" ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 113TH CONGRESS

1st Session 

REPORT

113–113 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2014 

R E P O R T 

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS 

together with 

ADDITIONAL VIEWS 

[TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 2397]

JUNE 17, 2013.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on 

the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2014 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

81–454 

" ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 113TH CONGRESS

1st Session 

REPORT

2013

113–113 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2014 

R E P O R T 

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS 

together with 

ADDITIONAL VIEWS 

[TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 2397]

JUNE 17, 2013.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on 

the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(III) 

C O N T E N T S 

Page 

Bill Totals ................................................................................................................. 1 

Committee Budget Review Process ........................................................................ 3 

Introduction .............................................................................................................. 3 

Funding Increases ................................................................................................... 3 

Committee Recommendations by Major Category ................................................ 3 

Active, Reserve and National Guard Military Personnel .............................. 3 

Operation and Maintenance ............................................................................ 3 

Procurement ...................................................................................................... 4 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation ............................................... 5 

Defense Health Program .................................................................................. 5 

Overseas Contingency Operations .................................................................. 6 

Classified Programs .......................................................................................... 6 

Forces to be Supported ............................................................................................ 6 

Department of the Army .................................................................................. 6 

Department of the Navy .................................................................................. 7 

Department of the Air Force ........................................................................... 8 

TITLE I. MILITARY PERSONNEL ....................................................................... 11 

Military Personnel Overview ........................................................................... 13 

Summary of End Strength ........................................................................ 13 

Overall Active End Strength .................................................................... 13 

Overall Selected Reserve End Strength .................................................. 13 

Full-Time Support Strengths ................................................................... 14 

Operational Reserve .................................................................................. 14 

Sexual Assault Prevention and Response ............................................... 15 

Military Personnel Account Funding Reductions ................................... 17 

Obligations of Bonuses .............................................................................. 17 

Carryover Authority .................................................................................. 18 

Permanent Change of Station Efficiencies .............................................. 18 

Long-Term Temporary Duty Assignments .............................................. 19 

Foreign Language Training and Education ............................................ 19 

Minority Outreach ..................................................................................... 20 

Hazing in the Armed Forces ..................................................................... 20 

Military Personnel, Army ................................................................................ 20 

Military Personnel, Navy ................................................................................. 25 

Littoral Combat Ship Manning ................................................................ 29 

Military Personnel, Marine Corps ................................................................... 30 

Military Personnel, Air Force .......................................................................... 34 

Reserve Personnel, Army ................................................................................. 38 

Reserve Personnel, Navy ................................................................................. 41 

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps ................................................................... 44 

Reserve Personnel, Air Force .......................................................................... 47 

National Guard Personnel, Army .................................................................... 50 

Cyber Security—Dual Use Cyber Incident Response Teams ................. 53 

National Guard Personnel, Air Force ............................................................. 53 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

IV 

TITLE II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ................................................... 57 

Operation and Maintenance Reprogrammings .............................................. 59 

Operation and Maintenance Budget Execution Data .................................... 60 

Special Interest Items ...................................................................................... 60 

Restoration of Funding for Unrealistic Efficiency Savings ........................... 60 

Tuition Assistance ............................................................................................ 60 

Realistic Fuel Pricing ....................................................................................... 61 

Military Information Support Operations ...................................................... 61 

Defense Personal Property Moves ................................................................... 62 

STEM Education .............................................................................................. 62 

Telecommunications Expense Management ................................................... 62 

Military Working Dogs ..................................................................................... 63 

Report on Overseas Infrastructure ................................................................. 63 

Operation and Maintenance, Army ................................................................. 63 

Army Training Aids and Devices ............................................................. 68 

Cemeterial Expenses ................................................................................. 68 

High Resolution 3—Dimensional Terrain Data Collection .................... 68 

Operation and Maintenance, Navy ................................................................. 69 

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps ................................................... 74 

Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force—Crisis Response ...... 77 

Marine Corps Embassy Security Programs ............................................ 77 

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force .......................................................... 77 

Cyber Command Funding ......................................................................... 83 

U.S. Access to the Azores ......................................................................... 83 

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide ................................................... 83 

Suicide Prevention Training and Outreach ............................................. 88 

STARBASE ................................................................................................ 89 

Data Research Tools in Security Clearance Investigations ................... 89 

Meals Ready-To-Eat War Reserve ........................................................... 90 

Office of Community Support for Military Families with Special 

Needs ...................................................................................................... 90 

Special Operations Command Readiness ................................................ 90 

Use of Major Force Program—11 Funds ................................................. 90 

Special Operations Command Human Psychological Performance and 

Family Programs ................................................................................... 91 

Special Operations Command Human Physical Performance Program ........................................................................................................ 92 

Special Operations Command Advanced Education Program ............... 93 

Special Operations Command National Capital Region ........................ 93 

Special Operations Command Budget Justification ............................... 94 

Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve .................................................. 95 

Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve ................................................... 98 

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve ..................................... 101 

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve ............................................ 104 

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard ..................................... 107 

National Guard Civil Support Teams ...................................................... 110 

Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard ......................................... 110 

Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Account .................................... 113 

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces .................................. 113 

Environmental Restoration, Army .................................................................. 113 

Environmental Restoration, Navy ................................................................... 113 

Vieques Island Environmental Restoration ............................................ 113 

Environmental Restoration, Air Force ............................................................ 114 

Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide .................................................... 114 

Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites .......................... 114 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

V 

TITLE II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites —Continued 

Environmental Restoration Annual Report to Congress ........................ 114 

Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid .......................................... 115 

Cooperative Threat Reduction Account .......................................................... 115 

Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund ............. 115 

TITLE III. PROCUREMENT .................................................................................. 117 

Special Interest Items ............................................................................... 119 

Reprogramming Guidance for Acquisition Accounts .............................. 119 

Reprogramming Reporting Requirements ............................................... 119 

Funding Increases ..................................................................................... 119 

Classified Annex ........................................................................................ 119 

Aircraft Procurement, Army ............................................................................ 120 

UH–60 Helicopters for the Army National Guard .................................. 124 

UH–72A Lakota Light Utility Helicopters .............................................. 124 

Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance System .......................................................................................................... 124 

MQ–1 Gray Eagle ...................................................................................... 125 

Missile Procurement, Army ............................................................................. 125 

Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army .................. 128 

Paladin Integrated Management (Paladin PIM) .................................... 132 

M–88A2 Hercules Improved Recovery Vehicle ....................................... 132 

Integrated Airburst Weapons System ..................................................... 132 

Carbine ....................................................................................................... 132 

M1 Abrams Tank Production ................................................................... 133 

Procurement of Ammunition, Army ................................................................ 133 

Other Procurement, Army ............................................................................... 137 

Joint Tactical Radio System Competition ............................................... 146 

Surge Capacity for Domestic Body Armor ............................................... 146 

National Guard HMMWV Modernization Program ............................... 146 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy ............................................................................ 146 

MH–60S and MH–60R Helicopters .......................................................... 154 

Marine Corps Unmanned Airborne Electronic Attack ........................... 154 

Weapons Procurement, Navy ........................................................................... 154 

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps ................................. 158 

Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy ................................................................ 162 

Shipbuilding ............................................................................................... 165 

Joint High Speed Vessel ........................................................................... 166 

Ship Decommissionings ............................................................................ 166 

Other Procurement, Navy ................................................................................ 166 

Procurement, Marine Corps ............................................................................. 176 

High Mobility Engineer Excavator .......................................................... 182 

High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle ........................................ 182 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ...................................................................... 182 

MQ–9 Reaper ............................................................................................. 189 

B–52 Internal Weapons Bay Upgrade ..................................................... 189 

Missile Procurement, Air Force ....................................................................... 190 

Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Services Acquisition .................... 194 

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force ......................................................... 194 

Other Procurement, Air Force ......................................................................... 197 

MQ–1/9 Remote Split Operations ............................................................ 202 

Procurement, Defense-Wide ............................................................................. 202 

Defense Production Act Purchases .................................................................. 207 

TITLE IV. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION ........... 209 

Special Interest Items ............................................................................... 211 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

VI 

TITLE IV. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION —Continued 

Reprogramming Guidance for Acquisition Accounts .............................. 211 

Reprogramming Reporting Requirements ............................................... 211 

Funding Increases ..................................................................................... 211 

Classified Annex ........................................................................................ 211 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army .................................... 212 

Munitions Standardization Effectiveness and Safety ............................ 221 

Weapon and Munitions Technology ......................................................... 221 

Weapon and Munitions Advanced Technology ........................................ 221 

Warfighter Information Network—Tactical ............................................ 221 

Malaria Vaccine Development .................................................................. 222 

Systems Engineering Research Center ................................................... 222 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy ..................................... 222 

Ocean Energy Technology ......................................................................... 237 

Highly Integrated Photonics ..................................................................... 237 

Automated Test and Re-Test .................................................................... 237 

Bone Marrow Registry .............................................................................. 237 

Shipboard Lighting ................................................................................... 238 

Coastal Environment Research ................................................................ 238 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force .............................. 238 

Global Hawk Block 30 ............................................................................... 250 

JSTARS Test Aircraft ............................................................................... 250 

Hard Target New Start Efforts ................................................................ 250 

Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar/Moving Target Indicator .............. 250 

F–22 Open System Architecture .............................................................. 251 

KC–46A ...................................................................................................... 251 

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Survivability .............. 251 

Strategic and Critical Metals ................................................................... 251 

Aircraft Windows ....................................................................................... 251 

Laser-Driven X-Ray Technology ............................................................... 252 

National Security Space Program Planning and Execution .................. 252 

Space Modernization Initiative ................................................................ 252 

Space Based Infrared System Ground Enhancements ........................... 253 

Human Performance Sensing ................................................................... 253 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide ...................... 253 

Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority-Serving 

Institutions ............................................................................................. 263 

Conventional Prompt Global Strike ......................................................... 263 

Corrosion Control ...................................................................................... 263 

Specialty Metals ........................................................................................ 264 

High Performance Computing Modernization Program ......................... 264 

Manufacturing Experimentation and Outreach ..................................... 264 

Common Kill Vehicle Technology Program ............................................. 265 

Ground-Based Interceptors ....................................................................... 265 

Embedded Diagnostics .............................................................................. 265 

Semiconductor Industry ............................................................................ 265 

Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense .................................................... 266 

TITLE V. REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS ..................................... 269 

Defense Working Capital Funds ..................................................................... 269 

National Defense Sealift Fund ........................................................................ 269 

TITLE VI. OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS ...................... 271 

Defense Health Program .................................................................................. 271 

Reprogramming Guidance for the Defense Health Program ................. 275 

Carryover ................................................................................................... 275 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

VII 

TITLE VI. OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS—Continued 

Defense Health Program—Continued 

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and Fort Belvoir Community Hospital ..................................................................................... 275 

Embedded Mental Health Providers ........................................................ 276 

Integrated Electronic Health Record ....................................................... 276 

Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program .......................................... 277 

Prescription Drug Abuse ........................................................................... 277 

Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research Programs ............................................. 277 

Peer-Reviewed Autism Research Program .............................................. 278 

Pre-Deployment Resiliency Training ....................................................... 278 

Childhood Trauma in Military Dependents ............................................ 279 

Air Force Acuity Model Training Program .............................................. 279 

Cooperation Between Military Medical Facilities, Civilian Healthcare 

Facilities, and Universities ................................................................... 279 

Thermal Injury Prevention ....................................................................... 279 

Mental Health Access for Servicemembers ............................................. 280 

Medical Records of Sexual Victims .......................................................... 280 

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense ................................. 280 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense ............................. 281 

National Guard State Plans ..................................................................... 281 

Support of Counter-Drug Activities in the Caribbean ........................... 282 

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund ........................................................... 282 

Office of the Inspector General ........................................................................ 282 

Inspector General Vacancy ....................................................................... 282 

TITLE VII. RELATED AGENCIES ....................................................................... 285 

National and Military Intelligence Programs ................................................ 285 

Classified Annex ........................................................................................ 285 

Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Fund ........ 285 

Intelligence Community Management Account ............................................. 285 

TITLE VIII. GENERAL PROVISIONS .................................................................. 287 

TITLE IX. OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS .................................... 297 

Committee Recommendation ........................................................................... 297 

Reporting Requirements .................................................................................. 297 

Military Personnel ............................................................................................ 297 

Operation and Maintenance ............................................................................ 302 

Limitation on Availability of Funds for Certain Authorities for Afghanistan ................................................................................................ 308 

Equipment Readiness ............................................................................... 308 

Women in the Afghanistan National Security Forces ............................ 308 

Procurement ...................................................................................................... 309 

National Guard and Reserve Equipment ................................................ 316 

Reserve Component Simulation Training Systems ................................ 316 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation ............................................... 316 

Revolving and Management Funds ................................................................. 318 

Defense Working Capital Funds .............................................................. 318 

Other Department of Defense Programs ........................................................ 318 

Defense Health Program .......................................................................... 318 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense ...................... 318 

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund .................................... 318 

Detection of Materials Used in Improvised Explosive Devices ...... 319 

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund .................................................... 319 

Office of the Inspector General ................................................................ 319 

General Provisions .................................................................................... 319 

TITLE X. ................................................................................................................... 321


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

VIII 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ................ 321 

Changes in the Application of Existing Law .................................................. 321 

Appropriations Not Authorized By Law ......................................................... 332 

Transfer of Funds ............................................................................................. 333 

Rescissions ........................................................................................................ 335 

Transfer of Unexpended Balances .................................................................. 336 

Directed Rule Making ...................................................................................... 336 

Program Duplication ........................................................................................ 336 

Statement of General Performance Goals and Objectives ............................ 336 

Compliance with Rule XIII, CL. 3(e) (Ramseyer Rule) ................................. 336 

Earmark Disclosure Statement ....................................................................... 337 

Comparison with the Budget Resolution ........................................................ 337 

Five-Year Outlay Projections ........................................................................... 337 

Financial Assistance to State and Local Governments ................................. 338 

Full Committee Votes ...................................................................................... 339 

Additional Views ............................................................................................... 361 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
113TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 113–113 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2014 

JUNE 17, 2013.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. YOUNG of Florida, from the Committee on Appropriations, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

together with 

ADDITIONAL VIEWS 

[To accompany H.R. 2397] 

The Committee on Appropriations submits the following report in 

explanation of the accompanying bill making appropriations for the 

Department of Defense, and for other purposes, for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2014. 

BILL TOTALS

Appropriations for most military functions of the Department of 

Defense are provided for in the accompanying bill for fiscal year 

2014. This bill does not provide appropriations for military construction, military family housing, civil defense, and military nuclear warheads, for which requirements are considered in connection with other appropriations Acts. 

The President’s fiscal year 2014 budget request for activities 

funded in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act totals 

$515,911,915,000 in new budget obligational authority for the base 

military bill. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

Insert graphic folio 01 80986A.001rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

<Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMS ATB 

RECAPITULATION 

Title r - Mil itary PersonneL .. ",,,.,,,,,.,,.,, ... .. 

Title II - Operation and Maintenance .... , ... , ....... ,' 

Title III - Procurement ........ , ......... ,.,.,. , .... . Title IV - Research, Development, Test and Evaluation. Title V - Revolving and Management Funds ............. . Title VI Other Oepartment of Defense Programs ..... ,. Title VII - Related Agencies ......................... . Title VIII - General Provisions (net) ................ . 

Title IX - Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) ..... . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

127.533,073 

173,494,558 100,350,714 

69,928,477 

2,214,024 

35,526,674 

1,048,421 

507,935 

86,954,838 

Total, Department of Defense..... ........ ..... 597,558,714 

Scorekeepi ng adj ustments. . . . . . . . . .. ............ 7,724.665 

Less appropriations for subsequent years ... . 

Total mandatory and discretionary ... ,..... ... ... 605,371,714 

FY 2014 

Request 

130,399,881 175,097.941 

99,106,242 

67,520,236 

2,276,527 

35,461,127 

1,082,271 

158,000 

79,278,902 

590,381 ,127 

7,719,681 

-952,739 

597,148,069 

Bill 

129,649,180 174,974,024 

98,356,158 

66,409.530 

2,141,527 

35,985,467 

1,066,535 

-2,844,571 

85,604,949 

591,342,799 

7,462,000 

598,804,799 

Bill VS. 

Enacted 

+2,116,107 +1,479,466 

-1,994,556 -3,518,947 

-72,497 

+458,793 

+18,114 

-3,352,506 -1,349,889 -6,215,915 

-262,665 

-6,566,915 

B

-7

-1

-7

-1,1

-1

+5

-

-3,0

+6,3

+9

-2

+9

+1,6
3 

COMMITTEE BUDGET REVIEW PROCESS

During its review of the fiscal year 2014 budget request and execution of appropriations for fiscal year 2013, the Subcommittee on 

Defense held a total of ten hearings and four formal briefings during the period of February 2013 to May 2013. Testimony received 

by the Subcommittee totaled 1,063 pages of transcript. Hearings 

were held in open session, except when the security classification 

of the material to be discussed presented no alternative but to conduct those hearings in executive or closed session. 

INTRODUCTION

The Committee recommendation for the fiscal year 2014 Department of Defense base budget is $512,521,850,000, which is a decrease of $3,390,065,000 below the request. The Committee recommendation for overseas contingency operations is 

$85,768,949,000, which is an increase of $5,046,795,000 above the 

request. 

To reach the reduced base allocation, the Subcommittee has reviewed in detail the budget request, and found areas and programs 

where reductions are possible without adversely impacting the 

warfighter or modernization and readiness efforts. Examples of 

such reductions include: programs which have been terminated or 

restructured since the budget was submitted; savings from favorable contract pricing adjustments; contract/schedule delays resulting in fiscal year 2014 savings; unjustified cost increases or funding 

requested ahead of need; anticipated/historical underexecution; rescissions of unneeded prior year funds; and reductions that are authorized in the pending fiscal year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act. The Committee recommendation also restores unrealistic efficiencies included in the budget request. 

FUNDING INCREASES

The Committee directs that the funding increases outlined in the 

tables for each appropriation account shall be provided only for the 

specific purposes indicated in the tables. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS BY MAJOR CATEGORY

ACTIVE, RESERVE, AND NATIONAL GUARD MILITARY PERSONNEL

In title I of the bill, the Committee recommends a total of 

$129,649,180,000 for active, reserve, and National Guard military 

personnel, a decrease of $750,701,000 below the budget request, 

and an increase of $2,116,107,000 above the fiscal year 2013 enacted level. The Committee recommendation provides funding to increase basic pay for all military personnel by 1.8 percent as authorized by current law, effective January 1, 2014. The Committee recommends full funding to support the requested end strength levels 

for active duty and Selected Reserve personnel. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

In title II of the bill, the Committee recommends a total of 

$174,974,024,000 for operation and maintenance support to the 

military Services and other Department of Defense entities, a decrease of $123,917,000 below the budget request, and an increase 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
4 

of $1,479,466,000 above the fiscal year 2013 enacted level. The 

Committee recommendation includes increases in funding for operational training and peacetime operations in fiscal year 2014 over 

the level enacted in fiscal year 2013. The recommended levels will 

robustly fund operational training programs in fiscal year 2014. Requests for unit and depot level maintenance; facility sustainment, 

restoration and modernization; and base operations support program funding have been fully supported. 

PROCUREMENT

In title III of the bill, the Committee recommends a total of 

$98,356,158,000 for procurement. 

Major initiatives and modifications include: 

$1,192,976,000 for the procurement of 73 UH–60 Blackhawk helicopters, an increase of $146,000,000 and eight aircraft above the 

President’s request. 

$801,650,000 for the procurement of 28 CH–47 Chinook helicopters, the same as the President’s request. 

$506,976,000 for the procurement of 15 MQ–1 Unmanned Aerial 

Vehicles, a decrease of $11,484,000 below the President’s request. 

$740,401,000 for the procurement of 96 MSE missiles for the Patriot missile system, an increase of $200,000,000 above the President’s request. 

$231,327,000 for the procurement of 31 UH–72A Lakota helicopters, an increase of $135,100,000 above the President’s request. 

$374,100,000 for conversion of a third brigade set of Strykers to 

double V-hulls, plus Stryker nuclear, biological, chemical reconnaissance vehicle fielding support, the same as the President’s request. 

$186,031,000 for the procurement of 53 M88A2 Improved Recovery Vehicles, an increase of $75,000,000 above the President’s request. 

$1,870,424,000 for the procurement of 21 EA–18G Growler electronic attack aircraft, a decrease of $131,363,000 below the President’s request. 

$75,000,000 for F/A–18E/F Super Hornet advance procurement to 

preserve the option of buying additional aircraft in fiscal year 2015. 

$3,121,365,000 for the procurement of 16 P–8A Poseidon Multimission aircraft, a decrease of $68,624,000 below the President’s request. 

$720,634,000 for the procurement of 25 UH–1Y/AH–1Z Helicopters, a decrease of $29,328,000 below the President’s request. 

$5,140,116,000 for the procurement of 29 F–35 Lightning Aircraft: six short take-off and vertical landing variants for the Marine 

Corps, four carrier variants for the Navy, and 19 conventional 

variants for the Air Force. 

$15,000,704,000 for the procurement of eight Navy ships, including one DDG–51 guided missile destroyer, two fully funded SSN– 

774 attack submarines, four Littoral Combat Ships, and one Afloat 

Forward Staging Base. 

$1,503,449,000 for the procurement of 18 C/HC/MC/KC–130J aircraft. 

$1,640,371,000 for the procurement of 18 MV–22 and three CV– 

22 Osprey aircraft, a decrease of $23,000,000 below the President’s 

request. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
5 

$340,391,000 for the procurement of 20 MQ–9 Reaper unmanned aerial vehicles, an increase of $68,174,000 and eight aircraft above 

the President’s request. $1,842,900,000 for the procurement of five Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicles, a decrease of $10,000,000 below the President’s 

request. $220,309,000 for the Israeli Cooperative Program Iron Dome, the 

same as the President’s request. $100,000,000 for HMMWV modernization for the Army Guard, an increase of $100,000,000 above the President’s request. 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION

In title IV of the bill, the Committee recommends a total of 

$66,409,530,000 for research, development, test and evaluation. 

Major initiatives and modifications include: 

$235,384,000 for the development of the Warfighter Information Network—Tactical, a decrease of $37,000,000 below the President’s 

request. $592,201,000 for the development of the Ground Combat Vehicle, 

the same as the President’s request. $784,823,000 for the continuation of the development of the replacement for the Ohio class ballistic missile submarine. $147,041,000 for the continued development of the E–2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft. $157,937,000 for the continued development of the Next Genera- tion Jammer, a decrease of $99,859,000 below the President’s request. $1,829,007,000 for the continued development of the F–35 Light- ning Joint Strike Fighter aircraft, a decrease of $67,146,000 below 

the President’s request. $302,358,000 for the continued development of the Multi-mission Maritime Aircraft, a decrease of $15,000,000 below the President’s 

request. $379,437,000 for the development of a new penetrating bomber, 

the same as the President’s request. $1,558,590,000 for the continued development of the Next Generation Aerial Refueling Aircraft, the same as the President’s request. $322,832,000 for the continued development of the Space Based 

Infrared Satellite and associated ground support systems, the same 

as the President’s request. $365,500,000, for the development of the Global Positioning Sys- tem III operational control segment, a decrease of $18,000,000 

below the President’s request. $2,867,319,000 for the Defense Advanced Research Projects 

Agency, an increase of $2,232,000 above the President’s request. 

$268,782,000 for the Israeli Cooperative Programs, an increase of 

$173,000,000 above the President’s request. 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM

The Committee recommends a total of $33,573,582,000 for the 

Defense Health Program to support worldwide medical and dental 

services for active forces and other eligible beneficiaries, an increase of $519,054,000 above the budget request and an increase 

of $858,278,000 above the fiscal year 2013 enacted level. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
6 

The Committee recommends funding to augment the request for 

enduring Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychological Health and 

Wounded, Ill and Injured requirements. To address these challenges of the Defense Health Program, the Committee recommends 

the following: 

Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychological Health Research ............. $125,000,000 

Peer-Reviewed Spinal Cord Research .................................................. 30,000,000 

Peer-Reviewed Orthopedic Research .................................................... 30,000,000 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

In title IX of the bill, the Committee recommends a total of 

$85,768,949,000 for overseas contingency operations. 

Major initiatives and modifications include: 

Military Personnel: The Committee recommends a total of 

$9,644,798,000 for military personnel in title IX of the bill. 

Operation and Maintenance: The Committee recommends a total 

of $66,146,211,000 for operation and maintenance in title IX of the 

bill. 

Procurement: The Committee recommends a total of 

$7,187,146,000 for procurement in title IX of the bill. 

Defense Health Program: The Committee recommends a total of 

$904,201,000 for the Defense Health Program in title IX of the bill. 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS

As described elsewhere in this report, the Committee’s budget review of classified programs is published in a separate, detailed, and 

comprehensive classified annex. Adjustments to the classified programs are addressed in the classified annex accompanying this report. 

FORCES TO BE SUPPORTED

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

The fiscal year 2014 budget request is designed to support current budget guidance and the Army’s continuing transformation of 

its operating forces to meet defense strategy. Current budget guidance directs the Active Component (AC) end strength to 490,000 by 

the end of fiscal year 2017, the Army National Guard (ARNG) end 

strength to 350,200 by the end of fiscal year 2017, and the United 

States Army Reserve (USAR) to maintain an end strength of 

205,000. 

By the end of fiscal year 2014, the AC will include six Army 

Service Component Command headquarters and one Army Component headquarters assigned to U.S. Forces Korea, three Corps 

headquarters, ten Division headquarters, 40 Brigade Combat 

Teams (BCTs), and 37 Multi-Functional Support Brigades. The 

exact number of BCTs to be inactivated in fiscal year 2014 has not 

yet been determined and will reflect both decisions on whether to 

re-organize the Army’s BCTs and whether to accelerate the Army’s 

reduction ramp. By the end of fiscal year 2014, the Army Force 

structure in the ARNG and the USAR will include eight ARNG division headquarters, 28 BCTs, and 60 multi-functional Support Brigades (48 ARNG and 12 USAR). 

A summary of the major forces follows: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
7 

Fiscal year 

FY12 FY13 FY14 

Active Component Forces: 

Theater Army HQs ............................................................................................................ 6 6 6 

Corps HQs ........................................................................................................................ 4 4 3 

Division HQs ..................................................................................................................... 10 10 10 

Heavy Brigade Combat Team .......................................................................................... 17 17 16 

Infantry Brigade Combat Team ....................................................................................... 20 20 20 

Stryker Brigade Combat Team ......................................................................................... 6 8 8 

Theater Aviation Group HQ .............................................................................................. 1 1 1 

Combat Aviation Brigade ................................................................................................. 12 12 12 

Sustainment Brigade HQ ................................................................................................. 13 13 12

Fires Brigade .................................................................................................................... 6 6 7 

Transportation Brigade Expeditionary .............................................................................. 0 0 1 

Maneuver Enhancement Brigade HQ ............................................................................... 2 2 2 

Battlefield Surveillance Brigade ...................................................................................... 3 3 3 

Forces Total ............................................................................................................. 94 96 94 

Army National Guard Forces: 

Division HQs ..................................................................................................................... 8 8 8 

Heavy Brigade Combat Team .......................................................................................... 7 7 7 

Infantry Brigade Combat Team ....................................................................................... 20 20 20 

Stryker Brigade Combat Team ......................................................................................... 1 1 1 

Theater Aviation Brigade HQ ........................................................................................... 4 4 4 

Theater Aviation Group HQ .............................................................................................. 1 1 1 

Sustainment Brigade HQ ................................................................................................. 10 10 10

Fires Brigade .................................................................................................................... 7 7 7 

Maneuver Enhancement Brigade HQ ............................................................................... 16 16 16 

Battlefield Surveillance Brigade ...................................................................................... 7 7 7 

Forces Total ............................................................................................................. 71 71 71 

United States Army Reserve Forces: 

Theater Aviation Brigade HQ ........................................................................................... 1 1 1 

Sustainment Brigade HQ ................................................................................................. 9 9 9 

Maneuver Enhancement Brigade HQ ............................................................................... 3 3 3 

Forces Total ............................................................................................................. 13 13 13 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

The fiscal year 2014 budget request supports battle forces totaling 280 ships at the end of fiscal year 2014, including 14 fleet ballistic missile submarines, ten aircraft carriers, 26 support ships, 

seven reserve ships, 223 other battle forces ships, 1,691 Navy/Marine Corps tactical/ASW aircraft, 637 undergraduate training aircraft, 502 Fleet Air Training aircraft, 308 Fleet Air Support aircraft, 257 reserve aircraft, and 257 aircraft in the pipeline. A summary of the major forces follows: 

Fiscal year 

FY12 FY13 FY14 

Strategic Forces ...................................................................................................... 14 14 14 

Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarines ................................................................ 14 14 14 

General Purpose ...................................................................................................... 254 246 233 

Aircraft Carriers ............................................................................................. 11 10 10 

Surface Combatants ...................................................................................... 110 101 92 

Submarines (attack) ...................................................................................... 54 55 55 

Guided Missile (SSGN) Submarines ............................................................... 4 4 4 

Amphibious Warfare Ships ............................................................................ 30 31 29 

Combat Logistics Ships ................................................................................. 31 32 31 

Mine Warfare .................................................................................................. 14 13 12 

Support Forces ........................................................................................................ 21 23 26 

Support Ships ................................................................................................ 21 23 26 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
8 

Fiscal year 

FY12 FY13 FY14 

Mobilization Cat. A (Reserve) ................................................................................. 8 8 7 

Surface Combatants ...................................................................................... 8 8 7 

Mine Warfare .................................................................................................. 0 0 0 

Total Ships, Battleforce (incl. Cat. A Reserve) ...................................................... 297 291 280 

Auxiliaries/Sea Lift Forces: ............................................................................ 102 100 94 

Coastal Defense (Patrol Combatants) .................................................. 10 13 13 

Maritime Preposition ............................................................................. 18 12 14 

MSC Reduced Operating Status ........................................................... 14 14 14 

Ready Reserve Force Ships ................................................................... 48 46 46 

Naval Aircraft: 

Primary Authorized (plus pipe) ...................................................................... 3,563 3,555 3,652 

Authorized Pipeline ............................................................................... 266 251 257 

Tactical/ASW Aircraft ..................................................................................... 1,668 1,688 1,691 

Fleet Air Training .................................................................................. 515 514 502 

Fleet Air Support ................................................................................... 222 225 308 

Training (Undergraduate) ..................................................................... 624 627 637 

Reserves ................................................................................................ 262 253 257 

Naval Personnel: 

Active: 

Navy ...................................................................................................... * 318,406 322,700 323,600 

Marine Corps ......................................................................................... 198,193 197,300 190,200 

* Temporary Strength in OCO ............................................................... .................... 15,200 8,100 

Reserves Navy: 

SELRES/Drilling Reserve ....................................................................... 54,325 52,386 48,941 

Fulltime Support ................................................................................... 10,390 10,114 10,159 

Navy Reserves Total ..................................................................... 64,715 62,500 59,100 

Reserves Marine Corps: 

SELRES/Drilling Reserve ....................................................................... 37,323 37,339 37,339 

Fulltime Support ................................................................................... 2,221 2,261 2,261 

Marine Corps Reserves Total ....................................................... 39,544 39,600 39,600 

* FY2012 includes 3,836 non-core IA requested for temporary IA OCO missions. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

The fiscal year 2014 Air Force budget request is designed to support active, guard, and reserve forces, including 55 combat coded 

fighter and attack squadrons and nine combat coded strategic 

bomber squadrons. The Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile force 

maintains 495 launch facilities/control centers with 450 Minuteman 

missiles. The budget also supports the critical airlift mission, including 21 active duty airlift squadrons. To accomplish the Air 

Force mission, the fiscal year 2014 budget supports a total force 

end strength of 503,400 (includes Active Duty, Air National Guard, 

and Air Force Reserve). 

A summary of the major forces follows: 

Fiscal year 

FY12 FY13 FY14 

Strategic Airlift Squadrons: 

Active ............................................................................................................................... 16 16 15 

Guard ............................................................................................................................... 6 6 4 

Reserve ............................................................................................................................. 16 16 15 

Tactical Airlift Squadrons: 

Active ............................................................................................................................... 10 10 6 

Guard ............................................................................................................................... 21 21 19 

Reserve ............................................................................................................................. 9 9 9 

USAF Fighter and Attack Squadrons (Active, ANG, AFRC) ....................................................... 61 61 55 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
9 

Fiscal year 

FY12 FY13 FY14 

Active ............................................................................................................................... 32 32 31 

ANG .................................................................................................................................. 25 25 21 

AFRC ................................................................................................................................. 4 4 3 

Strategic Bomber Squadrons (Active) ...................................................................................... 9 9 9 

Strategic Bomber Squadrons (AFRC) ........................................................................................ 0 0 0 

Flight Test Units (DT and OT Units with Assigned aircraft) ................................................... 12 12 11 

Fighter .............................................................................................................................. 9 9 8 

Bomber ............................................................................................................................. 3 3 3 

ICBM Operational Launch Facilities/Control Centers ............................................................... 495 495 495 

ICBM Missile Inventory ............................................................................................................. 450 450 450 

USAF Airlift Squadrons (Active) 

Strategic Airlift Squadrons .............................................................................................. 15 15 * 15 

Tactical Airlift Squadrons ................................................................................................ 8 8 * 6 

Total Active Airlift Squadrons .......................................................................................... 23 23 21 

Total Air Force Aircraft Inventory ............................................................................ 5,587 5,568 5,196

* Numbers of Squadrons above reflect combat coded units only (i.e., no training or test info except where noted). 

FY12 FY13 FY14 

End Strength: 

Active Duty ................................................................................................................................ 332,800 329,460 327,600 

Reserve Component .................................................................................................................. 178,100 176,580 175,800 

ANG .................................................................................................................................. 106,700 105,700 105,400 

AFR ................................................................................................................................... 71,400 70,880 70,400 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(11) 

TITLE I 

MILITARY PERSONNEL 

The fiscal year 2014 budget request for programs funded in title 

I of the Committee bill, Military Personnel, is $130,399,881,000 in 

new budget authority. These appropriations finance basic, incentive, and special pays for active, reserve, and National Guard personnel, and Academy cadets and Midshipmen; retired pay accrual; 

housing, subsistence, and other allowances; recruitment and retention initiatives; permanent change of station costs; and other military personnel costs such as survivor, unemployment, and education benefits. The table below summarizes the Committee recommendations: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
12 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 02 80986A.002

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

RECAPITULATION 

MILITARY PERSONNEL. ARMY. 41,037,790 40.908.919 -128.871 

MILITARY PERSONNEL. NAVY. 27,824.444 27.671.555 -152.889 

MILITARY PERSONNEL. MARINE CORPS .. 12.905.216 12.826,857 ·78,359 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE. 28,519,877 28.382,963 -136,914 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY. 4 565,261 4,483,343 -81,918 

RESERVE PERSONNEL. NAVY. ,891,936 1,875.536 -16,400 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS. 677,499 665,499 -12,000 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE .. 1 ,758,629 ,745 579 -13,050 

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY, . 8,041,268 7,958 568 -82,700 

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE, 3,177,961 3,130,361 -47,600 

----.------- ------------

GRAND TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, 130,399,881 129,649,180 ·750,701 

:;::;::;::::;:;;;:;::;:::===== =========::::== ==;;:;========= 
13 

MILITARY PERSONNEL OVERVIEW

The Committee recommendation provides $129,649,180,000 for 

the military personnel accounts. Included is funding for military 

pay and allowances, recruitment and retention initiatives, and 

overall quality of life programs for active duty, reserve, and National Guard personnel. The recommendation fully supports the resource requirements needed to maintain the authorized end 

strength levels for fiscal year 2014. The Committee recommendation provides funding to increase basic pay for all military personnel by 1.8 percent as authorized by current law, effective January 1, 2014. The Committee continues to support and encourage 

constructive evaluations of recruitment and retention programs, 

bonus and special pay incentives, and benefit programs for military 

personnel for fiscal year 2014. The Committee remains supportive 

of programs intended to enhance the morale and quality of life of 

military personnel and their families. 

SUMMARY OF END STRENGTH

The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes a decrease of 40,160 

in total end strength for the active forces and a decrease of 8,180 

in end strength for the Selected Reserve as compared to the fiscal 

year 2013 authorized levels. The following tables summarize the 

Committee recommendations for end strength levels, both in the 

aggregate and for each active and Selected Reserve component. 

OVERALL ACTIVE END STRENGTH

Fiscal year 2013 authorized .............................................................. 1,401,560 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 1,361,400 

Fiscal year 2014 recommendation ..................................................... 1,361,400 

Compared with fiscal year 2013 ................................................. ¥40,160 

Compared with fiscal year 2014 budget request ...................... – – – 

OVERALL SELECTED RESERVE END STRENGTH

Fiscal year 2013 authorized .............................................................. 841,880 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 833,700 

Fiscal year 2014 recommendation ..................................................... 833,700 

Compared with fiscal year 2013 ................................................. ¥8,180 

Compared with fiscal year 2014 budget request ...................... – – – 

SUMMARY OF MILITARY PERSONNEL END STRENGTH 

Fiscal year 2013 

authorized 

Fiscal year 2014 

Budget 

request 

Committee recommended Change from 

request 

Change from 

fiscal year 2013 

Active Forces (End Strength): 

Army * ................................................................. 552,100 520,000 520,000 – – – ¥32,100 

Navy .................................................................... 322,700 323,600 323,600 – – – 900 

Marine Corps ** ................................................. 197,300 190,200 190,200 – – – ¥7,100 

Air Force ............................................................. 329,460 327,600 327,600 – – – ¥1,860 

Total, Active Forces ................................... 1,401,560 1,361,400 1,361,400 – – – ¥40,160 

Guard and Reserve Forces (End Strength): 

Army Reserve ...................................................... 205,000 205,000 205,000 – – – – – – 

Navy Reserve ...................................................... 62,500 59,100 59,100 – – – ¥3,400 

Marine Corps Reserve ........................................ 39,600 39,600 39,600 – – – – – – 

Air Force Reserve ............................................... 70,880 70,400 70,400 – – – ¥480 

Army National Guard .......................................... 358,200 354,200 354,200 – – – ¥4,000 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
14 

SUMMARY OF MILITARY PERSONNEL END STRENGTH—Continued 

Fiscal 

year 2013 

authorized 

Fiscal year 2014 

Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommended 

Change from 

request 

Change from 

fiscal year 

2013 

Air National Guard ............................................. 105,700 105,400 105,400 – – – ¥300 

Total, Selected Reserve ............................. 841,880 833,700 833,700 – – – ¥8,180 

Total, Military Personnel ............................................. 2,243,440 2,195,100 2,195,100 – – – ¥48,340 

* For FY14, Army Active Forces end strength includes 30,000 Army end strength requested in the Overseas Contingency Operations budget. 

** For FY14, Marine Corps Active Forces end strength includes 8,100 Marine Corps end strength requested in the Overseas Contingency Operations budget. 

FULL-TIME SUPPORT STRENGTHS

There are four categories of full-time support in the Guard and 

reserve components: military technicians (dual status), Active 

Guard and Reserve (AGR), non-technician civilians, and active 

component personnel. 

Full-time support personnel organize, recruit, train, maintain, 

and administer the reserve components. Military technicians (dual 

status) directly support units and are critical to helping units 

maintain readiness and meet the wartime missions of the Army 

and Air Force. 

The following table summarizes Guard and reserve full-time support end strengths: 

SUMMARY OF GUARD AND RESERVE FULL-TIME SUPPORT 

Fiscal 

year 2013 

authorized 

Fiscal year 2014 

Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommended 

Change from 

request 

Change from 

fiscal year 

2013 

Army Reserve: 

AGR ..................................................................... 16,277 16,261 16,261 – – – ¥16 

Technicians ........................................................ 8,395 8,395 8,395 – – – – – – 

Navy Reserve: 

AR ....................................................................... 10,114 10,159 10,159 – – – 45 

Marine Corps Reserve: 

AR ....................................................................... 2,261 2,261 2,261 – – – – – – 

Air Force Reserve: 

AGR ..................................................................... 2,888 2,911 2,911 – – – 23 

Technicians ........................................................ 10,400 10,429 10,429 – – – 29 

Army National Guard: 

AGR ..................................................................... 32,060 32,060 32,060 – – – – – – 

Technicians ........................................................ 27,210 27,210 27,210 – – – – – – 

Air National Guard: 

AGR ..................................................................... 14,765 14,734 14,734 – – – ¥31 

Technicians ........................................................ 22,180 21,875 21,875 – – – ¥305 

Totals: 

AGR/AR ............................................................... 78,365 78,386 78,386 – – – 21 

Technicians ........................................................ 68,185 67,909 67,909 – – – ¥276 

Total, Full-Time Support ........................... 146,550 146,295 146,295 – – – ¥255 

OPERATIONAL RESERVE

Over the last ten years, regular deployments and an increased 

operations tempo required the National Guard and reserve compoVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
15 

nents to transition from a part-time strategic reserve to an operational reserve. The Guard and reserve components have used the 

lessons learned over the past decade to identify enduring priorities 

that will continue to support and enhance active component requirements. Significant taxpayer investments have been made to 

enable the Guard and reserve to become an integral part of the 

operational force, and they provide great value to the Armed Forces 

and for the taxpayer. The Department of Defense estimates that 

the reserve components comprise approximately 43 percent of the 

total force but only nine percent of the annual budget. 

There are signs that active component support for maintaining 

an operational reserve is diminishing in today’s challenging budget 

climate. Specifically, the Committee is concerned by the Army’s recent decision to deploy active component units in place of scheduled 

reserve component deployments whenever possible. The Committee 

supports the enduring vision of an operational reserve and encourages the Services to continue to utilize the Guard and reserve components as key members of the operational force. The Committee 

also recognizes that new authorities, such as U.S. Code title 10, 

section 12304b Selected Reserve: order to active duty for 

preplanned mission in support of the combatant commands, provide continued opportunities for reservists to deploy for preplanned 

missions and to maintain their operational skills even after overseas contingency operations have concluded and encourages their 

use where appropriate. 

SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE

The Committee is outraged by the pervasive problem of sexual 

assault in the Armed Forces. Sexual assault is not just an issue in 

the military; it is an epidemic. To address it, the Committee believes that there must be a culture change at every level of the 

military, from the most senior leadership to the most junior ranks. 

The Committee is particularly concerned by the reports of sexual 

assaults committed by those in key positions of influence and trust, 

including sexual assault response coordinators (SARCs), victim advocates (VAs), and military recruiters. SARCs and VAs are responsible for providing victim support and helping victims access medical care, counseling, legal assistance, and victim witness assistance. Recent allegations that personnel responsible for providing 

this assistance and care to victims are committing sexual offenses 

are shocking and indefensible. Similarly, military recruiters serve 

as the public face of the military and the entry point for future 

servicemembers to enlist; thus, allegations of recruiters assaulting 

young recruits are both disturbing and inexcusable. 

Further, recent Department of Defense reports showing the persistently high rates of sexual assault at the military academies, 

where military leaders train the best and brightest students to become the nation’s future military leaders, is even more alarming. 

The Committee believes that more must be done to institute best 

practices at the military academies, training bases, recruiting commands, and throughout the force to increase prevention efforts as 

well as to preclude perpetrators from serving in such influential 

and sensitive occupations. While the Department of Defense must 

be aggressive in prosecuting and punishing perpetrators of sexual 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
16 

assault, it particularly must focus and increase its efforts to protect 

servicemembers from the threat of sexual assault and to prevent 

assaults from occurring in the first place. 

Commanders are responsible for ensuring good order and discipline in their units and should be held responsible when crimes 

are committed under their watch. When servicemembers in critical 

positions, such as SARCs, VAs, recruiters, or basic training instructors, are committing sexual crimes, commanders are also responsible for their failure to establish a command climate of dignity and 

respect in which there is zero tolerance for sexual harassment or 

assault. The Committee believes that the Secretary of Defense and 

Service Chiefs must do more to hold commanders accountable. 

The Committee is aware that the Director of National Intelligence has issued interim guidance for victims of sexual assault 

who seek to obtain or renew a security clearance, which would enable victims to seek counseling for such an assault without concern 

that the counseling must be disclosed and considered as part of 

their security clearance adjudication. The Committee supports efforts to ensure victims are informed of the guidance as soon as possible, and encourages the Service SARCs and VAs to provide information on the interim guidance to victims and to include information on the guidance in military personnel sexual assault prevention training. 

The pending fiscal year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act 

establishes dismissal or dishonorable discharge as the mandatory 

minimum sentence for a person subject to the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice who is convicted by court-martial of rape, sexual 

assault, forcible sodomy, or an attempt to commit those offenses. 

The Committee supports this action and believes that those 

servicemembers who are convicted of committing such crimes 

should not receive post-retirement benefits. Accordingly, the Act includes a provision that would prohibit funding from being used in 

contravention of amendments made to the Uniform Code of Military Justice in the pending fiscal year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act regarding the discharge or dismissal of a member 

of the Armed Forces convicted of certain sex-related offenses, the 

required trial of such offenses by general courts-martial, and the 

limitations imposed on convening authority discretion regarding 

court-martial findings and sentence. 

Investigations and prosecutions of sexual assault cases are often 

slow, obtrusive, and difficult processes for victims to endure, and 

the Services have reported that many victims stop cooperating before the legal process has been completed. The Air Force recently 

implemented the Special Victims Counsel (SVC) pilot program to 

provide a legal representative to give advice and representation to 

sexual assault victims. The SVC navigates the victim through the 

legal process and intervenes on the victim’s behalf when appropriate. The Committee understands this program has shown success in assisting victims throughout the process. The Committee 

encourages the Secretary of Defense to expedite the expansion of 

a Special Victims Counsel or similar program throughout the Services to provide all victims of sexual assault with specially trained 

legal assistance throughout the investigation and prosecution process. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
17 

To assist in this effort, the Committee provides an additional 

$25,000,000 for the Department of Defense Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office (SAPRO) and the Army, Navy, Marine 

Corps, and Air Force for the expansion of a Special Victims Counsel program to every military Service, including the National 

Guard and reserve components. The Committee encourages the 

Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Service Chiefs, to review proposals for implementation of such programs at the military 

academies as well. 

In addition, the Committee fully funds the President’s request for 

Sexual Assault Prevention and Response programs at the Service 

level and at the Department of Defense SAPRO and calls on the 

Secretary of Defense and the Service Chiefs to stop this destructive 

epidemic in the military. 

MILITARY PERSONNEL ACCOUNT FUNDING REDUCTIONS

The fiscal year 2014 budget request for title I, Military Personnel, was assembled using execution data and trends dating from 

fiscal year 2012 or earlier. During the budget review process, the 

Services provided updated execution data and estimates that refined their funding requirements. The Committee recommends reductions to certain budget activity and sub-activity groups in the 

military personnel accounts based on the more recent execution 

data. Funding provided reflects the Committee’s most recent estimated fiscal year 2014 funding requirements for programs and activities within the military personnel accounts. 

OBLIGATIONS OF BONUSES

Government agencies are required to properly record their obligations. According to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), 

agencies must obligate funds at the time they enter into a contract 

to cover the government’s maximum potential liability under the 

contract when the government’s requirement to pay the potential 

maximum amount is beyond its control. Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) circular A–11, section 20.5(b) states that for military 

personnel compensation and benefits, ‘‘amounts generally are recorded as obligations as the amounts are earned during the reporting pay period.’’ The Department of Defense Financial Management 

Regulation Volume 3, Chapter 8, paragraph 080901 states, ‘‘the obligations for the amounts payable to military members and civilian 

employees are recorded in the month in which they become payable.’’ 

The active duty, Guard, and reserve components offer bonuses to 

certain recruits and military personnel who sign contracts to serve 

in the Armed Forces. In the case of bonuses which last multiple 

years, the Department obligates the initial payment in the fiscal 

year in which it is paid, irrespective of the date the respective contract was signed, and then obligates recurring payments, or anniversary payments, in the subsequent years in which they become 

payable. 

The Committee directs the Comptroller General to issue a legal 

opinion not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act assessing the obligation of military personnel multi-year bonuses to 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
18 

determine if Department of Defense obligation practices comply 

with fiscal law. 

CARRYOVER AUTHORITY

The fiscal year 2014 budget request again proposes the inclusion 

of a new provision that extends the availability of up to two percent of amounts appropriated for the military personnel accounts 

under title I for two fiscal years, instead of the customary one fiscal 

year. Since 2001, the Department of Defense has had ten violations 

of the Anti-deficiency Act (ADA) in the military personnel accounts. 

The Committee has repeatedly expressed its concern over the Department’s failure to adequately budget for military personnel, and 

the Inspector General of the Department of Defense and the Government Accountability Office have regularly reported deficiencies 

in the Services’ military payroll processes and controls. 

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, included a provision 

directing the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to 

conduct a review of ADA violations in the military personnel accounts and submit recommendations for the implementation of corrective actions. The report found that while the Department of Defense was generally effective in implementing and sustaining most 

of the ADA violation corrective actions, the Department had not established sufficient controls to ensure that the required corrective 

actions were properly implemented, sustained, and documented. 

The report also found that the Army and Navy did not annually 

assess the adequacy of control procedures established for managing 

the centrally managed accounts to prevent ADA violations and 

therefore had limited assurance that controls will prevent future 

violations. As a result, the report found that failure to follow procedures and inadequate cost controls means the Department remains 

vulnerable to future ADA violations. 

While the Committee understands the unique budgeting challenge that the military personnel accounts present to the Department, the Committee believes that implementation of improved 

control procedures, rather than carryover authority, is needed to 

improve management of these accounts. Accordingly, the Committee does not provide the carryover authority as requested. The 

Committee also directs the Secretary of Defense to implement the 

recommendations of the Inspector General Report, DODIG–2013– 

027 dated November 30, 2012, regarding ADA violations in the 

military personnel accounts. 

PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION EFFICIENCIES

The Consolidated and Full Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 

2013, recommended a total reduction of $146,792,500 in the Permanent Change of Station (PCS) budgets for program efficiencies. The 

explanatory statement accompanying the Act recognized that potential cost savings could be found in the PCS program and directed the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) 

to conduct a review of the PCS program to identify potential efficiencies and to submit a report to the congressional defense committees on its findings. While the Committee has not yet received 

a copy of the report, many of the Services have stated that they 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
19 

have been unable to implement additional efficiencies in fiscal year 

2013, particularly those related to time on station goals. The Committee recommends a total reduction of $151,142,000 in 

the base and overseas contingency operations budgets in fiscal year 

2014 in the PCS program for efficiencies. While it recognizes the 

challenges the Services have faced with meeting the increased time 

on station requirements, the Committee believes there are potential cost savings in other areas of the PCS program. The Committee directs the Inspector General of the Department of Defense 

to conduct a review of the PCS program and to determine if potential cost savings and efficiencies can be implemented throughout 

the program. Based on the findings of the review, the Inspector 

General shall submit a report examining the Services’ PCS programs, reviewing how the Services could implement cost savings 

and efficiencies within the program, and providing recommendations for implementation of the review’s findings. This report 

should be provided to the congressional defense committees not 

later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act. 

LONG-TERM TEMPORARY DUTY ASSIGNMENTS

The Committee is concerned by reports of the military Services 

sending personnel on long-term temporary duty assignments (TDY) 

that do not comply with the regulations as stated in the Department of Defense Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR). The 

JFTR states that long-term TDY assignments must be temporary 

in nature; of reasonable time duration; lower in cost than roundtrip Permanent Change of Station expenses; and not exceed 180 

consecutive days. The Committee believes that the practice of sending personnel on extended TDY that violate the JFTR is a tremendous waste of taxpayer resources and a violation of Departmentwide rules and regulations. The Committee directs the Secretary of 

Defense to evaluate the use of extended TDY and submit a report 

to the congressional defense committees on the practice and its 

compliance with the JFTR not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act. 

FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRAINING AND EDUCATION

The Committee supports efforts to increase linguistic skills in the 

Armed Forces. Foreign language fluency is a highly valued skill, 

but linguists remain a critically undermanned specialty across the 

Services. Specifically, the Committee is concerned by the low number of officers and Non-commissioned officers with foreign language 

skills. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to study the 

feasibility of requiring and resourcing language and cultural education for uniformed officers in all Services and provide a report to 

the congressional defense committees on the findings of the study 

not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act. 

In addition, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to 

conduct a study on the feasibility of a pilot program for Non-commissioned officers (NCOs) assigned to regionally aligned units as 

well as NCOs assigned to positions which require foreign area expertise, including a process for selecting NCOs to participate; the 

role of language education and required proficiency; the role of cultural education; and when in the rotational cycle and NCO’s career 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
20 

such training should occur. The Committee understands that the 

Marine Corps Foreign Area Staff NCO and Regional Affairs NCO 

programs could provide examples of existing programs that seek to 

increase capacity to produce and maintain foreign area expertise at 

all levels. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to complete the study and report back to the congressional defense committees not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act. 

The Committee also understands that the National Security Education Program (NSEP) plays an important role in increasing the 

pool of cultural and linguistic experts in government, and it supports Department of Defense and national security agencies’ efforts 

to partner with higher education institutions to achieve the goals 

of the NSEP. The Committee also supports efforts to expand these 

partnerships to minority serving institutions, including Historically 

Black Colleges and Universities, to improve diversity in the program and to increase the number of analysts with proficiency in 

critical languages and cultural studies. The Committee supports 

continued funding for the NSEP. 

MINORITY OUTREACH

Minorities are underrepresented in the general officer ranks 

across the Services. To build a more diverse organization, disparities in representation need to be addressed by effective outreach 

that will expand the pool of well-qualified candidates. The Committee supports efforts to conduct effective outreach and recruiting 

programs in minority communities and encourages the Secretary of 

Defense to support efforts to improve diversity in the military, especially in the officer ranks. 

HAZING IN THE ARMED FORCES

The Committee is extremely concerned by reports of hazing in 

the military. Hazing is inconsistent with the values of the military, 

and such behavior should not be tolerated within the military. The 

Committee understands that the Services are taking steps to better 

report incidents of hazing and to discipline servicemembers involved in such incidents. The Consolidated and Full Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, directed the Secretary of Defense 

to provide a report to the congressional defense committees on the 

rates of incidence of hazing, harassment, and mistreatment of 

servicemembers, as well as a review of the policies to prevent and 

respond to alleged hazing incidents. The report also was directed 

to include recommendations for implementation of a consistent reporting system for the Services and recommendations to implement 

prevention and education programs related to hazing and its harmful effects. The Committee is currently waiting for the completion 

and release of the report and looks forward to reviewing its recommendations. 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $40,199,263,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 41,037,790,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 40,908,919,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥128,871,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
21 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $40,908,919,000 

for Military Personnel, Army. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
22 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 03 80986A.003

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

50 MILITARY PERSONNEL. ARMY 

100 ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

150 BASIC PAY. 6,751 ,445 6,751 ,445 

200 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL .. 2, 182,873 2. 182 873 

250 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING. 2, 110,476 2, 110 476 

300 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE. 281 ,099 281 ,099 

350 INCENTIVE PAYS. 89,669 89.669 

400 SPECIAL PAYS. 374,353 374.353 

450 ALLOWANCES. 225,840 225,840 

500 SEPARATION PAY. 107,216 107 216 

550 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX. 513,274 513 274 

--------_.-. ------------ - - - - - ~ - - ¥ - - -

600 TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 12,636,245 12,636,245 

650 ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

700 BASIC PAY 12,761,868 12 761 ,868 

750 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL. 4,130 751 4, 130. 751 

800 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING. 4.653 429 653,429 

850 INCENTIVE PAYS. 95,637 95,637 

900 SPECIAL PAYS. 507,912 469,912 -38.000 

950 ALLOWANCES. 915, 101 915,101 

1000 SEPARATION PAY. 287, 133 287,133 

1050 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 976,224 976.224 

------.----- ------------ ------.--"--

1100 TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 2. 24,328 055 24, 290.055 -38.000 

1150 ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS 

1200 ACADEMY CADETS < 77 ,959 77,959 

1250 ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

1300 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE. ,252,752 1 .252,752 

1350 SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND. 707,647 707.647 

1400 FAMI LY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE. 2,121 2,121 

1450 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. 1,962,520 1,962,520 
23 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 04 80986A.004

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

1500 ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION 

1550 ACCESSION TRAVEL. 169,697 169,697 

1600 TRAINING TRAVEL. 126.908 126,908 

1650 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 524,098 497,893 -26 205 

1700 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 693,315 658,649 -34.666 

1750 SEPARATION TRAVEL. 222,146 222, 146 

1800 TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS. 9,887 887 

1850 NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE .. 10,160 10, 160 

1900 TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE. 40,238 40 238 

---.--.----- ------------

1950 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5. 1 ,796,449 1 ,735,578 -60,871 

2000 ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MI LlTARY PERSONNEL COSTS 

2050 APPREHENSION OF MI LlTARY DESERTERS. 960 960 

2100 INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS. 725 725 

2150 DEATH GRATUITIES. 61,900 61 ,900 

2200 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS. 282,863 282,863 

2250 EDUCATION BENEFITS. 636 636 

2300 ADOPTION EXPENSES ... 4,326 4,326 

2360 RESERVE INCOME REPLACEMENT PROGRAM. 326 326 

2410 SGLl EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS. 117 559 117 ,559 

2450 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC). 42 407 42,407 

---.-------- ------------ ------.----- 2550 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6. 511 ,702 511 ,702 

2600 LESS REIMBURSABLES .. -275 140 -275, 140 

2650 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .. -30,000 -30,000 

2700 TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, ARMY. 41 ,037,790 40,908 919 -128 871 

-----.--- -- 6300 TOTAL, MI LlTARY PERSONNEL, ARMY. 41 ,037,790 40,908 919 -128 871 

===:;::;::;::;::::;::::::== =====::::::::::=::::;:::: :;:=:;::;:=====:::;:;:::: 
24 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 05 80986A.005

M-1 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED 

PERSONNEL 

SPECIAL PAYS 507,912 469,912 

Enlistment bonuses excess to requirement -38,000 

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL 

OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 524,098 497,893 

pes efficiency -26,205 

ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 693,315 658,649 

pes efficiency -34,666 

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT -30,000 

Unobligated/Unexpended balances -30,000 

Change from 

Request 

-38,000 

-26,205 

-34,666 

-30,000 
25 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $26,902,346,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 27,824,444,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 27,671,555,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥152,889,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $27,671,555,000 

for Military Personnel, Navy. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
26 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 06 80986A.006

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

6400 MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY 

6450 ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

6500 BASIC PAY 3,934,736 3,934 736 

6550 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL, 1,273 217 ,273, 217 

6600 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING, ,413 796 ,380,596 -33,200 

6650 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE, 160,319 160,319 

6700 INCENTIVE PAYS, 131 ,293 122 793 -8,500 

6750 SPECIAL PAYS, 432 843 432 843 

6800 ALLOWANCES, 127,172 127,172 

6850 SEPARATION PAY 39,244 39 244 

6900 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX, 299,218 299, 218 

~ ~ --- - - - - - ~ -

6950 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1, 7,811,838 7,770, 138 -41,700 

7000 ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

7050 BASIC PAY, 8,610,541 8,610,541 

7100 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL, 2, 789,555 2,789,555 

7150 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING, 977 998 3,977,998 

7200 INCENTIVE PAYS, 103 672 103,672 

7250 SPECIAL PAYS, 877 215 805,215 -72 000 

7300 ALLOWANCES, 590 803 590,803 

7350 SEPARATION PAY, 255,663 255 663 

7400 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX, 658,707 658 707 

7450 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2, 17 ,864,154 17 , 792 , 154 -72,000 

7500 ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF MIDSHIPMEN 

7550 MIDSHIPMEN, 77 592 77,592 

7600 ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

7650 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SU8SISTENCE 764 626 764,626 

7700 SUBSISTENCE- IN-KIND 439 545 439 545 

7750 FAMI LY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE, 12 12 

------------ ------------

7800 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4, 1,204,183 1 ,204,183 
27 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 07 80986A.007

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

7850 ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION 

7900 ACCESSION TRAVEL 102 042 99,742 ·2 300 

7950 TRAINING TRAVEL, 96 869 96,869 

8000 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 272 379 258, 760 ·13,619 

8050 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 301 ,392 286, 322 ·15,070 

8100 SEPARATION TRAVEL, 133 977 125,777 ·8,200 

8150 TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS, 36,790 36,790 

8200 NON· TEMPORARY STORAGE, 1,212 1,212 

8250 TEMPORARY LOOGING EXPENSE, 545 545 

8300 OTHER, 514 514 

------_._--- ..... -------

8350 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5, 956,720 917,531 ·39,189 

8400 ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MI LlTARY PERSONNEL COSTS 

8450 APPREHENSION OF MI LlTARY DESERTERS, 199 199 

8500 INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS, , ,660 ,660 

8550 DEATH GRATUITIES, 17 400 17,400 

8600 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, 124, 716 124 716 

8650 EDUCATION BENEFITS, 18,809 18 809 

8700 ADOPTION EXPENSES, 210 210 

8750 TRANSPORTATION SU8SIDY, 5, 750 750 

8800 PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE, 92 92 

8900 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC), 21 ,271 21,271 

8950 JUNIOR ROTC, 14 069 14,069 

------------

9000 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6, 204,176 204,176 

9050 LESS REIMBURSABLES, ·294,219 ·294,219 

9200 TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, NAVY, 27 824,444 27 671,555 ·152,889 

11000 TOTAL, MI L1TARY PERSONNEL, NAVY, 27 824,444 27 671,555 ·152,889 
28 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 08 80986A.008

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

M-l Request Recommended Request 

BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 1,413,796 1,380,596 -33,200 

Projected underexecution -33,200 

INCENTIVE PAYS 131,293 122,793 -8,500 

Incentive Bonuses excess to requirement -8,500 

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED 

PERSONNEL 

SPECIAL PAYS 877,215 805,215 -72,000 

Special Duty Assignment Pay excess to requirement -7,000 

Reenlistment bonuses excess to requirement -65,000 

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL 

ACCESSION TRAVEL 102,042 99,742 -2,300 

Projected underexecution -2,300 

OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 272,379 258,760 -13,619 

pes efficiency -13,619 

ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 301,392 286,322 -15,070 

pes efficiency -15,070 

SEPARATION TRAVEL 133,977 125,777 -8,200 

Projected underexecution -8,200 
29 

LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP MANNING

The Committee remains very concerned with the manning model 

for the Navy’s Littoral Combat Ships (LCS). Although the Navy 

originally planned for the ship to be minimally manned by small, 

experienced crews, the Committee has noticed several indicators 

that call into question the validity of this model. During the recent 

deployment of the first LCS, the Navy added ten sailors beyond the 

40 core crewmembers to the ship’s crew to help with maintenance, 

watch-standing, and training issues. Additionally, the crew of the 

deployed mission module detachment on board the LCS received a 

crew augmentation of four sailors. The Committee understands the 

Navy is working to permanently increase the size of the mission 

module crew. 

Most concerning to the Committee is that in addition to the increased crew size of Navy personnel, the LCS has deployed with 

two civilian contractors (or technical representatives) on board for 

the duration of the deployment. The Navy has described these contractors as ‘‘ship experts’’ who are constantly available to assist the 

minimally manned crew with problems as they arise. In addition, 

the Committee is aware that civilian riders have been on board the 

first LCS almost continuously since the ship was delivered to the 

Navy four years ago. While technical representatives can provide 

extremely valuable knowledge and expertise about individual ship 

systems, and do so for many ships in the fleet, the Committee finds 

it unusual that the Navy appears to believe that contractors have 

a greater overall knowledge of the ship than the ship’s own crew. 

It has always been the Committee’s understanding that the crew 

serves as the ‘‘ship experts’’ and is puzzled by the LCS’s modifications to this practice. 

Additionally, the Committee is alarmed by the frequency and 

magnitude of temporary civilian contractors on board. During the 

transit to the western Pacific alone, in addition to the full-time 

technical representatives, the LCS had as many as four temporary 

civilian riders on board at any one time to troubleshoot problems 

with systems such as air conditioning, propulsion, and the lube oil 

system. Navy ships are normally deployed in top material condition 

to ensure the ship can remain underway to accomplish its mission. 

The Committee is disturbed by the number of problems this ship 

has experienced on its maiden deployment that appear to be beyond the crew’s capability to handle, especially given that the LCS 

should have been in an extremely high state of readiness. 

