T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T Z HI DO NG Z HU , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 71535 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 345- 836 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 29, 2010 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an dG R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Z hi do ng Z hu , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f C hi na, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order s um m ar i l y di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s ( “ IJ ”) deci si on denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen rem ov al pr oc e e di ngs c onduc t e d i n abs e nt i a . O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by 

# FI LED JU L 19 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 71535 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . R e v ie w in g f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , P er ezv. Mukasey , 516 F . 3d 770, 773 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , w e de nyi n partand di s m i s s i n partthe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. T he IJdi d n otabuse hi s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng Z hu ’ s m ot i on t o reopen be c aus e w r i tt e n not i c e of the he ar i ng w a s m a i l e d t o Z hu and t o hi s c ouns e l of r e c or d, and the m ot i on w a s unt i m e l yf i l e d thr e e y e ar s a f

t e rthe i s s uanc e of

the A p r il 1 3 , 2 0 0 4 , in ab s e n tiao r d e r . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 23 (b)( 4)(i i ). T he I Ja l s o di d notabus e hi s di s c r e t i on i n de t e rm i ni ng the e vi de nc e of re l i gi ou s per se cut i on w as i nsuffi ci entt o est abl i sh a s ho w i ng of changed cou ntry cond i t i on s i n C hi na, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 23( b) ( 4) ( i ) , and tha te vi de nc e of s mu g g l e r s ’ th r e a t s w a s i n s u f f i c i e n tt o e s t ab l i s h p r i maf a c i e e l i g i b i l i tyf

o ra s y l u m, w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l, an dr e lie f

u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e , se e Mendez- G ut i errez v . G on zales , 4 4 4 F .3 d1 1 6 8 , 1 1 7 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) ( p r im af a c ie el i gi bi l i ty i s e st abl i shed “ w here the evi dence re veal s are as on abl e l i kel i ho od that th e s ta tu to ryr e qu ir e m e n ts f o rr e lie f h a v e b e e n s a tis f

ie d ” ) . W e la c kju r is d ic tio n to c o n s id e rZ h u ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e I Jin c o rr e c tly d e te rm in e dth a t Z h uw a s r e m o v ab le a s c h ar g e db e c au s e Z h uf a ile dto e x h au s t th is c o n te n tio n b e f

o r e th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ) ( g e n e r a llyr e qu ir in g e x h au s tio n o f c la im s b e f

o r e th e B I A ) .08- 71535 3 W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w Z hu’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe I Js houl d ha ve in v o k e dh is s u as p o n te au th o r ityto r e o p e n h is p r o c e e d in g s . Se e Eki m i a n v . I NS , 30 3 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 59 (9th C i r. 20 02 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.