alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8341 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide that any estimate 

prepared by the Congressional Budget Office or the Joint Committee 

on Taxation shall include costs relating to servicing the public debt, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2024 

Mr. CLOUD (for himself, Mr. CASE, Mr. MEUSER, Mr. GOLDEN of Maine, and 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide 

that any estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget 

Office or the Joint Committee on Taxation shall include 

costs relating to servicing the public debt, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cost Estimates Im5 provement Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8341 IH

1 SEC. 2. CBO AND JCT ESTIMATES TO INCLUDE DEBT SERV2 ICING COSTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Congressional Budget and 

4 Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 621 et seq.) 

5 is amended by inserting after section 402 the following: 

6 ‘‘ESTIMATES TO INCLUDE DEBT SERVICING COSTS

7 ‘‘SEC. 403. Any estimate prepared by the Director 

8 of the Congressional Budget Office under section 402, and 

9 any estimate prepared by the Joint Committee on Tax10 ation, shall include, to the extent practicable, the costs (if 

11 any) of servicing the public debt.’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

13 of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating 

14 to section 402 the following: 

‘‘403. Estimates to include debt servicing costs.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Donnell Kinnard,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-2472 FCD PAN P

vs. Amended Notice

David Runnels, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a prisoner, without counsel, seeking leave to

commence an action against prison officials for civil rights

violations in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 

This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 72-302

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). March 9, 2005, the court

issued notice that plaintiff must pay a $250 filing fee. Since

plaintiff submitted his complaint before the filing fee

increased, plaintiff must pay a $150 filing fee. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(b)(1), 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (2000). No initial partial 

Case 2:04-cv-02472-FCD-PAN Document 9 Filed 05/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

filing fee has been assessed. However, plaintiff must make

monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income

credited to his trust fund account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The

agency having custody of plaintiff is required to forward

payments from plaintiff’s account to the clerk of the court each

time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fee

is paid. 

The clerk of the court shall serve a copy of this notice and

a copy of plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application upon the

Director of the California Department of Corrections and deliver

a copy of this notice to the clerk’s financial division.

Dated: May 26, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02472-FCD-PAN Document 9 Filed 05/26/05 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Local.com Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) [language omitted pursuant to SEC Release 34-47086] for the registrant and
have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release 34-47986];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: November 5, 2007
    
    /s/ Heath B. ClarkeHeath B. Clarke`
    
    Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Nathan Cobb and others, Respondents, *v.*Dwight B. Cowles, *Appellant, Impleaded, et*c.

Motion denied.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,

http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center,

U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, gpo@custhelp.com.

61–828 PDF 2010

[ERRATA] S. HRG. 111–679, Pt. 3 

DEEPWATER HORIZON LIABILITY 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON 

ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

TO

RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THE LIABILITY AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ISSUES RELATED TO OFFSHORE OIL PRODUCTION, INCLUDING 

THE DEEPWATER HORIZON ACCIDENT IN THE GULF OF MEXICO, INCLUDING S. 3346, A BILL TO INCREASE THE LIMITS ON LIABILITY 

UNDER THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF LANDS ACT 

MAY 25, 2010 

( 

Printed for the use of the 

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 
[ERRATA] 

S. HRG. 111-679, Pt. 3 

An error was made on the cover of S. Hrg. 111-679, Pt. 3. The 

hearing number should be ‘‘S. Hrg. 111-653, Pt. 3’’ not ‘‘S. Hrg. 

111-679, Pt. 3’’.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 26, 2016

t0718 

# Order

Clerk July 26, 2016

150913

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150913

COA: 323964

Kalamazoo CC: 2013

- 000898

- FH

SHANTEL NICOLE

- LIZA

- MARIE SMITH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 5, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursua nt to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Kalamazoo Circuit Court to

determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under

the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge

, 498 Mich 358 (2015). On

remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If

the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the

unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may r eaffirm the original sentence. If,

however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence

absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.

In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the

remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
1 

### Farquharson, Chenise

From: Mark W Roberts <markroberts@eia-global.org>

Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:46 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy

Cc: lisahandy@eia-global.org; cstarr@eia-global.org; lc handler@eia-global.org; Farquharson, Chenise; Sheppard, Margaret Subject: Re: EIA SNAP Petition - follow up

Hello Cindy,

Happy New Year! Hope that you got a good break.

We appreciate the opportunity to discuss our petiti on with you and look forward to assisting the EPA a nd the SNAP Program continue to change to status of HFCs which are no l onger needed as alternatives to ozone depleting sub stances as there are
alternative s available that pose less of a risk to human healt h and the environment. We look forward to receiving EPA’s formal response to our petition. If you feel that more inf ormation would be helpful to support any portion of our petition, please let us know so we can provide supplemental information for your use as expeditiously as possible.

Mark

Mark W. Roberts Senior Counsel and International Policy Advisor Environmental Investigation Agency
122 Kirkland Drive Stow, MA 01775

Tel: +1.978.298.5705
Cell: +1.617.722.8222 Skype: Mark.W.Roberts1



### CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message originates fr om counsel for the Environmental Investigation Agen cy (“EIA”). The information contained in this e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be a confiden tial attorneyclient communication or may otherwise be privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message, regardless of the address or routing, is not an intended recipien t, you are hereby notified that you have received t his transmittal in error and any review, use, distribution, dissemi nation or copying is strictly prohibited. If you h ave received this message in error, please delete this e- mail and all files transmitted with it from your sy stem and immediately notify EIA by sending a reply e-mail to the sender of this message. Thank you.

From: Cindy Newberg < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >
Date: Monday, January 4, 2016 at 3:38 PM

To: Mark W Roberts < markroberts@eia-global.org >
Cc: " lisahandy@eia-global.org " < lisahandy@eia-global.org >, Christina Starr < cstarr@eia-global.org >, Lowell Chandler

< lchandler@eia-global.org >, "Farquharson, Chenise" < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >, "Sheppard, Margaret"

< Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov > Subject: EIA SNAP Petition - follow up

Dear Mark,

I would like to thank you for the useful exchange w e had on December 17, 2015 concerning the petition filed by Environmental Investigation Agency-US (EIA) on Octo ber 6, 2015. The petition was filed pursuant to se ction 612(d) of2 the Clean Air Act and 40 CFR 82.184(b)(3). We foun d the discussion quite useful and appreciated the o pportunity to clarify a few points. We will follow up shortly wit h our formal response to your petition. In the mean time, if you have any additional questions, please give me a call at the number below.

Happy New Year!

Best, Cindy

Cindy Newberg, Chief
Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch SPD/OAP/OAR U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

+1 202-343-9729
# C_2007217EN.01000501.xml

| 15.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/5

---

Communication to arable crop producers about derogation concerning set aside land obligation in 2008

(2007/C 217/07)

The Commission wishes to draw the attention of Community arable crop producers to the proposal for a Council Regulation adopted by the Commission on 13 September 2007 derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers as regards set aside obligation for the year 2008.

Under the proposal, currently submitted to Council and Parliament for adoption, the obligatory set aside rate for 2008 would be set at 0 %. Therefore, farmers would not be obliged to set aside land from production in order to be entitled to the amount fixed by the set aside entitlements. Farmers could benefit from the measure for their Autumn 2007 and Spring 2008 sowings.

---
Order filed October 27, 2016

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-16-00177-CV

__________

KERWIN STEPHENS; THUNDERBIRD OIL & GAS, LLC; 

THUNDERBIRD RESOURCES, LLC; THUNDERBIRD LAND 

SERVICES, LLC; STEPHENS & MYERS, LLP; AND CHESTER 

CARROLL, Appellants

V.

THREE FINGER BLACK SHALE PARTNERSHIP; TREK 

RESOURCES, INC.; TIBURON LAND & CATTLE, L.P.; L.W. 

HUNT RESOURCES, LLC; AND RICHARD RAUGHTON, 

Appellees

———and———

L.W. HUNT RESOURCES, LLC AND RICHARD RAUGHTON, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST OF 

ARAPAHO ENERGY, LLC, Cross-Appellants

V.

