alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007047EN.01000101.xml

| 1.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 47/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | — |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 712/06 |
| Member State | Slovakia |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Pomoc pre LOAR, s.r.o., v prospech periodika „ÚJ NŐ“ |
| Legal basis | a) | Zákon č. 523/2004 Z. z. o rozpočtových pravidlách verejnej správy a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov, |

Date of adoption of the decision

—

Reference number of the aid

N 712/06

Member State

Slovakia

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Pomoc pre LOAR, s.r.o., v prospech periodika „ÚJ NŐ“

Legal basis

a)

Zákon č. 523/2004 Z. z. o rozpočtových pravidlách verejnej správy a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov,

| b) | Zákon č. 231/1999 Z. z. o štátnej pomoci v znení zákona č. 203/2004 – § 4 ods. 1, písm. d), |
| --- | --- |

b)

Zákon č. 231/1999 Z. z. o štátnej pomoci v znení zákona č. 203/2004 – § 4 ods. 1, písm. d),

| c) | Výnos Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky č. MK – 2165/2006-110/6075, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa výnos MK SR č. MK-12947/05-110/30493 o poskytovaní dotácií v pôsobnosti Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky |
| --- | --- |

c)

Výnos Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky č. MK – 2165/2006-110/6075, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa výnos MK SR č. MK-12947/05-110/30493 o poskytovaní dotácií v pôsobnosti Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Culture

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: SKK 1,65 million; Overall budget: —

Intensity

18 %

Duration

1.1.2006-31.12.2006

Economic sectors

Media

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministerstvo kultúry SR, Nám. SNP 33, SK-813 31 Bratislava, Slovenská republika

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
No. 59045.

protest 225661-K (A) (New York).

#### E. Fomil & Sons and Excel Shipping Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
#### STEWART M. HUTT, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. NORMAN ROBBINS, *ET ALS.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

See same case below: 98 *N. J. Super.*99.

*Messrs. Suit & Berlcow*and *Mr. Sam Weiss*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Norman Robbins*and *Mr. Isadore Rosenblum*for the respondents.

January 29, 1968.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

JERMAINE TERRELL MILLER, 

AGGRIEVED PARTY, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, 39TH 

DISTRICT-FRANKLIN, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 155 MM 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2014, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
April 22, 1963

Reap. Dec. 10499.

#### Joseph Tanous *v.*United States,

REHEARING MOTION DENIED

Entered at Laredo, Tex. Reap. Dec. 10439. Motion by plaintiff.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, JOSEPH BATTY, certify,  pursuant to Rule 13a-4 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
with respect to the Annual Report of 1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.  (formerly  Pultronex
Corporation) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31, 2005 ("Report") that:

(1) I have reviewed this Report;

(2) based on my knowledge,  this Report does not contain any untrue statement of
a  material  fact  or omit  to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

(3)  based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements  and  other  financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of 1-900 Jackpot, Inc.
(formerly  Pultronex  Corporation) as of, and for the periods  presented in this
Report;

(4) I am responsible for  establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and  15d-14)  for 1-900
Jackpot,  Inc.  (formerly  Pultronex  Corporation) and I have: (a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material  information relating
to 1-900 Jackpot,  Inc. (formerly Pultronex  Corporation) is made known to me by
others,  particularly  during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
(b) evaluated the  effectiveness  of 1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.  (formerly  Pultronex
Corporation)'s  disclosure  controls and  procedures as of a date within 90 days
prior  to the  filing  date of this  Report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and (c)
presented  in  this  Report  my  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of  the
disclosure  controls and procedures  based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

(5) I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation,  to our auditors and
the audit  committee  of our  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent  function):  (a)  all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or
operation  of  internal  controls  which could  adversely  affect our ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for our
auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and (b) any fraud,
whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in our internal controls; and




DATE:   NOVEMBER 22, 2005

BY:      /S/ JOSEPH BATTY
      ---------------------------
             JOSEPH BATTY
    PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2017 (the “Report”) of TICC Capital
Corp. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce L. Rubin, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant. /s/ Bruce L. RubinName:

Bruce
L. RubinDate:

November 2, 2017
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Distributed Energy Systems Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ambrose L. Schwallie, principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:    May 10, 2007



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|                                                
|/s/    Ambrose L. Schwallie                     
|Ambrose L. Schwallie Principal executive
officer
No. 76-129.

#### Levy *v.*United States.

Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.
No. 41850.

#### Protests 922089-G, etc., of Greenberg & Josefsberg (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 39029 the thumb tacks in question were held dutiable under paragraph 331 as claimed.
October 9, 1975 

The Honorable Richard W. Carter 

Office of the County Attorney 

Hunt County 

Third Floor, Courthouse Building 

Greenville, Texas 75401 

Dear Mr. Carter: 

Opinion No. H- 713 

Re: Validity of oaths administered 

by notaries who are between the ages 

of eighteen and twenty-one. 

You ask whether oaths administered by notaries public eighteen years 

of age or older but under the age,of tw~enty-one are valid if they were administered 

between August 27, 1973 and June 19, 19751 

Until recently the language of article 5949 provided that a notary public was 

required to be at least twenty-one ~years of age. Se;;a5”;Ae*;t,* ;J;;; ,4-8ttih,;eg. r 

ch. 309, p. 459 (codified as V. T.C.S. art. 5949). 

5949 was amended to expressly provide that a person need be only eighteen years 

of age to be appointed a notary public. Previously, however, on August 27, 1973, 

article 5923b, V. T. C. S., had become effective. It provides in part: 

Section 1. The purpose of this Act is to extend all 

the rights, privileges, and obligations bf majority to 

all persons who are at least 18 years of age. It shall 

be construed liberally to accomplish that purpose. 

Section 2. Notwithstanding any statutory & decisional 

law, or any rule, regulation, or ordinance of this state or 

of any political subdivision or incorporated city or town of 

this state, a person who is at least 18 years of age has the 

rights, privileges, and obligations of a person who is 21 

years of age. A law, rule, regulation, or ordinance which 

extends a right, privilege, or obligation to a person on the 

basis of a minimum age of 21, 20, or 19 years shall be interpreted as prescribing a minimum age of 18 years. . . . . 

The issue is whether this statute effectively lowered the qualifying age for 

notaries public from twenty-one to eighteen as of August 27, 1973. We have 

previously said that the clear language of that article indicates that any law extending a right, privilege or obligation to a person on the basis of a minimum 

p. 3066 
The Honorable Richard W. Carter - page 2 (H-713) 

age of twenty-one is to be interpreted as prescribing a minimum age of eighteen. 

Attorney General Opinions H-687(1975); H-301(1974); H-82(1973). Accordingly, 

it is our opinion that beginning August 27, 1973, a person who was efghteen years 

of age could be appointed as a notary public and that any oaths he might administer 

would not be subject to challenge on the basis of his age. And see Freeman v. 

Port Arthur Rice and Irrigation Co., 188 S. W. 444 (Tex. civ. App. --Beaumont 

1916, no writ) which indicated that an affidavit was not defective because the 

notary before whom it was administered was under twenty-one years of age. 

SUMMARY 

Beginning August 27, 1973, persons who 

were at least eighteen years of age were eligible 

for appointment as a notary public. 

ery truly yours, 

F% 

L. HILL 

orney General of Texas 

Opinion Committee 

jad: 

p. 3067
No. 64953.

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N.Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/3295 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 82 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government 

pension offset and windfall elimination provisions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana (for himself, Ms. SPANBERGER, Mr. COMER, Mr. 

GARAMENDI, Ms. LETLOW, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, and Ms. 

BROWNLEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the 

Government pension offset and windfall elimination provisions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Fair5 ness Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 82 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF GOVERNMENT PENSION OFFSET PROVI2 SION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 202(k) of the Social Secu4 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 402(k)) is amended by striking para5 graph (5). 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

7 (1) Section 202(b)(2) of the Social Security Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 402(b)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘sub9 sections (k)(5) and (q)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 

10 (q)’’. 

11 (2) Section 202(c)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 402(c)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘subsections 

13 (k)(5) and (q)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (q)’’. 

14 (3) Section 202(e)(2)(A) of such Act (42 

15 U.S.C. 402(e)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘sub16 section (k)(5), subsection (q),’’ and inserting ‘‘sub17 section (q)’’. 

18 (4) Section 202(f)(2)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

19 402(f)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘subsection 

20 (k)(5), subsection (q)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 

21 (q)’’. 

22 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF WINDFALL ELIMINATION PROVISIONS. 

23 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 215 of the Social Security 

24 Act (42 U.S.C. 415) is amended— 

25 (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (7); 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 82 IH

1 (2) in subsection (d), by striking paragraph (3); 

2 and 

3 (3) in subsection (f), by striking paragraph (9). 

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Subsections (e)(2) 

5 and (f)(2) of section 202 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402) are 

6 each amended by striking ‘‘section 215(f)(5), 215(f)(6), 

7 or 215(f)(9)(B)’’ in subparagraphs (C) and (D)(i) and in8 serting ‘‘paragraph (5) or (6) of section 215(f)’’. 

9 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

11 respect to monthly insurance benefits payable under title 

12 II of the Social Security Act for months after December 

13 2023. Notwithstanding section 215(f) of the Social Secu14 rity Act, the Commissioner of Social Security shall adjust 

15 primary insurance amounts to the extent necessary to take 

16 into account the amendments made by section 3. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Before the Second Division,

January 25, 1943

No. 47949.

#### Protests 887926-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain df the hats in question are similar to those the subject of Abstract 47291 the protests were sustained as to those items.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-79,901-02

EX P ARTE KEITH REYNOLDS, Ap plicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 20090D02381 IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 F ROM EL P ASO COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 4 1 8 S
. W
. 2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of manufa cture or delivery of a controlled substance and one count of possession of marijuana , and was sentenc ed to sevente en year s’ imprisonment for the manufa cture or delivery count and three year s’ imprisonment for the possession of marijuana count, to run c oncurr ently
. Applicant contends that he was d e n ie d his right to appeal beca use he was err oneously advised that he had no right of appea l afte r entering into an agree ment at th e sentenc ing stag e of trial. Applicant alleg es that upon further investiga tion it was discovere d that he d i d not knowing ly and2

voluntarily

waive his right to appeal f rom the jury ’s ver dict. The trial court has deter

mined that Applicant was denied his right to appeal this conviction, and that he de sire to pursue a n appea l. We find that Applicant is e ntitled to the opportunity to file
an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No. 20090D02381 from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of El Paso County
. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notic e o f ap p ea l so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaning ful appea l. Wit hin ten d ay s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calculated as if the s entenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of t h i s Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative steps to file a wr i tten notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s afte r the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion s h all be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 8, 2014 Do not publish
EXHIBIT  32.1  &  32.2

      STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Diamond Powersports, Inc.
(the  "Company")  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pierre
Elliott,  Chief  Executive Officer, and Lisa Elliott, Secretary and Treasurer of
the  Company,  certify  that:

*    the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

*    information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/  Pierre  Elliott
--------------------
Pierre  Elliott
Director,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer

April  14,  2004

/s/  Lisa  Elliott
------------------
Lisa  Elliott
Director  and  Secretary  and  Treasurer

April  14,  2004


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of
Section  18  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.
No. 51058.

#### Protests 49624-K, etc., of Maddock & Miller, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of oat-meals or oatmeal saucers and puree cups or chowder cups the same in all material' respects as those passed upon in *Copeland & Thompson, Inc.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833) and *Johnson Bros.*v. *United States*(15 id. 113, C. D. 955). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                |                                                                |                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                                | DIAMOND                POWERSPORTS, INC.(Registrant)                |
|                                                           |                                                           |                              |
| Date: February                17, 2005     | By:                                                       | /s/ Pierre                Elliott |
|                                                                | Pierre                ElliottChief                Executive Officer |