alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 57 (Monday, March 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5384]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 07-028]


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of intent to grant exclusive license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is issued in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(c)(1) 
and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i). NASA hereby gives notice of its intent to 
grant an exclusive license in the United States to practice the 
inventions described and claimed in NASA Case Number LAR-16324-1 
entitled ``Self-Activating System and Method for Alerting When an 
Object or a Person is Left Unattended,'' U.S. Patent Number 6,714,132; 
LAR-16324-2 entitled ``Self-Activating System and Method for Alerting 
When an Object or a Person is Left Unattended,'' U.S. Patent Number 
7,106,203 to MaxTec, Inc. having its principal place of business in 
Wellington, Florida. The patent rights in these inventions have been 
assigned to the United States of America as represented by the 
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The 
prospective exclusive license will comply with the terms and conditions 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

DATES: The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within 
fifteen (15) days from the date of this published notice, NASA receives 
written objections including evidence and argument that establish that 
the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. Competing applications completed and 
received by NASA within fifteen (15) days of the date of this published 
notice will also be treated as objections to the grant of the 
contemplated exclusive license.
    Objections submitted in response to this notice will not be made 
available to the public for inspection and, to the extent permitted by 
law, will not be released under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 
U.S.C. 552.

ADDRESSES: Objections relating to the prospective license may be 
submitted to Patent Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, NASA Langley 
Research Center, MS 141, Hampton, VA 23681-2199, (757) 864-3221 
(phone), (757) 864-9190 (fax).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda B. Blackburn, Patent Counsel, 
Office of Chief Counsel, NASA Langley Research Center, MS 141, Hampton, 
VA 23681-2199, (757) 864-3221; Fax: (757) 864-9190. Information about 
other NASA inventions available for licensing can be found online at 
http://techtracs.nasa.gov/.

    Dated: March 16, 2007.
Keith T. Sefton,
Deputy General Counsel, Administration and Management.
 [FR Doc. E7-5384 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Winton/Graham Series.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                              
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                 
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              
|                                                                                                                                                
|Date: November 7, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 56 (Friday, March 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5324]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-349-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

March 19, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 14, 2007, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 500B, 
to be effective April 2, 2007.
    Columbia also tendered for filing the following non-conforming 
Service Agreement for consideration and approval:

FTS Service Agreement No. 92368, Between Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation and Fortuna Energy, Inc. Dated: March 6, 2007.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80c6c5d2c3cfeeece9eee5d3f5f0f0eff2f4c0e6e5f2e3aee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d89e9d8a9b97b6b4b1b6bd8bada8a8b7aaac98bebdaabbf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5324 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **10 8**  **9**

STUART THOMPSON , P etitioner ,

v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIPBUILDING INCORPORATED; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS , Respondents

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (BRB

- 10

- 0168)

Submitted : August 3 1 , 2011 Decided: September 27, 2011

Before DUNCAN , AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judge s .

Petition dismiss ed by unpublished per curiam opinion

. Gregory E. Camden, MON TAGNA KLEIN CAMDEN LLP, Norfolk, Virginia , for Petitioner

. Jonathan H. Walker, MASON, MASON, WALKER & HEDRICK, PC, Newport News, Virginia , for Respondents

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Stuart Thompson appeals the order of the Benefits Review Board (“the Board”) reversing the decision of the District Director of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs awarding attorney’s fees to Thompson’s counsel from Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding (“the Employer”) and remanding for consideration of Thompson’s liability for attorney’s fees. This

c ourt may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders of the Board. 33 U.S.C. § 921(c) (2006); see Eggers v. Clinchfield Coal Co. , 11 F.3d 35, 38 (4th Cir. 1993) (“The fin ality requirement contained in § 921 encompasses the same concepts as finality in 28 U.S.C. § 1291 [ (2006) ].”). Because the Board did not determine the amount of the attorney’s fees and remanded the case for further proceedings, the Board’s order is not a final order. See John v. Barron , 897 F.2d 1387, 1390 (7th Cir. 1990) (“A n award of attorneys ’ fees which does not fix the amount of the award or specify a formula allowing the amount to be computed is not a final decision within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .”); Dir

. , Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs v. Bath Iron Works Corp. , 853 F.2d 11, 16 (1st Cir. 19 8 8) (holding that “order remanding . . . to an ALJ for further findings is not, in general, immediately appealable under 33 U.S.C. § 921(c)”); Dir

. , O ffice of Workers’ Comp. Programs v. Brodka , 643 F.2d 159, 161 (3d Cir. 1981) (finding appeal premature where Board “made a3 determination of liability for attorney’s fees but . . . remanded the case to the deputy commissioner to determine the amount”).
A ccordingly, we dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

P ETITION DISMISSED
#### William P. Roome *v.*Thomas M. Riley, *Sheriff, et*c

Order granting new trial reversed, with costs. Opinion by BaRnaed, P. J.; GilbeRT, J., dissenting.
SCAD-16-0000354

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE: ROBERT L. GARBETT, ESQ., (Deceased)

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.,

and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Wadsworth,

assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the July 31, 2020 final report,

filed by Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the Office of Disciplinary

Counsel Bradley Tamm, as Successor Trustee, pursuant to Rule 2.20

of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH),

over the legal practice of deceased attorney Robert L. Garbett,

and the record in this matter, we conclude that nothing further

remains to be done in this trusteeship. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Successor Trustee Tamm is

discharged.

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCAD-16-0000354

10-AUG-2020

09:51 AM
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall

close SCAD-16-0000354.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 10, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth 

2
#### FANNY E. MUSGRAVE *v.*JOHN H. SHERWOOD.

*Party wall*— *controversy as to the right to increase its height*— affords *no basis for an extra allowance.*

Appeal by the defendant and by the plaintiff from a judgment recovered on a trial at the Special Term, and also by the plaintiff from an order denying her motion for an additional allowance of costs.

The action was brought to restrain the defendant from increasing the height of a party wall standing upon the premises and between the buildings of the parties.

*476The court at General Term said : “ This case is now before the General Term for the third time. The points upon which the rights and obligations of the parties depend were fully considered upon the appeal from the first judgment recovered in it, by which the plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed. *(Musgrave*v. *Sherwood,*23 Hun, 669.) By that decision the judgment was reversed, and it was concluded upon the findings of fact which had been made that the plaintiff should be allowed to recover. The case has since been tried upon evidence not varying in its material aspects from that given upon the first trial, and similar findings have been adopted by the court as the conclusions warranted by this evidence. ******

*“*There was no sum required or claimed in the action, and no subject-matter involved in it upon which a valuation could be placed for the purpose of an additional allowance of costs, placing the case within the Code of Civil Procedure (§ 3253, sub. 2); and where that may be the character of the action, no allowance under this subdivision can be made. *(Grissler*v. *Stuyvesant,*67 Barb., 81; *People*v. *New York, ele., Ferry Co.,*68 N. Y., 71.)

“ This case, in principle, was very much like that now presented. ‘ The subject-matter involved in the controversy was the right to erect the structure, and not the title to the materials or the value of the erections. The plaintiff claimed no right or property in them ’ (Id., 83); and because that was the nature of the controversy, the allowance which had been made was stricken out. This case is similar in its theory, and may properly be held to be governable by the decision which was then made. The order from which the appeal has been taken by the plaintiff should also be affirmed.”

*Al/mon Goodwin,*for the appellant.

*William A. Beach,*for the respondent.

Opinion'by

Daniels, Jf;

Brady, P. J., concurred.

Present — Brady, P. J., and Daniels, J.

Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure (#25150).                     

*Date/Time:*                         May 3, 2007, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.; May 4, 2007, 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.                     

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 1235, Arlington, VA. The Advisory Committee members will attend virtually.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Deborah White-Wilkins, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8970.                     

If you are attending the meeting and need access to the NSF, please contact the individual listed above so you name may be added to the building access list. 

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice concerning issues related to the oversight, integrity, development and enhancement of NSF's Office of Cyberinfrastructure.                     

*Agenda:*

*May 3, 2007:*

AM: Introductions and Updates—Office of Cyberinfrastructure activities. 

PM: Presentation and Discussion—ACCI Subcommittee meetings and meeting with the Director and Deputy Director, NSF. 

*May 4, 2007:*

AM: Presentation and Discussion—Office of Cyberinfrastructure. 

PM: Discussion—Planning for next meeting; feedback; other business. 

Dated: March 27, 2007. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. E7-5876 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room Wl2-140 

1200 New Jersey A venue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

March 27th, 2016 

·,'• ; "; '' 1 

l' () 

Re: Amendment to exemption 14988 issued pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Reform Act and Part II 

of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA -2015-44 26. 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

Satellite Marketing, Inc. currently holds Exemption Number 14988 issued for the purpose of operating 

unmanned aircraft systems to conduct aerial photography and videography. Satellite Marketing, Inc. 

herby requests an amendment to that exemption to include additional small unmanned aircraft systems 

that fully comply with the conditions of the exemption to support client requests (public interest). 

The following systems (under the same terms and conditions contained in the original exemption) are 

cited below. 

I. DJI Phantom 3 

2. DJI Phantom 4 

3. DJI Inspire 

All of the requested sUAS have been previously approved through the 333 exemption process for other 

organizations, and manuals are on file. Satellite Marketing, Inc. states that no conditions or limitations 

from our original request have changed and all operations of the additional UAS will be in fu~l 

compliance with the terms of the exemption. 

Satellite Marketing, Inc. 

954-651-0537 

FirstCoastDrones@gmail.com 

'. 
: ,._j ,. ' 

·,
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STANLEY PRENTICE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1763

[November 2, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-

006068CF10A.

Stanley Prentice, Blountstown, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard 

Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 4.6
 _________________________
 LOAN AGREEMENT
 _________________________
 Between:
 PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL BRASPETRO BV.  PIB-BV
 And
 WORLD FUND FINANCIAL SERVICES
  1




---



##### 



LOAN AGREEMENT NUMBER: /2008
 The undersigned:
 1 PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL BRASPETRO BV.
  2 WORLD FUND FINANCIAL SERVICES nd
  Whereas :
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 Have agreed as follows:
 Article 1  Loan
 1.1
 1.2
 Bank of America
100 West 33rd Street  4th Floor
New York, NY 10001  USA
 Attention: Paulo Pereira / Alfonso Guevara
Fed ABA: 026009593
Swift: BOFAUS3N
CHIPS ABA: 0959
Account: 6550-7- 23338
Petrobras International Braspetro B.V.  PIB BV
 Article 2  Interest
 2.1
  2




---



##### 



LIBOR  means, in relation to any amount owed by the Borrower in Dollars hereunder on which
interest for a given period is to accrue, the rate per annum to be, with respect to the relevant
Interest Period:
 (a) The arithmetic mean of the offered quotations for LIBOR published by the BBA for such
Interest Period at or about 11.00 a.m. (London time) on the Reset Date for a period of
thirty (30) days.  (b) If such rate is not published by BBA or the BBA ceases to exit or function, the
arithmetic mean of the offered quotation on the Telerate Service Page 3750 (or such other
page as may replace the designated page on the Telerate Service or such other service as
may be nominated by the British Bankers Association) (Telerate Page 3750) at or about
11:00 a.m. (London time) on the Reset Date for such Interest Period.
  2.2
 2.3
 2.4
 2.5
 provided
     Article 3  Term and Accelerated Repayment
 3.1
 3.2
  3




---



##### 



Article 4  Payments
 4.1
 Citibank NY
111th. Wall Street  21st. Floor
New York, NY 10005  USA
 Attention: Federico Baldou Gallo
ABA: 021000089
Swift: CITIUS33
Account: 36222107
World Fund Financial Services
 4.2
 Article 5   Voluntary and Mandatory Prepayments
 5.1 Voluntary Prepayments . Voluntary Prepayment
 5.2 Mandatory Prepayments . Mandatory Prepayment
 Article 6  Termination
 6.1
 6.1.1
 6.1.2
 6.1.3
  4




---



##### 



6.1.4
 6.2
 6.3
       Article 7  Notices
 7.1
 7.2
 nd
 
 Article 8  Waiver
  Article 9  Invalidity
  5




---



##### 



Article 10  Assignment and transfer
  Article 11  Amendments
  Article 12  Governing law and Competent court
 12.1
 12.2
   /s/ Gabriel MarchioneWORLD FUND FINANCIAL SERVICES .By virtue of power of attorney
 /s/ Marcos ZacariasPETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL BRASPETRO BV.  PIB-BVBy virtue of power of attorney
  6




---



##### 



Reset Dates
    
    Period Beginning
    
    Period EndingPeriod 0
    
    28-02-08
    
    29-02-08
    
    31-03-08Period 1
    
    28-03-08
    
    31-03-08
    
    29-04-08Period 2
    
    28-04-08
    
    29-04-08
    
    30-05-08Period 3
    
    29-05-08
    
    30-05-08
    
    30-06-08Period 4
    
    27-06-08
    
    30-06-08
    
    31-07-08
  7