alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
         PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, George H. Walker, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2005 of Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund Partners II, LLC;

     2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  report  does not  contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other
financial  information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all
material respects the financial condition,  results of operations, and cash
flow of the  registrant  as of,  and for,  the  periods  presented  in this
report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible
for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

        a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its
consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by  others  within  those
entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  report is being
prepared;

        b.  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the  registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely
to materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal  control over financial
reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent  evaluation  of internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors  and the board of  directors  of
Goldman Sachs Hedge Funds Strategies LLC:

        a. All  significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses  in the
design or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
reasonably  likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

        b. Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or
other employees who have a significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:   August 15, 2005

/s/ George H. Walker
----------------------------------
Name:   George H. Walker
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
446 A.2d 671

#### Commonwealth v. Peterson, Appellant.

Submitted March 17, 1982.

Robert G. *578Kochems, for appellant; Samuel J. Orr, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, JOHNSON and HOFFMAN, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
No. 65577.

#### Kroder Reubel Co., Inc., and Alltransport, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 314873-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass pole rings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kroder Reubel Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 274, C.D. 2186), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### Marshall Field & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6622.

Entry No. 1753, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, October 25, 1941, etc.

Certified October 25, 1941, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., November 28, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 16, 1946)

*James W. Bevans*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Samuel F. Prentiss, *as*Receiver, *etc., Appellant, v.*William J. Nichols, *Respondent.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Daniels, J.
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                |  |                        
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date:           |  |                        
|August 22, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal       
|                |  |                        
|                |  | Marc N. Teal           
|                |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                |  |                        
|                |  |                        



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.23
                                                                   -------------

              AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO INTERIM SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

      This Amendment No.1 to Interim Software License Agreement (the
"Amendment') is made and entered into effective as of July 1, 2001, by and among
Concentra Health Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("CHS"), First Notice
Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("FNS"), and Em3 Corporation, a Nevada
corporation, formerly known as DevCorp Systems, Inc. ("Em3").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

      WHEREAS, CHS, FNS, and Em3 are parties to a certain Interim Software
LicenseAgreement, dated September 28, 2000 (the "License Agreement"); and

      WHEREAS, CHS, FNS, and Em3 desire to make certain changes to the License
Agreement, as set forth herein;

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises
and agreements set forth herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, CHS, FNS, and Em3 hereby agree as follows:

      1. License Fee Amount and Payment. Section 4.1 of the License Agreement is
         ------------------------------
hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: "As consideration for the
Software license granted herein, Em3 agrees to pay to Concentra a license fee of
Two Thousand Five Hundred and No/00 Dollars ($2,500.00) per month during the
term of this Agreement (the "License Fee"). License Fee payments shall be due on
the first day of each month during the term of this Agreement, and payments for
any partial month shall be prorated."

      2. No Change. Except as expressly modified hereby, the License Agreement
         ---------
shall continue in effect unchanged. That certain June 1, 2001, letter from Em3
to Concentra Inc., providing notice of termination of the License Agreement, is
hereby cancelled and rescinded.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Amendment on and as
of the date first set forth above.

EM3:                                            CHS:
----                                            ----

EM3 CORPORATION                                 CONCENTRA HEALTH SERVICES, INC.


By: /s/ James M. Greenwood                      By: /s/ Richard A. Parr II
   --------------------------------                -----------------------------
     James M. Greenwood                             Richard A. Parr II
     President                                      Executive Vice President


                                       1

<PAGE>

FNS:
----

FIRST NOTICE SYSTEMS, INC.


By: /s/ Richard A. Parr II
  -------------------------------
    Richard A. Parr II
    Vice President


                                       2
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA - XXXX -XXXX Directorate ID: 20 10 - SW - 060 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (Eurocopter) Model MBB - BK - 117 C - 2 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 107 Helicopters in the US Registry. Reason : Reduced intermediate gear box (IGB) bevel gear service life. Costs : Parts per Helicopter 0 Labor per Helicopter ( 0.5 x $ 8 5 /work-hour) $ 43 to inspect to determine if IGB is affected. Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 43 Total U S Fleet Cost $ 4, 601 (inspections only) Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Fl exibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: Chinh Vuong
ex4-3.htm


Exhibit 4.3

 



 

September 29, 2008

 

 

VIA FACSIMILE TO (212) 616-7608

AND FEDERAL EXPRESS

Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company

17 Battery Place, 8th Floor

New York, New York 10004

Attn: Ms. Alexandra Albrecht

 

 

Re:     Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.; Rights Agreement;

           Our File No. 7034-002                                                                    

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Certain subparagraphs of the Rights Agreement, dated May 2, 2008 (the “Rights Agreement”), by and between Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (the “Company”) and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (the “Rights Agent”) were inadvertently numbered incorrectly. This letter agreement changes the Rights Agreement to correct such numbering system pursuant to the authority granted to the Company and the Rights Agent in Section 27 of the Rights Agreement. Effective upon the execution of this letter by the Company and the Rights Agent, the following subparagraph numbers of the Rights Agreement are changed as indicated:

 

	 	
1.
	
Subparagraphs 13(e) and (f) are hereby renumbered 13(a) and (b), respectfully;



 

	 	
2.
	
Subparagraphs 14(e), (f) and (g) are hereby renumbered 14(a), (b) and (c), respectfully;



 

	 	
3.
	
Subparagraphs 16(e), (f), (g) and (h) are hereby renumbered 16(a), (b), (c) and (d), respectfully;



 

	 	
4.
	
Subparagraphs 20(e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (l) and (m) are hereby renumbered 20(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h) and (i), respectfully;



 

	 	
5.
	
Subparagraphs 23(e), (f) and (g) are hereby renumbered 23(a), (b) and (c), respectfully;



 

	 	
6.
	
Subparagraphs 24(e), (f), (g) and (h) are hereby numbered 24(a), (b), (c) and (d), respectfully; and



 

	 	
7.
	
Subparagraphs 25(e) and (f) are hereby renumbered 25(a) and (b), respectfully.



 

 


 

 




 


 

Compliance Department

Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company

September 29, 2008

Page 2 

 

Except as expressly set forth above, the Rights Agreement remains effective without modification. This letter agreement may be signed in two counterparts, which together will constitute a single agreement. Please indicate acceptance of the foregoing by signing where indicated below.

 

	
 
	
PERMA-FIX ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	 	By:	/s/Steven Baughman	 
	 	 	Steven T. Baughman	 
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Dated: September 29, 2008	 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	 	CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY	 
	 	 	/s/Alexandra Albrecht	 
	 	 	Alexandra Albrecht,	 
	 	 	Vice President and Senior Account Manager
	 	 	 	 
	 	Dated: September 29, 2008
Before the First Division,

September 11, 1944

No. 49706.

#### Protests 889351-G, etc., of Columbia Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise assessed as a mixture of chemical compounds is similar to that involved in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). As this merchandise was found to contain salt it was excluded from paragraph 5 and held dutiable as claimed, at 20 percent under paragraph 1558. In accordance with stipulation and following Abstract 34104 the claim as apricot kernels at' 3 cents per pound was sustained. It was also stipulated that the fish packed in lard is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 41800. It was therefore held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 718 (b) as claimed.
446 A.2d 695

#### Kessler, Appellant v. Gregory et al.

Argued May 20, 1981.

William J. Wiker and Jon M. Lewis, for appellant; Stephen L. Dugas, for appellees.

Before HESTER, POPOVICH and DiSALLE, JJ.

Order affirmed.

DiSALLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sharon L. Kinsey, (SBN 187285) 

KINSEY CONSUMER LAW CENTER 

16400 Bonney Road 

Watsonville Ca. 95076 

Telephone: (831) 274-2417 

Facsimile: (831) 274-2512 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ROBERT BARABINO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

CALIFORNIA EASTERN DISTRICT - SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

ROBERT BARABINO, 

 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

DAN GAMEL, INC.; FLEETWOOD 

ENTERPRISES, INC., FLEETWOOD 

MOTOR HOMES OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No.: 2:04-cv-2359 MCE PAN 

ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY 

DEADLINE 

ORDER 

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 

That the PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER dated March 30, 2005, is modified 

to extend the Expert Disclosure Deadline of January 20, 2006 to February 28, 2006 only 

as to the production of the expert’s report. 

Dated: January 20, 2006

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02359-MCE-EFB Document 35 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 2:04-cv-02359-MCE-EFB Document 35 Filed 01/23/06 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 12, 2017

a0906 

# Order

Clerk September 12, 2017

152510

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152510

COA: 328413

Oakland CC: 2014

- 251776

- FC

CERVANTES DIAN CARSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

By order of June 28, 2016

, the application for leave to appeal the September 11,

2015 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pendi ng the decision in People

v Comer (Docket No. 152713). On order of the Court, the case having be en decided on

June 23, 2017, 500 Mich ___ (2017), the application is again considered, and it is

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question present ed should be reviewed

by this Court.
1

SYNOPSIS OF THE CASE1

2011 MT 269; DA 10-0260: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and 

Appellee, v. MILES CASSIDY KINGMAN, Defendant and Appellant.

The Montana Supreme Court has unanimously affirmed the aggravated assault 

conviction and sentence of Miles Kingman. Kingman was charged with brutally 

assaulting Paul Overby outside a Bozeman bar in September 2008. On appeal, Kingman 

claimed that his right to a fair trial was violated when the trial judge refused to move his 

trial from Gallatin County because of the pre-trial publicity. The Court disagreed and 

affirmed Kingman’s conviction and his 20-year sentence.

The charge against Kingman arose out of an incident behind the Scoop Bar in the 

early morning hours of September 17, 2008. Kingman and his friend Ryan Dibert got 

into an altercation with Paul Overby regarding a motor scooter parked behind the bar. 

All three men had been drinking, and witnesses to the incident saw Kingman, Dibert, and 

Overby shouting, gesturing, and posturing. Kingman and Dibert began to walk away, but 

Overby shoved Kingman several times from behind and hit Kingman once. Kingman 

turned and punched Overby, knocking him to the ground. Kingman then got on top of 

Overby and punched him in the face 15 to 20 times, causing extensive fractures to the 

vast majority of the bones in Overby’s face, as well as an open fracture to his brain. 

Overby nearly died from the incident. Shortly afterward, Kingman left a voicemail 

message for a friend in which Kingman bragged about beating Overby. The State 

charged Kingman with attempted deliberate homicide. At trial, Kingman argued that he 

had acted in self-defense. The jury acquitted him of the homicide charge but convicted 

him of aggravated assault, a lesser-included offense.

On appeal, Kingman claimed that the publicity surrounding the incident had 

prejudiced the Gallatin County community to such an extent that he could not get a fair 

trial by jurors drawn from that community. Kingman cited newspaper reports from the 

Bozeman Daily Chronicle and The BoZone, plus several broadcasts on television station 

 

1 This synopsis has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It constitutes no part of the 

Opinion of the Court and may not be cited as precedent.

November 1 2011
2

KBZK. The Supreme Court, agreeing with the District Court, concluded that Kingman 

had not shown a sufficient basis for presuming that the entire Gallatin County jury pool 

was corrupted by the pre-trial publicity.

As for his 20-year sentence, Kingman argued that the prosecutor had improperly 

characterized him at the sentencing hearing as an “animal” that “needed to be caged.” 

The Supreme Court agreed that the prosecutor’s remarks were inappropriate, but found 

no indication that the remarks had factored into the District Court’s decision to impose 

the maximum sentence for aggravated assault.
```
      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                                
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit
                                
                                



No. 97-2339

                        ERIC VIERA-NEGRON,

                      Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                v.

                    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                       Defendant, Appellee.



           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                 FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

        [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]



                              Before

                      Boudin, Circuit Judge,
                 Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,
                   and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
                                
                                


     Eric Viera-Negron on brief pro se.
     Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Nelson Perez-Sosa,
Antonio R. Bazan, Joseph Hoffer, Assistant United States Attorneys,
and Jose A. Quiles-Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, on brief
for appellee.





June 2, 1998



                                
                                
            Per Curiam.  We have reviewed the parties' briefs and
    the  record on appeal.  We affirm the district court judgment
    dismissing appellant's motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. �
    2255, essentially for the reasons stated in the magistrate-
    judge's report and recommendation, dated March 21, 1997, and
    the district court's opinion and order, dated September 8,
    1997.  We add only this.  Viera-Negron admitted to carrying the
    firearm on his person in a shoulder bag.  We do not think his
    claim raises any serious question about accessibility of the
    weapon.  See United States v. Cleveland, 106 F.3d 1056 (1st
    Cir. 1997), cert. granted.  We decline to consider the issues
    that appellant failed to present to the district court in this
    � 2255 motion and raised for the first time on appeal.  SeeUnited States v. Haggert, 980 F.2d 8, 10 (1st Cir. 1992).
              Affirmed.  See Loc. R. 27.1.
```
No. 49725.

#### Protests 767991-G, etc., of Chong Kee Jan & Co. et al. (San Francisco, etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q of Summit Financial Services Group, Inc. (the
Company), for the Quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marshall T. Leeds, Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Marshall T. Leeds                                       
|Marshall T. Leeds                                           
|Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
|Dated: November 14, 2008