alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 1000

 1500

 2000

 1000

18 12 06 00

09/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.11 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
Aircraft Weight (Including Battery And Propellers) 1280 g Diagonal Size (Including Propellers) 590 mm Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s Max Descent Speed 3 m/s Hover Accuracy Vertical: +/- 0.1 m (when Vision Positioning is active) or +/- 0.5 m Horizontal: +/- 1.5 m Max Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) Max Altitude Above Sea Level 6000 m Operating Temperature0°C to 40°C GPS Mode GPS/GLONASS Camera Sensor Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels: 12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M) Lens FOV 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8, focus at ∞ ISO Range 100 - 3200 (video) 100 - 1600 (photo) Shutter Speed 8s - 1/8000s Image Max Size 4000 x 3000 Still Photography Modes Single Shot Burst Shooting: 3/5/7 shotsAuto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5 Bracketed Frames at 0.7EV Bias Time - lapse Video Recording Modes Phantom 3 Professional UHD: 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p 24/25/30 FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60 HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60 Phantom 3 Advanced 2.7K: 2704 x1520p 24/25/30 (29.97) FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60 HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60 Supported SD Card Types Micro SD Max capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS - 1 rating required Max Bitrate Of Video Storage Phantom 3 Professional 60 Mbps Phantom 3 Advanced 40 Mbps Supported File FormatsFAT32/exFAT Photo: JPEG, DNG Video: MP4, MOV (MPEG -4 AVC/H.264) Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C Gimbal Controllable Range Pitch - 90° to +30° Stabilization 3 - axis (pitch, roll, yaw) Vision Positioning Max Velocity Less than 8 m/s (when 2 m above ground) Altitude Range 50 cm - 300 cm Operating Range 50 cm - 300 cm Operating EnvironmentSurface with clear pattern and adequate lighting (Lux > 15) Remote Controller Operating Frequency 2.400 GHz - 2.483 GHz Max Distance 2000m (outdoors and unobstructed) Video O utput Port USB Operating Temperature 0°C - 40°C Battery 6000 mAh LiPo 2S Mobile Device Holder For tablet or phone Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)

- 101 dBm ±2 dBm Transmitter Power (EIRP)FCC: 20 dBm CE: 16 dBm Working Voltage 1.2 A @7.4 V Battery Charger Voltage 17.4 V Rated Power Phantom 3 Professional 100 W Phantom 3 Advanced 57 W Intelligent Flight Battery Capacity 4480 mAh Voltage 15.2 V Battery Type LiPo 4SEnergy 68 Wh Net Weight 365 g Max Flight Time Approximately 23 minutes Operating Temperature

- 10°C to 40°C Max Charging Power 100 W App / Live View Mobile App DJI GO EIRP 100mW Power Spectral Density 6.9mW/MHzLive View Working Frequency 2.4GHz ISM Live View Quality 720P @ 30fps (depending on conditions and mobile device) Latency 220ms (depending on conditions and mobile device) Required Operating Systems iOS 8.0 or later Android 4.1.2 or later Recommended Devices iOS: iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air Wi - Fi + Cellular, iPad mini 2, iPad mini 2 Wi - Fi + Cellular, iPad Air 2, iPad Air 2 Wi - Fi + Cellular, iPad mini 3, and iPad mini 3 Wi - Fi + Cellular. This app is optimized for iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, and iPhone 6 Plus Android: Samsung tabs 705c, Samsung S6, Samsung S5, Samsung NOTE4, Samsung NOTE3, Google Nexus 9, Google Nexus 7 II, Ascend Mate7, Nubia Z7 mini, SONY Z3 EXPERIA, MI 3, MI PAD *Support for additional Android devices available as testing and development continues.
Dear Mr . Kerrigan :

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 3394 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe th e aircraft make (s) , model (s) , and type(s)(i.e.

- fixed

- wing, rotorcraft, lighter

than

- air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description (s) should include the maximum weight ( including payload)

. This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s)

. Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov

. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprie tary information ), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/03/15 . I f we do not receive the information , we will close the docket without notifying you further.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 4549

. Sincerely,

/S/

Michael Cameron Program Analyst
#### William Maher, *Respondent, v.*S. Hatch Gould and another, *Appellants.*

Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         64,277
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  68,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    851,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               976,536
<PP&E>                                         320,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (86,264)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,253,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          778,527
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16,742
<OTHER-SE>                                     294,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,243,803
<SALES>                                        2,739,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,739,050
<CGS>                                          2,041,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,195,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               612,752
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             47,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,160,722)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,160,722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,160,722)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.08)



</TABLE>
No. 52675.

protests 42977-K and 983268-G (San Francisco).

#### Rolandelli Co. and De Fremery *&*Co. *v.*United States,

*239Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the creme de cassis the subject of *DeFremery*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 83, C. A. D. 253), and that the alcohol contained in said merchandise was as follows: Entry 4490, 18 percent; entry 4503, 19 percent; and entry 5011, 15 percent. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained as to the items in question and upon the basis of the percentages of alcohol set forth in the stipulation.
Office of Transportation and Air Quality

EPA-420-F-12-081

December 2012

EPA Finalizes Modifications to the 

Transmix Provisions Under the Diesel 

Sulfur Program

EPA is issuing a Final Rule to amend the Transmix Provisions 

Under the Diesel Fuel Program. 

Overview

EPA is amending the requirements under EPA’s diesel sulfur program related to the 

sulfur content of locomotive and marine (LM) diesel fuel produced by transmix 

processors and pipeline facilities. These amendments will reinstate the ability of 

locomotive and marine diesel fuel produced from transmix by transmix processors 

and pipeline operators to meet a maximum 500 parts per million (ppm) sulfur standard outside of the Northeast Mid-Atlantic Area and Alaska and expand this ability 

to within the Northeast Mid-Atlantic Area provided that: the fuel is used in older 

technology locomotive and marine engines that do not require 15 ppm sulfur diesel 

fuel, and the fuel is kept segregated from other fuel. These amendments will provide 

significant regulatory relief for transmix processors and pipeline operators to allow 

the petroleum distribution system to function efficiently while continuing to transition the market to virtually all ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel (ULSD, i.e. 15 ppm sulfur 

diesel fuel) and the environmental benefits it provides.

For More Information

You can access these rules and related documents on EPA’s Office of Transportation 

and Air Quality (OTAQ) Web site at:

www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/dieselfuels/index.htm

and 

www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/alternative-renewablefuels/index.htm

Regulatory Announcement
Regulatory Announcement

2

For more information, please contact EPA’s Fuels Program at:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Transportation and Air Quality (6405J)

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20460

202-343-9755

E-mail: epafuelsprograms@epa.gov
#### William W. Wood, *Respondent, v.*Charles L. Knapp, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Bookes, J.
EXHIBIT 13.1

ALESTRA, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Rolando Zubirán Shetler, the Chief Executive Officer of Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2005, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 3, 2006

/s/ Rolando Zubirán ShetlerRolando Zubirán ShetlerChief Executive Officer
ex1088.htm


Exhibit 10.88



 




UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE




 




	U.S. $323,000.00 	September 28, 2014





 




FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Eos-Petro, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Issuer”), hereby promises to pay to the order of Bacchus Investors, LLC, a California limited liability company (the “Payee”), at such place as the Payee shall direct in writing, the principal sum of Three Hundred Twenty-Three Thousand Dollars ($323,000.00), with interest at 4.00% on the unpaid balance.







All unpaid principal of this Note and accrued interest shall be due and payable on demand. This Note may be prepaid at any time in whole or in part without penalty.  All references to Dollars herein are to lawful currency of the United States of America.







In any action at law or in equity to enforce or construe any provisions or rights under this Note, the unsuccessful party or parties to such litigation, as determined by a court pursuant to a final offer, judgment or decree, shall pay to the successful party or parties all costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by such successful party.







This Note and all actions arising out of or in connection with this Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions of the State of Nevada, or of any other state.







 

 







Eos-Petro, Inc.


A Nevada corporation












By: /s/ Nicholas Konstant


    Nicholas Konstant


    Its: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|May 15, 2006 | /s/ John P. Manning    
|------------ | -----------------------
|             | John P. Manning        
|             | Chief Executive Officer
|             |
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ KENNETH R. KENT,
Petitioner

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent

______________________

2023

- 1329

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DE

- 0752

- 17

- 0171

- I

- 1

.

______________________
O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the pe tition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

February 15, 2023 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: February 15, 2023 Case: 23-1329 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 02/15/2023
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM F. FORREST, a single 

man; WENDY SMITH, a single 

woman; MICHELLE MARTINEZ, a 

single woman; JODI MILLER, a 

married woman; KENNETH 

TURNER, a married man, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 v. 

KEITH SPIZZIRRI; MIRIAM 

SPIZZIRRI, husband and wife; KEN 

MARING; MARING, Unknown; a 

married couple, named as Jane Doe 

Maring; CYNTHIA MOORE; 

MOORE, Unknown; a married couple, 

named as John Doe Moore; 

UNKNOWN PARTY, husband named 

as Pat Doe and wife, named as Jane 

Doe I; JOHN DE LA CRUZ; DE LA 

CRUZ, Unknown; a married couple, 

named as Jane Doe De La Cruz; 

INTELLIQUICK DELIVERY, INC., 

an Arizona corporation; MAJIK 

LEASING LLC, an Arizona 

corporation; MAJIK ENTERPRISES 

I, INC., an Arizona corporation, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No.22-16051 

D.C. No.

2:21-cv-01688-

GMS 

ORDER
2 FORREST V. SPIZZIRRI

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed June 25, 2024

Before: Susan P. Graber, Mark J. Bennett, and Roopali H. 

Desai, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY*

Arbitration

Following the Supreme Court’s opinion in Forrest v. 

Spizzirri, 144 S. Ct. 1173 (2024), reversing and remanding 

to this court, the panel remanded the case to the district court 

for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s 

decision.

COUNSEL

Nicholas J. Enoch, Clara S. Bustamante, Morgan L. 

Bigelow, and Daniel L. Geyser, Lubin & Enoch PC, 

Phoenix, Arizona, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Laurent R.G. Badoux, Robert M. Dato, and Paul A. Alarcón, 

Buchalter A Professional Corporation, Scottsdale, Arizona, 

for Defendants-Appellees.

* This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has 

been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader.
FORREST V. SPIZZIRRI 3

ORDER

The United States Supreme Court reversed and 

remanded this case to this court for further proceedings. See

Forrest v. Spizzirri, --- U.S. ----, 144 S. Ct. 1173, 2024 WL 

2193872 (May 16, 2024). We remand this case to the district 

court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme 

Court’s decision. 

The copy of this order shall act as and for the mandate of 

this court.

REMANDED.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Star Central Corp. (the Company), a Delaware corporation, for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, Jerry L. Morris, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Susanne W. Harris, Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except that the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have not been reviewed by independent public accountants as required by Section 10-01(d) of Regulation S-X, see Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.



The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|    |                       |                                                        |                  
|--- | --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------
|    | Signature             | Title                                                  | Date             
|By: | /s/ Jerry L. Morris   | President and Chief Executive Officer                  | November 14, 2005
|    | Jerry L. Morris       |                                                        |                  
|By: | /s/ Susanne W. Harris | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer | November 14, 2005
|    | Susanne W. Harris     |                                                        |                  



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Star Central Corp. and will be retained by Southern Star Central Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
the Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies,
to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Winton/Graham Series.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                                 
|Robert J. Enck President
and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                                   
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                                    
|Brent Bales Chief Financial
Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of the Winton/Graham Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund                 

Date:
May 12, 2011
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 00-307 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CULTURAL PROPERTY 

 Agreements Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and EL SALVADOR 

Amending and Extending the 

Memorandum of Understanding of 

March 8, 1995 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington March 7, 2000 

and 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

San Salvador March 3 and 4, 2005 

and 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

San Salvador February 24 and 25, 2010 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 EL SALVADOR 

 

 Cultural Property 

 Agreements amending and extending the 

 Memorandum of Understanding of 

 March 8, 1995. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at 

 Washington March 7, 2000; 

 Entered into force March 7, 2000. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at 

 San Salvador March 3 and 4, 2005; 

 Entered into force March 4, 2005. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at 

 San Salvador February 24 and 25, 2010; 

 Entered into force February 25, 2010.
#### In the Matter of the Attorney-General *v.*The Atlantic Mutual Life Insurance Company.

Order denying motion to require receiver to advertise for claims for six months affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.