Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 13689 

List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1615 

Clothing, Consumer protection, 

Flammable materials, Infants and 

children, Labeling, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sleepwear, 

Textiles, Warranties. 

■ Accordingly, 16 CFR part 1615 is 

corrected by making the following 

correcting amendments: 

PART 1615—STANDARD FOR THE 

FLAMMABILITY OF CHILDREN’S 

SLEEPWEAR: SIZES 0 THROUGH 6X 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 1615 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Sec. 4, 67 Stat. 112, as 

amended, 81 Stat. 569–570; 15 U.S.C. 1193. 

§ 1615.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. In § 1615.1: 

■ A. In paragraph (c)(3) add the word 

‘‘of’’ between the words ‘‘Flammability’’

and ‘‘Clothing’’ and add the word ‘‘of’’

between the words ‘‘Flammability’’ and 

‘‘Vinyl’’; 

■ B. In Diagram 1, in the block 

underneath ‘‘5′′ remove ‘‘9.5 cm 31⁄4’’′′ 

and add, in their place ‘‘9.5 cm 33⁄4’’′′. 

§ 1615.4 [Amended] 

■ 3. In § 1615.4: 

■ A. In paragraph (b)(1) remove the 

word ‘‘plain’’ and add in its place 

‘‘plan’’. 

■ B. In the last sentence in paragraph 

(d)(3)(i)(A) remove the word ‘‘of’’ and 

add in its place ‘‘or’’. 

Dated: March 19, 2007. 

Todd Stevenson, 

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–5303 Filed 3–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

19 CFR Part 210 

Adjudication and Enforcement 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. International Trade 

Commission is adopting as a final rule 

the proposed rulemaking that revised 

certain provisions of the agency’s rules 

for investigations and related 

proceedings under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) to 

provide for services of certain 

Commission documents by overnight 

delivery and provide one additional day 

to respond to Commission documents 

served by overnight delivery. These 

rules will ensure effective service of 

Commission documents on private 

parties in section 337 investigations and 

related proceedings. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 23, 2007. 

Applicability Date: The Commission 

will adopt procedures to implement the 

rules changes on April 2, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint A. Gerdine, Esq., telephone 202–

708–2310, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on the final rulemaking 

can be obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

December 8, 2006 (71 FR 71113), the 

Commission published a proposed 

rulemaking that would revise the text of 

§ 210.6 by dividing the current text and 

designating the portions as paragraphs 

(a) and (b), adding a new paragraph (c), 

which provides that a party shall be 

given one additional day to respond to 

a Commission document when served 

by overnight delivery, and adding 

another new paragraph (d), which 

defines ‘‘overnight delivery’’; and 

amending the text of § 210.7 by revising 

and redesignating paragraph 210.7(a) as 

paragraph (a)(1) and adding new 

paragraph (a)(2). 

The sixty day public comment period 

for the proposed rulemaking closed on 

February 6, 2007. The Commission 

received one set of comments, from the 

ITC Trial Lawyers Association 

(ITCTLA), in response to the proposed 

rulemaking. The Commission has 

considered the ITCTLA comments to 

expand the scope of documents to be 

served by overnight delivery to include 

additional categories of documents. The 

Commission’s response to these 

comments is that the Commission will 

consider whether to expand its 

procedures to include other types of 

documents after it has gained 

experience with the new service 

procedures. Thus, the Commission is 

adopting the proposed rule as a final 

rule without any changes. 

Regulatory Analysis 

The Commission has determined that 

the final rules do not meet the criteria 

described in Section 3(f) of Executive 

Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993) 

and thus do not constitute a significant 

regulatory action for purposes of the 

Executive Order. 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is inapplicable to this 

rulemaking because it is not one for 

which a notice of rulemaking is required 

under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any other 

statute. Although the Commission has 

chosen to publish a notice of final 

rulemaking, these proposed regulations 

are ‘‘agency rules of procedure and 

practice,’’ and thus are exempt from the 

notice requirement imposed by 5 U.S.C. 

553(b). 

These final rules do not contain 

federalism implications warranting the 

preparation of a federalism summary 

impact statement pursuant to Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 4, 

1999). 

No actions are necessary under the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) because the final 

rules will not result in the expenditure 

by State, local, and tribal governments, 

in the aggregate, or by the private sector, 

of $100,000,000 or more in any one 

year, and will not significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments. 

The final rules are not major rules as 

defined by section 804 of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et 

seq.). Moreover, they are exempt from 

the reporting requirements of the 

Contract With America Advancement 

Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121) because 

they concern rules of agency 

organization, procedure, or practice that 

do not substantially affect the rights or 

obligations of non-agency parties. 

The amendments are not subject to 

section 3504(h) of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), 

since they do not contain any new 

information collection requirements. 

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 210 

Administration practice and 

procedure, Business and industry, 

Customs duties and inspection, Imports, 

and Investigations. 

■ For the reasons discussed in the 

supplementary information, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

amends 19 CFR part 210 as follows: 

PART 210—ADJUDICATION AND 

ENFORCEMENT 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 210 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1333, 1335, and 1337. 

■ 2. Revise § 210.6 to read as follows: 

§ 210.6 Computation of time, additional 

hearings, postponements, continuances, 

and extensions of time. 

(a) Unless the Commission, the 

administrative law judge, or this or 

another section of this part specifically 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
13690 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

provides otherwise, the computation of 

time and the granting of additional 

hearings, postponements, continuances, 

and extensions of time shall be in 

accordance with §§ 210.14 and 

210.16(d) of this chapter. 

(b) Whenever a party has the right or 

is required to perform some act or to 

take some action within a prescribed 

period after service of a document upon 

it, and the document was served by 

mail, the deadline shall be computed by 

adding to the end of the prescribed 

period the additional time allotted 

under § 210.16(d), unless the 

Commission, the administrative law 

judge, or another section of this part 

specifically provides otherwise. 

(c) Whenever a party has the right or 

is required to perform some act or to 

take some action within a prescribed 

period after service of a Commission 

document upon it, and the document 

was served by overnight delivery, the 

deadline shall be computed by adding 

one day to the end of the prescribed 

period, unless the Commission, the 

administrative law judge, or another 

section of this part specifically provides 

otherwise. 

(d) ‘‘Overnight delivery’’ is defined as 

delivery by the next business day. 

■ 3. Amend § 210.7 by revising 

paragraph (a) to read as follows: 

§ 210.7 Service of process and other 

documents; publication of notices. 

(a) Manner of service. (1) The service 

of process and all documents issued by 

or on behalf of the Commission or the 

administrative law judge—and the 

service of all documents issued by 

parties under §§ 210.27 through 210.34 

of this part—shall be in accordance with 

§ 201.16 of this chapter, unless the 

Commission, the administrative law 

judge, or this or another section of this 

part specifically provides otherwise. 

(2) The service of all initial 

determinations as defined in § 210.42 

and all documents containing 

confidential business information—

issued by or on behalf of the 

Commission or the administrative law 

judge—on a private party shall be 

effected by serving a copy of the 

document by overnight delivery—as 

defined in § 210.6(d)—on the person to 

be served, on a member of the 

partnership to be served, on the 

president, secretary, other executive 

officer, or member of the board of 

directors of the corporation, association, 

or other organization to be served, or, if 

an attorney represents any of the above 

before the Commission, by serving a 

copy by overnight delivery on such 

attorney. 

* * * * * 

Issued: March 15, 2007. 

By Order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–5177 Filed 3–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 

Bureau 

27 CFR Part 9 

[T.D. TTB–60; Re: Notice No. 58] 

RIN: 1513–AB18 

Green Valley of Russian River Valley 

Viticultural Area (2005R–412P) 

AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 

Trade Bureau, Treasury. 

ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision. 

SUMMARY: This Treasury decision 

renames the ‘‘Sonoma County Green 

Valley’’ viticultural area in northern 

California as the ‘‘Green Valley of 

Russian River Valley’’ viticultural area. 

This decision does not affect the 

location, size, or boundary of the 

viticultural area. We designate 

viticultural areas to allow vintners to 

better describe the origin of their wines 

and to allow consumers to better 

identify wines they may purchase. 

DATES: Effective Dates: This final rule is 

effective on April 23, 2007. Wine 

bottlers may continue to use approved 

labels bearing the former viticultural 

area name until April 23, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: N. 

A. Sutton, Regulations and Rulings 

Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 

Trade Bureau, 925 Lakeville St., No. 

158, Petaluma, California 94952; 

telephone 415–271–1254. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background on Viticultural Areas 

TTB Authority 

Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol 

Administration Act (the FAA Act, 27 

U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol 

beverage labels provide consumers with 

adequate information regarding product 

identity and prohibits the use of 

misleading information on those labels. 

The FAA Act also authorizes the 

Secretary of the Treasury to issue 

regulations to carry out its provisions. 

The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 

Trade Bureau (TTB) administers these 

regulations. 

Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 

part 4) allows the establishment of 

definitive viticultural areas and the use 

of their names as appellations of origin 

on wine labels and in wine 

advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB 

regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains the 

list of approved viticultural areas. 

Definition 

Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB 

regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines 

a viticultural area for American wine as 

a delimited grape-growing region 

distinguishable by geographical 

features, the boundaries of which have 

been recognized and defined in part 9 

of the regulations. These designations 

allow vintners and consumers to 

attribute a given quality, reputation, or 

other characteristic of a wine made from 

grapes grown in an area to its 

geographical origin. The establishment 

of viticultural areas allows vintners to 

describe more accurately the origin of 

their wines to consumers and helps 

consumers to identify wines they may 

purchase. Establishment of a viticultural 

area is neither an approval nor an 

endorsement by TTB of the wine 

produced in that area. 

Requirements 

Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB 

regulations outlines the procedure for 

proposing an American viticultural area 

and provides that any interested party 

may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as a viticultural area. 

Petitioners may use the same procedure 

to request changes involving existing 

viticultural areas. Section 9.3(b) of the 

TTB regulations requires the petition to 

include—

• Evidence that the proposed 

viticultural area is locally and/or 

nationally known by the name specified 

in the petition; 

• Historical or current evidence that 

supports setting the boundary of the 

proposed viticultural area as the 

petition specifies; 

• Evidence relating to the 

geographical features, such as climate, 

soils, elevation, and physical features, 

that distinguish the proposed 

viticultural area from surrounding areas; 

• A description of the specific 

boundary of the proposed viticultural 

area, based on features found on United 

States Geological Survey (USGS) maps; 

and 

• A copy of the appropriate USGS 

map(s) with the proposed viticultural 

area’s boundary prominently marked. 

A petition requesting a change to an 

established viticultural area must 

include the appropriate evidence 

described above to support the 

requested change. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES