alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

Certifications

I, Richard A. Boone, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Rhino Resource Partners LP;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 18, 2011

/s/ RICHARD A. BOONE Richard A. Boone Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE
QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-Q
TO BE FILED UNDER SECTIONS 13 AND 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, AS AMENDED I, Charles M. Baughn, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hines Real Estate
Investment Trust, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. /s/ CHARLES M. BAUGHNCharles M. BaughnChief Executive Officer Date: August 16, 2004
No. 40272.

#### Protests 866606-G, etc., of Robert Kreitlow et al. (Pembina, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 31.1



I, Nicholas S. Schorsch, certify that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2012 of Business Development Corporation of America;



|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



| | 
| | 



|     
|-----
|     
|Date:
|     
|
#### GEORGE W. KIDD, Respondent, *v.*WILLIAM CURRY, Appellant.

*Vacation of a judgment after it has been paid*— *remedies of the judgment debtor.*

Where, after the amount due upon a judgment has been collected under an execution issued thereon, the judgment is vacated and set aside, the judgment-debtor may either apply for an order for the return of the money so paid, under section 1323 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or may bring an action to recover it.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Kings county in favor of the plaintiff.

The defendant recovered a judgment on August 29,1878, against the plaintiff for $122.88, upon which he issued an fexecution and collected the sum of $182, being the whole amount due thereon, with poundage, etc. On June 20, 1879, this judgment was vacated and set aside. The plaintiff then, after demand, brought this action against the defendant and obtained a judgment for the amount so paid under the execution, with costs. From this last-named judgment the defendant appealed to the General Term.

*E.* J.*Morris, for the appellant.

*T. J. & B. F.*Tilney, for the respondent.

Barnard, P. J.:

There is no basis for this appeal. The defendant obtained a judgment against the plaintiff and collected it by execution. The judgment was *“*subsequently vacated and set aside.” The defendant therefore holds the plaintiff’s money without any right to retain the same. An action lies to enforce its repayment. *(Clark*v. *216
      *Pinney,*6 Cow., 299; *Sturges v. Allis,*10 Wend., 354.) It does not even appear that a new trial was ordered. Upon an application for restitution by order, made to the court, equitable considerations may arise and conditions be put upon the restitution in reference to the safe keeping of money collected.

The money, upon a new trial, may .still belong to the creditor, but as against an action there is no legal defense.

The remedy is either by motion (Code C. P., § 1823) or by action. *(Lott*v. *Swezey,*29 Barb., 88.)

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Dykman and Cullen, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of G2 Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Gust Kepler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Gust Kepler        
|Gust Kepler            
|Chief Executive Officer
|July 31, 2009          

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2

         Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Barry Thomas, and CEO of Silver Screen Studios, Inc., a Georgia
corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section
906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this
quarterly report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934:

Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ended Sept. 30, 2006.


The undersigned certifies that the above periodic report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of Silver Screen Studios, Inc. and results of
its operations.

By:/s/ Barry Thomas
   ----------------
Barry Thomas, CEO and  Director

November 12, 2006
[No. 18206.

Department Two.

January 31, 1894.]

#### J. H. BROWN, Appellant, *v.*FRESNO RAISIN COMPANY, Respondent.

Partnership—Individual Liability or Partnership.—A partner may contract on his own account, and make himself alone liable for property bought for the partnership, if the vendor choose to accept such individual liability.

Id.—Counterclaim.—In an individual action by a plaintiff who was a member of a partnership, the defendant may counterclaim the individual liability of the plaintiff for goods sold and delivered for the partnership upon the individual credit of the plaintiff.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

*L. L. Cory,*for Appellant.

*George E. Church,*for Respondent.

De Haven, J.

The defendant recovered a judgment for one hundred and four dollars and forty-five cents, balance due upon a counterclaim, and the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff was a member of the firm of Brown and May, and there was evidence from which the court was justified in finding that the raisins delivered by the defendant to that firm were sold and delivered upon the individual credit of the plaintiff, and this being so the finding of the court that such goods were sold and delivered by defendant to the plaintiff, and that the counterclaim of defendant was established, cannot be disturbed ; for it is well settled that a partner may contract on his own account, and make himself alone liable, for the property bought for the copartnership if the vendor choose to accept such individual liability. (1 Bindley on Partnership, 2d Am. ed., 179-92; *Sylvester*v. *Smith,*9 Mass. 119.)

*223We discover no error in the rulings of the court in relation to the admission of evidence.

Judgment and order affirmed.

McFarland, J., and Fitzgerald, J., concurred.
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Harbor Island Development Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Ross, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Donald Ross By: Donald Ross Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  Dated: February 16, 2012  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)







Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted),
John L. McManus, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aeolus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:







1.   This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
(the “Report”) to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and





2.   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Report.







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request.






This
certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act
(whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.







Date:
August 27, 2010





/s/ John L. McManus  John L.
McManus


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)








Date:
August 27, 2010





/s/ John L. McManus  John L.
McManus


Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6212]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Economics and Statistics Administration


Bureau of Economic Analysis Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Economics and Statistics 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 
as amended by Pub. L. 94-409, Pub. L. 96-523, Pub. L. 97-375 and Pub. 
L. 105-153), we are announcing a meeting of the Bureau of Economic 
Analysis Advisory Committee. The meeting's agenda focuses on the 
various aspects involved with the measurement of health care in the 
national economic accounts.

DATES: Friday, May 4, 2007, the meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and 
adjourn at approximately 3:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Bureau of Economic 
Analysis at 1441 L St., NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dorothy Andrake, Communications 
Division Chief, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230; telephone number: (202) 606-9630.
    Public Participation: This meeting is open to the public. Because 
of security procedures, anyone planning to attend the meeting must 
contact Dorothy Andrake of BEA at (202) 606-9630 in advance. The 
meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests 
for foreign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be 
directed to Dorothy Andrake at (202) 606-9630.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee was established September 2, 
1999. The Committee advises the Director of BEA on matters related to 
the development and improvement of BEA's national, regional, industry, 
and international economic accounts, especially in areas of new and 
rapidly growing economic activities arising from innovative and 
advancing technologies, and provides recommendations from the 
perspectives of the economics profession, business, and government. 
This will be the Committee's fifteenth meeting.

    Dated: March 26, 2007.
J. Steven Landefeld,
Director, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
[FR Doc. E7-6212 Filed 4-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-06-P
#### In the Matter of Sarah Bartholf v. Alfred Carr, Ex’r, etc.

Motion for re-argument granted.
No. 64260.

protest 59/16748 (New York)

#### Charles R. Gracie & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

*495Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Shoji panels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United Enterprises et al.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 73, C.D. 2023), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
September 16, 1954

Reap. Dec. 8333.

#### Charles *Stockheimer, Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States.*

Reap. Dec. 8277. Motion by defendant.
## MAP SHOWING ALPINE DEBRIS FLOWS TRIGGERED BY A JULY 28, 1999 THUNDERSTORM IN THE CENTRAL FRONT RANGE OF COLORADO

*By***Jonathan W. Godt *and* Jeffrey A. Coe**
**U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-050**

**Version 1.0**
The text of this report is presented here in Portable Document Format. The latest    version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required to view it.    If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat Reader free of charge,    click here .
OFR-03-050 Map PDF File (43.37 MB)OFR-03-050 Text PDF File (48 KB)  (This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.) 

**Having problems viewing the large file? Try downloading the file.**    For instructions on how to download files from the internet, click here.

Metadata File for the debris-flow polygons    (13 KB)Metadata File for the debris-flow initiation locations(11KB)

Download Arc/Info Export Files
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2003/ofr-03-050/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Sat Jan 12 23:00 EDT 2013
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2004 of Evergreen Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers does hereby certify that to the best of his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and
          result of operations of the Company.

| | Date:   January 18, 2005 | /s/ Timothy G. Wahlberg
| | ------------------------ | -----------------------
| | Timothy G. Wahlberg     
| | President               

| | Date:   January 18, 2005 | /s/ John A. Irwin
| | ------------------------ | -----------------
| | John A. Irwin           
| | Chief Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
(Reap. Dec. 9210)

#### F. L. Kraemer & Co., for a/c Naftone, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 784111; 784112.

(Decided August 13, 1958)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above-mentioned appeals for reappraisement consists of Antioxidant 4010, imported from Germany, and that said merchandise was appraised on a United States Value, as defined under the provisions of Section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, at $1,424 per lb., net weight packed.

> *518IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise here involved, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Germany and that there was no foreign value or export value as defined in Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

> - IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the correct United States Value for said Antioxidant 4010, as defined in Section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended was $1.3504 per lb. net weight packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals are abandoned as to any other merchandise listed on the invoices, and that these appeals may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the United States value, as that value is defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by-section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the Antioxidant 4010 here involved, and that such value was $1.3504 per pound, net weight packed.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.