Affirmed as Modified and Opinion Filed April 6, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00061-CR 

No. 05-14-00062-CR 

No. 05-14-00063-CR 

TASHIMA NICOLE EVERHART, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F-0825802-S; F-0825716-S; and F-0825717-S 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

Tashima Nicole Everhart was convicted of fraudulent use or possession of less than five 

items of identifying information/habitual, assault on a public servant, and forgery of a financial 

instrument/check. In each case, she was given a suspended sentence and placed on community 

supervision. She was subsequently convicted on a new charge of fraudulent use or possession of 

fifty or more items of identifying information, and the trial court revoked her probation on all 

three previous offenses and sentenced her to two years in state jail on the forgery charge and five 

years in prison on the other two charges, with all sentences to run concurrently. 

Appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous 

and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the records showing why, in effect, there 
 –2– 

are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. 

App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised 

appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. 

State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts 

and counsel in Anders cases). 

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree 

the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably 

support the appeals. 

Although not an arguable issue, we note the judgment revoking community supervision 

in No. 05-14-00061-CR (fraudulent use or possession of less than five items of identifying 

information/habitual) does not reflect appellant’s pleas or the trial court’s findings on two 

enhancement paragraphs alleged in the indictment. The pleas and findings are reflected on the 

original judgment placing appellant on community supervision. Accordingly, we modify the 

trial court’s judgment revoking community supervision in No. 05-14-00061-CR to reflect that 

appellant pleaded true to both the first and second enhancement paragraphs and the trial court 

found true both the first and second enhancement paragraphs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); 

Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d). 

 
 –3– 

We affirm the judgments in Nos. 05-14-00062-CR and 05-14-00063-CR. As modified, 

we affirm the judgment in 05-14-00061-CR and order the trial court to enter an amended 

judgment revoking community supervision reflecting the above modifications. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 

140061F.U05 

 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
 –4– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

TASHIMA NICOLE EVERHART, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-00061-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F-0825802-S. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis; 

Justices Lang-Miers and Whitehill 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is MODIFIED

as follows: 

To reflect (1) a Plea of True to the 1st and 2nd Enhancement Paragraphs and (2) 

a Finding of True to the 1st and Second Enhancement Paragraphs. 

As MODIFIED, the judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered April 6, 2015. 

 
 –5– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

TASHIMA NICOLE EVERHART, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-00062-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F-0825716-S. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis; 

Justices Lang-Miers and Whitehill 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered April 6, 2015. 

 
 –6– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

TASHIMA NICOLE EVERHART, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-00063-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F-0825717-S. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis; 

Justices Lang-Miers and Whitehill 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered April 6, 2015.