alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 46222.

#### Protest 58315-K/90279 of Kai Jensen (Chicago).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. There was nothing in the record to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

RICKY ALONZO JOHNSON,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 590 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
!" #$ %

 & '(  !!"#! ) $$%
&$$  * % '( ++%)$! &* ,-	.)/	+& -0	1%22%.&	++3
" + -0	1%22%.&	4	
*) *5/*6 %

 #!","- 

./ 

!!0$	!!0
 

#    




	

	



 

 !"!#!$#

%
&
' ()*
') + *!

' 

#    




  		 

 !""#$#%#&
%
'( ) !*
( "+"!
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lorne Lilley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sunergy, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sunergy, Inc.



Date:  May 14, 2008

By:



Lorne Lilley, Secretary, Treasurer

and principal accounting officer
No. 49734.

#### Protests 974595-G, etc., of Daimaru Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Mutual Supply Co.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 136, C. D. 842). The protests were sustained to that extent.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September      28, 2010 | /s/      Jianhua Lv                |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                     | Jianhua      Lv                    |
|                                     | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                                     | (Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6937

AHMAD CLARENCE GARLAND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director, of South Carolina

Department of Corrections; BENJAMIN MONTGOMERY, Deputy Director of Operations, South

Carolina Department of Corrections; GERALDINE

P. MIRO, Warden of Allendale Correctional

Institution; RICHARD MCCANTS, Associate Warden

ACI; BETSY ALBRITTON; RICKY GRIMES; MITCHELL

ODOM; KEN LONG; ANN HALLMAN; MITCHELL LESTER;

GEORGE DUKES; GENE SANDERS; OFFICER HEYWARD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-00-938-4-19BF)

Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 31, 2000

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmad Clarence Garland, Appellant Pro Se.
* Although the district court’s order is marked as filed on

June 14, 2000, the court’s records show that it was entered on the

docket sheet on June 15, 2000. It is the date the order was

entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of

the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a);

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ahmad Clarence Garland appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Garland v. Catoe, No. CA-00-938-4-19BF (D.S.C.

June 15, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Worcester Royal Porcelain Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6299.

Entry No. 771220, etc.

Invoices dated Worcester, England, April 23, 1941, etc.

Certified May 6, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 28, 1941.

(Decided July 29, 1946)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard F. Weeks,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise consisting of ehinaware (whether dutiable under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or otherwise) and the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the attached schedule are the samé in all material respects as the merchandise and issues decided in *United States*v. *William S. Pitcairn Corp.,*
>       *265Suit No. 4513, C. A. D. 334, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the appraised value of the merchandise consisting of chinaware (whether dutiable under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or otherwise) involved in each of the cases enumerated in the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for the determination of tbe value of the chinaware here involved (whether dutiable under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or otherwise), and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Craig D. Abolt, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MSW Energy Holdings LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 4, 2006         By: /s/ Craig D. Abolt             Craig D. Abolt      Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 24.0


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


The  undersigned,  members of the Board of  Directors of CE  GENERATION,  LLC, a
corporation  registered  in  the  State  of  Delaware  (the  "Company"),  hereby
constitutes  and appoints  Douglas L.  Anderson and Paul J. Leighton and each of
them, as his/her true and lawful  attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution  and  resubstitution,  for  and in  his/her  stead,  in any and all
capacities,  to sign on his/her behalf the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for
the fiscal year ending  December 31, 2002 and to execute any amendments  thereto
and to file the same,  with all  exhibits  thereto,  and all other  documents in
connection therewith,  with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
and  applicable  stock  exchanges,  with the full power and  authority to do and
perform  each and every act and thing  necessary or advisable to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person,  hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said  attorney-in-fact and agent or his/her substitute or substitutes,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated as of March 28, 2003


/s/ Ian A Bourne
----------------
Ian A. Bourne


/s/ J. Thomas Coyle
-------------------
J. Thomas Coyle
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30229

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN E. MILTON, III, Also Known as Boo Milton,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

No. 3:96-CR-17-1

No. 3:09-CV-987

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John E. Milton, III, federal prisoner # 24395-034, was convicted of conUnited States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 19, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30229 Document: 00511637263 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/19/2011
No. 11-30229

spiring to possess crack and powder cocaine with intent to distribute. He challenges the denial of a motion that he labeled as arising under Federal Rule of

Criminal Procedure 36. His request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED

as unnecessary, because he is not challenging “the final order in a proceeding

under” 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). 

In his filing with this court, Milton contends that relief under Rule 36 is

proper because his arguments concerning the district court’s alleged failure to

comply with certain portions of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 relate to

ministerial matters. We disagree and discern no error in the district court’s

holding that Milton’s motion, which raised a claim that did not pertain to a clerical matter and that could have been presented earlier, was an unauthorized successive § 2255 motion. See United States v. Orozco-Ramirez, 211 F.3d 862, 867

(5th Cir. 2000); United States v. Key, 205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir. 2000); 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255(h). 

The judgment is AFFIRMED, and Milton’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis is DENIED.

2

Case: 11-30229 Document: 00511637263 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/19/2011
Getting Purse-onal

Federal Trade Commission ■ Bureau of Consumer Protection ■ Office of Consumer and Business Education

FTC Consumer Alert

Psst...Want to know a secret? A lost or stolen wallet or purse is a gold mine of information for a

new kind of crook ó the identity thief.

Identity thieves can use information found in your wallet or purse ó from credit cards, checks, your

Social Security card, even health insurance cards ó to establish new accounts in your name. That could

create an identity crisis that can take months to detect, and even longer to unravel.

If your wallet or purse is lost or stolen, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) suggests that you:

● File a report with the police immediately. Get a copy in case your bank, credit card company or

insurance company needs proof of the crime.

● Cancel each credit and charge card. Get new cards with new account numbers.

● Call the fraud departments of the major credit reporting agencies: Equifax (800) 525-6285;

Experian (888) 397-3742; TransUnion (800) 680-7289. Ask them to put a ìfraud alertî on your

account and add a ìvictimís statementî to your file requesting that creditors contact you before

opening new accounts in your name.

● Ask the credit bureaus for copies of your credit reports. Review your reports carefully to make

sure no additional fraudulent accounts have been opened in your name or unauthorized changes

made to your existing accounts. In a few months, order new copies of your reports to verify

your corrections and changes, and to make sure no new fraudulent activity has occurred.

● Report the loss to your bank if your wallet or purse contained bank account information, including account numbers, ATM cards or checks. Cancel checking and savings accounts and open

new ones. Stop payments on outstanding checks.

● Get a new ATM card, account number and Personal Identification Number (PIN) or password.

● Report your missing driverís license to the department of motor vehicles. If your state uses your

Social Security number as your driverís license number, ask to substitute another number.

● Change the locks on your home and car if your keys were taken. Donít give an identity thief

access to even more personal property and information.

If youíve been a victim of identity theft, file a complaint with the FTC by contacting the FTCís

Identity Theft Hotline by telephone: toll-free 1-877-IDTHEFT (438-4338); TDD: 202-326-2502; by

mail: Identity Theft Clearinghouse, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580; or online: www.consumer.gov/idtheft. Ask for a copy of ID Theft: When Bad

Things Happen to Your Good Name, a free comprehensive consumer guide to help you guard against

and recover from identity theft.

Toll-free 1-877-IDTHEFT www.consumer.gov/idtheft February 2000
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Written Statement of Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer****Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying withSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not deemed to be filed pursuant to the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q accompanying this statement.

 

The undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and thePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Falcon Financial Investment Trust (the“Company”), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)                                  the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2004 filed on thedate hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Vernon B. Schwartz                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Vernon B. Schwartz                    |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  |
|   | August 16, 2004                       |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ David A. Karp                     |   |
|   | David A. Karp                         |
|   | President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | August 16, 2004                       |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
### Adjustments to U.S. Geological Survey peak-flow magnitude-frequency relations in Delaware and Maryland following Hurricane Floyd, September 1999

By: Edward J. Doheny**Jonathan J.A. Dillow

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs15202

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondents, *v.*John Welch, *Appellant*.

Judgment and conviction affirmed, and proceedings remitted to the Herkimer Oyer and Terminer to proceed therein. Opinion by Hardin, J.
#### J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. (Bell *&*Howell Co.), et al. *v.*United States

No. 6630.

Entry No. 1496, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, September 26, 1941, etc. -

Certified September 26, 1941, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., November 10, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 17, 1946)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell/Graham Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                         
|Robert J. Enck                                                             
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC,     
|the Managing Owner of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                           
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                            
|Brent Bales                                                                
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC,                   
|the Managing Owner of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                           
|Date: May 10, 2007
No. 48598.

#### Protests 981582-G, etc., of A. Newberg, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of miniature figures representing both human and animal forms, none of which is a toy. Following *Schmidt*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 188, C. D. 690) the protests were sustained.