KERWIN STEPHENS; THUNDERBIRD OIL & GAS, LLC; 

THUNDERBIRD RESOURCES, LLC; THUNDERBIRD LAND 
2

SERVICES, LLC; STEPHENS & MYERS, LLP; AND CHESTER 

CARROLL, Cross-Appellees

On Appeal from the 32nd District Court

Fisher County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-2013-0016

O R D E R

On September 15, 2016, this court issued an order in which we granted a 

temporary stay of the enforcement and execution of the underlying judgment against 

Appellants Kerwin Stephens and Thunderbird Resources, LLC so that Stephens and 

Thunderbird Resources could file a motion to review pursuant to Rule 24.4 of the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. We received their motion on October 11, 2016. 

On this day, October 27, 2016, we have denied the motion to review. Accordingly, 

we hereby dissolve the temporary stay entered by this court on September 15, 2016. 

PER CURIAM

October 27, 2016

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

Inconnection with the Form 10-Q of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. forthe quarter ended June 30, 2010, I, William R. Talley, Jr.,Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officerof Frederick County Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)          such Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          the information contained insuch Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofFrederick County Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ William R. Talley, Jr.                                                |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William  R. Talley, Jr.                                                   |   |
| Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                      
|----- |  | ---------------------
|      |  | /s/ JONATHAN H. COHEN
|Name: |  | Jonathan H. Cohen    
|Date: |  | August 11, 2008
#### Elizabeth S. Williams *v.*Orrin F. Barton.

Motion denied.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-10-00714- CR
P atric k Orland o Brewin gton, Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee
F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 426 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 650 45, H ONO RAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O PI N I O N Appellant Patrick Orlando Br ewing ton seeks to appea l a judgme nt of conviction for ag g rava ted sexual assault. The trial court has ce rt i fi ed t h at (1) this is a plea barg ain case and Br ewing ton has no right of appea l, a nd (2) Br ewington ha s waived the right of appea l. The appea l is dismi ssed. SeeTex. R. App. P . 25.2(a) (2), ( d).

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Patterson and H enson Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: De cembe r 2, 2010 Do Not Publish
No. 62619.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 298158-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Upon full consideration of all the proceedings herein, the protest was dismissed.
#### Florence M. De Meli, *Respondent, v.*Henry A. De Meli, *Appellant.*

Order modified as directed in opinion, without costs to either party. Opinion by Davis, P. J.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                   |  |                        |  |                                              
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Name                               |  | State of Incorporation |  | Name Under Which SuchSubsidiary Does Business
|                                   |  |                       
|Frontier Trading Company II LLC    |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                   |  |                       
|Frontier Trading Company III LLC   |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                   |  |                       
|Frontier Trading Company V LLC     |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                   |  |                       
|Frontier Trading Company VI LLC    |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                   |  |                       
|Frontier Trading Company VII, LLC  |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                   |  |                       
|Frontier Trading Company VIII, LLC |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                   |  |                       
|Frontier Trading Company IX, LLC   |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                   |  |                       
|Frontier Trading Company X, LLC    |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                   |  |                       
|Frontier Trading Company XI, LLC   |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                   |  |                       
|Frontier Trading Company XII, LLC  |  | Delaware               |  | Same                                         
|                                   |  |                       
|Frontier Trading Company XIII, LLC |  | Delaware               |  | Same
Before the Third Division,

April 29, 1958

No. 61882.

#### United China & Glass Company *v.*United States,

protests 316228-K/15001, 316420-K/14969, and 322756-K/15151 (New Orleans).

*539Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorated porcelain bonbon dishes the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 50567, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Phineas D. Crosby, Appellant, *v.*Hiram Hotaling and S. Curtis Park, *Respondents.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Dyeman, J.
Enclosure D 

(CONFIDENTIAL Document)
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO

         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
MARCH 31, 2004 (the "Report") of TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP. (the
"Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, JONATHAN H. COHEN, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                                           /s/    Jonathan H. Cohen
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         Name: Jonathan H. Cohen
                                         Date: May 13, 2004