alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip NavigationUSGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Woods Hole Science Center
GIS Compilation of Data Collected from the Pulley Ridge Deep Coral Reef Region OF 2005-1089
OF       2005-1089

Disc       Contents

Introduction

Surficial       Geology

GIS/Visualization

Data       Catalog

References       Cited

Acknowledgments

Contacts
Contacts:
For current contact information: http://coastal.er.usgs.gov/pulley-ridge/

VeeAnn A. CrossU.S. Geological Survey 384       Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598508-548-8700       x2251vatnipp@usgs.gov

David C. TwichellU.S. Geological Survey384       Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598

Robert B. HalleyU.S. Geological Survey600 4th       Street SouthSt. Petersburg, FL 33701-4846

Kate T. CiembronowiczU.S. Geological Survey600       4th Street SouthSt. Petersburg, FL 33701-4846

Bret D. JarrettCollege of Marine       ScienceUniversity of South Florida140 Seventh Avenue SouthSt.       Petersburg, FL 33701 

Erika S. Hammar-KloseU.S. Geological Survey384       Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598

Al C. HineCollege of Marine ScienceUniversity       of South Florida140 Seventh Avenue SouthSt. Petersburg, FL       33701

Dave F. NaarCollege of Marine       ScienceUniversity of South Florida140 Seventh Avenue SouthSt.       Petersburg, FL 33701 

Stan D. LockerCollege of Marine       ScienceUniversity of South Florida140 Seventh Avenue SouthSt.       Petersburg, FL 33701 
Skip       Navigation
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and       Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL:       woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2005-1089/htmldocs/contacts.htmPage       Contact Information: WHSC       WebmasterThis page last modified on Monday, 14-Jan-2013 12:50:16       EST
No. 54731.

#### Bak Chun Tong et al. *v.*United States,

protests 597900-G, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained as follows: (1) Bak hop, lotus nuts, sui sit, yuk chuk, wai san, sar sum, Io hon qua, mok qua, and *289yuen yuk assessed at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 775 and paragraph 752, or at 50 percent under paragraph 774 as vegetables or fruits, prepared, or at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as drugs, advanced, stipulated to be the same as the merchandise passed upon in *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs; (2) merchandise assessed as milled rice at *2%*cents per pound under paragraph 727, similar to the broken rice the subject of Abstract 48704, was held dutiable at five-eighths of 1 cent per pound under said paragraph, the portions of the broken rice being as follows: In protest 957750-G, for the 200-bag lot, 1.1 percent; for the 100-bag lot, 1.2 percent; for the 50-bag lot, 1 percent; and in all other instances, 2.2 percent; (3) merchandise classified as shelled almonds under paragraph 756, the same as the apricot kernels involved in Abstract 34104, was held dutiable at at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 762; (4) merchandise assessed at 50 percent under paragraph 774 as vegetables in their natural state, the same as those the subject of Abstract 29022 and *Quong Yu Wo*v. *United States*(68 Treas. Dec. 668, T. D. 48003), was held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 775 as vegetables, prepared or preserved; (5) birds’ nests assessed at 20 percent under paragraph 1558, similar to those the subject of *Quong Lee & Co.*v. *United States*(20 C. C. P. A. 192, T. D. 45981), were held dutiable at 10 percent under said paragraph as nonenumerated unmanufactured articles; and (6) birds, prepared or preserved, assessed at 10 cents per pound under paragraph 712, the same as the ducks in oil passed upon in *Wa Chong Co.*v. *United States*(61 Treas. Dec. 1118, T. D. 45695), were held dutiable under said paragraph upon the basis of a weight, excluding that of the oil, the weight of the oil in these instances being as noted on the involved invoices by the customs examiner.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Tammie A. Quinlan, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, and its results of operations for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | /s/ Tammie A. Quinlan                                   
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  |  |  | Name: Tammie A. Quinlan                                 
|                      |  |  |  | Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Katherine A. Smith, Appellant, v Bellmore Merrick Central High School District, Respondent.

[634 NYS2d 402]

—In an action to recover damages for termination of employment without just cause, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), entered August 4, 1994, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the plaintiff failed to serve a notice of claim, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendant summary judgment dismissing the complaint *(see,*Education Law § 3813 [1]; *Philson Painting Co. v Board of Educ.,*133 AD2d 619). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 21.1**

GeoPharma, Inc. 

List of Subsidiaries March 31, 2008 

BREAKTHROUGH ENGINEERED NUTRITION, INC., a Florida corporation 

GO2PBMSERVICES, INC., a Florida corporation 

BELCHER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Florida corporation 

IHP MARKETING, INC., a Florida corporation 

BREAKTHROUGH MARKETING, INC., a Florida corporation 

BELCHER CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation 

LIBI LABS, INC, aFlorida Corporation 

EZ-MED COMPANY, a Florida Corporation 

DYNAMIC HEALTH PRODUCTS, INC., a Florida Corporation
EXHIBIT 10.1

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Ministry of Energy Mines and Petroleum Resources

RECORD OF 4 POST CLAIM - MINERAL TENURE ACT

(Section 27)

|Vernon___________________________________ | 413322__________________________________  
|----------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|Mining Division                           | Tenure No.                                
|_____________________________________     | August 19, 2004___________________________
|Gold Commissioner                         | Date of Record                            

_____________________________________________________________________________________

APPLICATION TO RECORD A 4 POST CLAIM

I, Stephen Kenwood, Name of Locator, of 13629 Marine Drive, White Rock, BC, V4B 1A3, (604) 535-8146, Client No. 134185, hereby apply for record of a 4 Post Claim for the location as outlined on the attached copy of mineral titles NTS map sheets 82L025, in the Nicola Mining Division.

ACCESS

Describe how you gained access to the location, include reference to roads, trails, topographic features, permanent landmarks and a description of the legal post location.

From Vernon, drive about 10 kilometres east on Highway 6 to Lavington, head north for 3 kilometres on the main Forestry access road and then west for about 8 kilometres toward Becker Lake. The Legal Corner Post is located 200 metres south of the southeast corner of Becker Lake.

GPS Co-ordinates taken of posts: Yes [ ] No [x] If yes, complete information chart on reverse.

TAG INFORMATION

I have securely fastened the metal identification tag embossed "LEGAL CORNER POST" to the legal corner post (or "witness post") and impressed this information on the tag:

TAG No. 246614 LEGAL CORNER POST

|CLAIM NAME     | CRUZ           
|-------------- | ---------------
|LOCATOR        | Stephen Kenwood
|FMC No.        | 134185         
|DATE COMMENCED | August 19, 2004
|TIME           | 10:00 am       
|DATE COMPLETED | August 19, 2004
|TIME           | 4:30 pm        

- 2 -



Number of Claim Units
N 5 S__ E 4 W 5

IDENTIFICATION POSTS NOT PLACED WERE:

BECAUSE:

If a witness post was placed for the legal corner post:

Bearing from witness post to true position of legal corner post is _______degrees at a distance of ______ metres.

NOTE: Legal Corner Post can be witnessed only if it was not feasible to place any posts.

ACKNOWLEGEMENT

I have complied with all the terms and conditions of the Mineral Tenure Act and Regulation pertaining to the location of 4 post claims and have attached a plan of the location on which the positions of the legal corner post and all other corner posts (and witness and identification post, if applicable) are indicated. The tag information supplied above is the identical information that I impressed upon the tag affixed to the applicable post when I located this claim and this information is true and correct.

/s/ "Stephen Kenwood"
Stephen Kenwood
Signature of Locator

SEAL

RECEIVED
SUB-RECORDER
VANCOUVER, BC
AUGUST 20, 2004
Recording Stamp
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 4, 2022

No. 04-21-00518-CV

BULVERDE VILLAGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Appellant

v.

BULVERDE VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a/k/a The Point,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI03243

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Appellee filed its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Lack of Authority of 

Appellant POA to Appeal on December 1, 2021. The motion to dismiss is carried with the 

appeal.

It is so ORDERED on February 4, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. M OHAM M E D ISM AIL HOSSAIN, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-50587

D.C . No. 5:13-c r-00032-JGB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Je sus G. B e rna l, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d April 13, 2016 ** B e fore : FARRIS, TALLM AN, a n d B YB EE, C i rc uit Judge s. M oha m m e d Ism a il Hossain a

ppe a ls from the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 40-m onth c onc urre nt se nte nc e s im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tions for c onspira c y , in viola tion of 18 U.S.C . § 371, a nd ille ga l tra ffic king in food sta

m p be ne fits, in viola

tion of 7 U.S.C . § 2024(b). Pursua nt to Ande rs v . 

# FIL ED APR 18 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hossa in’ s c ounse l ha s file d a

brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l of re c o rd. W e have p rovide d Hossa i n the opportunity to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d. Our indepe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 5 0 5 8 7 2
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v LESLIE C. HIATT, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

18 USCMA 183, 39 CMR 183

No. 21,633

March 14, 1969

*Lieutenant David E. Miller,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Captain Charles E. Patterson,*USMCR, was on the pleadings for Ap-pellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

We granted review in this case to determine whether Article 38(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 838, had been complied with. The record reflects that, at the outset, a *pro forma*inquiry was made to determine whether the accused had been advised of his rights concerning counsel as set forth in Article 38(b) of the Code.

In United States v Donohew, 18 USCMA 149, 39 CMR 149, decided March 7, 1969, we. held that this type of *184inquiry constituted *minimal*compliance with Article 38(b). However, as we stated in *Donohew:*

> *“We*believe the seriousness of the situation dictates that *the record should contain the accused’s -personal response to direct questions incorporating each of the elements of Article 38(b), as well as his understanding of his entitlement thereunder. “Accordingly, the record in each special or general court-martial convened more than thirty days after the date of this*[Donohew] *opinion should reflect this requirement has been met.*United States v Rinehart, 8 USCMA 402, 24 CMR 212.” [Emphasis supplied in part.]

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8257 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from implementing a withdrawn 

rule relating to restricted access to the Washington Channel in Washington, DC, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2024 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from implementing 

a withdrawn rule relating to restricted access to the 

Washington Channel in Washington, DC, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington Channel 

5 Public Access Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF RULE. 

7 The Secretary of the Army may not finalize, imple8 ment, or enforce the withdrawn rule entitled ‘‘Washington 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8257 IH

1 Channel, Fort McNair, Washington, DC; Restricted 

2 Area’’, published by the Department of the Army on De3 cember 29, 2020 (Docket No. COE–2019–0010; 85 Fed. 

4 Reg. 85570), or any other rule that restricts public access 

5 to the Washington Channel in Washington, DC. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         389,401                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  28,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               389,401                  28,704
<PP&E>                                          11,125                   2,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,728                   1,968
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 396,798                  29,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          881,208               1,439,368
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       6
<COMMON>                                           668                     359
<OTHER-SE>                                   (538,252)             (1,610,045)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   396,798                  29,688
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,664,280                 571,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,136                  56,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,701,416)               (628,247)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,701,416)               (628,247)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 487,009               (310,661)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,214,407)               (938,908)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.21)                   (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)                   (.28)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIRECTV, INC.,

NO. CIV. S-04-2533 FCD/KJM

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND

DISPOSITION

ROBERT CESSNA, 

Defendant.

____________________________________/

Pursuant to the representations of plaintiff’s counsel in the above action the court has

determined that this case has settled. 

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 160, dispositional documents are to be

filed on or before August 1, 2005. All dates set in this matter are hereby VACATED.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL AS WELL AS ANY

PARTY OR PARTIES WHO CAUSE NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 29, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02533-FCD-KJM Document 8 Filed 06/29/05 Page 1 of 1
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
PENTAIR WATER POOL A ND SPA, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC., HAYWARD POOL PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants

- Appellees

______________________
2015

- 1722

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:11

- cv

- 10280

- GW

MRW, Judge Geo rge H. Wu.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
M ARK B OLAND , Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by R AJA N. S ALIBA , G RANT S IMON S HACKELFORD , K ENNETH J. B URCHFIEL

.
L EE C ARL B ROMBERG , McCarter & English, LLP, Bo ston, MA, argued for defendants

- appellees. Also represen ted by K EITH E. T OMS , L ORI J ANE S HYAVITZ , A MY J OYT INDELL ; S COTT S. C HRISTIE , M ATTHEW A DAM S KLAR , Newark, NJ.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE , O’M ALLEY , and H UGHES , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
No. 49728.

#### Petition 6291-R of Carey & Skinner, Inc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It appeared from the testimony that these volumes were sent to persons who had purchased a complete set of books; that they were printed in England and sent to Canada from whence they were imported into the United States; and that the publishers started the shipment of the set of books comprising the encyclopaedia in about 1939 and as the new volumes were compiled they were sent to the various purchasers. The importation being an unusual one, in that the books were entered under a period of time, and the testimony- showing that the importer endeavored to obtain information as to the proper dutiable value of the index volumes, the court was of the opinion that the importer was without intent to defraud the Government or to deceive its officials. The petition was therefore granted.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Frontier Balanced
Fund, a Series of Frontier Funds on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Frontier Balanced Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Patrick J. Kane                                                                                                                                   | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Patrick J. Kane                                                                                                                                       | 
|Chairman, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Managing Member of Frontier Fund Management LLC, the Managing Owner of Frontier Funds | 



June 24, 2019
#### Edward B. Collins, *Respondent, v.*Henry Rockwood, *Appel*lant.

Motion denied. *(Roe*v. *Hansen, 5*Lans., 304.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Danton Duncan, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 462]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.), rendered June 9, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 41⁄2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that the court’s jury charge deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. If we were to review it, we would find that the trial court’s instruction to the jury not to speculate did not improperly convey that they were to ignore the absence of proof of defendant’s fingerprints on the drug vials, buy money in his possession, and other purported gaps in the People’s case, but simply that they were not to go beyond the evidence in theorizing about the reasons for the gaps *(compare, People v Rodriguez,*141 AD2d 382, 385). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.