alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 00-20612

Summary Calendar

_______________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GENE LESSLEY PRICE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CR-313-2

_________________________________________________________________

September 19, 2001

Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

Counsel for Gene Lessley Price has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Price has received copies of counsel’s motion

and brief and has filed a response. Our independent review of the

brief, the response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. See id. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, Price’s motion for new counsel is DENIED,

and Price’s APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Before the Third Division,

December 27, 1938

No. 40238.

#### Petition 5613-R of Denver Equipment Co. (Denver).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the importer furnished the collector with all the information he had and made no attempt to defraud or conceal. On the record presented the petition was granted.
<PAGE>   1
                    ADDENDUM TO EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE NO. SG-0 1
                            DATED SEPTEMBER 22, 2000
               TO MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 22, 2000
                    BETWEEN NEOTHERAPEUTICS, INC., AS LESSEE
                  AND COMDISCO LABORATORY AND SCIENTIFIC GROUP
                     a DIVISION OF COMDISCO, INC., AS LESSOR

                       CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION

NeoTherapeutics, Inc. ("Lessee") certifies that it holds California Seller's
Permit Number ______________. With respect to the machinery and equipment leased
by Comdisco Laboratory and Scientific Group, a division of Comdisco, Inc.
("Lessor") to Lessee on the above referenced Equipment Schedule, Lessee claims
exemption from the payment of California sales or use taxes on the monthly lease
payments for the following reason:

The above referenced lease qualifies as an exempt acquisition sale and leaseback
transaction as defined under California Revenue and Taxation Code Section
6010.65(a) which states that:

        "`Sale' and `purchase' for the purpose of this part, do not include any
        transfer to title to, nor any lease of, tangible personal property
        pursuant to an acquisition sales and leaseback. An acquisition sale and
        leaseback is a sale by a person and leaseback to that person of tangible
        personal property where both of the following conditions are satisfied:

       (1)    That person has paid sales tax reimbursement or use tax with
              respect to that person's purchase of the property.

       (2)    The acquisition sale and leaseback is consummated within 90 days
             of that person's first functional use of the property."

Lessee certifies that it has paid sales tax reimbursement or use tax with
respect to its purchase of tangible property leased under the above referenced
equipment schedule, and agrees to provide evidence of such payment(s) to Lessor.

Based on Lessee's claim for exemption under Section 6010.65, Lessor agrees that
it will not invoice Lessee for use tax on the monthly rental rate.

NEOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.                  COMDISCO LABORATORY AND SCIENTIFIC GROUP,
as Lessee                              A DIVISION OF COMDISCO, INC.
                                       as Lessor

By:                                    By:
   ------------------------------          ----------------------------------

Title:                                 Title:
      ---------------------------             -------------------------------

Date:                                  Date:
      ---------------------------           ---------------------------------
Opinion filed December 8, 2016

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-16-00256-CV

___________

DASI REDDY DAYAKAR AND SATGURU HOSPITALITY, LLC,

Appellants

V.

CIVIC PLAZA, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 47,626-A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed in this court a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In 

the motion, the parties state that they have entered into an agreement to settle their 

disputes, and they request that we dismiss this appeal and order each party to bear 

its own costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

December 8, 2016 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
#### JOSEPH J. IMHOFF, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. JOSEPH J. IMHOFF AND JACK R. IMHOFF, SUBSTITUTED ADMINISTRATORS, C.T.A., *ETC.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS AND BARBARA G. IMHOFF, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

*Mr. John A. Yacovelle, Jr.,*and *Messrs. Piarulli & Vittori*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Thomas M. Farr*for the respondents.

April 30, 1968.

Denied.
No. 50543.

#### Protest 57601-K of Davis Collamore & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which'record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Contr ol

5600 Sand Lake Road Orlando, Florida 32819

- 8907



### Exemption Letter for § 91.151 : Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR conditions:

4/13/2015



### U.S. Department of Transportation, FAA Rule Making Office (ARM), Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 205 90

Mr

. Ryan

,

Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control (LMMFC ) is re

- applying for a special airworthiness

certificate “Experimental Category” for its unmanned aircraft system (UAS). LMMFC proposes to operate the UAS at its corporate owned test facility (ETS Test Site) near Orlando, Florida.

Presently, 14 CFR 91.151 States: (a) No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of in tended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed

— (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes. (b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless ( considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

Current configuration of the UAS does not permit extendin g fuel capability to meet the minimum requirement s of 14 CFR 91

- 151

. The UAS at Maximum Gross Weight carries ~ 10lbs fuel. Fuel capacity is between 1 1⁄2

- 2 1⁄2 US gallons depending on aircraft payload configuration. Fuel

burn rate is ~ 5 gal/hr. Therefore 2.5 gallons of fuel is ~ 00:30 min of f light time. LM test profiles

do not exceed 00:15 minute intervals

. R emainder fuel is reserved for landing and cool

- down of the turbine post landing. LMMFC is requ esting exemption from this rule 14 CFR 91.151; considering current configuration and operational limitations previously accepted by the FAA. This exemption poses no risk to general public safety.

Please contact me if you require additional information:

4/16/2015



# X Jacob A. Senior

Orlando Aviation Consultants

P.O. Box 621295, Orlando FL 32862

Signed by: Jacob Senior (affiliate)
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of ASAH Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zak W. Elgamal, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, fully complies with the |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ASAH Corp. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 
| Dated: November 14, 2005 |
|--------------------------|

 

**ASAH CORP.**

 

 
| By: | */s/ Zak W. Elgamal*Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       27829
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             27829
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               27829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          500
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      1395
<OTHER-SE>                                   25934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 27329
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              7671
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (7671)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  7671
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.009)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0






</TABLE>
#### JULIA KLEINMAN, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JANET WEXLER, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

*Messrs. Sutton, Ward, Sutton & Heim*and *Mr. Hdwin J. O’Malley, Jr.*for tbe petitioners.

*Messrs. Novins & Novins*for the respondents.

February 13, 1968.

Denied.
#### In the Matter of JULIUS BRAUN, an attorney at law.

March 20, 1967.

Reprimanded. Opinion reported at 49 *N. J.*16.
No. 59071.

protests 233756-K, etc. (New York).

#### S. E. Laszlo et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In acwrdance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5845]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,195]


Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc.; Kidde Residential and 
Commercial Division; Including On-Site Temporary Workers of Special 
Teams Power; Mebane, NC; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on October 12, 2006, applicable to workers of 
Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc., Kidde Residential and Commercial 
Division, Mebane, North Carolina. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on October 25, 2006 (71 FR 62490).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of portable fire extinguishers.
    New information shows that temporary workers of Special Teams Power 
were employed on-site at Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc., Kidde 
Residential and Commercial Division, Mebane, North Carolina.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include temporary workers of Special Teams Power 
working on-site at the Mebane, North Carolina location of the subject 
firm.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers employed at Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc., Kidde 
Residential and Commercial Division, Mebane, North Carolina who were 
adversely affected by a shift in production to Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,195 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc., Kidde 
Residential & Commercial Division, including on-site temporary 
workers of Special Team Power, Mebane, North Carolina, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 
1, 2005, through October 12, 2008, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 
and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment 
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-5845 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coast Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Brian P. Peters, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                               
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Brian P. Peters           
|                     |  |     |  | Brian P. Peters, President and
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RockwoodSpecialties Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Zatta, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 14, 2006                              |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/ ROBERT J. ZATTA                                |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                                    |
| Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
No. 54746.

#### McKesson & Robbins, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 158611-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that *292the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as “not landed, not found,” is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.
(Reap. Dec. 8579)

#### The Singer Manufacturing Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 793312.

(Decided May 11, 1956)

*Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The issue presented by this appeal for reap-praisement is the proper dutiable value of an importation of sewing-machine needles from Canada.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed that, on or about the date of exportation, such or *570similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Canada in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade either for home consumption or for export to the United States. It was further agreed that, on or about the date of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for domestic consumption in the principal market of the United States to all purchasers in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade. Also, it was stipulated by the parties that the costs of production for such merchandise were the unit invoice prices, plus an additional 8 per centum for profit, plus the costs of packing.

Upon the agreed facts, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the sewing-machine needles here involved, and that said cost of production is the unit invoice prices, plus an additional 8 per centum for profit, plus the costs of packing.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
YVES SAINTYL,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3402

Opinion filed August 19, 2014.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Yves Saintyl, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C).

ROBERTS, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Great Plains Energy Incorporated (1)

|Name of Company                   |  | State of Incorporation
|--------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Kansas City Power & Light Company |  | Missouri              
|KLT Inc.                          |  | Missouri              
|KLT Energy Services Inc.          |  | Missouri              
|Custom Energy Holdings, L.L.C.    |  | Delaware              
|Strategic Energy, L.L.C.          |  | Delaware              

(1)  Certain subsidiaries of Great Plains Energy Incorporated have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(21)(ii) of Regulation S-K. The indentation of the subsidiaries indicates ownership relationship to Great Plains Energy Incorporated.