alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

March 19, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Farm Crisp Holding, Inc. Exemption Request Under 

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 49 

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Farm Crisp Holdings, Inc. (Farm Crisp), an 

agricultural imaging service company and operator of small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

(sUAS), seeks an exemption from the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 

to allow commercial operation of the DJI Spreading Wings S900 (S900) within the 

National Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low-risk, precision agricultural aerial 

mapping and surveying. 

Farm Crisp, in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the requirements of 

14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2),and 91.417(a) and (b). 

Farm Crisp has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition 

because it would not set a precedent and because the relief requested is identical to 

exemptions granted previously. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. See Exemption Nos. 11109, 11110, 

11114, 11136, 11166, 11167, 11170, 11172, 11177, 11185 11192, 11193, and 11195.

In addition, Farm Crisp will be utilizing the same DJI proven technologies the FAA has 

already scrutinized and approved for fourteen (14) other Section 333 exemptions. 

Moreover, Farm Crisp provides an enhanced level of safety over other approved uses of 

DJI products in that, the proposed precision agriculture operations occur over specific

remote fields in rural areas. 

Finally, Farm Crisp’s package accompanying the Section 333 Petition for Exemption is 

robust, thorough, and comprehensive, and along with the published S900 User’s Manual, 
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

A2 Flight Control System User Manual, and Ground Station Wireless Data-link User 

manual, includes the Farm Crisp Flight Operations and Procedures Manual, Safety 

Management Systems Manual, Maintenance Manual, and Aircrew Training Program. 

All of the appropriate documentation to accompany Farm Crisp’s Section 333 Petition is 

included. Combined, this comprehensive package, the approvals the FAA has already 

given to DJI products and the technology, should provide the support necessary to the 

FAA for a summary grant of Farm Crisp’s Section 333 Petition and expedite the process. 

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Jim Williams

Joe Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.
11/17/201 1 10:35 FAX 20249351^2 FAA ^ OHS 0001/00 2 

N I T E D ^ ii-;A!MSP0RW10N 

• •• O& B OFERATiOMS 

Jonathan T.Linde ZOi! NOV H A il ^ i I 

Managing Direcior. Ssnior Counsel Regulatory 

Jonathan.Linde9unilod.CQm 

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Adminisiration 

800 Independence Avenue. SW 

Washingion, DC 20591 

Atienlion; Hearing Docker Clerk AGO 430 

Wllbui Wright Building Room 2014 

Re: KAACascNo. 2010SW270157 I' h K - '^Oll - {^ 1 ^^ ^ 

I'O ihc Hearing Docket Clerk; 

Pursuant lo 14 CFR 13.215. Continental Airlines;. Inc. ("Continental") hereby withdraws its 

request ioi a hearinf; in rhc aJ>ove-jeferenced case. Settlement has been re.iched with the hederal 

Aviati»:tn Adniinistraiion ("FAA ") on an order ih;ii Coniinciiial has agreed not to appeal, and the 

F A A will not file a complaint agains-t Coniincntal in ihii matter. Thi.s settlemenl doe.*; not 

con.'^ijtuie or imply iidinisLsion by Continental thai if committed the violciiious alleged by the h'AA 

in ihiii ea.'^c oi- agrees with the facts alleged by the FAA. 

Daicd: November 7. 2011 

Respectfully submitted. 

IJNITFD AIR LINES. LVC. 

Jonathan T. Linde 

Managing Direcior, Senior Counsel Regulatoi"y' 

Regulatory, Alliances and International 

United Air Lines. Inc. 

77 West VVacker Drive, 16"' Floor HDQLD 

Cliicaeo, Illinois 6()60l 

'17F: G12) 997-8 41 

E-niiUl." jondlhrtn.limJctSuniied.com 

Ccnificate of Service attaehed 

Copy to: Tim Duff. Estj. 

Federal .Aviation Administration 

(Office of Regional Counsel. Soiithwesl Rei^ion 

2601 Meacham Boulc'viird 

Fort VVonh. Ti.Aa.'i 7619:^-(>iK)7 

Via Federal Express and Facsimile (8J7) 222-5945/5092 

Thfl UnrtAd Building—hDQLA 77 Westv;aci<(?i Drive, Chicago. IL60601 A STAR ALLlArJGE M^WR^ R 'T^ 
11/17/201 1 10.3 5 FAX 2024935M 2 FA.^^ - QMS ©002/002 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

1 hereby certify thai the attached document w;i'^ delivered overnight by Federal Exprcs.s and sent 

by facsimile to the following attorney of record for the Federal Aviarion Admmistraiion on 

November 7. 201 I: 

7im f)uff, E,sq. 

Federal .Aviation .Adminisn-ation 

Office of Regional Counsel. Southwest Region 

2601 Meacham Boulevard 

Eon Wonh, Texas 76193-0007 

Via Federal E\pre.v=: ^nd Facsimile (SI7) 222-5945/5092 

Dated: November 7. 2011 

Jonathan T. Linde 

Thp IinrTftd Buiidinq—HtJQLA, 77 West vtfacker Drive. Chicago. IL60601
����������	�����

�������������

���������

�������

������

�����	

����

������

�����

������

������

���������

������

������

������

����������	���	������

�

� � � ��	�

�������������������������	������������������ �����!����������

������	��"������#$����%�	�!������ �����&'���&���

"��	&���"��

���(��)������&

*�!%+�&�

���,�����-�.�� ����

����������	���	������

 !��
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Damon Moyler, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 593]

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, defendant contends, *inter alia,*that County Court improperly delegated a judicial function in allowing a court employee to instruct the jury, out of defendant’s presence, to continue deliberating, thereby depriving defendant of his right to be present at a critical stage of trial. We agree and therefore reverse defendant’s conviction.

CPL 310.30 provides that, upon a jury request for further instruction or information, "the court must direct that the jury be returned to the courtroom and, after notice to both the people and counsel for the defendant, and in the presence of the defendant, must give such requested information or instruction as the court deems proper.” It is well settled that the trial court’s response to the jury’s request for further instruction or information is a critical stage of trial at which defendant has a right to be present *(see, People v Torres,*72 NY2d 1007, 1008-1009; *People v Mehmedi,*69 NY2d 759, 760, *rearg denied*69 NY2d 985; *People v Ciaccio,*47 NY2d 431, 436-437). Further, the court may not delegate the responsibility of communicating with the jury to non-judicial personnel, and generally may not communicate with the jury through a nonjudicial intermediary *(see,*CPL 310.30; *People v Torres, supra; People v Mehmedi, supra; People v Ahmed,*66 NY2d 307, *rearg*

*944
      *denied*67 NY2d 647; *People v Ciaccio, supra.; People v Bonilla,*186 AD2d 748). A violation of that rule cannot be waived or consented to by defendant, presents a reviewable question of law even in the absence of objection, and is not amenable to harmless error analysis *(see, People v Cain,*76 NY2d 119, 121, 124; *People v Mehmedi, supra; People v Nichols,*163 AD2d 904, 905; *People v Jones,*159 AD2d 644, 645, *lv denied*76 NY2d 790, 894).

Here, even in the absence of objection by defendant, the court committed reversible error in responding to the jurors’ note concerning a possible hung jury by giving a court employee a note instructing the jury to continue deliberating *(see, People v Torres, supra; People v Bonilla, supra).*An instruction to continue deliberations is not a mere "ministerial” matter concerning which a non-judicial employee might be permitted to communicate with the jury *(see, People v Torres, supra; see also, People v Bonaparte,*78 NY2d 26, 30-31).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions, including the insufficiency and weight of the evidence contentions, and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Do-err and Balio, JJ.
September 7, 1944

No. 49708.

Suit 4459.

#### *United States*v. *Joseph Fischer as Liquidating Agent of Schmoll Fils Assd., Inc., et al.*

Reap. Dec. 5881 modified (32 C. C. P. A. 62, C. A. D. 286).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report of GEOPHARMA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mihir K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mihir K. TanejaMihir K. TanejaChief Executive OfficerJune 29, 2007
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Terence Yap, the Chief Financial Officer ofCHINA SECURITY & SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBYCERTIFY that: 

1. 

The Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2007 (the"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. 

Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operation of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed thisstatement this 13th****day of November 2007. 

/s/ Terence Yap                                                Terence Yap Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc.and will be retained by China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing 

----
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00424-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 431st District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-7382-211

Before Birdwell, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Bassel, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

SONIA CHOWDHURY, ATM CHOWDHURY, ASMA OZZELL INDIVIDUALLY,

FAHIM CHOWDHURY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF MINORS 

F.C., AND M.C., Appellants

V.

NATHANIEL OWEN SELMAN, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellants’ Motion to Dismiss.” We grant the motion 

and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: September 15, 2022
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE 

MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TYLER THOMPSON,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-1925

LT Case Nos. 2021-300892-CFDB

 2021-300893-CFDB

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed April 25, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Volusia County,

Elizabeth A. Blackburn, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and 

Steven N. Gosney, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, HARRIS and JAY, JJ., concur.
No. 50477.

#### Protest 111816-K/12683-A of Standard Fruit & Steamship Co. (New Orleans).

*265Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial Government counsel moved to dismiss the protest as untimely under the provision of section 514. Since the time within which protests may be filed after liquidation had expired, the court held it had no jurisdiction to determine the issue. The protest was therefore dismissed.
### TEST DATA REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT P-11-0107 Post-Focus Draft Revision 1 4/5/2011
ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ BCS \ AH PV (kg/yr):
Revision Notes/Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER:
USE: Emulsifier and anti-stripping agent for asphalt.

OTHER USES:

MSDS : Yes LABEL : N o Gen Eqpt: Eye: face shield, chemical goggles // Skin: chemical resistant gloves and clothing // Eng Controls: local mechanical ventilation Respirator: Where airborne exposure is likely or airborne exposure limits are exceeded (if| applicable, see above), use NIOSH approved respiratory protection equipment appropriate to the material and/or its components. Full facepiece equipment is recommended. Health Effects: Causes Eye and Skin Burns. // May cause blindness. // Causes respiratory tract irritation. // May cause allegic skin reaction. TLV/PEL : - none established
CRSS: (12/20/2010): Chemical Name: S-H2O: Dispersible g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: Neat: Liquid Mfg: N K - Imported

Consumer Use: SAT (concerns): (12/ 21 /2010):
Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox Analogs Migration to groundwater: N egligiblePBT rating: P 2 B 1 T 1

. Health: 2-3, Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 3, Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb)
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B
NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS :

P2 REC:
EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 1) # of workers exposed : 33 >1000 ? 2) >100 workers with > 10 mg/day inhalation exposure: 3) ( a ) >100 workers w/1-10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100 days/yr: (b) Routine Dermal Cont : > 250 workers & > 100 days/yr:P-11-0107

PROC:
Number of Sites/Location:
Basis:

Process Description:



## ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

High End: to:
from: basis:



## RELEASE TOTAL kg/y r -



## OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Dermal: Exposure to High End: Number of workers (all sites) with Dermal exposure: Basis:P-11-0107

USE:
Number of Sites/Location:
Basis: Process Description:


## ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium

Output 2: to: from: basis:



## RELEASE TOTAL kg/y r -



## OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:
(Reap. Dec. 8565)

#### Amicale Wool Service Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 20652, etc.

(Decided April 6, 1956)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the rayon staple fiber involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of Germany in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including all costs, charges, and expenses specified in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, was as set out in said schedule “A.”

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find- the proper dutiable export value of the merchandise covered by the appeals herein to be the value to be as set out in said schedule *“A.”*Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Schedule “A”

Amicale Wool Service Co., Inc.

*Reap. No. Coll. No. Entry No. Value*

241181-[ A XXXX XXXXX ] $0.2560 per lb. net packed

241182-A 3425 79 0.2460 “ “ “ “

241183-[ A XXXX XXX X ].2460 “ “ “ “

241184-[ A XXXX XXXX X ].2460 “ “ “ “

241185-[ A XXXX XXXX X ].2460 “ “ “ “
EX 31.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of INFe-Human Resources, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Arthur Viola, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of INFe-Human Resources, Inc.;



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



October 24, 2006



/s/  ARTHUR VIOLA

________________________

Arthur Viola

Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director
No. 54117.

#### The E. M. Lohrmann Company *v.*United States,

protests 133513-K, etc. (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 40-F
 o
    
    REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 OR
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(a) OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
    
    Commission File Number 001-15014
 Sun Life Financial Inc.
  Canada
 52411
 Not Applicable
 150
King Street West, 6 th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 1J9 (416) 979-4800
 Sun
Life Assurance Company of Canada  U.S. Operations Holdings, Inc.
One Sun Life Executive Park
Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts 02481
(781) 237-6030
  Title of each class
    
    Name of each exchange on which registeredCommon Shares
    
    New York Stock Exchange
  Not Applicable
  Not Applicable




---



##### 



þ     Annual information form
    
    þ     Audited annual financial statements
  Common Shares
    
    
    564,479,572Class A Preferred Shares Series 1
    
    
    16,000,000Class A Preferred Shares Series 2
    
    
    13,000,000Class A Preferred Shares Series 3
    
    
    10,000,000Class A Preferred Shares Series 4
    
    
    12,000,000Class A Preferred Shares Series 5
    
    
    10,000,000Class A Preferred Shares Series 6R
    
    
    10,000,000
  o þ
  þ o
 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
  Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 2009 Annual MD&A
 Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 2009 Annual Financial Statements
 Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
  Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting




---



##### 



Identification of Audit Committee
 2009 AIF
 Audit Committee Financial Expert
 .
 Code of Ethics
  Principal Accountant Fees and Services
   Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
  Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
  Comparison with New York Stock Exchange Governance Rules
  UNDERTAKING




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Sun Life Financial Inc.By:
    /S/  Thomas A. BogartThomas A. BogartExecutive Vice-President and
General Counsel Dated: February 11, 2010
   EXHIBITS
 1.
    
    Annual Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 20092.
    
    Consolidated Financial Statement for the year ended December 31, 20093.
    
    Annual Information Form dated February 11, 20104.
    
    Sun Life Financial Code of Business Conduct5.
    
    Consent of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants6.
    
    Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on
Canada-United States of America Reporting Difference7.
    
    Consent of Appointed Actuary8.
    
    Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of United States Code, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 20029.
    
    Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Archive

**Back to PCHA HomePage**
DJI 

### Inspire 1 User Manual (EN) v1.8

-

http://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/inspire_1/fr/Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.0_fr.pdf