alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14610-14611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5657]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-910-5850-EU-CACA-48476]


Notice of Realty Action: Competitive Sale of Public Lands in 
Riverside County, CA; Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Realty Action; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management published a document in the 
Federal Register of March 12, 2007, concerning the sale of 51 parcels 
of public land in Riverside County, California, aggregating 
approximately 274.37 acres. The document contained (a) an inaccurate 
legal description for Parcel 33 and (b) the inadvertent omission of a 
parcel from two sentences contained in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Gey, Realty Specialist at (951) 
697-5352 or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#53273b3c3e32200c34362a1330327d313f3e7d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4d0cccbc9c5d7fbc3c1dde4c7c58ac6c8c98ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

[[Page 14611]]

Correction

    In the Federal Register of March 12, 2007, in FR Doc. E7-4420, on 
page 11051, in the first column, correct

``Parcel 33 T. 4 S., R. 7 E., sec. 4,
    S\1/2\SW\1/4\NW\1/4\SE\1/4\'' as follows
``Parcel 33 T. 4 S., R. 7 E., sec. 4,
    S\1/2\NW\1/4\SW\1/4\SE\1/4\''

and in the Federal Register of March 12, 2007, in FR Doc. E7-4420, on 
page 11051, in the second column, in the second and third sentences in 
the first paragraph, correct ``parcel 1'' as follows ``parcels 1 and 
2''.

    Dated: March 22, 2007.
John Willoughby,
Acting Deputy State Director, Natural Resources (CA-930).
[FR Doc. E7-5657 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Before the Third Division,

May 1, 1946

No. 51069.

#### Protests 27423-K, etc., of H. P. Lambert Co., Inc., et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J:

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### HOBBS v. HEAD & DOWST CO. In re HOBBS. In re NEW ENGLAND BREEDERS’ CLUB.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

March 1, 1911.)

Nos. 873, 896.

In the matter of the New England Breeders’ Club, bankrupt. Nathaniel W. Hobbs, trustee, appeals from an order denying his petition for disallowance of a mechanic’s lien claim in favor of the Head & Dowst Company. On petition for rehearing. Overruled. For former opinion, see 184 Fed. 409. Henry F. Hollis, for appellant. George H. Warren, Robert L. Manning, and Burnham. Brown, Jones *&*Warren, for appellee.

Before COLT, PUTNAM, and LOWELL, Circuit Judges.

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

These are the cases in which judgments for the. Head & Dowst Company were entered on January 3, 1911. 184 Fed. 409. This petition is entitled both in “Hobbs, Trustee, v. Head *&*Dowst Company,” and in “Nathaniel W. Hobbs, Trustee, Petitioner.” It is not necessary to notice the latter proceeding, because it was plainly dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The merits were disposed of in Hobbs, Trustee, Appellant, v. Head & Dowst Company, Appellee, and the Head & Dowst Company has now filed this petition for a rehearing. The petition for a rehearing takes notice of the fact that the involuntary petition in bankruptcy involved here was filed on, April 19, 1907, instead of April 29, 1907, as stated in our opinion, and therefore, in fact, a few days within the four months after the lien suit referred to in these proceedings was commenced. This is wholly an unimportant matter, because no question of preference arises here. The petition for a rehearing treats Roehm v. Horst, 178 U. S. 1, 20 Sup. Ct. 780, 44 L. Ed. 953, as though it were purely a superficial case relating entirely to the detailed circumstances out of which it grew. This is an absolute misapprehension, for Roehm v. Horst goes to the very bottom of a fundamental rule to such an *1007extent that, as we said in our opinion, independently 6f it, the rule which was reaffirmed by it would apply here. This rule is so fundamental as to dispose of the merits of these proceedings in any possible view that can be taken of them, or of what occurred in the courts of New Hampshire; and this in such a way that it is unnecessary to notice any other propositions now brought to onr attention. We have given full consideration to the petition for a rehearing, and the following order must be entered: Ordered, with reference to tbe petition for a rehearing filed by Nathaniel W. Hobbs, trustee, appellant, on February 3, 1911, it appears that no judge who concurred in the judgments desires that the petition be allowed, and the same is dismissed, and mandate will issue forthwith.
No. 40254.

