alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
       32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **EXCHANGE
        ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
  In
        connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of UpSnap, Inc. (the
        ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        Tony Phillip, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
        to
        the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
  i.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  ii.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to UpSnap, Inc and will be retained by
        UpSnap,
        Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon
        request.
  
 By 
        /s/ Tony Phillip
 
 Name:
        Tony Phillip,
 Title:
        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 Date:
        October 3, 2007
#### Chase *v.*Edwards.

Order appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Motion to dismiss the appeal denied, without costs, on the opinion of Haight, J., in the case of *Bennett*v. *Edwards.*
#### Commonwealth *v.*Wanamaker, Appellant.

Submitted November 22, 1968.

April 23, 1969:

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.

*Melvin Dildine,*Assistant Defender, and *Kernwn I. Pollock,*Defender, for appellant.

*James D. Crawford,*Assistant District Attorney, *Richard A. Sprague,*First Assistant District Attorney, and *Arlen Specter,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed.
exhibit1029.htm


Exhibit 10.29


 


 




MELROSE CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC












March 10, 2015







Via email: lalit@healthwarehouse.com


 


Lalit Dhadphale


President and CEO


HEALTHWAREHOUSE.COM, INC.


7107 Industrial Road


Florence, Kentucky  41042







Re:           Default under $750,000 Amended and Restated Promissory Note dated April 29, 2014, as amended,  made by


                HEALTHWAREHOUSE.COM, Inc. and its affiliates payable to Melrose Capital Advisors, LLC







Dear Lalit,







This letter is written in connection with the Amended and Restated Promissory Note dated April 29, 2014, as amended, in the principal amount of $750,000 (the “Note”) made by HEALTHWAREHOUSE.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, HWAREH.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, HOCKS.COM, INC., an Ohio corporation, and Pagosa Health LLC, an Indiana corporation (collectively, “Borrower”) payable to Melrose Capital Advisors, LLC (“Lender”).  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein will have the meanings set forth in the Note.







Section 7 (a) of the Note required Borrower to have a minimum EBITDAS for the Fiscal Quarter Ending December 31, 2014 of $(160,000) and Section 7 (b) of the Note required Borrower to have a minimum EBITDAS for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2014 of $(420,000).  Per the Certificate provided by the Company, the Borrowers failed to meet the minimum EBITDAS required by the foregoing covenants.  Such failure constitutes Events of Default under the Note.  Borrower has requested that the Lender waive the Events of Default.







Lender hereby grants a waiver of Borrower’s non-compliance with the foregoing covenants and of the Events of Default that would otherwise result from a violation of such covenants, solely for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2014 and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.







Except as expressly provided herein, nothing contained herein will be construed as waiving any default or Event of Default under the Note or will affect or impair any right, power or remedy of Lender under the Note or any agreement or instrument executed in connection therewith.












Very truly yours,







MELROSE CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC


 


 


 


 /s/  Timothy E. Reilly                                                         


        Timothy E. Reilly


        Managing Member







cc:           Dan Seliga
(V. D. 55)

Entry No. 737952, etc.

#### Compass Instrument *&*Optical Co. *v.*United States

(Decided December 11, 1957)

*Brooks & Brooks (Thomas J. McKenna*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These matters are presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in *Compass Instrument*& *Optical Co. et al.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 341, Abstract 58974. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matters be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, U. S. C. § 2636 (d)

The matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values were as set forth in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof.

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merT chandise.

The actions having been abandoned insofar as all other items of merchandise are .concerned, to that extent they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### The People of the State of New York *v.*The Globe Mutual Insurance Company. (Matter of McDermott.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs against McDermott. Opinion by Bockes, J.; Westbrook, J., not acting.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 Nos. 333-37914 and 333-114866 of Genius Products, Inc. and Subsidiaries
of our report dated March 19, 2004, with respect to the financial statements
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Genius Products, Inc. and
Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                        /s/ Cacciamatta Accountancy Corporation

                                            CACCIAMATTA ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION

Irvine, California
August 10, 2004
#### Timothy Simpson, *Respondent, v.*Nathan Brownson, *Appellant.*

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, under section 3240. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### SHELL OIL COMPANY, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HANOVER, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

See same case below: 71 *N. J. Super.*532.

*Messrs. Young <& Sears*and *Mr. William P. Westling*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Schenclc, Smith ■& King, Mr. Edward L. G. Vogt*and *Mr. E. Marco Stirone*for the respondents.

April 3, 1962.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 57 (Monday, March 26, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14043-14044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5482]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[EPA-R06-OAR-2006-0386; FRL-8291-6]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; El Paso 
County Carbon Monoxide Redesignation to Attainment, and Approval of 
Maintenance Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 23, 2007 (72 FR 2776), EPA published a direct final 
rule approving the redesignation of the El Paso, Texas, carbon monoxide 
(CO) nonattainment area to attainment for the CO National Ambient Air 
Quality Standard (NAAQS) and the CO maintenance plan with its 
associated Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEBs). EPA also found the 
MVEBs adequate. The direct final action was published without prior 
proposal because EPA anticipated no adverse comment. EPA stated in the 
direct final rule that if EPA received relevant adverse comment by 
February 22, 2007, EPA would publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal 
Register. EPA

[[Page 14044]]

subsequently received a timely relevant adverse comment on the direct 
final rule. Therefore, EPA is withdrawing the direct final approval, as 
well as the finding of adequacy for the MVEBs. EPA will address the 
comment in a subsequent final action based on the parallel proposal 
also published on January 23, 2007 (72 FR 2825).

DATES: The direct final rule published on January 23, 2007 (72 FR 
2776), is withdrawn as of March 26, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Riley, Air Planning Section, 
(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-8542; fax 
number 214-665-7263; e-mail address <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c5e454049550246494a4a5e49556c495c4d024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f5879c99908cdb9f90939387908cb5908594db929a83">[email protected]</span></a>.

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Intergovernmental relations.

40 CFR Part 82

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks, 
Wilderness areas.

    Dated: March 16, 2007.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.

0
Accordingly, the amendments to 40 CFR 52.2270(e) and to 40 CFR 81.344 
published in the Federal Register on January 23, 2007 (72 FR 2776), 
which were to become effective on March 26, 2007, are withdrawn.
 [FR Doc. E7-5482 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8220 

To clarify coverage of occupational therapy under the Medicare program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2024 

Mr. TRONE (for himself and Mr. NUNN of Iowa) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To clarify coverage of occupational therapy under the 

Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Occupational Therapy 

5 Mental Health Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFYING COVERAGE OF OCCUPATIONAL THER7 APY UNDER MEDICARE. 

8 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

9 of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8220 IH

1 shall provide education and outreach to stakeholders about 

2 the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual with respect to occu3 pational therapy services furnished to individuals under 

4 the Medicare program for the treatment of a substance 

5 use or mental health disorder diagnosis using applicable 

6 Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) 

7 codes. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) MISC.S-04-0017 FCD-PAN

)

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. ) ORDER TRANSFERRING VENUE

)

LEON A. WILLIAMS, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Pursuant to the Application for Inter-District Transfer filed

herein, venue is transferred to the Fresno Division of the U.S.

District Court, Eastern District of California. 

The Clerk is instructed to transfer the Court file, together

with a copy of this Order, to the Clerk, Eastern District of

California, Fresno Division; and to give notice of the transfer to

the parties. The Clerk in Fresno shall give notice of the transfer,

with the new District Court case number, to the parties.

Dated: February 3, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 2:04-mc-00017-FCD-PAN Document 3 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21.1
  Subsidiaries
    of Mediacom Communications Corporation
  State of Incorporation

Names Under WhichSubsidiary

or Organization

Subsidiary does BusinessMediacom LLC

New York

Mediacom LLCMediacom Cable TV I LLCMediacom Arizona LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Arizona LLCMediacom Cable LLCMediacom California LLC

Delaware

Mediacom California LLCMediacom Capital Corporation

New York

Mediacom Capital CorporationMediacom Delaware LLC

New York

Mediacom Delaware LLCMaryland Mediacom DelawareMediacom Illinois LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Illinois LLCMediacom Indiana LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Indiana LLCMediacom Indiana Partnerco LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Indiana PartnercoMediacom Indiana Holdings, L.P.

Delaware

Mediacom Indiana Holdings, L.P.Mediacom Iowa LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Iowa LLCMediacom Minnesota LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Minnesota LLCMediacom Southeast LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Southeast LLCMediacom New York LLCMediacom Wisconsin LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Wisconsin LLCZylstra Communications Corporation

Minnesota

Zylstra Communications CorporationIll Illini Cable Holding, Inc.

Illinois

Illini Cable Holding, Inc.Illini Cablevision of Illinois, Inc.

Illinois

Illini Cablevision of Illinois, Inc.Mediacom Broadband LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Broadband LLCMediacom Broadband Corporation

Delaware

Mediacom Broadband CorporationMCC Georgia LLC

Delaware

MCC Georgia LLCMCC Illinois LLC

Delaware

MCC Illinois LLCMCC Iowa LLC

Delaware

MCC Iowa LLCMCC Missouri LLC

Delaware

MCC Missouri LLCMCC Telephony, LLC

Delaware

MCC Telephony, LLCMCC Telephony of Florida, LLC

Delaware

MCC Telephony of Florida, LLCMCC Telephony of Georgia, LLC

Delaware

MCC Telephony of Georgia, LLCMediacom Telephony of Illinois, LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Telephony of Illinois, LLCMCC Telephony of Iowa, LLC

Delaware

MCC Telephony of Iowa, LLCMCC Telephony of Missouri, LLC

Delaware

MCC Telephony of Missouri, LLCMCC Telephony of the Mid-Atlantic, LLC

Delaware

MCC Telephony of the Mid-Atlantic, LLCMCC Telephony of the Mid-West, LLC

Delaware

MCC Telephony of the Mid-West, LLCMCC Telephony of the South, LLC

Delaware

MCC Telephony of the South, LLCMCC Telephony of Minnesota, LLC

Delaware

MCC Telephony of Minnesota, LLCMCC Telephony of the West, LLC

Delaware

MCC Telephony of the West, LLCMediacom Arizona Cable Network LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Arizona Cable Network LLCMediacom Aviation LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Aviation LLCMediacom Realty LLC

New York

Mediacom Realty LLC
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8336 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to establish a counseling pathway 

in the Transition Assistance Program for members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2024 

Ms. MCCLELLAN (for herself, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Ms. NORTON, Ms. 

OMAR, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. THANEDAR, Ms. WEXTON, Mr. 

MOYLAN, Ms. SALINAS, Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. 

WILLIAMS of Georgia, Ms. SPANBERGER, and Mr. VAN ORDEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to establish a counseling pathway in the Transition Assistance Program 

for members of the reserve components of the Armed 

Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8336 IH

1 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF COUNSELING PATHWAY IN 

2 THE TRANSITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR 

3 MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS 

4 OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

5 Section 1142(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, 

6 is amended, in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

7 by inserting ‘‘(including one pathway for members of the 

8 reserve components)’’ after ‘‘military department con9 cerned’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Commonwealth *v.*Frazier, Appellant.

Submitted March 17, 1969.

Before Bell, C.J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*37April 23, 1969:

*Harry Humbert,*and *Ray, Buck & John,*for appellant.

*Gerald, R. Solomon,*Assistant District Attorney, and *Joseph E. Kovach,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Appellant was tried by a jury and convicted of voluntary manslaughter in 1963. No post-trial motions were filed and no appeal was taken. In 1965 this Court held that appellant was entitled to a hearing under *Jackson v. Denno,*378 U.S. 368, 84 S. Ct. 1774 (1964) to determine the voluntariness of a confession introduced at appellant’s trial, and we remanded. *Commonwealth ex rel. Frazier v. Maroney,*419 Pa. 361, 214 A. 2d 221 (1965). The court held a hearing, at which appellant was represented by counsel, found that appellant’s confession was voluntary, and dismissed his petition. No appeal was taken.

In 1967 appellant filed a petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act, making the same claim that he had made in his earlier habeas corpus petition. The court below cited its prior decision, finding appellant’s confession to have been voluntarily made, and after taking further testimony from appellant dismissed the petition.*

*38We believe that the finding of the court below is fully supported by the record, and thus we affirm. The record before us shows that appellant was taken into custody at 8 P.M. and gave an initial oral admission at 1 A.M. At 3 A.M., after being moved from the Aliquippa Borough Jail to the Uniontown State Police Barracks and being given coffee, appellant gave a written statement. Although appellant claims that he had asked for an attorney when he was initially brought to the Aliquippa jail, the hearing judge chose to not believe this contention.

This record presents a garden variety *pre-EscobedoMiranda*situation. Although appellant perhaps was denied, the protections which those cases now guarantee, since the trial took place in 1963, *Miranda*and *Escobedo*do not apply. *Johnson v. New Jersey,*384 U.S. 719, 86 S. Ct. 1772 (1966). There is nothing further in the record before us that would permit us to conclude that the court below was required to find appellant’s confession involuntary. There is no indication that appellant was threatened, nor was his will overborne. The period of interrogation was hardly such as to require a finding that appellant’s confession was coerced.

The order of the Court of Oyer and Terminer of Fayette County is affirmed.

*

 Under these facts, it would seem that the Commonwealth could successfully assert that appellant must be denied relief in the current proceeding under section 4 of the Post Conviction Hearing Act, Act of January 25, 1966, P.L. (1965) 1580, §4, 19 P.S. §1180-4 (Supp. 1967), but since the Commonwealth has not at *any*time made this claim, we must consider it to be abandoned as being unsupportable on this record. See *Commonwealth v. Ritchey,*431 Pa. 269, 271 n.1, 245 A. 2d 446, 448 n.1 (1968).
No. 65592

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/13778 and 60/23872 (Norfolk).

*467Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8308 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8308

     To reauthorize the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2024

  Mr. Harder of California (for himself, Mr. Graves of Louisiana, Mr. 
Valadao, Mr. Garamendi, and Mr. Panetta) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reauthorize the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nutria Eradication and Control 
Reauthorization Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NUTRIA ERADICATION AND CONTROL ACT OF 2003.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(e) of the Nutria Eradication and Control 
Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 8102(e)) is amended by striking ``2025'' and 
inserting ``2030''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Section 3(a) of the Nutria Eradication 
and Control Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 8102(a)) is amended by striking 
```Secretary'),'' and inserting ```Secretary')''.
                                 <all>
```
*The HONORABLE ADRIAN G. DUPLANTIER, United States

District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation.

_____________

No. 95-2094WM

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Frank R. Peerman, also known *

as Barron Richard Hynes, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

Submitted: November 14, 1995

 Filed: January 29, 1996 _____________

Before FAGG, and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and DUPLANTIER,* District

Judge. _____________

PER CURIAM.

Frank R. Peerman appeals his drug-related convictions for

conspiracy, attempt to possess with intent to distribute, and use

of a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking offense.

Peerman contends the evidence is insufficient to support his

convictions for conspiracy and attempt to possess with intent to

distribute. We reject his contentions. Peerman also contends

there was plain error in the language of the attempt instructions

given by the district court. Again, we reject his contention.
-2-

Peerman also contends the evidence is insufficient to support

his drug-related firearm conviction. Our decision is guided by the

Supreme Court's recent decision in Bailey v. United States, 116 S.

Ct. 501 (1995). In light of Bailey, the Government concedes the

use of a firearm conviction should be reversed. We agree.

We thus affirm the drug convictions and reverse the firearm

conviction.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.