alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Terence Yap, the Chief Financial Officer of CHINA SECURITY &SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that: 

-  The Company's Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report"), fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and  Information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results  of operation of the Company. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed thisstatement this 5th day of December 2008. 

/s/ Terence Yap Terence Yap Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc.and will be retained by China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.
#### In the Matter of Charles H. Brackett, a Private in the Thirteenth Regiment.

Order reversed, with twenty-five dollars costs. Opinion by Barnard, P. J.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned  hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,  to my  knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2005 of Universal Communication Systems,  Inc. (the Company)  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information  contained in such periodic report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of  operations  of the  Company as of, and for,  the periods  presented  in such report.

Date:  January 13, 2006



| |                         
| | ------------------------
| | /s/ CURTISORGILL        
| | Curtis Orgill           
| | Chief Financial Officer,
| | (Principal Financial and
| | Accounting Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lamont Person, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 1008]

—Appeal by the *378defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), rendered July 8, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the prosecution failed to adduce legally sufficient evidence that he knowingly possessed more than 500 milligrams of cocaine *(see,*Penal Law § 220.06 [5]; *see also, People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10; *People v Ryan,*82 NY2d 497), and we decline to reach this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(see, People v Smith,*217 AD2d 565; *People v Oakman,*215 AD2d 596; *People v St. Hill,*215 AD2d 510; *People v Lawrence,*212 AD2d 638; *People v Bright,*210 AD2d 244). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Noble,*86 NY2d 814; *see also, People v Cruz,*197 AD2d 630; *People v Ward,*191 AD2d 661). We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
114°W 113.5°W

SE36113B8

| > NE36113A8

SW36113A7

SEON  -nsssescesetdecnrernothgsss Hammpnaidesessaleasstesctgaeedsceee Bec Ec ue cencu ees linciuad ects

decd Grand Canyon
National Park

NE35113H7
SE35113H6
swssttsHed j
NW3511365)
NE3511366. i)
SW3511365
Hualapai
C] ] Reservation |
Hid |
0 10 KILOMETERS

MILES

35.5°N = -
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-617 

________________________________________________________________________ 

FISHERIES 

Pacific Salmon 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CANADA 

Relating to and Amending 

Annex IV of the 

Treaty of January 28, 1985, as 

Amended 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Ottawa April 26 and June 17, 2005 

with 

Attachments 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CANADA 

Fisheries: Pacific Salmon 

 Agreement relating to and amending Annex IV of 

 the treaty of January 28, 1985, as amended. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Ottawa 

 April 26 and June 17, 2005; 

 Entered into force June 17, 2005. 

 With attachments. 






















NOTE: At the present time the Treaty Office does not have the Enclosures to the

 Canadian Note. If these Enclosures are received, they will be added 

 to this publication.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-10721

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00052-SDM-MAP-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

DAVID L. BULLOCK, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(August 29, 2017)

Before HULL, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 17-10721 Date Filed: 08/29/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Thomas A. Burns, appointed appellate counsel for David Leon Bullock in 

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of 

the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 778 

(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that the counsel’s 

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent 

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s 

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bullock’s conviction and sentence are 

AFFIRMED. 

Case: 17-10721 Date Filed: 08/29/2017 Page: 2 of 2
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21

- 1031 V

UNPUBLISHED

CHARLES HESS

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: January 10, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;
Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Timothy James Lessman , Knutson & Casey Law F ir m, Mankato, MN

, for P etitioner.

Joseph Adam Lewis , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On March 5, 2021

, Charles Hess filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Gui llain Barre Syndrome ( “ G BS ” ) as a

re sult of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine received on September 2 1, 2018 . Petition at 1

. Petitioner further alleges that he received the vaccine in the Unite d States, suffered the

resi dual effects or complications of his illness for more than si x months

, and has never received compensation or file d a civil action for his vaccine

- related injuries . Petition at 1, ¶¶ 18

- 19

. T he case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special

Masters.

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material f its within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012 ).2

On January 6, 2022

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, R espondent agrees that “ petitioner has satisfied the cr iteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table ( “ Table ” ) and the Qualifications and Aids t o Interpretation ( “ QAI ” ) for GBS following a flu vaccine

. ” Id. at 8

.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
#### William Lee *v.*The Troy Citizens’ Gas-Light Company.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Boardman, J., and by Bookes, J., dissenting.
#### Harry L. Horton, *Appellant, v.*The Pacific National Bank of Boston, *Respondent.*

Order affirmed, without costs. Opinion by Brady, J.
6861

#### HUDSON v. SCHUMPERT.

*Ruled by case of Hudson*v. *Schumpert, post,*23.

Before Gary, J., Lexington, August, 1905.

Reversed.

Action by W. A. Hudson against Sol. D. Schumpert. Prom judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

*Messrs. Efird &*Dreher, for appdlant.

*Mr. J. B. Wingard,*contra.

April 11, 1908.

The opinion of tire Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Pope.

The complaint of the second action is the same as in the first, except the change of party-*23defendant, and the description of the tract of land alleged to contain 116 acres.

The answer in the second case is the same as in the first except necessary changes of names.

The case was tried before his Honor, Judge Ernest Gary, August, 1905, and he directed a verdict for the defendant.

In as much, therefore, as this case is similar in all respects to the case of *W. A. Hudson*v. *Joseph Schumpert,*and the judgment there was in favor of a reversal of such judgment and a new trial granted; it is so ordered here.
No. 53067.

#### Cosmos Shipping Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 133568-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial the collector’s memorandum was moved in evidence and the case submitted. An examination of .said memorandum showed that an error had been made by the surveyor in reporting the weight of 14 bales of thread waste. The surveyor’s amended report showed a gross weight for these 14 bales as 3,696 instead of 3,896, as previously reported. In view of the evidence presented, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry-assessing duty at the appropriate rate upon the basis of 3,696 pounds, rather than 3,896 pounds, and to make refund accordingly.
```

                                                             EXHIBIT 32.2

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, (the "Report") of Technology Investment Capital Corp. (the
"Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof; I, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.

                       /s/ Patrick F. Conroy
                  ------------------------------------------------------
                  Name:   Patrick F. Conroy
                  Date:   November 12, 2004
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Seifi Ghasemi, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 5, 2010          |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| /s/ SEIFI  GHASEMI               |   |
| Seifi  Ghasemi                        |   |
| Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

1

----
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

79–418 2002

107th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–205

AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES

OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, THE SUPREME

COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE THAT HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE COURT, PURSUANT

TO 28 U.S.C. 2075

MAY 3, 2002.—Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and ordered

to be printed

(1)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES,

Washington, DC, April 29, 2002.

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT,

Speaker of the House of Representatives,

Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: By direction of the Supreme Court of the

United States, I have the honor to submit to the Congress the

amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure that

have been adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States pursuant to Section 2075 of Title 28, United States Code.

Accompanying these rules are excerpts from the report of the Judicial Conference of the United States containing the Committee

Notes submitted to the Court for its consideration pursuant to Section 331 of Title 28, United States Code.

Sincerely,

WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST.

(3)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40
No. 55323.

#### S. S. Sarna *v.*United States,

protest 135292-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Mexican tecali stones suitable for use in the manufacture of jewelry similar in all material respects to those the subject of *L. Heller & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1268), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
CERTIFICATION



I, Arthur Viola, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of INFe-Human Resources, Inc.;



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





July 21, 2008



/s/  ARTHUR VIOLA

________________________

Arthur Viola

Chief Executive Officer and Sole Director
No. 45045.

#### Protests 31234-K, etc., of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the atomizers are of the same character as those passed upon in Abstract 44140. They were accordingly held dutiable as glass articles at 60 percent under paragraph 218(f) as claimed.
exh_1013.htm



Exhibit 10.13


 


LEADERSHIP TEAM EQUITY GRANT PROGRAM


UNDER THE ONVIA, INC. 2008 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN







 


1.  Onvia leadership has an opportunity to own 10% of the outstanding shares of the company.  The leaders who participate in the program are:


 





	 	Hank Riner	CEO	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Cameron Way 	Senior VP and CFO	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Naveen Rajkumar 	Senior VP and CIO	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	TBD	Senior VP of Product	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	TBD 	Senior VP of Sales	 







 


2.  The named executives above have the potential to earn 10% of the outstanding shares of the company through grants of stock options.


 


One half of the options will be granted for each of the respective performance years (“time-based”), and the other half will be granted if the performance measurement for the respective performance years is achieved (“performance-based”).  Time-based and performance-based options are granted effective December 31st of the respective performance years:  2015, 2016 and 2017.  The options will be granted from the available pool of the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) and will be subject to the terms and provisions of the 2008 Plan.


 


3.  Grants can be earned annually based upon performance criteria set by the Board.  The number of potential performance-based options for each leader is calculated as follows:


 








	 	Total Outstanding Shares of Company as of the grant date	 
	 	 	 
	 	
% Ownership Potential for Individual Leader

	 
	 	 	 
	 	
Total # of Potential Options for Individual Leader

	 
	 	 	 
	 	
Minus 50% Time-Based Options

	 
	 	 	 
	 	Total Potential Performance-Based Options	 
	 	 	 	 









4.  Each leader has the opportunity to earn 1/3 of the potential performance based options at the end of each of three years:  2015, 2016 and 2017.  For 2015 the performance measurement is the achievement of a Board defined goal regarding EBITDA.  Each year the Board will establish a new performance criteria.


 


5.  Once time-based and performance-based options have been granted there is a 24 month vesting period from grant date.  One eighth of the options will be vested each quarter for a two year period.  For example options granted for 2015 performance will be vested according to the following vesting schedule:  1/8 March 31, 2016, 1/8 June 30, 2016, 1/8 September 30, 2016, 1/8 December 31, 2016, 1/8 March 31, 2017, 1/8 June 30, 2017, 1/8 September 30, 2017, 1/8 December 31, 2017.


 




  





  











  






6.  Currently outstanding stock options count toward the total potential options for each leader.


 


7.  Hank Riner is ineligible for the first grant (even if performance criteria is met) until certain individual performance criteria are achieved.


 


8.  Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the 2008 Plan) and a material reduction in the executive’s responsibilities or authority as in effect before the change in control, the vesting of all unvested options granted pursuant to this program will automatically be accelerated so that 100% shall be fully vested.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) of Technology Investment Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/S/ JONATHAN H. COHEN                       
|Name: Jonathan H. Cohen Date: August 7, 2007