alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit12.1

CERTIFICATIONS

Certification of theChief Executive Officer

I, Dinesh Dhamija, certifythat:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form20-F of ebookers plc:

2.    Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

4.    The company's other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the company and have:

a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany's disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)    disclosed in thisreport any change in the company's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by thereport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company's internal report over financialreporting.

5.    The company's other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company'sauditors and the audit committee of the company's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the company'sinternal controls over financial reporting.

Date:March 25, 2004

|  | /s/ DINESHDHAMIJA |
|--|-------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|  | DINESHDHAMIJA Chief Executive Officer |
|--|---------------------------------------|

----
#### Ronald F. Malvaso et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Susan M. Frederick, Defendant, John T. Nothnagle, Inc., Appellant, and Richard Miller, Respondent.

[635 NYS2d 572]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant Miller to vacate his default. Miller established a meritorious defense and an excuse for his delay and default *(see, Pollack v Eskander,*191 AD2d 1022, *appeal dismissed*81 NY2d 1067). In light of that vacatur, the court also properly vacated its prior order granting plaintiffs partial summary judgment against defendant Nothnagle, whose liability is premised solely upon the acts of Miller. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J.—Vacate Default.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Green, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4870 

To require reports on artificial intelligence regulation in the financial services 

industry. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2024 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. HEINRICH, and Mr. YOUNG) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To require reports on artificial intelligence regulation in the 

financial services industry. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REGU4 LATION IN FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, each of the Board of Gov7 ernors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit 

8 Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of 

9 the Currency, the National Credit Union Administration, 

10 and the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection shall 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4870 IS

1 submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

2 Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Finan3 cial Services of the House of Representatives a report on 

4 the gap in knowledge of the agency relating to artificial 

5 intelligence, including an analysis on— 

6 (1) which tasks are most frequently being as7 sisted or completed with artificial intelligence in the 

8 institutions the agency regulates; 

9 (2) current governance standards in place for 

10 artificial intelligence use at the agency and current 

11 standards in place for artificial intelligence oversight 

12 by the agency; 

13 (3) potentially additional regulatory authorities 

14 required by the agency to continue to successfully 

15 execute the mission of the agency; 

16 (4) where artificial intelligence may lead to 

17 overlapping regulatory issues between agencies that 

18 require clarification; 

19 (5) how the agency is currently using artificial 

20 intelligence, how the agency plans to use such artifi21 cial intelligence the next 3 years, and the expected 

22 impact, including fiscal and staffing, of those plans; 

23 and 

24 (6) what resources, monetary or other re25 sources, if any, the agency requires to both adapt to 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4870 IS

1 the changes that artificial intelligence will bring to 

2 the regulatory landscape and to adequately adopt 

3 and oversee the use of artificial intelligence across 

4 the operations described in paragraph (5). 

5 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec6 tion may be construed to require an agency to include con7 fidential supervisory information or predecisional or delib8 erative nonpublic information in a report under this sec9 tion. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER M. REDMOND,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 720 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
No. 62618.

#### G. H. Mumm Champagne (SVCS) & Assoc., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 198080-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5030]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Executive Panel

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The CNO Executive Panel will report on the findings and 
recommendations of the Deterrence and Escalation Subcommittee to the 
Chief of Naval Operations. The meeting will consist of discussions of 
current and future Navy strategy, plans, and policies in support of 
U.S. deterrence planning, crisis management, and conflict escalation 
and control.

DATES: The meeting will be held on April 10, 2007, from 10 a.m. to 12 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Boardroom in the CNA 
Corporation Building, 4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Kip Blecher, CNO Executive Panel, 
4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311, 703-681-4909.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), these matters constitute 
classified information that is specifically authorized by Executive 
Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense and are, in 
fact, properly classified pursuant to such Executive Order. 
Accordingly, the Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing that 
the public interest requires that all sessions of this meeting be 
closed to the public because they will be concerned with matters listed 
in section 552b(c)(1) of title 5, United States Code.

    Dated: March 12, 2007.
M.A. Harvison,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-5030 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of East Coast Diversified Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Frank Rovito, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Frank Rovito

Frank RovitoChief Financial OfficerDated: September 19, 2007

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to East Coast Diversified Corporationand will be retained by East Coast Diversified Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SCWC-15-0000342

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

RUDOLPH G. KING, JR.,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-15-0000342; CR. NO. 14-1-1986)

ORDER OF CORRECTION

(By: Pollack, J.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court, 

filed December 13, 2016, is corrected as follows: 

1. Footnote 5 is renumbered to 4.

2. Footnote 6 is renumbered to 5.

3. Footnote 7 is renumbered to 6. 

4. Footnote 8 is renumbered to 7. 

5. Footnote 9 is renumbered to 8. 

6. Footnote 10 is renumbered to 9. 

7. Footnote 11 is renumbered to 10. 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000342

22-DEC-2016

04:06 PM
2

8. Footnote 12 is renumbered to 11. 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all 

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these 

changes. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 22, 2016.

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

Associate Justice
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4989 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the use of certain electric 

vehicle charging stations at rest areas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the use 

of certain electric vehicle charging stations at rest areas, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recharge your Electric 

5 Car on the Highway to Alleviate Range Gaps Effectively 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘RECHARGE Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4989 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS AT REST 

2 AREAS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 111(b)(2) of title 23, 

4 United States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

6 the end; 

7 (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period 

8 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(F) electric vehicle charging stations for 

11 light-duty vehicles (as defined in section 803 of 

12 the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 

13 16152)).’’. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

15 (1) CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY

16 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.—Section 149(c)(2) of title 

17 23, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘ex18 cept that such stations may not be established or 

19 supported where commercial establishments serving 

20 motor vehicle users are prohibited by section 111 of 

21 title 23, United States Code’’. 

22 (2) JASON’S LAW.—Section 1401(d) of the 

23 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act 

24 (23 U.S.C. 137 note; Public Law 112–141) is 

25 amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4989 IS

1 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Except 

2 as provided in paragraph (2), a State’’ and in3 serting ‘‘A State’’; 

4 (B) by striking paragraph (2); and 

5 (C) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 

6 paragraph (2). 

7 (c) CONGRESSIONAL INTENT.—Nothing in this Act 

8 or an amendment made by this Act is intended as a state9 ment of congressional intent with respect to the existing 

10 authority of the President or any other Federal agency 

11 under section 111 of title 23, United States Code. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

SCOTT N. JOHNSON,

NO. CIV. S-04-2571 WBS PAN

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

MARK D. EARL, individually and

d/b/a THE BOARDWALK; JANICE

GARNETT; and DOES 1 through

10, inclusive,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

By this court’s order of March 16, 2005, this matter

was scheduled for a further status conference on July 5, 2005,

and the parties were ordered to submit a joint status report by

no later than May 31, 2005. Plaintiff submitted a status report,

but defendant neither joined in that report nor submitted a

separate report. At the status conference on July 5, 2005,

plaintiff appeared pro se, but defendant’s counsel, Joseph

Clayton Fraulob of Farrell, Fraulob, & Brown did not appear and

did not notify the court of any reason for his failure to appear. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mr. Fraulob appear in

Case 2:04-cv-02571-WBS-PAN Document 20 Filed 07/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Courtroom 5 of this court on July 11, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. to show

cause why sanctions should not be imposed pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 16(f)for his failure to file a status

report or attend the status conference on July 5, 2005 as ordered

and for his failure to respond to telephone inquiries of the

court.

DATED: July 5, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-02571-WBS-PAN Document 20 Filed 07/06/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 61906.

#### Embrusa, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 304935-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked *“A”*consist of straw hoods, not blocked or trimmed, bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, the claim at 12)4 percent ad valorem and 25 cents per dozen under paragraph 1504 (b) (2), as modified, *supra,*was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of straw hoods, not bleached, dyed, colored, *545or stained, were held dutiable at 12}4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (1), as modified, *supra.*
Exhibit 12.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer/Managing Director of Kappa Holding B.V.,
pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

I,
H. Wagter, certify that:

|Date: June 27, 2005 |  |        |  |                                          
|------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------
|                    |  | By:    |  | /s/H. WAGTER                             
|                    |  | Name:  |  | H. Wagter                                
|                    |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer/Managing Director

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.9







Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers







The following are the annual base salaries for the named executive officers of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., effective January 1, 2015:







	
Randy K. Ferrell

	 	
$

	
299,000

	 
	
Eric P. Graap

	 	
$

	
198,000
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


March 17, 2015


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, New York Municipal Portfolio
of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 9 


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, New York Municipal Portfolio of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 9 set forth above (the
“Trust”). We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on March 16, 2015, in accordance with the valuation method
set forth in the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-201718) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO________________


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
No. 61412.

protests 273734-K, etc. (New York).

#### Alltransport, Incorporated, et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of gelatin sponges similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Alltransport, Inc.*(44 C. C. P. A. 149, C. A. D. 653), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. OSCAR POTEET, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Arthur G. D’Alessandro*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Joseph P. Lordi*and *Mr. Matthew J. 8cola*for the respondent.

May 14, 1968.

Denied.
Exhibit
23










Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of
our report dated March 5, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements
of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and
2008, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2009, which report appears in the Registrant’s Annual Report to Shareholders for
the year ended December 31, 2009.




/s/ ParenteBeard LLCParenteBeard
      LLCWilkes-Barre,
      PennsylvaniaMarch
      5, 2010


92
(Reap. Dec. 10137)

#### B. D. Howes & Son *v.*United States

Entry No. 65536.

(Decided January 8, 1962)

*Lam'ence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*William H. Orriolo, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

When this case was called for trial, it was submitted upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> *506Me. Glad : I offer to stipulate that the merchandise involved herein consists of clocks of 15 jewel movements exported from Switzerland during May of 1960, and that these items were not on the final list promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury in response to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, which inaugurated the new value act. In other words, this falls under the new value law which went into effect in ITebruary, 1958.

> I further offer to stipulate that the export value as defined under the new law is Swiss francs 123 each plus packing of Swiss francs 8.

> Me. BeaveRman : From information obtained from Examiner Powell, of the office of the Appraiser of Merchandise, port of Los Angeles, the Government so stipulates.

On the agreed facts, I find that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the clocks involved herein and that such value is Swiss francs 123 each, plus packing of Swiss francs 8.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.