alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
7128.12015 E.nllrg'fSavirgs Scheme- Heme 

### ENERGY 

### SAVINGS SCHEME 

## The Energy Savings Scheme ischanging to Improvethewaywe provide incentivesfor energy 

## saving adivities

._ FIND OUT WHAT'S CHANGING 

# How can I be involved? Choose the optionthat best describesyou.



### " businesses who want " consultants and " householders to save energy service oroyjders 

# What is included in the scheme? There are many waysto reduce electricity.



### Efficient appliances Commercial and 

### industrialsites 

# See what others are doing Featured case study: 

### Llahtlna: technol01ies



### Autonomous Enerav - Llahtlna Energy Efficiency Uparade in Commercial Buildinas Autonomous Energy provided a comprehensive turnkey efficiency upgrade packagefor Pymble Ladies' College, one of the world's leading independent schools. 

### All incumbent lighting equipment was upgraded to state-of-the-art LED technologyand several buildings were also upgraded with smart lighting automationto minimise energywastage. " Read 

### fyll case stydy " See more

## case studies hllp:llwww.8118.raw.p.lLIIHome 

### What's not included



### 1127128f2015 CERTIFICATE 

### SJADmCS

12,459,509 8,914,029 Total Number certificates surrendered 3,567,160 live certificates are yet to be surrendered. QUICK LINKS 

### ELI Portal and lighting products Information for lighting manufacturers New process for creating certificates List ofAccredited Certificate Providers NEWSLETTERS Newsletter- June 2015 30/06/2015 See all newsletters EVENTS & UPDATES Event dates 

### & registration Energy Savings Scheme- Home

Compliance and Performance Monitoring Strategy Consultation Paper 2015 Scheme Administrator Notice 01/2014Additional End-Use Services 12/09/2014 See all updates SUBSCRIBE TO THESE UPDATES 

# I

Enter email address 

# I [SUBSCRIBE ]

ttlp:ltwww.ess.nsw.gov.auiHome 2!1.
No. 54113.

#### A. Gulbenkian *v.*United States,

protest 152358-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
# Instructions

Sample and analyze the particulate matter collected in the hopper from each bag house or electrostatic precipitator (ESP) used to control particulate matter from potlines. Where more than one bag house or ESP discharges solids to a common hopper, a single sample will be adequate. In cases where solids from different compartments of a single bag house or ESP are collected in multiple hoppers or multiple collection sacks, a single composite sample will be adequate.
If a wet scrubber is used to control emissions from a potline, sample and analyze the scrubber sludge removed from the scrubber, and estimate the annual mass (dry basis) of this sludge. In addition, if applicable, sample and analyze the slurry injected into the scrubber and estimate the annual mass (dry basis) of the injected slurry. Finally, if there is an aqueous discharge or blowdown stream from the scrubber, sample and analyze the this liquid and estimate the annual volume discharged.
You must report the results of these chemical analyses in this Microsoft® Excel Emission Test Template. If more than one source was tested, you must make a copy of the worksheet and update the source ID in order to distinguish between each separate source of particulate matter. After completing the worksheet, you must also submit an electronic copy of the emission test report and the chemical analyses. (PDF format preferred).

## Electrostatic Precipitator or Dry Alumina Scrubber/Bag House combination Dust

**Facility Name and Address Unit Description**  **Process Unit ID Control Device ID** * Alcoa Inc. 1 Park Avenue East, Massena, NY 13662Potline SS198 SA398

**Sample ID No. Solid - 446B 5/2/11_____________________**

**Date Sampled Date(s) Analyzed**  5/2/2011 6/9/2011

**HAP Metal mg/kg**  Antimony 0.23 Beryllium ND Chromium 0.39 Hexavalent chromium ND Lead 7.4 Selenium ND Arsenic 13.9 Cadmium 0.78 Cobalt 1.08 Manganese 0.54 Nickel 157

**Sample ID No. Solid - 446B 5/3/11_____________________**

**Date Sampled Date(s) Analyzed**  5/3/2011 6/9/2011

**HAP Metal mg/kg**  Antimony 0.22 Beryllium 0.4 Chromium 0.54 Hexavalent chromium ND Lead 10.6 Selenium ND Arsenic 29.4 Cadmium 1.1 Cobalt 1.8 Manganese 0.58 Nickel 257

**Sample ID No. Solid - 446B 5/4/11_____________________**

**Date Sampled Date(s) Analyzed**  5/4/2011 6/9/2011

**HAP Metal mg/kg**  Antimony 0.59 Beryllium 0.59 Chromium 0.49 Hexavalent chromium ND Lead 13 Selenium ND Arsenic 33.5 Cadmium 1.47 Cobalt 2.55 Manganese 0.85 Nickel 405

**Sample ID No. Solid - 446B 5/5/11_____________________**

**Date Sampled Date(s) Analyzed**  5/5/2011 6/9/2011

**HAP Metal mg/kg**  Antimony 0.3 Beryllium 0.29 Chromium 0.42 Hexavalent chromium ND Lead 10.3 Selenium ND Arsenic 15.9 Cadmium 1.15 Cobalt 1.06 Manganese 0.51 Nickel 161

**Sample ID No. Solid - 446B 5/6/11_____________________**

**Date Sampled Date(s) Analyzed**  5/6/2011 6/9/2011

**HAP Metal mg/kg**  Antimony 0.33 Beryllium 0.34 Chromium 0.48 Hexavalent chromium ND Lead 10.5 Selenium ND Arsenic 18.4 Cadmium 1.27 Cobalt 1.27 Manganese 0.57 Nickel 189

*** Enter multiple control device ID Nos. if the results apply to mulitiple control devices.**
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Bartholdi Turecamo, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

September 13, 1978

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Shaw & Levine*for judgment creditor. *Newmark, Lamb, Dowling & Marchisio*for executors.

OPINION OF THE COURT

John D. Bennett, J.

This is a proceeding by a judgment creditor of a legatee named in testator’s last will and testament, for an order pursuant to SCPA 2102 directing the executors to furnish her with information concerning the interest of the legatee in the estate.

Counsel for the executors move for an order dismissing the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 8) on the ground that (1) the order to show cause was not personally served upon a fiduciary, and (2) that the petitioner is not a *121person interested in the estate of the decedent entitled to such information.

In support of the application, petitioner’s counsel recites the numerous attempts to serve the fiduciary with process and his avoidance of the same in the proceeding to enforce collection of the judgment against the legatee. The process server in his affidavit of service of the order to show cause alleges, and it is not denied by respondent Bartholomew J. Turecamo, that when service was attempted upon said respondent, who identified himself, he refused to open the door to enable the process server to hand him the order to show cause. The process server then left the papers on the doorstep in view of respondent.

Service cannot be avoided by the refusal of the respondent to open the door to enable the process server to hand him the papers *(Buscher v Ehrich,*12 AD2d 887; *Chernick v Rodriguez, 2*Misc 2d 891 [both cited with approval in *McDonald v Ames Supply Co., 22*NY2d 111, 115]). The court has in personam jurisdiction of the respondent.

Respondent’s claim of a lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter is more serious. Petitioner, as a creditor of a legatee, is not such an interested party in an estate as to enable her to invoke the assistance of this court (SCPA 103, subd 36; *Matter of Talbott,*93 Misc 2d 1090). If petitioner were appointed receiver in a proceeding to enforce a money judgment against a legatee named in the will, as receiver she could compel an accounting *(Matter of Pallonetti,*48 Misc 2d 814; *Matter of Talbott, supra;*see, also, *Matter of Tibavido,*Surrogate’s Ct, Nassau County, Jan. 4, 1978, Bennett, J.).

Accordingly, the respondents’ motion to dismiss the petitioner’s proceeding for want of jurisdiction over the subject matter is granted without prejudice to an application by her following her appointment as receiver.
No. 50523.

#### Protests 57729-K, etc., of Stalker Manufacturing Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, -1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
#### Edwin A. Pratt, *Respondent, v.*Charles Appleby, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by Davis, P. J.
January 29, 1962

Reap. Dec. 10160.

#### Mitsubishi Int’l Corp. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R60/22867, etc.

Reappraisements dismissed December 14, 1961. Entered at Boston, Mass. (Not published.) Motion by plaintiff.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00289

- CR

Z ETH D RAVEN B ELL

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appea l from the 485th District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 1588095D )

June 8, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s j udgmen t. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mike Wallach

___________________ Justice Mike Wallach
Exhibit 32.5



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Frontier Global
Fund, a Series of Frontier Funds on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Frontier Global Fund.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Patrick J. Kane                                                                                                                                   | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Patrick J. Kane                                                                                                                                       | 
|Chairman, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Managing Member of Frontier Fund Management LLC, the Managing Owner of Frontier Funds | 



June 24, 2019
No. 56029.

protest 169692-K (St. Albans).

#### Central Vermont Railway, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 99.1

ALADDIN SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.

Form 10-KSB
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002


          CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
       OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002


         I, Jonathan Kahn, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Aladdin Systems Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report of Aladdin Systems Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aladdin Systems Holdings, Inc.



                                         By:         /s/ Jonathan Kahn
                                                     --------------------
                                         Name:       Jonathan Kahn
                                         Title:      Chief Executive Officer
                                         Date:       March 17, 2003



         I, Alexandra Gonzalez, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Aladdin Systems Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report of Aladdin Systems Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aladdin Systems Holdings, Inc



                                         By:         /s/ Jonathan Kahn

                                          By:        /s/ Alexandra Gonzalez
                                                     ---------------------
                                         Name:       Alexandra Gonzalez
                                         Title:      Chief Financial Officer
                                         Date:       March 17, 2003





                                       94
<PAGE>
No. 58625.

protest 152948-K (New York).

#### Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division *v.*United States,

*475Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper coverings containing phonograph records the subject of *United States*v. *Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division*(41 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 541), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Thomas Nelson, *Individually and as Trustee under Will of*William Nelson, *Deceased, and*Cornelia L., his wife, *Respondents, v.*John V. Purdy and others, Appellants.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Gilbert,- J.; Dykman, J., not sitting.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Tammie A. Quinlan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certifies
that (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and its results of operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.



|                        |  |                       |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/ Tammie A. Quinlan
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  | Name:                 |  | Tammie A. Quinlan                                   
|                        |  | Title:                |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 6, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00786

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.V.G. AND I.J.F.,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- EM5

- 07068

Honorable Nick Catoe Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due April 2, 2018. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of

time has been filed. We therefore order appellant Joshua Ian Fusilier to file, by April 16, 2018

, appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief.

If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we will dismiss the

appeal for wa nt of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6th day of April, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEIT H E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### The Merchants’ Loan and Trust Company, *Respondent, v.*Henry Clair, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by Daniels, J.,'and by Barker, J., dissenting.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8344 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8344

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to submit to Congress a report 
on available assistance to agricultural producers in the State of Texas 
  that have suffered economic losses due to the failure of Mexico to 
                             deliver water.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2024

  Ms. De La Cruz (for herself, Ms. Crockett, and Mr. Tony Gonzales of 
    Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Agriculture to submit to Congress a report 
on available assistance to agricultural producers in the State of Texas 
  that have suffered economic losses due to the failure of Mexico to 
                             deliver water.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Texas Agricultural Producers 
Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON AVAILABLE ASSISTANCE TO AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS IN THE 
              STATE OF TEXAS THAT HAVE SUFFERED ECONOMIC LOSSES DUE TO 
              THE FAILURE OF MEXICO TO DELIVER WATER.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to the Committee on 
Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate a report that lists 
all existing authorities of the Secretary and programs within the 
Department of Agriculture that are or could be made available to 
provide assistance to agricultural producers in the State of Texas that 
have suffered economic losses due to the failure of Mexico to deliver 
water to the United States in accordance with the Treaty Relating to 
the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the 
Rio Grande signed at Washington on February 3, 1944, and the 
Supplementary Protocol signed at Washington on November 14, 1944.
                                 <all>
```
No. 61381.

protest 293651-K (A) (New York).

#### K. Kalustyan Orient Expert Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report of GEOPHARMA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the three period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Carol Dore-FalconeCarol Dore-FalconeVice President and Chief Financial OfficerJune 29, 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS EVERETT WILLIAMS, No. CIV-S-04-2428 MCE/DAD P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

MARK SHEPERD, ET AL., 

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has timely

filed a notice of appeal of this court's September 28, 2005

denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. Before

petitioner can appeal this decision, a certificate of

appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P.

22(b).

A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253 “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

///

Case 2:04-cv-02428-MCE -DAD Document 28 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Except for the requirement that appealable issues be 1

specifically identified, the standard for issuance of a

certificate of appealability is the same as the standard that

applied to issuance of a certificate of probable cause. 

Jennings, at 1010.

2

The certificate of appealability must “indicate which specific

issue or issues satisfy” the requirement. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(3).

A certificate of appealability should be granted for any

issue that petitioner can demonstrate is “‘debatable among

jurists of reason,’” could be resolved differently by a different 

court, or is “‘adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed

further.’” Jennings v. Woodford, 290 F.3d 1006, 1010 (9th Cir.

2002) (quoting Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 (1983)).1

Petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right in the following issue(s) presented in the

instant petition: whether the statute of limitations should be

tolled because of delays caused by his trial attorney, prison

job, limited access to the law library, and prison lock-downs,

the failure of his attorneys to inform him about the statute of

limitations, and his difficulty in obtaining legal assistance.

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-02428-MCE -DAD Document 28 Filed 11/10/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a certificate of

appealability is issued in the present action.

DATED: November 8, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02428-MCE -DAD Document 28 Filed 11/10/05 Page 3 of 3