alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 49289.

#### Protest 993104-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial plaintiff introduced as exhibit 1 a broken figure described on the invoice as “Peking carved ivory lady, 1007 L.” and it was stipulated that all of the items described on the invoice as “ivory ladies” are valued at not less than $2.50 each. However, there were two items on the invoice, other than 1007 L, described as ivory ladies. The plaintiff called one witness but no testimony was introduced tending to show that he was an artist or sculptor or that he had any qualifications as an expert on works of art. Various cases were cited by the plaintiff. On examination the court found that some of the cases covered ivory figures but that expert testimony was introduced therein showing that the articles possessed artistic merit. The defendant cited various cases, among which was *United States*v. *Olivotti*(7 Ct. Cust. Appls. 46, T. D. 36309), which decision construed paragraph 376 of the Tariff Act of 1913, which corresponds with paragraph 1547 of the present act. No case, however, was cited in which the court, in the absence of expert testimony, took judicial notice that imported articles were sculptures which were works of the free fine arts. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 61965.

#### Accurate Millinery Co. *v.*United States,

protest 307327-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
#### McCabe Bros. Co. *v.*United States

No. 6318.

Entry No. 21-S.

Invoice dated Fort William, Ontario, Canada, August 2, 1944.

Certified August 2, 1944.

Entered at Superior, Wis., August 5, 1944.

(Decided August 12, 1946)

*George D. McCUntock*and *Robert J. Christianson (George D. McClintock*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*282
      *Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard H. Welsh,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following oral stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States is as follows: $22 per ton, Canadian funds f. o. b. boat, Fort William.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is $22 per ton, Canadian funds, f. o. b. boat, Fort William.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8325 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8325

    To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue 
  regulations to ensure due process rights for physicians before any 
termination, restriction, or reduction of the professional activity of 
        such physicians or staff privileges of such physicians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2024

 Mr. Ruiz (for himself, Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania, Ms. Porter, and Mr. 
   Murphy) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue 
  regulations to ensure due process rights for physicians before any 
termination, restriction, or reduction of the professional activity of 
        such physicians or staff privileges of such physicians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Physician and Patient Safety Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATIONS TO ENSURE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS FOR PHYSICIANS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
issue final regulations to provide that physicians who have been 
granted medical staff privileges at a hospital have a fair hearing and 
appellate review through appropriate medical staff mechanisms before 
any termination, restriction, or reduction of the professional activity 
of such physicians or staff privileges of such physicians at such 
hospital.
    (b) Requirements of Regulations.--The regulations described in 
subsection (a) shall provide that--
            (1) a hearing or appellate review may not be denied through 
        a third-party contract;
            (2) a physician shall not be requested or required to waive 
        their rights to such a hearing or appellate review as a 
        condition of employment, either with the hospital or with a 
        third-party contractor; and
            (3) any such hearing or appellate review shall be 
        confidential and not reportable to any entity, including the 
        National Practitioner Data Bank or future workplaces or 
        employers, unless there is an ongoing threat to patient safety, 
        or as otherwise required under the reporting requirements for 
        hospitals established by the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    (c) Effective Date.--The final regulations promulgated under 
subsection (a) shall take effect not later than 18 months after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)


I, Alyson M. Mount, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





Dated: March 27, 2015





By: /s/ Alyson M. Mount


Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8589 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8589

       To require the United States Postal Service to implement 
recommendations from the Inspector General of the United States Postal 
 Service for decreasing instances of delayed mail, improving staffing, 
                 and training, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 31, 2024

 Mr. Stauber introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To require the United States Postal Service to implement 
recommendations from the Inspector General of the United States Postal 
 Service for decreasing instances of delayed mail, improving staffing, 
                 and training, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Mail Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR THE POSTAL SERVICE TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN 
              RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.

    Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the United States Postal Service shall review and, to the extent 
practicable, implement the recommendations of the Inspector General of 
the United States Postal Service with respect to delayed mail, 
staffing, and training in the report by the Office of the Inspector 
General of the United States Postal Service entitled ``Delivery in 
Northern Minnesota'' (Report Number 24-048-R24) and dated May 6, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
Case No. 13,252.

#### SPRAGUE v. The MARIA.

[See Case No. 13,253.]
#### Jones *v.*State.

In Banc.

Nov. 8, 1948.

(37 So. (2d) 311)

*285O. D. Brame, for appellant.

R. O. Arrington, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*286Montgomery, J.

The appellant was indicted by the grand jury of Simpson County on a charge of wilfully, unlawfully and intentionally pointing a pistol at and toward Dewit Mangum, a human being, not in his necessary self-defense nor in the lawful discharge of his official duty. Jones plead not guilty and moved for a continuance on the ground that he was sick and physically unable to stand trial at the term. In support of his said motion, he offered the testimony of his wife, Dr. D. T. Love, and himself, establishing beyond question that his physical condition rendered it impossible for him to go to trial. The court overruled the motion for continuance and set the trial for the following Monday, when the appellant was tried in his involuntary absence and convicted. This was error.

 The appellant had the constitutional right to be present when tried, to be heard in his own behalf, and to be confronted by the witnesses against him. Such right was guaranteed to him by Section 26 of the Constitution, which applies to trials for misdemeanors as well as felonies. In a trial for a misdemeanor, the accused may, by his own fault or misconduct, waive his right to be present. Williams v. State, 103 Miss. 147, 60 So. 73. But, where the absence of the accused is due to his physical inability to attend his trial, it cannot be said that he voluntarily absents himself; and, if tried in his absence, he is thereby deprived of his constitutional right to be present. Corbin v. State, 99 Miss. 486, 55 So. 43; Haggett v. State, 99 Miss. 844, 56 So. 172; Sullivan v. State, 150 Miss. 204, 116 So. 612.

Reversed and remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, February 8, 2007 at 2 p.m. ET. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Inez De Jesus at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7977. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Thursday, February 8, 2007 at 2 p.m. ET via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write Inez De Jesus, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Inez De Jesus. Ms. De Jesus can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

*The agenda will include:*                     Various IRS issues.                 

Dated: January 9, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E7-587 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. AC07-81-000] 

Take notice that on March 23, 2007, Trans-Union Interstate Pipeline, L.P., submitted a request for a waiver of its requirement to submit a 2006 FERC Form No. 2-A. The FERC Form No. 2-A is required under section 260.2 of the Commission's regulations. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible online at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     April 19, 2007.                 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-6202 Filed 4-3-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

In connection with the quarterly report of DayStar Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Christopher T. Lail, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

Date: May 24, 2010
April 10, 1952

No. 56555.

Suit 4673.

#### United States *v.*M. V. Jenkins et al.

Reap. Dec. 7924 affirmed January 29, 1952. C. A. D. 479.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Jeffrey Allen Lindsay

,

Appellant,

v.

The Estate of Roy Orey Lindsay, Sr., Roy

A. Lindsay, Rainey L. Lindsay, Susan

Lindsay Thomas, Joni K. Lindsay, Roy A.

("Sonny") Lindsay, and Hanging H.

Ranch, Inc.

,

Appellee s

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 212

- C V

Appeal from the

143 rd District Court

of Reeves C ounty, Texas

(TC# 13

- 12

- 20542 P3137 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion for voluntary dismissal of

a

ppeal. However, the motion does not contain a certificate of conference pursuant to Rule

10.1(a)(5) Tex .R.App.P. Therefore, the Court ha s determined that no action will be taken on the

motion to dismiss pending a response from the Appellees. The Appellees are ORDERED to file a

response with this Court on or before December 3, 2021.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 2 3 rd day of November , 20 2 1

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT  4.1


             ------------------------------------------------------
               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
             ------------------------------------------------------

------                                                           --------------
  No.                                                                 Shares
------                                                           --------------
                               The State of Nevada

[LOGO]
                             Foothills Resources, Inc.
        One Forty Five Million Common Shares Authorized, $0.001 Par Value

This Certifies That SPECIMEN is the owner of ______________________ Common
Shares $0.001 par value each of the Capital Stock of

                            Foothills Resources, Inc.

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers, and to be sealed with the Seal of the
Corporation this ______ day of _____________ At

[SEAL]


-------------------------                               -----------------------
       President                                               Secretary

                               -------- ---------
                               SHARES $0.001 EACH
                               -------- ---------



                                   CERTIFICATE
                                       FOR

                                     SHARES

                               [SEAL APPEARS HERE]

                                     OF THE

                                  CAPITAL STOCK


                            Foothills Resources, Inc.

                                    ISSUED TO


                                      DATED



         For Value Received ______ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
Shares of the Capital Stock represented by the written Certificate and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint __________________________________________ to


<PAGE>


transfer the said Stock on the books of the within named corporation with full
power of substitution in the premises.

Dated _________________________

In presence of _______________________

NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN
ON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION AND
ENLARGEMENTS OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER