alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

# RECEIVED OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, D.C. 

### MAR 26 20!4**--------------~~--~~--~~~--~-------------** Inthe Matter ofMountainAir Cargo, Inc. 

### HEARING DOCKET 2013EA680043 Judge Not Assigned

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States Department ofTransportation, Office ofHearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.204(b), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully requested to be forwarded as follows:: Zachary M. Berman Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 Telephone: 718 553-3258 Facsimile: 718 995-5699 Respectfully submitted, Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. Regional Counsel

By: Dated: 

# ""f{(l/{{ -----f, --'---1-,'---!-.
-- Zachary AttorneyCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certifY that on this day copies ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance were placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail

- Return Receipt Requested addressed as follows: MarkA. Dombroff, Esq. McKenna Long & Aldridge 1676 International Drive Penthouse McLean, VA 22102

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding- Room 2014**~IF** FILING BYFEDERAL EXPRESS Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430**Date:~------** LisiH' oks J Paralegal Specialist Office ofRegional Counsel I Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bryan Miller, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sunergy, Inc. for the period
          ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Sunergy, Inc.

Dated: June 29, 2011
                                              /s/ Bryan Miller
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Bryan Miller
                                              President and Director
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
                                              Sunergy, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Sunergy, Inc. and will be retained
by Sunergy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit31(a)**

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard J. Morgan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSBof CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small businessissuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the smallbusiness issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: March 12, 2007 |   | /s/ Richard  J. Morgan                |   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Richard J. Morgan                     |
|                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### John Gottlieb, Respondent, *v.*The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

Reargument ordered. Dykman, J., not sitting.
March 20, 2001




 

 

March 20, 2001


Mr. R. Dirk Stinson

President

818879 Alberta, Ltd.


Dear Dirk:

This letter is intended to document our prior agreement relative to the amendment of certain dates contained in our PBC technology license dated March 5, 1999 with 818879 Alberta, Ltd. relating to the listing of our common stock on a "national
market".  Specifically, for valuable consideration given to 818879 Alberta, Ltd. including our obligation to pay you the sum of U.S. $1, we agreed that effective December 31, 2000, the references to "March 4, 2002" contained in sections 9.2 and 10.1
of the PBC technology license will be changed to "March 5, 2004", and the reference to "March 4, 2003" contained in section 9.2(3) of the PBC technology license will be changed to "March 5, 2005".

If the foregoing accurately reflects your understanding please countersign this letter where indicated below and return it to Clean Energy at your earliest convenience.

Very truly yours,

/s/  John P. Thuot

John P. Thuot, President

Agreed to and accepted:

818879 Alberta, Ltd.

/s/  R. Dirk Stinson

R. Dirk Stinson, President

Date: March 23, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-16-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         662,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               662,110
<PP&E>                                          82,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 743,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,178
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,229
<OTHER-SE>                                     696,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   743,782
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,098
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,583,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,594,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,594,684)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)



</TABLE>
No. 44100.

#### Protest 780730-G of Leigh Textile Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

The protest was dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14783-14784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5704]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-358-000]


CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

March 22, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 20, 2007, CenterPoint Energy Gas 
Transmission Company (CEGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets 
to be effective May 1, 2007:

Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 17
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 18
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 19
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 31
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 32

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in

[[Page 14784]]

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing an 
intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e787b6c7d71505257505b6d4b4e4e514c4a7e585b4c5d10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4f2f1e6f7fbdad8dddad1e7c1c4c4dbc6c0f4d2d1c6d79ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5704 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 57382.

protest 176052-K (San Francisco).

#### T. C. Hughes Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The *per se*value of the merchandise, as shown on the invoice, was converted on the informal entry to $55, and the» evidence disclosed that plaintiff had actually paid $45. The customs inspector testified that he did not recall discussing the value with the importer at the time of entry. The official papers disclosed that, at the time .the entry was prepared in the presence of the plaintiff, no complaint was made (section 16.12, Customs Regulations of 1943, as amended). The court held that the record was devoid of proof of the value of the merchandise under section 401, Tariff Act of 1930. The protest was therefore dismissed.
No. 42944.

#### Protests 848366-G/10908, etc., of Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Standard Oil Co.*v. *United States*(3 Cust. Ct. 39, C. D. 199) the protests were sustained.
#### Goosay, Appellant, *v.*Moffat Coal Company, Inc.

Argued January 21, 1969.

Before Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*556April 23, 1969:

*Joseph E. Gallagher,*with him *Garlón M. O’Malley, Sr., John W. Bour,*and *O’Malley, Morgan, Bour & Gallagher,*for appellant.

*William J. Oliver,*with him *Oliver, Price and Rhodes,*for appellees.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Bell took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### Moning v Alfono.

(Docket No. 55669.)

On order of the Court, it appearing that a question exists as to whether the cross-appeal of Joseph, Yvonne and Vincent Alfono was effectively decided by this Court’s opinion and judgment order, both dated June 15, 1976, this supplemental order is issued.

It is hereby ordered that the part of the judgment of the Circuit Court for the County of Wayne, dated April 25, 1972, which determined there was no cause of action on the part of any cross-plaintiff against cross-defendants Joseph, Yvonne and Vincent Alfono is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court for the County of Wayne for a new trial in conformity with the opinion filed herein, for the following reason.

It is clear upon the record, trial transcript pages 11-13, vol III, that there was an agreement and understanding among all of the attorneys for the parties to this cause and the trial judge that the trial court would issued one judgment order of no cause of action against the plaintiffs and against each and every defendant and cross-plaintiff. One explicitly stated purpose of this understanding and agreement was to avoid the result that any cross-claim could be, after and on account of appellate court action, in any different status than the other cross claims. This Court’s judgment order, *inter alia,*reversed and thus set aside the trial court judgment of no cause of action against "each and every defendant and cross-plaintiff.” On cross-appeal the Alfonos would have this Court, in effect, affirm the part of the trial court judgment which ordered that there was no cause of action,against the Alfonos, leaving them protected against potential liability as cross-defendants on the new trial of this cause while other cross-defendants remain exposed to such liability. For the reason stated that relief is denied.

Reported at 400 Mich 425.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8424 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8424

  To require the release to the public of all documents, reports, and 
  other records relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2024

Mr. Burchett (for himself, Mr. Moskowitz, Mrs. Luna, and Mr. Burlison) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the release to the public of all documents, reports, and 
  other records relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``UAP Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO 
              UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 270 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the President shall direct the head of each 
Federal department or agency in possession of documents, reports, or 
other records relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena to 
declassify and make available on a publicly available website of each 
such department or agency all such documents, reports, or other 
records.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 360 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act and quarterly thereafter, the President shall 
transmit to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report detailing the progress 
toward implementing subsection (a) made by each Federal department and 
agency.
    (c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``unidentified anomalous 
phenomena'' has the meaning given such term in section 1683 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (50 U.S.C. 
3373).
                                 <all>
```
Before the Second Division,

July 23, 1943

No. 48583.

#### Protests 20870-K, etc., of E. W. C. Toepfer (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was conclusively established that the wrenches .are similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Ritter Carlton Co.*(30 C. C. P. A. 208, C. A. D. 234), the record in which ease was incorporated herein. Following that decision they were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 396 as claimed.
#### Sarah C. Chambers, *Respondent, v.*John S. Jones, Appellant.

J udgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Bockes, J.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8438 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit qualified distributions 

from section 529 plans for certain transportation and parking expenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2024 

Ms. MCCLELLAN (for herself and Ms. SA ́NCHEZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

qualified distributions from section 529 plans for certain 

transportation and parking expenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. QUALIFIED DISTRIBUTIONS FROM SECTION 529 

4 PLANS FOR CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION AND 

5 PARKING EXPENSES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529(e)(3)(A) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ 

8 at the end of clause (ii), by striking the period at the end 

9 of clause (iii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by inserting after 

10 clause (iii) the following new clause: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8438 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) reasonable expenses for trans2 portation (including parking) to such eligi3 ble educational institution, not in excess of 

4 the allowance (applicable to the student) 

5 for transportation included in the cost of 

6 attendance (as defined in section 472 of 

7 the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

8 U.S.C. 1087ll), as in effect on the date of 

9 the enactment of this clause) as deter10 mined by such eligible educational institu11 tion.’’. 

12 (b) APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS.—Section 529(c)(8) 

13 of such Code is amended by inserting ‘‘and to reasonable 

14 expenses for transportation (including parking) in connec15 tion with such participation’’ before the period at the end. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to distributions made after the 

18 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in:

     (i) Registration Statement No. 333-41074 on Form S-8 pertaining to
         the Plastics Mfg. Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and

    (ii) Registration Statement No. 333-45830 on Form S-8 pertaining to
         the Plastics Mfg. Company Restricted Stock Plan of our report,
         dated November 22, 2000, on our audit of the consolidated
         financial statements of Plastics Mfg. Company as of September
         30, 2000, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


 Milwaukee, Wisconsin              WIPFLI ULLRICH BERTELSON LLP
 December 28, 2000
                                 -51-