alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Tammie A. Quinlan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certifies
that (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and its results of operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.



|                        |  |  |  |                       |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ Tammie A. Quinlan
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | Name:                 |  | Tammie A. Quinlan                                   
|                        |  |  |  | Title:                |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of ebookers plc (the
     "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
     Nigel Addison Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
     pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





     Date: June 27, 2003


                                          /s/__Nigel Addison Smith____

                                               Nigel Addison Smith

                                               Chief Financial Officer




                                       98
Exhibit 32.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Winton Series.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                           
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                               
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                             
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                              
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                  
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: August 11, 2010
Exhibit 10.6


 


 


 


 


 


As of February 20, 2015


 


Kenneth D. Trbovich


2370 Lewis Road


South Wales, NY 14139-9711


 


 


Dear Mr. Kenneth D. Trbovich:


 


You and Servotronics, Inc. (the “Company”)
are parties to an Employment Agreement, dated June 15, 2012 pursuant to which you are employed by the Company. This letter confirms
such Employment Agreement and subsequent ratification and subsequent Amendment dated August 13, 2012 (the "Amended Agreement").


 


This letter will also confirm your
agreement and that of the Company (pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors passed by Unanimous Written Consent on February
20, 2015) to amend Paragraph 1 of the Amended Agreement to delete “December 31, 2018” and insert in its place “December
31, 2019” subject to your acceptance which will be indicated by your signature below.


 


If the foregoing meets with your approval
and you are willing to become bound hereby, will you please sign and return to the undersigned the enclosed copy of this letter.


 


Very truly yours,


 


SERVOTRONICS, INC.


 


 


 /s/ Bernadine E.
Kucinski               


Bernadine E. Kucinski,


Assistant Corporate Secretary


 


 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED


 


 


	/s/ Kenneth D. Trbovich	 	As of February 20, 2015	 
	Kenneth D. Trbovich	 	Date
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8324 

To designate the United States courthouse annex located at 310 South 

Main Street in London, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Eugene E. Siler, Jr. United 

States Courthouse Annex’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse annex located 

at 310 South Main Street in London, Kentucky, as the 

‘‘Eugene E. Siler, Jr. United States Courthouse Annex’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EUGENE E. SILER, JR. UNITED STATES COURT4 HOUSE ANNEX. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

6 annex located at 310 South Main Street in London, Ken7 tucky, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Eugene E. 

8 Siler, Jr. United States Courthouse Annex’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8324 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the United States courthouse annex referred to 

4 in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

5 ‘‘Eugene E. Siler, Jr. United States Courthouse Annex’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(Registration No. 333-33974) pertaining to the Apropos Technology, Inc.2000 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the Apropos Technology, Inc. EmployeeStock Purchase Plan of 2000, of our report dated January 25, 2005, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of AproposTechnology, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2004.
|                     | /s/ Grant Thornton LLP |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|
| Chicago, Illinois   |                        |
| March 30, 2005 |                        |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Total Luxury Group,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  for the  year  ended  December  31,  2004 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Sandy J.
Masselli,  Jr.,  as Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  hereby  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Sandy J. Masselli, Jr.
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Sandy J. Masselli, Jr.,
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

                                                  Date:  April 17, 2007
Case No. 14,521.

#### UNITED STATES v. BARLOW.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 94.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1802.

Larceny — Ownership op Goods — Indictment— Confession — Offering Bribe.

1. On a trial for larceny, of the goods of T. Lee. evidence that the goods were the property of a deceased person in the possession and management of T. Lee. will support the indictment.

2. The jury must believe or reject the whole of the prisoner’s confession. But the offer of a bribe by the prisoner to the officer, to permit him to escape, is evidence independent of the confession.

Indictment for stealing a horse, the property of Col. Thomas Lee. It was objected, on the trial, that the property was not in Thomas Lee, but belonged to the estate of Calvin Washington, deceased. But it being proved that Thomas Lee had the possession and management of that estate,

THE COURT

held that the property was well laid, and proved as laid. The confession of the prisoner being given in evidence, THE COURT instructed the jury that they must believe or reject the whole. CRANCH, Circuit Judge, doubted.

In the same conversation, the prisoner offered the witness a watch, and a deed of his house, if he would suffer him to escape.

THE COURT instructed the jury that this offer of the watch and deed was a separate fact, not depending on the confession before alluded to, and therefore good evidence by itself. KILTY, Chief Judge, doubting.
(V. D. 54)

Entry No. 966597.

#### Geigy Company, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 11, 1957)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran*Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This matter is presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in *Geigy Company, Inc.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 379, Abstract 59080. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matter be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matter has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values were as follows:

> Merchandise United States dollars per each

> 1, 300 magnifying glasses Art. No. 4, 10 power-$0. 52

> 1, 300 leather cases to fit_ 0. 19

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-1227 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SPACE COOPERATION 

 Implementing Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

Signed at Moscow March 10, 2007 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

 Space Cooperation 

Implementing agreement signed at Moscow 

 March 10, 2007; 

Entered into force December 27, 2007. 
















NOTE: It is noted that some of the page numbers in this table of contents are out of sequence.
#### Beverly Cohn et al., Respondents, v Heskel M. Haddad, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 1016]

—Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated July 5, 1994.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Spodek at the Supreme Court. Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
No. 64216.

protest 58/17868 (Detroit).

#### Wm. R. Neal *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that vinyl acetate resin is the component material of chief value of the imported merchandise, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
January 29, 1962

Reap. Dec. 10159.

#### Worthy Chemicals, Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R60/9325, etc.

Entered at New York, N.Y. Reap. Dec. 10121. Motion by plaintiff.
No. 51775.

#### Protests 700718-G, etc., of Steinberger Bros. Glove Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 779, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiffs was therefore sustained.
#### WALTER HARTYE, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. GRAND PROPERTIES, INC., *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

May 11, 1964. Denied.

See same case below: 82 *N. J. Super.*416.

*Messrs.*Florio, *Dunn, Marciano & Lypinshi*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Beggans & Keale*and *Mr. Robert E. Tarleton*for the respondents.

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.
April 16, 1945

No. 50130.

Suit 4451.

#### United *States*v. *Winograd Bros., Inc.*

C. D. 708 affirmed March 2, 1945. C. A. D. 302.
Appendix J: Calculation of Avian RQs using LD50 dataThe most sensitive dose-based endpoint is the Bobwhite Quail (178 g) with an LD50of 258 mg a.i./kg bw.The following calculationsprove, over a range of assessed body weights, generated RQs will notexceed LOCs or comparable RQs generated from LC50 data(0.104). Residue concentration of 5.8 ppmfor the mouse is for all calculations.The first assessed weight is the California condor,the largest bird assessed, with a mass of 10,104 g:All birds food intake equation (EPA 1993) FI (g/day) = 0.648(10,104 g)0.651FI = 262 g/dayDaily chlorophacinone intake262 g/day * 5.8 ppm = 1.52 mg a.i./dayWeight LD50adjustment (Mineau et al. 1996) LD50 adj= 258 mg a.i./kg bw * (10,104 g/178 g)(1.15-1)LD50 adj= 473 mg a.i./kg bwLD50dose to a California condor 473 mga.i./kg bw * 10.104 kg = 4,779 mg a.i./dayRQ (1.52 mg a.i./day)/( 4,779 mg a.i./day) =0.0003The next assessed weight is the New Mexican Ridge-nosed Rattlesnake, the smallest animal assessedas a bird, with a mass of 85g:All birds food intake equation (EPA 1993) FI (g/day) = 0.648(85 g)0.651FI = 11.7 g/dayDaily chlorophacinone intake 11.7 g/day * 5.8 ppm = 0.068 mg a.i./dayWeight LD50adjustment (Mineau et al. 1996) LD50 adj= 258 mg a.i./kg bw * (85 g/178 g)(1.15-1)LD50 adj= 231 mg a.i./kg bwLD50dose to a California condor 231 mga.i./kg bw * 0.085 kg = 19.6 mg a.i./dayRQ (0.068mg a.i./day)/( 19.6 mg a.i./day) =0.0035
No. 64948.

#### Antique Import Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/4023 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Before the Second Division,

March 8, 1951

No. 55329.

#### Simon Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 162616-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal bags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### J. Dupha Reeves, *as Trustee, etc., Appellant, v.*Edwin K. Burnham and others, *Respondents.*

Ordered, that the memorandum of decision heretofore made herein by the General Term, and the order and judgment entered thereon, be so modified as that they shall direct a reversal of the judgment appealed from and a new trial before another referee, with, costs to abide final award of costs in the action.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T SEPTEMBER 24, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 12 91 4 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 2 :0 9- cv -0 16 16 -RRA RICHAR D M. POW ELL, BELINDA STEPHENS, Pl ai nt iff s- App el la nt s, LARRY A. CLEMENTS, Pl ai nt iff , ve rs us CHARLES GORHAM, etal., D efen da nt s, JOHN C. CALHOUN, R. A. FERGUSON, Defen da nt s- App el le es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e North ern Dis tri ctof Al ab am a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Sep te m be r 24 , 20 10 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, W ILSON an d F AY, Circ ui t J ud ge s.PER CURI AM:

The di sm is sa l of th is m at te r is affi rm ed fo r t h e r e a s o ns se t fo rth in th e Mem or an du m

Opi ni on of t he Uni te d S ta te s M ag is tra te Ju dg e d at edJu ne 8, 2 01 0. AFFIR MED.

2
#### The Manneck Manufacturing Company, *Respondent, v.*Emile A. J. Manneck, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by Daniels, J.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                           |                                               |                           |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                           |                                               |
|                      |                                          |                      |
| September              8, 2005 | By:                                      | /s/              Abraham Peled |
|                           | Abraham              Peled                         |
|                           | President              and Chief Executive Officer |
|         |                                 |                             |
|--------------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|         |                                 |
|    |                            |                        |
|         | By:                        | /s/              Alexander Gersh |
|         | Alexander              Gersh         |
|         | Chief              Financial Officer |

----
No. 41852.

#### Protest 882391-G of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

*337Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

The needle threaders were found to be similar to "those the subject of Abstract 38680. The claim as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained as to these items. It was found that the tape measures are chiefly, if not exclusively, used in the home, but the record did not disclose that the base metal in them is not aluminum. Therefore the claim as to these items was overruled.
No. 61411.

protest 297242-K (B) (New York).

#### C. A. Andres & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of goatskins and sheepskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Nawi Noonoo & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 57, C. D. 1904), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8246 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify the criteria 

for designation of rural emergency hospitals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2024 

Mr. ARRINGTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify 

the criteria for designation of rural emergency hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Second Chances for 

5 Rural Hospitals Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION OF 

7 RURAL EMERGENCY HOSPITALS. 

8 Section 1861(kkk)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1395x(kkk)(3)) is amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8246 IH

1 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

2 by striking ‘‘as of the date of the enactment of this 

3 subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘as of January 1, 2014’’; 

4 (2) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

5 the end; 

6 (3) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period 

7 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

8 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(C) was designated as rural by the Office 

11 of Rural Health Policy of the Health Resources 

12 and Services Administration.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS