alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GEORGE DENTON MARTIN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 47 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2018, the Application for Bail is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-QSB filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                        |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ John Q. Shaw, Jr.                
|                        |  |     |  | John Q. Shaw, Jr.                    
|                        |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

of Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted by Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned chief financial officer of Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/  Jamie L. Buskill

Jamie L. Buskill

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC

July 29, 2005
No. 53097.

#### Edgar S. Bibas, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 57931-K, etc. (New York).

*301Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SP Bancorp, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 March 29, 2011
Date
    
    /s/ Suzanne C. Salls

Suzanne C. SallsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 49292.

#### Protests 53838-K, etc., of L. Batlin & Son et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of G2 Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 22, 2009 (the Report), I, Gust Kepler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Gust Kepler        
|Gust Kepler            
|Chief Executive Officer
|April 22, 2009         

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8841 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8841

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 114 Center Street East in Roseau, Minnesota, as the ``Floyd B. Olson 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLOYD B. OLSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 114 Center Street East in Roseau, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Floyd B. Olson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Floyd B. 
Olson Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 8841

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 114 Center Street East in Roseau, Minnesota, as the ``Floyd B. Olson 
                             Post Office''.
```
#### James R. Turner, *Respondent, v.*Fire Insurance Company of Philadelphia, *Appellant.*

— Order affirmed. Opinion *Per Curiam.*
August 24, 1942

No. 47475.

#### Protest 35653-K of Goggi Bros., Inc.

C. D. 643. Government’s application for rehearing granted.
OPEN DOOR ONLINE, INC.
                      (FORMERLY GENESIS MEDIA GROUP, INC.)
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE


For the year ended December 31:                            1999          1998
                                                        ---------     ---------

Income (Loss) as reported                               $(606,058)    $ (13,948)

Income tax expense                                             --            --
                                                        ---------     ---------
Net income (loss)                                       $(606,058)    $ (13,948)
                                                        =========     =========

Basic earnings per share                                $   (0.11)    $  (13.95)
                                                        =========     =========

Diluted earnings per share                              $   (0.11)    $  (13.95)
                                                        =========     =========

Weighted average shares outstanding:                    5,432,863         1,000
                                                        =========     =========

 Fully diluted average shares outstanding:              5,432,863         1,000
                                                        =========     =========
No. 59092.

protest 219703-K (San Francisco).

#### Westco Liquor Products Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155) and *United States*v. *The Josebra Company*(41 C. C. P. A. 206, C. A. D. 552), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP07-23-002]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Cancellation of 
Rate Schedule X-27

March 29, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 14, 2007, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, the following changes to its tariff, effective February 27, 
2007:

Second Revised Volume No. 1
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 4
Original Volume No. 2
Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 2
First Revised Sheet No. 283

    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a 
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7a1a2b5a4a8898b8e8982b4929797889593a781829584c9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="05434057464a6b696c6b60567075756a777145636077662b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 13, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-6204 Filed 4-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
January 7, 2000



Mr. William Kraemer
MCNIC Pipeline & Processing Company
170 West Jefferson, Suite 1900

Detroit, MI 48226

         Re:      Additional Costs

Dear Bill:

Crown Asphalt Ridge L.L.C. ("CAR") has incurred the costs set forth in the
attached Exhibit "A" (the "Additional Costs"). Crown Asphalt Corporation
("Crown"), in its capacity as a member of CAR, is not able at this time to
contribute its proportionate share of the Additional Costs. Crown understands it
will be considered a Delinquent Member solely with regard to its proportionate
amount of Additional Capital Contributions actually used to pay the Additional
Costs, but shall not be deemed to be in breach of the LLC Agreement, as defined
below, as a result of such status. MCNIC agrees, as the Non-Defaulting Member,
to advance Crown's proportionate share of the Additional Costs as provided in
Section 3.6(a)(ii) of the CAR Operating Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1997
(the "LLC Agreement"). The Additional Capital Contributions advanced to CAR by
MCNIC will be designated as a Capital Contribution and will be subject to the
terms and conditions of Section 3.6(a)(ii)(B) of the LLC Agreement. As a result,
as provided in Section 3.6(a)(ii)(B), Crown, as the Delinquent Member, will have
its Sharing Ratio reduced and MCNIC, as the Non-Defaulting Member, will have its
Sharing Ratio increased to reflect the fact that MCNIC has made the Additional
Capital Contributions as agreed by the parties as reflected on Exhibit "A".
Terms not specifically defined within this Letter shall have those meanings
given them by the LLC Agreement.

Sincerely,

/s/ Jay Mealey
-------------------
Jay Mealey
President

cc:  Lorin Patterson
No. 50546.

#### Protest 63415-K of Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801),' which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOEL ANTHONY HOLLEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2708 LKK PAN P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner without counsel seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983. On September 9, 2005, plaintiff filed two documents styled, “Motion for Order

Compelling Discovery,” which became numbers 22 and 23 on the docket. These motions are

identical.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court will disregard number 23. 

DATED: May 10, 2006.

\\004

\ holl2708.disregard as duplicative

Case 2:04-cv-02708-LKK -EFB Document 32 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 1
Case No. 6,809.

#### HOYT v. The JOSHUA BARKER.

[See Case No. 7,547.]
#### Rutsan Hunt, *Appellant, v.*Aaron Becker and others, *Respon*dents.

Judgment of County Court reversed and that of Justice’s affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Bockes, J.
No. 45086.

#### Protest 986385-G of Alice H. Marks (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the atomizers in question are the same in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 44140. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f) was therefore sustained.
FORM OF LETTER AGREEMENT DATED 4/18/2001



 


Exhibit 10.8

April 18, 2001

Accenture SCA


398 Route d’Esch


L-1471


Luxembourg

Ladies and Gentlemen:

(1) Reference is made to the Transfer Rights Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2001 (as amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified, the “Transfer Rights Agreement”; terms defined therein
used herein as so defined), among Accenture SCA, a Luxembourg société en commandite par actions, and the covered persons party thereto.

(2) The undersigned agrees that if (1) the General Partner of Accenture SCA holds more than 40% of the issued share capital of Accenture SCA and (2) Accenture SCA receives a satisfactory opinion from an
internationally recognized counsel or professional tax advisor that such exchange should be without tax cost with respect to the undersigned, Accenture SCA may cause the undersigned to deliver any Common Share beneficially owned by the undersigned
to Accenture SCA or its assignee in exchange for delivery to the undersigned of the number of Accenture Ltd Class A Common Shares that is equal to the Valuation Ratio.

(3) The undersigned agrees to execute such additional documents and take such further action as may be reasonably necessary to effect the provisions of this letter agreement.

(4) This letter agreement may not be amended except by an instrument signed in writing by each of the parties hereto or waived except by the party granting the waiver. This agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of Luxembourg.





 
          Very truly yours,


          _________________________________


          Name:


















Acknowledged and agreed:

ACCENTURE SCA


By: ACCENTURE LTD, its General Partner





By _________________________________


      Name:


      Title:
No. 46233.

#### Protests 27822-K, etc., of York St. Flax Spinning Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty.
No. 64239.

protest 59/23697 (Baltimore).

#### Rio Grande Importing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner v. United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synergy  Financial  Group,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
we,  John S.  Fiore,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Ralph  A.
Fernandez,  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                          <C>

/s/John S. Fiore                               /s/Ralph A. Fernandez
-------------------------------------          -------------------------------------------------
John S. Fiore                                  Ralph A. Fernandez
President and Chief Executive Officer          Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: November 15, 2004                         Date: November 15, 2004

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that,
to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William L. Hedgepeth II          
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | William L. Hedgepeth II              
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
C:\Users\Javier\OneDrive\FMCS\DOE RegNeg 2014\Issues\Housing Housing Working Group Issues.twdx

Monday, August 4, 2014

 Manufactured Housing

Working Group

Issues

1. HUD or IECC 2015 climate zones? 1.1. Climate zone impacts 1.1.1. Single v. Double

1.1.2. Other specialty types

2. How implemented

(Performance rather than prescriptive)

2.1. Compliance

2.2. Energy labeling

2.3. Field v. Factory Performance Testing

3. Thermal requirements

3.1. U-Values

3.2. Duct...

3.3. Glazing

3.4. Insulation Installation grading

4. Overall impact on affordability

4.1. Financial 4.1.1. Assumptions

4.2. Financing

4.3. Competitiveness

4.4. Justification

4.5. Enviornmental extranalities

(Climate Change)

4.6. Operation & Maintenace or Purchase

4.7. Appreciation v. Depreciation

4.8. Consumer awareness and education support

5. Equipment HVAC and DHW

Appliances 5.1. Acoustics

6. Indoor air quality

6.1. Ventilation

6.2. Whole house tightness

6.3. Acoustics

7. Interaction w/ other standards... 7.1. Impact on EPA's Energy Star

program for MH

8. Durability

8.1. Resiliency to more severe

weather events

8.2. Water resistive barriers

8.3. Window flashing

8.4. Part of durability

(Moisture)

9. MH characteristics that need

to be treated differently

9.1. MH types that need to be treated differently

9.2. Sizing of Unit

10. ASHRAE 62.2 Under IAQ & HVAC

 Manufactured Housing

Working Group

Issues
No. 40246.

#### Protests 964435-G, etc., of American Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

*507Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the records presented and following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.