alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Mark A. Redman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: August 1, 2005 /s/ Mark A. Redman         Mark A. Redman    Vice President — Finance, Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### HARRY M. SCHACHTER, PROSECUTOR, v. LOUIS C. HAUENSTEIN, RESPONDENT.

Submitted July 3, 1918

Decided November 18, 1918.

A municipal ordinance, which simply adds an additional penalty for local infringement of the Vice and Immorality act is a legal exercise of legislative power vested in the municipality.

On *certiorari*removing ordinance of town of Union.

Before Justices Parker and Minturn.

Eor the prosecutor, *Levitan & Levitan.*

For the respondent, *J. Emil Walscheid.*

. The opinion of the court was delivered by

Minturn, J.

The object of this writ is to review a conviction of the prosecutor, for the violation of the provisions of an ordinance of the town of Union, in Hudson county.

The ordinance provides that the keeping open on Sunday of any store for the sale or barter of certain classes of goods enumerated in the ordinance within the town, shall be unlawful, and prescribes a penalty for failure to comply with its provision.

The prosecutor was convicted and fined by the recorder of the town for failure to observe the provisions of the ordinance. His contention now is that the ordinance is not constitutional, because its effect is to close some and not all stores in the town.

*105The provisions of the ordinance are clearly aimed at the pursuing of a business or occupation on Sunday, which has been carried on by the proprietor during the rest of the week; the manifest purpose being to secure the first clay of the week as a day of rest. The question raised here that the ordinance is discriminatory in its operation cannot avail the prosecutor, since the Tice and Immorality act being a general act is in nowise contravened by the passage of the ordinance, and, therefore, the presumption exists that all within the prohibited class enumerated in the statute, of which this prosecutor is one, will obey the statutory Sunday law.

The ordinance simply adds an additional penalty for local infringement, and this, it has been held, is a legal exercise of the charter police power, and is therefore constitutional.

The case presents a substantial repetition of the facts contained in *Sherman*v. Paterson, 82 *N. J. L.*345, and is therefore controlled by it. That adjudication has since been followed in *Schumacker*v. *Little*Falls, *post p.*106, and the case before us may therefore be determined upon the doctrine of *stare decisis.*See also *Cooley Const. Lim.*199.

Since the determination of the Sherman case, the legislature has enacted what is popularly termed the “Home Rule act'’ *(Pamph. L.*1917, *p.*319), which concedes to every municipality a liberal power of providing by ordinance to cover every act which in its operation and incidents may work detrimentally to the “public health, safety and prosperity of the municipality and its inhabitants,” and which may be necessary “to carry into effect the powers and duties conferred and imposed by this act or any law of the state.”

In either aspect of the situation the ordinance in question was a legal exercise of legislative power vested in the municipality, and the conviction under it must be sustained.
EXHIBIT 10.51

RECEIPT AND TERMINATION

OF

CONSULTING AGREEMENT

Reference is hereby made to that certain Consulting Agreement (the Consulting Agreement), dated as of September 17, 2008, by and between Gordmans, Inc. (the
Company) and Sun Capital Partners Management V, LLC (Management). Gordmans Stores, Inc., which indirectly holds 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company, filed a Form S-1 Registration
Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2010 with the intent of making an initial public offering of shares as soon as practicable after the Registration Statement becomes effective (the IPO).
Management hereby acknowledges that contingent upon the completion of the IPO and receipt by Management of a $7,500,000 termination fee as well as all amounts owed by the Company to Management under the Consulting Agreement as of the completion of
the IPO under or in connection with the Consulting Agreement, that no further amounts will be due and owing from the Company or any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company to Management. Management and the Company hereby agree that, effective as of
the completion of the IPO and receipt by Management of the aforementioned funds, the Consulting Agreement is hereby terminated and the undersigned shall have no further rights or obligations thereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Termination of Consulting Agreement as of the 16 day of July, 2010.



|               |  |                 
|-------------- |  | ----------------
|GORDMANS, INC.
|               | 
|By:            |  | /s/ Jeff Gordman
|Name:          |  | Jeff Gordman    
|Title:         |  | President & CEO 



|                                       |  |                                   
|-------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|SUN CAPITAL PARTNERS MANAGEMENT V, LLC
|                                       | 
|By:                                    |  | /s/ Michael McConvery             
|Name:                                  |  | Michael McConvery                 
|Title:                                 |  | Vice President and Asst. Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the
amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 of
Winecom Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 16, 2011


/s/ Shamir Benita
--------------------------------------------------------------
Shamir Benita, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### Victory Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7509.

Entry No. AD 726.

Invoice dated Perivale, England, February 28, 1946.

Certified February 28, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 25, 1946.

(Decided January 16, 1948)

No appearance by the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When this appeal for reappraisement was called for hearing-, there was no appearance on behalf of the appealing party.

Under rule 6 of this court, where there is no appearance in a case when it is called “it shall be deemed submitted, and shall be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.”

I have examined the record in this appeal for reappraisement and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I, therefore, find that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
ACC Meeting February 20, 2015 for TDI SNUR 

Name Office Phone 

L
No. 50560.

#### Protest 60379-K of S. Farkash, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
#### Hugo A. Asbach *v.*United States

No. 7338.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 11, 1947.

Entry No. Bag. Dec. 908612.

(Decided July 16, 1947)

*Arthur Stoll*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. S-pedor,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliyee, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement involves the dutiable value of a gold bracelet imported by the plaintiff, a passenger arriving on the S. S. *Marine Perch*on February 11, 1947.

The article in question was entered on a baggage declaration and appraised at a valuation of $2,000, which amount was higher than its declared value.

Upon the trial it was agreed between counsel for the respective parties that the value of this bracelet was only $750.

I therefore find the correct dutiable value of the bracelet in issue to be $750.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Synergy  Financial  Group,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
we,  John S.  Fiore,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and A.  Richard
Abrahamian, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                         <C>

/s/John S. Fiore                               /s/A. Richard Abrahamian
-------------------------------------------    -------------------------------------------------
John S. Fiore                                  A. Richard Abrahamian
President and Chief Executive Officer          Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: May 10, 2007                             Date: May 10, 2007

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coast Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Justin D. Locke, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: July 28, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Justin D. Locke                  
|                    |  |     |  | Justin D. Locke, Senior Vice         
|                    |  |     |  | President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:11-cr-132

Lazaro Lopez-Pompa 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 21) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: July 14, 2011 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cr-00132-JLG Doc #: 23 Filed: 07/14/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
----

| (a) | a review of SLC’s activities during the calendar year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) and of SLC’s performance under the Servicing Agreement has been                      made under my supervision; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b) | to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, SLC has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the                      Reporting Period. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Timothy Schmidt                                                 |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Timothy Schmidt                                                     |   |
|   | Title: | Senior Vice President and Treasurer of The Student Loan Corporation |

----
Modeling
- related citations & documents for AZ FIP NFRM docket

sjb 2012
- 11
- 14 **Modeling documents** (all are EPA work products) “Modeling files explanation and list” readme_modeling_files_NFR1.txt “Revised PM Speciation for Cholla Unit 2” 2006FinalDryBot tomPC_FGD_FFpmSpeciationProfile_Cholla Unit2 - filtPM.xls “Cholla merged stack impacts” Cholla_mrg23_visx_table.xls “Cholla remodeling inputs and outputs” Cholla_NFR_remodeling.xls “Coronado SCR impacts” Coronado_base_p_visx.xls **Modeling -**  **related docum**  **ents cited**  (some o f these are already in the docket from the proposal) Interagency Workgroup On Air Quality Modeling (IWAQM) Phase 2 Summary Report And Recommendations For Modeling Long Range Transport Impacts (EPA
- 454/R
- 98
- 019), EPA OAQPS, December 1998, http://www.epa.gov/scram001/7thconf/calpuff/phase2.pdf IWAQM_phase2.pdf [guidance document, already in docket for proposal] Proposed Rule: Source Specific Federal Implementation Plan f or Implementing Best Available Retrofit Technology

for Four Corners Power Plant: Navajo Nation Technical Support Document FCPP Technical Support Document 10 - 6 - 10.pdf [Oct. 6, 2010, EPA rulemaking] Measurements of Ambient Background Ammonia on the Colorad o Plateau and Visibility Modeling Implications , Salt River Project, Dr. Ivar Tombach, Consultant, and Robert Paine, AECOM Environment, September 2010 NH3 Monitoring Report 2010 - 09 - 22.pdf [Sep., 2010, Public comment ] [this is “Exhibit B” of APS’s comments ] Federal Land Managers’ Air Quality Related Values Work Group (FLAG) Phase I Report

— Revised (2010) , U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service, U.S. Fish And Wildlife Service, October 2010. http://www.nature.nps.gov/air/Pubs/pdf/flag/FLAG_2010.pdf FLAG_ 2010.pdf [ Oct. 2010, guidance document]“CALPUFF Regulatory Update”, Roger W. Brode, Presentation at Regional/State/L ocal Modelers Workshop, June 10

– 12, 2008; http://www.cleanairinfo.com/regionalstatelocalmodelingworkshop/archive/2008/agenda.htm BRODE_CA .pdf [Additional document; June, 2008] Estimating Total Sulfuric Acid Emissions from Stationary Power Plants , Version 2010a, 1020636, Technical Update, Electric Power Research Institute, April 2010) 2010 epri report h2so4.pdf [ Additional document; already in docket for proposal]
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v HUGO CHAVEZ-REY, JR., Airman First Class, U. S. Air Force, Appellant UNITED STATES, Appellee v LARRY D. W. LEMONS, Airman First Class, U. S. Air Force, Appellant UNITED STATES, Appellee v RICHARD L. CUMBERLEDGE, Airman First Class, U. S. Air Force, Appellant UNITED STATES, Appellee v HERBERT BROOKS, JR., Sergeant, U. S. Air Force, Appellant

No. 29,658

No. 29,659

No. 29,767

No. 29,878

May 23, 1975

*Colonel William E. Cordingly, Major John A. Cutts, III,*and *Captain Byron D. Baur*were on the pleadings for Appellants, Accused.

*Colonel C. F. Bennett, Lieutenant Colonel Abraham A. Dash,*USAFR, and *Captain Frederick P. Waite*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

*413OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

Each of these appellants stands convicted by general court-martial of multiple offenses primarily alleging either the possession, use, transfer, distribution or sale of prohibited narcotic substances. Although each of these cases was separately tried at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, the situs of the alleged offenses, they were all convened and later reviewed by the Commanding General, 12th Air Force, who was physically located at Bergstrom Air Force Base, Texas. We granted review to determine whether the commanding general was disqualified from reviewing and acting upon these cases under our decisions in *United States v Sierra-Albino,*23 USCMA 63, 48 CMR 534 (1974) and *United States v Dickerson,*22 USCMA 489, 47 CMR 790 (1973).

The records of trial reveal that the base commander of Holloman Air Force Base and his staff judge advocate had made certain promises of immunity or clemency to at legist two prosecution witnesses in order to obtain their testimony in these cases. This was acknowledged by the staff judge advocate in the post-trial reviews to the commanding general.

When holding in *United States v Sierra-Albino, supra,*that a convening authority and his staff judge advocate were disqualified to review and act upon a record upon learning that a subordinate had officially placed his imprimatur on a witness’ credibility, we stated:1

> Whenever a convening authority learns a subordinate has vouched for the credibility of a witness by extending immunity, it is still asking too much of the convening authority to free himself wholly of the influence of his subordinate’s judgment in his own review and action upon the case.

We accordingly hold that since the commanding general was aware that a subordinate had vouched for the credibility of certain prosecution witnesses by extending immunity and clemency to them, he was disqualified to review and act upon the records in these cases. •

The decisions of the United States Air Force Court of Military Review are reversed and the actions of the Commanding General, 12th Air Force, Bergstrom Air Force Base, Texas, are set aside. The records of trial are returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for assignment to a different convening authority and staff judge advocate for a new review and action in each case.

Chief Judge Fletcher did not participate in the decision of these cases.

1

23 USCMA at 65, 48 CMR at 536.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofNorcross Safety Products L.L.C. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended October 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated:   November 15, 2005 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT A. PETERSON                          |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   | Robert A. Peterson                              |
|                                 |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and  Manager |
|                                 |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                  |

 

 

**A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will beretained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.**

 

----