alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Summit Financial Services Group, Inc. (the Company), for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marshall T. Leeds, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Marshall T. Leeds               
|Marshall T. Leeds                   
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: August 19, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Summit Financial Services, Group, Inc. and will be retained by Summit Financial Services Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 41869.

#### Protest 237969-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of laces similar to those involved in *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 12.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F  of Rio Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Amended Annual Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The Amended Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the Amended Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date:  June 26, 2003





/s/ Alberto Lavandeira



Alberto Lavandeira

President and Chief Executive Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 29, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00072

- CR

David Cardenas , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 460TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIA NA AND SMITH MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment sig ned by the trial court on January 18, 2023. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment but that there was error requiring correction. Therefore, the Court

modifi es the judgment to remove the statement that Cardenas pleaded “not true” to the motion to

adjudicate and reflect instead that Cardenas made “no plea” to the motion to adjudicate. The

Court affirms the judgment as modified. Because appellant is indigent a nd unable to pay costs,

no adjudication of costs is made.
Opinion issued May 9, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-13-00142-CR

____________

DEANDRE ISAAC AUGUSTUS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1347346

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Deandre Isaac Augustus pleaded guilty to the felony offense of 

assault. The trial court found appellant guilty, and in accordance with the terms of 

appellant’s plea agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to confinement for 

two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 

Appellant has filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
2

In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial 

court’s permission to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be 

dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has 

not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. 

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea-bargain case and that the 

appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record 

supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss 

this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A 

court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who 

plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited 

appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8549 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8549

 To prohibit any person convicted of an unlawful activity on or after 
  October 7, 2023, on a college campus from being eligible for public 
                       service loan forgiveness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2024

  Mr. Ogles (for himself and Mr. Bilirakis) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit any person convicted of an unlawful activity on or after 
  October 7, 2023, on a college campus from being eligible for public 
                       service loan forgiveness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Loan Forgiveness for Hamas 
Supporters Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--Any person convicted of an unlawful activity on or 
after October 7, 2023, on a campus of an institution of higher 
education shall be ineligible for the public service loan forgiveness 
program under section 455(m) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 1087e(m)).
    (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``unlawful activity'' 
means--
            (1) an act of physical violence, as defined in section 5104 
        of title 40, United States Code; or
            (2) any other violation of State or Federal law.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 9200)

#### Baker Irons & Dockstader, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 851771.

(Decided July 29, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*504Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by and between the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court that the involved merchandise, invoiced as ACNA Naphthol E (AS-D) is a coal tar derivative dutiable under Paragraph 27, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

> That at the time of exportation thereof from Italy a product such or similar thereto was manufactured and sold in the United States at $1.75 per pound, less 1 %, net packed in accordance with the provisions of Section 402 (g), Tariff Act of 1930.

> That this case may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find the American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was $1.75 per pound, less 1 per centum, net packed. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCDP FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 1, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R.
Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 11, 2007



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. SproulsPresident (Principal Executive Officer)




28
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Rogers, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 470]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered April 18, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (four counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

CPL 240.45 (1) (a) requires that the People provide the defendant with "[a]ny written or recorded statement * * * made by a person whom the prosecutor intends to call as a witness at trial, and which relates to the subject matter of the witness’s testimony” *(see also, People v Rosario,*9 NY2d 286, *cert denied*368 US 866). Here, the complainant made no written or recorded statement that was not provided to the defendant. Accordingly, there was no *Rosario*violation.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved *for*appellate review *or*without merit. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
No. 53659.

protests 122503-K, etc. (New York).

#### Vintage Wine, Inc. *v.*United States,

*193Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Lancers Rose Wine in bottles or jugs similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 53224, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Cynthia A. Tolman, *as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v.*The Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

— Order affirmed on opinion of Mr. Justice Churchill at Special Term, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
EPA Hearing on Existing Power Plant Rule
My name is SisterFrances Murray and I am a Sister ofSaintFrancis ofPhiladelphia. I come today as a representative ofmy Congregation. I serve also as the Chair ofthe Congregation's Advocacy for Justice and Peace Committee. Icome as a Christian who believe that it is our moral duty to doing no harm to God's creation. In light ofthis, I entreat youto write Emission Guidelines for reducing carbon pollution from existing fossil fuel power plants that truly make a difference for global climate. Pope Francis said in his call to us, "Whenever human beings fail to live up to environmental responsibility, whenever we fail to care for creation and for ourbrothers and sisters, the way is opened to destruction and hearts are hardened. " Let us be protectors ofcreation." The tradition ofCatholic social teaching offers serious insights onenvironmental issues. We believe that the following themes drawn from the tradition are integral dimensions ofecological responsibility:

o A God-centered and sacramental view ofthe universe, which grounds human accountability for the fate ofthe earth;

o A consistent respect for human life which extends to respect for all creation;

o A world view affirming the ethical significance ofglobal interdependence and the common good;

o An ethics ofsolidarity promoting cooperation and ajust structure ofsharing inthe world community;

o An understanding ofthe universal purpose ofcreated things, which requires equitable use ofthe earth's resources;

o An optionfor the poor, which gives passion to the quest for an equitable and sustainable world;

o A conception ofauthentic development, which offers a direction for progress that respects human dignity and the limits ofmaterial growth. In Centesimus Annus, former Pope BenedictXVI insisted that the state has the task ofproviding "forthe defense and preservation ofcommon good such as the natural and human environments, which cannot be safeguarded simply by market forces." (#40) You can see that all ofthese principles apply to your decisions about writing emission rules for fossil fuel power plants. As you consider providing carbon limits on fossil fuel plants, which are the single largest source ofclimate pollution in the US and most often located in poor communities, I urge you to make sure that those limits truly do thejob ofreducing pollution and global climate change. Although we do our best to reduce our own carbon footprint, this pales in the presence of coal poweredplants. We know millions ofAmericansjoin us in supporting these limits. Please do the right and moral thing.

Frances Murray, OSF Sisters ofSt. Francis ofPhiladelphia 160 MeadowbrookLane Brookhaven, PA 19015 mirmurray@comcast.net
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 I, John N. Pesarsick, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Portec Rail Products, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 August 14, 2006
    
    /s/ John N. PesarsickDate
    
    John N. PesarsickChief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 1

Date: September 28, 2012

MEMORANDUM

TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0542

SUBJECT: Meeting with The International Council on Clean Transportation

On September 28, 2012, representatives from The International Council on Clean 

Transportation (ICCT) met with EPA to discuss renewable fuels produced from palm oil. Mr. 

Chris Malins highlighted several issues discussed in ICCT’s comments (slides attached to this 

docket entry), including peat soil emissions related to palm oil expansion and palm oil yields. 

This was followed by a discussion about data sources and other technical issues.

List of Representatives The ICCT

1. Mr. Chris Malins

2. Ms. Stephanie Searle

List of Representatives from EPA

Aaron Levy Program Analyst, Transportation and Climate Division (TCD)

Angela Dickens AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellow, TCD
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The FirstMarblehead Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Daniel Maxwell Meyers, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: February 11, 2005 |                                                                      |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | /s/ Daniel Maxwell Meyers                                                 |   |
|                     | Daniel Maxwell Meyers                                                     |
|                     | Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to The First Marblehead Corporation and willbe retained by The First Marblehead Corporation and furnished to the SEC or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
|                                                                            |        |              |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| Name                                                                       |   | Jurisdiction |
| Medley Small Business Fund, LP (formerly known as Medley SBIC, LP)         |   | Delaware     |
| Medley Small Business Fund GP, LLC (formerly known as Medley SBIC GP, LLC) |   | Delaware     |
| Medley SLF Funding I LLC                                                   |   | Delaware     |
| MCC Investment Holdings LLC                                                |   | Delaware     |
| MCC Investment Holdings AAR LLC                                            |   | Delaware     |
| MCC Investment Holdings AmveStar LLC                                       |   | Delaware     |
| MCC Investment Holdings Omnivere LLC                                       |   | Delaware     |
| MCC Investment Holdings Sendero LLC                                        |   | Delaware     |
#### Commonwealth *v.*Smulek, Appellant.

Submitted January 6, 1969.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*560April 23, 1969:

*Carl J. Smulek,*appellant, in propria persona.

*James E. O’Brien,*Assistant District Attorney, and *Joseph J. Cimino,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed.

Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2010-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015