alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL

Assistant U. S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2760

Attorneys for Petitioners

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and R.O. ALEX ALARCON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and

ALEX ALARCON, Revenue Officer,

Internal Revenue Service,

Petitioners,

v.

JONATHAN A. HUNT,

Respondent.

2:04-mc-269-DFL-GGH

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING

TO AUGUST 25, 2005

Taxpayer: Jonathan A. Hunt

Date: August 25, 2005

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Ctrm: 24 (8th Fl., GGH)

Petitioners have applied for a continuance of the Show Cause hearing set for July 28,

2005, by Order to Show Cause filed July 6, 2005. They have shown good cause. They have

ascertained all parties' schedules. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Show Cause

hearing re contempt, originally set for July 28, 2005, is CONTINUED to August 25, 2005, at

10:00 a.m., before Judge Hollows in Courtroom 24 on the Eighth Floor of the Federal

Courthouse at 501 I Street, Sacramento, California.

It is SO ORDERED.

DATED: 7/15/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

hunt269-2.ord07

Case 2:04-mc-00269-DFL-GGH Document 14 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v GEORGE W. ROAN, Jr., Storekeeper Third Class, U. S. Navy, Appellant

17 USCMA 163, 37 CMR 427

No. 20,239

July 28, 1967

*Lieutenant J. Arthur Bruno,*USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Walter F. Brown,*USN, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam:

Appellant was arraigned before a special court-martial convened at the U. S. Naval Supply Depot, Yokosuka, Japan, charged with assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 928. He pleaded not guilty but was found guilty and sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months, forfeitures of $86.00 per month for six months, and reduction to the grade of Seaman Recruit. The convening authority approved the sentence. The supervisory authority then affirmed the sentence as approved by the convening authority. A board of review in the office of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence.

The appellant has petitioned this Court for a grant of review claiming that the Government failed to properly advise him of his constitutional right to counsel prior to obtaining certain incriminating statements from him.

The record shows that the accused was interrogated, as a suspect, by a special agent for Naval Intelligence on August 23, 1966. Before giving his statement, introduced over defense objection into evidence as a prosecution *164exhibit, the appellant was warned of his rights under Article 31, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 831. He was told that he could consult with legal counsel “at any time he desired.” He was not, however, advised that he had a right to have a lawyer present when questioned. In a court-martial tried on or after June 13, 1966, such an omission constitutes reversible error (United States v Tempia, 16 USCMA 629, 37 CMR 249; United States v McCauley, 17 USCMA 81, 37 CMR 345). This case, heard September 19, 1966, is within the coverage of the above cases. Accordingly, the appellant’s petition for review is granted. The decision of the board of review is reversed and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. A rehearing may be ordered.
EX-32.1



Amended Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



INFe- HUMAN RESOURCES, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of INFe- Human Resources, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur Viola, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of INFe- Human Resources, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The amended Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the amended Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of INFe-Human Resources, Inc.



/s/    ARTHUR VIOLA

- --------------------

Arthur Viola



Chief Executive Officer

Sole Director

and Chief Financial Officer



October 31, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES THOMAS RODGERS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2661 FCD JFM P

vs.

OFFICER HAMPTON,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has requested that this action be

dismissed. By order filed May 11, 2006, defendant was granted ten days to notify the court

whether he has any objections to dismissal of this action. The ten day period has passed and

defendant has not raised any objection to dismissal or responded in any way to the court’s order. 

Good cause appearing, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), plaintiff's request shall be honored.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed.

DATED: May 31, 2006.

12

rodg2661.59

Case 2:04-cv-02661-FCD-JFM Document 38 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

May 19, 1960

No. 64217.

protest 59/30274 (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

*478Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the boxes the subject of Abstract 59557, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ex10-12.htm


Exhibit 10.11

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

 

This Amendment No. 1 (this "Amendment") to an Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") entered as of February 10, 2014, by and between Accelerize New Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation with headquarters at 20411 SW Birch St. Ste. 250, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (the “Company”), and Santi Pierini, a natural person, residing at 1224 Morningside D, Laguna Beach, CA 92651 (the “Employee”), is entered as of this 9th day of July 2014. Each of the Company and the Employee may be referred to hereinafter as a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties".

 

WHEREAS, the Parties have entered the Employment Agreement as of February 10, 2014; and

 

WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to adjust the Employee's compensation.

 

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

 

 

	 	
1.
	
Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following: 



 

3.                Compensation. During the Term, Employee shall receive an annual base salary (the “Annual Base Salary”) of Two Hundred and Eighty-Three Thousand and Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($283,250.00), which equates to Eleven Thousand Eight Hundred and Two Dollars and Eight Cents ($11,802.08) per pay period. Employee is an exempt salary employee, and therefore will not be entitled to any overtime pay. The Annual Base Salary shall be payable in accordance with the Company’s payroll practices as in effect from time to time, subject to applicable withholding and other taxes. 

 

 

	 	
2.
	
All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed or caused to be executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

 

 

EMPLOYEE:

 

 

/s/ Santi Pierini                                           

Santi Pierini

 

 

 

 

ACCELERIZE NEW MEDIA, INC.

 

 

 

By: /s/ Brian Ross                                      

Name: Brian Ross

Title: Chief Executive Officer
No. 38909.

#### Protests 935631-G, etc., of Corrugated Container Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Hínchelos, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John D.  Aquilino,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report of Viastar  Media  Corporation  on Form  10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
June 30,2004 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information  contained  in such
Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB  fairly  presents  in all  material  respects  the
financial condition and results of operations of Viastar Media Corporation


Dated:   April 8, 2005             By: /s/ John D. Aquilino
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           John D. Aquilino
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Viastar Media Corporation and will be retained by Viastar Media
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 56 (Friday, March 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2007-2)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the second quarter 2007 rail cost 
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The second quarter 2007 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.147. 
The second quarter 2007 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.537. The second quarter 
2007 RCAF-5 is 0.511.

DATES: Effective Date: April 1, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mac Frampton, (202) 245-0317. [Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-
8339.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision, which is available on our Web site http://www.stb.dot.gov. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, e-
mail or call the Board's contractor, ASAP Document Solutions; 9332 
Annapolis Rd., Suite 103, Lanham, MD 20706; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0c1d3c1d0c4c3e0d6c5d2c9dacfce8ecec5d4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="73120012031710330516011a091c1d5d1d1607">[email protected]</span></a>; 
phone (202) 306-4004. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available 
through FIRS: 1-800-877-8339.]
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Decided: March 16, 2007.

    By the Board, Chairman Nottingham, Vice Chairman Buttrey and 
Commissioner Mulvey.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5338 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4946 

To address the plea agreements for certain individuals detained at 

Guantanamo, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Mr. COTTON (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To address the plea agreements for certain individuals 

detained at Guantanamo, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for 9/11 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. TRIAL AND POST-TRIAL MATTERS RELATING TO 

6 CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT GUAN7 TANAMO. 

8 (a) PLEA AGREEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS.—Notwith9 standing the provisions of section 949h of title 10, United 

10 States Code, any plea agreement entered into by Khalid 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4946 IS

1 Shaikh Mohammad, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak 

2 Bin ‘Attash, or Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi for ac3 tions involving the terrorist attack on September 11, 

4 2001, and its related judgment, shall not preclude the trial 

5 of such individual under chapter 47A of such title or any 

6 other provision of law for that terrorist attack. 

7 (b) SENTENCING.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, in any trial of Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, 

9 Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash, or Mustafa 

10 Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi under chapter 47A of title 10, 

11 United States Code, or any other provision of law for the 

12 terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, a sentence of 

13 death shall be available. 

14 (c) CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT; TRANSFER.— 

15 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case 

16 of any sentence imposed on Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, 

17 Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash, or Mustafa 

18 Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi, such individual— 

19 (1) shall be— 

20 (A) held at United States Naval Station, 

21 Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in solitary confine22 ment; 

23 (B) provided no contact with foreign na24 tionals; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4946 IS

1 (C) provided no psychological treatment 

2 except that specifically authorized by medical 

3 authorities at United States Naval Station, 

4 Guantanamo Bay; and 

5 (2) shall not be transferred to the continental 

6 United States or any other country. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.20


 


BioRestorative Therapies, Inc.


40 Marcus Drive, Suite One


Melville, New York 11747


 


March 9, 2015


 


Mr. Francisco Silva


10 Flyers Lane


Tustin, California 92782


 


Dear Mr. Silva:


 


Reference is made to the
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2011, between BioRestorative Therapies, Inc. (formerly
known as Stem Cell Assurance, Inc.) (the “Company”) and you (the “Employee”), as amended (the “Employment
Agreement”).


 


The parties hereby agree
that, effective as of January 1, 2015, (i) the “Per Annum Salary” in Schedule A of the Employment Agreement is amended
to read as follows: “Per Annum Salary: $250,000”; (ii) the Employee shall be entitled to receive an annual bonus of
up to 20% of his Per Annum Salary based upon the satisfaction of certain performance goals and that the performance goals for the
year ended December 31, 2015, and the bonus amount payable with respect thereto, are as set forth on Schedule A attached hereto;
and (iii) the “Cash Severance Amount” in Schedule A of the Employment Agreement is amended to read as follows: “Cash
Severance Amount: Fifty percent (50%) of Per Annum Salary.”


 


Except as amended hereby,
the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	BioRestorative Therapies, Inc. 
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	     
	 	 	Mark Weinreb, Chief Executive Officer


 


Agreed:


 


	 	 
	Francisco Silva	 


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


SCHEDULE A


 


2015 Bonus Milestones:


 


		·	$7,500 in the event that, as a direct
result of the Employee’s efforts, the Company has an article published by a peer-reviewed journal with regard to its brtxDISCTM
or ThermoStem® program (or any future Company program);



 


		·	$10,000 in the event, as a direct result
of the Employee’s efforts, the Company enters into an agreement with an industrial strategic partner that, in the opinion
of the Company, considerably advances Company programs, it being understood that the Company may reject any and all proposed agreements
with regard thereto for any reason whatsoever;



 


		·	$7,500 in the event that, as a direct
result of the Employee’s efforts, the Company enters into an agreement with respect to a collaborative relationship with
an academic or institute within the New York metropolitan area that, in the opinion of the Company, results in the advancement
of the Company’s programs, it being understood that the Company may reject any and all proposed agreements with regard thereto
for any reason whatsoever;



 


		·	$25,000 in the event the Food and Drug
Administration approves an IND application with regard to the commencement of a clinical trial for a Company program.



 


Any issue as to whether any of the foregoing
conditions have been satisfied shall be determined by the Company in its sole discretion.
**EXHIBIT
      32**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








John
      R.
      Valaas, Chief Executive Officer and Roger A. Mandery, Chief Financial Officer
      of
      First Mutual Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”),
      each certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





|1. | the
              Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2006
              (the “Form 10-K”),
              fully
              complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
              and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | the
              information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First
              Mutual Bancshares, Inc.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date:
      March 14, 2007





By /s/
      John R. Valaas__


John
      R.
      Valaas


President
      and


Chief
      Executive Officer







By /s/
      Roger A. Mandery__


Roger
      A.
      Mandery


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer
April 18, 1949

No. 53056.

Suit 4585.

#### Border Brokerage Company et al. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1067 affirmed February 1, 1949. C. A. D. 402.
����������	�����

�������������

���������

�������

������

�����	

����

������

�����

������

������

���������

������

������

������

���������	���������

�

� � � ����	

�������������������������������	�����	������������ ������	����	

���	�����!��������"#���$�����	����%������&'��	&	���

!���&	�	!��

������(�)���&

*��$+�&	

���,���	�-���������	

����������������	

'.�	�������������	

'.�	�������������%�������	

'.�	������	���������	��	���������/���	� ���0��1!�����������	���������	��	���������

!������������������%�������	

'.�	������	��	���������

������
#### In the Matter of the Application of Jeremiah Toomey for Certiorari to Review Assessment, and Twelve Other Similar Cases.

Motion for *certiorari*granted.
36°40'N

450000
36°35'N

36°30'N

4pyqonee

69°30°'E 69°35'E 69°40'E 69°45'E 69°50'E

EXPLANATION
—— Road & Peak
—--— Stream, mostly intermittant [__] Image quadrant or tile

O City, town, or village
—- Province boundary

0 10 KILOMETERS

[——

0 5 MILES
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-719 

________________________________________________________________________ 

WEAPONS 

Proliferation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ROMANIA 

Signed at New York July 19, 2004 

 

 and 

Agreement Amending the Agreement 

Signed at Washington December 3, 2008 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ROMANIA 

Weapons: Proliferation 

 Agreement signed at New York July 19, 2004; 

 Entered into force July 19, 2004. 

 And agreement amending the agreement. 

 Signed at Washington December 3, 2008; 

 Entered into force May 27, 2009.