alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 38896.

#### Protest 886542-G of Spiegel Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

The protest was submitted without testimony. As there was nothing in the record to warrant disturbing the collector’s action the protest was overruled.
(Reap. Dec. 8476)

#### L. E. McCullough & Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 1446.

(Decided August 4, 1955)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*Geo. Stephen Leonard,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliveh, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> 1. It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Appellant and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Appellee, that the above reappraisement appeal is limited to the chamois identified on the attached Schedule “A”, and that the attached Schedule “A” is made a part of this stipulation.

> 2. That at the time when the chamois listed in the attached Schedule “A” was exported to the United States, such and similar merchandise was being freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the- principle [sic] markets of the exporting country, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States at the prices specified in the attached Schedule “A” (export value), plus packing as invoiced (£9/2/4), and that the “foreign value” as defined in Section 402 (c), Tariff Act of 1930, was not higher than the prices specified in the attached Schedule “A”.

> 3. The above reappraisement appeal is submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise identified on *401schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, and that such values were as follows:

> Schedule “A”

> 

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### The Belgian Glass Company, *Respondent and Appellant, v.*Theodore Pabst and Henry Esch, *Appellants and Respondents.*

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Opinion *Per Curiam.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                         45,328
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 261,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (127,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              243,780
<PP&E>                                                        559,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (59,006)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              6,888,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,104,007
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       24,160
<OTHER-SE>                                                  4,227,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                6,888,733
<SALES>                                                       223,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              223,749
<CGS>                                                         124,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               3,217,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              239,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             13,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (3,371,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (3,371,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (3,371,689)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (0.18)



</TABLE>
#### Samuel Colville, *Respondent, v.*Thomas B. MacDonough, *Appellant.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by Brady, J.
Before the First Division,

June 3, 1953

No. 57369.

protests 156529-K, etc. (New York).

#### A. J. Van Dugeren & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items consist of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) As to the items marked “A,” entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to May 28, 1950, at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (2) as to the items marked “B,” entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption subsequent to May 28, 1950, at 10 percent under said paragraph 1547 (a), as modified by the Arfiiecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP05-150-003]


Hardy Storage Company, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

March 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 19, 2007, Hardy Storage Company, LLC 
(Hardy) tendered a filing to place its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 
No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective date of April 1, 
2007.

Original Sheet No. 10
Original Sheet No. 13
Original Sheet No. 22
Original Sheet No. 23

    Hardy states that copies of its filing are being served to its firm 
customers, interruptible customers, and affected state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a 
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ddbd8cfded2f3f1f4f3f8cee8ededf2efe9ddfbf8effeb3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="25636077666a4b494c4b40765055554a575165434057460b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 26, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5512 Filed 3-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Dudley Mendenhall, Chief Financial Officer of Websense, Inc., hereby certifies
pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Websense, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Websense, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Websense, Inc. for the period covered by the Annual Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 27,
2009



By:

/s/    DUDLEY
MENDENHALLDudley MendenhallChief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Websense, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request. This written statement accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Websense, Inc.
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000778

23-MAY-2014

09:15 AM
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Energy Partners LP (“Central Energy”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Imad K. Anbouba, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Central Energy GP LLC, the General Partner of Central Energy, Carter R. Montgomery, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Central Energy GP LLC, the General Partner of Central Energy, and Ian T. Bothwell, Chief Financial Officer of Central Energy GP LLC, the General Partner of Central Energy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Imad K. AnboubaImad K. Anbouba,Co-Chief Executive Officer ofCentral Energy GP LLC, theGeneral Partner ofCentral Energy Partners LPMay 16, 2011/s/  Carter R. MontgomeryCarter R. Montgomery,Co-Chief Executive Officer ofCentral Energy GP LLC, theGeneral Partner ofCentral Energy Partners LPMay 16, 2011/s/  Ian T. BothwellIan T. Bothwell,Chief Financial Officer ofCentral Energy GP LLC, theGeneral Partner ofCentral Energy Partners LPMay 16, 2011
SAMMIE STANFORD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4323

________________________/

Opinion filed March 4, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Julian E. Collins, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 57 (Monday, March 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5397]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2007-08]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of petitions seeking relief 
from specific requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to 
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of 
the FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor 
the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before April 16, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the petition to the Docket Management 
System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket 
number FAA-2007-27330 at the beginning of your comments. If you wish to 
receive confirmation that the FAA received your comments, include a 
self-addressed, stamped postcard.
    You may also submit comments through the Internet to http://dms.dot.gov. You may review the public docket containing the petition, 
any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the 
Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays. The Dockets Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on 
the plaza level of the NASSIF Building at the Department of 
Transportation at the above address. Also, you may review public 
dockets on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frances Shaver (202-267-9681), Office 
of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591-3356 or Tyneka Thomas 
(202-267-7626), Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591-
3356.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 19, 2007.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2007-27330.
    Petitioner: Repairtech International, Inc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: Sections 145.202 and 145.217.
    Description of Relief Sought: Petitioner seeks relief to allow use 
of non-certificated subcontractors to perform special processes for 
which the repair station is not rated, such as special heat treat, 
induction heat treat and anodize materials.

[FR Doc. E7-5397 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Exhibit 32.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Winton/Graham Series.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                  
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                    
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                     
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                         
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund                                                                                                             
|Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund                                                      

Date: August 11, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 27, 2017

s0619 

# Order

Clerk June 27, 2017

154534

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154534

COA: 334205

Wayne CC: 16

- 003006

- FH

GARY GILMORE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of May 2, 2017, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the

application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2016 order of the Court of Appeal s. On

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leav e to appeal is

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal,

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on leave granted, of:

(1) whether the defendant waived the question of his entitlement to an evidentiary

hearing regarding the amount of restitution; and if not, (2) whether the Wayne Circuit

Court erred in denying him such a hearing. See People v McKinley

, 496 Mich 410

(2014). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We further DIRECT the Court of Appeals to REMAND this case first to the

Wayne Ci rcuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003

- 03, so that the

circuit court can determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint

counsel to represent the defendant in the Court of Appeals.

W ILDER , J., did not participate b ecause he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

            In connection with the Form 10-KSB of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2005, I, Richard J. Morgan, President and Chief
Executive Officer of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information contained in such, fairly presents such Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2005, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.



 /s/ Richard J. Morgan
-------------------------------------
Richard J. Morgan
President and Chief Executive Officer