

After the finding of guilty, and before imposition of sentence, trial counsel announced that he had evidence of two previous convictions of the accused, and stated the details thereof in open court. No objection was made by defense counsel. No documentary record of any prior conviction was offered in evidence, nor does the record contain any exhibit indicating that such evidence was received. The disposition of this case is thus controlled by our decisions in United States v. Carter, 1 USCMA 108, 2 CMR 14; United States, v. Trimiar, 1 USCMA 262, 2 CMR 169; and United States v. Schabel, 1 USCMA 275, 3 CMR 9. In conformity with the rule enunciated in those cases, the decision of the board of review is reversed, and the cause is remanded to The Judge Advocate General, United States Navy, for action not inconsistent with this opinion.
----

EXHIBIT 31.2 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Michael K. Longinotti, Chief Financial Officer of Gryphon GoldCorporation, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB ofGryphon Gold Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer's othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the registration's fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The small business issuer's othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer'sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a)   allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)   any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financialreporting. 

Date: August 14, 2007 

| By: /s/ Michael K. Longinotti |
|-------------------------------|
| Michael K. Longinotti         |
| Chief Financial Officer       |

----
No. 45082.

#### Protest 43558-K of Hammel, Riglander & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

On the agreed facts the circular saws in question were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 340 as claimed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.6


                             CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION
                            NEVADA-LODE MINING CLAIM

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that DESERT PACIFIC EXPLORATION INC.,
Incorporate in Nevada, whose address is 12475 Overbrook Drive, Reno, Nevada
89511, has located and claimed the Panorama #5 Lode Mining Claim in the
following quarter sections(s):

NE   1/4,    Section           Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB7M
NW   1/4,    Section           Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M
SE   1/4,    Section    11     Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M
SW   1/4,    Section           Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M

In Mineral County, Nevada, on the 30th day of October, 1996.

SAID CLAIM IS A LODE CLAIM, it being situated in the above mentioned County and
State, and is approximately 1500 feet long and 600 feet wide, such that 1475
feet is claimed in an South direction and 25 feet in an North direction from the
point of discovery (monument of location), at which the Notice of Location was
posted, together with 300 feet on each side of the monument of location and
center line of the Claim. The general course of the lode or vein is from the
South to the North.

THE NUMBER, LOCATION, AND MARKINGS On each monument are as follows:

         Location          Markings                Description
         --------          --------                -----------

No. 1 Northeast corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 2 Southeast corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 3 Southwest corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 4 Northwest corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post

A CLAIM MAP as required by NRS 517.040 is included as part of the work of
location.

Dated:  January 11, 1997

              RECEIVED                      DESERT PACIFIC EXPLORATION INC.
        Bur. Of Land Management
          9:00 A.M.  JAN 24 97              BY: /s/ Herb Duerr
        NEVADA STATE OFFICE                     Herb Duerr, President
              RENO, NEVADA
Case No. 6,830.

#### The HUDSON.

[The case reported under above title in 14 Int. Rev. Rec. 36, is the same as Case No. 6,-829.]
#### Charles Wager and others, Appellants, *v.*Eliza H. Wager, *Respondent, Impleaded,*with others.

— -Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to-abide the final award of costs. Opinion by Hardin, J.