alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven L. Watson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory M. Swalwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ Steven L. Watson


Steven L. Watson


Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Gregory M. Swalwell


Gregory M. Swalwell


Chief Financial Officer








August 4, 2009








Note:  The certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.
MEMORANDUM 

TO: Nhan Nguyen 

 

FROM: Maj’d El-Zoobi 

 

DATE: December 2, 2008 

SUBJECT: Review of Inhalation Monitoring Study for of P-07-601 

The submitter of P-07-601 submitted the subject matter study as an alternative assessment to 

CEB’s assessment of inhalation exposure for of P-07-601. 

The review of this study was tasked to ERG’s industrial hygienist who was provided with 

guidelines for conducting the review that are based on your directive on this matter which you 

sent to me on 8/12/08. 

ERG’s report on the study, which contains a brief description of the study and its results, as well 

as ERG’s review of the study, is available on the CBI LAN at 

J:\postfocus\FY2007\P07601.sr\CEB documents and is titled “ Inhalation Monitoring Study 

Review_112108.doc”. 

Exposure values reported in the study ranged from to CEB’s current assessed 

inhalation exposure level at the site is ppm (hr TWA) and is in accordance with CEB’s " 

Generic Scenario”. The assessment in the generic scenario is based on a mass balance model. 

Based on ERG’s review of the submitter’s study, I assess the submitter’s study to be 

unacceptable for use in assessing inhalation exposure at sites due to deficiencies in the study 

in regard to number of samples taken, the period of time over which samples were collected, and 

the sample collection method. 

It is recommended that CEB’s current assessed inhalation exposure level at the site be 

maintained as the assessed value with the added clarification that ppm is actually, according to 

the original reference for the Generic Scenario, the estimated value for the reasonable worst case, 

while the estimated value for the likely exposure case is ppm.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4872 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt sports betting 

from the tax on authorized wagers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2024 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself and Mrs. HYDE-SMITH) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

sports betting from the tax on authorized wagers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Withdrawing Arduous 

5 Gaming Excise Rates Act’’ or the ‘‘WAGER Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPORTS BETTING EXEMPT FROM THE EXCISE TAX 

7 ON AUTHORIZED WAGERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4402 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following new paragraph: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4872 IS

1 ‘‘(4) SPORTS BETTING NOT PROHIBITED UNDER

2 STATE LAW OR TRIBAL COMPACT.—On any wager 

3 which— 

4 ‘‘(A) is not prohibited under— 

5 ‘‘(i) the law of the State in which ac6 cepted, or 

7 ‘‘(ii) an approved Tribal-State gaming 

8 compact executed in accordance with the 

9 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 

10 2701 et seq.), and 

11 ‘‘(B) is placed with respect to any sporting 

12 event.’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 this section shall apply to wagers placed after the date 

15 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EX 31-1

CERTIFICATION

I, Arthur Viola, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of INFe-Human
Resources, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information;

and

b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date: July 19, 2004

/s/  ARTHUR VIOLA
________________________
Arthur Viola
Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the annual report of Korea Thrunet Co., Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
          the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


         Date: July 15, 2004           By:    /s/ Seog Won Park
                                           ----------------------
                                       Name: Seog Won Park
                                       Title:   Receiver / CEO



         Date: July 15, 2004           By:    /s/ Kyu Bae Park
                                           ----------------------
                                       Name: Kyu Bae Park
                                       Title:   CFO
                                       (currently performs similar functions
                                       of a chief financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Korea Thrunet Co., Ltd., and will be retained by Korea Thrunet Co.,
Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Lev Zaidenberg, the Chief
      Executive Officer of
      Energtek Inc. (the “Company”), certify, under the standards set forth and solely
      for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to each of their knowledge, the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 14, 2008








By: /s/
      Lev Zaidenberg


Name: Lev
      Zaidenberg


Title: Chief
      Executive Officer and Director


(Principal
      Executive Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


25
#### In the Matter of Lloyd M. Lasser et al., Petitioners, v Margarita Rosa, as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of T. W., Respondent.

[634 NYS2d 188]

—Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated March 31, 1994, which, after a hearing, found that the petitioners, a dentist and a dental partnership, had discriminated against the complainant because she was perceived to be at risk for HIV infection and awarded the complainant $25,000 in compensatory damages.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, with costs, and the determination is annulled.

After the complainant, who tested positive for the HIV virus, filed a complaint against the petitioners Lloyd Lasser, who is a dentist, and the Newburgh Dental Group, with the New York State Division of Human Rights (hereinafter the SDHR), a hearing was held to determine whether Dr. Lasser did in fact discriminate against the complainant in violation of Executive Law § 296 (2) (a). The Administrative Law Judge who heard the case and whose findings were adopted by the Commissioner of the SDHR determined that certain acts of Dr. Lasser constituted a refusal to treat the complainant based on her status as a person who was perceived to be at risk for the HIV infection.

Under Executive Law § 296 (2) (a), it is an unlawful discriminatory practice for an owner of any "place of public accommodation” to withhold from or deny to any person, because of any disability, any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities, or privileges thereof. However, since Dr. Lasser was a private practitioner and operated on an appointment basis in a privately-owned building, his dental office did not operate as a clinic *(see, Matter of Sattler v City of N. Y. Commit, on Human Rights,*180 AD2d 644), and therefore, did not constitute a "place of public accommodation” within the meaning of Executive Law § 296 (2) (a) *(see, Matter of Cahill v Rosa,*220 AD2d 585).

Because the petitioner’s dental practice was not a "place of public accommodation” *(see, Matter of Cahill v Rosa, supra),*there was no violation of Executive Law § 296 (2). Therefore, the petition must be granted.

In light of our determination, the remaining contentions of the respondent are academic. Thompson, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          45,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  791,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                   218,929
<INVENTORY>                                    175,147
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               793,173
<PP&E>                                         136,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,270,929
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          782,372
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,750
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,958,808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,270,929
<SALES>                                      2,302,015
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,302,015
<CGS>                                        1,299,093
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,317,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,078,598)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,079,398)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,079,398)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)


</TABLE>
No. 47371.

#### Protests 37697-K, etc., of Border Brokerage Co., Inc. (Seattle).

*378Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which imported, and that no addition should have been made for the planing, tonguing, and grooving. Protests sustained to this extent.
Before the Third Division,

June 8, 1959

No. 63139.

#### Desco Shoe Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 58/5602 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
#### ROBERT J. NEILLEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. JOSEPH P. WINBERRY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Messrs. Breslin & Breslin*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Bellinger & Chester*for the respondent.

June 11, 1962.
#### Elizabeth Benlian, Respondent, v Herbert Vartabedian, Defendant. Julius Blaushield, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

June 5, 1978

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Julius Blaushield,*appellant *pro se. Maurice Abrahams*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order of the court below (see 91 Misc 2d 968) affirmed, without costs.

*64While we disagree with the lower court’s finding that plaintiff was not entitled to the appointment of a receiver, nevertheless we agree with its determination denying the receiver’s motion to fix compensation, since special circumstances have not been shown to exist *(East Chatham Corp. v Iacovone,*25 AD2d 622; CPLR 5228; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, pars 8004.06, 8004.09).

Concur: Pino, P. J., and Weinstein, J.; Thompson, J., taking no part.
1 Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Rich Goodwyn <rich@orionaerial.com>

Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 7:28 AM

To: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Subject: Request for Information - FAA-2015- 2336 (Phantom Series Clarification)

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Mr Ngo,

Thanks for the call yesterday. Below is the information I hope you need to complete my

petition. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Very Respectfully,

Rich

Rich Goodwyn

Chief Pilot

Orion Aerial Solutions

703

‐ 606

‐ 3978

rich@orionaerial.com

www.orionaerial.com

Because perspective matters.



### Phantom Series means:

Phantom 3 Professional

Phantom 3 Advanced

Phantom 3 Standard

Phantom 2 Vision +

Phantom 2 Vision

Phantom 2

Phantom 1
EXHIBIT 12.5

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F  of Rio Narcea Gold Mines, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Amended Annual Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The Amended Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the Amended Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date:  June 26, 2003





/s/ Omar Gómez



Omar Gómez

Chief Financial Officer
No. 51776.

#### Protests 470423-G, etc., of Viscose Co. et al. (Philadelphia).

*214Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of long staple cotton cloth of the same kind in all material respects as that passed upon in *Perseverance Import Corp.*v. *United States*(T. D. 49290), and that the proper deduction in duty for the weight of sizing in the cotton cloth in question is as follows: for yarn No. 31, 2.10 percent; for yarn No. 34, 5.25 percent; for yarn No. 52, 7.50 percent; and for yarn No. 87, 6 percent. It was accordingly held that for the purpose of assessing the additional duty of ’10 cents per pound under paragraph 924, an allowance and deduction should be made for the weight of the sizing in the cotton cloth as indicated in the above-mentioned yarn numbers.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Douglas S. Norman, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Interchange Corporation, certify
that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Interchange Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    The small business issuer other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, is made known to
us by others within the small business issuer, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting. Date: May 13, 2005
    /s/ Douglas S. NormanDouglas S. NormanChief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)
Before the Second Division,

December 20, 1955

No. 59596.

protests 247833-K, 260323-K, and 259773-K (New York).

#### H. T. Kennedy Co., Inc., and Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Laweence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Aladdin” rail lubricators and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *H. T. Kennedy Co., Inc.,*and *Daniel F. Young, Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 68, C. D. 1637), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### SUZANNE FIRRMAN, BY JOHN FIRRMAN, GUARDIAN *AD LITEM, ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. MARIE BARNETT, *ET ALS.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

*Mr. Isadore I. Zlotlcin*and *Mr. Roger K. Bentley, II*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Campbell, Mangini, Foley & Lee*and *Mr. Michael J. Cernigliaro*for the respondents.

February 13, 1968.

Denied.