alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2005 of Universal Communication Systems, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.

Date: January 13, 2006

| |                                                        
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ MICHAELJ. ZWEBNER                                  
| | Michael J. Zwebner
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.16


 


Amendment Agreement


 


Party A: Anhui Renrenjia Solar Energy Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Anhui Haishuai Electronic Manufacture
Co., Ltd.


 


In regarding to the ¥13,500,000
loan agreement signed by both parties on Jan 01, 2012, both parties signed the following amendment agreement in Nov 30, 2012.


 


		1.	Both parties are willing to support each other with cash loans.



		2.	The interests of all the loans between Party A and Party B shall be waived.



		3.	The term of this amendment is one year. By the end of the term, agreed by both parties, this amendment
agreement shall extend for one year. This amendment agreement shall be terminated on Nov 30, 2015 if both parties discontinue to
sign this agreement.



 


 


Party A: Anhui Renrenjia Solar Energy Co., Ltd.


 


Signature:


 


Nov 30, 2012


 


 


Party B: Anhui Haishuai Electronic Manufacture
Co., Ltd.


 


Signature:


 


Nov 30, 2012
#### DAVID COOPER, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. THE MAPLEWOOD CLUB, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

April 27, 1964. Granted.

*Messrs. Schapira, Steiner & Schapira*and *Mr. Joel Sondak*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Van Riper & Belmont*and *Mr. Charles E. Villaneuva*for the respondents.

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Pacific Fuel Cell Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C./ Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
| Dated:  April 3, 2007 | s/Ken Inouye                                                     |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Ken Inouye, Secretary/Treasurer |
|--------|---------------------------------|
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21

                                 SUBSIDIARIES



THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF THE COMPANY'S SUBSIDIARIES:

                                                         Percentage of Voting
                                                         Securities Owned By
                                     Organized            Keane, Inc. as of
          Name                     Under Laws of          December 31, 1997
          ----                     -------------          -----------------

Dataskills, Inc.                     Massachusetts              100%

Keane Federal Systems, Inc.            Delaware                 100%

Keane Canada, Inc.                      Canada                  100%

169963 Canada, Inc.                     Canada                  100%

Keane Securities Corporation         Massachusetts              100%

Keane Technology Company              California                100%

Keane Technology Services Company     California                100%

Keane Pittsburg, Inc.                Pennsylvania               100%
#### The People *ex rel.*John Andrews, Resp’t, *v.*John C. McGuire, Registrar of Arrears, App’lt.

*(City Court of Brooklyn, General Term,*

*Filed February 24, 1890.)*

1. Mandamus—Issue not joined by denial upon want of information.

Allegations in answering affidavits of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of positive statements in the moving affidavit, do not raise an issue.

.3. Taxes—Sale.

Relator was the owner of lot Ro. 113, block 64, of the twenty-fifth ward of Brooklyn, upon a portion of which a tax was levied. Thereafter defendant sold a parcel of land in said ward described as block 54, lot 113 pt. *Feld,*that this failed to give any notice to the owner of lot 113, and that said lot 113 was not legally sold, or sold at all, and that plaintiff had aright to redeem.

Appeal from order granting a writ of *mandamus.*

*John*Andrews, for resp’t; *Almet F.*Jenks, for app’lt.

Yaw Wyck, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the special ■term of this court directing the issuance of a writ of *mandamus*to •the registrar of arrears to receive from relator the amount of an assessment tax lien filed by the assessors upon “ lot 112,” block 54, of the twenty-fifth ward, with interest thereon from the date it was .so fixed, and upon receipt of such tax and interest to mark the :same paid and cancelled by some appropriate entry upon the books or records of his office.

The primary duty of the registrar is to receive and receipt for •taxes in arrears. Laws 1883, chap. 114, § 3.

To defeat this order¡ the registrar insists, first, that there was an issue of fact raised by the allegation in his deputy’s affidavit that 'he had no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to 'the truth of the positive statement in the affidavit of relator 'that he was the owner of the premises. We cannot assent to such a proposition. *People ex rel. Harriman*v. Paton, 20 Abb. N. C., 195; 5 N. Y. State Rep.,313; *People ex rel. Carleton*v. *Assessors,*52 How., 140. *Second.*The registrar insists that he had sold the premises in question for the tax sought to be paid. If true, it would defeat the order.

He advertised and sold a parcel of land in Twenty-fifth ward under the following description, viz.: Block 54, “lot 112 pt.” The registrar now contends that there was no “lot 112 pt.” in ■that ward, therefore, the owner was bound to know it was his lot 112. That the cabalistic “ pt.” was used by him to mean “ part ” *675of lot 112 in arrears for tax, without designating what part, and that this meaning should have been thought of by the relator when he examined the advertised list of lots to be sold. This notice of sale should receive no such construction, for it certainly fails to give any information to owner of “ lot 112 ” that his lot was to be sold, or was being sold, if he had been present at the alleged sale. We do not think that lot 112 has been legally sold, or sold at all. “Lot 112 pt.” has been sold, but we are not called upon to determine whether there is such a lot, or whether it was properly sold.

For the foregoing reasons the order must be affirmed, with costs.

Osborne, J., concurs.
No. 54739.

#### C. S. Emery & Company *v.*United States,

protest 145756-K (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wool flocks the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Walker Services*v. *United States*(24 Cust. Ct. 190, C. D. 1230), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8366 

To extend authorities to impose sanctions under certain laws relating to 

Hong Kong, Tibet, and the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2024 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. MCGOVERN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, 

and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To extend authorities to impose sanctions under certain laws 

relating to Hong Kong, Tibet, and the Xinjiang Uyghur 

Autonomous Region. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES TO IMPOSE SANC4 TIONS UNDER CERTAIN LAWS RELATING TO 

5 HONG KONG, TIBET, AND THE XINJIANG 

6 UYGHUR AUTONOMOUS REGION. 

7 (a) HONG KONG HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY

8 ACT OF 2019.—Section 7(h) of the Hong Kong Human 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8366 IH

1 Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 (Public Law 116–76; 

2 22 U.S.C. 5701 note) is amended by striking ‘‘5 years’’ 

3 and inserting ‘‘10 years’’. 

4 (b) AN ACT TO PROHIBIT THE COMMERCIAL EX5 PORT OF COVERED MUNITIONS ITEMS TO THE HONG

6 KONG POLICE FORCE.—Section 3 of the Act entitled ‘‘An 

7 Act to prohibit the commercial export of covered munitions 

8 items to the Hong Kong Police Force’’, approved Novem9 ber 27, 2019 (Public Law 116–77; 133 Stat. 1173), is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘shall expire’’ and all that follows 

11 and inserting ‘‘shall expire on December 31, 2029.’’. 

12 (c) RECIPROCAL ACCESS TO TIBET ACT OF 2018.— 

13 The Reciprocal Access to Tibet Act of 2018 (Public Law 

14 115–330; 8 U.S.C. 1182 note) is amended— 

15 (1) in section 4(a), in the matter preceding 

16 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the following five years’’ 

17 and inserting ‘‘the following 10 years’’; and 

18 (2) in section 5(c), in the first sentence, by 

19 striking ‘‘the following five years’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

20 following 10 years’’. 

21 (d) UYGHUR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY ACT OF

22 2020.—Section 6(h) of the Uyghur Human Rights Policy 

23 Act of 2020 (Public Law 116–145; 22 U.S.C. 6901 note) 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8366 IH

1 is amended by striking ‘‘5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘10 

2 years’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
■
	



■
	







	


		



	



	











	





	






 











!






"





		

		






		

#
$









	









%$


		


&





	




'

	
		

$




(







"





	



)&*

'



	


+	





	









,

 	


 
	










	



-



!


	







 


 .





)$!


	












	+	
	

	

/









 


 ! *
	












		

 
"!#$%%& +





'





&



		



$


 '(	

 
)* 0!

!




%
	


!





	



  +

%
+,*
-
+-
+ &



&






	






+




$


		



	


	





 		


)
	





)&*

!





	













1





	0

0




2
0
!"

'
	

1
34'5'"1'5657&	












/


		
+



+
+

&)&*	


	


	











	






&	






	
	

	4


'		



34'588'95:';987



	&)&*












	

	'




*.







	



	

-.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-56,013-13

EX P ARTE JOHN RAY NELSON, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. C-213-W011486- 0548443-M IN THE 213 DISTRICT COURT

T H F ROM TARRA NT COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Tex as C o d e o f Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung, 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenc ed to thirty

year s’ imprisonment. Applicant conte nds that he has “31 year s on paper and they g ive me no re lease date.” This ground is denied. See generally Ex parte Molina, 483 S.W .3d 24, 27, 28 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). Applicant also contends that he rec eived ineffe ctive assistance of trial counsel and that he is fac tually innocent bec ause he had alibi and mi staken identity defe nses. These grounds were or should have2

been raised in his previous writs. There fore , these grounds are dismiss ed. This Court has previously enter ed an abuse- of-the- writ order in this cause , and Applicant has failed to show that he could not have pr esente d these grounds in a pre vious application. Acc ording ly , this application is denied in part a nd dismiss ed in par

t. Filed: May

22, 2019 Do Not Publish
Before the Second Division,

May 17, 1960

No. 64203.

protests 229858-K, etc. (New York).

#### S. P. Skinner Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of log fires similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. S. *P. Skinner Co., Inc.*(46 C.C.P.A. 105, C.A.D. 708), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 13.1


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of ebookers plc (the
     "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
     Dinesh Dhamija, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
     to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



     Date: June 27, 2003



                                           /s/__Dinesh Dhamija___

                                                Dinesh Dhamija

                                                Chief Executive Officer






                                       97
No. 58619.

protest 227629-K (New York).

#### Alpha Photo Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff, and the protest was ordered dismissed for lack of prosecution. Subsequently, upon Government’s application, the matter was continued for 1 month to permit the plaintiff to move to vacate the order of dismissal and to hear the case on the merits. No motion for the restoration of the protest to the calendar having been made by the plaintiff within the period allowed, the order for dismissal was ordered to stand.
#### The People of the State of New York, *v.*Pasquale Majone, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Daniels, J.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8493 

To establish the Task Force to Stop Price Gouging, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2024 

Ms. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, and 

Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To establish the Task Force to Stop Price Gouging, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Task Force to Stop 

5 Price Gouging Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TASK FORCE TO STOP PRICE GOUGING. 

7 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established a task 

8 force (to be known as the ‘‘Task Force to Stop Price 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8493 IH

1 Gouging’’) to address unfair and illegal pricing issues af2 fecting consumers in the United States. 

3 (b) MEMBERS.—The task force established by sub4 section (a) shall be comprised of the following: 

5 (1) Representatives of the Department of Jus6 tice, appointed by the Attorney General. 

7 (2) Representatives of the Federal Trade Com8 mission, appointed by the Chair of the Commission. 

9 (3) Representatives of the Department of Agri10 culture, appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture. 

11 (c) DUTIES.—The task force established by sub12 section (a) shall carry out the following: 

13 (1) Investigate, and publish legislative rec14 ommendations with respect to, actions to— 

15 (A) strengthen interagency efforts to ad16 dress anti-competitive, unfair, deceptive, or 

17 fraudulent business practices that increase 

18 prices for families in the United States; 

19 (B) prevent consolidation in the food sec20 tor; and 

21 (C) counteract food price manipulation 

22 throughout the supply chain. 

23 (2) Not later than 180 days after the date of 

24 the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days there25 after, submit to Congress a report that— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 8493 IH

1 (A) describes interagency efforts to ad2 dress anti-competitive, unfair, deceptive, or 

3 fraudulent business practices that increase 

4 prices for families in the United States; 

5 (B) describes the effect of Federal Govern6 ment spending on food prices; 

7 (C) describes actions taken to streamline 

8 Federal Government spending with respect to 

9 the food sector to strengthen the supply chain 

10 and support families in the United States; and 

11 (D) analyzes input costs with respect to 

12 producers, manufacturers, and retailers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 21









Subsidiaries of Ableauctions.com, Inc.



Unlimited Closeouts Inc.

Ojai, California

Icollector International, Ltd.

Buffalo, New York and Fife, Washington

Ableauctions.com (Washington) Inc.

Fife, Washington

iTrustee.com International, Ltd.

Fife, Washington



Our operations in Canada include:

Able Auctions (1991) Ltd.

Coquitlam, British Columbia

Jarvis Industries Ltd.

Coquitlam, British Columbia

Icollector.com Technologies, Ltd.

Ontario and Coquitlam, British Columbia

Rapidfusion Technologies Inc.

Coquitlam, British Columbia

652297 B.C. Ltd

Coquitlam, British Columbia

iTrustee.com Technologies Ltd.

Coquitlam, British Columbia
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          35,067                  34,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,493                   1,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,296                     217
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,074                     951
<PP&E>                                          39,604                   4,648
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,695                     368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,583                  73,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,884                  17,634
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          180,933                  53,075
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             2                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (29,502)                 (5,881)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   199,583                  73,025
<SALES>                                         39,294                   3,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,294                   3,348
<CGS>                                           19,211                   1,853
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,211                   1,853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,012                   7,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,455                      29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (30,930)                 (5,487)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (65)                    145
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (30,995)                 (5,342)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (30,995)                 (5,342)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (28.55)                 (24.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (28.55)                 (24.29)



</TABLE>