alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

d0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

145203

RICHARD R. ROBERTS and STACY D.

ROBERTS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 145203

COA: 300547

Leelanau CC: 10-008259-NM

LAWRENCE R. LASUSA, LASUSA LAW

OFFICES, PLC, and CALCUTT, ROGERS &

BOYNTON, PLLC,

Defendants-Appellees, 

and

JOSHUA M. REYNOLDS,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit
      32** **.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Geoffrey Alison, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of TRAVEL HUNT HOLDINGS, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
      that:





1.
      The
      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31,
      2007
      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
      this **** 14th
      day
      of December, 2007.








*/s/
                Geoffrey Alison*Geoffrey
                AlisonChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      TRAVEL HUNT HOLDINGS, INC. and will be retained by TRAVEL HUNT HOLDINGS, INC.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8819 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8819

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a credit 
against tax, or refund of tax, for certain Federal insurance taxes for 
      employees who are members of religious faiths which oppose 
                    participation in such insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2024

   Mr. Balderson (for himself, Mr. Smucker, and Mr. Miller of Ohio) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a credit 
against tax, or refund of tax, for certain Federal insurance taxes for 
      employees who are members of religious faiths which oppose 
                    participation in such insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Religious Exemptions for Social 
Security and Healthcare Taxes Act''.

SEC. 2. CREDIT OR REFUND OF CERTAIN FEDERAL INSURANCE TAXES FOR MEMBERS 
              OF CERTAIN RELIGIOUS FAITHS.

    (a) In General.--Section 6413 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Credit or Refunds of Certain Federal Insurance Taxes for 
Members of Certain Religious Faiths.--
            ``(1) In general.--An employee who receives wages with 
        respect to which the tax imposed by section 3101 is deducted 
        during a taxable year for which an authorization granted under 
        this subsection applies shall be entitled (subject to the 
        provisions of section 31(b)) to a credit or refund of the 
        amount of tax so deducted.
            ``(2) Authorization for credit or refund.--Any individual 
        may file an application for authorization under this subsection 
        if he is an individual described in the first sentence of 
        section 1402(g)(1). Rules similar to the rules of 1402(g)(1) 
        shall apply to the granting of such authorization and rules 
        similar to section 1402(g)(2) shall apply with respect to the 
        period for which such authorization is in effect.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to taxable years beginning after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 9287)

#### Wakem & McLaughlin, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 3767.

(Decided December 31, 1958)

*Wallace & Schwartz*(Barnes, *Richardson & Colburn*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain so-called “Musketeer” glass bottles that were exported from France and entered at the port of Chicago, Ill.

*440Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the “Musketeer” bottles in question is export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such dutiable value for the merchandise is $6 per case, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8634 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit a report to Congress 

on crimes committed by individuals granted parole under the Immigration 

and Nationality Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2024 

Mr. LUTTRELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit 

a report to Congress on crimes committed by individuals 

granted parole under the Immigration and Nationality 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal Illegal Alien 

5 Report Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8634 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON CRIMES COMMITTED BY RECIPIENTS 

2 OF PAROLE UNDER THE IMMIGRATION AND 

3 NATIONALITY ACT. 

4 Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment 

5 of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall sub6 mit to Congress a report on number of individuals who 

7 are present in the United States pursuant to a grant of 

8 parole under the Processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nica9 raguans, and Venezuelans or any other grant of parole 

10 under section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nation11 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)) who have committed 

12 crimes in the United States, including the nationalities of 

13 such individuals, and any ties of such individuals to terror14 ists and transnational criminal groups. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
August 4, 1941

No. 46241.

Suit 4331.

#### United *States*v. *Iwai & Co., Ltd.*

Abstract 44027 affirmed. C. A. D. 171.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United America Indemnity, Ltd.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Kevin L. Tate

Kevin L. Tate
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.96.1

Schedule Identifying Substantially Identical Agreement(s)  to Exhibit 10.96

Amendment One, dated as of June 23, 2000, by and between Collins Trust II and
Collins Holdings EME

Amendment One, dated as of June 23, 2000, by and between Collins Trust III and
Collins Holdings EME

Amendment One, dated as of June 23, 2000, by and between Collins Trust IV and
Collins Holdings EME
(Reap. Dec. 9217)

