alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





Certificate of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Surgical Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James Longaker, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Report and result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.




/s/James Longaker




James Longaker


Chief Financial Officer




August 13, 2010




This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit
23.1






CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-97263, 333-132829, 333-114486, and 333-133891, all on Form S-3, and
Registration Statements Nos. 333-132828, 33-45618, 333-142774, and 333-147939,
all on Form S-8, of our reports dated February 28, 2008, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Great
Plains Energy Incorporated and subsidiaries (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption
of new accounting standards) and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Great
Plains Energy Incorporated and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31,
2007.





/s/DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP




Kansas
City, Missouri


February
28, 2008
No. 65563.

#### The A. W. Fenton Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/6580 (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 65554.

#### Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/32167, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 58077.

protest 204020-K (New York).

#### Atiyeh Bros. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliveb, C. J.

The undisputed facts showed that the rugs in question are so-called “market Kerman,” whose measurement should have been computed on the basis of 7.24 square feet to the Persian unit called “a zar,” as claimed by plaintiff, rather than on the basis of 6.75 square feet to “a zar,” the measurement applicable to the so-called “contract Kerman” rugs, as adopted by the customs officials. The claim of the plaintiff was sustained accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8296 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8296

 To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to require Federal 
 agencies to submit to the Comptroller General of the United States a 
  report on rules that are revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or 
                      otherwise made ineffective.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2024

  Mr. Bentz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to require Federal 
 agencies to submit to the Comptroller General of the United States a 
  report on rules that are revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or 
                      otherwise made ineffective.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``GAO Database Modernization Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. RULES NO LONGER IN EFFECT.

    (a) In General.--Section 801(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(D) For any rule submitted under subparagraph (A), if the Federal 
agency promulgating the rule, in whole or in part, revokes, suspends, 
replaces, amends, or otherwise makes the rule ineffective, or the rule 
is made ineffective for any other reason, the Federal agency shall 
submit to the Comptroller General a report containing--
            ``(i) the title of the rule;
            ``(ii) the Federal Register citation for the rule, if any;
            ``(iii) the date on which rule was submitted to the 
        Comptroller General; and
            ``(iv) a description of the provisions of the rule that are 
        being revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or otherwise made 
        ineffective.''.
    (b) Sunset.--Effective on the date that is 6 years after the date 
of enactment of this Act, section 801(a)(1) of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking subparagraph (D), as added by subsection 
(a).
                                 <all>
```
No. 56015.

protest 157040-K (Baltimore).

#### Rene D. Lyon Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The protest was overruled as unsupported.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Seifi Ghasemi,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 5,  2009          |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| /s/ SEIFI GHASEMI                |   |
| Seifi Ghasemi                         |   |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
1-900 JACKPOT, INC. (FORMERLY PULTRONEX CORPORATION)
                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph  Batty,  solely for the purpose of  complying  with 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
hereby  certify  that to my  knowledge  Annual  Report  of 1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.
(formerly  Pultronex  Corporation)  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31,
2001 ("Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such
Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of 1-900 Jackpot, Inc. (formerly Pultronex Corporation).



DATE:  SEPTEMBER 15, 2005

/S/ JOSEPH BATTY
------------------------
    JOSEPH BATTY
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 13.1

ALESTRA, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Rolando Zubirán Shetler, the Chief Executive Officer of Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the
Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 29, 2011



Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V.By:

/s/ Rolando Zubirán ShetlerRolando Zubirán ShetlerChief Executive Officer


This certification
accompanies the report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporated it by reference.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7657

KORELL ROBERT FLOYD BATTLE, a/k/a Korell Battle,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SHERIFF JAMES R. METTS, Lexington County Detention Center, LCDC; SERGEANT SCOTT MCDERMOTH, Lexington County Detention Center; CAPTAIN O’NIEL, a/k/a Captain O’Neill, Lexington County Detention Center; SERGEANT BATES, Lexington County Detention Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-00466-GRA)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 22, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Korell Robert Floyd Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Korell Robert Floyd Battle appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Battle v. Metts , No. 8:07-cv-00466-GRA (D.S.C.

July 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.29 Letter Agreement 2015 Bonus Schwartz








NPC International, Inc.
7300 West 129 Street 
Overland Park, Kansas 66213
March 4, 2015




JAMES K. SCHWARTZ


Re:    2015 Bonus Eligibility


Dear Mr. Schwartz:


Reference is made to that certain Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement"), dated November 4, 2011, by and among NPC International, Inc. ("NPC"), NPC Acquisition Holdings, LLC ("Holdings"), NPC International Holdings, Inc. ("Parent")  and James K. Schwartz ("Employee").  All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Employment Agreement.


Employee hereby acknowledges and agrees that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Employment Agreement, solely in respect of the Company's fiscal year ending December 29, 2015 ("FY2015"), the Bonus Compensation scheme set forth in Section 4.2 of the Employment Agreement shall be disregarded (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any Management Performance Bonus Compensation, Adjusted EBITDA Bonus Compensation, FCF Bonus Compensation and Revenue Bonus Compensation or other bonus referred to in the Employment Agreement) and, in lieu thereof, Employee shall be eligible for a FY2015 bonus as determined by the Compensation Committee in consultation with Employee.  


Except as expressly modified above, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect (including in respect of any Bonus Compensation after FY2015).


* * * * * * *







Please acknowledge your agreement with the terms of this letter agreement by counter-signing and returning this letter agreement to the Company.


Very truly yours,


NPC INTERNATIONAL, INC.




By:      Troy D. Cook
Name:     Troy D. Cook
Title:    Executive Vice President – Finance and CFO






ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT


Effective as of the date of this letter agreement, Employee hereby agrees to be bound by its terms.


/s/ James K. Schwartz  
James K. Schwartz
No. 65557.

#### Quon Quon Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/9812, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” and “B” consist of silent butlers the same in all material respects as those involved in *The Fan Company*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C.D. 1261); that the items marked “C” and “D” consist of trays the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C.D. 710); and that the items marked “E” consist of agate trays and rosequartz bowls similar in all respects, except as to the component material of chief value, to the merchandise involved in said C.D. 710. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited authorities, the articles in question were held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked “A” at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of brass, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; (2) the items marked “B” at 35 percent under the provision in said paragraph 339, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T.D. 49753), for household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of copper, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; (3) the items'marked “C” at 35 percent under the provision in said paragraph 339, as modified, *supra,*for household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of copper (not brass), not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; (4) the items marked “D” at 40 percent under said paragraph 339 as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of brass, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; and (5) the items marked “E” at 50 percent under paragraph 233 as articles of household use, not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of agate or other semiprecious stone, not cut into shapes and forms fitting them expressly for use in the construction of jewelry.
No. 45012.

#### Protests 666023-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same as that the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
Before the First Division,

July 13, 1942

No. 47393.

#### Protest 774695-G of American Import Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The sample consists of a crude imitation of a gijn, having a crank, and a clapper, which makes a noise as the crank is turned. Plaintiff’s witness, in charge of sales for the plaintiff company, testified that he sold such articles at wholesale to dealers or merchants who handle carnival goods; that he had seen them used at New Year’s Eve parties, Hallowe’en parties, and at the Sacramento Fair; and that at the latter place he observed only children using them but was unable to say on the other occasions whether they were used by children or adults. On the record, presented it was held that the plaintiff has failed to overcome by competent material evidence the presumption of correctness of the collector that the articles are used for the amusement of children. The protest was therefore overruled.

Dallinger, J., concurring.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5045 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify a provision relating to 

criminal penalties for damaging or destroying pipeline facilities, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BUDD, Mrs. CAPITO, Mrs. 

FISCHER, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. MORAN, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. YOUNG, and 

Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify a provision 

relating to criminal penalties for damaging or destroying 

pipeline facilities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe and Secure 

5 Transportation of American Energy Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES. 

7 Section 60123(b) of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘damaging or destroying’’ and insertVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:46 Sep 17, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S5045.IS S5045

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5045 IS

1 ing ‘‘damaging, destroying, vandalizing, tampering with, 

2 disrupting the operation or construction of, or preventing 

3 the operation or construction of’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****A compendium of NIOSH miningresearch**
 
1999:FebAprJulOct
2000:AprJulOct
2001:AprJulOct
2002:AprJulOct
2003:Apr
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.7132:
Item Number:0499-F-23 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000551785
 
February 5, 2020
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roger Scott, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 570]

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was denied his right to appear before the Grand Jury *(see,*CPL 190.50 [5]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, the record establishes that defendant was given sufficient opportunities to appear before the Grand Jury, but failed to avail himself of those opportunities. The record also fails to support the contention of defendant that the jury engaged in premature deliberations.

Defendant further contends that the court erred in failing to instruct the jurors adequately concerning the proper use of any notes they took during the trial. Because no objection was made to the adequacy of the court’s instructions, that issue has not been preserved for our review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Tucker,*153 AD2d 164, 168, *affd*77 NY2d 861), and we decline *981to exercise our power to reach it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). In any event, the court’s note-taking instructions were adequate *(see, People v Tucker, supra,*at 166, 169).

We have reviewed the remaining contentions of defendant and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
# ENCLOSURE 4 : CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 40 CFR§ 51 .102 ANDAPPENDIX VOF 40 CFR PART 51CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 40 CFR§ 51 .102 &APP. VOF 40 CFR PART 51 REGARDING REVISIONS TOVERMONT'S STATE IMPLEMENTATION (SIP) As required by 40 CFR§ 51 .102(f),1 hereby certify that the requirements of 40 CFR § 51 .102(a)-(d) were met and that the public notice and hearing procedure followed was consistent with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, as applicable. Public notice of the proposed amendments to Vermont's Air Pollution Control Regulations and revisions to Vermont's SIPwas posted online on May 18, 2011, at https ://secure.vermont .gov/SOS/rules/index.php and published on May 26, 2011, in the Secretary of State's newspapers of record. The public was provided with the opportunity to comment until June 28, 2011 . In addition, a public hearing was held on June 21, 2011 at 6:OOpm in the Auditoriumin the Pavilion Office Building located at 109 State Street in Montpelier, Vermont.

Richard A

. Valentinetti Certifying Officer
No. 63172.

#### Applicator Enterprises, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/21421 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sponges similar in all material respect to those the subject of Abstract 61191, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61409.

protest 284284-K (New York).

#### Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

*521Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.