alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CEO CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Kip McClanahan, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: June 3, 2004
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  /s/ Jonathan H. CohenName: Jonathan H. Cohen Date:   August 8, 2017
No. 51456.

#### Protests 126338-K, etc., of Vintage Wines, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the First Division,

April 6, 1945

No. 50108.

#### Protests 37616-K, etc., of Columbia Co. et al. (San Francisco).

*233Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the items in question consist of medicinal preparations the same in all material respects as the merchandise passed upon in *Wing Duck Co.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 133, C. D. 446) and *Shun Yuen Hing*& *Co.*v. *United States*(11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 331, T. D. 39143), which records were incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the merchandise was found to be a medicinal preparation and therefore not subject to the internal revenue tax. The protests were sustained to this extent.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,319-01

IN RE DWIGHT WOLF, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. CR-10111-2014 IN THE 411TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TRINITY COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 411th District Court of Trinity County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Trinity

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
-2-

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Trinity County. Should the

response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was

served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for

leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the

appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: December 10, 2014

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          50,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,083
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,843
<PP&E>                                          14,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,612
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          821,086
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,139
<OTHER-SE>                                   (520,739)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,486
<SALES>                                        847,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               847,606
<CGS>                                          370,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  853,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    94
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,667)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.004)


</TABLE>
# C_2007311EN.01001901.xml

| 21.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/19

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to national regional investment aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 311/13)

| Aid No | XR 184/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Malta |
| Region | Malta |
| Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement | Encouragement of Tourism Activities |
| Legal basis | Administrative Measure as part of Malta's Rural Development Programme (CCI no 2007MT06RPO001) based on Articles 52(a)(iii) and 55 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Annual budget | MTL 5 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | 30 % |
| In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1.1.2008 |
| Duration | 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | Limited to specific sectors |
| NACE H055 and O092 |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry for Rural Affairs and the Environment Rural Development Department |
| National Agricultural Research and Development Centre |
| Ngieret Road |
| Għammieri — Marsa |
| Malta |

Aid No

XR 184/07

Member State

Malta

Region

Malta

Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement

ad hoc

Encouragement of Tourism Activities

Legal basis

Administrative Measure as part of Malta's Rural Development Programme (CCI no 2007MT06RPO001) based on Articles 52(a)(iii) and 55 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Annual budget

MTL 5 million

Maximum aid intensity

30 %

In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1.1.2008

Duration

31.12.2013

Economic sectors

Limited to specific sectors

NACE H055 and O092

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry for Rural Affairs and the Environment Rural Development Department

National Agricultural Research and Development Centre

Ngieret Road

Għammieri — Marsa

Malta

Internet address of the publication of the aid scheme

www.agric.gov.mt

Other information

—

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Basset Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  March 11, 2008 /s/Cosmo Palmieri     President
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No.'s 333-89054, 333-62902 and 333-38724) pertaining to the Academic
Systems Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan (1992 Plan), the 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan (2000 Plan) and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (2000 ESP
Plan) of our report dated February 20, 2003, included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Lightspan, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2003.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Diego, California
April 28, 2003
No. 45009.

#### Protest 16437-K of A. Schnuerer, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Steinberger*v. *United States*(3 Cust. Ct. 187, C. D. 229) the chamois leather in question was held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1530 (c) and T. D. 48316 as claimed.
**Amendment
      to Billing Services Agreement**




**Between
      American Surgical Assistants, Inc. and Med-Pro, Inc.**




Effective
      November l, 2007 the following billing procedures are added to the procedures
      performed by Med-Pro and its employees:




1.  Filing
      and sorting of response to initial claims.


2.  Filing
      and response to initial E.O.B.'s .


3.    
      Sorting and permanent filing of closed claims.




For
      the
      performance of additional procedures Med-Pro shall be entitled to a monthly
      compensation of $6,000,00 in addition to the fee included in the original
      agreement.




Med-Pro
              ASA,
                  Inc./s/
              /s/
                *ZAK
                W. ELGAMAL*
Case No. 5,366.

#### GERNON v. BOOCALINE.

[2 Wash. C. C. 199.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

April Term, 1808.

Pleading in Equity — Replication Denying Allegations in Plea — Answer—Plea in Avoidance.

1. Where the replication denies all the allegations in the plea, the plea must be supported by evidence.

2. If an answer to any particular charge in the bill deny the same, it must be opposed by the plaintiff, by two witnesses, or by one and circumstances.

3. A plea in avoidance of. and not responsive to the bill, stands for nothing as evidence of the facts stated in it.

{Cited in Tilghman v. Tilghman, Case No. 14,045.]

In equity. Plea to the jurisdiction of the court, (sworn to,) that the plaintiff was, at the time of filing his bill, a citizen of the state of Pennsylvania. To the'plea, a general replication was filed. The deposition of one witness was read, who proved that the plaintiff, in the summer of 1807, removed into the state of New-Jersey, with his family, sold part of his furniture after his leaving this state, and removed the rest to his place of residence at Burlington.

M. Levy, for defendant,

observed, that the plea, being sworn to, could not be overruled by the deposition of one witness.

1

 [Originally published from the MSS. of Hon. Bushrod Washington, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard Peters, Jr., Esq.]

WASHINGTON, Circuit Justice.

The replication having denied all the matter of the plea, the latter must be supported by evidence. If an answer, responsive to any charge in the bill, deny the same, it must be opposed on the part of the complainant, (who makes this part of the answer evidence, by calling upon the defendant to give evidence against himself,) by two witnesses, or by one' witness, with the addition of circumstances. But a plea is always in avoidance of the bill, and never responsive to it It of course stands for nothing, as evidence of the. facts stated in it. Plea overruled.

[See Case No. 5,367.]
## CBIC Control Number 

# 356718 RECEIVED 

# QPONT~ 1)P-P:F-CB[ p. 1



# 2013OCT 29 AM10: 52

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts

Chambers Works Deepwater, NJ 08023 

# EPA October 18, 2013 04 20' Director, Chemical Control Division 

# DOCKET CENTER US Environmental Protection Agency 

# Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics EPA East Room 4146 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC20004 

# Re: EPA - HQ- OPPT - 2003 - 0012 DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No
. NJ0005100 PFOA Data Submittal - Outfall DSN662Weekly Grab Samples September 2013 Sample Data Dear Chemical Control Division: Attached please find summaries of PFOAanalytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662Ain September 2013
. In accordance with the current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these results are provided to NJDEPon a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports
. The enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results fromthis monitoring period
. Sincerely,

. 

# Albert Patrick O'Neill Unit Manager-Site Manufacturing Systems/Fluoroproducts DuPont Chambers Works



# APO/cle Enclosures

# Copy to:

Document Control Office US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics EPAEast 

# Room 6428 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC20460 Ms
. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) Principal Environmental Engineer NJDEPDivision of Water Quality Bureau of Point Source Permitting - Region 2 401 E
. State Street P.O

. Box 029 Trenton, NJ 08625-0029

## ma L CM

0")

_ N O N N U .N C 4) Q O_ O 

# 21, N N 

# E (0
7 M N ° cV

o ED M OO ~- M N ~ Q m ~ - ¢ o c~i w N ~ !-+ U' N M d N c Y ~ J

U (D (O Ca y ~ ,f N ~ J N o .- ~ N m O- U N

_ U m M O O~ N N

~ N d p,

9 d Q C7 M N N U V u~ a
~ ° U NO J a 0=a (Op N N ~ _ d U N N p~ M O O- O ¢ O

N O ' ~ ro U N CJ J 7 L N ~ O

. d , - (O ~O .O Q N ~

0 ~ y 7 p

~ a U C N S] U m N

a v ro h

in 0 ' O N N E U m M o o ~ ~ '~ ~ o ro c o ~ U a ~ n c ¢ o~ C~ ~ a ~ e
- 3a : ° o ~ ~ 3 d ° ~o C7 0~ o N o 0 c 0 0 ~= a m0 o .0

_ N ~ o m nv

### d

7, 

## C3 ~t 0o ~ c o R m

~ 2 D Q M

E o ~ 0 m . 

### m M_ o o~ ~ a

ii - E 

### o N p3 c ro v Cr 

### "o o ro 

### t a>

H o -o m ¢ ¢

### d~ vi ¢ ii o ' v 'o Z =

E " E 3 y a ~' w

° C7 o~ O

~- J oi 

### E o

Co Co O II II 0

=~ 2 d 0 U

## .2 Z ~~ J 

### u ii v p CY En ` ¢ O U ro 

### z ~ z 0 0 N m z °' ro .r . . . w a

### o a Em o 0.2 m ~ = - y O 7 mp H_O
HO H

+~ J 'C a7 7 7 N ¢ 

### N O C 

## a lL 

## a M M O p_ N N M N N N~ O N N ro o`~ N b Y 

### 3 U O T a 0 U



### m a

m
No. 53034.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 29208-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 1 9, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00533

- CR

Richard CRUZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR8891 Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file is granted in part. We order counsel for appellant, Daniel De La Garza, to file the appellant’s brief by April 9, 2018. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a timely motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justif ying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generall y consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of March, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
January 10 th 2011

David Putney, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 Mail Drop D243

- 02

Attention: Docket ID Number EPA

– HQ

– OAR

– 2011

– 0797.

RE: National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants

Dear Mr. Putney , Following our discussion by phone on January 10 th , The Aluminum Association is requesting a 15 day extension of the comment period for the EPA proposed rule for Primary Aluminum Maximum Achievable Control Technology ( P MACT) standards and Residual Risk requirements under the Clean Air Act Amendments

. The Aluminum Association and it s member companies are currently engaged in developing comments on EPA ’s proposal, and request the extension in order to gather screening data to better understand the impact of the pr oposal on primary aluminum facilities

. Thank you for your time and consideration in addressing this important issue. Please contact my office (703

- 358

- 2981 or Cjohnson@aluminum.org ) with questions or for further information.

Sincerely,

Charles D. Johnson VP, Environment Health & Safety
No. 59612.

protests 161435-K, etc. (New York).

#### Chekiang Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

It was stipulated that the articles in question consist of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and various kinds of trays, the composition of which is the same in all material respects as the merchandise involved in *Ignaz Strauss*& *Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), *The Fan Co.*v *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of the decisions cited, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of brass, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 35 percent under the provision in paragraph 339, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753), for household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of copper, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; and (3) the items marked with the letter “C” at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 339, as modified, *supra,*for household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of pewter, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4994 

To modify the boundary of the Vicksburg National Military Park in the 

State of Mississippi, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To modify the boundary of the Vicksburg National Military 

Park in the State of Mississippi, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vicksburg National 

5 Military Park Boundary Modification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VICKSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK CONVEY7 ANCE AND BOUNDARY MODIFICATION. 

8 (a) CONVEYANCE.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Inte10 rior (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4994 IS

1 convey to the State of Mississippi (referred to in this 

2 Act as the ‘‘State’’) without consideration subject to 

3 any terms and conditions that the Secretary deter4 mines to be appropriate, the Federal land described 

5 in subsection (b). 

6 (2) DESCRIPTION OF FEDERAL LAND.—The 

7 Federal land referred to in subsection (a) is the fol8 lowing: 

9 (A) The parcel of approximately 3.66 acres 

10 of National Park Service land within the bound11 ary of Vicksburg National Military Park, as de12 picted on the map entitled ‘‘VICK–2024–01’’, 

13 to be used by the State as a welcome center or 

14 other public use. 

15 (B) The approximately 6.48 acres of Na16 tional Park Service land within the boundary of 

17 Vicksburg National Mark Park, as depicted on 

18 the map entitled ‘‘VICK–2024–02’’, to be used 

19 by the State an interpretive center or a mu20 seum or other public use. 

21 (b) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.—On conveyance of a 

22 parcel of Federal land under subsection (a), the Secretary 

23 shall modify the boundary of the Vicksburg National MiliVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:52 Sep 12, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4994.IS S4994

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4994 IS

1 tary Park to reflect the conveyance of the parcel of Fed2 eral land. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS