11902 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 14, 2007 / Notices 

natural condition; and (5) the area offers 

outstanding opportunities for solitude 

or a primitive and unconfined type of 

recreation. 

As part of the Wilderness Suitability 

Assessment, the parks solicited public 

input on the suitability of the subject 

area for designation as Wilderness: a 

press release was sent out on August 12, 

2002 informing the public of the process 

with a description of the parcels, the 

criteria that need to be meet to merit 

inclusion, and an intitial September 27, 

2002 closing date; in concert with the 

distribution of the press release, some 

3,200 copies of the release were mailed 

to interested individuals and groups on 

the park’s General Management Plan 

mailing list. The public comment period 

was then extended to October 18, 2002. 

Dated: March 6, 2007. 

Daniel N. Wenk, 

Deputy Director. 

[FR Doc. 07–1181 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–69–M 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–597] 

In the Matter of Certain Bassinet 

Products; Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

February 9, 2007, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Arm’s Reach 

Concepts, Inc. of Malibu, California. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain bassinet products 

by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent 

Nos. 6,931,677 and Re. 39,136. The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

permanent exclusion order and a 

permanent cease and desist order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin 

Joffre, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–2550. 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 

210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2006). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

March 8, 2007, ordered that: 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain bassinet products 

by reason of infringement of one or 

more of claims 1–2, 5, 10–14, 16, and 

18–19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,931,677 and 

claims 1–2, 10, 15–16, 24, 29–31, and 

48–49 of U.S. Patent No. Re. 39,136, and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is—Arm’s Reach 

Concepts, Inc., 27162 Sea Vista Drive, 

Malibu, California 90625. 

(b) The respondent is the following 

entity alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Simplicity, Inc., 501 South Ninth Street, 

Reading, Pennsylvania 19602. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Erin Joffre, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Charles E. Bullock is 

designated as the presiding 

administrative law judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondent in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of the respondent to file a 

timely response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of a limited exclusion order or 

cease and desist order or both directed 

against the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 8, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–4656 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Submission for OMB Emergency 

Review; Comment Request 

March 7, 2007. 

The Department of Labor has 

submitted the following (see below) 

information collection request (ICR), 

utilizing emergency review procedures, 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and clearance in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (Pub.L. 

104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). OMB 

approval has been requested by March 

16, 2007. A copy of this ICR, with 

applicable supporting documentation, 

may be obtained by accessing it on: 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 14, 2007 / Notices 11903 

http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain, or by calling the Department 

of Labor Departmental Clearance 

Officer, Ira Mills, on 202–693–4122. 

Comments and questions about the 

ICR listed below should be submitted to 

the Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the 

Employment and Training 

Administration (ETA), Office of 

Management and Budget, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503 (202–395–7316), 

and received prior to the requested 

OMB approval date. 

The Office of Management and Budget 

is particularly interested in comments 

which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submissions 

of responses. 

Agency: Employment and Training 

Administration. 

Title: Evaluation of State 

Implementation of Section 303(k) of the 

Social Security Act. 

OMB Number: 1205–0NEW. 

Frequency: One-time Survey. 

Affected Public: State Government. 

Type of Response: Reporting. 

Number of Respondents: 53. 

Estimated Time Per Respondent: 2 

hours. 

Total Burden Hours: 106. 

Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): 0. 

Total Burden Cost (operating/ 

maintaining): 0. 

Description: The collection of this 

information is necessary to examine 

state implementation of section 303(k) 

of the Social Security Act (SSA) as to (1) 

status and effectiveness of state actions 

to meet the requirement of the law and 

operation guidance, and (2) whether the 

Secretary of Labor (Secretary) should 

recommend Congressional action to 

make revisions to the law. On August 9, 

2004, Public Law (Pub.L.) 108–295, the 

‘‘ State Unemployment Tax Act (SUTA) 

Dumping Prevention Act of 2004’’ (Act) 

was enacted which amended section 

303(k) of the SSA by establishing a 

minimum nationwide standard for 

curbing a unemployment compensation 

tax rate manipulation schemes known 

as SUTA dumping. The Act requires the 

Secretary of Labor to conduct a study of 

state implementation and report to 

Congress by July 15, 2007 at section 2, 

F(b)(1). ETA now requests emergency 

approval to enable ETA’s contractor 

sufficient time to distribute, collect, and 

analyze the state survey results and 

incorporate them into the study findings 

before the July 15, 2007, statutorily 

mandated submission date for the 

Secretary’s report to Congress. The 

timing of the survey design and review 

request corresponds with the states’

implementation of the detection 

systems, which began after enactment of 

the Federal law. If the survey design and 

distribution predated the 

implementation of state detection 

systems, states would be unable to 

provide useful data on the status and 

effectiveness of state actions to meet the 

requirement(s) of the Federal law and 

operation guidance. 

Ira L. Mills, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. E7–4567 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–23–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of February 26 through March 2, 

2007. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. The sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. Increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. There has been a shift in 

production by such workers’ firm or 

subdivision to a foreign country of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

articles which are produced by such 

firm or subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. The country to which the workers’

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. There has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) Significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES