alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Russell Ingledew, as Chief Financial Officer of IPEX, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IPEX, Inc. for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions);

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

June 9, 2006

 /s/ Russell Ingledew
-------------------------------
Russell Ingledew
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION

I, Steven Kane, certify that :

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Protalex, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designated such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date") and

(c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions);

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers an I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



                                                Date: August 28, 2003
                                                Steven Kane
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Steven Kane
                                                President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1457

FU JING WANG, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A77-353-602) Submitted: November 8, 2004 Decided: December 7, 2004 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas V. Massucci, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Eric W. Marsteller, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Wang abandoned her challenge to the Board’s denial of her applications for withholding of removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Fu Jing Wang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order affirming the immigration judge’s decision denying asylum, withholding of removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition for review. The decision to grant or deny asylum relief is conclusive “unless manifestly contrary to the law and an abuse of discretion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(D) (2000). We have reviewed the immigration judge’s decision and the administrative record and find the record supports the conclusion that Wang failed to establish past persecution or a well founded fear of persecution. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2004) (stati ng that the burden of proof is on the alien to establish his eligibility for asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992). Because the decision in this case is not manifes tly contrary to law, we cannot grant the relief Wang seeks. * Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions- 3 - are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
IB 

Union Calendar No. 537 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8671 

[Report No. 118–640] 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish the Intelligence 

Rotational Assignment Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2024 

Mr. PFLUGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

AUGUST 30, 2024 

Additional sponsor: Mr. SUOZZI

AUGUST 30, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8671 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish 

the Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program, and for 

other purposes. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8671 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DHS Intelligence Ro5 tational Assignment Program and Law Enforcement Sup6 port Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY INTEL8 LIGENCE ROTATIONAL ASSIGNMENT PRO9 GRAM. 

10 Section 844 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

11 (6 U.S.C. 414) is amended by adding at the end the fol12 lowing new subsection: 

13 ‘‘(b) INTELLIGENCE ROTATIONAL ASSIGNMENT PRO14 GRAM.— 

15 ‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than one 

16 year after the date of the enactment of this sub17 section, the Secretary shall establish an Intelligence 

18 Rotational Assignment Program as part of the Rota19 tion Program under subsection (a). 

20 ‘‘(2) ELIGIBILITY.—The Intelligence Rotational 

21 Assignment Program shall be open to analysts serv22 ing in analyst positions in an intelligence component 

23 of the Department, in the Office of Strategic Intel24 ligence and Information of the United States Secret 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 8671 RH

1 Service, or in other positions in the Department, as 

2 determined by the Secretary. 

3 ‘‘(3) COORDINATION.—The responsibilities 

4 specified in subsection (a)(3)(B) that apply to the 

5 Rotation Program under such subsection shall, as 

6 applicable, apply to the Intelligence Rotational As7 signment Program under this subsection.’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 537 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8671 

[Report No. 118–640] 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to 

Program, and for other purposes. establish the Intelligence Rotational Assignment 

AUGUST 30, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Jennie E. Kent, Resp’t, v. Richard C. Sibley *et al.,*App’lts.

Appeal from judgment of the city court.

*Ordered,*that the judgment be affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Barry Thomas, CEO of Global 1 Investment Holding Corporation.,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 302 of the
                          Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.)

I, Barry Thomas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global 1 Investment
Holdings Corporation.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 12, 2007
By:/s/ Barry Thomas
   ----------------
Barry Thomas, CEO and Director
Exhibit 31.4


CERTIFICATION


I, Michael Randolfi, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Groupon, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2016;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading, with respect to the period covered by this report; and


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly represent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.


Date:  March 22, 2017 /s/ Michael Randolfi


Michael Randolfi


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
No. 40264.

#### Protests 658292-G, etc., of Calvaire, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Certain items were found to consist of outerwear in chief value of wool similar to those involved in *United States*v. *International Clearing House*(24 C. C. P. A. 117, T. D. 48416). They were therefore held dutiable at 50 cents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114 as claimed. Knit outerwear in chief value of cotton was held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 917.
3200 Southwest Freeway, Houston, Texas 77027
P.O. Box 2824, Houston, Texas 77252-2824
713/543-8675, 800/288-3223


Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

(LOGO) BANK UNITED


RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:


A. I have reviewed the  activities and  performance  of the Servicer  during the
   preceding  fiscal  year  under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
   Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and
   to the best of these Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has fulfilled all of
   its duties, responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements throughout
   such  year,  or if there has been a default or  failure  of the  servicer  to
   perform any of such duties, responsibilities or obligations, a description of
   each default or failure and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported
   to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

B. I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is  currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
   servicer in good standing;

C. I have confirmed  that the Fidelity Bond, The Errors and Omissions  Insurance
   Policy  and any  other  bonds  required  under  the  terms  of the  Servicing
   Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or
   Seller/Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;

D. All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance  Policy (if
   applicable)  and Primary  Mortgage  Insurance  Policy (if  applicable),  with
   respect  to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have  been  paid  and  that  all such
   insurance policies are in full force and effect;

E. All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any  other  expenses
   accrued and due,  that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on
   any Mortgaged Property,  have been paid or if any such costs or expenses have
   not been paid with  respect  to any  Mortgaged  Property,  the reason for the
   non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

F. All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

G. All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of  Mortgage  Property
   required per section  6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the Internal  Revenue  Code,
   respectively, have been prepared and filed.



Certified By:
Tyrone W. Crawley

Vice President
Title

7/6/00
Date
(Reap. Dec. 9567)

#### M. Farris & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 899247.

(Decided December 22, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Ooehran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

It is provided by the rules of the court that in such an instance, after the opposite party has had an opportunity to present evidence on the issues, the case may be decided by the court on the record before it.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the present appeal for a reappraisement and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### In the Matter of Estaban Torres, Appellant, v Raul Russi, as Chairman of the New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 666]

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered September 3, 1992 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the State Board of Parole revoking petitioner’s parole.

As the result of his conviction of the crimes of manslaughter in the first degree and assault in the second degree, petitioner *770was sentenced to consecutive prison terms of 5 to 18 and 31⁄2 to 7 years. After his release on parole, petitioner was arrested in Massachusetts for criminal possession of a weapon. A parole revocation hearing was subsequently conducted at which petitioner waived his right to counsel and pleaded guilty to leaving New York without permission and criminal possession of a weapon. The Parole Board revoked petitioner’s parole and imposed a seven-year time period before he would be reconsidered for release.

Petitioner contends that his waiver of counsel was invalid because it was not knowing or intelligent. This contention must be rejected. The record of the proceedings reveals that petitioner was given the opportunity to seek legal counsel and was advised of the manner in which counsel could assist him with his case. Petitioner was fully aware of the ramifications of waiving legal assistance and, hence, we find that his waiver was voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently made. Under the circumstances presented, we further find that the Parole Board did not abuse its discretion in imposing upon petitioner a seven-year time period before he would be reconsidered for release on parole.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Meyers, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   February 9, 2011 | /s/   DANIEL MEYERS                               |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                           |                                              |
|                           | Daniel   Meyers                                   |
|                           | *Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President* |

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The First Marblehead Corporation and will be retained by The First Marblehead Corporation and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.*

 

----
From: Tim Mitro

To: Sutkus, Carol@ARB; Hicks, Austin@ARB; Lewis, Monica@ARB

Cc: Christopher D. Brown AICP; Sondra Spaethe

Subject: Feather River AQMD - SIP Submittal - Rule 3.22 - Final

Date: Friday, October 24, 2014 3:35:22 PM

To ARB Rule Group,

On October 6, 2014, the Feather River AQMD’s Board of Directors approved the amendments to

District Rule 3.22. The District is requesting to submit this rule revision into the SIP to replace the

previously issued Limited Approval – Limited Disapproval for the rule.

As previously discussed, the District has uploaded the required documents onto Dropbox. You can

find the required information at the following URL:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/225yaudzahbp9zm/AACdD88ZTJcdmjRB5sUegb1qa?dl=0

The required documents for Feather River AQMD’s inclusion of Regulation III, Rule 3.22 – Stationary

Internal Combustion Engines into the SIP include the following:

- SIP Checklist 3.22

- SIP eval form 3.22

- Rule 3.22 (Final)

- Rule 3.22 Resolution

- Rule 3.22 Public Notice

- Rule 3.22 Staff Report (Final)

- Rule 3.22 Lineout-Strikeout

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.

Timothy Mitro

Feather River AQMD - Air Quality Engineer

(530) 634-7659 ext. 208

1007 Live Oak Blvd, Suite B-3

Yuba City, CA 95991

www.fraqmd.org
#### Horace B. Claflin and others, *Respondents, v.*George Huber, *Appellant.*

— Judgment and order denying defendants’ motion for judgment and order denying new trial on minutes affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Dykman, J.; Barnard, P. J., dissenting *278on the ground that there is no proof of fraudulent contraction of debt.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Sai Lingamaneni, * From the 132nd District Court

of Scurry County,

Trial Court No. 11001.

Vs. No. 11-24-00029-CR * April 11, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Sai Lingamaneni’s motion to dismiss this appeal and 

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.