alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3323

_____________________________ S AM S TROTHER , Appellant,

v.

J ULIA M C C ALL , Coordinator, Office of Executive Clemency
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. John C. Cooper , Judge

. April 13, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
W OLF , R OBERTS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Sam Strother, pro se, Appellant.

Ra na Wallace, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 4.4

[CyPost KK]



June 30, 2000


                               Letter of Agreement

                Cancellation of loan to CyPost Corporation, U.S.





Provided that CyPost Corporation, US sells CyPost KK to Access Media
International, I, Hirofumi Watanabe, President of CyPost KK agree to cancel all
of and every part of my loan(s) with CyPost Corporation, U.S. and any and all
claims against CyPost Corporation, U.S. without any further consideration or
future claim(s) whatsoever as of July 3, 2000 Japanese time.



/s/ Hirofumi Watanabe                          /s/ [illegible]   Yamashita
------------------------------------           ---------------------------------
Hirofumi Watanabe                              Wtness



Jul. 3rd, 2000             /s/ Tokyo Japan
-----------------------------------------------------
date / place




Bureau Toranomon 802, 2-7-16 Toranomon, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
Tel: 03-3502-0201


<PAGE>

[CyPost KK]



June 30, 2000


                               Letter of Agreement

                 Transfer of Shares to CyPost Corporation, U.S.





Provided that CyPost Corporation, US sells CyPost KK to Access Media
International, I, Hirmofumi Watanabe, a member of CyPost KK management, agree to
return twenty-two (22) of my shares in CyPost KK, Stock to CyPost Corporation,
U.S. with no cost or liability to CyPost Corporation, U.S. and without any
further consideration or future claim(s) as of July 3, 2000 Japanese time.



/s/ Hirmofumi Watanabe                          /s/ [illegible]   Yamashita
------------------------------------            --------------------------------
Hirmofumi Watanabe                              witness



Jul. 3rd, 2000             /s/ Tokyo Japan
-----------------------------------------------------
date / place





Bureau Toranomon 802, 2-7-16 Toranomon, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
Tel: 03-3502-0201
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**ALESTRA, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Rolando Zubirán Shetler, the Chief Executive Officer of Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 

1. theCompany’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: December 29, 2004
DocketNo.FAA-.2.0/S-3Sf<;RegulatoryEvaluationA:-15-tut-:2--")_DirectorateIdentifier:-ADIde/tltell'ur/;hn/1/',\,pun't'Ci.\1.cll/(llllllllht·ro/l.S.rt•gister('dJll'oductstot!tetu/JI('ht'lrlll'.IIhen\'OilClrc'.Jinis!ted,did.011"lj1du/('Fil'ld\··1•111/ntt111c/1/loii/Oitcu/h·jillillIIi<'totu/s.UpdateFieldsIEstimatedCosts:ActionCostsperProduct(e.g.,aircraft,engine,propeller,appliance)(e.g.,Inspection,Work-hoursLaborPartsCostTotalCostsNumberofTotalCostreplacement)(includecost(labor+u.s.forU.S.FleetDonotincludeonconditioncostshereaccess,testing,(@$85/hparts)Registeredandclose-up)our)ProductsIpt'lIIIli!ll"p;lllI·.Theknownnumberofproductsincompliance:l\dTotalCostsofcomplianceforU.S.fleet:$0Costscoveredunderwan·anty(ifknown)$On-ConditionCosts:GActionWork-hoursLaborcostPartsCostCostperProduct(e.g.,Inspection,(includeaccess,(@$85/hour)replacement)testing,andclose-up)Inspection7Specialconsiderationsfoa·EconomicAnalysis(Usethis.fieldtoexplainanythingintheEstimatedCoststablethatwasassumedormightnotbeobvious.This.fieldcanalsobeusedtoexplainwarrantycosts):NOU.S.operators.Costisnotcalculated.ExecutiveOrder12866:CouldtheADbeconsidereda"significantregulatoryaction"?®YES*DNOIZl*Explanation:DOTRegulatoryPoliciesandProcedures:IstheADsignificant?YES*D*Explanation:RegulatoryFlexibilityAct:WilltheADhaveasignificanteconomicimpactonasubstantialnumberofsmallentities?ExplainforeitheraYesorNoanswer.GYESDNOIZlExplanation:IntrastateAviationinAlaska:ThisADcouldaffectintrastateaviationinAlaska.IsitappropriatetoincludespecificrequirementsforaircraftoperatedinAlaskawhereaviationmightbetheonlymodeoftransportation?®YES*0NOIZI*Explanation:8
#### The First National Bank of Hornellsville, *Appellant, v.*John S. Combs, *Respondent.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Macomber, J., not participating in decision.
EXHIBIT 10.5

**ALESTRA, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Patricio de la Garza, the Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the“Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 

 

1.    the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: March 31, 2003 

 

/S/    PATRICIODELA GARZA

                                                                                           

**Patricio de laGarza**

**Chief Administrative and Financial Officer**
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. Bornhoft, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the managing owner of The Frontier Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Frontier Fund.



/s/ Richard E. BornhoftRichard E. BornhoftPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund
Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier FundSeptember 24, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or any other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to The Frontier Fund and will be retained by The Frontier Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### NEW JERSEY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH CUNNINGHAM, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

April 13, 1964. Denied.

*Mr. John Francis Cannon*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Robert O. Brolcaw*for the respondent.

On petition for certification to- Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Exhibit 23.1

To the Shareholders
Coca-Cola Embonor S.A. and Subsidiaries:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Coca-Cola Embonor
S.A. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The financial
statements of Coca-Cola Embonor S.A. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001
and for each of the two years then ended were audited by Langton Clarke
Limitada, a member firm of Andersen Worldwide, who issued an unqualified opinion
in their report dated March 2, 2002, except with respect to note 39, for which
the report was dated June 4, 2002. Andersen Worldwide has ceased operating as a
member of the Securities and Exchange Commission Practice Section of the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Coca-Cola Embonor S.A. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in Chile and the regulations established by the
Chilean Superintendency of Securities and Insurance.

Accounting principles generally accepted in Chile vary in certain significant
respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America. Application of generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States of America would have affected shareholders' equity as of December 31,
2002 and the consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31,
2002, to the extent summarized in note 39 of the Notes to the consolidated
financial statements.

                                       ERNST & YOUNG LIMITADA

                                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LIMITADA

Santiago, Chile
February 28, 2003
(except with respect to Note 39, for
which the date is May 4, 2003)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 19, 2021

No. 04-20-00449-CR

Parker Ray MORGAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR7647

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to Reply to Order to Show Cause is hereby 

GRANTED. The appellant's response is due on or before January 25, 2021.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of January, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 1000 1500 2000 1000 18 12 06 00 09/25 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.11 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
Before the Second Division,

December 20, 1960

No. 64966.

#### John V. Carr & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 204812-K, etc. (Detroit).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cold drawn steel wire rods having a diameter of not less than 0.200 of 1 inch and not more than 0.733 of 1 inch, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64255, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8484 

To amend the Buy Indian Act to include the Secretary of Agriculture, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2024 

Mrs. PELTOLA (for herself and Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Buy Indian Act to include the Secretary 

of Agriculture, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BUY INDIAN ACT MODIFICATIONS. 

4 Section 23 of the Act of the Act of June 25, 1910 

5 (36 Stat. 861, chapter 431; 25 U.S.C. 47; commonly 

6 known as the ‘‘Buy Indian Act’’), is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(3)— 

8 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

9 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8484 IH

1 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

2 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(C) the Secretary of Agriculture.’’; 

5 (2) in subsection (c)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and the 

7 Department of Health and Human Services’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘, the Department of Health and 

9 Human Services, and the Department of Agri10 culture’’; and 

11 (B) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and the 

12 Indian Health Service’’ and inserting ‘‘, the In13 dian Health Service, and the Department of 

14 Agriculture’’; and 

15 (3) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘Com16 mittee on Indian Affairs’’ and all that follows 

