alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Big  Flash  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "34>Report"),  I,
Edward F. Cowle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   EDWARD F. COWLE
-----------------------------
Edward F. Cowle
Chief Executive Officer
April 14, 2006



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
#### James Devlin *v.*John Shannon.

— Motion denied. Mem. by Daniels, J.
No. 52701.

protests 612044-G, etc. (New York).

#### The National Freight Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

               Subsidiaries of Mediacom Communications Corporation

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       State of Incorporation or             Names under which
            Subsidiary                        Organization               subsidiary does business
            ----------                        ------------               ------------------------

<S>                                            <C>                  <C>
Mediacom LLC                                    New York            Mediacom LLC
Mediacom Arizona LLC                            Delaware            Medicom Arizona Cable Network LLC
Mediacom California LLC                         Delaware            Mediacom California LLC
Mediacom Capital Corporation                    New York            Mediacom Capital Corporation
Mediacom Delaware LLC                           Delaware            Mediacom Delaware LLC
                                                                    Maryland Mediacom Delaware LLC
Mediacom Illinois LLC                           Delaware            Mediacom Illinois LLC
Medicaom Indiana LLC                            Delaware            Mediacom Indiana LLC
Medicaom Minnesota LLC                          Delaware            Medicaom Minnesota LLC
Medicacom Southeast LLC                         Delaware            Medicacom Southeast LLC
Mediacom Wisconsin LLC                          Delaware            Mediacom Wisconsin LLC
Zylstra Communications Corporation             Minnesota            Zylstra Communications Corporation
Illini Cable Holding, Inc.                      Illinois            Illini Cable Holding, Inc.
Illini Cablevision of Illinois, Inc.            Illinois            Illini Cablevision of Illinois, Inc.
</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131275 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

ROGER E. COLE, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of Laura Kinney, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131275 

 COA: 268688 

Hillsdale CC: 05-000655-NH 

WILLIAM KEATING, M.D., 

 Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

HILLSDALE COMMUNITY HEALTH 

CENTER, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of September 26, 2006, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 

2006 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Washington v Sinai Hospital of Greater Detroit (Docket No. 130641). On order of the 

Court, the case having been decided on June 27, 2007, 478 Mich 412 (2007), the 

application is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Braverman 

v Garden City Hospital (Docket Nos. 134445-134446) is pending on appeal before this 

Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present 

application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE 

pending the decision in that case. 

l1010 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 17, 2007 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5733] 

## Notice of Public Meeting 

A meeting of the Advisory Committee on Democracy Promotion will be held on Monday, April 16, 2007, in Room 1107, U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and is expected to conclude at 1 p.m., and will be open to the public, up to the capacity of the meeting room. The Committee members will discuss various issues relating to strategies to promote democratic governance, with Secretary Rice participating from 10-10:45. 

Entry to the main State Department building is controlled and will require advance arrangements. Members of the public wishing to attend this meeting should, by Thursday, April 12, 2007, notify Karen Chen in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, telephone: 202-647-4648, of their name; date of birth; valid government-issued ID number (see below); citizenship; and professional affiliation, including address and telephone number in order to arrange admittance. This includes admittance for government employees as well as others. 

All attendees must use the “C” Street entrance of the Department, after being screened through the exterior screening facilities, and arrive at 9:30 a.m. to attend the Secretary's session. There will be no admittance after 9:50 a.m. until the completion of the Secretary's session. One of the following valid IDs will be required for admittance: any U.S. driver's license with photo, a passport, or a U.S. Government agency ID. Because an escort is required at all times, attendees should expect to remain in the meeting for the entire session. 

For more information, contact Paul Lettow, Senior Advisor to the Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 647-1189. 

Dated: March 23, 2007. 

Barry F. Lowenkron, 

Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Department of State. 

[FR Doc. E7-5807 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-18-P
## Breadcrumb

          -  Home 

# Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide

Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide -- HTML version

Data Central
Archive

Archive

**COMMISSION ON STRUCTURAL ALTERNATIVES FOR THE****FEDERAL COURTS OF APPEALS**
**Public Hearing in Atlanta, GA - March 23, 1998**
**Witness List (as of 3/18/98)** 9:00 a.m. -  Judge Joseph Hatchett, Chief Judge         U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit (TESTIMONY) 9:30 a.m. -  Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat, Former Chief Judge         U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit (TESTIMONY) 10:00 a.m. -  Emmet J. Bondurant                  Attorney at Law, Atlanta, GA        10:30 a.m. -  Charles E. Carpenter, Jr.         Attorney at Law, Columbia, SC  (TESTIMONY) 11:00 a.m. -  Deborah Barrow                  Attorney at Law, Atlanta, GA        11:30 a.m. -  Laurie Webb Daniel         Attorney at Law, Atlanta, GA  (TESTIMONY) 12:00 noon -  Judge John C. Godbold, Former Chief Judge (5th         & 11th Circuits)                  U.S. Court of appeals, 11th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-4070

___________

Peter Jon Simpson; Beverly Simpson, *

by and on behalf of themselves and *

Katherine Simpson, a minor, *

*

Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Glenda Harris; Mickie Dodds; Sharon *

Carr; Perry Epperly; Michael A. Carr; * [UNPUBLISHED] 

Holly Ryan; Doris Morgan; George *

Perrigo, Sgt.; John Doe, Unknown *

Deputy Sheriff #1; John Doe, Unknown *

Deputy Sheriff #2; Benno Steinmetz, *

M.D., Doctor; John R. Carlile, M.D., *

Doctor; Miss Fisher, Nurse; Lester E. *

Cox Medical Center, South; John Doe, *

Unknown Foster Care Person, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: October 7, 1999

 Filed: October 13, 1999

___________

Before LOKEN, MAGILL, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

-2-

Peter, Beverly, and Katherine Simpson appeal from the district court’s1 grant of

defendants’ motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The

court’s ruling was based on its finding that the Simpsons had continually and wilfully

disobeyed court orders, including this court’s order that:

Jon Peter Simpson and Beverly Simpson are hereby prohibited from

seeking any further relief in this court or in the United States District

Court for the District of Western Missouri until they provide satisfactory

proof that they and the juvenile K.A.S. have appeared before and

submitted to the jurisdiction of the Greene County, Missouri Juvenile

Court.

In re: Simpson, No. 94-2211 (8th Cir. Aug. 15, 1994) (unpublished order).

Having carefully reviewed the record, the parties’ submissions, and the nearly

eight-year history of this lawsuit, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err

in determining that the Simpsons had wilfully disregarded court orders, and did not

abuse its discretion in sanctioning their conduct through dismissal. See Rodgers v.

Curators of Univ. of Missouri, 135 F.3d 1216, 1219-20 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of

review).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven Vestergaard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Destiny Media Technologies, Inc. for the year
ended August 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Destiny
Media Technologies, Inc. (the Company)

| | By:    | /s/
      Steve Vestergaard
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | STEVEN VESTERGAARD         
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | November 29, 2011          



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 10934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
No. 64972.

#### The Coldwater Seafood Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 59/11900 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### The People of the State of New York, *Respondent, v.*Angelo Cometti, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Dye-maN, J.; Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Ableauctions.com, Inc. Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Abdul Ladha, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated October 23, 2009







/s/ Abdul Ladha


Abdul Ladha


Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer
---



Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements pertaining to The 2006 Amended and Restated Stock Option
Plan (Form S-8, No. 333-133552, May 18, 2007), and to the Amended 1999 Stock
Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-114904, April 27, 2004), of Destiny Media
Technologies Inc. of our report dated November 27, 2009 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Destiny Media Technologies Inc. for the
year ended August 31, 2009 included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended August 31, 2010.



CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Vancouver, Canada

November 29, 2010

---
#### LUCILLE GIANGRASSO, ET *AL., PL*AINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. DEAN FLOOR COVERING CO., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Messrs. Bchreiber <& Lancaster*and *Mr. Gerald W. Conway*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Beaman & Clark*and *Mr. Francis J. Lutz*for the respondents.

April 21, 1967.

Granted.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
November 20, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10414 Summary Calendar

TONY EDWARD POWELL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAVID MADDOX, MICHAEL HOUSE; CO II WILSON;

CO II HORN; BRANDON ATCHLEY

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:97-CV-00280

-------------------- Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Tony Edward Powell, former Texas inmate # 526334, appeals the

dismissal of his civi l rights complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§§ 19 15(e)(2) and 1915A for failure to state a claim for which

relief could be granted. Powell’s motion to amend his brief is

GRANTED.
Powell alleged that prison officials used excessive force on

him in an altercation that resu lted in his loss of good time2

credits, among other things. A prisoner attacking a disciplinary

proceeding that resulted in the loss of g ood-time credits cannot

bring a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action seeking damages until his

"conviction" in that proceeding has been expunged, reversed, or

otherwise set aside. E dwards v. Balisok
, 520 U.S. 641, 648 (1997);

Clarke v. Stalder
, 154 F.3d 186, 189 (5th Cir. 1998)(en banc).

Powell is unable to show that his disciplinary conviction has been

set aside. S ee Randell v. Johnson
, 227 F.3d 300, 301 (5th Cir.

2000).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Powell’s

motion for the appointmen t of counsel is DENIED. S ee Ulmer v.

Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982).
CEO CERTIFICATION


CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

I, Roger N. Smith, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OBN
Holdings, Inc.

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report.

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report.

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures as of the  end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.


Dated:  February 14, 2005

            By: /s/ Roger Neal Smith
                -------------------------
                    Roger Neal Smith
                    Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Christopher Naughton, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Marshall Edwards, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) ) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared:  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: February 6, 2007 /s/ CHRISTOPHERNAUGHTON Christopher Naughton    Chief Executive Officer  
37