alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: JULY 16, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AIRLINE TRANSPORT PROFESSIONALS, INC. 

Respondent 

Docket No. FAA-2011-0288 

(Federal Aviation Administration) 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AIRLINE TRANSPORT PROFESSIONALS, INC. 

Respondent 

Docket No. FAA-2011-0289 

(Federal Aviation Administration) 

NOTICE OF PREHEARING TELEPHONE CONFERENCE 

j l \ ,,-,. l ""' 

l . .·-\ • .,'· i j 

A Prehearing Telephone Conference for the captioned cases is scheduled on Friday, 

August 8, 2014, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Time. All parties should be prepared to discuss all issues 

and facts at issue. Pursuant to Section 556 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. · 

§ 556(c)(8), each party shall be represented by someone who has authority to negotiate 

concerning resolution of all issues in controversy. Any documents that have been exchanged and 

that have not already been provided to the Judge should be provided by the Claimant and 

received in this office no later than 5:00p.m., Eastern Time, July 24,2014. The parties shall 

access the Conference by dialing 202-493-2343 at the appointed time. 
SERVED: JULY 16, 2014 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVED: JULY 16, 2014 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2011-0288 & FAA-2011-0289 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

· 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Jeffrey R. Ludwig, Esq., Respondent's Counsel 

Ludwig & Associates, P .A. 

5150 Belfort Road.S., Building 500 

Jacksonville, FL 32256 

TEL: 904-281-0145 

FAJ<: 904-451-0384 

Gerald A. Ellis, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30230 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. ·
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8287 

To require the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to issue 

a rule relating to stress capital buffer requirements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Mr. BARR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System to issue a rule relating to stress capital buffer 

requirements, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stress Testing Ac5 countability and Transparency Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RULEMAKING RELATED TO STRESS CAPITAL BUFF7 ER REQUIREMENTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

9 date of the enactment of this section, the Board of Gov10 ernors of the Federal Reserve System (in this Act referred 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8287 IH

1 to as the ‘‘Board’’) shall issue a rule to establish any mod2 els, assumptions, formulas, or other decisional methodolo3 gies that are used to determine any component or sub4 component of the stress capital buffer requirement for a 

5 bank holding company. 

6 (b) CHANGES.—The Board may only make changes 

7 to the rule issued under subsection (a) through notice and 

8 comment rulemaking. 

9 (c) STRESS CAPITAL BUFFER REQUIREMENT DE10 FINED.—The term ‘‘stress capital buffer requirement’’ has 

11 the meaning given the term in section 225.8(c) of title 

12 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 

13 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING RELATING TO STRESS TESTING. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning in the first calendar 

15 year after the date of the enactment of this section, the 

16 Board shall, not less than 30 days before conducting a 

17 stress test pursuant to section 165(i) of the Financial Sta18 bility Act of 2010, issue a rule to establish each scenario 

19 used to be used in such stress test. 

20 (b) PROHIBITION.—The Board may not, by rule or 

21 otherwise, subject any nonbank financial company to a cli22 mate-related stress test using the authority provided in 

23 section 165(i) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 8287 IH

1 SEC. 4. GAO REPORT. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the 

3 United States shall, every 3 years, conduct a study and 

4 submit a report to the Congress with respect to the stress 

5 tests conducted by the Board under section 165(i) of the 

6 Financial Stability Act of 2010 in the 3 most recent cal7 endar years. 

8 (b) CONTENTS.—The report submitted to the Con9 gress under subsection (a) shall— 

10 (1) evaluate whether the stress tests are suffi11 ciently robust and promote preparedness; and 

12 (2) consider whether the stress tests adequately 

13 identify salient risks to— 

14 (A) the safety and soundness of the 

15 nonbank financial institutions subjected to 

16 stress tests; and 

17 (B) the stability of the United States fi18 nancial system. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
December 20, 1940

No. 45040.

#### Protest 727719-G of W. R. Grace & Co.

Abstract 44772. Application by plaintiffs for rehearing granted.
##### 



MSW ENERGY HOLDINGS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Unaudited, in thousands of dollars)
 For the Six
    
    
    For the Period From
    
    
    
    For the Period FromMonths Ended
    
    
    June 25 through
    
    
    
    January 1 throughJune 30, 2006
    
    
    June 30, 2005
    
    
    
    June 24, 2005EARNINGS:Pre-tax income (loss) from
continuing operations before
minority interests
    
    $
    33,580
    
    
    $
    2,662
    
    
    
    $
    (2,901
    )Add:Fixed charges
    
    
    27,016
    
    
    
    1,074
    
    
    
    
    31,517Earnings, as adjusted
    
    $
    60,596
    
    
    $
    3,736
    
    
    
    $
    28,616FIXED CHARGES:Interest expense
    
    $
    27,016
    
    
    $
    1,074
    
    
    
    $
    31,517Fixed charges
    
    $
    27,016
    
    
    $
    1,074
    
    
    
    $
    31,517RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES:
    
    
    2.24
    x
    
    
    3.48
    x
    
    
    
    0.91
    x
 43
Before the First Division,

March 15, 1944

No. 49255.

#### Protests 946065-G, etc., of Weiss & Biheller Merchandise Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the glass reflectors are similar to those the subject of Abstract 48951 the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (c) was sustained.
No. 46204.

#### Protests 930607-G, etc., of Asbury Graphite Mills (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is amorphous graphite the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Starkey*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 118, C. D. 444). In accordance therewith the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 213 was sustained.
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Seifi Ghasemi, certifythat:

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form10-Q of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 21, 2007                    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ SEIFI  GHASEMI                    |   |
| Seifi Ghasemi                         |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
No. 46199.

#### Protest 23453-K of Bullocks, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the mufflers in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 44055 the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 was sustained.
June 9, 1947

No. 51772.

Suit 4553.

#### John *Barr*v. *United States.*

C. D. 1013 affirmed April 22, 1947. C. A. D. 362.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IntelGenx Technologies
Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Horst Zerbe, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|March 28, 2011 | By: | /s/Horst G. Zerbe                     | 
|-------------- | --- | ------------------------------------- | 
|               |     | Horst G. Zerbe                        | 
|               |     | President and Chief Executive Officer
|               |     | (Principal Executive Officer)        
|               |     |                                       | 
|               |     |                                       | 

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee--Open Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of commercial space transportation advisory committee 
open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a 
meeting of the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee 
(COMSTAC). The meeting will take place on Friday, May 18, 2007, 
starting at 8 a.m. at the Federal Aviation Administration Headquarters 
Building, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, in the Bessie 
Coleman Conference Center, located on the 2nd Floor. This will be the 
forty-fifth meeting of the COMSTAC.
    The proposed agenda for the meeting will feature the release of and 
briefings on the 2007 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts, a 
special presentation, a report on activities in FAA's Office of 
Commercial Space Transportation (AST), and COMSTAC Working Group 
reports. An agenda will be posted on the FAA Web site at http://ast.faa.gov. Meetings of the COMSTAC Working Groups (Technology and 
Innovation, Reusable Launch Vehicle, Risk Management, and Launch 
Operations and Support) will be held on Thursday, May 17, 2007. For 
specific information concerning the times and locations of the working 
group meetings, contact the Contact Person listed below.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
inform the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Parker (AST-100), Office of the 
Commercial Space Transportation, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 
331, Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-3674; E-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84e6f6e1eae0e5aaf4e5f6efe1f6c4e2e5e5aae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="36544453585257184657445d53447650575718515940">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued in Washington, DC, March 13, 2007.
Patricia Grace Smith,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
 [FR Doc. E7-5184 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8296 

To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to require Federal 

agencies to submit to the Comptroller General of the United States 

a report on rules that are revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or 

otherwise made ineffective. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Mr. BENTZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to require 

Federal agencies to submit to the Comptroller General 

of the United States a report on rules that are revoked, 

suspended, replaced, amended, or otherwise made ineffective. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GAO Database Mod5 ernization Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8296 IH

1 SEC. 2. RULES NO LONGER IN EFFECT. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 801(a)(1) of title 5, 

3 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

4 following: 

5 ‘‘(D) For any rule submitted under subparagraph 

6 (A), if the Federal agency promulgating the rule, in whole 

7 or in part, revokes, suspends, replaces, amends, or other8 wise makes the rule ineffective, or the rule is made ineffec9 tive for any other reason, the Federal agency shall submit 

10 to the Comptroller General a report containing— 

11 ‘‘(i) the title of the rule; 

12 ‘‘(ii) the Federal Register citation for the rule, 

13 if any; 

14 ‘‘(iii) the date on which rule was submitted to 

15 the Comptroller General; and 

16 ‘‘(iv) a description of the provisions of the rule 

17 that are being revoked, suspended, replaced, amend18 ed, or otherwise made ineffective.’’. 

19 (b) SUNSET.—Effective on the date that is 6 years 

20 after the date of enactment of this Act, section 801(a)(1) 

21 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking sub22 paragraph (D), as added by subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,688]


Lego Systems, Inc. Including Former On-Site Leased Workers of 
Adecco USA, Inc. Currently Employed With Staff Management, Enfield, CT; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on January 16, 2007, applicable to workers of 
LEGO Systems, Inc., including on-site leased workers of Staff 
Management, Enfield, Connecticut. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on February 7, 2007 (72 FR 5748).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in the assembly of LEGO toy model kits.
    New information shows that in February 2006, the leased workers of 
Adecco USA, Inc., employed on-site at the Enfield, Connecticut location 
of LEGO Systems, Inc., became employees of Staff Management due to a 
change in contracting firms.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers employed at LEGO Systems, Inc., Enfield, Connecticut who were 
adversely affected by a shift in production to Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,688 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of LEGO Systems, Inc., including former on-site 
leased workers of Adecco USA, Inc., currently employed with Staff 
Management, Enfield, Connecticut, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after January 2, 2006, through 
January 16, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to 
apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 
of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of March 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-5238 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Christian Brule, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sunergy, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sunergy, Inc.



|                       |     |                                                                                    
|---------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  August 14, 2007 | By: | /s/ Christian Brule                                                                
|                       |     | Christian Brule, President, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer
No. 47956.

#### Protest 844177-G of Charles Hardy, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial the plaintiff offered in evidence reports of the collector and the customs inspector. It appeared that the importation consisted of 45 casks of aluminum scrap. The sampler’s report stated “No markings to indicate the country of origin of contents” but there appeared a supplemental report by him stating “Find 5 casks with France barely visible the remainder are illegible or show no markings.” The report also shows that the importer was required to mark the casks with the legend “Product of France” before they were released from customs custody. An inspection of the notes of liquidation on the entry indicated that the collector did not assess the marking duty on the *3825 bales which bore the word “France.” On the authority of Abstracts 39005 and 42585 the court held that as to the 40 bales upon which the marking was illegible or which contained no marking, the collector acted legally in assessing the marking duty, and further that no marking duty should be or was assessed on the 5 bales on which the word “France” was visible. The protest was overruled, in all respects.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Terence Yap, the Chief Financial Officer of
CHINA SECURITY & SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY that:

| | 1. | The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report"), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      the Company.                                                         

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 26th day of April 2010.

/s/ Terence
YapTerence Yap Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc. and
will be retained by China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---