alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10949 Conference Calendar

WILLIE ED CRAFT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DAVID EDGEWORTH, Medical Doctor; DAVID WILLIAMS, Sheriff; TARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CV-465-A

- - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Willie Ed Craft, #0028433, appeals from the district court’s dismissal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) of his civil rights complaint. Craft contends that he stated a valid claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have reviewed the record and Craft’s brief and conclude that his appeal is frivolous. We caution Craft that any additionalNo. 96-10949 - 2 - frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Craft is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. Craft’s motions for copies of his medical records and for return of his copy of his appellate brief are DENIED.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
# II lit*I £> J^?/?;c^ Gjl-t^yg^i

_^2^.(p.l Gh ^o=^\



## 7^n/ie,"vW; /k^/|^>T7^f^ Sto< 0TM/l\- o^Pj;-^-,nr4 ApJtoz{< 

## ^L^3^ flSCEIVED IN OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

### j^f.Vn-Tx 7<fT/|

^. 

### ' ^tf(.f.-./110 <?#?;? '.find LW PM&K, tlwn k)ifr4fa* An•• fejaAsn'ML.b -fe Afr/|gg

_ -f^edfAAK^i-ofh^ dtT&fi'ti G^V -•^m Ot/vte/lAeJ: -fe '-£&$-!an L>\/ fc.W af^ 4/]ni'on jo 

### 0^- CP3i© ^rf)' iCfrvr flMfn^f 

### ' -'<p. anj JbQl mt^r^n ,v\-fc>. (hf&Jfi(A M j>^/6e£r QbcM;..
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*John Sanderson, *Respondent, v.*The Board of Canvassers of Greene County, *Appellants.*

— Motion to dismiss appeal granted.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Meyers, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Dated: May 10, 2010

/s/ DANIEL MEYERS Daniel Meyers Chief Executive Officer and President


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The First Marblehead Corporation and will be retained by The First
Marblehead Corporation and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE
QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-Q
TO BE FILED UNDER SECTIONS 13 AND 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, AS AMENDED I, Charles M. Baughn, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hines Real Estate
Investment Trust, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. /s/ CHARLES M. BAUGHNCharles M. BaughnChief Executive Officer
 Date: November 12, 2004
No. 56037.

protest 172735-K (New York).

#### Paramount Pictures Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the papers disclosing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, the motion to dismiss was granted.
#### Continental Ceramics Corp. *v.*United States

No. 6324.

Entry No. 769362/2, etc.

Invoices dated Liverpool, England, June 6, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 19, 1941, etc.

(Decided August 21, 1946)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard F. Weeks,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Keeee, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise consisting of earthenware and chinaware and the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues decided in *United States*v. *William S. Pitcairn Corp.,*Suit No. 4513, C. A. D. 334, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the appraised value of the merchandise consisting of earthenware and chinaware involved in each of the cases enumerated *287in the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
ZF 8-Speed Auto Trans Analysis

Create 6-Speed with Similar Technology

Status Update – 16Sept2010
brake A

brake B twin damper

clutch E

clutch C

clutch D

gearset 1

gearset 2

gearset 3

gearset 4

Cross section – parts 8 speed

torque converter clutch mechatronics

oil pump

park lock ring

Transmission Control Unit (TCU)

3-line torque converter Source: ZF at SSO Symposium, 2008
ZF 8-speed Auto Transmission

• Developed since the Lepellerier- based 6-

speed transmission could not be optimized 

to satisfy stiffening fuel consumption and 

CO2 emission goals.

• ZF developers were searching for the 

“ideal planetary gear set”.

• Transmission control unit (TCU) built into 

transmission “Mechatronic Module”.
ZF 8-speed Auto Transmission

• Built in hybrid functionally with no change 

to the standard transmission design.

• Full hybrid requires the same installation 

space as a conventional version.

• Hydraulic Impulse Storage (HIS) 

integrated with stop/start function yields 

11% fuel savings. 
ZF 8-speed Auto Transmission

• External starting element can be 

eliminated by utilizing one of the internal 

multi-disk brakes as a wet starting system.

• Transmission pump is a double stroke 

vane type with roller style gear chain

• Torque converter is 3-line for optimal 

cooling and flooding even with a closed 

converter clutch.
ZF 8-speed Auto Transmission

• Sensors – Speed, hall, temperature and 

position.

• Hydraulics- 2 valve housings and a 

separator, 14 valves and 7 pressure 

regulators. Lower has a solenoid housing 

with 7 valves and inserts.

• Dynamic pressure equalization chambers 

and disk springs (piston return).
ZF 8-speed Auto Transmission

• Shift elements contain multidisc clutches 

and brakes with separate outer and lined 

disks. Ondular washer for shifting quality.

• 5 shift elements and 4 simple planetary 

gear sets.

• 2 open shift elements per gear.

• 2 Brakes 3 Clutches
ZF 8-speed Auto Transmission

• Carriers 1 & 2 are molded.

• Gear set 3 is low load ( transmits power to 

the 4th gear and upwards).

– All Aluminum die cast

• Gear set 4 has drive shaft and parking 

brake integrated (2 part welded).

• All Gear sets can be utilized as 3 or 4 

planet designs. 
ZF 8-speed Auto Transmission

• Gear set 1 has a 5 planet option.

• Reported that lost torque is reduced by 1/3 

compared to a 6-speed.

• Reported Gear set efficiency exceeds 

98%.
ZF 8-speed Auto Transmission

• Next Steps

– Teardown of ZF 6-speed (Completed 

14Sept2010 ).

– Catalog and compare 8 Catalog and compare 8-speed vs 6 speed vs 6-speed 

components for scaling and analysis (current).

– Compile possible eliminations/reductions in 

content and material to achieve 6-speed auto 

transmission (current).
ZF 8-speed Auto Transmission

– Meet with P. Latham to discuss other possible 

content/design changes to incorporate into 

analysis.

– Revise assumption and enter data into MAQS 

worksheet.

– Summarize into CMAT for review
ZF 8-speed Auto Transmission

• Spare Charts
Clutch schedule

Gear brake 

A

brake 

B

clutch 

C

clutch 

D

clutch 

E

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

R

= closed

= open
ZF 6H28
Exhibit 13.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Petrobras Energía Participaciones, S.A. (the Company), does hereby
certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual
Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form
20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |  |                                          
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated: June 30, 2005 |  | /s/ Alberto Guimarães                    
|                     |  | Alberto Guimarães Chief Executive
Officer
|                     | 
|Dated: June 30, 2005 |  | /s/ Luis Sas                             
|                     |  | Luis Sas Chief Financial Officer         



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EPA REGISTRATION NO.84229-6

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*4647*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*48*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*495051______________________________________________________________ Page is not included in this copy. Pages 52 through 57 are not included in this copy.

_________________________________________________________________
The material not included contains the following type of information: _____ Identity of product inert ingredients. __X __ Identity of product impurities. __X __ Description of the product manufacturing process. __X ___ Description of quality control procedures. _____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. _____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. _____ A draft product label.

__ __ The product confidential statement of formula. _____ Information about a pending registration action. _____ FIFRA registration data. _____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. _____ The document is not responsive to the request.

__ __ Internal deliberative information. _____ Attorney-client privilege. _____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the Agency.

The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102______________________________________________________________ Page is not included in this copy. Pages 103 through 104 are not included in this copy.

_________________________________________________________________
The material not included contains the following type of information: _____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

__ __ Identity of product impurities.

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process.

__ __ Description of quality control procedures.

__ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients. _____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. _____ A draft product label. __X __ The product confidential statement of formula. _____ Information about a pending registration action.

__ __ FIFRA registration data.

__ __ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _

. _____ The document is not responsive to the request.

__ __ Internal deliberative information.

__ __ Privileged attorney-client communication.

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the Agency.
No. 64981.

#### Railway Express Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/12523, 59/19101, and 59/23813 (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 07/25/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Colorado Energy Expo held on 06/27/2014

SUMMARY: 

Laura Farris, EPA Region 8 Climate Change Coordinator, and Cindy Beeler, EPA Region 8 Energy Advisor, 

hosted a booth and held discussions on the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants with 

various members of the public on 06/27/2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was 

proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA Region 8

Laura Farris

Cindy Beeler

External Stakeholders

Members of the Public

ATTACHMENTS

Clean Power Plan Factsheets
(Reap. Dec. 10506)

#### United States *v.*Vikingo, Ltd.

Entry No. 823025.

(Decided April 14, 1963)

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto :

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise which is the subject of this Collector’s Appeal for reappraisement consists of woven fabrics, weighing over 4 ounces per sq. yd., wholly or in chief value of wool, exported from Italy on October 19, 1961.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that woven fabrics, weighing over 4 ounces per sq. yd., wholly or in chief value of wool, are not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and are subject to appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress, 2nd Session), under Sec. 402 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as so amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, is 55 cents per sq. yd. net packed.

> IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal for reappraisement be and the same hereby is submitted on this stipulation.

*466On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value for the woven fabrics here under consideration is 55 cents per square yard, net, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 24-0004 

IN RE THE PETITION OF 

ELLEN "ELLIE" KAYE BASTIAN ORDER 

Ellen "Ellie" Kay Bastian has petitioned this Court for admission to active status in 

the State Bar of Montana after having been on inactive status since March 2022. 

IT IS ORDERED that upon payment of the appropriate fees to the State Bar of 

Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice of law in the state of Montana. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within six months of the date of this Order, 

Petitioner shall submit to the Board of Continuing Legal Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena, 

MT 59624, proof of attendance at thirty hours of approved Continuing Legal Education to 

be credited to the time Petitioner was on inactive status. Consideration of continuing 

education credits obtained by the petitioner during the last two years, not applied to 

previous Montana requirements, for application to this requirement can be undertaken by 

the CLE Commission, in its sole discretion. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this 4th day of September, 2024. 

For the Court, 

FILED 

SEP 0 4 2024 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

Stiate of Montane 

09/04/2024

Case Number: PR 24-0004
- 1 -

Supreme Court

 No. 2024-36-M.P. 

In the Matter of Raymond J. Haskell, Jr. : 

O R D E R

On January 26, 2024, pursuant to Article III, Rule 13 of the Supreme Court 

Rules of Disciplinary Procedure for Attorneys, the respondent, Raymond J. Haskell, 

Jr., filed an affidavit with the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court setting forth 

that he is aware that he is the subject of an investigation of professional misconduct. 

The respondent’s affidavit sets forth that he freely and voluntarily consents to 

disbarment, and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his consent. 

On February 5, 2024, Disciplinary Counsel filed the respondent’s affidavit with the 

Court. 

Upon review of the respondent’s affidavit, we deem that an order disbarring 

respondent is appropriate.

Accordingly, pursuant to Article III, Rule 13, it is hereby ordered, adjudged 

and decreed that the respondent, Raymond J. Haskell, Jr., be and is hereby disbarred 

on consent from engaging in the practice of law.
- 2 -

The respondent is directed to comply with all aspects of Article III, Rule 15 

and within ten (10) days after the effective date of the disbarment order the 

respondent shall file with the Clerk of this Court an affidavit showing:

(1) That he has fully complied with the provisions of the order and with the

requirements of Article III, Rule 15;

(2) A list of other state, federal and administrative jurisdictions to which he is

admitted to practice; and

(3) That he has served a copy of this affidavit upon Disciplinary Counsel. The

affidavit shall also set forth the residence or other address where

communications may thereafter be directed to the respondent.

Entered as an Order of this Court this 19th day of February 2024.

By Order,

/s/ Meredith A. Benoit 

Clerk

.
SU-CMS-02B (revised November 2022)

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND

SUPREME COURT – CLERK’S OFFICE

Licht Judicial Complex

250 Benefit Street

Providence, RI 02903

ORDER COVER SHEET

Title of Case In the Matter of Raymond J. Haskell, Jr.

Case Number No. 2024-36-M.P.

Date Order Filed February 19, 2024

Justices Suttell, C.J., Goldberg, Robinson, Lynch Prata, and 

Long, JJ.

Source of Appeal N/A

Judicial Officer from Lower Court N/A

Attorney(s) on Appeal

For Petitioner:

Kerry Reilley Travers, Esq.

Chief Disciplinary Counsel

For Respondent: 

John F. Cicilline, Esq.