alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reportings to be designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/  Ian T. BothwellIan T. BothwellActing President and Acting Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
of Rio Vista GP LLC, the General Partner of
Rio Vista Energy Partners L.P.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-94,494-03 IN RE TONY ANTHONY TRAYLOR JR, Relat or

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 241-0710-13 IN THE 241ST DISTRICT COURT

F ROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam . O P INION Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this Court’s orig inal jurisdiction. He contends that he reque sted a copy of an 11.07 habea s application form but the County

Clerk fa iled to respond. On Marc h 15, 2023, this Cou rt h el d t h i s application in abey ance and order ed the District Clerk of Smit h County to respond. The Clerk states Relator reque sted an 11.07 habea s application, but their rec ords do not indicate that a form wa s sent in response to that re quest. We c onditionally g rant mandamus relief and direc t the Respondent to r espond to Re lator’s reque st by sending him the reque sted copy . The writ of mandamus will issue only in the event the Respondent fa ils to comply within thirty

day s of the date of this opinion.2

Filed: May

17, 2023 Do not publish
No. 46803.

#### Protest 951911-G of Jos. Dixon Crucible Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of amorphous graphite of the same character as that the subject of *Starkey*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 118, C. D. 444) the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 213 was sustained.
| Name: Baofeng Shunli Coal Mining Co., Ltd.                    |   | Mineral Resource: Coal                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                          |   |                                   |
| Address: West Zhaozhuang Village, Daying Town, Baofeng County |   | Underground Mining                     |
|                                                          |   |                                   |
| Mine: Shunli coal mine                                        |   | Production: 150,000 metric ton/year    |
|                                                          |   |                                   |
| Type of Company: Limited Liability Company                    |   | Size of Mine: 0.0772 square kilometers |
|                                                          |   |                                   |
| Effective Period: From September 2010 to September 2011       |   |                                   |

|   | 1.   | 3754164.00, 38392933.00 |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|

|   | 2.   | 3754175.00, 38392792.00 |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|

|   | 3.   | 3754111.00, 38392725.00 |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|

|   | 4.   | 3754048.00, 38392740.00 |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|

|   | 5.   | 3754040.00, 38392740.00 |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|

|   | 6.   | 3753828.00, 38392830.00 |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|

|   | 7.   | 3753806.00, 38392830.00 |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|

|   | 8.   | 3753900.00, 38393040.00 |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|

|   | 9.   | 3753864.00, 38393054.00 |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|

|   | 10.   | 3753886.00, 38393070.00 |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------------|

|   | 11.   | 3763936.00, 38393070.00 |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------------|

|   | 12.   | 3754046.00, 38393000.00 |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------------|
(Reap. Dec. 8595)

#### Paul K. Frankford, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 792022.

(Decided June 15, 1956)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of fact entered into by and between the respective parties.

On the agreed facts I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of merchandise invoiced as:

> 74 Hazel Pigskins 1 m.m.

> bd

> 79 Hazel Pigskins 1 m.m.. í>

> 30 “ “ “ _ W

and that such values were the appraised unit prices, less 46 per centum, plus packing.

Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise, the proper values are the values found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### Mary Beadleston, Resp’t, *v.*John B. Alley *et al.,*Impl’d, App’lts.

*Robt. G. Ingei'soll, H. M. Herman*and *O. H. LaGrange,*for resp’t; *Edward W. Sheldon,*for app’lts.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

All concur.

See 28 N. Y. State Rep., 89.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8518 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8518

To require that the prevailing wage utilized for purposes of subchapter 
IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly referred to 
     as the Davis-Bacon Act), be determined by the Bureau of Labor 
                              Statistics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2024

    Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Self, Mr. Palmer, Mr. 
DesJarlais, Mrs. Lesko, and Mr. Norman) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that the prevailing wage utilized for purposes of subchapter 
IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly referred to 
     as the Davis-Bacon Act), be determined by the Bureau of Labor 
                              Statistics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responsibility in Federal 
Contracting Act''.

SEC. 2. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS DETERMINATION OF PREVAILING WAGE.

    Section 3142(b) of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(acting through the Bureau of Labor 
        Statistics of the Department of Labor)'' after ``Secretary of 
        Labor''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``, using surveys carried out by the Bureau of Labor 
        Statistics that use proper random statistical sampling 
        techniques''.
                                 <all>
```
AFS-16-13855-E October 11, 2016

Exemption No. 15102A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2005-20038

Mr. Jerrod Seabaugh Director of Quality Control Era Helicopters, LLC 600 Airport Service Road Lake Charles, LA 70605

Dear Mr. Seabaugh:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend and amend Exemption No. 15102. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated June 22, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Era Helicopters, LLC (Era) for an extension of, and amendment to, Exemption No. 15102. That exemption, based on your petition dated October 9, 2015, incorrectly states that it applies to testing performed on your aircraft maintained under a continuous airworthiness maintenance program (CAMP) with limitations rather than that it applies to testing on your aircraft maintained under an a pproved aircraft inspection program (AAIP). As stated in your letter, existing regulations permit the holder of a CAMP to conduct the tests and inspections of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) §§ 91.411 and 91.413 on aircraft maintained under their CAMP and your original petition was to permit performing testing of your aircraft maintained under an AAIP.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of, and amendment to, the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to

Era.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 15102 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant Era Helicopters, LLC (Era) an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 91.411(b) and 91.413(c) to perform air traffic control (ATC) transponder tests and inspections and altimeter system and altimeter reporting equipment tests and inspections for its 14 CFR part 135 aircraft maintained under § 135.411(a)(1) using an Approved Aircraft Inspection Program (AAIP), subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. All ATC transponder tests and inspections and all altimeter reporting equipment tests and inspections must be conducted under Era’s part 135 General Maintenance

Manual.

2. All tests and inspections must be recorded in the aircraft’s maintenance log by the person performing teach inspection and test. This record must identify the person performing the inspection, the date of the inspection, and this exemption number.

3. All records of these tests and inspections also must be kept in Era’s maintenance recording system for its aircraft operated under part 135.

The Effect of Our Decision

This exemption terminates on October 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service
#### Albert V. Tillman, *Appellant, v.*The Buffalo and Idaho Gold and Silver Mining Company, *Respondent.*

Motion denied, without costs, and cause ordered over the term.
**Exhibit 21.1**

GeoPharma, Inc. 

List of Subsidiaries March 31, 2009 

BREAKTHROUGH ENGINEERED NUTRITION, INC., a Florida corporation 

GO2 PBMSERVICES, INC., a Florida corporation 

BELCHER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Florida corporation 

IHP MARKETING, INC., a Florida corporation 

BREAKTHROUGH MARKETING, INC., a Florida corporation 

BELCHER CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation 

LIBI LABS, INC, aFlorida Corporation 

EZ-MED COMPANY, a Florida Corporation 

DYNAMIC HEALTH PRODUCTS, INC., a Florida Corporation 

AMERICAN ANTIBIOTICS, LLC 

ACELLIS BIOSCIENCES
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 1, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1502

Lower Tribunal No. M19-6933

________________

Christopher Atanay,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Rivera 

Correa, Judge.

Christopher Atanay, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before HENDON, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
U.S. National Arboretum Plant Introduction

Floral and Nursery Plants Research Unit

U.S. National Arboretum, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 3501 New York Ave., N.E., Washington, DC 20002

The U.S. National Arboretum announces the release of 'Don Egolf', an exciting

new redbud. Though covered from "stem to stern" with vivid, rosy mauve flowers in

early spring, this cultivar produces no seed. The slow-growing, compact habit of 'Don

Egolf' makes it an excellent choice for the smaller garden. Handsome dark green foliage,

good disease resistance, and ease of progagation complete the picture of this one-of-akind redbud.

Cercis chinensis 'Don Egolf'
U.S. National Arboretum Plant Introduction

Floral and Nursery Plants Research Unit

U.S. National Arboretum: www.usna.usda.gov

Botanical Name:

Family:

Hardiness:

Development:

Significance:

Description:

Culture:

Propagation:

Landscape Use:

Availability:

'Don Egolf' Redbud

2001

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an Equal Opportunity Employer.

Cercis chinensis Bunge 'Don Egolf'

(NA 63877; PI 584482)

Fabaceae

U.S.D.A. Zones 6 – 9

In 1984, open-pollinated seed of Cercis chinensis collected from

cultivated plants growing in the urban and suburban districts of

Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples Republic of China, was sent to the U.S.

National Arboretum. After 5 years of field testing, beginning in

1986, research staff noted one plant exhibited a fairly slow-growing

compact habit and produced no fruit. This selection was propagated

and evaluated in 14 states throughout the U.S. for hardiness,

ornamental merit, and invasiveness. Released in July, 2000, by

Dr. Margaret Pooler, this redbud selection is named in honor of the

late Dr. Donald Egolf, renowned shrub breeder at the U.S. National

Arboretum.

'Don Egolf' is the first redbud cultivar released by the U.S. National

Arboretum. It has prolific annual bloom but is fruitless and has

exhibited no invasive tendencies. The dark green foliage, slowgrowing, compact growth habit, high field tolerance to

Botryosphaeria canker, and ease of propagation make it a

significant addition to the roster of redbud cultivars.

Height and width: 9 feet tall and 9.5 feet wide at 15 years.

Habit: Deciduous, slow-growing, compact, multistemmed shrub.

Foliage: Heavy, dark green, heart-shaped leaves.

Flowers: Prolific, bright rosy mauve flowers in early spring.

Fruit: None.

'Don Egolf' grows well in full sun to partial shade. It tolerates many

different soil types and is especially appropriate for areas that tend

to be dry or hot. Do not plant in poorly drained areas. Adaptable to

acid or alkaline soils.

Roots easily from semi-hardwood cuttings. Rooting occurs in 6

weeks under mist, 3000 ppm IBA. Suitable for commercial

propagation by budding or micropropagation.

Mixed shrub border; specimen plant; highlight at edge of woodland

plantings.

Available at wholesale nurseries 2001; available at retail nurseries

in 2002–2003.
Exhibit 32(b)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of MSW Energy Finance Co., Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, John T. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Michael J. Gruppuso, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


    /s/ John T. Miller                      /s/ Michael J. Gruppuso
    -----------------------                 -----------------------
    John T. Miller                          Michael J. Gruppuso
    Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer
    November 12, 2004                       November 12, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.3

                           MILLER EXPLORATION COMPANY

                             AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
                   MILLER EXPLORATION COMPANY STOCK OPTION AND
                          RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN OF 1997

     This Amendment No. 2 to the Miller Exploration Company Stock Option and
Restricted Stock Plan of 1997 (this "Amendment") is made and adopted by Miller
Exploration Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), effective as of
_________, 2001.

                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and Shareholders of the Company have duly
approved this Amendment to amend the terms and provisions of the Miller
Exploration Company Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan of 1997, as amended
(the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, any capitalized term used and not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meaning set forth in the Plan.

                                    AMENDMENT

          1. The Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 4.1 thereof in its
     entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following:

               4.1 NUMBER OF SHARES. Subject to adjustment as provided in
          Section 4.3 of the Plan, a maximum of 2,400,000 shares of Common Stock
          shall be available for Incentive Awards under the Plan. Such Shares
          may be authorized but unissued shares.

          2. Except as expressly set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full
     force and effect without further amendment or modification.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, acting by and through its officer hereunto
duly authorized, has executed this Amendment effective as of the date first
written above.

                                          MILLER EXPLORATION COMPANY



                                          By:
                                              ---------------------------------
                                          Name:  Deanna L. Cannon
                                          Title: Vice President - Finance
                                                 and Secretary
-  Home 

# Transportation in the United States 2013

**PDF**: TITUS_2013.pdf
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 22, 2014

NO. 03-13-00281-CR

Robert Murphy, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 8 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE, AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and 

the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The appellant shall pay all 

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Order filed July 2, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00417

- CV

____________ JENNIFER MITCHELL AN D TCSM, LLC , Appellant s
V.
TURBINE RESOURCES UN LIMITED, INC. AND TO M GEORGE &

INTERNATIONAL A., IN C., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2004

- 41286



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed May 4, 2015

. To date, the filing fee of $19 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant Jennifer Mitchell has established indigence or that appellant TCSM, L.L.C. is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 and Tex. R. App. P

. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the fol lowing order.Appellant s are ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $1 9 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before July 17, 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant s fail to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be
dismissed.

PER CURIAM