alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 7,943.

#### In re KRUM.

[7 Ben. 5.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

July, 1873.

Preference — Judgment.

On March 26th, 1872, a judgment was recovered against K. upon a promissory note given for merchandise. It was recovered in hostility to K., and without any knowledge on the part of the judgment creditor that K. was not solvent. K., at the time, was the owner of real estate. On July 10th, 1872, a petition in bankruptcy was filed against K. and the assignee in bankruptcy after-wards sold the real estate. The judgment creditor claimed that the judgment should be paid in full by the assignee, out of the proceeds of the sales: *Held,*that the transaction was prima facie fraudulent under the act [of 1867 (14 Stat. 517)], and that the debt could not be paid in full.

This matter was presented to the judge on a statement of facts agreed upon between the assignee in bankruptcy and creditors who held a judgment. The judgment was recovered on March 26th, 1872, against [Uriah] Krum, the bankrupt, and was on the same , day docketed in the county clerk’s office of Ulster county. The judgment was recovered on a promissory note given for merchandise. It was recovered in hostility to Krum, and without any understanding with him, and without any knowledge on the part of the plaintiffs that Krum-was not solvent. At that time Krum owned a farm in Ulster county. On July 19th a petition in bankruptcy was filed against Krum, in which proceedings an assignee was appointed, who sold the farm and received the proceeds. The assets were not sufficient to pay the bankrupt’s creditors in full. The judgment creditors claimed that the judgment should be paid in full out of the proceeds of the real estate.

1

 [Reported by Robert D. Benedict, Esq., and B. Lincoln Benedict, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.]

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The transaction seems to have been one out of the usual and ordinary course of business of the debtor, and, therefore, prima facie fraudulent, under the act. I see nothing to rebut that presumption, and therefore do not see how the debt can be paid in full.
EXHIBIT 13.3




Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 USC §1350,


as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 of Metalink Ltd. (the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Shay Evron, co-Chief Financial Officer, certify that:




1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: July 15, 2011
 
 By: /s/Shay Evron



Name:Shay Evron

Title: co-Chief Financial Officer
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 29 73

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ W il li am Bren t M ay

bi n
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Co riz on Heal th care ; Dr. Will ia m McKen ne y
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - St . Lou is

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Sep te m

be r 20 , 20 18 Fi le d: Sep te m

be r 25 , 20 18 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BOW MAN, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Mi ss ou ri in m at e W il li am B r e n t Maybin ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s 1 ad ve rs e gr an t of su m

m ary jud gm en t in hi s 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n. In Maybin ’s va gu e an d

1 The Hon or ab le Caro le E. Ja ck so n, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e East ern Dis tri ct of M is so ur i, n ow re ti red

.co nc lu so ry br ie f, he id en ti fie s no sp eci fic erro rs in th e di st ri c t c ou rt’s th or ou gh

su m m ary of th e ev id en ce th e pa rti es pr es en te d, or in th e co ur t’s ap pl ic at io n of Eig ht h Am en dm en t pr eced en t to th at ev id en ce; an d, vi ewin g th e su m m ary jud gm en t reco rd in a li gh t m os t fav or ab le to Maybin , an d dr awin g al l reas on ab le in fere nc es in hi s fav or , we fin d no su ch erro rs

. See Mu rch is on v. Rog ers , 77 9 F.3d 88 2, 88 6- 87 (8 th Ci r. 20 15 ) (d e n ov o re vi ew). The jud gm en t i s af fir m ed

. See 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1298 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NE-39-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update 

accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Conduct record 

search 1.0 $ 85.00 $ 85.00 5,000 $425,000.00

Disassemble/reasse

mble reduction 

gearbox

10.0 $ 850.00 $ 850.00 10 $8,500.00

Replace sun and 

planetary gears

16.0 $1,360.0

0

$14,500 $15,860.00 40 $634,400.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,067,900

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs: 

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated 

Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain

for either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements 

for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
**EXHIBIT 32.2** **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the    undersigned officer of NNN 2003 Value Fund, LLC (the    “Company”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company. /s/  Steven    S. Fradin    Steven S. Fradin*Chief Accounting Officer**(principal accounting officer)*     Date: August 11, 2006     A signed original of this written statement required by    Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be    retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and    Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.     The foregoing certification is being furnished with the    Company’s    Form 10-Q    for the period ended June 30, 2006 pursuant to    18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for    purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference    into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the    date hereof, regardless of any general information language in    such filing.
No. 52349.

protests 497230-G, etc. (New York).

#### Kay Flo Glove Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiffs was therefore sustained.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Walker, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 961]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Mazur, J.), rendered on or about December 9, 1993, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,753] 

                    By application dated January 13, 2007, a state representative requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on February 16, 2007 and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 27, 2007 (72 FR 8795).                 

The negative determination was based on the Department's findings that that the petitioning workers of this firm or subdivision do not produce an article within the meaning of Section 222 of the Act. 

The Department reviewed the request for reconsideration and has determined that the petitioner has provided additional information. Therefore, the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974. 

## Conclusion 

                    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify                           ( print page 13527)                        reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.                 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th of March, 2007. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E7-5239 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 61925

#### United China & Glass Company *v.*United States,

protest 316246-K/15070 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with the stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are articles, other than tableware, valued under $3 per dozen, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Download Search Adjustment Results for a Deposit

To download the search results of a deposit, complete the following steps:

1. The Search Results table appears, click Download as shown in Figure 1. The Download 

Deposits page appears.

Figure 1. Download Button

2. Select either the XML file or CSV file format.

3. Verify your desired attributes for download:

• Deposit Information

• Financial Institution Information

• Agency Information

• Accounting Subtotals and User Defined Data

• Foreign Deposit Information

4. Click Submit. The File Download dialog box appears.

5. Click Open or Save.

• Click Open and the content of the file appears. 

• Click Save to choose the location where you will save the file.

Click Cancel to return to the OTCnet Home Page. No data is saved. 

Application Tips

Additional Button
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF				PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF				HYBRID DYNAMICS CORPORATION				PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Darren Jensen, Principal Accounting Officer of Hybrid Dynamics Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Company fully complies with the requirements of that section.				I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial operations and results of operations of the Company.

| Date:  May 12, 2008                                                                                                                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                 |
| By:  /s/ DARREN JENSEN                      |
| Darren Jensen                                                                                                                                             |
| Principal Accounting Officer                                                                                                                              |

----
No. 49735.

#### Protests 85988-K, etc., of Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same as that the subject of Abstract 49414 that claim in the protests was sustained.
**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
      OF CUSTODIAN
 
 In
      connection with the Annual Report of*Turner
      Valley Oil & Gas, Inc.*.,
      a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-KSB for the year ended
      December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the "Report"), I,Christopher
      Paton-Gay,
      Sole Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my
      knowledge:
 
 (1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
 (2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material
 respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Dated:
April 14, 2005
 
 /s/Christopher Paton-Gay
Christopher
Paton-Gay
president/director/Sole
Officer
#### Mary Boyle, *Administratrix, etc.,*Respondent, *v.*Bessie B. St. John, *Executrix, etc., Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

(No. 2.)

Judgment and order overruling demurrer of Bessie B. St. John affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Barnard, P. J.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2332
WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-43-2) Submitted: February 3, 2006 Decided: February 13, 2006 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William C. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Rafael Melendez, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William C. Thompson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Commissioner and affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater , 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error or abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the order on the reasoning of the district court. See Thompson v. Commissioner, Soc. Sec. Admin. , No. CA-04-43-2 (W.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2005). We also deny Thompson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jack E. Barker, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[635 NYS2d 554]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same Memorandum as in *People v Barker*(221 AD2d 1018 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Bradstreet, J.— Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3299

_____________________________
M ARIO B ARKE

- J ERMAIN B RYANT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Linda F. McCallum , Judge

. June 5, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , R AY , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.33 0 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Matthew R. McLain of McLain Law, P.A., Longwood
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned,
certifies that to the best of his knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and its results of operations for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Tammie A. Quinlan                               
|Date: August 13, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | TAMMIE A. QUINLAN                                   
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.12

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
the Frontier Masters Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Frontier Masters Series.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                    
|Robert J. Enck President
and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Masters Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                                      
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                       
|Brent Bales Chief Financial
Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Frontier Masters Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund                 

Date: May 12, 2011