alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, John R. Tuttle, President and Chief Executive Officer of DayStar Technologies, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DayStar Technologies, Inc. for the three months ended June 30, 2006; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 11, 2006
#### In the Matter of the Petition of the New York Elevated R. R. Co. *In re*Sobel *et al.*

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,*

*Filed January 24, 1890.)*

Eminent domain—Evidence.

The commissioners appointed to appraise land taken for railroad purposes are not to be governed in the receipt of evidence by the strict rules obtaining in a court, and the admission by them of evidence which could not be received by a court is not necessarily fatal to their determination.

Appeal from order confirming award and appraisal of commissioners.

*Henry S. Sedgwick, Jr.,*for appl’ts; *W. G. Beckham,*for resp’ts.

Yan Brunt, P. J.

Upon examination of the record in this case it would appear that the principal ground of appeal is that the commissioners assessed the permanent damages at a sum higher than the court had done upon the trial of the question in court.

The points urged in support of the appeal are that the commissioners received improper testimony and such as could not be received by a court.

The rule is well settled that commissioners appointed in proceedings such as the one at bar are not to be governed in the receipt of evidence by the strict rules obtaining in a court. Indeed, the statute says that they shall not be. They may go and view the premises and upon the knowledge thus acquired base their award.

Such commissioners are usually composed mostly of laymen and cannot be supposed to know the rules of evidence, and unless they have pursued a course which has plainly been detrimental to the interests of the party appealing, and their award is manifestly unjust, it will not be interfered with. The commissioners are not like other tribunals to be governed exclusively by the evidence produced before them, but may as has already been said base their judgment upon conclusions formed upon a personal inspection of the premises. *N.Y.,L.& W. R. Co.*v. *Arnot,*27 Hun, 122.

We think that commissioners have a wider range and a larger *191discretion in the receipt of evidence than courts, and upon none of the points questioned do they seem to have exceeded that discretion.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Brady and Daniels, JJ., concur.
No. 57400.

protest 196754-K (New York).

#### International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
NORTHWEST ALABAMA REGIONAL AIRPORT 

1729 T. Ed Campbell Drive, Suite A, Muscle Shoals, Alabama 35661-2016 

Phone: (256) 381-2869 Fax: (256) 381-2915 

flymsl@aol.com www.flytheshoals.com 

SERVING THE SHOALS! 

May 4, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Reference: r::.- DOT -OST -2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, 2000-7856 r'0 

EAS>Muscle Shoals, AL, Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS and Tupelo, MS 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

The Northwest Alabama Regional Airport Authority wishes to lend its support to the proposal of Silver 

Airways to provide essential air service at Muscle Shoals, Alabama as replacement for current Delta Air 

Lines service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air transportation 

system is critical to the economic well-being of Muscle Shoals, Alabama and to the Northwest Alabama 

Regional Airport Authority. The Northwest Alabama Regional Airport Authority and the communities of 

North Alabama rely on our local air service for both business and leisure travel. 

The Silver Airways proposals offer us a modem 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, which is 

not only the largest hub airport in the world, but also a popular business and leisure travel destination 

from the Northwest Alabama Regional Airport in its own right. 

The Northwest Alabama Regional Airport Authority believes the Silver air service proposal represents the 

best option for retaining our local air service long term and building up traffic so that government 

subsidies can eventually be reduced or eliminated. 

The Northwest Alabama Regional Airport Authority urges that the Department of Transportation toward 

the Silver Airways designation to provide Muscle Shoals, Alabama essential air service. 

Best regards, 

Rick Elliott 

Chairman 

Northwest Alabama Regional Airport Authority 

Cc: Congressman Robert Alderholt 

Congressman Mo Brooks 

Senator Jeff Sessions 

Senator Richard Shelby 

Governor Robert Bentley
#### State, *ex rel.*J. A. Bechard, v. E. B. Leatherman, as Clerk of the Circuit Court, Dade County.

176 So. 563.

Opinion Filed October 7, 1937.

*Joseph Weintraub*and *Norris F. Baskin,*for Relator.

*Bart A. Riley,*for Respondent.

*Albert B. Bernstein,*as *Amicus Curiae.*

*586Terrell, J.

This is a proceeding in Mandamus in which the identical and some additional questions are raised to those considered in James Messer, Sr., v. PauhV. Lang, *et al.,*decided this date. It is first suggested that the constitutional questions raised should not be answered because relator is attempting to substitute mandamus for writ of error.

We pretermit any discussion'or expression of opinion on this point for the reason that at the time the alternative writ was issued, it was brought to the attention of the Court that the questions involved were similar to those raised in the last cited case so the writ was granted on the theory that they were companion cases and would be disposed of together.

On examination of the record, we find the main questions raised to be identical with those raised and considered in James Messer, Sr., v. Paul V. Lang, *et al.,*decided this date so what we said in that case is conclusive of and disposes of them.

The additional questions raised in this case are that Chapter 18296, Acts of 1937, (1) pledges the State’s credit con- ■ trary to Section 10 of Article IX of the Constitution, (2) embraces more than one subject and matter properly connected therewith contrary to Section 16 of Article III of the Constitution, and (3) violates Article II of the Constitution in that it delegates powers to one department properly belonging to the other.

These questions have been examined but we think they are all concluded by Ridgeway v. Peacock, 100 Fla. 1297, 131 So. 140 and other cases cited in the companion case of James Messer, Sr., v. Paul V. Lang, *et al.,*or if not so concluded, they are without merit. We have not over*587looked the division of questions in brief of Weintraub and Baskin and other counsel who appeared in these cases.

The motion for peremptory writ of mandamus is accor.dingly granted.'

It is so ordered.

Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8632 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8632

 To require the Secretary of the Interior to withdraw a proposed rule 
  relating to the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental 
             health of the National Wildlife Refuge System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2024

  Mr. Grothman (for himself and Mr. Tiffany) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of the Interior to withdraw a proposed rule 
  relating to the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental 
             health of the National Wildlife Refuge System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Biodiversity Oversight Scaled-back 
And Fully Erased Act of 2024'' or ``BIOSAFE Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSED RULE RELATING TO NATIONAL WILDLIFE 
              REFUGE SYSTEM.

    The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the 
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall withdraw the proposed 
rule titled ``National Wildlife Refuge System; Biological Integrity, 
Diversity, and Environmental Health'' (89 Fed. Reg. 7345; published 
February 2, 2024).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2


         Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Barry Thomas, and CEO of Global 1 Investment Holding
Corporation. a Georgia corporation, hereby makes the following certification as
required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to
the following of this quarterly report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007.

The undersigned certifies that the above periodic report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of Silver Screen Studios, Inc. and results of
its operations.

By:/s/ Barry Thomas
   ----------------
Barry Thomas, CEO and  Director

August 8, 2007
No. 46828.

#### Protest 34862-K of Kirsch Bros. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with the reports of the chemist, together with the testimony of the exporter that the importer refused to accept all the fish in this lot because its moisture content was more than 43 percent, the court found that the fish in question contained more than 43 percent moisture. In accordance therewith the so-called “medium” codfish was held dutiable at three-fourths of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 719 (2) as claimed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4154

_____________________________
J OSEPH N IEVES , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

. April 3, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , R AY , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven Seliger and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defenders, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney Gene ral, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
No. 55364.

#### Wypenn Oil Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 134001-K (Seattle).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8743 

To amend subpart 2 of part B of title IV of the Social Security Act to 

promote permanency for youth by strengthening support networks for 

children, youth, and families at risk of entering the child welfare system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2024 

Mr. SMUCKER (for himself and Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend subpart 2 of part B of title IV of the Social 

Security Act to promote permanency for youth by 

strengthening support networks for children, youth, and 

families at risk of entering the child welfare system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Empowering Kinship 

5 Caregivers and Youth through Title IV–B Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTATION OF DEFINITIONS. 

7 Section 431(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 629a(a)) is amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8743 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

2 (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph 

3 (A)— 

4 (i) by striking ‘‘children’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘children, youth,’’; and 

6 (ii) by striking ‘‘adoptive and ex7 tended’’ and inserting ‘‘kinship and adop8 tive’’; 

9 (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘par10 ents and other caregivers (including foster par11 ents)’’ and inserting ‘‘parents, kinship care12 givers, and foster parents’’ ; 

