alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 61911.

#### United China & Glass Company *v.*United States,

protest 316258-K/15079 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise described as decorated earthenware provincial covered boxes, item 47/2522, contained in cases 35 to 38, page 21 of the invoice, and cases 1209 *547to 1216, page 24 of the invoice, consists of decorated earthenware tableware, valued at $2 or more per dozen, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8180 

To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 with respect to a 

civil action relating to the disclosure of intimate images. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2024 

Ms. MACE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 with 

respect to a civil action relating to the disclosure of 

intimate images. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Increased Account5 ability for Nonconsensual Pornography Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTION RELATING TO DISCLOSURE OF INTI7 MATE IMAGES. 

8 Section 1309 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 

9 2022 (15 U.S.C. 6851) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8180 IH

1 (A) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘com2 petent,’’ after ‘‘conscious,’’; and 

3 (B) in paragraph (5)(A)— 

4 (i) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

5 the end; 

6 (ii) in clause (ii)— 

7 (I) in subclause (I), by striking 

8 the semicolon at the end and inserting 

9 ‘‘; or’’; 

10 (II) in subclause (II), by striking 

11 ‘‘; or’’ and inserting a semicolon; and 

12 (III) by striking subclause (III); 

13 and 

14 (iii) by adding at the end the fol15 lowing: 

16 ‘‘(iii) an identifiable individual engag17 ing in sexually explicit conduct; and’’; and 

18 (2) in subsection (b)(3)(A)(i), by striking 

19 ‘‘$150,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$500,000’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 5

CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

I, Chris I. von Christierson, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd. (the issuer);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

1.

The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 29, 2006

/s/ Chris I. von ChristiersonChris I. von Christierson
Chief Executive Officer
August 4, 1942

No. 47434.

Suit 4379.

#### Absorbo *Beer Pad Co., Inc.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 580 reversed June 15, 1942; not yet reported.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

INVENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1988

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:14-cv-00448-GMS, Judge 

Gregory M. Sleet.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

RICHARD CHARLES WEINBLATT, Stamoulis & Weinblatt 

LLC, Wilmington, DE, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

 DAVID BRANDON CONRAD, Fish & Richardson P.C., 

Dallas, TX, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by RICARDO BONILLA, NEIL J. MCNABNAY; JOHN A.

DRAGSETH, Minneapolis, MN.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (WALLACH, PLAGER, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 7, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
No. 47926.

#### Protest 94106-K of Alpha Lux Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated chat the merchandise in question is in all material respects the same as that the subject of Abstract 47453. The protest was therefore sustained.
No. 56000.

protests 173190-K, etc. (New York).

#### Heller Hope Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
116 STAT. 2892 PUBLIC LAW 107–343—DEC. 17, 2002

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2109:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107–390 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 107–273 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

Apr. 30, considered and passed House.

Nov. 19, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–343

107th Congress

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study

of Virginia Key Beach Park in Biscayne Bay, Florida, for possible inclusion

in the National Park System.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND CRITERIA.

(a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior (in this Act referred

to as ‘‘the Secretary’’) shall conduct a study of Virginia Key Beach

Park in Biscayne Bay, Florida, which was used for recreation by

African Americans at a time when public beaches were racially

segregated by law. The study shall evaluate the national significance of the site and the suitability and feasibility of establishing

the site as a unit of the National Park System.

(b) CRITERIA.—In conducting the study required by subsection

(a), the Secretary shall use the criteria for the study of areas

for potential inclusion in the National Park System contained in

section 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5; popularly known

as the National Park System General Authorities Act).

SEC. 2. REPORT.

Upon completion of the study, the Secretary shall transmit

to the Congress a report on the findings of the study and the

conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.

Approved December 17, 2002.

Dec. 17, 2002

[H.R. 2109]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7252

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AIRRION CURTIS AGEE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CR-97-287)

Submitted: December 27, 2001 Decided: January 14, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Airrion Curtis Agee, Appellant Pro Se. James Brien Comey, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Airrion Curtis Agee seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Agee, No. CR-97-287 (E.D. Va. July 11,

2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 38899.

#### Protest 913771-G of Robbins, Inc. (Duluth).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEILS R. ELLIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued January 23, 1962

Decided March 19, 1962.

*Mr. John P. Kozale,*Assistant Prosecutor of Middlesex County, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent *(Mr. Edward J. Dolan,*Prosecutor, attorney).

*Mr. Andrew V. Ciarle*argued the cause for defendant-appellant *(Messrs. Seaman & Ciarle,*attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Cueiam.

Defendant appeals from a denial of a writ of *habeas corpus*by the Middlesex County Court.

The application is grounded basically upon an allegation that a plea of *nolo contendere*was entered to a murder indictment on behalf of defendant by his court-appointed attorney without defendant’s authorization and without understanding on his part of the nature of the plea.

*85We have examined the record and are satisfied that defendant knew the nature of the plea and authorized his counsel to enter said plea.

Affirmed.

*For*affirmance—-Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—7.

*For*reversal—Hone.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting of the aforementioned SEP:

*Time and Date:*                         12 p.m.-4 p.m., May 3, 2007 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of scientific merit of grant applications received in response to RFAs DD07-004 and DD07-005, “Thrombosis and Hemostasis Centers Research and Prevention Network.”                              ( print page 11364)    

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Christine Morrison, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone 404.639.3098.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Elaine L. Baker,

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E7-4533 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
p130465.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0465

Focus Ready Draft 6/10/2013

ENGINEER: Austin \ AH

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Chemical goggles, protective clothing

impervious to this material.

Respirator: No protection is ordinarily required under

normal conditions of use and with adequate ventilation.

Respiratory protection must be used if air contamination

exceeds acceptable level.

Health Effects: Eye: May cause eye irritation. Not known

to cause permanent injury to eye tissue. Inhalation: No

information available. Skin: Prolonged or repeated skin

contact may cause irritation. Not expected to be a skin

irritant. Ingestion: No information about adverse

effects due to exposure.

TLV/PEL:

None established for PMN

CRSS :

 

 

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (06/04/2013):

Page 1
p130465.eng

Migration to groundwater: 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0465

Page 2
p130465.eng

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description: Raw materials --> reaction -->

polymerization, PMN formed --> distillation --> drumming

of PMN substance (liquid, 90%) (submission)

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

 

 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0465

Page 3
p130465.eng

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:

Page 4
p130465.eng

Page 5
#### Rebecca Quell and Henry Quell, *Plaintiffs, v.*Frederick Cromwell, *Defendant*

Judgment for plaintiffs upon submitted case, without costs. Opinion by Gilbert, J.
Exhibit 10(a) - Manager Compensation Arrangements (12.31.2014)






Exhibit 10(a)


Manager Compensation Arrangements


Managers who are current or former officers of Energy Future Holdings Corp. or any of its subsidiaries or employed by the Sponsor Group do not receive any fees for their service as managers.  Mr. Sawyer receives $200,000 annually and $7,500 per day for days substantially spent on matters related to our restructuring.
EXHIBIT 10.27
 AMENDED AND RESTATED  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Agreement Date of this Agreement Employer Company Executive
 Original Agreement
   Term
 Term
 Duties
 CEO
 Compensation
 Salary




---



##### 



Annual Salary Board Annual
Salary
 Incentive Compensation Bonus
 Stock Options Options)
 2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Affiliate Exchange Act
 Beneficial Owner
 Person ]
 Benefits
 Expenses
 Compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code; Short-Term Deferral
Exemption Code Short-Term Deferral Date
 4




---



##### 



Termination upon Death or Disability
  Certain Terminations of Employment
 Termination for Cause; Termination of Employment by the Executive without Good
Reason
 Cause
 5




---



##### 



Termination by the Employer without Cause; or by the Executive for Good Reason
 Good Reason
 6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



Invention, Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition
 Inventions and Patents
 Developments
     9




---



##### 



Proprietary Information
 Proprietary Information
  10




---



##### 



Covenant Not to Compete
      Business of the Employer
 11




---



##### 



Other Obligations
 Rights and Remedies upon Breach Restrictive Covenants
 Other Provisions
 Severability
 12




---



##### 



Duration and Scope of Covenants
 Resolution of Differences Over Breaches of Agreement
 Notices
 To the Employer:
    
    Local.com CorporationAttn: Heath Clarke, CEO
One Technology Drive, Building G
Irvine, CA 92618to the Executive:
    
    Scott ReinkeTo the Address on file
With the Company
 Entire Agreement
 Waivers and Amendments
 13




---



##### 



GOVERNING LAW
 Assignment
 Withholding
 Binding Effect
 Counterparts
 Survival
 Headings
 Indemnification; Directors and Officers Insurance
 14




---



##### 



15




---



##### 



EMPLOYER
LOCAL.COM CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporationBy:
    /s/ Heath Clarke
    ,Heath ClarkeChief Executive OfficerEXECUTIVE/s/ Scott ReinkeScott Reinke 16




---



##### 



STATEMENT OF ATTORNEYS FOR EXECUTIVE
   Dated:Attorney for Executive 17




---



##### 



Invention, Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition Agreement
 Exhibit A
  18
No. 52655.

protests 140894-K, etc. (New York).

#### Dextar Fur Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. O. *Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF

X.E.V.,

A CHILD.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00160-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2019DCM2502)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s judgment based on the failure to notify relevant 

tribal authorities under the ICWA and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes no 

other order with respect to costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and Chew, C.J. (Senior Judge)

Chew, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
December 27, 1939

No. 42935.

#### Protests 793209-G, etc., of Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.

Abstract 42727. Application by plaintiff for rehearing granted.
WALLIN CALHOUN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4658

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 12, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

Wallin Calhoun, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 12.1
 GTx, Inc.Computation of Ratio (Deficiency) of Earnings Available to Cover Fixed Charges
 Six Months Ended
    
    
    Year Ended December 31,June 30, 2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Income (loss):Pretax income (loss) from continuing operations (1)
    
    $
    31,398
    
    
    $
    (46,494
    )
    
    $
    (51,780
    )
    
    $
    (40,359
    )
    
    $
    (35,510
    )
    
    $
    (36,839
    )Fixed charges (from below)
    
    
    62
    
    
    
    104
    
    
    
    89
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    32Total income (loss)
    
    
    31,460
    
    
    
    (46,390
    )
    
    
    (51,691
    )
    
    
    (40,324
    )
    
    
    (35,478
    )
    
    
    (36,807
    )Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Estimated interest portion of rent expenses
    
    
    56
    
    
    
    104
    
    
    
    89
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    32Total fixed charges
    
    
    62
    
    
    
    104
    
    
    
    89
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    32Coverage deficiency
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (46,494
    )
    
    $
    (51,780
    )
    
    $
    (40,359
    )
    
    $
    (35,510
    )
    
    $
    (36,839
    )Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    507.4
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
 
 (1)
    
    Pretax income from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30,
2010 includes the recognition as collaboration revenue of all of the remaining $49.9 million of
unamortized revenue that was deferred as of December 31, 2009 related to the Companys global
exclusive license and collaboration agreement (the Collaboration Agreement) with Merck & Co.,
Inc. (Merck), as well as the final payment of $5.0 million of research and development cost
reimbursement that will be received under the Collaboration Agreement from Merck in December 2010, the
accelerated recognition of which resulted from the termination of the Collaboration Agreement in
March 2010.