CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management D istrict

Rule No(s): 1110 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Rescinded January 15, 2013

Rule Title(s): Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstration)

Date Submitted to ARB: 09/23/2013

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): N/A

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Barbara Lods Phone Number: (66 1) 728-8070 x3 E-mail Address: blods@avaqmd.ca.go v

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Rule 1110-Emmissions From Stationary Internal Combu stion Engines (Demonstration) was adopted by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on N ovember 6, 1981 to set up a demonstration program t o collect emission data for SCAQMD Rule 1110.1 - Emis sions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines. The SCAQMD demonstration program was completed on or ab out November 1991. This was prior to the formation of the Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District on 7/1/1997. Rule 1110 was subsequently rescinded by the SCAQMD on November 14, 1997. Due to the provisions of the implementing statute (former H&S Code §4010 6, A.B. 266-Knight Ch. 542, statutes of 1996) and the subsequent statutory creation of the Antelope Valle y Air Quality Management District (H&S Code §41300 et seq .) the rule remained in the AVAQMD rule book though it was inapplicable due to the termination of the prog ram and the fact that none of the program engines w ere located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD. The AVAQMD rescinded this rule due to its inapplicability

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2 (CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when imp lemented, will result in quantifiable changes in em issions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s )

and other information. Attach calculation sheet sh owing how the emission information provided below w as determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Sourc e Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissio ns: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) : N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measu re: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluati on Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emis sion forecasting and planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Source s Affected by this Amendment: 0

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Cont inuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) N/A of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Re ductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practic e Standards in Section(s): N/A Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Rep orting Requirements in Section(s): N/A5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: This rule remained in the AVAQMD rule book though it was inapplicable due to the terminat ion of the program and the fact that none of the program engin es were located within what is now the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD. The AVAQMD rescinded this rule due to its inapplica bility, and there is no potential that the rescissi on might cause the

release of additional air contaminants or create an y adverse environmental impacts.