alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) [language omitted in accordance with SEC Release No. 34-54942] for the registrant
and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Language omitted in accordance with SEC Release No. 34-54942];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/     Donald L. Bobbitt, Jr.Donald L. Bobbitt, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Savvy Business Support, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Virginia K. Sourlis, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:





1.   
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      November 30, 2010
                
                By: /s/ Virginia K.
  SourlisName:
      Virginia K. Sourlis
                  Title:
      President and Sole Director
                  (Principal
      Executive Officer,
                  Principal
      Financial Officer
                  and
      Principal Accounting
Officer)
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

ZACHARY O. SMITH, ) 

) 

Appellant, ) 

) 

v. ) Case No. 2D12-3764 

) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

) 

Appellee. ) 

________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed January 29, 2016. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Collier County; Frederick R. Hardt, 

Judge. 

Zachary O. Smith, pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Susan M. Shanahan, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

Zachary Smith appeals the denial of his postconviction motion filed 

pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the denial of his 

motion on all grounds except for the summary denial of his claims alleging ineffective 

assistance of counsel for failing to impeach the victim's testimony. 
- 2 - 

The postconviction court summarily denied Mr. Smith's claim that his trial 

counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and impeach the victim's account of the 

acts underlying the charge of lewd and lascivious assault of a minor under the age of 

sixteen. Mr. Smith also argues that the trial court erred in denying his claim that 

counsel was ineffective for not investigating and examining the victim's statements to 

others after the assault. The State did not present any eyewitnesses to or physical 

evidence of the crime. Because the victim's testimony was the only evidence 

connecting Mr. Smith to this crime, her trustworthiness was critical to the State's case. 

The record excerpts the court attached to its order do not conclusively 

refute Mr. Smith's claim that he suffered prejudice because trial counsel was ineffective 

for not impeaching the only eyewitness's statements. See Pierce v. State, 137 So. 3d 

578, 582 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (reversing summary denial of postconviction motion where 

record did not conclusively refute movant's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing 

to impeach the State's only witness—the victim—with prior inconsistent statements); 

Bulley v. State, 900 So. 2d 596, 597 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (reversing summary denial of 

postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel that "identified the 

witnesses, provided what their testimony would have been, stated that they were 

available to testify, and alleged that he was prejudiced by their absence at trial"). 

Accordingly, we reverse the summary denial of these grounds in Mr. 

Smith's motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing. In all other respects, the 

postconviction court's order is affirmed. 

ALTENBERND, CRENSHAW, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 31
                                  CERTIFICATION

Certification of Chief Executive Officer, President and the person performing
similar functions to the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Marvin Maslow, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Manhattan Scientifics,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or cause such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or its reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
controls over financial reporting; and



Date: April 12, 2004

/s/ Marvin Maslow
-------------------------
Marvin Maslow
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Principal Financial Officer
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: May 10, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2015-1326 

Justin Leighton Stanley 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2015WP010044 

Respondent 

DISMISSAL ORDER 

On May 9, 2016, the Respondent filed a Notice of Withdrawal of Request for Hearing, 

stating that the parties had reached a settlement in this matter. 

Pursuant to 14 C.P.R. § 13.215, a party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the 

consent of the administrative law judge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such 

withdrawal, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the case with prejudice. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that these proceedings are dismissed with prejudice. 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

ONE COPY 

Robert M. Helfend, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Offices of Robert M. Helfend 

23838 Pacific Coast Highway 

No. 309 

Malibu, CA 90265 

TEL: 818-591-2809 

FAX: 818-222-1530 

Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7.6 

Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7117 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-20 15-1326 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EX-10.10(a)



 Exhibit 10.10(a) 
 June 1, 2014 
 PGR Capital LLP 
 Liberty House 
 222 Regent Street 
 London W1B STR, 
 UK 
 Attention:  Casey Grylls 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr.
Grylls: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2015 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 PGR Master Fund L.P 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 MSSB Spectrum Strategic L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mrs. Alice Lonero at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1304. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Alice Lonero

		 	 Alice Lonero
 Chief Financial
Officer 

	 	

  

			
	PGR CAPITAL LLP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Casey Grylls

		
	Print Name:	 	 Casey Grylls

		
	AL/sr
Order filed June 13, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00574-CV

____________

SOUTHBAY GUNITE INC., Appellant

V.

SOUTH POOLS INC. AND MUHAMMAD "MIKE" TELLO, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1145370

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed September 10, 2020. Our review has determined 

that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P.

34.5(c). The record does not contain.

1. Plaintiff’s Response to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss filed on

May 27, 2020.
2. Defendant’s Response to the Response to the Motion to Dismiss filed

on May 27, 2020.

3. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed on September 2, 2020.

The Harris County Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on 

or before June 23, 2022, containing the above documents. 

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the county clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the 

omitted item is not a part of the case file. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, Poissant.
#### Adolph Prochowick *et al.,*App’lts, *v.*Eugene S. Boyd, Resp't.

*Nathan Bijur,*for app’lts; *A. Simis, Jr.,*for resp’t.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Affirming 15 N. Y. State Rep., 809.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Michael K. Longinotti, Chief Financial Officer of Gryphon Gold Corporation, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Gryphon Gold Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issures fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting.



Date:

February 12, 2008



By:  /s/ Michael K. Longinotti

Michael K. Longinotti

Chief Financial Officer



---
1 

# United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit

No. 16-1146

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

BRIAN T. MULKERN,

Defendant, Appellant.

**ERRATA SHEET**

The opinion for this Court issued April 14, 2017 is amended as follows:

On page 14, line 20, change "did not pled guilty" to "did not plead guilty"
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8666 

AN ACT 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to authorize holding 

court for the Central Division of Utah in Moab and 

Monticello. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 8666 EH

1 SECTION 1. JUDICIAL DISTRICT. 

2 Section 125 of title 28, United States Code, is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘and St. George’’ and inserting ‘‘St. 

4 George, Moab, and Monticello.’’ 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8666 

AN ACT 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to authorin Moab and Monticello. ize holding court for the Central Division of Utah
#### Mary L. Chamberlain, as Trustee of Maud A. Cuming, Resp’t, *v.*Mari A. Cuming, App’lt.

*(City Court of Brooklyn, General Term,*

*Filed February 24, 1890.)*

Divorce—Action for does not affect liability under separation articles.

The liability of a husband under articles of separation is not released by the bringing of an action for divorce by the wife and application for alimony therein.

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.

*George*Gru, for resp’t; *Walter*Thorn, for app’lt

Osborne, J.

Defendant and the above named Maud A. Cuming were husband and wife, and differences having arisen between them, they entered into certain articles of separation bearing date December 22d, 1887, under which the plaintiff was appointed trustee of Mrs. Cuming. This action was brought to recover certain sums of money alleged to be due from defendant under said articles of separation. Plaintiff obtained judgment at special term for $543 and defendant appeals from said judgment.

The substantial contention of the appellant is that he is relieved from any liability under said articles of separation because his wife subsequently commenced an action against him for a limited divorce in which she applied for alimony and counsel fees, and that, by the bringing of such action, she rescinded and can-celled the agreement for a separation; in said action for limited divorce the defendant obtained judgment in his favor.

The law on this subject has been effectually settled in two recent decisions of the court of appeals, against the contention of the defendant *Clark*v. Fosdick, 22 *N.*E., 1111; 27 *N. Y.*State Rep., 750; *Galusha*v. Galusha, 22 N. E. Rep., 1114; 27 N. Y. State Rep., 738. In both of these cases, notwithstanding the wives had obtained absolute divorces from their respective husbands, the court of appeals decided that the obligations of the-husband to continue to make the payments provided for by the articles of separation continues, in the absence of any condition fo> the contrary in the agreement for separation.

Certain exceptions were taken on the trial to the exclusion of *676testimony; we have carefully examined them and can find no error in the rulings of the learned trial judge.

Judgment affirmed, with costs..

Clement, Ch. J., concurs.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Daedalus Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William Tay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ William Tay
--------------------------------
William Tay
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
January 28, 2011
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 21.1


                              List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                     Subsidiary                                               Jurisdiction of Formation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                  <C>
Knowles Electronics Japan, K.K.                                       Japan
Knowles Electronics (Malaysia) Sdn. Bnd.                              Malaysia
Knowles Electronics Suzhou Co. Ltd.                                   Peoples Republic of China/Suzhou
Knowles Electronics Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.                       Peoples Republic of China/Shanghai
Knowles Electronics Taiwan, Ltd.                                      Taiwan
Knowles Europe                                                        United Kingdom
Knowles Electronics Manufacturing Ltd. ("KML")                        Delaware
Emkay Innovative Products, Inc.                                       Delaware
Ruf electronics GmgH ("Ruf")                                          Germany
Knowles Electronics LLC                                               Delaware
Knowles Intermediate Holding, Inc.                                    Delaware
Ruf Electronics Kft.                                                  Hungary
Ruwido Austria Ges. M.b.H. ("Ruwido")                                 Austria
Ruwido Austria Gesellschaft m.b.H. & Co. K.G. ("Ruwido KG")           Austria
Ruwido austria GmbH ("Ruwido austria")                                Austria
Ruwido Gmbh & Co. K.G.                                                Germany
Ruwido GmbH                                                           Germany
Synchro-Start Products Europe Limited                                 United Kingdom
Synchro-Start Products, Inc. ("SSPI")                                 Delaware
Knowles Electronics France                                            France
Knowles Electronics Singapore Pte. Ltd.                               Singapore
Knowles Electronics (Weifang) Co. Ltd.                                Peoples Republic of China/Weifang
</TABLE>