alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Managed Futures Index Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                      
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund



|                                                                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                           
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                               
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund

Date: November 26, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCDP FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 6, 2009



> By:
> 
>                                                                                         
> 
>                                                                                         /s/ John R. SproulsJohn R. Sprouls
> 
>                                                                                             Principal Executive Officer
No. 42971.

Suit 4224.

#### Alpha *Lux Co., Inc.*v. *United States*

C. D. 75 affirmed.
No. 61386.

protest 313474-K (Seattle).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
EXHIBIT
23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (SEC File Nos. 333-130998, 333-130997, 333-125919) of Protalex, Inc. of
our report dated August 25, 2010, with respect to the financial statements,
which appear in the Annual Report of Protalex, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year
ended May 31, 2010.





/s/SHERB
& CO, LLP


SHERB
& CO, LLP





New York,
NY


August
25, 2010
Exhibit 99.10


Supply Agreement





(Unofficial English Translation)





Contract No. X-DM20110103


Place of execution: Pindingshan


Date of execution: January 3, 2011





Seller: Baofeng Hongchang Coal Co., Ltd.


Buyer: Wuhan Tieying Commerce Co., Ltd.





I. Purchase Order


Amount of Purchase (metric tons)Name of Receiver

Departure

Station

Arrival

Station

Goods

Specification

Yearly

Total

Purchase


First

Quarter


Second

Quarter


Third

Quarter


Fourth

QuarterWuhan Tieying Commerce Co., Ltd.

East Pingdingshan

Hanyang

Thermal Coal

Thermal Value

(Kcal/kg) ≥ 4500

Volatility ≥14

Sulfur ≤ 0.6


120,000



30,000



30,000



30,000



30,000





II. The price of the goods shall be RMB 500 per metric ton, subject to further negotiation between the parties according to the market price at the time of delivery.





III. A difference of 0.8 metric tons per truckload from the order amount shall be allowed without requiring additional payment or refund. Any difference of more than 0.8 metric tons per truckload from the order amount shall be resolved by additional payment or refund based on the actual amount delivered.





IV. Seller shall not deliver the goods until Buyer completes a sample inspection and gives permission to Seller to deliver.





V. Buyer shall pay for the goods when the goods are loaded and ready for delivery.





VI. Any unsettled matter under this Agreement shall be resolved through consultation between the parties. This Agreement is effective through December 31, 2011.





Seller: Henan Province Pindingshan Coal and Coking Co., Ltd. [corporate seal]


Buyer: Wuhan Tieying Commerce Co., Ltd. [corporate seal]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8564 

To require certain elements of the intelligence community to submit to the 

congressional intelligence committees a report with respect to biotechnology threats, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Mr. WENSTRUP (for himself and Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

A BILL 

To require certain elements of the intelligence community 

to submit to the congressional intelligence committees 

a report with respect to biotechnology threats, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Elevating Bio5 technology Threats Reporting Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8564 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENT ON BIOTECHNOLOGY 

2 THREATS WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ELE3 MENTS OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY. 

4 (a) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 

5 June 30, 2025, the head of each covered element of the 

6 intelligence community shall submit a separate report to 

7 the congressional intelligence committees with respect to 

8 biotechnology threats and intelligence activities related to 

9 biotechnology threats. 

10 (b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—Each report under sub11 section (a) shall include, with respect to each covered ele12 ment of the intelligence community, the following: 

13 (1) A description of any gaps that exist with re14 spect to intelligence activities that impede such ele15 ment from fully targeting, collecting, and analyzing 

16 intelligence related to biotechnology threats. 

17 (2) A description of any existing formal mecha18 nisms by which the intelligence community provides 

19 intelligence and support with respect to bio20 technology threats to— 

21 (A) departments and agencies of the Fed22 eral Government outside the intelligence com23 munity; 

24 (B) the governments of foreign countries; 

25 and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8564 IH

1 (C) private industry and academic institu2 tions. 

3 (3) An assessment of any existing mechanisms 

4 and manners by which the intelligence community 

5 consults with biotechnology experts and other out6 side experts with related expertise. 

7 (c) COVERED ELEMENTS OF THE INTELLIGENCE

8 COMMUNITY.—For purposes of this section, the covered 

9 elements of the intelligence community are as follows: 

10 (1) The Central Intelligence Agency. 

11 (2) The Defense Intelligence Agency. 

12 (3) The Federal Bureau of Investigation. 

13 (4) The National Security Agency. 

14 (5) The Office of the Director of National Intel15 ligence. 

16 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘‘con17 gressional intelligence committees’’, ‘‘intelligence commu18 nity’’, and ‘‘intelligence’’ each have the meaning given 

19 such terms in section 3 of the National Security Act of 

20 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Dawn H. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Tammy H., Appellant; Commissioner of Social Services, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 782]

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about April 16, 1993, which placed two of respondent’s children with the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of up to 12 months and a third child with his biological father, after a fact-finding determination that the two children had been sexually abused and neglected and the third child neglected derivatively, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Corroboration of the victims’ out-of-court statements of sexual abuse by respondent was provided by the testimony of a social worker that the children’s behavior, including age-inappropriate knowledge of female to female intercourse and other sexual behavior, manifested verbally and in play activities with anatomically correct dolls and drawings, was symptomatic of sexual abuse *(see, Matter of Nicole V.,*71 NY2d 112, 117-118, 121).

Family Court properly exercised its discretion in denying respondent’s motion under Family Court Act § 1038 (c) for a second validator of her choosing, in view of the many psychological evaluations already conducted, the evidence of anxiousness on the part of the children when recalling the abuse, and respondent’s failure to show that the original validator was biased or unqualified, or to present any information about the expert she intended to use *(see, Matter of Mitchell R,*216 AD2d 202; *Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N. Y. [Joanne W.[ v Edith W.,*210 AD2d 328, 329; *Matter of Nicole,*146 Misc 2d 610, 618). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Wallach, Ross and Williams, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-922-07-1310-FI; COC64227] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease COC64227 from Tatonka Oil and Gas, LLC for lands in Moffat County, Colorado. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Milada Krasilinec, Land Law Examiner, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at 303.239.3767. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $20.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 18                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral  Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease COC64227 effective December 1, 2006, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                 

Dated: March 15, 2007. 

Milada Krasilinec, 

Land Law Examiner.

 [FR Doc. E7-5243 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Before the First Division,

March 17, 1944

No. 49262.

#### Protests 989436-G, etc., of Elite Import Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is similar to that the subject of Abstract 48951 the claim, at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (c) was sustained.
Exhibit 32**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Christopher Naughton, the President and Chief Executive Officer ofMarshall Edwards, Inc. (the “registrant”), and David R. Seaton, the Chief Financial Officer of theregistrant, each hereby certifies that, to his or her knowledge: 1. The registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by the PeriodicReport and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by the PeriodicReport.These certifications accompany the Form 10-Q to which they relate, are not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.Dated: November 14, 2005     /s/Christopher Naughton   /s/David Seaton     Christopher Naughton   David R. SeatonChief Executive Officer   Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-50367

D.C. No. 8:05-cr-00248-AHS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Alicemarie H. Stotler, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Alejandro Sanchez appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion to amend the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

NOV 26 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
In his Rule 36 motion, Sanchez asked the district court to adjust his sentence

to account for time served in state custody before he was sentenced in federal

court. The record reflects that the district court intended Sanchez’s federal

sentence to run concurrently with only the undischarged portion of his state

sentence. Accordingly, the district court properly denied Sanchez’s Rule 36

motion because there was no error in the judgment to correct. To the extent

Sanchez argues that the district court erred in failing to run the sentences fully

concurrently under U.S.S.G. 5G1.3, Rule 36 does not provide a vehicle for relief. 

See United States v. Penna, 319 F.3d 509, 513 (9th Cir. 2003) (“Rule 36 is a

vehicle for correcting clerical mistakes but it may not be used to correct judicial

errors in sentencing.”). Moreover, the district court did not err in concluding that

Sanchez is not entitled to credit toward his federal sentence for time served in state

custody prior to his federal sentencing. See U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3 cmt. n.3(E) (section

5G1.3(c) “does not authorize an adjustment of the sentence for the instant offense

for a period of imprisonment already served on the undischarged term of

imprisonment”).

We reject as without support in the record Sanchez’s contention that he was

in primary federal custody beginning on October 12, 2005.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-50367
#### Gustave Lauter, *Respondent, v.*Joseph L. Berg and others, *Appellants.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by Brady, J.
No. 64226.

protests 58/2983 and 323944-K (New York).

#### George Tanier, Inc., and Trans-World Shpg. Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8159 

To prohibit the breaching of federally operated dams if such breach would 

result in the replacement energy resource occupying additional acreage, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2024 

Mr. NEWHOUSE (for himself, Mr. FULCHER, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. ROSENDALE, 

and Mr. BENTZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the breaching of federally operated dams if such 

breach would result in the replacement energy resource 

occupying additional acreage, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Abandoning Incon5 sistent and Rash Environmental Solutions Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘ACRES Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON BREACHING OF CERTAIN DAMS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army may 

9 not breach any federally operated dam if the energy reVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:53 May 29, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8159.IH H8159

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8159 IH

1 source intended to replace such dam as a result of such 

2 breach would occupy an area of land that is larger in acre3 age than the area occupied by such dam by at least 5 per4 cent. 

5 (b) STUDY REQUIRED.—If the Secretary considers 

6 breaching a federally operated dam, the Secretary, in co7 ordination with the Secretary of the Interior, shall conduct 

8 a study analyzing the number of acres of land such dam 

9 occupies. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John A. Scarlett, M.D., certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tercica, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tercica, Inc.

Date: August 9, 2006



By:

/s/ John A. Scarlett, M.D.John A. Scarlett, M.D.Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Tercica, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form
10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### In the Matter of Centennial Hill Partnership, Respondent, v Town of Warwick Planning Board, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 395]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Town of Warwick Planning Board dated April 21, 1993, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for preliminary subdivision plat approval, the appeal is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Murphy, J.), dated February 16, 1994, as granted the petition to the extent of remitting the matter to the respondent Town of Warwick Planning Board to approve the petitioner’s application subject to certain conditions.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the determination is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

The reasons given by the respondent Town of Warwick Planning Board (hereinafter the Planning Board) for denying the petitioner’s application for preliminary subdivision plat approval are not arbitrary and capricious, and they have a rational basis in the record. Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred by granting the petition to the extent indicated, thereby substituting its own judgment for that of the Planning Board *(see, Matter of Koncelik v Planning Bd.,*188 AD2d 469, 470; *Matter of Christie v Hirshon,*88 AD2d 598, 599-600; *Matter of Currier v Planning Bd.,*74 AD2d 872). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.3




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF


UCDP FINANCE, INC.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 27, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: October 20, 2009





By:

/s/ John R. SproulsJohn R. Sprouls
Principal Executive Officer