alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Seifi Ghasemi, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 12, 2005           |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ SEIFI GHASEMI                    |   |
| Seifi Ghasemi                        |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### FRANKLIN T. CONDIT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DiRECTOR OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 98 *N. J. Super.*295.

*Mr. Charles J. Kahwaty*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Burton G. Pariser*for the respondent.

February 27, 1968.

Denied.
No. 47943.

#### Protests 64331-K/12407, etc., of S. H. Kress & Co. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the articles consist of figures in chief value of plaster of paris, similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Okuda*(23 C. C. P. A. 46, T. D. 47713) and Abstract 47064, the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 205 (e) was sustained.
Exhibit 32.10

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Managed Futures Index Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                        
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                      
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund



|                                                                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                          
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                           
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                               
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                          
|Date: November 13, 2007
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS JOHN ROBINSON, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Sherwin Drobner*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Guy W. Cctlissi*and *Mr. Harold N. Springstead*for the respondent.

April 30, 1968.

Denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Concentra Operating Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel
J. Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Daniel J. Thomas
--------------------
Daniel J. Thomas
Chief Executive Officer
March 27, 2003
No. 50538.

#### Protest 42741-K/89644 of American Hospital Supply Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the *282invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
----

**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     I, Horst Zerbe, Chief Executive Officer of the IntelGenx Technologies Corp. (the "Registrant"), certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial  statements,  and other  financial information  included  in this  annual  report, fairly  present  in all material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for,  the  periods  presented  in this annual report;

     4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e))  for the registrant and we have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material  information relating to the  Registrant,   including  its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b)  evaluated  the   effectiveness  of  the  Registrant's disclosure  controls and  procedures  and  presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c)  disclosed  in this report any change in the  Registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most  recent  fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected, or  is reasonably  likely to  materially  affect,  the  Registrant's  internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors  and the audit committee of the Registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing  the equivalent function):

         a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or operation of internal  control over financial reporting which are reasonably  likely to  adversely  affect  the  Registrant's  ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in  the  Registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  March 29, 2007

/s/   Horst Zerbe----------------------------------

Horst ZerbeChief Executive Officer

----
Before the First Division,

March 21, 1950

No. 54135.

#### Dr. Halfdan Hebo *v.*United States,

protest 148924-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHNNY WATSON, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Peter Murray, Mr. Richard Newman*and *Miss Cynthia M. Jacob*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Joseph P. Lordi*and *Mr. Alan BiTber*for the respondent.

May 28, 1968.

Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 57 (Monday, March 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14092-14093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5456]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-46-000]

Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., Barclays Bank, Plc; Notice of 
Petition for Declaratory Order

March 20, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 15, 2007, Morgan Stanley Capital Group 
Inc. and Barclays Bank, Plc (collectively ``Petitioners'') filed a 
petition of declaratory order concerning delivery obligations under 
certain wholesale power contracts in markets operated by Midwest 
Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (``MISO'') and PJM 
Interconnection, LLC (``PJM''). The Petitioners request the Commission 
to intervene as it has done in other markets that have transitioned to 
Locational

[[Page 14093]]

Marginal Pricing (``LMP'') or nodal pricing and resolve issues 
concerning the parties' delivery obligations under so-called ``Seller's 
Choice'' contracts. The requested determination is needed in light of 
the subsequent introduction of LMP into the MISO market and the 
integration of the former Alliance RTO Companies into the nodal 
pricing-based PJM market.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 16, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-5456 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
From: Parker, Barrett

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 3:25 PM

To: Rosenthal, Steven < rosenthal.steven@epa.gov >

Subject: MATS RTC that could help attached

Steve:

Attached are 3 responses to comments from the MATS Response to Comment Documents that you may find helpful in

reminding the source that monitoring and maintaining good control device operating can go a long way in meeting the

emissions limit.

Note that our rules have a mixture of confidence levels, e.g., 97.5% for CAMR, 99.9% for CO for Boiler MACT, and 99%

for MATS. Currently, 99% is favored.

Finally, you may want to copy Chuck French, Phil Murine’s supervisor, in your request for additional help from

RTI. Chuck may be asking Phil about the money spent on other projects.

Barrett
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2573

_____________________________
B RUCE K EVIN G REEN , J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Cou rt for Duval County

. Waddell A. Wallace , Judge

. May 7 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , B ILBREY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.3 31

.

_____________________________

Bruce Kevin Green, Jr., pro se
, Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.1



FastenTech, Inc. and Subsidiaries



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the FastenTech, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Ronald B. Kalich, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael R.
Elia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |              |  |     |  |                        
|----- |  | ------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | May 16, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Ronald B. Kalich   
|      |  |              |  |     |  | Ronald B. Kalich       
|      |  |              |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|      |  |              | 
|Date: |  | May 16, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael R. Elia    
|      |  |              |  |     |  | Michael R. Elia        
|      |  |              |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
|      |  |              |  |     |  | FastenTech, Inc.       



36
No. 45031.

#### Protest 17248-K/88939 of Premier Peat Moss Corporation (Chicago).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Peat Import Corp.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 181, C. D. 319) the claim for free entry under paragraph 1685 was sustained.
<Page>



EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-33974) pertaining to the Apropos Technology, Inc.
2000 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the Apropos Technology, Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of 2000, of our report dated January 31, 2002, except for Note 13,
as to which the date is February 26, 2002 and for Note 3, as to which the date
is March 6, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Apropos Technology, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2001.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 2002
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-30397

Conference Calendar

 

DELVIN CRAIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CV-3776-E

- - - - - - - - - -

October 26, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Delvin Crain, Louisiana prisoner # 91405, appeals the

district court’s denial of his motion to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) on appeal following the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action as time-barred. By moving for IFP status, Crain is

challenging the district court’s certification that IFP status

should not be granted on appeal because his appeal is frivolous

and is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d

197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).
No. 01-30397

-2-

Crain has failed to present a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. 

Accordingly, the district court’s order certifying that the

appeal is frivolous is upheld. Crain’s request for IFP status is

DENIED, his motion entitled “writ of certiorari” is DENIED, and

his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202

& n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a

“strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as does the

district court’s dismissal. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d

383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Crain is warned that if he

accumulates one more “strike” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he

may not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal

filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless

he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g).

MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS

WARNING ISSUED.
#### MERCHANTS INDEMNITY CORPORATION OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VICTORY IRON WORKS, INC., MARTIN EDSON, Jr., DEFENDANTS, JOHN R. HENCHES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued April 20, 1964

Decided June 5, 1964.

*365
      *Mr. Seymour M. Karas*argued the cause lor the appellant.

*Mr. H. Curtis Meanor*argued the cause lor the respondent *(Messrs. Lamb, Blaise, Hutchinson & Dunne,*attorneys; Mr. William Y. Breslin, of counsel).

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division.

*For affirmance*— Chief Justice Weifteaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eeafcis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettifo and HafeMAF — U

*For reversal*— None.
No. 51060.

#### Protests 78926-K, etc., of Johnson Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of oatmeals or oatmeal saucers and puree cups or chowder cups the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Copeland & Thompson, Inc.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833) and *Johnson Bros.*v. *United States*(15 id. 113, C. D. 955). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.