alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Phillippa P., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 287]

—Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered October 24, 1994, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of intimidating a victim in the third degree, and placed her with the Division for Youth for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We find the evidence legally sufficient to establish respondent’s guilt of the crime of intimidating a witness in the third degree (Penal Law § 215.15 [1]). In so doing, we reject respondent’s argument that the statute is inapplicable to attempts to coerce a complainant to "drop * * * charges” *(People v Soper,*209 AD2d 829, 830, *lv denied*84 NY2d 1039), or to instances where the complainant already has given statements or evidence to police *(People v Buchanon,*176 AD2d 1001). Testimony that the respondent choked the complainant, hit her in the back of the head or neck, and threatened to kill her or see her killed if the charges were not dropped, along with testimony *160regarding respondent’s prior assault upon the victim with a box cutter, permitted the inference that the respondent instilled fear of physical injury in the victim *(see, People v Soper, supra; People v Wager, 199*AD2d 642, 643, *lv denied*83 NY2d 811). Upon an independent review of the facts, we are also satisfied that the Family Court determination was not against the weight of the evidence. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
# Map            Iraq country profile.
Exhibit 10.30


 


Schedule of Annexes not Filed with Exhibit
10.29 pursuant to 


Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation
S-K


 


This Schedule identifies the annexes to the contract filed as
Exhibit 10.29 (the “Contract”) which were omitted from such Exhibit pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation
S-K. Capitalized terms used herein have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Contract.


 


		1.	Annex No. 1 to Annex 1 – Model Letter of Offer – This annex is substantially identical in all material respects
to the cover letter attached as Annex 2 to the Contract, except that it (a) contains blanks instead of the names of the contractor
and its representative, and (b) is not signed.



 


		2.	Annex No. 2 to Annex 1 – Contract Model – This annex is substantially identical in all material respects
to the Contract, except as follows:



 


		(a)	Title – The Contract No. and name of the Contractor are blank.



 


		(b)	Article I – Special Conditions – The information regarding the Company’s legal representative and all information
regarding the Contractor are blank.



 


		(c)	Section 1.1 – Purpose – The Contractor’s Offer No. and filing date are blank.



 


		(d)	Section 1.4 – Value of Contract – The maximum value of the contract is blank.



 


		(e)	Section 1.16 – Administrators – The information regarding the Contract Administrators of the Company and the Contractor
are blank.



 


		(f)	Section 1.20 – Notices – The contact information for the parties is blank.



 


		(g)	Section 1.22 – Rates – This section is blank.



 


		(h)	Section 2.4.3 – Annexes – The place of execution, date of execution and signature boxes are blank.



 


		(i)	Section 1.16 – Administrators – The information regarding the Contract Administrators of the Company and the Contractor
are blank.



 


		3.	Annex No. 6 to Annex 1 – HSEQ Annex for Contractors – This annex is substantially identical in all material
respects to Annex 4 to the Contract.



 


		4.	Annex No. 7 to Annex 1 – Contractual Annex Corporate Social Responsibility 
                                                          – This annex                                                           is
                                                          substantially                                                                                                     identical
                                                          in all material respects to Annex 5 to the                                                           Contract.



 


		5.	Annex No. 8 to Annex 1 – Annex Invoicing – This annex is substantially identical in
                                                          all material respects to Annex 6 to the Contract.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Marlin Business Services Corp.Date: November 4, 2008
 /s/ Daniel P. DyerDaniel P. DyerChief Executive Officer/s/ Lynne C. WilsonLynne C. WilsonChief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### EDWARD A. COX, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. BOND TRANSPORTATION, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. MICHAEL P. MURPHY, By HIS GUARDIAN *AD LITEM, ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. BOND TRANSPORTATION, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

See same case below: 99 *N. J. Super.*335.

*Mr. Vincent 0. DeMaio*and *Mr. Kenneth K. Joel*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Jjamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne*and *Mr. Qarroll A. Morley*for the respondent.

May 14, 1968.

Granted.
No. 38903.

#### Protests 757380-G, etc., of Mekelburg Specialty Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dynamic Response Group, Inc; (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Melissa K. Rice, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: April 15, 2009



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Melissa K. Rice                     
|Melissa K. Rice, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2007-2008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-514]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Class III Gaming Amendment taking effect.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is given that the Amendment to the Tribal-State gaming 
compact between the State of California and the Quechan Tribe of the 
Fort Yuma Indian Reservation is considered approved and is in effect.

[[Page 2008]]


DATES: Effective Date: January 17, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under Section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands.
    The compact allows for up to 1,100 gaming devices, adds provisions 
addressing problem gambling, off reservation traffic impacts and 
workplace occupational health and safety standards. Finally, the term 
of the compact is until December 31, 2025. The Amendment, also, 
authorizes annual payments to the State for geographical exclusivity. 
The Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Department of 
the Interior, through his delegated authority, is publishing notice 
that the Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact between the State of 
California and the Quechan Tribe of The Fort Yuma Indian Reservation is 
now in effect.

    Dated: January 4, 2007.
Michael D. Olsen,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. E7-514 Filed 1-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|November 14, 2007 | /s/ Marc N. Teal       
|----------------- | -----------------------
|                  | Marc N. Teal           
|                  | Chief Financial Officer
|                  |
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Defense
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Anthony
Piscitelli, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Company and
Gary Sidorsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to our best knowledge:




1.    
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.    
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      November 23, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Anthony PiscitelliAnthony
      PiscitelliChief
      Executive Officer, President and ChairmanBy:
              /s/ Gary SidorskyGary
      SidorskyChief
      Financial Officer
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                                  MAXNET, INC.


         MAXNET, INC., a corporation  organized and existing under and by virtue
of the general corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST.  That the Board of Directors of said  corporation,  at a meeting
duly convened and held, adopted the following resolution:

                  RESOLVED  that  the  Board of  Directors  hereby  declares  it
         advisable and in the best interest of the Company that Article FIRST of
         the Certificate of Incorporation be amended to read as follows:

                  FIRST: The name of this corporation shall be:

                                 MAXPLANET CORP.

         SECOND. That the said amendment has been consented to and authorized by
the holders of a majority of the issued and  outstanding  stock entitled to vote
by written consent given in accordance with the provisions of Section 228 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         THIRD. That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Sections 242 and 228 of the general Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  said corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by Israel Goldreich this 20th day of July A . D. 1999

                               ISRAEL GOLDREICH, Secretary
                               Authorized Officer
No. 53612.

protests 103180-K, etc. (Boston and Ogdensburg).

#### T. D. Downing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8205 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit fraud 

in connection with posting bail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 8205 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Violent Of3 fenders Off Our Streets Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FRAUD IN CONNECTION WITH POSTING BAIL. 

5 Section 1033(f)(1)(A) of title 18, United States Code, 

6 is amended by inserting before the comma the following: 

7 ‘‘(including the posting of monetary bail, criminal bail 

8 bonds, and Federal immigration bail bonds)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. app. I section 10(d), of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and 5 U.S.C. 552b, the Government in the Sunshine Act, a report summarizing the closed meeting activities of the Art Advisory Panel during 2006 has been prepared. A copy of this report has been filed with the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Management. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         This notice is effective March 23, 2007.                     

# ADDRESSES:

                        The report is available for public inspection and requests for copies should be addressed to: Internal Revenue Service, Freedom of Information Reading Room, Room 1621, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, telephone number (202) 622-5164 (not a toll free number). The report is also available at                         *http://www.irs.gov*.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Carolan, AP:ART, Internal Revenue Service/Appeals, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005, telephone (202) 435-5609 (not a toll free telephone number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue has determined that this document is not a major rule as defined in Executive Order 12291 and that a regulatory impact analysis therefore, is not required. Neither does this document constitute a rule subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6). 

Mark W. Everson, 

Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

[FR Doc. E7-5283 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Home Mortgage Investment
Corp. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Strauss, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Registrant.

November 9, 2006

                                   /s/ Michael Strauss
                                 --------------------------------------
                                 Michael Strauss
                                 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                 and President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of East Coast Diversified Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Richard Margulies, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard Margulies

Richard MarguliesChief Executive OfficerDated: September 19, 2007

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to East Coast Diversified Corporationand will be retained by East Coast Diversified Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 53601.

protests 147897-K, etc. (New York).

#### Maywood Chemical Works *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 65572.

#### American Bitumuls *&*Asphalt Company *v.*United States,

protests 326400-K(B), etc. (Mobile).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cutback asphalt the same in all material respects as that the subject of *American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 2188), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 64204.

protests 299919-K, etc. (New York).

#### Copco Eastern, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of mining and construction machines, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EPA Registration Jacket 432-1478

Vol.1
No. 58615.

protest 228370-K (New York).

#### Getz Bros. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
#### Solon Conklin, *Respondent, v.*William O. Douglas, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Learned, P. J.
Skip NavigationUSGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Woods Hole Science Center
GIS Compilation of Data Collected from the Pulley Ridge Deep Coral Reef Region OF 2005-1089
OF       2005-1089

Disc       Contents

Introduction

Surficial       Geology

GIS/Visualization

Data       Catalog

References       Cited

Acknowledgments

Contacts

Figure 6, A-C. Click on figure for larger       image. Detailed view of a small section of the sidescan       sonar image (6A) from the southern part of the study area showing the       presence of pits and mounds. The bottom photographs show examples of the       pits (6B) and mounds (6C) which are thought to have been formed, or at       least modified, by fish. The sidescan image is located at box 6 in Figures       4 and 5. 
Skip       Navigation
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and       Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL:       woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2005-1089/htmldocs/fig6.htmPage Contact       Information: WHSC       WebmasterThis page last modified on Monday, 14-Jan-2013 12:50:16       EST