alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.5**CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony J. Orlando, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MSW Energy Holdings II LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: October 30, 2006               By: /s/ Anthony J. Orlando Anthony J. Orlando      Chief Executive Officer and President  
48
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Astralis
Ltd. (the "Company"), certifies that:

(1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:  March 29, 2004                     /s/ Mike Ajnsztajn
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Mike Ajnsztajn
                                           Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  March 29, 2004                     /s/ Gina Tedesco
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Gina Tedesco
                                           Chief Financial Officer

      This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
Order entered September 14, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00741-CV

IN RE JOHN CREUZOT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JC-21-00754

ORDER

Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein

Before the Court is relator’s September 2, 2021 motion for leave to file 

amended petition. We GRANT the motion and ORDER relator’s first amended 

petition for writ of mandamus, received on September 2, 2021, filed as of the date 

of this order.

We also request that real parties in interest and respondent file a response, if 

any, to the first amended petition for writ of mandamus by October 4, 2021. 

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
APPENDIX C 

EVOIMAGERY MISSION STATEMENT 
MISSION STATEMENT

EvoImagery, LLC is an innovative consulting firm that integrates the latest available technology 

with photogrammetry and mapping for today’s evolving environment. At EvoImagery we 

develop extremely detailed custom maps and images, and extrapolate valuable information for 

our clients. These images represent features in real-time; a vital asset for industries that face 

changing environments or need exceptionally accurate data.

ABOUT US

Our devoted staff includes a number of professionals who possess backgrounds in engineering,

mining consulting, GIS/geospatial analysis, natural resource management, business, ecology,

state and federal regulations, forestry, botany, wetland science, hydrology, and cultural 

resources/archaeology. Our client base includes only private sector entities distributed across

several states and in different physiographic and geographic regions.

We understand the complicated and delicate situations which may arise when working with 

construction, mining, and natural resources, and we seek to simplify and streamline projects 

to meet our client’s goals, and resolve challenges with efficient, dynamic and pragmatic

solutions. EvoImagery can manage, coordinate, or monitor all stages of a project through 

completion or offer individual services tailored to meet unique requirements. With an 

innovative approach, foresight into tomorrow’s challenges, a passion for our job, and a strong 

commitment to high quality service, we strive to achieve success and provide our clients with 

timely and cost-effective solutions.

(859)-263-4142 P.O. Box 54954

info@evoimagery.com Lexington, KY 40555
SERVICES

EvoImagery provides a variety of services to industries that include: mining, agriculture, 

construction, land development, quarries, real estate, and natural resources. Our multifaceted

and extensive experience facilitates EvoImagery's unique ability to provide customized projects 

based on our client’s needs, enabling them to make informed financial and business decisions, 

identify and mitigate risk, and capitalize on investments. We work hard to understand our 

client’s goals and concerns, and remain current on industry trends and regulatory changes. 

Our comprehensive services include:

MINING SOLUTIONS

• Volumetric Services (stockpile, overburden, yardage placement)

• Monthly Cost Analysis

• Valuation Services

• Active and As-Mined Maps

• Profile and Cross Sections

• Construction Planning

• Refuse Mapping

MAPPING SERVICES

• Aerial Imagery and GIS Analysis

• Topographic/Contour Mapping

• Digital Terrain and Elevation Models

• Land Use Planning and Management

• Digital Orthophotography

• Spatial Analysis

• 3D Imagery

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

• Natural Resource Management and 

Planning

• Regulatory Compliance Services

• Stream Restoration and Mitigation

• Habitat Assessments

• Erosion Monitoring/Coastal Planning

• Archaeological/Cultural Resource 

Services

• Crop Consulting/Agricultural 

Services

"Mapping the Future of Technology"

(859)-263-4142 P.O. Box 54954

info@evoimagery.com Lexington, KY 40555
(Reap. Dec. 8878)

Entry No. 905715.

#### D. Hauser, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided June 25, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:.

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated above consists of electric bulbs imported from Japan.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including the costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised value less the item of buying commission. There was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the appraised value, less the item of buying commission.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8548 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8548

To remove aliens who fail to comply with a release order, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2024

  Mr. Nehls introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To remove aliens who fail to comply with a release order, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accountability Through Deportation 
Act'' or the ``ATD Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF ALIENS WHO FAIL TO COMPLY WITH RELEASE ORDER.

    Section 240(b)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1229a(b)(5)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(F) Failure to comply with release order.--In the 
                case that an immigration officer submits an affidavit 
                to an immigration judge stating that an alien failed to 
                comply with a condition of release under section 
                236(a), such alien shall be ordered removed in 
                absentia.''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATE
                                       FOR
                         RENEWAL AND REVIVAL OF CHARTER
                                       of
                       ROBOTIC SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY, INC.


                  ROBOTIC  SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY,  INC., a corporation  organized
under the laws of Delaware,  the certificate of incorporation of which was filed
in the office of the  Secretary of State on the 26th day of October,  1982,  and
recorded  in the  office of the  Recorder  of Deeds for New Castle  County,  the
charter of which was voided for failure to pay taxes and penalty, now desires to
procure a restoration,  renewal and revival of its charter, and hereby certifies
as follows:

                  FIRST: The name of this corporation is:

                           ROBOTIC SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                  SECOND:  Its  registered  office in the State of  Delaware  is
located at 25 Greystone Manor,  Lewes, DE 19958,  County of Sussex. The name its
registered agent is Harvard Business Services, Inc.

                  THIRD: The date when the restoration,  renewal, and revival of
the charter of this company is to commence is the Twenty-eighth day of February,
1985 same being prior to the date of the expiration of the charter. This renewal
and revival of the charter of this corporation is to be perpetual.

                  FOURTH: This corporation was duly organized and carried on the
business  authorized by its charter  until the First day of March A.D.  1985, at
which time its charter became  inoperative and void for failure to pay taxes and
penalty,  and this  certificate for renewal and revival is filed by authority of
the duly elected directors of the corporation in accordance with the laws of the
State of Delaware.

                  IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, and in compliance with the provisions of
Section 312 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as amended,
providing for the renewal, extension and restoration of charters, Henry Val, the
last and acting  President,  and Isaak Val,  the last and  acting  Secretary  of
ROBOTIC  SYSTEMS &  TECHNOLOGY,  INC.,  have  hereunto  set their  hands to this
certificate this 22nd day of April, 1994.


                                 BY:      HENRY VAL
                                     -------------------------------
                                          Last and Acting President

                                 ATTEST: ISAAK VAL
                                         ---------------------------
                                          Last and Acting Secretary
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com March 19, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Farm Crisp Holding, Inc. Exemption Request Under

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and

Reform Act of 2012 , 4 9 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or M adam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

, 49

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Farm Crisp Holdings, Inc. (Farm Crisp), an

agricultural imaging service company and operator of small Unmanned Aircraft System s

( s UAS), seeks an exemption from the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

to allow commercial operation of the DJI Spreading Wings S900 (S900) within the

National Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low

- risk, precision agricultural aerial

mapping and surveying

.

Farm Crisp, in the accompanying petition, see ks exemption from the requirements of

14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 91.121

, 91.151(b)

, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ),and 91.417(a) and (b)

.

Farm Crisp has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition

because it would not set a precedent and because the relief requested is identical to

exemptions granted previously. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. See Exemption Nos. 11109, 11110,

11114, 11136, 11166, 11167, 11170, 11172, 11177, 11185 11192, 11193, and 11195.

In addition, Farm Crisp will be utilizing the s ame DJI proven technologies the FAA has

already s crutinized and approved for fourteen (14) other Section 333 exemptions.

Moreover, Farm Crisp provides an enhanced level of safety over other approved uses of

DJI products in that, the proposed precision agriculture operations occur over specific

remote fields in rural areas.

Finally, Farm Crisp’s package accompanying the Section 333 P etition for E xemption is

robust, thorough

, and comprehensive

, and along with the published S900 User’s Manual,UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com A2 Flight Control System User Manual, and Ground Station Wireless Data

- link User

manual, includes the Farm Crisp Flight Operations and Procedures Manual, Safety

Management Systems Manual, Maintenance Manual, and Aircrew Training Program

.

All of the appropriate documentation to accompany Farm Crisp’s Section 333 Petition is

included. Combined, this comp rehensive package, the approvals the FAA has already

given to DJI products and th e te chnology, should provide the support necessary to the

FAA for a summary grant of Farm Crisp’s Section 333 Petition and expedite the process.

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Jim Williams

J o e Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.
No. 56522.

protests 154824-K, etc. (New York).

#### Borden & Riley Paper Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Dear Sirs: 

PO Box 235, Sidney, New York 13838 

(607)563-3777 

www.airservice.net 

1•-: 

1_,,, 

.-···· ', . ., 

:. ') -·'-· 

U· Reference to docket number FAA-2011-1316 please extend this exemption. Enclosed copies may be 

useful 
/ 

. 1 

./Inquiries 

.-Number ' . 1

serial Number 

Name 

Make/Model 

Engine Reference 

Dealer 

Document Index 

State and County 

Territory and Country 

Pending I Expired I 

Canceled Registration 

Reports 

N-number Availability 

Request a Reserved NNumber: 

- Online 

- In Writing 

Reserved N-Number 

·Renewal 

- Online 

Request for Aircraft 

Records 

- Online 

Help 

Main Menu 

Aircraft Registration 

Aircmft Downloadable 

Database 

Definitions 

N-Number Format 

Registrations at Risk 

Contact Aircraft 

Registration 

FAA REGISTRY 

N-Number Inquiry Results 

N9384A is Assigned 

Data Updated each Federal Working Day at Midnight 

Serial Number 

Manufacturer Name 

Model 

Type Aircraft 

Pending Number 

Change 

Date Change 

Authorized 

MFRYear 

Name 

Street 

City 

County 

Country 

\.... 

HEW SEARCH 

Aircraft Description 

7526 Type 

Registration 

CESSNA 

Certificate 

Issue Date 

Corporation 

04/30/2009 

195A Expiration Date 06/30/2011 

Fixed Wmg Single- Status 

Engine 

515BF Type Engine 

02/12/2010 Dealer 

1950 ModeS Code 

Fractional 

Owner 

Registered Owner 

DELAWARE AVIATION LLC 

POBOX235 

State 

Valid 

Reciprocating 

No 

53203106 

NO 

NEW YORK SIDNEY 

DELAWARE 

UNITED STATES 

Zip Code 13838-0235 

Airworthiness 

Engine Manufacturer JACOBS Classification Standard 

Engine Model L4/R755 ... 7 Category None 

A/W Date 05/18/1956 
-. .... ·--· .. ·-· 

Date: 07/01/2013 Exemption No: 10403 from 14 CFR (FAR Section)· Part: 

120 

will expire on 12131/2013, If appropriate, please submit 

your request to extend this exemption (including the 

docket number FAA-2011-1316) within 30 days ofthe 

date of this notice. OtheJWise, the FAA may not be able 

to process your request for extension before the 

expiration date. You may either submit your request 

electronically through the internet using the Docket 

Management System web site at: 

http://Regulations.gov/ or mail your request to: 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Bernard Ford 

Delaware Aviation LLC 

POBox 235 

Sidney, NY 

13838 

Submission to other iocations may delay processing. 

Any request for extension must meet the 

requirements of 14 CFR part 11. If you have already . 

requested an extension for this exemP.tion or no longer · l 

need this exemption, please ignore '*Jtiij\i JIJitliiJl JlfllJiniillllmiJpJuljji 

I
#### ALBERT HODES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. OAK FLOORING COMPANY, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER.

April 13, 1964. Granted.

See same case below: 82 N. *J. Super.*216.

*Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell & Foley*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Herman M. Wilson*for the respondent.

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.
No. 53634.

protests 138727-K, etc. (New York).

#### Commodity Credit Corporation et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR03-11-005]


Enbridge Pipelines (Louisiana Intrastate) LLC; Notice of 
Compliance Filing

March 16, 2007.

    Take notice that on March 5, 2007, Enbridge Pipelines (Louisiana 
Intrastate) LLC filed its annual revision of the fuel percentage on its 
system pursuant to section 3.2 of its Statement of Operating 
Conditions. Louisiana Intrastate seeks an effective date of April 1, 
2007.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#561013041519383a3f383305232626392422163033243578313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c98f8c9b8a86a7a5a0a7ac9abcb9b9a6bbbd89afacbbaae7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 27, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-5202 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>