alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10503)

#### The Hipage Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. N-466.

(Decided May 7, 1963)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain merchandise, described on the invoice as “Unglazed Bleached Sulphite Wrapping Paper containing 5/10% Bleached Kraft — 24 x 36 — 20/500.”

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the commodity in question is statutory export value and that such value for the present merchandise is the invoice unit values, less 2 per centum.

Judgment will 'be rendered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2296

DEMIN JIANG, a/k/a De Min Jiang, a/k/a De Ming Jiang,

 Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: July 19, 2011 Decided: August 5, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Brown, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Tony West, 

Assistant Attorney General, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Assistant 

Director, Dawn S. Conrad, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION,

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Demin Jiang, a native and citizen of China, petitions 

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals 

(Board) denying his motion to reopen as untimely and numerically 

barred. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no 

abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Jiang’s motion. 

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly deny the 

petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In 

re: Jiang, (B.I.A. Oct. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT
      23**


**McGladrey
      & Pullen**


**Certified
      Public Accountants**





Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
      Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-3 (No. 333-100981) of our report dated
      March 26, 2007, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Patriot
      National Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.








/S/
      McGladrey & Pullen, LLP





New
      Haven, Connecticut


March
      27,
      2007














McGladrey
        & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International,
 an
        affiliation of separate and independent legal
        entities.
No. 40250.

#### Protest 920747-G of Portland Trawling Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

From the meager record it appeared that the floats and towing chains arrived unaccompanied by complete otter trawl nets. It was held that the burden rested upon the plaintiff to prove that the articles in question are either nets or finished sections of nets as provided in paragraph 1725. On the record presented the protest was overruled. *United States*v. *Schoverling*(146 U. S. 76) cited.
No. 54693.

#### D. Aboudi & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 119245-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400. the court dismissed the protests.
No. 65594.

#### Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/11592 and 60/15458 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Prom a review of the record in these cases, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protests were, therefore, overruled.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1777-1778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-558]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


National Science Board; Commission on 21st Century Education in 
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given of a change in the 
location of a meeting of the National Science Board Commission on 21st 
Century Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. 
The meeting, originally set for January 18, 2007, from 8 a.m.-5 p.m. to 
be held at the Arizona State Capitol, 1700 W. Washington Street, 
Phoenix, AZ 85007 (published in Vol. 71 FR 78227, December 28, 2006) 
will be held at the same time at the Hyatt Regency Phoenix, 122 North 
Second Street, Phoenix, Arizona, USA 85004. Telephone: 602-252-1234
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Purpose of Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is for the 
Commission to discuss its draft recommendations relating to K-12 STEM 
education. A provisional agenda for the meeting will be available at 
http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/edu-com/.
    Contact Person: Dr. Elizabeth Strickland, Commission Executive 
Secretary, National Science Board Office, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,

[[Page 1778]]

Arlington, VA 22230; Phone: 703-292-4527, E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#503523242239333b3c103e23367e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7c2d4d3d5cec4cccbe7c9d4c189c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a>.

Russell Moy,
Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. E7-558 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES P. DORTA, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Peter Murray*and *Miss Cynthia M. Jacob*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Michael B. Imbriani*and *Mr. 8. Philip Klein*for the respondent.

May 28, 1968.

Denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41215 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTONIO MENDEZ, JR Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-1210-ALL Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Antonio Mendez, Jr., has moved for leave towithdrawand has filed a briefin accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mendez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-41215

2 GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
D
**Fairchild Papers**
**Links       to other titles****About this Title**
**Other Fairchild Papers**              - author              index- title              index**Books**              - author              index- title              index**CADRE Papers**              - author              index- title              index**SAASS Theses**              - author index              - title index**Maxwell Papers** *              - index**Wright Flyer Papers** *             - index
* Available as downloads in PDF format only.

Distribution PolicyThe Vital Link: The Tanker's Role in Winning        America's WarsDavid M. Cohen
2001, 67 pages        ISBN 1-58566-088-4        $6.50

order P-16        | download
This paper focuses on the unique and vital capabilities      of the US Air Force's KC-135 tanker fleet. It analyzes historic and current tanker usage,      tanker operational employment, and the capability of today's tanker fleet, with emphasis      on force structure and force management. In light of decreasing budgets, aging airframes,      increase downtime for maintenance, and an explosion in the operations tempo, this paper      proposes a four-pronged methodology addressing tanker vision, organization, training and      employment, as the correction needed to get the KC-135 weapon system back on centerline.      This will allow the tanker to effectively aid the Air Force in successfully deterring      conflict and, if needed, quickly win the nation's future wars.

Next Title |  AU Press Home
**What do think?** E-mail your comments about this      title to Air      University Press
No. 50099.

#### Protests 97789-K, etc., of John H. Frankenberg et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
SMRH:4871-6888-0813.1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0575

RIKKI HELD, et al.,

Plaintiffs / Appellees

v.

STATE OF MONTANA, et al.,

Defendants / Appellants

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE A BRIEF 

AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS/APPELLEES

Pursuant to the Unopposed Motion by Montana Interfaith Power and Light for leave to file 

an Amicus Brief and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Montana Interfaith Power and Light shall have up to and 

including April 3, 2024 to file their Amicus Brief.

Dated _________ __, 2024, 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 21 2024

03/21/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0575
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of ATNG Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 was filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Simpson,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                              /s/ Robert Simpson
                                              -------------------------------
                                              Robert Simpson, Chief Financial
                                              Officer and Treasurer
                                              Date: March 30, 2004
Exhibit 31.8**CERTIFICATION**I, Mark A. Pytosh, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MSW Energy Finance Co. II, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 30, 2006         By:             /s/ Mark A. Pytosh    Mark  A. Pytosh    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
51
Exhibit 23.1     INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT     The Board of Directors Ableauctions.com, Inc.   We consent to the use in the Registration Statements of Ableauction.com, Inc. on Form S-8 and Form S-3 of our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 26, 2007 on the consolidated balance sheet of Ableauctions.com, Inc. as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statement of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows, and stockholders equity for the year then ended.       /s/ TELFORD SADOVNICK, P.L.L.C.CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
       Bellingham, Washington, USA January 25, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8155 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8155

To direct the Secretary of Energy to develop fish and wildlife program 
     funding alternatives to mitigate the cost to Bonneville Power 
           Administration ratepayers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2024

   Mr. Newhouse (for himself, Mr. Fulcher, Mr. Zinke, and Mr. Bentz) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Energy to develop fish and wildlife program 
     funding alternatives to mitigate the cost to Bonneville Power 
           Administration ratepayers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ratepayer Funding Alternative Act''.

SEC. 2. FISH AND WILDLIFE PROGRAM FUNDING ALTERNATIVES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the 
heads of other relevant Federal agencies, shall develop, with respect 
to the fish and wildlife program of the Bonneville Power 
Administration, alternative funding options that do not pass the 
expense of the program on to the power and transmission service 
customers of the Bonneville Power Administration.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to each of 
the Committees on Appropriations for the House of Representatives and 
the Senate a report that describes the alternative funding options 
developed under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Christopher Naughton, the President
and Chief Executive Officer of Marshall Edwards, Inc. (the Company), and
David R. Seaton, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that, to his or her knowledge:



|1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December
31, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of
the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the
Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.               

These certifications accompany the Form 10-Q to which they relate, are not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.

Dated: February 10, 2004

|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Christopher Naughton |  | /s/ David Seaton       
|                         |  |                        
|Christopher Naughton     |  | David R. Seaton        
|Chief Executive Officer  |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Quaker Village, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Landau Brothers Building Company.

Argued March 18, 1969.

April 23, 1969:

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*Robert G. Sable,*with him *Herbert B. Sachs,*and *Basldn, Boreman, Sachs, Gondelman and Graig,*for appellant.

*Loyal H. Gregg,*with him *Thomas Lewis J ones,*and *White, Jones and Gregg,*for appellee.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Orders affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002. In connection with the Quarterly Report of HLI Operating Company, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, James A. Yost, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ JAMES A. YOST   Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
 September 8, 2004
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-Qof Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,2009, I, Martin S. Lapera, President and Chief Executive Officer of FrederickCounty Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)          such Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          the information contained in such Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Frederick CountyBancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ Martin S. Lapera                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Martin S. Lapera                       |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Case No. 18,856.

#### The THALES.

[10 Blatchf. 203.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

Oct. 2, 1872.2

Practice ix Admiralty — Discharge ox Stipulation — Rearuest.

A vessel, which has once been arrested, in the admiralty, and discharged on stipulation for her value, cannot be arrested again, in the admiralty, for the same cause of action.

[Appeal from the district court of the United States for the Southern district of New York.]

In admiralty.

Dennis McMahon, for libellant.

Robert D. Benedict, for claimant.

2

 [Affirming Case No. 13,853.]

WOODRUFF, Circuit Judge.

Upon the proofs, I am of opinion that the advances made in this case, for reimbursement whereof this cause is promoted, were made upon the credit of the owners, on their request, and were not made upon the credit of the vessel. If so, then no lien upon the vessel ever existed.

But, the authorities, cited to the effect that the vessel, having once been arrested and discharged upon stipulation for her value, cannot be proceeded against a second time and arrested again for the same cause of action, seem to me to settle the question, at least in this court. The Union [Case No. 14,346]; The Kalamazoo, 15 Jur. 885, and 9 Eng. Law & Eq. 557, 560; Williams & B. Adm. Prac. 211, and cases cited. I must, therefore, direct a dismissal of the libel, in affirmance of the decree below. [Case No. 13,855.]