alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 18, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1777 Lower Tribunal Nos. 20-363-A-K, 21-21-A-K

________________ 

### Katherine Supp, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark Wilson, Judge. Katherine Supp, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                  
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                                    
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                     
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                         
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: August 14, 2009
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8165 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish qualifications for the 

appointment of a person as a marriage and family therapist, qualified 

to provide clinical supervision, in the Veterans Health Administration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2024 

Ms. BROWNLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish qualifications for the appointment of a person as a marriage 

and family therapist, qualified to provide clinical supervision, in the Veterans Health Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8165 IH

1 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR 

2 THE APPOINTMENT OF A PERSON AS A MAR3 RIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPIST, QUALIFIED 

4 TO PROVIDE CLINICAL SUPERVISION, IN THE 

5 VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. 

6 Section 7402(b)(10) of title 38, United States Code, 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and 

9 (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; 

10 (2) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘To be eligible’’; 

11 and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub13 paragraph (B): 

14 ‘‘(B) To be eligible to be appointed to a marriage and 

15 family therapist position and qualified to provide clinical 

16 supervision, a person must— 

17 ‘‘(i) have the qualifications set forth in subpara18 graph (A); and 

19 ‘‘(ii)(I) be authorized to provide clinical super20 vision in the State described in clause (ii) of such 

21 subparagraph; or 

22 ‘‘(II) be designated as an approved supervisor 

23 by the American Association for Marriage and Fam24 ily Therapy.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Michael Bowler, *Respondent, v.*The City of Cohoes, *Appellant.*Same *ex rel.*McGuirk, Respondent, *v.*The Same, *Appellant.*Same *ex rel.*O’Dea, *Respondent, v.*The Same, *Appellant.*Same *ex rel.*Thomas Davis, *Respondent, v.*The Same, *Appellant.*

— Order reversed in each case, with costs of appeal, under section 3240 of Code, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Mem. by Boardman, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 07-809; MB Docket No. 05-229; RM-10780] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; denial of petition for reconsideration. 

# SUMMARY:

This document denies a petition for reconsideration filed by Gerald Proctor (“Proctor”) directed to the Report and Order in this proceeding. In denying the petition for reconsideration, the Media Bureau affirms the dismissal of Proctor's untimely expression of interest because it would prejudice a conflicting application. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Helen McLean, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2738. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the Commission's                     *Memorandum Opinion and Order*, MB Docket No. 05-229, adopted February 21, 2007, and released February 23, 2007. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC's Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or                     *http://www.BCPIWEB.com.*

                    This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. The Commission is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this                     *Memorandum Opinion and Order*                     to the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act,                     *see*5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the aforementioned petition for reconsideration was denied.                 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. E7-4548 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### In the Matter of Nostrand Gardens Co-Op, Appellant, v Pauline Howard et al., Respondents.

[634 NYS2d 505]

—In a summary proceeding to recover possession of real property and rent arrears, the petitioner landlord appeals, by permission, on *638the ground of inadequacy, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated October 29, 1993, affirming a judgment of the Civil Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated April 15, 1992, which after a nonjury trial finding that it had breached the warranty of habitability and that the respondents were entitled to a 50% abatement of the rent, is in its favor and against the respondents in the principal sum of only $1,351.04.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention there is sufficient evidence m the record to sustain the trial court’s determination that it breached the warranty of habitability by depriving the respondents of the quiet enjoyment of their apartment. The record reveals that there was excessive noise emanating from an apartment that neighbored the respondents’ apartment through the late night and early morning hours *(see, Sutton Fifty-Six Co. v Garrison,*93 AD2d 720) and that the petitioner, despite having ample notice, failed to take any effective steps to abate the nuisance *(see, Park W. Mgt. Corp. v Mitchell,*47 NY2d 316, *cert denied*444 US 992; *Cohen v Werner,*82 Mise 2d 295, *affd*85 Misc 2d 341).

One of the remedies that is available to a tenant for a landlord’s violation of the warranty of habitability is an abatement of the rent, and the proper measure of damages is the difference between the fair market value of the premises if they had been as warranted and the value of the premises during the period of the breach *(see, Park W. Mgt. Corp. v Mitchell, supra).*In this case, the respondents produced evidence regarding the nature, scope, and duration of the breach and the effectiveness of measures that were taken by the landlord to abate the nuisance. Therefore, the trial court had a sufficient basis upon which to determine the appropriate measure of damages. Accordingly, we find that the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by finding that the respondents were entitled to a 50% abatement of the rent *(see, Park W. Mgt. Corp. v Mitchell, supra; Ocean Rock Assocs. v Cruz,*66 AD2d 878; *McGuiness v Jakubiak,*106 Misc 2d 317; *Sargent Realty Corp. v Vizzini,*101 Misc 2d 763; *Bernstein v Barrett,*101 Misc 2d 611; *Kalikow Props, v Modny,*NYLJ, May 2, 1978, at 5, col 1).

We have reviewed the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Case Wo. 7,952.

#### KURTZ v. HOLLINGSHEAD.

[3 Cranch, C. C. 68.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1826.

Deeds — Recording Lost Deed — Effect of Loss of Deed.

If a complainant in equity has lost his legal lien and priority, a court of equity will not set it up against other creditors equally meritorious.

This was a bill in equity [against Hollings-head's heirs and personal representatives] for the sale of real estate mortgaged in August, 3814, by Hollingshead to D. Kurtz, as trustee for the Bank of Columbia, by two deeds which were not recorded, and are now lost. 51r. hlelvin, one of the defendants, who indorsed other notes of Hollingshead, objects to the complainant’s claim of priority, or lien upon the land. The two deeds were in possession of the bank at the commencement of this suit, and the bill prayed that they might be recorded agreeably to the 11th section of the act of Maryland, 1785 (chapter 72), which also provides that such deed, so recorded, should net “in any manner affect the ereuitors of the party making such deed, who may trust such party after the date of the said deed." The bill also prayed that the mortgages might be foreclosed, and the property sold for the payment of the debt.

Before CRANCH. Chief Judge, and THRUS-TON and 5IORSELL, Circuit Judges.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Crunch, Chief Judge.]

CRANCH, Chief Judge.

The complainants are now seeking, in equity, to establish a legal priority. “Equity is equality.” The equity of the other creditors is equal to that of the bank, and the bank has lost its legal priority. I think the bill must be dismissed, but without costs, as the deeds have been lost since the bill was filed.

MORSELL. Circuit Judge, doubted.

Bill dismissed.

[Subsequently the case was heard upon the complainant’s bill, asking to set up the lost deeds, and claiming an equitable preference. Case No. 7,953.]
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton Series.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                               
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                             
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund
Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund



|                                                                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                 
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                  
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                      
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund

Date: May 8, 2009
No. 48558.

#### Protest 798450-G of S. B. Penick & Co. (New York).

*219Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the importation consisted of 32 cases of olibanum fine garblings and that at the time of importation the cases were marked “Product of Arabia.” The collector required that they be marked “Product of Aden” before being released. The marking was held not sufficient to indicate that Aden is the country of origin of the merchandise. The protest was therefore overruled.
#### City of West Palm Beach, *et al.,*v. State, *ex rel.*R. A. Peterson.

182 So. 446.

Opinion Filed June 30, 1938.

*Paul W. Potter,*for Plaintiffs in Error.

*Casey, Walton & Spain,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of City of West Palm Beach v. State, *ex rel.*Peterson, this day filed, and on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of State, *ex rel.,*v. West Palm Beach, 125 Fla. 626, 170 Sou. 696, and the judgment in the above named companion case, the judgment should be, and is, affirmed.

So ordered.

Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
(Reap. Dec. 8583)

#### Frank H. Gregory *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 51-H; 88-H.

(Decided May 18, 1956)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(William J. Vitale,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement, consolidated at the trial, involve pictures and frames exported from Mexico on September 9, 1944, and on August 11, 1945.

The merchandise was invoiced, entered, and appraised as follows:

Reap. No. Invoiced (Mex. pesos) Entered (Mex. pesos) Appraised (Mex. pesos)

165901-A

Item A_ 22.50, each_ 22.50, each, plus stamps, 8.09. Portraits at 26.25, each, plus 0.88% tax, net, packed. Frames at 8.75, each, plus 0.88% tax, net, packed.

Item B_ 40.00, each_ 40.00, each, plus stamps, 8.09. Portraits at 41.25, each, plus 0.88% tax, net, packed. Frames at 13.75, each, plus 0.88% tax, net, packed.

165902-A.. 652.50, total... 652.50, total, plus stamps, 5.81. Portraits at 26.25, each,-plus 3.3% tax, net, packed. Frames at 8.75, each, plus 3.3% tax, net, packed.

*573At the trial, it was stipulated as follows:

> Mr. Vitale: The Government is further willing to stipulate and agree that at the time of exportation of the merchandise, invoiced as 40 pictures, frames and pictures, singles, but comprising of 39 pictures, frames and pictures, double, in reappraisement 165901-A, and 29 pictures frames and pictures, singles, in reappraisement 165902-A, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, at 22.50 Mexican pesos each for the singles, and 40 Mexican pesos each for the doubles, each plus tax as entered, packing included, and we are willing to stipulate with Mr. Gregory that there was no higher foreign value as defined in Section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act as amended, for the merchandise involved herein at the time of exportation thereof, and we will further stipulate and agree that this case, as consolidated, may be submitted for decision upon the foregoing stipulation. Is that agreeable with you?

> Mr. Gregory: That is agreeable.

On the agreed facts, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are 22.50 Mexican pesos, each, for the single frames and pictures, and 40 Mexican pesos, each, for the double frames and pictures, each plus tax, as entered, packing included.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

s0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

139044

PATSY L. FRENCH, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139044 COA: 282718 Muskegon CC: 06-044752-CH COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., d/b/a AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER,Defendant/Third-Party PlaintiffAppellant,

and

JOHN D. FLYNN, Personal Representative of the Estate of CALVIN GREEN FRENCH, JR., Third-Party Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 30, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 56 (Friday, March 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5392]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated November 21, 2006, and published in the Federal 
Register on December 1, 2006, (71 FR 69593), Norac, Inc., 405 S. Motor 
Avenue, P.O. Box 577, Azusa, California 91702, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370), a basic class 
of controlled substance listed in schedule I.
    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance in 
bulk for formulation into the pharmaceutical controlled substance 
Marinol<SUP>[reg]</SUP>.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Norac, Inc to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled 
substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has 
investigated Norac, Inc to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above 
named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: March 8, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-5392 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P