alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Tony Philipp, the Chief Executive Officer and Paul Schmidt, the
      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of UPSNAP, INC. (the “Company”), DO HEREBY
      CERTIFY that:





1. The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
      (as amended by amendment no.2) (the “Report”), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
      15 th day of
      September 2006.





/s/
      Tony Philipp


Tony
      Philipp


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





/s/
      Paul Schmidt


Paul
      Schmidt


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      UpSNAP, Inc. and will he retained by UpSNAP, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 57366.

protests 179155-K (A), etc. (New York).

#### Maurice Urdang et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of resistors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 57045, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALONZO REED, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2471 FCD GGH P

vs.

ROY A. CASTRO, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has timely filed a notice of appeal of

this court’s July 6, 2005 denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. Before petitioner

can appeal this decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R.

App. P. 22(b).

A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 “only if the

applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2). The court must either issue a certificate of appealability indicating which issues

satisfy the required showing or must state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. 

Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02471-FCD-GGH Document 17 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s May 6, 2005 findings and

recommendations, petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:July 29, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02471-FCD-GGH Document 17 Filed 07/29/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 49720.

#### Protests 79256-K, etc., of Robert Badenhop Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel sole crepe rubber similar to that the subject of *United States*v. *F. Lester Kittle*(31 C. C. P. A. 233, C. A. D. 276) was held entitled to free entry as claimed.
#### WINDSOR CONTRACTING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. VINCENT BUDNY AND BUDNY’S TIRE SERVICE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Argued December 18,1967

Decided December 22,1967.

*Mr. Edward B. Meredith*for appellants *(Messrs. Meredith &*Meredith, attorneys).

*Mr. Anton J. Hollendonner*for respondent.

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division, 93 *N. J. Super.*235. Mr. Justice Proctor votes to reverse for the reasons given by Judge Goldmann in his dissenting opinion.

*For*affirmance—Chief Justice Wbintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Ebancis, Schettino and Haneman—5.

*For*reversal—Justice Pboctoe—1.
**FastenTech, Inc. and Subsidiaries**

 

Exhibit 31.2 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Michael R. Elia, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FastenTech, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 14, 2005
**Exhibit 23.1** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the    Registration Statements on    Form S-3    (File    No. 333-82124)    and    Form S-8    (File Nos.    333-41360,333-68306,333-122787    and    333-129008)    of Mediacom Communications Corporation of our report dated    March 14, 2008 relating to the financial statements,    financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal    control over financial reporting, which appear in this    Form 10-K. /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers    LLP     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     New York, New York     March 14, 2008
null

530.4707
#### John F. Landers, *Sole Surviving Partner, etc., Respondent, v.*Larry Lewis, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Wooten, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 159]

—Appeal by the de*675fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Orgera, J.), rendered June 1, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was denied his right to a public trial *(see,*US Const 6th Amend; Civil Rights Law § 12; Judiciary Law § 4; *People v Jones,*47 NY2d 409, *cert denied*444 US 946). At a hearing pursuant to *People v Hinton*(31 NY2d 71, *cert denied*410 US 911), an undercover police officer testified that he would be returning to the area and very street corner adjacent to where the defendant was arrested, and to the area where the defendant lived, in his capacity as an undercover officer, and that he was engaged in pending cases and ongoing investigations. He stated that his testimony in open court could threaten his viability as an undercover officer and could threaten his safety. That testimony met the requirements for closure set forth in *People v Martinez*(82 NY2d 436). The defendant does not dispute that the general requirements for closure set forth in *People v Martinez (supra)*had been met, but asserts that closure was overbroad, because the court "closed the courtroom to appellant’s father”. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Pearson,*82 NY2d 436; *People v Hammond,*208 AD2d 559; *People v Bouche,*208 AD2d 445).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Thompson, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended  November 30, 2005 (the "Report") by
Advanced Media Training, Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.




January 11, 2005                           By: /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Buddy Young
                                               Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                               Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 844 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 844

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to allow an owner of a trade 
 secret redress of the theft of trade secrets extraterritorially, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

Mr. Obernolte (for himself, Mr. Steube, Mr. Pfluger, and Mr. Crawford) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to allow an owner of a trade 
 secret redress of the theft of trade secrets extraterritorially, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect American Trade Secrets Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REDRESS OF THEFT OF TRADE SECRETS EXTRATERRITORIALLY.

    Section 1836 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Applicability to Conduct Outside United States.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this section shall apply to 
conduct occurring outside the United States and impacting United States 
commerce, including conduct by an offender who is--
            ``(1) not a United States person or an alien lawfully 
        admitted for permanent residence into the United States; or
            ``(2) an organization which is created or organized under 
        the laws of a foreign government or which has its principal 
        place of business located outside of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(b)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-KSB of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2005, I, Lamont Thomas, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.



 /s/ Lamont Thomas
----------------------------------
Lamont Thomas
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Pender Newkirk & Company, CPAs**

**Independent Registered Certified Public Accountants**

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders 

UTEK Corporation 

Plant City, Florida 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the UTEK Corporation Amended and Restated Employee Stock Option Plan and the UTEK Corporation Amended and RestatedNon-Qualified Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 18, 2005 with respect to the December 31, 2004 and 2003 consolidated financial statements, including schedules of investments of UTEK Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Pender Newkirk & Company

 

 

Pender Newkirk & Company 

Certified Public Accountants 

Tampa, Florida 

February 24, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, certifies that to the best of his knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL
Lifestyle Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, and its results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  | /s/ R. Byron Carlock, Jr.            
|Date: May 15, 2009 |  | R. BYRON CARLOCK, JR.                
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
**FastenTech, Inc. and Subsidiaries**

 

Exhibit 31.1 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Ronald B. Kalich, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FastenTech, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 14, 2006
No. 45042.

#### Protest 489714-G of National City Bank (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar to that the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
#### MOREIRA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. MORETRENCH CORP., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Messrs. Pindar, McFlroy, Connell & Foley*and *Mr. George J. Kenny*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Schenck, Price, Smith <& King*and *Mr. Clifford W. Starrelt*for the respondent.

December 19, 1967.

Granted.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Docket No.High Prairie Wind Farm II, LLC
EG07-19-000Wayzata California Power Holding, LLC
EG07-20-000Cedar Creek Wind Energy, LLC
EG07-21-000Dogwood Energy LLC
EG07-22-000Reliant Energy Ormond Beach, Inc.
EG07-23-000Camp Grove Wind Farm LLC
EG07-24-000Fenton Power Partners I, LLC
EG07-25-000Buena Vista Energy, LLC
EG07-26-000Nuovo Pignone s.p.a.
FC07-6-000
 Take notice that during the month of February 2007, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a). Philis J. Posey, Acting Secretary.


[FR Doc. E7-4986 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
No. 76-5731.

#### Berryhill *v.*Georgia.

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied. See *Gregg*v. *Georgia,*428 U. S. 153, 227 (1976) (Brennan, J., dissenting); *id.,*at 231 (Marshall, J., dissenting).

Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant certiorari and vacate judgment insofar as it leaves undisturbed the sentence of death.
Exhibit 32.10

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Managed Futures Index Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                               
|Robert J. Enck                                                                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC,           
|the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                 
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                  
|Brent Bales                                                                      
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC,                         
|the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                 
|Date: May 10, 2007
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. EDWARD A. DEVLIN, Jr., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

April 13, 1964. Denied.

*Mr. Augustine A. Repetto*and *Mr. Ernest M. Curtis*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Van Riper & Belmont*and *Mr. Frederic C. Ritger, Jr.*for the respondent.

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.