```

[Senate Report 113-77]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                                       Calendar No. 140
113th Congress                                                   Report
                                 SENATE
 1st Session                                                     113-77

======================================================================

 
       DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2014
                                _______
                                

                 July 18, 2013.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

          Ms. Landrieu, from the Committee on Appropriations, 
                        submitted the following

                                 REPORT

                        [To accompany H.R. 2217]

    The Committee on Appropriations, to which was referred the 
bill (H.R. 2217) making appropriations for the Department of 
Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2014, and for other purposes, having considered the same, 
reports favorably thereon with an amendment and recommends that 
the bill, as amended, do pass.

Total obligational authority, fiscal year 2014

Total of bill as reported to the Senate\1\ \2\ \3\ \7\.. $46,413,386,000
Amount of 2013 appropriations\4\ \6\ \8\................  59,742,509,000
Amount of 2014 budget estimate\1\ \2\ \5\ \7\...........  46,114,108,000
Amount of House allowance...............................  46,077,222,000
Bill as recommended to Senate compared to--
    2013 appropriations................................. -13,329,123,000
    2014 budget estimate................................    +299,278,000
    House allowance.....................................    +336,164,000

\1\Committee recommendation includes $240,978,000 in rescissions, 
compared to $42,000,000 of proposed cancellations.
\2\Includes a permanent indefinite appropriation of $201,000,000 for the 
Coast Guard healthcare fund contribution.
\3\Includes $227,000,000 for the Coast Guard for the costs of overseas 
contingency operations.
\4\Includes rescissions totaling $306,999,999 pursuant to Public Law 
113-6. Includes permanent indefinite appropriation of $203,000,000 for 
the Coast Guard healthcare fund contribution. Includes $254,000,000 for 
the Coast Guard for the costs of overseas contingency operations.
\5\Excludes up to $227,033,000 for Coast Guard overseas contingency 
operations requested in Department of Defense ``Operation and 
Maintenance, Navy''.
\6\Includes $11,779,000,000 as disaster relief pursuant to Public Law 
112-25, and $6,692,908,000 as emergency funding pursuant to Public Law 
113-2, of which $6,108,735,000 is for the FEMA Disaster Relief Fund.
\7\Includes $5,626,386 for the FEMA Disaster Relief Fund designated by 
Congress as disaster relief pursuant to Public Law 112-25.
\8\Does not reflect March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 
112-25.

                                CONTENTS

                              ----------                              
                                                                   Page
Overview and Summary of the Bill.................................     5
Title I:
    Departmental Management and Operations:
        Office of the Secretary and Executive Management.........    10
        Office of the Under Secretary for Management.............    15
        Office of the Chief Financial Officer....................    18
        Office of the Chief Information Officer..................    21
        Analysis and Operations..................................    23
        Office of Inspector General..............................    24
Title II:
    Security, Enforcement, and Investigations:
        U.S. Customs and Border Protection:
            Salaries and Expenses................................    28
            Automation Modernization.............................    42
            Border Security Fencing, Infrastructure, and 
              Technology.........................................    43
            Air and Marine Operations............................    45
            Construction and Facilities Management...............    47
        U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement:
            Salaries and Expenses................................    49
            Automation Modernization.............................    56
            Construction.........................................    56
        Transportation Security Administration:
            Aviation Security....................................    57
            Surface Transportation Security......................    68
            Transportation Threat Assessment and Credentialing...    69
            Transportation Security Support......................    71
            Federal Air Marshals.................................    72
        United States Coast Guard:
            Operating Expenses...................................    74
            Environmental Compliance and Restoration.............    82
            Reserve Training.....................................    82
            Acquisition, Construction, and Improvements..........    83
            Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation..........    90
            Retired Pay..........................................    91
        United States Secret Service:
            Salaries and Expenses................................    91
            Acquisition, Construction, Improvements, and Related 
              Expenses...........................................    95
Title III:
    Protection, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery:
        National Protection and Programs Directorate:
            Management and Administration........................    96
            Infrastructure Protection and Information Security...    97
            Federal Protective Service...........................   103
            Office of Biometric Identity Management..............   105
        Office of Health Affairs.................................   106
        Federal Emergency Management Agency:
            Salaries and Expenses................................   110
            State and Local Programs.............................   115
            Firefighter Assistance Grants........................   120
            Emergency Management Performance Grants..............   120
            Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program..........   121
            United States Fire Administration....................   122
            Disaster Relief Fund.................................   122
            Flood Hazard Mapping and Risk Analysis...............   124
            National Flood Insurance Fund........................   125
            National Predisaster Mitigation Fund.................   126
            Emergency Food and Shelter...........................   127
Title IV:
    Research and Development, Training, and Services:
        United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.......   128
        Federal Law Enforcement Training Center:
            Salaries and Expenses................................   131
            Acquisitions, Construction, Improvements, and Related 
              Expenses...........................................   131
        Science and Technology:
            Management and Administration........................   132
            Research, Development, Acquisition, and Operations...   132
        Domestic Nuclear Detection Office:
            Management and Administration........................   137
            Research, Development, and Operations................   138
            Systems Acquisition..................................   139
Title V: General Provisions......................................   141
Program, Project, and Activity...................................   148
Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI of the Standing Rules of 
  the 
  Senate.........................................................   149
Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules 
  of the Senate..................................................   149
Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of 
  the Senate.....................................................   150
Budgetary Impact of Bill.........................................   168
Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority....................   169

                    OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY OF THE BILL

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Fiscal year 2014
                                  Fiscal year 2014        Committee
                                 request\1\ \2\ \3\   recommendation\1\
                                        \5\              \2\ \4\ \5\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title I--Departmental                $1,239,310,000       $1,053,879,000
 Management and Operations....
Title II--Security,                  31,633,338,000       31,975,885,000
 Enforcement, and
 Investigations...............
Title III--Protection,               11,009,402,000       11,581,840,000
 Preparedness, Response, and
 Recovery.....................
Title IV--Research and                2,214,058,000        1,885,260,000
 Development, Training, and
 Services.....................
Title V--General Provisions...           18,000,000          -83,478,000
                               -----------------------------------------
      Total, new budget              46,114,108,000       46,413,386,000
       (obligational
       authority).............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Committee recommendation includes $240,978,000 in rescissions,
  compared to $42,000,000 of proposed cancellations.
\2\Includes a permanent indefinite appropriation of $201,000,000 for the
  Coast Guard healthcare fund contribution.
\3\Excludes up to $227,033,000 for Coast Guard overseas contingency
  operations requested in Department of Defense ``Operation and
  Maintenance, Navy''.
\4\Includes $227,000,000 for the Coast Guard for the costs of overseas
  contingency operations.
\5\Includes $5,626,386,000 for the FEMA Disaster Relief Fund designated
  by Congress as disaster relief pursuant to Public Law 112-25.

    The Committee recommends a total appropriation of 
$46,413,386,000 for the Department of Homeland Security for 
fiscal year 2014, $299,278,000 more than the budget request. Of 
this amount, $44,953,386,000 is discretionary programs, 
including $227,000,000 for Coast Guard overseas contingency 
operations and $5,626,386,000 for the FEMA Disaster Relief Fund 
designated by Congress as disaster relief pursuant to Public 
Law 112-25.
    The Committee recommends discretionary appropriations, 
excluding Coast Guard overseas contingency operations and the 
FEMA Disaster Relief Fund adjustment of $39,100,000,000, 
$72,278,000 above the request. Even with this modest increase, 
this is the fourth year in a row that discretionary 
appropriations for the DHS have decreased.

                                Overview

    Within the past year, our Nation has witnessed a 
substantial rise in attempts and attacks on our country from 
home-grown terrorists. We face real threats from radicalized 
individuals here in the United States, as shown most recently 
by the Boston Marathon bombers and the arrest in Boise, Idaho, 
of an Uzbekistan national accused of conspiring with a 
designated terrorist organization in his home country, scheming 
to use a weapon of mass destruction, and distributing 
information about explosives and bombs. These events remind us 
that deranged or alienated individuals--often U.S. citizens or 
legal residents--can do enormous damage, particularly when 
inspired by larger notions of violent jihad.
    At the same time, individuals and terrorist groups abroad 
continue to focus on doing us harm. Even though Osama bin Laden 
and most of his top lieutenants are dead, our Nation is still 
threatened by al Qaeda affiliates and other international 
terrorists. From Yemen to Iraq, from Somalia to North Africa, 
from the Pakistani Taliban to Syria, the threat today is more 
diffuse, with al Qaeda's affiliate in the Arabian Peninsula--
AQAP--being the most active in plotting against our homeland. 
While there have been no successful large-scale attacks on the 
United States, plots have been thwarted. For example, in April, 
there was a plot to blow up a rail line between United States 
and Canada. And the aviation system continues to face repeated 
threats from international operatives. In addition, 
cybersecurity threats continue to evolve at an alarming rate 
with 250,000 probes/attacks on U.S. Government networks an hour 
and global costs of over $1,000,000,000 in direct financial 
loss, the cost of remediating cyber attacks, and loss of 
intellectual property. In an age where ideas and images can 
travel the globe in a minute, we must continue to be vigilant 
and strengthen our law enforcement defenses to make American 
targets harder to strike. This bill does just that. For 
example:
  --At U.S. Customs and Border Protection [CBP], the bill 
        recommends hiring more than 1,850 new CBP officers at 
        our ports of entry to facilitate the processing of 
        legitimate trade and travelers while preventing entry 
        of those would do us harm.
  --At U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE], special 
        agents have already seized more than $1,000,000,000 in 
        currency seizure and made more than 6,000 criminal 
        arrests. The bill provides nearly $25,000,000 for human 
        trafficking and smuggling investigations as well as 
        investigations in commercial trade fraud.
  --At the Transportation Security Administration, the bill 
        includes $189,154,000 for explosives detection 
        technologies to screen passengers and their belongings 
        at airports and $105,919,000 for Secure Flight, which 
        matches passenger data against portions of the 
        Terrorist Screening Database.
  --For cybersecurity, the bill recommends a total of 
        $803,827,000 for cybersecurity protection of Federal 
        networks and incident response, $47,997,000 above 
        fiscal year 2013. This amount includes $15,824,000 for 
        cybersecurity education to train future cyber warriors.
  --A total of $404,000,000 is included for construction of the 
        National Bio and Agro Defense Facility, which is being 
        built to prevent the accidental or intentional 
        introduction of deadly animal diseases into the United 
        States.
  --A total of $98,000,000, $5,000,000 above fiscal year 2013, 
        for first responder weapons of mass destruction 
        training.
  --A total of $29,868,000 above the fiscal year 2013 level is 
        provided to strengthen the Department's ability to 
        safeguard and share classified information with its 
        Federal, State, and local partners, and to help deter 
        the unauthorized release of such information. In the 
        wake of past and recent public disclosures of critical 
        national security information, such safeguards are 
        vital to ensuring effective controls are in place to 
        prevent the illicit removal and dissemination of 
        classified information.
  --A total of $10,504,000 for the Office of Bombing Prevention 
        to advance training, analysis, and awareness.
  --A total of $35,180,000 for Urban Search and Rescue Teams 
        for location, rescue, and initial medical care of 
        people in large scale disasters.
  --An additional $3,000,000 is included for the ``If You See 
        Something, Say Something'' campaign to raise public 
        awareness on indicators of terrorism.
  --A total of $1,962,000 for efforts to counter domestic 
        violent extremism, $135,000 above fiscal year 2013. 
        Given the terrorist attacks in Boston, the Department 
        should be strengthening and expanding its activities to 
        counter violent extremism in the coming months and 
        year.
    While threats continue to be a serious concern, we also 
face unpredictable and sometimes dire natural disasters that 
have a significant impact on our cities and rural communities. 
Within the last year, for example, New York, New Jersey and 
Connecticut were devastated by Hurricane Sandy, which was the 
second most costly hurricane in history. Similarly, the State 
of Oklahoma was recently hit by severe tornados that wiped out 
the town of Moore, Oklahoma. In 2011, there were a total of 242 
declared disasters including Federal disasters, emergency 
declarations and fire management declarations, almost 100 more 
than seen in any other year. For 2012, there were 112, with 
fire topping the number of Federal declarations. DHS must be 
prepared for and nimbly able to support such natural disaster 
response. This bill provides the resources for DHS to do so in 
fiscal year 2014, including $6,220,908,000 through the Disaster 
Relief Fund to recover from previous events and respond to 
future disasters.
    At the same time, DHS must also ensure that its other 
legacy and statutory missions, such as enforcing our 
immigration laws, facilitating legitimate travel and trade, 
protecting our currency, interdicting drugs and migrants, 
responding to oil spills, and rescuing those in need are 
sufficiently provided for. The bill does so by ensuring that 
these missions have adequate resources in part by refocusing 
resources on those areas that the Committee believes were 
underfunded in the fiscal year 2014 request or by supplementing 
request levels for enhancements to fill technological 
limitations. For example:
  --The recommendation for the Coast Guard includes several 
        increases above the request, including $16,000,000 and 
        242 positions to enhance drug and migrant interdiction 
        efforts, $278,568,000 to acquire new vessels 
        desperately needed to replace an aging fleet, 
        $1,000,000 and six positions to enhance the Coast 
        Guard's sexual assault response and prevention program, 
        and $13,000,000 above the request to restore 600 
        reservists to active status, which will enable the 
        Coast Guard to retain the majority of the first 
        responders proposed for reduction.
  --The bill recommends a total of $1,502,000,000 for first 
        responder grants, $37,853,000 above the fiscal year 
        2013 to provide for the protection of infrastructure 
        and the readiness of police, firefighters, public 
        health officials and emergency managers in States, 
        urban areas, ports, and transit systems.
  --At CBP, the bill increases traveler targeting and 
        processing systems by more than $10,000,000 above the 
        request, for a total of more than $28,000,000.
  --The bill funds detention beds at ICE beds at $41,000,000 
        above the request and increases funds for alternatives 
        to detention by nearly $24,000,000 above the request.
  --The bill restores damaging proposed cuts to Secret Service 
        agents who protect the First Family and other 
        individuals while also conducting investigations into 
        counterfeiting the currency and securing financial 
        networks.
  --And to assist people lawfully present in this country who 
        wish to become U.S. citizens, a total of $10,000,000 is 
        provided for immigrant integration grants.
    All of this must be done with fiscal restraint in mind. The 
answers to our homeland security challenges do not always 
involve spending more money. DHS can also improve its programs 
by refocusing its priorities to root out fraud, waste, and 
abuse, and alter what does not work well in the Department for 
those actions that truly make a difference. In addition, DHS 
must make a concerted effort to work with other key Federal, 
State, local and international partners to ensure our broader 
national strategy to maintain a secure and resilient country is 
achieved as DHS-related programs cannot do this in a vacuum. 
For fiscal year 2014, the Committee recommends continuing major 
reforms as well as puts new ones in place to strengthen and 
streamline the Department.
  --The bill approves over $1,300,000,000 in requested 
        administrative cost savings.
  --The bill allows for the decommissioning of two Coast Guard 
        patrol boats that have become too expensive to 
        maintain, saving nearly $3,000,000.
  --The bill includes funding for six critically needed Coast 
        Guard Fast Response Cutters (instead of two requested). 
        Procuring six maximizes the production line and 
        generates cost savings of at least $5,000,000 per hull 
        for a total savings to the taxpayers of $30,000,000.
  --The bill calls for the Department to reduce the number of 
        expensive offline travel bookings when online bookings 
        are much cheaper. The report requires the Inspector 
        General to examine travel costs to identify excessive 
        expenditures and identify areas of savings.
  --A series of energy conservation efforts are included for 
        fiscal year 2014, which will allow the Federal Law 
        Enforcement Training Center to save approximately 
        $2,000,000 and, with the installation of photovoltaic 
        equipment, avoid paying energy costs totaling 
        $2,500,000 at its Cheltenham facility.
  --The bill rejects the unauthorized National Preparedness 
        Grant proposal, waiting for the appropriate authorizing 
        Committees to act.
  --The bill includes 16 statutorily mandated expenditure plans 
        for robust congressional oversight. In addition, there 
        are another 11 expenditure plans in the report. The 
        Committee encourages DHS to issue these reports in an 
        unclassified format so that they can be available to 
        the public, to the maximum extent practicable.
  --The bill continues annual and monthly reporting 
        requirements for expenditures from the Disaster Relief 
        Fund and directs FEMA to make these reports available 
        to the public no later than 10 days after the close of 
        each month.
  --The bill continues a monthly obligation, expenditure, and 
        staffing reporting requirement. Delivery of these 
        reports is now required within 30 days after the end of 
        the month, to better oversee expenditures.
  --The bill includes 7 multiyear investment reports so that 
        the Committee can better track when acquisitions and 
        procurements are required for large capital programs.
  --The bill rejects the Department's request to realign the 
        Office of Policy, making three of its offices direct 
        reports to the Secretary. This is inconsistent with 
        consolidation elsewhere in the Department.
    In conclusion, the recommendations contained in this bill 
sustain the Department of Homeland Security's vital front line 
security operations, while providing resources for the 
Department to nimbly react to the latest threat, either man-
made or natural, and assuring sufficient management and 
administrative oversight to ensure fiscal responsibility and 
wise investments of taxpayer money.

                               References

    This report refers to several Public Laws by short title as 
follows: the Budget Control Act of 2011, Public Law 112-25, is 
referenced as the BCA; American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 
of 2009, Public Law 111-5, is referenced as ARRA; Implementing 
Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, Public Law 
110-53, is referenced as the 9/11 Act; Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Public Law 93-
288, is referenced as the Stafford Act; and Intelligence Reform 
and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Public Law 108-458, is 
referenced as the Intelligence Reform Act.
    Any reference in this report to the Secretary shall be 
interpreted to mean the Secretary of Homeland Security.
    Any reference to the Department or DHS shall be interpreted 
to mean the Department of Homeland Security.
    Any reference in this report to a departmental component 
shall be interpreted to mean directorates, components, offices, 
or other organizations in the Department of Homeland Security.
    Any reference to FTE shall mean full-time equivalents.
    Any reference to PPA shall mean program, project, and 
activity.
    Any reference to HSPD shall mean Homeland Security 
Presidential Directive.
    Any reference to GAO shall mean Government Accountability 
Office.
    Any reference to the OIG shall mean the Office of Inspector 
General of the Department of Homeland Security.

                    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

                                TITLE I

                 DEPARTMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS

            Office of the Secretary and Executive Management

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $129,827,000
Budget Estimate, 2014...................................     126,554,000
House allowance.........................................     100,408,000
Committee recommendation................................     123,600,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Office of the Secretary and Executive Management 
supports the Department by providing direction, management, and 
policy guidance to operating components. The specific 
activities funded by this account include: the Immediate Office 
of the Secretary; the Immediate Office of the Deputy Secretary; 
the Office of the Chief of Staff; the Office of the Executive 
Secretary; the Office of Policy; the Office of Public Affairs; 
the Office of Legislative Affairs; the Office of the General 
Counsel; the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties; the 
Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman; the Office of 
Intergovernmental Affairs; and the Privacy Officer.

                        COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

    The Committee recommends $123,600,000 for the Office of the 
Secretary and Executive Management. This is $2,954,000 below 
the amount requested and $6,227,000 below the amount provided 
in fiscal year 2013. Of this amount, the Committee recommends 
not to exceed $45,000 for official reception and representation 
expenses.
    The Committee includes the requested programmatic increases 
for the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties [OCRCL], 
including $1,327,000 for OCRCL to ensure that the Department's 
immigration efforts comply with all applicable civil rights 
statutes and constitutional requirements. The Committee directs 
that a briefing on the program be provided no later than 60 
days after the date of enactment of this act. The briefing is 
to be conducted jointly by OCRCL and U.S. Immigration and 
Customs Enforcement [ICE] officials.
    In the President's counterterrorism speech on May 23, 2013, 
he said the Nation ``faces a real threat from radicalized 
individuals here in the United States''. The Committee includes 
the requested program increase of $135,000 and a total of 
$1,962,000 for OCRCL efforts to counter domestic violent 
extremism. Given the terrorist attacks in Boston, the 
Department should be strengthening and expanding its activities 
to counter violent extremism in the coming months and year. The 
Department shall provide a briefing to the Committee no later 
than 60 days after the date of enactment of this act, on how 
the DHS Counter Violent Extremism [CVE] efforts are being 
expanded, including community engagement, CVE training for 
communities and law enforcement, and increased analytical 
intelligence support to State and Local law enforcement.
    The recommendation includes the requested increase of 
$3,000,000 to expand the ``If You See Something, Say 
Something'' public awareness campaign. This campaign has proven 
to be effective in engaging the public in identifying and 
reporting on indicators of terrorism and terrorism-related 
crime. The increase will enable the Department to expand the 
campaign to focus on prevention, mitigation, and response to 
violent incidents like mass shooting and mass casualty events.
    The Committee again denies the budget proposal to create 
separate budget line items for the Office of International 
Affairs, the Office of State and Local Law Enforcement, and the 
Private Sector Office, which are all currently funded within 
the Office of Policy. The Department has not supplied the 
Committee with a compelling rationale for why these offices 
need to be stand alone entities within the Office of the 
Secretary and Executive Management, given that these functions 
have been performed adequately within the Office of Policy.
    The specific levels recommended by the Committee as 
compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget request levels are 
as follows:

                                OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Fiscal year      Fiscal year
                                                               2013 enacted\1\    2014 budget       Committee
                                                                                    request      recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Immediate Office of the Secretary............................            4,280            4,128            4,100
Immediate Office of the Deputy Secretary.....................            2,091            1,822            1,800
Office of the Chief of Staff.................................            2,172            2,200            2,100
Executive Secretary..........................................            7,582            7,603            7,500
Office of Policy.............................................           43,692           27,815        \2\37,000
Office of Public Affairs.....................................            5,468            8,661            8,600
Office of Legislative Affairs................................            5,792            5,498            5,400
Office of Intergovernmental Affairs..........................            2,377            2,518            2,300
Office of General Counsel....................................           21,130           21,000           20,000
Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties..................           21,611           21,678           21,500
Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman...............            5,643            5,344            5,300
Privacy Officer..............................................            7,989            8,143            8,000
Office of International Affairs..............................            (\3\)            7,626            (\3\)
Office of State and Local Law Enforcement....................            (\3\)              852            (\3\)
Private Sector Office........................................            (\3\)            1,666            (\3\)
                                                              --------------------------------------------------
      Total, Office of the Secretary and Executive Management          129,827          126,554          123,600
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.
\2\Includes funds for the Office of International Affairs, Office of State and Local Law Enforcement, and the
  Private Sector Office.
\3\Funded under the Office of Policy.

                           EXPENDITURE PLANS

    The bill includes language directing the Secretary to 
submit expenditure plans to the Committee no later than 90 days 
after the date of enactment of this act for the Offices of 
Policy, Intergovernmental Affairs, Civil Rights and Civil 
Liberties, Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman, and 
Privacy. Each plan shall include details on: staffing by 
programmatic function area, expenses, contracts, obligations, 
funds by sub-offices (if appropriate), and how resources are 
aligned to specific activities and initiatives in fiscal year 
2014.

                            EVOLVING THREATS

    The demands on the Department of Homeland Security continue 
to grow as the threats from terrorism persistently evolve. 
Whether it is homegrown terrorism; cyber intrusions; 
biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks; food tampering; 
surgically implanted explosives; animal diseases; or varying 
locations and means for crossing our borders (such as tunnels), 
the Department must be able to respond and adapt swiftly to 
interdict these threats at the earliest point possible. 
Further, naturally occurring events put our Nation at risk. 
Severe storms and wildfires are growing more frequent and 
larger and earthquakes threaten major population areas, posing 
a risk to critical infrastructure. DHS is to continue quarterly 
briefings to the Committee on how it is addressing these 
evolving threats.

                            TRAVEL BOOKINGS

    The Committee is concerned with the excessive costs being 
incurred by Departmental entities with regard to travel 
reservations. While the Department's policy requires the use of 
online booking systems in all cases, with few exceptions, cost 
data received by the Committee indicates that travel 
reservations are heavily skewed towards offline reservations. 
In fiscal year 2012, the Department spent $5,306,524 on travel 
reservations, of which $4,446,329 were from reservations made 
offline. Making reservations through online booking can save 
millions of dollars as compared to offline booking, 
specifically 73 percent less for a domestic airline ticket and 
75 percent for an international airline ticket. The Department 
must continue to emphasize frugality by cutting costs and 
streamlining processes wherever possible. Therefore, the 
Department is expected to significantly reduce the number of 
offline reservations in fiscal year 2014. Further, the 
Committee directs the Inspector General to examine these travel 
costs to identify excessive expenditures and identify areas of 
savings.

                       EFFICIENCY REVIEW PROGRAM

    In March of 2009, the Department began an efficiency review 
process aimed at cutting overhead and administrative costs, 
streamlining operations, and creating a culture of efficiency 
throughout the Department. According to the Department's fiscal 
year 2014 budget, more than $4,000,000,000 in cost avoidances 
and reductions has occurred, with the redeployment of those 
funds to the Department's most mission-critical programs. In 
November of 2012, the Department had an independent third party 
conduct an assessment of the status and effectiveness of the 
efficiency review program. The review concluded that the 
program has been initially successful in creating cost 
avoidances, but found that the program ``is limited by the 
scope of its mission, its organizational model, resource 
allocation from Headquarters/Components, and its linkages to 
various management structures with the Department.'' The review 
made recommendations for common sense improvements to conduct 
operations more efficiently as a Department, such as linking 
the efficiency program to existing departmental governance 
structures, emphasizing consistency in efficiency review 
investments across all components, expanding metrics reporting, 
and expanding the efficiency review to areas beyond the mission 
support enterprise. DHS is to brief the Committee on the 
implementation of these recommendations no later than 60 days 
after the date of enactment of this act.

           COORDINATION OF FEDERAL CHEMICAL SECURITY EFFORTS

    Since fiscal year 2010, the Committee has required the 
Department to report on the coordination of chemical security 
efforts, both within the Department and across departments and 
agencies. Specifically, this report comes from the Deputy 
Secretary semiannually and the Committee continues the 
requirement. While NPPD and Coast Guard have made substantial 
progress formalizing and beginning to align their respective 
programs, these same efforts need to be completed with TSA. 
Additionally, beyond DHS, the tragic chemical facility incident 
in West, Texas revealed gaps among Federal and State agencies. 
The Committee notes that while the President assigned DHS the 
overarching coordination responsibility related to chemical 
security through Homeland Security Presidential Directive-7, 
DHS should work in conjunction with the Office of Management 
and Budget to review and synchronize Federal entities involved 
in chemical security activities. Under the heading National 
Protection and Programs Directorate, the Committee includes a 
requirement for the Chemical Sector Coordination Council to 
develop recommendations to improve coordination among Federal 
agencies, streamline reporting requirements, and improve the 
Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program in an effort 
to garner stakeholder input.

                               USER FEES

    The Committee directs the Secretary to continue quarterly 
updates on user fees as originally directed in the conference 
report accompanying Public Law 111-83.

                     DEPARTMENTAL INTEGRITY EFFORTS

    The Committee is pleased with the work that has been done 
to solidify the investigative relationship between the OIG and 
CBP regarding corruption investigations. The Committee directs 
the Deputy Secretary, jointly with the OIG, CBP, and ICE, to 
submit a status update report, not later than 60 days after the 
date of enactment of this act, outlining the specific steps 
being taken to further address the process for investigating 
cases of corruption of DHS employees, and outline the plan to 
address, as a unified DHS, the engagement of DHS with the 
Department of Justice's Border Corruption Task Forces. The 
Senate-passed immigration reform legislation envisions the 
hiring of approximately 25,000 additional Border Patrol agents, 
Customs and Border Protection officers, and immigration 
enforcement and processing personnel. Such a massive level of 
hiring would place significant burdens on human resource 
personnel and the affected agencies. The Committee directs the 
Department to develop a hiring strategy detailing the steps 
which need to be taken to rigorously perform background 
investigations on potential new hires, the number of 
polygraphers to be hired, and other necessary steps to be 
prepared to begin the hiring process the day after any 
legislation is signed into law. The DHS Inspector General shall 
also review the integrity aspect of this hiring strategy and 
provide input and suggestions as appropriate.

                 RECEPTION AND REPRESENTATION EXPENSES

    Within the total amount recommended for the Office of the 
Secretary and Executive Management, up to $45,000 is included 
for reception and representation expenses. The Department is 
directed to submit quarterly reports to the Committee listing 
obligations for all DHS reception and representation expenses 
by purpose and dollar amount, at a level of detail provided in 
fiscal year 2013 and 2014, or in greater detail if that is 
required to explain how funds were used. In recognition of a 
more constrained budget environment and to limit opportunities 
for waste and abuse, the Committee maintains the 12 percent 
reduction implemented over the past two fiscal years for 
reception and representation expenses.

                             OVERHEAD COSTS

    The President issued Executive Order 13589 on November 9, 
2011, directing Federal agencies to plan for reducing the 
combined costs of certain activities by not less than 20 
percent below fiscal year 2010 levels in fiscal year 2013. The 
Department should continue to seek to reduce operating expenses 
by placing greater scrutiny on overhead costs and looking at 
creative ways to achieve efficiencies. For example, field 
personnel could take advantage of mobile technology and 
automation to reduce labor-intensive and paper-based incident 
reporting. This would also have benefits to operations, such as 
facilitating a near real-time picture of operations for field 
and headquarters leadership. The Committee directs the 
Department to provide a briefing on the cost reductions 
achieved by the Department in fiscal year 2013 and its plan to 
reduce overhead costs within 60 days after the date of 
enactment of this act to include the areas identified in 
Executive Order 13589 as well as consolidating and reducing 
administrative and mission support personnel, as appropriate; 
consolidating and reducing contractor support, as appropriate; 
taking advantage of mobile technology and automation to reduce 
certain support personnel needs; and better managing and 
reducing overtime costs.

           FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS

    The Department is directed to report semi-annually to the 
Committee on the current projects tasked to Federally Funded 
Research and Development Centers [FFRDCs], the funding 
obligated by component, including the purposes for the funds, 
and any projects completed in the prior 6-month period, with 
the first report due February 14, 2014. The Committee has yet 
to receive a report in fiscal year 2013 and reports for prior 
years were submitted well after the required due dates and 
failed to fully describe individual projects and the purpose 
they served. The Committee expects more robust project 
descriptions of individual projects and a more timely 
submission.

           EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND RESCUE LOCATION INFORMATION

    The United States National Grid [USNG] was developed in 
cooperation with the United States Geological Survey and 
National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, and it has since been 
adopted by a number of States. The Committee encourages the 
Department to continue to support awareness, adoption, 
implementation, and tactical use of the USNG for emergency 
response and rescue scenarios in cooperation with appropriate 
outside partners, including those in academia. Further, the 
Committee directs the Department to submit a report no later 
than 180 days after the date of enactment of this act on what 
training is currently available, what challenges there are in 
disseminating the USNG, and what partners have collaborated in 
training.

               PUBLIC ACCESS TO FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH

    In February of 2013, the Office of Science and Technology 
Policy, Executive Office of the President issued guidelines on 
increasing public access to the results of federally funded 
scientific research. Given the importance of the research 
funded by the Office of Health Affairs, the Science and 
Technology Directorate, and the Domestic Nuclear Detection 
Office, the Committee encourages the Department to 
expeditiously comply.

              Office of the Under Secretary for Management

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $218,223,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     202,686,000
House allowance.........................................     132,830,000
Committee recommendation................................     198,200,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Under Secretary for Management oversees management and 
operations of the Department, including procurement and 
acquisition, human capital, and property management. The 
specific activities funded by this account include the 
Immediate Office of the Under Secretary for Management, the 
Office of the Chief Security Officer, the Office of the Chief 
Procurement Officer, the Office of the Chief Human Capital 
Officer, and the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer.

                        COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

    The Committee recommends $198,200,000 for the Under 
Secretary for Management. This is $4,486,000 below the amount 
requested and $20,023,000 below the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013. Of this amount, the Committee recommends not to 
exceed $2,250 for official reception and representation 
expenses. The Committee's recommendation includes funding for 
oversight of major acquisitions, recruitment and development of 
a skilled workforce, and security measures to safeguard DHS 
personnel, property, facilities, and information. The Committee 
supports the one-DHS concept, which can only be executed when 
such missions are appropriately funded. Effective government is 
not accomplished through excessive funding cuts for these 
essential capabilities. Unless specifically addressed in this 
report, the small reductions taken to individual offices below 
the request are due to a constrained budget environment and to 
focus limited resources on the Department's critical 
operational missions.
    The specific levels recommended by the Committee, as 
compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget request levels, are 
as follows:

                                  OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Immediate Office of the Under Secretary for Management....             3,096             2,735             2,700
Office of the Chief Security Officer......................            68,909            66,025            65,000
Office of the Chief Procurement Officer...................            71,905            66,915            66,000
Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer:
    Salaries and Expenses.................................            24,938            22,276            22,000
    Human Resources Information Technology Program........             9,667             9,213             8,000
Office of the Chief Administrative Officer:
    Salaries and expenses.................................            34,267            30,793            30,000
    Nebraska Avenue Complex...............................             5,441             4,729             4,500
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Office of the Under Secretary for Management.           218,223           202,686           198,200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

         COMPREHENSIVE AND QUARTERLY ACQUISITION STATUS REPORTS

    In order to obtain the information necessary for in-depth 
congressional oversight, statutory language is included in this 
act that requires a Comprehensive Acquisition Status Report to 
be included as part of the submission of the President's fiscal 
year 2015 budget, with quarterly updates to be submitted 45 
days after the completion of each quarter. The requirements for 
the reports are addressed below.
    The Comprehensive Acquisition Status Report shall include 
programs identified for Major Acquisition Oversight as defined 
in the Department memorandum titled ``Department of Homeland 
Security Major Acquisition Oversight List'' dated January 25, 
2011, and programs that have been classified for major 
acquisition oversight subsequent to the referenced memorandum. 
The Comprehensive Acquisition Status Report shall include for 
each major acquisition:
  --A narrative description to include current gaps and 
        shortfalls, the capabilities to be fielded, and the 
        number of planned increments and/or units;
  --Acquisition Review Board (or other board designated to 
        review the acquisition) status of each acquisition, 
        including the current acquisition phase, the date of 
        the last review and a listing of the required documents 
        that have been reviewed with the dates reviewed and/or 
        approved;
  --The most current approved Acquisition Program Baseline (to 
        include project schedules and events);
  --A comparison of the original Acquisition Program Baseline, 
        the current Acquisition Program Baseline, and the 
        current estimate;
  --Whether or not an Independent Verification and Validation 
        has been implemented, with an explanation for the 
        decision and a summary of any findings;
  --A rating of cost risk, schedule risk, and technical risk 
        associated with the program (including narrative 
        descriptions and mitigation actions);
  --Contract status (to include earned value management data as 
        applicable);
  --A life-cycle cost of the acquisition and time basis for the 
        estimate;
  --A planned procurement schedule, including the best estimate 
        of the annual cost and increments/units to be procured 
        annually until procurement is complete;
  --A table delineated by appropriation that provides (for 
        prior years; past year; current year; budget year; 
        budget year plus one; budget year plus two; budget year 
        plus three; budget year plus four and beyond; and total 
        cost) the actual or estimated appropriations, 
        obligations, unobligated authority, and planned 
        expenditures;
  --The reason for any significant changes (from the previous 
        comprehensive report) in acquisition quantity, cost, or 
        schedule;
  --Key Events/Milestones from the prior fiscal year; and
  --Key Events/Milestones for the current fiscal year.
    Quarterly reports shall include:
  --An updated status report on any major acquisition for which 
        there has been an approved or a new acquisition program 
        baseline, a new acquisition decision memorandum, or 
        where there has been significant deviation from the 
        prior report with respect to acquisition cost, 
        quantity, or schedule (a significant change is any 
        deviation in cost or quantity that exceeds 8 percent or 
        any change in schedule that exceeds 6 months).
  --A table depicting the title of the program, quantity and 
        cost based on the original Acquisition Program 
        Baseline, quantity and cost based on the most current 
        acquisition program baseline, the quantity and cost of 
        the most current estimate, and the explanation for any 
        change in quantity and cost from prior reports.
  --If applicable, a copy of the acquisition decision 
        memorandum, together with a copy of the Letter of 
        Assessment signed by the Director of Testing and 
        Evaluation.

                        LESSONS LEARNED REVIEWS

    A recent GAO report (GAO-13-256) found that ``conducting 
lessons learned reviews when programs are canceled benefits 
organizations by identifying things that worked well and did 
not work well in order to improve future acquisitions 
programs.'' According to GAO's review, there is no firm 
requirement within the Department's acquisition guidance to 
conduct reviews if an acquisition program is cancelled. GAO 
recommended that DHS should require the publication of a 
lessons learned reports to increase the likelihood that future 
acquisitions will succeed. Therefore, consistent with GAO's 
recommendation, the Department is to revise its acquisition 
instruction manual to require a process and mechanism for 
collecting and distributing lessons learned.

                      BALANCED WORKFORCE STRATEGY

    The Committee supports the Department's efforts to 
determine the proper balance of Federal and contractor 
employees for programs and functions of the Department. The 
Committee recognizes that this is an evolving and continuous 
process, but progress and milestones are necessary to judge the 
success of these efforts. Based on the Department's latest 
report on the Balanced Workforce Strategy, recent attempts to 
collect updated information on the effects of insourcing have 
been insufficient. As a result, the Department is planning to 
release more robust reporting guidance in August 2013 to 
components to provide a more comprehensive summary of the 
Balanced Workforce Strategy. The Department is directed to 
submit the results of this effort to the Committee by April 1, 
2014.

                       HEADQUARTERS CONSOLIDATION

    A general provision is included providing $43,300,000 for 
the ``Office of the Under Secretary for Management'' for costs 
associated with headquarters consolidation and mission support 
consolidation. In addition, $12,800,000 is recommended in Coast 
Guard ``Operating Expenses'' to support the Coast Guard at St. 
Elizabeths. The Under Secretary shall submit an expenditure 
plan no later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this 
act detailing how these funds will be allocated, including a 
revised schedule and cost estimates for headquarters 
consolidation. Quarterly briefings are required on headquarters 
and mission support consolidation activities, including any 
deviation from the expenditure plan.

                 Office of the Chief Financial Officer

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     $51,432,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      48,779,000
House allowance.........................................      31,242,000
Committee recommendation................................      48,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Office of the Chief Financial Officer is responsible 
for the fiscal management and financial accountability of the 
Department of Homeland Security. The Office of the Chief 
Financial Officer provides guidance and oversight of the 
Department's budget execution while ensuring that funds are 
allocated and expended in accordance with relevant laws and 
policies. This account funds the Budget Division, Office of 
Financial Operations, Office of Program Analysis and 
Evaluation, Office of Financial Management, Resource Management 
Transition Office, and the Office of the Government 
Accountability Office/Office of Inspector General Audit 
Liaison.

                        COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

    The Committee recommends $48,000,000 for the Office of the 
Chief Financial Office [OCFO]. This is $779,000 below the 
amount requested and $3,432,000 below the amount provided in 
fiscal year 2013.

                       COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT

    The Committee assumes the cost of living adjustment for 
civilian employees across the Department will be absorbed 
within amounts appropriated in this act.

                    FINANCIAL SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION

    The Committee recognizes the Department's need to improve 
the reliability and transparency of its financial data, and 
directs DHS to maintain frequent communications with the 
Committee on financial management improvement plans necessary 
to support the Department's missions, including total resource 
requirements by fiscal year and a timeline for implementation 
with discrete milestones. The Committee includes $4,000,000 for 
the OCFO to provide governance and oversight of the Component's 
migration to a financial systems solution. The bill includes 
$29,500,000 in the Coast Guard's ``Operating Expenses'' 
appropriation for the migration of its financial management 
system in fiscal year 2014 that will also support TSA and the 
Domestic Nuclear Detection Office.

                  BUDGET EXECUTION AND STAFFING REPORT

    The Committee continues and modifies a general provision 
requiring the Department to continue to submit to the House and 
Senate Committees on Appropriations a monthly budget execution 
report showing the status of obligations and costs for all 
components of the Department and on-board staffing levels 
(Federal employees and contractors). The report shall include 
the total obligational authority appropriated (new budget 
authority plus unobligated carryover), undistributed 
obligational authority, amount allotted, current year 
obligations, unobligated authority (the difference between 
total obligational authority and current year obligations), 
beginning unexpended obligations, year-to-date costs, and 
ending unexpended obligations. This budget execution 
information is to be provided at the level of detail shown in 
the tables displayed at the end of this report for each 
departmental component and the Working Capital Fund. The 
Committee commends the OCFO for its progress in automating the 
data extraction for this report. In the past, this process has 
been manual, creating a long lag time for reporting the budget 
data to the Committee. With an automated process, the 
Department will be able to submit these reports to the 
Committee in a more timely manner. Therefore, the requirement 
in the bill has been modified requiring this report to be 
submitted no later than 30 days after the close of each month 
instead of the previous requirement of 45 days.

                           EXPENDITURE PLANS

    The Committee continues requiring expenditure plans for 
specific DHS programs. These plans are intended to provide 
Congress with information to effectively oversee a particular 
program and hold the Department accountable for program 
results. Expenditure plans required by the Committee shall 
include, at a minimum: a description of how the plan satisfies 
any relevant legislative conditions for the expenditure plan; 
planned capabilities and benefits; cost and schedule 
commitments; measures of progress against commitments made in 
previous plans; how the program is being managed to provide 
reasonable assurance that the promised program capabilities, 
benefits, and cost and schedule commitments will be achieved; 
historical funding for the program, if applicable; and an 
obligation and outlay schedule.

                              CONFERENCES

    The Committee includes a general provision directing the 
Secretary to submit an annual report to the Inspector General 
regarding the purpose, participation, cost, and contracting 
procedures for each conference held in fiscal year 2014 that 
exceeds $100,000. A recent audit by the OIG (OIG-13-96) found 
that while the Department has made improvements to better 
oversee conference spending, it needs to institute stronger 
oversight from the Chief Financial Officer to ensure that 
components are submitting all conferences for review and 
approval, there is better tracking of conference attendance, 
that components update guidance on conference policy 
requirements, and that an Annual Quality Control Review is 
conducted for fiscal year 2013 and future fiscal years. The 
Committee directs DHS to comply with the OIG recommendations 
not later than January 31, 2014.

                      ANNUAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATIONS

    The Chief Financial Officer is directed to ensure that 
fiscal year 2015 budget justifications for classified and 
unclassified budgets of all Department components are submitted 
on February 3, 2014, concurrent with the President's budget 
submission to Congress. The justifications shall include:
  --Detailed data and explanatory descriptions for each 
        appropriations request, and for each PPA reflected in 
        the table accompanying this statement, including 
        offices that have been identified as PPAs. Information 
        regarding actual and planned accomplishments should be 
        in quantifiable terms and demonstrate a direct 
        relationship to funding;
  --Tables that reflect actual and estimated funding by PPA for 
        fiscal years 2014 and 2015; identify each increase, 
        decrease, transfer, and staffing change proposed in 
        fiscal year 2015; and explain such year-to-year changes 
        in terms that are clear and unambiguous, and exclude 
        nonspecific terms such as ``technical adjustment'' or 
        ``administrative savings'' unless accompanied by a 
        detailed explanation. To establish a common baseline 
        reference, the fiscal year 2014 discretionary data 
        shall tie to the fiscal year 2014 discretionary total 
        in the table accompanying this statement or have a 
        table identifying each change. Explanations of 
        adjustments to base funding, whether increases or 
        decreases, should be specific, and programmatic changes 
        and initiatives should be clearly identified and 
        justified;
  --For each PPA that is comprised of acquisition and 
        procurement activity, the justification should address 
        all proposed spending using a zero-based budget 
        description;
  --Information by appropriations account and PPA on all 
        reimbursable agreements and significant uses of the 
        Economy Act for each fiscal year;
  --An accurate detailed table identifying the last year that 
        authorizing legislation was enacted into law for each 
        PPA, including the amount of the authorization and the 
        appropriation in the last year of authorization;
  --The text and citation of all Department appropriations 
        provisions enacted to date that are permanent law;
  --Explanations and justifications for all proposed 
        legislative language changes, whether they are new or 
        amend existing law, whether they are substantive or 
        technical in nature, with an annotated comparison of 
        proposed versus existing language; and
  --A report on the status of overdue Committee reports, plans, 
        and briefings for each of fiscal years 2013 and 2014.

                 FUTURE YEARS HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM

    Consistent with section 874 of Public Law 107-296, the 
Department shall submit a Future Years Homeland Security 
Program budget as part of the fiscal year 2015 budget 
justification. The report is to display funding by 
appropriation account and subordinate program, project, or 
activity. Further the report is to provide a 5-year capital 
investment plan for all major acquisitions. The report shall be 
in unclassified form so as to be accessible to the general 
public. Having a forward-looking budget forecast provides a 
reasonable understanding of future program and acquisition 
needs and the proportionate resources needed to execute the 
Department's mission of protection and defense of the homeland, 
as well as emergency planning and response.

                Office of the Chief Information Officer

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $243,410,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     327,254,000
House allowance.........................................     210,735,000
Committee recommendation................................     263,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Office of the Chief Information Officer is responsible 
for oversight of information technology [IT] development, 
oversight of IT acquisition, alignment of IT systems and 
infrastructure to the enterprise architecture to support the 
missions and activities of the Department.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $263,000,000, of which 
$115,000,000 is for salaries and expenses, and $148,000,000 is 
to be available through fiscal year 2016 for Department-wide 
technology investments overseen by the Office of the Chief 
Information Officer [OCIO]. The recommendation is $64,254,000 
below the amount requested and $19,590,000 above the amount 
provided in fiscal year 2013. In addition, the Committee 
includes $54,200,000 to complete data center migration in a 
general provision, consistent with prior Appropriations Acts.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                     OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Fiscal year     Fiscal year
                                                                      2013         2014 budget      Committee
                                                                   enacted\1\        request     recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Salaries and expenses..........................................         117,844         117,347          115,000
Information technology services................................          27,564          32,712           31,000
Infrastructure and security activities.........................          55,926         100,063        \2\45,000
Homeland security data network.................................          42,076          77,132           72,000
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
      Total, Office of the Chief Information Officer...........         243,410         327,254       \2\263,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.
\2\$54,200,000 is included in a general provision for data center migration.

                       MULTIYEAR INVESTMENT PLAN

    The Committee includes bill language requiring a multiyear 
investment plan be submitted to the Committees on 
Appropriations with the fiscal year 2015 budget submission to 
Congress. As the OCIO develops the fiscal year 2014 plan, it 
shall take proper stock of all IT investments and identify and 
adopt best practices, such as those identified by GAO in an 
October 2011 report, GAO-12-7, to encourage proper management 
of these investments.

                 INFRASTRUCTURE AND SECURITY ACTIVITIES

    The Committee recommendation includes $45,000,000, for 
development and acquisition of IT equipment, software, 
services, and related activities. The Committee believes the 
OCIO leads and manages efforts vital to the continued 
modernization of the Department's IT infrastructure. 
Additionally, $54,200,000 is provided for data center 
consolidation in a general provision.
    The Committee is pleased with the Department's leadership 
in data center consolidation. The Committee agrees with the 
Department's position that these efforts will lead to 
operational efficiencies, reduced geographic footprint, data 
sharing synergies, reduced energy consumption, and clarity of 
mission throughout the Department. The Department reports that 
investment in data center consolidation of the first 10 data 
centers is already resulting in annual savings of $17,000,000 
and could result in savings of $3,000,000,000 by 2030.

  TRUSTED INTERNET CONNECTIONS/HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

    The Department is directed to provide semiannual briefings 
to the Committee on its progress in developing trusted Internet 
connections and development of Human Resources Information 
Technology.

            SHARING AND SAFEGUARDING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION

    The recommendation includes a $29,868,000 increase to 
implement information sharing and safeguarding measures to 
protect classified national security information. This is 
necessary in order to be compliant with measures resulting from 
Executive Order 13587--Structural Reforms to Improve the 
Security of Classified Networks and the Responsible Sharing and 
Safeguarding of Classified Information. The OCIO is to brief 
the Committee by April 15, 2014, on the implementation 
strategy, development schedule, and milestones for improving 
the protection of national security information held by the 
Department. The Committee also expects any structural reforms 
to be consistent with appropriate protections for privacy and 
civil liberties.

                        Analysis and Operations

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $321,855,000
Budget Estimate, 2014...................................     309,228,000
House allowance.........................................     291,623,000
Committee recommendation................................     303,708,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The account supports activities to improve the analysis and 
sharing of threat information, including activities of the 
Office of Intelligence and Analysis [I&A] and the Office of 
Operations Coordination.

                        COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

    The Committee recommends $303,708,000 for Analysis and 
Operations. This is $5,520,000 below the amount requested and 
$18,147,000 below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. The 
details of these recommendations are included in a classified 
annex accompanying this report.

                   DHS INTELLIGENCE EXPENDITURE PLAN

    The Committee requires the Department's Chief Intelligence 
Officer to submit an expenditure plan for fiscal year 2014 no 
later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this act. The 
plan shall include the following:
  --fiscal year 2014 expenditures and staffing allotted for 
        each program as compared to fiscal years 2012 and 2013;
  --all funded versus on-board positions, including Federal 
        FTE, contractors, and reimbursable and nonreimbursable 
        detailees;
  --a plan, including dates or timeframes for achieving key 
        milestones;
  --allocation of funding within each PPA for individual 
        programs;
  --funding, by object classification, including a comparison 
        to fiscal years 2013 and 2012; and
  --the number of I&A-funded employees supporting organizations 
        outside I&A including those within and outside DHS.
    The expenditure plan shall focus the activities of the 
Office on areas where the Department can provide unique 
expertise or serve intelligence customers who are not supported 
by other components of the Intelligence Community, consistent 
with current statute and Executive orders, and in a way that 
does not impair intelligence support to the senior leadership 
of the Department of Homeland Security.

                     STATE AND LOCAL FUSION CENTERS

    The Committee directs I&A to continue semi-annual briefings 
on the State and Local Fusion Centers program.

                      Office of Inspector General

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\..............................    $121,004,000
Budget Estimate, 2014\2\................................     119,309,000
House allowance\2\......................................     113,903,000
Committee recommendation\2\.............................     117,371,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Excludes $24,000,000 made available by transfer from the FEMA 
Disaster Relief Fund.

    This account finances the Office of Inspector General's 
activities, including audits, inspections, investigations, and 
other reviews of programs and operations of the Department of 
Homeland Security to promote economy, efficiency, and 
effectiveness and to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and 
abuse.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $117,371,000 for the Office of 
Inspector General [OIG], $1,938,000 below the comparable amount 
requested and $3,633,000 below the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013. In addition, the Committee includes bill language 
transferring $24,000,000 needed by the OIG for audits and 
investigations related to natural disasters from the Disaster 
Relief Fund [DRF]. The total funding level provided maintains 
OIG at a current services level including the resources 
requested to complete all 56 mandated 9/11 Act audits of DHS' 
State Homeland Security Program and Urban Area Security 
Initiative grants by the August 20, 2014, deadline. The 
Committee directs the Inspector General to submit a plan for 
expenditure for all funds no later than 30 days after the date 
of enactment of this act. For fiscal year 2015 and thereafter, 
OIG shall submit a detailed expenditure plan within its annual 
budget justification documents. This spend plan shall include 
all DRF transfers (which shall satisfy the requirements for 
notification of DRF transfers under section 503 of this act).

                     DISASTER RECOVERY EXPENDITURES

    The Committee supports the critical role OIG has in 
eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse in disaster assistance 
programs. Further, the Committee notes that it is imperative 
for FEMA to make decisions on recovery assistance in a timely 
fashion, often with limited information in a chaotic post-
disaster environment. However, the Committee is concerned that 
the OIG execution of their role and a lack of clarity and 
consistency in FEMA policy and program execution are adversely 
affecting some Public Assistance applicants. In June 2012, OIG 
recommended that a grantee repay a Federal grant already 
awarded and obligated when it determined that FEMA incorrectly 
applied its regulations and policies for a disaster that 
occurred in June 2008. FEMA argued that deobligation of the 
project was not warranted since the evidence of substantial 
damage as a result of the disaster supported Federal assistance 
for the community's recovery. The unresolved matter was sent to 
the DHS Under Secretary for Management for final adjudication. 
The determination was the grantee did not have to repay the 
Federal grant since disaster damage warranted assistance. The 
Committee is concerned that the OIG Office of Emergency 
Management Oversight focus on ``after the fact'' reviews is not 
efficiently placed to prevent obligation of misused Federal 
funds and therefore causes unnecessary disruption for 
recovering communities by recommending deobligation several 
years afterwards.
    The Committee is mindful that the OIG review of disaster 
obligations is often several years after a disaster and the 
impact of the findings can have a severe effect on a community 
that has already obligated funding to specific projects with 
FEMA's approval in an effort to recover. While it is imperative 
for FEMA policies and rules be transparent; reasonably flexible 
to accommodate various recovery scenarios; and consistently 
applied, where appropriate; the sheer volume of OIG 
recommendations may challenge FEMA's capacity to execute 
meaningful and responsive policy changes. FEMA has concurred 
with a separate OIG finding that the Agency needs a significant 
review and revision of certain policies and methods of 
implementing rules and is currently undergoing a process to do 
so. The Committee expects this process to continue without 
delay. Further, the Committee expects FEMA and the OIG to 
partner fully in this process.
    The Administrator and the Inspector General are directed to 
provide a report to the Committee, no later than 120 days after 
the date of enactment of this act, outlining improvements that 
will be made by both OIG and FEMA to better implement disaster 
recovery programs and guard against waste, fraud, and abuse.

                          INTEGRITY OVERSIGHT

    The Committee remains concerned about the potential for 
increased corruption due to the rapid hiring in CBP and ICE 
since fiscal year 2005. Incidents continue to highlight the 
need for integrity oversight. To avoid corruption and 
misconduct, it is imperative that all officers and agents, 
especially new hires, receive comprehensive training in ethics 
and public integrity. This will be of particular importance 
should any final comprehensive immigration reform legislation 
authorize significant increases in hiring border and 
immigration personnel. The OIG provides ethics training to all 
agencies and is in charge of investigating all allegations of 
criminal misconduct throughout the Department. It is essential 
that the OIG, CBP, and ICE work jointly and cooperatively to 
combat corruption. The Committee has made a deliberate effort 
in the past several appropriations acts to provide additional 
funding specifically for integrity investigations. The 
Committee directs OIG to submit an expenditure plan of 
integrity oversight funds in coordination with CBP and ICE, 
which shall be submitted along with its annual expenditure 
plan. As discussed under the Office of the Secretary and 
Executive Management, the OIG shall work with the Department on 
the integrity aspect of the hiring strategy for implementing 
immigration reform legislation.

                     CONFERENCES AND SPECIAL EVENTS

    The Committee continues the requirement for OIG to report 
to the Committees not later than 30 days after the end of 
fiscal year 2014 on DHS spending on conferences, ceremonies, 
and similar events, based on quarterly reporting to OIG. The 
report shall substantiate DHS compliance with all applicable 
laws and regulations and describe in detail the total costs to 
the Government associated with events. It shall include the 
number of conferences held, the amount of funds obligated, and 
expenses by appropriation or other source of funding, including 
budget accounts and subaccounts used to pay for events.

                              OIG REVIEWS

    The Committee recognizes the importance of a competent and 
active Office of Inspector General to support strong 
congressional oversight and assist departmental leadership. 
Given this imperative, the Committee is concerned about recent 
charges of improper conduct by individuals within the Office of 
Inspector General. In addition, the most recent ``External 
Quality Control Review'' of the DHS OIG Audit Organization, 
issued on June 28, 2012, notes issues with DHS OIG policies, 
procedures, and practices--issues regarding the objectivity, 
credibility, and reliability of auditors' evaluation of 
testimonial evidence; the interference of auditors in 
investigations; and auditors' failure to obtain management 
review and sign-off prior to issuing final reports.
    In the report accompanying the Department of Homeland 
Security Appropriations Act, 2013, GAO was directed to review 
the OIG's functions and operations. The Committee looks forward 
to GAO's review and expects the Inspector General, the 
Secretary, and the Deputy Director of the Office of Management 
and Budget, as the executive chair of the Council of Inspectors 
General, to address, as appropriate, these issues expeditiously 
and refocus the DHS OIG on its important work.

                                 287(g)

    The Department of Homeland Security OIG has conducted an 
annual review of the 287(g) program since fiscal year 2009. 
Since then, the number of OIG recommendations has been reduced 
from 33 in 2009 to two in 2012. Additionally, the nature of the 
287(g) program has changed with the elimination of the Task 
Force model. Therefore, the OIG is directed to complete its 
final report on the 287(g) program and submit it to Congress. 
The Committee encourages the OIG to continue to review the 
implementation of the program as necessary through its annual 
oversight review process and keep the Committee informed of any 
significant changes.

                                TITLE II

               SECURITY, ENFORCEMENT, AND INVESTIGATIONS

                   U.S. Customs and Border Protection

                                SUMMARY

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection is responsible for 
enforcing laws regarding admission of foreign-born persons into 
the United States, and ensuring that all goods and persons 
entering and exiting the United States do so legally.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends total resources of 
$12,423,734,000, including direct appropriations of 
$10,360,011,000 and estimated fee collections of 
$2,063,723,000.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                               U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION--FUNDING SUMMARY
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                           Fiscal year 2014
                                                         Fiscal year 2013       budget            Committee
                                                           enacted\1\\2\      request\3\      recommendations\3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appropriations:
    Salaries and expenses..............................         8,284,074         9,127,088           7,976,142
    Small airport user fee\4\..........................  ................             5,000               5,000
    Automation modernization...........................           718,917           340,105             800,318
    Border Security Fencing, Infrastructure, and                  323,671           351,454             351,454
     Technology [BSFIT]................................
    Air and Marine operations..........................           797,952           427,701             755,819
    Construction and facilities management.............           233,254           471,499             471,278
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Appropriations............................        10,357,868        10,722,847          10,360,011
                                                        ========================================================
Estimated fee collections:
    Immigration inspection user fee....................           568,790           764,267             764,267
    Immigration enforcement fines......................             1,093               773                 773
    ESTA...............................................            46,318            55,168              55,168
    Land border inspection fee.........................            35,935            42,941              42,941
    COBRA fee..........................................           419,352           694,627             694,627
    APHIS inspection fee...............................           329,000           355,216             355,216
    Global entry user fee..............................            13,743            34,835              34,835
    Virgin Island fee..................................  ................            11,302              11,302
    Puerto Rico Trust Fund.............................            96,367            98,602              98,602
    Small airport user fee\4\..........................             8,318  ................  ...................
    Customs Unclaimed Goods............................  ................             5,992               5,992
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Estimated fee collections.................         1,518,916         2,063,723           2,063,723
                                                        ========================================================
      Total, U.S. Customs and Border Protection,               11,876,784        12,786,570          12,423,734
       available funding...............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25 and includes $3,270,000 for
  the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $1,667,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of
  Public Law 113-2).
\3\Includes $3,274,000 for the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
\4\Small airport user fee display reflects changes in Congressional Budget Office scoring.

      

                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\..............................  $8,284,074,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................   9,127,088,000
House allowance.........................................   8,275,983,000
Committee recommendation................................   7,976,142,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $1,667,000 in the Disaster Relief 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

    The U.S. Customs and Border Protection [CBP] Salaries and 
Expenses appropriation provides funds for border security, 
immigration, customs, agricultural inspections, regulating and 
facilitating international trade, collecting import duties, and 
enforcing U.S. trade laws. In addition to directly appropriated 
resources, fee collections are available for the operations of 
CBP from the following sources:
    Immigration Inspection User Fee.--CBP collects user fees to 
fund the costs of international inspections activities at 
airports and seaports, as authorized by the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1356).
    Electronic System for Travel Authorization Fee.--CBP 
collects fees to cover the cost of operating and implementing a 
system to pre-screen visitors from countries participating in 
the Visa Waiver Program prior to their arrival in the United 
States to avoid security risks, as authorized by section 
711(h)(3)(B) of the 9/11 Act (Public Law 110-53).
    Immigration Enforcement Fine.--CBP collects fines from 
owners of transportation lines and persons for unauthorized 
landing of aliens, as authorized by the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1356).
    Land Border Inspection Fee.--CBP collects fees for 
processing applications for the Dedicated Commuter Lanes 
program, the Automated Permit Ports program, the Canadian 
Border Boat Landing program, and both Canadian and Mexican Non-
Resident Alien Border Crossing Cards, as authorized by the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1356).
    Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act [COBRA] 
Fee.--CBP collects fees for inspection services involving 
customs-related functions. The COBRA user fee statutory 
authority (19 U.S.C. 58c) specifies the types of expenses to be 
reimbursed and the order for the reimbursement of these types 
of expenses.
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Inspection 
Fee.--CBP receives as a transfer a distribution of agriculture 
inspection fees collected by the United States Department of 
Agriculture. The user fees, as authorized by the Food, 
Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (21 U.S.C. 
136), are charged to offset costs for the services related to 
the importation, entry, or exportation of animals and animal 
products.
    Global Entry User Fee.--CBP collects fees to cover the cost 
of a registered traveler program to expedite screening and 
processing of international passengers as authorized under the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008, section 565(3)(B).
    U.S. Virgin Islands Fee Fund.--The U.S. Virgin Islands 
[USVI] are an unincorporated territory of the United States and 
although a U.S. territory, the USVI is expressly excluded from 
the definition of customs territory of the United States. The 
importation of goods into the USVI is governed by Virgin 
Islands law. CBP collects duties on behalf of the USVI and 
deposits them into the USVI Fee Fund. The account is now known 
as the U.S. Virgin Islands Fees Fund, in which duties and taxes 
collected in the USVI are deposited. The account in managed 
annually as a reimbursable account with any remaining funds 
remitted back to the USVI at the conclusion of the fiscal year.
    Puerto Rico Trust Fund.--Customs duties, taxes, and fees 
collected in Puerto Rico by CBP are deposited in the Puerto 
Rico Trust Fund. After providing for the expenses of 
administering CBP activities in Puerto Rico, the remaining 
amounts are transferred to the Treasurer of Puerto Rico 
pursuant to 48 U.S.C. sections 740 and 795.
    Small Airport User Fee.--The User Fee Airports Program 
authorized under 19 U.S.C. 58b and administered under 19 U.S.C. 
58c(b)(9)(A)(i), authorizes inspection services to be provided 
to participating small airports on a fully reimbursable basis. 
The fees charged under this program are set forth in a 
memorandum of agreement between the small airport facility and 
the agency, and may be adjusted annually as costs and 
requirements change.
    Unclaimed Goods.--Any goods entered or un-entered 
merchandise (except merchandise under section 557 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1557), but including 
merchandise entered for transportation in bond or for 
exportation) which remain in Customs custody for 6 months from 
the date of importation or a lesser period for special 
merchandise as provided by section 127.28 (c), (d), and (h), 
and without all estimated duties and storage or other charges 
having been paid, shall be considered unclaimed and abandoned. 
This account represents the proceeds from the liquidation of 
that account.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $7,976,142,000 for Salaries and 
Expenses of U.S. Customs and Border Protection for fiscal year 
2014, including $3,274,000 from the Harbor Maintenance Trust 
Fund and, of which $2,237,000,000 is derived from the 
merchandise processing fee. This is $1,150,942,000 below the 
request and $302,932,000 below the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013. More than two-thirds of the reductions in ``Salaries 
and Expenses'' have been moved to other accounts within CBP or 
other DHS agencies.
    The Committee includes bill language making available up to 
$150,000 for payment for rental space for preclearance 
operations and $1,000,000 for payments to informants. The 
Committee also includes bill language placing a $35,000 annual 
limit on overtime paid to any employee and capping official 
reception and representation expenses at $34,425. A new general 
provision is included to allow CBP to access collections 
associated with the U.S.-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement 
Implementation Act, Public Law 112-42.
    The Committee does not include the proposed reduction of 
Border Patrol horse patrols, but includes the other proposed 
reductions including the closing of unnecessary inland Border 
Patrol stations. These resources are more urgently required on 
the border. Due to the need for flexibility in contracting and 
budgeting for information technology and other systems, the 
Committee has moved all funds for information technology as 
well as for Automated Targeting Systems from ``Salaries and 
Expenses'' to ``Automation Modernization'' so that CBP may take 
contracting advantage of the longer availability of these funds 
in the new account. Additionally, air and marine staffing funds 
have been moved from this account to ``Air and Marine 
Operations'', consistent with fiscal year 2013.
    The Committee denies the proposed transfer of US-VISIT to 
CBP for a total of $253,533,000. Instead, the Committee 
recommends continuation of the functional distribution outlined 
in Public Law 113-6. For that reason, the Committee 
recommendation reflects $12,284,000 from US-VISIT funds within 
the Office of Field Operation's Inspections, Trade, and Travel 
Facilitation at Ports of Entry PPA. This amount represents US-
VISIT program management and planning efforts associated with 
entry-exit policy and operations. Further, the Committee 
recommendation reflects an additional $16,741,600 to transfer 
the responsibility for the Arrival Departure Information System 
[ADIS] to CBP. CBP is responsible for policy and operations 
associated with processing legitimate travelers into and out of 
the country. The Committee directs the Department to submit its 
requests for these functions in the format established in 
Public Law 113-6 in its fiscal year 2015 and future requests.
    Increases above the request for travel facilitation are 
discussed later in this report.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                            U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION--SALARIES AND EXPENSES
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Salaries and expenses:
    Headquarters, management, and administration:
        Commissioner......................................            17,392  ................            25,171
        Chief Counsel.....................................            43,021  ................            44,726
        Congressional Affairs.............................             2,595  ................             2,466
        Internal Affairs..................................           153,905  ................           149,061
        Public Affairs....................................            12,546  ................            12,830
        Training and Development..........................            77,618  ................            76,082
        Technology Innovation, Acquisition................            25,970  ................            22,788
        Intelligence/Investigative Liaison................            68,066  ................            60,747
        Administration....................................           414,127  ................           413,473
        Management and administration, border security      ................           620,656  ................
         inspections and trade facilitation...............
        Management and administration, border security,     ................           592,330  ................
         and control between ports of entry...............
        Rent..............................................           564,126           407,898           396,398
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Headquarters, management, and                  1,379,336         1,620,884         1,203,742
           administration.................................
                                                           =====================================================
    Border security inspections and trade facilitation:
        Inspections, trade, and travel facilitation at             2,715,066         2,727,294         2,687,853
         ports of entry...................................
        Harbor maintenance fee collection (Trust Fund)....             3,270             3,274             3,274
        International cargo screening.....................            71,393            72,260            67,461
        Other international programs......................            24,766            24,740            24,596
        Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism [C-               43,012            40,183            38,460
         TPAT]............................................
        Trusted Traveler Programs.........................            10,797             6,311             5,311
        Inspection and detection technology investments...           117,410           112,526           111,504
        Automated targeting systems.......................           113,676           109,944  ................
        National Targeting Center.........................            68,037            65,474            65,106
        Training..........................................            34,800            47,651            39,441
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Border security inspections and trade          3,202,227         3,209,657         3,043,006
           facilitation...................................
                                                           =====================================================
Border security and control between ports of entry:
    Border security and control...........................         3,627,003         3,700,317         3,673,836
    Training..............................................            73,841            55,928            55,558
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Border security and control between ports          3,700,844         3,756,245         3,729,394
       of entry...........................................
                                                           =====================================================
Air and Marine operations.................................  ................           286,769  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
US-VISIT..................................................  ................           253,533  ................
Emergency Appropriations (Public Law 113-2)...............             1,667  ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Salaries and expenses........................         8,284,074         9,127,088         7,976,142
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                           FUNDING PRIORITIES

    As CBP is a ``personnel heavy'' agency, it is 
understandable that difficult choices have to be made when 
developing the budget request in an era of declining resources. 
However, as these choices are made in the short term, we must 
take into account their long-term consequences. Funding 
limitations under the Budget Control Act require this Committee 
to make difficult choices to maintain critical, targeted 
staffing decisions to secure the border while facilitating 
efficient processing of an increasing level of trade and 
travelers to this country. The Committee urges the Department 
and the Office of Management and Budget [OMB] to request 
sufficient resources in the fiscal year 2015 budget to sustain 
critical operations to avoid long-term negative impacts.

                    COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM

    Using the President's budget as a guide, the Committee 
recommends in this bill many border security related items 
which will have an impact on activities in fiscal year 2014 and 
in the years to come. This bill was drafted as a regular 
appropriations bill. It specifically is not attempting to 
predict what activities and programs would be authorized and 
appropriated as part of any final immigration reform 
legislation. This Committee received requests for hiring of 
additional CBP officers in specific locations, deployments of 
specific technology, and new construction at ports of entry, 
among many other items. Many of these are envisioned as part of 
an overall reform bill and were included in S. 744 passed by 
the Senate on June 27, 2013, but are inappropriate to be added 
to this bill at this time. Additionally, total funding 
available to the Committee places certain constraints on the 
Committee. Where feasible, the Committee has included 
recommendations from the President's budget which may begin to 
address some of these requirements until final legislation is 
enacted.

                             FINANCIAL PLAN

    To help facilitate congressional oversight, CBP is directed 
to submit to the Committee within 60 days after the date of 
enactment of this act, a financial plan reflecting a detailed 
breakout of funding by office for each PPA in the ``Salaries 
and Expenses'' appropriation. This financial plan shall include 
a comparison by office to the prior year plan amount and actual 
expenditures for fiscal year 2013 and planned expenditures for 
fiscal year 2014.

              PORT OF ENTRY STAFFING AND RELIANCE ON FEES

    CBP's Office of Field Operations [OFO] operates 329 ports 
of entry [POEs] 24 hours a day and seven days a week, welcoming 
to the U.S. almost 1 million people daily by air, land, and 
sea. In addition to CBP's primary security mission, CBP is the 
second-largest government revenue generator for the U.S., after 
the Internal Revenue Service. On average, OFO collects 
$105,000,000 a day in fees, duties, and tariffs. In fiscal year 
2012, OFO processed $2,300,000,000,000 worth of trade through 
U.S. POEs.
    Travel volume is up 12 percent since fiscal year 2009 and 
is projected to increase 4-5 percent each year for the next 5 
years. In 2012, international travelers from the 10 largest 
countries visiting the U.S. spent more than $107,000,000,000.
    While trade and travel volumes are increasing at dramatic 
rates, OFO funding and staffing have been relatively flat--
contributing to challenges in providing adequate CBP officers 
[CBPO] to meet the demands of increasing workload, expanding 
requirements, and new facilities.
    After having directed CBP for more than 3 years to submit a 
revised workload staffing model, to justify any increased 
staffing requirements, CBP finally submitted to Congress its 
fiscal year 2013 Resource Optimization at Ports of Entry with 
President's budget request. This independently validated report 
identifies the staffing requirement and alternative funding 
strategies to increase revenue sources supporting additional 
staff. The model shows a current need for 1,543 additional 
CBPOs based on fiscal year 2012 volume levels. Also, in joint 
testimony before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on 
Homeland Security on April 17, 2013, CBP officials stated that 
a recent study by the National Center for Risk and Economic 
Analysis of Terrorism Events at the University of Southern 
California ``found that an increase or decrease in staffing at 
ports has an impact on wait times and, therefore, on the U.S. 
economy''. Initial estimates indicate that for every 1,000 
additional CBPOs, the United States can anticipate a 
$2,000,000,000 increase in Gross Domestic Product. Based on the 
continued growth in trade and travel volume, the CBPO need is 
considerably higher.
    OFO's two main user fees--the Immigration User Fee [IUF] 
and the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 
[COBRA] user fees--are also the two main user fees associated 
with CBP inspectional services. These fees do not represent 
full cost recovery for CBP, meaning the cost to perform the 
services for which the fees are charged is more than CBP 
receives in user fee collections. This gap in cost recovery has 
a significant impact since one-third of OFO's budget is 
dependent on user fees. This gap must be filled by increasingly 
scarce directly appropriated dollars.
    Due to the Budget Control Act, direct appropriations for 
most Federal activities are trending downwards. This includes 
appropriations for maintaining existing CBP officers as well as 
hiring additional CBPOs. Therefore, this bill funds a total 
increase of 1,850 CBPOs through a combination of $96,000,000 in 
direct appropriations for a total of 876 CBP officers and an 
additional 974 CBP officers funded through the IUF proposal 
included in the budget request. The Committee expects that the 
positions funded by the Immigration User Fee shall be deployed 
to airports experiencing the greatest level of wait times 
consistent with the congressional justification submitted with 
the President's fiscal year 2015 budget request.

              ANIMAL PLANT AND HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICES

    The Committee notes CBP has been engaged with the 
Department of Agriculture [USDA] Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service [APHIS] to ensure that the APHIS User Fees 
cover the full cost of inspection of agricultural products at 
our ports of entry [POEs]. The Committee strongly encourages 
the Secretary to develop and implement procedures to ensure 
revenue from these fees, transferred to the Department pursuant 
to section 421 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, primarily 
funds the salaries, benefits, overtime, and associated costs of 
CBP Agriculture Specialists. According to a recent briefing by 
CBP, both the House and Senate Agriculture and Appropriations 
Committees, as well as OMB, support the recommendations to 
adjust these fees to more accurately reflect the level of work 
conducted by USDA and CBP personnel. The Committee directs CBP 
to keep it regularly informed as these recommendations are 
implemented.
    The Committee urges CBP to continue to work with APHIS in 
order to facilitate the release of cargo at commercial import 
facilities by ensuring that CBP officials earn Cargo Release 
Authority certification for those species and groups of 
organisms listed in the Cargo Release Authority Plan. Such 
coordination will allow CBP officials to release cargo 
authorized by the Cargo Release Authority Plan while allowing 
APHIS entomologists, plant pathologists, and botanists to make 
release decisions upon discovery of those reportable organisms 
that may pose a threat to the Nation's agricultural security.

                  IMPACT OF FEES ON AIRPORT ACTIVITIES

    To ensure the maximum level of transparency is provided to 
justify these increases, the Committee directs CBP to provide 
an annual electronic report to the general public and 
interested stakeholders, and posted on its Web site, on the 
amount of fee funded activity that occurred over the preceding 
fiscal year at airports. This report shall include all fees, 
such as APHIS, IUF, COBRA, and the Small Airport User Fee. The 
report will also provide annual average wait time data for high 
volume port locations receiving additional IUF fee resources, 
demonstrating a direct connection between service levels and 
resources. It is important for CBP to deploy CBPOs at critical 
international arrivals airports which experience the greatest 
delays and longest processing times.

               INFORMATION SHARING WITH PORT AUTHORITIES

    The Committee notes that it has yet to receive the report 
required in Senate Report 112-169 on the specific steps CBP can 
take to advance its relationship, and specifically its 
information sharing on things such as staffing models and 
constraints, with port authorities. This report should include 
descriptions of high-level stakeholder coordination in the form 
of working groups, conference calls, operations, and other 
interactions. The report shall also address any legal 
impediment CBP has determined prohibits it from providing this 
information to airport authorities and other appropriate 
officials. If there are legal prohibitions, the report shall 
delineate them and provide alternative language and proposals, 
as applicable, to amend the relevant laws. The Committee 
directs CBP to immediately submit this report.

                         LAND BORDER FEE STUDY

    The President's budget request included a new general 
provision authorizing CBP to conduct a study assessing the 
feasibility and cost relating to establishing and collecting a 
new land border crossing fee for both land border pedestrians 
and passenger vehicles along the northern and southern borders. 
This proposal is ill-advised and would have an immediate 
negative impact on border communities and frequent border 
crossers. The Committee has heard strong bipartisan objections 
to its inclusion. CBP officers at our ports of entry are 
trained to provide security of our borders while facilitating 
legitimate travel and trade. They are not toll collectors. A 
general provision has been included in the bill prohibiting CBP 
from conducting any studies for establishing and collecting any 
new land border fee. This provision does not affect any 
existing trusted traveler program such as FAST, NEXUS, SENTRI, 
and the like.

          FACILITATING TRAVEL AND ENHANCING THE ENTRY PROCESS

    CBP and the Vancouver Airport Authority recently launched a 
new program, Automated Passport Control, an expedited customs 
entry process that will allow eligible passengers traveling 
from Vancouver International Airport to the United States to 
clear customs more efficiently, while still ensuring the same 
high standard of safety and security. The Committee notes this 
partnership is the first of its kind and is intended to help 
travelers move more quickly through the CBP preclearance 
inspection process by allowing entry of passport information at 
a self-service kiosk.
    Acting CBP Commissioner, Thomas S. Winkowski, said, 
``Increasing efficiency and streamlining processes are critical 
components of CBP's modernization efforts at ports of entry. 
This will allow for faster processing and increased focus on 
the traveler.'' It is innovative thinking about how CBP can 
improve the traveler experience with this and other programs 
such as Global Entry, that this Committee has strongly 
supported. In order to implement the vision of the President's 
January 19, 2012, Executive order to increase the number of 
international travelers to the United States, programs such as 
this must be expanded.
    The Committee fully funds the $10,800,000 request for the 
CBP mobile program and the $8,000,000 request for integrated 
traveler processing. Additionally, the Committee recommends 
$10,000,000 above the request for targeted traveler enhancement 
programs including, but not limited to, additional mobile 
devices such as Enforcement Link Mobile devices, handheld 
license plate and document readers, additional Global Entry 
kiosks, expanding the integrated traveler process, and 
expanding activities at existing preclearance locations. CBP 
shall focus its efforts to expedite traveler processing at the 
air and land ports of entry with the highest volume of 
passenger traffic. CBP shall brief the Committee no later than 
90 days after the date of enactment of this act on its plan to 
deploy this additional equipment and activity and the potential 
impact it will have on reducing wait times. Additionally, the 
Committee reminds CBP of its April 25, 2012, report to Congress 
entitled ``Improving Entry Process for Visitors to the United 
States'' which stated that CBPOs are the ``first face of the 
U.S. Government that travelers see at POEs. As a visible symbol 
of our Nation, CBP officers have an important responsibility. 
Training provides new CBP officers an understanding of the 
expectations and standards, in terms of conduct, workplace 
environment, demeanor, etiquette, respect for cultural 
diversity, and interpersonal communications.'' The Committee 
directs CBP to maintain these standards as part of its training 
regime and to regularly provide refresher training to all 
CBPOs.

                          CROSS-BORDER TUNNELS

    Tunnels along the United States-Mexico border remain an 
attractive alternative to overland drug smuggling because of 
increased security measures and aggressive enforcement activity 
on traditional cross-border routes. The Committee supports the 
ongoing efforts of the DHS Tunnel Task Force to detect and 
respond to new tunnels, directs continued submission of the 
required tunnel report, and encourages CBP to dedicate 
sufficient resources to continue detecting, responding to, and 
remediating tunnels as they are encountered.

                    CONDUCT AND INTEGRITY OVERSIGHT

    Since Congress initiated the rapid increase in CBP staffing 
in 2005, the Committee has been concerned about the potential 
for increased corruption by CBP personnel. The Committee 
remains committed to addressing this problem. The Committee 
fully funds the request for CBP to continue to expand integrity 
training for its officers, conduct investigations, reduce the 
backlog of reviews and polygraphs, and meet the requirements of 
the Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2011 (Public Law 111-338).
    The Committee directs the Deputy Secretary to continue to 
oversee the coordination of the Office of the Inspector General 
and CBP on program integrity issues.

                          BORDER PATROL AGENTS

    As Secretary Napolitano noted in April 2013, between fiscal 
years 2009 and 2012, DHS seized 39 percent more drugs, 71 
percent more currency, and 189 percent more weapons along the 
Southwest border as compared to fiscal years 2005 through 2008. 
The number of Border Patrol agents has grown from 9,800 in 2001 
to 21,370 today; ICE has deployed a quarter of its personnel to 
the Southwest border since 2009; and CBP has completed 651 
miles of fencing in key areas identified by the Border Patrol. 
CBP has also installed 159 large-scale nonintrusive inspection 
devices and deployed 360 canine teams, increasing those numbers 
from 137 and 341 respectively since 2011.
    While Border Patrol apprehensions slightly increased in 
fiscal year 2012 to 364,678, apprehensions remain at the lowest 
levels since 1974. Funds in this bill maintain an appropriate 
balance of border security which is imperative to maintain as 
the Congress continues to debate immigration reform and its 
component parts regarding border security and interior 
enforcement.
    Included in the amount recommended by the Committee for 
Border Security and Control is a total of $3,729,394,000 for 
hiring, paying, equipping, and training Border Patrol agents. 
Bill language is included mandating a floor of not less than 
21,370 Border Patrol agents on-board throughout fiscal year 
2014. With the funds in this act, there will continue to be 
21,370 Border Patrol agents on duty, more than double the 9,951 
agents on board at the end of fiscal year 2002.

                     NORTHERN BORDER PORT STAFFING

    The Committee remains concerned about CBP officer staffing 
levels for Northern Border ports of entry. The Committee 
believes that many of the concerns about Northern Border 
staffing could be allayed by more complete reporting to 
Congress about CBP's Northern Border staffing plans. The 
Committee directs CBP to submit an updated resource allocation 
model with the fiscal year 2015 budget detailing specific 
staffing and funding for, and implementation of, planned 
Northern Border enforcement initiatives by port of entry. The 
Committee also directs CBP to provide a briefing to the 
Committee not later than December 1, 2013, on the CBP officer 
staffing requirements on the Northern Border based on increased 
trade flows and the current threat environment.

                COORDINATION OF EFFORTS ON INDIAN LANDS

    The Committee notes that the recent GAO report titled 
``Partnership Agreements and Enhanced Oversight Could 
Strengthen Coordination of Efforts on Indian Reservations'' 
suggests that CBP personnel can greatly improve efforts to 
notify tribes of law enforcement activities occurring on 
reservation lands and cultivate a productive partnership with 
border-tribal law enforcement officials. The Committee requests 
a joint briefing from DHS and CBP on the implementation of the 
GAO recommendations.

                    ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS IN THE FIELD

    The Committee encourages CBP and ICE to ensure that any 
jurisdictional disputes with regard to the apprehension of 
undocumented individuals in the field do not hamper the 
Department's overall mission to secure our borders and enforce 
our immigration laws.

                           TRADE ENFORCEMENT

    The Committee fully funds the $3,000,000 budget request to 
further consolidate single transaction bonds [STBs] in order to 
improve duty collection, as recommended by GAO. These funds 
would improve the collection of revenue owed to the Federal 
Government by enabling CBP to develop an automated system for 
STBs. Currently, STBs are submitted and maintained on paper at 
all of the CBP port locations. Automation would allow a 
centralized office to oversee and administer the STB program 
and to develop the necessary expertise to verify the adequacy 
of the STBs.
    CBP analysis has found strong evidence to conclude that 
trade fraud and evasion is widespread in many commodity 
sectors--particularly for goods from China, which account for 
46 percent of the anti-dumping and countervailing duties 
collected. The Committee remains focused on the need for all 
Federal Government agencies involved in international trade to 
aggressively enforce existing trade laws. It has become clear 
that there are specific actions that CBP and ICE, together with 
the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State and the United 
States Trade Representative, can take without the need for 
additional legislation. According to CBP's own statistics, more 
than $1,000,000,000 in duties related to antidumping from 2001 
to 2010 have yet to be collected. To help combat this problem, 
CBP has created a multi-disciplinary Reengineering Dumping 
[RED] Team to review the antidumping and countervailing duty 
[AD/CVD] process and to develop enforcement solutions. To the 
extent these duties are unable to be collected CBP shall issue 
a statement as to the reasons why.
    Additionally, for CBP's AD/CVD enforcement, the Centers of 
Excellence and Expertise [CEEs] also centralize AD/CVD 
functions for the industries and importers covered by the 
respective CEE. The CEEs help increase uniformity and expertise 
across CBP for administration of AD/CVD entries and AD/CVD 
enforcement. The Committee commends CBP for taking these 
actions and directs it to brief the Committees not less than 
twice a year on its efforts to improve the enforcement and 
collection process.

        ANTIDUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTY ENFORCEMENT REPORTS

    The Committee has ensured that, within the amounts provided 
in this account, there will be sufficient funds to administer 
the ongoing requirements of section 754 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675c), referenced in subtitle F of title VII 
of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-171; 120 
Stat. 154).
    The Committee directs CBP to continue to work with the 
Departments of Justice and the Treasury (and all other relevant 
agencies) to increase collections, and provide a public report 
on an annual basis within 30 days of each year's distributions 
under the law. The report should summarize CBP's efforts to 
collect past due amounts and increase current collections, 
particularly with respect to cases involving unfairly traded 
United States imports from China. The report shall provide the 
same level of detail as required under this section in Senate 
Report 112-169.
    The Committee further directs the Secretary to work with 
the Secretary of Commerce to identify opportunities for the 
Department of Commerce to improve the timeliness, accuracy, and 
clarity of liquidation instructions sent to CBP. Increased 
attention and interagency coordination in these areas could 
help ensure that steps in the collection of duties are 
completed in a more expeditious manner. The Secretary is 
directed to report within 180 days after the date of enactment 
of this act on the steps it has taken in conjunction with the 
Department of Commerce to address these issues. Consistent with 
section 691a of Public Law 103-182, the North American Free 
Trade Agreement Implementing Act of 1993, the Committee directs 
the Commissioner of Customs to submit to Congress before the 
60th day of each fiscal year a report regarding the collection 
of duties imposed under the AD/CVD laws during the preceding 
fiscal year.
    Separately, CBP is directed to report to the Committee on 
collection of the outstanding $1,000,000,000 in AD/CVD duties, 
including the number of claims, the value of each claim, the 
stage of collection for each claim and the date on which the 
claim was referred for further action to either the CBP Chief 
Counsel or Department of Justice. This report shall be 
submitted to the Committee not later than 180 days after the 
date of enactment of this act. This report will include the 
steps that have been taken to recover funds and will also 
include the challenges that prevent collection. CBP shall 
publish on its Web site a version of this report that provides 
appropriate privacy and trade sensitivity protections.
    The Committee further directs CBP to provide the Committee 
with a separate report that includes information concerning 
each AD/CVD order for which more than $25,000,000 in assessed 
AD/CVD duties secured by single entry bonds accepted by CBP 
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Sec. 1675(a)(2)(B)(iii) remains 
uncollected more than 2 years after the dates of liquidation of 
the secured entries. This report shall be submitted to the 
Committee not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
of this act. For each relevant AD/CVD order, the report shall 
include the bond's identification number, the date of the entry 
secured by the bond, and the bond's face value. It shall also 
include the liquidation status of each entry, and if 
applicable, the date of liquidation, the amount of bond 
principal received by CBP, the amount of interest received by 
CBP, and the amount of any offer in compromise accepted by CBP. 
Further, the report shall include information about whether CBP 
has demanded performance on the bond or has withdrawn or 
abandoned its demand due to one or more defects in the bond, 
CBP's inability to locate the bond, or expiration of the 
applicable statute of limitations. For each relevant AD/CVD 
order for which CBP has demanded performance on the bond, the 
report shall detail whether CBP's demand for bond performance 
was protested, and if applicable, the date on which the protest 
was filed, whether CBP has issued a decision on the protest, 
whether a subsequent appeal has been filed by the protesting 
party, and if applicable, the status of the appeal including 
whether a court summons has been issued, the date on which the 
summons was issued, and the amount of funds being held by CBP 
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2637(a). The report shall also 
include a detailed strategy, including a specific series of 
actions and corresponding deadlines for completing those 
actions, to collect under the bond the antidumping or 
countervailing duties that remain uncollected.
    The Committee directs CBP, in consultation with the 
Department of Commerce and the Department of Treasury, to 
report to the Committee on how requiring cash deposits of 
estimated AD/CVD during new shipper reviews (in statute) would 
strengthen the administration of the Nation's AD and CVD laws. 
Under current law, the Department of Commerce is required to 
allow importers to bond for cash deposits of estimated AD/CVD 
during new shipper reviews. The Committee urges the United 
States Trade Representative to include in the principal 
negotiating objectives of the United States the objectives of 
preventing evasion of the trade remedy laws of the United 
States through information exchanges and site visits for any 
trade agreements under negotiation as of the date of this 
report or future trade agreement negotiations.

                 TRADE COMPLIANCE--INFORMATION SHARING

    The Committee understands that current law may 
unintentionally prohibit the Department of Commerce from 
sharing proprietary information with CBP vital to determining 
violations or claims with respect to any provision of the 
Tariff Act of 1930. The Committee urges the Department to 
coordinate jointly with the Department of Commerce on a 
legislative proposal to amend the appropriate section of the 
United States Code to remove any legal barriers to the sharing 
of appropriate and necessary information between these prime 
Federal trade compliance and enforcement agencies.

                               JONES ACT

    CBP is charged with enforcement of U.S. cabotage laws. The 
Jones Act provides for the national and economic security of 
the United States by supporting a strong U.S. merchant marine. 
By virtue of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, as amended 
by Public Law 106-580, the coastwise laws apply to marine 
transportation between points and places in the United States, 
including the Outer Continental Shelf. U.S. vessels, mariners, 
and shipyards have been negatively impacted and underutilized 
as a result of lax enforcement and prior rulings inconsistent 
with congressional intent. The Committee urges the Department 
to levy penalties for previously documented violations, 
continue working with the Offshore Marine Service Association 
in order to investigate future potential violations, and 
dedicate adequate resources to vigorously enforce the Jones Act 
on the Outer Continental Shelf. The Committee is very concerned 
that 53 waivers of the Jones Act were issued in fiscal year 
2011, enabling foreign-flagged vessels to transport oil 
released from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in response to 
extreme fluctuations in the price of gas.
    The Committee is also concerned about the lack of 
transparency in issuing these waivers. A general provision is 
included prohibiting funds from being used to issue future 
waivers related to a release from the Strategic Petroleum 
Reserve until the Secretary has consulted with the Departments 
of Energy and Transportation and representatives of the United 
States flag maritime industry and taken adequate steps to 
ensure the use of United States flag vessels. The Secretary 
shall notify the Congress within 2 business days of any request 
for a waiver, not solely waivers requested to transport oil 
released from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
    The Committee directs CBP to develop a system to track the 
status of all Jones Act violations, from the time they are 
reported until assessed penalties have been collected or there 
is a finding of no violation and the charges are dismissed. The 
Committee also directs CBP to make information available to the 
public and the Committees, on a quarterly basis, about specific 
Jones Act violations, findings of fact, parties determined to 
be at fault, amount of penalty assessments, and status of 
collections.

                      NORTHERN BORDER COOPERATION

    The Committee recognizes the economic importance of 
facilitating the flow of cross border goods and people between 
the United States and Canada. To this end, the Joint United 
States-Canada ``Beyond the Border'' Action Plan, issued April 
4, 2011, included several recommendations to enhance the 
economic relationship while increasing cross border security. 
On June 17, 2013, a cargo truck pre-inspection pilot began at 
the Pacific Highway crossing adjacent to Surrey, British 
Colombia across the border from Blaine, Washington. This 
project is a collaborative effort by CBP, Canada Border 
Services Agency [CBSA], and Public Safety Canada under the 
``Beyond the Border'' plan. Phase I of this pilot is designed 
as a ``proof of concept'' to determine the viability of 
assigning CBP officers to Canadian border crossings to pre-
inspect southbound trucks, drivers, and cargo prior to arrival 
into the United States. It will also test the viability of 
developed technologies and joint U.S.-Canada procedures to 
conduct CBP primary truck processing in Canada. CBP will 
monitor wait times and provide traffic mitigation as needed. 
This pilot may prove that other innovative initiatives can be 
undertaken on our northern and southern borders to enhance 
security and facilitate legitimate trade.
    Only July 2, 2013, CBP announced it was beginning Phase II 
of the pilot--implementation of the Entry/Exit information 
system. Under Phase II, DHS and the CBSA will expand the 
exchange of biographic entry data collected on third-country 
nationals (those who are neither citizens of Canada nor of the 
United States), permanent residents of Canada who are not U.S. 
citizens, and lawful permanent residents of the United States 
who are not Canadian citizens, to all automated land ports of 
entry at the common border, including all major land border 
crossings. It is expected that a coordinated Entry/Exit 
information system will facilitate exchanges of entry 
information such that an entry into country becomes an exit 
from the other. If the pilot operates as planned it will help 
the United States and Canada identify persons who potentially 
overstay their lawful period of admission; better monitor the 
departure of persons subject to removal orders; and verify that 
residency requirements are being met by applicants for 
continued eligibility in immigration programs.
    Additionally, on June 26, 2013, a joint United States-
Canadian progress report was released entitled ``Facilitating 
the Conduct of Cross-Border Business.'' This report, which is a 
deliverable of the Beyond the Border Action Plan, describes 
bilateral efforts to ensure business travelers benefit from 
more efficient and predictable border clearance processes. The 
Committee directs CBP to provide a briefing on both of the 
pilots and the cross-border business plan not later than 60 
days after the date of enactment of this act.

                        ADVANCED TRAINING CENTER

    CBP has one of the Nation's largest cadres of armed Federal 
law enforcement personnel and having a full-scale advanced 
training facility focused on the agency's specialized missions 
is critical. Included in the amount recommended by the 
Committee is $40,000,000, as proposed in the budget, for 
programmatic expenses (including salaries and benefits) and the 
National Training Plan at the Advanced Training Center [ATC]. 
The ATC is providing advanced firearms, tactical, and 
leadership training to CBP officers and agents across the 
country, as well as other Federal and law enforcement agencies. 
With the establishment of the Advanced Training Center 
Revolving Fund [ATCRF], pursuant to the fiscal year 2012 
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, the 
Committee directs CBP to continue to utilize ATCRF funds in 
addition to any funds appropriated annually by the Congress.
    Pursuant to Public Law 106-246, the training to be 
conducted at the Center shall be configured in a manner so as 
to not duplicate or displace any Federal law enforcement 
program of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center [FLETC]. 
Training currently being conducted at a FLETC facility shall 
not be moved to the Center.

                  TRAINING REGARDING HUMAN TRAFFICKING

    CBP plays a critical role in identifying potential human 
trafficking victims as they enter the United States. The 
Committee encourages CBP to continue to work with appropriate 
nonprofit organizations and victim service providers to improve 
the training of CBP officers in the field to assist in the 
identification of human trafficking victims, especially 
children, and provide appropriate referrals to victim service 
organizations. Further, the Committee encourages the 
Commissioner to post the National Human Trafficking Resource 
Center hotline, email address, and Web site information in all 
U.S. ports of entry.

                     FOREIGN MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE

    The Committee recognizes that trucks carrying foreign 
municipal solid waste entering the United States from Canada 
represent potential homeland security and environmental threats 
to our Nation. The Committee is also aware of successful 
efforts to address this threat, which have resulted in a 
significant reduction in municipally managed waste shipments to 
the United States. However, nearly 350 trash trucks still cross 
U.S. borders every day. The Committee urges DHS, in conjunction 
with CBP, to work with the Finance Committee--the appropriate 
authorizing committee--to consider proposing to raise the 
current Customs User Fee for trucks carrying foreign municipal 
solid waste into the United States and include any such 
proposal in the fiscal year 2015 budget through the appropriate 
authorizing mechanism.

                        AUTOMATION MODERNIZATION

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $718,917,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     340,105,000
House allowance.........................................     700,242,000
Committee recommendation................................     800,318,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The automation modernization account includes funds for 
major information technology systems and services for U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection [CBP], including the Automated 
Commercial Environment [ACE] and the International Trade and 
Data System projects, and connectivity of and integration of 
existing systems.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $800,318,000, to be available 
until September 30, 2016, for automation modernization. This is 
$460,213,000 above the amount requested and $81,401,000 above 
the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. Included in the amount 
recommended by the Committee is $899,300 for 5 technical FTE in 
support of the movement of ADIS from US-VISIT/OBIM to CBP.
    The Committee also has transferred the Automated Targeting 
Systems funding from ``Salaries and Expenses'' to ``Automation 
Modernization'' in a separate PPA.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                            AUTOMATION MODERNIZATION
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information technology....................................           393,820  ................           349,450
Automated Targeting Systems...............................  ................  ................           109,932
Automated Commercial Environment/International Trade Data            138,611           140,830           140,762
 System [ITDS]............................................
Current operations protection and processing support                 186,486           199,275           200,174
 [COPPS]..................................................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Automation modernization.....................           718,917           340,105           800,318
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                         REPORTS AND BRIEFINGS

    The Committee expects to continue receiving the ACE 
quarterly reports. CBP is directed to brief the Committees 
immediately on the plan to decommission the Automated 
Commercial System [ACS], the updated program plan for ACE, how 
the ACS decommission plan is integrated into the program plan, 
and the updated master schedule for ACE development.

                           TECS MODERNIZATION

    The Committee directs CBP and ICE to continue to conduct 
the semiannual joint briefings for the Committee.

        BORDER SECURITY FENCING, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND TECHNOLOGY

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $323,671,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     351,454,000
House allowance.........................................     361,454,000
Committee recommendation................................     351,454,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Border Security, Fencing, Infrastructure, and 
Technology account funds the capital procurement and total 
operations and maintenance costs associated with fencing, 
infrastructure, sensors, surveillance, and other border 
security technology.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $351,454,000 for Border Security 
Fencing, Infrastructure, and Technology, the same as the 
request, and $27,783,000 above the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                             BORDER SECURITY FENCING, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND TECHNOLOGY
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Development and deployment................................           188,567           160,435           160,435
Operations and maintenance................................           135,104           191,019           191,019
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Border security fencing, infrastructure, and            323,671           351,454          351,454
       technology.........................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                      TECHNOLOGY DEPLOYMENT DELAYS

    According to the Department, Border Patrol apprehensions 
have decreased 50 percent since fiscal year 2008. In the Tucson 
sector apprehensions dropped 44 percent between fiscal years 
2010-2012. This is the lowest level of apprehensions in Tucson 
in 18 years. Since fiscal year 2005, the Committee has been a 
strong and active supporter of the efforts to secure our 
Southwest border through a strategic combination of fencing, 
tactical infrastructure, and technology, combined with a 
doubling of the size of the Border Patrol. In fact, at the 
initiation of this Committee, Congress has appropriated more 
than $2,400,000,000 in regular, supplemental, and emergency 
funding above the amounts requested by this and the previous 
President for this account. These funds have been used to 
construct the 651 miles of fencing and border infrastructure 
mandated by the Secure Fence Act, as amended, and they have 
been used to bring more technology and security to Border 
Patrol agents than has ever been available.
    On April 6, 2012, the Department issued a request for 
proposals to build and deploy the next set of integrated fixed 
towers [IFTs] for cameras and radars within Arizona. CBP 
initially estimated that the contract would be awarded in the 
first quarter of 2013 and it still intends to initiate the 
deployments in Douglas and Casa Grande, Arizona. Operational 
field testing on the numerous bids CBP received is ongoing as 
of June 2013, but the contract award has slipped yet again--to 
the first quarter of fiscal year 2014 and deliveries of the 
IFTs are now anticipated to start by fiscal year 2015. While 
the Committee is encouraged that there appears to be proper 
oversight of contracts and that contractors are being held to 
fulfilling their obligations for use of taxpayer dollars, this 
program has now been delayed for over 2 years. Additionally, 
the Committee is concerned about concurrent deployment of these 
systems before it has been proven that they actually work in 
real-life situations and has included language prohibiting 
concurrent deployment of IFTs. The Department has indicated 
that approximately $580,000,000 remains available in 
unobligated prior year balances for border technology as of 
June 1, 2013. Given these strong concerns, the Committee 
rescinds $61,783,000 in unobligated balances from this account 
that are not required for fiscal year 2014.

                            NORTHERN BORDER

    Included in the Committee's recommendation is $10,000,000, 
as requested, for enhancing low-flying aircraft surveillance 
and maritime detection technology along the Northern Border.
    The Committee recognizes that incidents of drug smuggling 
along our Northern Border are increasing, and that more efforts 
need to be undertaken to address this growing problem. In 
previous years, DHS and the Department of Defense cooperated on 
Operation Outlook, a program that used sophisticated military 
radar technology along the Northern Border to identify low-
flying aircraft that would otherwise not have been caught with 
the current technology used by DHS. Though that operation was 
highly successful, it was only temporary in nature and covered 
only one sector of the Northern Border. To better uncover and 
combat the smuggling of drugs by low-flying aircraft in the 
future, and to assist in developing a comprehensive plan to 
combat narcotics smuggling along the Northern Border, the 
Committee urges the Department, through partnerships between 
CBP and the Department of Defense, to use military radar 
technologies to the fullest extent possible along the Northern 
Border.

                           TETHERED AREOSTATS

    The budget proposes to transfer operation and ownership of 
8 existing tethered aerostat systems [TARS] from the Department 
of Defense to DHS and the Committee approved their transfer 
effective on July 1, 2013. These blimp-mounted radars allow DHS 
to identify low-flying aircraft in the border region, and have 
proven to be a cost-effective and worthwhile way to monitor the 
border. The Committee recommends $37,400,000 for this activity, 
as requested. The Committee understands CBP is studying whether 
it needs to restore the Puerto Rico TARS and, if so, at what 
cost. CBP has also indicated that it is evaluating how to 
utilize TARS best, which could be a different configuration 
than is currently deployed. CBP is to brief the Committee on 
its plans no later than September 13, 2013.

                              BORDER ROADS

    The Committee directs CBP to work with counties along the 
United States-Mexico border to identify unimproved county roads 
that the Border Patrol requires the use of and that provide 
critical access to the border region for the purpose of 
maintaining border security. The Committee directs CBP to 
provide a briefing on the extent to which these roads are used, 
their impact on daily border security operations, and the 
feasibility of incorporating the maintenance and repair of any 
identified high-priority access roads into its Tactical 
Infrastructure Maintenance and Repair program not later than 90 
days after the date of enactment of this act.

                            INVASIVE SPECIES

    The Committee is pleased with the continued progress CBP 
has made, in partnership with the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, on controlling carrizo cane, an invasive species 
along the lower Rio Grande. As the carrizo cane program 
progresses towards eventual sustainment, the Committee directs 
CBP, with its partners, to provide an updated briefing on the 
efforts, including using biological control projects, on salt 
cedar.

                       AIR AND MARINE OPERATIONS

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $797,952,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     427,701,000
House allowance.........................................     802,741,000
Committee recommendation................................     755,819,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The U.S. Customs and Border Protection [CBP] Air and Marine 
Operations [AMO] account funds the capital procurement and 
total operations and maintenance costs of the CBP air and 
marine program and provides support to other Federal, State, 
and local agencies.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $755,819,000 for Air and Marine 
Operations, of which $472,501,000 is to remain available until 
September 30, 2015. This is an increase of $328,118,000 above 
the request and $42,133,000 below the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                            AIR AND MARINE OPERATIONS
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Salaries and expenses.....................................           283,196  ................           283,318
Operations and maintenance................................           396,875           353,751           381,251
Procurement...............................................           117,881            73,950            91,250
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Air and Marine interdiction, operations,                797,952           427,701           755,819
       maintenance, and procurement.......................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

    The Committee strongly supports CBP's continued efforts to 
recapitalize its air and marine assets. Working with the Office 
of Air and Marine, the Committee has provided resources to meet 
the Department's border security requirements in the air, 
coastal, and riverine environments as delineated by the CBP Air 
and Marine Recapitalization Plan. Resources to address some of 
these requirements are provided in this bill. The Committee 
notes the lengthy period of time it takes to procure certain 
types of aircraft and other air systems because the bulk of the 
systems are being acquired by the Department of Defense [DOD] 
and CBP is fitting into DOD's production lines. At the same 
time, these are mobile border security assets, able to be 
transferred rapidly to respond to actual and emerging threats.

   AGING AVIATION ASSETS AND STRATEGIC RECAPITALIZATION REQUIREMENTS

    The President's budget proposes an unacceptably steep, 37 
percent cut to the aviation procurement budget and an 11 
percent reduction to operations and maintenance compared to the 
fiscal year 2013 enacted level. CBP's fleet of aircraft is 
increasingly aged. More planes are being retired than are being 
replaced at a time when there is an increased demand for their 
use in the counterdrug, alien smuggling, and disaster response 
missions. More than 50 percent of the aircraft are 35 years old 
on average. The proposed reduction would result in fewer 
replacement aircraft being purchased and combined aircraft 
flight hours being cut to only an estimated 62,386 flight hours 
for this vital mission--a cut of more than 40 percent from the 
peak level of 106,600 hours in fiscal year 2010, and a 
reduction of over 20 percent from flight hour allocations for 
fiscal year 2012.
    The Committee recognizes that since the merger of the 
legacy U.S. Border Patrol and U.S. Customs Service aviation 
programs under CBP in 2005, the CBP's Office of Air and Marine 
has dramatically increased the efficiency and effectiveness of 
CBP air operations in support of the Department and its 
international, Federal, State, local, and tribal partners. Many 
of these efficiencies were captured through the acquisition of 
technologies that then drove or facilitated changes in CBP air 
operations including decreased operations cycle time, effective 
asset procurement/modernization, and innovative sensor system 
integration. These operational developments have then resulted 
in expanded mission functionality, vastly improved detection 
capability, real-time customer support, decreased mishaps and 
system downtime, which have consequently provided a significant 
increase in overall CBP aviation mission effectiveness. The 
Committee understands that the aircraft recapitalization plan 
is nearly complete, with more than $1,000,000,000 appropriated 
by Congress from fiscal year 2006 through fiscal year 2013 to 
accomplish the objectives laid out in the long-range plan to 
replace/upgrade CBP's aging fleet of aircraft and marine 
vessels.
    The budget request includes funding to continue the P-3 
aircraft service life extension effort, to purchase two 
additional multirole enforcement aircraft [MEAs], a number of 
marine vessels, and additional sensor upgrades. But at this 
reduced level of procurement funding, it will take over 13 
years to fully recapitalize CBP's fleet. For instance, the MEA 
provides border protection, law enforcement, and rapid response 
contingency deployment capabilities. Since 2009, DHS has 
budgeted for eight MEA systems, which does not support the most 
efficient production line. The Committee encourages the 
Department to work with industry to develop a procurement 
strategy to obtain a more robust production rate and to explore 
the cost savings of replacing its aging legacy fleet. As these 
air assets are fully mobile, they are capable of rapidly 
responding to an emerging threat anywhere in the country.
    To address the requirement to replace aging aircraft and 
enhance the capabilities of existing systems, the Committee 
fully funds the request and recommends the following increases 
above the request:
  --$17,300,000 to procure two additional VADER radar systems, 
        and
  --$27,500,000 above the request to restore total AMO flight 
        hours for all aircraft to approximately 84,000 hours.
    These increases will provide crucial aerial support and 
slow the steady decline in flight hours in support of the 
Border Patrol mission over the past 5 years.

                 CONSTRUCTION AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $233,254,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     471,499,000
House allowance.........................................     471,278,000
Committee recommendation................................     471,278,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    This appropriation provides funding to plan, construct, 
renovate, equip, and maintain buildings and facilities 
necessary for the administration and enforcement of the laws 
relating to immigration, customs, and alien registration.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $471,278,000, for construction and 
facilities management activities of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection [CBP], to remain available until September 30, 2018. 
This is $221,000 below the amount requested and $238,024,000 
above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                     CONSTRUCTION AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Fiscal year
                                                             2013 enacted\1\  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                                               budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facility construction and sustainment......................          175,981          385,398           385,398
Program oversight and management...........................           57,273           86,101            85,880
                                                            ----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Construction and facilities management........          233,254          471,499           471,278
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                ADDITIONAL LAND BORDER PORT REQUIREMENTS

    The Committee notes that the American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act of 2009, (Public Law 111-5) provided 
$420,000,000 for construction, repairs, maintenance, and 
security upgrades to CBP-owned ports of entry [POEs]. Of the 
167 land border ports of entry, CBP owns 41. The rest are owned 
and administered by the General Services Administration [GSA] 
or are privately owned and leased, and one is owned by the 
National Park Service. The Committee is pleased that through 
good stewardship and creative contract management, CBP was able 
to reconstruct or renovate 31 CBP-owned ports of entry, 28 of 
which were on the Northern Border.
    Previously, the Committee directed DHS, GSA, and the Office 
of Management and Budget to develop a multiyear strategy to 
address the growth of trade and passenger processing at our 
land POEs with maintaining security. In response, the 
President's budget proposes to transfer from GSA to CBP--via a 
delegation of authority--the operation, maintenance, and repair 
of LPOEs. GSA retains the authority over major construction 
(including funding, contracting, and oversight). The Committee 
supports this recommendation and fully funds the request. Not 
later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this act, 
CBP and GSA jointly shall brief the Committee on implementation 
of the delegation of authority.
    Additionally, the Committee notes its continued interest in 
CBP exploring alternate options for funding POE construction 
and improvements, including expanded use of public-private 
partnerships, and was pleased to see such a proposal included 
in the President's budget request. The Committee includes a 
modified version of this proposal as a general provision in 
Title V.

                      FIVE-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN

    The Committee reminds CBP that the fiscal year 2012 
Department of Homeland Security Act made permanent the 
requirement that a 5-year plan for all Federal land border 
ports of entry shall be submitted annually with the President's 
budget request. The Committee directs the Department to 
continue to work with the GSA on its nationwide strategy to 
prioritize and address the infrastructure needs at land border 
POEs and to comply with the requirements of the Public 
Buildings Act of 1959 (40 U.S.C. 3301) and seek necessary 
funding.
    The Committee further directs the Department to encourage 
the use of small businesses in all phases of the contracting 
process for construction and renovation of POEs.

                U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

                                SUMMARY

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] is 
responsible for enforcing immigration and customs laws and 
detaining and removing deportable or inadmissible aliens.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends total resources of $5,398,845,000, 
including direct appropriations of $5,053,845,000, and 
estimated fee collections of $345,000,000.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                            U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT--FUNDING SUMMARY
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                                 enacted       budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appropriations:
    Salaries and expenses\1\\2\...........................         5,388,138         4,956,822         5,013,945
    Automation modernization..............................            33,456            34,900            34,900
    Construction..........................................             4,993             5,000             5,000
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Appropriations...............................         5,426,587         4,996,722         5,053,845
                                                           =====================================================
Estimated Fee Collections:
    Immigration inspection user fee.......................           116,869           135,000           135,000
    Breached bond/detention fund..........................            75,000            65,000            65,000
    Student exchange and visitor fee......................           120,000           145,000           145,000
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Estimated fee collections....................           311,869           345,000           345,000
                                                           =====================================================
      Total, Available funding............................         5,738,456         5,341,722         5,398,845
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $855,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public
  Law 113-2).

                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\..............................  $5,388,138,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................   4,956,822,000
House allowance.........................................   5,344,461,000
Committee recommendation................................   5,013,945,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $855,000 in the Disaster Relief 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

    The ICE Salaries and Expenses account provides funds for 
the enforcement of immigration and customs laws, intelligence, 
and detention and removals. In addition to directly 
appropriated resources, funding is derived from the following 
offsetting collections:
    Immigration Inspection User Fee.--ICE derives funds from 
user fees to support the costs of detention and removals in 
connection with international inspections activities at 
airports and seaports, as authorized by the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1356).
    Student Exchange Visitor Program Fee.--ICE collects fees 
from foreign students, exchange visitors, and schools and 
universities to certify and monitor participating schools, and 
to conduct compliance audits.
    Immigration Breached Bond/Detention Fund.--ICE derives 
funds from the recovery of breached cash and surety bonds in 
excess of $8,000,000 as authorized by the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1356); and from a portion of fees 
charged under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act to support the cost of the detention of aliens.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $5,013,945,000, for Salaries and 
Expenses of ICE for fiscal year 2014. This is $57,123,000 above 
the request and $374,193,000 below the amount provided in 
fiscal year 2013. The Committee includes bill language placing 
a $35,000 limit on overtime paid to any employee; making up to 
$10,000,000 available for special operations; making up to 
$2,000,000 available for the payment of informants; making up 
to $11,216,000 available to reimburse other Federal agencies 
for the costs associated with the care, maintenance, and 
repatriation of smuggled illegal aliens; making not less than 
$305,000 available for promotion of public awareness of the 
child pornography tipline and anti-child exploitation 
activities; making not less than $5,400,000 available to 
facilitate agreements consistent with section 287(g) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act; limiting the use of funds for 
facilitating agreements consistent with section 287(g) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act to the same activities funded 
in fiscal year 2005; making $15,770,000 available for 
activities to enforce laws against forced child labor, of which 
$6,000,000 shall remain available until expended; making up to 
$11,475 available for official reception and representation 
expenses; and making $10,300,000 available until September 30, 
2015, for the Visa Security Program.
    The Committee recognizes that ICE has had to make difficult 
budget savings and downward adjustments to its base funding. 
While certain targeted increases supported by this legislation 
are proposed, ICE is on the verge of being forced to cut into 
the bone of critical operations, especially investigations and 
technology. This path is not sustainable and the Office of 
Management and Budget must ensure that sufficient resources are 
proposed in the President's fiscal year 2015 budget address 
these national security requirements.
    As discussed in greater detail below, the Committee 
recommends increases for domestic investigations, detention 
beds, alternatives to detention, and the criminal alien 
program.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                         U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT--SALARIES AND EXPENSES
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Fiscal year
                                                             2013 enacted\1\  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                                               budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Headquarters, management, and administration:
    Personnel compensation and benefits, services, and               219,754          192,236           189,909
     other costs...........................................
    Headquarters-managed IT investment.....................          160,252          141,294           140,808
                                                            ----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Headquarters, management, and                        380,006          333,530           330,717
       administration......................................
                                                            ====================================================
Legal proceedings..........................................          206,768          204,651           202,584
                                                            ====================================================
Investigations:
    Domestic investigations................................        1,684,633        1,599,972         1,603,888
    International operations...............................          114,970          100,544            99,741
    Visa Security Program..................................           34,515           31,630            31,541
                                                            ----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Investigations.............................        1,834,118        1,732,146         1,735,170
                                                            ====================================================
Intelligence...............................................           78,348           75,448            74,908
                                                            ====================================================
Detention and removal operations:
    Custody operations.....................................        2,022,344        1,844,802         1,879,239
    Fugitive operations....................................          145,133          125,771           124,802
    Criminal Alien Program.................................          216,224          291,721           294,155
    Alternatives to detention..............................           96,430           72,435            96,181
    Transportation and Removal Program.....................          269,845          255,984           255,925
                                                            ----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Detention and removal operations...........        2,749,976        2,590,713         2,650,302
                                                            ====================================================
Secure Communities.........................................          138,067           20,334            20,264
Emergency Appropriation (Public Law 113-2).................              855  ................  ................
                                                            ====================================================
      Total, Salaries and expenses.........................        5,388,138        4,956,822         5,013,945
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                    TRADE COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT

    The Committee notes that Intellectual Property Rights [IPR] 
violations is a significant revenue source for transnational 
criminal organizations including Mexican drug cartels. 
According to officials at the IPR Coordination Center, these 
violations are a low-risk/high-profit type of crime. The Center 
sees more organized crime groups engaging in these types of 
illegal activities because of the high-dollar value to them.
    The Committee fully funds the request for trade enforcement 
activities, including the $5,600,000 increase proposed in the 
budget to support intellectual property rights and commercial 
trade fraud investigations, including undercover equipment, 
translation and transcription of court-ordered wiretaps, 
commercial fraud training, and outreach at the IPR Center. The 
Committee urges ICE to prioritize investigations involving 
illicit trade of dangerous goods that could be harmful to the 
public, including counterfeit pharmaceuticals and tainted good.

                             INVESTIGATIONS

    The Committee supports the proposed $8,800,000 increase for 
human smuggling investigations conducted by ICE through a 
variety of strike forces and teams both domestically and abroad 
and recommends an additional $10,000,000 for priority 
investigations into human smuggling and trafficking, 
counterproliferation, anti-gang, and drug smuggling 
investigations. ICE shall submit an expenditure plan breaking 
out how it proposes to allocate all resources provided in this 
act for domestic investigations not later than 90 days after 
the date of enactment of this act. This plan shall detail both 
financial resources as well as the personnel dedicated to each 
mission area and shall be at the same level of detail as the 
quarterly investigations activities report.
    ICE also is directed to maintain its relationship with the 
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in regards 
to its ongoing support for investigations and other child 
exploitation activities.
    Additionally, the Committee supports the work of the 
National Gang Unit and encourages the Department and ICE to 
continue these aggressive investigations, specifically of gangs 
of national significance which are perpetuating much of the 
violence in our major urban areas while also engaging in a 
variety of illicit activity including international drug, gun, 
and human trafficking.

                     LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER

    The Committee provides funding of $34,400,000, $5,000,000 
above the request and $5,000,000 above the amount provided in 
fiscal year 2013. The Law Enforcement Support Center [LESC] is 
DHS' national center which provides information about criminal 
aliens and absconders to the law enforcement community, 
responding to over 1.3 million Immigration Alien Queries 
annually, and provides critical support to ICE field offices in 
connection with single or large scale enforcement efforts. The 
LESC is also an important component of Secure Communities, 
which was fully deployed to 3,181 jurisdictions across the 
United States in fiscal year 2013, with the LESC serving as the 
single point of contact for Secure Communities-related queries.
    The Committee notes that the LESC and the Fugitive 
Operations Support Center [FOSC] play critical roles supporting 
local law enforcement officials while performing law 
enforcement actions in the field, as well as conducting 
analyses about the status and location of fugitive aliens. The 
Committee understands that both the LESC and the FOSC are 
playing important and growing roles in analysis of visa 
overstays. ICE's Compliance Enforcement Unit is responsible for 
the initial review of all overstay records segregating them 
based on enforcement priorities and those in priority 10 are 
referred to the FOSC for analysis. FOSC analysis includes 
running the referred individuals against a variety of public 
and law enforcement databases. The FOSC is responsible for 
analyzing the backlog of visa overstays about which little is 
known, in part through matching biographic information, and if 
available, biometric. Given the importance of resolving visa 
overstays, the Committee strongly encourages FOSC to coordinate 
its activities regarding biometrics with the Office of 
Biometric Identity Management [OBIM] and the FBI, especially 
ensuring that records that are passed to FOSC for analysis 
include either the biometric or the fingerprint identification 
number from OBIM in order to speed information sharing with the 
FBI. The Committee directs ICE to brief the Committee within 90 
days after the date of enactment of this act on the support the 
LESC and FOSC provide to ICE in regard to visa overstay 
analysis, including its coordination with other agencies and 
the resources and staffing supporting this effort.
    The Committee recommends $34,400,000, $5,000,000 above the 
request, so that LESC can adequately support the full 
deployment of Secure Communities with the necessary full-time 
law enforcement personnel and related resources. Within the 
increased funds provided, ICE is encouraged to evaluate the 
need for additional resources such as improved data transfer 
capabilities for FOSC's role in visa overstay analysis. 
Further, in order to promote efficiency, the Committee 
recommends that ICE take steps to ensure that current 
operations being carried out at the LESC remain centralized at 
the LESC facility and are not unnecessarily duplicated in other 
parts of the country.

                    ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS IN THE FIELD

    The Committee encourages ICE and CBP to ensure that any 
jurisdictional disputes with regard to the apprehension of 
undocumented individuals in the field do not hamper the 
Department's overall mission to secure our borders and enforce 
our immigration laws.

                         VISA SECURITY PROGRAM

    The Committee recommends $31,541,000, as requested, to 
fully fund visa security programs and activities. Of the total 
amount provided for the Visa Security Program, bill language is 
included making $10,300,000 available for obligation through 
September 30, 2015.

                        IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT

    The role of the Appropriations Committee is to provide the 
resources necessary to enforce enacted laws and Administration 
policy. The Committee takes seriously its role with regard to 
providing sufficient resources within constrained budgets to 
effectively and efficiently enforce immigration laws.
    Maintaining an adequate number of detention beds is 
critical to ensuring the integrity of our entire immigration 
enforcement system, including border enforcement, while at the 
same time preventing a return to the ill-advised ``catch and 
release'' policy. In fiscal year 2012, ICE removed a total of 
409,849 aliens, including 225,390 convicted criminal aliens, 
compared with 240,665 removed in fiscal year 2004. At the end 
of the first quarter of the current fiscal year, ICE had 
removed 86,861 aliens, including 46,989 convicted criminals. It 
is imperative that sufficient detention bed space be maintained 
so that aliens who pose the greatest threat to the community or 
who are required by current law to be detained can be. The 
Committee notes that the number of aliens in detention has 
spiked at certain periods during the fiscal year. Current law 
requires mandatory detention of individuals entering this 
country claiming credible fear of persecution in their home 
countries and the numbers of apprehended aliens making these 
claims in locations such as the Rio Grande Valley sector have 
skyrocketed. For instance, during the week ending May 24, 2013, 
there were 39,088 aliens in detention beds nationwide, but this 
figure has dropped to 32,657 as of June 28, 2013. It is 
incumbent on ICE to manage its detention bed resources to 
ensure there are sufficient detention beds. The Committee 
directs ICE to take appropriate measures to reduce the daily 
bed rate charged to the Federal Government through a 
competitive process in contracting for or otherwise obtaining 
detention beds while ensuring that the most recent applicable 
detention standards, including health standards, are met.
    Recognizing the funds requested in the budget are 
insufficient to support the requested bed level, the Committee 
recommends $1,879,239,000, $41,000,000 above the amount 
requested, for a minimum of 31,800 detention beds, as 
requested. Bill language is also included permitting the 
Secretary to propose to reprogram funds necessary to ensure the 
detention of aliens prioritized for removal, subject to the 
reprogramming guidelines contained in section 503.

                      DETENTION OF PREGNANT WOMEN

    The Performance-Based National Detention Standards 2011 
Section 2.15 Use of Force, issued by ICE, specifically 
prohibits the use of restraints on pregnant women or women in 
post-delivery recuperation when they do not present a flight 
risk or a danger to their own life or the lives of others 
absent ``extraordinary circumstances'' as specified in 
subsection ``F''. The Committee expects ICE to make certain 
that all detention or other contracts and agreements ensure 
that the Use of Force exception for pregnant women is fully 
implemented for all women held under an ICE detainer.

                       ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION

    The Committee recommends $96,181,000 for the Alternatives 
to Detention [ATD] program. This is $23,746,000 above the 
request and $249,000 below the enacted level. In the past few 
years, ICE has not effectively maximized the use of the ATD 
program. The Committee directs ICE to provide greater 
transparency on its use of the program--including providing 
quarterly briefings on the results of any evaluations of the 
program by field offices. ICE should post on its Web site any 
contractor evaluations and OIG reports related to the ATD 
program.

                           SECURE COMMUNITIES

    The Committee continues its support of the Secure 
Communities program and notes it has been implemented 
nationwide. As recommended in the budget, the Committee 
realigns $74,300,000 from Secure Communities to the Criminal 
Alien Program and $36,369,000 to Custody Operations.
    The Committee directs ICE to immediately resolve the open 
items listed in OIG-12-66, publish its response on its Web 
site, and brief the Committees on the specific steps it has 
taken to resolve/implement the recommendations.
    The Committee has included a provision, as requested, 
ensuring that all illegal aliens encountered when enforcing our 
immigration laws are apprehended.

                                 287(g)

    The Committee recommends $24,300,000, as requested, for the 
287(g) program.

                 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW

    The Assistant Secretary of ICE is directed to brief the 
Committee not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of 
this act on how the funds provided in Public Law 113-6 for 
system improvements, including permissive authority to transfer 
from ICE to the Department of Justice's Executive Office of 
Immigration Review [EOIR], for reducing the non-detained docket 
were applied nationwide, and the specific projects which have 
been undertaken with EOIR to make improvements and expedite 
action on the non-detained docket.

IMPACTS OF IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT ON U.S. CITIZEN CHILDREN OF REMOVED 
                                 ALIENS

    As noted in Senate Report 112-169, it is important for ICE 
to institute appropriate policies and measures to ensure that 
U.S. citizen children of illegal aliens receive all necessary 
and appropriate treatment throughout the immigration 
enforcement process. The Committee is aware that the Urban 
Institute and others are conducting a study, funded by the 
Department of Health and Human Services, focused on all aspects 
of this issue including the number of children affected by the 
detention and removal of a parent, the impact of family 
separation and loss of income on the well-being of children, 
and the short, intermediate, and long-term economic, health, 
and social service needs of these children. The final report is 
due to be released in early 2014. The Committee directs ICE to 
provide all appropriate assistance to those conducting the 
study and to implement any recommendations from the report. ICE 
shall keep the Committee regularly updated on activities 
affecting U.S. citizen children.
    The Committee directs ICE to continue to submit the 
semiannual report on ``Deportation of Parents of U.S.-Born 
Citizens''.

                    DETENTION AND REMOVAL REPORTING

    ICE is directed to continue to provide semiannual detention 
and removal reports at the same level of detail as directed in 
Senate Report 112-74.

                  TRAINING REGARDING HUMAN TRAFFICKING

    ICE plays a critical role in investigating criminal 
organizations which traffic individuals into the United States. 
The Committee encourages ICE to work with appropriate nonprofit 
organizations and victim service providers to improve the 
training of ICE officers in the field to assist in the 
identification of human trafficking victims, especially 
children, and provide appropriate referrals to victim service 
organizations.

                        AUTOMATION MODERNIZATION

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     $33,456,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      34,900,000
House allowance.........................................      34,900,000
Committee recommendation................................      34,900,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Automation Modernization account provides funds for 
major information technology [IT] projects for U.S. Immigration 
and Customs Enforcement [ICE], including modernization of TECS 
(formerly known as the Traveler Enforcement and Compliance 
System), modernization of Detention and Removal Operations' IT 
systems for tracking detainees (DRO Modernization), electronic 
health records, and other systems.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends a total of $34,900,000, the same 
as the request and $1,444,000 above the amount provided in 
fiscal year 2013. These funds are to remain available until 
September 30, 2016.
    The Committee directs that, of the funds made available to 
this account, priority shall be given to TECS modernization. 
ICE shall also brief the Committee on its progress in 
electronic health records not later than 90 days after the date 
of enactment of this act.
    The Committee also continues the requirement for semiannual 
briefings on this activity.

                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Automation modernization:
    IT investment.........................................  ................  ................             8,400
    TECS modernization....................................            22,970            34,900            23,000
    Detention and removals modernization..................             6,991  ................  ................
    Electronic health records.............................             3,495  ................             3,500
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal............................................            33,456            34,900            34,900
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                              CONSTRUCTION

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................      $4,993,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................       5,000,000
House allowance.........................................       5,000,000
Committee recommendation................................       5,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    This appropriation provides funding to plan, construct, 
renovate, equip, and maintain buildings and facilities 
necessary for the administration and enforcement of the laws 
relating to immigration, detention, and alien registration.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $5,000,000, as requested, to 
remain available until September 30, 2014. This is $7,000 above 
the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. The carryover funds 
within the Construction account will be used for emergency 
repairs and alterations, especially those focused on life and 
safety.

                 Transportation Security Administration

    The Transportation Security Administration [TSA] is charged 
with ensuring security across U.S. transportation systems, 
including aviation, railways, highways, pipelines, and 
waterways, and safeguarding the freedom of movement of people 
and commerce. Separate appropriations are provided for the 
following activities within TSA: aviation security; surface 
transportation security; transportation threat assessment and 
credentialing; transportation security support; and Federal Air 
Marshals.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends a total program level of 
$7,343,885,000 and a net of $4,907,885,000 for the activities 
of TSA for fiscal year 2014.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                     TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Fiscal year 2013   Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                             enacted\1\       budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aviation Security......................................         5,048,684          4,968,036          4,939,393
Aviation Security Capital Fund (mandatory).............           250,000            250,000            250,000
Surface Transportation Security........................           124,254            109,331            108,618
Transportation Threat Assessment and Credentialing                192,170            180,617            180,206
 (direct appropriations)...............................
Transportation Threat Assessment and Credentialing (fee-           79,720             66,000             66,000
 funded programs)......................................
Transportation Security Support........................           953,017            997,789            978,561
Federal Air Marshals...................................           906,559            826,522            821,107
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Transportation Security Administration             7,554,404          7,398,295          7,343,885
       (gross).........................................
                                                        ========================================================
Offsetting Fee Collections--current law................        -2,070,000         -2,120,000         -2,120,000
Offsetting Fee Collections--proposed increase..........  .................          -105,000   .................
Aviation Security Capital Fund (mandatory).............          -250,000           -250,000           -250,000
Fee Accounts [TTAC]....................................           -79,720            -66,000            -66,000
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Transportation Security Administration             5,154,684          4,857,295          4,907,885
       (net)...........................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                           AVIATION SECURITY

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................  $5,048,684,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................   4,968,036,000
House allowance.........................................   4,875,739,000
Committee recommendation................................   4,939,393,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Transportation Security Administration Aviation 
Security account provides for Federal aviation security, 
including screening of all passengers and baggage, deployment 
of on-site law enforcement, continuation of a uniform set of 
background requirements for airport and airline personnel, and 
deployment of explosives detection technology.
    The aviation security activities include funding for: 
Federal transportation security officers [TSOs] and private 
contract screeners; air cargo security; procurement, 
installation, and maintenance of explosives detection systems 
[EDS]; checkpoint technologies and support; and other aviation 
regulation and enforcement activities.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $4,939,393,000 for aviation 
security activities. This is $28,643,000 below the amount 
requested and $109,291,000 below the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013. Of this amount, the Committee recommends not to 
exceed $15,300 for official reception and representation 
expenses.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                                AVIATION SECURITY
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Fiscal year 2013   Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                             enacted\1\       budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Screening Operations...................................         3,972,420          3,899,525          3,850,557
Aviation Security Direction and Enforcement............         1,076,264          1,068,511          1,088,836
Aviation Security Capital Fund (mandatory).............         (250,000)          (250,000)          (250,000)
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Aviation Security.........................         5,048,684          4,968,036          4,939,393
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                         AVIATION SECURITY FEES

    The Congressional Budget Office, in its analysis of the 
President's budget, has re-estimated discretionary collections 
from aviation security fees to be $2,120,000,000 under existing 
law. According to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office, 
this amount is made up of $1,700,000,000 from passengers and 
$420,000,000 from air carriers. CBO also estimates that an 
additional $305,000,000 in passenger fees would be collected 
from the Administration's proposal to modify aviation passenger 
fees in fiscal year 2014 by applying a flat fee of $5 per one-
way trip. The Aviation and Transportation Security Act (Public 
Law 107-71) mandated that TSA impose a flat fee of $2.50 fee 
for a one-way trip with no stops and a $5 fee for a trip with 
one or more stops. Under the Administration's proposal, 
$105,000,000 of the additional collections is to be dedicated 
to aviation security costs and $200,000,000 to debt reduction.
    The recommendation assumes collection of the security fees 
estimated under existing law and does not include the 
Administration's legislative proposal to increase the fee. 
While the reasoning behind the proposed increase has merit and 
is recommended in both the House and Senate budget resolutions, 
the Committee believes this proposal should be channeled 
through the appropriate legislative committees.

                          SCREENING OPERATIONS

    The Committee recommends $3,850,557,000 for TSA Screening 
Operations. This is $48,968,000 below the amount requested and 
$121,863,000 below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                              SCREENING OPERATIONS
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Screener Workforce:
    Privatized Screening Airports.........................           147,575           153,190           153,190
    Screener personnel, compensation, and benefits........         3,076,311         3,033,526         2,982,847
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
        Subtotal, Screener Workforce......................         3,223,886         3,186,716         3,136,037
                                                           =====================================================
Screener Training and Other...............................           224,809           226,936           226,857
Checkpoint Support........................................           115,114           103,377           105,309
Explosives Detection Systems/Explosives Trace Detection
 [EDS/ETD]:
    EDS procurement and installation......................            99,852            83,987            83,845
    Screening technology maintenance and utilities........           308,759           298,509           298,509
                                                           =====================================================
      Subtotal, EDS/ETD Systems...........................           408,611           382,496           382,354
                                                           =====================================================
      Total, Screening Operations.........................         3,972,420         3,899,525         3,850,557
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                     PRIVATIZED SCREENING AIRPORTS

    The Committee recommends $153,190,000 for privatized 
screening airports. This is the same amount as requested and 
$5,615,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    TSA shall adjust its PPA line items, and notify the 
Committee within 10 days, to account for any changes in private 
screening contracts, including new awards under the Screener 
Partnership Program [SPP], or the movement from privatized 
screening into Federal screening. TSA shall also notify the 
Committee if the agency expects to spend less than the 
appropriated amount due to situations where no additional 
airports express interest in converting to privatized 
screening, or where airports currently using privatized 
screening convert to using Federal screeners. The Committee 
also expects to be briefed on any proposed changes being 
considered for the SPP program. While the TSA contracted 
independent study directed below is undertaken and further 
reviewed by GAO, the Committee directs TSA to include indirect 
costs, as recommended by GAO (GAO-09-27), in its cost 
comparisons.

                PRIVATIZED VERSUS FEDERALIZED SCREENING

    The Committee believes that the role of TSA is to make air 
travel as efficient and convenient as possible, without 
sacrificing security. Every passenger should receive the 
highest level of security, be treated with dignity and respect, 
and expect minimal wait times of 10 minutes or less. TSA has 
struggled to maintain these standards since its creation in 
2001. The question of whether a qualified private screening 
company could perform this security service better and at the 
same or lower cost as TSA has not been fully answered since the 
agency has been in existence. A recent GAO report (GAO-13-208) 
recommended mechanisms to monitor private screening performance 
separately from Federal screeners which could benefit TSA in 
identifying positive or negative trends and ensure that all 
airports operate at their optimal level. The Committee believes 
that such a comparison would benefit TSA, airports considering 
privatization, and the traveling public. Therefore, within the 
funding provided in the ``Aviation Security'' appropriation, 
the Committee instructs the TSA Administrator to allocate 
resources for an independent study of the performance of 
federalized airports compared to privatized airports. The study 
shall include, but not be limited to, security effectiveness, 
cost, throughput, wait times, management efficiencies, and 
customer satisfaction. At a minimum, the study should compare a 
privatized airport to a Federalized airport in each of the five 
airport categories (CAT X, I, II, III, and IV) and be completed 
within 1 year from the date of enactment of this act. With 
respect to TSA cost estimates, the study shall include indirect 
costs as recommended by GAO in report (GAO-09-27R). A copy of 
this study shall also be provided to GAO for review. GAO shall 
brief the Committee within 90 days of receipt of the study on 
its assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the report.

             SCREENER PERSONNEL, COMPENSATION, AND BENEFITS

    The Committee recommends $2,982,847,000 for Screener 
Personnel, Compensation, and Benefits. This is $50,679,000 
below the amount requested and $93,464,000 below the amount 
provided in fiscal year 2013. Because TSA has removed 250 
backscatter AIT machines from the field, staffing for those 
machines is no longer necessary. Therefore, the recommended 
amount for AIT staffing is reduced by $28,000,000 below the 
request.
    The Committee does not include a statutory cap on TSA 
screening personnel. Consistent with the 9/11 Act, the 
Secretary of Homeland Security shall recruit and hire screeners 
as may be necessary to provide appropriate levels of aviation 
security and to ensure that average passenger wait times do not 
exceed 10 minutes.
    Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this 
act, TSA shall brief the Committee on the Aviation Screening 
Assessment Program's performance testing results and how the 
agency is adapting to address vulnerabilities.

                      SCREENER TRAINING AND OTHER

    The Committee recommends $226,857,000 for Screener Training 
and Other. This is $79,000 below the amount requested and 
$2,048,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. Funds 
are provided to support training of TSOs and other direct costs 
associated with TSO operations, such as: consumable supplies, 
checkpoint janitorial services, travel for the National 
Deployment Force, uniform allowances, hazardous materials 
disposal, and a model workforce program. The recommendation 
reflects the requested realignment of funding from other 
accounts to better align programmatic activities.

                            CUSTOMER SERVICE

    TSA has recently initiated a program to train volunteer 
Transportation Security Officers to become Passenger Support 
Specialists [PSS]. The job of the TSOs in this program is to 
aid passengers who need extra assistance at the checkpoint. 
Additional training is provided to the TSOs to help resolve 
traveler-related screening concerns and assist travelers with 
disabilities and medical conditions. The Committee believes 
this initiative could drastically improve customer service if 
implemented agency-wide and directs TSA to include PSS training 
in basic TSO training.

                      BEHAVIOR DETECTION OFFICERS

    On Thursday, June 6, 2013, the DHS OIG released a report 
(OIG-13-91) on TSA's Screening of Passengers by Observation 
Techniques program, where behavior detection officers screen 
passengers by observing their behavior in order to detect 
characteristics of a high-risk passenger. The report found the 
following: ``TSA did not (1) assess the effectiveness of the 
Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques program, (2) 
have a comprehensive training program, (3) ensure outreach to 
its partners, or (4) have a financial plan''. According to the 
OIG, TSA concurred with the recommendations and is in the 
process of implementing them. TSA is directed to brief the 
Committee not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of 
this act on the progress being made to implement the OIG 
recommendations.

                           CHECKPOINT SUPPORT

    The Committee recommends $105,309,000 for Checkpoint 
Support. This is $1,932,000 above the amount requested and 
$9,805,000 below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. Funds 
are provided to field test and deploy equipment for passenger 
screening, carry-on baggage screening, checkpoint 
reconfiguration, electronic surveillance of checkpoints, and 
operational integration of systems. As stated in the budget 
request, currently deployed technologies include walk-through 
metal detectors, explosives trace detection, bottled liquid 
scanners, chemical analysis devices, advanced technology 
systems, and Advanced Imaging Technology [AIT]. The budget also 
indicates that two new technologies will begin deployment in 
fiscal year 2014, credential authentication technology and 
portable explosives detection trace detectors, and development 
of automated wait time systems will continue. The 
recommendation includes an additional $2,000,000 to establish 
technology pilots to evaluate the effectiveness of exit lane 
screening solutions. This increase is discussed later in this 
report.
    The Committee encourages TSA to pursue the development and 
deployment of systems that will increase security at the 
checkpoint while offering passengers the benefit of reduced 
divestment. This should include the development of improved 
explosives detection and AIT systems with lower false alarm 
rates, more effective resolution, improved protection of 
privacy and civil rights, and the ability to simultaneously 
scan shoes for threats.

               ADVANCED INTEGRATED SCREENING TECHNOLOGIES

    Pursuant to a statutory requirement in the bill, TSA is to 
continue providing a report on advanced integrated passenger 
screening technologies for the most effective security of 
passengers and baggage not later than 90 days after the date of 
enactment of this act. The report provides a useful description 
of existing and emerging equipment capable of detecting threats 
concealed on passengers and in baggage. The Committee has added 
a new element to the report, which is a requirement to include 
projected funding levels for the next five fiscal years for 
each technology discussed in the report. The information 
contained in this report should be shared with TSA's industry 
partners, to the maximum extent practicable, to allow for 
necessary research, planning, and development of passenger and 
baggage screening technologies. By adding a multi-year 
requirement to this report, a separate 5-year strategic plan of 
investments is no longer required.

                      ADVANCED IMAGING TECHNOLOGY

    TSA is to continue its frequent briefings on AIT, which is 
used to screen passengers for metallic and non-metallic 
threats, including weapons, explosives, and other objects 
concealed under layers of clothing. The briefings are to 
include: procurement details; cost; schedule; associated 
staffing requirements; utilization rates; deployments; 
throughput rates; progress on the development of AIT-2 and 
next-generation units; and any changes to requirements for full 
operating capability.

                    RISK-BASED SCREENING INITIATIVES

    TSA should be commended for streamlining screening 
procedures for Pre-Check travelers, children under 12, senior 
citizens, flight attendants, and active duty military 
personnel. But today, the vast majority of Americans who fly 
are still being processed through an ineffective one-size-fits-
all approach. Closing that gap will yield security, budgetary, 
and economic benefits to both the agency and the flying public.
    For Pre-Check, TSA must offer enrollment opportunities that 
can reach beyond the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Global 
Entry program and elite frequent fliers if a truly risk-based 
aviation security system is to be put in place. The Committee 
understands that TSA is considering the launch of a TSA Pre-
Check Trusted Traveler program that will enable travelers who 
do not have a passport, or those who do not want to travel 
internationally (or those not interested in Global Entry 
participation), to directly apply for TSA Pre-Check 
eligibility. TSA is also considering the use of third-party 
vendors to prescreen passengers for expedited screening using 
commercial information. These are commonsense modifications to 
the program that will help TSA meet its goal of one in four 
members of the traveling public being eligible for expedited 
screening by the end of 2013 and 50 percent eligibility by the 
end of calendar year 2014.
    To encourage implementation of pre-check expansion 
initiatives, the Committee includes bill language directing the 
Administrator to certify that one in four members of the 
traveling public is eligible for expedited screening by the end 
of calendar year 2013 and requires a strategy to expand the 
eligibility of the traveling public to 50 percent by the end of 
calendar year 2014. TSA shall also continue to encourage TSA 
Pre-Check participating airlines to provide reciprocal 
recognition of eligible frequent flyers.

                           EXIT LANE SECURITY

    The budget request includes a reduction of $88,100,000 and 
over 2,000 positions as a result of transitioning access 
control at exit lanes from TSA to commercial airports. 
According to the agency, the current fiscal environment has 
caused the prioritization of resources on the physical 
screening of passengers and their belongings. Exit lanes are 
locations where the public, generally passengers departing the 
airport, may exit the sterile area into the public area. 
Currently, TSA controls access to approximately 355 of the 956 
exit lanes at the Nation's commercial airports. This security 
posture has been in place primarily at exit lanes that are 
collocated with a screening checkpoint. TSA has proposed an 
amendment to the Airport Security Program that would require 
airport operators to assume access control responsibility at 
exit lanes controlled by TSA. Before implementing the proposed 
amendment, the TSA Administrator is to certify to the Committee 
that security standards will remain at or above current levels 
and airports affected by this policy will have a variety of low 
cost technology solutions available to them to carry out this 
new exit lane responsibility, thereby reducing the burden on 
airport operators. A recent exit lane security study conducted 
by the National Safe Skies Alliance at the request of TSA found 
that airport exit lanes can be secured with appropriate 
technologies that increase the level of security while 
simultaneously reducing the cost to secure each exit lane. The 
Committee has included an additional $2,000,000 within the 
checkpoint support PPA to establish technology pilots to 
evaluate the effectiveness of these exit lane screening 
solutions.
    Before implementing this new policy, TSA is to brief the 
Committee on its transition plan, including the roles and 
responsibilities for clearing select individuals that currently 
enter through exit lanes, such as law enforcement officers, 
Federal Air Marshals, and known crewmembers. Additionally, TSA 
shall note any airports where transitioning exit lane 
responsibility does not result in adjustments to staffing at 
such airports.

                     EQUIPMENT INVENTORY MANAGEMENT

    The Committee understands that TSA has been working to 
implement improvements based on the recent report by the DHS 
Inspector General (OIG-13-82) regarding the procurement, 
deployment, and storage of airport security-related equipment. 
The report found that TSA ``stored unusable or obsolete 
equipment, maintained inappropriate safety stock levels, and 
did not develop an inventory management process that 
systematically deploys screening equipment.'' Additionally TSA 
did not use all of its available storage space. The Committee 
understands that TSA has since reduced its leasable warehouse 
space, reducing costs by 21 percent, expedited the removal of 
surplus equipment in its inventory, and reduced the amount of 
screening equipment in storage to a small fraction of overall 
agency and Federal Government-wide equipment inventory. TSA 
shall periodically update the Committee as it continues to 
improve its inventory management procedures.

                      EXPLOSIVES DETECTION SYSTEMS

    The Committee recommends $83,845,000 for Explosives 
Detection Systems procurement and installation. This is 
$142,000 below the amount requested and $16,007,000 below the 
amount provided in fiscal year 2013. An additional $250,000,000 
in mandatory spending will be available from Aviation Security 
Capital Fund [ASCF] fee collections. The total discretionary 
and mandatory funding will allow TSA to purchase and install 
approximately 56 EDS units in fiscal year 2014 and fund 23 
facility modification projects.
    The Committee notes that approximately $560,000,000 in 
unobligated/uncommitted prior year balances remain for EDS 
procurement and installation, some of which have remained 
unspent for over 6 years. There is no reason to maintain such 
high carryover balances for such a long period of time. TSA is 
to update the Committee monthly on obligations for these 
balances, including the airport projects being implemented and 
planned, as well as a schedule for completion.
    The Committee understands that there are multiple EDS 
technologies in the process of being certified or qualified by 
TSA at the same time that facility modifications for checked 
baggage screening optimization are being planned at numerous 
airports. The Committee recognizes that TSA conducts extensive 
and necessary operational field tests with the screening 
systems prior to placing them on the qualified products list to 
ensure reliable performance of EDS in the field. Given that 
these next generation EDS systems have the potential to screen 
1,400 more bags per hour compared to current generation 
machines, TSA is encouraged to accelerate this process, to the 
maximum extent practicable, to ensure that optimal systems are 
able to be considered in airport designs for checked baggage 
screening systems and available for deployment in a more 
expedient manner. The Committee expects that TSA will share 
relevant cost/benefit data about next generation EDS systems 
with airports that are planning optimization projects to 
replace EDS equipment at the end of its useful life. In 
addition, the Committee directs TSA to further expedite the 
acquisition of qualified systems by establishing development 
gateways whereby capable third party testing facilities can 
assist in accelerating technologies through the qualification 
process and improve TSA's ability to more efficiently test, 
acquire, and deploy effective and suitable technologies.
    Section 44923 of title 49 requires that the $250,000,000 in 
annual mandatory funding deposited into the ASCF is to be 
available for airport security improvement projects, such as 
facility modifications. However, procurement and installation 
of EDS equipment associated with these projects is not 
permitted. With a diminishing base of airport applications 
seeking large improvement projects and the need to replace 
aging EDS machines currently deployed at airports, the 
recommendation continues bill language, as requested, to permit 
ASCF funding to be used to procure and install EDS equipment 
during fiscal year 2014. This will allow TSA to more 
effectively, economically, and expeditiously plan and implement 
the acquisition and replacement of existing EDS units. TSA is 
to work with the appropriate committees of jurisdiction if it 
desires a permanent solution to this problem.
    The Committee also directs TSA to submit its formal EDS 
recapitalization plan as described in the budget request no 
later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this act. In 
addition, the report is to include a replacement plan for 
explosives trace detection [ETD] systems that are reaching the 
end of their operational service life and their locations (both 
for checked baggage and passenger screening). TSA is to provide 
a briefing to the Committee not later than 60 days after the 
date of enactment of this act explaining its timeline and 
progress toward completion of operational testing and 
evaluation of next generation ETD systems.

           EXPENDITURE PLANS FOR EDS/CHECKPOINT TECHNOLOGIES

    The Committee includes statutory language under the 
``Transportation Security Support'' appropriation withholding 
the obligation of $20,000,000 for Headquarters Administration 
until TSA submits to the Committee, no later than 60 days after 
the date of enactment of this act, detailed expenditure plans 
for fiscal year 2014 for checkpoint security and EDS 
refurbishment, procurement, and installations on an airport-by-
airport basis. The withholding is included to encourage timely 
submissions of materials necessary for robust and informed 
oversight. The plans shall include specific technologies for 
purchase, program schedules and major milestones, a schedule 
for obligation of the funds, recapitalization priorities, 
status of operational testing for each passenger screening 
technology under development, and a table detailing actual 
versus anticipated unobligated balances at the close of the 
fiscal year. The plan shall also include details on passenger 
screening pilot programs that are in progress or being 
considered for implementation in fiscal year 2014. Information 
in this section is to include a summary of the pilot program 
describing what the program is attempting to achieve; potential 
capabilities and benefits of the program; the airports where 
the pilots will be operating; funding commitments; and plans 
for future expansion. The Committee expects TSA to include more 
detailed program schedules for passenger screening technologies 
included in the expenditure plan. Schedules should include all 
milestones from the issuance of a request for proposal to 
deployment. TSA shall brief the Committee at the end of the 
second, third, and fourth quarters with an update on EDS and 
checkpoint expenditures, including an explanation of any 
deviation from the original plan.

   INSTALLATION OF OPTIMAL BAGGAGE SCREENING SYSTEMS AND FTE SAVINGS

    With the funding provided in this act and in prior 
appropriations acts for EDS procurement and installation, TSA 
is able to greatly expedite the deployment of in-line checked 
baggage screening systems, thereby permitting a reduction in 
personnel. For instance, by the end of fiscal year 2014, TSA 
estimates that 262 airports will have optimal checked baggage 
screening solutions. TSA shall report to the Committees, in 
tandem with the annual budget request, on the savings achieved 
and anticipated by fiscal year from the installation of new in-
line systems.

 AIRPORTS THAT HAVE INCURRED ELIGIBLE COSTS FOR IN-LINE BAGGAGE SYSTEM 
                               DEPLOYMENT

    As required by the 9/11 Act, TSA is to give funding 
consideration to airports that incurred eligible costs for EDS 
and that were not recipients of funding agreements. The fiscal 
year 2014 EDS expenditure plan shall identify airports eligible 
for funding pursuant to section 1604(b)(2) of Public Law 110-53 
and funding, if any, allocated to reimburse those airports.

             SCREENING TECHNOLOGY MAINTENANCE AND UTILITIES

    The Committee recommends $298,509,000 for Screening 
Technology Maintenance and Utilities. This is the same amount 
as requested and $10,250,000 below the amount provided in 
fiscal year 2013. The reduction below fiscal year 2013 reflects 
requested reductions identified for administrative savings, 
longer warranties, more efficient screening security equipment, 
and a high unobligated balance.

              AVIATION SECURITY DIRECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

    The Committee recommends $1,088,836,000 for Aviation 
Security Direction and Enforcement. This is $20,325,000 above 
the amount requested and $12,572,000 above the amount provided 
in fiscal year 2013. The following table summarizes the 
Committee's recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 
and budget request levels:

                                   AVIATION SECURITY DIRECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aviation regulation and other enforcement.................           367,968           354,650           353,187
Airport management and support............................           561,911           590,871           588,317
Federal flight deck officer and flight crew training......            24,711  ................            25,000
Air cargo.................................................           121,674           122,990           122,332
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Aviation Security Direction and Enforcement..         1,076,264         1,068,511         1,088,836
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

               AVIATION REGULATION AND OTHER ENFORCEMENT

    The Committee recommends $353,187,000 for Aviation 
Regulation and Other Enforcement. This is $1,463,000 below the 
amount requested and $14,781,000 below the amount provided in 
fiscal year 2013. The recommended amount provides for law 
enforcement and regulatory activities at airports to: ensure 
compliance with required security measures, respond to security 
incidents, and provide international support for worldwide 
security requirements. The recommended amount provides 
$88,700,000 for the National Canine Program, as requested, 
which helps support 921 teams in fiscal year 2014. Another 
$6,700,000 for the National Canine Program is funded through 
the ``Surface Transportation Security'' appropriation. TSA 
funded canine teams have proven to be a reliable, effective, 
and efficient way to screen for explosive devices. Since the 
beginning of fiscal year 2007 a total of 452 canine teams have 
been added, an increase of over 87 percent.
    In the 2003 Vision 100--Century of Aviation Reauthorization 
Act, Congress directed TSA to issue ``final regulations to 
ensure the security of foreign and domestic aircraft repair 
stations''. In a 2011 letter to stakeholders, TSA stated its 
expectation that approval and publication of the final rule was 
anticipated by the fourth quarter of calendar year 2012. Today, 
the rule still has not been published. The Committee urges OMB 
to expedite its review of the final rule and subsequent 
publication by TSA.

                     AIRPORT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT

    The Committee recommends $588,317,000 for Airport 
Management and Support. This is $2,554,000 below the amount 
requested and $26,406,000 above the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013. Funds are provided for: the workforce to support TSA 
Federal security directors; Bomb Appraisal Officers; Explosives 
Security Specialists; the Transportation Security Operations 
Center; airport rent and furniture; a vehicle fleet; airport 
parking; and employee transit benefits. The Committee includes 
the requested realignment of funds from the ``Transportation 
Security Support'', ``Surface Transportation'', and ``Federal 
Air Marshals'' appropriations to merge like costs into one 
account.

     FEDERAL FLIGHT DECK OFFICER AND FLIGHT CREW TRAINING PROGRAMS

    The Committee recommends $25,000,000 for the Federal Flight 
Deck Officer [FFDO] and Flight Crew Training programs. This is 
$25,000,000 above the amount requested and $289,000 above the 
amount provided in fiscal year 2013. Funds are provided to 
deputize qualified airline pilots who volunteer to be Federal 
law enforcement officers and to provide initial and recurrent 
law enforcement training. Funds are also provided for the Crew 
Member Self-Defense Training program for the purpose of 
teaching crew members basic self-defense concepts and 
techniques.
    The Committee disagrees with the request, which proposes 
that the FFDO program be funded by the airlines through 
reimbursable agreements with the Federal Law Enforcement 
Training Center. The proposed cut would prevent dedicated 
flight crews who volunteer for this program from receiving 
training that could protect commercial flights and the 
passengers on them.

                               AIR CARGO

    The Committee recommends $122,332,000 for Air Cargo 
security. This is $658,000 below the amount requested and 
$658,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. Funds 
are provided to secure the air cargo supply chain, conveyances, 
and people.
    The Committee continues a statutory provision requiring the 
TSA Administrator to either certify that 100-percent screening 
of inbound cargo has been met or submit a strategy for 
compliance with the 100-percent mandate as stipulated under 
title 44901(g) of title 49, United States Code. According to 
the Department, as of December 3, 2012, all air carriers were 
required to be in compliance with the 100-percent screening 
requirement for air cargo. TSA is currently in the process of 
compiling data to verify compliance and expects to execute the 
certification in the late summer of 2013. TSA is to brief the 
Committee if the certification is delayed beyond September 3, 
2013.
    The Committee includes statutory language under 
``Transportation Security Support'' restricting $20,000,000 
from being obligated for headquarters administration until TSA 
submits to the Committee, no later than 60 days after the date 
of enactment of this act, an expenditure plan on the allocation 
of air cargo funds, including carryover balances. Due to delays 
in receiving the air cargo expenditure plan in prior years, the 
withholding is included to encourage timely submissions of 
materials necessary for robust and informed oversight.

                    SURFACE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $124,254,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     109,331,000
House allowance.........................................     124,294,000
Committee recommendation................................     108,618,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    Surface transportation security provides funding for 
personnel and operational resources to assess the risk of a 
terrorist attack on nonaviation modes of transportation, 
standards and procedures to address those risks, and to ensure 
compliance with established regulations and policies.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $108,618,000 for Surface 
Transportation Security. This is $713,000 below the amount 
requested and $15,636,000 below the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013. Funds are available to assess the risk of terrorist 
attacks for all non-aviation transportation modes, issue 
regulations to improve the security of those modes, and enforce 
regulations to ensure the protection of the transportation 
system. The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                         SURFACE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staffing and operations...................................            36,305            35,433            35,262
Surface transportation security inspectors and canines....            87,949            73,898            73,356
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Surface Transportation Security..............           124,254           109,331           108,618
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

        SURFACE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY STAFFING AND OPERATIONS

    The Committee recommends $35,262,000 for Surface 
Transportation Security Staffing and Operations. This is 
$171,000 below the amount requested and $1,043,000 below the 
amount provided in fiscal year 2013.

         SURFACE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY INSPECTORS AND CANINES

    The Committee recommends $73,356,000 for Surface 
Transportation Security Inspectors and Canines. This is 
$542,000 below the amount requested and $14,593,000 below the 
amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    Since 2001, terrorist attacks on mass transit, buses, and 
passenger rail have resulted in more than 3,900 deaths and 
14,000 injuries worldwide. In October 2012, Federal authorities 
arrested a man in northern Virginia for conspiring to bomb 
Metrorail stations in the Washington, DC region and in April 
2013, authorities arrested two men of planning attacks against 
a passenger train traveling between Canada and the United 
States. It is now more important than ever to increase our 
defenses against similar plots. Intelligence gathered from 
Osama bin Laden's compound revealed evidence that al Qaeda 
considered rail lines high-value targets. TSA is to brief the 
Committee no later than 90 days after the date of enactment of 
this act on its multimodal technology pilots and initiatives. 
The briefing shall include a summary of all technology pilot 
programs/initiatives TSA will have operating or has planned for 
fiscal year 2014; what each program/initiative is attempting to 
achieve; potential capabilities and benefits of the program/
initiative; locations of each program/initiative; and plans for 
future expansion.

           TRANSPORTATION THREAT ASSESSMENT AND CREDENTIALING

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $192,170,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     180,617,000
House allowance.........................................     182,617,000
Committee recommendation................................     180,206,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    Transportation threat assessment and credentialing includes 
several TSA credentialing programs: Secure Flight, Crew 
Vetting, Screening Administration and Operations, Registered 
Traveler, Transportation Worker Identification Credential, 
Hazardous Materials Commercial Drivers License Endorsement 
Program, and Alien Flight School.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $180,206,000 for Transportation 
Threat Assessment and Credentialing. This is $411,000 below the 
amount requested and $11,964,000 below the amount provided in 
fiscal year 2013. In addition, an estimated $66,000,000 in fee 
collections is available for these activities in fiscal year 
2014, as proposed in the budget.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                               TRANSPORTATION THREAT ASSESSMENT AND CREDENTIALING
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direct Appropriations:
    Secure Flight.........................................           106,794           106,198           105,919
    Crew and other vetting programs.......................            85,376            74,419            74,287
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, direct appropriations.....................           192,170           180,617           180,206
                                                           =====================================================
Fee Collections:
    Transportation worker identification credential.......            47,300            36,700            36,700
    Hazardous materials...................................            12,000            12,000            12,000
    Alien flight school (transfer from DOJ)...............             5,000             5,000             5,000
    Air cargo/certified cargo screening program...........             7,200             5,400             5,400
    Commercial aviation and airports/secure identification             8,000             6,500             6,500
     display area checks..................................
    Other security threat assessments.....................               120                50                50
    General aviation at DCA...............................               100               350               350
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, fee collections...........................            79,720            66,000            66,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                             SECURE FLIGHT

    The Committee recommends $105,919,000 for Secure Flight. 
This is $279,000 below the amount requested and $875,000 below 
the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. As recommended by the 
9/11 Commission and mandated by the Intelligence Reform Act, 
this program transferred the responsibility of airline 
passenger watch list matching from the air carriers to the 
Federal Government.
    The Committee recommendation includes $7,000,000 in base 
funding for Secure Flight to provide more robust pre-screening 
of passengers participating in Pre-Check and $12,717,000 for 
watchlist screening for passengers of large general aviation 
aircraft. The Intelligence Reform Act mandates that DHS make 
advanced passenger pre-screening available to charter operators 
and lessors of aircraft greater than 12,500 pounds flying into, 
out of, or within the United States. A rule on large aviation 
aircraft is expected to be published in the coming months.

                    CREW AND OTHER VETTING PROGRAMS

    The Committee recommends $74,287,000 for Crew and Other 
Vetting Programs. This is $132,000 below the amount requested 
and $11,089,000 below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    The Committee supports TSA's efforts to modernize its 
vetting and credentialing infrastructure, which is currently 
made up of disconnected and duplicative systems. This has 
resulted in high-system complexity and lengthy adjudication 
processes due to manual reviews. TSA intends to modernize its 
system to address these issues and improve vetting and 
credentialing services. Following several delays in the 
development of this system, TSA has refined its acquisition 
strategy, awarded a contract for system development, and now 
appears to be on track to achieve initial operating capability 
in 2013. The Committee is also encouraged by TSA's new 
lifecycle cost estimate, which was reduced substantially from 
projections made in the early stages of this acquisition. The 
Committee includes $48,700,000, as requested, for this effort 
in fiscal year 2014 and expects TSA to continue its quarterly 
briefings on its efforts to develop this new vetting system.

         TRANSPORTATION WORKER IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIAL [TWIC]

    The Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2012 was 
signed into law on December 20, 2012 (Public Law 112-213) and 
included a requirement under section 709 that TSA reform the 
process within 270 days for TWIC enrollment, activation, 
issuance, and renewal to require, in total, no more than one 
in-person visit to a designated enrollment center except in 
cases in which there are extenuating circumstances as 
determined by the Secretary. The Committee is pleased that TSA 
has developed a TWIC OneVisit implementation plan, and notes 
the scheduled launch of a pilot initiative in Alaska utilizing 
a manual solution during the third quarter of fiscal year 2013, 
followed by an initiative at a second location utilizing an 
automated mailing solution in early fiscal year 2014, and 
culminating in a nationwide launch of a fully automated 
solution in late fiscal year 2014. The Committee directs TSA to 
remain focused on its efforts to implement the requirements 
under section 709 of the Coast Guard and Maritime 
Transportation Act of 2012 and comply with the statutory 
deadlines established under that act. Not later than 30 days 
after the date of enactment of this act, the Administrator is 
directed to submit a report to the Committee on the plan and 
timeline for implementing section 709 and other plans to ease 
the burden on workers who must travel hundreds of miles at 
great personal expense to obtain a TWIC card.

                    TRANSPORTATION SECURITY SUPPORT

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $953,017,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     997,789,000
House allowance.........................................     897,666,000
Committee recommendation................................     978,561,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Transportation Security Support account supports the 
operational needs of TSA's extensive airport/field personnel 
and infrastructure. Transportation Security Support includes: 
headquarters' personnel, pay, benefits, and support; 
intelligence; mission support centers; human capital services; 
and information technology support.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $978,561,000 for Transportation 
Security Support. This is $19,228,000 below the amount 
requested and $25,544,000 above the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                         TRANSPORTATION SECURITY SUPPORT
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Fiscal year     Fiscal year
                                                                      2013         2014 budget      Committee
                                                                   enacted\1\        request     recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Headquarters administration....................................         275,758         284,942          276,000
Information technology.........................................         416,645         455,484          450,000
Human capital services.........................................         215,544         212,554          208,000
Intelligence...................................................          45,070          44,809           44,561
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
      Total, Transportation Security Support...................         953,017         997,789          978,561
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                      HEADQUARTERS ADMINISTRATION

    The Committee recommends $276,000,000 for Headquarters 
Administration. This is $8,942,000 below the amount requested 
and $242,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    TSA shall continue semiannual briefings on covert testing 
activities, to include the latest metrics gathered from recent 
tests and resulting mitigating factors.
    The Committee includes bill language withholding the 
obligation of $20,000,000 for Headquarters Administration until 
fiscal year 2014 expenditure plans for air cargo security, 
explosives detection systems procurement and installation, and 
checkpoint support are provided to the Committee. The 
expenditure plans are due no later than 60 days after the date 
of enactment of this act.

                         INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

    The Committee recommends $450,000,000 for Information 
Technology. This is $5,484,000 below the amount requested and 
$33,355,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. This 
level includes the realignment of funds from the ``Federal Air 
Marshals'' appropriation to consolidate like functions.

                         HUMAN CAPITAL SERVICES

    The Committee recommends $208,000,000 for Human Capital 
Services. This is $4,554,000 below the amount requested and 
$7,544,000 below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    This reduction includes management efficiencies, 
administrative savings, other one-time costs no longer 
necessary to support hires funded in prior years, and a 
transfer to the ``Aviation Security'' appropriation to support 
training activities.

                              INTELLIGENCE

    The Committee recommends $44,561,000 for Intelligence 
activities. This is $248,000 below the amount requested and 
$509,000 below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.

                          FEDERAL AIR MARSHALS

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $906,559,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     826,522,000
House allowance.........................................     821,107,000
Committee recommendation................................     821,107,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Federal Air Marshals [FAMs] protect the air 
transportation system against terrorist threats, sabotage, and 
other acts of violence. The FAMs account provides funds for the 
salaries, benefits, travel, training, and other expenses of the 
program.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $821,107,000 for Federal Air 
Marshals. This is $5,415,000 below the amount requested and 
$85,452,000 below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. This 
funding decrease reflects the realignment of FAMs support 
functions from this appropriation into the ``Aviation Security 
Direction and Enforcement'' and ``Transportation Security 
Support'' appropriations, as discussed earlier in this report.
    The Committee directs TSA to submit quarterly reports on 
mission coverage, staffing levels, and hiring rates as in prior 
years.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                              FEDERAL AIR MARSHALS
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management and administration.............................           792,738           714,669           709,254
Travel and training.......................................           113,821           111,853           111,853
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Federal Air Marshals.........................           906,559           826,522           821,107
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                       United States Coast Guard

                                SUMMARY

    The Coast Guard's primary responsibilities are the 
enforcement of all applicable Federal laws on the high seas and 
waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; 
promotion of safety of life and property at sea; assistance to 
navigation; protection of the marine environment; and 
maintenance of a state of readiness to function as a 
specialized service in the Navy in time of war, as authorized 
by sections 1 and 2 of title 14, United States Code.
    The Commandant of the Coast Guard reports directly to the 
Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The President's fiscal year 2014 discretionary budget 
request proposes to reduce funding for the Coast Guard by 8 
percent, including the reduction of over 850 military billets, 
the movement of 1,050 reservists to inactive status resulting 
in the smallest reserve force since 1957, the decommissioning 
of critical operational assets, and a 38 percent reduction in 
capital expenditures to a level not seen since 2003. When 
testifying before the subcommittee on the fiscal year 2014 
budget request, the Commandant of the Coast Guard said that the 
proposed budget reductions could cause a ``death spiral'', as 
the agency would be forced to sustain cutters that average over 
46 years of age instead of having funding to procure new 
vessels and aircraft. If the budget request were to be enacted, 
the Coast Guard's ability to carry out its 11 statutory 
missions would be seriously hampered. The recommended level 
provided for in this bill includes targeted increases above the 
President's request to ensure that Coast Guard personnel 
serving on the front lines have the resources and assets to 
fulfill their many missions in fiscal year 2014 and in the 
future.
    The Committee recommends a total program level of 
$10,072,467,000 for the activities of the Coast Guard for 
fiscal year 2014. When costs for overseas contingency 
operations are excluded, the recommendation for the Coast Guard 
is $335,382,000 and 448 positions above the request. The 
recommendation also restores 600 reservist positions to active 
status. The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                          COAST GUARD--FUNDING SUMMARY
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                           Fiscal year 2014
                                                         Fiscal year 2013       budget            Committee
                                                             enacted\1\       request\2\      recommendations\3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Expenses.....................................         7,065,780         6,755,383           7,026,346
Environmental Compliance and Restoration...............            13,134            13,187              13,165
Reserve Training.......................................           132,353           109,543             122,491
Acquisition, Construction, and Improvements............      \4\1,817,586           951,116           1,229,684
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation............            19,664            19,856              19,781
Health Care Fund Contribution (Permanent Indefinite               203,000           201,000             201,000
 Appropriations).......................................
Retired Pay............................................         1,423,000         1,460,000           1,460,000
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Coast Guard...............................        10,674,517         9,510,085          10,072,467
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.
\2\Excludes a permissive transfer of up to $227,033,000 from ``Operation and Maintenance, Navy'' for overseas
  contingency operations.
\3\Includes $227,000,000 for overseas contingency operations.
\4\Includes emergency funding of $274,233,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of
  Public Law 113-2).

    The Coast Guard will pay an estimated $201,000,000 in 
fiscal year 2014 to the Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Care 
Fund for the costs of military Medicare-eligible health 
benefits earned by its uniformed servicemembers. The 
contribution is funded by permanent indefinite discretionary 
authority pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act 
for fiscal year 2005 (Public Law 108-375).

                           OPERATING EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................  $7,065,780,000
Budget estimate, 2014\2\................................   6,755,383,000
House allowance\2\......................................   6,839,416,000
Committee recommendation................................   7,026,346,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Excludes a permissive transfer of $227,033,000 from ``Operation and 
Maintenance, Navy'' for overseas contingency operations.

    The Operating Expenses appropriation provides funds for the 
operation and maintenance of multipurpose vessels, aircraft, 
and shore units strategically located along the coasts and 
inland waterways of the United States and in selected areas 
overseas. The program activities of this appropriation fall 
into the following categories:
    Search and Rescue.--As one of its earliest and most 
traditional missions, the Coast Guard maintains a nationwide 
system of boats, aircraft, cutters, and rescue coordination 
centers on 24-hour alert.
    Aids to Navigation.--To help mariners determine their 
location and avoid accidents, the Coast Guard maintains a 
network of manned and unmanned aids to navigation along the 
Nation's coasts and on its inland waterways. In addition, the 
Coast Guard operates radio stations in the United States and 
abroad to serve the needs of the armed services and marine and 
air commerce.
    Marine Safety.--The Coast Guard ensures compliance with 
Federal statutes and regulations designed to improve safety in 
the merchant marine industry and operates a recreational 
boating safety program.
    Marine Environmental Protection.--The primary objectives of 
the marine environmental protection program are to minimize the 
dangers of marine pollution and to assure the safety of ports 
and waterways.
    Enforcement of Laws and Treaties.--The Coast Guard is the 
principal maritime enforcement agency with regard to Federal 
laws on the navigable waters of the United States and the high 
seas, including fisheries, drug smuggling, illegal immigration, 
and hijacking of vessels.
    Ice Operations.--In the Arctic and Antarctic, Coast Guard 
icebreakers escort supply ships, support research activities 
and Department of Defense operations, survey uncharted waters, 
and collect scientific data. The Coast Guard also assists 
commercial vessels through ice-covered waters.
    Defense Readiness.--During peacetime, the Coast Guard 
maintains an effective state of military preparedness to 
operate as a service in the Navy in time of war or national 
emergency at the direction of the President. As such, the Coast 
Guard has primary responsibility for the security of ports, 
waterways, and navigable waters up to 200 miles offshore.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $7,026,346,000 for Coast Guard 
Operating Expenses, including $24,500,000 from the Oil Spill 
Liability Trust Fund and $567,000,000 for Coast Guard defense-
related activities, of which $227,000,000 is for Overseas 
Contingency Operations. Of this amount, the Committee 
recommends not to exceed $15,300 for official reception and 
representation expenses.
    The recommendation level is $270,963,000 above the amount 
requested and $39,434,000 below the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013. The Committee's recommendation is $43,963,000 above 
the comparable net request for Coast Guard Operating Expenses 
when excluding funds provided for overseas contingency 
operations.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                               OPERATING EXPENSES
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              Fiscal year 2014
                                                            Fiscal year 2013       budget           Committee
                                                               enacted\1\        request\2\      recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military pay and allowances...............................         3,410,674         3,425,306         3,434,674
Civilian pay and benefits.................................           785,542           784,097           779,320
Training and recruiting...................................           213,900           181,617           199,907
Operating funds and unit level maintenance................         1,092,449         1,061,567         1,064,361
Centrally managed accounts................................           350,609           318,856           319,147
Intermediate and depot level maintenance..................           958,606           983,940           989,137
St. Elizabeths support costs..............................  ................  ................            12,800
Overseas contingency operations...........................           254,000  ................           227,000
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Operating Expenses...........................         7,065,780         6,755,383         7,026,346
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.
\2\Excludes a permissive transfer of up to $227,033,000 from ``Operation and Maintenance, Navy'' for overseas
  contingency operations.

                    OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

    The Committee provides $227,000,000 for Coast Guard 
operations in support of overseas contingency operations. While 
funding for these activities is requested in the Department of 
Defense budget for the Navy, the Committee adopted a practice 
beginning in the fiscal year 2009 Supplemental Appropriations 
Act to appropriate these amounts directly to the Coast Guard. 
The Committee continues this practice and urges the 
Administration to budget for Coast Guard overseas contingency 
operations under the Department of Homeland Security in future 
budget requests. The Coast Guard shall brief the Committee no 
later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this act on 
any changes expected during fiscal year 2014 or projected 
transition costs expected in fiscal year 2015 to support 
overseas contingency operations.

                        OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS

    High Endurance Cutters.--The budget request proposes to 
decommission two high endurance cutters [HECs] and 368 
associated billets. These cutters average 46 years in age and 
have become increasingly unreliable. The Committee, however, is 
concerned that the decommissioning of two cutters in fiscal 
year 2014 would result in a significant cutter hour gap before 
new National Security Cutters [NSCs] are delivered to replace 
them. To date, four HECs have been decommissioned and the Coast 
Guard has delivered three NSCs. The fourth NSC is under 
production and scheduled for delivery in late fiscal year 2014 
and the fifth NSC is under contract and scheduled for delivery 
in fiscal year 2015. Historically, HECs provide the greatest 
resource hour contribution to the counterdrug mission, both in 
the Eastern Pacific and Western Hemisphere. In fiscal year 
2012, the Coast Guard seized 107 metric tons of cocaine, more 
than all other Federal agencies combined. The proposed 
reduction of two HECs with only one national security cutter 
delivered in fiscal year 2014 will result in a diminished 
presence and fewer opportunities for interdictions. Therefore, 
the recommendation includes an additional $8,000,000 and 184 
positions to maintain one of the two HECs proposed to be 
decommissioned in the request, saving 1,665 major cutter hours 
(3,330 hours annualized) that otherwise would have been cut.
    HC-C130H.--The budget request proposes to eliminate two of 
the Coast Guard's aging HC-C130H aircraft, resulting in a 
reduction of 800 Long Range Surveillance Maritime Patrol 
Aircraft [MPA] resources hours in fiscal year 2014 (1,600 hours 
annualized). These MPAs support several mission areas for the 
Coast Guard, including counter drug, migrant interdiction, 
living marine resources, port and coastal security, law 
enforcement, and search and rescue. While these aircraft 
average 28 years and have become increasingly difficult to 
maintain and sustain operationally, the Coast Guard's MPA hour 
gap is already 19,000 hours below baseline requirements. The 
reduction of these aircraft will also result in reduced support 
to the Joint Interagency Task Force--South counter drug 
mission. While the Committee has funded a total of four new HC-
130Js in recent years, the first won't be ready for operations 
until 2016. Therefore, the recommendation includes an 
additional $8,000,000 and 58 positions to maintain these two 
aircraft in fiscal year 2014.
    Training.--The Committee is concerned with the proposal in 
the budget request to reduce funding for training by 
$43,200,000 in fiscal year 2014. Coast Guard mission 
requirements encompass a diverse set of responsibilities, such 
as: search and rescue, drug interdiction, migrant interdiction, 
icebreaking, and port security. The men and women of the Coast 
Guard depend on tailored attention to their specific 
professional development needs in order to perform the 
assignments demanded of them by each unique Coast Guard 
mission. While budget caps require all agencies to find 
efficiencies and cut back on certain programs, this deep cut to 
the training budget will result in personnel arriving at new 
duty stations without the requisite expertise and skills, will 
limit the Coast Guard's capacity to handle a surge in workforce 
levels, and will reduce tuition assistance that is used to grow 
a highly educated workforce. The recommendation includes an 
additional $22,000,000 and 200 positions above the request to 
restore the most critical training funds.

                     FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT

    The bill includes $29,548,000 for financial systems 
modernization to replace the Coast Guard's core accounting 
system, which is resource intensive and non-compliant with the 
Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996. The Coast 
Guard, in tandem with the Office of the Chief Financial 
Officer, shall continue to brief the Committee on its efforts 
to carry out this migration.

                       HEADQUARTERS CONSOLIDATION

    The bill includes $12,800,000 for costs necessary to 
support the Coast Guard at the St. Elizabeths campus, including 
requirements for security services and technology integration 
operations. Funding for these activities is included in the 
Coast Guard instead of Departmental Operations because the 
Coast Guard will be the sole tenant at the campus in fiscal 
year 2014.

                             SEXUAL ASSAULT

    Like other military branches, the Coast Guard continues to 
struggle with sexual assault within its ranks. The Coast Guard 
had 141 incident reports of sexual assaults in fiscal year 
2012, up from 83 in fiscal year 2011 and 75 in fiscal year 
2010. While the Coast Guard has enhanced training and awareness 
throughout the service in recent years, much more needs to be 
done to prevent and stop these incidents. The Committee notes 
that the Coast Guard has just one permanent headquarters staff 
billet within the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response [SAPR] 
program while the field is served by collateral duty sexual 
assault response coordinators. In order to strengthen the Coast 
Guard's SAPR program and establish a permanent infrastructure 
in the field, the Committee includes $1,000,000 for six 
regional coordinators, which will allow for a full range of 
prevention strategies to be deployed, establishment of sexual 
assault response teams in every region, and additional training 
to expand the number of victim advocates across the widely 
dispersed population of the Coast Guard.
    The Committee also commends the Coast Guard for its 
commitment to align its policies to ensure its servicemembers 
are afforded the protections provided by the Defense STRONG Act 
as enacted by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2012, (Public Law 112-81). The Coast Guard shall report to 
the Committee on the implementation status of these new 
policies within 60 days of the date of enactment of this act.
    The Coast Guard shall also provide to the Committee the 
annual report required by section 217 of the Coast Guard 
Authorization Act of 2010.

                                HOUSING

    The Coast Guard recently completed a National Housing 
Assessment of its approximately 4,000 housing units in 128 
sites to determine if the inventory is appropriate, assess the 
condition of inventory, and to pinpoint key investment 
priorities. Overall, the inventory is over 40 years in age on 
average, with several maintenance and safety deficiencies at 
many locations. The report found that the Coast Guard has the 
potential to divest housing in underutilized areas thereby 
reducing its inventory and re-focusing its resources on 
maintenance at sites found to be in the worst condition and to 
invest in remote areas where limited housing is required. For 
existing housing, the report emphasized the need to improve 
maintenance delivery by establishing regional maintenance 
contracts, realign and train existing maintenance personnel, 
and strengthen investment above normally programmed resources, 
which were found to be insufficient to improve the condition of 
remaining housing to satisfactory levels. The Committee 
realizes that the issues identified by the report cannot be 
resolved overnight, but the Coast Guard must have a 
comprehensive plan to tackle these issues in an orderly and 
timely manner. The Committee directs the Coast Guard to submit 
an annual report with the budget request detailing how the 
deficiencies identified in the report have been resolved or 
plan to be resolved in the upcoming year. The report shall 
include progress made in: resolving housing identified as 
inadequate from a health and safety concern; right-sizing the 
housing inventory; the development of regional maintenance 
contracts; and addressing the need for new housing. Finally, 
the report shall also identify how operational maintenance 
funds for divested housing are being reinvested into the most 
critical housing needs in the remaining inventory.

                       MINOR SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE

    The bill includes long standing bill language to allow 
funds from the ``Operating Expenses'' appropriation to be used 
for the sustainment, repair, replacement and maintenance of 
shore infrastructure, including projects to correct 
deficiencies for code compliance or that threaten life, health, 
or safety to an amount not exceeding 50 percent of a building's 
or structure's replacement value. Additionally, ``Operating 
Expenses'' funds are allowed to be used for contingent, 
emergent, or other unspecified minor construction projects, 
which includes new construction, procurement, development, 
conversion, rebuilding, improvement, or an extension of any 
facility not exceeding $1,000,000 in total costs at any 
location for planned or unplanned operational needs.
    Minor construction projects funded from the ``Operating 
Expenses'' appropriation can be combined with depot level 
maintenance projects for the sake of administrative and 
economic efficiency. The Coast Guard is to provide a report to 
the Committee not later than 45 days after the date of 
enactment of this act detailing such projects and any 
sustainment, repair, replacement or maintenance projects over 
$1,000,000 for fiscal year 2014. For fiscal year 2015, such 
information shall be included in the congressional budget 
justification.

                              SMALL BOATS

    The bill includes long standing bill language to allow 
funds from the ``Operating Expenses'' appropriation to be used 
for the purchase or lease of small boats for contingent and 
emergent requirements (at a unit cost of no more than $700,000) 
and repairs and service-life replacements. The annual cost of 
these activities is capped at $31,000,000. Unlike major 
procurements requested in the ``Acquisition, Construction, and 
Improvements'' appropriation, the Coast Guard's annual request 
for the ``Operating Expenses'' appropriation includes minimal 
information about the budget for small boat activities. In 
order to gain more clarity on these matters, the Coast Guard is 
to provide a report to the Committee no later than 30 days 
after the date of enactment of this act detailing planned small 
boat purchases, leases, repairs, and service life replacements 
for fiscal year 2014. For fiscal year 2015, such information 
shall be included in the congressional budget justification.

                          REPROGRAMMING LIMIT

    The budget request included a proposed adjustment to the 
Coast Guard's reprogramming limit in order to help with the 
internal management of highly volatile expenditures in the 
Military Pay and Allowances PPA. A significant portion of the 
Coast Guard's Military Pay and Allowances PPA is entitlement 
driven, such as allowances for housing, Permanent Change of 
Station [PCS] Expenses and Active Duty and Dependent Medical 
costs. Actual rates for these costs can vary greatly in the 2 
year span between budget formulation and enactment of the Coast 
Guard's ``Operating Expenses'' appropriation. Macroeconomic 
events, such as medical cost inflation or changes in TRICARE 
fees under the National Defense Authorization Act, housing 
market trends, and PCS household goods carrier charges can vary 
greatly during this time. In addition, payments for PCS moves 
are highly dependent on fuel prices. Similar to housing costs, 
fuel prices can vary significantly between the time the budget 
is formulated and executed.
    While the Coast Guard should be making every effort to 
implement financial management measures to ensure accurate 
budget requests, the Committee understands certain price 
adjustments are inevitable that will impact the budget 
estimates contained within them. As a result of this 
variability, the Coast Guard has found itself in a position 
over the past few years with high unobligated balances in its 
Military Pay and Allowances PPA with limited flexibility to 
reallocate those funds for other worthy activities, such as 
depot level maintenance for aging ships and planes or to 
sustain operational tempo for Coast Guard missions. To address 
this situation, the bill includes a modified version of the 
request to enable better stewardship of Federal resources. The 
notification requirements contained in section 503 of this act 
are to apply to any reprogramming made under this authority.

                          LEGACY PATROL BOATS

    A total of six fast response cutters [FRCs] are funded 
within the ``Acquisition, Construction, and Improvements'' 
appropriation, four boats and $235,000,000 above the request. 
This will bring the total amount funded to 30 boats, 12 of 
which will be in-service by the end of 2014. FRCs are replacing 
aging 110-foot Island Class Patrol Boats, which are already 
beyond the end of their projected service lives and very 
expensive to maintain. The Committee has learned that two of 
these patrol boats have such severe hull deterioration, it has 
become cost prohibitive to maintain them beyond fiscal year 
2013. Given the fact that the bill increases the number of new 
patrol boats by four, providing for 10,000 additional 
operational hours, the Committee expects the Coast Guard to 
decommission two legacy patrol boats that are in the worst 
material condition, achieving savings of $2,763,000.

                    PUBLIC-PRIVATE HOUSING AUTHORITY

    The Committee is aware the public-private authority 
provided to the Department of Defense in the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 has resulted in improved 
housing for military families. The authority provided allows 
the Department to work with the private sector to build and 
renovate housing through a variety of financial tools, 
including: direct loans, loan guarantees, equity investment and 
conveyance or leasing of existing properties and facilities. 
The Committee believes similar authorization for the Coast 
Guard may benefit the agency and members and families of the 
Coast Guard. Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary to 
provide a report to the Committee not later than 90 days after 
enactment of this act analyzing the potential benefits of 
public-private housing authority for the Coast Guard.

         INFRASTRUCTURE AND RESPONSE CAPABILITIES IN THE ARCTIC

    The Committee is concerned about the lack of assets 
available for the Coast Guard's Arctic mission. No later than 
120 days after the date of enactment of this act, the 
Commandant is directed to submit a report to the Committee 
comparing the costs of facility renovations to homeport and 
support an NSC in Alaska with the annual costs of transit time 
to Alaska area of operations for deployments and days lost to 
casualty repairs.

                            ARCTIC STRATEGY

    The Coast Guard recently released its Arctic Strategy, 
which looks at the changing conditions in the region and 
contemplates future requirements. The strategy outlines three 
broad objectives: improving awareness; modernizing governance; 
and broadening partnerships. To carry out these objectives over 
the long term, the Coast Guard next needs to develop an 
implementation plan, including the identification of necessary 
capabilities, requirements, authorities, and resources. 
Therefore, the Coast Guard is directed to submit an Arctic 
strategy implementation plan no later than 120 days after the 
date of enactment of this act.

                  INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION

    The Committee wants to ensure that as activities in the 
Arctic expand, necessary response capabilities exists in the 
region. No later than 90 days after the date of enactment of 
this act, the Secretary is directed to submit a report to the 
Committee on activities that have occurred pursuant to section 
307(b) of Public Law 111-281 and how the Department is meeting 
the requirements being developed in the agreements envisioned 
by that subsection.

                            COAST GUARD YARD

    The Committee recognizes the Coast Guard Yard at Curtis 
Bay, Maryland, is a critical component of the Coast Guard's 
core logistics capability which directly supports fleet 
readiness. The Committee further recognizes the Yard has been a 
vital part of the Coast Guard's readiness and infrastructure 
for more than 100 years and believes that sufficient industrial 
work should be assigned to the Yard to maintain this 
capability.

                   EXECUTIVE TRANSPORTATION AIRCRAFT

    The Coast Guard is directed to notify the Committee prior 
to making any changes in the type or number of the command and 
control aircraft.

                 COAST GUARD DEFENSE RELATED ACTIVITIES

    Since 2001, the Coast Guard has derived $340,000,000 
(excluding overseas contingency operations) of its annual 
``Operating Expenses'' appropriation for defense related 
activities. This number has remained relatively constant for 
more than a decade despite the Coast Guard's budget growing by 
225 percent over that same period of time. Moreover, all Coast 
Guard appropriations play a vital role in ensuring the Service 
can execute its defense related missions, yet, only the 
``Operating Expenses'' appropriation derives any defense 
related funding. The Committee is concerned that this level and 
allocation of funding may not adequately reflect the estimated 
$800,000,000 or more the Coast Guard spends annually to meet 
its defense related missions. The Committee directs the Coast 
Guard to provide an analysis of all defense related expenses 
within its appropriations, using the April 1998 GAO Report on 
U.S. Coast Guard Use of DOD Funds for National Security 
Functions as the basis for defining National Security 
Functions. The report should identify the current allocation of 
the $340,000,000 within the ``Operating Expenses'' 
appropriation, shortfalls between that amount and amounts 
actually spent for defense related activities, and any defense 
related costs being incurred by other Coast Guard 
appropriations. The results of the analysis are to be shared 
with the House and Senate Committees on Budget, the 
Congressional Budget Office, and the Office of Management and 
Budget, no later than November 1, 2013. The results shall also 
be reflected in the President's budget submission for fiscal 
year 2015.

                ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND RESTORATION

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     $13,134,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      13,187,000
House allowance.........................................      13,164,000
Committee recommendation................................      13,165,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Environmental Compliance and Restoration account 
provides funds to address environmental problems at former and 
current Coast Guard units as required by applicable Federal, 
State, and local environmental laws and regulations. Planned 
expenditures for these funds include major upgrades to 
petroleum and regulated substance storage tanks, restoration of 
contaminated ground water and soils, remediation efforts at 
hazardous substance disposal sites, and initial site surveys 
and actions necessary to bring Coast Guard shore facilities and 
vessels into compliance with environmental laws and 
regulations.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $13,165,000 for Environmental 
Compliance and Restoration activities. This is $22,000 below 
the amount requested and $31,000 above the amount provided in 
fiscal year 2013.
    The Coast Guard is directed to include in its annual budget 
justification a listing of the activities projected to be 
funded by the amount requested under this heading and an 
updated backlog report for Environmental Compliance and 
Restoration projects, with an explanation of how the amount 
requested will impact this documented backlog.

                            RESERVE TRAINING

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $132,353,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     109,543,000
House allowance.........................................     112,991,000
Committee recommendation................................     122,491,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Reserve Training appropriation provides for the 
training of qualified individuals who are available for Active 
Duty in time of war or national emergency or to augment regular 
Coast Guard forces in the performance of peacetime missions.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $122,491,000 for Reserve Training. 
This is $12,948,000 above the amount requested and $9,862,000 
below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    The budget request includes a reduction of $24,735,000 and 
the transfer of 1,050 drilling Selected Reservist positions to 
the Inactive Ready Reserve, which would result in the smallest 
Coast Guard Reserve force since 1957. If enacted, the reduction 
would impact the Coast Guard's ability to respond to major 
events, such as a hurricane, mass migration, oil spill, or 
earthquake. At the requested funding levels, certain 
specialized reserve forces would not be able to drill as 
frequently, impacting proficiency. Therefore, the Committee 
recommendation includes $13,000,000 above the request to 
restore 600 reservists to active status, which will enable the 
Coast Guard to retain the majority of the first responders 
proposed for reduction, such as boat coxswains, law enforcement 
personnel, and pollution response technicians.

              ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, AND IMPROVEMENTS

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\..............................  $1,817,586,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     951,116,000
House allowance.........................................   1,222,712,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,229,684,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $274,233,000 in the Disaster Relief 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

    Funding in this account supports the Acquisition, 
Construction, and Improvement [AC&I] of vessels, aircraft, 
information management resources, shore facilities, aids to 
navigation, and military housing required to execute the Coast 
Guard's missions and achieve its performance goals.
    Vessels.--The vessel program provides funding to 
recapitalize and/or improve the Coast Guard's fleet of aging 
boats and cutters.
    Aircraft.--The aircraft program is the primary 
recapitalization and sustainment effort for the Coast Guard's 
aging aircraft.
    Other Equipment.--The Coast Guard invests in numerous 
management information and decision support systems that will 
result in increased efficiencies, including Rescue 21 (formerly 
the National Distress and Response System Modernization 
Project), and the Nationwide Automatic Identification System.
    Shore Facilities and Aids to Navigation.--The Coast Guard 
invests in the acquisition, construction, rebuilding, and 
improvement of shore facilities, aids to navigation, and 
related equipment.
    Military Housing.--The Coast Guard invests in Military 
Housing facilities to ensure military members have access to 
housing in areas where there is a lack of affordable 
accommodations.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $1,229,684,000 for Acquisition, 
Construction, and Improvements, including $20,000,000 from the 
Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. This is $278,568,000 above the 
amount requested and $587,902,000 below the amount provided in 
fiscal year 2013.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                   ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, AND IMPROVEMENTS
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                              enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vessels:
    Survey and Design--Vessel and Boats..................            $2,497            $1,000            $1,000
    Response Boat Medium.................................             7,989  ................            10,000
    In-Service Cutter Sustainment........................  ................            21,000            21,000
    National Security Cutter.............................           678,404           616,000           632,000
    Offshore Patrol Cutter...............................            29,960            25,000            25,000
    Fast Response Cutter.................................           334,558            75,000           310,000
    Cutter Boats.........................................             3,995             3,000             3,000
    Medium Endurance Cutter Sustainment..................            15,979  ................  .................
    Polar Icebreaking Vessel.............................             7,989             2,000             2,000
                                                          ------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Vessels..................................         1,081,371           743,000         1,004,000
                                                          ======================================================
Aircraft:
    CGNR 6017 Airframe Replacement.......................            13,982  ................  .................
    Maritime Patrol Aircraft.............................            54,927  ................  .................
    Long Range Surveillance Aircraft.....................            89,881            16,000            16,000
    HH-65 Conversion/Sustainment Projects................            31,458            12,000            12,000
                                                          ------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Aircraft.................................           190,248            28,000            28,000
                                                          ======================================================
Other Acquisition Programs:
    Program Oversight and Management.....................            14,980            10,000            10,000
    Systems Engineering and Integration..................  ................               204               204
    C4ISR................................................            40,447            35,226            35,226
    CG-Logistics Information Management System  [CG-LIMS]             2,497             1,500             1,500
    National Automatic Identification System.............             5,992            13,000            13,000
                                                          ------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Other Acquisition Programs...............            63,916            59,930            59,930
                                                          ======================================================
Shore Facilities and Aids to Navigation:
    Major Construction, ATON, and Survey and Design......            29,960             2,000             2,000
    Major Acquisition Systems Infrastructure.............            49,346  ................  .................
    Minor Shore..........................................             4,993             3,000             3,000
                                                          ------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Shore Facilities and Aids to Navigation..            84,299             5,000             5,000
                                                          ======================================================
Military Housing.........................................             9,987  ................            18,000
Personnel and Related Support:
    Direct Personnel Costs...............................           112,933           114,747           114,315
    Core Acquisition Costs...............................               599               439               439
                                                          ------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Personnel and Related Support............           113,532           115,186           114,754
                                                          ======================================================
Emergency Appropriations (Public Law 113-2)..............           274,233  ................  .................
                                                          ------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Acquisition, Construction, and Improvements.         1,817,586           951,116         1,229,684
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                        CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN

    The Capital Investment Plan [CIP] is essential for the 
Committee to carry out its oversight function of the Coast 
Guard, especially at a time when recapitalization of aging 
assets has become so critical for the service. All of the 
information required by the Committee is in accordance with the 
Coast Guard's Major Systems Acquisition Manual and applicable 
Department of Homeland Security management directives. The 
fiscal year 2015-2019 plan is to be submitted with the fiscal 
year 2015 congressional justification. To encourage a timely 
submission, the Committee has withheld $75,000,000 from the 
Headquarters Directorate of the Coast Guard. This withholding 
also reflects the Committee's disappointment that the Coast 
Guard did not comply with all statutory requirements in its 
submission of the 2014-2018 CIP. Of note, while the CIP 
submitted with the fiscal year 2013 budget request anticipated 
acquisition expenditures totaling $1,429,485,000; with the 
submission of the fiscal year 2014 budget request, these 
expenditures decreased by $478,369,000. The ramifications of 
these types of budgetary swings are far reaching. The current 
plan failed to explain any deviations in cost, performance 
parameters, schedule, or estimated date of completion from the 
original acquisition program to the current plan. The Coast 
Guard needs to make every effort to clearly identify which 
procurements will be delayed or scaled back, which ones will be 
canceled, which ones will remain on track, and the impact these 
decisions have on extending the service life of the Coast 
Guard's already aging and unreliable fleet and shore 
facilities. The Committee expects this level of transparency in 
the CIP accompanying the fiscal year 2015 budget request.

                      ACQUISITION PORTFOLIO REVIEW

    The fiscal year 2014 CIP that was submitted to the 
Committee on April 19, 2013, calls for a radical change to 
Coast Guard recapitalization efforts in future years. The 
funding levels suggested in the plan would decrease the number 
of fast response cutters to a level that jeopardizes the 
program, stop the acquisition of new aircraft, delay completion 
of the offshore patrol cutter, put the acquisition of a new 
polar icebreaker at risk, and scale back investment in 
deteriorating shore facilities. If enacted, this investment 
plan would have dire consequences on the Coast Guard's ability 
to carry out its missions, such as: interdicting drugs in the 
transit zone; managing a mass migration event; responding to 
oil spills; fisheries enforcement; and the need to increase 
U.S. presence in the Arctic. The CIP states that DHS will 
conduct a comprehensive portfolio review in 2013 that will help 
develop revised acquisition program baselines and direct key 
acquisition decision events to reflect acquisition priorities 
and operational requirements achievable within the funding 
projections contained in the fiscal year 2014 CIP. A major flaw 
in the fiscal year 2014 CIP is the Department's conclusion that 
the funding levels it contains for the ``Acquisition, 
Construction, and Improvements'' appropriation are consistent 
with the pre-sequester caps imposed on discretionary budget 
authority through 2021 under the Budget Control Act of 2011. 
The reality is that the fiscal year 2014 budget request for the 
``Acquisition, Construction, and Improvements'' appropriation 
is 38 percent below the fiscal year 2013 enacted level, after 
factoring out emergency supplemental funding, while total 
discretionary spending under the Budget Control Act of 2011 
increases by 1.4 percent between fiscal year 2013 and fiscal 
year 2014. In conducting the portfolio review described in the 
CIP, the Department shall use more appropriate outyear funding 
levels that are reflective of the fiscal year 2013 enacted 
level for the ``Acquisition, Construction, and Improvements'' 
appropriation, as adjusted by the pre-sequester caps set in the 
Budget Control Act of 2011. Finally, the review is to include 
acquisition cost, asset capability and quantity tradeoffs, and 
the overall impact to the Coast Guard's ability to carry out 
all of its statutory missions. The results of the review shall 
be validated by an independent third party selected by the 
Secretary and the Commandant to ensure that a realistic budget 
outlook does not censor necessary data on mission needs and 
tradeoffs. The report by the independent third party shall be 
provided to the Committee in conjunction with the President's 
fiscal year 2015 budget request.

                    QUARTERLY ACQUISITION BRIEFINGS

    The Coast Guard is to continue quarterly briefings on all 
major acquisitions. In addition to the information normally 
provided for each asset, these briefings shall include: the top 
five risks for each acquisition, if applicable, consistent with 
those on the risk watch list in quarterly program manager 
reports, and if the risks have future budget implications; the 
objective for operational hours the Coast Guard expects to 
achieve; the gap between that objective, current capabilities, 
and stated mission requirements; and how the acquisition of the 
specific asset closes the gap. The information presented at 
these briefings shall also include a discussion of how the 
Coast Guard calculated the operational hours, an explanation on 
risks to mission performance associated with the current 
shortfall, and the operational strategy to mitigate such risks. 
Finally, the briefings are to include a status chart on all 
shore construction projects that have not been completed. For 
each construction project, the chart is to include the funding 
status, design status, and procurement and construction status.

                          RESPONSE BOAT-MEDIUM

    The Committee recommends $10,000,000 for the Response Boat-
Medium [RB-M] acquisition. The Committee disagrees with the 
request to end RB-M production 10 boats short of the 180 boats 
required to complete the program. The RB-Ms are meeting or 
exceeding all performance expectations; and there is a 
demonstrated requirement for the remaining boats. To date, 128 
RB-Ms have been delivered on time and on budget. These funds 
will allow the Coast Guard to purchase 4 RB-Ms in fiscal year 
2014, bringing the total funded to 174 of the required 180 
boats. The RB-M is a critical asset for the Coast Guard to 
replace aging 41-foot Utility Boats that are less able to 
handle Coast Guard mission requirements, particularly maritime 
security requirements that have changed significantly since 
September 11, 2001. With the acquisition of RB-Ms, the Coast 
Guard will be able to perform its duties more efficiently by 
allowing crews, for example, to be onsite to a rescue more 
quickly. The RB-Ms serve as an ideal platform for search and 
rescue; ports, waterways, and coastal security; drug 
interdiction; and migrant interdiction. Further, the RB-M 
supports marine safety, aids to navigation, marine 
environmental protection, and defense readiness missions.

                     IN-SERVICE CUTTER SUSTAINMENT

    The bill includes $21,000,000, as requested, to continue 
in-service sustainment efforts for the 140-icebreaking tugs, 
begin mid-life service sustainment of the 225-foot ocean-going 
buoy tender, and fund the first of four phases of the CGC EAGLE 
service life extension. Given the success of the Mission 
Effectiveness Projects for the medium endurance cutters and the 
110-foot patrol boats at the Coast Guard Yard, the Committee 
expects the Coast Guard to direct sustainment work on all aging 
vessels there when geographically feasible.

                        NATIONAL SECURITY CUTTER

    The Coast Guard operates a fleet of 378-foot high endurance 
cutters [HECs] that are over 43 years old on average, and are 
increasingly unreliable and expensive to maintain. By 
comparison, the average Navy ship is 20 years old. The Coast 
Guard's program of record is to acquire 8 national security 
cutters [NSCs] to replace 12 HECs (of which 3 have been 
decommissioned with the arrival of the first 3 NSCs). To date, 
approximately $3,848,000,000 has been appropriated for six NSCs 
and long lead time materials [LLTM] for NSC-7. Three NSCs have 
been delivered to the Coast Guard, the fourth is expected to be 
delivered in fiscal year 2014, the fifth in fiscal year 2015, 
and the sixth in 2017.
    As noted in prior years, the Committee strongly supports 
the procurement of one national security cutter per year until 
all eight planned ships are procured. The continuation of 
production without a break will ensure that these ships, which 
are vital to the Coast Guard's mission, are procured at the 
lowest cost, and that they enter the Coast Guard fleet as soon 
as possible. The Committee is concerned that the 
Administration's current acquisition policy requires the Coast 
Guard to attain total acquisition cost for a vessel, including 
long lead time materials, production costs, and post-production 
costs, before a production contract can be awarded. This has 
the potential to create shipbuilding inefficiencies, force 
delayed obligation of production funds, and require 
postproduction funds far in advance of when they will be used. 
As an example of such inefficiency, the fiscal year 2013 budget 
request proposed a rescission and reappropriation of 
$25,000,000 in funds previously appropriated for NSC-4 post-
production that would have expired before they could be spent. 
The Department should be in a position to acquire NSCs in the 
most efficient manner within the guidelines of strict 
governance measures. Therefore, the Committee includes language 
in the bill specifying that funds made available by this act 
shall be available to contract for long lead time materials for 
Coast Guard vessels, notwithstanding the availability of funds 
for production costs or post-production costs.
    For NSC-7, the Committee includes $12,000,000 for Segment 2 
of LLTM. The Committee recommendation also includes 
$540,000,000, as requested, for production and $3,000,000 for 
post-production costs. Funding for post-production costs is 
$61,000,000 below the request due to the fact that these funds 
are not necessary until fiscal years 2016 through 2018.
    The request includes no funding for LLTM for NSC-8. The 
Committee disagrees with this proposal. Procuring these 
materials in advance will save substantial time and money by 
ensuring that supplies and components that require a long time 
to obtain are available to the manufacturer when they are 
needed. By providing LLTM for NSC-6 in advance, the Coast Guard 
was able to save $30,000,000 in the total cost of the ship. 
Therefore the bill includes $77,000,000 for LLTM for NSC-8. 
According to the Department, this will accelerate the 
production schedule for the cutter and result in direct savings 
of up to $40,000,000 compared to delaying long lead acquisition 
to fiscal year 2015.

                          FAST RESPONSE CUTTER

    The Committee recommends $310,000,000 for the Coast Guard's 
Fast Response Cutter [FRC]. This funding will allow the Coast 
Guard to acquire six FRC hulls (25-30). Procuring six FRCs in 
fiscal year 2014 will maximize the production line and generate 
cost savings of at least $5,000,000 per hull for a total 
savings to the taxpayers of $30,000,000. Funding six boats 
instead of two will also allow the Coast Guard to advance the 
replacement of the aging 110-foot island class patrol boats, 
which are already beyond the end of their projected service 
lives and very expensive to maintain. Each FRC will provide 
2,500 annual operating hours and improved sea keeping ability, 
resulting in better habitability and full-mission capability in 
higher sea states.

                         OFFSHORE PATROL CUTTER

    The recommendation includes $25,000,000 for the Offshore 
Patrol Cutter [OPC], as requested. Funding is provided for pre-
acquisition design work of the OPC, which is intended to 
replace the Coast Guard's aging fleet of medium endurance 
cutters. The Coast Guard expects to award preliminary and 
contract designs to three competing contractors in fiscal year 
2013. A final detailed design and construction award is 
expected in fiscal year 2016.
    The OPC's initial capabilities to control and direct 
aircraft as well as execute interdiction missions should, to 
the maximum extent feasible, be equivalent to that of the NSC 
to facilitate maximum savings to the Federal Government, rather 
than being deferred to future upgrades that add to total cost 
of ownership. The Committee urges the Coast Guard to maximize, 
to the greatest extent practicable, such systems' commonality 
between the OPC and the NSC to reduce total acquisition cost 
and lifecycle costs facilitated by savings in life cycle 
logistics management, integration costs, and personnel training 
efficiencies.

                            POLAR ICEBREAKER

    The recommendation includes $2,000,000, as requested, to 
continue survey and design activities for a new Coast Guard 
polar icebreaker.
    The Committee notes that the Coast Guard's High Latitude 
Study calls for a minimum of three new heavy polar icebreakers. 
Currently, the service only has one working icebreaker, the 
Healy, which is a medium service ship that is used primarily 
for scientific missions in the Arctic. One of the Coast Guard's 
two heavy icebreakers, the 37 year-old Polar Star, is being 
refurbished and reactivated in fiscal year 2013 to provide 
capability for another 7 to 10 years. The service's other heavy 
icebreaker, the 35-year-old Polar Sea, is out of service based 
on its mechanical state and cost to repair.
    The Coast Guard estimates that construction of a new 
icebreaker will not be completed until 2024 and that the vessel 
will not be fully ready for operations until 2026 or 2027. 
Given the importance of this polar icebreaking capacity to 
facilitate Arctic shipping, fisheries, and energy development 
in the United States, the Coast Guard must accelerate the 
development of operational requirements for the vessel, ensure 
the capacity and viability of the industrial base, and explore 
alternative acquisition strategies that may be more expeditious 
and cost effective, including the use of parent-craft designs 
or leasing options, to support this critical mission 
requirement.
    The Coast Guard's Alternatives Analysis for the acquisition 
of a heavy polar icebreaker is to include: (1) an examination 
of existing heavy polar icebreaker parent craft designs that 
could potentially be utilized; (2) specific recommendations to 
expedite the acquisition schedule; and (3) an updated 
budgetary, market, operational, and legal analysis of 
alternative acquisition arrangements for a heavy polar 
icebreaker, including various forms of vessel leasing such as 
those used by the United States Navy, the National Science 
Foundation, other Federal agencies, and the domestic maritime 
industry. The report shall include a consideration of pre-
determined, fixed-price, long-term leasing arrangements, demise 
charters, and contractor-owned, contractor-operated charters, 
as well as the use of appropriate contract incentives and 
penalties that have the potential to expedite construction 
while ensuring vessel performance and durability. The report 
shall also include an examination of potential costs and 
savings to the Federal Government over the next 10, 20, and 30 
year periods using various types of leasing arrangements as 
compared to a Government owned vessel, including potential 
savings that may result from contractor assumption of financial 
responsibility for maintenance costs (at the Coast Guard's 
direction) and potential savings that may result from 
contractor assumption of personnel costs for certain positions 
that do not exercise any combat or law enforcement functions 
(including associated savings to the Federal Government from 
reduced training requirements). The Alternatives Analysis is to 
be submitted to the Committee not later than 15 days after it 
is completed.

                       UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

    The Committee is aware of efforts by the Coast Guard to 
evaluate both ship-based and land-based unmanned aircraft 
systems [UAS] for mission requirements. Both platforms have the 
potential to enhance the Coast Guard's capability to execute 
statutory requirements in the maritime domain. The Coast Guard 
has reported to the Committee that its long standing plan to 
add vertical take-off unmanned aircraft systems to National 
Security Cutters would result in an estimated 95- to 225-
percent increase in surveillance coverage within an 80 nautical 
mile radius of the cutter and an estimated 95-percent increase 
in the number of prosecutions achieved by the cutter. The 
Committee continues to be very supportive of the use of 
vertical take-off UAS aboard Coast Guard cutters and strongly 
encourages the Coast Guard to ensure that the testing and 
evaluation schedule is not delayed for this enhanced 
surveillance capability.
    The Coast Guard continues to pursue a small UAS [sUAS] as 
an interim capability for the NSC. Demonstrations are planned 
in 2013 and 2014 to evaluate its usefulness in sending data 
from the sUAS sensors to the NSC. The Coast Guard is to keep 
the Committee apprised of its efforts for vertical take-off 
UAS, sUAS, and land-based UAS development.

                SHORE FACILITIES AND AIDS TO NAVIGATION

    The Committee recommends $5,000,000 for shore facilities 
and aids to navigation, as requested. The Coast Guard's CIP for 
fiscal year 2015-2019 shall include a better explanation of the 
construction projects identified for funding, including: 
identification of each project to be funded in each fiscal 
year; an estimate for construction, design, planning, and 
project management for each project; and a schedule to complete 
the project.

                      COAST GUARD MILITARY HOUSING

    The Committee provides $18,000,000 above the request for 
the recapitalization, improvement, and acquisition of housing 
to support military families. Of this amount, $349,996 is 
derived from the Coast Guard Housing Fund. The Coast Guard 
shall provide an expenditure plan to the Committee for these 
funds in the shore facilities report required 45 days after the 
date of enactment of this act.

                             AC&I PERSONNEL

    The Committee provides $114,754,000 for personnel and 
related support, as requested.

                          UNFUNDED PRIORITIES

    The Committee directs the Commandant to provide to the 
Congress, at the time of the President's budget submission, a 
list of approved but unfunded Coast Guard priorities and the 
funds needed for each.

              RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     $19,664,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      19,856,000
House allowance.........................................       9,928,000
Committee recommendation................................      19,781,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Coast Guard's Research and Development program develops 
techniques, methods, hardware, and systems that directly 
contribute to increasing the productivity and effectiveness of 
the Coast Guard's operating missions. This account provides 
funds to operate and maintain the Coast Guard Research and 
Development Center.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $19,781,000 for the Coast Guard's 
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation activities. This is 
$75,000 below the amount requested and $117,000 above the 
amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    The Deepwater Horizon oil spill highlighted the need for 
improved basic oceanographic research and the research and 
development of new oil spill response and removal technologies. 
The Committee believes that innovative technologies, such an 
unmanned maritime vehicles [UMVs], can improve prediction 
accuracy for oil spill response efforts through better 
trajectory models, provide real-time data telemetry, and reduce 
operational response costs. Of the funds available for 
``Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation,'' the 
Committee directs the Commandant to study the viability and 
applicability of persistent UMVs and other cost-saving maritime 
technologies through a competitive process. This assessment 
should consider technologies that complement and enhance the 
Coast Guard's marine environmental protection capabilities, and 
emphasis shall be given to technologies which also have 
potential applications for other Coast Guard missions, such as 
search and rescue; port, waterways, and coastal security; 
marine debris removal; drug interdiction; and migrant 
interdiction.

                              RETIRED PAY

Appropriations, 2013....................................  $1,423,000,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................   1,460,000,000
House allowance.........................................   1,460,000,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,460,000,000

    This account provides for the retired pay of military 
personnel of the Coast Guard and Coast Guard Reserve, members 
of the former Lighthouse Service, and for annuities payable to 
beneficiaries of retired military personnel under the retired 
serviceman's family protection plan (10 U.S.C. 1431-1446) and 
survivor benefit plan (10 U.S.C. 1447-1455); payments for 
career status bonuses under the National Defense Authorization 
Act; and payments for medical care of retired personnel and 
their dependents under the Dependents Medical Care Act (10 
U.S.C., ch. 55).

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $1,460,000,000 for Retired Pay. 
This is the same amount as requested and $37,000,000 above the 
amount provided in fiscal year 2013.

                      United States Secret Service

                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\..............................  $1,554,161,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................   1,494,614,000
House allowance.........................................   1,534,589,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,529,902,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $300,000 in the Disaster Relief 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

    The United States Secret Service's [USSS] Salaries and 
Expenses appropriation provides funds for the security of the 
President, the Vice President, and other dignitaries and 
designated individuals; for enforcement of laws relating to 
obligations and securities of the United States and laws 
relating to financial crimes, that include, but are not limited 
to, access device fraud, financial institution fraud, identity 
theft, and computer fraud; and computer-based attacks on 
financial, banking, and telecommunications infrastructure; and 
for protection of the White House and other buildings within 
the Washington, DC, metropolitan area. The agency also provides 
support for investigations related to missing and exploited 
children.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $1,529,902,000 for Salaries and 
Expenses. This is $35,288,000 above the amount requested and 
$24,259,000 below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                               UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE--SALARIES AND EXPENSES
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Fiscal year     Fiscal year
                                                                      2013         2014 budget      Committee
                                                                   enacted\1\        request     recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protection:
    Protection of persons and facilities.......................         854,107         822,591          846,662
    Protective intelligence activities.........................          68,035          67,782           67,165
    National Special Security Event Fund.......................           4,494           4,500            4,500
    Presidential candidate nominee protection..................          57,884  ..............  ...............
    White House mail screening\2\..............................  ..............          18,487  ...............
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Protection.....................................         984,520         913,360          918,327
                                                                ================================================
Investigations:
    Domestic field operations..................................         299,295         259,465          327,297
    International field office administration, operations, and           30,930          30,958           30,811
     train-  ing...............................................
    Electronic crimes special agent program and electronic       ..............          56,968  ...............
     crimes task forces\3\.....................................
    Support for missing and exploited children.................           8,355  ..............            8,366
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Investigations.................................         338,580         347,391          366,474
                                                                ================================================
Headquarters, management, and administration...................         174,104         177,282          188,964
Training: Rowley Training Center...............................          55,525          55,552           55,118
Information Integration and Technology Transformation..........           1,132           1,029            1,019
Emergency Appropriations (Public Law 113-2)....................             300  ..............  ...............
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
      Total, Salaries and expenses.............................       1,554,161       1,494,614        1,529,902
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.
\2\Funded under ``Protection of Persons and Facilities''.
\3\Funded under ``Domestic Field Operations''.

                       SECRET SERVICE ACTIVITIES

    The Committee fully funds the request for protection of 
persons and facilities, protective intelligence, and 
investigations. The Committee also fully funds the White House 
mail screening and the electronic crimes special agent program 
and electronic task force activities, but has moved the funds 
to the Protection of Persons and Facilities and Domestic Field 
Operations PPAs, respectively, consistent with the structure of 
the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2013.
    The President's budget proposed unacceptable cuts which 
would have a severely detrimental impact on the Secret 
Service's protection and investigation missions, as well as on 
agents and officers themselves. Included in the amount 
recommended for Protection of Persons and Facilities is 
$12,000,000 above the request and for Domestic Field Operations 
is $8,600,000 above the request to restore funding for critical 
Secret Service staffing. Additionally the bill includes 
$3,400,000 above the request for Headquarters, Management, and 
Administration to restore critical staffing and $9,600,000 
above the request for permanent change of station costs to 
ensure proper rotations of agents between the protective and 
investigative missions. This restoration will have a direct 
positive impact on agent safety.

           NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN

    The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, 
[NCMEC] was created in 1984 to serve as the Nation's resource 
on the issues of missing and sexually exploited children. For 
more than two decades, the Secret Service has provided funding 
for grants as well as computer forensic support to NCMEC. In 
fiscal year 2012, the $6,000,000 in grant funds provided to 
NCMEC constituted 12 percent of the Center's budget. Since 
1997, the Secret Service has assisted NCMEC by opening 2,320 
investigative cases throughout the Secret Services field 
offices. These cases resulted in 982 arrests of child predators 
and others, helped parents fingerprint and/or photograph more 
than 112,000 children through its Operation Safe Kids program, 
and completed 2,193 forensic/computer examinations for 
investigations involving missing and exploited children.
    For fiscal year 2014, the Committee recommends $6,000,000 
for grants in support of missing and exploited children and 
expects USSS to sustain forensic support at the fiscal year 
2013 level of $2,366,000.

                    NATIONAL SPECIAL SECURITY EVENTS

    The Committee recommends $4,500,000, as requested, for 
support to currently planned and unanticipated National Special 
Security Events [NSSEs] for fiscal year 2014. The Committee 
directs the USSS to provide semiannual briefings on the use of 
these funds, with the first briefing to occur not later than 
April 15, 2014. Also included in the bill is a general 
provision that states that none of the funds in this act may be 
used to reimburse any Federal department or agency for its 
participation in an NSSE.

           PROTECTIVE ACTIVITIES AND DOMESTIC INVESTIGATIONS

    The President's request includes modest increases for 
cybersecurity presidential protection measures and security 
enhancements for the White House complex. Additionally, while 
proposing a slight reduction to operational mission support, 
funding for these activities remain fairly robust. The 
Committee directs the Secret Service to provide a briefing on 
progress made in each of these areas not later than 180 days 
after the date of enactment of this act.

                  STATE AND LOCAL CYBERCRIME TRAINING

    The Committee recognizes the continuously changing nature 
of computer forensics and with that the need for evolving 
training at the State and local level, where 95 percent of 
criminal cases are investigated and prosecuted. The training 
provided by the Secret Service has proven invaluable to State 
and local law enforcement, prosecutors, and judges. The 
Committee also recognizes the growing positive training and 
educational relationship developed between the Secret Service 
and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Committee 
recommends that the Secret Service continue to robustly support 
this training and expand the number of people trained as well 
as the number of classes to address emerging areas of concern. 
These ongoing activities are achieving real results and the 
Committee includes $6,000,000 to continue this activity within 
the Secret Service rather than at the Federal Law Enforcement 
Training Center, as was proposed in the budget request. 
Further, the Committee directs the Secret Service to continue 
coordinating with the National Protection and Programs 
Directorate as the subject matter experts to ensure the 
curriculum is sound and consistent with current risk and 
threat, and to avoid duplication and ensure efficiency.

         INFORMATION INTEGRATION AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFORMATION

    The Committee notes the Secret Service, working closely 
with the DHS Chief Information Officer [CIO], has made great 
strides in implementing its information technology program and 
ensuring its modernization activities are consistent with the 
Department's guidance. The Committee discontinues its 
withholding of funds requirement and directs the Secret Service 
to brief the Committee on its ongoing progress with the DHS CIO 
not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this act.
    The Committee also directs the USSS to provide greater 
detail in the justifications accompanying the fiscal year 2015 
budget request on all USSS information technology activities.

                        INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES

    The Committee provided resources to support the opening of 
new international field offices in Lima, Peru, and Beijing, 
China, to stem counterfeiting activity and better facilitate 
protectee travel. The Committee also notes that ongoing 
cooperation with law enforcement officials in Colombia, Peru, 
and elsewhere is demonstrating continued success in suppressing 
counterfeiting operations around the world. For instance, in 
April of this year, Secret Service agents assisted their 
Peruvian National Police counterparts in seizing two commercial 
grade offset printing presses, one commercial grade plate 
burner, over 105 printing plates bearing counterfeit images of 
U.S. currency, original plates and transparencies for the 25198 
Peruvian Note, miscellaneous paraphernalia used in the printing 
of counterfeit currency, $5,600,000 in uncut sheets of 
counterfeit $100 and $10 U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, and 
$10,400,000 in counterfeit Peruvian currency. The Secret 
Service shall keep the Committee regularly apprised of its 
major international activities.

                        REPROGRAMMING THRESHOLDS

    Statutory language is included in the bill setting a higher 
threshold for the reprogramming of funds in section 503 of this 
act to accommodate unanticipated shifts in funding requirements 
for protection and investigation activities.

     ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENTS, AND RELATED EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     $56,675,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      51,775,000
House allowance.........................................      51,775,000
Committee recommendation................................      51,775,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    This appropriation provides funding for security upgrades 
of existing facilities; for information integration and 
technology transformation [IITT]; to continue development of 
the current master plan; to maintain and renovate existing 
facilities, including the James J. Rowley Training Center 
[Center]; and to ensure efficient and full utilization of the 
Center.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $51,775,000, as requested, for 
infrastructure improvements, IITT, and other activities. This 
is $4,900,000 below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. Of 
this amount, $5,380,000 is for facilities and $46,395,000 is 
for information integration and technology transformation.
    The Secret Service is directed to submit a multiyear 
investment and management plan for its Information Integration 
and Technology Transformation program for fiscal years 2014 
through 2017.

                               TITLE III

            PROTECTION, PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY

              National Protection and Programs Directorate

    The National Protection and Programs Directorate aims to 
foster better integration of national approaches between 
strategic homeland security programs, facilitate infrastructure 
protection, ensure broad emergency communications capabilities, 
and ensure the protection of Federal buildings and facilities.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                  NATIONAL PROTECTION AND PROGRAMS DIRECTORATE
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Fiscal year      Fiscal year
                                                                     2013         2014 budget       Committee
                                                                  enacted\1\        request      recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management and administration................................           50,154           64,725           59,523
Infrastructure protection and information security:
    Infrastructure protection................................          260,050          260,950          273,214
    Cybersecurity............................................          755,830          810,409          803,827
    Communications...........................................          140,124          130,635          131,959
                                                              --------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Infrastructure protection and information            1,156,004        1,201,994        1,209,000
       security..............................................
                                                              ==================================================
Federal Protective Service...................................        1,301,824        1,301,824        1,301,824
Office of Biometric Identity Management......................          232,115            (\2\)          205,967
                                                              --------------------------------------------------
      Total, National Protection and Programs Directorate            2,740,097        2,568,543        2,776,314
       (gross)...............................................
                                                              ==================================================
Offsetting fee collections...................................       -1,301,824       -1,301,824       -1,301,824
                                                              --------------------------------------------------
      Total, National Protection and Programs Directorate            1,438,273        1,266,719        1,474,490
       (net).................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.
\2\Funding requested under title II, in U.S. Customs and Border Protection ``Salaries and Expenses'' as US-
  VISIT.

                     MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     $50,154,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      64,725,000
House allowance.........................................      50,522,000
Committee recommendation................................      59,523,000

\1\Does not reflect the March l, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    This account funds salaries and expenses for the Office of 
the Under Secretary, which oversees all activities of the 
National Protection and Programs Directorate [NPPD]. This 
account also funds business operations and information 
technology support services.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $59,523,000 for Management and 
Administration, $5,202,000 below the amount requested and 
$9,369,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. The 
budget request proposed an increase of $14,571,000 over the 
fiscal year 2013 level to respond to increased needs in 
management functions such as budget, finance, and acquisitions; 
human resource management; and civil rights and civil liberties 
services. An increase is also requested for facility costs. 
According to NPPD, while the mission responsibilities and 
number of FTE have grown substantially, management and 
administration funding has shrunk from 4.21 percent in fiscal 
year 2008 to 1.84 percent in 2012. This puts the Directorate at 
risk for failing to complete effective acquisition, efficient 
information technology procurement, timely hiring, and proper 
oversight of privacy civil rights and civil liberties for 
serious missions such as cybersecurity, law enforcement, and 
infrastructure protection. This also puts taxpayers' 
investments at an unacceptable level of risk. Unfortunately, 
the request for additional resources comes at a time when 
budget pressures require tightening of the administrative belt, 
not expansion. The Committee therefore provides a portion of 
the additional resources and directs NPPD to target the 
increases only to actions that will ensure wise management of 
resources and protection against misuse of Federal funds. NPPD 
shall brief the Committee within 60 days after the date of 
enactment of this act on the expenditure plan. The briefing 
shall include a clear description of how the investment will 
protect taxpayer investment in the NPPD mission.
    The Committee notes that NPPD submitted an addendum to the 
budget request to restructure the PPA lines for 
``Infrastructure Protection and Information Security'' and 
understands the intent behind the realignment of resources is 
to promote better program management. Given the delay in 
finalizing the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations 
Act, 2013, the belated delivery of the fiscal year 2014 
President's budget request, and the uncertainty of 
sequestration, the Committee recommendation does not include 
such a realignment. NPPD is encouraged to submit a report to 
the Committee realigning resources, in the same format as 
proposed, using funding levels recommended to date by both the 
House of Representatives and the United States Senate, for 
potential use in future congressional action. The report should 
also include a 5-year history reflecting the realignment which 
will further assist the Committee in transparently 
demonstrating resources provided.

           INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION AND INFORMATION SECURITY

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................  $1,156,004,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................   1,201,994,000
House allowance.........................................   1,176,629,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,209,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    Infrastructure Protection and Information Security [IPIS] 
programs assist the entities and people responsible for 
securing the Nation's critical infrastructure assets. In 
addition, IPIS supports collaborative efforts with State, 
local, public, private, and international entities to secure 
cyberspace and U.S. cyber assets, and reduce the vulnerability 
of the Nation's telecommunications and information technology 
infrastructures.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends total appropriations of 
$1,209,000,000 for Infrastructure Protection and Information 
Security programs, $7,006,000 above the amount requested and 
$52,996,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. The 
following table summarizes the Committee's recommendations as 
compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget request levels:

                               INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION AND INFORMATION SECURITY
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Fiscal year     Fiscal year
                                                                      2013         2014 budget      Committee
                                                                   enacted\1\        request     recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infrastructure protection and information security:
    Infrastructure protection:
        Infrastructure analysis and planning...................          58,891          57,975           66,134
        Sector management and governance.......................          66,973          60,477           64,988
        Regional field operations..............................          56,344          56,708           56,550
        Infrastructure security compliance.....................          77,842          85,790           85,542
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Infrastructure protection..................         260,050         260,950          273,214
                                                                ================================================
Cybersecurity and communications:
    Cybersecurity:
        Cybersecurity coordination.............................           3,981           4,338            4,320
        US-Computer Incident Response Team [US-CERT] Operations          92,804         102,636          102,486
        Federal network security...............................         235,681         199,769          199,725
        Network security deployment............................         328,575         406,441          393,302
        Global cybersecurity management........................          25,921          19,057           25,892
        Critical infrastructure cyber protection and awareness.          62,665          73,043           73,013
        Business operations....................................           6,203           5,125            5,089
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Cybersecurity..............................         755,830         810,409          803,827
                                                                ================================================
    Communications:
        Office of emergency communications.....................          38,603          36,516           37,946
        Priority telecommunications services...................          53,195          53,412           53,372
        Next generation networks...............................          24,467          21,160           21,158
        Programs to study and enhance telecommunications.......          12,913          10,102           10,074
        Critical infrastructure protection programs............          10,946           9,445            9,409
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Communications.............................         140,124         130,635          131,959
                                                                ================================================
          Subtotal, Cybersecurity and communications...........         895,954         941,044          935,786
                                                                ================================================
          Total, Infrastructure protection and information            1,156,004       1,201,994        1,209,000
           security............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                       INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

    The Committee recommends $273,214,000 for Infrastructure 
Protection, $12,264,000 above the amount requested and 
$13,164,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. 
Infrastructure protection is critical to guard against loss of 
life and property. Small investments in information sharing, 
training, and government/private sector coordination can enable 
effective protection against, or response to, incidents. The 
explosions at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013, 
demonstrate the potential for attacks where people gather and 
an effective response when entities work together. The 
explosion of the West Fertilizer Company in Texas, while 
apparently an act of negligence, serves as a reminder that 
chemicals cannot fall into the hands of bad actors. For these 
reasons, the Committee has included targeted increases for 
programs that enhance protection against known threats.
    Of the total amount provided for Infrastructure Protection, 
$66,134,000 is provided for Infrastructure Analysis and 
Planning, which is $8,159,000 above the request. The Office of 
Bombing Prevention shall be funded at no less than $10,504,000, 
which is $2,247,000 above the request and the same amount as 
fiscal year 2013. This funding will sustain needed training, 
information sharing, and awareness for State, local, and 
private sector entities regarding how terrorists use 
explosives, in addition to needed analysis of counter-
explosives requirements, capabilities, and gaps. The Committee 
is aware of the Office of Bombing Prevention's efforts to work 
with the National Guard on training and encourages the Office 
to analyze efficiencies that could be gained through 
coordination with the National Guard mission. The Committee 
further encourages the Office to continue to work with the 
Department of Defense on capabilities related to counter 
explosives, including the possible transfer, equipping, and 
storage of electronic countermeasures. The Office should also 
continue to explore applicable capabilities from defense 
programs that comply with domestic policies and protections, 
such as privacy.
    The Committee notes that to provide reliable analysis in a 
timely manner for notice--and especially no-notice--events, 
data and information must be readily available on a range of 
topics such as the electrical grid, oil and gas resources, 
flood projections, drought conditions, and pandemic models. The 
Committee is concerned that as budgets tighten, preparedness 
priorities are negatively impacted by the issue of the day. It 
is critical that NPPD maintain a robust infrastructure 
information and analysis capability for use in decisionmaking 
to prevent and respond to incidents. Therefore, the remaining 
increase provided for Infrastructure Analysis and Planning 
shall be used to ensure NPPD has readily accessible data 
available for quick analysis in the areas of highest risk. NPPD 
shall brief the Committee within 60 days after the date of 
enactment of this act on the expenditure plan for funding 
allocations in the Infrastructure Analysis and Planning PPA.
    The National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center 
shall be funded at no less than $15,650,000, as requested.
    The Committee recommends no less than $18,000,000 for 
vulnerability assessments, as requested. The Committee notes 
that in conducting assessments on risks to critical 
infrastructure and key resources, interdependencies on 
associated infrastructure--including cyber--are often 
discovered. The Committee encourages NPPD to ensure this 
information is shared regionally to maximize the benefits of 
the assessments and facilitate planning for restoration of 
services post-disaster.
    The Committee provides the proposed increase in funds for 
infrastructure sector analysis which will combine critical 
infrastructure risk analysis, including cyber, with modeling 
and simulation to inform risk decisions and improve security 
and resilience for communities. The Committee is convinced that 
communities and the public can benefit from better coordination 
between NPPD programs oriented toward resiliency of 
infrastructure and FEMA programs dedicated to mitigation 
against disasters. NPPD and FEMA are directed to brief the 
Committee jointly, no later than 60 days after the date of 
enactment of this act, on possibilities for program 
coordination between the two components, including information 
sharing among DHS components, Federal agencies, State and local 
partners, and the private sector.
    The Committee directs NPPD to fully fund training of safety 
and security professionals charged with public protection at 
large venues with large crowds. The Committee encourages the 
Department to continue strengthening existing partnerships with 
institutions and centers that have well-developed training 
programs for security personnel to meet safety and security 
requirements at large venues, including those that host 
professional, collegiate, and amateur sporting events. Such 
entities should possess unique resources, research, and 
programs that can be combined to enhance dissemination of 
effective security techniques to sports safety venue 
professionals.
    Of the total amount provided for Infrastructure Protection, 
$12,876,000 is provided for sector specific agency management, 
which is $4,653,000 above the request and the same amount as 
fiscal year 2013. The tragic explosion at the West Fertilizer 
Company facility in Texas revealed that the facility contained 
levels of ammonium nitrate that required it to register with 
DHS through the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards 
[CFATS] program. The facility had not registered and DHS was 
unaware of the presence of ammonium nitrate at the site. 
However, the facility had submitted a separate chemical 
security report to the Environmental Protection Agency that 
could have alerted DHS to the presence of chemicals of interest 
at this facility. This demonstrates the need for NPPD to have a 
more robust coordination effort to promote cooperation among 
industry and with other relevant Federal agencies in the 
chemical sector. NPPD is directed to support the Chemical 
Sector Coordination Council in an effort to develop 
recommendations to improve the coordination among Federal 
agencies, streamline reporting requirements, and improve the 
CFATS program to create efficiency and effectiveness. The 
recommendations shall be provided in a report directly to the 
Committee from the Council. Additional needed coordination 
efforts also apply to the 15 sister infrastructure sectors 
including transportation, energy, water and wastewater, and 
food and agriculture. NPPD is directed to brief the Committee 
no later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this act 
on how coordination efforts will be improved to maximize 
effectiveness.
    The Committee recommends $85,542,000 for Infrastructure 
Security Compliance, $248,000 below the request and $7,700,000 
above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. Infrastructure 
Security Compliance funding is provided for implementation of 
the CFATS program. There are over 4,300 facilities covered by 
CFATS. Since its inception, over 3,000 facilities that would 
have been covered are now exempt from the program due to 
mitigation efforts identified and taken. The Committee notes 
that all tier one facilities will have approved plans by the 
third quarter of fiscal year 2014, according to NPPD. The Under 
Secretary of NPPD is directed to provide a report on the 
implementation of the CFATS program to the Committee on a 
semiannual basis that includes the number of: facilities 
covered, inspectors, completed inspections, inspections 
completed by region, pending inspections, days inspections are 
overdue, enforcements resulting from inspections, and 
enforcements overdue for resolution. This data should be 
delineated by tier. The first report shall be submitted no 
later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this act.
    The Committee notes a requirement, under title I, for the 
Deputy Secretary to continue semiannual reporting to the 
Committee on coordinating chemical security responsibilities 
with all relevant Departmental components and the Office of 
Management and Budget. NPPD is expected to continue its 
involvement in this effort.

                             CYBERSECURITY

    The Committee recommends $803,827,000 for Cybersecurity 
programs, $6,582,000 below the budget request and $47,997,000 
above the fiscal year 2013 level.
    The risk to cyberspace has been identified by the 
Administration and experts as both an economic and national 
security threat to the United States, with potential virtual 
and physical consequences. NPPD reports that in fiscal year 
2012 it responded to 70 incidents per month; processed 160,000 
incident reports from Federal agencies, infrastructure owners, 
and international partners; and received 9,500 files for 
malware analysis resulting in 7,455 actionable alerts. This is 
a clear threat to our way of life, the government, and the 
infrastructure which provides power, water, financial systems 
and more. To combat the threat it is imperative to develop not 
only technological advances and but also trained cyber experts.
    Of the total amount for cybersecurity, the Committee 
recommends $199,725,000 for Federal Network Security, of which 
$165,946,000 is to provide continuous monitoring and 
diagnostics for the civilian Federal computer network to detect 
malicious activity on government networks. While NPPD is 
leading the effort for continuous monitoring and diagnostics 
and funds are provided for standardizing and improving this 
capability across the Federal enterprise, the responsibility 
for information technology management, including security, 
remains with each Federal agency. As such, each agency must 
continue to plan and budget for security needs consistent with 
current law and policies as well as emerging threats and needs. 
NPPD shall provide its expertise and capabilities to 
supplement, but not supplant, the budget and responsibilities 
of other agencies. A general provision, first enacted in fiscal 
year 2013, is retained which requires quarterly reports on the 
progress of the implementation of this effort.
    The Committee supports NPPD's efforts to continually 
evaluate and improve the National Cybersecurity Protection 
System [NCPS], known as Einstein. Deployed in 2004, the system 
has been upgraded in stages which continue to evolve with both 
technological advances and the threat. A comprehensive review 
of the program's effectiveness in terms of current and planned 
capabilities and gaps has not been completed for Congress in 
several years. The Committee directs GAO to complete an in-
depth review of the National Cybersecurity Protection System, 
including the system's ability to meet the stated mission, 
NPPD's effectiveness in designing the requirements for future 
stages of the system, and Federal agency cooperation and 
consistency in adopting the system. A report with the findings 
shall be submitted to the Committees no later than 270 days 
after the date of enactment of this act.
    The Committee recommends $25,892,000 for Global 
Cybersecurity Management, of which no less than $15,824,000 is 
for cybersecurity education. The Committee is concerned about 
the development of the current and future cybersecurity 
workforce and whether it is adequate to address the public's 
cyber vulnerability. The Committee notes the proposed 
$6,864,000 reduction below the fiscal year 2013 level for 
cybersecurity education programs is inconsistent with the 
stated goal of educating 1,700,000 students by 2021. The 
justification for the delay is to serve higher priority 
cybersecurity efforts; however, investments proposed in 
technology will not be useful if there is not a trained 
workforce to support those tools in future years. The Committee 
expects DHS to submit a fiscal year 2015 budget request that 
fully funds its stated goal with regard to cybersecurity 
education or submit a revised goal with a justification 
outlining how the revision meets the Nation's security needs. 
In addition, the Committee strongly encourages the Department 
to consider how veterans, particularly wounded warriors, can be 
integrated into the cybersecurity workforce.
    The Committee directs the Office of the Undersecretary of 
NPPD and the Office of the Administrator of FEMA to brief the 
Committee on the likely physical and psychological consequences 
of a cyber attack, including the potential magnitude of the 
effect; State, local, and tribal government preparedness and 
response coordination; and Federal coordination and readiness.
    The Committee understands that, per the President's 
Executive Order on Improving Critical Infrastructure and 
Cybersecurity, Federal agencies are developing recommendations 
to provide incentives for the private sector to take 
cybersecurity measures. The Committee expects the 
Administration to provide a comprehensive review of the 
incentives to Congress, the private sector, and the public for 
input as soon as practicable.

                     NATIONAL CYBERSECURITY REVIEW

    In March of 2012, the Department completed the first 
National Cybersecurity Review assessing the cybersecurity 
capabilities of State and local jurisdictions by surveying 162 
States, territories, and localities across the country. This 
well-executed effort strengthened partnerships between levels 
of government, created a baseline of the cybersecurity posture 
of multiple levels of government, and identified areas on which 
to focus future cybersecurity efforts. According to NPPD, the 
survey will be updated every other year in order to measure 
progress and identify emerging areas of concern. The Committee 
expects the second survey will be completed in fiscal year 
2014. NPPD is directed to brief the Committees no later than 30 
days after the date of enactment of this act on the timeframe 
needed to complete the review, the stakeholders that will be 
included in the process, and any planned changes in the focus 
of the effort. NPPD is encouraged to consider privacy as a 
focus area in future surveys.

                             COMMUNICATIONS

    The Committee recommends $131,959,000 for communications 
programs, $1,324,000 above the amount requested and $8,165,000 
below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    Of the total amount recommended, $37,946,000 is for the 
Office of Emergency Communications [OEC], $1,430,000 above the 
amount requested. On July 6, 2012, President Obama issued 
Executive Order 13618 which clarified the national security and 
emergency preparedness communications responsibilities for the 
Federal government. As a result, DHS realigned programs by 
combining the traditional interoperable communications support 
provided by the Office of Communications with the technical 
capabilities of the National Communications System to address 
emergency communications issues. This streamlining of Federal 
functions does not reduce DHS's responsibility to promote and 
support State and local efforts for interoperable 
communications and effective use of technology advancements. In 
a recent GAO report (GAO-12-343) on emergency communications, 
challenges were identified that are likely to slow 
implementation of a public safety broadband network. Several 
Federal agencies have responsibilities in this area, but 
specifically, GAO recommends that DHS work with Federal, State, 
and local partners to identify and communicate opportunities 
for joint procurement of devices that will be used on the 
broadband network to ensure public safety agencies are not 
overpaying for handheld communications devices. The Committee 
provides additional funding to ensure OEC can fulfill the need 
for planning, testing, technical assistance, and 
standardization for efficient use of the communications 
infrastructure.

                       FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................  $1,301,824,000
Budget estimate, 2014\1\................................   1,301,824,000
House allowance\1\......................................   1,301,824,000
Committee recommendation\1\.............................   1,301,824,000

\1\Fully funded by offsetting collections paid by General Services 
Administration tenants and credited directly to this appropriation.

    The Federal Protective Service [FPS] is responsible for the 
security and protection of Federal property under the control 
of the General Services Administration [GSA]; and for the 
enforcement of laws for the protection of persons and property, 
the prevention of breaches of peace, and enforcement of any 
rules and regulations made and promulgated by the GSA 
Administrator and/or the Secretary. The FPS authority can also 
be extended by agreement to any area with a significant Federal 
interest. The FPS account provides funds for the salaries, 
benefits, travel, training, and other expenses of the program, 
offset by collections paid by GSA tenants and credited to the 
account.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $1,301,824,000, as requested, for 
salaries and expenses of the Federal Protective Service for 
fiscal year 2014. This amount is fully offset by collections of 
security fees.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                           FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic security............................................           271,540           271,540           271,540
Building-specific security................................           509,056           509,056           509,056
Reimbursable security fees (contract guard services)......           521,228           521,228           521,228
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Federal Protective Service...................         1,301,824         1,301,824         1,301,824
Offsetting fee collections................................        -1,301,824        -1,301,824        -1,301,824
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

    The Federal Protective Service is funded through fees 
assessed to participating agencies by the Office of Management 
and Budget [OMB]. A provision is included in the bill requiring 
the Secretary and the Director of OMB to certify that FPS is 
sufficiently funded to support 1,371 FTE, including no less 
than 1,007 police officers, inspectors, area commanders, and 
special agents, by December 31, 2013.
    A provision was included in the Department of Homeland 
Security Appropriations Acts of 2012 and 2013 requiring FPS to 
submit a strategic human capital plan that aligns fee 
collections to personnel requirements based on a current threat 
assessment. FPS submitted an Interim Strategic Human Capital 
Plan on April 10, 2013. The plan describes how a workforce 
framework will be implemented based on an FTE level of 1,371. 
While this information provides insight into the current 
capability within the current budget, it does not fulfill the 
congressional requirement to determine the need for resources 
based on risk to Federal employees and the officers that 
protect them. Without such a guiding document, decisionmakers 
cannot reliably match resources to threat. A provision is 
included to again require a strategic human capital plan that 
aligns fee collections to personnel requirements based on a 
current threat assessment and directs FPS to meet the spirit of 
the law. Separately, the Committee directs GAO to review the 
FPS workforce size and its area of responsibility in comparison 
to similar law enforcement agencies and provide a report the 
Committee on areas of risk FPS should consider addressing.
    The Committee also understands FPS is currently engaged in 
an effort to link operations, performance, and cost data. The 
Committee directs FPS to complete this effort as it is critical 
in addressing the issues found by GAO related to the fee 
structure and the timing of budget decisions (GAO-11-492). Two 
elements of the overall current effort are to complete an 
activity-based costing program and finalize implementation of 
the Modified Infrastructure Survey Tool, which will replace the 
Risk Assessment Management Program. Both efforts are in the 
final stages and the Committee encourages such efforts to be 
completed expeditiously. The Office of the Under Secretary for 
NPPD, in conjunction with the Director of FPS, shall brief the 
Committee not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of 
this act on the implementation of the management and budget 
improvement efforts.

                OFFICE OF BIOMETRIC IDENTITY MANAGEMENT

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $232,115,000
Budget estimate, 2014\2\................................................
House allowance.........................................     232,190,000
Committee recommendation................................     205,967,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Funding requested under U.S. Customs and Border Protection ``Salaries 
and Expenses'' as US-VISIT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                MISSION

    The mission of the Office of Biometric Identity Management 
[OBIM] is to collect, maintain, and share biometric data with 
authorized DHS, Federal, State, tribal, local law enforcement 
agencies, and strategic foreign partners. As the agency 
responsible for maintaining the Automated Biometric 
Identification System [IDENT] and a biometric center of 
expertise, OBIM provides an invaluable capability to ensure 
national security, public safety and the integrity of the 
Nation's immigration system. OBIM is charged with fostering 
full interoperability and real-time data sharing among the 
Homeland Security, Justice and Defense Departments' biometric 
identity management systems. OBIM also must ensure that 
biometrics can be used as the means to link associated 
biographic information such that individuals can be uniquely 
identified, serving its customers' security, facilitation, and 
customer service needs.

                             RECOMMENDATION

    The Committee recommends $205,967,000 for OBIM. This is 
$205,967,000 above the request and $26,148,000 below the amount 
provided in fiscal year 2013. This level includes: $42,747,000 
for Salaries and Expenses [S&E]; $15,926,000 for Systems 
Engineering; $127,224,000 for Operations and Maintenance [O&M]; 
and $20,070,000 for Identity Management and Screening Services. 
The Committee's recommendation continues the direction provided 
in Public Law 113-6, realigning US-VISIT funding to this 
account, ICE and CBP, and includes the transfer of the Arrival 
Departure Information System [ADIS] to CBP. The realignment of 
funds reflects the missions of these entities. ICE is 
responsible for conducting overstay analysis and CBP is 
responsible for carrying out entry and exit program policy and 
operations.
    Language is included in the bill requiring a multi-year 
investment and management plan be submitted with the 
President's budget request that justifies current and future 
requirements for OBIM. The Committee directs OBIM to continue 
efforts to identify efficiencies under this new structure 
through reassessing its staffing, travel, and contractor 
support requirements.

                        FOCUSED CUSTOMER SERVICE

    OBIM is expected to continue its strong coordination with 
DHS and interagency partners to ensure appropriate focus on 
customer needs and service. As a forum for this focus, OBIM 
shall reconstitute the US-VISIT Executive Stakeholder Board, 
considering any appropriate changes that would enhance the 
Board's effectiveness.
    US-VISIT has been in discussions with TSA and the Office of 
the Chief Security Officer for years regarding enrolling 
additional populations into IDENT. OBIM now has the appropriate 
mission focus to address the mission needs for enrolling TSA's 
special vetted populations as well as departmental employees 
and contractors. These populations and other potential future 
populations would enable better security and improve customer 
service. Consequently, OBIM is directed to provide a briefing 
on its progress and strategy for these enrollments not later 
than 60 days after the date of enactment of this act.

                            UNIQUE IDENTITY

    DHS is encouraged to work cooperatively with the 
Departments of Justice, Defense, and State to standardize and 
share biometric information. The Committee directs OBIM to 
continue semi-annual briefings on progress toward integrating 
the various systems, including Unique Identity, to describe 
existing capability gaps and a methodology by which to close 
them. Further, the Committee encourages OBIM to continue its 
data sharing and connectivity improvement efforts with the 
Intelligence Community.

                ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE INFORMATION SYSTEM

    The recommended funding level reflects the movement of the 
Arrival Departure Information System [ADIS] to CBP. The 
Committee directs OBIM to support the successful transition of 
this system to CBP. Further, the Committee believes that the 
transition of ADIS gives OBIM the ability to focus completely 
on the effectiveness of IDENT and its modernization needs.
    Reiterating direction provided in the report accompanying 
Public Law 113-6, the Committee directs OBIM to undertake a 
rigorous review of its Information Technology costs and 
modernization needs and to outline proposals for efficiencies 
and cost savings in OBIM's investment and management plan. OBIM 
is encouraged to apply efficiencies and cost savings to 
continue the Unique Identity program and modernize IDENT.
    OBIM also is directed to brief the Committees on a 
semiannual basis on its workload and service levels, staffing, 
modernization efforts, and other operations. All of the OBIM-
related semiannual briefings should occur at the same time.

                        OFFICE OF HEALTH AFFAIRS

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $132,324,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     131,797,000
House allowance.........................................     123,425,000
Committee recommendation................................     127,689,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Office of Health Affairs [OHA], headed by the Chief 
Medical Officer who also serves as the Assistant Secretary for 
Health Affairs, leads the Department on medical issues related 
to natural and man-made disasters; serves as the principal 
advisor to the Secretary on medical and public health issues; 
coordinates biodefense activities within the Department; and 
serves as the Department's primary contact with other 
Departments and State, local, and tribal governments on medical 
and public health issues.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends total appropriations of 
$127,689,000 for Office of Health Affairs programs. The 
following table summarizes the Committee's recommendations as 
compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget request levels:

                                            OFFICE OF HEALTH AFFAIRS
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Fiscal year     Fiscal year
                                                                      2013         2014 budget      Committee
                                                                   enacted\1\        request     recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BioWatch.......................................................          85,277          90,609           87,609
National Biosurveillance Integration Center....................          12,983           8,000            8,000
Chemical Defense Program.......................................           1,997             824              824
Planning and coordination......................................           5,400           4,995            4,995
Salaries and expenses..........................................          26,667          27,369           26,261
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
      Total, Office of Health Affairs..........................         132,324         131,797          127,689
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                                BIOWATCH

    The Committee recommends $87,609,000 for the BioWatch 
Program, $3,000,000 below the amount requested and $2,332,000 
above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. This funding 
sustains current operations. The President's request includes 
significant increases for training, guidance, concept of 
operation, and exercise activities. A portion of those 
increases are provided and OHA is directed to prioritize the 
available funds based on risk.
    No funds are provided for acquisition of Generation 3 
technology, consistent with the President's budget request. A 
recent report by the Homeland Security Studies and Analysis 
Institute found that while DHS should proceed with a Generation 
3 acquisition program, it should not do so until plans are 
further developed and program documentation is updated. 
Unfortunately, the established deadlines to complete the 
necessary work for progression of this program have not been 
met in a timely manner. An analysis of alternatives and 
reevaluation of the mission statement is currently underway and 
results are expected in the autumn of 2013. The Committee 
supports ongoing efforts to improve the Nation's biological 
detection capabilities. DHS is directed to complete its review 
of the program without delay, and to brief the Committee no 
later than September 15, 2013, on the results of the analysis 
of alternatives, the reevaluation of the mission statement, and 
a clear path forward for development of the next generation 
technology. As part of the review, DHS should consult with 
other Federal agencies that have either technical or program 
expertise that can lend to evaluation of the program, including 
the Departments of Defense and Health and Human Services.
    In addition, the Committee is interested in an assessment 
of the current BioWatch capability. As the analysis of 
alternatives for Generation 3 is already underway, this 
assessment may be conducted separately to be completed no later 
than November 1, 2013. The assessment shall evaluate the cost 
benefit of current capability and consider alternative options 
to further our Nation's ability to detect and identify 
biological agents.

              NATIONAL BIOSURVEILLANCE INTEGRATION CENTER

    The Committee recommends $8,000,000 for the National 
Biosurveillance Integration Center [NBIC], the same amount as 
requested and $4,983,000 below the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013.
    The Committee notes a strategic plan for NBIC to promote 
early warning for and share situational awareness of biological 
events was published in November 2012. The plan establishes 
initiatives that may be measured and validated to ensure 
specific goals are accomplished, including dissemination of 
timely, useful, integrated Federal information related to 
incidents and threats. In addition, as part of the NBIC 
strategy, pilot projects are completed to demonstrate new 
capabilities for operational implementation. OHA is directed to 
brief the Committee on the progress of the implementation of 
the strategic plan and the specific outcomes of the pilot 
projects no later than 60 days after the date of enactment of 
this act. The briefing shall include identification of 
obstacles to the implementation of the strategic plan and the 
timeframe for completion of the pilot programs. The ongoing 
costs and new needs for pilot projects should be identified in 
the brief. Pilot projects shall be competitively awarded in 
fiscal year 2014.

                        CHEMICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM

    The Committee recommends $824,000 for the Chemical Defense 
Program, the same amount as requested and $1,173,000 below the 
amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    The Committee notes OHA is in the process of seeking public 
input before awarding demonstration projects aimed at 
developing a comprehensive chemical defense framework. OHA is 
encouraged to finalize the awards as soon as the appropriate 
input is considered. The Committee believes all high-risk 
situations should be considered for study to ensure useful 
information is made available on mitigation and response 
measures. OHA is directed to brief the Committee no later than 
August 2, 2013, on the timeframe to finalize the awards and the 
risk factors that will be considered in awarding demonstration 
projects.

                       PLANNING AND COORDINATION

    The Committee recommends $4,995,000 for Planning and 
Coordination, the same amount as requested and $405,000 below 
the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. The Committee is 
concerned that proposed reductions to programs in planning and 
coordination will begin to erode future capacity for OHA to 
implement the workforce health mission as well as its 
responsibilities related to HSPD-9 regarding food, water, agro-
defense, veterinary, and zoonotic diseases. OHA is directed to 
brief the Committee regarding how mission capability has been 
maintained, within the resources requested and provided, no 
later than December 17, 2013.

                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

    The Committee recommends $26,261,000 for Salaries and 
Expenses, $1,108,000 below the amount requested and $406,000 
below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. OHA has 
consistently lapsed funding due to slow hiring.

                  Federal Emergency Management Agency

    The primary mission of the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency [FEMA] is to reduce the loss of life and property and 
protect the Nation from all hazards, including natural 
disasters, acts of terrorism, and other manmade disasters, by 
leading and supporting the Nation in a risk-based, 
comprehensive emergency management system of preparedness, 
protection, response, recovery, and mitigation. The following 
table summarizes the Committee's recommendations as compared to 
the fiscal year 2013 and budget request levels:

                                       FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Fiscal year 2013   Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                             enacted\1\       budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Salaries and expenses..................................           971,834          1,042,383            948,822
State and local programs...............................         1,464,147          2,123,200          1,502,000
Firefighter Assistance Grants..........................           674,110               (\2\)           675,000
Emergency Management Performance Grants................           349,538               (\2\)           350,000
Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program............            -1,443             -1,272             -1,272
United States Fire Administration......................            43,942             41,306             44,000
Disaster Relief Fund:
    Base...............................................           607,124            594,522            594,522
    Disaster Relief Category...........................         6,400,000          5,626,386          5,626,386
    Disaster Relief Category (Public Law 113-2)........         5,379,000   .................  .................
    Emergency Appropriation (Public Law 113-2).........         6,108,735   .................  .................
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Disaster Relief Fund...................     \3\18,494,859          6,220,908          6,220,908
                                                        ========================================================
Disaster Assistance Direct Loan Program Account\4\.....           300,000   .................  .................
Flood hazard mapping and risk analysis.................            95,203             84,361             95,203
National Flood Insurance Fund\5\.......................          (171,000)          (176,300)          (176,300)
National Predisaster Mitigation Fund...................            24,967   .................            25,000
Emergency food and shelter.............................           119,842            100,000            120,000
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Federal Emergency Management Agency.......     \3\22,536,999          9,610,886          9,979,661
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.
\2\Funding proposed under ``State and Local Programs.''
\3\Includes emergency funding of $6,108,735,000 and disaster relief category funding of $5,379,000,000 in the
  Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2) and disaster relief category funding
  of $6,400,000,000 in the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2013 (division D of Public Law
  113-6).
\4\Includes emergency funding of $300,000,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of
  Public Law 113-2).
\5\Fully offset by fee collection.

                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $971,834,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................   1,042,383,000
House allowance.........................................     922,462,000
Committee recommendation................................     948,822,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    Funding for FEMA Salaries and Expenses provides for the 
development and maintenance of an integrated, nationwide 
capability to prepare for, mitigate against, respond to, and 
recover from the consequences of major disasters and 
emergencies, regardless of cause, in partnership with Federal 
agencies, State, local, and tribal governments, volunteer 
organizations, and the private sector. The Salaries and 
Expenses account supports FEMA's programs by coordinating 
between headquarters and regional offices the policy, 
managerial, resource, and administrative actions.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends total appropriations of 
$948,822,000 for FEMA Salaries and Expenses. The following 
table summarizes the Committee's recommendations as compared to 
the fiscal year 2013 and budget request levels:

                                              SALARIES AND EXPENSES
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative and Regional Offices.......................          257,069           240,736           250,748
    Office of National Capital Region Coordination........           (4,287)           (2,602)           (4,293)
Preparedness and Protection...............................          178,811           293,684           176,406
Response..................................................          179,191           171,665           179,081
    Urban Search and Rescue Response Systems..............          (35,134)          (27,513)          (35,180)
Recovery..................................................           55,226            55,530            55,121
Mitigation................................................           29,775            25,882            28,416
Mission Support...........................................          157,326           144,580           148,744
Centrally Managed Accounts................................          114,436           110,306           110,306
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Salaries and Expenses........................          971,834         1,042,383           948,822
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                       PROGRAM LEVEL COMPARISIONS

    A comparison of FEMA funding levels between the fiscal year 
2013 enacted, budget request, and Committee recommendation 
level is complicated by the Administration's proposed 
realignment of funding between the ``Salaries and Expenses'' 
and ``State and Local Programs'' appropriations. Congressional 
direction to present the budget request in same account and PPA 
structure as provided in the annual DHS Appropriations Acts has 
been consistently ignored. Therefore, in order to promote 
transparency, the following table shows comparable levels of 
funding by PPA for the ``Salaries and Expenses'' appropriation, 
in the same format that funds have been appropriated since 
fiscal year 2012. A similar table is included under the ``State 
and Local Programs'' appropriation to provide an accurate 
comparison of grant funding.

                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative and Regional Offices.......................           257,069           250,669           250,748
Preparedness and Protection...............................           178,811           177,183           176,406
Response..................................................           179,191           171,665           179,081
Recovery..................................................            55,226            55,530            55,121
Mitigation................................................            29,775            25,881            28,416
Mission Support...........................................           157,326           144,580           148,744
Centrally Managed Accounts................................           114,436           110,306           110,306
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal............................................           971,834           935,814           948,822
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                           PROGRAM ACTIVITIES

    Of the total amount made available, $32,000,000 is included 
for Mount Weather capital improvements and operations, as 
requested.
    Of the total amounts provided, not less than: $2,000,000 is 
for the Emergency Management Assistance Compact under the 
Preparedness and Protection PPA; $2,589,000 is for the National 
Hurricane Program under the Response PPA; $8,798,000 is for the 
National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program and $9,360,000 is 
for the National Dam Safety Program under the Mitigation PPA. 
Funding levels for each of these programs are maintained at 
fiscal year 2013 levels.
    The Committee provides $10,496,000 for evaluations and 
assessments, as requested, in the Administration and Regional 
Offices PPA. The release of the second annual National 
Preparedness Report highlights the continuing need for a 
collective set of reliable data sources to continue assessing 
the preparedness of the Nation. While recognizing FEMA's recent 
efforts to assess local, State, and Federal threats, hazards, 
capabilities and preparedness, and use that data to inform 
grant making decisions, the Committee remains concerned that 
specific, crosscutting performance metrics and capability gaps 
have not been completely developed. FEMA is directed to brief 
the Committee on how a measurement system will be finalized to 
assess the Nation's risk and the specific gaps in capability. 
The briefing should clearly describe how the system will be 
repeatable so Congress can use it to evaluate progress and 
consider resources that may be needed to address issues. The 
Committee expects that future grant awards will incorporate 
these performance metrics and address response, preparedness, 
or mitigation gaps.
    The Committee notes that it has been almost 3 years since 
the Local, State, Tribal, and Federal Preparedness Task Force 
provided a report to Congress that took stock of preparedness 
efforts in the Nation and made recommendations for improvement. 
Since then, programs at all levels of Government to assess 
readiness and fill preparedness gaps have changed. FEMA is 
directed to support a reconvening of the task force to evaluate 
progress made on the recommendations and make recommendations 
on new issues that have emerged. The task force shall provide 
the report directly to the Committee.
    FEMA shall continue to encourage State and local 
governments to develop mutual aid agreements and provide 
technical assistance when necessary.

                        AUTOMATION MODERNIZATION

    The Committee provides $5,000,000 above the total amount 
requested to continue FEMA's automation modernization program. 
The funding and the report required in this and previous 
Appropriations Acts provide the means and structure for FEMA to 
modernize its systems for better performance and future costs 
savings. FEMA shall continue to include the DHS CIO in planning 
efforts to ensure compatibility with Department systems where 
practicable.
    The Committee recognizes that citizens and governments in 
the United States use social media during a disaster in various 
ways. The Office of the Administrator is directed to brief the 
Committee not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of 
this act on FEMA's current use of social media during 
disasters, the ability to coordinate social media activity with 
State and local governments, and innovative and promising 
emerging technologies that could fill information need gaps.

             OFFICE OF NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION COORDINATION

    The Committee recommends $4,293,000 for the Office of 
National Capital Region Coordination, $1,691,000 above the 
amount requested and $6,000 above the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013. The Committee recognizes the unique responsibilities 
of the Office in coordinating emergency preparedness and 
response activity in a high-population area, where the 
workforce is made up of many independently operating Federal 
agencies and the District of Columbia, and where National 
leaders and foreign dignitaries are ever present. The Committee 
directs the Office to work expeditiously on its high-priority 
activities such as aligning Federal building emergency plans 
and evacuation procedures to facilitate an orderly evacuation 
for no-notice events; and facilitating daily data sharing 
across local, State, and the plethora of Federal sources for 
situational awareness.
    The Committee remains concerned that planning for 
evacuation of the National Capitol Region during a disaster has 
not incorporated all of the pertinent officials from the 
appropriate local communities and States. Therefore, the 
Committee notes the permanent provision included in the 
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2013, 
requiring inclusion of the Governors of the State of West 
Virginia and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the National 
Capital Region decision-making process for mass evacuations. 
FEMA is directed to include officials from the counties and 
municipalities that contain the evacuation routes and their 
tributaries in the planning process.
    On July 2, FEMA issued a notice announcing the realignment 
of the Office of National Capital Region Coordination. The 
realignment plan is inconsistent with the Homeland Security Act 
[HSA] of 2002, the Department of Homeland Security 
Appropriations Act, 2013, and the President's budget request 
for fiscal years 2013 and 2014. First, the realignment was 
developed without stakeholder input as specifically prescribed 
in the HSA. Second, the plan reduces resources for the Office 
by over 30 percent in overall funding and 53 percent in 
personnel when compared to the funding provided in fiscal year 
2013. Finally, the plan relocates responsibilities to the FEMA 
Region 3 Office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which was not 
proposed in the President's budget. Such a realignment requires 
congressional approval. FEMA is directed to cease any 
realignment of the ONCRC immediately.
    The Committee has long supported making the ONCRC more 
effective through direction to implement programs that serve 
the unique needs of the area with its large Federal workforce 
and need for multi-jurisdiction cooperation in a high risk 
area. Unfortunately, the Committee has never been convinced 
such an effort was made by FEMA through the irresponsible 
budget proposals seen in past years that simply cut funding 
with no reform or explanation of how the mission will be better 
met. Effective planning for a realignment can only be achieved 
by receiving input from the District of Columbia, State, local, 
and regional authorities. To do otherwise is inconsistent with 
congressional intent in establishing the Office and with 
emergency management principles. Should FEMA decide to pursue a 
proposed realignment to Congress, stakeholder input and 
concurrence with the plan will be critical for serious 
consideration.

                URBAN SEARCH AND RESCUE RESPONSE SYSTEM

    The Committee recommends $35,180,000 for the Urban Search 
and Rescue Response System, $7,667,000 above the request and 
$46,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. Funding 
will sustain the existing system and additional chemical, 
biological, nuclear, radiological, and explosives capabilities 
gained in fiscal year 2012.

                     SANDY RECOVERY IMPROVEMENT ACT

    The Committee commends FEMA for developing a task force and 
schedule of work to implement all provisions of the Sandy 
Recovery Improvement Act, which was enacted on January 29, 2013 
(Public Law 113-2, Division B). In order to hasten recovery and 
augment mitigation efforts in areas affected by Hurricane Sandy 
and other disasters throughout the country, FEMA is directed to 
remain focused on this effort and provide the necessary 
resources to continue it in earnest.

                         CHILDREN AND DISASTERS

    The National Commission on Children and Disasters 
highlighted the unique disaster-related needs of America's 73 
million children. The Committee notes the progress that 
focusing on these unique needs has occurred in recent disaster 
response and recovery, particularly by FEMA regional offices. 
The Committee directs FEMA to sustain its ongoing efforts to 
address children's disaster-related needs both in headquarters 
and regional offices. Further, FEMA is directed to provide an 
updated report, not later than 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this act, on grant expenditures related to 
ensuring the needs of children are met, including all sources 
of FEMA grants, such as preparedness and mitigation. FEMA is 
directed to include in the report an additional section which 
identifies the lead senior employee that promotes and sustains 
meeting the needs of children and what specific activities were 
completed to proactively prepare for the long term needs of 
children. FEMA is encouraged to focus such activities on 
providing assistance to States to include the needs of children 
in their planning efforts.

                               RESILIENCE

    The Committee encourages FEMA to continue its efforts 
related to the Strategic Foresight Initiative, which serves the 
emergency management community by looking at factors that are 
likely to change, such as demographic shifts and technological 
advances, in the context of all hazards.
    The Committee is convinced that communities and the public 
can benefit from better coordination between NPPD programs 
oriented toward resiliency of infrastructure and FEMA programs 
dedicated to mitigation against disasters. NPPD and FEMA are 
directed to brief the Committee jointly, no later than 60 days 
after the date of enactment of this act, on possibilities for 
program coordination between the two components, including 
information sharing among DHS components, Federal agencies, 
State and local partners, and the private sector.

                          DEMOLITION STANDARDS

    FEMA requires that newly purchased, condemned buildings 
must be demolished within 90 days of purchase. The brevity of 
the 90-day requirement often leads to long delays before a 
purchase is closed by grantees or subgrantees, who prefer to 
wait until after they have received required environmental and 
historical approvals before finalizing a purchase. These delays 
can impose hardship on the owner of damaged or affected 
properties, who must wait to receive the funds needed to 
rebuild. To resolve this problem FEMA is directed to provide 
270 days for tearing down buildings or establish a more 
reasonable demolition standard.

                            FIRE MITIGATION

    Over the last decade, wildfires have caused an average of 
over $1,000,000,000 in economic damages, killed over 150 
Americans, and destroyed thousands of homes and other 
structures across the Nation. The six worst wildfire seasons in 
the past 50 years in the United States have all occurred since 
2000. The Committee is concerned that mitigation efforts are 
not keeping pace with the growing risk. FEMA is directed to 
provide a report to the Committee no later than 120 days after 
the date of enactment of this act on the efforts being made to 
mitigate wildfires including FEMA technical assistance, 
information sharing, and grant expenditures for the last 5 
years. FEMA should also identify any funding obstacles for 
wildfires in its current mitigation programs.

                          BUDGET PRESENTATION

    The Committee directs FEMA to submit its fiscal year 2015 
budget request, including justification materials, by office. 
Each office and FEMA region shall include (1) budget detail by 
object classification; (2) the number of FTE on-board; (3) the 
number of FTE vacancies; and (4) the appropriations account(s) 
used to support the office and the programs managed by the 
office. The level of detail provides improved transparency and 
refined tracking of actual spending.
    The Committee is disappointed that FEMA has consistently 
ignored congressional direction to present the budget request 
in the same structure as it is appropriated. The Administrator 
of FEMA is again directed to present the fiscal year 2015 
budget request in the same account and PPA structure as 
provided in this bill and report. If in the Administration's 
view, there is a reason to adjust the format, the Committee 
directs FEMA to request such adjustments in an addendum with a 
clear justification for how the changes facilitate better 
resource management and transparency in spending.

                       OFFICE OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

    The Committee expects the Office of External Affairs to 
pursue more effective ways to facilitate FEMA's communication 
with Congress and the public. At times it takes the Agency too 
long to provide information to Congress and that information is 
not always complete. The Office leadership should address this 
issue and develop strategies to more effectively communicate 
and engage with the public, associations, and other interested 
stakeholders. For example, the Agency does not fully leverage 
opportunities to explain the value of mitigation measures 
promoted and funded through FEMA or to highlight the state and 
local capabilities that FEMA's preparedness grant funds have 
helped build. Continually missing opportunities to communicate 
the importance of FEMA's mission and its effectiveness in 
emergency management will make it more difficult for FEMA to be 
successful. The Committee regrets having to address these 
issues in this report; however, multiple requests to improve in 
these areas have not been adequately responded to. The 
Committee directs the Administrator to provide a report within 
120 days of the date of enactment of this act on specific 
measures being taken to strengthen FEMA's ability to 
communicate accurate and timely information to Congress, 
emergency managers, and the public. The report should detail 
improvements on how congressional direction and requests are 
tracked, managed, and resolved, and the opportunities the 
Office of External Affairs has to engage directly with the 
Administrator and his office.

                        STATE AND LOCAL PROGRAMS

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................  $1,464,147,000
Budget estimate, 2014\2\................................   2,123,200,000
House allowance\3\......................................   1,510,000,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,502,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes $670,000,000 proposed for ``Firefighter Assistance Grants'' 
and $350,000,000 proposed for ``Emergency Management Performance 
Grants,'' which continue to be funded in separate appropriations.
\3\Reflects $10,000,000 included in title V, section 587 for this 
appropriation.

    Funding for State and Local Programs provides grants for 
training, equipment (including interoperable communications 
equipment), planning, and exercises to improve readiness for 
potential disasters.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends total appropriations of 
$1,502,000,000 for State and Local Programs. The following 
table summarizes the Committee's recommendations as compared to 
the fiscal year 2013 and budget request levels:

                                            STATE AND LOCAL PROGRAMS
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                 Fiscal year
                                                             Fiscal year 2013    2014 budget        Committee
                                                                enacted\1\         request       recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grants:
    National Preparedness Grant Program....................  ................        1,043,200  ................
    Discretionary State and local grants...................          188,683   ...............  ................
    State Homeland Security Grant Program..................          346,143   ...............          453,000
        Operation Stonegarden..............................          (46,539)  ...............          (46,600)
    Urban Area Security Initiative.........................          499,716   ...............          614,152
        Nonprofit Security Grants..........................           (9,987)  ...............          (13,000)
    Public Transportation Security/Railroad Security/Bus              97,371   ...............          100,640
     Assistance............................................
        Amtrak.............................................           (9,987)  ...............          (10,000)
    Port Security Grants...................................           97,371   ...............          100,640
    First Responder Assistance Programs:
        Emergency Management Performance Grants............             (\2\)          350,000             (\2\)
        Firefighter Assistance Grants......................             (\2\)          670,000             (\2\)
        Training Partnership Grants........................  ................           60,000  ................
                                                            ----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, First Responder Assistance Programs........  ................        1,080,000  ................
                                                            ====================================================
      Subtotal, Grants.....................................        1,229,284         2,123,200        1,268,432
                                                            ====================================================
Education, Training, and Exercises:
    Emergency Management Institute.........................           17,782             (\3\)           20,569
    Center for Domestic Preparedness.......................           64,905             (\3\)           64,905
    National Domestic Preparedness Consortium..............           92,877   ...............           98,000
    National Exercise Program..............................           32,335             (\3\)           21,094
    Continuing training....................................           26,964   ...............           29,000
                                                            ----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Education, Training, and Exercises.........          234,863   ...............          233,568
                                                            ====================================================
      Total, State and Local Programs......................        1,464,147         2,123,200        1,502,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.
\2\Funds appropriated under a separate account.
\3\Funds proposed under FEMA ``Salaries and Expenses.''

                       PROGRAM LEVEL COMPARISIONS

    A comparison of FEMA funding levels between the fiscal year 
2013 enacted, budget request, and Committee recommendation 
level is complicated by the Administrations' proposed 
realignment of funding between the ``Salaries and Expenses'' 
and ``State and Local Programs'' appropriation. Congressional 
direction to present the budget request in same account and PPA 
structure as provided in the annual DHS Appropriations Act has 
been consistently ignored. Therefore, in order to promote 
transparency, the following table shows comparable levels of 
funding by PPA for the ``State and Local Programs'' 
appropriation, in the same format that funds have been 
appropriated since fiscal year 2012. A similar table is 
included under the ``Salaries and Expenses'' appropriation to 
provide an accurate comparison of grant funding.

                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Fiscal year      Fiscal year
                                                               2013 enacted\1\    2014 budget       Committee
                                                                                    request      recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Preparedness Grant Program..........................  ...............       1,043,200   ...............
Discretionary State and local grants.........................         188,683   ...............  ...............
State Homeland Security Grant Program........................         346,143   ...............         453,000
    Operation Stonegarden....................................         (46,539)  ...............         (46,600)
Urban Area Security Initiative...............................         499,716   ...............         614,152
    Nonprofit Security Grants................................          (9,987)  ...............         (13,000)
Transit and Rail Security Grants.............................          97,371   ...............         100,640
    Amtrak...................................................          (9,987)  ...............         (10,000)
Port Security Grants.........................................          97,371   ...............         100,640
                                                              --------------------------------------------------
      Total..................................................       1,229,284        1,043,200        1,268,432
                                                              ==================================================
Training Partnership Grants..................................  ...............          60,000   ...............
Emergency Management Institute...............................          17,782           20,569           20,569
Center for Domestic Preparedness.............................          64,905           61,066           64,905
National Domestic Preparedness Consortium....................          92,877   ...............          98,000
National Exercise Program....................................          32,335           24,933           21,094
Continuing training..........................................          26,964   ...............          29,000
                                                              ==================================================
      Total..................................................         234,863          166,568          233,568
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                              GRANT REFORM

    The Committee notes that the budget request includes a 
proposal for grant reform, similar to the fiscal year 2013 
request. The Committee did not include the proposed reform in 
fiscal year 2013 since it lacked needed detail and stakeholder 
input. Further, the Committee encouraged the Secretary and the 
Administrator of FEMA to work with the committees of 
jurisdiction to refine the proposal. While the Administration 
has indicated a legislative proposal will be provided to the 
authorizing committees of jurisdiction, no such proposal has 
been received. Therefore, funds are appropriated in the same 
manner as fiscal year 2013. A general provision is included 
prohibiting the implementation of grant reform until 
Congressional action on the matter has occurred.

                           GRANTS MANAGEMENT

    The Committee includes specific timeframes for grant dollar 
distribution. For each of the grant programs, funding 
opportunity announcements shall be issued in 60 days, 
applicants shall apply within 80 days after announcements are 
made, and FEMA shall act on the application within 65 days 
after applications are due.
    The Department is encouraged to require State and local 
governments to address child care services and facilities in 
response and recovery plans, exercises, and training. 
Additionally, the Committee is concerned that State and local 
cybersecurity issues are not receiving the needed resources and 
attention, and the Department is encouraged to require State 
and local governments to include their Chief Information 
Officers in planning efforts. The Committee is concerned that 
drinking water and sanitation security needs, especially 
related to emergency response initiatives, are not adequately 
addressed. FEMA is encouraged to require State and local 
governments to include rural water associations in planning 
efforts. The Committee encourages FEMA to consider the need for 
severe weather alert systems and reverse 9-1-1 notification 
systems when evaluating grant applications.
    FEMA shall consider the use of fiduciary agents when 
applicants are managing grants across many jurisdictions, such 
as in the port security grant program.

                 STATE HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM

    The Committee recommends $453,000,000 for the State 
Homeland Security Grant Program [SHSGP], of which $46,600,000 
shall be for Operation Stonegarden. Activities previously 
funded under Metropolitan Medical Response System, Citizens 
Corps, Regional Catastrophic Preparedness, Emergency Operations 
Centers, Driver's Licenses Security Program, Buffer Zone 
Protection Program, and the Interoperable Emergency 
Communication Grant Programs in fiscal year 2011 are eligible 
for funding under SHSGP.
    Operation Stonegarden grants shall continue to be 
competitively awarded and shall not be restricted to any 
particular border. As in previous years, FEMA is directed to 
ensure all border States shall be eligible to apply in fiscal 
year 2014.

                     URBAN AREA SECURITY INITATIVE

    The Committee recommends $614,152,000 for the Urban Areas 
Security Initiative [UASI], of which $13,000,000 shall be for 
nonprofit entities determined to be at high risk by the 
Secretary. Eligibility for nonprofit entities shall not be 
limited to UASI communities. Activities previously funded under 
Metropolitan Medical Response System, Citizens Corps, Regional 
Catastrophic Preparedness, Buffer Zone Protection Program, 
Emergency Operations Centers, and the Interoperable Emergency 
Communication Grant Programs in fiscal year 2011 are eligible 
for funding under UASI.
    The Committee notes that the 9/11 Act requires FEMA to 
conduct a risk assessment for the 100 most populous 
metropolitan areas annually. All such areas are eligible for 
UASI funding based on threat, vulnerability, and consequence.
    The Committee notes that security costs for National 
Special Security Events, and similarly assessed special events 
with extra security needs, are an eligible expense under SHSGP 
and UASI, and such events should be considered in awarding 
grants.

              LAW ENFORCEMENT TERRORISM PREVENTION PROGRAM

    In accordance with section 2006 of the Homeland Security 
Act of 2002, the Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program 
[LETPP] is funded through a required set aside of 25 percent of 
the funds appropriated through the SHSGP and UASI programs. The 
Committee directs FEMA to provide clear guidance to State and 
urban areas to ensure that the intent of LETPP is fully 
realized. FEMA is directed to provide an update of the report 
on expenditures for prevention activities, as required in 
Senate Report 112-74 no later than 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this act.

     PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ASSISTANCE, RAILROAD SECURITY 
         ASSISTANCE, AND OVER-THE-ROAD BUS SECURITY ASSISTANCE

    The Committee recommends $100,640,000 for Public 
Transportation Security Assistance, Railroad Security 
Assistance and Over-the-Road Bus Security Assistance. Of the 
recommended amount, no less than $10,000,000 is for Amtrak 
security needs.

                          PORT SECURITY GRANTS

    The Committee recommends $100,640,000 for the Port Security 
Grant Program. FEMA is directed to work with stakeholders of 
the port security grant program to identify ways to expedite 
the grant review process and brief the Committee no later than 
120 days after the date of enactment of this act on the 
specific steps that can be taken to shorten the length of time 
for obligation of grants.

                   EDUCATION, TRAINING, AND EXERCISES

    The Committee recommends $233,568,000 for Education, 
Training, and Exercises. Of this amount, the Committee 
recommends $64,905,000 for the Center for Domestic Preparedness 
and notes a permanent provision in the Department of Homeland 
Security Appropriations Act, 2013, regarding training conducted 
at the Center. A provision is included permitting the 
Administrator to use the funds provided under paragraph (5) in 
this act to acquire real property for the purpose of 
establishing or appropriately extending the security buffer 
zones for FEMA-owned training facilities. Funding used for such 
purpose shall only come from funds specifically appropriated to 
the facility for which the property is acquired.
    Within the total, the Committee includes $98,000,000 for 
the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium, instead of 
$60,000,000 for Training Partnership Grants, as proposed in the 
budget which combines and reduces current first responder 
training. The Consortium, authorized by the 9/11 Act, has 
conducted training in all 50 States and each U.S. territory. 
Over 1,900,000 first responders have been trained to date. The 
existing Consortium members have proven to be an effective 
delivery system for this important training. Dismantling the 
current program and replacing proven instructional bodies with 
an undefined system of providers would diminish the quality and 
consistency of training available to first responders. Funding 
shall be distributed in accordance with the 9/11 Act and as in 
previous years.
    The Committee includes $20,569,000 for the Emergency 
Management Institute, the same amount as requested and 
$2,787,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. The 
Committee notes the development of training for prevention and 
response to mass casualty shooting incidents and expects 
courses to continue through fiscal year 2014 as proposed.
    The Committee includes $29,000,000 for continuing training 
grants, instead of $60,000,000 for Training Partnership Grants, 
as proposed in the budget which combines and reduces current 
first responder training. The Committee supports full funding 
of programs that deliver homeland security curricula in the 
form of executive education programs and accredited master's 
degree education. The Committee regrets that 10 first 
responders were tragically killed in the explosion of the West 
Fertilizer Company facility in Texas on April 17, 2013. While 
it appears the local response plan called for an evacuation, 
firefighters rushed into danger. To prevent unnecessary loss of 
life, of the total amount provided for continuing training 
grants, no less than $2,000,000 shall be for hazardous 
materials training for first responders. Also, FEMA shall 
consider the training needs of State and local first responders 
in preparedness and response to cybersecurity attacks and 
incidents.
    The Committee includes $21,094,000 for the National 
Exercise Program.

                     FIREFIGHTER ASSISTANCE GRANTS

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $674,110,000
Budget estimate, 2014\2\................................................
House allowance.........................................     680,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     675,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Budget request proposes $670,000,000 under ``State and Local 
Programs.''

    Firefighter assistance grants, as authorized by section 33 
of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (15 
U.S.C. 2229), assist local firefighting departments for the 
purpose of protecting the health and safety of the public and 
fire fighting personnel, including volunteers and emergency 
medical service personnel, against fire and fire-related 
hazards.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $675,000,000 for firefighter 
assistance grants, including $337,500,000 for firefighter 
assistance grants, and $337,500,000 for firefighter staffing 
grants, to remain available until September 30, 2015. This is 
$5,000,000 above the amount requested under the ``State and 
Local Programs'' appropriation and $890,000 above the amount 
provided in fiscal year 2013.
    The Committee directs the Department to continue the 
present practice of funding applications according to local 
priorities and those established by the United States Fire 
Administration, and to continue direct funding to fire 
departments and the peer review process. The Committee expects 
that the rural fire department funding level will be consistent 
with the previous five-year history and FEMA shall brief the 
Committee no later than 30 days after the date of enactment of 
this act if there is an anticipated fluctuation.

                EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANTS

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $349,538,000
Budget estimate, 2014\2\................................................
House allowance.........................................     350,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     350,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Budget proposes $350,000,000 under ``State and Local Programs.''

    Funding requested in this account provides support to the 
Nation's all-hazards emergency management system and helps to 
build State and local emergency management capability.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $350,000,000 for Emergency 
Management Performance Grants [EMPG], which is the same amount 
as requested under the ``State and Local Programs'' 
appropriation, and $462,000 above the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013. The Committee directs FEMA to retain EMPG as a 
separate grant program, and not to combine its funding with any 
other grant allocation or application process.
    The Committee notes the purpose of EMPG is to sustain an 
all-hazards emergency capability at the State and local level. 
The Committee is concerned that in an effort to harmonize grant 
programs, generic grant guidance reduces clarity regarding the 
targeted purpose of these grants. It should be noted, FEMA 
capabilities are only used when a State is overwhelmed in its 
ability to support a disaster and the President declares 
Federal assistance is needed. While there were 99 
Presidentially declared disasters in fiscal year 2011, 250 
gubernatorial emergencies were declared, 13,041 events required 
State assistance, and 44,428 local and tribal events were 
supported using EMPG funded staff or assets, according to the 
National Emergency Management Association. This level of 
activity and the requirement for all levels of government to 
work together for unexpected disasters demonstrates the 
criticality of sustaining a Nationwide capability. The Federal 
contribution through EMPG, which is a little over $1 per 
citizen, is matched by over 50 percent from State and local 
governments. This system enables an efficient response and 
assists in reducing costs to the Disaster Relief Fund. FEMA is 
directed to take into account the unique purpose of EMPG, as 
defined in the Stafford Act, when developing grant guidance.

              RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     -$1,443,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      -1,272,000
House allowance.........................................      -1,272,000
Committee recommendation................................      -1,272,000

\1\Does not reflect the March l, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Radiological Emergency Preparedness [REP] program 
assists State and local governments in the development of off-
site radiological emergency preparedness plans within the 
emergency planning zones of commercial nuclear power facilities 
licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission [NRC]. The fund 
is financed from fees assessed and collected from the NRC 
licensees to recover the amounts anticipated to be obligated in 
the next fiscal year for expenses related to REP program 
activities.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee provides for the receipt and expenditure of 
fees collected, as authorized by Public Law 105-276. The budget 
estimates fee collections to exceed expenditures by $1,272,000 
in fiscal year 2014.

                   UNITED STATES FIRE ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     $43,942,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      41,306,000
House allowance.........................................      44,000,000
Committee recommendation................................      44,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The mission of the United States Fire Administration [USFA] 
is to reduce losses, both economic and human, due to fire and 
other emergencies through training, research, coordination and 
support. USFA also prepares the Nation's first responder and 
healthcare leaders through ongoing, and when necessary, 
expedited training regarding how to evaluate and minimize 
community risk, improve protection to critical infrastructure, 
and be better prepared to react to all hazard and terrorism 
emergencies.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $44,000,000 for the USFA, which is 
$2,694,000 above the amount requested and $58,000 above the 
amount provided in fiscal year 2013. The amount included above 
the request will allow for the continued development of the 
National Fire Incident Reporting System and continue programs 
that promote fire safety and fire prevention in the wildland 
urban interface. According to the United States Fire 
Administration, there have been 66 reported firefighter 
fatalities in 2013. This includes tragic incidents involving 
the loss of multiple firefighters in West, Texas; Houston, 
Texas; and 19 firefighters who gave their lives at the Yarnell 
Hill Fire in Yavapai County, Arizona--the deadliest incident 
for firefighters since September 11, 2001 and the highest loss 
of firefighter lives in a wildland fire in 80 years. USFA, in 
cooperation with FEMA, is directed to continue its traditional 
funding for the congressionally mandated National Fallen 
Firefighters Memorial and related activities, which support the 
needs of survivors after the loss of a firefighter in the line 
of duty. USFA funding, combined with a grant from the 
Department of Justice and private sector support, is critical 
to sustain these services.
    A provision proposed in the budget request permitting State 
fire academies to compete for Firefighter Assistance Grants is 
not included. Instead the recommendation retains resources and 
authority to fully fund the State Fire Training Grant program 
within USFA, as in previous years, to ensure consistency and 
continuity of the program.

                          DISASTER RELIEF FUND

                     (INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\.............................. $18,494,859,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................   6,220,908,000
House allowance.........................................   6,220,908,000
Committee recommendation................................   6,220,908,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $6,108,735,000 and disaster relief 
category funding of $5,379,000,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations 
Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2) and disaster relief category 
funding of $6,400,000,000 in the Department of Homeland Security 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division D of Public Law 113-6).

    Through the Disaster Relief Fund [DRF], the Department 
provides a significant portion of the total Federal response to 
victims in Presidentially declared major disasters and 
emergencies. Major disasters are declared when a State requests 
Federal assistance and proves that a given disaster is beyond 
the local and State capacity to respond. Under the DRF, FEMA 
will continue to operate the primary assistance programs, 
including Federal assistance to individuals and households; and 
public assistance, which includes the repair and reconstruction 
of State, local, and nonprofit infrastructure. The post-
disaster hazard mitigation set-aside to States, as part of the 
DRF, works as a companion piece to the National Predisaster 
Mitigation Fund.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    As requested, the Committee recommends $6,220,908,000 for 
the Disaster Relief Fund, of which $5,626,386,000 is provided 
under the disaster relief adjustment pursuant to Public Law 
112-25. The Committee is pleased the Department has requested 
amounts for the Disaster Relief Fund that more accurately 
reflect, based on documented claims and historic evidence, the 
disaster needs that are likely to arise during this fiscal 
year, including the costs of previously designated disasters.
    The Committee includes bill language requiring an 
expenditure plan and quarterly reports for disaster readiness 
and support costs; and a monthly report on disaster relief 
expenditures. The Committee recommends bill language 
transferring $24,000,000 to the Department of Homeland Security 
Office of Inspector General for audits and investigations.
    The Committee notes a provision included under the heading 
``Disaster Relief Fund'' in Division A of Public Law 113-2, 
Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013, requiring FEMA to 
post on its Web site the Disaster Relief Fund Monthly Report 
within 10 days after the first day of each month and encourages 
FEMA to post the report as soon as practicable.
    The Committee directs FEMA to report on the progress made 
addressing the recommendations contained in GAO-12-838 
``Federal Disaster Assistance: Improved Criteria Needed to 
Assess a Jurisdiction's Capability to Respond and Recover on 
Its Own''.

                     DISASTER RECOVERY EXPENDITURES

    The Committee supports the critical role OIG has in 
eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse in disaster assistance 
programs. Further, the Committee notes that it is imperative 
for FEMA to make decisions on recovery assistance in a timely 
fashion, often with limited information in a chaotic post-
disaster environment. However, the Committee is concerned that 
the OIG execution of their role and a lack of clarity and 
consistency in FEMA policy and program execution are adversely 
affecting some Public Assistance applicants. In June 2012, OIG 
recommended that a grantee repay a Federal grant already 
awarded and obligated when it determined that FEMA incorrectly 
applied its regulations and policies for a disaster that 
occurred in June 2008. FEMA argued that deobligation of the 
project was not warranted since the evidence of substantial 
damage as a result of the disaster supported Federal assistance 
for the community's recovery. The unresolved matter was sent to 
the DHS Under Secretary for Management for final adjudication. 
The determination was the grantee did not have to repay the 
Federal grant since disaster damage warranted assistance. The 
Committee is concerned that the OIG Office of Emergency 
Management Oversight focus on ``after the fact'' reviews is not 
efficiently placed to prevent obligation of misused Federal 
funds and therefore causes unnecessary disruption for 
recovering communities by recommending deobligation several 
years afterwards.
    The Committee is mindful that the OIG review of disaster 
obligations is often several years after a disaster and the 
impact of the findings can have a severe effect on a community 
that has already obligated funding to specific projects with 
FEMA's approval in an effort to recover. While it is imperative 
for FEMA policies and rules to be transparent; reasonably 
flexible to accommodate various recovery scenarios; and 
consistently applied, where appropriate; the sheer volume of 
OIG recommendations may challenge FEMA's capacity to execute 
meaningful and responsive policy changes. FEMA has concurred 
with a separate OIG finding that the Agency needs a significant 
review and revision of certain policies and methods of 
implementing rules and is currently undergoing a process to do 
so. The Committee expects this process to continue without 
delay. Further, the Committee expects FEMA and the OIG to 
partner fully in this process.
    The Administrator and the Inspector General are directed to 
provide a report to the Committee, no later than 120 days after 
the date of enactment of this act, outlining improvements that 
will be made by both OIG and FEMA to better implement disaster 
recovery programs and guard against waste, fraud, and abuse.

                 FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING AND RISK ANALYSIS

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     $95,203,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      84,361,000
House allowance.........................................      95,202,000
Committee recommendation................................      95,203,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    This appropriation supports the functions necessary to 
develop, and keep current, flood risk information and flood 
maps. The flood maps are used to determine appropriate risk-
based premium rates for the National Flood Insurance Program, 
to complete flood hazard determinations required of the 
Nation's lending institutions, and to develop appropriate 
disaster response plans for Federal, State, and local emergency 
management personnel.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $95,203,000 for Flood Hazard 
Mapping and Risk Analysis, $10,842,000 above the amount 
requested and the same amount as provided in fiscal year 2013. 
To date, only 58 percent of flood maps have been updated with 
the most current data.
    Maintaining the Nation's flood maps is an important task to 
ensure citizens know their risk and communities can make wise 
decisions about mitigation activities. It is critical that FEMA 
continue to work with the Army Corps of Engineers and the 
Technical Mapping Advisory Council to ensure the highest 
quality data and information is included in digital maps that 
are reliable and useful. The Committee notes FEMA's recent 
release of the Levee Analysis and Mapping Procedures for Non-
Accredited Levees [LAMP] and the ongoing establishment of pilot 
projects in areas throughout the country to account for flood 
protection that may not be reflected on current flood maps. 
FEMA is directed to continue working with communities on the 
best way to reflect infrastructure that provides varying levels 
of mitigation against flooding on flood maps.
    On March 20, 2013, the National Academy of Sciences issued 
a report on ``Levees and the National Flood Insurance Program: 
Improving Policies and Practices'' commissioned by FEMA. The 
study concluded ``at this time there is no sound reason to 
extend the mandatory purchase requirement--which requires 
property owners with a federally backed mortgage located in the 
100-year floodplain to purchase flood insurance--to areas 
behind accredited levees.'' The Committee notes the study 
recommended that FEMA develop modern flood risk analysis tools, 
but that the study did not analyze the cost of acquiring such 
tools. The Administrator is directed to provide, within a year 
of the date of enactment of this act, an initial assessment of 
the projected timeline and potential cost of acquiring the 
modern flood risk analysis tools referenced in this study.
    The Committee directs the United States Army Corps of 
Engineers [USACE] and the DHS to ensure the plain language of 
the levee accreditation provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood 
Insurance Reform and Modernization Act are met. The Committee 
expects a July 2013 delivery of the Flood Protection Structure 
Accreditation Task Force report that was required by the 
Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act.

                     NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE FUND

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\..............................    $171,000,000
Budget estimate, 2014\2\................................     176,300,000
House allowance\2\......................................     176,300,000
Committee recommendation\2\.............................     176,300,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Fully offset by fee collection.

    The National Flood Insurance Fund is a fee-generated fund 
which provides funding for the National Flood Insurance 
Program. This program enables property owners to purchase flood 
insurance otherwise unavailable in the commercial market. The 
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 authorizes the Federal 
Government to provide flood insurance on a national basis. This 
insurance is available to communities which enact and enforce 
appropriate floodplain management measures and covers virtually 
all types of buildings and their contents up to $350,000 for 
residential types and $1,000,000 for all other types.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $176,300,000, as proposed in the 
budget, for the National Flood Insurance Fund, of which 
$40,000,000 is for expenses under section 1366 of the National 
Flood Insurance Act (42 U.S.C. 4104c) to provide assistance 
planning to States and communities for implementing floodplain 
management measures to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk 
of flood damage to buildings and other structures eligible for 
insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program.
    The Committee directs the Administrator of the National 
Flood Insurance Program to develop procedures within 180 days 
of the date of enactment of this act to provide information to 
policyholders related to the Community Rating System, including 
their community's participation status and score under the 
program. This information is to be provided to policyholders 
not less than one time each year as an enclosure with their 
annual policy statement and should also be made easily 
available to policyholders online.
    The Committee is extremely disappointed that FEMA has still 
not completed the affordability study and report required by 
section 100236 of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act 
of 2012 (Public Law 112-141) and has consequently failed to 
meet the statutory deadline established by Congress. The 
Administrator is directed to dedicate sufficient resources to 
expedite their completion and submission.
    The Committee is aware that FEMA is in the process of 
producing a comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement for 
the National Flood Insurance Program. The Committee directs 
FEMA to ensure that it proactively solicits and considers input 
from those parties potentially affected by this process.
    Within 1 year of enactment, the Administrator shall conduct 
a study assessing the feasibility of waiver authority for 
floodplain management requirements within an area designated as 
Zone V1-30, VE, or V on a National Flood Insurance Program rate 
map. The study shall include an evaluation of: (1) whether 
construction could withstand wave and wind forces acting 
simultaneously on building components, currents, and debris 
impact associated with the base flood and not increase the 
elevation of the base flood on structures or cause an increase 
in wave forces or transportation of shore materials on 
structures; (2) whether construction could increase the water 
surface elevation of the base flood; and (3) whether proposed 
fill could increase the elevation of the base flood and whether 
it could erode. Additionally, the study shall evaluate the 
appropriateness of limiting the waivers to locations where: (1) 
the main flooding source is wave overtopping of the upland and 
is not surge inundation; and (2) the breaking wave height in 
the base flood is between 3 and 10 feet.

                  NATIONAL PREDISASTER MITIGATION FUND

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     $24,967,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................................
House allowance.........................................      30,155,000
Committee recommendation................................      25,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The National Predisaster Mitigation [PDM] Fund provides 
grants to States, communities, territories, and Indian tribal 
governments for hazard mitigation planning and implementing 
mitigation projects prior to a disaster event. PDM grants are 
awarded on a competitive basis. This program operates 
independent of the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, funded 
through the Disaster Relief Fund, which provides grants to a 
State in which a disaster has been declared.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $25,000,000 for PDM, $25,000,000 
above the amount requested and $33,000 above the amount 
provided in fiscal year 2013. The Committee continues to 
support predisaster mitigation, and recognizes the importance 
of coordinating predisaster mitigation projects with projects 
being completed through the post-disaster Hazard Mitigation 
Grant Program. The Committee is concerned that eliminating 
funding for PDM, as the Administration requested, will leave 
some States with no mitigation planning or project funding. The 
Committee does not include a provision requested in the budget 
which would rescind previous PDM projects, as no eligible funds 
for such rescission could be identified.

                       EMERGENCY FOOD AND SHELTER

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $119,842,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     100,000,000
House allowance.........................................     120,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     120,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    This appropriation funds grants to nonprofit and faith-
based organizations at the local level to supplement their 
programs for emergency food and shelter to provide for the 
immediate needs of the homeless.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $120,000,000 for Emergency Food 
and Shelter, which is $20,000,000 above the amount requested 
and $158,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. The 
Committee continues to support the Emergency Food and Shelter 
Program, and recognizes it as one program, in conjunction with 
other Federal programs, that serves those in immediate need of 
food and shelter assistance. This funding helped provide 
63,008,930 meals, 4,526,353 nights of lodging, 63,401 rent and 
mortgage payments, and 158,574 utility payments for people in 
need in fiscal year 2011.

                                TITLE IV

            RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, TRAINING, AND SERVICES

           United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $111,776,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     124,213,000
House allowance.........................................     114,213,000
Committee recommendation................................     118,889,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    United States Citizenship and Immigration Services [USCIS] 
funds expenses necessary for the administration of laws and the 
provision of services related to people seeking to enter, 
reside, work, and naturalize in the United States. In addition 
to directly appropriated resources, fee collections are 
available for the operations of USCIS.
    Immigration Examinations Fees.--USCIS collects fees from 
persons applying for immigration benefits to support the 
adjudication of applications, as authorized by the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1356).
    H1-B and L Fraud Prevention and Detection Fees.--USCIS 
collects fees from petitioners seeking a beneficiary's initial 
grant of H1-B or L nonimmigrant classification or those 
petitioners seeking to change a beneficiary's employer within 
those classifications (Public Law 108-447).
    H1-B Nonimmigrant Petitioner Fees.--USCIS collects fees 
from petitioners using the H1-B program (Public Law 108-447).

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends total resources of $3,219,142,000 
including direct appropriations of $118,889,000 and estimated 
fee collections of $3,100,253,000. This is $324,000 below the 
amount requested and $224,909,000 above the amount provided in 
fiscal year 2013.
    The following table, which includes appropriations and 
estimated fee collections, summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                       UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES--PROGRAM SUMMARY
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Fiscal year     Fiscal year
                                                                  2013 enacted     2014 budget      Committee
                                                                       \1\           request     recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appropriations:
    E-Verify...................................................         111,776         114,213          113,889
    Immigrant Integration Programs.............................  ..............          10,000            5,000
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
      Total, Appropriations....................................         111,776         124,213          118,889
                                                                ================================================
Fee collections:
    Adjudication services (fee account):
        District operations....................................       1,313,702       1,510,836        1,541,880
        Service Center operations..............................         524,788         550,653          578,393
        Asylum, Refugee and international operations...........         196,584         236,494          236,710
        Records operations.....................................          86,774          94,039           94,039
        Business transformation................................         269,216         183,464          183,464
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Adjudication services..........................       2,391,064       2,575,486        2,634,486
                                                                ================================================
Information and customer services (fee account): Information             89,011          96,409           96,409
 and customer services.........................................
Administration (fee account): Operation expenses...............         382,334         339,421          339,421
SAVE (fee account).............................................          20,048          29,937           29,937
H1-B visa fee account..........................................  ..............          13,000  ...............
H1-B and L Fraud Prevention Account............................  ..............          41,000  ...............
                                                                ------------------------------------------------
      Total, fee collections...................................       2,882,457       3,095,253        3,100,253
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                                E-VERIFY

    The Committee recommends $113,889,000 for E-Verify program 
activities, $324,000 below the amount requested and $2,113,000 
above the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. The Committee 
supports E-Verify and the effort the Department is performing 
to improve E-Verify's ability to automatically verify those who 
are work authorized, detect identity fraud, and detect system 
misuse and discrimination. E-Verify is both a tool for 
employers committed to maintaining a legal workforce and a 
deterrent to illegal immigration. The Committee notes progress 
continues to be made on reducing the mismatch rate.
    The growth in E-Verify use by employers has significantly 
increased from fewer than 25,000 employers in fiscal year 2007 
to more than 447,000 as of April 2013, with an average of more 
than 1,000 new employers enrolling per week. E-Verify processed 
21 million cases in fiscal year 2012, a more than five-fold 
increase from the 4.0 million cases processed in fiscal year 
2007. So far in fiscal year 2013, E-Verify processed more than 
13 million cases.
    The Committee directs USCIS to create a mobile application 
and use other available smart-phone technology for employers 
using E-Verify so as to encourage small employers to use the 
system as early as possible. Additionally, USCIS shall, in 
consultation with the Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration, make available marketing and other incentives 
to small business concerns to encourage small employers to use 
E-Verify.

                   E-VERIFY IN AGRICULTURAL SETTINGS

    The Committee is aware of challenges associated with 
implementing E-Verify in its current form in the agricultural 
industry, and directs USCIS to report to the Senate Committees 
on Appropriations and the Judiciary within 120 days after the 
enactment of this act on the progress of implementing the USCIS 
Self Check service, improving the linkage between E-Verify and 
the Arrival and Departure Information System, and developing a 
mobile service model that will provide all employers a 
different method to access E-Verify, including the development 
of a mobile app. The report should address the manner in which 
these improvements will be employed; how they will reduce the 
burden on agricultural employers and employees; and a specific 
date by which the program(s) will be in full effect.

                      IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION GRANTS

    The Committee recommends $5,000,000 for Immigrant 
Integration Grants in direct appropriations and includes a 
general provision directing that an additional $5,000,000 be 
made available for these grants via fees. The grants shall be 
available to assist individuals who are legally authorized to 
be present in the United States. The Committee believes it is 
important to assist individuals following the law and working 
to become citizens.

                           E-B5 VISA PROGRAM

    The Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration 
Services is directed to provide a report to the committee on 
the E-B5 visa program within 90 days of the date of enactment 
of this act, and every 180 days thereafter, that includes the 
number of applications pending, the period of time each 
application has been under review, benchmark review periods for 
the economic evaluation of projects and suitability of 
petitioners, a description of any additional resources 
necessary to efficiently administer the program, and the number 
of applications that are approved or denied each period with an 
accompanying explanation of their disposition.

                      FIELD OFFICE FACILITY MODELS

    The Committee understands that USCIS is currently revising 
its field office facilities model and developing new facilities 
models for service centers, call centers, and asylum offices. 
The Committee supports efforts to develop effective facility 
models that encourage each service center to centralize its 
operations into a single headquarters campus in their original 
location and that are consistent with the Administration's 
efforts to enhance the efficiency of the overall Federal real 
estate portfolio. The Committee directs USCIS to submit a 
report by January 31, 2014, describing the new facility model 
for service centers and detailing how existing service centers 
could be impacted by revisions.

                         REPORTING REQUIREMENT

    In order to provide better feedback to small employers and 
others throughout the H1-B application process, it is important 
that USCIS, to the extent practicable, create an online 
interface. The Committee directs USCIS to submit an annual 
report that includes: the number of H1-B visa applications 
received and visas granted broken down by business size (0-25 
employees, 26-50 employees, 50-100 employees, 100-500 
employees, and more than 500 employees) and also expressed as a 
percentage of the total; the number of H1-B visa applications 
broken down by North American Industry Classification System 
Code; and the number and percentage of businesses--broken down 
by business size--that utilized the Premium Processing Service 
and received a visa compared with those businesses that did not 
utilize the service.

                Federal Law Enforcement Training Center

                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $228,166,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     240,544,000
House allowance.........................................     227,845,000
Committee recommendation................................     227,845,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center [FLETC] 
Salaries and Expenses appropriation provides funds for basic 
and some advanced training to Federal law enforcement personnel 
from more than 90 agencies. This account also allows for 
research of new training methodologies; provides for training 
to certain State, local, and foreign law enforcement personnel 
on a space-available basis; and accreditation of Federal law 
enforcement training programs.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $227,845,000 for Salaries and 
Expenses, $12,699,000 below the amount requested and $321,000 
below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. Within the funds 
provided is $1,300,000 for the Federal Law Enforcement Training 
Accreditation Board. The requested amount includes reductions 
of $23,380,000 in identified efficiencies, an increase of 
$4,500,000 to expand active shooter threat training programs, 
and funds to phase-in 1,850 new CBP officers. The Committee 
denies the proposed transfer of the National Computer Forensics 
Institute from the U.S. Secret Service to FLETC. Funding for 
this activity is retained within the U.S. Secret Service's 
``Salaries and Expenses'' appropriation. The Committee also 
expects the Director to maintain training at or near capacity 
before entering into new leases with private contractors or 
establishing new partner organizations.

     ACQUISITIONS, CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENTS, AND RELATED EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     $28,348,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      30,885,000
House allowance.........................................      30,885,000
Committee recommendation................................      30,885,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    This account provides for the acquisition and related costs 
for expansion and maintenance of facilities of the Federal Law 
Enforcement Training Center. This includes construction and 
maintenance of facilities and environmental compliance. The 
environmental compliance funds ensure compliance with 
Environmental Protection Agency and State environmental laws 
and regulations.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $30,885,000 for Acquisition, 
Construction, Improvements, and Related Expenses, the same as 
the President's request and $2,537,000 above the amount 
provided in fiscal year 2013. Included in this amount is 
$1,500,000 to support the debt services payment on the Energy 
Savings Performance Contract. This contract will save FLETC an 
estimated $2,000,000 by implementing a series of energy 
conservation measures associated with water, lighting, heating, 
and cooling. In addition, FLETC will avoid paying up to 
$2,500,000 in energy costs due to the installation of 
photovoltaic equipment at its Cheltenham facility.

                         Science and Technology

                                SUMMARY

    The mission of Science and Technology [S&T] is to conduct, 
stimulate, and enable homeland security research, development, 
testing, and to facilitate the timely transition of 
capabilities to Federal, State, local, and tribal end-users.

                     MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $131,826,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     129,608,000
House allowance.........................................     129,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     129,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Management and Administration account funds salaries 
and expenses related to the Office of the Under Secretary for 
Science and Technology, and headquarters.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $129,000,000 for Management and 
Administration of programs and activities carried out by S&T. 
This is $608,000 below the amount requested and $2,826,000 
below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. Of this amount, 
the Committee recommends not to exceed $7,650 for official 
reception and representation expenses.

           RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, ACQUISITION, AND OPERATIONS

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\..............................    $705,791,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................   1,397,488,000
House allowance.........................................   1,096,488,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,089,488,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $3,249,000 in the Disaster Relief 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

    Science and Technology supports the mission of DHS through 
basic and applied research, fabrication of prototypes, research 
and development to mitigate the effects of weapons of mass 
destruction, as well as acquiring and field testing equipment.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $1,089,488,000 for Research, 
Development, Acquisition, and Operations of S&T. This is 
$308,000,000 below the amount requested and $383,697,000 above 
the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    The Committee does not support the consolidation of all 
research funding into one account, as it reduces transparency 
and accountability of S&T's primary research funding. 
Therefore, the Committee modifies the requested budget 
structure by including the six research areas identified in the 
budget request as PPAs under Research Development and 
Innovation [RD&I]: Apex Research and Development [R&D]; Border 
Security; Chemical, Biological, and Explosives Defense; Counter 
Terrorist R&D; Cybersecurity; and Disaster Resilience.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, ACQUISITION, AND OPERATIONS
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Research, Development, and Innovation.....................           449,960           467,000  ................
RD&I: Apex R&D............................................  ................  ................            15,013
RD&I: Border Security.....................................  ................  ................            43,563
RD&I: Chem/Bio/Radiological/Nuclear/Explosives Defense....  ................  ................           182,611
RD&I: Counter Terrorist R&D...............................  ................  ................            24,561
RD&I: Cybersecurity.......................................  ................  ................            74,529
RD&I: Disaster Resilience.................................  ................  ................           126,723
Laboratory Facilities (operations and construction).......           164,714           857,785           547,785
Acquisition and Operations Support........................            47,921            41,703            41,703
University Programs.......................................            39,947            31,000            33,000
Emergency Appropriations (Public Law 113-2)...............             3,249  ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Research, Development, Acquisition and                  705,791         1,397,488         1,089,488
       Operations.........................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                         REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

    S&T is directed to continue to provide the following:
  --quarterly briefings to the Committee on the test and 
        evaluation status of all level 1 acquisitions;
  --a report on results of its research and development for the 
        prior fiscal year; and
  --a report on the amounts de-obligated from projects during 
        the prior fiscal year and to what projects those funds 
        were subsequently obligated.
    The reports listed above are to be submitted in conjunction 
with the fiscal year 2015 President's budget request. Further, 
the report on the results of research and development should 
detail all technologies, technology improvements, or 
capabilities delivered to front line users.

                                APEX R&D

    The recommendation continues to fund S&T's Apex Research 
and Development program, which is focused on high-priority and 
high-value projects needed in a short turn-around for DHS 
components. Unlike other S&T research initiatives, Apex 
projects are collaborative efforts between DHS component heads 
and the Under Secretary for S&T. The Committee is supportive of 
the Apex concept, especially since it is focused on expediting 
technology solutions to the field. S&T and the partner 
components are to brief the Committee no later than 60 days 
after the date of enactment of this act and periodically 
thereafter on: the funding allocation by project; and progress 
made to field improved technologies, including a schedule for 
evaluation and testing of technical solutions in relevant 
operational environments.

                           INDUSTRY OUTREACH

    The Committee is concerned that there is not a clear path 
to bring innovative security technologies to the attention of 
Department decision makers, which may result in creative, cost-
effective homeland security technology solutions being missed. 
S&T must leverage investments made by the private sector to 
speed new technologies to operational use, especially in 
critical areas like border security. In consultation with the 
Office of the Private Sector, S&T is to submit a report not 
later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this act, 
detailing efforts the agency is making to identify innovative 
technologies developed by industry, other Federal agencies, and 
universities that could improve the effectiveness, efficiency, 
and safety of DHS missions. The report shall detail S&T's 
mechanisms to reach outside of the Department to forge possible 
collaborations with industry, government, and academia to meet 
DHS mission needs. In addition, the report shall discuss the 
ways in which companies and organizations can ``reach in'' and 
present S&T with potential technologies for investment, 
including the process used to determine if a technology is to 
be pursued or not.

          RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT AND COORDINATION

    The Government Accountability Office reported in September 
2012 (GAO-12-837) that DHS does not have a department-wide 
policy defining research and development or guidance directing 
components how to report R&D activities. The concern raised by 
GAO is that without such guidance and direction, the Department 
is unable to know its overall investment in R&D, which limits 
oversight and does not allow for department-wide goals to be 
properly aligned. This may result in DHS-wide R&D efforts that 
are fragmented, overlapping, and duplicative. In response to 
GAO's concerns, DHS indicated that it is considering a 
management directive, multi-component steering committee, or 
new policy guidance to better oversee and coordinate R&D. 
Unfortunately, action on these efforts to date has been minimal 
at best. Therefore, in accordance with GAO's recommendations, 
the Committee directs DHS to implement policies and guidance 
for defining and overseeing R&D department-wide no later than 
120 days after the date of enactment of this act.
    In an effort to assist in the coordination of R&D work 
across the Department, the Committee directed DHS and S&T last 
fiscal year to begin portfolio reviews of other components. 
Such reviews have been effective for S&T's own R&D portfolio to 
ensure that projects selected for funding are those that will 
have the greatest impact and opportunity for transition to 
operational use. Following the Committee's direction, the Coast 
Guard was the first DHS component to implement this review 
process, which will help shape and direct key technological 
research within the service to bring those efforts toward 
fruition. The Committee directs the Secretary to expeditiously 
continue the review process with other DHS components with the 
help and assistance from the Under Secretary for S&T to improve 
the coordinated approach to R&D and related activities within 
DHS. S&T is to brief the Committee on its schedule and plans 
for future reviews within DHS no later than 120 days after the 
date of enactment of this act.

                          DISASTER RESILIENCE

    Within the $126,723,000 provided for Disaster Resilience, 
the Committee encourages S&T to enhance Natural Disaster 
Resiliency projects that focus on dam or levee flood simulation 
and mapping systems that have demonstrated significant 
potential to be utilized as an emergency management tool for 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

                             CYBERSECURITY

    It is essential that DHS partner with private industry to 
create resilience to cyber conflict through war gaming and 
cyber exercise programs. The Committee supports the continued 
development of a simulation based cybersecurity exercise tool 
for the financial services sector and supports the further 
extension of the financial sector tool into other critical 
infrastructure sectors such as energy, the defense industrial 
base, transportation, and healthcare.
    The Committee recognizes the cyber threats to the Nation's 
electric grid and the other control systems vital to our 
security and economy. In order to address this challenge, the 
Committee encourages S&T, in collaboration with NPPD, to 
establish operational cybersecurity research initiatives. These 
initiatives should involve collaboration among academic 
institutions, existing Federal research and development 
organizations, and the private sector. Furthermore, the 
Committee recognizes the need to conduct experiments both at 
the lab scale and at real-world scale using test bed 
applications to verify models using a large-scale operational 
environment. The Committee urges the Department to address 
research, testing and education as part of this initiative.

                     CANINE STANDARDS AND PROTOCOLS

    Detection canine teams play a critical role in homeland 
security efforts and are a key tool used by a number of 
agencies within the Department. The Committee is concerned that 
no widely accepted standards or protocols exist on the 
breeding, training, conditioning and deployment of detection 
canine teams. Without these standards and protocols 
inconsistencies in the quality of the canine, the handler, or 
their training and deployment can significantly reduce their 
effectiveness. The Committee directs S&T to work with the 
National Institute of Standards and Technology [NIST] in 
conjunction with subject matter experts in academia, the 
private sector, and governmental stakeholders to develop 
breeding, training, conditioning and deployment standards and 
protocols for detection canine teams. The Committee believes 
the NIST standards and protocols effort can be best informed by 
a greater focus within S&T on research and development 
surrounding canine detection. S&T is directed to work with 
NIST, stakeholders, and institutions of higher education with 
specific expertise to develop a renewed focus on canine 
detection research and development that will address current 
issues and concerns.

           FIRST RESPONDER COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT STANDARDS

    S&T, in conjunction with the Director of NIST, shall 
continue assessing the compliance of first responder 
communication equipment with common standards for digital 
public safety radio communications (Project 25 standards).

                       TEST AND EVALUATION [T&E]

    Within the amount provided for the Acquisition and 
Operations Support PPA, no less than $5,339,000 shall be for 
S&T to establish policies and procedures for and to coordinate 
and monitor the T&E activities across the DHS acquisition 
framework. Testing and evaluation of new technologies prior to 
their acquisition and deployment will, in the long-run, save 
money through the prevention of wasteful spending.

                         LABORATORY FACILITIES

    The Committee recommendation includes $547,785,000 for 
Laboratory Facilities, $310,000,000 below the amount requested. 
A total of $404,000,000 is provided for the National Bio-Agro 
Defense Facility [NBAF]. While this amount is lower than the 
budget request, it is sufficient to ensure that construction of 
the facility proceeds on schedule and fully leverages the 
funding contributions by the State of Kansas. NBAF will support 
the complimentary missions of DHS and the United States 
Department of Agriculture and serve as the Nation's primary 
research facility to counter foreign animal diseases. The 
Committee directs S&T to submit a detailed update of its NBAF 
construction plan and schedule, to include an updated plan for 
the expenditure of funds, not later than 30 days after the date 
of enactment of this act.
    A total of $29,250,000 is provided for infrastructure 
upgrades to the Plum Island Animal Disease Center [PIADC]. 
While NBAF will replace PIADC, it will not become operational 
for several years. As a result, it is imperative to make 
critical upgrades at PIADC in order for scientists to continue 
research on contagious animal diseases that have the potential 
to impact America's food and livestock industries.

                          UNIVERSITY PROGRAMS

    The Committee recommendation includes $33,000,000 for 
University Programs, $2,000,000 above the amount requested. The 
Office of University Programs supports critical homeland 
security-related research and education at U.S. colleges and 
universities to address high-priority DHS-related issues and to 
enhance homeland security capabilities over the long term. The 
increase above the request is for the University Centers of 
Excellence program, either for existing centers or for the 
establishment of a new center. The recommendation also 
recognizes the requested reduction of $3,000,000 resulting from 
the consolidation of the Scholars and Fellows program within 
the National Science Foundation.

                   Domestic Nuclear Detection Office

                                SUMMARY

    The Domestic Nuclear Detection Office [DNDO] is responsible 
for development of technologies to detect and report attempts 
to import, possess, store, develop, or transport nuclear and 
radiological material.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $289,153,000 for activities of 
DNDO for fiscal year 2014. This is $2,167,000 below the amount 
requested and $32,230,000 below the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                        DOMESTIC NUCLEAR DETECTION OFFICE
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management and Administration.............................            39,598            37,510            37,353
Research, Development, and Operations.....................           226,529           211,210           209,200
Systems Acquisition\2\....................................            55,256            42,600            42,600
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Domestic Nuclear Detection Office............           321,383           291,320           289,153
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $3,869,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of
  Public Law 113-2).

                     MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................     $39,598,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      37,510,000
House allowance.........................................      37,353,000
Committee recommendation................................      37,353,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Management and Administration account funds salaries, 
benefits, and expenses for DNDO.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $37,353,000 for Management and 
Administration of programs and activities carried out by DNDO. 
This is $157,000 below the amount requested and $2,245,000 
below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013. Of this amount, 
the Committee recommends not to exceed $2,250 for official 
reception and representation expenses.

                     STRATEGIC PLAN OF INVESTMENTS

    The Committee includes bill language requiring DNDO to 
update its strategic plan of investments necessary to implement 
the Department's responsibilities under the domestic component 
of the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture. The plan is to:
  --identify the various elements of the domestic architecture 
        and the roles and responsibilities of each Departmental 
        entity;
  --investments being made in fiscal year 2014 and planned for 
        2015 to secure pathways into the United States (sea, 
        land, and air);
  --investments necessary to close known vulnerabilities and 
        gaps, including associated costs and timeframes, and 
        estimates of feasibility and cost effectiveness; and
  --how R&D funding is furthering the implementation of the 
        domestic architecture.
    While the strategic plan of investments is to cover the 
Department's implementation responsibilities, it shall include 
a section on DNDO's focus on surge capabilities and the ability 
of Federal, State, and local level assets to be mobilized 
together to respond to suspected radiological threats.

                 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND OPERATIONS

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................    $226,529,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................     211,210,000
House allowance.........................................     211,210,000
Committee recommendation................................     209,200,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.

    The Research, Development and Operations account funds the 
development of nuclear detection systems and the integration 
and advancement of national nuclear forensics capabilities.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $209,200,000 for Research, 
Development and Operations. This is $2,010,000 below the amount 
requested and $17,329,000 below the amount provided in fiscal 
year 2013.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                      RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND OPERATIONS
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Systems Engineering and Architecture......................            29,960            21,222            21,000
Systems Development.......................................            27,963            21,243            21,000
Transformational Research and Development.................            74,667            75,291            75,000
Assessments...............................................            32,956            39,918            39,300
Operations Support........................................            35,453            30,835            30,200
National Technical Nuclear Forensics Center...............            25,530            22,701            22,700
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Research, Development, and Operations........           226,529           211,210           209,200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                          SEMIANNUAL BRIEFINGS

    DNDO shall continue semi-annual briefings on program 
updates and provide periodic updates on any new threats, 
research, and studies and assessments related to the Global 
Nuclear Detection Architecture. Semiannual program briefings 
shall also cover emergent technology solutions being explored 
by DNDO.

                 RADIATION PORTAL MONITORS IMPROVEMENTS

    In fiscal year 2010, Congress appropriated $5,000,000 for 
DNDO to improve operations and capabilities of currently 
deployed polyvinyl toluene radiation portal monitors and 
handheld radiation detectors, and to deploy any improvements to 
the field. As a result of this funding, DNDO established a 
capability development plan and initiated a trade study in 
fiscal year 2012 that evaluated several algorithm improvements 
and a hardware improvement. According to DNDO, preliminary 
results from these efforts have shown promise and further 
evaluation of various solutions are currently being evaluated 
in the field. DNDO is to brief the Committee on the results of 
the evaluations no later than 45 days after the date of 
enactment of this act.

                 RADIATION PORTAL MONITORS REPLACEMENT

    Radiation Portal Monitors [RPMs] that have been deployed in 
the field over the past decade will start reaching the end of 
their useful life in the coming years and DNDO anticipates an 
increase in obsolescence. The Committee encourages DNDO to test 
new radiation detection technologies that would address the 
need to replace RPMs nearing the end of their service life, and 
to significantly improve screening efficiency at our Nation's 
ports. DNDO is to brief the Committee on its acquisition 
strategy for replacing RPMs no later than 120 days after the 
date of enactment of this act.

                          TEST AND EVALUATION

    Within the funding provided, the Department is expected to 
undertake a robust testing program to validate the potential 
benefits of commercial systems that can detect shielded nuclear 
material and have the potential to reduce the overall cost and 
time it takes to scan incoming cargo for hazardous materials. 
Such systems may be beneficial in addressing the 100 percent 
cargo scanning requirement.

                          SYSTEMS ACQUISITION

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\..............................     $55,256,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................      42,600,000
House allowance.........................................      42,600,000
Committee recommendation................................      42,600,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public 
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $3,869,000 in the Disaster Relief 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

    The Systems Acquisition account funds the acquisition of 
equipment for front line users across the Department.

                       COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Committee recommends $42,600,000 for Systems 
Acquisition. This is the same amount as requested and 
$12,656,000 below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013.
    The following table summarizes the Committee's 
recommendations as compared to the fiscal year 2013 and budget 
request levels:

                                               SYSTEMS ACQUISITION
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Fiscal year 2013  Fiscal year 2014      Committee
                                                               enacted\1\      budget request    recommendations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Radiation Portal Monitor Program..........................             1,353             7,000             7,000
Securing the Cities.......................................            21,971            22,000            22,000
Human Portable Radiation Detection Systems................            28,063            13,600            13,600
Emergency Appropriations (Public Law 113-2)...............             3,869  ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Systems Acquisition..........................            55,256            42,600            42,600
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112-25.

                       RADIATION PORTAL MONITORS

    The Committee recommendation includes $7,000,000 for the 
Radiation Portal Monitor program, as requested. Funds are 
provided to acquire and deploy radiation portal monitors to 
ports of entry as prioritized by CBP and DNDO.

                          SECURING THE CITIES

    The Committee recommendation includes $22,000,000 for 
Securing the Cities, as requested.

               HUMAN PORTABLE RADIATION DETECTION SYSTEMS

    The Committee recommendation includes $13,600,000 for the 
Human Portable Radiation Detection Systems program, as 
requested, to support the purchase of basic handhelds, 
backpacks, and personal radiation detectors for CBP, TSA, and 
the Coast Guard. DNDO is to provide the Committee with a 
multiyear procurement forecast and deployment schedule 
associated with these funds with the budget submission.

                                TITLE V

                           GENERAL PROVISIONS

                    (INCLUDING RESCISSIONS OF FUNDS)

    Section 501. The bill includes a provision that no part of 
any appropriation shall remain available for obligation beyond 
the current fiscal year unless expressly provided.
    Section 502. The bill includes a provision that unexpended 
balances of prior appropriations may be merged with new 
appropriations accounts and used for the same purpose, subject 
to reprogramming guidelines.
    Section 503. The bill includes a provision that provides 
authority to reprogram appropriations within an account and to 
transfer up to 5 percent between appropriations accounts with 
15-day advance notification of the Committees on 
Appropriations. A detailed funding table identifying each 
congressional control level for reprogramming purposes is 
included at the end of this statement. These reprogramming 
guidelines shall be complied with by all departmental 
components funded by this act.
    The Committee expects the Department to submit 
reprogramming requests on a timely basis, and to provide 
complete explanations of the reallocations proposed, including 
detailed justifications of the increases and offsets, and any 
specific impact the proposed changes will have on the budget 
request for the following fiscal year and future-year 
appropriations requirements. Each request submitted to the 
Committees should include a detailed table showing the proposed 
revisions at the account, program, project, and activity level 
to the funding and staffing (full-time equivalent) levels for 
the current fiscal year and to the levels required for the 
following fiscal year. The Committee continues to be 
disappointed by the quality, level of detail, and timeliness of 
the Department's proposed reprogrammings.
    The Committee expects the Department to manage its programs 
and activities within the levels appropriated. The Committee 
reminds the Department that reprogramming or transfer requests 
should be submitted only in the case of an unforeseeable 
emergency or situation that could not have been predicted when 
formulating the budget request for the current fiscal year. 
When the Department submits a reprogramming or transfer request 
to the Committees on Appropriations and does not receive 
identical responses from the House and Senate, it is the 
responsibility of the Department to reconcile the House and 
Senate differences before proceeding, and if reconciliation is 
not possible, to consider the reprogramming or transfer request 
unapproved.
    The Department shall not propose a reprogramming or 
transfer of funds after June 30 unless there are extraordinary 
circumstances, which place human lives or property in imminent 
danger. To the extent any reprogramming proposals are required; 
the Department is strongly encouraged to submit them well in 
advance of the June 30 deadline.
    Section 504. The bill includes a provision relating to the 
Department's Working Capital Fund [WCF] that: extends the 
authority of the Department's WCF in fiscal year 2014; 
prohibits funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the 
Department from being used to make payments to the WCF, except 
for the activities and amounts allowed in the President's 
fiscal year 2014 budget; makes WCF funds available until 
expended; ensures departmental components are only charged for 
direct usage of each WCF service; makes funds provided to the 
WCF available only for purposes consistent with the 
contributing component; requires the WCF to be paid in advance 
or reimbursed at rates which will return the full cost of each 
service; and subjects the WCF to the requirements of section 
503 of this act. The WCF table included in the Department's 
congressional justification accompanying the President's fiscal 
year 2014 budget shall serve as the control level for 
reprogramming and transfer purposes in compliance with section 
503 of this act.
    Section 505. The bill includes a provision that not to 
exceed 50 percent of unobligated balances remaining at the end 
of fiscal year 2014 from appropriations made for salaries and 
expenses shall remain available through fiscal year 2015, 
subject to reprogramming.
    Section 506. The bill includes a provision providing that 
funds for intelligence activities are specifically authorized 
during fiscal year 2014 until the enactment of an act 
authorizing intelligence activities for fiscal year 2014.
    Section 507. The bill includes a provision requiring 
notification to the Committees 3 business days before any grant 
allocation, grant award, contract award (including Federal 
Acquisition Regulation-covered contracts), other transaction 
agreement, a task or delivery order on a DHS multiple award 
contract, letter of intent, or public announcement of the 
intention to make such an award totaling in excess of 
$1,000,000. If the Secretary determines that compliance would 
pose substantial risk to health, human life, or safety, an 
award may be made without prior notification but the Committees 
shall be notified within 5 full business days after such award 
or letter is issued. Additionally, FEMA is required to brief 
the Committees 5 full business days prior to announcing 
publicly the intention to make an award under State and Local 
programs. The 3-day notification also pertains to task or 
delivery order awards greater than $10,000,000 from multiyear 
DHS funds or a task or delivery order that would cause 
cumulative obligations of multiyear funds in a single account 
to exceed 50 percent of the total amount appropriated as well 
as for any sole-source grant awards.
    Section 508. The bill includes a provision that no agency 
shall purchase, construct, or lease additional facilities for 
Federal law enforcement training without the advance approval 
of the Committees on Appropriations.
    Section 509. The bill includes a provision that none of the 
funds may be used for any construction, repair, alteration, or 
acquisition project for which a prospectus, if required under 
chapter 33 of title 40, United States Code, has not been 
approved. The bill excludes funds that may be required for 
development of a proposed prospectus.
    Section 510. The bill includes a provision that 
consolidates, continues, and modifies by reference prior-year 
statutory bill language into one provision. These provisions 
concern contracting officers' training and Federal building 
energy performance. The provision strikes a permanent 
requirement for a report related to Sensitive Security 
Information.
    Section 511. The bill includes a provision that none of the 
funds may be used in contravention of the Buy American Act.
    Section 512. The bill includes a provision prohibiting any 
person other than the privacy officer appointed under 
subsection (a) of section 222 of the Homeland Security Act of 
2002 to alter, direct that changes may be made, delay, or 
prohibit the transmission to Congress of any report prepared 
under paragraph (6) of such subsection.
    Section 513. The bill includes a provision prohibiting 
funds to be used to amend the oath of allegiance required by 
section 337 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1448).
    Section 514. The bill includes a provision requiring the 
Chief Financial Officer to submit monthly budget execution and 
staffing reports within 30 days after the close of each month.
    Section 515. The bill includes a provision that directs 
that any funds appropriated or transferred to TSA ``Aviation 
Security'', ``Administration'', and ``Transportation Security 
Support'' in fiscal years 2004 and 2005, which are recovered or 
deobligated shall be available only for procurement or 
installation of explosive detection systems, air cargo, 
baggage, and checkpoint screening systems, subject to 
notification. Quarterly reporting on these funds is required.
    Section 516. The bill includes a provision regarding 
competitive sourcing for United States Citizenship and 
Immigration Services.
    Section 517. The bill includes a provision requiring any 
funds appropriated to Coast Guard for 110-123 foot patrol boat 
conversions that are recovered, collected, or otherwise 
received as a result of negotiation, mediation, or litigation, 
shall be available until expended for the Fast Response Cutter 
program.
    Section 518. The bill includes a provision relating to 
undercover investigative operations authority of the Secret 
Service.
    Section 519. The bill includes a provision classifying the 
functions of instructor staff at FLETC as inherently 
governmental for purposes of the Federal Activities Inventory 
Reform Act of 1998.
    Section 520. The bill includes a provision requiring the 
Secretary to submit a report to the OIG listing all grants or 
contracts awarded by any means other than full and open 
competition. The OIG is required to review the report to assess 
Departmental compliance with applicable laws and regulations 
and report the results to the Committees on Appropriations no 
later than February 4, 2015.
    Section 521. The bill includes a provision that precludes 
DHS from using funds in this act to carry out reorganization 
authority. This prohibition is not intended to prevent the 
Department from carrying out routine or small reallocations of 
personnel or functions within components of the Department, 
subject to section 503 of this act.
    Section 522. The bill includes a provision prohibiting the 
Secretary of Homeland Security from reducing operations within 
the Coast Guard's Civil Engineering Program except as 
specifically authorized by a statute enacted after the date of 
enactment of this act.
    Section 523. The bill includes a provision prohibiting 
funding to grant an immigration benefit to any individual 
unless the results of background checks required by statute to 
be completed prior to the grant of a benefit have been received 
by DHS.
    Section 524. The bill includes a provision extending other 
transactional authority for DHS through fiscal year 2014.
    Section 525. The bill includes a provision requiring the 
Secretary to link all contracts that provide award fees to 
successful acquisition outcomes.
    Section 526. The bill includes a provision regarding 
waivers of the Jones Act.
    Section 527. The bill includes a provision prohibiting 
funds from being used to reduce the Coast Guard's Operations 
Systems Center mission or its government-employed or contract 
staff.
    Section 528. The bill includes a provision contained in 
Public Laws 109-295, 110-161, 110-329, 111-83, 112-10, 112-74, 
and 113-6 related to prescription drugs.
    Section 529. The bill includes a provision prohibiting 
funds to be used to conduct or implement the results of a 
competition under Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 
with respect to the Coast Guard National Vessel Documentation 
Center.
    Section 530. The bill includes a provision requiring the 
Secretary of Homeland Security, in conjunction with the 
Secretary of the Treasury, to notify the Committees on proposed 
transfers of surplus balances from the Department of the 
Treasury Forfeiture Fund to any agency within the Department of 
Homeland Security.
    Section 531. The bill includes a provision prohibiting 
funds from being used to plan, test, pilot, or develop a 
national identification card.
    Section 532. The bill includes a provision requiring the 
Administrator of TSA to certify that no security risks will 
result if an airport does not participate in the E-Verify 
program.
    Section 533. The bill includes a provision requiring a 
report summarizing damage assessment information used to 
determine whether to declare a major disaster.
    Section 534. The bill includes a provision directing that 
any official required by this act to report or certify to the 
Committees on Appropriations may not delegate such authority 
unless expressly authorized to do so in this act.
    Section 535. The bill includes a provision extending the 
risk-based security standards for chemical facilities cited in 
section 550 of Public Law 109-295, as amended, for 1 year.
    Section 536. The bill includes a provision extending 
current law concerning individuals detained at the Naval 
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
    Section 537. The bill includes a provision prohibiting 
funds in this act to be used for first-class travel.
    Section 538. The bill includes a provision prohibiting 
funds to be used to employ workers in contravention of section 
274A(h)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    Section 539. The bill includes a provision on the proper 
disposal of personal information collected through the 
Registered Traveler program.
    Section 540. The bill includes a provision prohibiting 
funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this act to 
pay for award or incentive fees for contractors with below 
satisfactory performance or performance that fails to meet the 
basic requirements of the contract.
    Section 541. The bill includes language that requires 
certification that the 100 percent screening of air cargo 
carried on passenger aircraft mandate contained in the 9/11 Act 
has been met and biannual reports on the strategy to meet this 
mandate if certification does not occur 180 days after the date 
of enactment of this act.
    Section 542. The bill includes language that requires the 
Secretary to ensure screening of passengers and crews for 
transportation and national security purposes are consistent 
with applicable laws, regulations, and guidance on privacy and 
civil liberties.
    Section 543. The bill includes a provision directing 
$5,000,000 in Immigration Examination Fees for the purpose of 
providing immigrant integration grants in fiscal year 2014.
    Section 544. The bill includes a provision providing some 
flexibility to the Department for financing a response to an 
immigration emergency.
    Section 545. The bill includes a provision prohibiting 
funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this act for 
DHS to enter into a Federal contract unless the contract meets 
requirements of the Federal Property and Administrative 
Services Act of 1949 or chapter 137 of title 10 U.S.C., and the 
Federal Acquisition Regulation, unless the contract is 
otherwise authorized by statute without regard to this section.
    Section 546. The bill includes a provision allowing the 
Secretary to transfer data center migration funds made 
available by this act between appropriations for the same 
purpose after notifying the Committees 15 days in advance. The 
bill provides an additional $54,200,000 for data center 
migration activities to be allocated by the Secretary pursuant 
to this section.
    Section 547. The bill provides a total of $43,300,000 for 
consolidation of a new DHS headquarters at St. Elizabeths and 
consolidation of mission support.
    Section 548. The bill includes a provision permitting the 
Department to sell ICE-owned detention facilities and use the 
proceeds from any sale for improvement to other facilities. ICE 
is required to notify the Committees on Appropriations 15 days 
prior to announcing any sale.
    Section 549. The Committee, in recognition of on-going 
fiscal distress in local communities, provides the Secretary 
with discretion to waive certain requirements of the Federal 
Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974, including a provision 
which allows grants to be used to retain firefighters, instead 
of only for increasing the number of firefighters. The 
Committee expects that the Secretary will take into 
consideration economic hardship when exercising the waiver 
authority.
    Section 550. The bill includes a provision prohibiting the 
availability of funds in this act for the Association of 
Community Organizations for Reform Now [ACORN] and its 
affiliated organizations.
    Section 551. The bill includes language directing CBP, ICE, 
United States Secret Service and the Office of Biometric 
Identity Management to submit a multiyear investment and 
management plan for all information technology programs and 
procurements.
    Section 552. The bill includes language stating that the 
Secretary shall ensure enforcement of all immigration laws.
    Section 553. The bill includes a provision regarding 
Federal network security.
    Section 554. The bill includes a provision regarding 
restrictions on electronic access to pornography, except for 
law enforcement purposes.
    Section 555. The bill includes a provision requested 
authorizing CBP to enter into not more than five reimbursable 
fee agreements for the provision of CBP services and any other 
costs incurred by CBP relating to such services. Current 
statutory limitations on CBP's authority to receive outside 
funding, except in narrowly defined instances, have prevented 
CBP from receiving reimbursement from private sector and 
international, State, and local partners. Only payment of 
overtime can be reimbursed at air facilities. No authority in 
this section can be used to provide CBP services outside of the 
United States. Funds collected pursuant to this section shall 
be deposited as offsetting collections and remain available 
until expended, without fiscal year limitation. They can be 
used to pay for any expenses incurred by CBP in providing CBP 
services and any other costs incurred by CBP relating to such 
services.
    The Committee expects this provision to be used on a 
limited basis, noting that when it is exercised, CBP should 
deduct user fees collected from the total amount charged for 
services so not to be compensated twice per inspection. CBP 
shall notify the relevant Committees 15 days before entering 
into such agreement and shall provide semiannual reports to the 
Committees on Appropriations on each request received, the 
reasons for its approval or denial, the anticipated and actual 
revenue received, and the service provided, including number of 
CBP officers funded. Language is included prohibiting the CBP 
Commissioner from entering into an agreement if it would 
negatively impact or alter services at an existing facility.
    Section 556. The bill includes a provision regarding the 
transfer of an operable firearm by a Federal law enforcement 
officer to an agent of a drug cartel.
    Section 557. The bill includes a provision prohibiting any 
funds from this or any other Act to be used for creation of the 
National Preparedness Grant Program or any successor grant 
program unless explicitly authorized by Congress.
    Section 558. The bill includes a provision prohibiting 
funds made available by this act to reimburse any Federal 
department or agency for its participation in a NSSE.
    Section 559. The bill includes language regarding the 
number of employees permitted to attend international 
conferences.
    Section 560. The bill includes a provision requiring the 
Secretary to submit annual reports to the DHS OIG on costs and 
contract procedures related to conferences costing in excess of 
$100,000. In addition, the OIG shall be notified within 15 days 
after the date of the conference being held for which the costs 
exceed $20,000.
    Section 561. A provision is included related to section 
1308(h) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 
4015 (h)).
    Section 562. A provision is included establishing a pilot 
program for relocation of certain facilities subject to flood 
risk.
    Section 563. The bill includes a provision pertaining to 
the temporary re-employment of administrative law judges for 
arbitration dispute resolution.
    Section 564. The bill includes a provision clarifying that 
fees collected pursuant to Columbia Free Trade Agreement are 
available until expended.
    Section 565. The bill includes a provision related to the 
immigration user fee.
    Section 566. The bill includes a provision on donations for 
land ports of entry facilities.
    Section 567. The bill includes a provision that prohibits 
the collection of new land border fees or the study of the 
imposition of such border fee.
    Section 568. The bill includes a provision modifying the 
Visa Waiver Program to permit the entry of additional member 
countries based on adjusting the criteria for visa refusal 
rates if a country has a low visa overstay rate while 
maintaining the security requirements of the Visa Waiver 
Program.
    Section 569. The bill includes a provision that allows the 
Commissioner of CBP to waive a reimbursement claim from 2009 
for the Office of the Federal Coordinator for Gulf Coast 
Rebuilding.
    Section 570. The bill includes a provision rescinding 
unobligated balances of prior year appropriations from the 
Coast Guard, Transportation Security Administration, and U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection.
    Section 571. The bill includes rescissions of prior year 
balances from funds transferred to the Department when it was 
created in 2003.
    Section 572. The bill rescinds $100,000,000 from the 
unobligated balances in the Department of the Treasury 
Forfeiture Fund.

                     PROGRAM, PROJECT, AND ACTIVITY

    In fiscal year 2014, for purposes of the Balanced Budget 
and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99-177), 
as amended, the following information provides the definition 
of the term ``program, project, and activity'' for the 
components of the Department of Homeland Security under the 
jurisdiction of the Homeland Security Subcommittee of the 
Committee on Appropriations. The term ``program, project, and 
activity'' shall include the most specific level of budget 
items identified in the Department of Homeland Security 
Appropriations Act, 2014, the House and Senate Committee 
reports, and the conference report and the accompany joint 
explanatory statement of the managers of the committee of 
conference.
    If a percentage reduction is necessary, in implementing 
that reduction, components of the Department of Homeland 
Security shall apply any percentage reduction required for 
fiscal year 2014 to all items specified in the justifications 
submitted to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and 
the House of Representatives in support of the fiscal year 2014 
budget estimates, as amended, for such components, as modified 
by congressional action.

  COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports 
accompanying general appropriations bills identify each 
recommended amendment which proposes an item of appropriation 
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing 
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously 
passed by the Senate during that session.
    The Committee recommends funding for the following programs 
or activities which currently lack authorization for fiscal 
year 2014:
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection: Salaries and Expenses; 
Automation Modernization; Border Security Fencing, 
Infrastructure, and Technology; Air and Marine Operations; and 
Construction and Facilities Management.
    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement: Salaries and 
Expenses; Automation Modernization; and Construction.
    Transportation Security Administration: Aviation Security; 
Surface Transportation Security; Transportation Threat 
Assessment and Credentialing; Transportation Security Support; 
and Federal Air Marshals.
    Coast Guard: Operating Expenses; Environmental Compliance 
and Restoration; Reserve Training; Acquisition, Construction, 
and Improvements; Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation; 
and Retired Pay.
    United States Secret Service: Salaries and Expenses and 
Acquisition, Construction, Improvements and Related Expenses.
    National Protection and Programs Directorate: Management 
and Administration
    Office of Health Affairs
    Federal Emergency Management Agency: Salaries and Expenses; 
State and Local Programs; Emergency Management Performance 
Grants; and Disaster Relief Fund.
    United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(c), RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 18, 2013, 
the Committee ordered favorably reported, en bloc, an original 
bill (S. 1329) making appropriations for the Departments of 
Commerce and Justice, and Science, and Related Agencies for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, and for other purposes, 
and a bill (H.R. 2217) making appropriations for the Department 
of Homeland Security for the year ending September 30, 2014, 
and for other purposes, with an amendment in the nature of a 
substitute, provided, that each bill be subject to amendment, 
or further amendment, and that each bill be consistent with the 
subcommittee funding guidance, by a recorded vote of 21-9, a 
quorum being present. The vote was as follows:
        Yeas                          Nays
Chairwoman Mikulski                 Mr. Shelby
Mr. Leahy                           Mr. McConnell
Mr. Harkin                          Mr. Alexander
Mrs. Murray                         Mr. Graham
Mrs. Feinstein                      Mr. Coats
Mr. Durbin                          Mr. Blunt
Mr. Johnson                         Mr. Hoeven
Ms. Landrieu                        Mr. Johanns
Mr. Reed                            Mr. Boozman
Mr. Pryor
Mr. Tester
Mr. Udall
Mrs. Shaheen
Mr. Merkley
Mr. Begich
Mr. Coons
Mr. Cochran
Ms. Collins
Ms. Murkowski
Mr. Kirk
Mr. Moran

 COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports 
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute 
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or 
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a 
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution 
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof 
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and 
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical 
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the 
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by 
the committee.''
    In compliance with this rule, changes in existing law 
proposed to be made by the bill are shown as follows: existing 
law to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets; new matter is 
printed in italic; and existing law in which no change is 
proposed is shown in roman.

                       TITLE 6--DOMESTIC SECURITY

               Chapter 1--Homeland Security Organization

  Subchapter VIII--Coordination With Non-Federal Entities; Inspector 
 General; United States Secret Service; Coast Guard; General Provisions

                          PART D--ACQUISITIONS

Sec. 391. Research and development projects

(a) Authority

    [Until September 30, 2013] Until September 30, 2014, and 
subject to subsection (d), the Secretary may carry out a pilot 
program under which the Secretary may exercise the following 
authorities:

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

(c) Additional requirements

    (1) In general

            The authority of the Secretary under this section 
        shall terminate [September 30, 2013] September 30, 
        2014, unless before that date the Secretary--
                                ------                                

                    TITLE 8--ALIENS AND NATIONALITY

                CHAPTER 12--IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY

                       SUBCHAPTER II--IMMIGRATION

    Part II--Admission Qualifications For Aliens; Travel Control of 
                          Citizens and Aliens

Sec. 1187. Visa waiver program for certain visitors

(a) Establishment of program

    The [Attorney General] Secretary of Homeland Security and 
the Secretary of State are authorized to establish a program 
(hereinafter in this section referred to as the ``program'') 
under which the requirement of paragraph (7)(B)(i)(II) of 
section 1182(a) of this title may be waived by the [Attorney 
General] Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with 
the Secretary of State and in accordance with this section, in 
the case of an alien who meets the following requirements:

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

        (1) Seeking entry as tourist for 90 days or less

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

        (4) Executes immigration forms

            The alien before the time of such admission 
        completes such immigration form as the [Attorney 
        General] Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
        establish.

        (5) Entry into the United States

            If arriving by sea or air, the alien arrives at the 
        port of entry into the United States on a carrier, 
        including any carrier conducting operations under part 
        135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, or a 
        noncommercial aircraft that is owned or operated by a 
        domestic corporation conducting operations under part 
        91 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations\1\ which 
        has entered into an agreement with the [Attorney 
        General] Secretary of Homeland Security pursuant to 
        subsection (e) of this section. The [Attorney General] 
        Secretary of Homeland Security is authorized to require 
        a carrier conducting operations under part 135 of title 
        14, Code of Federal Regulations, or a domestic 
        corporation conducting operations under part 91 of that 
        title, to give suitable and proper bond, in such 
        reasonable amount and containing such conditions as the 
        [Attorney General] Secretary of Homeland Security may 
        deem sufficient to ensure compliance with the 
        indemnification requirements of this section, as a term 
        of such an agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
        (8) Round-trip ticket

            The alien is in possession of a round-trip 
        transportation ticket (unless this requirement is 
        waived by the [Attorney General] Secretary of Homeland 
        Security under regulations or the alien is arriving at 
        the port of entry on an aircraft operated under part 
        135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, or a 
        noncommercial aircraft that is owned or operated by a 
        domestic corporation conducting operations under part 
        91 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations).

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

        (10) Electronic transmission of identification 
        information

            Operators of aircraft under part 135 of title 14, 
        Code of Federal Regulations, or operators of 
        noncommercial aircraft that are owned or operated by a 
        domestic corporation conducting operations under part 
        91 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, carrying 
        any alien passenger who will apply for admission under 
        this section shall furnish such information as the 
        [Attorney General] Secretary of Homeland Security by 
        regulation shall prescribe as necessary for the 
        identification of any alien passenger being transported 
        and for the enforcement of the immigration laws. Such 
        information shall be electronically transmitted not 
        less than one hour prior to arrival at the port of 
        entry for purposes of checking for inadmissibility 
        using the automated electronic database.

(c) Designation of program countries

        [(1) In general

            [The [Attorney General] Secretary of Homeland 
        Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, 
        may designate any country as a program country if it 
        meets the requirements of paragraph (2).]
            (1) Authority to designate; definitions.--
                    (A) Authority to designate.--The Secretary 
                of Homeland Security, in consultation with the 
                Secretary of State, may designate any country 
                as a program country if that country meets the 
                requirements under paragraph (2).
                    (B) Definitions.--In this subsection:
                            (i) Appropriate congressional 
                        committees.--The term ``appropriate 
                        congressional committees'' means--
                                    (I) the Committee on 
                                Appropriations, the Committee 
                                on Foreign Relations, the 
                                Committee on Homeland Security 
                                and Governmental Affairs, and 
                                the Committee on the Judiciary 
                                of the Senate; and
                                    (II) the Committee on 
                                Appropriations, the Committee 
                                on Foreign Affairs, the 
                                Committee on Homeland Security, 
                                and the Committee on the 
                                Judiciary of the House of 
                                Representatives.
                            (ii) Overstay rate.--
                                    (I) Initial designation.--
                                The term ``overstay rate'' 
                                means, with respect to a 
                                country being considered for 
                                designation in the program, the 
                                ratio of--
                                            (aa) the number of 
                                        nationals of that 
                                        country who were 
                                        admitted to the United 
                                        States on the basis of 
                                        a nonimmigrant visa 
                                        under section 
                                        101(a)(15)(B) whose 
                                        periods of authorized 
                                        stay ended during a 
                                        fiscal year but who 
                                        remained unlawfully in 
                                        the United States 
                                        beyond such periods; to
                                            (bb) the number of 
                                        nationals of that 
                                        country who were 
                                        admitted to the United 
                                        States on the basis of 
                                        a nonimmigrant visa 
                                        under section 
                                        101(a)(15)(B) whose 
                                        periods of authorized 
                                        stay ended during that 
                                        fiscal year.
                                    (II) Continuing 
                                designation.--The term 
                                ``overstay rate'' means, for 
                                each fiscal year after initial 
                                designation under this section 
                                with respect to a country, the 
                                ratio of--
                                            (aa) the number of 
                                        nationals of that 
                                        country who were 
                                        admitted to the United 
                                        States under this 
                                        section or on the basis 
                                        of a nonimmigrant visa 
                                        under section 
                                        101(a)(15)(B) whose 
                                        periods of authorized 
                                        stay ended during a 
                                        fiscal year but who 
                                        remained unlawfully in 
                                        the United States 
                                        beyond such periods; to
                                            (bb) the number of 
                                        nationals of that 
                                        country who were 
                                        admitted to the United 
                                        States under this 
                                        section or on the basis 
                                        of a nonimmigrant visa 
                                        under section 
                                        101(a)(15)(B) whose 
                                        periods of authorized 
                                        stay ended during that 
                                        fiscal year.
                                    (III) Computation of 
                                overstay rate.--In determining 
                                the over stay rate for a 
                                country, the Secretary of 
                                Homeland Security may utilize 
                                information from any available 
                                databases to ensure the 
                                accuracy of such rate.
                            (iii) Program country.--The term 
                        ``program country'' means a country 
                        designated as a program country under 
                        subparagraph (A).

        [(2) Qualifications

            [Except as provided in subsection (f) of this 
        section, a country may not be designated as a program 
        country unless the following requirements are met:

                [(A) Low nonimmigrant visa refusal rate

                    [Either--

                            [(i) the average number of refusals 
                        of nonimmigrant visitor visas for 
                        nationals of that country during--
                                    [(I) the two previous full 
                                fiscal years was less than 2.0 
                                percent of the total number of 
                                nonimmigrant visitor visas for 
                                nationals of that country which 
                                were granted or refused during 
                                those years; and
                                    [(II) either of such two 
                                previous full fiscal years was 
                                less than 2.5 percent of the 
                                total number of nonimmigrant 
                                visitor visas for nationals of 
                                that country which were granted 
                                or refused during that year;
                            [(ii) such refusal rate for 
                        nationals of that country during the 
                        previous full fiscal year was less than 
                        3.0 percent.]
                    (A) General numerical limitations.--
                            (i) Low nonimmigrant visa refusal 
                        rate.--The percentage of nationals of 
                        that country refused nonimmigrant visas 
                        under section 101(a)(15)(B) during the 
                        previous full fiscal year was not more 
                        than 3 percent of the total number of 
                        nationals of that country who were 
                        granted or refused nonimmigrant visas 
                        under such section during such year.
                            (ii) Low nonimmigrant overstay 
                        rate.--The overstay rate for that 
                        country was not more than 3 percent 
                        during the previous fiscal year.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                [(C) Law enforcement and security interests

                    [The [Attorney General] Secretary of 
                Homeland Security, in consultation with the 
                Secretary of State--
                            [(i) evaluates the effect that the 
                        country's designation would have on the 
                        law enforcement and security interests 
                        of the United States (including the 
                        interest in enforcement of the 
                        immigration laws of the United States 
                        and the existence and effectiveness of 
                        its agreements and procedures for 
                        extraditing to the United States 
                        individuals, including its own 
                        nationals, who commit crimes that 
                        violate United States law);
                            [(ii) determines that such 
                        interests would not be compromised by 
                        the designation of the country; and
                            [(iii) submits a written report to 
                        the [Committee on the Judiciary and the 
                        Committee on International Relations of 
                        the House of Representatives and the 
                        Committee on the Judiciary and the 
                        Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
                        Senate] appropriate congressional 
                        committees regarding the country's 
                        qualification for designation that 
                        includes an explanation of such 
                        determination.]

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

        [(3) Continuing and subsequent qualifications

            [For each fiscal year after the initial period--

                [(A) Continuing qualification

                    [In the case of a country which was a 
                program country in the previous fiscal year, a 
                country may not be designated as a 
                programcountry unless the sum of--
                            [(i) the total of the number of 
                        nationals of that country who were 
                        denied admission at the time of arrival 
                        or withdrew their application for 
                        admission during such previous fiscal 
                        year as a nonimmigrant visitor, and
                            [(ii) the total number of nationals 
                        of that country who were admitted as 
                        nonimmigrant visitors during such 
                        previous fiscal year and who violated 
                        the terms of such admission, was less 
                        than 2 percent of the total number of 
                        nationals of that country who applied 
                        for admission as nonimmigrant visitors 
                        during such previous fiscal year.

                [(B) New countries

                    [In the case of another country, the 
                country may not be designated as a program 
                country unless the following requirements are 
                met:

                        [(i) Low nonimmigrant visa refusal rate 
                        in previous 2-year period

                            [The average number of refusals of 
                        nonimmigrant visitor visas for 
                        nationals of that country during the 
                        two previous full fiscal years was less 
                        than 2 percent of the total number of 
                        nonimmigrant visitor visas for 
                        nationals of that country which were 
                        granted or refused during those years.
                            [(ii) Low nonimmigrant visa refusal 
                        rate in each of the 2 previous years 
                        The average number of refusals of 
                        nonimmigrant visitor visas for 
                        nationals of that country during either 
                        of such two previous full fiscal years 
                        was less than 2.5 percent of the total 
                        number of nonimmigrant visitor visas 
                        for nationals of that country which 
                        were granted or refused during that 
                        year.]
            (3) Qualification criteria.--After the initial 
        period, a country may not be designated as a program 
        country unless the Secretary of Homeland Security, in 
        consultation with the Secretary of State, determines, 
        pursuant to the requirements under paragraph (5), that 
        the designation will be continued.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

        (5) Written reports on continuing qualification; 
        designation terminations

                (A) Periodic evaluations

                        (i) In general

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                                    (I) * * *
                                    [(II) shall determine, 
                                based upon the evaluation in 
                                subclause (I), whether any such 
                                designation ought to be 
                                continued or terminated under 
                                subsection (d) of this 
                                section;]
                                    (II) shall determine, based 
                                upon the evaluation in 
                                subclause (I), whether any such 
                                designation under subsection 
                                (d) or (f), or probation under 
                                subsection (f), ought to be 
                                continued or terminated;
                                    (III) shall submit a 
                                written report to the 
                                [Committee on the Judiciary, 
                                the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs, and the Committee on 
                                Homeland Security, of the House 
                                of Representatives and the 
                                Committee on the Judiciary, the 
                                Committee on Foreign Relations, 
                                and the Committee on Homeland 
                                Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs of the Senate] 
                                appropriate congressional 
                                committees regarding the 
                                continuation or termination of 
                                the country's designation that 
                                includes an explanation of such 
                                determination andthe effects 
                                described in subclause (I); and

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

        [(6) Computation of visa refusal rates

            [For purposes of determining the eligibility of a 
        country to be designated as a program country, the 
        calculation of visa refusal ratesshall not include any 
        visa refusals which incorporate any procedures based 
        on, or are otherwise based on, race, sex, or 
        disability, unlessotherwise specifically authorized by 
        law or regulation. No court shall have jurisdiction 
        under this paragraph to review any visa refusal,the 
        denial of admission to the United States of any alien 
        by the [Attorney General] Secretary of Homeland 
        Security, the Secretary's computation of the visa 
        refusal rate, or the designation or nondesignation of 
        any country.]
            (6) Computation of visa refusal rates and judicial 
        review.--
                    (A) Computation of visa refusal rates.--For 
                purposes of determining the eligibility of a 
                country to be designated as a program country, 
                the calculation of visa refusal rates shall not 
                include any visa refusals which incorporate any 
                procedures based on, or are otherwise based on, 
                race, sex, or disability, unless otherwise 
                specifically authorized by law or regulation.
                    (B) Judicial review.--No court shall have 
                jurisdiction under this section to review any 
                visa refusal, the Secretary of State's 
                computation of a visa refusal rate, the 
                Secretary of Homeland Security's computation of 
                an overstay rate, or the designation or 
                nondesignation of a country as a program 
                country.

        (7) Visa [waiver information] waiver information.--In 
        refusing

                [(A) In general]

                    [In refusing] the application of nationals 
                of a program country for United States visas, 
                or the applications of nationals of a 
                countryseeking entry into the visa waiver 
                program, a consular officer shall not knowingly 
                or intentionally classify the refusal of the 
                visa under a category that is not included in 
                the calculation of the visa refusal rate only 
                so that the percentage of that country's visa 
                refusals is less than the percentage limitation 
                applicable to qualification for participation 
                in the visa waiver program.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                [(D) Consideration of countries in the visa 
                waiver program

                    [Upon notification to the [Attorney 
                General] Secretary of Homeland Security that a 
                country is under consideration for inclusion in 
                the visa waiver program, the Secretary of State 
                shall provide all of the information described 
                in subparagraph (B) to the [Attorney General] 
                Secretary of Homeland Security.

                [(E) Definition

                    [In this paragraph, the term ``appropriate 
                congressional committees'' means the Committee 
                on the Judiciary and the Committee on Foreign 
                Relations of the Senate and the Committee on 
                the Judiciary and the Committee on 
                International Relations of the House of 
                Representatives.]

        [(8) Nonimmigrant visa refusal rate flexibility

                [(A) Certification

                        [(i) In general

                            [On the date on which an air exit 
                        system is in place that can verify the 
                        departure of not less than 97 percent 
                        of foreign nationalswho exit through 
                        airports of the United States and the 
                        electronic travel authorization system 
                        required under subsection (h)(3) is 
                        fully operational, the Secretary of 
                        Homeland Security shall certify to 
                        Congress that such air exit system and 
                        electronic travel authorization system 
                        are in place.

                        [(ii) Notification to Congress

                            [The Secretary shall notify 
                        Congress in writing of the date on 
                        which the air exit system under clause 
                        (i) fully satisfies the biometric 
                        requirements specified in subsection 
                        (i).

                        [(iii) Temporary suspension of waiver 
                        authority

                            [Notwithstanding any certification 
                        made under clause (i), if the Secretary 
                        has not notified Congress in accordance 
                        with clause (ii) by June 30, 2009, the 
                        Secretary's waiver authority under 
                        subparagraph (B) shall be suspended 
                        beginning on July 1, 2009, until such 
                        time as the Secretary makes such 
                        notification.

                        [(iv) Rule of construction

                            [Nothing in this paragraph shall be 
                        construed as in any way abrogating the 
                        reporting requirements under subsection 
                        (i)(3).

                [(B) Waiver

                    [After certification by the Secretary under 
                subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in 
                consultation with the Secretary of State, may 
                waive the application of paragraph (2)(A) for a 
                country if--
                            [(i) the country meets all security 
                        requirements of this section; (ii) the 
                        Secretary of Homeland Security 
                        determines that the totality of the 
                        country's security risk mitigation 
                        measures provide assurance that the 
                        country's participation in the program 
                        would not compromise the law 
                        enforcement, security interests, or 
                        enforcement of the immigration laws of 
                        the United States;
                            [(ii) the Secretary of Homeland 
                        Security determines that the totality 
                        of the country's security risk 
                        mitigation measures provide assurance 
                        that the country's participation in the 
                        program would not compromise the law 
                        enforcement, security interests, or 
                        enforcement of the immigration laws of 
                        the United States;
                            [(iii) there has been a sustained 
                        reduction in the rate of refusals for 
                        nonimmigrant visas for nationals of the 
                        country and conditionsexist to continue 
                        such reduction;
                            [(iv) the country cooperated with 
                        the Government of the United States on 
                        counterterrorism initiatives, 
                        information sharing, and preventing 
                        terrorist travel before the date of its 
                        designation as a program country, and 
                        the Secretary of Homeland Security and 
                        the Secretary of State determine that 
                        such cooperation will continue;and
                            [(v)(I) the rate of refusals for 
                        nonimmigrant visitor visas for 
                        nationals of the country during the 
                        previous full fiscal year was not more 
                        than ten percent; or
                            [(II) the visa overstay rate for 
                        the country for the previous full 
                        fiscal year does not exceed the maximum 
                        visa overstay rate, once such rate is 
                        established under subparagraph (C).

                [(C) Maximum visa overstay rate

                        [(i) Requirement to establish

                            [After certification by the 
                        Secretary under subparagraph (A), the 
                        Secretary and the Secretary of State 
                        jointly shall use informationfrom the 
                        air exit system referred to in such 
                        subparagraph to establisha maximum visa 
                        overstay rate for countries 
                        participating in the program pursuant 
                        to a waiver under subparagraph (B). The 
                        Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
                        certify to Congress that such rate 
                        wouldnot compromise the law 
                        enforcement, security interests, or 
                        enforcement of the immigration laws of 
                        the United States.

                        [(ii) Visa overstay rate defined In 
                        this paragraph the term ``visa overstay 
                        rate'' means, with respect to a 
                        country, the ratio of--
                                [(I) the total number of 
                                nationals of that country who 
                                were admitted to the United 
                                States on the basis of a 
                                nonimmigrant visa whose periods 
                                of authorized stays ended 
                                during a fiscal year but who 
                                remained unlawfully in the 
                                United States beyond such 
                                periods; to
                                [(II) the total number of 
                                nationals of that country who 
                                were admitted to the United 
                                States on the basis of a 
                                nonimmigrant visa during that 
                                fiscal year.

                        [(iii) Report and publication

                            [The Secretary of Homeland Security 
                        shall on the same date submit to 
                        Congress and publish in the Federal 
                        Register information relating to the 
                        maximum visa overstay rate established 
                        under clause (i). Not later than 60 
                        days after such date, the Secretary 
                        shall issue a final maximum visa 
                        overstay rate above which a country may 
                        not participate in the program.]
                    (8) Waiver authority.--The Secretary of 
                Homeland Security, in consultation with the 
                Secretary of State, may waive the application 
                of paragraph (2)(A)(i) for a country if--
                    (A) the country meets all other 
                requirements of paragraph (2);
                    (B) the Secretary of Homeland Security 
                determines that the totality of the country's 
                security risk mitigation measures provide 
                assurance that the country's participation in 
                the program would not compromise the law 
                enforcement, security interests, or enforcement 
                of the immigration laws of the United States;
                    (C) there has been a general downward trend 
                in the percentage of nationals of the country 
                refused nonimmigrant visas under section 
                101(a)(15)(B);
                    (D) the country consistently cooperated 
                with the Government of the United States on 
                counterterrorism initiatives, information 
                sharing, preventing terrorist travel, and 
                extradition of the country's nationals to the 
                United States before the date of its 
                designation as a program country, and the 
                Secretary of Homeland Security and the 
                Secretary of State assess that such cooperation 
                is likely to continue;
                    (E) the percentage of nationals of the 
                country refused a nonimmigrant visa under 
                section 101(a)(15)(B) during the previous full 
                fiscal year was not more than 10 percent of the 
                total number of nationals of that country who 
                were granted or refused such nonimmigrant 
                visas; and
                    (F) Effective period.--The amendments made 
                by this subsection shall be in effect during 
                the period beginning of the date of enactment 
                of this Act and ending on September 30, 2015.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

(e) Carrier agreements

        (1) In general

            The agreement referred to in subsection (a)(4) of 
        this section is an agreement between a carrier 
        (including any carrier conducting operations under part 
        135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations) or a 
        domestic corporation conducting operations under part 
        91 of that title and the [Attorney General] Secretary 
        of Homeland Security under which the carrier (including 
        any carrier conducting operations under part 135 of 
        title 14, Code of Federal Regulations) or a domestic 
        corporation conducting operations under part 91 of that 
        title agrees, in consideration of the waiver of the 
        visa requirement with respect to a nonimmigrant visitor 
        under the program--
                (A) * * *

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                (C) to be subject to the imposition of fines 
                resulting from the transporting into the United 
                States of a national of a designatedcountry 
                without a passport pursuant to regulations 
                promulgated by the [Attorney General] Secretary 
                of Homeland Security, and

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

        (2) Termination of agreements

            The [Attorney General] Secretary of Homeland 
        Security may terminate an agreement under paragraph (1) 
        with five days' notice to the carrier (including any 
        carrier conducting operations under part 135 of title 
        14, Code of Federal Regulations) or a domestic 
        corporation conducting operations under part 91 of that 
        title for the failure by a carrier (including any 
        carrier conducting operations under part 135 of title 
        14, Code of Federal Regulations) or a domestic 
        corporation conducting operations under part 91 of that 
        title to meet the terms of such agreement.

        (3) Business aircraft requirements

                (A) In general

                    For purposes of this section, a domestic 
                corporation conducting operations under part 91 
                of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations\2\ 
                that owns or operates a noncommercial aircraft 
                is a corporation that is organized under the 
                laws of any of the States of the United States 
                or the District of Columbia and is accredited 
                by or a member of a national organization that 
                sets business aviation standards. The Attorney 
                General shall prescribe by regulation the 
                provision of such information as the [Attorney 
                General] Secretary of Homeland Security deems 
                necessary to identify the domestic corporation, 
                its officers, employees, shareholders, its 
                place of business, and its business activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \2\So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (B) Collections

                    In addition to any other fee authorized by 
                law, the [Attorney General] Secretary of 
                Homeland Security is authorized to charge and 
                collect, on a periodic basis, an amount from 
                each domestic corporation conducting operations 
                under part 91 of title 14, Code of Federal 
                Regulations, for nonimmigrant visa waiver 
                admissions on noncommercial aircraft owned or 
                operated by such domestic corporation equal to 
                the total amount of fees assessed for issuance 
                of nonimmigrant visa waiver arrival/departure 
                forms at land border ports of entry. All fees 
                collected under this paragraph shall be 
                deposited into the Immigration User Fee Account 
                established under section 1356(h) of this 
                title.
[(f) Duration and termination of designation

        [(1) In general

                [(A) Determination and notification of 
                disqualification rate

                    [Upon determination by the [Attorney 
                General] Secretary of Homeland Security that a 
                program country's disqualification rate is 2 
                percent or more, the Attorney General shall 
                notify the Secretary of State.

                [(B) Probationary status

                    [If the program country's disqualification 
                rate is greater than 2 percent but less than 
                3.5 percent, the [Attorney General] Secretary 
                of Homeland Security shall place the program 
                country in probationary status for a period not 
                to exceed 2 full fiscal yearsfollowing the year 
                in which the determination under subparagraph 
                (A) is made.

                [(C) Termination of designation

                    [Subject to paragraph (3), if the program 
                country's disqualification rate is 3.5 percent 
                or more, the [Attorney General] Secretary of 
                Homeland Security shall terminate the country's 
                designation as a program country effective at 
                the beginning of the second fiscal year 
                following the fiscal year in which the 
                determination under subparagraph (A) is made.

        [(2) Termination of probationary status

                [(A) In general

                    If the [Attorney General] Secretary of 
                Homeland Security determines at the end of the 
                probationary period described in paragraph 
                (1)(B) that the program country placed in 
                probationary status under such paragraph has 
                failed to develop a machine-readable passport 
                program as required by section\3\ (c)(2)(C) of 
                this section, or has a disqualification rate of 
                2 percent or more, the [Attorney General] 
                Secretary of Homeland Security shall terminate 
                the designation of the country as a program 
                country. If the [Attorney General] Secretary of 
                Homeland Security determines that the program 
                country has developed a machine-readable 
                passport program and has a disqualification 
                rate of less than 2 percent, the [Attorney 
                General] Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
                redesignate the country as a program country.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \3\So in original. Probably should be ``subsection''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (f) Termination of Designation; Probation.--
            (1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
                    (A) Probationary period.--The term 
                ``probationary period'' means the fiscal year 
                in which a probationary country is placed in 
                probationary status under this subsection.
                    (B) Program country.--The term ``program 
                country'' has the meaning given that term in 
                subsection (c)(1)(B).
            (2) Determination, notice, and initial probationary 
        period.--
                    (A) Determination of probationary status 
                and notice of noncompliance.--As part of each 
                program country's periodic evaluation required 
                by subsection (c)(5)(A), the Secretary of 
                Homeland Security shall determine whether a 
                program country is in compliance with the 
                program requirements under subparagraphs 
                (A)(ii) through (F) of subsection (c)(2).
                    (B) Initial probationary period.--If the 
                Secretary of Homeland Security determines that 
                a program country visa is not in compliance 
                with the program requirements under 
                subparagraphs (A)(ii) through (F) of subsection 
                (c)(2), the Secretary of Homeland Security 
                shall place the program country in probationary 
                status for the fiscal year following the fiscal 
                year in which the periodic evaluation is 
                completed.
            (3) Actions at the end of the initial probationary 
        period.--At the end of the initial probationary period 
        of a country under paragraph (2)(B), the Secretary of 
        Homeland Security shall take one of the following 
        actions:
                    (A) Compliance during initial probationary 
                period.--If the Secretary determines that all 
                instances of noncompliance with the program 
                requirements under subparagraphs (A)(ii) 
                through (F) of subsection (c)(2) that were 
                identified in the latest periodic evaluation 
                have been remedied by the end of the initial 
                probationary period, the Secretary shall end 
                the country's probationary period.
                    (B) Noncompliance during initial 
                probationary period.--If the Secretary 
                determines that any instance of noncompliance 
                with the program requirements under 
                subparagraphs (A)(ii) through (F) of subsection 
                (c)(2) that were identified in the latest 
                periodic evaluation has not been remedied by 
                the end of the initial probationary period--
                            (i) the Secretary may terminate the 
                        country's participation in the program; 
                        or
                            (ii) on an annual basis, the 
                        Secretary may continue the country's 
                        probationary status if the Secretary, 
                        in consultation with the Secretary of 
                        State, determines that the country's 
                        continued participation in the program 
                        is in the national interest of the 
                        United States.
            (4) Actions at the end of additional probationary 
        periods.--At the end of all probationary periods 
        granted to a country pursuant to paragraph (3)(B)(ii), 
        the Secretary shall take 1 of the following actions:
                    (A) Compliance during additional period.--
                The Secretary shall end the country's 
                probationary status if the Secretary determines 
                during the latest periodic evaluation required 
                by subsection (c)(5)(A) that the country is in 
                compliance with the program requirements under 
                subparagraphs (A)(ii) through (F) of subsection 
                (c)(2).
                    (B) Noncompliance during additional 
                periods.--The Secretary shall terminate the 
                country's participation in the program if the 
                Secretary determines during the latest periodic 
                evaluation required by subsection (c)(5)(A) 
                that the program country continues to be in 
                noncompliance with the program requirements 
                under subparagraphs (A)(ii) through (F) of 
                subsection (c)(2).
            (5) Effective date.--The termination of a country's 
        participation in the program under paragraph (3)(B) or 
        (4)(B) shall take effect on the first day of the first 
        fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the 
        Secretary determines that such participation shall be 
        terminated. Until such date, nationals of the country 
        shall remain eligible for a waiver under subsection 
        (a).
            (6) Treatment of nationals after termination.--For 
        purposes of this subsection and subsection (d)--
                    (A) nationals of a country whose 
                designation is terminated under paragraph (3) 
                or (4) shall remain eligible for a waiver under 
                subsection (a) until the effective date of such 
                termination; and
                    (B) a waiver under this section that is 
                provided to such a national for a period 
                described in subsection (a)(1) shall not, by 
                such termination, be deemed to have been 
                rescinded or otherwise rendered invalid, if the 
                waiver is granted prior to such termination.
            (7) Consultative role of the secretary of state.--
        In this subsection, references to subparagraphs (A)(ii) 
        through (F) of subsection (c)(2) and subsection 
        (c)(5)(A) carry with them the consultative role of the 
        Secretary of State as provided in those provisions.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

(h) Use of information technology systems

        (1) Automated entry-exit control system

                (A) System

                    Not later than October 1, 2001, the 
                [Attorney General] Secretary of Homeland 
                Security shall develop and implement a fully 
                automated entry and exit control system that 
                will collect a record of arrival and departure 
                for every alien who arrives and departs by sea 
                or air at a port of entry into the United 
                States and is provided a waiver under the 
                program.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                        (i) Data collection by carriers

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                        (ii) Data provision by carriers

                            Not later than October 1, 2002, no 
                        waiver may be provided under this 
                        section to an alien arriving by sea or 
                        air at a port ofentry into the United 
                        States on a carrier unless the carrier 
                        is electronically transmitting to the 
                        automated entry and exit control system 
                        passenger data determined by the 
                        [Attorney General] Secretary of 
                        Homeland Security to be sufficient to 
                        permit the [Attorney General] Secretary 
                        of Homeland Security to carry out this 
                        paragraph.

                        (iii) Calculation

                            The system shall contain sufficient 
                        data to permit the [Attorney General] 
                        Secretary of Homeland Security to 
                        calculate, for each program country and 
                        each fiscal year, the portion of 
                        nationals of that country who are 
                        described in subparagraph (A) and for 
                        whom no record of departure exists, 
                        expressed as a percentage of the total 
                        number of such nationals who are so 
                        described.

                (C) Reporting

                        (i) Percentage of nationals lacking 
                        departure record

                            As part of the annual report 
                        required to be submitted under section 
                        1365a(e)(1) of this title, the 
                        [Attorney General] Secretary of 
                        Homeland Security shall include a 
                        section containing the calculation 
                        described in subparagraph (B)(iii) for 
                        each program country for the previous 
                        fiscal year, together with an analysis 
                        of that information.

                        (ii) System effectiveness

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                                    (I) The conclusions of the 
                                [Attorney General] Secretary of 
                                Homeland Security regarding the 
                                effectiveness of the automated 
                                entry and exit control system 
                                to be developed and implemented 
                                under this paragraph.
                                    (II) The recommendations of 
                                the [Attorney General] 
                                Secretary of Homeland Security 
                                regarding the use of the 
                                calculation described in 
                                subparagraph (B)(iii) as a 
                                basis for evaluating whether to 
                                terminate or continue the 
                                designation of a country as a 
                                program country.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

        (2) Automated data sharing system

                (A) System

                    The [Attorney General] Secretary of 
                Homeland Security and the Secretary of State 
                shall develop and implement an automated data 
                sharing system that will permit them to share 
                data in electronic form from their respective 
                records systems regarding the admissibility of 
                aliens who are nationals of a program country.

                (B) Requirements

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                        (i) * * *

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                        (ii) Supplying photographs of 
                        inadmissible aliens

                            The system shall permit the 
                        [Attorney General] Secretary of 
                        Homeland Security electronically to 
                        obtain any photograph contained in the 
                        records of the Secretary of State 
                        pertaining to an alien who is a 
                        national of a program country and has 
                        been determined to be ineligible to 
                        receive a visa.
                                ------                                

                TITLE 42--THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

                 Chapter 46--Justice System Improvement

   Subchapter VII--FBI Training of State and Local Criminal Justice 
                               Personnel

Sec. 3771. Training and manpower development

(a) Functions, powers, and duties of Director of Federal Bureau 
            of Investigation

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

  Employment of Annuitants by Federal Law Enforcement Training Center

    Pub. L. 107-206, title I, Sec. 1202, Aug. 2, 2002, 116 
Stat. 887, as amended by Pub. L. 109-295, title IV, Oct. 4, 
2006, 120 Stat. 1374; Pub. L. 110-161, div. E, title IV, Dec. 
26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2068; Pub. L. 110-329, div. D, title IV, 
Sept. 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 3677; Pub. L. 111-83, title IV, Oct. 
28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2166; Pub. L. 112-74, div. D, title IV, 
Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 966, provided that:
    (a) The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center may, for a 
period ending not later than [December 31, 2015] December 31, 
2016, appoint and maintain a cadre of up to 350 Federal 
annuitants: (1) without regard to any provision of title 5, 
United States Code, which might otherwise require the 
application of competitive hiring procedures; and (2) who shall 
not be subject to any reduction in pay (for annuity allocable 
to the period of actual employment) under the provisions of 
section 8344 or 8468 of such title 5 or similar provision of 
any other retirement system for employees. A reemployed Federal 
annuitant as to whom a waiver of reduction under paragraph (2) 
applies shall not, for any period during which such waiver is 
in effect, be considered an employee for purposes of subchapter 
III of chapter 83 or chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code, 
or such other retirement system (referred to in paragraph (2)) 
as may apply.
                                ------                                

DEPARTMENTS OF COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY, AND RELATED 
          AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2002, PUBLIC LAW 107-77

TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

               General Provisions--Department of Justice

    Sec. 101. * * *

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

    Sec. 109. Section 286 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1356), as amended, is further amended as follows:
            (1) by striking in subsection (d) ``$6'', and 
        inserting ``[$7] $9'';
                                ------                                

     CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION, 2003, PUBLIC LAW 108-7

 DIVISION B--COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY, AND RELATED 
                     AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS, 2003

TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

               General Provisions--Department of Justice

    Sec. 101. * * *

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

    Sec. 108. Section 286(e) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act is amended by striking paragraph (3) and replacing it with 
the following:
            ``(3) The Attorney General shall charge and collect 
        [$3] $5 per individual for the immigration inspection 
        or pre-inspection of each commercial vessel passenger 
        whose journey originated in the United States or in any 
        place set forth in paragraph (1): Provided, That this 
        requirement shall not apply to immigration inspection 
        at designated ports of entry of passengers arriving by 
        ferry, or by Great Lakes vessels on the Great Lakes and 
        connecting waterways when operating on a regular 
        schedule. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term 
        `ferry' means a vessel, in other than ocean or 
        coastwise service, having provisions only for deck 
        passengers and/or vehicles, operating on a short run on 
        a frequent schedule between two points over the most 
        direct water route, and offering a public service of a 
        type normally attributed to a bridge or tunnel.''.
                                ------                                

 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2007, PUBLIC LAW 
                                109-295

TITLE I

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                                TITLE V

                           GENERAL PROVISIONS

    Sec. 501. * * *

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

    Sec. 532. (a) United States Secret Service Use of Proceeds 
Derived From Criminal Investigations.--During fiscal year 
[2013] 2014 and thereafter, with respect to any undercover 
investigative operation of the United States Secret Service 
(hereafter referred to in this section as the ``Secret 
Service'') that is necessary for the detection and prosecution 
of crimes against the United States--
                                ------                                

 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2010, PUBLIC LAW 
                                 111-83

TITLE I

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

TITLE V

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                           GENERAL PROVISIONS

                    (INCLUDING RESCISSIONS OF FUNDS)

    Sec. 501. * * *

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

    Sec. 550. Section 550(b) of the Department of Homeland 
Security Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 109-295; 6 U.S.C. 
121 note) is amended by striking ``three years after the date 
of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``[on October 4, 2013] 
on October 4, 2014''.

                        BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL

  PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
                                                     AMENDED
                                            [In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Budget authority                Outlays
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                                              Committee    Amount  in    Committee    Amount  in
                                                             guidance\1\      bill        guidance       bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee guidance
 to its subcommittees of amounts in the Budget Resolution
 for 2014: Subcommittee on Homeland Security:
    Mandatory.............................................            NA        1,460            NA     \2\1,478
    Discretionary.........................................        39,100       44,953            NA    \2\46,148
        Security..........................................         1,626        1,853            NA           NA
        Nonsecurity.......................................        37,474       43,100            NA           NA
Projection of outlays associated with the recommendation:
    2014..................................................  ............  ............  ...........     \3\2,014
    2015..................................................  ............  ............  ...........        9,583
    2016..................................................  ............  ............  ...........        5,598
    2017..................................................  ............  ............  ...........        2,835
    2018 and future years.................................  ............  ............  ...........        2,182
Financial assistance to State and local governments for               NA        5,370            NA        6,528
 2014.....................................................

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There is no section 302(a) allocation to the Committee on Appropriations for fiscal year 2014.
\2\Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\3\Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.

NA: Not applicable.

NOTE.--Consistent with the funding recommended in the bill for disaster funding and overseas contingency
  operations and in accordance with subparagraphs (A)(ii) and (D) of section 251(b)(2) of the BBEDCA of 1985,
  the Committee anticipates that the Budget Committee will provide, at the appropriate time, 302(a) allocation
  for the Committee on Appropriations reflecting an upward adjustment of $5,853,000,000 in budget authority plus
  associated outlays.

  COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL
                                                                        YEAR 2014
                                                                [In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                       Senate Committee recommendation compared with  (+
                                                                                                                             or -)
               Item                      2013       Budget estimate  House allowance     Committee    --------------------------------------------------
                                    appropriation                                      recommendation        2013
                                                                                                        appropriation   Budget estimate  House allowance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

 TITLE I--DEPARTMENTAL MANAGEMENT
          AND OPERATIONS

     Departmental Operations

Office of the Secretary and
 Executive Management:
    Immediate Office of the                 4,280            4,128            3,492            4,100             -180              -28             +608
     Secretary...................
    Immediate Office of the                 2,091            1,822            1,536            1,800             -291              -22             +264
     Deputy Secretary............
    Office of the Chief of Staff.           2,172            2,200            1,084            2,100              -72             -100           +1,016
    Executive Secretary..........           7,582            7,603            3,740            7,500              -82             -103           +3,760
    Office of Policy.............          43,692           27,815           29,998           37,000           -6,692           +9,185           +7,002
    Office of Public Affairs.....           5,468            8,661            9,326            8,600           +3,132              -61             -726
    Office of Legislative Affairs           5,792            5,498            4,625            5,400             -392              -98             +775
    Office of Intergovernmental             2,377            2,518            2,120            2,300              -77             -218             +180
     Affairs.....................
    Office of General Counsel....          21,130           21,000           17,691           20,000           -1,130           -1,000           +2,309
    Office for Civil Rights and            21,611           21,678           18,272           21,500             -111             -178           +3,228
     Civil Liberties.............
    Citizenship and Immigration             5,643            5,344            4,501            5,300             -343              -44             +799
     Services Ombudsman..........
    Privacy Officer..............           7,989            8,143            6,861            8,000              +11             -143           +1,139
    Office of International        ...............           7,626   ...............  ...............  ...............          -7,626   ...............
     Affairs.....................
    Office of State and Local Law  ...............             852   ...............  ...............  ...............            -852   ...............
     Enforcement.................
    Private Sector Office........  ...............           1,666   ...............  ...............  ...............          -1,666   ...............
    Undistributed reduction......  ...............  ...............          -2,838   ...............  ...............  ...............          +2,838
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         129,827          126,554          100,408          123,600           -6,227           -2,954          +23,192

Office of the Under Secretary for
 Management:
    Immediate Office of the Under           3,096            2,735            2,305            2,700             -396              -35             +395
     Secretary for Management....
    Office of the Chief Security           68,909           66,025           55,799           65,000           -3,909           -1,025           +9,201
     Officer.....................
    Office of the Chief                    71,905           66,915           56,459           66,000           -5,905             -915           +9,541
     Procurement Officer.........
    Undistributed reductions.....  ...............  ...............         -38,343   ...............  ...............  ...............         +38,343
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         143,910          135,675           76,220          133,700          -10,210           -1,975          +57,480

    Office of the Chief Human
     Capital Officer:
        Salaries and expenses....          24,938           22,276           18,771           22,000           -2,938             -276           +3,229
        Human resources                     9,667            9,213            7,815            8,000           -1,667           -1,213             +185
         information technology..
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............          34,605           31,489           26,586           30,000           -4,605           -1,489           +3,414

    Office of the Chief
     Administrative Officer:
        Salaries and expenses....          34,267           30,793           26,004           30,000           -4,267             -793           +3,996
        Nebraska Avenue Complex             5,441            4,729            4,020            4,500             -941             -229             +480
         [NAC]...................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............          39,708           35,522           30,024           34,500           -5,208           -1,022           +4,476
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Office of the         218,223          202,686          132,830          198,200          -20,023           -4,486          +65,370
           Under Secretary for
           Management............

        St Elizabeths support      ...............          12,800   ...............  ...............  ...............         -12,800   ...............
         costs...................
        DHS Headquarters           ...............          92,700   ...............  ...............  ...............         -92,700   ...............
         consolidation project...
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, DHS Headquarters  ...............         105,500   ...............  ...............  ...............        -105,500   ...............
           Consolidation Project.

Office of the Chief Financial              51,432           48,779           41,242           48,000           -3,432             -779           +6,758
 Officer.........................
    Undistributed reduction......  ...............  ...............         -10,000   ...............  ...............  ...............         +10,000

Office of the Chief Information
 Officer:
    Salaries and expenses........         117,844          117,347           99,397          115,000           -2,844           -2,347          +15,603
    Information technology                 27,564           32,712           25,612           31,000           +3,436           -1,712           +5,388
     services....................
    Infrastructure and security            55,926          100,063           45,863           45,000          -10,926          -55,063             -863
     activities..................
    Homeland secure data network.          42,076           77,132           39,863           72,000          +29,924           -5,132          +32,137
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         243,410          327,254          210,735          263,000          +19,590          -64,254          +52,265

Analysis and Operations..........         321,855          309,228          291,623          303,708          -18,147           -5,520          +12,085
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Departmental                 964,747        1,120,001          766,838          936,508          -28,239         -183,493         +169,670
       Operations................
                                  ======================================================================================================================
Office of Inspector General:
    Operating expenses...........         121,004          119,309          113,903          117,371           -3,633           -1,938           +3,468
    (By transfer from Disaster            (24,000)         (24,000)         (24,000)         (24,000)  ...............  ...............  ...............
     Relief).....................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Office of Inspector          145,004          143,309          137,903          141,371           -3,633           -1,938           +3,468
       General...................
                                  ======================================================================================================================
      Total, title I,                   1,085,751        1,239,310          880,741        1,053,879          -31,872         -185,431         +173,138
       Departmental Management
       and Operations............
      (By transfer)..............         (24,000)         (24,000)         (24,000)         (24,000)  ...............  ...............  ...............
                                  ======================================================================================================================
 TITLE II--SECURITY, ENFORCEMENT,
        AND INVESTIGATIONS

     U.S. Customs and Border
            Protection

Salaries and Expenses:
    Headquarters, Management, and
     Administration:
        Commissioner.............          17,392   ...............          25,288           25,171           +7,779          +25,171             -117
        Chief Counsel............          43,021   ...............          45,022           44,726           +1,705          +44,726             -296
        Congressional Affairs....           2,565   ...............           2,482            2,466              -99           +2,466              -16
        Internal Affairs.........         153,905   ...............         162,568          149,061           -4,844         +149,061          -13,507
        Public Affairs...........          12,546   ...............          12,920           12,830             +284          +12,830              -90
        Training and development.          77,618   ...............          76,512           76,082           -1,536          +76,082             -430
        Tech, innovation,                  25,970   ...............          22,972           22,788           -3,182          +22,788             -184
         acquisition.............
        Intelligence/                      68,066   ...............          61,105           60,747           -7,319          +60,747             -358
         Investigative Liaison...
        Administration...........         414,127   ...............         293,091          413,473             -654         +413,473         +120,382
        Rent.....................         564,126          407,898          407,898          396,398         -167,728          -11,500          -11,500
        Management and             ...............         620,656   ...............  ...............  ...............        -620,656   ...............
         administration, border
         security inspections and
         trade facilitation......
        Management and             ...............         592,330   ...............  ...............  ...............        -592,330   ...............
         administration, border
         security and control
         between ports of entry..
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Subtotal.............       1,379,336        1,620,884        1,109,858        1,203,742         -175,594         -417,142          +93,884

    Border Security Inspections
     and Trade Facilitation:
        Inspections, trade, and         2,715,066        2,727,294        2,887,718        2,687,853          -27,213          -39,441         -199,865
         travel facilitation at
         ports of entry..........
        Harbor maintenance fee              3,270            3,274            3,274            3,274               +4   ...............  ...............
         collection (trust fund).
        International cargo                71,393           72,260           71,961           67,461           -3,932           -4,799           -4,500
         screening...............
        Other international                24,766           24,740           24,596           24,596             -170             -144   ...............
         programs................
        Customs-Trade Partnership          43,012           40,183           41,960           38,460           -4,552           -1,723           -3,500
         Against Terrorism [C-
         TPAT]...................
        Trusted Traveler programs          10,797            6,311            6,311            5,311           -5,486           -1,000           -1,000
        Inspection and detection          117,410          112,526          112,504          111,504           -5,906           -1,022           -1,000
         technology investments..
        Automated Targeting               113,676          109,944          132,932   ...............        -113,676         -109,944         -132,932
         Systems.................
        National Targeting Center          68,037           65,474           65,106           65,106           -2,931             -368   ...............
        Training.................          34,800           47,651           40,703           39,441           +4,641           -8,210           -1,262
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............       3,202,227        3,209,657        3,387,065        3,043,006         -159,221         -166,651         -344,059

    Border Security and Control
     Between Ports of Entry:
        Border security and             3,627,003        3,700,317        3,723,502        3,673,836          +46,833          -26,481          -49,666
         control.................
        Training.................          73,841           55,928           55,558           55,558          -18,283             -370   ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............       3,700,844        3,756,245        3,779,060        3,729,394          +28,550          -26,851          -49,666

    Air and Marine Operations....  ...............         286,769   ...............  ...............  ...............        -286,769   ...............
    US-VISIT.....................  ...............         253,533   ...............  ...............  ...............        -253,533   ...............
Emergency appropriations (Public            1,667   ...............  ...............  ...............          -1,667   ...............  ...............
 Law 113-2)......................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Salaries and               8,284,074        9,127,088        8,275,983        7,976,142         -307,932       -1,150,946         -299,841
       expenses..................
          Appropriations.........      (8,279,137)      (9,123,814)      (8,272,709)      (7,972,868)       (-306,269)     (-1,150,946)       (-299,841)
          Harbor maintenance               (3,270)          (3,274)          (3,274)          (3,274)             (+4)  ...............  ...............
           trust fund............
          Emergency                        (1,667)  ...............  ...............  ...............         (-1,667)  ...............  ...............
           appropriations........
                                  ======================================================================================================================
Small airport user fee...........  ...............           5,000            5,000            5,000           +5,000   ...............  ...............

Automation Modernization:
    Information Technology.......         393,820   ...............         367,860          349,450          -44,370         +349,450          -18,410
    Automated targeting systems..  ...............  ...............  ...............         109,932         +109,932         +109,932         +109,932
    Automated Commercial                  138,611          140,830          140,762          140,762           +2,151              -68   ...............
     Environment/International
     Trade Data System [ITDS]....
    Current operations protection         186,486          199,275          199,275          200,174          +13,688             +899             +899
     and processing support
     [COPPS].....................
    Undistributed reduction......  ...............  ...............          -7,655   ...............  ...............  ...............          +7,655
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         718,917          340,105          700,242          800,318          +81,401         +460,213         +100,076

Border Security Fencing,
 Infrastructure, and Technology
 [BSFIT]:
    Development and deployment...         188,567          160,435          160,435          160,435          -28,132   ...............  ...............
    Operations and maintenance...         135,104          191,019          191,019          191,019          +55,915   ...............  ...............
    Undistributed increase.......  ...............  ...............          10,000   ...............  ...............  ...............         -10,000
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         323,671          351,454          361,454          351,454          +27,783   ...............         -10,000

Air and Marine Operations:
    Salaries and expenses........         283,196   ...............         292,791          283,318             +122         +283,318           -9,473
    Operations and maintenance...         396,875          353,751          392,000          381,251          -15,624          +27,500          -10,749
    Procurement..................         117,881           73,950          117,950           91,250          -26,631          +17,300          -26,700
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         797,952          427,701          802,741          755,819          -42,133         +328,118          -46,922

Construction and Facilities
 Management:
    Facilities construction and           175,981          385,398          385,398          385,398         +209,417   ...............  ...............
     sustainment.................
    Program oversight and                  57,273           86,101           85,880           85,880          +28,607             -221   ...............
     management..................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         233,254          471,499          471,278          471,278         +238,024             -221   ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, U.S. Customs and          10,357,868       10,722,847       10,616,698       10,360,011           +2,143         -362,836         -256,687
       Border Protection direct
       appropriations............
                                  ======================================================================================================================
Fee Accounts:
    Immigration inspection user          (568,790)        (764,267)        (764,267)        (764,267)       (+195,477)  ...............  ...............
     fee.........................
    Immigration enforcement fines          (1,093)            (773)            (773)            (773)           (-320)  ...............  ...............
    Electronic system for travel          (46,318)         (55,168)         (55,168)         (55,168)         (+8,850)  ...............  ...............
     authorization fee...........
    Land border inspection fee...         (35,935)         (42,941)         (42,941)         (42,941)         (+7,006)  ...............  ...............
    COBRA passenger inspection           (419,352)        (694,627)        (694,627)        (694,627)       (+275,275)  ...............  ...............
     fee.........................
    APHIS inspection fee.........        (329,000)        (355,216)        (355,216)        (355,216)        (+26,216)  ...............  ...............
    Global Entry user fee........         (13,743)         (34,835)         (34,835)         (34,835)        (+21,092)  ...............  ...............
    Virgin Island fee............  ...............         (11,302)         (11,302)         (11,302)        (+11,302)  ...............  ...............
    Puerto Rico collections......         (96,367)         (98,602)         (98,602)         (98,602)         (+2,235)  ...............  ...............
    Small airport user fee.......          (8,318)  ...............  ...............  ...............         (-8,318)  ...............  ...............
    Customs unclaimed goods......  ...............          (5,992)          (5,992)          (5,992)         (+5,992)  ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, fee accounts.....      (1,518,916)      (2,063,723)      (2,063,723)      (2,063,723)       (+544,807)  ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, U.S. Customs and          11,876,784       12,786,570       12,680,421       12,423,734         +546,950         -362,836         -256,687
       Border Protection.........
          Appropriations.........     (10,356,201)     (10,722,847)     (10,616,698)     (10,360,011)         (+3,810)       (-362,836)       (-256,687)
          Emergency                        (1,667)  ...............  ...............  ...............         (-1,667)  ...............  ...............
           appropriations........
          Fee accounts...........      (1,518,916)      (2,063,723)      (2,063,723)      (2,063,723)       (+544,807)  ...............  ...............
                                  ======================================================================================================================
   U.S. Immigration and Customs
           Enforcement

Salaries and expenses:
    Headquarters management and
     administration:
        Personnel compensation            219,754          192,236          209,755          189,909          -29,845           -2,327          -19,846
         and benefits, services
         and other costs.........
        Headquarters managed IT           160,252          141,294          151,132          140,808          -19,444             -486          -10,324
         investment..............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............         380,006          333,530          360,887          330,717          -49,289           -2,813          -30,170

    Legal Proceedings............         206,768          204,651          205,921          202,584           -4,184           -2,067           -3,337
    Investigations:
        Domestic investigations..       1,684,633        1,599,972        1,710,172        1,603,888          -80,745           +3,916         -106,284
        International
         Investigations:
            International                 114,970          100,544          100,187           99,741          -15,229             -803             -446
             operations..........
            Visa Security Program          34,515           31,630           31,541           31,541           -2,974              -89   ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal...........         149,485          132,174          131,728          131,282          -18,203             -892             -446
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal,                 1,834,118        1,732,146        1,841,900        1,735,170          -98,948           +3,024         -106,730
               Investigations....

    Intelligence.................          78,348           75,448           74,908           74,908           -3,440             -540   ...............

    Detention and removal
     operations:
        Custody operations.......       2,022,344        1,844,802        2,038,239        1,879,239         -143,105          +34,437         -159,000
        Fugitive operations......         145,133          125,771          134,802          124,802          -20,331             -969          -10,000
        Criminal alien program...         216,224          291,721          289,155          294,155          +77,931           +2,434           +5,000
        Alternatives to detention          96,430           72,435           96,460           96,181             -249          +23,746             -279
        Transportation and                269,845          255,984          276,925          255,925          -13,920              -59          -21,000
         removal program.........
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............       2,749,976        2,590,713        2,835,581        2,650,302          -99,674          +59,589         -185,279

    Secure Communities...........         138,067           20,334           25,264           20,264         -117,803              -70           -5,000
    Emergency appropriations                  855   ...............  ...............  ...............            -855   ...............  ...............
     (Public Law 113-2)..........
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Salaries and            5,388,138        4,956,822        5,344,461        5,013,945         -374,193          +57,123         -330,516
       expenses..................

Automation Modernization:
    IT Investment................  ...............  ...............           8,400            8,400           +8,400           +8,400   ...............
    TECS modernization...........          22,970           34,900           23,000           23,000              +30          -11,900   ...............
    Detention and removals                  6,991   ...............  ...............  ...............          -6,991   ...............  ...............
     modernization...............
    Electronic health records....           3,495   ...............           3,500            3,500               +5           +3,500   ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................          33,456           34,900           34,900           34,900           +1,444   ...............  ...............

Construction.....................           4,993            5,000            5,000            5,000               +7   ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, U.S. Immigration and       5,426,587        4,996,722        5,384,361        5,053,845         -372,742          +57,123         -330,516
       Customs Enforcement direct
       appropriations............
                                  ======================================================================================================================
Fee Accounts:
    Immigration inspection user          (116,869)        (135,000)        (135,000)        (135,000)        (+18,131)  ...............  ...............
     fee.........................
    Breached bond/detention fund.         (75,000)         (65,000)         (65,000)         (65,000)        (-10,000)  ...............  ...............
    Student exchange and visitor         (120,000)        (145,000)        (145,000)        (145,000)        (+25,000)  ...............  ...............
     fee.........................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         311,869          345,000          345,000          345,000          +33,131   ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, U.S. Immigration and       5,738,456        5,341,722        5,729,361        5,398,845         -339,611          +57,123         -330,516
       Customs Enforcement.......
          Appropriations.........      (5,425,732)      (4,996,722)      (5,384,361)      (5,053,845)       (-371,887)        (+57,123)       (-330,516)
          Emergency                          (855)  ...............  ...............  ...............           (-855)  ...............  ...............
           appropriations........
          Fee accounts...........        (311,869)        (345,000)        (345,000)        (345,000)        (+33,131)  ...............  ...............
                                  ======================================================================================================================
     Transportation Security
          Administration

Aviation Security:
    Screening Operations:
        Screener workforce:
            Privatized screening.         147,575          153,190          163,190          153,190           +5,615   ...............         -10,000
            Undistributed          ...............  ...............          31,810   ...............  ...............  ...............         -31,810
             increase............
            Screener personnel,         3,076,311        3,033,526        2,972,715        2,982,847          -93,464          -50,679          +10,132
             compensation, and
             benefits............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal...........       3,223,886        3,186,716        3,167,715        3,136,037          -87,849          -50,679          -31,678

        Screener training and             224,809          226,936          203,057          226,857           +2,048              -79          +23,800
         other...................
        Checkpoint support.......         115,114          103,377          103,309          105,309           -9,805           +1,932           +2,000
        Undistributed increase...  ...............  ...............           3,000   ...............  ...............  ...............          -3,000

        EDS/ETD Systems:
            EDS procurement and            99,852           83,987           83,845           83,845          -16,007             -142   ...............
             installation........
            Screening technology          308,759          298,509          298,509          298,509          -10,250   ...............  ...............
             maintenance,
             utilities...........
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal...........         408,611          382,496          382,354          382,354          -26,257             -142   ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Screening       3,972,420        3,899,525        3,859,435        3,850,557         -121,863          -48,968           -8,878
               operations........

    Aviation Security Direction
     and Enforcement:
        Aviation regulation and           367,968          354,650          358,187          353,187          -14,781           -1,463           -5,000
         other enforcement.......
        Airport management and            561,911          590,871          555,242          588,317          +26,406           -2,554          +33,075
         support.................
        Federal flight deck                24,711   ...............          12,353           25,000             +289          +25,000          +12,647
         officer and flight crew
         training................
        Air cargo................         121,674          122,990          122,332          122,332             +658             -658   ...............
        Undistributed increase...  ...............  ...............          12,500   ...............  ...............  ...............         -12,500
        Undistributed reductions.  ...............  ...............         -44,310   ...............  ...............  ...............         +44,310
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............       1,076,264        1,068,511        1,016,304        1,088,836          +12,572          +20,325          +72,532

    Aviation Security Capital            (250,000)        (250,000)        (250,000)        (250,000)  ...............  ...............  ...............
     Fund (mandatory)............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Aviation security          5,048,684        4,968,036        4,875,739        4,939,393         -109,291          -28,643          +63,654
       (gross)...................

Aviation security fees                 -2,070,000       -2,120,000       -2,120,000       -2,120,000          -50,000   ...............  ...............
 (offsetting collections)........
Additional offsetting collections  ...............        -105,000   ...............  ...............  ...............        +105,000   ...............
 (leg. proposal).................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Aviation security          2,978,684        2,743,036        2,755,739        2,819,393         -159,291          +76,357          +63,654
       (net, discretionary)......

Surface Transportation Security:
    Staffing and operations......          36,305           35,433           35,262           35,262           -1,043             -171   ...............
    Surface transportation                 87,949           73,898           73,356           73,356          -14,593             -542   ...............
     security inspectors and
     canines.....................
    Undistributed increase.......  ...............  ...............          15,676   ...............  ...............  ...............         -15,676
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         124,254          109,331          124,294          108,618          -15,636             -713          -15,676

Transportation Threat Assessment
 and Credentialing:
    Secure flight................         106,794          106,198          108,198          105,919             -875             -279           -2,279
    Crew and other vetting                 85,376           74,419           74,419           74,287          -11,089             -132             -132
     programs....................
    TWIC fees....................         (47,300)         (36,700)         (36,700)         (36,700)        (-10,600)  ...............  ...............
    Hazardous materials fees.....         (12,000)         (12,000)         (12,000)         (12,000)  ...............  ...............  ...............
    Alien Flight School fees (by           (5,000)          (5,000)          (5,000)          (5,000)  ...............  ...............  ...............
     transfer from DOJ)..........
    Air Cargo/Certified cargo              (7,200)          (5,400)          (5,400)          (5,400)         (-1,800)  ...............  ...............
     screening program...........
    Commercial aviation and                (8,000)          (6,500)          (6,500)          (6,500)         (-1,500)  ...............  ...............
     airports/Secure
     identification display area
     checks......................
    Other security threat                    (120)             (50)             (50)             (50)            (-70)  ...............  ...............
     assessments.................
    General aviation at DCA......            (100)            (350)            (350)            (350)           (+250)  ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         271,890          246,617          248,617          246,206          -25,684             -411           -2,411
          Direct appropriations..        (192,170)        (180,617)        (182,617)        (180,206)        (-11,964)           (-411)         (-2,411)
          Fee funded programs....         (79,720)         (66,000)         (66,000)         (66,000)        (-13,720)  ...............  ...............

Transportation Security Support:
    Headquarters administration..         275,758          284,942          265,712          276,000             +242           -8,942          +10,288
    Information technology.......         416,645          455,484          389,750          450,000          +33,355           -5,484          +60,250
    Human capital services.......         215,544          212,554          201,643          208,000           -7,544           -4,554           +6,357
    Intelligence.................          45,070           44,809           44,561           44,561             -509             -248   ...............
    Undistributed reduction......  ...............  ...............          -4,000   ...............  ...............  ...............          +4,000
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         953,017          997,789          897,666          978,561          +25,544          -19,228          +80,895

Federal Air Marshals:
    Management and administration         792,738          714,669          709,254          709,254          -83,484           -5,415   ...............
    Travel and training..........         113,821          111,853          111,853          111,853           -1,968   ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         906,559          826,522          821,107          821,107          -85,452           -5,415   ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Transportation             7,554,404        7,398,295        7,217,423        7,343,885         -210,519          -54,410         +126,462
       Security Administration...
                                  ======================================================================================================================
Offsetting collections...........     (-2,070,000)     (-2,225,000)     (-2,120,000)     (-2,120,000)        (-50,000)       (+105,000)  ...............
Aviation security capital fund           (250,000)        (250,000)        (250,000)        (250,000)  ...............  ...............  ...............
 (mandatory).....................
Fee funded programs..............         (79,720)         (66,000)         (66,000)         (66,000)        (-13,720)  ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Transportation             5,154,684        4,857,295        4,781,423        4,907,885         -246,799          +50,590         +126,462
       Security Administration
       (net).....................
                                  ======================================================================================================================
           Coast Guard

Operating Expenses:
    Military pay and allowances..       3,410,674        3,425,306        3,440,053        3,434,674          +24,000           +9,368           -5,379
    Civilian pay and benefits....         785,542          784,097          779,011          779,320           -6,222           -4,777             +309
    Training and recruiting......         213,900          181,617          216,588          199,907          -13,993          +18,290          -16,681
    Operating funds and unit            1,092,449        1,061,567        1,065,083        1,064,361          -28,088           +2,794             -722
     level maintenance...........
    Centrally managed accounts...         350,609          318,856          319,307          319,147          -31,462             +291             -160
    Intermediate and depot level          958,606          983,940        1,019,374          989,137          +30,531           +5,197          -30,237
     maintenance.................
    St. Elizabeths support costs.  ...............  ...............  ...............          12,800          +12,800          +12,800          +12,800
    Overseas contingency                  254,000   ...............  ...............         227,000          -27,000         +227,000         +227,000
     operations/Global war on
     terrorism...................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................       7,065,780        6,755,383        6,839,416        7,026,346          -39,434         +270,963         +186,930
          (Defense)..............        (593,551)        (340,000)        (340,000)        (567,000)        (-26,551)       (+227,000)       (+227,000)
          (Nondefense)...........      (6,472,229)      (6,415,383)      (6,499,416)      (6,459,346)        (-12,883)        (+43,963)        (-40,070)

Environmental compliance and               13,134           13,187           13,164           13,165              +31              -22               +1
 restoration.....................
Reserve training.................         132,353          109,543          112,991          122,491           -9,862          +12,948           +9,500

Acquisition, Construction, and
 Improvements:
    Vessels:
        Survey and design-vessel            2,497            1,000            1,000            1,000           -1,497   ...............  ...............
         and boats...............
        Response boat-medium.....           7,989   ...............  ...............          10,000           +2,011          +10,000          +10,000
        In-service vessel          ...............          21,000           21,000           21,000          +21,000   ...............  ...............
         sustainment.............
        National security cutter.         678,404          616,000          603,553          632,000          -46,404          +16,000          +28,447
        Offshore patrol cutter...          29,960           25,000           25,000           25,000           -4,960   ...............  ...............
        Fast response cutter.....         334,558           75,000          205,000          310,000          -24,558         +235,000         +105,000
        Cutter small boats.......           3,995            3,000            3,000            3,000             -995   ...............  ...............
        Medium endurance cutter            15,979   ...............  ...............  ...............         -15,979   ...............  ...............
         sustainment.............
        Polar ice breaking vessel           7,989            2,000            2,000            2,000           -5,989   ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............       1,081,371          743,000          860,553        1,004,000          -77,371         +261,000         +143,447

    Aircraft:
        Airframe replacement               13,982   ...............          30,000   ...............         -13,982   ...............         -30,000
         (CGNR 6017).............
        Maritime patrol aircraft.          54,927   ...............  ...............  ...............         -54,927   ...............  ...............
        Long range surveillance            89,881           16,000          107,710           16,000          -73,881   ...............         -91,710
         aircraft................
        HH-65 conversion/                  31,458           12,000           12,000           12,000          -19,458   ...............  ...............
         sustainment projects....
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............         190,248           28,000          149,710           28,000         -162,248   ...............        -121,710

    Other Acquisition Programs:
        Program oversight and              14,980           10,000           10,000           10,000           -4,980   ...............  ...............
         management..............
        Systems engineering and    ...............             204              204              204             +204   ...............  ...............
         integration.............
        C4ISR....................          40,447           35,226           50,226           35,226           -5,221   ...............         -15,000
        CG-Logistics Information            2,497            1,500            1,500            1,500             -997   ...............  ...............
         Management system.......
        Nationwide automatic                5,992           13,000           13,000           13,000           +7,008   ...............  ...............
         identification system...
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............          63,916           59,930           74,930           59,930           -3,986   ...............         -15,000

    Shore Facilities and Aids to
     Navigation:
        Major construction;                29,960            2,000            2,000            2,000          -27,960   ...............  ...............
         Housing; ATON; and
         survey and design.......
        Major acquisition systems          49,346   ...............  ...............  ...............         -49,346   ...............  ...............
         infrastructure..........
        Minor shore..............           4,993            3,000            3,000            3,000           -1,993   ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............          84,299            5,000            5,000            5,000          -79,299   ...............  ...............
    Military Housing.............           9,987   ...............          18,000           18,000           +8,013          +18,000   ...............

    Personnel and Related
     Support:
        Direct personnel costs...         112,933          114,747          114,080          114,315           +1,382             -432             +235
        Core acquisition costs...             599              439              439              439             -160   ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............         113,532          115,186          114,519          114,754           +1,222             -432             +235

    Emergency appropriations              274,233   ...............  ...............  ...............        -274,233   ...............  ...............
     (Public Law 113-2)..........
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Acquisition,            1,817,586          951,116        1,222,712        1,229,684         -587,902         +278,568           +6,972
       construction, and
       improvements..............

Research, development, test, and           19,664           19,856            9,928           19,781             +117              -75           +9,853
 evaluation......................
Health care fund contribution             203,000          201,000          201,000          201,000           -2,000   ...............  ...............
 (permanent indefinite
 discretionary appropriation)....
Retired pay (mandatory)..........       1,423,000        1,460,000        1,460,000        1,460,000          +37,000   ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Coast Guard.........      10,674,517        9,510,085        9,859,211       10,072,467         -602,050         +562,382         +213,256
          Appropriations.........     (10,146,284)      (9,510,085)      (9,859,211)      (9,845,467)       (-300,817)       (+335,382)        (-13,744)
          Emergency                      (274,233)  ...............  ...............  ...............       (-274,233)  ...............  ...............
           appropriations........
          Overseas contingency           (254,000)  ...............  ...............        (227,000)        (-27,000)       (+227,000)       (+227,000)
           operations/Global war
           on terrorism..........
                                  ======================================================================================================================
   United States Secret Service

Salaries and Expenses:
    Protection:
        Protection of persons and         854,107          822,591          848,263          846,662           -7,445          +24,071           -1,601
         facilities..............
        Protective intelligence            68,035           67,782           67,165           67,165             -870             -617   ...............
         activities..............
        National special security           4,494            4,500            4,500   ...............          -4,494           -4,500           -4,500
         event fund..............
        Presidential candidate             57,884   ...............  ...............           4,500          -53,384           +4,500           +4,500
         nominee protection......
        White House mail           ...............          18,487   ...............  ...............  ...............         -18,487   ...............
         screening...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............         984,520          913,360          919,928          918,327          -66,193           +4,967           -1,601

    Investigations:
        Domestic field operations         299,295          259,465          330,391          327,297          +28,002          +67,832           -3,094
        International field                30,930           30,958           30,811           30,811             -119             -147   ...............
         office administration,
         operations and training.
        Electronic crimes special  ...............          56,968   ...............  ...............  ...............         -56,968   ...............
         agent program and
         electronic crimes task
         forces..................
        Support for missing and             8,355   ...............           8,358            8,366              +11           +8,366               +8
         exploited children......
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............         338,580          347,391          369,560          366,474          +27,894          +19,083           -3,086

    Headquarters, management and          174,104          177,282          188,964          188,964          +14,860          +11,682   ...............
     administration..............
    Rowley Training Center.......          55,525           55,552           55,118           55,118             -407             -434   ...............
    Information integration and             1,132            1,029            1,019            1,019             -113              -10   ...............
     technology transformation...
    Emergency appropriations                  300   ...............  ...............  ...............            -300   ...............  ...............
     (Public Law 113-2)..........
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Salaries and            1,554,161        1,494,614        1,534,589        1,529,902          -24,259          +35,288           -4,687
       expenses..................

Acquisition, construction,
 improvements, and related
 expenses:
    Facilities...................           4,424            5,380            5,380            5,380             +956   ...............  ...............
    Information integration and            52,251           46,395           46,395           46,395           -5,856   ...............  ...............
     technology transformation...
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................          56,675           51,775           51,775           51,775           -4,900   ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, United States Secret       1,610,836        1,546,389        1,586,364        1,581,677          -29,159          +35,288           -4,687
       Service...................
                                  ======================================================================================================================
      Total, title II, Security,       33,224,492       31,633,338       32,228,057       31,975,885       -1,248,607         +342,547         -252,172
       Enforcement, and
       Investigations............
          Appropriations.........     (32,693,437)     (31,633,338)     (32,228,057)     (31,748,885)       (-944,552)       (+115,547)       (-479,172)
          Emergency                      (277,055)  ...............  ...............  ...............       (-277,055)  ...............  ...............
           appropriations........
          Overseas contingency           (254,000)  ...............  ...............        (227,000)        (-27,000)       (+227,000)       (+227,000)
           operations/Global war
           on terrorism..........
      (Fee Accounts).............      (1,910,505)      (2,474,723)      (2,474,723)      (2,474,723)       (+564,218)  ...............  ...............
                                  ======================================================================================================================
      TITLE III--PROTECTION,
   PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND
             RECOVERY

 National Protection and Programs
           Directorate

Management and administration:
    Administrative activities....          50,154           64,725           50,522           59,523           +9,369           -5,202           +9,001

Infrastructure protection and
 information security:
    Infrastructure Protection:
        Infrastructure analysis            58,891           57,975           66,144           66,134           +7,243           +8,159              -10
         and planning............
        Sector management and              66,973           60,477           60,335           64,988           -1,985           +4,511           +4,653
         governance..............
        Regional field operations          56,344           56,708           56,550           56,550             +206             -158   ...............
        Infrastructure security            77,842           85,790           77,104           85,542           +7,700             -248           +8,438
         compliance..............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal,                       260,050          260,950          260,133          273,214          +13,164          +12,264          +13,081
           Infrastructure
           protection............

    Cybersecurity and
     communications:
        Cybersecurity:
            Cybersecurity                   3,981            4,338            4,320            4,320             +339              -18   ...............
             coordination........
            US Computer Emergency          92,804          102,636          102,486          102,486           +9,682             -150   ...............
             Readiness Team [US-
             CERT] Operations....
            Federal network               235,681          199,769          199,725          199,725          -35,956              -44   ...............
             security............
            Network security              328,575          406,441          382,367          393,302          +64,727          -13,139          +10,935
             deployment..........
            Global cybersecurity           25,921           19,057           19,037           25,892              -29           +6,835           +6,855
             management..........
            Critical                       62,665           73,043           73,013           73,013          +10,348              -30   ...............
             infrastructure cyber
             protection and
             awareness...........
            Business operations..           6,203            5,125            5,089            5,089           -1,114              -36   ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal,                   755,830          810,409          786,037          803,827          +47,997           -6,582          +17,790
               Cybersecurity.....

        Communications:
            Office of emergency            38,603           36,516           36,446           37,946             -657           +1,430           +1,500
             communications......
            Priority                       53,195           53,412           53,372           53,372             +177              -40   ...............
             telecommunications
             services............
            Next generation                24,467           21,160           21,158           21,158           -3,309               -2   ...............
             networks............
            Programs to study and          12,913           10,102           10,074           10,074           -2,839              -28   ...............
             enhance
             telecommunications..
            Critical                       10,946            9,445            9,409            9,409           -1,537              -36   ...............
             infrastructure
             protection programs.
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal,                   140,124          130,635          130,459          131,959           -8,165           +1,324           +1,500
               Communications....
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal,                   895,954          941,044          916,496          935,786          +39,832           -5,258          +19,290
               Cybersecurity and
               communications....
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal,                 1,156,004        1,201,994        1,176,629        1,209,000          +52,996           +7,006          +32,371
               Infrastructure
               protection and
               information secur-
                ity..............

Federal Protective Service:
    Basic security...............         271,540          271,540          271,540          271,540   ...............  ...............  ...............
    Building-specific security...         509,056          509,056          509,056          509,056   ...............  ...............  ...............
    Reimbursable security fees            521,228          521,228          521,228          521,228   ...............  ...............  ...............
     (contract guard services)...
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Federal                 1,301,824        1,301,824        1,301,824        1,301,824   ...............  ...............  ...............
       Protective Service........

    Offsetting collections.......      -1,301,824       -1,301,824       -1,301,824       -1,301,824   ...............  ...............  ...............

Office of Biometric Identity              232,115   ...............         232,190          205,967          -26,148         +205,967          -26,223
 Management......................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, National Protection        2,740,097        2,568,543        2,761,165        2,776,314          +36,217         +207,771          +15,149
       and Programs Directorate
       (gross)...................
                                  ======================================================================================================================
          Offsetting collections.     (-1,301,824)     (-1,301,824)     (-1,301,824)     (-1,301,824)  ...............  ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, National Protection        1,438,273        1,266,719        1,459,341        1,474,490          +36,217         +207,771          +15,149
       and Programs Directorate
       (net).....................
                                  ======================================================================================================================
     Office of Health Affairs

BioWatch.........................          85,277           90,609           79,534           87,609           +2,332           -3,000           +8,075
National Biosurveillance                   12,983            8,000           13,000            8,000           -4,983   ...............          -5,000
 Integration Center..............
Chemical Defense Program.........           1,997              824              824              824           -1,173   ...............  ...............
Planning and Coordination........           5,400            4,995            4,995            4,995             -405   ...............  ...............
Salaries and Expenses............          26,667           27,369           25,072           26,261             -406           -1,108           +1,189
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Office of Health             132,324          131,797          123,425          127,689           -4,635           -4,108           +4,264
       Affairs...................
                                  ======================================================================================================================
   Federal Emergency Management
              Agency

Salaries and expenses:
    Administrative and regional           257,069          240,736          229,213          250,748           -6,321          +10,012          +21,535
     offices.....................
        Office of National                 (4,287)          (2,602)  ...............          (4,293)             (+6)         (+1,691)         (+4,293)
         Capital Region
         Coordination............
    Preparedness and protection..         178,811          293,684          174,766          176,406           -2,405         -117,278           +1,640
    Response.....................         179,191          171,665          178,504          179,081             -110           +7,416             +577
        Urban search and rescue           (35,134)         (27,513)  ...............         (35,180)            (+46)         (+7,667)        (+35,180)
         response system.........
    Recovery.....................          55,226           55,530           55,121           55,121             -105             -409   ...............
    Mitigation...................          29,775           25,882           25,808           28,416           -1,359           +2,534           +2,608
    Mission support..............         157,326          144,580          148,744          148,744           -8,582           +4,164   ...............
    Centrally managed accounts...         114,436          110,306          110,306          110,306           -4,130   ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Salaries and              971,834        1,042,383          922,462          948,822          -23,012          -93,561          +26,360
       expenses..................
          (Defense)..............         (56,000)         (77,000)         (67,000)         (77,000)        (+21,000)  ...............        (+10,000)
          (Nondefense)...........        (915,834)        (965,383)        (855,462)        (871,822)        (-44,012)        (-93,561)        (+16,360)
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Salaries and              971,834        1,042,383          922,462          948,822          -23,012          -93,561          +26,360
       expenses..................

Grants and training:
    State and local programs:
        Discretionary state and           188,683   ...............       1,069,826   ...............        -188,683   ...............      -1,069,826
         local grants............

        State Homeland security           346,143   ...............  ...............         453,000         +106,857         +453,000         +453,000
         grant program...........
        General increase.........  ...............  ...............          10,000   ...............  ...............  ...............         -10,000
            Operation Stonegarden         (46,539)  ...............  ...............         (46,600)            (+61)        (+46,600)        (+46,600)

        Urban area security               499,716   ...............  ...............         614,152         +114,436         +614,152         +614,152
         initiative..............
            Nonprofit security             (9,987)  ...............  ...............         (13,000)         (+3,013)        (+13,000)        (+13,000)
             grants..............

        Public transportation              97,371   ...............          97,500          100,640           +3,269         +100,640           +3,140
         security assistance and
         railroad security
         assistance..............
            Amtrak security......          (9,987)  ...............  ...............         (10,000)            (+13)        (+10,000)        (+10,000)

        Port security grants.....          97,371   ...............          97,500          100,640           +3,269         +100,640           +3,140
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, discretionary       1,229,284   ...............       1,274,826        1,268,432          +39,148       +1,268,432           -6,394
           grants................

        Education, training, and
         exercises:
            Emergency Management           17,782   ...............          17,805           20,569           +2,787          +20,569           +2,764
             Institute...........
            Center for Domestic            64,905   ...............          64,991           64,905   ...............         +64,905              -86
             Preparedness........
            National Domestic              92,877   ...............          93,000           98,000           +5,123          +98,000           +5,000
             Preparedness
             Consortium..........
            National exercise              32,335   ...............          32,378           21,094          -11,241          +21,094          -11,284
             program.............
            Continuing training..          26,964   ...............          27,000           29,000           +2,036          +29,000           +2,000
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal...........         234,863   ...............         235,174          233,568           -1,295         +233,568           -1,606

        National preparedness      ...............       1,043,200   ...............  ...............  ...............      -1,043,200   ...............
         grant program...........

        First responder
         assistance program:
            Emergency management   ...............         350,000   ...............  ...............  ...............        -350,000   ...............
             performance grants..
            Fire grants..........  ...............         335,000   ...............  ...............  ...............        -335,000   ...............
            Staffing for Adequate  ...............         335,000   ...............  ...............  ...............        -335,000   ...............
             Fire and Emergency
             Response (SAFER) Act
             grants..............
            Training partnership   ...............          60,000   ...............  ...............  ...............         -60,000   ...............
             grants..............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, First      ...............       1,080,000   ...............  ...............  ...............      -1,080,000   ...............
               Responder
               Assistance Program
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, State and       1,464,147        2,123,200        1,510,000        1,502,000          +37,853         -621,200           -8,000
               Local Programs....
                  (Defense)......         (46,539)  ...............  ...............  ...............        (-46,539)  ...............  ...............
                  (Nondefense)...      (1,417,608)      (2,123,200)      (1,510,000)      (1,502,000)        (+84,392)       (-621,200)         (-8,000)
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, State and       1,464,147        2,123,200        1,510,000        1,502,000          +37,853         -621,200           -8,000
               Local Programs....

    Firefighter assistance
     grants:
        Fire grants..............         337,055   ...............         340,000          337,500             +445         +337,500           -2,500
        Staffing for Adequate             337,055   ...............         340,000          337,500             +445         +337,500           -2,500
         Fire and Emergency
         Response [SAFER] Act
         grants..................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal...............         674,110   ...............         680,000          675,000             +890         +675,000           -5,000

    Emergency management                  349,538   ...............         350,000          350,000             +462         +350,000   ...............
     performance grants..........
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Grants and              2,487,795        2,123,200        2,540,000        2,527,000          +39,205         +403,800          -13,000
       Training..................

Radiological emergency                     -1,443           -1,272           -1,272           -1,272             +171   ...............  ...............
 preparedness program............
United States Fire Administration          43,942           41,306           42,162           44,000              +58           +2,694           +1,838
    Undistributed increase.......  ...............  ...............           1,838   ...............  ...............  ...............          -1,838

Disaster Relief Fund:
    Base disaster relief.........         607,124          594,522          594,522          594,522          -12,602   ...............  ...............
    Disaster relief category.....       6,400,000        5,626,386        5,626,386        5,626,386         -773,614   ...............  ...............
    Disaster relief category            5,379,000   ...............  ...............  ...............      -5,379,000   ...............  ...............
     (Public Law 113-2)..........
    Emergency appropriations            6,108,735   ...............  ...............  ...............      -6,108,735   ...............  ...............
     (Public Law 113-2)..........
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Disaster Relief        18,494,859        6,220,908        6,220,908        6,220,908      -12,273,951   ...............  ...............
       Fund......................

Disaster Assistance Direct Loan
 Program Account:
    Direct loan subsidy                   300,000   ...............  ...............  ...............        -300,000   ...............  ...............
     (emergency appropriations)
     (Public Law 113-2)..........

Flood Hazard Mapping and Risk              95,203           84,361           95,202           95,203   ...............         +10,842               +1
 Analysis Program................

National Flood Insurance Fund:
    Salaries and expenses........          22,000           22,000           22,000           22,000   ...............  ...............  ...............
    Flood plain management and            149,000          154,300          154,300          154,300           +5,300   ...............  ...............
     mapping.....................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         171,000          176,300          176,300          176,300           +5,300   ...............  ...............

    Offsetting fee collections...        -171,000         -176,300         -176,300         -176,300           -5,300   ...............  ...............

National predisaster mitigation            24,967   ...............          22,500           25,000              +33          +25,000           +2,500
 fund............................
    General increase.............  ...............  ...............           7,655   ...............  ...............  ...............          -7,655

Emergency food and shelter.......         119,842          100,000          120,000          120,000             +158          +20,000   ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Federal Emergency         22,536,999        9,610,886        9,971,455        9,979,661      -12,557,338         +368,775           +8,206
       Management Agency.........
          Appropriations.........      (4,349,264)      (3,984,500)      (4,345,069)      (4,353,275)         (+4,011)       (+368,775)         (+8,206)
          Disaster relief             (11,779,000)      (5,626,386)      (5,626,386)      (5,626,386)     (-6,152,614)  ...............  ...............
           category..............
                                  ======================================================================================================================
      Total, title III,                24,107,596       11,009,402       11,554,221       11,581,840      -12,525,756         +572,438          +27,619
       Protection, Preparedness,
       Response and Recovery
       Directorate...............
          Appropriations.........      (5,919,861)      (5,383,016)      (5,927,835)      (5,955,454)        (+35,593)       (+572,438)        (+27,619)
          Emergency                    (6,408,735)  ...............  ...............  ...............     (-6,408,735)  ...............  ...............
           appropriations........
          Disaster relief             (11,779,000)      (5,626,386)      (5,626,386)      (5,626,386)     (-6,152,614)  ...............  ...............
           category..............
                                  ======================================================================================================================
      TITLE IV--RESEARCH AND
    DEVELOPMENT, TRAINING, AND
             SERVICES

  United States Citizenship and
       Immigration Services

Appropriations:
    E-Verify program.............         111,776          114,213          114,213          113,889           +2,113             -324             -324
    Immigrant integration          ...............          10,000   ...............           5,000           +5,000           -5,000           +5,000
     programs....................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         111,776          124,213          114,213          118,889           +7,113           -5,324           +4,676

Fee Accounts:
    Adjudication Services:
        District operations......      (1,313,702)      (1,510,836)      (1,536,880)      (1,541,880)       (+228,178)        (+31,044)         (+5,000)
            (Immigrant                     (7,500)  ...............  ...............          (5,000)         (-2,500)         (+5,000)         (+5,000)
             Integration Grants).
        Service center operations        (524,788)        (550,653)        (578,393)        (578,393)        (+53,605)        (+27,740)  ...............
        Asylum, refugee and              (196,584)        (236,494)        (236,710)        (236,710)        (+40,126)           (+216)  ...............
         international operations
        Records operations.......         (86,774)         (94,039)         (94,039)         (94,039)         (+7,265)  ...............  ...............
        Business transformation..        (269,216)        (183,464)        (183,464)        (183,464)        (-85,752)  ...............  ...............
            (Digitization                 (29,000)  ...............  ...............  ...............        (-29,000)  ...............  ...............
             program)............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal...........       2,391,064        2,575,486        2,629,486        2,634,486         +243,422          +59,000           +5,000

    Information and customer
     services:
        Operating expenses.......         (89,011)         (96,409)         (96,409)         (96,409)         (+7,398)  ...............  ...............
    Administration:
        Operating expenses.......        (382,334)        (339,421)        (339,421)        (339,421)        (-42,913)  ...............  ...............
    Systematic Alien Verification         (20,048)         (29,937)         (29,937)         (29,937)         (+9,889)  ...............  ...............
     for Entitlements [SAVE].....
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Fee accounts.....       2,882,457        3,041,253        3,095,253        3,100,253         +217,796          +59,000           +5,000

H1-B Visa fee account:
    Adjudication services:
        Service center operations  ...............         (13,000)  ...............  ...............  ...............        (-13,000)  ...............
H1-B and L fraud prevention fee
 account:
    Adjudication Services:
        District operations......  ...............         (41,000)  ...............  ...............  ...............        (-41,000)  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, Fee accounts....       2,882,457        3,095,253        3,095,253        3,100,253         +217,796           +5,000           +5,000
                                  ======================================================================================================================
          Total, United States         (2,994,233)      (3,219,466)      (3,209,466)      (3,219,142)       (+224,909)           (-324)         (+9,676)
           Citizenship and
           Immigration Services..
              Appropriations.....        (111,776)        (124,213)        (114,213)        (118,889)         (+7,113)         (-5,324)         (+4,676)
              Fee accounts.......      (2,882,457)      (3,095,253)      (3,095,253)      (3,100,253)       (+217,796)         (+5,000)         (+5,000)
                                  ======================================================================================================================
 Federal Law Enforcement Training
              Center

Salaries and Expenses:
    Law enforcement training.....         197,743          210,818          198,317          198,317             +574          -12,501   ...............
    Management and administration          29,125           28,420           28,228           28,228             -897             -192   ...............
    Accreditation................           1,298            1,306            1,300            1,300               +2               -6   ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         228,166          240,544          227,845          227,845             -321          -12,699   ...............

Acquisitions, construction,                28,348           30,885           30,885           30,885           +2,537   ...............  ...............
 improvements, and related
 expenses........................
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Federal Law                  256,514          271,429          258,730          258,730           +2,216          -12,699   ...............
       Enforcement Training
       Center....................
                                  ======================================================================================================================
      Science and Technology

Management and administration....         131,826          129,608          129,000          129,000           -2,826             -608   ...............

Research, development,
 acquisition, and operations:
    Research, development, and            449,960          467,000   ...............  ...............        -449,960         -467,000   ...............
     innovation..................
        Apex R&D.................  ...............  ...............          15,013           15,013          +15,013          +15,013   ...............
        Border security..........  ...............  ...............          31,580           43,563          +43,563          +43,563          +11,983
        Chem/Bio and explosives    ...............  ...............         194,294          182,611         +182,611         +182,611          -11,683
         defense.................
        Counterterrorist R&D.....  ...............  ...............          24,561           24,561          +24,561          +24,561   ...............
        Cyber security...........  ...............  ...............          70,829           74,529          +74,529          +74,529           +3,700
        Disaster resilience......  ...............  ...............         130,723          126,723         +126,723         +126,723           -4,000
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Research,             449,960          467,000          467,000          467,000          +17,040   ...............  ...............
           development and
           innovation............

    Laboratory facilities........         164,714          857,785          547,785          547,785         +383,071         -310,000   ...............
    Acquisition and operations             47,921           41,703           41,703           41,703           -6,218   ...............  ...............
     support.....................
    University programs..........          39,947           31,000           40,000           33,000           -6,947           +2,000           -7,000
    Emergency appropriations                3,249   ...............  ...............  ...............          -3,249   ...............  ...............
     (Public Law 113-2)..........
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         705,791        1,397,488        1,096,488        1,089,488         +383,697         -308,000           -7,000
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Science and                  837,617        1,527,096        1,225,488        1,218,488         +380,871         -308,608           -7,000
       Technology................
                                  ======================================================================================================================
Domestic Nuclear Detection Office

Management and administration....          39,598           37,510           37,353           37,353           -2,245             -157   ...............

Research, development, and
 operations:
    Systems engineering and                29,960           21,222           21,222           21,000           -8,960             -222             -222
     architecture................
    Systems development..........          27,963           21,243           21,243           21,000           -6,963             -243             -243
    Transformational research and          74,667           75,291           75,291           75,000             +333             -291             -291
     development.................
    Assessments..................          32,956           39,918           39,918           39,300           +6,344             -618             -618
    Operations support...........          35,453           30,835           30,835           30,200           -5,253             -635             -635
    National Technical Nuclear             25,530           22,701           22,701           22,700           -2,830               -1               -1
     Forensics Center............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................         226,529          211,210          211,210          209,200          -17,329           -2,010           -2,010

Systems Acquisition:
    Radiation portal monitor                1,353            7,000            7,000            7,000           +5,647   ...............  ...............
     program.....................
    Securing the cities..........          21,971           22,000           22,000           22,000              +29   ...............  ...............
    Human portable radiation               28,063           13,600           13,600           13,600          -14,463   ...............  ...............
     detection systems...........
    Emergency appropriations                3,869   ...............  ...............  ...............          -3,869   ...............  ...............
     (Public Law 113-2)..........
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...................          55,256           42,600           42,600           42,600          -12,656   ...............  ...............
                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Domestic Nuclear             321,383          291,320          291,163          289,153          -32,230           -2,167           -2,010
       Detection Office..........
                                  ======================================================================================================================
      Total, title IV, Research         1,527,290        2,214,058        1,889,594        1,885,260         +357,970         -328,798           -4,334
       and Development, Training,
       and Services..............
          Appropriations.........      (1,520,172)      (2,214,058)      (1,889,594)      (1,885,260)       (+365,088)       (-328,798)         (-4,334)
          Emergency                        (7,118)  ...............  ...............  ...............         (-7,118)  ...............  ...............
           appropriations........
      (Fee Accounts).............      (2,882,457)      (3,095,253)      (3,095,253)      (3,100,253)       (+217,796)         (+5,000)         (+5,000)
                                  ======================================================================================================================
   TITLE V--GENERAL PROVISIONS

USCIS Immigrant integration                 2,497   ...............  ...............  ...............          -2,497   ...............  ...............
 grants..........................
NSSE reimbursement fund..........           4,993   ...............  ...............  ...............          -4,993   ...............  ...............
Data center migration............          54,927   ...............          34,200           54,200             -727          +54,200          +20,000
DHS Consolidated headquarters              28,962   ...............  ...............          43,300          +14,338          +43,300          +43,300
 project.........................
Community disaster loans.........          13,000   ...............  ...............  ...............         -13,000   ...............  ...............
DHS Lapsed balances (lapsed               -24,921   ...............  ...............          -1,718          +23,203           -1,718           -1,718
 appropriations).................
Rescission of NPPD IPIS                    -1,683   ...............  ...............  ...............          +1,683   ...............  ...............
 unobligated balances............
DHS appropriations (legacy)                -7,680   ...............  ...............  ...............          +7,680   ...............  ...............
 (rescission)....................
Working capital fund (rescission)  ...............  ...............          -9,000   ...............  ...............  ...............          +9,000
 (defense).......................
Working capital fund (rescission)  ...............  ...............        -241,000   ...............  ...............  ...............        +241,000
 (nondefense)....................
Visa lottery fee.................  ...............         -50,000          -50,000          -50,000          -50,000   ...............  ...............
Analysis and operations                    -1,800   ...............  ...............  ...............          +1,800   ...............  ...............
 (rescission)....................
CBP BSFIT (rescission)...........         -73,232   ...............  ...............  ...............         +73,232   ...............  ...............
ICE Construction (rescission)....          -9,516   ...............  ...............  ...............          +9,516   ...............  ...............
TSA Surface transportation                -21,667   ...............  ...............  ...............         +21,667   ...............  ...............
 (rescission)....................
Rescission of NSC #5 fiscal year          -43,500   ...............  ...............  ...............         +43,500   ...............  ...............
 2011 funding....................
Rescission of NSC #4 fiscal year          -25,000   ...............  ...............  ...............         +25,000   ...............  ...............
 2010 funding....................
Rescission of NSC................         -25,000   ...............  ...............  ...............         +25,000   ...............  ...............
CBP BSFIT unobligated balance      ...............  ...............  ...............         -61,783          -61,783          -61,783          -61,783
 (rescission)....................
Columbia Free Trade Act            ...............         110,000   ...............         110,000         +110,000   ...............        +110,000
 Collections.....................
U.S. Coast Guard AC&I                     -15,000          -14,500          -14,500          -14,500             +500   ...............  ...............
 (rescission) (Public Law 111-83)
U.S. Coast Guard AC&I                     -15,000           -9,000          -21,612          -29,000          -14,000          -20,000           -7,388
 (rescission) (Public Law 112-10)
U.S. Coast Guard AC&I              ...............         -18,500          -41,000          -31,500          -31,500          -13,000           +9,500
 (rescission) (Public Law 112-74)
U.S. Coast Guard AC&I              ...............  ...............         -32,479   ...............  ...............  ...............         +32,479
 (rescission) (Public Law 113-6).
Patrol boats (fiscal year 2010)            -8,000   ...............  ...............  ...............          +8,000   ...............  ...............
 (rescission)....................
U.S. Coast Guard AC&I                      -5,000   ...............  ...............  ...............          +5,000   ...............  ...............
 (rescission)....................
H-60 (rescission)................          -3,000   ...............  ...............  ...............          +3,000   ...............  ...............
Program management (rescission)..          -5,000   ...............  ...............  ...............          +5,000   ...............  ...............
TSA Aviation security (70 x 0550)  ...............  ...............  ...............          -1,500           -1,500           -1,500           -1,500
 (rescission)....................
H-65 (rescission)................         -10,000   ...............  ...............  ...............         +10,000   ...............  ...............
TSA research and development       ...............  ...............  ...............            -977             -977             -977             -977
 (rescission)....................
Treasury asset forfeiture fund     ...............  ...............        -100,000         -100,000         -100,000         -100,000   ...............
 (rescission)....................
Predisaster mitigation fund               -12,000   ...............  ...............  ...............         +12,000   ...............  ...............
 (rescission)....................
                                  ======================================================================================================================
      Total, title V, General            -202,620           18,000         -475,391          -83,478         +119,142         -101,478         +391,913
       Provisions................
          Appropriations.........        (104,379)         (60,000)        (-15,800)        (157,500)        (+53,121)        (+97,500)       (+173,300)
          Rescissions............       (-306,999)        (-42,000)       (-459,591)       (-240,978)        (+66,021)       (-198,978)       (+218,613)
                                  ======================================================================================================================
      Grand Total................      59,742,509       46,114,108       46,077,222       46,413,386      -13,329,123         +299,278         +336,164
          Appropriations.........     (41,323,600)     (40,529,722)     (40,910,427)     (40,800,978)       (-522,622)       (+271,256)       (-109,449)
          Rescissions............       (-306,999)        (-42,000)       (-459,591)       (-240,978)        (+66,021)       (-198,978)       (+218,613)
          Emergency                    (6,692,908)  ...............  ...............  ...............     (-6,692,908)  ...............  ...............
           appropriations........
          Overseas Contingency           (254,000)  ...............  ...............        (227,000)        (-27,000)       (+227,000)       (+227,000)
           Operations/Global War
           on Terrorism..........
      Disaster Relief Category...     (11,779,000)      (5,626,386)      (5,626,386)      (5,626,386)     (-6,152,614)  ...............  ...............
      (Fee Funded Programs)......      (4,792,962)      (5,569,976)      (5,569,976)      (5,574,976)       (+782,014)         (+5,000)         (+5,000)
      (By transfer)..............         (24,000)         (24,000)         (24,000)         (24,000)  ...............  ...............  ...............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


```