alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Balanced Series.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                             
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                               
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                    
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: August 11, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   255
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,255)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,255)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8511 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on 

transitioning military acquired credentials to the civilian workforce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2024 

Mrs. TORRES of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress 

a report on transitioning military acquired credentials 

to the civilian workforce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Servicemember Equal 

5 Recognition and Transition Support Act’’ or the ‘‘SERTS 

6 Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8511 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON THE NUMBER OF VETERANS WHO HAVE 

2 THEIR MILITARY ACQUIRED CREDENTIALS 

3 RECOGNIZED AT THE STATE-LEVEL FOR THE 

4 CIVILIAN WORKFORCE. 

5 (a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

6 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in con7 sultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the 

8 Secretary of Labor, shall submit to Congress a report that 

9 builds on the data reported in the ‘‘DoD Credentialing 

10 Utilization’’ report from 2018 (3-BB02A16) to better as11 sess the effectiveness of the Credentialing Programs for 

12 post-military civilian employment. 

13 (b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under sub14 section (a) shall include the following: 

15 (1) An assessment of the number of veterans 

16 who successfully transfer their eligible professional 

17 credentials to civilian jobs. 

18 (2) An assessment of which certifications were 

19 most commonly used for post-military civilian em20 ployment, such as airplane mechanics. 

21 (3) An assessment on any other barriers vet22 erans face to transferring military mechanical skills 

23 to State certifications. 

24 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

25 (1) The term ‘‘applicable licensing authority’’ 

26 means the licensing authority by a State for a given 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8511 IH

1 vocation in which the veteran works or would like to 

2 work. 

3 (2) The term ‘‘eligible professional credential’’ 

4 means a professional credential, including a profes5 sional credential in the field of airplane mechanics, 

6 obtained using expenses paid pursuant to the pro7 gram under section 2015 of title 10, United States 

8 Code. 

9 (3) The term ‘‘expenses’’ has the meaning given 

10 such term in such section. 

11 (4) The term ‘‘servicemember’’ has the meaning 

12 given such term in section 101 of the 

13 Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 4025a). 

14 (5) The term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several 

15 States and territories and the District of Columbia. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Charles P. Devlin, *Respondent, v.*William Kelley, *Appel*lant.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinions by Daniels, J., and Davis, P. J., and by Macomber, J., dissenting.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 24, 2020

t1116

Order 

Clerk

November 24, 2020

161193

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161193

COA: 346063

Wayne CC: 17-010813-FC

MARTIN GARCIA MARTINEZ, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8226 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States to carry out a 

study regarding major rules issued by the Securities and Exchange 

Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2024 

Mr. GARBARINO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States 

to carry out a study regarding major rules issued by 

the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY REGARDING MAJOR RULES ISSUED BY 

4 THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMIS5 SION. 

6 (a) STUDY REQUIRED.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), 

8 not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

9 of this Act, and every 3 years thereafter, the CompVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:39 Jun 03, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8226.IH H8226

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8226 IH

1 troller General of the United States shall carry out 

2 a study on each of the major rules issued by the Se3 curities and Exchange Commission since the last 

4 such review. 

5 (2) ELEMENTS.—The study required under 

6 paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to each 

7 major rule described in such paragraph— 

8 (A) a cost benefit analysis of such major 

9 rule; 

10 (B) a comparison between the cost benefit 

11 analysis under subparagraph (A) and the cost 

12 benefit analysis for the same major rule carried 

13 out by the Securities and Exchange Commis14 sion; 

15 (C) a comparison between the projected 

16 costs of the major rule and the actual costs of 

17 the major rule; and 

18 (D) an evaluation of whether each major 

19 rule— 

20 (i) facilitates capital formation; 

21 (ii) promotes fair, efficient markets; 

22 and 

23 (iii) protects investors. 

24 (3) SPECIAL RULE.—If a study required under 

25 paragraph (1) would apply to more than 10 major 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8226 IH

1 rules, the Comptroller General shall review only the 

2 10 major rules that are the most significant, as de3 termined by the Comptroller General. 

4 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after completing 

5 a study under subsection (a), the Comptroller General 

6 shall submit to the Committee on Financial Services of 

7 the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

8 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs a report that in9 cludes— 

10 (1) the results of such study; and 

11 (2) with respect to any major rule reviewed in 

12 such study that has not yet been fully implemented 

13 by the Commission, a statement that the Comp14 troller General is unable to fully analyze the costs of 

15 the major rule at the time the report is submitted. 

16 (c) MAJOR RULE DEFINED.—In this section, the 

17 term ‘‘major rule’’ has the meaning given the term in sec18 tion 804 of title 5, United States Code. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q of Summit Financial Services Group, Inc. (the Company), for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marshall T. Leeds, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Marshall T. Leeds                                       
|Marshall T. Leeds                                           
|Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
|                                                            
|Dated: November 15, 2010
No. 65596.

#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/23197(A) (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Prom a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was, therefore, overruled.
Exhibit 99.8


Supply Agreement





(Unofficial English Translation)





Contract No. X-JT20110101


Place of execution: Pindingshan


Date of execution: January 1, 2011





Seller: Henan Province Pindingshan Coal and Coking Co., Ltd.


Buyer: Wuhan Railway Zhongli Group Co., Ltd.





I. Purchase Order


Amount of Purchase (metric tons)Name of Receiver

Departure

Station

Arrival

Station

Goods

Specification

Yearly Total

Purchase


First

Quarter


Second

Quarter


Third

Quarter


Fourth

QuarterWuhan Railway Zhongli

Group Co., Ltd.

East Pingdingshan

Wu Gang

Coke

Carbon ≥ 84%

Volatility ≤ 1.9%

Ash ≤ 13.5%

Sulfur ≤ 0.7%

M25 ≥ 88%

M10 ≤ 8.5%


120,000



30,000



30,000



30,000



30,000





II. The price of the goods shall be RMB 1,800 per metric ton, subject to further negotiation between the parties according to the market price at the time of delivery.





III. A difference of 0.8 metric tons per truckload from the order amount shall be allowed without requiring additional payment or refund. Any difference of more than 0.8 metric tons per truckload from the order amount shall be resolved by additional payment or refund based on the actual amount delivered.





IV. Seller shall not deliver the goods until Buyer completes a sample inspection and gives permission to Seller to deliver.





V. Buyer shall pay for the goods when the goods are loaded and ready for delivery.





VI. Any unsettled matter under this Agreement shall be resolved through consultation between the parties. This Agreement is effective through December 31, 2011.





Seller: Henan Province Pindingshan Coal and Coking Co., Ltd. [corporate seal]


Buyer: Wuhan Railway Zhongli Group Co., Ltd. [corporate seal]
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Manhattan Scientifics,  Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Marvin Maslow, Chief Executive
Officer,  President  and the person  performing  similar  functions to the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

(1)  Fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The  information  contained  in such  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB  fairly
presents  in all  material  respects  the  financial  condition  and  results of
operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906,  another
document authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been  provided to Manhattan  Scientifics,  Inc. and
will be retained by Manhattan Scientifics,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                    /s/ Marvin Maslow
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Marvin Maslow
                                    Chief Executive Officer, President and
                                    Principal Financial Officer

April 4, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alamosa (Delaware), Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David E. Sharbutt, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





   /s/ David E. Sharbutt
-----------------------------------------------
Name:  David E. Sharbutt
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 15, 2004



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EX 31.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of INFe-Human Resources, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Arthur Viola, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of INFe-Human Resources, Inc.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  July 24, 2006  /s/  ARTHUR VIOLA ________________________ Arthur Viola Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT L. JARRETT, JR.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

PRO SE CLERKS OFFICE, in their

official capacities; et al.,

 Defendants.

No. 09-56032

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-02446-VBF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

FILED

JUL 23 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-56032

Robert L. Jarrett, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

his action for failure to effect service of process within 120 days, as required by

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Puett v. Blandford, 912 F.2d 270,

273 (9th Cir. 1990), and we reverse and remand. 

The district court allowed Jarrett to proceed without prepayment of filing

fees, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) (authorizing federal courts to allow a plaintiff to

proceed without prepayment of filing fees), entitling him to have officers of the

court issue and serve all process, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3);

Puett, 912 F.2d at 273. The district court abused its discretion by dismissing

Jarrett’s request for court officers to effect service and then dismissing the action

for lack of service. If on remand the district court determines that the complaint

survives 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) (requiring the district court to

dismiss an action filed under § 1915(a) that is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state

a claim on which relief may be granted), then the court should proceed to order

service of process under § 1915(d).

Jarrett shall bear his own costs on appeal.
3 09-56032

Jarrett’s motions filed on October 13, 2009, and November 20, 2009, are

denied.

REVERSED and REMANDED.