alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Frontier Fund.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                            
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                              
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                               
|Brent Bales                                                                                                   
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 12, 2009
EXHIBIT 6

CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

Rio Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd. (the registrant) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, John Hick, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Dated: March 30, 2005

/s/ John Hick___________________John Hick
Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

Rio Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd. (the registrant) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Omar Gomez, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2,

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Dated: March 30, 2005

/s/ Omar Gomez__________________
Omar Gomez
Chief Financial Officer
446 A.2d 696

#### Munns-Stromple Assoc., Appellant v. Prudential Insurance Co.

Submitted November 13,1980.

Elmer S. Beatty, Jr., for appellant; H. Woodruff Turner, for appellees.

Before PRICE, CAVANAUGH and HOFFMAN, JJ.

The order entered April 2,1980 is affirmed on the comprehensive opinion of the Honorable Joseph A. Del Sole.
Before the Third Division,

April 2, 1945

No. 50092.

#### Petition 6347-R of William J. Oberle, Inc. (Blumenthal Print Works) (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The office manager of the petitioner testified that the merchandise was entered at the'invoice price; that the Government examiner indicated that he obtained what he considered to be the proper price from a price list furnished by the Customs Information Exchange in New York; that the importer found out that said price included an item of commission; and that it was the belief of the importer that the proper dutiable price was that shown on the invoice. A supervising customs agent, who testified as to the reputation of the petitioner, admitted on cross-examination that in his dealings with the petitioner no information was ever denied him and that they cooperated in all of his investigations on their account. The court held that the petitioner honestly believed that the appraiser’s figures were incorrect in that they included an item of commission which the petitioner considered no part of the proper dutiable value of the goods, and that in making entry there was no intent to defraud the Government or deceive its officials. The petition was therefore granted.
Before the Second Division,

December 27, 1938

No. 40231.

#### Protest 179409-G of John Wanamaker (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that the merchandise in question consists of embroidered wearing apparel in part of braid, trimming, or lace, similar to that involved in *Glemby’s*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 32
                                   ----------

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of TechAlt, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"),  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  James E. Solomon,  Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company and James Hurley,  Chief Financial  Officer of
the Company,  respectively,  do each hereby certify,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ James E. Solomon
-----------------------
James E. Solomon
Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2005




/s/ James Hurley
-----------------------
James Hurley
Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2005

[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to TechAlt, Inc. and will be retained by TechAlt, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
No. 58109.

protests 193891-K, etc. (Boston).

#### W. N. Proctor Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
No. 64210.

protest 59/17168 (New York).

#### Eastern Commission Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*476Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all materia! respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 49250.

#### Protest 106752-K of Lun Tai & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was assessed and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5 (chemical compounds). The protest was sustained to this extent.
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ANITA MENDELSON,
Claimant

- Appellant,

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 7030

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 13

- 1594, Chief Judge Bruce E.
Kasold.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Anita Mendelson moves without opposition to wit hdraw her appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. Case: 14-7030 Document: 23 Page: 1 Filed: 11/20/2014MENDELSON v. MCDONALD 2

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

s21

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 20, 2014 Case: 14-7030 Document: 23 Page: 2 Filed: 11/20/2014
#### Southern Paint Mfg. Co., Inc., v. Myrtle O. Crump

182 So. 291.

Opinion Filed June 15, 1938.

Rehearing Denied July 1, 1938.

*800S'. *Sherman Weiss,*for Appellant;

*Carl H. Mosely,*for Appellee.

Pee Cueiam.

The appeal is from an order dismissing bill of complaint which sought to enforce an alleged lien of a materialman against the property of an owner who had paid the contractor after completion of the work the full contract price of and for the work and materials done, performed and furnished.

■ The question presented by the appellant is:

“The defendant entered into a contract with one De La Vergne for the purpose of having improvements made on the property involved in this suit. For the purpose of making said improvements, the said De La Vergne obtained from the plaintiff various and sundry materials, the last furnishing of which was on the 6th day of November, 1936. The defendant did not know who supplied the materials used in said improvements, and had no knowledge that same were being supplied by the plaintiff. The final payment was made to the contractor on the 10th day of December, 1936, without a demand by the defendant that the said contractor present her with an affidavit or statement under oath in the manner provided for in sub-section 3 of Section 5396 (5), Compiled General Laws, nor was such affidavit furnished at any time by the said contractor. On January 25th, 1937, the plaintiff caused to be filed notice of lien, and a copy of same was served on the defendant by registered mail. Under the above statement of facts, was the mgney paid by the defendant to the con*801tractor, within three months of the last furnishing of supplies, properly paid upon her failure to demand and receive a statement under oath showing that all materials and labor had been paid for in full or showing those remaining unpaid ?”

Or, as he says, stated otherwise, is: “Does payment to a general contractor made within three months of the last furnishing if supplied by a materialman constitute proper payment so as to discharge the lien of the materialman where no statement under oath was given by or demanded of the contractor prior to said payment?”

There is no allegation in the bill of complaint that the complainant had complied with the conditions' precedent to acquire a lien on the defendant’s property. A material-man’s lien is strictly statutory and before any person may have such lien the statutory provisions must be strictly complied with and before he can enforce such lien the claimant must allege and prove a strict compliance with every requirement of the statute. See Curtis-Bright Ranch Co. v. Selden Cypress Door Co., 91 Fla. 322, 107 So. 684.

It follows that there was no error in the order dismissing the bill of complaint. Same should be, and is, affirmed.

So ordered.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
No. 50496.

#### Protest 73271-K of Foster Canning Co., Inc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dog food similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 175, C. A. D. 304), which record was incorporated herein, the protest was sustained as claimed.
Exhibit 32.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
the Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the
best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Winton Series.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                          
|Robert J. Enck President
and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                            
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                             
|Brent Bales Chief Financial
Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund                 

Date:
May 12, 2011
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZHIDONG ZHU,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71535

Agency No. A096-345-836

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Zhidong Zhu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen removal

proceedings conducted in absentia. Our jurisdiction is governed by

FILED

JUL 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71535

8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d

770, 773 (9th Cir. 2008), we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

review.

The IJ did not abuse his discretion in denying Zhu’s motion to reopen

because written notice of the hearing was mailed to Zhu and to his counsel of

record, and the motion was untimely filed three years after the issuance of the

April 13, 2004, in absentia order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii).

The IJ also did not abuse his discretion in determining the evidence of

religious persecution was insufficient to establish a showing of changed country

conditions in China, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(i), and that evidence of

smugglers’ threats was insufficient to establish prima facie eligibility for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture, see

Mendez-Gutierrez v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1168, 1171 (9th Cir. 2006) (prima facie

eligibility is established “where the evidence reveals a reasonable likelihood that

the statutory requirements for relief have been satisfied”). 

We lack jurisdiction to consider Zhu’s contention that the IJ incorrectly

determined that Zhu was removable as charged because Zhu failed to exhaust this

contention before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.

2004) (generally requiring exhaustion of claims before the BIA). 
3 08-71535

We lack jurisdiction to review Zhu’s contention that the IJ should have

invoked his sua sponte authority to reopen his proceedings. See Ekimian v. INS,

303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
the Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies,
to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Currency Series.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                             
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                               
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                    
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 12, 2009
No. 50501.

#### Protests 17108-K, etc., of Beacon Wiper Supply Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise in question consists of cotton rags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schapiro & Sons*(24 C. C. P. A. 343, T. D. 48771) and *J. Milton Hagy Waste Works*v. *United States*(2 Cust. Ct. 385, C. D. 162), the protests were sustained as claimed.
No. 58099.

protests 219816-K and 219817-K (New York).

#### Aero Sea Shipping Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protests were therefore overruled.
No. 59059.

protests 241759-K and 241760-K (New York).

#### D. C. Andrews & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

An examination of the official record disclosing no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct classification of the merchandise made by the collector, the protests were overruled.
No. 47936.

#### Protest 997134-G of R. U. Delapenha & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In view of Abstract 45762 and stipulation of counsel that the ginger is not composed in chief value of manufactured sugar, the court held that the tax is not applicable thereto, as claimed in the amended protest.
```

                                                                   EXHIBIT 13.1

    CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC SS.1350,
         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by this
Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 of
Metalink Ltd. (the "Company") as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") on the date hereof (the "Report"), and pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, I, Tzvika Shukhman, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board, certify that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: January 24, 2011

                                                 BY: /S/ Tzvika Shukhman
                                                 -----------------------

                                                 Name: Tzvika Shukhman
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer
```