13720 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules 

well as the general entry requirements 

of parts 141, 142 and 143. Participation 

in the RLF program is voluntary and at 

the option of the filer. 

§ 143.42 Definitions. 

The following definitions, in addition 

to the definitions set forth in § 143.32 of 

this part, apply for purposes of this 

subpart E: 

(a) Remote Location Filing (RLF)—

‘‘RLF’’ is an elective method of making 

entry by which a customs broker with 

a national permit electronically 

transmits all data information associated 

with an entry that CBP can process in 

a completely electronic data interchange 

system to a RLF-operational CBP 

location from a remote location other 

than where the goods are being entered. 

(Importers filing on their own behalf 

may file electronically in any port, 

subject to ABI filing requirements.) 

(b) RLF-operational CBP location—

‘‘RLF-operational CBP location’’ means 

a CBP location within the customs 

territory of the United States that is 

staffed with CBP personnel who have 

been trained in RLF procedures and 

who have operational experience with 

the Electronic Invoice Program (EIP). 

EIP is defined in § 143.32 of this 

chapter. A list of all RLF-operational 

locations is available for viewing on the 

CBP Internet Web site located at http:// 

www.cbp.gov (type in the search term 

‘‘Remote Location Filing’’). 

§ 143.43 RLF eligibility criteria. 

(a) Automation criteria. To be eligible 

for RLF, a licensed customs broker must 

be: 

(1) Operational on the ABI (see 19 

CFR part 143, subpart A); 

(2) Operational on the EIP prior to 

applying for RLF; and 

(3) Operational on the ACH (or any 

other CBP-approved method of 

electronic payment), for purposes of 

directing the electronic payment of 

duties, taxes and fees (see 19 CFR 

24.25), 30 days before transmitting a 

RLF entry. 

(b) Broker must have national permit. 

To be eligible for RLF, a licensed 

customs broker must hold a valid 

national permit (see 19 CFR 111.19(f)). 

(c) Continuous bond. A RLF entry 

must be secured with a continuous 

bond. 

§ 143.44 RLF procedure. 

(a) Electronic transmission of invoice 

data. For RLF transactions, a customs 

broker must transmit electronically, 

using EIP, any invoice data required by 

CBP. 

(b) Electronic transmission of 

payment. For RLF transactions, a 

customs broker must direct the 

electronic payment of duties, taxes and 

fees through the ACH (see 19 CFR 24.25) 

or any other method of electronic 

payment authorized by CBP. 

(c) Automation requirements. Only 

those entries and entry summaries that 

CBP processes completely in an 

electronic data interchange system will 

be accepted for RLF. 

(d) Combined electronic entry and 

entry summary. For RLF transactions, a 

customs broker must submit to CBP, 

through ABI or any other electronic 

interface authorized by CBP, a complete 

and error-free electronic data 

transmission constituting the entry 

summary that serves as both the entry 

and entry summary. 

(e) No line release or immediate 

delivery entries permitted under RLF. 

Line release (see 19 CFR, Part 142, 

Subpart D) or immediate delivery 

procedures may not be combined with 

RLF transactions. 

(f) Data acceptance and release of 

merchandise. Data that are complete 

and error free will be accepted by CBP. 

If electronic invoice or additional 

electronic documentation is required, 

CBP will so notify the RLF filer. If no 

documentation is required to be filed, 

CBP will so notify the RLF filer. If CBP 

accepts the RLF entry (including invoice 

data) under §§ 143.34–143.36 of this 

part, the RLF entry will be deemed to 

satisfy all filing requirements under this 

part and the merchandise may be 

released. 

(g) Liquidation. The entry summary 

will be scheduled for liquidation once 

payment is made under statement 

processing (see 19 CFR 24.25). 

§ 143.45 Filing of additional entry 

information. 

When filing from a remote location, a 

RLF filer must electronically file all 

additional information required by CBP 

to be presented with the entry and entry 

summary information (including 

facsimile transmissions) that CBP can 

accept electronically. If CBP cannot 

accept additional information 

electronically, the RLF filer must file the 

additional information in a paper format 

at the CBP port of entry where the goods 

arrived. 

Deborah J. Spero, 

Acting Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and 

Border Protection. 

Approved: March 15, 2007. 

Timothy E. Skud, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. 

[FR Doc. 07–1330 Filed 3–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–14–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 

Bureau 

27 CFR Part 9 

[Notice No. 72; Re: Notice No. 71] 

RIN: 1513–AB27 

Proposed Establishment of the Paso 

Robles Westside Viticultural Area 

(2006R–087P); Comment Period 

Extension 

AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 

Trade Bureau, Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; 

extension of comment period. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

a viticulture industry group, the Alcohol 

and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 

extends the comment period for Notice 

No. 71, Proposed Establishment of the 

Paso Robles Westside Viticultural Area, 

a notice of proposed rulemaking 

published in the Federal Register on 

January 24, 2007, for an additional 30 

days. 

DATES: Written comments on Notice No. 

71 must now be received on or before 

April 24, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments to 

any of the following addresses: 

• Director, Regulations and Rulings 

Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 

Trade Bureau, Attn: Notice No. 71, P.O. 

Box 14412, Washington, DC 20044–

4412. 

• 202–927–8525 (facsimile). 

• nprm@ttb.gov (e-mail). 

• http://www.ttb.gov/wine/ 

wine_rulemaking.shtml. An online 

comment form is posted with this notice 

on our Web site. 

• http://www.regulations.gov (Federal 

e-rulemaking portal; follow instructions 

for submitting comments). 

You may view copies of this notice, 

the petition, the appropriate maps, and 

any comments we receive about this 

proposal by appointment at the TTB 

Information Resource Center, 1310 G 

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. To 

make an appointment, call 202–927–

2400. You may also access copies of the 

notice and comments online at http:// 

www.ttb.gov/wine/ 

wine_rulemaking.shtml. 

See the Public Participation section of 

this notice for specific instructions and 

requirements for submitting comments, 

and for information on how to request 

a public hearing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: N. 

A. Sutton, Regulations and Rulings 

Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules 13721 

Trade Bureau, 925 Lakeville St., No. 

158, Petaluma, CA 94952; telephone 

415–271–1254. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TTB 

received a petition, filed on behalf of 21 

grape growers and vintners, proposing 

the establishment of the ‘‘Paso Robles 

Westside’’ American viticultural area in 

northern San Luis Obispo County, 

California. The proposed 179,622-acre 

Paso Robles Westside viticultural area is 

entirely within the existing Paso Robles 

viticultural area (27 CFR 9.84), which, 

in turn, is entirely within the existing 

Central Coast viticultural area (27 CFR 

9.75). The proposed Paso Robles 

Westside viticultural area consists of 

that portion of the existing Paso Robles 

viticultural area west of the Salinas 

River. 

In Notice No. 71, published in the 

Federal Register (72 FR 3088) on 

Wednesday, January 24, 2007, we 

described the petitioners’ rationale for 

the proposed establishment of the Paso 

Robles Westside viticultural area and 

requested comments on the proposal on 

or before March 26, 2007. 

On February 16, 2007, we received a 

request from the Paso Robles AVA 

Committee, representing 59 growers and 

vintners within the existing Paso Robles 

viticultural area, requesting a 30-day 

extension of the comment period for 

Notice No. 71. The request explained 

that the committee will be unable to 

meet before its next scheduled meeting 

on March 9, 2007, and that several of its 

experts will be out of the country until 

that time. The committee stated that it 

will have insufficient time after its next 

meeting to assemble and review its own 

evidence regarding the proposed Paso 

Robles Westside viticultural area, and to 

submit detailed comments on Notice 

No. 71. 

In response to this request, we extend 

the comment period for Notice No. 71 

an additional 30 days. Therefore, 

comments on Notice No. 71 are now due 

on or before April 24, 2007. 

Drafting Information 

Michael Hoover of the Regulations 

and Rulings Division drafted this notice. 

List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9 

Wine. 

Authority and Issuance 

This notice is issued under the 

authority of 27 U.S.C. 205. 

Signed: March 9, 2007. 

John J. Manfreda, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. E7–5353 Filed 3–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–31–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

32 CFR Part 199 

[DOD–2007–HA–0026] 

RIN 0720–AB14 

TRICARE; Changes Included in the 

John Warner National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007; 

Authorization of Anesthesia and Other 

Costs for Dental Care for Children and 

Certain Other Patients 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This proposed rule will 

implement section 702 of the John 

Warner National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (NDAA for FY 

2007), Pubic Law 109–364. Specifically, 

that legislation amends the coverage of 

contracted medical care with respect to 

dental care beyond that care required as 

a necessary adjunct to medical or 

surgical treatment. The entitlement of 

institutional and anesthesia services is 

authorized in conjunction with noncovered dental treatment for patients 

with developmental, mental, or physical 

disabilities or for pediatric patients age 

5 or under. This proposed rule will not 

eliminate any contracted medical care 

that is currently covered for spouses and 

children. The entitlement of anesthesia 

services will include general anesthesia 

services only. Institutional services will 

include institutional benefits associated 

with both hospital and in-out surgery 

settings. Patients with developmental, 

mental, or physical disabilities are those 

patients with conditions that prohibit 

dental treatment in a safe and effective 

manner. Therefore, it is medically or 

psychologically necessary for these 

patients to require general anesthesia for 

dental treatment. 

DATES: Written comments received at 

the address indicated below by May 22, 

2007 will be accepted. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number and/or RIN 

number and title, by any of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Federal Docket Management 

System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon, 

Washington, DC 20301–1160. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number of Regulatory 

Information Number (RIN) for this 

Federal Register document. The general 

policy for comments and other 

submissions from members of the public 

is to make these submissions available 

for public viewing on the Internet at 

http://regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifies or contact 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Col. 

Gary C. Martin, Office of the Assistant 

Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), 

TRICARE Management Activity, 

telephone (703) 681–0039. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

This proposed rule will amend the 

coverage of contracted medical care 

with respect to dental care beyond that 

care required as necessary adjunct to 

medical or surgical treatment. The 

entitlement of institutional and 

anesthesia services will be authorized in 

conjunction with non-covered dental 

treatment for patients with 

developmental, mental, or physical 

disabilities or for pediatric patients age 

5 or under. This proposed rule will not 

eliminate any contracted medical care 

that is currently covered for spouses and 

children. The entitlement of anesthesia 

services will include general anesthesia 

services only. Institutional services will 

include institutional benefits associated 

with both hospital and in-out surgery 

settings. Patients with developmental, 

mental, or physical disabilities are those 

patients with conditions that prohibit 

dental treatment in a safe and effective 

manner. Therefore, it is medically or 

psychologically necessary for these 

patients to require general anesthesia for 

dental treatment. 

Currently, general anesthesia and 

institutional services are not covered in 

conjunction with dental treatment for 

patients with developmental, mental, or 

physical disabilities or for pediatric 

patients of any age through TRICARE 

medical plan contracts. For military 

families who have children that require 

extensive dental treatment under 

general anesthesia, the two options 

available are to have the care provided 

locally at a Department of Defense (DoD) 

facility or a civilian facility. If the care 

is provided in a DoD facility, the total 

costs to the family are minimal. There 

are locations where this care is not 

available from a DoD facility due to 

facility constraints (no operating room) 

and/or lack of dental specialists. For 

dental care provided in a civilian 

facility, families currently enrolled in 

the TRICARE Dental Program (TDP) or 

TRICARE Retiree Dental Program 

(TRDP) are provided with coverage for 

dental care with applicable cost-shares. 

These include a 40% cost-share for 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS