alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4922 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4922

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for 
transportation of individuals to and from facilities of the Department 
                          of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2024

  Mr. Ossoff introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for 
transportation of individuals to and from facilities of the Department 
                          of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Transportation Programs Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR TRANSPORTATION OF INDIVIDUALS TO AND 
              FROM FACILITIES OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 111A(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``September 30, 2024'' and inserting ``September 30, 2029''.
                                 <all>
```
# BATTERY LOGIt is critical that each battery is uniquely identified to track charge/discharge cycles and record cell voltage. This will a llow proper monitoring of

battery cycle count and cell voltages. GENERAL INFORMATION
KEEP THEM DRY

- As a general rule, water and electronics do not mix, and that usually applies to LiPo batteries.
AVOID OVER

- DISCHARGING LiPo packs should never be drained to nominal voltage. Draining the battery too far causes irreversible damage
INSPECT FOR DAMAGE

- LiPo packs should be regularly inspected for damage, as a small problem can result in a meltdown over time. A telltale sign of LiPo dam age is swollen or puffed

- up cells. This indicates irreversible damage and a potentially hazardous situation.
CHECK THE VOLTAGE MONTHLY

- Use a battery monitor to check its voltage. While LiPo batteries hold their charge well in storage, they do slowly lose voltage over time. When storing packs long term, check the voltage and capacity monthly.
STORAGE
STORE WITH 50

- 70% CHARGE

- LiPo packs should be stored with a partial charge. Check the battery’s instructions and determine the recommended voltage or capacity level for storage. Most manufacturers suggest storing LiPos between 50% and 70% charge capacity and voltage

. CHARGING Be absolutely sure that the Lithium Polymer charger settings are correct for the battery pack being charged

– both voltage and current settings. The lifetime of a LiPo battery is measured in charge cycles. The number of charge cycles that a LiPo can tolerate depends on several factors. Batteries will be taken out of services after 75

- 100 charge/discharge cycles depending on the cell voltage and cha rge retention.It is critical that each battery is uniquely identified to track charge/discharge cycles and record cell voltage. This will a llow proper monitoring of

battery cycle count and cell voltages. 

## Battery Log
No. 58639.

protest 229732-K (New York).

#### D. C. Andrews & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
\5~SOt

c2

1947 Galileo Ct., Suite 103 • Davis, California 95618 .,., __ (530) 757-3650• (800) 287-3650 • Fax (530) 757-3670

October23,2014

~‘ lANAG~~’

Andrew Steckel, Chief

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

SUBJECT: State Implementation Plan (SIP) Submittal Letter

Dear Mr. Steckel.

The Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District (District) previously submitted a request, through the

Air Resources Board (ARB) to have our Rule 2.31 (Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing) approved into the

SIP. As part of that request, we asked for Rule 2.13 (Organic Solvents), Rule 2.15 (Disposal and

Evaporation of Solvents), and Rule 2.24 (Solvent Cleaning Operations — Degreasing) to be rescinded.

Related to this request to rescind Rule 2.24, you have asked about the requirements in the former rule for

‘conveyorized degreasers’, as we did not copy them verbatim to the new Rule 2.31. The District did not

include the requirements in Rule 2.31 when it was revised in May of 2008 because we did not have any

conveyorized degreasers in our District. As stated on pages 9 and 10 of the staff report

(http://www.ysacirnd.org/documents/Solvent Rules Staff_Report.pdf):

“The District is proposing to delete Rule 2.24 from the District Rules and Regulations.

Requirements for batch cold cleaners, remote reservoir cleaners and gun washers will be

addressed in Rule 2.31. The District currently does not have any other degreaser permitted or

operating in the District. Any source proposing to operate a degreaser would require a Permit to

Operate and would be subject to Rule 3.4 -New Source Review.”

We reconfirmed through a review of our permits database and discussion with knowledgeable inspection

staff that there are currently no conveyorized degreasers and there are no sources planning to construct

one in the District. In addition, the old Rule 2.24 allowed operators to use any solvent, including those

with unlimited Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) content, in a conveyorized degreaser so long as the

equipment met certain requirements such as covers for entrances exits, safety devices, minimized

openings, and freeboard ratio. Under our revised Rule 2.31, if we did get a conveyorized degreaser, Rule

2.31 section 302.2 would require the operation to use solvents with a VOC content less than or equal to

25 grams/liter, since a conveyorized degreaser would not meet the requirements of Rule 2.31, section

302.2.b through 302.2.e. The District believes that the use of 25 g/L solvent is an equally effective

emission control compared to using a high VOC solvent with the specified controls of the old rule.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact Paul Hensleigh at

(530) 757-3650.

Sincerely,

Mat Ehrhardt, P.E.

Executive Director / Air Pollution Control Officer

f:\rules development sip since 5-99\2014 sip solvent rule supplemental.docx
#### The People of the State of New York, *Plaintiff, v.*The Albany Insurance Company, Defendant.

Judgment ordered for plaintiff for $2,812.50, and interest from January 15,1882, with costs. Opinion by Boardman, J.;

Learned, P. J., not acting.
FY2000 10K EX10.521






              EXHIBIT 10.521


Amendment No.1 to Stock Exchange Agreement with

Beijing Wisdom Network Technology Company, Ltd.

 


AMENDMENT No. 1

to

Agreement Concerning the Exchange of Common Stock

among

American Champion Entertainment, Inc. ("ACEI")

and

Beijing Wisdom Network Technology Company, Ltd. ("BA
Network")

and

The Shareholders of Beijing Wisdom Network Technology Company,
Ltd.

 

This Amendment is made by and between ACEI and BA Network concerning
amendments to certain paragraphs and clauses of the original agreement. Other
than the ones identified in this Amendment, all other clauses and the rights and
covenants of the parties shall remain unchanged.

Beginning with page 5, second paragraph:
WHEREAS, ACEI desires to acquire 80.00% of all of the issued and outstanding
shares of BA Network, in exchange for a total value of $4,672,050 of either ACEI
authorized but unissued shares of the common stock, $0.0001 par value (the
"Exchange Stock"), or partially in cash; and such Exchange Stock and cash, shall
be granted in three parts:


Clause I (in its entirety), and

Clause II (in its entirety), and

Clause III (in its entirety)

are to be deleted and replaced by:



WHEREAS, ACEI desires to acquire 80.00% of all of the issued and
outstanding shares of BA Network, with a cash payment of US$300,000.00 from ACEI
to BA Network which was already made on October 1, 2000, plus a payment of
800,000 shares of ACEI common stock. Such shares shall have registration rights
and ACEI shall include such shares in its next registration statement to be
filed with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission.

ACEI will use its best efforts to cause its subsidiary, BA Network, to be
separately listed on the OTC Bulletin Board within the first half of 2001. The
new listing of BA Network will be subjected to rules and regulations of the U.S.
Securities Act of 1933 that apply to "spin-offs." 

ACEI foresees the new ownership structure to be: i) the existing shareholders
of BA Networks to own 20% of the then listed company, ii) ACEI or its assigns to
own 20% to 40% of the then listed company, and iii) the balance to comprise of
shares in the public float. It is also contemplated that a round of the
financing to occur either simultaneously or shortly thereafter to the listing in
which case the ownership percentages to the parties will be diluted accordingly.





In addition, BA Network shall provide ACEI with approvals from its board
of directors and from its group of current 20% owners, within 2 weeks from the
date of executing this Amendment.

 

The above is inclusive of all changes effected by this Amendment and any
further alteration shall be approved in writing by the parties.



	
APPROVED
	
APPROVED

	

By: /s/ Anthony K. Chan

Anthony K. Chan

President & CEO

American Champion Entertainment, Inc.



Date: December 21, 2000

	

By: /s/ Lin Tao

Lin Tao
Director & General Manager

Beijing Wisdom Network Technology Company, Ltd.



Date: December 21, 2000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP04-98-002] 

Take notice that on January 5, 2007, Columbia Gulf Transmission Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following pro forma tariff sheets:

Second Revised Sheet No. 235

First Revised Sheet No. 236

Original Sheet No. 237

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

Magalie R. Salas, 

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-570 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00146

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022

- 000753

- 1
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr, Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion



### E RIKA 

### J OHNSON 

### , Appellant

V



### . S UNSET 

### P OINTE 

### H OUSING 

### P ARTNERSHIP 

### , L TD



### . , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant ’ s brief was due on August 19, 2 022. On September 9, 2022, we
notified A ppellant that her brief had not been filed as the Texas Rules of Ap pe llate
Procedure require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We warned that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless , within ten days, A ppellant filed a brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untim e liness

. See Te x. R. App. P. 10.5(b) (1) , 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). On the tenth day, we received a motion requesting an extension

. But the motion did not comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. 1 See Tex. R. App. P.
10.5 (b)(1). We notifi ed Appellant that her motion was noncompliant , we l ist ed out the non compliant aspects , and we warned that we could return the filing or deny the
motion unless Appellant corrected the deficiencies within ten days

. More than thirty days have passed since then

— and more than sixty day s h av e passed since the original deadline for Appellant ’ s brief

— but we have not received a response.
Because A ppellant has failed to file a brief , we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 3 8.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam
Delivered : November 3, 2022

1 Appellant ’ s motion lacked , among other things, a certificate of conference, a certificate of service, and a signature

. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5, 10.1(a)

.
Attachment 

PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM 

tiAN il'tZED
#### William Burns, *Respondent, v.*Sidney Dillon and others, *Appellants.*

— Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Macomber, J.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Christine Buchanan-McKenzie, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pristine Solutions Inc.
      for the year ended January 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Pristine Solutions Inc.                                                              

Dated: May 6, 2011

| | /s/ Christine Buchanan-McKenzie                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | Christine Buchanan-McKenzie                              
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial
| | Officer, Secretary and Director                          
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial  
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)                
| | Pristine Solutions Inc.                                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pristine
Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Pristine Solutions Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jack L. Kopnisky, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | Dated: November 9, 2007 |  | /s/JACK L. KOPNISKYJack L. Kopnisky Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Operating Officer
| | ----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The First Marblehead Corporation and will be retained by The First
Marblehead Corporation and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### Wilburn *v.*State.

In Banc.

Oct. 11, 1948.

(37 So. (2d) 12)

Hunter Garth & H. O. Stringer, for appellant.

*93George H. Ethridge, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Alexander, J.

Appellant was convicted under Code 1942, Section 2632, for having in his possession integral parts of a still. The only point reserved and argued on his appeal is that the defendant should have been awarded a directed verdict because the testimony showed without question that he possessed, if anything, a complete distillery.

 We stated in Black v. State, 199 Miss. 147, 24 So. (2d) 117, that an indictment for possessing a complete still and for possessing integral parts thereof was duplicitous.' They are separate offenses. Non constat, however, that one may not be tried and convicted upon a charge which is less than a completed offense. We are not confronted with a case where there is a conviction for a constituent element of an offense charged, but a conviction for constituent parts of a prescribed device. There is no election between offenses charged but rather as to what was to be charged.

*94The state may have proved more than was required. Of this the defendant may not complain, especially since such proof was relevant to the offense charged.

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonard Middleton, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 676]

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered November 18, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Defendant, an inmate at Hudson Correctional Facility in Columbia County, pleaded guilty to the crime of promoting prison contraband in the first degree after having been found with a razor blade in his possession. Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, he was sentenced as a predicate felon to a prison term of 2 to 4 years to run consecutive to his current sentence. Initially, we reject defendant’s contention that this criminal action is barred by double jeopardy. Although defendant was punished for the same offense as the result of a prior prison disciplinary proceeding, this does not bar a subsequent criminal conviction based upon the same conduct *(see, People v Frye,*144 AD2d 714, *Iv denied*73 NY2d 891). We further find, in view of the nature of the crime and defendant’s lengthy criminal record, that the sentence imposed is not excessive. We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
(LOGO) AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY

To Distribution List

Re: Officer's Certificate

Dear Sir/Madam:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year.

(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
    preceding fiscal year under the terms of the applicable Servicing Agreement,
    Trust  Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  and/or  Seller/Servicer
    Guide  and to the  best  of  this  Officers'  knowledge,  the  Servicer  has
    fulfilled all of its duties,  responsibilities  or  obligations  under these
    Agreements  throughout  such year, or if there has been a default or failure
    of  the  servicer  to  perform  any  of  such  duties,  responsibilities  or
    obligations,  a  description  of each  default or failure and the nature and
    status thereof has been reported as appropriate and is set forth below.

    Exceptions:


(B) The  Servicer  is  currently  an  approved  FNMA or FHLMC  servicer  in good
    standing;

(C) The Fidelity Bond and the Errors and  Omissions  Insurance  Policy  required
    under the terms of the  applicable  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust  Agreement,
    Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement  and/or  Seller/Service  Guide are in full
    force and effect and a copy of the related  declaration page evidencing such
    policy is enclosed herewith;


(D) All Custodial  Accounts have been reconciled in accordance with the terms of
    the applicable Servicing Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing
    Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide.



This  certification  covers the period of January 1, 1999  through  December 31,
1999.


AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY


By:    Elaine Stangl
Title: Executive Vice President,
       Loan Servicing


505 S. Main Street, Suite 6000, Orange, California 92868-4509  (714) 543-5262
No. 46205.

#### Protest 13465-K of Prodex Lit Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material in question.