alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1507

JAVIER ALEXIS REYES,

 Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: February 17, 2023 Decided: April 18, 2023

Before RICHARDSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Ivan Yacub, YACUB LAW OFFICES, LLC, Woodbridge, Virginia, for 

Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Janice K. 

Redfern, Senior Litigation Counsel, Beau J. Baumann, Office of Immigration Litigation, 

Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1507 Doc: 23 Filed: 04/18/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Javier Alexis Reyes, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an 

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s 

decision denying Reyes’ motion to terminate and denying his application for cancellation 

of removal. On appeal, Reyes raises a single claim, contending that 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.15(b)-(c) (2022) is inconsistent with 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1)(G) and is therefore ultra 

vires. We find no reversible error and so deny the petition for review. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1507 Doc: 23 Filed: 04/18/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 42995.

#### Protest 946845-G of P. C. Kuyper Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In view of the agreed facts the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry and refund the duty taken on the two cases in question.
June 12, 2000

                         DOMAIN NAME PURCHASE AGREEMENT
                                     Between
                                H. Page Howe and
                      Internet Properties Development, Inc.




This letter is an agreement between Internet Properties Development, Inc. (the
"Buyer"), a wholly owned subsidiary of KwikWeb.com, Inc., a Nevada Corporation,
and H. Page Howe (the "Seller"), regarding the transfer and sale of the Internet
domain names and their corresponding Internet and Intellectual assets described
in Exhibit "A".

The agreed terms and points of the sale are as follows:

         1.  In consideration of the transfer of the domain the Buyer will; pay
             the Seller $25,000 Twenty-five & none within 30 (thirty) days of
             today's date, following a reasonable period of due diligence.

         2.  In the event of the Sale of any of the Assets purchased in this
             transaction (Exhibit "A"), issue the Seller a BONUS PAYMENT(S)
             equal to 25% (twenty-five percent) of the Sale proceeds.

         3.  In the event of a re-capitalization of any of the Assets purchased
             in this transaction (Exhibit "A"), issue the Seller a BONUS
             PAYMENT(S) equal to 25% (twenty-five percent) of the property's
             re-capitalization valuation.








Buyer:


/s/ Matthew Hayes
-------------------------------
Internet Properties Development, Inc.
Matthew Hayes, President




Seller:


/s/ H. Page Howe
-------------------------------
H.PAGE HOWE
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129865 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC:129865 

 COA: 261303 

Mecosta CC: 02-004875-FC 

KEVIN LAMONT ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 27, 2006 

Clerk
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Currency Series.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                             
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund
Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                               
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                    
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: May 8, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - (Docket 45-2006)

Notice is hereby given of the withdrawal of the application requesting manufacturing authority on behalf of Panasonic Consumer Electronics Co., and its warehouse/FTZ operator Norvanco International Inc. The application was filed on November 8, 2006 (71 FR 69203, 11/30/06).

The withdrawal was requested because of changed circumstances, and the case has been closed without prejudice.

Dated: March 27, 2007.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-6087 Filed 3-30-02; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
No. 46832.

#### Protests 981784-G, etc., of Bergdorf & Goodman Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain of the hemmed mufflers in question were imported prior to the effective date of the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753). These were accordingly held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1209. The hemmed mufflers imported subsequent to the trade agreement (T. D. 49753) were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 1209 and (T. D. 49753) as claimed. Protests sustained in part.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed July 26, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2065

Lower Tribunal No. F20-9772A

________________

Michelle Contreras,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, 

Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa 

Tinkler Mendez, Judge.

Black Srebnick, and Benjamin S. Waxman, for appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kseniya Smychkouskaya, 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ. 

MILLER, J.
2

Appellant, Michelle Contreras, challenges her convictions and 

sentences for trafficking in illegal narcotics, conspiring to traffic in illegal 

narcotics, and use of a two-way communications device to commit the 

trafficking offense. Discerning no reversible error, we affirm without 

prejudice to raising the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel in a timely 

motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 

3.850. See Steiger v. State, 328 So. 3d 926, 929 (Fla. 2021) (holding 

“unpreserved claims of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be raised or 

result in reversal on direct appeal” absent a showing of fundamental error); 

see also Britton v. State, 414 So. 2d 638, 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (“[T]he 

order of presentation of evidence and witnesses is largely a function of the 

trial court’s discretion; this discretion is broad enough to allow the state to 

introduce, after the defendant’s case, evidence not strictly in rebuttal, so long 

as the evidence was admissible in the main case.”); Lewis v. State, 711 So. 

2d 205, 208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (concluding prosecutor’s comments during 

closing arguments that bolstered victim testimony and attacked defense 

counsel were harmless error given overwhelming evidence of defendant’s 

guilt).

Affirmed.
No. 50161.

#### Protests 104960-K, etc., of Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of JowayHealth Industries Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (Amendment No. 1) for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yuan Huang,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: February 23, 2012 

/s/ YuanHuang 

Yuan Huang, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 99.3





CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Silver Trust (the "Trust") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric S. Sprott, Chief Executive Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.


