alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State, *ex rel.*Jose Quintana, v. Chas. E. Culbreath, as Clerk of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.

179 So. 409.

En Banc.

Opinion Filed February 25, 1938.

*Gibbons, Vega & Gibbons,*for Relator;

*Wm. M. Taliaferro, PI. C. Tillman, Cary D. Landis.*Attorney General, and *Wm . P. Allen,*Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Terrell, J.

The alternative writ herein alleged that Relator owns certain lands in Hillsborough County that were assessed and sold to the State for the non payment of *231State and County taxes for the years 1931 and 1932; that in July, 1937, he caused said certificates to be advertised and sold pursuant to Chapter 18296, Acts of 1937; that Relator was the highest and best bidder for said certificates and that said certificates were assigned to him November 17, 1937, showing payment of all past due taxes except for the year 1937. The writ prays that Respondent be required to perform said certificates to show and include payment of State and County taxes on the lands therein described for the year 1937 and make proper record of the payment thereof or show cause why he refuses to so do.

The return admits the material allegations of the alternative writ but says that Respondent refused to include the taxes for 1937 in the cancelled certificates because said taxes had not been levied and assessed and that in following this procedure, he acted on legal advise to the effect that only taxes which had been actually levied at the time of the sale could be included in the certificates.

The return raises the sole question of whether or not a sale of tax certificates under Chapter 18296, Acts of 1937, made July 15, 1937, should show payment of and include taxes for the year in which the sale was made.

Section 3 of Chapter 18296, Acts of 1937, defining the duties of the Clerk of the Circuit Court gives a complete answer to this question, the pertinent part of which is as follows:

> “He will sell at public outcry to the highest and best bidder for cash, tax certificates covering the lands to be described in said notice, together with all omitted or subsequent taxes including years for which said sale is made.”

The provision quoted shows clearly that the sale of the certificates should include subsequent taxes including the years for which the sale is made. The fact that the taxes *232have not been levied is not a sufficient defense. The statute in this respect is not materially different from other redemption statutes that have been passed from time to time, particularly Section 992, Compiled General Laws of 1927, as amended by Chapter 14572, Acts óf 1929. Computation of the subsequent taxes may follow in like manner as the latter statute if rio levy has been made at the time of sale.

The motion for peremptory writ, notwithstanding the return, was in order and is granted.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford, and Chapman, J. J., concur.
# C_2007110EN.01000901.xml

| 16.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/9 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to open winding-up proceedings in respect of la Mutuelle de l'Allier et des Régions Françaises

(Publication made in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

(2007/C 110/08)

| Insurance undertaking | Mutuelle de l'Allier et des Régions Françaises Assurances (MARF Assurances) 15, Avenue de Théodore de Banville F-03000 Moulins | Mutuelle de l'Allier et des Régions Françaises Assurances (MARF Assurances) | 15, Avenue de Théodore de Banville | F-03000 Moulins |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | --------------------------- |
| Mutuelle de l'Allier et des Régions Françaises Assurances (MARF Assurances) | | | | |
| 15, Avenue de Théodore de Banville | | | | |
| F-03000 Moulins | | | | |
| Date, entry into force and nature of the decision | Decision of 11 January 2007 automatically transferring part of MARF's portfolio of policies and withdrawing its authorisation.
Published in the Official Journal of France on 26 February 2007. | | | |
| Competent authorities | Autorité de contrôle des assurances et des mutuelles (ACAM) 61, rue Taitbout F-75436 Paris Cedex 09 | Autorité de contrôle des assurances et des mutuelles (ACAM) | 61, rue Taitbout | F-75436 Paris Cedex 09 |
| Autorité de contrôle des assurances et des mutuelles (ACAM) | | | | |
| 61, rue Taitbout | | | | |
| F-75436 Paris Cedex 09 | | | | |
| Supervisory authority | Autorité de contrôle des assurances et des mutuelles (ACAM) 61, rue Taitbout F-75436 Paris Cedex 09 | Autorité de contrôle des assurances et des mutuelles (ACAM) | 61, rue Taitbout | F-75436 Paris Cedex 09 |
| Autorité de contrôle des assurances et des mutuelles (ACAM) | | | | |
| 61, rue Taitbout | | | | |
| F-75436 Paris Cedex 09 | | | | |
| Liquidator appointed | M. Alain VAUTIER ALV Conseils 76, Avenue de la Résistance F-93340 Le Raincy Tél. (33-1) 43 02 16 06 | M. Alain VAUTIER | ALV Conseils | 76, Avenue de la Résistance |
| M. Alain VAUTIER | | | | |
| ALV Conseils | | | | |
| 76, Avenue de la Résistance | | | | |
| F-93340 Le Raincy | | | | |
| Tél. (33-1) 43 02 16 06 | | | | |
| Applicable law | France
Article L. 326-12 of the insurance code | | | |

---
(Reap. Dec. 10445)

#### T. D. Downing Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 27121.

(Decided February 13, 1963)

*Tomploins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*401Olxvek, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain aluminum foil, exported from England on May 13, 1959, and entered at the port of Boston.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), and that such statutory value therefor is $0.6115 per pound, net, packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 64889.

#### Kaiser Reismann Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 58/19952 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WALTER R. FOUST, JR., Private First Class, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

20 USCMA 256, 43 CMR 96

No. 23,542

January 8, 1971

*Captain Paul A. Reichs,*USMCR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Michael F. Fasanaro, Jr.,*JAGC, USN, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Failure of the appellant to place in writing his request to be tried by military judge alone renders invalid that proceeding as well as a subsequent rehearing on sentence, also heard by military judge alone, where a second request was reduced to writing. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970). Accordingly, the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review is reversed. The findings of guilty and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. Another trial may be ordered.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Quinn, Chief Judge

(dissenting):

I would affirm. See my dissent in United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).
Exhibit
99.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL
REPORT



Timothy P. Walbridge and Beth Sanders
hereby certify as follows:



1.    They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of 1st Centennial Bancorp.



2.    The Form 10-KSB/A of 1st Centennial Bancorp for the Year Ended December 31, 2002 complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 1st
Centennial Bancorp.



| |  |                      |  | 
| |  | -------------------- |  | 
|
| |  | Date: April 24, 2003 |  | 
| |  |                      |  | 

| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 
|
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |
1 ... S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 43 1- CV I N R E DA VI D MI CH AE L S HE I D R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NALP R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u r t h a s c o n s id e r e d r e la t o r ’s p e t it io n f o r w r ito fm a n d a m u s a n d is o f th e o p i n i o n th a t th e p e ti ti o n i s m o o t b e c a u s e th e tri a l c o u rt g ra n te d re l a to r’s bi l l ofr evi ew i n t he unde r l yi ng pr oce edi ng. Accor di ngl y, r el at or ’ s pet i t i on f or w ri t of m a n d a m u s i s d i sm i ss e d as m o o t.
P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: M C C O Y, D A U PH I N O T, an d GA RD N ER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: J a nu a r y 20, 2009
EX-32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



INFe- HUMAN RESOURCES, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of INFe- Human Resources, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur Viola, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of INFe- Human Resources, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of INFe-Human Resources, Inc.



/s/    ARTHUR VIOLA

- --------------------

Arthur Viola



Chief Executive Officer

Sole Director

and Chief Financial Officer



July 23, 2007









18
May 12, 1953

No. 57332.

Suit 4712.

#### E. H. Corrigan *v.*United States.

Reap. Dec. 8046 reversed and remanded January 14, 1953. C. A. D. 514. Application for rehearing denied March 11, 1953, with a supporting opinion amending certain portions of the original opinion of January 14, 1953, without changing the conclusion. (Note: The decision on rehearing is printed at the end of C. A. D. 514.)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1506]


Expansion/Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 126, Reno, Nevada

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada, 
grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 126, submitted an application to the 
Board for authority to expand and reorganize the zone in the Reno, 
Nevada, area, within the Reno Customs and Border Protection port of 
entry (FTZ Docket 24-2006; filed 6/14/06);
    WHEREAS, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (71 FR 35611, 6/21/06) and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    WHEREAS, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand and reorganize FTZ 126 is approved, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.28, and further subject to a sunset provision that would terminate 
authority on March 31, 2012, for any of the proposed sites (Sites 4-13) 
that have not been activated under FTZ procedures before that date.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12\th\ day of March 2007.

David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5077 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
No. 49234.

#### Protests 957923-G, etc., of Sun Wing Wo Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was assessed and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5 (chemical compounds). The protests were sustained to this extent.
#### Leonard C. Spano, Appellant, v Love & Balducci, et al., Respondents.

[635 NYS2d 569]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that plaintiff failed to meet his burden of proving that, but for the legal malpractice of defendants, his appeal to this Court in the underlying action entitled *Spano v County of Onondaga*would have been successful *(see, Kerson Co. v Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, Levy & Levine,*45 NY2d 730, *affg*59 AD2d 551; *Flinn v Aab,*167 AD2d 507). Based upon our review of the record in that action, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence, the court properly denied plaintiffs motion for a change of venue, the toxicology report was properly admitted into evidence, and the court did not deprive plaintiff of a fair trial. The remaining issues advanced by plaintiff regarding the underlying action are not preserved for our review and, in any event, would not result in a reversal of the judgment in that action.

Furthermore, we reject the contention of plaintiff that the court in this legal malpractice action erred in dismissing the complaint against defendants Ralph A. Cognetti and Gaetano L. Colozzi. We have reviewed the remaining contentions advanced by plaintiff and conclude that they are lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Pooler, J.—Legal Malpractice.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
No. 46773.

#### Protests 998525-G, etc., of Theo. L. Stern & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Counsel for the importer called the examiner who passed the merchandise. He produced a sample which was received in evidence and consists of a small, flat, hexangular-shaped bag made from colored wooden beads with.a strap-like handle of the same material. The bag portion is lined with cotton and has a zipper closing device. He testified that the sample correctly represented the merchandise involved in the two protests herein, the difference being only in pattern and size. Inasmuch as the bags were assessed as in chief value of beads, and the said beads being made of wood, the court assumed that the bags are admittedly in chief value of wood and that therefore the only question *431really involved is that of relative specificity. Since it was agreed that the merchandise consists of a “bag” the court found that the bags in question are more specifically provided for under paragraph 411, and held them dutiable at 50 percent under that paragraph as claimed. *United States*v. *Zinn,*(2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 419, T. D. 32171), *Wilson*v. *United States*(6 id. 255, T. D. 35476) and *United States*v. *Cooper*(22 C. C. P. A. 31, T. D. 47038) followed. *Brody*v. *United States*(2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 15, T. D. 31573), *Krauss*v. *United States*(2 id. 17, T. D. 31574), *Levi*v. *United States,*(7 id. 447, T. D. 37012), *United States*v. *Hooker,*(4 id. 471, T. D. 33884), *United States*v. *Snow*(6 id. 120, T. D. 35388), and *Bischoff*v. *United States*(7 id. 138, T. D. 36458) cited.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5005 

AN ACT 

To authorize additional funding for the San Joaquin River 

Restoration Settlement Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 5005 ES

1 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE SAN JOAQUIN 

2 RIVER RESTORATION SETTLEMENT ACT. 

3 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS TO IMPLE4 MENT SETTLEMENT.—Section 10009 of the San Joaquin 

5 River Restoration Settlement Act (Public Law 111–11; 

6 123 Stat. 1355) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking 

8 ‘‘$250,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$750,000,000’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking 

10 ‘‘$250,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$750,000,000’’. 

11 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

12 FRIANT DIVISION IMPROVEMENTS.—Section 10203(c) of 

13 the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Pub14 lic Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1367) is amended by striking 

15 ‘‘$50,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000,000’’. 

Passed the Senate December 17 (legislative day, December 16), 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5005 

AN ACT 

Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act. 

To authorize additional funding for the San
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory  Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease  Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting of the aforementioned SEP: 

*Time and Date:*                         1 p.m.-3 p.m., April 26, 2007 (Closed).                     

*Place:*                         Teleconference. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333.                     

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director,                               ( print page 12178)                            Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                     

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of scientific merit of grant applications received in response to RFA DD07-006, “China-United States Collaborative, Population-Based Surveillance and Research Program for Maternal-Child and Family Health.”                     

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Juliana Cyril, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone 404.639.4639.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: March 8, 2007. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E7-4744 Filed 3-14-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
No. 48573.

#### Protests 713884-G, etc., of Grinnell Export Lumber Co. et al. (Seattle).

*222Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Myers*(24 C. C. P. A. 156, T. D. 48640) and *Myers*v. *United States*(T. D. 49530), the claim that an allowance should have been made for planing, tonguing, and/or grooving was sustained, as specified herein.
61°45'E 62°E

33°15'N
3630000

36 70000

366500?

33°N

36 50000

EXPLANATION | 0 10 KILOMETERS

—— Road & Peak |——_

—-— Stream, mostly intermittant L__] Image quadrant or tile 9 5 MILES
O City, town, or village
—- Province boundary
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-480]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10780]


Missouri Disaster <greek-i> MO-00007

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Missouri (FEMA-
1673-DR), dated 12/29/2006.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storms.
    Incident Period: 11/30/2006 through 12/02/2006
    Effective Date: 12/29/2006.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/27/2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 12/29/2006, private non-
profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Boone, Cole, Greene, Iron, Reynolds, St. Francois, St. Louis, St. 
Louis (City), Ste. Genevieve, Washington.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             5.250
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10780.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008).

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-480 Filed 1-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P