SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: Pennsylvania Department of Environment al Protection

Date Submitted: July 15, 2014 Subject: Section 128 (State Boards ) for all pollutants

Completeness Review Completed by: Ruth Knapp Date Completed: 8/14/14

Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision

thereof. 1. Letter dated July 1 5 , 201 4 from E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary

, Pennsylvania Department of Environment al

Protection to Shawn Garvin Regional Administrator.

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/i ssuance date. 2. Yes

, the applicable portions of 65 Pa.C.S Chapter 11 were enacted on October 15, 1998, and became effective 60 days

later

.

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. Yes

, Pennsylvania has the authority pursuant to the Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control Act, 35 P.S. Sections 4001

- 4015

.

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 4. Yes, a copy of 65 Pa.C.S Chapter 11, with certain portions

redacted, was included in the submittal.EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. Yes, the cover letter transmitting the SIP revision is dated July 15, 2014 , and copies of the public heari ng notices are provided.

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. Yes, public notice was provided on May 3 , 201 4 i n the PA Bulletin as well as various newspapers announcing a public comment period from May 3, 2014 to June 6, 2014 with the opportunity to request a public hearing; no request was made

.

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance

with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. N/A, no request for public hearing was made

.

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response

thereto. 8. Yes, public comments were received and PADEP responded

to those comments

.

Technical Support

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. N/A, the submittal requests the addition of regulations to the SIP pertaining to conflict of interests of PADEP employees for

CAA section 128.

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including

the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. Yes, the regulations apply throughout the Commonwealth.

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions

from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipa ted as a result

of the revision. 3. N/A. No changes in the emissions will occur as a result of

this revision.EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemente d. 4. N/A, this revision is an administrative action and will not

affect emissions in the Commonwealth.

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. N/A , this revision is an administrative action an d does not require any modeling.

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 6. N/A, this revision is an administrative action and does not require any emission limitations.

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 7. N/A, this revision is an administrative action and does not require any emission limits, work practice standards, or recordkeeping requirements.

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 8. N/A, this revision is an administrative action and does not require any compliance strategies

.

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 9

. N/A

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. N/A