alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Witness Systems, Inc.

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-33250, No. 333-67416, No. 333-107236 and
No. 333-122411) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements (No. 333-113604 and No. 333-122410) on
Form S-3 of Witness Systems, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Witness Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on
Form 10-K of Witness Systems, Inc.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Atlanta,
Georgia
March 15, 2005

---



QuickLinks
CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with this Quarterly Report of American
Surgical Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A.
Longaker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best
of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of American Surgical Holdings,
Inc.
  Date: May
14, 2008
 By:
                /s/
      JAMES
      A. LONGAKERJames
      A. LongakerChief
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
  Officer
# C_2007191EN.01000101.xml

| 17.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 191/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 10.7.2007 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 561/06 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | Basse Normandie |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aides à la restructuration en faveur des constructions mécaniques de Normandie |
| Legal basis | Budget ministère de l'économie des finances et de l'industrie, crédits du «Programme des entreprises», action 6: accompagnement des mutations industrielles, sous action I «construction navale» |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Restructuring of firms in difficulty |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Annual budget: —; Overall budget: EUR 10,4 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration | One-time grant |
| Economic sectors | Shipbuilding |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministère de l'économie des finances et de l'industrie |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

10.7.2007

Reference number of the aid

N 561/06

Member State

France

Region

Basse Normandie

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aides à la restructuration en faveur des constructions mécaniques de Normandie

Legal basis

Budget ministère de l'économie des finances et de l'industrie, crédits du «Programme des entreprises», action 6: accompagnement des mutations industrielles, sous action I «construction navale»

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Restructuring of firms in difficulty

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: —; Overall budget: EUR 10,4 million

Intensity

—

Duration

One-time grant

Economic sectors

Shipbuilding

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministère de l'économie des finances et de l'industrie

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
EXHIBIT 31.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph Pioppi, President of Goldeneye Capital Group, Inc.certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Goldeneye Capital Group,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

 Dated: April 11, 2005

 /s/ Joseph Pioppi
 -----------------
 Joseph Pioppi
 President
 (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Emerson *v.*Billingsley, Appellant.

*317Argued October 7, 1968.

Before Belu, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.

*Bruce R. Martin,*for appellant.

*Kenneth W. Behrend,*with him *Behrend and Aron-son,*for appellees.

November 12, 1968:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

In this action in trespass, service of the summons was made by the sheriff leaving a copy thereof with the defendant’s father at their allegedly common residence. The defendant filed preliminary objections to the complaint challenging proper venue of the action, and jurisdiction over the defendant’s person. In connection with the last mentioned objection, it was asserted that the defendant did not reside at his father’s residence and that the service was therefore invalid. For reasons which need not be discussed here, the court below dismissed the objections to the complaint on February 16, 1968.

*318On March 4, 1968, the plaintiffs caused judgment to be entered against the defendant for failure to enter an appearance in the action. The defendant then filed motions to strike or open the judgment. Rules to show cause were granted, but were vacated on April 10, 1968. On May 15, 1968, the defendant filed two appeals in this Court: (1) Appeal No. 175 from the Order below dismissing the preliminary objections to the complaint; and (2) Appeal No. 174 from the judgment entered on March 4, 1968.

Appeal No. 174

This appeal must be quashed. If it be considered as an appeal properly raising a question of jurisdiction under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, § §1 and 2, 12 P.S. §§672 and 673, it was not timely filed and perfected. *Reynolds Metals Co. v. Berger,*423 Pa. 360, 223 A.2d 855 (1966). If it does not raise a question of jurisdiction, it is an interlocutory order from which an appeal does not lie. *Philadelphia v. William Penn Business Institute,*423 Pa. 490, 223 A. 2d 850 (1966).

Appeal No. 175

The merits of this appeal need not be reached. In the written brief and at oral argument before this Court, appellees’ counsel indicated his consent to having the judgment appealed from stricken. The record will be remanded for the entry of such an order.

Appeal No. 175 is quashed.

Appeal No. 174, the record is remanded to the court below for the purpose indicated.

Mr. Justice Cohen concurs in the result.

Mr. Justice Musmanno did not participate in the decision of this case.
**Exhibit          32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m of 78o (d));                  and       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 2.     | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of American                  Surgical Holdings, Inc. |

**                                 AMERICAN SURGICAL HOLDINGS, INC.**

| By:    | */s/                  Zak Elgamal*                                                                   |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | ZAK                  ELGAMAL                                                                         |
|                  | President                  and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                  Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 4.1


 


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


October 25, 2016


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 274


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on October 24, 2016, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms
and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-212822) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                           
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12787-12788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP07-23-001]


Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

March 13, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 6, 2007, Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC 
(Algonquin) submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission's 
order issued February 27, 2007, in Docket No. CP07-23-000.
    Algonquin states that copies of the filing have been served upon 
all affected customers of Algonquin and interested state commissions 
and all parties on the official service list in the above-captioned 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make Protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a 
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an

[[Page 12788]]

original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#70363522333f1e1c191e15230500001f020430161502135e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="70363522333f1e1c191e15230500001f020430161502135e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 28, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4985 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of IceWEB, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  December 29, 2010/s/ Mark B. LuckyMark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer and
principal financial and accounting officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
446 A.2d 704

#### Commonwealth v. Serbanjack, Appellant.

Submitted October 28, 1981.

Gary P. Caruso, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Albert M. Nichols, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, HESTER and WATKINS, JJ.

Order affirmed on the comprehensive opinion of Judge Loughran.
No. 49216.

#### Protest 102723-K of C. A. Auffmordt & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The protest was overruled.
EXHIBIT 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we, Angelo De Caro and Robert F. O'Connell, the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)  The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)  The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                /s/ Angelo De Caro
                                --------------------------
                                Angelo De Caro
                                Chief Executive Officer



                                /s/ Robert F. O'Connell
                                --------------------------
                                Robert F. O'Connell
                                Chief Financial Officer


March 24, 2004
No. 45016.

#### Protests 978146-G, etc., of Eurasia Import Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It appeared that in each case the entered value included the charges in question and there is no claim of clerical error or that the entry was made under duress. Under the terms of section 503, Tariff Act of 1930, it was held that the collector would be bound to assess duty on the entered value.On the record presented the protests were overruled.
#### Antanitis *v.*Hecht, Appellant.

Argued October 10, 1968.

Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.

*621
      *Francis S. Patrono,*with him *Robert D. Beck,*and *Patrono, Geisler and Edwards,*for appellant.

*¡Stephen I. Richman,*with him *Greenlee, Richma'ii, Derrico & Posa,*for appellee.

November 12, 1968:

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

This is an appeal by defendant after a jury verdict for plaintiffs in claims arising from an automobile collision. The evidence as to negligence was conflicting, the verdicts were not excessive, and there was no error of law or abuse of discretion in the lower Court’s refusal to grant a new trial or a judgment n.o.v.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Musmanno did not participate in the decision of this case.
Before the Second Division,

September 27, 1949

No. 53592.

protest 148024-K (New York).

#### Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of books of *bona fide*foreign authorship similar in all material respects (except title in some instances) to the books which were the subject of *Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 C. C. P. A. 11, C. A. D. 309), the claim at 7)4 percent under paragraph 1410, as modified by T. D. 49753, was sustained. Books of *bona fide*foreign authorship stipulated to be composed in chief value of india paper, weighing over 10 pounds and less than 20)4 pounds to the ream of 288,000 square inches, similar in all material Tespects (except title) to the books the subject of *Oxford University Press, New York, Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 63, C. D. 663) were held- dutiable at 2 cents per pound, plus 10 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 1404, as modified by T. D. 49753.
No. 51017.

#### Protest 119468-K of F. W. Woolworth Co. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the harmonicas in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47811, the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 1541 was sustained.
No. 59048.

protest 218952-K (New York).

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of camphor oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Orbis Products Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 244, C. D. 1527), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

August 19, 1944

No. 49677.

#### Protests 560472-G, etc., of Barz & Olin et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that the hats in question consist of unglazed 8-bu. hats similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) was sustained.