alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Charles, President of Oriole Inc.certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Oriole Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Dated: April 11, 2005

/s/ James Charles
-----------------
James Charles
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
AMENDMENT TO
                                THE TALBOTS, INC.
                          SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN

         Effective  as  of  March  15,  2001,  The  Talbots,  Inc.  Supplemental
Retirement Plan (the "Plan") is amended as follows:

         1. Section 2 of the Plan is amended by adding the  following to the end
thereof:

                  "Notwithstanding  anything  else herein to
                  the  contrary,  effective  as of March 15,
                  2001,  all Vice  Presidents of the Company
                  will  be  considered  to  be  Participants
                  herein."
#### Hubbard Foster and others, *Respondents, v.*The City of Buffalo, *Appellant.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on opinion of Mr. Justice Haight at Special Term.
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

 

I, Michael S. Wood, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Worldspan, L.P.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)             designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)             disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)             allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)            anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  May 19, 2004 |                     |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|
|                     | /s/ Michael  S. Wood     |
|                     | Michael S.  Wood         |
|                     | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                     | Worldspan,  L.P.         |

 

----
#### Ruth Young v. John Hancock Property et al.

Superior Court, Norfolk, SS

No. 99109

Memorandum Dated July 31, 2000

Donovan, J.

The plaintiff, Ruth Young, while riding as a passenger in a vehicle operated by Winifred Jiunta and insured by Arnica was involved in a collision with a vehicle insured by Travelers Insurance Company. Ms. Young received $11.500 from Travelers as her proportionate share of bodily injury limits of $15,000/$30,000.

Ms. Young filed this action seeking underinsured coverage from Arnica and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company which insured her own vehicle. Arnica and Fireman’s filed cross motions for summary judgment seeking a declaration as the priority of payment from the underinsured coverage of the policies.

Fireman’s policy provides:

> If there is other applicable similar insurance we will pay only our share of the loss. Our share is the proportion that our limit of liability bears to the total of all applicable limits. However, any insurance we provide with respect to a vehicle you do not own shall be excess over any other collectible insurance.

There is no question the vehicle Ms. Young was a passenger in was not owned by her. Therefore, her policy with Fireman’s becomes operative as excess over other underinsured policies.

Aside from the language of the policy, it is only fair and reasonable to look first to the policies on the vehicles involved in the accident. The insurer whose vehicle was not involved in the accident steps into the fray after the other policies are exhausted.

Summary judgment shall enter for Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company against Arnica Mutual Insurance Company.

ORDER

It is hereby *DECLARED, ORDERED*and *ADJUDGED:*

1. If the plaintiff, Ruth Young, becomes entitled to recover from the underinsurance provision of any policy, Arnica Mutual Insurance Company policy shall be exhausted before Fireman’s Fund Insurance policy shall be available for excess coverage.

DATED: July 21, 2000
No. 55321.

#### S. S. Kresge Company *v.*United States,

protests 136869-K, etc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures composed .wholly or in chief \ alue of papier máché the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *S. S. Kresge Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 89, C. D. 1269), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8391 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8391

 To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 with respect to 
cost sharing provisions for the territories and Indian Tribes, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2024

    Mr. Moylan (for himself, Mrs. Peltola, and Mrs. Gonzalez-Colon) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 with respect to 
cost sharing provisions for the territories and Indian Tribes, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COST SHARING PROVISIONS FOR THE TERRITORIES AND INDIAN 
              TRIBES.

    Section 1156 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2310) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``up to $200,000'';
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``the waiver amount 
        described in subsection (a)'' and inserting ``any amount waived 
        under subsection (a)''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (b) and redesignating 
        subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (b) and (c), 
        respectively.
                                 <all>
```
Case No. 8,501.

#### In re LORD.

[5 Law Rep. 258.]

Circuit Court, D. Ohio.

July 20, 1842.

Bankruptcy — Debts op Fiduciary Character— Auctioneer — Debt Contracted before Passage op Act.

This case having been certified up from the district court upon the following question, to wit: It appearing to the court that the debt specified in the schedule of the petitioner as owing, by the petitioner, to William A. Platt, is due from the petitioner in the character of auctioneer; and the court doubting whether said debt shall be considered as fiduciary in its character; and also doubting whether, in case it shall be so considered, it is a bar to a decree in bankruptcy,, in behalf of the said [Horace] Lord, — the above points having been submitted to the circuit court, without argument, and having been considered by THE COURT, it was held, that the debt of an auctioneer is of a fiduciary character, and that, under the act, no relief can be given against such debt; and (2) that this debt having been contracted before the passage of the bankrupt act [of 1841 (5 Stat. 440)] that the application is not thereby deprived of the benefit of the act, as to other debts.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES DUSTIN MCCAULEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 262 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Eco-Rx, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31,
1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          26,761
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,755
<PP&E>                                          37,534
<DEPRECIATION>                                (28,759)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          716,393
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,843
<OTHER-SE>                                   (683,945)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,291
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               174,447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (230,302)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (230,302)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
No. 38907.

#### Protests 909442-G, etc., of Arnhold & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Calypso  Financial  Services,
Inc.(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Edward F. Cowle,  Principal  Accounting  Officer of the  Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ Edward F. Cowle
-------------------------------
Edward F. Cowle
Principal Accounting Officer
October 4, 2004

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of International Monetary Systems, Ltd. ("Company") on Form 10-KA for the period ending December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), I, John E Strabley, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ John E Strabley


John E Strabley


(Principal Executive Officer)


October 4, 2012











This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 50122.

#### Protests 14195-K, etc., of Geo. J. Higginson et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the First Division,

October 18, 1949

No. 53633.

protests 117281-K, etc. (El Paso, etc.).

#### The American Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.

Cole, J., dissented on jurisdictional grounds, citing *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 158, C. D. 1175), *Fuchs Shoe Corp.*v. *United States*(id. 338, Abstract 53250), and *W. R. Zanes & Co.*v. *United States*(id. 339, Abstract 53251).
No. 46788.

#### Petition 6224-R of Douredoure Brothers (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It appeared that the drums were purchased in the foreign market as new drums and paid for as such. Entry was originally made at the purchase price but subsequently an amended entry was filed setting forth the price quoted by the foreign shipper for unclean, second-hand drums. This amended entered value was advanced by the appraiser to the invoice and eon-•cededly proper value for new drums, whereupon the importer appealed to reap-praisement, contending that since the imported drums were used to transport ■olive oil from the country of exportation they were not, in their imported condition, new drums. This contention was decided adversely to the importer in *Powell*v. *United States*(Reap. Dec. 4685 and Reap. Dec. 4919 and 28 C. C. P. A. 310, C. A. D. 160). The petitioners’ witness testified that prior to the arrival of these drums he communicated with the foreign shipper as to the values of the different kinds of drums used for transportation of olive oil, and that this shipment arrived before such information had been received from abroad. Entry was accordingly made at the invoice and purchase price with the request that appraisement be withheld pending receipt of information from the foreign shipper. Upon receipt of this information an amended entry was filed. The witness, it was disclosed by the testimony, stated that his action was prompted solely by his desire to get an expression from the court as to the proper dutiable value of these drums. From an examination of the record the court was satisfied that the entry of the drums at a less value than that found on final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue or to deceive the appraiser as to the true value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 58112.

protests 145717-K, etc. (Duluth).

#### F. E. Macartney *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the Western white spruce lumber the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(31 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1538), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 46184.

#### Protests 975155-G, etc., of T. M. Duche & Sons et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In view of Abstract 45762 and the agreement of counsel that the ginger is not composed in chief value of manufactured sugar it was held not dutiable under the Sugar Act of 1937 as claimed.
#### The Board of Supervisors of Saratoga County *v.*Mary J. Parker and others.

Order requiring retaxation affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements to each attorney appearing. Bookes, J., not- acting.
Before the Third Division,

August 3, 1942

No. 47427.

#### Protests 607366-G, etc., of Scaramelli & Co. et al. (Providence, etc.).

*389Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1-900 JACKPOT, INC. (FORMERLY PULTRONEX CORPORATION)
                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian  Fisher,  solely for the purpose of  complying  with 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
hereby  certify  that to my  knowledge  Annual  Report  of 1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.
(formerly  Pultronex  Corporation)  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31,
2002 ("Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such
Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of 1-900 Jackpot, Inc. (formerly Pultronex Corporation).



DATE:  NOVEMBER 22, 2005

/S/ BRIAN FISHER
------------------------
    BRIAN FISHER
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER




A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.