alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10460)

#### D. E. Sanford and Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 13330.

(Decided February 27, 1963)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, as follows:

> 1. That this stipulation is limited to merchandise appraised in Belgian francs.

> 2. That as so limited, the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Descoware Corp.*v. *United States,*R.D. 10158, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 3. On or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, were the appraised *per se*unit values in Belgian francs, less 40%, plus 10% sales tax, plus packing as invoiced, said prices including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States; and that on or about the said dates of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered in the principal markets of the country of exportation for sale to the United States.

> 4. That the involved merchandise was entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption before the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 5. That the above-entitled appeal may be submitted upon this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and issues described above and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts and consistent with the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise appraised in Belgian francs is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19U.S.C. (1952 edition) § 1402), and that such statutory value therefor is the appraised *per se*unit values in Belgian francs, less 40 per centum, plus 10 per centum sales tax, plus packing, as invoiced.

*420As to all other merchandise, not appraised in Belgian francs, enumerated on the invoices covered by the entry involved herein, the appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Before the Third Division,

February 25, 1944

No. 49220.

#### Protest 100636-K of V. Sabella & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of origan the same in all material respects as that in *United States*v. *Strohmeyer*(T. D. 49242). The claim for free entry was therefore sustained as to this item.
EXHIBIT 13.2




Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 USC §1350,


as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 of Metalink Ltd. (the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Oren Brooks, co-Chief Financial Officer, certify that:




1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: July 15, 2011
 
 By: /s/Oren Brooks



Name:Oren Brooks

Title: Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-20597

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Genaro Martinez-Ruelas, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-339-1

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Genaro 

Martinez-Ruelas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Ruelas has not filed a 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 25, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-20597 Document: 00516332362 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/25/2022
No. 21-20597

2

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-20597 Document: 00516332362 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/25/2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-61,034, TA-W-61,034A, TA-W-61,034B] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on February 27, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at American Identity, Inc., Orange City, Iowa (TA-W-61,034); Hawarden, Iowa (TA-W-61,034A) and Marcus, Iowa (TA-W-61,034B). 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

      ( print page 12832)    
Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of March 2007. 

 Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E7-4999 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
----

**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to**

**Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**

**as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Guoshen Tu, certify that:

 

 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc.;

 

 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

 4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: November1, 2007
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), I, Michael E. Hart, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Allos
Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

Dated:
March 30, 2004

| | /s/MICHAEL E. HARTMichael E. Hart
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer)
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to Allos Therapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by Allos Therapeutics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification "accompanies" the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---

QuickLinks
#### HM Holdings, Inc., Respondent, v ICI American Holdings, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[635 NYS2d 468]

—Order, Supreme *261Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered April 27, 1995, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Cahn, J., with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPEX, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Russell
Ingledew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

November 15, 2005                           /s/ Russell Ingledew
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Russell Ingledew
                                            Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Report of UpSnap, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter van Hierden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard von Gnechten, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Peter van Hierden
Peter van Hierden
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: September 21, 2009/s/ Richard A. von Gnechten
Richard A. von Gnechten
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: September 21, 2009
#### Jorge Rosales et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Defendant, and Hamilton Hall Realty Corporation, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 213]

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated March 7, 1994, which granted the motion of the defendant Hamilton Hall Realty Corporation for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it and all cross claims asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

As we recently observed, "[i]t is the well-settled general rule that a landowner will not be liable to a pedestrian injured by a defect in a public sidewalk abutting the landowner’s premises unless the landowner created the defective condition, or caused the defect to occur because of some special use, or unless a statute or ordinance placed the obligation to maintain the sidewalk upon the landowner and expressly made the landowner liable for injuries occasioned by the failure to perform that duty” *(Hausser v Giunta,*217 AD2d 604, 605; *see, Kobet v Consolidated Edison Co.,*176 AD2d 785; *Zucker v 1255 Hewlett Plaza Realty Co.,*172 AD2d 517). The defendant Hamilton Hall Realty Corporation (hereinafter Hamilton) made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to summary judgment by submitting the deposition testimony and affidavit of its President, who indicated that he had no recollection of Hamilton repairing the subject sidewalk at any time prior to the alleged accident and that his search of Hamilton’s files produced no rec*330ord of any such repairs. The plaintiffs failed to come forward with any opposing evidence indicating that Hamilton created or caused the purported defective condition in the sidewalk, notwithstanding the fact that they had some four and one-half years prior to the motion within which to conduct discovery. Furthermore, the plaintiffs’ claim that the lease between Hamilton and its tenant placed the duty to maintain the sidewalk upon Hamilton is patently without merit and is refuted by the terms of the lease itself. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly awarded in favor of Hamilton *(see, e.g., Giammarino v Angelo’s Royal Pastry Shop,*168 AD2d 423; *Sheehan v Ruben-stein,*154 AD2d 663; *cf., Landisi v Beacon Community Dev. Agency,*180 AD2d 1000; *Botfeld v City of New York,*162 AD2d 652). Sullivan, J. P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
#### Lottie A. Mahin v. D. Powell Mahin.

179 So. 651.

Division A.

Opinion Filed February 23, 1938.

*Fielding & Duncan,*for Appellant;

*547No appearance for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

In this case the appeal is from an order striking portions of the answer. Motion was granted to strike paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 and 16 of the answer.

Paragraph 2 of the answer was: “Defendant denies each and every and all and singular the allegations set out in folio 2 of the amended bill of complaint.”

Paragraphs 3, 4, 7, 8, 12 and 16 were identical with paragraph. 2 except that each referred to a like plea folio of the amended bill of complaint.

“Folio” as used in the pleading, refers to a division in a document for the purpose of measurement or .reference. See New Merriam-Webster Dictionary.

The divisions of the bill of complaint.

We hold that the denials contained in the paragraphs of the answer where referred to were sufficient denials under the provisions of Section 34 of the 1931 Florida Practice Act and that these denials specifically deny those allegations of the bill of complaint respectively contained in the respective divisions of the bill of complaint referred to.

The allegations of the bill of complaint as contained in each of the divisions referred to were material allegations and the denial of those allegations specifically by the de- ■ fendant in the answer was sufficient to present the issue of the truth of the allegations so contained in the bill of complaint and were sufficient to require proof of each of such allegations so denied.

It follows, therefore, that the order appealed from must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views herein expressed.

So ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
SCALE 1:24,000

PALMER QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-I

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Palmer Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by Janet R. Stone

2013

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1969.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Massachusetts

Geological Survey.

Map units were reproduced from Peper (1978).

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 17 of 24)

(LU

DLO

W)

(WA

R

R

E

N)

(MONSON)

(WINSOR DAM)

72°15'0"W

72°15'0"W

72°22'30"W

72°22'30"W

42°15'0"N

42°15'0"N

42°7'30"N

42°7'30"N

Stone, J.R., compiler, 2013, Surficial geologic map

of the Mount Grace-Ashburnham-Monson-Webster

24-quadrangle area in central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-I

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/I.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

AND OFFICE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (MassGIS),

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of California News Tech for the quarter                ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of                Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended September 30, 2006, fairly presents in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of California                News Tech. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|    By:                          | /s/                Marian Munz                                                                           |
|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:                                    |  Marian                Munz                                                                         |
|   Title:                             |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:                                    |  November                7, 2006                                                                    |
|                     By:    | /s/                William White                                                                         |
|                   Name:              |  William                White                                                                       |
|                     Title: |  Principal                Financial Officer                                                         |
|                    Date:        |  November                7, 2006                                                                    |