### 14507 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 50 / Friday, March 14, 2014 / Notices

period, which closed on October 25,

2013.

The EPA reviewed each comment received and prepared a Response to Comments document for the two projects. After consideration of the expressed view of all interested persons, the pertinent federal statutes and regulations, the applications and supplemental information submitted by the applicants, and additional material relevant to the applications and contained in the Administrative Records, the EPA made final determinations in accordance with title 40 CFR part 52 and part 55 (for Statoil) to issue final air permits.

Under 40 CFR 124.19(f)(2), notice of any final Agency action regarding a PSD permit must be published in the Federal Register. Section 307(b)(1) of the CAA provides for review of final Agency action that is locally or regionally applicable in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit. Such a petition for review of final Agency action must be filed within 60 days from the date of notice of such action in the Federal Register. For purposes of judicial review under the CAA, final Agency action occurs when a final PSD permit is issued or denied by the EPA and Agency review procedures are exhausted, per 40 CFR 124.19(f)(1).

Any person who filed comments on the draft permits was provided the opportunity to petition the Environmental Appeals Board by the end of November 26, 2013 for the Statoil permit, by the end of December 26, 2013 for the PEEC permit, or by the end of January 17, 2014 for the TECO permit. No petitions were submitted for any of these permits. Therefore, the Statoil permit became effective on November 27, 2013. The PEEC permit became effective on December 27, 2013. This date was changed from December 25, 2013, as stated on the final permit, to correct for the effective date coinciding with a federal holiday. The TECO permit became effective on January 18,

2014.

Dated: February 27, 2014. Carol L. Kemker, Acting Director, Air, Pesticides and Toxics, Management Division, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2014–05737 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**[FRL–9907–84–Region–10]**

**Final Modification of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination**  **System (NPDES) General Permit (GP) for Small Suction Dredges in Idaho,**  **IDG370000**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Final notice of modification of a general permit.

**SUMMARY :**  When the 2013 General Permit (GP) was issued, the language of the GP contained a discrepancy with the total maximum daily load (TMDL) that was issued for Mores Creek. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed to modify the permit on December 18, 2013, and provided a 45 day comment period. EPA prepared a Response to Comments and modified the GP so it now includes the tributaries of Mores, Elk or Grimes creeks in the loading allocations of the TMDL and a list of these tributaries in Appendix F.

**DATES :**  The modified GP will be effective on April 14, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  Copies of the modified general permit, Statement of Basis and Response to Comments are available upon request. Requests may be made to Tracy DeGering at (208) 378–5756 or to Cindi Godsey at (907) 271–6561. Requests may also be electronically mailed to: degering.tracy@epa.gov or godsey.cindi@epa.gov

.

Written requests may be submitted to EPA, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, OWW–130, Seattle, WA
98101.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  The GP, Statement of Basis and Response to Comments along with detailed maps and other useful information may be found on the Region 10 Web site at: http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/water.nsf/ npdes+permits/idsuction-gp

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Executive Order 12866: The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from the review requirements of Executive Order 12866 pursuant to Section 6 of that order.

Regulatory Flexibility Act: Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., a Federal agency must prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis ‘‘for any proposed rule’’ for which the agency ‘‘is required by section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), or any other law, to publish general notice of proposed rulemaking.’’ The RFA exempts from this requirement any rule that the issuing agency certifies ‘‘will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.’’ EPA has concluded that NPDES general permits are permits, not rulemakings, under the APA and thus not subject to APA rulemaking requirements or the RFA. Notwithstanding that general permits are not subject to the RFA, EPA has determined that these general permits, as issued, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Dated: March 5, 2014. Daniel D. Opalski, Director, Office of Water & Watersheds, Region 10, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014–05724 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9907–95–Region–4; CERCLA–04– 2013–3763]** 

**LWD, Inc. Superfund Site; Calverty City, Marshall County, Kentucky;**  **Notice of Settlement**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of Settlement.

**SUMMARY :**  Under 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has entered into a settlement with the approximately fifty (50) parties concerning the LWD, Inc. Superfund Site located in Calvert City, Marshall County, Kentucky. The settlementaddresses remaining costs from a fundlead Removal Action taken by the EPA at the Site.

**DATES :**  The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until April 14, 2014. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the amended settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

**ADDRESSES :**  Copies of the settlement are available from the Agency by contacting Ms. Paula V. Painter, Environmental Protection Specialist using the contact information provided in this notice. Comments may also be submitted by referencing the Site’s name through one of the following methods:


### 14508 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 50 / Friday, March 14, 2014 / Notices

• Internet: www.epa.gov/region4/ superfund/programs/enforcement/ enforcement.html.

• U.S. Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund Division, Attn: Paula V. Painter, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

• Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Paula V. Painter at 404/562–8887

Dated: February 21, 2014. Anita L. Davis, Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–05695 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications**  **Commission**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for
comments.

**SUMMARY :**  As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.

**DATES :**  Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before May 13, 2014. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

**ADDRESSES :**  Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@ fcc.gov <mailto:PRA@fcc.gov> and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov <mailto:Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov>

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For additional information about the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418–2918.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0750. Title: 47 CFR 73.671, Educational and Informational Programming for Children; 47 CFR Section 73.673, Public Information Initiatives Regarding Educational and informational Programming for Children.

Form Number: Not applicable. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.

Number of Respondents and Responses: 2,303 respondents; 4,215
responses.

Estimated Time per Response: 1 to 5 minutes.

Frequency of Response: Third party disclosure requirement.

Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain benefits. The statutory authority for this collection is contained in Sections 154(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.

Total Annual Burden: 30,865 hours. Total Annual Cost: None. Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact(s).

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for confidentiality with this collection of information.

Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 73.671(c)(5) states that a core educational television program must be identified as specifically designed to educate and inform children by the display on the television screen throughout the program of the symbol E/I.

47 CFR 73.673 states each commercial television broadcast station licensee must provide information identifying programming specifically designed to educate and inform children to publishers of program guides. Such information must include an indication of the age group for which the program is intended.

These requirements are intended to provide greater clarity about broadcasters’ obligations under the Children’s Television Act (CTA) of 1990 to air programming ‘‘specifically designed’’ to serve the educational and informational needs of children and to improve public access to information about the availability of these programs. These requirements provide better information to the public about the shows broadcasters’ air to satisfy their obligation to provide educational and informational programming under the CTA.

Federal Communications Commission. Gloria J. Miles, Federal Register Liaison, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2014–05703 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6712–01–P**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications**  **Commission Under Delegated Authority** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for
comments.

**SUMMARY :**  As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520), the Federal Communications Commission invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection(s). Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid OMB control number.