alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hines Real Estate Investment
Trust, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2006
    
    /s/ Sherri W. SchugartSherri W. SchugartChief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-21-00028-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.M.B.

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-EM5-06049

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 20, 2022

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant C.B.1 appeals from the trial court’s Order in Suit Affecting the Parent-Child 

Relationship. On February 18, 2022, we ordered Appellant C.B. to provide written proof to this 

court on or before February 28, 2022 that she had paid the required fee to the court reporter for 

preparation of the reporter’s record. We explained that if Appellant C.B. failed to respond within 

the time provided, her appellant’s brief would be due March 21, 2022, and we would only consider 

those issues or points raised in her brief that did not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

1

To protect the identity of the minor child, we refer to the parties by fictitious names, initials, or aliases. See TEX.

FAM. CODE § 109.002(d).
04-21-00028-CV

- 2 -

Appellant C.B. did not respond to our February 18, 2022 order. Therefore, her appellant’s 

brief was due March 21, 2002. On March 22, 2022, when she did not file her brief, we ordered 

Appellant C.B. to file, on or before April 6, 2022, her appellant’s brief and a written response 

reasonably explaining (1) her failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee is not significantly 

injured by her failure to timely file a brief. We explained that if Appellant C.B. failed to file a brief 

and the written response by April 6, 2022, her appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if 

appellant has failed to comply with a court order).

Appellant C.B. has failed to respond to our March 22, 2022 order. Therefore, we dismiss 

her appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(c).

PER CURIAM
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8793 

To gather data on adoptions from foster care and assess the effectiveness 

of post-adoption services and resources provided to the families, in order 

to identify gaps in accessible services and inform strategic investments 

and improve outcomes for adopted children and their families. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2024 

Mr. WENSTRUP (for himself and Mr. SMUCKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To gather data on adoptions from foster care and assess 

the effectiveness of post-adoption services and resources 

provided to the families, in order to identify gaps in 

accessible services and inform strategic investments and 

improve outcomes for adopted children and their families. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foster Care Adoption 

5 Oversight and Support Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8793 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON FOSTER CARE ADOPTION OVERSIGHT 

2 AND SUPPORT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Within 18 months after the date 

4 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and 

5 Human Services shall prepare and submit to the Com6 mittee on Ways and Means of the House of Representa7 tives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate a writ8 ten report on children who enter into foster care under 

9 the supervision of a State after prior finalization of an 

10 adoption or legal guardianship. 

11 (b) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The Secretary shall in12 clude in the report— 

13 (1) any information available through the Adop14 tion and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting Sys15 tem deeloped pursuant to section 479 of the Social 

16 Security Act or other data sources on the incidence 

17 of adoption disruption and dissolution affecting chil18 dren described in paragraph (1) and factors associ19 ated with such circumstances, including— 

20 (A) whether affected individuals received 

21 pre- or post-legal adoption services; and 

22 (B) other relevant information, such as the 

23 age of the child involved; and 

24 (2) a summary of— 

25 (A) post-adoption services in each State 

26 that are available to families that adopted chilVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:45 Aug 07, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8793.IH H8793

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8793 IH

1 dren from foster care and the extent to which 

2 the services are evidence-based or evidence-in3 formed; and 

4 (B) funding and funding sources for the 

5 services in each State, including set-asides 

6 under the Promoting Safe and Stable Families 

7 program under part B of title IV of such Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 53101.

#### The Otto Gerdau Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 85666-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *The Otto Gerdau Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 24, C. D. 1120) and *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(id. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 56551.

protests 175152-K (A) and 175152-K (B) (New York).

#### Bellows & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case: 2:10-cv-00988-MHW-MRA Doc #: 22 Filed: 04/12/12 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00988-MHW-MRA Doc #: 22 Filed: 04/12/12 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00988-MHW-MRA Doc #: 22 Filed: 04/12/12 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T14:52:11-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Global Energy Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A
for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.June 9, 2005 /s/ John R. BaileyJohn R. Bailey,Interim Chief Executive Officer, President,
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of JohnsonDiversey Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                              
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2006 |  | /s/    Edward F. Lonergan                                    
|                   |  | Edward F. Lonergan, President and Chief Executive Officer    
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/    Joseph F. Smorada                                     
|                   |  | Joseph F. Smorada, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Gryphon Gold Corporation, (the Company) does hereby
certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2010

/s/ Matthew A.
FowlerMatthew A. Fowler Interim Chief Financial Officer, Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.

---
#### Commonwealth *v.*Johnson, Appellant.

Submitted May 26, 1969.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*Riehard D. Walker,*Public Defender, for appellant.

*Jerome T. Fgerster,*Assistant District Attorney, and *LeRoy S. Zimmerman,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

October 9, 1969:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
November 18, 2022
No. 04

- 22

- 00319

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF E.G.M., A CHILD
From the 25th Judicial District Court , Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20

- 0604

- CV

- C Honorable William D. Old III , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s brief is due on November 18 , 2022. On November 16 , 2022, appellant filed a motion to reconsider appellant’s unopposed second motion to extend time

. The motion is GRANTED

. A ppellant ’s brief is due no later than November 23, 2022

. Further requests for extensions of time to file appellant’s brief will not be considered

.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court o n this 18th day of November, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-14-00009-CV

____________________

HENRY STEPP III, Appellant

V.

JEFF STEPP, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-10-10769 CV 

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Henry Stepp III filed a notice of appeal on January 7, 2014, seeking to 

appeal an order denying an application for protective order. With respect to 

Henry’s appeal, the record, due to be filed on February 6, 2014, was not filed. We 

notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution 

unless arrangements were made to file the record or Henry explained why 

additional time was needed to file the record. Henry did not respond to the Court’s 

notice. On March 20, 2014, we warned Henry that the appeal would be dismissed 
2

unless on or before March 31, 2014, he arranged to pay for the record, filed an 

affidavit of indigence, or showed that he could not be charged a fee for the 

appellate record. Henry did not respond to the Court’s notice by the date specified 

in the clerk’s notice.

Henry failed to comply with a notice from the clerk that required a response 

or other action within a specific time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The appeal is 

dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON

 Justice

Opinion Delivered April 10, 2014

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION**

|   | 1. | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended                September 30, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
No. 60921.

#### J. H. Brown *v.*United States,

protest 202567-K (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed as untimely.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5926]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

(Docket 8-2007)


Foreign-Trade Zone 183 - Austin, Texas, Expansion of 
Manufacturing Authority -- Subzone 183B, Samsung Austin Semiconductor 
L.L.C., Correction

    The Federal Register notice published on March 20, 2007 (72 FR 
13081-) describing the application by the Foreign-Trade Zone of Central 
Texas, Inc., grantee of FTZ 183, requesting an expansion of the scope 
of manufacturing authority conducted under zone procedures within 
Subzone 183B at the Samsung Austin Semiconductor L.L.C. facility in 
Austin, Texas, is corrected as follows:
    In paragraph 2, beginning on the 13th line, the text that reads 
``Site 3--Three Way Inc. facilities (1.9 acres; 50,000 sq. ft.)--
located at 4009 Commercial Center Drive in Austin'' should be corrected 
to read ``Site 3--Three Way Logistics facilities (1.9 acres; 50,000 sq. 
ft.) - located at 8410 Tuscany Way in Austin''.

    Dated: March 26, 2007.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5926 Filed 3-30-02; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510-DS-S
No. 53638.

protests 121924-K, etc. (New York).

#### British West Indies Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit No. 4.4



                                     SUMMARY
                                       OF
                       ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
                             2000 LAUNCH BONUS PLAN


         In recognition of the dedication and hard work of employees of EchoStar
Communications Corporation (the "Corporation") and its subsidiaries in
anticipation of the launch of EchoStar VI, the Board of Directors of the
Corporation shall award ten (10) shares of the Corporation's Class A Common
Stock, $0.01 par value per share to each eligible employee. Eligible employees
include full-time employees of the Corporation or one of its subsidiaries, with
a hire date on or before April 1, 2000 and part-time employees of the
Corporation or one of its subsidiaries with a hire date on or before April 1,
2000 who had worked at least 500 hours in the past six (6) months and for at
least 1,000 hours from April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001. All eligible employees
must have also been continuously employed with the Corporation or one of its
subsidiaries from April 1, 2000 through March 31, 2001 and be in good standing
as of March 31, 2001. The award is a special one-time grant. Issuance of the
shares will be contingent on the successful launch and operation of EchoStar VI
and will also be contingent on there being no insurance claims and no losses
prior to the stock grant date related to EchoStar VI including in-orbit
performance.
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

#### CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

####  

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofNorcross Safety Products L.L.C. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended October 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David F. Myers, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of theRegistrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated:  November 15, 2005 | By:    | /s/ DAVID F. MYERS, JR.                            |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   | David F. Myers, Jr.                                |
|                           |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                           |   | Secretary and Manager                              |
|                           |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)       |

 

 

**A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will beretained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
Before the Second Division,

March 20, 1951

No. 55371.

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co. *v.*United States,

protest 156443-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.