alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5680] 

*Renewal of Advisory Committee.*                     The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy. The Committee serves in a solely advisory capacity concerning major issues and problems in international economic policy. The Committee provides information and advice on the effective integration of economic interests into overall foreign policy and on the Department of State's role in advancing American commercial interests in a competitive global economy. The Committee also appraises the role and limits of international economic institutions and advises on the formulation of U.S. economic policy and positions.                 

This Committee includes representatives of American organizations and institutions having an interest in international economic policy, including representatives of American business, labor unions, public interest groups, and trade and professional associations. The Committee meets at least annually to advise the Department on the full range of international economic policies and issues. 

For further information, please call Nancy Smith-Nissley, Senior Coordinator, Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public Diplomacy, Economic, Energy and Business Bureau, U.S. Department of State, at (202) 647-1682. 

Dated: February 20, 2007. 

David Burnett, 

Director, Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public Diplomacy, Bureau of Economic, Energy and Business Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E7-5806 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lorne Lilley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sunergy, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sunergy, Inc.



Date:  May 14, 2007

By:  ____________________________________



Lorne Lilley, Secretary, Treasurer and



principal accounting officer
Exhibit 35.2

Servicer Compliance Statement

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Navient Solutions, Inc., the Administrator and Servicer for the Student Loan Corporation Trusts1 (the Trusts), does hereby certify that:

(a) this certificate is delivered
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB;

(b) a review of the servicing activities of the Servicer and the Administrator as of
December 31, 2015 and for the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) and their performance under the applicable servicing and administration agreements for each of the Trusts has been made
under my supervision; and

(c) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer and Administrator have fulfilled all of
their obligations under the servicing and administration agreements for the Trusts in all material respects through the Reporting Period.

[Signature Page Follows]



|1 | SLC Student Loan Trust 2004-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-3, SLC Student Loan Trust 2006-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2006-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2007-1,
SLC Student Loan Trust 2007-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2008-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2008-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2009-1, SLC Student Loan Trust 2009-2, SLC Student Loan Trust 2009-3, and SLC Student Loan Trust 2010-1.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

|                                                                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                                      
|/S/ JOHN F. WHORLEY, JR.                                                                                                              
|John F. Whorley, Jr. Executive Vice
President & Group President, Asset Management and Servicing
Navient Solutions, Inc. March 30, 2016

Servicer Compliance Statement
Cáse No. 9,868.

#### MORTIMER v. ROSSTEUSCHER.

[This was a decision by one of the courts of Dakota Territory. See 1 West Jur. 359.]
#### Frances B. Stimson, Pl’ff, *v.*James A. Stimson, Def't.

*(Supreme Court, Special Term, Albany County,*

*Filed January 28, 1890.)*

Venue—Motion to betain.

A motion to retain the venue for the convenience of witnesses cannot overcome the right of the defendant to have it changed to the proper 'county.

Action for divorce. The venue was laid in Albany county. The defendant moved to change the place of trial to Montgomery county on the ground that that was the proper county, neither party residing in Albany county. The further facts appear in the opinion.

*P. D.*Niver, for pl’ff; *Z. S. Westbrook,*for def’t.

Learned, J.

The plaintiff resides in Saratoga county. The defendant in Montgomery. The venue is laid in Albany. The defendant moves to change to Montgomery. He is undoubtedly entitled to have the motion granted, unless the plaintiff’s counter motion can prevail. After defendant had served his notice of motion, plaintiff served affidavit and notice of motion to be heard at the same time and place to retain the venue at Albany for convenience of witnesses, showing enough necessary witnesses. The defendant shows no witnesses in opposition, but insists that the motion cannot be heard here; that he is entitled to the change of venue, even if plaintiff may be afterwards entitled to move the venue back for convenience of witnesses.

*Veeder*v. Baker, 83 N. Y., 161, does not quite determine the question. For in that case the affidavits showing convenience of witnesses were read simply in opposition to the motion to change to the proper county. Here there is an independent motion.

Still, the intimation in that case is quite strong, and this consideration may be taken into account. A motion to change venue because the action is not in the proper county may be made before service of answer. Code, § 986. A motion to change for convenience of witnesses must be after issue of fact joined, that it may be seen what the issues are. Then, in the present case, an answer has been served. But the practice must be uniform in all cases whether an answer is served or not.

I think, therefore, it is best to adhere to the regular practice, notwithstanding *Mason*v. Burns, 6 How. Pr., 481. ' The plaintiff can move to change to Albany for convenience of witnesses. The court of appeals seem to think that “ change ” does not include “retain.”

*22Motion to change venue granted, with ten dollars costs.

Motion to retain venue in Albany denied, without costs and with leave to renew.
#### Walter E. Lawton, *Appellant, v.*The New York Extracting and Fertilizer Manufacturing Company, *Respondent.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
EX-31.1
        RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF JOHN FLEMING

               RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, John Fleming, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of
GameZnFlix, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for
the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: January 7, 2005                 /s/ John Fleming
                                       John Fleming, CEO
#### Kwan H. Chung, Appellant, v Physicians Reciprocal Insurers, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[635 NYS2d 555]

—Order reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Same Memorandum as in *Chung v Physicians Reciprocal Insurers*(221 AD2d 907 [decided herewith]).

All concur except Green, J. P., and Lawton, J., who dissent and vote to affirm for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Galloway, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J.—Renewal.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
#### Henry C. Ballou, Ex’r, Resp’t, v. Thomas Carton *et al.,*App’lts.

Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Daniel Meyers, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Dated: February 9, 2009/s/ DANIEL MEYERS Daniel Meyers
Chief Executive Officer and President


---



QuickLinks
No. 41891.

#### Protest 177949-G of American Express Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of laces similar to those involved in *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was sustained.
**Exhibit 32**
**CERTIFICATION**
Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Christopher Naughton,the President and Chief Executive Officer of Marshall Edwards, Inc. (the“registrant”), and David R. Seaton, the Chief Financial Officer of theregistrant, each hereby certifies that, to his or her knowledge:
1. The registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the“Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end ofthe period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of theregistrant for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
These certifications accompany the Form 10-Q to which they relate, are notdeemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespectiveof any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Dated: May 12, 2004   /s/ CHRISTOPHER NAUGHTON /s/ DAVID SEATON Christopher Naughton David R. SeatonChief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
27
#### Grow & Cuttle, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6642.

Entry No. 1673, etc.

'Invoices dated London, England, July 10, 1944, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., November 21, 1944, etc.

(Decided December 18, 1946)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Presiding Judge:

The appeals'for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis f.or the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Innovative Product Opportunities Inc, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


DATE: March 29, 2011


/s/ Doug Clark
-----------------------------------------
Doug Clark, Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Executive Officer, President,
Chairman of the Board and Director



/s/ Robert McLean
-----------------------------------------
Robert McLean, Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

<PAGE>
No. 58138.

protests 217522-K and 210525-K (Los Angeles).

#### Standard Oil Company of California and Guy B. Barham Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel A. P. I. casings the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 32, C. D. 1577), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### Sophie E. Minton, Resp’t, *v.*The New York Elevated R. R. Co. *et*al., App’lts.

*(New York Superior Court, General Term,*

*Filed January 6, 1890.)*

Trespass—Owner op easements mat maintain.

An owner of-easements may maintain an action against an elevated railroad for interference therewith, although he does not own the fee of the premises.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment perpetually enjoining the maintenance of an elevated railway, and awarding the sum of *528$6,148.62 damages and costs. The judgment also provides an alternative to the injunction by the defendants paying the plaintiff $9,500 as the price of the easements appurtenant to his premises, Ños. 95 and 97 Pearl street, taken by the maintenance of the railway.

Appellants contend that the interest of plaintiff in the premises is not that of an owner in fee, but simply that of an assignee of a mortgage.

Eespondent contends that it is quite immaterial whether Miss Minton had the fee or not. She has easements.

*Davies &*Bapallo, for app’lts; *G. W. Van Ness,*for resp’t

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Freedman and Ingraham, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Donald C. Evans, CEO of Silver Screen Studios, Inc., pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.)


I, Donald C. Evans, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silver Screen
Studios, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: August 12, 2006 By:/s/ Donald C.
Evans Donald C. Evans, acting CEO and a acting Director


By:     /s/ Donald C. Evans
        -------------------
        Donald C. Evans, acting CEO and an acting Director
Date:   August 12, 2006
(Reap. Dec. 8496)

#### Chemi-Cal Sales Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 8130.

(Decided November 25, 1955)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ekwall, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement filed under authority of section 601 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The merchandise consists of naphthalene imported at the port of Los Angeles, Calif. When the case was called for hearing, Government counsel moved to dismiss for lack of prosecution. The court ordered the case submitted on the record. An examination of the record fails to disclose evidence to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the appraiser’s action. I, therefore, find and hold that the values found by the appraiser are the proper values of the merchandise covered by the appeal.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 58140.

protests 218143-K, etc. (New York).

#### Columbia Tire Co. and Joseph F. Mariano et al. *v.*United States,

*515Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of speedometers and parts thereof similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *Industrial Operations, Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 82, C. D. 1500), except that the speedometers and parts thereof in the cited case were designed and intended for use as parts of motorcycles whereas those at bar are intended for use as parts of automobiles, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.