alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.19

 

RIDER NO. 2 TO THE P30 CDISCOUNT PICK-UP POINT CONTRACT

 

The company CDISCOUNT, a Limited Company with capital of €5,162,154.62, the head offices of which are located at 120-126 Quai de Bacalan, 33000 Bordeaux, registered in the Business and Companies Registry of Bordeaux under number 424 059 822,

 

Represented by Mr. Emmanuel GRENIER, CEO, duly authorized for the purposes of this document,

 

Hereinafter known as “CDISCOUNT”,

 

Party of the first part,

 

AND

 

The company DISTRIBUTION CASINO FRANCE, Société par Actions Simplifiée (a simplified joint-stock company) with capital of €106,758,801, the head offices of which are located at 1 Esplanade de France, 42000 Saint-Etienne, registered in the Business and Companies Registry of Saint-Etienne under number 428 268 023,

 

Represented by Mr. Gérard WALTER, duly authorized for the purposes of this document,

 

Hereinafter known as “DCF”,

 

Party of the second part,

 

with CDISCOUNT and DCF hereinafter known as the “Party” or “Parties”.

 

WHEREAS:

 

The Parties have signed a “P30 CDISCOUNT PICK-UP POINT CONTRACT”, effective since January 1, 2009, according to which DCF provides the service known as a “Withdrawal Point” on behalf of CDISCOUNT for the customers of the latter in its stores.

 

The Parties have extended the duration of this 10-year contract via Rider No. 1, effective since June 1, 2014.

 

The Contract and Rider No. 1 will hereinafter together be known as the “Contract”.

 

Because the parties decided to make changes to the price of the services provided by DCF to CDISCOUNT, considering market conditions, the Parties have agreed to sign this Rider No. 2.

 

HAVING STATED THE AFOREMENTIONED, THE FOLLOWING CLAUSES WERE AGREED TO:

 

ARTICLE 1.

 

Article 7.1 “Price” of the Contract is being removed and replaced by Article 7.1 “Price” as follows:

 

“CDISCOUNT pays DCF eight euros and fifty cents excluding taxes (€8.50 excluding taxes) for each package received by each Store and correctly reported in the computer applications for tracking packages.

 











 

This amount constitutes a lump sum payment that is complete and final: it covers all of the services provided by DCF and its stores pursuant to the Contract. No additional payment will be paid by CDISCOUNT.”

 

ARTICLE 2.

 

This rider is retroactively effective to January 1, 2014.

 

The other provisions of the Contract, which have not been amended by this Rider No. 2, remain in effect and fully applicable.

 

As a consequence of the provisions of this rider, the Parties will make the necessary financial and accounting adjustments.

 

Signed in Bordeaux, December 19, 2014, with 2 copies.

 

	
For   CDISCOUNT
    	
 
    	
For DISTRIBUTION CASINO FRANCE
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Emmanuel   GRENIER, CEO
    	
 
    	
Gérard   WALTER, CEO
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Emmanuel Grenier
    	
 
    	
/s/   Gérard Walter
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Yangkan Chong, the
Chief Executive Officer of CHINA NEW ENERGY GROUP COMPANY (the “Company”), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.      The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has executed this statement this 20th day of May, 2009.





/s/ Yangkan ChongYangkan
      ChongChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China New Energy Group Company and will be retained by China New Energy Group
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Before the Second Division,

April 27, 1961

No. 65541.

#### Douglas Homs Co. and Arthur J. Fritz & Co. et al. *v.*United States

protests 59/29647, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of scales similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 63285, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 54124.

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 563371-G, etc. (Milwaukee).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14513-14514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5440]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 07-1128; MB Docket No. 05-249; RM-10778, RM-11259]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Glenmora and Marksville, LA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Audio Division dismisses a Petition for Rule Making filed 
by Charles Crawford, requesting the allotment of Channel 292A at 
Glenmora, Louisiana, as its first local service. Charles Crawford, or 
no other party, filed comments supporting the allotment of Channel 292A 
at Glenmora, Louisiana. Additionally, a Petition for Rule Making filed 
by Goudeau, Inc., proposing the allotment of Channel 292A at 
Marksville, Louisiana, as its first local service is also dismissed.

