alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Required Monitoring, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for Boilers ID U1B and U2B

Boiler ID Pollutant Monitoring Reporting Recordkeeping

U1B PM EPA Method 5/17 Stack Test, 

CAM using Opacity and ESP 

secondary current and Voltages

Report CAM excursions 

and excess emissions, 

semiannual compliance 

certification

Keep records of all 

monitoring data until year 

2020

SO2 Continuous Emission Monitor Report Excess 

emissions, semiannual 

compliance 

certification

Keep records of all 

monitoring data until year 

2020

CO Continuous Emission Monitor Report Excess 

emissions, semiannual 

compliance 

certification

Keep records of all 

monitoring data until year 

2020

U2B PM EPA Method 5/17 Stack Test, 

Opacity and ESP secondary 

current and Voltages

Report CAM excursions 

and excess emissions, 

semiannual compliance 

certification

Keep records of all 

monitoring data until year 

2020

SO2 Continuous Emission Monitor Report Excess 

emissions, semiannual 

compliance 

certification

Keep records of all 

monitoring data until year 

2020

CO Continuous Emission Monitor Report Excess 

emissions, semiannual 

compliance 

certification

Keep records of all 

monitoring data until year 

2020

SRP Coronado Generating Station
#### 155th Street and 8th Avenue Realty Corp., Appellant, v National Casualty Co. et al., Respondents.

[635 NYS2d 1]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered July 14,1994, which, *inter alia,*granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of denying the motions to dismiss with respect to the third, sixth and seventh causes of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff insured’s causes of action against defendant insurer for breach of contract, a declaratory judgment that the incident arose from a covered peril, and failure to give notice of termination were properly dismissed as barred by the clear and unambiguous two-year period of limitations contained in the policy. However, that contractual limitation period should not have been applied to the claims against defendant brokers, who were not party to the policy and who are therefore subject to lengthier statutory limitations. To impose liability on the insurer, on the theory that it was a known principal of the brokers, would circumvent the contractual limitation period, and plaintiff’s attempt to do so should accordingly be rejected. Finally, insofar as this issue may still be pertinent in the case, it was error summarily to determine that the loss was caused by a burglary (for which the policy did not provide coverage), as opposed to vandalism (which was a covered peril), since this issue of fact was evident from the face of the police report.

Upon reargument the unpublished decision and order entered on July 6, 1995 (Appeal No. 55427) is recalled and vacated and a new decision and order substituted in place thereof decided simultaneously with this motion. Concur— Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1506]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 126, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand and reorganize the zone in the Reno, Nevada, area, within the Reno Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 24-2006; filed 6/14/06);

                    WHEREAS, notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (71 FR 35611, 6/21/06) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

WHEREAS, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby orders:

The application to expand and reorganize FTZ 126 is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and further subject to a sunset provision that would terminate authority on March 31, 2012, for any of the proposed sites (Sites 4-13) that have not been activated under FTZ procedures before that date.

                    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th                     day of March 2007.                

David M. Spooner,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-5077 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
EXHIBIT 32(a)


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.
for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, I, Martin S. Lapera, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.


/s/ Martin S. Lapera
-------------------------------------
Martin S. Lapera
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 26

th, 2014.

GCF-1001/2014 – 1/1

GNS/ra

EMBRAER S.A.

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2.170

12227-901 - S.J. dos Campos - SP

Brasil

Fone: (12) 3927-0544

Fax: (12) 3927-1184

PC: 179 US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Subject: EMB-550 - FAA Type Validation

Request to cancel the petition to the Exemption from 14 CFR 25.1317(a) 

Amdt. 25-127

EMBRAER respectfully submits this request to cancel the petition for a time-limited 

exemption for the EMB-550, according reference letter no. GCF-1939/2013, which is 

requesting a time-limited relief from powerplant control system requirements 14 CFR 

25.1317(a) amdt. 25-127. This process is located in docket no. FAA-2013-1093 at 

regulations.gov.

Best Regards,

Sérgio Augusto Viana de Carvalho

Airworthiness Director

c.c.: ANAC - GPC EMB-550
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,313] 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Fairystone Fabrics, Burlington, North Carolina. The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. 

*TA-W-60,313; Fairystone Fabrics, Burlington, North Carolina (March 1, 2007).*

Signed at Washington, DC this 6th day of March 2007. 

Ralph Dibattista, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E7-4575 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4658 

To provide for the ongoing presence of certain structures at the Table Rock 

Lake project. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2024 

Mr. SCHMITT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To provide for the ongoing presence of certain structures 

at the Table Rock Lake project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MISSOURI AND ARKANSAS. 

4 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

5 (1) ABANDONMENT.—The term ‘‘abandon6 ment’’ means, with respect to an eligible structure, 

7 the allowance of the structure to come into a state 

8 of disrepair without the demonstrated intent to re9 pair by the owner. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4658 IS

1 (2) ELIGIBLE STRUCTURE.—The term ‘‘eligible 

2 structure’’ means a privately owned sewer and septic 

3 system— 

4 (A) for which a license for a right-of-way 

5 has been provided by the Secretary of the Army 

6 and is in effect on the date of enactment of this 

7 Act; 

8 (B) that is located on fee land or land sub9 ject to a flowage easement; and 

10 (C) that does not impact the reservoir level 

11 or pose a failure risk to the dam of the Table 

12 Rock Lake project. 

13 (3) FEE LAND.—The term ‘‘fee land’’ means 

14 the land acquired in fee title by the United States 

15 for the Table Rock Lake project. 

16 (4) TABLE ROCK LAKE PROJECT.—The term 

17 ‘‘Table Rock Lake project’’ means the Table Rock 

18 Lake project of the Corps of Engineers, located in 

19 Missouri and Arkansas, authorized as one of the 

20 multipurpose reservoir projects in the White River 

21 Basin by section 4 of the Act of June 28, 1938 (52 

22 Stat. 1218). 

23 (b) PRESENCE OF ELIGIBLE STRUCTURES.—The 

24 Secretary of the Army shall permit the ongoing presence 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4658 IS

1 of an eligible structure at the Table Rock Lake project 

2 until— 

3 (1) the abandonment of the eligible structure by 

4 the holder of a license for right-of-way for the struc5 ture; 

6 (2) the failure of the eligible structure; or 

7 (3) the replacement of the eligible structure. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, David E. Tether, Chief Executive Officer of Solomon Technologies, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/    DAVID E. TETHERDavid E. Tether Chief Executive Officer May 20, 2004
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


Loan Agreement









THIS AGREEMENT made on October 17, 2014







BETWEEN:


 


Illumitry Corp., Ayasa 53, Yerevan


Armenia, 0015 ("Corporation")







OF THE FIRST PART


 


 


AND:


 


Arusyak Sukiasyan, Ayasa 53, Yerevan


Armenia, 0015 ("Arusyak")







OF THE SECOND PART


 


WHEREAS:


 


1) Corporation requires funding in connection with business operations;


2) Arusyak has agreed to loan US$30,000 (the "Loan") to Corporation, on certain terms and conditions contained herein;


 


NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that for and in consideration of the sum TEN DOLLARS ($10.00), and other goods and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


a. Arusyak hereby agrees to loan US$30,000 (the "Loan") to Corporation concurrent with the execution of the Agreement;


b. Loan funds advanced shell be non-interest bearing, secured and payable upon demand.


c. Any additional funds that Arusyak loans to Corporation subsequent to this Agreement shell be subject to the same terms as this Agreement, unless otherwise agreed in writing.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective hands, both as of the day and year first above written.


 


Arusyak Sukiasyan / Illumitry Corp.


 


Authorized Signature


 


 


/s/ Arusyak Sukiasyan            


 


Date: October 17, 2014
SCALE 1:24,000

BARRE QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-I

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Barre Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by Janet R. Stone

2013

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1969.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Massachusetts

Geological Survey.

Geology mapped by F.D. Larsen in 1982 (unpublished).

Bedrock outcrop areas are from Tucker (1977).

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 11 of 24)

(P

E

TER

S

HA

M)

(WA

C

H

U

S

E

T

T

M

O

U

N

TAIN)

(NORTH BROOKFIELD)

(TEMPLETON)

72°0'0"W

72°0'0"W

72°7'30"W

72°7'30"W

42°30'0"N

42°30'0"N

42°22'30"N

42°22'30"N

Stone, J.R., compiler, 2013, Surficial geologic map

of the Mount Grace-Ashburnham-Monson-Webster

24-quadrangle area in central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-I

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/I.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

AND OFFICE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (MassGIS),

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
#### John Hopkins, Respondent, v Stephen M. Margolias, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

July 6, 1978

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Lawrence A. Smith*and *Raymond M. Sales*for respondent. *Held Chevan Sternberg & Held (Bernard Meyerson*of counsel), for appellant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered.

In this negligence action it was error to strike the affirmative defense, as to the cause of action for personal injuries, that the statutory threshold had not been reached (see Insurance Law, § 671, subd 4). The voluntary payment by the *66defendant’s insurer to plaintiff of first-party benefits in the sum of approximately $750 should not preclude the defendant from raising the defense at the trial. To the extent that *Shalem v Teitelbaum*(84 Misc 2d 596) is to the contrary, we decline to follow it. There is nothing in the Insurance Law which indicates that payment of first-party benefits pursuant thereto is a waiver of any defenses. Public policy would suggest that insurers be encouraged to make early payment rather than invite resistance to such claims in order to avoid untoward legal consequences. We note that where it is not seriously disputed that the reasonable and customary charges for medical services necessarily performed far exceed the sum of $500, the affirmative defense may be dismissed without the necessity of a trial (see *Greenblatt v Johannssen,*80 Misc 2d 436). However, such is not the situation in the case at bar. We also note that the jury failed to separately state the award for the property damage allegedly sustained by plaintiff.

Concur — Buschmann, P. J., Mangano and Hirsch, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|      |  |                         
|----- |  | ------------------------
|      | 
|      |  | /S/    JONATHAN H. COHEN
|Name: |  | Jonathan H. Cohen       
|Date: |  | November 7, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5005 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5005

 To authorize additional funding for the San Joaquin River Restoration 
                            Settlement Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 2024

Mr. Padilla (for himself and Mr. Hoeven) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize additional funding for the San Joaquin River Restoration 
                            Settlement Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RESTORATION 
              SETTLEMENT ACT.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations To Implement Settlement.--
Section 10009 of the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act 
(Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1355) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``$250,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$750,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``$250,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$750,000,000''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations for Friant Division 
Improvements.--Section 10203(c) of the Omnibus Public Land Management 
Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-11; 123 Stat. 1367) is amended by striking 
``$50,000,000'' and inserting ``$75,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN SCHAUFLER, DOC #H21724, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1444 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed June 20, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; James A. Yancey, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge.

We affirm the trial court's revocation of John Schaufler's probation and the sentences imposed upon revocation without further comment. We note, however, that although the trial court recognized at the March 2017 revocation hearing that it should not re-adjudicate Schaufler guilty of the original offenses because it had already adjudicated him guilty of those offenses in May 2005 when originally imposing- 2 -

probation, see Butler v. State, 195 So. 3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ("Duplicative adjudications of guilt after revocation of probation or community control are superfluous, are unauthorized, and can cause undue confusion in future proceedings."), the record on appeal nevertheless includes a second written judgment adjudicating him guilty of the original offenses. This judgment, which was signed the same day as the revocation hearing and accompanies the written sentences imposed following revocation of his probation, was entered in error. See id. at 1148-49 ("[T]he circuit court only enters a judgment on a violation of probation in those instances when it withheld an adjudication of guilt, i.e., withheld judgment, at the time it originally imposed probation." (quoting Jackson v. State, 56 So. 3d 65, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (Altenbernd, J., concurring))). Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Schaufler's probation and the ensuing sentences but remand for vacatur of the March 2017 written judgment adjudicating Schaufler guilty a second time.

Affirmed in part; remanded with instructions.

KELLY and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
No. 61421.

protest 305168-K (New York).

#### Geo. Borgfeldt Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.