alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report for the period ending March 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of East Coast Diversified Corporation. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| February 13, 2012                                                                                                      |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                   |   |
| /s/ Kayode Aladesuyi                                                                                                   |   |
| Kayode AladesuyiChief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Financial Officer) |   |
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                             KOREA THRUNET CO., LTD

            LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       PERCENTAGE OF
                                                                       OWNERSHIP AND
                                          JURISDICTION OF           VOTING INTEREST HELD
             NAME                          INCORPORATION                 BY THRUNET
             ----                          -------------                 ----------
<S>                                       <C>                      <C>
Ginam Broadcasting Comm.                       Korea                      24.36%

Nowcom Co., Ltd.                               Korea                      34.22%

Korea.com Communications Co., Ltd.             Korea                      91.95%

TriGem Edunet, Inc.                            Korea                      27.59%

Multiplus Limited(1)                           Korea                          5%

ENS Securitization Limited(1)                  Korea                          -
</TABLE>

------------

     1    The operations of Multiplus and ENS Securitization were included in
          our consolidated financial statements in accordance with Statement of
          Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 140, "Accounting for
          Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
          Liabilities" due to the fact that each of the transactions with
          Multiplus and ENS Securitization, our special purpose entities, did
          not qualify as a true sale, thus the operations of the special purpose
          entities were consolidated under US GAAP. See "Item 5--Operating and
          Financial Review and Prospects--Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements".
Case No. 16,093.

#### UNITED STATES v. FIFTY-FOUR BARRELS OF DISTILLED SPIRITS.

[9 Int. Rev. Rec. 121.]

District Court, E. D. New York.

April, 1869.

Internal Revenue—Removal op Spirits—False Bonds—Mixture—Forfeiture.

In the ease of the United States against Fifty-Four Barrels of Distilled Spirits, tried *1075before BENEDICT, District.Judge, in the E. D. New York, the spirits were seized on a charge of having been removed on false bonds in June, 1867, from the bonded warehouse No. 72. Walker street to the rectifying establishment of William Krone, whence they were taken to New York and sold instead of being returned to the warehouse, as the bond required. This action was brought to condemn the property as forfeited for the use of the government. It was shown by the evidence that Krone had received for redistillation 200 barrels on fraudulent bonds and thirty-four barrels on which the tax had been paid; that the two lots were mixed, and that from this mixture the spirits in court were drawn off. Held, that the payment of the tax on all the spirits not having been proven, there being a mixture of fraudulent spirits with spirits that had paid the tax, the whole lot was legally forfeited to the use of the government, and directed a verdict accordingly.

J. J. Allen, Asst. Dist. Atty., for the government

T. B. Clarkson, for claimants.
EX 31-1

CERTIFICATION

I, Arthur Viola, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of INFe-Human
Resources, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information;

and

b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

July 14, 2005

/s/  ARTHUR VIOLA
________________________
Arthur Viola
Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director
#### ERASTUS CORNING, Respondent, *v.*JAMES T. WALKER, Appellant.

*Code of Civil Procedure, sec. .829*— a *party cannot examine Ms adversary as to transactions with a deceased person and thereby let in his own testimony.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.

The court, at General Term said: “ The defendant also claims that the referee erred in excluding the defendant from proving an agreement with the late Mr. Corning, deceased, as to his services, upon the ground that section 829 of the Code forbade it.

“As a part of the plaintiff’s claim was by assignment from the late Mr. Corning, the evidence was properly excluded. Neither was the evidence proper, because the plaintiff had testified, *1*I Enow there could have been no arrangement between defendant and late Erastus Corning as to payment for defendant’s services, from what Mr. Corning told me; and I have entire charge of his business.’ This evidence, assuming it relates to the same subject as that to which defendant sought to testify, was not given by plaintiff *‘*in his own behalf,’ as it should have been if it was proper for the defendant to contradict it. It was obtained by the defendant upon the cross-examination. A party cannot, 'by examining his adversary as to a transaction with a deceased, claim that such evidence is given by his adversary *‘*in his own behalf,’ and that therefore he may contradict him. That is not the meaning of the Code. It was testimony offered by the defendant himself, and ¡therefore he could not, by his personal testimony, contradict it.”

*Wood (St*Russell, for the appellant.

*Amasa J. Parker,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Westbrook, J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Bookes and Westbrook, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. PR06-19-002] 

Take notice that on December 20, 2006, Cypress Gas Pipeline, LLC filed a revised Statement of Operating Conditions in compliance with the Commission's letter order issued on December 6, 2006, in Docket Nos. PR06-19-000 and PR06-19-001. 

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Protest Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 23, 2007.                 

Magalie R. Salas, 

Secretary. 

 [FR Doc. E7-439 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Dru

Alco

an

HIV/A

A Consume

African A
What do drugs 

have to do with 

Drugs & 

Drug and alcohol use can lead 

increase your exposure to HIV/

or sharing drug materials, like n

your chances of becoming infe

What if I alrea

There are different types of 

you are already infected wit

using alcohol or other drugs 

infected with a different one

might be taking to treat one 

not be effective on another 

you could even infect your u

What if I can't 

drugs or alcoho

Don’t be afraid or ashamed to 

and Alcohol Treatment Hotline 

for help in getting treatment. I

toward recovery. 

If you decide to get drug or al

HIV treatment, let your curren

work with your drug or alcoho

sure the two types of treatme

Did you know? 

In 2004, African America

•	 49 percent of all peop

United States 

•	 50 percent of all estim

•	 Nearly two-thirds of a

tions among women 

Injection drug use is the 

infection for African Ame

leading cause of infectio

men. 

Source: Centers for Disease Con

HIV/A
African Americans 

about half of all n

in the United Sta

two-thirds of all ca

What if I can't 

this alone? 

Don’t worry, you don’t have to 

back of this brochure are hotl

help you locate a support gro

treatment you need, and even 

one. Call the toll-free number 

choice today. It could positive

There are people who really c

with you. 
’ 

’

You are not alo

Help is availab

Call These Toll-Free 

24-Hour Phone Numbe

Drug and Alcohol Trea

1-800-662-HELP (4357) 

National AIDS Hotline 

1-800-342-AIDS (2437) 

Homeless Assistance 

1-800-HUD (483)-1010 

Or Visit These Web Site

Substance Abuse Treatment 

www.findtreatment.sam

Office of Minority Health Re

Minority HIV/AIDS Initiative 

www.omhrc.gov 

Centers for Disease Contro

www.cdc.gov/hiv/dhap.

National Minority AIDS Cou

www.nmac.org 

Black Women's Health Netw

www.blackwomenshea

The Black Church HIV/AIDS 

www.balmingilead.org/

Or check the box below to 

center near you has listed 

phone number. 

The people who appear in this br

for illustrative purposes only. Do n

publication for a fee without spec

Office of Communications, Substa

Services Administration, U.S. Dep

Services. 

This brochure was created to acc

Substance Abuse Treatment for P

CSAT s Treatment Improvement P

series and its affiliated products a

SAMHSAs National Clearinghous

Information (NCADI). Call 1-800-7

1-800-487-4889 TDD (for the hea

www.csat.samhsa.gov. 

DHHS Publication No. [SMA] 07-

Printed 2007
#### In the Matter of William Leonard.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a rehearing before the Special Term. Opinion by Davis, P. J.
#### DeAngelo et al., Appellants, *v.*Philadelphia Transportation Company.

Argued November 21, 1968.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Beien and Robeets, JJ.

*Mark Charleston,*with him *Charleston é Post,*for appellant.

*Daniel I. Murphy,*for appellee.

January 15, 1969:

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

Judgment affirmed.
No. 59063.

protest 247443-K (New York).

#### Aero Sea Shipping Corporation *v.*United States,

*375Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the protest was overruled.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Seifi Ghasemi,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 10, 2007                |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |
| /s/ SEIFI GHASEMI                    |   |
| Seifi Ghasemi                        |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 orany other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald A. Mobley, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 203]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.), rendered September 2, 1994, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to his contention, the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137). The defendant’s attorney negotiated an advantageous plea agreement that substantially limited the defendant’s exposure to imprisonment *(see, People v Ladelokun,*192 AD2d 723; *People v Nicholls,*157 AD2d 1004).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.3



|KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





TERRA NETWORKS



Sociedad Anónima



Calle Nicaragua, No. 54

08029 Barcelona, Spain



---



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



---



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Terra Networks, S.A. on Form S-8 listed below of our report dated February 4, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Lycos Europe N.V., which is included in Terra Networks Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 26,
2003:



|333-73898 |  | Terra Networks 2001 Stock Option Plan                                                                                                
|--------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|333-12208 |  | Post-Effective Amendment to register ordinary shares from the Terra Networks 2000 Stock Option Plan previously registered on Form F-4



Madrid, Spain, June
26, 2003







|KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft  /s/ Stefan
Haas  Stefan Haas
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5066 

To require the approval of Congress for the President to impose duties 

on the importation of articles into the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the approval of Congress for the President to 

impose duties on the importation of articles into the 

United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Taxation Without 

5 Representation Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR IMPO7 SITION OF DUTIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 5 of title I of the Trade 

9 Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2191 et seq.) is amended by add10 ing at the end the following: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5066 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 155. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR IM2 POSITION OF DUTIES. 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—On and after the date of the en4 actment of this section, the President may impose a duty 

5 on the importation of articles into the United States under 

6 any provision of law, including a provision of law specified 

7 in subsection (b), only if— 

8 ‘‘(1) the President submits to Congress a pro9 posal to impose the duty that includes a rationale 

10 for imposing the duty; and 

11 ‘‘(2) there is enacted into law a joint resolution 

12 approving the imposition of the duty. 

13 ‘‘(b) PROVISIONS OF LAW SPECIFIED.—The provi14 sions of law specified in this subsection are the following: 

15 ‘‘(1) This Act. 

16 ‘‘(2) The Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1301 

17 et seq.). 

18 ‘‘(3) The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (19 

19 U.S.C. 1862 et seq.). 

20 ‘‘(4) The Trading with the Enemy Act (50 

21 U.S.C. 4301 et seq.). 

22 ‘‘(5) The International Emergency Economic 

23 Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). 

24 ‘‘(6) Any provision of law enacted to implement 

25 a trade agreement to which the United States is a 

26 party. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5066 IS

1 ‘‘(7) Any provision of a trade agreement to 

2 which the United States is a party. 

3 ‘‘(8) Any other provision of the customs and 

4 trade laws of the United States (as defined in sec5 tion 2 of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforce6 ment Act of 2015 (19 U.S.C. 4301)). 

7 ‘‘(c) TREATMENT OF EMBARGOES.—Subsection (a) 

8 does not apply to the exclusion of all articles, or all of 

9 a certain type of article, imported from a country from 

10 entering the United States.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

12 for the Trade Act of 1974 is amended by inserting after 

13 the item relating to section 154 the following: 

‘‘Sec. 155. Congressional approval required for imposition of duties.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Before the Third Division,

June 21, 1967

No. 60915.

#### Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 257297-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co,, Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.