alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7742

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALLAH BURMAN, a/k/a A,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:01-cr-00115-JKB-5; 1:20-cv-03003-JKB)

Submitted: October 14, 2021 Decided: January 11, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RICHARDSON, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allah Burman, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren Elizabeth Perry, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Allah Burman appeals the district court’s order construing his petition for writ of 

habeas corpus as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissing it without prejudice 

for failure to obtain pre-filing authorization from this Court.∗

 We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Burman’s pending motions and affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Burman, No. 1:01-cr00115-JKB-5 (D. Md. Oct. 20, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ We deny a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. See Harbison v. Bell, 556 

U.S. 180, 183 (2009); Fontanez v. O’Brien, 807 F.3d 84, 86 (4th Cir. 2015); United States 

v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 (4th Cir. 2015).
Before the Second Division,

January 27, 1943

No. 47959.

#### Protest 17246-K/88962 of G. W. Sheldon & Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 46497 the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained as to certain of the hats in question.
Before the Second Division,

August 13, 1942

No. 47444.

#### Protests 18204-K, etc., of Bleyco Paper Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is grease-proof paper, the same as that the subject of *Walker*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 11, C.D. 413). In accordance therewith the claim at 3 cents per pound and 15 percent ad valorem was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K / A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Emmanuel Tsoupanarias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 25, 2011


/s/ Emmanuel TsoupanariasEmmanuel TsoupanariasChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and will be retained by Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OPEN DOOR ONLINE, INC.
                      (FORMERLY GENESIS MEDIA GROUP, INC.)
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

For the year ended December 31:                            1999            1998
                                                      ---------     -----------

Income (Loss) as reported                             $(606,058)    $   (13,948)

Income tax expense                                           --              --
                                                      ---------     -----------
Net income (loss)                                     $(606,058)    $   (13,948)
                                                      =========     ===========

Basic earnings per share                              $   (0.11)    $     (0.00)
                                                      =========     ===========

Diluted earnings per share                            $   (0.11)    $     (0.00)
                                                      =========     ===========

Weighted average shares outstanding:                  5,432,863       7,000,000
                                                      =========     ===========

Fully diluted average shares outstanding:             5,432,863       7,000,000
                                                      =========     ===========
#### JEANNIE CONROY, AN INFANT, BY HER GUARDIAN *AD LITEM,*JOHN CONROY, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. 10 BREWSTER AVENUE CORP., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 97 *N. J. Super.*75.

*Messrs. Winne &*Banta, *Mr. Joseph A. Bizzi*and *Mr. Bichard A. Fiore*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Breslin & Monoghan*for the respondents.

February 27, 1968.

Denied.
#### Emilio Sanchez Y. Dolz, *Respondent, v.*Atlantic and Gulf Stream Transportation Company, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Order reversed. ' Opinion by Dwight, J.
**SEVENTH
      AMENDMENT OF**


**AMENDED
      AND RESTATED PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT**







This
      Seventh Amendment of the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement (the
      “Seventh Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 1 st day of
      July, 2008, by and between and Union Bank and Trust Company, a Nebraska banking
      corporation and trust company, solely in its capacity as trustee of various
      grantor trusts known as Short Term Federal Investment Trusts or other grantor
      trusts (“Trustee”) and National Education Loan Network, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (“Nelnet”).





**WHEREAS** ,
      the
      parties hereto entered into that certain Amended and Restated Participation
      Agreement dated as of June 1, 2001, as amended (the “Agreement”), and the
      parties hereto wish to amend the Agreement under the terms set forth herein.





**NOW,
      THEREFORE** ,
      in
      consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants herein
      contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:





1.  Definitions .
      Unless
      otherwise expressly stated herein, capitalized terms in this Seventh Amendment
      shall have the same meanings given to them in the Agreement.





2.  Adjustment
      of Participation Amount .
      For
      purposes of the Agreement and this Seventh Amendment, the maximum aggregate
      total of participation interests sold to Union Bank shall be $750 million,
      or
      such other amount as the parties may mutually agree upon from time to time.





3.  Applicability
      of Agreement to Nelnet Affiliates .
      The
      terms of the Agreement applicable to Nelnet shall be fully applicable not only
      to Nelnet, but also Nelnet’s parent, Nelnet, Inc., and all direct or indirect
      subsidiaries of Nelnet, Inc., without necessity of those entities’ execution of
      this Amendment.





4.  Change
      in Sixth Amendment .
      Effective as of July 1, 2008, the second sentence of Section 2 of the Sixth
      Amendment of Amended and Restated Participation Agreement dated as of December
      12, 2005 between the parties is hereby deleted.








5.  Effect
      of Amendment .
      This
      Seventh Amendment shall be effective as of the date first set forth above.
      Unless expressly modified or amended by this Amendment, all terms and provision
      contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without
      modification.










Union
              Bank and Trust Company,solely
              as in its capacity as trustee
            
            National Education Loan
              Network,
              Inc.By:
            
            
            By:Title:
            
            
            Title:
Before the Second Division,

December 21, 1954

No. 58620.

protests 163794-K, etc. (Detroit).

#### Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc.*(41 C. C. P. A. 95, C. A. D. 535), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Edward P. Paul *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6300.

Entry No. 715567, etc.

Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, August 20, 1941, etc.

Certified August 23, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 23, 1941, etc.

(Decided July 29, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon .the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise consisting of earthenware and chinaware and the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*Suit No. 4513, C. A. D. 334, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the appraised value of the merchandise consisting of earthenware and chinaware involved in each of the cases enumerated *266in the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8446 

To amend the Energy Act of 2020 to include critical materials in the 

definition of critical mineral, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2024 

Mr. CISCOMANI (for himself, Mr. NEWHOUSE, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Act of 2020 to include critical materials in the definition of critical mineral, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CRITICAL MATERIALS INCLUDED AS CRITICAL 

4 MINERALS. 

5 Section 7002 of the Energy Act of 2020 (30 U.S.C. 

6 1606) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(3)(A), to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘critical 

9 mineral’ means— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8446 IH

1 ‘‘(i) any mineral, element, substance, 

2 or material designated as critical by the 

3 Secretary under subsection (c); and 

4 ‘‘(ii) a critical material as determined 

5 by the Secretary of Energy under para6 graph (2)(A).’’; and 

7 (2) in subsection (c)(5), by adding at the end 

8 the following: 

9 ‘‘(C) INCLUSION OF CRITICAL MATE10 RIALS.—Not later than 45 days after the date 

11 on which the Secretary of Energy determines a 

12 non-fuel mineral, element, substance, or mate13 rial to be a critical material under subsection 

14 (a)(2)(A), the Secretary shall update the list of 

15 critical minerals published under paragraph (3) 

16 to include such critical material.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                       Ending
Class          Interest           Principal         Losses            Balance
<S>              <C>                <C>               <C>               <C>
A1              868046.5         678181.86                0       148129789.75
A10              3864.99                 0                0                  0
A11               583.33         100000.01                0                  0
A2             677186.98                 0                0          116089198
A3             252695.08          175222.1                0        43143933.64
A4              929994.4        1688085.97                0       147111018.09
A5             233850.08        -233850.08                0        40322435.08
A6             466490.66          60761.48                0        79909067.28
A7                     0         120577.59                0         10507934.1
A8             865176.66        2343689.35                0       145972309.67
A9             104354.95        1807719.65                0         16744272.1
ALR               505.31                 0                0                100
APO                    0          31276.32                0         9081183.62
AR                  0.58                 0                0                100
B1              95712.23          12466.73                0        16395342.88
B2              35010.13           4560.15                0          5997175.5
B3              23347.85           3041.11                0         3999448.82
B4              14006.38           1824.36                0         2399269.75
B5               7009.02            912.94                0         1200633.74
B6              11672.29           1476.69            43.63         1999443.17


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, certifies that to the best of his knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and its results of operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009.



|                        |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/ Tammie A. Quinlan                               
|Date: November 15, 2010 |  | TAMMIE A. QUINLAN                                   
|                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Marlin Business Services Corp.Date: August 8, 2007
 /s/ Daniel P. DyerDaniel P. DyerChief Executive Officer/s/ Lynne C. WilsonLynne C. WilsonChief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### The Society for the Reformation of Juvenile Delinquents in the City of New York, *Respondents, v.*George Nemback, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Dwight, J.
EX 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Arthur Viola, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of INFe-Human Resources, Inc.;



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



July 23, 2007



/s/  ARTHUR VIOLA

________________________

Arthur Viola

Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Guoshen Tu, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA SECURITY & SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 1stday of November 2007.

| |                                                                  |               
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------
| |                                                                  |               
| |                                                                  | /s/ Guoshen Tu
| | Guoshen Tu
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| |                                                                 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc. and will be retained by China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

Byron White United States Courthouse

1823 Stout Street
Denver, Colorado 80257
(303) 844

- 3157

February 26, 2018 Chris Wolpert Chief Deputy Clerk

Mr. Gregory Don Steinman Madison, Harbour & Mroz, P.A.

P.O. Box 25467 Albuquerque, NM 87102

RE: 17

- 2006, 17

- 2010, First Mercury Insurance v. Cincinnati Insurance Dist/Ag docket: 1:14

- CV

- 01052

- WJ

- LAM

Dear Counsel:

Enclosed is a copy of the opinion of the court issued today in this matter. The court has entered judgment on the docket pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 36.

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 40, any petition for rehearing must be filed within 14 days after entry of jud gment. Please note, however, that if the appeal is a civil case in which the United States or its officer or agency is a party, any petition for rehearing must be filed within 45 days after entry of judgment. Parties should consult both the Federal

Rules a nd local rules of this court with regard to applicable standards and requirements. In particular, petitions for rehearing may not exceed 15 pages in length, and no answer is permitted unless the court enters an order requiring a response. If requesting reh earing en banc, the requesting party must file 6 paper copies with the clerk, in addition to satisfying all Electronic Case Filing requirements. See Fed. R. App. P. Rules 35 and 40, and 10th Cir. R. 35 and 40 for further information governing petitions for rehearing. Appellate Case: 17-2006 Document: 01019949783 Date Filed: 02/26/2018 Page: 12 Please contact this office if you have questions.

Sincerely,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of the Court

cc: Tim L. Fields

Elizabeth A. Martinez

Nathan T. Nieman

EAS/lab Appellate Case: 17-2006 Document: 01019949783 Date Filed: 02/26/2018 Page: 2