alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 50521.

#### Protests 41304-K, etc., of Lloyd Mfg. Co. (Providence).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 4.1


NUMBER                                                                SHARES
XXXX                                                                  XXXX

                                  SPECIMEN
                          ALAMOSA (DELAWARE), INC.
                           a Delaware Corporation
       The Corporation is authorized to issue 9,000 Common Shares --
                            Par Value $0.01 each


        This Certifies that XXXX __________________________________________
is the registered holder of X X X X X (XXX)_____________________________
Shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Alamosa (Delaware),
Inc. transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof
in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.


        In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate
Seal to be hereunto affixed this XXXX day of XXXXXX A.D. XXX.



_________________________           SEAL           ___________________________






        For Value Received, _____ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto ______
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________ Shares
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint ___________________________________________________________
Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

        Dated ______________________________
              In presence of

                                               _______________________________

________________________________



                  NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT
             MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE
           FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
             ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
# C_2007059EN.01000301.xml

| 14.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/3

---

Commission Communication on the titles of technical regulations

(2007/C 59/03)

For your information, from March 2007, the titles of drafts notified under Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council will no longer be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

They will instead be published on a weekly basis on the TRIS public website http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/tris/

---
No. 64199.

protest 313656-K (Pembina).

#### Union Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Border Brokerage Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 179, C.D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2007123EN.01000601.xml

| 5.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/6

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping and countervailing measures

(2007/C 123/04)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1), following which no request for a review was received, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping and countervailing measures mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (2) and with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Community (3).

2

3

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ring binder mechanisms | Indonesia | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 976/2002 (OJ L 150, 8.6.2002, p. 1) | 8.6.2007 |
| Ring binder mechanisms | Indonesia | Countervailing duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 977/2002 (OJ L 150, 8.6.2002, p. 17) | 8.6.2007 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Ring binder mechanisms

Indonesia

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 976/2002 (OJ L 150, 8.6.2002, p. 1)

8.6.2007

Ring binder mechanisms

Indonesia

Countervailing duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 977/2002 (OJ L 150, 8.6.2002, p. 17)

8.6.2007

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 22.9.2006, p. 2.

1

(2)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

2

(3)  OJ L 288, 21.10.1997, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).

3

---
No. 57360.

protest 194952-K (New York).

#### Henry Hummel Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Certification of Litigation Trustee Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Information Resources, Inc. Litigation ContingentPayment Rights Trust for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of theirknowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ MONICA  M. WEED |   |
|---------------------|--------|
| Monica M.  Weed     |
| Litigation  Trustee |
| August 12,  2004    |

 

 

This certification accompaniesthe Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by the Registrant for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended.

 

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 819 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act with respect 

to the types of milk offered under the school lunch program, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Ms. STEFANIK (for herself, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mrs. MILLERMEEKS, Mr. GARBARINO, Mr. WILLIAMS of New York, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. 

LANGWORTHY, and Mr. MOLINARO) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act with respect to the types of milk offered under 

the school lunch program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting School Milk 

5 Choices Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 819 IH

1 SEC. 2. TYPES OF MILK OFFERED UNDER THE SCHOOL 

2 LUNCH PROGRAM. 

3 Section 9(a)(2)(A) of the Richard B. Russell National 

4 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(a)(2)(A)) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) by striking clause (ii); 

7 (2) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv); 

8 and 

9 (3) by inserting after clause (i) the following: 

10 ‘‘(ii) shall offer students flavored and 

11 unflavored fluid milk; 

12 ‘‘(iii) may offer students lactose-free 

13 fluid milk; and’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>

Ex 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 333-37914 filed on July 5, 2000, and No. 333-66746 filed on August
3, 2001) of Genius Products, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated
_________, 2002, on our audit of the financial statements of Genius Products,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 2001.


                                         /S/ CACCIAMATTA ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION

                                            CACCIAMATTA ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION

Irvine, California
April __, 2002
January 16, 1943

No. 47928.

Suit 4385.

#### *Waterman Steamship Corp.*v. *United States.*

affirmed Dec. 1, 1942. C. A. D. 223.
Served: April 2, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATE FLIGHT MANAGEMENT, INC.

------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On March 11, 2014, Corporate Flight Management, Inc. (“CFM”), a commuter air carrier,1

requested that the Department register the trade names “Buzz Airways” and “Appalachian Air” 

for use in certain of its air transportation operations.

Part 215 of the Department’s regulations provides that any carrier wishing to use an alternative 

trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further states that the 

Department may register such name after the carrier gives notification to similarly named air 

carriers of the proposed use of the name. In this case, there are no there similarly named air 

carriers.

Since CFM has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of 

the trade names “Buzz Airways” and “Appalachian Air” by CFM for immediate use in its 

operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C., April 2, 2014.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov

 

1 See Order 2014-1-14, issued January 23, 2014.
Attachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR CORPORTATE FLIGHT MANAGEMENT, INC.

ALLEN HOWELL

PRESIDENT

CORPORATE FLIGHT MANAGEMENT INC

276 DOUG WARPOOLE ROAD

SMYRNA TN 37167

SUSAN B JOLLIE

COUNSEL FOR CORPORATE FLIGHT 

MANAGEMENT INC

7503 WALTON LANE

ANNANDALE VA 22003

PETER LYNCH AGC-300

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR 

ENFORCEMENT

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RITA/BTS RTS-42

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICFMION SECTION 

MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

BLANE WORKIE

DOT

ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL

 FOR AVIATION AND PROCEEDINGS

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR THOMAS LUIPERSBECK 

PRINCIPAL OPERATIONS INSPECTOR 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATIION 

NASHVILLE FSDO CE9 

MR ED BLOUNT 

SUPERVISOR 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

NASHVILLE FSDO CE9
(Reap. Dec. 8260)

#### Armour *&*Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 773062.

(Decided November 25, 1953)

*Eugene B. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement set forth in Schedule A hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of canned corned beef imported from Argentina;

> That the issues involved in said appeal for reappraisement are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *United States v. International Commercial Co., Inc. and Armour and Co.,*Reappraisement Decision 8112.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the value or price, at the time of exportation of the involved merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of Argentina in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and covering of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was eleven dollars ($11.00) per case of 48 tins of 12 ounces each, f. o. b. Buenos Aires, less 9.4% for non-dutiable charges.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation of the merchandise here involved, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Argentina.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in *United States v. International Commercial Co., Inc. and Armour and Co.,*Reappraisement Decision 8112, be incorporated in the record in the appeal for reappraisement set forth in the attached schedule, which is submitted for decision on this stipulation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal is abandoned as to any other merchandise listed on the invoices in this appeal for reappraisement.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the canned corned beef here involved, and that such value was $11 per case of 48 tins of 12 ounces each, f. o. b. Buenos Aires, less 9.4 per centum for nondutiable charges.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R O B E R T L . J A R R E T T , J R ., P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. U N I TED STA TES D I STRI CT CO U RT F ORT HE C E NT R AL DI S T R I C T OF C AL I F ORNI A WE S T E RN D I VI S I ON P R O S E C L E R K S O F F I C E , in th e ir o f f ic ia l c ap a c itie s ; e t a l., D efen d an t s. N o. 09- 56032 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 2 4 4 6 - V BF ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia V a l e r i e B a ke rF a i rba nk, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d J une 29, 2010 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an dG R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED JU L 23 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 56032 2 R obe rtL . J a rr e tt , J r . appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s a c t i on f

orf a i l ur e t o e f

f e c ts e rvi c e of

pr oc e s s w i thi n 120 da y s , a s r e qui r e d by F e d e r a l R u le o f

C iv il P r o c e d u r e 4 ( m ) . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w f

o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , P u et t

v. B la n d f o rd , 912 F . 2d 270, 2 7 3 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 0 ) , a n dw e r e v e r s e a n dr e m a n d . T he di s tr i c tc ourta l l ow e d J a rr e ttt o pr oc e e d w i thoutpr e pa y m e ntof f i l i ng f e e s , se e 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( au th o r iz in g f e d e r a l c o u rts to a llo w ap la in tif f to pr oc e e d w i thoutpr e pa y m e ntof f i l i ng f e e s ) , e nt i t l i ng hi m t o ha ve of f i c e r s of the c o u rt is s u e a n ds e rv e a ll p r o c e s s , se e 28 U . S . C . § 1 91 5(d); F ed. R . C i v. P . 4(c) (3); P u e tt , 912 F . 2d a t273. T he di s tr i c tc ourtabus e d i t s di s c r e t i on bydi s m i s s i ng J a rr e tt ’ s r e que s tf

orc ourtof

f i c e r s t o e f

f e c ts e rvi c e a nd the n di s m i s s i ng the a c t i on f o rla c ko f

s e rv ic e . I f

on r e m a nd the di s tr i c tc ourtde t e rm i ne s tha tthe c om pl a i nt s u rv iv e s 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( i) a n d( ii) ( r e q u ir in g th e d is tr ic t c o u rt to d is m is s a n a c tio n f

ile du n d e r§ 1 9 1 5 ( a ) th a t is f r iv o lo u s , m a lic io u s , o rf a ils to s ta te a c l ai m on w hi ch re l i ef

m aybe grant ed), then the courtshou l d p roce ed t o o rder se rvi ce of proces s und er§ 1 91 5(d). J a rr e tt s h a ll b e a rh is o w n c o s ts o n ap p e a l.09- 56032 3 Jarr ett ’ s m ot i on s f

i l ed on O ct ob er13 , 20 09 , and N ov em ber 20, 20 09 , ar e de ni e d. RE V E RS E D a n d RE MAND E D.
(Reap. Dec. 10116)

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., a/c Fadex Commercial Corp. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 13136, etc.

(Decided December 7, 1961)

*William Whywman*for the plaintiffs.

*William B. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Bao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in the schedule of reappraisements attached to this decision and made a part hereof have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That the imported merchandise consists of automobiles, manufactured in and exported from Germany on the dates herein relevant, and described on the invoices as U.S. Isetta or Isetta 300,1 tone (one color) and 2 tones (2 colors) together with accessories and spare parts.

> 2. That on the relevant dates of exportation, there was no foreign, export, or U.S. value, as each of such values is defined in Section 402 (c), (d) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the imported merchandise above described.

> 3. That on the relevant dates of exportation, the proper basis of value of the automobiles above described was the cost of production, as such value is defined in Section 402(f) of said Tariff Act, and as stated in Schedule A hereto attached and made a part hereof.

> 4. That as to the accessories not already included in the cost figures shown in the said schedule and separately appraised, the proper basis of value is the cost of production, which is equal to the value stated on the invoice.

> *5365. That the proper basis of value of the imported spare parts is the cost of production, as defined in Section 402(f), which is as follows:

> Those marked in green ink with the letter “G” are equal to the appraised value.

> Those marked in green ink with the letter “F” are equal to the invoice value.

> Those marked in green ink with the letter “D” are equal to the invoice valueless 6%.

> The said appeals are submitted herewith for decision upon this stipulation and are abandoned as to all items not included and referred to above.

On the agreed facts, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise covered by said appeals and that such values were as follows:

1. For the automobiles covered by said appeals, the values stated in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof.

2. For the accessories not already included in the cost figures shown in the said schedule and separately appraised, the values stated on the invoices.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp.
(the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/S/ JONATHAN H. COHEN                       
|Name: Jonathan H. Cohen Date:
August 5, 2011



1
Exhibit 10.14


 





SHAREHOLDERS REPAYMENT
PLAN


 


The shareholders Quan Ji and Qimei Li hereby
make the following repayment plan in relation to their loans from Anhui Renrenjia Solar Energy Co., Ltd.


 


	Shareholder’s name 	Total amount of the loan

(as of  30/09/2014)	
        Repayment by 31/05/2015

        (40% of the total )
	
        Repayment by 30/06/2015

        (60% of the total )

	Quan Ji 	¥39,848,541.03	¥15,939,416.41	¥23,909,124.62
	 	 	 	 
	Qimei  Li	¥39,571,286.17	¥15,828,514.47	¥23,742,771.7


 


This statement is hereby made.


 





	Signatures: 	Mr. Quan Ji
	 	Mrs. Qimei Li
	 	 
	 	ANHUI RENRENJIA
SOLAR ENERGY CO. LTD







 


 


(official seal)


 


01/12/2014
EXHIBIT 23.2

                                  [LETTER HEAD]



          Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accountant



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of Transax International Limited of our report dated March
24, 2006, except for Note 14 as to which is as of June 26, 2006, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in its annual
report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005 on Form 10-KSB/A.


                                    Moore Stephens, P.C.
                                    Certified Public Accountants

New York, NY
July 7, 2006
No. 55310.

#### S. R. Droescher, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 160285-K (A), etc. (New York).

*375Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.