alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4467]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden 
(Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer 
Burden (Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, April 5, 2007 from 1 p.m. ET.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden 
(Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, April 5, 2007 from 1 p.m. ET via a telephone conference call. 
If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please 
call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write Sallie Chavez, TAP 
Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. 
Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate 
in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Sallie 
Chavez. Ms. Chavez can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or 
post comments to the Web site:  http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include: Various IRS issues.

     Dated: March 7, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E7-4467 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 13.2

Certification pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Kappa Holding B.V. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H. Wagter, Chief Financial Officer/Managing Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:



|Date: June 27, 2005 |  |        |  |                                          
|------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------
|                    |  | By:    |  | /s/H. WAGTER                             
|                    |  | Name:  |  | H. Wagter                                
|                    |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer/Managing Director

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a disclosure document

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report of GEOPHARMA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Carol Dore-Falcone                           
|Carol Dore-Falcone                               
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|June 26, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         3,257
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,257
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,613
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       300
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,656)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (4,356)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,577)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,577)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.8


 


Rental Agreement


 


Lessor: Bengbu Boyuanzhiye Co., Ltd.


 


Lessee: Anhui Renrenjia Solar energy Co., Ltd.


 


		1.	The rental area is located in the people’s industrial park Guzhen County, the total area
is 9500 square meters.



		2.	The leasing term is from Feb 01, 2014 to Feb 01, 2015.



		3.	The lessee can use the leasing area for free during the lease term.



		4.	The lessee shall pay for all the electricity and water charges every month during the lease term.



		5.	The purpose of the rental area is for solar energy equipment manufacture.



		6.	The lessee shall be responsible for all the maintenance and repairmen cost of the rental area.



		7.	Without the written consent of the lessor, the lessee can not lend the area to third party.



		8.	If the lessee violates this agreement and lend the area to the third party, the lessee shall be
responsible to pay for all the damages.



  


	Lessor: Bengbu Boyuanzhiye Co., Ltd.	 	Lessee: Anhui Renrenjia Solar Energy Co., Ltd.
	 	 	 
	Date: Feb 01, 2014	 	Date: Feb 01, 2014
#### MARY BERGEN, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. VIRGINIA KOPPENAL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. WALL TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 97 *N. J. Super.*265.

*Messrs. Carton, Nary, Witt & Arvanitis*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Milton Yormark*and *Mr. Leslie S. Kohn*for the respondents.

January 16, 1968.

Granted.
Adams, Kevin (OSJf r;: 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Bobby Hans <bobbyhons@hawaii.rr.com> 

Monday{ July 08{ 2013 9:40 PM 

i j. CJ ~; EAS (OST) 

Subject: Fwd: WAIMEA-KOHALA AIR SERVICE I ONGOING SAGA OF PACIFIC WINGS LACK OF 

SERVICE 

THIS HORROR STORY OF PACIFIC WINGS CONTINUING THEIR POOR SERVICE 

CONTINUES, WHICH SHOULD SHOW YOU THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BID THE 

KAMUELA/ KOHALA ROUTE. OUR KIDS AND GRAND KIDS HAD CONFIRMED FLIGHTS TO 

KAMUELA FROM MAUL TWO KIDS ARRIVED SAT. AND TODAY MON 7/8/13 THEIR PARENTS 

WERE SCHEDULED TO ARRIVE. WITHOUT ANY WARNING, OUR CHILDREN AND TWO OTHER 

GRANDKIDS ARRIVED AT THE MAUl AIRPORT TO FLY TO KAMUELA, WHEN THEY WERE TOLD 

THE FLIGHT AND ALL OTHERS THROUGH SATURDAY WERE CANCELLED. THIS LEFT THEM TO 

FEND FOR THEMSELVES TO MAKE OTHER ARRANGEMENTS. THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER CASES I 

OF THIS LACK OF RESPONSIBILITY BY THIS "FLY BY NITE" SHODEY AIRLINE;EXCUSE THE 

PUN. THIS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE, AND THE ONLY WA Y1IS TO KEEP THEM 

FROM BIDDING THIS ROUTE OR ANY OTHER IN HA WAil. ROBERT HONS 

Begin forwarded message: 

From: Bobby Hons <bobbyhons@hawaii.rr.com> 

Date: June 21, 2013 3:35:42 PM HST 

To: eas@dot.gov 

Subject: WAIMEA-KOHALA AIR SERVICE 

ALOHA, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION; I AM WRITING YOU IN SUPPORT OF 

MOKULELE AIRLINES SERVICING OUR WONDERFUL COMMUNITY WITH AIR "SERVICE" TO 

THE OTHER ISLANDS. AT THE SAME TIME I WOULD BE REMISS IN NOT TAKING YOU FOLKS AT 

THE DOT TO TASK FOR LETTING PACIFIC WINGS CONTINUE TO RIP OFF THE SYSTEM WHERE 

THEY WERE ABLE TO CONTINUE RECEIVING FUNDS UNDER FALSE PRETENSES OF HAVING 

AIR SERVICE THAT WAS NON EXISTENT FOR 6 YRS .. I THINK THEY SHOULD BE REMOVED 

FROM THE BIDDING FOR THIS CONTRACT. ALSO WE WERE ONLY AWARE OF THIS MOVE OF 

OPENING BIDDING FOR THESE ROUTES ON A 6/20/13, IN AN ARTICLE IN THE NEWSPAPER, 

WHICH WAS THE LAST DAY FOR COMMUNITY INPUT. NEVER THE LESS, THIS MUCH NEEDED 

SERVICE HAS BEEN OVERLOOKED FOR TOO LONG, AND WILL BE MUCH 

APPRECIATED. MAHALO ROBERT C HONS --WAIMEA RESIDENT 

1
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Form 10-QSB Certification

 

I, Thomas E. Yott, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CalWestBancorp;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             (Intentionally Omitted)

 

c)              Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

d)             Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 12, 2003 | **/s/ Thomas E. Yott**      |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                    | **Thomas E. Yott**          |
|                    | **Chief Executive  Office** |
|                         |                             |  |

 

----
#### Anthony J. Caruso et al., Respondents, v Russell P. Le Frois Builders, Inc., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[635 NYS2d 553]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Matter of Laborers Inti. Union v Shevlin-Manning, Inc.,*147 AD2d 977). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J.—Structure Damage Award.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
# C_2007131EN.01000401.xml

| 13.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/4

---

Final report of the Hearing Officer in case COMP/M.4215 — Glatfelter/Crompton Assets

(pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision (2001/462/EC, ECSC) of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision (2001/462/EC, ECSC) of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(2007/C 131/04)

On 4 April 2006 Germany requested a referral of the case to the Commission pursuant to Article 22(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Merger Regulation). In accordance with Article 22(2) of the Merger Regulation the Commission informed the competent authorities of the other Member States and the undertakings concerned of the request. The referral request was joined by the United Kingdom. On 15 May 2006 the Commission decided to accept the request to examine the concentration and informed the Member States and the undertakings of its decision.

Merger Regulation

Subsequently, on 16 August 2006, the Commission received a notification of the proposed concentration by which P.H. Glatfelter Company acquires sole control of the Lydney Business of J.R. Crompton Ltd in administration, by way of purchase of assets.

After examining the notification the Commission concluded that the notified transaction fell within the scope of the Merger Regulation and that it raised serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and the functioning with the EEA Agreement. Accordingly, on 20 September 2006, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in accordance with Article 6.1(c) of the Merger Regulation.

Following an in-depth market investigation carried out by the Commission services it was concluded that the proposed transaction would not significantly impede effective competition in the common market or a substantial part of it, in particular as a result of the creation or strengthening of a dominant position, and is therefore compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement. Accordingly, no Statement of Objections was sent to the parties.

No queries or submission have been made to the Hearing Officer by the parties or any other third party. The case does not call for any particular comments as regards the right to be heard.

Brussels, 7 December 2006.

Karen WILLIAMS

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRET ALLEN PETRICK,

Defendant.

CIV S-04-2430 FCD PAN PS

ORDER

—NFN—

Defendant Bret Allen Petrick is ordered to appear before

this court at 9 a.m., Wednesday, June 15, 2005, in Courtroom #25. 

The U.S. Marshal is directed personally to serve this order upon

defendant.

So ordered.

Dated: June 8, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02430-FCD-PAN Document 21 Filed 06/08/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Metalink Ltd. (the
"Company") for the period ending December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Tzvika
Shukhman, Chief Executive Officer & Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 29, 2003




/s/  Tzvika Shukhman
Tzvika Shukhman
Chief Executive Officer &
Chairman of the Board


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Metalink Ltd. and will be retained
by Metalink Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Henry Foltz, *Appellant, v.*Robert Patterson and Otis Patterson, *Respondents.*

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by Smith, P. J.; Haight, J., not sitting.
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Monica M. Weed certify that:

 

1.          I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Information Resources, Inc. LitigationContingent Payment Rights Trust;

 

2.          Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.          Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.          The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15eand 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such internal control over financialreporting to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.          The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| /s/  MONICA M. WEED |   |
|---------------------|--------|
| Monica  M. Weed     |
| Litigation  Trustee |
| May  4, 2005        |

 

 

1

----
(Reap. Dec. 10148)

#### Melvin W. Peyser, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 953045, etc.

(Decided January 23, 1962)

*Barnes, Richardson & CoVburn*for the plaintiff.

*William S. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule for decision upon stipulation reading as follows:

> 1. That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof cover certain footwear, the uppers of which are composed in chief value of rayon with soles composed wholly or in chief value of India rubber, and that said footwear was appraised under Section 402a (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> *5242. That at the time of exportation of the imported merchandise no domestic manufacturer offered like or similar merchandise for sale and like or similar merchandise was not manufactured or produced in the United States.

> 3. That on or about the date of exportation, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the invoice unit prices less ocean freight and marine insurance premium as noted on the invoices, such prices including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States.

> 4. That on or about the date of exportation, the foreign value or such value as defined in Section 402a(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, was no higher.

On the agreed facts, I find that export value, as defined in section 402a (d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the footwear involved and that such value, in each instance, is as set forth in paragraph 3 of the stipulation, quoted above.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 65569.

#### J. G. Philen, Jr., Company *v.*United States,

protest 59/25757 (Laredo).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Innovaro, Inc.:

We have issued our reports dated April 11, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets, statement of operations, changes
in equity and cash flows included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 of Innovaro, Inc. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File
No. 333-165859) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-168318, 333-168319 and 333-117311), of Innovaro, Inc.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ PENDER NEWKIRK & COMPANY
|                            
|Tampa, Florida              
|April 19, 2012