alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Protalex, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ending May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
August 27, 2010





/s/ Kirk M. WarshawKirk
      M. WarshawChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-50763

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RIGOBERTO ALTAMIRANO-LOPEZ, also

known as Ernesto Ochoa-Lopez,

Defendant-Appellant.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

(EP-96-CR-49-ALL)

_______________________________________________________

August 31, 1998

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court’s sentence of 70 months is affirmed. The

order of this court on the prior appeal “for resentencing

consistent herewith” (114 F.3d 48, 50) did not restrict the

district court to a sentence without the enhancement. It was to

resolve the uncertainty of the state judgment. When this court

remands for resentencing, without expressly limiting the district

court, it is expected that the court will determine the proper
2

sentence, hearing additional evidence if necessary. See United

States v. Marmolejo, 139 F.3d 528 (5th Cir. 1998) and United

States v. Kinder, 980 F.2d 961 (5th cir. 1992).

The district court’s order incorrectly assessed $100 instead

of $50 for the special assessment, a clerical error or

inadvertent oversight. The cause is remanded for modification

and correction.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. CAUSE REMANDED FOR

CORRECTION.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 12, 2022 No. 04-22-00387-CR EX PARTE Franklin Jose Velasquez MARTINEZ , From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10369CR Honorable Roland Andrade, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The State’s motion for extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due September 20, 2022.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of September, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.37

Summary of Compensation For Named Executive Officers 2015*

In February 2015, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors established 2015 salary and target bonus applicable to our executive officers as follows:

 


	
Named Executive
	
 
	
2015
Base Salary($)
	
 
	
 
	
2015
Target Bonus($)
	
 

	
Charles M. Dauber
	
 
	
 
	
350,000
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
175,000
	
 

	
William C. Miller
	
 
	
 
	
200,000
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
100,000
	
 

	
Neal T. Hare
	
 
	
 
	
205,990
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
100,000
	
 

	
James J. Steffek
	
 
	
 
	
205,990
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
100,000
	
 

	
Andrew L. Puhala
	
 
	
 
	
205,990
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
60,000
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerry Brown, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 565]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, People v Saunders,*190 AD2d 1092, 1093, *1024
      *lv denied*81 NY2d 1019). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10163

Conference Calendar

 

LEWIS RAY YOUNG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

D.L. “SONNY” KEESEE, Sheriff,

Lubbock County Jail; 

KAREN SCREWBY, Deputy,

Lubbock County Jail,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:95-CV-128-C

- - - - - - - - - -

August 21, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Lewis Young has appealed the dismissal of his action under

the Texas Tort Claims Act, based on allegations that he was

chemically injured when he was an inmate of the Lubbock County

Jail. 
No. 96-10163

- 2 -

This court has previously affirmed the dismissal of Young’s

civil rights action, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, based on the same facts. 

Young v. Keesee, No. 94-11039 (5th Cir. March 22, 1995)

(unpublished). Therefore, this appeal is frivolous as a matter

of law. See Pittman v. Moore, 980 F.2d 994 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Young’s motion for leave to supplement the record also lacks

merit, because his exhibits are not relevant to this issue.

We caution Young that the filing of any further frivolous

appeals will invite the imposition of the full range of

sanctions, up to and including the requirement of securing prior

approval of the court for any future legal filing. Young is

cautioned to review any pending appeal he may have to ensure that

no argument or contention is raised which is frivolous. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 08, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 08, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0462. GEORGIA PAIN AND WELLNESS CENTER, LLC v. MELISSA 

HATCHETT.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

20ST0041
EX-10.6(b)



 Exhibit 10.6(b) 

June 1, 2014 
 Aventis Asset Management, LLC 

2150 E. Lake Cook Road, Suite 720 
 Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 

 

			
	Attention:		Mr. Steve Hwang

  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr. Hwang: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2015 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	Commodity Advisors Fund LP. 

  

	 	•	 	MB Master Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	MSSB Spectrum Strategic L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Managed Futures Premier Aventis II, L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Managed Futures Premier Aventis L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	MSMF Custom Solutions Fund L.P. 

 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mrs. Alice Lonero at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1304. 
  

					
	Very truly yours,
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
			
	By:				 /s/ Alice Lonero

					Alice Lonero
					Chief Financial Officer


					
	
	AVENTIS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC
			
	By:				 /s/ Steve Hwang



					
	Print Name:				 Steve Hwang

	AL/sr
EXHIBIT 10.2

                               ARTICLES OF MERGER
                                       OF
                           INVESTRA ENTERPRISES, INC.
                             (A FLORIDA CORPORATION)
                                      INTO
                          PATHOBIOTEK DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
                              (A TEXAS CORPORATION)

     The Undersigned, being, and the President of Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc.
a Texas corporation, hereby certify as follows:

     1.   A merger has been approved by the boards of directors of Investra
Enterprises, Inc. a Florida corporation, the wholly owned subsidiary and
Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc. a Texas corporation, the Parent by resolution
dated March 6, 2000, a copy of which is attached hereto.
     2.   Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc. is the Parent and Investra Enterprises,
Inc. is the wholly owned subsidiary,
     3.   No vote of Shareholders is necessary because 100% of the outstanding
shares of Investra Enterprises, Inc. consisting of 672,000 common shares are
owned by Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc. and

          a)   The corporation, Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc. is the sole
survivor and the name of the corporation will be Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc.
          b)   The Articles of Incorporation will not differ from Articles of
Incorporation prior to merger
          c)   Each shareholder of the corporation whose shares were outstanding
immediately before the effective date of the merger will hold the same number of
shares, with identical designations, preferences, limitations and relative
rights immediately after the effective date of the merger.
          d)   The voting power of the number of shares outstanding immediately
after the merger will not be changed from that existing prior to the merger
since no shares are being issued as a result of the merger.
          e)   The number of participating shares outstanding immediately after
the merger is the same as immediately before the merger and there will be no
change in shares.
          f)   The Board of Directors of each corporation has adopted a
resolution approving the Plan of Merger, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

     4)   The merger shall be effective on March 6, 2000 or as soon thereafter
as the Articles of Merger are filed with the Secretary of State of Texas.

Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc.

by:  /s/ [Signature Unreadable]
     --------------------------
     President - CEO


<PAGE>
NATURAL GAS

OVERVIEW GLOSSARY › FAQS › DATA ANALYSIS & PROJECTIONS

Referring Pages:

Natural Gas Futures Prices (NYMEX)

 View History: Daily Weekly Monthly Annual Download Data (XLS File)

This series is available through the EIA open data API and can be downloaded to Excel or embedded as an interactive chart or map on your website.

Henry Hub Natural Gas Spot Price (Dollars per Million Btu)

Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9

 1990's 2.49 2.09 2.27

 2000's 4.31 3.96 3.38 5.47 5.89 8.69 6.73 6.97 8.86 3.94

 2010's 4.37 4.00 2.75 3.73

- = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.

Release Date: 8/26/2015

Next Release Date: 9/2/2015

Referring Pages:

Natural Gas Futures Prices (NYMEX)

Henry Hub Natural Gas Spot Price

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

0.0

10.0

Data Source: Thomson Reuters

Dollars per Million Btu

Henry Hub Natural Gas Spot Price

2.5

5.0

7.5

Henry Hub Natural Gas Spot Price (Dollars per Million Btu) http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngwhhdA.htm

1 of 1 8/31/2015 9:00 AM
EXHIBIT 32 - CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION


Exhibit 32.1

Statement Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of OBN Holdings, Inc. (the "Company").  This Certificate is made
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification
accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2007 (the "10-Q Report").

The undersigned certifies that the 10-Q Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.


Date: May 12, 2009                    /s/ ROGER N. SMITH
                                     --------------------------------
                                           Roger N. Smith
                                           Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 12, 2009                   /s/ LARRY TAYLOR
                                     ---------------------------------
                                           Larry Taylor
                                           Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8405 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8405

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 90 McCamly Street South in Battle Creek, Michigan, as the 
                    ``Sojourner Truth Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2024

 Mr. Huizenga (for himself, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Thanedar, Mr. 
  Moolenaar, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Walberg, Ms. Scholten, Mrs. McClain, Ms. 
   Stevens, Mr. James, Mrs. Dingell, and Ms. Slotkin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 90 McCamly Street South in Battle Creek, Michigan, as the 
                    ``Sojourner Truth Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOJOURNER TRUTH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 90 McCamly Street South in Battle Creek, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sojourner Truth Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sojourner 
Truth Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2




             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL AND STRATEGIC OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         In connection with the Annual Report of Hotels.com (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mel
Robinson, Chief Financial and Strategic Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






                                           /s/ Mel Robinson
                                           Mel Robinson
                                           Chief Financial and Strategic Officer
                                           April 30, 2003
EXHIBIT 11

            Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Earnings

         The following table shows the average weighted number of shares used in
computing earnings per share and the effect on weighted average number of shares
of diluted  potential common stock.  Weighted average number of shares have been
retroactively restated giving effect to stock dividends and splits.  Information
for years ending prior to December 22, 1999  reflects  information  for Virginia
Commerce Bank.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                               Year Ended December 31,

<S>                                            <C>                      <C>                       <C>
Earnings Per Common Share                      2000                     1999                      1998
     Basic                                    $1.50                     $1.00                    $0.71
     Average Shares Outstanding             2,165,687                 2,164,392                2,116,631
     Diluted                                  $1.41                     $0.94                    $0.66
     Average Shares Outstanding             2,303,223                 2,303,743                2,266,143
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 4.35


                              EXTENSION OF SUBLEASE


As per the Sublease dated April 28th,  1999 between Valmet  Automation  (Canada)
Ltd.  subsequently having a name change to METSO AUTOMATION SCADA SOLUTIONS LTD.
and a further  name change to TELVENT  CANADA  LIMITED  (hereinafter  called the
"Sublandlord")   and  Anthony  Clark   International   Insurance   Brokers  Ltd.
(hereinafter called the "Subtenant") and per the extension of the Sublease dated
July 19,  2001;  the  Sublandlord  is prepared to renew the  Sublease as per the
following terms and conditions:

All terms shall be as the existing Sublease Agreement save and except following:

TERM
----

The Lease Term shall expire July 30, 2005 (one day less of the Headlease).

RENT
----

The  existing  Rent payable by the Tenant of $12.50 per square foot shall remain
for the duration of the Lease Term.

DEPOSIT
-------

The existing  deposit of Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars  ($8,750.00)
shall remain as stated till the expiry of Term.

SUBLANDLORD
-----------

The  Sublandlord  has a new corporate name of TELVENT CANADA LIMITD that will be
amended in the Sublease Agreement.

CONDITION OF LEASE EXTENSION
----------------------------

This proposal is subject to the final approval of the Landlord  within  fourteen
(14) business days of acceptance.

PARKING
-------

All parking contracts shall be directly with the Landlord.


<PAGE>


ACCEPTANCE
----------

This proposal is open for Acceptance by the Subtenant on or before February 21,
2004.


The above is fully accepted this 12th day of February, 2004.


                                          TELVENT CANADA LIMITED.


                                          /s/ [illegible]
                                          ------------------------------------


The above is fully accepted this 12th day of February, 2004.

                                          ANTHONY CLARK INTERNATIONAL
                                          INSURANCE BROKERS LTD.


                                          /s/ Tony Consalvo
                                          ------------------------------------
June 19, 1957

No. 60925.

Suit 4903.

#### United States *v.*Alltransport, Incorporated.

C. D. 1807 affirmed April 30, 1957. C. A. D. 653.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Burnett, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 365]

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), both rendered August 10, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 10810/93, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 11451/93, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that his pleas were not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered and, therefore, that the court should have granted his motion to withdraw his pleas. The court did misstate the potential sentences the defendant could have received as a persistent felony offender, by quoting the potential sentences for persistent violent felony offenders *(see,*Penal Law § 70.08 [2], [3]). However, the court nevertheless correctly informed the defendant of the possibility of facing a maximum sentence of 25 years to life imprisonment if the court exercised its discretion under Penal Law § 70.10 (2). Given that there are no other indicia that the pleas were not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9) and that the defendant has extensive experience with the criminal justice system, we do not believe that the court’s misstatement had any effect on the defendant’s decision to take the pleas *(cf, People v Gotte,*125 AD2d 331; *People v Camacho,*102 AD2d 728).

The court did not err in imposing enhanced sentences for the defendant’s failure to appear at sentencing *(see, People v Patterson,*211 AD2d 829; *People v Thorpe,*189 AD2d 903). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Order entered August 22, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00799

- CV

STRATA BV SWD, LLC ; BVCITI, LP; BVCITI GP, LLC; BV PARTNERS , LP; BV PARTNERS GP, LLC; TH OM AS A LEISER; PRYOR B LACKWELL; AND CHARLE S A. ANDERSON, Appellant s

V.

MARATHON OIL COMPANY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 17

- 14153



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ August 20 , 2019 unopposed motion to extend briefing

deadline by seven days

. Appellants explai n the “parties are currently working to schedule a

mediation.” We GRANT the motion and ORDER either the brief or a status report concerning

the mediation be filed no late r than August 27, 2019.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8326 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8326

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act with respect to the treatment 
        of dates for processing under certain marketing orders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2024

   Mr. Ruiz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act with respect to the treatment 
        of dates for processing under certain marketing orders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF DATES FOR PROCESSING UNDER MARKETING ORDERS.

    Section 8e(a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608e-
1(a)), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing 
Agreement Act of 1937, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``including dates for processing,'' after 
        ``dates,''; and
            (2) by striking ``, other than dates for processing,'' each 
        place it appears.
                                 <all>
```