alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given of a change in the location of a meeting of the National Science Board Commission on 21st Century Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. The meeting, originally set for January 18, 2007, from 8 a.m.-5 p.m. to be held at the Arizona State Capitol, 1700 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007 (published in Vol. 71 FR 78227, December 28, 2006) will be held at the same time at the Hyatt Regency Phoenix, 122 North Second Street, Phoenix, Arizona, USA 85004. Telephone: 602-252-1234 

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                 

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     The purpose of this meeting is for the Commission to discuss its draft recommendations relating to K-12 STEM education. A provisional agenda for the meeting will be available at                     *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​edu-com/​.*

*Contact Person:*                     Dr. Elizabeth Strickland, Commission Executive Secretary, National Science Board Office, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,                           ( print page 1778)                        Arlington, VA 22230; Phone: 703-292-4527, E-mail                     *estrickl@nsf.gov.*

Russell Moy, 

Attorney-Advisor.

[FR Doc. E7-558 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
No. 61924.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protest 316233-K/15045 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of decorated chinaware figures, not tableware, not containing 25 percent or more of calcined bone, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### FRIEDA KAPLAN, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Messrs.*Lucianna, *Federico & Sandow*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Breslin c& Monaghan*for the respondent.

April 30, 1968.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Astralis
Ltd. (the "Company"), certifies that:

(1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: March 30, 2005                               /s/ James Sharpe
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    James Sharpe
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


Dated: March 30, 2005                               /s/ Michael Garone
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Michael Garone
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

      This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
No. 41859.

#### Protest 986071-G of B. Altman & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel trays,, inkstands, bookends, corners, letter openers, blotters, letter racks, bookstands, calendars, and letter scales chiefly used on the table in the kitchen or in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 47857) cited.
Exhibit 10.4 

**DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENT WITH CEO**

Mr. Converseand the Personnel and Compensation Committee have an oral agreement to provide him with a change in control agreement, which would pay him one year of base salary in the event of his termination or certain other events, following a change in controlof the Company. This agreement has been in effect since Mr. Converse joined the Bank in 1994. 

The Company’s abilityto pay or accrue this amount during the period that the U.S. Department of Treasury (“Treasury”) holds any of the Company’s preferred stock issued in the Capital Purchase Program transaction is significantly limited by theTreasury’s executive compensation restrictions applicable to companies that participated in the Capital Purchase Program (the “TARP Standards”). The TARP Standards generally prohibit the Company from making any payments to the namedexecutive officers and the Company’s next five most highly compensated employees for departure from the Company or upon most change in control events, other than compensation earned for services rendered or accrued benefits.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ChinaCast Education Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Antonio Sena, Chief Financial Officer of ChinaCast Education Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ChinaCast Education Corporation.





Dated August 9, 2011
/s/ Antonio SenaAntonio SenaChief Financial Officer (Principal

Accounting and Financial Officer)
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No s

. 02

- 19

- 00402

- CR 02

- 19

- 00403

- CR

On Appeal from the 371st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1567850D, 1567852D

ORDER

On the court’s own motion, it is ORDERED that the trial court clerk deliver
the original of State's Exhibits No. 21 (Computer diskette containing body camera
recording) to this court no later than Tuesday, April 13, 2021

. The exhibit will be returned to the trial court upon issuance of the mandate.

We direct the clerk of this court to send a notice of this order to the attorneys
of record, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter.

Dated April 6, 2021

.



### R UDY 

### R ODRIGUEZ 

### , Appellant

V



### .

T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 Per Curiam
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Trans-Century Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mary W. Patterson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Mary W. Patterson
---------------------
Mary W. Patterson
Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  July 8, 2003
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00387

- CV

In the Interest of H.M. P., Minor Child
On Appeal from the 25th District Court of Lavaca County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2017

- 06

- 23582CV

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant , although she is exempt from payment due to her inability to pay
costs

. We further order this decision certified below for observan ce. November 8, 2018
April 25, 1949

No. 53086.

Suit 4595.

#### Cummins-Collins Distilleries *v.*United States.

C. D. 1090 affirmed March 1, 1949. C. A. D. 403.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Mayflower Communications Company, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63859

)

Under Contract No. W56JSR-20-D-0021 

Delivery Order Nos. W56JSR-20-F-0126 

W56JSR-21-F-0020 

)

) 

)

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Edmund M. Amorosi, Esq.

 Haynes and Boone, LLP

 Tysons Corner, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Dana J. Chase, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

CPT Blaine L. Hutchison, JA

LTC Nolan Koon, JA

 Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The parties have jointly requested that this appeal be dismissed without prejudice. 

Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Unless either party or the 

Board acts to reinstate the appeal within one year from the date of this Order, the 

dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. 

Dated: April 9, 2024 

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63859, Appeal of Mayflower 

Communications Company, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: April 9, 2024

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Inconnection with the Form 10-K of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006, I,Peter A. Converse , Chief Executive Officer of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc.,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) theinformation contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006,fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
|  /s/  Peter A. Converse |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Peter A. Converse            |
| Chief Executive Officer      |

 

----
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK *v.*THE ROCKAWAY BEACH IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, (Limited).

*Moira allowance*— *it cannot be granted unless the value of the subject-matter involved be*shown— *in an action to dissolve a corporation it must be baaed on the value of the corporate franchise.*

This action was brought to dissolve a corporation, to restrain it from exercising its franchises and to procure the appointment of a receiver. An answer, put in by the defendant, was subsequently withdrawn, and judgment was taken against it by default.

*357Upon an appeal from an order granting an extra allowance:

*Held,*that as the subject-matter involved was the existence of the franchise any allowance must be based upon its value, and that as no proof was given to show that the franchise had any value, the court erred in granting an extra allowance.

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term, granting an extra allowance.

*■John L.*Cadwalader, for certain creditors and stockholders, appellants.

*Jno. C. Keeler,*deputy attorney-general, for the respondent.

Learned, P. J.:

The order granting an extra allowance recites that it was made on notice served upon, among others, Mr. Cadwalader, attorney for divers creditors and stockholders. . So far as he was attorney for creditors and stockholders we think he had a right to appeal from an order made on notice to him; and we cannot dismiss the appeal.

The action was brought to dissolve the defendant, a corporation ; to restrain it from exercising its functions and to appoint a receiver. An answer was put in and withdrawn, and judgment was taken for want of an answer.

There was no sum recovered or claimed. What was the value of the subject-matter involved? (Code Civ. Pro., § 3253.) The matter involved was not the property of the corporation. No one disputed their title to that. All that was involved was the existence of the franchise. *(O. and L. C. R. R.*v. *V. and C. R. R.,*63 N. Y., 177; *People*v. *N. Y. amd S. I. Ferry Co.,*68 id., 72.) There is no proof that the franchise had any value. And therefore there was nothing upon which the extra allowance of $500 could be calculated. The allowance must have assumed that the franchise was worth $100,000. Nothing shows that it was worth one cent.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Learned, P. J., and Bocees, J.; Westbrook, J., not sitting.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and motion denied with ten dollars costs.
No. 46206.

#### Petitions 6042-R, etc., of Mexican Products Co. (Laredo).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that the advances-in this case resulted from the disallowance of certain discounts. From a careful consideration of the evidence the court was of the opinion that in making the entries the petitioner was without *246intention to conceal or misrepresent tlie facts or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petitions were therefore granted.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-311-001]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Gas Tariff Filing

March 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 19, 2007, Northern Border Pipeline 
Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets attached to the 
filing, to become effective April 1, 2007.
    Northern Border states that the purpose of this filing is to 
substitute certain tariff sheets that Northern Border filed on February 
27, 2007 at Docket No. RP07-311-000 to reflect a change in the name of 
the operator of Northern Border to TransCanada Northern Border Inc.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c2a293e2f2302000502093f191c1c031e182c0a091e0f420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7f1f2e5f4f8d9dbded9d2e4c2c7c7d8c5c3f7d1d2c5d499d0d8c1">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5520 Filed 3-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
_"_1_

LARAMIE REGIONAL

AIRPORT

55.5General Brees Road' Laramie, Wyoming 82070 • Office: (307) 742-4164 • FAX: 742-3303 • skinner@laramieairport.com

Michael Martin

Transportation Industry Analyst

Office of Aviation Analysis

US Department of Transportation

400 Seventh Street, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20590

RE: USDOT Essential Air Service Bids for Laramie, Wyoming

Dear Mr. Martin:

June 16,2014

The Laramie Regional Airport Board (LRAB) strongly supports the application of SkyWest Airlines

to provide Essential Air Service to the Laramie Regional Airport.

The LRAB and the Laramie community have been extremely satisfied with SkyWest Airlines over

the last two years. Immediately after SkyWest was awarded the EAS bid (approximately two years

ago) the traveling public's confidence in reliable air service increased dramatically. SkyWest's tie-in

with United Airlines, the ease of booking flights in and out of Laramie, and the fare advantages we

have with a United Express carrier, have been large factors in our increased passenger numbers over

the last two years. The increased passenger loads we've experienced over the last two years proves

that an air carrier that is reliable, customer service oriented, and that provides a competitive air fare

can be successful in a community like Laramie and does make a difference.

The LRAB is also excited about the possibility of SkyWest utilizing a 50-seat regional jet to serve

Laramie. We feel the introduction of this aircraft into our community would greatly enhance the

travel experience and our passenger numbers would continue to increase.

LRAB is excited to continue to work with, market, and support SkyWest Airlines as Laramie's air

carrier. Thank you for considering our comments.

Sincerely,

P:z~

Board Chairman
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00230-CV

Dalisa, Inc. and Enchanted Rock Pictures, L.P., Appellants

v. Lawren E. Bradford, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN002569, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On July 11, 2003, this Court, responding to the parties’ request for an extension of
time due to settlement negotiations, abated this appeal until November 2003. Appellants Dalisa, Inc.
and Enchanted Rock Pictures, L.P. have now filed a motion to dismiss, stating the parties have settled their dispute. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: August 14, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, (the Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/    CAROLE R.
WRIGHTName:

Carole R. WrightDate:

March 22, 2010
EPA Registration Jacket 432-1478 

Vol.1 
1
2

*Page 2 is not included in this copy, Internal Deliberative Information*
3
4
5

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
6

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

*Commercial/financial information may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
29
*Pages 30 through 31 contain the product confidential statement of formula and are not included in this copy*
32

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
47

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-KSB of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.for the year ended December 31, 2007, I, Richard J. Morgan, President andChief Executive Officer of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc., hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) suchForm 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2) theinformation contained in such, fairly presents such Form 10-KSB for theyear ended December 31, 2007, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|  /s/ Richard J. Morgan            |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard J. Morgan                      |
| President and Chief Executive  Officer |
| March 6, 2008                     |

 

----