alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Summit Financial
Services Group, Inc. (the "Company"), for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Marshall T. Leeds, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Marshall T. Leeds
------------------------------------
Marshall T. Leeds
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  May 14, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Summit Financial Services, Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Summit Financial Services Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
31 (1)
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14
  
 I, Angelo
De Caro, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Patriot National
Bancorp, Inc;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The small
business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  [Omitted
as permitted by Exchange Act Release No. 47986];
 
 (c)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
 
 5. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 
 
 (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.
 
 /s/
      Angelo De CaroAngelo
      De Caro,Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      executive officer)
 
 
 March 22,
2005
#### Rockledge Municipal Authority *v.*E. Leva & Sons, Inc. et al., Appellants.

Argued January 7,1969.

April 23, 1969:

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*Paul D. North,*with him *Duffy, North, Duffy & Wilson,*for appellants.

*Harry C. Barbin,*for appellee.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection

[CBP Dec. 07-12]


Re-Approval of the Strawn Group as a Commercial Gauger

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of re-approval The Strawn Group of Houston, Texas, as a 
commercial gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, The 
Strawn Group, 3855 Villa Ridge, Houston, Texas 77068, has been re-
approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals 
and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the 
provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity for 
gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the 
entity that it is approved by the Bureau of Customs and Border 
Protection to conduct the specific gauger service requested. 
Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific gauger services this 
entity is approved to perform may be directed to the Bureau of Customs 
and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also 
be sent to http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/org_and_operations.xml.

DATES: The re-approval of The Strawn Group as a commercial gauger 
became effective on January 4, 2005. The next triennial inspection date 
will be scheduled for January 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene J. Bondoc, PhD, or Randall 
Breaux, Laboratories and Scientific Services, Bureau of Customs and 
Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, 
Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: March 22, 2007.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
 [FR Doc. E7-5706 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
No. 47962.

#### Protests 556413-G, etc., of Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the harvest hats in question, valued at less than $3 per dozen, are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Caradine Hat Co.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), some of the harvest hats were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and others imported or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at only 12^ percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and the said trade agreement.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14525-14526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 032307A]


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting of the North Pacific Fishery 
Management Council's Halibut Charter Stakeholder Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Halibut 
Charter Stakeholder Committee will meet in Anchorage, AK at the North 
Pacific Research Board meeting room.

DATES: The meeting will be held on April 12, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m. and on April 13, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 12 noon.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the North Pacific Research 
Board, 1007 West 3rd Avenue, Suite 100 Anchorage, AK 99501.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane DiCosimo, Council staff; 
telephone: (907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda will include the following: 
report on status of Council actions; report on status of State actions; 
subcommittee report on finance mechanisms to compensate reallocation 
from commercial to charter sectors; continued revisions to permanent 
solution alternatives; separating allocation from permanent solution 
analysis; charter halibut bycatch mortality estimates; new proposals; 
other business.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at 
least 7 working days prior to the meeting date.


[[Page 14526]]


    Dated: March 23, 2007.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-5636 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
<PAGE>

                                                            EXHIBIT 10.10.13

February 27, 2001

Mr. P. Chrisman Iribe, Sr. Vice President
President & Chief Operating Officer
PG&E National Energy Group - East Region
7500 Old Georgetown Road, 13/th/ Flr.
Bethesda, MD  20814-6161

Dear Chris:

You are an essential member of our senior executive team and I view your
contribution as vital to getting the Corporation through its current challenges,
achieving the Corporation's objectives, and providing strong returns to
shareholders.

The Board of Directors recently approved a Senior Executive Retention program
which includes you. Under this program, you will receive a grant of phantom PG&E
Corporation restricted stock units granted under the PG&E Corporation Long-Term
Incentive Plan. The amount of your grant is $2,250,000 and it translates into
172,285 units calculated at the closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock
on February 21, 2001, of $13.06 per share. An extremely small number of
individuals are included in this arrangement. For this reason, it is absolutely
necessary for you to restrict any conversation on this subject to me, Brent
Stanley, or Tom Boren.

Your grant of phantom PG&E Corporation restricted stock units is effective
February 21, 2001, and will vest on December 31, 2004, subject to either one of
the following conditions:

  -  50 percent will automatically vest on December 31, 2004. The remaining 50
     percent will vest on December 31, 2004 only if the Corporation's
     performance, as measured by relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) on a
     cumulative basis over four years, is at or above the 55th percentile of its
     comparator group; or

  -  if, at the end of the third year of the grant, December 31, 2003, the
     Corporation's performance as measured by relative TSR on a cumulative
     basis, is at or above the 75th percentile of its comparator group, the
     entire grant will vest.

You may elect to defer your actual award payments under the PG&E Corporation
Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan prior to the award cliff-vesting. Such
deferrals will be made in PG&E Corporation phantom stock units on the first
business day of January of the year following vesting. Awards not deferred will
be paid in cash in January of the year following vesting.

If a monetizing event occurs (i.e., IPO or sale) which affects NEG, you will be
given the opportunity of exchanging your grant of phantom PG&E corporation stock
units under this program for an equity-type interest of comparable value in the
new entity.

Chris, I look forward to your continued strong contributions to PG&E
Corporation's success.

Sincerely,

ROBERT D. GLYNN, JR.
#### In the Matter of Reuben D. Pacis, Petitioner, v William K. Nelson, as Judge of the Rockland County Court, Respon*639dent.

[635 NYS2d 503]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, *inter alia,*to compel the Honorable William K. Nelson, Judge of the County Court, Rockland County, to issue a written decision denying the petitioner’s application for a pistol permit.

Motion by the respondent William K. Nelson to dismiss the proceeding.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motion, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

A written decision on the petitioner’s application for a pistol permit was rendered on September 13, 1995. Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE 

OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS 

• OF MARYLAND 

Petitioner 

• Misc gocket AG 

v. • No. 1-1 

• September Term, 2016 

WOO-MN KIM 

Respondent 

*********************************************** 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant 

to Maryland Rule 19-736 and Respondent's acknowledgement therein that sufficient evidence 

exists to sustain allegations that he committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 

1.15(a) and 8.4(b), (c) & (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct in effect at 

the time of the misconduct, it is this 16th day of sentember ,2016, 

ORDERED, that Woo-Jin Kim, Respondent, is hereby disbarred by consent from the 

practice of law in this State, effective immediately; and it is further 

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Woo-Jin Kim from the 

register of attorneys in this Court, notify Respondent of the filing of this order in accordance 

with Maryland Rule 19-742(a)(1), and comply with the notice provisions set forth in Maryland 

Rule 19-761(b). 

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. 

Senior Judge
#### Herman Veeder, *Respondent, v.*William Mudgett, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of referee.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Summit Financial Services Group, Inc. (the
Company), for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven C. Jacobs, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven C. Jacobs                                
|Steven C. Jacobs                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 15, 2006
Exhibit 4.3

[CyPost KK]



June 30, 2000


                               Letter of Agreement

                Cancellation of loan to CyPost Corporation, U.S.





Provided that CyPost Corporation, US sells CyPost KK to Access Media
International, I, Yoshisuke Ishiuchi, Director of CyPost KK agree to cancel all
of and every part of my loan(s) with CyPost Corporation, U.S. and any and all
claims against CyPost Corporation, U.S. without any further consideration or
future claims(s) whatsoever as of July 3, 2000 Japanese time.



/s/ Yoshisuki Ishiuchi                            /s/ Yoko Hiran
--------------------------------------            ------------------------------
Yoshisuke Ishiuchi                                witness



July 3, 2000               /s/ Tokyo Japan
-----------------------------------------------------
date / place




Bureau Toranomon 802, 2-7-16 Toranomon, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
Tel: 03-3502-0201


<PAGE>


[CyPost KK]



June 30, 2000


                               Letter of Agreement

                 Transfer of Shares to CyPost Corporation, U.S.





Provided that CyPost Corporation, US sells CyPost KK to Access Media
International, I, Yoshisuke Ishiuchi, a member of CyPost KK management, agree to
return forty-two (42) of my shares in CyPost KK, Stock to CyPost Corporation,
U.S. with no cost or liability to CyPost Corporation, U.S. and without any
further consideration or future claim(s) as of July 3, 2000 Japanese time.



/s/ Yoshisuke Ishiuchi                       /s/ Yoko Hiran
------------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Yoshisuke Ishiuchi                           witness



July 3, 2000               /s/ Tokyo Japan
-----------------------------------------------------
date / place





Bureau Toranomon 802, 2-7-16 Toranomon, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
Tel: 03-3502-0201
Archive

**COMMISSION ON STRUCTURAL ALTERNATIVES FOR THE****FEDERAL COURTS OF APPEALS**
**Public Hearing in Dallas, TX - March 25, 1998**
**Witness List**
  9:00 a.m. -  Judge Partick Higginbotham         U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit  
Judge Carolyn King           U.S. Court of appeals, 5th Circuit (TESTIMONY) 9:30 a.m. -  Judge Robert Parker         U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit  (TESTIMONY) 10:00 a.m. -  Sharon Freytag         Attorney at Law, Dallas, TX  (TESTIMONY)
Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 2461 Dir ID: 2013

- NM

- 202

- AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Orga nization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 10 / 15 /13

Regional Airline Association 10/15/13

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 10/15/13

ATA M Lopez 10/15/13
#### Thomas A. R. Webster, *Plaintiff in Error, v.*The People of the State of New York, *Defendants in Error.*

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Daniels, J.
June 12, 2015

Mr. Ted Juszczyk

JTM Solutions LLC 5103 Falling Leaves Lane McFarland, WI 53558

Dear Mr. Juszczyk :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 1, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 2016), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
(Reap. Dec. 8727)

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. of La., Inc., for: Torch Mfg. Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 15792, etc.

(Decided January 17, 1957, amending Reap. Dec. 8619)

*Joseph Winston*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision herein, present the question of the proper value of certain flashlights imported from Hong Kong.

The respective parties have submitted said appeals for decision upon a stipulation of fact to the effect that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the involved flashlights at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, is represented by the amounts specified as to each item on schedules “1” and *“2,”*attached to and made part of this decision, for the respective periods shown thereon, plus pacldng as invoiced in each case, and that there was no higher export value for merchandise similar to the flashlights here involved at the time of exportation thereof.

Upon the uncontroverted facts before the court, I find and hold that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the flashlights covered by the aforesaid appeals for a reappraisement, and that such value is represented by the amounts specified as to each item enumerated in schedules “1” and *“2,” supra,*for the respective periods shown thereon, plus packing as invoiced in each case.

As to the items of merchandise other than those enumerated in said schedules “1” and *“2,”*there is nothing before the court which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. Therefore, I find and hold *568that the proper values of such items are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.