alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Notice of Product Development

    Although not required, notice is hereby given that the Federal 
Railroad Administration (FRA) has received a Notice of Product 
Development (NPD) from the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP), 
pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 
236.913(d)(1) for Phases 1 and 2 of the development of a Communications 
Based Train Control (CBTC) system. A brief summary of the NPD, 
including the party submitting it, and the requisite docket number are 
as follows.

Union Pacific Railroad Company

[Waiver Docket Number FRA-2007-27322]

    UP submitted an NPD of its CBTC system for Phases 1 and 2. The 
proposed CBTC system is a safety-critical, microprocessor-based system, 
designed to provide the enforcement of movement authorities and speed 
restrictions for CBTC-equipped locomotives, and provide the locomotive 
engineer an assist function to optimize train handling. Phase 1 of the 
CBTC is a non-vital safety overlay based on BNSF's Electronic Train 
Management System, previously approved under Docket Number FRA-2006-
23687. Phase 2 of the CBTC implements the functionality of Phase 1 
using a vital onboard architecture.
    Interested parties are invited to review the notification and 
associated documents at the following locations:
    <bullet> Web site: http://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for 
a simple search on the DOT electronic docket site; and/or
    <bullet> DOT Central Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401 on the 
plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.
    All documents in the public docket are also available for 
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web 
site, http://dms.dot.gov.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments 
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual 
submitting the comment (or signing the comment on behalf of an 
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's 
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on 
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78). The Statement 
may also be found at http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 7, 2007.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
 [FR Doc. E7-4581 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                         <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0                     245
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                     245
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                     245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,910                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           477                      30
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,387)                     215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                     245
<SALES>                                              0                 203,419
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                 203,419
<CGS>                                                0                  63,565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,115                 203,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                   1,056
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,155)                 (1,365)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                   (298)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,155)                 (1,067)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,155)                 (1,067)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.001)                  (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)                  (.001)





</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1
 GTx, Inc.  Computation of Ratio (Deficiency) of Earnings Available to Cover Fixed Charges
 Three Months Ended
    
    
    Year Ended December 31,March 31, 2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Income (loss):Pretax income (loss) from continuing operations (1)
    
    $
    44,339
    
    
    $
    (46,494
    )
    
    $
    (51,780
    )
    
    $
    (40,359
    )
    
    $
    (35,510
    )
    
    $
    (36,839
    )Fixed charges (from below)
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    104
    
    
    
    89
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    32Total income (loss)
    
    
    44,371
    
    
    
    (46,390
    )
    
    
    (51,691
    )
    
    
    (40,324
    )
    
    
    (35,478
    )
    
    
    (36,807
    )Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Estimated interest portion of rent expenses
    
    
    28
    
    
    
    104
    
    
    
    89
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    32Total fixed charges
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    104
    
    
    
    89
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    32Coverage deficiency
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (46,494
    )
    
    $
    (51,780
    )
    
    $
    (40,359
    )
    
    $
    (35,510
    )
    
    $
    (36,839
    )Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1,386.6
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
 
 (1)
    
    Pretax income from continuing operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 includes the recognition as
collaboration revenue of all of the remaining $49.9 million
of unamortized revenue that was deferred as of December 31,
2009 related to the Companys global exclusive license and
collaboration agreement (the Collaboration Agreement)
with Merck & Co., Inc. (Merck), as well as the final
payment of $5.0 million of research and development cost
reimbursement that will be received under the Collaboration
Agreement from Merck in late 2010, the accelerated
recognition of which resulted from the termination of the
Collaboration Agreement in March 2010.
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Tony Philipp, the Chief Executive Officer and Paul Schmidt, the
      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of UPSNAP, INC. (the “Company”), DO HEREBY
      CERTIFY that:





1. The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
      (as amended by amendment no.2) (the “Report”), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
      15 th day of
      September 2006.





/s/
      Tony Philipp


Tony
      Philipp


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





/s/
      Paul Schmidt


Paul
      Schmidt


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      UpSNAP, Inc. and will he retained by Upsnap, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 46196.

#### Protests 984611-G, etc., of Nelson Bead Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 59058.

protests 237217-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### China Dry Goods Co. and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of floor coverings, composed wholly or in chief value of rush and not of grass or of rice straw, which do not have a felt base, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstracts 57889 and 57890, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report of GEOPHARMA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Carol Dore-FalconeCarol Dore-FalconeVice President and Chief Financial OfficerJune 29, 2007
### Table H-11-1. OTC CMAQ Air Quality Model Configuration

Science Options Configuration Details/Comments

Model CMAQ Version 4.5
Horizontal Grid Mesh 36km/12km 36-km grid 145x102 cells 12-km grid 172x172 cells
Vertical Grid Mesh 22 Layers

Grid Interaction One-way nesting Boundary Conditions GEOS-CHEM
Emissions
Baseline Emissions Processing SMOKE (Version 2.1) model configuration MM5 meteorology input to SMOKE & CMAQ Sub-grid-scale Plumes No Plume –in-Grid (PinG) Chemistry Gas Phase Chemistry CBM-IV

Aerosol Chemistry AE3/ISORROPIA Secondary Organic
Aerosols Secondary Organic Aerosol Model (SORGAM)
Aerosol Mass
Conservation Patch Yes Schell et. al., (2001)

Cloud Chemistry RADM-type aqueous chemistry Includes sub-grid cloud processes

N 2 O 5 Reaction Probability 0.01-0.001 Meteorological Processor MCIP Version 3.0 Horizontal Transport

Eddy Diffusivity Scheme K-theory with Kh grid size dependence Multi-scale Smagorinsky (1963) approach

Vertical Transport Eddy Diffusivity Scheme K-theory Diffusivity Lower Limit Kzmin = 1.0 Planetary Boundary Layer No Patch

Deposition Scheme M3dry Directly linked to Pleim-Xiu Land Surface Model parameters
Numerics Gas Phase Chemistry
Solver Euler Backward Iterative (EBI) solver Hertel et. Al. (1993) EBI solver ~2x faster
than MEBI
Horizontal Advection
Scheme Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) scheme
Simulation Periods 2002
Platform Linux Cluster
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  annual  report of Pacific  Fuel Cell  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2005 (the "Report"),  I,
the  undersigned,  in the capacity  and on the date  indicated  below,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C./  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  April 7, 2005                     s/George Suzuki
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          George Suzuki, Chief Executive Officer
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** WASHI NGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY

RESPONSE Note to docket December 23 , 2014 Re: EPA- HQ - SFUND -2014 - 0733 - Technical Amendment to Update Data Management S ystem Nomenclature, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking On December 2, 2014, the EPA receive d the following comment on the N otice of P roposed R ulemaking (NPRM) for the technical amendment to the N ational Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan ( N CP ) to update the data management system nomenclature , “The authority section for this regulation cites 33 USC 1321(c)(2). This is incorrect. That section is about Discharges Posing Substantial Threat to Public Health or W elfare. The correct citation shou ld be to 33 USC 1321(d) which is about the National Contingency Plan. W hen the executive branch regulates, it is required to state the authority for its regulation. ” In response, the commenter correctly identified the first authority citation as pertainin g to discharges to waterways which pose a substantial threat to public health and welfare , which is relevant to the implementation of the NCP . However, the commenter did not consider the remainder of the authority citation, the second of which, 42 USC 9601 - 9657, includes the entire NCP at 42 USC 9605. The EPA was well within its stated authority to amend the NCP for this data system nomenclature update. Further, the NPRM states that if adverse comments are received on this action, the EPA will withdraw the proposed rule and address all relevant public comments before proceeding with a final rule. Because the above comment does not address the action to update the NCP’s data system nomenclature, and because the EPA clearly stated its authority for this regul ation, we are not considering this an adverse comment and are proceeding with the final rule.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lpath, Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott R. Pancoast, President and Chief Executive Officer and I, Gary J. G. Atkinson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Corporation.

Date: August 12, 2010



/s/    Scott R. PancoastScott R. PancoastPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/    Gary J.G. AtkinsonGary J.G. AtkinsonVice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lpath, Inc. and will be retained by Lpath, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Lpath, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, (the
Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.



/s/    CAROLE R. WRIGHTName:

Carole R. WrightDate:

February 28, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gerald Wright, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 480]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered May 26, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was prejudiced by the trial court’s jury instructions is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245,

*394250), and, in any event, without merit. The jury charge, as given, adequately and properly instructed the jury on the elements of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree *(see,*2 CJI[NY] PL 165.40, at 1040A-1040E). Sullivan, J. P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES
OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection
with the Annual Report of Platina Energy Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      July 25, 2008
                By:
                /s/ 
      Blair J. MerriamName:
      Blair J. MerriamTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
#### Penson & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7299.

Invoice dated Longton, England, June 1944.

Certified June 1944.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 23, 1944.

Entry No. 706857.

(Decided June 19, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P, Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF PANOLA COU NTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 3rd day of February, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was
determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

In the Matter of the Marriage of Everett Alton Taylor, Jr., and Dochia Ann Taylor and In the Interest of R.N.T., a Child No. 06

- 14

- 00061

- CV

Trial Court No. 2013

- 093

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with

the seal t hereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 23rd day of April , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk