alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Steven
H. Kane, Chief Executive Officer of Protalex, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby
certify pursuant to Rule 13a-l4(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
that:





(1) the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009 (the
"Report"), to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Dated:
      August 28, 2009
                  By: /s/ Steven H. KaneSteven
      H. KanePresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and
Director
Exhibit 35.2



|     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                          
|---- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045

Citibank N.A.

17g-5 Information
Provider

ratingagencynotice@citi.com

RE: Annual Statement
as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), as Trustee and Paying
Agent1, hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period):

(a) a review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement
listed on Schedule A hereto (the Servicing Agreement) has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period, except as described on Schedule B hereto.

February 27, 2014



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
|Kristen Ann Cronin    
|Vice President        
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.



|1 | Effective January 1, 2014, the Pooling Agreement was amended and restated to, among other things, appoint Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent. See the Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2014
for additional information.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |      | 
|---------------------- |  |  | ---- | 
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  |  | LOGO | 



---

Schedule A

Pooling Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2010, for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2010-H1 by and between Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc., as Depositor, and
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.2



|2 | The parties entered into an Amended and Restated Pooling Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2014, by and among Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee, and Citibank, N.A.,
as Securities Administrator. See the Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2014 for additional information.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2



---

Schedule B

None.



3
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3323

_____________________________

SAM STROTHER,

Appellant,

v.

JULIA MCCALL, Coordinator, 

Office of Executive Clemency,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

John C. Cooper, Judge.

April 13, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Sam Strother, pro se, Appellant.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender 

Review, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 99.8



Consent of Independent Auditor



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended June 30, 2016 of DHX
Media Ltd. of our report dated September 28, 2016, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appear in the Exhibit
99.2 incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.



We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form F-10, as amended (No. 333-205210) and Forms S-8 (No. 333-208591 and No. 333-207194) of DHX Media
Ltd. of our report dated September 28, 2016 referred to above. We also consent to reference to us under the
heading “Interests of Experts,” which appears in the Annual Information Form included in the Exhibit 99.1, which
is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F, which is incorporated by reference in such
Registration Statements.



|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     | 
|---------------------------------- | 
|                                   | 
|Chartered Professional Accountants | 
|Halifax, Nova Scotia               | 
|                                   | 
|September 28, 2016                 |
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 27, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tracey L. Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: October 20, 2009





By:

/s/ Tracey L. StockwellTracey L. Stockwell
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of DayStar Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), I, Stephen A. Aanderud, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 14, 2005



/s/ Stephen A. AanderudStephen A. Aanderud Chief Financial Officer




This Certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DayStar Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by DayStar Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Lawrence Fallon, *Respondent, v.*The Board of Police Commissioners of the City of New York, *Appellants.*

Order reversed, with costs. Opinion by Davis, P. J.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24

- 1060

In re: JOHNNY ELIAS GONZALEZ, a/k/a Solo , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte . ( 3:08

- cr - 00134

- RJC

- SCR

- 18 )

Submitted : July 25, 2024 Decided: July 29, 2024

Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and QUATTELBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Johnny Elias Gonzalez , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1060 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Johnny Elias Gonzalez petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for compassionate release

. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s
docket reveals that the district court recently denied the motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this co urt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 24-1060 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/29/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Apropos Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

|/s/ KEVIN G. KERNSKevin G. Kerns, Chief Executive Officer and President              |  |  |  |               
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------
|/s/ FRANCIS J. LEONARDFrancis J. Leonard, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President |  |  |  |               
|                                                                                     |  |  |  | March 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the
Form 10-K.

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Marc L. Rose, Chief Financial Officer of Protalex, Inc. (the "Registrant"),
do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code that:

(1) the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31,
2005 (the "Report"), to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Dated: August 26, 2005                  By: /s/ Marc L. Rose
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Marc L. Rose
                                            Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certificationpursuant to Section 302of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Michael Carlson, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of AES Ironwood, L.L.C.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date:  March 30, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Michael  Carlson |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | By:                  | Michael Carlson |
|   | Title:               | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
(Reap. Dec. 8594)

#### Fownes Bros. & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 713326; 715396.

(Decided June 15, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell*<fc *Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated above consists of wool glove liners.

