alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOK T. LAU,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTONIO V. SILVA, ANTONIO V.

SILVA P.C., PATRICIA TSUBOKAWA

REEVES, AND REEVES & ASHLEY, 

Defendants.

CIV. S-04-2351 WBS PAN PS

 ORDER

—NFN—

On February 23, 2005, this court granted plaintiff’s

request to enlarge time until April 22 to respond to defendants’

motions to dismiss. The court granted the request upon the

grounds plaintiff is representing himself, is not legally trained

and is hindered by physical and psychological disabilities. Fed.

R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1); E. D. Cal. L. R. 78-230(c).

On April 18, plaintiff filed a second request for

enlargement of time on the grounds that his health has further

Case 2:04-cv-02351-WBS-DAD Document 19 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

declined and he has decided to seek but been unable to obtain

legal representation. 

Plaintiff has submitted an April 16, 2005, letter from

his psychiatrist, who states he has treated plaintiff, a former

FBI special agent, for four years for major depression and posttraumatic stress disorder; that plaintiff “is now so debilitated

by his psychiatric disorder that he has trouble finding his way

around the area where he lives;” that plaintiff’s attempt to

represent himself and failure to yet obtain representation

“aggravates the stress he is under and produces exacerbation of

his symptomology.”

Plaintiff has also submitted a March 8, 2005, letter from

attorney Greg Meyer, whom plaintiff states provided the only

written response declining representation out of the half dozen 

law firms contacted by plaintiff. The letter provides advice on

statutes of limitations and other sources of legal

representation.

The court again finds good cause to extend the time

within which plaintiff must respond to defendants’ motions to

dismiss. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1). The court accords plaintiff

an additional 60 days within which to respond, or by Tuesday,

June 21, 2005; defendants may file their reply briefs, if any, by

July 5. Should plaintiff fail to respond to the pending motions 

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-02351-WBS-DAD Document 19 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

on or before June 21, this court may recommend this action be

dismissed. 

So ordered.

Dated: April 26, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02351-WBS-DAD Document 19 Filed 04/26/05 Page 3 of 3
(Reap. Dec. 10476)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 750993-1/4.

(Decided April 4, 1963)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement for decision upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the tires, exported from Holland, here involved.

On the basis of the said stipulation, I find the export values of the merchandise to be:

(1) As to the items identified on invoice No. 1 as 240 tires, 24 by 1.75 black, and on. invoice No. 2 as 4,000 tires 24 by 1.75 black, US $58.47 per 100 tires, net, packed.

(2) As to the items identified on invoice No. 3 as 1,200 tires, 26 by 1.75 black, US $64.82 per 100 tires, net, packed.

(3) As to the remainder of the merchandise specified on invoices No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, the invoiced unit prices, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Frank, Alst on and Senior Judge Coleman

UNINSURED EMPLOYER’S FUND MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0683-10-3 PER CURIAM AUGUST 10, 2010 DAVID SCOTT RIGGS

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (John R. Sigmond; Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, on brief), for appellant. No brief for appellee.

The Uninsured Employer’s Fund (hereinafter referred to as the Fund) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission awar ding David Scott Riggs (claimant) temporary total disability. The Fund contends the commissi on erred in finding the claimant demonstrated he was totally disabled from October 11, 2008 through March 29, 2009.

We have reviewed the record and the commi ssion’s opinion and find th at this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for th e reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Riggs v. Boston’s Essential Cuts Tree Service , VWC File No. VA010-0242-2200 (Mar. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argumen t and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in th e materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. HERBERT LEE CAMPBELL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

See same ease below: 97 *N. J. Super.*435

*Mr. Brendan T. Byrne*and *Mr. James B. Zazzali*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Querques, Isles & Weissbard*for the respondent.

March *12,*1968.

Granted.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; andb)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; andc)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 May 13, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Paul E. HendersonDate
    
    Paul E. HendersonChief Accounting Officer
Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC,
the Manager of NNN 2003 Value Fund, LLC(principal financial officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 485 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 485

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act to authorize the President to provide hazard mitigation 
  assistance for mitigating and preventing post-wildfire flooding and 
                  debris flow, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2023

  Mr. Padilla (for himself and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act to authorize the President to provide hazard mitigation 
  assistance for mitigating and preventing post-wildfire flooding and 
                  debris flow, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hazard and Flooding Mitigation 
Funding Assurance Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO IMPROVE HAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 404 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief And Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170c) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``The President may 
        contribute up to 75 percent of the cost'' and inserting ``The 
        President shall contribute not less than 75 percent of the cost 
        and may contribute not more than 100 percent of the cost''; and
            (2) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) in paragraph (13), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (14), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(15) mitigating post-wildfire flooding and debris flow 
        from burn scars.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply 
with respect to assistance provided under section 404 of the Robert T. 
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170c) 
on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with Amendment No.




2

to the Annual Report of IceWEB, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K

/A

 for the year ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Hal Compton, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  January




30

, 2014/s/ Hal Compton, Sr.Hal Compton, Sr., Chief Executive Officer andprincipal executive officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Rio Vista Energy Partners L.P. ("Rio
Vista")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  Richard  Shore,  Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Rio Vista GP LLC,
the  general  partner  of  Rio  Vista  and Ian T. Bothwell, Treasurer (Principal
Accounting  and Finance Officer) of Rio Vista GP LLC, the general partner of Rio
Vista,  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of Rio Vista.

                                        /s/  Richard  Shore,  Jr.
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Richard Shore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of
                                  Rio  Vista  GP LLC, the general partner of Rio
                                  Vista  Energy  L.P.
                                  November  22,  2004


                                        /s/  Ian  T.  Bothwell
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Ian  T.  Bothwell,  Treasurer  (Principal
                                  Accounting and Financial Officer) of Rio Vista
                                  GP  LLC,  the  general  partner  of  Rio Vista
                                  Energy  L.P.
                                  November  22,  2004


<PAGE>
#### Compton Shultz v. State.

179 So. 764.

Division A.

Opinion Filed March 10, 1938.

*758
      *Woodrow M. Melvin,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Tyrus A. Nor-wood,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Buford, J.

The writ of error in this case brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor.

A motion for continuance alleges that the accused was brought into open court dressed in the garb of a convict and in chains and, in such condition in the presence of the venire from which to be drawn a jury to serve in his trial, was arraigned and required to plead to the information filed against him.

Motions, though sworn to, are not self-proving, and there is nothing else in the record to show that this condition existed.

Every person is presumed to be innocent of the commission of crime and that presumption follows them through every stage of the trial until they shall have been convicted. It is therefore, highly improper to bring a person who has not been convicted of crime, clothed as a convict and bound in chains, into the presence of a venire or jury by whom he is to be tried for any criminal offense and when such condition is shown by the record to have obtained in many cases it might be sufficient ground for a reversal.

In this case the State relied upon circumstantial evidence for conviction and, without going into the evidence in detail, it is sufficient to say that the record fails to disclose evidence sufficient to satisfy the rule in such cases. In such cases the rule is:

> “If the facts in proof are equally consistent with some other rational conclusion than that of guilty, or if the evidence leaves it indifferent which of several hypotheses is true, or merely establishes some finite probability in favor *759of one hypothesis rather than another, such evidence cannot amount to proof, however great the probability may be. Parish v. State, 98 Fla. 877, 124 So. 444; Gustine v. State, 86 Fla. 24, 97 So. 207.”

See also Lee v. State, 96 Fla. 59, 117 So. 699.

For the reason stated, the judgment must be reversed and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Eixis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Chapman, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Brown, J., concurs in the conclusion.
(V. D. 18)

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 70156, etc.

(Decided September 9, 1955)

*Lane, Young & Fox (William H. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Geo. Stephen Leonard,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

-Wilson, Judge:

These matters are presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in *Manhattan Novelty Corp. et al.*v. *United States,*33 Cust. Ct. 472, Abstract 58616. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matters be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement. pursuant tp .the .provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made, a part hereof.

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise. •

' .The actions having been abandoned insofar as all other items of merchandise are concerned, to that extent they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

> *367Schedule “A”

> 

> *368
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*The Boston and Albany Railroad Company, *Respondent, v.*John J. Wilbor, *Supervisor, etc.,*and others, *Appellants.*

Order affirmed, with costs. Learned, P. J., not acting.
EX-32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



INFe- HUMAN RESOURCES, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of INFe- Human Resources, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur Viola, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of INFe- Human Resources, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of INFe-Human Resources, Inc.



/s/    ARTHUR VIOLA

- --------------------

Arthur Viola



Chief Executive Officer

Sole Director

and Chief Financial Officer



October 22, 2007
#### Alfred A. Howlett, *Respondent, v.*The New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company and others, *Appellants.*

Order affirmed upon opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Merwin at Special Term, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 32.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Managed Futures Index
Series.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                          
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                              
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                            
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                             
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                 
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 11, 2010
EX-10.33




 Exhibit 10.33 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 

CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN 

SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

P53 Inc. 
 Option
Agreement 
 Extension 

MGH Case No. 1289 
 Agreement
No. A216775 
 The parties to that certain Option Agreement effective as of
May 28th, 2013, hereby agree that pursuant to Article, 1.2 therein, to extend the Option granted to p53, Inc., now known as MultiVir, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for a period of six months
from May 28, 2014. Accordingly, MultiVir’s Option shall expire on November 28, 2014. 
 All other terms and conditions of the
Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Extension Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the Option Agreement and made a part thereof. 

MultiVir shall forward by check the $[***] consideration for this extension of its option from the Hospital within 5 working days of the
execution of this Extension. 
 In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized
representatives as of the effective date first above written. 
  

					
	For Hospital:	 		 	For P53:
			
	 /s/ Irene Abrams
	 		 	 /s/ Robert E. Sobol

	Irene Abrams	 		 	Robert E. Sobol, MD
	Executive Director	 		 	President and CEO
	Partners Healthcare	 		 	
	Research Ventures & Licensing	 		 	


  

	***	Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions