alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GEORGE C. WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES SMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued October 24,1967

Decided February 5,1968.

*Mr. William, D. Dilles*argued the cause for appellant.

*Mr. William E. Hughes*argued the cause for respondent.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion in the Appellate Division.

*For affirmance*— Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Schettino and Ha new an—6.

*For*reversal—None.
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

Inconnection with the Form 10-Q of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. forthe quarter ended June 30, 2009, I, William R. Talley, Jr., ExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)   such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   the information contained in such Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Frederick CountyBancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ William R.  Talley, Jr.                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William R.  Talley, Jr.                          |   |
| Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 2.4




---



##### 



REGIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC.,
a Virginia corporationBy:
    /s/ Ian T. BothwellIan T. BothwellPresident and Chief Executive OfficerREGIONAL ENTERPRIZES, INC.,
a Virginia corporationBy:
    /s/ W. Gary Farrar, Jr.W. Gary Farrar, Jr.President  2




---



##### 



Exhibit A
       Merger.
 Effective Time
 Effect of Merger on Outstanding Shares.




---



##### 



Exchange of Shares.
 Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.
 Termination or Abandonment.
 Other Provisions.
     2




---



##### 



REGIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC.,
a Virginia corporationBy:
    /s/ Ian T. BothwellIan T. BothwellPresident and Chief Executive OfficerREGIONAL ENTERPRIZES, INC.,
a Virginia corporationBy:
    /s/ W. Gary Farrar, Jr.W. Gary Farrar, Jr.President  3
No. 52632.

protests 140485-K, etc. (New York).

#### Sam Forwand Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT  99.2

                              BLUE MOON GROUP, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Blue Moon Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Norman
J. Birmingham, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ NORMAN J. BIRMINGHAM
----------------------------------------
NORMAN J. BIRMINGHAM
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
April 14, 2003



The foregoing certifications are made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.
Skip       NavigationUSGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Woods Hole Science Center
GIS Compilation of Data Collected from the Pulley Ridge Deep Coral       Reef Region
USGS Open-File Report 2005-1089

byVeeAnn A. Cross1, David C. Twichell1,       Robert B. Halley2, Kate T. Ciembronowicz2, Bret D.       Jarrett3, Erika S. Hammar-Klose1, Al C.       Hine3, Stan D. Locker3, Dave F. Naar3

1 U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole,       Massachusetts2 U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg,       Florida3 College of Marine Science, University of South       Florida, St. Petersburg, Florida

2005

OF 2005-1089

Disc             Contents

Introduction

Surficial             Geology

GIS/Visualization

Data             Catalog

References             Cited

Acknowledgments

Contacts

Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does             not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Skip Navigation
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2005-1089/index.htmPage Contact Information: WHSC WebmasterThis page last modified on Monday, 14-Jan-2013 12:50:16 EST
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSE CRUZ REYES, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 98 *N. J. Super.*506.

*Mr. Solomon Golat*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Joseph P. Lordi*and *Mr. Alan Bilber*for the respondent.

May 28, 1968.

Denied.
#### State of Kansas, *Appellee,*v. Michael Scott and Reginald McCallister, *Appellants.*

No. 48,243

Opinion filed December 11, 1976.

*Michael Lerner,*of Barnett and Lemer, Chartered, of Kansas City, argued the cause, and *David J. Heath,*of the same firm, was with him on the brief for the appellants.

*Philip L. Sieve,*chief deputy district attorney, argued the cause, and *Curt T. Schneider,*attorney general, and *Nick A. Tomasic,*district attorney, were with him on the brief for the appellee.

Prager, J.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of
East Coast Diversified Corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014, as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kayode Aladesuyi, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |     |                                                                                                          | 
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: August 19, 2014 | By: | /s/ Kayode Aladesuyi                                                                                     | 
|                      |     | Kayode Aladesuyi                                                                                         | 
|                      |     | Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
        East Coast Diversified Corporation | 
|                      |     |                                                                                                          |
January 22, 2013 Director, Chemical Control Division US Environmental ProtectionAgency Office ofPollution Prevention and Toxics EPAEast Room4146 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 

### Re: EPA- HQ- OPPT- 2003 · 0012 

### MJ !0: 58 DuPontChemicals and Fluoroproducts Chambers Works Deepwater, NJ 08023



### DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES PermitNo. NJ0005100 PFOA Data Submittal- Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples December2012 SampleData DearChemical Control Division: Attachedplease find a summaryofPFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662AinDecember 2012. In accordance with the current siteNJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these results are providedto NJDEP on a monthlybasis viaelectronic discharge monitoring reports. The enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies ofthe analytical results from this monitoringperiod. Sincerely, Jacques Monteux: UnitManager-SiteManufacturing Systems DuPontChambersWorks
JM/clc Enclosures 

# ~,,- A\NS NO CB\ 

# c \'!Copyto: Document Control Office US Environmental ProtectionAgency Office ofPollution Prevention and Toxics EPAEast Room6428 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) PrincipalEnvironmental Engineer NJDEPDivision ofWater Quality Bureau ofPoint SourcePermitting
- Region 2 401 E. State Street P.O. Box029 Trenton, NJ 08625-0029

TT 1··
- ....Analyte 'PFOA Sample ID Date Top (ft) Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) units Diss. {D) Duplicate# ug/L T Summary of Analytical Results 662

- December 2012 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 12/3/12 12/10/12 12/17/12 12/24/12 12/31/12 0

0

0

0

0 0

0

0

0

0 1

1

1

1

1 0.619 2.83 4.01 2.20 1.03

I i PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid ug/L = micrograms per Liter I ug/L- micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) ND = not detected (shown as <LOD) NQ
- not quantifiable (shown as <LOQ) ND<LOD<NO<LOQ LOD

- limit of detection

- 0.0233 ug/L LOQ = limit of quantification

= 0.1 00 ug/L Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results represent

a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 12/31/12. Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample collected on 12/31/12 represents the average of lab duplicate results.

1 The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. .<;and ND =Non detect at stated reporting limit

Page 1 of 1

cwk 662 grab results_dec12:Sheet1 1/25/2013 2:49PM

! f=
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER

OF THE ESTATE

OF MICHAEL SOTHORON GEORGE §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 1 15

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2

of Brazos C ounty, Texas

(TC# 15198

- PC )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is a joint motion to dismiss the appeal because the parties have

resolved the dispute. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

Costs of the appeal are taxed against Appellant s

. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement

of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant

. ”).

April 22, 2016

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RODNEY BRIDENTHAL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 670

[ July 5, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Okeechobee County ; Dan L. Vaughn , Judge; L.T. Case No.

472012CF000424A

.

Rodney Bridenthal, Blountstown, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J.

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, G ROSS and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4966 

To authorize public housing agencies to use assistance from the Capital 

Fund for energy performance contracts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Mr. WELCH (for himself, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize public housing agencies to use assistance from 

the Capital Fund for energy performance contracts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Energy Ef5 ficiency for Affordable Housing Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF CAPITAL FUND ASSISTANCE BY PUBLIC 

7 HOUSING AGENCIES FOR ENERGY PERFORM8 ANCE CONTRACTS. 

9 Section 9(d) of the United States Housing Act of 

10 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437g(d)) is amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4966 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(K), by inserting before 

2 ‘‘and by’’ the following: ‘‘by entering into energy 

3 performance contracts (as defined in paragraph 

4 (4)),’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) DEFINITION OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE

7 CONTRACT.—For purposes of this subsection, the 

8 term ‘energy performance contract’ means a con9 tract described in section 990.185(a) of title 24, 

10 Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regu11 lation.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
August 18, 2014 

Submitted Electronically 

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: FAA Docket # FAA-2014-0568 

Gentlemen: 

E111p1re AIRLINESg 

11559 North Atlas Road 

Hayden, ID 83835 

(208) 292-3850 

fax (208) 292-3851 

www.empireairlines.com 

www.empireaerospace.com 

This proposed AD concerns fuel probes installed in ATR-GIE Avions de Transport Regional 

Model ATR42 and ATR72 airplanes. This proposal contains several references to Zodiac 

Aerospace Services Europe Service Bulletin 766983-28-002 dated October 15, 2013. This 

revision is the original issue and has been superseded. Revision 1 of Zodiac Service Bulletin 

766983-28-002 has an issue date of March 24, 2014. 

Revision 1 corrects the part numbers in the original issue, Paragraph 1. A. (2) & Appendix I: 

P/N 768-055, 768-100, 798-038, instead of 768-055-0, 768-100-0, 798-038-0. 

Your attention to this matter prior to Final Rule publication will negate the necessity for an 

alternate method of compliance request. 

Thank You. 

/:::!~ Airworthiness Directive Administrator 

JonM@empireaerospace.com 

H/e Can Do Thar®
(Reap. Dec. 8538)

#### Kingston Chemical Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided February 1, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Warren B. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise in the above enumerated Appeal to Reappraisement herein consists of Para Amino Salicylic Acid dutiable under the provisions of Paragraph 27 of the Tariff Act of 1930, wherein Paragraph 27 Sub-division (c) provides that “the ad valorem.rates provided in this paragraph shall be based upon the American selling price (as defined in Sub*525division (g) of Section 402, Title IV) of any similar competitive article manufactured or produced in the United States”.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the merchandise herein the American selling price of an article manufactured or produced in the United States which is similar and competitive to the merchandise embraced in the invoice covered by this stipulation, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for delivery, at which such article is freely offered for sale for domestic consumption to all purchasers in the principal market of the United States, in the ordinary course of trade and in the usual wholesale quantities in such market is as follows:

> $3.40 per pound less *1%*cash discount, net packed, and that such value is the value of the merchandise herein and that there was no higher value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Re-appraisement covered hereby may be submitted upon this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of tbe Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise bere involved, and that sucb value was $3.40 per pound, less 1 per centum cash discount, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

FELIX S. VANN, JR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-413

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed June 20, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Hillsborough County; Michelle 

Sisco, Judge.

Felix S. Vann, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 812.135(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2009); Staley v. State, 934 So. 

2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Allan Weiss, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elderwatch, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuers internal control over financial reporting.



5. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditor and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



By/s/ Allan Weiss

Allan Weiss

Principal Accounting Officer



Date:  August 17, 2005
No. 47937

#### Protest 846399-G of Tupman Thurlow Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial counsel for the plaintiff introduced in evidence without objection on the part of the Government the report of the collector of customs and the customs inspector with respect to the marking of the merchandise. The report of the inspector shows that the cases were marked “Sud. Africa.” No report of the collector was found in the papers. It was found that the evidence introduced had no bearing on the claims made in the protest, which was accordingly overruled.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. (the Company) on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Kenneth T. Neilson and Christina L. Maier, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



/s/ Kenneth T. NeilsonKenneth T. NeilsonChief Executive Officer/s/ Christina L. MaierChristina L. MaierChief Financial Officer


April 30, 2015

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be considered filed as part of the Report.