alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Background:

A material whose composition was examined in #1409043 consisted of * reacted with a small amount of *. A question was posed as to *. This 

LC/MS analysis was performed with -------- in order to examine this question.

LC/MS method:

Solvent: A=*

Gradient: *

Flow rate: *

Column: *

Column temp: * °C

Inj vol: * μL

Ionization: *

Instrument: *

Sample preparation: *

* shows prominent molecular ions (probably [M+H]+) at m/z values of *, * and * (Fig. 1). These are *. GPC and LC/MS data suggest that *. The 

m/z values observed *. The fact that samples * suggests that *.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5510]



[[Page 14297]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 5, 2007, Roche 
Diagnostics Operations, Inc., Attn: Regulatory Compliance, 9115 Hague 
Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, made application by renewal to the 
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in 
schedule I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (7315)..........  I
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Alphamethadol (9605).......................  I
Phencyclidine (7471).......................  II
Ecgonine (9180)............................  II
Methadone (9250)...........................  II
Morphine (9300)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed 
controlled substances for use in diagnostic products.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail 
should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, 
Washington, DC 20537; or any being sent via express mail should be sent 
to DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/
ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must 
be filed no later than May 29, 2007.

     Dated: March 19, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-5510 Filed 3-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### City of Miami Beach, *et al.,*v. Sun Oil Company, a New Jersey corporation.

178 So. 109.

Division B.

Opinion Filed January 8, 1938.

*583/. *Harvey Robillard*and *Loftin, Stokes & Calkins,*for Appellants;

*Knight, Adair, Cooper ■& Osborne,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court denying a motion to dismiss appellee’s bill and granting a temporary injunction restraining the enforcement of an ordinance recently adopted by the appellant City of Miami Beach which in effect prohibits the bulk storage of gasoline and other petroleum products anywhere in the City of Miami Beach, North of the Government channel.

The interlocutory order appealed from will be and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of the decision this day made in the case of City of Miami Beach, *et al.,*v. The Texas Company.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

FEBRUARY 18, 2016 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b). 

1. Case No. SD33368 

 Re: JIMMY KENT RIGGINS, 

 Petitioner-Respondent, 

 v. 

 DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, 

 Respondent-Appellant.
!	


	





		
	 
!"


#
	
"	$#%"& 	'


	

	
	
(

	


	)

	
	


	





	

 	

	
	


%	



*	


 

	
( 

)
+	





	 

	
	


,	
	
		)





		

!!
"	
(-	
.
$#	."
,	/&' 

	
	


	

	

	

	
(


,	

	

	)"
	
0"

	$"
	0
"
	&
"


#
	
"		
	
 	
"	
(-	
.


111 

	



#
  	


	
	


	
	

	

	/
	
	


	


2	
		

	

	 	
	

	



 	



	
	



	(
		
 		
	
	
',		

	
(

	
	 	
	

)
	


'! 


	
	

		 )




!!"	

-
	3$#	"	
0	
 /&	 			



	
	



	
					


	



	
 	,	)
	

	 	
-
	

"	
3

!"
#
	
"		
	


			


	)

		


 *


	
	
		

	







		

	

		
	),		
	
			


	
 		

	


	
	 4566#%"7!,$4566859

:8;6&		
	



!"
#
	
"	
 	


		

	

	
-
	

	
	






			


 	<
.


"
	



$"


"

	&
<
.

	




 








=


'		


	

    		
    
	

	
 


 	



 P  
 	

 

 P
#### Stephen Van Rensselaer, Resp’t, *v.*John Jost Shafer, App’lt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department,*

*Filed February 4, 1890.)*

Ejectment—Presumption of satisfaction of judgment.

Where an action was brought to recover possession of a farm, for nonpayment of rent, under a manorial lease in perpetuity, and judgment was *472recovered in 1863, since which time nothing had ever been done by plaintiff under the judgment, and the defendant or his heirs had been in actual possession and occupation ever since, *Held,*that the judgment was presumed to be paid under Code Civ. Pro., § 376.

Appeal from order granting leave to issue a writ of possession.

*W.*Youmans, for app’lt; *W. S. Dyer*and *G. L.*Stedman, for resp’t.

Learned, P. J.

This case is similar to that of the same plaintiff against Wright A similar judgment was recovered in 1863. Shafer died in 1866. No execution was ever issued. Notice of application was served on children of Shafer and on occupants of the land. The judgment has been assigned to Church. No letters-of administration or testamentary have been issued on Shafer’s estate. He and his heirs have been in actual possession and occupation of the premises ever since the judgment. The application is made under Code, § 1376.

The decision in the other case controls this.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and motion denied.

Landon, J., concurs.

Pish, J.

The case is in every substantial particular like that of *Van Rensselaer*v. Wright; and the order in this case should be reversed on the same grounds as a similar order in that case is, reversed. The opinion in the *Wright*case governs this.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements.
Exhibit
23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We have
issued our report dated August 28, 2009 with respect to the financial statements
included in the Annual Report of Protalex, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
May 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report
in the Registration Statements of Protalex, Inc. on Form S-l (File No.
333-136098, effective August 15, 2007) and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-130998,
effective January 12, 2006; 333-130997, effective January 12, 2006; and
333-125919, effective June 17, 2005).





/s/Grant
Thornton LLP





Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania




August
28, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries

# AGENCY:

Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Executive Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries gives notice of a closed meeting of the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on April 19 and April 20, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Mercer Human Resource Consulting, 1166 Avenue of the Americas, 35th Floor, New York, NY. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patrick W. McDonough, Executive Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, 202-622-8225. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations will meet at Mercer Human Resource Consulting, 1166 Avenue of the Americas, 35th Floor, New York, NY on April 19 and April 20, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss topics and questions that may be recommended for inclusion on future Joint Board examinations in actuarial mathematics, pension law and methodology referred to in 29 U.S.C. 1242(a)(1)(B). 

A determination has been made as required by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that the subject of the meeting falls within the exception to the open meeting requirement set forth in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public interest requires that such meeting be closed to public participation. 

Dated: March 8, 2006. 

Patrick W. McDonough, 

Executive Director, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

 [FR Doc. E7-5854 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

ThisCompliance Certificate is furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the“Agreement”), dated as of May 13, 2010, by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2010-A, HyundaiCapital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”), Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation, as depositor, andCitibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1)        Iam a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.

 

2)        Areview of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the “Relevant Period”) andof the Servicer’s performance under the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)        Basedon such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Relevant Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed thisCompliance Certificate this 28th day of March, 2014.
#### Thomas H. O’Connor and another, *as Trustee, etc., Respondents, v.*James Carrigan and others, *Appellants.*

— Judgment affirmed, without costs. Opinion by Daniels, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 17, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 (toll-free), or 718-488-2085 (non toll-free).                               ( print page 13868)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, April 17, 2007 from 9 a.m. ET to 10 a.m. ET via a telephone conference call. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write Audrey Y. Jenkins, TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. Ms. Jenkins can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                 

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: March 15, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E7-5288 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this annual report of Transax International Limited
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stephen Walters, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Stephen Walters
-------------------
Stephen Walters
Chief Executive Officer
April 17, 2007
No. 52673.

protests 64767-K, etc. (New York).

#### The May Dept. Stores Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States (11*Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gryphon Gold Corporation, (the Company) does hereby
certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) that:

1.     The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2009

/s/ Michael Longinotti
Michael Longinotti 
Chief Financial Officer, Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
Before the Third Division,

August 5, 1941

No. 46232.

#### Protest 47149-K of H. A. Johnson Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the preserved ginger in question is composed in part of manufactured sugar but not in chief value thereof, the protest was sustained on the authority of Abstract 45762.
#### In the Matter of the Settlement of James Hughes’ Accounts as Administrator, etc.

— Decree of surrogate affirmed, with costs to be paid out of estate. Opinion by Dykman, J.
#### Patrick Murtagh *v.*John Conners.

— Motion to open default denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### The Central National Bank of the City of New York, *Apel*lant, *v.*David Valentine, *Respondent.*

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Brady, P. J.
EXHIBIT 4.14



                                    SCHEDULE

                   Information on six substantially identical
                       Consents and Agreements of Manager
                           dated as of March 23, 2001
                      in favor of First Union National Bank


       (Six additional documents are identical, except as set forth below,
                    to the document included as Exhibit 4.6)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                    Principal Amount
Apartment Property                              Borrower                                                     of Loan
------------------                              --------                                                     -------
<S>                                             <C>                                                        <C>
Harbour Club Apartments                         CRIT-VA II, Inc.                                           8,475,000
Virginia Beach, Virginia

Highland Hills Apartments                       CRIT-NC III, LLC                                          14,775,000
Carrboro, North Carolina

Canyon Hills                                    CAC II Limited Partnership                                12,675,000
Austin, Texas

Park Village                                    CAC II Limited Partnership                                 8,500,000
Bedford, Texas

Summertree                                      CAC II Limited Partnership                                 7,750,000
Dallas, Texas

The Courts on Pear Ridge                        CAC II Limited Partnership                                10,575,000
Dallas, Texas
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of DayStar Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Raja H. Venkatesh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to my knowledge, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date:November 14, 2007 

 

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to DayStar Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by DayStar Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8585 

To establish a National Auto Theft Bureau within the Department of Justice. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 31, 2024 

Mr. GOTTHEIMER (for himself and Mr. D’ESPOSITO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To establish a National Auto Theft Bureau within the 

Department of Justice. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Combatting Auto Rob5 bery at the Source Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL AUTO THEFT BU7 REAU. 

8 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Attorney General shall 

9 establish within the Department of Justice a National 

10 Auto Theft Bureau. 

11 (b) DUTIES.— The Bureau shall: 


ugoodwin on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8585 IH

1 (1) Act as a national repository for information 

2 related to auto theft, including by facilitating real 

3 time information sharing agreements between Fed4 eral, State, and local law enforcement agencies 

5 across the country who are combatting auto thefts. 

6 (2) Provide training, resources, and rec7 ommendations to private industry, the public, and 

8 law enforcement agencies on how to combat auto 

9 theft. 

10 (3) Establish a pilot program to provide to 

11 State and local law enforcement agencies to facili12 tate information collection, information sharing, and 

13 implementation of best practices related to auto 

14 theft. 

15 (c) PILOT PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION OF APPRO16 PRIATIONS.— There is authorized to be appropriated to 

17 the Attorney General to carry out the pilot program under 

18 subsection (b)(3) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2025. 

Æ 


ugoodwin on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Thomas J.
Hutchison III, Chief Executive Officer, certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, and its results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.



|                   |  |        |  |                            
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------
|                   |  |        |  | /s/ Thomas J. Hutchison III
|Date: May 11, 2005 |  | Name:  |  | Thomas J. Hutchison III    
|                   |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer