alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

I, Min Sok Randy Park, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and allreports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto ReceivablesTrust 2010-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.

 

Date: March 28, 2012

 

 

By:  /s/MIN SOK RANDY PARK                  

Name: Min Sok Randy Park

Title: President and Secretary

(senior officer in charge of securitizationof the depositor)
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with this amended Quarterly Report of Travel Hunt Holdings, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Nancy Reynolds, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




1.  Such
      amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April
      30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
      the period ending April 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Travel Hunt
      Holdings, Inc.




Dated:
      May 11, 2007





**TRAVEL
      HUNT HOLDINGS, INC.**




By: */s/
      Nancy Reynolds*


Nancy
      Reynolds


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Office
Exhibit 35.1

[Citi logo]

1123  Servicer Compliance
Statement

Transactions Listed With SEC

I, Anthony Renzi, Senior Vice President of CitiMortgage, Inc., certify that:

(a) A review of CitiMortgage, Inc. (the Servicer) activities during the 12 month period ending December 31, 2014 (Reporting
Period) and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement as identified on Schedule A has been made under my supervision.

(b) To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period except as identified on Schedule B.



| |  |                   |  |                                          
| |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
| |  | February 26, 2015
| |  |                  
| |  | By:               |  | /s/ Anthony Renzi                        
| |  | Name:             |  | Anthony Renzi                            
| |  | Title:            |  | Senior Vice President, CitiMortgage, Inc.
| |  |                   |  | Senior Officer in Charge of Servicing    

[No Schedule B to this 1123 Servicer Compliance Statement was provided and the Depositor has been advised by CitiMortgage,
Inc. that the reason no Schedule B was provided is that for purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB CitiMortgage, Inc. fulfilled all of its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period and they
had no exceptions to report.]



---

Schedule A

Transactions Listed with SEC 2014



|                     |  |                                             |  |                                                                             
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Investor/Bond Number |  | Security or Deal                            |  | Party the Servicer Is Reporting To (Master Servicer or Trustee or 
Investor)
|77056                |  | REDWOOD TRUST-WL 44                         |  | WELLS FARGO BANK - TRUSTEE                                                  
|                    |  | SEQUOIA MORTGAGE TRUST 2013-8 (SEMT 2013-8) |  | CITIMORTGAGE, INC. MASTER SERVICING                                         
|77099                |  | CMLTI 2014-A                                |  | CITIBANK AGENCY AND TRUST                                                   
|77101                |  | NEW RESI. MORTG. LOAN TRUST 2014-1          |  | NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, MASTER SERV.
**Rule 1915.4 -**  **1. Al**  **ternative Hearing Procedures for Partial Custody A** **ctions.** *** * *** (c) The president judge or the administrative judge of the family division of each county shall certify that custody proceedings generally are conducted in accordance with either Rule 1915.4
- 2 or Rule 1915.4
- 3. The certification shall be filed with the Domest ic Relations Procedural Rules Committee of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania and shall be substantially in the following form: I hereby certify that ___________________ County conducts its custody proceedings in accordance with Rule ____________________.

________________________________________________________ (President Judge) (Administrative Judge) Note : Pursuant to Rule 1915.4
- 1, the following counties have certified to the Domestic Relations Procedural Rules Committee that their custody proce edings generally are conducted in accordance with the rule specified below: COUNTY RULE *** * *** Northumberland **[ 1915.4**  **- 3**  **] 1915.4**  **- 2**  *** * ***
#### GREGORY DILL, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. BUDD CONSTRUCTION CORP., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Messrs. Liebowitz, Krafte & Liebowitz*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Vaccaro & Osborne*for the respondent.

May 16, 1967.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ajay Bansal, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tercica, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tercica, Inc.

Date: November 3, 2006



By:

/s/ Ajay BansalAjay BansalChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Tercica, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form
10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 49756.

#### Protests 953541-G, etc., of W. A. Taylor & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision the protests were sustained to this extent.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TE XAS

N O

. W R

- 8 5

, 3 4 3

- 0 1

E X P A R T E N A I M M U H A M M A D

, A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R P O S T

- C O N V I C T I O N W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S

I N C A U S E N O

. F

- 1 1

- 0 0 6 9 8 I N T H E C R I M I N A L D I S T R I C T C O U R T N O

. 4

D A L L A S C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m

.

O R D E R

I n M a y 2 0 1 3

, a j u r y f

o u n d a p p l i c a n t g u i l t y o f t h e o f f e n s e o f c a p i t a l m u r d e r

. S e e

T E X

. P E N A L C O D E § 1 9

. 0 3 ( a )

. B a s e d o n t h e j u r y ’ s a n s w e r s t o t h e s t a t u t o r y p u n i s h m e n t

q u e s t i o n s

, t h e t r i a l c o u r t s e n t e n c e d h i m t o d e a t h

. O n F e b r u a r y 3

, 2 0 1 5

, t h e S t a t e f i l e d i n 1

t h i s C o u r t i t s b r i e f o n a p p l i c a n t ’ s d i r e c t a p p e a l

. P u r s u a n t t o A r t i c l e 1 1

. 0 7 1 § § 4 ( a ) a n d

See Art. 37.071. Unless other wise indicate d all ref

ere nces to Ar

ticles ref er to the Code 1

of Criminal Procedur e.Muhammad - 2

( b )

, a p p l i c a n t ’ s i n i t i a l a p p l i c a t i o n f o r a w r i t o f h a b e a s c o r p u s w a s d u e t o b e f i l e d i n t h e 2

t r i a l c o u r t o n o r b e f

o r e J u n e 1 8

, 2 0 1 5

, a s s u m i n g a m o t i o n f o r a n e x t e n s i o n w a s t i m e l y

f i l e d a n d g r a n t e d

.

I t h a s b e e n m o r e t h a n a y e a r a n d a h a l f s i n c e t h e a p p l i c a t i o n w a s d u e i n t h e t r i a l

c o u r t

. A c c o r d i n g l y

, w e o r d e r t h e t r i a l c o u r t t o r e s o l v e a n y r e m a i n i n g i s s u e s i n t h e c a s e

w i t h i n 1 8 0 d a y s f

r o m t h e d a t e o f t h i s o r d e r

. T h e c l e r k s h a l l t h e n i m m e d i a t e l y t r a n s m i t t h e

c o m p l e t e w r i t r e c o r d t o t h i s C o u r t

. A n y e x t e n s i o n s o f t i m e s h a l l b e r e q u e s t e d b y t h e t r i a l

j u d g e

, o r o n h i s o r h e r b e h a l f

, a n d o b t a i n e d f

r o m t h i s C o u r t

.

I T I S S O O R D E R E D T H I S T H E 2 9 D A Y O F M A R C H

, 2 0 1 7

. T H

D o N o t P u b l i s h

U n l e s s o t h e r w i s e i n d i c a t e d a l l r e f e r e n c e s t o A r t i c l e s r e f

e r t o t h e C o d e o f 2

C r i m i n a l P r o c e d u r e

.
June 8, 1956

Reap. Dec. 8596.

#### Nicholas *Gal (Globe Shipping Co., Inc.)*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y. Reap. Dec. 8573. Motion by plaintiff.
**Exhibit 12.1** **Mediacom    Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries** **Schedule    of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**                        **For the Years Ended December 31,**   **2007**  **2006**  **2005**  **2004**  **2003**   **(In thousands, except ratio amounts)**      Earnings:                        (Loss) income before income taxes     $    (95,129    )     $    (65,188    )     $    (24,965    )     $    13,628      $    (62,051    )    Interest expense, net      239,015       227,206       208,265       192,740       190,199     Amortization of capitalized interest      3,069       2,678       2,357       2,055       2,083     Amortization of debt issuance costs      4,884       5,998       8,613       8,725       6,696     Interest component of rent    expense(1)      5,787       5,755       5,267       4,931       4,583                          Earnings available for fixed charges     $    157,626      $    176,449      $    199,537      $    222,079      $    141,510     Fixed Charges:                        Interest expense, net     $    239,015       227,206      $    208,265      $    192,740      $    190,199     Capitalized interest      3,818       3,603       3,756       3,012       6,957     Amortization of debt issuance costs      4,884       5,998       8,613       8,725       6,696     Interest component of rent expense(1)      5,787       5,755       5,267       4,931       4,583                          Total fixed charges     $    253,504      $    242,562      $    225,901      $    209,408      $    208,435     Ratio of earnings to fixed charges      —       —       —       1.06       —     Deficiency of earnings over fixed charges     $    (95,878    )     $    (66,112    )     $    (26,364    )     $    —      $    (66,925    )      (1)     A reasonable approximation (one-third) is deemed to be the    interest factor included in rental expense.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-19-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          18,815                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,815                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              400                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         5,122                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,527                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,815                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,602                  13,527
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,602)                (13,527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,602)                (13,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,602)                (13,527)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
#### Elias Auble, *Respondent, v.*Jonathan Auble, *Appellant.*

— Order modified so as to include costs of motion for new trial, and, as modified, affirmed without costs of appeal. Opinion by Boardman, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration 

                    By Notice dated January 16, 2007, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 23, 2007, (72 FR 2907), the listing of controlled substances Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370), was incorrectly listed as a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II, for Organix Inc., 240 Salem Street, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801. The Notice of Application should be corrected to a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule I.                 

Dated: March 8, 2007. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. 

 [FR Doc. E7-5385 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
No. 49272.

#### Protests 80515-K, etc., of Sprouse-Reitz Co., Inc., et al. (San Francisco and Seattle).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### John T. McGrath, *Respondent, v.*Charles T. Cromwell, *Appellant, Impleaded,*etc.

Interlocutory judgment upon order overruling defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
19–008 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 1st Session 108–57 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1559, EMERGENCY WARTIME SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 

2003

APRIL 2, 2003.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 172]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 172, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1559, the 

Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003, under 

an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate equally 

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. The rule further waives points of order against provisions in 

the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting 

unauthorized appropriations or legislative provisions in a general 

appropriations bill). The rule provides that the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The rule authorizes the Chair to accord priority in recognition to Members who 

have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record. 

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

in the rule includes a waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring 

a three-day layover of the committee report), which is necessary because the report was not filed until Wednesday, April 2, 2003, and 

the bill may be considered as early as Thursday, April 3, 2003. 

2

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each 

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with 

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 44

Date: April 2, 2003. 

Measure: H.R. 1559—Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003. 

Motion by: Mr. Frost. 

Summary of motion: To make in order the amendment offered by 

Representative Rodriguez and grant the appropriate waivers for 

the amendment which adds $70 million for Veterans Administration health care preparedness. It also adds $20 million for first 

year implementation of four previously authorized Veterans Administration bio-terrorism centers. 

Results: Defeated 3 to 7. 

Vote by Members: Goss—Nay; Linder—Nay; Diaz-Balart—Nay; 

Hastings (WA)—Nay; Sessions—Nay; Reynolds—Nay; Frost—Yea; 

McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)—Yea; Dreier—Nay.

Æ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-79,901-02

EX PARTE KEITH REYNOLDS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 20090D02381 IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1

FROM EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of

manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance and one count of possession of marijuana, and was

sentenced to seventeen years’ imprisonment for the manufacture or delivery count and three years’

imprisonment for the possession of marijuana count, to run concurrently. 

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal because he was erroneouslyadvised

that he had no right of appeal after entering into an agreement at the sentencing stage of trial. 

Applicant alleges that upon further investigation it was discovered that he did not knowingly and
2

voluntarily waive his right to appeal from the jury’s verdict.

The trial court has determined that Applicant was denied his right to appeal this conviction,

and that he desire to pursue an appeal. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file

an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 20090D02381 from the Criminal

District Court No. 1 of El Paso County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may

give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful

appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall

be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court

issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps

to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court

issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: October 8, 2014

Do not publish