alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Frontier Fund.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                            
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund
Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund



|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                 
|Brent Bales                                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of The Frontier Fund

Date: May 8, 2009
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Series.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                       
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                         
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                          
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                              
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              
|                                                                                                                                         
|Date: May 10, 2007
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8379 

To codify certain rules issued by the Secretary of Transportation relating 

to airline fare transparency, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2024 

Mr. GOTTHEIMER (for himself, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. GALLEGO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To codify certain rules issued by the Secretary of Transportation relating to airline fare transparency, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enhancing Trans5 parency from Airlines Act of 2024’’ or the ‘‘ETA Act of 

6 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8379 IH

1 SEC. 2. CODIFICATION OF RULES RELATING TO AIRLINE 

2 FARE TRANSPARENCY. 

3 The following final rules issued by the Secretary of 

4 Transportation shall have the force and effect of law: 

5 (1) The rule titled ‘‘Refunds and Other Con6 sumer Protections’’ and published on April 26, 2024 

7 (89 Fed. Reg. 32760). 

8 (2) The rule titled ‘‘Enhancing Transparency of 

9 Airline Ancillary Service Fees’’ and published on 

10 April 30, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 34620). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
October 30, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CLAUDE KITTLES, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00619-CV V.

VINTAGE PARK, L.P., Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on July 24, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Claude Kittles.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
No. 60924.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 245469-K (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed as untimely.
#### Louis Viera, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 168]

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yoswein, J.), entered April 19, 1994, which, after a jury trial on the issue of liability finding the defendant 90% at fault and the plaintiff 10% at fault in the happening of the accident, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it.

Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.

The trial court improperly ruled that the defense counsel was required to lay a foundation for the introduction of an inconsistent prior statement made by the plaintiff that was used for impeachment purposes. Where the witness sought to be discredited is a party to the action, the laying of a foundation is unnecessary, as the party’s statements are treated as admissions and, as such, are received as primary evidence against him or her *(see,*Richardson, Evidence § 502 [Prince 10th ed]).

Further, the court erroneously admitted the notice of claim into evidence. In the complaint the plaintiff alleged that he had complied with all the conditions precedent to commencing the action. The defendant’s answer denied this allegation, except that it admitted that it had been presented with a notice of claim. At the trial, the plaintiff offered the notice of claim to establish that he had timely complied with the filing requirements thereof. Over the defendant’s objections, the court redacted the references contained in the notice of claim which related to injuries and money damages and otherwise admitted the notice of claim. The notice of claim, even as redacted, contained descriptive and conclusory accusations of negligence and its admission was clearly prejudicial *(see, Kaplan v City of New York,*10 AD2d 319).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, however, we do not find that the trial court acted in a partial manner. Moreover, under the facts of this case, there is no indication that the court coerced the jury in reaching a verdict or that the court’s charge was improper.

Nevertheless, in light of the errors committed by the court, the defendant was deprived of a fair trial, and a new trial is granted. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.
#### George W. Bradner, *Respondent, v.*William O. Gile, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Hardin, J.
No. 99-50957 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50957 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RENE TERRAZAS-ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-99-CR-713-1-DB

-------------------- April 13, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rene Terrazas-Acosta appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry into the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) & (b)(2). He argues that the district court mistakenly believed that it lacked the authority to depart downward based on his cultural assimilation into the United States. The record indicates that the district court recognized its authority to depart downward based on cultural assimilation but determined that a downward departure was not warranted based on the facts ofNo. 99-50957 -2- the case. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the district court’s decision. See United States v. Reyes-Nava , 169 F.3d 278, 280 (5th Cir. 1999). This court notes that in his plea agreement Terrazas-Acosta agreed to waive the right to appeal his sentence except in certain circumstances which do not exist here. However, the Government makes no mention on appeal of this waiver. Nor has the transcript of the plea hearing been included in the appellate record, which precludes this court from determining whether or not the waiver was informed and voluntary. The knowing and voluntary waiver in a plea agreement of the right to appeal has been approved by this court. See United States v. Portillo , 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Melancon , 972 F.2d 566, 567 (5th Cir. 1992). This court is at a loss to understand why the Government has not raised the issue of waiver in this case, and why defense counsel did not include a transcript of the Rule 11 hearing in the record.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton
Series.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                             
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                               
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                    
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund                                                                                                                        
|Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Campbell/Graham/Tiverton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund                                                      

Date: May 12, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy (DON), after consultation with the Attorney General as required by 5 U.S.C. 575(c), has adopted a policy that authorizes contracting officers to use binding arbitration procedures for issues in controversy arising under procurement contracts using appropriated and non-appropriated funds. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John A. Dietrich, Assistant General Counsel (ADR), telephone 202-685-6990. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The policy is contained in Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5800.15, “Use of Binding Arbitration for Contract Controversies,” and is available on                     *http://doni.daps.dla.mil/​SECNAV.aspx*                     and                     *http://adr.navy.mil*. The instruction provides interpretive guidance regarding applicable statutes and regulates the internal affairs of the DON by granting authority to contracting officers to use binding arbitration for issues in controversy.                 

Dated: March 12, 2007. 

M.A. Harvison, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-5031 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
Before the Second Division,

December 8, 1960

No. 64955.

#### Waldburger & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/14388, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Shelley, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sunergy, Inc. for the period
          ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Sunergy, Inc.

Dated: June 29, 2011
                                         /s/ Mark Shelley
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Mark Shelley
                                         Secretary, Treasurer and Director
                                         (Principal Financial Officer and
                                         Principal Accounting Officer)
                                         Sunergy, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Sunergy, Inc. and will be retained
by Sunergy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Florida Power Corporation; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of 
Amendment to Facility Operating License, Proposed No Significant 
Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing; 
Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Issuance; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice published in the Federal 
Register on March 13, 2007 (72 FR 11381), which informs the public that 
the NRC is considering issuance of an amendment to Renewed Facility 
Operating License No. DPR-72. This action is necessary to correct the 
name of the licensee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly A. Clayton, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-3475, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f4969597c6b49a8697da939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c4e4d4f1e6c425e4f024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page 11381, appearing near the bottom of 
the second column, the heading is corrected to read as above, and in 
the last line of the second column and the first line of the third 
column, ``Florida Power and Light'' is corrected to read ``Florida 
Power Corporation.''

    Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of March 2007.

    For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Stewart N. Bailey,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch II-2, Division of 
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
 [FR Doc. E7-5249 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Before the Third Division,

September 14, 1944

No. 49715.

#### Protests 44331-K, etc., of John J. Brunner Agency, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the portions 'of cheese in question, except one portion which is Tilsit, are similar to those the subject of *Gruyere Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 171, C. D. 562) and *Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 767). In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as to certain of the merchandise, except Tilsit cheese.
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2Dawson’s argument that the Administrative Law Judge committed

an error of law by not classifying him as being of “advanced age”

for the purposes of the pre-2001 disability benefits is wholly

without merit. An individual of “advanced age” is an individual

age fifty-five or older. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1563(e). Born on

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 9, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 04-31121

Summary Calendar

_____________________

DAVID A. DAWSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport

USDC No. 5:03-CV-660-SMH

_________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

David A. Dawson seeks review of the Social Security

Administration’s denial of disability insurance benefits to which

he claims entitlement. The Administrative Law Judge held that

Dawson was not disabled on or before December 31, 2000, when he was

last eligible for such benefits. Dawson argues that the facts show

he was disabled beginning October 28, 1998.2 We review a final
September 23, 1946, Dawson became fifty-five years old on September

23, 2001, well after the period at issue here.

decision under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to determine whether the decision

was supported by substantial evidence in the record and whether the

proper legal standards were used in evaluating the evidence.

Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994).

There is little evidence to suggest that Dawson could not

perform “light work” prior to January 2001, when colon cancer was

first suspected. The medical records on which Dawson relies show

only that he sought treatment for a groin abscess in October 1998

and again in June 1999. In early 2001, he denied any prior medical

problems other than the abscess. A medical expert reviewing the

medical records concluded that Dawson’s only functional limitations

occurred after surgery in 2001. We find that the record provides

substantial evidence to support the Commissioner’s decision that

Dawson was not disabled on or before December 31, 2000, when he was

last eligible for Social Security disability insurance benefits.

AFFIRMED.