alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Pierre Teller v. John P. Wetherell and another.

After the death of one of two parties, a suit upon a cause of action which survives must be brought in the name of the survivor. If brought in the names of both, judgment rendered thereon will be reversed on error.

Nor can the judgment be sustained by showing that the deceased partner left a son surviving him, of the same name, who was living when the suit was commenced and judgment rendered.

*Heard November*19th, 1861.

*Decided January 15th.*

Error to Wayne Circuit.

*W. Gray,*for plaintiff in error.

*JO. JB.*Duffield, for defendant in error.

Campbell J.:

Suit was brought below upon a bond made by Teller to the persons named as plaintiffs below and defendants in error, and judgment was entered on it by stipulation. The case now comes up on allegation of error in fact, because one of the plaintiffs below had died before action was brought. To this it is pleaded specially, *first,*that plaintiffs below were partners, and the cause of action survived ; and *second,*that there was a John P. Wetherell, a son of the -John P. Wetherell named as plaintiff living when suit was brought and judgment recovered. To these pleas a demurrer is interposed.

The demurrer is well taken. It is doubtless true that, upon the death of a partner, the cause of action survives to his associate. Had the declaration below shown such death, and been in the name of William Wetherell, as survivor, it would have been valid. But the action was brought in the names of both as living, and there is no rule of law which will permit a joint action to stand as several, nor is there any rule which will justify a judgment in favor of two plaintiffs to be regarded as in favor of only one of them. Where two plaintiffs are named, no *465recovery can be had unless both were entitled to bring the action at the time it was commenced.

The averment that another John P. Wetherell existed, is no answer to the allegation of error. The plea does not deny the death of the one named as plaintiff, nor does it aver the identity of the person living with such plaintiff, inferentially or positively, nor does it claim in any way that the cause of action arose in his favor. The averment that he is the son of the deceased plaintiff as well as his namesake, does not give them legal identity. The John P. Wetherell with whom the contract was made, was the only one of that name who could have sued upon it, and his death before action brought is not denied.

Judgment must therefore be entered in favor of the plaintiff in error, reversing the judgment below, with costs against William Wetherell.

The other Justices concurred.
No. 54110.

#### Amtorg Trading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 139513-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
#### The Seneca Nation of Indians, *Respondents, v.*Henry Foltz, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Smith, P. J.; Haight, J., not sitting.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of NNN 2003 Value Fund, LLC (the“Company”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:          (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q of the    Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and           (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Richard T. Hutton, Jr.       Richard T. Hutton, Jr. *Chief Executive Officer* *(principal executive officer)*Date: May 15, 2006     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.     The foregoing certification is being furnished with theCompany’sForm 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2006 pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general information language in suchfiling.
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Tony Philipp, the Chief Executive Officer and Paul Schmidt, the
      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of UPSNAP, INC. (the “Company”), DO HEREBY
      CERTIFY that:





1. The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006
      (as amended by amendment no.1) (the “Report”), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
      15 th day of
      September 2006.





/s/
      Tony Philipp


Tony
      Philipp


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





/s/
      Paul Schmidt


Paul
      Schmidt


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      UpSNAP, Inc. and will he retained by Upsnap, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### F. Gustav Fincke, *Appellant, v.*Hermann Funcke, *Respondent.*

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Barnard, P. J.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
#### FIRST BANK AND TRUST CO., N. A., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Mr. Thomas L. Hanson*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Norman Robbins*for the respondent.

January 29, 1968.

Denied.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8308 

To reauthorize the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Mr. HARDER of California (for himself, Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana, Mr. 

VALADAO, Mr. GARAMENDI, and Mr. PANETTA) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 

2003. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nutria Eradication 

5 and Control Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NUTRIA ERADICATION AND 

7 CONTROL ACT OF 2003. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(e) of the Nutria Eradi9 cation and Control Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 8102(e)) is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘2025’’ and inserting ‘‘2030’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8308 IH

1 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 3(a) of the 

2 Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 

3 8102(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘ ‘Secretary’),’’ and in4 serting ‘‘ ‘Secretary’)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 12.2





FILED BY EDGAR



June 25, 2003



United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Dear Sirs/Mesdames:



Re:

Rio Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd.

Form 20-F Annual Report (2002)

Consent of Expert



Alan C. Noble, the undersigned, hereby consents to being named in the Companys Annual Report for year ended December 31, 2002 as having reviewed the matters set forth in Item 4. Information on the Company  A. Recent Developments -- Off-take Agreement Signed for Aguablanca Project, Item 4. Information on the Company -- D.  Property, Plant and Equipment  Title to Properties in relation to the provision of updates of mineral reserves for gold operations and Item 4. Information on the Company -- D.  Property, Plant and Equipment  Drilling and Sampling Procedures in connection with the preparation of the mineral resource and reserve estimates and the designing of the spacing of the drill holes for reserve calculation and mine planning at El Valle.





Sincerely,





/s/ Alan C. Noble





Alan C. Noble, P.E.

Ore Reserves Engineering

Lakewood, Colorado

June 25, 2003
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

John C. Montue,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 04-2663 GEB PAN P

vs. Order

Teresa A. Schwartz, et al.,

Respondents.

-oOoDecember 17, 2004, petitioner filed a petition for habeas

corpus. April 13, 2005, the court served respondent and ordered

a response.

April 15, 2005, petitioner filed a petition for habeas

corpus. The clerk of court construed the pleading as amended

petition for habeas corpus and filed the documents in this

action. April 28, 2005, the court ordered the clerk to serve the

amended petition and respondent to respond.

Case 2:04-cv-02663-LKK -JFM Document 9 Filed 05/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

April 28, 2005, petitioner filed a letter explaining he

intended his April 15, 2005, pleading to commence a new action

challenging his underlying conviction, while the December 17,

2004, petition challenges his parole status. The two cases are

unrelated. 

Good cause appearing, the court hereby orders that:

1. The April 28, 2005, order is vacated. Respondent shall

respond to the December 17, 2004, petition as directed in the

court’s April 13, 2005, order.

2. The clerk of court shall open a new habeas corpus action

and randomly assign it to a district judge and magistrate judge. 

In the new action the clerk shall file the April 15, 2005,

pleading and docket it as “petition for habeas corpus,” the April

18, 2005, motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of this

order. 

Dated: May 10, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02663-LKK -JFM Document 9 Filed 05/12/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Bernard Tausick, *Respondent, v.*Isaac Smith and Alexander Frank, *Appellants.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Learned, P. J.
#### Charles A. Langdon, *Respondent, v.*Rosealgine A. Guy, *Appellant.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, on opinion of Special Term.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105 - 2498

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Emissions Modeling Data Files for the F inal Renewable Fuel Standard Rule FROM: Margaret Zawacki

Assessment and Standards Division , Office of T ransportation and Air Quality Marc Houy oux and Rich Mason Emissions Inv entory

and Analy sis Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 200 5 - 0 161 - DRAFT - 3009 DATE: Januar

y 13 , 20 10 The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit data files which were used in the emissions modeling analy ses fo r the final renewable fuel standard rule . The emissions modeling analy ses are discussed in Section VI of the preamble, Chapter 3 of the Regulatory Impact Analy sis (RIA) and in the Emissions Modeling Technical Support Document . F ollowing is a brief descri ption of the information contain ed on the enclosed DVDs . County /SCC - level delimited summaries for criteria pollutants and (at least) select hazardous air pollutants (benzene, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, acrolein, 1,3 - butadiene, methanol, naphthalene) by

e missions modeling sector for the scenarios listed below. Some county - SCC summary files include emissions for all HAPs supported by the multi - pollutant CMAQ model. Onroad and nonroad mobile summaries are included by month using average day emissions and s eparately with annual totals. For cases (1), (2), (3), and (5), point source inventories are also provided in the format for the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) modeling sy stem. The point "ORL " format of these datasets can be found online at http://www.smoke - model.org/version2.6/html/ch08s02s08.html#d0e43807. 1) 2005 base 2) 2022 AEO baseline 3) 2022 RFS1 baseline 4) 2022 RFS1 sensitivity

with headspace profile speciation change (8737B) - July 12 - km EUS only 5) 2022 RFS2 control case OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION6) 2 022 RFS2 sensitivity with missing cellulosic plants, nonroad speciation & PFCs changes - Jan/April/July

/Oct 12 - km EUS only Attachments
O pinion filed Dec ember 8 , 2016



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _ _ ____ 

### No. 11

- 1 6

- 00 2 5 6

- CV

_______ _ ___ 

### DASI REDDY DAYAKAR AND SAT GURU HOSPITALITY , LLC, Appellant s

V.
CIVIC PLAZA, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 4 2nd District Court Tayl or County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 47 , 6 26

- A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The parties have filed in this court a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In
the motion, the parties state that the y have entered into an agreement to settle their
disputes, and they request that we dismiss this appeal and order each party to bear

its own costs. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

.

December 8 , 2016 PER CURIAM

P anel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J.

, and Bailey, J

.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 7, 2007
    /s/ Heath B. ClarkeHeath B. ClarkeChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Douglas S. NormanDouglas S. NormanChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
EX-32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

INFe- Human Resources, Inc. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended quarterly report of INFe- Human Resources, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur
Viola, Chief Executive Officer of INFe- Human Resources, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of INFe-Human
    Resources, Inc.

/s/    ARTHUR VIOLA
--------------------
       Arthur Viola

       Chief Executive Officer
       Sole Director
       and Chief Financial Officer

       April 12, 2005
Petition for Exemption

Steve Muntz

McTV Station Manager

Iowa Valley Community College District

3700 South Center Street

Marshalltown, Iowa 50158

Office: 641 844-5797

Cell: 641 751-2480

Steve.muntz@iavalley.edu

I am seeking an exemption for Section 333 of the Title 14 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations.

Seeking relief because the quadcopter video drone I will be flying is for marketing 

purposes only and will be used to photograph and film landmarks in the Marshalltown, 

IA area. Aerial footage will be used to promote the area and inform the community 

through our local educational cable TV station (McTV).

The quadcopter drone is lightweight (under 5lbs) and is very safe to fly. I have already 

communicated with local law enforcement and community leaders of my intent on using 

the drone and will inform them each time I plan on using the drone so they are aware of 

its use.

The drone footage and pictures will be used to benefit the community by informing the 

community of new developments in the area and also provide entertainment for the 

community when they see aerial footage of local landmarks. For instance, a new bike 

trail system is under development and seeing the bike trail from aerial shots will help 

inform the community of the trail.

The public will remain safe since the drone is very small in size and will only be flown in 

open areas free of trees and powerlines. The drone will remain a safe distance from 

people when flying.

In addition, I have over 100 hours of air time piloting quadcopter drones and 

understand the safety issues involved with flying an unmanned aircraft. 

Please consider granting me an exemption for Section 33 of the Title 14 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations.

Thank you,

Steve Muntz
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #10829]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Iowa ( FEMA—1688—DR), dated 03/14/2007. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storms. *Incident Period:*
                         02/23/2007 through 03/02/2007. *Effective Date:*
                         03/14/2007. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/14/2007.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 03/14/2007, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. *The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster:* *Primary Counties:* Benton, Black Hawk, Boone, Bremer, Buchanan, Butler, Calhoun, Cedar, Chickasaw, Clinton, Des Moines, Fayette, Floyd, Franklin, Greene, Grundy, Hamilton, Hardin, Henry, Howard, Humboldt, Iowa, Jackson, Jasper, Jefferson, Johnson, Jones, Keokuk, Lee, Linn, Louisa, Marion, Marshall, Mitchell, Muscatine, Pocahontas, Poweshiek, Story, Tama, Van Buren, Wapello, Washington, Winnebago, Winneshiek, Worth, Wright. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is
10829
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E7-5428 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Seifi Ghasemi,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 
| Date: November 13,  2008         |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| /s/ SEIFI GHASEMI                |   |
| Seifi Ghasemi                         |   |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Alegna, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63411

)

Under Contract No. W911S2-21-P-1099 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Samuel S. Finnerty, Esq. 

Lauren R. Brier, Esq.

 PilieroMazza PLLC

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

CPT Natalie W. McKiernan, JA

Robert B. Neill, Esq.

 Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 14, 2023

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63411, Appeal of Alegna, Inc., 

rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: June 14, 2023

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### John Collins, Appellant, *v.*Sarah J. Collins, Respondent.

Motion denied, noth ten dollars costs. Opinion by Daniels, J.