alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED MAY 4,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ^^^^'^ OFJRA: !>^CRWION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ' 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

WEBCO Aircraft Company 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09CE0001 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0839 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

AND 

AMENDING PROCEDURAL ORDER 

Respondent has filed a motion for continuance setting forth there is a companion 

case before the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) concerning related issues 

between the parties. Respondent has also averred the outcome of the NTSB case may 

influence the parties' view of this case which may eliminate the need for a trial in this 

matter. 

Complainant has not responded. 

WHEREUPON, the within filed motion having been read and considered it be 

and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

1. This matter is continued from the hearing dates of June 2 and 3, 2010; 

2. This matter will be reset for hearing in January 2011, if necessary; 

3. Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

... On or before December 31, 2010, the parties shall conclude all 

discovery including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, 

responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties 

cannot resolve a discovery dispnte^hey shall submit the dispute to the 

undersigned for resolutumin a tin0fy) 

Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09CE0001 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Robert Weber, President 

Webco Aircraft Company, Respondent 

1134 N.Oliver Road 

Newton, KS 67114-9446 

Edward A. McConwell, Respondent's Counsel 

McConwell Law Offices 

5925 Beverly 

Mission, KS 66202 

TEL: 913-262-0605 

FAX: 913-262-0652 

David Kessler, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ACE-7, Central Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

DOT Building, 901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3763 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor: 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant: 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use tlie following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Windley, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 10]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), rendered April 21, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to permit a 911 telephone operator to testify regarding a prior inconsistent statement made by the complainant as to the defendant’s height. While the complainant initially described the defendant as being six feet tall, he subsequently indicated that the defendant was approximately five feet eight inches tall. The initial description of the defendant as being six feet tall was given to a police officer as well as to the 911 telephone operator. That officer testified about the initial description and the complainant was cross-examined about the variance in his descriptions. Under the circumstances, where the inconsistency was placed before the jury, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in precluding the testimony of the operator *(see, People v Piazza,*48 NY2d 151,164-165; *People v Hayes,*191 AD2d 368, 370; *People v Drake,*141 AD2d 560, 561). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 2, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00547

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.S.P., A Child,

From the County Court at Law, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 07

- 06

- 4710

- CCL

Honorable Vivian Torres, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellee ’ s brief is due on March 9, 2015.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Before the Third Division,

January 9, 1942

No. 46800.

#### Protest 63788-K of Rice & Co. Corp. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the warehouse entry originally covered five cases of second-hand razor blade wrapping machines. Later three of these cases were extracted from the warehouse entry and entered by substitution on six months’ bond entry. In liquidating, this fact was overlooked and duties were assessed on the five cases. From the stipulation of counsel it was found that the liquidation was in error and that the warehouse entry in question should have been liquidated to cover two cases only, resulting in customs duties of $610.23. It was held that all duties in excess of that amount should be refunded.
#### In the Matter of Anthony M. Garra way, Appellant, v New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 428]

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ellison, J.), entered March 31, 1995 in Chemung County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent revoking petitioner’s parole.

Petitioner was charged with four violations of the conditions of his parole and was found guilty of three of those charges after a hearing. As a result, his parole was revoked. Petitioner *793claims that his due process rights were violated because he was not apprised of the allegations contained in the fourth charge and that there is not substantial evidence in the record to support the finding of guilt on this charge. We disagree. The fourth charge alleged that petitioner threatened to kill Daryl Matthews. We find that petitioner received notice of this charge and that the allegations contained therein were sufficiently specific to advise petitioner of the condition of parole which was violated. Moreover, we find that the transcript of the 911 calls, as well as the testimony of Matthews and the police officers who responded to the calls, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6574

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TION KIMBROUGH , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:09

- cr
- 00220

- REP

- 1 )

Submitted : September 18, 2018 Decided: October 15, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judge s
.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Tion Kimbrough, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tion Kimbrough appeals the district court’s order den ying his motion for
reduction of sentence

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kimbrough , No. 3:09

- cr
- 00220

- REP

- 1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2018) . We d ispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Catharine M. Raymond *v.*Hiram Nott and Joseph R. Husson.

Judgment and order overruling. defendant’s answer affirmed, . with costs. Opinion by Barnard, P. J.
#### Taormina, Appellant, *v.*Catanese.

Argued April 30, 1969.

May 28, 1969:

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*A. Benjamin Scvrica,*for appellant.

*Bernard V. DiGiacomo,*with him *Fox, Differ & DiGiacomo,*for appellee.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Decree affirmed.
(Reap. Dec. 9529)

#### Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 2914; 3075; 2851.

(Decided November 2, 1959)

*Wallace & Schwartz*for tbe plaintiff.

*George Cochran Dowd,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals to reappraisement have been submitted for decision, without introducing any evidence.

There is nothing in the record before the court to overcome the presumption of correctness that attaches to the appraiser’s action with respect to the value found for appraisement.

I, therefore, find and hold that the value of the merchandise herein is the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 50135.

#### Protests 93660-K, etc., of Hurley Johnson Corp. (New York).

*240Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the records in *Stein*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 443, C. D. 511) and Abstract 49359 were admitted in evidence and made a part of the record herein. Plaintiff’s witness, when shown the sample of a Tam O’Shanter octagon block, a part of the record in Abstract 49359, testified that the stones his company imports are identical, except for size, and that Tam O’Shanter rectangular polishing blocks also are the same, except for size and shape; that such rectangular polishing blocks of the 12 to 20 pounds selection include quite a range of sizes and as'an estimate at least 20 percent of such items would be 8 inches or less in each dimension; and that the octagon stones on the invoice described as measuring 8 inches would not include any stones measuring greater than that dimension. In view of the uncontradicted testimony and following the cases cited it was held that the Tam O’Shanter octagon polishing blocks measuring 6" by 7" by 4", or 8" by 4", and 20 percent 'of each item of the Tam O’Shanter rectangular polishing blocks, 12 to 20 pounds, established as measuring 8 inches or less, were entitled to free entry under paragraph 1692, as claimed. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 65582.

#### L. Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 156151-K, 178133-K, and 178134-K (New York).

*464Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of candlesticks and candelabras similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, except that they are not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer, the claim at 22% percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for other metal articles, not specially provided for, was sustained. The items marked “C,” stipulated to be the same as those involved in said Abstract 62036, were held dutiable at 25 percent under the provision in said paragraph 397, as modified, *supra,*for articles, not specially provided for, plated with silver on nickel silver or copper, but not in chief value of silver, as claimed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1962

BEATRICE DOWNS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. TERRY MCAULIFFE, Governor of Virginia , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:17

- cv
- 00760

- REP )

Submitted : February 19, 2019 Decided: February 26, 2019

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Beatrice Downs, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Kenneth Page, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opin ions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Beatrice Downs appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted

. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversi ble error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis , we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Downs v. McAuliff e , No. 3:17

- cv
- 00760

- REP (E.D. Va. July 27, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts an d legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
^i?;tCf:': fpp'swV °"^*=fe ««a»+;oo

W ""*>**«-03

William (Wwi &;\fioa

^3-i5

T~^

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUS 122315

IF j) /•
Petitioner'srprintedname; ilO\V\\c\Y^ tDflfV. Q>hSo{}

State bar number, ifapplicabie: A/A

Address: \) l! bafri ocj ±of) R.d

-~~ D^rrrAg^n Un?T ,

Telephone: /V H

Fax: N'A ....

INiVIAfE?S PEiCLARATOJN^

I, yUjijLL&YA ^TfJOuuL Jj.<ULj0y1s , am the4r^licMt:^etilro^^(:circle one) and

being presently incMcerated,in"\",f),(\3 -~LA.Qorr^W) Lt/irj:declare under penalty of

perjury that, according to my belief; the facts stated in the above application are true and-correet.

•Signed on- S".,SW ,?20; X5~<,

SigpatureiofApplicaht /^tftion^r (circlesonej

17

Rey. 0:1/14/4.4-
PETITIONEES INFORMATION

Petitioner's^printed name: W\U\GVYv tyVQ(\A( Q?\VygflO

Address:; •O-^.-t^-CXff >'Aj •fcg>/\_,^

.... £o^\a'oa/"T?-,

Telephone: I uLJj. --• - .-••..••• __

Eax:

Signed on %~ /^ 20 lj3..

Signature of Petitioner

1-8;

Rev. 01/14/T4
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13549-13550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5253]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5727]


Formation of the United States Delegation to the World 
Radiocommunication Conference: Request for Expressions of Interest in 
Being on the United States Delegation

    Summary: The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) World 
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC) will take place from October 22-
November 16, 2007 in Geneva, Switzerland. As part of the preparations 
for the formation of the United States delegation to the World 
Radiocommunication Conference, the Department of State is requesting

[[Page 13550]]

expressions of interest in being on this delegation.
    All delegation members must be United States citizens. Expressions 
of interest and a description of what company or organization the 
interested person represents and his/her area of expertise should be 
sent to Anne Jillson, International Communications and Information 
Policy, Department of State. Her e-mail address is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cca6a5a0a0bfa3a2ada88cbfb8adb8a9e2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="58323134342b3736393c182b2c392c3d763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>, 
her fax number is 202 647-5957, and her phone number is 202 647-5205.
    Expressions of interest should be received no later than April 10, 
2007.

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Anne D. Jillson,
Foreign Affairs Officer, International Communications and Information 
Policy, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E7-5253 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 51037.

#### Protests 23378-K, etc., of Little Joe Wiesenfeld Co. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchan(ise consist of leather girths and stirrup leathers of the same kind in all material respects as exhibits 2, 3, 4, and illustrative exhibit 5 in *Little Joe Wiesenfeld Co.*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 731). In accordance therewith the claim at 15 percent under paragraph 1530 (f), as modified by T. D. 49753, was sustained.
### Agenda for AF&PA-AWC Meeting with Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

on Non-Hazardous Seconda ry Materials Rule

North Building, 6 th 

### floor conference room Crystal City, VA

April 26, 2011
3:00 to 4:30 PM

Phone Line: (866) 299-3188, conference code 7033088895#

I. Introductions and goal of meeting

II. Overarching concerns (5 minutes)

III. Importance of NHSM to Forest Products Industry and Outreach (10 minutes)

IV. Contained gas definition (10 minutes)

V. Issues with Contaminants Legi timacy Criterion (10 minutes)

VI. Materials of concern (30 minutes)

a. Resinated trim

b. Wastewater Treatment Residuals c. Recycled Paper Residuals/OCC rejects

d. Urban wood

e. TDF f. Others – railway ties (creosote), tall oil, turpentine, and other biomass

residuals

VII. Next Steps (10 minutes be fore Suzanne must leave)
EX-10.3(a)



 Exhibit 10.3(a) 
 June 1, 2014 
 Graham Capital Management, L.P. 

Rock Ledge Financial Center 
 40 Highland Avenue

 Rowayton, CT 06853 
 Attention:
Mr. Paul Sedlack 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewals  
 Dear Mr. Sedlack: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2015 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II 



 

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mrs. Alice Lonero at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1304. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

					
	 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Alice Lonero
	 	
		 	 Alice Lonero
 Chief
Financial Officer 
	 	
		
	GRAHAM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul Sedlack
	 	
		 	Print Name: Paul Sedlack	 	

 AL/sr
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Costa, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 6]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.), rendered February 20, 1992, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he committed murder in the second degree is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245, 250). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s challenge to the prosecution’s statements during summation are also unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski, supra).*In any event, the prosecutor did not interpose his personal opinion, rather his summation specifically left the case to the jury to decide the issues on the evidence and properly avoided irrelevant comments and inflammatory conclusions, focusing on the legitimate issues in the case. While the prosecutor’s reference to the reluctance of an eyewitness to speak to the police may have been improper since it had not been brought out at trial, any error was harmless *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242).

Finally, the defendant’s sentence is not excessive *(see, People*
      *357
      *v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, 84). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
C CS PS

C CS PS C CS PS C CS PS

C CS PS

Ponce Limestone and/or Juana Díaz Formation

Ponce Limestone

Hacienda

Teresa

SC-7

Boca

Chica

SC-5 SC-4 SC-2

SC-3

50

50

100

Sea level

METERS

100

Sea level

FEET

EAST

WEST

150

200

250

300

350

400

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

1,100

1,200

1,300

SC-7

SC-5

SC-4

SC-2 SC-3

CARIBBEAN SEA

Santa Isabel 

Salinas

Patillas

Juana

Díaz

Ponce

Central

Aquirre

Guayama

Arroyo

Playa de

Ponce

Playa de

Santa Isabel

66°37'30" 66°30' 66°22'30" 66°15' 66°07'30" 66°00"

18°00'

17°52'30" 0 5 10 KILOMETERS

0 5 MILES

ATLANTIC OCEAN

CARIBBEAN SEA

Isla

Mona

Isla de

Culebra

Isla de

Vieques

St.

Thomas

St.

 John

St. Croix

Puerto Rico

MAP AREA

Coamo

Coamo

fan delta

0 5 10 KILOMETERS

0 5 MILES

VERTICAL SCALE GREATLY EXAGGERATED

EXPLANATION

Lithology

 Silt and/or clay

 Sand

 Cobbles and sand

 Pebble

 Cobble

 Limestone

 Siltstone, calcareous

 Claystone, calcareous

 Bedrock

Grain size

 CS—Clay- and/or silt-size

 PS—Pebble- and/or sand-size

 C—Cobble-size or larger

Depositional cycle

 Scale

 Small-scale cycle—Depositional cyclicity associated with a short term hydrologic event. Recognized by 

 progressive changes in grain size of clastic detritus within individual bed. Small-scale cycle is usually 

 less than 10 meters thick

 Intermediate-scale cycle—Depositional cyclicity associated with eustatic change in sea level during 

 Quaternary time. Cycle exhibits progressive change in coarse- and fine-grained bed thickness within 

 vertical sequence. Intermediate-scale cycle may range from 25 to 75 meters thick

 Large-scale cycle—Depositional cyclicity associated with tectonic movement that occurs over an 

 extended period of time. Characterized by a progressive change in bed thickness that occurs within 

 the entire vertical sequence. Large-scale cycle may range from 60 to 170 meters

 Scale of cyclicity is uncertain

 Fining-upward sequence—Vertical section exhibits progressive decreases in grain size or decreases in 

 coarse-grained bed thickness; often accompanied by increase in thickness of fine-grained beds

 Coarsening-upward sequence—Vertical section exhibits progressive increase in grain size, or increases 

C CS PS in thickness of coarse-grained beds; often accompanied by decrease in thickness of fine-grained beds

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1419

Cyclic depositional sequences within the southern fan-delta plain—PLATE 3

Renken, Robert A., and others, 2002, Geology and hydrogeology of the Caribbean Islandsaquifer system of the Commonweatlh of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands

CYCLIC DEPOSITIONAL SEQUENCES WITHIN THE SOUTHERN FAN-DELTA PLAIN

By

Robert A. Renken

2002