alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frederick Larcombe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)         Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:  April 15, 2011

/s/ Frederick LarcombeBy:  Frederick LarcombeIts:  Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. and will be retained by Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1





WRITTEN
STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES —
OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (“the Company”), each hereby certifies
that to his/her knowledge, on the date hereof:





(a) the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008,
filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section l3(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b) information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: May
15,
2008                                                                            /s/ CHARLESN. HAZEN


Charles N. Hazen


President and Chief Executive
Officer











Date: May
15,
2008                                                                                      /s/ SHERRIW. SCHUGART


Sherri W. Schugart


Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(a)


       STEPHEN E. ROTH
 DIRECT LINE: (202) 383-0158

 Internet: sroth@sablaw.com



                                April 26, 2001



Board of Directors
GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company
6610 W. Broad Street
Richmond, VA  23230

                  Re   GE Life & Annuity Separate Account 4
                       ------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

                  We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the
caption "Legal Matters" in the Statement of Additional Information filed as part
of Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4
filed by GE Life & Annuity Separate Account 4 for certain flexible premium
variable deferred annuity contracts (File No. 333-31172). In giving this
consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is
required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP



                                          By: /s/ STEPHEN E. ROTH
                                              ____________________________
                                              Stephen E. Roth
EXHIBIT 32.4

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UCDP FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tracey L.
Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 8, 2008



By:

/s/ TRACEY L. STOCKWELLTracey L. Stockwell Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)




31
No. 59102.

protests 508473-G, etc. (New York).

#### Strumeyer & Ladenheim *v.*United States,

*385Opinion by

Oliver, G. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that thfe merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
No. 44108.

#### Protest 916423-G(A)/11094 of W. T. Grant Co. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protest was dismissed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2935

_____________________________ C. C.
,
Petitioner
,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES , T HE G UARDIAN AD L ITEM , a nd J EWISH F AMILY S ERVICES , Respondent s

.

_____ ________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 25, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P. , 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal).

W OLF , K ELSEY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

C.C., pro se
, Petitioner

. Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Children’s Legal Services, Jacksonville
, for Respondent Department of Child ren and Families

. No appearance for Guardian ad Litem or Jewish Family Services, Respondents.
No. 65617.

#### Ace Import Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/11950, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64185, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of United America Indemnity, Ltd. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Kevin L. Tate, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 10, 2005 /s/ Kevin L. TateKevin L. Tate
Chief Financial Officer
(Reap. Dec. 8750)

#### J. E. Bebnard & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. W-01551.

(Decided February 14, 1957)

*Wallace & Schwartz*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the foEowing stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

*601IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States concerning the merchandise referred to in the attached Schedule A, as follows:

> 1. Said merchandise consists of binoculars and leather carrying eases which, in *John P. Herher & Co. Inc.*v. *United States,*C. D. 1519, this Court held to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of articles.

> 2. At the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers, in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, is the unit price as shown in the attached Schedule A, in United States currency, less the deductions from said unit price as invoiced, cases and packing as shown in said Schedule A, the foreign value of such or similar merchandise being no higher.

> 3. The above reappraisement is abandoned as to all entries and merchandise not listed in the attached Schedule A, and said reappraisement may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the binoculars and leather carrying cases here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> Schedule “A”

> *Merchandise United States dollars per each*

> 50 pcs. *3yj'*6 x 15

> Binoculars_ _ 4.05

> Carrying cases.. __ 1. 50

> Net packed

> 50 pcs. 3}¿" 6 x 18

> Binoculars_ 5. 88

> Carrying cases_ 1. 50

> Net packed

> 50 pcs. *Z%"*6 x 18

> Binoculars_ 6. 85

> Carrying cases_ 1. 50

> Net packed

Less the deductions from said unit prices, as invoiced

Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise, it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
SERVED: OCTOBER 15, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

VECTOR USA LLC 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0687 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011S0070002) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

/~~-

/ 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Ken Hammerton 

Vector- USA, LLC 

d/b/a Vectair -USA, LLC 

11299 Airport Road 

Olive Branch, MS 38654 

TEL: 662-893-6775 

ONE COPY 

Andrea Michelle Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

1701 Columbia A venue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Ron. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0687 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. CP07-23-002] 

Take notice that on March 14, 2007, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, the following changes to its tariff, effective February 27, 2007: 

*Second Revised Volume No. 1*

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 4 

*Original Volume No. 2*

Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 2 

First Revised Sheet No. 283 

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible online at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 13, 2007.                 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-6204 Filed 4-3-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Letterhead of Milestone Scientific]

                                 March 27, 2001

Mr. Robert Gintel
71 Baldwin Farm South
Greenwich, CT 06831

            Re:   Milestone Scientific Inc. ("Milestone")
                  Purchase of 500,000 shares of Common Stock

Dear Mr. Gintel:

      This will confirm that Milestone has agreed to sell to you, and that you
have agreed to purchase from Milestone, 500,000 shares (the "Shares") of
Milestone's common stock, par value $.001 per share, for the sum of $500,000.
Further, Milestone will use its reasonable best efforts to file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission no later than June 30, 2001, and to cause to
become effective, a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Securities Act") on Form S-3, and under any applicable state
securities laws, registering the reoffer, resale or other disposition of the
Shares.

      This also will confirm that (i) you are an "accredited investor" within
the meaning of Rule 215 of the Rules and Regulations under the Securities Act,
and (ii) you have acquired the Shares for investment and acknowledge that they
cannot be resold or otherwise disposed of until they are registered under the
Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws or an exemption from
registration is available.

      Since the Shares will not be registered at the time of issuance, the
certificates representing the Shares delivered to you will bear the following
legend:

      THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER
      THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. THE SHARES HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT
      AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR ASSIGNED IN THE ABSENCE OF AN
      EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FOR THESE SHARES UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT
      OF 1933 OR AN OPINION OF THE COMPANY'S COUNSEL THAT REGISTRATION IS NOT
      REQUIRED UNDER THE SAID ACT.

<PAGE>

                                                                          [LOGO]

Mr. Robert Gintel
March 27, 2001

            Please acknowledge your agreement and understanding of the above
provisions by signing and dating a copy of this letter and returning it to us by
facsimile and mail.

                                            Sincerely,

                                            MILESTONE SCIENTIFIC INC.


                                            By: /s/ Leonard Osser
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Leonard Osser, Chairman and
                                               Chief Executive Officer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO
THIS 30th  DAY OF MARCH 2001


/s Robert Gintel
---------------------------
    ROBERT GINTEL


                                       2
[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________
No. 16

- 17296

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:15

- cv

- 00497

- MHT

- TFM

WEST ALABAMA WOMEN’S CENTER, on behalf of themselves and their patients, WILLIAM J. PARKER, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ALABAMA WOMEN’S CENTER, YASHICA ROBINSON WHITE,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

versus
DONALD E. WILLIAMSON, in his official capacity as State Health Officer, et al.,

Defendant
, THOMAS M. MILLER, Dr., in his official capacity as State Health Officer, LUTHER J. STRANGE, III, in his official capacity as Alabama Attorney General, LYN HEAD, in her official capacity as District Attorney for Tuscaloosa County, ROBERT L. BROUSSA RD, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Madison County,

Defendants

- Appellants.________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

________________________ Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Jud ge, and ABRAMS, * District Judge.

PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from the grant of a preliminary injunction that was issued

on October 27, 2016 and w as last amended on November 22, 2016. W. Ala

.
Women’s Ctr. v. Miller , 217 F. Supp. 3d 1313 (M.D. Ala. 2016). The appeal was
scheduled to be orally argued before this Court at 9:00 a.m. on Friday morning,

October 27, 2017. At approximately 12:30 p.m. on Thursday afternoon, October

26, 2017, the district court issued a permanent injunction, accompanied by a 148

- page opinion, and it entered final judgment in the case. As a result, this appeal is

moot. See Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc. , 527

U.S. 308, 315, 119 S. Ct. 1961, 1966 (1999) (“Generally, an appeal from the grant

of a preliminary injunction becomes moot when the trial court enters a permanent

injunction, because the former merges into the latter.”); Cone Corp. v.

Hill sborough Cty. , 908 F.2d 908, 912 n.5 (11th Cir. 1990) (collecting cases) (“The

County’s challenge to the issuance of the preliminary injunction is moot regardless

* Honorable Leslie Joyce Abrams, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation.of our disposition of this case on its merits because a permanent injunction has

issued.”).

A PPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Before the Second Division,

May 31, 1960

No. 64253.

protests 228787-K and 228788-K (NewYork).

#### Meadows Wye & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1982

ABDOU-MALIK YACOUBOU ADAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. 

(1:09-cv-02387-ELH)

Submitted: March 27, 2012 Decided: April 6, 2012

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdou-Malik Yacoubou Adam, Appellant Pro Se. Michael S. 

Barranco, TREANOR, POPE & HUGHES, Towson, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Abdou-Malik Yacoubou Adam seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders granting in part and denying in part the parties’ 

cross-motions for summary judgment and denying his motion to 

expedite. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). The orders Adam seeks to appeal are neither final 

orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. 

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MONTERIUS DESEAN SHARP, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1893 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 13, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Laura E. Ward, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Linsey Sims-Bohnenstiehl, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 10.11

Protalex, Inc.
c/o Frank M. Dougherty, Esq. 2632 Mesilla NE
Albuquerque NM 87110-3660
August 21, 2003


I, Dr.  Paul L. Mann,  hereby  reiterate  and affirm my existing  obligation  to
cooperate with and assist  Protalex,  Inc. in connection with any  international
patent applications or other filings that Protalex, Inc. may initiate in respect
of the patent I developed and filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in
April,  2002 and which I  subsequently  assigned  to  Protalex,  Inc. I agree to
execute and acknowledge  such  applications,  assignments and other documents as
may be necessary or desirable to obtain  patent  rights for said patent in other
countries  and to  transfer  ownership  of said  patent  to  Protalex,  Inc.  in
accordance with the laws of other countries.  All costs and expenses  associated
with  obtaining  such patent  protection  and  ownership  of the patent in other
countries shall be the responsibility of Protalex, Inc.



Paul L. Mann

Dr. Paul L. Mann