alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Kent A. Greene, Respondent. New York City Department of Personnel, Appellant; *790John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 670]

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 13, 1994, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimant was employed by the New York City Department of Health (hereinafter the City) as a community associate at the same time he worked as a teaching assistant at the College of Staten Island (hereinafter the College). Claimant was enrolled as a graduate student at the College and received compensation for his teaching work. In May 1991, claimant resigned from his position with the City to pursue his studies and, in August 1991, his teaching assignment ended. In determining that claimant was eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits, the Board found that claimant’s "last” employment was his teaching job at the College which, although not "covered” employment for purposes of determining claimant’s benefit rate or the experience rate to be charged . employers, was sufficient to qualify him for benefits because it ended under nondisqualifying conditions. Accordingly, the Board overruled the City’s objection to claimant’s receipt of benefits. The City appeals contending that claimant should be declared ineligible to receive benefits because he voluntarily left his employment with the City to pursue his education.

We disagree. Although claimant’s employment with the College was not "covered” employment *(see, Matter of Mitromaras [Roberts],*122 AD2d 368), it was nevertheless sufficient to break claimant’s prior disqualification which resulted when he left his job with the City *(cf, Matter of Flynn [Hudacs],*209 AD2d 811, *lv denied*85 NY2d 806). Significantly, Labor Law § 593 (1) (a) does not specify that a claimant’s "last” employment must be "covered” employment for purposes of disqualification. Consequently, since claimant left his employment with the College under nondisqualifying conditions, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant was not disqualified from receiving benefits. Therefore, the Board’s decision must be affirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
No. 63161.

#### T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/20267 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
# C_2007271EN.01001501.xml

| 14.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/15

---

Update of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 25, OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 9)

(2007/C 271/09)

The publication of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the commission in conformity with Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code.

In addition to the publication in the OJ, a monthly update is available on the website of Directorate-General Justice, Freedom and Security.

SPAIN

Sea borders

New sea border crossing point:

| | Puerto del Rosario (Fuerteventura). |
| --- | --- |

Puerto del Rosario (Fuerteventura).

NORWAY

Air borders

New air border crossing point (was opened on 1 October 2007):

| | Moss Lufthavn Rygge. |
| --- | --- |

Moss Lufthavn Rygge.

---
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kansas City Power &
Light Company (the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Michael J. Chesser, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Terry Bassham, as Executive Vice President –
Finance and Strategic Development and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Michael J. ChesserName:
                  Title:
                Michael
      J. Chesser
                  Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                February
      27, 2009/s/
      Terry BasshamName:
                  Title:
                Terry
      Bassham
                  Executive
      Vice President – Finance and Strategic Development and Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
                February
      27, 2009





This
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.  This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to
liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except to the extent this Exhibit 32.2 is
expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such
filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Kansas City Power & Light Company
and will be retained by Kansas City Power & Light Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 51120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20749]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Release of Federally 
Obligated Property at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, 
College Park, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(c), 
notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from the 
City of Atlanta, Department of Aviation to waive the requirement that a 
4.5-acre parcel of federally obligated property, located at the 
Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport; be used for 
aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 16, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Atlanta Airports 
District Office, Attn: Aimee A. McCormick, Program Manager, 1701 
Columbia Ave., Campus Building, Suite 2-260, Atlanta, GA 30337-2747.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Louis Miller, Aviation General Manager at 
Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport to the following 
address: City of Atlanta, Department of Aviation, P.O. Box 20509, 
College Park, GA 30320-2509.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aimee McCormick, Program Manager, 
Atlanta Airports District Office, 1701 Columbia Ave., Campus Building, 
Suite 2-260, Atlanta, GA 30337-2747, (404) 305-7143. The application 
may be reviewed in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is reviewing a request by the City 
of Atlanta, Department of Aviation to release 4.50 acres of federally 
obligated property at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. 
The property will be released from federal . obligation so that it may 
be purchased and developed for compatible land uses. The net proceeds 
from the sale of this property will be used for airport purposes. The 
proposed use of this property is compatible with airport operations.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, any 
person may, upon request, inspect the request, notice and other 
documents germane to the request in person at the City of Atlanta, 
Department of Aviation:

    Issued in Atlanta, Georgia, on August 10, 2011.
Scott L. Seritt,
Manager, Atlanta Airports, District Office Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-20749 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual report of Zann Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
      for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David N. Weiker, Sr., Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/
                David N. Weiker, Sr.David
                N. Weiker, Sr., Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive
                Officer, TreasurerApril
                7, 2006
Skip NavigationUSGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Woods Hole Science Center
GIS Compilation of Data Collected from the Pulley Ridge Deep Coral Reef Region OF 2005-1089
OF       2005-1089

Disc       Contents

Introduction

Surficial       Geology

GIS/Visualization

Data       Catalog

References       Cited

Acknowledgments

Contacts

Figure 4. Click on figure for larger       image. Sidescan sonar image of the study area. The       sidescan-sonar imagery does not cover as much area as the multibeam       bathymetry (brown shaded area) due to poor weather conditions that       prevented data collection. Boxes show the locations of images shown in       Figures 5 and 6. 
Skip       Navigation
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and       Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL:       woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2005-1089/htmldocs/fig4.htmPage Contact       Information: WHSC       WebmasterThis page last modified on Monday, 14-Jan-2013 12:50:16       EST
a510683810_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1







March 25, 2015







TO : Calgon Carbon Japan KK







 Re : Renewal of the existing credit facility







Dear Sirs,







We are pleased to inform you that the short term credit facility currently provided to you by our bank will be renewed for another 1 (one) year based on the conditions mentioned as below.


Please note that those conditions are now applicable and no change was made.


 


 


[ Short Term Credit Facility ]




	
Amount

	
JPY1,500,000,000-


	
Signed on

	
March 31, 2010


	
Renewal Date

	
April 2, 2015


	
Maturity Date

	
March 31, 2016


	
Interest Rate

	
Short Term Prime Rate + 0.00%


OR


BTMU Tibor + 1.15%


	
Guarantee

	
Joint and several guarantee issued by the parent company (*)


	
Security

	
Eligible Inventory and Eligible Receivables










 (*Calgon Carbon Corporation)




 


Please note that, apart from the above mentioned facility, we are providing you with a long term loan signed on May 10, 2013 (outstanding balance of JPY450,000,000-) expiring at May 10, 2017.


 


As for detail of the applicable conditions on the above mentioned facilities, please refer to the relevant original agreements. Please feel free to contact with your relationship manager at Yaesudori Commercial Banking Office in charge, should you have any inquiry.







Sincerely,













 



	 	The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.
	 	By: /s/ Hirohisa Hasegawa, General Manager
	 	       Yaesudori Branch





 




 


 






















Acknowledged by

















/s/ Natsuo Watase, President


Date : March 26, 2015
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alan Dorns, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

May 10, 1978

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Garner & Kreinces (Gerald J. Garner*of counsel), for appellant.

*Carl A. Vergari, District Attorney (Gloria M. Dabiri*and *John R. Dinin*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

Defendant’s guilt of harassment was established beyond a *55reasonable doubt (see Penal Law, § 240.25; *People v Todaro,*26 NY2d 325, 330). We have also considered the other issues raised upon the appeal and found them lacking in merit.

Concur: Farley, P. J., Glickman and Pittoni, JJ.
(Reap. Dec. 9538)

#### Henry A. Wess, Inc. (Enterprise Distributing Co.) et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 823, etc.

(Decided November 13, 1959)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the reappraisement appeals listed in the attached Schedule A, which Schedule A is made a part of this stipulation, are limited to binoculars and leather cases and/or straps.

> That at the time of exportation, binoculars and leather cases and/or straps such as, or similar to, those covered by the appeals listed in the attached Schedule A, were being freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States at the per piece prices specified in the attached Schedule A, U.S. dollars, net, packed, which prices were higher than the foreign values as defined in Section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930.

Oil the agreed facts, I find and hold that the proper basis for ap-praisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove referred to, is export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for each of the items is as set forth in said schedule “A.” Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 55288.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 126787-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### JOSEPH MICHAEL CHEEKS, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENTS, v. WOODY LIONEL JACKSON, SR., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

*Messrs. Brenner, New & Brenner*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Moskin &*Weintraub, *Messrs. Breslin & Breslin*and *Messrs. Conway & Leary*for the respondents.

February 27, 1968.

Denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6794** 

JUAN CARLOS OLIVO RAMIREZ , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. FRANK PERRY, Secretary NC Department of Public Safety , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 00484

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : September 13 , 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Juan Carlos Olivo Ramirez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Juan Carlos Olivo Ramirez seeks to appeal the magi strate judge’s recommendation to deny relief on Ramirez’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed . R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Ramirez seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdi ction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 7, 2019

NO. 03-18-00272-CV

Nima Amini, Appellant

v.

Spicewood Springs Animal Hospital, LLC; and Dr. Barak Benaryeh, Appellees

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal of the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to dismiss by operation of law. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible 

error in the court’s denial. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s denial and renders 

judgment granting Appellant’s motion to dismiss. The Court remands the case to the trial court 

for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion and the Texas Citizens Participation 

Act. Appellees shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court 

below.
#### LOUIS M. CARLINI, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

See same case below: 71 *N. J. Super.*101.

*Messrs. David & Albert L. Cohn*and *Mr. Daniel Crystal*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Yauch & Fagan*and *Mr. Frank J. Peterpaul*for the respondent.

April 3, 1962.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Ian T. Bothwell, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Rio Vista Energy Partners L.P.2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of managers:a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Exhibit 10.10


 


Loan Agreement


 


Party A: Bengbu Boyuanzhiye Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Anhui Renrenjia solar energy Co.,
Ltd.


 


Both parties agreed upon the following terms
under fair negotiation circumstances.


 


		1.	Party A agrees Party B to upgrade and reconstruct the spaces located in the People’s industrial
zone of Guzhen County which Party A rented to Party B.



		2.	All upgrade and reconstruction expenses will be paid by Party B, but booked as loan to Party A.



		3.	All upgrade and reconstruction expenses will be paid separately according to the actual progress,
but it will be limited under 4 million Yuan.



		4.	Party A has to repay this loan to Party B before Jan, 1 of 2016.



 


	Party A:Bengbu Boyuanzhiye Co., Ltd.	 	Party B: Anhui Renrenjia Solar Energy Co., Ltd.
	 	 	 
	Signature:	 	Signature:
	 	 	 
	Seal:	 	Seal:
	 	 	 
	May 1st, 2013
#### FRANK H. HUGHES, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. THE COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

See same case below: 99 *N. J. Super.*405.

*Messrs. Powell & Davis*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Orlando & Cummins*for the respondent.

May 14, 1968.

Denied.
No. 46174.

#### Protests 789916-G, etc., of Albrecht Import Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.