alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00364-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF R.J.G., A CHILD 

 

On Appeal from the 64th District Court 

Hale County, Texas 

Trial Court No. A36136-0807, Honorable Robert W. Kinkaid Jr., Presiding 

 

November 14, 2014 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant James L. Gunter filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s June 27, 

2014 modification order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. Gunter’s motion 

for new trial was overruled. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure 

to comply with a directive of this court.

Gunter’s notice of appeal was filed October 10.1 In a written request filed on 

October 20, the district clerk sought additional time to file the clerk’s record because 

Gunter had not paid or made arrangements to pay for preparation of the clerk’s record. 

 

1

The notice of appeal was filed within 15 days of the deadline. We granted 

Gunter’s motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.
2

By letter of October 21, we ordered Gunter to make acceptable payment arrangements 

by November 5, and advised him that failure to comply would subject the appeal to 

dismissal for want of prosecution without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

We further directed the district clerk to file a status report if Gunter failed to make 

payment arrangements as directed. The district clerk has filed a status report indicating 

that she mailed the bill of costs to counsel for Gunter on October 23, 2014, and stating 

that Gunter nonetheless has not paid or made payment arrangements for preparation of 

the clerk’s record.2

Because no clerk’s record was filed in this appeal due to the fault of Gunter after 

receiving a reasonable opportunity to cure his failure to make payment arrangements, 

we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with a directive 

of the court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c), 42.3(b),(c).

Per Curiam

 

 

2 Gunter has not paid the filing fee for this appeal nor has he offered proof of 

indigence. He has not responded to an October 21 letter from this court’s clerk notifying 

him of the defect, and affording ten days for correction.
#### H. G. White Co. *v.*United States

No. 7497.

Entry No. 315/1/2.

-Invoices dated Birmingham, England, March 31, 1941, etc.

Certified April 24, 1941, etc.

Entered at San Francisco, Calif., July 11, 1941.

(Decided January 7, 1948)

*Harper & Harper {George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the foliow'ing stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. .

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8736 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8736

   To require the President to notify Congress of each instance the 
 President takes certain drugs relating to cognitive function, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2024

  Mr. Ogles introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the President to notify Congress of each instance the 
 President takes certain drugs relating to cognitive function, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Juicing Joe Act''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the President shall 
notify the House of Representatives and the Senate not later than five 
days after each instance the President ingests or otherwise takes a 
dose of any stimulant (not including caffeine or nicotine) or any 
anabolic steroid, narcotic, or other drug known to heighten or impair 
alertness, judgement, or mood.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41701 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LUIS VILLALOBOS-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-724-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Luis Villalobos-Reyes (“Villalobos-Reyes”) appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation. Villalobos-Reyes argues that the sentencing provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) & (b)(2) are unconstitutional based on Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). He also argues that a F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11 guilty plea colloquy should not be statutorily or constitutionally delegated to a non-Article III magistrate judge. Villalobos-Reyes concedesNo. 02-41701 -2- that his arguments are foreclosed , but he nevertheless seeks to preserve them for Supreme Court review
. Villalobos-Reyes’ contention that the enhancement provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) & (b)(2) are unconstitutional lacks merit because Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 24 (1998). See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Villalobos-Reyes’ contention that a magistrate judge should not be statutorily or constitutionally delegated to conduct a
F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11 plea colloquy is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Dees , 125 F.3d 261, 264-68 (5th Cir. 1997). For the foregoing reasons, Villalobos-Reyes’ sentence is
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8675 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8675

 To require the Transportation Security Administration conduct a study 
  relating to the digitization of the law enforcement officer flying 
   armed checkpoint data collection process, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2024

 Mr. Garbarino (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Transportation Security Administration conduct a study 
  relating to the digitization of the law enforcement officer flying 
   armed checkpoint data collection process, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Repair of the National Law 
Enforcement Telecommunications System Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. STUDY RELATING TO DIGITIZATION OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 
              FLYING ARMED CHECKPOINT DATA COLLECTION PROCESS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Transportation Security 
Administration, acting through the Director of the Federal Air Marshal 
Service, shall conduct a study on the digital data collection process 
for law enforcement officers who are flying armed.
    (b) Elements.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
examine the following:
            (1) Projected timelines for the digital data collection 
        process referred to in such subsection.
            (2) Estimated resources required to implement such process.
    (c) Briefing; Accessibility.--Upon completion of the study required 
under subsection (a), the Administrator of the Transportation Security 
Administration shall--
            (1) provide to the Committee on Homeland Security of the 
        House of Representatives and the Committee on Science, 
        Commerce, and Transportation and the Committee on Homeland 
        Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a briefing on 
        the findings of such study; and
            (2) make such study accessible in a digital format suitable 
        for use by the Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Medley
Capital Corporation, (the “Company”) for the annual period ended September 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Brook Taube and Richard T. Allorto, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: December 8, 2014



| | By | /s/ Brook Taube            
| | -- | ---------------------------
| |    | Brook Taube                
| |    | Chief Executive Officer    
| |    |                            
| | By | /s/ Richard T. Allorto, Jr.
| |    | Richard T. Allorto, Jr.    
| |    | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ajay Bansal, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tercica, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tercica, Inc.

Date: August 5, 2008



By:

/s/ Ajay BansalAjay BansalChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Tercica, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form
10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 61957.

#### Brimberg Bros. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 742424-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or *Prime Fur Corp.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, *supra,*the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8537 

To require a study on public health impacts as a consequence of the February 

3, 2023, train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Mr. JOYCE of Ohio (for himself and Ms. KAPTUR) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require a study on public health impacts as a consequence 

of the February 3, 2023, train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘East Palestine Health 

5 Impact Monitoring Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY ON PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACTS AS A CON7 SEQUENCE OF THE TRAIN DERAILMENT IN 

8 EAST PALESTINE, OHIO. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

10 Human Services (referred to in this section as the ‘‘SecVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:41 Jul 10, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8537.IH H8537

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8537 IH

1 retary’’) shall award a grant, contract, or cooperative 

2 agreement to an eligible entity for purposes of conducting 

3 a longitudinal study on any human health effects as a con4 sequence of the February 3, 2023, train derailment in 

5 East Palestine, Ohio, and subsequent venting and burning 

6 of chemicals. 

7 (b) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—To be eligible for the award 

8 under subsection (a), an entity shall be a consortium of 

9 public or private institutions of higher education that dem10 onstrates requisite capacity and expertise to carry out the 

11 study described in such subsection. The Secretary shall 

12 give additional consideration to eligible entities that have 

13 established relationships within the affected communities. 

14 (c) REPORTS.—The Secretary shall submit to the 

15 Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of 

16 the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

17 of the House of Representatives— 

18 (1) not later than 2 years after the date on 

19 which an award is made pursuant to subsection (a), 

20 a report summarizing the progress of such study, in21 cluding a description of any challenges related to 

22 conducting such study and an anticipated timeline 

23 for completion of such study and publication of re24 sults; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8537 IH

1 (2) not later than 1 year after publication of 

2 such results, a report describing such results and 

3 any ongoing or planned activities of the Secretary to 

4 support or conduct further research and, as appro5 priate, otherwise address such results. 

6 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

7 authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be nec8 essary for fiscal year 2025, to remain available until Sep9 tember 30, 2029, to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 12
- 00483
- CR HAROLD ALEXANDER JAC KSON , Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 87th District Court Freestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 11
- 067
- CR

ABATEMENT ORDER
The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due on February 12, 2013.
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.2(a). In a letter dated March 22, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified the court reporter, Helen C. Wooten, that the reporter’s record had not been filed. Wooten did not respond to this letter. Thus, the Clerk of this Court sent Wooten a
second le tter dated April 26, 2013, notifying Wooten that the reporter’s record had not been filed and requesting a response within ten days. On April 29, 2013, Wooten responded by requesting a thirty

- day extension to file the reporter’s record in this case.Jackson v. State Page 2

Ther eafter, we ordered Wooten to file the reporter’s record within thirty

- five days of May 9, 2013. We also notified Wooten that a failure to file the reporter’s record within thirty

- five days of May 9, 2013 would result in the case being abated to the trial court for a hearing to determine a date certain when the reporter’s record could be completed and filed. To date, the reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. It is the joint responsibility of this Court and the trial court to ensure that the
ap pellate record is timely filed. Id. at R. 35.3(c). Further, this Court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely filing of the appellate record. Id. Accordingly, we abate this appeal and order the trial court to conduct a hearing within twenty

- one days of the date of this abatement order to determine a date certain by when the reporter’s record can be filed in a manner that does not further delay the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of depriving appellant of his right of appeal. The court reporter is ordered to file a supplemental reporter’s record with this Court containing the transcription of the hearing within seven days of the hearing. Further, the district clerk shall file a supplemental clerk’s record with this Cou rt containing the trial court’s findings and order within seven days of the hearing.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal a bated Order issued and filed July 25, 2013 Do n ot p ublish
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOC KHAR T a nd NINA R INGGOLD, Plaintiffs - Appe lla nts, v. M YER J. SANKAR

Y; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 11-57247 D.C . No. 2:09-c v-09215-R -R C M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia M anue l L. R e a l , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

April 9, 2015 * * Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : REINHAR

DT, M c KEOW

N, a nd M . SM ITH, C i rc uit Judge s. The Appe lla

nts, Nina R inggold a

nd Justin R

i nggold-Loc k

ha rt, a ppe a l from the d istric t c o urt’ s orde r de ny ing the ir m otion for re lie f from judgm e nt. W e have jurisdic tion pursua

nt to 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a

nd we a ffirm
. 

# F IL ED APR 28 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).W e m a y only re v ie w a distric t c ourt’ s ruling on a R ule 60(b) m otion for a buse o f disc re tion. Brow de r v . Dir., De p’t of C orr. of Ill. , 434 U.S. 257, 263 n.7 (1978). The Appe lla

nts sought re lie f from

the fina l orde r on the ba sis of ne wly disc ove re d e vide nc e , nam e ly a M ay 23, 2011 le tte r of the C a lifornia C om m i ssion on Judic ia l Pe rform an c e . The le tte r wa s not re le va nt to thedistric t c ourt’ s c onc lusion tha

t the a c tion wa s ba

rre d unde r the Rook

e r-Fe l dman doc trine . It wa s the re fore not a

n a buse of disc re tion to c onc lude tha t the disc ove ry

of the le tte r did not wa rrant re lie f from judgm e nt. The distric t c ourt did not err by not gra nting theAppe lla

nts le ave to a

m e nd the i r c o m pla int. Am e ndm e nt

would ha v e be e n futile in this c a se be c a u se it wa s c le ar that the re wa s no ba sis for subje c t m atte r jurisdic tion. W e de ny the Appe lla

nts’ m otion for judic ia l notic e (Dkt. No. 71). AFFIRM E D.

2
Exhibit 99.6



CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of DHX Media
Ltd., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2016, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2016 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DHX
Media Ltd. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any
obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



Date: September 28, 2016



|/s/ Dana Sean Landry          | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Dana Sean Landry              | 
|Chief Executive Officer       | 
|(principal executive officer) |