alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, May 3, 2012.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 12

- 00138

- CR

____________

KHALEEM HASAN GUILLO RY , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 183rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Tri al Court Cause No. 1322045



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 9, 2012 , 2012. See Tex. R. App.

P. 35.1. On April 16, 2012 , this court i ssued an order for Janet Ragan to file the

reporters record on or before May 16, 2012 . To date, the record has not been filed with

the court. Because the reporter’s record will not be filed within the time prescribed in the

first order , the court GRANTS your request and issue s the following order.

We order Janet Ragan , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal

on or before June 11, 2012

. No further extension will be entertained . The trial andappellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely

fi led. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Janet Ragan does not timely file the record as

ordered, the Court may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to

determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.10.4

January 22, 2001

Bruce R. Worthington, Esq.
SVP and General Counsel
PG&E Corporation
One Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA  94105

Dear Bruce:

You are an essential member of our senior executive team and I view your
contribution as vital to getting the Corporation through its current challenges,
achieving the Corporation's objectives, and providing strong returns to
shareholders.

The Board of Directors recently approved a Senior Executive Retention program
which includes you.  Under this program, you will receive a grant of phantom
PG&E Corporation restricted stock units granted under the PG&E Corporation Long-
Term Incentive Plan.  The amount of your grant is $1,250,000 and it translates
into 128,205 units calculated at the closing price of PG&E Corporation common
stock on January 22, 2001, of $9.75 per share.  An extremely small number of
individuals are included in this arrangement.  For this reason, it is absolutely
necessary for you to restrict any conversation on this subject to me or Brent
Stanley.

Your grant of phantom PG&E Corporation restricted stock units is effective
January 22, 2001, and will vest on December 31, 2004, subject to either one of
the following conditions:

  -  50 percent will automatically vest on December 31, 2004. The remaining 50
     percent will vest on December 31, 2004 only if the Corporation's
     performance, as measured by relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) on a
     cumulative basis over four years, is at or above the 55th percentile of its
     comparator group; or

  -  if, at the end of the third year of the grant, December 31, 2003, the
     Corporation's performance as measured by relative TSR on a cumulative
     basis, is at or above the 75th percentile of its comparator group, the
     entire grant will vest.

You may elect to defer your actual award payments under the PG&E Corporation
Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan prior to the award cliff-vesting.  Such
deferrals will be made in PG&E Corporation phantom stock units on the first
business day of January of the year following vesting.  Awards not deferred will
be paid either entirely in PG&E Corporation stock or half in PG&E Corporation
stock and half in cash in January of the year following vesting.

Bruce, I look forward to your continued strong contributions to PG&E
Corporation's success.

Sincerely,

ROBERT D. GLYNN, JR.
IN THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

_____________________ _____

09-17-00326-CR

__________________________

Appeal from the 258th District Court of Polk County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 24667

MANDATE

TO THE 258TH DISTRICT COURT OF POLK COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals, on October 18, 2017, the cause came upon 

appeal to revise or reverse your judgment was determined; and therein our said 

Court made its order in these words:

“THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the appeal should be dismissed. IT IS THEREFORE 

ORDERED, in accordance with the Court’s opinion, that the appeal is 

DISMISSED.”

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said 

Court in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.

BY ORDER OF THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS, with the Seal thereof 

affixed, at the City of Beaumont, Texas, this December 12, 2017.

CAROL ANNE HARLEY

CLERK OF THE COURT

Ex Parte Billy Wayne Barton, Appellant
No. 49759.

#### Protests 18403-K, etc., of Helen M. Majo et al. (Duluth, etc.).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

An examination of the official records disclosed nothing to warrant disturbing the decision of the collector which was held presumptively, correct. The protests were therefore overruled.
JACKIE LIGE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1828

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 12, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John L. Miller, Judge.

Jackie Lige, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Henry Coyle, *Respondent, v.*The Father Mathew Total Abstinence Benefit Society, *Appellant.*

— Judgment of County Court affirmed, witli costs. Opinion by Pratt, J.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff

FRESH FIELDS MARKETS, INC. AND ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

v. Record No. 1939-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM VALERIE SMITH MARCH 19, 1996

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Benjamin J. Trichilo; Trichilo, Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath & Judkins, on briefs), for appellants. (Metin A. Cay; Swiger & Cay, on brief), for appellee.

Fresh Fields Markets, Inc. and its insurer (hereinafter collectively referred to as "employer") contend that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that (1) Valerie Smith's tendinitis and myofascial pain syndrome qualify as occupational "diseases" under the Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act"); and (2) Smith made a reasonable effort to market her residual work capacity. This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in Stenrich Group v. Jemmott , ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act"). Because Stenrich is

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 dispositive of this appeal, we need not address employer's second question presented. Accordingly, we reverse the commission's decision.

Reversed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362]


Southern California Edison Company, San Diego Gas and Electric 
Company, the City of Riverside, CA, Notice of Withdrawal of Application 
for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Southern California Edison (the licensee) to withdraw 
its February 28, 2006, application for proposed amendment to Facility 
Operating License Nos. NPF-10 and NPF-15 for the San Onofre Nuclear 
Generating Station, Units 2 and 3, located in San Diego County, 
California.
    The proposed amendment would have revised Technical Specifications 
(TSs) 3.8.1, ``AC [alternating current] Sources--Operating,'' 3.8.4, 
``DC [direct current] Sources--Operating,'' 3.8.5, ``DC Sources--
Shutdown,'' 3.8.6, ``Battery Cell Parameters,'' 3.8.7, ``Inverters--
Operating,'' and 3.8.9, ``Distribution Systems--Operating.'' This 
change would have also added a new Battery Monitoring and Maintenance 
Program, Section 5.5.2.16.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on July 5, 2006 
(71 FR 38185). However, by letter dated March 15, 2007, the licensee 
withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated February 28, 2006, and the licensee's 
letter dated March 15, 2007, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the 
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 
Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically 
from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) 
Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, 
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Persons who do not have access to 
ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in 
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-
397-4209, or 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e3938791a38d9180cd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4a4b0a694baa6b7fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of March 2007.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Nageswaran Kalyanam,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, Division of Operating 
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
 [FR Doc. E7-5936 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Lee, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 468]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered November 12, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and sentencing him to concurrent terms of *81⁄3*years to life and *21⁄3*to 7 years, respectively, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence on the conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree to a term of 5 years to life and otherwise affirmed.

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.
#### Dixon v Ford Motor Company.

(Docket No. 59761.)

*Philip Green,*Special Counsel, for Civil Rights Commission. *James R. Jackson*and *Paul R. Caldwell*for defendant-appellee.

Rehearing denied.

Reported at 402 Mich *ante,*p 315.
---

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Horst Zerbe, Chief Executive Officer of IntelGenx Technologies Corp. (the
"Registrant"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB
of the Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any
change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2008

/s/ Horst Zerbe 
----------------------------------- 
Horst Zerbe 
Chief Executive Officer

---
(Reap. Dec. 10508)

#### Quon Quon Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 32360; 67711.

(Decided April 14, 1963)

*Stein é ShostaJc*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, consists of baskets in chief value of leather, etc., exported from Japan; and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values, net packed, less ocean freight.

> That all the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement was entered subsequent to February 27,1958.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise the subject of this stipulation is not included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for re-appraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for a decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question *468and that such, values for the merchandise covered by the involved appeals are the invoice unit values, net, packed, less ocean freight.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
**Exhibit 10.4**

October 29, 2002

 

DDS Technologies Ltd.

        The undersigned Mr.Ben Marcovitch and Mr. Joseph Fasciglione, hereby undertake (a) to indemnify andhold harmless DDS Technologies Ltd. and its shareholders from and against anyliability, loss and/or damage incurred by DDS Technologies Ltd. and/or itsshareholders arising or deriving from any action, claim or demand brought by anythird party, including Black Diamond Industries Inc., as a consequence of therepresentations and warranties made by DDS Technologies Ltd., as a Transferor,to Black Diamond Industries Inc. according to the provisions of the SecuritiesExchange Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and (b) not to take anyaction which might affect or impair the economical and financial value of theinterest of DDS Technologies Ltd. in Black Diamond Industries Inc. and/or anyaction as a result of which the interest of DDS Technologies Ltd. in BlackDiamond Industries Inc. might be disproportionately diluted in comparison withother Black Diamond Industries Inc. shareholders' interests as of at the ClosingDate of the Securities Exchange Agreement.

Best regards,

_____________________________Mr. Ben Marcovitch

 

/s/ Joseph Fasciglione                          Mr. Joseph Fasciglione
#### State of Florida, *ex rel.*W. J. Meredith, L. F. Rogers and James G. Martin, v. Fred P. Cone, J. M. Lee and , W. V. Knott, as and constituting the Board of Administration of the State, Fred P. Cone, as President of said Board of Administration, J. M. Lee, as Secretary of said Board of Administration, and W. V. Knott, as Treasurer of said Board of Administration, and as County Treasurer *ex officio*of Hardee County, W. C. King, M. V. Altman, Frank A. Chambless, C. D. Ivey and B. A. Prescott, as and constituting the Board of County Commissioners of Hardee County.

177 So. 546.

Case No. 2533.

Order Entered December 3, 1937.

*D. C. Hull,*and *Hull, Landis & Whitehair,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, *J. Compton French,*
      *316Assistant Attorney General, and *Doyle E.*Carlton, for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

The attorneys for the respective parties having filed in this Court a stipulation signed by the attorneys for plaintiffs in error and by the attorneys for de•fendants in error in and by which stipulation it is agreed by and between said attorneys that the supersedeas bond filed in connection with the writ of error taken to the final judgment entered in this cause in the Court below be discharged and cancelled, that the respondents in the Court below, now defendants in error, by said stipulation waive any and all right to file further pleadings in this cause in the Court below, that said final judgment of the Court below be reversed by order of this Court without awarding costs to either party, without prejudice to the rights of any party hereto, and without passing upon the merits of said writ of error, and that this Court immediately remand this cause to the Court below with directions to the Court below to enter final judgment awarding relators in the Court below a peremptory writ of mandamus in accordance with the commands of the second amended alternative writ of mandamus heretofore issued in this cause and cancelling and discharging the supersedeas bond hereinabove referred to;

And said stipulation having been considered by the Court it is thereupon ordered by the Court that such stipulation be and it is hereby recognized by the Court and that the final judgment entered in the Court below be and it is hereby reversed, without awarding costs to either party, without prejudice to the rights of any party hereto, and without passing upon the merits of the said writ of error, and that this cause is hereby remanded to the Court below with directions to the Court below to enter final judgment awarding relators in the Court below a peremptory writ *317of mandamus in accordance with the commands of 'the second amended alternative writ of mandamus heretofore issued in this cause in the Court below and cancelling and discharging the supersedeas bond hereinabove referred to.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Brown,. J. J., concur.
Exhibit 32.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell/Graham Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                  
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                   
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                       
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: August 13, 2007