Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 11 / Thursday, January 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 2177 

acquired during the 2005–06 crop year 

and continue in effect until all 2005–06 

reserve raisins are disposed of under the 

order. Accordingly, § 989.258 will 

appear in the Code of Federal 

Regulations. 

A small business guide on complying 

with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop 

marketing agreements and orders may 

be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ 

fv/moab.html. Any questions about the 

compliance guide should be sent to Jay 

Guerber at the previously mentioned 

address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

After consideration of all relevant 

material presented, including the 

Committee’s recommendation, and 

other information, it is found that 

finalizing the interim final rule, without 

change, as published in the Federal 

Register (71 FR 29567, May 23, 2006) 

will tend to effectuate the declared 

policy of the Act. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989 

Grapes, Marketing agreements, 

Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

PART 989—RAISINS PRODUCED 

FROM GRAPES GROWN IN 

CALIFORNIA 

■ Accordingly, the interim final rule 

amending 7 CFR part 989 which was 

published at 71 FR 29567 on May 23, 

2006, is adopted as a final rule without 

change. 

Dated: January 12, 2007. 

Lloyd C. Day, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–623 Filed 1–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2006–25584; Directorate 

Identifier 2000–NE–62–AD; Amendment 39–

14733; AD 2006–17–12] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce 

plc RB211 Series Turbofan Engines; 

Correction. 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This document makes 

corrections to Airworthiness Directive 

(AD) 2006–17–12. That AD applies to 

Rolls-Royce plc RB211 series turbofan 

engines. We published AD 2006–17–12 

in the Federal Register on August 23, 

2006 (71 FR 49339). An incorrect engine 

model number exists in the applicability 

paragraph and in the title of Table 5. 

Also, an incorrect serial number appears 

in Table 1. This document corrects these 

numbers. In all other respects, the 

original document remains the same. 

DATES: Effective Date: Effective January 

18, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian 

Dargin, Aerospace Engineer, Engine 

Certification Office, FAA, Engine and 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA, 01803; 

telephone (781) 238–7178; fax (781) 

238–7199. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A final 

rule AD, FR Doc. E6–13910, that applies 

to Rolls-Royce plc RB211 series turbofan 

engines was published in the Federal 

Register on August 23, 2006 (71 FR 

49339). The following corrections are 

needed: 

§ 39.13 [Corrected] 

■ On page 49340, in the third column, 

in applicability paragraph (c), in the 

fourth line, ‘‘RB211–535E4–C’’ is 

corrected to read ‘‘RB211–535E4–C–37’’. 

Also, on page 49341, in Table 1, in the 

fourth column, in the last line, 

‘‘WGQDY90005’’ is corrected to read 

‘‘WGQDY0005’’. Also, on page 49342, in 

the first column, in the Table 5 title, 

‘‘RB211–02’’ is corrected to read 

‘‘RB211–22B–02’’. 

Issued in Burlington, MA, on January 10, 

2007. 

Francis A. Favara, 

Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–497 Filed 1–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2007–26855; Directorate 

Identifier 2006–NM–264–AD; Amendment 

39–14888; AD 2007–02–01] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault 

Model F2000EX Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above. This AD results 

from mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) 

issued by an aviation authority of 

another country to identify and correct 

an unsafe condition on an aviation 

product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 

condition as incorrect monitoring of the 

fire detection system; therefore, its 

integrity is not guaranteed at all times. 

This AD requires actions that are 

intended to address the unsafe 

condition described in the MCAI. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

February 2, 2007. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain document listed in this AD 

as of February 2, 2007. 

We must receive comments on this 

AD by March 19, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• DOT Docket Web Site: Go to 

http://dms.dot.gov and follow the 

instructions for sending your comments 

electronically. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility, 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, 

Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–

0001. 

• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on 

the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 

400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 

DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

• Federal Rulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or in 

person at the Docket Management 

Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The AD docket contains this 

AD, the regulatory evaluation, any 

comments received, and other 

information. The street address for the 

Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–

5227) is in the ADDRESSES section. 

Comments will be available in the AD 

docket shortly after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom 

Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 

98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; 

fax (425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
2178 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 11 / Thursday, January 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

Streamlined Issuance of AD 

The FAA is implementing a new 

process for streamlining the issuance of 

ADs related to MCAI. This streamlined 

process will allow us to adopt MCAI 

safety requirements in a more efficient 

manner and will reduce safety risks to 

the public. This process continues to 

follow all FAA AD issuance processes to 

meet legal, economic, Administrative 

Procedure Act, and Federal Register 

requirements. We also continue to meet 

our technical decision-making 

responsibilities to identify and correct 

unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated 

products. 

This AD references the MCAI and 

related service information that we 

considered in forming the engineering 

basis to correct the unsafe condition. 

The AD contains text copied from the 

MCAI and for this reason might not 

follow our plain language principles. 

Discussion 

The European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA), which is the Technical Agent 

for the member states of the European 

Community, has issued Emergency 

Airworthiness Directive 2006–0356–E, 

dated November 30, 2006 (referred to 

after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an 

unsafe condition for the specified 

products. The MCAI states that 

troubleshooting of a ‘‘ENG 1 FIRE 

DETECT FAIL’’ CAS (crew alerting 

system) message that occurred on an inservice aircraft revealed that the 

detector threshold tolerances could not 

identify a single failure of one engine 

fire detector loop out of the two present 

on each engine. The fire detection 

system is therefore not correctly 

monitored, and its integrity is not 

guaranteed at all times. The goal of the 

MCAI is to verify the fire detection 

system integrity by mandating a onetime inspection and, in case of findings, 

to replace the faulty detector pending 

further modification of the monitoring 

system. The MCAI will be revised/ 

superseded once the terminating 

corrective action for the monitoring 

function has been approved. You may 

obtain further information by examining 

the MCAI in the AD docket. 

Relevant Service Information 

Dassault has issued Service Bulletin 

F2000EX–137, Revision 1, dated 

December 7, 2006. The actions 

described in this service information are 

intended to correct the unsafe condition 

identified in the MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with this State of 

Design Authority, they have notified us 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are issuing this 

AD because we evaluated all the 

information provided by the State of 

Design Authority and determined the 

unsafe condition exists and is likely to 

exist or develop on other products of the 

same type design. 

Differences Between the AD and the 

MCAI or Service Information 

We have reviewed the MCAI and 

related service information and, in 

general, agree with their substance. But 

we might have found it necessary to use 

different words from those in the MCAI 

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 

operators and is enforceable. In making 

these changes, we do not intend to differ 

substantively from the information 

provided in the MCAI and related 

service information. 

We might also have required different 

actions in this AD from those in the 

MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. 

Any such differences are described in a 

separate paragraph of the AD. These 

requirements take precedence over the 

actions copied from the MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination of the Effective 

Date 

An unsafe condition exists that 

requires the immediate adoption of this 

AD. The FAA has found that the risk to 

the flying public justifies waiving notice 

and comment prior to adoption of this 

rule because incorrect fire detector 

threshold tolerance could lead to 

undetected failure of the fire detectors. 

Therefore, we determined that notice 

and opportunity for public comment 

before issuing this AD are impracticable 

and that good cause exists for making 

this amendment effective in fewer than 

30 days. 

Comments Invited 

This AD is a final rule that involves 

requirements affecting flight safety, and 

we did not precede it by notice and 

opportunity for public comment. We 

invite you to send any written relevant 

data, views, or arguments about this AD. 

Send your comments to an address 

listed under the ADDRESSES section. 

Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2007–26855; 

Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–264–

AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. 

We specifically invite comments on the 

overall regulatory, economic, 

environmental, and energy aspects of 

this AD. We will consider all comments 

received by the closing date and may 

amend this AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

dms.dot.gov, including any personal 

information you provide. We will also 

post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this AD. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this AD would 

not have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD would 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national Government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 11 / Thursday, January 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 2179 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

2007–02–01 Dassault Aviation: 

Amendment 39–14888. Docket No. 

FAA–2007–26855; Directorate Identifier 

2006–NM–264–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) 

becomes effective February 2, 2007. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model 

Falcon 2000EX airplanes; s/n (serial number) 

06, s/n 28 through 90, s/n 93, and s/n 95; 

certificated in any category. 

Reason 

(d) The MCAI states that troubleshooting of 

a ‘‘ENG 1 FIRE DETECT FAIL’’ CAS (crew 

alerting system) message that occurred on an 

in-service aircraft revealed that the detector 

threshold tolerances could not identify a 

single failure of one engine fire detector loop 

out of the two present on each engine. The 

fire detection system is therefore not 

correctly monitored, and its integrity is not 

guaranteed at all times. The goal of the MCAI 

is to verify the fire detection system integrity 

by mandating a one-time inspection and, in 

case of findings, to replace the faulty detector 

pending further modification of the 

monitoring system. The MCAI will be 

revised/superseded once the terminating 

corrective action for the monitoring function 

has been approved. 

Actions and Compliance 

(e) Unless already done, do the following 

actions. Within 35 days after the effective 

date of this AD, perform an engine fire 

detection integrity check as required by 

paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2), and (e)(3) of this AD 

in accordance with Dassault Service Bulletin 

F2000EX–137, Revision 1, dated December 7, 

2006. 

(1) First, in the baggage compartment, on 

each mobile connector of the monitoring 

units (L320WG) and (R320WG), the 

equivalent resistance of the two engine 

detectors at the LH (left-hand) and the RH 

(right-hand) sides must be verified. 

According to findings, the corresponding 

system is either considered correct or 

incorrect. 

(2) As a second step, if either one or both 

the LH and the RH system is (are) found to 

be incorrect, it is required to check the actual 

resistance of both detectors of the incorrect 

system(s) on the affected engine(s). 

(3) Any faulty detector must be replaced 

prior to further flight. 

(4) Actions done before the effective date 

of this AD in accordance with Dassault 

Service Bulletin F2000EX–137, dated 

November 23, 2006, are acceptable for 

compliance with the requirements of 

paragraph (e) of this AD. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(f) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 

98057–3356, has the authority to approve 

AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 

the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 

has approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(g) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency (EASA) Emergency 

Airworthiness Directive 2006–0356–E, dated 

November 30, 2006; and Dassault Service 

Bulletin F2000EX–137, dated November 23, 

2006; or Revision 1, dated December 7, 2006; 

for related information. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(h) You must use Dassault Service Bulletin 

F2000EX–137, Revision 1, dated December 7, 

2006, to do the actions required by this AD, 

unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

this service information under 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 

2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey 07606. 

(3) You may review copies at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http:// 

www.archives.gov/federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 

5, 2007. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–490 Filed 1–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2006–25947; Airspace 

Docket No. 06–AAL–31] 

Revision of Class D/E Airspace; Big 

Delta, Allen Army Airfield, Fort Greely, 

AK 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action revises Class D 

and E airspace at Allen Army Airfield 

(AAF), AK. The United States Army has 

decided to staff the Allen AAF air traffic 

control tower (ATCT) part time. The 

Class D and E airspace is being revised 

in order to align Class D airspace 

effective times to match ATCT hours of 

operation. The current title of the 

airspace described in FAA Order 

7400.9P is also changing to reflect 

current guidance in FAA Order 7400.2E. 

This rule results in the revision of Class 

D and E airspace at Allen AAF, Delta 

Junction, AK. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, March 

15, 2007. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under title 1, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to 

the annual revision of FAA Order 

7400.9 and publication of conforming 

amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary 

Rolf, AAL–538G, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, 

Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513–7587; 

telephone number (907) 271–5898; fax: 

(907) 271–2850; e-mail: 

gary.ctr.rolf@faa.gov. Internet address: 

http://www.alaska.faa.gov/at. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On Tuesday, October 31, 2006, the 

FAA proposed to amend part 71 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 

part 71) to revise Class D and E airspace 

at Allen AAF, AK (71 FR 63725). The 

action was proposed in order to align 

the Class D and E airspace with Allen 

AAF tower’s operating hours. The Army 

does not need to operate the control 

tower 24 hours per day. Class D airspace 

is only in effect when a tower is open. 

When the tower is not open, the 

airspace reverts to Class E. Additionally, 

the title of each airspace description in 

FAA Order 7400.9P associated with 

Allen AAF is being updated. In this 

case, the town of Delta Junction (which 

is closer to Allen AAF) is now 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES