2198 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 11 / Thursday, January 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

Dated: December 29, 2006. 

Gary Gulezian, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Air pollution control, Carbon 

monoxide, Particulate matter, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

■ Part 52 of chapter I, title 40, Code of 

Federal Regulations, is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart YY—Wisconsin 

■ 2. Section 52.2570 is amended by 

revising paragraph (c)(98) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2570 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(98) On November 6, 1996, the State 

of Wisconsin submitted rules pertaining 

to requirements under the Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration program. 

Wisconsin also submitted rule packages 

as revisions to the state implementation 

plans for particulate matter and 

revisions to the state implementation 

plans for clarification changes. 

(i) Incorporated by reference. The 

following sections of the Wisconsin 

Administrative Code (WAC) are 

incorporated by reference. Both rule 

packages, AM–27–94 and AM–9–95, 

were published in the (Wisconsin) 

Register in April 1995, No. 472, and 

became effective May 1, 1995. AM–27–

94 modifies Chapter NR, Sections 

400.02(39m), 404.05, 405.02, 405.07, 

405.08, 405.10, 405.14, and 484.04 of 

the WAC. AM–9–95 modifies Chapter 

NR, Sections 30.03, 30.04, 400 Note, 

400.02, 400.03, 401.04, 404.06, 405.01, 

405.02, 405.04, 405.05, 405.07, 405.08, 

405.10, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411, 415, 

417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 

425, 426, 429, 436, 438, 439, 447, 448, 

449, 484, 485, 488, 493, and 499 of the 

WAC. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. E7–521 Filed 1–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 300 

[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–0008; FRL–8268–6] 

National Oil and Hazardous 

Substances Pollution Contingency 

Plan; National Priorities List 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final notice of deletion of 

the Berkley Products Company Dump 

Superfund Site from the National 

Priorities List. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Region III is publishing a 

direct final notice of deletion for 

Berkley Products Company Dump 

Superfund Site (Site), located in West 

Cocalico Township, Lancaster County, 

Pennsylvania from the National 

Priorities List (NPL). 

The NPL constitutes Appendix B of 

40 CFR Part 300, which is the National 

Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA 

promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (CERCLA). This direct final deletion 

is being published by EPA with 

concurrence of the Commonwealth of 

Pennsylvania, through the Pennsylvania 

Department of Environmental Protection 

(PADEP) because EPA has determined 

that all appropriate response actions 

under CERCLA, other than operation 

and maintenance and five-year reviews, 

have been implemented to protect 

human health, welfare and the 

environment. However, this deletion 

does not preclude future actions under 

Superfund. 

DATES: This direct final deletion will be 

effective March 19, 2007 unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by February 

20, 2007. If adverse comments are 

received, EPA will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final deletion 

in the Federal Register informing the 

public that the deletion will not take 

effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–

SFUND–1989–0008, by one of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instruction for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: schrock.roy@epa.gov. 

• Fax: 215–814–3002 

• Mail: Mr. Roy Schrock, Remedial 

Project Manager (3HS22), U.S. EPA, 

Region 3, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103–

2029. 

• Hand Delivery: 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103–

2029. Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Docket’s normal hours of 

operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–

0008. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an e-mail 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the EPA’s Region III, Regional Center for 

Environmental Information (RCEI) 2nd 

floor, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania, 19103–1029, (215) 814–

5254 or (800) 553–2509, Monday 

through Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

excluding legal holidays and at the West 

Cocalico Township Municipal Building, 

156B West Main, West Cocalico 

Township, Reinholds, Pennsylvania 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 11 / Thursday, January 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 2199 

17569, (717) 336–8720, Monday through 

Friday 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Roy Schrock, Remedial Project Manager 

(3HS22), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103–

2029; telephone number: 1–800–553–

2509 or (215) 814–3210; fax number: 

215–814–3002; e-mail address: 

schrock.roy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. NPL Deletion Criteria 

III. Deletion Procedures 

IV. Basis for Site Deletion 

V. Deletion Action 

I. Introduction 

EPA Region III is publishing this 

direct final notice of deletion of the 

Berkley Products Company Dump 

Superfund Site from the NPL. 

EPA identifies sites that appear to 

present a significant risk to public 

health or the environment and 

maintains the NPL as the list of those 

sites. As described in § 300.425(e)(3) of 

the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL 

remain eligible for remedial actions in 

the unlikely event that future conditions 

warrant such action. 

Because EPA considers this action to 

be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is 

taking it without prior publication of a 

notice of intent to delete. This action 

will be effective March 19, 2007 unless 

EPA receives adverse comments on this 

document by February 20, 2007. If 

adverse comments on this document are 

received within the 30-day public 

comment period, EPA will publish a 

timely withdrawal of this direct final 

deletion before the effective date of the 

deletion and the deletion will not take 

effect. EPA, as appropriate, will prepare 

a response to comments and continue 

with the deletion process on the basis of 

the notice of intent to delete and the 

comments already received. There will 

be no additional opportunity to 

comment. 

Section II of this document explains 

the criteria for deleting sites from the 

NPL. Section III discusses the 

procedures that EPA is using for this 

action. Section IV discusses the Berkley 

Products Company Dump Superfund 

Site and explains how the Site meets the 

deletion criteria. Section V discusses 

EPA’s action to delete the Site from the 

NPL unless adverse comments are 

received during the public comment 

period. 

II. NPL Deletion Criteria 

Section 300.425(e)(1) of the NCP 

provides that sites may be deleted from 

the NPL where no further response is 

appropriate. In making a determination 

to delete a site from the NPL, EPA shall 

consider, in consultation with the State, 

whether any of the following criteria 

have been met: 

(i) The responsible parties or other 

parties have implemented all 

appropriate response actions required; 

or 

(ii) All appropriate Fund-financed 

(Hazardous Substance Superfund 

Response Trust Fund) responses under 

CERCLA have been implemented and 

no further action by responsible parties 

is appropriate; or 

(iii) The remedial investigation has 

shown that the site poses no significant 

threat to public health or the 

environment and, therefore, remedial 

measures are not appropriate. 

Even if a site is deleted from the NPL, 

if hazardous substances, pollutants, or 

contaminants remain at the site above 

levels that allow for unlimited use and 

unrestricted exposure, CERCLA Section 

121(c), 42 U.S.C. 9621(c), requires that 

a subsequent review of the site be 

conducted at least every five years after 

the initiation of the remedial action to 

ensure that the action remains 

protective of public health and the 

environment. If new information 

becomes available which indicates a 

need for further action, EPA may initiate 

such remedial actions. Whenever there 

is a significant release from a site 

deleted from the NPL, the deleted site 

may be restored to the NPL without 

application of the hazard ranking 

system. 

III. Deletion Procedures 

The following procedures were used 

for the intended deletion of this Site: 

1. EPA consulted with PADEP on the 

deletion of the Site from the NPL prior 

to developing this direct final notice of 

deletion. 

2. PADEP has concurred with the 

deletion of the Site from the NPL. 

3. Concurrently with the publication 

of this direct final notice of deletion, a 

notice of the availability of the parallel 

notice of intent to delete published 

today in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ Section 

of the Federal Register is being 

published in a major local newspaper of 

general circulation at or near the Site 

and is being distributed to appropriate 

Federal, State, and local government 

officials and other interested parties; the 

newspaper notice announces the 30-day 

public comment period concerning the 

notice of intent to delete the Site from 

the NPL. 

4. EPA Region III has placed copies of 

documents supporting the deletion in 

the Site information repositories 

identified above. 

5. If adverse comments on this notice 

or the companion notice of intent to 

delete also published in today’s Federal 

Register are received within the 30-day 

public comment period, EPA will 

publish a timely notice of withdrawal of 

this direct final notice of deletion before 

the effective date. EPA will prepare a 

response to comments and continue 

with the deletion process on the basis of 

the notice of intent to delete and the 

comments already received. 

Deletion of the Site from the NPL does 

not itself create, alter, or revoke any 

individual’s rights or obligations. 

Deletion of a site from the NPL does not 

in any way alter EPA’s right to take 

enforcement actions, as appropriate. 

The NPL is designed primarily for 

informational purposes and to assist 

EPA management. Section 300.425(e)(3) 

of the NCP states that the deletion of a 

site from the NPL does not preclude 

eligibility for future response actions, 

should future conditions warrant such 

actions. 

IV. Basis for Site Deletion 

The following summary provides 

EPA’s rationale for the deleting this Site 

from the NPL: 

Site Location 

The Berkley Products Company Dump 

Site (Site) is located one and a half 

miles northeast of Denver, 

Pennsylvania, in West Cocalico 

Township, Lancaster County. Also 

known as Schoeneck Landfill, the Site 

is east of Wollups Hill Road, north of 

Swamp Bridge Road. 

The Site is approximately 1,000 feet 

west of Cocalico Creek. The headwaters 

of Cocalico Creek are in the valley south 

of South Mountain near Blue Lake. This 

valley is located a few miles north of the 

Site. Conestoga Creek, along with its 

tributaries, Muddy Creek, Little 

Conestoga Creek, and Cocalico Creek, 

drains the northeastern and northcentral portion of Lancaster County and 

eventually enters the Susquehanna 

River. Seasonally, wet springs located 

immediately north of the Site discharge 

into Cocalico Creek to the north. On the 

southern side of the Site, a seep was 

located on the slope of the landfill 

material. The seep was related to rain 

events. 

The land use in the immediate 

vicinity of the Site is residential in 

nature. The Site is near dense woods 

and several single family homes. A few 

open areas have been converted into 

farm land by the local residents 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
2200 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 11 / Thursday, January 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

Site History 

The Site was used as a municipal 

waste dump from approximately 1930 

until 1965. In 1965, the Lipton Paint 

Company (Lipton), a subsidiary of 

Berkley Products Company, purchased 

the property. The operation continued 

to receive household trash from 

neighboring communities as well as 

paint wastes from Berkley Products 

Company. The property was closed by 

Lipton due to a lack of available fill 

area, and was covered with soil. Then, 

in September 1970, the property was 

sold to private owners and has been 

used as a residence since that time. 

Prior to 1965, the dump received 

paper, wood, cardboard and other 

domestic trash from the northeastern 

corner of Lancaster County. The only 

commercial wastes identified during 

that period were from local shoe 

companies. Those wastes included 

leather scraps and empty glue and dye 

pails. 

During the period from 1965 to 1970, 

different sources estimate that the dump 

received a total of 650 to 40,000 gallons 

of paint wastes from Berkley Products 

Company. These wastes included 

primarily pigment sludges and wash 

solvents. EPA has learned that the 

solvents were sometimes used to burn 

the household trash and that the sludges 

were disposed of in five gallon pails. 

Information gathered about the final 

years of operation of the Site indicates 

that the municipal trash was dumped to 

the south of the access road, toward the 

hillside, while the paint wastes were 

deposited in the northern part of the 

dump. 

The Berkley Products Company 

produced paints and varnishes with 

solvents, ethyl cellulose resin and 

pigments with lead oxide and lead 

chromate. The solvents included 

toluene, xylene, aliphatic naphthas, 

mineral spirits, methyl ethyl ketones, 

methyl isobutyl ketones, ethyl acetate, 

butyl acetate, glycol ether, butyl celasol, 

methyl alcohol and isopropyl alcohol. 

This Site was originally investigated 

by the Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Resources (PADER) in 

1984. In March of that year, PADER 

completed a Potential Hazardous Waste 

Site Identification form and the Site was 

included on EPA’s CERCLIS, a list of 

potentially hazardous waste sites. A 

Preliminary Assessment (PA) was also 

completed in 1984, by EPA, and the Site 

was scheduled for further investigation 

pursuant to the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation 

and Liability Act, as amended, 

(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675. 

In July 1984, EPA collected field 

samples and the results were presented 

in a Site Investigation (SI) report dated 

March 5, 1986. The information from 

the SI was used to score the Site using 

the Hazard Ranking System. The Site 

was nominated for the National 

Priorities List (NPL) of Superfund sites 

in 1986 with a score of 30.00 and was 

finalized as an NPL site in March 1989. 

The regulations enacted pursuant to 

CERCLA generally require that a 

Remedial Investigation and Feasibility 

Study (RI/FS) be conducted at each NPL 

site and subsequently, a remedial 

response action selected to address the 

problems identified. 

During the search for potentially 

responsible parties (PRP) for the Site 

EPA conducted interviews with former 

owners, operators and employees of the 

Site. Company records were also 

obtained and deed information was 

researched. That information has been 

compiled and reviewed to determine 

liability and also to estimate types and 

quantities of wastes disposed at the Site 

and to determine disposal practices 

during operations. Based on the findings 

of the PRP search, EPA sent Notice 

Letters to two parties, Berkley Products 

Company and the landowner that had 

purchased the closed landfill. These 

Notice Letters identified the parties as 

PRPs, but waived the sixty day 

moratorium, established at CERCLA 

Sections 122(a) and 122(e), to negotiate 

a Consent Order to perform the RI/FS. 

These waivers were issued pursuant to 

CERCLA Section 122(a) because the 

Berkley Products Company did not have 

the financial assets to pay for the 

remedy, and the current landowners 

had purchased the property after 

landfill operations had ceased. 

EPA initiated the RI/FS in 1990 to 

identify the types, quantities and 

locations of contaminants, to evaluate 

the potential risks, and to develop and 

evaluate remedial action alternatives to 

address the contamination problems at 

this Site. A CERCLA removal action was 

completed at the Site in May 1992 to 

address some preliminary findings of 

the RI. During the field investigation of 

the RI, buried drums containing paint 

wastes were uncovered in the 

northeastern portion of the Site. This 

area was excavated, and 59 drums were 

overpacked and removed. An additional 

seven drums were overpacked and 

removed from the southern slope of the 

landfill. A 35-foot-long by 15-foot-deep 

exploration trench uncovered no 

additional drums. The wastes were 

classified as Polychlorinated Biphenyl 

(PCB) flammable liquids, solids, and 

paint solvents. 

The field investigations, data analysis 

and evaluation of alternatives that 

comprise the RI/FS were completed in 

June 1996 for the Site. 

Record of Decision Findings 

The Remedial Investigation found the 

Site to be a landfill covering 

approximately 41⁄2 acres situated on the 

crest of a hill. The landfill materials 

were composed of primarily municipal 

trash and debris along with an area of 

buried steel drums and residues of 

apparent dumping of organic 

compounds as well as paint and organic 

solvents. 

The risks involved a direct contact 

threat and possible impacts on 

residential well water supplies in the 

area. The Site also showed the potential 

for ecological risks. 

Monitoring wells at the perimeter of 

the landfill contained organic 

compound and a variety of compounds 

were detected. Some of the compounds 

identified were lead, benzene, 

trichloroethylene (TCE), 

tetrachloroethylene (PCE), polyaromatic 

(PAHs) hydrocarbons and 

polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). 

On June 28, 1996, EPA issued a ROD 

for the Site which required the 

following components: 

• Pre-design investigations and 

activities. 

• Site preparation. 

• Consolidation of landfill wastes. 

• Site grading. 

• Cover system placement, with the 

following components as determined 

necessary for compliance with the 

relevant sections of Pennsylvania’s 

Hazardous Waste Regulations: 

—Subgrade. 

—Gas vent system. 

—Barrier layers. 

—Drainage layer. 

—Top layer (vegetated). 

• Security fencing. 

• Removal actions as determined to 

be necessary during consolidation 

activities, and to be conducted in 

compliance with all state and local 

laws, to the extent not inconsistent with 

federal laws. 

• Erosion control measures. 

• Long-term monitoring to include 

groundwater, surface runoff, leachate 

spring and seep monitoring (annual), 

reside residential well monitoring 

(semi-annual) and monitoring wells 

(quarterly). 

• Institutional controls to restrict new 

well installation in the contaminated 

zone. 

• Long-term operation and 

maintenance of the remedy. 

• Five-year reviews. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 11 / Thursday, January 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 2201 

On August 20, 1999 an Explanation of 

Significant Differences was issued 

which revised the remedy. The ROD 

anticipated that the bulk of the 

consolidated wastes at the Site would be 

incorporated into the on-site landfill 

and capped in place. During the design 

of the cap, the volume of the waste to 

be consolidated was determined to 

exceed the capacity of the cap being 

designed for the designated landfill 

area. Therefore, the ESD required 

excavation, characterization, and offsite 

disposal of the excess waste materials. 

Then the on-site landfill could be 

capped as described in the ROD. 

Operation and Maintenance 

The first round of surface water and 

groundwater monitoring occurred in 

October 2002. After this sampling event, 

sampling the surface water and springs 

was discontinued because no 

contaminants were detected in the seeps 

and creek north of the landfill and 

upgradient from the Site. Sampling the 

leachate seep from the landfill was also 

discontinued because the cover 

eliminated the seep. 

Operation and Maintenance (O&M) 

activities were transferred to the 

Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Resources (PADEP) after 

this sampling event since there was no 

responsible party capable of performing 

the work for the Site. URS Corporation 

(URS) was contracted in June 2003 by 

the PADEP to complete the post-closure 

operations and maintenance. Quarterly 

site inspections and monitoring were 

initiated in 2003. 

A number of monitoring wells are 

located at the Site and between the 

landfill and the residential wells. There 

are approximately 14 residential wells 

that are also monitored under the O&M 

plan. 

Groundwater monitoring and 

sampling was conducted during the 

spring of 2004, the fall of 2004, the 

spring of 2005 and the spring of 2006. 

Activities performed by URS also 

include inspections of both sediment 

basins. 

Mowing the vegetation on the cap is 

conducted under a separate contract 

issued by PADEP on a yearly basis. 

Five Year Review 

CERCLA requires a five-year review of 

all sites where hazardous substances 

remain above health-based levels which 

prevents unlimited use and unrestricted 

exposure. The first five-year review for 

the Site was completed in August 2005. 

The five-year review found that the 

objectives of the ROD and ESD were met 

by the implemented remedy. Periodic 

monitoring conducted by EPA and 

PADEP indicate that the selected 

remedies have been effective in 

eliminating the environmental threats 

posed by the landfill to the surrounding 

environment and human populations. 

Five-year reviews will continue to be 

conducted. 

Institutional Controls 

The institutional controls to restrict 

new well installation in the 

contaminated zone were established on 

June 8, 2001 by an Access Order issued 

during the construction phase of the 

remedial action and are still in effect. 

The Access Order required that the 

property owner shall not interfere with 

the operation, alter or disturb the 

integrity, of any structures or devices 

now or hereinafter built, installed or 

otherwise placed by EPA and/or its 

Representatives on the Site or Property. 

This effectively prevents any well 

installation through the cap, which 

covers the contaminated zone. 

Maintenance of the institutional control 

is part of the O&M activities conducted 

by PADEP pursuant to the State 

Superfund Contract (SSC). 

Community Involvement 

Public participation activities have 

been satisfied as required by CERCLA 

Sections 113(k) and 117, 42 U.S.C. 

9613(k) and 9617. Documents upon 

which EPA relied to make this 

recommendation to delete the Site from 

the NPL are available to the public in 

the information repositories. 

V. Deletion Action 

EPA, with the concurrence of the 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, has 

determined that all appropriate 

responses under CERCLA have been 

completed, and that no further response 

action, other than operation and 

maintenance and five-year reviews, are 

necessary. Therefore, EPA is deleting 

the Site from the NPL. 

Because EPA considers this action to 

be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is 

taking it without prior publication of a 

notice of intent to delete. This action 

will be effective March 19, 2007 unless 

EPA receives adverse comments by 

February 20, 2007. If adverse comments 

are received within the 30-day public 

comment period, EPA will publish a 

timely withdrawal of this direct final 

notice of deletion before the effective 

date of the deletion and it will not take 

effect. EPA will also prepare a response 

to comments and continue with the 

deletion process on the basis of the 

notice of intent to delete and the 

comments already received. There will 

be no additional opportunity to 

comment. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous 

waste, Hazardous substances, 

Intergovernmental relation, Penalties, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Superfund, Water 

pollution control, Water supply. 

Dated: November 16, 2006. 

Donald Welsh, 

Regional Administrator, Region III. 

■ For the reasons set out in this 

document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended 

as follows: 

PART 300—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 300 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 

9601–9657; E.O. 21777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 

1991 Comp., p/351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 

3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193. 

Appendix B—[Amended] 

■ 2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300 

is amended under Pennsylvania (‘‘PA’’) 

by removing the entry for ‘‘Berkley 

Products Co. Dump’’. 

[FR Doc. E7–537 Filed 1–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 679 

[Docket No. 060216045–6045–01; I.D. 

011107A] 

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic 

Zone Off Alaska; Atka Mackerel Lottery 

in Areas 542 and 543 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notification of fishery 

assignments. 

SUMMARY: NMFS is notifying the owners 

and operators of registered vessels of 

their assignments for the 2007 A season 

Atka mackerel fishery in harvest limit 

area (HLA) 542 and/or 543 of the 

Aleutian Islands subarea of the Bering 

Sea and Aleutian Islands management 

area (BSAI). This action is necessary to 

allow the harvest of the 2007 A season 

HLA limits established for area 542 and 

area 543 pursuant to the 2006 and 2007 

harvest specifications for groundfish in 

the BSAI. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES