alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX. 4.31 Amendment - Look






AMENDING AGREEMENT NO. 2
THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT made effective as of the 12th day of March, 2015.
BETWEEN:
ONCOYLYTICS BIOTECH INC.,
("ONCOLYTICS")
- and -
KIRK LOOK,
(the "Employee")
WHEREAS the Employee is an officer of Oncolytics whose terms of employment are set forth in the Executive Employment Agreement ("Employment Agreement") dated effective January 1, 2013;
AND WHEREAS Oncolytics and the Employee wish to amend the Employment Agreement;
NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amending Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows:
Section 1 – Amendments


The Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing Section 3(1) with the following:


“Commencing January 1, 2015, Oncolytics shall pay to the Employee a salary of  THREE HUNDRED NINETEEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED ($319,200.00) DOLLARS CANADIAN per annum, exclusive of bonuses, benefits and other compensation, payable in equal installments of THIRTEEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED  ($13,300.00) DOLLARS CANADIAN on the 15th and last day of each month.”


   


Section 2 – Effective Date


(1)    This Amending Agreement shall be effective from and after January 1, 2015.


(2)    In all other respects the parties confirm that the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.
	
				
	 
	 
	ONCOLYTICS BIOTECH INC.



	Per:
	/s/ Brad Thompson

	 
	 
	 
	Brad Thompson, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 
	Per:
	/s/ Matthew Coffey

	 
	 
	 
	Matthew Coffey, Ph.D.
Chief Operating Officer






	
			
	/s/ Margaret Kowalczewski
	 
	

/s/ Kirk Look

	WITNESS
	 
	KIRK LOOK
No. 50105.

#### Protests 962566-G, etc., of N. Minami & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Before the First Division,

May 3, 1961

No. 65558.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/10640 and 60/4494 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the item described on entry 34090, protest 60/10640, as “Chenille figures” and the item described on entry 17738, protest 60/4494, as “Nylon doll w/pin” are manufactures of synthetic textile, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 47429.

#### Petitions 6147-R, etc., of Toa Kigyo Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared in this case that duringvfchis’period there,had been a change of prices in Japan and there was a disagreement between the importer and the appraiser as to the value for duty purposes. After considerable negotiation it was agreed that certain cases be selected as test cases and advances were made thereon by the appraiser. On appeal to this court it was held that neither the values contended for by the importer nor the appraiser were correct, the court finding the proper value of the fish to be 3 percent lower than that returned by the appraiser, but higher than the entered value. No appeal was taken from the judgment of the trial court. From the record the court was of the opinion that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petitions were therefore granted.
EX 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Arthur Viola, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of INFe-Human Resources,
Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other fi-nancial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

October 14, 2005

/s/  ARTHUR VIOLA
________________________
Arthur Viola
Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director
(Reap. Dec. 9175)

#### F. W. Myers & Co. Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. A-6288, etc.

(Decided June 25, 1958)

Barnes, *Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Richardson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise and the issues in the reappraisement appeals enumerated in Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are the same in all material respects as in *F. W. Myers & Co. Inc.*v. *United States,*38 Cust. Ct. 569, Reap. Dec. 8729, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the prices at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the entered values, and that there was no higher export value for such or similar merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that these cases may be submitted upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in 19 U. S. C. section 1402 (c) (§ 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930), to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is the entered value.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
~D sr~ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

## f

~ REGION IX

~

_____ 75 Hawthorne Street 

# \~ ~/ San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

## APR 20 2016 Mr. Kenneth Joe Frazier, Plant Manager Salt River Project Navajo Generating Station P.O. Box 850 Page, Arizona 86040 Re: Final Permit Decision for Navajo Generating Station RCTS Project MinorNSR PermitT-0004-NN Dear Mr. Frazier: In accordancewith the Clean AirAct (CAA), as amended (42 U.S.C 7401 et seq.), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (EPA) has reviewed yourapplication fora CAATribal Minor New Source Review permit authorizing the construction and operation ofa Refined Coal Treatment System atthe Navajo Generating Station. Yoursigned permit and our notice announcing EPA’s final permit decision is enclosed. Yourpermit becomes effective 30 days afterthe service ofnotice ofthis final permit decision, unless a petition for appeal is properly and timelyfiled with EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board (EAB). In the event a petition for review is filed, construction ofthe Navajo Generating Station RCTS Project cannot begin underthis permit until resolution ofthe EAB petition(s). The final permit, Response to Comments document and otherkey documents relevant to the final permit are also available through a link at our website, https://www.epa.gov/caa-permittingltribal-nsr-permits-region-9, or at www.regulations.gov (search: EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0026). Ifyou have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Larry Maurin at415-972-3943 or maurin.lawrence@epa.gov.

Enclosure

cc: Kyle Heckel, SRP (via email) Donald Benn, Navajo Nation EPA Eugenia Quintana, Navajo Nation EPA (via email) Sincerel

Director, Air Division

Printed on I000o Postconsumer Recycled Pape,: Process Chlorine Free.
No. 53044.

#### E. C. Carter & Son, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 109217-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D. 239), the protests were dismissed.
steam_record - Re: Request for extension for Dayton Power and Light, JM Stuart Station for 

USEPA ICR received on June 18, 2010 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"McCann, Harry" <Harry.McCann@DPLINC.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "McCann, Harry" <Harry.McCann@DPLINC.com> 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "McCann, Harry" <Harry.McCann@DPLINC.com>

Date: 7/14/2010 6:08 AM

Subject: Re: Request for extension for Dayton Power and Light, JM Stuart Station for USEPA 

ICR received on June 18, 2010

Attachments: img-713132643-0001.pdf

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3D5461DO... 8/24/2011
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual report of GEOPHARMA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the three period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Carol Dore-FalconeCarol Dore-FalconeVice President and Chief Financial OfficerJune 29, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 3, 2007.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond**                     (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:                

*1. PSB Holding Corp.*, Preston, Maryland; to engage                     *de novo*                     through its subsidiary, Community Bank Mortgage Corporation, Easton, Maryland, in the origination and sale of residential mortgage loans to the secondary market, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 14, 2007.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E7-4971 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
October 7, 2010 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting with Senator’s Kerry Staff

FROM: Marc Thomas 

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

A conference call was held on September 27, 2010 between members of Senator John Kerry’s 

staff and EPA to discuss how the proposed rule, “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary 

Materials that are Solid Wastes (NHSM),” impacts a series of related proposed rules under 

sections 112 and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), which establish emissions standards for 

boilers, process heaters, and certain solid waste incinerators. EPA discussed generally how the 

proposed rule identifies which non-hazardous secondary materials are, or are not, solid wastes 

when burned in combustion units. EPA also described how, under the CAA, if a non-hazardous 

secondary material is not a “solid waste” under RCRA, and is burned in a combustion unit, then 

the combustion unit that burns that material would be subject to the applicable CAA section 112 

requirements. On the other hand, if the non-hazardous secondary material is considered a “solid 

waste,” then the combustion unit that burns the material would be subject to the CAA 129 

requirements. 

List of Meeting Attendees: 

Meghan Leahy, Senator Kerry 

Karena Neubauer, Senator Kerry 

Michael Ochs, EPA (Region 1, ORA) 

Raquel Snyder, EPA (OCIR) 

George Hull, EPA (OSWER) 

Jim Berlow, EPA (OSWER) 

Marc Thomas, EPA (OSWER) 

Bill Maxwell, EPA (OAQPS)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Cabeza, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 384]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered April 14, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree (two counts), and robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was one of three men who took part in the robbery of a liquor store that resulted in the death of its owner and the serious injury of an employee. He was tried before a separate jury at a joint trial with a codefendant *(see, People v Marshall,*221 AD2d 476 [decided herewith]).

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that error was committed when a prosecution witness testified that a nontestifying codefendant spoke of the defendant and implicated him in the crimes at issue *(see, Bruton v United States,*391 US 123; *People v Hamlin,*71 NY2d 750), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

*461We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Before the Second Division,

March 18, 1952

No. 56482.

protests 155931-K (A), etc. (Norfolk).

#### Hunter Douglas Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the hearing it was agreed between the parties that the merchandise in controversy consisted of aluminum nonferrous ore manufactures and did not consist of ores or concentrates or other crude substances. Uncontradicted evidence was introduced to the effect that the articles were imported to be used in remanufacture by melting and that they have been used in remanufacture by melting. An examination of the papers disclosed that affidavits have been filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, *supra.*Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, R. Byron Carlock, Jr.,
President and Interim Chief Executive Officer, certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and its results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.



|                   |  |                                                                                                          
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10,
2006 |  | /s/ R. Byron Carlock, Jr.Name: R. Byron Carlock, Jr. Title: President and Interim Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 50 (Thursday, March 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4793]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 29, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (David Tatum, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Bill Blanton, Alpharetta, Georgia, as an individual, and a group 
acting in concert consisting of Bill Blanton, Alpharetta; Gilbert T. 
Jones, Sr., Jane Jones, Jewels Jones, Brandy Jones, and Barbe Jones, 
all of Comer; Paula M. Allen, of Dahlonega; Areatha J. Keesey, of 
Oakwood; Kathy L. Cooper, John Cooper, Tyler Cooper, and Donn H. 
Cooper, all of Flowery Branch; Robert Allen, of Manchester; Shelley 
Palmour Anderson, Lanny W. Dunagan, Ann M. Palmour, Wendell A. Turner, 
Howard Bridges, Rebecca Harrison, James H. McBride, James E. Palmour, 
Kim Hunter, Victoria Leigh Hunter, Paden Dunagan, C. Danny Dunagan, all 
of Gainesville; and David C. Harwell, LaVerne Harwell, Douglas F. 
Harwell, Alice Lipscomb, and Franklin D. Harwell, Jr., all of Winder; 
all of Georgia, to acquire control of NBOG Bancorporation, Inc., 
Gainesville, Georgia, and thereby acquire control of The National Bank 
of Gainesville, Gainesville, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 12, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-4793 Filed 3-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bertha English, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 599]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that defendant was denied her right to be present at sidebar conferences with prospective jurors. The trial court repeatedly advised defendant of her right to be present at those conferences, and defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived that right *(see, People v Cousart,*217 AD2d 556; *People v Dennis,*206 AD2d 843, *lv denied*84 NY2d 867; *People v Howard,*206 AD2d 844, *lv denied*84 NY2d 868). The court properly admitted DNA test results into evidence. "Such test results have been accepted as reliable by the relevant scientific community and, because a proper foundation was laid, they were admissible at trial *(see, People v Wesley,*83 NY2d 417; *Frye v United States,*293 F 1013)” *(People v Giomundo,*209 AD2d 953, *Iv denied*85 NY2d 909). The evidence is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of depraved indifference murder (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]), robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [1], [3]) and burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [1] [b], [c]). Defendant’s contention that the court erroneously failed to instruct the jury on the defense of justification has not been preserved for our review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Harrell,*59 NY2d 620), and we decline to exercise our power to address it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J.—Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.