alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 8272)

#### Morris Gold *v.*United States

Entry No. 11322.

(Decided December 18, 1953)

*Lawrence, Tuttle & Harper (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General *(William J. Vitale,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge;

This is an appeal taken by the consignee in accordance with the provisions of section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for reappraisement of certain lipsticks and compacts, imported from Italy.

When the case was called for trial, counsel for the parties stipulated that the values returned by the appraiser were the correct values for the merchandise; that such values were the prices at the time of exportation at which similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the prinicpal markets of Italy in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States; and that the prices for exportation to the United States were no higher.

On the agreed facts, I find foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the articles here involved, and that such value in each instance was the appraised value.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 52626.

protests 123068-K and 125974-K (New York).

#### Edelson & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
10.1 BianchiEmploymentAgreementAddendum




RENEWAL ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Renewal Addendum No. 1 is made this 17th day of March, 2015, to the Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Stephen M. Bianchi (the “Employee”) and Home Federal Bank, a South Dakota state chartered bank (the “Bank”), dated March 13, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”).  The Board of Directors of the Bank and of HF Financial Corp., the parent company of the Bank, have authorized the Chairman of the Bank’s Board of Directors to execute this Renewal Addendum No. 1 on behalf of the Bank.  


WHEREAS, the term of the Employment Agreement expires on June 30, 2016, unless renewed by mutual agreement of Employee and the Bank; and


WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement may be renewed for not less than one year by providing notice thereof no later than ninety (90) days prior to the end of the then existing term; and


WHEREAS, Employee and the Bank do mutually agree to renew the term of the Employment Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of paragraph 1 of the Employment Agreement, the parties agree as follows:  


1.    The term of the Employment Agreement is hereby renewed and the Employment Agreement shall continue in effect through June 30, 2017.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employee and the Bank have executed this Renewal Addendum No. 1 effective as of the day and year first above written.




EMPLOYEE    HOME FEDERAL BANK 
    
/s/ Stephen M. Bianchi        /s/ Michael M. Vekich     
Stephen M. Bianchi        By: Michael M. Vekich 
        Its: Chairman of the Board
#### ALAJOS TOTH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DR. PAUL GLICKSMAN, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Messrs. Bhanley & Fisher*and *Mr. Raymond M. Tierney, Jr.*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Heller & Lailcs*for the respondent.

April 30, 1968.

Denied.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8294 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a waiver 

of certain criteria with respect to the designation of a critical access hospital. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Mr. VAN ORDEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a waiver of certain criteria with respect to the designation of a critical access hospital. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Healthcare Revi5 talization Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF CERTAIN CRITERIA WITH RESPECT TO 

7 THE DESIGNATION OF A CRITICAL ACCESS 

8 HOSPITAL. 

9 Section 1820(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 1395i–4(c)(2)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8294 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (B), in the matter pre2 ceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘A State may des3 ignate’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subparagraph (F), 

4 a State may designate’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(F) WAIVER OF CERTAIN CRITERIA WITH

8 RESPECT TO THE DESIGNATION OF A CRITICAL

9 ACCESS HOSPITAL.— 

10 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Subject to clause 

11 (ii), in the case of a metropolitan statis12 tical area in which a CMS-accredited facil13 ity (as described in section 103.30(f)(2) of 

14 title 29, Code of Federal Regulations) with 

15 300 beds or fewer has terminated oper16 ations, the State in which metropolitan 

17 statistical area is located may waive the re18 quirements described in subparagraph 

19 (B)(i) with respect to a subsequent facility 

20 located in such metropolitan statistical 

21 area for purposes of designating such facil22 ity as a critical access hospital. 

23 ‘‘(ii) REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED.— 

24 For purposes of clause (i), a subsequent 

25 facility shall— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 8294 IH

1 ‘‘(I) provide not more than 10 

2 beds; 

3 ‘‘(II) meet the requirements de4 scribed in clauses (ii) through (v) of 

5 subparagraph (B); and 

6 ‘‘(III) meet the requirements de7 scribed in section 340B(a)(4)(L)(i) of 

8 the Public Health Service Act.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12831-12832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4999]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,034, TA-W-61,034A, TA-W-61,034B]


American Identity, Inc., Orange City, IA; American Identity, 
Inc., Hawarden, IA; and American Identity, Inc., Marcus, IA; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on February 27, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a 
company official on behalf of workers at American Identity, Inc., 
Orange City, Iowa (TA-W-61,034); Hawarden, Iowa (TA-W-61,034A) and 
Marcus, Iowa (TA-W-61,034B).
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.


[[Page 12832]]


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of March 2007.
 Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-4999 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 10.9


 


Lease Agreement


 


Lessor (hereinafter referred to as Party A)
: Bengbu Boyuanzhiye Co.,Ltd.


 


Lessee (hereinafter referred to as Party B):
Anhui Renrenjia Energy Group


 


Article 1: The premise
is located at Guanzhen quanminchuangyeyuan Benbu city Guzhen country, with the construction floorage of 1139.64 square
meters.


 


Article 2: The lease term
will be from 01( Month)20(Day)2014(Year) to 01 (Month)20(Day)2015 (Year).


 


Article 3: This lease will
be 7000RMB per month.


 


Article 4: Payment of the
lease will be one installment per year, Party B should pay the full amount before January 20h of each year in advance. The
lease should be paid in the form of cash.


 


Article 5: Party A will
bear the cost of utilities such as water,electricity,in the amount of 3000RMB total.


 


Article 6 : This property
is for Business site only.


 


Article 7 : During the
lease term,Party A shall responsible for maintenance of the housing.


 


Article 8: During the lease
term, Party B shall not sublease the house to a third party.


 


Article 9 : Party B shall
pay Party A a deposit of Ten thousands  Yuan from the effective date of this lease.


 


If Party A fail to respond
to the maintenance repair and caused damage to Party B, Party A shall bear for all the cost and penalty.


 


If Party B failed to pay
rent on time, a penalty of outstanding fee will be charged with the rent.


 


Any damage of the property
caused by the subleased third party,Party B shall bear all the cost and penalty.


 


	Lessor :	 	Lessee :
	 	 	 
	2014-01-20	 	2014-01-20
Before the Second Division,

May 26, 1948

No. 52347.

protest 116492-K (El Paso).

#### American Import Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

When the ease was called for trial the protest was submitted upon the official papers. A perusal of same disclosing no error in the action of the collector, the protest was overruled.
#### In the Matter of Charles D. Hastings, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[633 NYS2d 650]

—Mikoll, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

A search of a package being mailed by petitioner, an inmate at Elmira Correctional Facility in Chemung County, revealed that petitioner had improperly used old towels for padding and petitioner was disciplined accordingly. Three months later, a stolen trinket was recalled to have been in the package and, petitioner was again disciplined. Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging the determination that he had possessed the stolen trinket.

The testimony of the correction officer performing the package inspection provided substantial evidence to support the determination *(see, Matter of Bostic v Coughlin,*216 AD2d 766). The fact that there was an extended delay linking the stolen trinket and the one observed in the package mailed by petitioner months earlier, and the circumstances surrounding such linking, merely raised an issue of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see, Matter of Hernandez v LeFevre,*150 AD2d 954, *lv denied*74 NY2d 615; *Matter of Bernacet v Coughlin,*145 AD2d 802, *lv denied*74 NY2d 603).

Not having expressed a desire to call as a witness or otherwise contact the recipient of the package to establish that the package did not contain the trinket, petitioner effectively waived his right to do so *(see, Matter of Colucci v Scully,*173 AD2d 953, 955). It was acknowledged that the trinket was not a topic of the misbehavior report involving the improper use of the towels and, as that issue was not in controversy, there was no error in failing to introduce the report as an exhibit. Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### CELIA REITMAN, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. HYMAN FISHKIN, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

*Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, Mr. Morris Brown*and *Mr. Alan E. Davis*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Schneider & Morgan*and *Mr. Robert E. Monaghan*for the respondents.

March 12, 1968.

Denied.
APR 06 2015

. , ^^ (? ^ i AWtesta, Gterk

£ou*.i »<? Ufe|U< 4exu*\ky ffc>*5 ^*i *& y*i (UJhA-l he, CfaiA*

^s a ^Uppiam^A-l fa' W^ MOf ^ a/a^s Qjb&f** U-01 &?<£-

Mas hfoy foia&A an 6U-rtc&&i 7b Tes+iswiti ~rb -ft? da«*.£ d><T &/*>-

y,r<> CWi£, <%?&. U^z&^ffT, <&»>-> ~72**s £*i)een rt*^i &de 9.<U£&4-

<5a&>lVs-feW dwaJ CiAini% <zf%jA~<gJ/b'fjfi* /ilhtL ^Tltm Sk+fa. Jg£'4/+6th-f

UU|fe* 6o<^vn(^ kos4 "fa« 0*b.»i<SvV-i»<f~. tf£>^t )S5f3 <3>S/^.b/ <&*/i/C

g3£732? ^o;^-0. lJ.£*jJ*» '£& AS S&f Jieft ^ -pie. i^^en

4r,/\ T^x/^s (^io&A^r, ^-W ^c/«* c^/.^S^ ^£ /cTT^3 T>;slk,<L{

ff\jfit\$ {AM\hn\ /Maius Al/*rv ^W<s<$vci<£~ 3<P l^^T^rr-T^n^ej^
vWi*d«*+i^ of A\l ftcii'ffr\<:{ &&><>, £eJe-n<£,., And t**i<\&<%Tes, £*c*f>+ 7* dft&'f

A)*nV>FS&*J'4* &drf> Q/s/fe'^/ dauii dud?. Ma/I hM& fh\ (*<&££,

Gh!)£C&«\U«<?Q.#o/<{ 2o?//>+m /hd&<J 411** 6*TM+?* 7**- <Dr*kic}

Canid- &$ U)*IU/l dawnfy U)lT t <s«P /J#k?/?<> (U&fJUS*. //'Ol. iMf

*3e«-<k&>» ihi$, 73 r*£>6*o 7hz /£-r<d&i *£''• Ap/zfI foci lO://,^

ftndtU*) /0/Ur> hfis /?£/ fedXcJf 4. AN&rttZ Jhrm V%? &£e*i«J*/!-

~7%A<f -fTiz (Uua./fa<P <L/firr7>h*j /Q-ppaak M/te tftd'^c/zcp />r&

(Luid* fiO/J/f*TM s4t*c/*&*o A/(~n u)*^ y<j/ 3^d<±-f*J u^4rl

6^piem^^ \% d*so? #4 J?J.£/Art, &* S^ph'/h^ I 240<Z d^^^l/in

ff£7ke i^rT.'&'&Ts-Uicl d»u£_4 0o.a*\4 7b £kv\£-4-\-e th^L*) leva*

(fe&^&Amor) /On/) Hvfrs (3-dd^An m^rx / OjsJ& 34-.3&I*.

LbjZ, faUn ch>c^^f &n ^Th? d&/' WlcPi$*1 -*r> vXw (\pnl( A*<* rhbtemUjl-

($>^ffil fAtfLJ-h (L&u<y\4<& cm fb£ <&C*$t fll&nj&j ^-&b£t*ftft*i And StpTSrn/)££_•

(jb^ri lOfi/bfi- dz*<7i/% cm iTi? Jk/sf/f)<37)J/*fr 5*1 OAnu^/iy find \j«n£.
V^^nsy\ fin* 7~&tffr <3~o06/un /r\*«\\ C&<$€ ^cfo-ZxD^ siu^»sJ?/c/y<r^

CAcQ Gsu/i-f- h's-fFcj' T" <Tkis <&ilo&*p4*iL hfirS ~V\S ^\Afl.i'z><£,cd(srr^ pfavt'dfj)

facf 7Tl£ 0#*S-j-i'-Mrc->^ find <fht %2^£js>a( i4uJ$ cr*P <fhi§ gjok: <£&&.

S^r\4 US'dl>*hrv\ AnJ&ud AlLh> {*M*<L S-kh*c.

Re: debit y^ of-c<i-fz<n<cT> fhaaugz og'&°,~iz<i?<o<o*

S~rnc&(i/y

/U<s//> !</b X&p&zSd/iz & zp»4iiud &» M- %z p. */zx2 setd&+zx ^66 /&<, /z-4?0

dmtlsJIicli^ 7**f -Ztr, Jac^s fhd 7~h-L Sot? 1/js ^<tb\ (Laua+

Vt&nen Aha Us/is <£)Js er<f' (/frvrj,**/ /2WW-f*s $ &1 .€>%/( 7?l24L£ 75

QD~f7m4 ii cshtf's kp&r) -/J* J/?<is ~?h/)./ -ihs d»h«jf 7^^ -fht Oksz /}A^

bStllfito* Qnd&suJ M^r\ dWjs 7\+\ 7%H djaua-f- "fakers Q/dlas/L /ta£ *4

~ViH Vi&lnltdrv^ o-P Tkxns. ^W?»s//A//^ And/ffiuTS- U3,ih*r* A^dtisrtM

^Eb^s dto^A lo&f <£?riskiW firh.0 U^l-it^ 7b Sh. SW d/fr\ ^6'/ &Ij f-/

Ofill I go&~
#### State v. City of Dunedin, a municipality.

180 So. 24.

En Banc.

Opinion Filed March 31, 1938.

*Chester B.*McCullen, State Attorney, for Appellant;

*Fred T. Peebles*and *Dickenson & Dickenson,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a final decree validating a single issue of refunding bonds to take the place of seven series of bonds previously issued by the Town and City of Dunedin. It is contended that the provisions of the issuing resolution are not sufficiently definite to bind the homesteads in the City if they can be bound for the refunding bonds, that the territory of the City has several times been changed and that the refunding bonds being against territory different from the territory securing the original bonds, the security is different and that consequently the refunding bonds cannot be issued without an approving vote of the people.

*858We have carefully examined each of these contentions and find them to be without merit. It further appears from the record that the refunding bonds were issued in compliance with the requirements of the law and being so, the final decree appealed from is affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announces a meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Electronic Records Archives (ACERA). The committee serves as a deliberative body to advise the Archivist of the United States on technical, mission, and service issues related to the Electronic Records Archives (ERA). This includes, but is not limited to, advising and making recommendations to the Archivist on issues related to the development, implementation, and use of the ERA system. 

*Date of Meeting:*                         April 4-5, 2007.                     

*Time of Meeting:*                         9 a.m.-4 p.m.                     

*Place of Meeting:*                         700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20408-0001.                     

                        This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the Electronic Records Archives Program at                         *era.program@nara.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda 

    - Opening Remarks
    - Approval of Minutes
    - Committee Updates
    - Activity Reports
    - Adjournment

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lewis Bellardo, Deputy Archivist of the United States and Chief of Staff; (301) 837-1600. 

Dated: March 15, 2007. 

Mary Ann Hadyka, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-5068 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
1

Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Rich Goodwyn <rich@orionaerial.com>

Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 7:28 AM

To: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Subject: Request for Information - FAA-2015-2336 (Phantom Series Clarification)

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Mr Ngo,

Thanks for the call yesterday.   Below is the information I hope you need to complete my

petition.  Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Very Respectfully,

Rich

Rich Goodwyn

Chief Pilot

Orion Aerial Solutions

703‐606‐3978

rich@orionaerial.com

www.orionaerial.com

Because perspective matters.

Phantom Series means:

Phantom 3 Professional

Phantom 3 Advanced

Phantom 3 Standard

Phantom 2 Vision +

Phantom 2 Vision

Phantom 2

Phantom 1
Before the First Division,

December 6, 1960

No. 64940.

#### Colonial Bead Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/3413, etc. (New York).

*388Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass stones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59105, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EX 31-1

CERTIFICATION

I, Arthur Viola, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of INFe-Human
Resources, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information;

and

b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date: July 14, 2004

/s/  ARTHUR VIOLA
________________________
Arthur Viola
Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director
446 A.2d 696

#### Johnson, Appellant v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. Mitchell, Appellant v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

Argued November 6, 1981.

Stanley B. Gruber, for appellants; Edward V. Cattell, Jr., for appellee.

Before SPAETH, BECK and LIPEZ, JJ.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4960]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[AAG/A Order No. 008-2007]


Privacy Act of 1974; Removal of a System of Records Notice

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 
552a), the Department of Justice (DOJ), United States Marshals Service 
(USMS) is removing the published notice of a Privacy Act system of 
records: ``Justice/USM-003, United States Marshals Service Prisoner 
Transportation System,'' last published in the Federal Register on 
September 6, 1991, at 56 FR 44101.
    The notice of USM-003 is obsolete, as the records for USM-003 were 
incorporated into ``Justice/USM-005, U.S. Marshals Service Prisoner 
Processing and Population Management/Prisoner Tracking System (PPM/
PTS)'' when USM-005 was first published as a new Privacy Act system of 
records on February 3, 1992, at 57 FR 4059. USM-005 has been 
subsequently updated.
    Therefore, the notice of ``Justice/USM-003, United States Marshals 
Service Prisoner Transportation System'' is removed from the 
Department's listing of Privacy Act systems of records notices, 
effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: March 8, 2007.
Lee J. Lofthus,
Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-4960 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-04-P