alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| The Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas: |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Servicing criterion 1122(d)(1)(iii) is applicable only with respect to the Company’s continuing obligation to act as, or locate a, successor servicer under the circumstances referred to in certain transaction agreements.  It is management's interpretation that the Company has no other active back-up servicing responsibilities in regards to 1122(d)(1)(iii) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011.  Furthermore, Management’s Assertion of Compliance indicates that there were no activities performed related to this criterion during the year ended December 31, 2011 with respect to the Platform, because there were no occurrences of events that would require the Company to perform such activities. |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(iii) is applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform only as it relates to the Company’s obligation to report additions, removals or substitutions on reports to investors in accordance with the transaction agreements.  Furthermore, Management’s Assertion of Compliance indicates that there were no activities performed related to this criterion during the year ended December 31, 2011 with respect to the Platform, because there were no occurrences of events that would require the Company to perform such activities. |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| - 22 -  |
|--------------|
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8520 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to require the Secretary of Health 

and Human Services, acting through the Director of the Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention, to implement the Climate Ready Tribes 

Initiative. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Ms. UNDERWOOD (for herself, Mr. HUFFMAN, and Mr. CARBAJAL) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to require the 

Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through 

the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, to implement the Climate Ready Tribes Initiative. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Climate Health 

5 Assurance Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8520 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLIMATE READY TRIBES INITIATIVE. 

2 Part B of title III of the Public Health Service Act 

3 is amended by inserting after section 317V (42 U.S.C. 

4 247b–24) the following new section: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 317W. CLIMATE READY TRIBES INITIATIVE. 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, acting through 

7 the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Pre8 vention, in coordination with the National Indian Health 

9 Board, shall implement the Climate Ready Tribes Initia10 tive for the following purposes: 

11 ‘‘(1) Translating climate change science to in12 form Tribal governments, health departments, and 

13 communities. 

14 ‘‘(2) Creating decision-support tools to build ca15 pacity to prepare for climate change. 

16 ‘‘(3) Serving as a credible leader in planning 

17 and preparing for the public health impacts of cli18 mate change. 

19 ‘‘(4) Identifying, assessing, and taking action to 

20 mitigate climate-related health threats. 

21 ‘‘(5) Sharing relevant materials and resources, 

22 including information about funding and other op23 portunities. 

24 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8520 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—To carry out this section, 

2 there is authorized to be appropriated $110,000,000 

3 for fiscal year 2025 and each fiscal year thereafter. 

4 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—None of the funds made 

5 available under paragraph (1) may be transferred or 

6 reprogrammed by the Secretary to carry out another 

7 program administered by the Secretary.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(File No. 333-82124) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-41360, 333-68306, 333-122787 and 333-129008) ofMediacom Communications Corporation of our report dated March 15, 2006 relating to the financialstatements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP
Index of CBI Pre-Rule Communication with Companies

1.) CBI Placeholder: Oct. 6, 2010 – Correspondence from Don Magid, Solvay Fluorides, LLC, 

to Drusilla Hufford, EPA

2.) CBI Placeholder: Dec. 15, 2010 – Correspondence from William J. Hamel, Arkema Inc., to 

Drusilla Hufford, EPA

3.) CBI Placeholder: April 15, 2011 – Correspondence from William J. Hamel, Arkema Inc., to 

Drusilla Hufford, EPA

4.) CBI Placeholder: December 14, 2011 – Handout received from Hudson Technologies 

during meeting with EPA
IB 

Union Calendar No. 535 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8658 

[Report No. 118–638] 

To require a report by the Transportation Security Administration on digital 

identity ecosystems, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2024 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security 

AUGUST 30, 2024 

Additional sponsor: Mr. FOSTER

AUGUST 30, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8658 RH

A BILL 

To require a report by the Transportation Security Administration on digital identity ecosystems, and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 8658 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emerging Digital Iden5 tity Ecosystem Report Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TSA REPORT ON DIGITAL IDENTITY ECOSYSTEMS. 

7 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact8 ment of this Act, the Administrator of the Transportation 

9 Security Administration shall submit to the Committee on 

10 Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and 

11 the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

12 Affairs of the Senate a report describing the current state 

13 of digital identity ecosystems and the homeland security 

14 value of emerging digital identity ecosystems in the trans15 portation sector, including related benefits and risks, and 

16 how such current and emerging ecosystems may better 

17 protect homeland security and increase the competitive ad18 vantage of the United States. Such report shall, to the 

19 maximum extent practicable, include perspectives from the 

20 private sector and State, local, Tribal, and territorial gov21 ernments relating thereto. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 535 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8658 

[Report No. 118–638] 

A BILL 

To require a report by the Transportation Security 

and for other purposes. Administration on digital identity ecosystems, 

AUGUST 30, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8292 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase penalties for 

unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Mr. SMITH of Missouri (for himself, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. 

WENSTRUP, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. ESTES, Mr. 

SMUCKER, Mr. HERN, Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. 

KUSTOFF, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. STEUBE, Ms. TENNEY, Mrs. 

FISCHBACH, Mr. MOORE of Utah, Mrs. STEEL, Ms. VAN DUYNE, Mr. 

FEENSTRA, Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, and Mr. CAREY) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

penalties for unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Data Protec5 tion Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8292 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED DIS2 CLOSURES OF TAXPAYER INFORMATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and 

4 (5) of section 7213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

5 1986 are each amended by striking ‘‘$5,000, or imprison6 ment of not more than 5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘$250,000, 

7 or imprisonment of not more than 10 years’’. 

8 (b) DISCLOSURES AFFECTING MULTIPLE TAX9 PAYERS TREATED AS MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS.—Section 

10 7213(a) of such Code is amended by adding at the end 

11 the following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(6) DISCLOSURES AFFECTING MULTIPLE TAX13 PAYERS TREATED AS MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS.—For 

14 purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5), 

15 any violation of any such paragraph which affects 

16 more than 1 taxpayer shall be treated as a separate 

17 violation with respect to each such taxpayer.’’. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this subsection shall apply to disclosures made after the 

20 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Catherine Kane, *Respondent, v.*Carlos Cortesy, *Appellant.*

— Judgment reversed, new trial granted referee discharged, costs tc abide event. Opinion by Bockes, J.
#### The People *ex rel.*George E. Carrigan, *v.*The Board of Police of the City of Yonkers.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed February 10, 1890.)*

Municipal cobfobations—Police—Removal.

Relator being sick, requested his physician to report his illness to the police authorities, which was done, but not until after roll-call. The police surgeon was notified of the nature of his illness, and the treatment pursued. *Held,*that such absence from roll-call did not constitute the offense of absence without leave, and that the charge of misleading the police surgeon was not sustained, as, after such notice from his physician, relator was under no obligation to give further information.

Certiorari to review proceedings of respondents removing relator on charges of being absent from roll-call without leave, and of seeking to deceive and mislead the police surgeon in relation to his illness.

*John F.*Brennan, for relator ; *J. P.*Sanders, for resp’ts.

Pratt, J

The testimony of the police surgeon proved relator’s illness to be real and serious. It was a valid ground for his absence from duty, and he requested his physician to make a report of his illness to the police authorities, which report was in fact made, although-not till half an hour after roll-call. Such an absence from roll-call does not constitute the offense of “ absence without leave,” for which he could legally be removed from offica Nor was the charge of misleading the police surgeon established. He requested his physician to inform the police surgeon of his illness, which was in fact done. The surgeon was not misled. He was not only notified of the illness, but of its nature and the treatment pursued. After such notice from relator’s physician, there was no reason why relator should give any further information on the subject.

The evidence does not establish that the illness was the result of misconduct. Other possible causes were given by the police surgeon. There is no presumption in favor of crime, and the legal presumption is the other way.

It follows that relator’s discharge from the police force was unauthorized, and the proceedings must be reversed.

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J., concur.
MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 3-22-11 Meeting with Industry Coalition and EPA on the 2011 NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

On June 21, 2011, EPA met with various members of an industry coalition (including the forest 

product industries) to discuss their issues and concerns with the rulemakings on “Identification 

of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) That are Solid Waste,” (76 FR 15456 and 76 

FR 80452). 

During that meeting, industry members expressed concerns with the NHSM Rulemaking. EPA 

asked clarifying questions regarding the information presented, particularly for resinated wood, 

TDF, Wastewater Treatment Residuals, Paper recycling residuals/OCC rejects, Processed C&D, 

and Non-hazardous treated wood. 

Agenda

The Industry Coalition’s agenda is attached. 

Meeting Attendees

Members from Industry: 

Sarah Amick (RMA), 

Susan Bodine, 

Corey Brandt (RockTenn), 

Mike Curtis (GP) 

Tim Hunt (AF&PA/AWC) 

Gary Melow (BPA) 

Paul Noe, (AF&PA) 

Tracey Norberg (RMA) 

Jeff Shumaker (IP) 

Bill Turley (CRMA) 

Vipin Varma (NCASI) 
Steve Woock (Weyerhaeuser) 

EPA Invitees: 

Suzanne Rudzinski 

Jim Berlow 

Mimi Guernica 

Staff: 

Alan Carpien 

Kenneth Dixon 

George Faison 

Mike Svizzero 

Tab Tesnau 

Marc Thomas 
Industry Coalition meeting with EPA on NHSM 

March 22 from 1 to 2:30 

Logistics:

o Location: ORCR, Two Potomac Yard (North Building); 2733 Crystal Drive; 

Arlington/Crystal City, VA; Room 6100

o Attending: Tim Hunt (AF&PA/AWC), Paul Noe (AF&PA), Jeff Shumaker (IP), 

Mike Curtis (GP), Corey Brandt (RockTenn), Steve Woock (Weyerhaeuser), Rob 

Kaufmann (Koch), Vipin Varma (NCASI), Susan Bodine, Tracey Norberg (RMA), 

Sarah Amick (RMA), Bill Turley (CRMA), Gary Melow (BPA) 

Draft Agenda 

Introductions 

Legal issues (5 minutes)

Program Structure (35 minutes) 

• Contained gas 

• Contaminant comparisons 

• Definitions 

• Petition process 

• Homogeneous material 

• Comfort letters 

Non-waste fuel listing (45 minutes) 

• Resinated wood 

• TDF 

• Wastewater Treatment Residuals 

• Paper recycling residuals/OCC rejects 

• Processed C&D 

• Non-hazardous treated wood 

• Other materials 

Wrap Up (5 minutes): 

• Summarize key outstanding questions 

• Other issues – rule schedule
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Dudley Mendenhall, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Websense, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof Websense as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. Websense’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for Websense and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Websense, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Websense’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this annual report any change in Websense’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringWebsense’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Websense’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. Websense’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, toWebsense’s auditors and the audit committee of Websense’s board of directors: 

(a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Websense’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Websense’sinternal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: February 27, 2009
#### The Diamond Match Company, Respondent, *v.*William Roeber, *Appellant.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
#### John Reed *Respondent, v.*George McConnell, Appellant.

Appeal sent to Second Department.

Bockes, J., not acting.
No. 58626.

protests 162159-K, etc. (New York).

#### Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper coverings containing phonograph records the subject of *United States*v. *Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division*(41 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 541), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coast Financial Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Brian P.
Peters, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
         report.

Date: December 31, 2003            By: /s/ Brain P. Peters
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Brian P. Peters, Executive Vice
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 49261.

#### Protest 836067-G of Psaki Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that some of the cheese in question is similar to the Pecorino Romano cheese the subject of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284) and that other items consist of cheese similar to the Sbrinz cheese the subject of Abstract 42146. The records in these cases were incorporated herein. The protest was therefore sustained as to these items.
Faulk, Scott (OST)

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:

Greetings All: Faulk, Scott (OST) Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:34 PM 'Young, Janet'; 'Wegley, Michael'; 'Bramble, John' Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) Requesting Community Comments re: EAS at Merced, CA Boutique Air Revised Proposal.pdf; Great Lakes revised proposai-Merced.pdf; SeaPort.pdf; Makani Kai at Merced.pdf; Mokulele.pdf

Iwould like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Merced, as well as give you an opportunityto offer any comments forthe formal record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretaryfor Aviation and International Affairs. On March 27, 2015, one ofthe aircarriers that submitted a proposal to serve Merced for a newterm requested a modification to its proposal. The Departmentfound it to be in the public's interest to grant the modificationrequest, and in orderto continueto provide a fair carrier selection process, the Department offered all carriers that originallyproposed service at Merced, in response to Order2014-5-9, an opportunityto amend theirproposal. Amended proposals were due by April 6, 2015. Boutique Air, Great Lakes Aviation, and SeaPort amended theirproposals; Makani Kai and Mokulele did not amend theirproposals. All five proposals for consideration are attached to this email and Iexpect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime this afternoon. Irequest that you reviewthe proposals and submit any comments you mayhave as soon as possible, but no laterthan May 8. 2015. Please send your comments directly to me via e-mail at scott.faulk@dot.gov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list.

Ifyou have any questions, feel free to contactme. Regards, Scott Faulk U.S. Department ofTransportation EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 1200 NewJerseyAve., SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-9967

1