alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5525]



[[Page 14273]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-356-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request for Limited 
Waiver of Tariff Provisions

March 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 16, 2007, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern) tendered for filing its petition for a limited waiver of its 
FERC Gas Tariff in order to allow Northern to resolve two separate 
items related to imbalance resolution.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated 
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve 
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d89e9d8a9b97b6b4b1b6bd8bada8a8b7aaac98bebdaabbf6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afe9eafdece0c1c3c6c1cafcdadfdfc0dddbefc9caddcc81c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time April 6, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-5525 Filed 3-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### James Corona, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Rosemarie Corona, Deceased, Appellant, v Town of Hancock et al., Respondents.

[633 NYS2d 861]

—Crew III, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Mugglin, J.), entered September 22, 1994 in Delaware County, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a change of venue.

Plaintiff’s decedent died as the result of injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on the Major Deegan Expressway in Bronx County. This action for personal injuries, wrongful death and property damage was commenced in Bronx County but its venue thereafter was changed to Delaware County pursuant to the terms of CPLR 504 (2). Four years later, plaintiff moved for a change of venue to Bronx County on the ground of convenience of material witnesses. Supreme Court denied the motion and plaintiff appeals.

We affirm. It is clear that plaintiff failed to move for this discretionary relief within a reasonable time, and the four-year delay in doing so is wholly unexplained. Moreover, inasmuch as the facts urged in support of the motion were as apparent four years ago as they are now, the relief sought is also barred by laches (see, *Lawrence v Williams,*158 AD2d 369, 370).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
#### In the Matter of Tully Construction Company, Inc., Respondent, v United Minerals, Inc., Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 91]

—Spain, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Harris, J.), entered December 22, 1994 in Albany County, which, *inter alia,*granted petitioner’s application pursuant to Lien Law § 21-a to vacate and discharge a mechanic’s lien filed by respondent.

Respondent sold approximately 7,000 tons of limestone to R&S Concrete and Paving, Inc. at a cost of $57,746.98. When R&S failed to pay for the stone, respondent investigated its claim and determined that R&S had delivered the stone to a construction site where petitioner was the general contractor. Respondent filed a mechanic’s lien pursuant to Lien Law § 12. Petitioner, contending that it had no relationship with either respondent or R&S and that it had supplied its own stone, moved to discharge the lien. Petitioner also asserted that the lien was willfully exaggerated and requested damages and counsel fees pursuant to Lien Law § 39-a, together with costs and disbursements. In opposition to the motion, respondent produced witnessed statements by R&S drivers that they had delivered stone from respondent’s facility to the construction site. Respondent requested an evidentiary hearing. At oral argument, petitioner acknowledged that it had received 7,000 tons of limestone at a cost of approximately $50,000 and admit*698ted. that it had not supplied its own stone. At the conclusion of oral argument and without a hearing, Supreme Court discharged the lien, granted petitioner counsel fees in the sum of $7,500, awarded costs of $1,014 and sanctioned respondent in the amount of $5,000. Respondent appeals.

We conclude that Supreme Court erred in awarding petitioner counsel fees, costs and sanctions. Supreme Court’s inquiry into the merits of petitioner’s application pursuant to Lien Law § 39-a was unnecessary. "The remedy afforded to lienees by section 39-a of the Lien Law is available only when the lienor seeks to enforce his lien” *(Finger v Roth Bros. Regal Rest. Supply Corp., 2*Misc 2d 944, 945-946; *see also, Reeve Serv. Corp. v Raab,*64 AD2d 826; *Durand Realty Co. v Stolman,*197 Mise 208, *affd*280 App Div 758). Petitioner made a motion to vacate a mechanic’s lien; therefore the relief granted beyond vacating the lien should have been denied. In the instant case the lienor did not seek to enforce or foreclose the lien; the granting of relief pursuant to Lien Law § 39-a was improper.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as imposed sanctions and awarded counsel fees and costs; and, as so modified, affirmed.
No. 53083.

#### Artistic Foundations, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 77050-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1505]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the Foreign-Trade Zones Board Regulations (15 CFR Part 400), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

The Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the Board) has considered the application (filed 6/30/2006) submitted by the Brunswick Foreign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 144, Brunswick, Georgia, requesting reissuance of the grant of authority for said zone to the Brunswick and Glynn County Development Authority, a public corporation, which has accepted such reissuance subject to approval by the FTZ Board. Upon review, the Board finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest.

Therefore, the Board approves the application and recognizes the Brunswick and Glynn County Development Authority as the new grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 144, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

                    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th                     day of March 2007.                

David M. Spooner,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-5079 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Tessera Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Henry R.
Nothhaft, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Henry R. Nothhaft                
|Henry R. Nothhaft                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 7, 2008                       

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tessera Technologies, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Charles A. Webster, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles A. Webster                              
|Charles A. Webster                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|August 7, 2008                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 55292.

#### Eston Chemical, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 151106-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the ■court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Zatta,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 13,  2007                      |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/ ROBERT J.  ZATTA                          |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                                    |
| Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0044. LEMORIA MOSES v. DORA BELL MOSES.

Lemoria Moses and Dora Bell Moses were divorced in 2015. After the

superior court entered its final judgment in the divorce action, Lemoria Moses filed

an extraordinary motion for new trial. The superior court denied the motion, and

Lemoria Moses filed an application for discretionary appeal with this Court. 

The Georgia Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over all divorce and

alimony cases, including those cases ancillary to the divorce proceedings. See Ga.

Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (6); Morris v. Morris, 284 Ga. 748, 750 (2)

(670 SE2d 84) (2008); see also Todd v. Todd, 287 Ga. 250, 251-252 (1) (703 SE2d

597) (2010). Because the underlying subject matter of this application is divorce, it

is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/26/2016

August 26, 2016
No. 44092.

#### Protest 25284-K of C. J. Mentrup Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Penn*(27 C. C. P. A. 242, C. A. D. 93) the claim at 90 percent under paragraph 1529 was sustained.
No. 64954.

#### J. H. Coogan *v.*United States,

protest 60/4026 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meetings of the invasive species advisory committee. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given of meetings of the Invasive Species Advisory Committee. The purpose of the Advisory Committee is to provide advice to the National Invasive Species Council, as authorized by Executive Order 13112, on a broad array of issues related to preventing the introduction of invasive species and providing for their control and minimizing the economic, ecological, and human health impacts that invasive species cause. The Council is Co-chaired by the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of Commerce. The duty of the Council is to provide national leadership regarding invasive species issues. The purpose of a meeting on May 1-3, 2007 is to convene the full Advisory Committee and to discuss implementation of action items outlined in the National Invasive Species Management Plan, which was finalized on January 18, 2001. 

# DATES:

Meeting of Invasive Species Advisory Committee: Tuesday, May 1, 2007 and Thursday, May 3, 2007; beginning at approximately 8 a.m., and ending at approximately 5 p.m. each day. Members will be participating in an off-site tour on Wednesday, May 2, 2007. 

# ADDRESSES:

DoubleTree Grand Hotel Biscayne Bay, 1717 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33132. General Session on both days will be held in the Grand Ballroom. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kelsey Brantley, National Invasive Species Council Program Analyst; Phone: (202) 513-7243; Fax: (202) 371-1751. 

Dated: March 13, 2007. 

Lori C. Williams, 

Executive Director, National Invasive Species Council.

[FR Doc. E7-5257 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
#### Arvilla A. Van Rensselaer, *Respondent, v.*Corinth Woodworth and George Woodworth, *Appellants.*

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Hardin, J.
Exhibit 32.12

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Frontier Masters Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Frontier Masters Series.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                     
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Masters Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                       
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                        
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                            
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Masters Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: May 12, 2010