alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-95.htm


Exhibit 10.73

 

 

EXTENSION OF MATURITY DATE OF WARRANTS

 

This Extension of Maturity Date of Warrants (“Extension”) is by and between the individual or entity named on the executed counterpart of the signature page hereto (such signatory is referred to as “Holder”) and OmniComm Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Maker”) and is entered into as of the day the Holder executes a copy of this Extension.

 

WHEREAS, Maker has delivered to Holder that certain 12% Promissory Note of the Maker (“Promissory Note”) dated April 1, 2013 in the aggregate to the Holder in the principal amount of $2,866,879.18. 

 

WHEREAS, the Maturity Date of the Promissory Note, as that term is defined in the Promissory Note, was January 01, 2015, and $2,860,000 in principal due thereunder remains unpaid as of the date hereof.

 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the Maturity Date of the Promissory Note to April 1, 2017.

 

WHEREAS, Holder has all requisite power, authority, and capacity to enter into this Extension and to extend the Maturity Date of the Warrants.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Holder and the Maker hereby agree as follows:

 

	 	
1.
	
Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.



 

	 	
2.
	
No Other Changes. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Promissory Note remain in full force and effect.



 

	 	
3.
	
Warrants Extension. Maker hereby agrees to extend the expiration date on the 11,440,000 Warrants issued in connection with the remaining principal of $2,860,000 Promissory Note on April 1, 2013, which were originally scheduled to expire on March 31, 2016. The new expiration date is April 01, 2017.



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension of Maturity Date of the Warrants associated with the Promissory Note is executed as of the day and date the Holder executes a copy of this Extension.

 

	
 
	
OmniComm Systems, Inc.

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By: /s/ Thomas E. Vickers

	
 
	
             Thomas E. Vickers

	
 
	
             Chief Financial Officer



 

  

[HOLDERS SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

 


 

 




 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned represents that it has caused this extension of Maturity Date of Warrants to be duly executed on its behalf (if an entity, by one of its officers thereunto duly authorized) as of the date written below.

 

 

	
 
	
HOLDER:

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Cornelis F. Wit           

	
 
	
Printed Name of Holder

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By: /s/ Cornelis F. Wit

	
 
	
(Signature of Holder or Authorized Person)

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	 	 
	 	 
	 	Printed Name and Title if Authorized Person
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	January 31, 2015
	 	Date
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-5243

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CERON MONTRELL REED,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (3:05-cr-00419-1)

Submitted: May 30, 2007 Decided: July 10, 2007

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cecilia Oseguera, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA,

INC., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Kevin Zolot,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ceron Montrell Reed pled guilty to carjacking (Count 1),

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119 (2000); using or carrying a

firearm during a crime of violence (Count 2), in violation of 18

U.S.C.A. § 924(c) (West 2000 & Supp. 2007); and possessing a

firearm after being convicted of a felony (Count 3), in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). The district court imposed a

262-month sentence consisting of a total of 142 months as a career

offender on Counts 1 and 3 and a consecutive 120 months on Count 2.

Reed’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging Reed’s sentence on Counts 1 and 3

but stating that, in his view, there are no meritorious issues for

appeal. Reed was informed of his right to file a pro se

supplemental brief but has not done so. We affirm.

Counsel questions whether the district court violated

Reed’s Sixth Amendment rights by classifying Reed as a career

offender under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1 (2005),

where the predicate convictions were not charged in the indictment

or proved beyond a reasonable doubt. This argument is foreclosed

by our decision in United States v. Collins, 412 F.3d 515, 521-23

(4th Cir. 2005). 

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire

record for any meritorious issues and have found none.

Accordingly, we affirm Reed’s convictions and sentence. This court
- 3 -

requires that counsel inform her client, in writing, of his right

to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further

review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but

counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then

counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from

representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof

was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
JAMES DANIEL TURNER 

### '. Abel Acosta, Clerk / 

# l II 

# !/
lSSROl Manufacturing Diagram 

I 

I
```

[House Document 113-39]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

113th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 113-39

 
                 COMBAT-EQUIPPED DETACHMENT DEPLOYMENT

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   A NOTIFICATION OF A DEPLOYMENT AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF A TRAINING 
               EXERCISE FOR A COMBAT-EQUIPPED DETACHMENT

   June 24, 2013.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
                         ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                         Washington, June 21, 2013.
Hon. John Boehner,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Certain U.S. forces recently deployed to 
Jordan solely to participate in a training exercise. This 
exercise ended on June 20, 2013. At the request of the 
Government of Jordan, a combat-equipped detachment of 
approximately 700 of these forces remained in Jordan after the 
conclusion of the exercise to join other U.S. forces already in 
Jordan.
    This detachment that participated in the exercise and 
remained in Jordan includes Patriot missile systems, fighter 
aircraft, and related support, command, control, and 
communications personnel and systems. The detachment will 
remain in Jordan, in full coordination with the Government of 
Jordan, until the security situation becomes such that it is no 
longer needed.
    The deployment of this detachment has been directed in 
furtherance of U.S. national security and foreign policy 
interests, including the important national interests in 
supporting the security of Jordan and promoting regional 
stability, pursuant to my constitutional authority to conduct 
U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in Chief and Chief 
Executive.
    I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep 
the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers 
Resolution (Public Law 93-148). I appreciate the support of the 
Congress in these actions.
            Sincerely,
                                                      Barack Obama.

                                  

```
No. 61901.

#### Sixto E. Bas *v.*United States,

protest 316789-K (San Juan).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v RONALD A. BARBOZA, Private First Class, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

18 USCMA 186, 39 CMR 186

No. 21,689

March 14, 1969

*Captain Jeffrey W. Maurer,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Walter F. Brown,*JAGC, USN, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

We granted review in this case to determine whether Article 38(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 838, had been complied with. The record reflects that, at the outset, a *pro forma*inquiry was made to determine whether the accused had been advised of his rights concerning counsel as set forth in Article 38(b) of the Code.

In United States v Donohew, 18 USCMA 149, 39 CMR 149, decided March 7, 1969, we held that this type of inquiry constituted *minimal*compliance with Article 38 (b). However, as we stated in *Donohew:*

> “We believe the seriousness of the situation dictates that *the record should contain the accused’s personal response to direct questions incorporating each of the elements of Article 38(b), as well as his understanding of his entitlement thereunder.*

> *“Accordingly, the record in each special or general court-martial convened more than thirty days after the date of this*[Donohew] *opinion should reflect this requirement has been met.*United States v Rinehart, 8 USCMA 402, 24 CMR 212.” [Emphasis supplied in part.]

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
97-CA-01493-SCT
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 51 (Friday, March 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12612-12613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4792]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 9, 2007.

[[Page 12613]]

    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Douglas A. Banks, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. LNB Bancorp, Inc., Lorain, Ohio; to merge with Morgan Bancorp, 
Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Morgan Bank, N.A., both of Hudson, 
Ohio.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 12, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-4792 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Marlin Business Services Corp.Date: November 3, 2009
 /s/ Daniel P. Dyer

Daniel P. DyerChief Executive Officer/s/ Lynne C. WilsonLynne C. WilsonChief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President(Principal Financial Officer)
#### ENRIQUE A. ERVESUN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BANK OF NEW YORK, *ETC.,*DEFENDANT-PETITIONER. MARY ELLEN BALDWIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BANK OF NEW YORK, *ETC.,*DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Messrs. RiTcer, Danzig, Scherer & Brown*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Lautman & Rapson*for the respondent.

March 26, 1968.

Denied.
Before the First Division,

July 17, 1943

No. 48563.

#### Protest 554532-G of Winograd Bros., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the dogkins in question are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Brachman*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 153, C. D. 389) the claim for free entry was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4937 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4937

    To require Senate approval before the United States assumes any 
 obligation under a WHO pandemic agreement and to suspend funding for 
        the WHO until such agreement is ratified by the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2024

Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Daines, 
  Mr. Johnson, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Paul, Mr. Ricketts, Mr. 
Risch, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; which 
   was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require Senate approval before the United States assumes any 
 obligation under a WHO pandemic agreement and to suspend funding for 
        the WHO until such agreement is ratified by the Senate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defending American Sovereignty in 
Global Pandemics Act''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF UNITED STATES FUNDING FOR THE WORLD 
              HEALTH ORGANIZATION UNTIL PANDEMIC TREATY IS APPROVED BY 
              THE SENATE.

    (a) Prohibition.--The United States shall not become a party to a 
convention, agreement, or other international instrument under the 
Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic 
prevention, preparedness, and response except pursuant to a treaty made 
under Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United 
States on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Funding Restriction.--The Government of the United States may 
not obligate or expend any funds for the World Health Organization 
beginning on the effective date of an agreement described in subsection 
(a) and ending on the date on which the Senate approves a resolution of 
ratification with respect to such convention, agreement, or instrument.
                                 <all>
```
No. 45030.

#### Protest 21336-K of Premier Peat Moss Corporation (Duluth).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Peat Import Corp.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 181, C. D. 319) the claim for free entry under paragraph 1685 was sustained.
#### Dison Metals Corporation *v.*Joseph Rosenthal’s Sons, Inc., Appellant.

Argued November 18, 1968.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.

*Nathan I. Miller,*with him *Hillel 8. Levinson,*and *Miller, Pincus and Greenberg,*for appellant.

*William F. SulUvan, Jr.,*with him *Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell <& Hippel,*for appellee.

January 15, 1969:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Decree affirmed. Costs on appellant.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Worldspan, L.P. (the “Company”) Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Rakesh Gangwal,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael S.Wood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

 

(1).                                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2).                                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  |  November 8, 2004 |   | By:    |  /s/ Rakesh Gangwal                           |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                   |   |   | Rakesh Gangwal                                     |
|   |                   |   |   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive  Officer   |
|   |                   |   |   |                                               |
| Date:  |  November 8, 2004 |   | By:    |  /s/ Michael S. Wood                          |   |
|   |                   |   |   | Michael S. Wood                                    |
|   |                   |   |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DENISE WHITE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 17

- 55561

D.C. No.

5:15

- cv

- 01198

- VAP

- KES

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Virginia A. Phillips, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2019 **

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Denise White appeals pro se the district court’s judgment affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of White’s applications for disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the

Social Secur ity Act. Reviewing de novo, we may set aside a denial of benefits

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

APR 9 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 55561

only if it is not supported by substantial evidence, or if the administrative law

judge (“ALJ”) applied the wrong legal standard. Molina v. Astrue , 674 F.3d 1104,

1110 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

The ALJ’s finding s concerning White’s back injury are supported by

substantial evidence

. See id. at 1111 (if the record contains evidence “susceptible

to more than one rational interpretation, we must uphold the ALJ’s findings if they

are supported by inferences reasonably drawn from the record ”) ; Thomas v.

Barnhart , 278 F.3d 948, 957 (9th Cir. 2002) ( “The o pinions of non

- treating or non

examining physicians may also serve as substantial evidence when the opinions are

consistent with independent clinical findings or other evidence in the record

. ”).

AFFIRMED

.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of IceWEB, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. July 15, 2010/s/ Mark B. LuckyMark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer and
principal financial and accounting officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter  Ended  August 31, 2004 (the  "Report") by
Advanced Media Training, Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.

October 13, 2004                    By:      /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                            --------------------------
                                            Buddy Young
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                            Financial Officer