alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14608-14609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5659]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-14868-B; AK-964-1410-KC-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving lands for conveyance pursuant to the 
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to K'oyitl'ots'ina, 
Limited, Successor in Interest to Bin Googa, Inc. The lands are in the 
vicinity of Huslia, Alaska, and are located in:

Kateel River Meridian, Alaska

T. 6 N., R. 11 E.,

[[Page 14609]]

    Sec. 9;
    Secs. 16 and 17;
    Secs. 20 and 21;
    Secs. 28, 29, and 30;
    Sec. 33.

T. 6 N., R. 12 E.,
    Sec. 22;
    Secs. 26, 27, and 28.

    The subsurface estate in these lands will be conveyed to Doyon, 
Limited when the surface estate is conveyed to K'oyitl'ots'ina, 
Limited, Successor in Interest to Bin Googa, Inc. Notice of the 
decision will also be published four times in the Fairbanks Daily News 
Miner.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until April 27, 2007 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by 
phone at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcbdb7f2beb0b1f2bfb3b2aab9a5bdb2bfb99cbdb7f2beb0b1f2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcbdb7f2beb0b1f2bfb3b2aab9a5bdb2bfb99cbdb7f2beb0b1f2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

D. Kay Erben,
Land Law Examiner, Branch of Adjudication II.
[FR Doc. E7-5659 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 52379.

protest 66443-K (New York).

#### Cosby Brush & Import Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance -with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on entry 815995. The protest was sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFUNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report ofUniversal City Development Partners, Ltd. (the"Company") and UCDP Finance, Inc. on Form10-Q for the period ending June 26, 2004 filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Robert K. Gault, Jr. certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|          |                                                                                                                     |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1)  | the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|          |                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2)  | the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                      |  |                                                                                         |  |  |  |  |
|----------------------|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Dated:August 9, 2004 |  | By:   /s/ Robert K. Gault,Jr. Robert K. Gault, Jr. Principal ExecutiveOfficer |
|                      |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

PAMELA MURPHY, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (ACE CHECK CASHING INC.), 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 137 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I, Rex E. Bosen, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Provide Commerce, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 29, 2005
**Exhibit 21**

 

Subsidiaries of theRegistrant

 
| **Legal  Name of Entity**                   | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Organization** | ** ** | **Ownership Interest**    |   |
|---------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|---------------------------|--------|
| Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc (registrant) |       | Virginia                         |       |                      |   |
| Virginia Commerce Bank                      |       | Virginia                         |       | 100%                      |   |
| Northeast Land and  Development Corp        |       | Virginia                         |       | 100%                      |   |
| Virginia Commerce  Insurance Agency, L.L.C. |       | Virginia                         |       | 100%                      |   |
| VCBI Capital Trust II                       |       | Delaware                         |       | 100% of voting securities |   |
| VCBI Capital Trust III                      |       | Delaware                         |       | 100% of voting securities |   |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v CHARLES R. COX, Fireman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant

17 USCMA 294, 38 CMR 92

No. 20,602

November 24, 1967

*Lieutenant David E. Miller,*USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel C. R. Larouche,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

Tried by special court-martial, the accused was found guilty of three specifications of unauthorized absence, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, 10 USC § 886, and one count of breach of restriction, in violation of Code, supra, Article 134, 10 USC § 934. Evidence of two previous convictions was received. Accused was sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of $67.00 per month for two months, and confinement at hard labor for two months. Intermediate appellate authorities have affirmed.

*295At the trial, the president did not inform the court members that a bad-conduct discharge was available only as a permissible additional punishment, either because of the previous convictions or the number of offenses tried together. See Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, paragraph 127c, section B. This was error and, under the circumstances, prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused. United States v Yocom, 17 USCMA 270, 38 CMR 68; United States v Hutton, 14 USCMA 366, 34 CMR 146.

The petition for review is granted, and the decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The board may reassess the sentence or order a rehearing thereon.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.
Exhibit 32





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.





The undersigned, who are the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Business Development Corporation of America (the “Company”), each hereby certify as follows:





To the best of his knowledge, the annual report of Form 10-K of the Company, which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 9 th day of March 2016





/s/ Peter M. BudkoPeter M. BudkoChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Corinne D. PankovcinCorinne D. PankovcinChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
(V. D. 47)

Entry No. 14128.

#### Consolidated Sewing Machine Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided July 25, 1957)

*Stein & Shostak*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the third division of this court in *Consolidated Sewing Machine Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*37 Cust. Ct. 314, Abstract 60179. The conclusion therein, and the judgment issued pursuant thereto, was to the effect that the protest had been *527prematurely filed and the matter was remanded to a single judge in reappraisement to determine the proper dutiable values in the manner provided by law. (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).)

A stipulation of submission, úpon which the matter is now before me, establishes cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for reappraisement of the sewing machines, the electric motors, and the carrying cases in question, and that such statutory value for each class of articles is as set forth in schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.01
                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Pacult, chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
White Oak Financial Services, Inc., the general partner of Providence Select
Fund, Limited Partnership (the "Fund" or the "Registrant"), does hereby
certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

  (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

  (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

  (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

  (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



By:  /s/ Michael Pacult
     Michael Pacult



Date: November 14, 2005
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LAVINIA GARDNER, *ET ALS.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

*Messrs. Narrow & Evans*and *Mr. Charles Camp Cotton*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Thomas L. Smith*and *Mr. Norman Telsey*for the respondent.

April 18, 1967.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**PAMELA MURPHY,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ACE CHECK CASHING INC.),** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 137 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 2nd day of November, 2015, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

Inconnection with the quarterly report of DayStar Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the“Report”), I, Robert G. Aldrich, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: August 10, 2009
----

Exhibit 32.1 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), theundersigned officer of Gryphon Gold Corporation, (the "Company") does herebycertify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") that: 

1. 

The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

2. 

The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: August 13, 2008 

/s/ John L. Key                                                                      John L. Key Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as partof the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  November 10, 2005
    
    /s/ John S. CooperDate
    
    John S. Cooper, President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 10, 2005
    
    /s/ Michael D. BornakDate
    
    Michael D. Bornak, Vice President of Finance and Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 34.2




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP)









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The Board of Directors


U.S. Bank National Association






We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Report on Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), as defined in management’s assertion, as of March 31, 2012, and for the period fromApril 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012, except for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i)–(iv), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)–(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)–(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing Platform covered by this report.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.




In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of March 31, 2012, and for the periodfrom April 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012, for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.




/s/ Ernst & Young LLP






Minneapolis, Minnesota


May 31, 2012