alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Petitioner: 

Creation View Imaging, Inc. 

Nevin E. Smith, Jr. 

Assistant ChiefPilot 

2604 Aga Drive 

Alexandria, MN 56308 

Tel: 320-491-6654 

Email: nevin@cvi-unmanned.com 

Website: www. Cvi-unmanned.com 

Greetings, 

Application to Amend 

Section 333 Exemption No. 14794 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-3592 

Creation 

View 

!maging 

8 March2016 

') 

By letter from the FAA dated February 11, 2016, an exemption was granted to Creation View Imaging, Inc. for 

relief under Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 14794 Regulatory Docket No. FAA2015-3592. 

Creation View Imaging, Inc. hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include the following 

UAV's: Dll Matrice, Dll Phantom 4 (both small UA V quad-copters) and the Dll F550 and Tarot 680 Pro (small 

UAV hex-copters). Relevant filets and reasoning are: 

-The Dll Matrice and Dll Phantom 4 are both part of the Dll family of quadcopters which was previously 

approved for our use. The Dll F550 and the Tarot 680 Pro hexcopters also fall within our previous approval of 

small UAV's. All ofthese UAV's use the same basic flight control systems and RC transmitters and are built with 

similar components as previously approved under FAA Exemption No. 14794. All of these UAV's are smaller in 

size than the Dll S900 hexcopter which was previously approved under FAA Exemption No. 14794. 

-The findings, rationale and conclusions contained in FAA's Exemption No. 14794 apply without 

modification to this application. 

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional information that may 

be required. 

Sincerely, 

'J~~ "Nevin E. Smith, Jr. 

Creation View Imaging, Inc. 

Assistant Chief Pilot
The H onorable Michael James Davis, United States District Judge for th e 1 District of Minnesota. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-1926

_____________ Vera Lois Erickson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. University of Minnesota; Regents of * the University of Minnesota, * [UNPUBLISHED] * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: May 22, 1997 Filed: May 27, 1997

_____________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Vera Lois Erickson appeals the Distri ct Court's judgment in favor of defendants. 1 Having reviewed the record and the parties' submission, we conclude the judgment o f theDistrict Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Having previously granted in part appellant's motion to include trial exhibits in the appellate-2-

record, we deny the motion to the extent appellant seeks to include any additiona l exhibits. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 53646.

protest 129348-K (New York).

#### Wimelbacher & Rice *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
----

|   | By:    | /s/ Gary R. Vaughan    |
|--------|--------|------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Gary R. Vaughan  |
|   |   | Its: Managing Director |
|   |   |                   |
|   | By:    | /s/ David Co           |
|   |   | Name: David Co         |
|   |   | Its: Director          |
|   |   |                   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Matt Bowen         |
|   |   | Name: Matt Bowen       |
|   |   | Its: Managing Director |
|   |   |                   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Kevin Fischer      |
|   |   | Name: Kevin Fischer    |
|   |   | Its: Director          |
|   |   |                   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Robert Frier       |
|   |   | Name: Robert Frier     |
|   |   | Its: Director          |

|   |   |                |
|--------|--------|---------------------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Jenna Kaufman   |
|   |   | Name: Jenna Kaufman |
|   |   | Its: Director       |

| - 18 - |
|--------|
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Timothy P. Lynch, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tercica, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2004
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(File No. 333-82124) and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-41366,333-41360, 333-68306 and 333-122787) ofMediacom Communications Corporation of our report dated March 15, 2005, relating to the financialstatements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which are included in this Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
Exhibit 23.2       To the Board of Directors Ableauctions.com, Inc. and Subsidiaries        Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm   We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report, dated March 15, 2006, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB covering the consolidated financial statements of Ableauctions.com, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005 and to the incorporation of our report into the registration statements on Form S-8 of Ableauctions.com, Inc. and subsidiaries, which were filed with the Commission as numbers 333-117979, 333-114906, 333-32740, 333106102, 333-106101, 333-106005, 333-87800 and 333-32740, and on Form S-3, which were filed with the Commission as numbers 333-112504 and 333-109844.    /s/ Cinnamon Jang Willoughby & Company  CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS  Burnaby, BC March 28, 2007
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Soon Do Kwon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mirae Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 16, 2007



/s/ Soon Do KwonName:

Soon Do KwonTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
#### Luther G. Smith v. Edmund Canfield and another.

Partners must sue in tlieir individual names. A writ of replevin issued on belialf of partners in the name of their firm is a nullity.

*Submitted on brief October*9th.

*Decided October*13th.

Error to Manistee Circuit.

*Pond & PusselL*for plaintiff in error.

There was no appearance for defendants in error.

Manning J.:

The writ of replevin is in the name of E. *&*J. Can-field, plaintiff. In the affidavit annexed to the writ, John Canfield is described as the plaintiff, and the declaration is in the name of Edmund Canfield and John Canfield. Defendant made a motion to quash the writ and subsequent proceedings, but did not enter his appearance in the cause, or further appear therein after the motion was denied. The writ of replevin was a nullity, as no person was named in it as plaintiff. E. & J. Canfield, the proceedings show, was the name of a partnership. Partners can not sue in the name of the firm.

The judgment is reversed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 6208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01988]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 68

[Docket No. DOD-2009-OS-0034]
RIN 0790-AI50

Voluntary Education Programs

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule; notice of stay.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Friday, December 7, 2012 (77 FR 72941-72956), the 
Department of Defense published a final rule in the Federal Register 
titled Voluntary Education Programs. Subsequent to the publication of 
that rule, the Department discovered that the effective date in the 
DATES section was calculated incorrectly. The DoD is taking action to 
stay the rule to the appropriate effective date.

DATES: Effective January 30, 2013, 32 CFR part 68 is stayed until 
February 5, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Toppings, 571-372-0485.

    Dated: January 25, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013-01988 Filed 1-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000046

18-JUN-2013

10:31 AM
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOHN EDWIN NAIL
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No s . 4D 18

- 2216 and 4D18

- 2338

[ September 12, 2019 ]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Lawrence M. Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 16000809CFAXMX and 16001331CFAXMX

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, f or appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS
, T AYLO R and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# O'IGT INAI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 22-0004 

### SEP 

## 2 7 2022 IN RE PETITION OF SEAN MICHAEL HELLE FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE BAR OF MONTANA Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Sean Michael Helle has petitioned for reinstatement to active status in the StateBar ofMontana. Helle voluntarily choseto move to inactive status in April 2013. Helle is not currently practicinglaw in anotherjurisdiction or employed asa law clerk. It istheCourt's practice in such cases, given the amount oftime since Helle has been on active status, to require a character and fitness review and the completion of continuing education. Therefore, I I IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner shall submit to an investigation conducted by the Commission on Character and Fitness, which, in its discretion, may be a limited investigation. Petitioner shall comply with the character and fitness process and timely produce information and documentation as requested by the Commission. The Commissionwill investigatePetitioner'scharacterand fitness inaccordancewith the Rules ofProcedure ofthe Commission on Character and Fitness. The Commission will advise the Court whether the Petitioner has been certified, conditionally certified, or denied certification. Ifthe Commission denies certification, the Commission will issue written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a decision pursuant to Section 5(c)(6) of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission on Character and Fitness. If the Petitioner is certified or conditionally certified by the Commission on Character and Fitness, the Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice of law in Montana upon payment of appropriate dues and fees and penalties to the State Bar ofMontana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, ifadmitted, within six rnonths ofadmission to the active practice of law, Petitioner shall submit to the Board of Continuing Legal Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena, MT 59624, proof of attendance at thirty hours of 09/27/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0004

### approved ContinuingLegal Education tobe credited to the tirne Petitionerwason inactive

status. Thismay include approved credits previously obtained by Petitioner duringthe last twoyears, ifany. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. `1 1

. DATED thise+ day ofSeptember, 2022.

ChiefJustice

L___4 4/ ..oe„0"

eS 2 4( .411 8 ,... Justices
No. 76-6073.

#### Scott *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 26, 2007, Stepan Company, Natural Products Dept., 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New Jersey 07607, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II: Drug
ScheduleCocaine (9041)
IIEcgonine (9180)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, Washington, DC 20537; or any being sent via express mail should be sent to DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be filed no later than May 29, 2007. Dated: March 19, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E7-5509 Filed 3-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) will submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
    Title: Short Supply Regulations, Petroleum (Crude Oil).
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0694-0027.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection of 
information.
    Burden: 138 hours.
    Average Time per Response: 40 minutes to 8 hours per response.
    Number of Respondents: 21 respondents.
    Needs and Uses: The information is collected in the form of 
supporting documentation for license applications to export petroleum 
(crude oil) and is used by licensing officers to determine the 
exporters compliance with the five statutes governing this collection.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit organizations.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, e-mail address, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7f3d6c1ded3e8e5d8c4c3dcd2c5f7d8dad599d2d8c799d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbffdacdd2dfe4e9d4c8cfd0dec9fbd4d6d995ded4cb95dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>, or fax number, (202) 395-7285.

    Dated: March 23, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-5727 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 53090.

#### Barker Bros. Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 77149-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.