alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 6,788.

#### In re HOWES.

[21 Vt. 619; 2 N. Y. Leg. Obs. 271; 6 Law Rep. 297.]

District Court, D. Vermont.

Aug., 1843.

Repeat, or Law — Whets it Takes Effect.

1. The statute repealing the bankrupt act took effect the day it was approved, which was March 3, 1843 [5 Stat 614], and, as there can be no fractions of a day in a question of this nature, it must be considered as being in force from the first moment of that day.

[Cited in Westbrook Manuffg Co. v. Grant, 60 Me. 95.]

2. The presenting and filing of the petition is deemed to be the commencement of a proceeding in bankruptcy; and where the petition was presented March 3, 1843, it was held, that no order could be taken upon it, other than to dismiss it.

[Cited in Re Welman, Case No. 17,407.]

This was a petition by David Howes, declaring himself to be unable to meet his debts and engagements, and praying for the ■benefit of the bankrupt law. The petition was presented and filed March 3, 1843; and it was moved that an order of notice to creditors and others be issued thereupon, to show cause why the petitioner should not be declared a bankrupt.

PRENTISS,' District Judge.

The act passed at the last session of congress, repealing the bankrupt law, was approved on the third day of March, and of course the act became a law. and took effect as such on that day. As there can be no divisions or fractions of a day in a question of this nature, the act in construction of law, must be considered as having relation to, and as being in force from, the first moment of the day on which it was approved; and, consequently, the bankrupt law was repealed, and ceased to have any operation, except what is reserved to it by .the proviso to the repealing act, from and after the day preceding.

The proviso, so far as is material to the question' under consideration, merely declares, that the act shall not affect any case or proceeding in bankruptcy, commenced before the passage of the act, but every such proceeding may be continued to its final consummation in like manner as if the act had not been passed. .The effect of the proviso being simply to qualify and limit the enacting clause, so far as to save, from its operation, and allow it to be continued and prosecuted, such cases in. bankruptcy, as were commenced and pending before the passing of the act, that is.in legal consideration, as we have seen, before the day on which the act was passed, no case or proceeding in bankruptcy Is saved by the proviso, except such as was commenced before' that day. The presenting and filing of the petition is deemed to be the commencement of a proceeding in bankruptcy; and as the petition in the present case was presented and filed, not before but on the day, on which the repealing act was passed, and so not before the passage of the act, the proceeding was not commenced in time, and no order can be taken upon the petition, other than to dismiss it.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10759

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Noel Mandujano, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:20-CR-15-2

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Noel Mandujano has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Mandujano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 20, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10759 Document: 00516173549 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/20/2022
No. 21-10759

2

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-10759 Document: 00516173549 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/20/2022
----

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Guoshen Tu, the Chief Executive Officer ofCHINA SECURITY & SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBYCERTIFY that: 

1.

The Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2007 (the"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. 

Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operation of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed thisstatement this 13th day of November 2007. 

/s/ Guoshen Tu                                        Guoshen Tu Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc.and will be retained by China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing. 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5005 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 640
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5005

 To authorize additional funding for the San Joaquin River Restoration 
                            Settlement Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 2024

Mr. Padilla (for himself and Mr. Hoeven) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           November 21, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize additional funding for the San Joaquin River Restoration 
                            Settlement Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RESTORATION 
              SETTLEMENT ACT.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations To Implement Settlement.--
Section 10009 of the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act 
(Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1355) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``$250,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$750,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``$250,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$750,000,000''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations for Friant Division 
Improvements.--Section 10203(c) of the Omnibus Public Land Management 
Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1367) is amended by striking 
``$50,000,000'' and inserting ``$75,000,000''.
                                                       Calendar No. 640

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 5005

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To authorize additional funding for the San Joaquin River Restoration 
                            Settlement Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 21, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 497 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude a basic allowance 

for housing from income for purposes of eligibility for the supplemental 

nutrition assistance program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2023 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. KING, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. WARNOCK, Mr. BENNET, Mr. 

WELCH, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. BOOKER, 

Mr. FETTERMAN, Mr. TESTER, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude 

a basic allowance for housing from income for purposes 

of eligibility for the supplemental nutrition assistance 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Family Nutri5 tion Access Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 497 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 

2 FROM INCOME. 

3 Section 5(d) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

4 (7 U.S.C. 2014(d)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (18), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

6 end; 

7 (2) in paragraph (19)(B), by striking the period 

8 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(20) a basic allowance for housing paid to a 

11 member of a uniformed service under section 403 of 

12 title 37, United States Code.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




CERTIFICATION
      OF CUSTODIAN




In
      connection with the Annual Report of *Turner
      Valley Oil & Gas, Inc.* .,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
      2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Christorpher
      Paton-Gay ,
      Sole
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of


the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material


respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
        March 31, 2005
 /s/Christopher
                  Paton-GayChristopher
                  Paton-Gay
                president/director/Sole
                  Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4957]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 341

[Docket No. 1976N-0052G] (formerly Docket No. 76N-052G)


Cold, Cough, Allergy, Bronchodilator, and Antiasthmatic Drug 
Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Technical Amendment

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending its 
regulations to change the location of a section in an over-the-counter 
(OTC) drug monograph. This action is editorial in nature and is 
intended to improve the accuracy of the agency's regulations.

DATES: This rule is effective March 19, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerald M. Rachanow, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, rm. 5496, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-
2090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA published the final monograph (FM) for 
cold, cough, allergy, bronchodilator, and antiasthmatic combination 
drug products for OTC human use in the Federal Register of December 23, 
2002 (67 FR 78158). In that FM, FDA inadvertently added Sec.  341.40 
(21 CFR 341.40) to subpart C of the monograph, when that section should 
have been added to subpart B of the monograph. Accordingly, FDA is now 
moving Sec.  341.40 from subpart C to subpart B of the monograph.
    Publication of this document constitutes final action on this 
change under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553). Notice 
and public procedures are unnecessary because FDA is merely 
implementing a change in the location of a section in an OTC drug 
monograph. No other changes are being made to that section of the 
monograph.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 341

    Labeling, Over-the-counter drugs.

0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
341 is amended as follows:

PART 341--COLD, COUGH, ALLERGY, BRONCHODILATOR, AND ANTIASTHMATIC 
DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 341 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 351, 352, 353, 355, 360, 371.

Subpart B--Active Ingredients [Amended]

0
2. Remove Sec.  341.40 Permitted combinations of active ingredients 
from subpart C and add it to subpart B of part 341.

    Dated: March 12, 2007.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E7-4957 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**DEBUTBROADCASTING CORPORATION, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),of Debut Broadcasting Corporation Inc. (the “Company”) we, Steven Ludwig, ChiefExecutive Officer, and Sariah Hopkins, Chief Financial Officer, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)   | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2)   | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

May 15, 2008

 
|   | By:    | /s/Steven Ludwig        |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven Ludwig           |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer |

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Sariah Hopkins      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Sariah Hopkins          |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1,                fully                complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                October 20, 2008 | /s/                Paul                Goodman                                                  |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Paul                Goodman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial                Officer |

----
Case 2:04-mc-00259-GEB-GGH   Document 41    Filed 02/16/06   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-mc-00259-GEB-GGH   Document 41    Filed 02/16/06   Page 2 of 2

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-21T13:29:15-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Before the Third Division,

January 20, 1943

No. 47931.

#### Protest 997912-G of H. Toda (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same as that in *Pacific Trading Co.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 221, C. D. 610). The protest was therefore sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 150A17

Filed 22 December 2017

STEPHEN VICTOR WHEELER

v.

CENTRAL CAROLINA SCHOLASTIC SPORTS, INC. d/b/a CENTRAL 

CAROLINA SCHOLASTIC BASEBALL SUMMER LEAGUE

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the unpublished decision of a 

divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 798 S.E.2d 438 (2017), 

affirming an order granting summary judgment entered on 22 April 2016 by Judge 

Claire V. Hill in Superior Court, Cumberland County. Heard in the Supreme Court 

on 11 December 2017.

Jerome P. Trehy, Jr. for plaintiff-appellant. 

Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog LLP, by Melody J. Jolly, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-5191-000]


Owen, Paul E.; Notice of Filing

March 8, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 2, 2007, Paul E. Owen filed an 
application for authority to hold interlocking positions as Director of 
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative and TEC Trading, Inc., pursuant to 
Section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 825d(b)), 18 CFR 
45.8 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, and Order No. 664.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbfdfee9f8f4d5d7d2d5dee8cecbcbd4c9cffbdddec9d895dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="11575443525e7f7d787f74426461617e636551777463723f767e67">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 2, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4625 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Roswell Enos v. John E. Sutherland and Another.

A decree in Chancery which consists in part of a reference to a commissioner to take an account between the parties, is not a *final*decree, and an appeal cannot be taken therefrom to the Supreme Court.

The practice of making such decrees final in form, in anticipation of the commissioner’s report, is objectionable, and should be discontinued.

*Submitted January*1*6th.*

*Decided January 22d.*

Appeal in chancery from Berrien Circuit.

The hill was filed to redeem certain premises alleged to have been conveyed to defendants in mortgage. The decree adjudged the land to he held by defendants in mortgage, g ordered a reference to a Circuit Court Com*149missioner to take an account of the amount due defendants, and of the waste committed and improvements made by them on the premises, and if a balance was found due defendants, directed payment thereof by complainant within three months after confirmation of the Commissioner’s report, and that in default of such payment, the premises be sold to satisfy the same. Defendants appealed.

*F. Muzzy,*for complainant.

*F. A. Winslow,*for defendants.

Manning J.:

The appeal in this case, which was submitted on briefs, must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, as the decree appealed from is not a final decree. It consists, in part, of a reference to a Circuit Court Commissioner to take an account of what is due to defendants, &c. This part of the decree is interlocutory, and the action and report of the Commissioner on the matters referred to him must be had before a final decree can be made. It also contains (a practice very objectionable, and one that should be discontinued,) what in form is a final decree, in anticipation of the Commissioner’s report. But this part of the decree can have no effect whatever, or be regarded as final until the Commissioner’s report is made and confirmed. The policy of the statute in only allowing appeals from final decrees, isp that the whole mase shall be reviewed in this court at one time, and not in detached parts at different times, thereby lengthening litig-ation.

What are and what are not final decrees thatjmay be appealed from, was considered by this court in *Caswell v.*Comstock, 6 *Mich.*391, in which an appeal from a decree similar to the present was dismissed.

Appeal dismissed without costs to either party.

The other Justices concurred.
No. 52278.

protests 503385-G, etc. (Boston).

#### Jordan Marsh Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.