alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1

GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 2) PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002

I, Richard Francis Sommers, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on Form
6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Gracechurch
Card Funding (No. 2) PLC;                                                                                                                                               
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as
of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;                                  
|  
|3. |  | Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is
included in these reports;                                                                                                                                                     
|  
|4. |  | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement; and                                                          
|  
|5. |  | The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement.

|                                |  |                                               
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|By: /s/ Richard Francis Sommers
|                               
|Name:
Title:
Date:              |  | Richard Francis Sommers
Director
July 15, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, R. Byron Carlock, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, certifies that
(1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the
Company as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and its results of operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.



|                        |  |                           |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/ R. Byron Carlock, Jr.
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  | Name:                     |  | R. Byron Carlock, Jr.                
|                        |  | Title:                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson , Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson ,EPA 

Administrator

40CFR Part CFR Part CFR Part49 – Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas 

Production Facilities , Production Facilities ,Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (Mandan,Hidatsa and Hidatsa and Hidatsa and 

Arikara Nations , Arikara Nations,or MHA Nation or MHA Nation or MHA Nation ),North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota . (as defined in § as defined in § as defined in § 49.152

Carl Daly Carl Daly to: John_McMichael 08/02/2012 11:12 AM

Cc: Christopher_Armstong, Deirdre Rothery, Kate Fay, Sara Laumann

This message is digitally signed.

Mr. McMichael,

This email is to inform you that Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection 

Agency, has signed an interim final rule “Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas 

Production Facilities , Production Facilities ,Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (Mandan,Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Hidatsa and Arikara Nations ,or MHA 

Nation) Nation),North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota ,”(Fort Berthold Oil and Gas FIP)a federal rule that applies to oil and gas 

operations producing from the Bakken Pool on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in North Dakota . 

The FIP requires owners and operators of oil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions of 

volatile organic compounds emanating from well completions , recompletions, and production and storage 

operations. The agency proposed a Reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule .

Please find, attached, a copy of the notification sent by certified mail to the primary contact for XTO 

Energy:

XTO_Actual Notice of FIP Letter 8-1-12.pdf

And a copy of the interim final rule:

Fort Berthold FIP NFR_8-1-12 (interim final rule) for ACTUAL NOTICE LETTERS.pdf

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me or Deirdre Rothery, Chief 

Air Permitting, Monitoring and Modeling Unit at rothery.deirdre@epa.gov or 303-312-6431.

Thank you,

Carl Daly, Director, Air Program

303-312-6416
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of an amendment of the meeting of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) National Advisory Council (NAC) to be held on March 21. 

                    Public notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 27, 2007, Volume 72, Number 38, page 8760 announcing that the CSAT National Advisory Council would be convening on March 21 and March 22 at 1 Choke Cherry Road, Sugarloaf and Seneca Conference Rooms, Rockville, Maryland. The date and location of the meeting have changed. The meeting will be held at the Hilton Washington DC North/Gaithersburg, Salons D & E, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, Maryland on March 21, from 8:45 a.m. to 5 p.m.                 

The contact for additional information remains as announced. 

Dated: March 15, 2007. 

Toian Vaughn, 

Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7-5148 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
Before the First Division,

May 26, 1948

No. 52345.

protests 96059-K, etc. (New York).

#### Tuteur & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The undisputed facts showed that the present merchandise is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon, Inc.*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 32.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
the Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Managed Futures Index
Series.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                         
|Robert J. Enck President
and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                                           
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                            
|Brent Bales Chief Financial
Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund                 

Date: May 12, 2011
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8391 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 with respect to 

cost sharing provisions for the territories and Indian Tribes, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2024 

Mr. MOYLAN (for himself, Mrs. PELTOLA, and Mrs. GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 

with respect to cost sharing provisions for the territories 

and Indian Tribes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COST SHARING PROVISIONS FOR THE TERRI4 TORIES AND INDIAN TRIBES. 

5 Section 1156 of the Water Resources Development 

6 Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2310) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘up to 

8 $200,000’’; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8391 IH

1 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘the waiver 

2 amount described in subsection (a)’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘any amount waived under subsection (a)’’; and 

4 (3) by striking subsection (b) and redesignating 

5 subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (b) and (c), 

6 respectively. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CanoPetroleum, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Morris B. Smith, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in theReport.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as anexhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K andSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 202 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and,accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 
| November 14, 2006 | /s/ Morris B. Smith     |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|              | Morris B. Smith         |   |
|              | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Before the First Division,

November 17, 1948

No. 52679.

protests 134351-K, etc. (New York).

#### Hoffman La Roche, Inc. *v.*United States,

*240Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United, States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         In connection with the Annual Report of Hotels.com (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
S. Litman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                     /s/ David S. Litman


                                                     David S. Litman
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     March 27, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hotels.com and will be retained by Hotels.com and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
March 25, 1952

No. 56513. Suit 4666.

#### Freund Mayer & Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1280 reversed January 29, 1952. C. A. D. 474.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50892 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ-ZAPATA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-108-1-AML

-------------------- Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Santiago Rodriguez-Zapata raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Timothy McCauliff v. Daniel J. O’Sullivan et al.

Superior Court, Worcester, SS

No. 9902543

Memorandum Dated September 26, 2000

Fecteau, J.

This is a “dram shop” action, subject to the provisions of G.L.c. 231, §60J, in which the plaintiff alleges that due to the excessive service of intoxicating liquor to the defendant O’Sullivan by employees of McBain, d/b/a [“Captain’s”], he was assaulted and battered by O’Sullivan due to his intoxication.

The defendant is seeking to strike the plaintiffs affidavit,1 filed under the said statute, on the ground that it does not contain sufficient facts to raise a legitimate question of liability, but merely repeats the conclusory statements of the plaintiffs complaint.

The statute in question, added by the legislature in 1985, has had few opportunities for interpretation. The command of the statute calls for the plaintiff, either at the time of the filing of his complaint, or within 90 days, to file “an affidavit setting forth sufficient facts to raise a legitimate question of liability appropriate for judicial inquiry.” This is the same threshold over which medical malpractice cases must pass at the time of a tribunal convened under c. 231, §60B, except that for a medical malpractice case, a plaintiff must file an offer of proof, containing sufficient records or statements, including those of an expert, to substantiate the allegations.

The statute in question does not define “affidavit” nor the minimum standards of proof for statements made in the affidavit. Generally, an affidavit is “a statement under oath by a person having direct knowledge of the facts which he verifies, except as otherwise clearly stated in the affidavit itself.” *Howland v. Cape Cod Bank and Trust Co.,*26 Mass.App.Ct. 948, 949 (1988). Neither the statute, nor the general definition require the same level of personal knowledge as Rule 56(e) of the Mass. R. Civil Proc., which require that an affidavit be “made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein."

Concededly, the affidavit parrots the allegations of the complaint. However, it does contain some facts that the affiant provides as a matter of personal knowledge and others for which a source of information is not apparent, but inferentially, are upon information and belief. Given the lack of definition of what the affidavit ought to contain beyond “facts,” the affidavit in question, filed by the plaintiff on July 31, 2000, is sufficient. Consequently, the defendant’s motions to strike the affidavit and for summary judgment, premised upon the insufficiency of the affidavit, are denied.

1

 The first affidavit filed on behalf of the plaintiff was defective in that it was signed by plaintiffs counsel. Obviously when alerted to this by the defendant’s motion, it was corrected by one signed by the plaintiff. The two affidavits read alike.
#### ANTHONY T. BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GLADYS KELLY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued May 19, 1964

Decided June 1, 1964.

*Mr. Leonard J. Felzenberg*argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant *(Messrs. Boshein, Kronisch, Felzenberg & Mandell,*attorneys).

*Mr. Herbert Ziff*argued the cause for defendant-respondent *(Mr. Allen Zavodniclc,*of counsel; *Messrs. Knoeppel & Ziff,*attorneys).

*363The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Ctjeiam.

Plaintiff fell on the public sidewalk in front of defendant’s premises. A snowstorm had occurred on February 4, 1961. Defendant made no effort to remove the snow in spite of a municipal ordinance requiring removal within 12 hours of daylight after the storm. On February 6, while walking across the sidewalk, plaintiff was caused to fall by the accumulation of snow and ice. He sued for damages alleging negligence in that defendant violated a duty owed him in failing to clear away the snow. There was no other charge of negligence and plaintiff’s case was dismissed at the end of his opening to the jury.

 On appeal plaintiff concedes the law to be that the snow removal ordinance creates no duty running from the property owner to him. *Sewall v. Fox,*98 *N. J. L.*819*(E. & A.*1923); *Zemetra v. Fenchel Realty Co., Inc.,*134 *N. J. L.*358*(Sup. Ct.*1946), affirmed o. b. 135 *N. J. L.*205*(E. & A.*1947); Annotation, 82 *A. L. R. 2d*998 (1962). He recognizes also that for many years New Jersey has adhered to the rule followed in the great majority of jurisdictions that an owner of property abutting a public sidewalk is under no obligation to pedestrians to keep the sidewalk free from snow and ice which accumulate thereon from natural causes. *Sewall v. Fox, supra; Taggart v. Bouldin,*111 *N. J. L.*464*(E. & A.*1933); Stevenson, “Law of Streets and Sidewalks in New Jersey,” 3 *Rutgers L. Rev.*19, 25 (1949). Plaintiff criticizes the rule and asks that it be re placed by a doctrine which imposes such a duty on the abutting owner. In the situation presented here, we see no sound reason for doing so.

Affirmed.

*For affirmance*— Chief Justice Weinteatjb, and Justices Feanois, Peootoe, Hall, Schettino and Hanemaf — 6.

*For reversal*— None.