alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

ISLAND WINGS LIMITED ) DOCKET DOT-OST-2012- 

 ) 

for an exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 ) 

(Bahamas-U.S. charters) ) 

_________ ________________________________) 

MOTION OF ISLAND WINGS LIMITED 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

John R. Mietus, Jr. 

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 

6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 

 (202) 747-5212 

 (240) 396-5362 fax 

john@mietuslaw.com 

Counsel for 

ISLAND WINGS LIMITED 

August 28, 2012
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

ISLAND WINGS LIMITED ) DOCKET DOT-OST-2012- 

 ) August 28, 2012 

for an exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 ) 

(Bahamas-U.S. charters) ) 

_________ ________________________________) 

MOTION OF ISLAND WINGS LIMITED 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 

Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Department's Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R. § 

302.12, Island Wings Limited respectfully moves to withhold from public 

disclosure the contents of Confidential Exhibit 1 (2 pages total). In 

accordance with Rule 12, the exhibits have been marked "Confidential" and 

are being filed under seal. 

 Confidential Exhibit 1(d) contains the FAA certificate number of the 

President and owner of Island Wings. The Department previously has found 

that confidential treatment of such numbers is appropriate, among other 

reasons because they may be keyed to social security numbers. See, e.g.,

Letter dated September 1, 2006 in Docket DOT-OST-2006-24295. 

 The remainder of Confidential Exhibit 1 contains financial and 

operational information and projections relating to the airline’s proposed 

service. They incorporate private, financial and commercial information of a 
Island Wings 

Motion 

Page 2 

type that is not usually disclosed to the public, and they are being provided to 

the Department solely in support of the carrier's application. Disclosure of 

this information would cause material harm to its competitive position. 

 Thus, the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure 

meets the standards for nondisclosure found in exemption (4) of the Freedom 

of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4), in that it is: (1) commercial or 

financial, (2) obtained from a person outside the government, and (3) 

privileged or confidential. See Gulf & Western Indus., Inc. v. United States, 

615 F.2d 527, 529 (D.C. Cir. 1979); National Parks and Conservation Assoc. v. 

Morton, 498 F.2d 765, 770 (D.C. Cir. 1974). The Department has granted 

confidential treatment to similar information in similar circumstances. See, 

e.g., Inter Island Charters Limited, Notice of Action Taken dated March 16, 

2009 in Docket DOT-OST-2009-0039; BA European Ltd. t/a OpenSkies, 

Order 2008-5-19.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-575V

Filed: August 25, 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

CAMERON MOORE and *

LAURA MOORE, on behalf of minor *

Child, L.M., *

*

Petitioners, * Order Concluding Proceedings, Vaccine 

* Rule 21(a).

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

Gowen, Special Master:

On August 20, 2015, petitioner filed a motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to

Vaccine Rule 21 (a). Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a), this case is hereby

dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is instructed that a judgment

shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(3) .

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas L. Gowen

Thomas L. Gowen

Special Master

1 Because this unpublished order contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to

post it to the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of

2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note

(2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete

medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the

rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I

agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material

from public access.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DONALD W. GARCIA, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Samuel E. Tucht*for the petitioner.

*Mr. John G. Thevos*and *Mr. Archibald Ereiger*for the respondent.

May 28, 1968.

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-922-071310-FI; COC64225] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease COC64225 from Tatonka Oil and Gas Company, LLC for lands in Moffat                               ( print page 13512)                            County, Colorado. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Milada Krasilinec, Land Law Examiner, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at 303.239.3767. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $20.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 18                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease COC64225 effective December 1, 2006, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                 

Dated: March 15, 2007. 

Milada Krasilinec, 

Land Law Examiner.

[FR Doc. E7-5246 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The
Board of Directors
724 Solutions Inc.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-98837, 333-55760 and 333-42142) on Form S-8 of 724
Solutions Inc. of our report dated January 22, 2004 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of 724 Solutions Inc., as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the
December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of 724 Solutions Inc.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Chartered
Accountants
Toronto, Canada
March 12, 2004

---

QuickLinks
# C_2007130EN.01001701.xml

| 12.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/17

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2007/C 130/09)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1), following which no request for a review was received, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Compact disk recordables (CD-Rs) | Taiwan | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2002 (OJ L 160, 18.6.2002, p. 2) | 18.6.2007 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Compact disk recordables (CD-Rs)

Taiwan

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2002 (OJ L 160, 18.6.2002, p. 2)

18.6.2007

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 22.9.2006, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

2

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 22, 2009 

0415 

Order 

 

April 22, 2009 

138550 & (39) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138550 

 COA: 286992 

Berrien CC: 2005-401979-FH 

EDWARD PINKNEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REMAND this case to the Berrien Circuit Court for reconsideration of the conditions of 

the appeal bond. We ORDER the trial court, within 21 days of the date of this order, to 

articulate the specific reasons for imposing a “24/7 curfew” on the defendant. The trial 

court shall file with the Clerk of the Supreme Court a transcript and related documents, if 

any, within 14 days of the completion of the proceedings on remand. 

 We retain jurisdiction.
EXHIBIT 32 - CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION


Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OBN Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

(1)	The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Dated:  February 14, 2005       By: /s/ Roger Neal Smith
        -----------------           ---------------------
                                        Roger Neal Smith
                                        Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  February 14, 2005       By: /s/ Larry Taylor
        -----------------          ------------------
                                        Larry Taylor
                                        Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>
No. 44061.

#### Protest 15634-K of Irving W. Rice Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers similar to those the subject of *Rice*v. *United States*(T. D. 49373). The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained.
#### City of Vero Beach, a municipal corporation, etc., *et al.,*v. State, *ex rel.*James O. Davidson.

179 So. 403.

Opinion Filed February 21, 1938.

*196
      *Vocelle & Mitchell,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Erskine W. Landis*and *Hull, Landis & Whitehair,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.—The

Circuit Court issued an alternative writ of mandamus requiring the officials of the City of Vero Beach, a municipality, to include in the city budget an appropriation for 1936-7 sufficient to pay relator’s past due bonds, interest coupons and time warrants issued by the city, and to include in the annual tax levy of the city for the year 1936, a special tax to be levied upon all of the taxable property in said city, including homesteads, sufficient to pay the relator’s said bonds, interest coupons and time warrants; and to perform other stated acts and duties required by law to carry out the commands of the writ, or to show cause, etc.

A motion to quash the alternative writ was denied. A return and an amended return setting up hardships to the city if the writ be enforced, were eliminated upon motion to strike and demurrer. A peremptory writ in accordance with the alternative writ was ordered and defendants took writ of error.

The final order of the court is in substantial accord with earlier decisions of this Court. The alternative writ relates to tax levies for 1936, and as that period has long since passed, the cause is remanded for the issuance of an appropriate peremptory writ applicable to the current fiscal year of the municipality, after the chancellor has upon proper pleadings and proofs in order to so frame the peremptory writ as to apply equitable principles in enforcing the legal rights of the parties as indicated by later decisions of this Court. See State v. County of Bay, 112 Fla. 687, 151 So. 10; Baskin v. Klemm, 118 Fla. 657, 160 So. 509; State, *197
      *ex rel.,*v. City of St. Petersburg, 126 Fla. 233, 170 So. 730; State, *ex rel.,*v. City of Daytona Beach, 129 Fla. 896, 176 So. 847. See also Christmas v. City of Asbury Park, 78 Fed. (2nd) 1003; United States, *ex rel.*Metzger, v. City of Vero Beach, 90 Fed. (2nd) 70.

Remanded for appropriate proceedings.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00155

- CV

BRANDY LEIGH MOORE

, Appellant

v.

JAY CHRISTOPHER MOOR E

, Appellee

From the 18th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- D201600897

O R D E R

This appeal was referred to mediation on June 14, 2017. Appellant notified the

Court on October 20, 2017 that the parties did not reach a settlement.

