alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael C. Jones v. State.

178 So. 404.

Opinion Filed January 22, 1938.

*Michael C. Jones, in pro per*for Petitioner;

No appearance contra.

Chapman J.,

It having been made to appear by sworn petition of Michael C. Jones for a"writ of error *coram nobis*that he was .convicted of the crime of armed robbery in the Criminal Court of Record of Hillsborough County and sentenced to the State Prison of Florida for the term of his natural life. That on writ of error to the judgment of conviction the same was affirmed by this Court and reported in 122 Fla. 307, 165 Sou. Rep. 33. The basis of the petition is the alleged perjured testimony of William B. Poling given at the trial of the petitioner, coupled with “duress, coercion, intimidation and threats” by the prosecuting officer to induce the witness Poling to testify falsely *646against petitioner. The affidavit of Annie Louis Burrows was filed in support of the petition. It is further alleged that material facts were in existence which were not adjudicated by the trial court.

In the case of Lamb v. State, 91 Fla. 396, text p. 405, 107 Sou. Rep. 535, this Court said: “The remedy cannot be invoked on the ground that an important witness testified falsely about a 'material issue in the case, nor can newly discovered evidence, going to the merits of the issue tried be used as a basis for the writ.” See Washington v. State, 95 Fla. 289, 116 Sou. Rep. 470; Reed v. State, 94 Fla. 32, 113 Sou. Rep. 630, Skipper v. State (Fla.) 173 So. 692.

The petition fails to show sufficient facts authorizing the order sought. The petition is denied.

Ellis, C. J..,.and Wi-iitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Brown, J., concurs specially.

Brown, J.

(concurring specially).—I think the petition and accompanying affidavits might make out a good *prima facie*showing for leave to apply to trial court for writ of error *coram nobis*under the principles laid down by this court in Skipper v. State, 124 Fla. 384, 169 So. 58, 64, and in Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103, 55 S. C. 340, 79 L. Ed. 791, if it were not for the fact that there was other evidence in the case sufficient to have supported the judgment of conviction, such as the sworn confession of the defendant, petitioner here, referred to in the opinion of this Court affirming the judgment of conviction, which is cited in the above opinion by Mr. Justice Chapman.

Chapman, J., concurs.
#### Faust *v.*State.

In Banc.

Nov. 8, 1948.

(37 So. (2d) 315)

F. D. Hewitt and A. G. Stratton, for appellant.

R. O. Arrington, Assistant Attorney General for appellee.

*298Montgomery, J.

Appellant was convicted upon an affidavit charging him with the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor before the Mayor of the Town of Liberty and Ex-Officio Justice of the Peace and fined the sum of $100 and sentenced to serve thirty days in jail, from which judgment he appealed to the Circuit Court of Amite County, where he was again tried and convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $400 and to serve 90 days in jail, the jail sentence being suspended upon the payment of the fine. Prom this judgment he brings the case here on appeal.

We have examined all of the questions raised in appellant’s assignment of error and find no merit in any of them. This would require an affirmance of the judgment of the trial court, were it not for the further fact that the verdict of guilty in the trial court was not based upon sufficient substantial, reasonable and competent testimony, tending to establish the guilt of appellant beyond a reasonable doubt, and to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis.

There was no motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict of conviction was'against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Unless waived by the State,, such a motion is necessary before this Court can consider the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Justice v. State, 170 Miss. 96, 154 So. 265; Dixon v. State, 188 Miss. 797, 196 So. 637; Davis v. State, 173 Miss. 783, 163 So. 391; Byrd v. State, 179 Miss. 336, 175 So. 190; McLendon v. State, 187 Miss. 247, 191 So. 821; McDougal v. State, 199 Miss. 39, 23 So. (2d) 920.

 If the State had raised the point that the motion for a new trial does not contain the ground that the verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evi*299deuce then this Court would not consider the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction. Holmes v. State, 201 Miss. 509, 29 So. (2d) 312. In that case this court held that it is within the province of the Attorney General to waive the point and when he does so it is not obligatory on us to raise it ourselves.

The State has not raised the point in this case that the motion for a new trial does assign that as a ground. The point is thereby waived, Holmes v. State, supra; Aderson v. State, Miss., 33 So. (2d) 790.

After a careful review of the record, we are convinced that the evidence in this case is not sufficient to establish the guilt of the appellant beyond a reasonable doubt, and to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis. Accordingly the case is reversed and remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 

**- 2296** 

DEMIN JIANG, a/k/a De Min Jiang, a/k/a De Ming Jiang

,

Petitioner

,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for R eview of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals

.

Submitted : July 19, 2011 Decided: August 5, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael Brow n , New York, New York, f or Petitioner. Tony West,

Assistant Attorney General, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Assistant

Director, Dawn S. Conrad, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION,

Washington, D .C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CU RIAM:

Demin Jiang, a native and citizen of China, petitions

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration App eals

(Board) denying his motion to reopen as untimely and numerically

barred. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no

abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Jiang’s motion.

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly deny the

petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In

re: Jiang , (B.I.A. Oct. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument be cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coast Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Brian P. Peters, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                                       
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 23, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Brian P. Peters                                   
|                     |  |     |  | Brian P. Peters, President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Exhibit 12

                               MSW ENERGY HOLDINGS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

                          COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                             (Unaudited)

                                      (in thousands of dollars)

                                                           For the Three            For the Three
                                                         Months Ended March       Months Ended March
                                                              31, 2005                 31, 2004
                                                        -------------------   ---------------------
EARNINGS:
<S>                                                     <C>                  <C>
        Pre-tax income from continuing operations
            before adjustment for minority
            interest in consolidated subsidiary            $   2,862                $    (961)

        Less earnings attributable to Ref-Fuel
            Holdings prior to consolidation                       --                    4,539
                                                        -------------------   ---------------------
        Add (deduct):                                      $   2,862                $  (5,500)
            Fixed charges                                     16,913                   (5,055)
            Distributed earnings of Ref-Fuel
               Holdings prior to consolidation                    --                   23,904
                                                        -------------------   ---------------------
        Earnings, as adjusted                              $  19,775                $  23,459
                                                        ===================   =====================
FIXED CHARGES:
        Interest expense                                   $  16,913                $   5,055
                                                        -------------------   ---------------------
        Fixed charges                                      $  16,913                $   5,055
                                                        ===================   =====================
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES:                             1.17x                   4.64x
                                                        ===================   =====================
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.9


 


RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


OF


Ingen Technologies, Inc.


 


The undersigned, being members of the Board
of Directors of Ingen Technologies, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, do hereby declare and state that they consent to and hereby adopt
the following resolutions and/or the following actions:


 


RESOLVED: According to
the Board of Director meeting on February 20th, 2015, the Board unanimously agreed to do the following:


 


		1.	Facilitate a name change of the existing corporation to one that reflects the entity to be a holding
company, not specific to any Industry.



 


		2.	Amending our Certificate of Incorporation ("Certificate of Incorporation") to effect
a reverse stock split of our currently issued and outstanding shares of each class of Capital Stock, mainly our Common Stock Series
by a ratio of twenty five hundred for-one (2500:1), or as soon as it is approved by FINRA without reducing the number of our authorized
shares of capital stock (the "Reverse Stock Split")..



 


I certify that the Corporation is duly organized
and existing and has the power to take action called for by the above Resolution dated February 25, 2015.


 


 


Acknowledged by:


 





	By: /s/ Gary B. Tilden	 	2/25/2015	 
	Gary Tilden, Chairman of the Board	 	Date	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:/s/ David S. Hanson	 	2/25/2015	 
	David Hanson, CEO	 	Date	 
	 	 	 	 
	By: /s/ Richard Campbell	 	2/25/2015	 
	Richard Campbell, Director	 	Date	 



 








    	1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-563]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER06-919-000]


Southern Company Services, Inc.; Notice of Non-Decisional Status

January 10, 2007.
    Take notice that, for purposes of the above-captioned docket (and 
all subdockets in those dockets), Scott P. Molony, Chief, Regulatory 
Accounting Branch, and Steven D. Hunt, Auditor, in the Division of 
Financial Regulation, Office of Enforcement are non-decisional 
authorities and non-decisional employees. Cf. 18 CFR 385.102(a) (2006) 
(definition of decisional authority); 18 CFR 385.2201(c)(3) (2006) 
(definition of decisional employee).

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-563 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Response to Comments for the Clean Water Rule: Definition of “ Waters of the United States ”

The Response to Comments Document, together with the preamble to the final Clean Water Rule, presents the responses of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of the Army (collectively “the agencies”) to the more than one million public comments received on the proposed rule (79 FR 22188 (Apr. 21, 2014)). The agencies have addressed all significant issues raised in the public comments.

Because of the volume of comments received, the Response to Comment Document is present ed in a number of different topical compendiums. Each of these compendiums is available as attachments to this docket entry . The compendiums were numbered for convenience based on the database used to track incoming comments, and no particular meaning is intended by the numbering system. In total, all of these compendiums represent the agencies’ formal Response to Comment Document.

These com pendiums have been formatted to be compliant with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, which require s Federal agencies to make their electronic and information technology accessible to people with disabi lities. In addition, the compendiums have been reformatted to ensure margins, typeface, comment and response numbers, and identification of pictures with t ext are consistent throughout. There have been n o changes to the content or substance of the Response to Comment document that was prepared at signature of the Clean Water Rule.

T he Response to Comments Document, together with the preamble to the Clean Water Rule and the information contained in the Technical Support Document, the Science Report, and the rest of the administrative record should be considered collectively as the agencies’ response to all of the significant comments submitted on the proposed rule. Where there are slight differences, the language in th e final preamble and rule controls and should be used for purposes of understanding the scope, requirements,

and basis of the final rule.
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010
(the “Report”) of Full Circle Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John E.
Stuart, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




/s/    John
      E. StuartName:
              John
      E. StuartDate:
              September 28,
      2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth Klipper, Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Accounting Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



Date: May 8, 2009

/s/ KENNETH KLIPPER Kenneth Klipper Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The First Marblehead Corporation and will be retained by The First Marblehead Corporation
and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard E. Bornhoft, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the managing owner
of The Frontier Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The
     Frontier Fund.


                                        /s/ Richard E. Bornhoft
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard E. Bornhoft
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer of
                                        Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the
                                        Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund

                                        May 16, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or any
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The Frontier
Fund and will be retained by The Frontier Fund and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September 13, 2011 | /s/ Zan Wu                                   |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                | Zan Wu                                       |
|                                | Chief Financial Officer                      |
|                                | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, DC 20460

Section 4 Submission

This is an original submission:

✔

This is an amendment:

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that (1) all information entered on this form is

complete and accurate; and (2) any confidentiality claims are true and correct as to that information

for which they have been asserted. Any knowing and willful misinterpretation is subject to criminal

penalty pursuant to 18 USC 1001.

Signature: Official Title:

Regulatory Specialist

Contact Person:

Ann Marie Savini

Email Address:

asavini@harcros.com

Date Signed:

05/28/2015

PART 1 Contact Information

Submission

Information

Submission Type:

TestRules

Form Alias:

Daphnia Report

Federal Register Notice:

76 FR 1067

Date Submitted:

05/28/2015

Submitter

Information

Company Name:

HARCROS CHEMICALS

Address:

5200 SPEAKER ROAD

KANSAS CITY, KS, 66106

United States

Contact Person:

Ann Marie Savini

Phone Number:

9136217802

Email Address:

asavini@harcros.com

Technical Contact

Information

CBI

Yes: 	No: 

✔

Company Name:

HARCROS CHEMICALS

Address:

5200 SPEAKER ROAD

KANSAS CITY, KS, 66106

United States

Contact Person:

Ms Ann Marie Savini

Phone Number:

9136217802

Email Address:

asavini@harcros.com

PART 2 Letter Of Intent
SEC4 Submission Page 2

Chemical

Identification

CASRN:

31138-65-5

CBI

Yes: 	No: 

✔

Chemical Name:

D-gluco-heptonic acid, monosodium salt, (2.xi.)-

Chemical Test Name:

C1

Sponsoring Firms CBI

Yes: 	No: 

✔

Company Name:

Harcros Chemicals

Address:

5200 Speaker Rd.

Kansas City, KS, 66106

United States

Phone Number:

9136217802

Additional

Information

Document Type:

Submission of Equivalence Data

CBI

Yes: 	No: 

✔

File Name:

Daphnia - Submitted to EPA 5-28-

15.pdf

Attachment Date:

05/28/2015

Sanitized Document Upload:

N/A

Chemicals

Paperwork Reduction Act: The Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) (44 U.S.C. 3501) provides that, when practicable, Federal organizations use electronic forms, electronic filings, and

electronic signatures to conduct official business with the public. EPA's Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR) (40 CFR part 3), published in the Federal Register on October 13,

2005 (70 FR 59848) (FRL-7977-1)(Ref. 2), provides that any requirement in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to submit a report directly to EPA can be satisfied with an electronic

submission that meets certain conditions once the Agency published a notice in the Federal Register announcing that EPA is prepared to receive certain documents in electronic form. For more

information about CROMERR, go to http://www.epa.gov/cromerr/.