alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
                                  ------------

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, David M/ Otto, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual  report on Form 10-KSB,  as amended,  of TechAlt,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions  about the  effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have  disclosed,  based on the most recent  evaluation of internal  control
over financial reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

January 13, 2006


/s/ David M. Otto
--------------------
David M. Otto
Chairman & President
Searched for **http://www.nccam.nih.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.nccam.nih.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
(Reap. Dec. 9550)

#### Railway Express Agency, a/c Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 38078; 38079.

(Decided December 7, 1959)

*Stein é Shostalc (Marjorie M. Shostalc*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Sheila N. Ziff,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise in this case consists of ice detectors for aircraft imported from Canada in May 1958, entered at United States $248.90 each, and appraised at Canadian $400 each.

When this case was called for trial, counsel for the respective parties stipulated as follows:

> Miss Shostak: * * ***

> *******

> Plaintiff offers to stipulate that the price at which the ice detectors the subject of this suit were offered for sale to all purchasers who cared to purchase for exportation to the United States, in the principal markets in the country of exportation, which was Canada, on the date of exportation involved herein, was the invoice price of $248.90 each; that through inadvertence the two entries involved in this case were appraised prior to the receipt of information regarding market conditions, which had been requested by the Appraiser, and that if the invoices were now before the Appraiser for his return, he would appraise them on the same basis as numerous other entries made at or about the same time, at the invoice unit value of United States, $248.90 each, based on information regarding market conditions subsequently received by the Appraiser.

> That the merchandise covered by this ease is not on the final list of articles published by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, on which valuation under the Tariff Act is made on the basis of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as originally enacted; that the merchandise covered by these entries not being on the list, is subject to appraisement under Section 402, as modified by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, which became effective February 28, 1958, prior to the date of these entries; and that the export value referred to above is the export value under Section 402(b), as modified by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> Mbs. Ziff : Upon the advice of the Appraiser concerned, we so stipulate.

*562On tlie record presented, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as added by section 2 of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein, and that such value is United States $248.90 each.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
113.5° W 113° W

- a 4
36°N }.. .
W
<4 } NE35113H3
n
Ole A
oot r) gy Hualapai
ba 14 Reservation
Grand Canyon ~&
National Flaric & ‘SW35113H3 WISE35113H3
al NE35T1363
Sw35113G4] SE3511364
ae
By
0 10 KILOMETERS ye
f Ia WP
or
ly

35.5° N
#### FRANK J. REPPUCCI, Jr., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Mr. Franlc A. Paglianite*and *Mr. Lee A. Holley*for the petitioner.

*Mr. William F. Kelly, Jr.,*and *Mr. Daniel F. Gilmore*for the respondent.

June 11, 1962.
No. 65549.

#### Antoine Chiris Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 181980-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in *United States*v. *Dodge & Olcott, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# PERIAL UNTY FICE OF 

# DUCATION 1398 SPERBER ROAD • EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIA 92243 • (760) 312-6464 • FAX (760) 312-6565 ANNE j. MALLORY SUPERINTENDENT May 

### 13,2014 Secretary Anthony Foxx U.S. Department ofTransportation 

### 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washingtol;l, DC 

### 20590 

### RE: Docket DOT-OST-2008-0299 Dear Secretary Foxx, Anne J Mallory, Superintendent

t"'
...

. :·:.1
··" "'""'••··

i.,.,
__;;

....- .... :··

I write to express my concerns with the Department ofTransportation's Tentative Order to terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) program in El Centro, California located in Imperial County. I urge youto consider the negative economic impacts that may occur as a result ofthe wroposed termination pfthe program. The Imperial County Airport has a tremendous track record ofsurpassing the EAS program requirements put forth by the government, as they have dramatically exceeded the enplanement minimum infour ofthe last five fiscal years. Unfortunately, in FY 2013, the Imperial County Airportbarely fell below the ten enplanementthreshold, by reaching 

### 9.5 enplanements for the first time. As youknow, the Essential Air Service was put into place to guarantee that small communities, including those withinthe Imperial County, continue to be served by certificated air carriers. Overthe last several years, Imperial County has experienced the highest unemployment rate in the nation. Ourfederal government should encourage economic growth, and consider all factors before terminating a much-needed program inthe region. As you prepare the Final Order, I urge you to consider the Imperial Valley's track record over the last three fiscal years, and askthat you consider the void that will be left should the Department ofTransportationultimately decide to terminate the much-needed Essential Air Service program currently in effect at the Imperial County Airport. Thank you for your time and consideration ofmy request.

# (};~ 

# IUI/46
. Anrte I.

# Mall~, Imperllll County Supenntendent ofSchools

Sharon Anderholt Alicia Armenta CountyBoardofEducation Sabrina C. Barber Annette Buttner Susan E. Manger
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

76) ll-E-36 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:05 AM Sheet 76 of 264 
JW-2S-1996 09=01 DEP KKK.SBU* REGION 1 717 657 «4 6 P. TM 

wi a »»II/ w m 

, AIR DOCKET 

CONTACT REPORT 

From: Madeleine Strum, US EPA, OAQPS/ESD, Coatings and Consumer Products Group 

Date of Contact: January 22,1996 

Contacts Mr. Rlchajxi Roller 

Company/Agemy: Depaitment of Eaviroomeotal Resources, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 

Telephone Numben 717 557 4587 (FAX: 4446) 

CONTACT SUMMARY: 

Mr. RoUer was contacted regarding tbe 1993/4 emissions test data for Creative Pultnuions, 

Inc. (Alum Bank, PA). He noted that the test carried out by the Department and by a private 

consultant gave the same results. The results obtained by tbe consultant were 1.81, 1.72 and 

2.20 percent available styrene. The average of these is 1.9 percent available styrene. 

Mr. Roller recollected Uiat previous tests several years back indicated higher emission factors, 

around, 4-5%. However, in the previous tests, it -was not ensued that all emissions were 

captured (a total enclosure was not utilized) so the actual emission factor may have been 

greater. The most recent test did ensure thai all of the emissions were captured. Mr. Roller 

indicated tbat the plant made several changes to pultrusion lines since these older tests which 

would reduce emissions such as codurisg the size of the resin baths and wet areas and the use 

of resin injection where feasible. 

ACCURATE 

lfflOU2 

A-94-52 

IK"
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fidelity D&D Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as added byss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934; and
2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
              financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

|Date: March 28, 2003 | By:  _________________________
|-------------------- | ------------------------------
|                     | Salvatore R. DeFrancesco      
|                     | Chief Financial Officer
#### Roxanne Brazie et al., Respondents, v Robert X. Williams, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 274]

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and verdict reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in setting aside the jury verdict of no cause of action in this medical malpractice action based upon alleged errors in the court’s "recap” charge and the recharge on proximate cause. We conclude that those instructions were not erroneous. Medical malpractice can arise from lack of knowledge, lack of ability, failure to exercise reasonable care or failure to use one’s best judgment (1 PJI 2:150; *see also, Monahan v Weichert,*82 AD2d 102, 105-106). Clearly, the knowledge, ability and judgment of the doctor are inextricably interwoven in an assessment of whether he deviated from accepted standards of medical care *(Littlejohn v State of New York,*87 AD2d 951, 952). The "requisite knowledge” language was proper. Moreover, even if the court erred in including the "requisite knowledge” language, the language was charged in the disjunctive, i.e., that "defendant failed to exercise the required degree of care * * * or that he lacked the requisite knowledge”. Thus, Roxanne Brazie (plaintiff) could *994not have been prejudiced because she could recover if she proved either that defendant failed to use reasonable care or that he lacked the requisite knowledge. Therefore, the charge imposed no greater burden on plaintiff.

Although it was error to charge that defendant’s negligence must be "the” proximate cause rather than "a” proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury *(see, Galioto v Lakeside Hosp.,*123 AD2d 421, 422), the issue is academic because the jury determined that defendant was not negligent, and, therefore, never reached the issue of proximate cause *(see, Pellescki v City of Rochester,*198 AD2d 762, 763, *Iv denied*83 NY2d 752; *Treyball v Clark,*106 AD2d 444, 445, *affd*65 NY2d 589). Furthermore, the subsequent charge corrected any error in the recap instructions.

We note that defendant’s CPLR 4404 (a) motion to set aside the verdict never addressed the weight of the evidence, nor did the court’s decision and order consider or rule upon that issue. In any event, we conclude that the jury verdict is not contrary to the weight of the evidence *(see, Kuncio v Millard Fillmore Hosp.,*117 AD2d 975, 976-977, *lv denied*68 NY2d 608). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J.—Set Aside Verdict.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
No. 42940.

#### Protest 1821-K of Neuman & Schwiers Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.
No. 50089.

#### Protest 84784-K/12558 of Norman G. Jensen (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 49793, which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the protest was sustained as claimed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40381 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARTIN GARCIA-GALLEGOS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-613-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Martin Garcia-Gallegos pleaded guilty to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He appeals his 57-month sentence, arguing that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. Garcia-Gallegos’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Garcia-Gallegos contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority ofNo. 05-40381 -2- the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). GarciaGallegos properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
No. 50078.

#### Protests 36453-K, etc., of Wimelbacher & Rice (New York).

Opinion by

Oliveb, P. J.

It was stipulated that the gloves in question are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *Aris Gloves, Inc.*(31 C. C. P. A. 169, C. A. D. 268), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the merchandise in question was held dutiable at $5.50 per dozen pairs under paragraph 1532 (a) as claimed.
Before the Third Division,

May 21, 1947

No. 51741.

#### Protest 113507-K of C. J. Tower & Sons (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce L. Rubin, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Bruce L. RubinName: Bruce L. Rubin Date: August 6, 2015
**Exhibit 21**

 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 
| **Legal Name of Entity**      | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Organization** | ** ** | **Ownership Interest** |
|----------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|
| Frederick  County Bancorp, Inc. (registrant) |       | Maryland                                   |       |                        |
| Frederick County Bank                        |       | Maryland                                   |       | 100%                        |
| FCBI Statutory Trust I                       |       | Connecticut                                |       | 100% of voting securities   |
| FCB Holdings, Inc.                           |       | Maryland                                   |       | 100%                        |
| FCB Hagerstown, LLC                          |       | Maryland                                   |       | 100%                        |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF CATHAYONLINE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JUNE 30,
2000 AND THE RELATED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR
THE YEAR THEN  ENDED AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         786
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1216
<PP&E>                                         1914
<DEPRECIATION>                                 321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1156
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       29
<OTHER-SE>                                     8939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10124
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1664)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1664)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1664)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.08)




</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences (1110).                     

*Date and Time:*                         April 19, 2007; 8 a.m.-5 p.m.                     

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, Room 1235.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Joann Roskoski, Executive Officer, Biological Sciences, Room 605, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230,                         *Tel No.:*                         (703) 292-8400.                     

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         The Advisory Committee for BIO provides advice, recommendations, and oversight concerning major program emphases, directions, and goals for the research-related activities of the divisions that make up BIO.                     

*Agenda:*
    - Budget Update and Implications.
    - Systems Biology and Leading Edge Discussions.
    - Undergraduate Education in the Biological Sciences.
    - Open Discussion.

Dated: March 13, 2007. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-4878 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P