alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Thomas Tully Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6620.

Entry No. 27, etc.

Pro forma invoices dated Aylestone, England, May 28, 1941, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., July 2, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 16, 1946)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the *218value of tlie merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### ANTHONY JASICZEK, AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN, *AD LITEM, ET ALS.,*PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Mr. Sidney O. Swirslcy*and *Mr. Walter S. Stvirslcy*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. O’Mara,*Schumann, *Davis & Session*for the respondents.

May 16, 1967.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of DayStar Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), I, John R. Tuttle, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 12, 2005

/s/ John R. TuttleJohn R. Tuttle, President andChief Executive Officer




This Certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DayStar Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by DayStar Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ACCEPTED 12-14-00302-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 8/12/2015 5:18:55 PM CATHY LUSK CLERK
#### Commonwealth *v.*Finnie, Appellant.

Submitted May 26, 1969.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*630
      *Albert -Finnic,*appellant, in propria persona.

*Jerome T. Foe^-ster,*Assistant District Attorney, and *LeRoy S. Zimmerman,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

June 27, 1969:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   345,554
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     48,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                468,846
<PP&E>                          559,510
<DEPRECIATION>                  187,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,274,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,035,200
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        13,114
<OTHER-SE>                      (21,273)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,274,970
<SALES>                         1,796,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,813,274
<CGS>                           861,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   4,184,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              74,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (2,371,264)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (2,371,264)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (2,371,264)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.00




</TABLE>
Maryann Castro

V.

Manuel Castro

In the Fourth Court Of Appeals

Fourth Court Of Appeals District

San Antonio Texas Bexar County

■',

l0

Re: Court Of Appeals Number: 04-14-00785-CV

Trial Court Case 2011 -CI-15957

On April 7th Here Comes Appellant Maryann Castro Filing motion to request

oral Argument in Appellants Brief in the Agreement for Final Divorce Signed Oct

30,2013 by Judge Canales

Appellant Maryann Castro pro-se and prays for the Court for relief and Justice.

Maryann Castro-Appellant Pro-se

1501 Olive

Jourdanton Texas 78026

830-496-0133

M/-7H

Pacattitude2014@gmail.com
#### In the Matter of FRANK L. JOHNSON, JR., an attorney at law.

March 27, 1967.

Name of respondent stricken from the roll of attorneys at law. Opinion reported at 49 *N. J.*110.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gordmans Stores, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey J. Gordman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jeffrey J. GordmanJeffrey J. Gordman Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer) March 31, 2011


This certification is being furnished solely to accompany
this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the registration statements (No. 333-115930 and No. 333-40806) on Form S-8 of Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. of our report dated March 6, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. as of
December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2005, and the related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.



|              
|--------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP  
|              
|Tampa, Florida
|March 9, 2007
#### Martin S. Cuykendall, *as Receiver, etc.,*Respondent, *v.*Ormond S. Gillim, *Administrator, etc., Appelant.*

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Dwight, J., not sitting.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of DayStar Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), I, John R. Tuttle, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 14, 2005



/s/ John R. TuttleJohn R. Tuttle, President and Chief Executive
Officer




This Certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DayStar Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by DayStar Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 58129.

protests 190632-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bingham & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is composed of rush and is not of grass nor of rice straw; that merchandise of like character is now being assessed at 20 percent under said paragraph 1021, as modified, supra; and that the termination of the said General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade with respect to concessions therein initially negotiated with China (T. D. 52587), insofar as said paragraph 1021 is concerned, related only to floor coverings of grass or of rice straw. Upon the agreed statement of facts, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 848 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 848

 To designate a peak in the State of Nevada as Maude Frazier Mountain, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

  Ms. Titus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate a peak in the State of Nevada as Maude Frazier Mountain, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MAUDE FRAZIER MOUNTAIN IN THE STATE OF 
              NEVADA.

    (a) In General.--The peak of Frenchman Mountain located at latitude 
3610'45" N, by longitude 11459'52" W in the State of Nevada shall be 
known and designated as ``Maude Frazier Mountain''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
record, or other paper of the United States to the peak referred to in 
subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to ``Maude Frazier 
Mountain''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY FRESCO, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Leonard I. Weinglass*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Brendan T. Byrne*and *Mr. Barry H. Rvenchiclc*for the respondent.

April 18, 1967.

Denied.
Request for Information Craig B Thompson (FAA-2015-4829) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Thompson: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−4829). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your

petition.

Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:20 PM 

To: craig@globalvideohq.com

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date 

listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by January 4, 2016.

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267–2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 59009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23416]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, October 11, 2013

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Enforcement Matters, and 
Examinations. In the event that the times or dates of this or any 
future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with the 
new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

 Natise Stowe,
 Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-23416 Filed 9-23-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this report on Form 10-QSB of Summit Financial Services Group, Inc. (the
Company), for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven C. Jacobs, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven C. Jacobs                                
|Steven C. Jacobs                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 14, 2007
#### James C. Fitzpatrick, *Respondent, v.*The New York and Manhattan Beach Railway Company, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinions by Barker, J., and by Brady,- P. J., dissenting.
No. 52682.

protest 141597-K (New York).

#### European Chemical & Metal Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
### Martin, Michael (OST) Subject: FW: Request for Extension of Bid Deadline

From: Barry Griffith [mailto:barryq@flytheshoals.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 12:44 PM To: Martin, Michael (OST) Cc: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); tom.heanue@flypib.com; Tom Williams <TWilliams@meridianairport.com> (TWilliams@meridianairport.com); Joshua Abramson; dyant@qreenvillems.org; Beale, Scott; Michael Mooney Subject: Re: Request for Extension of Bid Deadline Michael:**~,,,,__ -~**  "',:**:~** j

MSL is concernedthatADI has no gate at ATL and does not have any interline or code share agreements to our knowledge at this time. While we appreciate ADI's interest inMSL, it appears that they are not a legitimate bidder and cannot currently meet MSL's air service needs. We see no reasonto delay orextendthe May 19, 2014 deadline. Bestregards, Barry

1
#### Joseph W. Duryee, *Respondent, v.*The Mayor, etc., of the City of New York, *Appellants.*

—.Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Macomber, J., and Davis, P. J., and by Daniels, J., dissenting.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Global Energy Group, Inc.
    Form 10-KSB

Gentlemen:

As independent auditors, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report
and to all references to our firm included in or made a part of the Global
Energy Group, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No.
333-72526, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31,
2001.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Baumann, Raymondo & Company, P.A.
--------------------------------------
    Baumann, Raymondo & Company, P.A.
    Certified Public Accountants
    Tampa, Florida
    April 11, 2002
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Annual Report of Innovation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Blagman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
(Reap. Dec. 9196)

#### Meier & Frank Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1142, etc.

(Decided July 22, 1958)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court:

> That the issues involved in the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, are the same in all material respects as the issue involved in *Meier & Frank Co. Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9057.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation of the merchandise involved, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States was the appraised values less the amount added under duress by reason of Section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation for home consumption therein was no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in *Meier & Frank Co. Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9057 be incorporated herein and the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule A be submitted herewith.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the amount added under duress by reason of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### In the Matter of MARTIN L. BLATT, an attorney-at-law.

June 23, 1964.

Respondent reprimanded. Opinion reported at 42 *N. J.*522.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE



$525,000.00
December 20, 2000


     ON DEMAND, for value received, Liquitek Enterprises, Inc. promises to pay
to the order of HydroMaid International, Inc. at 1350 E. Draper Parkway, Draper,
Utah 84020 in the State of Utah the sum of Five Hundred-Twenty-Five Thousand
Dollars, in lawful money of the United States of America, with interest at the
rate of 6.2 percent per annum.

All due and payable on or before March 31, 2001. The sum due at the
aforementioned time is $533,982. (Five Hundred-Thirty-Three Thousand Nine
Hundred-Eighty-Two Dollars.)

Should suit be commenced to enforce payment of this note, Liquitek Enterprises,
Inc. promises to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as
attorney's fees in said suit.


HydroMaid International, Inc.           Liquitek Enterprises, Inc.


/s/ John W. Nagel                       /s/ Lester W. B. Moore
--------------------------              --------------------------
By:  John W. Nagel                      By:  Lester W. B. Moore
     Chief Financial Officer                 Chief Executive Officer


                                       1
#### MAURICE W. GROBER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HERMAN KAHN, *ET ALS.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

*Messrs. Moser, Griffin, Kerby <& Cooper*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Israel B. Greene*and *Mr. Laurence B. Orlof*for the respondent.

April 18, 1967.

Denied.