alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.5**CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony J. Orlando, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MSW Energy Holdings II LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 3, 2006         By:                   /s/ Anthony J. Orlando    Anthony J. Orlando    Chief Executive Officer and President  
49
April 18, 1945

No. 50139.

Suit 4481.

#### United *States*v. *Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.*

Reap. Dec. 5991 affirmed March 5, 1945. C. A. D. 305.
#### EXCISE BOARD OF COAL COUNTY v. HAGAR et al.

No. 21170.

Opinion Filed Feb. 23, 1932.

*175Brunson, Kemp & Ahrens, for plaintiff in error.

E. Moore, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Coal county, Okla., in favor of M. M. Hagar et al., plaintiffs below, and against the excise board of Coal county, state of Oklahoma, defendant below, rendered on September 14, 1929, wherein and whereby the temporary restraining order was made permanent and the defendant enjoined from making and approving an estimate for the fiscal year 1929 and 1930, including school district No. 38, with union graded school district No. 1 of Coal county, Okla. From said judgment granting injunction, the excise board of Coal county duly perfected appeal to this court.

Plaintiff in error, in compliance with the rules and order of this court, on May 21, 1930, filed brief herein; the defendants in error, and each of them, have wholly failed to file answer brief, pleading, or any other instrument in said cause on appeal, within the time provided by the rules of this court, neither have the defendants in error, nor any of them, offered any excuse for their failure to do so.

> “Where plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in compliance with the rules of this court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for his failure to do so, this court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained, but may, where the authorities cited in the brief filed, appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause, with directions, in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.” City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233, 253 P. 481.

In this cause the petition in error prays that the judgment of the trial court be reversed, set aside, and held for naught, and that judgment be rendered in favor' of the plaintiff in error and against the defendants in error; and we find upon examination of the authorities cited in the brief filed herein, they reasonably support the contention of the plaintiff in error, and we therefore reverse the judgment of the lower court and direct that it vacate its former judgment and enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff in error as prayed for in the answer filed by the plaintiff in error in the trial court.

Note. — See under (1) 2 R. O. L. 176; R. O. L. Perm. Supp. p. 360.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 30, 2020

No. 04-19-00761-CV

IN RE THE COMMITMENT OF KEVIN JOHNSON,

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI23245

Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief is due on or before March 4, 2020. No further extensions will be granted absent 

extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
#### BELLEVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. TOWN OF BELLEVILLE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

See same case below: 93 *N. J. Super.*392.

*Messrs. Wolf, Baumann & Burstein*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Jaclc J. Soriano*for the respondent.

May 2, 1967.

Granted.
Exhibit 32
**CERTIFICATION**
Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Christopher Naughton, the President and Chief Executive Officer ofMarshall Edwards, Inc. (the “registrant”), and David R. Seaton, the Chief Financial Officer of theregistrant, each hereby certifies that, to his or her knowledge:
1.  The registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 2.  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by the PeriodicReport and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by the PeriodicReport.
These certifications accompany the Form 10-Q to which they relate, are not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
Dated: May 11, 2005   /s/ CHRISTOPHER NAUGHTON /s/ DAVID SEATON   Christopher Naughton David R. SeatonChief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
31
D
|  | **BOOKS** |
|--|-----------|
|  |
|  |

----

| **Links to other titles**
**Other Books**              - author index- title index

**CADRE Papers**              - author index- title index

**Fairchild Papers**              - author index- title index

**SAASS Theses**              - author index              - title index

**Maxwell Papers** *              - index

**Wright Flyer Papers** *              - index

* Available as downloads in PDF format only.

Distribution Policy**About this                title**
Aerospace Power in the Twenty-First                Century: A Basic PrimerClayton K. S. Chun
2001, 356 pages                ISBN: 1-58566-091-4                $29.00                
order no.                B-80 | download

 

In *Aerospace Power in the Twenty-First Century: A Basic                Primer*, Dr. Clayton K. S. Chun exposes readers to relevant aerospace                capabilities, theories, uses, elements of operational planning, and key issues.                After introducing basic definitions and concepts, Dr. Chun uses case studies of                both successful and unsuccessful applications of aerospace power to illustrate                its functions and abilities. Designed primarily for readers new to the subject, *Aerospace                Power in the Twenty-First Century* also serves as a useful source of                information about the strengths and weaknesses of air and space forces.

Next Title | Previous                Title | AU Press Home

**What do you think**? E-mail your comments about this title to Air                University Press  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of Mirae Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gi Hoon Joung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

Date: July 16, 2007 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto Mirae Corporation, and will be retained by Mirae Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

This certification will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will notbe deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 or the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is soincorporated by reference.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CARVEL RICE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 94 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 56 (Friday, March 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the 
Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal will hold a meeting 
on April 4, 2007, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance. The agenda 
for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Wednesday, April 4, 2007--10:30 a.m. until 5 p.m.

    The purpose of this meeting is to review the Pilgrim license 
renewal application and the associated Safety Evaluation Report. The 
Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with 
representatives of the NRC staff, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., and 
other interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will 
gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate 
proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the 
full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Ms. 
Maitri Banerjee (telephone 301/415-6973) five days prior to the 
meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. 
Electronic recordings will be permitted.
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 6:45 a.m. and 3:30 
p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact 
the above named individual at least two working days prior to the 
meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Cayetano Santos,
Acting Branch Chief, ACRS.
[FR Doc. E7-5335 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 32.10

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Frontier Diversified Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Frontier Diversified Series.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                         
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                             
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Diversified Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                           
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                            
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Diversified Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 11, 2010
No. 47451.

#### Protests 970503-G, etc., of L. Bamberger & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Order entered February 4, 2020

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00771

- CV

ANDREA M. REYES, Appellant

V.

GUADALUPE TORRES AND ROSALINDA SILVA, Appellee s

On Appea l from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 17

- 13110



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellees’ January 31, 2020 second motion for extension of time to

file their responsive brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the b rief be filed no later than

March 5, 2020. We caution appellees that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 10.2

                    FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of
January 24, 2001, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
("Employer") and Thomas Martin ("Executive").


                                    RECITALS

A)     On March 31, 1998 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by
       and between Employer and Executive.

B)     On March 31, 1999 a First Amendment to Employment Agreement was made and
       entered into by and between Employer and Executive.

C)     On November 22, 1999, a Second Amendment to Employment Agreement was made
       and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.

D)     On January 11, 2000, a Third Amendment to Employment Agreement was made
       and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.

E)     Employer and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as
       set forth hereinbelow:

                                    AGREEMENT

1)     Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement, which provides:

       3.1 TERM. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on
       April 1, 1998 and shall continue until March 31, 2001 unless sooner
       terminated or extended as hereinafter provided (the "Employment Term").

    is hereby amended, effective as of January 24, 2001, to provide as follows:

       3.1 TERM. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on
       April 1, 1998 and shall continue until March 31, 2002 unless sooner
       terminated or extended as hereinafter provided (the "Employment Term").

<PAGE>


2)     All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain
       unaltered and fully effective.


Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.


EXECUTIVE                                    EMPLOYER

                                      PRICESMART, INC.

Thomas Martin                         By: /s/ Gilbert A. Partida
                                          ----------------------------------
/s/ Thomas Martin                     Name:  Gilbert A. Partida
-------------------------             Its: President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,566]


E*Trade Mortgage Corporation; Including Leased Workers From 
Manpower and Radian; Coraopolis, PA; Dismissal of Application for 
Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at E*Trade Mortgage Corporation, 
including leased workers from Manpower and Radian, Coraopolis, 
Pennsylvania. The application did not contain new information 
supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also 
did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the 
determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the 
application was issued.

TA-W-60,566; E *Trade Mortgage Corporation Including Leased Workers 
From Manpower and Radian, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania (March 15, 2007).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of March 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-5846 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Johnson, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 507]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered April 19, 1994, convicting him of assault in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

It was not error to deny the defendant’s request for a miss*661ing witness charge with respect to the two barbers who were present during the assault. The defendant failed to demonstrate that the missing witnesses, who knew the defendant as well as the complainants, "would naturally be expected to testify in support of the People’s position and adversely to the defendant’s case” *(People v Gonzalez,*68 NY2d 424, 431; *see, People v Westcott,*158 AD2d 733). In addition, the request was untimely *(see, People v Gonzalez, supra,*at 428; *People v Bradley,*160 AD2d 808).

The sentence that was imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Krausman, JJ., concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved inthe event that publications are no longer available from the originalpublishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report**
 
1996 (InternetArchive copy) | 1997 | 1999
2000 | 2001| 2002| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010
 
SuDoc Number:E 2.1:

Item Number:0429-V-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000552147
 
June 29, 2020