alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 64974.

#### Walter Hatches, Inc., and W. J. Byrnes *&*Co. of N.Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/7814, 60/8263, and 60/9086 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Mottahedeh Creations, Ltd., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 9, C.D. 2095), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hines Real Estate Investment
Trust, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2006
    
    /s/ Charles M. BaughnCharles M. BaughnChief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RockwoodSpecialties Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Zatta, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2006                            |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/ ROBERT J. ZATTA                                |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                                    |
| Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven Vestergaard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Destiny Media Technologies, Inc. for the
year ended August 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Destiny Media Technologies, Inc. (the Company)

| | By:    | /s/Steve Vestergaard   
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | STEVEN VESTERGAARD     
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | December 1, 2008       

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-KSB. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 10934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 
 
 To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
 SinoCoking Coal and Coke Chemical Industries, Inc. (“Company”):
 
 
 The undersigned consents to the incorporation in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of the Company and subsidiaries, which were filed with the Commission as numbers 333-117979, 333-114906, 333-32740, 333-106102, 333-106101, 333-106005, 333-87800 and 333-32740, and on Form S-3, which were filed with the Commission as numbers 333-112504 and 333-109844,  of its Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Report dated March 25, 2010 covering the consolidated financial statements of the Company and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 
 
 
 MEYERS NORRIS PENNY LLP
 
 
 
 
 Vancouver, Canada
 March 30, 2010
Filed February 10, 1890.

#### Sarah B. Gammond, Resp’t, *v.*The Bowery Savings Bank, App’lt.

Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals.

Motion granted.
|  |
|--|
|  |
|  |
|   |   |  |
|--------|--------|--|
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 24, 2009

0217 

# Order

February 24, 2009

137767

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137767 COA: 287946 Berrien CC: 2007-404692-FH DWIGHT DEMONT HALLIBURTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 46825.

#### Protest 67823-K of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of clothes brushes similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Heinrich Herrmann & Weiss*(26 C. C. P. A. 292, C. A. D. 30) the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 1506 was sustained.
December 7, 1960

No. 64961.

#### Organon, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/1123(A), 59/1124(A), and 59/1124(B),

Abstract 64652. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interchange Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Heath B. Clarke, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
Interchange Corporation, and Douglas S. Norman, Chief Financial Officer of
Interchange Corporation, certify, to their knowledge that:  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Interchange Corporation. Date: November 19, 2004
    
    /s/ Heath B. ClarkeHeath B. ClarkeChief Executive Officer and Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Douglas S. NormanDouglas S. NormanChief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interchange Corporation and will be retained by Interchange
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### LOUIS F. RAYMOND, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES S. CREGAR, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-PETITIONERS.

See same case below: 72 *N. J. Super.*73.

*Mr. George Duggan*and *Mr. Thomas L. Parsonnet*for the plaintiff-petitioner-respondent.

*Messrs. Biher, Danzig, Marsh & Scherer*and *Mr. Louis Ogust*for the defendants-respondents-petitioners.

April 30, 1962.
Before the Second Division,

August 1, 1939

No. 41878.

#### Protest 82818-G of Salem Shawiry (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The claim as embroidered articles at 75 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1430, Tariff Act of 1922, was sustained.
Order entered October 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00913-CR

EDWON KUMONT JULIAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-45796-V

ORDER

The reporter’s record has been filed in this appeal, but the clerk’s record has not been 

filed. Appellant’s notice of appeal reflects that the trial court appointed counsel to represent 

appellant.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s 

record within TWENTY-ONE DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
FTC Consumer Alert

Federal Trade Commission ! Bureau of Consumer Protection ! Office of Consumer and Business Education

Student Surveys:

Ask Yourself Some Questions

It’s not unusual for school administrators to be asked permission to distribute surveys to their students.

Federal law enforcement officials say that among the factors to weigh when you’re deciding whether to use class

time to collect information from students is knowing how the information will be used.

Information about students is a valuable asset. It can help educational institutions reach students who might

be interested in their programs, and it can be used by commercial businesses to target an audience who might

like their products and services.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently reached settlements with two companies that distribute

surveys to students through their schools. According to the FTC, the companies claimed that they would use the

student information for educational purposes only, such as college recruitment. The FTC contends that the

companies also used the information for commercial marketing purposes. The companies have agreed to make

clear disclosures if they plan to use student information for noneducational marketing purposes.

If an organization asks you to distribute a survey to your students, the FTC recommends that you check to

see if the survey form includes a privacy statement. If there is no privacy statement, you may want to think

twice about distributing the survey. In any case, it is wise to know:

• who is collecting the information;

• how the information will be used;

• with whom the information will be shared; and

• whether students will have a choice about the use of their information.

The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) is a federal law that affords certain rights to parents of

minor students with regard to surveys that ask questions of a personal nature, as well as to surveys designed to

collect personal information from students for marketing purposes. Briefly, with regard to marketing surveys,

PPRA generally requires schools to develop policies, notify parents about these surveys and permit them to opt

their children out of participation in those surveys. Surveys that are exclusively used for certain educational

purposes are excepted from these requirements. For more information about the PPRA, visit the Department of

Education’s website at www.ed.gov/offices/OM/fpco.

The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive and unfair business practices in the

marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop and avoid them. To file a complaint or to

get free information on consumer issues, visit www.ftc.gov or call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-

4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft and other fraud-related

complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to hundreds of civil and criminal law

enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.

F C EDERAL RADE OMMISSION T FTC OR HE ONSUMER

1-877-FTC-HELP www.ftc.gov

January 2003
#### C. G. Evans, a single man, v. Burdette E. Simmons.

177 So. 282.

Division A.

Opinion Filed October 28, 1937.

Rehearing Denied December 14, 1937.

*Hugh C. Nicholas,*for Appellant;

*Morrow & Mayes,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam:

The appeal in this case is from a final decree confirming the report of the Master and holding and decreeing that a certain deed described in the decree is in effect a mortgage given to secure the payment of debts owing by the grantor to the grantee, decreeing the amount of the balance of the indebtedness due and requiring the defendant to reconvey to the plaintiff the legal title to the land described upon thb payment of the amount required in and by the decree and to thereupon deliver full possession of the said land to the plaintiff, decreeing that if the amount found to be due and required to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant within the time fixed by the decree, is not so paid by the plaintiff the cause should be dismissed out of court without prejudice, and decreeing that the court costs of the cause and the costs incident to the taking down and transcribing of the proceedings -before the Master should be taxed equally against the plaintiff and the defendant.

*712There is one assignment of error, which is, that the court erred in entering the final decree.

The appellant presents ten questions for our consideration but they all may be resolved into one question and that is whether or not there is sufficient substantial evidence in the record to sustain the decree of the Chancellor. This question must be answered in the affirmative.

We have examined the whole record (see Section 2918 R. G. S., 4637 C. G. L.) and find no reversible error reflected therein.

Therefore, the decree should be and is affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, j. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
EXHIBIT 13.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of Mirae Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Hyung Yun Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: June 28, 2004


/s/ Hyung Yun Lee
---------------------------
Hyung Yun Lee
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mirae Corporation, and will be retained by Mirae Corporation and
furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 or the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted
to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 23, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00436

- CV

IN RE Thomas TERAN and Ruiz and Sons, Inc.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On October 12, 2021, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On December 18, 2021, the real party in interest filed a response, and on January 6, 2022, relators filed a reply in support of their petition. In accordance with our memorandum opinion o f this date, we

CONDITIONALLY GRANT the writ of mandamus. The trial court is directed to vacate the September 14, 2021 Order on Nonparty Foundation Surgical Hospital of San Antonio’s Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash. The writ will issue only if the trial court fails to comply within fifteen days of the date of our opinion and order. This order is without prejudice to the trial court’s authority to craft an order that adequately protects the interests at stake.

This court’s March 4, 2022 ord er granting relators’ “Motion for Emergency Temporary Stay of Depositions Beginning March 8, 2022 and Trial Set April 8, 2022” is DISSOLVED.

It is so ORDERED on March 23, 2022

.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of March, 2022

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020

- CI

- 02455 , styled Victor Galvan v. Thomas Teran and Ruiz and Sons,

Inc. , pending in the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Laura Salinas presiding.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4(U)

NUMBER                                                                   SHARES

                           [CERTIFICATE OF DELAWARE]

                         BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION

       4% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share


This Certifies that____________________________________________________________
is the owner of ________________________________Shares of the Capital Stock of

                         BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof. the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed this_____________day of______________A.D. ______




______________________________                   ______________________________
Douglas J. Wallis, Secretary                     Roger B. Goldstein, President