Combined, these incidents imply either that the LCS is experiencing more than its share of maintenance problems, thus overwhelming the crew, or that the crew is unable to handle common 

problems and has come to rely on the presence and expertise of 

technical representatives to conduct basic maintenance. The Committee remains concerned that the LCS manning plan as currently 

designed is unrealistic and unsustainable moving forward. In particular, the Committee believes that a long-term reliance on industry technical representatives to perform regular maintenance requirements during deployments that are typically handled by crewmembers is inefficient and uneconomical. In addition, relying on 

temporary solutions, including but not limited to assigning addiVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
30 

tional crewmembers to help with basic duties during deployments, 

hiring full-time and part-time technical representatives to oversee 

and conduct maintenance, and utilizing temporary berthing modules to accommodate additional crewmembers is both impractical 

and detrimental to the efficient operation of the LCS and the quality of life of the entire crew. 

The Consolidated and Full Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 

2013, directed the Secretary of the Navy to submit a report to the 

congressional defense committees on future manning plans for the 

LCS. The Secretary of the Navy is further directed to incorporate 

any findings regarding LCS manning discovered thus far during 

the deployment into the report. The Committee is currently waiting 

for the completion and release of the report and looks forward to 

reviewing its recommendations. 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $12,531,549,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 12,905,216,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 12,826,857,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥78,359,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $12,826,857,000 

for Military Personnel, Marine Corps. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
31 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 09 80986A.009

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

12000 MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 

12050 ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

12100 8ASIC PAY. ,458, 728 1,458,728 

12150 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL. 472, 134 472 134 

12200 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING. 479, 739 479 739 

12250 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE. 61,565 61 .565 

12300 INCENTIVE PAYS. 40,634 40,634 

12350 SPECIAL PAYS. 12 746 12,746 

12400 ALLOWANCES. 43 866 43,866 

12450 SEPARATION PAY. 16 856 16,856 

12500 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX. 110 942 110,942 

12550 TOTAL, 8UDGET ACTIVITY 1, 2.697,210 2,697,210 

12600 ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

12650 BASIC PAY 4,746,121 4,700,121 -46,000 

12700 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL. 1,533,530 ,533 530 

12750 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING. 1,652,636 ,652 636 

12BOO INCENTIVE PAYS. 9,832 9.832 

12850 SPECIAL PAYS. 154,862 143.562 -11,300 

12900 ALLOWANCES .. 335, 728 335,728 

12950 SEPARATION PAY. 73 213 73,213 

13000 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX. 362,126 362,126 

13050 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2. 868 048 8,810 748 -57,300 

13100 ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

13150 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE. 438 034 438 034 

13200 SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND. 296,986 296,986 

13250 FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE. 10 10 

~ ~ - ~ -------- 13300 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. 735,030 735,030 
32 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 010 80986A.010

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

13350 ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION 

13400 ACCESSION TRAVEL. 57 933 57,933 

13450 TRAINING TRAVEL .. 23 061 23,061 

13500 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 209,371 193.402 -15 969 

13550 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 101,809 96, 719 -5 090 

13600 SEPARATION TRAVEL .. 93,399 93,399 

13650 TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS 784 784 

13700 NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE 6,888 6,888 

13750 TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE. 14,918 14,918 

13800 OTHER 3,312 3,312 

~ ~ --. - - . - - - - ------------ ------------

13850 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5. 511,475 490,416 -21,059 

13900 ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS 

13950 APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS .. 751 751 

14000 INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS. 20 20 

14050 DEATH GRATUITIES. 10. 100 10, 100 

14100 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 96,264 96 264 

14150 EDUCATION BENEFITS. 2, 375 2, 375 

14200 ADOPTION EXPENSES. 72 72 

14250 TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY. 3,085 3,085 

14300 PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE. 102 102 

14400 JUN lOR ROTC. 5,035 5,035 

14450 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6. 117,804 117 804 

14500 LESS REIMBURSABLES. -24,351 -24 351 

14650 TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, MARINE CORPS. 12.905,216 12,826,857 -78,359 

16000 TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS. 12,905,216 12,826,857 -78,359 
33 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 011 80986A.011

M-1 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED 

PERSONNEL 

BASIC PAY 

Projected underexecution 

SPECIAL PAYS 

Projected underexecution 

Reenlistment bonuses excess to requirement 

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL 

OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 

pes efficiency 

Marine Corps identified excess to requirement 

ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 

pes efficiency 

Budget 

Request 

4,746,121 

154,862 

209,371 

101,809 

Committee 

Recommended 

4,700,121 

-46,000 

143,562 

-8,000 

-3,300 

193,402 

-10,469 

-5,500 

96,719 

-5,090 

Change from 

Request 

-46,000 

-11,300 

-15,969 

-5,090 
34 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $28,052,826,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 28,519,877,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 28,382,963,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥136,914,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $28,382,963,000 

for Military Personnel, Air Force. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
35 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 012 80986A.012

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

17000 MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

17050 ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

17100 BASIC PAY .. 4,896,132 4,879,032 -17 100 

17150 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL. ,577,877 1,575.177 -2 700 

17200 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING. ,498,352 1,475,352 ·23 000 

17250 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE. 197,950 197,950 

17300 INCENTIVE PAYS .. 206,177 206, 177 

17350 SPECIAL PAYS 303,634 301 ,534 -2,100 

17400 ALLOWANCES .. 134,661 134,661 

17450 SEPARATION PAY 122,844 122,844 

17500 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX. 372,960 372,960 

~ . - --------- ------------

17550 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .. 9,310,587 9,265,687 -44,900 

17600 ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

17650 BASIC PAY .. 8,764,297 8.764 297 

17700 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL. 2,831 .706 2,831 .706 

17750 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING. 610,470 610 470 

17800 INCENTIVE PAYS .. 42,599 42 599 

17850 SPECIAL PAYS. 341,821 341 ,821 

17900 ALLOWANCES. 590,403 590,403 

17950 SEPARATION PAY .. 176,663 176 663 

18000 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 670,467 670 467 

------------ -------- ... 

18050 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2. 17,028,426 17.028,426 

18100 ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS 

18150 ACADEMY CADETS, 69,612 69,612 

18200 ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

18250 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE. 977,880 977 880 

18300 SUBSISTENCE· IN-KIND. 156,439 156 439 

18350 FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE. 33 33 

18400 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. 1.134,352 1 ,134,352 
36 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 013 80986A.013

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

18450 ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION 

18500 ACCESSION TRAVEL. 86,485 86,485 

18550 TRAINING TRAVEL 79,127 79,127 

18600 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 327,304 310,939 -16 365 

18650 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 512,982 487.333 -25 649 

18700 SEPARATION TRAVEL. 169,760 169,760 

18750 TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS. 16, 123 16.123 

18800 NON -TEMPORARY STORAGE. 41 ,132 41,132 

18850 TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE. 30,183 30,183 

- ~ ---- ------ ----.------. 

18950 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5. 1,263 096 ,221,082 -42,014 

19000 ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS 

19050 APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS. 124 124 

19100 INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS. 3,440 3,440 

19150 DEATH GRATUITIES .. 16,500 16,500 

19200 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS. 65,562 65,562 

19300 EDUCATION 8ENEFITS. 209 209 

19350 ADOPTION EXPENSES .. 628 628 

19400 TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY. 5.900 5,900 

19450 PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE .. 1,930 1,930 

19550 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 29 849 29,849 

19600 JUNIOR ROTC ... 16 373 16,373 

19650 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6. 140,515 140,515 

19700 LESS REIMBURSABLES. -426,711 -426,711 

19750 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT -50,000 -50,000 

19800 TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, AIR FORCE. 28 519,877 28,382,963 -136,914 

21000 TOTAL. MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE .. 28 519,877 28.382,963 -136,914 
37 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 014 80986A.014

M·l 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL AOJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

BA·l: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

BASIC PAY 4,896,132 4,879,032 

Excess to requirement ·17,100 

RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 1,577,877 1,575,177 

Excess to requirement ·2,700 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 1,498,352 1,475,352 

Excess to requirement ·23,000 

SPECIAL PAYS 303,634 301,534 

Critical Skills Retention Bonuses excess to requirement ·2,100 

BA·5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION 

OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 327,304 310,939 

pes efficiency ·16,365 

ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 512,982 487,333 

pes efficiency ·25,649 

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS ·50,000 

Unobligated/Unexpended balances ·50,000 

Change from 

Request 

·17,100 

.2,700 

·23,000 

·2,100 

·16,365 

·25,649 

·50,000 
38 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $4,456,823,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 4,565,261,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 4,483,343,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥81,918,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,483,343,000 

for Reserve Personnel, Army. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
39 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 015 80986A.015

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

23000 RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY 

23050 ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 

23100 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 1,578,274 ,543,274 -35,000 

23150 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFI LL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) 39,508 39,508 

23200 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS). 276,721 264,721 -12,000 

23250 PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) 13,225 13,225 

23300 MOBILIZATION TRAINING 7,629 7,629 

23350 SCHOOL TRAINING. 206 138 206, 138 

23400 SPECIAL TRAINING, . 261 ,954 260, 154 -1,800 

23450 AOMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT. 2,034,705 014,549 -20 156 

23500 EDUCATION BENEFITS. 22,687 22,687 

23550 HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP 63,459 63,459 

23600 OTHER PROGRAMS 60,961 60,961 

23650 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 4,565,261 496,305 -68,956 

23800 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT. -12,962 -12,962 

24000 TOTAL RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY .. 4,565,261 4,483,343 -81,918 
40 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 016 80986A.016

M·1 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

BA·1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND 

SUPPORT 

PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and DRILLS 24148) 1,578,274 1,543,274 

Annual Training excess to requirement ·35,000 

PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 276,721 264,721 

Excess to requirement ·12,000 

SPECIAL TRAINING 261,954 260,154 

Recruiting and Retention programs excess to requirement ·1,800 

ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 2,034,705 2,014,549 

Selected Reserve Incentive Program bonuses excess to -18,000 

requirement 

Cost of Living Allowance projected underexecution -2,156 

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS ·12,962 

Lodging in Kind ~ transfer to Operation and Maintenance, ·12,962 

Army Reserve 

Change from 

Request 

·35,000 

-12,000 

·1,800 

·20,156 

-12,962 
41 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $1,874,023,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 1,891,936,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 1,875,536,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥16,400,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,875,536,000 

for Reserve Personnel, Navy. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
42 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 017 80986A.017

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

26000 RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY 

26050 ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 

26100 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24148), 602,319 602,319 

26150 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) 9,489 9,489 

26200 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS), 50,501 50,501 

26250 MOBILIZATION TRAINING, 8,986 8,986 

26300 SCHOOL TRAINING, 55,326 52,326 -3 000 

26350 SPECIAL TRAINING, 101 ,870 92,470 -9 400 

26400 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT, ,006 454 ,002.454 -4 000 

26450 EDUCATION BENEFITS, 104 104 

2650D HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP, 56,887 56,887 

26550 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 ,891,936 1,875,536 -16,400 

27000 TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY, 1,891,936 1,875,536 -16 400 
43 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 018 80986A.018

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

6A-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND 

SUPPORT 

SCHOOL TRAINING 

Projected underexecution 

SPECIAL TRAINING 

Projected underexecution 

ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 

Full Time Support projected underexecution 

55,326 

101,870 

1,006,454 

52,326 -3,000 

-3,000 

92,470 -9,400 

-9,400 

1,002,454 -4,000 

-4,000 
44 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $658,251,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 677,499,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 665,499,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥12,000,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $665,499,000 for 

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
45 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 019 80986A.019

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

28000 RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 

28050 ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 

28100 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48). 233,722 233,722 

28150 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACT DUTY). 30,555 30,555 

28200 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS). 135,088 135,088 

28300 MOBILIZATION TRAINING. 677 2.677 -1,000 

28350 SCHOOL TRAINING. 19 448 19,448 

28400 SPECIAL TRAINING. 18 968 18.968 

28450 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT. 227,453 216,453 -11,000 

28500 PLATOON LEAOER CLASS. 7,770 7,770 

28550 EDUCATION BENEFITS. 818 818 

28600 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 677,499 665,499 -12,000 

29000 TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS. 677,499 665,499 -12,000 
46 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 020 80986A.020

M-1 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

BA·1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND 

SUPPORT 

MOBILIZATION TRAINING 3,677 2,677 

Projected underexecution -1,000 

ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 227,453 216,453 

Full Time Pay and Allowances projected underexecution -10,000 

Reserve Incentive Programs excess to requirement -1,000 

Change from 

Request 

·1,000 

·11,000 
47 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $1,722,425,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 1,758,629,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 1,745,579,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥13,050,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,745,579,000 

for Reserve Personnel, Air Force. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
48 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 021 80986A.021

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

30000 RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

30050 ACTIVITY l' RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 

30100 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24148) 

30150 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY). 

30200 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 

30250 PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS). 

30300 MOBILIZATION TRAINING. 

30350 SCHOOL TRAINING. 

30400 SPECIAL TRAINING. 

30450 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT. 

30500 EDUCATION BENEFITS. 

30550 HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP. 

30600 OTHER PROGRAMS (ADMIN & SUPPORT). 

30650 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 

31000 TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE .. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

672,181 668,781 ·3,400 

104,818 101 ,918 ·2.900 

73,281 73 281 

755 755 

568 568 

149,078 149,078 

295,335 295.335 

388 973 382,223 ·6 750 

13 507 13 507 

55 220 55 220 

913 4,913 

1 ,758,629 1,745,579 ·13.050 

1 ,758,629 1,745,579 ·13,050 
49 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 022 80986A.022

M·1 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

BA·1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND 

SUPPORT 

PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and DRILLS 24/48) 672,181 668,781 

Annual Training projected underexecution ·3,400 

PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE 

DUTY) 104,818 101,918 

Projected underexecution ·2,900 

ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 388,973 382,223 

Reserve Incentive Program - Air Force Reserve identified ·6,750 

excess to requirement 

Change from 

Request 

·3,400 

·2,900 

·S,750 
50 

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $7,981,577,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 8,041,268,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 7,958,568,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥82,700,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $7,958,568,000 

for National Guard Personnel, Army. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
51 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 023 80986A.023

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

32000 NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY 

32050 ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 

32100 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48). 2,400,466 372 266 -28,200 

32150 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS). 557,753 512 753 -45,000 

32200 PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) 35,718 35,718 

32250 SCHOOL TRAINING. 576,399 576, 399 

32300 SPECIAL TRAINING. 665.242 655 742 -9,500 

32350 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT. 779,017 3,779,017 

32400 EDUCATION BENEFITS. 26,673 26,673 

32450 TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .. 8,041,268 7,958,568 -82,100 

33000 TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY. 041,268 7.958.568 -82,100 
52 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 024 80986A.024

M-1 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars) 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND 

SUPPORT 

PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and DRILLS 24148) 2,400,466 2,372,266 

Clothing Initial Issue and Replacement excess to -28,200 

requirement 

PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 557,753 512,753 

Projected underexecution -45,000 

SPECIAL TRAINING 665,242 655,742 

Excess to requirement -9,500 

Change from 

Request 

-28,200 

-45,000 

-9,500 
53 

CYBER SECURITY—DUAL USE CYBER INCIDENT RESPONSE TEAMS

Cyber security is an important and growing mission area, and 

the National Guard has unique access to a wealth of information 

technology talent within its ranks as well as unique cyber support 

capabilities associated with both its Federal and State Active Duty 

statutes. The President’s executive order dated February 12, 2013, 

Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, focuses on enhancing the resiliency and security of the Nation’s critical infrastructure. This will be achieved through a ‘‘partnership with the owners 

and operators of critical infrastructure to improve cybersecurity information sharing and collaboratively develop and implement riskbased standards.’’ 

The Committee recognizes that the National Guard can fill the 

roles denoted in the President’s executive order. As dual use, cyber 

incident response teams, the Guard would focus on forensic analysis and defensive cyber operations, providing all purpose ‘‘triage’’ 

of local/state network incidents. The Committee recognizes that 

these Guard teams may provide aid to civil authorities in Title 32, 

Title 10, and State Active Duty status and should be regionally located near established key infrastructure nodes for the internet to 

leverage their capabilities. 

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $3,153,990,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 3,177,961,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 3,130,361,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥47,600,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,130,361,000 

for National Guard Personnel, Air Force. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
54 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 025 80986A.025

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

34000 NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

34050 ACTIVITY ,; RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 

34100 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 943,573 913,573 -30,000 

34150 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS), 111,468 109,468 -2,000 

34200 PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS)", 006 5,006 

34250 SCHOOL TRAINING 250 327 250,327 

34300 SPECIAL TRAINING, 165,588 165,588 

34350 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT, 1,684,563 ,668,963 -15,600 

34400 EDUCATION BENEFITS, 17,436 17 436 

34450 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY " 3,177,961 3,130361 -47,600 

35000 TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE, 3,177,961 3,130,361 -47,600 
55 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 026 80986A.026

M-1 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND 

SUPPORT 

PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and DRILLS 24/48) 943,573 913,573 

Travel, Active Duty for Training, projected underexecutlon -30,000 

PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 111,468 109,468 

Projected underexecution -2,000 

ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1,684,563 1,668,963 

Full Time Pay and Allowances projected underexecution -15,600 

Change from 

Request 

-30,000 

-2,000 

-15,600 

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(57) 

TITLE II 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

The fiscal year 2014 budget request for programs funded in title 

II of the Committee bill, Operation and Maintenance, is 

$175,097,941,000 in new budget authority. The Committee recommendation provides $174,974,024,000 for the operation and 

maintenance accounts. These appropriations finance the costs of 

operating and maintaining the Armed Forces, including the reserve 

components and related support activities of the Department of Defense. Included is readiness training, services for maintenance of 

equipment, fuel, supplies, spare parts for weapons and equipment, 

the day-to-day operations of military bases, facility sustainment 

and repair, and civilian pay. Financial requirements are influenced 

by many factors, including force levels, such as the number of aircraft squadrons, Army and Marine Corps divisions, installations, 

military personnel end strength and deployments, rates of operational activity, and the quantity, complexity, and age of equipment such as aircraft, ships, missiles, and tanks. The Committee 

does not provide funding for a proposed civilian pay raise in fiscal 

year 2014. 

The table below summarizes the Committee recommendations: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
58 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 027 80986a.027

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

RECAPITULATION 

OPERATION & MAl NTENANCE , ARMY, ' 35,073,077 35,183,796 +110,719 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY. , 39,945,237 40,127,402 +182,165 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARl NE CORPS, 6,254,650 6,298,757 +44,107 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE. 37,270,842 37,438,701 +167,859 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE, ' 32,997,693 32,301,685 -696,008 

OPERATION & MAl NTENANCE , ARMY RESERVE, 3,095,036 3,199,151 +104,115 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE, 1,197 752 1,200,283 +2,531 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE, 263 317 266,561 +3 244 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE, 3,164,607 3,149,046 -15 561 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, 7,054,196 7,102,113 +47 917 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD, 6,566,004 6,675 999 +109,995 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER ACCOUNT, 5,000 -5,000 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES. 13,606 13,606 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY, 298,815 298,815 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY, 316,103 316,103 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE, , 439,820 439,820 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE-WIDE, 10,757 10,757 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, FORMERLY USED DEF. SITES" 237,443 262,443 +25 000 

OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID. 109,500 109,500 

COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT, 528,455 528,455 

DOD ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FUND, 256,031 51,031 -205,000 

GRAND TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 175,097,941 174,974,024 -123,917 
59 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REPROGRAMMINGS

The Secretary of Defense is directed to submit the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414) for each of the fiscal year 2014 appropriation accounts not later than 60 days after the enactment of 

this Act. The Secretary of Defense is prohibited from executing any 

reprogramming or transfer of funds for any purpose other than 

originally appropriated until the aforementioned report is submitted to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. 

The Secretary of Defense is directed to use the normal prior approval reprogramming procedures to transfer funds in the Services’ 

operation and maintenance accounts between O–1 budget activities 

in excess of $15,000,000. In addition, the Secretary of Defense 

should follow prior approval reprogramming procedures for transfers in excess of $15,000,000 out of the following budget sub-activities: 

Army: 

Maneuver units 

Modular support brigades 

Land forces operations support 

Force readiness operations support 

Land forces depot maintenance 

Base operations support 

Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization 

Navy: 

Aircraft depot maintenance 

Ship depot maintenance 

Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization 

Marine Corps: 

Depot maintenance 

Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization 

Air Force: 

Primary combat forces 

Combat enhancement forces 

Combat communications 

Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization 

Operating forces depot maintenance 

Mobilization depot maintenance 

Training and recruiting depot maintenance 

Administration and service-wide depot maintenance 

Air Force Reserve: 

Depot maintenance 

Air National Guard: 

Depot maintenance 

Finally, the Secretary of Defense should follow prior approval reprogramming procedures for transfers in excess of $15,000,000 into 

the following budget sub-activity: 

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard: 

Other personnel support/recruiting and advertising 

With respect to Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, proposed transfers of funds to or from the levels specified for defense 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
60 

agencies in excess of $15,000,000 shall be subject to prior approval 

reprogramming procedures. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET EXECUTION DATA

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to continue to 

provide the congressional defense committees with quarterly budget execution data. Such data should be provided not later than 45 

days after the close of each quarter of the fiscal year, and should 

be provided for each O–1 budget activity, activity group, and subactivity group for each of the active, defense-wide, reserve, and National Guard components. For each O–1 budget activity, activity 

group, and sub-activity group, these reports should include the 

budget request and actual obligation amount; the distribution of 

unallocated congressional adjustments to the budget request; all 

adjustments made by the Department in establishing the Base for 

Reprogramming (DD Form 1414) report; all adjustments resulting 

from below threshold reprogrammings; and all adjustments resulting from prior approval reprogramming requests. 

SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS

Items for which additional funds have been provided as shown in 

the project level tables or in paragraphs using the phrase ‘‘only for’’ 

or ‘‘only to’’ in this report are congressional interest items for the 

purpose of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of 

these items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated 

amount specifically addressed in the Committee report. These 

items remain special interest items whether or not they are repeated in a subsequent conference report. 

RESTORATION OF FUNDING FOR UNREALISTIC EFFICIENCY SAVINGS

The report accompanying the House version of the Department 

of Defense Appropriations Act, 2012 included language expressing 

the Committee’s concern over many of the Department of Defense’s 

proposed efficiency savings. In particular, the report stated that 

‘‘more troubling were instances in which underfunding valid requirements were claimed as efficiencies,’’ including the decision to 

underfund base facility sustainment requirements and claim the 

reductions as infrastructure savings. In fiscal year 2013 and again 

in fiscal year 2014, the Department requests reduced funding for 

facility sustainment requirements and claims the reduction as infrastructure savings rather than deferral of maintenance. In fiscal 

year 2014, the Committee once again restores funding to the Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization programs for the 

individual Services, the Guard and reserve components, and the 

Services’ medical facilities. 

TUITION ASSISTANCE

Military tuition assistance has been an important benefit available to servicemembers since the late 1940s. Tuition assistance is 

a benefit paid to eligible members of the Army, Navy, Marine 

Corps, and Air Force for college courses to support a member’s professional and personal self-development goals. The courses are to 

be taken during the member’s off-duty hours, and the total cost per 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
61 

member is capped at $4,500 per year. The Committee believes that 

tuition assistance is a valuable recruiting and retention program 

and therefore designates it as a congressional special interest item. 

The Committee sets a funding floor for fiscal year 2014 expenditures as follows: 

Army .................................................................................................... $195,000,000 

Navy .................................................................................................... 90,000,000 

Marine Corps ...................................................................................... 44,000,000 

Air Force .............................................................................................. 116,000,000 

Army Reserve ...................................................................................... 40,000,000 

Air Force Reserve ............................................................................... 8,000,000 

Army National Guard ........................................................................ 72,000,000 

Air National Guard ............................................................................ 5,000,000 

Total ............................................................................................. 570,000,000 

REALISTIC FUEL PRICING

The Committee is concerned with the Department’s habitual 

underfunding of fuel costs in its budget requests, which causes the 

need for significant reprogramming of funds in the year of budget 

execution. In fiscal year 2012, $1,000,000,000 was reprogrammed to 

correct for understated fuel costs and in fiscal year 2013, 

$1,100,000,000 has been requested for the same purpose. It appears that fuel costs are again understated in the fiscal year 2014 

budget request. The Government Accountability Office has estimated that the fiscal year 2014 fuel costs are understated by 

$536,000,000. The Committee believes the Department should reset 

the fuel rate charged to the customer in fiscal year 2014 in line 

with expected market rates. The Committee has increased funding 

in the operation and maintenance customer accounts to pay for the 

expected market rate recommended by the Government Accountability Office. 

MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS

The Committee appreciates the significant oversight and attention the Department has given to address the Committee’s concern 

that funding for Military Information Support Operations (MISO), 

activities only be used to fulfill core military activities rather than 

duplicate programs and activities more appropriately conducted by 

other departments and agencies. Therefore, the Committee recommends funding for these programs at the levels requested. The 

allocation of funds by combatant command and funding levels for 

certain programs is specifically delineated in the classified annex 

to this report. The delineations shall be considered a congressional 

special interest item, and any deviations from the allocations are 

subject to sections 8005, 8006, and 9002 of this Act. 

The Secretary of Defense is also directed to submit a report not 

later than 30 days after the enactment of this Act, to the House 

and Senate Appropriations Committees detailing the proposed execution of the funding provided for these programs. This report shall 

include the program name, activity, a description of service, target 

audience, goals/objectives, attribution, measures of effectiveness, 

prior year obligations and expenditures, and the estimated budget 

for the year of execution. This report, and the delineation of each 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
62 

program, project, and activity, shall serve as the basis for reprogramming in accordance with section 8006 of this Act. 

DEFENSE PERSONAL PROPERTY MOVES

The Committee has a long-standing interest in the quality of life 

of military members and their families and understands the tremendous challenges associated with completing frequent defense 

personal property moves. The Committee is aware that the Department of Defense has successfully shifted from the Transportation 

Operational Personal Property Standard System to the Defense 

Personal Property Program and commends the improvements to 

cost efficiency, to the claims experience, and in family satisfaction. 

Benefits of the Defense Personal Property Program include full replacement and repair value for damaged or lost household goods at 

no additional cost; on-line claims filing and direct claims settlement 

between members/employees and transportation service providers; 

best value acquisition of transportation services; improved communications between customers and transportation service providers; 

and a web-based entitlements counseling option. The Committee 

commends the improvements that the Department and its transportation service providers have made to reduce costs and improve 

the quality of each military move. 

STEM EDUCATION

The Committee is concerned about the future of the Nation’s 

workforce, specifically for science, technology, engineering, and 

math (STEM) disciplines. These skills are vital to the Department 

of Defense to maintain United States military superiority. While 

these skills are underrepresented in the available workforce, minorities especially are underrepresented in these skill sets both in 

the current workforce and at university levels. The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to develop a long-term plan to 

maintain and grow the STEM workforce and to support the development of STEM skill sets, especially in undergraduate and graduate programs, and to focus on increasing the participation and 

success of minority students through engaged mentoring, enriched 

research experiences, and opportunities to publish, present, and 

network. The Committee also encourages the Secretary of Defense 

and the Director of National Intelligence to communicate to the 

congressional defense committees the resources, incentives, and 

legal and regulatory flexibility needed to attract and maintain a 

proficient STEM workforce. These factors, along with peer-to-peer 

mentoring, have proven to be a successful model for minority education. 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS EXPENSE MANAGEMENT

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, directed the Secretary of Defense to complete a study and assess the feasibility of 

using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) telecommunication expense 

management solutions to improve enterprise visibility over the Department’s telecommunications expenses and identify possible efficiencies in this growing technological area. Since that study was 

completed, the Department of Defense Chief Information Officer 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
63 

(CIO) promulgated guidance regarding the use of these management solutions. The Committee is concerned that the military Services are not yet in compliance with the CIO’s guidance. Therefore, 

the Committee recommends that the Secretary of Defense defer 

new large telecommunications contracts until the Department has 

begun to proactively manage telecommunications usage utilizing 

competitively awarded COTS expense management solutions in accordance with the CIO guidance. 

MILITARY WORKING DOGS

The use of canines to help locate and clear Improvised Explosive 

Devices has been highly successful, has saved lives, and has prevented injuries to deployed servicemembers. While military working dog teams have played an important role in national security 

over the past decade, the Committee is concerned that no widely 

accepted standards or protocols have been developed to ensure consistency and uniform quality in the breeding, training, conditioning, and deployment of military working dog teams. The Committee therefore urges the Secretary of the Air Force, the executive 

agent for the military working dog program, to work with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, in conjunction with 

subject matter experts in academia and the private sector, to develop breeding, training, conditioning and deployment standards, 

and protocols for military working dog teams. 

REPORT ON OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a report not later than 365 days after the enactment of this Act to the 

congressional defense committees that inventories United States 

military installations located overseas. The report should include 

an assessment of the requirements for overseas military force 

structure and infrastructure, as well as an inventory of potentially 

excess infrastructure and any opportunities for consolidation. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $35,409,260,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 35,073,077,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 35,183,796,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +110,719,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $35,183,796,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Army. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
64 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 028 here 80986A.028

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

LAND FORCES 

10 MANEUVER UNITS. 

20 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES. 

30 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES. 

40 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS. 

50 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .. 

60 AVIATION ASSETS. 

LAND FORCES READINESS 

70 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 

80 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS REAOINESS. 

90 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE. 

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION. 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS. 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDER'S CORE OPERATIONS. 

170 COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION 

MOBILITY OPERATIONS 

180 STRATEGIC MOBILITY. 

190 ARMY PREPOSITlONED STOCKS. 

200 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENOED REQUEST 

888,114 888, 114 

72,624 72 624 

617,402 617,402 

602,262 602,262 

,032 484 1,032 484 

1,287 462 1.287 462 

3,559,656 537,030 -22,626 

454,477 454,477 

1,481,156 ,481,156 

7,278,154 7,278,154 

754,712 2,974 712 +220,000 

425,271 425 271 

185,064 185,064 

463,270 463,270 

21,102,108 21,299,482 +197,374 

360,240 360,240 

192,105 192,105 

7,101 7,101 

559,446 559,446 
65 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 29 here 80986A.029

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

ACCESSION TRAINING 

210 OFFICER ACQUISITION, 115,992 115,992 

220 RECRUIT TRAINING, 52 323 52,323 

230 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING, 43,589 43,589 

240 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS, 453 J45 453J45 

BASIC SKILL AND ADVANCED TRAINING 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING, 1,034,495 1,034 495 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING, 1,016,876 ,016,876 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATJON, 186,565 186,565 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT, 652,514 652,514 

RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION 

290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING, 485 500 485,500 

300 EXAMINING, 170 912 170 912 

310 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION, 251 ,523 251 ,523 

320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 184 422 182 422 -2,000 

330 JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS, 181,105 171 ,816 -9,289 

------------ ------------ ------------

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3, 4,829,561 4,818,272 -11,289 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

340 SECURITY PROGRAMS, 1,023,946 1,020,113 -3,833 

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION, 690,089 630,089 -60,000 

360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES, 774, 120 774,120 

370 LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES, 651 ,765 651 J65 

380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT, 453,051 453 051 
66 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 30 here 80986A.030

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT 

390 ADMINISTRATION. 487 737 460,955 -26 ,782 

400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS. 1,563, 115 .563,115 

410 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT. 326,853 326,853 

420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT .. 234,364 234 364 

430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT. 1.212 091 ,216 991 +4 900 

440 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES. 243,540 243,540 

450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT. 241 ,101 241 ,101 

460 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 226 291 226 291 

SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS 

460 SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS. 426,651 457 900 +31,249 

470 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS. 27,248 27 248 

------------

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. 8,581 ,962 527 496 -54,466 

OVERSTATEMENT OF TRAVEL COSTS. -112,000 -112.000 

INCREASE TO SUPPORT REALISTIC FUEL COSTS. 91,100 +91,100 

============ ============ 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY. 35,073,077 35,183,796 +110.719 

============ ============ ============ 
67 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 31 here 80986A.031

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

0-1 Request Recommended Request 

121 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 3,559,656 3,537,030 -22,626 

Overstatement of Missile Defense Agency transfer for 

support operations and sustainment of fOUf fOlWard 

based mode radars ·9,336 

Remove one~time fiscal year 2013 cost for hardware 

replacement for Program Executive Office, Simulation, 

Training and Instrumentation ·13,290 

FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & 

132 MODERNIZATION 2,754,712 2,974,712 220,000 

Funds for infrastructure upgrade of the Arlington National 

Cemetery to be appropriated to Cemeteria! Expenses, 

Army ·25,000 

Restore unjustified efficiency reduction 245,000 

334 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 184,422 182,422 -2,000 

Overstatement of Army civilian end strength ·2,000 

335 JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS 181,105 171,816 -9,289 

Non-compliance with fiscal year 2013 House direction ·9,289 

411 SECURITY PROGRAMS 1,023,946 1,020,113 -3,833 

Classified adjustment ·3,833 

421 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 690,089 630,089 -60,000 

Overstatement of equipment redistribution costs ·60,000 

431 ADMINISTRATION 487,737 460,955 -26,782 

Eliminate requested growth to headquarters ·26,782 

435 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT 1,212,091 1,216,991 4,900 

Army support to the Capitol 4th 4,900 

441 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS 426,651 457,900 31,249 

Deny transfer of NATO funding to Special Operations 

Command headquarters 31,249 

OVERSTATEMENT OF TRAVEL COSTS .112,000 -112,000 

INCREASE TO SUPPORT REALISTIC FUEL COSTS 91,100 91,100 
68 

ARMY TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES

The Army’s fiscal year 2014 budget request reflects refinements 

in its training strategy to incorporate a 24-month Army Force Generation cycle which leverages more constructive, virtual, and blended training capabilities. The Army has found that the use of virtual 

training has enhanced its ability to meet training goals at reduced 

cost. The Committee believes that commercial off-the-shelf simulation training utilizing service contracts rather than traditional acquisition programs of record could further improve the technological relevance of simulation and training devices for a wide 

range of missions, including regular and irregular warfare against 

conventional and hybrid threats. The Committee encourages the 

Army to evaluate the use of these contracts to reduce overall costs 

for virtual training while enhancing training experiences. 

CEMETERIAL EXPENSES

The Committee notes that the fiscal year 2014 budget request 

once again proposes $25,000,000 to be provided in the Operation 

and Maintenance, Army account to assist with the maintenance 

backlog at Arlington National Cemetery instead of requesting all 

funds within the Cemeterial Expenses, Army account. The Committee does not support the proposal to fund Arlington National 

Cemetery through separate accounts contained in two different appropriations bills. Split funding undermines the federal budgeting 

principles requiring expenditures to be charged against the same 

account each year, once an account has been identified for such 

purpose. The Committee rejects the proposal to fund cemeterial expenses in the Operation and Maintenance, Army account and instead provides all funds for the maintenance backlog at Arlington 

National Cemetery in the Cemeterial Expenses, Army account included in the pending fiscal year 2014 Military Construction and 

Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act. 

HIGH RESOLUTION 3—DIMENSIONAL TERRAIN DATA COLLECTION

The Committee is aware of a validated operational requirement 

to provide unclassified, shareable, high resolution 3-dimensional 

terrain and elevation data which enables commanders to conduct 

the analysis required for mission planning, rehearsal, and execution. This requirement has been fulfilled by the Buckeye ISR system since 2004, which produces data that can provide commanders 

with the situational awareness for requirements such as helicopter 

landing zones, optimal ingress and egress routes, cover and conceal 

sniper, counter-sniper positions, and vertical obstructions. The 

Committee understands this system fulfills a unique requirement 

by producing unclassified data, allowing for data sharing with coalition and host nation forces. Additionally, its sensors can operate 

from various platforms, including fixed wing aircraft, helicopters, 

and unmanned aircraft. The Committee understands that an error 

during the formulation of the budget request resulted in a 

$163,000,000 shortfall to this program for fiscal year 2014 and 

therefore directs the Secretary of the Army to fully fund this important operational ISR requirement. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
69 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $41,614,453,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 39,945,237,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 40,127,402,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +182,165,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $40,127,402,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Navy. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
70 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 32 here 80986A.032

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 : OPERATING FORCES 

AIR OPERATIONS 

10 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS. 4,952,522 4,952,522 

20 FLEET AIR TRAINING. .826.404 1,826,404 

30 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA AND ENGINEERING SERVICES. 38.639 38.639 

40 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT. 90,030 90 030 

50 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT. 362.700 362 700 

60 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE. 915.881 915,881 

70 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 35,838 35,838 

80 AVIATION LOGISTICS .. 379,914 379,914 

SHIP OPERATIONS 

90 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS. 884,836 3, 774 988 -109,848 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT AND TRAINING. 734,852 734 852 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .. 5. 191,511 5, 191 ,511 

120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 1,351,274 ,351 ,274 

COMBAT COMMUNICATIONSISUPPORT 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .. 701,316 701,316 

140 ELECTRONIC WARFARE. 97.710 97,710 

150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE .. 172,330 172.330 

160 WARFARE TACTICS. 454,682 452,601 -2,081 

170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY. 328,406 328,406 

180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES. 946,429 935,297 -11,132 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 142,249 142 249 

200 DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 2,603 2,603 

210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERA nONS. 102.970 102,970 

220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT. 199,128 199,128 
71 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 33 here 80986A.033

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

WEAPONS SUPPORT 

230 CRUISE MISSILE. 

240 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE. 

250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT. 

260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE. 

270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT 

BASE SUPPORT 

280 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. 

290 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION 

MODERNIZATION 

READY RESERVE AND PREPOSITIONING FORCES 

310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE. 

ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS 

320 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS. 

330 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/ INACTIVATIONS. 

MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS 

340 FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM 

350 INDUSTRIAL READINESS. 

360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2. 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

ACCESSION TRAINING 

370 OFFICER ACQUISITION 

380 RECRUIT TRAINING. 

390 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS. 

BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING 

400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING. 

410 FLIGHT TRAINING. 

420 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION .. 

430 TRAINING SUPPORT. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

92,671 92.671 

1,193,1B8 ,193,1BB 

105,985 105,985 

532,627 552,627 +20,000 

304,160 304.160 

,011,528 1,011 .528 

,996,821 2,132.821 +136 000 

4,460.918 4,456.220 -4 698 

... _-------- ---------.--

32,610,122 32,638,363 +28,241 

331,576 331 ,576 

6,638 6,638 

222.752 222.752 

73,310 73,310 

675 2,675 

23 794 23,794 

--.-----.--- ---.-.------

660,745 660,745 

148,516 148 516 

9, 384 9,384 

139 876 139,876 

630,069 630,069 

9,294 9.294 

169,082 169.082 

164,368 164,368 
72 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 34 here 80986A.034

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION 

440 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING. 

450 OFF·DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .. 

460 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING. 

470 JUNIOR ROTC. 

TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 3. 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT 

480 ADMINISTRATION ... 

490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS. 

500 CIVI LlAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT .. 

510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. 

520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT. 

530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS. 

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT 

550 SERVICEWlDE TRANSPORTATION. 

570 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 

580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. 

590 HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT. 

600 COMBAT {WEAPONS SYSTEMS. 

610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS. 

SECURITY PROGRAMS 

620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE. 

SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS 

680 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES. 

OTHER PROGRAMS 

OTHER PROGRAMS. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. 

INCREASE TO SUPPORT REALISTIC FUEL COSTS .. 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

241,733 242 833 +1.100 

139.815 139 815 

94,632 94,632 

51,373 51,373 

~ -- - - - - - ---- ---------.-. 

1 ,798,142 1 ,799,242 +1,100 

886,088 886,088 

13,131 13, 131 

115,742 115 742 

382,150 382,150 

268 403 268,403 

317 293 317,293 

207,128 207, 128 

295 855 295 855 

,140 484 ,140,484 

52 873 52,873 

27,587 27,587 

75,728 75,728 

543.026 543,026 

4,965 4,965 

545 775 543,199 ·2,576 

4,876 228 4,873,652 ·2,576 

155.400 +155,400 

39,945,237 40,127,402 +182,165 
73 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 35 here 80986A.035

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT lEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

0-1 Request Recommended Request 

1B1B MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS 3,884,836 3,774,988 -109,848 

Unjustified growth for utilities due to fewer steaming days -109,848 

1C4C WARFARE TACTICS 454,682 452,601 -2,081 

Unaccounted transfer from SAG 1A2A -2,081 

1C6C COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 946,429 935,297 -11,132 

Unjustified growth for human resources functions -11,132 

1D4D WEAPONS MAINTENANCE 532,627 552,627 20,000 

Program increase ship self defense 20,000 

BSM1 FACiliTIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 1,996,821 2,132,821 136,000 

Restore unjustified efficiency reduction 136,000 

BSS1 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 4,460,918 4,456,220 -4,698 

Overstatement of transfer from SOCOM -4,698 

3C1l RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 241,733 242,833 1,100 

Naval Sea Cadet Corps 1,100 

999 OTHER PROGRAMS 545,775 543,199 -2,576 

Classified adjustment -2,576 

INCREASE TO SUPPORT REALISTIC FUEL COSTS 155,400 155,400 
74 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $6,034,963,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 6,254,650,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 6,298,757,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +44,107,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,298,757,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps. The total amount 

recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
75 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 36 here 80986A.036

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

EXPEDITIONARY FORCES 

10 OPERATIONAL FORCES, 

20 FIELD LOGISTICS, 

30 DEPOT MAl NTENANCE ' 

USMC PREPOSITIONING 

40 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING, 

60 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 

70 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT, 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 , 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

ACCESSION TRAINING 

80 RECRUIT TRAINING, , 

90 OFFICER ACQUISITION, ' 

BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING 

100 SPECIALIZED SKI LLS TRAINING, 

120 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION, 

130 TRAINING SUPPORT, ' 

RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINING EDUCATION 

140 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING, 

150 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION, 

160 JUNIOR ROTC, 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3, 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWlDE ACTIVITIES 

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT 

180 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 

190 ADMINISTRATION, 

200 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, 

SECURITY PROGRAMS 

SECURITY PROGRAMS, 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4, 

INCREASE TO SUPPORT REALISTIC FUEL COSTS, 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS, , 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

837,012 895,998 +58 986 

894,555 874,555 -20 000 

223,337 223,337 

97,878 97,878 

774,619 774,619 

2,166,661 2,166,661 

~ - ¥ - - - - - - - - - ---- ~ ------- ---------_.-

4,994,062 5,033,048 +38,986 

17,693 17 693 

896 896 

100,806 100,806 

46 928 46 928 

356 426 356 426 

179,747 179,747 

52, 255 52,255 

23, 138 23,138 

------------ ------------ ----.-------

777,889 777,889 

43,816 43,816 

305,107 304 828 -279 

87,500 87,500 

46,276 46,276 

482,699 482 420 -279 

5,400 +5,400 

6,254,650 6,298,757 +44,107 
76 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 37 here 80986A.037

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

0·1 Request Recommended Request 

1A1A OPERATIONAL FORCES 837,012 895,998 58,986 

Remove one-time fiscal year 2013 cost of additional 

equipment -6,014 

Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force - Crisis 

Response 30,000 

Marine Embassy Security Program 35,000 

lA2A FIELD LOGISTICS 894,555 874,555 -20,000 

Unexecutable pay raise for civilian personnel ·20,000 

4A4G ADMINISTRATION 305,107 304,828 ·279 

Classified adjustment ·279 

INCREASE TO SUPPORT REALISTIC FUEL COSTS 5,400 5,400 
77 

SPECIAL PURPOSE MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE—CRISIS

RESPONSE

The Marine Corps recently activated a new task force, the Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force—Crisis Response, to 

serve as a regionally based, expeditionary Marine Air Ground Task 

Force that conducts crisis response and limited contingency operations from land-based and maritime platforms in response to 

Commander, United States Africa Command requirements. This 

task force is trained to conduct security, serve as a quick reaction 

force, conduct limited offensive/defensive operations, provide tactical recovery of aircraft and personnel, provide limited humanitarian assistance, and conduct limited non-combatant evacuation 

operations missions. This task force was deployed for the first time 

in April 2013 at the request of the Commander, United States Africa Command. The Committee has added funds for sustainment and 

follow-on deployments of the Special Purpose Marine Air Ground 

Task Force—Crisis Response in fiscal year 2014. 

MARINE CORPS EMBASSY SECURITY PROGRAM

The National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2013 directed the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement a plan 

to increase the number of members of the Marine Corps assigned 

to the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group at Quantico, Virginia, Marine Security Group Regional Commands, and Marine Security Group detachments at United States embassies, consulates, 

and other diplomatic facilities by up to 1,000 Marines. These additional Marines will support enhanced Marine Corps security at 

United States embassies, consulates, and other diplomatic facilities, particularly at locations identified by the Secretary of State as 

in need of additional security because of threats to United States 

personnel and property. The Department of Defense, in concert 

with the Department of State, is developing plans to add 35 new 

Marine Security Guard detachments over the next few years, beginning in fiscal year 2014. The Committee recommendation provides increased funding for the additional training, training aids, 

logistical support, and equipment for the additional Marine Security Guard detachments beginning in fiscal year 2014. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ........................................................ $34,780,406,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 37,270,842,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 37,438,701,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +167,859,000 

*FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $37,438,701,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Air Force. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
78 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 38 here 80986A.038

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

AIR OPERATIONS 

10 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES, 

20 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES, 

30 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING, 

50 OEPOT MAINTENANCE, 

60 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 

70 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT, 

COMBAT RELATED OPERATIONS 

80 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING" 

90 OTHER COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROGRAMS" 

100 TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE AND SPECIAL ACTIVITIES, 

SPACE OPERATIONS 

110 LAUNCH FACILITIES" 

120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS, 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT. 

140 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS, 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

3,295 814 3,291,031 -4,783 

,875,095 1,852,181 -22,914 

,559, 109 1,271,105 -288 004 

5,956 304 6,249,324 +293 020 

,834 424 1 ,934,738 +100 314 

779 811 2,779,811 

913 841 911,329 -2,512 

916,837 915,918 -919 

720,349 720,349 

305,275 291 ,275 -14 000 

433,658 433 658 

,146,016 ,146 016 

231 ,830 231 ,830 

___________ . ----------.- ------------ 21,968,363 22,028,565 +60,202 
79 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 39 here 80986A.039

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION 

MOBILITY OPERATIONS 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS. 2,015 902 015.902 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS. 147 216 147,216 

170 DEPOT MAl NTENANCE .. ,556,232 1,556.232 

180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 167,402 184,142 +16, 740 

190 BASE SUPPORT .. 707,040 707,040 

--------.--- --------.-.- --.---------

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2. 4,593,792 4,610,532 +16.740 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

ACCESSION TRAINING 

200 OFFICER ACQUISITION. 102,334 102, 334 

210 RECRUIT TRAINING. 17,733 17, 733 

220 RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) . 94,600 94 600 

230 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 217 011 238, 712 +21 ,701 

240 BASE SUPPORT (ACADEMIES ONLY) 800,327 800, 327 

BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING. 399,364 399,364 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING. 792,275 792 275 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION. 248,958 248 958 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT. 106,741 106 741 

290 DEPOT MAINTENANCE. 319,331 319,331 

RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION 

300 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING. 122,736 122,736 

310 EXAMINING .. 3,679 3,679 

320 OFF DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION. 137,255 137,255 

330 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING. 176,153 176,153 

340 JUNIOR ROTC. 67 018 67,018 

-----------. ------------

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3. 3,605,515 3,627,216 +21,701 
80 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 40 here 80986A.040

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWlDE ACTIVITIES 

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS. 

360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES. 

370 DEPOT MAINTENANCE. 

380 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 

390 BASE SUPPORT. 

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

400 ADMINISTRATION. 

410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS. 

420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES. 

430 CIVIL AIR PATROL CORPORATION. 

SECURITY PROGRAMS 

SECURITY PROGRAMS. 

SUPPORT TO OTHER NATIONS 

460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

1,103,6B4 1,103.684 

919,923 919,923 

56,601 56,601 

281,061 309,167 +28,106 

1,203,305 .192,345 -10,960 

593,865 593,367 -498 

574,609 574,609 

.028,600 ,028,600 

24,720 28,400 +3,680 

1 ,227,796 1,192,684 -35,112 

89,008 89,008 

7,103,172 7.088,388 -14,784 

UNDERSTATED STRENGTH DUE TO FY 2013 HIRING FREEZE. -200,000 -200,000 

INCREASE TO SUPPORT REALISTIC FUEL COSTS. 284,000 +284,000 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE .. 37,270,842 37,438,701 +167,859 
81 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 41 here 80986A.041

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

0·1 Request Recommended Request 

011A PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 3,295,814 3,291,031 -4,783 

Consolidate depot maintenance funding in SAG 011M ·1,026 

Residual funding after transfer of Air Command E-tool -3,757 

011C COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES 1,875,095 1,852,181 ·22,914 

Consolidate depot mainlenance funding in SAG 011 M ·3,990 

Unjustified growth in management and professional 

services -18,924 

0110 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING 1,559,109 1,271,105 ·288,004 

Consolidate depot maintenance funding in SAG 011 M -288,004 

011M DEPOT MAINTENANCE 5,956,304 6,249,324 293,020 

Consolidate depot maintenance funding from SAG 011A 1,026 

Consolidate depot maintenance funding from SAG 011C 3,990 

Consolidate depot maintenance funding from SAG 011 D 288,004 

011R FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 1,834,424 1,934,738 100,314 

Restore unjustified efficiency reduction 100,314 

012A GLOBAL C31 AND EARLY WARNING 913,841 911,329 ·2,512 

Remove program growth for foreign currency fluctuation -2,512 

012C OTHER COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROGRAMS 916,837 915,918 ·919 

Residua! funding after transfer of offensive cyber 

operatlons -870 

Residual funding afler transfer of AFRICOM engagement -49 

013A LAUNCH FACILITIES 305,275 291,275 ·14,000 

Remove one-time fiscal year 2013 cost of a diminishing 

manufacturing study ·14,000 

015A COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 

SUPPORT 1,146,016 1,146,016 0 

Remove CYBERCOM funds from STRATCOM direct 

mission support ·351,000 

Establish a CYBERCOM direct mission support line 351,000 

015B COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 231,830 231,830 

Remove CYBERCOM funds from STRATCOM direct 

mission support -88,000 

Establish a CYBERCOM direcl mission support line 88,000 

021R FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 167,402 184,142 16,740 

Restore unjustified efficiency reductton 16,740 

031R FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 217,011 238,712 21,701 

Restore unjustified efficiency reduction 21,701 
82 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 42 here 80986A.042

Budget Committee Change from 

0-1 Request Recommended Request 

041R FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 281,061 309,167 28,106 

Restore unjustified efficiency reduction 28,106 

041Z BASE SUPPORT 1,203,305 1,192,345 -10,960 

Unjustified increase for public-private competitions -5,177 

Unjustified increase for utilities -5,783 

042A ADMINISTRATION 593,865 593,367 -498 

Transfer five civillan end strength to the Air Force 

Reserve which had been lost due to Civil Engineer 

transformation -498 

0421 CIVIL AIR PATROL CORPORATION 24,720 28,400 3,680 

Program increase 3,680 

043A SECURITY PROGRAMS 1,227,796 1,192,684 -35,112 

Classified adjustment -35,112 

UNDERSTATED BEGINNING STRENGTH DUE TO 

FISCAL YEAR 2013 HIRING FREEZE -200,000 -200,000 

INCREASE TO SUPPORT REALISTIC FUEL COSTS 284,000 284,000 
83 

CYBER COMMAND FUNDING

Funding for the United States Cyber Command, a subordinate 

unified command under the United States Strategic Command, currently is not discretely visible in the Air Force’s budget justification 

material. With the increased emphasis on cyber activities and related resourcing, the Committee directs that beginning in fiscal 

year 2015, the Air Force’s budget justification material separately 

report and separately justify funds to support Cyber Command in 

sub-activity group 015A, ‘‘Combatant Commands Direct Mission 

Support’’ and in sub-activity group 015B, ‘‘Combatant Command 

Core Operations’’. 

U.S. ACCESS TO THE AZORES

The Committee is concerned by the uncertainty of the Department of Defense’s intentions regarding use of the long-standing 

military infrastructure in the Portuguese Azores, as well as reports 

that China’s military is seeking access to Lajes Air Base, currently 

host to the Air Force’s 65th Air Base Wing. The Committee recognizes that Lajes continues to serve an important role as part of the 

critical en route infrastructure for multiple areas of operation. The 

Committee therefore urges the Secretary of Defense to ensure that 

U.S. interests in the Azores are not unduly harmed when considering changes to overseas military posture. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $31,862,980,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 32,997,693,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 32,301,685,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥696,008,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $32,301,685,000, 

for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide. The total amount 

recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
84 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 044 here 80986A.043

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

10 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF. 472,239 472 239 

20 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND. 5,261,463 282 850 +21 ,387 

------------ --_._---_._- ------------

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 5. 733,702 5,755,089 +21 ,387 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

30 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY. 157,397 157 397 

40 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY. 84,899 88, 502 +3,603 

------------ ------------ ---------.--

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3. 242,296 245,899 +3.603 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

50 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS. 144,443 174 443 +30,000 

80 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY. 612,207 582 207 -30,000 

90 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY. ,378,606 ,299,961 -78,645 

110 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY. 763,091 780,408 +17 317 

120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY. ,326,243 ,326,243 

140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY .. 29.933 29,933 

150 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY. 462,545 461,517 -1,028 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY. 222,979 222,979 

170 DEFENSE POW !MISSING PERSONS OFFICE. 21,594 21,594 

180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY. 788,389 630.589 -157,800 

190 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE .. 546,603 531 ,603 -15 000 

200 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY AGENCY. 35,151 35,151 

210 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY. 438 033 438.033 

220 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY. 2,713 756 2. 713 756 

230 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY. 256,201 254 801 -1,400 

250 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT. 371,615 244 883 -126,732 

260 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. 010,176 001.991 -8,185 

270 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES. 616,572 595 356 -21,216 

OTHER PROGRAMS. 14 283,558 13,915 249 -368,309 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. 27,021 ,695 26 260,697 -760,998 

IMPACT AID. 40,000 +40,000 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE. 32,997,693 32.301,685 -696,008 
85 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 45 here 80986A.044

0-1 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget 

Request 

Committee 

Recommended 

1 PL2 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND 5,261,463 5,282,850 

Flight Operations ~ 160th SOAR contractor logistics 

support excess to need 

Flight Operations - CV-22 contractor logistical support 

ahead of need 

Flight Operations - AFSOC flying hour - transfer from title IX 

Flight Operations USASOC - transfer from title IX 

Ship Operations - restore HSAC operations and 

sustainment reductions 

Ship Operations - restore NSW maritime and undersea 

operations reductions 

Ship Operations - restore range support reductions 

Olher Operations· SOCOM NCR 

Other Operations - deny NATO Special Operations 

Command headquarters transfer from Operation and 

Maintenance, Army 

Other Operations - contingency operations unjustified 

growth 

Other Operations ~ Human physical performance program 

excess growth 

Other Operations ~ Human psychologica! performance 

program ~ transfer to Defense Health Program 

Other Operations ~ SOF unique family programs 

unauthorized program 

Other Operations· Family support program pilot 

Other Operations Regional Security Cooperation Centers 

unauthorized program 

Other Operations - restore NSWG training and equipment 

Other Operations - restore NSW range improvements 

Other Operations - restore ground motor vehicles 

maintenance 

Other Operations - Facilities, Sustainment, Restoration and 

Modernization excess to need 

Other Operations - military construction collateral 

equipment non-recurring costs 

Communications - C41AS FMV and expansion for force 

structure growth unjustified growth 

Communications - international SOF information sharing 

system early to need 

Communications - transfer from title IX 

Maintenance - Family of Special Operations vehiclestransfer from title IX 

Maintenance - Restore Naval Special Warfare Maritime 

Craft logistical support and maintenance 

Maintenance - Logistics support base - transfer from tiUe lX 

Management and Headquarters Operations - civilian 

growth excess to need 

Management and Headquarters Operations - contractor 

growth excess to need 

Management and Headquarters Operations - Advanced 

Education Program unjustified program 

Management and Headquarters Operations - transfer to 

National Defense University 

Intelligence ~ excess civilian growth 

·2,250 

·3,679 

70,121 

18,015 

5,000 

7,365 

3,100 

·10,000 

·31,267 

·35,519 

·25,305 

-21,300 

·8,786 

5,000 

·16,000 

11,611 

3,318 

34,128 

-25,000 

·50,000 

·4,488 

-7,017 

44,725 

3,673 

7,688 

10,557 

·6,993 

·3,606 

·3,863 

-3,603 

·6,997 

Change from 

Request 

21,387 
86 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 46 here 80986A.045

Budget Committee Change from 

0-1 Request Recommended Request 

Intelligence M JTWS transfer from title IX 801 

InteHigence ~ Special Access Program M transfer from title IX 35,448 

Operational Support - restore Special Operations Joint 

Forces Command 6,779 

Operational Support - Restore headquarters interagency 

task force 5,882 

Specialized skill training - transfer from tiUe IX 7,021 

Acquisition Program Management Restore base 

reduction and transfer from title IX 6,828 

PEV5 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY 84,899 88,502 3,603 

Transfer from SOCOM management and headquarters 

operations 3,603 

4GT3 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS 144,443 174,443 30,000 

Youth ChalleNGe 5,000 

STAR BASE youth program 25,000 

4GT6 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY 612,207 582,207 -30,000 

Five percent savings due to decrease in procurement 

workload -30,000 

4GTB DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 462,545 461,517 -1,028 

Cost of OISA computing service rates -11,028 

Procurement Technical Assistance Program 10,000 

4GT8 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY 763,091 780,408 17,317 

Unjustified increase to operations -2,683 

Program increase Suicide Prevention Office 20,000 

4GTO DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY 1,378,606 1,299,961 -78,645 

Five percent savings due to decrease In procurement 

workload -68,000 

Unjustified increase for voluntary separation incentive pay -700 

Overstatement of growth in civilian FTEs -9,625 

Overstatement of GSA rents -320 

4GTD DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 788,389 630,589 -157,800 

Global Security Contingency Fund -75,000 

Revised 1206 authority -82,800 

4GTE DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE 546,603 531,603 -15,000 

Unjustified growth for background investigations related to 

the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 

2004 -15,000 

4GTM OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT 371,615 244,883 -126,732 

Rephasing of Guam civitian water and waste water 

infrastructure projects -273,300 

Rephasing of Guam civilian water and waste water 

infrastructure projects 133,700 

Guam Regional Health Laboratory 12,868 
87 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 47 here 80986A.046

Budget Committee Change from 

0-1 Request Recommended Request 

4GTN OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 2,010,176 2,001,991 -8,185 

Efficiencies to the office of the Assistant Secretary of 

Defense for Public Affairs -185 

Funds to support BRAC 2015 -8,000 

4GTQ WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES 616,572 595,356 -21,216 

Unjustified growth for contracted management and 

professional support services -13,158 

Price growth that was mislabeled as program growth -8,058 

011A MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 256,201 254,801 -1,400 

THAAD excess to requirement -1,400 

9999 OTHER PROGRAMS 14,283,558 13,915,249 ·368,309 

Classified adjustment -368,309 

IMPACT AID 40,000 40,000 
88 

SUICIDE PREVENTION TRAINING AND OUTREACH

Suicide remains an issue of concern to the Committee and the 

Services, especially in the Guard and reserve components. While 

there was a slight drop in the number of reported suicides from 

2010 to 2011, the number of suicides increased significantly from 

2011 to 2012. Whereas servicemembers serving on active duty return from deployments to military bases which provide more structured support networks, returning Guardsmen and reservists are 

frequently geographically isolated from their units and may not 

have the regular interactions with their peers and chain of command that their active duty counterparts experience. 

The Committee is aware that suicide remains a problem among 

servicemembers who have never deployed as well as those who 

have deployed once or multiple times. The Committee is aware of 

programs for the reserve components, such as the National Guard 

Psychological Health Program, to improve access to mental health 

providers. The National Guard Psychological Health Program provides a Director of Psychological Health for the Army National 

Guard in each of the 54 states and territories and will fund an additional 24 directors assigned to high-risk states. It also funds a Director of Psychological Health for the Air National Guard in all 89 

wings. The directors advise leadership on psychological wellness 

issues, provide clinical assessments, ensure targeted mental health 

referrals, and mitigate problems with access to behavioral health 

care providers in local communities for eligible Guardsmen and 

their families. The Committee understands that the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2013 authorized a pilot program to improve access to behavioral health care for National 

Guard and reserve members and their families through a collaboration of federal, state, and community partners. The Committee is 

aware that the National Guard Bureau is working to utilize existing federal and local partners to provide timely access to qualified 

and trained mental health counselors and supports efforts to leverage existing infrastructure to facilitate access to mental health care 

for military servicemembers and their families. 

The Committee recommendation provides increased funding for 

the Army National Guard Psychological Health Program to increase the number of providers available to Guardsmen and their 

families. The Committee recommendation also provides increased 

funding for suicide prevention in the Operation and Maintenance, 

Defense-Wide account. In addition, the Committee recognizes the 

important role that programs such as Yellow Ribbon play in helping Guardsmen and reservists transition to civilian life upon returning from deployment, and fully funds the budget request for 

Yellow Ribbon. 

The Committee acknowledges the steps the Services have taken 

to implement suicide prevention training and outreach efforts and 

lower the rate of suicide among servicemembers, but it believes 

that more must be done to identify at-risk servicemembers and to 

improve prevention and outreach efforts. The Committee urges the 

Service Secretaries to continue to make suicide prevention a key 

priority and to regularly update the Committee on actions being 

taken. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
89 

STARBASE

The Department of Defense STARBASE program is designed to 

raise the interest and improve the knowledge and skills of students 

in kindergarten through twelfth grade in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The program currently operates 

on Air Force, Air National Guard, Air Force Reserve, Navy, Navy 

Reserve, and Marine Corps military installations and facilities at 

65 locations. The military volunteers who mentor students apply 

abstract principles to real world situations by leading tours and 

giving lectures on the use of STEM in different settings and careers, and they engage students through the inquiry-based curriculum with its ‘‘hands-on, mind-on’’ experiential activities in a 

technologically rich military environment. The program has a proven record of improving student understanding, interest, and ability 

in math and science and stimulating interest in STEM careers 

while establishing lasting relationships between community educators and military installations. 

The STARBASE program seeks to serve students that are historically underrepresented in STEM, including students who live in 

inner cities or rural locations, are socio-economically disadvantaged, low in academic performance, or disabled. The fiscal year 

2014 budget request seeks to reorganize STEM programs throughout the federal government, and all funding for STARBASE was removed from the Department of Defense’s fiscal year 2014 budget 

request. The Committee finds that terminating the STARBASE 

program is not advisable. STARBASE provides a unique low-cost 

leveraging of community and military resources that another federal agency will not be able to duplicate. The intangible benefits of 

solid cooperative community and military relationships stimulate 

the long-term interest of youth in STEM careers. The Committee 

recommendation therefore restores funding so the Department’s 

STARBASE program will continue in fiscal year 2014. 

DATA RESEARCH TOOLS IN SECURITY CLEARANCE INVESTIGATIONS

The Committee is concerned about the timeliness of completing 

security clearance investigations. The Committee understands the 

Department of Defense and the Office of the Director of National 

Intelligence have expressed similar concerns. Currently, automated 

data research tools are available online through the Defense Personnel Security Research Center (PERSEREC). These tools can be 

used to assist security clearance adjudicators, personnel security 

investigators, and security managers in implementing personnel security policy. However, military Services and Department of Defense agencies may not be aware that the PERSEREC tools are 

available. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the Secretary of Defense, through the Office of Defense Human Resources 

Activity and in coordination with the Office of Personnel Management, reach out to the military Services and Defense agencies to 

ensure that they are aware of the PERSEREC online tools and how 

these tools could be used to reduce the time and cost of investigation and adjudication of security clearances. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
90 

MEALS READY-TO-EAT WAR RESERVE

The Committee is concerned with the Defense Logistics Agency’s 

(DLA) potential reduction to the Meal, Ready-to-Eat (MRE) war reserve. The Committee commends the DLA for initiating action to 

study the MRE war reserve but is concerned that a reduction in 

MRE war reserve could harm the industrial base and threaten the 

Department’s ‘‘Go to War’’ capabilities. The Committee has expressed strong interest in the MRE war reserve program dating 

back to 2003 when DLA increased its requirement for the war reserve to six million cases. The Committee directs the Director of 

the DLA, in conjunction with the military Services and industry, to 

develop a comprehensive plan that addresses the aggregate MRE 

requirements for each of the military Services that considers war 

time surge requirements and timely rotation of the MRE war reserve. 

OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR MILITARY FAMILIES WITH

SPECIAL NEEDS

The Committee recognizes the stressful conditions and financial 

burdens experienced by servicemembers with developmentally disabled children. These conditions are often magnified by long separations caused by deployments. The Committee encourages the Director of the Office of Community Support for Military Families 

with Special Needs to collaborate with non-profit organizations 

that have expertise in developmental disabilities to establish educational and assistive programs at military bases. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND READINESS

The Committee recommendation provides an increase of 

$269,399,000 above the budget request to restore readiness reductions to the Special Operations Command fiscal year 2014 operation and maintenance base funding. The Committee recommendation restores funding for flying hours, training, equipment replacement, depot maintenance, and enduring operational expenses. The 

Consolidated and Full Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 

approved a shift of $885,000,000 from overseas contingency operations (OCO) funding to base funding to begin to transition these 

enduring readiness requirements into the base budget from the 

OCO accounts. The Committee is disappointed that the fiscal year 

2014 budget request proposes to shift $194,641,000 back to the 

OCO accounts and proposes an additional $74,698,000 in reductions to these readiness activities. Therefore, the Committee recommendation restores these reductions to ensure Special Operations Forces are fully able to meet their long term readiness requirements. 

USE OF MAJOR FORCE PROGRAM—11 FUNDS

In an era of increasing fiscal constraint, the Committee believes 

it is incumbent on the Department of Defense and the Special Operations Command (SOCOM) to ensure that Major Force Program– 

11 (MFP–11) funds be reserved for its original purpose, to provide 

the incremental funding necessary for Special Operations Forces 

(SOF) unique capabilities and items, rather than to supplement or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
91 

supplant activities that are or should be provided by the military 

Services. The Committee is concerned that several funding requests in the fiscal year 2014 budget would establish new precedents for the use of MFP–11 funds. In some cases, funds were requested to establish new programs and activities that duplicated 

Service-provided or Department of Defense programs. In other 

cases, SOCOM’s request would assume responsibility for activities 

that previously, and more appropriately, were funded by the Services. The Committee is concerned that MFP–11 funds are now perceived as a mechanism to insulate SOCOM from Service budget reductions or to create separate SOF programs that are the responsibility of the Services. It has come to the Committee’s attention that 

at least one waiver of the use of MFP–11 operation and maintenance funds was granted in fiscal year 2013 in order to establish 

a new SOF program, a process that the Committee was unaware 

of prior to this year. Therefore, the Committee directs the Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller), working with the Comptroller, 

Special Operations for Financial Management (SOFM), to clearly 

identify and justify in the fiscal year 2015 budget request all MFP– 

11 operation and maintenance funding for programs and activities 

for which: (1) the military Services or other Department of Defense 

elements previously had responsibility for funding, including those 

related to special operations; or (2) funds would be transferred between the MFP–11 budget and other Major Force Program budgets, 

and the justification for such transfers. Further, the Committee directs the Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller), working with 

the Comptroller, SOFM, to submit a report not later than 90 days 

after the enactment of this Act to the congressional defense committees outlining the guidelines for the use of MFP–11 operation 

and maintenance funds, a description of the waiver process to use 

MFP–11 funds for non-MFP–11 activities, and a list of all waivers 

granted in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 and the justification for such 

waivers. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND HUMAN PSYCHOLOGICAL

PERFORMANCE AND FAMILY PROGRAMS

The Committee understands the tremendous toll exacted on all 

servicemembers and their families, including those in the special 

operations community, after more than a decade of war. The Committee has always made the care of servicemembers and their families its highest priority, including special operators. The Committee 

appreciates the focus of the Commander, Special Operations Command on the psychological health and well-being of special operations forces and their families. The Committee also recognizes the 

success of the Services’ embedded behavioral health programs and 

fully supports their expansion to the special operations community. 

However, the Committee believes that the mental health needs of 

all servicemembers, including special operations servicemembers, 

are most appropriately addressed within the Defense Health Program to ensure the highest quality continuity of care for all servicemembers. Therefore, the Committee recommendation transfers 

$21,300,000 requested within the Special Operations Command operation and maintenance budget to the Defense Health Program to 

address the needs of the special operations community consistent 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
92 

with Service programs. The Committee directs the Service Surgeons General to work with the Commander, Special Operations 

Command to implement an embedded behavioral health program 

for special operations units during fiscal year 2014. The budget request also includes $8,786,000 to establish special 

operations forces (SOF) unique family resiliency programs. The 

Committee does not recommend funding for this unauthorized program. The Committee recognizes that the deployment cycles of special operations forces may in some limited circumstances make it 

more difficult for SOF families to fully participate in family support 

programs. However, the need for the establishment of separate 

family support programs exclusively for SOF families has not been 

demonstrated nor is it currently authorized. The Committee believes it is important for the morale of all servicemembers that 

there not be inequities among families exclusively based on a 

servicemember’s assignment. The Committee understands that the 

pending fiscal year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act authorizes a limited pilot program to assess the feasibility and benefits of SOF family support activities. Therefore, the Committee recommends $5,000,000 for the pilot program. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND HUMAN PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE

PROGRAM

The Committee recommendation does not include an increase of 

$25,305,000 for the Human Physical Performance Program. This 

request would fund 331 contractors to provide physical training 

and sports conditioning, sports psychology, and sports nutrition 

services for special operations forces (SOF), but would not cover the 

non-salary operational costs or anticipated new facilities associated 

with this initiative. While military construction funding was requested for new facilities associated with this initiative, the necessary authorization and funding was denied in the pending fiscal 

year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act, as well as in the 

pending fiscal year 2014 Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act. 

The Committee has long supported physical training programs to 

ensure that special operators are in top condition to achieve their 

mission and to prevent physical injuries. In the past, there has 

often been a reliance on training programs designed for collegiate 

or professional athletes, programs which may or may not meet the 

needs of the special operator. In addition, the physical training requirements vary between special operators based on their mission 

set. In an attempt to address this challenge, over the last several 

years at the request of the Special Operations Command (SOCOM), 

the Committee has funded the Tactical Athlete Program within the 

Department of Navy to provide the necessary baseline research for 

each individual type of SOF operator in order to design appropriate 

physical training programs to meet those specialized needs. This 

approach was previously used by the Department of the Army to 

successfully develop a training program for the 101st Airborne Division. The Committee recommendation includes continued funding 

under the Department of the Navy to complete these assessments. 

The Committee believes that the investment and corresponding 

results from this research will enable SOCOM to design physical 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
93 

training programs uniquely tailored to the needs of special operators in the most productive and cost effective manner possible. The 

Committee is concerned that the new program proposed by 

SOCOM did not utilize the research investment that has been 

made in order to develop a program that meets the unique needs 

of special operators in the most cost effective manner possible. 

Therefore, the Committee does not provide the requested increase 

to expand this new program. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ADVANCED EDUCATION PROGRAM

The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes $8,466,000 for a 

new Advanced Education Program for the Special Operations Command. Of this amount, $3,603,000 was requested to fund a National Defense University (NDU) satellite Masters Degree program 

at the John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School established with funding from the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Special Operations/Low-Intensity Conflict. The remaining 

$4,863,000 was requested to establish new programs or expand existing programs. 

The Committee supports professional military education opportunities for all servicemembers, including those in the special operations forces (SOF) community. While the Committee appreciates 

the Commander, Special Operations Command’s desire to augment 

the advanced education opportunities for SOF students, it is unclear to the Committee that the proposed programs represent truly 

SOF-unique requirements and instead may be duplicative of education opportunities provided by the Services. 

The Committee understands that SOCOM is in the process of 

working with the Service Secretaries to establish a process to formalize SOF-unique education requirements. The Committee directs 

the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the Commander, Special Operations Command, to provide a report to the 

congressional defense committees not later than 90 days after the 

enactment of this Act, which outlines all SOF-unique educational 

requirements, includes recommendations to meet such requirements, and describes how the proposed SOCOM educational initiatives compare to Service-offered educational opportunities. 

Therefore, the Committee transfers $3,603,000 from SOCOM’s 

operation and maintenance budget to NDU’s budget to maintain 

appropriate program and budget oversight of all NDU programs. 

Additionally, the Committee recommendation includes a reduction 

of $3,863,000 for new and expanded programs based on concerns 

regarding duplication and requirements. The remaining $1,000,000 

provided is for existing programs and SOCOM is directed to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later 

than 60 days after the enactment of this Act on the use of these 

funds. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION

The Committee recommendation does not include $10,000,000 to 

establish a Special Operations Command National Capital Region 

(SOCOM–NCR) entity. This funding request was also denied in the 

pending fiscal year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act. The 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
94 

budget justification materials indicate that SOCOM plans to implement this proposal in phases. 

The Committee has requested, but has not received, a detailed 

plan which lays out the full operating capability and end-state envisioned by this proposal and instead has only received information 

on the phase-zero and phase-one plans. The Committee remains 

unclear about the function, purpose, and costs associated with the 

operations, infrastructure, and facilities for this entity both in the 

interim phase and the final end-state. Further, the Committee has 

received conflicting information over the course of the last year as 

to the purpose of this entity. At times it has been described as an 

efficiency mechanism to relocate over 300 SOCOM personnel to one 

consolidated location within the NCR. The Committee is confused 

by this explanation given that the vast majority of SOCOM personnel assigned to the NCR function as liaison officers and Special 

Operations Support Teams to other federal agencies and as such 

should remain resident at such agencies. At other times, some 

functions of the new SOCOM–NCR appear to duplicate functions 

already resident at SOCOM headquarters. The Committee is concerned that in a time of declining budget resources, it is incumbent 

upon SOCOM and the Department to fully delineate the functions, 

responsibilities, facilities requirements, infrastructure, and operating costs associated with this proposal before moving forward in 

order to carefully assess whether a statutory waiver of the prohibition on relocations into and within the more expensive National 

Capital Region area is warranted. 

Should the Secretary of Defense waive the prohibition in Section 

8018 of this Act, the Committee believes such a decision should be 

based on the full operating capability and final end-state agreed to 

by the Department of Defense. 

Therefore, the Commander, Special Operations Command is directed not to obligate or expend funds for the proposed SOCOM– 

NCR until 30 days after the congressional defense committees receive a copy of the Secretary of Defense’s waiver of Section 8018 

of this Act and a report which fully describes the anticipated full 

operating capability and end-state for this entity as follows: (1) a 

description of the purpose and specific activities to be performed by 

the SOCOM–NCR; (2) an explanation of the impact of this proposal 

on existing activities at SOCOM headquarters and components, including the cost differential associated with relocating these functions from their existing locations to the NCR; and (3) a detailed, 

by fiscal year, breakout of all staffing and costs, including a longterm facilities plan, associated with its establishment over the future years defense plan (fiscal years 2014–2018) and at the full operating capability and planned final end-state. The Committee will 

consider a prior approval reprogramming in fiscal year 2014 from 

within available Special Operations Command operation and maintenance funds for the SOCOM–NCR if the Secretary of Defense 

grants the waiver of Section 8018 and the congressional defense 

committees have been provided the required comprehensive report. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BUDGET JUSTIFICATION

The Committee is concerned regarding the quality of the operation and maintenance budget justification submitted by the SpeVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
95 

cial Operations Command (SOCOM). As a result, the Committee is 

unable to conduct meaningful oversight of SOCOM’s budget requirements as the current justification does not include the necessary level of detail. Due to the failure of the budget justification 

to provide such information, the Committee is unable to analyze 

changes and trends over time in SOCOM’s budget requirements, 

conduct comparative analysis with similar Department of Defense 

budget requirements, or have any understanding or visibility into 

changing requirements in the year of execution. The budget structure required by Department of Defense Financial Management 

Regulation (FMR) would provide the information needed. However, 

in fiscal year 2006, the Department of Defense took action to exempt SOCOM from these requirements and thereby limited congressional visibility and oversight. Since that time, the SOCOM 

base operation and maintenance budget has grown by 143 percent. 

Additionally, due to this exemption, SOCOM does not provide 

meaningful information that details the changing requirements 

among activities for overseas contingency operations requests. 

In a time of declining budget resources, the Committee must 

have the same level of visibility into SOCOM’s funding as is provided by the Services in order to facilitate appropriate oversight. 

Therefore, the Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller) and the 

Comptroller, Special Operations for Financial Management (SOFM) 

are directed to submit the fiscal year 2015 SOCOM base and OCO 

operation and maintenance budget justification in accordance with 

Volume 2A, Chapter 3 of the FMR as such requirements apply to 

the Services. As required by the FMR, the budget justification shall 

be delineated and detailed by budget activity group, activity group, 

and sub-activity group with detailed changes within each sub-activity reflected on OP–5 and OP–32 exhibits. The Committee directs 

the Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller) and the Comptroller, 

SOFM to consult with the Committee during development of the 

fiscal year 2015 budget on actions being taken to make the necessary changes not later than October 1, 2013. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $3,182,923,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 3,095,036,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 3,199,151,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +104,115,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,199,151,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve. The total amount 

recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
96 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 48 here 80986A.047

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

LAND FORCES 

10 MANEUVER UNITS. 

20 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES. 

30 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES. 

40 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS. 

50 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 

60 AVIATION ASSETS. 

LAND FORCES READINESS 

70 FORCES READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 

80 LAND FORCES SYSTEM READ I NESS. 

90 DEPOT MAINTENANCE. 

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS HEADQUARTERS. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION. 

140 ADMINISTRATION. 

150 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS, 

160 PERSONNEL/FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION 

170 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

1,621 1,621 

24,429 24,429 

657,099 657,099 

122,485 122,485 

584.058 582,958 -1,100 

79.380 79,380 

471 ,616 471,616 

74 243 74,243 

70,894 146,694 +75,800 

569 801 569,801 

294, 145 323,560 +29,415 

51,853 51,853 

3,001,624 3,105,739 +104,115 

10,735 10,735 

24, 197 24,197 

10, 304 10,304 

10,319 10 319 

37,857 37 857 

------------

93,412 93,412 

3.095,036 3,199,151 +104.115 
97 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 49 here 80986A.048

0-1 

115 

123 

132 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 584,058 582,958 

Budget justification does not match summary of price -1,100 

and program changes for civilian personnel 

compensation 

DEPOT MAINTENANCE 70,894 146,694 

Army Reserve identified shortfall ~ restore unjustified 75,800 

efficiency reduction 

FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 294,145 323,560 

Restore unjustified efficiency reduction 29,415 

Change from 

Request 

-1,100 

75,800 

29,415 
98 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $1,256,347,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 1,197,752,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 1,200,283,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +2,531,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,200,283,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve. The total amount 

recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
99 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 50 here 80986A.049

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

RESERVE AIR OPERATIONS 

10 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS, 

20 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE 

40 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE, 

50 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT, 

60 AVIATION LOGISTICS, 

RESERVE SHIP OPERATIONS 

70 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS, 

80 SHIP OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AND TRAINING, 

90 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE, 

RESERVE COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 

100 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS, 

110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES, 

RESERVE WEAPONS SUPPORT 

120 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE, 

130 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 

BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 

140 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 

150 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT, 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1, 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

160 ADMINISTRATION 

170 MILITARY MANPOWER & PERSONNEL, 

180 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS" 

190 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4, 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE, 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

586,620 586,620 

7,008 7,008 

100,657 100,657 

305 305 

927 927 

75,933 75 933 

601 601 

44, 364 44,364 

15,477 15 477 

115,608 115,608 

1,967 ,967 

43,726 39,356 -4,370 

69 011 75 912 +6 901 

109,604 109 604 

1,174,808 1,177,339 +2,531 

905 2,905 

14 425 14,425 

2,485 2,485 

3,129 3,129 

22,944 22,944 

============ ============ ====.===,,==== 

1,197,752 1,200,283 +2,531 
100 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 51 here 80986A.050

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

0-1 Request Recommended 

BSIT ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 43,726 39,356 

NGEN excess to requirement -4,370 

BSMR FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 69,011 75,912 

Restore unjustified efficiency reduction 6,901 

Change from 

Request 

-4,370 

6,901 
101 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $277,377,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 263,317,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 266,561,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +3,244,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $266,561,000 for 

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
102 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 52 here 80986A.051

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

EXPEDITIONARY FORCES 

10 OPERATING FORCES. 96,244 96 244 

20 DEPOT MAINTENANCE. 17,581 17 581 

40 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 32,438 35,682 +3,244 

50 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT. 95,259 95.259 

------------ -----_.---.-

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 241,522 244,766 +3,244 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

70 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION. 894 894 

80 ADMINISTRATION 11,743 11,743 

90 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING. 9,158 9,158 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4, 21.795 21,795 

TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE 263,317 266,561 +3,244 
103 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 53 here 80986A.052

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

BSM1 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 

Restore unjustified efficiency reduction 

32,438 35,682 

3,244 

3,244 
104 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $3,261,324,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 3,164,607,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 3,149,046,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥15,561,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,149,046,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
105 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 54 here 80986A.053

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

AIR OPERATIONS 

10 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES. 1 ,857,951 .837,820 -20,131 

20 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS. 224,462 220,062 -4,400 

30 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .. 521 ,182 521,182 

40 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 89 704 98,674 +8 970 

50 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT. 360,836 360,836 

__ ._o _____ ._ ----.---.--- TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 3,054,135 3,038,574 -15,561 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

60 ADMINISTRATION. 64,362 64,362 

70 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING. 15 056 15,056 

80 MI LITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. 23 617 23 617 

90 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT .. 6,618 618 

100 AUDIOVISUAL. 819 819 

. -.--.----.- .-.------.- . ----------.-

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. 110,472 110,472 

':=========== ============ ============ 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE. 3,164,607 3,149,046 -15,561 
106 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 55 here 80986A.054

0-1 

011A 

011G 

011R 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL AOJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 1,857,951 1,837,820 

Unjustified increase for authorized divestiture of the C~5A -20,131 

Fleet 

MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 224,462 220,062 

Unjustified growth in civilian personnel compensation -4,400 

FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 89,704 98,674 

Restore unjustified efficiency reduction 8,970 

Change from 

Request 

-20,131 

-4,400 

8,970 
107 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $7,154,161,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 7,054,196,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 7,102,113,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +47,917,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $7,102,113,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
108 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 56 here 80986A.055

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

LAND FORCES 

10 MANEUVER UNITS, 

20 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES, 

30 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE, , 

40 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS, 

50 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT, 

60 AVIATION ASSETS, 

LAND FORCES READINESS 

70 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT, 

80 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS, 

90 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE, 

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS, 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1, 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

140 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION, 

150 ADMINISTRATION" 

160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS, 

170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT, 

180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING, , ' 

140 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4, 

UNJUSTIFIED GROWTH FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL COMPENSATION 

TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

800,880 800,880 

178,650 178 650 

771,503 771 ,503 

98,699 98,699 

38,779 38,779 

922,503 922,503 

761,056 761,056 

62,971 62,971 

233,105 233,105 

,019,059 1,024,059 +5,000 

712,139 783,353 +71,214 

,013,715 1,000,418 -13 297 

w __________ w 

-----------. 

6,613,059 6,675,976 +62,917 

10,812 10,812 

78,284 78 284 

46,995 46 995 

6, 390 6,390 

297, 105 297,105 

,551 1,551 

------ ----- ------------ ------------ 441 ,137 441,137 

-15,000 -15 000 

7,054,196 7,102,113 +47,917 
109 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 57 here 80986A.056

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

0·1 

131 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 

State Directors of Psychologica! Health program increase 

132 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 

Restore unjustified efficiency reduction 

133 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 

Army National Guard identified severance pay excess to 

requirement 

UNJUSTIFIED GROWTH FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL 

COMPENSATION 

Budget 

Request 

1,019,059 

712,139 

1,013,715 

Committee 

Recommended 

1,024,059 

5,000 

783,353 

71,214 

1,000,418 

-13,297 

·15,000 

Change from 

Request 

5,000 

71,214 

·13,297 

·15,000 
110 

NATIONAL GUARD CIVIL SUPPORT TEAMS

The Army and Air National Guard Weapons of Mass Destruction/ 

Civil Support Teams support civil authorities at a domestic Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and High Yield Explosive 

Enterprise incident site by identifying hazardous agents or substances, assessing current and projected consequences, advising on 

response measures, and assisting with appropriate requests for 

state support. There are a total of 57 National Guard teams: one 

in each state, plus one each in the District of Columbia, Guam, 

Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and two each in the 

states of California, New York, and Florida, due to the geographic 

separation and concentrations of populations in these three states. 

The Committee is pleased that the fiscal year 2014 budget request includes funding for the 57 teams, including the two teams 

in New York and Florida that were proposed for elimination in the 

fiscal year 2013 budget request. The Committee fully funds the 

budget request for Civil Support Teams and expects the Secretary 

of Defense to fully fund the two teams in Florida and New York 

in the fiscal year 2015 budget request. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $6,494,326,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 6,566,004,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 6,675,999,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +109,995,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,675,999,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
111 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 58 here 80986A.057

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

AIR OPERATIONS 

10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS. 

20 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS,. 

30 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .. 

40 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 

50 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

60 ADMINISTRATION. 

70 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. 

TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

3,371 ,871 3,371,871 

720,305 710,605 -9,700 

1,514,870 1,604,870 +90,000 

296,953 326,648 +29,695 

597,303 597,303 

- -~ -~ ~ ---~ -- ------------ 6,501,302 6,611,297 +109,995 

32,117 32,117 

32,585 32.585 

.-----------

64.702 64 702 

6,566,004 6,675,999 +109,995 
112 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 59 here 80986A.058

0-1 

011G 

011M 

011R 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars1 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 720,305 710,605 

Budget justification does not match summary of price -9,700 

and program changes for civilian compensation 

DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,514,870 1,604,870 

Unjustified cost increase for Contractor Logistics Support -30,000 

Air Nationa! Guard ldentifjed shortfall - restore unjustified 120,000 

efficiency reduction 

FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 296,953 326,648 

Restore unjustified efficiency reduction 29,695 

Change from 

Request 

-9,700 

90,000 

29,695 
113 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER 

ACCOUNT 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... – – – 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... $5,000,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. – – – 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥5,000,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends no funding for the Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Account. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED 

FORCES 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $13,516,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 13,606,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 13,606,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. – – – 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $13,606,000 for 

the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $335,921,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 298,815,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 298,815,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. – – – 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $298,815,000 for 

Environmental Restoration, Army. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $310,594,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 316,103,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 316,103,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. – – – 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $316,103,000 for 

Environmental Restoration, Navy. 

VIEQUES ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION

The Navy is conducting environmental restoration at sites on 

Vieques Island associated with former Navy activities. Investigations for cleanup of the western part of the island have been 

planned and carried out with the collaboration and approval of the 

Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, 

which currently operates the 400 acre site as part of the Vieques 

National Wildlife Refuge. In response to concerns expressed by the 

public, the Navy is conducting additional sampling and will develop 

additional alternatives for the final remedy, which will be included 

in an addendum to the Feasibility Study for remediation of the 

site. The Committee understands that the final remedy for the site 

will be selected by consensus amongst the Navy, the Puerto Rico 

Environmental Quality Board, the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, and that it 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
114 

will support public access and use. The Committee is encouraged 

by these efforts and directs the Secretary of the Navy to inform the 

congressional defense committees on the progress of the site cleanup. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $529,263,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 439,820,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 439,820,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. – – – 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $439,820,000 for 

Environmental Restoration, Air Force. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE-WIDE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $11,133,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 10,757,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 10,757,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. – – – 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $10,757,000 for 

Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, FORMERLY USED 

DEFENSE SITES 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $287,543,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 237,443,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 262,443,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +25,000,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $262,443,000 for 

Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS

The Committee believes that improved oversight and management of the Department of Defense Environmental Restoration program will yield continued benefits. Included as part of the Defense 

Environmental Program’s Annual Report to Congress, the Secretary of Defense is requested to provide the following information 

for all installations and properties receiving funding in the current 

fiscal year: the total site-level cost-to-complete (CTC) for all restoration actions included in the report for the fiscal year prior to 

the year covered by the report; the total amount of environmental 

restoration funds obligated at the site-level during the fiscal year 

covered by the report; a breakdown of adjustments made to the 

CTC, including but not limited to price changes such as inflation 

factors, accounting adjustments for long-term cleanups, addition of 

new sites, projected cost growth, and other identified factors; the 

site-level CTC for all restoration actions included in the report for 

the fiscal year covered by the report; and the net reduction in CTC 

between the two fiscal years. If the CTC is not reduced by the corresponding amount of monetary investment, a justification shall be 

provided. In addition, at those installations in which the cost-tocomplete has increased by ten percent or more from the previous 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
115 

fiscal year, the report shall provide a detailed justification and explanation for the cost increase. This should be considered an ongoing annual requirement. 

OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $108,759,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 109,500,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 109,500,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. – – – 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $109,500,000 for 

Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid. 

COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $519,111,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 528,455,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 528,455,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. – – – 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $528,455,000 for 

the Cooperative Threat Reduction Account. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE 

DEVELOPMENT FUND 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $50,198,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 256,031,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 51,031,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥205,000,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $51,031,000 for 

the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(117) 

TITLE III 

PROCUREMENT 

ESTIMATES AND APPROPRIATIONS SUMMARY 

The fiscal year 2014 Department of Defense procurement budget 

request totals $99,106,242,000. The Committee recommendation 

provides $98,356,158,000 for the procurement accounts. The table 

below summarizes the Committee recommendations: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
118 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 60 here 80986A.059

AIRCRAFT, 

MISSILES, 

SUMMARY 

ARMY 

WEAPONS, TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES, 

AMMUNITION, 

OTHER, 

TOTAL, ARMY, 

AIRCRAFT, 

WEAPONS, ' 

AMMUNITION, 

SHIPS, 

OTHER, 

MARINE CORPS, 

TOTAL, NAVY, 

AIRCRAFT, 

MISSILES. 

AMMUNITION 

OTHER 

TOTAL, AIR FORCE, 

DEFENSE-WIDE, 

NAVY 

AIR FORCE 

DEFENSE -WI DE 

DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES. , 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

5,024,387 

1 ,334,083 

1,597,267 

1,540,437 

6,465,218 

5,236,653 

1,628,083 

1,545,560 

1,465,937 

6,467,751 

15,961,392 16,343,984 

17,927,651 

3,122,193 

589,267 

14,077,804 

6,310,257 

1,343,511 

17,092 784 

3,017 646 

544,116 

15,000,704 

6,824,824 

1,271,311 

43,370,683 43,751,385 

11,398,901 

5,343,286 

759,442 

16,760,581 

10,860,606 

5,267,119 

743,442 

16,791,497 

34,262,210 33,662,664 

4,534,083 

25,135 

4,522,990 

75,135 

98 , 153 , 503 98, 356 , 158 

+212,266 

+294,000 

-51,707 

-74,500 

+2,533 

+382,592 

-834,867 

-104,547 

-45,151 

+922,900 

+514,567 

-72,200 

+380,702 

-538 295 

-76 167 

-16 000 

+30 916 

-599,546 

-11,093 

+50,000 

+202,655 
119 

SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS

Items for which additional funds have been provided as shown in 

the project level tables or in paragraphs using the phrase ‘‘only for’’ 

or ‘‘only to’’ in this report are congressional interest items for the 

purpose of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of 

these items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated 

amount specifically addressed in the Committee report. These 

items remain special interest items whether or not they are repeated in a subsequent conference report. 

REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR ACQUISITION ACCOUNTS

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to continue to 

follow the reprogramming guidance as specified in the report accompanying the House version of the fiscal year 2008 Department 

of Defense Appropriations bill (House Report 110–279). Specifically, 

the dollar threshold for reprogramming funds will remain at 

$20,000,000 for procurement and $10,000,000 for research, development, test and evaluation. 

The Secretary shall continue to follow the limitation that prior 

approval reprogrammings are set at either the specified dollar 

threshold or 20 percent of the procurement or research, development, test and evaluation line, whichever is less. These thresholds 

are cumulative from the base for reprogramming value as modified 

by any adjustments. Therefore, if the combined value of transfers 

into or out of a procurement (P–1) or research, development, test 

and evaluation (R–1) line exceeds the identified threshold, the Secretary of Defense must submit a prior approval reprogramming to 

the congressional defense committees. In addition, guidelines on 

the application of prior approval reprogramming procedures for 

congressional special interest items are established elsewhere in 

this report. 

REPROGRAMMING REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) to continue to provide the congressional defense committees 

quarterly, spreadsheet-based DD Form 1416 reports for Service 

and defense-wide accounts in titles III and IV of this Act as required in the explanatory statement accompanying the Department 

of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006. 

FUNDING INCREASES

The Committee directs that the funding increases outlined in 

these tables shall be provided only for the specific purposes indicated in the tables. 

CLASSIFIED ANNEX

Adjustments to the classified programs are addressed in a classified annex accompanying this report. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
120 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $6,028,754,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 5,024,387,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 5,236,653,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +212,266,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the acquisition of tactical 

and utility airplanes and helicopters, including associated electronics, electronic warfare equipment for in-service aircraft, ground 

support equipment, components and parts such as spare engines, 

transmission gear boxes, and sensor equipment. It also funds related training devices such as combat flight simulators and production base support. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
121 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 61 here 80986A.060

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OW AMOUNT QTy AMOUNT aTY AMOUNT 

-- -- --- -- ~ -- -------------------------- +---------------

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

AIRCRAFT 

FIXED WING 

UTILITY F/W CARGO AIRCRAFT 19,730 19,730 

AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) 142,050 84,700 -57,350 

MO-1 UAV. 15 518,460 15 506,976 -11 ,484 

RO-11 (RAVEN) 10.772 10,772 

ROTARY 

HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH). 10 96,227 31 231,327 +21 +135,100 

AH-64 APACHE BLOCK IlIA REMAN, 42 608.469 42 608,469 

AH-64 APACHE BLOCK IlIA REMAN (AP-CY) 150,931 150,931 

AH-64 APACHE BLOCK IIlS NEW BUILD (AP-CY) . 

11 UH - 60 BLACKHAWK (MYP) 65 1,046,976 73 1.192,976 +8 +146,000 

12 UH-60 BLACKHAWK (MYP) (AP-CY) . 116,001 116.001 

13 CH-47 HELICOPTER. 28 801,650 26 801,650 

14 CH-47 HELICOPTER (AP-CY) 98,376 98,376 

------------ TOTAL, AIRCRAFT 3,609,642 3,821.908 +212,266 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

15 MQ-1 PAYLOAD - UAS. 97,781 97,781 

16 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) 10,262 10,262 

17 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) . 12.467 12,467 

18 AH-64 MODS. 53,559 53,559 

19 CH-47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS. 149,764 149,764 

20 UTILITY ICARGO AIRPLANE MODS 17,500 17,500 

21 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS 167 74,095 167 74,095 

22 KIOWA WARRIOR. 184,044 184,044 

23 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN 152,569 152.569 

24 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE. 92,779 92,779 

25 GATM ROLlUP. 65,613 65,613 

26 RO- 7 UAV MODS. 121.902 121,902 

--- ~. ~ ~ -~. -- -- -- --- _. ~ -~ 

TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT. 1,032,335 1,032,335 
122 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 62 here 80986A.061

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 

GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 

27 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT, 

28 SURVIVABILITY CM 

29 CMWS, 

OTHER SUPPORT 

30 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, 

31 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT, 

32 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS. 

33 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 

34 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 

35 LAUNCHER, 2,75 ROCKET, 

TOTAL, SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES, 

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY, 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT 

47,610 

5,700 

126,869 

705 6,809 

65,397 

45,841 

79,692 

1,615 

2,877 

------------

382,410 

------------ 5,024,387 

============ 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

47,610 

5,700 

126,869 

705 6,809 

65,397 

45,841 

79,692 

1,615 

2,877 

382,410 

5,236,653 

============ 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT 

+212,266 

============ 
123 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 63 here 80986A.062

P·l 

11 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL TABLES 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) 142,050 84,700 

Funding ahead of need ·57,350 

MQ·1 UAV GRAY EAGLE 518,460 506,976 

Ground equipment ahead of need ·11,484 

HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) 96,227 231,327 

Program increase only for UH-72A aircraft 115,100 

Program increase only for fielding UH-72A aircraft 20,000 

UH·60 BLACKHAWK (MYP) 1,046,976 1,192,976 

Program increase only for the Army National Guard 146,000 

Change from 

Request 

·57,350 

·11,484 

135,100 

146,000 
124 

UH–60 HELICOPTERS FOR THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

The Committee is aware that the Army National Guard operates 

a fleet of 849 Black Hawk helicopters. Over half of these helicopters are older model, high time UH–60A variants. Under the 

proposed modernization plan for the total Army, the National 

Guard fleet will be older, less capable, and less reliable. At the end 

of fiscal year 2013, it is estimated that the National Guard Black 

Hawk fleet will be composed of 484 UH–60A models, 289 UH–60L 

models with the older analog cockpit, and only 76 of the newest 

UH/HH–60M models. The UH–60A aircraft need to be modernized 

or replaced as quickly as possible for the Army National Guard 

Black Hawk fleet to remain viable and mission capable. The Committee understands that the Army is changing the prioritization 

and sequence of modernization of UH–60A Black Hawks to divest 

the active component of their last approximately 300 A-models faster and to delay modernization for the Army National Guard. The 

Committee recognizes the critical role Black Hawk helicopters 

serve in the Army National Guard for their war time and homeland security missions. The budget request includes $1,046,976,000 

to purchase UH–60M helicopters. The Committee recommendation 

is $1,192,976,000, an increase of $146,000,000 above the budget request only for the purchase of Black Hawk UH–60M helicopters for 

the Army National Guard. 

UH–72A LAKOTA LIGHT UTILITY HELICOPTER

The budget request includes $96,227,000 for the procurement of 

ten Lakota Light Utility helicopters. The Army’s helicopter program had called for 31 Lakota aircraft to be funded in fiscal year 

2014. The program has consistently achieved cost, schedule, and 

performance goals. The concept for the Lakota program has worked 

as the Army had envisioned. The less expensive Lakota, purchased 

as a commercial aircraft and non-deployable, has been assigned to 

utility missions that previously had been accomplished by a Black 

Hawk, thus freeing a Black Hawk for combat duty. The Army still 

has a Black Hawk shortfall and the concept to substitute Lakotas 

for Black Hawks in non-combat duty remains valid. The Committee 

recommendation includes $231,327,000 for the purchase of 31 UH– 

72A Lakota Light Utility helicopters, an increase of $135,100,000 

above the budget request. 

ENHANCED MEDIUM ALTITUDE RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEILLANCE

SYSTEM

The budget request includes $142,050,000 to purchase four low 

rate initial production units of the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance System (EMARSS). The Committee 

is aware that fiscal year 2013 Research, Development, Test and 

Evaluation, Army funds were planned for the purchase of two developmental aircraft. The division of roles and missions for intelligence gathering capability based on the C–12 type platform has 

shifted, and the Army will maintain intelligence gathering structure rather than the Air Force serving as the sole provider. The 

mission shift based on the revised vision for this mission area has 

resulted in a schedule slip of one year. Accordingly, the recVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00134 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
125 

ommendation provides funding of $84,700,000 for EMARSS, a reduction of $57,350,000 below the budget request. 

MQ–1 GRAY EAGLE

The budget request includes $518,460,000 for the procurement of 

MQ–1 Gray Eagles, which includes 15 unmanned aerial vehicles 

and ground equipment. The Committee has strongly supported 

Army control and operation of multi-mission unmanned aerial systems with capabilities for attack, communications relay, support for 

reconnaissance and surveillance, special operations support, deep 

fires support, and others. The Committee is aware that the MQ– 

1 Gray Eagle will align fielding of Universal Ground Control Stations and Satellite Ground Data Terminals with the fielding of 

Automatic Take-off and Landing Systems. The Committee recommends $506,976,000, a decrease of $11,484,000 below the budget 

request for Universal Ground Control Stations and Satellite 

Ground Data Terminals that are ahead of need. 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $1,535,433,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 1,334,083,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 1,628,083,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +294,000,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the acquisition of surfaceto-air, surface-to-surface, air-to-surface, and anti-tank/assault missile systems. Also included are major components, modifications, 

targets, test equipment, and production base support. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
126 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 64 here 80986A.063

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

OTHER MISSILES 

SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 

MSE MISSILE. 

AIR· TO~SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY 

ANTI - TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYSTEM 

JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY. 

TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY 

TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY (AP-Cy)" 

GUIDED MlRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 

MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) , 

TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES. 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

MODIFICATIONS 

10 PATRIOT MODS 

11 STINGER MODS < 

12 lTAS/TOW MODS 

13 MLRS MODS. 

14 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS. 

TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF MISSILES. 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

15 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS. 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 

16 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS 

17 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES). 

18 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 

TOTAL, SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES. 

TOTAL, MISSI LE PROCUREMENT, ARMY. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

56 540.401 

4,464 

449 110,510 

988 49,354 

19,965 

1,788 237,216 

2,412 19,022 

-------.---- 980,932 

256,438 

37.252 

20,000 

11,571 

6,105 

- _ .. --- --- - ~ 

331 < 366 

11,222 

3530 

1,748 

5,285 

-" ~ --- -- --_. 10.563 

.-.... _----- 1,334,083 

=:::========== 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

OW AMOUNT 

96 740.401 

4,464 

449 110,510 

988 49,354 

19,965 

1,788 237,216 

2,412 19.022 

----------.-

1,180,932 

350,438 

37.252 

20,000 

11,571 

6,105 

._---_ .... --

425,366 

11,222 

3.530 

1,748 

5,285 

10,563 

-- --- _. -~ ~ -- 1,628,083 

============ 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT 

+40 +200.000 

+200,000 

+94,000 

+94, 000 

+294,000 
127 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 65 here 80986A.064

P-1 

10 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL TABLES 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

MSE Missile 540,401 740,401 

Program increase 200,000 

PATRIOT MODS 256,438 350,438 

Program increase only for Radar Digital Processors 94,000 

Change from 

Request 

200,000 

94,000 
128 

PROCUREMENT OF WEAPONS AND TRACKED COMBAT 

VEHICLES, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $1,857,823,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 1,597,267,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 1,545,560,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥51,707,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the acquisition of tanks; 

personnel and cargo carriers; fighting vehicles; tracked recovery vehicles; self-propelled and towed howitzers; machine guns; mortars; 

modification of in-service equipment, initial spares; and production 

base support. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
129 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 66 here 80986A.065

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT 

------------ -- --~. -- -- .. ----

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

STRYKER VEHICLE. 374,100 374,100 

MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

STRYKER (MOD) 20,522 20,522 

FIST VEHICLE (MOD) 29.965 29,965 

BRADLEY PROGRAM 1 MOD) 158,000 158,000 

HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 IMOD) 4,769 4,769 

PALADIN PIPM MOD IN SERVICE 18 260,177 1B 217,177 ~43,OOO 

IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) 32 111,031 53 186,031 +21 +75,000 

ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) 2,500 2.500 

ARMORED BREACHER VEHICLE. 14 62,951 14 62.951 

10 M88 FOV MODS. 28,469 28,469 

11 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE 2,002 2,002 

12 M 1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) 178,100 178,100 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 

14 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV) 1,544 1,544 

_. ~. ~ + + _ ••• - . ~. - ~" ..... -

TOTAL, TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES. 1,234,130 1,266,130 +32,000 

WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 

15 INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYS FAMILY, 1,424 69,147 1,424 10,147 -59,000 

18 MORTAR SYSTEMS 5,310 5,310 

19 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE IGLM) 5,061 24,049 5,061 24,049 

21 CARBINE. 41 ,897 70,846 41 ,897 46,139 -24,707 

23 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION. 242 56.5BO 242 56,580 

24 HANDGUN 300 300 
130 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 67 here 80986A.066

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 

26 M777 MODS, 

27 M4 CARBINE MODS. 

28 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS. 

29 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS. 

30 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS. 

31 SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS, 

32 M119 MODIFICATIONS 

33 M16 RIFLE MODS, . 

34 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5. OM (WOCV-WTCV) 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 

35 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.011 (WOCV-WTCV) 

36 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCY -WTCY) 

37 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS. 

38 S~lALl ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) 

TOTAL, WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES, 

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY < • 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

aTY AMOUNT 

39,300 

10,300 

33,691 

7,608 

2,719 

7,017 

18,707 

2,136 

1,569 

2,024 

10,108 

459 

1,267 

-~. ---~. ---- 363,137 

1,597,267 

============ 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

OTY AMOUNT 

39,300 

10.300 

33,691 

7,608 

2,719 

7,017 

18.707 

2,136 

1,569 

2,024 

10,108 

459 

1,267 

279,430 

1,545,560 

==:=====0:::::=:== 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

aTY AMOUNT 

~83, 707 

-51.707 

============ 
131 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 68 here 80986A.067

P·1 

15 

21 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL TABLES 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

PALADIN PIM MOD IN SERVICE 260,177 217,177 

Funding ahead of need ·43,000 

IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) 111,031 186,031 

Program increase 75,000 

INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYS FAMILY 69,147 10,147 

Schedule slip ·59,000 

CARBINE 70,846 46,139 

Schedule slip -24,707 

Change from 

Request 

-43,000 

75,000 

·59,000 

.24,707 
132 

PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PALADIN PIM)

The budget request includes $260,177,000 for the procurement of 

18 sets of Paladin PIM self-propelled howitzers and self-propelled 

ammunition carriers. However, the Committee is aware that milestone C for Paladin PIM is likely to slip into fiscal year 2014. The 

Committee understands that the slip is due in part to delays in 

audit certification of certain major suppliers. The contract award 

currently scheduled for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 will 

likely slip into fiscal year 2014, and funds totaling $161,000,000 

would not be executed in fiscal year 2013. However, the Committee 

is aware of plans to use $97,000,000 of fiscal year 2013 procurement funds from the Paladin PIM program as a reprogramming 

source, reducing the amount that the program is expected to carry 

into fiscal year 2014. The Committee recommendation provides 

$217,177,000, a reduction of $43,000,000 below the budget request. 

M–88A2 HERCULES IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE

The budget request includes $111,031,000 for the procurement of 

32 Improved Recovery Vehicles. The Committee is aware of the significant operational and safety advantages of the Hercules. The primary improvement is that the heavier and more powerful Hercules 

can tow an Abrams tank without the requirement for a brake vehicle. Additionally, the Hercules is faster and better armored. The 

Committee recommendation is $186,031,000, an increase of 

$75,000,000 above the budget request which will provide for the 

procurement of 21 additional Improved Recovery Vehicles. 

INTEGRATED AIRBURST WEAPONS SYSTEM

The budget request includes $69,147,000 to begin production and 

fielding of the Integrated Air Burst Weapons System Family. The 

weapon is designed to determine the range to the target and then 

fire a 25mm projectile which explodes as it passes above the enemy 

defilade position. However, the weapon system has experienced 

safety issues that will delay Milestone C for eight to ten months 

while the Army and the developer design, integrate, and test a solution. Milestone C will slip from the fourth quarter of fiscal year 

2013 to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014. The Committee recommendation provides $10,000,000 for the program, a reduction of 

$59,147,000 below the budget request. 

CARBINE

The budget request includes $70,846,000 for carbines; 

$49,592,000 to purchase 29,897 new model Individual Carbines, 

and $21,254,000 to purchase 12,000 M4A1 carbines. The Committee is aware that the Full Rate Production Decision for the Individual Carbines program is scheduled for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014 and will likely slip into fiscal year 2015. The Committee recommends funding of $24,885,000 to purchase 15,000 new 

Individual Carbines, a reduction of $24,707,000 and 14,897 carbines below the budget request. The Committee supports the purchase of 12,000 M4A1 Carbines as requested. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
133 

M1 ABRAMS TANK PRODUCTION

The Committee is aware of the uncertainty facing the M1 

Abrams tank program. Production of M1A2 SEP tanks for the 

Army is scheduled to be completed by December 2014. Beyond that 

date, the Army and the contractor will rely to a great degree on 

foreign military sales to help sustain operation of the tank assembly facility until such time as work on Engineering Change Proposal One begins. The Committee also understands that the results 

of the Army force structure review will be released in the summer 

of 2013 and may well have fewer requirements for heavy Army battalions and heavy brigade combat teams. A significant number of 

M1A2 SEP tanks may be reassigned to Army National Guard Units 

that are currently equipped with M1A1s. The request includes no 

funds for the production of M1A2 tanks; however the Committee 

will continue to monitor Army force structure changes and the resulting impact on the required number of M1A2 tanks. 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $1,641,306,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 1,540,437,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 1,465,937,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥74,500,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the acquisition of ammunition, modification of in-service stock, and related production base 

support including the maintenance, expansion, and modernization 

of industrial facilities and equipment. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
134 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 69 here 80986A.068

10 

11 

12 

13 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 

AMMUNITION 

SMALLiMEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

CTG, 5 56NM, ALL TYPES, 

CTG, 7. 62MM, ALL TYPES. 

eTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES. 

CTG, .50 CAL, All TYPES. 

CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES. 

CTO, 30HM, ALL TYPES. 

CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES. 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES. 

81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES. 

120MM MORTAR, All TYPES. 

TANK AMMUNITION 

CTG TANK 105MM AND 120MM: ALL TYPES 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

14 CTG, ARTY, 75MM AND 1 05MM: ALL TYPES 

15 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, All TYPES. 

16 PRDJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE XM982. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

112,167 

58,571 

9,858 

80,037 

16,496 

69,533 

55,781 

38.029 

24,656 

60,781 

121,551 

39,825 

37,902 

802 67,896 

17 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL TYPE 71,205 

ROCKETS 

20 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS. ALL TYPES. 1,012 

21 ROCKET , HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES 108.476 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

22 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES. 24,074 

23 GRENADES, ALL TYPES 33,242 

24 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES. 7,609 

25 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES. 5,228 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

87,167 

53,571 

9,858 

55.037 

16,496 

50,033 

55,781 

38.029 

24,656 

60,781 

121,551 

39,825 

37,902 

802 67,896 

71 ,205 

1,012 

108,476 

24,074 

33,242 

7,609 

5,228 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

~25,OOO 

-5,000 

-25,000 

-19.500 
135 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 70 here 80986A.069

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

3' 

35 

MISCELLANEOUS 

AMMO COMPONENTS. ALL TYPES 

NON- LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES. 

CAD/PAD ALL TYPES. 

ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .. 

AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT. 

FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) 

CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES. 

TOTAL, AMMUNITION. 

AMMUNITION PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 

PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 

PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES. 

CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION, 

ARMS INITIATIVE. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

ALL 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

16.700 

7,366 

3,614 

12,423 

16,604 

14,328 

108 

---~ -_. - ~. -- 1,115,072 

242.324 

179,605 

3.436 

TOTAL, AMMUNITION PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT. 425,365 

------------ TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY, 1,540.437 

::::::======",=== 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

OTY AMOUNT 

16,700 

7,366 

3,614 

12.423 

16,604 

14,328 

108 

1,040,572 

242,324 

179,605 

3,436 

425,365 

------------

1,465,937 

============ 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-74,500 

-74,500 
136 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 71 here 80986A.070

P-1 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL TABLES 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

CTG, 5.56mm, ALL TYPES 112,167 87,167 

Army reported pricing and usage adjustment -25,000 

CTG, 7.62mm, ALL TYPES 58,571 53,571 

Army reported pricing and usage adjustment -5,000 

CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES 80,037 55,037 

Army reported pricing and usage adjustment -25,000 

eTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES 69,533 50,033 

Army reported pricing and usage adjustment -19,500 

Change from 

Request 

-25,000 

-5,000 

-25,000 

-19,500 
137 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $5,741,664,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 6,465,218,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 6,467,751,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +2,533,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the acquisition of tactical 

and commercial vehicles, including trucks, semi-trailers, and trailers of all types to provide mobility and utility support to field forces 

and the worldwide logistical system; communications and electronic 

equipment of all types to provide fixed, semi-fixed, and mobile strategic and tactical communications; and other support equipment, 

generators and power units, material handling equipment, medical 

support equipment, special equipment for user testing, and nonsystem training devices. In each of these activities, funds are also 

included for the modification of in-service equipment, investment 

spares and repair parts, and production base support. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
138 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 72 here 80986A.071

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT 

----------------- -~" . ---- ------ --- ~ -- -- - ---_. 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

TACTICAL AND SUPPORT VEHICLES 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS 25 4,000 25 4,000 

SEMITRAI LERS, FLATBED: 40 6,841 40 6,841 

FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) 837 223,910 837 223,910 

FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMEN 11,880 11,880 

FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) 220 14,731 220 14,731 

PLS ESP 74 44,252 74 44,252 

HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRuCK EXT SERV, 77 39<525 77 39.525 

11 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS. 746 51,258 746 17,000 -34,258 

12 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP 34 49,904 34 49,904 

13 NINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED MODS. 2,200 2,200 

NON- TACTICAL VEHICLES 

14 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN 400 400 

15 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES. 716 716 

16 NONTACTICAl VEHICLES, OTHER. 5,619 5,619 

--, ... ------ ------------

TOTAL, TACTICAL AND SUPPORT VEHICLES, 455,236 420,978 ·34.258 

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT 

COMM • JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 

18 WIN- T - GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK. 2,139 973,477 2,139 973,477 

19 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 14,120 14,120 

20 JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY, 7,869 7,869 

21 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) 5,296 5,296 

COMM - SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

22 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIOESAND SATCOM SYSTEMS. 31 147,212 31 120,003 ·27,209 

23 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS, 7,998 7,998 

24 SHF TERM 7,232 7,232 

25 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE) 3,308 3,308 

26 SMART·T (SPACE) 13,992 13,992 

28 GLOBAL BRDeST SVC - GBS. 94 28,206 94 28,206 

29 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT) 15 2,778 15 2,778 
139 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 73 here 80986A.072

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT 

COMM • C3 SYSTEM 

31 ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCeS) 

COMM . COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 

32 ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO) 

33 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM, 

34 MID· TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) 

35 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) 

36 SINCGARS FAMILY, 

37 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA2 .. 

38 TRACTOR DESK, 

40 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS. 

10,523 

130 

2,066 

41 TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM. .15,967 

42 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE. 

43 GUNSHOT DETECTION SYSTEM (GDS) 

44 RADIO. IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY, 

45 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE. 

COMM . INTELLIGENCE COMM 

48 Cl AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP) 

49 RESERVE CA/MISQ GPF EQUIPMENT. 323 

INFORMATION SECURITY 

50 TSEC - ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS) 

51 INFOi\MATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM· ISSP. 1,133 

52 ~AMIlY OF BIOMETRICS 

53 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC). 877 

COMM LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 

55 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS 

COHM - BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

57 INFORMATION SYSTEMS. 

58 DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS) 

59 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM. 

60 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM. 

17,590 17,590 

786 786 

382,930 10,523 382,930 

19.200 130 19,200 

1,438 1,438 

9.856 9,856 

14,184 2,066 14,184 

6,271 6,271 

1,030 1.030 

31,868 15,967 31,868 

18.000 18,000 

1,166 ,166 

22,867 

1,512 1,512 

61.096 323 61,096 

13,890 13,890 

23,245 1,133 23,245 

3.800 3,800 

24,711 877 24,711 

43,395 43,395 

104,577 104,577 

612 612 

39,000 39.000 

248,477 248,477 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 
140 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 74 here 80986A.073

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT 

------------- ------------------- -- ---- -- -- --- -- -- ~ 

ELECT EQUIP 

ELECT EQUIP - TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

64 JTT/CIBS-M (MIP) 824 824 

65 PROPHET GROUND (MIP) 10 59.198 10 59,198 

66 DRUG INTERDICTION PROGRAM (DIP) (TIARA) 

67 DCGS·A (MIP) 2,717 267.214 2,717 267,214 

68 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS). 9,899 9,899 

69 TROJAN (MIP) 24,598 24,598 

70 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) 1,927 1,927 

71 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL{CHARCS} (HIP) 6,169 6.169 

72 MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SYSTEM. 2,924 2,924 

ELECT EQUIP - ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

74 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR. 18 40,735 18 40,735 

75 EW PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT TOOLS. 13 13 

76 ENEMY UAS. 2,800 2,800 

79 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE !SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES, 1,237 1,237 

80 CI MODERNIZATION (HIP) 1.399 1,399 

ELECT EQUIP ~ TACTICAL SURV. (TAe SURV) 

81 FAAD GBS. 

82 SENTINEL MODS 86 47.983 86 47,983 

83 SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW). 142 142 

84 NIGHT VISION DEVICES. 6,879 202.428 6,879 202,428 

65 LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM. 5,183 5,183 

86 NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT. 14,074 14,074 

87 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF. 1,491 22,300 1,491 22,300 

89 GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM. 1,016 1,016 

90 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS. 55,354 55,354 

91 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP. 800 800 

92 PROFILER. 3,027 3,027 

93 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) 1,185 1,185 

94 JOINT BATTLE COMMANO . PLATFORM (JBC·P). 3,866 103,214 3,868 103,214 

96 MOD OF IN-SERVICE EQUIPMENT (LLDR) 167 26,037 167 26,037 

97 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM. 120 23,100 120 23,100 

98 COUNTERF I RE RADARS. 19 312J27 19 312,727 
141 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 75 here 80986A.074

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT 

-------------- -------------

ELECT EQUIP - TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 

101 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY. 574 43,228 574 43,228 

102 BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM, 167 14,446 167 14,446 

103 FAAD C2. 4,607 4,607 

104 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS (AMD. 33,090 33,090 

105 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM. 21 ,200 21 .200 

107 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) 1,795 1,795 

109 NETi-iORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE. 54,327 54,327 

110 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) 2,959 59,171 2.959 59,171 

111 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM·ARMY, 83,936 83,938 

113 LOGISTICS AUTOMATION. 25,476 25,476 

114 RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET. 212 19.341 212 19,341 

ELECT EQUIP - AUTOMATION 

115 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION. 11,865 11.865 

116 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT. 219,431 219,431 

117 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM. 6,414 6,414 

118 HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PROGRAM. 62,683 62,683 

120 RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) . 34,951 34,951 

ELECT EQUIP - AUDIO VISUAL SVS (A/V) 

121 ITEMS L::SS THAN S5,OM (AfY) 7,440 7,440 

122 ITEMS LESS THAN $SM (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) > 16 1,615 16 1.615 

ELECT EQUIP - SUPPORT 

123 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E) 554 554 

124 BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES. 20,000 20,000 

TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT. 4,266.066 4.238,857 ·27,209 

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 

126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) 762 762 

127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) 3,759 20,630 3,759 20,630 

128 CBRN SOLDIER PROTECTION, < .24,530 22,151 24,530 22.151 

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 

130 TACTICAL BRIDGING 14,188 14,188 

131 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON. 34 23,101 34 23,101 

132 COMNON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER RECAP 15,416 15,416 
142 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 76 here 80986A.075

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

DTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT 

------------------_ .. _--- ----------------

EQUIPMENT 

SYSTEM (GSTAMIDS) 311 50,465 311 50,465 

135 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 6,490 6,490 

136 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION. 1,563 1,563 

137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EOPMT (EOD EOPMT). 6.774 20,921 6,774 20,921 

138 REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS 1DO lDO 

139 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT. 7D 2,271 7D 2,271 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

140 HEATERS AND ECU'S. 464 7,269 464 7,269 

141 LAUNDR! ES, SHOWERS AND LATRINES, 2DD 20D 

142 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT 1,468 1,468 

143 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) 31 ,530 26,526 31 .530 26,526 

144 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM. 5,547 81,680 5,547 64,680 w17,000 

147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT. 217 28,096 217 28,096 

148 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM, 6,904 56,150 6,904 56,150 

149 MORTUARY AF!=AIRS SYSTEMS. 248 3,242 248 3,242 

150 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS. 289 38,141 289 38,141 

151 ITEMS LESS THAN S5M (ENG SPT) 21D 5,859 21D 5,859 

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 

152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER. 508 60,612 508 60,612 

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 

153 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL 3.258 22,042 3,258 22,042 

154 MEDEVAC MISSION EQUIPMENT PACKAGE (MEP) . 88 35,318 88 35.318 

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 

155 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS. 25 19,427 25 19,427 

156 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) 347 3,860 347 3,860 

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 

157 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CeE). 2,000 2.000 

1 59 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING 52 36,078 52 36,078 

160 MISSION MODULES - ENGINEERING ... 13 9,721 13 9,721 

162 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR 109 50,122 109 50,122 

163 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED. 84 28,828 84 28,828 

164 ALL TERRAIN CRANES 19 19.863 19 19,863 

166 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) FOS. 34 23,465 34 23,465 

168 ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP. 109 13,590 1D9 13,590 

169 CONST EQUIP ESP. 80 16,088 8D 16,088 
143 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 77 here 80986A.076

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT OTy AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT 

------------- ------------

170 ITEMS LESS THAN $5. OM (CONST EQUIP) 66 6,850 66 6,850 

RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 

171 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP 38,007 19,007 ·19,000 

172 ITEMS LESS THAN $5, OM (FLOAT/RAIL) . 10,605 10,605 

GENERATORS 

173 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. 5.239 129,437 5,239 129,437 

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

174 ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER. 1,250 1,250 

175 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS 60 8.260 60 8,260 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

176 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT. 309 121.710 309 121,710 

177 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM 8,181 225,200 8.181 225,200 

178 CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER. 15 30.063 15 30,063 

179 AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (AVCA. 34,913 34,913 

180 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING. 9,955 9,955 

TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMO) 

181 CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT, 8,241 8,241 

182 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) 1,810 67,506 1.810 67.506 

183 TEST EOUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) 2,105 18,755 2,105 18,755 

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

184 M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR. 647 5,110 647 5,110 

185 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 5,110 5,110 

186 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) 62,904 62,904 

187 BASE LEVEL COM'L EQUIPMENT. 1,427 1,427 

188 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (CPA-3) 1,936 96,661 1,936 96,661 

189 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH) 2.450 2,450 

190 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING, 69 11,593 69 11,593 

191 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3 1,597 8,948 1,597 8,948 

192 TRACTOR YARD 8,000 8,000 

--.. _ .. _---- TOTAL, OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,680,658 1,644,658 -36,000 
144 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 78 here 80986A.077

SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS 

195 INITIAL SPARES - C&E 

TOTAL. SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS, 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

15 59,700 

59,700 

3,558 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD HMMWV MODERNIZATION PROGRAM. 

------------ TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY. 6,465,218 

====::::======= 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

15 59,700 

-- -- ---. ~ _." 59,700 

3,558 

100,000 

6.467,751 

=====::::====== 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

+100,000 

+2,533 

============ 
145 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 79 here 80986A.078

P-1 

11 

22 

144 

171 

XX 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL TABLES 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS 51,258 17,000 

Schedule slip -34,258 

DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS 147,212 120,003 

Schedule slip -27,209 

GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM 81,680 64,680 

Cost growth -17.000 

ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP 38,007 19,007 

Funding ahead of need ·19,000 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD HMMWV MODERNIZATION 

PROGRAM 100,000 

Program increase only for the Army National Guard 100,000 

Change from 

Request 

·34,258 

-27,209 

·17,000 

·19,000 

100,000 
146 

JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM COMPETITION

The budget request includes $323,730,000 for the procurement of 

3,123 Joint Tactical Radio System manpack units. The Committee 

agrees with the guidance from the Undersecretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics) directing the Army to conduct 

a full and open competition, open to non-program of record vendors, 

during full-rate production of the manpack radio for the remaining 

inventory. The Committee strongly recommends that the Army 

drives cost savings and innovation by considering the full range of 

available contract vehicles at each option point, including the option of re-competing the work. 

SURGE CAPACITY FOR DOMESTIC BODY ARMOR

After twelve years of building domestic capacity, the Committee 

is aware that the ability to surge production for domestic hard body 

armor manufacturing may be in jeopardy. This critical capacity 

should be retained to ensure the Department of Defense can rapidly respond to future body armor surge requirements, to include 

female body armor. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense 

to report to the congressional defense committees not later than 90 

days after the enactment of this Act on the current capabilities of 

domestic body armor manufacturers to meet future surge requirements, the war reserve objective inventory requirement for body 

armor, and the steps taken by the Department to ensure the availability of domestic hard armor manufacturers. 

NATIONAL GUARD HMMWV MODERNIZATION PROGRAM

The budget request includes no funding for new HMMWVs for 

the Army National Guard. The Committee recommendation includes $100,000,000 for that purpose. The committee recognizes 

that the Army National Guard has consistently included new model 

HMMWVs among its top funding priorities. This funding will enable new model HMMWVs to be introduced quickly and efficiently 

into the fleet. The HMMWV will remain the backbone of the Army 

National Guard’s tactical wheeled vehicle fleet. Recent natural disasters such as Hurricane Sandy highlight the need for reliable and 

capable utility vehicles to enable the Guard to mobilize rapidly to 

respond immediately to state and national needs. 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $17,382,152,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 17,927,651,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 17,092,784,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥834,867,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the procurement of aircraft 

and related support equipment and programs; flight simulators; 

equipment to modify in-service aircraft to extend their service life, 

eliminate safety hazards and improve aircraft operational effectiveness; and spare parts and ground support equipment for all end 

items procured by this appropriation. 

The total amount recommended in this bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
147 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 80 here 80986A.079

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT OW AMOUNT OW AMOUNT 

----------------------

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

fA-laG. 21 2,001,787 21 1,870,424 -131,363 

F!A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP) 206,551 206,551 

F/A-18E/F (FIGHTERI HORNET (MYPI (AP-CYI 75, 000 +75,000 

JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER 1.135,444 1,076,115 -59,329 

JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (AP-CYI 94,766 94,766 

JSF STOVL. 1,267,260 1,200,498 -66,762 

JSF STOVL (AP-CYI 103.195 103,195 

V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) 18 1,432,573 18 1,409,573 -23.000 

10 V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) (AP-CYI 55,196 53,113 -2,083 

11 UH-1Y/AH-1Z 25 749,962 25 720,634 -29.328 

12 UH-1Y/AH-1Z (AP-CY) 71,000 71,000 

13 MH-60S (MYPI 18 383,831 18 364,921 -18,910 

14 MH-60S (MYPI (AP-CYI 37,278 30,790 -6,488 

15 MH-60R 19 599,237 19 596,833 -2,404 

16 MH-60R (AP-CY) 231,834 224,120 ·7.714 

17 P-8A POSEIDON, 16 3,189,989 16 3,121,365 -68,624 

18 P-8A POSEIDON (AP-CYI 313,160 293,660 -19,500 

19 E-2D ADV HAWKEYE, 997,107 960,572 -36,535 

20 E-20 ADV HAWKEYE (AP-CY) 266,542 263,623 -2,919 

---------*-- -,--------,. TOTAL, COMBAT AIRCRAFT 13,136,712 12.736,753 ·399,959 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

22 JPATS. 29 249,080 29 249,080 

------------ TOTAL, TRAINER AIRCRAFT. 249,080 249,080 
148 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 81 here 80986A.080

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT OW AMOUNT ory AMOUNT 

-- - --- -- -- ~ - -- - _. ----- ---- ---- -----~ - ~ -- - ---. --~ _. -- --- -. - - -

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

23 KC~130J 134,358 134,358 

24 KC-130J (AP-CY) 32,288 32,288 

25 RQ·4 UAV (AP-CY) 52,002 -52,002 

26 MQ-8 UAV 60,980 60,980 

28 OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT, 14,958 14,958 

_._---+---"- TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT. 294,586 242,584 ~52,OO2 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

29 EA~6 SERIES. 18,577 17,477 -1,100 

30 AEA SYSTEMS. 48,502 44,802 -3,700 

31 AV-8 SERIES. 41.575 39.229 "2,346 

32 ADVERSARY, 2,992 2,992 

33 F-18 SERIES. 875.371 771.366 -104,005 

34 H-46 SERIES. 2.127 2.127 

36 H-53 SERIES. 67,675 60,581 -7,094 

37 SH-60 SERIES. 135,054 121 ,018 -14,036 

38 H-1 SERIES. 41,706 41 .706 

39 EP·3 SERIES. 55,903 49,347 -6,556 

40 P-3 SERIES. 37,436 36,788 -648 

41 £-2 SERIES. 31,044 26,233 -4,811 

42 TRAINER Arc SERIES, 43,720 12.066 -31 ,654 

43 C-2A. 902 902 

44 C-130 SERIES. 47,587 46,393 -1.194 

45 FEWSG. 665 665 

46 CARGOfTRANSPORT Ale SERIES. 14,587 14,587 

47 E-6 SERIES. 189.312 157,549 -31 .763 

48 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES, 85,537 80,537 -5.000 
149 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 82 here 80986A.081

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

60 

61 

62 

63 

64 

65 

66 

67 

68 

69 

70 

71 

SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT 

T-45 SERIES. 

POWER PLANT CHANGES 

JPATS SERIES, 

AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS, 

COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT. 

COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES. 

COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM. 

10 SYSTEMS 

P-8 SERIES. 

MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION 

MO-8 SERIES, 

RQ-7 SERIES. 

V-22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY, 

F-35 STOVL SERIES. 

F-35 CV SERIES 

TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS. 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 

COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT. 

AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 

WAR CONSUMABlES, 

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 

SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, 

FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

3,684 

98,128 

22.999 

1,576 

6,267 

141,685 

120,660 

3,554 

41,800 

9,485 

14,431 

1,001 

26,433 

160,834 

147,130 

31,100 

2,571,039 

1,142.461 

410,044 

27,450 

28,930 

5.268 

60,306 

1,775 

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 533,773 

- ---- --_. ~ _. TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY, 17,927,651 

============ 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

3.684 

93,128 

22,999 

1,576 

6,267 

128.893 

115,683 

3,554 

38,303 

9,485 

14,431 

22,117 

156,534 

73,035 

2.336 

2,218,390 

1,142,461 

382,987 

24,250 

28,930 

5,268 

60,306 

1,775 

503,516 

-----.-.----

17,092,784 

============ 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-5,000 

·12,792 

-4,977 

·3,497 

-1,001 

-4,300 

-74,095 

-28,764 

·352,649 

·27.057 

-3.200 

-30,257 

·834,867 
150 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 83 here 80986A.082

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

P-1 Request Recommended Request 

EA-18G 2,001,787 1,870,424 -131,363 

Excess advance procurement from prior year -45,000 

Production engineering support funding carryover -11,650 

Non~recurring engineering funding carryover -8,800 

GFE electronics cost growth -5,943 

Other GFE cost growth -1,180 

Excess engineering change order funding -8,790 

Increased foreign military sales -50,000 

4 f/A-18E/f (fiGHTER) HORNET (MYP) (AP-CY) 75,000 75,000 

Advance procurement for 22 F/A-18E/F aircraft 75,000 

JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER 1,135,444 1,076,115 -59,329 

Airframe/CFE cost growth -7,024 

Engine cost growth -2,552 

Aitirame PGSE growth -35,000 

Engine PGSE growth -9,000 

Unit cost savings due to life of type buys previously funded -5,753 

JSF STOVL 1,267,260 1,200,498 -66,762 

Engine cost growth -47,586 

NRE growth -10,000 

Unit cost savings due to life of type buys previously funded -9,176 

V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) 1,432,573 1,409,573 -23,000 

Production engineering support funding carryover -23,000 

10 V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) (AP-CY) 55,196 53,113 -2,083 

Excess advance procurement for fiscal year 2015 aircraft -2,083 

11 UH-1Y/AH·1Z 749,962 720,634 ·29,328 

UH-1Y GFE electronics cost growth -4,505 

Production engineering support funding carryover -5,223 

UH-1Y trainer contract award delay -16,500 

AH-1 Z GFE electronics cost growth -3,100 

13 MH·60S (MYP) 383,831 364,921 -18,910 

Production !ine shutdown ahead of need -18,910 

14 MH-60S (MYP) (AP-CY) 37,278 30,790 -6,488 

Excess advance procurement -6,488 

15 MH-60R 599,237 596,833 -2,404 

GFE electronics cost growth -2,404 

16 MH-60R (AP-CY) 231,834 224,120 -7,714 

Excess advance procurement -7.714 

17 P-8A POSEIDON 3,189,989 3,121,365 -68,624 

Airframe/CFE cost growth -18,624 

Support eqUipment growth -50,000 

18 P-8A POSEIDON (AP-CY) 313,160 293,660 -19,500 

Excess advance procurement due to reduced fiscal year 

2014 quanlily -19,500 
151 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 84 here 80986A.083

Budget Committee Change from 

P·1 Request Recommended Request 

19 E·20 ADY HAWKEYE 997,107 960,572 ·36,535 

Non-recurring growth -35,000 

GFE electronics cost growth -1,535 

20 E-2D ADY HAWKEYE (AP·CY) 266,542 263,623 ·2,919 

Advance procurement cost growth -2,919 

25 RQ·4 UAY (AP·CY) 52,002 ·52,002 

Advance procurement previously appropriated -52,002 

29 EA·6 SERIES 18,577 17,477 ·1,100 

Olher support growth (OSIP 001·01) -1,100 

30 AEASYSTEMS 48,502 44,802 ·3,700 

Low band transmitter cost growth (OSIP 007-11) -1,200 

installation equipment non-recurring growth (OSIP 007-11) -1,500 

Integrated logistics support growth (OSIP 007-11) -1,000 

31 AY·8 SERIES 41,575 39,229 ·2,346 

Excess support funding (OSIP 023-00) ·2,346 

33 F·18 SERIES 875,371 771,366 ·104,005 

DCS (WRA) B-kits previously appropriated (OSIP 10·99) ·8,600 

Non-recurring installation kits growth (OSIP 11-99) -5,000 

Installation equipment non-recurring forward funded (OSIP 

11-99) -3,000 

Installation funding forward funded (OS!P 11-99) ·24,700 

Installation equipment non-recurring growth (OSIP 21-00) ·2,000 

Integrated logistics support growth (OSIP 14·03) -8,000 

ECP 6038 radome kits cost growth (OSIP 002-07) -2,952 

Retrofit radars (APG-79B) cost growth (OSIP 002·07) ·9,900 

ECP 6279 module kits cost growth (OSIP 002-07) -4,864 

APG-65173179 obsolescence growth (OSIP 002-07) -4,000 

Other support and ILS ahead of need (OSIP 04-14) ·20,989 

Interactive electronic technical manual software growth 

(OSIP 018-14) ·4,000 

Data growth (OSIP 018·04) ·6,000 

36 H-53 SERtES 67,675 60,581 ·7,094 

Engine reliability improvement program kit contract delay 

(OSIP 010-05) -2,270 

Engine reliability improvement program kit installation 

funding ahead of need due to contract delay (OS!P 010-

~S) ·3,717 

OIRCM installation funding cost growth (OSIP 010-08) -1,107 

37 SH·60 SERIES 135,054 121,018 ·14,036 

APRDD 8-kit cost growth (OSIP 001-06) -1,430 

Excess other support funding (OSIP 001-06) -4,322 

Other support growth (OSIP 009-07) -3,000 

ECP 4039 installation funding ahead of need (OSIP 009-07) ·3,900 

ECP 2046 installation funding previously appropriated 

(OSIP 009-07) ·1,384 

39 EP·3 SERIES 55,903 49,347 ·6,556 

JMOD installation funding ahead of need (OSIP 11-01) -6,556 
152 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 85 here 80986A.084

40 P-3 SERIES 37,436 36,788 -648 

C4 for ASW link-16 installation funding cost growth (OSIP 

029-94) -648 

41 E-2 SERIES 31,044 26,233 -4,811 

Other support funding growth (OSIP 005-01) -2,000 

Dual transmit SATCOM ahead of need (OSIP 008-14) -2,811 

42 TRAINER AlC SERIES 43,720 12,066 -31,654 

Excess ECO and ILS funding (OSIP 005-04) -5,500 

Obsolescence installation cost growth (OSIP 005·04) -3,255 

TH-57 upgrade program restructure (OSIP 006-07) -22,899 

44 C-130 SERIES 47,587 46,393 -1,194 

B-kit cost growth (OSIP 022-07) -1,194 

47 E-6 SERIES 189,312 157,549 -31,763 

Carbon brakes installation funding ahead of need (OSIP 

003-04) -157 

SLEP phase III kit installation funding cost growth (OSIP 

012-07) -416 

Training equipment funding previously appropriated (OS!P 

008-10) -15,700 

MR-TCDL installation funding ahead of need (OSIP 013-

10) -2,296 

Training equipment non~recurring growth (OSIP 013-10) -4,100 

APU kit contract savings (OSIP 002-12) -3,000 

FAB-T funding previously appropriated (OSIP 014-14) -6,094 

48 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES 85,537 80,537 -5,000 

Installation kits non~recurring growth (OS!P 023~O9) -5,000 

50 T-45 SERIES 98,128 93,128 -5,000 

Non-recurring costs double budgeted (OSIP 008-95) -5.000 

54 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT 141,685 128,893 -12,792 

Other support funding growth (OSIP 014-90) -2,000 

ALQ-214 contract savings (OSIP 004-12) -7,792 

Other support funding carryover (OSIP 004~12) -3,000 

55 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES 120,660 115,683 -4,977 

NAVWAR contract savings (OSIP 71-88) -447 

12 NAVWAR kits ahead of need (OSIP 71-88) -1,056 

Installation kits non-recurring previously appropriated 

(OSIP 21-01) -2,999 

BFSA installation funding ahead of need (OSIP 10~11) -475 

57 10 SYSTEMS 41,800 38,303 -3,497 

Mode 5 IFF kit cost growth (OSIP 15-03) -3,497 

60 MQ-8 SERIES 1,001 -1,001 

Modification funding ahead of need (OSIP 021-14) -1,001 

61 RQ-7 SERIES 26,433 22,117 -4,316 

P31 kit cost growth (OSIP 006-11) -4,316 

62 V-22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY 160,834 156,534 -4,300 

Slim MFD kit cost growth (OSIP 022-01) -4,300 
153 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 86 here 80986A.085

63 F-35 STOVL SERIES 147,130 73,035 -74,095 

Concurrency pricing adjustment (OSIP 023-14) -35,972 

Block 3 upgrade ahead of need (OSIP 015-14) -38,123 

64 F-35 CV SERIES 31,100 2,336 -28,764 

Concurrency pricing adjustment (OSIP 024-14) -1,150 

Block 3 upgrade ahead of need (OSIP 016-14) -27,614 

66 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT 410,044 382,987 -27,057 

Shipboard tractor contract delay -5,396 

eCASS cost growth -1,000 

Excess RT CASS installation funding -3,140 

Interactive avionics trainer rehost contract delay -2,529 

EA-68 devices visual/night vision upgrade contract delay -2,000 

USMC fed simulator CH-53E trainer contract delay -12,992 

67 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 27,450 24,250 -3,200 

Optical calibration standards cost growth -3,200 
154 

MH–60S AND MH–60R HELICOPTERS

The Committee understands that the Navy has identified a number of airframe upgrades for the MH–60R and MH–60S that are 

not funded in the future years defense program. These upgrades 

could prove to be valuable investments in the future as capability 

is added, likely increasing the weight of the aircraft. These helicopters have been in the fleet since 2001 and 2006, respectively, 

and are expected to remain in service as a critical Battle Group capability until at least 2030. Investing in keeping them current and 

relevant is important to future operational effectiveness and success. Therefore, the Secretary of the Navy is directed to develop a 

plan to keep these assets current and relevant for their expected 

lifetimes and to submit a report to the congressional defense committees that outlines this plan not later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act. 

MARINE CORPS UNMANNED AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK

The Committee is very encouraged by the addition of EA–18G 

Growler aircraft to the budget request for fiscal year 2014. Airborne electronic attack remains a high density/low demand asset in 

the Department of Defense and the Navy and Marine Corps are the 

sole providers of this capability using both the EA–6B Prowler and 

the EA–18G Growler aircraft. 

While the Navy will completely transition to the Growler aircraft, the Marine Corps will continue flying the Prowler aircraft 

until these aircraft are retired later this decade. The Committee is 

concerned about the follow-on airborne electronic attack capability 

of the Marine Corps after the Prowler aircraft are retired. With the 

rise in capability of unmanned aerial vehicles, the Committee believes these versatile platforms can be used for this critical mission. 

The Secretary of the Navy is directed to study the use of unmanned systems for organic airborne electronic attack to augment 

the Marine Corps current airborne electronic attack and electronic 

exploitation mission in whole or in part. This study should address 

such items as benefits, drawbacks, acquisition costs, estimated operating costs, limitations, crew safety, and mission effectiveness of 

unmanned systems compared to manned systems. The Secretary of 

the Navy is directed to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 90 days after the enactment of this 

Act on the findings of this study. 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $3,036,871,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 3,122,193,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 3,017,646,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥104,547,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the procurement of strategic and tactical missiles, target drones, torpedoes, guns, associated support equipment, and modification of in-service missiles, 

torpedoes, and guns. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
155 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 87 here 80986A.086

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

BALLISTIC MISSILES 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

TRIDENT II MODS. 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 

MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 

TOTAL, BALLISTIC MISSILES. 

OTHER MISSILES 

STRATEGIC MISSILES 

TOMAHAWK. 

TACTICAL MISSILES 

AMRAAM. 

SIDEWINDER. 

JSOW 

STANDARD MISSILE, 

RAM. 

HELLFIRE, 

STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITION. 

AERIAL TARGETS 

OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT. 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

ESSM. 

HARM MODS. 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 

WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES. 

FLEET SATELLITE COHM FOLLOW-ON. 

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

1.140,865 

7,617 

1,148,482 

196 312,456 

54 95,413 

225 117,208 

328 136,794 

81 367,985 

66 67,596 

363 33,916 

50 6,278 

41.799 

3,538 

53 76,749 

143 111,902 

,138 

23,014 

84,318 

1,480,104 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

OTY AMOUNT 

1.092,865 

7,617 

1,100,482 

196 312,456 

54 82,529 

225 111,689 

328 136,794 

81 343,773 

66 65,984 

363 32.341 

50 6.278 

39,657 

3.538 

53 76,749 

143 109,860 

1.138 

16,914 

84,318 

1,424,018 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-48,000 

-48,000 

·12,884 

-5,519 

-24,212 

-1,612 

-1.575 

-2,142 

-2,042 

·6,100 

-56,086 
156 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 88 here 80986A.087

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT aTY AMOUNT 

-" ................. ~. -................. -

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT 

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

18 SSTD, 3,978 3,978 

19 ASW TARGETS 8,031 7,135 -896 

MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

20 MK-46 TORPEDO MODS, 150 125,898 150 62,698 ·63,200 

21 MK·48 TORPEDO AOCAP MODS 108 53,203 108 48,503 ·4,700 

22 QUICKSTRIKE MINE 7,800 7,800 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

23 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, 59,730 54,489 -5,241 

24 ASW RANGE SUPPORT 4,222 4,222 

DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 

25 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION, 3,963 3,963 

........... - ------------ TOTAL, TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT, ' 266,825 192,788 -74,037 

OTHER WEAPONS 

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

26 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS, 12,513 12,513 

MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

27 CIWS MODS, 56,308 56,308 

28 COAST GUARD WEAPONS, , ' 10,727 6,783 ·3,944 

29 GUN MOUNT MODS, 72,901 59,52i -13,380 

30 CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS. 1,943 92,843 +90,900 

32 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS 19,758 19,758 

- --_. -- -- _. ~ 

TOTAL, OTHER WEAPONS, 174,150 247,726 +73,576 

33 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 52,632 52,632 

- --- --- ~. ~ .. TOTAL, WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY, . 3,122,193 3,017,646 ·104,547 

============ ============ 
157 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 89 here 80986A.088

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

TRIDENT II MODS 1,140,865 1,092,865 -48,000 

Rocket motor contract savings -48,000 

4 AMRAAM 95,413 82,529 ·12,884 

Unit cost adjustment -5,184 

Support funding carryover -7,700 

SIDEWINDER 117,208 111,689 ·5,519 

AU up round cost growth -2,685 

Captive air training missile cost growth -1,334 

Support funding carryover -1,500 

STANDARD MISSILE 367,985 343,773 ·24,212 

All up round cost growth -24,212 

RAM 67,596 65,984 ·1,612 

Guidance and control assembly contract savings -1,612 

HELLFIRE 33,916 32,341 ·1,575 

Support funding carryover -1,575 

11 AERIAL TARGETS 41,799 39,657 .2,142 

GQM-163A cost growth -2,142 

14 HARM MODS 111,902 109,860 ·2,042 

Excess support funding due to contract delay -2,042 

16 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW·ON 23,014 16,914 ·6,100 

Support funding carryover -6,100 

19 ASWTARGETS 8,031 7,135 ·896 

Expendable mobile ASW training target cost growth -896 

20 MK-46 TORPEDO MODS 125,898 62,698 ·63,200 

Support funding carryover -3,800 

MK-54 kits contract delay -59,400 

21 MK-48 TORPEDO AOCAP MODS 53,203 48,503 -4,700 

CBASS modification kit cost growth -2,800 

Support funding carryover -1,900 

23 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 59,730 54,489 ·5,241 

Support fundIng carryover -3,700 

F8100 propeUant contract delay -1,541 

28 COAST GUARD WEAPONS 10,727 6,783 ·3,944 

Machine gun equipment cost growth -3,944 

29 GUN MOUNT MODS 72,901 59,521 ·13,380 

MK38 gun kits cost growth -13,380 

30 CRUISER MOOERNIZATION WEAPONS 1,943 92,843 90,900 

Cruiser retention 90,900 
158 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY AND MARINE 

CORPS 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $659,897,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 589,267,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 544,116,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥45,151,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the acquisition of ammunition, ammunition modernization, and ammunition-related material 

for the Navy and Marine Corps. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
159 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 90 here 80986A.089

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE CORPS 

PROC AMMO, NAVY 

NAVY AMMUNITION 

GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 37,703 

AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES, 65,411 

MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION. 20,284 

PRACTICE BOMBS. 37,870 

CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES. 53,764 

AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES 67,194 

JATOS. 2,749 

LRLAP 6 lONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE" 3,906 

5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION. 24,151 

INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION 33,080 

OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION. 40,398 

SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO. 61,219 

PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION 10,637 

AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION 4,578 

------------ TOTAL, PROC AMMO, NAVY, 462,944 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

aTY AMOUNT 

37,703 

65,411 

20,284 

31,473 

53.764 

66,194 

2,749 

3,906 

21,726 

33,080 

40,398 

61,219 

10.637 

4,578 

453,122 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

~6, 397 

-1,000 

-2,425 

-9,822 
160 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 91 here 80986A.090

15 

16 

17 

18 

20 

22 

23 

26 

27 

28 

29 

PROC AMMO, MARINE CORPS 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION, 

LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES, 

40 MM, ALL TYPES, 

60MM, ALL TYPES> 

120MM, ALL TYPES. 

GRENADES. ALL TYPES. 

ROCKETS, ALL TYPES. 

FUZE, ALL TYPES, 

NON lETHALS 

AMMO MODERNIZATION, 

ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT 

26,297 

6,088 

7.644 

3,349 

13,361 

2,149 

27.465 

26,366 

8,403 

5,201 

TOTAL, PROC AMMO, MARINE CORPS 126,323 

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE CORPS, 589,267 

::::::==:======= 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

19,433 

6,088 

7,644 

3,349 

13,361 

2,149 

25,366 

8,403 

5,201 

90,994 

------------ 544,116 

============ 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-6,864 

-27,465 

-1,000 

-35,329 

-45,151 
161 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 92 here 80986A.091

P-l 

4 

15 

23 

26 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

PRACTICE BOMBS 37,870 31,473 

Q1010 MK-76 contract delay -5,000 

01040 MK-82 cost growth -1,397 

AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES 67,194 66,194 

ALE-55 cost growth -1.000 

5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION 24,151 21,726 

5"/54 full propellant charge cost growth -2.425 

SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION 26,297 19,433 

Various 5,56mm ammunition fOl"lNard funded -6,864 

ROCKETS, ALL TYPES 27,465 

83MM HEAA practice rocket contract delay -27,465 

FUZE, ALL TYPES 26,366 25,366 

Excess production engineering -1.000 

Change-from 

Request 

-6,397 

-1,000 

-2,425 

-6,864 

-27,465 

-1,000 
162 

SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $15,584,212,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 14,077,804,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 15,000,704,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +922,900,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the construction of new 

ships and the purchase and conversion of existing ships, including 

hull, mechanical and electrical equipment, electronics, guns, torpedo and missile launching systems, and communication systems. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
163 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 93 here 80986A.092

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT 

---------------- ------------- -------+----

SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY 

OTHER WARSHIPS 

CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (AP-CY) 944,S66 944,866 

VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE 2,930,704 3,880,704 +950, 000 

VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE (AP-CY) . 2,354,612 2,354,612 

CVN REFUELING OVERHAUL, 1,105.424 1,609,324 -96,100 

CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS (AP-CY) 245,793 245,793 

DOG 1000 231,694 231,694 

DOG-51 1,615.564 1,615,564 

DOG-51 (AP-CY) 388,551 388,551 

10 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP. 1,793,014 1,793,014 

---_._-_._-- TOTAL, OTHER WARSHIPS. 12,210,222 13,064,122 +853,900 

AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 

12 AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING BASE. 524,000 562.000 +38,000 

14 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL. 2,732 10,332 +7.600 

TOTAL, AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS, 526,732 572.332 +45,600 

AUXI LIARIES < CRAFT, AND PRIOR-YEAR PROGRAM COSTS 

16 MOORED TRAINING SHIP. 183,900 207.300 +23,400 

17 OUTFITTING 450,163 450,163 

19 LCAC SLEP. 80,987 80,987 

20 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS. 625,800 625.800 

-- -- _ .. - - ~ ~- --_ .. _------ TOTAL, AUXILIARIES, CRAFT , AND PRIOR-YEAR PROGRA 1,340,850 1,364.250 +23,400 

------------ TOTAL, SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY. 14,077,804 15,000,704 +922,900 

"'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::= ::::::=:::=::::::::::::=== :::=:::"'======== 
164 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 94 here 80986A.093

P-1 

12 

14 

16 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE 2,930,704 3,880,704 

Fully fund the Virginia class submarine program 950,000 

CVN REFUEliNG OVERHAUL 1,705,424 1,609,324 

Asset due to prior year above threshold reprogramming -96,100 

AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING BASE 524,000 562,000 

Program shortfall 38,000 

JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL 2,732 10,332 

Program shortfall 7,600 

MOORED TRAINING SHIP 183,900 207,300 

Program shortfa!t 23,400 

Change from 

Request 

950,000 

-96,100 

38,000 

7,600 

23,400 
165 

SHIPBUILDING

Despite assurances from the Navy that the shipbuilding account 

is as healthy as it has ever been, the Committee remains skeptical. 

The Navy’s new stated required fleet size is 306 ships, down from 

the long stated but never achieved fleet size of 313 ships. The annual 30 year shipbuilding report provided by the Navy shows that 

the fleet will reach the required fleet size of 306 ships in the year 

2037, a full quarter century from now. The Secretary of the Navy 

testified that the fleet size will reach the 300 ship mark by the end 

of the decade. While this is encouraging, the Committee is concerned the fleet size remains at 300 ships for a single year, then 

drops back under 300 until 2024. In fact, of the 30 years that comprise the plan, the fleet size is under 300 ships for 16 of these 

years. The fleet size is at the required 306 ships or above for only 

the final seven years (2037 to 2043) that are displayed in the report. The Committee believes a truly healthy shipbuilding program 

should reach and sustain the required fleet size sooner than the 

Navy is projecting. 

Additionally, the Navy requested authority to incrementally fund 

a Virginia Class Submarine in fiscal year 2014. The Congress has 

authorized and appropriated funding for 18 fully funded Virginia 

Class Submarines in the years prior to fiscal year 2014. The Committee does not understand why funding requested for this particular submarine requires violating the Department of Defense’s 

long standing full funding policy. The Committee is puzzled by 

Navy claims of billions of dollars in savings for the taxpayers as 

it is the Committee’s understanding that these savings come from 

the fact that the program is conducting a multi-year procurement 

of ten submarines and not from the fact that one of the submarines 

is incrementally funded. Quality budget discipline, not funding 

gimmicks, is called for more than ever in these times of decreasing 

budgets and budget uncertainty. 

Contributing to the poor health of the shipbuilding program is 

sequestration. As a direct result of sequestration, a minimum of 

seven destroyers and submarines from fiscal year 2013 and prior 

years are no longer fully funded. The cost to make the funding for 

these ships whole is just over $1,000,000,000. This funding will be 

required in the outyears to complete the construction of these 

ships. When this funding is added to the funding required to complete the incrementally funded submarine, the cost to complete 

these ships is in excess of $2,000,000,000. This represents funding 

that will not be available to purchase new equipment or increase 

readiness in future years, because it will have to pay the debt incurred by the Navy in years past. While sequestration is in statute, 

the Committee is extremely concerned about the Navy willfully 

adding to its outyear liabilities by incrementally funding a submarine. Therefore, the recommendation provides an additional 

$950,000,000 to the Virginia Class Submarine program to fully 

fund the program. Additionally, the Secretary of the Navy is directed to utilize the fiscal year 2015 funding currently reserved for 

the completion of the submarine to fully fund the ships and programs that were impacted by the sequestration reductions. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
166 

JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL

The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Navy to continue 

to explore missions and projects that leverage the flexibility of the 

Joint High Speed Vessel and explore the extension of the current 

mission envelope beyond in-theater transport, to include such capabilities as unmanned aerial systems and air surveillance. 

SHIP DECOMMISSIONINGS

The Committee is extremely disappointed in the Navy’s inaction 

with respect to the seven cruisers and two amphibious ships that 

were proposed for decommissioning in the fiscal year 2013 budget. 

Despite very clear direction from all four congressional defense 

committees to keep these ships in the fleet, the Navy has taken no 

steps that would indicate it is moving toward keeping the ships for 

the long term. The ships have significant life remaining and are 

less expensive to keep when compared to procuring new ships with 

similar capabilities. Last year the Congress provided sufficient 

funding for the operation and modernization of these ships through 

the end of fiscal year 2014 and that funding has gone largely untouched, indicating an unwillingness to commit to keep these ships 

in the fleet. The Committee fails to understand why the Navy 

would choose to decommission these ships when it is having such 

a difficult time maintaining the required fleet size through new 

procurements. 

Therefore, the Committee recommendation rescinds all modernization funding from the fiscal year 2013 Ship Modernization, 

Operations, and Sustainment Fund and re-appropriates the funding in the Other Procurement, Navy, Weapons Procurement, Navy, 

and Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy accounts. 

The Secretary of the Navy is directed to use this funding for the 

purpose of modernization of these seven cruisers and two amphibious ships and to retain them in the fleet. 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $5,955,078,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 6,310,257,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 6,824,824,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +514,567,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the procurement of major 

equipment and weapons other than ships, aircraft, missiles, and 

torpedoes. Such equipment ranges from the latest electronic sensors for updates of naval forces, to trucks, training equipment, and 

spare parts. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
167 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 95 here 80986A.094

{DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT 

-----_._ ..... _ .. ----------------------- --------------------

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

SHIPS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 

LM-2S00 GAS TURBINE 10,180 10,180 

ALLISON S01K GAS TURBINE. 5.536 S,S36 

HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED) 16,956 -16.956 

GENERATORS 

SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E. 19,782 16,129 -3,653 

NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 

OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT, 39,509 33,386 -6.123 

PERISCOPES 

SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP. 52.515 44,304 -8.211 

OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 

DOG MOD 285,994 285,994 

FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT, 14.389 14,389 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD. 2,436 2,436 

10 LHAfLHD MIDLIFE. 12,700 6,350 -6,350 

11 Lec 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE. 40,329 20,079 -20.250 

12 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT. 19,603 17.514 -2,089 

13 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 8.678 8,678 

14 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 74,209 69,241 -4.968 

15 LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 47,078 47,078 

16 SUBMARINE BATTERIES 37.000 37,000 

17 LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 25,053 20,425 ·4,628 

18 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP. 12,986 12.986 

19 DSSP EQUIPMENT 2,455 2.455 

20 CG - MODERN I ZATI ON 10,539 734,139 +723,600 

21 LCAC. 14,431 14,431 

22 UNDERWATER EGO PROGRAMS. 36,700 31,513 -5,187 

23 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION. 119,902 108,590 -11,312 

24 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS. 3,678 3,678 

25 SUBMARINE LIFE SuPPORT SYSTEM. 8,292 8,292 

REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 

27 REACTOR COMPONENTS. 286,744 286.744 
168 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 96 here 80986A.095

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

aTY AMOUNT aTY AMOUNT aTY AMOUNT 

-------------- ----------------- --_.----------------

OCEAN ENGINEERING 

28 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT. 8.780 6,854 -1,926 

SMALL BOATS 

29 STANDARD BOATS. 36,452 33,056 -3,396 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

30 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT, 36,145 36,145 

PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 

31 OPERATING FORCES IPE, 69,368 42,368 -27,000 

OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 

32 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS, 106,328 106,328 

33 LCS MODULES 45,966 38,266 -7,700 

34 Les MeM MISSION MODULES, 59,885 55,385 -4,500 

35 Les SUW MISSION MODULES. 37,168 37,168 

LOGISTICS SUPPORT 

36 LSD MIDLIFE 77,974 123,820 +45,846 

------------ TOTAL, SHIPS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,685,740 2,320,937 +635.197 

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT 

SHIP SONARS 

38 spa - 9B RADAR. 27,934 27.934 

39 ANJSQQ·89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM. 83,231 83,231 

40 SSN ACOUSTICS, 199,438 199,438 

41 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 9,394 9,394 

42 SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS 12,953 12,953 

43 ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC 8,958 8,958 

ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

44 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM. 24,077 24,077 

45 SSTD 11,925 8,500 -3,425 

46 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM, 94,338 94,338 

47 SURTASS 9,680 9,680 

48 TACTICAL SUPPORT CENTER 18,130 18,130 

ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 

49 ANISLQ-32. 203,375 129,883 -73,492 

RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 

50 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT 123,656 121 ,736 ·1 ,920 

51 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) , 896 896 

SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT 

52 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG, 49,475 44,429 -5,046 
169 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 97 here 80986A.096

------------------------

OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

53 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABI LITY. 

54 TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS). 

55 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM 

56 ATDLS 

57 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) 

58 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT. 

59 SHALLOW WATER MCM. 

60 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) , 

61 ARMED FORCES RADIO AND TV. 

62 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP. 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

63 OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT. 

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

64 MATCALS 

65 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL. 

66 AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM, 

67 NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM. 

68 AIR STATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 

69 MICROWAVE LANDING SYSTEM, 

70 10 SYSTEMS 

71 TAC AIC MISSION PLANNING SYS{TAMPS) 

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

72 DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONT. , 

73 TADIX-B. 

74 GCCS- M EQUIPMENT TACTICAlfMOBILE. 

75 DCGS~N , 

76 CANES. 

77 RADIAC. 

78 CANES·INTELL. 

79 GPETE. 

80 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY. 

81 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION 

82 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

--------------

34,692 29,592 

396 396 

(NTCSS) 15,703 15.703 

3,836 3,836 

7,201 7.201 

54.400 51,400 

8,548 8,548 

11,765 11.765 

6,483 6.483 

7,631 7,631 

53,644 53,644 

7,461 7,461 

9,140 9,140 

20,798 20,798 

19.754 19,754 

8,909 8,909 

13,554 13,554 

38,934 34,834 

14,131 14.131 

3.249 3,249 

11,646 11,646 

18.189 18,189 

17 ,350 17,350 

340,567 338,867 

9,835 9.835 

59,652 59,652 

6,253 6,253 

4,963 4,963 

4,664 4,664 

66,889 66,889 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT 

-5,100 

-3.000 

-4,100 

-1,700 
170 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 98 here 80986A.097

SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 

84 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION. 

86 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M .. 

SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 

87 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT. 

88 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT. 

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

89 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS. 

90 NAVY MULTI BAND TERMINAL (NMT) 

SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 

91 JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT. 

92 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS 

CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 

94 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) 

95 MID INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM. 

CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 

96 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP. 

OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 

97 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT 

23,877 

28,001 

7.856 

74,376 

27,381 

215,952 

4,463 

778 

133,530 

1.000 

12,251 

2,893 

------------ TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT 2,290,055 

AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

SON08UOYS 

99 SONOBUOYS - ALL TYPES. 179,927 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

100 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 55,279 

101 EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS. 8,792 

102 AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT. 11,364 

103 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT. 59,502 

104 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT. 19,118 

105 OTHER PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT. 1,425 

106 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT. 29,670 

107 AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES. 101,554 

108 LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT. 18,293 

109 PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS. 7,969 

110 OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 5,215 

111 AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM (ALlS) 4.827 

TOTAL, AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 502,935 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

OTY AMOUNT 

23,877 

28,001 

7,856 

74,376 

27,381 

210,620 

4.463 

778 

133,530 

1,000 

12.251 

2,893 

2,186,940 

177,327 

50,679 

4.677 

11,364 

57,502 

19,118 

1,425 

29,670 

101,554 

18.293 

7.969 

2,415 

3,427 

485,420 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-5,332 

-103,115 

-2,600 

-4,600 

-4,115 

-2,000 

-2,800 

-1,400 

-17,515 
171 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 99 here 80986A.098

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

SHrp GUN SYSTEM EQUrPMENT 

112 NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM. 

113 GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT. 

SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 

114 NATO SEASPARROW. 

115 RAM GMLS 

116 SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM 

117 AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 

118 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 

119 VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS. 

120 MARITIME INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS, 

F8M SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

121 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP 

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

122 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS 

123 SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 

124 SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 

125 ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

126 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP. 

127 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION. 

OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 

128 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM. 

129 SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS 

130 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS. 

TOTAL, ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

CTY AMOUNT 

1,188 

4,447 

58,368 

491 

51 ,858 

59,757 

71 .559 

626 

2,779 

224,484 

85,678 

3,913 

3,909 

28,694 

46.586 

11,933 

62,361 

41.813 

26.672 

787,116 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

1,188 

4.447 

58,368 

491 

51 ,858 

59,757 

71 ,559 

626 

2.779 

224,484 

85,678 

3,913 

3,909 

28,694 

46,586 

11,933 

62,361 

41,813 

26.672 

787,116 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 
172 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 100 here 80986A.099

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

131 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 

132 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS. 

133 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQurp 

134 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT. 

135 TACTICAL VEHICLES. 

136 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT. 

137 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT. 

138 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION. 

139 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

5,600 

3,717 

10,881 

14,748 

5,540 

5,741 

3,852 

25,757 

1,182 

------------ TOTAL, CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 77 ,018 

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

140 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

141 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

142 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 

143 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS. 

TOTAL, SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 

PERSONNEL AND COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

TRAINING DEVICES 

144 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

145 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

146 EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

147 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, 

149 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, 

151 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 

152 C4ISR EQUIPMENT. 

153 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, 

154 PHYSICAL SECURITY EOUIPMENT 

155 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. 

TOTAL, PERSONNEL AND COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 

157 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS. 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

TOTAL. OTHER PROCUREMENT. NAVY, 

14,250 

6,401 

5,718 

22,597 

-------_._-- 48,966 

22,527 

50,428 

2,292 

4,925 

3,202 

24,294 

4,287 

18,276 

134,495 

324,327 

589,053 

317,234 

12,140 

------------

6,310,257 

==::::==:::==::::::::::::= 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

5,600 

3,717 

10.881 

14,748 

5,540 

5.741 

3,852 

25,757 

1,182 

77 ,018 

14,250 

6,401 

5,718 

22,597 

48,966 

22,527 

50,428 

2,292 

4.925 

3,202 

24,294 

4,287 

18,276 

134 A95 

324,327 

589,053 

317,234 

12,140 

---------_ .. 6,824,824 

::::====:::=====::: 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

+514,567 
173 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 101 here 80986A.100

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

P-l Request Recommended Request 

HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED) 16,956 ·16,956 

Ahead of need -16,956 

4 SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E 19,782 16,129 -3,653 

COTS tech refresh cost growth -1,744 

Unjustifted installation funding -1,909 

OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 39,509 33,386 -6,123 

Surface inertial navigation system ECP kits growth -3,107 

Surface scalable ECDIS~N kits growth -3,016 

SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP 52,515 44,304 -8,211 

Low profile photonics mast procurement ahead of need -8,211 

10 LHAlLHD MIDLIFE 12,700 6,350 -6,350 

Excess installation funding -6,350 

11 LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE 40,329 20,079 -20,250 

Electrical improvements ahead of need -6,750 

Emergency diesel generator procurement ahead of need -13,500 

12 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 19,603 17,514 .2,089 

Support systems contract delay -2,089 

14 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 74,209 69,241 -4,968 

Infrastructure upgrade installation funding ahead of need -4,968 

17 LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 25,053 20,425 -4,628 

HW/SW obsolescence cost growth -1,140 

HM&E modification cost growth -3,488 

20 CG-MODERNIZATION 10,539 734,139 723,600 

Cruiser retention 723,600 

22 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS 36,700 31,513 -5,187 

Diver integration sensor cost growth -1,587 

Marine mammal system restructure -3,600 

23 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 119,902 108,590 -11,312 

Machinery plant upgrade installation cost growth -11,312 

28 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT 8,780 6,854 -1,926 

Recompression chamber cost growth -1,926 

29 STANDARD BOATS 36,452 33,056 ·3,396 

NSW long range support craft contract delay -1,240 

NSW short range support craft contract delay -2,156 

31 OPERATING FORCES IPE 69,368 42,368 -27,000 

Electronic technical work document support growth -3,000 

Emergent repair facility outfitting ahead of need -24,000 
174 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 102 here 80986A.101

33 LCS MODULES 45,966 38,266 ·7,700 

Mission package training equipment ·7,700 

34 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES 59,885 55,385 -4,500 

Airborne MCM support funding growth ·4,500 

36 LSD MIDLIFE 77,974 123,820 45,846 

LSD retention 50,200 

Steering control system installation cost growth ·1,450 

RO and generator installation cost growth ·1.Q48 

Canned lube oil pump installation cost growth ·1.856 

45 SSTD 11,925 8,500 ·3,425 

AN/SLQ~25X cancellation ·3,425 

49 ANISLQ,32 203,375 129,883 ·73,492 

Excess block 2 support funding ·3,684 

Block 183 instailation funding ahead of need due to 

contract delay ·2,727 

Block 2 installation funding ahead of need due to contract 

delay ·12.552 

Block 2 ship system cost growtll ·30,768 

Block 2 shore system cost growth ,6,081 

Block 3 program delay ·17,680 

50 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT 123,656 121,736 ,1,920 

SSEE increment F modification kit cost growth ·1,920 

52 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG 49,475 44,429 ·5,046 

TI/APB cost growth ·5,046 

53 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY 34,692 29,592 ·5,100 

Common array block antenna delay ·5,100 

58 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 54,400 51,400 ·3,000 

Support funding carryover -3,000 

70 10 SYSTEMS 38,934 34,834 4,100 

Support funding carryover ·4,100 

76 CANES 340,567 338,867 .1,700 

Support funding carryover ·1,700 

90 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) 215,952 210,620 ,5,332 

Support funding carryover ·1,500 

Afloat terminal excess installation funding ·3,832 

99 SONOBUOYS • ALL TYPES 179,927 177,327 ·2,600 

Support funding carryover ·2.600 

100 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 55,279 50,679 4,600 

Support funding carryover ·4,600 

101 EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS 8,792 4,677 -4,115 

Expeditionary airfield matting excess to requirement ·4.115 
175 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 103 here 80986A.102

Budget Committee Change from 

P·1 Request Recommended Request 

103 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT 59,502 57,502 ·2,000 

Support funding carryover -2,000 

110 OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 5,215 2,415 ·2,800 

Support funding carryover -2,800 

111 AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM (AUS) 4,827 3,427 .1,400 

Support funding carryover ·1,400 
176 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $1,411,411,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 1,343,511,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 1,271,311,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥72,200,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the procurement, production, and modification of equipment, supplies, materials, and spare 

parts. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
177 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 104 here 80986A.103

10 

12 

13 

PROCUREMENT, MARl NE CORPS 

WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES 

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

AAV7A1 PIP, 

LAV PIP. 

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 

EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM, 

155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER, 

HIGH MOBI LITY ARTI LLERY ROCKET SYSTEM, 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

32.360 

6,003 

589 

3,655 

5,467 

WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION. 20.354 

OTHER SUPPORT 

MODIFICATION KITS, 38,446 

WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 4.734 

TOTAL, WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES. 111,608 

GUIDED MISSILES AND EQUIPMENT 

GUIDED MISSILES 

GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE. 15,713 

JAVELIN. 219 36,175 

ANTI -ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H) 1,136 

OTHER SUPPORT 

MODIFICATION KITS, 33,976 

------------ TOTAL, GUIDED MISSILES AND EQUIPMENT. 87,000 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

32.360 

6,003 

589 

3,655 

5,467 

20,354 

38,446 

4.734 

---------_." 111,608 

15,713 

219 36,175 

1,136 

28,576 

------------ 81,600 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-5,400 

-5,400 
178 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 105 here 80986A.104

14 

15 

16 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 

COMBAT OPERATIONS CENTER 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT. 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM. 

COMMAND AND CONTROL 

ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ElEe) 

AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS. 

RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

RADAR SYSTEMS. 

RQ-21 UAS. 

INTELLICOMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM. 

INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, 

RQ-11 UAV. 

DCGS-MC. 

OTHER COMM/ElEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT, 

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

COMMON COMPUTER. RESOURCES. 

COMMAND POST SYSTEMS 

RADIO SYSTEMS. 

COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS. 

COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

16,273 

41,063 

2,930 

1,637 

18,394 

114,051 

25 66.612 

3,749 

75,979 

1,653 

9,494 

6,171 

121,955 

83,294 

74,718 

47,613 

19,573 

5,659 

------------ TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT. 710,818 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTy AMOUNT 

15,684 

40,490 

2.930 

1.637 

18,394 

101,941 

25 66,612 

3,749 

75.979 

1.653 

9,494 

6,171 

119,955 

83,294 

74,718 

47,613 

19,573 

5,659 

-----------< 

695,546 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-589 

-573 

-12,110 

-2.000 

-15,272 
179 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 106 here 80986A.105

--- - ~ -- -----

SUPPORT VEHICLES 

ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 

34 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES 

35 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES, 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

36 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP) 

37 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS .. 

40 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS, 

OTHER SUPPORT 

41 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION. 

TOTAL, SUPPORT VEHICLES. 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

42 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT, 

43 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT. 

44 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS. 

45 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED. 

46 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 

47 EOD SYSTEMS. 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

48 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT.. 

49 GARRISON MOBILE ENGR EQUIP, 

50 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP, 

51 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

CTY AMOUNT 

. --. _. ~ -_. _ .. ~-

-----------------------------

1,039 1,039 

31 ,050 31 ,050 

36,333 1,353 

3,137 3,137 

27,385 22,793 

7,016 7,016 

------------ 105,960 66,388 

14,377 14,377 

24,864 24,864 

21 ,592 21 ,592 

61 ,353 61 ,353 

4,827 4,827 

40,011 40,011 

16,809 16,809 

3,408 3,408 

48,549 36.593 

190 190 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-34,980 

-4,592 

~39,572 

-11,956 
180 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 107 here 80986A.106

GENERAL PROPERTY 

52 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT .. 

53 TRAINING DEVICES 

54 CONTAINER FAMILY 

55 FAMI LY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. 

56 RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN 

OTHER SUPPORT 

57 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION. 

TOTAL, ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT. 

58 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS. 

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS, 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

Qry AMOUNT 

23,129 

8,346 

1,857 

36.198 

2,390 

6,525 

------------ 314,425 

13.700 

1,343.511 

============ 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

ory AMOUNT 

23.129 

8,346 

1,857 

36,198 

2,390 

6,525 

302,469 

13,700 

1,271,311 

============ 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT 

-11,956 

-72.200 
181 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 108 here 80986A.107

P·1 

13 

14 

15 

20 

29 

36 

40 

50 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

MODIFICATION KITS 33,976 28,576 

Unit cost growth -5,400 

COMBAT OPERATIONS CENTER 16,273 15,684 

Program management support growth -589 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 41,063 40,490 

Unit cost growth -573 

RADAR SYSTEMS 114,051 101,941 

Previously funded EDM refurbishment -12,110 

COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES 121,955 119,955 

Unit cost growth ·2,000 

514T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP) 36,333 1,353 

Funding ahead of need -34,980 

FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS 27,385 22,793 

MTVR Tral1er restructure - funding ahead of need -4,592 

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP 48,549 36,593 

Next Generation Extended 800m Forklift schedule slip -11,956 

Change from 

Request 

·5,400 

·589 

·573 

-12,110 

·2,000 

·34,980 

-4,592 

-11,956 
182 

HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR

The Committee recognizes the continued need for the Marine 

Corps to field engineering equipment for specific missions. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Secretary of the Navy to consider procuring the High Mobility Engineer Excavator, currently 

being used by the Army, to fulfill future engineering requirements 

for the Marine Corps. 

HIGH MOBILITY MULTIPURPOSE WHEELED VEHICLE

The Committee recommendation includes a reduction of 

$34,980,000 for the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle 

Sustainment Modification Initiative. The Committee recognizes the 

importance of this program and fully supports modifying and maintaining these vehicles. However, given changes to the acquisition 

strategy, the Committee understands that the fiscal year 2014 

funds would not be obligated until the planned fiscal year 2015 low 

rate initial production contract award. Therefore, the Committee 

recommendation includes a reduction of the fiscal year 2014 funding because it is ahead of need. 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $11,774,019,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 11,398,901,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 10,860,606,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥538,295,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the procurement of aircraft, and for modification of in-service aircraft to improve safety 

and enhance operational effectiveness. It also provides for initial 

spares and other support equipment to include aerospace ground 

equipment and industrial facilities. In addition, funds are provided 

for the procurement of flight training simulators to increase combat 

readiness and to provide for more economical training. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
183 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 109 here 80986A.108

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

TACTICAL FORCES 

F-35, 

F·35 (AP·CY) 

TOTAL, COMBAT AIRCRAFT. 

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 

OTHER AIRLIFT 

C-130J 

C-130J ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)" 

HC-130J. 

HC-130J 

MC-130J, 

10 MC-130J, 

11 C-27J JOINT CARGO AIRCRAFT. 

TOTAL, AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT. 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

HELICOPTERS 

15 CV - 22 OSPREY 

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 

17 CIVIL AIR PATROL Ale 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGEi 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

19 3,060,770 

363,783 

3,424,553 

537,517 

162,000 

132,121 

88,000 

389,434 

104,000 

1,413,072 

230,798 

2,541 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

19 2,863,502 

363,783 

3,227,285 

477,517 

162,000 

122,121 

88,000 

349,434 

104,000 

--------_._. 

1,303,072 

230,798 

10,200 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-197,268 

-197,268 

·60,000 

·10,000 

-40,000 

-110,000 

+7,659 
184 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 110 here 80986A.109

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT OTy AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT 

----------------- ---------------------

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

20 TARGET DRONES, 41 138,669 41 138.669 

22 AC-130J, 470,019 420.019 -50,000 

24 RQ-4 UAV. 27.000 11,000 -16,000 

27 MQ-9 12 272,217 20 340,391 +8 +68,174 

28 RQ-4 BLOCK 40 PROC. 1.747 1.747 

TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT. 1,142,991 1,152,824 +9.833 

~10DIFICATION OF IN$ERVICE AIRCRAFT 

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 

29 B-2A, 20,019 20,019 

30 B-18, 132.222 132,222 

31 8·52, 111.002 105,882 -5,120 

32 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES 27.197 27,197 

TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 

33 A-10 47,598 47,598 

34 F-15, 354,624 339,624 ·15,000 

35 F·16. 11,794 11,794 

36 F-22A 285,830 279,730 -6,100 

37 F-35 MODIFICATIONS, 157,777 63,357 -94,420 

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 

38 C-5, 2,456 2.456 

39 C-SM, 1,021,967 983 967 -38,000 

42 C-17A. 143,197 143,197 

43 C-21 103 103 

44 C-32A. 9,780 9,780 

45 C-37A. 452 452 

46 C-130 AMP. 47,300 +47,300 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

47 GLIDER MOOS 128 128 

48 T6 6.427 6,427 

49 T-1 277 277 

50 T -38 28,686 28,686 
185 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 111 here 80986A.110

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

52 U-2 MODS. 

53 KC~10A (ATCA) 

54 C-12. 

55 MC~12W. 

56 C-20 MODS 

57 VC-25A MOD. 

58 C-40 

59 C-130 

61 C130J MODS, 

62 C-135. 

63 COMPASS CALL MODS. 

64 RC-13S. 

65 E-3. 

66 E-4 

67 E·8. 

68 H·1. 

69 H-60, 

70 RQ·4 UAV MODS. 

71 HC/MC-130 MODIFICATIONS, 

72 OTHER AIRCRAFT. 

73 MO·1 MODS. 

74 MQ-9 MODS. 

76 RQ-4 GSRAlCSRA MODS. 

77 CV-22 MODS. 

TOTAL. MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE AIRCRAFT 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

78 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS. 

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

aTY AMOUNT 

45,591 

70.918 

1,876 

5,000 

192 

263 

6,119 

58,577 

10,475 

46,556 

34,494 

171,813 

197,087 

14,304 

57,472 

6,627 

27,654 

9,313 

16,300 

6,948 

9,734 

102,970 

30,000 

23,310 

3,315,129 

463.285 

. -- - ~ ~ ... --. 463,285 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

DTY AMOUNT 

45,591 

70.918 

876 

5,000 

192 

263 

6,119 

60,077 

10,475 

46,556 

34,494 

184,313 

197,087 

14,304 

57,472 

6,627 

27,654 

9.313 

16,300 

6,948 

9,734 

97,450 

30,000 

23,310 

------------

3,211,269 

463,285 

463.285 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-1,000 

+1,500 

+12,500 

-5,520 

·103,860 
186 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 112 here 80986A.111

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT QTY AMOUNT 

---. ~ - ---- -- --- --" .. _. --------- .. , 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

79 REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP 49,140 49,140 

POS1 PRODUCTION SUPPORT 

81 B-1 3,683 3,683 

83 8-2A. 43,786 43,786 

84 8-52. 7.000 7,000 

87 C-17A. 81,952 49,952 -32,000 

89 C-135. 8,597 8,597 

90 F, 15 POST PRODUCTI ON SUPPORT 2.403 2,403 

91 F -16 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT. 3,455 3,455 

92 F-22A 5.911 5,911 

INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS. 

94 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS. 21,148 21,148 

WAR CONSUMABLES 

95 WAR CONSUMABLES. 94,947 94,947 

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 

96 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES. 1,242,004 1,137,004 -105,000 

_. - ~ ~ -~ _ .. ~. 

w •• ________ • 

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 1,564,026 1.427,026 ·137,000 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 75,845 75.845 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE, 11,398,901 10,860,606 -538,295 

======::===== ============ ===0::"'=:::::=:::::::::: 
187 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 113 here 80986A.112

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

P·1 Request Recommended Request 

F-35 3,060,770 2,863,502 ·197,268 

life-of~type buys previously funded -22,932 

Non-recurring engineering - restrain cost growth -128,000 

Engine cost growth -2,736 

Simulators cost growth -8,600 

Production engineering support growth -35,000 

C-130J 537,517 477,517 ·60,000 

Advance procurement funded in fiscal year 2013 -60,000 

HC-130J 132,121 122,121 -10,000 

Advance procurement funded in fiscal year 2013 -10,000 

MC-130J 389,434 349,434 40,000 

Advance procurement funded in fiscal year 2013 -40,000 

17 CIVIL AIR PATROL AIRCRAFT 2,541 10,200 7,659 

Program increase 7,659 

22 AC-130J 470,019 420,019 ·50,000 

Advance procurement funded in fiscal year 2013 -50,000 

24 RQ4 27,000 11,000 -16,000 

ProdUction closeout -16,000 

27 MQ·9 272,217 340,391 68,174 

Add eight aircraft 105,000 

Unit cost savings -18,000 

AS!P-2C non~recurring engineering ahead of need -18,826 

31 8·52 111,002 105,882 ·5,120 

internal Weapons Bay Upgrade defer low rate initial -5,120 

production 

34 F-15 354,624 339,624 -15,000 

Radar program management administration growth -10,000 

F-1SC/O APG~63(v)(3) radar unit cost savings -5,000 

36 F-22A MODIFICATIONS 285,830 279,730 ·6,100 

Structures Retrofit Program inductions -6.100 

37 F-35 MODIFICATIONS 157,777 63,357 ·94,420 

Siock 31 upgrades ahead of need -63,420 

Concurrency modifications -31,000 

39 C·SM 1,021,967 983,967 -38,000 

Program excess ·38,000 

46 C·130 AMP 47,300 47,300 

Only for procurement and installation of AMP kits 47,300 

54 C-12 1,876 876 ·1,000 

Low cost modifications and service bulletins -1,000 
188 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 114 here 80986A.113

Budget Committee Change from 

P·1 Request Recommended Request 

59 C·130 58,577 60,077 1,500 

CNS/ATM minimize program ·14,200 

C-130 propulsion system engine upgrades 15,700 

64 RC·135 171,813 184,313 12,500 

Baseline enhancement shortfall 12,500 

74 MQ·9 MODS 102,970 97,450 ·5,520 

Anti-ice production ahead of need ·5,520 

87 C·17A POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 81,952 49,952 ·32,000 

Training devices ahead of need ·32,000 

96 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 1,242,004 1,137,004 ·105,000 

Genera! reduction -105,000 
189 

MQ–9 REAPER

The Committee is deeply concerned by the Air Force’s course of 

action on MQ–9 Reaper production in the fiscal year 2014 budget 

request. Having previously cut MQ–9 production from an annual 

rate of 48 to 24 in the fiscal year 2013 budget request, the Air 

Force again proposes to reduce the rate to 12 in fiscal year 2014, 

which is below the minimum sustaining rate. The Air Force took 

this action despite no change in the MQ–9 fleet requirement. The 

Air Force’s proposal instead relies on an additional 12 MQ–9 aircraft authorized and appropriated in fiscal year 2013 to backfill its 

fiscal year 2014 request. This decision represents complete and brazen contradiction of congressional intent, which was to reduce the 

MQ–9 production rate in a more orderly and less disruptive manner from 48 in fiscal year 2012 to 36 in fiscal year 2013 and finally 

to a stable rate of 24 from fiscal year 2014 onward to completion. 

The Committee recommends the addition of eight MQ–9 aircraft 

to the fiscal year 2014 request with the understanding that nonDepartment of Defense purchases will help sustain the production 

line. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to procure MQ–9 aircraft funded in fiscal years 2013 and 2014 at the annual rate authorized and appropriated by the Congress. 

In addition, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force 

to submit a report to the congressional defense committees with 

the fiscal year 2015 budget request providing a detailed, locationby-location schedule for the basing of MQ–9 Reapers including, 

where appropriate, the replacement and planned disposition of 

MQ–1 Predator aircraft to be replaced by the MQ–9. The report 

shall also include the criteria by which the Air Force determines 

the order of priority for MQ–9 beddown locations and the impact 

that MQ–1/MQ–9 transition will have on existing MQ–1 flying 

training units. 

B–52 INTERNAL WEAPONS BAY UPGRADE

The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes $5,120,000 for the 

first low rate initial production lot of six units for the B–52 Internal Weapons Bay Upgrade (IWBU) project. The IWBU will provide 

internal and expanded carrying capacity for such weapon systems 

as Joint Direct Attack Munitions, the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff 

Missile, and the Miniature Air Launched Decoy, thereby increasing 

the B–52’s capability to conduct conventional strike and close air 

support missions. The IWBU effort recently underwent restructuring due to cost increases, and the Air Force now proposes to deliver IWBU capability in separate phases and increments. The Air 

Force’s budget request and future years defense plan fail to include 

necessary funding for the procurement effort beyond fiscal year 

2014 and pursuantly fails to include necessary information related 

to the program, such as the total number of units to be procured, 

the projected cost of these units, the exact phasing of quantities 

and funding, the phasing of capability to be delivered, and the year 

of completion—information that is required by Department of Defense Financial Management Regulations and necessary for congressional budget review. The Committee is supportive of the 

IWBU effort but defers funding of the first low rate initial producVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00199 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
190 

tion lot and directs the Secretary of the Air Force to include a properly scheduled, funded, phased, and justified program in its fiscal 

year 2015 budget request. 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $4,962,376,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 5,343,286,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 5,267,119,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥76,167,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the procurement, installation, and checkout of strategic ballistic and other missiles, modification of in-service missiles, and initial spares for missile systems. 

It also provides for operational space systems, boosters, payloads, 

drones, associated ground equipment, non-recurring maintenance 

of industrial facilities, machine tool modernization, and special program support. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
191 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 115 here 80986A.114

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

BALLISTIC MISSILES 

MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT· BALLISTIC 

MISSILE REPLACEMENT EO-BALLISTICOTHER MISSILES 

TACTICAL 

JASSM 

SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X) 

AMRAAM 

PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE, 

SMALL DIAMETER BOMB, 

INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

39.104 

183 291,151 

225 119,904 

199 340,015 

413 48,548 

144 42,347 

INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESSl POLLUTION PREVENTION. 752 

TOTAL, OTHER MISSI LES, 

MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE MISSILES 

CLASS IV 

MM III MODIFICATIONS 

10 AGM-650 MAVERICK, 

11 AGM-88A HARM 

12 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE. 

13 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB, 

TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE MISSILES. 

-~ -. -- --- --- 842 J17 

21 ,635 

276 

580 

6,888 

5,000 

. _ .. ~ - - _ .. --

34,379 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

39,104 

183 291,151 

225 119,904 

199 323,015 

413 48,548 

144 42,347 

752 

--------_ ... 825,717 

21,635 

276 

580 

6.888 

------------ 29,379 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

·17,000 

-17,000 

-5.000 

-5,000 
192 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 116 here 80986A.115

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

14 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS, 

OTHER SUPPORT 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

15 ADVANCED EHF. 

16 WIDEBAND GAPFI LLER SATELLITES. 

17 GPS II I SPACE SEGMENT 

18 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT (AP-CY) 

19 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) 

20 GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) 

21 DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG (SPACE) 

22 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH (SPACE) 

23 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) 

SPECIAL PROGRAMS 

29 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS 

TOTAL, OTHER SUPPORT 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 

TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

72,080 

379,586 

38,398 

403,431 

74,167 

5,244 

55,997 

95,673 

1,852,900 

583,192 

36,716 

------------ 3.525,304 

829,702 

5,343,286 

============ 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

72,080 

379,586 

38,398 

403,431 

30,000 

5,244 

55,997 

95,673 

1,842,900 

583,192 

36,716 

------------

3,471,137 

829,702 

--------_.--

5,267,119 

============ 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-44,167 

-10,000 

-54,167 

-76,167 
193 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 117 here 80986A.116

P-1 

4 

13 

18 

22 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

AMRAAM 340,015 323,015 

All-up round pricing adjustment -17,000 

SMALL DIAMETER BOMB 5,000 

BRU-61 modifications for F-35 ahead of need -5,000 

GPS III SPACE SEGMENT ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 74,187 30,000 

SV9+ ahead of need -44,167 

EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE (SPACE) 1,852,900 1,842,900 

Unjustified program management administration growth I -10,000 

fow expenditure rate 

Change from 

Request 

-17,000 

-5,000 

-44,187 

·10,000 
194 

EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE SERVICES ACQUISITION

The Committee understands that the Air Force is implementing 

a revised Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) acquisition 

strategy for launch services and that the Defense Acquisition Executive has approved an award of up to 14 launch vehicle booster 

cores over three years through competition if a new entrant becomes certified. The Committee strongly supports fair competition 

as a means of obtaining a reliable, quality product in a cost-effective way. The Committee notes that Congress has invested significant resources into satellites that are critical to national security 

interests; therefore, the Committee must have confidence in the 

proper procurement of launch services. 

The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to submit 

a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 60 

days after the enactment of this Act, which addresses the following 

issues: (1) how the Air Force will evaluate performance and reliability of the entrants, including statistical means of predicting 

performance; (2) if other contracts with the federal government directly related to launch, such as EELV launch capability or space 

station services contracts, will be considered in regard to cost or 

past performance, and, if so, how the cost of such contracts will be 

mitigated and accounted for in the procurement process; (3) if all 

entrants will be required to operate under the Federal Acquisition 

Regulation requirements, including compliance with accounting 

standards; and (4) the means by which the Air Force will assure 

openness and transparency in the process. 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $594,694,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 759,442,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 743,442,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥16,000,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the acquisition of ammunition, modifications, spares, weapons, and other ammunition-related 

items for the Air Force. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
195 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 118 here 80986A.117

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, AIR FORCE 

ROCKETS. 

CARTRIDGES. 

BOMBS 

PRACTICE BOMBS. 

GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS. 

JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION. 

FLARE, IR MJU-78 

CAD/PAD. 

EXPLOSIVE ORDINANCE DISPOSAL (EOD). 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS. 

MODIFICATIONS 

10 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000, 000 

FUZES 

11 FLARES 

13 FUZES 

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, AIR FORCE. 

WEAPONS 

14 SMALL ARMS 

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE. 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

15,735 

129,921 

30,840 

187,397 

6,965 188,510 

35,837 

7,531 

499 

480 

9,765 

55,864 

76,037 

-"------_ ... 738,416 

21,026 

-~ -- --- ----- 759,442 

:::::::::::::::::::::::= 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTy AMOUNT 

15,735 

123,921 

30,840 

187,397 

6,965 178,510 

35,837 

7,531 

499 

480 

9,765 

55,864 

76,037 

- -- --- _ ... ~. 

722,416 

21,026 

743,442 

::::=::==::=:::::== 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-6,000 

.10,000 

·16.000 

.16.000 
196 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 119 here 80986A.118

P·1 

CARTRIDGES 

PGU-23tU 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee 

Request Recommended 

129,921 123,921 

-6,000 

JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION 188,510 178,510 

Unit cost adjustment -10,000 

Change from 

Request 

·6,000 

-10,000 
197 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $17,082,508,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 16,760,581,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 16,791,497,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +30,916,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the procurement of weapon 

systems and equipment other than aircraft and missiles. Included 

are vehicles, electronic and telecommunications systems for command and control of operational forces, and ground support equipment for weapon systems and supporting structure. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
198 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 120 here 80986A.119

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT 

PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 

PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLE. 

CARGO + UTILITY VEHICLES 

FAMILY MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE. 

CAP VEHICLES. 

ITEMS LESS THAN SSM (CARGO) . 

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 

SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES. 

ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SPECIAl) 

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 

FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES. 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

ITEMS LESS THAT 55,000,000. 

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 

RUNWAY SNOW REMOVAL & CLEANING EOUIP 

10 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M, 

TOTAL, VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT, 

ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP 

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 

12 COMSEC EQUIPMENT 

13 MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC) 

INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 

14 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

15 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIP, 

16 ADVANCE TECH SENSORS. 

17 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

CTY AMOUNT 

2.048 

8,019 

946 

7,138 

13,093 

13,983 

23,794 

8.669 

6,144 

1,580 

............ 85,414 

149.661 

728 

2,789 

31 ,875 

452 

14,203 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

2,048 

8.019 

946 

7.138 

13 ,093 

13.983 

23,794 

8.669 

6,144 

1,580 

85,414 

144,452 

726 

2,789 

31 ,875 

452 

14,203 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT 

·5,209 
199 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 121 here 80986A.120

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT 

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

18 TRAFFIC CONTROL I LANDING, 46,232 46,232 

19 NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM, 11,685 11,685 

20 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM - FIXED 19.248 19,248 

21 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPRO. 19.292 10,761 -8,531 

22 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST. 17,166 17.166 

23 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL 22,723 22,723 

24 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX 27,930 27,930 

25 TAC SIGNIT SPT 217 217 

SPECIAL CONM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 

27 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 49,627 49,627 

28 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYSTEM, 13,559 63,559 +50,000 

29 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL. 11,186 11,186 

30 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM. 43,238 43,238 

31 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES 10.431 10,431 

32 C3 COUNTERMEASURES, 13.769 13 ,769 

33 GCSS·AF FOS. 19,138 19.138 

34 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYS B,809 8,809 

35 AIR OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) 26,935 26,935 

AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 

36 INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS. 80,558 80,558 

38 AFNET 97,588 97,588 

39 VOICE SYSTEMS 8,419 8,419 

40 USCENTCOM. , 34.276 34,276 

DISA PROGRAMS 

41 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PROG SPACE. 28.235 28235 

42 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE 2,061 2.061 

43 NUDET DETECTION SYS (NOS) SPACE, 4,415 4,415 

44 AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE. 30.237 30,237 

45 SPACE LIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE 98,062 98,062 

46 MILSATCOM SPACE. 105,935 105.935 

47 SPACE MODS SPACE 37,861 35,861 ,2,000 

48 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM 7,171 7,171 
200 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 122 here 80986A.121

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

60 

61 

62 

64 

65 

67 

68 

69 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

ORGANIZATION AND BASE 

TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT 

COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER lOCATER. 

RADIO EQUIPMENT. 

CCTV I AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT 

BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE. 

MODIFICATIONS 

CmlM ELECT MODS 

TOTAL, ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP 

OTHER BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIP 

PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIP 

NIGHT VISION GOGGLES. 

