alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                   24,787
<SECURITIES>                             66,733
<RECEIVABLES>                             8,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                             156,819
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        190,459
<PP&E>                                  445,586
<DEPRECIATION>                           21,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          681,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   331,569
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  9,578
<OTHER-SE>                             (133,640)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            681,642
<SALES>                                 464,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        464,582
<CGS>                                   438,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           269,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        212,154
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       25,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (480,846)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.05)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K March 13, 2015


EXHIBIT 10.2


AMENDMENT TO 
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED 
ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES 
(As Amended and Restated on January 22, 2014)
THIS AGREEMENT by Baker Hughes Incorporated (the “Company”),
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Company sponsors the Baker Hughes Incorporated Annual Incentive Compensation Plan for Employees (the “Plan”); and 
WHEREAS, the Company has the right to amend the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company agrees that, effective January 1, 2015, the Plan is amended as follows:
1.    The definition of “Eligible Employee” in Section 1.01 of the Plan is completely amended and restated to provide as follows:
“Eligible Employee” means an employee of a Company, including, for the avoidance of doubt, an officer of a Company who is subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.


2.    Section 3.05 of the Plan is completely amended and restated to provide as follows:


3.05    Individual Award Cap.  Effective for Final Awards earned for Performance Periods commencing on and after January 1, 2006, the maximum annual Final Award any individual who is not an officer subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act may receive under the Plan is $1,000,000.  The maximum annual Final Award any individual who is an officer subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act may receive under the Plan is $4,000,000. 


3.    The second paragraph of Section 4.01 of the Plan is amended and restated to provide as follows: 


In determining the Final Award, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may increase or decrease calculated amounts to reflect factors regarding performance during the Plan Year which were not, in the sole opinion of the Committee, appropriately reflected in the Final Award calculation. For any Plan Year that ends 







prior to the Effective Time (as such term is defined in the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 16, 2014 among Halliburton Company, Red Tiger LLC and the Company), the Compensation Committee of the Board may determine to pay Final Awards that are equal to the greater of (i) the amount that would be payable if the Performance Goals established under Section 3.02 of the Plan had been achieved to the extent required to earn the expected value (target) Award Opportunity, without regard to actual performance, or (ii) the amount that is payable based on actual performance, provided that the Employees are otherwise entitled to receive payments under the Plan.


Adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors 
on March 13, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-922-07-1310-FI; COC64226]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease COC64226 from Tatonka 
Oil and Gas Company, LLC for lands in Moffat County, Colorado. The 
petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due 
since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Milada 
Krasilinec, Land Law Examiner, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, 
at 303.239.3767.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $20.00 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 18\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease COC64226 effective December 1, 2006, under the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above.

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Milada Krasilinec,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. E7-5245 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Marc Kilbride, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Marc KilbrideMarc
      KilbrideVice
      President and Treasurer(Principal
      Financial Officer)March 31,
      2009
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Jonathan H. CohenName: Jonathan H. Cohen Date: November 9, 2015
No. 55324.

#### Thomas J. Gardner *v.*United States,

protest 148400-K (Milwaukee).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8420 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8420

    Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the hiring and 
 rehiring of additional career law enforcement officers for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2024

Mr. Carbajal (for himself and Mr. Bacon) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition 
    to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the hiring and 
 rehiring of additional career law enforcement officers for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Filling Public Safety Vacancies 
Act''.

SEC. 2. APPROPRIATION.

    (a) In General.--There is appropriated, out of amounts in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2024, to remain available until expended, $162,000,000 
for additional amounts for grants for the hiring and rehiring of 
additional career law enforcement officers under section 1701 of title 
I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 
10381).
    (b) Background Checks and Psychological Evaluations.--A law 
enforcement agency using amounts appropriated under subsection (a) to 
hire or rehire a law enforcement officer--
            (1) shall--
                    (A) perform a background check on the law 
                enforcement officer; and
                    (B) ensure that the law enforcement officer 
                undergoes a psychological evaluation; and
            (2) shall use amounts appropriated under subsection (a) or 
        other funds of the law enforcement agency to cover the cost of 
        carrying out the requirements under paragraph (1).

SEC. 3. EMERGENCY DESIGNATION.

    The amounts provided by this Act are designated as an emergency 
requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget 
and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.
                                 <all>
```
#### Luther E. Mansfield, *Respondent, v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

Judgment and order denying new trial reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by Dykman, J.
Before the Third Division,

August 30, 1944

No. 49687.

#### Protests 53379-K, etc., of C. J. Tower & Sons et al. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the oat scalpings are similar to those the subject of *Richardson*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 6, C. D. 823). In accordance therewith this claim was sustained.
| Listening Effectively**John A. Kline**Air University Press      Maxwell Air Force Base, AlabamaApril 1996  Contents
Air University Press Home |  Air University Library | Air University  
* 
Feedback? E-mail your comments or suggestions to AirUniversity Press 

Contents of this Web site reviewedand approved by AU/PA  (334) 953-2014   DSN 493-2014This page maintained by Thomas C.Lobenstein (AUL/LP)  (334) 953-6452  DSN 493-6452Report problems or send  comments about this page  to: Webeditor, Air University Press.

  ThisAir Force web site is compliant with Section 508 standards.* |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
## Phantom Checklist

Preflight:

WX conditions and Wind limits checked to be within tolerance (do not attempt to fly in winds

exceeding 20km/hr)

Propellers securely installed, undamaged and not exce ssively bent (unbend by hand if necessary)

Camera lens cap and gimbal clamp removed

SD card installed

Fully charged battery installed and secure

Place Phantom on level surface away from nearby obstacles, into the wind and facing away from

operator

Power

- up:

Power on WiFi extender

Transmitter switches S1 & S2 in the UP position

Power on transmitter

Check transmitter battery level (solid green light)

Power on Phantom

Perform a compass calibration if your lo cation has changed significantly (see manual)

Confirm WiFi extender has a flashing green system light

Open Wifi settings on Apple device and connect to Phantom 3 Professional

Open the DJI Vision app and click CAMERA.

Before takeoff:

Confirm satelli te lock and return

- to

- home point is loaded (rapidly flashing green LED followed by

steady flashing)

Point aircraft into the wind

Confirm camera control and FPV by briefly tilting camera up and down

If recording video, push RECORD

Observers warned that Phan tom is taking off

Takeoff:

Climb away from obstacles, into the wind and above head height

Establish a hover and confirm Phantom will hold position with GPS

Confirm FPV is streaming and adjust view angle as necessary

Note battery level and takeoff time 

### Craig Hofland

Phone: 715.808.8033

Fax: 877.643.9003

150 Kusilek St.

River Falls, WI 54022

Email: craig@isit2bmarketing.comMission:

Note time enroute and establish a “bingo time” when you must return home to have adequate

battery to get home

CAUTION: Winds will affect this greatly; allow extra time to return if return will be into the wind

Maintain radio and visual line

- of

- sig ht

Utilize a spotter to maintain visual contact when available

Always verify recording status during the mission

Recovery:

Preferred recovery is by hand, especially on uneven terrain or with tall vegetation

Safety glasses or glasses offering ballistic prot ection shall be utilized

Establish a hover above head height and a safe distance away then move towards the Phantom and

grab the landing gear

Once the Phantom is securely held above head level, hold the throttle stick to the down position for

three seconds

Do not move the Phantom to below head level until the blades have stopped completely

Postflight:

Power off the Phantom, transmitter and Wifi extender

Remove the SD card and secure

Any visible moisture present on the system shall be wiped off prior to stor age If moisture was present during the flight, do not seal the Phantom in the case for a prolonged

period until it can be aired out in a dry environment for a minimum of eight hours

Charge the Wifi extender, Phantom batteries and ensure extra transmitter b atteries are available

for the next mission

Download the contents of the SD card, delete from the SD card and re

- install into the Phantom

Perform mainten an ce, check for loose parts, and physical integrity of sUAS
6879

#### STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA *EX REL.*J. FRASER LYON, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. PALMETTO BOWLING CLUB.

Trim, by Jury. — In proceeding to enjoin maintenance of nuisance, respondent is not entitled to trial by jury of facts alleged as constituting nuisance where he does not deny them.

Petition in the original jurisdiction of this Court by *J.*Eraser Eyon, Attorney-General, in behalf of State against Palmetto Bowling Club, Henry Nolte and Chris H. Nolte, to restrain them from maintaining a pleasure resort to which persons are accustomed to go to drink alcoholic liquors as a beverage.

*115
      *Attorney-General, J. Fraser Lyon,*for petitioner.

*Messrs. Simons, Singling*and *Capplemann.*contra.

April *21,*1908.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The respondents, in their answer, assert the right of trial by jury.

They do not, however, deny the facts, which, it is alleged, constitute a nuisance, and as there are no facts in issue, such right is not properly before this Court for consideration.

It is the judgment of this Court, that the respondents be perpetually enjoined from maintaining, using and beeping said place, where persons are permitted to resort, for the purpose of drinking alcoholic liquors and beverages, and from permitting persons to resort to the said premises for the purpose of drinking alcoholic liquors and beverages.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Emmanuel Tsoupanarias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: April 1, 2013
By:
/s/ Emmanuel TsoupanariasEmmanuel TsoupanariasChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and will be retained by Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request .
Converted by EDGARwiz








			
	Exhibit 10(g)


	



	



	1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION


	Director Compensation Summary Term Sheet


	



	Compensation to be paid to the following directors, whether or not executive officers of the Company, will be as follows:


	



	Name of Director

	Compensation

	 

	


	


	 

	Ben F. Cheek,. III  (Vice Chairman)

	$

-  *

	 

	Ben F. Cheek, IV  (Chairman)

	$

30,000

	 

	A. Roger Guimond

	$

30,000

	 

	James H. Harris, III

	$

30,000

	 

	John G. Sample, Jr. (Audit Committee Chairman)

	$

35,000

	 

	C. Dean Scarborough

	$

30,000

	 

	Keith D. Watson

	$

30,000

	 

	


	


	 

	* Note:  Ben F, Cheek, III elected not to receive any Director fees.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M I K H A I L A BD ELN O U R, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70913 A ge nc yN o. A 076- 326- 873 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M i kha i l A bde l nour , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of S y r i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the 

# FI LED JU N 03 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70913 2 d e n ia l o f m o tio n s to r e o p e n . T

ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 53 8 F . 3d 98 8, 99 2 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. A s an i ni t i a l m a tt e r , w e de c l i ne t o c ons i de rA bde l nour ’ s c ha l l e nge t o the B IA ’s 2 0 0 3 o rd eraf

firm in g th e im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s d ec isio n d en yin g A b d eln o u r’s o r ig in a l ap p lic a tio n f

o ra s y lu m , w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l, an dC A T r e lie f b e c au s e it ha s a l r e a dybe e n c ons i de r e d and r e j e c t e d bythi s c ourti n A b de ln o u rv . A s h c r o ft , N o . 0 3 - 7 1 4 8 8 ( 9 th C ir . S e p t. 7 , 2 0 0 4 ) . See Merri t t v. M acke y , 932 F . 2d 1317, 1320 ( 9th C i r . 1991) ( e xpl a i ni ng unde rthe ‘ l aw of the c a s e doc tr i ne ’ one pane l of an appe l l a t e c ourtw i l l notr e c ons i de rque s t i ons w hi c h anothe rpane l ha s de c i de d on ap r io rap p e a l in th e s am e c a s e ) . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g A b d e ln o u r ’s m o tio n to r e o p e n b e c au s e it w a s u n tim e ly , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and A bd el no ur fa i l ed t o pr e s e nts uf

f i c i e nte vi de nc e of

c hange d c i r c um s t anc e s i n S y r i at o qua l i f yf orthe r e g u l a t o rye x c e p t i o n t o th e t i me l i mi tf o rf i l i n g mo t i o n s t o r e o p e n , 8 C. F. R. § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; s e e al s o T ouf i ghi , 53 8 F . 3d at99 6 (re qu i ri ng m ov antt o p rodu ce m a te r ia l e v id e n c e w ith m o tio n to r e o p e n th a t c o n d itio n s in c o u n tryo f n a tio n a lity had chang ed). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
No. 49228.

#### Protests 101852-K, etc., of P. John Hanrahan, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Prom an examination of the papers the court was unable to find anything sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the action of the collector. The protests were therefore overruled.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stephen Grant, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 576]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court properly precluded evidence of a prior act of violence committed by the deceased victim. That evidence was not relevant to the justification defense because defendant did not know the victim and was not aware of the prior violent act *(see, Matter of Robert S.,*52 NY2d 1046; *People v Miller,*39 NY2d 543, 551-552; *People v Doczy,*210 AD2d 425, 426, *Iv denied*85 NY2d 937; *People v Brown,*170 AD2d 963). The verdict is supported by the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). The notice served by the People pursuant to CPL *902710.30, setting forth the sum and substance of defendant’s oral statements, was in compliance with the statute *(see, People v Lopez,*84 NY2d 425, 428; *People v Reed,*84 NY2d 945, 947). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J.—Manslaughter, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.