T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HY AN G LAN LE E, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70912 A ge nc yN o. A 079- 800- 950 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H y a ng L a n L e e , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the de c i s i on of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ( “ B I A ” ) a f f i rm i ng a n I m m i gr a t i on Ju d g e ’s ( “I J ’s ” ) d e n ia l o f h e rap p lic a tio n f

o ra s y lu m a n dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l. 

# FI LED JU L 15 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70912 2 W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der by 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i al e v id e n c e a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n s , Cha w la v. H older , 599 F . 3d 998, 1001 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 1 0 ) , a n dd e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. L e e ’ s c l a i m f

orr e l i e f i n he ra s y l um appl i c a t i on a nd a the rm e r i t s he a r i ng di ff er ed si gn i fi cant l y f

rom the cl ai m for r el i ef

she pre se nt ed t o the as ylum offi ce r du ri ng her c re di bl e f

ear i nt ervi ew . W e r ej ec tL ee ’ s c on t ent i on thatthe B IA im p r o p e r lyr e lie do n th e c r e d ib le f e a rin te rv ie w to f

in dh e rn o t c r e d ib le . See L iv. A s h c r o ft , 3 7 8 F .3 d9 5 9 , 9 6 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ; c f . S i n g h v . I

NS , 292 F . 3d 1017, 1022 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( c onc l udi ng tha ta n a i rports t a t e m e ntl a c ke d s uf f i c i e nti ndi c i aof r e l i abi l i tya nd a c c ur a c yon i t s ow n t o s upporta n a dve r s e c r e dibi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on be c aus e the r e w a s e vi de nc e of tr a ns l a t i on pr obl e m s a nd no e vi de nc e of how the i n t erv i ew w as co n du ct ed ). S u b st an t i al ev i d en ce su p p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s ad v erse c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n b a s e do n th is in c o n s is te n t a c c o u n t o f h e rc la im , se e S in g h - Ka u rv . A s h c r o

ft , 1 8 3 F . 3 d1 1 4 7 , 1 1 4 9 -5 0 (9 th C i r. 1 9 9 9 ) (“ [t ] h e co u rtm u st up h o ldth e B I A ’s f

in d in g s u n le s s th e e v id e n c e p r e s e n te dw o u ldc o m p e l a r e a s o n ab le f

in d e ro f f a c t to r e a c h ac o n tr a ryr e s u lt” ) ; Kau r v . G on zales , 418 F . 3d 1061, 1067 ( 9th C i r . 2005) ( i nc ons i s t e nc i e s de pr i ve d c l a i m of r e qui s i t e “ r i ng of tru th ”), an dth e ag en cy reaso n ab l y rej ect edL ee’ s ex p l an at i o n fo r th e i n co n si st en cy, se e R i ve ra v. Mukasey , 50 8 F . 3d 12 71 , 12 75 (9th C i r. 20 07 ).08- 70912 3 I n the abs e nc e of

c r e di bl e t e s t i m ony , L e e ’ s c l a i m s f ora s y l um a nd w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l f

a il. Se e Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 34 8 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 56 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .