alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Frontier Long/Short
Commodity Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                  
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                                    
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                     
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                         
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund                                                                                                                             
|Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund                                                      

Date: August 11, 2010
1 NOT FOR RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

File Name: 14a0140n.06

No. 13

- 3570

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

JEFFREY MAYLE, MILDRED KOWELL

, )

JAY YOUNG, )

)

Plaintiffs

- Appellants, )

)

v. ) ON APPEAL FROM THE

) UNITED STATES DISTRICT

JERRY L. MALOON, in both his official and ) COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN

individual capacities; DAVID R. HUNT, in both ) DISTRICT OF OHIO

his official and individual capacities; )

LISA SMITH, )

)

Defendants

- Appellees. )

)

)

BEFORE: SUHRHEINRICH, SILER

, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges.

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. Jeffrey Mayle, Mildred Kowell, and the estate of

Jay Young (collectively “ P laintiffs”) appeal the district court’s judgment granting summ ary

judgment for defendants Jerry L. Maloon II, David R. Hunt, and Lisa Smith (collectively

“ D efendants”) and dismissing Plaintiffs ’ 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 civil rights case

.

Plaintiffs cla imed that D efendants violated their rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth

Amendments in obtaining warrants and seizing their property by deliberately including false

statements and omitting material facts in the affidavits used to obtain the warrants. They

requested compensatory and punitive damages, as well as equitable relief.

After reviewing both parties’ motions for summary judgment, the district court g ranted

summary judgment for D efendants. The court decided that, viewed objectively, P laintiffs did not2

show that D efendants stated a deliberate falsehood or showed reckless disregard for the truth ;

that the allegedly false or omitted information was material to the finding of probable cause ; or

that D efendants omitted facts from the affidavit that were critical t o the finding of probable

cause. Further, the court found that defendant Maloon was entitled to qualified immunity

because he did not participate in drafting or reviewing the warrant affidavits.

Plaintiffs raise the following issues on appe al:

Whether the trial court erred in deciding that Franklin County

Municipal Court Judge Anne Taylor’s testimony was irrelevant on the issue of

what evidence was material to probable cause and whether she would have

granted the search warrants if Defendant s had not deliberately omitted

information in affidavits and had not made misrepresentations about other

information.

Whether the trial court erred in holding that the omissions and

misrepresentations were irrelevant on the issue of probable cause and if r elevant

were not material to a finding of probable cause.

Whether the trial court erred in holding that Assistant Attorney

General Maloon is not responsible for any material omissions or

misrepresentations in the affidavits for search warrants.

Having revi ewed the parties briefs, the applicable law, and the record, and having heard

oral arguments, we conclude that the district court appropriately disposed of each of the issue s

Plaintiffs raise before this c ourt. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the dis trict court’s opinion

dated March 29, 2013, we AFFIRM.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0597 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CAVEY LITTLE ROSSBACH,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 1 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 26 2023

07/26/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0597
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. Bornhoft,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the managing owner of The Frontier Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Frontier Fund.



/s/ Richard E. BornhoftRichard E. BornhoftPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier FundAugust 15, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or any other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to The Frontier Fund and will be retained by The Frontier Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Picard *v.*Waggoner.

In Banc.

Nov. 22, 1948.

(37 So. (2d) 567)

*367Albert S. Johnston, Jr. for appellant.

*370T. J. White, for appellee.

*372Griffith, O. J.

The declaration alleges that appellant, the defendant in the trial court, was the owner of a property on Kuhn Street between East Howard Avenue and East Beach Street in Biloxi, and that appellee, the plaintiff was a guest of the defendant, and that said defendant “negligently allowed an open vent to a sewer approximately six inches in diameter to remain open and unprotected among some grass and weeds on her property and the plaintiff ... at or about 9:15 P.M. on the night of August 30, 1945 stepped onto this open vent to the sewer and received painful and lasting damages . . . .”

It will be noted that there was no allegation as to where on the said property the said open vent was located, the theory of the pleader being evidently that this particular fact would be immaterial, — in which we think the pleader was mistaken.  It is, of course; the duty of the keeper of a lodging house where guests are received for hire to use reasonable care to provide the guest with reasonably safe means of ingress and egress, and when sufficient and suitable means have been designated and supplied for this purpose, the keeper is not under duty to any guest to maintain the entire premises in a safe condition but only such other parts as by invitation or customary use to the knowledge of the keeper the guest would be reasonably expected to go. 43 O.J.S., Innkeepers, Sec. 22, page 1180, 28 Am. Jur. p. 579, and cases cited.

And the theory presented by the declaration was definitely followed up by  two instructions granted at plaintiff’s request, which told the jury that it was the duty of the defendant “to maintain her premises in a reasonably safe condition,” there being no effort by said instructions to bring the liability within the rule of law above stated, and there was no other instructure to cure the error. There seems to be no dispute that defendant had furnished a safe means of ingress both at and oppo*373site the front entrance on East Beach Street and at and apposite the side entrance on Kuhn Street, and that the vent complained of was not within or closely upon either of the two entrance ways so furnished; and there is some testimony that it was located some twelve feet northward from the Kuhn Street regular entrance, hut its exact location is not clear, and, as mentioned, the instructions relieved the jury of making any findings as to where it was, so long as anywhere on defendant’s property.

 On a review here we are limited to the case as presented to the jury in the trial court, and we are not permitted to conjecture as to what the result might or could have been had the recovery been sought on some other ground. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Sumrall, 96 Miss. 860, 867, 51 So. 545; Williams v. Lumpkin, 169 Miss. 146, 153, 152 So. 842. It follows that the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

So ordered.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7532

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ABDULLAH RASOOL SHAKOOR, a/k/a Lee McDonald, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-64-BO, CA-00-144-7-BO) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 10, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abdullah Rasool Shakoor, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, John Howarth Bennett, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Abdullah Rasool Shakoor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shakoor , Nos. CR-97-64-BO; CA-00-144-7-BO (E.D.N.C. filed June 26, 2001; entered June 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Eva Muszynski 

703-405-9858 

e.muszynski@umiami.edu 

Good Morning, 

My name is Eva Muszynski and I am here today to tell you how carbon 

pollution has affected my life, and why I support the EPA's Clean Power 

Plan. 

Growing up in Northern Virginia, I spend time each summer sailing on 

the Potomac River just south of city. I have seen the transformation of 

the DC skyline from being able to see the details of the starch white 

capitol buildings from miles away to what I now see every weekend: a 

hazy outline of what I know is the capitol that looks as if it is caught in a 

perpetual shadow of darkness. But the darkness is not a cloud but the 

carbon pollution that looms overhead from the over 100 unregulated 

power plants in the Virginia, 

Although I have seen how carbon pollution can transform a city skyline, 

what has struck me the most, is the visible effects on coral reefs caused 

by global warming I have seen within my lifetime. 

One of my favorite childhood memories was on a family vacation in the 

Florida Keys. We stayed in a small house on the beach with a coral reef 

relatively close to shore. The first few days we were there, it would take 

my dad holding my hand, as I would float with a mask on my face and 

snorkel in mouth, for me to feel comfortable entering the underwater 

world. By the end of the week, I refused to leave the water for hours, 

fascinated with the vibrant fish that darted to and fro, colorful coral 

feeding on particles of nutrients floating by, and the occasional 

barracuda that would stare me down. My love for the ocean flourished 

on this trip at the age of 8 and has only been magnified since. 

I am now at the University of Miami studying Marine Science and 

Biology and have the pleasure Scuba diving practically every weekend. 

After returning to the same coral reef this past semester I was 

devastated to find that what had been healthy coral is now bleached, 

dying coral disserted from the plethora of life previously there. 
fIigher sea temperatlares frorn global wai -ming liave caused major coral 

bleaching events orn reefs 1 have been visiting for years. Some coral are 

able to recover, but too cften the coi'al dies, and the entire ecosystezn for 

whiclz it forms the base, virtually disappears. 

From the fish that we catch on these reefs that provide the lively hoods 

for manv coastal commtinities, to the plankton that prov.ides 75% of the 

oxygen on earth, we need these reefs to sustain life and our economy, 

and cannot afford to loose them to global warming. 

My future children will never get to see the reefs that have already 

disappear in my lifetime, but I urge all of our leaders to support the 

clean power plan and these first ever limits carbon pollution so that 

future generations have a chance to see how incredible the undersea 

world is, before global warming causes them all to disappear. 

Thank you.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-4513

___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Bryon Welton,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________

 Submitted: July 21, 2017

Filed: July 27, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Federal prisoner Byron Welton appeals the district court’s order committing 1

him under 18 U.S.C. § 4245 for hospitalization and mental health treatment. During

the pendency of this appeal, however, the district court granted the government’s

motion to dismiss the commitment petition and to transfer Welton, citing a report that

Welton had recovered and was ready for discharge. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal as moot. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. 

______________________________

The Honorable Douglas Harpool, United States DistrictJudge for the Western 1

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable

David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-
<SEQUENCE>5
<FILENAME>ims2006ceo906ex32-1.txt
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
                         Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350

                                   ----------

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of INTERNATIONAL MONETARY
SYSTEMS, LTS. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
(the "Report"), I, Donald F Mardak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Donald F Mardak
-----------------------------
Donald F Mardak
Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2007
---

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements pertaining to The 2006 Amended and Restated Stock Option
Plan (Form S-8, No. 333-133552, May 18, 2007), to the Amended 1999 Stock Option
Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-114904, April 27, 2004), and to the Registration
Statement (Form SB-2, No. 333-143060, September 20, 2007) under the Securities
Act of 1933 of Destiny Media Technologies Inc. of our report dated November 26,
2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Destiny Media
Technologies Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended
August 31, 2008.

|                   | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|------------------ | ---------------------
|                   |                      
|Vancouver, Canada, |                      
|November 26, 2008  | Chartered Accountants

---
Table 1. OPP Restricted Use Pesticides Included and Not Included 

on the ECPRA List of Extremely Hazardous Substances. 

Restricted Use Pesticides 

Acrolein 

Acrylonitile 

Aldicarb 

Ally1 Alcohol 

Aluminum Phosphide 

Arsenic Pentoxide 

A vitrol 

Azinphos-metbyl 

Carbofwan 

Chlorfenvinphos 

mordane 

Chlorophacinone 

Cournaphos 

Cycloheximide 

Demeton 

Dicrotophos 

Dioxathion 

Diphacinone 

Disulfoton 

Endrin 

EPN 

Ethion 

Ethoprop 

Fenamiphos 

Fenitrothion 

Fensulfothion 

nuroacetamide 

on EPCRA 302 List 

Fonofos 

Hydrozyanic Acid 

Lindane 

Meihidathion 

Methimarb 

Methomyl 

Metbyl Bromide 

Methyl Isothiocyanate 

Mevinphos 

Monocrotophos 

Nicotine 

Oxarnyl 

Paraquat 

Parathion 

Parathion-methy 1 

Pentachiorophenol 

Phorate 

Phosacetim 

Pbosphamidon 

Sodium cyanide 

Sodium fiuroacetate 

Strychnine 

Sulfotepp 

Sulfuric Acid 

TEPP 

Terbufos 

Toxaphene 

Restricted Use Pesticides 

Acetarnide 

Acetic Acid 

Acetochlor 

A l achlor 

Alpha-Chlorohydrin 

Arnitraz 

Amitrole 

Arsenic Acid 

Akazine 

Avermectin 

Bendiocarb 

Benzoic Acid 

Bis(tributy1tin) oxide 

Biphenthrin 

Brodifacoum 

Butylate 

Cadium Chloride 

Calcium Cyanide 

Carbon Dioxide 

Carbon Tetrachlmide 

Chlordane, technical 

Chlordimeform 

Chlombenzilate 

Chloropicrin 

Chlorotbalonil 

Chlorothoxyfos 

Chlorpyrifos 

Chromic Acid 

Clofentezine 

Coal Tar 

Coal Tar Creosote 

Copper Oxychloride 

bsote 

Creosote Oil 

Cupric Oxide 

Cuprous Oxide 

C y anazine 

Cyfluthrin 

C yhalothrin 

Cypermethrin 

DBCP 

Deltamethrin 

Diailate 

Diazinon 

Dichloenil 

Dichloropmpene 

Diclofop-methyl 

Diflubenzuron 

Dodemorph 

Bmevinphos 

EPTC 

Ethylene Dibromide 

Ethylene Dichloride 

Fenbutatin-oxide 

Fenpropathrin 

Not on EPCRA 302 List 

Fenthion 

Fenvalerate 

Fipmd 

Flucythrinate 

Fludinate 

Hydrogen Cyanamide 

Imazaquia 

Isamfos 

Isofenphos 

Lam&-cyhalothrin 

Magnesium Phosphide 

Methamidophos 

Metolachlor 

Niclosamide 

Nimgen, liquid 

Oxydemton-methyl 

Pentachlorophenol, durn 

Permewin 

Phosalone 

Phostebupiram 

Picloram 

Picloram, isoctyl ester 

Picloram, potassium salt 

Picloram, triisopropanolmi 

Piperonyl butoxide 

Potassium pentachlorophenate 

Profenophos 

Pronamide 

Propanoic acid 

Fropetamphos 

Pyrethrins 

Res Wn 

Rotenone 

S- fenvalerate 

Simazjne 

Wum arsenate 

Sodium dichromate 

Sodium hydroxide 

Sodium methyldithiocarbamatc 

Sodium pyroarmte 

Starlicide 

Sulfuryl Fluoride 

Sulprofos 

Tefluthrin 

TergitoI 

TFM 

Tralomethrin 

Tributyltin flouride 

Tribuiyltin methacrylate 

Trifluralin 

Triisopropranolamine 

Triphenyltin hydroxide 

Zinc pllosphide 

Z-rnevinphos
**Exhibit 21.1**

Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. 

Subsidiaries 

(State of incorporation) 

Beasley Mezzanine Holdings, LLC (DE) 

Beasley FM Acquisition Corp. (DE) 

KDWN License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WAEC License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WAZZ License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WCHZ License, LLC (DE) 

WDAS License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WFLB License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WGOR License, LLC (DE) 

WIKS License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WJBX License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WKIS License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WKML License Limited Partnership (NC) 

WMGV License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WNCT License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WPOW License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WRXK License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WSFL License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WTMR License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WWDB License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WWNN License, LLC (DE) 

WXNR License Limited Partnership (DE) 

WXTU License Limited Partnership (DE) 

Beasley AP Holdings, LLC (DE) 

Beasley-Reed Acquisition Partnership (DE) 

WQAM License Limited Partnership (DE) 

Beasley BA Holdings, LLC (DE) 

Beasley Broadcasting of Nevada, LLC (NC) 

KJUL License, LLC (NC) 

Beasley Broadcastingof Southwest Florida, Inc. (DE) 

WXKB License Limited Partnership (DE) 

Beasley Radio, Inc. (DE) 

WJPT LicenseLimited Partnership (DE) 

Beasley Internet Ventures, LLC (DE) 

Beasley Internet Ventures II, LLC (DE)
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Case number: 01

- 13

- 00648

- CV

Style: In re Honorable Christopher Dupuy , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

from State of Texas ex rel. Hughes v. Dupuy

, cause number 13

- CV

- 0701, pending in the 10th District court of Galveston County, Texas, the Honorable Robert J. Kern presiding

.

R elator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion

to stay a show cause and contempt hearing scheduled for July 30, 2013 at 10:30

A.M. Relator’s emergency motion is granted

. The July 30, 2013 show cause and contempt hearing is stayed. T he stay is effective until this mandamus proceeding is finally decided.

The Court further requests th at real party in interest respond to the petition.

In its response, real party in interest is requested to include full briefing on (1) the

trial court’ s jurisdiction over the underlying civil removal suit, (2) real party in interest’s authority to bring a nd prosecute the underlying civil removal suit, and (3) the propriety of the order prohibiting media contact.

The response, if any, is due on Monday , August 1 2 , 2013

. Rule 9.2(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the “mailbox rule,” is suspended for the filing of the response, if any, in this case; the response must be received in the

clerk’s office or filed in accordance with this C ourt’s rules on e lectronic f iling no

later than Monday , August 1 2 , 2013

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2, 9.2(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting for the Court

Date: July 29, 2013