alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8320 

To allow taxpayers to indicate whether the Federal income taxes they pay 

should be used for domestic or international purposes, to rescind certain 

balances made available to the Internal Revenue Service, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Mr. NEHLS (for himself and Mr. MOORE of Alabama) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To allow taxpayers to indicate whether the Federal income 

taxes they pay should be used for domestic or international purposes, to rescind certain balances made available to the Internal Revenue Service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spend It At Home 

5 Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8320 IH

1 SEC. 2. TAXPAYER DETERMINATION OF WHETHER FED2 ERAL INCOME TAXES SHOULD BE USED FOR 

3 DOMESTIC OR INTERNATIONAL PURPOSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury 

5 shall ensure that each Federal income tax form includes 

6 a provision that allows the taxpayer to indicate whether 

7 the Federal income taxes paid by the taxpayer with re8 spect to the taxable year to which such tax form relates 

9 should be used by the Federal Government for— 

10 (1) domestic purposes, or 

11 (2) international purposes. 

12 (b) PUBLIC REPORTING OF INFORMATION.—The 

13 Secretary of the Treasury shall annually make publicly 

14 available the following information obtained pursuant to 

15 subsection (a) with respect to taxable years beginning in 

16 each calendar year: 

17 (1) The aggregate amount of Federal income 

18 taxes that taxpayers indicated should be used for 

19 purposes described in paragraph (1) or (2) of sub20 section (a) (stated separately for each such para21 graph). 

22 (2) The aggregate number of taxpayers (deter23 mined by treated joint returns as 2 taxpayers) who 

24 indicated that their Federal income taxes should be 

25 used for the purposes described in paragraph (1) or 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8320 IH

1 (2) of subsection (a) (stated separately for each such 

2 paragraph). 

3 SEC. 3. RESCISSION OF CERTAIN BALANCES MADE AVAIL4 ABLE TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. 

5 The unobligated balances of amounts appropriated or 

6 otherwise made available for activities of the Internal Rev7 enue Service by paragraphs (1)(A)(ii), (1)(A)(iii), (1)(B), 

8 (2), (3), (4), and (5) of section 10301 of Public Law 117– 

9 169 (commonly known as the ‘‘Inflation Reduction Act of 

10 2022’’) as of the date of the enactment of this Act are 

11 rescinded. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 49747.

#### Protest 101178-K of Louis Wolf & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

An examination of the record disclosed that certain of the items in question are similar to those involved in Abstract 48406. In accordance therewith the claim at 40 percent was sustained as to these items.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. CP05-150-003] 

Take notice that on March 19, 2007, Hardy Storage Company, LLC (Hardy) tendered a filing to place its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective date of April 1, 2007.

Original Sheet No. 10 

Original Sheet No. 13 

Original Sheet No. 22 

Original Sheet No. 23 

Hardy states that copies of its filing are being served to its firm customers, interruptible customers, and affected state commissions. 

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 26, 2007.                 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-5512 Filed 3-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   7-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-07-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       300
<OTHER-SE>                                     (300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (205)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.31)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2005, (the “Report”) of UTEK Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, herebycertify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theRegistrant.
#### John Moench, Resp’t, *v.*Mary Yung, App’lt.

*(New York Common Pleas, General Term,*

*Filed February 10, 1890.)*

Summary proceedings—Disorderly house.

To render a tenant liable to ejectment under the statute, for keeping a disorderly house, knowledge of the immoral acts complained of must be brought home to her, and it must be shown that she had authority to prevent them.

Appeal from final order of the ninth judicial district court.

Summary proceedings to eject defendant on the ground that she kept a house of assignation.

*C. M. Preyer,*for resp’t; *W. H. Knox,*for app’lt.

Larreitore, Oh. J.

*The gravamen*of the charge against the appellant must depend upon her knowledge, actual or presumptive, of the alleged offense. *King*v. *People,*83 N. Y., 587.

*732It is not disputed that the appellant had an intelligence office tor the employment of help. She was not responsible for the moral character of the many applicants who sought to avail themselves of her services. They were not in her immediate employ, nor had she the control of their actions after their application for services had been made. To hold her liable under a statute which is strictly penal in its character, knowledge must be brought home to her of the immoral acts complained of, and that she had the authority to prevent them. That these applicants gathered in a hallway common to the whole building and were guilty of improper acts without the knowledge or acquiescence of the appellant, furnished no ground for complaint or cause of action.

It appears that several.members of appellant’s family resided with her and that the bed cha'mber accommodation of her apartments were not more than sufficient for her use. The dinner table scenes, set forth in the return, may have been the result of over-exuberance and hilarity, but nothing of a criminal or immoral act appears to have resulted therefrom.

As the judge did charge the jury upon one request of appellant’s counsel, his refusal to charge the request as to appellant’s knowledge of the transaction complained of, was error, and possibly may have misled the jury.

I think the proceeding should be set aside and a rehearing had, with costs to abide the event. ^

Daly, J., concurs.
(Reap. Dec. 9572)

#### H. Muehlstein & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 742207-1/2, etc.

(Decided December 23, 1959)

*Sharretts, Paley £ Garter*for the plaintiffs.

*George Goohran DouT),*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

MollisoN, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule “A” for decision upon a stipulation, on the basis of which I find that foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, is the proper basis of value for the merchandise here involved, and that such value in each case is the price shown on schedule “B,” also hereto attached, plus the cost of packing, as shown on the invoices.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

> Schedule B

> Description of Value (unpacked) in skillings and pence Appeal No. merchandise

> Hard rubber dust 70/30S 255052-A/1818-55 3/1

> Hard rubber dust 70/30S 255053-A/1819-55 3/11

> Ebonite Dust 70/30S 255054-A/1820-55 3/11

> Hard rubber dust 70/30S 255055-A/1821-55 2/6-1/2

> Ebonite Dust 70/30S 255057-A/1846-55 3/11

> Ebonite Dust No. 3 255058-A/1847-55 2/3

> Hard rubber dust 70/30S 3/11

> Ebonite Dust 70/30S 3/11 255059-A/1848-55

> Ebonite dust 70/30S 3/11 255060-A/1849-55

> Ebonite dust 70/30S 3/11 255061-A/1S50-55

> Ebonite dust 70/30S 3/11 255062-A/1851-55

> Hard rubber dust 70/30S 3/11 255063-A/1852-55

> Hard rubber dust 70/30S 2/10 256122-A/2611-55

> Hard rubber dust 70/30S 2/10 256123-A/2612-55

> Hard rubber dust 70/30S 3/11 256403-A/2655-55

> Ebonite dust No. 3 2/3 256404 — A/2656-55

> Ebonite dust 70/30S 3/11

> Ebonite dust 70/30S 2/10 266405-A/2657-55

> Ebonite dust 70/30S 2/10 256672-A/2783-55
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10163 Conference Calendar

LEWIS RAY YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus D.L. “SONNY” KEESEE, Sheriff, Lubbock County Jail; KAREN SCREWBY, Deputy, Lubbock County Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:95-CV-128-C

- - - - - - - - - - August 21, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lewis Young has appealed the dismissal of his action under the Texas Tort Claims Act, based on allegations that he was chemically injured when he was an inmate of the Lubbock County Jail.No. 96-10163 - 2 - This court has previously affirmed the dismissal of Young’s civil rights action, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, based on the same facts. Young v. Keesee , No. 94-11039 (5th Cir. March 22, 1995) (unpublished). Therefore, this appeal is frivolous as a matter of law. See Pittman v. Moore , 980 F.2d 994 (5th Cir. 1993). Young’s motion for leave to supplement the record also lacks merit, because his exhibits are not relevant to this issue. We caution Young that the filing of any further frivolous appeals will invite the imposition of the full range of sanctions, up to and including the requirement of securing prior approval of the court for any future legal filing. Young is cautioned to review any pending appeal he may have to ensure that no argument or contention is raised which is frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5891]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Notice To Rescind a Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS): State Route 357 From Existing State Route 357 
West of the Tri-Cities Airport to the U.S. 11E/19E U.S. 19E 
Intersection Near Bluff City, Sullivan County, TN

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is issuing this 
notice to advise the public that the Notice of Intent published on 
December 7, 2005 to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for 
the proposed extension of State Route 357 in Sullivan County, 
Tennessee, is being rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karen M. Brunelle, Planning and 
Program Management Team Leader, Federal Highway Administration--
Tennessee Division Office, 640 Grassmere Park Road, Suite 112, 
Nashville, TN 37211. 615-781-5772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Tennessee 
Department of Transportation, is rescinding the notice of intent to 
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on a proposal to 
provide an extension to State Route 357 in Sullivan County, Tennessee. 
The proposed project was to involve extending State Route 357 from 
existing State Route 357 west of the Tri-Cities Airport to the U.S. 
11E/19E-U.S. 19E intersection near Bluff City, Tennessee.
    The project was proposed to provide for existing and projected 
traffic demand on the surrounding transportation network. After nearly 
two years of public involvement, it became clear that there was not an 
urgent need for the extension to State Route 357. An extensive Context 
Sensitive Solution process with a local citizen team did not identify 
an immediate need for the extension project. The State Route 357 
Extension project is not currently included as a priority project by 
either the Kingsport Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) or the 
First Tennessee Regional Planning Organization (RPO).
    To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed 
action is identified and taken into account, comments and suggestions 
are invited from all interested parties. Comments and questions 
concerning the proposed action should be directed to the FHWA contact 
person identified above at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this proposed program.)

    Issued on: March 26, 2007.
Karen M. Brunelle,
Planning and Program Management Team Leader, Nashville, TN.
[FR Doc. E7-5891 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Balanced Series.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                             
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                               
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                    
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: May 12, 2010
September 25, 1944

No. 49729.

#### Protest 544940-G of Seaboard Foreign Trading Co.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 56 (Friday, March 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13867-13868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 17, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 
(toll-free), or 718-488-2085 (non toll-free).

[[Page 13868]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, April 17, 2007 from 9 a.m. ET to 
10 a.m. ET via a telephone conference call. Individual comments will be 
limited to 5 minutes. If you would like to have the TAP consider a 
written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write 
Audrey Y. Jenkins, TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, 
Brooklyn, NY 11201. Due to limited conference lines, notification of 
intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be 
made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. Ms. Jenkins can be reached at 1-888-912-
1227 or 718-488-2085, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E7-5288 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS (LOGO)


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800
Dallas TX 75201-2997
Telephone (214) 999 1400

Report of Independent Accountants

To ORIX Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC:

We have examined management's  assertion about ORIX Real Estate Capital Markets,
LLC's ("ORECM")  compliance with the minimum servicing  standards  identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") (except,  for commercial loan and multifamily loan
servicing,  minimum servicing standards V.4 and VI.l, which the Mortgage Bankers
Association has interpreted as inapplicable to such servicing) as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1999 included in the accompanying  management assertion.
Management is responsible for ORECM's  compliance  with those minimum  servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about ORECM's compliance with the minimum
servicing  standards  and  performing  such other  procedures  as we  considered
necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination  provides a
reasonable  basis for our  opinion.  Our  examination  does not  provide a legal
determination on ORECM's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In  our  opinion,   management's   assertion   that  ORECM   complied  with  the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
February 18, 2000