alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-Fof ebookers plc (the "Company") for theperiod ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Nigel Addison Smith, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of myknowledge:

(1)    the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

Date: March25, 2004

|  | /s/ NIGEL ADDISONSMITH |
|--|------------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|  | NIGELADDISON SMITH Chief FinancialOfficer |
|--|-------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 10.6





 





Champions Oncology, Inc.


March 16, 2015


 


 


Ronnie Morris, M.D.


 


Dear Dr. Morris:


 


This letter refers to our letter agreement dated November 5,
2013 regarding your employment compensations. The letter states that, for your employment year beginning November 2014 your annual
salary of $305,000 will be paid in the form of cash to the extent of $196,000, and the balance will be paid in stock options.


 


We have agreed that for this current employment year your entire
annual salary will be paid in options. As stated in the November 5 letter, the Company will determine in good faith the number
of shares that will be subject to the options using the Black-Scholes pricing model.


 


Please countersign this letter below to acknowledge our mutual
agreement.


 


 





	 	 	CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/ Abba David Poliakoff



	 
	 	 		Abba David Poliakoff, Chairman



	 
	 	 		of the Compensation Committee



	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Ronnie Morris	 		 
	Ronnie Morris, M.D.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60287

Summary Calendar

ABDUL KARIM

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A79 011 669

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Abdul Karim seeks review of an order by the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen the removal proceedings against

him. He argues that the BIA should have exercised its authority under 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(a) to reopen the removal proceedings against him sua sponte. The BIA

denied Karim’s motion, finding that no exceptional circumstance warranted the

exercise of its authority to sua sponte reopen Karim’s proceedings.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 31, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60287

2

This court cannot undertake review of an agency’s discretionary

determination where there is “no meaningful standard against which to judge

the agency’s exercise of discretion.” Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 830 (1985).

There are no guidelines directing the BIA’s decision whether to reopen removal

proceedings on its own motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). Therefore, this court

has no jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision to deny Karim’s motion for a sua

sponte reopening of his removal proceedings. See Ramos-Bonilla v. Mukasey,

543 F.3d 216, 220 (5th Cir. 2008); Enriquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 246,

249–50 (5th Cir. 2004). See also, e.g., Lenis v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 523 F.3d 1291,

1292-93 (11th Cir. 2008) (citing cases). We decline Karim’s invitation to revisit

this court’s holding in Enriquez-Alvarado. See Burge v. Parish of St. Tammany,

187 F.3d 452, 466 (5th Cir. 1999) (“It is a firm rule of this circuit that in the

absence of an intervening contrary or superseding decision by this court sitting

en banc or by the United States Supreme Court, a panel cannot overrule a prior

panel's decision”). Additionally, we note that the denial of Karim’s motion for

reopening under § 1003.2(a) does not amount to a deprivation of a liberty

interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the Constitution. See

Altamirano-Lopez v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 547, 550 (5th Cir. 2006) (holding that

a discretionary decision to deny a motion to reopen does not amount to a

deprivation of a liberty interest). 

Accordingly, Karim’s petition for review is DISMISSED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD GLADDING, 

NO. CIV. S-04-2605 FCD/GGH

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND

DISPOSITION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant.

____________________________________/

Pursuant to the representations of defendant’s counsel in the above action the court has

determined that this case has settled. 

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 160, dispositional documents are to be

filed on or before November 28, 2005. All dates set in this matter, including any pending

motions, are hereby VACATED.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL AS WELL AS ANY

PARTY OR PARTIES WHO CAUSE NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 7, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02605-FCD-GGH Document 17 Filed 10/07/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 47924.

#### Protest 634723-G of M. Stern (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with agreement of counsel that the hats in question are similar to those the subject of *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), the protest was sustained.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8218 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to require any individual 

who votes in a municipal election of the District of Columbia to be 

a United States citizen and to provide proof of citizenship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2024 

Mr. TIMMONS (for himself, Mr. PFLUGER, Ms. HAGEMAN, and Mr. FRY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to require any individual who votes in a municipal election 

of the District of Columbia to be a United States citizen 

and to provide proof of citizenship. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Demanding Citizenship 

5 in DC Elections Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8218 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP REQUIRED TO VOTE IN DIS2 TRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title IV of the District of Colum4 bia Home Rule Act (1–201.01 et seq., D.C. Official Code) 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘PART G—VOTING REQUIREMENTS 

7 ‘‘SEC. 497. PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP REQUIRED TO VOTE IN 

8 LOCAL ELECTIONS. 

9 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘local 

10 election’ means— 

11 ‘‘(1) an election for— 

12 ‘‘(A) Mayor; 

13 ‘‘(B) Chairman or member of the Council; 

14 ‘‘(C) Attorney General; 

15 ‘‘(D) Member of the State Board of Edu16 cation; or 

17 ‘‘(E) Advisory Neighborhood Commis18 sioner; or 

19 ‘‘(2) an initiative, referendum, recall, or charter 

20 amendment measure on a District ballot. 

