alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION** **PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Michael A. Carrazza, certify that,

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc.; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| Date: April 29, 2019 | /s/ Michael A. Carrazza                                                                        |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Michael A. Carrazza                                                                            |
|                      | Chairman of the Board of Directors

and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |
(Reap. Dec. 10505)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 26047, etc.

(Decided April 14, 1963)

*Stein & Sliostafo*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, consists of Christmas Tree Light Sets, exported from Japan; and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values net packed, plus all extra packing charges shown on the invoices.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise the subject of this stipulation is not included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in See. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> *465IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for reap-praisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for a decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question and that such value in each case is the invoice unit value, net, packed, plus all extra packing charges shown on the invoices.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Stephan Kuppenheimer, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc., on behalf of Public STEERS(R) Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


Date:  March 29, 2005                          /s/ Stephan Kuppenheimer
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                 President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6702

DUNCAN VICTOR AYEMERE IDOKOGI, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States; JOHN JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-230-L) Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 19, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Duncan Victor Ayemere Idokogi, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Duncan Victor Ayemere Idokogi seeks to appeal the district court’s order transferring his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, and to the extent Idokogi’s petition sought to attack his 1998 state conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) denying his petition as a successive habeas petition. We dismiss the appeal of the order transferring the case for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. SeeTechnosteel, L.L.C. v. Beers Constr. Co. , 271 F.3d 151, 153-54 & n.2 (4th Cir. 2001). We also dismiss the appeal of that part of the district court’s order that denied Idokogi’s petition as a successive habeas petition. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by- 3 - demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Idokogi has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this portion of the appeal. We deny Idokogi’s motions for stay pending appeal and to place the case in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-KSB ofCommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, I,Michael T. Storm, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofCommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best ofmy knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) such Form 10-KSB for the year endedDecember 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-KSBfor the year ended December 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of CommerceFirstBancorp, Inc.

 

 
|  /s/ Michael T. Storm                            |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael T. Storm                                      |
| Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
| March 6, 2008                                    |

 

----
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4968 

To improve the Institutional Development Award program of the National 

Institutes of Health. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To improve the Institutional Development Award program 

of the National Institutes of Health. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘IDeA Reauthorization 

5 Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AWARD PROGRAM. 

7 Section 461(b)(1) of the Public Health Service Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 285k(b)(1)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by adding at the end 

10 the following: ‘‘Such program shall be called the ‘InVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:06 Aug 31, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4968.IS S4968

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4968 IS

1 stitutional Development Award program’ or the 

2 ‘IDeA program’.’’; 

3 (2) by amending subparagraph (B) to read as 

4 follows: 

5 ‘‘(B) The entities referred to in subparagraph 

6 (A) are entities that conduct biomedical or behav7 ioral research and are located in a State that is at 

8 or below the median of all States in aggregate grant 

9 funding from the National Institutes of Health, ex10 cluding funding under this subsection, received by 

11 entities in the State, calculated on a rolling multi12 year average, as determined by the Director of NIH 

13 (referred to in this paragraph as an ‘IDeA State’).’’; 

14 and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(D) The NIH shall submit to Congress, as 

17 part of its Federal budget submission, or make 

18 available through an annually updated, publicly ac19 cessible data source— 

20 ‘‘(i) a description of the strategy and ob21 jectives of the IDeA program; 

22 ‘‘(ii) a description of the awards made 

23 under such program in the previous fiscal year, 

24 including— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4968 IS

1 ‘‘(I) the efforts and accomplishments 

2 to more fully integrate the IDeA States in 

3 major activities and initiatives of the Na4 tional Institutes of Health; 

5 ‘‘(II) the percentage of IDeA program 

6 reviewers who are from IDeA States; and 

7 ‘‘(III) updates on programs or large 

8 collaborator awards involving a partnership 

9 of organizations and institutions from 

10 IDeA States and non-IDeA States; and 

11 ‘‘(iii) a description of gains in academic re12 search quality and in biomedical science human 

13 resource development achieved through the 

14 IDeA program over the last 5 fiscal years.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 57393.

protest 161617-K (San Francisco).

#### Pacific Mutual Sales, Inc. *v.*United States,

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise in this case consists of five cases of ajitsuke-kobumaki, rolled kelp, seasoned. Duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as nonenu-merated manufactured articles. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is free of duty under paragraph 1705 as kelp, or under paragraph 1722 as crude seaweeds, or, if dutiable, it is dutiable at the rate of 5 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1540, as amended by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, either directly or by virtue of the mixed-material clause in paragraph 1559, as “seaweeds, if manufactured or dyed.”

At the trial it was stipulated and agreed between counsel for both sides that the merchandise, ajitsuke-kobumaki, is a rolled, dried kelp, seasoned with sugar and monosodium glutamate, and that inside of each roll is a small piece of herring, the kelp being in chief value.

