alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SERVE D SEPTEMBE R27 , 201 0

. , J^rlARTMEN TO F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N •''''--n^SWrS u

OFFIC E O FHEARING S ' ' "- ' ^ ' '-'^•^"UN S WASHINGTON , D C ., Q ,, , . ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ IN TH E MATTERO F CARLIL E TRANSPORTATIO N SYSTEM S FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10AL000 3 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO . FAA-2010-078 9

NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designateda s Cas e Numbe r 2009AL700129 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r

person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Ronni e A . Yoder Chie f Administrativ e L; Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10AL000 3 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suite 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Ro y L . Longacre , Respondent' s Counse l Longacre Law Offices , Ltd . 42 5 GStreet , Suit e 91 0 Anchorage , A K

9950 1 TEL : 907-276-635 4 FAX : 907-279-468 5 HowardL . Martin , Jr. , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Alaskan Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 22 2 W . 7 * Avenu e #1 4 Anchorage , A L99513-758 7 TEL : 907-271-526 9 FAX ; 907-271-280 0 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
steam

_ record - Re: Request for extension for Da y ton Power and Li g ht, JM Stuart Station for USEPA ICR received on June 18, 2010

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely,

-----"McCann, Harry" <Harry.McC ann@DPLINC.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "McCann, Harry" <H arry.McCann@DPLINC.com> From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "McCann, Harr y " <Harr y .McCann @ DPLINC.com> Date: 7/14/2010 6:08 AM Sub j ect: Re: Request for extension for Dayton Power and Light, JM Stuart Station for USEPA ICR received on June 18, 2010 Attachments: im g -713132643-0001.pdf Pa g e 1 of 2

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3D5461DO

...
Exhibit 10.8


 







Venaxis, Inc.


 


Non-Employee Director Compensation


 



	
Type of Compensation

	
Amount


	
Monthly Cash Retainer for Non-Employee Directors

	
$  1,000


	
Stock Option Awards

	
(1)


	
Other Compensation

	
(2)












 


___________________


 



	
(1)

	
Non-employee directors typically receive a stock option award upon joining the Board, that is two times the annual grant, and then typically receive annual grants, which may be pro-rated in the first year after joining the Board.  In 2014 the annual grant was stock options to acquire 34,000 shares of common stock.  The non-executive Chair of the Board typically receives an annual grant that is 150% of the non-employee director annual grant.







 



	
(2)

	
Directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*The New York Medical College and Hospital for Women, *Respondent, v.*Allan Campbell, *as Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant.*

Order affirmed, without costs. Opinion by Daniels, J.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 3, 2006

Before

 Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

 Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

 Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

No. 04-2652

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

COSME MALDONADO-CERNA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division

No. 03 CR 920-1

Ronald A. Guzmán,

Judge.

O R D E R

Cosme Maldonado-Cerna was sentenced to 77 months in prison for illegal

reentry of the United States as an aggravated felon, see 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). 

He appealed, arguing that the district court plainly erred by sentencing him under

the formerly mandatory regime. See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005);

United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 481 (7th Cir. 2005). We remanded to ask

whether the judge would have imposed a lesser sentence had he known that the

guidelines were advisory, see Paladino, 401 F.3d at 483–84. He answered that he

would. Consequently, we VACATE Maldonado-Cerna’s sentence and REMAND for

resentencing.

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-4290

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus MESURON D. TAYLOR, a/k/a Mezy, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (CR-04-250) Submitted: August 10, 2005 Decided: August 23, 2005 Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Audrey Freeman jaCobs, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Matthew C. Ackley, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mesuron D. Taylor, a.k.a. “Mezy,” appeals his thirty-four month term of imprisonment following his guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). Taylor contends that the district court clearly erred in applying a four-level enhancement for possession of a firearm “with knowledge, intent, or reason to believe that it would be used or possessed in connection with another felony offense” pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1(b)(5) (2004). We find no error and affirm Taylor’s sentence. “When reviewing the District Court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines, . . . [w]e accept the findings of fact of the District Court unless they are clearly erroneous and give due deference to the District Court’s application of the guidelines to the facts.” United States v. Cutler , 36 F.3d 406, 407 (4th Cir. 1994). Our review of the record reveals that Taylor and three others attempted to confront the individual responsible for the theft of a companion’s firearm. Testimonial evidence supported a finding that after some discussion on the necessity of being armed for the confrontation, Taylor retrieved a firearm in order to “go shoot his ass.” Police intercepted Taylor and his three companions prior to their arrival at their intended destination. A firearm was recovered from the vehicle. Because evidence supported the district court’s factual conclusions, we find that the district- 3 - court did not clearly err in its application of the challenged enhancement. Accordingly, we affirm Taylor’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1
                                  ------------

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, James E. Solomon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of TechAlt, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

March 30, 2005


/s/ James E. Solomon
--------------------
James E. Solomon
Chairman & CEO
(V. D. 61)

Entry No. 869020, etc.

#### Astra Trading Corp. et al. *v.*United States

(Decided December 20, 1957)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*537Oliveb, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *Astra Trading Corp. et al.*v. *United States,*37 Cust. Ct. 433, Abstract 60401. The conclusion therein, and the judgment issued pursuant thereto, was to the effect that the protests had been prematurely filed and the matter was remanded to a single judge in reappraisement to determine the proper dutiable values in the manner provided by law. (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).)

A stipulation of submission, upon which the matter is now before me, establishes export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the microscopes and cases in question, and that such statutory value for each class of articles is as set forth in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 56045.

protests 133310-K, etc. (New York).

#### Emil Bernhard et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 10180)

#### Gitkin Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 837176, etc.

(Decided February 27, 1962)

*Barnes, Richardson & OoTburn*for the plaintiff.

*William 3. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in the attached schedule “A,” for decision upon stipulation reading as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise and the issues involved in the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Gitkin Co.,*A.R.D. 132, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 2. That at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual *572wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values, less the amounts described on the invoices under the heading “Actual Charges”; and that at the said time of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers for home consumption in the country of exportation.

On tlie agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as it existed prior to the amendment thereof by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, or as defined in section 402a (d) of the said act, as so amended (according to the date of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, of the involved merchandise for consumption) , to be the proper basis for the determination of the values of the involved merchandise and that such values were the appraised values, less the amounts described on the invoices under the heading “Actual Charges.”

Judgment will issue accordingly.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 858 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the use of Federal funds 

for the salaries or expenses of political employees if the President’s 

annual budget submission to Congress is late, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2023 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia (for himself and Ms. MACE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the use 

of Federal funds for the salaries or expenses of political 

employees if the President’s annual budget submission 

to Congress is late, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Presidential Account5 ability for Yearly Submission of The United States’ Budg6 et Act’’ or the ‘‘PAYSTUB Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 858 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR PO2 LITICAL EMPLOYEE SALARIES AND EX3 PENSES IF PRESIDENT’S BUDGET IS LATE. 

4 Section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(j)(1) If the budget under subsection (a) is not sub7 mitted to Congress on or before the first Monday in Feb8 ruary of a year, during the period beginning on the first 

9 Tuesday of February of such year and ending on the date 

10 the budget is submitted, no Federal funds may be obli11 gated or expended for the salary or expenses of any polit12 ical employee. 

13 ‘‘(2) Each political employee whose salary and ex14 penses are not paid by operation of paragraph (1) shall 

15 be paid for the period the limitation under such subsection 

16 was in effect at the employee’s standard rate of pay, at 

17 the earliest date possible after such period ends, regardless 

18 of scheduled pay dates. 

19 ‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘political employee’ 

20 means any individual— 

21 ‘‘(A) occupying a position described under sec22 tions 5312 through 5316 of title 5 (relating to the 

23 Executive Schedule); 

24 ‘‘(B) serving under a noncareer appointment in 

25 the Senior Executive Service, as defined under para26 graph (7) of section 3132(a) of such title; or 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 858 IH

1 ‘‘(C) occupying a position in the executive 

2 branch of the Government of a confidential or pol3 icy-determining character under schedule C of sub4 part C of part 213 of title 5, Code of Federal Regu5 lations.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 07/18/2015

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Biennial of the Americas – Natural Resources Clinica on 07/17/2015

SUMMARY: 

Laura Farris participated in a panel discussion on 07/17/2015 on the Clean Power Plan at the 

Biennial of the Americas. The meeting was held in Denver, Colorado. The Clean Power Plan was 

proposed on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Laura Farris, EPA Region 8

Other Stakeholders

First Name Last Name Organization

Sebastian Africano Trees, Water & People

Tom Bogdan UCAR- University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

William Boyd Climate and Forests Task Force, University of Colorado Boulder

James Eklund Colorado Water Conservation Board

Linda Escalante Natural Resources Defense

Russ George Boettcher Foundation

Jon Goldin-Dubois Western Resource Advocates

Liliana Gutierrez NOS

Kelly Latham Water for People

Brian McPeek The Nature Conservancy

Craig Patrick Summit Mining International Inc.

Tim Prewitt IDE: International Development Enterprises

Chris Sabatini Columbia University and Global Americans

Jenna Saldaña

Harris Sherman Arnold & Porter, LLP

Carlos Urmeneta IDE: International Development Enterprises

Anna Zawisza Alliance for Sustainable Colorado
No. 38925.

#### Protest 821138-G of Jordan Marsh Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was shown that the books in question are of bona fide foreign authorship. The claim at 15 percent under paragraph 1410 was therefore sustained. *United States*v. *Field*(14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 376, T. D. 42031) cited.
### 00334042 010214518 AUC 85 12-28 UJSA 1 > 3370 RECJBO : 005550 CIJIIPRA 

### HEIR : 

# TOTAL CREDIBAMCf 12 de Noviembre de 2015 

### 1211112015 06:03:20 

### Ron Levy

SPUUOLC65 HOTEL AND I NO ROYAl ll 0 

### lER: OOOY3923
CR CUOJAS: 01 03/19 

### RRN: 006133 

### AU!: 

### IS013l 1209, 469 

# $209, 469 us 420943750 015 Hab.No.l Room No

. 

### : 0510 No. Personas 

### I Pax : 

### 1 No. Reserva I Conf No: 

### 20498908 nH COLLECTI ON BOGOTA • ROYAL ..\NOINO NIT : 8 0 0.241.641-7 Hotel

Andino Royal S A S. 

### Factura de ventalnvoice No

. 

### Cajero I Cashier 

### Pagina No. 

### 1 1 Page No. 

### : 193016 Cod. Credito

. AIRNo.

.

: Carlos Andres Jimenez

**SUJEIO** 

### A

**UE~IFICACION** DE 

### lA DIAN LEUY/RON Cl'iptograua: 

### 6Af3CA7DBA5AS8J[ 

### o/o Valor Credltos Credits



### IUR : 8080008000 lSI : 6800 AID AOOOOOOOOJ1010 

### UISA DEBIJ ) 

### idas AguaRoyal 16% 

### 204,869 4,600

i ' !

! **~**

•. '

# l

f!lll!• **~t** oil



## '

" '•"·.

I · 

# .. , Base lmpoconsumo 

### 8 o/o lngreso gravado para Tare 

### 8 o/o Base 2 gravada 16 

### o/o lngreso gravado para Ter 16% Total Base Gravable Exentos Excluldos Terceros 

### 0 

### 0 3,966 

### 0 3,966 

### 0 0 0 Total= 

### 209,469 IMPOCONSUMO 8% IVA16% 

### Total lmpuestos Total 

### 209,469 209,469 

### 0 205,503 205,503 

### 0.00

FIRMA 

### Da HUESPED 

### I GUEST SIGNATURE 

### * Paquete Turistico : lncluye Alojamiento+ Internet +3 mlnutos por
dia

de llamadas naclonales o lntemacionales

La presente factura se asirrila en todos sus efectos a Ia letra de cani:lio Art.774 del C6digo de Comercio. Facturaci6n por Sistema de Co111Jutador Art.617 E T

. en el software del Hotel Andino RoyalS A S. Autorizaci6n

de numeraci6n de facturaci6n DIAN 

### No. 320001191481 de 02/10/2014 desde 184650 hasta el200000 Somos Autorretenedores

Res.3194 27/05/1997.No somos grandes contribuyentes Actividad

ICA 5511 13.8 x 1 OOO.IV A Regimen Corrlln.Facturaci6n en pesos Coloni:lianos

. Calle 85 

### No 12-28- Bogota, Coloni:lia.

Tel:

(57) 1-6513100- Fax : (57) 1-6513090 Reservas : (57) 1-6513092 E-mail: nhcollectionroyalandino@nh-hotels.com

Si esta factura se cancela fuera de Ia fecha lirrite, se liquidara interes de mora aplicando Ia tasa vigente en este periodo

.
Exhibit 21



Subsidiaries of Ableauctions.com, Inc.



Unlimited Closeouts Inc.

Ojai, California

Icollector International, Ltd.

Fife, Washington

Ableauctions.com (Washington) Inc.

Fife, Washington

iTrustee.com International, Ltd.

Fife, Washington



Our operations in Canada include:

0716590 B.C. Ltd.

Coquitlam, British Columbia

Jarvis Industries Ltd.

Coquitlam, British Columbia

Icollector.com Technologies, Ltd.

Coquitlam, British Columbia

Rapidfusion Technologies Inc.

Coquitlam, British Columbia

0723074 B.C. Ltd.

Coquitlam, British Columbia

Stanford Development Corporation

Coquitlam, British Columbia



























---
117 STAT. 10 PUBLIC LAW 108–6—FEB. 13, 2003

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 16 (S. 101):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):

Jan. 8, considered and passed House.

Jan. 30, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–6

108th Congress

An Act

To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United States for

fiscal year 2003.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR FEDERAL

JUSTICES AND JUDGES.

Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97–92, Justices and

judges of the United States are authorized during fiscal year 2003

to receive a salary adjustment in accordance with section 461 of

title 28, United States Code.

Approved February 13, 2003.

28 USC 461 note.

Feb. 13, 2003

[H.R. 16]
#### JANE A. JERNIGAN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. LAKEHURST MOTORS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Argued March 6, 1967

Decided March 20, 1967.

*Mr. Isidor Xalisch*argued the cause for appellant.

*Mr. Roy G. Simmons*argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. *Gamp & Simmons,*attorneys).

Per. Ctjriam.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case in which the Division, the County Court, and the Appellate Division agreed that the petitioner was entitled to prevail. We granted certification 47 *N. J.*567 (1966). Upon consideration of the matter, we are of the view that the judgment should not he disturbed. It is accordingly affirmed.

*For*affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—7.

*For*reversal—None.