alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ALAN F. PITTS, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

14 USCMA 327, 34 CMR 107

No. 17,217

December 20, 1963

*Colonel Joseph L. Chalk, Captain Gary G. Keltner,*and *Captain Ronald L. Gainer*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Francis M. Cooper*and *First Lieutenant Charles M. Pallesen, Jr.,*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

This is a companion case to United States v McAndrews, 14 USCMA 327, 34 CMR 107, and presents the same issue of the applicability to courts-martial of 18 USC §§ 5031-5036, the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act. In United States v Baker, 14 USCMA 311, 34 CMR 91, we held the Act does not apply to military trials. The decision of the board of review is, therefore, affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary L. Whitlock, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Gary L. WhitlockGary L. WhitlockPresident and Manager(Principal Executive Officer)March 25, 2011
TSCA Section 5(e) Consent Order for 

Premanufacture Notice (PMN) P-95-0169 

EPA Docket: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0669 

Effective November 27, 1998 

Contains No CBI Page 1 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 2 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 3 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 4 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 5 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 6 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 7 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 8 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 9 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 10 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 11 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 12 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 13 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 14 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 15 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 16 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 17 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 18 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 19 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 20 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 21 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 22 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 23 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 24 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 25 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 26 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 27 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 28 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 29 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 30 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 31 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 32 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 33 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 34 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 35 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 36 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 37 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 38 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 39 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 40 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 41 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 42 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 43 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 44 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 45 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 46 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 47 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 48 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 49 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 50 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 51 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 52 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 53 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 54 of 55
Contains No CBI Page 55 of 55
No. 59609.

protest 236948-K (Philadelphia).

#### Chas. Kurz Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended May 25, 1955, effective July 1, 1955, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64150-64151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22479]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9952-58-OA]

National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463, 
EPA gives notice of a public meeting of the National Advisory Council 
for Environmental Policy and Technology (NACEPT). NACEPT provides 
advice to the EPA Administrator on a broad range of environmental 
policy, technology, and management issues. NACEPT members represent 
academia, industry, non-governmental organizations, and state, local 
and tribal governments. The purpose of this meeting is for NACEPT to 
discuss the Council's draft report regarding actions that EPA should 
take in response to technological and sociological developments in the 
area of citizen science. A copy of the meeting agenda will be posted at 
http://www2.epa.gov/faca/nacept.

DATES: NACEPT will hold a public teleconference on October 17, 2016, 
from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. (EDT).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the EPA Headquarters, William 
Jefferson Clinton Federal Building East, Room 1132, 1201 Constitution 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Green, Designated Federal 
Officer, green.eugene@epa.gov, (202) 564-2432, U.S. EPA, Office of 
Resources, Operations and Management; Federal Advisory Committee 
Management Division (MC1601M), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20460.

[[Page 64151]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests to make oral comments or to provide 
written comments to NACEPT should be sent to Eugene Green at 
green.eugene@epa.gov by October 10, 2016. The teleconference is open to 
the public, with limited seating available on a first-come, first-
served basis. Members of the public wishing to participate in the 
teleconference should contact Eugene Green via email or calling (202) 
564-2432 no later than October 10, 2016.
    Meeting Access: Information regarding accessibility and/or 
accommodations for individuals with disabilities should be directed to 
Eugene Green at the email address or phone number listed above. To 
ensure adequate time for processing, please make requests for 
accommodations at least 10 days prior to the meeting.

    Dated: September 7, 2016.
Eugene Green,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-22479 Filed 9-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
No. 50549.

