alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
February 23, 1978

#### Pounder v Harper Woods Board of Education.

(Docket No. 59366.)

*Fieger, Golden & Cousens*for plaintiffappellee. *LaBarge, Zatkoff & Dinning, P.C.,*for defendant-appellant.

Rehearing denied.

Reported at 402 Mich 91.
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Soon Do Kwon, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Mirae Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report anychange in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The company’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 30, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Pilot Therapeutics
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Floyd H. Chilton III, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Floyd H. Chilton III, Ph.D.Floyd H. Chilton III, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 31, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

This certificate is being submitted in accordance with the procedure provided
in Section III of SEC Release No. 33-8212, 34-47551, IC-25967 (March 21, 2003)
for treatment as a document accompanying the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB to
which it is attached and not as a document filed as a part of such Annual
Report. This certificate shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into
any of the Companys Securities Act registration statements.
#### In the Matter of Toomey to Review, etc., and Twelve Other Cases.

— Order making contractor a party granted.
#### Miles B. Riggs, *as Administrator, etc.,*Respondent, *v.*The *American*Tract Society, *Appellant.*

— New trial denied, and judgment ordered for the plaintiff on the verdict. Opinion by Smith, P. J.
#### DENNIS NUGENT, BY HIS GUARDIAN *AD LITEM,*ROBERT NUGENT, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MARY GINGERELLI, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

*Messrs. Fox, Schackner, Neagle & Mastrangelo*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Holley & Kroner*for the respondents.

May 2, 1967.

Denied.
No. 64971.

#### Booth Fisheries Corporation *v.*United States,

protests 58/25564 and 59/8864 (Detroit).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Amity Insurance Company, *Respondent, v.*The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, *Appellant.*Star Fire Insurance Company, *Respondent, v.*The Same. Lamar Insurance Company, *Respondent, v.*The Same. Tradesmen’s Fire Insurance Company, *Respondent,*v. The Same. New York Produce Exchange Insurance Company, *Respondent, v.*The Same. Edward Merritt, *Respondent, v.*The Same.

— Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, in one case.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000675

20-JAN-2017

08:47 AM
No. 49266.

#### Protest 102049-K of Shanghai Gardens (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was assessed and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5 (chemical compounds).- The protest was sustained to this extent.
#### ANTHONY BATTIFARANO, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF ALPINE, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

*Mr. William A. Fasolo*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Schneider,*Schneider, Behr, *Rosner & Carlton*for the respondents.

March 26, 1968.

Denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4353

_____________________________
R OBERT D ELONEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for D uval County

. Waddell A. Wallace , Judge

. December 12, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_ ____________________________2 Robert Deloney, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
261SOUTH 261 NORTH

N

Mt. Holly Bake Furnace Layout 

Schematic

261G

ID# 53001

BAKE

OVEN

ALUMINA SCRUBBING

MEDIA

FUMES FUMES

FLUID COKE

GREEN ANODES

NATURAL GAS

OR PROPANE
#### Frederick Achenbach, *Respondent, v.*The Order of Germania, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

—- Interlocutory judgment overruling defendant’s demurrer affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Pratt, J.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v LARRY J. McMULLEN, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

21 USCMA 465, 45 CMR 239

No. 25,356

June 23, 1972

*Lieutenant Thomas M. Geisler, Jr.,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Michael F. Fasanaro, Jr.,*JAGC, USN, and *Captain John P. Proctor,*USMCR, were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Chief Judge:

A special court-martial convicted the accused of two violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Ar-tide 91, 10 USC § 891. We are concerned only with one of these, the *466specification of which alleges that the accused disobeyed an order “to get a haircut.”

At the trial, it appeared that the accused in fact had his hair cut, but that this was not in accord with pertinent regulations. In his findings, the military judge modified the specification in question by inserting the word “regulation,” causing it to charge disobedience of an order “to get a *regulation*haircut.” (Emphasis supplied.)

When acting as a fact finder, a military judge may amend a specification by exceptions and substitutions. He may not, however, change the nature of the offense charged by addition of new matter. United States v Hopf, 1 USCMA 584, 5 CMR 12 (1952). In the instant case, this principle was transgressed.

The findings of guilty of specification 8 of the Charge are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The Court of Military Review may reassess the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty.

Judges Quinn and Duncan concur.
#### In the Matter of John C. Baker et al., Respondents, v Elmer W. Edwards III et al., Appellants.

[634 NYS2d 383]

—Appeal by Elmer W. Edwards III, the Incorporated Village of Bering Harbor, and the Architectural Review Board of the Incorporated Village of Bering Harbor from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Prudenti, J.), entered July 18, 1994.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Prudenti at the Supreme Court. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
# C_2008151EN.01003502.xml

| 17.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/35

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (Recast)

COM(2007) 737 final — 2007/0257 (COD)

(2008/C 151/11)

On 18 December 2007 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 80 (2)of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (recast)

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (recast)

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 441st plenary session of 16 and 17 January 2008 (meeting of 16 January) by 131 votes and 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

st

Brussels, 16 January 2008.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---
**Exhibit
31**
   **CERTIFICATION**
   
  I, George
A. Cretecos, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this Annual Report in Form 10-KSB of Nathaniel Energy
      Corporation;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 
 4.  The
issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15-(e)) for the issuer and have:
 
 a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the issuer, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s
internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 
 b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 Date:
      May 2, 2005
    /s/
      George A. Cretecos
      George
      A. Cretecos
      Chief
      Operating Officer
      (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal
      Accounting
      Officer)
PUBLIC LAW 107–367—DEC. 19, 2002 116 STAT. 3033

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4638 (S. 1999):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107–633 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 107–268 accompanying S. 1999 (Comm. on Energy and

Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

Sept. 24, considered and passed House.

Nov. 19, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–367

107th Congress

An Act

To reauthorize the Mni Wiconi Rural Water Supply Project.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MNI WICONI RURAL WATER SUPPLY PROJECT, SOUTH

DAKOTA.

Section 10(a) of the Mni Wiconi Project Act of 1988 (Public

Law 100–516; 102 Stat. 2571), as amended by section 813 of the

Mni Wiconi Act Amendments of 1994 (Public Law 103–434; 108

Stat. 4545), is amended—

(1) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘(based on October 1, 1992, price levels) and $58,800,000 (based on October 1,

1997, price levels)’’ after ‘‘$263,241,000’’;

(2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting

‘‘2008’’; and

(3) in the last sentence, by inserting ‘‘(with respect to the $263,241,000), and October 1, 1997 (with respect to the

$58,800,000)’’ after ‘‘1992’’.

Approved December 19, 2002.

Dec. 19, 2002

[H.R. 4638]
#### Morris A. Myers and others, *Respondents, v.*Michael B. Sherman, *Appellant.*

— Order affirmed, with' ten dollars costs and disbursements.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8541 

To amend the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act to provide for 

criminal penalties for acquiring a wild free-roaming horse or burro with 

the intention of transferring such animal for processing into commercial 

products, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Mrs. LUNA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act 

to provide for criminal penalties for acquiring a wild 

free-roaming horse or burro with the intention of transferring such animal for processing into commercial products, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wild Horse Integrity 

5 and Slaughter Prevention Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8541 IH

1 SEC. 2. TIME PERIOD BEFORE TITLE GRANTED; CRIMINAL 

2 PENALTY. 

3 The Act of December 15, 1971 (16 U.S.C. 1331, et 

4 seq.; commonly known as the ‘‘Wild Free-Roaming Horses 

5 and Burros Act’’) is amended as follows: 

6 (1) In section 3(c) (16 U.S.C. 1333(c))— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘period of one year’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘period of 6 months’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘one-year period’’ and in10 serting ‘‘6-month period’’. 

11 (2) In section 8 (16 U.S.C. 1338)— 

12 (A) by striking ‘‘Any person who’’ and in13 serting ‘‘(a) Any person who’’; 

14 (B) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘except 

15 as provided in section 3(e),’’; 

16 (C) by redesignating paragraph (6) as 

17 paragraph (8); 

18 (D) by inserting after paragraph (5), the 

19 following: 

20 ‘‘(6) acquires a wild free-roaming horse or 

21 burro, or the remains thereof, with the intention of 

22 transferring such animal, or the remains thereof, di23 rectly or indirectly, for processing into commercial 

24 products, or 

25 ‘‘(7) knowingly transfers an acquired wild free26 roaming horse or burro, or the remains thereof, diVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:55 Jul 10, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8541.IH H8541

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8541 IH

1 rectly or indirectly, for processing commercial prod2 ucts, or’’; 

3 (E) in the matter following paragraph (8), 

4 as so redesignated, by striking ‘‘be subject to’’ 

5 and all that follows through ‘‘United States 

6 Code’’ and inserting ‘‘have committed a felony 

7 offense punishable by a fine of not more than 

8 $2,000, imprisonment for a term exceeding one 

9 year, or both’’; and 

10 (F) by amending subsection (b) to read as 

11 follows: 

12 ‘‘(b) The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary 

13 of Agriculture, and their respective employees, shall have 

14 power to investigate possible violations of the offenses list15 ed in subsection (a). A finding of non-compliance shall be 

16 referred to the Attorney General (or one of the U.S. Attor17 ney’s offices serving under the Attorney General) for pros18 ecution.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
##### 



MSW ENERGY HOLDINGS II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Unaudited, in thousands of dollars)
 For the Nine
    
    
    For the Period From
    
    
    
    For the Period FromMonths Ended
    
    
    June 25 through
    
    
    
    January 1 throughSeptember 30, 2006
    
    
    September 30, 2005
    
    
    
    June 24, 2005EARNINGS:Pre-tax income (loss) from
continuing operations before
minority interests
    
    $
    65,202
    
    
    $
    35,136
    
    
    
    $
    (1,691
    )Add:Fixed charges
    
    
    42,648
    
    
    
    17,080
    
    
    
    
    30,358Earnings, as adjusted
    
    $
    107,850
    
    
    $
    52,216
    
    
    
    $
    28,667FIXED CHARGES:Interest expense
    
    $
    42,648
    
    
    $
    17,080
    
    
    
    $
    30,358Fixed charges
    
    $
    42,648
    
    
    $
    17,080
    
    
    
    $
    30,358RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES:
    
    
    2.53x
    
    
    
    3.06x
    
    
    
    
    0.94x
 43
RANDY NEUGEBAUER 19TH DiSTRICT, TEXAS
R001.r 1424 la.tGwORTH House OFFICE BurLD!IIG

WASH<tiGTal, DC 20515·4319**PHOr~e:** (202) 225·4005 FAX: (202) 225-9615 www.randy.house.gov randy@mall.house.gov

## ~ongrt!i!i 

# of tbt llnittb**~tatts ~oust**  

## of l\epresentatibes

Ms. Aloha Ley Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Analysis 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE W86-310 Washington, DC 20590
DearMs. Ley: June 7, 2012

I am pleased to recommend the City ofAbilene for funding through the Department of Transportation Office ofAviation Analysis.
With funding from the Small Community Air Service Development Grant, the Abilene Regional Airpmtwill be able to increase customer choices by adding non-stop service from Abilene to an additional airline hub airport, increase route oppmtunities and capacity, reduce average fares paid by passengers using Abilene, and reduce leakage to other airports inthe region.
I support the Abilene Regional Airport request for funding and ask that all due considerationbe given to this wise investmentopportunity. Sincerely,

# ~ Randy Neugebauer

RN/sl 611 UmveRsrrv Aver-tue Su11e220 LUBBOCl<, TX 79401

(806) 763-1611 1510ScUAAYSTREET SuneB BlG SPR.IIG, TX 79720

(432) 264..()722 SOOCHEimm

Surre819 ABlLEIIE, TX 79602

(325) 675·9779
June 23, 1938

No. 38921.

#### Protest 857949-G of F. H. Von Damm.

Abstract 38694. Application by plaintiff for rehearing granted.
Exhibit 32


                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial  officer of First South Bancorp,  Inc., each hereby certifies that, to
the best of his knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-K of the registrant fully
complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934,  and that the  information  contained in the report fairly
presents,  in all  material  aspects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.


March 26, 2008
                                            s/Barry L. Slider
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Barry L. Slider
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                            s/V. Lewis Shuler
                                            ---------------------------
                                            V. Lewis Shuler
                                            Chief Financial Officer