alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Transport Airplane Directorate

1601 Lind Avenue SW

Renton, Washington 98057-3356

Mr. Chris Heck

Staff Engineer

Engineering & Air Safety Department

Air Line Pilots Association International

535 Herndon Parkway

P.O. Box 1169

Herndon, VA 20172-1169

August 7, 2013

Dear Mr. Heck:

Thank you for your comments to Docket No. FAA-2013-0317 regarding the final Special 

Conditions No. 25-487-SC for Airbus Model A330-200 airplanes on the subject of the 

installation of bulk cargo lower deck crew rest compartments. The following addresses 

your specific concerns.

You comment that it is possible that a fully loaded service cart could be parked over the 

escape hatch. The special conditions requires the escape hatch be assessed with a 95th

percentile male standing on the hatch, as this was determined to be the worst-case 

scenario. The 95th percentile male creates a concentrated load directly on the hatch, 

whereas a cart’s weight is distributed over a much larger area which will only be partially

on the hatch.

You comment that the warning system should include a visual alarm as well as an audible 

alarm. The special conditions specifically require an audible alarm, while the existing 

regulations cover items such as emergency lighting and automatically presented oxygen 

masks. The required emergency lighting and oxygen masks act as visual indicators of an 

emergency, making an additional visual indicator unnecessary.

You comment that the effect of turbulence on an aft location in the airplane for the crew 

rest makes it difficult to egress up stairs or ladders and creates difficulties in return of 

captain or relief pilots to the flight deck in an emergency. The FAA never assumes that a 

crew member who is resting in the cabin or in a dedicated crew rest area must be able to 

make it to the flight deck in an emergency during severe turbulence. The location of the 

crew rest in this case is an operational and design consideration. The egress safety issues 

are considered during the certification process, and testing is done to show that the 

occupants of the crew rest can safety evacuate in the event of an in-flight emergency.
We find the final special conditions and the existing regulatory requirements adequately 

address your comments. We have not changed the special conditions in this regard.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey E. Duven

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate

Aircraft Certification Service
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE PUBLIC ACCOUNTING REFORM AND INVESTOR

PROTECTION ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aeolus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), Richard P. Burgoon, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and
Michael P. McManus, Chief Accounting Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results
of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its
staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report
to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.



/S/ RICHARD P. BURGOON, JR.Richard P. Burgoon, Jr.Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)August 3, 2005/S/ MICHAEL P. MCMANUSMichael P. McManusChief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and SecretaryAugust 3, 2005
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of World
Moto, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

| | Date: April 15, 2015                                   
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                        
| | By: /s/ Lisa
      Ziomkowski-Boten                    
| | Name: Lisa
      Ziomkowski-Boten                      
| | Title: Treasurer
      (Principal Financial Officer and
| | Principal                                              
| | Accounting Officer)                                    

---
Supreme Court, General Term—First Department.

Filed January 24, 1890.

#### Arthur Furber, App’lt, v. Alex. L. McCarthy *et al.,*Resp’ts.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### Humble Oil & Refining Company *v.*Koppenheffer et ux., Appellants.

Argued May 28, 1969.

Before Bell, C. J., Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*637
      *John J. Krafsig,*for appellants.

*James 11. Stewart, Jr.,*with him *Nauman, Smith, Shissler and Hall,*for appellee.

*Joseph E. Pappano,*and *Pappano and Pappano,*for appellee.

October 9, 1969:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Decree affirmed, each party to pay own costs.

Mr. Justice Jones took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-182-001]


Honeoye Storage Corporation; Notice of Proposed Substitute Change 
in FERC Gas Tariff

March 28, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 26, 2007, Honeoye Storage Corporation 
(Honeoye) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume 1A, four (4) substitute revised tariff sheets to be 
effective April 1, 2007. The substitute revised tariff sheets are 
designated as:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 74
Substitute Original Sheet No. 99A
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 100
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 106

    Honeoye states that copies of the filing are being mailed to those 
parties who have filed motions to intervene in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dc9a998e9f93b2b0b5b2b98fa9acacb3aea89cbab9aebff2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82c4c7d0c1cdeceeebece7d1f7f2f2edf0f6c2e4e7f0e1ace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6104 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Winton Series.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                       
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                         
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                          
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                              
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 7, 2008
#### The People *ex rel.*Libbie E. Healey, App’lt, *v.*Commissioners of Excise, Resp’t.

Disbursements allowed on settlement of order.
Order entered November 5, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00560 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00561 - CR PATRICK LEE BULLOCK, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 199 - 81610 - 2013 ; 199 - 81611 - 2013



### O RDER Appellant’s November 3, 2014 third motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief is GRANTED . Appellant’s brief received by the Clerk of the Court on November 3, 2014 is DEEME D timely filed on the date of this order. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.34




December 1, 2000


Mr. P. Andrew Shaw
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
250 S. Australian Avenue, 9th Floor
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

RE:  PROPOSED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Dear Andy:

US Diagnostic Inc. ("Company") wishes to outline the basic terms of its
understanding with you regarding changes to your employment arrangement.

The following represents an outline of those terms and, by executing a copy of
this letter, you agree that the parties may enter into a separate employment
agreement which would encompass these terms and conditions if so required by the
Company:

1.   COMPENSATION - Your current compensation including car allowance and
     benefits will remain the same. You will continue to be eligible for bonuses
     at the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors.

2.   TERM - The term of this arrangement will be one year from the effective
     date of January 5, 2001.

3.   TERMINATION/RETENTION PAYMENT - In the event the Company terminates your
     employment (including the planned one year term), other than for cause as
     defined in your current employment agreement, the Company will pay to you
     an amount equal to six (6) months of your current base compensation of
     $150,000 per year, or a total payment of $75,000. In the event such
     termination is prior to the term, you will be entitled to both the
     termination payment and the remaining balance of your employment agreement
     payable on or before January 5, 2002.

4.   SPECIAL TERMINATION - In the event any entity, other than the Company with
     which USD currently is having discussions, merges with or becomes owner of
     the Company after March 1, 2001, you will be eligible for the provision set
     forth in #3 of this Letter Agreement (Termination/Retention Payment). In
     such event, you will be entitled to both the termination payment and
     remaining balance of your employment regardless of whether or not there is
     an offer of employment.

5.   EXISTING AGREEMENT. The above terms and conditions are not intended to
     alter the current employment agreement that presently exists and all
     obligations the Company presently has as outlined in the Proxy Statement,



<PAGE>   2

     as well as the memorandum to the Board regarding retention bonus payments,
     will not be affected. Your existing employment agreement dated January 27,
     2000 is extended until January 5, 2002, and the provisions of this letter
     agreement are incorporated therein except the following paragraphs of the
     employment agreement are deleted: 3, and 5.

We look forward to working together with you in completing the strategic plan of
the Company.

Very truly yours,


US DIAGNOSTIC INC.



By: /s/ Joseph A. Paul
   -----------------------------
   Joseph A. Paul
   President

AGREED TO AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY:

/s/ P. Andrew Shaw
--------------------------------
P. Andrew Shaw
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-1228 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DOUBLE TAXATION 

Taxes on Income 

 Protocol Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the NETHERLANDS 

Amending the Convention of December 18, 1992 

Signed at Washington March 8, 2004 

with 

Exchange of Notes with 

Attached Understanding 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 NETHERLANDS 

 Double Taxation: Taxes on Income 

Protocol amending the convention of December 18, 1992. 

Signed at Washington March 8, 2004; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate July 16, 2004 (Treaty Doc. 108-25, 

 108th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 November 17, 2004; 

Ratified by the President December 17, 2004; 

Exchange of Diplomatic Notes at Washington 

 September 17 and December 28, 2004; 

Entered into force December 28, 2004. 

With exchange of notes with attached understanding. 



















1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Phillip Glover, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 285]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree. We decline to modify the judgment by reducing the conviction to attempted robbery in the second degree *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]; *People v Mierzwa,*124 AD2d 1038, *lv denied*69 NY2d 714). Further, we conclude that the jury verdict rejecting the defense of insanity is not contrary to the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495).

Although the prosecutor improperly elicited testimony concerning defendant’s post-arrest silence by asking a prosecution witness whether defendant had refused to sign a written statement *(see, People v Hollis,*215 AD2d 777; *People v Falk,*185 AD2d 630, *Iv denied*80 NY2d 929), the trial court promptly delivered strong and unequivocal curative instructions that effectively eliminated any prejudice to defendant *(see, People v Arce,*42 NY2d 179, 187; *People v Blair,*148 AD2d 767, 768, *Iv denied*74 NY2d 661). There is no merit to defendant’s remaining alleged instances of prosecutorial misconduct.

The court erred in directing defendant’s psychiatric expert to prepare a written report of his findings and to disclose that report to the prosecution *(see, People v Daly,*186 AD2d 217, *lv denied*81 NY2d 787; *Matter of Mulvaney v Dubin,*80 AD2d 566, *revd on other grounds*55 NY2d 668). However, proof of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming and the error was harmless *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242; *People v Daly, supra).*

The cumulative effect of those errors did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. We have reviewed the remaining contentions of defendant and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, McCarthy, J.—Attempted Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134806 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134806 COA: 267374 Ingham CC: 05-000330-FC MICHAEL FREDERICK CHRISTLE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2007

Clerk
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40342

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

THOMAS JAMES ROACH,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:93-CR-114-1

--------------------

February 19, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Thomas James Roach, Federal prisoner number 04449-078, was

convicted in 1994 for possession with intent to distribute

cocaine and is serving a 150-month term of imprisonment. Roach

has appealed the district court’s order denying his motion under 

FED. R. CRIM. P. 35(b) for a downward departure. 

Resentencing under FED. R. CRIM. P. 35(b) is permitted only

on the Government’s motion. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d
No. 02-40342

-2-

140, 141 (5th Cir. 1994). Because Roach’s motion was

unauthorized, the district court did not have jurisdiction. See

id. at 142. Although the district court considered the motion on

its merits, it should have denied the motion for lack of

jurisdiction. See id. On that alternative basis, the district

court’s order is

AFFIRMED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2610

_____________________________
D EAVIS N ATHANIEL S AULSBERRY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circui t Court for Escambia County

. J. Scott Duncan , Judge

. September 25, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and R OWE , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.33 0 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Deavis Nathaniel Saulsberry, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.