alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of JohnsonDiversey Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended April 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Edward F. Lonergan                              
|                   |  |  |  | Edward F. Lonergan,                                 
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                   |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | /s/ Joseph F. Smorada                               
|                   |  |  |  | Joseph F. Smorada,                                  
|                   |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 53095.

#### Scruggs-Vandervoort-Barney, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 50953-K (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on entry 1313. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 10.3

EXECUTION COPY

DEED OF TERMINATION OF THE RECEIVABLES OFFER DEED

July 15, 2009

Reference is made to the
Receivables Offer Deed dated as of October 24, 2003 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified prior to the date hereof, the ROD), between JohnsonDiversey UK Limited, a limited liability company incorporated under the
laws of England and Wales (JD-UK) and JWPR Corporation (JWPR). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the ROD.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the ROD, the parties listed on the signature page hereto agree that the ROD is terminated effective as of the
date hereof and the parties shall have no further obligations to each other thereunder. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this deed or any other Transaction Document, the obligations of JWPR and JD-UK under the ROD that expressly survive
termination of the ROD shall continue after the termination of the ROD.

This deed and any non-contractual obligations arising out of it
shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of England and Wales.

This deed may be executed in any number of
counterparts and all such taken together will be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

IN WITNESS OF WHICHthis document has been duly executed as a deed by the parties and delivered on the date
inserted above.



|                                      |  |   |  |                    
|------------------------------------- |  | - |  | -------------------
|EXECUTED and DELIVERED as a DEED by   |  | ) |  |                    
|JOHNSONDIVERSEY UK LIMITED            |  | ) |  | /s/ David C. Quast.
|acting by David C. Quast, a director, |  | ) |  | Director           
|in the presence of:                   |  | ) |  |                    

Signature of witness: /s/ Tony A Sebranek

Name (in BLOCK CAPITALS): TONY A. SEBRANEK

Address: 8310 16THSTREET, STURTEVANT, WISCONSIN, U.S.A.

Occupation: TREASURY MANAGER



|                                       |  |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | -
|EXECUTED and DELIVERED as a DEED       |  | )
|by JWPR CORPORATION                    |  | )
|by Tony A Sebranek                     |  | )
|being a person who, in accordance with |  | )
|the laws of that territory, is acting  |  | )
|under the authority of the company     |  | )

/s/ Tony A Sebranek Authorised signatory



Signature Page to

Deed of Termination of ROD

JD-UK



---

Acknowledged and agreed to as of

the date first above written:

THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA,

as Agent, as a Managing Agent, and as a

Financial Institution under the Purchase

Agreement defined in the ROD



|    |  |                   |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------- |  | 
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Darren Ward  
|    |  | Name: Darren Ward
|    |  | Title: Director  



Signature Page to

Deed of Termination of ROD

JD-UK
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14268-14269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-48-000]


Entergy Services, Inc.; Notice for Petition of Declaratory Order

March 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 15, 2007, Entergy Services, Inc. on 
behalf of Entergy Operating Companies filed a petition for declaratory 
order, pursuant to section 207 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulation, 18 CFR 385.207.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

[[Page 14269]]

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a4c4f584945646663646f597f7a7a65787e4a6c6f7869246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1a7a4b3a2ae8f8d888f84b29491918e9395a187849382cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 16, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5519 Filed 3-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lamont Racks, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 501]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County *665(Martin, J.), rendered February 7, 1994, as amended February 9, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 71⁄2 to 15 years for his convictions of robbery in the second degree, a concurrent term of imprisonment of 3 to 6 years for his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and a consecutive term of imprisonment of 21⁄2 to 5 years for his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is modified, on the law, to the extent that all of the sentences shall run concurrently with each other; as so modified, the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was denied his right to be present at the proceeding at which he was found competent to stand trial. The defendant had no right to be present since there was no hearing and no significant factual inquiry *(see, People v Williams,*85 NY2d 945, 947).

The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is also without merit. The record demonstrates that the defendant was afforded meaningful representation *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137).

We find, however, that the imposition of a consecutive sentence for the defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was improper pursuant to Penal Law § 70.25 (2). The record reveals that both of the defendant’s convictions of criminal possession of a weapon were part of a single, continuous act *(see, People v Sessoms,*200 AD2d 850; *People v Bolus,*185 AD2d 1007; *People v Riley-James,*168 AD2d 740). O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 57 (Monday, March 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5462]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

March 21, 2007.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before April 25, 
2007 to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0768.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: EE-178-78 Final (TD 7898) Employers Qualified Educational 
Assistance Programs.
    Description: Respondents include employers who maintain education 
assistance programs for their employees. Information verifies that 
programs are qualified and that employees may exclude educational 
assistance from their gross incomes.
    Respondents: Businesses and other for-profit insitutions.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 615 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-2033.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Notice 2006-83, Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases.
    Description: The IRS needs bankruptcy estates and individual 
chapter 11 debtors to allocate post-petition income and tax withholding 
between the estate and the debtor. The IRS will use the information in 
administering the internal revenue laws. Respondents will be individual 
debtors and their bankruptcy estates for chapter 11 cases filed after 
October 16, 2005.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,500 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-0949.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Application for Special Enrollment Examination.
    Form: 2587.
    Description: This information relates to the determination of the 
eligibility of individuals seeking enrollment status to practice before 
the Internal Revenue Service.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 11,000 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Glenn P. Kirkland (202) 622-3428, Internal 
Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-5462 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Before the Second Division,

April 3, 1952

No. 56529.

protests 818632-G, etc. (Seattle).

#### The American Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of so-called “artificial gut or artificial tegusu,” in chief value of silk, the same in all material respects as the merchandise the classification of which w^s involved in *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Mary D. Casey, Also Known as Doris Casey, Deceased. William F. Hyland et al., *529Appellants-Respondents; Margaret P. Looby et al., Respondents-Appellants.

[634 NYS2d 396]

—Appeal by William F. Hyland and Patrick J. Scinto, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Emmanuelli, S.), dated October 13, 1993, and cross appeal by Margaret Patricia Looby and Suzanne Casey Bove from stated portions of the same decree.

Ordered that the decree is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated in the decision of Surrogate Emannuelli dated June 9, 1993. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 (BAUMANN, RAYMONDO & COMPANY PA LOGO) Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549 Re:
    
    Global Energy Group, Inc.
Form 10-KSB
 Gentlemen: As independent auditors, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated April 22, 2005
and to all references to our firm included in or made as part of Global Energy Group, Inc. 2004
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Very truly yours, -s- Baumann, Raymondo & Company PA Baumann, Raymondo & Company PA
Tampa, Florida
May 9, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II,

Petitioner, No. CIV-S-04-2245 LKK KJM P 

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas

corpus under28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Examination of the affidavit reveals petitioner is unable to afford the costs of this action. 

Accordingly, leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

Petitioner appears to challenge a guilty finding at an administrative disciplinary

proceeding. Petitioner has submitted his habeas petition on the standard form provided by this

court. However, petitioner has not provided enough detail or filled out the form accurately if in

fact it is the disciplinary proceeding that forms the basis of his filing. For example, the court

cannot tell whether petitioner has exhausted state court remedies with respect to his claim, which

petitioner must do before pursuing any habeas claim in this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1);

Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 276 (1971). The information that should be provided in the

Case 2:04-cv-02245-LKK -KJM Document 4 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

form-habeas application should relate only to the administrative proceeding at issue, not

petitioner’s criminal conviction. Further, petitioner has not provided enough facts to state a

claim for the violation of a Constitutional right. For example, petitioner claims there was

insufficient evidence to support the disciplinary proceeding finding, but fails to indicate what

evidence was presented at the proceeding. To the extent petitioner asserts violations of state law,

he is informed that under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a), a writ of habeas corpus can only issue for

violations of federal law.

Good cause appearing, petitioner will be granted thirty days within which to file

an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. If petitioner fails to file an amended petition

within thirty days, this case will be closed.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; 

2. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with leave to

amend within thirty days from the date of this order;

3. Any amended petition must bear the case number assigned to this action and

the title “Amended Petition”; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the court's form for

application for writ of habeas corpus. 

DATED: May 13, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

wood2245.114

Case 2:04-cv-02245-LKK -KJM Document 4 Filed 05/16/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32(a)**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-KSB of CommerceFirstBancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006, I, Richard J. Morgan,President and Chief Executive Officer of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc., herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such, fairly presentssuch Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of CommerceFirstBancorp, Inc.
|  /s/ Richard J. Morgan           |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard J. Morgan                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Case No. 14,526.

#### UNITED STATES v. BARNHARDT.

[20 Int. Rev. Rec. 137.]

District Court. N. D. Ohio.

1874.

Internal Revenue — Liquor—Sale without License — Intent to Defraud.

On motion for a new trial, held, that a single sale of spirituous liquor makes a retail dealer therein under the law; (2) that where license or payment of tax is relied upon in defence, it must be shown by the defendant, and the government is not bound to show want of license or payment; (3) that intent to defraud the government need not be proven to convict. A new trial is therefore refused.

Geo. Willey, U. S. Atty.

S. E. Adams and C. M. Safford, for defendant.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 105 (Monday, June 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31326-31327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12616]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

[Public Notice: 2014-3004]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, 
and Approvals

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: EIB 92-27 Report of Overdue Accounts Under Short-Term 
Policies.
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The collection provides Ex-Im Bank 
staff with the information necessary to monitor the borrower's payments 
for exported goods covered under its short and medium-term export 
credit insurance policies. It also alerts Ex-Im Bank staff of defaults, 
so they can manage the portfolio in an informed manner.
    Form can be viewed at http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/eib92-27.pdf.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 2, 2014 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV (EIB 92-27) or by mail to Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20038 Attn: OMB 
3048-0027.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title and Form Number: EIB 92-27 Report of Overdue Accounts Under 
Short-Term Policies.
    OMB Number: 3048-0027.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The collection provides Ex-Im Bank staff with the 
information necessary to monitor the borrower's payments for exported 
goods covered under its short- and medium-term export credit insurance 
policies. It also alerts Ex-Im Bank staff of defaults, so they can 
manage the portfolio in an informed manner.

[[Page 31327]]

    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 745.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours for Respondents: 186.25 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Monthly, until completed.
    Government Reviewing Time per Year: 186.25 hours.
    Average Wages per Hour: $42.50.
    Average Cost per Year: $7,915.63.
    Benefits and Overhead: 20%.
    Total Government Cost: $9,498.75.

Bonita Jones-McNeil,
Records Management Division, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-12616 Filed 5-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```