alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8736 

To require the President to notify Congress of each instance the President 

takes certain drugs relating to cognitive function, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2024 

Mr. OGLES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To require the President to notify Congress of each instance 

the President takes certain drugs relating to cognitive 

function, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Juicing Joe Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

7 President shall notify the House of Representatives and 

8 the Senate not later than five days after each instance 

9 the President ingests or otherwise takes a dose of any 

10 stimulant (not including caffeine or nicotine) or any anaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:38 Aug 03, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8736.IH H8736

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8736 IH

1 bolic steroid, narcotic, or other drug known to heighten 

2 or impair alertness, judgement, or mood. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
ACCMeeting February 20, 2015 for TDI SNUR Name Office Phone 

## L
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Monitronics International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael R. Haislip,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)              The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)              The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                    |   | By:    |   | /s/ Michael R.  Haislip                |
|--------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|               |   |   |   | Michael R.  Haislip                    |
|               |   |   |   | Chief Executive  Officer and President |
|               |   |   |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)         |
| Date: May 14, 2007 |   |   |   |                                   |

 

----
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00135- CV
In re John Mark Quaak

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Relator, J ohn Mark Quaa k, an inmate in the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice, filed a pro se petition seeking an “injunction with re straining order ” in this Court. L ooking to the substance of Quaa

k’s petition, rathe r than its title or form, we construe his petition as a petition for writ of mandamus. See Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel , 9 9 7 S
. W
. 2 d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999) (cour ts look to substance of pleading rathe r than its caption or form to deter mine its nature ); see also Tex. Gov’t C ode Ann. § 2 2
. 2 2 1 (W es t Supp. 2010); Tex. R. App. P
. 52.1. I n his petition, Quaak asks us to compel ce rt ain named prison officia ls of the Terr ell Unit of the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice to take, or ref rain fr om taking, pa

rticular a ctions. This Court d o es not have mandamus jurisdiction over the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice or personne l t h er eo f. By statute, this Court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus aga inst “a judge of a district or county court in the co u rt o f ap p ea l s district” and other writs as nece ssary to enfor ce our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. Staff members of

the Ter rell Unit are not parties ag ainst whom we may issue a wr it of mandamus. Norhas Quaa

k demonstrated that the exercise of our writ power is nece ssary to enfor ce our jurisdiction. We have no jurisdiction to g rant Qua ak the r elief he seeks.

Acc ording ly , the petition is dism issed for wa nt of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Rose Dismissed For Want of Jurisdiction Filed: May

3, 2012

2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorcrossSafety Products L.L.C. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert A. Peterson,Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: May 11, 2005 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT A. PETERSON                         |   |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | Robert A. Peterson                             |
|                |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Manager |
|                |   | (Chief Executive Officer)                      |

 

**A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained bythe Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.**

 

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The triennial comprehensivereport on immigration [electronic resource].**
 
2nd | 3rd
 
SuDoc Number:J 21.21:
Item Number:0723-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:000598143
 
February 6, 2020
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Nathaniel F. Bradley IV, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Asset AcceptanceCapital Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: July 28, 2004 /s/ Nathaniel F. Bradley IV   Nathaniel F. Bradley IV   President & Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.100.1


SCHEDULE IDENTIFYING SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL AGREEMENT(S)  TO EXHIBIT 10.100
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment Two, dated as of June 23, 2000, by and among Collins Holdings EME,
LLC, Collins Trust II, Wilmington Trust Company, Collins Generation II, LLC,
Edison Mission Midwest Holdings Co., Midwest Generation, LLC, Midwest Funding
LLC, Bayerische Landesbank International S.A., Bayerische Landesbank
Girozentrale, and Citibank, N.A.

         This Amendment Two differs from Exhibit 10.100 in the following
respects:

                  In Section 3(a), "Facility Lease Agreement (T1)" is replaced
         by "Facility Lease Agreement (T2)."

                  In Section 3(b), "Facility Sublease Agreement (T1)" is
         replaced by "Facility Sublease Agreement (T2)."

Amendment Two, dated as of June 23, 2000, by and among Collins Holdings EME,
LLC, Collins Trust III, Wilmington Trust Company, Collins Generation III, LLC,
Edison Mission Midwest Holdings Co., Midwest Generation, LLC, Midwest Funding
LLC, Bayerische Landesbank International S.A., Bayerische Landesbank
Girozentrale, and Citibank, N.A.

         This Amendment Two differs from Exhibit 10.100 in the following
respects:

                  In Section 3(a), "Facility Lease Agreement (T1)" is replaced
         by "Facility Lease Agreement (T3)."

                  In Section 3(b), "Facility Sublease Agreement (T1)" is
         replaced by "Facility Sublease Agreement (T3)."

Amendment Two, dated as of June 23, 2000, by and among Collins Holdings EME,
LLC, Collins Trust IV, Wilmington Trust Company, Collins Generation IV, LLC,
Edison Mission Midwest Holdings Co., Midwest Generation, LLC, Midwest Funding
LLC, Bayerische Landesbank International S.A., Bayerische Landesbank
Girozentrale, and Citibank, N.A.

<PAGE>


         This Amendment Two differs from Exhibit 10.100 in the following
respects:

                  In Section 3(a), "Facility Lease Agreement (T1)" is replaced
         by "Facility Lease Agreement (T4)."

                  In Section 3(b), "Facility Sublease Agreement (T1)" is
         replaced by "Facility Sublease Agreement (T4)."
No. 48621.

#### Protests 595607-G, etc., of Vincenzo Sabella & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that involved in Abstract 42146 and *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706). In accordance therewith the claim for an allowance of 234-percent in the weight was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Quanta Capital Holdings Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") and pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, I, John S. Brittain, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 4,
2005

/s/ John S. Brittain, Jr.John S.
Brittain, Jr. (Principal Financial
Officer)

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6722

VIDAL O’NEAL GREEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SUPERINTENDENT SMILEY, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (CA-01-75-1) Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vidal O’Neal Green, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Vidal O’Neal Green seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Green v. Smiley , No. CA-01-75-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Norcross Safety ProductsL.L.C. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert A. Peterson, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: November 10, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Robert A. Peterson              |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Robert A. Peterson                  |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer and Manager |
|                     |   | (Chief Executive  Officer)          |

 

 

**A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will beretained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 26, 2012

d1217 

# Order

December 26, 2012

144961(21)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144961

COA: 306929

Macomb CC: 2010

- 000721

- FH

MYRON ODELL BANKS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 24, 2012

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of BioVeris Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George V. Migausky, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1)         the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: February 10, 2006 | /s/ George V. Migausky                     |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                     | George V. Migausky                         |
|                     | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
### Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = EWR

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 01/01/2010 (Current & Future) 12/21/2010 07:54:11



### Query Parameters:

### 12/21/2010 07:54:11

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Operators)

Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2010 (Current & Future)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 34

ACA AIR CANADA 18

AFR AIR FRANCE 2

AIC AIR INDIA 2

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4

ASH MESA AIRLINES 3

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 4

CHQ CHAUTAUQUA 15

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 905

COM COMAIR AIRLINES 2

CPA CATHAY PACIFIC 1

CPZ COMPASS AIRLINES 14

CSQ CARGOJET 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 21

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 6

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 9

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 1

FDX FED EX 9

FLG PINNACLE AIRLINES (dba NORTHWEST 2

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 27

JZA AIR CANADA JAZZ 6

NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 16

PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 8

POE PORTER AIRLINES 17

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINES 4

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 4

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 1

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 2

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 32

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 4

USA US AIRWAYS 20

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 3

Page 2
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Graeme Halder, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Nord Anglia Education, Inc.;

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

Date:   June 9, 2017

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Graeme Halder |                    |
|--------|-------------------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:             | Graeme Halder           |   |
|   | Title:            | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
MARCI HAMILTON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3598

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 2, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. John F. Simon , Judge

.

Paul M. Villeneuve of the Law Office of Paul M. Villeneuve, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, KELSEY

, and M.K. TH OMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
NUMBER 13-22-00053-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

IN RE STEPHEN P. CARRIGAN

 

On Petition for Writ of Prohibition.

 

ORDER

Before Justices Hinojosa, Tijerina, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

On February 9, 2022, relator Stephen P. Carrigan filed (1) a petition for writ of 

prohibition asserting that the trial court erred by exercising jurisdiction over the underlying 

case, and (2) a motion for emergency stay seeking temporary relief to stay the trial court 

proceedings pending resolution of this original proceeding. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency stay, 

is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we order all trial court proceedings 
2

to be stayed pending further order of this Court or until this case is finally decided. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). 

The Court requests that the real parties in interest, the Commission for Lawyer 

Discipline, Sharon Kaufman, and Carrigan & Anderson PLLC, or any others whose 

interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for 

writ of prohibition on or before the expiration of ten (10) days from the date of this order. 

See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

10th day of February, 2022.
**Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the quarterly report of BioVeris Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, George V. Migausky, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: August 9, 2005 /s/ George V. Migausky   George V. Migausky   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.**