This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: March 30, 2012








/s/ ERIC S. SPROTTEric S. SprottChief Executive Officer
From: kenneth.gardner@metso.com [ mailto:kenneth.gardner@metso.com ] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 8:37 AM To: Erik Boleman Subject: RE: Low-NOx Burners for Taconite Indurating Furnaces

Metso has a patent to inject on board air into a kiln. The technology is based on running the firing zone of the kiln deficient in O2 or very low and adding mid kiln air to complete combustion. Iron ore kilns have a substantial amount of excess air coming from the co oler that we do not believe the on board air will reduce NOx. Kenneth L. Gardner, P. E. Vice President Pyro Systems Tel: 570-271-7637 Fax: 570-275-6789 Mobile: 570-850-3050



### Item 9
July 9, 1940

No. 44120.

#### Protests 912346-G, etc., of Fred Haslam & Co., Inc., et al.

Application by plaintiffs for rehearing granted.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the Form 10-Q filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William L. Hedgepeth II          
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | William L. Hedgepeth II              
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 6840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2700]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2004-16951]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Request for Comments; 
Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Aircraft Liability 
Insurance

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary published a document in the 
Federal Register on December 7, 2010, concerning a request for renewal 
of a previously approved information collection. We are correcting the 
document as set forth below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lauralyn Remo, Chief, Air Carrier 
Fitness Division (X-56), Office of Aviation Analysis, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, 
SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

Correction

    In the December 7, 2010, Federal Register [75 FR 76066], correct 
the Estimated Total Burden on Respondents to read:
    Estimated Total Burden on Respondents: 3,450 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC on January 31, 2011.
Todd M. Homan,
Director, Office of Aviation Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2011-2700 Filed 2-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
No. 46805.

#### Protests 71724-K, etc., of Oldetyme Distillers, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From an examination of the official papers the court was unable to find anything sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protests were therefore overruled.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN VALANTINO SALOTTI, INC. AND A&J CAPITAL, INC.


         THIS  AGREEMENT,  dated this 16th day of February,  1999 is between and
among Valantino  Salotti,  Inc., a New York  Corporation with offices located at
248 Flushing Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11205,  (hereinafter referred to as "VS"), and
A&J Capital,  Inc., a New York  Corporation  with offices located at 4 West 47th
Street, New York, NY 10036 (hereinafter referred to as "AJ").

         WHEREAS, VS and its shareholder wish to sell, transfer and exchange 10%
of the respective rights, title and interest and 10% shares in VS; and

         WHEREAS,  the Board of  Directors  of VS has  consented  to such  sale,
transfer and exchange; and

         WHEREAS,  AJ desires to purchase 10% of the aforesaid  shares of VS for
and in consideration of The Price referred to below.

         IN CONSIDERATION  of the purpose of this AGREEMENT,  all parties hereby
mutually and individually acknowledge and agree to the following:

         1. LETTER OF INTENT TO SELL. The PARTY hereby agrees to sell,  transfer
and exchange 10% of the respective  shares in VS to AJ, said shares to aggregate
10 shares of common  stock,  no par  value,  constituting  10% of the issued and
outstanding  shares in and to VS, and AJ hereby  agrees to purchase  all of said
shares for and in  consideration  of the Purchase Price referred to in Paragraph
2.

         2. Purchase Price. All Parties hereby agree that the purchase price for
10% of the VS shares referred to in Paragraph 1 shall be $200,000.00.  VS agrees
and its shareholders  are willing to accept  $50,000.00 on February 16, 1999 and
$150,000.00 on February 23, 1999.

         3.  Closing.  Closing of the above  referenced  transaction  shall take
place after the  production  and approval of due diligence  along with the final
payment of $150,000.00 as listed in #2, at the offices of Maxnet,  Inc.  located
at 4400 US Hwy 9, Suite 2800, Freehold, New Jersey 07728.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  parties and the  authorized  representatives
hereto have set their  respective  hands in execution  of this  AGREEMENT on the
date recited in the Preamble of this AGREEMENT.

Valantino Salotti, Inc.                         A&J Capital, Inc.


By:                                             By:
   --------------------------                      -----------------------------
       Henry Val, CEO                                  A&J Capital, President
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that to the best of his knowledge (1) this Annual Report of Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and its results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.


Date: March 14, 2018/s/ Todd C. BuilioneTodd C. BuilioneChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: March 14, 2018/s/ Thomas MurphyThomas MurphyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 33.2

MANAGEMENT’S
ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE



Management of the Agency
and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Management has determined
that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period
as follows:



Platform:
Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and
certain privately issued (i.e., for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile
loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”).



Applicable
Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria
in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following
criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv),
which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable
Servicing Criteria”).



Period:
Twelve months ended December 31, 2011 (the “Period”).



With respect to the
Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to
the Applicable Servicing Criteria:



| | · | The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In making this assessment, management
used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



KPMG LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.



CITIBANK,
N.A.



By: /s/ Karen
Montbach

Its: Managing
Director

Dated: February 28, 2012