13 (C) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub14 paragraph (E); 

15 (D) by striking the period at the end of 

16 subparagraph (F) and inserting ‘‘ ; and’’; and 

17 (E) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(G) peer-to-peer mentoring and support 

19 programs designed to help children and families 

20 learn from others with direct experience or 

21 interactions with the child welfare system.’’; 

22 (2) in paragraph (2)(B)— 

23 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘children’’ 

24 and inserting ‘‘children, youth,’’; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8743 IH

1 (B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘extended’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘kinship’’; 

3 (3) in paragraph (7)(A), by inserting ‘‘with kin4 ship caregivers or’’ before ‘‘in a foster family home’’; 

5 and 

6 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(10) YOUTH.—The term ‘youth’ means indi8 viduals who have not attained 26 years of age.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8646 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8646

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements to 
the provision of on-campus educational and vocational counseling by the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2024

Mr. Van Orden introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements to 
the provision of on-campus educational and vocational counseling by the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Modernizing the Veterans On-Campus 
Experience Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ON-CAMPUS EDUCATIONAL AND 
              VOCATIONAL COUNSELING.

    Section 3697B(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``The Secretary'';
            (2) by striking ``employees of the Department who provide 
        such services under section 3697A of this title.'' and 
        inserting ``an employee of the Department who holds a bachelors 
        degree or a more advanced degree in a relevant field of 
        study.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) An employee of the Department who provides counseling 
services under this section--
            ``(A) may provide such services on the campuses of more 
        than one institution of higher learning; and
            ``(B) may not provide such services to more than a total of 
        25 individuals at any one time.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UCDP FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tracey
L. Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 7, 2008



By:

/s/ Tracey L. StockwellTracey L. Stockwell Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of 800 Northern Corp. et al., Appellants, v Mary J. Davies et al., Respondents, and Joseph Biello et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

[635 NYS2d 498]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Zoning and Appeals of the Town of North Hemp-stead, dated November 17, 1993, which, after a hearing, granted use and area variances to Joseph Biello and Ed De-Benedetto, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), entered July 7,1994, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Joseph Biello and Ed DeBenedetto sought use and area variances to allow them to construct a new building to be used as a car wash facility. After the Board of Zoning and Appeals of the Town of North Hempstead (hereinafter the Board) granted the variances, two neighboring businesses, as well as an individual resident in the immediate area, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the Board’s actions as arbitrary and capricious. The Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding.

We agree with the Supreme Court’s determination that the Board’s determination to grant the variances was neither arbitrary nor capricious and was supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley,*45 NY2d 441; *Matter of Green v Scheyer,*205 AD2d 535).

We have examined the appellants’ remaining claims and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Copertino and Hart, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v EMMITT L. WHITE, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

18 USCMA 399, 40 CMR 111

No. 21,707

June 13, 1969

*Lieutenant Norman A. Wulf,*JAGC, USNR, argued the cause for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Anthony A. Derezinski,*JAGC, USNR, argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were *Colonel C. R. La-rouche,*USMC, and *Lieutenant Matthew J. Wheeler, Jr.,*JAGC, USN.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

This is the companion case to United States v Goins, 18 USCMA 395, 40 CMR 107. Appellant White, a coactor with Goins in the robbery and maiming of their victim, Sergeant Collier, pleaded guilty at his separate trial to both offenses, violations of Articles 122 and 124, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 922 and 924, respectively. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for fifteen years, In response to a pretrial agreement, the convening authority then reduced the confinement portion of the sentence to ten years but otherwise approved. A Navy board of review affirmed the findings and sentence.

Here, as in *Goins,*a decision is required on whether the offenses of robbery and maiming are multiplicious for sentencing purposes because the force and violence necessary to prove robbery are also the cause of the permanent damage constituting maiming.

*400For the reasons there given, we here find that the law officer did not err in treating these charges separate for sentencing.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

FERGUSON, Judge

(concurring in the result):

I concur in the result.

See my separate concurrence in the result in United States v Goins, 18 .USCMA 895, 399, 40 CMR 107, 111, a companion to this case.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TODD ELLIS CARTER JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 100 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.