#### Protest 953795-G of Lansdowne Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The protest was submitted without the introduction of evidence in support of the claims made. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2187

HUEY L. HAMRICK,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR;

KITT ENERGY CORPORATION,

Respondents.

On Petition of Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(00-600-BLA)

Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 21, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Huey L. Hamrick, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Jennifer U.

Toth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Richard

Phillips Johnson, Lexington, Kentucky, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Huey L. Hamrick seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s

decision and order dismissing his appeal from an Administrative Law

Judge’s decision denying his claim for black lung benefits as

untimely. We affirm.

A notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days from the

date upon which the decision or order of the ALJ was filed in the

Office of the District Director. See 20 C.F.R. § 802.205. The

ALJ’s decision and order were filed in the Office of the District

Director on July 31, 2001. Hamrick’s notice of appeal, postmarked

September 5, 2001, and received in the Office of the Clerk on September 10, 2001, is therefore untimely. See Dominion Coal Corp. v.

Honaker, 33 F.3d 401, 405 (4th Cir. 1994).

Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s order dismissing Hamrick’s

appeal as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 57 (Monday, March 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5447]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board, 
DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Air Force Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) will meet on 10 
April 2007 at Air Intelligence Agency (AIA), Lackland Air Force Base, 
TX. The purpose of the meeting is to hold the SAB Spring quarterly 
meeting. The day will be spent in classified briefings and discussion 
with Air Intelligence Agency to learn about their roles and mission. 
Visits will also be made to various tenant units also at Lackland Air 
Force Base. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended and 41 CFR 102-3.155, 
the Department of Defense has determined that the meeting shall be 
closed to the public. The Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of 
the Air Force, in consultation with the Office of the Air Force General 
Counsel, has determined in writing that the public interest requires 
that all sessions of this meeting be closed to the public because they 
will be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(1) and (9)(B) 
of Title 5 United States Code.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Colonel Kyle Gresham, 
Executive Director, Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, 1180 Air Force 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330-1040, (703) 697-4811.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-5447 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-P
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 
 
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 5, 2007, Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., Attn: Regulatory Compliance, 9115 Hague Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule I and II: Drug
ScheduleLysergic Acid Diethylamide (7315)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IAlphamethadol (9605)
IPhencyclidine (7471)
IIEcgonine (9180)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIMorphine (9300)
II
 The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances for use in diagnostic products. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, Washington, DC 20537; or any being sent via express mail should be sent to DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be filed no later than May 29, 2007. Dated: March 19, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control,  Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E7-5510 Filed 3-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### Bartholomew Feiden, *Appellant, v.*The President, etc., of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Co., Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Boardman, J.
---

Exhibit 99.1

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

March 31, 2003

Securities and
Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N.WWashington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The
certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission
solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Annual Report on
Form 10-K (the Report) accompanying this letter.

Peter
Norgeot, the President and Michael Carlson, the Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of AES Ironwood, L.L.C.,  each certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of  the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects,  the
financial  condition and results of operations of AES Ironwood, L.L.C.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/
Peter Norgeot
| | -----------------

| | By:
Peter NorgeotTitle:  President
| | ----------------------------------

| | /s/
Michael Carlson
| | -------------------

| | By:
Michael CarlsonTitle:  Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AES Ironwood,
L.L.C. and will be retained by AES Ironwood, L.L.C. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### AMBASSADOR FACTORS CORP., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. EUGENE ROSENSWEET, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Messrs. Bilder, Bilder, Silver & McCurley*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Shavick, Thevos, Stern, Schotz & Steiger*and *Mr. Barry I. Croland*for the respondent.

April 18, 1967.

Denied.
g

U.S. EPA/ Stratospheric Protection Division 

Tel. (202) 343-9624 

Email Wozniak.gerald@epa.gov 

Dear Mr. Wozniak, 

Thank you for the feedback regarding DuPont Opteon® XP40 SNAP (R-449A) submission. 

This letter is to answer the points that were raised in the November 13, 2014 Opteon® 

XP40 SNAP incompleteness letter. 

Answers to questions 1) and 2) 

DuPont confirms that we will use Opteon ® XP40 (R-449A) refrigerant in the applications 

listed in Table 1 below. As requested in question 1, DuPont has marked the applications, 

along with the possible sub-categories of applications as new (N) or retrofit ( R). 

Additionally, as requested in question 2, DuPont has provided an estimate of the typical 

charge and maximum charge size for applications noted. 

[ confidential business information] 

Wilmington, DE 19805 

Discla imer: 

The information set forth herein is furnished free of charge and based on technical data that DuPont believes to be 

reliable. It is intended for use by persons having technical skill, at their own risk. Since conditions of use are outside 

our control, DuPont make no warranties, expressed or implied and assume no liability in connection with any use of 

this information. Nothing herein is to be taken as a license to operate under, or a recommendation to infringe any 

patents or patent applications
Before the Second Division,

January 12, 1942

No. 46807.

#### Protests 32548-K, etc., of Tara Singh (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that the merchandise consists of silk scarfs and woven silk mufflers which have been hemmed. In accordance therewith the scarfs and mufflers in question were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 as claimed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Summit Financial Services Group, Inc. (the Company), for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven C. Jacobs, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven C. Jacobs                                
|Steven C. Jacobs                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    



Dated: August 15, 2005
Before the First Division,

October 10, 1950

No. 54736.

#### Chekiang Co. and Kittay & Blitz, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 158083-K (A) and 157586-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 10.4


 


Short Term Loan Contract


 


This Loan Agreement (the “Agreement”)
is an agreement between Vapir Enterprise Inc henceforth known as “Borrower,” and Hamid Emarlou henceforth known as
“Lender.”


 


Borrower wishes to borrow $ as needed, known as “Loan,”
from Lender. Loan will be furnished to Borrower on demand. This loan will be used for working capital purposes.


 


Conditions for this Short Term Loan
are as follows:


 


•This Loan bears interest
at 5% per annum.


•This Loan is payable to the
lender on demand.


 


Borrower and Lender agree to the conditions
above, and sign to that effect on the first day of Jan, 2014.


 


	/s/ HAMID EMARLOU	 
	CEO & President	 
	Borrower Signature	 
	 	 
	/s/ HAMID EMARLOU	 
	Lender Signature
Exhibit
31.3









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)







I, Marc
Kilbride, Vice President and Treasurer of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric,
LLC (successor to Reliant Energy, Incorporated), as servicer (the “servicer”),
certify that:






1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing
distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the
year covered by this annual report, of CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond
Company, LLC;




2. Based
on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period
covered by this annual report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be
provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;




4. Based
on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in the report
and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the terms of the
Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated October 24, 2001 between
CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company, LLC (successor to Reliant Energy
Transition Bond Company LLC), as Issuer, and the servicer, CenterPoint Energy
Houston Electric, LLC (successor to Reliant Energy, Incorporated) (the
“Transition Property Servicing Agreement”),  and except as disclosed
in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Transition
Property Servicing Agreement; and




5. The
reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer’s
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.







/s/
      Marc KilbrideMarc
      KilbrideVice
      President and Treasurer(Senior
      Officer in Charge of Servicing Function)CenterPoint
      Energy Houston Electric, LLC, as servicerMarch
      30, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tessera Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Henry R. Nothhaft, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    Henry R. Nothhaft             
|Henry R. Nothhaft                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 4, 2010                          

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tessera Technologies, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael Anthofer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Michael Anthofer                             
|Michael Anthofer                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|May 4, 2010                                         

A signed original of this written statement
required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.