alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BUELL v. KANAWHA LUMBER CORPORATION. Appeal of ELIZABETH LAND & LUMBER CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

February 27, 1911.)

No. 982.

Judicial Sales (§ 27*) — Compliance with Bid — Defective Title.

A purchaser at a judicial sale should not be compelled to comply with Ms bid, where he was given reasonable time to investigate the title, whore the prevailing practice recognized his right to show defects in the title, and where it appears that there were defects in some of the litios to the lands sold.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Judicial Sales, Cent. Dig. §§ 97-99, 101-303; Dee. Dig. § 27.*]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston.

íiction by one Buell against the Kanawha Lumber Corporation. From a decree adjudging insufficient its return to a.rule to show cause why a sale should not be complied with, the Elizabeth Land & Lumber Company appeals.

Modified and remanded.

M. C. Woods and John N. Sebrell, Jr., for appellant.

F. L. Willcox (Willcox & Willcox, on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOFF, Circuit Judge, and DAYTON and CONNOR, District Judges.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that there was error in the decree complained of, in adjudging as not sufficient the return of the appellant to the rule to show cause why the sale involved in this proceeding should not be complied with. It is quite apparent that there were defects in some of the titles to the lands sold, and as the purchaser had been given reasonable time to investigate said titles, and as the practice under the procedure in the district óf South Carolina recognizes the right of a purchaser to show defects in title, and, if shown, to be excused from com]dying with the purchase, we think the appellant should not have been decreed to comply with its bid. It follows that the order of the court forfeiting the sum of $5.000, which had been deposited by appellant in order to authorize it to bid at the sale referred to, should be set aside.

We think the decree complained of should he modified in that respect. As a matter of course, said decree in all other of its provisions will stand confirmed. Remanded, with directions to proceed as herein indicated.

Modified.
No. 52674.

protest 77831-K (New York).

#### Germaine Monteil, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that thq currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to
 **18
U.S.C. Section 1350**
  **As
Adopted Pursuant to**
  **Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
  
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Diamond Powersports, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lisa Elliott,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:
 
 (2)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 April 15,
2005
 
 
 
 
 
 By:  /s/
Lisa Elliott
 Lisa
Elliott, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32** **.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Geoffrey Alison, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of TRAVEL HUNT HOLDINGS, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
      that:





1.
      The
      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31,
      2008
      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
      this **** 10th
      day
      of March, 2008.




*/s/
              Geoffrey
              Alison*Geoffrey
              AlisonChief
              Executive
              Officer and Chief Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      TRAVEL HUNT HOLDINGS, INC. and will be retained by TRAVEL HUNT HOLDINGS, INC.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### Casol Justice v. State.

178 So. 837.

Division A.

Opinion filed October 28, 1937.

*T. Franklin West,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Tyrus A. Nor-wood,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of Glen Pendleton. The plaintiff in error here and Glen Pendleton were indicted and tried together for the same offense. The judgment in this case should be affirmed upon authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Glen Pendleton, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Florida, Defendant in Error, filed this Term.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and-judgment.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 26, 2007, Stepan 
Company, Natural Products Dept., 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New 
Jersey 07607, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cocaine (9041).............................  II
Ecgonine (9180)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail 
should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, 
Washington, DC 20537; or any being sent via express mail should be sent 
to DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/
ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must 
be filed no later than May 29, 2007.

    Dated: March 19, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-5509 Filed 3-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Balanced Series.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                         
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                             
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                           
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                            
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: May 14, 2008
EX 31.1



Amended Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of INFe-Human Resources, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Arthur Viola, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of INFe-Human Resources, Inc.;



2.Based on my knowledge, this amended report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this amended report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this amended report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



October 31, 2006



/s/  ARTHUR VIOLA

________________________

Arthur Viola

Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)

**Title:** Profile of the foreign-born population inthe United States

 
1997, 2000

 
SuDoc Number: C 3.186/39:
Item Number: 0142-C-29(online)
CGP system Number:00551466
Exhibit 10.28

 

ADDENDUM TO ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

This Addendum (the “Addendum”) is entered into effective as of January 1, 2015, by and between NORTH CAROLINA RADIATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC., a North Carolina limited liability company (“MANAGEMENT SERVICES”) and RADIATION THERAPY ASSOCIATES OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, P.A., a North Carolina professional corporation (the “PA”). This Addendum amends Section 3.1 of the Administrative Services Agreement dated January 1, 2002 between the parties (the “Agreement”) to update and revise reference to CPT codes that comprise external beam treatments for purposes of computing the monthly Service Fee and replaces the Addendum of that same Section dated July 1, 2014. The parties acknowledge that Management Services neither provides direct marketing services currently under the Agreement nor does this Amendment provide for Management Services to provide direct marketing services.

 

From and after the date hereof, Section 3.1 shall read as follows:

 

3.1.   Service Fee.   For the services to be provided hereunder by MANAGEMENT SERVICES, the PC shall pay to MANAGEMENT SERVICES a monthly Service Fee at the rate of $625.00 per external beam treatment billed (currently including, but not limited to CPT codes 0073T; 58999, V; 77001-26, 77002-26, 77021, 77021-26, 77300-59, 77336-59, 77372 – 77373, 77385 – 77386, 77401 – 77416, 77418, 77421, 77424 – 77424, 77600, 77605, 77610, 77615, 77620, 99144 – 99145, 99149, A9606, A9699, G0339 – G0340, and G6003 – G6016). The parties agree that the Service Fee represents the fair market value of the services provided by MANAGEMENT SERVICES hereunder and that the parties shall meet annually to reevaluate the value of services provided by MANAGEMENT SERVICES and shall establish the fair market value thereof for purposes of this Section 3.1.

 

 

	
Accepted:
    	
NORTH   CAROLINA RADIATION THERAPY
    
	
 
    	
MANAGEMENT   SERVICES, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   
    	
/s/   JOSEPH BISCARDI
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Joseph   Biscardi
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Assistant   Treasurer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Accepted:
    	
RADIATION   THERAPY ASSOCIATES OF
    
	
 
    	
WESTERN   NORTH CAROLINA, P.A.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   
    	
/s/   DANIEL E. DOSORETZ, M.D.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Daniel   E. Dosoretz, M.D.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Vice   President
December 8 , 2011



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KENNETH LEE WILLIAMS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 01025

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be certified below for

observa nce.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 23

- 12848

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________

WILLIAM P. BROWN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus JOHN DOES, et al.,

Defendants,

NAPHCARE, Individual and Official Capacity, TECHCARE, Individual and Official Capacity, ADVENT CARE, In their individual and professional capacity, USCA11 Case: 23-12848 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 10/13/2023 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 23

- 12848

ADVENT HEALTH CARE, Individual and Official Capacity,
CHAD CHRONIS TER, Sheriff, Hillsborough County, in hisindividual and Professional Capacity,

Defendants

- Appellees.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:23

- cv

- 00141

- WFJ

- AEP

____________________
Before B RANCH , L UCK , and A BUDU , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction. William Brown, a state prisoner proceeding pro se , appeals from the district court’s order dismissing claims against three named defendants. The order is not final and appealable, however,because the district court has not yet resolved the rights and liabilities of Sheriff Chad Chronister and the unnam ed correctional officers and did not certify its order for immediate appeal. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal , 22 F.4th 979, 986 (11th Cir. 2022); Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant , 689 F.3d 1244, 12 46 (11th Cir. 2012). USCA11 Case: 23-12848 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 10/13/2023 Page: 2 of 323

- 12848 Opinion of the Court 3
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 23-12848 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 10/13/2023 Page: 3 of 3
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WILLIAM D. MAPLE, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

17 USCMA 279, 38 CMR 77

No. 20,313

November 17, 1967

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent, Captain Paul V. Melodía, Captain John Kagel,*and *Captain Anthony F. Cilluffo*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel David Rarick, Major John F. Webb, Jr.,*and *Captain Harvey L. Anderson*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

The accused was convicted of involuntary manslaughter, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 119, 10 USC § 919, and sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, total forfeitures, confinement at hard labor for three years, and reduction. Despite evidence of long and honorable prior service, good character, and receipt of letters of commendation, the law officer gave no instructions on punishment beyond the maximum limitations thereon and the mechanics of voting.

Under the circumstances of this case and in light of the near maximum sentence imposed, the failure to provide adequate sentence instructions was prejudicially erroneous. United States v Wheeler, 17 USCMA 274, 38 CMR 72, this day decided.

The decision of the board of review is reversed and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. The board may reassess the sentence or order a rehearing thereon.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-570]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP04-98-002]


Indicated Shippers v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice 
of Compliance Filing

January 10, 2007.
    Take notice that on January 5, 2007, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following pro forma tariff 
sheets:

Second Revised Sheet No. 235
First Revised Sheet No. 236
Original Sheet No. 237

    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83c5c6d1c0ccedefeaede6d0f6f3f3ecf1f7c3e5e6f1e0ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="55131007161a3b393c3b30062025253a272115333027367b323a23">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-570 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case No. 15,106.

#### UNITED STATES v. FITTON.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 658.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1835.

Witness—Assault and Battery upon Wife.

Upon "an indictment against the husband for assault and battery of his wife, she may be examined as a witness against him.

[Followed in U. S. v. Smallwood, Case No. 16,316.]

This was an indictment [against Thomas Fitton] for an alleged cruel assault and battery of the defendant’s wife.

Mr. Key, for the United States,

offered the wife as a witness against her husband.

Mr. Mason, for defendant,

objected; but

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

(nem. con.) permitted her to be sworn and examined. See McNal. Ev. e. 16, pp. 160-176; 3 Chit. Cr. Law, 819; 1 Starkie, Ev. 84, 85, 705, 706; Davis v. Dinwoody, 4 Term R. 678; 2 Russ. 604, and the cases there cited. The wife’s testimony was slightly corroborated, but strongly discredited by evidence of her'habits and conduct.

Verdict for the defendant.