21 ‘‘(b) PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP REQUIRED.—An indi22 vidual may not vote in a local election unless the indi23 vidual— 

24 ‘‘(1) is a citizen of the United States; and 

25 ‘‘(2) demonstrates proof of such citizenship to 

26 the Board of Elections.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 8218 IH

1 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

2 (1) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of con3 tents for the District of Columbia Home Rule Act is 

4 amended by inserting after the item relating to sec5 tion 496 the following: 

‘‘PART G—VOTING REQUIREMENTS

‘‘Sec. 497. Proof of citizenship required to vote in local elections.’’. 

6 (2) CONFORMING REPEAL.—The Local Resi7 dent Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022 (D.C. 

8 Law 24–242) is repealed, and each provision of law 

9 amended by that Act is amended to read as it read 

10 on the day before the effective date of that Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 6

CONSENT OF APPOINTED ACTUARY

I consent to the use and incorporation by reference of the
following report in this Annual Form 40-F of Sun Life Financial Inc.:

My report dated February 15, 2012 on the valuation of the policy
liabilities of Sun Life Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries for its consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and their change in the consolidated statements of operations for the years then ended, in accordance with accepted
actuarial practice, including selection of appropriate assumptions and methods.

Dated February 16, 2012



|                                        |  | 
|--------------------------------------- |  | 
|/S/ Lesley Thomson                    |  | 
|                                        | 
|Lesley Thomson                          |  | 
|                                        | 
|Fellow, Canadian Institute of Actuaries |  | 
|Toronto, Canada                         |  |
(V. D. 82)

#### Keuffel & Esser Co. et al. v. United States

Entry No. 978318, etc.

(Decided August 22, 1958)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawbence, Judge:

This is a valuation proceeding which arose by virtue of judgments issued by the second division of this court in the cases of *Keuffel & Esser Co.*v. *United States,*38 Cust. Ct. 531, Abstract 60829, and *Gramercy Import Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*id. 541, Abstract 60869, wherein the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement, pursuant to the provisions of title 28, U. S. C. § 2636 (d).

The parties to this proceeding have stipulated and agreed as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise consists [sic] of instruments and cases which were held by the Court in Abstracts 60829 and 60869 to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of article.

> 2. That the market value or the price of the instruments and cases herein at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition ready for shipment to the United States was as set forth below.

*459

3. That there was no higher foreign value.

Upon the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as such value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the drawing instruments and cases therefor covered by the remands of protests enumerated in the schedule, attached to and forming part of this decision, and that such value is as shown in paragraph 2 of the above-quoted stipulation.

I further find and hold such values to be the proper dutiable values of said merchandise.

As to all other merchandise, the remands are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 13-322 

________________________________________________________________________ 

REMOTE SENSING 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between the 

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 and NORWAY 

Signed at Reston and Oslo 

March 12 and 22, 2013 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 NORWAY 

Remote Sensing: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Reston and Oslo 

 March 12 and 22, 2013; 

 Entered into force March 22, 2013. 

 With annexes.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

October 13, 2004 

 

The Board of Directors 

and Stockholders 

Molecular Imaging Corporation 

9530 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 120 

San Diego, California 92121 

 

As the independent public accountants for Molecular Imaging Corporation we hereby consent to the incorporation in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB ofMolecular Imaging Corporation, of our report dated October 13, 2004, regarding the June 30, 2004 and 2003, consolidated financial statements. We also consent to all other references to our company included in this annual report. 

 

/s/ PETERSON & CO., LLP 

 

Peterson & Co., LLP 

3655 Nobel Drive, Suite 500 

San Diego, California 92122-1089
CIV. S-04-2587 WBS KMJ 1

THOMAS N. STEWART, III - #88128

ATTORNEY AT LAW

369 BLUE OAK LANE, 2nd FLOOR

CLAYTON, CA 94517

TELEPHONE (925) 672-8452

TELEFAX (925) 673-1729

Attorneys for William Tranquilli

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM TRANQUILLI, Case No. CIV. S-04-2597 WBS KMJ

Plaintiff, STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER

v.

VIRGINIA J. YEE REVOCABLE

TRUST,

Defendants.

__________________________________/ 

The parties hereto stipulate as follows:

The parties have reached a full and final settlement of all issues in this action. A

Settlement Agreement between the parties has been fully executed. 

Some parts of the Settlement Agreement are to be performed in the future. The parties

shall comply with their Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is incorporated by reference as

if fully set forth. The parties request the Court to retain jurisdiction for eighteen months from

the date hereof in order to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement under the authority of

Case 2:04-cv-02597-WBS -KJM Document 10 Filed 10/04/05 Page 1 of 2
CIV. S-04-2587 WBS KMJ 2

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. Of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).

Although the parties are hereby dismissing this action with prejudice, they agree that the

Court will retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties hereto in order to be able to

enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their

designated counsel that this action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP

41(a)(2), and the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement for

eighteen months after the date hereof.

Date: September 27, 2005 Date: September 27, 2005

_S/Shawna M. Kaskack_______ __S/Thomas N. Stewart, III______

Shawna M. Kashack, Thomas N. Stewart, III, 

Attorney for Defendants Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Date: October 3, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-02597-WBS -KJM Document 10 Filed 10/04/05 Page 2 of 2
hgbl-ex102_16.htm



 

Exhibit 10.2



August 17, 2016

DEAL FINANCING MEMORANDUM

 


	
Deal name:
	
 
	
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC

	
Location:
	
 
	
Kansas City, Missouri

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Description:
	
 
	
Purchase for resale of entire personal property contents of a 690,000 SF pharmaceutical manufacturing facility, including but not necessarily limited to multiple production lines and specialized equipment, laboratory equipment, processing machinery and equipment and facility support equipment on a wall-to-wall, ceiling-to-floor basis (collectively, the "Assets"). Assets to be resold commencing late September, 2016.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Price:
	
 
	
$3,885,000 for all assets. Heritage Global Partners, Inc. ("HGP"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Heritage Global Inc., will purchase a 25% undivided interest in the Assets for $971,250.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Source of

Funds:
	
 
	
The Dove Holdings Corporation  $250,000

	
 
	
 
	
Ross Dove (individually)              $300,000

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Balance of funds to be provided by HGP internally.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Funding Date:
	
 
	
8/19/16

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Interest:
	
 
	
10% per annum on outstanding balance.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Term:
	
 
	
Payable in full with all accrued interest within 180 days.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Security:
	
 
	
First priority security interest in HGP's 25% undivided interest in the Assets. Funds to be repaid to The Dove Holdings Corporation and Ross Dove pari passu with interest from the distribution(s) of HGP's portion of proceeds resulting from the resale of the Assets prior to any proceeds being retained by HGP.




 


	
Investment Committee

	
Approval:
	
 
	
August 17, 2016.

	
 

	
APPROVED

	
 

	
/s/ Allan Silber

	
Allan Silber

	
Chairman, Heritage Global Inc.

	
 

	
Date:   August 17, 2016
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5070 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove certain age 

restrictions on Medicaid eligibility for working adults with disabilities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove 

certain age restrictions on Medicaid eligibility for working adults with disabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Access to 

5 Medicaid Buy-in Programs Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5070 IS

1 SEC. 2. REMOVING CERTAIN AGE RESTRICTIONS ON MED2 ICAID ELIGIBILITY FOR WORKING ADULTS 

3 WITH DISABILITIES. 

4 (a) Section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XV) of the Social Se5 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XV)) is amend6 ed by striking ‘‘, but less than 65,’’. 

7 (b) Section 1905(v)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 1396d(v)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘, but 

9 less than 65,’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 47413.

#### Protests 979922-G, etc., of Southern States Cooperative Seed *&*Farm Supply Service et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting. 

*Time and Date:*                         8 a.m.-5 p.m., April 24, 2007 (Closed).                     

*Place:*                         Renaissance Hotel, 590 W. Peachtree Street NW., Atlanta, GA 30308, telephone 404-881-6000.                     

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                     

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of the NCCDPHP Arthritis Program.                     

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Lee Ann B. Ramsey, Designated Federal Official, Division of Adult and Community Health, CDC, 4770 Buford Hwy. NE., Mailstop K51, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone 770-488-6036.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: March 2, 2007. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. E7-4537 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RODNEY BRIDENTHAL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-670

[July 5, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Okeechobee County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

472012CF000424A.

Rodney Bridenthal, Blountstown, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. 

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 50114.

Suit 4461.

#### *United States*v. *John Barr.*

C. A. D. 279 reversed by Supreme Court February 5, 1945, thereby -affirming C. D. 801.