#### International Hat Company et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. CE 2426, etc.

(Decided September 4, 1958)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (Allerton deC. Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Henry J. O’Neill,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

La whence, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule *“A,”*attached to and made part of the decision herein, were consolidated for the purposes of trial.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact, whereby it was agreed that the merchandise covered by said appeals for a reappraisement consists of braid or of palm leaf hat bodies imported from Mexico, similar in all material respects to the hat bodies which were the subject of decision in *International Hat Company*v. *United States,*39 Cust. Ct. 669, Reap. Dec. 9006. It was further stipulated and agreed that the issues involved in the instant appeals are similar in all material respects to those in the *International Hat Company*case, *supra,*the record in which case has been incorporated herein.

It was further stipulated by the parties that the appraised values of the merchandise covered by the reappraisement appeals in controversy, less the 8 per centum commission or the 10 per centum *536commission as included by the appraiser in his finding of value, are equal to the market values or the prices at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

Upon the agreed facts before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the braid or palm leaf hat bodies in issue and that said value is represented by the appraised values, less the 8 per centum or 10 per centum buying commission which was included by the appraiser in his appraisement.

As to all other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 64240.

protest 59/29727 (Tampa).

#### Fruit & Easter Basket Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
HAROLD ALLAN PATE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-2473

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 1, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County.

Colby Peel, Acting Judge.

Harold Allan Pate, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, RAY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth S. Klipper, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Dated: February 9, 2009/s/ KENNETH S. KLIPPER Kenneth S. Klipper
Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer


---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8666 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8666

 To amend title 28, United States Code, to authorize holding court for 
          the Central Division of Utah in Moab and Monticello.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2024

 Ms. Maloy (for herself and Mr. Curtis) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 28, United States Code, to authorize holding court for 
          the Central Division of Utah in Moab and Monticello.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDICIAL DISTRICT.

    Section 125 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``and St. George'' and inserting ``St. George, Moab, and Monticello.''
                                 <all>
```
Order filed, May 3, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00138-CR

____________

KHALEEM HASAN GUILLORY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 183rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1322045

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 9, 2012, 2012. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. On April 16, 2012, this court issued an order for Janet Ragan to file the 

reporters record on or before May 16, 2012. To date, the record has not been filed with 

the court. Because the reporter’s record will not be filed within the time prescribed in the 

first order, the court GRANTS your request and issues the following order.

We order Janet Ragan, the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

on or before June 11, 2012. No further extension will be entertained. The trial and 
appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely 

filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Janet Ragan does not timely file the record as 

ordered, the Court may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to 

determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
Before the Second Division,

July 5, 1938

No. 38953.

#### Protest 351300-G of Style Curtain Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of fringes in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to the merchandise involved in Ab-*331stxact 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sus-. tained.
EXHIBIT 4.10


                                    SCHEDULE

                   Information on six substantially identical
                        Indemnity and Guaranty Agreements
                           dated as of March 23, 2001
             by Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc. as Indemnitor
                 in favor of First Union National Bank as Lender


       (Six additional documents are identical, except as set forth below,
                    to the document included as Exhibit 4.2)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                           Principal
Apartment Property                              Borrower                                                      Amount
------------------                              --------                                                      ------
<S>                                             <C>                                                        <C>
Harbour Club Apartments                         CRIT-VA II, Inc.                                           8,475,000
Virginia Beach, Virginia

Highland Hills Apartments                       CRIT-NC III, LLC                                          14,775,000
Carrboro, North Carolina

Canyon Hills                                    CAC II Limited Partnership                                12,675,000
Austin, Texas

Park Village                                    CAC II Limited Partnership                                 8,500,000
Bedford, Texas

Summertree                                      CAC II Limited Partnership                                 7,750,000
Dallas, Texas

The Courts on Pear Ridge                        CAC II Limited Partnership                                10,575,000
Dallas, Texas
</TABLE>
# National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

# Alcohol Alert Archives 

https://www.arcr.niaaa.nih.gov/alert_archives.htm
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert J. Zatta, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc.for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc.

 

 
| Date: May 17, 2004                         |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ ROBERT J. ZATTA                        |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                            |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
No. 49777.

#### Protests 965526-G, etc., of Chong Kee Jan & Co. et al. (San Francisco) .

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was classified and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the ve-tsin, found to contain salt, was excluded from paragraph 5, and protests sustained to this extent.