alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 471 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8292 

[Report No. 118–570] 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase penalties for 

unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Mr. SMITH of Missouri (for himself, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. 

WENSTRUP, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. ESTES, Mr. 

SMUCKER, Mr. HERN, Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. 

KUSTOFF, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. STEUBE, Ms. TENNEY, Mrs. 

FISCHBACH, Mr. MOORE of Utah, Mrs. STEEL, Ms. VAN DUYNE, Mr. 

FEENSTRA, Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, and Mr. CAREY) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

JUNE 28, 2024 

Additional sponsor: Mr. MORAN

JUNE 28, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 8, 2024] 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8292 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

penalties for unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8292 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Data Protec5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED DIS7 CLOSURES OF TAXPAYER INFORMATION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and 

9 (5) of section 7213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

10 are each amended by striking ‘‘$5,000, or imprisonment of 

11 not more than 5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘$250,000, or impris12 onment of not more than 10 years’’. 

13 (b) DISCLOSURES OF RETURN INFORMATION OF MUL14 TIPLE TAXPAYERS TREATED AS MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS.— 

15 Section 7213(a) of such Code is amended by adding at the 

16 end the following new paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(6) DISCLOSURES OF RETURN INFORMATION OF

18 MULTIPLE TAXPAYERS TREATED AS MULTIPLE VIOLA19 TIONS.—For purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), 

20 and (5), a separate violation occurs with respect to 

21 each taxpayer whose return or return information is 

22 disclosed in violation of any such paragraph.’’. 

23 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this 

24 section shall apply to disclosures made after the date of the 

25 enactment of this Act. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 471 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8292 

[Report No. 118–570] 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

taxpayer information. increase penalties for unauthorized disclosure of 

JUNE 28, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 63166.

#### Schenley Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 25142-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved *411in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61891.

#### F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 306830-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the three champagne tanks in question consist of cylindrical tanks for holding liquids, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 7300.

Invoices dated Nottingham, England, August 1945, etc.

Certified August 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 19, 1945.

Entry No. 717001, etc.

*193(Decided June 19, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley 8. King*of counsel) for tlie plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve the same issues as were involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Upon the facts and the law I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importers on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 47939.

#### Protests 946219-G, etc., of Boston Brokerage Co. et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Abstract 47184 the claim at 5 cents per pound under paragraph 48 was sustained as to certain of the merchandise.
Marlin Business Services Corp.
Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Independent Directors
  
    
    A one-time initial option grant of 5,000 shares will
be made to each Non-Employee Independent Director
upon such Directors first-time election/appointment
to the Companys Board of Directors.1
    
    Each Non-Employee Independent Director will
receive the following annual compensation for
their Board and Committee memberships:
 
    
    Annual retainer2  $100,000 for Chairman of the Board and $30,000 for each other Non-Employee Independent Director
    
    Restricted stock grant yielding a present value of $41,000 for Chairman of the Board and $36,000 for each other Non-Employee
Independent Director3
 
    
    The Committee Chairmen will also be paid the following amounts each year 4:
 
    
    Audit Committee Chairman
    
    $
    10,000
    
    Compensation Committee Chairman
    
    $
    4,000
    
    Nominating/Governance Committee Chairman
    
    $
    2,000
 
    
    Non-Employee Independent Director ownership requirement:
 
    
    Each Non-Employee Independent Director shall be required to own 2,500
shares of Company stock (or 7,500 shares if serving as Chairman of the
Board). Restricted shares do not count toward the ownership
requirement.
 
 1
    
    These options will have a seven year term and will vest pro-rata over four
years from the grant date (one-quarter of the total grant per year).2
    
    This retainer shall be paid in quarterly installments.3
    
    Restricted stock grants will vest at the earlier of (a) seven years from the
grant gate and (b) six months following the Non-Employee Independent Directors termination of
Board service.4
    
    These fees shall be paid in quarterly installments
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) BARBARAJEAN KONE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil ActionNo. 11-0054 (RJL) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

ORDER Forthe reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant District ofColumbia Public Schools' motion to dismiss [Dkt. #10] is GRANTED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint andthis civil action are DISMISSED. This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). SO ORDERED.

