alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Distributed Energy Systems Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ambrose L. Schwallie, principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 9, 2006



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/    AMBROSE L.
SCHWALLIE                     
|Ambrose L. Schwallie Principal executive officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1631

In Re: MICHAEL TYRONE LYLE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:02-cr-00395)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Tyrone Lyle, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Lyle petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to correct its jurisdictional error. We conclude Lyle is not entitled to

mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. &

Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). The relief sought by Lyle is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EX-31.2
           RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF ARTHUR DE JOYA

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Arthur De Joya, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GameZnFlix,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for
the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
independent registered public accounting firm and the audit committee
of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: March 26, 2007                  /s/ Arthur De Joya
                                       Arthur De Joya,
                                       Chief Financial Officer
No. 58635.

protest 115724-K (Los Angeles).

#### Young’s Market Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155) and *United States*v. *Josebra*(41 C. C. P. A. 206, C. A. D. 552), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(November 27, 1995)

#### Mark Bazerman et al., Appellants, v Gan-Thi Enterprises, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And Related Actions.)

[635 NYS2d 500]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated June 22, 1994, as denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend the complaint to assert a cause of action pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e, and (2) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated *579April 17, 1995, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 22, 1994, is dismissed since that order was superseded by the order dated April 17, 1995, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated April 17, 1995, is reversed insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, so much of the order dated June 22, 1994, as denied the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend the complaint is vacated, and the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellants are awarded one bill of costs.

Since the defendants failed to demonstrate either prejudice or surprise, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion by denying the plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint *(see,*CPLR 3025 [b]; *Fahey v County of Ontario,*44 NY2d 934). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.
Before the Third Division,

June 27, 1938

No. 38910.

#### Protests 723701-G, etc., of B. Altman & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the ■court dismissed the protests.
**CERTIFICATION        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | 1.                      | Such                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October                  31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                  or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.                      | The                  information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                  the period ending October 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  Travel Hunt Holdings, Inc. |
|--------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**TRAVEL        HUNT HOLDINGS, INC.**

*/s/        Nancy Reynolds*
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-KSB of
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-109138 and 333-119988) of our report, dated January 20, 2006, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. as of December
31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003.


/s/ Trice Geary & Myers LLC
March 9, 2006
EX-10.12(B)



 Exhibit 10.12(b) 
 June 1, 2014 
 The Cambridge Strategy (Asset Mgt.) Ltd. 

Berger House 
 36-38 Berkeley Square, 7th Floor

 Mayfair, London W1J5AE 
 UK

 Attention: Mr. Tony Henry 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewal 

 Dear
Mr. Henry: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreement concerning the commodity pool to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2015 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Cambridge Master Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 



	 	•	 	 MSSB Spectrum Currency & Commodity L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mrs. Alice Lonero at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1304. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Alice Lonero
		 	Alice Lonero
		 	Chief Financial Officer
	
	THE CAMBRIDGE STRATEGY (ASSET MGT.) LTD.
		
	By:            	 	/s/ Edward Baker
		
	 Print Name:
	 	Edward Baker - Executive Chairman
		
	AL/sr
EXHIBIT 14

 

**MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC.**

**CODE OF ETHICS**

**FOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SENIOR FINANCE OFFICERS**

Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. (the “Company”) is committed to conducting its business in accordance with applicable laws, rules and regulations and to full and accurate financial disclosure in compliance with applicable law. This Code of Ethics, applicable to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller, or persons performing similar functions, (collectively, “Senior Officers”), sets forth specific policies related to the performance by the Senior Officers of their duties.

A Senior Officer must not only comply with applicable law but also engage in and promote honest and ethical conduct and abide by this Code of Ethics and any other Company policies and procedures that govern the conduct of the Company’s business.

Senior Officers will: 

•

Act with honesty and integrity, avoiding conflicts of interest in their personal and professional relationships.

•

Provide shareholders with information that is accurate, complete, objective, fair, relevant, timely and understandable, including in our filings with and other submissions to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

•

Comply with rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.

•

Treat confidential information acquired in the course of one’s work as such and not use it for personal advantage.

•

Not unduly or fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate, or mislead any authorized audit or interfere with any auditor engaged in the performance of an internal or independent audit of the Company’s financial statements or accounting books and records.

•

Achieve responsible use, control, and stewardship over all Company assets and resources that are employed or entrusted to us.

•

Proactively promote and be an example of ethical behavior as a responsible partner among peers, in the work environment and the community.

If a Senior Officer knows of or suspects a violation of applicable laws, rules or regulations or this Code of Ethics, such Senior Officer must immediately report that information to the Chief Executive Officer or any member of the Board of Directors. No one will be subject to retaliation because of a good faith report of a suspected violation.

Violations of this Code of Ethics may result in disciplinary action, up to and including discharge. The Board of Directors shall determine, or shall designate appropriate persons to determine, appropriate action in response to violations of this Code.

If a Senior Officer seeks a waiver of the Code of Ethics, such Senior Officer must make full disclosure of his particular circumstances to the Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors. Amendments to and waivers of this Code of Ethics will be publicly disclosed if and as required by applicable laws and regulations.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Giovanni Torelli, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 1017]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.), rendered February 3, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf, People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Long/Short Commodity Series.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                     
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                       
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                        
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                            
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: May 14, 2008
FRONTIER FUNDS



Exhibit
32.4



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C.§1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Fund, a Series of Frontier Funds on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/
                                         Patrick J. Kane                                                                                                                                                                           
|Patrick
    J. Kane                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|Chairman, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer
and Managing Member of Frontier Fund Management LLC,
the Managing Owner of Frontier Funds
                                                         
        August 14, 2018
#### PAULINE DeMARTINI, APPELLANT-PETITIONER, v. DeMARTINI COAL & LUMBER CO., *ET ALS.,*RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

*Mr. Robert Freund*and *Mr. Irwin A. Horowitz*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Warren Dixon, Jr.*for the respondents.

January *29,*1968.

Denied.
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### June 11, 2013 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT MICHAEL ACKER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v. WALTER DINWIDDIE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 13-5038 (D.C. No. 4:10-CV-00114-GKF-FHM) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *
Before HARTZ , O’BRIEN , and GORSUCH , Circuit Judges. In 2007 an Oklahoma state court convicted Robert Acker on drug, firearms, and other charges, and sentenced him to thirty years’ imprisonment. On direct appeal in state court, Mr. Acker pressed six arguments for reversal but to no avail. He then raised the same six arguments in a federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, with the same result. Now, he requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to contest the district court’s ruling. We discern no ground on which to grant Mr. Acker a COA because he offers us none. Instead, his COA application does no more than list four of the

* This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.grounds he raised below, without any argument or development. To be sure, it is well-settled that we read a pro se litigant’s petition with a special solicitude. But we are not his advocates, and we cannot create arguments on his behalf out of whole cloth. It is his burden to show that “reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that)” the district court erred, or even just that “the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted). Mr. Acker does not even make the attempt. Neither in any event are we able to detect for ourselves any error in the district court’s seventeen-page opinion. The district court carefully considered each argument Mr. Acker raises so briefly before us, and we see no basis for thinking a reasonable jurist could doubt the correctness of the district court’s disposition. Mr. Acker’s application for a COA is denied and this appeal is dismissed.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Neil M. Gorsuch Circuit Judge

- 2 -
#### In the Matter of Delphine B., Appellant, v Erie County Department of Social Services, on Behalf of Christine B. and Another, Infants, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[635 NYS2d 551]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in *Matter of Robert M. v Erie County Dept, of Social Servs.*(221 AD2d 979 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, O’Donnell, J.—Termination of Placement.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September 29, 2011 | /s/ Jianhua Lv                |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                | Jianhua Lv                    |
|                                | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                                | (Principal Executive Officer) |

----