Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 46525 

state law. Accordingly, the 

Administrator certifies that this rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq). Because this 

rule approves pre-existing requirements 

under state law and does not impose 

any additional enforceable duty beyond 

that required by state law, it does not 

contain any unfunded mandate or 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments, as described in the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–4). 

This rule also does not have tribal 

implications because it will not have a 

substantial direct effect on one or more 

Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

as specified by Executive Order 13175 

(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This 

action also does not have Federalism 

implications because it does not have 

substantial direct effects on the States, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999). This action merely 

approves a state rule implementing a 

Federal standard, and does not alter the 

relationship or the distribution of power 

and responsibilities established in the 

Clean Air Act. This rule also is not 

subject to Executive Order 13045 

‘‘Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), 

because it approves a state rule 

implementing a Federal standard. 

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s 

role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the 

absence of a prior existing requirement 

for the State to use voluntary consensus 

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 

to disapprove a SIP submission for 

failure to use VCS. It would thus be 

inconsistent with applicable law for 

EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, 

to use VCS in place of a SIP submission 

that otherwise satisfies the provisions of 

the Clean Air Act. Thus, the 

requirements of section 12(d) of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) do not apply. This rule does 

not impose an information collection 

burden under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq, as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this rule and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by September 30, 

2013. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the proposed rules 

section of today’s Federal Register, 

rather than file an immediate petition 

for judicial review of this direct final 

rule, so that EPA can withdraw this 

direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements. (See Clean Air Act section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, and 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: July 16, 2013. 

Judith Wong, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as 

follows: 

PART 52 [AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart G—Colorado 

■ 2. Section 52.349 is amended by 

adding paragraph (o) to read as follows: 

§ 52.349 Control strategy: Carbon 

monoxide. 

* * * * * 

(o) Revisions to the Colorado State 

Implementation Plan, revised Carbon 

Monoxide Maintenance Plan for 

Colorado Springs, as adopted by the 

Colorado Air Quality Control 

Commission on December 17, 2009 and 

submitted by the Governor’s designee 

on March 31, 2010. 

[FR Doc. 2013–18438 Filed 7–31–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

43 CFR Part 1820 

[LLNM910000–L102000000.PH0000] 

RIN 1004–AE33 

Application Procedures, Execution and 

Filing of Forms: Correction of State 

Office Address for Filings and 

Recordings, Including Proper Offices 

for Recording of Mining Claims; New 

Mexico/Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This final rule amends the 

regulations pertaining to execution and 

filing of forms in order to reflect the 

new address of the New Mexico/ 

Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas State Office of 

the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). 

All filings and other documents relating 

to public lands in the States of New 

Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas 

must be filed at the new address of the 

State Office. 

DATES: This rule is effective August 1, 

2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may send inquiries or 

suggestions to the Chief, Office of 

Communications (912), Bureau of Land 

Management, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, 

NM 87502–0115. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Donna Hummel, 505–954–2018. Persons 

who use a telecommunications device 

for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– 

800–877–8339, 24 hours a day, 7 days 

a week, to leave a message for Ms. 

Hummel. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

46526 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

II. Procedural Matters 

I. Background 

This final rule reflects the 

administrative action of changing the 

street address of the New Mexico/ 

Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas State Office of 

the BLM. Both the postal mailing 

address (P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, NM 

87502–0115) and the phone number 

(505–954–2000) remain the same. This 

rule changes the street address for the 

personal filing of documents relating to 

public lands in New Mexico, Oklahoma, 

Texas, and Kansas, but makes no other 

changes in filing requirements. The 

BLM has determined that the rule has 

no substantive impact on the public, 

imposes no costs, and merely updates a 

list of addresses included in the Code of 

Federal Regulations for the convenience 

of the public. The Department of the 

Interior, therefore, for good cause finds 

that under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and 

553(d)(3) notice and public comment 

procedures are unnecessary and that the 

rule may take effect immediately. 

II. Procedural Matters 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

(Executive Order 12866) 

This final rule is an administrative 

action to change the address for one 

BLM State Office. This rule was not 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866. The rule 

imposes no costs, and merely updates a 

list of addresses included in the Code of 

Federal Regulations for the convenience 

of the public. 

National Environmental Policy Act 

The BLM has found that the final rule 

is of a procedural nature and thus is 

categorically excluded from 

environmental review under Section 

102(2)(C) of the Environmental 

Protection Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 

U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), pursuant to 43 CFR 

46.210(i). In addition, the final rule does 

not present any of the 12 extraordinary 

circumstances listed at 43 CFR 46.215. 

Pursuant to the Council on 

Environmental Quality regulations (40 

CFR 1508.4) and the environmental 

regulations, policies, and procedures of 

the Department of the Interior, the term 

‘‘categorical exclusions’’ means a 

category of actions which do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment and that have been found 

to have no such effect in procedures 

adopted by a Federal agency and for 

which neither an environmental 

assessment nor an environmental 

impact statement is required. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

Congress enacted the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601, et 

seq.) to ensure that Government 

regulations do not unnecessarily or 

disproportionately burden small 

entities. This final rule is a purely 

administrative regulatory action having 

no effect upon the public or the 

environment and it has been determined 

that the rule will not have a significant 

effect on the economy or small entities. 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act 

This final rule is a purely 

administrative regulatory action having 

no effects upon the public or the 

economy. This is not a major rule under 

the Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 

804(2)). The rule will not have an 

annual effect on the economy of $100 

million or more. The rule will not cause 

a major increase in costs of prices for 

consumers, individual industries, 

Federal, State, or local government 

agencies, or geographic regions. The 

rule will not have significant adverse 

effects on competition, employment, 

investment, productivity, innovation, or 

the ability of United States-based 

enterprises to complete with foreignbased enterprises. 

Unfunded Mandate Reform Act 

The BLM has determined that this 

final rule is not significant under the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

because the rule will not result in the 

expenditure by State, local, and tribal 

governments, in the aggregate, or by the 

private sector, of $100 million or more 

in any one year. Further, the final rule 

will not significantly or uniquely affect 

small governments. It does not require 

action by any non-Federal government 

entity. Therefore, the information 

required by the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), is not 

required. 

Executive Order 12630, Government 

Action and Interference With 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights (Takings) 

As required by Executive Order 

12630, the Department of the Interior 

has determined that the rule would not 

cause a taking of private property. No 

private property rights would be 

affected by a rule that merely reports an 

address change for the New Mexico/ 

Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas State Office. 

The Department therefore certifies that 

this final rule does not represent a 

governmental action capable of 

interference with constitutionally 

protected property rights. 

Executive Order 13132, Federalism 

In accordance with Executive Order 

13132, the BLM finds that the rule does 

not have sufficient federalism 

implications to warrant the preparation 

of a federalism summary impact 

statement. The final rule does not have 

substantial direct effects on the States, 

on the relationship between the national 

governments and the States, or the 

distribution of power and the 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. This final rule 

does not preempt State law. 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform 

This final rule is a purely 

administrative regulatory action having 

no effects upon the public and will not 

unduly burden the judicial system and 

meets the requirements of Sections 3(a) 

and 3(b)(2) of the Executive Order. 

Executive Order 13175, Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

In accordance with the Executive 

Order 13175, the BLM finds that the 

rule does not include policies that have 

tribal implications. This final rule is 

purely an administrative action having 

no effects upon the public or the 

environment, imposing no costs, and 

merely updating the BLM, New Mexico/ 

Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas State Office 

address included in the Code of Federal 

Regulations. 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

In accordance with Executive Order 

13211, the BLM has determined that the 

final rule will not have substantial 

direct effects on the energy supply, 

distribution or use, including a shortfall 

in supply or price increase. This final 

rule is a purely administrative action 

and has no implications under 

Executive Order 13211. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

The Paperwork Reduction Act does 

not apply because the rule does not 

contain any information collection 

requirements that require the approval 

of the Office of Management and Budget 

under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. 

List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 1820 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Archives and records, Public 

lands. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 46527 

Dated: July 22, 2013. 

Tommy P. Beaudreau, 

Acting Assistant Secretary, Land and 

Minerals Management. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Bureau of Land 

Management amends 43 CFR part 1820 

as follows: 

PART 1820—APPLICATION 

PROCEDURES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 1820 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 43 U.S.C. 2, 1201, 

1733, and 1740. 

Subpart 1821—General Information 

■ 2. Amend § 1821.10 in paragraph (a) 

by removing the entry for New Mexico 

and adding in its place an entry for New 

Mexico/Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas to read 

as follows: 

§ 1821.10 Where are BLM offices located? 

(a) * * * 

STATE OFFICES AND AREAS OF 

JURISDICTION 

* * * * * 

New Mexico State Office, 310 

Dinosaur Trail, Santa Fe, NM 87508, 

P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico 

87502–0115—Kansas, New Mexico, 

Oklahoma, and Texas. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–18523 Filed 7–31–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES