alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS

I, BRIAN FISHER, certify,  pursuant to Rule 13a-4 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
with respect to the Annual Report of 1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.  (formerly  Pultronex
Corporation) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31, 2002 ("Report") that:

(1) I have reviewed this Report;

(2) based on my knowledge,  this Report does not contain any untrue statement of
a  material  fact  or omit  to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

(3)  based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements  and  other  financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of 1-900 Jackpot, Inc.
(formerly  Pultronex  Corporation) as of, and for the periods  presented in this
Report;

(4) I am responsible for  establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and  15d-14)  for 1-900
Jackpot,  Inc.  (formerly  Pultronex  Corporation) and I have: (a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material  information relating
to 1-900 Jackpot,  Inc. (formerly Pultronex  Corporation) is made known to me by
others,  particularly  during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
(b) evaluated the  effectiveness  of 1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.  (formerly  Pultronex
Corporation)'s  disclosure  controls and  procedures as of a date within 90 days
prior  to the  filing  date of this  Report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and (c)
presented  in  this  Report  my  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of  the
disclosure  controls and procedures  based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

(5) I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation,  to our auditors and
the audit  committee  of our  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent  function):  (a)  all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or
operation  of  internal  controls  which could  adversely  affect our ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for our
auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and (b) any fraud,
whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in our internal controls; and





DATE:   NOVEMBER 22, 2005

BY:      /S/ BRIAN FISHER
      ---------------------------
             BRIAN FISHER
    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-1428EA

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Domingo Jesse Campos, also known as *

Edwin Diaz Mojica, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: September 21, 1998

Filed: September 30, 1998 

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

After two inconclusive trials, a third jury convicted Domingo Jesse Campos of

several cocaine-related offenses. The Government called a number of witnesses to

support its burden, including Campos’s friend, Eva Garcia, and abundantly established

Campos’s considerable cocaine-dealing activity. Garcia testified to what she saw and

what Campos told her about his cocaine-related activity. Campos contends he was

prejudiced by Garcia’s testimony because he did not know the Government intended

to call her as a witness. Campos concedes the Government was not obligated to make

a pretrial disclosure of its witnesses. See United States v. Porter, 850 F.2d 464, 465
-2-

(8th Cir. 1988). After reviewing the record, we are satisfied the district court did not

abuse its discretion in permitting Garcia to testify. Campos lived with Garcia before

his arrest, the district court allowed Campos’s counsel to interview Garcia before she

testified, and Campos does he suggest he would have tried the case differently knowing

that Garcia was a witness. See id. Also, when Campos testified, he did little to

contradict Garcia’s version of his drug-dealing activity, and his tactical decision not to

move for a continuance shows that he was not surprised by Garcia’s addition as a

Government witness. See United States v. French, 12 F.3d 114, 117 (8th Cir. 1993);

United States v. Krohn, 558 F.2d 390, 394 (8th Cir. 1977). Campos further contends

Garcia is his common-law wife and her testimony violates the marital privilege. We

disagree. The record shows Garcia was merely one of Campos’s live-in female friends

and nothing more. Because Campos failed to raise the marital-privilege issue in the

district court, we review for plain error and find none. See United States v. Zerba, 21

F.3d 250, 253 (8th Cir. 1994). Finally, contrary to Campos’s contention, the district

court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted evidence that cocaine was

discovered in Campos’s clothing on the first day of his trial. See United States v.

Logan, 121 F.3d 1172, 1178 (8th Cir. 1997).

We affirm Campos’s convictions.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 23.3
                                                                    ------------






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


Board of Directors
First Mutual Bancshares, Inc.
Bellevue, Washington

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial condition
of First Mutual Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December
31, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31,
1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

January 28, 2000
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Tony Philipp, the Chief Executive Officer and Paul Schmidt, the
      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of UPSNAP, INC. (the "Company"), DO HEREBY
      CERTIFY that:





1.  The
      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31,
      2006 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th
      day of February 2007.








/s/
      Tony Philipp


Tony
      Philipp


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





/s/
      Paul Schmidt


Paul
      Schmidt


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      UpSNAP, Inc. and will be retained by Upsnap, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jacques Dozier, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 210]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.), rendered September 5, 1991, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal the denial of the branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement authorities was ineffective *(see, People v Bray,*154 AD2d 692; CPL 710.70 [2]). However, the hearing court correctly concluded that the defendant’s three statements were admissible at trial *(see, e.g., People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761; *People v Watson,*198 AD2d 461; *People v De-LaCruz,*194 AD2d 620, 621). The first statement was a spontaneous utterance *(see, e.g., People v Ellis,*58 NY2d 748), and the second and third statements were made only after the defendant had knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his constitutional rights. The defendant’s contention that he was too impaired by fatigue, hunger, and the bruises that had been inflicted by his neighbors to make a voluntary statement is belied, *inter alia,*by his failure to seek medical attention and by his appearance on the videotape of one of the statements *(see, e.g., People v Turner,*200 AD2d 603, 604; *People v Diaz,*177 AD2d 500).

Finally, the defendant waived his right to appeal the terms *656of his plea and sentence, including the adequacy of his factual allocution *(see, e.g., People v Burk,*181 AD2d 74). In any event, nothing in the defendant’s factual allocution casts doubt upon his guilt, negates an essential element of the crime, or suggests a legitimate defense *(see, e.g, People v Clinton,*179 AD2d 670; *People v Thomas,*159 AD2d 529; *People v Zeth,*148 AD2d 960). O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.
Before the Second Division,

May 12, 1955

No. 59053.

protest 234725-K (New York)

#### Harold Dessau, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, the court found nothing therein which tended in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/12/2015 COA No. 07-13-00286-CR

VIDALES, SAMMY Tr. Ct. No. 2012-436,579 PD-0705-15

I have this day received and filed the State Prosecuting Attorney’s Petition for

Discretionary Review. [The Court requires ten copies of this document to be filed in

this office within three (3) days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will

result in the refusal of the petition.]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

SAMMY VIDALES

TDC# 1880275

ROBERTSON UNIT

12071 FM 3522

ABILENE, TX 79601OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/12/2015 COA No. 07-13-00286-CR

VIDALES, SAMMY Tr. Ct. No. 2012-436,579 PD-0705-15

I have this day received and filed the State Prosecuting Attorney’s Petition for

Discretionary Review. [The Court requires ten copies of this document to be filed in

this office within three (3) days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will

result in the refusal of the petition.]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

LISA MCMINN

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

P.O. BOX 13046

AUSTIN, TX 78711

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/12/2015 COA No. 07-13-00286-CR

VIDALES, SAMMY Tr. Ct. No. 2012-436,579 PD-0705-15

I have this day received and filed the State Prosecuting Attorney’s Petition for

Discretionary Review. [The Court requires ten copies of this document to be filed in

this office within three (3) days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will

result in the refusal of the petition.]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

7TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

VIVIAN LONG

POTTER COUNTY COURTS BUILDING, SUITE 2A

P.O. BOX 9540

AMARILLO, TX 79101

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/12/2015 COA No. 07-13-00286-CR

VIDALES, SAMMY Tr. Ct. No. 2012-436,579 PD-0705-15

I have this day received and filed the State Prosecuting Attorney’s Petition for

Discretionary Review. [The Court requires ten copies of this document to be filed in

this office within three (3) days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will

result in the refusal of the petition.]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

DISTRICT ATTORNEY LUBBOCK COUNTY

MATTHEW D. POWELL

P.O. BOX 10536

LUBBOCK, TX 79408-3536

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
#### John Ackley, *as Executor, etc., Appellant, v.*Franklin J. Parmenter, Respondent.

"Reargument ordered. Bookes, J., not acting.
No. 41843.

#### Protest 95606-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consists of Normandy laces, embroidered. The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained as to these articles. The record also showed that certain of the articles are in chief value of cellulose filaments. In accordance therewith the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 as articles in chief value of cellulose filaments was sustained.
No. 52358.

protests 528036-G, etc. (New York).

#### Max Fischer *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
U.S. National Arboretum Plant Introduction

Floral and Nursery Plants Research Unit

U.S. National Arboretum, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 3501 New York Ave., N.E., Washington, DC 20002

Acer rubrum 'Somerset' and

'Sun Valley'

The U.S. National Arboretum presents 'Somerset' and 'Sun Valley' red maples,

two additional selections from the U.S. National Arboretum red maple

research evaluation program. Showing excellent, long-lasting red fall color,

tolerance to potato leafhopper, and symmetrical form, these male selections will fill

important niches in the nursery industry and in the landscape.

'Somerset'

'Sun Valley'
U.S. National Arboretum Plant Introduction

Floral and Nursery Plants Research Unit

U.S. National Arboretum: www.ars-grin.gov/na/

'Somerset' and 'Sun Valley' Red Maple

November 1999

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an Equal Opportunity Employer.

Botanical Name: Acer rubrum L. 'Somerset'

(NA 59905; PI 583791)

Acer rubrum L. 'Sun Valley'

(NA 59906; PI 583790)

Family: Aceraceae

Hardiness: U.S.D.A. Zones 4–7; 'Somerset' to Zone 8.

Development: 'Somerset' and 'Sun Valley' resulted from controlled crosses made in 1982 by

A.M. Townsend as part of a tree genetics research project examining the

inheritance of fall color and leafhopper resistance. 'Somerset' is a cross of

Acer rubrum 'October Glory' and A. rubrum 'Autumn Flame'. 'Sun Valley' is

a cross of A. rubrum 'Red Sunset' and A. rubrum 'Autumn Flame'. Released

December, 1994.

Significance: 'Somerset' and 'Sun Valley' are red maple cultivars with exceptional, longlasting red fall color and significant levels of tolerance to potato leafhopper—

better than or comparable to many commercially available red maple

cultivars in long-term tests in Maryland and Ohio. 'Somerset' appears to

color well as far south as Georgia.

Description: Height and Width: 'Somerset': 23 feet tall, 11 foot crown spread at 12

years. 'Sun Valley': 21 feet tall, 10 feet wide at 10 years.

Habit: Medium-sized deciduous trees. 'Somerset': moderately ovate crown.

'Sun Valley': symmetrical ovate crown.

Foliage: Brilliant red, consistently good fall color in Oregon, Maryland, and

Ohio. In Maryland, fall color lasts approximately 2 weeks and peaks in the

3rd to 4th week of October, about 1 week before 'October Glory'. Medium

green leaves in summer. 'Somerset': 3.7 inches long, 4.3 inches wide. 'Sun

Valley': 3.8 inches long and wide.

Bark: Light grey and smooth when young; turning dark grey with age.

Flowers: Male, early spring.

Fruit: No fruit produced.

Culture: Adaptable to a wide range of soil conditions. Prefer slightly acid, moist soils.

Performed well in diverse locations from Alabama and Georgia to Michigan

and Oregon.

Propagation: Root easily from softwood cuttings under mist, 1000–3000 ppm IBA, in 4

weeks. Both have been propagated successfully in tissue culture.

Landscape Use: Excellent for lawn, street, highway, or park plantings and as shade trees for

residential sites.

Distribution: Distributed to wholesale commercial propagation nurseries beginning in

1995. Availability expected after 2002.
FastenTech, Inc. and Subsidiaries



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection
with the FastenTech, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Ronald B. Kalich,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael R. Elia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

(1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2). The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |     |  |                      |  |                        
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 8, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Ronald B. Kalich
|                  |  |     |  |                      |  | Ronald B. Kalich       
|                  |  |     |  |                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |    
|Date: May 8, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael R. Elia 
|                  |  |     |  |                      |  | Michael R. Elia        
|                  |  |     |  |                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                  |  |     |  |                      |  | FastenTech, Inc.       



35
#### In the Matter of William H. Silvernail, *an Attorney.*

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless Silver-nail serve appeal papers and pay said costs by second Monday of present term, in which case motion denied.
Order entered July 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00005-CV

PRISCILLA ALIA MCCURDY, Appellant

V.

RANDY LIGGETT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-10001

ORDER

By letter dated June 26, 2019, we directed appellant to file, within ten days, written 

verification she had requested the record and either paid or made arrangements to pay the 

reporter's fee or was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Although we cautioned that 

failure to comply could result in the appeal being submitted without the reporter's record, 

appellant has failed to comply. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). Accordingly, we ORDER the 

appeal submitted without the reporter's record. See id. 

As the clerk's record has been filed, we ORDER appellant to file her brief no later than 

August 14, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
#### Peter J. Flinn and others *v.*The City of Albany.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Opinion by Bockes, J.; Learned, P. J., dissenting.
EXHIBIT 32 - CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION


Exhibit 32.1

Statement Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
OBN Holdings, Inc. (the "Company").  This Certificate is made pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 (the "10-Q Report").

The undersigned certifies that the 10-Q Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.


Date: September 8, 2009                /s/ ROGER N. SMITH
                                       --------------------------------
                                           Roger N. Smith
                                           Chief Executive Officer

Date: September 8, 2009                /s/ LARRY TAYLOR
                                      ---------------------------------
                                           Larry Taylor
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Long Only Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Long Only Commodity Series.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                        
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                            
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Long Only Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                          
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                           
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                               
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Long Only Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: August 14, 2009