alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Frontier Fund.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                            
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                              
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                               
|Brent Bales                                                                                                   
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 26, 2008
No. 64227.

protest 59/21092 (New York).

#### Share Sewing Machine Co., Inc., and Lang & Marshall Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sofa frames, properly dutiable as furniture of wood, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 23.1

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS'

 

The Board of Directors Mobile PET Systems, Inc. 2150West Washington Street, Suite 110 San Diego, California 92110

As the independent public accountants' for Mobile PET Systems, Inc. we hereby consent to the incorporation in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Mobile PETSystems, Inc., our report dated August 28, 2001, regarding the June 30, 2001 and 2000, consolidated financial statements. We also consent to all other references to our company included in this annual report.

 
|   | PETERSON & CO. |
|--------|--------------------|

Peterson & Co. 3655 Nobel Drive, Suite 500 San Diego, California 92122-1089
Before the Third Division,

March 16, 1950

No. 54130.

#### Hopper McGow & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 731141-G, etc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
### THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON DC 20590

The Honorable Kay Bailey Hutchison
· United States Senate

Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Hutchison: July 17, 2012

Thank you for your letter supporting the proposal submitted by the Del Rio International Airport for a grant underthe U.S. Department**ofTrrinsportation~s** Small Community Air Service Development Program. The Small Community AirService Development Program was established to help smaller· communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or insufficient service. Underthe statute, the Departmentmay make a maximum of40 grant awards each year, although no more than 4 awards may be to communities in thesame State. In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to theirair service deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types ofprojects that can be funded. On May 15, the Department issued an orderrequesting that communities interested in receiving a grant this year file their applications by June 11. As these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot commenton the merits ofany particularproposal. I assure you that the. Department will givefull and fair consideration to all proposals.thathave been properly filed. As is our normal practice, I am placing a c DOT-OST-2012-0069 as a contact outs' this program.i\AY B.D.ILEY HUTCHISON 

# ·iflnitrd cStatrs eSrnatr

The Honorable Ray LaHood Secretary U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: WASHINGTON, DC 20510-4304 June 6, 2012

The Del 

### Rio International Airport ofDel Rio, Texashas notified me that ithas submitted an application to be considered for the Small Community Air Service Development Grant Program. I am pleasedto support the application. CO.\IhlERCE, SCIENCE.**-~NO** inANSPORTI\TION

I am requesting**th~** Department ofTransportation to carefully considerthe merits ofthe grantproposal and ensure itreceives a fair and thorough review during the evaluationprocess. The Airporthas infornied me ofthe positive impact tlris grant will have in the community by improving air service, frequency, and fares for travelers, leadingto overall improved transpotiation options, including for those members ofour armed forces traveling to and fi·om LaughlinAirForce Base. Should you have any questions regarding the grant application, I hope you will not hesitate to contact Lucas Szabo in my office for additional information.

KBH/ls

Wcb=http://hutchison.senatP..[Iov
#### Associates Discount Corp. *v.*Vincent et al., Appellants.

Argued March 17, 1969.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*543April 23, 1969:

*Robert X. Medonis,*for appellant.

*John H. Pope,*for appellee.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed.

Mr. Justice Eagen took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of eAcceleration Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Clinton L. Ballard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
E. Edward Ahrens, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                        1934; and

                (2)     The information contained in the Repor fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Clinton L. Ballard
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Clinton L. Ballard
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer



                                                  /s/ E. Edward Ahrens
                                                -------------------------------
                                                E. Edward Ahrens
                                                Chief Financial Officer


                                                Dated: March 23, 2004
| Future War*An Assessment of Aerospace Campaigns in 2010Jeffery R. BarnettAir University Press      Maxwell Air Force Base, AlabamaJanuary 1996
****DISCLAIMER**
This publication was produced in the Department of Defense      school environment in the interest of academic freedom and the advancement      of national defense-related concepts. The views expressed in this      publication are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy      or position of the Department of Defense or the United States government.      This publication has been reviewed by security and policy authorities and      is cleared for public release.  
**
Contents        (HTML text, in frames)

PDF version (Requires Adobe Acrobat      Reader�)*
*Download      Adobe� Acrobat� Reader�  | Download      searchable Adobe� Acrobat� Reader�
* This link is provided for your convenience and does not    constitute endorsement of this application or other Adobe products..
**

Order*Future War* 

**

AU Press Home | Return to In-Print Publications 
 
Feedback? E-mail your comments or suggestions to AirUniversity Press 

Contents of this Web site reviewedand approved by AU/PA  (334) 953-2014   DSN 493-2014This page maintained by Thomas C.Lobenstein (AUL/LP)  (334) 953-6452  DSN 493-6452Report problems or send  comments about this page  to: Webeditor, Air University Press.

  ThisAir Force web site is compliant with Section 508 standards.**               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8483 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8483

 To amend the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations 
 Act, 2024, to make a technical correction to the Federal payment made 
    in such Act to the District of Columbia Public Defender Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2024

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations 
 Act, 2024, to make a technical correction to the Federal payment made 
    in such Act to the District of Columbia Public Defender Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Public Defender 
Service Technical Correction Act''.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION TO FEDERAL PAYMENT TO THE DISTRICT OF 
              COLUMBIA PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICE.

    (a) Technical Correction.--The matter preceding the first proviso 
under the heading ``federal payment to the district of columbia public 
defender service'' under the heading ``Federal Funds'' in title IV of 
division B of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (Public 
Law 118-47; 138 Stat. 460) is amended by striking ``, of which 
$3,000,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2026, for costs 
associated with relocation under a replacement lease for headquarters 
offices, field offices, and related facilities''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of title IV of division B 
of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
No. 46195.

#### Protests 760296-G, etc., of Acierno Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8379 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8379

   To codify certain rules issued by the Secretary of Transportation 
     relating to airline fare transparency, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2024

Mr. Gottheimer (for himself, Mr. Menendez, and Mr. Gallego) introduced 
      the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To codify certain rules issued by the Secretary of Transportation 
     relating to airline fare transparency, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enhancing Transparency from Airlines 
Act of 2024'' or the ``ETA Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. CODIFICATION OF RULES RELATING TO AIRLINE FARE TRANSPARENCY.

    The following final rules issued by the Secretary of Transportation 
shall have the force and effect of law:
            (1) The rule titled ``Refunds and Other Consumer 
        Protections'' and published on April 26, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 
        32760).
            (2) The rule titled ``Enhancing Transparency of Airline 
        Ancillary Service Fees'' and published on April 30, 2024 (89 
        Fed. Reg. 34620).
                                 <all>
```
Before the Third Division,

July 26, 1943

No. 48586.

#### Petition 6295-R of Illfelder Importing Co., Inc. (W. R. Zanes & Co., Broker) (Galveston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the only question raised by this appraisement was the cost of nondutiable charges which were deducted on entry. From the record it was found that in making the. entry the petitioner, acted without intention to misrepresent the facts or to defraud the revenue of the United States, or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 50138.

#### Protest 991463-G of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (Los Angeles).

*241Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of pincushions the same in all material respects as the merchandise the classification of which was involved in Abstract 49006, and that other items consist of bicycle horns the same as those involved in *Spiegel Bros.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 194, C. D. 692), which records were admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the protest was sustained as claimed.
EXHIBIT 31.1I, Jason Liddell, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-Kcontaining distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periodsincluded in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch Depositor,Inc., on behalf of Public STEERS® Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust;     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of thelast day of the period covered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required tobe provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, orsimilar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in thesereports;     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor andthe trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and basedupon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under thatagreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trusteehave each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the complianceby the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar standardsbased upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, afterconducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Programfor Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling orservicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York andits officers and agents.        Date: March 26, 2007 /s/ Jason Liddell   Vice President
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fidelity D&D Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert P. Farrell, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as added byss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934; and
2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
              financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

|Date: March 28, 2003 | By:  _________________________            
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                     | Robert P. Farrell                         
|                     | Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00383-CR

KERRI IRENE DANZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 1 OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant Kerri Irene Danz appeals the trial court’s revocation of her 

community supervision.

Danz’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as 

counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet 

the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation 

of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 386 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Danz had the opportunity to file a pro se brief

but did not do so; the State has not filed a brief.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this 

court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 

904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–

83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with 

counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in 

the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 

S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 

684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 27, 2013
#### In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant, v Philip Valeri, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 1005]

—In a *338proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7510 to confirm an arbitration award dated February 22,1995, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated May 25, 1995, which denied the petition to confirm the award and granted the respondent’s motion to vacate the award and to order a new arbitration.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, the motion is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for entry of a judgment confirming the award.

None of the grounds set forth in CPLR 7511 (b) for vacating an arbitration award are present in this case. Moreover, the arbitrator’s determination was neither totally irrational nor violative of public policy *(see, Matter of East Ramapo Teachers Assn, v East Ramapo Cent. School Dist.,*191 AD2d 696). Thus, we conclude that the respondent has failed to sustain the heavy burden borne by one seeking vacatur of an arbitration award *(see, Binghamton Civ. Serv. Forum v City of Binghamton,*44 NY2d 23, 28). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.
#### Brown v Holton Public Schools (After Remand).

(Docket No. 59789.)

*Foster, Swift, Collins & Coey, P. C.,*for plaintiffs-appellees. *Street, Stevens, Schuler, Johnson, Hipkiss, Piasecki & Knowlton*for defendants-appellants.

Rehearing denied.

Reported at 401 Mich 398.