alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 58089.

protests 187159-K, etc. (Galveston).

#### Humble Oil & Refining Co. and W. R. Zanes *&*Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel casings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 32, C. D. 1577), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v PAUL T. GINAITT, Private First Class, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

20 USCMA 216, 43 CMR 56

No. 23,220

December 18, 1970

*Captain Paul A. Reichs,*USMCR, Accused. was on the pleadings for Appellant,

*Commander Michael F. Fasanaro,*ings for Appellee, United States. *Jr.,*JAGC, USN, was on the plead-

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Of the two issues granted in this case, only one requires attention. Failure of the appellant to request trial by military judge alone, in writing, before or at the inception of trial constitutes a jurisdictional defect rendering the findings and sentence invalid. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).

Accordingly, the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review is reversed. The findings of guilty and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. Another trial may be ordered.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Quinn, Chief Judge

(dissenting) :

I would sustain the jurisdiction of the court-martial for the reasons set out in my dissent in United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970), and affirm the sufficiency of the advice as to the right to counsel for the reasons specified in United States v Turner, 20 USCMA 167, 43 CMR 7 (1970).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019 (the “Report”) of Oxford Square Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Jonathan H. Cohen   | 
|----------------------- | 
|Name: Jonathan H. Cohen | 
|Date: May 1, 2019       |
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**FastenTech, Inc. and Subsidiaries**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Michael R. Elia, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FastenTech, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 15, 2005
No. 64943.

#### J. B. Wood Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/465 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BRYAN R. LOVE,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

CHESTER COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 70 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4 th day of November , 2022, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5243]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-922-07-1310-FI; COC64227]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease COC64227 from Tatonka 
Oil and Gas, LLC for lands in Moffat County, Colorado. The petition was 
filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date 
the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Milada 
Krasilinec, Land Law Examiner, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, 
at 303.239.3767.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $20.00 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 18\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease COC64227 effective December 1, 2006, under the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above.

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Milada Krasilinec,
Land Law Examiner.
 [FR Doc. E7-5243 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0383

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TYLER THOMAS BUTTOLPH,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 5, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 29 2022

06/29/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0383
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of NNN 2003 Value Fund, LLC (the“Company”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:          (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of    the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and           (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Kelly J. Caskey       Kelly J. Caskey *Chief Financial Officer*Date: November 14, 2005     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.     The foregoing certification is being furnished with theCompany’s Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005 pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general information language in suchfiling.
Case No. 6,382.

#### GIBBONS v. SLOANE.

[6 McLean,*273;*
      *1*
      **4 Am. Law Reg. 187.]

Circuit Court, D. Ohio.

Oct. Term, 1854.

Slavery — Power op Attorney to Make Arrest.

This suit was brought [by Charles M. Gibbons against Rush R. Sloane] to recover the value of a slave owned by the plaintiff, who-escaped and was rescued at the same time- and under the same circumstances, as in the case of Weimer v. Sloane [Case No. 17,303]. The evidence was the same in both cases, except as to the manner of the execution of the power of attorney to Patton, who made the arrest as the agent of Gibbons; and by the consent of the counsel, both cases were submitted to the jury at the same time. In this case, it appeared that Gibbons had executed a power of attorney in the state of Kentucky, as required by the act of congress, in which either no name was inserted as the agent of the plaintiff, or, if any, ihat of some person other than Patton; and that afterwards and before the arrest of the-fugitive by Patton, his name was inserted by the plaintiff or- some other person, at Sandusky city, in the state of Ohio, without any acknowledgment of the instrument in that state. The court instructed the jury, that under the act of 1850 [9 Stat. 462], this was not a valid power to Patton, and did not authorize him to make the arrest. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant.
446 A.2d 668

#### Commonwealth v. Calicat a/k/a Calicut, Appellant.

Submitted June 13, 1980.

Ronald F. O’Driscoll, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Ronald T. Williamson, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, WICKERSHAM and LIPEZ, JJ.

The order entered November 10, 1977, is affirmed on the comprehensive opinion of the Honorable Frederick B. Smillie.
#### In the Matter of Frank Macina, Jr., Appellant, v North Salem Central School District, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 596]

*539—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent dated November 9, 1993, terminating the petitioner’s employment, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Leavitt, J.), entered June 17, 1994, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner was employed by the respondent as a cleaner. On November 9, 1993, following prior disciplinary warnings, the petitioner’s employment was terminated because of an incident that had taken place while he was working at the North Salem Middle/High School. Thereafter, the petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 claiming, *inter alia,*that the determination terminating his employment should be annulled because he had been deprived of his right to pre-termination and post-termination hearings and a name-clearing hearing. The Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding. We affirm.

The petitioner was not entitled to pre-termination or post-termination hearings pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 because he held an unclassified and at-will position *(see,*Civil Service Law § 75; *Matter of Tyson v Hess,*109 AD2d 1068, *affd*66 NY2d 943). Moreover, the petitioner did not have a constitutionally protected property interest entitling him to such a hearing *(see, Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v Loudermill,*470 US 532; *Matter of Ragone v Board of Educ.,*194 AD2d 731).

The petitioner was not entitled to a name-clearing hearing as there has been no public disclosure of any allegations affecting the petitioner’s good name or reputation *(see, Meyers v City of New York,*208 AD2d 258; *cf., Brandt v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs.,*820 F2d 41).

The action taken by the respondent in terminating the petitioner’s employment was not arbitrary and capricious because the record shows that there was a rational basis for it, and the termination was carried out in good faith *(see, Matter of Juan v County of Suffolk,*209 AD2d 523). Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
April 21, 1955

No. 59009.

Suit 4835.

#### A. V. Olsson Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1641. (Appeal dismissed March 9, 1955.)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Tammie A. Quinlan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certifies
that (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the
Company as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and its results of operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.



|                        |  |                       |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/ Tammie A. Quinlan
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | Name:                 |  | Tammie A. Quinlan                                   
|                        |  | Title:                |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 46197.

#### Protests 796202-G, etc., of Wm. Filene’s Sons Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Frank W. Wheeler, *Respondent, v.*The City of Poughkeepsie, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Order of reference vacated. Opinions by BarNAbd, P. J., and Dykman, J.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Marlin Business Services Corp.
 Date: May 6, 2011
 /s/ Daniel P. DyerDaniel P. DyerChief Executive Officer/s/ Lynne C. WilsonLynne C. WilsonChief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002. In connection with the Quarterly Report of HLI Operating Company, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Curtis J. Clawson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ CURTIS J. CLAWSONCurtis J. ClawsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 Date: December 15, 2004 49
Exhibit 10.7


 





MODIFICATION AGREEMENT


 


This Note Modification Agreement (this “Agreement”)
dated effective as of December 31, 2014, by and between Behringer Harvard Short-Term Opportunity Liquidating Trust (successor in
interest to Behringer Harvard Short-Term Opportunity Fund I LP), a Delaware liquidating trust (“Borrower”), and Behringer
Harvard Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Lender”).


 


WHEREAS, Borrower executed and delivered
to Lender that certain Fifth Amendment and Restated Unsecured Promissory Note dated March 29, 2011 (the “Note”) with
an original “Maturity Date” of March 29, 2014;


 


WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender executed
that certain Note Modification Agreement and Assignment of Proceeds dated July 5, 2012, whereby the “Maturity Date”
of the Note was extended until May 31, 2014;


 


WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender executed
a second Note Modification Agreement dated May 31, 2014, whereby the “Maturity Date” of the Note was further extended
until December 31, 2014; and


 


WHEREAS, in connection with a further
modification of the Note, Borrower and Lender have agreed to execute this Agreement;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
premises and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiently of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed by
the parties hereto, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	The Note is hereby modified to provide that the “Maturity Date” shall be December 31, 2015.



 


		2.	All other terms and conditions of the Note remain unchanged and in full force and effect.



 


[Signatures on next page]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is
executed below for and on behalf of the parties hereto as of the date first set forth above.


 





	 	BEHRINGER HARVARD SHORT-TERM OPPORTUNITY LIQUIDATING TRUST
	 	 
	 	By: 	Behringer Harvard Advisors II LP, its Managing Trustee




 





	 	 	By:	 
	 	 	 	M. Jason Mattox
	 	 	 	Executive Vice President









 


	 	BEHRINGER HARVARD HOLDINGS, LLC
	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	M. Jason Mattox
	 	 	Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President
EX-10.1


 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No. 6 (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into this 27th day of March, 2015 by and between Dover Motorsports,
Inc. and Nashville Speedway, USA, Inc. (collectively, the “Seller”) and NeXovation, Inc. (the “Purchaser”). 
 WHEREAS,
Seller and Purchaser entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated May 28, 2014, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated August 26, 2014, Amendment No. 2 dated October 7, 2014, Amendment No. 3
dated December 15, 2014, Amendment No. 4 dated January 13, 2015 which superseded Amendments No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3 (“Amendment No. 4”) and Amendment No. 5 dated February 20, 2015 which is
superseded by this Amendment No. 6, in which the Purchaser agreed to purchase from Seller the property known as Nashville Superspeedway; 

WHEREAS, unless otherwise defined herein, terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend the date for Closing, subject to the terms and conditions of this Amendment No. 6; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser do hereby agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Closing shall take place on or before May 27, 2015. 

  

	2.	Purchaser shall wire $400,000 to Seller on or before March 27, 2015. This non-refundable payment is in consideration of this Amendment. If Closing occurs, a prorated portion of this $400,000 payment shall be
applied against the Purchase Price calculated by subtracting from the $400,000 payment an amount equal to $6,666.66 for each day past March 27, 2015 that Closing takes place. 


 

	3.	Except as expressly modified above, the Agreement (as otherwise amended by Amendment No. 4) shall remain in full force and effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Purchaser have executed this Amendment the day and year first written above. 

 

			
	Purchaser: NeXovation, Inc.
		
	By:		 /s/ Michael B. Kinnard

			Michael B. Kinnard, EVP – General Counsel
	
	Seller: Nashville Speedway, USA, Inc.
		
	By:		 /s/ Klaus Belohoubek

			Klaus Belohoubek,
			Senior Vice President – General Counsel
	
	Seller: Dover Motorsports, Inc.
		
	By:		 /s/ Klaus Belohoubek

			Klaus Belohoubek,
			Senior Vice President – General Counsel
No. 41833.

#### Protest 81425-G of Salem Shawiry (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items in question consist of embroidered laces. The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was sustained as to these items.