CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Santa Barbara County APCD

Rule No(s): 339 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: June 19, 2008

Rule Title(s): Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: March 5, 2008/May 28, 2008/June 24, 2008

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): April 17, 1997

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? √ Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Rebecca Armstrong Phone Number: 805-961-8888 E-mail Address: ArmstrongR@sbcapcd.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule √ Amended Rule

Rule 339 (Revised): Rule 339 was revised per the 2007 Clean Air Plan commitment for the Santa Barbara

County Air Pollution Control (APCD) to adopt the Air Resources Board Suggested Control Measure (SCM) to

control volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from coating and solvents associat ed with the coating of

motor vehicles, mobile equipment, and associated parts and components. The rule revision includes the SCM

coating and solvent VOC limits. Ho wever, the APCD included an exemption for presanding solvent to remove

grease, wax, and road tar. This exemption includes a limit of 20 gallons per year per fa cility. Staff worked closely

with industry and have concluded that this exemption will enable auto body shop staff to produce an excellent

paint finish without the risk of hav ing to re-do the paint job. This rule also includes an annual reporting

requirement that previously existed in Rule 339. This annual report process will enable the APCD to verify the

compliance with this exemption as well as the so lvent and coating limit requirements of this rule.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): √ ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

_

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase √ Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for th is Source Category: 0.1404 tons/day or 51 tons/year of ROG

Inventory Year Used to Calcul ate Changes in Emissions: 2002 Area Affected: Santa Barbara County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) : There are approximately 70 permitted facilities (known) that w ill be subject to this revised rule. From these existing

subject facilities, a total 51 tons per year ROG emissions reductions will be achieved by the year 2010.CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure: 15.8 tons per day ROG

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control M easure: 0.1404 tons per day of ROG with 100 percent of

rule implementation in the year 2010.

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment √ Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 70

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? √ Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) Section D of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achi eving Emission Reductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): D Work Practice Standards in Section(s): ____

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): F.1-F.6 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): F.7CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

6/20/08 VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP √ Impacts attainment

Discussion: Impacts attainment in a positive way in that ROG emissions shall be decreased.

FORM28.DOC