alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.27




                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO

                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF

                            CLASSIC OF OKLAHOMA, INC.


         It is hereby certified that:

         1. The name of the corporation is Classic of Oklahoma, Inc. (the
"Corporation").

         2. The Article 1 of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                  1. Name. The name of the corporation is Classic Cable of
                  Oklahoma, Inc. (the "Corporation").

         3. The amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein certified
has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228 and 241
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         Signed and attested to on February 2, 2000.


                                   CLASSIC OF OKLAHOMA, INC.


                                   By: /s/ STEVEN E. SEACH
                                       --------------------------------------
                                            Steven E. Seach, President
Attest:

/s/ BRYAN NOTEBOOM
----------------------------
Bryan Noteboom, Secretary
To : Cc: Bcc: Subject: Fw:Reply to question regarding 2009 Neuroepidemiology paper on lead and mental

development

From: myjedryc@cyf-kr.edu.pl To: Molini Patel/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 06/16/2011 06:46 AM Subject: Re: question regarding 2009 Neuroepidemiology paper on lead and mental development

Dear Mollini, Blood Pb levels in the paper mentioned were log10 t ransformed With kindest regards Wieslaw

.................

Dear Dr. Jedrychowski, > We are in the process of developing the Integrate d Science Assessment for > Lead as part of US EPA's review of the National Ambient Air Quality > Standards. Our assessment of neurodevelopmental effects in children > includes examination of blood lead concentration- response relationships.
> > In the 2009 Neuroepidemiology paper on lead and m ental development in > children (Jedrychowski et al., 2009. Very low prenatal exposure to lead > and mental development of children in infancy and early childhood: Krakow
> prospective cohort study

. Neuroepidemiology . 2009;32(4):270-8.), it was > indicated that cord blood Pb levels were log-tran sformed.
> > Would you please let us know whether blood Pb lev els were log10 or natural > log transformed? This information will help us i n our comparisons of > effect estimates across studies. Thank you for y our attention.
> > Sincerely,
> > Molini M. Patel, PhD, MPH > Epidemiologist > U.S. Environmental Protection Agency > National Center for Environmental Assessment > Mail drop: B243-01 > Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 > Telephone: (919) 541-1492 > Email: patel.molini@epa.gov
# 0 TESORO Charles S. Parrish Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary ^ !.. 

## 2013SEP 17 AMi1 : 40

^, ^ U F!^C C':- 

## EXtCUTi'vE Sv:: - _ ;;^r^iAT Tesoro Corporation 19100 Ridgewood Parkway San Antonio, TX 78259 210 626 4280 210 745 4494 Fax 

## September 13, 2013 The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N W Washington, DC 20460 Re: Tesoro Corporation's Petition for Waiver of 2014 Applicable Volumes of the Renewable Fuel Standard Dear Administrator McCarthy: Pursuant to § 211(o)(7)(A) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o)(7)(A), and for the reasons set forth in the August 13, 2013 Petition for Partial Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Mandate Wavier submitted to your office by the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) and the American Petroleum Institute (API), Tesoro Corporation (Tesoro) submits this petition for a waiver of the 2014 applicable volumes of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). As noted in the August 13, 2013 Petition, EPA must take action to avoid the adverse consequences that the RFS blendwall will have on the national fuel market. Tesoro is a regulated party and is subject to the requirements of the RFS program. As such, Tesoro hereby incorporates into this petition, in its entirety, the AFPM and API's Petition for Partial RFS Mandate Wavier, dated August 13, 2013. As demonstrated by the August 13, 2013 Petition, the current 2014 applicable volumes of the RFS will severely harm the economy or environment of the United States and will result in an inadequate domestic supply of gasoline and diesel fuel. Tesoro respectfully requests that EPA grant this petition for wavier of the 2014 applicable volumes of the RFS. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Mr. Stoney Vining of my staff at (210) 626-4122. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,



## Charles S. Parrish EVP, General Counsel & Secretary

# a KA`rHRml RISEIi 0.0 LBS LTR 1 OF 1 210-626-6673 TE.SURO COMPAPJIES, INC. 19100 RIDGEWOOD PARKWAY SAN APJTONIO TX 782591828 

### SHIP TO: ^ 

### HONORABLE GINA MCCARTHY UNITED STATES EPA 1200 PF.NNSYI,VANIA AVENUE, NW 

## WASHINGTON DC 20460-0001 i I ( 

# MD 241 9-83 

# } { 4rs {^, { '.^ {S

.

y,'^? ;' : }^ r ' ' SS^ } ^ t^ ?} • 

## UPS NEXT DAY AIR I TRACKING #: 1Z 772 40$ Ol 9753 3899 i

i ^

BILLING: P,/P

Company Nurober: 0100 ® Cost Center: 97501 ^ GS 15,6.72, Wfv'7'IE8042,pA 07/2073 ^ ^ 

# ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ U ^ 

### ^ ^ ^ ^ 0 

# ^ 

# ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 

## .^

c^ ^ ., ^ -^

- 

### o ^

>^.. ^ ^ ^ 

### .^
if .^
G ^..^ ^ .^J ^

^ ^ 

# W 

# N O W
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6558

DENNIS M. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

PAT CHAVIS; ALVIN KELLER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:12-hc-02235-F)

Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: June 23, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis W. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, 

III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis M. Williams seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) 

petition and he has filed an application to proceed in forma 

pauperis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny Williams’ application to proceed in forma pauperis, deny

a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2007296EN.01001001.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/10

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to national regional investment aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 296/09)

| Aid No | XR 49/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Austria |
| Region | Niederösterreich |
| Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement | Spezielle Richtlinien des Niederösterreichischen Wirtschafts- und Tourismusfonds für die Förderung von Investitionen sowie — als integrierter Bestandteil — die Allgemeinen Richtlinien des Niederösterreichischen Wirtschafts- und Tourismusfonds |
| Legal basis | Niederösterreichisches Wirtschafts- und Tourismusfondsgesetz 7300 in der jeweils gültigen Fassung |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Annual budget | EUR 23,5 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | 15 % |
| In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1.1.2007 |
| Duration | 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for regional investment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Niederösterreichischer Wirtschafts- und Tourismusfonds beim Amt der NÖ Landesregierung, Abteilung Wirtschaft, Tourismus und Technologie, Abt. WST3 |
| Landhausplatz 1, Haus 14 EG |
| A-3109 St. Pölten |
| Tel: (43-2742) 900 51 61 01 |
| E-mail: www.wirtschaftsfoerderung.at |

Aid No

XR 49/07

Member State

Austria

Region

Niederösterreich

Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement

ad hoc

Spezielle Richtlinien des Niederösterreichischen Wirtschafts- und Tourismusfonds für die Förderung von Investitionen sowie — als integrierter Bestandteil — die Allgemeinen Richtlinien des Niederösterreichischen Wirtschafts- und Tourismusfonds

Legal basis

Niederösterreichisches Wirtschafts- und Tourismusfondsgesetz 7300 in der jeweils gültigen Fassung

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Annual budget

EUR 23,5 million

Maximum aid intensity

15 %

In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1.1.2007

Duration

31.12.2013

Economic sectors

All sectors eligible for regional investment aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Niederösterreichischer Wirtschafts- und Tourismusfonds beim Amt der NÖ Landesregierung, Abteilung Wirtschaft, Tourismus und Technologie, Abt. WST3

Landhausplatz 1, Haus 14 EG

A-3109 St. Pölten

Tel: (43-2742) 900 51 61 01

E-mail: www.wirtschaftsfoerderung.at

Internet address of the publication of the aid scheme

http://www.wirtschaftsfoerderung.at/fs_downloads.htm

Other information

—

---
Exhibit 31 (b)**CERTIFICATION**I, Craig D. Abolt, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MSW Energy Holdings LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 15, 2005       By: /s/ Craig D. Abolt       Craig D. Abolt  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 51093.

#### Protests 58751-K, etc., of Soeldner-Heyman Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance w'ith stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewitn it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the dayfof exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
#### PEOPLE v MOORE

Docket No. 60462.

Decided June 5, 1978.

On application by the people for leave to appeal the Supreme Court, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals.

John E. Moore was convicted by a jury in Saginaw Circuit Court, Hazen R. Armstrong, J., of obliterating the identifying number of a firearm upon proof that he had been in possession of a handgun on which the number was obliterated. The prosecution relied on the statutory presumption that a person in possession of such a firearm is guilty of altering the number and did not produce any other evidence that the defendant had obliterated the number. The Court of Appeals, Danhof, C.J., and T. M. Burns and Keyes, JJ., reversed on the ground that the statutory presumption denied the defendant due process of law (Docket No. 30361). The people apply for leave to appeal. *Held:*

The Court of Appeals correctly found the statutory presumption unconstitutional.

Affirmed.

78 Mich App 565; 261 NW2d 3 (1977) affirmed.

*Frank J. Kelley,*Attorney General, *Robert A. Derengoski,*Solicitor General, *Robert L. Kaczmarek,*Prosecuting Attorney, and *Peter C. Jensen,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

*George E. Thick*and *George C. Bush*for defendant.

Per Curiam.

The prosecutor has applied for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals decision holding unconstitutional the provision of MCLA 750.230; MSA 28.427,1 which makes the possession *539of a firearm on which identifying numbers have been altered or obliterated presumptive evidence that the possessor has altered or obliterated the identifying numbers. 78 Mich App 565; 261 NW2d 3 (1977).

The prosecution produced evidence that the defendant was in possession of a handgun on which the identifying numbers had been obliterated. There was no evidence that defendant did the obliterating, and the prosecution relied on the statutory presumption. The defendant was found guilty by the jury. The Court of Appeals held that use of the statutory presumption denied the defendant due process of law.

We have reviewed the issues raised in the prosecutor’s application and conclude that the Court of Appeals correctly found the statutory presumption unconstitutional.

Pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Kavanagh, C.J., and Williams, Levin, Coleman, Fitzgerald, Ryan, and Blair Moody, Jr., JJ., concurred.

1

 At the time of the charged offense, the statute provided:

"Any person who shall wilfully alter, remove or obliterate the name of the maker, model, manufacturer’s number or other mark of *539identity of any pistol, shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 2 years or fine of not more than 1,000 dollars. Possession of any such firearm upon which the number shall have been altered, removed or obliterated, shall be presumptive evidence that such possessor has altered, removed or obliterated the same.”

The statute was amended by 1976 PA 32; however, the amendments do not affect the issues raised in this case.
#### Annis W. Hogeboom, *Appellant, v.*Nathan C. Hogeboom, *Respon*dent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6574

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TION KIMBROUGH,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cr-00220-REP-1)

Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: October 15, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tion Kimbrough, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tion Kimbrough appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Kimbrough, No. 3:09-cr-00220-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2018). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1-900 JACKPOT, INC. (FORMERLY PULTRONEX CORPORATION)
                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph  Batty,  solely for the purpose of  complying  with 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
hereby  certify  that to my  knowledge  Annual  Report  of 1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.
(formerly  Pultronex  Corporation)  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31,
2002 ("Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such
Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of 1-900 Jackpot, Inc. (formerly Pultronex Corporation).



DATE:  NOVEMBER 22, 2005

/S/ JOSEPH BATTY
------------------------
    JOSEPH BATTY
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-361-000]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing and Firm 
Transportation Service Agreements

March 28, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 26, 2007, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El 
Paso) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1A, Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 2 to become 
effective April 26, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#71373423323e1f1d181f14220401011e030531171403125f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a2c2f382925040603040f391f1a1a05181e2a0c0f1809440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6105 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>