alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RANDY NEUGEBAUER 

19TH DiSTRICT, TEXAS 

R001.r 1424 

la.tGwORTH House OFFICE BurLD!IIG 

WASH<tiGTal, DC 20515·4319 

PHOr~e: (202) 225·4005 

FAX: (202) 225-9615 

www.randy.house.gov 

randy@mall.house.gov 

~ongrt!i!i of tbt llnittb ~tatts 

~oust of l\epresentatibes 

Ms. Aloha Ley 

Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE W86-310 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

June 7, 2012 

I am pleased to recommend the City of Abilene for funding through the Department of 

Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis. 

With funding from the Small Community Air Service Development Grant, the Abilene 

Regional Airpmt will be able to increase customer choices by adding non-stop service 

from Abilene to an additional airline hub airport, increase route oppmtunities and 

capacity, reduce average fares paid by passengers using Abilene, and reduce leakage to 

other airports in the region. 

I support the Abilene Regional Airport request for funding and ask that all due 

consideration be given to this wise investment opportunity. 

Sincerely, 

Randy ~ Neugebauer 

RN/sl 

611 UmveRsrrv Aver-tue 

Su11e220 

LUBBOCl<, TX 79401 

(806) 763-1611 

1510ScUAAYSTREET 

SuneB 

BlG SPR.IIG, TX 79720 

(432) 264..()722 

SOOCHEimm 

Surre819 

ABlLEIIE, TX 79602 

(325) 675·9779
EXHIBIT 13.2

ALESTRA, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER

I, Patricio E. de la Garza, the Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Companys annual report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2007, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2008



Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V.By:

/s/ Patricio E. de la GarzaPatricio E. De la GarzaChief Financial and Administrative Officer


This certification accompanies the report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification will no be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Alestra, S. de R. L. de C. V. specifically incorporated it by reference.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2011, (the Report) of Innovaro, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Carole R. WrightName: Carole R. WrightDate: April 19, 2012
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lyndon D. Goodell, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 279]

—Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not err in denying without a hearing that branch of defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict based upon defendant’s alleged newly-recovered memory of the incident. That branch of the motion was supported only by defendant’s sworn allegations, not by any medical evidence. The conclusory and unsupported allegations were insufficient to entitle defendant to a hearing *(see, People v La Pella,*185 AD2d 861, 862, *lv denied*81 NY2d 842). Moreover, defendant did not state in his affidavit that he planned to testify if he were granted a new trial *(see, People v Williams,*35 AD2d 1023, 1024).

The court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict based upon the testimony of a newly-discovered witness to the incident. Defendant did not carry his burden at the hearing of proving by a preponderance of the ev*1010idence that the verdict probably would have been more favorable to him had the testimony of that witness been presented at trial *(see,*CPL 440.10 [1] [g]; 440.30 [6]; *see also, People v Rodriguez,*193 AD2d 363, 365-366, *lv denied*81 NY2d 1079).

The motion to vacate the conviction was not based on the ground that defendant was denied effective assistance of trial counsel *(see,*CPL 440.30 [1]), and we decline to address that issue for the first time on appeal. (Appeal from Order of Genesee County Court, Morton, J.—CPL art 440.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 57 (Monday, March 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 10, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. William Scott Martin Trust and William S. Martin, Miami Beach, 
Florida, as trustee; to acquire control of Green Country 
Bancorporation, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire control of The 
First State Bank, both in Ketchum, Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 21, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-5437 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date:             |  |                        
|November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal       
|                  |  |                        
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                  |  |                        
|                  |  |                        



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 47436.

#### Protests 34488-K (C), etc., of W. X. Huber Co. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8292 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

penalties for unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 8292 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Data Protec3 tion Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED DIS5 CLOSURES OF TAXPAYER INFORMATION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and 

7 (5) of section 7213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

8 1986 are each amended by striking ‘‘$5,000, or imprison9 ment of not more than 5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘$250,000, 

10 or imprisonment of not more than 10 years’’. 

11 (b) DISCLOSURES OF RETURN INFORMATION OF

12 MULTIPLE TAXPAYERS TREATED AS MULTIPLE VIOLA13 TIONS.—Section 7213(a) of such Code is amended by add14 ing at the end the following new paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(6) DISCLOSURES OF RETURN INFORMATION

16 OF MULTIPLE TAXPAYERS TREATED AS MULTIPLE

17 VIOLATIONS.—For purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), 

18 (3), (4), and (5), a separate violation occurs with re19 spect to each taxpayer whose return or return infor20 mation is disclosed in violation of any such para21 graph.’’. 
3 

•HR 8292 EH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to disclosures made after the date 

3 of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8292 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

taxpayer information. increase penalties for unauthorized disclosure of
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Winton/Graham Series.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                              
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier
Fund
|                                                                                                                                                
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                 
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              
|                                                                                                                                                
|Date: August 12, 2008
#### First Monroe, Inc., Respondent, v Regency Manor Associates, L.P., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[635 NYS2d 555]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy,*140 AD2d 988; *see also,*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Frazee, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF ISNI.NET, INC FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,750
<PP&E>                                         104,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          288,981
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,666
<OTHER-SE>                                   (184,232)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,141
<SALES>                                        390,840
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               395,225
<CGS>                                          159,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               354,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (123,788)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,411
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (126,199)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (126,199)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned,
certifies that to the best of her knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and its results of operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Tammie A. Quinlan                               
|Date: November 13, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | TAMMIE A. QUINLAN                                   
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**DANIEL J. THOMAS**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Daniel J. Thomas, of Concentra OperatingCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

I further certify that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

March 29, 2006
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)

File Name: 22a0059p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DAVID E. MCCALL,JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

┐

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

┘

No. 21-3400

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland.

No. 1:13-cr-00345-41—Christopher A. Boyko, District Judge.

Decided and Filed: April 1, 2022

Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS, GRIFFIN, 

KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, 

NALBANDIAN, READLER, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_________________

COUNSEL

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Rebecca Chattin Lutzko, Matthew B. Kall, 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee. ON RESPONSE: 

Vanessa Malone, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Akron, Ohio, for 

Appellant.

_________________

ORDER

_________________

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en 

banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

>
No. 21-3400 United States v. McCall Page 2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous 

opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on 

the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are 

vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for 

oral argument as soon as possible.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

___________________________________

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
No. 46200.

#### Protest 23535-K of Bullocks, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated by counsel that the silk mufflers in question are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract-44055. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 was therefore sustained. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Bullocks*v. *245
      *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) it was held that the merchandise was not subject to bounty.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH A. DI RIENZO, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Elliot M. Bross*and *Mr. Stephen Sinins*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Joseph P. Lordi*and *Mr. Alan Bilber*for the respondent.

May 28, 1968.

Denied.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2012-1162

Directorate Identifier: 2012NM002AD

A330-56-3009, R01 --- 1/27/11

A330-56-3009 --- 5/4/10

A340-56-4008 --- 5/4/10

A340-56-5002 --- 5/4/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### Peter L. Osterhout, *Appellant, v.*The Town of Shawangunk, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by *444Bocees, J., and Mem. by Learned, P. J.; "Westbrook, J., not acting.
(V. D. 53)

Entry Nos. 05-604; 05-882; 05-6270; 05-514, 05-813; 05-965; 05-2004; 05-2281.

#### Border Brokerage Company *v.*United States

(Decided November 27, 1957)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*531Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the third division of this court in *Border Brokerage Company*v. *United States,*39 Cust. Ct. 326, Abstract 60936. The conclusion therein, and the judgment issued pursuant thereto, was to the effect that the protests had been prematurely filed and the matter was remanded to a single judge in reappraisement to determine the proper dutiable values in the manner provided by law. (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).)

A stipulation of submission, upon which the matter is now before me, establishes that the proper dutiable value of the merchandise involved herein is the same as the appraised values in all of the entries in question, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.