alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8241 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8241

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require the Chairman of 
 the Securities and Exchange Commission to semiannually testify before 
       Congress with regard to the activities of the Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2024

Mrs. Wagner (for herself, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. Meuser, Mr. Huizenga, and 
  Mr. Emmer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require the Chairman of 
 the Securities and Exchange Commission to semiannually testify before 
       Congress with regard to the activities of the Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SEC Transparency Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. SEMIANNUAL TESTIMONY TO CONGRESS REGARDING ACTIVITIES OF THE 
              SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

    Section 4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78d) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(l) Semiannual Testimony to Congress.--The Chairman of the 
Commission shall, not less than once every 6 months after the date of 
the enactment of this subsection, testify before the Committee on 
Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate on the activities of 
the Commission. At least once annually, the Commissioners shall join 
the Chairman with respect to testifying pursuant to the preceding 
sentence.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Joseph N. H. Walbridge, *Appellant,*for the Custody and care of Marguerite Walbridge, *v.*Florence S. Walbridge, *Respondent.*

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by Barnard, P. J.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23(I)

                                   Law Offices
                                 ALLAN M. LERNER
                           A Professional Association

                                                      Telephone: (954)563-8111
2888 East Oakland Park Boulevard                      Facsimile: (954)563-8522
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33306                        EMAIL: amlrwp@aol.com

                                October 16, 2000

Mr. Lesly Benoit
Chief Financial Officer
ISNI.net, Inc.
204 E. McKenzie St.
Unit D
Punta Gorda, FL 33950

RE:       FILING OF FORM 10K-SB FOR ISNI.NET, INC.

Gentlemen:

This opinion is submitted pursuant to applicable rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission with respect to the filing of Form 10K-SB for ISNI.Net,
Inc.(the "Company").

In my capacity as securities counsel to the Company., I have examined the
original, certified, conformed, or other copies of the Company's Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws provided to me by ISNI.Net. In all
such examinations, I have assumed the genuineness of all signatures on original
documents, and the conformity to originals or certified documents of all copies
submitted to me as conformed, photostat or other copies. In passing upon certain
corporate records and documents of ISNI.Net, Inc., I have necessarily assumed
the correctness and completeness of the statements made or included therein by
ISNI.Net., and I express no opinion thereon. Based upon and in reliance of the
foregoing, I hereby consent to the use of this opinion in the Form 10K-SB to be
filed with the Commission.

                                       /s/ Allan M. Lerner
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Allan M. Lerner, P.A.
(Reap. Dec. 10488)

#### Hurricane Import Company (Mojonier) et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 24065, etc.

(Decided April 16, 1963)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto, for decision upon stipulation, reading as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise and the issues involved in the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule “A” hereto 'attached and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Gitkin Co.,*A.R.D. 132, and that the record in the cited ease may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 2. That the involved merchandise was entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after February 27, 1958 and is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521).

> 3. At the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for exportation to the United States to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values, less the amounts marked “X” in red ink by the Examiner.

*446On the agreed facts and following the decision in the cited case, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise involved and that such values are the appraised values, less the amounts marked “X” in red ink by the examiner.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 10146)

#### James A. McCauley John C. Rogers & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 25497, etc.

(Decided January 23, 1962)

*F. Hastings Griffin, Jr.,*for the plaintiffs.

*William H. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule consists of a chemical known as MCPA, but more particularly described as hereinafter indicated. The parties have agreed that the correct basis of valuation is American selling price, as defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, or section 402a (g) of the said tariff act, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, depending upon the date of importation.

The parties have submitted the case for decision upon a stipulation, on the basis of which I find the American selling price to be as follows:

> Item Period Price

> 2-Methyl-4-phenoxy acetic 1955 to 6/8/56_ 950 per lb., net packed acid, 98.8%.

> Minimum assay_ 6/9/56 to end of 1959_880 per lb., net packed

Judgment will issue accordingly.
## FEB. 22. 2008 1 : 

### 33PIW DEP WASTE PREVENTION



## MassDEP Boston 1

## Winter St. 

## Boston, MA 02108 7m 

## Floor 

## Fax Number: 

## 617-556-1063 To: 

## From: 

## L17 27 2- 

# y6lg 

# 4 ; Re: ,YMc 

# N4( 

# *

Pages 

## (Including cover 

## page): 3 

## Date: 2/2z/o 

## d Message:Comparison 

### of Actual Emissions Versus Regulatory Umib &Lbfldd, LLC 

### Three Manidpal 

### Waste Combustors ScrubberPressure Drop 

### = Sto 7Inches Water 

### Column Pebruary 2007 --21fI Compliance 

### Tests


### Pd Limits

ppmv 

## - parts per million (dry, volume) m&dscrn- mbpms per dtysrandud cubic mem CO. SO>. t NO, aveqevalues wwe cecorded Iring (he ~TCG PCDDKDFtcsr nms w.c 

## - ins hes oC wau cahimn

504P-0703Pcbruvy 2007 2IH lest report -7- GamAir.oom, 

### FEB. 

### 22. 2008 1 : 

### 33PM DEP WASTE PREVENTION NO. 

### 3092 P. 

### 3

Table 

### 3-2(cant.) 

### Campmison 

### of Actual 

### Emisions Versus Regulatory Umits 

### June XI07 

# - 21H Compliance

### Test Fogram , Pion- VaUey 

### Ikemurce Recovery Fdty 

### ecoBprin@cld, 

### &LC Three Municipal Waste 

### Cambust9rs 

### MethdCompauent 

### Unrts 

### Test Average WEP 

### Allowable Emission ]Limit 

### ppmd at 

### 7% 02 ' 68-0 - 

### Sulfur DioxideJCEMS ppmvd at 

### 12% CQ 

### 11.6 29 

### pemvd at 7% 

## 62 14.0 

### Nitrogen OxidesICEMS ppmvd at 12%(2% 91.2 

# 1 ( ppmvdat7%Q 

# I 110.4 ppmvd at 12% CO~-- pacb pas,dillion(dry, volume) coriected to 12% C02 as rccordedby 

### PvRRFc-~MS ppmvd at 7% Oz 

# -parts pet million(dry, volume) cmecadto 7%4 

# J

CEMSdm recorded on 20 June 2007 durirlgdioxhKumM23-2 and M23-3 testnms (0800-1708) ppmvd at 7%Ozvaluto = [cardationfact^^ (1.2111 X Ippmvd at 12% C& vatues (see scotion 3.8)]


### 3.6 Total 

### Dioxins 

### and bans Test 

### Results Polychlorinated

### dibenzo-p-dioxins (acsD:t 

### and dibebzofuraus 

### @Q,F) test results are sum 

### in Table 

### 3-2

### aad shown 

### in further

### detail 

### m Appendix 

### B. Total 

### PCDDPCDF, the sum 

### of tetra 

### through octa dioxin 

### aad 

### furan isomers, avemged 5.06 ngidsan at 

### 7%

### Oz and 

### are 

### in compliance,with the 

### MADW limit of 30 nanograms per dry standard 

### cubic 

### maer corrected ta 7%sxygen. 

### The averagePCDD~CDF codcentration is 16.9 

### pacent of the MADEP limit. 3,7 

### Particulate Matter 

### Less Than 10 

### Mlcrons (PMLO) TestMta 

### PMlO tests were 

### conducted

### for informational 

### purposes only. 

### Presently 

### heMADEP does 

### not have a 

### regulatary Zimit 

### for 

### this particular pollutam 

### The averagePMlO concentration

### was 3,99 

### mgtdscm at 

### 7% Q,
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1893
JUAN L. STEWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GWALTNEY OF SMITHFIELD, LTD., Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1158) Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 18, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juan L. Steward, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Robert Stellman, BLUM, YUMKAS, MAILMAN, GUTMAN & DENICK, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district co urt's orders granting the Appellee summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motionfor appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Steward v. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. , No. CA-95- 1158 (E.D. Va. June 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO

         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
MARCH 31, 2004 (the "Report") of TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP. (the
"Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, PATRICK F. CONROY, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                                           /s/    Patrick F. Conroy
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Name: Patrick F. Conroy
                                       Date: May 13, 2004
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 The
        undersigned, Tony Philipp, the Chief Executive Officer and Paul Schmidt,
        the
        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of UPSNAP, INC. (the "Company"), DO
        HEREBY
        CERTIFY that:
 
 1.
 
        The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
        31,
        2007 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
 
        Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
        15th
        day of May 2007.
 
 
 /s/
        Tony Philipp
 Tony
        Philipp
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 (Principal
        Executive Officer)
 
 /s/
        Paul Schmidt
 Paul
        Schmidt
 Chief
        Financial Officer and Treasurer
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        UpSNAP, Inc. and will be retained by Upsnap, Inc. and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 46792.

#### Petition 5884-R of Hahn Dept. Stores Purchasing Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The petition was dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report of GEOPHARMA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Mihir K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mihir K. TanejaMihir K. TanejaChief Executive OfficerJune 29, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 77 (Monday, April 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 23740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09394]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2010-0086]

Notice of Availability of a Swine Brucellosis and Pseudorabies 
Proposed Action Plan

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments; reopening of 
the comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are reopening the comment period for a notice that made a 
proposed action plan describing a potential new approach to managing 
swine brucellosis and pseudorabies available for public review and 
comment. This action will allow interested persons additional time to 
prepare and submit comments.

DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before July 
22, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2010-0086-0001.
     Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to 
Docket No. APHIS-2010-0086, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, 
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
    Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may 
be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2010-
0086 or in our reading room, which is located in Room 1141 of the USDA 
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, 
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, 
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Troy Bigelow, National Center for 
Animal Health Programs, VS, APHIS, Federal Building Room 891, 210 
Walnut Street, Des Moines, IA 50309; (515) 284-4121.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 7, 2013, we published in the 
Federal Register (78 FR 9028-9029, Docket No. APHIS-2010-0086) a notice 
that made a proposed action plan describing a potential new approach to 
managing swine brucellosis and pseudorabies available for public review 
and comment.
    Comments on the notice were required to be received on or before 
April 8, 2013. We are reopening the comment period on Docket No. APHIS-
2010-0086 for an additional 90 days ending July 22, 2013 This action 
will allow interested persons additional time to prepare and submit 
comments. We will also consider all comments received between April 9, 
2013 (the day after the close of the original comment period) and the 
date of this notice.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of April 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-09394 Filed 4-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
```
# Map            Afghanistan.
No. 52669.

protest 913614-G (New York).

#### Charles Bruning Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of cotton cloth the same as that the subject of *Perseverance Import Corp.*v. *United States*(T. D. 49290), it was held that the merchandise in question is subject to additional duty under paragraph 924 only as to the actual weight of the cotton contained therein, exclusive of the weight of the sizing.
Exhibit 32.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Managed Futures Index
Series.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                          
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                              
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                            
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                             
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                 
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: May 12, 2010
EXHIBIT  99.1

                             BLUE MOON GROUP, INC.

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Blue Moon Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Muzio, the President and Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.


/s/  MICHAEL MUZIO
-----------------------------
Michael Muzio
President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
April 14, 2003
Before the Third Division,

June 10, 1959

No. 63148.

#### Schenley Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 129965-K (Philadelphia.).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 40230.

#### Protest 935205-G of General Concessions Corp. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

On the authority of Abstract 39565 the claim as to the so-called imitation metal watch was overruled. The carnival raffle cards are about *2%*by *%*of an inch in dimensions. It was held that the evidence did not overcome the presumption of correctness of the classification as articles of paper lithographically printed. *Fougera*v. *United States*(1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 146, T. D. 31208) cited. The protest was overruled. *United States*v. *Bullocks*(25 C. C. P. A. 381, T. D. 49465) followed.
SCWC

- 15

- 000034 2

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF H AWAI  I

STATE OF HAWAI  I

, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

vs.

RUDOLPH G. KING, JR.

, Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellee

.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP

- 15

- 000034 2 ; CR. NO. 14

- 1

- 1986 )

ORDER OF CORRECTION
(By: Pollack, J.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court,

filed December 13, 2016, is corrected as follows:

1. Footnote 5 is renumbered to 4

.

2. Footnote 6 is renumbered to 5.

3. Footnote 7 is renumbered to 6.

4. Footnote 8 is renumbered to 7.

5. Footnote 9 is renumbered to 8.

6. Footnote 10 is renumbered to 9.

7. Footnote 11 is renumbered to 10. Electronically Filed Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000342

22-DEC-2016

04:06 PM2 8. Footnote 12 is renumbered to 11.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these

changes.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, D ecember 22, 2016

.

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Associate Justice