alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 6

CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

I, Omar Gomez, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd. (the issuer);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

1.

The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 29,2006

/s/ Omar Gomez

Omar Gomez
Chief Financial Officer
#### William A. Coleman, *Respondent, v.*Annie B. Phelps, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed. Opinion *Per Curiam.*
No. 64952.

#### World Wide Services, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/3271 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
#### In the Matter of Motors Insurance Corporation, Appellant. Ronald Lewis, Respondent.

[634 NYS2d 408]

—Motion by the respondent on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 9, 1994, to strike stated portions of the appellant’s brief on the ground that those portions contain matter dehors the record. By decision and order dated June 16, 1995, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the bench hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.

Upon the papers submitted in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied.

The portions of appellant’s brief at issue were "the papers and exhibits upon which the * * * order [appealed from] was founded”, and therefore were properly before the court (CPLR 5526). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
(Reap. Dec. 8559)

#### Irving Lehat *v.*United States

Entry No. 711961.

(Decided March 9, 1956)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When this case was called for hearing, the record indicates that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff and the case was submitted “subject to a motion for judgment by defendant.”

In conformity with the requirements of the statute (28 U. S. C. *547§ 2631), I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment for defendant will be entered accordingly.
No. 50522.

#### Protest 49334-K of Kaufmann Dept. Stores (Pittsburgh).

*277Opinion, by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court, found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust, Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at nooD on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Exhibit
31.2





Certification
Pursuant to Section 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Paul C.
Schmidt (UpSNAP Chief Financial Officer)





I, Paul
C. Schmidt, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended march 31, 2008 of
UpSNAP, Inc. (“registrant”);





2.           Based
on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and board of directors:
:





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information (all of which do not apply); and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls (all of which do
not apply).





Date: May
14, 2008





/s/ Paul C.
Schmidt


Paul C.
Schmidt


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of Anonymous, a Tenured Teacher Employed by the Mexico Central School District, Appellant, v Board of Education for the Mexico Central School District, Respondent.

[635 NYS2d 562]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Hurlbutt, J. *(see also, Matter of LaRocca v Board of Educ.,*220 AD2d 424). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hurlbutt, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Wesley, Balio, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 No. 333-128311) pertaining to the NDS 1999 Executive Share Option Scheme,
      the NDS UK Approved Share Option Scheme and the NDS Group plc Sharesave Scheme
      of our reports dated August 31, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial
      statements of NDS Group plc, NDS Group plc management’s assessment of the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of NDS Group plc,
      included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30,
      2006.





/s/
      ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Ernst
      & Young LLP





London,
      England


August
      31, 2006








E-3
# •CHniKTmA n SINC E 189 4 

## ••-•^^iOP fRATION S ^^(/^E C I S P j : I T Februat 7 9 . 201 2 Docke tManagemen t Facilit y U.S . Departmen to fTransportation . 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e SE. , Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor . Roo m W12-140 . _Wa^ngp_n , D C 20590 . Re : Su n Countr ySlo tExemptio n - Docke tNumbe rFAA-2012-008 9 Ladie s an d Gentlemen : Su n Countr yAirline s ha s requeste d a n exemptio n fro m th e slo t limi t fo rRonal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airpor t (OCA ) se tfort h i n § 93.123(a) , t o permi t th e FA At o creat e ai rcarrie rslot s durin g certai n limite d hour s fo rSu n Country' s use . Th e propose d ai rcarrie rslot s woul d replac e tw o slo t exemption s unde rDO TOrde r2010-12-1 6 awarde d t o Su n Country . O n Januar y6 , 2012 , th e Unite d State s Cour t o fAppeal s fo rth e Distric to fColumbi a Circui t vacate d th e DO TOrder , an d Su n Countr y wil l los e it s existin g servic e betwee n DC Aan d Lansing' s Capita l Regio n Internationa l Airport . Specifically , Su n Countr ydesire s on e dail yslo t durin g eac h o fth e 100 0 an d I 10 0 hours . Th e propose d exemptio n woul d permi t Su n Countr yt o continu e operatin g it s existin g service s an d avoi d a n inequitabl e resul t o fth e Court' s order . Th e Su n Countr yDC Aservic e i s essentia l t o th e economi cgrowt h o fth e Greate rLansin g Region . Th e dail yservic e i s th e onl ylarg e aircraf t(737-800 ) servic e t o Washingto n Reaga n Airport , i n th e stat e o f Michiga n outsid e o fDetroi tPrio rt o Su n Country , th e regiona l communit yha d requeste d th e introductio n o fthi s servic e fro m numerou s othe rairlin e operator s withou t success . Accordingly , i t i s critica l tha tth e FA Atak e th e necessar ystep s t o ensur e th e continuatio n o fth e Su n Countr yslot s a t th e establishe d fligh t time s i n suppor to fGreate rLansing' s busines s an d economi cgrowth . 'YoTi rimmediat e approval'o fthi s exemption ^ s o tha tSu n Countr yca n begin'to'ente rflight s schedulesfo r sal e fo rth e balanc e o f2012 , wil l b e greatl yappreciated . Sincerely , T h e Christma n Compan y 

# (hi^u ^ Steve n F . Roznowsk i Chie fExecutive-Office r

Th e Chniimj n Compan yTh e Chriitm.5 n Buildin g 20 8 N . Capilo l Avcnij e Linsing . Michiga n 48933- 1 3^ 7
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **EXCHANGE
        ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
  In
        connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of UpSnap, Inc. (the
        ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB/a for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        Paul Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
        of my
        knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  i.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  ii.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to UpSnap, Inc and will be retained by
        UpSnap,
        Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon
        request.
  
 By: 
        /s/ Paul Schmidt
  Name:
        Paul Schmidt
 Title:
        Chief Financial Officer
 Date:
        October 3, 2007
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIANWANG FENG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71959

Agency No. A099-071-154

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 14, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges. 

Lianwang Feng, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

OCT 20 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations

created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.

2010), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on the inconsistencies within Feng’s testimony and between his testimony

and other record evidence regarding his alleged mistreatment by police, and his

wife’s residence in China after the Chinese government’s alleged taking of their

property. See id. at 1045-48 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable

under the REAL ID Act’s “totality of the circumstances” standard). The agency

reasonably rejected Feng’s explanations for the inconsistencies. See Rivera v.

Mukasey, 508 F.3d 1271, 1275 (9th Cir. 2007). In the absence of credible

testimony, Feng’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v.

Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, because Feng’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony found to

be not credible, and he does not point to any other evidence that shows it is more

likely than not he would be tortured if returned to China, his CAT claim also fails.

See id. at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 12-71959
Order filed April 17 , 2020

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00282

- CV

____________ IN RE CELINA JEAN HA RP , Relator

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 345th District Court Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D

- 1

- AG

- 15

- 002375



### ORDER
On April 15, 2020, relator Celina Jean Harp, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an appendix in this court. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 prohibits the filing of documents containing sensitive data, in cluding a birth date, home address, and the name of any person who was a minor when the underlying2 suit was filed. See Tex. R. App. 9.9. Relator’s appendix discloses prohibited sensitive data. See reporter’s record and exhibits in the appendix.

We strike relator’s petition and appendix and ORDER relator to file an amended petition and appendix, with any sensitive data redacted, that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 by April 22 , 2020 . All future filings by any party must comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 or are subject to being stricken.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Wise , Jewell and Poissant.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v CHARLES PEARSON, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

17 USCMA 204, 37 CMR 468

No. 20,208

August 11, 1967

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent, Major David J. Passamaneck,*and *Captain Gerald F. Rickman*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel David Rarick*and *Captain Salvatore A. Romano*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Two statements of the accused were received in evidence after proof that he was advised of his rights under Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 31, 10 USC § 831, and that he was entitled either to “legal assistance” from the staff judge advocate’s office or to representation by civilian counsel at his own expense. The interrogating investigator did not inform the accused that a “military lawyer would be provided free of charge,” nor did he tell him that counsel might be present during the interrogation. In short, the warning as to accused’s counsel was wholly inadequate, and it was prejudicial error to receive the statements. United States v Tempia, 16 USCMA 629, 37 CMR 249; Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 16 L ed 2d 694, 86 S Ct 1602 (1966).

The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing may be ordered, or the board may, pursuant to accused’s plea, affirm findings of guilty of wrongful appropriation and reassess the sentence.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00155-CV

BRANDY LEIGH MOORE,

Appellant

v.

JAY CHRISTOPHER MOORE,

Appellee

From the 18th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-D201600897

O R D E R

This appeal was referred to mediation on June 14, 2017. Appellant notified the 

Court on October 20, 2017 that the parties did not reach a settlement. 

Accordingly, the suspension of the appeal is lifted. Appellant’s brief is due 30 

days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
Moore v. Moore Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Suspension lifted

Order issued and filed October 25, 2017
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton
Series.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                             
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                               
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                    
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 11, 2010