June 27, 2009

() Ms. Randy Hamilton

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Office ofPennitting and Registration, Air Pennits Division (MCI63)

12100 Park 35 Circle

Austin, TX 78753 AIRPERMHSDIV/SION

VIA FedEx

TRK# 797717837453 JUN 2 92009

~til1~,~; REGEU/ED '!~

RE: PM, VOC, HCL, CL2, METALS (INCLUDING MECURy), AND

DIOXINIFURAN PERFORMANCE TESTING

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, L.P., BALCONES CEMENT PLANT

Pennit No. 6048IPSD-TX-74Ml, TCEQ ACCOUNT NO. CS-0022-K

Dear Mr. Hamilton+

Attached is the completed perfonnance testing for PM, VOCs, HCL, CL2, Metals and

Dioxin/Furan (DF). The testing for the PM and DF is required by 40 CFR Part 63 Table 1 to

§63.1349. - Summary of Performance Test Requirements. This report has also been sent to

"TCEQ Air Section Manager, Region 13" as required by SPECIAL CONDITION 13 E. The

TCEQ, Region 13 Air Section was notified of original testing on March 26, 2009 and then faxed

an amended notification on April 7, 2009 due to major repair work on the burner pipe. We have

also included the VOCs, HCL, CL2 and Metals (including Mercury) tests for more accurate

·emissions rates for our Emission Inventory, in which previously used were AP-42 factors. The

facility is testing under the promulgated National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutant

(NESHAP) regulations for the Portland Cement Industry.

Clean Air Engineering conducted the testing and has provided the final report of the results for

your review. If you have any concerns or questions, please contact me at 210-250-4009

concerning these reports.

Sincerely,

%y7Dabn;rr---

Environmental Manager

CEMEX Cement ofTexas, Balcones Plant

Attachments:

OP-CROI

cc: Amarjit Singh Gill, P.E, Director, Environmental- Environmental Affairs

Michael Gonzalez, Plant Manager

TCEQ Air Section Manager Region 13

United States Operations

2580 Wald Road, New Braunfels, Texas. 78132. USA. Phone: (830) 625-7338 New Braunfels, Fax: (210) 250-4044, (210) 250-4100 San Antonio
CleanAir.

CleanAir Engineering 321 Century Plaza

Suite 130

Houston, TX 77073-6041

800-723-0362

www.c1eanair.comlll>

Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-001749

CEMEX Cement ofTexas, LP

2580 Wald Road

New Braunfels, TX

REPORT ON COMPLIANCE TESTING

Performed for:

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

LINE 2 MAIN KILN STACK, LINE 2 CLINKER COOLER

BALCONES PLANT

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

Revision 0, Final: June 26, 2009

To the best ofour knowledge, the data presented in this report are accurate, complete,

error free, legible and representative ofthe actual emissions during the test program.

u

Submitted by,

(\)1(\'&\ \1l]£~~ai . ~Nunez

Project Manager

dnunez@cleanair.com

(800) 723-0362

RPTv4 6 3.dot

10773 -CEMEX a.doc

06262ii09 072800 10773

Reviewed by,

B~~1-- Southern Engineering Group Leader

bdelatte@cleanair.com

(800) 723-0362
:f)

CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

REVISION HISTORY

REPORT ON COMPLIANCE TESTING

DRAFT REPORT REVISION HISTORY

Revision: Date Pages Comments

DOa 06/25/09 All Draft version of original document.

FINAL REPORT REVISION HISTORY

Revision: Date Pages Comments

0 06/26/09 All Final version of original document.

Revision 0, Final

ii
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

CONTENTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

iii

1 PROJECT OVERViEW 1-1

INTRODUCTION 1-1

Key Project Participants 1-1

Test Program Parameters 1-1

TEST PROGRAM SYNOPSIS 1-3

Test Schedule 1-3

Table 1-1: Schedule of Activities 1-3

Results Summary 1-4

Table 1-2: Summary of Test Results 1-4

Table 1-3: Summary of Test Results 1-5

Discussion of Test Program 1-6

2 RESULTS 2-1

Table 2-1: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Filterable PM1o, Raw Mill On 2-1

Table 2-2: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Condensable PM, Raw Mill On 2-2

Table 2-3: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Filterable PM > 10l.lm, Raw Mill On 2-3

Table 2-4: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack -Total HCI, Raw Mill On 2-4

Table 2-5: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Total C12, Raw Mill On 2-5

Table 2-6: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Total NH3, Raw Mill On 2-6

Table 2-7: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - PCCDs/PCCDFs, Raw Mill On 2-7

Table 2-8: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - NOx, CO, S02, THC, Raw Mill On 2-8

Table 2-9: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Filterable PM1o, Raw Mill Off 2-9

Table 2-10: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Condensable PM, Raw Mill Off 2-10

Table 2-11: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Filterable PM > 10l.lm, Raw Mill Off 2-11

Table 2-12: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Total HCI, Raw Mill Off 2-12

Table 2-13: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Total C12, Raw Mill Off 2-13

Table 2-14: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Total NH3, Raw Mill Off .2-14

Table 2-15: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - PCCDs/PCCDFs, Raw Mill Off 2-15

Table 2-16: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - NOx, CO, S02, THC, Raw Mill Off 2-16

Table 2-17: Line 2 Clinker Cooler - Filterable PM1Q 2-17

Table 2-18: Line 2 Clinker Cooler - Condensable PM 2-18

Table 2-19: Line 2 Clinker Cooler - Filterable PM > 10l.lm 2-19

3 DESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION 3-1

PROCESS DESCRIPTION 3-1

Figure 3-1: Process Schematic 3-1

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLING LOCATIONS 3-2

Table 3-1: Sampling Points 3-2

Figure 3-2: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack Sampling Point Determination (EPA Method 1) 3-3

Figure 3-3: Line 2 Clinker Cooler Sampling Point Determination (EPA Method 1) 3-4

4 METHODOLOGY 4-1

Table 4-1: Summary of Sampling Procedures 4-1

5 APPENDiX 5-1

TEST METHOD SPECIFICATIONS A

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 8

Revision 0, Final
(---)

CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

CONTENTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

iv

)

PARAMETERS C

QAlQC DATA D

FIELD DATA E

FIELD DATA PRINTOUTS F

LABORATORY DATA G

PLANT DATA H

PROTOCOL 1

RESUMES J

Revision 0, Final
()

CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

1-1

INTRODUCTION

CEMEX Cement ofTexas, LP contracted Clean Air Engineering (CleanAir) to perform

emissions testing at their facility located in New Braunfels, TX for the purpose of

demonstrating compliance with EPA Federal Operating Permit No. 01126 and Special

Conditions ofTCEQ Permits Numbers 6048 and PSD-TX-74Ml.

All testing was conducted in accordance with the regulations set-forth by the United

States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Texas Commission on

Environmental Quality (TCEQ).

Key Project Participants

Individuals responsible for coordinating and conducting the test program were:

S. Dabney II - CEMEX Cement ofTexas, LP

B. Delatte - CleanAir

Test Program Parameters

The testing performed at the Line 2 Main Kiln Stack and Line 2 Clinker Cooler on

April 215t through 29th, 2009 included the following emissions measurements:

• particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter (filterable PMIO)

• condensable particulate matter (CPM)

• particulate matter greater than 10 microns in diameter

• total suspended particulate (TSP)

• hydrogen chloride (HCI)

• chlorine (CI2)

• ammonia (NH3)

• polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans

(PCDD/F)

• nitrogen oxide (NOx)

• sulfur dioxide (S02)

• carbon monoxide (CO)

• volatile organic compounds (VOC) as Total Hydrocarbons (THC)

• flue gas composition (e.g., 02, C02, H20)

• flue gas temperature

• flue gas flow rate

• mercury (Hg)

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

1-2

)

)

• trace metals: antimony (Sb), arsenic (As), barium (Ba), beryllium (Be),

cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), manganese (Mn),

molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), phosphorus (P), selenium (Se), silver (Ag),

thallium (TI), zinc (Zn)

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

1-3

TEST PROGRAM SYNOPSIS

Test Schedule

The on-site schedule followed during the test program is outlined in Table 1-1.

Table 1-1:

Schedule of Activities

Run start End

Number Location Method Analyte Date Time Time

Cooler Stack USEPA M201A1202 Particulate 4126/09 15:23 18:07

Cooler Stack USEPA M201A1202 Particulate 4/26/09 18:42 20:26

Cooler Stack USEPA M201A1202 Particulate 4/26/09 20:55 22:35

1 Kiln Stack USEPA Method 23 PCDD/F 04/23/09 12:13 15:38

2 Kiln Stack USEPA Method 23 PCDD/F 04/23/09 16:22 19:37

3 Kiln Stack USEPA Method 23 PCDD/F 04/23/09 19:37 22:57

Kiln Stack USEPA Methods, 6C, SO" NOx, CO, VOCs 04/23/09 12:13 15:14

7E, 10, 25A

Kiln Stack USEPA Methods, 6C, Se" NO", CO, VOCs 04/23109 17:01 18:01

7E, 10, 25A

Kiln Stack USEPA Methods, 6C, SO" NOx, CO, VOCs 04123/09 18:29 19:29

7E,10,25A

Kiln Stack USEPA Methods, 6C, SO" NOx, CO, VOCs 04/23/09 20:03 21:03

7E,10,25A

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 29 Trace Metals 04/25/09 09:26 11:48

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 29 Trace Metals 04/25/09 13:08 15:42

) Kiln Stack USEPA Method 29 Trace Metals 04/26/09 08:31 11:13

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 28 HCI 04/25/09 09:26 11:48

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 28 HCI 04/25/09 13:08 15:42

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 26 HCI 04/26/09 08:31 11:13

Kiln Stack USEPA M201A1202 Particulate 04/25/09 09:26 11:49

Kiln Stack USEPA M201A1202 Particulate 04/25/09 13:08 15:44

Kiln Stack USEPA M201A1202 Particulate 04/26/09 08:31 11:12

Kiln Stack USEPA Methods, 6C, SO" NOx, CO, VOCs 04/25/09 09:26 10:27

7E,10,25A

Kiln Stack USEPA Methods, 6C, S02, NOx, CO, VOCs 04/25/09 13:08 14:21

7E, 10, 25A

Kiln Stack USEPA Methods, Be, S02. NOx, CO, VOCs 04/25/09 18:45 19:46

7E,10,25A

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 25A VOCs 04/26/09 08:31 09:31

Kiln Stack USEPA M201A1202 Particulate 04/27/09 18:10 20:29

Kiln Stack USEPA M201A1202 Particulate 04/27/09 21:30 23:48

Kiln,Stack USEPA M201A1202 Particulate 04/27/09 14:31 16:59

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 29 Trace Metals 04/27/09 10:43 14:29

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 29 Trace Metals 04/27/09 18:10 20:29

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 29 Trace Metals 04/27/09 21:30 11:48

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 26 HCI 04/27/09 10:43 14:29

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 26 HCI 04/27/09 18:10 20:29

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 26 HCI 04/27/09 21:30 23:48

Kiln Stack USEPA Methods, 6C, SO" NO", CO, VOCs 04/27/09 10:43 12:31

7E, 10, 25A

Kiln Stack USEPA Methods, 6C, SO" NOx, CO, VOCs 04/27/09 18:10 19:10

7E, 10, 25A

Kiln Stack USEPA Methods, 6C, SO" NO", CO, VOCs 04/27/09 21:31 22:31

7E, 10, 25A

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 23 PCDD/F 04/28/09 10:10 13:24

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 23 PCDD/F 04/28/09 13:24 16:41

Kiln Stack USEPA Method 23 PCDD/F 04/28/09 16:41 19:55

) /'

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

PROJECT OVERVIEW

TEST PROGRAM SYNOPSIS (CONTINUED)

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

1-4

Results Summary

Table 1-2 and 1-3 summarize the results ofthe test program. A more detailed

presentation ofthe test conditions and results of analysis are shown in Tables 2-1

through 2..;19 on pages 2-1 through 2-19.

Table 1-2:

Summary of Test Results

Source Sampling Pending Permit

Constituent Method Average Emission Permit Limit1 Limit2

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack

Raw Mill On Iblhr TPY

PM,o (lb/hrffPY) EPA 201A10TM-028 <6.777 <29.683 8.06/27.09

FPM '0 (/b/hrfTPY) EPA 201A <1.729 <7.572 n.s. 10.72/36.01

CPM (/b/hrfTPY) EPAOTM-02B 5.048 22.111 n,s. 11.85/49.77

PM>10 (Ib/hr) EPA201A 2.101 9.202 n.s,

PM total (/b/hr) EPA 201A/OTM-02B <8.878 <38.885 9.6132.25

PM (front half) EPA 201A <3.630 <16.774 n.a, 12.76 I 42.87

PM (back half) EPA OTM-02B 5.048 22.111 n.s, 11.B5/49.77

HCI (lblhrffPY) EPA26A <0.027 <0.120 0.52/2.25

CI2 (lb/hrffPY) EPA26A 0.295 1.292 n.a.

NH3 (lb/hrffPY) EPA26A1CTM-027 <0.006 <0.028 n.s.

) PCCDsIPCCDFs(ng/dscm @7%O2) EPA 23 0.000005 0.20

NOx (Ib/hr I TPY) EPA 7E 317.15 1389.12 326.67 I 1431.0

CO (Ib/hr ffPY) EPA10 87.78 384.48 772.0/879.0

502 (Iblhr / TPY) EPA6C 0.17 0.73 106.0 I 58.0

VOC (Iblhr / TPY) EPA25A 3.08 13.49 13.07 /43.90

Raw Mill Off

PM,o (lb/hrffPY) EPA 201A10TM-028 <8.854 <38.779 8.06/27.09

FPM (lb/hrfTPY) EPA201A <1.664 <7.289 n.a. 10.72/36.01

CPM (lb/hrfTPY) EPAOTM-028 7.190 31.490 n.a. 11.85/49.77

PM>10 (/b/hr) EPA 201A <2.226 <9.749 n.s.

PM total (/b/hr) EPAOTM·028 <11.079 <48.527 9.6/32.25

PM (front half) EPA20tA <3.890 <17.037 n.a. 12.76/42.87

PM (back half) EPAOTM-028 7.190 31.490 n.a. 11.85/49.77

HCI (lb/hrffPY) EPA26A <0.027 <0.120 0.52/2.25

CI2 (lblhrffPY) EPA26A 0.295 1.292 n.s.

NH3 (lb/hrffPY) EPA26A1CTM·027 <0.006 <0.028 n.s.

PCCDsIPCCDFs

(ng/dscm @7%02) EPA 23 0.000003 0.20

NOx (Ib/hr / TPY) EPA 7E 304.40 1333.25 326.67 I 1431.0

CO (Ib/hr ffPY) EPA 10 102.28 448.00 772.0/879.0

802 (Ib/hr / TPY) EPA6C 0.32 1.39 106.0 I 58.0

VOC (Ib/hr I TPY) EPA25A 3.31 14.50 13.07 I 43.90

Line 2 Clinker Cooler

PM,o (lblhrffPY) EPA 201A10TM·028 <2.356 <10.317 6.02/20.23 7.87/26.45

FPM (lblhrfTPY) EPA 201A <1.241 <5.434 n.•.

CPM (lb/hrfTPY) EPA OTM-02B <1.115 <4.883 n.s.

PM>10 (Ib/hr) EPA201A <1.351 <5.918 n.a.

PM total (Ib/hr) EPA 201A/OTM-02B <3.707 <16.235 7.92/29.61 10.36/34.81

, Permit limits obtained from CEMEX EPA Federal Operating Permit No. 01126 and Special Conditions of TCea Permits Numbers 6048 and PSo-TX-74M1

2 Air Permit Amendment Supplement submitted on November 5, 2008. awaiting final determination by Air Permit Division, TCEQ Austin.

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

1-5

Table 1-3:

Summary of Test Results

Source Sampling

Constituent Method Emission Average

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Raw Mill On

Hg (Ib/hr) EPA M29 <4.506E-04 <4.490E-04 <4.510E-04 <4.502E-04

Sb (Ib/hr) EPAM29 O:OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO <5.011E-05 <i.670E-05

As (Ib/hr) EPAM29 <5.006E-05 <4.988E-05 <5.011E-05 <5.002E-05

Ba (Ib/hr) EPA M29 1.295E-02 1.343E-02 1.319E-02 i.319E-02

Be (Ib/hr) EPA M29 <1.252E-05 <1.247E-05 <1.253E-05 <i.25iE-05

Cd (Ib/hr) EPAM29 5.257E-06 1.821E-05 O.OOOE+OO 7.822E-06

Cr (Ib/hr) EPAM29 O.OOOE+OO 4.240E-05 O.OOOE+OO i.4i3E-05

Co (Ib/hr) EPA M29 <5.006E-05 <4.988E-05 <5.011E-05 <5.002E-05

Cu (Ib/hr) EPA M29 1.287E-04 1.207E-04 5.613E-05 i.018E-04

Pb (Ib/hr) EPA M29 O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

Mn (Ib/hr) EPAM29 9.437E-04 8.281E-04 4.635E-04 7.451E-04

Mo (Ib/hr) EPA M29 O.OOOE+OO 3.741E-05 O.OOOE+OO 1.247E-05

Ni (Ib/hr) EPA M29 1.928E-04 1.796E-04 8.519E-05 i.525E-04

Pb (Ib/hr) EPA M29 2.967E-02 3.081E-02 2.745E-02 2.93iE-02

Se (Ib/hr) EPA M29 <5.006E-05 <4.988E-05 <5.011 E-05 <5.002E-05

) Ag (Ib/hr) EPAM29 <5.006E-05 <4.988E-05 <5.011 E-05 <5.002E-05

TI (Ib/hr) EPAM29 <5.006E-05 <4.988E-05 <5.011E-05 <5.002E-05

Zn (Ib/hr) EPAM29 6.458E-03 2.519E-03 2.881E-04 3.089E-03

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack Run4 Run 5 Run 6

Raw Mill Off

Hg (Ib/hr) EPAM29 1.641E-04 1.957E-04 6.663E-04 3.420E-04

Sb (Ib/hr) EPAM29 <5.160E-05 <5.163E-05 O.OOOE+OO <3.44iE-05

As (Ib/hr) EPAM29 <5.160E-05 <5.163E-05 <5.165E-05 <5.i63E-05

Ba (Ib/hr) EPA M29 1.260E-02 1.256E-02 1.341E-02 i.286E-02

Be (Ib/hr) EPA.M29 <1.290E-05 <1.291 E-05 <1.291E-05 <i.29iE-05

Cd (Ib/hr) EPA M29 O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO 5.165E-07 i.722E-07

Cr (Ib/hr) EPAM29 O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

Co (Ib/hr) EPA M29 <5.160E-05 <5.163E-05 <5.165E-05 <5.163E-05

Cu (Ib/hr) EPA M29 1.429E-04 1.136E-05 O.OOOE+OO 5.i43E-05

Pb (Ib/hr) EPAM29 O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

Mn (Ib/hr) EPAM29 7.921 E-04 4.518E-04 1.291 E-05 4.i89E-04

Mo (Ib/hr) EPA M29 O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

Ni (Ib/hr) EPA M29 1.522E-04 5.938E-05 O.OOOE+OO 7.053E-05

Pb (Ib/hr) EPA M29 2.981E-02 2.854E-02 2.958E-02 2.931E-02

Se (Ib/hr) EPA M29 <5.160E-05 <5.163E-05 <5.165E-05 <5.i63E-05

Ag (Ib/hr) EPA M29 <5.160E-05 <5.163E-05 <5.165E-05 <5.i63E-05

TI (Ib/hr) EPA M29 <5.160E-05 <5.163E-05 <5.165E-05 <5.i63E-05

Zn (Ib/hr) EPA M29 2.400E-03 1.652E-03 O.OOOE+OO i.35iE-03

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

1-6

)

Discussion of Test Program

Clinker Cooler Stack

The test program began on April 22, 2009 at the Clinker Cooler Stack. One particulate

run was completed and another was started. During this time the facility was having

issues keeping the cooler baghouse running properly, which necessitated process and

control changes during the first run. In addition to this there were concerns that since

the facility recently came out of an outage a number ofissues existed which could

adversely impact the test. These included the facts that inventory was extremely low

from the outage and contributing to possible excessively dusty conditions, chemistry

was not optimal, and the lack of an established filter cake on the bags. Based on these

facts and an observed uncharacteristically dirty filter from the first run, it was

determined that the unit was not running in normal operating conditions and a

representative stack test could not be conducted at this time. As such, it was decided to

abort the second run and resume testing at this location at the end ofthe test program

starting over with three new test runs. Run 1 was collected and archived, but not

analyzed.

Testing resumed on the afternoon ofApril 26, 2009. In the morning testing had been

done at the main Kiln Stack during which time there were a number ofissues with the

fuel transport system. These issues carried over into the afternoon testing at the cooler

stack. During Run 3 (the first ofthe day) flows were observed to drop offsignificantly

part way through the test. This was related to the fuel transport system causing a

"push" and shutting down the unit. The delay extended long enough that it was not

reasonable to delay the test and the run was aborted.

When testing resumed the unit was still stabilizing, but no further upsets were

observed. Three runs (Runs 4-6) were completed and recovered. It was noted that the

cyclone from Run 4 had a significant, visible, amount ofparticulate. Prior testing at

this location, as well as all later runs, showed no to very little visible particulate from

this catch. It is believed that this is due to the unit not having settled out prior to the

beginning ofthe run. This run is reported (See tables 2-17 through 2-19) but not

included in the average since it is not believed to be representative of normal operation.

It should be pointed out that only the PM > 10 ~m portion ofthis run (the cyclone

rinse) was unusually high. The filterable PMIO and the condensable portions are in line

with the other 2 runs.

Main Kiln Stack

Testing began at the Kiln Stack on April 23, 2009 with the Raw Mill On. Three Dioxin

runs along with simultaneous CEMs runs for NOx, CO, S02, and THC were

conducted. Flows and moisture from the Dioxin runs were used to calculate mass

emission rates for each ofthe gaseous pollutants. After the first CEMs run, the NOx

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

1-7

monitor passed the bias check, but failed the drift check. The monitor was recalibrated

and a fourth run was required and completed.

The following day testing was delayed while ports were installed that were large

enough in diameter to accommodate the PMIO probes. During this time data from the

previous day's testing was further analyzed and it was discovered that the NOx

emissions were over the permitted limit. After a thorough investigation, it was

discovered that the control system that regulates ammonia injection determines the

amount of ammonia to inject based upon a calculated emission rate which is

determined from a flow calculated using a fixed moisture constant. Comparison ofthis

constant moisture percentage to that determined by Clean Air's reference method tests

revealed a difference of a couple percentage points. While facility CEMs were

reasonably close to the reference method CEMs (within 5%), this small discrepancy in

moisture was enough to affect the calculated flows enough that the facility was actually

slightly over the permitted limit even though the system was reporting under.

Prior to the beginning oftesting the following day, the facility adjusted their moisture

constant to be in line with what Clean Air was measuring. Also the control system's

ammonia set point was adjusted based on reference method lb/hr measurements.

) Reported CEMs emissions are those from testing conducted after the changes to the

ammonia injection control system were made. For completeness, the original CEMs

runs are located in the appendix ofthis report.

Testing conducted on April 25, 2009 was comprised ofsimultaneous runs of

particulate, metals, HCI, C12, ammonia, as well as all the previously mentioned CEMs.

The THC monitor did not pass the Run 1 bias, so an additional THC run was planned.

Two sets ofruns were completed and a third was started. Two minutes into Run 3, the

wet method tests had to be halted due to a failure ofthe particulate probe. While

repairs began, CEMs Run 3 continued. Ultimately, it was determined that the final wet

methods runs were to be delayed until the following day, but the CEMs run finished.

An additional velocity traverse was conducted on the stack in order to provide flow

data for mass emission calculations for this run.

On April 26, 2009 the final wet method runs were finished along with the THe run

required by the THC bias failure the previous day. During the particulate run, it was

suspected that filter plugging was causing high vacuum and the PMIO head was

switched out. Both filters were recovered, analyzed, and summed for emission

calculations. The front halfrinse from both heads were combined as were the cyclone

rinses.

)

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

1-8

)

When testing resumed on April 27, 2009, the raw mill was turned off and the Kiln

Stack test program was repeated. CEMs, particulate, HCl, C12, ammonia, and metals

were once again measured. Three runs of each (Runs 4-7) were conducted. During this

time there were two notable incidents. The first was a noticeable reddish brown color

observed in the first three impingers ofthe metals trains from Runs 4 and 5. The

facility had observed this phenomenon before in water exiting the bottom ofthe stack

after heavy rains. It is believed to be rust. The second was a back flushing ofthe

particulate train during a post run leak check for Run 4, which necessitated another run

be performed. This run was conducted the following day, along with three dioxin runs.

End ofSection 1 - Project Overview

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-1

Table 2-1:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Filterable PM1o, Raw Mill On

Run No. 2 4 Average

Date (2009) Apr 25 Apr 25 Apr 26

Start Time (approx.) 09:26 13:08 08:31

Stop lime (approx.) 11:49 15:44 11 :12

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate (Ton Clinker/hour) 155 155 155 155

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 8.0 7.6 7.2 7.6

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 22.0 21.4 19.6 21.0

Ts Sample temperature ('F) 209 227 217 218

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 11.30 13.05 11.93 12.09

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 252,756 268,305 275,611 265,557

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 194,436 200,808 209,197 201,481

Qstd Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 172,457 174,609 184,244 177,103

Sampling Data

Vms1d Volume metered, standard (dscf) 44.8260 46.0110 44.6154 45.1508

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 100.7553 100.5030 91.1141 97.4574

Filterable Particulate Matter < 10 11m (FPM,o) Laboratory Data

mpPM10 Filterable particulate matter < 10 11m (FPM,o) collected (g <0.00333 <0.00333 <0.00333

Filterable Particulate Matter < 10 11m (FPM,o) Results

Csd Particulate Concentration (Ib/dscf) <1.638E-07 <1.596E-07 <1.646E-07 <1.627E-07

Elblhr Particulate Rate (Ib/hr) <1.6949 <1.6719 <1.8193 <1.7287

ETlyr Particulate Rate (Ton/yr) <7.4238 <7.3229 <7.9687 <7.5718

ERp Particulate Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) <0.0109 <0.0108 <0.0117 <0.0111

Revision 0, Final
-.,j

CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-2

Table 2-2:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Condensable PM, Raw Mill On

Run No. 2 4 Average

Date (2009) Apr 25 Apr 25 Apr 26

Start TIme (approx.) 09:26 13:08 08:31

Stop Time (approx.) 11:49 15:44 11:12

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate (Ton Clinker/hour) 155 155 155 155

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 8.0 7.6 7.2 7.6

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 22.0 21.4 19.6 21.0

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 209 227 217 218

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 11.30 13.05 11.93 12.09

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 252,756 268,305 275,611 265,557

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 194,436 200,808 209,197 201,481

QSld Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 172,457 174,609 184,244 177,103

Sampling Data

Vmstd Volumemetered, standard (dscf) 44.8260 46.0110 44.6154 45.1508

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 100.7553 100.5030 91.1141 97.4574

Laboratory Data

miT Total Inorganic CPM Result (g) 0.01178 0.00312 0.00936

moo Total Organic CPM Result (g) 0.00355 0.00131 0.00000

mT Total Gravimetric Result (g) 0.01533 0.00443 0.00936

mCPM Total CPM (g) 0.01533 0.00443 0.00936

Condensable Particulate Results

Csd Particulate Concentration (Ib/dscf) 7.541E-07 2.125E-07 4.627E-07 4.764E-07

E1t.lhr Particulate Rate (Ib/hr) 7.8027 2.2266 5.1152 5.0482

ET1yr Particulate Rate (Ton/yr) 34.1759 9.7527 22.4044 22.1110

ERp Particulate Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) 0.0502 0.0143 0.0329 0.0325

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-3

Table 2-3:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Filterable PM > 101Jm, Raw Mill On

Run No. 2 4 Average

Date (2009) Apr25 Apr 25 Apr 26

Start Time (approx.) 09:26 13:08 08:31

Stop Time (approx.) 11:49 15:44 11:12

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate (Ton Clinker/hour) 155 155 155 155

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 8.0 7.6 7.2 7.6

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 22.0 21.4 19.6 21.0

Ts Sample temperature ('F) 209 227 217 218

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 11.30 13.05 11.93 12.09

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 252,756 268,305 275,611 265,557

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 194,436 200,808 209,197 201,481

QS1d Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 172,457 174,609 184,244 177,103

Sampling Data

Vmstd Volume metered, standard (dscf) 44.8260 46.0110 44.6154 45.1508

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 100.7553 100.5030 91.1141 97.4574 "

) Filterable Particulate Matter> 10 11m (FPM,) Laboratory Data

mFPM> Filterable particulate matter> 10 11m (FPM,) collected (g) 0.00355 0.00446 0.00413

Filterable Particulate Matter> 10 11m (FPM,) Results

Csd Particulate Concentration (Ib/dscf) 1.746E-07 2.137E-07 2.041 E-07 1.975E-07

E1blhr Particulate Rate (Ib/hr) 1.8069 2.2392 2.2564 2.1009

ET/yr Particulate Rate (Ton/yr) 7.9143 9.8079 9.8831 9.2017

ERP Particulate Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) 0.0116 0.0144 0.0145 0.0135

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-4

Table 2-4:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack -Total Hel, Raw Mill On

Run No. 2 4 Average

Date (2009) Apr 25 Ap(25 Apr 26

Start Time (approx.) 09:26 13:08 08:31

Stop Time (approx.) 11:48 15:42 11 :13

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate - (Ton Clinker/hour) 155 155 155 155

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (d~ volume %) 7.4 9.2 7.4 8.0

CO2 Carbon dioxide (d~ volume %) 21.6 18.0 20.6 20.1

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 210 229 218 219

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 14.94 11.95 14.13 13.67

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 259,571 268,373 237,535 255,160

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 199,234 200,373 179,872 193,160

Qstd Volumetric flow rate, d~ standard (dscfm) 169,477 176,422 154,452 166,784

Sampling Data

Vms1d Volume metered, standard (dscf) 82.5757 85.4126 76.4884 81.4923

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 101.5680 100.9216 98.4127 100.3008

Laborato~Data

mn Total HCI collected (mg) <0.03926 <0.02997 0.23742

Hydrogen Chloride (HCI) Results

Csd HCI Concentration (Ib/dscf) <1.048E-09 <7.736E-10 6.844E-09 <2.889E-09

E1blhr HCI Rate (Ib/hr) <0.0107 <0.0082 0.0634 <0.0274

ETlyr HCI Rate (Ton/yr) <0.0467 <0.0359 0.2778 <0.1201

ERp HCI Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0004 <0.0002

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-5

)

Table 2-5:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Total C12, Raw Mill On

Run No. 2 4 Average

Date (2009) Apr 25 Apr 25 Apr 26

Start Time (approx.) 09:26 13:08 08:31

Stop Time (approx.) 11:48 15:42 11 :13

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate - (Ton Clinker/hour) 155 155 155 155

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 7.4 9.2 7.4 8.0

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 21.6 18.0 20.6 20.1

Ts Sample temperature CF) 210 229 218 219

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 14.94 11.95 14.13 13.67

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 259,571 268,373 237,535 255,160

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 199,234 200,373 179,872 193,160

Qstd Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 169,477 176,422 154,452 166,784

Sampling Data

Vrrstd Volume metered, standard (dscf) 82.5757 85.4126 76.4884 81.4923

%1 lsokinetic sampling (%) 101.5680 100.9216 98.4127 100.3008

Laboratory Data

mn Total Cl2 collected (mg) 0.89698 1.34673 1.02292

Chlorine (C12) Results

Csd Chlorine Concentration (Ib/dscf) 2.395E-08 3.477E-08 2.949E-08 2.940E-08

E1blhr Chlorine Rate (Ib/hr) 0.2436 0.3680 0.2733 0.2950

ETlyr Chlorine Rate (Ton/yr) 1.0668 1.6119 1.1970 1.2919

ERp Chlorine Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) 0.0016 0.0024 0.0018 0.0019

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-6

Table 2-6:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Total NH3 • Raw Mill On

Run No. 2 4 Average

Date (2009) Apr 25 Apr 25 Apr 26

Start Time (approx.) 09:26 13:08 08:31

Stop Time (approx.) 11:48 15:42 11 :13

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate - (Ton Clinker/hour) 155 155 155 155

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 7.4 9.2 7.4 8.0

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 21.6 18.0 20.6 20.1

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 210 229 218 219

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 14.94 11.95 14.13 13.67

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 259,571 268,373 237,535 255,160

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 199,234 200,373 179,872 193,160

Qstd Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 169,477 176,422 154,452 166,784

Sampling Data

Vms1d Volume metered, standard (dscf) 82.5757 85.4126 76.4884 81.4923

) %1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 101.5680 100.9216 98.4127 100.3008 I

Laboratory Data

mn Total NH3 collected (mg) <0.02575 <0.01966 <0.02461

Ammonia (NH3) Results

Csd Ammonia Concentration (Ib/dscf) <6.877E-10 <5.074E-10 <7.096E-10 <6.349E-10

E1blhr Ammonia Rate (Ib/hr) <0.0070 <0.0054 <0.0066 <0.0063

ETlyr Ammonia Rate (Ton/yr) <0.0306 <0.0235 <0.0288 <0.0277

ERp Ammonia Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) <0.0000 <0.0000 <0.0000 <0.0000

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-7

Table 2-7:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - PCCDs/PCCDFs, Raw Mill On

Run No. 2 3 Average

Date (2009) Apr 23 Apr 23 Apr 23

Start Time (approx.) 12:13 16:22 19:37

Stop Time (approx.) 15:38 19:37 22:57

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate - (Ton Clinker/hour) 155 155 155 155

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 7.7000 8.2000 7.5000 7.8000

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 21.7000 21.0000 21.7000 21.4667

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 218.0 218.4 213.0 216.5

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 12.4954 13.2128 13.3277 13.0119

Gas Flow Rate

Os Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 240,596 255,284 248,437 248,106

Os Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 182,666 193,707 190,028 188,801

OSld Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 159,842 168,113 164,702 164,219

Sampling Data

V_ Volume metered, standard (dscl) 117.6858 131.7431 122.6914 124.0401

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 102.3192 99.8513 103.5234 101.8980

Laboratory Data from USEPA Method 23

Total PCDDs (ng) 0.0183 0.0365 0.0000

Total PCDFs (ng) 0.0000 0.0046 0.0000

mn Total PCDDs & PCDFs (ng) 0.0183 0.0411 0.0000

Total TEO PCDDs (ng) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total TEO PCDFs (ng) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

m"-TEQ Total TEO PCDDs & PCDFs (ng) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total PCDD/F TEO Results (using USEPAJINTL 1989 TEFs)

CSdTEQ TEO Concentration (ng/dscm) 5.491E-06 7.960E-06 O.OOOE+OO 4.484E-06

CSd7TEQ TEO Concentration @7% O2 (ng/dscm) 5.782E-06 8.712E-06 O.OOOE+OO 4.831E-06

ElblhrTEQ TEO Rate (Ib/hr) 3.288E-12 5.014E-12 O.OOOE+OO 2.767E-12

ERPTEO TEO Rate - Production-based (Ibffon Clinker) 2.116E-14 3.227E-14 O.OOOE+OO 1.781E-14

Revision 0, Final
.-,

)

CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-8

)

./

Table 2-8:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - NOx, CO, S02, THC, Raw Mill On

Run No. 2 3 4 Average

Date (2009) Apr 25 Apr 25 Apr 25 Apr 26

Start Time 9:27 13:09 18:46 8:31

End Time 10:27 14:21 19:46 9:31

Elapsed Time 1:00 1:12 1:00 1:00

Operating Conditions

Production Rate - Line 2 Kiln Stack (Ton Clinker/hr) 155.396 155.397 155.409 155.399 155.400

Gas Parameters

Actual Gas Flow Rate - Line 2 Kiln Stack (acfm) 256,405 258,506 257,078 268,332 260,080

Standard Gas Flow Rate - Line 2 Kiln Stack (scfm) 197,295 193,333 194,994 203,656 197,319

Dry Standard Gas Flow Rate - Line 2 Kiln Stack (dscfm) 166,762 164,765 165,737 173,558 167,706

H20 - Line 2 Kiln Stack (%) 15.476 14.777 15.010 14.779 15.010

Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) - Line 2 Kiln Stack

Concentration (ppmdv) 265.16 .259.24 276.80 267.D7

Mass Rate (Ib/hr) 316.78 306.01 328.66 317.15

Mass Rate (lblTon Clinker) 2.04 1.97 2.11 2.04

Carbon Monoxide (CO) - Line 2 Kiln Stack

Concentration (ppmdv) 124.87 119.96 119.38 121.40

Mass Rate (Ib/hr) 90.83 86.22 86.30 87.78

Mass Rate (lblTon Clinker) 0.58 0.55 0.56 0.56

Sulfur Dioxide (502) - Line 2 Kiln Stack

Concentration (ppmdv) 0.02 0.13 0.15 0.10

Mass Rate (Ib/hr) 0.03 0.22 0.25 0.17

Mass Rate (lblTon Clinker) 2.08E-04 1.40E-03 1.60E-03 1.07E-03

Total Hydrocarbons (THC) - Line 2 Kiln Stack

Concentration (ppmwv) 2.00 2.13 2.66 2.27

Mass Rate (Ib/hr) 2.66 2.86 3.72 3.08

Mass Rate (lblTon Clinker) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-9

)

Table 2-9:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Filterable PM10, Raw Mill Off

Run No. 6 7 8 Average

Date (2009) Apr27 Apr 27 Apr 28

Start Time (approx.) 18:10 21:30 14:31

Stop Time (approx.) 20:29 23:48 16:59

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate (Ton Clinker/hour) 158 156 158 158

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 6.0 6.0 6.3 6.1

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 24.6 24.0 24.0 24.2

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 307 323 370 333

Bw . Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 12.55 12.63 10.37 11.85

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 282,046 285,510 300,070 289,209

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 189,206 187,670 186,105 187,660

QSld Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 165,459 163,965 166,804 165,410

Sampling Data

Vmstd Volume metered, standard (dscf) 44.9884 44.8238 44.6969 44.8364

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 105.1393 107.9058 102.5307 105.1919

Filterable Particulate Matter < 10 IJm (FPM,o) Laboratory Data

mFPM'O Filterable particulate matter < 10 IJm (FPM,o) collected (9 <0.00333 0.00357 <0.00333

Filterable Particulate Matter < 10 IJm (FPM,o) Results

Csd Particulate Concentration (Ib/dscf) <1.632E-07 1.756E-07 <1.643E-07 <1.677E-07

E1blhr Particulate Rate (Ib/hr) <1.6203 1.7277 <1.6441 <1.6640

ETlyr Particulate Rate (Ton/yr) <7.0969 7.5674 <7.2012 <7.2885

ERp Particulate Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) <0.0102 0.0111 <0.0104 <0.0106

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-10

Table 2-10:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Condensable PM, Raw Mill Off

Run No. 6 7 8 Average

Date (2009) Apr 27 Apr 27 Apr 28

Start Time (approx.) 18:10 21:30 14:31

Stop Time (approx.) 20:29 23:48 16:59

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate (Ton Clinker/hour) 158 156 158 158

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 6.0 6.0 6.3 6.1

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 24.6 24.0 24.0 24.2

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 307 323 370 333

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 12.55 12.63 10.37 11.85

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 282,046 285,510 300,070 289,209

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 189,206 187,670 186,105 187,660

QStd Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 165,459 163,965 166,804 165,410

Sampling Data

Vmstd Volume metered, standard (dscf) 44.9884 44.8238 44.6969 44.8364

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 105.1393 107.9058 102.5307 105.1919

) Laboratory Data

miT Total Inorganic CPM Result (g) 0.01221 0.00577 0.02028

mno Total Organic CPM Result (g) 0.00000 0.00582 0.00000

mT Total Gravimetric Result (g) 0.01221 0.01160 0.02028

mCPM Total CPM (g) 0.01221 0.01160 0.02028

Condensable Particulate Results

CSd Particulate Concentration (Ib/dscf) 5.986E-07 5.705E-07 1.001 E-06 7.232E-Q7

E1blhr Particulate Rate (Ib/hr) 5.9423 5.6124 10.0140 7.1896

ETlyr Particulate Rate (Ton/yr) 26.0272 24.5821 43.8614 31.4902

ERp Particulate Rate - Production-based (IblTon Clinker) 0.0375 0.0359 0.0632 0.0456

Revision 0, Final
.,

)

CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-11

)

Table 2-11:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Filterable PM > 10J,Jm, Raw Mill Off

Run No. 6 7 8 Average

Date (2009) Apr 27 Apr27 Apr 28

Start Time (approx.) 18:10 21:30 14:31

Stop Time (approx.) 20:29 23:48 16:59

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate (Ton Clinker/hour) 158 156 158 158

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 6.0 6.0 6.3 6.1

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 24.6 24.0 24.0 24.2

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 307 323 370 333

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 12.55 12.63 10.37 11.85

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 282,046 285,510 300,070 289,209

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 189,206 187,670 186,105 187,660

QSId Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 165,459 163,965 166,804 165,410

Sampling Data

Vms1d Volume metered, standard (dscf) 44.9884 44.8238 44.6969 44.8364

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 105.1393 107.9058 102.5307 105.1919

Filterable Particulate Matter> 10 fJm (FPM» Laboratory Data

mFPM> Filterable particulate matter> 10 fJm (FPM» collected (g) 0.00622 <0.00333 0.00413

Filterable Particulate Matter> 10 fJm (FPM» Results

Coo Particulate Concentration (Ib/dscf) 3.049E-07 <1.638E-07 2.037E-07 <2.241E-07

E1blhr Particulate Rate (Ib/hr) 3.0265 <1.6116 2.0391 <2.2257

ET1yr Particulate Rate (Ton/yr) 13.2561 <7.0586 8.9313 <9.7487

ERp Particulate Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) 0.0191 <0.0103 0.0129 <0.0141

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-12

Table 2-12:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Total Hel, Raw Mill Off

Run No. 5 6 7 Average

Date (2009) Apr 27 Apr 27 Apr 27

Start Time (approx.) 10:43 18:10 21:30

Stop Time (approx.) 14:29 20:29 23:48

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate - (Ton Clinker/hour) 156 158 156 157

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 5.8 6.0 6.0 5.9

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 25.2 24.4 23.4 24.3

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 304 309 326 313

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 15.16 12.98 13.10 13.75

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 227,266 286,246 274,323 262,612

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 153,028 191,519 179,696 174,748

Qstd Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 129,835 166,651 156,157 150,881

Sampling Data

"

\ Vmstd Volume metered, standard (dscf) 66.9929 82.8480 77.5162 75.7857

) %1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 102.5389 98.7923 98.6465 99.9926

Laboratory Data

mn Total HCI collected (mg) <0.03403 <0.03718 <0.03217

Hydrogen Chloride (HCI) Results

Csd HCI Concentration (Ib/dscf) <1.120E-09 <9.895E-10 <9.150E-10 <1.008E-09

E1blhr HCI Rate (Ib/hr) <0.0087 <0.0099 <0.0086 <0.0091

ET/yr HCI Rate (Ton/yr) <0.0382 <0.0433 <0.0376 <0.0397

ERp HCI Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-13

J

Table 2-13:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Total C12, Raw Mill Off

Run No. 5 6 7 Average

Date (2009) Apr 27 Apr 27 Apr 27

Start Time (approx.) 10:43 18:10 21:30

Stop Time (approx.) 14:29 20:29 23:48

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate - (Ton Clinker/hour) 156 158 156 157

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 5.8 6.0 6.0 5.9

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 25.2 24.4 23.4 24.3

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 304 309 326 313

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 15.16 12.98 13.10 13.75

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 227,266 286,246 274,323 262,612

Q. Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 153,028 191,519 179,696 174,748

Q.td Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 129,835 166,651 156,157 150,881

Sampling Data

Vmstd Volume metered, standard (dscf) 66.9929 82.8480 77.5162 75.7857

%1 lsokinetic sampling (%) 102.5389 98.7923 98.6465 99.9926

Laboratory Data

mn Total CI2 collected (mg) 1.30343 1.08956 0.89411

Chlorine (CI2) Results

Csd Chlorine Concentration (Ib/dscf) 4.290E-08 2.900E-08 2.543E-08 3.244E-08

Elb/hr Chlorine Rate (Ib/hr) 0.3342 0.2900 0.2383 0.2875

ETlyr Chlorine Rate (Ton/yr) 1.4638 1.2700 1.0437 1.2592

ERp Chlorine Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) 0.0021 0.0018 0.0015 0.0018

Revision 0, Final
'"

)

CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-14

Table 2-14:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - Total NHa, Raw Mill Off

Run No. 5 6 7 Average

Date (2009) Apr 27 Apr 27 Apr 27

Start Time (approx.) 10:43 18:10 21:30

Stop Time (approx.) 14:29 20:29 23:48

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate - (Ton Clinker/hour) 156 158 156 157

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 5.8 6.0 6.0 5.9

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 25.2 24.4 23.4 24.3

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 304 309 326 313

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 15.16 12.98 13.10 13.75

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 227,266 286,246 274,323 262,612

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 153,028 191,519 179,696 174,748

Qs1d Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 129,835 166,651 156,157 150,881

Sampling Data

Vmstd Volume metered, standard (dscf) 66.9929 82.8480 77.5162 75.7857

) %1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 102.5389 98.7923 98.6465 99.9926

Laboratory Data

mn Total NH3 collected (mg) 24.42921 31.91887 27.93553

Ammonia (NH3) Results

Csd Ammonia Concentration (Ib/dscf) 8.041E-07 8.495E-07 7.946E-07 8.161E-07

E1blhr Ammonia Rate (Ib/hr) 6.2637 8.4944 7.4453 7.4012

ET/yr Ammonia Rate (Ton/yr) 27.4350 37.2056 32.6106 32.4171

ERp Ammonia Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) 0.0401 0.0536 0.0477 0.0471

)

Revision 0, Final
"-)

CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-15

Table 2-15:

Line 2 Main Kiln Stack - PCCDs/PCCDFs, Raw Mill Off

Run No. 4 5 6 Average

Date (2009) Apr2B Apr2B Apr2B

Start Time (approx.) 10:10 13:24 16:41

Stop Time (approx.) 13:24 16:41 19:55

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate - (Ton Clinker/hour) 155 155 155 155

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 5.9000 6.0000 4.8000 5.5667

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 25.1000 24.2000 25.2000 24.8333

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 364.2 369.9 364.2 366.1

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 11.7693 11.6776 11.3789 11.6086

Gas Flow Rate

Q, Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 269,766 272,657 271,424 271,282

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 168,010 169,493 169,037 168,847

QStd Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 148,237 149,700 149,802 149,246

Sampling Data

Vmstd Volume metered, standard (dscf) 113.3170 107.7772 114.0954 111.7299

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 97.4015 95.3814 97.0458 96.6096

Laboratory Data from USEPA Method 23

) Total PCDDs (ng) 0.0236 0.0000 0.0190

Total PCDFs (ng) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

mn Total PCDDs & PCDFs (ng) 0.0236 0.0000 0.0190

Total TEQ PCDDs (ng) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total TEQ PCDFs (ng) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

mn_TEQ Total TEQ PCDDs & PCDFs (ng) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total PCDD/F TEQ Results (using USEPA/INTL 1989 TEFs)

CsdTEO TEQ Concentration (ng/dscm) 5.328E-06 O.OOOE+OO 5.880E-06 3.736E-06

Csd7TEO TEQ Concentration @7% O2 (ng/dscm) 4.938E-06 O.OOOE+OO 5.077E-06 3.338E·06

EII"hrTEO TEQ Rate (Ib/hr) 2.959E-12 O.OOOE+OO 3.300E-12 2.087E-12

ERpTEO TEQ Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) 1.904E-14 O.OOOE+OO 2.124E-14 1.343E-14

)

Revision 0, Final
",)

CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-16

Table 2-16:

Line 2 Main Kiln Slack - NOx, CO, 502, THC, Raw Mill Off

Run No. 5 6 7 Average

Date (2009) Apr 27 Apr 27 Apr 27

Start Time 10:43 18:10 21:31

End Time 12:31 19:10 22:31

Elapsed Time 1:47 1:00 1:00

Operating Conditions

Production Rate - Line 2 Kiln Stack (Ton Clinker/hr) 156.295 158.425 156.144 156.954

Gas Parameters

Actual Gas Flow Rate - Line 2 Kiln Stack (acfm) 262,579 256,976 267,597 262,384

Standard Gas Flow Rate - Line 2 Kiln Stack (scfm) 175,990 172,160 175,486 174,545

Dry Standard Gas Flow Rate - Line 2 Kiln Stack (dscfm) 153,578 148,697 151,327 151,201

H20 - Line 2 Kiln Stack (0/0) 12.735 12.735 12.735 12.735

Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) - Line 2 Kiln Stack

Concentration (ppmdv) 282.47 277.95 282.54 280.99

Mass Rate (Ib/hr) 310.79 296.09 306.31 304.40

Mass Rate (lblTon Clinker) 1.99 1.87 1.96 1.94

Carbon Monoxide (CO) - Line 2 Kiln Stack

Concentration (ppmdv) 151.84 158.69 154.84 155.12

Mass Rate (Ib/hr) 101.72 102.92 102.21 102.28

Mass Rate (lblTon Clinker) 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65

-") Sulfur Dioxide (S02) - Line 2 Kiln Stack

Concentration (ppmdv) 0.18 0.24 0.21 0.21

Mass Rate (Ib/hr) 0.28 0.35 0.32 0.32

Mass Rate (lblTon Clinker) 1.81E-03 2.21E-03 2.06E-03 2.03E-03

Total Hydrocarbons (THC) - Line 2 Kiln Stack

Concentration (ppmwv) 2.57 2.81 2.97 2.78

Mass Rate (Ib/hr) 3.10 3.29 3.54 3.31

Mass Rate (lblTon Clinker) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-17

Table 2-17:

Line 2 Clinker Cooler - Filterable PM10

Run No. 4" 5 6 Average

Date (2009) Apr 26 Apr 26 Apr 26

Start Time (approx.) 15:23 18:42 20:55

Stop Time (approx.) 18:07 20:26 22:35

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate (Ton Clinker/hour) 155 155 155 155

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 20.1 19.8 19.7 19.8

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 184 177 172 175

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 1.94 2.80 3.21 3.00

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 141,658 142,739 142,337 142,538

Q s Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 113,046 115,167 115,709 115,438

Q'td Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 110,853 111,947 111,996 111,971

Sampling Data

Vmstd Volume metered, standard (dscf) 65.6484 39.9142 39.6070 39.7606

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 89.8718 105.7965 88.2960 97.0463

) Filterable Particulate Matter < 10 IJm (FPM10) Laboratory Data

mFPM10 Filterable particulate matter < 10 IJm (FPM1o) collected (g <0.00333 <0.00333 <0.00333

Filterable Particulate Matter < 10 IJm (FPM10) Results

Csd Particulate Concentration (Ib/dscf) <1.118E-07 <1.840E-07 <1.854E-07 <1.847E-07

E1blhr Particulate Rate (Ib/hr) <0.7439 <1.2356 <1.2458 <1.2407

ET/yr Particulate Rate (Ton/yr) <3.2584 <5.4120 <5.4564 <5.4342

ERp Particulate Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) <0.0048 <0.0080 <0.0080 <0.0080

Average includes 2 runs. "indicates that the run is not included in the average.

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-18

Table 2-18:

Line 2 Clinker Cooler - Condensable PM

Run No. 4- 5 6 Average

Date (2009) Apr 26 Apr 26 Apr 26

Start Time (approx.) 15:23 18:42 20:55

Stop Time (approx.) 18:07 20:26 22:35

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate (Ton Clinker/hour) 155 155 155 155

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 20.1 19.8 19.7 19.8

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 184 177 172 175

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 1.94 2.80 3.21 3.00

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 141,658 142,739 142,337 142,538

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 113,046 115,167 115,709 115,438

Qstd Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 110,853 111,947 111,996 111,971

Sampling Data

Vmstd Volume metered, standard (dscf) 65.6484 39.9142 39.6070 39.7606

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 89.8718 105.7965 88.2960 97.0463

Laboratory Data

miT Total Inorganic CPM Result (g) 0.00368 0.00057 0.00356

moo Total Organic CPM Result (g) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

mT Total Gravimetric Result (g) 0.00368 0.00057 0.00356

mCPM Total CPM (g) 0.00368 <0.00242 0.00356

Condensable Particulate Results

Csd Particulate Concentration (Ib/dscf) 1.236E-07 <1.337E-07 1.982E-07 <1.659E-07

Eiblhr Particulate Rate (Ib/hr) 0.8221 <0.8980 1.3318 <1.1149

ETlyr Particulate Rate (Ton/yr) 3.6008 <3.9331 5.8333 <4.8832

ERp Particulate Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) 0.0053 <0.0058 0.0086 <0.0072

Average includes 2 runs. - indicates that the run is not included in the average.

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

RESULTS

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

2-19

)

Table 2-19:

Line 2 Clinker Cooler- Filterable PM > 10J./m

Run No. 4" 5 6 Average

Date (2009) Apr 26 Apr 26 Apr 26

Start Time (approx.) 15:23 18:42 20:55

Stop Time (approx.) 18:07 20:26 22:35

Process Conditions

Rp Production rate (Ton Clinker/hour) 155 155 155 155

Cap Capacity factor (hours/year) 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

Gas Conditions

O2 Oxygen (dry volume %) 20.1 19.8 19.7 19.8

CO2 Carbon dioxide (dry volume %) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1

Ts Sample temperature (OF) 184 177 172 175

Bw Actual water vapor in gas (% by volume) 1.94 2.80 3.21 3.00

Gas Flow Rate

Q. Volumetric flow rate, actual (acfm) 141,658 142,739 142,337 142,538

Qs Volumetric flow rate, standard (scfm) 113,046 115,167 115,709 115,438

Qstd Volumetric flow rate, dry standard (dscfm) 110,853 111,947 111,996 111,971

Sampling Data

Vmstd Volume metered, standard (dscf) 65.6484 39.9142 39.6070 39.7606

%1 Isokinetic sampling (%) 89.8718 105.7965 88.2960 97.0463

Filterable Particulate Matter> 10 11m (FPM» Laboratory Data

mFPM> Filterable particulate matter> 10 IJm (FPM» collected (g) 0.12384 <0.00333 0.00392

Filterable Particulate Matter> 10 11m (FPM» Results

CSd Particulate Concentration (Ib/dscf) 4.160E-06 <1.840E-07 2.182E-07 <2.011E-07

E1blhr Particulate Rate (Ib/hr) 27.6657 <1.2356 1.4665 <1.3511

ETlyr Particulate Rate (Ton/yr) 121.1759 <5.4120 6.4232 <5.9176

ERp Particulate Rate - Production-based (lblTon Clinker) 0.1780 <0.0080 0.0094 <0.0087

Average includes 2 runs. "indicates that the run is not included in the average.

End of Section 2 - Results

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

DESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

3-1

) --/1

PROCESS DESCRIPTION

The Balcones Plant is a "straight-line plant", which means that it is designed so that the

process moves in a straight path from where raw materials are introduced to where the

finished product is produced. Equipment upgrades and operational adjustments have

increased the plants capacity. The plant now produces over 1.1 million tons of cement

annually, and is one ofthe most efficient CEMEX plants in the country.

The testing reported in this document was performed at the Line 2 Main Kiln Stack and

the Line 2 Clinker Cooler.

A schematic ofthe process indicating sampling locations is shown in Figure 3-1.

<;jlIl....

gJ~J:l~j

Figure 3-1: Process Schematic

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

DESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

3-2

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLING LOCATIONS

Sampling point locations were determined according to EPA Method 1.

Table 3-1 outlines the sampling point configurations. Figure 3-:2 through 3-3 illustrate

the sampling points and orientation ofsampling ports for each ofthe sources tested in

the program.

Table 3-1:

Sampling Points

Source Run Points per Minutes per Total

Constituent Method No. Ports Port Point Minutes

Line 2 Kiln Stack

TSP, PM10• CPM EPA 201A1202 1_81 4 3 10 120

NOx. CO. S02. THC3 EPA M25A 1_81 CEMs 1 60 60

Hg. Trace Metals EPAM29 1_81 4 3 10 120

HCI/CI2/NH4 EPM M26A 1_8' 4 3 10 120

PCDDs/PCDFs EPAM23 1_8' 4 3 152 180

Line 2 Clinker Cooler

\ TSP. PM10• CPM EPA 201A1202 4-6 4 3 10 120 I

/

1 Three test runs were performed with Raw Mill On and three with the Raw Mill Off

2 Readings were taken every five minutes

3 CEMs samples were taken from a single point located within the centrally located 10 percent area of the stack

cross-section. Reading were collected at one-second intervals and presented as one-minute averages

using a computer based data aquisition system

Revision 0, Final

Figure

3-2

3-2

3-2

3-2

3-3

052309 '42726
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

DESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

3-3

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLING LOCATIONS (CONTINUED)

124 in. --------l..lIoolf

t

North

Gas Flow

Out of Page

Sampling Point

1

2

3

Port to Point Distance (in.)

42.7

24.1

11.4

Duct diameters upstream from flow disturbance (A):

Duct diameters downstream from flow disturbance (8):

13.3 Limit: 0.5

10.6 Limit: 2.0

Figure 3-2: Line 2 Main Kiln Stack Sampling Point Determination (EPA Method 1)

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

DESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

3-4

')

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLING LOCATIONS (CONTINUED)

r~-~~~· i02ln. -~---,--to.1

Porn

Port 3

Sampling Point

1

2

3

Port to Point Distance (in.)

30.2

14.9

4.5

Duct diameters upstream from flow disturbance (A):

Duct diameters downstream from flow disturbance (8):

3.4 Limit: 0.5

8.0 Limit: 2.0

Figure 3-3: Line 2 Clinker Cooler Sampling Point Determination (EPA Method 1)

End of Section 3 - Description of Installation

Revision 0, Final
CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

METHODOLOGY

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

4-1

Clean Air Engineering followed procedures as detailed in USEPA Methods 1,2, 3A, 4,

6C, 7E, 10 23, 25A, 26A, 29, 201A, 202 and CTM-027. The following table

summarizes the methods and their respective sources.

Table 4-1:

Summary of Sampling Procedures

Title 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A

Method 1 "Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources"

Method 2 "Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S Pitot Tube)"

Method 3A "Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions from

Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)"

Method 4 "Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases"

Method 6C "Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental

Analyzer Procedure)"

Method 7E "Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental

Analyzer Procedure)"

Method 10 "Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Stationary Sources"

Method 23 "Determination of Polychlorinated bibenzo-p-Dioxins and Polychlorinated

Dibenzofurans from Municipal Waste Conductors"

Method 25A "Determination of Total Gaseous Organic Concentration Using a Flame Ionization

Analyzer"

Method 26A "Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary Sources

Isokinetic Method"

) Method 29 "Determination of Metals Emissions from Stationary Sources"

/

Title 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix M

Method 201A "Determination of PM10 Emissions (Constant Sampling Rate Procedure)"

Method 202 "Dry Impinger Method for the Determination of Condensible Particulate Emissions from

Stationary Sources"

Conditional Test Methods (CTM)

CTM-027 "Procedure for Collection and Analysis of Ammonia in Stationary Sources"

These methods appear in detail in Title 40 ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations (CFR)

and on the World Wide Web at http://www.cleanair.com.

Diagrams ofthe sampling apparatus and major specifications ofthe sampling, recovery

and analytical procedures are summarized for each method in Appendix A.

CleanAir followed specific quality assurance and quality control (QA/Qc) procedures

as outlined in the individual methods and in USEPA "Quality Assurance Handbook for

Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III Stationary Source-Specific Methods",

EPA/600/R-94/038C. Additional QA/QC methods as prescribed in CleanAir's internal

Quality Manual were also followed. Results of all QA/QC activities performed by

CleanAir are summarized in Appendix D.

End of Section 4 - Methodology

)

Revision 0, Final
(-'I

CleanAir.

CEMEX CEMENT OF TEXAS, LP

BALCONES PLANT

APPENDIX

Client Reference No: DC04062009

CleanAir Project No: 10773

5-1

TEST METHOD SPECIFICATIONS A

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS B

PARAMETERS C

QAlQC DATA D

FIELD DATA E

FIELD DATA PRINTOUTS F

LABORATORY DATA G

PLANT DATA H

PROTOCOL 1

RESUMES J

Revision 0, Final