The same contentions are made in this case as in the case of *North American Food Distributing Co.*v. *United States,*30 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 1532, decided concurrently herewith, and the same briefs cover both cases.

Following the decision of this court in the foregoing case, we hold that the merchandise is properly dutiable as assessed by the collector. Judgment will therefore be entered in favor of the Government.
Exhibit 32.2


Certifications Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Groupon, Inc. ("Groupon") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rich Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Randolfi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Groupon.







By: /s/ Rich Williams


Rich Williams


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





By: /s/ Michael Randolfi


Michael Randolfi


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)





Date:    March 23, 2018
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, certifies that to the best of her knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL
Lifestyle Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, and its results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.



|                   |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | /s/ Tammie A. Quinlan                               
|Date: May 15, 2009 |  | TAMMIE A. QUINLAN                                   
|                   |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000919

20-SEP-2017

08:19 AM
No. 55979.

protests 149837-K, etc. (New York).

#### American Roland Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
COLUMBIA NATIONAL
Incorporated


Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing


RE: Officer's Certificate

(LOGO) CN
Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:

(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
    preceding  fiscal  year under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
    Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and
    to the best of these Officers' knowledge,  the Servicer has fulfilled all of
    its  duties,   responsibilities   or  obligations   under  these  Agreements
    throughout  such  year,  or if there has been a default  or  failure  of the
    servicer to perform any of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a
    description of each default or failure and the nature and status thereof has
    been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
    servicer in good standing;

(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
    Policy  and any  other  bonds  required  under  the  terms of the  Servicing
    Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or
    Seller/Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
    applicable) and Primary  Mortgage  Insurance  Policy (if  applicable),  with
    respect  to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have  been  paid  and  that all such
    insurance policies are in full force and effect;

(E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
    accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on
    any  Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid,  or if any such costs or expenses
    have not been paid with respect to any  Mortgaged  Property,  the reason for
    the non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
    required per section  6050H,  6050J and 6030P of the Internal  Revenue Code,
    respectively, have been prepared and filed.


Certified By:


Officer

Sr.Vice President
Title

4-5-00
Date

7142 COLUMBIA GATEWAY DRIVE
COLUMBIA, MD 21046-2132
410/872-2000 OFFICE
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 20, 2014

No. 04-12-00841-CV

SCHUHARDT CONSULTING PROFIT SHARING PLAN, Allan P. Blosxom, III, Thomas 

O. Stoner, Stormy Night, LLC and TOS Ranch, LLC,

Appellants

v.

DOUBLE KNOBS MOUNTAIN RANCH, Inc and Carlton E. Thompson,

Appellees

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-09-28311-CV

Honorable Mickey R. Pennington, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Lead Counsel is 

GRANTED.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of February, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
GINA BEAMAN, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) No. SD36473 

 ) 

LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC., ) Filed: June 23, 2020 

 ) 

 Respondent. ) 

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

AFFIRMED 

Gina Beaman lost a workers' compensation claim for failure to carry her burden of proof. She appeals,

charging in each of six points that "there was not sufficient competent evidence" to support a decision against her. 

See § 287.495.1(4), RSMo. (2000)1

 

Only factual findings needed to make an award for the employee need evidentiary support. Annayeva v. 

SAB of TSD of City of St. Louis, 597 S.W.3d 196, 200 n.8 (Mo. banc 2020). This tracks a basic precept – no 

evidence is needed to find against the party who bore the burden of proof or to uphold that decision on appeal. See, 

e.g., Taylor v. Taylor, 585 S.W.3d 390, 395 & n.5 (Mo. App. S.D. 2019). 

Offering no cognizable legal basis for reversal, Beaman's § 287.495.1(4) complaints fail without further 

discussion or analysis. See Guinn v. Treasurer, No. SD36380, slip op. at 9 (Mo. App. S.D. May 4, 2020). We 

reject all points and affirm the denial of benefits. 

MARY W. SHEFFIELD, J. – OPINION AUTHOR 

DANIEL E. SCOTT, P.J. – CONCURS 

DON E. BURRELL, J. – CONCURS 

 

1

 Harmonized with the constitutional standard ("supported by competent and substantial evidence[,]" Mo. Const. art. 

V, § 18) in Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222 (Mo. banc 2003).
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of


SinoCoking
Coal and Coke Chemical Industries, Inc. (“Company”):





We
consent to the incorporation in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended June 30, 2010 (“Form 10-K”) and the Registration Statement on Form S-1
filed with the Commission as number 333-166720 (“Registration Statement”) of our
report dated September 28, 2010 on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of SinoCoking Coal and Coke Chemical Industries, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the years ended June 30, 2010
and 2009.


/s/
Frazer Frost LLP
 
 Frazer
Frost LLP


(successor
entity of Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP)


Brea,
California


September
28, 2010