alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Zatta, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 12,   2011                                |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                |   |   |
| /s/ ROBERT J.   ZATTA                               |   |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                                     |   |   |
| Senior Vice   President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Robert J. Zatta, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 6, 2010                         |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/ ROBERT  J. ZATTA                          |   |
| Robert  J. Zatta                                   |   |
| Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

Thiscertification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of Trans-Century Resources, Inc. (the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mary W. Patterson, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Mary W. Patterson

Mary W. Patterson

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer



Dated:  June 20, 2005
No. 56517.

protests 178529-K, etc. (New York).

#### Aimcee Wholesale Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 64957.

#### Home Lines Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/33446 (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, 'by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
No. 47957.

#### Protest 968224-G of Alliance Distributors, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 10.6


Base Salaries of Executive Officers of the Registrant







As of April 1, 2015, the following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) of the executive officers of Old Point Financial Corporation:







	
Robert F. Shuford, Sr.


Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer


Old Point Financial Corporation


 

	 	
$

	
300,000

	 
	
Louis G. Morris


Executive Vice President/OPNB


Old Point Financial Corporation


 

	 	
$

	
300,000

	 
	
Robert F. Shuford, Jr.


Senior Vice President/Operations


Old Point Financial Corporation


 

	 	
$

	
283,700

	 
	
Joseph R. Witt


Senior Vice President/Corporate Banking


Old Point Financial Corporation


 

	 	
$

	
280,000

	 
	
Laurie D. Grabow


Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President/Finance


Old Point Financial Corporation


 

	 	
$

	
200,000

	 
	
Eugene M. Jordan, II


Executive Vice President/Trust


Old Point Financial Corporation


 

	 	
$

	
180,000
No. 60906.

#### G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc., and Barian Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 275000-K, etc. (New York).

*550Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle lamps similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Eric Wedemeyer*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 141, C. D. 556), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 38906.

#### Protests 427355-G, etc., of S. H. Pomerance Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
#### McFadden et al., Appellants, *v.*Fritz et al.

Argued January 21, 1969.

Before Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ,

*551April 23, 1969:

*Melvin E. Caine,*with him *Caine, DiPasqua & Edelson,*for appellants.

*Edward F. Cantlin,*with him *Hinkson & Cantlin,*for appellee.

Opinion

Pee Cubiam,

Judgments affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Bell took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
No. 52375.

protests 928899-G, etc. (Seattle).

#### B. R. Anderson & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of imitation gut similar in all material respects to that the classification of which was involved in *Bush*v. *United States*(34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### People v Fuller.

(Docket No. 59892.)

Betty Ann Fuller, *in propria persona,*appellant.

Request for appointment of counsel denied.

Case below, Court of Appeals No. 26821, memorandum opinion, of February 9, 1977.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LLOYD RUNCIE and VALERIE T. RUNCIE
, Appellant s ,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK

AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS

OF THE CWALT 2004

- 22CB MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004

- 22CB
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2023

- 1639

[ July 18, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Roger B. Colton , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502019CA002406

.

Lloyd Runcie and Valerie T. Runcie, Royal Palm Beach, pro se.

Adam A. Diaz of Diaz Anselmo & Associates P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER CURIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH
, C.J.

, M AY and D AMOORGIAN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 63157.

#### Judson Sheldon International and National Carloading Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 58/19303 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
#### Michael Dickstein, Plaintiff, v Sarwil Associates et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. ADT Security Systems, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[634 NYS2d 399]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal from an *497order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered June 16, 1994, which denied as premature their motion for summary judgment against the third-party defendant.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted on the condition that the plaintiff recover damages from the appellants in the main action.

The appellants are conditionally entitled to summary judgment, pending determination of the main action, on their claims for common-law and contractual indemnification against the third-party defendant. Any recovery against the appellants in the main action would be based solely on their vicarious liability for the negligence or wrongful acts of the third-party defendant *(see, Richardson v Matarese,*206 AD2d 354; *Dunlap v United Health Servs.,*189 AD2d 1072). The appellants did not control, direct, or supervise the work performed by the plaintiff, an employee of the third-party defendant *(see, Richardson v Matarese, supra; Brown v U.S. Vanadium Corp.,*198 AD2d 863). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Frontier Fund.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                              
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                            
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund



|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                             
|Brent Bales Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                            
|Date: November 13, 2007
No. 64224.

protest 59/26079 (New York).

#### D. N. & E. Walter & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-23-00328-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 4

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1796798

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

CHRISTIAN J. SCHROEDER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After Appellant Christian J. Schroeder filed a motion to set bond, the trial 

entered an order denying him bond. Proceeding pro se, Appellant now attempts to 

appeal that order. But an interlocutory order ruling on a motion to set bond is not

appealable. See Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Conley v. 

State, Nos. 02-21-00090-CR, 02-21-00091-CR, 02-21-00093-CR, 2021 WL 3793816, at 

*1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 26, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication).

Because there is no record of an appealable order or judgment, and because 

such an order or judgment is necessary for this court to obtain jurisdiction, see Conley, 

2021 WL 3793816, at *1, we notified Appellant of our concern that we lacked 

jurisdiction over his appeal. We warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction unless, within ten days, Appellant or any other party showed grounds for 

continuing it. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f), 44.3. Appellant responded by filing with 

the trial court a document entitled “DEMAND TO ACKNOWLEDGE VALID 

APPEAL,” which the trial court filed with us. This document catalogues Appellant’s

numerous complaints, but it does not show grounds for this court to exercise 

jurisdiction over his appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 

43.2(f); see Ragston, 424 S.W.3d at 50–52 (affirming dismissal of appeal for want of 
3

jurisdiction in similar case); Conley, 2021 WL 3793816, at *1 (dismissing appeals for 

want of jurisdiction in similar case).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: January 18, 2024
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Winton Series.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                       
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|



|                                                                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                            
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|

Date: November 26, 2008
[LETTERHEAD OF MDM]



April 4, 2003







United States Securities and Exchange Commission







Dear Sirs/Mesdames:



Re:

Rio Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd.

Form 20-F Annual Report (Amendment No.1)

Consent of Expert



The undersigned, Metallurgical Design and Management (Pty) Ltd., hereby states as follows:



Our firm was engaged to prepare the Technical Report entitled Summary  Feasibility Study Aguablanca Project dated July 2002 (the Report) for Rio Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd. (the Company), portions of which are summarized in Item 4. Information on the Company -- D.  Property, Plant and Equipment  Base Metal Development  Project  Aguablanca Project  Bankable Feasibility Study in Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F (this Annual Report (Amendment No.1)), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



We hereby consent to a reference to our firm as having reviewed the matters set forth in Item 4. Information on the Company  A. Recent Developments -- Off-take Agreement Signed for Aguablanca Project in this Annual Report (Amendment No.1), and we further consent to the incorporation in this Annual Report (Amendment No.1) of the summary information concerning the Report, including the reference to our firm included with such information.



Sincerely,





/s/ D. Dodd



DAVID DODD

Technical Director

Metallurgical Design and Management (Pty) Ltd.
No. 65590.

#### The May Company and Hutzler Bros. Company *v.*United States,

protests 60/7445 and 60/2424 (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Lawrence, .1.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

June 29, 1938

No. 38924.

#### Protest 834347-G of Reynolds Metals Co. (Louisville).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the protest was sustained.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,494-03

IN RE TONY ANTHONY TRAYLOR JR, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 241-0710-13 IN THE 241ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O PINION

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this

Court’s original jurisdiction. He contends that he requested a copy of an 11.07 habeas application

form but the County Clerk failed to respond.

On March 15, 2023, this Court held this application in abeyance and ordered the District

Clerk of Smith County to respond. The Clerk states Relator requested an 11.07 habeas application,

but their records do not indicate that a form was sent in response to that request.

We conditionally grant mandamus relief and direct the Respondent to respond to Relator’s

request by sending him the requested copy. The writ of mandamus will issue only in the event the

Respondent fails to comply within thirty days of the date of this opinion. 
2

Filed: May 17, 2023

Do not publish
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 9, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128429 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

NORA KATHLEEN CHAHBAZI, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices v SC: 128429 

 COA: 259047 

Genesee CC: 01-234194-DM 

JOHN CLARK CHAHBAZI,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 30, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1102 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 9, 2005 

Clerk
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Welch, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 565]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed (see, *People v Saunders,*190 AD2d 1092, 1093, *lv denied*81 NY2d 1019). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—Arson, 3rd Degree.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                        |  |                        |  |                                              
|--------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Name                                    |  | State of Incorporation |  | Name Under Which SuchSubsidiary Does Business
|Frontier Fund Trading Company I LLC     |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                        |  |                       
|Frontier Fund Trading Company II LLC    |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                        |  |                       
|Frontier Fund Trading Company III LLC   |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                        |  |                       
|Frontier Fund Trading Company V LLC     |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                        |  |                       
|Frontier Fund Trading Company VI LLC    |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                        |  |                       
|Frontier Fund Trading Company VII, LLC  |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                        |  |                       
|Frontier Fund Trading Company VIII, LLC |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                        |  |                       
|Frontier Fund Trading Company IX, LLC   |  | Delaware               |  | Same