alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with amendment no. 1 to the annual report of Mirae
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the year ending December 31,
2003, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Hyung Yun Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: June 30, 2004


/s/ Hyung Yun Lee
---------------------------
Hyung Yun Lee
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mirae Corporation, and will be retained by Mirae Corporation and
furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 or the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted
to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

MICHELLE BRAUN, ON BEHALF OF

HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Petitioner

v.

WAL

- MART STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND SAM'S CLUB, AN OPERATING

SEGMENT OF WAL

- MART STORES, INC.,

Respondents

---------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------ DOLORES HUMMEL, ON BEHALF OF

HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Petitioner

v.

WAL

- MART STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND SAM'S CLUB, AN OPERATING

SEGMENT OF WAL

- MART STORES, INC.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 327 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

MICHELLE BRAUN, ON BEHALF OF

HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, :

:

:

: No. 328 EAL 2018[ 327 EAL 2018 and 328 EAL 2018 ]

- 2 Petitioner

v.

WAL

- MART STORES, INC., A

DELAWARE CORPORATION AND SAM'S CLUB, AN OPERATING SEGMENT OF

WAL

- MART STORES, INC.,

Respondents

---------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------- DOLORES HUMMEL, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF

AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Petitioner

v.

WAL

- MART STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND SAM'S CLUB, AN OPERATI NG

SEGMENT OF WAL

- MART STORES, INC.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 841 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 841

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow a surviving spouse of a 
Medal of Honor recipient to receive a special pension concurrently with 
     dependency and indemnity compensation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

   Mr. Morelle (for himself, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, and Mr. Carson) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow a surviving spouse of a 
Medal of Honor recipient to receive a special pension concurrently with 
     dependency and indemnity compensation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sergeant Gary Beikirch Medal of 
Honor Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF MEDAL OF HONOR SPECIAL PENSION PROVISIONS TO 
              ALLOW CONCURRENT BENEFITS.

    Section 1562(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subparagraph (C).
                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 16, 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01182

- CV

DEBBIE WHEELER, INDI VIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E

ESTATE OF LARRY WHEE LER, K IM ADAMS, AND KRISTI E STEWART, Appellant s

V.

METHODIST RICHARDSON MEDICAL CENTER AND

METHODIST HEALTH SYS TEM FOUNDATION, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 01327

- 2016



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ November 14, 2018 unopposed motion for an extension of

time to file a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to November 21, 2018.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
EX-10.4(b)



 Exhibit 10.4(b) 
 June 1, 2014 
 Willowbridge Associates Inc. 

101 Morgan Lane - Suite 180 
 Plainsboro, N.J.
08536 
 Attention: Mr Steve R. Crane 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Crane: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below
(the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2015 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Willowbridge Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio LP 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mrs. Alice Lonero at the address
above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1304. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Alice Lonero
		 	  

		 	 Alice Lonero
 Chief Financial
Officer 

	
	WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Steven R. Crane
		 	  



			
		
	Print Name:	 	 Steven R. Crane



			
		
	AL/sr
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the 
ACRS Subcommittee on Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Digital Instrumentation and Control 
Systems will hold a meeting on April 18, 2007, Room T-2B3, 11545 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
Wednesday, April 18, 2007--8:30 a.m. Until the Conclusion of Business
    The Subcommittee will (1) review DL-1151, Risk-Informed Digital 
System Reviews and (2) discuss issues related to the SRM assignment on 
digital systems. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff regarding this 
matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant 
issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as 
appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Charles G. Hammer, (Telephone: 301-415-7363) five days prior to the 
meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. 
Electronic recordings will be permitted.
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 6:45 a.m. and 3:30 
p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact 
the above named individual at least two working days prior to the 
meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: March 22, 2007.
Michael Junge,
Acting Branch Chief, ACRS.
[FR Doc. E7-5660 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
**Exhibit 21**

 

Subsidiariesof the Registrant

 
| **Legal  Name of Entity**                   | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Organization** | ** ** | **Ownership Interest**     |
|---------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|
| Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc (registrant) |       | Virginia                         |       |                       |
| Virginia  Commerce Bank                     |       | Virginia                         |       | 100%                       |
| Northeast  Land and Investment Company      |       | Virginia                         |       | 100%                       |
| Virginia  Commerce Insurance Agency, L.L.C. |       | Virginia                         |       | 100%                       |
| VCBI Capital  Trust II                      |       | Delaware                         |       | 100% of  voting securities |
| VCBI Capital  Trust III                     |       | Delaware                         |       | 100% of  voting securities |
| VCBI Capital  Trust IV                      |       | Delaware                         |       | 100% of  voting securities |

 

----
AMENDMENT TO
                                THE TALBOTS, INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


                  Effective  as of July 1,  2001,  The  Talbots,  Inc.  Deferred
Compensation Plan is amended as follows:

                  1. New Section 3A is added to the Plan,  following  the end of
Section 3, as follows:

                  "3A Deferral and Payment of Salary

                  A Participant  can elect to defer his or her Salary,  in whole
number  percentages from 1% to 100%, by completing and submitting to the Company
a deferral  election form at such times as are prescribed by the Company.  In no
event may a deferral election apply to Salary that has already been earned.  For
purposes  of  this  Section  3A,  "Salary"  shall  mean  a  Participant's   base
compensation  (after reduction for deferrals made pursuant to Section 401(k) and
125 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended), but not including bonuses
or incentive compensation.

                  Deferred Salary amounts will be paid to the Participant in the
form of a lump  sum  upon  his or her  termination  of  employment,  unless  the
Participant otherwise elects pursuant to rules established by the Administrative
Committee."

                  2.  Section 5 is amended by changing  the caption to "Deferred
Accounts."

                  3. The first  sentence  of  Section 5 is amended by adding the
words "or deferred  Salary  account"  following  the words  "deferred  incentive
compensation account."
(Reap. Dec. 10179)

#### Financial Ventures, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 854137.

(Decided February 20, 1962)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Wülmm B. Orrioh, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(Morris Braverman,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

This appeal to reappraisement has been submitted for decision on the following stipulation of facts:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties to this action, subject to the approval of the court, that:

> 1. The merchandise consists of cooked frozen beef exported from Argentina on or about November 9, 1959 and imported into the United States on November 24,1959.

> *5712. That the merchandise is not listed in the “Final List” effective on February 27, 1958, T.D. 54521 and is therefore subject to appraisement under the provisions of section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 3. That neither such nor similar merchandise is freely offered or sold in the principal markets of Argentina for exportation to the United States, nor in the principal markets of the United States for domestic consumption.

> 4. That there is no controversy between the parties as to the statutory computation of constructed value as provided for in section 402(d) except that the parties hereby stipulated that the general expenses as computed by the Appraiser were overstated by $0.0938 per kilo; adjustment for this overstatement reduces the said constructed value to $1.1211 per kilo packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above appeal for reappraisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that constructed value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 948, is the proper basis for determination of value of the cooked frozen beef, described in the invoice and entry of this appeal, and that such value is $1.1211 per kilo, net, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
NUMBER 13-15-00184-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

PROSPERITY ENERGY 

CORPORATION, Appellant,

v.

TERFAM FAMILY, LTD. 

AND LAMBERT QUARTEY, Appellees.

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.
NUMBER 13-15-00234-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE PROSPERITY ENERGY CORPORATION

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

On May 19, 2015, appellant Prosperity Energy Corporation filed both a petition for 

writ of mandamus and appellant’s interlocutory brief in cause number 13-15-00184-CV. 

We docket the petition for writ of mandamus in our cause number 13-15-00234-CV. We 

request that appellees and real parties in interest, Terfam Family, Ltd. and Lambert 

Quartey, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus within ten days of the date 

of this order. The response may be filed as a separate pleading in cause number 13-15-
00234-CV or as a combined response as part of appellees’ brief in cause number 13-15-

00184-CV. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

21st day of May, 2015.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WALTER A. SELTMANN, DECEASED. MONTCLAIR NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ELAINE C. BARNWELL, CLAIMANT-RESPONDENT, AND JOSEF FREDERICK SELTMANN, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT.

Argued April 6, 1964

Decided June 22, 1964.

*Mr. Verling G. Enieman*argued the cause for claimant-appellant *(Mr. Andrew 8. Polito,*of counsel).

*Mr. Nicholas H. Politan*argued the cause for claimant-respondent *(Messrs. Checki and Politan,*attorneys).

*498The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

The testator executed his will in 1936 and died shortly thereafter. The question is whether a child adopted by the testator’s son is a “child” of the son within the meaning of the will. On motion for summary judgment the trial court held the adopted child was not, relying upon *In re*Wehrhane, 33 *N. J.*205 (1957). We certified the appeal before argument in the Appellate Division.

The case is controlled by the opinion filed today in *In re Coe,*42 *N. J.*485 (1964), and for the reasons there given the judgment must be reversed. The respondent, who is the natural daughter of the testator’s son, states that she has competent evidence to show the testator did not intend her adopted brother to take, and asks that if the judgment should be reversed, she be afforded an opportunity to* offer proof she did not present because it was unnecessary in the light of the trial court’s ruling. She should be afforded that opportunity. We of course intimate no view as to what evidence, if any, is admissible to that end.

The judgment is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Hall, J.

(dissenting). I would affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion filed today in *In re*Coe, 42 *N. J.*485 (1964).

*For reversal*— Chief Justice Weintkaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eranois, Proctor, Sohettino and Hahemaw — 6.

*For affirmance*— Justice Hall — 1.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-41019

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUADALUPE REYNA-MEDINA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-540-1

Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Reyna-Medina has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Reyna-Medina has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 21, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
#### JOHN VIALE, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. JOSEPH LIVIGNI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Messrs. Gelman & Gelman*for the petitioner.

*Mr. A. Leo Bohl*for the respondent.

May 29, 1967.

Denied.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

        In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BlackDiamond Industries, Inc., for the year ended October 31, 2002, I, Ben Marcovitch,President of Black Diamond Industries, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

        (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2002,fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for theyear ended October 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Black Diamond Industries, Inc.

Black Diamond Industries, Inc.Date: December 6, 2002

/s/ Ben MarcovitchBy: Ben MarcovitchPresident

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

        In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BlackDiamond Industries, Inc., for the year ended October 31, 2002, I, JosephFasciglione, Secretary and Treasurer of Black Diamond Industries, Inc. herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

        (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2002,fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for theyear ended October 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Black Diamond Industries, Inc.

Black Diamond Industries, Inc.Date: December 6, 2002

/s/ Joseph FasciglioneBy: Joseph FasciglioneSecretary and Treasurer
No. 38931.

#### Protests 857631-G, etc., of Oceanic Linen Importing Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Od the authority of *United States*v. *Field*(25 C. C. P. A. 308, T. D. 49422) and *Anniston*v. *Davis*(301 U. S. 337) the protesta were dismissed.
(Reap. Dec. 9571)

#### Sears, Roebuck and Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 3276, etc.

(Decided December 23, 1959)

■Lewie, *Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

MollisoN, Judge:

Counsel have stipulated and agreed in these cases as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reappraisement consists of bamboo blinds, bamboo porch shades, and sets of hardware accessories imported from Japan; and that each bamboo blind and porch shade, as invoiced, is accompanied by one set of hardware accessories.

> That on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise hereinbefore described, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, at the entered unit values; that said unit values include the cost of the sets of hardware accessories, which cost is 3 cents (U.S. Cy) per set of hardware accessories; and that there was no higher foreign value.

> That the above appeals for reappraisement are limited to the merchandise here-inbefore described and are abandoned as to all other merchandise; and that said appeals may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Accepting the foregoing stipulation as establishing the facts therein recited, I conclude that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved, and that such value in each case is the entered unit value, which includes the cost of 3 cents (U.S. currency) *589of each set of hardware accessories accompanying each bamboo blind or porch shade.

Judgment will issue accordingly.