## DA;~~

# ~/ 

# 31> 

# I" 

# (ZA

# RIJHA~ United States District Judge
11/17/201 1 10:3 5 FA X 20249351^ 2 FA A^ OH S 0001/00 2 

# N I T E D ^

ii-;A!MSP0RW10 N • • • O& B OFERATiOM S Jonatha n T.Lind e ZOi ! NO V H Ail ^

i I Managin g Direcior . Ssnio rCounse l Regulator y Jonathan.Linde9unilod.CQ m VI A FEDERA LEXPRES S Hearin g Docke t Federa l Aviatio n Adminisiratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue . S W Washingion , D C 2059 1 Atienlion ; Hearin g Docke r Cler k AG O 43 0 Wllbu i Wrigh t

Buildin g Roo m201 4 Re : KAACascNo . 2010SW27015 7 I ' hK - '^Oll - {

^ 1 ^ ^ ^ I' O ih c Hearin g Docke t

Clerk ; Pursuan t l o 1 4 CF R13.215 . Continenta l Airlines; . Inc . ("Continental" ) hereb y withdraw s it s reques t io i ahearinf ; i n rh c aJ>ove-jeference dcase . Settlemen t ha s bee n re.iche dwit h th e hedera l Aviati»:t n Adniinistraiio n ("FA A " ) o n a n orde r ih;ii Coniinciiia l ha s agree dno t t o appeal , an dth e F A Awil l no t

fil e acomplain t

agains- t Coniincnta l i

n ihi i matter . Thi. s settlemen l doe.* ; no t con.'^ijtui e o r

impl y iidinisLsio

n b y Continenta l tha i i

f committe dth e violciiiou s allege db y th e h'A A i n ihiii ea.'^

c oi- agree s withth e fact s allege db y th e FAA . Daicd : Novembe r

7 . 201 1 Respectfull y submitted .

IJNITF D AI RLINES . LVC . Jonatha n T . Linde Managin g Direcior , Senio r Counse l Regulatoi"y ' Regulatory , Alliance s an dInternationa l Unite dAi r

Lines . Inc . 7 7 Wes t VVacke r Drive , 16" ' Floo r

HDQL D Cliicaeo , Illinoi s 6()60 l '17F : G12 ) 997- 8 4 1 E-niiUl. " jondlhrtn.limJctSuniied.co m Ccnificat e o f

Servic e attaehe d Cop y to : Ti mDuff . Estj . Federa l .Aviatio n Administratio n (Office o f Regiona l Counsel . Soiithwes l Rei^io n 260 1 Meacha mBoulc'viird For t VVonh . Ti.Aa.'

i 7619:^-(>iK)7 Vi aFedera l Expres s an dFacsimil e (8J7 ) 222-5945/509 2

Thf l UnrtA

d Building—hDQL

A7 7 Westv;aci<(? i Drive , Chicago . IL6060 1 ASTA R ALLlArJG E M^WR^ R 'T ^11/17/201 1 10.3 5 FA X 2024935M 2 FA.^ ^ - QM S ©002/00 2



### CERTIFICATE O FSERVICE 1 hereb y certif

y thai the attache ddocumen t w;i' ^ delivere dovernigh

t b y Federa l Exprcs. s andsent b y facsimil e t

o the following attorney o f recor dfo r the Federa

l Aviarion Admmistraiio n o n Novembe r 7 . 20 1 I : 7i m f)uff , E,sq . 

### Federa l .Aviatio n .Adminisn-atio

n Offic e o f Regiona l Counsel . Southwes t

Regio n 260 1 Meacha

mBoulevar

d Eo n Wonh , Texa s 76193-000 7 Vi aFedera

l E\pre.v= : ^n

dFacsimil e (SI7 ) 222-5945/509 2 Dated : Novembe

r 7 . 201 1

Jonatha n T . Linde

Th p IinrTft d Buiidinq—HtJQLA , 7 7 Wes t vtfacke rDrive . Chicago . IL6060 1
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

The State ofConnecticut and

Devon Power, LLC

)

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement and Order No. 825 I

Modification No.3

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Devon Power, LLC

("Respondent") having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order

No. 825 I and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual agreement, further modify said

modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

I. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-I 74-22(d)(I) through 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies ("Regulations") are

hereby replaced with May I, 2010.

2. Any references to October Ist with respect to the date by which the Respondent shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits ("DERCs") and/or

allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009.

3. Any references to May 3 I, 2007 and May 3I, 2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 3I, 2009 and May 3I,

2010.

4. All references to September I, 2008 with respect to the submission of Future

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009.

5. No later than May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 825 I and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent

shall comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-I 74-22(d)(I) and 22a-I74-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations.

6. All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 825 I, as modified,

shall remain in effect.

( Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street • Hartford. CT 06106 - 5127

http://www.ct.govldcp

All Equal Opportullity Employer
Devon Power, LLC 2 Trading Agreement and

Order No. 8251

Modification No.3

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

Devon Power, LLC

Name: ------""----"---------''------------''--

Signature: --+2~.~·_>'_y,;;$"":......:c _

t~f>L 1:[

Date:-----------'-----

Title: -'-f_L-_Jlr.J __-r__fY'_/1)...J_· _t1_.~_~__

/...!-13-~ol

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order.

GarkJRost}

Director

Engineering and Enforcement Division

Bureau of Air Management

Date
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Summit Financial Services Group, Inc. (the
Company), for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marshall T. Leeds, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Marshall T. Leeds                                       
|Marshall T. Leeds                                           
|Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President

Dated: August 14, 2006
January 3, 2003

Private and Confidential

Mr. Victor Cardenas
365 Southborough Drive
West Vancouver, B.C. V7S 1L9

Dear Mr. Cardenas,

Pursuant to Sun Power's recent assignment from Securities Trading Services Inc. of the option to acquire the La Verde Silver Mine (the "Property") we are pleased to confirm the following basic terms of your employment effective upon Sun Power's acquisition of the Property:

1. Sun Power will immediately upon closing of the acquisition of the Property, cause its proposed operating Mexican subsidiary ("NEW-MEX") to enter into a consultancy agreement whereby you shall serve as the President of NEW MEX for a minimum period of 5 years with the following compensation:
2. a base salary of $12,000 per month subject to annual review by the CFO of Sun Power;
3. an annual cash bonus equal to a % of the net after tax earnings derived from the commercial operations of the Property; such % to be determined by the CFO of Sun Power and approved by the compensation committee of Sun Power;
4. all reasonable and acceptable expenses as incurred by you in your day to day activities as President of NEW-MEX. This shall include all costs associated with relocation and transportation.
5. a stock option program as set by the Sun Power compensation committee;
6. a benefits package including health, dental and disability coverage etc;

Upon your acceptance of the above terms, we will prepare a standard employment contract which will also include a definition of duties, termination, confidentiality and other standard terms and conditions in a contract of this nature.

Sincerely,/s/ Andrew Schwab
Andrew Schwab
President
#### Gertrude M. Feller, and another, *administrators, etc., Respondents, v.*Andrew L. Martin, *Appellant.*

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Dykman, J.; BabNAbd, P. J., not sitting.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 21, 2019

NO. 03-18-00562-CR

Joshua Vardell, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt entered by the trial court. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s

judgment adjudicating guilt. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Year-end Report of eAcceleration Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I , E.
Edward Ahrens, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

             (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

             (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


                                                /s/ E. Edward Ahrens
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                               E. Edward Ahrens
                                               Chief Financial Officer

                                         Dated: April 10, 2003
**EXHIBIT
      23**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 No. 333-138396) pertaining to the NDS 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the
      NDS
      UK Approved Share Option Scheme and the NDS Group plc Sharesave Scheme of our
      reports dated August 29, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial
      statements of NDS Group plc and the effectiveness of internal control over
      financial reporting of NDS Group plc, included in the
      Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2007.






Ernst
                & Young LLP




London,
                EnglandAugust
                29, 2007
No. 41831.

#### Protest 210817-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the Normandy laces in question are similar to those the subject of *Amrein v. United States*(T. D. 49551). In accordance therewith the claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was sustained.
#### Ebenezer Gordon, *Respondent, v.*The Scovill Manufacturing Company, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event; Opinion by Daniels, J., and by Davis, P. ■ J., dissenting
#### Diane Chambers, Appellant, v 15 Beach Owners, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[633 NYS2d 1016]

—In an action for a declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and to recover damages due to the defendants’ refusal to approve a sublease of the plaintiff’s cooperative apartment, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated April 7, 1994, which, *inter alia,*granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff had breached her proprietary lease and that approval of the subtenancy was properly denied, and determining that the defendants were entitled to an award of reasonable attorney’s fees.

*401Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Upon our review of the record, we find that the Supreme Court properly concluded that no question of fact exists with respect to the defendants’ refusal to approve the plaintiff’s sublease of her cooperative apartment *(see, Matter of Levandusky v One Fifth Ave. Apt. Corp.,*75 NY2d 530, 540; *Joint Queensview Hous. Enter, v Balogh,*174 AD2d 605). Furthermore, under the terms of the proprietary lease, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendants are entitled to an award of reasonable attorney’s fees. Ritter, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF FLORENCE KOROL, A/K/A FLORA KOROL, A/K/A FLORENCE SHADES, DECEASED.

*Mr. Bichard J. Tarrant*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Jesse Moskowitz*for the respondent.

May 28, 1968.

Denied.
#### Rensselaer Riley and others, *Appellants,*v. John C. Hulbert, *Respondent.*

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Boardman, J.;

Bockes, J., takes no part.
ex10-38.htm


 

Exhibit 10.38

 

AMENDMENT TO THE
BPZ RESOURCES, INC.
2007 DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION INCENTIVE PLAN

 

WHEREAS, BPZ Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted and maintains the BPZ Energy, Inc. 2007 Directors’ Compensation Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of June 4, 2007, to provide an opportunity for its Directors to earn long term incentive awards in consideration for their services;

 

WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to reserve additional shares for issuance under the Plan.

 

NOW THEREFORE, effective as of June 20, 2014, the Plan is hereby amended by replacing Section 6(a) with the following new Section 6(a) that shall read as follows:

 

“(a)  Maximum Shares.  Subject to adjustment as provided in this Section 6, there is hereby reserved for issuance under the Plan up to 4,000,000 shares of Stock of the Company.”

 

 

*     *     *

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BPZ Resources, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representatives on this 20th day of June, 2014.

 

 


	
 

 

 

By:    /s/ Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker                                

          Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker
          President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 
	
 

 

 

By:    /s/ Richard Menniti                                      
          Richard Menniti
          Chief Financial Officer
#### Simeon Smith, *as Executor, etc., Respondent, v.*Elizabeth Breakey, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Westbrook, J.
No. 51783.

#### Protests 806914-G, etc., of Wines & Spirits (Hawaii), Ltd., et al. (Honolulu, etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 60871.

#### Keuffel & Esser Co. *v.*United States,

protests 294534r-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of boxes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59557, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### JOHN T. LIVINGSTON, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. MANUS J. O’DONNELL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

May 25, 1964. Denied.

See same case below: 83 *N. J. Super.*98.

*Mr. Joseph N. Dempsey*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Joseph F. Mattice, Mr. Thomas E. Durkin, Jr.*and *Mr. William J. Oearty*for the respondent.

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.