alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT N. JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2671 LKK PAN

 vs. 

ESTHER DE LA TORRE, et al,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment , filed August 31, 2005, was

submitted on the record. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Local Rule 72-302(b)(17) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

On July 26, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Neither party has filed

objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 26, 2006, are adopted in full;

Case 2:04-cv-02671-LKK -EFB Document 35 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Plaintiff’s August 31, 2005 motion for default judgment is granted;

3. Default judgment against defendants is entered in favor of plaintiff;

4. Defendants are directed to pay plaintiff damages in the amount of $4,000.00;

and

5. Defendants are directed to comply with the terms of this order within ninety

days. 

DATED: September 11, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-02671-LKK -EFB Document 35 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                        ---------------------------------

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Sunrise  U.S.A  Incorporated  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission,(the "Report"), I, Omar Barrientos, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


                                          /s/ Omar Barrientos
March 22, 2004                            -----------------------
                                          Omar Barrientos
                                          Chief Executive Officer and President
SCALE 1:24,000

WINSOR DAM QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-I

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Winsor Dam Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by Janet R. Stone

2013

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1967.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Massachusetts

Geological Survey.

Geology mapped by J.R. Stone in 1976 (unpublished). Some

postglacial units were mapped using 2005 orthophoto images.

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 13 of 24)

(B

ELC

H

E

R

TO

WN)

(WA

R

E)

(PALMER)

(QUABBIN RESERVOIR)

72°15'0"W

72°15'0"W

72°22'30"W

72°22'30"W

42°22'30"N

42°22'30"N

42°15'0"N

42°15'0"N

Stone, J.R., compiler, 2013, Surficial geologic map

of the Mount Grace-Ashburnham-Monson-Webster

24-quadrangle area in central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-I

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/I.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

AND OFFICE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (MassGIS),

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
No. 51764.

#### Protests 799860-G, etc., of Kwong Yuen Shing et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated tnat the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects'to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
# C_2007047EN.01001301.xml

| 1.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/13

---

Notification of a request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC

(2007/C 47/13)

Request from a Member State

On 9 February 2007 the Commission received a request under Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1). The first working day following receipt of the request was 12 February 2007.

1

The request, from the Republic of Finland, concerns postal services and other services as referred to in Article 6(2)(b) and (c) of Directive 2004/17/EC in that country. Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC stipulates that the Directive does not apply if the activity in question is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted. Assessment of these conditions is to be made exclusively under Directive 2004/17/EC and without prejudice to application of the rules on competition.

The Commission has a three-month period from 12 February 2007, i.e. until 12 May 2007, within which to take a decision on this request.

The third subparagraph of Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC does not apply. Consequently, the period within which the Commission must take a decision may be extended by three months. Such an extension would be subject to publication.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1. Directive as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1874/2004 (OJ L 326, 29.10.2004, p. 17).

1

---
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


March 19, 2015


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, High 20 Dividend Strategy Trust,
Series 10


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, High 20 Dividend Strategy Trust, Series 10 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on March 18, 2015, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the
Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-201723) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO________________


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
Exhibit 23.01

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-60430, 333-38696, 333-151882 and 333-160680) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(Nos. 333-87858, 333-111306 and 333-160679) of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2010, relating to the financial statements
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 1, 2010

---



QuickLinks
#### Angela Phillip, Respondent, v Melvin Phillip, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 302]

—Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.), entered June 17, 1993 and June 30, 1994, which, *inter alia,*directed defendant to pay plaintiff temporary child support of $220 a week, to pay half of the college tuition and school-related expenses of the parties’ eldest minor child, to restore medical and dental coverage for the parties’ three minor children, to pay half of any unreimbursed medical and dental expenses incurred on behalf of the children, and to pay plaintiff attorney’s fees of $2,500, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Based upon defendant’s failure to disclose required financial information (22 NYCRR 202.16 [k] [5]), we infer that his income is at least $45,000, in which event the award of temporary child support, including the direction that defendant pay half of the children’s medical and college expenses, was well within the Uniform Child Support Guidelines set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b) (see, *Williamson v Williamson,*196 AD2d 743; *Deutsch v Deutsch,*209 AD2d 359). The award of attorney’s fees was also a proper exercise of discretion (see, *DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rósete,*70 NY2d 879). Defendant’s remedy for any inequities in the temporary award lies in a prompt trial of the action. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Asch and Tom, JJ.
#### State of Kansas, *Appellee,*v. Earl G. Ramsey, *Appellant.*

No. 48,305

Opinion filed December 11, 1976.

*E. Roger Horsky,*of Leavenworth, argued the cause, and was on the brief for the appellant.

*Patrick J. Reardon,*county attorney, argued the cause, and *Curt T. Schneider,*attorney general, was with him on the brief for the appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

Affirmed.
#### Carl S. Gmerek et al., Appellants, v Scrivner, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[634 NYS2d 299]

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that plaintiff Carl S. Gmerek lacks standing, as a shareholder, to sue on the basis of injury to the corporate plaintiffs *(see, New Castle Siding Co. v Wolfson,*97 AD2d 501, *affd*63 NY2d 782) and that plaintiff Klein’s Elm-wood Foods, Inc., lacks standing, as an individual partner in Gmerek’s Foods, to assert causes of action belonging to the partnership itself. "[I]t is settled that a partnership cause of action belongs only to the partnership itself or the partners jointly, and that an individual member of the partnership may only sue and recover on a partnership obligation on the partnership’s behalf *(Stevens v St. Joseph’s Hosp., 52*AD2d 722)”. *(Shea v Hambro Am.,*200 AD2d 371, 371-372).

The court erred, however, in granting summary judgment dismissing the action against Scrivner, Inc., dismissing the third cause of action against Scrivner of New York, Inc. and dismissing the first and second causes of action against defendant Kensington and Harlem, Inc. "As a general rule, a parent corporation is not liable for the acts of a subsidiary” *(Dempsey v Intercontinental Hotel Corp.,*126 AD2d 477, 478, citing *Port Chester Elec. Constr. Corp. v Atlas,*40 NY2d 652). The evidence submitted by plaintiffs, however, raises triable issues of fact whether Scrivner, Inc., so completely dominated the activities of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Scrivner of New York, Inc., and that corporation’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Kensington arid *992Harlem, Inc., that the separate legal identities of the parent and subsidiary corporations may be disregarded *(see, Matter of Morris v New York State Dept of Taxation & Fin.,*82 NY2d 135, 140-142; *Billy v Consolidated Mach. Tool Corp.,*51 NY2d 152, 162-163; *Dempsey v Intercontinental Hotel Corp., supra,*at 478). Further, plaintiff should have the opportunity, through discovery, to explore further the relationship of defendants with respect to the transactions at issue *(see, Youngs v Kissing Bridge Ski Corp.,*216 AD2d 967).

We modify the order on appeal, therefore, by striking subparagraphs (a), (d) and (e) of the first ordering paragraph and otherwise affirm. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J.—Summary Judgment.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 09, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 09, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0219. DARRELL BROWN v. EDWARD D. LUKEMIRE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: NONE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. ER07-121-001] 

Take notice that on March 5, 2007, Allegheny Energy, Inc., Monongahela Power Company, and Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC filed a response to the Commission's December 20, 2006 data request. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 26, 2007.                 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-4624 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March31, 2020 (the “Report”) of Oxford Square Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Jonathan H. CohenName: Jonathan H. CohenDate:April29, 2020
No. 50100.

#### Petition 6287-R of United Import & Export Co. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Determination of the dutiable values of merchandise similar to that covered by the shipments in question was decided in *United States*v. *Mexican Products Co.*(Reap. Dec. 4549) and in *United States*v. *Mexican Products Co.*(28 C. C. P. A. 80, C. A. D. 129), the appellate court finally sustaining the Government’s contention in holding that statutory foreign and export values contemplate the price at which merchandise is freely offered to all purchasers, and therefore in a market where sales are made at varying discounts as well as net prices, the latter must be accepted as meeting all requirements of the law. Additional duties accrued from this judicial construction, and it is an appeal for the remission of such duties that gives rise to the present case. When the case was called for trial a member of the petitioner company, who purchased the merchandise in question, testified that he consulted with the customs officials before any of the entries were made and furnished them with all information at his disposal, revealing the basis for claiming a discount from list prices in the entered values. Government counsel stated that there was no intent on the part of petitioner to defraud the Government. Prom an examination of the record and a consideration of all the facts and circumstances, the petition was granted.
Before the Third Division,

November 8, 1948

No. 52660.

petition 6553-R (San Diego).

#### Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland *v.*United States,

Opinion -by

Ekwall, J.

The petition was dismissed.
June 17, 1964

Reap. Dec. 10779.

reappraisement R60/8562, etc.

#### Metal Purchasing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Reappraisements dismissed April 28, 1964.

Entered at New York, N.T. (Not published.) (Initial No. R60/20864.) Motion by plaintiffs.
No. 46768.

#### Protest 73634-K of Wm. Liddell & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty as claimed.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00672-CR

Jorge Arellano

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 06-CR-0770-E

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 24, 2019
No. 56002.

protest 134349-K (New York).

#### Kachurin Drug Co. v. United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Sulfichton, Lithol N. F. (Iehthammol), Lithol (Iehthammol), Lithol, Saurolo NFS (Iehthammol)” .similar in all material respects to the ammonium ichthosulfonate passed upon in *United States*v. *Kachurin Drug Company*(39 C. C. P. A. 36, C. A. D. 459), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (the Company)
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harold C. Simmons,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory M. Swalwell, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.














/s/
      Harold C. Simmons


Harold
      C.
      Simmons


Chief
      Executive Officer








/s/
      Gregory M. Swalwell


Gregory
      M. Swalwell


Chief
      Financial Officer








August
      6,
      2007








Note:  The
      certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or
      otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
      Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly
      stated in such filing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry R. Johnson, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 391]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered March 22, 1995, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
OI<LAHOMA 

DEPAR!IIf~l Oi ENVIRON!o'EN!Ac OUALJTY 

SCOTT A. THOMPSON 

Executive Director OKlAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAl QUALITY 

September 18, 2015 

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Mr. Ron Curry, Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 

1445 Ross A venue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

MARY FAlLIN 

Governor 

Subject: Evaluation and Information Supporting Oklahoma's Designation Recommendation 

for 2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS for Noble, Choctaw, and Muskogee Counties in Oklahoma 

Dear Administrator Curry: 

As referenced in Governor Fallin's letter of August 17, 2015, attached is our evaluation and 

information to support the State's recommendation for the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency to consider for designation of the affected areas. One hard copy of all documents is 

included, along with one DVD that contains an electronic (.pdf) copy of all documents, as well 

as a copy of the modeling files. 

lf you desire additional infonnation, or you have any questions concerning this matter, please 

contact me, at 405-702-4100. 

"" sexvv 

Eddie Terrill, Director of Air Quality Division 

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality 

cc: Michael Teague, Secretary of Energy and Environment 

Scott Thompson. Executive Director, Department of Environmental Quality 

Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section, US EPA 6 

Carrie Paige, Air Planning Section, US EPA 6 

Dayana Medina, Air Planning Section, US EPA 6 

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73101·1677 

printed on recycled paper with soy onk 

0