alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2010-H1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    CitiMortgage, Inc. as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee and
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian.

    Dated:   March 22, 2011


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Pricher, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 1009]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered June 1, 1994, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of the legal sufficiency of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant’s intent to cause "serious physical injury” to the complainant with a loaded firearm (Penal Law § 120.10; *see,*Penal Law § 265.03; *People v Bracey,*41 NY2d 296; *People v Garland,*177 AD2d 410). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for ap*379pellate review, and, in any event, without merit. Joy, J. P., Hart, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
No. 53621.

protest 140427-K (New York).

#### The Coca Cola Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cocoa residue similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Maywood Chemical Works et al.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 87, C. D. 1165), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
July 19, 1939

No. 41861.

#### Protest 946855-G of Dan Brechner & Co.

Abstract 41518. Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
No. 50562.

#### Protests 465334-G, etc., of Draeger Shipping Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the goatskins the subject of *Jacobson & Kupitshy*v. *United States*(T. D. 47950), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1420 was sustained.
Exhibit 35.1





AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





I, Paul C. Honda, do
hereby certify that I am the Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Compliance Officer of American Honda Finance Corporation,
a California corporation (the "Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the
"Servicer" and "Sponsor") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of May
1, 2010 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as successor to American Honda Receivables Corp., as Seller,
and Honda Auto Receivables 2010-2 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2012, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                            

| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand this 1stday of June, 2012.







| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                          
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Paul C. Honda                                              
| | Vice President, Assistant Secretary, and Compliance Officer
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00209-CR

JAVON PETERSON APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 5 OF DENT ON COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. CR-2013-03810-E

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Javon Peterson appeals he r conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI). 2 We affirm. The State charged ap pellant with committing DWI. At trial, she pled not guilty. After receiving the parties’ evid ence and arguments, a jury found her

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04(a) (West Supp. 2016).2 guilty. Appellant chose the trial court to decide her punishment. The trial court assessed thirty days’ confinement but su spended imposition of that sentence and placed appellant on community supervisio n, with several cond itions, for twelve months. Appellant brought this appeal, and the trial court appointed counsel to represent her. Appellant’s appointed appe llate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief under Anders v. California , representing that ther e are “no non-frivolous issues” that could support the appeal. 386 U.S. 738, 744–45, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demo nstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. See id. ; In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 406–12 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (analyzing the effect of Anders ). We gave appellant an opportunity to file a pro se response to counsel’s brief, and she did so. The State has not filed a brief. Once an appellant’s court-appointed atto rney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that an appeal is frivolous and fu lfills the requirements of Anders , we must independently ex amine the record. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Only th en may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). We have carefully reviewed the record , counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro se response. We agree with counsel t hat this appeal is frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See3 Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State , 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim . App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw an d affirm the trial court’s judgment.
/s/ Terrie Livingston TERRIE LIVINGSTON CHIEF JUSTICE PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIEL and SUDDERTH, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: August 26, 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.10.3

January 22, 2001

Mr. Peter A. Darbee, Sr. VP and CFO
PG&E Corporation
One Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA  94105

Dear Peter:

You are an essential member of our senior executive team and I view your
contribution as vital to getting the Corporation through its current challenges,
achieving the Corporation's objectives, and providing strong returns to
shareholders.

The Board of Directors recently approved a Senior Executive Retention program
which includes you.  Under this program, you will receive a grant of phantom
PG&E Corporation restricted stock units granted under the PG&E Corporation Long-
Term Incentive Plan.  The amount of your grant is $2,250,000 and it translates
into 230,770 units calculated at the closing price of PG&E Corporation common
stock on January 22, 2001, of $9.75 per share.  An extremely small number of
individuals are included in this arrangement.  For this reason, it is absolutely
necessary for you to restrict any conversation on this subject to me or Brent
Stanley.

Your grant of phantom PG&E Corporation restricted stock units is effective
January 22, 2001, and will vest on December 31, 2004, subject to either one of
the following conditions:

  -  50 percent will automatically vest on December 31, 2004. The remaining 50
     percent will vest on December 31, 2004 only if the Corporation's
     performance, as measured by relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) on a
     cumulative basis over four years, is at or above the 55th percentile of its
     comparator group; or

  -  if, at the end of the third year of the grant, December 31, 2003, the
     Corporation's performance as measured by relative TSR on a cumulative
     basis, is at or above the 75th percentile of its comparator group, the
     entire grant will vest.

You may elect to defer your actual award payments under the PG&E Corporation
Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan prior to the award cliff-vesting.  Such
deferrals will be made in PG&E Corporation phantom stock units on the first
business day of January of the year following vesting.  Awards not deferred will
be paid either entirely in PG&E Corporation stock or half in PG&E Corporation
stock and half in cash in January of the year following vesting.

Peter, I look forward to your continued strong contributions to PG&E
Corporation's success.

Sincerely,

ROBERT D. GLYNN, JR.
---

|Exhibit 32.2                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|                                             
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                       
|                                             
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|                                             
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lorne Lilley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sunergy, Inc., for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sunergy, Inc.

|Date: November 14, 2007 | By: /s/ Lorne Lilley                  
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------
|                        | Lorne Lilley, Secretary, Treasurer and
|                        | Principal Accounting Officer          
|                        |                                       





---
(Reap. Dec. 8884)

Entry No. 909482.

#### D. Hauser, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided June 25, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above, limited to merchandise assessed for duty under Paragraph 1518, at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the invoice unit values plus cost of packing plus two percent.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher domestic value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reap-praisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise assessed for duty under paragraph 1518, and that such values were the invoice unit values, plus cost of packing, plus 2 per centum.

Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise, it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### Penson & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7499.

Entry No. 703827.

In voice-dated London, England, July 1945.

Certified July 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 28, 1945.

(Decided January 7, 1948)

*Hyman H. Bernstein*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The
undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the Form 10-Q filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented
therein.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William L. Hedgepeth II          
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | William L. Hedgepeth II              
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



46
#### Bailey-Mora Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7324.

Pro forma invoices dated Toluca, Mexico, August 24, 1943, etc.

Entered at El Paso, Tex., September 23, 1943, etc.

Entry Nos. 901; 980.

(Decided June 30, 1947)

*Philip Stein*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Bichard H. Welsh,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

These are appeals for reappraisement of chairs imported from Mexico.

At the trial, counsel for the plaintiff stated:

> * * * The advance in value is so insignificant that to try to establish any of the facts would in any event refute it, because we have to go to Mexico to establish the fluctuating market.

> Consequently, since there was a fluctuating market and there could have been an honest difference of opinion, we are willing to abandon, because we feel that we will get our best relief from the petition for remission of additional duties, which is a greater sum.

> Judge Cline: Then this case is abandoned without prejudice as to the good faith in the remission case; is that what you want?

> Mr. Stein: That is right.

> Mr. Welsh: You can say Mr. Welsh makes that concession upon the advice of the Appraiser, Mr. Kleinman,

The appeals for reappraisement are therefore dismissed without prejudice as to the good, faith in the remission case. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32
**CERTIFICATION**
Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Christopher Naughton, the President and Chief Executive Officer ofMarshall Edwards, Inc. (the “registrant”), and David R. Seaton, the Chief Financial Officer of theregistrant, each hereby certifies that, to his or her knowledge:
1.  The registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and 2.  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by the PeriodicReport and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by the PeriodicReport.
These certifications accompany the Form 10-Q to which they relate, are not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
Dated: February 9, 2005   /s/ Christopher Naughton /s/ David Seaton   Christopher Naughton David R. SeatonChief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
----

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gryphon GoldCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Michael K. Longinotti, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| Date: November 14,    2006 |                                                                                                |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                |
|                       | By:           /s/ Michael K. Longinotti                |
|                       |                 Michael K. Longinotti   |
|                       |                 Chief Financial Officer |

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      PUBLIC ACCOUNTING REFORM AND INVESTOR PROTECTION ACT OF
      2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aeolus Pharmaceuticals,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
      Richard P. Burgoon, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Michael P. McManus, Chief
      Accounting Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
                period
                covered by the Report and results of operations of the Company for
                the
                period covered by the Report.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request.





This
      certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
      with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
      the
      Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (whether made before or
      after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in such filing.








/s/John
      L. McManus


John
      L.
      McManus


President
      and Chief Operating Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


August
      11, 2006








/s/
      Michael P. McManus


Michael
      P. McManus


Chief
      Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary


August
      11, 2006