alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of Coca-Cola Embonor S.A., a Chilean
company and foreign private issuer (the "Company"), on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger Ford, Corporate Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Coca-Cola Embonor S.A. and will be retained by Corporate Chief
Financial Officer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



By:/s/ Roger Ford
   -------------------------------------------
   Name:  Roger Ford
   Title:  Corporate Chief Financial Officer


June 26, 2003
#### 459 CENTRAL AVENUE CORP., *ETC.,*PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE, *ETC.,*DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Messrs. Mainardi & Mainardi*for the petitioner.

*Mr. William L. Brack*and *Mr. Norman E. Scull*for the respondent.

March 26, 1968.

Denied.
#### In the Matter of James A. Deering.

Order modified as directed in opinion, and affirmed as modified, without costs to either party. Opinion by Daniels, J.
#### David Craig, *Appellant, v.*The Town of Andes, Respondent.

Judgment reversed; new trial granted; referee discharged, costs to abide event. .Opinion by Westbrook, J.; Bockes, J., not acting.
Before the First Division

November 23, 1960

No. 64923.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/5874 and 59/5878 (Los Angeles).

The following memorandum accompanied the order restoring cases to calendar:

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise to which the two protests here involved relates is so-called piano stools which were assessed with duty at the rate of 16% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, for manufactures of wood, not specially provided for. Each of the protests claims such merchandise to be properly dutiable at 11 or 12% per centum ad valorem, according to the date of entry for consumption, under the provision in said paragraph 412, as modified, for furniture, other than chairs, wholly or in chief value of wood.

When the protests were called for trial, they were submitted for decision upon oral stipulation of counsel that—

> * * * if these entries were now before the Appraiser for his- advisory return they would- be advisorily described by him for the benefit of the collector as other furniture, in chief value of wood, under paragraph 412, and that if they were now before the collector for his official return he would classify the piano stools as “other furniture, chief value of wood,” following [T.D.] 54865(26) at 12% per cent, by virtue of T.D. 51802 as to the stools covered by Protest 59/5874, imported in 1955 [and], at 11 per cent, by virtue of T.D. 54108, as to the stools covered by Protest 59/5878, imported in September of 1957.

In a memorandum accompanying an order issued this day and reported as 45 Cust. Ct. 168, C.D. 2219, in the matter of protest 58/8054, *Ucago, Inc.*v. *United States,*restoring the said protest to the calendar, we held that such a stipulation represented the conclusions of the appraiser and collector as to the facts and law of the case, arrived at at a time when neither had power to change the original classification and when their acts would not be clothed with a presumption of correctness, and did not constitute either competent or sufficient evidence upon which a judgment of this court in accordance with such conclusions may be based.

For the reasons therein expressed, order will issue setting aside the submission of this case and restoring the same -to the next Los Angeles calendar for all purposes.
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|May 15, 2007 | /s/ Marc N. Teal       
|------------ | -----------------------
|             | Marc N. Teal           
|             | Chief Financial Officer
|             |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2012 (the “Report”) of TICC Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/ s / Jonathan
H. Cohen                                | 
|------------------------------------------------------ | 
|                                                       | 
|Name: Jonathan H. Cohen
        Date: November 9, 2012 |
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Albert A. Joy *v.*The Fire Commissioner.

Writ of *certiorari*quashed on opinion in *People ex rel. Crafts*v. *The Fire Commissioner.*Opinion by Gilbert, J.; Barnard, P. J., dissenting.
No. 58623.

protest 236317-K (New York).

#### Swan Mill, Inc. v. United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper napkins the subject of *Wesley & Winter, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 24, C. D. 1575). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited authority, it was held that the merchandise is dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1413, as modified, *supra.*
No. 56498.

protest 899311-G (Los Angeles).

#### W. N. Modglin & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was established that the duty and internal revenue taxes were assessed on the same quantity, to wit, 624 gallons, which was the full quantity contained in 260 cases. Further, it was admitted that 54 bottles, each containing a fifth of a gallon, were broken. In view of the evidence presented it was held that duty and internal revenue taxes were not *432assessable upon the 54 bottles which were broken. The claim of the plaintiff that customs duties should have been imposed only on the quantities subject to internal revenue taxes was also sustained.
No. 50104.

#### Protests 114077-K, etc., of Allied Mat & Matting Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) of TICC Capital
Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/S/ PATRICK F. CONROY                       
|Name: Patrick F. Conroy Date:
August 6, 2010



61
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13302-13303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Lake Champlain Sea Lamprey Control Alternatives Workgroup

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service, we, our), 
announces a meeting of the Lake Champlain Sea Lamprey Control 
Alternatives Workgroup (Workgroup). The Workgroup's purpose is to 
provide, in an advisory capacity, recommendations and advice on 
research and implementation of sea lamprey control techniques 
alternative to lampricide that are technically feasible, cost 
effective, and environmentally safe. The primary objective of the 
meeting will be to discuss potential focus research initiatives that 
may enhance alternative sea lamprey control techniques. The meeting is 
open to the public.

DATES: The Lake Champlain Sea Lamprey Control Alternatives

[[Page 13303]]

Workgroup will meet on Monday, April 16, 2007, from 12 p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the State University of New 
York, Valcour Educational Conference Center, 3712 Route 9--Lakeshore, 
Plattsburgh, NY 12901.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Tilton, Designated Federal 
Officer, Lake Champlain Sea Lamprey Control Alternatives Workgroup, 
Lake Champlain Fish and Wildlife Resources Office, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, 11 Lincoln Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452, at 802-
872-0629 (telephone); <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#14507562714b407d78607b7a547263673a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c185a0b7a49e95a8adb5aeaf81a7b6b2efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a> (electronic mail).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We publish this notice under section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.). The 
Workgroup's specific responsibilities are to provide advice regarding 
the implementation of sea lamprey control methods alternative to 
lampricides, to recommend priorities for research to be conducted by 
cooperating organizations and demonstration projects to be developed 
and funded by State and Federal agencies, and to assist Federal and 
State agencies with the coordination of alternative sea lamprey control 
research to advance the state of the science in Lake Champlain and the 
Great Lakes.

    Dated: March 13, 2007.
Richard O. Bennett,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, 
Massachusetts.
 [FR Doc. E7-5140 Filed 3-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

FINAL REPORT 1

A mendment of Pa.R.J.C.P. 1128

On October 14, 2020 , the Supreme Court amended Rule of Juvenile Court

Procedur e 1128 to clarify requirements for the presence of children at dependency proceedings.

Upon request , the Committee reviewed Pa.R.J.C.P. 1128 (Presence at Proceeding s ) to consider whether the rule invited a practice whereby children of a certain age were categorically excused from being present in court. While the rule d id

not encourage excu sing children, the Committee recommended the rule be refined to emphasize the importance of a child’s appearance and the need to consider a child’s

individual circumstances when deciding whether to excuse the child from a proceeding.

Pa.R.J.C.P. 1128 (A) g enerally requires all parties to be present at dependency proceedings. This paragraph is amended to specifically include children under the general requirement. Pa.R.J.C.P. 1120 (Definitions) defines a “party” as “ a person or the county agency who has st anding to participate in the proceedings but nothing in these Rules confers standing upon a person .” Under this definition, a child is a party because the child has standing to participate. See, e.g. , Pa.R.J.C.P. 1151 (providing for appointment of guardi an ad litem or counsel to represent a child). Specifically including the child in paragraph (A) reinforce s the importance of the child’s presence and

eliminate s the need for readers to rely upon a definition to understand the scope of the requirement.

Th e Comment is also revised to emphasize th at exceptions to a child ’s presen ce at dependency proceedings are to be based on individual circumstances. Moreover,

the Comment reference s the requirement of Pa.R.J.C.P. 1129(A)(2) that the child be physically present in court at least every six months. Finally, the Comment indicates that a child’s unease while attending should be mitigated by the court.

T he amendment will become effective J anuary 1, 2021.

1 The Committee’s Final Report should not be confused with the official Committee

Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the

Committee’s Comments or the contents of the Committee’s explanatory Final Reports.
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Winton Series.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                       
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                         
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                          
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                              
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Winton Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 26, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7210
ELIZABETH KNEWASSER, Petitioner - Appellee, versus RICHARD PATTSULL, Judge, Honorable, Respondent - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-426-R) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 21, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elizabeth Knewasser, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Elizabeth Knewasser seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Knewasser v. Pattsull , No. CA-98-426- R (W.D. Va. July 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

Summary of Stakeholder Meetings 

Carissa Cyran 

Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-20 13-0602. EPA-HQ-OAR-20 13-0603, and EPA-HQOAR-20 13-0495 

This memorandum summarizes meetings with stakeholders during the week of June 1. 20 15. 

On June 3. Administrator Gina McCarthy. Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation 

Janet McCabe and Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and 

Radiation Joseph Goffman participated in a conference call with Tom Farrell of Dominion. 

On June 3. Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and 

Radiation Joseph GoiTman spoke with Bruce Lourie, director of an independent system operator 

in Ontario, Canada. 

Internet Address (URL) • http //www epa gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Pronted w1th Vegetable 0•1 Based Inks on 100•,. Postconsumer Process Chtor~ne Free Recycled Paper
(Reap. Dec. 10145)

#### Plyworld Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 81.

(Decided January 23, 1962)

*522
      *Sharp*<£ *Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*William II. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been limited to the merchandise described on the invoice as “Occumé Marine Plywood 18 mm, sanded two sides, Tropical, water- and boil-proof, Quality A/A.”

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the item in question, as hereinabove identified, is cost of production, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is the invoice unit price, net, packed, and I so hold.

The appeal for reappraisement, having been abandoned as to all other items of merchandise included on the invoice covered by the entry involved herein, is to that extent dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Before the First Division,

March 27, 1952

No. 56501.

protests 138155-K, etc. (New York).

#### Anco Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.