alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Star Central Corp. (the Company), a Delaware corporation, for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, Christopher H. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael J. Walsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.



The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbane-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|    | Signature              | Title                   | Date          
|--- | ---------------------- | ----------------------- | --------------
|By: | /s/ Christopher H. Lee | Chief Executive Officer | August 9, 2004
|    | Christopher H. Lee     |                         |               
|By: | /s/ Michael J. Walsh   | Chief Financial Officer | August 9, 2004
|    | Michael J. Walsh       |                         |               



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Star Central Corp. and will be retained by Southern Star Central Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Currency Series.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                         
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                             
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                           
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                            
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Currency Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              
|                                                                                                                                           
|Date: August 12, 2008
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com August 1 1 , 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Ryan Noonan Exemption Request Under Section 333 of

the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of

2012 , 4 9 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or M adam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

, 49

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Ryan Noonan an operator of Small Unmanned

Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct full service photography and v ideography

, seeks exemption f rom the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to allow

commercial operation of the DJI Phantom Series and DJI Inspire within the National

Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low

- risk, aerial video and photography of Real

Estate Properties (for homeowners, realtors, home builders, home contractors an d / or

home inspectors for real estate marketing and inspection of home exteriors) as well as

filming of special events, and film sets over certain areas of the United States, conducted

within and under the conditions outlined herein, or as may be establis hed by the FAA, as

required by Section 333 requirements.

Ryan Noonan in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the requirements of

14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 91.121

, 91.151(b)

, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ),and 91.417(a) and (b)

.

Ryan Noonan has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition

because it would not set a ny precedent and because the relief requested is identical to

numerous exemptions granted previously by the FAA . 14 C.F.R. § 11.87.

In addition

, Ryan Noonan will be utilizing the s ame DJI Phantom Series and DJI Inspire

pr oven technologies the FAA has already accepted and approved in over 75 percent of

approved exemptions. All of the appropriate documentation to accompany Ryan

Noonan ’s Sec tion 333 Petition is included. Combined, th e comp rehensive Section 333UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given to the se chosen products and

th e technology, should provide th e support necessary to the FAA for a S ummary G rant

of Ryan Noonan ’s Section 333 Petition and expedite the process.

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Jo e Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas
February 24, 1944

No. 49231.

#### Protest 806904-G of Hughes Tool Co.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American DefenseSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Anthony Piscitelli, Chief Executive Officer, Presidentand Chairman of the Company and Gary Sidorsky, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our best knowledge:

 

1.     The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 15, 2008 |   | By:                                              | /s/ Anthony Piscitelli |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
|                    |   | Anthony  Piscitelli                              |
|                    |   | Chief Executive  Officer, President and Chairman |
|                    |   |                                             |
|                    |   |                                             |
|                    |   | By:                                              | /s/ Gary Sidorsky      |
|                    |   | Gary Sidorsky                                    |
|                    |   | Chief Financial  Officer                         |
|                         |        |                                                  |                        |  |

 

----
#### William Kanna, *Respondent, v.*Michael Kester, Appellant.

Motion denied.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-13-00436- CV

Nort h For est Independent School District ; Dr . Lin da Robin son, In divid ually an d as a Mem ber of the Nort h For est Independent School District Board of

Trustees and Dr. Silvia Brooks Wi lliams, Individ ually an d as a Mem ber of the Nort h For est Independent School District Board of

Trustees, Appellants
v. Michael L. Williams, State Com m ission er of Edu cation; and Li zet te G onzales Reynolds, Chief Depu ty Adm inis trat or and Deligee of Defendan ts Michael L. Williams,

State Com m ission er of Edu cation, Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 53RD J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 3-0 0178 9, H ONO RAB LE DARLENE BY RNE, JUDGE P RESIDING
O R D E R P ER CURIAM

We deny appellants’ “Emer g ency Motion for T emporary Relief Related to Petition for Writ of Injunction” and dismiss as moot their motion to expedite c onsideration of that
emer g ency

motion. It is ordere d on J une 24, 2013.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and Rose
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American DefenseSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Anthony Piscitelli, Chief Executive Officer, Presidentand Chairman of the Company and Gary Sidorsky, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our best knowledge:

 

1.     The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 14, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Anthony  Piscitelli                          |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Anthony  Piscitelli                              |
|                        |   | Chief Executive  Officer, President and Chairman |
|                        |   |                                             |
|                        |   |                                             |
|                        | By:    | /s/ Gary Sidorsky                                |
|                        |   | Gary Sidorsky                                    |
|                        |   | Chief Financial  Officer                         |

 

----
EXHIBIT
10.8


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
OF LISA M. FOWLER


 


 


 


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


Exhibit 10.8


 


FIRST AMENDEMENT TO


EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment (“Amendment”)
is made effective as of November 9, 2011 by and between First Clover Leaf Bank (the "Bank"), with its principal office
in Edwardsville, Illinois, and Lisa Fowler ("Executive").


 


WHEREAS, the Bank
and the Executive are parties to the Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2008 (the "Agreement"); and


 


WHEREAS, the Bank
and the Executive wish to amend the Agreement to clarify the Executive's job description.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended in
its entirety to read as follows:


 


		1.	POSITION AND RESPONSIBILITIES.



 


Executive shall serve as
the Senior Vice President — Chief Lending Officer of the Bank. In this position and except as provided in the next sentence,
Executive shall be responsible for overseeing the administration of the loan department and the credit function of the loan process,
which includes oversight of production, quality, compliance, file construction and support, personnel, systems, product development,
and regulatory standards for all loan activities. Executive shall not be responsible for production in the commercial loan division,
although Executive will aid in soliciting, negotiating and closing of commercial lending. Executive shall also be responsible for
reviewing the Bank's loan portfolio on a continuing basis in order to prevent or ameliorate loan losses, assure documentation is
in compliance with loan committee and board approvals, state and/or federal regulations; assist in detection of deterioration in
loan quality, review and ensure internal compliance objectives are met. Executive shall report to and support the Chief Executive
Officer in areas of leadership, direction, development and implementation of the policies and procedures for the lending function
of the Bank. Executive shall be responsible for promoting and developing new noncommercial lending business and for building and
maintaining Bank relationships with the community, civic groups and local businesses, and will represent the Bank at related events.
Executive shall stay abreast of regulations and legislation that directly affect the Bank. Executive also agrees to serve, if appointed
or elected, as an officer and director of any subsidiary or affiliate of the Bank.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment on the dates set forth below.


 


 


	 	 	FIRST CLOVER LEAF BANK
	 	 	 
	November 9, 2011	 	By:	/s/ Dennis M. Terry
	Date	 	 	Dennis M. Terry,
	 	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	November 3, 2011	 	/s/ Lisa Fowler
	Date	 	Lisa Fowler
No. 58097.

protests 209418-K, etc. (New York).

#### Nouvette Trading *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of veils or veilings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 57645, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 41832.

#### Protest 193927-G of Wm. McKinney (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items in question consist of embroidered laces. The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained as to these items.
July 10, 1939

No. 41835.

#### Protests 291942-G, etc., of Calvaire.

Abstract 41645. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
6929

#### STATE v. YOE.

1. Indictment. — Finding by Circuit Judge that part of an indictment had not been stricken out sustained.

*2.*New Triad. — Refusal of motion for new trial on ground that evidence warranted the conviction of appellants for keeping a gaming house affirmed.

Before Prince, J., Greenwood, March Term, 1906, and Purdy, J., February Term, 1907.

Affirmed.

Indictment against Thomas Yoe and W. S. Yoe for keeping a gambling house. From sentence on verdict of guilty, defendants appeal.

Messrs. *Bilis G. Gray don*and *Wm. N. Gray don.*for appellants.

*Mr. Wm. N. Gray don*cites: *To convict of keeping a gaming house the State must show it was such a house and that it was kept by defendant:*53 Mo. App., *571;*115 Ga., 570; 10 la., 453; 68 Ind., 46; 33 Me., 43; 35 Tex. App., 397.

*Solicitor R. A.*Cooper, contra.

Oral argument.

June 27, 1908.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Pope.

The defendants, W. S. Yoe and Thomas J. Yoe, were tried at the March term, 1906, of the Court of General Sessions for Greenwood county, before Judge Prince and a jury, upon the charge of keeping and maintaining a house for the purpose of gaming.

After the case had been committed to the jury and a charge from his Honor, Judge Prince, the jury returned a verdict of guilty; whereupon the defendants moved an arrest *382of judgment, which was granted. From the ruling of the Circuit Judge, the solicitor appealed to this Court.

The appeal came on to be heard on the 17th of January, 1907, the opinion 'being rendered by Mr. Justice Woods, which decision will be found in 76 S. C., 46, 56 S. F. Rep., 542, whereby this Court overruled the action of the Circuit Court, and remitted the case to the Circuit Court for sentence, and at the February term, 1907, Judge Purdy sentenced each of the defendants, Thomas J. Yoe and W. S. Yoe, to pay a fine of one hundred and twenty-five dollars and be imprisoned at hard labor in the penitentiary for three months.

The defendants, thereupon, appealed to this Court.

1 Judge Prince, when he heard the cause, held that the form of the indictment was good, holding that the words “against the form of the statute made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State” was actually embraced in the indictment and was not meant to be stricken out. That while the solicitor did run his pencil a little too high up, he did not run his pencil through these words. Upon inspection of the indictemnt we agree with the Circuit Judge.

However, the finding of fact by the Circuit Judge is conclusive upon us.

2. All the other grounds of appeal, it seems to us, are included in the judgment rendered in the first appeal of this case, and we therefore overrule such grounds; being questions of fact, which we as a Court have nothing to do with.

The judgment of this Court is, therefore, that the appeal be dismissed, and the case is remitted to the Circuit Court to have Judge Purdy’s order carried into execution.
No. 58091.

protests 197894-K, etc. (Galveston).

#### Amerada Petroleum Corp. and Leslie B. Canion et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel casings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 32, C. D. 1577), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES W. GILLESPIE, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. George K. Meier, Jr.*for the petitioner. .

*Mr. John G. Thevos*and *Mr. Archibald Kreiger*for the respondent. • . ■

February 27, 1968.

Denied.
(Reap. Dec. 8577)

#### Cosmos Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 784144, etc.

(Decided May 11, 1956)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawRENce, Judge:

Presented for determination by the court is the proper dutiable value of certain loudspeakers and parts thereof identified by the items marked *“A”*and initialed “JWM” by Examiner J. W. Molay on the invoices accompanying the entries covered by the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule *“A,”*attached to and made a part of this decision.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact to the effect that said items of merchandise were freely offered for sale for home consumption in England, the country of exportation, at the time of exportation, to all purchasers in the principal markets of England in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade at the entered values, and that there was no export value for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that foreign value, as such value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), *569is the proper basis for determining the value of the items of merchandise marked and initialed as aforesaid, and that the entered values constitute such value.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Before the First Division,

March 8, 1950

No. 54108.

#### Geigy Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protest 134173-K/ 1315 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles O. Whitfield, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 315]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict finding defendant guilty of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]) is not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). At trial, defendant did not deny stabbing the victim but relied upon the defense of justification. The key question for the jury was whether defendant believed the victim was about to use deadly force against him and, if so, whether that belief was reasonable *(see, People v Goetz,*68 NY2d 96; *People v Comfort,*113 AD2d 430). Based upon the evidence that defendant did not see the victim with a weapon that evening, and that the victim was unarmed, and given the nature of the wounds inflicted upon the victim, we conclude that the jury did not fail "to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” *(People v Bleakley, supra,*at 495).

The FBI report of the victim’s criminal record did not constitute new evidence under CPL 330.30 (3), and was not such evidence as "probably” would have changed the result if a new trial were granted *(People v Burnette,*117 AD2d 987, 989). Further, the report did not constitute *Brady*material *(see, Brady v Maryland,*373 US 83; *United States v Bagley,*473 US 667, 682; *People v Vilardi,*76 NY2d 67, 73-74). We conclude, therefore, that the contentions raised by defendant in his *pro se*supplemental brief are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J.—Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.