[[Page 14514]]

Goudeau, Inc. or no other party, filed comments supporting the 
allotment of Channel 292A at Marksville, Louisiana. It is the 
Commission's policy to refrain from making a new allotment to a 
community absent an expression of interest. Moreover, the license of 
Station KIOC, Orange, Texas was reclassified to specify operation on 
Channel 291C0 in lieu of Channel 291C. See File No. BLH-20030303ACM.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 05-249, adopted March 7, 2007, and 
released March 9, 2007. The Notice of Proposed Rule Making proposed the 
mutually exclusive allotments of Channel 292A at Glenmora, Louisiana 
and Channel 292A at Marksville, Louisiana. See 70 FR 48358, published 
August 17, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC's 
Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Room 
CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best 
Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. This document is not subject to the Congressional 
Review Act. (The Commission is, therefore, not required to submit a 
copy of this Report and Order to GAO, pursuant to the Congressional 
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the proposed rule was 
dismissed.)

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. E7-5440 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
(Reap. Dec. 9195)

#### Meier & Frank Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 829, etc.

(Decided July 22, 1958)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court:

> That the issues involved in the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, are the same in all material respects as the issue involved in *Meier & Frank Co. Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9057.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation of the merchandise involved, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States was the appraised values less the amount added under duress by reason of Section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation for home consumption therein was no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in *Meier & Frank Co. Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9057 be incorporated herein and the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule A be submitted herewith.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for *498the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the amount added under duress by reason of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00512-CV

Edgar Rodriguez, Appellant

v.

Lynn O. Rodriguez, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 428TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 14-1600, HONORABLE BRENDA K. SMITH, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The Clerk of this Court filed appellant’s notice of appeal on Aug. 12, 2015, and the

clerk and reporter’s records were due on September 8, 2015. On September 14, 2015, the Clerk of

this Court sent notice to appellant that the records were overdue and requested that appellant make

arrangement for payment and submit a status report on or before September 24, 2015. Appellant

filed a status report with the Court, requesting that the appeal be continued because a hearing before

the district court was scheduled on October 22, 2015. We abated the appeal, advised the parties that

the appeal would be automatically reinstated on November 2, 2015, and directed the parties to file

a status report or motion to dismiss by that date.

This appeal was reinstated on November 2, 2015. On that date, appellee filed a

supplemental motion to dismiss on the ground that appellant had failed to pay for the record or make
arrangements to pay for it. Appellant filed a supplemental response to the motion to dismiss, asking

for twenty-one more days to obtain the records and seven days to provide docketing statement and

fees requested by this Court. Appellee has now filed a reply to the response, disputing appellant’s

portrayal of the facts and representing that appellant has not contacted the court reporter regarding

the transcript from the final hearing in June 2015.

This Court orders that appellant’s deadline to pay for or make arrangements for the

records is December 9, 2015. No further extensions will be granted. Appellant is directed to submit

a status report with this Court by that date regarding this appeal. If appellant fails to do so, this Court

will dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

It is ordered on November 24, 2015.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-573]



[[Page 2275]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-72-005]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund Report

January 10, 2007.
    Take notice that on January 8, 2007, Northern Border Pipeline 
Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing a refund report showing 
the computation of refunds that were made to Northern Border's 
customers pursuant to Articles X-XII of the Stipulation and Agreement 
dated September 18, 2006, filed in Docket No. RP06-72-000 (Stipulation 
and Agreement) and approved by the Commission in a Letter Order on 
November 21, 2006 (117 FERC ] 61,217).
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a 
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a7c7f687975545653545f694f4a4a55484e7a5c5f4859145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c5a594e5f5372707572794f696c6c736e685c7a796e7f327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 17, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-573 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 4TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

 

**THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4**tothe Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1999, as amended to date(the *“Agreement”*), by and between**EACCELERATION CORP.**,a Delaware corporation (the *“Company”*),and **CLINTON L.BALLARD** (*“Employee”*)is dated for reference purposes as of August 21, 2004 (this *“Amendment”*).

 

**WHEREAS**, theCompany and Employee desire to amend the terms of the Agreement, pursuant tothe terms and conditions set forth herein, as of the date hereof.

 

**NOW, THEREFORE**,in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, andintending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1.                                     The first sentenceof Subparagraph (a) of Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended inits entirety as follows:

 

During the term ofemployment, Employee shall be employed by the Company as President, Chairman ofthe Board and Chief Executive Officer or in such other equivalent positionswith the Company and its affiliates, as may be determined by the Board ofDirectors of the Company, and shall also serve as a director of the Company.

 

2.                                       Subparagraph(a) of Paragraph 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety asfollows:

 

The Company shall pay toEmployee a salary at the rate of $208,000 per annum, payable in equal bi-weeklyinstallments, or in such other manner as shall be consistent with the Company’spayroll practices.

 

3.                                       Paragraph10 of the Agreement is hereby amended to delete in its entirety the referenceto Neil M. Kaufman and insert in its place “Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson,P.S., 500 Galland Building, 1221 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101-2925,Attention: Joel N. Bodansky.”

 

4.                                       Thechanges to the Agreement made by this Amendment shall be effective as of thedate hereof, and shall amend and supersede any provisions to the contrarycontained in the Agreement.  Except asexpressly amended by this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreementshall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms of theAgreement.

 

**(*signature page follows*)**

 

1

----

 

**IN WITNESS HEREOF**,the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

 
|   | **EACCELERATION CORP.** |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                    |   |
|   | By:                     | /s/ E. Edward Ahrens |   |
|   |                    |  Name: E. Edward  Ahrens |
|   |                    |  Title: Chief  Financial Officer |
|   |                    |   |
|   |                    |   |
|   | **EMPLOYEE:**           |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Clinton L. Ballard  |   |
|   | Clinton L. Ballard      |

 

2

----
#### Charles Stanford *v.*Williston B. Lockwood.

—Motion denied. Mem. by Brady, J.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Travel Hunt Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nancy
Reynolds, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Travel Hunt Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Travel Hunt
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


May 21, 2004                   /s/ Nancy Reynolds
                               -----------------------------------
                               Nancy Reynolds
                               President, Chief Executive Officer and
                               Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40406 Summary Calendar

__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WESLEY WILLIAM WALTER, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:94-CV-310

- - - - - - - - - - February 7, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Wesley William Walter appeals the district court's denial of his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Walter's claim regarding counsel's failure to file a notice of appeal is without merit because Walter validly waived his right to appeal his
sentence. S ee United States v. Portillo , 18 F.3d 290, 293 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 244 (1994). Walter's claim that his plea agreement was vague and unenforceable because it failed to specify that other criminal acts may be used against him at2

sentencing also is without merit. Any indication of such in the plea agreement would have been purely speculative and thus properly

was not included in the agreement. We do not address for the first tim e on appeal Walter's newly-raised argument concerning the allegedly "false facts of jurisdiction" con tained within the indictment. S ee Varnad o v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
EX-32 CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Transition Report of ViaStar Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the transition period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), John D. Aquilino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and George J. Malasek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ JOHN D. AQUILINO                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|John D. Aquilino
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



Dated: October 15, 2003





|/s/ GEORGE J. MALASEK                                                                 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|George J. Malasek
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



Dated: October 15, 2003

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ViaStar Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by ViaStar Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries

As of December 31, 2005, Mirae Corporation had seven subsidiaries, all of which
were Korean corporations, except Mirae America, Inc., a California corporation, and Mirae (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation. Set forth below is a list of such companies and Miraes percentage of shareholding interest in them.



|                             |  |           
|---------------------------- |  | ----------
|Company Name                 |  | Percentage
|Mirae (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.  |  | 99.00     
|Korea Internet.com Co., Ltd. |  | 87.38     
|GLD Co., Ltd.                |  | 80.00     
|Mirae Online, Co., Ltd.      |  | 70.85     
|Mirae America Inc.           |  | 50.00     
|Cyber Bank Co., Ltd          |  | 26.87     
|AIO Corporation              |  | 21.63