alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TERRANCE KLINE, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Petitioner v Honorable STANLEY R. RESOR, Secretary of the Army, and JOHN C. TILLSON, III, Major General, Commanding General, Fort Gordon, Georgia, Respondents

19 USCMA 288, 41 CMR 288

Miscellaneous Docket No. 70-10

March 11, 1970

Memorandum Opinion of the Court

Acting on behalf of petitioner, Private First Class Kline, Peter E. Rindskopf, Esquire, Captain Clarence E. Knight, and First Lieutenant David Ross Rosenfeld have submitted a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

The petition alleges that charges involving utterances allegedly made with intent to promote disloyalty and disaffection among troops have been preferred against petitioner and have been referred to trial by special court-martial. Petitioner is neither in confinement nor under arrest, but has been restricted to his company area pending trial.

We need not decide whether habeas corpus may ever be used to test the validity of a restriction as broad as that imposed on petitioner. As in Horner v Resor, Miscellaneous Docket No. 70-11, decided this date, arising out of the same set of circumstances, no basis is presented warranting the invocation of this Court’s powers conferred by the All Writs Act, 28 USC §1651 (a).

Accordingly, the petition is denied.
**Docket No. F AA** **- 2012**  **- 0270**  

### Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  5/12/11 --- **Regional Airline Association Conn**  **ie Arnold**  5/12/11 --- **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  5/12/11 --- **ATA Joe White**  5/12/11 ---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Greenhouse Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Grischenko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Michael Grischenko                                                                           

Michael Grischenko,

Chief Executive Officer

 

Dated: May 13, 2011

 

 

----
1

The Honorable Frederick R. Buckles, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-2725

___________

Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: January 23, 2003

 Filed: January 28, 2003

___________

Before BYE, FAGG, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jessie Benford appeals from the district court’s1

 order granting judgment as a

matter of law (JAML) in his employment discrimination action. Having reviewed de

novo the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree with the district court’s bases for

granting JAML to Home Depot. See Arabian Agric. Servs. Co. v. Chief Indus., Inc.,

309 F.3d 479, 482 (8th Cir. 2002) (de novo review of JAML; JAML should not be
-2-

granted unless party has been fully heard on issue and there is no legally sufficient

evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for that party on that issue).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

February 1, 2001

Scanvec Amiable Incorporated
International Plaza Two
Suite 625
Philadelphia, PA 19113-1518

      Adobe Systems Incorporated hereby extends the term of the Configurable
PostScript Interpreter OEM License Agreement between Scanvec Amiable
Incorporated (formerly known as Amiable Technologies Incorporated) and Adobe,
effective February 7, 1997 (the "Agreement") from its current expiration date of
February 7, 2001 to February 7, 2002.

      All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

      Please have the two enclosed originals of this letter signed to
acknowledge Scanvec Amiable Incorporated's agreement with the above and return
two fully executed originals to Adobe for signature.

                                          AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED                    SCANVEC AMIABLE INC.

                                          (formerly known as Amiable
                                          Technologies Incorporated)


By: /s/ Graham Freeman                    By: /s/ Gerald J. Kochanski
    --------------------------            --------------------------------------

Print                                     Print
Name: G Freeman                           Name: Gerald J. Kochanski
      ------------------------                  --------------------------------

Title: Sr VP, WWS                         Title: CFO + Vice President
       -----------------------                   -------------------------------

Date: 2/21/01                             Date: February 6, 2001
      ------------------------                  --------------------------------
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40959 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ALBINO OCAMPO

- ABARCA, also known as David Mata , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 778

- 1

Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Albino Ocampo

Abarca has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ocampo

- Abarca h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 17, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40959 Document: 00512666123 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2014No. 13

- 40959

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, c ounsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40959 Document: 00512666123 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2014
No. 44114.

#### Protests 718775-G/9997, etc., of H. Grabenheimer & Sons, Inc., et al. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 



RSM Richter S.E.N.C.R.L./LLP
Comptables agréés
Chartered Accountants

2,
Place Alexis Nihon
Montréal (Québec) H3Z 3C2
Téléphone / Telephone: 514.934.3400
Télécopieur / Facsimile: 514.934.3408
www.rsmrichter.com



Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form- S-8 of
IntelGenx Technologies Corp. of our report dated March 23, 2009 relating to our
audits of the financial statements of IntelGenx Technologies Corp. (Formerly Big
Flash Corporation) as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of IntelGenx Technologies Corp.
for the year ended December 31, 2008.

RSM Richter LLP (Signed)

Chartered Accountants

Montreal, Canada
March 24, 2009





|RSMRichter S.E.N.C.R.L. est un cabinet indépendant membre de                                               | RSMRichter LLP is an independent member firm of                                      
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|RSMInternational, association de cabinets indépendants 
    dexpertise comptable et de services conseils. | RSMInternational, an affiliation of independent accounting 
    and consulting firms.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Oraco Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven A. Subick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Steven A. SubickSteven A. SubickChief Executive OfficerFebruary 25, 2011
No. 51076.

#### Protests 49453-K, etc., of J. S. Hoffman Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the following allowances were made to compensate for the weight of the inedible substance on the outside of the cheese: (1) 2)4 percent for the cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146 and Abstract 48269; and (2) 1 percent for the cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*The protests were sustained to this extent.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499]


 STP Nuclear Operating Company; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of STP Nuclear Operating Company (the licensee) to withdraw 
its January 31, 2006, application for proposed amendments to Facility 
Operating Licenses numbered NPF-76 and NPF-80, respectively, for the 
South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2, located in Matagorda County. The 
proposed amendments would have revised the Technical Specification 
3.8.3.1, ``Onsite Power Distribution--Operating.''
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendments published in the Federal Register on February 
28, 2006 (71 FR 10077). However, by letter dated March 26, 2007, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated January 31, 2006, and the licensee's 
letter dated March 26, 2007, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the 
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 
Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically 
from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) 
Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, 
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Persons who do not have access to 
ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in 
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-
397-4209, or 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#562632241638243578313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="35455147755b47561b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of March 2007.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mohan C. Thadani,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, Division of 
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E7-6086 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 63187.

#### King Shipping Company *v.*United States,

protest 68/18514 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the Report) of Full Circle Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, William E. Vastardis, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  /s/ William E. VastardisName:

          

          William E. VastardisDate:

          

          September 20, 2011
Update Fields I 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, propeller, appliance) (e.g., Inspection, Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

I pt'l IIIli! ll"p;lll 

I·. 

The known number of products in compliance: l\ d 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

Costs covered under wan·anty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: G 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and close- up) 

Inspection 

7 
Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ® 

YES* D NO IZl 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* D 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. G 

YES D NO IZl 

Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ® 

YES* 0 NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

8
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*The Equitable Fire and Marine Insurance Company of Providence, Rhode Island, *v.*Charles G. Fairman, *as Superintendent of the Insurance Department, State of New York.*

Order affirmed, with costs.
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Robert J. Zatta,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form10-Q of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 21, 2007         |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| /s/ ROBERT J.  ZATTA       |   |
| Robert J. Zatta            |
| Senior Vice  President and |
| Chief Financial  Officer   |

 

----
Before the Third Division,

January 30, 1943

No. 47974.

#### Protest 71898-K of Duttons, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record shows that the paintings or drawings in question were created for, and intended to be used as, illustrations for a poem entitled “Scotland.” Following *American Colortype Co.*v. *United States*(2 Cust. Ct. 132, C. D. 107) and *Tice & Lynch, Inc.*v. *United States*(4 id. 84, C. D. 292) the protest was overruled.
Exhibit 31.1





Certifications











I, Ryan C. Farris, certify that:





1I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Master Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and U.S. Bank Trust National Association.





Date: March 24, 2017





/s/ Ryan C. Farris





Ryan C. Farris


President, Ally Wholesale Enterprises LLC, as Depositor


(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)





























1
**Exhibit      32(a)**

**TXU      ENERGY COMPANY LLC**

**Certificate      Pursuant to Section 906 **

**of      Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CEO**

| 1.   | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006                (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         |                                                                                                                                                         |
|    |                                                                                                                                                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|         |                                                                                                                                                         |                                   /s/  M. S. Greene        |
|         | Name:          M. S.              Greene                                                                        |
|         | Title:            Chairman              of the Board, President and Chief              Executive |