alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6809

JEFFREY A. PLEASANT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PAGE TRUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-04-429-3)

Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 26, 2005

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey A. Pleasant, Appellant Pro Se. Amy L. Marshall, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey A. Pleasant seeks to appeal the magistrate

judge’s* order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition and denying his motion for discovery. The order is not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of the

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Pleasant has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Patrick F. ConroyName: Patrick F. Conroy Date: November 12, 2013
Before the Second Division,

May 20, 1953

No. 57343.

protest 181294-K (New York).

#### Metal Traders, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Laweence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of scrap lead of which metal is the component material of chief value, and which is secondhand and fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, as amended by Public Law 66, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
### SERVED: JULY 16, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF AIRLINE TRANSPORT PROFESSIONALS, INC. Respondent DocketNo. FAA-2011-0288 (Federal AviationAdministration)

IN THE MATTER OF AIRLINE TRANSPORT PROFESSIONALS, INC. Respondent DocketNo. FAA-2011-0289 (Federal Aviation Administration)



### NOTICE OF PREHEARING TELEPHONE CONFERENCE j l \ ,,-,. l ""' l
. .·-\ • .,'· i j

A Prehearing Telephone Conference for the captioned cases is scheduled onFriday, August 8, 2014, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Time. All parties should be prepared to discuss all issues and facts atissue. Pursuantto Section 556 ofthe Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. · 

### § 556(c)(8), eachparty shall be represented by someone who has authority to negotiate concerning resolution ofall issues in controversy. Any documents thathave been exchanged and thathave not already beenprovidedto the Judge should be providedbythe Claimant and received inthis office no later than 5:00p.m., Eastern Time, July 24,2014. Theparties shall
access the Conference by dialing 202-493-2343 at the appointed time.

### SERVED: JULY 16, 2014

SO ORDERED.

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVED: JULY 16, 2014

FDMS Nos. FAA-2011-0288 & FAA-2011-0289 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration
· 800 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

### ONE COPY Jeffrey R. 

### Ludwig, Esq., Respondent's Counsel 

### Ludwig & 

### Associates, P.A. 5150 Belfort Road.S., Building 500 Jacksonville, FL 32256 TEL: 904-281-0145 FAJ<: 904-451-0384 Gerald A. Ellis, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box20636 Atlanta, GA 30230 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 The HonorableRonnie A. Yoder, Chief AdministrativeLawJudge 

### U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20, Room E12-320 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2142 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. ·
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of 724 Solutions Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Glenn Barrett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1)  the Report fully complies with the   requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                            
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (2)  the information contained in the Report   fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and   results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods   indicated.

|Date: March   17, 2005 | /s/ GLENN   BARRETT                                                            
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |                                                                                
|                       | Name:  Glenn Barrett                                                           
|                       | Title:  Chief Financial Officer and   Senior Vice-President, Corporate Services
##### 



SUN LIFE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF CANADA INC.

Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Sun Life Financial
Services of Canada Inc. (the Company), dated February 12, 2003 for the year
ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC), and as amended by Form 40-F/A dated February 18,
2003 as filed with the SEC, and as further amended by
Form 40-F/A, dated May 16, 2003 and to be filed with the SEC (collectively the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his respective knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.        

Date: May 16, 2003

| |                                                                              
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Donald A.
StewartDonald A. Stewart
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 16, 2003

| |                                                                                          
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul W.
DerksenPaul W. Derksen
Executive Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Senior
Vice-President & Chief Legal Officer of Sun Life Financial Services of Canada Inc. (the
Company) and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5050 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5050

   To prohibit the importation of certain minerals from the Russian 
                              Federation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2024

  Mr. Daines introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the importation of certain minerals from the Russian 
                              Federation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN MINERALS FROM THE 
              RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

    (a) In General.--Beginning on the date that is 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, no mineral specified in subsection 
(b) that is produced in the Russian Federation or by a Russian entity 
may be imported into the United States.
    (b) Minerals Specified.--The minerals specified in this subsection 
are the following:
            (1) Braggite.
            (2) Copper.
            (3) Nickel.
            (4) Palladium.
            (5) Platinum.
            (6) Rhodium.
            (7) Ruthenium.
            (8) Zinc.
    (c) Termination.--
            (1) In general.--The prohibition under subsection (a) 
        shall, subject to paragraph (2), terminate on the date that is 
        one year after the President certifies to Congress that the 
        Government of the Russian Federation has ended all hostilities 
        against Ukraine.
            (2) Probationary period.--If, at any time during the 3-year 
        period after the President submits a certification described in 
        paragraph (1), the President certifies to Congress that the 
        Government of the Russian Federation has resumed hostilities 
        against Ukraine, the prohibition under subsection (a) shall--
                    (A) resume effect;
                    (B) remain in effect until the President submits to 
                Congress another certification described in paragraph 
                (1); and
                    (C) after the President submits such a 
                certification, be subject to resumption as described in 
                this paragraph.
    (d) No Waiver.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
President may not waive the prohibition under subsection (a).
    (e) Russian Entity Defined.--In this section, the term ``Russian 
entity'' means an entity that is organized under the laws of, or 
otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of, the Russian Federation.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Adlai Robertson, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 1008]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.), rendered February 10, 1995, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*381Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf, People v Gonzalez, 41*NY2d 606). Balletta, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Agri-Med Techynologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger L. Fidler, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Roger L. Fidler------------------------------------     Roger L. Fidler,     Chief Executive Officer 

Date:    November 21, 2005

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shawn Martin, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 147]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered November 17, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree and attempted murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review, the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress identification testimony and his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the People failed to establish probable cause for his arrest because the police relied upon hearsay information which did not satisfy the *Aguilar-Spinelli*test *(see, Spinelli v United States,*393 US 410; *Aguilar v Texas, 378 US*108). We find this contention to be without merit. "It is well settled that information provided by an identified citizen accusing another individual of a specific crime is legally sufficient to provide the police with probable cause to arrest” *(People v Burton,*194 AD2d 683, 684; *see, People v Newton,*180 AD2d 764; *People v Douglas,*138 AD2d 731, 732). When the witness supplying information to the police is an identified citizen relating information about a crime the citizen personally observed, the People need not make an independent showing of the witness’ reliability and basis of knowledge *(see, e.g.,*
      *569
      *People v Rivera,*210 AD2d 895; *People v Robbins,*198 AD2d 451).

The evidence adduced at the suppression hearing established that the detective investigating the crime spoke to three civilian witnesses. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record reveals that the witnesses’ names were known to the police. The names were merely withheld during the suppression hearing, with the defendant’s consent. From these witnesses, the detective learned that one of the perpetrators of the crime, known as Spooney, lived in a housing project on Blake Avenue and that he was 16 years old. One of the witnesses described Spooney’s height, weight, haircut, facial hair, gold teeth, and thick eyebrows, and all three witnesses indicated that they knew Spooney prior to the crime.

The detective then learned through the Housing Police Department computer records that the defendant was known as Spooney. The defendant’s address on Blake Avenue, his age, and physical description, as provided by the Housing Police, matched the information the detective had gathered on the individual named Spooney. Under the circumstances, there was probable cause to arrest the defendant *(see, People v Burton,*194 AD2d 683, *supra).*The defendant’s contention that the witnesses who provided information to the detective were not actual eyewitnesses to the crime is without merit inasmuch as the record reveals that two of these witnesses made lineup identifications of the defendant as a perpetrator of the crime.

We conclude that the defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
COA # 13-14-00002-CR

Francisco Javier Gonzalez v. The

STYLE: State of Texas

TRIAL COURT: 370th District Court

TRIAL COURT #: CR-2705-13-G

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Hon. Noe Gonzalez

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED

DATE:

JUSTICE:

PUBLISH:

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APP BR:

PC

DNP:

\HM-W

OFFENSE: Murder

COUNTY: Hidalgo

MOTIONFOR REHEARING IS:

DATE: August 28, 2014

JUDGE: LONGORIA

SUPP CLK RECORD

SUPP RPT RECORD.

SUPP BR

PROSE BR

FILE COPY

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APPfUAA/r]S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: l&llJfl

JUDGE: J2±

*0—

CCA# \HO*-/U

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

CCA IS:.

JUDGE:

ON ON

JUDGE:
December 19, 1955

No. 59616.

Suit 4838.

#### United States *v.*Accurate Millinery Co. and Roberts, Reilly & Sons et al.

C. D. 1652 affirmed June 15, 1955. O. A. D. 599.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, I, Martin S. Lapera, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.



/s/ Martin S. Lapera
-------------------------------------
Martin S. Lapera
President and Chief Executive Officer
Skip NavigationUSGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Woods Hole Science Center
GIS Compilation of Data Collected from the Pulley Ridge Deep Coral Reef Region OF 2005-1089
OF       2005-1089

Disc       Contents

Introduction

Surficial       Geology

GIS/Visualization

Data       Catalog

References       Cited

Acknowledgments

Contacts

Figure 2. Click on figure for larger       image. Shaded-relief image of the study area derived from       the multibeam bathymetry with 5 m contours. Different morphological       features discussed in the text are labeled on the figure as are the three       bathymetry profiles shown in Figure 3. 
Skip       Navigation
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and       Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL:       woodshole.er.usgs.gov/pubs/of2005-1089/htmldocs/fig2.htmPage Contact       Information: WHSC       WebmasterThis page last modified on Monday, 14-Jan-2013 12:50:16       EST
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-245-022]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

March 14, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 9, 2007, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume NO. 1, the tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing, with the proposed effective date of the 
tariff sheets are March 1, 2007 and April 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Sec.  154.210 of the 
Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest must 
serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afe9eafdece0c1c3c6c1cafcdadfdfc0dddbefc9caddcc81c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f9bfbcabbab6979590979caa8c8989968b8db99f9c8b9ad79e968f">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5016 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>