alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release Nos. 33-8786, 34-55456; File No. 4-515] 

# AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of roundtable meeting.

# SUMMARY:

On Monday, March 19, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a roundtable discussion on creating interactive data to serve investors. The event begins with remarks from SEC Chairman Cox and an address by Vanguard Group Chairman and CEO John J. Brennan on the use of interactive data by public companies and mutual funds to improve disclosure for individual investors. Following Mr. Brennan's remarks, John W. White, Director of the Commission's Division of Corporation Finance, will discuss the use of interactive data to create better disclosure documents. The roundtable will also feature a panel discussion on the benefits, including potential cost savings, of preparing financial reports using interactive data written in a computer language called XBRL. Panelists will include executives at public companies currently providing investors with interactive data on a test basis as part of the SEC's voluntary filing program. The panel will be moderated by Chicago Sun-Times personal finance columnist Terry Savage. Richard Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of The Corporate Library, will provide closing remarks and discuss the significance of interactive data for corporate governance. 

The roundtable will take place at the Commission's headquarters at 100 F Street, NE., Auditorium, Room L-002, Washington, DC at 10 a.m. The public is invited to observe the roundtable discussions. Seating is available on a first-come, first-serve basis. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brigitte Lippmann at (202) 551-3713. 

Dated: March 13, 2007. 

By the Commission. 

Nancy M. Morris, 

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-4892 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
(Reap. Dec. 10141)

#### Ikora Importers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 727588, etc.

(Decided January 18, 1962)

*Barnes, Richardson & Coliurn*for the plaintiffs.

*WilUam S. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Eao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That this stipulation is limited to the items marked “A” and initialed MG by Examiner M. Greenberg on the invoices covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated on Schedule “A”, hereto attached and made a part hereof.

> 2. That on or about the date of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the ordinary course of trade in the principal markets of the country of exportation, either for home consumption or for exportation to the United States.

> 3. That on or about the said date of exportation, such or similar imported merchandise was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the ordinary course of trade for domestic consumption in the principal markets of the United States.

> 4. That the cost of production of the merchandise described hereinabove, as defined in Sec. 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is equal to the unit values noted in red ink by the Appraiser less 40% less 3% less 4%, net packed.

> *5155. That these appeals may be submitted on this stipulation, and are abandoned in all respects as to all matters not described hereinabove.

Upon the agreed facts, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the value of the merchandise marked “A” and initialed MG, by Examiner M. Greenberg, on the invoices covered by said appeals, and that such value was equal to the unit values, noted on the invoices in red ink by the appraiser, less 40 per centum, less 3 per centum, less 4 per centum, net, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Ex. 10.4 Assignment of PSA (Preston)


EXHIBIT 10.4




ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT




For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, STEADFAST ASSET HOLDINGS, INC., a California corporation (“Assignor”), hereby assigns to STAR PRESTON HILLS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), all of Assignor’s rights and obligations under and in regard to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 21, 2015, (as may have been amended or may hereafter be amended, the “Purchase Agreement”), by and between Preston Hills Gardens Associates, LLC and Riverside Realty Preston Hills, LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company (collectively, “Sellers”) and Assignor for the purchase and sale of that certain real property located in Buford, Georgia, as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”).


Assignee hereby agrees to and shall assume, perform and be fully responsible for the performance of all of the obligations of Assignor under the Purchase Agreement.


All of the provisions, covenants and agreements contained in the Assignment shall extend to and be binding upon the respective legal representatives, successors and assigns of Assignor and Assignee.  This Assignment represents the entire agreement between Assignor and Assignee with respect to the subject matter of the Assignment, and all prior or contemporaneous agreements regarding such matters are hereby rendered null and void and of no force and effect. 


(SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE)












WITNESS THE EXECUTION HEREOF, as of this March 10, 2015.


	
	
	ASSIGNOR:

	 

	STEADFAST ASSET HOLDINGS, INC.,

	a California corporation



                	
		
	By:
	/s/ Ana Marie del Rio

	 
	Ana Marie del Rio, Vice President




                    


	
	
	ASSIGNEE:

	 

	STAR PRESTON HILLS, LLC,

	a Delaware limited liability company



        
	
		
	By:
	Steadfast Apartment Advisor, LLC, a

	 
	Delaware limited liability company, its Manager




        	
		
	By:
	/s/ Kevin J. Keating

	 
	Kevin J.  Keating, Treasurer






                            
                            

















2






Exhibit A


DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND




3
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of IPEX, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Russell
Ingledew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

June 9, 2006                                 /s/ Russell Ingledew
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Russell Ingledew
                                            Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ANDREW DARVIN HERSH,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ADAMS

COUNTY AND MARK GARMAN,

SUPERINTENDENT SCI

- ROCKVIEW,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 130 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of October , 2020, the “Petition for Extraordinary Relief at

King’s Bench” is DENIED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTORIA HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-1747-GEB-PAN (JFM)

 vs. 

STEVE MARTINEZ,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment was submitted on the record

without hearing. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local

Rule 72-302(b)(17) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

On July 19, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Neither party has filed

objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01747-GEB-EFB Document 36 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 19, 2006, are adopted ; 

2. Plaintiff's February 14, 2005 motion for entry of default judgment is

GRANTED. The proposed judgment filed by plaintiff on February 14, 2005 (docket no. 17),

modified to comport with the findings and recommendations, will issue separately.

Dated: October 3, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

 

Case 2:04-cv-01747-GEB-EFB Document 36 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2
LVM and SVM Maximum Feed

David A Klarich David A Klarich to: David Ogulei 03/21/2012 08:59 AM

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded .

1 attachment

Max Metals Feed Jan 2008_May 2008.xlsx

David,

As we discussed, I have attached the file for the maximum 12 HRA values for LVM and SVM for January, 

2008 through May, 2008.

Dave 

Dave Klarich

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C.

#7 Mobile Avenue

Sauget, IL 62201

618-271-2804, X120 office

618-271-9704 fax

david.klarich@veoliaes.com

http://www.veoliaes.com/

Service first. Safety always. 

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions is for the sole use of the intended 

recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, 

disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communicate 

with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and delete same from 

all computers.

From: David A Klarich 

Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 5:00 PM

To: ogulei.david@epa.gov

Subject: Highest 12-Hour Rolling Averages (7/1/04 - 1/1/08)

David,

During our March 8 conference call, you were curious why some of the maximum 12-hour rolling 

average (HRA) metals feed values in Veolia’s February 25, 2010 Significant Modification were different 

from those that the USEPA had documented. Specifically, the values for Unit 2 SVM, Unit 3 SVM, and 

Unit 4 LVM were different. In Table 1 from the agenda for the March 8 call, you have maximum rates 

listed for the time period 7/1/04 to 1/1/08 in column 4. After reviewing documents from that time 

period, I discovered a summary spreadsheet that showed maximum 12 HRA feedrates through 5/31/08. 

In this document, the maximum rate for Unit 2 SVM is 91 lbs/hr, for Unit 3 SVM is 82 lbs/hr, and for 

Unit 4 LVM is 77 lbs/hr. These rates were the result of operations during the first five months of 2008. 
These are the maximum 12 HRA values that are in the resubmittal of the Significant Modification on

February 25, 2010. Veolia had apparently included these updated values in this document.

Should you have any further questions , please contact me.

Dave. 

Dave Klarich

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C.

#7 Mobile Avenue

Sauget, IL 62201

618-271-2804, X120 office

618-271-9704 fax

david.klarich@veoliaes.com

http://www.veoliaes.com/

Service first. Safety always. 

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions is for the sole use of the intended 

recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, 

disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communicate 

with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and delete same from 

all computers.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5138]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


CommunityExpress Pilot Program

AGENCY: Small Business Administration (SBA).

ACTION: Notice of Pilot Program extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces SBA's extension of the CommunityExpress 
Pilot Program until December 31, 2007. This extension will allow time 
for the Agency to complete its analysis of this program and also 
complete internal discussions regarding potential modifications and 
enhancements.

DATES: The CommunityExpress Pilot Program is extended under this notice 
until December 31, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Thomas, Office of Financial 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20416; Telephone (202) 205-6490; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f1929990839d9482df85999e9c9082b1829390df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f7c777e6d737a6c316b7770727e6c5f6c7d7e31787069">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CommunityExpress Pilot Program was 
established in 1999 as a subprogram of the Agency's SBAExpress Program. 
Lenders approved for participation in CommunityExpress are authorized 
to use the expedited loan processing procedures in place for the 
SBAExpress Program, but the loans approved under this Program must be 
to distressed or underserved markets. To encourage lenders to make 
these loans, SBA provides its standard 75-85 percent guaranty, which 
contrasts to the 50 percent guaranty the Agency provides under 
SBAExpress. However, under CommunityExpress participating lenders must 
arrange, and when necessary, pay for appropriate technical assistance 
for any borrowers under the program. Maximum loan amounts under this 
Program are limited to $250,000. SBA previously extended 
CommunityExpress until March 31, 2007 (71 FR 74982), to consider 
possible changes and enhancements to the Program.
    The further extension of this program until December 31, 2007, will 
allow the SBA to complete its analysis and internal discussions of 
possible changes and enhancements to the program. It will also allow 
SBA to further consult with its lending partners, the small business 
community and its oversight authorities about the Program.

(Authority: 13 CFR 120.3)

Janet A. Tasker,
Acting Director Office of Financial Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-5138 Filed 3-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended  February 29, 2004 (the "Report") by
Advanced Media, Inc. ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.




April 21, 2004                         By:  /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                            --------------------------
                                            Buddy Young
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                            Financial Officer
#### Northern Investment Corporation v. Cora Alice Cannon, a widow, Alice Tonnelier, as Administratrix of the Estate of Peter Tonnelier, deceased, and City of Fort Myers.

*173 So.*273

Division A.

Opinion Filed June 3, 1937.

*William P. Simmons,' Jr.,*and *Clyde H. Wilson,*for Appellant ;

*Sheppard & Clements*and *Allen Clements,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of Northern Investment Corporation, a Florida Corporation, v. Mutual Realty Company, a Florida Corporation, *et al.,*opinion and judgment in which was this day filed.

On authority of the opihion and judgment in that case, the order appealed from in this case is reversed with directions that the cause be remanded and further proceedings be had in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in the companion case.

It is so ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., .concur.

Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
#### Robert Blackwood v. Peter P. Van Vleet.

A decretal order allowing a general demurrer to a bill in chancery, but not in terms dismissing the bill or awarding costs, is not a *final decree*from which an appeal can be taken to this Court.

*Heard and decided July*18th.

Appeal in Chancery from Lenawee Circuit.

The bill was filed to cancel certain tax titles, held by *399defendant, of lands which he occupied, but which were claimed by complainant; and also for an injunction to restrain waste upon the lands. Defendant demurred generally, for want of equity. On the hearing in the Court below, the following decretal order was entered:

“The demurrer in this cause having been duly brought on for argument, at the last term of this Court,' and the respective solicitors having been heard, after due consideration thereupon, it is now ordered and decreed, and this Court doth order and decree, that the demurrer be and the same is hereby sustained.”

Treating this as a final decree, the complainant appealed.

*A. L. Millerd,*for complainant,

to the point that on the allowance of a general demurrer the cause was out of court, and no further steps could be taken therein, cited *Story Eq. Pl.*§459; 1 *Barb. Ch. Pr.*211; *Dan. Ch. Pr,*668, *et seq.*

*T. M.*Cooley, contra,

cited *Note to Story Eq. Pl.*§459, *last ed.; Dan. Ch. Pr.*670; 13 *Ill.*31; *Chancery Rule*22.

The Court

held this not to be a final decree. It does not necessarily dispose of the case in the Court below. It does not in terms dismiss the bill, or determine, if it is dismissed, whether it shall be without prejudice or not. It says nothing on the subject of costs. These subjects would still be under the control of the Court of Chancery, notwithstanding this order. If the complainant in this case had waited until the forty days allowed by statute for an appeal had expired, expecting defendant to apply for a decree formally dismissing the bill and awarding costs, it .could hardly be held that he had thereby lost his right to appeal. If the defendant fails to perfect the decree, and the complainant does not ask leave to amend, but desires to appeal, he can himself cause the decree to be perfected for that purpose.

*Case*dismissed, *for want of jurisdiction.*
No. 51760.

#### Protests 868920-G, etc., of Japan Paper Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

COURTNEY J. LINN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

501 I Street, Ste. 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916)554-2700

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 2:04-CV-2070-GEB-DAD

)

Plaintiff, ) NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND 

) PROPOSED ORDER RE: FILING OF

v. ) DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS

)

APPROXIMATELY $57,128.87 IN )

U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM )

WELLS FARGO BANK ACCT. NO. )

100-3307319, )

)

 Defendant. )

______________________________)

)

BUNNA IM, )

SOREN IM, )

)

Claimants. )

 )

Plaintiff, United States of America and potential claimants

Bunna Im and Soren Im, by and through their respective counsel,

have reached a tentative settlement of this matter. The parties

must still reduce their settlement to writing by Stipulation for

Final Judgment of Forfeiture. Accordingly, the parties ask that

the Court enter the following orders:

1. Pursuant to Local Rule 16-160, and for good cause shown,

the parties shall submit dispositional documents within 21 days

Case 2:04-cv-02070-GEB-DAD Document 16 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

of the date of this order.

2. All current scheduling dates and pleading deadlines,

including the dates for filing a claim and answer, are hereby

vacated. 

DATED: 11/7/05 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

 /s/ Courtney J. Linn 

COURTNEY J. LINN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 7, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02070-GEB-DAD Document 16 Filed 11/08/05 Page 2 of 2
December 13, 1961

Reap. Dec. 10127.

#### Borneo-Sumatra Trading Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Motion by plaintiff.
No. 46758.

#### Protests 31307-K, etc., of Ciba Co., Inc. (New York).

*428Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel it was held that the merchandise herein is subject to a tax of 4Koo of 3 cents per pound on the entire weight in accordance with section 701. The protests were sustained accordingly.