alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                   SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(A) CERTIFICATION

I, E. Edward Ahrens, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this year-end report on Form 10-KSB of eAcceleration Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this year-end report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this year-end report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this year-end report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this year-end report is being prepared;

         b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this year-end report (the "Evaluation Date") based on such
evaluation.

         c)  presented in this year-end report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
year-end report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 23, 2004                        /s/ E. Edward Ahrens
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         E. Edward Ahrens
                                         Chief Financial Officer
Case No. 15,149.

#### UNITED STATES v. FOUR HUNDRED BASKETS OF CHAMPAGNE.

[Nowhere reported: opinion not now accessible.]
No. 40266.

#### Protest 799907-G of B. Altman & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of outerwear in chief value of wool similar to that involved in *United States*v. *International Clearing House*(24 C. C. P. A. 117, T. D. 48416). The claim under paragraph 1114 was therefore sustained.
file:///W|/RULES/In-Process%20Reviews/ANTELOPE%20VALLEY%201515-10/1515-10%20461a/District%20Email.htm

From: Tracy Walters [twalters@mdaqmd.ca.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:05 AM 

To: Au, Patrick@ARB 

Cc: Steckel.Andrew@epamail.epa.gov; Alan De Salvio; Bret Banks; Vickie Rausch 

Subject: Amendment of AVAQMD 461 Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing 

Attachments: AV461 clean d2.doc; AV461 clean d2.pdf; 461 SRFinal.pdf; 461_8-19-08 minute.PDF; 

461_9-16-08 cancel.PDF; 461_10-21-08 minute.PDF; 461_reso.PDF; Rule Evaluation.doc; SIP 

Checklist.doc 

On October 21, 2008 the Governing Board of the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management 

District (AVAQMD) amended Rule 461- Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing. Attached for your 

review are the following documents pertaining to the adoption:

* Rule 461, clean version (word/pdf)

* Rule 461, iterated versions (included in Staff Report Appendix A)

* Final Staff Report

* Proof of Publication (included in Staff Report, Appendix B)

* Signed Notice of Exemption, Los Angeles County (included in Staff Report, 

Appendix D)

* Set Date Minute Item, August 19, 2008 Official Copy

* Cancellation Notice September 16, 2008

* Set Date Minute Item, October 21, 2008 Official Copy

* Resolution 08-08, Official Copy

* CARB Rule Evaluation Form

* SIP Completeness Checklist

This Rule is included in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and therefore requires submission to 

USEPA.

Thank you for your assistance. Please don't hesitate to contact me if I can provide any additional 

information.

Tracy Walters

Air Quality Specialist

(760) 245-1661 x 6122

twalters@mdaqmd.ca.gov

file:///W|/RULES/In-Process%20Reviews/ANTELOPE%20VALLEY%201515-10/1515-10%20461a/District%20Email.htm [3/17/2009 10:01:48 AM]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.32



                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                           GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION
                          1999 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS'
                                STOCK OPTION PLAN

         WHEREAS, GTECH Holdings Corporation (the "Corporation") adopted the
GTECH Holdings Corporation 1999 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan (the
"Plan") as a means whereby the Corporation may, through the grant of
non-qualified stock options to purchase common stock of the Corporation to
Non-Employee Directors, attract and retain capable outside directors;

         WHEREAS, the Plan may be amended by resolution of the Board of
Directors of the Corporation (the "Board") in accordance with Section 9 of the
Plan;

         WHEREAS, the Board has by resolution authorized the amendment of the
Plan to extend the term of the options granted under the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         1. Section 6 (c) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

                  (c) Term. Subject to earlier termination as provided in
         Sections 6(e), (f) and (g) and in Section 8 hereof, the term of each
         option shall be ten (10) years from the date of grant.

         2. Except as amended above, the Plan remains in full force and effect
and is in all other respects ratified and confirmed.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has executed this First Amendment
as of the ____ day of __________, 2001.


                                            GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION



                                            By:
                                              ----------------------------------
                                            Title:
                                                 -------------------------------
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

In connection with the Annual Report of China New Borun Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bing Yu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 16, 2011

 
|   | /s/ Bing Yu                                |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Bing Yu                              |
|   | Title:   Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Tessera Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bruce M.
McWilliams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce M. McWilliams              
|Bruce M. McWilliams                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 10, 2007                      

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tessera Technologies, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ending
July 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Charles A. Webster, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles A. Webster                              
|Charles A. Webster                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|August 10, 2007
Exhibit 10.5





                           NOTE PAYABLE

                           By and between
                International Mercantile Corporation
                              And
                     Red River Trading Company


This note payable is effective this 7th day of September, 1999, by and
between International Mercantile Corporation, a Missouri corporation
(the Buyer) and Red River Trading Company, Inc., a Maryland corporation
(the Seller).

Red River Trading Company has entered into a sales agreement with
International Mercantile Corporation for tangible personal property as
reflected in the attached bill of sale.  The total purchase price of
said property being $150,000.  Both parties agree to the following
payment terms:
        Annual Payment:   $25,000 plus accrued interest
        Interest Rate:    8.0% compounded annually
        Payment Dates:    January of each year, beginning January 2000.
        Term:             Six (6 ) years


All property is sold in as is condition.


For:     Red River Trading Company, Inc.  (Seller)


/s/Timothy Jewell                                       ----------
By:  Timothy Jewell, President                                Date



For:     International Mercantile Corporation (Buyer)


/s/Frederic Richardson                                  ---------
By:  Frederic Richardson, Chairman                      Date
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-K of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2004, I, William K. Beauchesne, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc.


 /s/ William K. Beauchesne
----------------------------------------
William K. Beauchesne
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 56532.

protests 149008-K and 145439-K (New York).

#### Gordon Fabrics Co. and Schlesinger *&*Gintel, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the involved merchandise consist of woven fabrics in the piece, wholly of silk, bleached, and valued at more than $5.50 per pound, the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Walter Strassburger & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(26 Cust. Ct. 210, C. D. 1326). The claim of the plaintiffs was therefore sustained.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0502 Directorate ID : 2010 - SW - 097 - AD Appliance/Helicopter Model: Aeronautical Accessories, Inc.; Agusta S.p.A. Model AB412 and AB412EP; and Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Model 205A, 205A - 1, 205B, 212, 412, 412CF, and 412EP Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 115 Helicopters in the US Registry. Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of a crosstube, collapse of the landing gear, and subsequ ent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 9,315 (replacing a crosstube) Labor per Helicopter ( 0.5 x $ 8 5 /work- hour for the historical card) (8.5 x $85/work- hour for the prep and inspection) ( 1 x $85/work- hour for the dimensiona l inspection) ( 24 x $85/work- hour for the fluorescent penetrant inspection ) (10 x $85/work- hour for replacing a crosstube) $ 42 $722 per cycle $85 per cycle $ 2,040 per cycle $850 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ Total US Fleet Cost $ Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a signi ficant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Michael Kohner
November 29, 1977

#### In the Matter of Doran (People v Doran).

(Docket No. 58698.)

*Frank J. Kelley,*Attorney General, *Robert A. Derengoski,*Solicitor General, and *John A. Wilson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the people.

Rehearing denied.

State Appellate Defender for defendant-appellant. Reported at 401 Mich 235.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### National Communications System 

          - [Docket No. NCS-2007-0001] 

# AGENCY:

National Communications System, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Partially Closed Advisory Committee Meeting; Notice of Cancellation. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Agency is issuing this notice to cancel a meeting by teleconference of the President's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC). This meeting was originally announced in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 15, 2007.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Kelvin Coleman, 703-235-5643. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The March 29, 2007, National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee teleconference has been cancelled. This meeting was originally announced in the                     **Federal Register**                     of March 15, 2007, in FR Doc 15mr07-70, on page 12179, in the second column.                 

Dated: March 26, 2007. 

Arnella Terrell, 

Federal Register Certification Official.

[FR Doc. E7-5830 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-10-P
#### F. W. Berk & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6322.

Entry No. 712683.

Invoice dated Manchester, England, October 10, 1944.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 21, 1944.

*285(Decided August 15, 1946)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me on the following written stipulation:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between the attorneys for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise, consisting of crude ammonium sulphocyanide, and the issues in this appeal to reappraisement, are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues decided in *F. W. Berk & Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*Reappraisement No. 154927-A, Reap. Dec. 6282, wherein the court said: “The limited issue, resulting from counsel’s agreement, makes it unnecessary to consider statutory foreign value, export value or United States value, the discussion herein being confined to cost of production, section 402 (f)” of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that 4.02 pence per pound, net packed, is the cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f), the Tariff Act of 1930, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that this appeal to reappraisement may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I hold as matter of law that cost of production, section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (f)) is the proper basis for appraisement of the crude ammonium sulphocyanide in question, and that such statutory value is 4.02 pence per pound, net packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
|   | **Exhibit 32.1** |
|--------|------------------|

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Calypso Media Services Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, **Michael D. Parnell**, Chief Executive Officer and Principal            Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ | **MICHAELD.PARNELL** |
|-----|----------------------|

 

**Michael D. Parnell**

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer

April 15, 2010

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or            its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8841 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

114 Center Street East in Roseau, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Floyd B. Olson 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2024 

Mrs. FISCHBACH (for herself, Mr. FINSTAD, Mr. EMMER, Mr. STAUBER, Ms. 

CRAIG, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. PHILLIPS, and Ms. OMAR) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 114 Center Street East in Roseau, Minnesota, 

as the ‘‘Floyd B. Olson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLOYD B. OLSON POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 114 Center Street East in 

6 Roseau, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Floyd B. Olson Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8841 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Floyd B. Olson Post 

5 Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB