alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1
  Mediacom
    Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries
  Schedule
    of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
  For the Years Ended December 31,2008


2007


2006


2005


2004(In thousands, except ratio amounts)Earnings:(Loss) income before income taxes

$
(19,281
)

$
(37,563
)

$
(65,188
)

$
(24,966
)

$
13,628Interest expense, net


213,333



239,015



227,206



208,264



192,740Amortization of capitalized interest


2,872



3,069



2,678



2,357



2,055Amortization of debt issuance costs


5,070



4,884



5,998



8,613



8,725Interest component of rent
    expense(1)


6,289



5,787



5,755



5,267



4,931Earnings available for fixed charges

$
208,283


$
215,192


$
176,449


$
199,535


$
222,079Fixed Charges:Interest expense, net

$
213,333


$
239,015


$
227,206


$
208,264


$
192,740Capitalized interest


4,273



3,818



3,603



3,756



3,012Amortization of debt issuance cost


5,070



4,884



5,998



8,613



8,725Interest component of rent
    expense(1)


6,289



5,787



5,755



5,267



4,931Total fixed charges

$
228,965


$
253,504


$
242,562


$
225,900


$
209,408Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


















1.06Deficiency of earnings over fixed charges

$
(20,682
)

$
(38,312
)

$
(66,113
)

$
(26,365
)

$
12,671     (1)
    
    A reasonable approximation (one-third) is deemed to be the
    interest factor included in rental expense.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-223 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NARCOTIC DRUGS 

Cooperating Nation Information 

Exchange System 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Port of Spain October 6, 2004 and 

February 23, 2005 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 

 Narcotic Drugs: Cooperating Nation 

 Information Exchange System 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 Port of Spain October 6, 2004 and February 23, 2005; 

 Entered into force February 23, 2005.
September 8, 1944

No. 49709.

Suit 4445.

#### United *States*v. *William Herman Wepner.*

*C.*D. 733 affirmed (32 C. C. P. A. 30, C. A. D. 282).
Exhibit12.2

CERTIFICATIONS

Certification of theChief Financial Officer

I, Nigel Addison Smith, certifythat:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form20-F of ebookers plc:

2.    Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

4.    The company's other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-14 and 15d-14) for the company and have:

a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany's disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)    disclosed in thisreport any change in the company's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by thereport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company's internal report over financialreporting.

5.    The company's other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company'sauditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the company's ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the company's auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

b)    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company's internal controls.

Date: March 25, 2004

|  | /s/ NIGEL ADDISONSMITH |
|--|------------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|  | NIGELADDISON SMITH Chief Financial Officer |
|--|--------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Surgical Holdings, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Zak W. Elgamal, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o (d));
      and2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of American
      Surgical Holdings, Inc.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




AMERICAN
SURGICAL HOLDINGS, INC.




By:
            /s/
      Zak W. ElgamalZAK
      ELGAMALPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)




Date:
August 18, 2008
No. 64212.

protests 60/1661 (B) and 60/1661 (C) (New York).

#### The Coldwater Seafood Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Hermann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 47938.

#### Protest 87834-K of Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

There was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff when the case was called for trial. The protest was therefore ordered submitted. Nothing having been found in the record to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the protest was overruled.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEO ROGAN AND JOSEPH A. SODANO, DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

*Mr. Norman Fischhein*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Joseph P. Lordi*and *Mr. Alan Silber*for the respondent.

May 14, 1968.

Denied.
H. R. 8219 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to assess the suitability 

and feasibility of designating certain land as the Lahaina National Heritage 

Area, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lahaina National Heritage Area 

Study Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

In this Act: 

(1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

of the Interior. 

(2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State of Hawaii. 

(3) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ means the censusdesignated place of Lahaina in Maui County in the State. 

SEC. 3. LAHAINA NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA STUDY. 

The Secretary, in coordination with the County of Maui and 

in consultation with State and local historic preservation officers, 

State and local historical societies, State and local tourism offices, 

and other appropriate organizations and governmental agencies, 

shall carry out, in accordance with section 120103(a) of title 54, 

United States Code, a study to assess the suitability and feasibility 

of designating the study area as a National Heritage Area, to 

be known as the ‘‘Lahaina National Heritage Area’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Interchange Corporation.
 Date: August 12, 2005
    
    /s/ Heath B. ClarkeHeath B. ClarkeChief Executive Officer and Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Douglas S. NormanDouglas S. NormanChief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Tammie A. Quinlan, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and its results of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2004.



|                       |  |                       |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | /s/ Tammie A. Quinlan
|Date: October 25, 2004 |  | Name:                 |  | Tammie A. Quinlan                                
|                       |  | Title:                |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



21
# C_2007153EN.01002101.xml

| 6.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/21

---

Update of list of national services responsible for border controls for the purposes of Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) as published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 247 of 13 October 2006, p. 17

Official Journal of the European Union

(2007/C 153/05)

The publication of list of national services responsible for border controls for the purposes of Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the commission in conformity with Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code.

In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a monthly update is available on the website of Directorate General Justice, Freedom and Security.

MALTA

New State service responsible for border control:

Armed Forces of Malta.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 56 (Friday, March 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5318]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-5192-000]


Powell, Fred G.; Notice of Filing

March 19, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 8, 2007, Fred G. Powell filed an 
application for authority to hold interlocking positions pursuant to 
Section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 825d(b)), 18 CFR 
45.8 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, and Order No. 664.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c6a697e6f6342404542497f595c5c435e586c4a495e4f024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="266063746569484a4f484375535656495452664043544508414950">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 9, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5318 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ernest Jerome Henry, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 382]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated July 20, 1987 *(People v Henry,*132 AD2d 673), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered November 8, 1984, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
No. 65528.

#### The Spiegel Bros. Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 60/23516 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in the case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was, therefore, overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                         580,607
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  433,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,212,837
<PP&E>                                       2,096,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                 578,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,304,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,791,498
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,316
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,518,929)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,304,390
<SALES>                                      8,615,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,615,092
<CGS>                                        9,223,258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,223,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,280,280
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,816,112
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,816,112
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,816,112
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)



</TABLE>
June 25, 1941

No. 46147.

Suit 4352.

#### United *States*v. *Italian Furniture Frame Corp. et al.*

Reap. Dec. 5109 dismissed on stipulation May 2,1941; not yet reported.
No. 63123.

#### Wm. A. Hausman Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 237005-K, etc. (Seattle).

*403Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fresh or frozen boneless pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 59714, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 10.39

Gerald P. Krueger, Ph.D., CPE
Krueger Ergonomics Research Consulting
4105 Komes Court
Alexandria, VA  22306

January 26, 1999

Dear Jerry:

         As we discussed UTEK Corporation would like to engage your services as
an independent marketing representative. Your duties would be to introduce UTEK
to CEO's of public companies for the purpose of having UTEK be engaged by these
companies to find, acquire and transfer technology licenses to them. Your
services will be rendered as an independent contractor and not as an employee of
UTEK. I will provide some assistance to you to help ensure that you can make a
knowledgeable and effective sales presentation.

         We would like you to provide these services on a time available basis,
where you decide how much effort and time you will spend soliciting
prospects/customers for UTEK. You are free to provide these services at a
location of your choice. You must cover your own expenses while providing this
service. However, UTEK will reimburse you for any postage incurred in soliciting
prospects.

         In consideration for providing this service to the company, UTEK will
compensate you with 10% of any monies or stock received from a customer you
introduce to UTEK, within one week following the closing of a technology
transfer agreement between this customer and UTEK.

         The term of this Agreement is 12 months. This Agreement may be
cancelled by either party upon 90 days notice.

         This Agreement is governed by the Laws of the State of Florida.

         If you agree with all of the above terms, please sign and send a copy
of this letter to me. Jerry, I really look forward to working with you again in
the months to come.

Very best regards,


/s/  Clifford


Clifford M. Gross, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer


Agreed to:


 /s/  Gerald P. Krueger
---------------------------------
Dr. Gerald P. Krueger, Ph.D., CPE


   January 30, 1999
-----------------------
Date
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, William D. Eglin, Chief Financial Officer of MD
Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of MD Technologies Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MD
Technologies Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 10, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ William D. Eglin   
|                      |  |  |  | William D. Eglin       
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer