alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Unlimited      Closeouts Inc.          | Ojai,      California            |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| 0716590      B.C. Ltd.                 | Coquitlam,      British Columbia |
| Jarvis      Industries Ltd.            | Coquitlam,      British Columbia |
| Icollector.com      Technologies, Ltd. | Coquitlam,      British Columbia |
| Rapidfusion      Technologies Inc.     | Coquitlam,      British Columbia |
| Gruv      Development Corporation      | Coquitlam,      British Columbia |
| Axion      Investment Corporation      | Coquitlam,      British Columbia |
| Gruv      Holdings Corporation         | Coquitlam,      British Columbia |
| 1963      Lougheed Holdings Ltd.       | Coquitlam,      British Columbia |
| AAC      Holdings Ltd.                 | Coquitlam,      British Columbia |
December 11, 1959

A.R.D. 115.

#### United States *v.*The Heyman Co., Inc.,

Motion by appellant.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we,
Nathaniel F. Bradley IV, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Mark A. Redman, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (a)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Nathaniel F. Bradley IVNathaniel F. Bradley IVChief Executive OfficerJuly 28, 2004/s/ Mark A. RedmanMark A. RedmanChief Financial OfficerJuly 28, 2004
(Reap. Dec. 9207)

#### Curt L. Sterner Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. WH 33222; 930499.

(Decided August 13, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for re-appraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff.

An examination of the official records discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

• Judgment will be entered accordingly.
*As of March 31, 1995, the Social Security Administration

became an independent agency from the Department of

Health and Human Services. Therefore, the court has

substituted Shirley S. Chater for Donna E. Shalala

pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c).

 The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate

1

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was

referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

___________

No. 94-3252

___________

Richard Smith for Rachel Smith, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner * [UNPUBLISHED]

of Social Security, *

*

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: November 29, 1995

 Filed: December 4, 1995

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MAGILL, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Richard Smith, on behalf of his minor daughter, Rachel Smith, appeals

the district court's grant of summary judgment to the Commissioner in his 1

action seeking review of the Commissioner's denial of child's supplemental

security income benefits for Rachel. Having carefully reviewed the record,

we conclude that no error of law appears, and that an opinion would lack

precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case: 2:10-cv-00956-MHW-EPD Doc #: 25 Filed: 04/08/11 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00956-MHW-EPD Doc #: 25 Filed: 04/08/11 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T22:03:12-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Senior Airman CHASANEYA K. JONES

United States Air Force

ACM S32333

23 June 2016

Sentence adjudged 1 May 2015 by SPCM convened at Edwards Air Force 

Base, California. Military Judge: Brendon K. Tukey.

Approved Sentence: Bad-conduct discharge and reduction to E-1.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Captain Patricia Encarnación Miranda.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire.

Before

ALLRED, MITCHELL, and MAYBERRY

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent 

under Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error 

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred.* Article 66(c), 

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed, 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000). 

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

 LEAH M. CALAHAN

Clerk of the Court

 

* There are two errors in the staff judge advocate’s recommendation. First, it states the maximum allowable 

punishment included total forfeitures of pay instead of the Special Court-Martial jurisdictional limit of two-thirds pay 

per month. Additionally, it erroneously lists the date the Convening Authority denied Appellant’s request for 

deferment of the reduction in rank as 8 May 2015, but the denial is actually dated 11 May 2015. Because there were 

no forfeitures adjudged or approved, there is no requirement for new post-trial processing.
2 

cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge 

Felton L. Matthews, Jr. 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A
<PAGE>


                  [Letterhead of Aquis Communications, Inc.]

                               November 23, 1998

Mr. Brian Bobeck
100 Ridge Street
Shavertown, PA 18708

Dear Brian:

I am pleased to offer you the position of Vice President - Engineering for Aquis
Communications, Inc. As Vice President - Engineering, your responsibilities will
be as follows:

A   Responsible for the development and execution of the Company's annual
    engineering business plan.
B.  Responsible for the development and implementation of all approved Company
    engineering compensation and network development programs.
C.  Responsible for the approved hiring and staffing of the Engineering
    Department.
D.  Other corporate and departmental duties appropriate for this position.

The compensation package for the position of Vice President - Engineering will
be the following:

A.  Base Salary: $100,000 per annum, paid bi-monthly.
B.  Stock Options: To be determined by the Board of Directors but commensurate
    with the responsibilities of this position. They would be equivalent to
    $100,000 with five-year vesting or pro rata.
C.  Incentive Plan: To be mutually agreed to by both parties, but in no event
    less than $20,000 in the first year. This incentive compensation will be
    paid annually in arrears.
D.  Auto Allowance: $750.00 per month.
E.  Benefits: Eligible for the Company's full benefit plan.
F.  Location: While an office will be maintained at the Company's headquarters,
    it is agreed that you and the Company will mutually agree on an additional
    office site for you to utilize.
G.  Severance: If your employment is terminated without cause at any time within
    the first thirty-six months of employment, you will be entitled to severance
    of the greater of two months or the balance of thirty-six months from your
    start date. After the initial thirty-six month period, severance shall be
    no less than two months. [initials]

Please confirm your agreement with this offer by signing this letter below and
returning it to me at your earliest convenience. I look forward to working with
you.


                                      Very truly yours,

                                      AQUIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

                                      /s/ John X. Adiletta
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      John X. Adiletta
                                      President

I accept the position as well as the terms and the conditions as set forth in
this letter.


/s/ Brian Bobeck                           12-2-78
--------------------------------           ------------------------------
Brian Bobeck                               Date
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Global Energy Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10- KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we,
the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. April 29, 2004
    
    /s/ Carlos CoeCarlos CoeChief Executive Officer
No. 44125.

#### Protest 835779-G of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the squawker balloons in question are composed in part of bamboo and are similar to those the subject of Abstract 40493. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 409 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Protect Pharmaceutical Corporation. (the “Company”) for the period
ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Una Taylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



Date:
February 27, 2019



|By: | /s/
    UNA TAYLOR                | 
|--- | --------------------------------- | 
|    | Una
    Taylor                    | 
|    | Chief
    Executive Officer       | 
|    | (Principal
    Executive Officer) |
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer ofMakeMyTrip Limited (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying annual reporton Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2017 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: July 18, 2017 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, and is not being “filed” either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subjectto the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
EXHIBIT 23












HKCMCPA Company Limited


Certified Public Accountants


















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
     To the Board of Directors
 China ShouGuan Mining Corporation
   We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of our report dated April 13, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of China ShouGuan Mining Corporation as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the report.
   /s/ HKCMCPA Company Limited
 (Formerly ZYCPA Company Limited)
 Certified Public Accountants
 
 Hong Kong, China
  April 13, 2011
     9 FLOOR, CHINACHEM HOLLYWOOD CENTER, 1-13 HOLLYWOOD ROAD, CENTRAL HONG KONG
  Phone: (852) 2573 2296 Fax: (852) 2384 2022                                                                       http://www.zycpa.us
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                     Ending
Class          Interest         Principal         Losses             Balance
<S>              <C>              <C>               <C>                 <C>
A1             767291.67       3313879.74                0       123686120.25
A2             263646.25                0                0           43638000
A3                     0                0                0             362000
A4             270841.88                0                0           44829000
APO                    0         26593.34                0         4334447.85
AR                   0.6              100                0                  0
B1              26329.58          3213.06                0         4354786.94
B2              11781.25          1437.69                0         1948562.31
B3               6929.79           845.66                0         1146154.34
B4               4156.67           507.25                0          687492.75
B5               2767.08           337.67                0          457662.33
B6                3402.4                0           423.42          573882.48


</TABLE>
#### Christian Von Hesse, as Executor, Resp’t, *v.*Marie Louise Mackaye, Impleaded, App’lt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,*

*Filed January 24, 1890.)*

Injunction—Will not be granted to restrain payment oe securities EMBRACED IN LITIGATION IN FOREIGN COUNTRY BETWEEN THE PARTIES.

Where plaintiff has submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the courts of a foreign country, in which country the property sought to be affected by this action is situated, no case is made for an injunction restraining defendants from paying it over.

Appeal from an order of the special term granting an injunction *pendente lite.*

*Noah Davis,*for app’lt; *George H. Starr,*for resp’t.

Barrett, J.

The opinion delivered upon the appeal from the-order denying Mrs. Mackaye’s motion to vacate the publication). *234proceedings is decisive of this appeal. We have there endeav ored to show that the court is wholly without jurisdiction in this action, so far as Mrs. Mackaye is concerned. We have also decided that the subject-matter is not within the state of ¡New York. The papers upon this appeal supplement some facts which were wanting upon the application to set aside the order of publication. They show, for instance, that some of the bonds in question were payable in the city of ¡New York. But there are no facts which can give vitality to the order of publication, which was made without authority and is consequently void. Apart from this question of jurisdiction, the plaintiff’s papers make out no case ior an injunction. He has submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the courts where the property is situated. If the proceedings already instituted in the foreign tribunals are technically insufficient to settle the question of right upon the merits, the plaintiff is at liberty to institute fresh proceedings specially directed to that <end. His suit here is, upon the facts disclosed in his own papers, unnecessary and oppressive. It is wholly without merit in its present aspect; and the attempt by bringing in and enjoining the corporations, to force Mrs. Mackaye into a jurisdiction foreign to her domicil, and foreign to the *situs*of the property, cannot be commended.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and the usual disbursements, and the injunction dissolved.

Yan Brunt, P. J., and Bartlett, J., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 


EASTERN DIVISION 


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 


Plaintiff, Case No. 2:11-cr-259 

v. JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

RIGOBERTO G. VELEZ, 

Defendant. 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on the Government's Motion to Correct the Record. 

(Doc. 29.) The Government moves this Court to correct the record in this case to reflect 

Defendant Rigoberto G. Velez's fugitive status. 

On October 5, 2011, federal arrest warrants, signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann 

King, were obtained for the following co-conspirators: Rigoberto G. Velez, Javier G. Velez, 

Fermin Alvardo, Timothy Waiter, and Pablo Reyes. Defendant Rigoberto G. Velez was the only 

co-conspirator who was not apprehended or arrested, but Special Agent Michael P. Flynn ofthe 

Drug Enforcement Administration inadvertently filed an arrest warrant returned in Rigoberto G. 

Velez's case. Rigoberto G. Velez has not been arrested and remains a fugitive to date. 

For good cause show, the Government's Motion to Correct the Record is GRANTED 

and the record will so reflect Rigoberto G. Velez's fugitive status. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case: 2:11-cr-00259-ALM Doc #: 54 Filed: 02/06/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
slAlgenon L. Marbley 

ALGENONL.MARBLEY 

United States District Court Judge 

DATED: February 1,2012 

Case: 2:11-cr-00259-ALM Doc #: 54 Filed: 02/06/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Harbor Island Development Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Ross, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Donald Ross By: Donald Ross Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  Dated: July 12, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
June 26, 2015

Mr. David Mason Nobles Consulting Group
2844 Pablo Avenue Tallahassee, FL 32309

Dear Mr. Mason:

This letter is to inform you that we are unabl e to process your request for an exemption from part 21 and §§ 45.23, 45.29, 61.23, 61.3, 61.113(a) and (b), 61.133(a), 91.7(a), 91.9, 91.109(a), 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203, 91.405(a), 91.4 07(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Re gulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your April 27, 2015, exemption requ est on behalf of Nobles Consulting Group into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1510), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requi res you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additiona l time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:11-cr-234

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

NATHAN J. MICKELSON,

Defendant.

ORDER

On October 12, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Nathan J Mickelson’s

guilty plea to Count One of the Amended Information charging him with Possession of Visual

Depictions of Child Pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C §§ 2252(a)(4)(B). 

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District

Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of

Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis

in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 10 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:11-cr-00234-GCS Doc #: 24 Filed: 11/03/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS 

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Amended Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged

guilty of Possession of Visual Depictions of Child Pornographyin violation of 18 U.S.C §§

2252(a)(4)(B). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:11-cr-00234-GCS Doc #: 24 Filed: 11/03/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>