#### Protest 106783-K of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was held that as the French Trade Agreement specifically provides for duty on parts, such rate must prevail, even though the later British Trade Agreement provides for a lower rate of duty on cigar and cigarette lighters, since no modification of the rates of duty on parts was made in the said British Trade Agreement. In the absence of a specific provision therefor, parts of an article will not be included within an *eo nomine*designation of the article itself *(Murphy & Co.*v. *United States,*13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 256, T. D. 41201). The protest was overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8523 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8523

To require Transmission Organizations to allow bids from aggregators of 
           certain retail customers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2024

 Mr. Casten (for himself, Mr. Levin, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, 
and Mr. Tonko) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require Transmission Organizations to allow bids from aggregators of 
           certain retail customers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responsive Energy Demand Unlocks 
Clean Energy Act'' or the ``REDUCE Act''.

SEC. 2. AGGREGATOR BIDDING INTO ORGANIZED POWER MARKETS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any prohibition established by 
State law or a State commission (as such term is defined in section 
3(15) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 796(15))) with respect to who 
may bid into an organized wholesale electric market, each Transmission 
Organization shall, consistent with any applicable market rules that do 
not establish such prohibition, allow aggregators of retail customers 
to submit bids that aggregate demand flexibility of the customers of 
utilities that distributed more than 4 million megawatt-hours in the 
previous fiscal year.
    (b) Rulemaking.--Not later than 12 months after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
shall promulgate a final rule pursuant to subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### P. L., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. E. S., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Mr. Richard M. Glassner*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Cohn & Turin*for the respondent,

April 18, 1967.

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5733]


Advisory Committee on Democracy Promotion (ACDP) Meeting Notice

Notice of Public Meeting

    A meeting of the Advisory Committee on Democracy Promotion will be 
held on Monday, April 16, 2007, in Room 1107, U.S. Department of State, 
2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. 
and is expected to conclude at 1 p.m., and will be open to the public, 
up to the capacity of the meeting room. The Committee members will 
discuss various issues relating to strategies to promote democratic 
governance, with Secretary Rice participating from 10-10:45.
    Entry to the main State Department building is controlled and will 
require advance arrangements. Members of the public wishing to attend 
this meeting should, by Thursday, April 12, 2007, notify Karen Chen in 
the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, telephone: 202-647-
4648, of their name; date of birth; valid government-issued ID number 
(see below); citizenship; and professional affiliation, including 
address and telephone number in order to arrange admittance. This 
includes admittance for government employees as well as others.
    All attendees must use the ``C'' Street entrance of the Department, 
after being screened through the exterior screening facilities, and 
arrive at 9:30 a.m. to attend the Secretary's session. There will be no 
admittance after 9:50 a.m. until the completion of the Secretary's 
session. One of the following valid IDs will be required for 
admittance: any U.S. driver's license with photo, a passport, or a U.S. 
Government agency ID. Because an escort is required at all times, 
attendees should expect to remain in the meeting for the entire 
session.
    For more information, contact Paul Lettow, Senior Advisor to the 
Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs, Department of State, 
Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 647-1189.

    Dated: March 23, 2007.
Barry F. Lowenkron,
Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7-5807 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-18-P
**Exhibit 23**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTAUDITORS

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-Kof CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 333-109138 and 333-119988) of our report, dated February 9, 2009,relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statementsof operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31,2008 and 2007.

 

 

/s/ Trice Geary & Myers LLC

February 20, 2009

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Aladdin Systems Holdings, Inc., (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jonathan Kahn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


      (1)   The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1,
            fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant




Dated: April 14, 2004                           /s/  Jonathan Kahn
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Jonathan Kahn
                                                Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Franklin, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 100]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered November 9, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him as second felony offender, to a term of 8 to 16 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s complaint on appeal that his sentence was unduly harsh and should be reduced is wholly devoid of merit. The plea entered by defendant was entered in satisfaction of the entire indictment and was within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should *302be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.)

We note that even when, as here, a defendant does not challenge the validity of his plea, appellate review of the propriety of the sentence imposed necessitates an examination of multiple factors, including the circumstances surrounding the entry by the court, defendant and the People into the given plea bargain. This means, of course, that if, as part of a plea bargain, the People have agreed to forego further prosecution of any other charges or to dismiss certain counts of an indictment as covered, such terms should be fully explained to the reviewing court. Here, our review of the record demonstrates that the brief filed on behalf of defendant, even when cast in the favorable light of being the product of zealous advocacy, is notable for its omission of a candid and complete description of the making of this particular plea bargain.

After extended plea negotiations, during which the court permitted defendant to consult with his family, and granted a recess, defendant voluntarily entered a plea to the gunpoint robbery of a parking lot superintendent in full satisfaction of the indictment against him. In urging that his sentence is excessive, defendant argues that "[n]obody was injured in the incident” to which he pleaded guilty. While such a statement is true as to the particular count of robbery to which defendant was permitted to plead in full satisfaction of the indictment, pointedly absent from appellant’s brief is a description of the facts of the other incident that was the subject of this indictment except for a passing reference buried in a footnote. The footnote states that the indictment "covered two unrelated incidents and charged him with attempted murder in the second degree, five counts of robbery in the first degree, and related weapons offenses.” In this other incident, covered by defendant’s plea, the victim, a cab driver on duty, was shot in the small of his back, causing serious and permanent injuries to his digestive system and impairing his ability to walk. Thus, under *all*the circumstances, the sentence imposed was not unduly harsh. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.
#### Josephine Robinson et al., Plaintiffs, v Jewish Hospital and Medical Center of Brooklyn et al., Defendants. Jewish Hospital and Medical Center of Brooklyn et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Anesthesiology Service et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. Jewish Hospital and Medical Center et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Adel Aziz, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 792]

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the second third-party defendant Adel Aziz appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated April 25, 1994, entered upon an amended order of the same court, dated March 22, 1994, granting the motion of the defendants first and second third-party plaintiffs Jewish Hospital and Medical Center of Brooklyn and Sunetha Reddy for summary judgment on their second third-party complaint, as is in favor of them and against him in the principal sum of $350,000. Adel Aziz’s notice of appeal from the amended order dated March 22, 1994, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment *(see,*CPLR 5520 [c]).

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, the amended order is vacated, and the motion of the second third-party plaintiffs Jewish Hospital and Medical Center of Brooklyn and Sunetha Reddy for summary judgment is denied, with costs.

The issues presented on this appeal are, *inter alia,*whether Obstetrical Anesthesia Service (hereinafter OAS) was a partnership and whether the appellant, Adel Aziz, was a partner in OAS. "When determining whether a partnership (or a joint venture) exists, 'the factors to be considered are the intent of the parties (express or implied), whether there was joint control and management of the business, whether there was a sharing of the profits as well as a sharing of the losses, and whether there was a combination of property, skill, or knowledge’ ” *(Boyarsky v Froccaro,*131 AD2d 710, 712; *see also, Kyle v Ford,*184 AD2d 1036). In this case, there are questions of fact, *inter alia,*concerning whether OAS is actually a partnership ánd whether Adel Aziz intended to be a partner in OAS. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment should have been denied.

We have reviewed the parties’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur. *[See,*136 Mise 2d 880.]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Geology and hydrogeology of theCaribbean islands aquifer system of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and theU.S. Virgin Islands**
 
Book
 
Plates: One | Two | Three| Four | Five
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1419
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001052882
 
April 16, 2018
No. 56046.

protests 134721-K, etc. (New York).

#### Ace Lapidary Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400-the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.2

724 SOLUTIONS INC.

Section 1350 Certification

In
connection with the periodic report of 724 Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Glenn Barrett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

|Date: March 16, 2004 |  | /s/GLENN BARRETTGlenn Barrett
Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice-President, Corporate Services
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K / A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Emmanuel Tsoupanarias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 19, 2010


/s/ Emmanuel TsoupanariasEmmanuel TsoupanariasChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and will be retained by Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 55325.

#### Butler Bros. *v.*United States,

protest 151944-K (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.