14552 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 28, 2007 / Notices 

DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 

(703) 305-6463; fax number: (703) 605- 

0781; e-mail address: 

madden.barbara@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this Action Apply to Me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, and 

agricultural advocates; the chemical 

industry; pesticide users; and members 

of the public interested in the sale, 

distribution, or use of pesticides. Since 

others also may be interested, the 

Agency has not attempted to describe all 

the specific entities that may be affected 

by this action. If you have any questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

to a particular entity, consult the person 

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare 

My Comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD ROM the specific information that is 

claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

i. Identify the document by docket 

(ID) number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

iv. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

v. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

vi. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

vii. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

viii. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. Background 

A. What Action is the Agency Taking? 

On February 20, 2007, the Natural 

Resources Defense Council (‘‘NRDC’’) 

filed objections to a final rule 

establishing tolerances for the pesticide 

boscalid on two crop subgroups in the 

leafy vegetables crop group. (December 

20, 2006 (71 FR 76185; FRL–8107–8)). 

Pesticide tolerances are established 

under section 408 of the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (‘‘FFDCA’’). (21 

U.S.C. 346a). The new tolerances were 

for Crop Subgroup 4A, leafy greens 

except head and leaf lettuce, and Crop 

Subgroup 4B, leafy petioles. 

NRDC’s objections assert that it was 

unlawful for EPA to remove the 

additional 10X safety factor for the 

protection of infants and children in 

assessing the risk of boscalid because 

the evidence shows that juveniles are 

more sensitive to boscalid than adults. 

NRDC claims that if the 10X children’s 

safety factor is retained, the boscalid 

tolerances do not meet the safety 

standard for establishing tolerances 

under FFDCA section 408. Additionally, 

NRDC argues that EPA’s action was 

arbitrary and capricious for failing to 

provide an adequate explanation for the 

decision on the children’s safety factor. 

Because the issues raised by NRDC 

concern matters of great interest not just 

to NRDC but to growers, food 

distributors and processors, and 

pesticide manufacturers as well as 

members of the public, EPA believes it 

decision-making will be enhanced by 

obtaining the views of all affected 

parties. For that reason, EPA is 

publishing this notice of availability of 

NRDC’s objections and requesting 

comment on the objections. The 

objections are available in the docket for 

the tolerance rule in question, i.e., 

Docket EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0145. See 

the ‘‘ADDRESSES’’ section of this 

document for information accessing the 

docket. 

B. What is the Agency’s Authority for 

Taking this Action? 

Under section 408(g)(2)(A) of the 

FFDCA, any person may file objections 

with EPA within 60 days of issuance of 

a final tolerance regulation. (21 U.S.C. 

346a(g)(2)). Such person may also 

request a public evidentiary hearing on 

the objections; however, NRDC has not 

requested such a hearing. Under EPA 

regulations, EPA must publish an order 

setting forth its determination on each 

of NRDC’s objections. (40 CFR 

178.37(a)). Such order must contain 

EPA’s reasons for its determination. (40 

CFR 178.37(b)). If based on the 

objections EPA determines that the 

tolerance regulation should be modified 

or revoked, EPA will publish by order 

any revisions to the regulation. (21 

U.S.C. 346a(g)(2)(C); 40 CFR 178.35). 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, Pesticides 

and pests. 

Dated: March 14, 2007. 

Donald R. Stubbs, 

Acting Director, Registration Division, Office 

of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. E7–5576 Filed 3–27–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–8292–5] 

Proposed CERCLA Administrative 

Agreement for Recovery of Response 

Costs; Denova Superfund Site 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; request for public 

comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 

122(i) of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act, as 

amended by the Superfund 

Amendments and Reauthorization Act 

(‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is 

hereby given of a proposed Agreement 

for Recovery of Response Costs 

(‘‘Agreement,’’ Region 9 Docket No. 9–

2006–0025) pursuant to Section 122(h) 

of CERCLA concerning the Denova 

Superfund Site, (the ‘‘Site’’), located in 

Rialto, California. The settling parties 

are Northrup Grumman, Lockheed 

Martin, the Boeing Company, Georgia 

Pacific, BNSF Railway Company, Royal 

Caribbean Cruises, JBL Inc., the 

Marquardt Company, Davis Wire Corp., 

Aerojet-General Corp., the Department 

of Energy (Lawrence Livermore National 

Laboratory), the Department of Energy 

(Sandia National Laboratory), NASA, 

the Department of the Interior and the 

Navy. 

The Agreement compensates EPA and 

the County of San Bernardino 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 28, 2007 / Notices 14553 

Consolidated Fire District for past 

response costs related to the removal 

action taken at the Site. The Agreement 

provides for a total recovery of 

$1,246,160. The Agreement also 

provides the settling parties with 

contribution protection under CERCLA 

section 113(f)(2) for response cost paid 

under the Agreement. 

For thirty (30) days following the date 

of publication of this Notice, the Agency 

will receive written comments relating 

to the proposed Agreement. The 

Agency’s response to any comments 

will be available for public inspection at 

the Agency’s Region IX offices, located 

at 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before April 27, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: The proposed Agreement 

may be obtained from Judith Winchell, 

Docket Clerk, telephone (415) 972–3124. 

Comments regarding the proposed 

Agreement should be addressed to 

Judith Winchell (SFD–7) at United 

States EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 

Street, San Francisco, California 94105, 

and should reference the Denova 

Superfund Site, Rialto, California, and 

USEPA Docket No. 9–2006–0025. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michele Benson, Office of Regional 

Counsel, telephone (415) 972–3918, U.S. 

EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, California 94105. 

Dated: March 13, 2007. 

Keith A. Takata, 

Director, Superfund Division. 

[FR Doc. E7–5664 Filed 3–27–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission 

for Extension Under Delegated 

Authority 

March 21, 2007. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on 

this information collection should 

submit comments by May 29, 2007. If 

you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Allison E. Zaleski, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), Room 

10236 NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, 

(202) 395–6466, or via fax at 202–395–

5167, or via the Internet at 

Allison_E._Zaleski@omb.eop.gov. and to 

Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov, Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC), 

Room 1–B441, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. To submit your 

comments by e-mail send them to: 

PRA@fcc.gov. If you would like to 

obtain or view a copy of this 

information collection after the 60 day 

comment period, you may do so by 

visiting the FCC PRA Web page at: 

http://www.fcc.gov/omd/pra. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection(s) send an e-mail 

to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Judith B. 

Herman at 202–418–0214. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB 

Control No.: 3060–0691. 

Title: Amendment of Parts 2 and 90 of 

the Commission’s Rules to Provide for 

the Use of 200 Channels Outside of the 

Designated Filing Areas in the 896–901 

MHz Bands Allotted to the Specialized 

Mobile Radio Pool, 2nd Order on 

Reconsideration and 7th Report and 

Order for the 900 MHz Specialized 

Mobile Radio Service. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit. 

Number of Respondents: 135 

respondents; 135 responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 2.5 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement, third party 

disclosure requirement and 

recordkeeping requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. 

Total Annual Burden: 220 hours. 

Annual Cost Burden: 34,000. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality. 

Needs and Uses: This collection will 

be submitted as an extension (no change 

in reporting, recordkeeping or third 

party disclosure requirements) after this 

60 day comment period to Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) in order 

to obtain the full three year clearance. 

This information collection contains the 

following reporting, recordkeeping, and 

third party requirements on auction 

winners or licensees: (1) Auction 

winners claiming status as a small 

business to submit detailed ownership 

and gross revenue information 

necessary to determine whether they 

qualify as a small business pursuant to 

Commission rules; (2) licensees who 

transfer licenses within three years to 

maintain a file of all documents and 

contracts pertaining to the transfer; and 

(3) licensees to submit information to 

verify that they meet the coverage 

requirements required by 47 CFR 90.665 

at the three-year coverage benchmark 

and the five-year construction deadline. 

License winners are required to 

maintain certain information to ensure 

compliance with Commission rules. 

Specifically, (1) small business license 

winners are required to maintain a file 

over the license term containing 

ownership and gross revenue 

information necessary to determine 

their eligibility as a small business; and 

(2) licensees who transfer licenses 

within three years are to maintain a file 

of all documents and contracts 

pertaining to the transfer. Furthermore, 

in case a licensee defaults or loses its 

license, the Commission retains the 

discretion to re-auction those licenses. If 

licenses are re-auctioned, the new 

license winners would be required at 

the close of the re-auction to: (1) Submit 

and maintain detailed ownership and 

gross revenue information necessary to 

determine whether they qualify as a 

small business pursuant to Commission 

rules; (2) disclose the term of any joint 

bidding agreements, if any, with other 

auction participants in order to ensure 

the integrity of the market structure; (3) 

for licensees who transfer licenses 

within three years, maintain a file of all 

documents and contracts pertaining to 

the transfer; and (4) submit information 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES