alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

INFE- Human Resources, Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of INFE- Human Resources, Inc. (INFE-HR)
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending Febuary 29, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur
Viola, Chief Executive Officer of INFE-HR, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the amended Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    INFE-HR.

/s/    ARTHUR VIOLA
--------------------
       Arthur Viola      Chief Executive Officer        May 24, 2004
                         Sole Director
                         and principal Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 17, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00558

- CV

IN RE Roge lio LOPEZ , Jr. , Relator

Original Proceeding

ORDER

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On December 16, 2021, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering

the petition

, the appendix, and the responses from respondent Monica Alcantara and real party in

interest Michele Carey Garcia , this court concludes relator has not shown himself to be entitled

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

This court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on December 17, 2021

.

PER CURIAM PER CU

.

ATTESTED TO:

______________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BILLY VAUGHAN, CIV S-04-2549 DFL DAD P

Petitioner, ORDER

v.

TERESA SCHWARTZ,

Respondent.

 /

Good cause appearing, Respondent’s April 10, 2006 request for a thirty-day (30)

enlargement of time is granted. Therefore, the response to Petitioner’s second amended petition

for writ of habeas corpus shall be filed no later than May 15, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 19, 2006.

/vaug2549.extresp

Case 2:04-cv-02549-JAM-DAD Document 19 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

April 24, 1946

No. 51042.

#### Protests 38885-K, etc., of A. Fantis et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchaifcdise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.
### Adams, Kevin 

## (OSn
From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject:

Kevin: Marko Lucich <mlucich@buttechamber.org> Wednesday, November 27, 2013 S:12PM Adams, Kevin (OST) PShea@butteairport.com Requestfor comments

On behalf of the 400 members of the Butte-Silver Bow Chamber of Commerce, Iwould like to offer my comments regarding the proposal for Essential Air Service (EAS)at Butte, submitted bySkyWest. Butte isvery fortunate to have an airline such asSkyWest servicing our community. Ihave personally had the opportunity to fly out of Butte on SkyWest Airlines on numerous occasions. My experiences have been exceptionally good and very professional. The fourteen flights per week into our community are essential and necessary for the residents of Butte and surrounding areas. This past year hasseen an increase in passenger load and ifthis trend continues in an upward direction, it ismy hope that SkyWest can provide even more flights or larger planes. The presence of the SkyWest inthe Butte community isparamount to the economic development and growth of Butte. Aswe recruit new businesses and professionals, one ofthe priorities and selling points of our community isthat we have air service that comes right into Butte and that they are five to ten minutes from anydestination inthe community. Service and convenience are keyfactors in selecting anairline and SkyWest provides both ofthese to Butte. Butte isvery fortunate to have the air service that isbeing provided to usand Iurge you, on behalf ofthe Butte business community, that you grant the request from SkyWest airlines to provide air service to Butte. Iwould liketo thank you for your serious consideration in this matter and ifyou have anyquestions, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, Marko Lucich Executive Director Butte Chamber of Commerce 406-723-3177

1
EX-10.7(c)



 Exhibit 10.7(c) 
 June 1, 2014 
 Blackwater Capital Management, LLC 

470 Headquarters Plaza 

East Tower - 4th Floor 

Morristown, N.J. 07960 
 Attention:
Mr. Andy Silwanowicz 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Silwanowicz: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made
below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2015 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Blackwater Master Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 MSSB Spectrum Technical L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mrs. Alice Lonero at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1304. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Alice Lonero
		 	Alice Lonero
		 	Chief Financial Officer
	
	BLACKWATER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
		
	By:            	 	/s/ Andrew Silwanowicz


			
		
	 Print Name:
	 	Andrew Silwanowicz, Principal
		
	 AL/sr
Case No. 7,937.

#### KROUSE et al. v. DEBLOIS.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 138.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1803.

Indebitatus Assumpsit — Special Agreement.

The plaintiff cannot recover upon a general in-debitatus assumpsit, if a special agreement be proved.

General indebitatus assumpsit and quantum valebat for 418 pounds of beef sold and delivered. The defendant offered to prove a special agreement between the plaintiffs [Ivrouse & Gloyd] and defendant, on which the beef was delivered.

Mr. Mason, for plaintiffs,

moved the court to instruct the jury, that he was entitled to recover for the beef delivered, although a special agreement should be proved.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

But

THE COURT

(MARSHALL, Circuit Judge, absent)

refused to give the instruction. The authorities cited were: Esp. N. P. 130, 138, 140; Rolleston v. Hibbert, 3 Term R. 412; Cates v. Knight, Id. 444; Cutter v. Powell, 6 Term R. 320; Payne v. Bacomb, Doug. 651; Robinson v. Bland, 2 Burrows, 1088; Precedents of Declarations (Boston, June, 1802) pp. 18, 10.

Mr. Mason prayed leave to amend, which was granted, on payment of costs and a continuance.

[The ease, was subsequently tried, and a verdict had for the defendant. Case No. 7,938.]
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0071 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NE-05-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Replacement done 

at next scheduled 

overhaul

0.0 $ 0.00 $39,899 $39,899.00 135 $5,386,365.0

0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $5,386,365

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 17, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00621

- CV

IN THE INT OF CJT, A CHILD

,

From the 49th J udicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas Trial Court No. 7,848 Honorable H. Paul Canales, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The two appellees in this appeal, Francisco Tovar Guajardo and Irma Perez Chapa, are represented by separate appellate counsel. Both appellees’ brief s w ere originally due to be filed in this appeal on May 18, 2015. Both appellees previously were granted an extension of time to

file their brief s , extending the deadline to June 17, 2015. Both appellees have filed a second motion requesting an additional extension of time to file their brief s until July 17 , 201 5 , for a total extension of sixty days. The motion s are GRANTED. THIS IS THE FINAL

EXTENSION OF TIME THAT APPELLEE S WILL BE GRANTED

. A ppell ee s’ b rief s must be filed by July 17, 2015, or th is appeal will be set “at issue” and submitted without brief s filed by ap pellee s

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 64198.

protests 59/12449, etc. (Laredo).

#### Pan American Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*473Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00289-CR

ZETH DRAVEN BELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 485th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1588095D)

June 8, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
EXHIBIT 32.01











CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Spectrum Currency L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter Davis, President of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



















By:             /s/       Walter Davis





Name:                    Walter Davis


Title:                      President of Ceres Managed Futures LLC,


general partner of the registrant





Date:                      March 28, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Doron Uziel, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Director of Elderwatch, Inc.
(the "Company"), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 21, 2006


/s/ Doron Uziel
---------------
Doron Uziel
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting
Officer, and Director
(Principal Executive, Financial, and
Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4960 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4960

To prohibit State excise taxes on firearms and ammunition manufacturers 
                              and dealers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2024

 Mr. Risch (for himself, Mr. Cramer, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. 
 Crapo, Mr. Daines, Mrs. Fischer, and Mrs. Hyde-Smith) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit State excise taxes on firearms and ammunition manufacturers 
                              and dealers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom from Unfair Gun Taxes Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON STATE EXCISE TAXES.

    (a) In General.--A State, and any political subdivision thereof, 
may not levy or collect an excise tax on the sale of a firearm, 
ammunition, or a part or component of a firearm or ammunition by a 
manufacturer or dealer that occurs in or affecting interstate or 
foreign commerce.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall be 
construed to alter, modify, or otherwise affect the Pittman-Robertson 
Wildlife Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF FORREST A. GARB &ASSOCIATES, INC.,**

**INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

 

As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to our estimatesof reserves included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CanoPetroleum, Inc. and to all references to our firm included in thisQuarterly Report.

 

 
|   | /s/ Mark A. Murray                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | FORREST A. GARB & ASSOCIATES, INC. |

 

 

Dallas, Texas

 

February 9, 2006

 

----
Before the Second Division,

May 28, 1948

No. 52361.

protests 36864-K, etc. (Honolulu).

#### S. M. Iida et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that, certain items of the merchandise consist of imitation gut similar in all material respects to that the classification of which was involved in *Bush*v. *United States*(34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: June 24, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR - 2013 -0602 FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD SUBJECT: June 4, 2014 Roll - out Conference Call with Region 6 State Environmental Agency

Leaderships Regarding the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on June 4, 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, which was proposed on June 2, 2 014. **ATTENDEES** State Participants * : Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (Secretary Teresa Marks)

Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (Secretary Peggy Hatch , Sam Phillips, and Brian Johnson ) New Mexico Environment Department (Secret ary Ryan Flynn) Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (Deputy Secretary Scott Thompson and Eddie Terrell) Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (Chairman Bryan Shaw) * Participated by phone. Others may have been on the phone with in the state offices . EPA Participants: Regional Administrator (Ron Curry), Deputy Regional Administrator (Sam

Coleman), Regional Counsel (Suzanne Murray), Multi - Media Division Director (Wren Stenger), External Affairs Division Director (David Gray), Air Progra ms Branch Chief (Mark Hansen), Energy Policy Advisor (Rob Lawrence) , Advisor to the RA (Tom Ruiz), and Air Planning Section Chief (Guy Donaldson)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0                     176
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                     176
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                     458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,093                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           682                     682
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,775)                   (224)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                     458
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,551                     423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,551)                   (423)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,551)                   (423)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,551)                   (423)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.002)                  (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.002)                  (.001)





</TABLE>