*610IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the export values at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including the costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States are the appraised values. There was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved merchandise, and that such values were the appraised values.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
NO. 07-15-00079-CR

KENYA ABDULE MARTIN § IN THE SEVENTH COURT

§

v. §

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS § OF APPEALS OF TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW Kenya Abdule Martin, appellant, and files this Motion to 

extend the time to file his Brief until September 28, 2015.

I.

The appellant’s Brief is due on September 21, 2015. Two prior extensions

have been sought and granted. Undersigned counsel is aware that his previous 

motion, filed September 7, 2015, stated it would be his final one in this case; 

counsel sincerely apologizes for filing yet another motion.

After counsel filed the second motion, however, a court reporter present at a 

pretrial hearing – not the reporter who transcribed the trial – filed a supplemental 

volume to the reporters record on September 8, 2015. In addition, this appeal is a 

complicated one with several issues to be researched and raised. In light of all this, 

undersigned counsel requests the Court’s indulgence for one further week to

properly prepare the appellant’s Opening Brief.

ACCEPTED

07-15-00079-CR

SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

AMARILLO, TEXAS

9/21/2015 10:44:32 PM

Vivian Long, Clerk

 FILED IN 7th COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 9/21/2015 10:44:32 PM VIVIAN LONG CLERK
2

II.

Undersigned counsel further represents the following clients whose briefs or 

other appellate pleadings were filed on the indicated dates in the 30 days preceding

the filing of this motion, and has not yet had time to prepare the brief in this case:

Denton v. State, 07-15-181/2-CR – Opening Brief filed 8/27/15

Benefield v. State, 02-14-00099-CR – PDR filed 8/28/15

Finch v. State, 07-15-104-CR – Reply Brief filed 9/3/15

French v. State, 11-14-284-CR – Reply Brief filed 9/3/15

Counsel also represented a prisoner in a parole revocation case in the second week in 

September, in Randall County.

WHEREFORE, the appellant prays the Court grant an extension of time to 

file the Appellant’s Brief to September 28, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ JOHN BENNETT

John Bennett

Post Office Box 19144

Amarillo, Texas 79114

(806) 282-4455

Fax: (806) 398-1988

State Bar Number 00785691

Email: AppealsAttorney@gmail.com

Attorney for the appellant
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above Motion was served 

by email on September 21, 2015, on Jack Owen, Esq., Assistant District Attorney 

for Potter County, to him at jackowen@co.potter.tx.us.

/s/ JOHN BENNETT

John Bennett
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

PEAYATTA J. GIRVEN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3478

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed October 11, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward 

and Christopher C. Nash, Judges.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Ama N. Appiah, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
AFS

- 13

- 240

- E March 19, 2013

Exemption No. 10725 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 13

- 0184

Mr. Jeffrey S. Gruber Associate Professor/Program Coordinator Columbus State Community College

5355 Alkire Road Columbus, OH 43228

Dear M r. Gruber :

This letter is to inform you t hat we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 19, 2013 , you pe titioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Columbus State Community College (CSCC) for an exemption from § 65

. 75 (a) of

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

. This exemption, if granted, would permit

CSCC to administer the a vi ation m echanic g eneral (AMG) written test to students immediately following successful completion of the general curriculum, prior to meeting the experience requirements of 14 CFR § 65.77.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in

the Federal Register . T he requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Metro Technology

.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petiti on. In Grant of Exemption No

. 6569 (cop y enclosed), the FAA found that testing immediately after learning was a universally accepted instructional principle that reinforces learning.

Therefore, we allo wed the petitioner to test students immediately after successfully completing the general curriculum but before meeting the requirements of § 65.77.2

AFS

- 13

- 240

- E Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they do no t differ materially f rom those presented by the petitioners in the enclosed grants of exemption;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for gr anting the enclosed exemptions also apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Und er the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Columbus State Community College an exemption from

14 CFR § 65

. 75 (a) to the extent necessary to :

Administer the AMG written test to st udents immediately following successful completion of the general curriculum, before meeting the experience requirements of § 65.77.

Conditions and Limitations

Before exercising the privileges of this exemption, Columbus State Community College must prov ide its o perations h andbook to its c ertificate h olding d istrict

o ffice (CHDO) and receive approval of the o perations h andbook from the

CHDO.

T his exemption terminates on April 30 , 201 5 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosures