alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(V. D. 58)

Entry No. 05241.

#### E. Leitz, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 11, 1957)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This matter is presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in *E. Leitz, Inc.*v. *United States,*36 Cust. Ct. 391, Abstract 59812. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matters be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matter has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values were as follows:

> Merchandise United States dollars per each

> 2 microscopes GO 48/92K_$146. 44

> 2 wooden containers to fit_ 12. 60

> less 28 per centum discount on each item

*535I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Insofar as the matter relates to all other merchandise, it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RockwoodSpecialties Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Zatta, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
| Date: May 15, 2006 | /s/ ROBERT J. ZATTA                               |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Robert J. Zatta                                   |
|                    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Companyfor purposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Order entered November 1, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00703-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

ASHLEY BETH GAMILL, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA13-49137

ORDER

The Court ORDERS court reporter Trashuna Salaam to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of 

the date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit no. 1, a DVD.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

Trashuna Salaam, official court reporter, County Criminal Court No. 7, and to counsel for all 

parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.46

NOTE

|              |  | December 18, 2002     
|------------- |  | ----------------------
|$5,000,000.00 |  | Minneapolis, Minnesota

The undersigned, for value received, promises to pay to the order of LaSalle Bank National Association (the
"Bank") at the principal office of LaSalle Bank National Association (the "Agent") in Chicago, Illinois
the aggregate unpaid amount of all Loans made to the undersigned by the Bank pursuant to the Credit Agreement referred to below (as shown on the schedule attached hereto (and any continuation thereof)
or in the records of the Bank), such principal amount to be payable on the dates set forth in the Credit Agreement.

The
undersigned further promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Loan from the date of such Loan until such Loan is paid in full, payable at the rate(s) and at the
time(s) set forth in the Credit Agreement. Payments of both principal and interest are to be made in lawful money of the United States of America.

This
Note evidences indebtedness incurred under, and is subject to the terms and provisions of, the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2002 (as
amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Credit Agreement"; terms not otherwise defined herein are used herein as defined in the Credit
Agreement), among the undersigned, certain financial institutions (including the Bank) and the Agent, to which Credit Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement of the terms and provisions
under which this Note may or must be paid prior to its due date or its due date accelerated.

This
Note is being executed and delivered in replacement of, but not in payment of: (a) that certain "Note" evidencing indebtedness to the Bank dated to be effective
September 15, 2000, made by the undersigned payable to the order of the Bank in the original principal amount of $20,000,000.00; and (b) that certain "Note" evidencing indebtedness to
the Harris Trust and Savings Bank ("Harris") dated to be effective September 15, 2000, made by the undersigned payable to the order of Harris in the original principal amount of $10,000,000.00; provided,however, that interest on such replaced notes accrued through the date hereof shall be payable
in accordance with the terms thereof.

This
Note is made under and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely within such State.

| |  | Fargo Electronics, Inc.                          
| |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                              
| |  | Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
#### Patterson Materials Corporation, Respondent, v Town of Pawling, New York et al., Defendants, and Gordon *610Douglas et al., Proposed Intervenors-Appellants.

[634 NYS2d 711]

—In an action for a judgment, *inter alia,*declaring Local Laws, 1993, Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the Town of Pawling to be null, void, illegal and unconstitutional, the proposed intervenorsdefendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered March 22, 1994, which denied their motion to intervene as party defendants.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion to intervene is granted and the intervenors’ proposed answer is deemed served.

The factual background of this case is set forth in *Patterson Materials Corp. v Town of Pawling*(221 AD2d 608 [decided herewith]).

Three proposed intervenors have sought leave to intervene as defendants. Two of the proposed intervenors are homeowner associations representing homeowners who are either adjacent or in close proximity to the parcel owned by the plaintiff in the Town of Pawling upon which the plaintiff seeks to conduct its mining operations. It is specifically alleged that the homeowners from one of these associations live in the "immediate vicinity” of the plaintiff’s parcel and that the homeowners from the other association live in a neighborhood that is approximately one mile away. Additionally, the co-chair of one of the homeowners associations, who lives adjacent to the parcel in question, seeks to intervene in his individual capacity.

The Supreme Court denied the motion to intervene. We reverse. At issue in this declaratory judgment action is the validity of four local laws, one of which places severe restrictions on the plaintiff’s mining operations. The proposed intervenors, as property owners either adjacent to or in close proximity to the parcel where the plaintiff’s operations might take place, have made various claims concerning the deleterious effect surface mining will have on their property. Such allegations concern the noise, dust, and traffic that would result if mining were permitted on the parcel in question. Under such circumstances, the proposed intervenors have established a "real and substantial interest” in the outcome of the action and permissive intervention should have been allowed *(see,*CPLR 1013; *Matter of Clinton v Summers,*144 AD2d 145; *Kaplen v Town of Haverstraw,*105 AD2d 690; *Matter of Village of Spring Val. v Village of Spring Val. Hous. Auth.,*33 AD2d 1037; *see also, Green-point Sav. Bank v McMann Enters.,*212 AD2d 647). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Appendix Table 1-4 

1

Appendix Table 1-4. Methods, reporting levels, and laboratories used for chemical analysis for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, Gulf of Mexico, 2010: trace and major elements and nutrients in whole sediment.[Method codes are from the National Water Information System (NWIS) database, and are defined in Table 1-6. Abbreviations: a, no reporting level because analyte was detected in all samples; CASRN, Chemical Abstracts Services Registry Number; na, not applicable; NWQL, National Water Quality Laboratory, Denver, Colorado; pcode, parameter code from the U.S. Geological Survey NWIS database; SCL, Sediment Chemistry Laboratory, Atlanta, Georgia; USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; mg/kg, milligram per kilogram]

Analyte CASRN Pcode1 Laboratory Method code Reporting level1 Units

Aluminum 7429-90-5 01396 USGS SCL PLA20 0.1–0.2 Percent

Antimony 7440-36-0 01098 USGS SCL HY017 0.1–0.2 mg/kgArsenic 7440-38-2 01003 USGS SCL HY017 a mg/kgBarium 7440-39-3 01376 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0–2.0 mg/kgBeryllium 7440-41-7 01377 USGS SCL PLA20 0.1–0.2 mg/kgCadmium 7440-43-9 01378 USGS SCL AA095 0.1–0.2 mg/kgCalcium 7440-70-2 01476 USGS SCL PLA20 0.1–0.2 Percent

Chromium 7440-47-3 01379 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0–2.0 mg/kgCobalt 7440-48-4 01380 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0–2.0 mg/kgCopper 7440-50-8 01381 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0–2.0 mg/kgIron 7439-89-6 01468 USGS SCL PLA20 0.1–0.2 Percent

Lead 7439-92-1 01382 USGS SCL AA095 1.0 mg/kgLithium 7439-93-2 01383 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0–2.0 mg/kgMagnesium 7439-95-4 01477 USGS SCL PLA20 0.1–0.2 Percent

Manganese 7439-96-5 01384 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0 mg/kgMercury 7439-97-6 01385 USGS SCL CV025 0.01 mg/kgMolybdenum 7439-98-7 01386 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0–2.0 mg/kgNickel 7440-02-0 01387 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0–2.0 mg/kg

Phosphorus 7723-14-0 01388 USGS SCL PLA20 a mg/kgPotassium 7440-09-7 01475 USGS SCL PLA20 0.1–0.2 Percent

Selenium 7782-49-2 01148 USGS SCL HY017 0.1–0.2 mg/kg

Silver 7440-22-4 01389 USGS SCL AA095 0.5–1.0 mg/kgSodium 7440-23-5 01474 USGS SCL PLA20 0.1 Percent

Strontium 7440-24-6 01390 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0 mg/kgSulfur 7704-34-9 01398 USGS SCL PLA20 0.01 Percent

Thallium 7440-28-0 34480 USGS SCL PLA20 50–100 mg/kgTin 7440-31-5 01391 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0–2.0 mg/kgTitanium 7440-32-6 01469 USGS SCL PLA20 0.01–0.02 Percent

Total carbon 7440-44-0 01394 USGS SCL CMB01 0.1 Percent

Total nitrogen na 01397 USGS SCL CMB01 0.01–0.1 PercentUranium 7440-61-1 01392 USGS SCL PLA20 50–100 mg/kgVanadium 7440-62-2 01088 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0–2.0 mg/kgZinc 7440-66-6 01393 USGS SCL PLA20 1.0–2.0 mg/kg

3Range in reporting levels for that analyte, analyzed by that method and laboratory. Reporting level is defined as the concentration set by a laboratory and used for reporting analytical results that are 

determined to be less than the detection level.
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section  906 of the Public  Company  Accounting  Reform and
Investor  Protection  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.  1350,  as adopted),  I, Claudio
Gianascio,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

         1. The  Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB  Amendment # 1 for the
period ended December 31, 2005, and to which this  Certification  is attached as
Exhibit 32.1 (the "PERIODIC  REPORT") fully  complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period  covered by the Periodic  Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated: May 10, 2006


S/ Claudio Gianascio
---------------------------------
Claudio Gianascio
CEO & CFO

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Oranco,  Inc. and will be retained by Oranco,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

THIS  CERTIFICATION   ACCOMPANIES  THIS  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SS.  906  OF  THE
SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED  "FILED" BY THE  COMPANY FOR
PURPOSES OF SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8342 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8342

   To amend title 31, United States Code, to include information on 
   improper payments under Federal programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2024

   Mr. Yakym (for himself, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Bergman, and Mr. Peters) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 31, United States Code, to include information on 
   improper payments under Federal programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improper Payments Transparency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUDING IMPROPER PAYMENT INFORMATION IN PRESIDENTS BUDGET 
              SUBMISSION.

    Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(40) information with respect to improper payment (as 
        such term is defined in section 3351) amounts and rates for 
        programs and activities at each executive agency required to 
        submit improper payment reports under subchapter IV of chapter 
        33, including--
                    ``(A) a narrative description, including a detailed 
                explanation with respect to why any improper payment 
                amounts and rates occurred and trends of--
                            ``(i) each program and activity whose 
                        improper payment amount and rates have 
                        increased or decreased on average over the 
                        previous three years; and
                            ``(ii) each program and activity whose 
                        improper payment amount and rates did not 
                        change over such years; and
                    ``(B) what corrective actions, including any such 
                action in any corrective action plan under section 
                3352(d), with respect to such programs and activities 
                are incomplete, and steps the executive agency will 
                take to address improper payment amount and rate 
                issues.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 46219.

#### Protest 36723-K of T. H. Lung Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Furuya*(7 Ct. Cust. Appls. 495, T. D. 37109) the dried edible seaweed in question was held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1722 as claimed.
**Exhibit 10.2**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 4TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

 

**This Amendment No. 4**tothe Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1999, as amended to date(the *“Agreement”*), by and between**eAcceleration Corp.**,a Delaware corporation (the *“Company”*),and **Diana T. Ballard**(*“Employee”*), is dated forreference purposes as of August 21, 2004 (this *“Amendment”*).

 

**Whereas**,the Company and Employee desire to amend the terms of the Agreement, pursuantto the terms and conditions set forth herein, as of the date hereof.

 

**Now, Therefore**,in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, andintending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1.                                     The first sentenceof Subparagraph (a) of Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended inits entirety as follows:

During the term ofemployment, Employee shall be employed by the Company as Vice-Chairman of theBoard or in such other equivalent positions with the Company and itsaffiliates, as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company, andshall also serve as a director of the Company.

 

2.                                       Subparagraph(a) of Paragraph 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety asfollows:

 

The Company shall pay toEmployee a salary at the rate of $52,000 per annum, payable in equal bi-weeklyinstallments, or in such other manner as shall be consistent with the Company’spayroll practices.

 

3.                                       Paragraph10 of the Agreement is hereby amended to delete in its entirety the referenceto Neil M. Kaufman and insert in its place “Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson,P.S., 500 Galland Building, 1221 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101-2925,Attention: Joel N. Bodansky.”

 

4.                                       Thechanges to the Agreement made by this Amendment shall be effective as of thedate hereof, and shall amend and supersede any provisions to the contrarycontained in the Agreement.  Except asexpressly amended by this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreementshall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms of theAgreement.

 

**(*signature page follows*)**

 

1

----

 

**In Witness Hereof**,the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

 
|   | **eAcceleration Corp.** |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | ** **              |
|   | By:                     | /s/ E. Edward Ahrens |   |
|   |                    | Name: E. Edward Ahrens |
|   |                    | Title: Chief Financial  Officer |
|   |                    |   |
|   |                    |   |
|   | **Employee:**           |
|   |                    |   |
|   | /s/ Diana T. Ballard    |   |
|   | Diana T. Ballard        |

 

2

----
Exhibit 32.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
the Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to
the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Winton Series.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                           
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                               
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                             
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                              
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                  
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 12, 2009
No. 45055.

#### Protest 826116-G of F. W. Woolworth Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the rubber mice in question are in part of bamboo and similar to those the subject of Abstract 40389. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 409 was therefore sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 8474)

#### Chelsea Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 9637, etc.

(Decided July 21, 1955)

*Siegel, Mandell & Daoidson*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*399Johnson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement listed on schedule hereto attached and made a part hereof at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for home consumption including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the invoice units of value set forth under Column 11 in German currency, packed. '

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher export value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Re-appraisement set forth in schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the invoice units of value set forth under column 11 in German currency. ■

Judgment will be entered accordingly.