alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5000 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5000

To prohibit the use of amounts from the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund 
   to implement a certain record of decision, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 2024

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of amounts from the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund 
   to implement a certain record of decision, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF USE OF AMOUNTS FROM THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER 
              BASIN FUND FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES.

    (a) Prohibition.--No amounts from the Upper Colorado River Basin 
Fund established by section 5(a) of the Act of April 11, 1956 (commonly 
known as the ``Colorado River Storage Project Act'') (70 Stat. 107, 
chapter 203; 43 U.S.C. 620d(a)), shall be used to implement the record 
of decision entitled the ``Record of Decision for the Glen Canyon Dam 
Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Final Environmental Impact 
Statement'' and dated December 2016, as supplemented by the record of 
decision entitled ``Supplement to the 2016 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term 
Experimental and Management Plan Record of Decision'' and dated July 
2024, to address the threat of nonnative fish in the Colorado River 
below Glen Canyon Dam.
    (b) Treatment of Funds.--Any Federal funds made available for the 
purpose described in subsection (a) shall be nonreimbursable and 
nonreturnable to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
<Page>



EXHIBIT 10.15

                          AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE

      This agreement is to amend certain provisions of that certain $86,902
Promissory Note dated May 9, 2001 (the "Note") from Brian Derr ("Executive") and
payable to Apropos Technology, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Company").
Terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to
such terms as set forth in the Note.

      The references to April 1, 2002 in the Note are hereby replaced with April
1, 2003.

      The references to January 2, 2004 in the Note are hereby replaced with
January 2, 2005.

      Agreed and accepted to this 25th day of March, 2002.

/s/ Brian Derr                            Apropos Technology, Inc.
--------------
Executive
                                          By: /s/  Francis J. Leonard
                                              -----------------------
                                          Its:  Chief Financial Officer
                                          Title:
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v LAWRENCE E. LUMM, Airman First Class, U. S. Air Force, Appellant

No. 29,917

May 23, 1975

*Colonel William E. Cordingly*and *Captain Bruce R. Houston*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel C. F. Bennett*was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

In proceedings before a general court-martial composed of members, the appellant was convicted of negligent homicide as well as the possession, use and transfer of heroin in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§892 and 934. He was sentenced by the court to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 18 months, forfeiture of $250 per month for 18 months, and reduction to pay grade E-l. The convening authority reduced the forfeitures to $200 per month for 18 months in otherwise approving the sentence as adjudged. Following summary affirmance by the United States Air Force Court of Military Review, the appellant petitioned this Court pursuant to Article 67(b)(3), UCMJ, 10 USC § 867(b)(3).

From our examination of the record, we note that the military judge, during the sentencing portion of the trial, failed to instruct the court that when voting on proposed sentences, it should begin with the lightest proposal and continue in this manner until a sentence was adopted by a concurrence of two-thirds of the members. This failure constitutes reversible error requiring a rehearing on the sentence. *United States v Johnson,*18 USCMA 436, 40 CMR 148 (1969).1

The decision of the United States Air Force Court of Military Review affirming the sentence is accordingly reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force. A rehearing on sentence may be ordered.

Chief Judge Fletcher did not participate in the decision of this case.

1

*See also*United States v Wright, 20 USCMA 12, 42 CMR 204 (1970); United States v Pryor, 19 USCMA 279, 41 CMR 279 (1970).
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Campus Crest Communities, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officers
of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |                            |                                                                    
|------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 24, 2014 |  | By: | /s/ Ted W. Rollins        
|                    |  |     |                            | Name: Ted W. Rollins
        Title: Chief Executive Officer        
|                    |  |     |                           
|                    |  | By: | /s/ Donald L. Bobbitt, Jr.
|                    |  |     |                            | Name: Donald L. Bobbitt, Jr.
        Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### The Continental Insurance Co., Resp’t, *v.*The Phenix Insurance Co., App’lt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,*

*Filed January 24, 1890.)*

Reference—Compulsory.

A compulsory reference should not be ordered where it appears that the examination of the account is only collateral to the main issue.

Appeal from order of reference.

*J. A.*Shoudy, for app’lt; *Barney &*Wells, for resp’t.

Per Curiam.

We think the order of reference granted in this case should be reversed upon the authority of *Camp*v. *Ingersoll,*86 N. Y., 433.

It is quite apparent that whatever examination of accounts is to be made, it is of one collateral to the main issue presented by the pleadings.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Van Brunt, P. J., Brady and Daniels, JJ., concur.
#### Louis Bajus, App’lt, *v.*Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., Resp’t.

IK. R. *Goodelle,*for app’lt; *Louis Marshall,*for resp’t.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur, except Rugbr, Ch. J., not sitting, and Andrews, J., not voting.

Affirming 3 N. Y. State Rep., 96.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

R.C. THOMAS a/k/a ROBERT THOMAS , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 1 8

- 3545

[ January 31, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.85 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 92

- 17415

- CF

- 10A and 98

- 6260

- CF

- 10A

.
R.C. Thomas, Lake City

, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

D AMOORGIAN , C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 58118.

protests 185757-K, etc. (Seattle).

#### Acrow, Incorporated, and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of building shores the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 57727, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 10.20


 





WL Ross Sponsor LLC


c/o WL Ross & Co. LLC


1166 Avenue of the Americas


New York, NY 10036


 


March 26, 2015


WL Ross Holding Corp.


c/o WL Ross & Co. LLC


1166 Avenue of the Americas


New York, NY 10036


 


              Re:
Waiver under Administrative Services Agreement


 


Gentlemen:


 


We refer to the Administrative Services Agreement
by and between us and the Company dated June 5, 2014 (the “Agreement”).


 


We hereby irrevocably and unconditionally
waive the $10,000 per month payment obligations (the “Administrative Fee”) of WL Ross Holding Corp. (the “Company”)
that is payable to our affiliate, WL Ross & Co. LLC, for the period beginning on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31,
2015 (the “Waiver Period”) under the Agreement. Following the Waiver Period, the Company shall continue to be
obligated to pay the Administrative Fee under the Agreement to WL Ross & Co. LLC.


 


Other than the foregoing waiver expressed
in this letter, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


 


[Signature page follows]


 




    	1



    	 



    

 


 


	Very truly yours,


 


	
        WL ROSS SPONSOR LLC

        By: WL ROSS GROUP, L.P., its Managing Member

        By: El Vedado, LLC, its General Partner
	 
	 	 
	
        /s/ Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.

         
	 
	    Name: Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.	 
	    Title: Manager	 


 


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


	 	WL ROSS HOLDING CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. 
	 	 	Name: Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.
	 	 	
        Title: Chairman and

        Chief Executive Officer



 






    	2
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00328

- CR

______ _____________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 4

Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1796798
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. M emorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth 

### C HRISTIAN 

### J. S CHROEDER 

### , Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINIO N
Aft er Appellant Christian J. Schroeder fi led a motion to set bond, the trial
entered an o rder denying him bond

. Proceeding pro se, App ella nt now a ttempts to appeal that order. But an interlocutory order ruling on a mot ion to set bond is not appealable. See Ragston v. State , 424 S.W. 3d 49, 5 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) ; Conley v.
State , No s . 02

- 21

- 00090

- CR, 02

- 21

- 00091

- CR, 02

- 21

- 00093

- CR , 2 021 WL 3793816, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Aug. 26, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op ., not designated for publication)

. Because t here is no record o f a n appeal able or der or judgment, and b ecause such an order or judgment is necessary for this court to o btain ju ris diction, s ee Conley , 2021 WL 3793816, at *1 , w e notified Appellant of our conce rn that we lacked jurisdiction over his appeal

. We w arned that we would dismi ss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless , within ten days, Appellant or any other part y sho wed grounds for continuing it

. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2 (f), 44. 3

. Appella nt responded by filing with
the trial court a document entitled “ DEMAND TO AC KNOWLEDGE VALID
APPEAL , ” which the trial court filed with us. T h is document catalogues Appellant ’ s

nume rou s complai nts , but it d oes not show ground s for th is court to exercise jurisdiction over his appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for wan t of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P

. 43 .2(f) ; se e Ragston , 424 S.W.3d at 5 0

– 5 2 ( affirming di s missal of appeal for want of3

jurisdic tion in similar c ase ) ; Conley , 2021 WL 3793816, at *1 ( dismissing appeal s for want of jurisdiction in s imilar case )

. /s/ Bonnie Sudderth
Bonnie Sudderth Chief Justice
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered : January 18, 2024
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00301-CR

Jonathan Guia, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. CR-17-0025-C, THE HONORABLE DWIGHT E. PESCHEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Jonathan Guia has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion is 

signed by both appellant and his attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). We grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal. See id.

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: June 10, 2022

Do Not Publish
Manufacturers - Low NOx Burners

Company Contact Email Phone

Metso Kenneth Gardner kenneth.gardner@metso.com 570.271.7637

Outokumpu Jan Weckes Jan.Weckes@outokumpu.com

Danieli Peter Zonneveld Peter.Zonneveld@danieli-corus.com +39 (0432) 597821

Danieli Koen Meijer Koen.Meijer@danieli-corus.com +31(6513) 93458

John Zink Jason McAdams Jason.McAdams@johnzink.com 918.234.2728
Manufacturers - SCR

Company Contact Email Phone

Schreiber, Yonley, and Assoc Bob Schreiber

Babcock Power Bob Harold BHarold@babcockpower.com 508-854-3941 

Cormetech Elizabeth Govey GoveyEM@Carmetech.com 919.620.3000
Manufacturers - IFGR/ULNB

Company Contact Email Phone

John Zink Jason McAdams Jason.McAdams@johnzink.com 918.234.2728

Metso Kenneth Gardner kenneth.gardner@metso.com 570.271.7637
Manufacturers - Wet Scrubber

Company Contact Email Phone

STS Consultants Hal Taylor taylor@stsconsultants.com (847) 279-2541
Manufacturers - Wet ESP

Company Contact Email Phone

Durr Rodney Pennington Rodeny.Pennington@durrusa.com 407.822.9203
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Frontier Fund.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                            
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                              
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                               
|Brent Bales                                                                                                   
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund              

Date: May 14, 2008
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Ivision Group Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger Boileau, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  November 6, 2006

By:  /s/ Roger Boileau

Name:  Roger Boileau

Title:    Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 5810 Dir ID: 2014

- NM

- 116

- AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 6/3/14

Regional Airline Association 6/3/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 6/3/14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 6/3/14
Drone Surveys and Reports sUAS Landowner Permission Form v01 Page	____________________
#### Geo. L. Whitman *et al.*v. John R. Haines *et al.*Benj. Knower *et al.*v. The Same. Francis M. Bacon *et al.*v. The Same. Julius Ballin *et al.*v. The Same. Henry A. Gowing *et al.*v. The Same.

*Sidney H. Stuart,*for app’lt; *Henry Stanton,*for resp’ts.

*992Orders affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

All concur.

Affirming 21 N. Y. State Rep., 41.
No. 50553.

#### Protests 81463-K, etc., of Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd., et al. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nippon Co.*(32 C. C. P. A. 164, C. A. D. 303), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith certain items of the merchandise were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1705 as kelp and other items were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1540 as seaweeds, manufactured.
No. 48588.

#### Protest 967818-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Exhibit 1 received in evidence consists of brightly colored miniature soldier figures about 2% inches tall. They were admittedly composed in chief value of wood. At the trial the plaintiff produced one witness, the proprietor of the ultimate consignee, but his testimony was found not strong enough to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification of the collector. It was also found that the articles in size, form, and coloring are not uDlike the small lead soldiers commonly used by children as toys. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
#### Maria Kelly, *Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v.*Consumers’ Gas Company, *Respondent.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
#### Randall G. Cowenhoven, *Appellant, v.*George W. Ball, *Respondent.*

— Judgment affirmed because of non-service of papers according to stipulation.
#### Michael Cummins, Respondent, *v.*The City of Syracuse, *Appel*lant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Maoomber, J.
<PAGE>

                              AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                              [LICENSE] AGREEMENT

     This Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (this "Amendment") is made and
entered into as of January 1, 2000, by and between Jon D. Darmstadter
("Licensor") and The Children's Beverage Group, a Delaware corporation
("Licensee").

                                   RECITALS

     A.   Licensor and Licensee entered into that certain Agreement dated
September 14, 1999 (the "Contract").

     B.   Pursuant to Section 3 of the Contract, Licensor is entitled to certain
payments to be determined.

     C.   The parties desire to modify the provisions of the Contract as set
forth herein.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the mutual
promises contained herein, Stockholders and Trustee agree as follows:

     1.   Amendment to Section 3 of the Contract.  Section 3 of the Contract is
hereby amended by deleting subsections A. and B. and substituting therefor the
following:

          "A.  License Payment.  For the license granted in Paragraph 2. of this
Agreement, the Licensee shall pay Licensor an annual fee equal to $1.00."

     In addition, subsection 3.C. shall be renumbered and become subsection 3.B.

     2.   Effectiveness of Contract.  Except as expressly provided herein,
nothing in this Amendment shall be deemed to waive or modify any of the
provisions of the Contract, or any amendment or addendum thereto. In the event
of any conflict between the Contract, this Amendment or any other amendment or
addendum thereof, the document later in time shall prevail.

     3.   Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date first above written.

                                        By:  /s/ Jon Darmstater
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             JON D. DARMSTADTER


                                        THE CHILDREN'S BEVERAGE GROUP, INC.



                                        By:  /s/ Edward R. Ferry
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Edward R. Ferry, Authorized Officer