Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 57 / Monday, March 26, 2007 / Notices 14095 

1 Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP, 118 FERC 

¶ 61,161 (2007). 

are also available for review in the 

Commission’s Public Reference Room in 

Washington, DC. There is an 

eSubscription link on the Web site that 

enables subscribers to receive e-mail 

notification when a document is added 

to a subscribed dockets(s). For 

assistance with any FERC Online 

service, please e-mail 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7–5461 Filed 3–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Project No. 2192–022–WI] 

Consolidated Water Power Company; 

Notice of Availability of Final 

Environmental Assessment 

March 20, 2007. 

In accordance with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and 

the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission’s (Commission) 

regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 

486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy 

Projects has reviewed an application for 

a transfer of project lands and 

acquisition of lands at the Biron Project 

(FERC No. 2192), and has prepared a 

final environmental assessment (FEA) 

for the proposal. The proposed transfer 

of project lands and acquisition of lands 

would occur on the Biron reservoir in 

Wood County, Wisconsin. 

In the application, Consolidated 

Water Power (licensee) requests 

Commission authorization to exchange 

approximately 3.14 acres of licenseeowned lands with 3,000 linear feet of 

shoreline along the Biron flowage, for 

three different parcels of land totaling 

approximately 205.213 total acres. The 

first parcel has 830 linear feet of river 

shoreline and consists of 47.546 acres. 

The second parcel has 126 linear feet of 

river shoreline and consists of 2.960 

acres, abutting an existing licenseeowned boat launch. The third parcel 

consists of islands in the river, 

peninsulas, and a roadside access 

totaling 154.84 acres (48.82 acres above 

water). These island perimeters, 

peninsulas, and the roadside access 

total 33,749 linear feet of waterfront. All 

lands are currently within the project 

boundary, and the licensee intends to 

retain flowage rights over any conveyed 

lands, and to retain all lands within the 

project boundary. The FEA contains the 

Commission staff’s analysis of the 

probable environmental impacts of the 

proposed land conveyances and 

exchanges. 

The FEA is attached to a Commission 

order titled ‘‘Order Amending License 

to Authorize Land Exchange,’’ which 

was issued November 17, 2006, and is 

available for review and reproduction at 

the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room, located at 888 First St., NE., 

Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426. The 

FEA may also be viewed on the 

Commission’s Web site at http:// 

www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘elibrary’’ link. 

Enter the docket number (prefaced by Pand excluding the last three digits) into 

the docket number field to access the 

document. For assistance, contact FERC 

Online Support at 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or tollfree at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY, 

contact (202) 502–8659. 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7–5459 Filed 3–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Project No. 12058–002, Project No. 12686–

001] 

Baker County, OR; Notice of Project 

Number and Docket Change for the 

Proposed Mason Dam Hydroelectric 

Project 

March 20, 2007. 

On April 27, 2006, Baker County, 

Oregon filed a Notice of Intent and PreApplication Document for the proposed 

Mason Dam Hydroelectric Project, 

initiating the pre-filing activities of the 

Commission’s Integrated Licensing 

Process. On May 23, 2006, Baker County 

filed an application for a second 

preliminary permit to allow for 

continued study of the site. The 

Commission issued the new preliminary 

permit to Baker County on January 19, 

2007. 

As a result of the issuance of the new 

preliminary permit, the project number 

assigned to Baker County for the 

proposed Mason Dam Hydroelectric 

Project has changed. The new project 

number is P–12686. All future filings 

being made in regards to the ongoing 

pre-filing activities of the Integrated 

Licensing Process for the proposed 

project should use P–12686–001 to 

identify the filing. The original project 

number and docket (P–12058–002), 

assigned to this proceeding and the 

proposed project is now CLOSED. 

All filings made to date, under P–

12058–002 with regard to the pre-filing 

activities of the Commission’s Integrated 

Licensing Process for the proposed 

Mason Dam Hydroelectric Project, will 

be cross referenced to the new project 

number and docket P–12686–001 and 

will continue to be part of the official 

public record. Therefore, re-filing of 

these documents is not necessary. 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7–5458 Filed 3–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. RP07–149–000] 

Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP; 

Notice of Technical Conference 

March 20, 2007. 

Take notice that the Commission will 

convene a technical conference in the 

referenced proceeding on Tuesday, 

April 10, 2007, at 9 a.m. (EDT), in a 

room to be designated at the offices of 

the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 

Washington DC 20426. 

The Commission’s February 28, 2007 

order in this proceeding directed that a 

technical conference be held to address 

the technical, engineering and 

operational issues raised by Gulf South 

Pipeline Company, LP’s (Gulf South) 

proposed gas quality specifications filed 

in Docket No. RP07–149–000.1

Gulf South and the other parties 

should be prepared to address the 

following topics at the technical 

conference and to include technical, 

engineering and operational information 

in support: 

1. Whether Gulf South’s tariff 

proposals are consistent with the 

Interim Guidelines in the Natural Gas 

Council’s White Papers on Natural Gas 

Interchangeability and Non-Combustion 

End Use and Liquid Hydrocarbon Drop 

Out in Natural Gas Infrastructure? 

2. To the extent Gulf South’s 

proposals are not consistent with the 

guidelines, has Gulf South supported 

any divergence from the Interim 

Guidelines? 

3. Whether Gulf South’s current 

operating parameters are sufficient to 

ensure the acceptance of gas by 

interconnecting pipelines? 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES