alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8286 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8286

 To prohibit Federal funding for National Public Radio and to provide 
  for the transfer of certain Federal funds that would have been made 
 available to National Public Radio to reduce the public debt, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2024

  Ms. Tenney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit Federal funding for National Public Radio and to provide 
  for the transfer of certain Federal funds that would have been made 
 available to National Public Radio to reduce the public debt, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defund NPR Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING FOR NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO.

    (a) In General.--After the date of the enactment of this Act, no 
Federal funds may, directly or indirectly, be made available to or used 
to support an organization described in subsection (b), including 
through the payment of dues to or the purchase of programming from such 
organization by a public broadcast station using Federal funds received 
by such station.
    (b) Organizations Described.--The organizations described in this 
subsection are--
            (1) the organization known, as of the date of the enactment 
        of this Act, as ``National Public Radio''; and
            (2) any successor organization to an organization described 
        in paragraph (1).
    (c) Transfer of Certain Funds To Reduce the Public Debt.--For 
fiscal years 2024, 2025, and 2026, the Corporation for Public 
Broadcasting shall transfer to the account established by section 
3113(d) of title 31, United States Code, an amount equal to the amount 
allocated under section 396(k)(3)(A)(iii) of the Communications Act of 
1934 (47 U.S.C. 396(k)(3)(A)(iii)) that would have been made available 
to an organization described in subsection (b) but for the prohibition 
in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT      21**

**SUBSIDIARIES**

| **Legal                Name**                                 |   | **Jurisdiction                of Incorporation** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |   |                                             |
| NDS                Limited                                    |   | Great                Britain                     |
| News                Datacom Limited                           |   | Great                Britain                     |
| NDS                Technologies Israel Limited                |   | Israel                                           |
| NDS                Americas, Inc.                             |   | Delaware                                         |
| NDS                Asia Pacific Limited                       |   | Hong                Kong                         |
| Orbis                Technology Limited                       |   | Great                Britain                     |
| NT                Media Limited                               |   | Great                Britain                     |
| Digi-Media                Vision Limited                      |   | Great                Britain                     |
| NDS                Asia Pacific Pty Limited                   |   | Australia                                        |
| NDS                Marketing Israel Limited                   |   | Israel                                           |
| NDS                Beijing Information Technology Company     |   | China                                            |
| NDS                Denmark A/S                                |   | Denmark                                          |
| Interactive                Television Entertainment ApS       |   | Denmark                                          |
| NDS                Technologies France SAS                    |   | France                                           |
| NDS                Services Pay-TV Technology Private Limited |   | India                                            |
| NDS                Holdings BV                                |   | Netherlands                                      |
| NDS                Sweden AB                                  |   | Sweden                                           |
| Jungo                Limited                                  |   | Israel                                           |
| Jungo                Software, Inc.                           |   | Delaware                                         |

----
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

34) IV-E-22 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 9:15:28 AM Sheet 34 of 105 
P.2 

RADIAN 

CORPORATIO N 

A-83-27 

IV-E-22 

TELEPHONE CALL REPORT 

DATE: October 23, 1986 

TO: Mr. Dennis Ramsey 

Department of Environmental Management 

P. 0. Box 27687 

Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 

(919) 733-5083 

FROM: Phillip A. May, Radian Corporation 

SUBJECT: Sodium Scrubber Discharge Considerations 

^r:%^',,ir 

J*r rJ0 

Mr. Ramsey stated that all discharges, whether they are/from a scrubber 

unit itself or from a publicafly owned treatment works, musvmeet the states-^fise-HAac-* 

_ tlF- AvAn,46<-<-, Pus ,rfr* u*r« c?».AL,ry \c< t HCfi <4y 

ulTlueiil yulilel ine-j. An effluent guide!ine^^rji concentration limit used in c ^ / ^

v — -

permitting a new source. The impact of a new source is evaluated by 

determining pollutant concentrations in the receiving water body if the 

AIL01^4 gl *-. /*>STrl * 4/r* 

discharge were to occur. The'concentration limits are called water quality 

criteria. The criteria in North Carolina for sulfate and TDS is 250 „ A 

mg/liter for discharge into a receiving water body which w411 potentially bo -

-u$«4 as a drinking water source. He also stated that he would send a copy 

of the NC water quality criteria. 

i^0~t^W 

*~^<^c±{ y^^y- jiL 

^L^^r^^y^' 

Progress Center/3200 E. Chapel Hill Rd./Nelson Hwy./P.O. Box 13000/Research Triangle Park. N.C. 27709/(919)541-9100
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John R. Bailey, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Global Energy Group, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: June 9, 2005 /s/ John R. BaileyJohn R. BaileyInterim Chief Executive Officer, 
President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Summit Financial Services Group, Inc. (the Company), for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marshall T. Leeds, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Marshall T. Leeds                                       
|Marshall T. Leeds                                           
|Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President



Dated: May 16, 2005
#### ALITA E. HOUGH, RESPONDENT, v. HELLER BROTHERS COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Submitted December 9, 1918

Decided March 3, 1919.

An employe of defendant, in loading a truck in the course of his employment, lifted the tailboard to permit the plaintiff, a traveler on the sidewalk, to pass; the jury might have found that it then fell without fault of the plaintiff and injured her. *Held,*that the question of defendant’s liability was for the jury.

On appeal from the Essex County Circuit Court.

For the respondent, *W. Howard Demarest.*

For the appellant, *Kellogg & Chance.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

The plaintiff was injured while traveling along the sidewalk by the defendant’s factory. A truck of a transportation company was at- the time backed up and in process of loading. One O’Neill, an employe of Heller Brothers Company, was assisting at this work. The tailboard of the truck was down, projected over the sidewalk, and obstructed passage of the plaintiff. O’Neill lifted it to permit plaintiff to pass. The jury might have found that it then fell without fault of the plaintiff and caused the injuries for which she sues.

The only grounds of appeal are the refusal to nonsuit and to direct a verdict for defendants. The basis of defendant’s appeal is that O’Neill was not at the time engaged in the defendant’s • business. It is said that raising the tailboard of the truck was no part of his duties. To us it seems that it was incidental to his work of assisting in loading the truck; it was done to prevent this work from interfering with the rights of the public to pass on the sidewalk. Even if done merely out of politeness, the act was none the less *553clone in furtherance of the work. We cannot assume that the defendant meant that the ordinary acts of courtesy should not he performed on its behalf, where the need arose from the transaction of its business.

Let the judgment be affirmed, with costs.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 14.

*For reversal*— None.
Exhibit 32.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell/Graham Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                  
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                   
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                       
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: May 14, 2008
No. 60911.

#### Antonio Pompeo *v.*United States,

protest 287549-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of superchargers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Antonio Pompeo*(43 C. C. P. A. 9, C. A. D. 602), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Ambrose S. Cassidy, *Respondent, v.*Robert Jenkins, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Macomber, J. '
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8591 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to add requirements to the annual report 

of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 31, 2024 

Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to add requirements 

to the annual report of the Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Reserve Fi5 nancial Accountability and Transparency Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8591 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO 

2 THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF 

3 GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYS4 TEM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The 7th undesignated paragraph 

6 of section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 247) 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘The Board’’ and inserting the 

9 following: 

10 ‘‘(7) ANNUAL REPORT.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Board’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(B) REPORT REQUIREMENTS.—The re14 port required under subparagraph (A) shall in15 clude the following: 

16 ‘‘(i) Annual expenditures and full-time 

17 equivalent employees for each Federal re18 serve bank with respect to each of the fol19 lowing categories: 

20 ‘‘(I) Supervision activities of fi21 nancial institutions. 

22 ‘‘(II) Legal functions. 

23 ‘‘(III) Operations of the Federal 

24 reserve bank, including currency serv25 ices, automated clearing house servVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:53 Jul 17, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8591.IH H8591

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8591 IH

1 ices, check clearing services, and 

2 wholesale payment services. 

3 ‘‘(IV) Financial stability and 

4 open market operations. 

5 ‘‘(V) Administrative functions, 

6 including human resources, account7 ing, and information technology. 

8 ‘‘(VI) Economic research. 

9 ‘‘(VII) Any engagement with 

10 international cooperative bodies, in11 cluding the Bank for International 

12 Settlements, the Basel Committee on 

13 Banking Supervision, and the Net14 work for Greening the Financial Sys15 tem. 

16 ‘‘(ii) The 3 most important areas of 

17 research, as measured by annual expendi18 tures and full-time equivalent employees, 

19 for the Board of Governors of the Federal 

20 Reserve System and for each Federal re21 serve bank. 

22 ‘‘(iii) The annual expenditures in the 

23 previous year dedicated to each rule, guid24 ance, and policy statement that was pro25 posed or finalized.’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 8591 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this Act shall take effect on the date that is 2 years after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Ovington’s Gift Shop, Inc. *v.*United States.

No. 6315.

Entry No. 710279, etc.

Invoices dated Liverpool, England, October 1, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 7, 1942, etc.

(Decided July 29, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the Plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise consisting of earthenware and chinaware and the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues decided in *United States*v. *Wm.*
>       *279
>       *S. Pitcairn Corp.,*Suit No. 4513, C. A. D. 334, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the appraised value of the merchandise consisting of earthenware and chinaware involved in each of the cases enumerated in the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country, from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as tbat value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe valué of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and tbat such values are tbe appraised values, less tbe additions made by tbe importer on entry because of advances by tbe appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as tbe appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14647-14648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5607]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, 
Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 6 committee of the Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel (TAP) is soliciting public comments, ideas, and 
suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service. The TAP will use citizen input to make recommendations to the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, April 26, 2007.

[[Page 14648]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227, or 
206-220-6096.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, April 26, 2007 from 1 p.m. Pacific Time to 2:30 p.m. Pacific 
Time via a telephone conference call. The public is invited to make 
oral comments. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you 
would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-
888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Dave Coffman, TAP Office, 915 
2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. Due to limited conference lines, notification of 
intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be 
made with Dave Coffman. Mr. Coffman can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6096.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 20, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E7-5607 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P