alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10161)

#### United States *v.*Bruce Duncan Co., Inc.

Entry No. 15802.

(Decided February 6, 1962)

*WilUam S. Orriok, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(Morris Braverman,*trial attorney), for the plaintiff.

*Stein <& ShostaJc; Mdtoard*V. *Glad*associate counsel; for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise covered by this appeal for re-appraisement consists of nylon syringes, exported from the United Kingdom on or about September 30, 1957. It was appraised at the invoiced unit values, less ocean freight and insurance, plus 7 per centum. This appeal was filed by the collector.

When this case was called for trial, it was submitted upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> Mr. Braverman : Your Honor, the merchandise here consists of certain nylon syringes, or scientific glassware, exported from the United Kingdom on or about September 30,1957.

> The Government offers to stipulate with counsel for the defendant that the merchandise is freely offered in the country of origin for domestic consumption; that there is no higher export value; that foreign value as defined in Section 402(a) [sic] of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, is the proper basis of appraisement, and that such foreign value is as follows:

> *548For the 2 cc. the value is 4 shillings 6 pence each, net packed.

> For the 3 cc., 6 shillings each, net packed.

> For the 5 cc., 6 shillings 8 pence each, net packed.

> For the 10 cc., 7 shillings 11 pence each, net packed, and for the 20 cc., 9 shillings 6 pence each, net packed.

> Me. Glad. After having conversed with my client, Dr. Carver, who is the owner of Ohilds Surgical Supply Inc., we so stipulate.

On tlie agreed facts, I find that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the nylon syringes involved herein and that such values are as follows:

> 2 cc. size — 4 shillings 6 pence each, net packed

> 3 cc. size — 6 shillings each, net packed

> 5 cc. size — 6 shillings 8 pence each, net packed

> 10 cc. size — 7 shillings 11 pence each, net packed

> 20 cc. size — 9 shillings 6 pence each, net packed

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### JOSEPH De VITO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. MULLEN’S ROOFING COMPANY, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 72 *N. J. Super.*233.

*Messrs. Shaw, Pindar, McElroy, Connell & Foley*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. David & Albert L. Cohn*and *Mr. Richard Lifland*for the respondent.

April 30, 1962.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8279 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8279

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that gain or loss 
  on the sale or exchange of certain coins or bullion is exempt from 
                              recognition.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2024

Mr. Mooney (for himself, Mr. Perry, and Mr. Weber of Texas) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that gain or loss 
  on the sale or exchange of certain coins or bullion is exempt from 
                              recognition.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Monetary Metals Tax Neutrality Act 
of 2024''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM RECOGNITION OF GAIN OR LOSS FROM SALE OF CERTAIN 
              COINS OR BULLION.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter O of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after part IV the following new 
part:

               ``PART V--SALE OF CERTAIN COINS OR BULLION

``Sec. 1071. Sale of certain coins or bullion.

``SEC. 1071. SALE OF CERTAIN COINS OR BULLION.

    ``No gain or loss shall be recognized on the sale or exchange of--
            ``(1) gold, silver, platinum, or palladium coins minted and 
        issued by the Secretary at any time, or
            ``(2) refined gold or silver bullion, coins, bars, rounds, 
        or ingots which are valued primarily based on their metal 
        content and not their form.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of parts for subchapter O of 
chapter 1 of such Code is amended by inserting after the item relating 
to part IV the following new item:

             ``Part V--Sale of Certain Coins or Bullion''.

    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to sales or exchanges after December 31, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, I, Martin S. Lapera, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.



/s/ Martin S. Lapera
-------------------------------------
Martin S. Lapera
President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 53065.

#### Tice & Lynch, Inc., and E. M. Sergeant Pulp & Chemical Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 144411-K and 140526-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspectors as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspectors as “manifested, not found,” is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.
#### Harvey S. Bonney and others, *Commissioners, etc.,*Respondents, *v.*S. Howard Wrisley, *Appellant.*

Judgment of County Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Learned, P. J.
No. 56023.

protest 151064-K (Galveston).

#### W. R. Zanes & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
### Martin , Michae l (OST ) Pp l - QST- - \^ ^ l" - ^^^ M From : Hawkins , Caro l [Molina] [Carol.Hawkins@unisys.com ] Sent : Wednesday , Octobe r06 , 201 0 7:5 5 A M To : Devany , Denni s (OST) ; Martin , Michae l (OST ) Cc : nancywitham@colganair.co m [ s j .. , Subject : August a airpor t service s e n -.y^ir^i^T ' Importance : Hig h —r-^-x] ^ Goo d mornin g gentlemen , rd^ Q I a m a consultan t fro m Sout h Carolin a an d hav e bee n i n you rbeautifu l cit yeverywee k sicc e Januar

y3'^'' , 201 0 (excep t fo r3 week s vacation) , i mad e m yfirs t tri p her e o n th e da yi t snowe d 1 8 inches , an d fle wint o Portland . I foun d tha t no t onl ydi d August a hav e a wonderfu l littl e airport , i t als o ha d a n aut o renta l compan y base d a t th e airpor t tha t wa s ope n o n Sunday . I fl yU S Airway s ou t o f Charlotte , bein g tha t Charlott e i s a hu b fo rthem . I wante d t o explai n th e los s o f revenue , no t onl yfro m mysel f bu t fro m othe rbusines s traveler s a s well . I f US Airway s move s ou t o f th e August a terminal , the n a lo t o f ou rbusines s wil l b e los t t o you rcity . W e wil l begi n t o sta you rlas t nigh t i n Portland , whic h mean s los s o f roo m revenue , los s o f Foo d an d Beverag e revenue , los s o f ca rrenta l revenu e an d al l th e taxe s associate d wit h those . Fo rth e hotels , i t mean s 48-5 2 roo m night s los t pe rperson , pe ryear , foo d revenu e fo rthos e days , aut o renta l fo rth e entir e stay , i n additio n t o miscellaneou s purchases . I hav e no t spoke n wit h on e travele rwh o feel s th e cos t o f airfar e outweigh s removin g US Ai ran d bringin g i n a n airlin e tha t use s a 9 sea t plane . I wil l no t spea k fo rothers , bu t I d o no t thin k I wil l fl yi n tha t suc h a smal l airplane , s o yo u wil l definitel ylos e m ybusines s i f US Ai rleave s Augusta . M yon e voic e mayno t carrymuc h weight , bu t multipl ytha t an d i t wil l affec t you rtaxabl e incom e fo rAugusta . Than k yo u fo rlistenin g t o m yopinion . Caro l Hawkin s Caro l Hawkin s Busines s Consultan t FlexTech , Inc . chawkins@flextech.co m 228-233-533 5 cell 803-475-990 9 hom e 207-629-428 1 Commerc e Drive , Augusta , M E Caiifideitticditi/

JVatice : JAi ) canutuuucatioa , an dam / fi£ei attached , cantau ncanfidetttU dittpxtmatii mtha t inay , G e pxuiiCeqed . She . inpvunatio nw intatde d(»i(if fa % th e cu e vf

, the . indwiduai( > ) o-

x entUy . t awhic hi t

b addxe^ied . Jf . yxu

i wt z na t tli e uttende dxecipiettt , Mty , diiclo^UMe , diiVuSutiana t th e tahiit qe f

atuf . acUanin>ie£ianc

e upa ntAL

> cammunicatw ni i pwhiSUe dan dtnaif , 6 e tuitawful . 3 ^ ijM t Haiie teceUiedthi s cemmiuiiccUuu t i nevcax , pCeat e notif

y th e iende x immediateti/ . d ^ xepiy , e-mai t an ddutxotf

, th e oHiffina

i inp)>umitii>n . JAan hifoiu
#### In the Matter of City of Fulton et al., Petitioners, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

[633 NYS2d 914]

—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioners City of Fulton, Fulton Fire Department and Fulton Department of Civil Service commenced this proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 seeking to review so much of the final order of the New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) as awarded respondent Carl M. Emmons, Sr. (Emmons) compensatory damages for mental anguish in the amount of $50,000 and awarded interest on an award of $1,869 for loss of employment opportunity from July 5, 1986. The proceeding was transferred to our Court pursuant to Executive Law § 298.

We conclude that the award of damages for mental anguish is excessive. Emmons testified that, as a result of petitioners’ discriminatory conduct in disqualifying him for a position of fire fighter on the basis of physical disability, he felt "very upset and disappointed”, and "bad”, and that he was not being treated fairly; that he was "mean at home” and took it out on his wife and kids; and that he lost sleep over it and thinks about it "[a]ll the time”. However, he never sought medical treatment. Although proof of mental anguish and humiliation may be established by the testimony of the complainant alone *(see, Matter of New York State Dept, of Correctional Servs. v State Div. of Human Rights,*207 AD2d 585, 586), an award of *972$10,000 is more consistent with awards for comparable injuries and proof of mental anguish made in similar cases *(see, Matter ofLaverack & Haines v New York State Div. of Human Rights,*217 AD2d 955; *Matter of New York State Dept, of Correctional Servs. v State Div. of Human Rights, supra; Matter of Marcellus Volunteer Fire Dept, v Stock,*155 AD2d 982).

Also, the award of interest on loss of employment opportunity from July 5,1986, when damages ceased to accrue, is erroneous. Pursuant to CPLR 5002 and 5004, interest is due at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of the Commissioner’s order, November 22, 1994 *(see, Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Gissha White Plains Corp.,*107 AD2d 750; *State Div. of Human Rights v Massive Economic Neighborhood Dev.,*47 AD2d 187, 189).

Thus, we modify the determination by reducing the award for mental anguish to $10,000 and by providing that interest accrue on the award for loss of employment opportunity from November 22, 1994, and otherwise confirm the determination. (Executive Law § 298 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hurlbutt, J.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/  John T. DrexlerJohn T. DrexlerVice PresidentDate: August 16, 2010
April 19, 1956

Reap. Dec. 8571.

#### *Brokerage Co.*v. *United States.*

Entered at Blaine, Wash. [Not published.] Motion by plaintiff.
Before the Second Division,

July 8, 1940

No. 44089.

#### Protests 783715-G, etc., of American Express Co. et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Hínchelos, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 497 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 497

    To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude a basic 
 allowance for housing from income for purposes of eligibility for the 
               supplemental nutrition assistance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2023

 Ms. Duckworth (for herself, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. King, Mr. Blumenthal, 
 Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Warnock, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Welch, Ms. Baldwin, Ms. 
Klobuchar, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Booker, Mr. Fetterman, Mr. Tester, and Mrs. 
    Murray) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude a basic 
 allowance for housing from income for purposes of eligibility for the 
               supplemental nutrition assistance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Family Nutrition Access Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING FROM INCOME.

    Section 5(d) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 
2014(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (18), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (19)(B), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(20) a basic allowance for housing paid to a member of a 
        uniformed service under section 403 of title 37, United States 
        Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000050809-NOV-201109:03 AM
EX-10.5(b)



 Exhibit 10.5(b) 

June 1, 2014 
 Rabar Market Research, Inc. 

10 Bank Street, Suite 830 
 White Plains, New York 10606-1933 

Attn: Mr. Paul Rabar 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals  

 Dear Mr. Rabar 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2015 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	Rabar Master Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Westport Futures Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Tidewater Futures Fund L.P. 

 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mrs. Alice Lonero at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1304. 
  

					
	Very truly yours,		
		
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC		
			
	By:		 /s/ Alice Lonero
		
			Alice Lonero		
			Chief Financial Officer		
		
	RABAR MARKET RESEARCH, INC.		
			
	By:		 /s/ Paul Rabar
		
			
	Print Name:		 Paul Rabar
		
		
	AL/sr
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Nuclear Regulatory Commission
 Pursuant to 10 CFR 110.70(C) “Public notice of receipt of an application,” please take notice that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has received the following request for an import license. Copies of the request are available electronically through ADAMS and can be accessed through the Public Electronic Reading Room (PERR) link 
                    *http://www.nrc.gov/​reading-rm.html*
                     at the NRC Homepage. A request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene may be filed within 30 days after publication of this notice in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Any request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene shall be served by the requestor or petitioner upon the applicant, the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; and the Executive Secretary, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520. The information concerning this import license application follows. NRC Import License Application
Name of applicant, date of application, date received, application No. docket No.
Description of material
End use
Country of originMaterial type
Total quantityWestinghouse Electric Company LLC, February 28, 2007, March 1, 2007, IW021, 11005674
Contaminated materials (waste filter cake and shot) generated by Mississauga Metals & Alloys in Ontario, Canada from the decontamination of steel received from the Hematite facility in Festus, MO under NRC License XW003
Mississauga is required to return up to 74,843.0 kilograms of filter cake and 122,470.0 kilograms of shot, which it expects to generate from the decontamination process. It is expected that these materials will be contaminated with up to 3.506 kilograms uranium-235 contained in up to a total of 72.288 kilograms of uranium with a maximum enrichment of 4.9 weight percent
All materials are to be disposed of at the Energy Solutions of Utah site located in Clive, Utah in accordance with an existing agreement between the parties
Canada.
 Dated this 13th day of March 2007 at Rockville, Maryland. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Margaret M. Doane, Deputy Director, Office of International Programs.


[FR Doc. E7-5336 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### In the Matter of Ronald Jenkins, Appellant, v Daniel Senkowski, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[634 NYS2d 224]

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lewis, J.), entered January 3, 1995 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner is currently an inmate at Clinton Correctional Facility in Clinton County. While processing petitioner for transfer to this facility, correction officers found bank statements and related documentation in petitioner’s possession. Thereafter, he was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing contraband. Inasmuch as petitioner does not deny that he possessed the subject documentation, but simply claims that he did not know it was contraband, we find that Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition. Prison disciplinary rule 113.23 clearly states that any article not authorized by the facility superintendent or his or her designee constitutes contraband *(see,*7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [xiv]; *Matter of Gittens v Coughlin,*184 AD2d 812). The fact that petitioner was unaware that this rule covered the documentation in his possession does not absolve him from guilt. We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.