AFS-11-290-E May 19, 2011

Exemption No. 8058D Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2003-14242

Captain William Yeager Vice President of Flight Operations World Airways, Inc.

101 World Drive Peachtree City, GA 30269

Dear Captain Yeager:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8058, as amended. It explains the basis for our deci sion, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 26, 2011, y ou petitioned the Federal Avia tion Administration (FAA) on behalf of World Airways, Inc. (WAI), for an extension of Exemption No. 8058, as amended. That exemption from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Re gulations allows WAI to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman or aircrew program designee for an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in § 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing.

In your petition, you indicate that there has b een no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be de trimental to WAI.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justifica tion for the issuance of Exemption No. 8058, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemp tion and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. A WAI check airman or aircrew progra m designee may conduc t a PIC observation in place of an FAA inspector when––

a. The Administrator preapproves that substitution for each observation of a qualifying PIC candidate, thus reserving first right of refusal to the FAA in each case. WAI, therefore, must contact an appropriate FAA office, in each instance, before substituting that check airman or aircrew program designee;

b. The qualifying PIC candi date has completed no less than 10 hours of supervised operating experience (OE) and accomplished no fewer than two takeoffs and landings; and

c. The qualifying PIC candidate is performing PIC duties during a complete flight leg, including flightdeck preparation, before starting engines checklist, taxi, takeoff, all other flight phases, landing, taxi, and securing checklist.

2. Each WAI check airman or aircrew prog ram designee conductin g a PIC observation in place of an FAA inspector must––

a. Be approved by the Administrat or to conduct the observation;

b. Have served as a check airman or airc rew program designee for WAI for no less than 6 months; and

c. Not supervise the OE or conduct the initial line check for the qualifying

PIC candidate being observed.3

3. WAI must maintain student, check airma n, and aircrew program designee records that demonstrate compliance with the c onditions and limitations of this exemption.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8058, as amended, to May 31, 2013, unless sooner supe rseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service