alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brent Bales, the Chief
Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the managing owner of The Frontier Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Frontier Fund.



/s/ Brent BalesBrent BalesChief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management,
LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier FundSeptember 24, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or any other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to The Frontier Fund and will be retained by The Frontier Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ISAIAS GALAN

- CORTES, AKA Isaias

Cortez, AKA Isaias Galan Cortes,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 21

- 10293

D.C. No.

4:21

- cr

- 00856

- CKJ

- LAB

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022 * *

Before: McKEOWN , CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Isaias Galan

- Cortes appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty

- plea con viction and 21

- month sentence for reentry of a

removed alien , in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California

,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Galan

- Cortes ’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 10293

no grounds for relief, along with a motio n to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided Galan

- Cortes the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No

pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-1665

___________________________

Bernard Fraction,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant,

v.

Douglas County Attorney's Office; Theresia M. Urich; Douglas County

Treasurer's Office; John W. Ewing, Jr., Treasurer; Director of Public Properties;

Dennis Rookstool; Tim Dolan; Richard G. Kopf,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees.

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

 ____________

 Submitted: September 28, 2020

Filed: October 1, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Bernard Fraction appeals after the district court1

 dismissed his complaint for

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It is the plaintiff’s burden to establish the district

court’s subject matter jurisdiction, and, on appeal, we review its existence de novo. 

See Newcombe v. United States, 933 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir. 2019). On careful

review of the record and Fraction’s arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district

court properly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the

complaint.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District of Nebraska.

-2-
#### TOWN OF HAMMONTON, *ET AL.,*APPELLANTS-PETITIONERS, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

April 13, 1964. Denied.

See same case below: 82 *N. J. Super.*64.

*Messrs. Curdo & Donio*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Arthur J. Sills*and *Mr. William L. Boyan,*Deputy Attorney General, for the respondent.

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.
U S. OtWtrnentof TrampOf!Otion O '' {! o: ':' e )e( • eo:Jr• ' o t l ,:l"'1c-Y'3- '· 0fl 

### DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE, PROCESS, ORDERS DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS Chief , Documentary Services Div
. Department of Transportation Washington. D.C. 20590 Docket 

### DOT

- OST -2002

- 12555

ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION, C-55**---""'F'"""R~O""N'-'-"-TIE=R -'--"-'** **A=IRL=INE=-==S~IN...,C.=!....**______________ , having its principal (Name of Company, please pr i nt) office at 700 1 TOWER ROAD DENVER CO 80249 (Address) hereby designates, pursuant to section 46103 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code (former ly section 1005(b) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended) the person named below as its Agent upon whom service of all notices and process , and all orders , decisions, and requirements of the Department of Transportation may be made for and on behalf of said carrier, hereby canceling all previous designations of agents made by it to the DOT. NameofAgent

_ _ _**~H~O~W~ARD~~M~ ~D~IAM~~O~ND~** **---------------** (Please Print) Address 7001 TOWER ROAD DENVER CO 80249 T h e Agent so designated has written**~is ~** **~nd** also his initials in the following space: Name

# /~**~~** (Initials) 

# b1tfJ

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , FRONTIER AIRLINES INC. has caused these (Name of Company) presents to be signed in its name by DAVID SIEGE L

_______ _____ , CEO (Please Print) of said company, and to be attested under its corporate seal by HOWARD 

### M
. DIAMOND,

on this 26th day of January, 2015

(Secretary, or other officer) OST F 1010.5 (1

- 95) L

EGAL\2201 5493 \ 1 SECRETARY
______________ _ (Secretary, or other Title)

FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. (Name ofComp{lly) By:

# ]Y\**...._.___ ---,\---­**  (CEO)
#### In the Matter of SYDNEY VALE STOLDT, an attorney at law.

May 22, 1962.

Suspension lifted and respondent restored to the practice of law.
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Periodic Financial Reports**     I, Robert J. Messey, Vice President of Arch Western Resources, LLC, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the“Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and     (2) information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Arch Western Resources, LLC.       /s/ Robert J. Messey         Robert J. Messey    Vice President       Date: November 14, 2006
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Doron Uziel, the Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer of
      Energtek Inc. (the “Company”), certify, under the standards set forth and solely
      for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to each of their knowledge, the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 14, 2008






By: /s/
      Doron Uziel


Name: Doron
      Uziel


Title: Treasurer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




26
Douglas 

conviction on September 1, 2010. Thus, appellant's petition was untimely 

filed. See NRS 34.726(1). Appellant did not attempt to demonstrate good 

cause for the delay. Although the district court erred in failing to apply 

the procedural time bar, we affirm because the district court reached the 

correct result in denying the petition. See Wyatt u. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 

468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970). 

Moreover, as a separate and independent ground to deny 

relief, we conclude that the record supports the district court's 

determination that appellant was not entitled to credit in this case. 

Appellant committed the offense in this case while he was on bail in 

another case; a person on bail remains in the custody of the State while on 

bail, see Woolsey u. State, 111 Nev. 1440, 1443, 906 P.2d 723, 726 (1995), 

and thus, NRS 176.055(2)(a) precludes credits in this case. Appellant 

received the credit in case C253850, and in entering a plea in this case, 

specifically agreed that he would not receive any credit for time served in 

this case because it had already been received in case C253850. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

W. el-SC-7j: 

Parraguirre 

CSZ lA . 

Cherry 

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge 

Barry Craig Malone 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A cle,49
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14465-14466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5565]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 07-1130; MB Docket No. 03-91; RM-10693]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Wofford Heights, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document grants a petition filed by Dana J. Puopolo 
requesting the allotment of Channel 251A at Wofford Heights, 
California, as its first local aural transmission service. Channel 251A 
can be allotted consistent with the Commission's minimum spacing 
requirements, provided there is a site restriction of 12.8 kilometers 
(7.9 miles) west of Wofford Heights, using reference coordinates 35-43-
28 NL and 118-35-42 WL. The site restriction is necessary to prevent 
short-spacings to the licensed sites of Station KRXV-FM, Channel 251B, 
Yermo, California and Station KDFO-FM, Channel 253B1, Delano, 
California.

DATES: Effective April 23, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MB Docket No. 03-91, adopted March 7, 2007, and released 
March 9, 2007. The Notice of Proposed Rule Making proposed the 
allotment of Channel 251A at Wofford Heights, California. See 68 FR 
18180, published April 15, 2003. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the Commission's Reference Center, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 
20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The 
Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be 
sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to 
the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

[[Page 14466]]


0
As stated in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 
47 CFR part 73 as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under California, is 
amended by adding Wofford Heights, California, Channel 251A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. E7-5565 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date:             |  |                        
|November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal       
|                  |  |                        
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                  |  |                        
|                  |  |                        



*  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4577]



[[Page 11906]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,563]


General Chemical Performance Products, Repauno Products LLC, 
Gibbstown, NJ; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on January 10, 2007, applicable to workers of 
General Chemical Performance Products, Gibbstown, New Jersey. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on January 25, 2007 (72 FR 
3424).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in the production of sodium nitrite.
    New information shows that in July 2006, General Chemical 
Performance Products purchased Repauno Products LLC. Workers separated 
from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under 
separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for Repauno Products 
LLC.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of General Chemical Performance Products who were adversely 
affected by increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,563 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of General Chemical Performance Products, Repauno 
Products LLC, Gibbstown, New Jersey, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after December 6, 2005, through 
January 10, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to 
apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 
of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of March 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-4577 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Michael Brumer, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Richmond County,

October 26, 1978

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Daniel P. Orlan*and *James S. Priola*for proponent. *George J. Robertazzi*for Mildred C. Kinnane, objectant. *Bloom, Epstein, Wayne, Reiss & Milner (Robert M. Milner*of counsel), for Marshall J. Brumer, objectant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Frank D. Paulo, S.

The proponent has moved for an order dismissing the objections filed by one of the legatees to the probate of paragraph "eighth” of the last will and testament of the decedent.

The proponent’s contention on this motion is that the objectant, a legatee under the last will and testament of the decedent, and not a distributee, would lose all of her interest if the will now before the court for probate was denied probate. The proponent cites, for the court’s attention, certain recognized cases that hold, as a matter of law, that where an objectant would not obtain any financial gain by a will offered for probate being denied probate, he has no standing to file objections. (See *Matter of Turner,*86 Misc 2d 132; *Matter of*
      *1055
      *Chadwell,*55 Misc 2d 1033, 1034; *Matter of Rikert,*25 Misc 2d 492.)

The issue presented, however, by these objections filed is a much narrower one. The objectant, in her objections, consents to the probate of the entire will, with the exception of paragraph "eighth” of said will. The issue presented, therefore, by this motion, is not one raised on the probate of the will, but one in which there is objection only to the paragraph that named the proponent as a sole executor and trustee. The legatee, in her objections, alleges "that this paragraph was inserted in said will by mistake of the draftsman thereof, contrary to the instructions of the Testator, and without his knowledge during his lifetime.”

The objectant, in her affirmation in opposition to the motion brought by the proponent, says that she is a person entitled to object under SCPA 103 (subd 36).

The Court of Appeals in *Matter of Weinstock*(40 NY2d 1), has held, where somewhat analogous charges were made, that a species of constructive fraud existed, which warranted the Surrogate in denying probate to a paragraph appointing a father and son, both of whom were attorneys, as executors of a will.

The objections filed also raise a question under SCPA 707 as to whether the proponent is eligible under the statute to be appointed as fiduciary.

While the court has found no case directly in point with the issues raised, the court is satisfied that the objectant, as a legatee under the terms of this will, has a sufficient interest in the qualifications of the executor named to manage the assets in this estate to file objections to his appointment on the grounds alleged. (See *Matter of Scheu,*29 AD2d 626.)

The motion is denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Frontier Fund.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                            
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                              
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                               
|Brent Bales                                                                                                   
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund              
|                                                                                                              
|Date: November 7, 2008
No. 51779.

#### Protest 63208-K of M. Lehmann, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Scotch whisky aged in wooden containers at least 4 years prior to the date of entry or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption; that at the time of withdrawal for consumption the age certificate required by article 459, Customs Regulations of 1937, was not available; and that there now has been filed with the collector a certificate issued by a competent officer of the Government of Great Britain establishing to the satisfaction of the collector that the Scotch whisky in question was in fact aged in wooden containers not less than 4 years prior to exportation to the United States. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.