alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(V. D. 90)

#### Schneider Bros. & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. WHB 77999.

(Decided November 10, 1958)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *Schneider Bros. & Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*39 Cust. Ct. 515, Abstract 61388, and it has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, relative to the merchandise covered by the remand of the Court under *Schneider Bros. & Co. v. United States*reported in Abstract 61388, decided December 5, 1957:

> 1. That the merchandise consists of microscopes in wooden boxes exported from Japan.

> *4682. That on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for exportation to the United States in the principal market of Japan in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, packed ready for shipment to the United States at the prices stated in United States currency in Column “A” of the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That on or about the date of exportation such or similar wooden cases of said microscopes were freely offered for sale for exportation to the United States in the principal market of Japan in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, packed ready for shipment to the United States at the prices stated in United States currency in Column “B” of the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 4. That on or about the date of exportation said microscopes and wooden cases were freely offered for sale for home consumption in Japan at no higher prices.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and I hold such dutiable value for each of the articles to be as set forth in columns “A” and “B” of the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated November 28, 2006, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on December 7, 2006, (71 FR 70985), Cayman Chemical Company, 1180 East Ellsworth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule I: Drug
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I
 
 
 The company plans to manufacture small quantities of marihuana derivatives for research purposes. In reference to drug code 7360 (Marihuana), the company plans to bulk manufacture cannabidiol. In reference to drug code 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols), the company will manufacture a synthetic THC. No other activity for this drug code is authorized for this registration. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Cayman Chemical Company to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Cayman Chemical Company to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: March 8, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E7-5386 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0425

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM180AD

A330-32-3233, R01 ---7/5/13

MESSIER-DOWTY D23581-32-061 --- 11/2/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v PETER ZULLO, Personnelman Seaman, U. S. Navy, Appellant

16 USCMA 249, 36 CMR 405

No. 19,324

April 29, 1966

*Fred W. Shields, Esquire,*and *Captain L. G. Bohlen,*USMC, were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel J. E. Hanthorn,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

We granted review in this case on the same issue of .jurisdiction that was pending in United States v Surtasky, 16 USCMA 241, 36 CMR 397. For the reasons set out in our opinion in *Surtasky,*we affirm the decision of the board of review.

Judges Ferguson and Kilday concur.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                 TO THE BYLAWS
                                       OF
                              GENIUS PRODUCTS, INC.


         By resolution of the Board of Directors dated April 20, 2000, pursuant
to Article XIII of the Company's Bylaws, Section 1 of Article II of the Bylaws
is hereby amended and restated by substituting therefor the following
provision:

         SECTION 1. ANNUAL MEETINGS. The annual meeting of the shareholders
         shall be held at the registered office of the corporation, or at such
         other place as may be specified or fixed in the notice of such meeting
         at a time that may be determined by the directors in accordance with
         the laws of the State of Nevada.

         The amendment to the Company's Bylaws set forth in the resolution dated
April 20, 2000 was approved by a majority of the Company's Board of Directors
and was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of the General
Corporation Law of Nevada.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been adopted as of this 20th day
of April, 2000.


                                          /S/ Dorian Lowell
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Dorian Lowell, President and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8446 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8446

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Energy Act of 2020 to include critical materials in the 
        definition of critical mineral, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Critical Mineral Consistency Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. CRITICAL MATERIALS INCLUDED AS CRITICAL MINERALS.

    Section 7002 of the Energy Act of 2020 (30 U.S.C. 1606) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3)(A), to read as follows:
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `critical mineral' 
                means--
                            ``(i) any mineral, element, substance, or 
                        material designated as critical by the 
                        Secretary under subsection (c); and
                            ``(ii) a critical material as determined by 
                        the Secretary of Energy under paragraph 
                        (2)(A).''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(5), by adding at the end the 
        following:
                    ``(C) Inclusion of critical materials.--Not later 
                than 45 days after the date on which the Secretary of 
                Energy determines a non-fuel mineral, element, 
                substance, or material to be a critical material under 
                subsection (a)(2)(A), the Secretary shall update the 
                list of critical minerals published under paragraph (3) 
                to include such critical material.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 8446

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Energy Act of 2020 to include critical materials in the 
        definition of critical mineral, and for other purposes.
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

                   ------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of PARK HILL CAPITAL I CORPORATION (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Francis
Mailhot , Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 28, 2005


                                        /s/ Francis Mailhot
                                        -------------------
                                        Francis Mailhot
                                        Principal Accounting Officer
#### In re JOHN F. TOMMINS, Private, LAWRENCE J. CASTRO, Specialist Five, WILLIAM T. BELOW, Specialist Four, LEE D. SEYMOUR, Specialist Four, JOSEPH P. SMITH, Specialist Five, JOHN P. McCONNON, Specialist Four, ROBERT A. COLEMAN, Private, RICHARD L. COMPTON, Private, JAMES A. MACK, Specialist Four, McKENDRICK L. MAPP, Private, CECIL BALDWIN, Private First Class, MICHAEL D. OHLER, Private First Class, and RANDY S. PETERSON, Private, U. S. Army, Petitioners

Miscellaneous Docket No. 75-17

May 19, 1975

*Captain Brett L. Grayson,*counsel for Petitioners.

MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT

The above-named individuals have submitted for this Court’s consideration, a document entitled "Petition of Intervention.” By this means each seeks to intervene in the case of *Bouler v Wood,*Miscellaneous Docket No. 75-16 (USCMA, filed May 2, 1975), evidently as parties petitioner.

The petitioners represent that they are held in pretrial confinement, and they request the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the military judge named as respondent in *Bouler v Wood, supra,*to rule on motions for pretrial release "of all accused placed in pretrial confinement who appear before him with said motions,” or, in the alternative, to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the release of said petitioners.

Prescinding from the fact that class actions are not encompassed within the *411scope of 28 USC § 1651(a), nor otherwise authorized within the scope of this Court’s jurisdiction,1 to the extent that these petitioners assert individual claims for relief, their petition is ineffective for more fundamental reasons:

1.The charges under which each petitioner is confined pending trial are not set out. We cannot determine, therefore, whether or not their individual cases may eventually be the subject of a petition to this Court pursuant to Article 67(c)(3), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867(c)(3).2

2. There is no indication whether any of the charges have been referred to a court-martial authorized to impose a sentence within this Court’s jurisdictional limits.3

3. There is no indication that the charges against petitioners have been referred to a. court-martial to which the military judge named as respondent in *Bouler v Wood, supra,*has been detailed.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

1

*In re*Watson, 19 USCMA 401, 42 CMR 3 (1970).

2

 United States v Snyder, 18 USCMA 480, 40 CMR 192 (1969).

3

 United States v Snyder, *supra.*
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OBN Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)	The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated:  November 15, 2004       By: /s/ Roger Neal Smith
                                    --------------------
                                        Roger Neal Smith
                                        Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  November 15, 2004       By: /s/ Larry Taylor
                                    --------------------
                                        Larry Taylor
                                        Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IntelGenx Technologies
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Horst Zerbe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form
10-K/A solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K/A or as a separate
disclosure document.

|September 20, 2011 | By: | /s/Horst G. Zerbe                     | 
|------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------- | 
|                   |     | Horst G. Zerbe                        | 
|                   |     | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                   |     | (Principal Executive Officer)         | 

---
Power of Attorney

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each  individual  whose  signature  appears
below constitutes and appoints Henry Val and Israel Goldreich, and each of them,
his  true  and  lawful   attorneys-in-fact   and  agents   with  full  power  of
substitution,  for  him  and in his  name,  place  and  stead  in  any  and  all
capacities,  to sign this  Report on Form  10-KSB of  MaxPlanet  Corp.  for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2000 and any amendments  thereto,  and to file same,
with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection  therewith,  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  pursuant  to  Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities   Exchange   Act  of   1934,   as   amended,   granting   unto   said
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing  requisite  and necessary to be done to
comply with the provisions of the  Securities Act of 1934, and all  requirements
of the Securities and Exchange  Commission,  hereby ratifying and confirming all
that  said  attorneys-in-fact  and  agents  or  any of  them,  or  their  or his
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.


                                     HENRY VAL
                                     ------------------------------
                                     Henry Val

                                     ISAAK VAL
                                     ------------------------------
                                     Isaak Val

                                     ISRAEL GOLREICH
                                     ------------------------------
                                     Israel Goldreich
Exhibit 31.6**CERTIFICATION**I, Craig D. Abolt, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MSW Energy Holdings II LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 3, 2006         By:             /s/ Craig D. Abolt    Craig D. Abolt    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
50
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8483 

To amend the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations 

Act, 2024, to make a technical correction to the Federal payment made 

in such Act to the District of Columbia Public Defender Service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2024 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To amend the Financial Services and General Government 

Appropriations Act, 2024, to make a technical correction 

to the Federal payment made in such Act to the District 

of Columbia Public Defender Service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

5 Public Defender Service Technical Correction Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8483 IH

1 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION TO FEDERAL PAYMENT 

2 TO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC DE3 FENDER SERVICE. 

4 (a) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—The matter pre5 ceding the first proviso under the heading ‘‘FEDERAL PAY6 MENT TO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC DEFENDER

7 SERVICE’’ under the heading ‘‘FEDERAL FUNDS’’ in title 

8 IV of division B of the Further Consolidated Appropria9 tions Act, 2024 (Public Law 118–47; 138 Stat. 460) is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘, of which $3,000,000 shall remain 

11 available until September 30, 2026, for costs associated 

12 with relocation under a replacement lease for headquarters 

13 offices, field offices, and related facilities’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact16 ment of title IV of division B of the Further Consolidated 

17 Appropriations Act, 2024. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS