alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## THEAT&-ORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS

Ronorable Robert S. Calvert Comptroller of Pub110Acoounts Capitol Station Austin, Texas Opinion No. W 142 Re: Construction of Appropriation contained in Section 7 of Senate Bill 222 of the 55th Legislature -- the Dear Mr. Calvert: insurance reorganieation bills Your request for an opinion on the certifloation of Senate Bill 222 reads as follows:

‘1 have before meSenate Bill Flo. 222 for certification under 8ectfon 49a of Article III of the State Constitution. Before placing my certificate upon thie bill, I derlre your interpretation of the language In Sec. 7 thereof, which Is quoted, in pert, below;

not ‘There $8hereby appropriated to the 8tate Building Commission for the period of time beginni Augurt 

### 3,

“ft September 1, ‘1957. and endlngg 1959, to obtain a site, plan, design, construct 

### aad equip an office bullding or ‘otherwise obtain adequate housing fa&ilities to house the State Board of Insurance, ita offioes and employees, all unexpended balancea on hand or in special funds credited to the 8tate Board of Insurance Conm~issionera or the State Board of Iasuranoe~on Augusth$ monies appropriated exclusively ‘for other purposes In the General Appropriation Bill for the fiscal years ending August 31; 1958 andAugust 31, 1959.t (Underscorlng supplied). %he specific question before meIs whether or the revenues derived under Articles 7064 and. I,

:

:

.

0,

.

. .

Bonorable Robert 3. Caliert,’ page 2 

### Wi-142

part, as

part, as 7064a of the Revfsed~Clvll Statutes 

### are included

In the language underscored above, and, if bo, do such revenues Oomewithin the except&"ed,” Articlie 

### 7064 Vernon’s Clvll Statutes, izovidcm, in follows: ?Jpoti +ceipt by the l$oard of ’ Insurance Ct+uisaloaeqs of the sworn statements, showin# tha gross, premiumreceipts 

### by sudh Insurance callrlera,~ the Boar4 of Insurance Commission&s shall certify to the State Treasurer the amountof taxes
Carrie? apall receive a permit to do.buslneas in this. State untfl all such taxes are paid,” (Bmphasir buPs-) Article 7064a Vernonl~sCivil Statutea 

### prkidee, la follows 8
“Uponreceipt 

### by it of the swan statement above provided, the Board of Insurance 

### Comissioners shall certify to the State .Treasurer the amountof

Since. the’revenue ‘derived under Article 7064’and Article 

### 7064a are taxes required to be paid to the State Treea;- ,wer, 

### ,such .revenues are not revenues received by the,,State, 

### Board of Insurance. SiMARY

Revenues derived under Article& 7061 and 

### 7064a, Vernon’s Ciyll Statutes, are not appropriated to the State Building Commlsslon in Section 7 of Skate Bill 222 of the 55th Legislature s,ince such revenues are taxes to 

### be paid to the,State Treasurer andare,:not revenue8 received by the State Board of Insurance.

. :Honorable Robert 3. Calvert, page 3 Wf-142 Yours very truly, w1lJ.lWIlBON Attorney General of Texar JR:jas: rh APPRCVRDI OPINION CONNITTElC H. Orady’Chaadler, CheirnI8n J. C. Davis Jr. Wayland C. hvers , Jr. B H. Tlm~Ur, Jr. RRVIRUZD

FORTRRATTORRRY

GlUU!RAL By: 000. P. Blaokburn
(Reap. Dec. 8471)

#### A & S Camera Supply Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 789048.

*397(Decided July 21, 1955)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of the appealing party when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing.

Pursuant to rule 5 of the rules of this court, I have examined the record in the appeal presently before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. Therefore, I find and hold that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Phantom Checklist

Preflight:

WX conditions and Wind limits checked to be within tolerance (do not attempt to fly in winds

exceeding 20km/hr)

Propellers securely installed, undamaged and not excessively bent (unbend by hand if necessary)

Camera lens cap and gimbal clamp removed

SD card installed

Fully charged battery installed and secure

Place Phantom on level surface away from nearby obstacles, into the wind and facing away from 

operator

Power-up:

Power on WiFi extender

Transmitter switches S1 & S2 in the UP position

Power on transmitter

Check transmitter battery level (solid green light)

Power on Phantom

Perform a compass calibration if your location has changed significantly (see manual)

Confirm WiFi extender has a flashing green system light

Open Wifi settings on Apple device and connect to Phantom 3 Professional

Open the DJI Vision app and click CAMERA.

Before takeoff:

Confirm satellite lock and return-to-home point is loaded (rapidly flashing green LED followed by

steady flashing)

Point aircraft into the wind

Confirm camera control and FPV by briefly tilting camera up and down

If recording video, push RECORD

Observers warned that Phantom is taking off

Takeoff:

Climb away from obstacles, into the wind and above head height

Establish a hover and confirm Phantom will hold position with GPS

Confirm FPV is streaming and adjust view angle as necessary

Note battery level and takeoff time

Craig Hofland

Phone: 715.808.8033

Fax: 877.643.9003

150 Kusilek St.

River Falls, WI 54022

Email: craig@isit2bmarketing.com
Mission:

Note time enroute and establish a “bingo time” when you must return home to have adequate

battery to get home

CAUTION: Winds will affect this greatly; allow extra time to return if return will be into the wind

Maintain radio and visual line-of-sight

Utilize a spotter to maintain visual contact when available

Always verify recording status during the mission

Recovery:

Preferred recovery is by hand, especially on uneven terrain or with tall vegetation

Safety glasses or glasses offering ballistic protection shall be utilized

Establish a hover above head height and a safe distance away then move towards the Phantom and 

grab the landing gear

Once the Phantom is securely held above head level, hold the throttle stick to the down position for 

three seconds

Do not move the Phantom to below head level until the blades have stopped completely

Postflight:

Power off the Phantom, transmitter and Wifi extender

Remove the SD card and secure

Any visible moisture present on the system shall be wiped off prior to storage

If moisture was present during the flight, do not seal the Phantom in the case for a prolonged

period until it can be aired out in a dry environment for a minimum of eight hours

Charge the Wifi extender, Phantom batteries and ensure extra transmitter batteries are available

for the next mission

Download the contents of the SD card, delete from the SD card and re-install into the Phantom

Perform maintenance, check for loose parts, and physical integrity of sUAS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal will hold a meeting on April 4, 2007, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance. The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: 

## Wednesday, April 4, 2007—10:30 a.m. until 5 p.m. 

The purpose of this meeting is to review the Pilgrim license renewal application and the associated Safety Evaluation Report. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., and other interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. 

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Ms. Maitri Banerjee (telephone 301/415-6973) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted. 

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 6:45 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda. 

Dated: March 15, 2007. 

Cayetano Santos, 

Acting Branch Chief, ACRS.

[FR Doc. E7-5335 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 47447.

#### Protests 702237-G, etc., of J. L. Hudson Co. et al. (Detroit, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 56 (Friday, March 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13807-13808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Notice of Availability of Final Policy Guidance

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HHS.

ACTION: Final Agency Guidance and Response to Public Comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HRSA is publishing a final Agency Guidance (``Policy 
Information Notice'' (PIN) 2007-09) to describe and clarify HRSA's 
current policy and process for resolving issues and conflicts related 
to health center service area overlap. The PIN, ``Service Area Overlap: 
Policy and Process,'' and the Agency's ``Response to Public Comments'' 
are available on the Internet at http://bphc.hrsa.gov/chc/sao.htm.

DATES: The effective date of this final Agency guidance is March 12, 
2007.
    Background: HRSA manages the Health Center Program, which supports 
more than 3,800 health care delivery sites, including community health 
centers, migrant health centers, health care for the homeless centers, 
and public housing primary care centers. Health centers serve clients 
that are primarily low-income and minorities, and deliver preventive 
and primary care services to patients regardless of their ability to 
pay. Charges for health care services are set according to income.
    On June 22, 2006, HRSA made the draft PIN, ``Service Area Overlap: 
Policy and Process,'' available for public comment on HRSA's Web site. 
The purpose of the PIN is to describe and clarify HRSA's current policy 
and process for resolving issues and conflicts related to health center 
service area overlap. Comments were due to HRSA by August 18, 2006.

[[Page 13808]]

    Comments were received from 28 organizations and/or individuals. 
After review and careful consideration of all comments received, HRSA 
amended the PIN to incorporate certain recommendations from the public. 
The final PIN reflects these changes.
    In addition to making the final PIN available on HRSA's Web site, 
HRSA is also posting the Agency's ``Response to Public Comments.'' The 
purpose of that document is to summarize the major comments received 
and describe the Agency's response, including any corresponding changes 
made to the PIN. Where comments did not result in a revision to the 
PIN, explanations are provided.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Shannon Dunne Faltens 
at 301-594-4060 for any questions regarding this PIN.

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Elizabeth M. Duke,
Administrator.
 [FR Doc. E7-5291 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
Exhibit 32.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Managed Futures Index Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                      
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                        
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                         
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                             
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 7, 2008
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-2872-17T4

ERIKA LEVIN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF REVIEW,

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and

CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP 

BOARD OF EDUCATION T/A

CHERRY HILL HIGH SCHOOL

EAST,

Respondents-Respondents.

Submitted December 17, 2018 – Decided

Before Judges Gooden Brown and Rose.

On appeal from the Board of Review, Department of 

Labor, Docket No. 107,654.

Erika Levin, appellant pro se.

Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General, attorney for 

respondent Board of Review (Melissa H. Raksa, 

Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Jessica M. 

Saxon, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

January 4, 2019
2

A-2872-17T4

Respondent Cherry Hill Township Board of Education 

T/A Cherry Hill High School East has not filed a brief.

PER CURIAM

Claimant Erika Levin appeals from a February 23, 2018 final decision of 

the Board of Review (Board) denying her claim for unemployment benefits from 

her employer, Cherry Hill Township Board of Education t/a Cherry Hill High 

School East (Cherry Hill)1 because she left work "without good cause 

attributable to such work." N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). 

Pertinent to this appeal, the Board determined Cherry Hill had filed a 

timely appeal. Before us, the Board acknowledges Cherry Hill's appeal was 

untimely and, accordingly, seeks a remand to reexamine its determination. In 

its brief, the Board represents claimant consented to that request.2 Claimant 

does not contend otherwise. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to reconsider 

the timeliness of Cherry Hill's appeal from the Appeal Tribunal's decision 

awarding claimant benefits, and her eligibility for such benefits.

 

1 Cherry Hill did not file a responding brief on appeal.

2 According to the Board, claimant consented to a remand during a telephone 

conversation on August 17, 2018. 
3

A-2872-17T4

Vacated and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this 

opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction.
#### Randy LaFleur, Respondent, v Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Defendant, and Capital Cities/ ABC, Inc., Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

[633 NYS2d 496]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered May 5, 1994, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant’s liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) was established as a matter of law since defendant breached its nondelegable duty to provide adequate safety devices to prevent plaintiffs fall from a ladder upon which he was working *(see, Gordon v Eastern Ry. Supply,*82 NY2d 555, 561-562). The fact that the ladder was provided by another party does not relieve defendant from liability. The failure to provide adequate safety devices was a substantial cause of plaintiff’s fall and resulting injuries which were foreseeable in light of such risk *(see, supra).*That the ladder was knocked over by a cabinet which collapsed when the plaintiff touched it with his hand was not such an extraordinary event as to constitute a superseding cause *(see, supra; Robinson v NAB Constr. Corp.,*210 AD2d 86; *Quinlan v Eastern Refractories Co.,*217 AD2d 819). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The
      Board
      of Directors


First
      Mutual Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the First Mutual Bancshares, Inc.
      and Subsidiaries 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan Registration Statement
      on
      Form S-8 filed July 7, 2000, of our report dated March 14, 2007, with respect
      to
      the consolidated statement of financial condition of First Mutual Bancshares,
      Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the
      related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows
      for the three years ended December 31, 2006, and in our same report, with
      respect to First Mutual Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries, management’s
      assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
      and
      the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which is
      included in the annual report on Form 10-K of First Mutual Bancshares, Inc.
      and
      Subsidiaries, for the year ended December 31, 2006.











/s/
      Moss
      Adams LLP





Everett,
      Washington


March
      14,
      2007
(Reap. Dec. 9191)

#### D. C. Andrews & Company, Inc*.*Excelsior Engineering Company v. United States

Entry No. 883772.

(Decided July 16, 1958)

Plaintiffs not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiffs.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

*495I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
September 21, 1945

No. 50514.

#### Protest 108327-K of Edward I. Petow & Son.

C. D. 933. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dynamic Response Group, Inc; (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Melissa K. Rice , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: April 20, 2009



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Melissa K. Rice                     
|Melissa K. Rice, Chief Executive Officer
Page of POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040269Page of POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040269

Rem a rks: