CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1 

(Electronic Format) 

I. GENERAL INFORMATION 

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District 

Rule No(s): 1110 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Rescinded January 15, 2013 

Rule Title(s): Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstration) 

Date Submitted to ARB: 09/23/2013 

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): N/A 

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No (If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Barbara Lods Phone Number: (661) 728-8070 x3 E-mail Address: blods@avaqmd.ca.gov 

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule 

Rule 1110-Emmissions From Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstration) was adopted by South 

Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on November 6, 1981 to set up a demonstration program to 

collect emission data for SCAQMD Rule 1110.1 - Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines. The 

SCAQMD demonstration program was completed on or about November 1991. This was prior to the formation of 

the Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District on 7/1/1997. Rule 1110 was subsequently rescinded by the 

SCAQMD on November 14, 1997. Due to the provisions of the implementing statute (former H&S Code §40106, 

A.B. 266-Knight Ch. 542, statutes of 1996) and the subsequent statutory creation of the Antelope Valley Air 

Quality Management District (H&S Code §41300 et seq.) the rule remained in the AVAQMD rule book though it 

was inapplicable due to the termination of the program and the fact that none of the program engines were 

located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD. The AVAQMD rescinded this rule due to its 

inapplicability 

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2 

 (CO) PM TAC (name): 

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS 

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) 

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined. 

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A 

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A 

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: N/A 

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible): 

N/A 
 

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2 

(Electronic Format) 

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A 

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A 

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A 

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A 

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and 

planning. 

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS 

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split 

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 0

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A% 

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A% 

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as 

necessary): N/A 

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY 

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No 

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) N/A of the Rule. 

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: N/A 

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS 

The Rule Contains: 

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Section(s): N/A 

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/A 
 

5/1/2002 

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3 

(Electronic Format) 

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN 

 No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment 

Discussion: This rule remained in the AVAQMD rule book though it was inapplicable due to the termination of the 

program and the fact that none of the program engines were located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD. 

The AVAQMD rescinded this rule due to its inapplicability, and there is no potential that the rescission might cause the 

release of additional air contaminants or create any adverse environmental impacts.