alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of UpSNAP, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  September  30,  2005 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic  Report"),
I, Todd M.  Pitcher,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  Chief  Financial  Officer  and
Principal  Accounting  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      1. the Periodic  Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

      and

      2. the information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly  presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to UpSnap, Inc. and will be
retained by UpSnap, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

Dated:  November 15, 2005                    /s/  Todd M. Pitcher
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Todd M. Pitcher

                                             Chief Executive Officer, Chief
                                             Financial Officer and Principal
                                             Accounting Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,499] 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Eaton Corporation, Engine Air Management Operations, Belmond, Iowa. The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-60,499; Eaton Corporation, Engine Air Management Operations, Belmond, Iowa (March 8, 2007).

Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of March 2007. 

Ralph DiBattista, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7-5001 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |                        
|------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date:        |  |                        
|May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal       
|             |  |                        
|             |  | Marc N. Teal           
|             |  | Chief Financial Officer
|             |  |                        
|             |  |                        



*  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4934 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4934

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create an above the line 
          deduction for certain homeowners insurance premiums.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2024

  Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create an above the line 
          deduction for certain homeowners insurance premiums.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeowners Premium Tax Reduction Act 
of 2024''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR HOMEOWNERS INSURANCE PREMIUMS.

    (a) In General.--Part VII of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating section 224 
as section 225 and by inserting after section 223 the following new 
section:

``SEC. 224. HOMEOWNERS INSURANCE PREMIUMS.

    ``(a) Allowance of Deduction.--In the case of an individual, there 
shall be allowed as a deduction an amount equal to so much of the 
qualified insurance premiums paid or incurred during the taxable year 
as does not exceed $10,000.
    ``(b) Qualified Insurance Premiums.--For purposes of this section, 
with respect to an individual, the term `qualified insurance premiums' 
means annual policy premiums paid or incurred for homeowners insurance 
with respect to the principal residence of the individual.
    ``(c) Principal Residence.--For purposes of this section, the term 
`principal residence' has the same meaning as when used in section 
121.''.
    (b) Deduction Allowed in Determining Adjusted Gross Income.--
Section 62(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
inserting after paragraph (21) the following new paragraph:
            ``(22) Homeowners insurance premiums.--The deduction 
        allowed by section 224.''.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part VII of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking the item relating to section 224 and by inserting 
after the item relating to section 223 the following new items:

``Sec. 224. Homeowners insurance premiums.
``Sec. 225. Cross reference.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13297-13298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection

[CBP Dec. 07-08]


Re-Accreditation and Re-Approval of Thionville Surveying Co., 
Inc., as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of re-approval of Thionville Surveying Co., Inc., of New 
Orleans, Louisiana, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 
151.13, Thionville Surveying Co., Inc., 5440 Pepsi Street, Harahan, 
Louisiana 70123, has been re-approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum 
products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils, and to test petroleum 
and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the 
provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this 
entity to conduct laboratory analysis or gauger services should request 
and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or 
approved by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries 
regarding the specific tests or gauger services this entity is 
accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the Bureau of 
Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry 
may also be sent to http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/org_and_operations.xml.

DATES: The re-approval of Thionville Surveying Co., Inc., as a 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on June 23, 2005. The 
next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for June 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene J. Bondoc, Ph.D, or Randall 
Breaux, Laboratories and Scientific Services, Bureau of Customs and 
Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, 
Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.


[[Page 13298]]


    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director Laboratories and Scientific Services.
 [FR Doc. E7-5105 Filed 3-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
EXHIBIT 8



CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

Rio Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd. (the registrant) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Omar Gomez, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Dated: March 29, 2006

/s/ Omar Gomez_____Omar Gomez
Chief Financial Officer
No. 41823.

#### Protests 969129-G, etc., of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

From the testimony it was found that the articles in question are not chiefly used for the amusement of children. They were therefore held dutiable as manufactures of fur at 50 percent under paragraph 1519 as claimed.
No. 42927.

#### Protest 996388-G of Armenian Importing Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

This protest was submitted without evidence in support of the claims made. On the record presented it was overruled.
Exhibit 10.58


 


Summary Translation of Contractual Management/Operation
Agreement


 


Party A: An’kang Longevity
Pharmaceutical Group Chain Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Qiu Haiyin


 


Party A agrees to give contractual right
of its 66 franchises to Party B; the duration of the Agreement is 5 years (2013-03-01 to 2018-02-28). During the contractual period, Party B will fully perform the implementation of authorized management
without any involvement from Party A. Party A shall provide supervision and suggestions. Party A shall own the right of all licenses;
Party B shall have usage right only of such licenses.


 


During the contractual period, Party B
shall pay Party A 30,000 yuan in the first year as management fee, 50,000 yuan in the second year and 6,000 yuan each year after
the third year. The first year’s fee shall be paid upon the signing of this Agreement.


 


Party B is fully responsible for all operating
expenditures as well as the arrangement of 3 staff members from Party A.


 


During the contractual period, Party B
shall have no right to collect management fees from the franchises or Party A has the right to retrieve the operation right.


 


Both parties agrees that the fixed assets
owned by Party A is equal to 35,000 yuan and Party B shall make one-time payment.


 


Party B shall rent Party A’s property
on Bashan Xi Road in the amount of 100,000 yuan/year.


 


Party B shall follow “Drug Administration
Law” during the contractual period and Party A shall not be economically or legally responsible for any liabilities caused
by Party B.


 


For the reason of safe operation, Party
A requires Party B to provide insurance for the warehouse, goods, vehicles and the staff. Party B will provide Party A with copies
of insurance receipts for records.


 


Party A shall be responsible for the company’s
normal GSP certification fee; Party B shall be responsible for the related onsite certification fee.


 


Party B shall pay security of 30,000 yuan
which will returned at the termination of the Agreement.


 


The Agreement was signed on March 1, 2013
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 1, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-12-00091-CR

____________

BERNARD MARIO CLARK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 06-DCR-044740A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s Findings of Fact and 

Conclusions of Law, Recommendation, and Order on appellant’s application for 

post-conviction writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of 

Criminal Procedure.1 An article 11.07 writ of habeas corpus is returnable to the Court of 

Criminal Appeals, and the convicting court’s order may not be appealed to this court. See 

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, §3. Thus, only the Court of Criminal Appeals has 

 

1 Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and this court affirmed his conviction in 2008. 

See Clark v. State, No. 14-08-00025-CR, 2008 WL 5441877 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Dec. 30, 2008, pet. 

ref’d) (not designated for publication). 
2

jurisdiction to review post-conviction habeas corpus proceedings. Ater v. Eighth Court of 

Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex 

rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App.

1995) (holding that article 11.07 provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony 

conviction). The trial court ordered its findings, conclusions, recommendation and order 

to be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

On February 7, 2012, the State filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. On February 17, 2012, appellant filed a pro se document in which he argued 

the merits of his claims but did not address this court’s jurisdiction.

This court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal from the order on appellant’s 

post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, we grant the State’s 

motion and order the appeal dismissed. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Christopher.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0405

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NATHAN BRYCE HARDIN,

Defendant and Appellant. 

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until February 28, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

January 27 2022

01/27/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0405
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Total  Entertainment,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  September 30, 2003as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Sandy J.  Masselli,  Jr.,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ SANDY J. MASSELLI, JR.
                                       --------------------------
                                       Sandy J. Masselli, Jr.

April 1, 2004
#### A. B. Chastain v. State.

174 So. 910.

Opinion Filed May 3, 1937.

*Hugh L. McArthur,*for Plaintiff in Error

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Roy Campbell,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This case must be reversed on the authority of the opinion and decision in.Foy v. State, 115 Fla. 245, 155 So. 657.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

Michael J. Talbot, C.J. 

People of MI v Mohammad Masroor Presiding Judge 

DockctNos. 322280;322281;322282 All Court of Appeals 

Judges 

LC Nos. 14-000869-FC; 14-000858-FC; 14-000857-FC 

The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.21 S(J) 

to resolve the conflict betvveen this case and People of Ml v Alexander Jeremy Sreanhouse, _ 

Mich App _ (Docket No. 318329, issued October 22, 2015), concerning the standards 

applicable to review for reasonableness of sentences constituting departures from the 

recommendations of the sentencing guidelines, and the extent to which remands are required in 

cases involving sentencing decisions before People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015), was 

decided. 

The Court further orders that sections IV, V, VI, and VII of the majority opinion 

in this case released on November 24. 2015. are VACA TED. MCR 7.215(J)(5). 

Appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk's certification 

of this order. Appellee may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of service of appellant's 

brief. 

A true copy entered and certified hy Jerome W. Zimmer Jr .. Chief Clerk. on 

DEC 1 7 2015 

Dace 

~.2- . Ch ~
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6876

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JOHNNY BERNARD MILLER, a/k/a Bernard Miller, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (3:92-cr-00101-GCM) 

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 26, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and 

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Johnny Bernard Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. 

Shappert, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, DC, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Johnny Bernard Miller appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence filed 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Miller, No. 3:92-cr-00101-GCM (W.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2009). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
No. 49723.

#### Protests 98684-K, etc., of Bohemian Distributing Co. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the Third Division,

July 14, 1943

No. 48549.

#### Protests 22156-K, etc., of Columbia Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise, consisting of Bak Hop, lotus nuts (hoi shin lien, hoi pak lin), sui sit, wai san (stick), sar sum (uncut), lo hon qua, yuen yuk, and mok qua, is the same in all material respects as that involved in *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372). It was therefore held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669, as claimed. It was further stipulated that the items consisting of wai san (sliced), yuk ehuk, and sar sum (cut) are the same as certain of the items involved in C. D. 372, *supra,*and were therefore held dutiable as drugs, advanced, at 10 percent under paragraph 34.
#### Commonwealth *v.*Thomas, Appellant.

Submitted November 22, 1968.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Beien and Robeets, JJ.

*Steven H. Shantz*and *Melvm Dildine,*Assistant Defenders, and *Herman I. Pollock,*Defender, for appellant.

*609
      *James D. Crawford,*Assistant District Attorney, and *Arlen Specter,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

January 15, 1969:

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

Order affirmed.