Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 57 / Monday, March 26, 2007 / Notices 14077 

1See Initiation of Five-Year ( Sunset‘‘) Reviews, 

71 FR 57921, and Pure Magnesium from China, 71 

FR 58001 (October 2, 2006). 

2See Pure Magnesium in Granular Form from the 

People’s Republic of China; Notice of Final Results 

of Expedited Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty 

Order, 72 FR 5417 (February 6, 2007). 

3See Pure Magnesium from China, 72 FR 10258 

(March 7, 2007), USITC Publication 3908 (March 

2007) (Investigation No. 731-TA-895 (Review)). 

4See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Pure 

Magnesium From the People’s Republic of China, 

the Russian Federation and Ukraine; Notice of 

Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Antidumping Duty Investigation 

of Pure Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 

60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995). 

5The meaning of this term is the same as that 

used by the American Society for Testing and 

Materials in its Annual Book of ASTM Standards: 

Volume 01.02 Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys. 

United States, the Department is 

publishing notice of the continuation of 

this antidumping duty order. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 26, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hilary E. Sadler or Juanita Chen, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4340 and (202) 

482–1904, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 2, 2006, the Department 

initiated and the ITC instituted a sunset 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on pure magnesium in granular form 

from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act).1

As a result of its review, the 

Department found that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping and notified the ITC of the 

magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail were the order to be revoked.2

On March 1, 2007, the ITC determined, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on pure magnesium in granular 

form from the PRC would be likely to 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time.3

Scope of the Order 

There is an existing antidumping duty 

order on pure magnesium from the 

PRC.4 The scope of this order excludes 

pure magnesium that is already covered 

by the existing order on pure 

magnesium in ingot form and currently 

classifiable under item numbers 

8104.11.00 and 8104.19.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). The scope of 

this order includes imports of pure 

magnesium products, regardless of 

chemistry, including, without 

limitation, raspings, granules, turnings, 

chips, powder, and briquettes, except as 

noted above. Pure magnesium includes: 

(1) Products that contain at least 99.95 

percent primary magnesium, by weight 

(generally referred to as ‘‘ultra- pure’’

magnesium); (2) products that contain 

less than 99.95 percent but not less than 

99.8 percent primary magnesium, by 

weight (generally referred to as ‘‘pure’’

magnesium); (3) chemical combinations 

of pure magnesium and other material(s) 

in which the pure magnesium content is 

50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 

percent, by weight that do not conform 

to an ‘‘ASTM Specification for 

Magnesium Alloy’’5 (generally referred 

to as ‘‘off–specification pure’’

magnesium); and (4) physical mixtures 

of pure magnesium and other material(s) 

in which the pure magnesium content is 

50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 

percent, by weight. Excluded from this 

order are mixtures containing 90 

percent or less pure magnesium by 

weight and one or more of certain non–

magnesium granular materials to make 

magnesium–based reagent mixtures. 

The non–magnesium granular materials 

of which the Department is aware used 

to make such excluded reagents are: 

lime, calcium metal, calcium silicon, 

calcium carbide, calcium carbonate, 

carbon, slag coagulants, fluorspar, 

nephaline syenite, feldspar, aluminum, 

alumina (Al2O3), calcium aluminate, 

soda ash, hydrocarbons, graphite, coke, 

silicon, rare earth metals/mischmetal, 

cryolite, silica/fly ash, magnesium 

oxide, periclase, ferroalloys, dolomitic 

lime, and colemanite. A party importing 

a magnesium–based reagent which 

includes one or more materials not on 

this list is required to seek a scope 

clarification from the Department before 

such a mixture may be imported free of 

antidumping duties. The merchandise 

subject to this order is currently 

classifiable under item 8104.30.00 of the 

HTSUS. Although the HTSUS 

subheading is provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

description of the scope of this order is 

dispositive. 

Determination 

As a result of the determinations by 

the Department and the ITC that 

revocation of this antidumping duty 

order would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and material injury to an industry in the 

United States, pursuant to section 

751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department 

hereby orders the continuation of the 

antidumping duty order on pure 

magnesium in granular form from the 

PRC. 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

will continue to collect antidumping 

duty deposits at the rates in effect at the 

time of entry for all imports of subject 

merchandise. The effective date of the 

continuation of this order is the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this Notice of Continuation. Pursuant to 

section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the 

Department intends to initiate the next 

five-year review of this antidumping 

order not later than February 2012. 

This five-year (sunset) review and this 

continuation notice are in accordance 

with section 751(c) of the Act and 

published pursuant to 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: March 15, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–5501 Filed 3–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–831] 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils 

from Taiwan; Notice of Extension of 

Time Limits for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 26, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill 

Pollack, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4593. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 30, 2006, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published a notice of initiation of 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on Stainless 

Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from 

Taiwan. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 71 FR 51573 (Aug. 30, 2006). The 

period of review is July 1, 2005, through 

June 30, 2006, and the preliminary 

results are currently due no later than 

April 2, 2007. The review covers 12 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
14078 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 57 / Monday, March 26, 2007 / Notices 

producers/exporters of the subject 

merchandise to the United States. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

the Department shall make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping order within 245 days after 

the last day of the anniversary month of 

the date of publication of the order. 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further 

provides, however, that the Department 

may extend the 245-day period to 365 

days if it determines it is not practicable 

to complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. We determine 

that it is not practicable to complete this 

administrative review within the time 

limits mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act because we require additional 

time to analyze the respondent’s cost of 

production response and issue 

supplemental questionnaires. Therefore, 

we have fully extended the deadline for 

completing the preliminary results until 

July 31, 2007, which is 365 days from 

the last day of the anniversary month of 

the date of publication of the order. The 

deadline for the final results of the 

review continues to be 120 days after 

the publication of the preliminary 

results. 

This extension notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: March 19, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–5502 Filed 3–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–601] 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished or Unfinished, from 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Notice 

of Rescission in Part and Intent to 

Rescind in Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting the 

nineteenth administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on tapered 

roller bearings and parts thereof, 

finished or unfinished (‘‘TRBs’’), from 

the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), 

covering the period June 1, 2005, 

through May 31, 2006. If these 

preliminary results are adopted in our 

final results of review, we will instruct 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) to assess antidumping duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

during the period of review (‘‘POR’’) for 

which the importer–specific assessment 

rates are above de minimis. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

We intend to issue the final results no 

later than 120 days from the date of 

publication of this notice. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 26, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Eugene Degnan or Robert Bolling, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0414 and (202) 

482–3434, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 2, 2006, the Department 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on TRBs from 

the PRC for the period June 1, 2005, 

through May 31, 2006. See Antidumping 

or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, 

or Suspended Investigation: 

Opportunity to Request Administrative 

Review, 71 FR 32032 (June 2, 2006). On 

June 30, 2006, The Timken Company 

(‘‘Timken’’ or ‘‘Petitioner’’) requested 

that the Department conduct an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order covering TRBs 

from the PRC for entries of subject 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by Chin Jun Industrial Ltd. (‘‘Chin 

Jun’’), and Peer Bearing Company - 

Changshan (‘‘CPZ’’). Additionally, on 

June 30, 2006, Hebei Longsheng Metals 

& Minerals Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hebei 

Longsheng’’) and Yantai Timken 

Company Limited (‘‘Yantai’’) 

independently requested that the 

Department conduct an administrative 

review of their respective sales. Further, 

on June 30, 2006, Koyo Corporation of 

U.S.A. (‘‘Koyo’’), a U.S. producer of 

TRBs, requested that the Department 

conduct an administrative review of 

Yantai’s sales. On July 27, 2006, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register a notice of the initiation of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of TRBs from the PRC for the period 

June 1, 2005, through May 31, 2006, for 

Chin Jun, CPZ, Hebei Longsheng, and 

Yantai. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 71 FR 42626 (July 27, 2006) 

(‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

On August 9, 2006, the Department 

issued its antidumping duty 

questionnaire to all of the above 

respondents. 

On August 28, 2006, Chin Jun 

reported to the Department that it was 

a dormant company during the POR and 

had no sales of subject merchandise. On 

September 6, 2006, Yantai withdrew its 

request for review, stating that it did not 

intend to participate further in the 

review because of the limited value of 

its exports. Also on September 6, 2006, 

Hebei Longsheng submitted its Section 

A response to the Department’s original 

questionnaire. On September 8, 2006, 

CPZ reported to the Department that it 

did not intend to submit questionnaire 

responses because of the limited value 

of its exports. On September 29, 2006, 

Hebei Longsheng withdrew its request 

for review, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1). 

Notice of Intent to Rescind in Part and 

Partial Rescission 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the 

Department may rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, with respect to a particular 

exporter or producer, if the Secretary 

concludes that, during the period 

covered by the review, there were no 

entries, exports, or sales of the subject 

merchandise. The Department explains 

this practice in the preamble to the 

Department’s regulations. See 

Antidumping Duties; Countervailing 

Duties, 62 FR 27296, 27317 (May 19, 

1997) (‘‘Preamble’’); see also Stainless 

Steel Plate in Coils From Taiwan: 

Preliminary Results and Rescission in 

Part of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 67 FR 5789, 

5790 (February 7, 2002), and Stainless 

Steel Plate in Coils from Taiwan: Final 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 66 FR 18610 

(April 10, 2001). Because Chin Jun 

reported to the Department that it was 

a dormant company during the POR and 

it had no sales of subject merchandise, 

and we have received no evidence that 

Chin Jun had any shipments to the 

United States of subject merchandise 

during the POR, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3), the Department 

preliminarily rescinds this review as to 

Chin Jun. 

The Department’s regulations at 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(1) further provide that 

the Department will rescind an 

administrative review if the party that 

requested the review withdraws its 

request for review within 90 days of the 

date of publication of the notice of 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES