alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 815 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements relating 

to the eligibility of veterans to receive reimbursement for emergency 

treatment furnished through the Veterans Community Care program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Mrs. RODGERS of Washington (for herself, Mr. BERGMAN, and Mr. PAPPAS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain 

improvements relating to the eligibility of veterans to 

receive reimbursement for emergency treatment furnished 

through the Veterans Community Care program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Extraneous 

5 Loopholes Insuring Every Veteran Emergency Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘RELIEVE Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 815 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR REIMBURSE2 MENT FOR EMERGENCY TREATMENT FUR3 NISHED TO VETERANS. 

4 (a) ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.—Section 

5 1725(b)(2)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 

6 by inserting ‘‘, unless such emergency treatment was fur7 nished during the 60-day period following the date on 

8 which the veteran enrolled in the health care system speci9 fied in subparagraph (A), in which case no requirement 

10 for prior receipt of care shall apply’’ before the period. 

11 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub12 section (a) shall apply with respect to emergency treat13 ment furnished on or after the date that is one year after 

14 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Case No. 14,479.

#### UNITED STATES v. The AUSTIN.

[9 Ben. 350.] 1

District Court, E. D. New York.

Feb., 1878.

Practice in Admiralty — Application to Set Aside Sale — Laches.

An application to set aside the sale of a vessel regularly made under a final decree in admiralty must be promptly made. Such application denied when three months had elapsed since the sale, and no excuse for its delay was offered, and the parties could not be put back into the same position as that occupied at the time of the sale.

In admiralty.

A. W. Tenney, for the United States.

J. J. Allen, for the Vessel.

BENEDICT, District Judge.

The motion made in this cause fo set aside the sale of the vessel cannot be granted. The delay of nearly three months before making the application is too great. Applications of this character must be promptly made. Here the applicant had xull knowledge of the proceedings against the boat and of her sale, and no valid excuse ..or the delay has been offered.

Furthermore, the parties cannot be put back into the same position they were before. The boat has since the sale been largely repaired, and the interest of parties in the boat has been changed by an assignment of a mortgage which covered this as well as other boats.

Finally, the proceeds of the sale have been distributed, and with full knowledge of the proceedings on the part of the applicant.

Under such circumstances there is no ground on which to justify the setting aside a judicial sale regularly made; and, the motion must be denied.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|May 15, 2007 | /s/ John P. Manning    
|------------ | -----------------------
|             | John P. Manning        
|             | Chief Executive Officer
|             |
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0181

SAT Date: 1/4/2013

Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 2 1 Linear

2 3 1 Branched

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR/CORR-S,E,L,MM; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0180-5

FATE: Estimations for 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 5.97 (E); 

S = Dispersible/0.3 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)
log Koc = 5.04 (E)

log Fish BCF = 2.2 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.7 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Linear wk; Highly branched ≥ mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: Linear P1B2; Highly branched P2B3

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI 

tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for severe irritation and possible corrosion from 

the amines.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 3.3

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.5

green algal 96-h EC50 0.19

fish _ chronic value 0.024

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.053

algal _ chronic 

value

0.1

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Aliphatic Amines, Amides; 

SAR class = Amides; log Kow = 4.2; S = 0.00074 g/L at 20 C, dispersible; pH7; liquid 

with unknown mp (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and measured 

concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

2

SARs Aliphatic Amines, Amides

SAR Class Amides

Ecotox Category Aliphatic Amines

Ecotox Factors Comments: 
 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The X-Change  Corporation,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2004, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, , Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

(1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/S/ Michael L. Sheriff
Michael L. Sheriff
C.E.O., President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2006

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB soley
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section  1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                |  |                        
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date:           |  |                        
|August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ John P. Manning    
|                |  |                        
|                |  | John P. Manning        
|                |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                |  |                        
|                |  |                        



*  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 13.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of NDS Group plc ("the
registrant") for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rick
Medlock, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.




                                                By /s/ CRK Medlock
                                                _______________________________

                                                                     CRK Medlock
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


                                                           Date: 21 October 2004


                                      E-19
The Honorable Michael James Davis, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 96-1926

_____________

Vera Lois Erickson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* District of Minnesota.

University of Minnesota; Regents of *

the University of Minnesota, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

*

Appellees. *

_____________

Submitted: May 22, 1997

Filed: May 27, 1997

_____________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Vera Lois Erickson appeals the District Court's judgment in favor of defendants. 1

Having reviewed the record and the parties' submission, we conclude the judgment of

the District Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Having

previously granted in part appellant's motion to include trial exhibits in the appellate
-2-

record, we deny the motion to the extent appellant seeks to include any additional

exhibits.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Kellam, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 570]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and attempted petit larceny. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, we conclude that it is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree *(see, People v Limpert,*186 AD2d 1005, *lv denied*81 NY2d 764).

The sentence is not excessive in light of the circumstances of the crime and defendant’s extensive criminal history. We have reviewed the remaining issue advanced by defendant and conclude that it is without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J.—Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
#### BELENCAN *v.*J. D. CANDLER ROOFING COMPANY.

Workmen’s Compensation — Total and Permanent Disability— Second-Injury Fund — Handicapped Persons — Differential Benefits.

Plaintiff is not entitled to total and permanent disability workmen’s compensation benefits from the Second-Injury Fund where he lost one leg as the result of an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with the defendant employer, received workmen’s compensation benefits therefor, and subsequently lost the other leg from causes which did not arise out of or in the course of any employment of plaintiff covered by the workmen’s compensation law.

Reference for Points in Headnote

58 Am Jur, Workmen’s Compensation § 296 *et seq.*

*733Appeal from Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board.

Submitted June 3, 1970.

(Calendar No. 11, Docket No. 52,354.)

Decided August 19, 1970.

Nick Belencan, after receipt of compensation for total disability, presented a claim for additional benefits for permanent and total disability due to loss of both legs. Additional award, payable by Second Injury Fund, affirmed by Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board. Defendant Second Injury Fund sought leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals which was denied. Defendant Second Injury Fund appeals.

Reversed.

*Beilinson & Doctorojf (Bruce L. Randall,*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Richard G. Rogers,*for defendants J. D. Candler Roofing Company and Michigan State Accident Fund.

*Frank J. Kelley,*Attorney General, *Robert A. Derengoski,*Solicitor General, and *A. G. Stoddard*and *Roger G. Will,*Assistant Attorneys General, for defendant Second Injury Fund.

T. M. Kavanagh, J.

During the course of plaintiff’s employment with defendant roofing company, he was injured when he fell from the roof of a building on August 17, 1956. As a result of that injury he was totally incapacitated from working. His employe^, chrough its insurance carrier, voluntarily paid workmen’s compensation at the proper weekly rale and for the proper duration under the Workmen’s Compensation Act in effect at that time* for *734one who was totally incapacitated from working hut not totally and permanently disabled, as such disability is defined in said act.

On July 24, 1961, it was necessary, because of the injury, to amputate plaintiff’s right leg.

On July 21, 1965, nine years subsequent to the date of the injury, plaintiff’s other leg was amputated. Amputation of the second leg did not arise out of or in the course of any employment of plaintiff covered by the workmen’s compensation law.

Plaintiff did not work after he was injured in 1956.

The above facts are not disputed.

For the reasons given and authorities cited in *Whitt*v. *Ford Motor Company*(1970), 383 Mich 726, the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board is reversed and total and permanent disability benefits denied.

No costs, a public question being involved.

T. E. Brennan, C. J., and Dethmers, Kelly, Black, and Adams, JJ., concurred with T. M. Kavanagh, J.

T. Gr. Kavanagh, J., did not sit in this case.

*

 CL 1948, § 411.1 *et seq.,*as amended (Stat Ann 1960 Rev 8 17-.141 *et seq.).*
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12851-12852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of 
March 19, 2007:

    An Open Meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 10 
a.m. in the Auditorium, Room L-002, and a Closed Meeting will be 
held Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 2 p.m.

    Commissioners, Counsels to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a) (3), (5), (6), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of 
the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Atkins, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
March 21, 2007 will be:

    The Commission will consider whether to adopt a new rule that 
will enable a foreign private issuer meeting specified conditions to 
terminate its Securities Exchange Act of 1934 registration and 
reporting obligations under Section 12(g) regarding a class of 
equity securities and its Section 15(d) reporting obligations 
regarding a class of equity or debt securities. The Commission will 
also consider whether to adopt a rule amendment that will apply the 
exemption from Exchange Act registration under Rule 12g3-2(b) to a 
class of equity securities immediately upon the effective date of 
the issuer's termination of registration and reporting obligations 
under the new exit rule.

    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
March 21, 2007 will be:


[[Page 12852]]


Formal orders of investigation;
Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature;
Litigation matters;
An adjudicatory matter; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

     Dated: March 14, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4984 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
                  --------------------------------------------

         In connection with this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Genius
Products, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002, I, Klaus
Moeller, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       This Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in this Form 10-KSB for the period
                  ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the Company.

Date:    April 3, 2003

                                              By:      /s/ Klaus Moeller
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                       Klaus Moeller
                                                       Chief Executive Officer