alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report of GEOPHARMA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the three period ended March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Carol Dore-FalconeCarol Dore-FalconeVice President and Chief Financial OfficerJune 29, 2006
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, John R Signorello, Chief Executive Officer and Chief financial officer of
IceWEB Inc. certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of IceWEB, Inc.

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
          material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
          cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
          this annual report.

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
          and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
          for the registrant and have:

          a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
               material information relating to the registrant, including its
               consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
               those entities particularly during the period in which this
               annual report is being prepared;

          b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
               controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
               filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
               effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
               our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
          registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
          board of directors: (or persons performing the equivalent functions)

          a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
               internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
               ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
               and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
               weaknesses in internal controls, and

          b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
               other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
               internal controls.

Date: January 18, 2005                  By: /s/ John R. Signorello
                                            John R. Signorello,
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                            Financial officer
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: 7/23 /14 TO: C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: Michael Gordon , EPA Region 3 SUBJECT: 7/23 /2014 Meeting with the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and

Environmental Control Regarding Proposed C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A conference call was held between EPA and the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control on July 23 , 2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.
**ATTENDEES** Howard Hoffman , Office of General Counsel Nathan Topham , Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Diana Esher, Air Protecti on Division Pat Egan , Air Protection Division Emily L inn , Air Protection Division Mike Gordon, Air Protection Division David Risley , Office of Atmospheric Programs Bill Stevens , Office of Atmospheric Programs Matt Clouse , Office of Atmospheric Programs Chris Sherry , Office of Atmospheric Programs Jim Ketcham

- Colwill , Office of Policy Anal ys is and Review Juan Santiago , Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards David Solomon , Office of Air Qualit y Planning and Standards Brian Fisher , Office of Atmospheric Programs Joe Bry son , Office of Atmospheric Programs Ali Mirzakhalili , DNREC Ron Amirikian , DNREC Valerie Gray , DNREC
Before the Third Division,

June 24, 1938

No. 38890.

#### Protest 873991-G of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the merchandise consists of dolls which were not permanently marked with the name of the country of origin and that the cartons in which the dolls were packed were not marked. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Simmons, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 582]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), rendered December 8, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was tried for the commission of three robberies. Within 15 days of his arraignment, he was served with a notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 as to the People’s intention to offer identification evidence at trial. Insofar as relevant to this appeal, the notice as to complainant Sybil Butler indicated that she would testify as to lineup identifications in addition to her crime scene observations. As a result of the disclosure of *Rosario*material prior to the *Wade*hearing, the defendant learned that Ms. Butler had also identified his picture from a photographic array. The defendant moved to preclude all of Ms. Butler’s identification testimony at trial due to the omission of any reference to the photographic identification from the People’s notice pursuant to CPL 710.30. The Supreme Court denied the application. We agree.

The People’s notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 advised the defendant that Ms. Butler would testify at trial as to corporeal identifications at the crime scene and during lineups. The *Wade*hearing did include inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the photographic identification as well as the lineup and crime scene viewings. The court concluded that none of the *485identification procedures were unduly suggestive, and the defendant does not challenge that ruling on this appeal. Inasmuch as the People’s notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 promptly advised the defendant, within 15 days after arraignment, of the People’s intention to offer at trial testimony concerning the lineup and crime scene identifications, the People discharged their statutory obligations (CPL 710.30 [1], [2]; *People v Mata,*220 AD2d 693; *People v Smith,*149 Misc 2d 998, *affd on other grounds*190 AD2d 701). Moreover, contrary to the defendant’s contention, preclusion of all identification testimony would be an inappropriate remedy for the People’s failure to include in their notice reference to the photographic identification procedure *(see, People v Tatum,*205 AD2d 397; *see. also, People v Mata, supra).*Indeed, since the defendant was provided with the notice to which he was statutorily entitled, without undue delay, and since he has failed to demonstrate that the Supreme Court incorrectly concluded that the photographic identification procedure was not unduly suggestive and that it did not taint subsequent identification procedures, we find that the omission from the CPL 710.30 notice of the photographic identification did not entitle him to preclusion of all of Ms. Butler’s identification testimony.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Before the Second Division,

May 13, 1958

No. 61921.

#### Addicalco Corporation of America *v.*United States,

protest 234528-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of key-driven calculating machines the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Plus Computing Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C. C. P. A. 160, C. A. D. 655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

The Water Cycle - USGS Water Science School

LinksGlossaryHelp

      - Home
      - Water Basics
      - Water Properties
      - Water Cycle (Adults)
      - Water Cycle (Kids)
      - Surface Water
      - Groundwater
      - Water Quality
      - Water Use
      - Activities
      - Photos
      - Q&A
      - Teachers
      - Contact

 Back to previous page

Downloads:- PDF  (838mm x 610mm - 2 Mb) 
- JPG  (432mm x 279mm - 0.4 Mb) 
- JPG  (poster - 2.5 Mb)
Kolobeh Cody pre Keti
Geologická služba Spojených štátov (USGS) a Organizácia OSN pre vý	živu a poĺnohospodárstvo (FAO) vytvorili pre deti a žiakov základných škôl schému kolobehu vody.

Back to:Kolobeh vody (English).

To view PDF files, the latest version of Adobe Reader (free of charge) or similar software is needed.

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |			U.S. Geological Survey                        	URL: http://water.usgs.gov/edu/watercycle-kids-slovakian.html	Page Contact Information: Howard Perlman	Page Last Modified: Friday, 02-Dec-2016 12:52:45 EST
#### E. & K. AGENCY, INC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. GEORGE W. VAN DYKE, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

*Mr. Alan C. Sugarman*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Parsons, Gamona, Blair & Warren*and *Messrs. Patterson, Cooper & Coleman*for the respondents.

May 28, 1968.

Denied.
Before the Second Division,

July 19, 1939

No. 41837.

#### Protest 939189-G of Rosenbluth Bros. & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cotton tablecloths used at the service of meals, and not upholstery, the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 923 was sustained.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHUNYU HU,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-70125

Agency No. A088-112-410

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA Circuit Judges.

Chunyu Hu, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

FILED

MAY 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-70125

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations created by the Real ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034,

1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination

based on an omission from his written application of any mention that police were

looking for him at his home, and on the IJ’s negative assessment of Hu’s

demeanor. See Zamanov v. Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 973-74 (9th Cir. 2011)

(omission cast doubt on petitioner’s credibility); Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d

1147, 1151 (9th Cir. 1999) (“special deference” given to credibility determinations

based on demeanor). Accordingly, in the absence of credible testimony, Hu’s

asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d

1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Because Hu’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony found not credible

and he does not point to any evidence that shows it is more likely than not he will

face torture if returned to China, his CAT claim also fails. See id. at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
***Exhibit 31.1***

* *

Certification of Litigation Trustee Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Information Resources, Inc. Litigation ContingentPayment Rights Trust for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of theirknowledge:

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ JOSEPH  P. DURRETT |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Joseph P.  Durrett     |
| Litigation  Trustee    |
| May 24, 2004           |

 

This certification accompaniesthe Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by the Registrant for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended.

 

1

----
Exhibit 99.4

               STATEMENT UNDER OATH OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
       REGARDING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS

I, Dennis M. O'Connor, state and attest that:

(1)  To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the covered reports of
     M.B.A. Holdings, Inc., and, except as corrected or supplemented in a
     subsequent covered report:

     o    no covered report contained an untrue statement of a material fact as
          of the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
          report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as of the date on
          which it was filed); and

     o    no covered report omitted to state a material fact necessary to make
          the statements in the covered report, in light of the circumstances
          under which they were made, not misleading as of the end of the period
          covered by such report (or in the case of a report on Form 8-K or
          definitive proxy materials, as of the date on which it was filed).

(2)  I have reviewed the contents of this statement with the Company's Audit
     Committee.

(3)  In this statement under oath, each of the following, if filed on or before
     the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

     o    Annual Report on Form 10-K of M.B.A. Holdings, Inc. for the year ended
          October 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
          File Number 1-9183,

     o    all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all definitive
          proxy materials of M.B.A. Holdings, Inc. filed with the Commission
          subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K identified above; and

     o    any amendments to any of the foregoing.

By: /s/ Dennis M. O'Connor
    -------------------------------
    Dennis M. O'Connor
    January  22, 2003

                                       Subscribed and sworn to before me
                                       This 22nd day of January 2003.

                                       /s/ Shelly Beesley
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Notary Public

                                       My Commission Expires:
                                       September 30, 2003
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**


CERTIFICATION
      OF CUSTODIAN


In
      connection with the Annual Report of *Turner
      Valley Oil & Gas, Inc.* .,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
      2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Christopher
      Paton-Gay ,
      Sole
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      October 31, 2005




/s/Christopher
          Paton-Gay
 Christopher
            Paton-Gay
 president/director/Sole
          Officer
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

Douglas C. Wride, Chief Financial Officer ofWebsense, Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K ofWebsense, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.

 

2. The information contained in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Websense, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Websense, Inc. for the period covered by the Annual Report.

 

 
| Dated:  March 12, 2004 |   |                     |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                        |   |                     |
|                        |   |                     |
|                        | By:    | /s/ DOUGLAS  C. WRIDE    |   |
|                        |   | Douglas C.  Wride        |
|                        |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Websense, Inc. and will be retained by Websense, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.This written statement accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is notdeemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
(November 9, 1995)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerry Hill, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 153]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Sheridan, J.), rendered March 8, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Observations by an experienced police officer of defendant repeatedly directing drug buyers to sellers, and occasionally receiving cash from the sellers after they completed the transactions provided the police with probable cause to arrest defendant *(People v McRay,*51 NY2d 594).

Defendant’s remaining claims are waived by operation of his guilty plea *(People v Taylor,*65 NY2d 1). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Tom, JJ.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Tamarack  Ventures,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  October 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


Date:  December 15, 2004


/s/ Robert Reukl
----------------------------------
Robert Reukl, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Annie Mae McNiel v. State.

181 So. 888.

Opinion Filed June 8, 1938.

*W. P. Chavous,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Tyrus A. Nor-wood,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

*656Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error being convicted of murder in the second degree under an indictment charging murder in the first degree, brings up the record for review on writ of error.

The only question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict and judgment.

On a careful consideration of the record, we find the evi- ' dence was ample and that no reversible error is made to appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.