alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1865 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 34 ) IV-E-2 2 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20089:15:28AM

Sheet 34 of 105P. 2 

# RADIA N CORPORATIO N 

# A-83-2 7 IV-E-2 2
TELEPHON E CAL L REPOR T
DATE : Octobe r 23 , 198 6 TO : Mr . Denni s Ramse y

Departmen t o f Environmenta l Managemen t P . 0 . Box2768 7 Raleigh , Nort hCarolin a 2761 1 (919 ) 733-508 3 FROM : Philli pA . May , Radia nCorporatio n SUBJECT : Sodiu

m Scrubbe r Discharg e Consideration s 

# ^r:%^' ,,ir J*r rJ0
Mr . Ramse y

state dtha t al l discharges , whethe r the y are/from

a scrubbe r uni t itsel f o r fro

m a publicafl y

owne dtreatmen t works , musvmee t th e state s-^fise-HAac- *

_ tlF- AvAn,46<-<-, Pus ,rfr* u*r«

c?».AL,ry

\c< t HCfi

<4y ulTlueii l yulile l ine-j . A neffluen t guide!ine^^rj i concentratio nlimi t use din c ^ / ^ v — - permittin g a new

source . Th e impac t o f a new sourc e i s evaluate db y determinin g pollutan t concentration s inth e receivin g wate r body i f th e AIL01^4 gl *-. /*>STrl

* 4/r* discharg e wer e t o occur . The'concentratio nlimit s ar e calle dwate r qualit y criteria . Th e criteri a inNort hCarolin a fo r sulfat e an d TD S i s 25 0 „ A mg/lite r fo r discharg e int o a receivin g wate r body whic hw41 1 potentiall y bo - -u$« 4 a s a drinkin g wate r source . H e als o state dtha t h e woul dsenda cop y o f th e N C wate r qualit y criteria .



### i^0~t^W 

# *~^<^c±{

y^^y- jiL ^L^^r^^y^' Progres s Center/320 0 E . Chape l Hil l Rd./Nelso n Hwy./P.O . Bo x13000/Researc h Triangl e Park . N.C . 27709/(919)541-910 0
#### Giles Martin, *Appellant, v.*Milford C. Bean, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
November 27, 1959

Reap. Dec. 9548.

#### Sage Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States,

Motion by defendant.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-10146

Summary Calendar

JOSE ALFREDO GUADIAN-SALAZAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE’S INSURANCE COMPANY; LINDA BROWN,

Claim Examiner-H083; WILLIAM W. WOOD, Policy Holder/Insured,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:12-CV-43

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Alfredo Guadian-Salazar (Guadian), federal prisoner # 78944-179,

moves this court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his appeal of the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit as frivolous. 

By moving for IFP status here, Guadian is challenging the district court’s

certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117

F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a). Guadian’s brief on appeal

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 26, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 13-10146 Document: 00512322961 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/26/2013
No. 13-10146

makes only a conclusional assertion of good faith. He does not address the

district court’s reasons for its certification decision. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202. 

Accordingly, his challenge to the district court’s certification decision is deemed

abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744,

748 (5th Cir. 1987). Guadian has not shown that his appeal involves “legal

points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and citation

omitted). Therefore, Guadian’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is

DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at

202 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The dismissal of Guadian’s complaint as frivolous in the district court and

the dismissal of his appeal each counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Guadian is CAUTIONED that if he accumulates three § 1915(g) strikes, he will

not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

2

 Case: 13-10146 Document: 00512322961 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/26/2013
No. 42929.

#### Protests 2943-K, etc., of R. L. Albert & Son, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the record presented cheese sticks were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Mikel, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 277]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The testimony of the arresting officer concerning complainant’s description of defendant’s clothing did not constitute bolstering *(see, People v Spencer, 212*AD2d 645, *lv denied*86 NY2d 741; *People v Castro,*174 AD2d 378, *lv denied*78 NY2d 1074). Even assuming, arguendo, that the evidence was improperly admitted, its admission was harmless *(see, People v Johnson,*57 NY2d 969, 970).

Evidence that defendant struggled with police when he was arrested was properly admitted because its probative value exceeded any prejudice to defendant *(see, People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233, 242). Indeed, defendant himself used that evidence in arguing that the blood on his clothing was the result of that struggle, not the result of an injury he sustained while breaking into the premises. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.—Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

   Registrant: Telemonde, Inc., a Delaware corporation

   Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Telemonde, Inc.:

Telemonde Investments Limited, a British Virgin Islands Company
EquiTel Communications Limited, a United Kingdom company
telemonde.net, S.A., organized in Switzerland
   TGA (UK) Limited, a United Kingdom company
Telemonde Networks Limited, a United Kingdom company
       Telecities Limited, a United Kingdom company
       MetroLinx Limited, a United Kingdom company

   Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Telemonde Investments Limited:

Telemonde International Bandwidth Limited, a British Virgin Islands company
       Telemonde Bandwidth (Bermuda) Limited, a Bermuda company
       Telemonde International Bandwidth (Bermuda) Limited, a Bermuda company

   Subsidiaries of EquiTel Communications, Limited:

EquiTel Card Services Limited (100%), a United Kingdom company
Teleroute Limited (100%), a United Kingdom company
Telesource Limited (100%), a United Kingdom company
Desert Telecommunications Services LLC (49%), organized in Oman
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6603

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MICHAEL KENNY CARTER, a/k/a Blaze , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 3:17

- cr - 00351

- JFA

- 1 )

Submitted : January 26, 2024 Decided: February 5, 2024

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael Kenny Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6603 Doc: 21 Filed: 02/05/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Michael Kenny Carter appeals the district court’s order s denying his postjudgment
motions and his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s orders

. United States v. Carter , No. 3:17

- cr - 00351

- JFA

- 1 (D.S.C. May 2, 2023, May 24, 2023, and July 28, 2023 )

. Carter’s motion titled as a writ and his motion s for default , to expedite , for bail or release pending appeal , and to voluntarily dismiss his appeal without prejudice are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6603 Doc: 21 Filed: 02/05/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPEX, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald
Beckwith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

November 15, 2005                           /s/ Gerald Beckwith
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Gerald Beckwith
                                            Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Renfrew,
Inc. for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2004, I, Zak W. Elgamal, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Renfrew, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended June 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Renfrew, Inc.

Dated:  August 12, 2004

RENFREW, INC.


By: /s/ Zak W. Elgamal
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Managed Futures Index Series.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                      
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                        
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                         
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                             
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Managed Futures Index Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: November 26, 2008
EXHIBIT 8

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Listed below are the significant subsidiaries within the NDS Group, all of which
do business under their legal name:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Legal name                                          Jurisdiction of incorporation    Proportion of ownership interest

<S>                                                       <C>                           <C>
NDS Limited                                             Great Britain                    100%

News Datacom Limited                                    Great Britain                    100%

NDS Technologies Israel Limited                         Israel                           100%

NDS Americas, Inc.                                      USA                              100%

NDS Asia Pacific Limited                                Hong Kong                        100%

Orbis Technology Limited                                Great Britain                    100%

Digi-Media Vision Limited                               Great Britain                    100%

NDS Asia Pacific Pty Limited                            Australia                        100%

NDS Marketing Israel Limited                            Israel                           100%

NDS Beijing Information Technology Company              China                            100%

Visionik A/S                                            Denmark                           72.4%(1)

Fancy a Flutter Limited                                 Great Britain                     80%(2)

</TABLE>

(1)  Rights attaching to the equity of Visionik A/S give NDS 72.4% of the total
     equity and 96.3% of the voting power.

(2)  Each vote carries one vote. The holder of the remaining 20% of the equity
     has a call option to purchase shares from NDS such that the Group's
     investment would be reduced to 50%. The option may be exercised during the
     period from 16 May 2004 to 15 June 2004, in which case the price will
     be(pound)1,350,000. Alternatively it may be exercised during the period 15
     April 2005 to 15 May 2005, in which case the price will be(pound)3,500,000.


                                       E-1
No. 38905.

#### Protest 431221-G of Gallagher & Ascher, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
No. 64206.

protest 59/33435 (New York).

#### Frederik Limning, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the' merchandise consists of vases in mineral colors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62694, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**ALESTRA, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Rolando Zubirán Shetler, the Chief Executive Officer of Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 

1. theCompany’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: March 30, 2005
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

d0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

142003

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142003 COA: 290352 Berrien CC: 2008-402980-FC OMAR NIGEL NELUMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 21, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 23 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (No. 333-35146 and No. 333-68280) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-111266 on Form S-3 of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. of our report dated April 2, 2004, with respect to the balance sheets of TippingPointTechnologies, Inc. as of January 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003, the month ended January 31, 2002 and the year ended December 31,2001, which report appears in the January 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Austin, Texas 

April 20, 2004
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1


TERMS OF AMENDED AND RESTATED CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


The form of Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement (the “Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.2 on the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014 contains blanks where the multiple of the executive’s base amount and the term of continued benefits provided under the Agreement vary for certain executives. On September 22, 2016, the Registrant entered into such an Agreement with the executive officers below, providing continued benefits for the term, and at the multiple of such executive's base amount, as listed in the following chart:


	
			
	Executive Officer
	Number of Times Base Amount Section (4a)
	Term of Continued Benefits Section (4 b & c)

	Maria N. Janes
	2 times
	24 months

	Executive Vice President and Controller
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Mary E. Noons
	2 times
	24 months

	Executive Vice President, Retail Lending
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE

MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TYLER THOMPSON

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 1925

LT Case No s

. 2021

- 300892

- CFDB

2021

- 300893

- CFDB

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Decision filed April 25, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County

, Elizabeth A. Blackburn , Judge.

Matthew J. Metz , Public Defender, and Steven N. Gosney, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport

, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS

, HARRIS and JAY , JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                 |  |                        
|---------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date:            |  |                        
|December 6, 2005 |  | /s/ John P. Manning    
|                 |  |                        
|                 |  | John P. Manning        
|                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                 |  |                        
|                 |  |                        



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.