alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### City of South Miami v. State, *ex rel.*Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and C. M. Ravlin, a *feme sole.*

176 So. 171

Opinion Filed February 4, 1937.

Rehearing Granted March 26, 1937.

Reaffirmed on Rehearing, October 13, 1937.

/. *C.*Sullivan, for Plaintiff in Error;

*Joseph Weintraub,*for Defendant's in Error.

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case was taken from a judgment of ouster rendered in a quo warranto proceeding *126by which the municipality, plaintiff in error here, which contained within its boundaries some two thousand acres of land, was ousted from municipal jurisdiction of forty acres of land, of rural character, which the court below held was beyond the range of municipal benefits, and that its inclusion within the limits of the municipality and its subjection to municipal taxation constituted an invasion of the basic property rights of the co-relator, which are guaranteed by the Constitution.

Upon the trial of the court below the plaintiff in error endeavored to show that these lands were benefited by inclusion within the municipal limits and also endeavored to show that the co-relator was estopped from raising any question of usurpation of municipal authority by acquiescence for an unreasonable length of time.

. The determination of these two issues depended upon the testimony in the case which was taken before the Circuit Judge. We are not able to say that his conclusions from the testimony are clearly erroneous. The case has been ably briefed and orally argued by counsel for both sides, and many interesting questions ‘discussed, but after all the decision of the case turns upon what construction should be placed upon the testimony. The parties waived trial by jury and the case was tried and submitted to the Court for determination of all . question of law and fact. No useful purpose would be subserved in summarizing or analyzing such testimony in this opinion.

Our conclusion is that we would not be authorized to disturb the conclusion of the lower court on the facts as represented by the judgment rendered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Wi-iitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
#### Michael J. Daly, Resp’t, *v.*Joshua C. Sanders, App’lt.

*Daniel Daly,*for resp’t; *Joshua C. Sanders,*for app’lt.'

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Affirming 9 N. Y. State Rep., 794.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.33

                    [LETTERHEAD OF ULTRA MOTORCYCLE COMPANY]



                           EXTENSION OF MATURITY DATE



I, Bill Whalen, hereby extend the maturity date of my amended and restated
promissory note, dated January 27, 2000, in the sum of $156,638, from March 31,
2000, to March 31, 2001.



Date:  12/19/00                              /s/ William P. Whalen
       ----------------                      -----------------------------------
                                             Bill Whalen
#### Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc., by W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7496.

Entry No. 748720.

Pro forma invoice dated Stoke on Trent, England, February 16, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 29, 1946.

*345(Decided December 30, 1947)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in this reappraisement are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that ease was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export value of the merchandise is the value found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar eases to equal the British purchase tax, so-called.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0000525

17-JUL-2013

08:37 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              285
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,800
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of JohnsonDiversey Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                           
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Edward F. Lonergan                    
|                  |  |  |  | Edward F. Lonergan,                       
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  | /s/ Joseph F. Smorada                     
|                  |  |  |  | Joseph F. Smorada,                        
|                  |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connectionwith the quarterly report of Universal City Development Partners, Ltd.(the "Company") and UCDP Finance, Inc. onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 26, 2004 filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Michael J. Short, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|          |                                                                                                                     |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1)  | the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|          |                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2)  | the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |  |  |  |
|----------------------|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Dated:August 9, 2004 |  | By:  /s/Michael J. Short                            Micheal J. Short Principal FinancialOfficer |
|                      |

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section l3(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 12, 2005
    /s/ Charles M. BaughnCharles M. BaughnChief Executive Officer Date: August 12, 2005
    /s/ Sherri W. SchugartSherri W. SchugartChief Financial Officer
City of Harrison

P.O. Box 1715 Jeff Crockett

Harrison, AR 72602 Mayor

Office 870-741-2777 Mayor@CityofHarrison.com

Fax 870-741-0021

September 22, 2011

Ref: Docket DOT-OST-1997-2935 

To: Dennis DeVany

 EAS & Domestic Analysis Division

 Office of Aviation Analysis, X-53

 U.S. Dept. of Transportation

 1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E.

 Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Mr. DeVany,

With regard to the recent proposals concerning the Essential Air Service for Harrison, AR, the City of 

Harrison supports SeaPort Airlines as our selection to provide air service. 

SeaPort Airlines have increased boarding’s by 77% in one year as we continue to work together in 

order to establish air service in our community after an 18 month period with no service. 

In providing Harrison with flights to Memphis and Kansas City we accommodate both our business 

travel to Memphis and leisure travelers with low cost connections in Kansas City. 

Sincerely,

Jeff Crockett

Mayor
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 12



              CALCULATION OF EARNINGS (DEFICIENCY) TO FIXED CHARGES




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        As of December 31
                                                     -------------------------
                                                         2000        1999
                                                           (thousands)
<S>                                                   <C>        <C>
EARNINGS
      Pretax Income (loss)...........................     ($531)     ($2,641)
      Fixed Charges..................................   $27,777      $14,237
      Capitalized Interest...........................  ($24,668)     ($8,438)

      Net Total.....................................     $2,578       $3,158

FIXED CHARGES
      Interest Expense..............................     $2,935      $5,755
      Capitalized Interest..........................    $24,668      $8,438

      Other.........................................       $174         $44
      Total.........................................    $27,777      $14,237
</TABLE>

         The dollar amount of the deficiency of earnings to fixed charges for
         2000 and 1999 (in thousands) was $30,335 and $17,395.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc.
CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES 2000
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004Income available for fixed charges:Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes
    
    $
    (14,392
    )
    
    $
    (2,202
    )
    
    $
    (19,177
    )
    
    $
    1,235
    
    
    $
    (1,892
    )Fixed charges
    
    
    43,990
    
    
    
    38,274
    
    
    
    34,284
    
    
    
    36,124
    
    
    
    34,411$
    29,598
    
    
    $
    36,072
    
    
    $
    15,107
    
    
    $
    37,359
    
    
    $
    32,519Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    43,292
    
    
    $
    37,666
    
    
    $
    33,891
    
    
    $
    35,835
    
    
    $
    33,790Interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    698
    
    
    
    608
    
    
    
    393
    
    
    
    289
    
    
    
    621$
    43,990
    
    
    $
    38,274
    
    
    $
    34,284
    
    
    $
    36,124
    
    
    $
    34,411(a
    )
    
    
    (b
    )
    
    
    (c
    )
    
    
    1.0
    
    
    
    (d
    )
 (a) The Companys earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges for pro forma year ended December 31,2000 by
approximately $14,392. (b) The Companys earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges for pro forma year ended December 31,2001 by
approximately $2,202. (c) The Companys earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges for pro forma year ended December 31,2002 by
approximately $19,177. (d) The Companys earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges for pro forma year ended December 31,2004 by
approximately $1,892.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-2232

___________

Michael Eugene Horlas, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Elizabeth Robinson; Steve Young; *

Heather Brueck; Deborah Nichols; * [UNPUBLISHED]

William Spefslage, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: August 24, 2011

Filed: August 30, 2011

___________

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Michael Eugene Horlas appeals the district court’s1

 order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice. We conclude dismissal

was proper because the district court did not err in holding that Horlas did not comply

with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.
EXHIBIT 32.4

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UCDP FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tracey L. Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 6, 2009



> By:
> 
>                                                                                         
> 
>                                                                                         /s/ Tracey L. StockwellTracey L. Stockwell
> 
>                                                                                             Principal Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v. ORAN J. McADAMS, Sergeant, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

6 USCMA 168, 19 CMR 294

No. 6716

Decided July 15, 1955

*Commander Earl C. Collins,*USN, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander George P. Kurtz,*USN, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

A general court-martial found that the accused Marine had deserted his unit, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 85, 50 USC § 679. The sole issue before us has to do with whether the evidence before the court-martial sufficed to support its finding that the accused’s absence was terminated by apprehension.

The Government’s evidence included extracts from the service record book of the accused in which it was reported that he had been apprehended by civilian authorities on November 5, 1954, and returned to military control three days later. As we observed in United States v. Bennett, 4 USCMA 309, 315, 15 CMR 309, there is “no doubt that following June 19, 1953, a duty has existed in the Marine Corps to record apprehension of deserters in service record books and in the Formal Report.” More recent rulings by us leave no doubt that such evidence suffices to sustain a court-martial’s finding of apprehension. United States v. Simone, 6 USCMA 146, 19 CMR 272; United States v. Lugo, 6 USCMA 151, 19 CMR 277.

Moreover, in the instant case the record of trial reveals unmistakably that the accused and his counsel admitted judicially that he had been apprehended, as that term was used in the specification. Record of Trial, pages 10, 15, 16, 17, 20. Accordingly, the findings and sentence, as approved on intermediate appellate review, must be affirmed.
#### Inter-Ocean Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6624.

Entry No. 748786.

Invoice dated London, England, March 6, 1946.

Certified March 13, 1946.

Entered-at New York, N. Y., March 29, 1946.

(Decided December 16, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olives, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved', and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8558 

To give Presidential Proclamation 9645 the full force and effect of law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Mr. SELF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To give Presidential Proclamation 9645 the full force and 

effect of law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gaza Strip Travel Re5 striction Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION 9645. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date of enact8 ment of this Act, Presidential Proclamation 9645, dated 

9 September 24, 2017 (82 Fed. Reg. 45161), shall have the 

10 full force and effect of law. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8558 IH

1 (b) GAZA STRIP.—For purposes of this Act, individ2 uals residing in the Gaza Strip shall be treated in the same 

3 manner as nationals of countries identified under section 

4 2 of Presidential Proclamation 9645, dated September 24, 

5 2017 (82 Fed. Reg. 45161). 

6 (c) DEFINITION.—In this Act, the term ‘‘Gaza Strip’’ 

7 means the area along the Mediterranean Sea just north8 east of the Sinai Peninsula that was demarcated in the 

9 Egyptian-Israeli armistice agreement of February 24, 

10 1949. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32


Section
1350 Certifications




STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and
Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting officer) of China New Energy Group
Company. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q/A of China New Energy Group Company for the three month period
ended March 31, 2009.





The
undersigned certifies that the reprot fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of China New Energy Group
Company as of March 31, 2009.





This
Certification is executed as of May 24, 2010.





By: /s/Yangkan ChongName:Yangkan ChongTitle
      Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal
      Executive Officer)By: /s/Eric
      TAK Shing YUName: Eric TAK Shing
      YUTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China New Energy Group Company and will be retained by China New Energy Group
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.