alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,174
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (826)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (826)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (826)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 10491)

#### Arbit Trading Company *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 780133-1/3; 814610.

(Decided April 16, 1963)

*Tompkins d Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The above-enumerated appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision by counsel for the parties upon stipulation, reading as follows:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, subject to the approval of the court, that the above reappraisement appeals are limited to the items identified on the invoices as specified below. That said items consist of birch plywood from Finland of the same kind in all material respects, and subject to the same marketing and sales conditions as the merchandise and the conditions that were the subject of decision in the eases of *United States*v. *Arbit Trading Company,*46 Cust. Ct. 785, A.R.D. 131, and *United States*v. *Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation,*46 Cust. Ct. 797, A.R.D. *448133, and that the record in said cited cases may be received into evidence in the appeals set forth above.

> That at or about the dates of exportation such and similar plywood was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Finland; and the prices at which it was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Finland in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were as listed below, less, prorated, the items of ocean freight, insurance and consular fees as set forth in said invoices.

> Appeal Item Price per 1,000 square feet

> 285152A BB/WG-%" 60" x 30' $172

> 48" x 30" 167

> 298184A BJ/BB-%" 50" x 50' $261. 25

> 73" x 51" 296. 50

> 61" x 50" 273

> “ “ 60" x 36" 155. 25

> 71" x 36" 168. 75

> BB/WG-fs" 60" x 36" 198

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as in effect prior to the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise covered by the said appeals and that such values are as specified above.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent-Appellant, v Melvin E. Painter, Appellant-Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 547]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered March 16, 1993, convicting him of rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child (five counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and cross appeal by the People from so much of an order of the same court, entered April 19, 1993, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 which was to set aside so much of the jury verdict as convicted him of aggravated sexual abuse in the second degree.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, the motion to set aside the verdict is denied in its entirety, so much of the jury verdict as convicted the defendant of aggravated sexual abuse in the second degree is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for the imposition of sentence on that count.

The Supreme Court granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to set aside so much of the jury’s verdict as convicted him of aggravated sexual abuse in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 130.67 [1] [c]), on the ground that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to sustain the conviction on that count. We disagree.

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of aggravated sexual abuse in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant sexually abused the six-year-old complainant by inserting his finger into the child’s vagina and the medical testimony substantiated that this act caused the *482child to experience severe pain and injury. We reject the defendant’s contention that the complainant did not suffer "physical injury” within the meaning of the Penal Law *(see, Matter of Nichole L.,*213 AD2d 750; *People v Tomczak,*189 AD2d 926).

The Supreme Court erred in receiving the testimony of a Child Protective Services employee regarding statements made to him by the complainant during an interview since those statements constituted improper bolstering *(see, People v McDaniel,*81 NY2d 10, 16; *People v Pond,*217 AD2d 721; *People v Guce,*164 AD2d 946, 950). However, the admission of these statements, which implicated a codefendant only, were not so prejudicial so as to warrant reversal. The complainant’s testimony with respect to the defendant’s acts, coupled with the defendant’s confession, presents overwhelming proof of the defendant’s guilt. Thus, the improper admission of the challenged testimony from the Child Protective Services case worker was harmless error *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal. Joy, J. P., Hart, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
----

|                                    |   | Three months ended |      |   | Three months ended |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|-----------|--------|--------------------|--------|
|                                    |   | March 31, 2010     |      |   | March 31, 2009     |   |
|                                    |   |               |      |   |               |   |
| Income available to common stockholders |   | $                  | 140,090   |   |               | $      | 323,867 |   |
|                                    |   |               |      |   |               |   |   |   |
| Weighted average shares outstanding     |   |               | 2,664,875 |   |               |   | 2,660,218 |   |
|                                    |   |               |      |   |               |   |   |   |
| Basic earnings per share                |   | $                  | 0.05      |   |               | $      | 0.12 |   |
|                                    |   |               |      |   |               |   |   |   |
| Income for diluted earnings per share   |   | $                  | 140,090   |   |               | $      | 323,867 |   |
|                                    |   |               |      |   |               |   |   |   |
| Total weighted average common shares    |   |               |      |   |               |   |   |   |
| and equivalents outstanding for         |   |               |      |   |               |   |   |   |
| diluted computation                     |   |               | 2,664,875 |   |               |   | 2,660,218 |   |
|                                    |   |               |      |   |               |   |   |   |
| Diluted earnings per share              |   | $                  | 0.05      |   |               | $      | 0.12 |   |

----
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

 

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

 

I, Marc S. Hanover, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of GTx, Inc.; and

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: December 12, 2014

 
| /s/ Marc S. Hanover                                                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Marc S. Hanover                                                          |   |
| President, Chief Operating Officer and   interim Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                                            |   |

 

----
#### State, *ex rel.*W. J. Meredith, L. F. Rodgers and James G. Martin, v. Fred P. Cone, J. M. Lee and W. V. Knott, as and constituting the Board of Administration of the State, Fred P. Cone, as President of said Board of Administration, J. M. Lee, as Secretary of said Board of Administration and W. V. Knott as Treasurer of said Board of Administration, and as County Treasurer *ex officio*of Hardee County, W. C. King, M. *V.*Altman, Frank A. Chambless, C. D. Ivey and B. A. Prescott, as and constituting the Board of County Commissioners of Hardee County.

177 So. 545.

Case No. 3139.

Order Entered December 3, 1937.

*D. C. Hull*and *Hull, Landis & Whitehair,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, *J. Compton French,*Assistant Attorney General, and *Doyle E. Carlton,*for Defendants in Error.

*314Per Curiam.

The attorneys for the respective parties having filed in this Court a stipulation signed by the attorneys for plaintiffs in error and by the attorneys for defendants in error in- and by which stipulation it is agreed by and between said attorneys that the supersedeas bond filed in connection with the writ of error taken to the final judgment entered in this cause in the Court below be discharged and cancelled, that the respondents in the Court below, now defendants in error, by said stipulation waive any and all right to file further pleadings in this cause in the Court below, that said final judgment of the Court below be reversed by order of this Court without awarding costs to either party, without prejudice to the rights of any party hereto, and without passing upon the merits of said writ of error, and that this Court immediately remand this cause to the Court below with directions to the Court' below to enter final judgment awarding relators in the Court below a peremptory writ of mandamus in accordance with the commands of the alternative writ of mandamus heretofore issued in this cause and cancelling and discharging the supersedeas bond hereinabove referred to;

And said stipulation having been considered by the Court it is thereupon ordered by the Court that such stipulation be and it is hereby recognized by the Court and that the final judgment entered in the Court below be and it is hereby reversed, without awarding costs to either party, without prejudice to the rights of any party hereto, and without passing upon the merits of the said writ of error, and that this cause is hereby remanded to the Court below with directions to the Court below to enter final judgment awarding relators in the Court below a peremptory writ of mandamus in accordance with the commands of the alternative writ of mandamus heretofore issued in this cause in the *315Court below and cancelling and discharging the supersedeas bond hereinabove referred to.

Ellis, C. J.,-and Whitfield, Terrell and Brown, J. J., concur.
*Honorable Patricia C. Fawsett, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. [ DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________ No. 10

- 10695

_________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:09

- cv
- 80594

- WPD

THE CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

versus THAT CERTAIN UNNAMED GRAY, TWO

- STORY VESSEL APPROXIMATELY FIFTY

- SEVEN FEET IN LENGTH, her engines, tackle, apparel, furniture, equipment and all other necessaries appertaining and belonging in rem , Defendant , FANE LOZMAN,
Claimant

- Appellant.

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

__________________________ (August 26, 2013)
Before MARCUS and EDMONDSON , Circuit Judges , FAWSETT,* District Judge

. BY THE COURT: Now before the Court are Appellant’s amended motion to remand this matter to district Case: 10-10695 Date Filed: 08/26/2013 Page: 1 of 22 court for an evidentiary hearing and Appellee’s motion to strike Appellant’s reply in support of his
motion for remand. When this matter was last before us, we affirmed the district court judgment in favor of Appellee. However, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that the structure in question was not a “vessel” for purposes of admiralty law, and thus that the district cou rt lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the City’s action (herein the “Admiralty Action”). See City of Riviera Beach v. That Certain Unnamed Gray, Two

- Story Vessel Approximately Fifty

- Seven Feet in Length , 649
F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2011), reversed sub n om Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach , - - U.S.

-- , 133 S.Ct. 735 (2013)

. The Supreme Court expressly declined to remand for further proceedings. Id

. , 133 S.Ct at 745

- 746. Appellant has not shown that, despite the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction over the underlying action, the court would nevertheless be authorized to award him damages and attorney’s fees. Appellant’s motion for remand is DENIED, without prejudice to his right to pursue in an appropriate forum any remedies that may b e available to him. Appellee’s motion to strike is DENIED. The judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED with instructions to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Case: 10-10695 Date Filed: 08/26/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Frontier Select
Fund, a Series of Frontier Funds on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Frontier Select Fund.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Patrick J. Kane                                                                                                                                   | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Patrick J. Kane                                                                                                                                       | 
|Chairman, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Managing Member of Frontier Fund Management LLC, the Managing Owner of Frontier Funds | 



June 24, 2019
EXHIBIT 13.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with amendment no. 1 to the annual report of Mirae
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the year ending December 31,
2003, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Suk Joo Ko, Director of Accounting Team and
currently performing the role of Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2004


/s/ Suk Joo Ko
------------------
Suk Joo Ko
Director of Accounting Team;
Currently performing the role of Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mirae Corporation, and will be retained by Mirae Corporation and
furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 or the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted
to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 23, 2007.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (David Tatum, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:                

*1. First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.*, Hammond, Louisiana; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Homestead Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Homestead Bank, both of Ponchatoula, Louisiana, and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 26, 2007.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E7-5795 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S