alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Frederick Hall.

[The preceding case *In the matter of John Morion*affirmed.]

Where a witness is committed, until he shall submit to answer, he is entitled, to discharge when the proceeding is discontinued. (Per Manning J.)

*Heard May 14th.*

*Decided May 15th.*

Habeas Corpus. The petition showed that, on a complaint being made before a justice of the peace under section 9 of the Prohibitory Liquor Law, petitioner was subpoenaed as a witness to lay the foundation for 2R-’ocess against the person complained of; that a question was put to him which he refused to answer; whereupon the justice issued his warrant, committing him to the common jail until he should submit to answer the question, and he discharged by due course of law. The j^tition further showed that on issuing this commitment all further proceedings on the complaint- were discontinued. The complaint *211was the same set forth in the preceding case of *John Morton.*

The sheriff having returned, the commitment as his authority for detaining the petitioner in custody,

*G. V. N. Lothrop*and *C. I.*Walker, for the petitioner,

presented affidavits to substantiate the statement in the petition of the discontinuance of proceedings on the complaint. They also further introduced the same proceedings and relied upon the. same objection as in the preceding case of *John Morton.*

*D. E. Harbaugh*and *A.*Williams, contra,

objected to the reading of these affidavits and proceedings, and insisted further that no adjournment of the inquiry was necessary; and that it continued open.

The Court

allowed them to be read, and ordered the petitioner discharged; holding that the Justice obtained no jurisdiction, because the complaint did not set forth facts and circumstances, and therefore there was nothing to authorize the examination of witnesses.

Manning J.

was of opinion that the commitment was correct, and that the witnesses subpoenaed to testify in such cases could not raise the question of the sufficiency of the complaint. But he concurred in discharging Hall on the ground that the proceedings before the Justice had become discontinued, and that the commitment would not authorize an imprisonment when the prisoner could not have an opportunity to purge his contempt by answering.

*Prisoner discharged.*
SCALE 1:24,000

QUABBIN RESERVOIR QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-I

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Quabbin Reservoir Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by Janet R. Stone

2013

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1967.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Massachusetts

Geological Survey.

Geology mapped by J.R. Stone in 1975 (unpublished). Some

postglacial units were mapped using 2005 orthophoto images.

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 9 of 24)

(S

H

U

TE

S

B

U

R

Y)

(P

E

TER

S

HA

M)

(WINSOR DAM)

(ORANGE)

72°15'0"W

72°15'0"W

72°22'30"W

72°22'30"W

42°30'0"N

42°30'0"N

42°22'30"N

42°22'30"N

Stone, J.R., compiler, 2013, Surficial geologic map

of the Mount Grace-Ashburnham-Monson-Webster

24-quadrangle area in central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-I

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/I.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

AND OFFICE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (MassGIS),

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
Before the First Division,

January 8, 1942

No. 46786.

#### Protest 2183-K of Kushner & Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

When this case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiffs and the Government submitted the case on the official papers. A careful examination of these papers revealed nothing to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8295 

To require the President to deliver ammunition to Israel, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Ms. VAN DUYNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the President to deliver ammunition to Israel, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Immediate Support 

5 for Israel Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMMEDIATE DELIVERY OF AVAILABLE AMMUNITION 

7 TO ISRAEL. 

8 Title I of the Israel Security Supplemental Appro9 priations Act, 2024 (division A of Public Law 118–50) 

10 is amended in the matter under the heading ‘‘Procurement 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8295 IH

1 of Ammunition, Army’’ by striking ‘‘Provided’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘Provided, That any ammunition procured under this 

3 heading shall be delivered to Israel not later than 30 days 

4 after the date such ammunition is so procured: Provided 

5 further,’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Dear Mr

. Kuna :

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing fro m your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015

− 4853 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to
proce ed without this manual and remove closed

- set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to y our docket at www.regulations.gov

. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information ), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov vi a e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 1/4/16 . I f we do not receive the information

, we will close the dock et without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

– 4549

. Sincerely, /S/ Michael J. Cameron Program Analyst
# C_2007094EN.01002201.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/22

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2007/C 94/09)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 11.12.2006 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 688/06 |
| Member State | The Netherlands |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Wijziging van de subsidieregeling voor het inbouwen van het European Train Control System (ETCS) in een reeks vrachtlocomotieven |
| Legal basis | Tijdelijke subsidieregeling ombouw ETCS |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | To provide financial assistance towards the costs of fitting ETCS in series of freight locomotives that are going to use the new Betuwe Route |
| Form of aid | Grants |
| Budget | EUR 25 million for the period 2006-2007 |
| Intensity | 50 % of the eligible costs |
| Duration | 2006-2007 |
| Economic sectors | Transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministerie van Vervoer en Waterwegen |
| Koningskade 4 |
| 2500 EX Den Haag |
| Nederland |

Date of adoption of the decision

11.12.2006

Reference number of the aid

N 688/06

Member State

The Netherlands

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Wijziging van de subsidieregeling voor het inbouwen van het European Train Control System (ETCS) in een reeks vrachtlocomotieven

Legal basis

Tijdelijke subsidieregeling ombouw ETCS

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

To provide financial assistance towards the costs of fitting ETCS in series of freight locomotives that are going to use the new Betuwe Route

Form of aid

Grants

Budget

EUR 25 million for the period 2006-2007

Intensity

50 % of the eligible costs

Duration

2006-2007

Economic sectors

Transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministerie van Vervoer en Waterwegen

Koningskade 4

2500 EX Den Haag

Nederland

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
# C_2007195EN.01000301.xml

| 23.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/3

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92

Amendment by Italy of the public service obligations in respect of the scheduled air services Alghero-Rome, Alghero-Milan, Cagliari-Rome, Cagliari-Milan, Olbia-Rome and Olbia-Milan

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 195/03)

Pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes (1), the Italian Government has decided to amend, with effect from 28 October 2007, the public service obligations in respect of the scheduled air services Alghero-Rome, Alghero-Milan, Cagliari-Rome, Cagliari-Milan, Olbia-Rome and Olbia-Milan published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 72, 24.3.2006, p. 4 as follows:

1

Official Journal of the European Union

| 1. | Regarding point 1.1:






  ‘(a) | The destination Rome shall be taken to mean the airport of Rome Fiumicino, |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Regarding point 1.1:

‘(a)

The destination Rome shall be taken to mean the airport of Rome Fiumicino,

| (b) | The destination Milan shall be taken to mean the airport of Milan Linate.’ |
| --- | --- |

(b)

The destination Milan shall be taken to mean the airport of Milan Linate.’

| 2. | Regarding point 1.2:
  ‘In accordance with Article 9 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 793/2004 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports, the competent bodies may reserve certain slots for the operation of services in accordance with these obligations.’ |
| --- | --- |

2.

Regarding point 1.2:

‘In accordance with Article 9 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 793/2004 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports, the competent bodies may reserve certain slots for the operation of services in accordance with these obligations.’

The other requirements of the public service obligations published in Official Journal C 72 remain unchanged.

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 8.

1

---
Exhibit32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Alamosa (Delaware), Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’)for the fiscal year ended December  31,  2005, as filed withthe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Gary D. Forsee, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|  |           |                                                                                                                     |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                   |  |                                                   |  |  |  |  |
|-------------------|--|---------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| /s/ GaryD. Forsee |
| Name:Title:Date:  |  | Gary D.ForseeChief Executive OfficerMarch 31,2006 |
|                   |

This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shallnot, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

----
#### Jane Van Horne, *Appellant, v.*Jacob France, *Respondent.*Jane Van Horne, *Respondent, v.*William Campbell and others, *Appellants.*

In first case, judgment and order affirmed as to Mrs. Bell’s half, and Yan Home substituted as to his half, on payment of ten dollars January term fees, and ten dollars September Term fees, and expense of serving papers, in five days. Ia second case judgment reversed and action abated as to Mrs. Bell’s half. Yan Horne substituted as to his share upon same terms as above. Opinion by Learned, P. J.
Structure Drawing
```

[107th Congress Public Law 343]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ343.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 2892]]

Public Law 107-343
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study of Virginia Key Beach Park in Biscayne Bay, Florida, for possible 
 inclusion in the National Park System. <<NOTE: Dec. 17, 2002 -  [H.R. 
                                2109]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND CRITERIA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior (in this Act referred to 
as ``the Secretary'') shall conduct a study of Virginia Key Beach Park 
in Biscayne Bay, Florida, which was used for recreation by African 
Americans at a time when public beaches were racially segregated by law. 
The study shall evaluate the national significance of the site and the 
suitability and feasibility of establishing the site as a unit of the 
National Park System.
    (b) Criteria.--In conducting the study required by subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall use the criteria for the study of areas for 
potential inclusion in the National Park System contained in section 8 
of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5; popularly known as the National 
Park System General Authorities Act).

SEC. 2. REPORT.

    Upon completion of the study, the Secretary shall transmit to the 
Congress a report on the findings of the study and the conclusions and 
recommendations of the Secretary.

    Approved December 17, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2109:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107-390 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 107-273 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Apr. 30, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### George W. Millar and William D. May, *Respondents, v.*Enoch W. Page, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Order reversed, without costs. Opinion by Brady, J., and Davis, P. J.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl E. Molano, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 409]

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Montgomery County (Aison, J.), rendered January 12, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in third degree in satisfaction of an indictment charging him with this crime as well as unlawful possession of marihuana. In accordance with the plea agreement, he was sentenced to a term of l1⁄2 to 4 years in prison and was fined $5,000. Defendant contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and that he was illegally deprived of earned jail time. Initially, inasmuch as defendant made a knowing *783and voluntary waiver of his right to appeal as part of the plea agreement, he is precluded from raising these claims now. Nevertheless, were we to consider the merits, we would find that defendant was provided meaningful representation and that his agreed upon sentence was properly calculated.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RONALD CHAVIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 139 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2020, the “Appeal of Superior Court 10/11/19 

Order,” treated as a Petition for Review, the Motion for a Stay, and the Motion for Leave 

to Amend are DENIED.
#### WILLIAM R. BRANCH, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. J. CHESTER WHITE, *ET ALS.,*TRUSTEES OF THE JOINT PENSION FUND LOCAL 164, I. B. O. W., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

See same case below: 99 *N. J. Super.*295.

*Messrs. Parsonnet, Parsonnet & Duggan*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. BracJcen & Walsh*for the respondents.

April 30, 1968.

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7383
HARRY N. CHARLES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF; FLORENCE COUNTY; CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00573-DCN) Submitted: January 15, 2008 Decided: February 6, 2008 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harry N. Charles, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, SOUTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Harry N. Charles seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Charles that failure to timely file specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Charles has waived appellate review of the magistrate judge’s conclusion regarding the timeliness of his habeas corpus petition by failing to lodge that specific objection to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving proper notice of the consequences of the failure to object. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the- 3 - materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32





Section 1350 Certifications







I, Andrew K. Walker, certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Allied Bancshares, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Allied Bancshares, Inc.







|/s/Andrew K. Walker
President and Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------





|Date: November 14, 2007
|-----------------------



I, Richard E. Bell, certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Allied Bancshares, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Allied Bancshares, Inc.





|/s/Richard E. Bell
Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  November 14, 2007
|------------------------









18
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   540,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (540,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02


</TABLE>