alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(LOGO) Deloitte & Touche


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 1200
695 Town Center Drive
Costa Mesa, California 92626-1924
Telephone: (714) 436-71O0
Facsimile: (714) 436-7200



INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT




To Ameriquest Mortgage Company:

We have examined  management's  assertion about  Ameriquest  Mortgage  Company's
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended  December 31. 1999,  included in the
accompanying  management  assertion.  Management is  responsible  for Ameriquest
Mortgage  Company's  compliance  with those  minimum  servicing  standards.  Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion  on  management's  assertion  about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a  test  basis,  evidence  about  Ameriquest  Mortgage  Company's
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not provide a legal  determination on Ameriquest  Mortgage Company's  compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Ameriquest Mortgage Company complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1999, is fairly stated, in all material respects.


Deloitte & Touche LLP


February 25,2000


(LOGO) Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Ciavardini, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 506]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered May 27, 1994, convicting him of driving while intoxicated, aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree, and violations of Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 306, 375, 1102, and 1229-c (3), after a non-jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that certain comments made by the trial court during defense counsel’s summation indicated its bias, thus constituting reversible error *(see, People v Broom,*200 AD2d 515, 516; *People v Rivera,*176 AD2d 449, 450; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245, 250; *People v Palmer,*143 AD2d 469, 470). In any event, this contention is without merit. The trial court’s *653professional familiarity with and respect for a witness and the court’s comment as to his expertise were not inherently prejudicial to the defendant (see, *People v Zavaro,*138 AD2d 430; see *also generally, People v Moreno,*70 NY2d 403; *People v Dazi,*195 AD2d 571; *People v Jones,*143 AD2d 465). Also, under the circumstances of this case and in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, any error by the court by its comments was harmless *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
# Linda Icenhauer

- Ramirez 1103 Nueces, Austin, T exas 78701 Phone: 512

- 477

- 7991 Fax: 512

- 477

- 3580 E

- Mail: ljir@aol.com 

## Attorney and Counselor at Law

April 22 , 2015

Mr. Jeffrey Kyle, Clerk Third Court of Appeals of Texas P.O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711

Re: State of Texas v. Daniel Lopez Cardoza Appeal of Cause No. D

- 1

- DC

- 12

- 201877, 331st District Court of Travis County, Texas Third Court o f Appeals Cause No: 03

- 13

- 00269

- CR

Dear Mr. Kyle :

In accordance with Tex.R.App.Proc. 48.4, please be ad vised that I have sen t Mr. Lopez Cardoza a copy of the opinion in his case as well as a letter informing him of his right to file a petition for discretionary review. I am attaching a copy of the return receipt for this mailing. If you have any questions, please contact me.

. Sincerely,

Linda Icenhauer

- Ramirez

Enclosure

cc: Ms. Lisa Stewart, Asst. Dist. Attorney Travis County District Attorney ’s Office P.O. Box 1748 Austin, Texas 78767 ACCEPTED 03-13-00269-CR 4995668 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/22/2015 4:56:31 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKiNDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION

Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits.

. Article Addressed to: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY

A. Sign re Agent

.44 (3 Addressee

B. jie l Felved by ( Ird

i r a yig s m) C, gal 9tpallyery 

### )11a4/1

- e-i /

D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No X

ce\ \1`-‘5 a C rn R-"\-`8

\-,

` 41 , 3. Service_Type
0 Certified Mall
❑ Registered
❑ Insured Mall 0 Express Mall

0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes

2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7012 1640 0002 1049 0748

PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595

- 02

- M

- 15
EXHIBIT 4.15

                                    SCHEDULE

                   Information on six substantially identical
                       Environmental Indemnity Agreements
                           dated as of March 23, 2001
                    by Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc.
                          and Co-Indemnitor Named Below
                      in favor of First Union National Bank


       (Six additional documents are identical, except as set forth below,
                    to the document included as Exhibit 4.7)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                           Principal
Apartment Property                              Co-Indemnitor                                         Amount of Loan
------------------                              -------------                                         --------------
<S>                                             <C>                                                        <C>
Harbour Club Apartments                         CRIT-VA II, Inc.                                           8,475,000
Virginia Beach, Virginia

Highland Hills Apartments                       CRIT-NC III, LLC                                          14,775,000
Carrboro, North Carolina

Canyon Hills                                    CAC II Limited Partnership                                12,675,000
Austin, Texas

Park Village                                    CAC II Limited Partnership                                 8,500,000
Bedford, Texas

Summertree                                      CAC II Limited Partnership                                 7,750,000
Dallas, Texas

The Courts on Pear Ridge                        CAC II Limited Partnership                                10,575,000
Dallas, Texas
</TABLE>
| D**AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS**Maxwell AFB, Alabamavoice: (334) 953-6281;                 DSN Prefix 493                                fax: (334) 953-6862
**Air Unversity Press Points of Contact:**    - Deputy Director (334) 953-6281        

- Customer Service Desk (334) 953-2773/6136        

- Book sales  (334) 953-6281        

- FAX (334) 953-6862        

- DSN  prefix is 493-        

- Web page editor (334) 953-6452        

Our mailing address is        

AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS (AUL/LP)                        131 W SHUMACHER AVE                        MAXWELL AFB AL 36112-6615

AU Press Home

      |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| *Current as of:*17 July 2003      

 Feedback? E-mail your comments or suggestions to Air      University Press

Contents of this Web site reviewed      and approved by AU/PAThis page maintained AU Press Web page      editor  (334) 953-6452  DSN 493-6452.      Report problems or send  comments about this page  to: Web editor, Air University      Press.

  This Air Force Web site is compliant with      Section 508 standards. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
ex_1034.htm


Exhibit 10.34







AMENDMENT No. 11 TO PROMISSORY NOTE







This Amendment No. 11 to the Promissory Note, originally dated September 1, 2010 (the “Note”), previously amended February 11, 2011, May 31, 2011, July 29, 2011, November 7, 2011, March 27, 2012, July 31, 2012, November 1, 2012, January 9, 2013, May 8, 2013, and March 21, 2014 (the “Amendments”), is entered into as of the 17th day of March, 2015, by and between CMS Acquisition, LLC (“CMS”) and CleanTech Biofuels, Inc. (“CTB”), collectively the “Parties.”







WHEREAS, the Note is secured by the CTB owned U.S. Patent No. 6,306,248 pursuant to a Security Agreement dated as of September 1, 2010, between CMS and CTB (the “Security Agreement”);







WHEREAS, a payment of $25,000 was made on February 11, 2011 for interest to date and principal, by CTB on the Note;







WHEREAS, as of May 16, 2011, the rate to accrue interest increased to 10.0% per annum (from 9.0% per annum);







 WHEREAS, as of November 7, 2011, Warrant (A1) issued with the original Note on September 1, 2010 was re-dated to November 7, 2011;







WHEREAS, as of May 8, 2013, CTB issued an additional warrant (A2) for 150,000 shares of CTB’s common stock, par value $0.001 (“common stock”), with an exercise price of $0.05 and an expiration date of May 8, 2018, and re-dated the original warrant (A1) to May 8, 2013; and







WHEREAS, as of March 21, 2014, CTB issued an additional warrant (A3) for 150,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.05 and an expiration date of March 21, 2019, and re-dated the original warrant (A1) and an additional warrant (A2) to March 21, 2014; and







WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the terms of the Note as set forth below.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:


 


 



	
1.  

	
The Maturity Date, as defined in the Amendments, shall be changed to September 17, 2016 from March 1, 2015.







 



	
2.  

	
All previously issued warrants, the original warrant (A1) and both additional warrants (A2 and A3), are re-dated to March 17, 2015.







 



	
3.  

	
An additional Warrant (A4) will be issued as of March 17, 2015 for 150,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.10 and an expiration date of March 17, 2020.







 



	
4.  

	
CMS assigning the Note to the WL Meyer Legacy Trust (with any additional assignments requiring consent by CTB).







 



	
5.  

	
All remaining terms and conditions of the Note, Security Agreement and Warrants A1, A2, and A3 shall continue in full force and effect.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CTB and CMS have caused this Amendment No. 11 to the Note to be executed and delivered by their duly authorized officers as of the day and year set forth above.


 




	 	 
CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.:

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ 	 
	 	 	Name:  Edward P. Hennessey	 
	 	 	Title:  CEO	 



 




	 	 
CMS Acquisition, LLC:

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ 	 
	 	 	Name 	 
	 	 	Title
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Balanced Series.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                               
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                             
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund
Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund



|                                                                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                 
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                  
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                      
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund

Date: May 8, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP07-120-001] 

Take notice that on January 8, 2007, Stingray Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (Stingray) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 2, to become effective January 21, 2007. 

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to                           ( print page 2276)                        the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

Magalie R. Salas, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-574 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 3, 2021

Order 

Clerk

September 3, 2021

161581(18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 161581

v COA: 353317

Genesee CC: 1998-003320-FC

OCTAVIANO E. MOLINA JR., Defendant-Appellant. 

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the second motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the 

time for filing its answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer 

submitted on September 1, 2021, is accepted as timely filed.
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.                    | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB for the period ending January 31,                2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                             |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| 2.                    | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB for                the period ending January 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                Travel Hunt Holdings, Inc. |

| Dated:                March 14, 2007 |
|--------------------------------------|

**TRAVEL      HUNT HOLDINGS, INC.**

| By: | */s/                Nancy Reynolds* |
|-----|-------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6744
RICHARD LEE HAYWOOD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DONALD GUILLORY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1161) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Lee Haywood, Appellant. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. In his petition, Appellant raised the following claims: (1) his attempted murder and malicious wounding convictions violate the Double Jeopardy Clause; (2) his indictments were defective; (3) his arraignment was improperly conducted; and (4) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for breaking and entering, first degree murder, and abduction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error as to the dismissal of claims (1) and (2). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss these claims on the reasoning of the district court. Haywood v. Guillory , No. CA-95-1161 (E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 1996). Upon further review, we find claim (3) and all but the breaking and entering count in claim (4) to be non-exhausted and procedurally defaulted under the rule in Slayton v. Parrigan, 205 S.E.2d 680 (Va. 1974), cert. denied , 419 U.S. 1108 (1975). Turning then to the only remaining claim, we find that, taking the evidence adduced at trial and its logical inferences in the light most favorable to the Government, a reasonable fact-finder could have found Appellant guilty of violating Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-92 (Michie1995 Supp.) beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-3 ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED