alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

PD-1539-07

ROBERT HUFFMAN, Appellant

v.

 THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF

CASE 04-06-00126-CR OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

BEXAR COUNTY

WOMACK, J., filed a concurring opinion.

I agree with the observation in Judge Meyers’s opinion (ante) that the court’s

charge to the jury presented theories of liability that were not raised by the evidence, and

with Judge Cochran’s opinion (post) that there was only one offense and that a charge in

the disjunctive could be proper. Therefore I concur in the judgment of the Court.

Filed: October 1, 2008

Publish.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 30, 2019

d0422

Order 

Clerk

April 30, 2019

157992(28)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157992

COA: 340731

Hillsdale CC: 13-373061-FC

ROBERT MANUEL-GUY McCOY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s December 4, 

2018 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
No. 50169.

#### Protest 77275-K of F. W. Woolworth Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the harmonicas in question are-similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of Abstract 49930, which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the claim at 40; percent under paragraph 1541 was sustained.
June 26, 1940

No. 44081.

#### Protest 977645-G of Rhodes Bros.

C. D. 334. Motion of Government for rehearing granted.
HERE
No. 40258.

#### Protest 958836-G of Const. Gallanos (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It was stipulated that the commodity in question is olives in brine. On the authority of *Skourtsis*v. *United States*(T. D. 48218) the claim at 20 cents per gallon under paragraph 744 was sustained.
Exhibit 23.1





Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent



We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement of Ambow Education Holding Ltd on Form F-3 (File No. 333-231273) of our report dated April 22, 2020,
which includes change in accounting principle, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Ambow Education
Holding Ltd as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Ambow Education Holding Ltd for the year ended December 31, 2019. We also consent to the reference
to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of the Registration Statement.



/s/ Marcum Bernstein & Pinchuk llp



Marcum Bernstein & Pinchuk llp

Beijing, China

April 22, 2020







BEIJING OFFICE • Unit 2419-2422 •
Kerry Center South Tower • 1 Guang Hua Road • Chaoyang District, Beijing • 100020

Phone 8610.8518.7992 • Fax 8610.8518.7993
 • www.marcumbp.com
Cite as 2017 Ark. 124

No. C V

- 16

- 1015

MATTHEW W. BARNETT APPELLANT
V. DEXTER PAYNE, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR , ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ; MS. RAMSEY, G RIMES UNIT CLASSIFICATION OFFICER; AND MR. PEARCE, GRIMES UNIT CLASSIFICATION OFFICER APPELLEES Opinion Delivered April 13, 2017

PRO SE APPEAL FROM PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [ No. 600T

- 50

- 6 ]
HONORABLE TIMOTHY DAVIS FOX, JUDGE

REMANDED

.

PER CURIAM Appellant Matthew W. Barnett submitted to the Pulaski County C ircuit C ourt a pro

se petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis so that he might initiate an action seeking judicial review of an administrative action taken by the named appellee s , employees of the Arkansas Department of Correction , who had denied a grievance filed by Barnett that was
related to his application for a work

- release program. Barnett also submitted to the circuit

court an affidavit of indigency in support of his requ est to proceed in forma pauperis. The petition to proceed as a pauper and the underlying pleading were file marked and assigned a miscellaneous case number used to docket documents not associated with a specific circuit court case number . The circuit court denied the in forma pauperis petition without stating the factual basis for the denial. Barnett filed a timely appeal from the denialCite as 2017 Ark. 124

2 of his in forma pauperis petition, and the record on appeal was lodged in this court on November 10, 2016

. Barnett filed a timely brief. The State has not filed a responsive brief.
Under Rule 72 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure (2016) , the right to proceed
in forma pauperis is based on , among other things, indigency and the circuit court ’ s satisfactio n that the alleged facts indicate a colorable cause of action. Dunahue v. Dennis , 2016 Ark. 285, at 2 (per curiam); Boles v. Huckabee , 340 Ark. 410, 12 S.W.3d 201 (2000) (per curiam). A colorable cause of action is a claim that is legitimate and may reas onably be asserted given the facts presented and the current law or a reasonable and logical extension
or modification of it. Dunahue , 2016 Ark. 285, at 2 Rule 72 mandates that the circuit court make a specific finding of indigency based
on the petitioner’s affidavit. Here, the circuit court did not address the validity of Barnett’s affidavit of indigency nor did it address whether Barnett’s underlying pleading stated a
colorable cause of action. Appellate courts do not make findings of fact bu t rather review findings of fact of the circuit court to determine whether they are clearly erroneous. Ward
v. Williams , 354 Ark. 168, 177 , 118 S.W.3d 513, 518 (2003). Because the circuit court
failed to enter a n order setting forth the factual basis for denying Barnett’s in forma pauperis petition , the matter is remanded for that purpose. The court is directed to file a supplemental order within thirty days and submit that order to this court in compliance with
Rule 72 . When the reman d is returned, a new briefing schedule will be set for the appeal.
Remanded

. Matthew W. Barn ett , pro se appellant. One brief only.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8780 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8780

  To direct the Attorney General to authorize the youth gun violence 
                          prevention program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2024

  Mr. Goldman of New York (for himself and Mr. Gomez) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Attorney General to authorize the youth gun violence 
                          prevention program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prioritizing Resources for Outreach, 
Safety, Violence Prevention, Youth Empowerment and Resilience Act of 
2024'' or the ``PROSPER Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF YOUTH GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Attorney General is authorized to carry out a 
program for youth gun violence prevention.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Of the amounts otherwise 
appropriated for each of fiscal year 2025 though fiscal year 2030, for 
juvenile justice programs--
            (1) $100,000,000 shall be made available for grants under 
        title V of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act 
        of 1974 (34 U.S.C. note et seq.); and
            (2) $25,000,000 of the amount under paragraph (1) shall be 
        made available to carry out a program for youth gun violence 
        prevention.
                                 <all>
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4849 

To require the Secretary of State to seek to enter into negotiations with 

the Government of Ukraine for the establishment by that Government 

of a foreign investment review mechanism. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to seek to enter into 

negotiations with the Government of Ukraine for the 

establishment by that Government of a foreign investment review mechanism. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEGOTIATIONS WITH UKRAINE FOR ESTAB4 LISHMENT OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT RE5 VIEW MECHANISM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State shall seek 

7 to enter into negotiations with the Government of Ukraine 

8 for— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4849 IS

1 (1) the establishment by that Government of a 

2 mechanism for reviewing foreign investment in 

3 Ukraine, particularly foreign investment from the 

4 People’s Republic of China, including entities based 

5 in the People’s Republic of China or subject to the 

6 jurisdiction of the People’s Republic of China, that 

7 is similar to reviews conducted by the Committee on 

8 Foreign Investment in the United States under sec9 tion 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 

10 U.S.C. 4565) into foreign investment in the United 

11 States; and 

12 (2) the provision of assistance by the United 

13 States relating to establishing that mechanism, in14 cluding— 

15 (A) the provision of training to officials of 

16 the Government of Ukraine to develop the 

17 skillsets required to conduct reviews of foreign 

18 investment; 

19 (B) assistance with the purchase of equip20 ment required by the entity that will be con21 ducting the reviews; and 

22 (C) sending staff of the Committee on For23 eign Investment in the United States to 

24 Ukraine for consultations. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4849 IS

1 (b) DIRECT HIRE AUTHORITY.—To carry out sub2 section (a), the Secretary may appoint, without regard to 

3 the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, 

4 United States Code (other than sections 3303 and 3328 

5 of that title), candidates with appropriate qualifications 

6 directly to positions within the Department of State. 

7 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

8 are authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 for each of 

9 fiscal year 2025 through 2029 to provide assistance under 

10 subsection (a)(2). 

11 (d) TERMINATION.—This section and the authorities 

12 provided under this section shall terminate on the date 

13 that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this 

14 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 58084.

protests 216243-K, etc. (New York).

#### Dodge & Olcott, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*491Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of camphor oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Orbis Products Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 244, C. D. 1527), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 10228-038]


American Municipal Power--Ohio, Inc., Cannelton Hydroelectric 
Project, L.P.; Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment

March 27, 2007.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) 
regulations contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (18 CFR 
part 380 [FERC Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897]), the Office of Energy 
Projects staff (staff) reviewed a proposal to amend the design 
authorized by the license for the Cannelton Hydroelectric Project, to 
be located at the U.S. Corps of Engineers' Cannelton Locks and Dam on 
the Ohio River in Hancock County, Kentucky, and prepared an 
environmental assessment (EA) for the proposed amendment of the project 
license. In this EA, staff analyzes the potential environmental effects 
of replacing the authorized 140 small generator units with three 
conventional turbine and generator units and concludes that the 
amendment would not constitute a major federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA is attached to a Commission order titled ``Order 
Amending License,'' issued March 22, 2007 and is available for review 
at the Commission in the Public Reference Room, located at 888 First 
Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or may be viewed on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' 
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the 
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-
free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#40060512030f2e2c292e25133530302f323400262532236e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f0b6b5a2b3bf9e9c999e95a38580809f8284b096958293de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>. For TTY, call 
(202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-5997 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### State, *ex rel.*John Davidson, v. L. L. Parks and Harry N. Sandler, as Judges of the Circuit Court in and for Hillsborough County, and Hazel Victoria Hudson, as Administratrix of the Estate of John Edwin Artille, deceased.

175 So. 792.

Opinion Filed July 31, 1937.

*McKay, Macfarlane, Jackson & Ramsey*and *Chester F. Ferguson,*for Relator; -

*Hampton, Bull & Crom*and *J. Tom Watson,*for Respondents.

Chapman, J.

This suit was before the Court the first time and reported in 170 Sou. Rep. 707. The facts are similar and involve the same principles of law this day enunciated in the suit of State, *ex rel.*H. E. Wolfe Construction Co., *et al.,*v. L. L. Parks, *et al.,*opinion this day filed. This case being controlled by the authority of said suit the demurrer is sustained, the rule » discharged, and the petition dismissed.

*65Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Brown, J., concurs specially.

Brown, J.

(concurring specially).—I concur in .the result, because, for the reasons stated by Mr. Chief Justice Ellis, in his concurring opinion in the companion case this day decided, and which is cited above, it is, I think, clearly made to appear that the Circuit Court has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter and that it is not exceeding its jurisdiction. If it has made or may make any error in its rulings on the questions discussed in Mr. Justice Chapman’s opinion, they can be reviewed here by writ of error. But writ of prohibition does not lie. See the numerous cases cited in Peacock v. Miller, 123 Fla. 97, 166 So. 212.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2010-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association.

| |  |  |  |                                                    
| |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | /s/ Jason Kulas                                    
| |  |  |  |                                                    
| |  |  |  | Name: Jason Kulas                                  
| |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer Date: March 30, 2012
AUDITORS CONSENT


 

 EXHIBIT 10(i)

 






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

To the Board of Directors of

C.M. Life Insurance Company

 



        We consent to the use in this Post Effective Amendment No. 10 to Registration Statement No. 33-61679 on Form N-4 of our
report dated February 15, 2001 on the Panorama Premier Segment of C.M. Life Multi-Account A and of our report dated February 8, 2001 on C.M. Life Insurance Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
referring to the use of statutory accounting practices which differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America) appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement,
and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Statement of Additional Information.


 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Hartford, Connecticut

April 25, 2001
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
of Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kevin Landis and Omar Billawala, as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)       The report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 134; and



(2)       The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Kevin Landis               | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: Kevin Landis             | 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer | 
|Dated: May 16, 2022            | 
|                               | 
|/s/ Omar Billawala             | 
|Name: Omar Billawala           | 
|Title: Chief Financial Officer | 
|Dated: May 16, 2022            |
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.1 TO FORM 8K

TFC ENTERPRISES, INC.
NEWS RELEASE

TFC ENTERPRISES, INC.      CONTACT:  RON TRAY
NEWS RELEASE                         757-858-1400

*FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE*

TFC ENTERPRISES, INC. ANNOUNCES NEW VICE PRESIDENT OF FINANCE

NORFOLK, VA, April 5, 2001 /PRNewswire/ -- TFC Enterprises, Inc. (the Company)
(NASDAQ:  TFCE) today announced that Denise Newlon, the Company's current
controller, has been promoted to the position of Vice President of Finance.  In
this role, she will perform many of the duties undertaken by the Company's
former Chief Financial Officer who has left the Company.  Ms. Newlon will become
the Company's principal accounting officer, and be primarily responsible for
preparation of the Company's financial statements and Securities and Exchange
Commission filings.  Ron Tray, the Company's President and Chief Operating
Officer will take on certain of the additional responsibilities of and become
the Company's Chief Financial Officer.  Robert Raley, the Company's Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer will assist Mr. Tray in this regard.  The Company does
not anticipate hiring a new Chief Financial Officer for the foreseeable future.

TFC Enterprises, Inc. conducts its operations primarily through two wholly-owned
subsidiaries:  THE Finance Company, specializes in purchasing and servicing
installment sales contracts originated by automobile and motorcycle dealers and
First Community Finance, Inc., specializes in the direct origination and
servicing of consumer loans. Based in Norfolk, VA, TFC Enterprises, Inc., has
thirteen contract production offices of THE Finance Company throughout the
United States and twenty-one offices of First Community Finance in Virginia and
North Carolina. The Company's common stock symbol is listed on Nasdaq National
Market and trades under the symbol "TFCE".
(Reap. Dec. 8897)

Entry No. 879582.

#### The Otto Gerdau Co. *v.*United States

(Decided July 10, 1957)

*Strauss & Hedges*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeal listed above has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts to the effect that on or about the date of exportation the market value or price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, was the appraised value, less ocean freight and insurance, as invoiced, and that the foreign value was no higher.

Upon the agreed statement of facts, I find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the appraised value, less ocean freight and insurance, as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
General Term—Fifth Department.

Filed October 19, 1889.

#### Tobias Witmar, App’lt, v. Christian Hagen, Resp’t.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

RONALD BLOODWORTH,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:10-CV-1122 

 Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge King

DEBORA A. TIMMERMAN-COOPER,

et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

On September 29, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge

recommended that plaintiff’s request for interim injunctive relief, Doc.

No. 30, be denied. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 35. Although the

parties were advised of their right to object to that recommendation and

of the consequences of their failure to do so, there has been no

objection.

The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 35, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 

Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief, Doc. No. 30, is DENIED. 

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:10-cv-01122-ALM-NMK Doc #: 44 Filed: 11/08/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>