Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 2 / Monday, January 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules 201 

8See id. at 68947. 

9See 79 FR 2394 (Jan. 14, 2014). 

10Questions, presentation materials, and a video 

webcast have been made available at http://

www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/Events/opaevent_

aac120914. 

11See 79 FR 71973 (Dec. 4, 2014). 

The Commission published the 

Position Limits Proposal and the 

Aggregation Proposal separately because 

it believes that the proposed 

amendments regarding aggregation of 

positions could be appropriate 

regardless of whether the Position 

Limits Proposal is finalized.8 If the 

Aggregation Proposal is finalized first, 

the modifications would apply to the 

current position limits regime for 

futures and option contracts on nine 

enumerated agricultural commodities. If 

the Position Limits Proposal is 

subsequently finalized, the 

modifications in the Aggregation 

Proposal would apply to the position 

limits regime for 28 exempt and 

agricultural commodity futures and 

options contracts and the physical 

commodity swaps that are economically 

equivalent to such contracts. 

In order to provide interested parties 

with an opportunity to comment on the 

Aggregation Proposal during the 

comment period on the Position Limits 

Proposal, the Commission extended the 

comment period for the Aggregation 

Proposal to February 10, 2014, the same 

end date as the comment period for the 

Position Limits Proposal.9

Subsequent to publication of the 

Position Limits Proposal and the 

Aggregation Proposal, the Commission 

directed staff to schedule a June 19, 

2014, public roundtable to consider 

certain issues regarding position limits 

for physical commodity derivatives. The 

roundtable focused on hedges of a 

physical commodity by a commercial 

enterprise, including gross hedging, 

cross-commodity hedging, anticipatory 

hedging, and the process for obtaining a 

non-enumerated exemption. Discussion 

included the setting of spot month 

limits in physical-delivery and cashsettled contracts and a conditional spotmonth limit exemption. Further, the 

roundtable included discussion of: The 

aggregation exemption for certain 

ownership interests of greater than 50 

percent in an owned entity; and 

aggregation based on substantially 

identical trading strategies. As well, the 

Commission invited comment on 

whether to provide parity for wheat 

contracts in non-spot month limits. In 

conjunction with the roundtable, staff 

questions regarding these topics were 

posted on the Commission’s Web site. 

To provide commenters with a 

sufficient period of time to respond to 

questions raised and points made at the 

roundtable, the Commission published a 

document in the Federal Register on 

May 29, 2014, reopening the comment 

periods for the Position Limit Proposal 

and the Aggregation Proposal for three 

weeks, from June 12, 2014 to July 3, 

2014. The Commission published notice 

in the Federal Register on July 3, 2014, 

further extending the comment periods 

to August 4, 2014. 

Comment letters received on the 

Position Limits Proposal are available at 

http://comments.cftc.gov/

PublicComments/

CommentList.aspx?id=1436. Comment 

letters received on the Aggregation 

Proposal are available at http://

comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/

CommentList.aspx?id=1427. 

II. Reopening of Comment Period 

The Commission’s Agricultural 

Advisory Committee met on December 

9, 2014. The agenda adopted for the 

meeting included consideration, among 

other matters, of two issues associated 

with the Position Limits rulemaking: 

Deliverable supply and exemptions for 

bona fide hedging positions. In 

conjunction with the meeting of the 

Commission’s Agricultural Advisory 

Committee, the Commission posted 

questions and presentation materials on 

the Commission’s Web site; 

additionally, access to a video webcast 

of the meeting has been added to the 

Web site.10 To provide interested 

persons with a sufficient period of time 

to respond to questions raised and 

points made at the Agricultural 

Advisory Committee meeting, the 

Commission reopened both the Position 

Limit Proposal and the Aggregation 

Proposal for an additional 45-day 

comment period.11 The Commission is 

providing notice and clarification that, 

in addition to commenting on the 

agenda issues noted in the December 4, 

2014, Federal Register release providing 

notice of the reopened comment period, 

comments may be made on the issues 

addressed at the meeting or in 

associated materials posted to the 

Commission’s Web site, as they pertain 

to agricultural commodities, including 

hedges of a physical commodity by a 

commercial enterprise; and the process 

for estimating deliverable supplies used 

in the setting of spot month limits, as 

each pertains to agricultural 

commodities. 

Both comment periods reopened on 

December 9, 2014, and will close on 

January 22, 2015. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 

30, 2014, by the Commission. 

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, 

Secretary of the Commission. 

Note: The following appendix will not 

appear in the Code of Federal Regulations. 

Appendix to Position Limits for 

Derivatives and Aggregation of 

Positions Reopening of Comment 

Periods—Commission Voting Summary 

On this matter, Chairman Massad and 

Commissioners Wetjen, Bowen, and 

Giancarlo voted in the affirmative. No 

Commissioner voted in the negative. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30831 Filed 1–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6351–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0780; FRL–9921–27– 

Region–5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; 

Minor NSR for Title V and FESOP 

Sources 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of 

revisions to Indiana’s minor new source 

review construction permit rule. The 

rule applies to construction of new units 

or modifications of existing units at 

sources subject to title V and Federal 

enforceable state operating permit 

requirements. If approved, this rule will 

replace the previous state 

implementation plan (SIP) minor source 

construction permit rule for Indiana. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 4, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2013–0780, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: damico.genevieve@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 385–5501. 

4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air 

Permits Section, Air Programs Branch 

(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico, 

Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

202 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 2 / Monday, January 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Regional Office normal hours 

of operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. The Regional Office official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2013– 

0780. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional instructions on 

submitting comments, go to Section I of 

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

of this document. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Sam 

Portanova, Environmental Engineer, at 

(312) 886–3189 before visiting the 

Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sam 

Portanova, Environmental Engineer, Air 

Permits Section, Air Programs Branch 

(AR–18J), Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, 

(312) 886–3189, portanova.sam@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What should I consider as I prepare my 

comments for EPA? 

II. What is being addressed in this document? 

III. What are the changes that EPA is 

approving? 

IV. What action is EPA taking? 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews. 

I. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

When submitting comments, 

remember to: 

1. Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

2. Follow directions—EPA may ask 

you to respond to specific questions or 

organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

3. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

4. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

5. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

6. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

7. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

8. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

On November 7, 2013, the Indiana 

Department of Environmental 

Management (IDEM) submitted a SIP 

revision request to EPA for minor new 

source review (NSR) construction 

permit rules. EPA last approved 

Indiana’s minor construction permit 

rules (326 IAC 2–1) on October 7, 1994 

(59 FR 51108). In this action, EPA is 

approving amendments to 326 IAC 2–7– 

10.5(a), (c) through (j), (l), and (m), and 

to 326 IAC 2–8–11.1 as revisions to 

Indiana’s SIP. These provisions do not 

apply to permitting actions that trigger 

major prevention of significant 

deterioration (PSD) or nonattainment 

NSR requirements. 326 IAC 2–7–10.5 

and 326 IAC 2–8–11.1 replace 326 IAC 

2–1, which has been repealed in the 

state rules, as the minor NSR 

construction permit rules in the Indiana 

SIP. 

III. What are the changes that EPA is 

approving? 

326 IAC 2–7–10.5 is Indiana’s minor 

source construction permit rule for 

sources that are subject to the title V 

operating permit program. 326 IAC 2–8– 

11.1 is Indiana’s minor source 

construction permit rule for sources that 

are subject to the Federally enforceable 

state operating permit (FESOP) program. 

The requirements and emission 

thresholds under these two rules are 

essentially the same and we are 

providing one summary below that 

covers both rules. These rules apply to 

permitting actions that are not subject to 

PSD or nonattainment NSR. Any permit 

modification that exceeds the PSD or 

nonattainment NSR thresholds in 326 

IAC 2–2 and 326 IAC 2–3 continues to 

be subject to the requirements of those 

rules. 

Pursuant to 326 IAC 2–7–10.5(e) or 

326 IAC 2–8–11.1(d), a permitting 

action is subject to the minor 

modification requirements of this rule if 

it has a potential to emit (PTE) greater 

than or equal to the following: 5 tons 

per year (tpy) of particulate matter (PM), 

PM less than 10 microns in size (PM10), 

PM less than 2.5 microns in size (PM2.5), 

hydrogen sulfide (H2S), total reduced 

sulfur (TRS), reduced sulfur 

compounds, or fluorides; 10 tpy of 

sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide 

(NOX), or volatile organic compounds 

(VOC); 25 tpy of carbon monoxide (CO); 

or 0.2 tpy of lead. For VOC emissions, 

the minor modification requirements 

apply if the PTE is greater than or equal 

to 5 tpy for modifications that require 

the use of air pollution control 

equipment to comply with the 

provisions of 326 IAC 8. 

For permitting actions that meet the 

criteria for minor modification under 

this rule, the source is required to 

submit a permit application to IDEM 

pursuant to 326 IAC 2–7–10.5(d) or 326 

IAC 2–8–11.1 (c). Pursuant to 326 IAC 

2–7–10.5(f) or 326 IAC 2–8–11.1(e), 

within 45 days of receipt of the 

application, IDEM shall approve the 

request, deny the request, determine 

that the request would cause or 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 2 / Monday, January 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules 203 

1 326 IAC 2–4.1 is IDEM’s regulation 

implementing the requirements of Section 112(g) of 

the Clean Air Act for sources with hazardous air 

pollutant (HAP) emissions above 10 tpy for a single 

HAP or 25 tpy for a combination of HAPs. 

contribute to a violation of a national 

ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) 

or a PSD increment standard, or 

determine that the request is subject to 

the significant modification provisions 

of this rule. 

Pursuant to 326 IAC 2–7–10.5(g) or 

326 IAC 2–8–11.1(f)(1), a permitting 

actions is subject to the significant 

modification requirements if it has a 

PTE greater than or equal to 100 tpy of 

CO or 25 tpy of PM, PM10, PM2.5, SO2, 

NOX, VOC, H2S, TRS, reduced sulfur 

compounds, or fluorides. For lead, the 

significant modification requirements 

apply for any modification with a PTE 

greater than or equal to 1 tpy. If the 

entire source has a lead PTE of greater 

than or equal to 5 tpy, the significant 

modification requirements apply for a 

modification with a lead PTE greater 

than 0.6 tpy. 

In addition to the requirements for a 

minor modification, 326 IAC 2–7– 

10.5(h) and 326 IAC 2–8–11.1(f)(2) 

require a permitting action that meets 

the criteria for a significant modification 

under this rule to go through public 

notice prior to permit issuance pursuant 

to 326 IAC 2–1.1–6 (which EPA 

approved into Indiana’s SIP on March 3, 

2003 (68 FR 9892)). Public notice 

requirements for significant permit 

revisions under 326 IAC 2–8–11.1 are 

conducted pursuant to 326 IAC 2–8–13 

(which EPA approved into Indiana’s SIP 

on August 18, 1995 (60 FR 43008)). This 

satisfies the public notice requirements 

for minor construction permits in 40 

CFR 51.161. 

The significant modification emission 

thresholds for pollutants other than CO 

are the same as those contained in 

Indiana’s existing SIP-approved minor 

NSR rules. The 100 tpy CO emission 

threshold for significant modifications, 

however, is less stringent than the 25 

tpy applicability threshold in the 

existing SIP-approved Indiana minor 

NSR rules. IDEM included an analysis 

in the November 7, 2013, SIP submittal 

to EPA demonstrating that the 100 tpy 

threshold is protective of the CO 

NAAQS. In the analysis, IDEM reviewed 

CO point source emissions and ambient 

air monitoring data from 2000 through 

2012. IDEM selected recent PSD sources 

for modeling at 100 tpy with the 

modeled results compared to the 1-hour 

and 8-hour CO significant impact levels 

(SILs). The modeling results showed no 

exceedances of either the 1-hour or 8- 

hour CO SILs. Existing CO monitors in 

Indiana show ambient values well 

below the NAAQS. As a result, IDEM 

has shown that ambient air quality will 

remain well below the NAAQS, even 

with the addition of sources that emit 

CO at 100 tpy. Indiana’s analysis of the 

CO threshold satisfies 40 CFR 51.160(e), 

which requires states to identify sources 

that will be subject to minor 

construction permit provisions and 

discuss the basis for determining which 

sources will be subject to review. EPA 

proposes approval of the minor and 

significant modification thresholds in 

326 IAC 2–7–10.5 and 326 IAC 2–8– 

11.1. 

326 IAC 2–7–10.5(c) and 326 IAC 2– 

8–11.1(b) allow sources to repair or 

replace an emission unit or air pollution 

control equipment without prior 

approval. To qualify for this provision, 

a modification must meet the following 

criteria: (1) The PTE of each regulated 

pollutant after the modification is less 

than or equal to the PTE of the unit that 

was repaired or replaced; (2) the 

modification is not major under 326 IAC 

2–2, 326 IAC 2–3, or 326 IAC 2–4.1; 1

and (3) the modification returns the unit 

to normal operation after an upset, 

malfunction, or mechanical failure or 

prevents impeding and imminent failure 

of the unit. Item 2 above means any 

action that would trigger major PSD, 

nonattainment NSR, or hazardous 

pollutant requirements under Section 

112(g) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) is not 

eligible for this provision. Since sources 

must meet all three of the criteria listed 

above in order to qualify for the repair 

or replacement provision, EPA believes 

that these criteria sufficiently narrow 

the universe of modifications that are 

eligible. EPA proposes approval of 326 

IAC 2–7–10.5(c) and 326 IAC 2–8– 

11.1(b). 

326 IAC 2–7–10.5(b) and (k) address 

provisions for incorporating terms from 

Federal consent decrees and Federal 

district court orders into construction 

permits. EPA previously approved these 

portions of 326 IAC 2–7–10.5 into 

Indiana’s SIP on January 17, 2014 (79 

FR 3120). 

IV. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is proposing to approve Indiana’s 

minor source construction permit rule 

in 326 IAC 2–7–10.5(a), (c) through (j), 

(l), and (m), and 326 IAC 2–8–11.1. EPA 

has determined that the emission 

thresholds and permitting requirements 

discussed above satisfy the 

requirements of 40 CFR 51.160 and 

51.161. EPA is not proposing action on 

326 IAC 2–7–10.5(b) and (k) because 

these portions of the state’s rule have 

already been approved into Indiana’s 

SIP. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

204 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 2 / Monday, January 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: December 22, 2014. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30832 Filed 1–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

46 CFR Part 105 

Docket No. USCG–2014–0195] 

RIN 1625–AC18 

Commercial Fishing Vessels 

Dispensing Petroleum Products 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking: 

notice of reopening of comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is reopening 

the public comment period on the 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

entitled ‘‘Commercial Fishing Vessels 

Dispensing Petroleum Products,’’ 

published in the Federal Register on 

August 20, 2014. The notice of proposed 

rulemaking included an incorrect 

docket number, USCG–2013–0195, and 

has been reopened with the correct 

docket number, USCG–2014–0195, to 

facilitate public comment. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be submitted online via http://

www.regulations.gov, or reach the 

Docket Management Facility, on or 

before February 4, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2014–0195 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice, call 

or email Jack Kemerer, Fishing Vessel 

Safety Division (CG–CVC–3), Office of 

Commercial Vessel Compliance (CVC), 

U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 202–372– 

1249, email Jack.A.Kemerer@uscg.mil. If 

you have questions on viewing or 

submitting material to the docket, call 

Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to submit 

comments and related material on the 

notice of proposed rulemaking. All 

comments received will be posted, 

without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting comments: If you submit a 

comment, please include the docket 

number for this notice (USCG–2014– 

0195) and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online, or by fax, mail or hand 

delivery, but please use only one of 

these means. We recommend that you 

include your name and a mailing 

address, an email address, or a 

telephone number in the body of your 

document so that we can contact you if 

we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2014–0195’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change this proposed rule based on your 

comments. 

B. Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this notice as 

being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2014– 

0195’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. If you do not have access to the 

internet, you may view the docket 

online by visiting the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

C. Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act, system of records notice regarding 

our public dockets in the January 17, 

2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 

FR 3316). 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS