12608 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 51 / Friday, March 16, 2007 / Notices 

information about the substitute 

refrigerant, and other information. This 

information is needed so that 

subsequent technicians working on the 

MAC system will be able to service the 

equipment properly, decreasing the 

likelihood of significant refrigerant 

cross-contamination and potential 

failure of air conditioning systems and 

recovery/recycling equipment. 

Burden Statement: The annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

this collection of information is 

estimated to average 0.08 hours per 

response. Burden means the total time, 

effort, or financial resources expended 

by persons to generate, maintain, retain, 

or disclose or provide information to or 

for a Federal agency. This includes the 

time needed to review instructions; 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize 

technology and systems for the purposes 

of collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 

requirements which have subsequently 

changed; train personnel to be able to 

respond to a collection of information; 

search data sources; complete and 

review the collection of information; 

and transmit or otherwise disclose the 

information. 

Respondents/Affected Entities: 

Vehicle Air Conditioning Repair 

Facilities. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

87,000. 

Frequency of Response: Once per and 

upon retrofit of a motor vehicle air 

conditioner. 

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 

27,778. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost: 

$2,011,111, which includes zero capital 

startup cost, $33,333 annualized O&M 

costs and $ 1,977,778 annual labor cost. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is a 

decrease of 55,555 hours in the total 

estimated burden currently identified in 

the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR 

Burdens. This decrease is because the 

number of cars that could be retrofitted 

to use a SNAP substitute refrigerant is 

decreasing. New cars sold before 1994 

contain CFC–12 air conditioning 

systems and the number of those cars in 

operation has decreased since this last 

ICR renewal. (New cars sold after 1994 

contain a SNAP substitute refrigerant 

and do not need to be retrofitted.) With 

fewer CFC–12 cars (pre-1994 cars) on 

the road, there are fewer cars that will 

be retrofitted to a new SNAP approved 

refrigerant and subject to this ICR. 

Dated: March 10, 2007. 

Oscar Morales, 

Director, Collection Strategies Division. 

[FR Doc. E7–4856 Filed 3–15–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OECA–2006–0449; FRL–8288–5] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to OMB for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; NSPS for Standards of 

Performance for Storage Vessels for 

Petroleum Liquids for Which 

Construction, Reconstruction or 

Modification Commenced After June 

11, 1973, and Prior to May 19, 1978 

(Renewal), EPA ICR Number 1797.04, 

OMB Control Number 2060–0442 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.), this document announces 

that an Information Collection Request 

(ICR) has been forwarded to the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval. This is a request 

to renew an existing approved 

collection. The ICR which is abstracted 

below describes the nature of the 

collection and the estimated burden and 

cost. 

DATES: Additional comments may be 

submitted on or before April 16, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing docket ID number EPA–HQ–

OECA–2006–0449, to (1) EPA online 

using www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method), or by e-mail to 

docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket and Information 

Center, mail code 2201T , 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB at: 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer 

for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20503. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marı ́a Malave ́, Compliance Assessment 

and Media Programs Division (Mail 

Code 2223A), Office of Compliance, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; telephone 

number: (202) 564–7027; fax number: 

(202) 564–0050; e-mail address: 

malave.maria@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has 

submitted the following ICR to OMB for 

review and approval according to the 

procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. 

On June 21, 2006 (71 FR 35652), EPA 

sought comments on this ICR pursuant 

to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no 

comments. Any additional comments on 

this ICR should be submitted to EPA 

and OMB within 30 days of this notice. 

EPA has established a public docket 

for this ICR under docket ID number 

EPA–HQ–OECA–2006–0449, which is 

available for public viewing online at 

http://www.regulations.gov, in person 

viewing at the Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket 

Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 

3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC. The EPA Docket 

Center Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and 

the telephone number for the 

Enforcement and Compliance Docket is 

(202) 566–1927. 

Use EPA’s electronic docket and 

comment system at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, to submit or view 

public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the docket, and 

to access those documents in the docket 

that are available electronically. Once in 

the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then 

key in the docket ID number identified 

above. Please note that EPA’s policy is 

that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, 

as EPA receives them and without 

change, unless the comment contains 

copyrighted material, CBI, or other 

information whose public disclosure is 

restricted by statute. For further 

information about the electronic docket, 

go to www.regulations.gov. 

Title: NSPS for Standards of 

Performance for Storage Vessels for 

Petroleum Liquids for which 

Construction, Reconstruction or 

Modification Commenced after June 11, 

1973, and prior to May 19, 1978 

(Renewal). 

ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 

1797.04, OMB Control Number 2060– 

0442. 

ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to 

expire on March 31, 2007. Under OMB 

regulations, the Agency may continue to 

conduct or sponsor the collection of 

information while this submission is 

pending at OMB. An Agency may not 

conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 

required to respond to, a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 51 / Friday, March 16, 2007 / Notices 12609 

The OMB control numbers for EPA’s 

regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after 

appearing in the Federal Register when 

approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, 

and displayed either by publication in 

the Federal Register or by other 

appropriate means, such as on the 

related collection instrument or form, if 

applicable. The display of OMB control 

numbers in certain EPA regulations is 

consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. 

Abstract: The New Source 

Performance Standards (NSPS) for 

Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids 

for which Construction, Reconstruction 

or Modification Commenced after June 

11, 1973, and prior to May 19, 1978 

were proposed on June 11, 1973, and 

promulgated on March 8, 1974. These 

regulations apply to facilities that store 

petroleum liquids in storage vessels 

with a storage capacity greater than 

151,416 liters (40,000 gallons) 

including: storage vessels with capacity 

greater than 151,416 liters (40,000 

gallons) but not exceeding 246,052 liters 

(65,000 gallons), and where 

construction or modification 

commenced after March 8, 1974, and 

prior to May 19, 1978; and storage 

vessels that have a capacity greater than 

246,052 liters (65,000 gallons), and 

where construction or modification 

commenced after June 11, 1973, and 

prior to May 19, 1978. Facilities that are 

not subject to these standards are 

storage vessels of petroleum or 

condensate stored, processed, and/or 

treated at a drilling and production 

facility prior to custody transfer. This 

information is being collected to assure 

compliance with 40 CFR part 60, 

subpart K. 

In general, all NSPS standards require 

initial notifications, performance tests, 

and periodic reports. Affected facilities 

report only if a storage vessel is no 

longer subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart 

K and will become subject to the current 

storage vessel standard, 40 CFR part 60, 

subpart Kb. The NSPS subpart K 

standards also require the owner/ 

operator to document (recordkeeping) 

the activities of the storage period, the 

maximum true vapor pressure, and the 

type of petroleum liquid stored. This 

information is recorded only when a 

petroleum liquid is changed in the 

storage vessel. Owners or operators are 

also required to maintain records of the 

occurrence and duration of any startup, 

shutdown, or malfunction in the 

operation of an affected facility, or any 

period during which the monitoring 

system is inoperative. These 

notifications, reports, and records are 

essential in determining compliance, 

and required of all sources subject to 

NSPS. 

Any owner or operator subject to the 

provisions of this part shall maintain a 

file of these measurements, and retain 

the file for at least two years following 

the date of such measurements, 

maintenance reports, and records. All 

reports are sent to the delegated state or 

local authority. In the event that there 

is no such delegated authority, the 

reports are sent directly to the United 

States Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) regional office. 

Burden Statement: The annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

this collection of information is 

estimated to average 3.5 hours per 

response. Burden means the total time, 

effort, or financial resources expended 

by persons to generate, maintain, retain, 

or disclose or provide information to or 

for a Federal agency. This includes the 

time needed to review instructions; 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize 

technology and systems for the purposes 

of collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 

requirements which have subsequently 

changed; train personnel to be able to 

respond to a collection of information; 

search data sources; complete and 

review the collection of information; 

and transmit or otherwise disclose the 

information. 

Respondents/Affected Entities: 

Owners or operators of facilities that 

store petroleum liquids for which 

construction, reconstruction or 

modification commenced after June 11, 

1973, and prior to May 19, 1978. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

220. 

Frequency of Response: Initially, on 

Occasion. 

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 

769 hours. 

Estimated Total Annualized Cost: 

$65,142, which includes $0 annualized 

capital startup costs, $0 Operating and 

Maintenance Costs (O&M) and $65,142 

annual labor costs. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is a 

small increase of 100 in the labor hours 

and no change in the annualized cost, 

which includes capital/startup and 

operation and maintenance costs, in this 

ICR compared to the previous ICR. This 

is due to two considerations. First, the 

regulations have not changed over the 

past three years and are not anticipated 

to change over the next three years. 

Secondly, the growth rate for the 

industry is very low, negative or nonexistent, so there is no significant 

change in the overall burden. Since 

there are no changes in the regulatory 

requirements and there is no significant 

industry growth, the slight increase in 

the labor hours is only due to the 

inclusion of managerial and clerical 

hours and updating of the technical 

labor rate. In addition, there is no 

change in the annualized cost in this 

renewal when compared to the previous 

ICR. 

Dated: March 7, 2007. 

Oscar Morales, 

Director, Collection Strategies Division. 

[FR Doc. E7–4857 Filed 3–15–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–6685–1] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

202–564–7167. 

An explanation of the ratings assigned 

to draft environmental impact 

statements (EISs) was published in FR 

dated April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17845). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20060431, ERP No. D–COE–

E67005–NC, PCS Phosphate Mine 

Continuation, Proposes Continued 

Mining of the Phosphate Reserve in 

an Economically Viable Fashion, 

Beaufort County, NC 

Summary: EPA objected to issuance of 

a permit for the applicant-preferred 

alternative, which would impact 2,408 

acres of waters/wetlands of the U.S. and 

7.3 miles of streams. EPA noted that the 

applicant-preferred alternative is the 

most environmentally damaging of the 

alternatives that were evaluated and 

would represent one of the largest 

wetland acreage loss ever permitted in 

North Carolina. EPA encouraged the 

Corps to determine if there may be 

another alternative that would have less 

environmental impact and still be 

practicable, and recommended specific 

refinements to other alternatives. EPA 

requested information in the Final EIS, 

including additional information about 

the economic analyses, determination of 

appropriate stream mitigation ratios, 

clarification of phosphogypsum stack 

impacts on surficial aquifers, and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES