alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

In the Matter of: NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0620 

Served: September 16,2015 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

Complainant Federal Aviation Administration and Respondent National Power 

Corporation filed notices of appeal in this matter from the written initial decision issued by 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin on July 24, 2015. Under 14 C.P.R.§§ 13.233(c) 

and 13.211(e), parties must perfect their appeals by filing an appeal brief within 55 days of the 

date of the issuance of the initial decision. Accordingly, appeal briefs in this case are due no 

later than September 17, 2015. 

Complainant filed a motion on September 15, 2015, under 14 C.P.R. § 13.233(c)(2), 

seeking a 30-day extension oftime in which to file its appeal brief. Complainant represented 

that it has attempted to contact Respondent's attorney to obtain his consent to the request for the 

extension oftime. However, according to Complainant, Respondent's attorney has been away 

from his office and has not responded. Complainant wrote further in its motion that "the window 

to prepare the appeal brief was cut short when the case was transferred from our office in 

Chicago to headquarters for the appellate work," and that the headquarters attorney needs 

additional time to review the record, research the issues and prepare the brief. 

Complainant has shown good cause for its timely request for an extension of time. 

Complainant's request for an extension oftime in which to file its appeal brief is granted under 

14 C.P.R. § 13.233(c)(2). Complainant's appeal brief is now due by October 19, 20151 

Respondent filed its appeal brief on September 2, 2015. The due date for Complainant's 

reply brief is not extended by this order. Complainant may seek additional time in which to file 

its reply brief under 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.233(e)(1) or (2), if necessary. 

1 The "mailing rule" (14 C.F.R. § 13.2ll(e)), which provides additional time after service by mail, does 

not apply to this extension. Thus, it does not extend the appeal briefs due date beyond October 19,2015. 
MICHAELP. HUERTA 

ADMINISTRATOR 

2 Issued under authority delegated to the Chief Counsel and the Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation by 

Memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S.C. § 322(b) and 14 C.F.R. § 13.202 (see 57 Fed. 

Reg. 58,280 (1992)) and redelegated by the Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation to the Manager, 

Adjudication Branch, by Memorandum dated August 6, 1993.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Bonarablr daor@ R. Sheppard 

# Comptroller

of Publlo Aooountr Awtin, Trxae

In your lsttoc 0 our opfnlon ltlre~poneo to

and ownbr ovit agalnmt the suoh 

### noto and 8 l 8tloneonto **our*

an ardl~- y, 

### the state,

**the** 00unEy, ant rahool **di8triot,** in eat o? the lien a valid, 

### aeoessarl on17 in 

### oaao eaah had ax colleotor~’

a 

### transferand srrlgnnwat fws 8 

### Golleotorbe 

### rufrlolent tithout a far from the rtate 

### or any other tcpxingunit whilohmay hold taxer mga:ainst the prop

### erty?’ tt Artlole 7346a, Vernon’s Annota1ced Ul~ll 8tatutm, expro~~elyprovides that a pereon may pay asy 

## taxer due upon real property at the request of thr owner of sU0h pawporty and obtain a transfer of the tax lien. 8ueh statute authorlmr the 

## tax oolleotors of the Nate, oowtles mnd otherWnorabls f3sargoH. Sheppard, 

### Page 2

subdIvl6lons to rxsoute the transfer6 of 

### tu lIen6, and In Bsotlon 2 I6 found a form of oertlfioats of transisr whloh mar be ussd. It **16 nOt6d,**  however, that the **6tatUtO merely**  provid66 that the tax oolleotor61 

### csrtlfloats need only bs in "8ubstantIally" ths form provided. Answering your second and third quslrtione, it IO our oplnlon thst if the oounty tax oolleotor also aOt6 a6 rush for a oity, an Independent aohool dlstrlot and other **6ubdlvlslon6 h6**  **may** sxeouts a ssparats transfer for eaoh tulng body for whom hs aOt6, or he 

### may maks a Single lnetrument **suffioe for**  all of thorn. In ths latter event, howsvsr, 

### the cortlfloate must oontaln rubstantlally the slsasnto art forth In the pmsorlbed Sorm 

### a6 to saoh of the 

### taxing bodlss.. fRi8sertlfloate 

### should d66oribS the tu oollsotor a6 being thr oolleotor tor all of the 

### bodias for whom hm sots and 

### It should show the **name6 of**  the rer~ous tuIng unit6 whore lien6 he 1s transferring.

Ws are unable to answsr your first $rasrsl question as to whether the 

### taking of a doed of trust would waive the tax **lien.** Eaah 6a6e will lW6t on its OWCIfaots.
very trulr Tour6

(tlsnn **R. Lewis,**  AS6iSt~nt

APPROVEDMAR **21, 1941** 

**@+=----e-+---** ATTORNEY GEL!ERALOF TEXAS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5742]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


North American Free-Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 
Binational Panel Reviews

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Decision of Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 22, 2007, the binational panel issued its decision in 
the review of the final determination made by the International Trade 
Commission, respecting Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico Final 
Results of the Sunset Review, Secretariat File No. USA-MEX-2001-1904-
06. The binational panel affirmed the Commission's Sunset Review 
Determination. Copies of the panel decision are available from the U.S. 
Section of the NAFTA Secretariat.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caratina L. Alston, United States 
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade 
Agreement (``Agreement'') establishes a mechanism to replace domestic 
judicial review of the final determinations in antidumping and 
countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with 
review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel 
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national 
courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine 
whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of 
the country that made the determination.
    Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on 
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of 
Canada and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for 
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were 
published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686). 
The panel review in this matter has been conducted in accordance with 
these Rules.
    Panel Decision: The Panel affirmed the Commission's determination 
and instructed the Secretariat to issue a Notice of Final Panel Action 
at the appropriate time under the NAFTA Panel Rule 77(1).

    Dated: March 23, 2007.
Caratina L. Alston,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
 [FR Doc. E7-5742 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   I, Michael D. Bornak, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Portec Rail Products, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        May 12, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-957-07-1910-BJ-5GKW]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, Nebraska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of survey, Nebraska.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is scheduled to file the 
plats of survey of the lands described below thirty (30) calendar days 
from the date of this publication in the BLM Wyoming State Office, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of 
the Bureau of Indian Affairs and is necessary for the management of 
these lands. The lands surveyed are:
    The plats and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of 
portions of the Sixth Standard Parallel North, through Range 10 East, 
the east and west boundaries, the subdivisional lines, the subdivision 
of section lines, and the original 1867 meander line of the right bank 
of the Missouri River, the corrective dependent resurvey of portions of 
the Sixth Standard Parallel North, through Range 10 East, the 
subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of section lines, and the 
survey of the subdivision of certain sections, Township 24 North, Range 
10 East, of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Nebraska, was accepted March 
8, 2007.
    Copies of the preceding described plat and field notes are 
available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page.

    Dated: March 12, 2007.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.
[FR Doc. E7-4922 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4467-22-P
No. 56054.

protests 170551-K/2892, etc. (Chicago).

#### Continental Distributing Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION**

|   | 1. | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended                September 30, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03922**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 03922\03922_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03922\03922_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 03922\03922_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03922\03922_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03922\03922_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03922\Certification Statement Plant ID 03922.pdf Plant certification statement 03922\Supplemental Documents\03922_Map.JPG Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03922\Supplemental Documents\03922_WaterBalance.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
EXHIBIT 99(C)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-KSB of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Lamont Thomas, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.

 /s/ Lamont Thomas
---------------------------------------------------
Lamont Thomas

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Millar & Coe, Inc. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6309.

Entry No. 740980, etc.

Invoices dated Tunstall, England, January 21, 1942, etc.

Certified January 24, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 5, 1942, etc.

(Decided July 29, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman (Edward F. Jordan*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise consisting of earthenware and chinaware and the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*Suit No. 4513, C. A. D. 334, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the appraised value of the merchandise consisting of earthenware and chinaware involved in each of the cases enumerated in the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar eases, is equal to the price; at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> *274It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Eileen Dolgener v. Steven Dolgener

Appellate case number: 01-17-00490-CV

Trial court case number: 2008-49730

Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Eileen Dolgener, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s June 2, 

2017 order in a suit to modify the parent-child relationship. And, we abated the appeal 

pending resolution of modification proceedings in the trial court. Appellant has filed a 

motion, requesting that William M. Thursland be allowed to withdraw as her counsel and 

Katy Gardner be substituted as counsel on appeal. We reinstate the appeal on the 

Court’s active docket and grant the motion.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to note William Thursland’s withdrawal as 

counsel for appellant and substitute Katy Gardner as counsel for appellant on the docket 

of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __February 26, 2019___
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-923-1430-ET; COC-70704]


Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and Opportunity for Public Meeting; 
Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management published a document in the 
Federal Register of February 23, 2007, concerning a notice of proposed 
withdrawal. The document contained errors in the land description.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Senti, BLM Colorado State 
Office, 303-239-3713.
    In the Federal Register of February 23, 2007, in FR Doc. E7-3085, 
on page 8200, in the third column, make the following corrections to 
the land description:
    Sec. 4, the sixth and seventh lines should read ``a metes and 
bounds parcel within lot 1 and the NW\1/4\NW\1/4\;''
    Sec. 15, the ninth and tenth lines should read ``a metes and bounds 
parcel within the SW\1/4\SE\1/4\.''

Andrew J. Senti,
Acting Chief, Branch of Lands and Realty.
 [FR Doc. E7-6013 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 20, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-15-00842-CR No. 05-15-00843-CR No. 05-15-00844-CR

BRADLEY THOMAS CHANEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. MA13-13389-C, MA13-13390-C, MA13-13391-C



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill

Appellant has filed motions to dismiss the appe als. Appellant’s couns el has approved the

motions. The Court GRANTS the motions and ORDERS that the appeals be DISMISSED and

this decision be certified be low for observance. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47 150842F.U05

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRADLEY THOMAS CHANEY, Appellant

No. 05-15-00842-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. MA13-13389-C. Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers. and Whitehill.

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered July 20, 2015.

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRADLEY THOMAS CHANEY, Appellant

No. 05-15-00843-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MA13-13390-C. Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill.

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered July 20, 2015.

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRADLEY THOMAS CHANEY, Appellant

No. 05-15-00844-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MA13-13391-C. Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill.

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered July 20, 2015.