alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14-0067 

Focus Ready Draft 12/2/2013

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ EV 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SAT (concerns) (11/15/2013):

Analogs: .

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

Migration to groundwater: PMN moderate; Deg Pdt rapid 

PBT rating: P3B2T1 P3B1 (PMN); P3B2 (Degradation Pdt)

Health: 2 Drinking Water, No exposures needed for PMN; Drinking Water 

for Degrad Prd 

Eco: 1 No releases to water 
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14-0067 

Manufacturing

3M Cottage Grove Cottage Grove MN 55016

3M Decatur Decatur AL 35609

Number of Sites/ Location: 2 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14-0067 

Processing: 

Clariant Corporation - New Hope, MN 55429 

Standridge Color Corporation - Social Circle, GA 30025 

PolyOne Corporation - Suwanee, GA 30024 

Polyvel - Hammonton, NJ 08037 

Number of Sites/ Location: 4 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14-0067 

Use: 

Providencia USA, Inc. - Statesville, NC 28625 

PGI Nonwovens - Mooresville, NC 28115 

Kimberly-Clark - Roswell, GA 30076 

Number of Sites/ Location: 3
#### TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL, IN THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

On petition for certification to Appellate Division, Superior Court.

See same case below: 99 *N. J. Super.*11.

*Mr. Robert V. Garton*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Arthur J. Sills*and *Mr. Charles H. Landesman*for the respondents.

March 26, 1968.

Denied.
#### Edward P. Stuart, *as Trustee, etc., Respondent, v.*Thomas J. Patterson and others, *Appellants.*

— Orders appealed- from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in one case.
No. 44099.

#### Protest 926734-G, etc., of Jute Importers, Inc., et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

94) ll-E-54 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:06 AM Sheet 94 of 264 
EMSIG-HUDSON 

12 03.96 15;26 

TEL: 1-518-828-0026 Dec 04.96 

©19190410234 PES RTP NC 

10:10 No.001 P.01 

@oo2.ou2 A-94-52 

P.2 

Jtt-E-54 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

Contact Report 

Melanie Proctor, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

November 6,1996 

Mr. Timothy Haskins. Director of Regulatory Affairs 

Emsig Manufacturing Corporation 

Telephone Number: (518) 828-7301 

Fax Number: (518) 828-0026 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Haskins was contacted to determine if Emsig Manufacturing Corporation is 

considered a major source. Mr. Httskms explained that the State of New York does not consider 

Kmsi£ to be a major source and does not require them to obtain a Title V permit. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John A. Scarlett, M.D., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Tercica, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tercica, Inc.



Date: November 12, 2004



By:

/s/ John A. Scarlett, M.D.John A. Scarlett, M.D.Chief Executive Officer




This certification accompanies
the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Tercica, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Campus Crest Communities, Inc.
  /s/    Ted W. RollinsTed W. RollinsCo-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/    Donald L. Bobbitt, Jr.Donald L. Bobbitt, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John A. Scarlett, M.D., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tercica, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 13,2004
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-576]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP07-15-001]


Central New York Oil and Gas Company, LLC; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

January 10, 2007.
    Take notice that, on December 29, 2006, Central New York Oil And 
Gas Company, LLC (CNYOG), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, to become 
effective February 1, 2007:

Third Revised Sheet No. 2
Second Revised Sheet No. 4
Second Revised Sheet No. 5
Second Revised Sheet No. 12
Original Sheet No. 12A
Second Revised Sheet No. 13
Second Revised Sheet No. 22
Second Revised Sheet No. 26
Second Revised Sheet No. 31
Second Revised Sheet No. 32
Second Revised Sheet No. 33
Second Revised Sheet No. 73
Second Revised Sheet No. 74
Second Revised Sheet No. 76
Third Revised Sheet No. 122
Third Revised Sheet No. 134
First Revised Sheet No. 140

    CNYOG states that the filing is being made to comply with the terms 
of the Commission's order of December 21, 2006 in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a 
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e282b3c2d21000207000b3d1b1e1e011c1a2e080b1c0d40090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bcdced9c8c4e5e7e2e5eed8fefbfbe4f9ffcbedeef9e8a5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 26, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-576 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Riley Stevens, *Respondent, v.*Sarah Bushfield and others, *Appellants*

— Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Macombee, J.
Exhibit32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Alamosa (Delaware), Inc. (the"Company") for the fiscal year ended December31, 2004, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, David E.Sharbutt, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ David E.Sharbutt

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Name:     DavidE. Sharbutt Title:       Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer Date:       March 24,2005

This certification accompanies the Report pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, exceptto the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
Exhibit 23



To the Board of Directors

Ableauctions.com, Inc. and Subsidiaries







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of Ableauctions.com, Inc. and subsidiaries, which were filed with the Commission as numbers 333-117979, 333-114906, 333-32740, 333106102, 333-106101, 333-106005, 333-87800 and 333-32740, of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms Report dated March 18, 2005 except as to Note 3, which is as of March 30, 2006, covering the consolidated financial statements of Ableauctions.com, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004.







/s/ Cinnamon Jang Willoughby & Company



CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS



Burnaby, BC

April 5, 2006
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIRD DISTRICT , AT AUST IN NO. 03-00-00698-CR Dayne J ohn Kline, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE

DISTRICT CO URT OF CALDWELL CO UNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2000-038, HONORAB LE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from an order revoking community super vision. Sentence was imposed on August 31, 2000. The deadline for fil ing a motion for new tr ial or per fecting appeal was therefor e Ocotber 1. See Tex. R. App. P. 21. 4(a), 26. 2(a)(1 ). B oth a motion for new tr ial and notice of appeal were filedon October 12. No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 26. 3. We lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purpor ted appealin any manner other thanby dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slato n v. State , 981 S. W. 2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) ; Olivo v. State , 918 S. W. 2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Cri m. App. 1996) .2 The appeal is dismissed. B efore Justices Kidd, B . A. Smith and Puryear Dismissed for Want of Jur isdiction F iled: F ebruar y 15, 2001 Do N ot Pu blish
Docket No: FAA-2015-2461 Dir ID: 2013-NM-202-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 10/15/13

Regional Airline Association 10/15/13

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 10/15/13

ATA M Lopez 10/15/13
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2017

N o. 04

- 17

- 00026

- CV

Michele R. PAULI

Appellant (Cross

- Appellee)

v.

Michael D. HAYES and Teresa C. Hayes

Appellee s (Cross

- Appellants)

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar Cou nty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 12272

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to October 30, 2017.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_______________ ___________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

C lerk of Court

cc: Beth Watkins

Watkins Appeals, PLLC

926 Chulie Drive

San Antonio, TX 78216

- 6522

Lorien Whyte

Pozza & Whyte, PLLC

239 E. Commerce Street

San Antonio, TX 78205

Roger G. Bresnahan

Farrimond Castillo & Bresnahan, P.C.

130 E. Travis, Suite 350

San Antonio, TX 78205 David L. Earl

Earl & Associates, P.C.

Pyramid Building

601 NW Loop 410, Suite 390

San Antonio, TX 78216

Grant Gaines

Patel Gaines, PLLC

14414 Blanco Road, Suite 320

San Antonio, TX 78216
No. 48,079

#### Charles A. Satterfield, *Appellant,*v. Laura Jean Satterfield, *Appellee.*

(558 P. 2d 108)

Opinion filed December 11, 1976.

*Robert L. Feldt,*of Great Bend, argued the cause, and was on the brief for the appellant.

*John M. Russell,*of Great Bend, argued the cause, and was on the brief for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

Charles A. Satterfield appeals from an order denying his second successive motion under K. S. A. 60-260 *(b)*for relief from portions of a divorce decree fixing paternity and requiring child support payments.

Charles commenced this action by filing a verified petition for divorce. He alleged that the parties had two children. The trial court granted him a divorce from Laura Jean Satterfield on April 24r 1974. The decree granted Laura the custody of the parties’ two minor children, required Charles- to support the children, and made other provisions for them.

Charles filed a motion under K. S. A. 60-260 *( b )*on February 28, 1975. He alleged that since the granting of the divorce he discovered that he was not the father of one of the children. He alleged fraud, concealment and misrepresentation by Laura, and sought appropriate relief. The motion was argued and briefs were submitted by counsel. By written order filed May 23, 1975, the trial court denied the motion. No appeal was taken.

Charles then made a second and similar motion orally, and it was denied on July 25,1975. Charles appeals.

The ruling of a district court on a motion for relief from a final judgment on the grounds of mistake, newly discovered evidence or *16fraud, brought under K. S. A. 60-260 (fo), becomes final if no appeal is taken within thirty days. A second or successive motion on the same grounds is thereafter barred by the doctrine of *res judicata. Taber v. Taber,*213 Kan. 453, 516 P. 2d 987.

The ruling of May 23 became final and binding upon the parties in thirty days when no appeal was taken. K. S. A. 60-2103. We cannot now review the merits of that order. The second successive motion made on July 25 presented only matters which were *res judicata,*and the trial court properly overruled it.

For the reasons set forth above and fully discussed in *Taber,*supra, the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coast Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Anne V. Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Anne V. Lee                      
|                     |  |     |  | Anne V. Lee,                         
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8448 

To establish a pilot program to establish a pre-approval process for direct 

farm ownership loans made under subtitle A of the Consolidated Farm 

and Rural Development Act in order to streamline the application process 

and provide greater certainty to borrowers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2024 

Mr. BACON (for himself and Mr. NUNN of Iowa) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To establish a pilot program to establish a pre-approval 

process for direct farm ownership loans made under subtitle A of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development 

Act in order to streamline the application process and 

provide greater certainty to borrowers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support for Ownership 

5 and Investment in Land Act’’ or the ‘‘SOIL Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8448 IH

1 SEC. 2. FARMER LOAN PILOT PROJECTS. 

2 Subtitle D of the Consolidated Farm and Rural De3 velopment Act is amended by inserting after section 333D 

4 (7 U.S.C. 1983d) the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 333E. PRIOR APPROVAL AUTHORIZATION PILOT PRO6 GRAM. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, acting through 

8 the Administrator of the Farm Service Agency, shall carry 

9 out a pilot program to establish a pre-approval process 

10 for direct farm ownership loans made under subtitle A in 

11 order to streamline the application process and provide 

12 greater certainty to borrowers. 

13 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.— 

14 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

15 provision of this Act, the Secretary may establish eli16 gibility requirements for direct farm ownership loans 

17 under subtitle A. 

18 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—This section shall not be in19 terpreted to repeal any borrowing requirement im20 posed under subtitle A. 

21 ‘‘(c) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

22 of enactment of this section, and annually thereafter, the 

23 Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Agriculture 

24 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

25 Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate a reVerDate Sep 11 2014 15:29 Jun 29, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8448.IH H8448

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8448 IH

1 port examining the actions undertaken under, and the re2 sults of, the pilot program. 

3 ‘‘(d) TERMINATION OF EFFECTIVENESS.—The au4 thority provided by this section shall terminate effective 

5 September 30, 2029.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
James V. O'Toole 

City 

August 20, 2014 

Kevin Schlemmer 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, D.C 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

: .,). 

· .. · .... , 

The City of Escanaba joins the Delta County Airport Board and the Delta County Board of 

Commissioners in their support of the bid fi:om Sky'.>vest Airlines. 

Skywest Airlines proposal offers the same service our regional airport is currently receiving, and 

their code share package with Delta Airlines will maintain the consistency and continuity needed 

to increase the already established :Jiequent flyer loyalty in our conununity. The airport's current 

bank of time schedule is a key part to the increase of enplanement numbers, and maintaining a 

familiar service will allow for these numbers to continue growing. 

Fmihermore, Delta Airlines partners have shown a consistent high degree of customer service for 

our community and visitors. Their reliable schedule provides quick access to Detroit's Network 

of world connections necessary to assist our community in creating global economic 

opportunities. 

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 

Sincerely, 

- James V. O'Toole 

City Manager 

jotoole@escanaba.org 

(906) 786-9402 

Enhancing tl1e to our citizens.