17 through ‘‘House of Representatives’’ and inserting 

18 ‘‘Committees on Indian Affairs and Agriculture, Nu19 trition, and Forestry of the Senate and the Commit20 tees on Natural Resources and Agriculture of the 

21 House of Representatives’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Howard Lee Harrell, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 379]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered October 27, 1993, convicting him of rape in the first degree (four counts), sodomy in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and assault in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence because he lacked the intent to commit rape on both occasions. Specifically, he relies on his own testimony which established that he used crack and alcohol prior to committing each rape. We disagree. Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the finder of fact, and his determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86). We are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
No. 55322.

#### S. S. Kresge Co. *v.*United States,

protest 155732-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures composed wholly or in chief value of papier máché the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *S. S. Kresge Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 89, C. D. 1269), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
March 11, 1944

No. 49254.

Suit 4432.

#### *Brandon Corporation*v. *United States.*

C. D. 719 affirmed. C. A. D. 266.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 12, 2017

a0906

Order 

Clerk

September 12, 2017

152510

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152510

COA: 328413

Oakland CC: 2014-251776-FC

CERVANTES DIAN CARSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

By order of June 28, 2016, the application for leave to appeal the September 11, 

2015 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People 

v Comer (Docket No. 152713). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

June 23, 2017, 500 Mich ___ (2017), the application is again considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
No. 55331.

#### Fownes Bros. & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 138820-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K
of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-68576, 333-68578, 333-68580 333-108210 and 333-109079) of our
report, dated February 27, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.


/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, PC


Winchester, Virginia
March 8, 2006
Before the First Division,

July 5, 1940

No. 44082.

#### Protest 17577-K of A. Cohen Sons Corp. (New York.)

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It appeared from stipulation of counsel that duty was-assessed on the total appraised value rather than at the appraised value of the repairs to said bottles for the reason that the replacement of the broken stoppers of the bottles with new stoppers was not considered by the customs officials to be a repair under the definition of the word “repairs” in article 408 (1), Customs Regulations of 1937. It was held that the replacement of the stoppers in these bottles, essential and integral parts of the bottles, constitutes a repair and that the collector erred in taking duty on the total value of the importation. The collector was therefore directed to reliquidate accordingly.
Before the First Division,

March 1, 1944

No. 49233.

#### Protests 981832-G, etc., of H. P. Lambert Co., Inc., et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was assessed and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5 (chemical compounds). The protests were sustained to this extent.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8432 

To codify Executive Order 13809, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2024 

Mr. GOOD of Virginia (for himself, Mr. HARRIS, and Mr. MOORE of Alabama) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To codify Executive Order 13809, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Our Police 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CODIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 13809. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Executive Order 13809 (82 Fed. 

8 Reg. 41499; restoring State, Tribal, and local law enforce9 ment’s access to life-saving equipment and resources), as 

10 in effect on August 28, 2017, shall have the force and 

11 effect of law, without modification, unless modified or auVerDate Sep 11 2014 17:57 Jun 22, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8432.IH H8432

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8432 IH

1 thorized to be modified after the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act by a subsequent Act of Congress. 

3 (b) LIMITATION ON SUBSEQUENT EXECUTIVE OR4 DERS.—In accordance with subsection (a), the President 

5 may not reinstate the Executive Order revoked by Execu6 tive Order 13809 or establish any substantially similar 

7 Executive Order. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration 

Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 31, 2007, Penick Corporation, 33 Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Poppy Straw Concentrate (9670), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II: 

The company plans on manufacturing Poppy Straw Concentrate for internal use and on manufacturing other bulk controlled substance intermediates for sale to their customers. 

Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). 

Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, Washington, DC 20537; or any being sent via express mail should be sent to DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be filed no later than May 22, 2007. 

Dated: March 19, 2007. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

 [FR Doc. E7-5400 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P