alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8308 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 

2003. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 8308 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nutria Eradication 

3 and Control Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NUTRIA ERADICATION AND 

5 CONTROL ACT OF 2003. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(e) of the Nutria Eradi7 cation and Control Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 8102(e)) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘2025’’ and inserting ‘‘2030’’. 

9 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 3(a) of the 

10 Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 

11 8102(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘ ‘Secretary’),’’ and in12 serting ‘‘ ‘Secretary’)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8308 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the Nutria Eradication and Control 

Act of 2003.
#### Mary A. Warner, *Respondent, v.*Mercy Henderson, *Appellant.*

Motion denied.
July 5, 1940

No. 44094.

#### Protest 18063-K of Ciba Co.

Application by plaintiff for rehearing granted.
EXHIBIT 15

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, dated
January 30, 2006, on the consolidated financial statements of Metalink Ltd. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005 into the Registration Statements
on Form S-8, No. 333-121901, No. 333-12064, 333-88172 and 333-112755, and on
Form F-3 No. 333-104147, and No. 333-13806, included in this Annual Report on
form 20-F of the Company.


------------------------------------
BRIGHTMAN ALMAGOR & CO
Certified Public Accountants
A member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Tel Aviv, Israel
June 25, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Rodriguez, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 601]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered June 20, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of the branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The handgun that was recovered by the police in the automobile that the defendant was driving was properly admitted into evidence. It is well settled that the automobile exception to the search warrant requirement permits the police to search a vehicle without a warrant when they have probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime, contraband, or a weapon may be found therein *(see, People v Galak,*81 NY2d 463; *People v Belton,*55 NY2d 49). The police had probable cause to search the defendant’s automobile based on information provided to them by an identified citizen who accused the defendant of a specific crime *(see, People v Burton,*194 AD2d 683).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-51179 Conference Calendar

JAMES HENRY BANKHEAD, also known as H. Bankhead, also known as James X, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES HEYENS, Nurse, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-97-CV-690

- - - - - - - - - - August 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James Henry Bankhead, Texas prisoner # 347694, has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal, following the dismissal of his complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). By moving for IFP status, Bankhead is challenging the district court’s certification that IFP status should not be granted on appeal because his appeal presents no nonfrivolous issues and is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).No. 98-51179 -2- Bankhead argues that the district court erred in holding that James Heyens was not deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Bankhead’s medical records indicate that he received adequate medical care for his stomach problems. Bankhead’s disagreement with his medical treatment does not establish a constitutional violation. See Norton v. Dimazana , 122 F.3d 286, 292 (5th Cir. 1997). Bankhead has not shown that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Accordingly, we uphold the district court’s order certifying that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue. Bankhead’s request for IFP status is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of Bankhead’s § 1983 action as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous also counts as a strike for purposes of § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.
Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Bankhead already had one strike against him for purposes of § 1915(g) in Bankhead v. Turnbow , No. 7:97-CV-160 (N.D. Tex. July 11, 1997), which was affirmed by this court in Bankhead v. Turnbow , No. 97-10886 (5th Cir. Dec. 10, 1997). Bankhead has now accumulated three strikes. He may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8163 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8163

  To amend title 10, United States Code, to permanently add stainless 
  steel flatware to the list of covered items required to be procured 
             from American sources, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2024

 Ms. Tenney (for herself and Mr. Williams of New York) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 10, United States Code, to permanently add stainless 
  steel flatware to the list of covered items required to be procured 
             from American sources, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Ordinance Requiring 
Kitchenware Specifically Made in America Act'' or the ``FORKS Made in 
America Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT ADDITION OF DOMESTICALLY PRODUCED STAINLESS STEEL 
              FLATWARE TO THE BERRY AMENDMENT.

    (a) Addition to Covered Items.--
            (1) In general.--Section 4862(b) is amended by adding at 
        the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Stainless steel flatware.''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect on October 1, 2023.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 854(a)(3) of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116-92) is 
amended by striking ``paragraphs (3) and (4)'' and inserting 
``paragraph (4)''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8308 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8308

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To reauthorize the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nutria Eradication and Control 
Reauthorization Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NUTRIA ERADICATION AND CONTROL ACT OF 2003.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(e) of the Nutria Eradication and Control 
Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 8102(e)) is amended by striking ``2025'' and 
inserting ``2030''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Section 3(a) of the Nutria Eradication 
and Control Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 8102(a)) is amended by striking 
```Secretary'),'' and inserting ```Secretary')''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 8308

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To reauthorize the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    350
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          350
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   8,928
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                             (9,578)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              350
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        9,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (9,578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (9,578)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.01)



</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

331 

KA 10-00807 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

MICHAEL SPRINGS, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET SOMES OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (STEPHEN X. O’BRIEN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(Francis A. Affronti, J.), rendered August 19, 2008. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first

degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a

weapon in the second degree (two counts). 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: March 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
No. 45044.

#### Protests 891390-G, etc., of De Boer & Livingston (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the atomizers are of the same character as those passed upon in Abstract 44140. They were accordingly held dutiable as glass articles at 60 percent under paragraph 218(f) as claimed.
Exhibit
      32








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Tony Philipp, the Chief Executive Officer and Paul Schmidt, the
      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of UPSNAP, INC. (the “Company”), DO HEREBY
      CERTIFY that:





1. The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
      2006 (as amended by amendment no.1) (the “Report”), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
      14 th day of
      August 2006.





/s/
      Tony Philipp


Tony
      Philipp


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





/s/
      Paul Schmidt


Paul
      Schmidt


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      UpSNAP, Inc. and will he retained by UpSNAP, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 52373.

protests 649784-G, etc. (New York).

#### Comet Textile Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*332Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
#### Clark L. Anderson, *Appellant, v.*Chauncey Palmer and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by -Bookes, J.
Order entered October 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01700-CV

ORCA ASSETS, G.P., L.L.C., Appellant

V.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-05303

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s October 21, 2014 unopposed second motion for an extension of 

time to file a reply brief. Appellant shall file its reply brief by OCTOBER 29, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
No. 40232.

#### Protest 44546-G of Geo. M. Boutross Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tu son, J.

On the record presented filet laces similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Jabara*(22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
#### MARCELLA H. DECKER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES A. DECKER, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Messrs. Heuser & Heuser*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Benjamin Gruber*for the respondent.

January 16, 1968.

Denied.
#### PETER VAN ZANDT LANE, Appellant, v. JEDEDIAH K. HAYWARD, as Executor, etc., of EMMA BARTLETT, Deceased, Respondent.

*A pleading, amended on the trial*— *need not he served.*

Where an amendment to an answer is allowed on the trial, an amended answer need not be served, unless such service is made a condition of the allowance. The amendment becomes part of the record upon being allowed.

Appeal from an order of the Special Term denying plaintiff’s motion to strike an alleged amended answer from the judgment-roll.

*Hemy*Brewster, for the appellant.

*J. K.*Hayward, for the respondent.

Dwight, J.:

This motion seems to have been properly disposed of at the Special Term. It was based upon the ground that the alleged amended answer was never served on the plaintiff’s attorney, but that, having been handed to his counsel and retained by him merely for submission to the attorney, reserving the latter’s right to object thereto, it was refused by him and returned to the defendant. But it appears, from all the papers used on the motion, that the amendment was allowed by the referee on the trial and was required to be stated orally in open court, and that instead of being then and there embodied in the referee’s minutes, it was, for greater convenience, subsequently reduced to writing by the defendant and copies furnished to the referee and to counsel for the plaintiff. These being the facts, there was no ground for this motion. An amendment allowed on the trial, does not require to be served, unless such.service is made a condition of the allowance; it becomes part of the *584record upon being allowed. There remains, no doubt, the question whether the amendment was properly allowed, and that ruling, if excepted to, will come up for review on appeal from the judgment. It cannot be reviewed on a motion to strike the amended pleading from the judgment-roll.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with ten dollars costs of appeal and disbursements.

Davis, P. J., and Brady, J., concurred.

Order affirmed, witli ten dollars costs and disbursements.
#### HAROLD McCRICKARD, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. RAYMOND FENNELL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

■ *Mr. Boceo Wm. Do Piano; Messrs. Levy, Lemken & Margulies*and *Mr. Michael Abrutyn*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Gaffey, Webb*<6 *McDermott*and *Messrs. Frohling & GauTkin*for the respondent.

December 12, 1967.

Denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50517

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN MANUEL MARTINEZ-CARRILLO, also known as

Manuel Martinez, also known as Juan Carrillo,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-1741-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Manuel

Martinez-Carrillo raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8

U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Long Only Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Long Only Commodity Series.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                    
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Long Only Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                      
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                       
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                           
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Long Only Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 26, 2008