Use these links to rapidly review the documentTABLE OF CONTENTS Allos Therapeutics, Inc. Index to Financial Statements

Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.For the transition period
from                        to                
        .


Commission File Number 00029815



Allos Therapeutics, Inc.(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

54-1655029(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)11080 CirclePoint Road, Suite 200
Westminster, Colorado 80020
(303) 426-6262(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of principal executive offices)Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Common Stock $.001 Par Value

NASDAQ Stock Market LLC(NASDAQ Global Market)(Title of class)

(Name of each exchange on which registered)Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None




Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o    No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o    No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405) of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o    No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer ý

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o


Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o    No ý

The aggregate market value of common stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing sale price of such shares on the NASDAQ Global Market
on June 30, 2009) was $517,871,691. Shares of the registrant's common stock held by each current executive officer and director and by each stockholder who is known by the registrant to own 10%
or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from this computation in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. Share ownership information of certain persons
known by the registrant to own greater than 10% of the outstanding common stock for purposes of the preceding calculation is based solely on information on Schedules 13D and 13G, if any, filed
with the Commission. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As
of February 25, 2010, there were 104,724,779 shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the
Registrant's fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated therein.



---





Table of Contents



TABLE OF CONTENTS



PagePART IITEM 1.

BUSINESS

3ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

23ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

42ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

42ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

42ITEM 4.

RESERVED

42PART IIITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

43ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

45ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

46ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

61ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

61ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

61ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

61ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

62PART IIIITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

63ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

63ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

64ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

64ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

64PART IVITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

65SIGNATURES

69


2

---





Table of Contents

PART I

Allos Therapeutics, Inc., the Allos Therapeutics, Inc. logo, FOLOTYN, the FOLOTYN logo and all
other Allos names are trademarks of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. in the United States and in other selected countries. All other brand names or trademarks appearing in this report are the property
of their respective holders. Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this report to "Allos," the "Company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to Allos
Therapeutics, Inc.

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our commercialization of FOLOTYN for patients with relapsed or
refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma; our projected timeline to present and the potential implications of the top line results from our Phase 2b trial comparing FOLOTYN and
erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, our intent and projected timeline to submit a Marketing Authorization Application, or MAA for FOLOTYN, in Europe; our
projected operating costs and expenses for fiscal year 2010; other statements regarding our future product development and regulatory strategies, including our intent to develop or seek regulatory
approval for FOLOTYN for additional indications; the ability of our third-party manufacturers to support our requirements for drug supply; any statements regarding our future financial performance,
results of operations or sufficiency of capital resources to fund our operating requirements; and any other statements
that are other than statements of historical fact. In some cases, these statements may be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes,"
"estimates," "predicts," "potential" or "continue," or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking
statements contained herein are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that
may cause our, or our industry's results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that may
cause or contribute to such differences include, among other things, those discussed under the captions "Business," "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations." Forward-looking statements not specifically described above also may be found in these and other sections of this report. All forward-looking statements included in this report
are based on information available to us as of the date hereof and we undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any subsequent events or circumstances. You
are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and our
website.

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

We incorporated in the Commonwealth of Virginia on September 1, 1992 as HemoTech Sciences, Inc. and filed amended
Articles of Incorporation to change our name to Allos Therapeutics, Inc. on October 19, 1994. We reincorporated in Delaware on October 28, 1996. We completed our initial public
offering in 2000 and our shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, where our symbol is ALTH. Our corporate headquarters are located in Westminster, Colorado, a suburb of Denver. Our mailing
address is 11080 CirclePoint Road, Suite 200, Westminster, Colorado 80020. Our website address iswww.allos.com; however, information found on
our website is not incorporated by reference into this report. We operate as a single business segment.

Corporate Overview and Business Strategy

We are a biopharmaceutical company committed to the development and commercialization of innovative anti-cancer
therapeutics. Our goal is to build a profitable company by generating income from products we develop and commercialize, either alone or with one or more potential strategic

3

---



Table of Contents

partners.
We strive to develop proprietary products that have the potential to improve the standard of care in cancer therapy.

We
are currently focused on the development and commercialization of FOLOTYN (pralatrexate injection). FOLOTYN is a targeted antifolate inhibitor designed to accumulate
preferentially in cancer cells. FOLOTYN targets the inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase, or DHFR, an enzyme critical in the folate pathway, thereby interfering with DNA and RNA synthesis and
triggering cancer cell death. FOLOTYN can be delivered as a single agent, for which we currently have approval for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell
lymphoma, or PTCL, and has the potential to be used in combination therapy regimens. We believe that FOLOTYN's unique mechanism of action offers us the ability to target the drug for development in a
variety of hematological malignancies and solid tumor indications. We currently retain exclusive worldwide commercial rights to FOLOTYN for all indications. We may also seek to grow our product
portfolio through product acquisition and in-licensing efforts.

On
September 24, 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, granted accelerated approval of FOLOTYN for use as a single agent for the treatment of patients with relapsed
or refractory PTCL. This approval was based on overall response rate from our pivotal PROPEL trial. Clinical benefit such as improvement in progression-free survival or overall survival
has not been demonstrated. FOLOTYN represents our first drug approved for marketing in the United States. FOLOTYN is the first and only drug approved by the FDA for this indication and represents a
new treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. In connection with the accelerated approval, we are required to conduct several post-approval studies. We began making
FOLOTYN available for commercial sale in the United States on October 5, 2009 and commenced our commercial launch in January 2010 with approximately 50 sales specialists.

4

---



Table of Contents

In
addition to relapsed or refractory PTCL, we are currently evaluating FOLOTYN in a number of other hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. The following table summarizes the target
indications and clinical development status of the FOLOTYN development program:

Line of Therapy/Indication

Phase

StatusHEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIESPeripheral T-cell Lymphoma2nd line+: PROPEL Pivotal Study

2

FDA accelerated approval on 9/24/09; Commercial launch in January 20101st Line: CHOP sequential study*

3

Planned initiation in 2010Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma2nd Line+: Single agent study in relapsed or refractory CTCL

1

Expansion cohort at optimal dose enrolling2nd Line: Bexarotene combination*bexarotene +/- FOLOTYN

1/3

Phase 1 MTD study to begin in 2010Lymphoma2nd Line+: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma combinationFOLOTYN + gemcitabine

1/2a

Phase 2a patient enrollment ongoing2nd Line+: B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

2

Patient enrollment ongoingSOLID TUMORSNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer2nd & 3rd Line: Current or former smokers, Stage IIIB/IVFOLOTYN vs.
erlotinib

2b

Enrollment complete; top line results expected Q2 2010Bladder Cancer2nd Line: Metastatic relapsed transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urinary bladder

2

Patient enrollment ongoing


*These
studies are required by the FDA as a condition of the accelerated approval of FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL and
must verify the clinical benefit of FOLOTYN.


Our
goal is to build a profitable company by generating income from products we develop and commercialize, either alone or with one or more potential strategic partners. The key elements
of our strategy are to:



5

---



Table of Contents



FOLOTYNTM (pralatrexate injection)

FOLOTYN is a targeted antifolate inhibitor designed to accumulate preferentially in cancer cells. Based on preclinical studies, we
believe that FOLOTYN selectively enters cells expressing RFC-1, a protein that is over expressed on cancer cells compared to normal cells. Once inside cancer cells, FOLOTYN is efficiently
polyglutamylated, which makes it less susceptible to efflux-based drug resistance and leads to high intracellular drug retention. Inside the cell, FOLOTYN targets the inhibition of DHFR, an enzyme
critical in the folate pathway, thereby interfering with DNA and RNA synthesis and triggering cancer cell death.

The
antimetabolites, including antifolates such as FOLOTYN, are a group of low-molecular weight compounds that exert their effect by virtue of their structural or functional
similarity to naturally occurring molecules involved in DNA synthesis. Because the cell mistakes them for a normal metabolite, the antimetabolites either inhibit critical enzymes involved in DNA
synthesis or become incorporated into the nucleic acid, producing incorrect codes. Both mechanisms result in inhibition of DNA synthesis and ultimately, cell death. Because of their primary effect on
DNA synthesis, the antimetabolites are most effective against actively dividing cells and are largely cell-cycle phase specific. There are three classes of antimetabolites; purine
analogs, pyrimidine analogs and folic acid analogs, also termed antifolates. FOLOTYN is a folic acid analog.

The
selectivity of antifolates for tumor cells involves their conversion to a polyglutamated form by the enzyme folypolyglutamyl synthetase. Polyglutamation is a time- and
concentration-dependent process that occurs in tumor cells, and to a lesser extent, normal tissue. The selective activity of the folic acid analogs in malignant cells versus normal cells likely is due
to the relative difference in polyglutamate formation. Polyglutamated metabolites have prolonged intracellular half-life, increased duration of drug action and are potent inhibitors of
several folate-dependent enzymes, including DHFR.

We
believe that the resistance of malignant cells to the effects of the folic acid analogs may, in part, be due to impaired polyglutamation. We believe the improved antitumor effects of
FOLOTYN in comparison to methotrexate, as observed in preclinical studies, is likely due to the more effective

6

---



Table of Contents

uptake
and transport of FOLOTYN into the cell followed by the greater accumulation of FOLOTYN and its metabolites within the tumor cell through the formation of the polyglutamated derivatives.

FOLOTYN Approved for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory PTCL

On September 24, 2009, the FDA granted accelerated approval of FOLOTYN for use as a single agent for the treatment of patients
with relapsed or refractory PTCL. FOLOTYN is the first and only drug approved by the FDA for this indication and represents a new treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. We
began making FOLOTYN available for commercial sale in the United States on October 5, 2009 and commenced our commercial launch of FOLOTYN in January 2010.

T-cell
lymphoma comprises a biologically diverse group of blood cancers that account for approximately 10 to 15 percent of all cases of non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma, or NHL, in the United States. According to the American Cancer Society, an estimated 66,000 new cases of NHL were expected to be diagnosed in the United States in 2009. We estimate the
incidence of newly diagnosed PTCL in the United States in 2010 to be approximately 5,900 patients. In addition, we estimate the prevalence of PTCL in the United States to be approximately 20,900
patients, including approximately 10,300 patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. There are currently no pharmaceutical agents approved for use in the treatment of first-line PTCL and,
prior to the recent approval of FOLOTYN, there were no pharmaceutical agents approved for use in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. In addition to those PTCL patients who do
not respond to
first-line treatment, a significant number of first-line multi-agent chemotherapy responders relapse after treatment. According to the clinical literature, patients with PTCL
have an overall five-year survival rate of approximately 25% to 40% depending on sub-type.

We
have established a commercial organization, including sales, marketing, supply chain management and reimbursement capabilities, to drive sales of FOLOTYN in the United States.
Currently, our commercial organization includes approximately 50 sales specialists. We believe the U.S. market for relapsed or refractory PTCL is addressable with a targeted sales and marketing
organization, and we intend to promote FOLOTYN ourselves in the United States.

We
have also established the Allos Support for Assisting Patients, or ASAP program, to facilitate access to FOLOTYN by providing reimbursement resources to uninsured, underinsured and
insured patients, and reimbursement support to healthcare providers. In addition, through the ASAP program, indigent patients who are not eligible for reimbursement may obtain free drug.

In
October 2009, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, or NCCN, updated its Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas to include
FOLOTYN as a suggested treatment regimen for all patients with second-line PTCL. NCCN is recognized by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and private payers as a mandated
reference for oncology coverage policies. Managed care, medical directors, pharmacy benefit directors and other healthcare professionals also reference NCCN compendia when making treatment and
reimbursement decisions.

FOLOTYN
was approved by the FDA based on the results from PROPEL, an open-label, single-arm, multi-center, international clinical trial that enrolled 115 patients
with relapsed or refractory PTCL, 109 of whom were considered evaluable for efficacy according to the trial protocol. Patients were considered evaluable if they received at least one dose of FOLOTYN,
their diagnosis of PTCL was confirmed by independent pathology review, and they had relapsed or refractory disease after at least one prior treatment. Patients were treated with FOLOTYN at 30
mg/m2 once weekly by intravenous push over 3-5 minutes for 6 weeks in 7-week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. In addition,
patients received 1 mg of vitamin B12 intramuscularly every 8-10 weeks and 1.0-1.25 mg of folic acid orally on a daily basis.

7

---



Table of Contents

The
primary efficacy endpoint of the trial was overall response rate (complete response, complete response unconfirmed and partial response) as assessed by International Workshop
Criteria, or IWC.
The key secondary efficacy endpoint was duration of response. Response assessments were scheduled at the end of cycle 1 and then every other cycle (every 14 weeks). Duration of response was
measured from the first day of documented response to disease progression or death. Response and disease progression were evaluated by independent central review using the IWC. The results of the
trial demonstrated that 29 of 109 evaluable patients, or 27%, responded to FOLOTYN. The median duration of response was 287 days, or 9.4 months (range 1-503 days).
Thirteen of 109 evaluable patients had a duration of response greater-than or equal to 14 weeks (range 98-503 days). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were
thrombocytopenia, which was observed in 33% of patients; mucositis in 21% of patients; neutropenia in 20% of patients; and anemia in 17% of patients.

In
December 2009, updated results from the PROPEL trial were presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. The updated results
demonstrated that patients treated with FOLOTYN achieved an overall response rate of 29% (32 of 109 evaluable patients) with 63% of patients responding within the first cycle of therapy. The median
duration of response was 10.1 months and median overall survival was 14.5 months.

The
FDA has awarded orphan drug status to FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with T-cell lymphoma, which includes patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. Orphan drug
designation is granted by the FDA to drugs intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which for this program is defined as having a prevalence of less than 200,000 individuals in the United
States. Under the U.S. Orphan Drug Act, the first company to receive FDA approval for an orphan drug for a designated indication obtains seven years of marketing exclusivity during which the FDA may
not approve another company's application for the same orphan drug for the same orphan indication. Because the FDA approved pralatrexate (which we market as FOLOTYN) for the treatment of patients with
relapsed or refractory PTCL, a subset of T-cell lymphoma, we expect to receive seven years of marketing exclusivity for that indication. However, if a competitive product that is the same
as FOLOTYN, as defined under the applicable regulations, is shown to be clinically superior to our product in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL, or if a competitive product is
different from FOLOTYN, as defined under the applicable regulations, the orphan drug exclusivity we have obtained may not block the approval of such competitive product.

FOLOTYN Post-approval Clinical Studies

FOLOTYN was approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL under the FDA's accelerated approval program, which
allows the FDA to approve products for cancer or other life-threatening diseases based on initial positive clinical data. As a condition of approval, we are required to conduct the
following post-approval studies that are intended to verify and describe FOLOTYN's clinical benefit in patients with T-cell lymphoma and assess whether FOLOTYN poses a serious
risk of altered drug levels resulting from organ impairment:



8

---



Table of Contents



The
final design of the Phase 3 studies, including number of patients, clinical endpoints and other study details, remains subject to review and approval by the FDA. Failure to
complete these post-approval studies or adhere to the timelines set by the FDA could result in penalties, including fines or withdrawal of FOLOTYN from the market, unless we are able to
demonstrate good cause for not completing the studies or adhering to the timelines. The FDA may also initiate proceedings to withdraw approval if our Phase 3 post-approval studies
fail to
verify the clinical benefit of FOLOTYN. Further, the FDA may require us to strengthen the warnings and precautions section of the FOLOTYN package insert based on the results of the Phase 1
studies.

FOLOTYN Clinical Development Program

We are developing FOLOTYN both as a single agent and in combination therapy regimens in a variety of hematologic malignancies and solid
tumor indications. The following investigational trials involving FOLOTYN are currently ongoing:



Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, or CTCL, is comprised of a number of indolent non-Hodgkin's T-cell
lymphomas, including mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome, which have their primary manifestations in the skin. According to the Lymphoma Research Foundation, CTCL accounts for approximately 2% to 3%
of the estimated 66,000 new cases of NHL diagnosed each year in the United States. According to the Cutaneous Lymphoma Foundation, the prevalence of CTCL in the United States is estimated between
16,000 and 20,000 cases.

9

---



Table of Contents

In August 2007, we initiated patient enrollment in a Phase 1, open-label, multi-center study of FOLOTYN with vitamin B12 and folic
acid supplementation in patients with relapsed or refractory CTCL. In this study, patients with either relapsed or refractory CTCL receive FOLOTYN as part of a weekly schedule for two or three weeks
followed by one week of rest. In the Phase 1 dose de-escalation portion, patients received a starting dose of FOLOTYN at 30 mg/m2, with dose reduction in subsequent
cohorts to identify an optimal dose for patients with CTCL based on tolerability and efficacy.

In
December 2009, interim data from this study were presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. Data were presented on 31 patients
with relapsed or refractory CTCL who had received a median of 4 prior systemic therapies. The dosing regimen of 15 mg/m2 weekly for three weeks out of a four-week cycle was
determined to be the optimal starting dose and schedule that provided activity with tolerability. In this dose de-escalating study, 18 patients received FOLOTYN at the optimal dose or
higher. Responses were observed in 11 of these 18 patients, or 61%. In the overall study, which included doses lower than the optimal dose, responses were observed in 12 of 31 patients, or 39%,
including two complete responses and nine partial responses in patients who received FOLOTYN. No Grade 4 adverse events were observed. The most common Grade 3 adverse event was stomatitis, or
mouth ulcers (13%). The incidence of hematological adverse events were low with thrombocytopenia (3%) and neutropenia (3%) observed in one patient. The most common adverse events, any grade,
were nausea (52%) and fatigue (48%).

We
recently completed enrollment in an expansion cohort of 23 patients at the optimal dose of 15 mg/m2 weekly for three weeks out of a four-week cycle.
Patient follow-up is ongoing.

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Hodgkin's Lymphoma

According to the American Cancer Society, an estimated 66,000 new cases of NHL were expected to be diagnosed in the United States in
2009. Approximately 85% of NHL patients represent patients with B-cell lymphoma. Based on data from the American Cancer Society, we estimate the incidence of NHL has grown approximately
4.0% annually from 2005 through 2009. Patients with indolent or low-grade NHL may have survival rates as long as 10 years, yet the disease is frequently incurable. Aggressive
lymphomas generally result in shorter median survival times although patients with these malignancies can be cured in 30 to 60% of cases.

In
May 2007, we initiated patient enrollment in a Phase 1/2a, open-label, multi-center study of FOLOTYN and gemcitabine with vitamin B12 and folic acid
supplementation in patients with relapsed or refractory NHL or Hodgkin's lymphoma. In the Phase 1 portion of this study, patients with either relapsed or refractory NHL or Hodgkin's lymphoma
received FOLOTYN either concurrently on the same day with or followed on sequential days by gemcitabine as part of a weekly schedule for three or four weeks or every two weeks with concurrent vitamin
B12 and folic acid supplementation. We enrolled 35 evaluable patients in the Phase 1 portion of the study with the objective of determining the maximum tolerated dose, or MTD,
safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of escalating doses of sequential or same day administration of FOLOTYN and gemcitabine. The MTD for the sequential dosing regimen was determined to
be 10 mg/m2 of FOLOTYN followed on sequential days by 400 mg/m2 of gemcitabine in an every two week schedule. The MTD for the same day regimen was determined
to be 15 mg/m2 of FOLOTYN and 600 mg/m2 of gemcitabine in an every two week schedule. The Phase 2a portion of the trial is currently ongoing and will
seek to enroll up to 90 patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL, PTCL or Hodgkin's lymphoma at the established MTDs to assess preliminary efficacy of FOLOTYN and gemcitabine in
both the sequential and same-day dosing regimens.

In
December 2009, updated results from this study were presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. Data were presented on 35
patients, 33 of whom were evaluable for response. Patients with relapsed or refractory NHL and Hodgkin's lymphoma were administered a combination of FOLOTYN and gemcitabine according to three
regimens: on the same day every two

10

---



Table of Contents

weeks,
on sequential days every two weeks, or on sequential days once weekly for three weeks of a four week cycle. These data demonstrated that treatment with FOLOTYN and gemcitabine is feasible, with
acceptable toxicity, when administered on an every two week schedule. The dose administered of each
drug is higher when given on the same day schedule as compared to treating on sequential day schedule. In this dose ranging study, preliminary results showed activity of the combination of FOLOTYN and
gemcitabine in lymphoid malignancies with a 24% overall response rate in this heavily pretreated population.

