alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Summit Financial Services Group, Inc. (the
Company), for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven C. Jacobs, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven C. Jacobs                                
|Steven C. Jacobs                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 15, 2007
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier: 20**  **11**

**- NM** 
**- 141** 

**- AD** 

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### Charles H. Roosevelt, *v.*The Village of New Rochelle.

Motion denied, without costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8425 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8425

  To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
revise a rule relating to language translation assistance with respect 
         to certain needs assessments, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2024

  Ms. Caraveo (for herself and Mr. Valadao) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
revise a rule relating to language translation assistance with respect 
         to certain needs assessments, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Language 
Accessibility Act''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION WITH RESPECT TO LANGUAGE TRANSLATION ASSISTANCE 
              AT SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTERS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall 
revise section 130.330(a) of title 13, Code of Federal Regulations, to 
require that a needs assessment performed by a small business 
development center (as defined in section 3 of the Small Business Act 
(15 U.S.C. 632)) includes a determination with respect to whether 
language translation assistance at such center is necessary.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

April 5, 2006 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LEONARD J. YOUNG

Automatic Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals

Criminal Court for Shelby County

Nos. 00-04017, 00-04018, 00-04019 

Joseph B. Dailey, Presiding Judge; Jon Kerry Blackwood, Special Judge

No. W2002-03012-SC-DDT-DD - Filed on June 30, 2006

ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in the conclusion of the majority that Young's convictions should be affirmed. As

to the sentence of death, however, I respectfully dissent. I continue to adhere to my view that the

comparative proportionality review protocol currently embraced by the majority is inadequate to

shield defendants from the arbitrary and disproportionate imposition of the death penalty. See State

v. Reid, 164 S.W.3d 286, 323-325 (Tenn. 2005)(Birch, J., concurring and dissenting), and cases cited

therein. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion affirming the

imposition of the death penalty in this case.

_______________________________

ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR.
p. 1 

3M Environmental, Health and 3M Center, Building 0224-05-W-03 

Safety Operations St. Paul, MN 55144-10©Q 

cA P1=-2& '~0 l/a 

Aprtl 27, 2011 

Federal Express 

Director, Chemical Control Division (74USIVl) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

Room 4146 EPA East 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington,. DO 20460 

Attention: Docket No. OPPT 24Q4-0112 

PFOA Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program 

33 5047, 

 `. ; 1, C : 30 ; 

Subject; Status Report Pursuant to the Memorandurn of Understanding between 

and 3M Company and Dyneon LLO dated October 2004 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

On November 19, 2Q09, U.S. EPA approved the Phase 3 Work Plan under the subject 

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Accordingly, and per the AtIOU, 311!I and 

Dyneon have resumed the submittal of quarterly status reports . Enclosed for your 

information and records are two paper copies of the January 1 to March 31, 2011 report 

(one includes a copy of the raw data) and one electronic version that has been copied to 

a CD (also including the raw data). 

Two paper copies of the report (one with a copy of the raw data) and a CD (also 

including the raw data) have also been sent to the referenced docket as noted in the cc 

list below. 

If there are any questions or comments. concerning this matter, please contact me at 652 

737-357a. 

Gary Fohenstein. 

Mandger; Environmental & Regulatory Affairs 

Environmental, Health, and Safety Operations 

3M - Building 224-5W-Q3 

St. Paul, MN 55 144 

651737-3570 

henstein&=m.com CONTAINS NO CP! 
cc: Gloria Davis - Mail Code 7405M (w/o attachments) 

T3CA Confidential .Business Infixmation Center ("~~0,7M) 

EPA East --Room6425-Attn: EPA-HQ-t)PP'F 2t04-0I l 2 

1 .201 Constitution. Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 2(1004-3302 

Glencta Dean y- Alabama Department of Environmental Management, 

Enclosures 

CONTAINS NJ Cei
Case No. 8,518.

#### In re LOTHROP.

[5 Law Rep. 456.]

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Dec., 1842.

Bankruptcy — Application ron Discharge — Objections by Creditors — Right to Trial by Jurt.

The only remedy of a bankrupt, where a majority in number and interest of his creditors file their written dissent to his discharge, is to demand a trial by jury.

This matter came up for a hearing upon the bankrupt’s application for a discharge. A majority in number and value of the creditors who had proved their debts appeared to resist the application, and file their dissent in writing. A hearing was sought by the bankrupt [George W. Lothrop] before the judge alone, and a preliminary question arose as to his rights under the fourth section of the act [of 1841 (5 Stat. 443)], which provides ‘'that if, in case of bankruptcy, a majority, in number and value, of the creditors who shall have proved their debts at the time of hearing of the peition,” &e., “shall at such hearing file their written dissent to the allowance of a discharge and certificate to such bankrupt, or if, upon such hearing, a discharge shall not be granted to him, the bankrupt may demand a trial by jury upon a proper issue to be directed by the court at such time and place and in such manner as the court may order; or he may appeal from that decision,” &c., “to the circuit court.”

George Alexander Smith, for bankrupt,

contended that he had a right to be heard in the first instance by the court, and, in case a discharge was refused, then to demand a jury, or appeal to the circuit court.

Charles Theodore Russell, for creditors.

SPRAGUE, District Judge,

after remarking that the provision was not free from obscurity, decided, that where a majority in number and value of the creditors file their written dissent to the bankrupt’s discharge, the only alternative left to him is to acquiesce in that dissent, or demand a trial by-jury; in other words, that the only mode of trying the issue between the bankrupt and the opposing creditors is by jury, and that he is not entitled in this case to be heard by the court, and then, in case of a refusal to grant a discharge, demand a trial by jury, or appeal to the circuit court. This case was accordingly ordered to be heard by a jury.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ GERD TOPSNIK, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________
2016

- 2405

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:14

- cv

- 00275

- EDK, Judge Elaine Kaplan.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
C HARLES H. M AGNUSON , Law Offices of Charles Ma gnuson, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff

- appellant.

A NTHONY T. S HEEHAN , Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by R ICHARD F ARBER , C AROLINE D. C IRAO LO

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK , B RYSON , and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 5, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 02 2

- 3090

_____________________________ A NTHONY A. P OLLY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Devin D. Collier
, Judge

. January 5, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kevin P. Steiger
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Ge neral
, and Kristie Regan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 108 (Monday, June 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 32388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13920]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7486]

Determination and Waiver Relating to Assistance for the 
Independent States of the Former Soviet Union

    Determination and Waiver of Section 7073(a) of the Department of 
State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
2010 (Div. F, Pub. L. 111-117), as carried forward under the Full-Year 
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub. L. 112-10) (``the 
Act'') Relating to Assistance for the Independent States of the Former 
Soviet Union.
    Pursuant to the authority vested in me as Deputy Secretary of 
State, including by section Section 7073(a) of the Department of State, 
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. 
F, Pub. L. 111-117), as carried forward under the Full-Year Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub. L. 112-10) (``the Act''), 
Executive Order 13118 of March 31, 1999, and State Department 
Delegation of Authority No. 245-1, I hereby determine that it is in the 
national security interest of the United States to make available funds 
appropriated under the heading ``Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and 
Central Asia'' of the Act, without regard to the restriction in section 
7073(a).
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.

     Dated: May 23, 2011.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-13920 Filed 6-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-23-P
```
Copyright © 1997 Global Compliance, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Basics

Case No: 12-008-U - Flint Creek Retrofit Date Entered: 03/08/2012 08:18:22 AM

Party/Requestor: APSC Staff Date Received: 03/07/2012

Date Requested: 03/07/2012 Internal Due Date: 03/20/2012

Service Due Date: 03/22/2012

Answer Status: New Service Date:

Question No: 18

Please identify the 8,200 MW of coal-fired generation that have installed SCR systems 

since 2004. For each coal unit at which SCR was installed, please provide:

a. Specific type of SCR system installed

b. Year installation complete

c. Project cost

Answer:

Refer to "APSC Staff 4-18 Attachment 1.xls" for a list of the plants included in the 8,200 

MW of coal-fired generation that have installed SCR systems since 2004, and the 

associated requested information.

Advanced

Date Verified: Date Accepted:

Confidential: No

Yes

Attachments:

Voluminous: No

Yes

Highly Sensitive: No

Yes

Comments:

Preparer(s): Henry C Steele; Kevin J Munson; Michael L 

Wilkinson; Twana Banks-Smith; William E Mast

Witness: Christian T Beam

Modification History

Created by Twana Banks-Smith Created on 03/14/2012 02:12:51 PM Modified on 03/15/2012 04:27:03 PM

Edit History

1. Twana Banks-Smith 03/15/2012 04:27:03 PM

0. Twana Banks-Smith 03/14/2012 02:13:22 PM

 
Copyright © 1997 Global Compliance, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
---

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-45744 dated April 27, 2004) pertaining
to the Amended 1999 Stock Option Plan of Destiny Media Technologies Inc. of our
report dated October 21, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Destiny Media Technologies Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) for the year ended August 31, 2005.

|Vancouver, Canada | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|----------------- | ---------------------
|November 29, 2005 |                      
|                  | Chartered Accountants

---
#### Mary Schmittler, *Appellant, v.*Adam Simon, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Davis, P. J.
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8641 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 401 Main Street in Brawley, California, as 

the ‘‘Walter Francis Ulloa Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 8641 RFS

1 SECTION 1. WALTER FRANCIS ULLOA MEMORIAL POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 401 Main Street in Brawley, 

5 California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Walter 

6 Francis Ulloa Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Walter Francis Ulloa 

11 Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
---

Exhibit 23.1

| | RSM Richter Chamberland
S.E.N.C.R.L./LLPComptables agréésChartered Accountants2, Place Alexis Nihon Montréal (Québec) H3Z 3C2 Téléphone /
Telephone: 514.934.3400 Télécopieur / Facsimile: 514.934.3408
www.rsmrch.com
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of IntelGenx Technologies Corp. of our report
dated March 29, 2010 relating to our audits of the financial statements of
IntelGenx Technologies Corp. (Formerly Big Flash Corporation) as of and for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of IntelGenx Technologies Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2009.

RSM Richter Chamberland LLP (Signed)

Chartered AccountantsMontreal, Canada March 30,
2010

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, MichaelCarlson, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AES Ironwood, L.L.C. (the “registrant”);

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and have:

 

a.               designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.              evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand  presented           in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,                               as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a.               Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal        control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s            ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: March 24, 2005

 
|   | / s/   Michael Carlson             |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |  Name:   Michael Carlson |
|   |  Chief Financial Officer           |

 

----
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T G R E G O R Y S Y L V E S T E R R I D E A U , J R ., P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. L A R R Y S M A L L , W a r d e n ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 56216 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 9 - c v - 0 0 5 3 5 - W - PCL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia T hom a s J . W he l an, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G reg o ry S yl v est er R i d eau , Jr. , a C al i fo rn i a st at e p ri so n er, ap p eal s p ro se f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng de l i be r a t e i ndi f

f e r e nc e t o s e r i ous m e di c a lne e ds . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ad is m is s a l f o rf a ilu r e to s ta te ac la im , B arre n



# FI LED OC T 12 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 56216 2 v . H arr i ngton , 1 5 2 F .3 d1 1 9 3 , 1 1 9 4 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 8 ) ( o r d e r ) , an df o rf a ilu r e to e x h au s t, W

y at t v . T e rhune , 3 1 5 F. 3 d1 1 0 8 , 1 1 1 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed the cl ai m thatdefe nd ant s deni ed R i deau a therapeut i c m edi ca l di etbenefi ci alfor hi s heartcond i t i on because an i n m at e’ s d i sag reem en tw i th h i s p h ysi ci an s o r p ri so n o ffi ci al s reg ard i n g th e co u rse o f tr e a tm e n t d o e s n o t c o n s titu te d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e to s e r io u s m e d ic a l n e e d s . Se e T oguc hiv . Chung , 3 9 1 F .3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed the cl ai m thatdefe nd ant s deni ed R i de au s i ngl e c e l l s t a tus a nd othe rtr e a tm e ntf orhi s s l e e p di s or de rbe c aus e , a s he appears t o con ce de on appeal , R i deau di d n otexhausthi s a dm i ni strat i ve re m edi es a s to th is c la im b e f

o r e f ilin g s u it. See M

cKi nn eyv. Carey , 311 F . 3d 1198, 1199 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( per c uri am ) ( re qu i ri ng di sm i ss alw i tho utprej ud i ce w here pri soner d o e s n o t e x h au s t h is a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s p r io rto f ilin g s u it) . R i deau’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s, i ncl ud i ng tho se concerni ng a c l ai m un der the A m er i cans w i th D i sabi l i t i es A ctthathe tri ed t o al l ege, ar e unp er suas i ve. AF F I RME D.