alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1





            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our report dated February 27, 2004, accompanying the financial
statements of Monterey Bay Tech. Inc. (formerly Aladdin Systems Holdings, Inc.)
(the "Company") included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Company's previously filed Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-46712, effective September 27, 2000).


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

San Francisco, California
April 13, 2005


                                       46
April 27, 1945

No. 50152.

#### Petition 6381-R of *Cahn Bros. & Ryder, Inc.*v. *United States.*

Petitioner’s application for rehearing granted.
(Reap. Dec. 8725)

#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 792992; 825829; 862864.

(Decided January 10, 1957)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated in Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, was exported from Japan.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation of such merchandise to the United States the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets from the country in which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, was the net invoice price, packing included.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for consumption in the country of exportation.

> *566IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Re-appraisement set forth in Schedule A may be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the net invoice price, packing included.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I, Abdul Ladha, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ableauctions.com, Inc., certify that:



I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ableauctions.com, Inc.



Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.



Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report.



I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):



(i)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(ii)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.









Dated:  March 31, 2006





/s/ Abdul Ladha

______________________________________

Abdul Ladha,

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6168

COLECO TAYLOR BEST,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TRAVIS R. SPARKS; MATT MILLER; CHUCK ARNOLD; AARON CANTWELL; 

JERIMEE HOOKER; DEPUTY HOWELL; CHRIS WORTH; MICHAEL DAWSON; 

BRIAN DAWSON; CHARLES SHAEFFER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:13-ct-03140-FL)

Submitted: March 27, 2014 Decided: April 1, 2014

Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Coleco Taylor Best, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Coleco Taylor Best appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as frivolous his civil rights complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Best v. 

Sparks, No. 5:13-ct-03140-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2014). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Served: October 20, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------

CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On October 6, 2010, Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. (“Chautauqua”), a U.S. certificated air carrier,1

requested that the Department register the trade name “United Express” for use in certain air 

transportation operations. 

Part 215 (14 CFR Part 215) of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing 

to use an alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule 

further states that the Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification 

to similarly named air carriers of the proposed use of the name. In this case, Chautauqua states 

that it currently operates under the trade name “Continental Express,” and in light of the recent

merger of United Air Lines Inc. (“United”) and Continental Airlines, Inc. (“Continental”), 

Chautauqua requires flexibility to operate as a United Express air carrier as well. Chautauqua

further states it has notified United of the proposed use of the United Express trade name.

We note that Chautauqua states that United will make all required disclosures of the identity of 

the operating air carrier and trade name in accordance with the provisions of Part 257 of the 

Department’s regulations (14 CFR Part 257). In addition, Chautauqua states that the aircraft to 

be used to operate service on behalf of United will clearly indicate that Chautauqua is the 

operating carrier. 

Since Chautauqua has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the

registration of the trade name “United Express” for immediate use in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C., October 20, 2010.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov

 

1 Chautauqua’s interstate certificate was last reissued by Order 2004-11-1, on November 4, 2004.
Attachment A 

SERVICE LIST FOR CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES, INC.

 MR PATRICK R RIZZI

 COUNSEL FOR CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES INC 

 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

 555 THIRTEENTH STREET

 WASHINGTON DC 20004

 

MR BERNARD STANKUS RTS-42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR BRUCE RABINOVITZ

WILMER HALE

1875 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW 

WASHINGTON DC 20006

MR WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

 MR R BRUCE KEINER

 CROWELL AND MORING LLP

 1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW

 WASHINGTON DC 20004

 

MR PETER LYNCH 

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT 

FAA/AGC-300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

 

 MR CLAY MORITZ

 OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

 DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

 1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

 WASHINGTON DC 20590
Nov, 14. 2008 12;28PM michael a, pizzi j r, "\ 4301 P. 2 

V • 

FAA PART 16 AlHPORT PROCEEPINGS DOCKET 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. 16-08-05 

ALCA, Inc., Cylinder Shop, Inc., 

Suncoast Aviation, Aircraft Parts 

and National Aviation, 

Complainants, 

vs. 

Miami-Dade County, Florida 

Respondent. 

/ COPY 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FHLE REPLY BRIEF 

Petitioners, hereby file this Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief 

and in support thereof would show: 

1. Petitioners have filed a Part 16 Complaint against Miami Dade County; 

2. The County filed its response after a several month delay and 

received a several month time extension; 

3. On October 7» 20Q8> undersigned counsel assumed duties as Mayor of Miami 

Lakes in Dade County and has been required to spend much of October 2008 

assuming those duties; 

4. Undersign counsel had sought extensions in all of his pending r^ses, until 

sometime in early mid November, due to these circumstances; 

5. There have been some changes in the status of the parties within the past 

thirty (30) days that need to be accounted for in preparing a reply; 

6. A final extension on a matter of this importance, will not prejudice a reply; 
Jov. 14. 2008 12:28P M michae l a, pizz i j r, ^' r 4301 P. 3 

7. This matter involves multiple parties and ongoing development issues that 

have decades of history; 

8. The reply is the petitioners fmal opportunity to document their complaints; 

9. Undersigned counsel spoke with the assistant County attorney, David 

Murray, who indicated the County does not oppose an extension of time until 

December 1,2008, for the petitioners to file their reply brief; 

10. Petitioners are requesting until December 1,2008, to file their reply brief. 

WBEREFORE: undersign counsel and petitioners request an extension of up until 

December 1,2008 to submit their reply brief in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

MICHAEL A. PIZZI, Jr., P.A. 

Attorney for Defendant 

15271 NW 60* Avenue 

Miami Lakes, Fl 33016 

Phone: 305 2312121 

FAX: 305 2312123 

E-mail: mplzzijr(@,yahoQ.com 

By:_ 

Michael A. Pizzi, Jr., Esq 

Florida Bar No. 079545 
lov. 14. 2008 12:28PM michael a. pizzi Jr. '^.430 1 P. 4 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the above Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Reply Brief was mailed to: 

OfQce of the Chief Counsel 

Attn: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings 

Docket 16-08-05 

Room 925, Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Jennifer Trock, Esq* 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP 

2300 N. Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20037 

David Murray, Esq. 

County Attorney 

P.O. Box 025504 

Miami, FL 33102-5504 

By: 

Michael A. Pizzi, Jr., Esq.
March 27, 1952

No. 56514. Suit 4680.

#### Loewenthal Trimming Corp. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1314 affirmed January 29, 1952. C. A. IX 477.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 USC, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pacific Fuel Cell
Corp. (the Registrant or the Company);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedure to be designed under my supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant
(including its consolidated subsidiaries), is made known to me by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluations; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
Audit Committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Dated: April 12, 2008
    /s/ George SuzukiGeorge Suzuki, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

Inconnection with the Form 10-Q of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. forthe quarter ended June 30, 2010, I, Martin S. Lapera, President andChief Executive Officer of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc., hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)          such Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          the information contained insuch Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofFrederick County Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/  Martin S. Lapera                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Martin  S. Lapera                      |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Before the Third Division,

April 16, 1945

No. 50129.

#### Protests 57836-K (B), etc., of J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the portions of cheese packed in boxes, except one portion known as Tilsit, are similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *Gruyere Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 171, C. D. 562) and *Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(10 id. 271, C. D. 767). In accordance therewith the merchandise, except the portion which is known as Tilsit, was held dutiable as claimed.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Kappa Holding B.V. (the “Company”) for the year ended December31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of such officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)            the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)            the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof the operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  G.P.F. BEURSKENS |                           | /s/  H. WAGTER |
|--------|----------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------|
|   | Name:                      | G.P.F.  Beurskens              |                | Name: | H.Wagter |
|   | Title:                     | President /  Managing Director |                | Title: | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | Date:                      | 8 July 2003                    |                | Date: | 8 July 2003 |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Kappa Holding B.V. and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 31.2 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I,Stephen A. Aanderud, Chief Financial Officer of DayStar Technologies, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DayStar Technologies, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2005; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 13, 2005 

 

/s/ Stephen A. Aanderud

Stephen A. Aanderud

Chief FinancialOfficer