alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
D

|  | **BOOKS** |
|--|-----------|
|  |
|  |

----

| **Links to other titles**
**Other Books**              - author              index- title              index

**CADRE Papers**              - author              index- title              index

**Fairchild Papers**              - author              index- title              index

**SAASS Theses**              - author index              - title index

**Maxwell Papers** *              - index

**Wright Flyer Papers** *             - index

* Available as downloads in PDF format only.

Distribution Policy**About this                title**They Served Here: Thirty-Three Maxwell MenJeffrey C. Benton
1999, 89 pages                ISBN: 1-58566-074-4                $7.50

order no. B-71 |  download

 

Colonel Benton provides a glimpse of the history of Maxwell                Air Force Base by highlighting the careers of 33 airmen who served at the base                at some point in their military careers. Some of the individuals portrayed were                pioneers in the development of airpower and provided military leadership from                World War II to the present. Others such as Glenn Miller, Clark Gable, and Bill                Stribling were notable for their accomplishments in other fields. The stories                told here highlight the critical, close interrelationships between the military                and local society.

Next Title | Previous                Title | AU Press Home

**What do you think**? E-mail your comments about this title to Air                University Press   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Susan Raynor and another, *as Administrators, etc., Appellants, v.*Samuel S. Carman, *Respondent.*

— Judgment reversed and new trial granted at Special Term, costs to abide event; order -of reference vacated. • Opinion by Barnard, P. J.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">LVOV Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Shantall Smith, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Mercury Casualty Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Kopelevich &amp; Feldsherova, P.C. (David Landfair of counsel), for appellant.Bruno, Gerbino &amp; Soriano, LLP (Nathan Shapiro of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Richard Montelione, J.), dated May 27, 2016. The order granted an unnoticed (see CPLR 2211) motion by defendant to dismiss the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that, on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the order is deemed to be an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (<i>see</i> CCA 1702 [a] [2]; [c]);and it is further,</p><p>ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint is denied.</p><p>After plaintiff, LVOV Acupuncture, P.C. (LVOV), commenced this action to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant, Mercury Casualty Co. (Mercury), brought a declaratory judgment action in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, against LVOV and its assignor herein, among others, seeking a declaration that, among other things, Mercury has no duty to provide coverage for claims arising out of the accident at issue. Although LVOV served an answer in the Supreme Court action, its assignor did not appear, and, as a result, Mercury moved in the Supreme Court, pursuant to CPLR 3215, for a default judgment against the assignor. In its order dated March 23, 2016, the Supreme Court noted that Mercury had <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>commenced an action for declaratory relief and that the assignor had failed to file an answer. Consequently, the Supreme Court granted the unopposed motion to enter a default judgment against the assignor. Shortly thereafter, Mercury moved in the Civil Court to dismiss the present complaint on the ground that, in view of the March 23, 2016 Supreme Court order, LVOV's action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. LVOV opposed Mercury's motion. LVOV appeals from an order of the Civil Court, dated May 27, 2016, which granted Mercury's motion. </p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Jamaica Wellness Med., P.C., as Assignee of Shantall Smith v Mercury Cas. Co.</i> (— Misc 3d &amp;mdash, 2018 NY Slip Op — [appeal No. 2016-2049 K C], decided herewith), the order is reversed and defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint is denied.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: July 13, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
## United States Standards for Beans *Source: 34 FR 7863, May 17, 1969, unless otherwise noted.*Effective November 10, 1997Terms Defined**101 Beans**
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14637-14638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5731]


Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act 2005: Comment Submission on 
2006 Report

    The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Oceans and International 
Environmental and Scientific Affairs is inviting interested groups and 
individuals to submit comments on the 2006 Report to Congress mandated 
by the ``Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act of 2005''. (The Report can 
be viewed or downloaded at http://www.state.gov/g/oes/water.) These 
comments, as part of the State Department's continuing outreach to the 
greater community of water stakeholders, will be incorporated into our 
evaluation of last year's report and will help build the base of our 
thinking on the 2007 report.
    The Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act of 2005 (HR 1973/PL-109-121) 
requires the Department of State with the U.S. Agency for International 
Development to develop and implement a strategy to further U.S. foreign 
assistance objectives to provide affordable and equitable access to 
safe water and sanitation in developing countries. The Act directs that 
the strategy be developed in consultation with ``other appropriate 
Federal departments and agencies, international organizations, 
international financial institutions, recipient governments, United 
States and international nongovernmental organizations, indigenous 
civil society and other appropriate entities.''
    Interested parties are invited to submit their written comments to 
Mr. Douglas McPherson, U.S. Department of State, OES/PCI Room 2726, 
2201 C

[[Page 14638]]

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520 or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#247374654750161414116457504550410a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="98cfc8d9fbecaaa8a8add8ebecf9ecfdb6fff7ee">[email protected]</span></a> 
no later than April 23, 2007. Submissions should be limited to 1500 
words.
    In addition to these comments, the Department of State, working 
with interested stakeholders, plans to have an event with experts to 
discuss key elements of the strategy.
    For further information, please contact Douglas McPherson at: 1-
866-501-7952 or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f1a6a1b09285c3c1c1c4b18285908594df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8cdbdccdeff8bebcbcb9ccfff8edf8e9a2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 21, 2007.
Claudia A. McMurray,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental 
and Scientific Affairs, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E7-5687 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 64232.

protest 59/24893 (New York).

#### Victory Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7210

ELIZABETH KNEWASSER,

Petitioner - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD PATTSULL, Judge, Honorable,

Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-98-426-R)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 21, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elizabeth Knewasser, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth Knewasser seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Knewasser v. Pattsull, No. CA-98-426-

R (W.D. Va. July 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Peng Mun Foo, Chief
Financial Officer of CHINA NEW ENERGY GROUP COMPANY (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY that:





1.      The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has executed this statement this 20th day of May, 2009.





/s/ Peng Mun FooPeng
      Mun FooChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China New Energy Group Company and will be retained by China New Energy Group
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OH N WI L L I AM DA L T ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 16069 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 9 - c v - 0 5 4 5 2 - SI ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S us a n I l l s t on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an d B Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. John W i l l i am D al t on , a f eder al pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct court ’ s orderdenyi ng hi s app l i ca t i on for l ea ve t o p roce ed i n form a pauperi s und er 28 U . S . C . § 1915( a ) , a nd s ubs e que ntj udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s a c t i on a l l e gi ng const i tut i on al vi ol at i on s ari si ng fr om an i nv es t i gat i on i nt o h i s c ri m i nal ac t i vi t i es 

# FI LED MA R 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 16069 2 and sub se qu entarre st . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew d e n o v o th e d e te rm in a tio n th a t ac o m p la in t la c k s a r g u ab le s u b s ta n c e in la w o rf a c t, a n d r e v ie w f

o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f le a v e to f

ile ac o m p la in t in f o rm ap au p e r is . T

ri p a t iv. Fi rst

N a t ’l B a n k & T

ru st , 82 1 F . 2d 13 68 , 13 69 (9th C i r. 1 9 8 7 ) . W e a f

f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g D a lto n ’s r e q u e s t to proceed i n form a pauperi s bec ause i tappears fr om the fa ce of the com pl ai ntthat th e act i o n i s H

ec k- b a rr e d . See H

ec k v . H um ph re y , 51 2 U . S . 47 7, 48 7 (19 94 ) ( an a c tio n f o rd a m a g e s is n o t c o g n iz ab le u n d e r4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 if “aju d g m e n t in f a vorof the pl a i nt i f

f w oul d ne c e s s a r i l yi m pl ythe i nva l i di tyof hi s c onvi c t i on or se nt ence . . . un l es s the pl ai nt i ff can d em on stra t e thatthe conv i ct i on or se nt ence h a s a lr e a d yb e e n in v a lid a te d ” ) ; s e e a ls o T r ip a ti , 82 1 F . 2d at13 70 (“ A di stri ctcourt m a yde nyl e a ve t o pr oc e e d i n f orm apaupe r i s a tthe out s e ti f i tappe a r s f

r om the fa ce of the prop osed com pl ai ntthatthe ac t i on i s f ri vo l ou s or w i tho utm er i t . ”) . D a lto n ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . W e i ns truc tthe c l e rk t o f i l e D a l t on’ s m ot i on t o r e c us e the di s tr i c tj udge , a nd d e n yth e m o tio n a s m o o t. AF F I RME D.
No. 54753.

#### Criterion Lamp & Shade Co. *v.*United States,

protest 151616-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
#### John H. Hintermister, *Plaintiff, v.*William F. Lane, *Defendant.*

— Motion for leave to go to Court of Appeals denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wntteb ~tate~ <!Court of §ppeaI~

for tbe jfeberaI <!Ctrcutt

ERIC M. SANDERS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HAROLD H. FLANDERS,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1394

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas in case no. 10-CV-0192, Judge

Lee Yeakel.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Susan S. Vance moves to withdraw as counsel of record for defendant-appellee, Harold H. Flanders.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. New counsel should promptly

file an entry of appearance.

Case: 12-1394 Document: 25 Page: 1 Filed: 11/07/2012
ERIC SANDERS V. HAROLD FLANDERS

821

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

2

Case: 12-1394 Document: 25 Page: 2 Filed: 11/07/2012
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 07, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 07, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0082. GLORIA MANCIA v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE 

BANK OF NEW YORK.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

161515
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Big  Flash   Corporation(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Edward F. Cowle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ Edward F. Cowle
---------------------------
Edward F. Cowle
Chief Executive Officer
April 14, 2005

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
Gina McCart j iy, Administrator .Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW washington, D. C. 

### 20460 Dear Ms. McCarthy: R^ -,^ m C ^ ^^ s-- — Y-- C - -^ , ..^ 

### ^r rn r C^
n ;- ---^ LO pF Uf W ^,,., na ^s^

cONr^nsN^^ ®A^ GLENN A. KOEPP SECRETARY STATE OF LOUISIANA



# THE SENATE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

P. O. BOX 94183 BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA 70804 PHONE (225) 342-5997 FAX(225)342-1140 KOEPPG@LEGIS.STATE.LA.US Ma y 27, 2014

Enclosed p

j ease find a cogrJ. of ,senate IReso j ution No. 151, which Ihave been instructed to forward to you. With &indest regards and be5t wishes, I am Sincere^

Ci j enn oepp* Secretar , y of the Senate GK/jw Enclosure

# .^

S-213 (R/83)

Regular Session, 2014 SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 151 BY SENATOR GALLOT



# O^ •L^Ul,^,. o ^ STr

. 

# •^ 0 0 ^°^-^^w ^1'FIDE11 

### ORIGINATED IN THE 

# SENATESR NO. 151 ENROLLEDWHEREAS, new systems, such as the Enlist Weed Contro! System, provide longD term sustainability through innovative educat?.orl and training programs, research and

^ development efforts, technology improvements acid. -M-f eld performance testing; and WHEREAS, Louisiana farmers need access to the newest innovative products in order to compete in the global marketplace. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the SPnate of the Legislature of Louisiana does hereby urge and request the Environmental Protection Agency and the United States Department of Agriculture to complete the approval process for certain new weed control system products. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be transmitted to the Environmental Protection Agency and the United States Department of Agriculture.

PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE

L Page 2 of 2

### LOUISIANA STATE SENATE P.O. BOX 94183 BATON ROUGE, LA 70804 TO:



### ^ Ciina McCarthy, Administrator

Environmenta 

### l Protection Agenc,g 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, D. C. 20460
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8382 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain combat 

zone compensation of certain servicemembers relating to remotely piloted 

aircraft from gross income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2024 

Mr. HORSFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

certain combat zone compensation of certain 

servicemembers relating to remotely piloted aircraft from 

gross income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Remotely Piloted Air5 craft Crews Tax Relief Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8382 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF COMBAT ZONE COMPENSATION EX2 CLUSION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 112 of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 is amended in subsections (a) and (b) 

5 by inserting ‘‘including the operation of a remotely piloted 

6 aircraft when such aircraft is in a combat zone and the 

7 provision of intelligence, targeting, or command and con8 trol that is certified by the Secretary of Defense to be in 

9 direct support of such operation,’’ after ‘‘served in a com10 bat zone,’’ both places such term appears. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply with respect to compensation re13 ceived in taxable years ending after the date of the enact14 ment of this section for periods of active service after such 

15 date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Before the Second Division,

June 30, 1938

No. 38934.

#### Protests 928334-G, etc., of Max H. Kahn et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Perservance Import Corp.*v. *United States*(T. D. 49290) the protests wrere sustained.
#### RAYMOND MAKSUTTA, *ETC.,*PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. LITTLE FERRY DRIVE-IN CORP., *ET ALS.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

*Mr. William V. Breslin; Messrs. Cole, Berman & Garth*and *Miss Paulette M. Lemay*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer; Mr. Alan E. Davis*and *Mr. Stanley L. Benn*for the respondent.

May 2, 1967.

Denied.
#### CHARLES VESTER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. COOPER ALLOY CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER.

*Messrs. Vaccaro & Osborne*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Freeman, Bass & Bregg*and *Messrs. Frohling & Gaullcin*for the respondent.

May 29, 1967.

Denied.