alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-K ofVirginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007,I, William K. Beauchesne, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of VirginiaCommerce Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) such Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|  /s/ William K. Beauchesne       |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| William K. Beauchesne                 |   |
| Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

SUCCESSION OF LUCIEN HARRY

MARIONEAUX, SR. 

NO. 2021 CW 1597

MARCH 28, 2022

In Re: Lucien H. Marioneaux, Jr., applying for supervisory

writs, 1st Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo, 

No. 594, 235. 

BEFORE: McDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to provide

documentation that this writ application was timely filed under

Rules 4- 2 and 4- 3, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, 

in accordance with the provisions of La. Code Civ. P. art. 

1914( A) and ( B). There is no evidence that a judgment was

ordered by the trial court or that a written request for

judgment was filed within 10 days of the ruling in open court so

as to require a written judgment. Furthermore, the writ

application is missing the notice of judgment which was mailed

to relator along with the written judgment which could

demonstrate that the notice of intent filed on November 16, 2021

is timely. Moreover, the writ application does not contain the

pleading upon which this ruling is based, the motion to enforce

and contempt, nor does it contain a

copy of the opposition, in

violation of Rules 4- 5( C)( 8) and ( 9), Uniform Rules of Louisiana

Courts of Appeal. The application does not contain a copy of the

court minutes, in violation of Rule 4- 5( 0)( 10), Uniform Rules of

Louisiana Courts of Appeal. In addition, this court requires a

copy of the pertinent hearing transcript. 

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an

application for rehearing will not be considered. Rules 2- 18. 7

and 4- 9, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. 

In the event relator seeks to file a new application with

this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation

including documentation to show the original writ application

was timely, and any other documents listed above, and must

comply with Rule 2- 12. 2, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of

Appeal. Any new application must be filed on or before April 28, 

2022 and must contain a copy of this ruling. 

JMM

WIL

EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY WRI OFOURT

FOR THE COURT
#### Jane Moncrief, *Appellant, v.*Melancthon C. Lockwood, *Respondent.*

— Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8711 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8711

  To amend title II of the Public Health Service Act to include as an 
 additional right or privilege of commissioned officers of the Public 
 Health Service (and their beneficiaries) certain leave provided under 
 title 10, United States Code to commissioned officers of the Army (or 
                         their beneficiaries).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2024

Ms. Houlahan (for herself and Mr. Bacon) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title II of the Public Health Service Act to include as an 
 additional right or privilege of commissioned officers of the Public 
 Health Service (and their beneficiaries) certain leave provided under 
 title 10, United States Code to commissioned officers of the Army (or 
                         their beneficiaries).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF LEAVE PROVISIONS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 221(a) of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 213a(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(22) Chapter 40, Leave.''.
    (b) Conforming Repeal.--Section 219 of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 210-1) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

t1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145747

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145747

COA: 303436 

Wayne CC: 10-011269-FH

DENNIS HUGUELY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Norman Andrews and others, Respondents, *v.*The City of Brooklyn, *Appellant.*

Order continuing injunction affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by Barnard, P. J.
Exhibit 4.6

[CyPost KK]



June 30, 2000


                               Letter Of Agreement

                 Transfer of Shares to CyPost Corporation, U.S.





Provided that CyPost Corporation, US sells CyPost KK to Access Media
International, I, Jiro Miyamoto, a member of CyPost KK management, agree to
return forty-two (42) of my shares in CyPost KK, Stock to CyPost Corporation,
U.S. with no cost or liability to CyPost Corporation, U.S. and without any
further consideration or future claim(s) as of July 3, 2000 Japanese time.



/s/ Jiro Miyamoto                               /s/ Yoko Hiran
------------------------------------            --------------------------------
Jiro Miyamoto                                   witness



July 3, 2000      / Tokyo Japan
------------------------------------------
date / place




Bureau Toranomon 802, 2-7-16 Toranomon, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
Tel: 03-3502-0201
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, John L. McManus, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael P. McManus, Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer of the Company, each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date: May
1, 2009




__/s/ John L.
McManus_______


John L.
McManus


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)










Date: May
1, 2009




­­__/s/ Michael P.
McManus_____________


Michael
P. McManus


Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)








THIS CERTIFICATION “ACCOMPANIES” THE
QUARTERLY REPORT, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SEC AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED
BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (WHETHER MADE BEFORE
OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE ANNUAL REPORT), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL
INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS
CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE
COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF
UPON REQUEST.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1784 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 93.CM PIht'l Docket Number: 

# A-84-4 4

Printed 10/31/2008 8:05:42 AM Sheet 93 of 143P. 2

-^ ' T -if /-J 1 /£>- ' AR I Technologies , Inc ; Leste r Hardiso njl'

lL ' y (312)359-781 0 * 4/1/8 5 LO-CA T wil l wor kO Ki nsmal l plant s Chemica l cost-sulfu r 87. 5 TP Dlarges t u pt o 1 5 TP Drefine r ma y selec t LO-CA T 15-3 0 questionabl e abov e 3 0 Clau s 1 t o 10 % H2 S seem s high N o Clau s belo w

1 0 LT/ D (har dt o tur ndown ) Sou r wate r strippe r 0/ Hgoe s t o LO-CA T incinerato r 0 H2 S i noutle t 5/21/8 5 1/ 3 me npe r shif t fo r labo r capita l cos t diffe r fro

m 1 t o 10 % H2 S no t significan t 6/10/8 5 no dat a oncausti c scrubbin g availabl e technolog y

i s no t a goo dchoic e (1 ) cos t o f causti c (2 ) cos t o f disposa l
14910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal AviatioD Administration ONClIRRF.NCES OUTING S"MSOl 14 CFR Part 39 

# ()70Cr>

C. r-f.sv<-

OUTING SYMSOl OUTING SYMSQl INJnALSiSIG

lNmALS/SiG

• Fax: 202-493-225J. [Docket No. FAA-2010-++++; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-064-AD]

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FtA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: Wepropose to adopt anew airwokhiness directive (AD) forcertain Mod 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F series aUPl1es. This proposed AD would require modifying certain thrust reverser control systemlWiring to the flap control unit (FeU). ' This proposed AD results from areport ofautolatic retraction ofthe leading edge flaps, during takeoff due to indications transmitted to the FeU from thethrust reverser control system. We are proposing this AD toprevent aJomatic retraction ofthe leading edge flaps during takeoff, which could result inreducbctclimb performance and consequent collision with terrain and obstacles orforced lan~ing ofthe airplane. DATES: We must receive comments on this pr1posed AD hy [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION INTHE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by anI ofthe following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to hJ:!/VV\vw.regUlations.gOv. Follow the instructions for submiuing comments . RlN 2120-AA64

Whitney PW4000 Series Engines Ain'Vorthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747AOOD, and 747AOOF Series Airplanes Equipped with Gene~al Electric CF6-80C2 orPratt & 

# IDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2010-++++; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-064-AD)

.RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747~400D, and 747-400F Series Airplanes Equipped with General Electric CF6-80C2 or Pratt & Whitney PW4000 Series Engines AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: Wepropose foadopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) forcertain Mod 747-400.747-4000, and 747-400F series airplanes. TIllsproposed AD would require modifying certain thrust reverser control system wiring tothe flap control unit (FeU). Hm.o.lS,lSIG

Olll1NG S'tMBOL ", This proposed AD results from areport ofautomatic retraction ofthe leading edge flaps An; during takeoff due to indications transmitted to the FeU from thethrust reverser control system. We are proposing this AD to prevent automatic retraction ofthe leading edge flaps during takeoff, which could result inreduced climb performance and consequent collision with terrain and obstacles orforced landing ofthe airplane. DATES: We must receive comments onthis proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45 NmAl.SIS1G DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION INTHE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any ofthe following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://wwvv.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments .

• Fax: 202-493-2251.
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dunn Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dunn Series.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                     
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Dunn Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                       
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                        
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                            
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Dunn Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: August 13, 2007
#### Albert Dings, Resp’t, *v.*Rosella M. Guthrie, App’lt.

*Edgar Hull,*for resp’t; *Lonson Eraser,*for app’lt.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur, except Potter, J., not sitting.

Affirming 12 N. Y. State Rep., 441.
No. 55345.

#### Leacock & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 127162-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the. court dismissed the protest.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6796
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. AULL; BECKETT, JR.; T. ESTERLINE; JAMES PARRISH , Defendants

- Appellees

.

No. 19
- 6824
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. AULL; BECKETT, JR.; T. ESTERLINE; JAMES PARRISH , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Cameron McGowan Currie , Senior District Judge ; Paige Jones Gossett, Magistrate Judge . ( 0:18

- cv - 01418

- CMC

- PJG )2 Submitted : October 15, 2019 Decided: October 17, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion

.
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Robert Louis Garrett, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motion for a prelimina ry injunction and denying his motion to alter or amend ; the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order and allowing Garrett until June 25, 2019, to file any motion to amend or supplement his compl ai nt ; the magistrate judge’s order dismissing as moot Garrett’s motion to compel and for sanctions, motion to stay, two motions to supplement the motion to compel and for sanctions, and Defendants’ motion for extension of time ; and the magistrate judge’s order denying Garrett’s motions to a ppoint counsel

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The denial of Garrett’s motion for a preliminary injunction is an appealable interlocutory order. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the denial of the preliminary injunction or motion to recon sider. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court

. Garrett v. Aull , No. 0:18

- cv - 01418

- CMC

- PJG (D.S.C. Apr. 12, 2019 & May 30, 2019). The remaining t hree orders are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
AFFIRMED IN PART , DISMISSED IN PART
## Exhibit E Pinnacl X Fixed Wing Training

Pinnacl X Fixed Wing Training

Pinnacl X fixed wing pilots will be required to take and pass a 4 to 8 hour course involving regulations, principles of flight, weather, operations, crash investigation and flight maneuvers. Pinnacl X requires that all pilots pass a written exam with a 80 percent score, preflight and inflight tests similar to the requirement for manned aircraft

. Additional ly the pilot must have logged 20 fixed w ing fligh t hours performing maneuvers at differen t locations and with distractions , table 1

. The errors on the written exam must be corrected with a qualified instructor. These requirements are in addition to the FAA requirements. Areas that are covered on the exam were determine from the flight testing under COAs

2013

- ESA

- 89

- COA, 2013

- ESA

- 96

- COA and 2015

- 0667 and will be updated as the experience with fixed
wing flight inspection flight s

. Also the Pinnacl X team has been involved with sUAS development since

2006. Copies of the lecture notes are appended

, table 2 . The lecture notes will be updated at regular intervals to keep up with the rapid changing UAS regulations and technology.

Table 1, Pinnacl X Pilot Proficiency Requirements

Maneuver Maneuver Takeoff and landing in manual mode Demonstration of G PS signal loss and barometric pressure loss Demonstrate inflight checks in all modes Demonstrate piloting ability during distractions Demonstrate figure eight flight in all modes at 50 ft AGL, 75 ft AGL and 150 to 200 ft AGL Operate aircraft in all flig ht modes in RT and LT
pattern s flight with aircraft pointing away, facing and on port and starboard sides Recover from an unusual orientation and fly back to starting point in manual mode Demonstrate proper landing procedure in confined

areas Demonstrate flight maneuvers indifferent areas

Table 2 , Pinnacl X Required Training

Lecture Title FAA Reference

COA Process Exhibit E 1 FAA Regulations and Airspace Exhibit E 2 Principles of Fixed Wing Flight Exhibit E 9
Weather Exhibit E 4 Fixed Wing Check List Exhibit E5 Fixed Wing Crash Investigation Exhibit E6 Fixed Wing Flight Training Exhibit E7 Fixed Wing Flight Training in Close Prox Exhibit E8 Fixed Wing UAS Check List Exhibit E9
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# Federal Register Citation Of Previous Announcement:

[To be Published]. 

# Status:

Closed Meeting. 

# Place:

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC. 

# Date And Time Of Previously Announced Meeting:

Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 2 p.m. 

# Change In The Meeting:

Time Change. 

The Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 2 p.m. has been changed to Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 1 p.m. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

 Dated: March 16, 2007. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

 [FR Doc. E7-5131 Filed 3-20-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P