alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coast Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Brian P. Peters, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                               
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Brian P. Peters           
|                        |  |     |  | Brian P. Peters, President and
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### Emily Butler, *Appellant, v.*Francis X. Meyers, *Respondent.*

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by Barker, J.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v BERNARD GILES, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

8 USCMA 92, 23 CMR 316

No. 9587

Decided June 21, 1957

*First Lieutenant David N. Gorman*argued the cause for Appellant, *93Accused. With Mm on the brief were *Major Frank C. Stetson*and *First Lieutenant Gene E. Overbeck.*

*First Lieutenant Arnold I. Burns*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief was *Lieutenant Colonel Thomas J. Newton.*

Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. LatimeR, Judge:

The accused was charged with, and convicted of, an offense of absence without leave from July 31, 1956, to August 1, 1956, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886, and the crimes of assault with intent to commit rape and breaking restriction, in violation of Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for nine months, and forfeiture of $40.00 a month for a like period. The findings and sentence were affirmed by the convening authority and a board of review. The accused petitioned this Court for review, asserting that the sentence was inconsistent and illegal for it combined a dishonorable discharge with a partial forfeiture of pay and allowances. We granted the petition for review for the reason that a similar question was pending before the Court in the ease of United States v Cleckley, 8 USCMA 83, 23 CMR 307. Subsequently, at the request of counsel for both parties, the two cases were consolidated for argument. The principles we announce in that decision, this day decided, are dispositive of this appeal, and we therefore affirm the decision of the board of review.

Judge FeRGUSON concurs.

Quinn, Chief Judge

(dissenting)’:

I dissent for the reasons set out in my dissenting opinion in United States v Cleckley, decided this date.
Exhibit 4.47

 

Annex 3

 

To the Cash Pooling Agreement

 

Act of accession

 

Polca, 5 Place du Champ de Mars, 1050 Brussels, Belgium,

 

For the attention of the CEO,

 

Re: Accession to the Polca Cash Pooling Agreement (the “Agreement”) of Cdiscount (the “participating Company”)

 

1.              All terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Agreement.

 

2.              Cdiscount confirms having received and read all the provisions of the Agreement as well as any other information, document considered useful and necessary for the Agreement and its implementation.

 

3.              Cdiscount states to be controlled directly or indirectly by Casino Guichard Perrachon in the sense referred to in the definition of the term “Casino Group” in Article 1 of the Agreement.

 

4.              Cdiscount confirms having provided Polca with its latest legal financial statements, including financial information on its equity and its financial debts, in accordance with Article 6.2 of the Agreement, on the basis of which the Maximum Amount of Advances is set to 70 million (Seventy million) euros.

 

5.              Cdiscount hereby agrees to be a Participating Company within the meaning of the Agreement, endorses each of the declarations provided for in Article 9 of the Agreement, agrees to be bound without reservation by the terms and conditions of the Agreement, to benefit from all the rights it creates and engages to perform all the obligations imposed upon it.

 

6.              For the purpose of participating in the cash pooling transactions provided for in the Agreement, Cdiscount states that the account No. FR76 3000 3004 2500 0202 8410 917 opened with the Bank should be considered as its Secondary Account for the purposes of the Agreement.

 

7.              We confirm having the authority and capacity to sign the Act of accession to the Agreement.

 

8.              Please note that all correspondence relating to the Agreement will be sent by post, fax, email or telephone to:

 

·                  Antoine Dusart

·                  120-126, Quai de Bacalan CS 11584 — 33 067 Bordeaux CEDEX

·                  Email: antoine.dusart@cdiscount.com

·                  Telephone: 05 57 14 38 26

 











 

For the purposes of Articles 3 and 4 of the Agreement, only the person below or the substitute will exclusively have the capacity and the authority to represent us:

 

·                  Nicolas Woussen

·                  120-126, Quai de Bacalan CS 11584 — 33 067 Bordeaux CEDEX

 

9.              As we have negotiated and agreed, we have noted that, for us, the date of entry into force of the Agreement is fixed as August 1, 2014.

 

For the sake of good order, please return to us one of the two originals of this Annex, with your handwritten signature preceded by the words “read and approved”.

 

 

	
 
    	
Kind   regards,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Executed   in Bordeaux, on August 1, 2014
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Cdiscount
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
by   Nicolas Woussen
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Nicolas Woussen
#### Timothy Dolan, App’lt, *v.*The City of Brooklyn, Resp’t.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed February 10, 1890.)*

Municipal corporations—Firemen—Salaries—-Laws 1887, chap. 582.

An action will not lie in behalf of an engineer in the fire force of Brooklyn against the city to recover the difference between his salary as fixed by the board of estimate and the sum provided by chap. 582, Laws 1887, before the board has fixed the salary at the sum named in the act. He has a remedy against the board by *mandamus,*but the city is not in default until the persons designated have fixed the amount of salary and the city has failed to pay the amount so fixed.

Appeal from judgment dismissing the complaint

*F. A.*McGloskey, for app’lt; *Almet F. Jenks,*for resp’t.

Pratt, J.

Plaintiff sued the city of Brooklyn to recover the difference between the salary he and his assignors should have received and that which they did receive, as engineers in the uniformed fire force of the city of Brooklyn.

The claims are founded on chap. 582, Laws 1887, which provides that the pay of uniformed members of the department shall be fixed by a majority of all the members of the board of estimate of the city of Brooklyn.

The act gives the board of estimate discretion in fixing the amount of the pay of certain of the members, but gives the board no discretion in fixing the amount of the pay of engineers. Their pay is to be fixed at certain specified sums which vary with the length of service of the individual.

The board of estimate fixed the salary of plaintiff and his assignors, all of whom were engineers, at less sums than as directed by the act

The question to be determined is whether the city of Brooklyn can be sued for the difference in salary before the board of estimate has fixed the salary at the sum provided by the act of 1887.

It seems to us that such an action will not lie. The act directs the board to fix the salary of an engineer at *s,*specified sum. If the board neglects to fix it at all, or fixes it at a sum other than as directed, the person grieved has his remedy by *mandamus.*

There can be no default on the part of the city, and consequently no right of action against it, until the persons designated by the act have fixed the amount of plaintiff’s salary, and the city has failed to pay the salary so fixed.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Barnard. P. J. and Dykman, J., concur.
#### Linus B. Cobb, App’lt, v. Solomon S. Alexander, Resp’t.

Order reversed and attachment amended so that it shall stand for the debí of $420 only and costs, and the motion in other respects denied, without costs.
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

DANIEL R. SMITH,
Claimant

- Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERAN S AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee.

______________________

2013

- 7092

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 11

- 2308, Judge Robert N. Davis.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Daniel R. Smith’s unopposed motion to withdraw his appeal,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. Case: 13-7092 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 03/07/2014SMITH v. SHINSEKI 2

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

s21

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 7, 2014 Case: 13-7092 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 03/07/2014
|   | (i)    |   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                           |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (ii)   |   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                              |   |                    |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|    /s/ Nancy Bland |   |
| Name:                             |   | Nancy Bland             |   |
| Title:                            |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
| Date:                        |   | November 24, 2010       |   |
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8662 

To reduce commuting burdens on Transportation Security Administration 

employees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2024 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mr. GARBARINO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To reduce commuting burdens on Transportation Security 

Administration employees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TSA Commuting Fair5 ness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEASIBILITY STUDY ON TSA COMMUTING BENE7 FITS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 

10 the Transportation Security Administration shall submit 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8662 IH

1 to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of 

2 Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, 

3 Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Home4 land Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a 

5 study on the feasibility of treating as on-duty hours the 

6 time Transportation Security Administration employees 

7 working at airport locations spend traveling between reg8 ular duty locations and airport parking lots and bus and 

9 transit stops. 

10 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting the feasibility 

11 study required under subsection (a), the Administrator of 

12 the Transportation Security Administration shall consider 

13 the following with respect to Transportation Security Ad14 ministration employees: 

15 (1) The amount of time needed by such employ16 ees to travel between regular duty locations and air17 port parking lots and bus and transit stops at small 

18 hub airports, medium hub airports, and large hub 

19 airports (as such terms are defined in section 40102 

20 of title 49, United States Code). 

21 (2) The amount of time such employees spend 

22 commuting, on average, exclusive of the time de23 scribed in paragraph (1). 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8662 IH

1 (3) The potential benefits to such employees 

2 and the Administration of treating as on-duty hours 

3 the time described in such paragraph. 

4 (4) The feasibility of using mobile phones, loca5 tion data, and any other means to allow such em6 ployees to report their arrival to and departure from 

7 the airport parking lots and bus and transit stops 

8 concerned. 

9 (5) The estimated costs of treating as on-duty 

10 hours the time described in such paragraph, includ11 ing by considering such hours creditable as basic pay 

12 for retirement purposes. 

13 (6) Other considerations determined appro14 priate by the Administrator. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EX-32

          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF JOHN FLEMING

                   SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of GamezNFlix, Inc.
("Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


Dated: April 16, 2004                  /s/  John Fleming
                                       John Fleming, President
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series Publications

# Publications Prepared by NRC Contractors

*Documentation of technical, regulatory, or administrative information about NRC programs or activities prepared by a contractor. Other contractor reports may be available in ADAMS.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Brochures Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Conference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Contractors
          - Publications Resulting from International Agreements
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management
          - Publications Available in Adams
          - Drafts for Comment

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - Job Openings
                - ADVANCE Act
                - Palisades Restart
                - Artificial Intelligence
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents

#### Search NUREG-Series Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 25, 2024
Second Division.

Filed February 25, 1890.

#### Elizabeth D. Vail, Resp’t, *v.*Wm. M. Reynolds, App’lt.

No papers.

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs.

See 28 N. Y. State Rep., 707.
#### In the Matter of Levi Goldenberg.

— Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; order entered vacating assess* ment. Opinion by Daniels, J.
EXHIBIT 35.1














SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION (“THE SERVICER”)








I, Chris Ballinger, certify that:





(a)   A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable sale and servicing agreement during the period from May 5, 2010 to December 31, 2010 has been made under my supervision.




(b)   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.




March 29, 2011








/S/ CHRIS BALLINGER


Chris Ballinger


Group Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer of


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of the Toyota Auto Receivables 2010-A Owner Trust


- 23 -
Exhibit 99.5



CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Keith Benjamin Abriel, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of DHX Media
Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:



a. Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;



c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d. Disclosed in this report any change
in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;
and



5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and
the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a. All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b. Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.



Date: September 28, 2015



|/s/ Keith Benjamin Abriel     | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Keith Benjamin Abriel         | 
|Chief Financial Officer       | 
|(principal financial officer) |
**Exhibit 31.3****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)**I, Marc Kilbride, Vice President and Treasurer of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC(formerly Reliant Energy, Incorporated), as servicer (the “servicer”), certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by thisannual report, of CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company, LLC;     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusionin these reports is included in these reports;     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under the poolingand servicing, or similar, agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance reviewrequired under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilledits obligations under that agreement; and     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliancewith the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent publicaccountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program forMortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,agreement, that is included in these reports.   /s/ Marc Kilbride     Marc Kilbride  Vice President and Treasurer