ITEMS LESS THAN $5, 000,000 (SAFETY) 

DEPOT PLANT + MATERIALS HANDLING EO 

MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT. 

CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT> 

MOBILITY EQUIPMENT, 

ITEMS LESS THAN $5M IBASE SUPPORT), 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

DARP RC135, 

DISTRIBUTED GROUND SYSTEMS. 

SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM 

DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROGRAM, 

TOTAL. OTHER BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIP. 

SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

CLASS I FI ED PROGRAMS 

TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE. 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

83,537 

11,884 

14,711 

10,275 

50,907 

55,701 

.. _-_ ... __ .. 

1,322,724 

14,524 

28.655 

9,332 

16,762 

33,768 

2,495 

12,859 

1,954 

24,528 

137,819 

479,586 

45,159 

-----_._---- 807,441 

25,746 

14,519,256 

w ___ • ~" _____ 

16,760,581 

=======""""=== 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

83,537 

8,634 

14,711 

10,275 

50,907 

55,701 

------_ .. _-" 1,353.734 

4,036 

28.655 

9,332 

16,762 

33,768 

1,227 

12,859 

1,954 

24,528 

137,819 

479,586 

45,159 

------------ 795.685 

25,746 

14,530,918 

16,791,497 

============ 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-3,250 

+31,010 

-10,488 

-1,268 

-11,756 

+11,662 

+30,916 
201 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 123 here 80986A.122

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

P-1 Request Recommended Request 

12 COMSEC EQUIPMENT 149,661 144,452 -5,209 

SIPRNET PKI unjustified request -5.209 

21 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 19,292 10,761 -8,531 

ANITRC-215 ahead of need -8.531 

28 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYSTEM 13,559 63,559 50,000 

Equipment for Air National Guard MQ·1!9 remote split 50.000 50,000 

operations 

47 SPACE MODS (SPACE) 37,861 35,861 -2,000 

Net-centnc project excessive growth -2,000 

50 COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR 11,884 8,634 ·3,250 

Unjustified unit cost growth for batteries -3,250 

55 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES 14,524 4,036 -10,488 

Night Vision Cueing and Display termination ·10,488 

60 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT 2,495 1,227 ·1,268 

AIr Force wide projects -1,268 

999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 14,519,256 14,530,918 11,662 

ClassIfied adjustment 11,662 
202 

MQ–1/9 REMOTE SPLIT OPERATIONS

As a result of Air Force force structure actions, six Air National 

Guard locations will transition to MQ–1/9 remote split operations 

by fiscal year 2020. To ensure that these locations are properly 

equipped for a timely and orderly transition to this new mission, 

the Committee recommendation includes an additional $50,000,000 

for the procurement of equipment associated with this mission. The 

Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to submit an execution plan for these additional funds not later than 90 days after 

the enactment of this Act. 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $4,878,985,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 4,534,083,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 4,522,990,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥11,093,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the procurement, production, and modification of equipment, supplies, materials, and spare 

parts. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
203 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 124 here 80986A.123

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT 

------------- -... _------- -----_ .. _-------- ... -~ -- --- --- ------------

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT ITEMS LESS THAN $5M. 1,291 1,291 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DeMA 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT. 5,711 5,711 

47,201 47,201 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY. 16,189 16,189 

11 TELEPORT PROGRAM 66,075 66,075 

12 ITEMS LESS THAN $SM, 83,881 83,881 

13 NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NeES) 2,572 2,572 

14 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS NETWORK. 125,557 125,557 

16 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE. 16,941 16,941 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT. DLA 

17 MAJOR EQUIPMENT. 13,137 13,137 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 

18 A ~ WEAPON SYSTEM COST. 15,414 15,414 

19 1,454 1,454 

20 EQUIPMENT 978 978 

21 OTHER CAPITAL EQUIPMENT. 5.020 5,020 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 

22 VEHICLES. 100 100 

23 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT 13,395 13,395 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MOA 

25 THAAD SYSTEM. 36 581,005 36 576,005 ·5,000 

26 AEGIS SMD. 52 580,814 52 580,814 

27 SMOS AN! TPY - 2 RADARS, 62,000 62,000 

28 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III, 131,400 131,400 

30 IRON DOME SYSTEM. 220,309 220,309 

32X GROUND BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SYSTEM (AP·CY) , 107,000 +107,000 
204 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 125 here 80986A.124

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OTY AMOUNT OTY AMOUNT DTY AMOUNT 

------------- ------------- ------------

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 

37 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) 14,363 14,363 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 

38 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, 050. 37,345 37,345 

39 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE. 16,678 16,678 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 

40 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS, . 14,792 14,792 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT ',,"5 

41 MAJOR EQUIPMENT. WHS. 35.259 35,259 

------------ TOTAL, MAJOR EQUIPMENT. 2,108.881 2,210,881 +102,000 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND 

AVIATION PROGRAMS 

43 SOF ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND $USTAINHENL 112,456 108,056 -4,400 

44 MH-60 SOF MODERNIZATION PROGRAM. 81.457 81,457 

45 NON-STANDARD AVIATION. 2,650 2,650 

46 SOF U-28. 56,208 31,208 -25,000 

47 MH~47 CHINOOK., 19,766 19,766 

48 RQ·11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE 850 850 

49 CV-22 SOF MODIFICATION, 98.927 98,927 

50 MO-l UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE. 20,576 5,122 -15.454 

51 MO-9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE. 1,893 1.893 

53 STUASLO 13,166 13,166 

54 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE, 107,687 65,187 -42,500 

55 AC/MC-130J 51 ,870 51 .870 

57 C-130 MODIFICATIONS. 71 ,940 61 ,317 -10,623 

SHIPBUILDING 

59 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS 37,439 37.439 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

61 SOF ORDNANCE ITEMS UNDER $5, 000,000, 159,029 159,029 
205 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 126 here 80986A.125

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

69 SOF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS 

71 DCGS-SOF 

OTHER ITEMS UNDER $5,000,000, 

74 SOF COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS. 

72 SPECIAL PROGRAMS. 

73 TACTICAL VEHICLES. 

74 WARRIOR SYSTEMS UNDER $5,000,000 

76 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS. 

81 SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES, 

82 SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE. 

87 SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS. 

TOTAL, SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND. 

CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE 

89 INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION. 

90 INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION < 

92 JOINT BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM, 

93 COLLECTIVE PROTECTION. 

94 CONT AM INA TION AVOI DANCE. 

TOTAL. CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE. 

TOTAL, CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE, 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

TOTAL. PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

79,819 

14,906 

81,711 

35,053 

41,526 

43,353 

210,540 

20,000 

6,645 

25,581 

191.061 

1,586,109 

14.,271 

101,667 

13,447 

20,896 

144.540 

294.821 

544,272 

------------ 4,534,083 

=;;:"'========= 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

79,819 

14,906 

77,067 

33,897 

41,526 

43,353 

208.094 

20,000 

6,645 

25,581 

191,061 

1,479,886 

14,271 

101,667 

13,447 

20,896 

144.540 

294,821 

537,402 

4,522,990 

==""========'" 

CHANGE FROM 

REaUEST 

ary AMOUNT 

-4,644 

-1,156 

-2,446 

-106,223 

-6,870 

-11,093 
206 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 127 here 80986A.126

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

P-1 Request Recommended Request 

25 THAAD SYSTEM 581,005 576,005 -5,000 

Training excess to requirement -5.000 

GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SYSTEM 

32X ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 107,000 107,000 

Advance procurement of 14 GBls 107,000 

43 SOF ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT 112,456 108,056 -4,400 

Silent Knight TFfTA radar - early to need -4.400 

46 SOF U-28 56,208 31,208 -25,000 

HD full motion video - excess to need -25,000 

50 MQ-1 UAV 20,576 5,122 -15,454 

HD full motion video - excess to need -15,454 

54 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE 107,687 65,187 -42,500 

Large caliber gun - early to need -42,500 

57 C-130 MODIFICATIONS 71,940 61,317 -10,623 

C-130 TFtT A - early to need -10,623 

68 SOF OTHER ITEMS UNDER $5M 81,711 77,067 -4,644 

Coalition Global Network - unjustified growth -4,644 

69 SOF COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS 35,053 33,897 -1,156 

Transfer to ROTE, OW line 271 -1.156 

74 SOF WARRIOR SYSTEMS UNDER $SM 210,540 208,094 -2,446 

SpecIal Communications Enterprise Program - early to 

need -2,446 

999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 544,272 537,402 -6,870 

Classified adjustment -6,870 
207 

DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $223,531,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 25,135,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 75,135,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +50,000,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommendation shall be distributed as follows: 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommended 

Change from 

request 

NEXT GENERATION STAR TRACKER SYSTEM ........................................................... 4,180 4,180 – – – 

READ OUT INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FOUNDRY IMPROVEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY 2,200 2,200 – – – 

SPACE QUALIFIED SOLAR CELL SUPPLY CHAIN ...................................................... 920 920 – – – 

CRITICAL SPACE INDUSTRIAL BASE INVESTMENT ................................................... 7,200 7,200 – – – 

ADVANCED STRUCTURAL MATERIALS ...................................................................... 5,209 5,209 – – – 

ELECTRONIC MATERIALS AND DEVICE PRODUCTION .............................................. 5,426 5,426 – – – 

PROGRAM INCREASE ............................................................................................... 50,000 50,000 

TOTAL, DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT ...................................................... 25,135 75,135 50,000 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(209) 

TITLE IV 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION 

The fiscal year 2014 Department of Defense research, development, test and evaluation budget request totals $67,520,236,000. 

The Committee recommendation provides $66,409,530,000 for the 

research, development, test and evaluation accounts. The table 

below summarizes the Committee recommendations: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
210 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0128 80986A.127

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

RECAPITULATION 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, ARMY, 7,989,102 7,961 ,486 -27,616 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, NAVY, 15,974 780 15 368,352 -606 428 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, AIR FORCE, 25,702,946 24 947,354 - 755 592 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, 

DEFENSE -WIDE, 17,667,108 17,885,538 +218,430 

OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE, 186,300 246 800 +60,500 

GRAND TOTAL, RDT&E, 67,520,236 66 409 530 -1 ,110,706 
211 

SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS

Items for which additional funds have been provided as shown in 

the project level tables or in paragraphs using the phrase ‘‘only for’’ 

or ‘‘only to’’ in this report are congressional interest items for the 

purpose of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of 

these items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated 

amount specifically addressed in the committee report. These items 

remain special interest items whether or not they are repeated in 

a subsequent conference report. 

REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR ACQUISITION ACCOUNTS

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to continue to 

follow the reprogramming guidance as specified in the report accompanying the House version of the fiscal year 2008 Department 

of Defense Appropriations bill (House Report 110–279). Specifically, 

the dollar threshold for reprogramming funds will remain at 

$20,000,000 for procurement and $10,000,000 for research, development, test and evaluation. 

The Secretary shall continue to follow the limitation that prior 

approval reprogrammings are set at either the specified dollar 

threshold or 20 percent of the procurement or research, development, test and evaluation line, whichever is less. These thresholds 

are cumulative from the base for reprogramming value as modified 

by any adjustments. Therefore, if the combined value of transfers 

into or out of a procurement (P–1) or research, development, test 

and evaluation (R–1) line exceeds the identified threshold, the Secretary of Defense must submit a prior approval reprogramming to 

the congressional defense committees. In addition, guidelines on 

the application of prior approval reprogramming procedures for 

congressional special interest items are established elsewhere in 

this report. 

REPROGRAMMING REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) to continue to provide the congressional defense committees 

quarterly, spreadsheet-based DD Form 1416 reports for Service 

and defense-wide accounts in titles III and IV of this Act as required in the explanatory statement accompanying the Department 

of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006. 

FUNDING INCREASES

The Committee directs that the funding increases outlined in 

these tables shall be provided only for the specific purposes indicated in the tables. 

CLASSIFIED ANNEX

Adjustments to the classified programs are addressed in a classified annex accompanying this report. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
212 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $8,676,627,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 7,989,102,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 7,961,486,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥27,616,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the research, development, 

test and evaluation activities of the Department of the Army. The 

total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following 

program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
213 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0129 80986A.128

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY 

BASIC RESEARCH 

IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH, 

DEFENSE RESEARCH SCI ENCES, 

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES,. 

UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS. 

TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH. 

APPLI ED RESEARCH 

MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY. 

SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY, 

TRACTOR HIP. 

AVIATION TECHNOLOGY, 

ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY. 

10 MISSILE TECHNOLOGY. 

11 ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY. 

12 ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION. 

13 COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY. 

14 BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY. 

15 CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY .. 

16 JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM. 

17 WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY .. 

18 ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES 

19 NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY. 

20 COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS. 

21 HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY .. 

22 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY .. 

23 COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY. 

24 COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, . 

25 MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY. 

26 MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY. 

27 WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY. 

28 MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY. 

TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

21,803 21,803 

221,901 221,901 

79,359 79,359 

113,662 113,662 

436,725 436,725 

26,585 26,585 

43,170 43.170 

36,293 36,293 

55,615 55.615 

17 585 17 585 

51 ,528 61,528 +10,000 

26,162 26,162 

24,063 24,063 

64,589 64 589 

68,300 68,300 

4,490 490 

7,818 818 

37,798 52 798 +15 000 

59,021 59 021 

43,426 43 426 

20,574 20 574 

21,339 21.339 

20, 316 20,316 

34,209 34,209 

10,439 10,439 

70,064 70,064 

17,654 17 654 

31 ,546 31 ,546 

93,340 93 340 

885,924 910,924 +25,000 
214 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0130 80986A.129

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

29 WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 56,056 56,056 

30 MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 62,032 93,032 +31,000 

31 AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 81.080 81,080 

32 WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .. 63,919 73.919 +10,000 

33 COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .. 97,043 107.043 +10.000 

34 COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 5.866 5,866 

35 MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .. 7,800 7,800 

36 ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 40,416 40.416 

37 TRACTOR HIKE. 9.166 9,166 

38 NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS. 13 627 13,627 

39 TRACTOR ROSE. 10 667 10,667 

40 MILITARY HIV RESEARCH. 

41 COMBATING TERRORISM. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 15,054 15,054 

42 TRACTOR NAIL. 3.194 3,194 

43 TRACTOR EGGS. 2,367 2.367 

44 ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY .. 25,348 25,348 

45 MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 64.009 72 009 +8 000 

46 TRACTOR CAGE. 11 ,083 11 .083 

47 HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM. 180,662 180 662 

48 LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 22.806 22 806 

49 JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM .. 5,030 5,030 

50 NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 36.407 46,407 +10,000 

51 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS. 11,745 11 ,745 

52 MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 23,717 23 717 

53 ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE & SENSOR TECHNOLOGY 33,012 33.012 

TOTAL. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 882.106 951,106 +69,000 
215 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0131 80986A.130

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 

54 ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION. 15,301 15,301 

55 ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION (SPACE). 13,592 13 592 

56 LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER· ADV DEV, 10,625 ·10,625 

57 SMOKE, OBSCURANT AND TARGET DEFEATING SYS·ADV DEV, 

58 TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION, , 30,612 30 612 

59 ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS),., 49,989 49,989 

60 SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY. , 6,703 6,703 

61 TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM· AD,. 6,894 6,894 

62 NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT, 9,066 9,066 

63 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2,633 2,633 

64 WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK· TACTICAL, 272,384 235,384 ·37 000 

65 NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, , 3,874 3,874 

66 AVIATION· ADV DEV, 5,018 5,018 

67 LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT· ADV DEV, 11,556 11,556 

69 MEDICAL SYSTEMS ADV DEV, . 15,603 15 603 

70 SOLDIER SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT, 14,159 14,159 

71 INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE, 79 79 

72 TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES" 55,605 55 605 

74 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2·INTERC 79 232 79,232 

75 INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE, 476 4,476 

76 ENDURANCE UAVS, 28,991 ·28,991 

TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION, 636,392 559,776 ·76,616 
216 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0132 80986A.131

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 

77 AIRCRAFT AVIONICS, 76 5B8 76 588 

78 ARMED, DEPLOYABLE OH-58D, 73,309 73,309 

79 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT, 154,621 154 621 

BO JOINT TACTICAL RADIO, 31 ,B26 31,826 

81 MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO, 23 341 23,341 

82 ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM, 4,839 4,839 

83 TRACTOR CAGE, 23,841 23 841 

84 INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS, 79,855 79,855 

85 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES, 2, 140 2,140 

86 JAVELIN, 002 002 

87 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES, 21,321 21 ,321 

88 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, 514 514 

93 NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS - SDD, 43,405 43 405 

94 COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT, ' 1,939 ,939 

95 NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES - SDD, 18,980 18 980 

97 AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE -SDD, 18,294 18 294 

98 CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, 17 013 17,013 

99 AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT, 701 6,701 

100 DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS) SOD, 14 575 14 575 

101 COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE, 27,634 27 634 

102 BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION, ' 193 748 193 748 

103 WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS - SDD, 15 721 15,721 
217 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0133 80986A.132

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

104 LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT - SDD. 

105 COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS - SDD. 

106 MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT. 

107 LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER - SOD. 

108 ARTI LLERY MUNITIONS. 

109 ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE. 

110 RADAR DEVELOPMENT. 

111 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS), 

112 FIREFINDER. 

113 SOLDIER SYSTEMS WARRIOR OEM/VAL. 

114 ARTILLERY SYSTEMS. 

117 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 

118 ARMY INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEM (A-IMH 

119 ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE. 

120 JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER., 

121 AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSSTEM, 

122 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 

124 PAC-2/MSE MISSILE. 

125 ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AlAMO). 

126 MANNED GROUND VEHICLE, 

127 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR, 

128 NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION. 

129 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE ENG AND MANUFACTURING. 

130 TROJAN - RH12. 

131 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT. 

TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT .. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

41,703 41,703 

7,379 7,379 

39,46B 39,468 

92 285 92,285 

8,209 8,209 

22,958 22 958 

1,549 .549 

17,342 17 342 

47.221 47 221 

48,477 48 477 

80,613 80,613 

68,814 68 814 

137,290 137 290 

116,298 86,298 -30,000 

68,148 68,148 

33,219 33,219 

15,127 15,127 

68.843 68.843 

364,649 364,649 

592,201 592,201 

10.382 10,382 

21,143 21,143 

84,230 84,230 

3,465 3,465 

10,806 10,806 

2.857,026 2,827,026 -30,000 
218 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0134 80986A.133

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMM I TTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

132 THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT. 16 934 16,934 

133 TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 13 488 13,488 

134 MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 46 672 46 672 

135 RAND ARROYO CENTER. 11 ,919 11 ,919 

136 ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL. , 193 658 193 658 

137 CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM. 37,158 37 158 

139 ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES. 340,659 340,659 

140 ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS. 66,061 66,061 

141 SURVIVABILITY I LETHALITY ANALYSIS .. 43,280 43,280 

143 AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION. 6,025 6,025 

144 METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES. 7,349 7,349 

145 MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS. 19,809 19,809 

146 EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS. 5,941 5,941 

147 SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING. 55,504 55,504 

148 ARMY EVALUATION CENTER. 65,274 65 274 

149 SIMULATION & MODELING FOR ACQ, RQTS, & TNG (SMART) 1,283 1.283 

150 PROGRAMWlDE ACTIVITIES,. 82,035 82,035 

151 TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES. 33,853 33,853 

152 MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY. 53,340 53 340 

153 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT 5,193 5,193 

154 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT). 54,175 54,175 

_.---------- ------------ ----.-------

TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT. 1,159,610 1,159,610 
219 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0135 80986A.134

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

156 MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. 

157 LOGISTICS AUTOtIATION .. 

159 PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT. 

160 AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE .. 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

161 ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM. 

162 COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS. 

163 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM. 

164 AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS. 

165 AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 

166 DIGITlZATlON 

167 NETWORK INTEGRATED EVALUATION (NIE) .. 

168 MISSILE/ AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM .. 

169 OTHER MISSI LE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS .. 

171 TRACTOR CARD. 

JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM. 

173 SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. 

174 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM. 

176 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM. 

177 SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE). 

178 WWMCCSIGLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM. 

179 TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES .. 

180 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND ISURFACE SYSTEMS .. 

182 MQ·1 SKY WARRIOR A UAV. 

183 RQ·11 UAV. 

184 RQ- 7 UAV. 

186 BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE .. 

187 END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREONESS ACTIVITIES. 

TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 

TOTAL, RESEARCH. DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY, 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

110 576 110 576 

717 717 

70 053 70,053 

98.450 83,450 -15 000 

30,940 30,940 

177,532 177,532 

36,495 36 495 

257, 187 257, 187 

315 315 

6,186 6, 186 

1,578 ,578 

62,100 62,100 

18,778 18 778 

7,108 108 

7,600 7,600 

9, 357 9,357 

41 ,225 41.225 

18, 197 18, 197 

14 215 14 215 

33 533 33,533 

27,622 27 622 

10,901 10 901 

2,321 2,321 

12,031 12 031 

12 449 12 449 

56 136 56,136 

~ . ---- - - -- - ------------ .126,602 1,111,602 ·15,000 

4,717 4,717 

7,989,102 7,961,486 ·27,616 
220 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0136 80986A.135

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL TABLES 

[In thousands of dollars) 

Budget Committee Change from 

R-l Request Recommended Request 

10 MISSILE TECHNOLOGY 51,528 61,528 10,000 

Program increase 10,000 

17 WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY 37,798 52,798 15,000 

Program increase 15.000 

30 MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 62,032 93,032 31,000 

Peer-reviewed neurotoxin exposure treatment Parklnsons 

research program 16,000 

Peer-reviewed neurofibromatosis research program 15.000 

WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED 

32 TECHNOLOGY 63,919 73,919 10,000 

Program jncrease 10,000 

COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED 

33 TECHNOLOGY 97,043 107,043 10,000 

Alternative energy research 10,000 

45 MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 64,009 72,009 8,000 

Program increase 8,000 

50 NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 36,407 46,407 10,000 

Program increase 10,000 

56 LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER - ADV DEV 10,625 ·10,625 

Program deferred to fiscal year 2019 -10,625 

64 WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-TACTICAL 272,384 235,384 ·37,000 

Excess program growth -37,000 

76 ENDURANCE UAVS 28,991 ·28,991 

Program termination -28,991 

119 ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE 116,298 86,298 ·30,000 

Schedule slip ·30,000 

160 AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE 98,450 83,450 ·15,000 

Funding ahead of need -15,000 
221 

MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY

The budget request includes $53,340,000 in the Munitions Standardization Effectiveness and Safety line. The Committee recommendation fully funds the request. The Committee is aware that 

multiple programs and projects are funded in this program element, including research and development of energetics technologies. The Committee recognizes the benefits of these technologies to the warfighter by creating munitions with greater performance and precision while also reducing adverse environmental 

impacts. The Committee commends the Army for its continuing 

work in energetics technology and strongly encourages that funding 

available in this line be allocated for research in energetics technologies. 

WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY

The budget request includes $37,798,000 for the Weapons and 

Munitions Technology line. The Committee recommendation includes $52,798,000, an increase of $15,000,000 above the budget request. Under this program element, the Army invests in future 

technologies while seeking to spiral new technologies to 

warfighters, including light armament, multi-purpose munitions, 

specialty explosives and warheads, insensitive munitions, fire control sensors, and seekers for enemy neutralization. The Committee 

notes that the program funding will support a dedicated effort to 

mature and update prototypes and deliver armament and munitions technologies that will enhance lethality and survivability, as 

well as expanded manufacturing technologies for explosives and 

dual-use. 

WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY

The budget request includes $63,919,000 for the Weapons and 

Munitions Advanced Technology line. The Committee recommendation provides $73,919,000, an increase of $10,000,000 above the 

budget request, to support the demonstration of advanced lethal 

and non-lethal weapons and munitions technologies to increase battlefield lethality and security. The program supports the maturation and demonstration of enabling components and subsystems 

which provide scalable lethal and non-lethal effects, key subsystems that enable an electromagnetic gun weapons system demonstrator, and a tactical high energy laser weapons system demonstrator. 

WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK—TACTICAL

The budget request includes $272,384,000 for the continued development of Increment 3 of the Warfighter Information Network— 

Tactical (WIN—T). The Committee recommendation is 

$235,384,000, a decrease of $37,000,000 below the budget request. 

The Committee recommendation will support the Increment 3 effort and maintain the necessary pace in the overall WIN–T program. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
222 

MALARIA VACCINE DEVELOPMENT

The Committee recognizes the importance of finding a vaccine for 

preventing malaria and commends the Secretary of the Army for 

continuing to fund this significant research. A malaria vaccine will 

reduce or eliminate the need for anti-malarial drugs and will protect warfighters in austere, malaria-prone environments. Therefore, 

the Committee fully funds the request for $9,600,000 for vaccines 

for the prevention of malaria. 

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER

The Committee supports the funding included in the budget request for the Systems Engineering Research Center, a national resource that is a university affiliated research center. It is comprised of 23 collaborating universities, and provides a broad base 

of talent to conduct vital systems research. By doing so, it helps enhance the Department of Defense’s capability for the successful development, integration, testing, and sustainability of completed defense systems, services, and enterprises. 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $16,963,398,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 15,974,780,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 15,368,352,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥606,428,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the research, development, 

test and evaluation activities of the Department of the Navy, which 

includes the Marine Corps. The total amount recommended in the 

bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
223 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0137 80986A.136

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMM ITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 

BASIC RESEARCH 

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES. 112,617 112,617 

IN·HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH. 18.230 18 230 

DEFENSE RESEARCH SCI ENCES. 484,459 484 459 

TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH. 615,306 615,306 

APPLI ED RESEARCH 

POWER PROJECTION APPLI ED RESEARCH. 104,513 104,513 

FORCE PROTECTION APPLI ED RESEARCH. 145,307 145,307 

MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY. 47,334 47,334 

COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH. 34,163 34,163 

WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLI ED RESEARCH. 49,689 49 689 

ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH .. 97,701 97,701 

10 OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH. 45,685 60,685 +15 000 

11 JO I NT NON· LETHAL WEAPONS APPLI ED RESEARCH 6,060 6,060 

12 UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLI ED RESEARCH. 103 050 103,050 

13 FUTURE NAVAL CAPABI L1T1ES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEV. 169 710 169 710 

14 MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH. 31 ,326 31.326 

.----------- ------------ ------------ TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH 834,538 849,538 +15,000 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

15 POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 48,201 48,201 

16 FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 28 328 28, 328 

19 ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, 56, 179 56, 179 

20 MARINE CORPS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD),. 132 4DO 132 400 

21 JOINT NON· LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 11 ,854 11 ,854 

22 FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEV. 247 931 252 931 +5 000 

23 WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 4,760 40,460 +35, 700 

25 NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS. 51,463 51,463 

26 MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 2,000 2,000 

---------.-- -.--.-------

TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 583,116 623,816 +40,700 
224 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0138 80986A.137

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 

27 AIRIOCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS. 42 246 39 246 -3 000 

28 AVIATION SURVIVABILITY. 591 591 

29 DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL. 3,262 ,262 

30 AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS. 74 15,074 +15,000 

31 ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 964 6,964 -1,000 

32 TACTICAL AIRBDRNE RECONNAISSANCE. 5,257 5,257 

33 ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY. 1,570 1,570 

34 SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES. 168,040 145,653 -22,387 

35 SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE 88,649 75.649 ·13,000 

36 CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 83,902 80,902 -3,000 

37 PILOT FISH. 108 713 108,713 

38 RETRACT LARCH. 316 9,316 

39 RETRACT JUNIPER. 77,108 77,108 

40 RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL. 762 762 

41 SURFACE ASW. 2,349 2,349 

42 ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT. 852,977 850,182 -2,795 

43 SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS. 8,764 764 

44 SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN. 20,501 15.156 -5 345 

45 SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES. 27,052 22.052 ·5,000 

46 ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS. 428.933 428.933 

47 ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS .. 27,154 18,144 ·9.010 

48 CHALK EAGLE. 519,140 519,140 

49 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS). 406,389 382 031 -24 358 

50 COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION. 36,570 4,963 -31.607 

51 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS. 8,404 8,404 

52 MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES. 136,967 122,967 -14 000 

53 MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM. 1,4B9 1,489 
225 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0139 80986A.138

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

54 JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT, 38,422 35,023 -3, 399 

55 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT, 69,312 53,643 -15,669 

56 OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, 9,196 9,196 

57 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, , ' 18,850 18,850 

58 NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM, 45,618 29,636 -15,982 

59 FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT" 019 3,019 

60 CHALK CORAL, 144 951 144 951 

61 NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY, 5,797 847 -1,950 

62 RETRACT MAPLE" 308 131 308 131 

63 LINK PLUMERIA, 195, 189 195, 189 

64 RETRACT ELM, 56,358 56,358 

65 LINK EVERGREEN, 55,378 55,378 

66 SPECIAL PROCESSES, 48,842 48,842 

67 NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 7,509 509 

68 LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY, 075 -5,075 

69 NONLETHAL WEAPONS, 51 ,178 49,278 -1,900 

70 JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS" 205,615 168,178 -37,437 

72 TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES, 37,227 33,906 -3,321 

73 ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION" 169 169 

74 JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED lED ELECTRONIC WARFARE, 20,874 10,874 -10,000 

75 PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, 2, 257 2,257 

76 SPACE & ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINE, 38, 327 31,327 -7,000 

77 OFFENSIVE ANT! -SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT, , 135,985 48,985 -87,000 

78 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE ENGINEERING/MANUFACTURING 50 362 49,062 -1,300 

79 ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT - MIP, 448 4,908 -3,540 

80 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT HIP, 153 153 

- ~ ~ -- ~ ------ -._---------

TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION, 4,641,385 4,328,310 -313,075 
226 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0140 80986A.139

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 

81 OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT. 40,558 33.671 -6 887 

82 AV-88 AIRCRAFT - ENG DEV. 35,825 33,325 -2 500 

83 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT. 99,891 68,530 -31,361 

84 MULTI -MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT .. 17,565 17,565 

85 AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING. 4,026 4.026 

86 P-3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM. 1,791 1.791 

87 WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM. 11.725 8,523 -3,202 

88 TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM ... 68,463 63,463 -5,000 

89 ADVANCED HAWKEYE. 152,041 147,041 -5,000 

90 H-1 UPGRADES, 47,123 47,123 

91 ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS, 30 208 29,208 -1,000 

92 V-22A, 43,084 43 084 

93 AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 11,401 901 -4 500 

94 EA-18 .. 11,138 11,138 

95 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT, 34,964 34,964 

96 VH-71 A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT. 94.238 83,609 -10,629 

97 NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) 257 796 157 937 -99,859 

98 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM NAVY (JTRS-NAVY)., 3,302 3,302 

99 SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING. 240,298 320 298 +80,000 

100 LPD-17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION. 1.214 .214 

101 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SOB), 46,007 37,925 -8,082 

102 STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS. 75 592 58 592 -17,000 

103 AIR80RNE MeM. 117 854 105 264 ~12 590 

104 MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE ELECTRONIC WARFARE 10,080 10 080 

105 NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL-COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENG. 21.413 21.413 

106 FUTURE UNMANNED CARRIER-BASED STRIKE SYSTEM. 146 683 96 887 -49,796 

107 ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS, 275 871 193,071 -82,800 

108 SSN-688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION .. 89,672 85,735 -3,937 

109 AIR CONTROL. 13,754 1 ° ,754 -3,000 

110 SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS, 69,615 69.615 

112 NEW DESIGN SSN. 121,566 131,566 +10 000 

113 SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM. 49,143 49,143 

114 SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/LIVE FIRE T&E. 155,254 137 421 -17,833 

115 NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES. 3,689 3,689 
227 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0141 80986A.140

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

116 MINE DEVELOPMENT. 

117 LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT. 

118 JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT. 

119 PERSONNEL. TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS. 

120 JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS. 

121 SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL). 

122 SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL). 

123 SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE' SOFT KILlIEW). 

124 INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING. 

125 MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT. 

126 NAVIGATION I ID SYSTEM. 

127 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) - EMD. 

128 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF). 

129 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 

130 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 

132 CH-53K. 

133 JOINT AIR- TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM). 

134 MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA). 

135 DDG-1000. 

136 TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM - MIP. 

137 TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS. 

138 SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM .. 

TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

5,041 5.041 

26,444 36,444 +10.000 

897 8,897 

233 6,233 

442 442 

130,360 111,360 -19,000 

50 209 43 309 -6,900 

164,799 114,799 -50.000 

1,984 1.984 

9,458 28 458 +19,000 

51,430 47 430 -4,000 

512,631 497 727 -14.904 

534,187 522,745 "11,442 

5,564 5,564 

69,659 62,823 -6,836 

503,180 494,180 -9,000 

5,500 -5,500 

317,358 302,358 -15,000 

187.910 187,910 

2,140 2.140 

9,406 406 

22,800 22,800 

5,028,476 4,639,918 -388,558 
228 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0142 80986A.141

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

139 THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT. 

140 TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 

141 MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT. 

142 JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION. 

143 STUDI ES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT - NAVY. 

144 CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES. 

146 TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES. 

147 MANAGEMENT. TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT. 

148 STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT. 

149 RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT. 

150 RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT. 

151 TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT. 

152 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY. 

153 NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT. 

154 SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT. 

155 MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT. 

156 TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES .. 

TOTAL. RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT. 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

159 HARPOON MODIFICATIONS. 

160 UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT. 

162 MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS. 

163 CARR I ER ON BOARD DELIVERY FOLLOW ON. 

164 STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT. 

165 STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT. 

166 SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM. 

167 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT. 

168 NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS. 

169 RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT). 

170 F / A -18 SQUADRONS. 

171 E-2 SQUADRONS. 

172 FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL). 

173 SURFACE SUPPORT. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

43,261 43,261 

71,872 71.872 

38,033 38,033 

1,352 1.352 

5,566 5,566 

48.345 48,345 

637 637 

76,585 76.585 

3,221 3,221 

72,725 72 725 

141,778 141 ,778 

331,219 331,219 

16,565 16,565 

3,265 3,265 

7,134 7,134 

24,082 24,082 

497 497 

------------ -----~ . --- -- 886,137 886,137 

699 699 

20,961 20,961 

35 35 

460 ,230 -1,230 

757 757 

98 057 98 057 

31 ,768 31,768 

.464 ,464 

21 ,729 21 .729 

13 561 8,561 -5,000 

131,118 124 618 -6,500 

1,971 .971 

46,155 23.439 -22,716 

2,374 2.374 
229 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0143 80986A.142

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST ~ * __ ~ ________ M H~_~~_" _____ ~~ •• W' 

174 TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC). 12,407 12,407 

175 INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM. 41,609 41,609 

176 AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS. 7, 240 6,940 -300 

177 GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR. 78,208 75,208 -3,000 

178 CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 45,124 39, 124 -6,000 

179 CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT. 2,703 703 

180 ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT. 19,563 19,563 

181 HARM IMPROVEMENT.. 13,586 13,586 

182 TACTICAL DATA LINKS. 197,538 189,886 ·7,652 

183 SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION. 31,863 31,863 

184 MK-48 ADCAP. 12,806 12,806 

185 AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS. 88,607 78,608 -9,999 

187 OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS. 116,928 116,928 

188 MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS .. 178,753 177 . 153 -1,600 

189 MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS. 139,594 113 814 -25,780 

190 MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT. 42,647 37,034 -5,613 

191 USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP). 34,394 33,394 -1 ,000 

192 TACTICAL AIM MISSILES. 39,159 15,453 -23,706 

193 ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) 2,613 2.613 

194 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV). 986 986 

199 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) .. 66 231 66 231 

200 CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES. 24 476 24,476 

201 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM. 23,531 23,531 

206 NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (METOe). 742 742 

207 JOINT MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS. 4,804 804 

208 TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES .. 8.381 8,381 
230 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0144 80986A.143

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

211 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/SURFACE SYSTEMS. 

212 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/SURFACE SYSTEMS .. 

213 RQ-4 UAV. 

214 MQ-8 UAV. 

215 RQ-11 UAV. 

216 RQ-7 UAV .. 

217 SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASLO). 

219 RQ·21A. 

220 MULTI· INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT .. 

221 MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT. 

222 DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF). 

223 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS. 

224 MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH). 

TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .. 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 

TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

5,535 5,535 

19,718 15,718 -4,000 

375,235 375 235 

48,713 12 523 -36,190 

102 102 

710 710 

013 5,013 

11,122 11,122 

28,851 28,851 

5,116 5,116 

28 042 28 042 

50 933 50,933 

998 4,998 

2,200,690 040,404 -160,286 

1,185,132 1,384,923 +199,791 

15,974,780 15,368,352 ·606,428 
231 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0145 80986A.144

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

(In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

R-1 Request Recommended Request 

OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED 

10 RESEARCH 45,685 60,685 15,000 

Program increase - AGOR mid-life refit 15,000 

FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED 

22 TECHNOLOGY DEV 247,931 252,931 5,000 

Program increase - ASW research 5,000 

23 WAR FIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 4,760 40,460 35,700 

Program increase - bone marrow registry program 31,500 

Program increase - tactical athlete program 4,200 

27 AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS 42,246 39,246 -3,000 

Precision time and astrometry program excess growth -3,000 

30 AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 74 15,074 15,000 

Program increase 15,000 

31 ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 7,964 6,964 -1,000 

Excess government engineering support -1,000 

SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE 

34 COUNTERMEASURES 168,040 145,653 ·22,387 

Unmanned surface vehicle milestone slip -4,000 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for large displacement 

unmanned undersea vehicle -18,387 

35 SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE 88,649 75,649 -13,000 

Countermeasure anti-torpedo program delay -10,000 

Combat rapid attack weapon unfunded out year requirement -3,000 

36 CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 83,902 80,902 -3,000 

Unjustified classified effort -3,000 

42 ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 852,977 850,182 -2,795 

Test and evaluation support funding ahead of need -2,795 

44 SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN 20,501 15,156 -5,345 

Program execution -5,345 

45 SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES 27,Q52 22,052 -5,000 

LX(R) program growth -5,000 

47 ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS 27,154 18,144 -9,010 

Program execution -9,010 

49 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) 406,389 382,031 ·24,358 

Program increase ~ small business technology insertion 10,000 

Program execution for project 3096 -34,358 

50 COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 36,570 4,963 ·31,607 

Warfare systems certification effort forward financed -5,042 

Late level of effort contract awards for project 0164 -18,040 

Late level of effort contract awards for project 3312 -8,525 
232 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0146 80986A.145

Budget Committee Change from 

R-1 Request Recommended Request 

52 MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES 136,967 122,967 -14,000 

Program delay -14,000 

JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 

54 DEVELOPMENT 38,422 35,023 -3,399 

Program execution for project 0377 -3,399 

55 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT 69,312 53,643 -15,669 

Air and missile defense radar integration -2,750 

E N 2C backfit -5,419 

Test and evaluation support growth -2,200 

Common array block antenna contract delay -5,300 

58 NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM 45,618 29,636 -15,982 

Aircraft energy conservation program growth -5,000 

Program execution -10,982 

61 NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY 5,797 3,847 -1,950 

Navy Pal payment system unjustified request -1,950 

68 LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY 5,075 -5,075 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for advanced minor 

caliber gun -5,075 

69 NONLETHAL WEAPONS 51,178 49,278 -1,900 

Program management growth -1,900 

70 JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS 205,615 168,178 -37,437 

JPALS 1 B lead platform integration delay -20,000 

JPALS 18 follow-on platform integration delay -10,000 

JPALS increment 2 test and evaluation ahead of need -7,437 

TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED 

72 COUNTERMEASURES 37,227 33,906 -3,321 

Fisca! year 2013 delayed new start for common infrared 

countermeasure -3,321 

JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED lED 

74 ELECTRONIC WARFARE 20,874 10,874 -10,000 

Milestone C delay -10,000 

SPACE & ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) 

76 ARCHITECTURE/ENGINE 38,327 31,327 -7,000 

eNO rapid innovation cell program growth -7,000 

OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON 

77 DEVELOPMENT 135,985 48,985 -87,000 

Excess development program growth -87,000 

JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 

78 ENGINEERING/MANUFACTURING 50,362 49,062 -1,300 

Program management growth -1,300 

79 ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT - MIP 8,448 4,908 -3,540 

Fisca! year 2013 de!ayed new start for navy underwater 

acoustic multiple sonobouy -3,540 
233 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0147 80986A.146

Budget Committee Change from 

R-1 Request Recommended Request 

81 OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT 40,558 33,671 -6,887 

MH-60S avionics development and integration rephasing -2,000 

H-60 AMCM IOC slip -3,000 

MH-XX development engineering support ahead of need -1,887 

82 AV-8B AIRCRAFT - ENG DEV 35,825 33,325 -2,500 

Readiness management plan ECP program growth -2,500 

83 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT 99,891 68,530 -31,361 

CNSfATM development program growth -10,000 

Avionics component improvement program growth -2,500 

Mid-air collision avoidance capability -9.861 

Excess support for project 0572 -9,000 

87 WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM 11,725 8,523 ·3,202 

Combatant craft replacement program growth -1,000 

Program execution -2,202 

88 TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM 68,463 63,463 -5,000 

Maritime tactical command control program in-house growth -5,000 

89 ADVANCED HAWKEYE 152,041 147,041 -5,000 

Government engineering support growth -5,000 

91 ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS 30,208 29,208 -1,000 

Management services growth -1.000 

93 AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 11,401 6,901 4,500 

Crew systems development growth -2,000 

Aircraft systems development growth -2,500 

96 VH-71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT 94,238 83,609 -10,629 

Excess program management and support -10,629 

97 NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) 257,796 157,937 -99,859 

Hardware development contract delay -5,600 

Program execution -94,259 

SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM 

99 ENGINEERING 240,298 320,298 80,000 

Support funding growth ·10,000 

Excess future combat system development and integration 

funding -10,000 

Cruiser retention 100,000 

101 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SOB) 46,007 37,925 -8,082 

Small diameter bomb support funding growth -4,000 

Joint miniature munitions bomb rack government support 

funding carryover -4,082 

102 STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS 75,592 58,592 ·17,000 

SM~6 future capability demonstration ramp -17,000 

103 AIRBORNE MCM 117,854 105,264 ·12,590 

AN/AQS-24 test and evaluation ahead of need -7,090 

AN/AQS-24 excess support funding -2,000 

Excess AMNS support -3,500 
234 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0148 80986A.147

Budget Committee Change from 

R-l Request Recommended Request 

106 FUTURE UNMANNED CARRIER-BASED STRIKE SYSTEM 146,683 96,887 -49,796 

Program execution -49,796 

107 ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS 275,871 193,071 -82,800 

Air and missile defense radar contract delay -79,800 

Dual band radar government engineering services growth -3,000 

108 SSN-688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION 89,672 85,735 -3,937 

Submarine HOR antenna delay -3,937 

109 AIR CONTROL 13,754 10,754 -3,000 

ANISPN-43C delay -3,000 

112 NEW DESIGN SSN 121,566 131,566 10,000 

Program increase ~ small business technology insertion 10,000 

114 SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/LIVE FIRE T&E 155,254 137,421 -17,833 

Energy initiative program delay -15,333 

Excess ship to shore connector support funding -2,500 

117 LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT 26,444 36,444 10,000 

Program increase small business technology insertion 10,000 

121 SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) 130,360 111,360 -19,000 

Ship self defense MK·2 system development ACBffl 

growth -15,000 

Non~lethal weapons development program growth -4,000 

122 SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) 50,209 43,309 -6,900 

NATO Seasparrow objective configuration delay -6,900 

123 SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILLlEW) 164,799 114,799 -50,000 

SEWIP block 3 program delay -50,000 

125 MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT 9,458 28,458 19,000 

Program increase ~ wound care research 13,000 

Program increase - military dental research 6,000 

126 NAVIGATIONIID SYSTEM 51,430 47,430 -4,000 

ISIS and photonics development and obsolescence 

program carryover -4,000 

127 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) - EMD 512,631 497,727 -14,904 

F-358 follow"on development ahead of need -14,904 

128 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) 534,187 522,745 -11,442 

F-358 fol!ow~on development ahead of need -11.442 

130 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 69,659 62,823 -6,836 

Joint technical data integration software 

development/hardware integration program delay -2,416 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for naval justice 

information system -4,420 

132 CH-53K 503,180 494,180 -9,000 

Management support growth -9,000 
235 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0149 80986A.148

Budget Committee Change from 

R-1 Request Recommended Request 

133 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 5,500 -5,500 

Program uncertainty -5.500 

134 MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) 317,358 302,358 -15,000 

P~8A spira! 2 development milestone 8 slip -30,000 

Program increase small business technology insertion 10,000 

Program increase ~ sensor development 5,000 

163 CARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY FOLLOW ON 2,460 1,230 -1,230 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for carrier onboard 

delivery fol!ow~on -1,230 

169 RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) 13,561 8,561 -5,000 

Program growth -5,000 

170 F/A-18 SQUADRONS 131,118 124,618 -6,500 

Excess small diameter bomb integration support -6,500 

172 FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) 46,155 23,439 -22,716 

Battle force tactical network ahead of need -2,777 

Joint aerial layer network - maritime program delay -19,939 

176 AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS 7,240 6,940 -300 

Technology investigation unfunded out year requirement -300 

177 GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR 78,208 75,208 -3,000 

Support growth -3,000 

178 CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 45,124 39,124 -6,000 

Tactical combat training system/large area tracking range 

replacement program delay -6,000 

182 TACTICAL DATA LINKS 197,538 189,886 -7,652 

ATDLS support funding growth -3,600 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for network tactical 

common data link -4,052 

185 AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS 8S,607 78,608 -9,999 

F~135 engine improvement plan lack of definition -9,104 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for carrier/amphibious 

assault ship crash crane -895 

188 MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 178,753 177,153 -1,600 

CREW program management growth -1,600 

MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING 

189 ARMS SYSTEMS 139,594 113,814 -25,780 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for disable point target -655 

Marjne Personnel Carrier program delay -20,875 

Assault Ampibious Vehicle schedule slip -4,250 
236 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0150 80986A.149

190 MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT 42,647 37,034 -5,613 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for MTVR trailers -748 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for family of tactical 

trailers -175 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for family of material 

handling equipment -171 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for enhanced 

environmental control unit -992 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for hybrid 

generator/next generation power distribution system -1,779 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for advanced power 

sources -1,748 

USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE 

191 SYSTEMS (MIP) 34,394 33,394 -1,000 

CESAS program management support -1,000 

192 TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 39,159 15,453 -23,706 

Fiscal year 2013 delayed new start for AIM-9X block III -23,706 

DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/SURFACE 

212 SYSTEMS 19,718 15,718 -4,000 

Excess support funding -4,000 

214 MQ-S UAV 48,713 12,523 ·36,190 

Program execution -36,190 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,185,132 1,384,923 199,791 

ClassIfied adjustment 199,791 
237 

OCEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGY

The Committee commends the Navy for its efforts in developing 

ocean energy technologies as defined in the Energy Independence 

and Security Act of 2007. These efforts will ultimately result in reducing the cost of energy and increasing energy security at Department of Defense facilities. The Committee encourages the Secretary 

of the Navy to coordinate its development efforts with the Department of Energy and designated National Marine Renewable Energy 

Centers for ocean renewable energy demonstration activities at or 

near Department of Defense facilities. 

HIGHLY INTEGRATED PHOTONICS

The Committee is encouraged by the Navy’s development of 

photonic technology to transmit and process information in wired 

and chip-level electronic components. Photonics can dramatically 

reduce platform size, weight, power requirements, and sustainment 

costs. This technology can also be used throughout the Department 

of Defense in various platforms. The Committee encourages the 

Secretary of the Navy to continue the development of this technology and looks forward to the incorporation of photonics in an 

operational platform. 

AUTOMATED TEST AND RE-TEST

The Automated Test and Re-test (ATRT) project continues to 

achieve results. The reduced labor requirements and cost savings 

for programs that have utilized the tool are impressive. The Committee is concerned by reports that the Navy may not yet be fully 

supportive of the effort, may reduce the funding applied to the 

project in execution as well as in future budget years, and does not 

seem to have a plan to take full advantage of this tool. Therefore, 

the Secretary of the Navy is directed to provide a report to the congressional defense committees outlining the plan for the full implementation of ATRT. This report should include a funding plan and 

timeline for the continued development and technology transition of 

ATRT. This report shall be submitted not later than 90 days after 

the enactment of this Act. 

BONE MARROW REGISTRY

The Committee recommendation includes $31,500,000 for the Department of the Navy to be administered by the Bone Marrow Registry, also known as and referred to within the Naval Medical Research Center as the C.W. Bill Young Marrow Donor Recruitment 

and Research Program. Funds appropriated for the Bone Marrow 

Registry shall remain available only for the purposes for which 

they are appropriated, and may only be obligated for the Bone 

Marrow Registry. This Department of Defense donor center has recruited more than 750,000 Department of Defense volunteers, and 

provides more marrow donors per week than any other donor center in the Nation. More than 5,600 servicemembers and other Department volunteers from this donor center have provided marrow 

to save the lives of patients. The success of this national and international life-saving program for military and civilian patients, 

which now includes more than 11,000,000 potential volunteer doVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00247 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
238 

nors, is admirable. Further, the agencies involved in contingency 

planning are encouraged to continue to include the Bone Marrow 

Registry in the development and testing of their contingency plans. 

The Department of Defense form (DD Form 1414) shall show this 

as a congressional interest item. The Department is further directed to release all the funds appropriated for this purpose to the 

Bone Marrow Registry not later than 60 days after the enactment 

of this Act. 

SHIPBOARD LIGHTING

The Committee is aware that the Navy is extremely active in energy initiatives to reduce the acquisition and operating cost of the 

fleet. With light emitting diode (LED) lighting technology rapidly 

advancing, the replacement of existing fluorescent shipboard lighting with LED lights would seem to be an idea well suited for the 

Navy to explore as an energy initiative. The Committee urges the 

Secretary of the Navy to study the concept of converting shipboard 

lighting to LED lights. 

COASTAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH

The Committee understands the importance of the littoral region 

to the Navy. The Committee believes that additional research regarding the characteristics of the magnetic and electric fields in the 

coastal ocean regions and the development of predictive techniques 

to distinguish ships and submarines from naturally occurring background ocean features would pay dividends as the Navy shifts operations to the littoral regions. Therefore, the Committee urges the 

Secretary of the Navy to conduct additional research in this critical 

area. 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, AIR 

FORCE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $25,432,738,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 25,702,946,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 24,947,354,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥755,592,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the research, development, 

test and evaluation activities of the Department of the Air Force. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
239 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0151 80986A.150

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AIR FORCE 

BASIC RESEARCH 

DEFENSE RESEARCH SCI ENCES. 

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES. 

HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES. 

TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH. 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

MATERIALS. 

AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES. 

HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH. 

AEROSPACE PROPULSION. 

AEROSPACE SENSORS 

SPACE TECHNOLOGY. 

10 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS. 

11 DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY. 

12 DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS,. 

13 HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH. 

TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH., 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

14 ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS. 

15 SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T). 

16 ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS. 

17 AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV IDEMO, 

18 AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY.,. 

19 ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY. 

20 ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY. 

21 MAUl SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS),. 

22 HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 

23 CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY, 

24 ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY. 

25 MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM .. 

26 BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION .. 

TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

373,151 373.151 

138,333 138 333 

13,286 13,286 

524,770 524,770 

116,846 116,846 

119,672 119,672 

89,483 109 483 +20,000 

197.546 197 546 

127,539 127 539 

104,063 94 063 -10,000 

81,521 81 .521 

112,845 112 845 

138,161 138, 161 

40,217 40 217 

-.. ~ . ----. - ------------ -.-.--------

,127,893 1 ,137,893 +10,000 

39,572 39,572 

12.800 12,800 

30,579 30 579 

77, 347 77,347 

149, 321 149 321 

49, 128 49, 128 

68,071 60 071 -8,000 

26,299 26,299 

20,967 20 967 

33,996 33,996 

19,000 19,000 

41,353 41 ,353 

49,093 49.093 

~ ~ ~ ~ ..... --. _ .... _-_ .. 

617,526 609,526 -8,000 
240 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0152 80986A.151

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT 

28 INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT. 983 3,983 

29 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT. 874 3,874 

32 SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY. 27,024 23,024 -4.000 

33 COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY. 15,899 15,899 

34 NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. 4,568 4,568 

35 INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D. 379 379 

36 SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP) 28 764 10 364 -18,400 

38 INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE. 86,737 86 737 

40 POLLUTION PREVENTION (OEM/VAL). 953 953 

42 NEXT GENERATION BOMBER. 379,437 379 437 

44 TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER. 606 2,606 

45 HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM. 103 103 

47 REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION. 16 018 16 018 

49 AIR AND SPACE OPS CENTER. 58,861 58.861 

50 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION. 500 2,500 

51 GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT. 21 ,175 21,175 

53 TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM. 13,636 13,636 

54 SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM - SPACE ACTIVITIES .. 2,799 2,799 

55 THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR. 70,160 59,160 -11,000 

56 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT). 137,233 127,233 -10 000 

TOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT .. 876,709 833,309 -43,400 
241 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0153 80986A.152

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 

58 INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT, ' 977 977 

61 SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING, 601 601 

62 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT, ' ,971 ,971 

64 TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE, 51,456 51,456 

65 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT. 50 50 

66 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) , 115,000 115,000 

67 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS, 23,930 23,930 

68 SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS, 400,258 350,258 ·50,000 

69 AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK. 575 4,575 

70 SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD, 352,532 322,832 -29,700 

71 ARMAMENT 10RDNANCE DEVELOPMENT, 16,284 16,284 

72 SUBMUNITIONS. 2,564 2,564 

73 AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT, 17 036 17 036 

74 LI FE SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 273 273 

75 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES, 33 200 33,200 

78 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) , 816 335 798,535 ·17,800 

79 INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE, 145 442 140,442 ·5,000 

80 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE), 27 963 24,963 ·3, 000 

81 LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON, 5,000 5,000 

82 ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION, 129,411 129,411 

83 F· 22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3, 2B, 131,100 118 000 ·13,100 

84 NEXT GENERATION AERIAL REFUELING AIRCRAFT, 1,558,590 1,558590 

85 CSAR HH·60 RECAPITALIZATION, 393,558 333 558 ·60,000 

86 HCIMC·130 RECAP RDT&E, 6,242 242 

87 ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE). 272,872 258,872 ·14,000 

88 POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) 124 805 124,805 

89 WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE), 13 948 13,948 

90 B·2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, ' 303,500 273,500 ·30 000 
242 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0154 80986A.153

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

91 NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION. 

94 FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING. 

97 CV-22 .. 

TOTAL. ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT. 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

99 THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT. 

100 MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT. 

101 RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE. 

103 INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION. 

104 TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT. 

105 ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE). 

106 SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP). 

107 FACILITIES RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION - TEST & EVAL. 

108 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT - TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT. 

109 MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE. 

110 SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE. 

111 ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT. 

112 GENERAL SKILL TRAINING. 

114 INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES .. 

TOTAL. RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

67,874 55.874 -12.000 

4.663 4,663 

46,705 46,705 

5.078 715 4.844,115 -234,600 

17 690 17 690 

34.841 34 841 

32.956 32,956 

13.610 13.610 

742,658 742,658 

14,203 14,203 

13 000 13 000 

44.160 44,160 

27 643 27 643 

13,935 13,935 

192,348 182,348 -10 000 

28,647 28,647 

315 315 

785 785 

1,179,791 1,169,791 -10,000 
243 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0155 80986A.154

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

115 GPS III • OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT. 383 500 365,500 ·18.000 

117 WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE. 000 5,000 

118 AIR FORCE INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEM. 90.097 90,097 

119 ANTI·TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY. 32.086 32,086 

121 B·52 SQUADRONS. 24.007 24,007 

122 AIR· LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) .. 450 450 

123 B·1 B SQUADRONS. 19,589 19.589 

124 B· 2 SQUADRONS. 100,194 87.810 ·12,384 

125 STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM· USSTRATCOM. 37,448 37.448 

128 REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION. ,700 1,700 

130 WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS (WRAP) RAPID TRAN 844 3,844 

131 MQ·9 UAV. 128,328 128,328 

133 A·10 SQUADRONS. 614 614 

134 F·16 SQUADRONS .. 177 298 167,298 ·10 000 

135 F·15E SQUADRONS .. 244,289 234,289 ·10 000 

136 MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION .. 13,138 13,138 

137 F·22 SQUADRONS. 328,542 328,542 

138 F· 35 SQUADRONS. 33,000 10,000 ·23,000 

139 TACTICAL AIM MISSILES. 15,460 15,460 

140 ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR·TO·AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) .. 84,172 84,172 

142 COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY. 2,582 582 

143 COMBAT RESCUE· PARARESCUE .. 542 542 

144 AF TENCAP. 89.816 89 816 

145 PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT. 1,075 1,075 

146 COMPASS CALL. 10,782 10,782 

147 AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. 139,369 108,239 ·31,130 

148 ISR INNOVATIONS FUND. 3,000 +3,000 
244 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0156 80986A.155

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

149 JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM). 

150 AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC). 

151 CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC). 

152 AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS). 

153 TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS. 

156 COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES. 

158 TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY- -MOD .. 

159 C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK ... 

160 COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) CONSTELLATION. 

161 DCAPES. 

162 JOINT SURVEILLANCE AND TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTEM. 

163 SEEK EAGLE. 

164 USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION. 

165 WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS .. 

166 DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES .. 

167 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS. 

169 CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES .. 

170 AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS. 

171 AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS. 

179 SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE. 

180 E-4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC). 

181 MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK. 

182 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM. 

183 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM. 

185 MILSATCOM TERMINALS 

187 AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE. 

190 GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM). 

191 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE. 

192 DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER. 

193 SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE). 

194 WEATHER SERVICE. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

6.373 

22,820 

7,029 

186,256 

743 

4,471 

10,250 

1,431 

7,329 

15,081 

13,248 

24,342 

10,448 

5,512 

3.301 

62.605 

68,099 

14,047 

853 

12 197 

18,267 

36,288 

90,231 

725 

140.170 

117,110 

4,430 

048 

288 

35,698 

24,667 

6 373 

22,820 

7,029 

176 856 -9,400 

743 

4,471 

10,250 

,431 

7,329 

15 081 

23,248 +10,000 

24,342 

10,448 

5,512 

3.301 

62,605 

68,099 

14,047 

5,853 

10,697 -1,500 

18,267 

18.581 -17 ,707 

90,231 

725 

140.170 

117,110 

4.430 

048 

288 

35,698 

24.667 
245 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0157 80986A.156

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

195 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, & LANDING SYSTEM (ATC). 

196 AERIAL TARGETS. 

199 SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES. 

200 ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION. 

201 DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. 

206 SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER .. 

207 SPACE WARFARE CENTER. 

208 INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE. 

209 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) 

211 DRAGON U-2. 

212 ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES. 

213 AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS. 

214 MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS. 

215 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS. 

216 PREDATOR UAV (JMIP),. 

217 RQ-4 UAV. 

218 NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGET (TIARA). 

219 COMMON DATA LINK (COL). 

220 NATO AGS. 

221 SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE. 

222 GPS I II SPACE SEGMENT. 

223 JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM. 

224 RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION, 

226 NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE), 

227 SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS. 

229 SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW). 

230 C-130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON. 

231 C-5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS. 

232 C-17 AIRCRAFT. 

233 C-130J PROGRAM. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

35,674 

21,186 

195 

1,430 

330 

696 

469 

8,289 

13,345 

18,700 

3,000 

37,828 

13,491 

7,498 

3,326 

134.406 

7,413 

40,503 

264,134 

23,016 

221,276 

58,523 

2,218 

50,547 

18,807 

,079 

400 

61,492 

109,134 

22,443 

29,674 -6,000 

21,186 

195 

1,430 

330 

3,696 

2,469 

8,289 

13,345 

13 700 -5,000 

3,000 

37,828 

13,491 

5,498 -2 000 

3,326 

164,406 +30,000 

7,413 

40,503 

264 134 

23,016 

206,276 -15,000 

56,523 -2,000 

2,218 

50 547 

12 807 -6,000 

,079 

26 400 +26 000 

61,492 

106,134 -3,000 

32,443 +10,000 
246 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0158 80986A.157

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

234 LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) . 4,116 4,116 

238 OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT. 44 553 44.553 

239 SPECIAL TACTICS I COMBAT CONTROL .. 213 6,213 

240 DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF). 1,605 1,605 

242 LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) . 95,238 65,238 -30.000 

243 SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 10,925 20,925 +10,000 

244 OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING. .347 .347 

245 OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES. 65 65 

246 JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY. ,083 1,083 

247 CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM. ,577 1,577 

248 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 5,990 990 

249 AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY .. 786 786 

250 FACILITIES OPERATION - -ADMINISTRATION. 654 654 

251 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 135,735 135,735 

~ -" - ~ " " "_OW ""--------- __ ""W" ____ '" 

TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 4,423,014 4,309,893 -113,121 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 11,874,528 11,518,057 -356,471 

_____ • ____ w_ 

------------ "-----------

TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AIR FORCE 25,702,946 24,947,354 - 755,592 :::=;;::;;;:::;=;;;==== =====:::====== ============ 
247 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0159 80986A.158

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

R-l Request Recommended Request 

HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH 89,483 109,483 20,000 

Program increase 20,000 

SPACE TECHNOLOGY 104,063 94,063 -10,000 

Hold to fiscal year 2013 level -10,000 

20 ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY 68,071 60,071 -8,000 

Hold 10 fIscal year 2013 level -8,000 

32 SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY 27,024 23,024 -4,000 

Hold to fiscal year 2013 leve! -4,000 

36 SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP) 28,764 10,364 -18,400 

SATCOM resiliency new start / slow execution for threat -18,400 

mitigation 

55 THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG RANGE RADAR (3DELRR) 70,160 59,160 -11,000 

Program delay -11,000 

NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER 

56 EQUIPMENT) (SPACE) 137,233 127,233 -10,000 

Excessive growth in management services -10,000 

68 SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS 400,258 350,258 -50,000 

One year schedule delay -50,000 

70 SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH 352,532 322,832 -29,700 

Modernization projects execution delays excluding -29,700 

exploitation efforts 

78 F-35 816,335 798,535 -17,800 

Deployability and Suitability Enhancements delay -17,800 

79 ICBM -EMD 145,442 140,442 -5,000 

Transporter Erector Replacement excess funds -5,000 

EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM 

80 (SPACE) 27,963 24,963 -3,000 

Hold support costs to fiscal year 2013 level, dual launch -3,000 

83 F-22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3_2B 131,100 118,000 -13,100 

Execution delays -13,100 

85 COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER 393,558 333,558 -60,000 

Program de!ays I projected savings pending updated -60,000 

program estimate 

87 ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) 272,872 258,872 -14,000 

Ahead of need I excess growth in hosted payload and -14,000 

business operations support 

90 B-2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 303,500 273,500 -30,000 

Rapid Acqtlisition Initjative savings -30,000 
248 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0160 80986A.159

Budget Committee Change from 

R-l Request Recommended Request 

91 NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION 67,874 55,874 -12,000 

B61 LEP engineering and manufacturing development -12,000 

phase 1 funds ahead of need 

110 SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER CIVILIAN WORKFORCE 192,348 182,348 -10,000 

Excess to need -10,000 

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III- OPERATIONAL 

115 CONTROL SEGMENT 383,500 365,500 -18,000 

Excessive growth in FFRDC support -18,000 

124 B-2 SQUADRONS 100,194 87,810 -12,384 

Common VLF receiver increment 1 contract delay -12,384 

134 F-16 SQUADRONS 177,298 167,298 -10,000 

CAPES execution delays -10,000 

135 F-15E SQUADRONS 244,289 234,289 -10,000 

EPAWSS conlract delays -10,000 

138 F-35 SQUADRONS 33,000 10,000 -23,000 

Block 4 ahead of need -23,000 

AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT 

147 PROGRAM 139,369 108,239 -31,130 

F135 engine program delays -31.130 

148 ISR INNOVATIONS 3,000 3,000 

Additional flight test funding 3,000 

152 AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) 186,256 176,856 -9,400 

Electronic Protection delays -9,400 

162 JOINT SURVEILLANCE/TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTE 13,248 23,248 10,000 

T~3 test aircraft 10,000 

179 SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE 12,197 10,697 -1,500 

Hold to fiscal year 2013 level -1,500 

MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS 

181 NETWORK (MEECN) 36,288 18,581 -17,707 

GASNT program delays -17,707 

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH AND LANDING 

195 SYSTEM (ATCALS) 35,674 29,674 -6,000 

D~RAPCON engineering and manufacturing development -6,000 

contract delay 

211 DRAGON U-2 18,700 13,700 -5,000 

Program excess -5,000 

215 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUNDISURFACE SYSTEMS 7,498 5,498 -2,000 

Inadequate justification -2,000 

217 RQ-4 UAV 134,406 164,406 30,000 

Multiple execution delays -20,000 

Integrate and test U~2 sensors on Block 30 50,000 
249 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0161 80986A.160

Budget Committee Change from 

R-l Request Recommended Request 

222 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 221,276 206,276 -15,000 

Ahead of need -15,000 

223 JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM 58,523 56,523 -2,000 

Underexecution -2,000 

227 SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS 18,807 12,807 ·6,000 

One year schedule delay -6,000 

230 C-130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON 400 26,400 26,000 

Propulsion system propeller upgrades 26,000 

232 C-17 AIRCRAFT 109,134 106,134 ·3,000 

Program management administration growth -3,000 

233 C-130J PROGRAM 22,443 32,443 10,000 

Block 8,1 shortfall 10,000 

242 LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) 95,238 65,238 -30,000 

Program excess -30,000 

243 SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 10,925 20,925 10,000 

Alternate energy research 10,000 

999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 11,874,528 11,518,057 ·356,471 

Classified adjustment -356.471 
250 

GLOBAL HAWK BLOCK 30

The Committee continues to support retention of the Global 

Hawk Block 30 fleet and includes language in the Act directing the 

Air Force to execute funds previously appropriated for the procurement of three additional Block 30 aircraft, sensors (including the 

Enhanced Integrated Sensor Suite and Airborne Signals Intelligence Payload), and accompanying equipment and services. The 

Air Force recently reported to the Committee that the adoption of 

U–2 sensors to Block 30 aircraft is feasible and less costly than improvement of Block 30 sensors to the level of ‘‘parity’’ with the U– 

2. The Committee recommendation includes $50,000,000 only for 

the integration, test, and demonstration of U–2 imagery sensors on 

a Block 30 aircraft. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air 

Force to submit an execution plan for these additional funds to the 

congressional defense committees not later than 90 days after the 

enactment of this Act. 

JSTARS TEST AIRCRAFT

The Committee is concerned by the Air Force’s proposal in the 

budget request to place the Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar 

System (JSTARS) T–3 test aircraft in preservation storage. The 

Committee is concerned by the impact that this proposal will have 

on current integration and test efforts, especially those required by 

the National Guard. The Committee therefore recommends an additional $10,000,000 to continue normal operations of the JSTARS 

test aircraft. 

HARD TARGET NEW START EFFORTS

The budget request includes $14,000,000 for two new starts related to hard targets, including $2,500,000 for the 5,000-pound 

Joint Direct Attack Munitions (5K JDAM) demonstration under the 

JDAM program and $11,500,000 for the advanced 2,000-pound penetrator (A2K) demonstration under Armament/Ordnance Development. The Committee notes that an analysis of alternatives (AoA) 

on hard target munitions is underway and is scheduled to complete 

in the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. The Committee recommendation includes full funding for these new start efforts but 

directs that no funds shall be obligated or expended for 5K JDAM 

or A2K until 15 days after the Secretary of the Air Force reports 

to the congressional defense committees on the results of the approved hard target munitions AoA and describes how these new 

start efforts are consistent with those results. 

AIRBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR/MOVING TARGET INDICATOR

The Committee is concerned by the lack of funding in the budget 

request for efforts to further the airborne synthetic aperture radar/ 

moving target indicator (SAR/MTI) mission, despite the completion 

of the airborne SAR/MTI and Joint STARS mission area analysis 

of alternatives (AoA) in June 2012. The Committee urges the Secretary of the Air Force to include all necessary funding required to 

initiate any acquisition effort pursuant to a material development 

decision for airborne SAR/MTI systems in its fiscal year 2015 budget request. The Committee also notes that $10,000,000 was proVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00260 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
251 

vided in the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations 

Act, 2013, to initiate any such effort, and directs the Secretary of 

the Air Force to notify the congressional defense committees not 

later than September 30, 2013 of its intentions regarding the use 

of these funds. 

F–22 OPEN SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

The Committee is supportive of recent efforts by the Air Force 

to pursue an open system architecture for F–22 mission systems, 

which will allow the introduction of greater competition in the acquisition of existing and future upgrades to the only existing operational fifth-generation fighter aircraft possessed by the U.S. 

Armed Forces. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Air 

Force to increase its exploitation of this open systems architecture 

and to subject a greater number of modernization and modification 

efforts to competitive procurement. 

KC–46A

The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to continue 

to submit quarterly reports on any KC–46A contract modifications 

with a cost greater than or equal to $5,000,000, as directed by the 

explanatory statement accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012. 

CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY

The Committee continues to direct the Secretary of the Air Force 

to make high priority investments in technologies and systems that 

will ensure the safety of pilots in environments contaminated by 

chemical or biological agents as well as the timely decontamination 

of aircraft and equipment that may be affected by exposure to such 

environments, and to ensure that funding for such investments is 

adequately phased to support chemical, biological, radiological, and 

nuclear (CBRN) survivability for all systems designated as CBRN 

mission critical. 

STRATEGIC AND CRITICAL METALS

The Committee recognizes the importance of strategic and critical metals such as aluminum, beryllium, nickel-based superalloys, 

and titanium. As these metals are used in aircraft, jet engines, and 

other critical weapon systems and defense products, the Committee 

emphasizes the important role that the availability and cost-efficiency of these metals play in the affordability of weapon systems. 

The public-private partnership between the Air Force Research 

Laboratory and the Metals Affordability Initiative Consortium aims 

to reduce the cost of these metals and the time needed to incorporate such metals into systems. The Committee encourages the 

Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of Defense to pursue 

both cooperative and competitive efforts to solve challenges related 

to affordability and implementation. 

AIRCRAFT WINDOWS

As an alternative to replacing polycarbonate and acrylic windows 

on fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft, the Committee encourages 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
252 

the Secretary of Defense to explore and utilize new technologies, 

where appropriate, that can improve aircrew and passenger survivability while reducing operating costs. 

LASER-DRIVEN X-RAY TECHNOLOGY

The Committee continues to place a high priority on research 

that addresses the threats of nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism, as well as research that addresses efficient and cost-effective maintenance of heavy equipment and personnel safety. The 

Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to conduct research 

in new, laser-driven x-ray technologies with a proven capability to 

detect nuclear weapons and investigate heavy equipment to identify potential equipment failures before they happen. 

NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE PROGRAM PLANNING AND EXECUTION

The Committee continues to monitor the debate within the National Security Space community over how to most cost effectively 

design and manage space programs. The Committee is concerned 

that affinity for certain architecture concepts may be affecting program execution and putting at risk operations of some of the Nation’s most important and critical national security space capabilities. To help inform the debate and assist in putting the nation’s 

space programs on a sustainable plan for the future, the Director 

of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation is directed to update 

the space industrial base study to quantitatively assess the consequences of the various acquisition approaches being advocated 

within the space community. The approaches reviewed should include, but not be limited to, new architectures of small satellites, 

evolution of legacy systems, and leveraging of commercial systems. 

The report should address the complete system, including the space 

segment, ground segment, and user terminals such that a complete 

cost to implement is understood. The results shall be provided to 

the congressional defense committees not later than December 31, 

2013. 

SPACE MODERNIZATION INITIATIVE

The Committee is concerned by the inability of the Air Force to 

define its Space Modernization Initiative (SMI), despite many questions by the Committee. Key to the discussion is the relevance of 

SMI-funded projects to the programs of record within which they 

are funded and the ability of those projects to have a significant 

and cost-effective contribution to those programs. The Committee 

directs the Secretary of the Air Force to submit a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act, which provides a definition of space modernization initiative (or initiatives, if it differs by program). The report 

should describe how projects or concepts are proposed; explain how 

concepts are evaluated for funding, including relevance to the program of record and if certain project types would be excluded from 

SMI; define who is responsible for decisions, if there is a review 

board, and if current industry participants or other stakeholders 

outside the Air Force are involved in proposing or evaluating conVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00262 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
253 

cepts; and define how effectiveness will be evaluated, both of individual projects and of SMI as a whole. 

SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM GROUND ENHANCEMENTS

In fiscal year 2013, the Air Force was provided $40,000,000 for 

acceleration of the Space Based Infrared System (SBIRS) ground 

segment automated sensor tasking and an additional $40,000,000 

for ground enhancements. The Committee directs the Secretary of 

the Air Force to provide an update to the congressional defense 

committees not later than 60 days after the enactment of this Act 

regarding the progress of these SBIRS elements, the status of the 

funds, and the schedule adjustment for automated sensor tasking 

that resulted from the funding. 

HUMAN PERFORMANCE SENSING

The Committee recognizes and supports the Air Force Research 

Laboratory’s (AFRL) research into human performance sensing, 

which is a key element of human-machine interface technology. Advances in nano-biomaterial technology hold the potential to greatly 

increase human performance sensing capability, thereby improving 

mission performance and personnel safety. The Committee encourages the AFRL to continue its research into the manufacture of 

nano-biomaterial sensors capable of detecting biomarkers and other 

substances which correlate to conditions such as stress, fatigue, 

and organ damage. 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, 

DEFENSE-WIDE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $18,631,946,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 17,667,108,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 17,885,538,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +218,430,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the research, development, 

test and evaluation activities of the Department of Defense for defense-wide activities. The total amount recommended in the bill 

will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
254 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0162 80986A.161

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE-WIDE 

BASIC RESEARCH 

DTRA UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP BASIC RESEARCH. 45,837 45,837 

DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES. 315,033 315,033 

BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES. 11,171 11,171 

BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE. 49,500 49,500 

NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM. B4,271 84,271 

HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES & UNIV (HBCU). 30,895 35,895 +5,000 

CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM. 51,426 51,426 

----------- TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH. 588,133 593, 133 +5,000 

APPLI ED RESEARCH 

JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY .. 20,065 20,065 

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY. 114,790 114,790 

11 LI NCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM. 46,875 46,875 

13 APPLIED RESEARCH FOR ADVANCEMENT S&T PRIORITIES. 45.000 45,000 

14 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 413,260 413 260 

15 COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS. 16,330 16, 330 

17 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE. 24,537 24 537 

18 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM. 227,065 227 065 

20 CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH. 18 908 18,908 

22 TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY. 225 977 228,209 +2 232 

23 MTERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY. 166,654 166,654 

24 ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY. 243,469 243,469 

25 WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES .. 175,282 175,282 

26 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE. 11 ,107 11 ,107 

27 SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 29,246 29,246 

TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH. 1,778,565 1 ,780,797 +2.232 
255 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0163 80986A.162

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

28 JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECH INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS AD 26,646 20,146 -6,500 

29 SOILIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT. 19,420 19,420 

30 COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT .. 77,792 87,792 +10 000 

31 COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES- -PROLIF PREV & DEFEAT 274,033 274,033 

32 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY .. 309,203 199 203 -110.000 

32X COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY. 70,000 +70,000 

34 JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 19,305 19,305 

35 AGILE TRANSPO FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21) - THEATER CA 7,565 565 

36 SPECIAL PROGRAM- -MDA TECHNOLOGY. 40,426 40 426 

37 ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS. 149 804 149,804 

38 SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY. 172 546 172,546 

39 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM - ADVANCED DEV 170 847 170,847 

40 JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .. 9,009 9,009 

41 JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS. 174,428 167,428 -7,000 

42 NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES. 20,000 20,000 

45 CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH .. 19,668 14 668 -5,000 

47 DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROG 34,041 34 041 

48 EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 61,971 53 971 -8 000 

50 GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS. 20,000 20,000 

51 DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY. 30,256 20,256 -10,000 

52 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM. 72,324 72,324 

53 MICROELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT. 82,700 82,700 

54 JOINT \,ARFIGHTING PROGRAM. 8,431 8,431 

55 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES. 117 080 117,080 

57 COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS. 239 078 239,078 

59 NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY. 259,006 259,006 

60 SENSOR TECHNOLOGY. 286,364 286,364 

DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM. 250,000 +250 000 
256 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0164 80986A.163

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

61 DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 12,116 12,116 

62 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE. 19.008 19,008 

63 QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS. 78,532 78,532 

65 JOINT EXPERIMENTATION. 12,667 12,667 

66 MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE. 41,370 34.370 -7. 000 

69 TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY. 92.508 92.508 

70 OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT. 52,001 52,001 

71 CWMD SYSTEMS. 52,053 52,053 

72 SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 46,809 44,309 -2,500 

TOTAL. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 3.109.007 3,283.007 +174,000 

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 

75 NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT. 63.641 63,641 

76 RETRACT LARCH. 19.152 19,152 

77 WALKOFF. 70,763 70 763 

79 ADVANCE SENSOR APPLICATIONS PROGRAM. 17,230 17 ,230 

80 ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM 71,453 66,453 -5,000 

81 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT. 268,990 268,990 

82 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MlDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT. .033,903 ,104,103 +70.200 

83 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM. 196.237 196 237 

84 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS. 315,183 361 ,783 +46 600 

86 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ENABLING PROGRAMS. 377,605 372,605 -5,000 

87 SPECIAL PROGRAMS - MDA. 286.613 266.613 -20,000 

88 AEGIS BMD. 937,056 937,056 

89 SPACE SURVEILLANCE & TRACKING SYSTEM. 44 947 44,947 

90 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS. 515 6,515 

91 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE C2BMG. 418,355 418,355 

92 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT .. 47,419 47.419 

BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE INTERGRATION AND OPERATIONS 

93 CENTER (MDIDC). 52,131 52,131 

94 REGARD I NG TRENCH 13,864 13,864 

95 SEA BASED X - BAND RADAR (SBX). 44,478 44 478 

96 ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS. 95,782 268,782 +173,000 

97 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST. 375,866 375,866 

98 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS. 495,257 491 ,432 -3,825 

99 HUMANITARIAN DEMINING. 11,704 11,704 
257 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0165 80986A.164

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

100 COALITION WARFARE 9,842 9,842 

101 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM, 3,312 13,312 +10,000 

102 ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, 130,000 15,000 -115,000 

103 DOD UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT, 8,300 8,300 

104 WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE, 30,000 30,000 

108 JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION", 7,402 7,402 

110 JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION & INTEROPERABILITY TEAM, 7,506 7,506 

111 LAND-BASED SM- 3 (LBSM3) 129,374 129,374 

112 AEGIS SM-3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT, 308,522 308 522 

115 JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM, 3,169 3,169 

116 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE, 946 946 

TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION, 5,902,517 6,053,492 +150,975 

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 

118 NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT, 8,155 8,155 

119 PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, 65,440 65 440 

120 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM, 451 ,306 451,306 

122 ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO), 29,138 29,138 

123 JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTlDS) 19,475 19,475 

124 WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES, 12,901 12,901 

125 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, 13,812 13 812 

126 HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE, 386 386 

127 DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM, 763 3,763 

128 OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES" 6,788 788 

129 DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION, 27,917 27,917 

130 DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION, 22,297 22,297 

131 DEFENSE AGENCY INITIATIVES FINANCIAL SYSTEM, 51,689 51,689 

132 DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITY 6,184 6,184 

133 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM, 12,083 12,083 

134 DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM), 3,302 3,302 

TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT, 734,636 734,636 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

135 DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS), 6,393 6,393 

136 JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT 2,479 2,479 

137 CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT, , 240,213 179,713 -60,500 

138 ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 2,127 2,127 
258 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0166 80986A.165

(DOLLARS I N THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

139 THERMAL VICAR. 8,287 8,287 

140 JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) 31,000 31,000 

141 TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS. 24,379 24,379 

143 FOREIGN MATERIAL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION. 54.311 54,311 

144 JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION. 47,462 47,462 

145 CLASSIFIED PROGRAM USD(P) 94,000 +94,000 

146 FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING. 12,134 12 134 

147 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING. 44,237 44 237 

148 STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT,. 5,871 5.871 

149 NUCLEAR MATTERS - PHYSICAL SECURITY. , . 5,028 5,028 

150 SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION. 6,301 6,301 

151 GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) 6,504 6,504 

152 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM. 92,046 92,046 

158 SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH/CHALLENGE ADMINISTR ,868 1,868 

159 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS. 362 8,362 

160 DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTlC). 56,024 56,024 

161 R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING & EVALUATION 6,908 6,908 

162 DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION. 15,451 19,451 +4 000 

164 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT) 71,659 71,659 

165 BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS. 4,083 4,083 

167 OPERATIONS SECURITY (OPSEC) .. 306 5,306 

168 JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT,. 097 2,097 

172 SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (10) CAPABILITIES. 8,394 8,394 

175 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (10). 7,624 7,624 

178 COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION. 43 247 43 247 

179 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS - MDA. 37,712 37 712 

180 IT SOFTWARE DEV INITIATIVES. 607 607 

CLASS I FI ED PROGRAMS 54,914 54,914 

TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT. 913,028 950,528 +37,500 
259 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0167 80986A.166

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

182 ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS). 7.552 552 

183 REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH & PARTNERSHIP FOR PEAC 3.270 270 

184 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SY 287 287 

185 INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT 14.000 10.000 -4 000 

186 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 1.955 .955 

187 GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT. 13.250 13 250 

188 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS D 13 026 13 026 

190 JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY. 12 652 12.652 

191 PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM 061 061 

192 C4I INTEROPERABI LITY. 72.726 72 726 

194 JOINT I ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING. 6.524 6.524 

201 NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT. 512 512 

202 DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING & INTEGRATION. 12 867 12.867 

203 LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS (DCS). 36. 565 36.565 

204 MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK. 13. 144 13.144 

205 PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI). .060 1.060 

206 KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) .. 33.279 33.279 

207 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM. 10.673 10.673 

208 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM. 181.567 181 .567 

210 GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM, 34.288 34 288 

211 JO I NT SPECTRUM CENTER, 7.741 7. 741 

212 NET -CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES), 3.325 3.325 

213 JOINT MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE, 1.246 1.246 

214 TELEPORT PROGRAM. 5.147 5.147 

216 SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES. 17.352 17.352 

220 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE, 3.658 3.658 

221 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP) , 9.752 9.752 

225 POll CY R&D PROGRAMS. , 3.210 3.210 

227 NET CENTRICITY. 21.602 21.602 

230 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUNDI SURFACE SYSTEMS, 5.195 5.195 

233 DISTRIBUTEO COMMON GROUND I SURFACE SYSTEMS, 3.348 3.348 

235 MQ-1 PREDATOR A UAV, 641 641 

238 HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM. 338 2.338 

239 INT'L INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT. ADVANCEMENT, 4.372 4.372 
260 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0168 80986A.167

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

247 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS. 24,691 24.691 

248 LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES. 4,659 4,659 

249 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (JCS). 3,533 3,533 

250 MQ·9 UAV. 1,314 1,314 

254 SPECIAL OPERATIONS AVIATION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEV. 156,561 142 868 ·13 693 

256 SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 7,705 7, 705 

257 SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS. 42,620 42,620 

261 WARRIOR SYSTEMS. 17,970 17,970 

262 SPECIAL PROGRAMS. 7,424 7,424 

268 SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES .. 2,206 2,206 

271 SOF UNDERWATER SYSTEMS. 18,325 19 481 +1,156 

274 SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES. 3, 304 3,304 

275 SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE. 16 021 16,021 

TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 867,518 850.981 ·16.537 

999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 773.704 3,638 964 -134,740 

TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DEF·WIDE. 17,667.108 17 885,538 +218,430 
261 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0169 80986A.168

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

R·l Request Recommended Request 

HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES 

(HBCU) 30,895 35,895 5,000 

Program adjustment 5,000 

22 TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY 225,977 228,209 2,232 

Program increase - return to fiscal year 2013 level 2,232 

JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 

28 INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 26,646 20,146 ·6,500 

Program adjustment -6,500 

30 COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 77,792 87,792 10,000 

Unjustified reduction 10,000 

32 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY 309,203 199,203 ·110,000 

Directed energy research unjustified growth -20,000 

Advanced technology - unjustified growth -20,000 

Common kit! vehicle technology - transfer to line 32X -70,000 

32X COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY 70,000 70,000 

Common kill vehicle technology - transfer from line 32 70,000 

41 JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 174,428 167,428 ·7,000 

Program adjustment to disruptive demonstration -7,000 

45 CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH 19,668 14,668 ·5,000 

Excess to need -5,000 

EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY 

48 DEVELOPMENT 61,971 53,971 ·8,000 

Program adjustment to disruptive tech development -8,000 

DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE 

51 TECHNOLOGY 30,256 20,256 ·10,000 

Poor execution ·10,000 

60XX DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION FUND 250,000 250,000 

Program increase 250,000 

66 MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE 41,370 34,370 ·7,000 

Program adjustment to effects analysis cet! ·7,000 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 

72 DEVELOPMENT 46,809 44,309 .2,500 

Special Comms Field Segment Enterprlse - fiscal year 

2013 delayed new start ·2,500 

ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL 

80 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM 71,453 66,453 ·5,000 

Excess growth ·5,000 
262 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0170 80986A.169

BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE 

82 SEGMENT 1,033,903 1,104,103 70,200 

Acce!eration of potentia! third site 70,200 

84 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS 315,183 361,783 46,600 

Sensors directorate operations - previously funded ·3.400 

Enhanced discrimination capability 50,000 

86 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ENABLING PROGRAMS 377,605 372,605 ·5,000 

Manufacturing and producibility - unjustified growth ·2,000 

Information assurance/computer network defense -

unjustified growth ·3,000 

87 SPECIAL PROGRAMS· MDA 286,613 266,613 .20,000 

Program adjustment ·20,000 

96 ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS 95,782 268,782 173,000 

Israeli Upper tier 22,100 

Israel! Arrow program 33,700 

Short range bamstic missile defense 117,200 

98 BMD Targets 495,257 491,432 ·3,825 

Program operations - unjustified growth ·3,825 

101 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM 3,312 13,312 10,000 

Program increase 10,000 

102 ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES 130,000 15,000 .115,000 

Program adjustment to special capabilities new start ·115,000 

CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT 

137 DEVELOPMENT 240,213 179,713 ·60,500 

Electromc Warfare Test Capability - transfer to OT&E, 0 

line 3 ·60,500 

145 CLASSIFIED PROGRAM USD(P) 94,000 94,000 

Classified adjustment 94,000 

162 DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION 15,451 19,451 4,000 

Program adjustment 4.000 

INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT 

185 SUPPORT 14,000 10,000 -4,000 

Program adjustment -4,000 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS AVIATION SYSTEMS 

254 ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 156,561 142,868 ·13,693 

ESA for MC·130H • fiscal year 2013 delayed new start ·911 

C-130 TF radar system - early to need ·12,782 

271 SOF UNDERWATER SYSTEMS 18,325 19,481 1,156 

Transfer from P, OW line 69 1,156 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 3,773,704 3,638,964 ·134,740 

Classified adjustment ·134,740 
263 

HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES AND MINORITY- SERVING INSTITUTIONS

The Committee is encouraged that the Department of Defense is 

firmly committed to vigorous efforts with respect to Historically 

Black Colleges and Universities and Minority-Serving Institutions 

(HBCU/MI). The Committee is aware that the Assistant Secretary 

of Defense (Research and Engineering) issued guidance on December 2, 2011 calling for the reinvigoration of the relationship between the Department of Defense and the HBCU/MIs. 

Further, the Committee is concerned about the long-term development of the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics 

(STEM) workforce pipeline for underrepresented minorities, and 

notes the National Academy of Sciences’ recommendation that the 

federal government increase funding for undergraduate and graduate STEM programs focused on increasing the participation and 

success of minority students through engaged mentoring, enriching 

research experiences, and opportunities to publish, present, and 

network. Consistent with the report of the National Academy of 

Sciences ‘‘Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: 

America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads,’’ the 

Committee encourages the Department to emphasize STEM education improvement within the Historically Black Colleges and 

Universities and Minority Institutions program. Accordingly, the 

Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to consider these 

factors when awarding competitive funding under this program, as 

well as ensuring that selected programs have a sufficiently large 

cohort of students to allow for effective peer-to-peer mentoring, 

which has proven to be an effective model for ensuring the success 

of underrepresented minority students in the sciences. 

CONVENTIONAL PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE

The Committee recognizes the significance of having a Prompt 

Global Strike capability, and is aware of the successful test of the 

Army’s Advanced Hypersonic Weapon conducted on November 17, 

2011. Further, the Committee is aware that the planned use of 

over $200,000,000 of fiscal year 2013 funding is sufficient to conduct an additional test of the Conventional Prompt Global Strike 

capability. While the Committee understands the desire to have a 

possible sea-launched option, the Committee is also aware of the 

growing possibility of near-term threats. Therefore, the Committee 

encourages the Secretary of Defense to follow through on its stated 

intent regarding the fiscal year 2013 funding by expeditiously 

scheduling follow-on plans for a second flight test of the Army’s Advanced Hypersonic Weapon. 

CORROSION CONTROL

The Committee is encouraged by Department of Defense efforts 

to advance innovative, joint Service approaches to corrosion prevention and corrosion control, but remains concerned by the continued 

costs and impact of corrosion on military equipment and infrastructure. The Committee believes the use of a comprehensive, online 

repository consisting of advanced corrosion technical data, industry 

findings, and professional corrosion studies would strengthen existVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00273 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
264 

ing Department of Defense corrosion efforts, prevent unnecessary 

and duplicative single Service research pursuits, and generate significant cost savings across the military Services. Therefore, the 

Committee encourages the Director of the Office of Corrosion Policy 

and Oversight to develop a comprehensive, online corrosion analysis database, in collaboration with leading professional societies 

with expertise in the effects of corrosion, to support the Department’s Corrosion Prevention and Control Program. 

SPECIALTY METALS

The Committee applauds the Department of Defense for its 

March 2013 Final Rule to revise the definition of ‘‘produce’’ as it 

applies to specialty metals. This rule helps maintain a strong domestic armor steel plate industry and strengthens the defense industrial base, as well as the overall economic strength of the 

United States. The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense 

to continue to incentivize investment in the manufacturing capacity, process technology, research and development necessary to 

meet the needs of the U.S. military, thereby reducing the possibility of supply shortages. 

HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM

The Committee recognizes the importance of the Department of 

Defense’s ability to apply high performance computing to gain military superiority for the warfighter. The Committee also recognizes 

the importance of high performance computing in the broader defense scientific and technology community to enable faster and 

more capable processors designed to save energy and overcome 

speed barriers. Therefore, the Committee fully funds the fiscal year 

2014 request, and recommends a sustained modernization program 

at a level not less than the amount enacted for fiscal year 2012. 

MANUFACTURING EXPERIMENTATION AND OUTREACH

The Committee is encouraged by the progress of the Manufacturing Experimentation and Outreach program within the Defense 

Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (DARPA) Tactical Technology 

Office. This program engages high school-age students in a series 

of collaborative design and distributed manufacturing experiments 

by deploying up to a thousand computer-numerically-controlled 

manufacturing machines to high schools nationwide. The goal is to 

encourage students across clusters of schools to collaborate via social networking media to jointly design and build systems of moderate complexity, such as mobile robots, in response to prize challenges. In order to allow the greatest number of students to receive 

access to the most advanced manufacturing technology, the Committee urges the Director of DARPA to place a greater emphasis 

on technology that allows students to remotely access advanced 

cyber-enabled additive manufacturing equipment. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
265 

COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

The Committee recognizes the importance of the Missile Defense 

Agency’s new Common Kill Vehicle Technology program to consolidate the development of kill vehicles and to transition a discriminating kill vehicle to both Ground-based Interceptors and the 

Standard Missile–3. 

Although the Committee recognizes that the announcement of 

this new initiative occurred shortly before the budget submission, 

it is concerned with the lack of detailed justification materials and 

future plans and budgets for the program. 

Therefore, the Committee recommendation includes a transfer of 

$70,000,000, the amount requested for the program, from the Ballistic Missile Defense Technology line to create a new line specifically for the Common Kill Vehicle Technology program. This will 

allow for greater visibility and oversight of the program. 

The Committee also understands the importance of capitalizing 

on existing industrial base innovations, and urges the Director, 

Missile Defense Agency to fund risk reduction efforts for components such as the Divert and Attitude Control System. 

GROUND-BASED INTERCEPTORS

The Committee is concerned by the increasing military threat 

posed by North Korea. Evidence of this threat is present in North 

Korea’s three nuclear tests and, most recently, in the launch of several short range missiles. The Committee is aware that part of the 

response to this threat is to increase the number of Ground-based 

Interceptors (GBIs) fielded as part of the Ground-based Midcourse 

segment of the missile defense architecture. 

Despite the threat, the Committee is also concerned about the 

state of development and potential reliability of the GBI missiles. 

The test record of the GBI and associated sensors has been mixed, 

including a failed test in December 2010, and a successful test in 

January 2013. The Committee supports the strategic hedge these 

missiles provide, but believes that fielded equipment needs to be effective. Accordingly, the Committee directs the Department of Defense Inspector General to provide a report not later than 90 days 

after the enactment of this Act to the congressional defense committees which reviews the planned testing of the GBI program 

from fiscal year 2014 through fiscal year 2017. The report should 

comment on the adequacy of testing to ensure that the GBI missiles are reliable and effective. 

EMBEDDED DIAGNOSTICS

The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to fund joint 

government, university, and industry efforts to advance the technology and use of embedded diagnostics for unmanned aircraft. 

This improves safety by predicting future failures while simultaneously saving significant costs by eliminating the need for unnecessary overhaul and replacement of components. 

SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY

The Committee remains concerned about the state of defense 

microelectronics, with regard to both the availability of a trusted 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
266 

supply chain, as well as the long-term health and vitality of the industrial base. The Committee believes that actively engaging all 

accredited suppliers is important to maintaining this industrial 

base in the Trusted Foundry Program, which will be important for 

ensuring dependable, continuous long-term access to trusted mission critical semiconductors. The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to employ measures to ensure competition within 

the Trusted Foundry Program. 

OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $223,768,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 186,300,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 246,800,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +60,500,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the research, development, 

test and evaluation activities of the Department of Defense for defense-wide activities. The total amount recommended in the bill 

will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
267 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0171 80986A.170

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, . 

LIVE FIRE TESTING. 

OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES. 

TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .. 

TOTAL, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

75,720 75,720 

48 423 48.423 

62,157 122,657 +60 500 

186,300 246,800 +60,500 

186,300 246,800 +60,500 
268 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 0172 80986A.171

R-1 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSIS 

Electronic Warfare Test Capabihty - transfer from RDTE, 

OW line 137 

Budget 

Request 

62,157 

Committee 

Recommended 

122,657 

60,500 

Change from 

Request 

60,500 
(269) 

TITLE V 

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS 

DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $1,516,184,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 1,545,827,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 1,545,827,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. – – – 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,545,827,000 

for the Defense Working Capital Funds accounts. This funding supports the purchase of $25,158,000 for Army war reserve material, 

$61,731,000 for Air Force war reserve material, $46,428,000 for Defense Logistics Agency distribution services, and $1,412,510,000 for 

Defense Commissary Agency operations costs. 

NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $697,840,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 730,700,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 595,700,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥135,000,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the lease, operation, and 

supply of pre-positioning ships, operation of the Ready Reserve 

Force, and acquisition of ships for the Military Sealift Command, 

the Ready Reserve Force, and the Marine Corps. 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget 

request 

Committee recommended Change from 

request 

STRATEGIC SEALIFT ACQUISITION ............................................. 178,321 43,321 ¥135,000 

Afloat forward staging base—previously appropriated .. ¥135,000 – – – 

DoD MOBILIZATION ASSETS ....................................................... 197,296 197,296 – – – 

SEALIFT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ................................... 56,058 56,058 – – – 

READY RESERVE FORCE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ...... 299,025 299,025 – – – 

Total, National Defense Sealift Fund ..................... 30,700 595,700 ¥135,000 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(271) 

TITLE VI 

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $32,715,304,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 33,054,528,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 33,573,582,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +519,054,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for the Defense Health Program of the Department of Defense. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
272 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 173 80986A.172

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

IN-HOUSE CARE. 

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE, 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT. 

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT. 

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES. 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING. 

BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS. 

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 

PROCUREMENT 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 

RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 

TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

8,880,738 8,902,038 +21,300 

15,842,732 15,587,256 -255,476 

2.505.640 2,460,640 -45.000 

1,450,619 1,425,619 -25,000 

368,248 360.378 -7,870 

733 097 733,097 

1,872 660 2,097,660 +225,000 

31,653,734 31,566,688 -87,046 

671,181 671,181 

729,613 1,335,713 +606 100 

33,054,528 33,573,582 +519,054 
273 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 174 80986A.173

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

IN·HOUSE CARE 

Special Operation psychological resiliency ~ transfer from 

OM,DW 

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE 

TRICARE historical underexecution 

Pharmaceutical drugs excess growth 

Program adjustment to restore proposed increases 

Printing and reproduction excess growth 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT 

Historical underexecution 

Program increase - wounded warrior military adapative 

sports program 

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 

IT contract support services excess 

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 

Defense Acquisition Workforce excess growth 

Other services excess growth 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING 

BASE OPERATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 

Air Force FSRM for medica! facilities 

Army FSRM for medical facilities 

Navy FSRM for medical facilities 

PROCUREMENT 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 

A!r Force core research and development 

Peer-reviewed alcohol and substance abuse disorders 

research 

PeeHeviewed ALS research 

Peer-reviewed alzheimer research 

Peer-reviewed autism research 

Peer-reviewed bone marrow failure disease research 

Peer-reviewed breast cancer research 

Peer-reviewed cancer research 

Peer-reviewed Duchenne muscular dystrophy research 

Peer-reviewed gulf war illness research 

Peer-reviewed lung cancer research 

Peer-reviewed multiple sclerosis research 

Peer-reviewed orthopedic research 

Peer~reviewed ovarian cancer research 

Peer-reviewed prostate cancer research 

Peer-reviewed spinal cord research 

Peer-reviewed reconstructive transplant research 

Peer-reviewed traumatic brain injury and psychological 

health research 

PeeHeviewed tuberous sclerosis complex research 

Budget 

Request 

31,653,734 

8,880,738 

15,842,732 

2,505,640 

1,450,619 

368,248 

733,097 

1,872,660 

671,181 

729,613 

Committee 

Recommended 

31,566,688 

8,902,038 

21,300 

15,587,256 

-400,000 

-150,000 

297,000 

-2,476 

2,460,640 

-50,000 

5,000 

1,425,619 

-25,000 

360,378 

·956 

-6,914 

733,097 

2,097,660 

75,000 

75,000 

75,000 

671,181 

1,335,713 

18.700 

4,000 

7,500 

12,000 

6,000 

3,200 

120,000 

15,000 

3.200 

20,000 

10,500 

5,000 

30,000 

20,000 

80,000 

30,000 

15,000 

125,000 

6,000 

Change from 

Request 

·87,046 

21,300 

·255,476 

45,000 

·25,000 

·7,870 

225,000 

606,100 
274 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 175 80986A.174

Peer-reviewed vision research 

Global HIV/AIDS prevention 

HIVJAIDs program increase 

Joint w8rflghter medical research 

Trauma clinical research repository 

Budget 

Request 

Committee 

Recommended 

10,000 

8,000 

7,000 

45,000 

5,000 

Change from 

Request 
275 

REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR THE DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM

The Committee remains concerned regarding the transfer of 

funds from Direct (or In-House) Care to pay for contractor-provided 

medical care. To limit such transfers and improve oversight within 

the Defense Health Program operation and maintenance account, 

the Committee includes a provision which caps the funds available 

for Private Sector Care under the TRICARE program subject to 

prior approval reprogramming procedures. The provision and accompanying report language included by the Committee should not 

be interpreted as limiting the amount of funds that may be transferred to the Direct Care System from other budget activities within the Defense Health Program. In addition, the Committee continues to designate the funding for the Direct Care System as a 

congressional special interest item. Any transfer of funds from the 

Direct (or In-house) Care budget activity into the Private Sector 

Care budget activity or any other budget activity will require the 

Secretary of Defense to follow prior approval reprogramming procedures. 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide written notification to the congressional defense committees of cumulative transfers in excess of $15,000,000 out of the Private Sector 

Care budget activity. The Committee further directs the Assistant 

Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide quarterly reports 

to the congressional defense committees on budget execution data 

for all of the Defense Health Program accounts and to adequately 

reflect changes to the budget activities requested by the Services 

in future budget submissions. 

CARRYOVER

For fiscal year 2014, the Committee recommends one percent carryover authority for the operation and maintenance account of the 

Defense Health Program. The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to submit a detailed spending 

plan for any fiscal year 2013 designated carryover funds to the congressional defense committees not less than 30 days prior to executing the carryover funds. 

WALTER REED NATIONAL MILITARY MEDICAL CENTER AND FORT

BELVOIR COMMUNITY HOSPITAL

The military medical treatment facilities provide our servicemembers, retirees, and their families with world class healthcare. 

Nowhere is that more true than at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and the Fort Belvoir Community Hospital. 

However, the Committee is aware that for the last few years, the 

two hospitals in the National Capital Region have been underfunded in the base budget and have only remained solvent with 

mid-year and end-of-year funds that have become available from 

within the Defense Health Program appropriation. The Committee 

believes that the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) is 

fully committed to solving the underlying funding shortfall and understands that future funding levels will be re-baselined in order 

to protect the operations of these two flagship institutions. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
276 

EMBEDDED MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS

The Committee understands the tremendous toll exacted on all 

servicemembers and their families, including those in the special 

operations and National Guard and reserve communities, after 

more than a decade of war. The Committee has always made the 

care of forces and their families its highest priority. 

The Committee appreciates the focus that the Commander, Special Operations Command, has put on the psychological health and 

well-being of special operations forces and their families and recognizes the importance of providing support to this vulnerable population. 

Further, the Committee recognizes the success of the embedded 

behavioral health program and fully supports its expansion to the 

special operations community. However, the Committee believes 

that the mental health needs of all servicemembers, including special operators, are most appropriately addressed within the Defense 

Health Program by the Service Surgeons General to ensure the 

highest quality continuity of care for the servicemember. 

Therefore, the Committee recommendation transfers $21,300,000 

requested within the Special Operations Command operation and 

maintenance budget to the Defense Health Program to address the 

needs of the special operations community. The Committee directs 

the Service Surgeons General to work with the Commander, Special Operations Command to implement an embedded behavioral 

health program for special operations units during fiscal year 2014. 

The Committee also recognizes that National Guard and reserve 

personnel in states at high risk for suicide and dangerous behavioral health conditions need convenient access to mental health 

professionals for proper screening and care. Onsite access to embedded mental health specialists during training assemblies has 

proven successful in overcoming geographical, stigma, and time 

barriers that might otherwise bar a member from similar services 

in an underserved community. 

The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to work with 

the Chief, National Guard Bureau and Service Surgeons General to 

implement an embedded behavioral health program for National 

Guard and reserve component servicemembers in order to provide 

reserve component personnel with ready access to screening and 

treatment during unit training assemblies and urges the Secretary 

of Defense to robustly fund these programs. 

INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD

The Committee has grown increasingly frustrated with the inability of the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs to develop and procure an integrated electronic health record. Despite 

the mandate for full interoperability included in the fiscal year 

2008 National Defense Authorization Act, it was not until 2011 

that the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs committed to 

a plan to create a single integrated health record. Since that time, 

the two agencies have made halfhearted efforts to achieve that 

goal; however, earlier this year, the two Secretaries announced that 

they would no longer seek to create a single, common health 

record, instead falling back to the as-of-yet unattainable goal of 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
277 

interoperability. The Committee is dismayed at the lack of progress 

by the two Departments to achieve any kind of interoperability. 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit a report 

to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days 

after the enactment of this Act which provides the long-term way 

ahead for the program, an explanation of the anticipated future 

role, if any, of the joint Interagency Program Office, and the use 

of the funds spent to date by that office. 

JOINT WARFIGHTER MEDICAL RESEARCH PROGRAM

The Committee recommendation includes $45,000,000 for the 

continuation of the Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program. 

The funding shall be used to augment and accelerate high priority 

Department of Defense and Service medical requirements and to 

continue prior year initiatives that are close to achieving their objectives and yielding a benefit to military medicine. The funding 

shall not be used for new projects or for basic research, and it shall 

be awarded at the discretion of the Secretary of Defense following 

a review of medical research and development gaps as well as 

unfinanced medical requirements of the Services. Further, the 

Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide a report not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act to the congressional defense committees which 

lists the projects that receive funding. The report should include 

the funding amount awarded to each project, a thorough description of each project’s research, and the benefit the research will 

provide to the Department of Defense. 

PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE

The Committee remains concerned with pain management prescription medication dependency among servicemembers. It is imperative that proper steps are taken to prevent overmedication and 

that treatment options are available for those facing possible addiction. The Committee recognizes that the Department of Defense 

currently provides a range of Medication Therapy Management 

services at military treatment facilities. These services are designed to optimize therapy or the adherence to therapy between 

providers, pharmacists, and patients. The Committee directs the 

Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide a report 

not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act to the congressional defense committees detailing the progress of including 

pharmacists in the care team provided by the Patient Center Medical Home (PCMH), the success rate of patients in properly adhering to medicine treatment and prescription levels, and whether 

there have been cases in which the inclusion of a pharmacist in the 

PCMH has contributed to reducing the level of medication taken by 

patients who may have been overmedicating. 

PEER-REVIEWED CANCER RESEARCH PROGRAMS

The Committee recommendation includes $120,000,000 for the 

peer-reviewed breast cancer research program, $80,000,000 for the 

peer-reviewed prostate cancer research program, $20,000,000 for 

the peer-reviewed ovarian cancer research program, $10,500,000 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
278 

for the peer-reviewed lung cancer research program, and 

$15,000,000 for the peer-reviewed cancer research program that 

would research cancers not addressed in the aforementioned programs currently executed by the Department of Defense. 

The funds provided in the peer-reviewed cancer research program are directed to be used to conduct research in the following 

areas: blood cancer, colorectal cancer, genetic cancer research, kidney cancer, listeria vaccine for cancer, melanoma and other skin 

cancers, mesothelioma, pancreatic cancer, and pediatric brain tumors. 

The funds provided under the peer-reviewed cancer research program shall be used only for the purposes listed above. The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) 

to provide a report not later than 180 days after the enactment of 

this Act to the congressional defense committees on the status of 

the peer-reviewed cancer research program. For each research 

area, the report should include the funding amount awarded, the 

progress of the research, and the relevance of the research to 

servicemembers and their families. 

The Committee also encourages the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to establish a task force to focus on research 

for metastasized cancer of all types, with a focus on clinical and 

translational research aimed at extending the lives of advanced 

stage and recurrent patients. 

Further, the Committee also encourages the Assistant Secretary 

of Defense (Health Affairs) to fund cancer research that combines 

molecular data on cancer and non-cancer tissues with information 

regarding demographic and lifestyle factors that could influence 

treatment response. 

PEER-REVIEWED AUTISM RESEARCH PROGRAM

The Committee recommendation includes $6,000,000 for the 

peer-reviewed autism research program. The Committee is concerned that the increasing prevalence of autism could have an impact on the pool of potential candidates for military service and believes that a sustained research effort is necessary to find the causal agents of autism. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to support research 

within the peer-reviewed autism research program that seeks to 

understand possible environmental causes of autism spectrum disorders. 

PRE-DEPLOYMENT RESILIENCY TRAINING

The Committee commends the Army, with the support of the 

Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, and the Marine 

Corps, with the support of the Office of Naval Research and Naval 

Health Research Center, for studying innovative approaches to 

building mental resiliency and combating post-traumatic stress in 

servicemembers. The physiologically proven positive effects of 

skills-based resiliency training before deployment are encouraging 

in the continued effort to combat the onslaught of post-traumatic 

stress. The Committee encourages the Secretaries of the Army and 

the Navy to continue pursuing the implementation of skills-based 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
279 

resiliency training for all soldiers and Marines who are preparing 

for deployment. 

CHILDHOOD TRAUMA IN MILITARY DEPENDENTS

The Committee is concerned with the rise in outpatient mental 

health cases among children of active duty and reserve 

servicemembers. The Committee believes that it is imperative to 

develop efficient means to identify children at risk of deploymentrelated mental health issues and to provide tools, education, and 

guidance to the professionals and families caring for these children. 

It is also important that the proper steps are taken to prevent predictable mental health problems from manifesting in dependent 

children. The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to 

make the prevention of childhood trauma in military dependents a 

priority. 

AIR FORCE ACUITY MODEL TRAINING PROGRAM

The Committee understands that the Air Force Military Acuity 

Model has provided benefits such as more efficient and improved 

access to care. The Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary 

of Defense (Health Affairs) to consider expanding use of the model 

throughout the military health system. 

COOPERATION BETWEEN MILITARY MEDICAL FACILITIES, CIVILIAN

HEALTHCARE FACILITIES, AND UNIVERSITIES

The Committee recognizes the importance of cooperation between 

military medical facilities, universities, and other civilian partners 

to provide valuable medical trauma training to sustain the education of military medical providers. This training and real-life experience contributes to maintaining the capabilities of the National 

Guard Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Explosives 

Enhanced Response Force Packages, the National Guard Homeland 

Response Forces, and the Army Reserve Consequence Management 

Response Forces. 

The Committee encourages the Chiefs of the National Guard Bureau and the Army Reserve to continue to pursue trauma training 

with civilian partners in order to maintain unit medical readiness 

at optimum levels as military healthcare providers maintain their 

individual skills to respond effectively to emergency incidents. Additionally, in order to minimize civilian-military operational gaps 

and maximize interoperability in the event of a catastrophic incident, the Committee encourages the development of enhanced preparedness medical training programs focusing on mass casualty 

triage, disaster life support, hazardous material life support, and 

psychological health by maximizing civilian-based advanced trauma 

expertise gained through day-to-day experiences and medical research programs. 

THERMAL INJURY PREVENTION

The Committee commends the Secretary of Defense for establishing standards to prevent thermal injuries caused by aviation 

assets. However, recognizing that thermal injuries can also be 

caused by other equipment, the Committee encourages the SecVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00289 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
280 

retary of Defense to establish similar requirements for ground platforms. Survivability enhancement efforts such as fire prevention, 

fire suppression, and fuel containment should continually be addressed in order to provide the best possible protection. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a report not later 

than 180 days after the enactment of this Act to the congressional 

defense committees detailing a potential plan for implementation of 

thermal injury prevention requirements and standards on ground 

platforms. 

MENTAL HEALTH ACCESS FOR SERVICEMEMBERS

The Committee remains concerned with the ongoing stigma associated with servicemembers seeking assistance for mental and behavioral health issues. The Committee encourages the Assistant 

Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) and the Service Surgeons 

General to leverage all existing resources, within both military and 

civilian facilities, to provide comprehensive mental and behavioral 

health services to servicemembers and to continue efforts to reduce 

this stigma. 

MEDICAL RECORDS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS

The Committee supports actions taken by the Secretary of Defense to implement a policy for the retention of evidence and 

records relating to sexual assaults. The Committee believes that it 

is important for the Services to implement policies, procedures, and 

processes to ensure detailed evidence and records are maintained, 

as well as transmitted as appropriate, to the Department of Veterans Affairs. Record sharing between the two Departments should 

include any medical details of sexual assault victims that accurately describe the physical and emotional injuries resulting from 

a sexual trauma that occurred during active duty service. The 

Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to ensure that 

these important records are appropriately maintained and transferred, as required, to the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, 

DEFENSE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $1,301,786,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 1,057,123,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 1,057,123,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. – – – 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides for funds the Chemical Agents and 

Munitions Destruction activities of the Department of Defense. 

The Committee recommendation includes $1,057,123,000 for the 

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense program. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
281 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget 

Request 

Committee 

Recommended 

Change from 

Request 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .............................................................................. 451,572 451,572 – – – 

PROCUREMENT ........................................................................................................ 1,368 1,368 – – – 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION ............................................... 604,183 604,183 – – – 

TOTAL, CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE ......... 1,057,123 1,057,123 – – – 

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 

DEFENSE 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $1,159,263,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 938,545,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 1,007,762,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +69,217,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides funds for military personnel; operation and maintenance; procurement; and research, development, 

test and evaluation for drug interdiction and counter-drug activities of the Department of Defense to include activities related to 

narcoterrorism. 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget 

Request 

Committee Recommended Change from 

Request 

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES .......................................... 938,545 1,007,762 69,217 

National Guard counter-drug program .......................................................... 109,597 239,597 130,000 

Young Marines—drug demand reduction ..................................................... 4,000 – – – 

HQ Support to COCOMs growth ..................................................................... ¥1,500 – – – 

CN—Admin/Program Travel growth .............................................................. ¥1,553 – – – 

CN—Commercial Transportation growth ...................................................... ¥1,766 – – – 

CN—Supplies and Materials growth ............................................................ ¥3,304 – – – 

Previously funded RDTE projects ................................................................... ¥6,660 – – – 

Historical underobligation .............................................................................. ¥50,000 – – – 

NATIONAL GUARD STATE PLANS

The Committee recommendation includes $130,000,000 above the 

fiscal year 2014 request to supplement the National Guard 

Counter-Drug program. The Committee is dismayed that, for the 

second year in a row, the budget request woefully underfunds the 

National Guard Counter-Drug program, which recommends a nearly forty percent reduction from the fiscal year 2012 budget request 

and a nearly fifty percent reduction from the fiscal year 2012 enacted level. The Committee recognizes the importance of the mission of the National Guard Counter-Drug program as a support organization to combatant commands and federal, state, and local 

law enforcement agencies. Additionally, the National Guard 

Counter-Drug training centers provide invaluable training tools to 

soldiers, airmen, law enforcement agencies, and community-based 

personnel. The Committee designates the funding included in the 

budget request and the additional $130,000,000 as a congressional 

special interest item. Further, the Committee directs the Secretary 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
282 

of Defense to robustly fund the National Guard Counter-Drug program in subsequent budget years. 

SUPPORT OF COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES IN THE CARIBBEAN

The Committee remains concerned over the high level of violent 

crime in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The Committee 

notes that the homicide rate in each territory is significantly higher 

than any other U.S. jurisdiction and that many of these homicides 

are linked to the cross-border trade of illegal narcotics. The Committee further notes that data collected by federal law enforcement 

agencies appear to confirm that the U.S. territories in the Caribbean have become an increasingly attractive trans-shipment route 

for drug traffickers seeking to supply the U.S. mainland. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a report not later 

than 90 days after the enactment of this Act to the congressional 

defense committees on detection, monitoring, and other counterdrug activities the Department is undertaking, or intends to undertake, to support law enforcement operations in and around Puerto 

Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... – – – 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... $98,800,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. – – – 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥98,800,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommends no funding for the Joint Urgent 

Operational Needs Fund. 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $350,321,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 312,131,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 347,000,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +34,869,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

The Committee recommendation includes $347,000,000 for the 

Office of the Inspector General. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2014: 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommended 

Change from 

request 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .............................................................................. 311,131 346,000 34,869 

Program increase 34,869 – – – 

PROCUREMENT ........................................................................................................ 1,000 1,000 – – – 

TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL ................................................ 312,131 347,000 34,869 

INSPECTOR GENERAL VACANCY

The Committee is concerned by the ongoing vacancy of the Department of Defense Inspector General position. This position has 

been vacant since December 2011, and while the position is being 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
283 

filled temporarily by the Acting Inspector General, no successor has 

been nominated during that time period. The Inspector General is 

responsible for conducting audits and investigations, informing 

Congress and the Secretary of Defense on programs and deficiencies, and acting as the principal adviser to the Secretary of Defense for matters relating to the prevention and detection of fraud, 

waste, and abuse. As the Department faces a climate of reduced 

budgets and ongoing challenges, a Senate-confirmed Inspector General is critical to providing the oversight needed to reduce waste 

and ensure taxpayers dollars are spent wisely and efficiently. The 

Committee urges the Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the 

President, to identify and submit a highly qualified nominee to be 

the Department of Defense Inspector General as soon as possible. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(285) 

TITLE VII 

RELATED AGENCIES 

NATIONAL AND MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 

The National Intelligence Program and the Military Intelligence 

Program budgets funded in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act consist primarily of resources for the Director of National 

Intelligence including the Intelligence Community Management 

Staff, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Reconnaissance Office, the National 

Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the 

intelligence services of the Departments of the Army, Navy, Air 

Force, and the CIA Retirement and Disability fund. 

CLASSIFIED ANNEX

The Committee’s budget reviews are published in a separate, detailed, and comprehensive classified annex. The intelligence community, Department of Defense, and other organizations are expected to fully comply with the recommendations and directions in 

the classified annex accompanying the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014. 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY RETIREMENT AND 

DISABILITY SYSTEM FUND 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $514,000,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 514,000,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 514,000,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. – – – 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 

This appropriation provides payments of benefits to qualified 

beneficiaries in accordance with the Central Intelligence Agency 

Retirement Act of 1964 for Certain Employees (P.L. 88–643), as 

amended by Public Law 94–522. This statute authorized the establishment of the CIA Retirement and Disability System for certain 

employees and authorized the establishment and maintenance of a 

fund from which benefits would be paid to those beneficiaries. 

The Committee recommends the budget request of $514,000,000 

for the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System fund. This is a mandatory account. 

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 

Fiscal year 2013 appropriation * ....................................................... $534,421,000 

Fiscal year 2014 budget request ....................................................... 568,271,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 552,535,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. ¥15,736,000 

* FY13 Enacted level does not include the 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
286 

The Committee recommendation includes $552,535,000, which is 

a decrease of $15,736,000 below the budget request for the Intelligence Community Management Account. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(287) 

TITLE VIII 

GENERAL PROVISIONS 

The accompanying bill includes 126 general provisions. Most of 

these provisions were included in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2013 and many have been included 

in the Defense Appropriations Acts for a number of years. A description of each provision follows. 

Section 8001 provides that no funds made available in this Act 

may be used for publicity or propaganda purposes not authorized 

by Congress. 

Section 8002 provides for conditions and limitations on the payment of compensation to, or employment of, foreign nationals. 

Section 8003 provides that no funds made available in this Act 

may be obligated beyond the end of the fiscal year unless expressly 

provided for a greater period of availability elsewhere in this Act. 

Section 8004 provides a 20 percent limitation on the obligation 

of certain funds provided in this Act during the last two months 

of the fiscal year. 

Section 8005 has been amended and provides for the general 

transfer authority of working capital funds to other military functions. 

Section 8006 provides that the tables titled ‘‘Explanation of 

Project Level Adjustments’’ in the explanatory statement and classified annex shall be carried out in the manner provided by the tables to the same extent as if the tables were included in the text 

of this Act. 

Section 8007 provides for the establishment of a baseline for application of reprogramming and transfer authorities for the current 

fiscal year. 

Section 8008 provides for limitations on the use of transfer authority of working capital fund cash balances. 

Section 8009 provides that none of the funds appropriated in this 

Act may be used to initiate a special access program without prior 

notification to the congressional defense committees. 

Section 8010 has been amended and provides limitations and 

conditions on the use of funds made available in this Act to initiate 

multi-year contracts. 

Section 8011 provides for the use and obligation of funds for humanitarian and civic assistance costs under chapter 20 of title 10, 

United States Code. 

Section 8012 has been amended and provides that civilian personnel of the Department of Defense may not be managed on the 

basis of end strength or be subject to end strength limitations. 

Section 8013 prohibits funding from being used to influence congressional action on any matters pending before the Congress. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
288 

Section 8014 prohibits compensation from being paid to any 

member of the Army who is participating as a full-time student 

and who receives benefits from the Education Benefits Fund when 

time spent as a full-time student is counted toward that member’s 

service commitment. 

Section 8015 provides for the transfer of funds appropriated in 

title III of this Act for the Department of Defense Pilot MentorProte ́ge ́ Program. 

Section 8016 provides for the Department of Defense to purchase 

anchor and mooring chains manufactured only in the United 

States. 

Section 8017 has been amended and makes permanent the prohibition of funds made available to the Department of Defense from 

being used to demilitarize or dispose of certain surplus firearms 

and small arms ammunition or ammunition components. 

Section 8018 provides a limitation on funds being used for the relocation of any Department of Defense entity into or within the National Capital Region. 

Section 8019 provides for incentive payments authorized by section 504 of the Indian Financing Act of 1974 (25 U.S.C. 1544). 

Section 8020 provides that no funding for the Defense Media Activity may be used for national or international political or psychological activities. 

Section 8021 provides for the obligation of funds for purposes 

specified in section 2350j(c) of title 10, United States Code, in anticipation of receipt of contributions from the Government of Kuwait. 

Section 8022 has been amended and provides funding for the 

Civil Air Patrol Corporation. 

Section 8023 has been amended and prohibits funding from being 

used to establish new Department of Defense Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDC), with certain limitations 

and reduces funding provided for FFRDCs. 

Section 8024 provides for the Department of Defense to procure 

carbon, alloy, or armor steel plate melted and rolled only in the 

United States and Canada. 

Section 8025 defines the congressional defense committees as 

being the Armed Services Committees of the House and Senate and 

the Subcommittees on Defense of the Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate. 

Section 8026 provides for competitions between private firms and 

Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Activities for modification, depot maintenance, and repair of aircraft, vehicles, and vessels as well as the production of components and other Defense-related articles. 

Section 8027 has been amended and provides for revocation of 

blanket waivers of the Buy American Act upon a finding that a 

country has violated a reciprocal defense procurement memorandum of understanding by discriminating against products produced in the United States that are covered by the agreement. 

Section 8028 provides for the availability of funds contained in 

the Department of Defense Overseas Military Facility Investment 

Recovery Account for purposes specified in section 2921(c)(2) of the 

1991 National Defense Authorization Act. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
289 

Section 8029 provides for the conveyance, without consideration, 

of relocatable housing units that are excess to the needs of the Air 

Force located at Grand Forks Air Force Base, Malmstrom Air Force 

Base, Mountain Home Air Force Base, Ellsworth Air Force Base, 

and Minot Air Force Base to Indian Tribes located in the states of 

Nevada, Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Oregon, 

Minnesota, and Washington. 

Section 8030 provides authority to use operation and maintenance appropriations to purchase items having an investment item 

unit cost of not more than $250,000. 

Section 8031 has been amended and prohibits the use of working 

capital funds to purchase specified investment items. 

Section 8032 has been amended and provides that none of the 

funds appropriated for the Central Intelligence Agency shall remain available for obligation beyond the current fiscal year except 

for funds appropriated for the Reserve for Contingencies, the working capital fund, or other programs as specified. 

Section 8033 provides that funds available for the Defense Intelligence Agency may be used for the design, development, and deployment of General Defense Intelligence Program intelligence 

communications and intelligence information systems. 

Section 8034 provides for the availability of funds for the mitigation of environmental impacts on Indian lands resulting from Department of Defense activities. 

Section 8035 requires the Department of Defense to comply with 

the Buy American Act, chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code. 

Section 8036 provides conditions under which contracts for studies, analyses, or consulting services may be entered into without 

competition on the basis of an unsolicited proposal. 

Section 8037 places certain limitations on the use of funds made 

available in this Act to establish Field Operating Agencies. 

Section 8038 is a new provision and provides grant authorities 

for the Department of Defense acting through the Office of Economic Adjustment. 

Section 8039 places restrictions on converting to contractor performance an activity or function of the Department of Defense unless it meets certain guidelines provided. 

(RESCISSIONS)

Section 8040 has been amended and provides for the rescission 

of $3,043,571,000 from the following programs: 

2011 Appropriations: 

National Defense Sealift Fund: 

Strategic sealift acquisition .................................. $28,000,000 

2012 Appropriations: 

National Defense Sealift Fund: 

Strategic sealift acquisition .................................. 14,000,000 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy: 

E–2D ....................................................................... 30,000,000 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force: 

C–27J Joint Cargo aircraft ................................... 443,000,000 

Missile Procurement, Air Force: 

Classified programs ............................................... 10,000,000 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
290 

2013 Appropriations: 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy: 

E–2D ....................................................................... 35,000,000 

MH–60R ................................................................. 50,000,000 

Weapons Procurement, Navy: 

Aerial targets ......................................................... 5,000,000 

Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy: 

Completion of prior year shipbuilding programs 

(CVN–71) ............................................................ 68,000,000 

Other Procurement, Navy: 

LCS MCM mission packages (OASIS termination) ..................................................................... 3,553,000 

Procurement, Marine Corps: 

Follow-on to SMAW ............................................... 12,650,000 

Missile Procurement, Air Force: 

Classified programs ............................................... 60,000,000 

Other Procurement, Air Force: 

COMSEC equipment ............................................. 38,900,000 

Procurement, Defense-Wide: 

Classified programs ............................................... 10,000,000 

SOF U–28 ............................................................... 62,776,000 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army: 

MEADS ................................................................... 380,861,000 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy: 

Airborne mine countermeasures ........................... 13,028,000 

H–1 series ............................................................... 18,111,000 

Manned reconnaissance systems .......................... 18,192,000 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force: 

Classified programs ............................................... 115,000,000 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, DefenseWide: 

Classified programs ............................................... 90,000,000 

Precision Tracking Space System ......................... 123,000,000 

Ship Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment Fund: 

Ship Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment Fund .......................................................... 1,414,500,000 

Section 8041 prohibits funds made available in this Act from 

being used to reduce authorized positions for military technicians 

(dual status) of the Army National Guard, Air National Guard, 

Army Reserve, and Air Force Reserve unless such reductions are 

a direct result of a reduction in military force structure. 

Section 8042 prohibits funding from being obligated or expended 

for assistance to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea unless 

specifically appropriated for that purpose. 

Section 8043 provides for reimbursement to the National Guard 

and reserve when members of the National Guard and reserve provide intelligence or counterintelligence support to the combatant 

commands, Defense agencies, and joint intelligence activities. 

Section 8044 prohibits funds from being used to reduce civilian 

medical and medical support personnel assigned to military treatment facilities below the September 30, 2003 level unless the Service Surgeons General certify to the congressional defense committees that it is a responsible stewardship of resources to do so. 

Section 8045 prohibits the transfer of Department of Defense and 

Central Intelligence Agencies drug interdiction and counter-drug 

activity funds to other agencies except as specifically provided in 

an appropriations law. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
291 

Section 8046 prohibits funding from being used for the procurement of ball and roller bearings other than those produced by a domestic source and of domestic origin. 

Section 8047 prohibits funding from being used to purchase 

supercomputers which are not manufactured in the United States. 

Section 8048 prohibits funding made available in this or any 

other Act from being used to pay the salary of anyone who approves or implements a transfer of administrative responsibilities 

or budgetary resources of any program, project, or activity financed 

by this Act to the jurisdiction of another federal agency not financed by this Act without express authorization of the Congress. 

Section 8049 provides for prior Congressional notification of article or service transfers to international peacekeeping organizations. 

Section 8050 prohibits funding from being used for contractor bonuses being paid due to business restructuring. 

Section 8051 provides for the transfer of funds to appropriations 

available for pay of military personnel in connection with support 

and services for eligible organizations and activities outside the Department of Defense. 

Section 8052 provides for the Department of Defense to dispose 

of negative unliquidated or unexpended balances for expired or 

closed accounts. 

Section 8053 provides conditions for the use of equipment of the 

National Guard Distance Learning Project on a space-available, reimbursable basis. 

Section 8054 provides for the availability of funds to implement 

cost-effective agreements for required heating facility modernization in the Kaiserslautern Military Community, Landstuhl Army 

Regional Medical Center, and Ramstein Air Base, Germany. 

Section 8055 provides for the limitation on the use of funds appropriated in title IV to procure end-items for delivery to military 

forces for operational training, operational use or inventory requirements. 

Section 8056 provides for a waiver of ‘‘Buy America’’ provisions 

for certain cooperative programs. 

Section 8057 prohibits funding from being used to support the 

training of members of foreign security forces who have engaged in 

gross violations of human rights. 

Section 8058 prohibits funding in this Act from being used for repairs or maintenance to military family housing units. 

Section 8059 provides obligation authority for new starts for advanced concept technology demonstration projects only after notification to the congressional defense committees. 

Section 8060 provides that the Secretary of Defense shall provide 

a classified quarterly report on certain matters as directed in the 

classified annex accompanying this Act. 

Section 8061 prohibits the use of funds made available to the Department of Defense to provide support to an agency that is more 

than 90 days in arrears in making payments to the Department of 

Defense for goods or services provided on a reimbursable basis. 

Section 8062 provides for the use of National Guard personnel to 

support ground-based elements of the National Ballistic Missile Defense System. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
292 

Section 8063 prohibits the use of funds made available in this 

Act to transfer to any non-governmental entity ammunition held by 

the Department of Defense that has a center-fire cartridge and is 

designated as ‘‘armor piercing’’ except for demilitarization purposes. 

Section 8064 provides for a waiver by the Chief of the National 

Guard Bureau or his designee for all or part of consideration in 

cases of personal property leases of less than one year. 

Section 8065 provides for a limitation on funding from being used 

to support non-appropriated funds that purchase alcoholic beverages. 

Section 8066 has been amended and provides for the transfer of 

funds made available in this Act under Operation and Maintenance, Army to other activities of the federal government for classified purposes. 

Section 8067 has been amended and provides for the forced 

matching of disbursements and obligations made by the Department of Defense in the current fiscal year. 

Section 8068 provides for the transfer of funds made available in 

this Act under Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide to the 

Department of State Global Security Contingency Fund. 

Section 8069 provides grant authority for the construction and 

furnishing of additional Fisher Houses to meet the needs of military family members when confronted with the illness or hospitalization of an eligible military beneficiary. 

Section 8070 has been amended and provides funding and transfer authority for the Israeli Cooperative Programs. 

Section 8071 prohibits funding from being obligated to modify 

command and control relationships to give Fleet Forces Command 

operational and administrative control of U.S. Navy forces assigned 

to the Pacific Fleet or to give United States Transportation Command operational and administrative control of certain aircraft. 

Section 8072 has been amended and provides for the funding of 

prior year shipbuilding cost increases. 

Section 8073 has been amended and provides that funds made 

available in this Act for intelligence activities are deemed to be specifically authorized by Congress for purposes of section 504 of the 

National Security Act of 1947 until the enactment of the Intelligence Authorization Act for the current fiscal year. 

Section 8074 prohibits funding from being used to initiate a new 

start program without prior written notification. 

Section 8075 provides that the budget of the President for the 

subsequent fiscal year shall include separate budget justification 

documents for costs of the United States Armed Forces’ participation in contingency operations for the military personnel, operation 

and maintenance, and procurement accounts. 

Section 8076 prohibits funding from being used for the research, 

development, test, evaluation, procurement, or deployment of nuclear armed interceptors of a missile defense system. 

Section 8077 provides the Secretary of Defense with the authority to make grants in the amounts specified. 

Section 8078 prohibits funding from being used to reduce or disestablish the operation of the 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron of the Air Force Reserve. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
293 

Section 8079 prohibits funding from being used for the integration of foreign intelligence information unless the information has 

been lawfully collected and processed during conduct of authorized 

foreign intelligence activities. 

Section 8080 provides that at the time members of reserve components of the Armed Forces are called or ordered to active duty, 

each member shall be notified in writing of the expected period 

during which the member will be mobilized. 

Section 8081 provides that the Secretary of Defense may transfer 

funds from any available Department of the Navy appropriation 

under certain conditions to any available Navy ship construction 

appropriation to liquidate costs caused by rate adjustments or 

other economic factors. 

Section 8082 provides for the use of current and expired Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy subdivisions to reimburse the Judgment Fund. 

Section 8083 prohibits funding from being used to transfer program authority relating to current tactical unmanned aerial vehicles from the Army and requires the Army to retain responsibility 

for and operational control of the MQ–1C Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. 

Section 8084 provides funding under certain conditions for the 

Asia Pacific Regional Initiative Program for the purpose of enabling 

the Pacific Command to execute certain Theater Security Cooperation activities. 

Section 8085 has been amended and limits the availability of 

funding provided for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence beyond the current fiscal year, except for funds appropriated for research and technology, which shall remain available 

for the current and the following fiscal years. 

Section 8086 provides for the adjustment of obligations within 

the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy appropriation. 

Section 8087 has been amended and provides for the establishment of a baseline for application of reprogramming and transfer 

authorities for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for 

the current fiscal year. 

Section 8088 provides for the transfer of funds by the Director 

of National Intelligence to other departments and agencies for the 

purposes of government-wide information sharing activities. 

Section 8089 provides for limitations on funding provided for the 

National Intelligence Program to be available for obligation or expenditure through a reprogramming or transfer of funds in accordance with section 102A(d) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 

U.S.C. 403–1(d)). 

Section 8090 directs the Director of National Intelligence to submit a future-years intelligence program reflecting estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations. 

Section 8091 defines the congressional intelligence committees as 

being the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

House, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, and the 

Subcommittees on Defense of the Committees on Appropriations of 

the House and Senate. 

Section 8092 has been amended and directs the Department of 

Defense to continue to report incremental contingency operations 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
294 

costs for Operation Enduring Freedom or any other named operations in the U.S. Central Command area of operation on a monthly basis in the Cost of War Execution Report as required by Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation. 

Section 8093 provides the authority to transfer funding from operation and maintenance accounts for the Army, Navy, and Air 

Force to the central fund for Fisher Houses and Suites. 

Section 8094 has been amended and provides that funds appropriated in this Act may be available for the purpose of making remittances and transfers to the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. 

Section 8095 provides that any agency receiving funds made 

available in this Act shall post on a public website any report required to be submitted by Congress with certain exceptions. 

Section 8096 prohibits the use of funds for federal contracts in 

excess of $1,000,000 unless the contractor agrees not to require, as 

a condition of employment, that employees or independent contractors agree to resolve through arbitration any claim or tort related 

to, or arising out of, sexual assault or harassment, including assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false 

imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or retention, and to 

certify that each covered subcontractor agrees to do the same. 

Section 8097 prohibits funding to the Association of Community 

Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) or its subsidiaries. 

Section 8098 has been amended and provides funds for transfer 

to the Joint Department of Defense—Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund. 

Section 8099 prohibits the Office of the Director of National Intelligence from employing more Senior Executive employees than 

are specified in the classified annex. 

Section 8100 prohibits funding from being used to pay a retired 

general or flag officer to serve as a senior mentor advising the Department of Defense unless such retired officer files a Standard 

Form 278 or successor form. 

Section 8101 provides for the purchase of heavy and light armed 

vehicles for the physical security of personnel or for force protection 

purposes up to a limit of $250,000 per vehicle. 

Section 8102 has been amended and provides grants through the 

Office of Economic Adjustment to support critical existing and enduring military installations on Guam, as well as Department of 

Defense growth. 

Section 8103 prohibits the Secretary of Defense from taking beneficial occupancy of more than 2,500 parking spaces to be provided 

by the BRAC 133 project unless certain conditions are met. 

Section 8104 has been amended and requires monthly reporting 

of the civilian personnel end strength by appropriation account to 

the congressional defense committees. 

Section 8105 has been amended and prohibits funding to separate the National Intelligence Program budget from, or to consolidate within, the Department of Defense budget. 

Section 8106 has been amended and provides the Director of National Intelligence with general transfer authority with certain limitations. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
295 

Section 8107 prohibits funding to transfer or release any individual detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba into the United States, 

its territories, or possessions. This language is identical to language enacted in Public Law 112–74. 

Section 8108 has been amended and prohibits funding to transfer 

any individual detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to a country of 

origin or other foreign country or entity unless the Secretary of Defense makes certain certifications. This language is similar to language enacted in Public Law 112–239. 

Section 8109 prohibits funding to modify any United States facility (other than the facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba) to house any 

individual detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This language is 

identical to language enacted in Public Law 112–74. 

Section 8110 prohibits funding from being used to enter into contracts or agreements with corporations with unpaid tax liabilities. 

Section 8111 prohibits funding from being used to enter into contracts or agreements with a corporation that was convicted of a federal criminal violation in the past 24 months. 

Section 8112 prohibits funding from being used to violate the 

Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000. 

Section 8113 prohibits funding from being used to violate the 

Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008. 

Section 8114 prohibits funding from being used to violate the 

War Powers Resolution Act. 

Section 8115 has been amended and requires the Secretary of the 

Air Force to obligate and expend funds previously appropriated for 

the procurement of RQ–4B Global Hawk aircraft. 

Section 8116 has been amended and reduces the amount available for pay for civilian personnel. 

Section 8117 prohibits funds from being used to purchase or 

lease new light duty vehicles except in accordance with the Presidential Memorandum-Federal Fleet Performance. 

Section 8118 prohibits funds from being used to enter into a contract with a person or entity listed in the Excluded Parties List 

System/System for Award Management as having been convicted of 

fraud against the Federal Government. 

Section 8119 is a new provision and prohibits funds from being 

used to enter into a contract, memorandum of understanding, or cooperative agreement with, make a grant to, or provide a loan or 

loan guarantee to Rosoboronexport, except under certain conditions. 

Section 8120 is a new provision and strikes paragraph 7 of Section 8159(c) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 

2001. 

Section 8121 is a new provision and prohibits the use of funds 

for the purchase of manufacture of a United States flag unless such 

flags are treated as covered items under section 2533a(b) of title 

10, United States Code. 

Section 8122 is a new provision and provides $25 million for purposes of implementation of a Sexual Assault Special Victims Program. 

Section 8123 is a new provision and prohibits the use of funds 

in contravention of the amendments made to the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice in subtitle D of title V of the pending National DeVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00305 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
296 

fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 regarding the discharge or dismissal of a member of the Armed Forces convicted of 

certain sex-related offenses, the required trial of such offenses by 

general courts-martial, and the limitations imposed on convening 

authority discretion regarding court-martial findings and sentence. 

Section 8124 is a new provision and prohibits the use of funds 

for certain activities in Afghanistan. 

Section 8125 is a new provision and prohibits terminating certain 

programs without prior Congressional approval. Section 8126 is a new provision and provides $580,000,000 to 

fully fund an increase in basic pay for all military personnel by 1.8 

percent as authorized by current law, effective January 1, 2014. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(297) 

TITLE IX 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

In title IX the Committee recommends total new appropriations 

of $85,768,949,000. A detailed review of the Committee recommendation for programs funded in this title is provided in the 

following pages. 

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to continue to report incremental contingency operations costs for Operation Enduring Freedom on the monthly basis in the Cost of War Execution report as required by Department of Defense Financial Management 

Regulation, Chapter 23, Volume 12. Further, the Committee directs 

the Secretary of Defense to report the incremental contingency operations costs for any and all new named operations that may have 

commenced in the Central Command Area of Responsibility on a 

monthly basis in the Cost of War Execution report as required by 

Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, Chapter 

23, Volume 12. The Committee further directs the Secretary of Defense to continue providing Cost of War reports to the congressional defense committees that include the following information by 

appropriation account: funding appropriated, funding allocated, 

monthly obligations, monthly disbursements, cumulative fiscal year 

obligations, and cumulative fiscal year disbursements. 

The Committee expects that in order to meet unanticipated requirements, funds may need to be transferred within these appropriations accounts for purposes other than those specified in this 

report. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to follow 

normal prior approval reprogramming procedures should it be necessary to transfer funding between different appropriations accounts in this title. 

MILITARY PERSONNEL 

The Committee recommends an additional appropriation of 

$9,644,798,000 for Military Personnel. 

The Committee recommendation for each military personnel account is shown below: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
298 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 176 80986A.175

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

M·l Request Recommended Request 

BA·l: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

BASIC PAY 864,052 864,052 

RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 238,058 238,058 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 271,092 271,092 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 34,598 34,598 

INCENTIVE PAYS 5,126 5,126 

SPECIAL PAYS 38,486 38,486 

ALLOWANCES 19,132 19,132 

SEPARATION PAY 88,861 88,861 

SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 65,940 65,940 

TOTAL, BA·l 1,625,351 1,625,351 

BA·2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED 

BASIC PAY 1,925,501 1,925,501 

RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 543,288 543,288 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 763,796 763,796 

INCENTIVE PAYS 2,427 2,427 

SPECIAL PAYS 176,568 176,568 

ALLOWANCES 110,227 110,227 

SEPARATION PAY 180,281 180,287 

SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 141,361 147,361 

TOTAL, BA·2 3,849,455 3,849,455 

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 251,345 251,345 

SUBSISTENCE·IN·KIND 500,504 460,004 -40,500 

Projected underexecution -40,500 

TOTAL, BA-4 151,849 711,349 

BA·5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL 

ACCESSION TRAVEL 11,091 11,091 

TRAINING TRAVEL 8,926 8,926 

OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 105,220 103,498 ·1,722 

pes Efficiency -1,722 

ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 54,677 52,390 ·2,287 

pes Efficiency -2,287 

SEPARATION TRAVEL 14,169 14,169 

TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS 622 622 

TOTAL, BA-5 194,105 190,696 

BA·6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS 

INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS 4,745 4,745 

DEATH GRATUITIES 7,449 7,449 

UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 204,833 204,833 

RESERVE INCOME REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 40 40 

SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS 73,261 73,261 

TRAUMATIC INJURY PROTECTION COVERAGE 35,827 35,827 

TOTAL, BA-5 326,155 326,155 

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY 6,747,515 6,703,006 -44,509 
299 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 177 80986A.176

Budget Committee Change from 

M-l Request Recommended Request 

BA-l: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

BASIC PAY 99,067 99,067 

RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 24,271 24,271 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 31,959 31,959 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 3,427 3,427 

INCENTIVE PAYS 749 749 

SPECIAL PAYS 4,858 4,858 

ALLOWANCES 7,458 7,458 

SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 7,579 7,579 

TOTAL, BA-l 179,368 179,368 

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED 

BASIC PAY 108,938 108,938 

RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 26,690 26,690 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 51,780 51,780 

INCENTIVE PAYS 296 296 

SPECIAL PAYS 11,931 11,931 

ALLOWANCES 16,447 16,447 

SEPARATION PAY 179 179 

SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 8,334 8,334 

TOTAL, BA-2 224,595 224,595 

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 12,359 12,359 

SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 22,956 22,956 

TOTAL, BA-4 35,315 35,315 

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL 

ACCESSIDN TRAVEL 3,071 3,071 

OPERATIDNAL TRAVEL 1,353 1,353 

RDTATIONAL TRAVEL 2,559 2,559 

SEPARATION TRAVEL 4,472 4,472 

TOTAL, BA-5 11,455 11,455 

BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS 

DEATH GRATUITIES 1,200 1,200 

UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 62,168 62,168 

SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS 44,243 44,243 

TOTAL, BA-6 107,611 107,611 

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY 558,344 558,344 

BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

BASIC PAY 143,065 143,065 

RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 41,321 41,321 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 48,408 48,408 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 6,073 6,073 

SPECIAL PAYS 4,120 4,120 

ALLOWANCES 4,155 4,155 

SEPARATION PAY 43,118 43,118 

SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 10,937 10,937 

TOTAL, BA-1 301,197 301,197 

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED 

BASIC PAY 267,486 267,486 

RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 81,344 81,344 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 89,578 89,578 

SPECIAL PAYS 25,141 25,141 
300 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 178 80986A.177

Budget Committee Change from 

M·l Request Recommended Request 

ALLOWANCES 16,905 16,905 

SEPARATION PAY 78,956 78,956 

SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 20,463 20,463 

TOTAL, BA-2 579,873 579,873 

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 45,965 45,965 

TOTAL, BA-4 45,965 45,965 

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL 

ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 19,481 19,481 

SEPARATION TRAVEL 4,371 4,371 

TOTAL, BA-5 23,852 23,852 

BA·6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS 

INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS 930 930 

DEATH GRATUITIES 7,000 7,000 

UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 37,733 37,733 

SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS 22,772 22,772 

TOTAL, BA-6 68,435 68,435 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

BASIC PAY 131,007 131,007 

RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 32,097 32,097 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 39,926 39,926 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 4,696 4,696 

SPECIAL PAYS 7,394 7,394 

ALLOWANCES 8,449 8,449 

SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 10,022 10,022 

TOTAL, BA-1 233,591 233,591 

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED 

BASIC PAY 229,591 229,591 

RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 56,250 56,250 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 95,564 95,564 

SPECIAL PAYS 29,262 29,262 

ALLOWANCES 25,480 25,480 

SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 17,564 17,564 

TOTAL, BA·2 453,711 453,711 

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 24,177 24,177 

SUBSISTENCE·IN·KIND 72,502 72,502 

TOTAL, BA-4 96,679 96,679 

BA·5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL 

OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 4,003 4,003 

TOTAL, BA-5 4,003 4,003 

BA·6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS 

DEATH GRATUITIES 600 600 

UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 28,841 28,841 

SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS 49,662 49,662 

TOTAL, BA·6 79,103 79,103 

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 867,087 867,087 
301 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 179 80986A.178

Budget Committee Change from 

M·1 Request Recommended Request 

BA·l: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING 

PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and DRILLS 24148) 10,494 10,494 

SPECIAL TRAINING 30,458 30,458 

TOTAL, BA·l 40,952 40,952 

TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY 40,952 40,952 

BA·l: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING 

SCHOOL TRAINING 1,753 1,753 

SPECIAL TRAINING 18,100 18,100 

ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 385 385 

TOTAL, BA·1 20,238 20,238 

TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY 20,238 20,238 

BA·1: UNIT AND INDIVIOUAL TRAINING 

SCHOOL TRAINING 3,213 3,213 

SPECIAL TRAINING 11,679 11,679 

ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 242 242 

TOTAL, BA·1 15,134 15,134 

TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 15,134 15,134 

BA·l: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING 

SPECIAL TRAINING 20,432 20,432 

TOTAL, BA·l 20,432 20,432 

TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 20,432 20,432 

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY 

BA·1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING 

PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and DRILLS 24148) 50,638 50,638 

SCHOOL TRAINING 19,444 19,444 

SPECIAL TRAINING 286,096 286,096 

ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 37,186 37,186 

TOTAL, BA·l 393,364 393,364 

TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY 393,364 393,364 

BA·l: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING 

SPECIAL TRAINING 6,919 6,919 

TOTAL, BA·l 6,919 6,919 

TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 6,919 6,919 
302 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

The Committee recommends an additional appropriation of 

$66,146,211,000 for Operation and Maintenance. 

The Committee recommendation for each operation and maintenance account is shown below: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
303 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 180 80986A.179

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

0-1 Request Recommended Request 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

111 MANUEVER UNITS 217,571 217,571 

112 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 8,266 8,266 

113 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 56,626 56,626 

114 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 4,209,942 4,209,942 

115 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 950,567 950,567 

116 AVIATION ASSETS 474,288 474,288 

121 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,349,152 1,349,152 

122 LAND FORCES FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 655,000 655,000 

123 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 301,563 651,563 350,000 

Program increase 350,000 

131 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 706,214 706,214 

135 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES 11,519,498 11,519,498 

136 COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM 60,000 60,000 

137 RESET 2,240,358 3,540,358 1,300,000 

Program increase 1,300,000 

411 SECURITY PROGRAMS 1,402,994 1,402,994 

421 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 4,601,356 4,601,356 

424 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT 17,418 17,418 

432 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 110,000 110,000 

434 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 94,820 94,820 

435 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT 54,000 54,000 

437 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 250,000 250,000 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY 29,279,633 30,929,633 1,650,000 

1A1A MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 845,169 845,169 

1A3A AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SVCS 600 600 

1A4A AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT 17,489 17,489 

1A4N AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT 78,491 78,491 

1ASA AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 162,420 202,420 40,000 

Program increase 40,000 

1A6A AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 2,700 2,700 

1A9A AVIATION LOGISTICS 50,130 50,130 

1B1B MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS 949,539 949,539 

182B SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING 20,226 20,226 

1848 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,679,660 1,679,660 

1C1C COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 37,760 37,760 

1C4C WARFARE TACTICS 25,351 25,351 

1CSC OCEANOGRAPHY 20,045 20,045 

1C6C COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 1,212,296 1,360,296 148,000 

Program increase 148,000 

1C7C EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 10,203 10,203 

103D IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT 127,972 127,972 

1040 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE 221,427 221,427 

8SM1 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 13,386 13,386 

BSS1 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 110,940 110,940 

2C1H FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM 18,460 18,460 

2C3H COAST GUARD SUPPORT 227,033 227,033 
304 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphci folio 181 80986A.180

Budget Committee Change from 

0-1 Request Recommended Request 

3B1K SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 50,269 50,269 

3B4K TRAINING SUPPORT 5,400 5,400 

4A1M ADMINISTRATION 2,418 2,418 

4A2M EXTERNAL RELATIONS 516 516 

4A4M MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 5,107 5,107 

4ASM OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 1,411 1,411 

4A6M SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 2,545 2,545 

4B1N SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 153,427 153,427 

4B3N ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 8,570 8,570 

4C1P NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE 1,425 1,425 

999 OTHER PROGRAMS 5,608 5,608 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY 6,067,993 6,255,993 188,000 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 

1A1A OPERATIONAL FORCES 992,190 992,190 

1A2A FIELD LOGISTICS 559,574 559,574 

1A3A DEPOT MAINTENANCE 570,000 570,000 

BSS1 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 69,726 69,726 

3B4D TRAINING SUPPORT 108,270 108,270 

4A3G SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 365,555 365,555 

4A4G ADMINISTRATION 3,675 3,675 

9999 OTHER PROGRAMS 825 825 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE 

CORPS 2,669,815 2,669,815 

011A PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 1,712,393 1,712,393 

011C COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES 836,104 836,104 

0110 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING 14,118 14,118 

011M DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,373,480 1,473,480 100,000 

Program increase 100,000 

011R FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 122,712 122,712 

011Z BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 1,520,333 1,520,333 

012A GLOBAL C31 AND EARLY WARNING 31,582 31,582 

012C OTHER COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 147,524 147,524 

013A LAUNCH FACILITIES 857 857 

013C SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS 8,353 8,353 

015A COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 50,495 50,495 

021A AIRLIFT OPERATIONS 3,091,133 3,091,133 

0210 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS 47,897 47,897 

021M DEPOT MAINTENANCE 387,179 887,179 500,000 

Program increase 500,000 

021R FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 7,Q43 7,043 

021Z BASE SUPPORT 68,382 68,382 

031A OFFICER ACQUISITION 100 100 

031B RECRUIT TRAINING 478 478 

031Z BASE SUPPORT 19,256 19,256 

032A SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 12,845 12,845 

032B FLIGHT TRAINING 731 731 

032C PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 607 607 

0320 TRAINING SUPPORT 720 720 

033C OFF-DUTY VOLUNTARY EDUCA nON 152 152 
305 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 182 80986A.181

Budget Committee Change from 

0-1 Request Recommended Request 

041A LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 86,273 86,273 

041B TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 2511 2511 

041Z BASE SUPPORT 19,887 19,887 

042A ADMINISTRATION 3,493 3,493 

042B SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 152,086 152,086 

042G OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 269,825 269,825 

044A INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 117 117 

043A SECURITY PROGRAMS 16,558 16,558 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR 

FORCE 10,005,224 10,605,224 600,000 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 

1PL2 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND 2,222,868 2,028,227 -194,641 

Flight Operations - transfer to title II -88,136 

Communications - transfer to title II -44,725 

Maintenance - Family of Special Operations vehicles -

transfer to title II -3,673 

Maintenance - Logistics support base transfer to title II -10,557 

Intelligence - Special Access Program - transfer to title II -36,249 

Specialized skill training - transfer to title II -7,021 

Acquisition program management - transfer to title II -4,280 

ES18 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTtVITY 9,620 9,620 

4GT6 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY 27,781 27,781 

4GT8 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY 76,348 76,348 

4GT9 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY 99,538 99,538 

4GTO DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY 45,746 45,746 

4GTA DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY 100,100 100,100 

4GTD DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 1,950,000 1,950,000 

4GTN OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 38,227 38,227 

4GTQ WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICE 2,784 2,784 

9999 OTHER PROGRAMS 1,862,066 1,862,066 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSEWIDE 6,435,078 6,240,437 -194,641 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE 

113 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 6,995 6,995 

115 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 2,332 2,332 

121 FORCES READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 608 608 

131 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 33,000 33,000 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

RESERVE 42,935 42,935 0 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE 

lA1A MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 17,196 17,196 

lA3A INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE 200 200 

lA5A AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 6,000 6,000 

1818 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS 12,304 12,304 

1848 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE 6,790 6,790 

lCGC COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 13,210 13,210 
306 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 183 80986A.182

Budget Committee 

0-1 Request Recommended 

TOTAL, OPERATION ANO MAINTENANCE, NAVY 

RESERVE 55,700 55,700 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE 

1A1A OPERATING FORCES 11,124 11,124 

BSS1 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 1,410 1,410 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE 

CORPS RESERVE 12,534 12,534 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE 

011M DEPOT MAINTENANCE 26,599 26,599 

011Z BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 6,250 6,250 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR 

FORCE RESERVE 32,849 32,849 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

111 MANEUVER UNITS 29,314 29,314 

112 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 1,494 1,494 

113 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 15,343 15,343 

114 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 1,549 1,549 

116 AVIATION ASSETS 64,504 64,504 

121 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 31,512 31,512 

131 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 42,179 42,179 

133 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 11,996 11,996 

432 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 1,480 1,480 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

NATIONAL GUARD 199,371 199,371 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

011G MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 22,200 22,200 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR 

NATIONAL GUARD 22,200 22,200 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER ACCOUNT 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER 

FUND 

Program increase 

TOTAL, OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

TRANSFER ACCOUNT 

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTUCTURE FUND 

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 279,000 

TOTAL, AFGHANISTAN INFRASTUCTURE FUND 279,000 

1,073,800 

1,073,800 

279,000 

279,000 

Change from 

Request 

0 

0 

1,073,800 

1,073,800 
307 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 184 80986A.183

Budget Committee Change from 

0·1 Request Recommended Request 

AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND 

Defense Forces 5,821,185 5,821,185 

Sustainment 2,735,603 2,735,603 

Infrastructure 278,650 278,650 

Equipment and Transportation 2,180,382 2,180,382 

Training and Operations 626,550 626,550 

Interior Forces 1,895,810 1,895,810 

Sustainment 1,214,995 1,214,995 

Equipment and Transportation 54,696 54,696 

Training and Operations 626,119 626,119 

Related Activities 9,725 9,725 

Sustainment 7,225 7,225 

Training and Operations 2,500 2,500 

TOTAL, AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND 7,726,720 7,726,720 0 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 62,829,052 66,146,211 3,317,159 
308 

LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN AUTHORITIES

FOR AFGHANISTAN

The Committee directs that none of the funds appropriated for 

the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, totaling $2,615,000,000 for 

enablers; funds appropriated for the Afghanistan Infrastructure 

Fund, in whole; and 75 percent of the funds appropriated for the 

Commander’s Emergency Response Program; may be expended or 

obligated until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, certifies to the 

congressional defense committees that a bilateral security agreement has been signed and includes the provisions outlined in the 

pending fiscal year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act. 

EQUIPMENT READINESS

After eleven years of war, in which there has been a steady influx of military equipment into Afghanistan without a corresponding outflow, the Department of Defense now has equipment 

in Afghanistan valued at $36,000,000,000. When U.S. Forces re-deployed from Iraq, much of the equipment was transported directly 

to Afghanistan to support the Afghanistan surge. As U.S. Forces 

re-deploy from Afghanistan, however, equipment will be returned 

to the United States. Years of war have placed demands on air and 

ground force equipment far beyond what is typically experienced 

during training or home station operations. The demands on equipment arise from higher usage rates and from the rigors of extended 

combat operations in harsh environments. This equipment will be 

in need of significant repair before it can be returned to units to 

be used for full spectrum readiness training. During testimony before the Committee, the Army Chief of Staff, General Odierno, emphasized the substantial workload requirement for equipment retrograde, induction, and repair once equipment returns to the 

United States. General Odierno also noted that sequestration has 

further compounded mounting equipment reset and repair requirements as the Services were forced to cancel scheduled equipment 

maintenance and repair in fiscal year 2013 due to lack of funds. As 

the Services redeploy from Afghanistan, the Committee recommends that the Department expeditiously reset, repair, and return equipment to units for readiness training and to support current and future national military and homeland defense priorities. 

The Committee has provided increased funding to support the Department’s efforts to restore equipment readiness as reflected in 

the project level tables. 

WOMEN IN THE AFGHANISTAN NATIONAL SECURITY FORCES

The Committee understands that there is no restriction on the 

enlistment of women in the Afghanistan National Security Forces 

even though cultural differences remain. The Committee encourages the recruitment, training and retention of women in the Afghanistan National Security Forces and provides funding in this 

Act for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for the recruitment 

of both men and women for the Army, Air Force, and the Afghanistan National Police, and for updating facilities to support both 

genders. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
309 

PROCUREMENT 

The Committee recommends an additional appropriation of 

$7,187,146,000 for Procurement. The Committee recommendation 

for each procurement account is shown below: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
310 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 185 80986A.184

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget Committee Change from 

P·l Request Recommended Request 

SATURN ARCH (MIP) (GWOT) 48,000 48,000 

4 MQ·l UAV (GWOT) 31,988 31,988 

AH·64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB NEW BUILD (GWOT) 142,000 142,000 

11 KIOWA WARRIOR UPGRADE (OH·58 D)IWRA(GWOT) 163,800 163,800 

14 CH-47 HELICOPTER (GWOT) 386,000 386,000 

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 771,788 771,788 

HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY (GWOT) 54,000 79,887 25,887 

Program increase 25,887 

GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) (GWOT) 39,045 39,045 

10 ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYSTEM (ATACMS) (GWOT) 35,600 35,600 

PROCUREMENT OF WEAPONS AND TRACKED VEHICLES, ARMY 

M16 RIFLE MODS 15,422 15,422 

Program adjustment 15,422 

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF WEAPONS AND 

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES, ARMY a 15,422 15,422 

CTG, 5,56MM, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 4,400 4,400 

CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 1,500 1,500 

4 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 5,000 5,000 

CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 60,000 60,000 

9 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 5,000 5,000 

13 CTG, ARTY, 75MM AND 105MM: ALL TYPES (GWOT) 10,000 10,000 

14 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES 10,000 10,000 

15 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE XM982 (GWOT) 11,000 11,000 

18 MINES AND CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES 9,482 9,482 

Program increase 9,482 

20 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 57,000 57,000 

DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 4,000 4,000 
311 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 186 80986A.185

Budget Committee Change from 

P·l Request Recommended Request 

GRENADES, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 3,000 3,000 

23 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES 8,000 8,000 

CAD/PAD ALL TYPES (GWOT) 2,000 2,000 

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 180,900 190,382 9,482 

FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES 2,500 2,500 

Program adjustment 2,500 

FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES 2,050 2,050 

Program adjustment 2,050 

14 MINE·RESISTANT AMBUSH·PROTECTED MODS (GWOT 321,040 551,040 230,000 

Program adjustment 230,000 

61 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD (GWOT) 25,000 25,000 

69 DCGS·A (MIP) (GWOT) 7,200 7,200 

73 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL (GWOT) 5,980 5,980 

76 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR (GWOT) 57,800 83,255 25,455 

Program adjustment 25,455 

77 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE 15,300 15,300 

78 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASUI 4,221 4,221 

91 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 1,834 1,834 

92 MOD OF IN·SVC EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 21,000 21,000 

99 COUNTERFIRE RADARS (GWOT) 85,830 85,830 

110 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM 3,200 3,200 

Program adjustment 3,200 

126 FAMILY OF NON·LETHAL EQUIPMENT 15,000 15,000 

Program adjustment 15,000 

127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS 24,932 24,932 

Program adjustment 24,932 

137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT 3,565 3,565 

Program adjustment 3,565 

146 FORCE PROVIDER (GWOT) 51,654 51,654 

147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 6,264 6,264 

TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 603,123 909,825 306,702 
312 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 187 80986A.186

Budget Committee Change from 

P·l Request Recommended Request 

11 UH·1YIAH·1Z (GWOT) 29,520 29,520 

26 MQ·8(GWOT) 13,100 13,100 

31 AV·8 SERIES (GWOT) 57,652 57,652 

32 F·18 SERIES (GWOT) 35,500 35,500 

38 EP·3 SERIES (GWOT) 2,700 2,700 

48 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT (GWOT) 3,375 3,375 

COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 49,183 49,183 

54 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES (GWOT) 4,190 4,190 

59 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION (GWOT) 20,700 20,700 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS (GWOT) 24,776 24,776 

HELLFIRE (GWOT) 27,000 27,000 

10 LASER MAVERICK (GWOT) 58,000 58,000 

11 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (GWOT) 1,500 1,500 

1 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS (GWOT) 11,424 11,424 

AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 30,332 30,332 

MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION (GWOT) 8,282 8,282 

AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES (GWOT) 31,884 31,884 

11 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION (GWOT) 409 409 

12 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO (GWOT) 11,976 11,976 

13 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION (GWOT) 2,447 2,447 

14 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION (GWOT) 7,692 7,692 

15 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION (GWOT) 13,461 13,461 

16 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 3,310 3,310 

17 40 MM, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 6,244 6,244 

60MM, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 3,368 3,368 

81MM, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 9,162 9,162 
313 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 188 80986A.187

Budget Committee Change from 

P-l Request Recommended Request 

20 120MM, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 10,266 10,266 

21 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 1,887 1,887 

22 GRENADES, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 1,611 1,611 

23 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 37,459 0 ·37,459 

Contract delay -37,459 

24 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 970 970 

25 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 418 418 

26 FUZE, ALL TYPES (GWOT) 14,219 14,219 

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE 

CORPS 206,821 169,362 -37,459 

131 TACTICAL VEHICLES (GWOT) 17,968 17,968 

10 JAVELIN (GWOT) 29,334 29,334 

11 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW (GWOT) 105 105 

13 MODIFICATION KITS (GWOT) 16,081 12,981 -3,100 

Unit cost growth -3,100 

15 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 16,081 16,081 

17 MODIFICATION KITS (GWOT) 2,831 2,831 

18 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) (GWOT) 8,170 8,170 

23 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 2,700 2,700 

26 RQ-11 UAV(GWOT) 2,830 2,830 

29 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES (GWOT) 4,866 4,366 ·500 

Unit cost growth ·500 

30 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS (GWOT) 265 265 

42 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT (GWOT) 114 114 

43 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 523 523 

44 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS (GWOT) 365 365 

45 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED (GWOT) 2,004 2,004 

47 EOD SYSTEMS (GWOT) 42,930 42,930 

57 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 385 385 

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 129,584 125,984 ·3,600 
314 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 189 80986A.188

Budget Committee Change from 

P·l Request Recommended Request 

15 CV·22 OSPREY 73,200 73,200 

Add one aircraft for operational loss replacement 73,200 

32 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (G 94,050 94,050 

52 U-2 MODS (GWOT) 11,300 11,300 

59 C·130 (GWOT) 1,618 1,618 

64 RC-135 (GWOT) 2,700 2,700 

79 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (GW 6,000 6,000 

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 115,668 188,868 73,200 

PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE (GWOT) 24,200 24,200 

TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 24,200 24,200 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 

ROCKETS (GWOT) 326 326 

CARTRIDGES (GWOT) 17,634 7,995 ·9,639 

BBU-63/B -9,639 

4 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS (GWOT) 37,514 37,514 

JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION (GWOT) 84,459 71,959 ·12,500 

Pricing adjustment -12,500 

11 FLARES (GWOT) 14,973 14,973 

12 FUZES (GWOT) 3,859 3,859 

14 SMALL ARMS (GWOT) 1,200 1,200 

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR 

FORCE 159,965 137,826 ·22,139 

22 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST (GWOT) 1,800 1,800 

46 MILSATCOM SPACE (GWOT) 5,695 5,695 

59 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (GWOT) 60,600 60,600 

61 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 68,000 68,000 

68 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG (GWOT) 58,250 58,250 

999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS (GWOT) 2,380,501 2,330,501 ·50,000 

ClaSSified adjustment ·50,000 

TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 2,574,846 2,524,846 ·50,000 
315 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 190 80986A.189

Budget Committee Change from 

P·1 Request Recommended Request 

15 TELEPORT PROGRAM (GWOT) 4,760 4,760 

CLASSIFIED 78,986 78,986 

SOF ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT (GWOT) 2,841 2,841 

49 CV·22 MODIFICATION 17,672 17,672 

Operational loss 17,672 

66 SOF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (GWOT) 13,300 13,300 

84 SOF SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS 8,034 8,034 

89 SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS (GWOT) 3,354 3,354 

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE·WIDE 111,275 128,947 17,672 

RESERVE EQUIPMENT 

ARMY RESERVE 275,000 275,000 

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 275,000 

NAVY RESERVE 50,000 50,000 

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 50,000 

MARINE CORPS RESERVE 0 125,000 125,000 

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 125,000 

AIR FORCE RESERVE 0 150,000 150,000 

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 150,000 

TOTAL, RESERVE EQUIPMENT 600,000 

NATIONAL GUARD EQUIPMENT 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 400,000 400,000 

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 400,000 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD 0 500,000 500,000 

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (GWOT) 500,000 

TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD EQUIPMENT 900,000 

TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT 1,500,000 1,500,000 
316 

NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT

The recommendation provides $1,500,000,000 for National Guard 

and Reserve Equipment. Of that amount, $400,000,000 is for the 

Army National Guard; $500,000,000 for the Air National Guard; 

$275,000,000 for the Army Reserve; $50,000,000 for the Navy Reserve; $125,000,000 for the Marine Corps Reserve; and 

$150,000,000 for the Air Force Reserve to meet urgent equipment 

needs that may arise this fiscal year. 

This funding will allow the Guard and reserve components to 

procure high priority equipment that may be used by these components for both combat missions and for missions in support of state 

governors. The conferees direct that the National Guard and Reserve Equipment Account shall be executed by the Chiefs of the 

National Guard and reserve components with priority consideration 

given to the following items: Internal and external crashworthy, 

ballistically self-sealing auxiliary fuel systems for helicopters; highdensity storage cabinets; Air National Guard missile warning system; Generation 4 advanced targeting pods; In-flight propeller balancing system; and ultra-light tactical vehicles. 

RESERVE COMPONENT SIMULATION TRAINING SYSTEMS

The use of simulation training systems has yielded a military 

that is better trained, more capable, and more confident as compared to units that do not have access to modern simulation training devices. Simulation training is a cost-effective means by which 

reserve units can improve tactical decision-making skills and ultimately save lives. It is anticipated that a portion of funds provided 

for National Guard and Reserve Equipment will be used to procure 

a variety of simulation training systems. To ensure the most efficient and effective training programs, these systems should be a 

combination of both government owned and operated simulators 

and simulation support from a dedicated commercial activity capable of providing frequent hardware and software updates. 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION 

The Committee recommends an additional appropriation of 

$116,634,000 for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation. The 

Committee recommendation for each research, development, test 

and evaluation account is shown below: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
317 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 191 80986A.190

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

R-l 

87 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (GWOT) 

TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVALUATION, ARMY 

999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELoPMENT, TEST & 

EVALUATION, NAVY 

999 OTHER PROGRAMS (GWOT) 

TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVALUATION, AIR FORCE 

Budget 

Request 

7,000 

7,000 

34,426 

34,426 

9,000 

9,000 

CommIttee 

Recommended 

7,000 

7,000 

34,426 

34,426 

9,000 

9,000 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, DEFENSE WIDE 

999 OTHER PROGRAMS (GWOT) 

TotAL, RESEARCH, DEVELoPMENT, TEST & 

EVALUATION, DEFENSE WIDE 

66,208 66,208 

66,208 66,208 

Change from 

Request 
318 

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS 

DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 

The Committee recommends an additional appropriation of $264,910,000 for the Defense Working Capital Fund accounts. This 

funding supports purchase of $44,732,000 of Army secondary items 

for war reserves, $10,000,000 to the United States Transportation 

Command (TRANSCOM) for the transportation of Fallen Heroes, 

$78,500,000 for the repair of TRANSCOM C–17 aircraft, and 

$46,678,000 for Defense Logistics Agency distribution and material 

disposition services in Afghanistan. 

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

The Committee recommends an additional appropriation of 

$904,201,000 for the Defense Health Program. 

The Committee’s recommendations for operation and maintenance, procurement and research, development, test and evaluation 

are shown below: 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommended 

Change from 

request 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .............................................................................. 904,201 904,201 – – – 

IN-HOUSE CARE ............................................................................................. 375,958 375,958 – – –

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE .................................................................................. 382,560 382,560 – – – 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ................................................................. 132,749 132,749 – – – 

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT .......................................................................... 2,238 2,238 – – – 

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ............................................................................... 460 460 – – – 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING ............................................................................. 10,236 10,236 – – – 

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 

DEFENSE 

The Committee recommends an additional appropriation of 

$376,305,000 for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities. 

JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND 

The Committee recommends an additional appropriation of 

$1,000,000,000 for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat 

Fund. The Committee’s recommendations for the Joint Improvised 

Explosive Device Defeat Fund are shown below: 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget request Committee 

recommended 

Change from 

request 

1 ATTACK THE NETWORK ............................................................. 417,700,000 417,700,000 – – – 

2 DEFEAT THE DEVICE ................................................................. 248,886,000 248,886,000 – – – 

3 TRAIN THE FORCE ..................................................................... 106,000,000 106,000,000 – – – 

4 STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................... 227,414,000 227,414,000 – – – 

TOTAL, JOINT IED DEFEAT FUND ............................................ 1,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 – – – 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
319 

DETECTION OF MATERIALS USED IN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES

Raw materials, such as nitrate fertilizers and chlorates, are inexpensive, readily available, and easy to manufacture into Improvised 

Explosive Devices (IEDs). These materials are smuggled into Afghanistan in bulk, often hidden in cement, flour, or sugar bags. 

Bulk detection becomes critical in countering the IED networks, 

and can allow for a more proactive response, rather than a reactive 

response after an IED detonation. Efforts are currently underway 

to assist with training and equipping the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) to strengthen its ability to identify and 

counter the IED threat. The Committee encourages the Secretary 

of Defense to work with the Minster of Defense of Afghanistan, and 

leadership of the Coalition Force, to explore the feasibility of equipping and training the ANSF with a simple, fast, and effective bulk 

detection capability for nitrate fertilizers and chlorates. 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

The Committee recommends no funding for the Joint Urgent 

Operational Needs Fund. 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 

The Committee recommends an additional appropriation of 

$10,766,000 for the Office of the Inspector General. 

GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Title IX contains several general provisions, many of which extend or modify war-related authorities included in previous Acts. A 

brief description of the recommended provisions follows: 

Section 9001 has been amended and provides that funds made 

available in this title are in addition to funds appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for the current fiscal year. 

Section 9002 has been amended and provides for general transfer 

authority within Title IX. 

Section 9003 has been amended and provides that supervision 

and administration costs associated with a construction project 

funded with appropriations available for operation and maintenance, Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund or the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund may be obligated at the time a construction contract is awarded. 

Section 9004 provides for the procurement of passenger motor vehicles and heavy and light armored vehicles for use by military and 

civilian employees of the Department of Defense in the U.S. Central Command area. 

Section 9005 has been amended and provides funding for the 

Commander’s Emergency Response Program, within certain limitations. 

Section 9006 provides lift and sustainment to coalition forces 

supporting military and stability operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
320 

Section 9007 prohibits the establishment of permanent bases in 

Iraq or Afghanistan or United States control over Iraq oil resources. 

Section 9008 prohibits the use of funding in contravention of the 

United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. 

Section 9009 limits the obligation of funding for the Afghanistan 

Security Forces Fund until certain conditions have been met. 

Section 9010 provides for the purchase of items of a particular 

investment unit cost from funding made available for operation and 

maintenance. 

Section 9011 has been amended and provides funding for the 

Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan. 

Section 9012 has been amended and provides funding for the operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq 

and security assistance teams. 

Section 9013 has been amended and provides for the rescission of $46,022,000 from the following programs: 

2009 Appropriations: 

General Provisions: 

Retroactive Stop Loss Special Pay Program ...................... $46,022,000 

Section 9014 has been amended and restricts funds provided 

under the heading Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide for 

payments under Coalition Support Funds for reimbursement to the 

Government of Pakistan until certain conditions are met. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(321) 

TITLE X 

Title X contains one new general provision. A brief description of 

the recommended provision follows: 

Section 10001 is a new provision stating that the applicable allocation of new budget authority made by the Committee on Appropriations does not exceed the amount of proposed new budget authority. 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 

The following items are included in accordance with various requirements of the Rules of the House of Representatives: 

CHANGES IN THE APPLICATION OF EXISTING LAW

Pursuant to clause 3(f)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the following statements are submitted describing the effect of provisions in the accompanying bill which directly 

or indirectly change the application of existing law. 

Language is included in various parts of the bill to continue ongoing activities which require annual authorization or additional 

legislation, which to date has not been enacted. 

The bill includes a number of provisions which place limitations 

on the use of funds in the bill or change existing limitations and 

which might, under some circumstances, be construed as changing 

the application of law. 

The bill includes a number of provisions, which have been virtually unchanged for many years that are technically considered 

legislation. 

The bill provides that appropriations shall remain available for 

more than one year for some programs for which the basic authorizing legislation does not presently authorize each extended availability. 

In various places in the bill, the Committee has allocated funds 

within appropriation accounts in order to fund specific programs. 

Changes in the application of existing law found within appropriations headings: 

Language is included in various accounts placing a limitation on 

funds for emergencies and extraordinary expenses. 

Language is included that provides not more than $25,000,000 

for the Combatant Commander Initiative Fund. 

Language is included that provides not more than $36,000,000 

for emergencies and extraordinary expenses. 

Language is included that provides not less than $36,262,000 for 

the Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program, of which not less than $3,600,000 shall be available for centers. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
322 

Language is included that makes available $8,721,000 for certain 

classified activities, allows such funds to be transferred between 

certain accounts, and exempts such funds from the investment item 

unit cost of items ceiling. 

Language is included that provides that any transfer authority 

provided under the heading ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, DefenseWide’’ shall be in addition to any other transfer authority provided 

in this Act. 

Language is included under the various Environmental Restoration accounts that provides that the Service Secretaries may transfer such funds for the purposes of the funds provided under such 

appropriations headings. 

Language is included that provides for specific construction, acquisition, or conversion of vessels under the heading ‘‘Shipbuilding 

and Conversion, Navy’’. 

Language is included under the heading ‘‘Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy’’ that provides funds for certain 

activities. 

Language is included under the heading ‘‘Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide’’ that provides 

$250,000,000 for the Defense Rapid Innovation Program and provides for the transfer of funds. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds 

within the ‘‘National Defense Sealift Fund’’. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds provided 

under ‘‘National Defense Sealift Fund’’ to award new contracts that 

provide for the acquisition of major components unless such components are made in the United States. 

Language is included that provides that the exercise of an option 

in a contract award through the obligation of previously appropriated funds shall not be considered to be the award of a new contract. 

Language is included that provides waiver authority of the Buy 

America provisions under ‘‘National Defense Sealift Fund’’ under 

certain circumstances. 

Language is included that provides that not less than $8,000,000 

of funds provided under ‘‘Defense Health Program’’ shall be available for HIV/AIDS prevention education activities. 

Language is included that provides for the carry-over of one percent of the Operation and Maintenance account under the ‘‘Defense 

Health Program’’. 

Language is included that limits obligation of funds provided 

under the ‘‘Defense Health Program’’ for the development or procurement of an electronic health record to a health record as set 

forth in the Joint Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2013–2015. 

Language is included that specifics the use of certain funds provided under ‘‘Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction’’. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds 

under ‘‘Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities’’. Such transfer authority shall be in addition to other transfer authority provided elsewhere in the Act. 

Language is included that provides that no funds made available 

in this Act may be used for publicity or propaganda purposes not 

authorized by Congress. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
323 

Language is included that provides for conditions and limitations 

on the payment of compensation to, or employment of, foreign nationals. 

Language is included that provides that no funds made available 

in this Act may be obligated beyond the end of the fiscal year unless express provision for a greater period of availability is provided 

elsewhere in this Act. 

Language is included that provides a 20 percent limitation on the 

obligation of funds provided in this Act during the last two months 

of the fiscal year with certain exceptions. 

Language is included that provides for general transfer authority. 

Language is included that provides for incorporation of project 

level tables. 

Language is included that provides for the establishment of a 

baseline for application of reprogramming and transfer authorities 

for fiscal year 2014 and prohibits certain reprogrammings until 

after submission of a report. 

Language is included that provides for limitations on the use and 

transfer authority of working capital fund cash balances. 

Language is included that provides that prohibits funds appropriated in this Act to initiate a special access program without 

prior notification to the congressional defense committees. 

Language is included that provides limitations and conditions on 

the use of funds made available in this Act to initiate multi-year 

contracts. 

Language is included that provides for the use and obligation of 

funds for humanitarian and civic assistance costs under Chapter 20 

of title 10, United States Code. 

Language is included that provides that civilian personnel of the 

Department may not be managed on the basis of end strength or 

be subject to end strength limitations. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used to influence congressional action on any matters pending before the Congress. 

Language is included that prohibits compensation from being 

paid to any member of the Army who is participating as a full-time 

student and who receives benefits from the Education Benefits 

Fund when time spent as a full-time student is counted toward 

that member’s service commitment. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds appropriated in title III of this Act for the Department of Defense 

Pilot Mentor-Prote ́ge ́ Program. 

Language is included that provides for the Department of Defense to purchase anchor and mooring chains manufactured only in 

the United States. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available to the 

Department of Defense from being used to demilitarize or dispose 

of surplus firearms. 

Language is included that provides a limitation on funds being 

used for the relocation of any Department of Defense entity into or 

within the National Capital Region. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
324 

Language is included that provides for incentive payments authorized by section 504 of the Indian Financing Act of 1974 (25 

U.S.C. 1544). 

Language is included that provides that no funds made available 

in this Act for the Defense Media Activity may be used for national 

or international political or psychological activities. 

Language is included that provides for the obligation of funds for 

purposes specified in section 2350j(c) of title 10, United States 

Code. 

Language is included that provides funding for the Civil Air Patrol Corporation. 

Language is included that provides for the number of staff years 

of technical effort that may be funded for defense Federally Funded 

Research and Development Centers. 

Language is included that provides for the Department of Defense to procure carbon, alloy, or armor steel plate melted and 

rolled only in the United States and Canada. 

Language is included that defines congressional defense committees as being the Armed Services Committees and the Subcommittees on Defense of the Committees on Appropriations of the House 

and Senate. 

Language is included that provides for competitions between private firms and Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Activities for modification, depot maintenance, and repair of aircraft, vehicles, and vessels, as well as the production of components and 

other Defense-related articles. 

Language is included that provides for revocation of blanket 

waivers of the Buy America Act upon a finding that a country has 

violated a reciprocal trade agreement by discriminating against 

products produced in the United States that are covered by the 

agreement. 

Language is included that provides for the availability of funds 

for purposes specified in section 2921(c)(2) of the 1991 National Defense Authorization Act, namely facility maintenance and repair 

and environmental restoration at military installations in the 

United States. 

Language is included that provides for the conveyance, without 

consideration, of relocatable housing units located at Grand Forks, 

Malmstrom, Mountain Home, Ellsworth, and Minot Air Force 

Bases to Indian Tribes that are excess to Air Force needs. 

Language is included that provides authority to use operation 

and maintenance appropriations to purchase items having an investment item unit cost of not more than $250,000. 

Language is included that prohibits the purchase of specified investment items within Working Capital Fund. 

Language is included that provides that none of the funds appropriated for the Central Intelligence Agency shall remain available 

for obligation beyond the current fiscal year except for funds appropriated for the Reserve for Contingencies, the Working Capital 

Fund, or other certain programs authorized under section 503 of 

the National Security Act. 

Language is included that provides that funds available for the 

Defense Intelligence Agency may be used for intelligence commuVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00334 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
325 

nications and intelligence information systems for the Services, the 

Unified and Specified Commands, and the component commends. 

Language is included that provides that not less than 

$12,000,000 within ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide’’ 

shall be for mitigation of environmental impacts on Indian lands. 

Language is included that provides for the Department of Defense to comply with the Buy American Act (chapter 83 of title 41, 

United States Code). 

Language is included that provides conditions under which contracts for studies, analyses, or consulting services may be entered 

into without competition on the basis of an unsolicited proposal. 

Language is included that provides for the limitations of funds 

made available in this Act to establish Field Operating Agencies. 

Language is included that provides grant authorities for the Department of Defense acting through the Office of Economic Adjustment. 

Language is included that provides for the limitations on the conversion of an activity or function of the Department of Defense to 

contractor performance. 

Language is included that provides for the rescission of previously appropriated funds. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used to reduce authorized positions for military 

technicians (dual status) of the Army National Guard, Air National 

Guard, Army Reserve, and Air Force Reserve unless such reductions are a direct result of a reduction in military force structure. 

Language is included that provides that none of the funds made 

available in this Act may be obligated or expended for assistance 

to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea unless appropriated 

for that purpose. 

Language is included that provides for reimbursement to the National Guard and reserve when members of the National Guard 

and reserve provide intelligence or counterintelligence support to 

the Combatant Commands, Defense Agencies, and Joint Intelligence Activities. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used to reduce civilian medical and medical support 

personnel assigned to military treatment facilities below the September 30, 2003, level unless the Service Surgeons General certify 

to the congressional defense committees that it is a responsible 

stewardship of resources to do so. 

Language is included that provides that Defense and Central Intelligence Agencies’ drug interdiction and counter-drug activity 

funds may not be transferred to other agencies unless specifically 

provided in an appropriations law. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds appropriated by this Act for the procurement of ball and roller bearings 

other than those produced by a domestic source and of domestic origin. 

Language is included that provides for the Department of Defense to purchase supercomputers manufactured only in the United 

States unless the Secretary certifies such acquisition must be made 

for national security purposes. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
326 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this or any other Act to transfer administrative responsibilities or budgetary resources of any program, project, or activity financed by this Act to the jurisdiction of another Federal agency not 

financed by this Act without expressed authorization of the Congress. 

Language is included that provides for prior congressional notification of article transfers to international peacekeeping organizations. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act for contractor bonuses from being paid due to business restructuring. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds to 

be used to support personnel supporting approved non-traditional 

defense activities. 

Language is included that provides for the Department of Defense to dispose of negative unliquidated or unexpended balances 

for expired or closed accounts. 

Language is included that provides conditions for the use of 

equipment of the National Guard Distance Learning Project on a 

space-available, reimbursable basis. 

Language is included that provides for the availability of funds 

provided by this Act to implement cost-effective agreements for required heating facility modernization in the Kaiserslautern Military Community, Germany. 

Language is included that provides for the limitation on the use 

of funds appropriated in title IV to procure end-items for delivery 

to military forces for operational training, operational use, or inventory requirements. 

Language is included that provides for a waiver of the ‘‘Buy 

America’’ provisions for certain cooperative programs. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act to support the training of members of foreign security forces who have engaged in gross violations of human rights. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act for repairs or maintenance to military family housing units. 

Language is included that provides obligation authority for new 

starts for advanced concept technology demonstration projects only 

after notification to the congressional defense committees. 

Language is included that provides that the Secretary of Defense 

shall provide a classified quarterly report on certain matters as directed in the classified annex accompanying this Act. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available to the Department of Defense to provide support to an agency 

that is more than 90 days in arrears in making payments to the 

Department of Defense for goods or services provided on a reimbursable basis. 

Language is included that provides for the use of National Guard 

personnel to support ground-based elements of the National Ballistic Missile Defense System. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act to transfer to any nongovernmental entity ammunition held by the Department of Defense that has a center—fire carVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00336 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
327 

tridge and is designated as ‘‘armor piercing’’ except for demilitarization purposes. 

Language is included that provides for a waiver by the Chief, National Guard Bureau or his designee for all or part of consideration 

in cases of personal property leases of less than one year. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used to purchase alcoholic beverages. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds 

made available in this Act under ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, 

Army’’ to other activities of the Federal Government for classified 

purposes. 

Language is included that provides for the forced matching of 

disbursement and obligations made by the Department of Defense 

in fiscal year 2014. Language is included that provides a limitation of $200,000,000 

for transfer to the Department of State Global Security Contingency Fund, and set forth certain reporting requirements prior to 

such transfer. 

Language is included that provides grant authority for the construction and furnishing of additional Fisher Houses to meet the 

needs of military family members when confronted with the illness 

or hospitalization of an eligible military beneficiary. 

Language is included that provides funding and transfer authority for the Israeli Cooperative missile defense programs. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act to be obligated to modify the command and control 

relationship to give the Fleet Forces Command administration and 

operations control of U.S. Naval Forces assigned to the Pacific 

Fleet. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds to 

properly complete prior year shipbuilding programs. 

Language is included that provides that funds made available in 

this Act are deemed to be specifically authorized by Congress for 

purposes of section 504 of the National Security Act of 1947. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act to initiate a new start program without prior written notification. 

Language is included that provides that the budget of the President for fiscal year 2014 shall include separate budget justification 

documents for costs of the United States Armed Forces’ participation in contingency operations that contain certain budget exhibits 

as defined in the Department of Defense Financial Management 

Regulation. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used for the research, development, test, evaluation, 

procurement, or deployment of nuclear armed interceptors of a missile defense system. 

Language is included that provides the Secretary of Defense discretionary authority to make grants to the United Service Organizations and the Red Cross if he determines it to be in the national 

interest. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used to reduce or disestablish the operation of the 

53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron of the Air Force Reserve. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
328 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used for the integration of foreign intelligence information unless the information has been lawfully collected and processed during conduct of authorized foreign intelligence activities. 

Language is included that provides that at the time members of 

reserve components of the Armed Forces are called or ordered to 

active duty, each member shall be notified in writing of the expected period during which the member will be mobilized. 

Language is included that provides that the Secretary of Defense 

may transfer funds from any available Department of the Navy appropriation to any available Navy ship construction appropriation 

to liquidate costs caused by rate adjustments or other economic factors. 

Language is included that provides for the use of current and expired ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy’’ subdivisions to reimburse the Judgment Fund. 

Language is included that prohibits the transfer of program authorities related to tactical unmanned aerial vehicles from the 

Army. 

Language is included that provides funding and authority for the 

Asia Pacific Regional Initiative program. 

Language is included that limits the obligation authority of funds 

provided for the Director of National Intelligence to the current fiscal year except for research and technology which shall remain 

available for the current and the following fiscal years. 

Language is included that provides for the adjustment of obligations within the ‘‘Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy’’ appropriation. 

Language is included that prohibits transfers of funds until the 

Director of National Intelligence submits a baseline for application 

of reprogramming and transfer authorities. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of up to $20,000,000 of funds available for the Program Manager for Information Sharing Environment to be transferred to other departments and agencies for certain purposes. 

Language is included that sets forth reprogramming and transfer 

procedures for the National Intelligence Program. 

Language is included that provides that the Director of National 

Intelligence shall provide budget exhibits identifying the five year 

future-years intelligence program. 

Language is included that defines the congressional intelligence 

committees. 

Language is included that directs the Department of Defense to 

report on the Cost of War Execution Report on a monthly basis. 

Language is included that provides that funds from certain operation and maintenance accounts may be transferred to a central 

fund established pursuant to section 2493(d) of title 10, United 

States Code. 

Language is included that provides that funds may be used for 

the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. 

Language is included that provides that agencies post congressionally directed reports on a public website. 

Language is included that provides limitations on the award of 

contracts to contractors that require mandatory arbitration for cerVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00338 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
329 

tain claims as a condition of employment or a contractual relationship. The Secretary is authorized to waive the applicability of these 

limitations for national security interests. 

Language is included that provides funds and transfer authority 

for the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund. 

Language is included that provides a limitation on the number 

of senior executives employed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. 

Language is included that provides a limitation on certain senior 

mentors unless such mentors make certain financial disclosures. 

Language is included that provides authority to purchase heavy 

and light armored vehicles notwithstanding price or other limitations on the purchase of passenger carrying vehicles. 

Language is included that provides availability of funds appropriated under ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide’’ for activities related to the military buildup of Guam. 

Language is included that places limitations on the number of 

parking spaces provided by the BRAC 133 project, with certain 

waiver authorities. 

Language is included that requires the Secretary of Defense to 

provide quarterly reports on civilian personnel end strength. 

Language is included that provides transfer authority for the Director of National Intelligence for the National Intelligence Program. 

Language is included that provides funding for construction, renovation, repair, and expansion of public schools on military installations. 

Language is included that prohibits funds to transfer or release 

certain individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba into the 

United States, its territories, or possessions. 

Language is included that places limitations on the transfer or 

release of certain individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 

to the custody or control of a foreign country unless certain certifications are provided. 

Language is included that prohibits funds to construct, acquire, 

or modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Language is included that places limitations on the provision of 

funds to any corporation with an unpaid Federal tax liability. 

Language is included that places limitations on the provision of 

funds to any corporation convicted of a felony criminal violation 

within the preceding 24 months. 

Language is included that directs the Secretary of the Air Force 

to obligate and expend funds previously appropriated for the purposes for which such funds were originally provided. 

Language is included that prohibits the Department of Defense 

from entering into certain agreements with Rosoboronexport with 

certain waiver authorities. 

Language is included that repeals a reporting requirement in division A of Public Law 107–117. 

Language is included that prohibits the purchase or manufacture 

of a United States flag uncles such flag is treated as a covered item 

under section 2533a(b). 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
330 

Language is included that provides an additional appropriation 

and transfer authority to the Services for purposes of implementing 

a Sexual Assault Special Victims Program. 

Language is included that prohibits reduction or elimination in 

funding for a program, project, or activity until such reduction or 

elimination is enacted in an appropriations Act, or pursuant to the 

reprogramming or transfer provisions in this Act. 

Language is included that provides an additional appropriation 

and transfer authority for pay for military personnel. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds to 

the Coast Guard. 

Language is included that places limitations and requirements 

on the use of funds for reimbursements to key cooperating nations 

for logistical, military, and other support. 

Language is included that requires $35,000,000 to be made available for support for foreign forces participation in Counter Lord’s 

Resistance Army efforts. 

Language is included that provides funds and transfer authority 

for overseas contingency operations. 

Language is included that provides authority for infrastructure 

projects in Afghanistan subject to certain conditions and reporting 

requirements. 

Language is included that provides authority for the provision of 

assistance to Afghanistan Security Forces subject to certain notification requirements. 

Language is included that requires the Chiefs of National Guard 

and Reserve components to submit the modernization priority assessment for their respective components to the congressional defense committees. 

Language is included that allows the Director of the Joint Improvised Explosive Defeat Organization to undertake certain activities, 

and allows funds to be transferred to other appropriations accounts 

elsewhere in this Act subject to prior written notification to the 

congressional defense committees. 

Language is included that provides that funds made available in 

title IX are in addition to amounts appropriated or otherwise made 

available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014. 

Language is included that provides for transfer authority between appropriations made available in title IX. 

Language is included that provides for supervision and administration costs associated with overseas contingency operations. 

Language is included that provides authority to purchase passenger, heavy, and light armored vehicles notwithstanding price or 

other limitations on the purchase of passenger carrying vehicles for 

use in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. 

Language is included that provides funds and authority for the 

Commander’s Emergency Response Program and establishes certain reporting requirements. 

Language is included that authorizes the use of funds to provide 

certain assistance to coalition forces supporting military and stability operations in Afghanistan and establishes certain reporting 

requirements. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
331 

Language is included that places limitations on the use of Afghanistan Security Forces Funds and requires certain certifications. 

Language is included that authorizes funds in title IX for the 

purchase of items having an investment unit cost of up to 

$500,000, subject to certain conditions. Language is included that authorizes up to $63,800,000 under 

the heading ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Army’’ for the Task 

Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan, subject 

to certain reporting requirements. Language is included that authorizes up to $209,000,000 under 

the heading ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Air Force’’ for the Office 

of Security Cooperation in Iraq and security assistance teams, and 

operations and activities authorized in the fiscal year 2014 National Defense Authorization, subject to written notice requirements. 

Language is included that provides for the rescission of previously appropriated funds. 

Language is included that places limitations on the use of Coalition Support Funds for the Government of Pakistan. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
332 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 046 here 81454.206

APPROPRIATIONS NOT AUTHORIZED BY LAW 

Pursuant to clause 3(f)(1) fa rule XIH of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the following table lists the 

appropriations in the accompanying bill which are not authorized by law: 

Agency!Program 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ... 

Military Personnel, Army .. . 

Military Personnel, Navy .... , 

Mllitary Personnel, Marine Corps ... 

Mmtary Personnel, Air Force ... 

Reserve Personnel, Army ... 

Reserve Personnel. Navy. H 

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps .... 

Reserve Personnel, Air Force. ,_ 

National Guard Personnel, Army ... 

National Guard Personnel, Air Force ... 

Operation and Maintenance, Army .. 

Operation and Maintenance, Navy." 

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps ... 

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force ... 

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, .. 

Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve .. . 

Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve .. . 

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve, .. 

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve .... 

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard .. , . 

Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard ... 

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces". 

Environmental Restoration, Army ... 

Environmenta! Restoration, Navy.. . 

Environmental Restoration, Air Force , .. 

Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide .. 

Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites 

Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Ald ... 

Cooperative Threat Reduction Account., 

Aircraft Procurement, Army ... 

Procurement of Ammunition, Army ... 

Other Procurement, Army" .. 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy .. , 

Weapons Procurement, Navy ... 

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps .. , 

Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy ... 

Other Procurement, Navy .. ". 

Procurement, Marine Corps.,. 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force" .. 

Missile Procurement, Air Force, .. 

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force ... 

Other Procurement, Air Force .. 

Procurement, Defense-Wide ... 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army ... 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy.", 

Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense ... 

Defense Working Capital Funds., .. 

National Defense Sealift Fund ... 

Defense Health Program 

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense .. 

Intelligence Community Management Accoun!. ... 

TItle IX • Overseas Deployments and Other Activities 

National Guard and Reserve Equipment .. 

[In thousands of dollars] 

AppropriatIons 2014 2014 

Last year of Authorization in last year of Appropriations compared to compared to 

authorization Level authorization in this bill 2014 2012 2013 

2013 (1) 

2013 (1) 

2013 (1) 

2013 (1) 

2013 (1) 

2013 (1) 

2013 (1) 

2013 (1) 

2013 (1) 

2013 (1) 

2013 36,481,545 

2013 41,745,965 

2013 6,005,963 

2013 35,659,759 

2013 32,088,013 

2013 3,178,208 

2013 1.246,982 

2013 272,285 

2013 3,207,082 

2013 7,158,012 

2013 6,185,555 

2013 13,516 

2013 335,921 

2013 310,594 

2013 529,263 

2013 11,133 

2013 237,543 

2013 108,759 

2013 519,111 

2018 5,853,729 

2013 1,352,689 

2013 1,814,523 

2013 1,571,768 

2013 6,152,033 

2013 17,127,463 

2013 3,112,057 

2013 726,000 

2013 14,258,524 

2013 6,219,041 

2013 1,482,081 

2013 i 1 ,279,599 

2013 5,459,146 

2013 599,194 

2013 16,749,04$ 

2013 4,491,335 

2013 8,494,755 

2013 17,30$,977 

2013 25,383,339 

2013 18,550,561 

2013 200,268 

2013 1,371,560 

2013 608,136 

2013 32,620,718 

2013 1,301,786 

2013 1,025,263 

2013 

2013 332,921 

2013 N/A 

2013 N/A 

2018 88,478,984 

2013 150,000 

40,730,014 

27.075,933 

12,560,999 

28,124,109 

4,456,823 

1,871.688 

651,861 

1,743,875 

8,089,477 

3,158,015 

36,422,738 

41,463,733 

6,075,667 

35,408,795 

31,780,813 

3,199,423 

1,256,347 

277,377 

3.362,041 

7.187,731 

6,608,826 

13,516 

335,921 

310,594 

529,263 

11,133 

237,543 

108,759 

519,111 

6,115,226 

1,602,689 

1,884,706 

1,576,768 

6,488,045 

17,518,324 

3,072,112 

677243 

15,236,126 

6,364,191 

1,482,081 

11,304,899 

5,449,146 

599,194 

16,632,575 

4,429,335 

8,593,055 

16,987,'168 

25,117,692 

19,100,362 

185,268 

1,516,184 

564,636 

32.862,234 

1,301,786 

1,133,363 

217,414 

350,321 

514,000 

511,476 

88,208,906 

2,000,000 

40.908,919 -2,389,490 178,905 

2'1.671,555 868,221 595,622 

12,826,857 -808,279 265,858 

28.382,963 286,255 258,854 

4,483,343 193,936 26,520 

1,875,536 -60,008 3,848 

665,499 20,777 13,638 

1,745,579 32,874 1,704 

7,958,568 372,923 -130,909 

3,130,361 41,432 -27,654 

35,183,796 4,110,894 -1,238,942 

40,127,402 2,006,581 -1,336,331 

6,298,757 755,820 223,090 

37,438,701 2,453,215 2,029,900 

32,301,685 2,149,677 520,872 

3,199,151 127,418 ·272 

1.200,283 -104,851 -56,064 

266,561 -4,882 -10,816 

3,149,046 -125,313 -212,995 

7,102,113 177,181 -85,618 

6,675,999 577,219 67,173 

13,606 -255 90 

298,815 -47,216 -37,106 

316,103 7,435 5,509 

439,820 -85.633 -89,443 

10,757 41 -376 

262,443 -64,052 24,900 

109,500 1,838 741 

528,455 20,236 9,344 

5,236,653 -123,681 -878,573 

1,628,083 166,860 25,394 

i ,545,560 -524,845 ~339, 146 

1,465,937 -418,487 -110,831 

6,467,751 -1,456,463 -20,294 

17,092,784 -582,950 -425,540 

3,017,646 ·206.786 -54,466 

544,116 -82,732 ·133,127 

15,000,704 81,590 -235,422 

6,824,824 811,439 460,633 

1,271,311 ·151,259 -210,770 

10,860,606 -2,089,394 -444,293 

5,267,119 -813,758 -182,027 

743,442 244,257 144,248 

16,791,497 -612,067 158,922 

4,522,990 -370,438 93,655 

7,961,486 -784,006 -631,569 

15,368,352 -2,385,588 -1,619,416 

24,947,354 -1,588,642 -170,338 

17,885,538 ·1,308,417 -1,214,824 

246,800 55,508 81,532 

1,545,827 -29,183 29,643 

595,700 -504,819 31,064 

33,573,582 1,091,523 711 ,348 

1,057,123 -497.299 -244,663 

1,007,762 -201,858 -125.601 

-217,414 

347,000 81 -3,321 

514,000 300 

552,535 4,644 41,059 

85,768,949 ·29,196,686 -2,439,957 

1,500,000 500,000 -500,000 

1/ The FY 2012 National Defense Authorization Act authorizes $135,777 ,368,000 for military personnel 

Note: The bill includes several transfers of funds which mayor may not be specifically authorized in law. 
333 

TRANSFER OF FUNDS

Pursuant to clause 3(f)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the following is submitted describing the transfer of funds provided in the accompanying bill. 

Language has been included under ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, 

Defense-Wide’’ which provides for the transfer of funds for certain 

classified activities. 

Language has been included under ‘‘Environmental Restoration, 

Army’’ which provides for the transfer of funds for environmental 

restoration, reduction and recycling of hazardous waste, removal of 

unsafe buildings and debris, or for similar purposes. 

Language has been included under ‘‘Environmental Restoration, 

Navy’’ which provides for the transfer of funds for environmental 

restoration, reduction and recycling of hazardous waste, removal of 

unsafe buildings and debris, or for similar purposes. 

Language has been included under ‘‘Environmental Restoration, 

Air Force’’ which provides for the transfer of funds for environmental restoration, reduction and recycling of hazardous waste, removal of unsafe buildings and debris, or for similar purposes. 

Language has been included under ‘‘Environmental Restoration, 

Defense-Wide’’ which provides for the transfer of funds for environmental restoration, reduction and recycling of hazardous waste, removal of unsafe buildings and debris, or for similar purposes. 

Language has been included under ‘‘Environmental Restoration, 

Formerly Used Defense Sites’’ which provides for the transfer of 

funds for environmental restoration, reduction and recycling of hazardous waste, removal of unsafe buildings and debris, or for similar 

purposes. 

Language has been included under ‘‘Research, Development, Test 

and Evaluation, Defense Wide’’ which provides for the transfer of 

funds for the Defense Rapid Innovation Program to appropriations 

for research, development, test and evaluation for specific purposes. 

Language has been included under ‘‘Drug Interdiction and 

Counter-Drug Activities, Defense’’ which provides for the transfer 

of funds to appropriations available to the Department of Defense 

for military personnel of the reserve components; for operation and 

maintenance; for procurement; and for research, development, test 

and evaluation. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8005’’ which provides for the transfer of working capital funds to 

other appropriations accounts of the Department of Defense for 

military functions. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8008’’ which provides for the transfer of funds between working 

capital funds and the ‘‘Foreign Currency Fluctuations, Defense’’ appropriation and the ‘‘Operation and Maintenance’’ appropriation accounts. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8015’’ which provides for the transfer of funds from the Department of Defense Pilot Mentor-Prote ́ge ́ Program to any other appropriation for the purposes of implementing a Mentor-Prote ́ge ́ Program development assistance agreement. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
334 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8051’’ which provides for the transfer of funds from ‘‘Operation and 

Maintenance, Defense-Wide’’ to appropriations available for the pay 

of military personnel in connection with support and services of eligible organizations and activities outside the Department of Defense. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8066’’ which provides for the transfer of funds from ‘‘Operation and 

Maintenance, Army’’ to other activities of the federal government. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8068’’ which provides for the transfer of funds available under ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide’’ to the Department of 

State ‘‘Global Security Contingency Fund’’. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8070’’ which provides for the transfer of funds from ‘‘Procurement, 

Defense-Wide’’ and ‘‘Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, 

Defense-Wide’’ for the Israeli Cooperative Programs. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8072’’ which provides for the transfer of funds under the heading 

‘‘Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy’’ to fund prior year shipbuilding cost increases. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8081’’ which provides for the transfer of funds from any available 

Department of the Navy appropriations to any available Navy ship 

construction appropriation for the purpose of liquidating necessary 

changes resulting from inflation, market fluctuations, or rate adjustments. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8088’’ which provides for the transfer of funds appropriated in the 

Intelligence Community Management Account for the Program 

Manager for the Information Sharing Environment to other departments and agencies for the purposes of Government-wide information sharing activities. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8093’’ which provides for the transfer of funds from ‘‘Operation and 

Maintenance, Army’’, ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Navy’’, and 

‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Air Force’’ to the central fund established for Fisher Houses and Suites. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8094’’ which provides that funds appropriated by this Act may be 

made available for the purpose of making remittances to the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8098’’ which provides for the transfer of funds appropriated for operation and maintenance for the Defense Health Program to the 

Joint Department of Defense—Department of Veterans Affairs 

Medical Facility Demonstration Fund. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8106’’ which provides for the transfer of funds for the National Intelligence Program. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8122’’ which provides for the transfer of funds from the Department of Defense to the Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
335 

for purposes of implementation of a Sexual Assault Special Victims 

Program. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

8126’’ which provides for the transfer of funds for pay for military 

personnel for purposes of fully funding the authorized military pay 

raise. 

Language has been included under title IX ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Navy’’ which provides for the transfer of funds to the 

Coast Guard ‘‘Operating Expenses’’ account. 

Language has been included under title IX ‘‘Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund’’ which provides for the transfer of 

funds to military personnel accounts; operation and maintenance 

accounts; procurement accounts; and working capital fund accounts 

for expenses directly related to overseas contingency operations by 

United States military forces. 

Language has been included under title IX ‘‘Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund’’ which provides for the transfer of funds to the Department of State for purposes of undertaking infrastructure 

projects in Afghanistan. 

Language has been included under title IX ‘‘Afghanistan Security 

Forces Fund’’ for the purposes of allowing the Commander, Combined Security Transition Command—Afghanistan, or the Secretary’s designee, to provide assistance, with the concurrence of the 

Secretary of State, to the security forces of Afghanistan. 

Language has been included under title IX ‘‘Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund’’ which provides for the transfer of 

funds to appropriations for military personnel; operation and maintenance; procurement; research, development, test and evaluation; 

and defense working capital funds to assist United States forces in 

the defeat of improvised explosive devices. 

Language has been included under ‘‘General Provisions, Sec. 

9002’’ which provides for the authority to transfer funds between 

the appropriations or funds made available to the Department of 

Defense in title IX, subject to certain conditions. 

RESCISSIONS

Pursuant to clause 3(f)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

or Representatives, the following table is submitted describing the 

rescissions recommended in the accompanying bill: 

General Provisions, 2009 ...................................................................... $46,022,000 

National Defense Sealift Fund, 2011/XXXX ........................................ 28,000,000 

National Defense Sealift Fund, 2012/XXXX ........................................ 14,000,000 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy, 2012/2014 .............................................. 30,000,000 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force, 2012/2014 ........................................ 443,000,000 

Missile Procurement, Air Force, 2012/2014 ......................................... 10,000,000 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy, 2013/2015 .............................................. 85,000,000 

Weapons Procurement, Navy, 2013/2015 ............................................. 5,000,000 

Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, 2013/2017 .................................. 68,000,000 

Other Procurement, Navy, 2013/2015 .................................................. 3,553,000 

Procurement, Marine Corps, 2013/2015 ............................................... 12,650,000 

Missile Procurement, Air Force, 2013/2015 ......................................... 60,000,000 

Other Procurement, Air Force, 2013/2015 ........................................... 38,900,000 

Procurement, Defense-Wide, 2013/2015 ............................................... 72,776,000 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army, 2013/2014 ...... 380,861,000 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy, 2013/2014 ...... 49,331,000 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force, 2013/2014 115,000,000 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
336 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide, 2013/ 

2014 ..................................................................................................... 213,000,000 

Ship Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment Fund, 2013/2014 1,414,500,000 

TRANSFER OF UNEXPENDED BALANCES

Pursuant to clause 3(f)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the bill contains a general provision which allows for the transfer of unexpended balances from the Operation 

and Maintenance and Military Personnel accounts to the ‘‘Foreign 

Currency Fluctuation, Defense’’ account to address shortfalls due to 

foreign currency fluctuation. 

DIRECTED RULE MAKING

This bill does not contain any provision that specifically directs 

the promulgation or completion of a rule. 

PROGRAM DUPLICATION

No provision of this bill establishes or reauthorizes a program of 

the Federal Government known to be duplicative of another Federal program, a program that was included in any report from the 

Government Accountability Office to Congress pursuant to section 

21 of Public Law 111–139, or a program related to a program identified in the most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. 

STATEMENT OF GENERAL PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Pursuant to clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the following is a statement of general performance goals and objectives for which this measure authorizes funding: 

The Committee on Appropriations considers program performance, including a program’s success in developing and attaining 

outcome-related goals and objectives, in developing funding recommendations. 

COMPLIANCE WITH RULE XIII, CL. 3(E) (RAMSEYER RULE)

In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 

House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by the bill, 

as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets and existing law in which no 

change is proposed is shown in roman): 

SECTION 8159 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2002 

(Division A of Public Law 107–117) 

SEC. 8159. MULTI-YEAR AIRCRAFT LEASE PILOT PROGRAM. 

(a) * * * 

(c) Under the aircraft lease Pilot Program authorized by this section: 

(1)* * * 

* * * * * * * 

ø(7) Not later than 1 year after the date on which the first aircraft is delivered under this Pilot Program, and yearly thereafter 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
337 

on the anniversary of the first delivery, the Secretary shall submit 

a report to the congressional defense committees describing the status of the Pilot Program. The Report will be based on at least 6 

months of experience in operating the Pilot Program.¿ 

* * * * * * * 

EARMARK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Neither the bill nor the report contains any congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined in 

Clause 9 of rule XXI. 

COMPARISON WITH THE BUDGET RESOLUTION

Clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires an explanation of compliance with section 

308(a)(1)(A) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 

Act of 1974 (Public Law 93–344), as amended, which requires that 

the report accompanying a bill providing new budget authority contain a statement detailing how that authority compares with the 

reports submitted under section 302 of the Act for the most recently agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget for the fiscal 

year from the Committee’s section 302(a) allocation. This information follows: 

(in millions of dollar) 

302(b) Allocation This bill 

Budget authority Outlays Budget authority Outlays 

Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations 

to its subcommittees: Subcommittee on Defense 

Discretionary: 

General Purpose ........................................................... 512,522 543,698 512,522 1 543,685 

Overseas Contingency Operations 2 ............................. 85,769 46,707 85,769 42.994 

Mandatory ............................................................................. 514 514 514 514 

1 Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority. 

2 Overseas Contingency Operations/Global War on Terrorism. 

FIVE-YEAR OUTLAY PROJECTIONS

In compliance with section 308(a)(1)(B) of the Congressional 

Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (Public Law 93– 

344), as amended, the following table contains five-year projections 

associated with the budget authority provided in the accompanying 

bill. 

(In millions of dollars) 

Non-OCO OCO 

Projection of outlays associated with the recommendation: 

2014 ........................................................................................................................................ 1 333,314 1 42,994 

2015 ........................................................................................................................................ 106,060 27,195 

2016 ........................................................................................................................................ 38,197 9,871 

2017 ........................................................................................................................................ 17,580 3,534 

2018 and future years ........................................................................................................... 12,477 1,311 

1 Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority. 

Note: OCO is Overseas Contingency Operations/Global War on Terrorism. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
338 

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

In accordance with section 308(a)(1)(C) of the Congressional 

Budget and Impoundment Act of 1974 (Public Law 93–344), as 

amended, no new budget or outlays are provided by the accompanying bill for financial assistance to State and local governments. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
339 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 62 here 81454.207

FULL COMMITTEE VOTES 

Pursuant to the provisions of clause 3(b) of rule XIll of the House of Representatives, the results 

of each roll call vote on an amendment or on the motion to report, together with the names of those voting 

for and those voting against, are printed below: 

ROLL CALL NO. 

Date: June 12, 2013 

Measure: Defense Appropriations Bill, FY 2014 

Motion by: Ms. Lowey 

Description of Motion: Motion to postpone consideration of the Defense Bill until .July 9,2013. 

Results: Defeated 16 yeas to 28 nays. 

lvfemhers Voting Yea 

Mr. Bishop 

Mr. Cuellar 

Ms. DeLauro 

Mr. Farr 

Mr. Fattah 

Ms. Lee 

Mrs. Lowey 

Ms. McCollum 

Mr. Moran 

Mr. Owens 

Ms. Pingree 

Mr. Price 

Mr. Schiff 

Mr. Serrano 

Mr. Visclosky 

Ms. Wassennan Schultz 

Members Voting Nay 

Mr. Aderholt 

Mr. Alexander 

Mr. Bonner 

Mr. Calvert 

Mr. Carter 

Mr. Cole 

Mr. Crenshaw 

Mr. Culberson 

Mr. Dent 

Mr. Diaz-Balart 

Mr. Fleischmann 

Mr. Fortenberry 

Mr. Frelinghuysen 

Ms. Granger 

Mr. Graves 

Dr. Harris 

Ms. Herrera Beutler 

Mr. Joyce 

Mr. Latham 

Mr. Nunnelee 

Mr. Rogers 

Mr. Rooney 

Mr. Simpson 

Mr. Valadao 

Mr. Wolf 

Mr. Womack 

Mr. Yoder 

Mr. Young 
340 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 63 here 81454.208

FULL COMMITTEE VOTES 

Pursuant to the provisions of clause 3(b) of rule XlIl of the House of Representatives, the 

results of each roll call vote on an amendment or on the motion to report, together with the names of 

those voting for and those voting against, are printed below: 

ROLL CALI. No.2 

Date: June 12,2013 

Measure: Defense Appropriations Bill, FY 2014 

Motion by: Mr. Price 

Description of Motion: Amendment to replace the 2013 and 2014 sequesters with revenue increases 

and spending reductions. 

Results: Defeated 22 yeas to 29 nays. 

Members Voting Yea 

Mr. Bishop 

Mr. Cuellar 

Ms. De Lauro 

Mr. Farr 

Mr. Fattah 

Mr. Honda 

Ms. Kaptur 

Ms. Lee 

Mrs. Lowey 

Ms. McCollum 

Mr. Moran 

Mr. Owens 

Mr. Pastor 

Ms. Pingree 

Mr. Price 

Mr. Quigley 

Ms. Roybal-Allard 

Mr. Ryan 

Mr. Schiff 

Mr. Serrano 

Mr. Visclosky 

Ms. Wasserman Schultz 

Members Voting Nay 

Mr. Aderholt 

Mr. Alexander 

Mr. Bonner 

Mr. Calvert 

Mr. Carter 

Mr.Cole 

Mr. Crenshaw 

Mr. Culberson 

Mr. Dent 

Mr. Diaz-Balart 

Mr. Fleischmann 

Mr. Fortenberry 

Mr. Frelinghuysen 

Ms. Granger 

Mr. Graves 

Dr. Harris 

Ms. Herrera Beutler 

Mr. Joyce 

Mr. Kingston 

Mr. Latham 

Mr. Nunnelee 

Mr. Rogers 

Mr. Rooney 

Mr. Simpson 

Mr. Valadao 

Mr. Wolf 

Mr. Womack 

Mr. Yoder 

Mr. Young 
341 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 64 here 81454.209

FULL COMMITTEE VOTES 

Pursuant to the provisions of clause 3(b) of rule XlII of the House of Representatives. the 

results of each roll call vote on an amendment or on the motion to report, together with the names of 

those voting for and those voting against, are printed below: 

ROLL CALl. NO, 3 

Datc: June 12. 2013 

Measure: Defense Appropriations Bill. FY 2014 

Motion by: Ms, Lee 

Description of Motion: Amendment to repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force, effective 

either on January 1,2015, or upon the conclusion of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, 

Results: 20 yeas to 3 I nays 

lv[embers Voting Yea 

Ms,DeLauro 

Mr. Farr 

Mr. Fatlah 

Mr. Honda 

Ms, Kaptm 

Ms, Lee 

Mrs, Lowey 

Ms, McCollum 

Mr. Moran 

Mr, Pastor 

Ms, Pingree 

Mr. Price 

Mr. Quigley 

Mr. Rooney 

Ms, Roybal-Allard 

Mr. Ryan 

Mr. Schiff 

Mr. Serrano 

Mr. Visclosky 

Ms, Wasserman Sehultz 

Memhers Voting Nay 

Mr. Aderholt 

Mr. Alexander 

Mr. Bishop 

Mr. Bonner 

Mr. Calvert 

Mr. Carter 

Mr. Colc 

Mr. Crenshaw 

Mr. Cuellar 

Me. Culberson 

Mr. Dent 

Mr. Diaz-Balart 

Mr. Fleischmann 

Mr. Fortenberry 

Mr. Frelinghuysen 

Ms. Granger 

Mr. Graves 

Dr. Harris 

Ms. Herrera Beutler 

Mr, Joyce 

Mr. Kingston 

Mr. Latham 

Mr. NunneJee 

Mr. Owens 

Mr. Rogers 

Mr. Simpson 

Mr. Valadao 

Mr. Wolf 

Mr. Womack 

Mr. Yoder 

Mr. Young 
342 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 65 here 81454.210

FULL COMMITTEE VOTES 

Pursuant to the provisions of clause 3(b) of rule XlIl of the House of Representatives, the 

results of each roll call vote on an amendment or on the motion to report, together with the names of 

those voting for and those voting against, are printed below: 

ROLL CALL NO. 4 

Date: June 12, 2013 

Measure: Defense Appropriations Bill, FY 2014 

Motion by: Mr. Moran 

Description of Motion: Amendment to strike sections 8108 and 8109, and amend section 8107, 

relating to the United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Results: Defeated 20 yeas to 31 nays. 

Members Voting Yea 

Mr. Bishop 

Ms. DeLauro 

Mr. Farr 

Mr. Fattah 

Mr. Honda 

Ms. Kaptur 

Ms. Lee 

Mrs. Lowey 

Ms. McCollum 

Mr. Moran 

Mr. Pastor 

Ms. Pingree 

Mr. Price 

Mr. Quigley 

Ms. Roybal-Allard 

Mr. Ryan 

Mr. Schiff 

Mr. Serrano 

Mr. Visclosky 

Ms. Wasserman Schultz 

lv/embers Voting Nay 

Mr. Aderholt 

Mr. Alexander 

Mr. Bonner 

Mr. Calvert 

Mr. Carter 

Mr.Cole 

Mr. Crenshaw 

Mr. Cuellar 

Mr. Culberson 

Mr. Dent 

Mr. Diaz-Balart 

Mr. Fleischmann 

Mr. Fortenberry 

Mr. Frelinghuysen 

Ms. Granger 

Mr. Graves 

Dr. Harris 

Ms. Herrera Beutler 

Mr. Joyce 

Mr. Kingston 

Mr. Latham 

Mr. Nunnelee 

Mr. Owens 

Mr. Rogers 

Mr. Rooney 

Mr. Simpson 

Mr. Valadao 

Mr. Wolf 

Mr. Womack 

Mr. Yoder 

Mr. Young 
343 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 66 here 81454.211

FULL COMMITTEE VOTES 

Pursuant to the provisions of clause 3(b) of rule Xlll of the House of Representatives, the 

results of each roll call vote on an amendment or on the motion to report. together with the names of 

those voting for and those voting against, are printed below: 

ROLL CALL NO. 5 

Date: June 12, 20 I 3 

Measure: Defense Appropriations Bill, FY 2014 

Motion by: Ms. Lee 

Description of Motion: Amendment to require a report, in classified and unclassified form, on all 

instances in which the Authorization for Use of Military Force has been invoked. 

Results: Defeated 19 yeas to 30 nays. 

Members Voting Yea 

Mr. Bishop 

Mr. Cuellar 

Ms. DeLauro 

Mr. Farr 

Mr. Honda 

Ms. Kaptur 

Ms. Lee 

Mrs. Lowey 

Ms. McCollum 

Mr. Moran 

Mr. Owens 

Mr. Pastor 

Ms. Pingree 

Mr. Price 

Mr. Quigley 

Ms. Roybal-Allard 

Mr. Ryan 

Mr. Schiff 

Mr. Serrano 

.Members Voting Nay 

Mr. Aderholt 

Mr. Alexander 

Mr. Bonner 

Mr. Calvert 

Mr. Carler 

Mr.Cole 

Mr. Crenshaw 

Mr. Culberson 

Mr. Dent 

Mr. Diaz-Balart 

Mr. Fleischmann 

Mr. Fortenberry 

Mr. Frelinghuysen 

Ms. Granger 

Mr. Graves 

Dr. Harris 

Ms. Herrera Beutler 

Mr. Joyce 

Mr. Kingston 

Mr. Latham 

Mr. Nunnelee 

Mr. Rogers 

Mr. Rooney 

Mr. Simpson 

Mr. Valadao 

Mr. Visclosky 

Mr. Wolf 

Mr. Womack 

Mr. Yoder 

Mr. Young 
344 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 67 here 81454.212

FULL COMMITTEE VOTES 

Pursuant to the provisions of clause 3(b) of rule XIIl of the House of Representatives, the 

results of each roll call vote on an amendment or on the motion to repol1, together with the names of 

those voting for and those voting against, are printed below: 

ROLL CALL NO. 6 

Date: June 12, 2013 

Measure: Defense Appropriations Bill, FY 2014 

Motion by: Ms. Lee 

Description of Motion: Amendment prohibiting ttll1ds lor the purpose of maintaining U.S. troops or 

Department of Defense contractors in Afghanistan after December 31, 2014. unless authorized by a 

separate Act of Congress. 

Results: Defeated 13 yeas to 35 nays. 

Members VotinR Yea 

Ms. De Lauro 

Mr. Farr 

Mr. Honda 

Ms. Kaptm 

Ms. Lee 

Mrs. Lowey 

Ms. McCollum 

Mr. Pastor 

Ms. Pingree 

Mr. Quigley 

Ms. Roybal-Allard 

Mr. Schiff 

Mr. Serrano 

Members Voting Nay 

Mr. Aderholt 

Mr. Alexander 

Mr. Bishop 

Mr. Bonner 

Mr. Calvert 

Mr. Cartcr 

Mr. Cole 

Mr. Crenshaw 

Mr. Cuellar 

Me Culberson 

Mr.Dent 

Mr. Diaz-Balart 

Mr. Fleischmann 

Mr. Fortenberry 

Mr. Frclinghuyscn 

Ms. Granger 

Mr. Graves 

Dr. Harris 

Ms. Herrera Beutler 

Mr. Joyce 

Mr. Kingston 

Mr. Latham 

Mr. Nunnelee 

Mr. Owens 

Mr. Price 

Mr. Rogers 

Mr. Rooney 

Mr. Ryan 

Mr. Simpson 

Mr. Valadao 

Mr. Visclosky 

Mr. Wolf 

Mr. Womack 

Mr. Yoder 

Mr. Young 
345 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 68 here 81454.213

FULL COMMITTEE VOTES 

Pursuant to the provisions of clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the House of Representativcs, the 

results of each roll call vote on an amendment or on the motion to report, together with the names of 

thosc voting for and those voting against, are printed below: 

ROLL CALL NO. 7 

Datc: June 12,2013 

Measure: Defense Appropriations Bill, FY 2014 

Motion by: Ms. De Lauro 

Description of Motion: Amendment to add a FY 2014 Departments of Labor, Health and Human 

Services, Education and Related Agencies Appropriations Act to the bill, with a text essentially 

identical to the enacted FY 2012 Labor, HHS. Education and Related Agencies Appropriations Act. 

Results: Defeated 21 yeas to 29 nays. 

iV/embers Voting Yea 

Mr. Bishop 

Mr. Cuellar 

Ms. De Lauro 

Mr. Farr 

Mr. Fattah 

Mr. Honda 

Ms. Kaptur 

Ms. Lee 

Mrs. Lowey 

Ms. McCollum 

Mr. Moran 

Mr. Owens 

Mr. Pastor 

Ms. Pingree 

Mr. Price 

Mr. Quigley 

Ms. Roybal-Allard 

Mr. Ryan 

Mr. SchilT 

Mr. Serrano 

Mr. Visclosky 

Afembers Voting Nay 

Mr. Aderholt 

Mr. Alexander 

Mr. Bonner 

Mr. Calvert 

Mr. Carter 

MLCole 

Mr. Crenshaw 

Mr. Culberson 

Mr. Dent 

Mr. Diaz-Balart 

Mr. Fleischmann 

Mr. Fortenberry 

Mr. Frelinghuysen 

Ms. Granger 

Mr. Graves 

Dr. Harris 

Ms. Herrera Beutler 

Mr. Joyce 

Mr. Kingston 

Mr. Latham 

tv'lr. Nunnelee 

Mr. Rogers 

Mr. Rooney 

Mr. Simpson 

Mr. Valadao 

Mr. Wolf 

Mr. Womack 

Mr. Yoder 

Mr. Young 

Insert offset folio 04 here 80986A.191rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

'Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

TITLE I 

MILITARY PERSONNEL 

Mi 1 i tary Personnel. Army .............................. Mi 1 i tary Personnel, Navy •..........•...•.•....•...•.•. 

Hi 1 i tary Personnel, Mari ne Corps ............ , , . , , . , ... 

Military Personnel, Air Force.".""""""."" .. " 

Reserve Personnel, Army .... , .... ,., ............ "., ... 

Reserve Per sonne 1, Navy .... , .... , ......... , .. ,.,., .... Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps.,." .......... ,' ...... Reserve Personnel, Air Force"" ...................... 

National Guard Personnel, Army .. "" ....... "." ...... National Guard Personnel, Air Force ....... ,., ,., ...... 

Total, Ti tl e I, Mil itary Personnel .. , ...... " ... 

TITLE II 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Operation and Maintenance, Army., ... , ........ ,. , ..... , Operation and Maintenance, Navy ..... ,., , .... ' .. , ..... . Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps .. , .. , .. ' ..... . Operation and Maintenance, Air Force,., .. , .. , .. ' ..... . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

40,199,263 

26,902,346 

12,531,549 

28,052,826 

4,456,823 

1 ,874,023 

658,251 

1,722,425 

7,981,577 

3,153,990 

FY 2014 

Request 

41,037,790 

27,824,444 

12,905,216 

28,519,877 

4,565,261 1,891,936 

677,499 

1 ,758,629 

8,041,268 

3,177,961 

Bill vs. B

Bi 11 Enacted 

40,908,919 +709,656 -1

27,671,555 +769,209 -1

12,826,857 +295,308 -

28,382,963 +330,137 -1

4,483,343 +26,520 -1,875,536 +1,513 -

665,499 +7,248 -

1,745,579 +23,154 -

7,958,568 -23,009 -

3,130,361 -23,629 -

______ _______ __ ________ _________________ 

• 

__ _. __ __

127,533,073 130,399,881 129,649,180 +2,116,107 -7

============== ============== ============== ============== =======

35,409,260 

41,614,453 

6,034,963 

34,780,406 

35,073,077 

39,945,237 

6,254,650 

37,270,842 

35,183,796 

40,127,402 

6,298,757 

37,438,701 

-225,464 

-1,487,051 

+263,794 

+2,658,295 

++

+

+

Insert offset folio 5 here 80986A.192rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

'Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide ............. . 

Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve .............. . 

Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve,. ,., ..... ,' , .. Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve, ..... . 

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve, .. , ..... . Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard., ..... . Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard ........ . Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Account ... , 

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces .. , 

Environmental Restoration, Army, ...... ""., ,. , .. ,.,., 

Environmental Restoration, Navy, .... , ... , ........ ,., .. Environmental Restoration, Air Force ... ,. ' .... , .... , 

Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide., ..... , .... ,., 

Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites 

Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid ... ,.,., Cooperative Threat Reduction Account, , .. , ....... , .. , .. 

Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce 

Deve 1 opment Fund ... ,.,., ...................... ,", .. 

Total, Title II, Operation and maintenance ... ,., 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

31,862,980 

3,182,923 

1,256,347 

277,377 

3,261,324 

7,154,161 

6,494,326 

13,516 

335,921 

310,594 

529,263 

11,133 

287,543 

108,759 

519,111 

50,198 

173,494,558 

FY 2014 

Request 

32,997,693 

3,095,036 

1,197,752 

263,317 

3,164,607 

7,054,196 

6,566,004 

5,000 

13,606 

298,815 

316,103 

439,820 

10,757 

237,443 

109,500 

528,455 

256,031 

175,097,941 

Bill 

32,301,685 

3,199,151 

1,200,283 

266,561 

3,149,046 

7,102,113 

6,675,999 

13,606 

298,815 

316,103 

439,820 

10,757 

262,443 

109,500 

528,455 

51,031 

174,974,024 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

+438,705 

+16,228 

-56,064 -10,816 

-112,278 

-52,048 

+181,673 

+90 

-37,106 

+5,509 

-89,443 

-376 

-25,100 

+741 

+9,344 

+833 

+1,479,466 

B

-6

+

-

+

+

+

-2

-1

============== ============== ============== ============== =======

Insert offset folio 6 here 80986A.193rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

'Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 DMB ATB 

TITLE 111 

PROCUREMENT 

Ai rcraft Procurement. Army ........................... . 

Hi ssi 1 e Procurement. Army ............................ . 

Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles. 

Army ............................................ ". , 

Procurement of Ammunition. Army ......... ,. ,., ' ... ,' ,., 

Other Procurement. Army .... , .. " .. " ... " .... ",., ... . 

Aircraft Procurement. Navy .. "", .. "." ...... ,.,., .. . 

Weapons Procurement. Navy ... "", ... , ...... , .. ,., .... . 

Procurement of Ammunition. Navy and Marine Corps,.,.,. 

Shi pbuil di n9 and Conversi on. Navy ... ,., ..... , ....... " 

Advanced appropriation FY 2015 .. ", ........... ,.,. 

Other Procurement. Navy ..... , ,., ., .. ' ........... ,', .. . 

Procurement. Mari ne Corps .. , ......... , ............ , .. . 

Ai rcraft Procurement. Ai r Force .. , ... , , ............ , .. 

Coast Guard (by transfer) .... , ... , , .. , ......... , ,. 

Mi ssi 1 e Procurement. Ai r Force ....... , , ............ , , . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

6.028.754 

1.535.433 1.857.823 1.641.306 

5.741.664 

17.382.152 

3.036.871 

659.897 

15.584.212 

5.955.078 

1.411.411 

11.774.019 

4.962.376 

FY 2014 

Request 

5.024.387 

1.334.083 

1.597.267 1.540.437 

6.465.218 

17,927.651 

3.122.193 

589.267 

14.077.804 

952.739 

6.310.257 

1.343.511 

11,398.901 

5.343.286 

Bill 

5.236.653 

1.628,083 

1.545.560 

1.465.937 

6.467,751 

17.092.784 

3.017.646 

544.116 

15.000.704 

6,824.824 

1.271.311 

10.860.606 

5.267.119 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

-792.101 

+92.650 

-312.263 -175.369 

+726.087 

-289.368 

-19.225 

-115.781 -583.508 

+869.746 

-140.100 -913.413 

+304,743 

B

+2+2

--

-8-1

-

+9

-9

+5

-

-5

-

Insert offset folio 7 here 80986A.194rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

'Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force ................. . 

Other Procurement, Air Force ......................... . 

Procurement, Defense-Wi de ........................... . 

Defense Production Act Purchases .................... . 

Total, Title III, Procurement .................. . 

FY 2014 .................................... . 

TITLE IV 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION 

Research. Development, Test and Evaluation, Army ..... . Research, Development. Test and Evaluation, Navy ..... . Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force. Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, 

Defense-Wide ...................................... . 

Operational Test and Evaluation. Defense ............. . 

Total, Title IV, Research, Development, Test and 

Evaluation ................................... . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

594,694 

17,082,508 

4,878,985 

223,531 

100,350,714 

(100,350,714) 

8,676,627 

16,963,398 

25,432,738 

18,631,946 

223,768 

69,928,477 

FY 2014 

Request 

759,442 

16,760,581 

4.534,083 

25,135 

99,106,242 

(98,153.503) 

7,989,102 

15,974,780 

25,702,946 

17,667,108 

186,300 

67,520,236 

Bill 

743,442 

16,791,497 

4,522,990 

75,135 

98,356,158 

(98,356,158) 

7,961,486 

15,368,352 

24,947,354 

17,885,538 

246,800 

66,409,530 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

+148,748 

-291,011 

-355,995 -148,396 

-1,994,556 

(-1,994,556) 

-715,141 

-1,595,046 

-485,384 -746,408 

+23,032 

-3,518,947 

B

-

+

-

+

-7

(+2

-

-6-7

+2

+

-1,1

Insert offset folio 8 here 80986A.195rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

'Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

TITLE V 

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS 

Defense Worki ng Cap; tal Funds ........................ . 

National Defense Sealift Fund ........................ . 

Total, Title V, Revolving and Management Funds .. 

TITLE VI 

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS 

Defense Health Program: 

Operation and maintenance ........................ . 

Procurement ......................... , ............ . Research, development, test and evaluation ....... . 

Total, Defense Health Program 1/ ....••••.•..•... 

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense: 

Operation and maintenance ........................ . 

Procurement ...................................... . 

Research, development, test and evaluation ....... . 

Total, Chemi cal Agents 21 ..•................... 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

1.516,184 

697,840 

2,214,024 

FY 2014 

Request 

1.545,827 

730,700 

2,276,527 

Bill 

1,545,827 

595,700 

2,141,527 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

+29,643 

-102,140 

-72,497 

B

-1-1

============== ::;==::::====: ============== ============== =======

30,885,165 31.653.734 31,566,688 +681,523 -

521,762 671,181 671,181 +149,419 

1,308,377 729,613 1,335,713 +27,336 +6

------------.- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------

32,715,304 33,054,528 33,573,582 +858,278 +5

635,843 451.572 451,572 -184,271 

18,592 1,368 1,368 -17,224 

647,351 604,183 604,183 -43,168 

---.---------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------

1,301,786 1.057.123 1,057,123 -244,663 

Insert offset folio 9 here 80986A.196rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

'Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense 

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund .................. . 

Office of the Inspector General 1/ ................... . 

Total, Title VI, Other Department of Defense 

Programs ..................................... . 

TITLE VII 

RELATED AGENCIES 

Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability 

System Fund ........................................ . 

Intelligence Community Management Account (IGMA) ..... . 

Total, Title VII, Related agencies ............. . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

1,159,263 

350,321 

35,526,674 

514,000 534,421 

1,048,421 

FY 2014 

Request 

938,545 

98,800 

312,131 

35,461,127 

514 ,000 

568,271 

1,082,271 

Bill 

007,762 

347,000 

35,985,467 

514,000 552,535 

1,066,535 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

-151,501 

-3,321 

+458,793 

+18,114 

+18,114 

B

+

+

+

-

============== ============== ============== ============== =======

Insert offset folio 10 here 80986A.197rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

*Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMS ATB 

TITLE VIII 

GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Additional transfer authority (Sec.S005) ............. . 

Indian Financing Act incentives (Sec.8019) ........... . 

FFRDC (Sec. 8023) ..................................... . 

Rescissions (Sec.8040) ............................... . 

O&M, Defense-wide transfer authority (Sec.8051) ...... . O&M, Army transfer authority ......................... . 

Global Security Contingency Fund (O&M, Defense-wide 

transfer) (Sec.8068) .............................. . 

Fisher House Foundation (Sec.8069) ................... . 

National grants (Sec.S077) ........................... . 

Shipbuilding & conversion funds, Navy (Sec.8082) ..... . 

ICMA transfer authority (Sec. 8088) ................... . 

Fisher House transfer authority (Sec.8093) ........... . 

Defense Health O&M transfer authority (Sec.8098) ..... . 

Ship Modernization, Operations and 

Sustai nment Fund ................................... . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

(4,000,000) 

15,000 

-2,142.447 

(30,000) 

(133,381) 

(200,000) 

4,000 

44,000 

8.000 

(20,000) (11,000) 

(139,204) 

2,382,100 

FY 2014 

Request 

(4,000,000) 

(30,000) 

(200,000) 

8,000 

(20,000) (11,000) 

(143,087) 

Bi 11 

(4,000,000) 

15,000 

-40,000 

-3,043,571 

(30,000) 

(200,000) 

4,000 

44,000 

8,000 

(20,000) (11,000) 

(143,087) 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

-40,000 

-901,124 

(-133,381) 

(+3,883) 

-2,382,100 

B

+

-3,0

+

Insert offset folio 11 here 80986A.198rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

'Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMS ATB 

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide (Sec.8102) ... . 

(transfer authority) ............................... . 

Civilian pay reduction (Sec.8116) .................... . 

Special Victims Program implementation (Sec.8122) .... . 

A-12 Aircraft litigation in-kind settlement .......... . 

Military pay raise (Sec. 8126) ...................... .. 

Total, Title VIII, General Provisions .......... . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

270,000 

-72,718 

507,935 

FY 2014 

Request 

(273,300) 

150,000 158,000 

Bill 

(146,568) 

-437,000 

25,000 

580,000 

-2,844,571 

Bill vs. B

Enacted 

-270,000 

(+146,568) (-1

-364,282 -4

+25,000 +

-1

+580,000 +5

-3,352,506 -3,0

============== ============== ============== ============== =======

TITLE IX 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) 31 

Military Personnel 

Mil itary Personnel, Army (OCO) ...................... .. 9,790,082 6,747,515 6,703,006 -3,087,076 

Military Personnel, Navy (OCO) ....................... . 774,225 558,344 558,344 -215,881 Military Personnel, Marine Corps (OCO) ............... . 1,425,156 1,019,322 1,019,322 ·405,834 Military Personnel, Air Force (OCO) ...... , ........... . 1,286,783 867,087 867,087 -419,696 

Reserve Personnel. Army (OCO) ........................ . 156,893 40,952 40,952 -115,941 

Reserve Personnel, Navy (OCO) ........................ . 39,335 20,238 20,238 ·19,097 

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps (OCO) ................ . 24,722 15,134 15,134 -9,588 Reserve Personnel, Air Force (OCO) ................... . 25,348 20,432 20,432 -4,916 

National Guard Personnel, Army (OCO) ................. . 583,804 393,364 393,364 -190,440 National Guard Personnel, Air Force (OeO) ............ . 10,473 6,919 6,919 -3,554 

Total, Mil itary Personnel ...................... . 14,116,821 9,689,307 9,644,798 -4,472,023 -

Insert offset folio 12 here 80986A.199rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

'Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

Operation and Maintenance 

Operation & Maintenance, Army (OCO) .................. . Operation & Maintenance, Navy (OeD) .................. . 

Coast Guard (by transfer) (OCO) ................ . 

Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps (OeD) .......... . Operation & Maintenance, Air Force (OeD) ............. . Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide (OCO) .......... . 

Coalition support funds (OCO) .................. . 

Operation & Maintenance, Army Reserve (OeD) .......... . Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve (OeD) .......... . 

Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve 

(OeD) ............................................ . 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve 

(OeD) ............................................ . 

Operation & Maintenance, Army National Guard 

(OeD) ............................................ . 

Operation & Maintenance, Air National Guard 

(OCO) ............................................ . 

Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund (OeD) .. . 

Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance ............ . 

Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund (OeO) ................ . Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (OeO) ............... . 

Total, Operation and Maintenance ............... . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

28,452.018 

5,839,934 

4,116.340 

9.249,736 

7,714,079 

(1,650,000) 

157,887 

55,924 

25.477 

60,618 

392,448 

34,500 

582,884 

56,681,845 

325.000 

5,124,167 

62,131,012 

FY 2014 

Request 

29,279,633 

6,067,993 

(227,033) 

2,669,815 

10,005.224 

6,435,078 

(1,500,000) 

42,935 

55,700 

12,534 

32,849 

199,371 

22,200 

54,823,332 

279,000 

7,726,720 

62,829,052 

Bi 11 

30,929,633 

6,255,993 

(227,033) 

2,669,815 

10,605,224 

6,240,437 

(1,500,000) 

42,935 

55,700 

12,534 

32,849 

199,371 

22,200 

1,073,800 

58,140,491 

279,000 

7,726,720 

66,146,211 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

+2,477,615 

+416,059 

(+227,033) 

-1,446,525 

+1,355.488 

-1,473.642 

(-150,000) 

-114,952 

-224 

-12,943 

-27,769 

-193,077 

-12,300 

+490,916 

-

+1,458,646 

-46,000 

+2,602,553 +4,015,199 

B

+1,6

+

+6

-1

+1,0

+3,3+3,3

Insert offset folio 13 here 80986A.200rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

·Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

Procurement 

Ai rcraft Procurement, Army (OCO) .................... .. 

Missi le Procurement, Army (OCO) ...................... . 

Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, 

Army (OCO) ......................................... . 

Procurement of Ammunition, Army (OCO) ................ . 

Other Procurement, Army (OCO) ........................ . 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy (OCO) .................... .. 

Weapons Procurement, Navy (OCO) ...................... . 

Procurement of Ammunition. Navy and Marine Corps., ... , 

(OCO) ............................................ . 

Other Procurement, Navy (OCO) ........................ . 

Procurement, Marine Corps (OCO) ...................... . 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force (OCO) ................ . 

Missile Procurement, Air Force (OCO) ................. . 

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force (OCO) ........... . 

Other Procurement, Air Force (OCO) ....... , ........... . 

Procurement, Defense-Wide (OCO) ................. , .... . 

National Guard and Reserve Equipment (OCO) ........... . 

Total. Procurement ............................. . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

550,700 

67,951 

15,422 

338,493 

1,740,157 

215,698 

22,500 

283,059 

98,882 

822,054 

305,600 

34,350 

116,203 

2,680,270 

188,099 

1,500,000 

8,979,438 

FY 2014 

Request 

771,788 

128,645 180,900 

603,123 

240,696 

86,500 

206,821 

17,968 

129,584 115,668 

24,200 

159,965 

2,574,846 

111,275 

5,351,979 

Bill 

771,788 

154,532 

15,422 

190,382 

909,825 

240,696 

86,500 

169,362 

17,968 

125,984 188,868 

24,200 

137,826 

2,524,846 

128,947 

1,500,000 

7,187,146 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

+221,088 

+86,581 

-148,111 -830,332 

+24,998 +64,000 

-113,697 

-80,914 

-696,070 -116,732 

-10,150 

+21,623 

-155,424 

-59,152 

-1,792,292 

B

+

+

+

-

+

--

+

+1,5+1,8

Insert offset folio 14 here 80986A.201rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

'Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation 

Research. Development, Test & Evaluation, Army 

(OCO) .. , ... ,."."., ........ ,." .... , .. ,., ..... ,' . 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy 

(OCO).,.,', .. , .. ,', ............ , ................. . 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force 

(OeO) .................... , .............. ,., ..... .. 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, 

Defense-Wi de (OeD)"." ... ,.,", .. ,.,", ....... , .. ,. 

Total, Research, Development, Test and 

Evaluation ..... ,. " .. , .. " . , .. , """" .... , ., 

Revolving and Management Funds 

Defense Working Capital Funds (OCO) .. , "',.,." .... ,.' 

Other Department of Defense Programs 

Defense Health Program: 

Operation and maintenance (OCO) .. , ........ , ...... , .. 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

29,660 

52,519 53,150 

112,387 

FY 2014 

Request 

7,000 

34,426 

9,000 

66,208 

Bill 

7,000 

34,426 

9,000 

66,208 

Bill vs, 

Enacted 

-22,660 -18,093 -44,150 -46,179 

B

-------------- -------

247,716 116,634 116,634 ·131,082 

243,600 264,910 264,910 +21,310 

993,898 904,201 904,201 -89,697 

Insert offset folio 15 here 80986A.202rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

'Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense 

(OeO) ............................................ . 

Joint lED Defeat Fund (OCO) 2/ ......... •.............. Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund (OCO) ............ . 

Office of the Inspector General (OCO) ................ . 

Total, Other Department of Defense Programs ..... 

TITLE IX General Provisions 

Additional transfer authority (OCO) (Sec.9002) ...... " 

Rescissions (OCO) (Sec.9013), ...... , .......... , ...... . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

469,025 

1,622,614 

10,766 

3,096,303 

(3,500,000) 

-1,860,052 

FY 2014 

Request 

376,305 

1,000,000 

15,000 

10,766 

2,306,272 

(4,000,000) 

-1,279,252 

Bill 

376,305 

1,000,000 

10,766 

2,291,272 

(4,000,000) 

-46,022 

Bill vs. B

Enacted 

-92,720 

-622,614 

-

-805,031 -

(+500,000) 

+1,814,030 +1,2

-------------- -------

Total, General Provi sions ...................... . -1,860,052 -1,279,252 -46,022 +1,814,030 +1,2

-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------

Total, Titl e IX 86,954,838 

Total for the bill (net)... ...... ..... .......... 597,558,714 

Less appropriations for subsequent years ... . 

Total for the bi 11 (net)........................ 597,558,714 

79,278,902 

590,381 ,127 

-952,739 

589,428,388 

85,604,949 -1,349,889 

591,342,799 -6,215,915 591,342,799 -6,215,915 

+6,3

+9+9

+1,9

Insert offset folio 16 here 80986A.203rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

-Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

OTHER APPROPRIATIONS 

DISASTER RELIEF APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2013 

Operation and Maintenance (emergency) ................ . 

Procurement (emergency) .............................. . 

Defense working capital funds (emergency) ............ . 

Total, FY 2013 Disaster Relief (PL 113-2) ....... 

Total, Other Appropriations .................... . 

Net grand total ................................ . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

62,825 

1,310 

24,200 

88,335 88,335 

597,647,049 

FY 2014 

Request 

589,428,388 

Bi 11 

591,342,799 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

·62,825 

·1,310 

·24,200 

-88,335 

·88,335 

-6,304,250 

B

+1,9

Insert offset folio 17 here 80986A.204rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

'Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET RECAP 

Scorekeeping adjustments: 

Lease of defense real property (permanent) ....... . 

Disposal of defense real property (permanent) .... . DHP, O&M to DOD-VA Joint Incentive Fund: 

Defense funct ion ............................. . 

Non-defense function ......................... . 

DHP, O&M to Joint DOD-VA Medical Facility 

Demonstration Fund: 

Defense function ............................. . 

Non-defense function ......................... . 

O&M, Defense-wide transfer to Department of State: 

Defense function ............................. . 

Non-defense function ......................... . 

Tricare accrual (permanent, indefinite auth.) 4/ •. 

(OCO) 3/ ...•.....•..•.•.•..•...•....•.•.•.•.•. 

Title IX rescissions (CBO adjustment) ............ . 

OCD appropri at ions ........................... . 

Base appropri ations .......................... . 

Less emergency appropriations .................. . 

ATB security (DivD Sec3001) (CBO adjustment) ..... . 

Total, seorekeeping adjustments .............. . 

Adjusted total (includ. scorekeeping adjustments) 

Appropriati ons ............................. . 

Resei ssi ons ................................ . 

Total mandatory and di scretionary .................... . 

FY 2013 

Enacted 22,000 

9,000 

-15.000 

15,000 

-139,204 

139,204 

-100,000 

100,000 

8,026,000 

271,000 

-88,335 

-515.000 

FY 2014 

Request 

30.000 

10,000 

-15.000 

15.000 

-143, 087 

143.087 

-50,000 

50.000 

7.258.000 

164,000 

257,681 

1,021,571 

-1,021,571 

Bill vs. B

Bill Enacted 

30.000 +8.000 

10,000 +1,000 

-15.000 

15,000 

-143,087 -3,883 

143,087 +3,883 

-50,000 +50,000 

50,000 -50,000 

7,258,000 -768,000 

164,000 -107,000 

-2

-1,0

+1,0

+88,335 

+515,000 

-------

7,724,665 7,719,681 7,462,000 -262,665 -2

============== ============== ============== ============== =======

605,371,714 597,148,069 598,804,799 -6.566,915 +1,6

(607.514.161) (598,169,640) (601,848,370) (-5.665,791) (+3,6

(-2,142,447) (-1,021,571 ) (-3,043,571) (-901,124) (-2,0

============== ============== ============== ============== =======

605,371 ,714 597,148,069 598,804.799 -6,566,915 +1,6

Insert offset folio 18 here 80986A.205rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING

o 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2013 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 20

(Amounts in Thousands) 

"Enacted level does not include the Sec. 251A sequester or Sec. 3004 OMB ATB 

RECAPITULATION 

Title I - Military Personnel ......................... . Title II - Operation and Maintenance ................. . 

Tit 1 e I II - Procurement .............................. . 

Title IV - Research, Development, Test and Evaluation. Title V - Revolving and Management Funds ............. . Title VI - Other Department of Defense Programs ...... . Title VII - Related Agencies ......................... . Title VIII - General Provisions (net) ................ . Title IX - Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) ..... . 

Total, Department of Defense ................. . 

Scorekeepi ng adj ustments ....................... . 

Less appropriations for subsequent years .. 

Total mandatory and discretionary .............. . 

FOOTNOTES: 

11 Included in Budget under Operation and Maintenance 

21 Included in Budget under Procurement 

31 Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) 

41 Contributions to Department of Defense Retiree 

Health Care Fund (Sec. 725, P.L. 108-375)(CBO est) 

FY 2013 

Enacted 

127,533,073 173,494,558 

100,350,714 

69,928,477 

2,214,024 

35,526,674 

1,048,421 

507,935 

86,954,838 

597,558,714 

7,724,665 

605,371,714 

FY 2014 

Request 

130,399,881 175,097,941 

99,106,242 67,520,236 

2,276,527 

35,461,127 

1,082,271 

158,000 

79,278,902 

590,381,127 

7,719,681 

-952,739 

597,148,069 

Bill 

129,649,180 174,974,024 

98,356,158 66,409,530 

2,141,527 

35,985,467 

1,066,535 

-2,844,571 

85,604,949 

591,342,799 

7,462,000 

598.804,799 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

+2,116,107 +1,479,466 

-1,994,556 -3,518,947 

-72,497 

+458,793 

+18,114 

-3,352,506 -1,349,889 -6,215,915 

-262,665 

-6,566,915 

B

-7

-1-7

-1,1

-1

+

-3,0

+6,3

+

-2

+

+1,6
(361) 

ADDITIONAL VIEWS—FY 2014 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

APPROPRIATIONS BILL 

With this bill, the Committee has carried out its Constitutional 

responsibility to recommend the appropriations necessary to provide for the common defense of our Nation. The Committee carried 

out its work in a collegial and bipartisan fashion consistent with 

longstanding traditions of the Committee. 

The bill provides $512.5 billion in new budget authority covering 

all Department of Defense and Intelligence Community functions 

except for Military Construction and Family Housing. This is $3.4 

billion below the President’s request, and $5.2 billion below last 

year’s enacted level. 

This level of funding is sufficient for the security of the Nation 

and is responsive to the needs of the troops. However, this funding 

level is inconsistent with the underlying assumption behind the 

overall appropriations 302(b) allocation. The majority allocated only 

$967 billion, instead of $1.058 trillion, for all the Fiscal Year (FY) 

2014 appropriation bills; under the Budget Control Act (BCA), the 

lower level assumes the sequester remains in place. Yet this bill ignores the BCA’s sequester cap on defense funding, exceeding that 

firewall by almost $50 billion. Even if we enacted the $512.5 billion 

level in this bill, it would be cut back down to the cap level absent 

an agreement to end the sequester. 

The bill makes the best resource decisions allowable under the 

given allocation necessary to address the readiness of U.S. forces 

and minimize the problems that began due to late enactment of the 

FY 2013 bill, shortfalls that emerged in Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), and the initial effects of sequestration. This is evident in Committee recommended increases related to shortfalls in 

facility maintenance, equipment reset, and due to the price of fuel. 

The bill also begins to address the epidemic of sexual assault in the military. In addition to the budget request, the bill adds $25 

million for a Sexual Assault Special Victims Advocate program and 

reinforces the recommendations included in the FY 2014 Housepassed National Defense Authorization Act. 

While the need for prevention is recognized by the Defense Department’s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office’s 

(SAPRO) focus on training, results to date, including an estimated 

26,000 unwanted sexual contacts in FY 2012, clearly show that 

more must be done. The prevalence of sexual assaults at the military academies indicates the SAPRO’s training regimen has not influenced a culture that must be changed. 

The Department of Defense must reach beyond internal resources and better screen both personnel who recruit and train 

service members and those charged with preventing and responding to sexual assault. This bill includes language and funding to respond to sexual assault in the military. While essential, these 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
362 

words and dollars must be matched by the leadership of our military officials to change the culture that is enabling such outrageous 

behavior. 

Another shortcoming in this bill, especially in light of the President’s speech at the National Defense University on May 23, 2013, 

is the absence of a new approach for the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. It is increasingly clear that the Committee and 

the Congress in general must find a way to break the stalemate 

that keeps the facility operating in its present capacity. 

The status quo has produced an untenable result: a form of purgatory where these individuals may be detained indefinitely. The 

original premise for opening Guantanamo, that detainees would 

not be able to challenge their detention, was found unconstitutional 

five years ago. In the meantime, the Guantanamo detention facility 

has stained U.S. standing around the globe and become a symbol 

that America selectively observes the rule of law. In addition, it is 

a recruitment tool for extremists and hurts cooperation with other 

nations. 

Today, the facility still holds 166 detainees without charge. Some 

have been held for as long as a decade. Over half of the detainee 

population has been cleared for release, but remain in custody due 

to the constraints imposed by current law. In contrast, transfers 

were once a regular occurrence. During the previous administration, 530 detainees were transferred from Guantanamo with congressional support. 

In addition to transfers, both the current and previous administrations have relied on U.S. courts to convict hundreds of people for 

terrorism or terrorism-related offenses. This record of success, together with the prospect for military tribunals in the most egregious cases, as suggested in the Attorney General’s Northwestern 

University speech in 2012, clearly indicate the U.S. has the means 

to handle detainees in a manner that is not contradictory to our 

fundamental legal principles. It is possible, in this bill, to take a 

significant step toward this objective. 

This bill also lacks an end to the sequester. According to the 

June 2013 DoD Report on the Joint Committee Sequestration for 

FY 2013, during the remainder of FY 2013, $36.2 billion will be sequestered from the accounts in the DoD Appropriations bill and an 

additional $1 billion will be sequestered from Military Construction 

and Family Housing. The majority of the reduction, $20.3 billion, 

will come from the operation and maintenance accounts. These reductions will continue to diminish the readiness of U.S. forces. 

Should sequestration apply in FY 2014, approximately $52 billion would be cut from the Defense Department. Based on the practice adopted in FY 2013, it seems likely that OCO will be spared 

from sequestration to ensure full support of deployed forces. As a 

result, the full burden of sequestration will fall on the DoD’s base 

budget of $512.5 billion. Two fundamental problems stem from 

this. First, for the remainder of FY 2013, DoD will have to defer 

and curtail other activities such as readiness related training that, 

in time, will hurt the forces next to deploy. Second, in FY 2014, 

DoD will be further constrained with opportunities to defer activities being exhausted, leading to greater impacts on readiness and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
363 

modernization programs. Sequestration in FY 2014 will counteract 

the many beneficial resourcing decisions included in this bill. 

With respect to the appropriations process, these wounds are 

self-inflicted and correctable. On each FY 2014 Appropriations bill 

reported out of Full Committee to date, amendments have been 

proposed, but rejected, to replace sequestration. Since the passage 

of the BCA in August 2011, sequestration has been universally regarded as destructive and poor public policy. It hurts the effective 

operations of government including military training and readiness 

as well as the modernization programs that support both current 

operations and maintain the industrial base needed to respond to 

future contingencies. Given the opportunities at hand, the Committee should take the corrective action needed to address this 

problem. 

Although the bill leaves several significant, long-term issues 

waiting for solutions, it is necessary and timely. The recommendations in this bill, viewed in isolation from the allocation issues 

noted above, were prepared in a thoughtful manner that represents 

the best traditions of the Committee. 

NITA M. LOWEY. 

PETER J. VISCLOSKY. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(364) 

ADDITIONAL VIEWS OF THE HONORABLE ROSA L. DELAURO

I want to acknowledge the work Chairmen Rogers and Young 

and Ranking Members Lowey and Visclosky have put in to produce 

a bipartisan defense appropriations bill. I support a defense bill, 

but we are operating in an environment where what is done on the 

defense bill has a direct effect on programs that benefit children, 

families and the sick. I believe the committee missed the chance to 

show real leadership for American families when it rejected my 

amendment to add the bipartisan-backed Labor-HHS appropriation 

measure enacted for FY 2012 to the defense appropriations bill. 

When this Labor-H measure was enacted in 2011, an overwhelming majority of this Committee—41 of 51 Members, including 

23 Republicans and 18 Democrats—voted for it. The deficit then 

was almost $1.1 trillion. Now, it is projected to be $642 billion. In 

other words, if we could afford this bipartisan-agreed-upon funding 

level then, we can definitely afford it now that the deficit has been 

reduced by over 40%. 

There is a clear precedent for this action under the current Majority. When the Labor-H bill was enacted for FY 2012, the defense 

bill was coupled with it as part of a larger omnibus appropriations 

package. The amendment I offered in Committee would have simply repeated that process up front, in order to ensure that the fundamental education, health and labor priorities get a vote. Otherwise, I am not assured they will ever be brought before this committee. They never have under this Majority, and the Chairman 

has deftly avoided my questions on his intentions for this year. 

Some in the House Majority argued that this amendment violates the 302(b)s. It did. But these caps set by the House Majority 

can easily be changed. And it seems beside the point to argue about 

the 302(b)s when the Defense bill reported by the committee is in 

violation of the Budget Control Act (BCA), which is the law of the 

land. 

The BCA, after sequestration, caps defense spending at $498 bil- lion and non-defense spending at $469 billion. This defense bill provides $14.2 billion above the defense cap on this bill alone—and is 

almost $26 billion over if you count defense spending already approved in the MilCon/VA and Homeland Security bills passed by 

the House. That is before we even consider Energy and Water, 

which includes substantial defense funding. 

Now I am a supporter of defense funding and of the funding levels in this particular defense appropriations bill. However, I am not 

a supporter of making defense whole, so to speak, while shredding 

our domestic programs. I think we should work together to repeal 

the indiscriminate across-the-board sequester cuts and pass a 

budget that funds all of our fundamental priorities adequately. 

Some also made the argument that my amendment would have 

killed the defense bill. But my amendment did nothing to the deVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:00 Jun 18, 2013 Jkt 081454 PO 00000 Frm 00374 Fmt 6604 Sfmt 6604 E:\HR\OC\HR113.XXX HR113

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
365 

fense bill. Instead, it provided an opportunity to put a Labor-HHS 

bill on the floor again. 

The amendment I offered made no changes to what Congress 

passed for Labor-HHS-Education, in an overwhelming bipartisan 

fashion in 2011. If I had my way, I would change some funding levels and riders in the Labor-HHS bill for FY2012, but I put forward 

this amendment because it represented a previously-agreed-to bipartisan compromise on spending for Labor, Health, and Education 

programs, all of which are too important to continue being ignored 

by this Committee. 

We do not live in a world of defense and security only. We need 

to fund the critical programs that protect the public health and 

safety, promote and develop our workforce, and educate the next 

generation of Americans just as much as we need to provide sufficient funding for defense. And we should debate them with the 

same vigor that we debate defense funding. Indeed, it is our responsibility as members of Congress to do so. 

My amendment represented a bipartisan agreement that the Majority already agreed to for funding of labor, health and education 

programs. It seems that these days we cannot even agree to do 

today what we had agreed to do yesterday. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING