alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Related cases: 

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

-

Conce1·n levels: 

Type of Concern: 

Level of Concern: 

Health 

2 

Persistence 

2 

Exposure Based Review: 

Health: No 

Ecotox: No 

Routes of exposure: 

Keywords: 

SAT Report 

PMN Number: P-15-0435 

SAT Date: 5/8/2015 

Print Date: 5/29/2015 

Eco Comments 

2 

Yes 

Bioaccum 

1 

Toxicity 

2 

Comments 

Health: Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water 

Fate: ; 

Keywords: BLOOD ADRENALS SPLEEN KIDNEY LYMPH NODE DEVEL 

ONCO MUTA UNCERT-IMMUNO/DEVEL/NEURO ALGAL SHADING 

Summary of Assessment: 

Fate: 

Fate Summary: P-15-0435 

FATE: 

Solid 

S = Soluble 

VP < l.OE-6 ton at 25 C (E) 

BP = Dec. >250 C (E) 

H < 1.00E-8 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 0 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg ~ mo 
Time for primruy anaerobic biodeg (azo)::::; da 

S01ption to soils/sediments = low 

PBT Potential: P2B 1 

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl 

Indirect photolysis will be moderate 

Health: 

Health Summary: Abs01ption of the intact is nil through the skin 

and GI tract and good the Expect in the intestines with 

good absopriton of the based on is uncettain concem for 

immunotoxicity, tox1c1ty, nemotoxicity forth~ 0 There is also 

concem for blood effects, developmental toxicity, oncogenicity, and mutagenicity for the -

and concem for oncogenicity and mutagenicity for the 

Based on the results of a 28-day oral study for this 

1s concem for anemia and effects on the adrenals, 

spleen, kidney, lymph unmunotoxicityo The NOEL from this study is rep01ted to be 

15 mg/kgo Moderate concemo 

Test Data: 28-day oral study in rats (15, 150, 1000 mg/kg) - anemia, 

effects on adrenal glands, spleen, kidneys, lymph nodes; NOEL= 15 mg/kgEcotox: 

Test Test Test End Predicted Measured Comments 

Organism Type Point 

fish 96-h LC50 >100 

daphnid 48-h LC50 >100 

green algal 96-h EC50 20 

fish chronic >10 - value 

daphnid - chronic >10 

value 

algal - chronic 2 

value 

Sewag~ 3-h EC50 - ludg~ 

Sewag~ - Chronic - ludg~ Value 

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions ruoe based on SARs for-; SAR chemical 

class = 0 solid with unknown mp (P); S > 170000 mg/L at 20 C (M); 

effective concentrations on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness 

<18000 mg/L as CaC03; and TOC <200 mg/L 

FactorsiValues I Comments 
based on shading 

on shading 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

SAT Chair:-

Fate assessor: Ecotox assessor:- Health assessor:
**Exhibit 15.1**

 
|  |  |
|--|--|

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-195020) and on Form F-3 (No. 333-204586) of Nord Anglia Education, Inc. of our report dated November 29, 2016, except for Note 29(i) as to which the date is June 9, 2017, relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 20-F/A.

 

**/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers** Hong Kong

June 9, 2017

 

***PricewaterhouseCoopers****22/F Prince’s Building, Central, Hong Kong*

*T +852 2289 8888, F +852 2810 9888, www.pwchk.com*

 

----
No. 51088.

#### Protests 96990-K, etc., of E. Lasry Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to the Komano, Sbrinz, Sardo, Provolone, and Pecorino cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706). In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of *2}&*percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8810 

To amend subpart 1 of part B of title IV of the Social Security Act to 

provide for legal representation in certain child welfare proceedings, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2024 

Ms. TENNEY (for herself and Ms. SCANLON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend subpart 1 of part B of title IV of the Social 

Security Act to provide for legal representation in certain 

child welfare proceedings, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Legal Rep5 resentation for Child Welfare Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATE PLANS FOR CHILD WELFARE SERVICES. 

7 Section 422(b)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 622(b)(4)) is amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8810 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

2 after the semicolon; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (B), by adding ‘‘and’’ at 

4 the end; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(C) the steps that the State will take to 

7 ensure that, with respect to any judicial pro8 ceeding involving a child and in which there is 

9 an allegation of child abuse or child neglect, in10 cluding a proceeding on dependency, adoption, 

11 guardianship, or termination of parental rights, 

12 information about and access to available inde13 pendent legal representation is provided, as ap14 propriate, to— 

15 ‘‘(i) the child; and 

16 ‘‘(ii) any individual who is a parent or 

17 guardian, or has custody, of the child;’’. 

18 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

19 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by this 

20 Act shall take effect on October 1, 2026, and shall apply 

21 to payments made under subpart 1 of part B of title IV 

22 of the Social Security Act for calendar quarters beginning 

23 on or after such date. 

24 (b) DELAY PERMITTED IF STATE LEGISLATION IS

25 REQUIRED.—If the Secretary of Health and Human ServVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:29 Jun 27, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8810.IH H8810

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8810 IH

1 ices determines that State legislation (other than legisla2 tion appropriating funds) is required in order for any 

3 State plan approved under subpart 1 of part B of title 

4 IV of the Social Security Act to meet the additional re5 quirements imposed by the amendments made by this Act, 

6 the plan shall not be regarded as failing to meet any of 

7 the additional requirements before the 1st day of the 1st 

8 calendar quarter beginning after the 1st regular session 

9 of the State legislature that begins after October 1, 2026. 

10 For purposes of the preceding sentence, if the State has 

11 a 2-year legislative session, each year of the session is 

12 deemed to be a separate regular session of the State legis13 lature. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
ENCLOSURE 3

RECORD OF HEARING AND SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY

As required by 40 CFR 51.102(e), the complete record of the hearing, along with a list 

of witnesses and the text of the written presentations or summary of the oral 

presentations, is located at the Office of Air Regulatory Development of the Department 

of Environmental Quality. The Department contact to access this information is the 

Director, Office of Air Regulatory Development.

The state did not receive testimony on this particular revision.

TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REG03

SIP\NONATTN PLANS\2008\E04-SIP-3.DOC
#### Ella L. Winton, *Respondent,*v. Walter W. Winton, Appellant.

Order modified by reducing alimony to twelve dollars per week, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.
Case No. 9,104.

#### MARRINER et al. v. LUTING.

[N. Y. Times.

Oct. 25, 1863.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

1863.

Contracts — Agreement on Interpretation — Es-toppel.

[An agreement as to the proper interpretation of a contract bars each party from thereafter claiming a construction inconsistent therewith.]

[This was a libel by'George W. Marriner and others against Charles Luting.]

This was an action to recover a balance of charter money. The vessel was, by the charter, to have <-a full cargo of molasses, with 10 per cent, on the number of pieces for small stowage.” The charterers did not furnish a full cargo, and on her arrival a dispute arose between the parties as to her capacity. They agreed to leave it to two stevedores to determine, and the stevedores made their report that she would carry 576 hogsheads, 20 tierces, and 56 barrels, and libellants presented a bill made out in that way. The respondent, however, was not satisfied with this award, and the parties met again. He claimed that she would not carry more than 552 hogsheads, and they finally agreed to split the difference on the hogsheads. The respondent, when the bill was again presented next morning, claimed that he should not pay freight on more than 564 hogsheads and 56 barrels, being 10 per cent, on the number of hogsheads. The libellants, however, claimed that they had agreed to settle the bill as it was now made out, deducting the twelve hogsheads agreed to be thrown off.

Beebe, Dean & Donohue, for libellants.

Benedict, Burr & Benedict, for respondent.

SHIPMAN, District Judge,

without hearing the counsel for the libellants said he was inclined to the opinion that the respondent was correct in his construction of the charter party, but that as he had not objected to the bill on that ground when first presented, the transaction between the parties was a fixing of the amount to be paid as in the bill stated, less the hogsheads to be deducted, and he gave a decree for the amount claimed by the libellants.
No. 54149.

#### Yee Sing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 958375-G, etc. (Los Angeles and San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Esther M. Van Hoevenberg, *Respondent, v.*The City of Kingston, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 28, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 28, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0148. CHARLES EDWARD GRAPER et al. v. CHRISTINA HOLZMAN.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

S15V048
NO. 07-01-0102-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JULY 25, 2001

	______________________________

	PAUL A. PHOMMYVONG AND DAOVONE PHOMMYVONG,

	INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF DECEASED DAUGHTER,

	LAURA PHOMMYVONG, APPELLANTS

	V.

	SERGIO MUNIZ, M.D., ET AL., APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 86,451-D; HONORABLE DON EMERSON, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	DISMISSAL

	By their notice of appeal, appellants Paul A. Phommyvong and Daovone Phommyvong, individually and on behalf of their deceased daughter Laura Phommyvong, attempt to appeal an Order Granting Motions for Summary Judgment signed February 20, 2001, granting the motions for summary judgment of some but not all of the defendants that appellants’ claims (plaintiffs below) be “hereby dismissed with prejudice.”  In response to this Court’s letter questioning jurisdiction, appellants filed a motion pursuant to Rule 27.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requesting that dismissal of this appeal be withheld for 45 days so that a final summary judgment could be prepared and filed in a supplemental record.  On April 27, 2001, appellants’ motion was granted with the proviso that failure to file the supplemental clerk’s record within 45 days of that date would result in dismissal of the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  To date no supplemental record containing a final summary judgment has been filed.

	Accordingly, we dismiss this purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

							Don H. Reavis

						    	    Justice

Do not publish.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 28, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-1775

Lower Tribunal No. 11-31114

________________

Florida Capital Group, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Bart S. Bishop,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, John

Schlesinger, Judge.

Akerman LLP, Kristen M. Fiore (Tallahassee) and Christopher S. Duke

(West Palm Beach), for appellant.

Damian & Valori, LLP, Melanie E. Damian, Mary Claire Espenkotter and

Allison J. Leonard, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, and LUCK, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.

Florida Capital Group, Inc. appeals the trial court’s order granting Bart S.

Bishop’s motion to vacate dismissal and entry of the final judgment confirming
payment of Bishop’s severance package awarded in arbitration. Because the final

judgment does not include the condition of approval contained in the arbitration

award, we reverse the final judgment. We affirm the vacatur of the dismissal order

without further discussion.

Pursuant to an arbitration agreement, Florida Capital, a bank holding

company, and Bishop, a former executive of Florida Capital, submitted a dispute to

the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) regarding Bishop’s severance

payment. The parties stipulated that the severance payment constituted a “golden

parachute payment,” as Florida Capital was deemed to be in a “troubled

condition.” See 12 C.F.R. § 359.1(f) (2011). AAA awarded payment of Bishop’s

severance, conditioned on Florida Capital obtaining the necessary approval from

the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and the Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). See 12 C.F.R. § 359.4 (2011).1

Upon motion to confirm and enforce the arbitration award, the trial court

entered the final judgment confirming payment but did not include the condition of

approval. Because the trial court did not modify or correct the award pursuant to

section 682.10 or section 682.14, Florida Statutes, or vacate the award pursuant to

1 On or about March 26, 2009, the OCC determined that Florida Capital was in a

“troubled condition,” as is defined by section 303.101(c), Code of Federal

Regulations. This designation requires approval of the OCC and the FDIC before a

golden parachute payment may be made.

2
section 682.13, Florida Statutes, see § 682.12, Fla. Stat. (2016), it was required to

“confirm the award as made,” see § 682.14(2), Fla. Stat. (2016).

Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand to the trial court

with instructions to enter final judgment in conformity with the award as made;

i.e., condition payment upon required approval from the OCC and the FDIC.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

3
SERVED: FEBRUARY 14, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SCOTTTICE FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0042

NOTICE OFASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012NE700211) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1 ONE COPY R. Bennett Sargent, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ANE-7 NewEngland Region Federal Aviation Administration 12 NewEnglandExecutive Park Burlington, MA 01821 · TEL: 781-238-7058 FAX: 781-238-7055 Scott Tice, Respondent 21125 Timberland Road Barronett, WI54813-9540 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0042 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. · · 

### -2-
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that,
to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                                                 
|------------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lisa F. Campbell                                                            
|                   |  |     |  | Lisa F. Campbell                                                                
|                   |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 255 ) ll-K - (I ) -6 8 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57AM Sheet 255of 325P. 2

II-K-(I)-6 8 INDUSTRIA L BOILE R NSP S IMPAC T ANALYSIS . SUMMAR Y O F SEVENT H ROUND TES T CASES . EEA , Inc . Octobe r 2 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-6 8
OFFICE OF THE A’ITORNEY GENERAL OF ?EXAG AUSTIN ‘.

‘:’ aahLm~~~ -o- - :.;

iDonorable Gco. U. Sheppard Co~ptrollcr Of mbl.iO.A~oouuts dustin, Tasaa

of'such fees rezaining on hrtnrl at the end ::;

;,.,.:'< of thiffkscal year, are hereby appropriated for the purpose of supervising employment BgOnOieS*~Section 4 ol IlcuseXl1 264, 43th Legislature, I

ail-'lots:;'thi

Septcdx9 I, 1943, 3Sl. maneys rcxxdn**inz in**  **such. special**  **fun2 (I?zploym?nt**  **&enog** 37X22) al3.i all JXueys tiicrcaPtcrPCCciVCd by the Corxissicner from liccnsa Pees under this Act shall bo 'paidinto ml beeGEm a 3art of ..'.. the General Wvenuc Z'uud."

In our opinion X0. C-3126, we callor attention to the legislative >ractioe, **n_npmring in**  **previous** appropriation bills, to measure tho Labor Cozxl.ssionerts authority.to draw **ag+inst** certain appro$riati.ons fro= the General Fund by the yardstick of t&o at;ountof fees he do;jositedto the or&it of-that J&md. ,~ The provisionsof the cumcnt itp3ropriation evi.de~m3a continuance 0P that praotice.~

Your attention is directed specifically to the quote;2rider. This rider appropristos, f’or e~cla fiscal year, from the~Genera1 Pun0 fanex.ouutequivalent to the amount,oP license foca~colleotod and depcsited to the ored& it cr the tlentfral Fund undetithe provisions of'House 3111. 234 durini the fisoirlyear, plus an amunt equivalent to that amount ubich would remin afim deducting at the and of the precediug fiscal year all~oxpenditures from the Gcnoral Fun2 for supervising emplcyzcnt agencies from the .total.foos deposited to the oredit Gf the CteneralFund. This appropriation is War the purpose af aupemisfns euployizentagencies.* It is not, as are the item listed above it, limited to an amount equivalent to part of the foes, but apprGl;riateaan avimmt equivalent to all the Pow. Yet the iteam ezbracc every expenditure that might be ninde*for the puPpose of supe~isin~ employment agen- .c.ies ." Z&ore.is, then, a conflict **betiioen** the rider and the itetizations which cnmot be rccnricilckl. In such case, the rider, being last in **point** oF position,-rust be rcgarded as the lzst expressian OP the legislative will, and sugerseclcs tho itWzation esoopt in the Toll0v-J.n~ rospcctr Items 16 md 17 control arxlPis the naximm salaries which cau bo.prrLdfron the appropriation pmvidod in the rider to tha Supervisor and **AssSntant** +%qcrv%sor. (me Senate3Bill ~333,Acts 43th Ee~ialaturo), .~ ;
.

.

### Trustingthat thefor~oin:: 

### sotb3faotorily

. ..'., anslpers

your question,we are‘

Very trulyyour8

-. : : :..

_.:.:: . ,.". i., :
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8717 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.8717

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 20 West Main Street in Santaquin, Utah, as the ``SGT Bill Hooser Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SGT BILL HOOSER POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 20 West Main Street in Santaquin, Utah, shall be known and 
designated as the ``SGT Bill Hooser Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``SGT Bill 
Hooser Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```