Accordingly, the suspension of the appeal is lifted. Appellant’s brief is due 30

days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAMMoore v. Moore Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Suspension lifted

Order issued and filed October 2 5 , 2017
No. 52354.

protests 596906-G, etc. (New York).

#### H. H. Schmidt Glove Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph^’915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
ex10-3.htm


Exhibit 10.3

 



 

 

 

March 23, 2015

 

GulfMark Offshore, Inc.

842 West Sam Houston Parkway North

Suite 400

Houston, Texas 77024

 

Dear Sir:

 

I propose and voluntarily agree to a 5% reduction in my annual base salary effective as of the first full payroll period commencing after this date. I agree that this reduction in my annual base salary will not be a breach of any agreements I have with the company.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

/s/ Richard M. Safier                          

Richard M. Safier

SVP and General Counsel

GulfMark Offshore, Inc.

 

 

Agreed:

 

 

/s/ Quintin V. Kneen                          

Quintin V. Kneen

President and Chief Executive Officer

GulfMark Offshore, Inc.
#### Ed O’Brian and Dan Hansford and Samson Stanley v. State.

181 So. 532.

Opinion Filed May 21, 1938.

*H. V. McClellan,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Tyrus A. Nor-wood,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

To a conviction of the offense of aggravated assault, plaintiffs in error sued out writ of error.

The only contention made as ground for reversal is that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.

*595The evidence was conflicting but the jury within its province resolved the conflicts against the contentions of the accused.

The record discloses substantial evidence to support the judgment and, as the whole record discloses no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Jones, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 893]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. Based on the information received from complainant, the police officer had an objective credible reason to follow defendant and ask him to stop *(see, People v Reyes,*83 NY2d 945, 946, *cert denied*— US —, 115 S Ct 492; *People v Bora,*83 NY2d 531). By dropping a small change purse containing 30 plastic baggies of cocaine, defendant effectively abandoned it *(see, People v Sierra,*83 NY2d 928, 930). The contents of the change purse, coupled with the information received from complainant, provided the police officer with reasonable suspicion to justify detaining defendant for purposes of a showup identification *(see, People v Hicks,*68 NY2d 234). The ensuing showup was not unduly suggestive *999
      *(see, People v Clark,*85 NY2d 886). The subsequent seizure of tangible property from defendant was authorized as a search incident to a lawful arrest *(see, People v Barclay,*201 AD2d 952).

We have reviewed the remaining issue advanced by defendant and conclude that it is without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 4th Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Law-ton, Wesley, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

p0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140329 & (19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140329 COA: 293665 Wayne CC: 06-008239 ANTHONY EARL HARP, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to app eal the December 3, 2009 orde r of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MC R 6.508(D).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT N. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

ESTHER DE LA TORRE, ESTHER DE LA

TORRE 1993 REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS

TRUST, PEDRO DE LA TORRE, dba CASA

LUPE RESTAURANT,

Defendants.

CIV S-04-2671 LKK PAN PS

ORDER 

—NFN—

The October 5, 2005, hearing on plaintiff’s motion for

default judgment is vacated and the matter submitted for decision

on the papers. Should the court later determine oral argument

would be helpful, the matter will be rescheduled for hearing at a

time convenient to the parties and their counsel.

So ordered.

Dated: September 29, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02671-LKK -EFB Document 29 Filed 09/30/05 Page 1 of 1
August 26, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ZACHARIAH HARVEY, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00774-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Tony Philipp, the Chief Executive Officer and Paul Schmidt, the
      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of UPSNAP, INC. (the "Company"), DO HEREBY
      CERTIFY that:





1.  The
      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2008
      (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 13th
      day of August 2008.




/s/Tony
                  PhilippChief
                  Executive Officer(Principal
                  Executive Officer)/s/Paul
                  SchmidtChief
                  Financial Officer and Treasurer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      UpSNAP, Inc. and will be retained by UpSNAP, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.