alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned principal executive officer
of RefcoFund Holdings, LLC, the general partner (the "General Partner") of S&P
Managed Futures Index Fund, LP (the "Fund"), and principal financial officer of
the General Partner hereby certifies that:

(1)      the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q the Fund for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Fund.


Dated: May 12, 2005            /s/ Richard C. Butt
                               ------------------------------------------------
                               Richard C. Butt
                               President
                               (principal executive officer)
                               RefcoFund Holdings, LLC
                               General Partner

                               /s/ Philip Silverman
                               ------------------------------------------------
                               Philip Silverman
                               Secretary
                               (principal financial and accounting officer)
                               RefcoFund Holdings, LLC
                               General Partner

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Fund for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                       25
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4865 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4865

     To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to expedite geothermal 
 exploration and development in previously studied or developed areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2024

    Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to expedite geothermal 
 exploration and development in previously studied or developed areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Streamlining Thermal Energy through 
Advanced Mechanisms Act'' or the ``STEAM Act''.

SEC. 2. NEPA REVIEW.

    Section 390 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15942) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``, or the Geothermal 
        Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) for the purpose of 
        exploration or development of geothermal resources'' after ``or 
        gas''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or gas'' and 
                inserting ``, gas, or geothermal''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ``or gas'' and 
                inserting ``, gas, or geothermal''.
                                 <all>
```
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184
sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

June 6, 2011

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta/Alitalia/Compass
For a Statement of Authorization

Docket DOT-OST-2001-10417

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application filed earlier today and ther e are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Jennifer Trock, Counsel for Compass Richard Mathias, Counsel for Alitalia David Endersbee, Counsel for Alitalia info@airlineinfo.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HARVEY EUGENE LARSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2521 LKK GGH P

vs.

L. HINZEHUFF, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed March 29, 2005, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02521-LKK -GGH Document 22 Filed 06/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 6/14/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

lars2521.fta

Case 2:04-cv-02521-LKK -GGH Document 22 Filed 06/14/05 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Approved Tribal-State Class III Gaming Amendment. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes an approval of the amendment to the Tribal-State Compact for regulation of Class III gaming between the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and the State of Oregon. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         March 19, 2007.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. This amendment expands the distribution of the funds in the Fund Administration to the tribes' political subdivisions and clarifies that local government bodies includes school districts and individual schools.                 

Dated: March 7, 2007. 

Michael D. Olsen, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. E7-4905 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
#### PAUL GELLENTHIN, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. J. & D., INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

See same case below: 71 *N. J. Super.*226.

*Messrs. Warren, Ohasan & Leyner*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Basile, Delchop & Wolk*for the respondent.

March 12, 1962.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 20, 2010

Mr. Russell S. Post

Beck Redden & Secrest, L.L.P.

1221 McKinney, Suite 4500

Houston, TX 77010-2010

Ms. Jacalyn D Scott

Wilshire & Scott, P.C.

1221 McKinney Street, Suite 3000

Houston, TX 77010

RE:Case Number:  08-0148

Court of Appeals Number:  14-05-00215-CV

Trial Court Number:  2002-41615

Style:REGAL FINANCE COMPANY, LTD. AND REGAL FINANCE COMPANY II, LTD.

v.

TEX STAR MOTORS, INC.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@courts.state.tx.us or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 08-0148Page 1**
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EBRAHIM KALATEHE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71752

Agency No. A078-908-098

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Ebrahim Kalatehe, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597

FILED

MAY 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-71752

F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part, dismiss in part, and grant in part

the petition for review, and we remand.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Kalatehe’s motion as

untimely because the motion was filed over four years after the agency’s final

order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and the BIA considered the record and acted

within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to

establish prima facie eligibility for deferral of removal under the Convention

Against Torture. See Mendez-Gutierrez v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1168, 1172 (9th Cir.

2006) (“vague and conclusory allegations” insufficient to establish prima facie

eligibility). We reject Kalatehe’s contentions that the BIA failed to consider or

inadequately considered evidence, and that the BIA applied the wrong legal

standard.

We lack jurisdiction to review Kalatehe’s challenge to his underlying in

absentia removal order, because this petition for review is untimely as to that

order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Membreno v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1227, 1229

(9th Cir. 2005). Contrary to Kalatehe’s assertion, the BIA did not elect to revisit

the immigration judge’s decision.

In assessing Kalatehe’s motion to reopen, however, the BIA did not address

Kalatehe’s asylum and withholding of removal claims. See Brezilien v. Holder,
3 11-71752

569 F.3d 403, 412 (9th Cir. 2009) (BIA is not free to ignore arguments raised by a

petitioner). Accordingly, we grant the petition as to Kalatehe’s asylum and

withholding of removal claims and remand for the agency to consider his motion to

reopen as to these claims. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per

curiam). 

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part;

GRANTED in part; REMANDED.
**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Anmore,
      Inc.
      for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2007, I, Giorgio Saumat, Principal Executive
      Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Anmore, Inc. hereby certify pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.
        Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ending March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
        The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ended March 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Anmore, Inc.




Dated:
                May 18, 2007




**ANMORE,
      INC.**




By:
            */s/
                Giorgio Saumat*
              Chief Executive
                Officer,
              Chief
                Financial Officer and
              Principal
                Accounting Officer
#### In the Matter of Thomas A. Bonilla, Petitioner, v Phillip Coombe, Jr., as Acting Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 668]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

After taking a urinalysis test which produced a positive result for the presence of opiates, petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged with, and subsequently found guilty of, violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from using controlled substances. Petitioner contends that the positive test result was attributable to his consumption of cheeseburgers with poppy seed buns at around the time the test was conducted. He argues that he was deprived of due process because the Hearing Officer refused his request to call as a witness a representative of the company which manufactured the testing equipment and that the administrative determination is not supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Initially, inasmuch as petitioner failed to raise this issue upon administrative appeal, petitioner has failed to preserve the issue for review. Upon review of the record, we find that the misbehavior report, the urinalysis test result and the testimony of the correction officer who conducted the test provide substantial evidence supporting respondent’s determination. We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW155744] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Missouri Basin Well Service Inc. for competitive oil and gas lease WYW155744 for land in Sheridan County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163.00 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW155744 effective December 1, 2006, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                 

Pamela J. Lewis, 

Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

 [FR Doc. E7-4689 Filed 3-14-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Transax International Limited
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stephen Walters, chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Stephen Walters
-------------------
Stephen Walters
Chief Executive Officer
April 15, 2009
No. 64191.

protests 312306-K, etc. (Laredo).

#### Rio Grande Importing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER07-360-000; EL07-39-000]


New York Independent System Operator, Inc.; Notice of Institution 
of Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

March 7, 2007.
    On March 6, 2007, the Commission issued an order that instituted a 
proceeding in Docket No. EL07-39-000, pursuant to section 206 of the 
Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2005), concerning the justness 
and reasonableness of the New York Independent System Operator, Inc.'s 
in-city ICAP market. New York Independent System Operator, Inc., 118 
FERC ] 61,182 (2007).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL07-39-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be 60 days from the date of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4476 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND GLADDEN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1866 FCD GGH P

vs.

D.L. RUNNEL, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

On September 13, 2006, petitioner filed a status report requesting until October

30, 2006, to file an opposition to respondent’s motion to amend the answer.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s opposition to

respondent’s motion to amend is due on or before October 30, 2006; respondent may file a reply

within twenty days thereafter.

DATED: 9/20/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

glad1866.ord

Case 2:04-cv-01866-FCD-GGH Document 28 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 1