alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<HTML>
<HEAD><TITLE>Help Using CSV Files - United States and Canadian Hogs</title></head>
<BODY bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+3"><b>Help Using CSV Files</b></font size>
<P>
<font size="+2"><b>United States and Canadian Hogs</b></font size>  -  Released March 6, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).<br>
<P>
<P>
You have downloaded "comma-separated value" (CSV) files which contain delimited-record representations of the tables in the report referenced above.  These CSV files can be imported into spreadsheets, or can be processed easily by other types of software.
<P>
The file<b> usch_index.htm</b> is among the files you have downloaded.  It contains table descriptions and file names for the CSV files.
<P>
Each line in a given CSV file represents one line in the published table (exception: there is a separate line for each footnote, regardless of how the footnotes are presented in the published table).
<P>
The first two values on the line are not part of the table.  The first value is a table number.  The second value is a line "type", as follows:
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE>
       t = title line<BR>
       h = column heading line<BR>
       u = units definition line<BR>
       d = data line<BR>
       c = the horizontal "closing" line (___) at the bottom of the table<BR>
       f = footnote
</blockquote>
<P>
<b>Examples:</b>
<P>
  <b>Title Line</b><br>
  195,"t","Crop Summary:  Area Planted and Harvested, United States, 2000-2001"<br>
<P>
  <b>Column Heading Lines</b><br>
  195,"h","","Area Planted","Area Planted","Area Harvested","Area Harvested"<br>
  195,"h","Crop","","","",""<br>
  195,"h","","2000","2001","2000","2001"<br>
  195,"h","","","","",""<br>
<P>
  <b>Units Definition Line</b><br>
  195,"u","","1,000 Acres","1,000 Acres","1,000 Acres","1,000 Acres"<br>
<P>
  <b>Data Lines</b><br>
  195,"d","","","","",""<br>
  195,"d","Grains & Hay","","","",""<br>
  195,"d","  Corn for Grain 2/","79545.0","","72732.0",""<br>
<P>
  <b>Closing Line</b><br>
  195,"c",""<br>
<P>
  <b>Footnote</b><br>
  195,"f","2/ Area planted for all purposes."
</body>
</html>
No. 41846.

#### Protests 839854-G, etc., of Wm. J. Jones & Co. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Myers*v. *United States*(T. D. 49530) it was held that duty should have been taken under the provisions of section 601 (c) (6) on the basis of the actual board measurement of lumber in the condition in which imported.
1-900 JACKPOT, INC. (FORMERLY PULTRONEX CORPORATION)
                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph  Batty,  solely for the purpose of  complying  with 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
hereby  certify  that to my  knowledge  Annual  Report  of 1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.
(formerly  Pultronex  Corporation)  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31,
2004 ("Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such
Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of 1-900 Jackpot, Inc. (formerly Pultronex Corporation).



DATE:  NOVEMBER 22, 2005

/S/ JOSEPH BATTY
------------------------
    JOSEPH BATTY
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 157 (Friday, August 14, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 48686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20045]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 1

Definitions and Abbreviations

CFR Correction

    In Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 59, 
revised as of January 1, 2015, on pages 12 and 13, in Sec.  1.1, the 
definitions beginning with VA and ending with VS 
are removed.

[FR Doc. 2015-20045 Filed 8-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
#### John H. Bonn, Plaintiff, *v.*Ernest Steiger, *Defendant.*

— Motion granted.
#### Alphonso Stone, *Appellant, v.*James C. Jones, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Eileen Dolgener v. Steven Dolgener

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 490

- CV

Trial court case number: 2008

- 49 7 30

Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Eileen Dolgener , has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s June 2,

2017 order in a suit to modify the parent

- child relationship

. And, w e abated the appeal pending resolution of modification proceedings in the trial court

. Appellant has filed a motion, requesting that William M. Thursland be allowed to withdraw as her counsel and

Kat y Gardner be substituted as counsel on appeal. We reinstate the appeal on t he

Court’s active docket and grant the motion

.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to note William Thursland ’s withdrawal as counsel for appellant and substitute Kat y Gardner as counsel for appellant on the docket

of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ February 26, 2019

___
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Distributed Energy
Systems Corp. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1). | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2). | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: August 5, 2005 |  | /s/    WALTER W. SCHROEDER   
|                      |  | Walter W. Schroeder          
|                      |  | President                    
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)



|                      |  |                                             
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 5, 2005 |  | /s/    JOHN A. GLIDDEN                      
|                      |  | John A. Glidden                             
|                      |  | Vice President of Finance                   
|                      |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is accompanying the
Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2005, (the “Report”) of UTEK Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Clifford M. Gross, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, herebycertify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theRegistrant.
__________________________________ C This decision is rendered by a quorum due to the retirement of then-Chief Judge Hatchett on May 14, 1999. See , 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 95-6960

________________________ D. C. Docket No. CR-95-AR-91-S UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus ROY MACK WEST, a.k.a. Teeny Man, etc., Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________ (January 26, 2000) ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before GODBOLD and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judges. * PER CURIAM:2 This case comes before us by order of the United States Supreme Court, which has vacated the judgment of this Court as to appellant Roy Mack West, and remanded the case for our reconsideration in light of Richardson v. United States , 119 S.Ct. 1707(1999). See United States v. West, 142 F.3d 1408 (11th Cir. 1998), vacated and remanded, 119 S.Ct. 2042 (1999). In Richardson, the Supreme Court held that “a jury in a federal criminal case brought under [ 21 U.S.C.] § 848 must unanimously agree not only that the defendant committed some ‘continuing series of violations’ but also that the defendant committed each of the in dividual ‘violations’ necessary to make up that ‘continuing series.’” 119 S.Ct. at 1709. West was convicted of both conducti ng a continuing criminal enterprise (“CCE”)(Count 1) and being a member of the underlying drug conspiracy (Count 2). At sentencing, the court vacated Count 2 as a lesser included offense of the CCE conviction. See United States v. Nixon , 918 F.2d 895, 908 (11th Cir. 1990) (when defendant convicted on both a CCE count and a conspiracy county, the Court will merge the two offenses by vacating the c onviction of the lesser included conspiracy count). The government concedes that th e jury instruction given was not in accord with the requirements of Richardson and that West’s conviction on the CCE count cannot stand, see also United States v. Riley , No. 96-4653 (11th3 Cir.1999)(unpublished), and requests that this Court remand to the district court with instructions to reinstate the vacated drug conspiracy count and resentence West. Accordingly, we vacate West’s convicti on for engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise. Since the conspiracy conviction under Count 2 was vacated only because it was a lesser included offense of the CCE conviction, and the CCE conviction no longer stands, we remand this case to the district court with instructions to reinstate West’s conspiracy conviction unde r Count 2 and resentence him. VACATED AND REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE FISCAL  YEAR ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  2000,  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         137,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,321,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,484,367
<PP&E>                                          75,343
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,948
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,888,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,672,237
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,062
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,164,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,888,820
<SALES>                                         62,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,500
<CGS>                                           60,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               591,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (570,762)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,005
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (541,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (541,757)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.019)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.027)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8641 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.8641

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 401 Main Street in Brawley, California, as the ``Walter Francis Ulloa 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WALTER FRANCIS ULLOA MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 401 Main Street in Brawley, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Walter Francis Ulloa Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Walter 
Francis Ulloa Memorial Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### 425 th 

### Judicial District Court
Third Administrative Judicial Region

405 Martin Luther King Blvd

Post Office Box 22 Georgetown, Texas 78626

(512) 9 43 -3381 • Fax (5 12 ) 943- 3383

Betsy F. Lambeth Lynette Thorpe Billy Ray Stubblefield District Judge Court Reporter Regional Presiding Judge

January 3, 2017

Attn: Jeffrey D. Kyle Third Court of Appeals

PO Box 12547
Austin, Texas 78711-2547

Re: Third Court of Appeals Number: 03-16- 00 870

- CV

Trial Court Case Number : 1 6-1096-C 42 5 Style: Peter C. Hillbrand v. All Web Leads

To Whom It May Concern:

I have received a letter requesting the above-mentioned transcript but have not received payment for such. This letter is to give notice to the Third Court that I have not begun work on appeal because I have not received paymen t and/or payment arrangements have not been made.

Thank you so much for your assistance. If you have any questions, please do

not hesitate to call or write.

Sincerely,

Lynette Thorpe, CSR Court Reporter

425 th District Court
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Craig D. Abolt, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MSW Energy Holdings LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 3, 2006         By:             /s/ Craig D. Abolt    Craig D. Abolt    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
46
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 20683 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t if f- A pp el l ee v. E D W IN M A U R IC IO E RA Z O -V IL LA T O R O , a ls o k n o w n a s E d w i n M o u r ic io E razo, al so kn ow n as E dw i n E razo V i l l ator o, al so kn ow n as E dw i n M . E razo, al so kn ow nas E d w inM E ra z o -V illa to ro , a lso k n o w n a s H a u ricio E ra so -V illa t oro, al so kn ow n as E dw i n M au ri ci o E razi o, al so kn ow n as M au ri ci o E raso- V i l l ator o, al so kn ow n as E dw i n E razo- V i l l ator o, a lso k n ow n as Jua n L u i s G arci a, al so kn ow n as E dw i n M au ri ci o E razo D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he Sout her n D i st r i c tof Texas U SDC N o . 4 : 0 8 - CR- 3 1 9 - ALL B ef ore JO N E S , C h i ef

Ju dg e, an d JO L LYan d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * A pp e a l i n g t h e j u dg m en ti n a cr i m i n alcase, E dw i n M au ri ci o E razoV i l l at or o pr es ent s ar gum ent s t hathe c onc ede s ar e f or ec l os ed by Un i t ed S t ate s v. Cepeda - R i os , 530 F . 3d333 , 335 - 36 (5t h C i r. 200 8) , w h i ch hel d th at even aft er United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D April30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 20683

2 L opez v. G on zales , 5 4 9 U .S . 4 7 (2 0 0 6 ) , a s e c o n ds ta te co n v ic tio n fo rs im p le pos se ssion o f a c ont r oll ed s ubst ancequal if i es as an aggr avat ed f el ony that s u p p o r t s t h e i mp o s i t i o n o f a n e i g h t - l e v e le n h a n c e me n tu n d e rU. S . S . G. § 2 L 1 . 2 (b ) ( 1 ) ( C) . T h e a p p e l l a n t ’ s mo t i o n f o rs u mm a r yd i s p o s i t i o n i s GRANT ED , a n dt h e j u d g me n to f t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 30, 2014

h1215

Order 

Clerk

December 30, 2014

147080

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147080

COA: 314042

Oakland CC: 96-145767-FC

JAMES YOUNG STURDIVANT,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of February 5, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 

2013 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in People 

v Carp (Docket No. 146478), People v Davis (Docket No. 146819) and People v Eliason

(Docket No. 147428). On order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 8, 

2014, 496 Mich 440 (2014), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, 

because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018 (the “Report”) of Oxford Square Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Jonathan H. Cohen   | 
|----------------------- | 
|Name: Jonathan H. Cohen | 
|Date: August 1, 2018    |