alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 13, 2010

Mr. David C. Warren 2201 Gleghorn West Plains, MO 65775

Dear Mr. Warren:

This is in response to your October 20, 2006 letter (public docket No. FAA-2006-25494) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (F AA) for reconsideration of your request for relief from § 65.91(c)(2) of Title 14, Code of Fe deral Regulations (CFR). An exemption, if granted, would have enabled you to be eligible for an Inspection Authorization (IA) without being actively engaged in maintaining aircraft for at least the two years before application.

You originally petitioned for exemption on July 21, 2006 and the FAA denied your request. In Denial of Exemption No. 8771, the FAA referenced two other denials of exemption from § 65.91(c)(2) and determined that your circumstances were similar in all material respects to those in the denials. We further emphasized that the relevant issue leading to our decision was not the overall maintenance experience, but rather the two consecutive years of maintenance experience required to be eligible for renewal of your IA.

With more than two consecutive years of maintenance experience, you should now be able to apply for an IA. As such, an exemption is not longer needed. We will take no further action on your petition for reconsideration.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brent Bales, the Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the managing owner of The Frontier Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of The Frontier Fund.



/s/ Brent BalesBrent BalesChief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier FundMay 15, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or any other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The Frontier Fund and will be retained by The
Frontier Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v KENNETH M. JACOBS, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

18 USCMA 369, 40 CMR 81

No. 21,913

May 23, 1969

*Captain Frank A. Nelson,*JAGC, USN, and *Lieutenant Commander E. M. Fulton, Jr.,*JAGC, USN, were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Captain Charles E. Patterson,*USMCR, was on the pleadings for Ap-pellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

For the reasons set forth in United States v Wright, 18 USCMA 348, 40 CMR 60, we here find no fault in *370the president’s instructions on sentencing as to matters that “logically” lend themselves to either the adjudging of a more severe sentence or a more lenient one.

We affirm the decision of the board of review.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

FERGUSON, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in United States v Wright, 18 USCMA 348, 40 CMR 60.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Christopher Naughton, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Marshall Edwards, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) ) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within the entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared:  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of this disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 9, 2005 /s/ Christopher Naughton   Christopher Naughton        Chief Executive Officer
---

**Exhibit 32.1** **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** I, Steven Vestergaard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
    1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
    that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Destiny Media Technologies, Inc.
    for the year ended August 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
    and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of Destiny Media Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") By:
      /s/ Steve VestergaardName:
      STEVEN VESTERGAARDTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
      November 29, 2005 *This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
    and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form
    10-KSB. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company
    and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
    Commission or its staff upon request.* *This certification accompanies this Annual Report on
    Form 10-KSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
    shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the
    Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 10934,
    as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be
    deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
    Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
    Company specifically incorporates it by reference.*


---
U.S

. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration



## MAR 27 2015

Mr. Jarred Gentile Certification Manager, Aircraft Engineering Gogo, LLC 1250 N. Arlington Heights Rd. Itasca, IL 60 143

Dear Mr. Gentile: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue , S

.W

. Renton , Washington 98057-3356

The FAA has received your petition via e-mail March 13, 2015, requesting an extension to the time limit for exemption from the requirements ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.571(e)(l). Exemption no. 10817 allows installation ofKa Band radomes on Boeing Model 767 airplanes that do not meet FAA bird-strike-damage tolerance requirements

. Your petition has been uploaded to docket no. FAA-2013-0562 in regulations.gov. We are in the process ofreviewing your extension request, and will contact you ifwe need additional information. The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary ofthe petition in the Federal Register for public comment because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, no public comments were received on the original petition, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Gogo fleet operations. Ifyou have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Todd Martin at 425-227-1178, or e-mail todd.martin@faa.gov. Sincerely,

Mark Forseth Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service Federal Aviation Administration
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Steven H. Kane, Chief Executive Officer of Protalex, Inc. (the "Registrant"),
do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 13a-l4(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code that:

(1) the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31,
2005 (the "Report"), to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Dated: August 26, 2005                  By: /s/ Steven H. Kane
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Steven H. Kane
                                            Chief Executive Officer
No. 40237.

#### Protests 888977-G, etc., of Manealoff & Co., Inc., et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Dallingbr, J.

Following the authorities cited in -Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
2

cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge Felton L. Matthews, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A
Order entered March 1, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00970
- CV
KESHA TERRY , Appellant

V. ROSEMARY INCENCIO, ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 68th Ju dicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 10849

O RDER
We REINSTATE this appeal. By order dated January 5, 2021, we abated this appeal and ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing and make written findings as to whether he arings were conducted on eight specified dates and, if so, whether a record was made of those hearings. A supplemental clerk’s record with the trial court’s findings has been
filed.The trial court found that hearings on the following four dates were

reco rded: (1) March 11, 2019; (2) June 15, 2020; (3) October 12, 2020; and (4) November 9, 2020. The reporter’s records from these four hearings have been
filed. The case was set for hearings on the motions docket on February 25, 2019, March 29, 2019, May 13 , 2019, May 17, 2019, and June 17, 2019. These hearings were cancelled and no record was taken. On April 29, 2019, the case was set on the dismissal docket. The trial court granted a default judgment on that date . No record of the proceeding was made. The trial court noted in its findings that it is the regular practice to not have a record of dismissal docket proceedings unless requested by a party.
We ADOPT the trial court’s findings. The appellate record is now complete. Accordingly, appellant sha ll file her
brief on the merits within thirty days of the date of this order.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Hani Hafiz Ibrahim Qutiefan v. Lubna Aziz Safi

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00425

- CV

Trial court case number: 13

- DCV

- 206211

Trial court: 505th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, Hani Hafiz Ibrahim Qutiefan, has filed a motion requesting a one

- year extension to file a reply brief, to stay any hearings or rulings from this Court, and to cancel

submission of this case. A ppellant fi led his brief on July 11, 2019. Appellee, Lubna Aziz Safi, filed her brief on October 11, 2019. Appellant’s reply brief, if any, was due on October

3 1, 2019. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(c) (“A reply brief, if any, must be filed within 20 days after

the date the a ppellee’s brief was filed.”). Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion.

A ppellant has also filed a letter

- notice stating that he filed for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court in Houston, Texas, and request ed an automatic stay. “A bankruptcy sus pends the appeal and all periods in these rules from the date when the bankruptcy petition is filed until the appellate court reinstates or severs the appeal in
accordance with federal law.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2. However, appellant’s notice is deficient.

Te xas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.1 provides, “Any party may file a notice that a party is in bankruptcy. The notice must contain: (a) the bankrupt party’s name; (b) the court in which the bankruptcy proceeding is pending; (c) the bankruptcy proceeding’s s tyle and case number; and (d) the date when the bankruptcy petition was filed.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.1.

Appellant’s notice of bankruptcy does not comply with Rule 8.1. Although appellant states, “I filed bankruptcy in the US bankruptcy court of Downtown HOUS TON, TEXAS,” this does not identify the bankrupt party’s name or the name of the court in which the bankruptcy proceeding was filed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.1(a), (b). Nor does appellant’s notice state the style and case number of the bankruptcy proceeding or th e date when the bankruptcy petition was filed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.1(c), (d). Accordingly, we strike2

appellant’s notice. Appellant shall immediately file a notice that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.1 so this Court can abate this appeal.

I t is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___ January 28, 2020

_____
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*John Ross, *Appellant, v.*Hubert O. Thompson, *Commissioner of Public Works, Respondent.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12


                                 Andrea S. Lisi

                                 3738 Savoy Lane

                                    Apt. C-2

                           West Palm Beach, Fl. 33417

                                 (561) 712-9730



October 13, 2000




Incubate This!, Inc.

265 Sunrise Avenue

Suite 204

Palm Beach, Fl.  33480



RE:  Support Services
     ----------------



Gentlemen:


         For a total consideration of 1,500 shares of the common stock of
Incubate This!, Inc., I agree to render support services to the Company for a
period of ninety (90) days commencing as of this date.

         Please issue the certificate in the name of Andrea S. Lisi.



                                                  Very truly,


                                                  Andrea S. Lisi
No. 54760.

#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 127341-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Nov , 14 . 200 8 12;28P M michae l a , pizz i j r , " \ 430 1 P . 2

V • FA A PAR T 1 6 AlHPOR T PROCEEPING S DOCKE T FEDERAL AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D C

Docket No . 16-08-0 5 ALCA , Inc. , Cylinde r

Shop , Inc. , Suncoas t Aviation , Aircraf

t Part s an dNationa l Aviation ,

Complainants , vs . Miami-Dad e County , Florid a

Respondent . / 

# COP Y

UNOPPOSED MOTIO N FO REXTENSIO N O F TIM E T O FHL E REPL Y BRIE F Petitioners , hereb y file thi s Motio n fo r Extensio n o

f Time t o Fil e Reply Brie f an di n suppor t

thereo f woul dshow : 1 . Petitioner s hav e filedaPar t 1 6 Complain t

agains t Miami Dad e County ; 2 . Th e County filedit s respons e afte r aseveral month dela

y an d receive dasevera l month tim e extension ; 3 . O n Octobe r

7 » 20Q8 > undersigne dcounse l assume ddutie s a s Mayo r o f Miam i Lake s i n Dad e County an dha s been require dt o spen dmuc h o f Octobe r 200 8 assumin g thos e duties ; 4 . Undersig n counse l ha dsough t extension s i n al l o

f hi s pendin g r^ses , unti l sometime i n earl y mi dNovember , du e t o thes e circumstances ; 5 . Ther e hav e been som

e change s i n th e statu s o

f th e partie s withi n th e pas t thirt y (30 ) day s tha t

nee dt o b e accounte dfor

i n preparin g areply ; 6 . A fina l extensio n o n amatte r

o f thi s importance , will no t

prejudic e areply ;Jov . 14 . 200 8 12:28P M michae l a , pizz i j r , ^' r430 1 P . 3

7 . Thi s matte r

involve s multipl e partie s an d ongoin g development issue s tha t hav e decade s o

f history ; 8 . Th e repl y i s th e petitioner s fma l opportunit y to documen t thei r complaints ; 9 . Undersigne dcounsel spoke wit h th e assistan t

County attorney , Davi d Murray , wh o indicate dth e Count y doe s no t oppos e a n extensio n o

f tim e unti l December 1,2008 , fo r

th e petitioner s t o file thei r repl y brief

; 10 . Petitioner s ar e requestin g unti l December 1,2008 , t o file thei r

repl y brief

. WBEREFORE : undersig n counse l an d petitioner s reques t a n extensio n o

f u p unti l December 1,200 8 t o submi t

thei r repl y brie f

in thi s matter .

Respectfully submitted , MICHAE L A . PIZZI , Jr. , P.A . Attorne y for

Defendan t 1527 1 N W 60 * Avenu e Miam i Lakes , F l 3301 6 Phone : 30 5 231212 1 FAX : 30 5 231212 3 E-mail : mplzzijr(@,yahoQ.co m By: _ Michae l A . Pizzi , Jr. , Es q Florid aBa r

No . 07954 5lov . 14 . 200 8 12:28P M michae l a . pizz i Jr . '^.430 1 P . 4 

### CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I HEREB Y CERTIF Y tha t acopy o f th e abov e Motio n fo r

Extensio n o

f Time t o Fil e Reply Brie f

wa s maile dto : OfQc e of th e Chie f Counse l Attn : FA A Par t 1 6 Airpor t

Proceeding s Docket 16-08-0 5 Roo m925 , Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , S

W Washington , D C 2059 1 Jennife r Trock , Esq * Pillsbury Winthro p Shaw Pittman , LL P 2300 N . Street , N

W Washington , D C 2003 7 Davi dMurray , Esq . Count y Attorne y P.O . Bo x 025504 Miami , F L 33102-550

4 

### By : Michae l A . Pizzi , Jr. , Esq .
No. 55339.

#### Tele-Tone Radio Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 162999-K.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2010-H1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    CitiMortgage, Inc. as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee and
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian.

    Dated:   December 11, 2013


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)