alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Annual Report of NDS Group plc on Form 10-K for the fiscal
      year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned officers of NDS Group
      plc, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of NDS Group plc.





September
      1, 2006





By:/s/
              Abraham PeledAbraham PeledChairman and Chief Executive
              Officer







By:/s/
              Alexander GershAlexander GershChief Financial
              Officer







E-7
#### A. VICTOR KOCH, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WALTER D. FLOERSHEINER, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

*Mr. Robert W. MacQuesten*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Martin J. Kolce*and *Mr. Leslie M. Seller*for the respondents.

April 3, 1962.
010-8080-3687/1/AMERICAS

May 12, 2015
VIA EMAIL Mr. Robert Finamore Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590
Re: Polynesian Limited—Request for Thirty-Day Extension of Cabotage Operations, Docket DOT-OST-2014-0144
Dear Mr. Finamore: In accordance with the Department of Transportation’s Notice of Action Taken issued February 26, 2015, in the captioned docket, I am writing on behalf of Polynesian Limited (“Polynesian”) to request approval of an additional thirty days of cabotage operations between Pago Pago and the Manu’a Islands, American Samoa. Polynesian requests approval of cabotage operations through June 30, 2015. The circumstances described in Polynesian’s application have not changed and Polynesian’s application continues to meet the requirements of 49 USC 40109(g) for grant of an emergency cabotage exemption. The Pago Pago-Manu’a Islands route remains without U.S. carrier service. Polynesian is the only air carrier able to provide much needed transportation between the two points, thus preventing severe hardship to American Samoa residents. During the past several months Polynesian has performed medical evacuations from the Manu’a Islands and also transported a large number of passengers between Pago Pago and the Manu’a Islands, including government employees and engineers. There is a clear need for continued service for an additional thirty days. Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP 2550 M Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20037 charles.donley@squirepb.com +1.202.626.6840Mr. Robert Finamore

May 12, 2015 Page 2

010-8080-3687/1/AMERICAS Please contact the undersigned with any questions. Very truly yours,

Charles F. Donley II cc: Office of the Governor Executive Office Building, Third Floor, Utulei Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799 Fax: 011 684-633-2269 perkmann@cooley.com alex.sene.jr@gmail.com steve.morrissey@united.com ; dan.weiss@united.com pdoell@naca.cc
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4780 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the number of days 

of paid leave provided for certain military service by Federal employees, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 25, 2024 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the number of days of paid leave provided for certain military 

service by Federal employees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Employees 

5 in the Guard and Reserve Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4780 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DAYS OF PAID LEAVE PROVIDED FOR 

2 CERTAIN MILITARY SERVICE BY FEDERAL 

3 EMPLOYEES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6323(a)(1) of title 5, 

5 United States Code, is amended by striking the second 

6 sentence and inserting the following: ‘‘Leave under this 

7 subsection accrues for an employee or individual at the 

8 rate of 40 days per fiscal year and, to the extent that it 

9 is not used in a fiscal year, accumulates for use in suc10 ceeding fiscal years until it totals not more than 20 days 

11 at the beginning of any fiscal year.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2025. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# FILED APR 2 6 2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
No. 69869 FARMERS AGAINST CURTAILMENT I ORDER, LLC, Appellant,

vs. JASON KING, P.E., NEVADA STATE ENGINEER; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES, Respondents.



### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Cause appearing, appellant's motion for a voluntary dismissal of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN BY: 

# act ii

cc: Hon. Leon Aberasturi, District Judge Taggart & Taggart, Ltd. Attorney General/Carson City Third District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER 

# (Jo 

# - [363g-
6870

#### HUBBARD v. FURMAN UNIVERSITY.

Serving Amending Pleading. — An order allowing amendments to a complaint in twenty days is complied with in case of appeal from the order by serving amended complaint within twenty days after filing remittitur below.

Before Gage, J., Greenville, May,' 1907.

Reversed.

Action by Louis M. Hubbard against Furman! University and E. C. James. From circuit order setting aside service of amended complaint, plaintiff appeals.

*Mr. D. Lewis Dorroh,*for appellant,

cites: 61 S. C., 555; 17 S. C., 218; 54 S. C., 223.

*Messrs. B. M. Shuman*and *Haynesworth &*Patterson, contra,

cite: 3 S. C., 606; 20 S. C., 153; 28 S. C., 449; 26 S'. C., 474; Code of Proc., 194; 21 S. C., 221, 226; 24 S. C., 165; 57 S. C., 235.

April 16, 1908.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The Circuit Court, in sustaining a demurrer to the original complaint on the ground that it did not contain a statement of facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, gave the plaintiff leave to amend his complaint within twenty days. The plaintiff appealed from' the order and this Court, in general terms, affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court. The remittitur was filed' in the Circuit Court on 22nd April, 1907, and within twenty days thereafter, on the 29 th April, 1907, the plaintiff filed his amended complaint, claiming to be within the time allowed him to amend. The Circuit Court held otherwise, and on motion of the defendant, dismissed the complaint.

We think the case is controlled by *Barnwell*v. Marion, 54 S. C., 223, 32 S. E., 313. In that case the demurrer was *64overruled with leave to the defendant to answer in twenty-days. On appeal, the judgment of the Circuit Court was affirmed. The point was then made that the defendant’s time to answer was to be counted from the date of the order of the Circuit Court, and that time expired pending the appeal, an answer tendered within twenty days after the remittitur from the Supreme Court had been filed in the Circuit Court, was too late. This Court held the period of twenty days was to be counted from the time the remittitur was filed.

When this case was here before the question was not made that the order then appealed from was not appealable, and it is not necessary now to decide it.

The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed.
# Section 333 Amendment
Trumbull Unmanned, LLC Prepared by: Dyan Gibbens, LLC June 10 , 2015

Page of 1 2 TRUMBULL UNMANNEDRequest for Amendment to FAA Exemption No. 11146 Docket No. FAA-2014-0890 10 June 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington DC 20590 Re: Amendment ot Trumbull Unmanned Exemption No. 11146 Dear Sir or Ma’am, Trumbull Unmanned respectfully requests amendment to our FAA Exemption No. 11146, Docket No. FAA-2014-0890. We request for the additional UAS listed below to be added to our exemption for continued safe operation:

• Altavian F6500

• Altavian R8400

• sensefly eXom

• Aibotix X6 The confidential operations manual will be sent via email. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Should you have any questions, please contact us. Respectfully, Dyan Gibbens CEO Trumbull Unmanned Cc: Rob Pappas Jake Troutman

Page of 2 2 TRUMBULL UNMANNED
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Thomas J. Hutchison III, Chief
Executive Officer, certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition of the Company as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.



|                   |  |                               
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|Date: May 27, 2004 |  | /s/ Thomas J. Hutchison III   
|                   |  | Name: Thomas J. Hutchison III 
|                   |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.7


 


同意函


Spousal Consent


 


本人,汲泉(身份证号码:340321197801221814),为李其梅(身份证号码:340302197406121427)之合法配偶。本人在此无条件并不可撤销地同意李其梅于2015年2月11日签署下列文件(下称“交易文件”),并同意按照以下文件的规定处置李其梅持有的、并登记在其名下的安徽人人家太阳能有限公司(“安徽人人家”)的股权:


The undersigned, Ji
Quan (ID card No. 340321197801221814), is the lawful spouse of Li Qimei (ID card No. 340302197406121427). I hereby unconditionally
and irrevocably agree to the execution of the following documents (hereinafter referred to as the “Transaction Documents”)
by Li Qimei on February 11, 2015, and the disposal of the equity interests of Anhui Renrenjia Solar Co., Ltd. (“Anhui
Renrenjia”) held by Li Qimei and registered in his name according to the following documents:


 


		(1)	与安徽致佳基石电子科技有限公司(下称“独资公司”)及安徽人人家签署的《股权质押协议》;



Equity Interest Pledge Agreement entered
into between Anhui Zhijia Cornerstone Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “WFOE”)
and Anhui Renrenjia;


 


		(2)	与独资公司及安徽人人家签署的《独家购买权合同》;



Exclusive Option Agreement entered
into between the WFOE and Anhui Renrenjia;


 


		(3)	李其梅签署的《授权委托书》;



Power of Attorney executed by Li Qimei;


 


本人承诺不就李其梅持有的安徽人人家的股权提出任何主张。本人进一步确认,李其梅履行交易文件以及进一步修改或终止交易文件并不需要本人另行授权或同意。


I hereby undertake not to
make any assertions in connection with the equity interests of Anhui Renrenjia which are held by Li Qimei. I hereby further confirm
that Li Qimei can perform the Transaction Documents and further amend or terminate the Transaction Documents absent authorization
or consent from me.


 


本人承诺将签署一切必要的文件,并采取一切必要的行动,以确保(经不时修订的)交易文件得到适当履行。


I hereby undertake to execute
all necessary documents and take all necessary actions to ensure appropriate performance of the Transaction Documents (as amended
form time to time).


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


本人同意并承诺,如本人由于任何原因获得李其梅持有的安徽人人家的任何股权,则本人应受(经不时修订的)交易文件以及独资公司和安徽人人家之间于2015年2月11日签署的《独家业务合作协议》(下称“独家业务合作协议”)的约束,并遵守作为安徽人人家的股东在(经不时修订的)交易文件和独家业务合作协议下的义务,且为此目的,一旦独资公司提出要求,本人应签署格式和内容基本与(经不时修订的)交易文件和独家业务合作协议相同的一系列书面文件。


I hereby agree and undertake
that if I obtain any equity interests of Anhui Renrenjia which are held by Li Qimei for any reasons, I shall be bound by the Transaction
Documents and the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement entered into between the WFOE and Anhui Renrenjia as of February 11,
2015 (“Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement”) (as amended from time to time) and comply with the obligations
thereunder as a shareholder of Anhui Renrenjia. For this purpose, upon the WFOE’s request, I shall sign a series of written
documents in substantially the same format and content as the Transaction Documents and Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement
(as amended from time to time).


 


 





	 	 
	 	 




 


日期:       2015年2月11日  


 Date: February 11, 2015
No. 51763.

#### Protests 86877-K, etc., of Kwong Yuen Shing et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |                        
|------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date:        |  |                        
|May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ John P. Manning    
|             |  |                        
|             |  | John P. Manning        
|             |  | Chief Executive Officer
|             |  |                        
|             |  |                        



*  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4384 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4384

  To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 to provide for 
environmental infrastructure in Columbus, Henry, and Clayton Counties, 
                                Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2024

  Mr. Ossoff introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 to provide for 
environmental infrastructure in Columbus, Henry, and Clayton Counties, 
                                Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Georgia Stormwater Management Act''.

SEC. 2. COLUMBUS, HENRY, AND CLAYTON COUNTIES, GEORGIA.

    Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3808) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
            ``(406) Columbus, henry, and clayton counties, georgia.--
        $10,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water 
        and wastewater infrastructure (including stormwater 
        management), Columbus, Henry, and Clayton Counties, Georgia.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 60903.

#### J. B. Wood Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 290801-K (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-09-0426

SAT Date: 7/10/2009

Print Date: 3/17/2010

Related cases: CBI: Yes

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

 1 2 1

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal, inhalation

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-E,S,MM,L; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-09-0426

FATE: Estimations for low weight, 

Liquid with MP = 15 EC (M)

log Kow = 5.46 (E); 

S = 3.43 mg/L at 25 EC (E)

VP = 7.2E-4 torr at 25 EC (NOMO5)

BP = 274-296 EC (M)

H = 1.70E-4 (E)

log Koc = 2.89 (E)

log Fish BCF = 3.27 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.71 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption, stripping and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate
Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 7 hrs

Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 8 da

Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 5.2 hr via OH radical

PBT Potential: P1B2

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate

 Health:

 Health Summary: Expect poor absorption via all routes (pchem). Concern 

for irritation to all tissues (MSDS).

 Ecotox:

Test 

Organism

Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 0.22

fish _ chronic value 0.013

daphnid _ chronic value 0.019

algal _ chronic value 0.15

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; 

SAR chemical class = alcohol; log Kow = 5.68 (EPI); MW 214; pH7; effective concentrations 

based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as 

CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs neutral organic chemicals

SAR Class alcohol

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Montero, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 405]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered March 16, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that the Supreme Court erred by not charging the jury with regard to circumstantial evidence *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hall,*181 AD2d 791) and, in any event, his claim is without merit. Thompson, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



CERTIFICATIONS

I, Allan Weiss, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elderwatch, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuers internal control over financial reporting.



5. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditor and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



By/s/ Allan Weiss

Allan Weiss

President, Chief Executive Officer



Date:  May 12, 2006