alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1243** 

ROBERT AFARI MINTA , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INCORPORATED , Defendant

– Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Roger W. Titus , District Judge. ( 8:09

- cv - 02286

- RWT )

Submitted : October 21, 2010 Decided: November 1 2 , 2010

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Robert Afari Minta, Appellant Pro Se. Robert G. Ames, Lesl ey Pate Marlin, VENABLE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Afari Minta appeals the district court ’ s o rder denying his motion to remand and granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on Minta’s claims for non

- payment of wages, punitive damages, breach of contract and specific performance. We have reviewed the recor d and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order
. See Minta v. FedEx Ground Package Sys.,
Inc. , No. 8:09

- cv - 02286

- RWT (D. Md
. Feb. 2, 2010 )
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adeq uately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5009 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5009

  To provide for the treatment of the Association of Southeast Asian 
     Nations as an international organization for purposes of the 
  International Organizations Immunities Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 2024

 Ms. Duckworth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the treatment of the Association of Southeast Asian 
     Nations as an international organization for purposes of the 
  International Organizations Immunities Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Appropriate Recognition 
and Treatment Needed to Enhance Relations with ASEAN Act'' or the 
``PARTNER with ASEAN Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION TO THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS.

    The provisions of the International Organizations Immunities Act 
(22 U.S.C. 288 et seq.) may be extended to the Association of Southeast 
Asian Nations in the same manner, to the same extent, and subject to 
the same conditions as such provisions may be extended to a public 
international organization in which the United States participates 
pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress 
authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such 
participation.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, William D. Eglin, Chief Executive Officer of MD
Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of MD Technologies Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MD
Technologies Inc.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 12, 2005 |  | /s/ William D. Eglin   
|                      |  | William D. Eglin       
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
No. 53051.

#### Morganite Brush Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 54357-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
SHARON KELLER

 PRESIDING JUDGE

BARBARA P. HERVEY

BERT RICHARDSON

KEVIN P. YEARY

DAVID NEWELL

MARY LOU KEEL

SCOTT WALKER

MICHELLE M. SLAUGHTER

JESSE F. MCCLURE, III

 JUDGES

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

DEANA WILLIAMSON

CLERK

(512) 463-1551

SIAN SCHILHAB

GENERAL COUNSEL

(512) 463-1597

SUPREME COURT BUILDING, 201 WEST 14TH STREET, ROOM 106, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701

WEBSITE WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/CCA

September 20, 2023

5th Court Of Appeals Clerk

Lisa Matz

600 Commerce, 2nd Floor

Dallas, TX 75202

* Delivered Via E-Mail *

Re: Continental Heritage Insurance Company, Agent Pat Kinnard, D/B/A Pat Kinnard Bail 

Bonds

CCA No. PD-0018-23 COA No. 05-20-01005-CV

Trial Court Case No. F18-18863-J

The court has issued an opinion on the above referenced cause number.

Sincerely,

Deana Williamson, Clerk

cc: State Prosecuting Attorney (Delivered Via E-Mail)

District Clerk Dallas County (Delivered Via E-Mail)

Presiding Judge Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County (Delivered Via E-Mail)

Niles Illich (Delivered Via E-Mail)

District Attorney Dallas County (Delivered Via E-Mail)

David Villafuerte (Delivered Via E-Mail)

FILE COPY
32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/Kimberly A. Springsteen-AbbottKimberly A. Springsteen-AbbottChief Executive OfficerMay 17, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp.
(the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/S/ PATRICK F. CONROY                       
|Name: Patrick F. Conroy Date:
August 5, 2011



1
1 The Honorable Mark Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1164

___________ United States of America, *
* Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Willie Jones, also known as Douchy, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 29, 2004 Filed: August 11, 2004 Vacated: August 27, 2004 Reinstated: August 3, 2005

___________ Before MELLOY, LAY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Willie Jones pleaded guilty to two drug offenses, one of which carried a mandatory term of life imprisonment because of Jones’s two prior felony drug convictions. After granting the government’s motion for a downward departure based on Jones’s substantial assistance, the district court 1 sentenced Jones to 280 months imprisonment and 10 years supervised release, and ordered $460 restitution. On-2- appeal, Jones’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the adequacy of the factual basis for the plea, and the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines, including the extent of the downward departure. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we affirm for the following reasons.
Jones acknowledged he committed the acts comprising the elements of the offenses to which he entered guilty pleas. See United States v. Marks , 38 F.3d 1009, 1012 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 514 U.S. 1067 (1995). We cannot review the extent of the downward departure granted by the district court. SeeUnited States v. Williams , 324 F.3d 1049, 1049-50 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam). We find no misapplication of the Sentencing Guidelines, or any other nonfrivolous issues, see Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
We also grant defense counsel's motion to withdraw. Counsel is reminded of the obligations under Part V of this Court's Amended Criminal Justice Act Plan. Specifically, counsel is to advise the defendant of the right to file a petition for writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, and to inform the defendant as to the merits and likelihood of success in the filing of such a petition. If counsel determines there are meritorious issues, defense counsel shall assist the defendant in filing a petition for writ of certiorari. If counsel determines there are no meritorious issues warranting the filing of a petition for writ of certiorari, counsel shall advise the defendant of the procedures for filing a petition pro se, and the time limits for the filing of such a petition. Counsel shall file a certification with the clerk within 30 days certifying that he has complied with his obligations under Part V.

______________________________
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|August 14, 2007 | /s/ John P. Manning    
|--------------- | -----------------------
|                | John P. Manning        
|                | Chief Executive Officer
|                |
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 13-10146 Summary Calendar

JOSE ALFREDO GUADIAN-SALAZAR, Plaintiff-Appellant

v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE’S INSURANCE C O M PANY; LINDA BROWN, Claim Examiner-H083; WILLIAM W. WOOD, Policy Holder/Insured, Defendants-Appellees

Appeals from the United States District Court f or the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:12-CV-43

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Alfredo Guadian-Sa l a zar (Guadian), federal p r isoner # 78944-179,

moves this court for leave to proceed in forma p auperis (IFP) i n his appeal of the district court’s dismissal of h is 42 U.S.C. § 1983 c i vil rights lawsuit a s frivolous. By moving for IFP s ta t u s here, Guadian is c hallenging the district court’s certification that his a ppeal is not t aken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 2 02 (5th Cir. 1997); F E D
. R

. A P P
. P

. 24(a). Guadian’s brief on appeal U n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D J uly26, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 13-10146 Document: 00512322961 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/26/2013No. 13-10146

makes only a conclusional assertion of good faith. He d oes not address the district court’s reasons f or its certification decision. See Baugh , 1 17 F.3d at 202. Accordingly, his challenge to the district court’s certification decision is deemed abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 ( 5th Cir. 1987). G uadian has not shown that his appeal i nv o l v es “legal points arguable o n their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th C i r . 1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). T h e r efore, G uadian’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and h i s a p p e a l is DISMISSED as frivolous. See B augh , 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5 T H C I R
. R . 42.2. The dismissal of Guadian’s complaint as f rivolous in the district court and the dismis s a l of h is appeal each counts as a strike pursuant to 2 8 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. H ammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Guadian is CAUTIONED that if he accumulates three § 1 915(g) strikes, he will not b e able to proceed IFP in a n y c i v i l a c tion or appeal filed w hile he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

2 Case: 13-10146 Document: 00512322961 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/26/2013
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MARLON INMON, DOC #992677, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. )

) Case No. 2D17-4855

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 26, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Ronald Ficarrotta, 

Judge.

Brett S. Chase of Chase Law Florida, 

P.A., Saint Petersburg, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Worldspan, L.P. (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Rakesh Gangwal,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kevin W.Mooney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

 

(1).                                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2).                                                       The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | May  25, 2005 |   | By:    |   | /s/  Rakesh Gangwal                              |   |
|--------|---------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |          |   |   |   | Rakesh  Gangwal                                  |
|   |          |   |   |   | Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |          |   |   |   |                                             |
| Date:  | May  25, 2005 |   | By:    |   | /s/  Kevin W. Mooney                             |   |
|   |          |   |   |   | Kevin  W. Mooney                                 |
|   |          |   |   |   | Chief  Financial Officer                         |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0383 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TYLER THOMAS BUTTOLPH ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 5, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 29 2022

06/29/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0383
EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                         ------------------------------


Parent
------

First Mutual Bancshares, Inc.






                                Percentage                  Jurisdiction or
Subsidiaries                   of Ownership             State of Incorporation
------------                   ------------             ----------------------

First Mutual Bank                  100%                        Washington

First Mutual Services (1)          100%                        Washington





(1)  This corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of First Mutual Bank. First
     Mutual Services (FMS) engages in the sale of mutual funds and annuities.
     PRIMEVEST Financial Services functions as the broker dealer and is
     responsible for the sale and delivery of securities. As of December 1999,
     the company decided to discontinue directly offering investment products to
     its customers.
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, I, Martin S. Lapera, President and Chief Executive Officer of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)   such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/   Martin S. Lapera                  |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Martin   S. Lapera                      |   |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

----
No. 63160.

#### Universal Transcontinental Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 58/20161 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.