alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP07-142-001] 

Take notice that on March 2, 2007, CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company (CEGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 603, to be effective March 1, 2007: 

CEGT states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Commission's order dated February 27, 2007 in which CEGT was directed to correct a word processing error. 

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-4486 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

NOV 26, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-13003

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

Agency No. A98-589-900

RUBEN ALONSO LEMUS-SANCHEZ,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

________________________

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

_________________________

(November 26, 2008)

Before ANDERSON, BARKETT and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ruben Alonso Lemus-Sanchez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, seeks
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) decision dismissing his

appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen so that

he could apply for an adjustment of status, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229a(c)(7), 1255, more

than one year after he failed to depart the United States pursuant to his voluntary

departure agreement. “We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for

1

abuse of discretion.” Ali v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 443 F.3d 804, 808 (11th Cir. 2006).

If the Attorney General permits an alien to depart the United States

voluntarily, the alien must do so during the prescribed period. See INA § 240B(a),

(d), 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(a), (d). If the alien fails to depart the United States within

the specified time period, he becomes ineligible to, inter alia, apply for an

adjustment of status or change of status for a period of ten years. See id.; INA §

245(i)(1)(A), 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i)(1)(A); see also Dada v. Mukasey, 554 U.S. __,

128 S.Ct. 2307, 2310, 171 L.Ed.2d 178 (2008) (noting that failure to depart within

the prescribed voluntary departure period renders the alien ineligible for

adjustment of status for a period of ten years).

In this case, Lemus-Sanchez admitted that he remained in the United States

after his voluntary departure period expired. Thus, he must wait a period of ten

years before seeking an adjustment of status. See INA § 240B(d)(1)(B), 8 U.S.C.

 We agree with the government that Lemus-Sanchez’s brief does not comply with Fed. 1

R. App. P. 28(a)(9)(A). However, we exercise our discretion to consider the brief. See Mendoza

v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 327 F.3d 1283, 1286 n.4. (11th Cir. 2003). 

2
§ 1229c(d)(1)(B). Accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in dismissing

Lemus-Sanchez’s appeal from the denial of his motion to reopen for purposes of

seeking an adjustment of status, and we deny Lemus-Sanchez’s petition for review.

PETITION DENIED.

3
#### State, *ex rel.*National Trucking Company, v. J. M. Lee, as State Comptroller.

181 So. 182.

Division A.

Opinion Filed January 22, 1938.

Supplemental Opinion Filed April 28 1938.

*Stanton Walker,*for Relator;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, *Theo T. Turnbull*and *Wm. P. Simmons,*for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of State of Florida, *ex rel.*Five Transportation Company, *et al.,*v. J. M. Lee, as Comptroller of the State of Florida.

The principal difference in the two cases is that in this case the Relator is a contract carrier while in the former case the Relators were auto transportation companies engaged in the business of a common carrier.

*534It is true that as to the business of this Relator the Railroad Commission does not establish either routes or schedules, but it does approve the rates fixed by the Relator. The Relator is required to file its rates with the Commission. We take it that when the Relator contracts to convey merchandise from one point to another he must necessarily, when figuring the prices and terms of his contract, take into consideration the fact that his motor vehicle will in all probability carry load but one way and the expense of one way of the trip empty must be included as a part of the basis upon which his compensation is to be fixed.

We think there is no difference in the principles to be applied in this case and in the companion case and that there is no difference in the construction of the statute which should be applied in one case to that which is applied in the other.

Therefore, upon authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of State of Florida, *ex rel.*Five Transportation Company, v. J. M. Lee, as Comptroller of the State of Florida, decided at this Term, the alternative writ should be quashed and it is so ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Supplemental Opinion.

Per Curiam.

A demurrer to the answer and return of ■the respondent herein being on file when the last order herein was entered, it is now considered and ordered that the order quashing the alternative writ is vacated and the demurrer to the answer and return is overruled and the relator is allowed twenty days in which to join issue on the answer and return of the respondent, or to further plead-if so desired.

*535It is so ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-88,111-01

EX P ARTE JOHNNY CASTRO, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. D-1-D C-12-904069- A IN THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT

F ROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam . Alcala, J., filed a concurring opinion . O R D E R Pursuant to the provi s i o n s o f Arti cle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 967). Appli cant was convicted of capital murder and injury to a child, and he was sentenc ed to incar cer ation. He was also charg ed with and convicted of felony murder. The Third Court of Appea ls set aside the felony murder conviction, but it aff irmed the convictions for capital murder and injury to a child. Castro v. State , No. 03-12-00730- CR (Tex. App.—Austin del. Mar. 13, 2015)

. Applicant raises sever al claims in hi s habea s application, including claims of ineffe ctive assistance of trial and appellate counsel. He has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

.-2-

Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Pa t t er s o n , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). There is no response from trial or appellate counsel in the rec ord provided to this Court. In these c ircumstance s, additional fac ts are ne eded. A s we he ld in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court s h al l o rder trial and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffe ctive assistance by explaining counsels’ repr esentation of Applicant, including applicable strategy and tactica l decisions. To obtain the response s, the trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hearing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court sha ll appoint an attorney to repr esent Applica

nt at the hea

ring . T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law reg arding the claims raised in the habea s application. The trial court may also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law it deems rele vant and appropriate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claims for habea s corpus relief

. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcript cont ai n i ng all aff idavits and int err og atories or the transc ription of the court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwa rded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order

. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this C ourt. Filed: March 28,2018 Do not publish
No. 48520.

#### Protest 91918-K of Samuel S. Perry (Seattle).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

From an examination of the official papers nothing was ■'found to warrant disturbing the classification of the collector, which was held presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1
                                                                    ------------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Korea Thrunet Co., Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F/A for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
          the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


     Date: November 1, 2005                   By:    /s/ Soon-Yub Samuel Kwon
                                                  ------------------------------
                                              Name:  Soon-Yub Samuel Kwon
                                              Title: CEO



     Date: November 1, 2005                   By:    /s/ Young Whan Cho
                                                  ------------------------------
                                              Name:  Young Whan Cho
                                              Title: CFO


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Korea Thrunet Co., Ltd., and will be retained by Korea Thrunet Co.,
Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-11026

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

STEPHEN DURWIN DOBBINS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-135-5

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Stephen Durwin

Dobbins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dobbins has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 51053.

#### Protests 944008-G, etc., of Hi Wo Hong & Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), the merchandise, in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Bak hop, lotus nuts (hoi shin lien, hoi pak lien), sui sut, wai san (stick), sar sum (uncut), lo hon qua, yuen yuk, and mok qua were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs; and (2) wai san (sliced), yuk chuk, and sar sum (cut) were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as drugs, advanced. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 47406.

#### Petition 6231-R of Stone & Downer Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The advance in value equalled the invoice charge for inland freight, which amount was deducted on entry. This item of inland freight had always been deducted and allowed as a nondutiable charge. It appeared that early in 1941 the examiner, appraiser, and a representative of the importer conferred to determine where the merchandise actually originated and what place was to be considered the market therefor. As a result it was decided that the item was not a deductible charge but should be considered part of the *385dutiable value. This particular entry was then in the course of passage through customs procedure and it was agreed that the importer would be given an opportunity to amend the same by adding the item of inland freight. However, apparently through an oversight, the entry was not so amended and was therefore advanced by the appraiser and additional duties assessed. The court was satisfied that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case. The petition was granted.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-09-0426 SAT Date: 7/10/2009 Print Date: 3/17/2010

Related cases : CBI : Yes Health related cases: Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 2 1
Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal, inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,S,MM,L; AQUATOX
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-09-0426 FATE: Estimations for low weight, Liquid with MP = 15 EC (M) log Kow = 5.46 (E); S = 3.43 mg/L at 25 EC (E) VP = 7.2E-4 torr at 25 EC ( N OMO5) BP = 274-296 EC (M) H = 1.70E-4 (E) log Koc = 2.89 (E) log Fish BCF = 3.27 (E) log Fish BAF = 2.71 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption, stripping and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk Sorption to soils/sediments = moderateVolatilization half-life from a standard river = 7 hrs Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 8 da Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 5.2 hr via OH radical PBT Potential: P1B2 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate

Health : Health Summary: Expect poor absorption via all routes ( p che m ). Concern for irritation to all tissues (MSDS).

Ecotox :

Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 0.22 fish

_ chronic value 0.013 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.019 algal

_ chronic value 0.15 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value

_ Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; SAR chemical class = alcohol; log Kow = 5.68 (EPI); MW 214; p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations ; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs neutral organic chemicals SAR Class alcohol

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
#### Theodore V. Masten, *Respondent, v.*John Olcott and Adelaide Olcott, *Appellants.*

-Motion for new trial denied and judgment for plaintiff on verdict, with costs. Opinion by Learned, P. J.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8163 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permanently add stainless steel 

flatware to the list of covered items required to be procured from American sources, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2024 

Ms. TENNEY (for herself and Mr. WILLIAMS of New York) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permanently add 

stainless steel flatware to the list of covered items required to be procured from American sources, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Ordinance Re5 quiring Kitchenware Specifically Made in America Act’’ or 

6 the ‘‘FORKS Made in America Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8163 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT ADDITION OF DOMESTICALLY PRO2 DUCED STAINLESS STEEL FLATWARE TO THE 

3 BERRY AMENDMENT. 

4 (a) ADDITION TO COVERED ITEMS.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 4862(b) is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(3) Stainless steel flatware.’’. 

8 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

9 by paragraph (1) shall take effect on October 1, 

10 2023. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 854(a)(3) 

12 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

13 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended by striking ‘‘para14 graphs (3) and (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (4)’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. (the Company) on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Kenneth T. Neilson and Christina L. Maier, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Kenneth T. NeilsonKenneth T. NeilsonChief Executive Officer/s/ Christina L. MaierChristina L. MaierChief Financial Officer


April 30, 2014

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be considered filed as part of the Report.
(Reap. Dec. 10758)

#### Howard S. Reeder et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. H-856, etc.

(Decided May 19, 1964)

*George E. Patterson, Jr.,*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General *(Morris Braverman,*trial attorney) , for the defendant.

Kao, Judge:

The 10 appeals for reappraisement here involved have been consolidated for purposes of trial. They relate to importations of used Volks wagon automobiles which were appraised at the invoiced unit values, plus items designated as inland freight, purchase commission, and conversion fees, packed.

When these cases were called for trial, counsel for plaintiffs moved to submit upon the official records, and defendant having joined in the application, the matter was so disposed.

An examination of the official papers fails to disclose any evidence to overcome the presumptively correct values returned by the appraiser, and said values are , therefore, found to be the values of the merchandise covered by these appeals.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.