alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex4-2.htm


Exhibit 4.2

 

Notice on requests for non-material agreements

 

 

Instruments with respect to long-term debt of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K since the total amount authorized under each such omitted instrument does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, BRIAN FISHER, certify,  pursuant to Rule 13a-4 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
with respect to the Annual Report of 1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.  (formerly  Pultronex
Corporation) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31, 2005 ("Report") that:

(1) I have reviewed this Report;

(2) based on my knowledge,  this Report does not contain any untrue statement of
a  material  fact  or omit  to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

(3)  based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements  and  other  financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of 1-900 Jackpot, Inc.
(formerly  Pultronex  Corporation) as of, and for the periods  presented in this
Report;

(4) I am responsible for  establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and  15d-14)  for 1-900
Jackpot,  Inc.  (formerly  Pultronex  Corporation) and I have: (a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material  information relating
to 1-900 Jackpot,  Inc. (formerly Pultronex  Corporation) is made known to me by
others,  particularly  during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
(b) evaluated the  effectiveness  of 1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.  (formerly  Pultronex
Corporation)'s  disclosure  controls and  procedures as of a date within 90 days
prior  to the  filing  date of this  Report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and (c)
presented  in  this  Report  my  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of  the
disclosure  controls and procedures  based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

(5) I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation,  to our auditors and
the audit  committee  of our  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent  function):  (a)  all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or
operation  of  internal  controls  which could  adversely  affect our ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for our
auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and (b) any fraud,
whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in our internal controls; and





DATE:   NOVEMBER 22, 2005

BY:      /S/ BRIAN FISHER
      ---------------------------
             BRIAN FISHER
    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Exhibit 32.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Long/Short Commodity Series.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                     
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund



|                                                                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                          
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                              
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Long/Short Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund

Date: November 26, 2008
#### WILLIAM v. EHRENS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD MARGOLIN, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

May 25, 1964. Denied.

*Messrs. Lloyd, Horn, Megargee & Steedle*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Milton B. Mermelstein, Mr. Jerome Stein*and *Mr. Arnold L. Burns*for the respondents.

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICOLAS TRUJILLO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2368 MCE GGH P

vs.

D. LORUSSO,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On August 5, 2005, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel

because he failed to serve defendants with his motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. On August 11, 2005,

plaintiff filed a letter with the court stating that he did serve defendants with his motion. 

Attached to plaintiff’s August 11, 2005, pleading is a proof of service of the motion on

defendants’ counsel.

Plaintiff did not attach the proof of service on defendants’ counsel to his motion

as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Plaintiff is informed that every pleading he files with the court

must include proof of service on opposing counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 9/20/05 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

tru2368.ord UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02368-MCE -GGH Document 32 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 1
March 31, 2015


 


CONSENT
OF PINNACLE ENERGY SERVICES, L.L.C.


 


We consent to
the references to our firm in the form and context in which they appear in the Form 10-K Annual Report of Osage Exploration and
Development, Inc. (the “Annual Report”). We hereby further consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of estimates
of oil and gas reserves contained in our report entitled:


 


Osage
Exploration & Development, Inc.


Reserves
and Economic Evaluation Year End 2014


Effective:
January 1, 2015


SEC Pricing


 


and to the
inclusion of our report dated March 9, 2015 as an exhibit to the Annual Report.


 


PINNACLE
ENERGY SERVICES, LLC.


 


	/s/ Richard J. Morrow. P.E.	 
	Richard J. Morrow, P.E.	 
	Oklahoma City, Oklahoma	 
	March 31, 2015	 



 

	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ J.P. Dick, P.E.
	 	J.P. Dick, P.E.
	 	 
	 	PINNACLE ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
	 	TBPE Firm License No. F6204
Septemb e r 23, 2015 Document Proces s ing Ce nter Off ice of Pe s ticide Programs (7504 P ) U.S. Envi ron mental Protection Agency Room 54900, One Potomac Yard 2777 S. Crystal Driv e Arlington, Vi r gi nia 22202 --15 01 Atte nti on: Mr. R e uben Bari s Team Leader 25 

# MONSANTO
**~**

Subject: MON 78746 H erbic id e, E PA Reg. No. 524 -523; R eq u es t to Vo lunta ri ly Ca n ce l Reg i s t rat ion Dea r Mr. B<1ris: MONSANTO COMPANY 800 N
. LINDBERCH B l VD
. Sr LOUIS , MI SSOUR I 6)1 6 7 h llp :/ / www .monsan t o.com

MO 787-16 Herbic id e, EPA Re g. No. 52-1-523, is a p<1ck<1ged mi x of th e i sop ropyla min e s<1 lt of g lyp h osa te <1nd qui zalofo p P-ethyl that was g ranted co nditiona l re g is trati o n b y th e Agency o n Augus t 28, 2000. Monsanto h as nev e r co mmerciali ze d thi s prod u c t <1nd h as instead focused o n providing newer t oo l s to help farmers sust<1inably produce e n o u gh food for a growing wo rld. Th e refore, in ilcco rd.m ce with th e provisions se t forth at riFRA 6(f)(1) reg ardin g Voluntary C ancell a ti o n, Mon sa nto requ es ts that th e rc g 1 s tmti o n of MON 78746 Herbi c ide, EPA Re g . No. 524 -5 23 be canceled. Importantly, Monsanto stand s by th e sa fet y all o ur products, in cl udin g MO 787- 1 6 Herbicide, EPA Reg. t o. 52-l-523
. Thb ca n cell il ti o n requ es t is a bu s in ess decision based on o ur c urrent co mmerc ia l plans and assess ment of the marke tp l ace. Beca u se thi s p rod u ct was never co mmerc ia li zed, regi s tered for u se in any St.1tc in anticipation of il release for s hipment, or registered f o r any min o r agricultural u se, th e re is n o reaso n t o believe th at cance llati on would a d ve rsely nffec t min or c rop g rowe r s o r po se a n unrea so n able adverse effec t o n the enviro nmen t. Therefore, acco rdin g to F IF RA 6(f)(C)(ii) , M o n sa nto requ es ts that the Agency W<li\· e th e 1 80-d<l)' comment peri od nnd rely o n a 30 -day period followi n g publication of n n otice of receipt 

### o f this reque s t in the Federal

**el!i~lcr** fo r th e public to co mment. Also, b eca u se thi s product was n eve r rel eased into th e c h<1nn e l s of

**trade ,~-~­**  provision to ndd r ess e xi s ting s to ck is n ecess<1ry. Ii yo u should have <1ny questions rc gM din g this reque s t, p lease contact Dr
. James 1 yangulu <1!

**(202~** 383- 2866, or me directly at (314) 69-1-9035, o r by e lec troni c mnil nt s tep h e n. a.adnm s&• • monsanto.com. S inc e rel y,

Regulatory Affairs Mm1ager

cc: Khue Ng u yen 

### I Er; \ Pesticide R e-eva luation Div ision Dr. ]:1me s 1\:yangulu 

### I Monsanto D.C. Offi ce
#### **EXHIBIT 10.22**

#### ** **

##### **NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS COMPENSATION TERM SHEET**

##### ** **

Non-employeedirectors of Websense, Inc. receive the following fees for each meeting of theBoard of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors attended by eachdirector:

 
| **Meeting**                                   | ** ** | **In Person Attendance** | ** ** | **Telephonic Meeting** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------|------------|------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                    | ** ** | ** **               | ** ** | ** **             | ** ** |
| Board of  Directors                           |       | $                        | 3,000      |                   | $          | 1,000 |   |
| Audit  Committee (non-chairman)               |       | 1,500                    |       | 1,000                  |       |
| Audit  Committee Chairman                     |       | 3,500                    |       | 2,000                  |       |
| Compensation  Committee (non-chairman)        |       | 1,000                    |       | 500                    |       |
| Compensation  Committee Chairman              |       | 2,000                    |       | 1,000                  |       |
| Nominating  and Governance Committee Chairman |       | 1,000                    |       | 500                    |       |
| Special  project ad hoc committees            |       | 500                      |       | —                 |       |
|                                               |            |                          |            |                        |            |  |  |

 

Meetingfees are paid quarterly in arrears. Websense does not pay directors an annual retainer.  Websense reimburses non-employee directorsfor their reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board ofDirectors and committees.

 

**Under the Automatic OptionGrant Program in effect under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, each individualwho first joins the Board of Directors as a non-employee director anytime afterMarch 28, 2000 will receive, on the date of such initial election orappointment, an automatic option grant to purchase 50,000 shares of our commonstock, provided that such person has not previously been one of ouremployees.  In addition, on the date ofeach Annual Stockholders meeting held after March 28, 2000, eachindividual who continues to serve as a non-employee director will automaticallybe granted an option to purchase 2,500 shares of our common stock, providedsuch individual has served as a non-employee director for at least six monthsprior to such meeting.**

** **

**Websense reserves theright to change these terms and/or this Term Sheet from time to time as itfeels necessary to accomplish its goals.**

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROSA LERMA,

Appellant,

v.

GERARDO QUINTANA,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00270

- CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2012

- CCV03594)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rosa Lerma, Appellant, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to

T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)(2) because the parties have settled the dispute. We grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. The motion does not reflect that the parties have made any agre ement

regarding costs. Accordingly, costs are taxed against Appellant. See T EX .R.A PP .P.

42.1(d)(absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant).

August 14, 2013

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, *v.*NATHANIEL CUTLER, Jr., Appellant.

*Disorderly p&rsons and, gamesters*— who *a/re*— *Codie of Criminal Procedure, see.*899.

The defendant kept a public saloon, to which persóns resorted for the purpose of playing pool and bagatelle. In some cases the losers were, by the terms of the game, to pay for the use of the apparatus, and in others for the drinks:

*Meld,,*that the house was a public nuisance at common law, and that persons who resorted to it were gamesters within the meaning of subdivisions *4*and 7 of section 899 of the Oode of Civil Procedure.-

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Sessions of Westchester county, affirming a judgment of a Court of Special Sessions adjudging the defendant to be a disorderly person and requiring him to enter into a bond, with sureties, for $250.

*A. J.*Adams, for the appellant.

*Nelson H. Baiter,*district-attorney, for the people.

Gilbert, J.:

With respect to the technical objections to the judgment appealed from, it will be sufficient to refer to section 764 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Upon the merits we think the evidence is suf*466ficient to sustain the conviction. The statute (Code Grim. Proc., § 899, subd. 4 and T) defines disorderly persons; and among the persons so defined, are keepers of houses for the resort of gamesters, and persons who keep in a public place an apparatus or device for the purpose of gaming. The evidence shows that the defendant kept a public saloon, to which persons resorted for the purpose of playing a game called pool, and another game called bagatelle.

These games were sometimes played upon the terms that the loser of the game should pay for the use of the gaming apparatus; but at other times the players played for drinks. The house of the defendant, as appears, was kept principally for those purposes. Such a house is a public nuisance at common law *(Tanner*v. *The Trustees of*Albion, 5 Hill, 121), and persons who resort there are gamesters within the definition of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

In *Hitchins*v. *The People*(39 N. Y., 456), the Court-of Appeals held that playing games for beer or cigars, was gambling within the meaning of chapter 504 of the Laws of 1851, which prohibited the keeping of a room, etc., to be used for gambling.

That case is in accordance with general principles for the promotion of the public welfare, and is decisive of this case.

The conviction must be affirmed.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Dykman JJ.

Conviction and judgment.affirmed.
#### In the Matter of RICHARD R. S. CARROLL, an attorney-at-law.

May 4, 1964.

Name of respondent stricken from roll of attorneys at law. Opinion reported at 42 *N. J.*248.
Case No. 6,781.

#### HOWELL et al. v. PHILADELPHIA MUT. INS. CO.

[25 Hunt Mer. Mag. 80.]

Circuit Court, D. Maryland.

July, 1851.

Marine Insurance — Sale by Master as under Necessity — Abandonment, When Justified.

[1. A salé by the master as under necessity cannot bind the underwriters, unless the circumstances antecedent to the sale are such as to authorize an abandonment.]

[2. There is no right to abandon under policies which fix the value of the ship, when the estimates of repairs do not exceed one-half of such valuation.)

[This was an action by Howell & Lemmon against the Philadelphia Mutual Insurance Company.]

Messrs. Glenn and Talbot, for plaintiffs.

Charles F. Mayer, for defendants.

' Before TANEY. Circuit Justice, and ; HEATH, District Judge.

In this case, among other points, the defendants contended that there can be no sale, as under necessity, by the master, which can bind the underwriters where the circumstances antecedent to the sale do not authorize an abandonment; and that there was no right, in these cases before the court, to abandon, as the estimate of necessary repairs did not exceed half of the amount at which the ship was valued in the policies; these containing a clause that fixes the policy valuation as the only standard, in any case of loss, constructive or actual. THE COURT decided all these positions for the defendants, and recognized- the policy valuation as the only and binding value under the .special clause referred to for claims of loss. The authority to sell from necessity as given to the master by various decisions, so as to implicate insurers in a total loss with salvage, has rested on very vague grounds hitherto. But this decision of establishing that as to insurers it is only the right to abandon that makes the necessity, justice, gives definiteness to the principle of “necessary" sales in, at least, a very large class of cases of loss.
# ENERGY CONSERVATION ST AN DARDS PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS: TEST PROCEDURES FOR FLUORESCENT AND INCANDESCENT LAMPS

NAME TITLE ADDRESS

TELEPHONE 

# PUBLIC MEETING MARCH 5, 1996

FAX NO.


# ENERGY CONSERVATION ST ANDARDS PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS: TEST PROCEDURES FOR FLUORESCENT AND IN C AN DESCENT LAMPS PUBLIC MEETING MARCH 5, 1996 NAME TITLE ADDRESS

TELEPHONE j,,: -' - L> `I `1 `/ y, t FAX NO. -6 Y `e - Y J# ENERGY CONSERVATION ST ANDARDS PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS: TEST PROCEDURES FOR FLUORESCENT AND IN CANDESCENT LAMPS PUBLIC MEETING MARCH 5, 1996 NAME TITLE ADDRESS

### American Council for an

Energy-Efficient Economy 

## St -__ - "a . Deputy Director 1001 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington. DC 20036

ELE 

# _H

PRODUCTS DIVISIONS OF (202) 429-8873 Fax (202) 429-2248 E-mail: Steven_Nadel@ccmail.pnl.gov

DIC TOOL INCANDESCENT LAMPS SELF BALLASTED MERCURY VAPOR LAMPS FLUORESCENT LAMPS QUARTZ HALOGEN LAMPSSAF-T-COTE SHATTERPROOF LAMPS NE 114 POPLAR STREET < i " LE. PA 16335 • 8141336-4468

OUTSIDE PA Cf _L TOLL FREE 800-441-7796

a Drve ^t -'004 ' Commercial Engineer 201-808-1800. Ext. 5870 Fax: 201-808-6633 David A . Krailo Product Marketing Mana er g Linear Fluorescent Lamps 0-7 D- _ Ts Fe

Peter A. Bleasby Director Industry Relations & Standards ' IIA INC. eat 923 750-2441 -_432

Development '^-IA INC. Street 01923 (508) 750-2354 0-2080
No. 58601.

protests 165540-K, etc. (New York).

#### RCA Victor Div. Radio Corp. of America et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper coverings containing phonograph records the subject of *United States*v. *Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division*(41 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 541), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

DRAFT 

CITY OF LEBANON 

CITY COUNCIL 

Minutes, Regular Session, July 16,2014 

City Hall-Council Chambers 

7:00p.m. 

MEMBERS PRESENT: 

MEMBERS ABSENT: 

STAFF PRESENT: 

Mayor Georgia Tuttle, Councilors Bruce Bronner, Carol 

Dustin, Erling Heistad, Karen Liot Hill, Heather Collier 

Vogel, Stephen Wood 

Assistant Mayor Suzanne Prentiss, Councilor Nicole 

Corm en 

City Manager Greg Lewis, City Clerk Sandra Allard, Fire 

Chief Chris Christopoulos, Public Works Director Michael 

Lavalla, City Engineer Christina Hall, Airport Manager 

Rick Dyment 

The meeting was called to order at 7:03p.m. by Mayor Tuttle. 

I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 

Councilor Hill led the Council in the Pledge. 

IX. NEW BUSINESS 

C. Discussion and Recommendation to the United States Department of 

Transportation: Essential Air Service-Cape Air 

(Councilor Hill returned to the Council at this time.) 

Andrew Bonney and Jacqueline Donohoo of Cape Air appeared. Mr. Bonney said Cape 

Air has held the Essential Air Service contract at Lebanon Airport for the past six years. 

He said the Council took a risk by approving them the first time. The Airport went under 

10,000 enplanements. Cape Air was invited to increase enplanements to above the 10,000 

level. He said there is no local financial match required for this. He said USDOT is 

interested in local input. He said because of community demand, service to New York 

was added, and that service has worked well. He said in 2012 and 2013, the Airport 

exceeded 10,000 enplanements. He said advance reservations are up 25% for the Boston 

route and 13% for the New York route over last year. He said Cape Air would like a new 

four-year contract. 
Lebanon City Council, Minutes, July 16,2014 Page 2 of2 

1 Ms. Donohoo said Cape Air has focused on integrating the airline into the community. 

2 They have done advertising and have donated over $60,000 to local organizations in 

3 tickets and cash. 

4 

5 Karen Liot Hill moved that the Lebanon City Council hereby recommends to the 

6 United States Department of Transportation that Hyannis Air Service, Inc. d/b/a 

7 Cape Air be selected to provide Essential Air Service to the Lebanon Airport for a 

8 four-year term beginning December 1, 2014. 

9 

10 She further moved that the Lebanon City Council understands that Cape Air 

11 operates its service utilizing 9-seat Cessna 402 aircraft and hereby waives its right to 

12 receive Essential Air Service with 15-seat or larger aircraft. 

13 

14 Seconded by Stephen Wood. 

15 

16 Councilor Hill said the City did take a risk, but the service has gone well and has added 

17 value to the community. Councilor Bronner said the service to New York is great. Mayor 

18 Tuttle asked if Cape Air is looking into the ability to change terminals without going 

19 through security again. Mr. Bonney said a connecting walkway between terminals is 

20 planned. 

21 

22 *The motion passed 7-0.