alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Total  Entertainment,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Richard B. Davis., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


                                              /s/ RICHARD B. DAVIS
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Richard B. Davis

April 20, 2005
No. 57336.

protest 194800-K (New York).

#### Package Products Co. and Van Oppen & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellophane sheets similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Coughlin Mfg. Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 40, C. D. 1345) and *Gillette Safety Razor Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 44, C. D. 1346), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANE ILED 

PR 22-0004 FEB 0 8 2022 

Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprerne Court State of INAnntana 

IN RE PETITION OF DANIELLE S. VUKONICH 

FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS 

IN THE BAR OF MONTANA 

ORDER 

Danielle S. Vukonich has petitioned this Court for reinstatement to active status in 

the State Bar of Montana. The petition indicates that Vukonich voluntarily chose inactive 

status on July 8, 2015. It is the Court's practice in such cases, given the amount of time 

since Vukonich has been on active status, to require a character and fitness review and the 

completion of continuing education. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner shall submit to an investigation 

conducted by the Commission on Character and Fitness, which, in its discretion, may be a 

limited investigation. Petitioner shall comply with the character and fitness process and 

timely produce information and documentation as requested by the Commission. The 

Commission will investigate Petitioner's character and fitness in accordance with the Rules 

of Procedure of the Commission on Character and Fitness. The Commission will advise 

the Court whether the Petitioner has been certified, conditionally certified, or denied 

certification. If the Commission denies certification, the Commission will issue written 

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a decision pursuant to Section 5(c)(6) of the 

Rules of Procedure of the Commission on Character and Fitness. If the Petitioner is 

certified or conditionally certified by the Commission on Character and Fitness, the 

Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice of law in Montana upon payment of 

appropriate dues and fees and penalties to the State Bar of Montana. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if admitted, within six months of admission to 

the active practice of law, Petitioner shall submit to the Board of Continuing Legal 

Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena, MT 59624, proof of attendance at thirty hours of 

approved Continuing Legal Education to be credited to the time Petitioner was on inactive 

02/08/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0004
status. This may include approved credits previously obtained by Petitioner during the last 

two years, if any. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this day of February, 2022. 

2 

Chief Justice 

6/13:> 

ftlJus iL
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul Bell, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 217]

—Appeal by the defen*349dant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered August 9, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends, among other things, that he is entitled to reversal of his conviction because the prosecutor, while cross-examining the defendant, asked the defendant if he had discussed the defense of justification with his counsel. This issue is unpreserved for appellate review because no objection was made to this question *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, although such a question would generally be improper *(see, People v Glenn,*52 NY2d 880, 881), here, the defense counsel, on direct examination of the defendant, had asked the defendant if he had had an opportunity to discuss his defense with counsel. Thus, the prosecutor’s question "concernfed] matters originally brought out * * * on direct examination of the witness” *(People v Zaborski,*88 AD2d 1074, 1075, *mod on other grounds*59 NY2d 863).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
#### Despina Hotzoglou, Respondent, v Nick Hotzoglou et al., Appellants.

[634 NYS2d 501]

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated July 6, 1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff slipped and fell, sustaining physical injuries, while descending an exterior staircase at the defendants’ home. Contrary to the defendants’ contention, issues of fact exist which preclude an award of summary judgment. There is evidence in the record that the defendants were aware that the staircase was in a dilapidated condition and that it became slippery in the rain. Moreover, the defendants acknowledged that the exterior staircase did not have a handrail, and they did not establish, as a matter of law, that their home is exempt from the applicable building ordinances that require one *(see, Orlick v Granit Hotel & Country Club,*30 NY2d 246; *Major v Waverly & Ogden,*7 NY2d 332; *Edlitz v Village of Dobbs Ferry,*97 AD2d 747; *Lattimore v Falcone,*35 AD2d 1069). Indeed, "[e]ven if the fall was precipitated by a misstep, 'if a hand-rail had been furnished, the [plaintiff! might have held on to it as [s]he descended the stairs, and could have avoided falling. Therefore, the absence of the rail, if required by law, would seem to be a proximate cause of the accident’ ” *(Lattimore v Falcone, supra,*at 1069). Since summary judgment should not be awarded when, as here, there are genuine issues of material fact *(see, Museums at Stony Brook v Village of Patchogue Fire Dept,*146 AD2d 572), the Supreme Court correctly denied the defendants’ motion. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Florio, JJ., concur.
Case 2:04-cv-02017-GEB-GGH   Document 34    Filed 09/23/05   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-02017-GEB-GGH   Document 34    Filed 09/23/05   Page 2 of 2

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-27T00:16:26-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Before the Second Division,

March 3, 1950

No. 54101.

#### D. P. Harris Hardware & Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States,

protests 793673-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Spiegel Bros. Corp.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 194, C. D. 692) and Abstract 49673, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 52049.

#### British American Importation Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 116402-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the value of the contents of each of the barrels, casks, packages, etc., was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gauger’s return as verified by the affidavit of the importer. The protest was sustained to this extent.
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Joshua D. HADLEY

Machinery Technicians Third Class (E-4), U.S. Coast Guard

CGCMG 0394

Docket No. 1492

20 March 2024

General court-martial sentence adjudged on 16 February 2023.

Military Judge: CDR Emily P. Reuter, USCG

Appellate Defense Counsel: LT Schuyler B. Millham, USCG

BEFORE

MCCLELLAND, BRUBAKER & HERMAN

Appellate Military Judges

Per curiam:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted Appellant, consistent with 

his pleas entered in accordance with a plea agreement, of one specification of abusive sexual 

contact, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Appellant was 

sentenced to confinement for four months, reduction to E-1, and bad-conduct discharge. 

Judgment was entered accordingly. 

Before this Court, without admitting that the findings and sentence are correct in law and 

fact, Appellant has submitted this case on its merits as to any and all errors.
(\ 

United States v. Joshua D. HADLEY, No. 1492 (C.G. Ct. Crim. App. 2024) 

Decision 

We determine that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and, on the basis 

of the entire record, should be approved. Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence, as 

approved below, are affirmed. 

2 

For the Court, 

//7 , r , 

(, ·-~CUcJ/\ \~ (__;~ 

\ 

Saiiah P. Valdes 

I 

. el erk of the Court
Bromide Quat Production

We need a bromide quat. Below is the schematic method for producing this quat. This material 

has been produced in a research setting up to the one Kg level. The reaction is a 1:1 mole ratio 

of an epoxy with an amine and was run at dry ice temperature in order to keep the reactants

from volatilizing, but a temp of -20 will likely work as well.

Lab Procedure Bromide Quat

A pre-weighed 150 ml cylindrical bottom pressure vessel, capped with a septum, was cooled to 

-78 °C in a dry ice/acetone bath under argon. Amine was added (ca. 0.6 mole) was passed 

through the septum with a needle and condensed as a liquid. After quickly determining the 

mass of the second reactant, 0.531 moles was weighed into a cylindrical bottom pressure 

vessel along with an anhydrous solvent with a magnetic stir-bar. After capping the vessel with a 

septum, the second reactant solution was cooled to -78°C, in a dry ice/acetone bath, under 

argon. The amine (first reactant) vessel was connected via cannula. 

The argon inlet was removed from the amine vessel and the liquid was slowly warmed to 

ambient temperature with external heat, the amine liquid transferred rapidly. The septum on the 

2L vessel was replaced with a teflon screw-cap and the homogeneous, colorless solution was 

warmed to 0 °C in an ice bath. After 15 min., a white solid began to form. The reaction was 

stirred for ~ 5 hr at 0 °C and warmed to ambient temperature overnight. 

The white hygroscopic solid was filtered on a buchner funnel and rinsed with diethyl ether (4 

volumes, 180 mL each). The top of the buchner funnel was covered with latex rubber sheeting 

(VWR 56376) to reduce exposure to atmospheric moisture and press out solvent. After drying 

under suction for 15 min., the white solid was dried at 48 °C overnight under high vacuum, to 

remove any trace solvent. Removal of trace solvent and unused reactants is important in 

preventing problems in downstream reactions. The white solid weighed had 89.1% yield. The 

compound is very hygroscopic and will take up atmospheric moisture on the bench-top. The 

reaction has been run at one-third scale with reproducible results. Lowered yields will result if 

amine gas is lost due to tubing/septum leaks.
No. 64919.

#### A. V. Olsson Trading Co. and A. H. Marzolf *v.*United States,

protests 60/2362, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

724 SOLUTIONS INC.

Section 1350 Certification

In
connection with the periodic report of 724 Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John J. Sims, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

|Date: March 16, 2004 | /s/JOHN J. SIMSJohn J. Sims
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v EDWARD L. AKINS, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

No. 29,027

December 20, 1974

*Colonel Victor A. DeFiori, Captain J. D. Miller*and *Captain Leland M. Stenehjem, Jr.*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Donald W. Hansen*and *Captain Gary F. Thorne*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

The staff judge advocate’s post-trial advice to the convening authority did not mention that the judge had recommended suspension of the punitive discharge adjudged at trial. Although an omission of this kind is not by itself ground for corrective action, the record of trial convinces us that the deficiency may have prejudiced the accused in the convening authority’s assessment of the sentence. *United States v Arnold,*21 USCMA 151, 44 CMR 205 (1972). Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Military Review and set aside the action of the convening authority.

The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General. Further proceedings consistent with this opinion may be had before another competent reviewing authority.
Port

Washington

West

Cedarburg

Thiensville

Port

Washington

East

Cedarburg

OE E

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

610

Lake

Michigan

30" 30"

490

45'

43°

87°

92

30 22'

17'

96

17'

43°

000 31

43°

33

000

52'

91

2

89

33 43°

30"

93

22'

47

47

90

48

31

DN

47

48

N

N

99

50'

4

30"

30"

000m

52' 87°

02

000

20'

47'

00

47

15'

38

20'

45'

00

94

470

30 35 38

47

47

32 34

4 560

DP

30"

97

4

39

01

34

47

01

98

37

30"

35

91

FEET

96

4 4

48

540

47

4

47

15'

30"

47

36

47

48

2

37 4

47

48

000m

47

FEET

4

95

4 4

36 87° 47'

FEET

99

47

89

02

47

4 4

DP

47

4

47

87°

48

92

E

DN

98

90

47

93

50'

4

32

47

E 4

95

DP

000m

47

47

000

000m

FEET

4

4 4

4

94

CEDARBURG OE E, WI

2013

Expressway Local Connector

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

Secondary Hwy Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

CEDARBURG OE E QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN-OZAUKEE CO.

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

Imagery..................................................NAIP, June 2010

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2013

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1999

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 16T

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983 (south

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.12

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

DP

DN

4800

16T

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 33 ́

10 MILS

3° 49 ́

68 MILS
6826

#### JORDAN v. CITY OF GREENVILLE.

1. Bonds — Cities and Towns. — Building schoolhouses is such municipal, purpose as municipal bonds may be issued for.

2. Ibid. — A city may issue bonds to refund outstanding maturing bonds without submitting- the question to the qualified electors-of the city, when so authorized by its charter.

Petition by John M. Jordan in the original jurisdiction of this -Court for injunction against City of Greenville to restrain it from issuing certain municipal 'bonds.

*Mr. Wilton H. Burle,*for petitioner.

*Mr. Jos. A. McCullough,*contra.

March *27,*1908.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an application to the Court, in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, for an order enjoining die City of Greenville from issuing bonds sufficient to refund certain bonded indebtedness- existing at the time the Constitution of 1895 was adopted. The original indebtedness amounted to $18,000.

1 The first ground upon which the petitioner prays for the injunction is that “the original issue was invalid, for the reason that the purchase of grounds and the building of school'houses is not á 'corporate purpose’ within the provisions of the Constitution of 1868, Article IX, Section 8.”

*437The case of *Allen*v. *Adams,*66 S. C., 344, 44 S. E., 938, shows that this ground is untenable. See, also, *State*v. *Brock,*66 S. C., 357.

*2*
      **The next ground upon which the petitioner relies is that “under the Constitution of 1895, Article VIII, Section 7, the bonded indebtedness can not 'be created, except by vote of a majority of the electors in the said city, as therein provided.”

In Article VIII, Section 7, of the Constitution, is the following provision: “Nothing herein contained shall prevent the issuing of bonds to an amount sufficient to refund bonded indebtedness existing at the time of the adoption of this Constitution.”

Section 2015 of the Code of Laws contains this provision: “Any city, town, township, or other municipal corporation, for the purpose of refunding or paying the whole or any part of its bonded indebtedness existing at the time of the adoption of the present Constitution, whether the same has matured or not, and any unpaid interest thereon, shall be, and is hereby, authorized and empowered to issue its nego¡tiaible coupon bonds from time to time, and in such amounts as shall be proper, and to use and dispose of the same, either by sale or exchange, for the purposes aforesaid.”

The case of *McCreight*v. *Camden,*49 S. C., 78, 26 S. E., 984, in which the foregoing provision of the Constitution was construed, decides that a city may issue bonds to refund outstanding maturing bonds without submitting the question to the qualified electors of the municipality, when so authorized by its charter. This ground can not be sustained.

The last ground urged by the petitioner is “that the said issue is not authorized by the said Constitution or the laws of South Carolina.”

The petitioner, in this ground, has failed to specify in what particulars the issue of the bonds is not authorized.

It is the judgment of the Court, that the petition be dismissed.
# C_2007198EN.01000201.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/2

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 198/02)

| Reference number of the aid | XT 75/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Region | Vlaams Gewest |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Ad hoc opleidingssteun aan de NV ATLAS COPCO AIRPOWER te Wilrijk (dossier 2007G00033) |
| Legal basis | Decreet betreffende het economisch ondersteuningsbeleid van 31 januari 2003 |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Budget | Annual budget: —; Overall budget: EUR 0,99592 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 23.4.2007 |
| Duration | 22.4.2009 |
| Objective | General training; Specific training |
| Economic sectors | Other manufacturing |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Agentschap Economie |
| Afdeling Economisch Ondersteuningsbeleid |
| Koning Albert II laan 35, bus 12 |
| B-1030 Brussel |

Reference number of the aid

XT 75/07

Member State

Belgium

Region

Vlaams Gewest

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Ad hoc opleidingssteun aan de NV ATLAS COPCO AIRPOWER te Wilrijk (dossier 2007G00033)

Legal basis

Decreet betreffende het economisch ondersteuningsbeleid van 31 januari 2003

Type of measure

Individual aid

Budget

Annual budget: —; Overall budget: EUR 0,99592 million

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation

Date of implementation

23.4.2007

Duration

22.4.2009

Objective

General training; Specific training

Economic sectors

Other manufacturing

Name and address of the granting authority

Agentschap Economie

Afdeling Economisch Ondersteuningsbeleid

Koning Albert II laan 35, bus 12

B-1030 Brussel

---