alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10124)

#### Windsor Pen Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. WH-46575.

(Decided December 14, 1961)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*William E. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*550OliveR, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain cigarette lighters exported from Japan and entered at the port of New York.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is statutory export value, and that such value therefor is “the appraised unit value, less the buying commission stated in the invoice.”

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
-1-



    	 



    








    	-2-



    	 



    








    	-3-



    	 



    








    	-4-



    	 



    








    	-5-



    	 



    








    	-6-



    	 



    








    	-7-



    	 



    








    	-8-
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8360 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8360

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to deem any sunscreen 
           or cosmetic containing parabens to be adulterated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2024

  Mrs. Luna (for herself, Ms. Caraveo, and Mr. Nehls) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to deem any sunscreen 
           or cosmetic containing parabens to be adulterated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Toxic Chemicals in Cosmetics 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ADULTERATED SUNSCREEN AND COSMETICS CONTAINING PARABENS.

    (a) Sunscreen Containing Parabens.--Section 501 of the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 351) is amended by inserting 
after paragraph (j) the following:
    ``(k) If it is a drug that--
            ``(1) contains 1 or more active ingredients intended for 
        application to the skin of humans for purposes of absorbing, 
        reflecting, or scattering ultraviolet radiation; and
            ``(2) bears or contains parabens, including esters of 
        parahydroxybenzoic acid, which include methylparaben, 
        ethylparaben, propylparaben, butylparaben, isopropylparaben, 
        isobutylparaben, benzylparaben, phenylparaben, and 
        pentylparaben.''.
    (b) Cosmetics Containing Parabens.--Section 601 of the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 361) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(h) If it bears or contains parabens, including esters of 
parahydroxybenzoic acid, which include methylparaben, ethylparaben, 
propylparaben, butylparaben, isopropylparaben, isobutylparaben, 
benzylparaben, phenylparaben, and pentylparaben.''.
    (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
shall apply only with respect to drugs and cosmetics introduced or 
delivered for introduction into interstate commerce on or after the 
date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.11

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Frontier Dynamic Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Frontier Dynamic Series.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                     
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Dynamic Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                       
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                        
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                            
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund                                                                                                                
|Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Dynamic Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund                                                      

Date: May 12, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [OR-936-1310-07; HAG-07-0086; WAOR60869] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Meany Land & Exploration, Inc., for competitive oil and gas lease WAOR60869 for lands in Yakima County, Washington. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donna Kauffman, Land Law Examiner, Minerals Section, BLM Oregon/Washington State Office, PO Box 2965, Portland, Oregon 97208, (503) 808-6162. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee, Meany Land & Exploration, Inc., has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Bureau of Land Management for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice.                 

                    The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). Therefore, the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WAOR60869, effective October 1, 2006, subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and                           ( print page 13307)                        the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. No other valid lease has been issued affecting the lands.                 

Patrick H. Geehan, 

Chief, Minerals Section. 

[FR Doc. E7-5155 Filed 3-20-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
No. 60923.

#### Markel, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 224293-K (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed as untimely.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                             SUBSIDIARIES OF COMPANY

1. Viastar Distribution Group, Inc., a Nevada Corporation



Exhibit 23.1

November 15, 2004


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Armando C. Ibarra, Certified Public Accountants, APC consents to the
inclusion of our reports on the audited financial statements of Viastar Holdings
Corporation,  for the years ended  December 31, 2002 and June 30,  2003,  in any
filings that are  necessary  now or in the near future with the U.S.  Securities
and Exchange Commission.



Very truly yours,



/s/ARMANDO C. IBARRA, C.P.A.
------------------------------
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JOSEPH R. LEAMAN, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

16 USCMA 191, 36 CMR 347

No. 19,143

April 8, 1966

*Captain L. G. Bohlen,*USMC, argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. *Lieutenant John P. Meade,*USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel J. E. Hanthorn,*USMC, argued the cause for Appellee, United States. *Lieutenant Jean E. Van Slate,*USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

FeRguson, Judge:

In this separate trial by general court-martial, the accused contends that Colonel Andrew I. Lyman, ordinarily the Chief of Staff, Third Marine Division, was not in fact acting as Commanding Officer, Third Marine Division, and hence did not have the authority to review th'e record in the court-martial which tried him. See also United States v Leaman, 16 USCMA 189, 36 CMR 345, this day decided.

For the reasons stated in United States v Kugima, 16 USCMA 183, 36 CMR 339, this day decided, we find Colonel Lyman to have been the Commanding Officer, Third Marine Division, at the time he acted upon the record of trial in the accused’s case.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.
EX-23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

October 17, 2003

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
ViaStar Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
2451 W. Birchwood Avenue, Suite 105
Mesa, Arizona 85202

As the independent public accountants for ViaStar Holdings, Inc. we hereby consent to the incorporation in this Transition Report on Form 10-KSB of ViaStar Holdings, Inc, of our report dated October 17, 2003, regarding the June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, consolidated financial statements. We also consent to all other references to our company included in this annual report.

/s/Armando Ibarra, CPA - APC

Armando C. Ibarra, CPA - APC
Chula Vista, California
October 17, 2003
Exhibit 99.4


               Statement Under Oath of Principal Financial Officer
       Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings

I, Dennis M. O'Connor, state and attest that:

(1)  To the best of my knowledge,  based upon a review of the covered reports of
     M.B.A.  Holdings,  Inc.,  and,  except as  corrected or  supplemented  in a
     subsequent covered report:

     o    no covered report  contained an untrue statement of a material fact as
          of the end of the period  covered by such  report (or in the case of a
          report on Form 8-K or definitive  proxy  materials,  as of the date on
          which it was filed); and

     o    no covered  report  omitted to state a material fact necessary to make
          the statements in the covered  report,  in light of the  circumstances
          under which they were made, not misleading as of the end of the period
          covered  by such  report  (or in the case of a  report  on Form 8-K or
          definitive proxy materials, as of the date on which it was filed).

(2)  I have reviewed the contents of this  statement  with the  Company's  Audit
     Committee.

(3)  In this statement under oath, each of the following,  if filed on or before
     the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

     o    Annual Report on Form 10-K of M.B.A. Holdings, Inc. for the year ended
          October 31, 2003 filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission,
          File Number 1-9183,

     o    all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all definitive
          proxy materials of M.B.A. Holdings, Inc. filed with the Commission
          subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K identified above; and

     o    any amendments to any of the foregoing.


By: /s/ Dennis M. O'Connor
-------------------------------
Dennis M. O'Connor
February 10, 2005
                                              Subscribed and sworn to before me
                                              This 10 day of February 2005

                                              /s/ Marjorie Smith
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Notary Public
                                              My Commission Expires:
                                              March 18, 2008


                                       36
Order entered June 3 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00494
- CR DEREK A. NELSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. 416
- 80609
- 2014



### O RDER
We GRANT c ourt reporter LaTresta Ginyard’s May 27, 2016 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be due on July 15, 2016

.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell/Graham Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|



|                                                                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                     
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                         
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Campbell/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|

Date: November 26, 2008
Exhibit 99.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QT 5, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated:  February 20, 2004                  By: /s/ Roger N. Smith
                                              ----------------------
                                                   Roger N. Smith
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  February 20, 2004                  By: /s/ Larry Taylor
                                              ----------------------
                                                   Larry Taylor
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
ex10-37.htm


 

Exhibit 10.39

 

AMENDMENT TO THE
BPZ RESOURCES, INC.
2007 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

 

WHEREAS, BPZ Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted and maintains the BPZ Energy, Inc. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of June 4, 2007, to provide an opportunity for its eligible employees and certain independent contractors to earn long term incentive awards in consideration for their services;

 

WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to reserve additional shares for issuance under the Plan.

 

NOW THEREFORE, effective as of June 20, 2014, the Plan is hereby amended by replacing Section 7(a) with the following new Section 7(a) that shall read as follows:

 

“(a) Maximum Shares. Subject to adjustment as provided in this Section 7, there is hereby reserved for issuance under the Plan up to 12,000,000 shares of Stock of the Company.”

 

*     *     *

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BPZ Resources, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representatives on this 20th day of June, 2014.

 

 

	
 

 

 

By:    /s/ Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker                                

          Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker
          President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 
	
 

 

 

By:    /s/ Richard Menniti                                      
          Richard Menniti
          Chief Financial Officer
No. 53069.

#### James E. Fox & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 144680-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the official papers disclosing that the protest was not filed within the prescribed time, as required by section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the motion to dismiss was granted.
No. 52665.

protests 532307-G, etc. (Boston).

#### R. H. White Company et al. *v.*United States,

*236Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
PROMISSORY NOTE AND TERMS

Principal amount: $140.000.00
Date: November 12, 1998


         FOR VALUE  RECEIVED,  the  undersigned  hereby  jointly  and  severally
promise  to pay to  the  order  of  Maxnet,  Inc.  the  sum of One  Hundred  and
Forty-Three  Thousand  Dollars  ($143,000.00).  Said sum shall be paid in Thirty
(30)-Days the manner following:

            $140,000.00 + $2800.00 interest and a $200.00 origination fee.
                            Total Due - $143,000.00.

TERMS - FIVE (5%) PERCENT OF SHARES OF LUXR, INC. STOCK AT PAR VALUE


         BE IT KNOWN,  the undersigned  Lenny Goldberg,  President - LUXR, Inc.,
hereby  agrees to sell Five (5%)  Percent  of LUXR,  Inc.  Stock at Par Value to
Maxnet, Inc.

         The  shares of stock  described  as Five (5%)  Percent of the shares of
stock of LUXR, Inc. at Par Value.

Signed under seal this 12th day of November, 1998.


Lenny Goldberg, President - LUXR, Inc.



Henry Val, CEO - Maxnet, Inc.


In accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

Witnessed:


Witness


Witness
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tony Kempsey, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 600]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), rendered November 30, 1993, convicting him of *566murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

The defendant’s fundamental right to be present at all material stages of the trial was violated when he was excluded from several sidebar conferences with prospective jurors which explored their backgrounds and their ability to weigh the evidence objectively *(see, People v Antommarchi,*80 NY2d 247, 250). Accordingly, the defendant’s judgment of conviction must be reversed *(see, People v Antommarchi, supra).*

In light of the foregoing determination, we need not address the defendant’s remaining contention. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Before the First Division,

September 29, 1944

No. 49731.

#### Protests 53271-K, etc., of Butler Bros. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the Third Division,

July 5, 1940

No. 44088.

#### Protest 997356-G of Hahne & Burns (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the dried ginger was imported from Freetown, Sierra Leone, in bags. It appeared from the papers that some of the bags were marked “Sierra Leone” while others were marked “Sa. Leone.” It was held that the collector erred in assessing the marking duty on the merchandise which was marked “Sierra Leone.” In view of *Lorillard*v. *United States*(24 C. C. P. A. 90, T. D. 48412) it was held that the marking “Sa. Leone” was sufficient. Abstracts 32638, 36598, 39884, 40802, and 43151 cited. Following *Kraft*v. *United States*(22 C. C. P. A. 111, T. D. 47103) the protest was sustained.