alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 22, 2003



First Mutual Bancshares, Inc.



(exact name of registrant as specified it its charter)





|Washington                                     | 000-28261                | 91-2005970                          
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction
of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification Number)





400 108th AVENUE NE

BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004

(425) 453-5301

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code, and telephone number, Including area code)





Not applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Item 5. Other Events

On May 22, 2003 our Board of Directors declared a 10% stock dividend to be distributed on July 2, 2003, to shareholders of record on June 11, 2003.  In addition, our Board approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share which will have the same record and pay date.  The cash dividend will be paid on the new shares issued in the stock dividend.  Shareholders will receive 10 additional shares of common stock for every 100 shares currently owned.  A cash payment will be made in lieu of fractional shares.  First Mutual Bancshares, Inc. currently has 4.3 million shares outstanding, and will have approximately 4.7 million shares outstanding after payment of the stock dividend.  The attached Press Release was released on May 22, 2003.

Item 7. Exhibits

99.1	Press Release, dated May 22, 2003.



SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

| | FIST MUTUAL BANCSHARES INCORPORATED
| | -----------------------------------
| |                                    
| | By:  /s/ John R. Valaas            
| | Its:  President and CEO            
| |                                    



Exhibit Index:



|Exhibit |                                  
|------- | ---------------------------------
|        |                                  
|        |                                  
|99.1    | Press Release, dated May 22, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2035-2036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-546]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request; Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC 
20549.

Extension: Form 18-K, OMB Control No. 3235-0120, SEC File No. 270-
108.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form 18-K (17 CFR 249.318) is an annual report form used by foreign 
governments and political subdivisions with securities listed on a 
United States exchange. The information to be collected is intended to 
ensure the adequacy of information available to investors in the 
registration of securities and assures public availability. The 
information provided is mandatory. Form 18-K is a public document. Form 
18-K takes approximately 8 hours to prepare and is filed by 
approximately 40 respondents for a total annual reporting burden of 320 
hours.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.

[[Page 2036]]

    Written comments regarding the above information should be directed 
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95d1f4e3fcf1cac7fae6e1fef0e7d5faf8f7bbf0fae5bbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eaae8b9c838eb5b885999e818f98aa858788c48f859ac48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>; and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley 
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312, or send an e-
mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f3f3d2e30220e06030d00172f1c0a0c41080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9acac8dbc5d7fbf3f6f8f5e2dae9fff9b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 
30 days of this notice.

    Dated: January 3, 2007.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-546 Filed 1-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES BOHANEK, *ET ALS.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

*Mr. Benedict W. Harrington*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Arthur J. Bills*and *Mr. William J. Brennan, III*for the respondent.

February 13, 1968.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8514 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8514

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an annual 
     increase in stipend for books, supplies, equipment, and other 
  educational costs under Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program of 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2024

 Mr. Vasquez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an annual 
     increase in stipend for books, supplies, equipment, and other 
  educational costs under Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program of 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veteran Education Assistance 
Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL INCREASE IN STIPEND FOR BOOKS, SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT, AND 
              OTHER EDUCATIONAL COSTS UNDER POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL 
              ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 3313 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(1)(B)(iv)(I), by striking ``$1,000'' 
        and inserting ``$1,400'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(2)(B)(i), by striking ``$1,000'' and 
        inserting ``$1,400''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(m) Annual Increase in Stipend for Books, Supplies, Equipment, 
and Other Educational Costs.--With respect to fiscal year 2025 and each 
subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall provide a percentage 
increase (rounded to the nearest dollar) in the amounts payable under 
subsections (c)(1)(B)(iv)(I), (e)(2)(B)(i), and (g)(3)(A)(iii), equal 
to the percentage by which--
            ``(1) the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers 
        (U.S. city average) for the 12-month period ending on the June 
        30 preceding the beginning of the fiscal year for which the 
        increase is made, exceeds
            ``(2) the Consumer Price Index for the 12-month period 
        preceding the 12-month period described in paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated November 21, 2006, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on December 1, 2006, (71 FR 69590-69591), ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals, Inc., 238 South Main Street, Assonet, Massachusetts 02702, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule I and II: Drug
Schedule2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamine (7396)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
II
 The company plans to manufacture Phenylacetone to be used in the manufacture of Amphetamine for distribution to its customers. The bulk 2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamine will be used for conversion into non-controlled substances. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: March 8, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E7-5395 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                 ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of Big Flash  Corporation  (the "
Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Edward F. Cowle, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  Sec. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   EDWARD F. COWLE
-----------------------------------
Edward F. Cowle
Principal Accounting Officer
April 14, 2006



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
1 

### Sutton, Tia

From: Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:12 PM To: Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov; Chad_S_Whiteman@om b.eop.gov Cc: james.tamm@dot.gov; Sutton, Tia; Hengst, Benjamin; Spears, Matthew Subject: FW: HD FE GHG Phase 2 - RIA COMPARE to 060415 - FIR ST HALF Ch 00-04 Attachments: Ch 00 Cover Page ONLY - Compare.docx; Ch 00 Upfront TOC, Acronyms - Compare.docx; Ch 01 Industry Characterization - Com pare.docx; Ch 02 Technology and Cost - Compare.docx; Ch 03 Test Procedures - Compar e.docx; Ch 04 Vehicle Simulation Model - Compare.docx

Importance: High



### Hello, Attached please find the first half of the redlined RIA, which shows changes relative to the June 4, 2 015 versions that were sent to OIRA on June 5, 2015. Because of the large file size, could you please confirm that you have received this? Thanks, Tim
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR.R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth

in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60881

Summary Calendar

 

CHARLIE L. TAYLOR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MELINDA EZELL; GIA MCLEOD; 

MICHELLE EUBANKS,

 Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:01-CV-150-PG

 

March 15, 2002

Before POLITZ, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charlie L. Taylor, Mississippi prisoner # R6798, appeals the dismissal of his 42
1

 Chriceol v. Phillips, 169 F.3d 313, 317 (5th Cir. 1999).

2

 Ruiz v. United States, 160 F.3d 273, 274-75 (5th Cir. 1998).

3

 Id.; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

4

 No. 01-60568 (5th Cir. Feb. 21, 2002).

2

U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I), contending that three prison

employees prevented him from adequately amending his appeal in another case, and

moves to supplement the record on appeal. Finding that Taylor fails to allege prejudice

stemming from the employees’ actions, we affirm.

Taylor contends that three prison legal assistance employees interfered with his

access to the courts by denying him supplies, notary services, copies of letters, and a

transcript in order to prevent himfromadequately amending his appeal in another case.

To state a claim of denial of access to the courts, a prisoner must allege that the

defendant’s conduct actually injured him by prejudicing his position as a litigant.1

Taylor neither alleges that he was in fact prevented from properly amending his appeal

nor explains how he suffered prejudice as a litigant due to an improperly amended

appeal. Accordingly, the district court did not err in rejecting Taylor’s claim that he

was denied access to the courts and dismissing his complaint as frivolous.2

Taylor’s appeal is without arguable merit and is dismissed as frivolous.3 In

Taylor v. Brantley,

4

 this court imposed the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar against Taylor.
5

 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3

Taylor is therefore barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in the district court or in

this court in any civil action or appeal while he remains in prison, unless he is in

imminent danger of serious physical injury.5

Taylor’s motions to supplement the record on appeal are DENIED.
(November 21, 1995)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfonso Lesane, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 5]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Donnino, J.), rendered February 23, 1993, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion for a mistrial was properly denied, since any prejudice caused by the comment that may have suggested that defendant had intimidated witnesses was dissipated by the court’s prompt and pointed instructions to the jury to disregard it *(see, People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105, 111; *compare, People v Trinidad,*59 NY2d 820). Moreover, given the overwhelming evidence of guilt, there is no reasonable possibility that this isolated comment affected the verdict *(see, People v Brown,*208 AD2d 414, *lv denied*85 NY2d 906). The other challenged portions of the prosecutor’s summation were within the *bounds*of rhetorical comment permissible in closing arguments and responsive to defense counsel’s summation *(see, People v Johnson,*205 AD2d 309, *lv denied*84 NY2d 827). Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Wallach, Ross and Williams, JJ.
Before the First Division,

June 18, 1959

No. 63179.

#### Modern Food Products Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/16143, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Richter Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C.C.P.A. 128, C.A.D. 649), the claim at *5%*percent under paragraph 718(b), as modified, *supra,*was sustained, except that the merchandise covered by protest 307783-K was held dutiable at 6% percent under said paragraph, as modified, *supra.*
Exhibit 32.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Managed Futures Index Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                      
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                        
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                         
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                             
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: May 14, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7235

TIMOTHY TODD HAYES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. T. JOHNSON; GRADY MULLINS; M. C. AMMONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-02-2218) Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 27, 2004 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Todd Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, III, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Timothy Todd Hayes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Hayes that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Hayes failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Hayes has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED