alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(LOGO) NORWEST

Norwest Home Improvement, Inc.
500 Riverhills Business Park
Suite 590
Birmingham, Alabama 35242
205/991-9550

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
l1000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:

(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
    preceding  fiscal  year under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
    Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and
    to the best of these Officers' knowledge,  the Servicer has fulfilled all of
    its  duties,   responsibilities   or  obligations   under  these  Agreements
    throughout  such  year,  or if there has been a default  or  failure  of the
    servicer to perform any of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a
    description of each default or failure and the nature and status thereof has
    been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
    servicer in good standing;

(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
    Policy  and any  other  bonds  required  under  the  terms of the  Servicing
    Agreement,   Trust  Agreement,   Pooling  and  Servicing   Agreement  and/or
    Seller/Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
    applicable) and Primary  Mortgage  Insurance  Policy (if  applicable),  with
    respect  to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have  been  paid  and  that all such
    insurance policies are in full force and effect;

(E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
    accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on
    any  Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid,  or if any such costs or expenses
    have not been paid with respect to any  Mortgaged  Property,  the reason for
    the non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment of  Mortgage Property
    required per section 6050H,  6050J,  and 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code,
    respectively, have been prepared and filed.


Certified By:

Officer

Vice President
Title

May 23, 2000
Date
No. 55276.

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 144929-K/1892, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Commonwealth *v.*Montgomery, Appellant.

Submitted September 30, 1968.

Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.

*601
      *Michael J. Wherry,*Public Defender, for appellant.

*Robert F. Banks,*Assistant District Attorney, and *Edward M. Bell,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

January 15, 1969:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed.

Mr. Justice Musmanno did not participate in the decision of this case.
EX-10.1(e)



 Exhibit 10.1(e) 

June 1, 2014 
 AAA Capital Management Advisors, Ltd. 

1300 Post Oak Blvd. #350 
 Houston, Texas 77056 

Attention: Mr. Anthony Annunziato 
 Re:
Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Annunziato: 
 We
are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2015 and all
other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 
  

	 	•	 	AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P. II 

  

	 	•	 	AAA Master Fund LLC 

  

	 	•	 	Orion Futures Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Global Futures Fund LTD. 

  

	 	•	 	AAA ARC Feeder Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	MSMF Custom Solutions Fund L.P. 

 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mrs. Alice Lonero at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1304. 

Very truly yours, 
 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC 

 

			
		
	By:		/s/ Alice Lonero
			 Alice Lonero
 Chief Financial
Officer


  

			
	
	AAA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORS, LTD.
		
	By:		/s/ Anthony Annunziato
	 Print Name:
		Anthony A. Annunziato
	 AL/sr
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES EDWARD WASHINGTON, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Peter Murray*and *Mr. Bolert 0. Beclc*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Joseph P. Lordi*and *Mr. James B. Zazzali*for the respondent.

February 27, 1968.

Denied.
No. 56495.

protest 158617-K (Cleveland).

#### Mussman *&*Shafer, Inc. *v.*United States,

*431Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pulpboard the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Mussman & Shafer, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 28, C. D. 1343), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

June 21, 1957

No. 60904.

#### Cohen & Mann *v.*United States,

protest 307150-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists wholly or in chief value of a product of which synthetic resin is the chief binding agent, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Charles A. Lull v. Daniel Curry and others.

Where a highway is laid out through the lands of an individual, and his damages are appraised, and an order «on the township treasurer is tendered for the amount, the order must designate the payee, so as to show on its face the person to whom it is payable.

An order payable “to tbe owner or occupant, or to the person entitled thereto, for the land so taken,” is not a compliance with the statute, and its tender does not authorize the highway commissioners to take possession of the land

*Heard July*1*9th.*

*Decided July*21st.

Case made after judgment from Saginaw Circuit.

*Sutherland db*Miller, for defendants.

*Moore &*Gaylord, for plaintiff.

Campbell J.:

Plaintiff having sued defendants for trespass, they justified on the ground that the place where it was committed was a highway which they were opening according to law. The Judge found the facts, from which it appeared that regular proceedings were had to lay out the road and assess the damages on the jfiaintiff’s land, but that no payment of the amount was made to him, and no tender except of an order on the township treasurer payable “ *to the owner or*occupant, *or to the person entitled*thereto, *for the land so taken;"*which be declined to receive.*

*398The statute allows the road to be opened when the damages have been paid or tendered, or “ *an order on the treasivrer of the proper township for the amount of such damages shall have been executed and delivered, or tendered to such owner or occupant by said commissioners.*— Laws 1858, *p.*37, § 25.

Such an order as was actually tendered is in no sense a compliance with the law. It designates no payee, and leaves the holder with no means of assuring the treasurer of his rights under it. It is payable to no particular person, and' gives no means of reasonably ascertaining the payee. An order under the statute must show on its face to whom it belongs, or is payable.

As under this finding no judgment could possibly be given for the defendants under any rule which might be adopted upon the other points mooted, we do not now feel authorized to consider them.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

*

The following is a copy of tho order, omitting the description of the road :

,l Bridgeport, August; 18th, 1860,

To the Treasurer o? the township of BridgeportWhereas a public highway has *398been laid out by the proper officers, through lands now occupied by Charles- A. Lull; said road described as follows” (giving description according to survey): “The amount of damages awarded to the person entitled thereto, $25 per acre for whatever 1 md was taken at that rate, which for the land so taken amounts to $48.62%. Pay to the owner or occupant, or to the person entitled thereto, for the land so taken, the sum above named, out of any funds raised by the township for the laying out and establishing of roads in said township.

*Freeman*Little, V Highway Commissioners *Haniel*Qurry, V for the *Jesse Irish,*) township of Bridgeport.” */Egbert Bldred,*Town Clerk,
No. 38898.

#### Protests 842392-G, etc., of Damascus Trading Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the records presented the protests were overruled.
No. 46785.

#### Protests 71371-K, etc., of Q. W. Lung Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the merchandise consists of crude drugs the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Oy Wo Tong*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was sustained; and drugs sliced, the same as those the subject of *Oy Wo Tong*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as claimed.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-1121 

________________________________________________________________________ 

POLLUTION 

Control of Harmful Anti-Fouling 

Systems on Ships, 2001 

 Convention Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and OTHER GOVERNMENTS 

Done at London October 5, 2001 

 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 MULTILATERAL 

 Pollution: Control of Harmful Anti-Fouling 

 Systems on Ships, 2001 

 Convention on the control of harmful anti-fouling systems on ships, 2001; 

 Done at London October 5, 2001; 

 Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate January 22, 2008 (Treaty Doc. 110-13, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

 Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-19, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

 Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate September 26, 2008; 

 Ratified by the President August 3, 2012; 

 Ratification of the United States of America deposited August 21, 2012; 

 Entered into force November 21, 2012.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MedAssets, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ John A. Bardis 
John A. Bardis
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D2 023
- 3029 LT Case No. 2022
- CF
- 010788

_____________________________ M INAS K

ARAN GOLIAN , Appella nt,
v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee
.

_____________________________ On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Jeb T. Branham, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Def ender, and Na talie R. Gossett, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Bea ch, for Appellant. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, and A manda A. Uwaibi, Assistan t Attorney General, Tallahassee, for App ellee. J une 11, 2024 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . L AMBERT , H ARRIS , and K ILBANE , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD A. LYNCH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued March 5, 1968

Decided April 1, 1968.

*Mr. Joseph F. Mattice*argued the cause for appellant.

*Mr. Thomas L. Yaccarino,*Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent *(Mr. Vincent P. Keuper,*Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Curiam.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for murder in the second degree. We find no basis for disturbing the judgment. It is affirmed.

*For affirmance*— Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—7.

*For reversal*— None.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5005 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5005

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize additional funding for the San Joaquin River Restoration 
                            Settlement Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RESTORATION 
              SETTLEMENT ACT.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations To Implement Settlement.--
Section 10009 of the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act 
(Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1355) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``$250,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$750,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``$250,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$750,000,000''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations for Friant Division 
Improvements.--Section 10203(c) of the Omnibus Public Land Management 
Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1367) is amended by striking 
``$50,000,000'' and inserting ``$75,000,000''.

            Passed the Senate December 17 (legislative day, December 
      16), 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 5005

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize additional funding for the San Joaquin River Restoration 
                            Settlement Act.
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00219-CR

GRADY GENE VAUGHN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 415th District 

Court

of Parker County (CR16-0367)

January 30, 2020

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
No. 53588.

protests 134965-K, etc. (New York).

#### Geigy Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH C. WEAVER, et al., No. CIV.S-04-2678 MCE DAD 

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER

EL DORADO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

This matter came before the court on May 13, 2005, for

hearing on defendants’ motion to compel answers to interrogatories

and a response to their request for production of documents. Mark A.

Miller appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. Franklin G. Gumpert

appeared on behalf of defendants.

Having considered all written materials submitted in

connection with the motion, and after hearing oral argument, for the

reasons set forth on the record during the hearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that defendants’ motion to compel is granted. Defendants

Case 2:04-cv-02678-MCE -DAD Document 13 Filed 05/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

also are awarded reasonable expenses incurred in bring their motion

in the amount of $752.50 to be paid by plaintiffs’ counsel forthwith.

DATED: May 13, 2005.

DAD:th

ddad1\orders.civil\weaver2678.oah

Case 2:04-cv-02678-MCE -DAD Document 13 Filed 05/13/05 Page 2 of 2
Order entered July 31, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00090
- CR DAVID BRIAN NEFF, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judi cial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401
- 82288
- 2018



### O RDER Appellant’s brief was due June 22, 2019. When it was not filed, we notified appellant by postcard dated June 26, 2019, and directed him to file his brief along with a pr oper motion to extend time by July 8 , 2019. We cautioned appellant that the failure to do so would result in the appeal being abated for a hearing under rule 38.8(b)(3)

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(b)(3). To date, no brief has been filed, and we have had n o communication regarding this appeal. Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whethe r appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeal.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing,the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d

708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effe ctive representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We D IRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Mark Rusch, Presiding Judge, 401st Judicial District Court; Stephanie Hudson; and to the Collin County District Attorney’s Office. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with t he above order. The appeal shall be reinstated twenty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
(Reap. Dec. 10456)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 7607.

(Decided February 27, 1963)

*Brooks & Brooks*for tbe plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the bicycle tires, tubes, and rimtapes, imported from Holland, here involved, and that such values were the invoiced unit prices, as entered.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
#### Zeb Smithson, *et al.,*v. Alfred H. Deely, *et al.*

179 So. 759.

Division B.

Opinion Filed March 11, 1938.

*Jas. B. Gibson, Jr.,*for Appellants;

*Dayton, Dayton & Dayton,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

above entitled cause having been submitted upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court after due consideration is *777of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the order appealed from should be affirmed upon the authority of Section 26 of the 1931 Chancery Act and the following cases: Whitaker v. Wright, 100 Fla. 282, 129 So. 889; Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp., *et al.,*98 Fla. 946, 124 So. 719; Barry v. Walker, *et al.,*103 Fla. 533, 137 So. 711.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Before the Third Division,

May 28, 1947

No. 51751.

#### Protests 991064-G, etc., of Sun Kwong On et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 10432 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Lucas Tapia -**  **Zaragoza,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22 - CR - 315 - 1

**________________ ______________**  Before **Jones, Southwick,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Lucas Tapia - Zaragoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tapia - Zaragoza has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and th e relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as

**_________________ ____**  * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10432 Document: 00517009448 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2023No. 23 - 10432

2 well as Tapia - Zaragoza ’s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSE D**  . See **5th Cir. R .**  42.2. To the extent that Tapia Zaragoza ’s response can be construed as requesting the appointment of new counsel , the request is **DENIED** as untimely. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902 - 03 (5th Cir. 1998) . Case: 23-10432 Document: 00517009448 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2023