alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      10.33**





**APPENDIX
      TO MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT**


**WITH
      EUROSPARK S.A.**





Signed
      on
      this 12 day of May, 2008.





to
      the
      Management Services Agreement (“the Agreement”) dated as of September 24, 2007,
      by and between Energtek Inc., a company duly registered in the State of Nevada,
      USA with address at 26 East Hawthorne Avenue, Valley Stream, NY 11580, USA
      (the
      "Company") and EuroSpark S.A., a Belgian corporation with address at Avenue
      Louise 109, Brussels 1050 Belgium (the “Provider”); the Company and the Provider
      collectively the “Parties”.




1.
            The
                Parties agree that the Consideration as defined in Clause 4.2 to
                the
                Agreement shall be amended and the monthly payment shall be of Twelve
                Thousand Euros (€ 12,000.00) instead of Six Thousand Six Hundred
                Euros (€ 6,000.00), all the other terms remaining the
                same.




2.
            The
                change in the Consideration shall be applicable starting from the
                payments
                for the services provided during April
                2008.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered the Appendix to
      the
      Agreement on the day and year first written above.











EUROSPARK
      S.A.







/s/
      Nikita Ananov


By:  Nikita
      Ananov


Title:
      Director






ENERGTEK
      INC.










/s/
      Doron Uziel


By:
      Doron
      Uziel


Title:  Treasurer




27
446 A.2d 697

#### Nixon, Appellant v. City of Philadelphia.

*621Argued November 18, 1981.

George J. O’Neill, for appellant; Martin S. Kardon, Assistant City Solicitor, for appellee.

Before McEWEN, MONTEMURO and HOFFMAN, JJ.

Order and judgment affirmed.
EXTENSION
OF MATURITY DATE FOR





PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


This
Extension of Maturity Date for Promissory Note (the “Extension”) dated February 19, 2015, is entered into by and between
CareView-Hillcrest, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (“Maker”) and Rockwell Holdings I, LLC (“Holder”)
(collectively known as the “Parties”).


  


WHEREAS,
pursuant to a certain Master Investment Agreement entered into by the Parties on November 16, 2009, Maker issued to Holder a Promissory
Note in the principal amount of $466,372.50 with respect to the Project (as defined in the Master Investment Agreement) for the
AHS Hillcrest Medical Center, LLC d/b/a Hillcrest Medical Center,


 


WHEREAS,
the Promissory Note has a maturity date of three years from the date payments commenced thereunder, which would make the maturity
date of the Promissory Note May 25, 2013,


 


WHEREAS,
the maturity date of the Promissory Note was subsequently extended to December 31, 2013, then to June 30, 2014, and then to June
30, 2015,


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties have mutually agreed to extend the maturity date to June 30, 2016,


  


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the Parties hereby enter into this Extension
as follows:


 


1.   Extension
of Maturity Date for Promissory Note: The Parties agree to extend the maturity date of the Promissory Note to June 30, 2016 (the
“Extended Maturity Date”).


 


2.   Other
Provisions of the Promissory Note: The Parties agree that all other provisions of the Promissory Note will remain in full force
and effect other than the Extended Maturity Date.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 





	CAREVIEW-HILLCREST, LLC	 	ROCKWELL HOLDINGS I, LLC
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Steve Johnson	 	By:	/s/ Matt Bluhm
	 	Steve Johnson	 	 	Matt Bluhm
	 	Manager	 	 	Managing Member
No. 56489.

protests 170006-K, etc. (New York).

#### Barth Smelting Corporation et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consists of nonferrous scrap metal as contemplated by the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra.*Upon the agreed facts and the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
#### JAMES A. McGOVERN, APPELLANT-PETITIONER, v. FLOYD R. HOFFMAN, DIRECTOR, *ETC.,*RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

*Messrs. Adams, DeRose, Bliablias & Serratelli*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Arthur J. Sills*and *Mr. Marvin M. Wodlinger*for the respondent.

May 14, 1962.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Metalink Ltd. (the
"Company") for the period ending December 31, 2001 (the "Report"), I, Tzvika
Shukhman, Chief Executive Officer & Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 29, 2003

/s/  Tzvika Shukhman
Tzvika Shukhman
Chief Executive Officer &
Chairman of the Board


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Metalink Ltd. and will be retained
by Metalink Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



<PAGE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8185 

To amend the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 to include financial 

criminal activities associated with the facilitation of severe forms of 

trafficking in persons within the factors considered as indicia of serious 

and sustained efforts to eliminate severe forms of trafficking in persons, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2024 

Mr. STEIL (for himself and Ms. DEAN of Pennsylvania) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 

to include financial criminal activities associated with 

the facilitation of severe forms of trafficking in persons 

within the factors considered as indicia of serious and 

sustained efforts to eliminate severe forms of trafficking 

in persons, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Exposing the Financ5 ing of Human Trafficking Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8185 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF FINANCIAL CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES. 

2 Subsection (b) of section 108 of the Trafficking Vic3 tims Protection Act of 2000 is amended by adding at the 

4 end the following new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(13) Whether the government of the country 

6 vigorously investigates, seeks to prevent, and pros7 ecutes financial criminal activities associated with 

8 the facilitation of severe forms of trafficking in per9 sons.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 45029.

#### Protests 29800-K, etc., of Premier Peat Moss Corp. et al. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Peat Import Corp.*v. *United States*(4 Oust. Ct. 181, C. D. 319) the claim for free entry under paragraph 1685 was sustained.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2866931-AUG-201208:47 AM
No. 44069.

#### Protest 5393-K of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

No evidence was offered in support of the claims made. The protest was therefore overruled.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interchange Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Heath B. Clarke, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of Interchange Corporation, and Douglas S. Norman, Chief Financial Officer of Interchange
Corporation, certify, to their knowledge that:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Interchange Corporation. Date: May 13, 2004
    /s/ Heath B. ClarkeHeath B. ClarkeChief Executive Officer and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Douglas S. NormanDouglas S. NormanChief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer) The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Interchange Corporation and will be retained by Interchange Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Arthur S. Locke III, Chief Financial
Officer of Websense, Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Websense, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Websense, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Websense, Inc. for the period covered by the Annual Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 25, 2010

By:

/s/    ARTHUR S. LOCKE IIIArthur S. Locke IIIChief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Websense, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. This written statement accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Websense, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
29–008 

113TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 113–144 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 2609) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED 

AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, AND 

FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

JULY 8, 2013.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BURGESS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 288] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 288, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2609, the Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations 

Act, 2014, under an open rule. The resolution provides one hour of 

general debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The 

resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. The resolution waives points of order against provisions in the 

bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI. The resolution 

provides that the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 

five-minute rule. The resolution authorizes the Chair to accord priority in recognition to Members who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional Record. The resolution provides one 

motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

includes a waiver of clause 4(c) of rule XIII, which prohibits consideration of a general appropriations bill reported by the Committee 

on Appropriations in the House until the third calendar day on 

which printed hearings of the Committee on Appropriations thereon have been available to Members. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
2 

The waiver of clause 2 of rule XXI, which prohibits unauthorized 

appropriations or legislative provisions in an appropriations bill, is 

necessary because the bill contains unauthorized appropriations 

and legislative provisions. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
#### Mary Boyer, an unmarried woman, for use and benefit of DeLos W. Boyer, a minor, by his next friend, Mary Boyer, an unmarried woman, v. DeLos W. Boyer.

182 So. 222.

Order Entered June 14, 1938.

*Carey & Harrison,*for Plaintiff in Error;

No appearance contra.

Per Curiam.

We are advised that the- defendant in error departed this life on March 26th, 1938.

This is a personal action and, therefore, the legal representatives of the deceased should be substituted.

It is, therefore, ordered that Plaintiff in Error proceed to accomplish proper substitution of party ' defendant in error.

So ordered.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5052 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5052

   To prohibit the importation of critical minerals from the Russian 
                              Federation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2024

  Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the importation of critical minerals from the Russian 
                              Federation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF CRITICAL MINERALS FROM THE 
              RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

    (a) In General.--On and after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the importation of critical minerals extracted or otherwise 
produced in the Russian Federation is prohibited.
    (b) Critical Mineral Defined.--In this section, the term ``critical 
mineral'' has the meaning given that term in section 7002(a) of the 
Energy Act of 2020 (30 U.S.C. 1606(a)).
                                 <all>
```
No. 48526.

#### Protest 49304-K of Gargiulo & Amendola, Inc. (Cleveland).

*212Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was found from the record that all the necessary documents had been timely filed and that the percentages of decay were ascertained through an examination of the merchandise in freight cars upon arrival at the port of entry. Following Abstract 47071 it was found that duty should not have been assessed on the decayed and worthless portion of the shipment. The protest was sustained in accordance with the percentages as set out in the decision.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GWENDOLYN HARRIS, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 98 *N. J. Super.*502.

*Messrs. Ruvoldt & Ruvoldt*for the petitioner.

*Mr. James A. Tumulty, Jr.*and *Mr. James G. Lepis*for the respondent.

March 26, 1968.

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a meeting on April 4, 2007, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b ( c) (2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the ACRS, and information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

## Wednesday, April 4, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-10 a.m. 

The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related matters. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. 

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Sam Duraiswamy (telephone: 301-415-7364) between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (ET) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are open to the public. 

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes in the agenda. 

Dated: March 14, 2007. 

Cayetano Santos, 

Acting Branch Chief, ACRS. 

 [FR Doc. E7-5036 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 10.2

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made effective as of the 24th day of March, 2015, by and between KELLY W. GEORGE (the “Executive”) and MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation (the “Company”).

 

BACKGROUND

 

On August 10, 2012, the Company and the Executive entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”).  The Company and the Executive now wish to amend the Employment Agreement as provided herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the terms and conditions set forth below, the parties agree as follows:

 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

 

1.                                      AMENDMENT TO DEFINED TERM.  The term “Commencement Date” as used in the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to be March 24, 2015.

 

2.                                      AMENDMENT TO SECTION 2(B)(I).  The first sentence of Section 2(b)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and amended to read as follows:

 

“During the Employment Period, the Executive shall receive an annual base salary at least equal  to Three Hundred One Thousand Three Hundred Fifty 14/100 ($301,350.14) (the “Annual Base Salary”), which shall be paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices for senior executive officers of the Company as in effect from time to time.”

 

3.                                      CONSTRUCTION.  Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement.  The terms of this Amendment amend and modify the Employment Agreement as if fully set forth in the Employment Agreement.  If there is any conflict between the terms, conditions and obligations of this Amendment and the Employment Agreement, this Amendment’s terms, conditions and obligations shall control.  All other provisions of the Employment Agreement not specifically modified by this Amendment are preserved.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts (including via facsimile or .pdf), each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

 

	
THE EXECUTIVE:  
    	
THE COMPANY:  
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
MACKINAC FINANCIAL   CORPORATION  
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ KELLY W.   GEORGE  
    	
 
    	
By: 
    	
/s/ PAUL D. TOBIAS  
    
	
KELLY W. GEORGE
    	
 
    	
Name: 
    	
Paul D. Tobias  
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title: 
    	
CEO and Chairman
#### E. STANLEY BARRIE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 71 *N. J. Super.*587.

*Messrs. Milton & Keane,*and *Mr. Prospero DeBona*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Stanley W. Greenfield*for the respondent.

March 26, 1962.
No. 51043.

#### Protests 53744-K, etc., of A. Fantis et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese.