14502 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 28, 2007 / Proposed Rules 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2006–

0342, dated November 9, 2006; and BAE 

Systems (Operations) Limited Modification 

Service Bulletin SB.25–495–60730A, dated 

March 14, 2006; or Revision 1, dated May 9, 

2006; for related information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 

21, 2007. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–5650 Filed 3–27–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 81 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2006–AZ–0558; FRL–8292–

7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Designation of 

Areas for Air Quality Planning 

Purposes; State of Arizona; Boundary 

Redesignation; Finding of Attainment 

for Miami Particulate Matter of 10 

Microns or Less (PM10) Nonattainment 

Area; Determination Regarding 

Applicability of Certain Clean Air Act 

Requirements; Correction 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

the State of Arizona’s boundary 

redesignation of the Hayden/Miami 

PM10 nonattainment area into two 

separate PM10 nonattainment areas: 

Hayden and Miami. EPA is also 

proposing to find that the Miami PM10

nonattainment area is attaining the PM10

national ambient air quality standard, 

and, based on this attainment finding, 

EPA is proposing to determine that 

certain Clean Air Act requirements are 

not applicable for so long as the Miami 

area shows continued attainment of the 

standard based on current, publicly 

available, quality-assured monitoring 

data. EPA is taking this action 

consistent with obligations under the 

Clean Air Act to act on State 

redesignations. Lastly, EPA is proposing 

to correct two errors in previous 

rulemakings that involved the 

designations of PM10 areas within the 

State of Arizona. 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by April 27, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–

OAR–2006–AZ–0558 by one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• E-mail: tax.wienke@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (415) 947–3579 (please alert 

the individual listed in 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if 

you are faxing comments). 

• Mail: Wienke Tax, Office of Air 

Planning, Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR–

2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. 

• Hand Delivery: Wienke Tax, Office 

of Air Planning, Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9, 

Mailcode AIR–2, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, California 94105–3901. 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:55 

p.m., excluding federal holidays. 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R09–OAR–2006–

AZ–0558. EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal information provided, 

unless the comment includes 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA, without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Office of Air Planning, 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR–2, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. EPA requests 

that if at all possible, you contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to view 

the hard copy of the docket. You may 

view the hard copy of the docket 

Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 

p.m., excluding federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Wienke Tax, Office of Air Planning, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 9, (520) 622–1622, e-mail: 

tax.wienke@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, wherever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

the EPA. 

This proposal addresses EPA’s 

approval of the State of Arizona’s 

boundary redesignation of the Hayden/ 

Miami PM10 nonattainment area into 

two separate PM10 nonattainment areas: 

Hayden and Miami. EPA is also 

proposing to find that the Miami PM10

nonattainment area is attaining the PM10

national ambient air quality standard, 

and, based on this attainment finding, 

EPA is proposing to determine that 

certain Clean Air Act requirements are 

not applicable for so long as the Miami 

area shows continued attainment of the 

standard based on current, publicly 

available, quality-assured monitoring 

data. EPA is taking this action 

consistent with obligations under the 

Clean Air Act to act on State 

redesignations. Lastly, EPA is proposing 

to correct two errors in previous 

rulemakings that involved the 

designations of PM10 areas within the 

State of Arizona. 

In the Rules and Regulations section 

of this Federal Register, we are taking 

direct final action to take these actions 

because we believe that they are not 

controversial. If we receive adverse 

comments, however, we will publish a 

timely withdrawal of the direct final 

rule and address the comments in 

subsequent action based on this 

proposed rule. We do not plan to open 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 28, 2007 / Proposed Rules 14503 

a second comment period, so anyone 

interested in commenting should do so 

at this time. If we do not receive 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. 

For all the reasons set forth in the 

parallel direct final rule, we are 

proposing to approve the State of 

Arizona’s boundary redesignation of the 

Hayden/Miami PM10 nonattainment 

area into two separate PM10

nonattainment areas: Hayden and 

Miami, and to determine that the Miami 

moderate PM10 nonattainment area in 

Arizona is attaining the PM10 national 

ambient air quality standard. A 

determination of attainment is not a 

redesignation to attainment under CAA 

section 107(d)(3) because we have not 

yet approved a maintenance plan as 

required under section 175A of the CAA 

or determined that the area has met the 

other CAA requirements for 

redesignation. 

Also, for all the reasons set forth in 

the parallel direct final rule, we further 

propose to determine that, because the 

Miami area is attaining the PM10

NAAQS, certain attainment 

demonstration requirements, along with 

other related requirements of the CAA, 

are not applicable to the Miami area for 

so long as the area continues to attain. 

Lastly, EPA is proposing to correct two 

errors in previous rulemakings that 

involved the classification of PM10

nonattainment areas within the State of 

Arizona. 

For further information on this 

proposal and the rationale underlying 

our proposed action, please see the 

direct final rule. 

Dated: March 20, 2007. 

Wayne Nastri, 

Regional Administrator, Region 9. 

[FR Doc. E7–5662 Filed 3–27–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 67 

[Docket No. FEMA–B 7711] 

Proposed Flood Elevation 

Determinations 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: Technical information or 

comments are requested on the 

proposed Base (1% annual chance) 

Flood Elevations (BFEs) and proposed 

BFEs modifications for the communities 

listed below. The BFEs are the basis for 

the floodplain management measures 

that the community is required either to 

adopt or to show evidence of being 

already in effect in order to qualify or 

remain qualified for participation in the 

National Flood Insurance Program 

(NFIP). 

DATES: The comment period is ninety 

(90) days following the second 

publication of this proposed rule in a 

newspaper of local circulation in each 

community. 

ADDRESSES: The proposed BFEs for each 

community are available for inspection 

at the office of the Chief Executive 

Officer of each community. The 

respective addresses are listed in the 

table below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

William R. Blanton, Jr., Engineering 

Management Section, Mitigation 

Division, Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3151. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Federal Emergency Management Agency 

(FEMA) proposes to make 

determinations of BFEs and modified 

BFEs for each community listed below, 

in accordance with section 110 of the 

Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 

42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a). 

These proposed BFEs and modified 

BFEs, together with the floodplain 

management criteria required by 44 CFR 

60.3, are the minimum that are required. 

They should not be construed to mean 

that the community must change any 

existing ordinances that are more 

stringent in their floodplain 

management requirements. The 

community may at any time enact 

stricter requirements of its own, or 

pursuant to policies established by other 

Federal, State or regional entities. These 

proposed elevations are used to meet 

the floodplain management 

requirements of the NFIP and are also 

used to calculate the appropriate flood 

insurance premium rates for new 

buildings built after these elevations are 

made final, and for the contents in these 

buildings. 

National Environmental Policy Act. 

This proposed rule is categorically 

excluded from the requirements of 44 

CFR part 10, Environmental 

Consideration. An environmental 

impact assessment has not been 

prepared. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood 

elevation determinations are not within 

the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory 

flexibility analysis is not required. 

Regulatory Classification. This 

proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under the criteria of 

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 of 

September 30, 1993, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735. 

Executive Order 13132, Federalism. 

This proposed rule involves no policies 

that have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform. This proposed rule meets the 

applicable standards of Executive Order 

12988. 

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is 

proposed to be amended as follows: 

PART 67—[AMENDED] 

1. The authority citation for part 67 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; 

Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, 

1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 

3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376. 

§ 67.4 [Amended] 

2. The tables published under the 

authority of § 67.4 are proposed to be 

amended as follows: 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS