Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 51 / Friday, March 16, 2007 / Notices 12609 

The OMB control numbers for EPA’s 

regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after 

appearing in the Federal Register when 

approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, 

and displayed either by publication in 

the Federal Register or by other 

appropriate means, such as on the 

related collection instrument or form, if 

applicable. The display of OMB control 

numbers in certain EPA regulations is 

consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. 

Abstract: The New Source 

Performance Standards (NSPS) for 

Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids 

for which Construction, Reconstruction 

or Modification Commenced after June 

11, 1973, and prior to May 19, 1978 

were proposed on June 11, 1973, and 

promulgated on March 8, 1974. These 

regulations apply to facilities that store 

petroleum liquids in storage vessels 

with a storage capacity greater than 

151,416 liters (40,000 gallons) 

including: storage vessels with capacity 

greater than 151,416 liters (40,000 

gallons) but not exceeding 246,052 liters 

(65,000 gallons), and where 

construction or modification 

commenced after March 8, 1974, and 

prior to May 19, 1978; and storage 

vessels that have a capacity greater than 

246,052 liters (65,000 gallons), and 

where construction or modification 

commenced after June 11, 1973, and 

prior to May 19, 1978. Facilities that are 

not subject to these standards are 

storage vessels of petroleum or 

condensate stored, processed, and/or 

treated at a drilling and production 

facility prior to custody transfer. This 

information is being collected to assure 

compliance with 40 CFR part 60, 

subpart K. 

In general, all NSPS standards require 

initial notifications, performance tests, 

and periodic reports. Affected facilities 

report only if a storage vessel is no 

longer subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart 

K and will become subject to the current 

storage vessel standard, 40 CFR part 60, 

subpart Kb. The NSPS subpart K 

standards also require the owner/ 

operator to document (recordkeeping) 

the activities of the storage period, the 

maximum true vapor pressure, and the 

type of petroleum liquid stored. This 

information is recorded only when a 

petroleum liquid is changed in the 

storage vessel. Owners or operators are 

also required to maintain records of the 

occurrence and duration of any startup, 

shutdown, or malfunction in the 

operation of an affected facility, or any 

period during which the monitoring 

system is inoperative. These 

notifications, reports, and records are 

essential in determining compliance, 

and required of all sources subject to 

NSPS. 

Any owner or operator subject to the 

provisions of this part shall maintain a 

file of these measurements, and retain 

the file for at least two years following 

the date of such measurements, 

maintenance reports, and records. All 

reports are sent to the delegated state or 

local authority. In the event that there 

is no such delegated authority, the 

reports are sent directly to the United 

States Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) regional office. 

Burden Statement: The annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

this collection of information is 

estimated to average 3.5 hours per 

response. Burden means the total time, 

effort, or financial resources expended 

by persons to generate, maintain, retain, 

or disclose or provide information to or 

for a Federal agency. This includes the 

time needed to review instructions; 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize 

technology and systems for the purposes 

of collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 

requirements which have subsequently 

changed; train personnel to be able to 

respond to a collection of information; 

search data sources; complete and 

review the collection of information; 

and transmit or otherwise disclose the 

information. 

Respondents/Affected Entities: 

Owners or operators of facilities that 

store petroleum liquids for which 

construction, reconstruction or 

modification commenced after June 11, 

1973, and prior to May 19, 1978. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

220. 

Frequency of Response: Initially, on 

Occasion. 

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 

769 hours. 

Estimated Total Annualized Cost: 

$65,142, which includes $0 annualized 

capital startup costs, $0 Operating and 

Maintenance Costs (O&M) and $65,142 

annual labor costs. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is a 

small increase of 100 in the labor hours 

and no change in the annualized cost, 

which includes capital/startup and 

operation and maintenance costs, in this 

ICR compared to the previous ICR. This 

is due to two considerations. First, the 

regulations have not changed over the 

past three years and are not anticipated 

to change over the next three years. 

Secondly, the growth rate for the 

industry is very low, negative or nonexistent, so there is no significant 

change in the overall burden. Since 

there are no changes in the regulatory 

requirements and there is no significant 

industry growth, the slight increase in 

the labor hours is only due to the 

inclusion of managerial and clerical 

hours and updating of the technical 

labor rate. In addition, there is no 

change in the annualized cost in this 

renewal when compared to the previous 

ICR. 

Dated: March 7, 2007. 

Oscar Morales, 

Director, Collection Strategies Division. 

[FR Doc. E7–4857 Filed 3–15–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–6685–1] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

202–564–7167. 

An explanation of the ratings assigned 

to draft environmental impact 

statements (EISs) was published in FR 

dated April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17845). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20060431, ERP No. D–COE–

E67005–NC, PCS Phosphate Mine 

Continuation, Proposes Continued 

Mining of the Phosphate Reserve in 

an Economically Viable Fashion, 

Beaufort County, NC 

Summary: EPA objected to issuance of 

a permit for the applicant-preferred 

alternative, which would impact 2,408 

acres of waters/wetlands of the U.S. and 

7.3 miles of streams. EPA noted that the 

applicant-preferred alternative is the 

most environmentally damaging of the 

alternatives that were evaluated and 

would represent one of the largest 

wetland acreage loss ever permitted in 

North Carolina. EPA encouraged the 

Corps to determine if there may be 

another alternative that would have less 

environmental impact and still be 

practicable, and recommended specific 

refinements to other alternatives. EPA 

requested information in the Final EIS, 

including additional information about 

the economic analyses, determination of 

appropriate stream mitigation ratios, 

clarification of phosphogypsum stack 

impacts on surficial aquifers, and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
12610 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 51 / Friday, March 16, 2007 / Notices 

mitigation of elevated cadmium in 

reclamation sites. 

Rating EO2. 

EIS No. 20060471, ERP No. D–FHW–

F40812–IL, Prairie Parkway Study, 

Transportation System Improvement 

between Interstate 80 (I–80) and 

Interstate 88 (I–88) Grundy, Kendall 

and Kane Counties, IL 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about direct 

and indirect impacts to wetlands, 

streams and forests, as well as 

cumulative impacts. 

Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20060542, ERP No. D–FRC–

L05239–00, Spokane River and Post 

Falls Hydroelectric Project, 

Applications for two New Licenses for 

Existing 14.75 (mw) Post Falls No. 

12606 and 122.9 (mw) Spokane River 

No. 2545, Kootenai and Benewah 

Counties, ID and Spokane, Lincoln 

and Stevens Counties, WA 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about 

degradation of water quality from the 

proposed relicensing, and requested 

additional information on metal 

contaminants and sediment supply/ 

transport in the project area. 

Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20070008, ERP No. D–AFS–

K61165–00, Great Basin Creek South 

Rangeland Management Projects, 

Management of 12 Livestock Grazing 

Allotments, Bridgeport Ranger 

District, Lyon and Mineral Counties, 

NV and Mono County, CA 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about the 

proposed management actions and the 

potential environmental impacts of 

these actions. EPA requested additional 

site- and allotment-specific information 

and an expedited implementation of 

corrective management measures where 

ecosystem and rangeland functions are 

known to be impaired. 

Rating EC2. 

Final EISs 

EIS No. 20060537, ERP No. F–COE–

K36143–CA, American River 

Watershed, Lower American River 

Common Features Mayhew Levee 

Project, Reconstruction, Sacramento 

County, CA 

Summary: No formal comment letter 

was sent to the preparing agency. 

EIS No. 20060544, ERP No. F–FRC–

C05149–NY, Niagara Project, 

Hydroelectric Relicensing Application 

FERC No. 2216, Niagara River, 

Niagara County, NY 

Summary: The Final EIS addressed 

EPA’s earlier concerns regarding 

potential cumulative impacts to water 

levels; therefore, EPA does not object to 

the proposed relicensing. 

EIS No. 20070017, ERP No. F–NRC–

C06016–NJ, GENERIC—License 

Renewal of Nuclear Plants (GEIS) 

Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear 

Generating Station Supplement 28 to 

NUREG–1437, Located adjacent to 

Barnegat Bay, Lacy and Ocean 

Townships, Ocean County, NJ 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about the use of 

outdated ichthyoplankton and 

zooplankton studies. EPA is also 

concerned about the lack of a complete 

evaluation of the environmental effects 

from the continued operation of the 

facility based on these studies. 

EIS No. 20070027, ERP No. F–FRC–

K05061–CA, Lake Elsinore Advanced 

Pumped Storage (LEAPS) Project, 

Construction and Operation, 

Application for Hydroelectric License, 

Special-Use-Permit, FERC No.11858, 

City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside 

County, CA 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about the 

potential significant adverse impacts to 

air, water, and habitat resources; and 

recommended a number of mitigation 

measures to minimize the potential 

impacts. 

EIS No. 20070031, ERP No. F–AFS–

K39101–CA, Lake Davis Pike 

Eradication Project, To Eradicate Pike 

and Re-Establish Trout Fishery in the 

Tributaries, Special-Use-Permit, 

Plumas National Forest, Plumas 

County, CA 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about the 

tradeoffs from the neutralization process 

and the mechanisms that will avoid 

reintroduction of the species. 

EIS No. 20070045, ERP No. F–FHW–

J40174–UT, Riverdale Road Project 

(UT–26), Improvement Mobility and 

Safety between 1900 West in Roy, UT 

and U.S. Highway 89 (Washington 

Boulevard) in Odgen, UT, Cities of 

Roy, Riverdale, South Ogden and 

Ogden, Weber County, UT 

Summary: No formal comment letter 

was sent to the preparing agency. 

Dated: March 13, 2007. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E7–4859 Filed 3–15–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–6684–9] 

Environmental Impacts Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–7167 or http://www.epa.gov/ 

compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of 

Environmental Impact Statements. Filed 

03/05/2007 through 03/09/2007. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

EIS No. 20070088, Draft EIS, AFS, WY, 

Eagle Prospect Exploratory Wells 

Project, Proposes to Drill up to 3 

Exploratory Oil and Gas Wells, Big 

Piney Ranger District, Bridger-Teton 

National Forest, Sublette County, WY, 

Comment Period Ends: 04/30/2007, 

Contact: Teresa Trulock 307–367–

4326. 

EIS No. 20070089, Draft EIS, MMS, 00, 

Programmatic—Alternative Energy 

Development and Production and 

Alternate Use of Facilities on the 

Outer Continental Shelf, 

Implementation, Atlantic, Gulf of 

Mexico, Pacific and Alaska, Comment 

Period Ends: 05/15/2007, Contact: 

Mary Boatman 703–787–1662. 

EIS No. 20070090, Final EIS, AFS, SD, 

Dakota Prairie Grasslands Noxious 

Weed Management Project, 

Implementation, Billings, Slope, 

Golden Valley, Sioux, Grant, 

McHenry, Ransom and Richland 

Counties, ND and Corson, Perkins, 

and Ziebach Counties, SD, Wait 

Period Ends: 04/16/2007, Contact: 

Sheila McNee 701–250–4443. 

EIS No. 20070091, Draft EIS, NPS, MN, 

Pipestone National Monument 

General Management Plan, 

Implementation, Pipestone County, 

MN, Comment Period Ends: 05/15/ 

2007, Contact: Nick Chevance 402–

661–1844. 

EIS No. 20070092, Draft Supplement, 

COE, FL, Central and Southern 

Florida Project, Tamiami Trail 

Modifications, Modified Water 

Deliveries to Everglades National 

Park, Acquisition of Real Estate Rights 

to Portions of Privately Owned 

Properties along the Tamiami Trail, 

Dade County, FL, Comment Period 

Ends: 05/07/2007, Contact: Barbara 

Cintron 904–232–1692. 

EIS No. 20070093, Final EIS, CGB, CA, 

Cabrillo Port Liquefied Natural Gas 

(LNG) Deepwater Port, Construction 

and Operation an Offshore Floating 

Storage and Regasification Unit 

(FSRU), Application for License, 

Ventura and Los Angeles Counties, 

CA, Wait Period Ends: 04/30/2007, 

Contact: Ray Martin 202–372–1449 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES