alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2

ALESTRA, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

I, Bernardo García Reynoso, the Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 23, 2010



Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V.By:

/s/ Bernardo García ReynosoBernardo García ReynosoChief Financial and Administrative Officer


This
certification accompanies the report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporated it by reference.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000544

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

KAREN K. ABERSOLD, Claimant-Appellant-Appellant, v.

A MARKETING RESOURCE, LLC, Employer-Appellee-Appellee, and

STATE FARM INSURANCE, Insurance Carrier-Appellee-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD

(CASE NO. AB 2017-323(S); DCD NO. 2-13-04995)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) On September 2, 2022, self-represented ClaimantAppellant-Appellant Karen K. Abersold (Appellant) filed a Notice

of Appeal with the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board

(Board) without the fees required by Hawai i Rules of Appellate

Procedure (HRAP) Rule 3(a);

(2) On October 6, 2022, the Chief Clerk of the Board

notified Appellant that payment of appellate filing fees are

required under HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), and that if Appellant did not

pay the fees or obtain an order allowing Appellant to proceed in

forma pauperis, the record on appeal would not be prepared; 

(3) On October 20, 2022, the Board extended the

deadline for Appellant to file a Motion for Leave to Proceed on

Appeal In Forma Pauperis to November 1, 2022;

(4) The appellate record does not indicate that

Appellant filed here or with the Board a motion for leave to

proceed on appeal in forma pauperis;

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000544

15-JUN-2023

08:21 AM

Dkt. 20 ODSD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(5) On November 14, 2022, the appellate clerk entered a

default of the record on appeal, informing Appellant that the

time to docket the appeal had expired, Appellant had not paid the

filing fee or obtained an order allowing Appellant to proceed on

appeal in forma pauperis, the matter would be brought to the

court's attention on November 25, 2022, for action that may

include dismissal of the appeal, and Appellant could seek relief

from default by motion;

(6) Appellant has not taken any further action in this

appeal; and

(7) An appeal may be dismissed where the record on

appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay 

the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to

proceed in forma pauperis. HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, June 15, 2023.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

2
To the Board of Directors

Ableauctions.com, Inc. and Subsidiaries







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of Ableauctions.com, Inc. and subsidiaries, which were filed with the Commission as numbers 333-117979, 333-114906, 333-32740, 333106102, 333-106101, 333-106005, 333-87800 and 333-32740, of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms Report dated March 15, 2006 covering the consolidated financial statements of Ableauctions.com, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2005.







/s/ Cinnamon Jang Willoughby & Company



CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS



Burnaby, Canada

March 31, 2006
#### Emma Kay, *Appellant, v.*Sarah N. Churchill and others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Mem. by

Bockes, J.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8407 

To provide for the discharge of parent borrower liability if a student on 

whose behalf a parent has received certain student loans becomes disabled. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2024 

Mr. MAGAZINER (for himself, Mr. MOLINARO, Ms. NORTON, Mr. CARSON, 

Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. TONKO, Mr. MULLIN, and Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for the discharge of parent borrower liability 

if a student on whose behalf a parent has received certain student loans becomes disabled. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Domenic and Ed’s Law’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPAYMENT OF LOANS TO PARENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 437(d) of the Higher 

7 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087(d)) is amended 

8 by inserting ‘‘or becomes permanently and totally disabled 

9 (as determined in accordance with regulations of the SecVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:31 Jun 18, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8407.IH H8407

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8407 IH

1 retary), or if the student is unable to engage in any sub2 stantial gainful activity by reason of any medically deter3 minable physical or mental impairment that can be ex4 pected to result in death, has lasted for a continuous pe5 riod of not less than 60 months, or can be expected to 

6 last for a continuous period of not less than 60 months,’’ 

7 after ‘‘dies,’’. 

8 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub9 section (a) shall apply to any outstanding loan received 

10 by a parent before, on, or after the date of the enactment 

11 of this Act, and without regard to the onset date of the 

12 disability or impairment. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Estate of William J. Tracy, Deceased. William T. Tracy et al., Appellants; Robert E. Steinberg et al., Respondents.

[634 NYS2d 198]

—In a proceeding to settle the account of a trustee of a trust created by the will of William J. Tracy, William T. Tracy, Marylin N. Tracy, Ronald M. Blau, Anne Tracy Bricker, and F. William Crandall appeal from an order and decree (one paper) of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Brewster, S.), dated January 14, 1994, amending a decree of the same court dated October 24, 1990, which, upon setting aside a jury verdict determining, *inter alia,*that Dorothy Ennis Tracy lacked testamentary capacity to execute her will, directed that the trust be distributed according to the provisions of her will.

*644Ordered that the order and decree is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, payable by the appellants personally.

The Surrogate’s Court properly set aside the jury’s verdict that Dorothy Ennis Tracy lacked testamentary capacity. The appellants never refuted the testimony of the subscribing witnesses that the testatrix was alert, and of sound mind, memory and understanding at the time she executed her will. The appellants offered the testimony of an . expert witness, a neurologist, who never knew the testatrix and who never treated her. After an examination of the testatrix’s medical records, the appellants’ expert concluded that she lacked testamentary capacity to execute her will. His opinion was speculative and contradicted by the testimony of the respondents’ witnesses, including expert testimony. As this Court held in *Matter of Swain*(125 AD2d 574), speculative expert testimony should not be entitled to any weight *(see also, Matter of Vukich,*53 AD2d 1029, *affd*43 NY2d 668; *Matter of Slade,*106 AD2d 914, 915; *Matter of Langbein,*25 AD2d 681).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are not properly raised on this appeal. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Case Wo. 5,399.

#### GIBSON v. RICHARDS.

[Cited in Forbes v. Barstow Stove Co., Case No. 4.923. Nowhere reported; opinion not How accessible.]
Exhibit 10.20(a)


 


Compensation
Arrangement Mr. John Benson


 


Effective
March 1, 2015, the annual salary to which Mr. John Benson is entitled under his employment agreement with Pathfinder Cell Therapy,
Inc. has been reduced to $73,000.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-565]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER07-312-000]


Dogwood Energy, LLC.; Notice Shortening Comment Period

January 10, 2007.
    On January 8, 2007, the Commission issued a Notice of Issuance in 
the above-docketed proceeding. The notice established a period for 
filing protests or motions to intervene in response to Dogwood Energy, 
LLC's requests for blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Dogwood.
    By this notice, the date for filing motions to intervene or 
protests is shortened to and including January 24, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-565 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Smith, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 479]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated April 25, 1988 *(People v Smith,*139 AD2d 783), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 26, 1984, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Thompson, JJ., concur.
#### Cornelia W. Adair, and others, *Appellants, v.*Martin Brimmer and others, *Respondents.*

Decree of surrogate reversed and case remitted to the surrogate of Livingston county to restate the account as indicated in the opinion, neither party to have costs of this appeal as against the other or out of tlie estate.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 57 (Monday, March 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5485]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5729]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Edward Hopper''

    Summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Edward Hopper'', imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 
Massachusetts, beginning on or about May 6, 2007, until on or about 
August 19, 2007, the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, beginning 
on or about September 16, 2007, until on or about January 21, 2008, and 
the Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, beginning on or about 
February 16, 2008, until on or about May 11, 2008, and at possible 
additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. 
Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.
    For Further Information Contact: For further information, including 
a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julianne Simpson, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: (202) 453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, 
SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: March 20, 2007.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E7-5485 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
No. 41867.

#### Protest 274420-G of Fashion Bilt Gowns, Inc. (New York.)

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Embroidered Normandy laces were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting of Air University Board of Visitors. 

# SUMMARY:

The purpose of the meeting is to give the board an opportunity to review Air University educational programs and to present to the Commander, a report of their findings and recommendations concerning these programs. Discussions will include overall university status, degree-granting authority, reaffirmation preparations, and undergraduate education updates. 

# DATES:

The Air University Board of Visitors will hold an open meeting on 16-17 April 2007. The first business session of each meeting will begin in the Air Force Personnel Center Conference Room, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Dorothy Reed, Chief of Academic Affairs, Air University Headquarters, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6335, at (334) 953-5159. 

Bao-Anh Trinh, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

 [FR Doc. E7-5448 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5000-04-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00240-CR

Fernando Zamora

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 372nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1432653D)

July 12, 2018

Opinion by Justice Pittman

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgments. It is ordered that the judgments

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __/s/ Mark T. Pittman________________

 Justice Mark T. Pittman
CERTIFICATIONS Pursuant to Section 302
 
 I, Dan Sifford certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of First Auto, Inc. ;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
 
 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: May 14, 2003
 /s/Dan Sifford
 Dan Sifford
 Sole Officer / Director
#### Alex Taylor & Co., Inc., *v.*United States

No. 7312.

Invoice dated Tonbridge, England, December 19, 1945.

Certified December 27, 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 27, 1946.

Entry No. 741219.

(Decided June 26, 1947)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge

(Abstract): This appeal for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concerns the so-called British purchase tax described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The agreed set of facts, embodied in the stipulation of submission, establish that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)) is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values of the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
No. 45043.

#### Protests 785608-G, etc., of Austin Nichols & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Docket No. FAA -**  **2015 -**  **1988**
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

                 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO IFN-G DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT


                This AMENDMENT NO. 1 ("Amendment") is entered into as of this
the 4th day of April, 2000, by and between AMARILLO BIOSCIENCES, INC., a Texas
corporation with its principal place of business at 800 West 9th, Amarillo,
Texas 79101 ("ABI"), and HAYASHIBARA BIOCHEMICAL LABORATORIES, INC. with its
principal place of business at 2-3, Shimoishii 1-chome, Okayama 700, Japan
("HBL") (ABI and HBL being hereinafter collectively referred to as the
"Parties").

                WHEREAS, the Parties have heretofore entered into that certain
Distribution Agreement: IFN-G: Human, Oral; Other Species, All Routes, dated
September 17, 1997 (the "Distribution Agreement"); and further

                WHEREAS, the Parties desire to herewith amend the Distribution
Agreement as herein set forth;

                THEREFORE, in consideration of these presents and for other good
and adequate consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are evidenced by
the execution hereof, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

                Section 1 of the Distribution Agreement is hereby amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

                "SECTION 1. RIGHT TO DISTRIBUTE. HBL hereby grants to ABI the
                exclusive right to distribute product containing HBL IFN-g for
                inhalation and/or oral use in human species and use by all
                routes of administration in non-human species worldwide, except
                Japan."

                In addition, the first sentence of Section 4, "Term", is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                "Unless sooner terminated as hereinafter provided, this
                Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of thirteen (13)
                years from the date of this Agreement."

                No amendments or changes other than the foregoing are made to
the Distribution Agreement. The Distribution Agreement, as hereby amended,
continues in full force and effect according to its terms.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this
Amendment to be executed in duplicate by their duly authorized representatives
as of the date first above written.

ABI:                                HBL:

AMARILLO BIOSCIENCES, INC.          HAYASHIBARA BIOCHEMICAL
                                    LABORATORIES,  INC.

By:  //signature on file//          By:  //signature on file//
   -----------------------             -----------------------
   Dr. Joseph M. Cummins               Mr. Ken Hayashibara
   President                           President


                                       1