alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Williams Fork, Piceance Basin: 

Flowback Water Reuse – Quality anQuantity

Jill E. CooperEncana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.March 30, 2011
Williams Fork, Piceance Basin Water SPresentation Outline

Piceance Overview• Geology and Fracturing Necessities• Current Water Quality and Infrastructure• Source Inflow Volumes of Water• Outflows of Water
Piceance Basin – Williams Fork

• Geology

• Overpressure Reservoir• 3000’ Vertical Section• Shale, Sandstone, Coal Deposition• Avg Porosity 6%• Avg Permeability 7μD• Avg Water Saturation 65%• Frac Gradient 0.5-0.75 psi/ft

• Frac Characteristics

• Highly Naturally Fractured• High-Perm Formation Created When 

Hydraulically Fractured
Why Produced Water

• Formation Needs

• Proppant

• High Perm Fractured Environment• Low/No Proppant

• Gels

• Cause Damage to Formation• Not Needed For Proppant Transport• Not Needed For Fracture Height Growth

• Water

• Clay Swelling Not an Issue• Very Little Fines Migration• Compatibility
Example: Fracturing Fluid Compos

•“Slickwater” fracturing fluid 

•Water: 98.9% to 99.2% (average 

bbl/well)

•Sand (proppant): 0.7% to 1%•Other additives (combined): <0.09

•Fluid and water flowed back is eithe

and used as frac fluid (reducing fresusage) or disposed of in permitted i
Fresh vs Produced Water Study
Flowback Water Recovery

• 100% Recovery over Life of Well

0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 

Hours On (Hr)

% Recovery

75% Recovery in 

Typical Williams Fork We
Piceance Basin Water Strategy Water Recycling Composition

• North and South Piceance operations are interc• Produced and flowback water taken to central w

pipeline (where available) or water truck

• Water is treated for reuse

• Solids, iron and hydrocarbon levels decreased• Stored in tanks or large facility ponds• Water is chemically treated for scaling and to brea

• Water reused in completions operations

• Transport by pipeline or truck, within geologic bas• Disposal minimized where possible

• On average 90% - 95%, of the water used in Pic

is recycled; the balance is fresh water used in d



Piceance Basin Water Strategy Current Infrastructure (estimates)

Hunter Mesa Water Treatment Facility

• 40 miles of connected pipeline• 2 high pressure pumps• 310,000 bbl storage pond (13 million gallons ~ 40 

Benzel Water Treatment Facility

• 4 Miles of connected pipeline• 85,000 bbl storage pond (3.6 million gallons ~ 11 a

High Mesa Water Treatment Facility

• 40 miles of connected pipeline• 1 high pressure pumps• 208,000 bbl storage pond (8.7 million gallons ~ 27 

Middle Fork Water Facility

• 17 miles connected pipeline• 4 high pressure pumps• 217,000 bbl storage pond (9.1 million gallons ~ 28 

Water Quality & Treatment Typical Water Treatment Facility in th
Piceance Water Basin Strategy Secondary Water/Condensate/Solids 

• Dissolved Air Flotation - Solids and hydrocarbon rem• Oil/Water Separator – Hydrocarbon removal step
Piceance Basin Challenges & OpportuDissolved Air Flotation Results

90% Solids Reduction50% BOD Reduction

75% Iron Reduction

80

R
Questions?
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4116]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[Docket No. 070215037-7038-01]


Department of Commerce FY 2007-2012 Strategic Plan

AGENCY: Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department is updating its current FY 2004-2009 Strategic 
Plan. As part of this process, the Department is inviting comments on 
its draft FY 2007-2012 Strategic Plan.

DATES: Public comments on this document must be received at the 
appropriate mailing or e-mail address (see ADDRESSES) on or before 
April 9, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Please send comments to Mr. Stephen Shapiro, Chief, Systems, 
Policy, and Performance Division, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 5312, Washington, DC 20230. Comments may 
be submitted via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ea9999828b9a839885aa8e8589c48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a3939222b3a2338250a2e2529642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>. Commerce's draft Strategic 
Plan is posted at http://www.osec.doc.gov/bmi/budget/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William Tatter, phone 202-482-
5979, fax 202-482-2903, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3b1a7b2a7a7b6a193b7bcb0fdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f99b8d988d8d9c8bb99d969ad79e968f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Government Performance and Results 
Act of 1993, each Federal agency must develop a Strategic Plan 
describing the agency's mission, strategic goals, and those means and 
strategies that will be used to achieve the agency's mission for the 
current and next five years. The plan must, additionally, describe the 
relationship between annual performance goals and the agency's 
strategic goal framework. These Strategic Plans must be updated and 
reviewed at least every three years, a key part of which includes 
consultation with Congress and other interested and potentially 
affected parties.
    The draft FY 2007-2012 Strategic Plan updates the key challenges, 
means, and strategies documented in the FY 2004-2009 Strategic Plan. It 
also revises the goals, objectives, and outcomes to reflect current 
emphasis and to achieve greater consistency in style and format across 
the Department. Finally, it updates the measures used to track and 
report attainment of goals and objectives.

    Dated: March 2, 2007.
Neil K. Shapiro,
Deputy Director, Office of Budget.
 [FR Doc. E7-4116 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 55330.

#### M. S. Levy & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 612647-G, etc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of “8-bu” hats, valued at less than $3 per dozen, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Caradine Hat Co.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
EX-31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CEO 

EXHIBIT 31.1 

1. Chief Executive Officer 

CERTIFICATION 

I, John D. Aquilino, certify that:
1. 
I have reviewed this transition report on Form 10-KSB of ViaStar Holdings, Inc.; 
2. 
Based on my knowledge, this transition report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this transition report; 
3. 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this transition report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this transition report; 
4. 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  
a) 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this transition report is being prepared;  
b) 
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this transition report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  
c) 
presented in this transition report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 
5. 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  
a)
 
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  
b)
 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 
6. 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this transition report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.     
Dated: October 15, 2003
By:
 
/s/ JOHN D. AQUILINO 
 
 **John D. Aquilino**
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 22-40672 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Flavio Tamez, Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CR-418-1

______________________________

Before Wiener, Elrod , and Engelhardt , Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Defendant-Appellant Flavio Tamez, federal prisoner # 14812-379, appeals the denial of his motion for compassionate release, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Tamez focuses a majority of his brief on challenging the district court’s ho lding that COVID-19, family and community circumstances, rehabilitat ive efforts, and changing attitudes

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 31, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40672 Document: 00516696303 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2023No. 22-40672

2 toward marijuana did not amount to extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting early release. Employing liber al construction, Tamez also asserts that the district court abused its discre tion in denying his motion based on a balancing of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing fact ors, given that court’s “misstatement[s]” that he was involved in a conspiracy between 2003 and 2012, as well as that court’s failure to consider good-time credits when concluding that he had served less th an half of his 262-month sentence.
We review the district court’s de nial of a compassionate release motion for an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). Tamez’s a ssertions are incorrect because Tamez pleaded guilty to a superseding indictment charging him with a conspiracy that existed between 2003 and 2012. Al so, the district court correctly used the actual sentence imposed when de termining that Tamez had served 123 months (47%) of his 262-month sentence. See United States v. Rodriguez , 27 F.4th 1097, 1100 (5th Cir. 2022). Th e district court was also aware of Tamez’s good-time credits and explic itly noted them. Tamez may disagree with the way that the district court ba lanced the § 3553(a ) factors, but his disagreement does not provide su fficient grounds for reversal. See Chambliss , 948 F.3d at 694. Those are the reason s that we do not consider Tamez’s reasons for challenging the district cour t’s conclusion that he failed to show extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting relief. See Ward v. United States , 11 F.4th 354, 360–62 (5th Cir. 2021). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. Case: 22-40672 Document: 00516696303 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2023
#### William H. Tice, *Respondent, v.*Philetus R. Sloat, *Appellant.*

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Barnard, P. J.; Dykman, J., not sitting.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8431 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to provide regular updates to Livestock Indemnity Program payment rates to reflect market prices, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2024 

Mr. FEENSTRA (for himself and Ms. CRAIG) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to provide regular 

updates to Livestock Indemnity Program payment rates 

to reflect market prices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Livestock Indemnity 

5 Program Improvement Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIVESTOCK INDEMNITY PAYMENTS. 

7 Section 1501(b)(2) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 

8 (7 U.S.C. 9081(b)(2)) is amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8431 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and 

2 (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively, and indent3 ing appropriately; 

4 (2) in the matter preceding clause (i) (as so 

5 designated), by striking ‘‘Indemnity’’ and inserting 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Indemnity’’; and 

8 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(B) DETERMINATION OF MARKET

10 VALUE.—The Secretary shall determine the 

11 market value described in subparagraph (A)— 

12 ‘‘(i) in coordination with the Adminis13 trator of the Agricultural Marketing Serv14 ice; 

15 ‘‘(ii) using other appropriate re16 sources, as determined by the Secretary; 

17 and 

18 ‘‘(iii) on a quarterly basis.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Docket Number: FAA-2015-0684

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

TCCA Yosha Mendis 10/9/14 No Objection
No. 58114.

protests 154388-K, etc. (Duluth).

#### F. E. Macartney *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the Western white spruce lumber the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(31 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1538), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Summary of EPA Meeting with C12 Energy

May 10, 2012

On Thursday, May 10, 2012, representatives of EPA met with Mr. Barclay Rogers of C12 

Energy to discuss the status of the August 8, 2011 proposed rule. Topics included the nature of 

C12 Energy's business and interest in the proposed regulation, the comments that C12 Energy

had submitted to EPA in response to the proposed rule, and the status of the pending final rule. 

Mr. Rogers did not submit any written materials at this meeting.

Attendees:

Ross Elliott, EPA/ORCR

Melissa Kaps, EPA/ORCR

Bruce Kobelski, EPA/ OGWDW 

Barclay Rogers, C12 Energy
imci_ex1037.htm


EXHIBIT 10.37












MODIFICATION AGREEMENT TO



PROMISSORY NOTES









This MODIFICATION AGREEMENT is made as of December 31, 2014 between Infinite Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation with offices at 80 Office Park Way, Pittsford, NY 14534 (“Borrower”) and Carle C. Conway, an individual residing at 1305 E. via Entrada, Tucson, AZ  85718 (“Lender”).







WHEREAS, Lender is the holder of three (3) Promissory Notes issued by the Borrower to the Lender, as described in more detail in the attached Schedule A (collectively, the Notes); and







WHEREAS, the parties desire to modify the terms and conditions of the Promissory Notes as follows:







NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:








	
1)  

	
The Notes and each of them are modified to provide that the time at which the entire principal balance and accrued and unpaid interest shall be due and payable is January 1, 2018.













	
2)  

	
The rate of interest shall be ten percent (10%) per annum;













	
3)  

	
Except as modified by this Agreement, all of the terms, covenants and conditions of the Notes shall remain the same.












In witness whereof, Borrower and Lender have executed this Agreement under the day and year first written above.







INFINITE GROUP, INC.












       /s/ James Villa              


By: James Villa, President


 







       /s/ Carle C. Conway    


By: Carle C. Conway


 




  





  











  






 


PROMISSORY NOTES OF INFINITE GROUP, INC.


IN FAVOR OF CARLE C. CONWAY


 








	Holder 	Principal Amount 	Date
	 	 	 
	
Carle C. Conway

	
$150,000

	
8/13/03


	
Carle C. Conway

	
$  50,000

	
1/16/04


	
Carle C. Conway

	
$  65,000

	
3/11/04
No. 53081.

#### D. Ashear & Bros. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 118554-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D.239), the protests were dismissed.
#### In the Matter of the Superintendent of the Insurance Department *v.*The North America Life Insurance Company.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by Learned, P. J.; Westbrook, J., not acting.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Cunningham, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 472]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), rendered October 5, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree (two counts), and prohibited use of weapons, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of the branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Although technically the Judge who issued the search warrant in this case failed to comply with CPL article 690, we conclude that reversal is not required since the Judge substantially complied with the requirements of that article *(see,*CPL 690.35, 690.36, 690.40; *People v Taylor,*73 NY2d 683; *People v Camarre,*171 AD2d 1003). Further, to the extent the defendant argues that the conditions that the Judge placed on the execution of the search warrant rendered it invalid, that contention is not preserved for appellate review and, in any event, it is without merit *(see, People v Vasquez,*66 NY2d 968, *cert denied*475 US 1109; *People v Martin,*50 NY2d 1029; *People v Maxwell,*159 Mise 2d 28).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
April 19, 1945

No. 50140.

Suit 4483.

#### Corporacion *Argentina de Productores de Carnes*v. *United States.*

C. D. 840 reversed March 5, 1945. C. A. D. 304.
No. 64220.

protests 59/25115, etc. (New York).

#### D. H. Grant & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 46220.

#### Protest 48515-K of Mme. Beatrice Lever (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise was held not subject to the assessment of countervailing duties. The protest was therefore sustained to that extent.
1 THEHONORABLE THOMAS C. MUMMERT, III, United States Magistrate

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-3364

___________ Robert E. Dancler, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Board of Municipal Utilities, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant - Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 28, 2000 Filed: November 30, 2000

___________ Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Robert Dancler appeals the district court’s 1 judgment dismissing his employment discrimination action after a jury verdict in favor of defendant Board of Municipal Utilities. Having carefully reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, as we must, see, e.g. , Langlie v. Onan Corp. , 192 F.3d 1137, 1139-40-2-

(8th Cir. 1999, cert. denied , 120 S. Ct. 1719 (2000), we cannot say that no reasonable juror could have returned that verdict. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Currency Series.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                    
|Robert J. Enck                                                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC,
|the Managing Owner of Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund  
|                                                                      
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                       
|Brent Bales                                                           
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC,              
|the Managing Owner of Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund  
|                                                                      
|Date: May 10, 2007
No. 47439.

#### Protests 39021-K/89537, etc., of Oscar Leistner, Inc. (Chicago).

*391Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Minami*(29 C. C. P. A. 169, C. A. D. 188) the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 353 was sustained.