alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Roche, Appellant, *v.*Harrisburg Incinerator Authority.

Argued May 5, 1969.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*Louis J. Adler,*for appellant.

*James H. Stewart, Jr.,*with him *John 0. Sullimn,*and *Nauman, Smith, Shissler & Hall,*for appellees.

June 27, 1969 :

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Decree affirmed. Appellant to pay costs.

Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Pomeroy would affirm on the opinion of the court below.

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen:

Since the building which houses the incinerator is included as part of the contract and is specifically designed to house a particular patented system, the invitation for alternative bids is a subterfuge because no bidder could submit a proposal in competition with the patented system. The form of the specification unlawfully limited competitive bidding since the building and the system were in reality one proprietary item.

I dissent.
#### Henry Humphries, Resp’t, *v.*Solomon S. Alexander, App’lt.

Order modified so as to allow the attachment to be amended so that it may stand for $116.85 debt and costs, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs to either party of the appeal.
02/27/2013 13:58 FAX 2024935142 FAA ~ OMS Ill 007/009 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEUERAL 1\ VTATlON .ADMTNISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEAIUNOS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

HECEIVED -------------__,..-------eF~ER~~--'~1 2 2013 

J.n the Matter of Central Virginia Aviation, Inc. 

2012EA21003l 

Judge Not Assigned 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

HEAR~NG DOCKET 

The Clerk is requested to enter the appearance of Agency's Counsel. All 

communications, notices, pleadings or documents are respectfullY requested to be 

forwarded as follows: 

Zachary M. Berman 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553~3258 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

Respectfully sub111itted. 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: 

en nan 

''.i'''"\ 

!\,,) 

Dated: 2 - :J "" f 3 
02/27/2013 13:58 FAX 2024935142 

• 

1930 Hu~tuenot Ro<Jd 

ro Box 35655 

Rlchmond, VA 23235 

(804) 320-9100 

CowanGates.com 

Feder"-1 Aviation Administration 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk 

800 Independe11CC1Avenue, S.W. 

Room 924A 

Washington, DC 20591 

FAA 

February 4, 2013 

~ OMS 

Di\VIO H. GATES 

(!104) 3:?.0-91 00 

(1!04) 330-3140 

(804) 512-6985 moi!Ue 

liCATES@COWAI'ICATE.S,CO:I-1 

2463·033 

Rc: Federal Aviation Administration v. Central Virginia Aviation, Inc. 

Docket No. 2012EA210031 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Please con~ider this letter Central Virginia Aviation, lnc.' s reque:;l for a hearing in the 

above-referenced matter. Our Firm has will be representing Mr. Ham.1.p and Cenlnil Virginia 

A viatiQn, Inc. in the pmceedings. 

!tJ 008/009 

There i::; already a hearing scheduled for December 3, 2013 in FAA v. Central Vjrginia 

Aviation, lnc. Docket No. 2012EA21 0024. The allegations in this new matter arise from the same 

flight as those in Docket No. 2012EA210024. l would ask the hearing in the above-referenced 

matter also be sel fur hearing December 3, 2013. For your convenience, 1 have enclosed a copy of 

the Scheduling Order in Docket No. 2012EA210024. 

Thank you for your assistance with thb mancr. Should you have any questions, please do 

not hesitate to contact me. 

cc: 

. / .. ·· 

Zachary M. Berman, Esq. 

Ocnnls F. Hanup, lil 

David H. Gates 

CowAN GATES 

In any case. 
02/27/2013 13:58 FAX 2024835142 FAA ~ OMS 

~ERTIFJCA T.t;: OF SERVlCE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice of Appearance has been placed this date in 

the United States mail, postage prepaid, by Certitied Mail - Retunt Receipt 

Requested addressed as tollows: 

David H. Gates, Esq. 

Cowan Gates 

1930 Huguenot Road 

P .0. Box 35655 

Richmond, VA 23235 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

ROO Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Room 2014 

r -,.. -· 201:': r::.: :! 

Date:· ·---

-'/ I" 

~--· . ,_,.... .. /,_ 

Paralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

141008/008
EXHIBIT 32.02

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
White Oak Financial Services, Inc. as general partner of Providence Select
Fund, L.P., certify that (i) the Form 10Q for the period ended September 30,
2005 of Providence Select Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Form 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2005
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Providence Select Fund, L.P.


PROVIDENCE SELECT FUND, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By:  White Oak Financial Services, Inc., General Partner


By:  /s/ Michael Pacult
     Michael Pacult
     Chief Executive Officer &
     Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2005
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO






18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,






AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the annual report of Equal Energy Ltd. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Don Klapko, President and Chief Executive Officer of Equal Energy Ltd.., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)


The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)


The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.


/s/ Don Klapko

Don Klapko

President and Chief Executive Officer

of Equal Energy Ltd.




March 14, 2013
## IN T HE C OURTOF CRIMINAL APPE ALS OF T EX AS PD - 1539- 07 R O B E R T H U FFM A N , A ppel l ant

v . T HE S T AT E OF T E XAS ON DI S CR E T I ONAR Y R E VI E W OF CA SE 0 4 - 0 6 - 0 0 1 2 6 - CR O F THE FOU RTH CO UR T OF A PP EALS BEX AR CO UN TY W OM ACK , J. , f i led a conc ur r i ng opi ni on. I agr ee w i th the obs ervat i on i n J udge M ey er s ’ s opi ni on ( a n te ) th at th e c o u rt ’s char ge t o the j urypr es ent ed theor i es of l i abi l i tythatw er e notr ai s ed bythe evi dence , and w i th J udge C ochr an’ s opi ni on ( po st) th a t th e re w a s o n lyo n e o f f e n se a n dth a t a c h a rg e in th e d isju n c tiv e c o u ldb e p ro p e r. T h e re f o re I c o n c u r in th e ju d g m e n t o f th e C o u rt. Fi l ed: O ct ober1, 2008 Publ i s h.
EXHIBIT 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002












In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of China ShouGuan Mining Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the






“Report”), I, Ming Cheung, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






a) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






b) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated:  April 14, 2011






CHINA SHOUGUAN MINING CORPORATION, Registrant






/s/ Ming Cheung




By: Ming Cheung, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K / A for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Emmanuel Tsoupanarias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 31, 2011


/s/ Emmanuel TsoupanariasEmmanuel TsoupanariasChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and will be retained by Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Filed 1/21/16 P. v. Polito CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ANTHONY JOSEPH POLITO

,

Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B 26 5331

(Super. Ct. No. 201 4010577 )

( Ventura County)

Anthony Joseph Polito appeals a judgment following his no contest

plea to possession of cocaine for sale, a felony. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11 351.)

The trial court denied his motion to vacate his plea.

We appointed counsel to represent him on this appeal. After

examination of the record

, his c ounsel filed an opening brief requesting the court

to make an independent review under People v. Wen de (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.

On October 27 , 201 5 , we advised Polito that he had 30 days within

which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished us to

consider. No response has been received to this date. After examination of the

record

, w e are satisfied that Polito's attorney has fully complied with h is2

responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. ( People v. Wende

, supra

, 25

Cal.3d at pp. 441 , 443. )

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

GILBERT, P. J.

We conc ur:

YEGAN

, J.

PERREN, J.3 Patricia M. Murphy, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for

Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Re spondent.
No. 49263.

#### Protests 992686-G, etc., of Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**





I,
      Marc L.
      Rose, Chief Financial Officer of Protalex, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby
      certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as
      amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
      that:





(1)
      the
      Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2008 (the
      "Report"), to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated:
      August 29, 2008


By:
      /s/
      Marc L. Rose





Marc
      L.
      Rose


Vice
      President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
      Treasurer
No. 41874.

#### Protest 682329-G of Nippon Dry Goods Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It appeared that in filing a duress certificate under section 489, Tariff Act of 1930, through clerical error the customs broker failed to cite the correct entries in pending reappraisements. On the authority of *Yamada*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 89, T. D. 49628) the protest was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 209 (Monday, October 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 65547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26527]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9747-6]

Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Committee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA announced in the Federal Register on October 3, 2012 [FRL-
9737-3] a Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Committee (FRRCC) 
Teleconference to be held on October 22, 2012. Under the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463, EPA gives notice of 
cancellation of that public meeting for the Farm, Ranch, and Rural 
Communities Committee (FRRCC). The FRRCC provides policy advice, 
information, and recommendations to the EPA Administrator on a range of 
environmental issues and policies that are of importance to agriculture 
and rural communities. The purpose of this teleconference was to 
discuss specific topics of relevance for consideration by the Committee 
in order to provide advice and insights to the Agency on environmental 
policies and programs that affect and engage agriculture and rural 
communities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alicia Kaiser, Designated Federal 
Officer, kaiser.alicia@epa.gov, 202-564-7273, U.S. EPA, Office of the 
Administrator (1101A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20460.

    Dated: October 17, 2012.
Alicia Kaiser,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-26527 Filed 10-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Case: 2:10-cv-01008-MHW-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/31/12 Page: 1 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01008-MHW-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/31/12 Page: 2 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01008-MHW-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/31/12 Page: 3 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01008-MHW-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/31/12 Page: 4 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01008-MHW-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/31/12 Page: 5 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01008-MHW-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/31/12 Page: 6 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01008-MHW-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/31/12 Page: 7 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01008-MHW-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/31/12 Page: 8 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01008-MHW-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/31/12 Page: 9 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01008-MHW-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/31/12 Page: 10 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T21:17:23-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John A. Scarlett, M.D., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tercica, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 16,2004
No. 54157.

#### T. Sumida & Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 602207-G (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15709-15710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6074]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1688-DR]


Iowa; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1688-DR), dated March 14, 2007, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 26, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 14, 2007: Mahaska and Polk Counties for Public 
Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public

[[Page 15710]]

Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management and Director of FEMA.
 [FR Doc. E7-6074 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### The People of the State of New York, *Respondents, v.*Thomas McDonnell, *Appellant.*

— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that,
to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lisa F. Campbell                                
|                        |  |     |  | Lisa F. Campbell                                    
|                        |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Fisher, Bruce & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6326.

Entry No. 1056, etc.

Invoices dated Longton, England, September 5, 1941, etc.

Certified September 5, 1941, etc.

Entered at Philadelphia, Pa., October 13, 1941, etc.

(Decided August 22, 1946)

*Benjamin A. Levett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise consisting of earthenware and chinaware and the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn*Corp., Suit No. 4513, C. A. D. 334, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the appraised value of the merchandise consisting of earthenware and chinaware involved in each of the cases enumerated in the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar eases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, m the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the *289additions made by tbe importer on entry because of advances by tbe appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as tbe appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.