In
September 2009, we initiated patient enrollment in a Phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multi-center trial of FOLOTYN in patients with relapsed or
refractory B-cell NHL. This trial will seek to enroll approximately 27 evaluable patients in up to 10 investigative sites worldwide. The primary endpoint of the study is objective response
rate (complete and partial response) as assessed by IWC. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and the safety and tolerability of
FOLOTYN.

In
October 2008, the FDA granted orphan drug designation to FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma and for the treatment of patients with diffuse large
B-cell lymphoma.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the United States. According to the American Cancer Society, an estimated
219,440 new cases of lung cancer were expected to be diagnosed in the United States in 2009. NSCLC is the most common type of lung cancer, accounting for approximately 85% of lung cancer cases,
according to the American Cancer Society. More people die of lung cancer than of breast, prostate and colorectal cancers combined.

In
January 2008, we initiated patient enrollment in a Phase 2b, randomized, international, multi-center study comparing FOLOTYN and erlotinib in 2nd or
3rd line patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who are, or have been, cigarette smokers who have failed treatment with at least one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen.
We completed enrollment of this study in July 2009 with 201 patients. The study objective is to determine the treatment effect of both drugs in predefined patient cohorts, including light vs. heavy
smokers; current vs. former smokers; squamous vs. non-squamous histology; and patients who received prior pemetrexed vs. those who have not. The primary endpoint of the study is overall
survival. Secondary endpoints include response rate and progression-free survival, both compared to erlotinib, and the safety and tolerability of FOLOTYN. The outcome of this study is
intended to inform the design of a global Phase 3 registration study. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either the FOLOTYN arm or the erlotinib arm. Patients randomized to the FOLOTYN arm
received FOLOTYN as an intravenous, or IV, push administered on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week/28 day cycle. The initial dose of FOLOTYN was 190 mg/m2, which, based on
defined criteria, may be increased to 230 mg/m2 or reduced in 40 mg/m2 decrements. Patients randomized to the erlotinib arm received erlotinib 150 mg/day orally for
the 4-week/28 day cycle. Patients in both arms received concurrent vitamin therapy of B12 and folic acid. We currently expect to report top line results of the trial in
the second quarter of 2010, although the actual timing may vary based upon a number of factors.

Two
prior clinical studies of FOLOTYN in NSCLC formed the basis of the ongoing randomized Phase 2b study. An open-label, single-agent, single-center Phase 2
study of FOLOTYN in patients with relapsed or refractory Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC at a dose of 135-150 mg/m2 demonstrated a response rate of 11%, a median time to
progression of three months and a median survival time of 13.5 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was stomatitis, which occurred in 21% of the patients. As a result of
subsequent research that suggested supplementation of FOLOTYN with folic acid and vitamin B12 may reduce the incidence of clinically significant stomatitis, we initiated a Phase 1
dose escalation study of FOLOTYN with vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation in patients with previously treated Stage IIIB/IV advanced NSCLC. In September 2009, updated data
from this trial were presented at the

11

---



Table of Contents

joint
15th Congress of the European CanCer Organization and 34th Congress of the European Society for Medical Oncology. The optimal dose of FOLOTYN with
vitamin supplementation was determined to be 190 mg/m2 every two weeks. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies. An overall response rate of 10% was observed, including two long
duration complete remissions of 26+ and 21+ months with these patients still on therapy at the time of the presentation.

Bladder Cancer

According to the American Cancer Society, an estimated 70,980 new cases of bladder cancer were expected to be diagnosed in the United
States in 2009. TCC is the most common form of bladder cancer, accounting for more than 97% of all bladder cancers. There are currently no agents approved in the United States for the treatment of
advanced or metastatic relapsed TCC of the urinary bladder.

In
July 2008, we initiated patient enrollment in a Phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multi-center study of FOLOTYN in patients with advanced or metastatic
relapsed TCC of the urinary bladder. The primary endpoint of the study is objective response rate (complete and partial response). Secondary endpoints include duration of response, clinical benefit
rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and the safety and tolerability of FOLOTYN. The study will seek to enroll approximately 41 patients in up to 20 investigative sites
worldwide. Patients receive FOLOTYN as an IV push administered on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week/28 day cycle. The initial dose of FOLOTYN is 190 mg/m2, which may be
adjusted based on criteria defined in the protocol. Patients receive concurrent vitamin therapy of B12 and folic acid.

In
March 2009, the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, granted Orphan Medicinal Product Designation to FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with non-papillary TCC of the
urinary bladder. The EMA Orphan Medicinal Product Designation is intended to promote the development of drugs that may provide significant benefit to patients suffering from rare diseases identified
as life-threatening or very serious. Under EMA guidelines, Orphan Medicinal Product Designation provides ten years of potential market exclusivity once the product is approved for
marketing for the designated indication in the European Union.

Additional Indications

In addition to our ongoing NSCLC and bladder cancer studies, we are evaluating the potential future development of FOLOTYN for other
solid tumor indications, including Stage IV breast cancer and recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, among others. There can be no assurances that we will pursue the development of FOLOTYN
for one or more of these indications or that such development efforts will be ultimately successful.

FOLOTYN Development and Product Availability Outside of the United States

We currently retain exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize FOLOTYN for all indications. Based on the results of the
PROPEL trial, we intend to seek regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN in Europe for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. Our current intention is to submit an MAA in Europe in
the fourth quarter of 2010. We may also seek regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL in Japan and other countries. Similar to the United
States, there is a high unmet medical need with no approved agents in either Europe or Japan for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. We intend to enter into
co-promotion or out-licensing arrangements with other pharmaceutical or biotechnology partners where necessary to reach foreign market segments and when deemed strategically
and economically advisable.

Based
on our internal research, we estimate the incidence of newly diagnosed PTCL in the top five European markets (Germany, France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom) in 2010 to be

12

---



Table of Contents

approximately
6,000  7,000 patients, with an estimated 4,500  6,000 2nd-line PTCL patients. Likewise, based on our
internal research, we estimate the incidence of newly diagnosed PTCL in Japan in 2010 to be approximately 3,700  4,100 patients, with an estimated
2,800  3,500 2nd-line PTCL patients.

We
currently provide healthcare professionals outside of the United States with access to FOLOTYN through a named patient program, which is a mechanism through which physicians can
legally and ethically prescribe investigational drugs under individual country-specific guidelines for patients prior to marketing approval.

The
EMA has granted Orphan Medicinal Product Designation to FOLOTYN for the treatment of PTCL.

Manufacturing

The production of FOLOTYN employs small molecule organic chemistry procedures standard for the pharmaceutical industry. We outsource
the manufacturing of FOLOTYN to third-party manufacturers. We have arrangements with one third-party manufacturer to produce FOLOTYN bulk drug substance and two third-party manufacturers to produce
FOLOTYN formulated drug product. Two of these third-party manufacturers supplied FOLOTYN drug product for our commercial sales commencing in the fourth quarter of 2009. We believe our third-party
manufacturers have the capability to meet our future clinical trial and commercial requirements, although we cannot be assured of this. We are in the process of establishing additional suppliers for
the commercial production of FOLOTYN bulk drug substance and formulated drug product. Prior to receiving FDA approval of FOLOTYN, all costs related to purchases of the active pharmaceutical ingredient
and the manufacturing of FOLOTYN were recorded as research and development expense. As such, we have established supplies of FOLOTYN bulk drug substance and formulated drug product that are not
recorded on our balance sheet as inventory.

We
plan to continue to outsource manufacturing responsibilities for FOLOTYN and any additional future product candidates. We believe this manufacturing strategy allows us to direct our
financial and managerial resources to the development and commercialization of products rather than to the establishment of a manufacturing infrastructure. We believe it also enables us to minimize
fixed costs and capital expenditures, while gaining access to advanced manufacturing process capabilities and expertise. However, if our third party suppliers become unable or unwilling to provide
sufficient future drug supply or meet regulatory requirements relating to the manufacture of pharmaceutical agents, we would be forced to incur additional expenses to secure alternative third party
manufacturing arrangements and may suffer delays in our ability to conduct clinical trials or commercialize FOLOTYN or future products.

Sales and Marketing

We have established a commercial organization, including sales, marketing, supply chain management and reimbursement capabilities, to
drive sales of FOLOTYN in the United States. Currently, our commercial organization includes approximately 50 sales specialists. We believe the U.S. market for relapsed or refractory PTCL is
addressable with a targeted sales and marketing organization, and we intend to promote FOLOTYN ourselves in the United States for this and any additional indications we may obtain in the future. If we
obtain regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN in foreign jurisdictions for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or any other indications, we may enter into
co-promotion or out-licensing arrangements with other pharmaceutical or biotechnology firms where necessary to reach such foreign market segments and when deemed strategically
and economically advisable.

13

---



Table of Contents

Intellectual Property

We believe that patent protection and trade secret protection are important to our business and that our future success will depend, in
part, on our ability to maintain our technology licenses, maintain trade secret protection, obtain and maintain patents and operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others both in the
United States and abroad. We believe that obtaining identical patents and protection periods for a given technology throughout all markets of the world will be difficult because of differences in
patent laws. In addition, the protection provided by non-U.S. patents, if any, may be weaker than that provided by U.S. patents.

In
order to protect the confidentiality of our technology, including trade secrets and know-how and other proprietary technical and business information, we require all of
our employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements that prohibit the use or disclosure of confidential information. The agreements also oblige our
employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to assign or license to us ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions made by such persons in connection with their work with us. We cannot be
sure that these agreements will maintain confidentiality, will prevent disclosure, or will protect our proprietary information or intellectual property, or that others will not independently develop
substantially equivalent proprietary information or intellectual property.

The
pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive and patents have been applied for by, and issued to, other parties relating to products or new technologies that may be competitive with
those being developed by us. Therefore, FOLOTYN may give rise to claims that it infringes the patents or proprietary rights of other parties now or in the future. Furthermore, to the extent that we,
our consultants, or manufacturing and research collaborators, use intellectual property owned by others in work performed for us, disputes may also arise as to the rights to such intellectual property
or in related or resulting know-how and inventions. An adverse claim could subject us to significant liabilities to such other parties and/or require disputed rights to be licensed from
such other parties. A license required under any such patents or proprietary rights may not be available to us, or may not be available on acceptable terms. If we do not obtain such licenses, we may
encounter delays in product market introductions, or may find that we are prevented from the development, manufacture or sale of products requiring such licenses. In addition, we could incur
substantial costs in defending ourselves in legal proceedings instituted before patent and trademark offices in the United States, the European Union, or other ex-U.S. territories, or in a
suit brought against us by a private party based on such patents or proprietary rights, or in a suit by us asserting our patent or proprietary rights against another party, even if the outcome is not
adverse to us.

FOLOTYN License Agreement

In December 2002, we entered into a license agreement with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, SRI International and Southern
Research Institute, as amended, under which we obtained exclusive worldwide rights to a portfolio of patents and patent applications related to FOLOTYN and its uses. The portfolio currently consists
of three issued patents in the United States, two granted patents in Europe, and pending patent applications in the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, Japan, China, Brazil, Indonesia, India,
South Korea, Mexico, Norway, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore and South Africa. The licensed patents and applications, which expire at various times between July 2017 and May 2025, contain
claims covering FOLOTYN substantially free of 10-deazaaminopterin, methods to treat tumors with FOLOTYN substantially free of 10-deazaaminopterin, treatment of breast, lung,
and prostate cancer and leukemia with a combination of FOLOTYN and a taxane, treatment of T-cell lymphoma with FOLOTYN, treatment of lymphoma with a combination of FOLOTYN and gemcitabine,
methods of assessing sensitivity of a tumor to FOLOTYN, and other methods and compositions.

14

---



Table of Contents

Under
the terms of the agreement, we paid an up-front license fee of $2.0 million upon execution of the agreement and have made aggregate milestone payments of
$2.5 million based on the passage of time. Additionally, in May and September 2009, we made milestone payments of $1.5 million based on the FDA accepting our New Drug Application for
review and $5.8 million based on the FDA approval to market FOLOTYN, respectively. The up-front license fee and all milestone payments under the agreement prior to FDA approval to
market FOLOTYN were recorded to
research and development expense as incurred. The $5.8 million milestone payment based on the FDA approval was capitalized as an intangible asset and is being amortized over the expected useful
life of the composition of matter patent for FOLOTYN, which we expect to last until July 16, 2022. The only remaining potential milestone payment under the license agreement is for
$3.5 million upon regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN in Europe, which, if made would be capitalized and amortized over the expected useful life. In addition, we will pay the licensors
royalties based on graduated annual levels of net sales of FOLOTYN to our distributors, net of actual rebates and chargebacks, or distributor sales, which may be different than our net product revenue
recognized in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, or sublicense revenues arising from sublicensing the product, if and when such sales or sublicenses occur.
Royalties are 8% of annual distributor sales up to $150.0 million; 9% of annual distributor sales of $150.0 million through $300.0 million; and 11% of annual distributor sales in
excess of $300.0 million. In 2009, our royalties were 8% of our net distributor sales.

Customers

We sell FOLOTYN to a limited number of pharmaceutical wholesale distributors, or distributors, who then resell FOLOTYN to patients'
respective health care providers. We had $3.6 million of net product sales for the year ended December 31, 2009, all of which related to sales of FOLOTYN commencing in the fourth quarter
of 2009. Three distributors affiliated with AmerisourceBergen Corporation accounted for 100% of our net product sales for the year ended December 31, 2009. We anticipate that affiliates of
AmerisourceBergen Corporation will continue to account for substantially all of our net product sales in 2010. We had no sales outside of the United States during the year ended December 31,
2009.

Competition

There are currently no FDA-approved drugs other than FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory
PTCL. However, we are aware of multiple investigational agents that are currently being studied in clinical trials for T-cell lymphoma, including romidepsin and belinostat, which, if
successful, may compete with FOLOTYN in the United States. In addition, there are many existing approaches used in the treatment of relapsed or refractory PTCL, including combination chemotherapy and
single agent regimens, which represent competition for FOLOTYN.

Many
companies of all sizes, including a number of large pharmaceutical companies and several biotechnology companies, are developing product candidates that have disease targets similar
to those we are pursuing. Some of these competitive product candidates are in clinical trials and others are approved. There are products and technologies currently on the market that will compete
directly with FOLOTYN. Universities, governmental agencies and other public and private research organizations
also conduct research and may market commercial products on their own or through joint ventures. These companies and institutions also compete with us in recruiting qualified scientific personnel.
Many of these entities may have:



15

---



Table of Contents



Many
of these companies and organizations have significant experience in preclinical testing, human clinical trials, product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution and other
regulatory approval and commercial procedures. They may also have a greater number of significant patents and greater legal resources to seek remedies for cases of alleged infringement of their
patents by us to block, delay, or compromise our own drug development process.

We
expect technology developments in our industry to continue to occur at a rapid pace. Commercial developments by our competitors may render FOLOTYN obsolete or
non-competitive, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Government Regulation

We operate in a highly regulated industry, which is subject to significant federal, state, local and foreign regulation. Our present
and future business has been, and will continue to be, subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or FDC Act, the Medicaid rebate program, the
Veterans Health Care Act of 1992, and the Occupational Safety and Health Act, among others.

As
a result of these laws and regulations, product development and product approval processes are very expensive and time consuming.



In the U.S., pharmaceutical products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA. The FDC Act and other federal and state statutes
and regulations, govern, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, storage, recordkeeping, approval, labeling, promotion and marketing, distribution,
post-approval monitoring and reporting, sampling, and import and export of pharmaceutical products. Failure to comply with applicable U.S. requirements may subject a company to a variety
of administrative or judicial sanctions, such as FDA refusal to approve pending new drug applications or NDAs, warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of
production or distribution, injunctions, fines, civil penalties, and criminal prosecution.

Pharmaceutical
product development in the U.S. typically involves preclinical laboratory and animal tests, the submission to the FDA of a notice of claimed investigational exemption or
an investigational new drug application or IND, which must become effective before clinical testing may commence, and adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to establish the safety
and effectiveness of the drug for each indication for which FDA approval is sought. Satisfaction of FDA pre-market approval requirements typically takes many years and the actual time
required may vary substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product or disease.

Preclinical
tests include laboratory evaluation, as well as animal trials to assess the characteristics and potential pharmacology and toxicity of the product. The conduct of the
preclinical tests must comply with federal regulations and requirements including good laboratory practices. The results of preclinical testing are submitted to the FDA as part of an IND along with
other information including information about product chemistry, manufacturing and controls and a proposed clinical trial protocol. Long term preclinical tests, such as animal tests of reproductive
toxicity and carcinogenicity, may continue after the IND is submitted.

A
30-day waiting period after the submission of each IND is required prior to the commencement of clinical testing in humans. If the FDA has not objected to the IND within
this 30-day period, the clinical trial proposed in the IND may begin.

16

---



Table of Contents

Clinical
trials involve the administration of the investigational new drug to healthy volunteers or patients under the supervision of a qualified investigator. Clinical trials must be
conducted in compliance with federal regulations, good clinical practices or GCP, as well as under protocols detailing the objectives of the trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and
the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. Each protocol involving testing on U.S. patients and subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND.

The
FDA may order the temporary or permanent discontinuation of a clinical trial at any time or impose other sanctions if it believes that the clinical trial is not being conducted in
accordance with FDA requirements or presents an unacceptable risk to the clinical trial patients. The study protocol and informed consent information for patients in clinical trials must also be
submitted to an institutional review board, or IRB, for approval. An IRB may also require the clinical trial at the site to be halted, either temporarily or permanently, for failure to comply with the
IRB's requirements, or may impose other conditions.

Clinical
trials to support NDAs for marketing approval are typically conducted in three sequential phases, but the phases may overlap. In Phase 1, the initial introduction of the
drug into healthy human subjects or patients, the drug is tested to assess metabolism, pharmacokinetics, pharmacological actions, side effects associated with increasing doses and, if possible, early
evidence on effectiveness. In the case of product candidates for severe or life-threatening diseases such as cancer, the initial human testing is often conducted in patients rather than in
healthy volunteers. Since these patients already have the target disease, these studies may provide initial evidence of efficacy traditionally obtained in Phase 2 trials and thus these trials
are frequently referred to as Phase 1b trials. Additionally, when product candidates can do damage to normal cells, it is not ethical to administer such drugs to healthy patients in a
Phase 1 trial. Phase 2 usually involves trials in a limited patient population to determine the effectiveness of the drug for a particular indication or indications, dosage tolerance and
optimum dosage, and identify common adverse effects and safety risks. If a compound demonstrates evidence of effectiveness and an acceptable safety profile in Phase 2 evaluations,
Phase 3 trials are undertaken to obtain the additional information about clinical efficacy and safety in a larger number of patients, typically at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites,
to permit the FDA to evaluate the overall benefit-risk relationship of the drug and to provide adequate information for the labeling of the drug. After completion of the required clinical
testing, an NDA is prepared and submitted to the FDA. FDA approval of the NDA is required before marketing of the product may begin in the U.S. The NDA must include the results of all preclinical,
clinical and other testing and a compilation of data relating to the product's pharmacology, chemistry, manufacture, and controls.

The
FDA has 60 days from its receipt of an NDA to determine whether the application will be accepted for filing based on the agency's threshold determination that it is
sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review. The FDA has agreed to certain performance goals in the
review of NDAs. Most such applications for non-priority drug products are reviewed within ten months. The review process may be extended by the FDA for three additional months to consider
new information submitted during the review or clarification regarding information already provided in the submission. The FDA may also refer applications for novel drug products or drug products
which present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee, typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts, for review, evaluation and a recommendation as to
whether the application should be approved. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee, but it generally follows such recommendations. Before approving an NDA, the FDA will
typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with GCP. Additionally, the FDA will inspect the facility or the facilities at which the drug is manufactured. The FDA will not
approve the product unless compliance with current good manufacturing practices or cGMPs, is satisfactory and the NDA contains data that provide substantial evidence that the drug is safe and
effective in the indication studied.

17

---



Table of Contents

After the FDA evaluates the NDA and the manufacturing facilities, it issues an approval letter or a complete response letter. An approval letter authorizes
commercial marketing of the drug with specific prescribing information for specific indications. As a condition of NDA approval, the FDA may require substantial post-approval testing and
surveillance to monitor the drug's safety or efficacy and may impose other conditions, including labeling restrictions which can materially affect the potential market and profitability of the drug.
Once granted, product approvals may be withdrawn if compliance with regulatory standards is not maintained or problems are identified following initial marketing.

A
complete response letter outlines the deficiencies in an NDA submission and may require substantial additional testing or information in order for the FDA to reconsider the
application. If and when those deficiencies have been addressed in a resubmission of the NDA, FDA will re-initiate review. If it is satisfied that the deficiencies have been addressed, the
FDA will issue an approval letter. The FDA has committed to reviewing such resubmissions in two or six months depending on the type of information included. It is not unusual for the FDA to issue a
complete response letter because it believes that the drug is not safe enough or effective enough or because it does not believe that the data submitted are reliable or conclusive.



Under the FDA's accelerated approval regulations, the FDA may approve a drug for a serious or life-threatening illness that
provides meaningful therapeutic benefit to patients over existing treatments based upon a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. In clinical trials, a surrogate
endpoint is a measurement of laboratory or clinical signs of a disease or condition that substitutes for a direct measurement of how a patient feels, functions or survives. Surrogate endpoints can
often be measured more easily or more rapidly than clinical endpoints. A drug candidate approved on this basis is subject to rigorous post-marketing compliance requirements, including the
completion of post-approval clinical trials to confirm the effect on the clinical endpoint. Failure to conduct required post-approval studies, or confirm a clinical benefit
during post-approval studies, will allow the FDA to withdraw the drug from the market on an expedited basis. In addition, all promotional materials for drug candidates approved under
accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by the FDA.

FOLOTYN
was approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL under the FDA's accelerated approval regulations. The approval was based on overall response rate from
our PROPEL trial. In connection with the accelerated approval, we are required to conduct several post-approval studies that are intended to verify and describe FOLOTYN's clinical benefit
in patients with T-cell lymphoma and assess whether FOLOTYN poses a serious risk of altered drug levels resulting from organ impairment.



Once an NDA is approved, a product is subject to certain post-approval requirements. For instance, the FDA closely
regulates the post-approval marketing and promotion of drugs, including standards and regulations for direct-to-consumer advertising, off-label
promotion, industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities and promotional activities involving the internet.

Drugs
may be marketed only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved labeling. Changes to some of the conditions established in an approved
application, including changes in indications, labeling, or manufacturing processes or facilities, require submission and FDA approval of a new NDA or NDA supplement before the change can be
implemented. An NDA supplement for a new indication typically requires clinical data similar to that in the original application, and the FDA uses the same procedures and actions in reviewing NDA
supplements as it does in reviewing NDAs. We cannot be certain that the FDA or any other regulatory agency will grant

18

---



Table of Contents

approval
for FOLOTYN for any additional indications or any other product candidate for any indication on a timely basis, if at all.

Adverse
event reporting and submission of periodic reports is required following FDA approval of an NDA. The FDA also may require post-marketing testing, known as
Phase 4 testing, risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, and surveillance to monitor the effects of an approved product or place conditions on an approval that could restrict the
distribution or use of the product. In addition, quality control as well as drug manufacture, packaging, and labeling procedures must continue to conform to current good manufacturing practices, or
cGMPs, after approval. Drug manufacturers and certain of their subcontractors are required to register their establishments with FDA and certain state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced
inspections by the FDA during which the agency inspects manufacturing facilities to access compliance with cGMPs. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the areas
of production and quality control to maintain compliance with cGMPs. Regulatory authorities may withdraw product approvals or request product recalls if a company fails to comply with regulatory
standards, if it encounters problems following initial marketing, or if previously unrecognized problems are subsequently discovered.



Orphan drug designation is granted by the FDA to drugs intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which for this program is defined
as having a prevalence of less than 200,000 individuals in the U.S. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting a marketing application. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation,
the generic identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA.

Orphan
drug designation does not shorten the regulatory review and approval process for an orphan drug, nor does it give that drug any advantage in the regulatory review and approval
process. However, if an orphan drug later receives the first approval for the indication for which it has orphan drug designation, the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same
drug for the same indication, except in very limited circumstances, for seven years in the U.S. Orphan drug exclusivity may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was
materially defective or if
the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantity of the drug. The FDA has granted orphan drug designation to FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with T-cell lymphoma, follicular
lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Upon FDA approval of FOLOTYN for the treatment of relapsed or refractory PTCL, FOLOTYN received seven years of orphan drug exclusivity for this
indication until September 24, 2016.

Although
obtaining approval to market a product with orphan drug exclusivity may be advantageous, we cannot be certain:



In seeking approval for a drug through an NDA, applicants are required to list with the FDA each patent with claims that cover the
applicant's product or FDA approved method of using this product. Upon approval of a drug, each of the patents listed in the application for the drug is then published in the FDA's Approved Drug
Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, commonly known as the Orange Book. Drugs listed in the Orange Book can, in turn, be cited by potential competitors in support of approval of an
abbreviated new drug application, or ANDA. An ANDA provides for

19

---



Table of Contents

marketing
of a drug product that has the same active ingredients in the same strengths and dosage form as the listed drug and has been shown through bioequivalence testing to be therapeutically
equivalent to the listed drug. ANDA applicants are not required to conduct or submit results of pre-clinical or clinical tests to prove the safety or effectiveness of their drug product,
other than the requirement for bioequivalence testing. Drugs approved in this way are commonly referred to as "generic equivalents" to the listed drug, and can often be substituted by pharmacists
under prescriptions written for the original listed drug.

The
ANDA applicant is required to certify to the FDA concerning any patents listed for the approved product in the FDA's Orange Book. Specifically, the applicant must certify that:
(i) the required patent information has not been filed; (ii) the listed patent has expired; (iii) the listed patent has not expired, but will expire on a particular date and
approval is sought after patent expiration; or (iv) the listed patent is invalid or will not be infringed by the new product. A certification that the new product will not infringe the already
approved product's listed patents or that such patents are invalid is called a Paragraph IV certification. If the applicant does not challenge the listed patents, the ANDA application will not
be approved until all the listed patents claiming the referenced product have expired.

If
the ANDA applicant has provided a Paragraph IV certification to the FDA, the applicant must also send notice of the Paragraph IV certification to the NDA and patent
holders once the ANDA has been accepted for filing by the FDA. The NDA and patent holders may then initiate a patent infringement lawsuit in response to the notice of the Paragraph IV
certification. The filing of a patent infringement lawsuit within 45 days of the receipt of a Paragraph IV certification notification automatically prevents the FDA from approving the
ANDA until the earlier of 30 months, expiration of the patent, settlement of the lawsuit or a decision in the infringement case that is favorable to the ANDA applicant. The ANDA application
also will not be approved until any non-patent exclusivity, such as exclusivity for obtaining approval of a new chemical entity, listed in the Orange Book for the referenced product has
expired. Federal law provides a period of five years of exclusivity following approval of a drug containing no previously approved active moiety, during which ANDAs for generic versions of those drugs
cannot be submitted unless the submission contains a Paragraph IV challenge to a listed patent, in which case the submission may be made four years following the original product approval.
Federal law also provides for a period of three years of exclusivity following approval of a listed drug that contains previously approved active ingredients that is approved in a new dosage form,
route of administration or combination, or for a new use, the approval of which was required to be supported by new clinical trials conducted by or for the sponsor, during which the FDA cannot grant
effective approval of an ANDA based on that listed drug.



The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, to which we are subject, prohibits corporations and individuals from engaging in certain
activities to obtain or retain business or to influence a person working in an official capacity. It is illegal to pay, offer to pay or authorize the payment of anything of value to any foreign
government official, government staff member, political party or political candidate in an attempt to obtain or retain business or to otherwise influence a person working in an official capacity.



In addition to FDA restrictions on marketing of pharmaceutical products, several other types of state and federal laws have been
applied to restrict certain marketing practices in the pharmaceutical and medical device industries in recent years. These laws include antikickback statutes and false claims statutes.

20

---



Table of Contents

The
federal health care program antikickback statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving remuneration to induce or in return
for purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for the purchase, lease, or order of any health care item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or other federally financed healthcare
programs. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on one hand and prescribers, purchasers, and formulary managers on the other. Although there
are a number of statutory exemptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution, the exemptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that involve
remuneration intended to induce prescribing, purchases, or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exemption or safe harbor. Our practices may not in all cases meet
all of the criteria for safe harbor protection from antikickback liability.

Federal
false claims laws prohibit any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false claim for payment to the federal government, or knowingly making, or causing
to be made, a false statement to get a false claim paid. Recently, several pharmaceutical and other health care companies have been prosecuted under these laws for allegedly providing free product to
customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal programs for the product. Other companies have been prosecuted for causing false claims to be submitted because of the company's
marketing of the product for unapproved, and thus non-reimbursable, uses. The majority of states also have statutes or regulations similar to the federal antikickback law and false claims
laws, which apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payer. Sanctions under these federal and state laws may
include civil monetary penalties, exclusion of a manufacturer's products from reimbursement under government programs, criminal fines, and imprisonment.

Because
of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the safe harbors, it is possible that some of our business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such
laws. Such a challenge could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In
addition, as part of the sales and marketing process, pharmaceutical companies frequently provide samples of approved drugs to physicians. This practice is regulated by the FDA and
other governmental authorities, including, in particular, requirements concerning record keeping and control procedures. Any failure to comply with the regulations may result in significant criminal
and civil penalties as well as damage to our credibility in the marketplace.



Outside the United States, our ability to market FOLOTYN is contingent upon receiving marketing authorization from the appropriate
regulatory authorities. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, marketing authorization, pricing and reimbursement vary widely from country to country. At present, foreign marketing
authorizations are applied for at a national level, although within the European Union, or EU, centralized registration procedures are available to companies wishing to market a product in more than
one EU member state. If the regulatory authority is satisfied that adequate evidence of safety, quality and efficacy has been presented, a marketing authorization will be granted. In some countries in
the EU, pricing of prescription drugs is subject to government control and agreements must be reached on a national level before marketing may begin in that country. If we are unable to reach
agreement on an acceptable price for our products, we may choose not to pursue marketing of FOLOTYN in that country. The foreign regulatory approval process involves all of the risks associated with
FDA approval discussed above.

Similar
to the United States, a system for orphan drug designation exists in the E.U. FOLOTYN received orphan medicinal product designation by the European Committee for Orphan Medicinal

21

---



Table of Contents

Products.
Orphan designation does not shorten the regulatory review and approval process for an orphan drug, nor does it give that drug any advantage in the regulatory review and approval process.
However, if an orphan drug later receives approval for the indication for which it has designation, the relevant regulatory authority may not approve any other applications to market the same drug for
the same indication, except in very limited circumstances, for 10 years in the E.U.

Other Regulations

We are also subject to numerous federal, state and local laws relating to such matters as safe working conditions, manufacturing
practices, environmental protection, fire hazard
control, and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances. We may incur significant costs to comply with such laws and regulations now or in the future.

Results of Operations

Please see financial statements and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," included
in this report for a discussion of financial information about our business segment and our expenses on research and development.

Employees

As of February 25, 2010, we had a total of 170 full-time employees. No employee is represented by a labor union.

Other Information

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on
Form 8-K, as well as any amendments to those reports, are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with, or furnish them to,
the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Once atwww.allos.com, go to Investors/Financial Reports to locate copies of such reports. You may also
read and copy materials that we file with SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference
Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website atwww.sec.govthat contains reports,
proxy and information statements and other information regarding us and other issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

22

---





Table of Contents

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Our business faces significant risks. These risks include those described below and may include additional
risks of which we are not currently aware or that we currently do not believe are material. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risk factors actually occurs, they may
materially harm our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow. As a result, the market price of our common stock could decline. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not yet
identified or that we think are immaterial may also materially harm our business, operating results and financial condition. The following risks should be read in conjunction with the other
information set forth in this report.

We have a history of net losses and an accumulated deficit, and we may never generate sufficient revenue to achieve or maintain profitability in the future.

We have experienced significant net losses and negative cash flows from operations. To date, we have financed our operations primarily
through the public and private sale of securities. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we had net losses of $73.6 million, $51.7 million and
$39.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, we an accumulated deficit of $373.2 million. We have incurred these losses principally from costs incurred in our research
and development programs and from our selling, general and administrative expenses.

On
September 24, 2009, we obtained accelerated approval from the FDA for FOLOTYN for use as a single agent for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. Our
ability to generate revenue and achieve profitability is dependent on our ability, alone or with partners, to successfully commercialize FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or
refractory PTCL. We are also developing FOLOTYN for use as a single agent and in combination therapy regimens in a range of hematologic malignancies and solid tumor indications, which may or may not
lead to obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals to market FOLOTYN for additional indications. We expect to continue to spend substantial amounts on research and development, including amounts
spent on conducting clinical trials and seeking additional regulatory approvals for FOLOTYN, and commercializing FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. As a result, we
may never generate sufficient revenue from product sales to become profitable or generate positive cash flows.

Our near-term prospects are dependent on FOLOTYN. If we are unable to successfully commercialize FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or
refractory PTCL, our ability to generate significant revenue or achieve profitability will be adversely affected.

FOLOTYN is our only product approved for marketing by the FDA and our ability to generate revenue in the near term is entirely
dependent upon sales of FOLOTYN. We may not be able to successfully commercialize FOLOTYN for a number of reasons, including:



23

---



Table of Contents



If
we are unable to successfully commercialize pralatrexate for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL, our ability to generate revenue from product sales to achieve
profitability will be adversely affected and our stock price would likely decline.

Our operating results are unpredictable and may fluctuate. If our operating results are below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, the trading price of our
stock could decline.

Our operating results are difficult to predict and will likely fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year. Due to the recent
approval of FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients for relapsed or refractory PTCL in the United States and the lack of historical sales data, FOLOTYN sales will be difficult to predict from period to
period. We believe that our quarterly and annual results of operations may be negatively affected by a variety of factors, including:



In
addition, we measure compensation cost for stock-based awards made to employees at the grant date of the award, based on the fair value of the award, and recognize the cost as an
expense over the employee's requisite service period. As the variables that we use as a basis for valuing these awards change over time, including our underlying stock price, the magnitude of the
expense that we must recognize may vary significantly. Any such variance from one period to the next could cause a significant fluctuation in our operating results.

For
these reasons, it is difficult for us to accurately forecast future profits or losses. As a result, it is possible that in some quarters our operating results could be below the
expectations of securities analysts or investors, which could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline, perhaps substantially.

If we are unable to maintain adequate sales, marketing or distribution capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to perform some of these functions, we will
not be able to commercialize FOLOTYN effectively.

The approval of FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL is our first U.S. indication. Accordingly, we
have limited experience in sales, marketing and distribution of pharmaceutical products. We may not be able to adequately maintain the necessary sales, marketing, supply chain management and
reimbursement capabilities on our own or enter into arrangements with third parties to perform these functions in a timely manner or on acceptable terms. Additionally, maintaining sales, marketing and
distribution capabilities may be more expensive than we anticipate,

24

---



Table of Contents

requiring
us to divert capital from other intended purposes or preventing us from building our sales, marketing and distribution capabilities to the desired levels. To be successful we
must:



The
commercialization of FOLOTYN requires us to manage relationships with an increasing number of collaborative partners, suppliers and third-party contractors. If we are unable to
successfully establish and maintain the required infrastructure, either internally or through third parties, and successfully manage an increasing number of relationships, we will have difficulty
growing our business. In addition, we intend to enter into co-promotion or out-licensing arrangements with other pharmaceutical or biotechnology partners where necessary to
reach foreign market segments and when deemed strategically and economically advisable. To the extent that we enter into co-promotion or other licensing arrangements, our product revenues
are likely to be lower than if we directly marketed and sold FOLOTYN, and some or all of the revenues we receive will depend upon the efforts of third parties, which may not be successful. If we are
unable to develop and maintain adequate sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, independently or with others, we may not be able to generate significant product revenue or become profitable.

Even though we have obtained accelerated approval to market FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL, we are subject to ongoing regulatory
obligations and review, including post-approval requirements.

FOLOTYN was approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL under the FDA's accelerated approval program, which
allows the FDA to approve products for cancer or other life threatening diseases based on initial positive clinical data. Under these provisions, we are subject to certain post-approval
requirements pursuant to which we have agreed to conduct two randomized Phase 3 trials to verify and describe FOLOTYN's clinical benefit in patients with T-cell lymphoma. The FDA
has also required that we conduct two Phase 1 trials to assess whether FOLOTYN poses a serious risk of altered drug levels resulting from organ impairment. Failure to complete the studies or
adhere to the timelines established by the FDA could result in penalties, including fines or withdrawal of FOLOTYN from the market. The FDA may also initiate proceedings to withdraw approval if our
Phase 3 studies fail to verify clinical benefit. Further, the FDA may require us to strengthen the warnings and precautions section of the FOLOTYN package insert based on the results of the
Phase 1 studies. We are also subject to additional, continuing post-approval regulatory obligations, including the possibility of additional clinical studies required by the FDA,
safety reporting requirements and regulatory oversight of the promotion and marketing of FOLOTYN.

In
addition, we or our third-party manufacturers are required to adhere to regulations setting forth the FDA's current Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP. These regulations cover all
aspects of the manufacturing, storage, testing, quality control and record keeping relating to FOLOTYN. Furthermore, we or our third-party manufacturers are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA
and foreign regulatory authorities to ensure strict compliance with cGMP or other applicable government regulations and corresponding foreign standards. We do not have control over a third-party
manufacturer's compliance with these regulations and standards. If we or our third-party manufacturers fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, we may be subject to fines, suspension,
modification or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution.

25

---



Table of Contents

The status of coverage and reimbursement from third-party payers for newly approved health care drugs is uncertain and failure to obtain adequate coverage and reimbursement
could limit our ability to generate revenue.

Our ability to successfully commercialize FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or for other future
indications will depend, in part, on the extent to which coverage and reimbursement for FOLOTYN is available from government and health administration authorities, private health insurers, managed
care programs and other third-party payers. Significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement of newly approved health care products.

Healthcare
providers and third-party payers use coding systems to identify diagnoses, procedures, services, drugs, pharmaceutical devices, equipment and other health-related items and
services. Proper coding is an integral component to receiving appropriate reimbursement for the administration of FOLOTYN and related services. The majority of payers use nationally recognized code
sets to report medical conditions, services and drugs. Although we are in the process of applying for permanent reimbursement codes for FOLOTYN, healthcare providers prescribing FOLOTYN will initially
be required to submit claims for reimbursement using temporary miscellaneous codes, which may result in payment delays or incorrect payment levels. We are also in the process of applying for
transitional pass-through status which would enable FOLOTYN to be reimbursed under the hospital outpatient prospective payment system. We cannot predict at this time whether our customers
will receive adequate reimbursement for FOLOTYN, nor can we predict whether FOLOTYN will receive permanent reimbursement codes or transitional pass-through status in the future.

Third-party
payers, including Medicare, are challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. Government and other third-party payers increasingly are attempting to
contain health care costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement for new drugs and by refusing, in some cases, to provide coverage for uses of approved products for disease
conditions for which the FDA has not granted labeling approval. Third-party insurance coverage may not be available to patients for
FOLOTYN. If government and other third-party payers do not provide adequate coverage and reimbursement levels for FOLOTYN, FOLOTYN's market acceptance may be adversely affected.

We are dependent upon a small number of customers for a significant portion of our revenue, and the loss of, or significant reduction or cancellation in sales to, any one of
these customers could adversely affect our operations and financial condition.

In the United States, we sell FOLOTYN to a small number of distributors who in turn sell-through to patient health care
providers. These distributors also provide multiple logistics services relating to the distribution of FOLOTYN, including transportation, warehousing, cross-docking, inventory management, packaging
and freight-forwarding. We do not promote FOLOTYN to these distributors and they do not set or determine demand for FOLOTYN. For the year ended December 31, 2009, three companies affiliated
with AmerisourceBergen Corporation accounted for 100% of our FOLOTYN sales. We expect significant customer concentration to continue for the foreseeable future. Our ability to successfully
commercialize FOLOTYN will depend, in part, on the extent to which these distributors are able to provide adequate distribution of FOLOTYN to patient health care providers. Although we believe we can
find alternative distributors on a relatively short notice, our revenue during that period of time may suffer and we may incur additional costs to replace a distributor. The loss of any large
customer, a significant reduction in sales we make to them, any cancellation of orders they have made with us or any failure to pay for the products we have shipped to them could materially and
adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

26

---



Table of Contents

If the distributors that we rely upon to sell FOLOTYN fail to perform, our business may be adversely affected.

Our success depends on the continued customer support efforts of our network of distributors. The use of distributors involves certain
risks, including, but not limited to, risks that these distributors will:



Any
such failure may result in decreased sales of FOLOTYN, which would harm our business.

If we fail to comply with healthcare fraud and abuse laws, we could face substantial penalties and our business, operations and financial condition could be adversely
affected.

As a biopharmaceutical company, even though we do not and will not control referrals of health care services or bill directly to
Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payers, certain federal and state healthcare laws and regulations pertaining to fraud and abuse will be applicable to our business. These laws and regulations,
include, among others:



Although
there are a number of statutory exemptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution under the federal Anti-Kickback statute,
the exemptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that involve remuneration intended to induce prescriptions, purchases or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not
qualify for an exemption or safe harbor. Our practices may not in all cases meet all of the criteria for safe harbor protection from anti-kickback liability.

27

---



Table of Contents

Although
physicians are permitted to, based on their medical judgment, prescribe products for indications other than those cleared or approved by the FDA, manufacturers are prohibited
from promoting their products for such off-label uses. We market FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL and provide promotional materials and training
programs to physicians regarding the use of FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. Although we believe our marketing, promotional materials and training programs for
physicians do not constitute off-label promotion of FOLOTYN, the FDA may disagree. If the FDA determines that our promotional materials, training or other activities constitute
off-label promotion of FOLOTYN, it could request that we modify our training or promotional materials or other activities or subject us to regulatory enforcement actions, including the
issuance of a warning letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine and criminal penalties. It is also possible that other federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might take action if they believe
that the alleged improper promotion led to the submission and payment of claims for an unapproved use, which could result in significant fines or penalties under other statutory authorities, such as
laws prohibiting false claims for reimbursement. Even if it is later determined we are not in violation of these laws, we may be faced with negative publicity, incur significant expenses defending our
position and have to divert significant management resources from other matters.

In
recent years, several states and localities, including California, the District of Columbia, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, Vermont, and West Virginia, have enacted
legislation requiring pharmaceutical companies to establish marketing compliance programs, and file periodic reports with the state or make periodic public disclosures on sales, marketing, pricing,
clinical trials, and other activities. Similar legislation is being considered in other states. Many of these requirements are new and uncertain, and the penalties for failure to comply with these
requirements are unclear. Nonetheless, if we are found not to be in full compliance with these laws, we could face enforcement action and fines and other penalties, and could receive adverse
publicity.

If
our operations are found to be in violation of any of the healthcare fraud and abuse laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to
penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Any penalties, damages, fines, curtailment or restructuring of our operations
could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results. Although compliance programs can mitigate the risk of investigation and prosecution for violations of these laws,
the risks cannot be entirely eliminated. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our
management's attention from the operation of our business. Moreover, achieving and sustaining compliance with all applicable federal and state fraud and abuse laws may be costly.

If our competitors develop and market products that are more effective than FOLOTYN, our commercial opportunity will be reduced or eliminated.

Even though we have obtained approval to market FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL, our commercial
opportunity will be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and market products that are more effective, have fewer side effects or are less expensive than FOLOTYN for this or any other
potential indication. Our potential competitors include large, fully-integrated pharmaceutical companies and more established biotechnology companies, both of which have significant resources and
expertise in research and development, manufacturing, testing, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing. Academic institutions, government agencies, and other public and private research
organizations conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and marketing. It is possible that competitors will succeed in
developing technologies that are more effective than those being developed by us or that would render our technology obsolete or noncompetitive.

28

---



Table of Contents

We cannot predict when or if we will obtain regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN in the United States for any additional indications or in any other countries.

We are subject to stringent regulations with respect to product safety and efficacy by various international, federal, state and local
authorities. FOLOTYN has not been approved for marketing in the United States for any indication other than the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. In addition, FOLOTYN has not
been approved for marketing for this or any other indication in any other country. A pharmaceutical product cannot be marketed in the United States or most other countries until it has completed a
rigorous and extensive regulatory review and approval process. Satisfaction of regulatory requirements typically takes many years, is dependent upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product and
requires the expenditure of substantial resources. Of particular significance are the requirements covering research and development, preclinical and clinical testing, manufacturing, quality control,
labeling and promotion of drugs for human use. We may not obtain the necessary regulatory approvals to market FOLOTYN in the United States for any additional indications or in any other countries. If
we fail to obtain or maintain regulatory approvals to market FOLOTYN in the United States for any additional indications or in any other countries, our ability to generate significant revenue or
achieve profitability may be adversely affected.

Reports of adverse events or safety concerns involving FOLOTYN or in related technology fields or other companies' clinical trials of similar small molecule chemotherapeutic
agents could delay or prevent us from obtaining or maintaining regulatory approval or negatively impact public perception of FOLOTYN.

FOLOTYN may produce serious adverse events. These adverse events could interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials of FOLOTYN, including
the FDA-required post-approval studies, and could result in the FDA or other regulatory authorities denying or withdrawing approval of FOLOTYN for any or all indications,
including for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. An independent data safety monitoring board, the FDA, other regulatory authorities or we may suspend or terminate clinical
trials at any time. We cannot assure you that FOLOTYN will be safe for human use.

At
present, there are a number of clinical trials being conducted by other pharmaceutical companies involving small molecule chemotherapeutic agents. If other pharmaceutical companies
announce that they observed frequent adverse events or unknown safety issues in their trials involving compounds similar to, or competitive with, FOLOTYN, we could encounter delays in the timing of
our clinical trials or difficulties in obtaining or maintaining the necessary regulatory approvals for FOLOTYN. In addition, the public perception of FOLOTYN might be adversely affected, which could
harm our business and results of operations and cause the market price of our common stock to decline, even if the concern relates to another company's product or product candidate.

If FOLOTYN fails to meet safety or efficacy endpoints in clinical trials for additional indications, it will not receive regulatory approval and we will be unable to market
FOLOTYN for those indications studied.

We have ongoing clinical trials involving FOLOTYN and plan to initiate additional trials to evaluate FOLOTYN's potential clinical
utility in other hematologic malignancies and solid tumor indications. FOLOTYN may not prove to be safe and efficacious in clinical trials for other indications and may not meet all of the applicable
regulatory requirements needed to receive regulatory approval for those indications. The clinical development and regulatory approval process is expensive and takes many years. Failure can occur at
any stage of development, and the timing of any regulatory approval cannot be accurately predicted. In addition, failure to comply with the FDA and other applicable U.S. and foreign regulatory
requirements applicable to clinical trials may subject us to administrative or judicially imposed sanctions.

29

---



Table of Contents

As part of the regulatory approval process, we must conduct clinical trials for FOLOTYN and any other product candidate to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the
satisfaction of the FDA and other regulatory authorities abroad. The number and design of clinical trials that will be required varies depending on the product candidate, the condition being
evaluated, the trial results and regulations applicable to any particular product candidate. The designs of our clinical trials for FOLOTYN are based on many assumptions about the expected effect of
FOLOTYN, and if those assumptions prove incorrect, the clinical trials may not demonstrate the safety or efficacy of FOLOTYN. Preliminary results may not be confirmed upon full analysis of the
detailed results of a trial, and prior clinical trial program designs and results may not be predictive of future clinical trial designs or results. Product candidates in later stage clinical trials
may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy despite having progressed through initial clinical trials with acceptable endpoints. For example, we terminated the development of EFAPROXYN, one of
our former product candidates, when it failed to demonstrate statistically significant improvement in overall survival in the targeted patients in a Phase 3 clinical trial. If FOLOTYN fails to
show clinically significant benefits in any clinical trial or for any particular indication, it may not be approved for marketing for such indication. Additionally, if FOLOTYN is demonstrated to be
unsafe in clinical trials for other indications, such demonstration could negatively impact FOLOTYN's existing approval for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL.

Even
if we achieve positive interim results in clinical trials, these results do not necessarily predict final results, and acceptable results in early trials may not be repeated in
later trials. Data obtained from preclinical and clinical activities are susceptible to varying interpretations that could delay, limit or prevent regulatory clearances, and the FDA can request that
we conduct additional clinical trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after promising results in earlier
trials. In addition, negative or inconclusive results
or adverse safety events during a clinical trial could cause a clinical trial to be repeated or terminated. Also, failure to construct clinical trial protocols to screen patients for risk profile
factors relevant to the trial for purposes of segregating patients into the patient populations treated with the drug being tested and the control group could result in either group experiencing a
disproportionate number of adverse events and could cause a clinical trial to be repeated or terminated. If we have to conduct additional clinical trials for FOLOTYN for any particular indication, it
will significantly increase our expenses and may delay marketing of FOLOTYN for such indication.

Even if FOLOTYN meets safety and efficacy endpoints in clinical trials for additional indications, regulatory authorities may not approve FOLOTYN, or we may face
post-approval problems that require withdrawal of FOLOTYN from the market.

We will not be able to market FOLOTYN in the United States for any additional indications or in any other countries for any indications
until we have obtained the necessary regulatory approvals. Our receipt of approval of FOLOTYN in the United States for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL does not guarantee
that we will obtain regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN in the United States for any additional indications or in any other countries. We have limited experience in filing and pursuing applications
necessary to gain regulatory approvals, which may place us at risk of delays, overspending and human resources inefficiencies.

FOLOTYN
may not be approved for any additional indications even if it achieves its endpoints in clinical trials. Regulatory agencies, including the FDA, or their advisors, may disagree
with our interpretations of data from preclinical studies and clinical trials. The FDA has substantial discretion in the approval process, and when or whether regulatory approval will be obtained for
any drug we develop. Regulatory agencies also may approve a product candidate for fewer conditions than requested or may grant approval subject to the performance of post-approval studies
or risk evaluation and mitigation strategies for a product candidate. In addition, regulatory agencies may not approve the labeling claims that are necessary or desirable for the successful
commercialization of FOLOTYN.

30

---



Table of Contents

Following
regulatory approval for any additional indication, FOLOTYN may later produce adverse events that limit or prevent its widespread use or that force us to withdraw FOLOTYN from
the market for that indication or other indications. In addition, a marketed product continues to be subject to strict regulation after approval and may be required to undergo
post-approval studies. For example, we are required to conduct two randomized Phase 3 trials to verify and describe FOLOTYN's clinical benefit in patients with T-cell
lymphoma as well as two Phase 1 trials to assess whether FOLOTYN poses a serious risk of altered drug levels resulting from organ impairment. Any unforeseen problems with an approved product,
any failure to meet the
post-approval study requirements or any violation of regulations could result in restrictions on the product, including its withdrawal from the market. Any delay in or failure to obtain or
maintain regulatory approvals for FOLOTYN in the United States for any additional indication or in any other countries could harm our business and prevent us from ever generating significant revenues
or achieving profitability.

We may experience delays in our clinical trials that could adversely affect our financial position and our commercial prospects.

We do not know when our current clinical trials will be completed, if at all. We also cannot accurately predict when other planned
clinical trials will begin or be completed. Many factors affect patient enrollment, including the size of the patient population, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria
for the trial, competing clinical trials and new drugs approved for the conditions we are investigating. Other companies are conducting clinical trials and have announced plans for future trials that
are seeking or likely to seek patients with the same diseases as those we are studying. Competition for patients in some cancer trials is particularly intense because of the limited number of leading
specialist physicians and the geographic concentration of major clinical centers.

As
a result of the numerous factors that can affect the pace of progress of clinical trials, our trials may take longer to enroll patients than we anticipate, if they can be completed at
all. Delays in patient enrollment in the trials may increase our costs and slow our product development and approval process. Our product development costs will also increase if we need to perform
more or larger clinical trials than planned. If other companies' product candidates show favorable results, we may be required to conduct additional clinical trials to address changes in treatment
regimens or for our products to be commercially competitive. Any delays in completing our clinical trials will delay our ability to obtain regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN in the United States
for any additional indications or in any other countries, which may adversely affect our ability to generate significant revenues or achieve profitability.

We may be required to suspend, repeat or terminate our clinical trials if they are not conducted in accordance with regulatory requirements, the results are negative or
inconclusive or the trials are not well designed.

Clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with the FDA's current Good Clinical Practices, or cGMP, or other applicable foreign
government guidelines and are subject to oversight by the FDA, other foreign governmental agencies and Institutional Review Boards at the medical institutions where the clinical trials are conducted.
In addition, clinical trials must be conducted with product candidates produced under cGMP and may require large numbers of test subjects. Clinical trials may be suspended by the FDA, other foreign
governmental agencies, or us for various reasons, including:



31

---



Table of Contents



In
addition, changes in regulatory requirements and guidance may occur and we may need to amend clinical trial protocols to reflect these changes. Amendments may require us to resubmit
our clinical trial protocols to Institutional Review Boards for reexamination, which may impact the costs, timing or successful completion of a clinical trial. Due to these and other factors, FOLOTYN
could take a significantly longer time to gain regulatory approval for any additional indications than we expect or we may never gain approval for additional indications, which could reduce our
revenue by delaying or terminating the commercialization of FOLOTYN for additional indications.

Due to our reliance on contract research organizations and other third parties to conduct our clinical trials, we are unable to directly control the timing, conduct and
expense of our clinical trials.

We rely primarily on third parties to conduct our clinical trials. As a result, we have had and will continue to have less control over
the conduct of our clinical trials, the timing and completion of the trials, the required reporting of adverse events and the management of data developed through the trial than would be the case if
we were relying entirely upon our own staff. Communicating with outside parties can also be challenging, potentially leading to mistakes as well as difficulties in coordinating activities. Outside
parties may have staffing difficulties, may undergo changes in priorities or may become financially distressed, any of which may adversely affect their willingness or ability to conduct our trials. We
may experience unexpected cost increases that are beyond our control. Problems with the timeliness or quality of the work of a contract research organization may lead us to seek to terminate the
relationship and use an alternative service provider. However, making this change may be costly and may delay our trials, and contractual restrictions may make such a change difficult or impossible.
Additionally, it may be impossible to find a replacement organization that can conduct our trials in an acceptable manner and at an acceptable cost.

We may need to raise additional capital to support our future operations. If we fail to obtain the capital necessary to fund our operations, we will be unable to
successfully develop or commercialize FOLOTYN.

Based upon the current status of our product development and commercialization plans, we believe that our cash, cash equivalents, and
investments in marketable securities as of December 31, 2009 should be adequate to support our operations through at least the next 12 months, although there can be no assurance that
this can, in fact, be accomplished. We anticipate continuing our current development programs and beginning other long-term development projects involving FOLOTYN, including the
post-approval clinical studies required for FOLOTYN. These projects may require many years and substantial expenditures to complete and may ultimately be unsuccessful. In addition, we
expect to incur significant costs relating
to the commercialization of FOLOTYN, including costs related to our sales and marketing, medical affairs and manufacturing operations. Therefore, we may need to raise additional capital to support our
future operations. Our actual capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:



32

---



Table of Contents



We
may seek to obtain this additional capital through equity or debt financings, arrangements with corporate partners, or from other sources. Such financings or arrangements, if
successfully consummated, may be dilutive to our existing stockholders. However, there is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed, or that, if available, we will obtain
such financing on terms that are favorable to our stockholders or us. In the event that additional funds are obtained through arrangements with collaborative partners or other sources, such
arrangements may require us to relinquish rights to some of our technologies, product candidates or products under development, which we might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize ourselves, on
terms that are less favorable than might otherwise be available. If we are unable to generate meaningful amounts of revenue from future product sales or cannot otherwise raise sufficient additional
funds to support our operations, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more of our development programs and our business and future prospects for revenue and
profitability may be harmed.

Budget constraints may force us to delay our efforts to develop FOLOTYN for additional indications while we complete the post-approval clinical studies required
by the FDA, which may prevent us from commercializing FOLOTYN for all desired indications as quickly as possible.

Because we have limited resources, and because research and development is an expensive process, we must regularly assess the most
efficient allocation of our research and development budget. In particular, our approval of FOLOTYN in patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL is conditioned upon us undertaking two additional
Phase 3 studies and two additional Phase 1 studies which will result in significant additional expense. As a result of our limited resources, we may have to prioritize the development of
FOLOTYN for additional indications and may not be able to fully realize the value of FOLOTYN for other indications in a timely manner, if at all.

We do not have manufacturing facilities or capabilities and are dependent on third parties to fulfill our manufacturing needs, which could result in the delay of clinical
trials, regulatory approvals, product introductions and commercial sales.

We are dependent on third parties for the manufacture and storage of FOLOTYN for clinical trials and for commercial sale. If we are
unable to contract for a sufficient supply of FOLOTYN on acceptable terms, or if we encounter delays or difficulties in the manufacturing process or our relationships with our manufacturers, we may
not have sufficient product to conduct or complete our clinical trials or support commercial requirements for FOLOTYN.

FOLOTYN
is cytotoxic, which requires the manufacturers of FOLOTYN to have specialized equipment and safety systems to handle such a substance. In addition, the starting materials for

33

---



Table of Contents

FOLOTYN
require custom preparations, which require us to manage an additional set of suppliers to obtain the needed supplies of FOLOTYN.

We
have entered into arrangements with one third-party manufacturer to produce FOLOTYN bulk drug substance and two third-party manufacturers to produce FOLOTYN formulated drug product.
We believe these third-party manufacturers have the capability to meet our projected clinical trial and commercial requirements for FOLOTYN although we cannot assure you of this. In addition, we are
in the process of establishing additional supply agreements for the commercial production of FOLOTYN bulk drug substance and formulated drug product. However, given our current lack of formal supply
agreements and the fact that in many cases our components are supplied by a single source, our third party manufacturers may not be able to fulfill our potential commercial needs or meet our
deadlines, or the components they supply to us may not meet our specifications and quality policies and procedures. If we need to find an alternative supplier of FOLOTYN or its components, we may not
be able to contract for those components on acceptable terms, if at all. Any such failure to supply or delay caused by such suppliers would have an adverse effect on our ability to continue clinical
development of FOLOTYN or commercialize FOLOTYN.

Our
current or future manufacturers may be unable to accurately and reliably manufacture commercial quantities of FOLOTYN at reasonable costs, on a timely basis and in compliance with
the FDA's cGMP. If our current or future contract manufacturers fail in any of these respects, our ability to timely complete our clinical trials, obtain or maintain required regulatory approvals and
successfully commercialize FOLOTYN may be materially and adversely affected. This risk may be heightened with respect to FOLOTYN as there are a limited number of manufacturers with the ability to
handle cytotoxic products such as FOLOTYN. Our reliance on contract manufacturers exposes us to additional risks, including:



Any
of these factors could result in the delay of clinical trials, regulatory submissions, required approvals or commercialization of FOLOTYN. They could also entail higher costs and
result in our being unable to effectively commercialize FOLOTYN.

34

---



Table of Contents

If we are unable to effectively protect our intellectual property, we will be unable to prevent third parties from using our technology, which would impair our
competitiveness and ability to commercialize FOLOTYN. In addition, enforcing our proprietary rights may be expensive and result in increased losses.

Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain meaningful patent protection for FOLOTYN, both in the United
States and in other countries. We rely on patents to protect a large part of our intellectual property and our competitive position. Any patents
issued to or licensed by us could be challenged, invalidated, infringed, circumvented or held unenforceable, based on, among other things, obviousness, inequitable conduct, anticipation or enablement.
In addition, it is possible that no patents will issue on any of our licensed patent applications. It is possible that the claims in patents that have been issued or licensed to us or that may be
issued or licensed to us in the future will not be sufficiently broad to protect our intellectual property or that the patents will not provide protection against competitive products or otherwise be
commercially valuable. Failure to obtain and maintain adequate patent protection for our intellectual property would impair our ability to be commercially competitive.

Our
commercial success will also depend in part on our ability to commercialize FOLOTYN without infringing patents or other proprietary rights of others or breaching the licenses granted
to us. We may not be able to obtain a license to third-party technology that we may require to conduct our business or, if obtainable, we may not be able to license such technology at a reasonable
cost. If we fail to obtain a license to any technology that we may require to commercialize FOLOTYN, or fail to obtain a license at a reasonable cost, we will be unable to commercialize FOLOTYN or to
commercialize it at a price that will allow us to become profitable.

In
addition to patent protection, we also rely upon trade secrets, proprietary know-how and technological advances that we seek to protect through confidentiality agreements
with our collaborators, employees, advisors and consultants. Our employees and consultants are required to enter into confidentiality agreements with us. We also enter into non-disclosure
agreements with our collaborators and vendors, which agreements are intended to protect our confidential information delivered to third parties for research and other purposes. However, these
agreements could be breached and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach, or our trade secrets and proprietary know-how could otherwise become known or be independently discovered
by others.

Furthermore,
as with any pharmaceutical company, our patent and other proprietary rights are subject to uncertainty. Our patent rights related to FOLOTYN might conflict with current or
future patents and other proprietary rights of others. For the same reasons, the products of others could infringe our patents or other proprietary rights. Litigation or patent interference
proceedings, either of which could result in substantial costs to us, may be necessary to enforce any of our patents or other proprietary rights, or to determine the scope and validity or
enforceability of other parties' proprietary rights. We may be dependent on third parties, including our licensors, for cooperation and information that may be required in connection with the defense
and prosecution of our patents and other proprietary rights. The defense and prosecution of patent and intellectual property infringement claims are both costly and time consuming, even if the outcome
is favorable to us. Any adverse outcome could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, require disputed rights to be licensed from third parties, or require us to cease selling our
future products. We are not currently a party to any patent or other intellectual property infringement claims.

We may explore strategic partnerships that may never materialize or may fail.

We may, in the future, periodically explore a variety of possible strategic partnerships in an effort to gain access to additional
product candidates or resources. At the current time, we cannot predict what form such a strategic partnership might take. We are likely to face significant competition in seeking appropriate
strategic partners, and these strategic partnerships can be complicated and time

35

---



Table of Contents

consuming
to negotiate and document. We may not be able to negotiate strategic partnerships on acceptable terms, or at all. We are unable to predict when, if ever, we will enter into any additional
strategic partnerships because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with establishing strategic partnerships.

If we enter into one or more strategic partnerships, we may be required to relinquish important rights to and control over the development of FOLOTYN or otherwise be subject
to unfavorable terms.

Any future strategic partnerships we enter into could subject us to a number of risks, including:



36

---







Table of Contents

Health care reform measures could adversely affect our business.

The business and financial condition of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are affected by the efforts of governmental and
third-party payers to contain or reduce the costs of health care. In the United States and in foreign jurisdictions there have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, a number of
legislative and regulatory proposals aimed at changing the health care system. For example, in some countries other than the United States, pricing of prescription drugs is subject to government
control, and we expect proposals to implement similar controls in the United States to continue. Further, broad health care reform proposals are currently being considered by the U.S. Congress. We are
unable to predict what additional legislation or regulation, if any, relating to the health care industry or third-party coverage and reimbursement may be enacted in the future or what effect such
legislation or regulation would have on our business. The pendency or approval of such proposals or reforms could result in a decrease in our stock price or limit our ability to raise capital or to
obtain strategic partnerships or licenses.

We may not obtain orphan drug exclusivity or we may not receive the full benefit of orphan drug exclusivity even if we obtain such exclusivity.

The FDA has awarded orphan drug status to pralatrexate, which we market under the tradename FOLOTYN, for the treatment of patients with
T-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the first company to receive FDA approval for pralatrexate for the designated
orphan drug indication will obtain seven years of marketing exclusivity during which the FDA may not approve another company's application for pralatrexate for the same orphan indication. Because the
FDA approved FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL, we expect to receive seven years of marketing exclusivity for that indication. Orphan drug exclusivity would not
prevent FDA approval of a different drug for the orphan indication or the same drug for a different indication. In addition, the FDA may void orphan drug exclusivity under certain circumstances.

If product liability lawsuits are successfully brought against us, we may incur substantial liabilities and may be required to limit commercialization of FOLOTYN.

The testing and marketing of pharmaceutical products entail an inherent risk of product liability. Product liability claims might be
brought against us by consumers or health care providers or by pharmaceutical companies or others selling FOLOTYN or any future products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against such
claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit the commercialization of FOLOTYN. We have obtained limited product liability insurance coverage for our human clinical trials and
commercial sales of FOLOTYN. However, product liability insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive, and we may be unable to maintain such insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in
sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due to product liability. A successful product liability claim in excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.

Our success depends on the retention of our President and Chief Executive Officer and other key personnel.

We are highly dependent on our President and Chief Executive Officer, Paul L. Berns, and other members of our management team. We are
named as the beneficiary on a term life insurance policy covering Mr. Berns in the amount of $10.0 million. We also depend on key employees and academic collaborators for each of our
research and development programs. The loss of any of our key employees or academic collaborators could delay the development and commercialization of FOLOTYN or result in the termination of our
FOLOTYN development program in its entirety. Mr. Berns and others on our executive management team have employment agreements with us, but the agreements provide for "at-will"
employment with no specified term. Our future success also will depend in large part on our continued ability to attract and retain other highly qualified scientific,

37

---



Table of Contents

technical
and management personnel, as well as personnel with expertise in clinical testing, governmental regulation and commercialization of pharmaceutical products. We face competition for personnel
from other companies, universities, public and private research institutions, government entities and other organizations. If we are unsuccessful in our recruitment and retention efforts, our business
will be harmed.

We
also rely on consultants, collaborators and advisors to assist us in formulating and conducting our research and development programs. All of our consultants, collaborators and
advisors are employed by other employers or are self-employed and may have commitments to or consulting contracts with other entities that may limit their ability to contribute to our
company.

We cannot guarantee that we will be in compliance with all potentially applicable regulations.

The development, manufacturing, pricing, marketing, sale and reimbursement of FOLOTYN, together with our general operations, are
subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and other authorities within the United States and numerous entities outside of the United States. We have fewer employees than many other companies
that have one or more product candidates that are approved for marketing and we rely heavily on third parties to conduct many important functions.

As
a publicly-traded company, we are subject to significant regulations including the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. We cannot assure you that we are or will be in compliance with all
potentially applicable regulations. If we fail to comply with the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 or any other regulations, we
could be subject to a range of consequences, including restrictions on our ability to sell equity securities or otherwise raise capital funds, the de-listing of our common stock from The
NASDAQ Global Market, suspension or termination of our clinical trials, failure to obtain approval to market FOLOTYN, restrictions on future products or our manufacturing processes, significant fines,
or other sanctions or litigation.

If our internal controls over financial reporting are not considered effective, our business and stock price could be adversely affected.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial
reporting as of the end of each fiscal year, and to include a management report assessing the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting in our annual report on
Form 10-K for that fiscal year. Section 404 also requires our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, and report on, management's assessment of our
internal controls over financial reporting.

Our
management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and all
fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. Further, the design of a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud involving a company have been, or will be, detected. The design of any system of
controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and we cannot assure you that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions. Over time, controls may become ineffective because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in
a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. We cannot assure you that we or our independent registered public accounting firm will
not identify a material weakness in our internal controls in the future. A material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting would require management and our independent registered
public accounting firm to consider our internal

38

---



Table of Contents

controls
as ineffective. If our internal controls over financial reporting are not considered effective, we may experience a loss of public confidence, which could have an adverse effect on our
business and on the market price of our common stock.

Our revenue recognition model under the sell-through method is complex and depends upon the accuracy and consistency of third party data as well as dependence
upon key finance and accounting personnel to maintain and implement the surrounding controls.

We have developed a revenue recognition model under the sell-through method that is complex and incorporates a significant
amount of third party data from our wholesalers. To effectively maintain the revenue recognition model, we depend to a considerable degree upon the timely and accurate reporting to us of such data
from these third parties and our key accounting and finance personnel to accurately interpolate such data into the model. If the third party data is not calculated on a consistent basis and reported
to us on an accurate or timely basis or we lose any of our key accounting and finance personnel, the accuracy of our consolidated financial statements could be materially affected. This could cause
future delays in our earnings announcements, regulatory filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and delisting with the NASDAQ.

If we do not progress in our programs as anticipated, our stock price could decrease.

For planning purposes, we estimate the timing of a variety of clinical, regulatory and other milestones, such as when a certain product
candidate will enter clinical development, when a clinical trial will be initiated or completed, or when an application for regulatory approval will be filed. Some of our estimates are included in
this report. Our estimates are based on information available to us as of the date of this report and a variety of assumptions. Many of the underlying assumptions are outside of our control. If
milestones are not achieved when we estimated that they would be, investors could be disappointed and our stock price may decrease.

Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P. controls a substantial percentage of the voting power of our outstanding common stock.

On March 2, 2005, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., or
Warburg, and certain other investors in connection with an equity financing. In connection with this financing, Warburg and certain of its affiliates entered into a standstill agreement pursuant to
which they agreed not to pursue, for so long as they continue to own a specified number of shares of our common stock, certain activities the purpose or effect of which may be to change or influence
the control of our company.

As
of February 25, 2010, we had 104,724,779 shares of common stock outstanding, of which Warburg owned 26,124,430 shares, or approximately 25% of the voting power of our
outstanding common stock.
Although Warburg has entered into a standstill agreement with us, Warburg is, and will continue to be, able to exercise substantial influence over any actions requiring stockholder approval.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent an acquisition of us, even if an acquisition would be
beneficial to our stockholders, and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could make it
more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. In addition, these provisions may make it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our
board of directors. Because our board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions could in turn affect

39

---



Table of Contents

any
attempt by our stockholders to replace current members of our management team. These provisions include:



In
addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any of a broad range of
business combinations with an interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date on which the stockholder became an interested stockholder. This provision could have the effect of
delaying or preventing a change of control, whether or not it is desired by or beneficial to our stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the three-year moratorium imposed on business
combinations by Section 203 will not apply to Warburg because, prior to the date on which Warburg became an interested stockholder, our board of directors approved the transactions that
resulted in Warburg becoming an interested stockholder. However, in connection with Warburg's participation in an equity financing we completed in March 2005, Warburg and certain of its affiliates
entered into a standstill agreement pursuant to which they agreed not to pursue, for so long as they continue to own a specified number of shares of our common stock, certain activities the purpose or
effect of which may be to change or influence the control of our company.

We have adopted a stockholder rights plan that may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that is beneficial to our stockholders.

In May 2003, our board of directors adopted a stockholder rights plan that may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing
a merger or acquisition of us that our stockholders may consider beneficial by diluting the ability of a potential acquirer to acquire us. Pursuant to the terms of the stockholder rights plan, when a
person or group, except under certain circumstances, acquires 15% or more of our outstanding common stock or 10 business days after announcement of a tender or exchange offer for 15% or more of our
outstanding common stock, the rights (except those rights held by the person or group who has acquired or announced an offer to acquire 15% or more of our outstanding common stock) would generally
become exercisable for shares of our common stock at a discount. Because the potential acquirer's rights would not become exercisable for our shares of common stock at a discount, the potential
acquirer would suffer substantial dilution and may lose its ability to acquire us. In addition, the existence of the plan itself may deter a potential acquirer from acquiring or making an offer to
acquire us. As a result, either by operation of the plan or by its potential deterrent effect, mergers and acquisitions of our company that our stockholders may consider in their best interests may
not occur.

Because
Warburg owns a substantial percentage of our outstanding common stock, we amended the stockholder rights plan in connection with Warburg's participation in an equity financing we
completed in March 2005 to provide that Warburg and its affiliates will be exempt from the stockholder rights plan, unless Warburg and its affiliates become, without the prior consent of our board of
directors, the beneficial owner of more than 44% of our common stock. Likewise, in connection with our completion of an underwritten offering of 9,000,000 shares of common stock in February 2007, we

40

---



Table of Contents

amended
the stockholder rights plan to provide that Baker Brothers Life Sciences, L.P. and certain other affiliated funds, which are collectively referred to herein as "Baker," will be exempt
from the stockholder rights plan, unless Baker becomes, without the prior consent of our board of directors, the beneficial owner of more than 20% of our common stock. According to filings with the
SEC, Baker owned less than 10% of our outstanding common stock as of February 2009. Under the stockholder rights plan, our board of directors has express authority to amend the rights plan without
stockholder approval.

Unstable market conditions may have serious adverse consequences on our business.

The recent economic downturn and market instability has made the business climate more volatile and more costly. Our general business
strategy may be adversely affected by unpredictable and unstable market conditions. If the current equity and credit markets deteriorate further, or do not improve, it may make any necessary equity or
debt financing more difficult, more costly, and more dilutive. While we believe we have adequate capital resources to meet our expected working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at
least the next 12 months, a radical economic downturn or increase in our expenses could require additional financing on less than attractive rates or on terms that are excessively dilutive to
existing stockholders. Failure to secure any necessary financing in a timely manner and on favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on our growth strategy, financial performance and stock
price and could require us to delay or abandon clinical development plans. There is a risk that one or more of our current service providers, manufacturers or other partners may encounter difficulties
during challenging economic times, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The market price for our common stock has been and may continue to be highly volatile, and an active trading market for our common stock may never exist.

We cannot assure you that an active trading market for our common stock will exist at any time. Holders of our common stock may not be
able to sell shares quickly or at the market price if trading in our common stock is not active. The trading price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile and
could be subject to wide fluctuations in price in
response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:



41

---



Table of Contents



Public
companies in general and companies included on The NASDAQ Global Market in particular have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. There has been particular volatility in the market prices of securities of biotechnology and other life sciences companies, and the
market prices of these companies have often fluctuated because of problems or successes in a given market segment or because investor interest has shifted to other segments. These broad market and
industry factors may cause the market price of our common stock to decline, regardless of our operating performance. We have no control over this volatility and can only focus our efforts on our own
operations, and even these may be affected due to the state of the capital markets. In the past, following large price declines in the public market price of a company's securities, securities class
action litigation has often been initiated against that company, including in 2004 against us. Litigation of this type could result in substantial costs and diversion of management's attention and
resources, which would hurt our business. Any adverse determination in litigation could also subject us to significant liabilities.

Substantial sales of shares may impact the market price of our common stock.

If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock, the market price of our common stock may decline. These sales also
might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we consider appropriate. We are unable to predict the effect that sales may have
on the then prevailing market price of our common stock. We have entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with Warburg pursuant to which Warburg is entitled to certain registration rights with
respect to shares of our common stock. On July 20, 2009, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the SEC providing for the registration for resale by Warburg of up
to 26,124,430 shares of our common stock, which registration statement was declared effective on August 28, 2009.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

Our corporate headquarters facility consists of approximately 34,536 square feet in Westminster, Colorado. We lease our corporate
headquarters facility pursuant to a lease agreement that expires on January 31, 2012. We also lease an office in Princeton, New Jersey which consists of approximately 9,458 square feet. The
lease for this office expires on September 30, 2011. We believe that our leased facilities are adequate to meet our needs at this time.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 4.    RESERVED

42

---





Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information and Holders

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol "ALTH." The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market:

Year Ended December 31, 2009

HIGH

LOWFirst Quarter

$
9.30

$
5.62Second Quarter

$
8.50

$
5.34Third Quarter

$
8.79

$
6.60Fourth Quarter

$
7.39

$
5.46Year Ended December 31, 2008

HIGH

LOWFirst Quarter

$
7.70

$
4.88Second Quarter

$
7.15

$
4.89Third Quarter

$
10.19

$
6.61Fourth Quarter

$
8.86

$
3.82


On
February 25, 2010, we had approximately 56 holders of record of our common stock.

43

---



Table of Contents

Stock Performance Measurement Comparison(1)

The following graph shows the total stockholder return of an investment of $100 in cash on December 31, 2004 for (i) the
Company's common stock, (ii) the Nasdaq Composite Index and (iii) the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index. All values assume reinvestment of the full amount of all dividends and are calculated as
of December 31 of each year:

Comparison of 5 year Cumulative Total Return on Investment

GRAPHIC

Total Return Analysis

12/31/2004

12/31/2005

12/31/2006

12/31/2007

12/31/2008

12/31/2009Allos Therapeutics, Inc.

$
100.00

$
89.58

$
243.75

$
262.08

$
255.00

$
274.17NASDAQ Composite

$
100.00

$
101.37

$
111.03

$
121.92

$
72.49

$
104.49NASDAQ Biotechnology

$
100.00

$
102.84

$
103.89

$
108.65

$
94.93

$
109.77


(1)The
information in this section is not "soliciting material," is not deemed "filed" with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language in any such filing.


Dividends

We have never paid dividends to holders of our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable
future as we intend to retain any earnings for use in our business. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our results of
operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our board of directors deems relevant.

44

---





Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," included in this report. The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007, and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, are derived from, and qualified by reference to, our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this report. The
statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, are derived from our audited financial
statements that do not appear in this report. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected in the future.

Years Ended December 31,2009

2008

2007

2006

2005(in thousands, except share and per share data)Statement of Operations Data:Net product sales

$
3,585

$


$


$


$
Operating costs and expenses:Cost of sales, excluding amortization expense


408











Research and development


32,618


30,595


22,992


16,606


12,481Selling, general and administrative


44,448


23,044


19,672


14,876


9,044Amortization of intangible asset


121











Restructuring and separation costs











646


380Total operating costs and expenses


77,595


53,639


42,664


32,128


21,905Operating loss


(74,010
)

(53,639
)

(42,664
)

(32,128
)

(21,905
)Interest and other income, net


380


1,909


3,294


1,916


1,768Loss before income taxes


(73,630
)

(51,730
)

(39,370
)

(30,212
)

(20,137
)Income tax benefit


77











Net loss


(73,553
)

(51,730
)

(39,370
)

(30,212
)

(20,137
)Dividend related to beneficial conversion feature of preferred stock














(623
)Net loss attributable to common stockholders

$
(73,553
)
$
(51,730
)
$
(39,370
)
$
(30,212
)
$
(20,760
)Net loss per share: basic and diluted

$
(0.81
)
$
(0.69
)
$
(0.60
)
$
(0.55
)
$
(0.45
)Weighted average shares: basic and diluted


90,469,720


75,399,774


65,188,913


55,299,614


46,070,686




As of December 31,2009

2008

2007

2006

2005(in thousands)Balance Sheet Data:Cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities

$
158,544

$
83,965

$
57,756

$
32,796

$
55,282Working capital


151,305


77,981


51,958


28,897


52,477Total assets


175,384


89,340


61,460


36,382


57,081Common stock and additional paid-in capital


532,756


379,123


300,508


238,109


231,637Accumulated deficit


(373,212
)

(299,659
)

(247,929
)

(208,559
)

(178,347
)Total stockholders' equity


159,544


79,464


52,579


29,550


53,290


45

---





Table of Contents

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

We are a biopharmaceutical company committed to the development and commercialization of innovative anti-cancer
therapeutics. Our goal is to build a profitable company by generating income from products we develop and commercialize, either alone or with one or more potential strategic partners. We strive to
develop proprietary products that have the potential to improve the standard of care in cancer therapy.

We
are currently focused on the development and commercialization of FOLOTYN (pralatrexate injection). FOLOTYN is a targeted antifolate inhibitor designed to accumulate
preferentially in cancer cells. FOLOTYN targets the inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase, or DHFR, an enzyme critical to DNA and RNA synthesis and tumor growth, which triggers cancer cell death.
FOLOTYN can be delivered as a single agent, for which we currently have approval for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma, or PTCL, and has the
potential to be used in combination therapy regimens. We believe that FOLOTYN's unique mechanism of action offers us the ability to target the drug for development in a variety of hematological
malignancies and solid tumor indications. We currently retain exclusive worldwide commercial rights to FOLOTYN for all indications. We may also seek to grow our product portfolio through product
acquisition and in-licensing efforts.

On
September 24, 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, granted accelerated approval of FOLOTYN for use as a single agent for the treatment of patients with relapsed
or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma, or PTCL. This approval was based on overall response rate from our pivotal PROPEL trial. Clinical benefit such as improvement in
progression-free survival or overall survival has not been demonstrated. FOLOTYN represents our first drug approved for marketing in the United States. FOLOTYN is the first and only drug
approved by the FDA for this indication and represents a new treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL.

We
began making FOLOTYN available for commercial sale in the United States on October 5, 2009 and commenced our commercial launch of FOLOTYN in January 2010. We have established a
commercial organization, including sales, marketing, supply chain management and reimbursement capabilities, to drive sales of FOLOTYN in the United States. Currently, our commercial organization
includes approximately 50 sales specialists. We believe the market for relapsed or refractory PTCL is addressable with a targeted U.S. sales and marketing organization, and we intend to promote
FOLOTYN ourselves in the United States. Accordingly, we have commenced our planned principal operations and are no longer considered to be in the development stage as of year end 2009.

In
connection with the accelerated approval, we are required to conduct several post-approval studies that are intended to verify and describe FOLOTYN's clinical benefit in
patients with T-cell lymphoma and assess whether FOLOTYN poses a serious risk of altered drug levels resulting from organ impairment. In addition to these post-approval
studies, we are also currently developing FOLOTYN both as a single agent and in combination therapy regimens in a variety of hematologic malignancies and solid tumor indications, including cutaneous
T-cell lymphoma, B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and advanced or metastatic relapsed transitional cell carcinoma of the
urinary bladder.

Based
on the results of the PROPEL trial, we intend to seek regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN in Europe for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. Our current
intention is to submit a Marketing Authorization Application in Europe in the fourth quarter of 2010. We may also seek regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed
or refractory PTCL in Japan and other countries. We intend to enter into co-promotion or

46

---



Table of Contents

out-licensing
arrangements with other pharmaceutical or biotechnology partners where necessary to reach foreign market segments and when deemed strategically and economically advisable.

Results of Operations

We have incurred significant net losses and negative cash flows from operations. We have incurred these losses principally from costs
incurred in our research and development programs and from our selling, general and administrative expenses. Our primary business activities have been focused on the development of FOLOTYN and other
programs that we discontinued in previous years, including RH1 which we discontinued in June 2009. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we had net losses of
$73.6 million, $51.7 million and $39.4 million, respectively. Research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were
$32.6 million, $30.6 million and $23.0 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, we had accumulated a deficit of $373.2 million.

Our
ability to generate significant revenue and achieve profitability is dependent on our ability to successfully commercialize FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or
refractory PTCL in the United States. The amount of our future product sales are subject to significant uncertainty. We may never generate sufficient revenue from product sales to become profitable.

We
expect to continue to spend substantial amounts on research and development, including amounts spent on conducting clinical trials and seeking additional regulatory approvals for
FOLOTYN. We also expect to continue to spend substantial amounts on selling, general and administrative expenses in order to commercialize FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or
refractory PTCL. Therefore, we may need to raise additional capital to support our future operations. Our actual capital requirements will depend on many factors, including those discussed under the
"Liquidity and Capital Resources" section below.

If
we are unable to generate meaningful amounts of revenue from future product sales or cannot otherwise raise sufficient additional funds to support our operations, we may be required
to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more of our development programs and our business and future prospects for revenue and profitability may be harmed.

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

Net product sales.Net product sales represent total sell-through revenue less distributor fees and estimated allowances for rebates and
chargebacks to be incurred on the selling price of FOLOTYN related to the respective revenue, as further described in the "Critical Accounting Policies" section below. We began making FOLOTYN
available for commercial sale in the United States on October 5, 2009.

We
sell FOLOTYN to a limited number of pharmaceutical wholesale distributors, or distributors, all of which are affiliates under common control. These distributors then resell FOLOTYN to
the patients' respective health care providers. We have determined that domestic shipments of FOLOTYN made to distributors do not meet the criteria for revenue recognition at the time of shipment, and
therefore such shipments are accounted for using the sell-through method. Under the sell-through method, we do not recognize revenue upon shipment of FOLOTYN to the
distributor. For these product sales, we invoice the distributor and record deferred revenue equal to the gross invoice sales price. We then recognize revenue when the product is sold through, or upon
shipment of the product from the distributors to the distributors' customers. Because of the price of FOLOTYN, the limited number of patients, the short period from sale of product to patient infusion
and limited contractual return rights, FOLOTYN distributors and their customers generally carry limited inventory. Through December 31, 2009, we have had no refunds or returns. Deferred revenue
results from amounts receivable in advance of revenue recognition.

47

---



Table of Contents

Balances
and activity in the deferred revenue account and a reconciliation of gross to net product sales for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

Years Ended
December 31,2009

2008

2007(in millions)Gross product sales to distributors

$
4.9

$


$
Less: Gross product sales recognized


(4.2
)




Deferred revenue

$
0.7

$


$
Gross product sales

$
4.2

$


$
Less: Gross to Net Sales AdjustmentsGovernment rebates and chargebacks


(0.5
)




Distribution fees


(0.1
)




Net product sales

$
3.6

$


$



The
$3.6 million of net product sales in 2009 relates to sales of FOLOTYN commencing in the fourth quarter of 2009. There were no corresponding net product sales in 2008 or 2007.
We expect sales of FOLOTYN to increase over the next several years as we increase our penetration of the market for relapsed or refractory PTCL.

Balances
and activity in the government rebates and chargebacks and distribution fees payable accounts for the year ended December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Government
Rebates and
Chargebacks

Distribution
Fees(in millions)Balance at December 31, 2008

$


$
Reserve for sales


0.5


0.1Credits made for sales/payments


(
)

(
)Balance at December 31, 2009

$
0.5

$
0.1


Government
rebates and chargebacks reflect management estimates which are further discussed in the "Critical Accounting Policies" section below.

Cost of sales, excluding amortization expense.Cost of sales, excluding amortization expense, includes royalties, inventory packaging
and labeling,
warehousing and shipping costs associated with FOLOTYN product revenue.

Years Ended
December 31,2009

2008

2007(in millions)Cost of sales, excluding amortization expense

$
0.4

$


$



Prior
to receiving FDA approval of FOLOTYN on September 24, 2009, all costs related to purchases of the active pharmaceutical ingredient and manufacturing of the product were
recorded as research and development expense. Until we sell the inventory for which the costs were previously expensed, our cost of sales will reflect only royalties and other incremental costs
incurred subsequent to the FDA approval date. Accordingly, our cost of sales of FOLOTYN will be lower with respect to product that was manufactured prior to FDA approval. This occurred with respect to
all sales of

48

---



Table of Contents

FOLOTYN
in the fourth quarter of 2009 and is expected to occur for a significant amount of sales of FOLOTYN in 2010.

The
$408,000 of cost of sales, excluding amortization expense in 2009 was primarily due to an 8% royalty on gross product sales payable to the licensors of FOLOTYN under the terms of our
license agreement. There were no corresponding cost of sales in 2008 or 2007.

Research and development.Research and development expenses include the costs of certain personnel, preclinical studies, clinical trials,
 regulatory
affairs, biostatistical data analysis, third-party manufacturing costs for development of drug materials for use in preclinical studies and clinical trials and, manufacturing costs and licensing fees
incurred for FOLOTYN prior to receipt of FDA approval.

Years Ended
December 31,2009

2008

2007(in millions)Research and development expenses

$
32.6

$
30.6

$
23.0


The
$2.0 million increase in research and development expenses in 2009 as compared to 2008 was primarily due to the following:



These
increases were partially offset by:



The
$7.6 million increase in research and development expenses in 2008 as compared to 2007 was primarily due to the following:



49

---



Table of Contents



These
increases were partially offset by:



We
expect research and development expenses to increase in 2010 as compared to 2009 due to the following:



We
charge direct internal and external research and development expenses to the respective development programs. In December 2002, we entered into a license agreement with Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, SRI International and Southern Research Institute, as amended, under which we obtained exclusive worldwide rights to a portfolio of patents and patent applications
related to FOLOTYN and its uses. Through December 31, 2009, we have incurred direct costs of approximately $58.3 million associated with the development of FOLOTYN, including
$52.5 million related to research and development expenses for FOLOTYN and an additional $5.8 million related to a milestone payment as a result of the FDA's approval to market FOLOTYN
on September 24, 2009, which was capitalized as an intangible asset on our balance sheet. Research and development programs that have been discontinued include the RH-1 program that
was discontinued in mid-2009 and the EFAPROXYN program that was discontinued in mid-2007. In addition, we incur indirect costs that are not allocated to specific programs
because such costs benefit multiple development programs. These unallocated costs relate primarily to our lead program during the respective periods; which was FOLOTYN for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, since EFAPROXYN was discontinued in mid-2007. These consist primarily of salaries and benefits for all clinical, regulatory affairs, biostatistical
analysis and manufacturing personnel, consulting and professional fees, including costs associated with filing our NDA for FOLOTYN, facilities costs and other internal-shared resources related to the
development and maintenance of infrastructure, systems and processes applicable to all of our programs.

50

---



Table of Contents

The
following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

Years Ended
December 31,2009

2008

2007(in millions)FOLOTYN

$
15.4

$
15.6

$
10.3Discontinued programs





0.3


2.3Unallocated


17.2


14.7


10.4Total research and development expenses

$
32.6

$
30.6

$
23.0


The
timing and costs to complete the successful clinical development of FOLOTYN for additional indications is highly uncertain, and therefore difficult to estimate. The lengthy process
of seeking regulatory approvals for additional indications, and the subsequent compliance with applicable regulations, require the expenditure of substantial resources. Clinical development timelines,
likelihood of success and total costs vary widely and are impacted by a variety of factors, including those discussed in the "Risk Factors" section of Part I, Item 1A above. Because of
these risks and uncertainties, we cannot predict whether or when we will successfully complete the development of FOLOTYN for any additional indications or the ultimate costs of such efforts.

Selling, general and administrative.Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs for sales and
marketing activities, corporate development, medical affairs, executive administration, corporate offices and related infrastructure.

Years Ended December 31,2009

2008

2007(in millions)Selling, general and administrative expenses

$
44.4

$
23.0

$
19.7


The
$21.4 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2009 as compared to 2008 was primarily due to the following:



These
increases were partially offset by a $815,000 decrease in portfolio and intellectual property development activities.

51

---



Table of Contents

The $3.4 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2008 as compared to 2007 was primarily due to the
following:



We
expect selling, general and administrative expenses to increase in 2010 as compared to 2009 due to the following:



Stock-based Compensation Expense.Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 has been
recognized in our Statements of Operations as follows:

Years Ended
December 31,2009

2008

2007(in millions)Research and development

$
2.4

$
3.1

$
2.1Selling, general and administrative


6.3


4.9


4.6Total stock-based compensation expense

$
8.7

$
8.0

$
6.7


Effective
September 30, 2009, Pablo J. Cagnoni, M.D., our former Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer (CMO), resigned. As a result of his resignation, we adjusted the
forfeiture rate applied to his equity compensation, which resulted in a one-time $906,000 reversal of research and development stock-based compensation expense during the year ended
December 31, 2009, of which $699,000 related to stock option awards, $166,000 related to restricted stock awards and $41,000 related to restricted stock unit awards.

Of
the $8.7 million of stock-based compensation recognized in the year ended December 31, 2009, $8.1 million was related to our stock option plans, $416,000 related
to restricted stock and restricted stock units and $116,000 related to our employee stock purchase plan. Of the $8.0 million of stock-based compensation recognized in the year ended
December 31, 2008, $7.5 million was related to our stock option plans, $423,000 related to restricted stock and $59,000 related to our employee stock

52

---



Table of Contents

purchase
plan. Of the $6.7 million of stock-based compensation recognized in the year ended December 31, 2007, $5.9 million was related to our stock option plans, $690,000 related
to restricted stock and $61,000 related to our employee stock purchase plan. The $660,000 increase in stock-based compensation expense in 2009 as compared to 2008 was primarily due to an increase in
the number of options granted to new employees and to existing employees pursuant to our annual grants that occurred in February 2009, offset by the reversal related to the resignation of our former
CMO discussed above. The $1.4 million increase in stock-based compensation expense in 2008 as compared to 2007 was primarily due to the additional stock options granted during the year ended
December 31, 2008.

As
of December 31, 2009, the unrecorded stock-based compensation balance related to stock option awards was $8.1 million and will be recognized over an estimated
weighted-average amortization period of 1.4 years. As of December 31, 2009, the unrecorded stock-based compensation balance related to restricted stock units was approximately $547,000
and will be recognized over an estimated weighted-average amortization period of 1.6 years. As of December 31, 2009, the unrecorded stock-based compensation balance related to restricted
stock awards was approximately $53,000 and will be recognized over an estimated weighted-average amortization period of 1.2 years.

Amortization of intangible asset.Amortization of intangible asset includes amortization of capitalized license costs over the expected
patent life
of the related product.

Amortization
of intangible asset expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $121,000. There was no expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 or 2007. The $121,000
expense in the year ended December 31, 2009 was due to the amortization of the $5.8 million intangible asset resulting from the milestone payment under our license agreement for FOLOTYN
in September 2009. Amortization expense is being recorded on a straight line basis over the estimated remaining life of the composition of matter patent for FOLOTYN, which we expect to last until
July 16, 2022. This includes the anticipated Hatch-Waxman extension that provides patent protection for drug compounds for a period of up to five years to compensate for time spent in
development. This term is our best estimate of the life of the patent. If, however, the Hatch-Waxman extension is not granted, the intangible asset will be amortized over a shorter period.

Interest and Other Income, Net.Interest income, net of interest expense, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was
$380,000,
$1.9 million, and $3.3 million, respectively. The $1.5 million decrease in 2009 as compared to 2008 was primarily due to lower yields on our cash, cash equivalents and investments
in marketable securities and a $149,000 loss on the disposal of certain software that was no longer in use during the three months ended June 30, 2009, offset by a $395,000 decrease in realized
losses on the sale of certain of our investments in marketable securities. The $1.4 million decrease in 2008 as compared to 2007 was primarily due to lower yields on our cash, cash equivalents
and investments in marketable securities, and a realized loss of approximately $552,000 on the sale of certain of our investments in marketable securities during the three months ended
September 30, 2008. We have the ability and intent to hold our remaining investments in marketable securities to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the investments as of
December 31, 2009, although we monitor our investment portfolio with the primary objectives of preserving principal and maintaining proper liquidity to meet our operating needs.

Income Taxes.Income tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $77,000 and $0, respectively. The $77,000
increase in
income tax benefit in the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 was related to a refundable research and experimentation income tax credit received during 2009,
with no corresponding amount in 2008. As of December 31, 2009, we had available approximately $238.7 million of net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards, after taking into consideration
NOLs expected to expire unused due to the limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, and which includes approximately $6.5 million of deductions related to

53

---



Table of Contents

stock-based
compensation that are not realized as deferred tax assets until current taxes payable can be reduced. Of these NOL carryforwards, $2.3 million will expire beginning in 2010,
$3.9 million in 2011, $6.2 million in 2012 and the remaining NOL carryforwards expire in 2018 through 2029. In addition, as of December 31, 2009, we had research and development
credit and orphan drug credit carryforwards, after taking into consideration the Section 382 limitation, of $4.1 million and $5.8 million, respectively, to offset future regular
tax expense. Since the Company's formation, it has raised capital through the issuance of capital stock on several occasions which, combined with shareholders' subsequent disposition of those shares,
has resulted in four changes of control in 1994, 1998, 2001 and 2005, as defined by Section 382. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382, results from transactions
increasing the ownership of certain shareholders or public groups in the stock of a corporation by more than 50% within a three-year period. As a result of the most recent ownership change
in 2005, utilization of approximately $59.9 million of NOL carryforwards generated prior to the latest change are subject to an annual limitation of approximately $2.2 million under
Section 382, determined by multiplying the value of our stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Additionally, we have a
recognized built-in gain that will increase the annual limitation by $3.3 million for each of the five years after the 2005 ownership change. Any unused annual limitation may be
carried over to subsequent years, and the amount of the limitation may, under certain circumstances, be subject to adjustment if the fair value of the Company's net assets are determined to be below
or in excess of the tax basis of such assets at the time of the ownership change, and such unrealized loss or gain is recognized during the five-year period after the ownership change.
Subsequent
ownership changes, as defined in Section 382, could further limit the amount of our NOL carryforwards and research and development credits that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable
income.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2009, we had $158.5 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments in marketable securities. Of
this amount, $141.1 million was held in money market funds and cash accounts and $17.4 million was held in U.S. Treasury bills, certificates of deposit and high-grade
corporate notes with a weighted average duration of the remaining time to maturity of approximately two months. Until required for use in our business, we invest our cash reserves in bank deposits,
money market funds, certificates of deposit, high-grade corporate notes and U.S. government instruments in accordance with our investment policy.

Since
our inception, we have financed our operations primarily through public and private sales of our equity securities, which have resulted in net proceeds to us of
$473.5 million through December 31, 2009.

Net
cash used to fund our operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $62.2 million, $42.9 million and $30.8 million,
respectively.

For
fiscal year 2010, total operating costs and expenses are expected to approximate $120 to $130 million, excluding non-cash stock-based compensation expense.
Stock-based compensation expense is expected to approximate $13 to $15 million. Actual financial results for 2010 will vary based upon many factors, including the growth of FOLOTYN sales and
rate of patient enrollment in clinical trials that are ongoing and planned for initiation in 2010.

Net
cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $28.0 million and consisted of the proceeds from maturities and sales, net of purchases
of investments in marketable securities, partially offset by $5.8 million of cash paid related to the milestone payment made under our license agreement for FOLOTYN upon FDA approval in
September 2009 and $1.4 million for the acquisition of property and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was
$13.2 million and $19.1 million, respectively, and consisted primarily

54

---



Table of Contents

of
purchases of investments in marketable securities, partially offset by the proceeds from maturities of investments in marketable securities.

Net
cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $145.0 million and consisted of $47.0 million of net proceeds from the sale of
7,750,000 shares of common stock at the public offering price of $6.30 in April 2009, $93.1 million of net proceeds from the sale of 14,000,000 shares of common stock at the public offering
price of $7.10 in October 2009, and $4.9 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock associated with stock options exercised by our employees and sales of stock under our employee
stock purchase plan. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $70.6 million and consisted primarily of the net proceeds from the sale of
12,420,000 shares of our common stock in May 2008 in an underwritten public offering at a price of $5.64 per share and $5.4 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock associated with
stock options exercised by our employees and sales of stock under our employee stock purchase plan. Net cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2007 was
$55.7 million and resulted primarily from the sale of 9,000,000 shares of common stock in February 2007 in an underwritten offering at a price of $6.00 per share, $5.5 million of
proceeds associated with the exercise of common stock options, common stock warrants and sales of stock under our employee stock purchase plan, and the release of $183,000 of restricted cash in
connection with a reduction of the letter of credit required pursuant to the lease for our corporate headquarters facility.

Based
upon the current status of our product development and commercialization plans, we believe that our cash, cash equivalents, and investments in marketable securities as of
December 31, 2009 should be adequate to support our operations through at least the next 12 months, although there can be no assurance that this can, in fact, be accomplished. Our
forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement that involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results
could vary materially.

We
anticipate continuing our current development programs and beginning other long-term development projects involving FOLOTYN, including the post-approval
clinical studies required for FOLOTYN. These projects may require many years and substantial expenditures to complete and may ultimately be unsuccessful. In addition, we expect to incur significant
costs relating to the commercialization of FOLOTYN, including costs related to our sales and marketing, medical affairs and manufacturing operations. Therefore, we may need to raise additional capital
to support our future operations. Our actual capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:



55

---



Table of Contents

We
may seek to obtain this additional capital through equity or debt financings, arrangements with corporate partners, or from other sources. Such financings or arrangements, if
successfully consummated, may be dilutive to our existing stockholders. However, there is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed, or that, if available, we will obtain
such financing on terms that are favorable to our stockholders or us. In the event that additional funds are obtained through arrangements with collaborative partners or other sources, such
arrangements may require us to relinquish rights to some of our technologies, product candidates or products under development, which we might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize ourselves, on
terms that are less favorable than might otherwise be available. If we are unable to generate meaningful amounts of revenue from future product sales or cannot otherwise raise sufficient additional
funds to support our operations, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more of our development programs and our business and future prospects for revenue and
profitability may be harmed.

Obligations and Commitments

Below is a schedule of the timing of contractual commitments, by fiscal year, related to our leases, service contracts and license
agreements. We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

2010

2011 to 2012

2013 to 2014

After 2014

TotalOperating lease obligations

$
1,133,000

$
1,324,000

$


$


$
2,457,000Total obligations

$
1,133,000

$
1,324,000

$


$


$
2,457,000


Operating
lease obligations represent our future minimum rental commitments for non-cancelable operating leases for our facilities and automobiles. We lease our corporate
headquarters facility pursuant to a lease agreement that expires on January 31, 2012. Our lease for an office in Princeton, New Jersey expires on September 30, 2011.

Based
on the results of the PROPEL trial, we intend to seek regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN in Europe and other countries for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory
PTCL. Our current intention is to submit a Marketing Authorization Application in Europe in the fourth quarter of 2010. Under the terms of our license agreement for FOLOTYN, we are required to make an
additional milestone payment of $3.5 million upon regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN in Europe.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience, available information and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following policies to be the most critical to an understanding of our financial
condition and results of operations because they require us to make estimates, assumptions and informed management judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain:



56

---



Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition.We generate revenue from product sales. We recognize product revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.
Revenue is
realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
(3) our price to the buyer is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is
reasonably assured. Revenue from sales transactions where the buyer has the right to return the product is recognized at the time of sale only if (1) our price to the buyer is substantially
fixed or determinable at the date of sale, (2) the buyer has paid us, or the buyer is obligated to pay us and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product, (3) the buyer's
obligation to us would not be changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product, (4) the buyer acquiring the product for resale has economic substance apart from
that provided by us, (5) we do not have significant obligations for future performance to directly bring about resale of the product by the buyer, and (6) the amount of future returns
can be reasonably estimated.

Given
our limited sales history, we are unable to estimate returns. Therefore, we have determined that domestic shipments of FOLOTYN made to distributors do not meet the criteria for
revenue recognition at the time of shipment, and therefore such shipments are accounted for using the sell-through method. Under the sell-through method, we do not recognize
revenue upon shipment of FOLOTYN to the distributor. For these product sales, we invoice the distributor and record deferred revenue equal to the gross invoice sales price. We then recognize revenue
when the product is sold through, or upon shipment of the product from the distributors to the distributors' customers. Because of the price of FOLOTYN, the limited number of patients, the short
period from sale of product to patient infusion and limited contractual return rights, FOLOTYN distributors and their customers generally carry limited inventory. Through December 31, 2009, we
have had no refunds or returns. Deferred revenue results amounts receivable in advance of revenue recognition.

We
estimate sell-through revenue and certain gross to net sales adjustments based upon analysis of third-party information, including information obtained from certain
distributors with respect to their inventory levels and sell-through to the distributors' customers. Our estimates are subject to the inherent limitations of estimates that rely on
third-party data. The information received from distributors is a product of their record-keeping process and their internal controls surrounding such processes. Our sales and revenue recognition
under the sell-through method reflect our estimate of actual product sold through the distribution channel.

Additionally
under the sell-through method, royalties paid based on unit shipments to distributors are deferred and recognized as royalty expense when those units are sold
through and recognized as revenue. Royalties paid are deferred as we have the right to offset royalties paid for product that are later returned against subsequent royalty obligations.

Net Product Sales

Our net product sales represent total sell-through revenue less estimated allowances for rebates and chargebacks to be
incurred on the selling price of FOLOTYN related to the respective revenue. In addition, we incur certain distributor fees related to the management of our product by distributors. These distributor
fees are recorded within net revenues and are known at the time of sale. Due to estimates and assumptions inherent in determining the
amount of rebates and chargebacks, the actual amount of claims for rebates and chargebacks may be different from our estimates, at which time we would adjust our reserves accordingly. Product sales
allowances and accruals are based on definitive contractual agreements or legal requirements (such as Medicaid laws and regulations) related to the purchase and/or utilization of the product by these
entities. Allowances and accruals are generally recorded in the same period that the related revenue is recognized.

57

---



Table of Contents

Classification of Product Sales Allowances and Accruals

Accruals related to Medicaid rebates, government chargebacks and distributor fees are recognized at the time sell-through
revenue is recorded, resulting in a reduction in product sales revenue and the recording of an increase in accrued expenses.

Medicaid Rebates

Our product is subject to state government-managed Medicaid programs whereby discounts and rebates are provided to participating state
governments. We record estimated rebates payable under governmental programs, including Medicaid, as a reduction of revenue at the time sell-through revenues are recorded. Our calculations
related to these rebate accruals require estimates, including estimates of customer mix primarily based on a combination of market and clinical research, to determine which sales will be subject to
rebates and the amount of such rebates. Given our lack of historical sales data, we utilized this research to estimate what we believe is the maximum potential Medicaid utilization of 64% of our sales
not already subject to Government Chargebacks, discussed below. We also consider any legal interpretations of the applicable laws related to Medicaid and qualifying federal and state government
programs and any new information regarding changes in the Medicaid programs' regulations and guidelines that would impact the amount of the rebates. In addition, because of the inherent difficulties
of predicting the impact on our estimates and assumptions of state Medicaid programs and regulations, we are unable to quantify an estimate of the reasonably likely effect of any such changes on our
results of operations or financial position. We update our estimates and assumptions each period and record any necessary adjustments to our reserves. Although allowances and accruals are recorded at
the time of product sale, certain rebates are typically paid out, on average, up to six months or longer after the sale. We account for Medicaid rebates by establishing an accrual in an amount equal
to our estimate of Medicaid rebate claims attributable to sales recognized in that period. If actual future results vary from our estimates, we may need to adjust our previous estimates, which would
affect our earnings in the period of the
adjustment. For reference purposes, a 10% to 20% variance to our estimated allowance for state Medicaid rebates as of December 31, 2009 would result in an approximate $39,000 to $78,000
adjustment to net product sales.

Government Chargebacks

Our products are subject to certain programs with federal government qualified entities whereby pricing on products is discounted below
distributor list price to participating entities. These entities purchase products through distributors at the discounted price, and the distributors charge the difference between their acquisition
cost and the discounted price back to us. We account for chargebacks by establishing an accrual in an amount equal to our estimate of maximum chargeback claims. We determine our chargeback estimates
based on actual FOLOTYN sell-through sales data from third-party information. Chargeback amounts are determined at the time of resale to the federal government qualified entities, and we
generally issue credits for such amounts within several weeks of receiving claims from the distributor. Estimated chargeback amounts are recorded at the time the sell-through sale occurs
and we adjust the accrual quarterly to reflect actual experience. Due to estimates and assumptions inherent in determining the amount of government chargebacks, the actual amount of claims for
chargebacks may be different from our estimates, at which time we would adjust our reserves accordingly.

Research and Development.Research and development expenditures are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development expenses
include the
costs of certain personnel, preclinical studies, clinical trials, regulatory affairs, biostatistical data analysis, third party manufacturing costs for development of drug materials for use in
clinical trials and preclinical studies and licensing fees for our product candidates prior to FDA approval. All finished drug inventory costs associated with production activities in our third party
manufacturing facilities prior to receiving FDA approval for such facilities

58

---



Table of Contents

and
prior to receiving regulatory approval to market our product are expensed to research and development expenses. Upon receipt of the related regulatory approval, we capitalize those manufacturing
costs for our marketed products at the lower of cost or market and then expense the sold inventory as a component of cost of sales. We accrue research and development expenses for activity as incurred
during the fiscal year and prior to receiving invoices from clinical sites and third party clinical and preclinical research organizations. We accrue external costs for clinical and preclinical
studies based on an evaluation of the following: the progress of the studies, including patient enrollment, dosing levels of patients enrolled, estimated costs to dose patients, invoices received, and
contracted costs with clinical sites and third party clinical and preclinical research organizations. Significant judgments and estimates must be made and used in determining the accrued balance in
any accounting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. During the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we did not have any changes in estimates that would have resulted in material adjustments to research and development expenses accrued in the prior period.

In
accordance with certain research and development agreements, we are obligated to make certain upfront payments upon execution of the agreement. We record these upfront payments as
prepaid research and development expenses. Such payments are recorded to research and development expense as services are performed. We evaluate on a quarterly basis whether events and circumstances
have occurred that may indicate impairment of remaining prepaid research and development expenses.

Inventory.Costs associated with the production of FOLOTYN bulk drug substance and formulated drug product by our third party
manufacturers are
recorded as either research and development expense or inventory.

Costs
associated with the production of FOLOTYN by our third party manufacturers are expensed to research and development expense at the time of production
when:



If
and when we receive the related regulatory approval, we would then capitalize those manufacturing costs for our marketed products at the lower of cost (first-in,
first-out method) or market (current replacement cost) with cost determined on the first-in, first-out basis and then expense the sold inventory as a component of
cost of goods sold.

Prior
to receiving FDA approval of FOLOTYN, all costs related to purchases of the active pharmaceutical ingredient and the manufacturing of the product were recorded as research and
development expense. Inventory as of December 31, 2009 consists of work in process of $36,000. Until we sell the inventory for which the costs were previously expensed, our cost of product
sales will reflect only incremental costs incurred subsequent to FDA approval. We continue to expense costs associated with clinical trial material as research and development expense.

Stock-based Compensation Expense.We have several stock-based compensation plans under which incentive and non-qualified stock options,
restricted stock units and restricted shares may be granted, and an employee stock purchase plan. We measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based
on the grant date fair value of the award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, the requisite service period
(usually the vesting period). We provide an estimate of forfeitures at initial grant date.

59

---



Table of Contents

During
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of approximately $8.7 million, $8.0 million and
$6.7 million, respectively, related to stock-based awards, including stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock and our employee stock purchase plan. As of December 31,
2009, the unrecorded deferred stock-based compensation balance related to these stock-based awards was approximately $8.7 million and will be recognized over the remaining vesting periods of
the awards. Judgments and estimates must be made and used in determining the factors used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards, including the expected forfeiture rate of our stock-based
awards, the expected life of our stock-based awards, and the expected volatility of our stock price. For more information on stock-based compensation expense during the year ended December 31,
2009, refer to Note 5 "Stock-Based Compensation Plans" of the Notes to our Financial Statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that eliminates the exemption from consolidation for qualifying special-purpose
entities, effective for financial asset transfers occurring after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. We currently do not have any of these
entities.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that assists in determining whether an enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This guidance is
effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. We currently do not have any such arrangements.

In
October 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that provides principles for allocation of consideration among an
arrangement's multiple-elements, allowing more flexibility in identifying and accounting for separate deliverables. The guidance introduces an estimated selling price method for valuing the elements
of a bundled arrangement if vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price is not available, and significantly expands related disclosure requirements. This guidance is
effective on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Alternatively, adoption may be on a
retrospective basis, and early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on our financial statements.

60

---





Table of Contents

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our financial instruments as of December 31, 2009 consisted of cash, cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities, and
accounts payable. All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. We invest in marketable securities in accordance with our
investment policy. The primary objectives of our investment policy are to preserve principal and maintain proper liquidity to meet operating needs. Our investment policy specifies credit quality
standards for our investments and limits the amount of credit exposure to any single issue, issuer or type of investment. The weighted average duration of the remaining time to maturity for our
portfolio of investments in marketable securities as of December 31, 2009 was approximately two months. As of December 31, 2009, our investments in marketable securities of
$17.4 million were all classified as held-to-maturity and were held in a variety of interest-bearing instruments, consisting mainly of U.S. Treasury bills and
certificates of deposit. We did not hold any derivative instruments, foreign exchange contracts, asset backed securities, mortgage backed securities, auction rate securities, or securities of issuers
in bankruptcy in our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2009. The value of our investments in marketable securities may be adversely affected by rating downgrades or bankruptcies affecting
the issuers of such securities, whether caused by instability in the global financial markets, lack of liquidity in the credit and capital markets, or other factors. We
have the ability and intent to hold our remaining investments in marketable securities to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the investments as of December 31, 2009, although we monitor
our investment portfolio with the primary objectives of preserving principal and maintaining proper liquidity to meet our operating needs.

Investments
in fixed-rate interest-bearing instruments carry varying degrees of interest rate risk. The fair market value of our fixed-rate securities may be
adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates. In general, securities with longer maturities are subject to greater interest-rate risk than those with shorter maturities. Due in part
to this factor, our interest income may fall short of expectations or we may suffer losses in principal if securities are sold that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. Due
to the short duration of our investment portfolio, we believe an immediate 10% change in interest rates would not be material to our financial condition or results of
operations.

ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements required by this Item are included in Item 15 of this report and are presented beginning on
page F-1.

ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of
our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Rule 13(a)-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2009 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.

61

---



Table of Contents

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Internal control
over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or Rule 15d-(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, a company's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer and effected by the company's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that:



Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our
management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making its assessment, management used the criteria
established inInternal ControlIntegrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based
on its assessment, management determined that, as of December 31, 2009, we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting based on those criteria.

In
addition, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In October 2009, we began shipping, and recording revenue related to, our newly approved product, FOLOTYN. The commercial sales efforts
required new processes and accounting estimates. In addition, we are using a third party logistics provider for shipping, inventory, customer service, and certain other logistical and financial
services related to sales of FOLOTYN. As a result, we are relying on their systems and processes for the above functions. We have performed a variety of reconciliations and have implemented certain
internal controls processes in various functional areas of the Company to ensure that financial data related to FOLOTYN sales activity has been correctly reflected in our financial statements. We are
not aware of any material adverse impacts on our internal controls over financial reporting as a result of the implementation of these new controls. There were no other changes in our internal control
over financial reporting during the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

None.

62

---



Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this Item concerning our directors is incorporated by reference to the information to be set forth in the
section entitled "Proposal 1Election of Directors" in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, or the Proxy Statement. The information required by this Item concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of
the Exchange Act is incorporated by reference to the information to be set forth in the section of the Proxy Statement entitled "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance." The
information required by this Item concerning the procedures by which our stockholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors is incorporated by reference to the information to be set forth
in the section of the Proxy Statement entitled "Information Regarding the Director Nomination Process." The information required by this Item concerning our Audit Committee is incorporated by
reference to the information to be set forth in the section of the Proxy Statement entitled "Audit Committee." The balance of the information required by this Item,
except as otherwise set forth below, is incorporated by reference to the information to be set forth in the section of the Proxy Statement entitled "Executive Officers."

Our
Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all of our directors, officers and employees. Stockholders may locate a copy of our Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics on our website at http://www.allos.com or request a free copy from:



To
date, there have been no waivers under our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. We will post any waivers, if and when granted, of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our
website.

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item regarding executive compensation is incorporated by reference to the information to be set forth
in the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled "Executive Compensation," "Director Compensation," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," and "Compensation Committee Report."

63

---



Table of Contents

ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides certain information with respect to our equity compensation plans in effect as of December 31,
2009:

Plan Category

Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options
and rights
(a)

Weighted-average
exercise price
of outstanding
options and rights
(b)

Number of securities
remaining available
for issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
(c)Equity compensation plans approved by security holders


8,447,975

$
5.73


10,645,001
(1)(2)Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders








Total


8,447,975

$
5.73


10,645,001
(1)(2)


---

Other Information

Other information required by this Item regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by
reference to the information to be set forth in the section of the Proxy Statement entitled "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management."

ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this Item regarding certain relationships and related transactions and director independence is
incorporated by reference to the information to be set forth in the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled "Transactions with Related Persons" and "Information Regarding the Board of Directors and
Corporate Governance."

ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item regarding principal accounting fees and services is incorporated by reference to the information
to be set forth in the section of the Proxy Statement entitled "Proposal 2Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants."

64

---





Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)   The following documents are being filed as part of this report:





Incorporated by ReferenceExhibit
No.

Description

Form

Filing
Date

Number

Filed
Herewith3.01

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

8-K


7/20/2009


3.13.02

Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.

8-K


7/20/2009


3.23.03

Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

8-K


7/20/2009


3.33.04

Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.

8-K


7/20/2009


3.43.05

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Allos Therapeutics, Inc.

8-K


6/25/2007


3.044.01

Form of Common Stock Certificate.

S-1/A


3/17/2000


4.014.02

Reference is made to Exhibits 3.01, 3.02, 3.03 and 3.04.4.03

Rights Agreement dated May 6, 2003 between Allos and Mellon Investor Services LLC.

8-K


5/9/2003


99.24.04

Form of Rights Certificate.

8-K


5/9/2003


99.34.05

Amendment to Rights Agreement dated March 4, 2005 between Allos and Mellon Investor Services LLC.

8-K


3/4/2005


4.064.06

Amendment to Rights Agreement dated January 29, 2007 between Allos and Mellon Investor Services LLC.

8-K


1/30/2007


4.14.07

Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2009, between the Company and Mellon Investor Services LLC.

8-K


7/20/2009


4.110.01

Form of Amended and Restated Indemnity Agreement between Allos and each of its directors and officers.

8-K


6/25/2007


10.01


65

---



Table of Contents

Incorporated by ReferenceExhibit
No.

Description

Form

Filing
Date

Number

Filed
Herewith10.02

1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended.

S-1


1/26/2000


10.1110.03

2000 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended.

8-K


12/22/2005


10.110.03.1

Form of Incentive Stock Option Letter Agreement under 2000 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan.

8-K


2/11/2005


99.110.03.2

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Letter Agreement under 2000 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan.

8-K


2/11/2005


99.210.03.3

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Letter Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under 2000 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan.

8-K


2/24/2006


10.110.04

2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and form of Offering.

10-K


3/7/2001


10.2610.04.1

2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan Offering (Series Beginning July 1, 2007).

8-K


6/25/2007


10.12.110.05
*
Office Lease dated April 4, 2001 between Allos and Catellus Development Corporation.

10-Q


8/14/2001


10.2710.05.1
*
Amended and Restated Second Amendment to Lease dated December 9, 2002 between Allos and Catellus Development Corporation.

10-K


3/28/2003


10.27.110.05.2
*
Third Amendment to Lease dated November 28, 2003 between Allos and Catellus Development Corporation.

10-K


3/5/2004


10.27.210.05.3
*
Fifth Amendment to Office Lease Agreement dated June 16, 2008 between Allos and Circle Point Properties, LLC.

10-Q


8/5/2008


10.5.310.06

Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 2, 2005 between Allos and the Investors listed on the signature pages thereto.

8-K/A


3/10/2005


10.4110.07

Registration Rights Agreement dated March 4, 2005 between Allos and the Investors listed on Schedule I thereto.

8-K/A


3/10/2005


10.4210.08

Letter Agreement dated March 4, 2005 among Allos, Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus & Co. and Warburg Pincus LLC.

8-K


3/4/2005


10.4310.09

Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors.

10-Q


8/4/2009


10.110.10

Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated March 9, 2006 between Allos and Paul L. Berns.

8-K


3/14/2006


10.210.11

2006 Inducement Award Plan, including forms of Stock Option Grant Notice with Stock Option Agreement and Restricted Stock Grant Notice with Restricted Stock Grant Agreement.

8-K


6/6/2006


10.1


66

---



Table of Contents

Incorporated by ReferenceExhibit
No.

Description

Form

Filing
Date

Number

Filed
Herewith10.12

Letter agreement dated January 28, 2007 among Allos, Baker Bros. Investments, L.P., Baker Bros. Investments II, L.P., Baker/Tisch Investments, L.P., Baker Biotech Fund I, L.P., 14159, L.P.
and Baker Brothers Life Sciences, L.P.

8-K


1/30/2007


10.110.13
*
License Agreement for 10-Propargyl-10-Deazaaminopterin "PDX" dated December 23, 2002 and amended May 9, 2006 between Allos and SRI International, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research and Southern
Research Institute.









X10.13.1
*
Second Amendment to License Agreement for 10-Propargyl-10-Deazaaminopterin "PDX" dated November 6, 2007 between Allos and SRI International, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research and Southern Research
Institute.

10-K


2/27/2008


10.18.1

X10.14

Corporate Bonus Plan, as amended and restated effective September 15, 2008.

10-Q


11/5/2008


10.110.15

Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective December 13, 2007, between Allos and Paul L. Berns.

10-K


2/27/2008


10.2010.15.1

First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2009, between Allos and Paul L. Berns.

8-K


5/22/2009


10.110.16

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective December 13, 2007, between Allos and James V. Caruso.

10-K


2/27/2008


10.2210.16.1

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2009, between Allos and James V. Caruso.

8-K


5/22/2009


10.310.17

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective December 13, 2007, between Allos and Marc H. Graboyes.

10-K


2/27/2008


10.2310.17.1

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2009, between Allos and Marc H. Graboyes.

8-K


5/22/2009


10.410.18

Letter agreement, effective January 22, 2008, between Allos and Bruce K. Bennett.

10-K


2/27/2008


10.2410.19

Executive Compensation and Equity Awards.

8-K


2/26/2010


10.110.20

Allos Therapeutics, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended.

8-K


6/26/2009


10.210.20.1

Form of Option Grant Notice and Agreement under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

S-8


6/24/2008


99.2


67

---



Table of Contents

Incorporated by ReferenceExhibit
No.

Description

Form

Filing
Date

Number

Filed
Herewith10.20.2

Form of Restricted Stock Award Grant Notice and Agreement under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

S-8


6/24/2008


99.310.20.3

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Agreement under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

8-K


2/27/2009


10.210.21

Allos Therapeutics, Inc. Severance Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective December 11, 2007.

8-K


2/27/2009


10.310.21.1

Allos Therapeutics, Inc. Change in Control Severance Benefit Schedule, as amended and restated effective February 23, 2008.

8-K


2/27/2009


10.410.21.2

Allos Therapeutics, Inc. Amendment No. 1 to Change in Control Severance Benefit Schedule, adopted May 19, 2009.

8-K


5/22/2009


10.510.22

Employment Agreement, effective June 25, 2009, between the Company and David C. Clark.

8-K


6/26/2009


10.123.01

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.









X24.01

Power of Attorney (included on signature page hereto).









X31.01

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.









X31.02

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.









X32.01
#
Section 1350 Certification.









X


Indicates
management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of
Form 10-K.*Indicates
confidential treatment has been granted with respect to specific portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.#The
certifications attached as Exhibit 32.01 that accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.


68

---





Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.Date: March 1, 2010

By:

/s/ PAUL L. BERNS Paul L. Berns President and Chief Executive Officer


POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Paul L. Berns and David
C. Clark, and each of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and all other documents in connection therewith, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, and any of them or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant
on March 1, 2010, and in the capacities indicated:

Name

Title/s/ STEPHEN J. HOFFMAN Stephen J. Hoffman

Chairman of Board of Directors and Director/s/ PAUL L. BERNS Paul L. Berns

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ DAVID C. CLARK David C. Clark

Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)/s/ STEWART HEN Stewart Hen

Director/s/ JEFFREY R. LATTS Jeffrey R. Latts

Director/s/ JONATHAN S. LEFF Jonathan S. Leff

Director/s/ TIMOTHY P. LYNCH Timothy P. Lynch

Director/s/ DAVID M. STOUT David M. Stout

Director


69

---





Table of Contents

Allos Therapeutics, Inc.    Index to Financial Statements



PageReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2Balance Sheets

F-3Statements of Operations

F-4Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

F-5Statements of Cash Flows

F-6Notes to Financial Statements

F-7


F-1

---





Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Allos Therapeutics, Inc.:

In
our opinion, the accompanying balance sheets and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established inInternal ControlIntegrated
Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting, appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial
statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A
company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 1, 2010

F-2

---





Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.        BALANCE SHEETS        (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

December 31,2009

2008ASSETSCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
141,185

$
30,459Investments in marketable securities


17,016


53,469Restricted cash


238


238Accounts receivable


4,862


Inventory


36


Prepaid expenses and other assets


3,808


3,691Total current assets


167,145


87,857Property and equipment, net


2,169


1,307Investments in marketable securities


343


39Intangible asset, net


5,679


Other assets


48


137Total assets

$
175,384

$
89,340LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCurrent liabilities:Trade accounts payable

$
2,035

$
280Deferred revenue


669


Accrued liabilities


13,136


9,596Total current liabilities


15,840


9,876Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)Stockholders' equity:Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding





Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value; 1,500,000 and 1,000,000 shares designated from authorized preferred stock at
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively; no shares issued or outstanding





Common stock, $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 104,234,409 and 81,238,812 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively


104


81Additional paid-in capital


532,652


379,042Accumulated deficit


(373,212
)

(299,659
)Total stockholders' equity


159,544


79,464Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$
175,384

$
89,340


The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

---





Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.        STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS        (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Years Ended December 31,2009

2008

2007Net product sales

$
3,585

$


$
Operating costs and expenses:Cost of sales, excluding amortization expense


408





Research and development


32,618


30,595


22,992Selling, general and administrative


44,448


23,044


19,672Amortization of intangible asset


121





Total operating costs and expenses


77,595


53,639


42,664Operating loss


(74,010
)

(53,639
)

(42,664
)Interest and other income, net


380


1,909


3,294Loss before income taxes


(73,630
)

(51,730
)

(39,370
)Income tax benefit


77





Net loss

$
(73,553
)
$
(51,730
)
$
(39,370
)Net loss per share: basic and diluted

$
(0.81
)
$
(0.69
)
$
(0.60
)Weighted average shares: basic and diluted


90,469,720


75,399,774


65,188,913


The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

---





Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.        STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Common StockAdditional
Paid-in
Capital

Accumulated
Deficit

Total
Stockholders'
EquityShares

AmountBalance at December 31, 2006


56,695,633

$
57

$
238,052

$
(208,559
)
$
29,550Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options for cash at $.40-$6.38 per share


1,156,471


1


3,696





3,697Issuance of common stock upon exercise of purchase rights at an exercise price of $1.82-$3.89 per share


41,148





125





125Issuance of common stock upon net exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $3.14 per share


112,106











Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants for cash at an exercise price of $3.14 per share


531,585


1


1,668





1,669Issuance of common stock net of offering costs of $3,743, at $6.00 per share


9,000,000


9


50,248





50,257Issuance of restricted stock


105,000











Stock compensation expense








6,651





6,651Net loss











(39,370
)

(39,370
)Balance at December 31, 2007


67,641,943


68


300,440


(247,929
)

52,579Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options for cash at $2.06-$8.75 per share


1,144,041


1


5,290





5,291Issuance of common stock upon exercise of purchase rights at an exercise price of $5.18 and $5.20 per share


22,828





119





119Issuance of common stock net of offering costs of $4,864 at $5.64 per share


12,420,000


12


65,173





65,185Issuance of restricted stock


10,000











Stock compensation expense








8,020





8,020Net loss











(51,730
)

(51,730
)Balance at December 31, 2008


81,238,812


81


379,042


(299,659
)

79,464Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options for cash at $2.00-$6.17 per share


1,241,034


1


4,682





4,683Issuance of common stock upon exercise of purchase rights at an exercise price of $5.16 and $5.59 per share


42,063





229





229Issuance of common stock in October 2009, net of offering costs of $6,316, at $7.10 per share


14,000,000


14


93,070





93,084Issuance of common stock in April 2009, net of offering costs of $1,868, at $6.30 per share


7,750,000


8


46,949





46,957Forfeiture of restricted stock


(37,500
)










Stock compensation expense








8,680





8,680Net loss











(73,553
)

(73,553
)Balance at December 31, 2009


104,234,409

$
104

$
532,652

$
(373,212
)
$
159,544


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

---





Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.        STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS        (Dollars in thousands)

Years Ended December 31,2009

2008

2007Cash Flows From Operating Activities:Net loss

$
(73,553
)
$
(51,730
)
$
(39,370
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:Depreciation and amortization


462


393


361Stock-based compensation expense


8,680


8,020


6,651Amortization of intangible asset


121





Realized loss on sale of marketable securities


157


552


Loss on disposal of property and equipment


152


19


Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts receivable


(4,193
)




Prepaid expenses and other long-term assets


25


(930
)

(284
)Interest receivable on investments


806


(168
)

(231
)Trade accounts payable


1,692


(911
)

792Accrued liabilities


3,452


1,905


1,258Net cash used in operating activities


(62,199
)

(42,850
)

(30,823
)Cash Flows From Investing Activities:Acquisition of property and equipment


(1,414
)

(1,097
)

(379
)(Pledge) release of restricted cash





(54
)

183Cash paid for license


(5,800
)




Purchases of marketable securities


(18,208
)

(93,938
)

(89,014
)Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities


49,500


75,136


70,134Proceeds from sales of marketable securities


3,894


6,747


Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities


27,972


(13,206
)

(19,076
)Cash Flows From Financing Activities:Proceeds from issuance of common stock associated with stock options, stock warrants and employee stock purchase plan


4,912


5,410


5,491Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs


140,041


65,185


50,257Net cash provided by financing activities


144,953


70,595


55,748Net increase in cash and cash equivalents


110,726


14,539


5,849Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period


30,459


15,920


10,071Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$
141,185

$
30,459

$
15,920Supplemental Schedule of Cash and Non-cash Operating and Financing Activities:Tax refunds received

$
77

$


$
Deferred revenue in accounts receivable

$
669

$


$
Assets recorded for which payment has not yet occurred

$
152

$


$



The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

---





Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.        NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS        (Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this report to "Allos," the "Company," "we," "us" and "our" refer to Allos Therapeutics, Inc.

1. Formation and Business of the Company

We are a biopharmaceutical company committed to the development and commercialization of innovative anti-cancer therapeutics. Our goal is to build a profitable company by
generating income from products we develop and commercialize, either alone or with one or more potential strategic partners. We strive to develop proprietary products that have the potential to
improve the standard of care in cancer therapy.

We
are currently focused on the development and commercialization of FOLOTYN (pralatrexate injection). FOLOTYN is a targeted antifolate inhibitor designed to accumulate
preferentially in cancer cells. FOLOTYN targets the inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase, or DHFR, an enzyme critical to DNA and RNA synthesis and tumor growth, which triggers cancer cell death.
FOLOTYN can be delivered as a single agent, for which we currently have approval for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma, or PTCL, and has the
potential to be used in combination therapy regimens. We believe that FOLOTYN's unique mechanism of action offers us the ability to target the drug for development in a variety of hematological
malignancies and solid tumor indications. We currently retain exclusive worldwide
commercial rights to FOLOTYN for all indications. We may also seek to grow our product portfolio through product acquisition and in-licensing efforts.

On
September 24, 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, granted accelerated approval of FOLOTYN for use as a single agent for the treatment of patients with relapsed
or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma, or PTCL. This approval was based on overall response rate from our pivotal PROPEL trial. Clinical benefit such as improvement in
progression-free survival or overall survival has not been demonstrated. FOLOTYN represents our first drug approved for marketing in the United States. FOLOTYN is the first and only drug
approved by the FDA for this indication and represents a new treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL.

In
addition to relapsed or refractory PTCL, we are currently evaluating FOLOTYN in a number of oncology indications, including cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, or CTCL,
B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, non-small cell lung cancer, or NSCLC, and advanced or metastatic relapsed transitional cell carcinoma, or TCC, of the urinary
bladder, which may or may not lead to obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals to market FOLOTYN for additional indications.

As
of December 31, 2009, we had $158.5 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments in marketable securities. Based upon the current status of our product development
plans, we believe that our cash, cash equivalents, and investments in marketable securities as of December 31, 2009 should be adequate to support our operations through at least the next
12 months, although there can be no assurance that this can, in fact, be accomplished.

Our
ability to generate revenue and achieve profitability is dependent on our ability to successfully commercialize FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL
in the United States. The amount of our future product sales are subject to significant uncertainty. We may never generate significant revenue from product sales or become profitable.

We
expect to continue to spend substantial amounts on research and development, including amounts spent on conducting clinical trials and seeking additional regulatory approvals for
FOLOTYN. We also expect to continue to spend substantial amounts on selling, general and administrative

F-7

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

1. Formation and Business of the Company (Continued)

expenses
in order to commercialize FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. Therefore, we may need to raise additional capital to support our future operations. Our
actual capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:



We
may seek to obtain this additional capital through equity or debt financings, arrangements with corporate partners, or from other sources. Such financings or arrangements, if
successfully consummated, may be dilutive to our existing stockholders. However, there is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed, or that, if available, we will obtain
such financing on terms that are favorable to our stockholders or us. In the event that additional funds are obtained through arrangements with collaborative partners or other sources, such
arrangements may require us to relinquish rights to some of our technologies, product candidates or products under development, which we might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize ourselves, on
terms that are less favorable than might otherwise be available. If we are unable to generate meaningful amounts of revenue from future product sales or cannot otherwise raise sufficient additional
funds to support our operations, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more of our development programs and our business and future prospects for revenue and
profitability may be harmed.

We
incorporated in the Commonwealth of Virginia on September 1, 1992 as HemoTech Sciences, Inc. and filed amended Articles of Incorporation to change our name to Allos
Therapeutics, Inc. on October 19, 1994. We reincorporated in Delaware on October 28, 1996. Our primary business activities have been focused on the development of FOLOTYN and
programs which have been discontinued. We operate as a single business segment.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

On September 24, 2009, the FDA granted accelerated approval of FOLOTYN for use as a single agent for the treatment of patients
with relapsed or refractory PTCL. FOLOTYN represents our first drug approved for marketing in the United States. We began making FOLOTYN available for

F-8

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

commercial
sale in the United States on October 5, 2009. Accordingly, we have commenced our planned principal operations and are no longer considered to be in the development stage as of year
end 2009.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amount of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

On August 22, 2008, $238,000 of cash was pledged as collateral on a letter of credit related to a lease for administrative
office space and was classified as restricted cash on the Balance Sheet.

Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets

Prepaid expenses and other assets are comprised of the following:

December 31,
2009

December 31,
2008Prepaid sales, marketing and medical affairs expenses

$
1,839

$
175Prepaid expenses and other assets


1,251


597Prepaid research and development expenses


718


919Receivable and cash in escrow related to litigation settlement (see Note 9)





2,000$
3,808

$
3,691


Research
and development expenditures are charged to expense as incurred. In accordance with certain research and development agreements, we are obligated to make certain upfront
payments upon execution of the agreement. We record these upfront payments as prepaid research and development expenses. Such payments are recorded to research and development expense as services are
performed. We evaluate on a quarterly basis whether events and circumstances have occurred that may indicate impairment of remaining prepaid research and development expenses.

F-9

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Inventory

Costs associated with the production of FOLOTYN bulk drug substance and formulated drug product by our third party manufacturers are
recorded as either research and development expense or inventory.

Costs
associated with the production of FOLOTYN by our third party manufacturers are expensed to research and development expense at the time of production
when:



If
and when we receive the related regulatory approval, we would then capitalize those manufacturing costs for our marketed products at the lower of cost (first-in,
first-out method) or market (current replacement cost) with cost determined on the first-in, first-out basis and then expense the sold inventory as a component of
cost of goods sold.

Prior
to receiving FDA approval of FOLOTYN, all costs related to purchases of the active pharmaceutical ingredient and the manufacturing of the product were recorded as research and
development expense. As such, we have established supplies of drug substance and drug product that are not recorded on our balance sheet as inventory. Inventory as of December 31, 2009 consists
of work in process for FOLOTYN of $36,000. Until we sell the inventory for which the costs were previously expensed, our cost of product sales will reflect only incremental costs incurred subsequent
to FDA approval. We continue to expense costs associated with clinical trial material as research and development expense.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives.
Depreciation expense was $462,000, $393,000 and $361,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

F-10

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The
components of property and equipment are as follows:

December 31,Estimated
Lives2009

2008Computer hardware and software

$
2,027

$
1,752

3 yearsOffice furniture and equipment


1,628


1,682

5-7 yearsLeasehold improvements


498


417

Lease termLab equipment





29

5 yearsSoftware projects in process


601


3294,754


4,209Less accumulated depreciation and amortization


(2,585
)

(2,902
)Property and equipment, net

$
2,169

$
1,307


Long-lived Assets

We review long-lived assets, including acquired technology and product rights and property and equipment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparison of the assets' book value to future net undiscounted cash flows the
assets are expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the book value of the assets exceed their fair value,
which is measured based on the projected discounted future net cash flows arising from the assets. Fair value of our long-lived assets is determined using the expected cash flows
discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Assumptions and estimates used in the evaluation of impairment may affect the carrying value of long-lived assets, which could
result in impairment charges in future periods.

We
believe that the future cash flows to be received from our long-lived assets will exceed the assets' carrying value, and accordingly have not recorded any impairment
losses through December 31, 2009. Our impairment assessment could be impacted by various factors including a more than insignificant disruption of supply, new competing products or technologies
that could result in a significant decrease in the demand for or the pricing of our products, regulatory actions that require us to restrict or cease promotion of the products, a product recall to
address regulatory issues, and/or patent claims by third parties.

F-11

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Accrued liabilities

Accrued liabilities are comprised of the following:

December 31,
2009

December 31,
2008Accrued personnel costs

$
5,133

$
2,817Accrued sales and marketing expenses


2,407


695Accrued research and development expenses


3,363


3,425Accrued royalties, government rebates, chargebacks and distribution fees


963


Accrued litigation settlement costs (see Note 9)





2,000Accrued expensesother


1,270


659$
13,136

$
9,596


Operating Leases

We recognize lease expense on a straight-line basis over the initial lease term. For leases that contain rent holidays,
escalation clauses or tenant improvement allowances, we recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis and record the difference between the rent expense and rental amount payable as
deferred rent. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had $243,000 and $82,000, respectively, of deferred rent in accrued liabilities.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Accordingly, we use valuation
techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1:

Inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to us for identical assets or liabilities;Level 2:

Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active and inactive markets or that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; andLevel 3:

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.


We
have no assets or liabilities that were measured using quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities or significant unobservable inputs (Level 2 and Level 3 assets
and liabilities, respectively) as of December 31, 2009. Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses,
accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The carrying amounts of financial instruments approximate their fair value due to their short

F-12

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

maturities.
The carrying value of our cash held in money market funds totaling $139.5 million as of December 31, 2009 is included in cash and cash equivalents on our Balance Sheet and
approximates market values based on quoted market prices, or Level 1 inputs.

See
Note 3"Marketable Securities" for additional details regarding our investments.

Product Sales

We generate revenue from product sales. We recognize product revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. Revenue is realized
or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
(3) our price to the buyer is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue from sales transactions where the buyer has the right to return the product is
recognized at the time of sale only if (1) our price to the buyer is substantially fixed or determinable at the date of sale, (2) the buyer has paid us, or the buyer is obligated to pay
us and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product, (3) the buyer's obligation to us would not be changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product,
(4) the buyer acquiring the product for resale has economic substance apart from that provided by us, (5) we do not have significant obligations for future performance to directly bring
about resale of the product by the buyer, and (6) the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated.

Given
our limited sales history, we are unable to estimate returns. Therefore, we have determined that domestic shipments of FOLOTYN made to distributors do not meet the criteria for
revenue recognition at the time of shipment, and therefore such shipments are accounted for using the sell-through method. Under the sell-through method, we do not
recognize revenue upon shipment of FOLOTYN to the distributor. For these product sales, we invoice the distributor and record deferred revenue equal to the gross invoice sales price. We then recognize
revenue when the product is sold through, or upon shipment of the product from the distributors to the distributors' customers. Because of the price of FOLOTYN, the limited number of patients, the
short period from sale of product to patient infusion and limited contractual return rights, FOLOTYN distributors and their customers generally carry limited inventory. Through December 31,
2009, we have had no refunds or returns. Deferred revenue results from amounts receivable in advance of revenue recognition.

We
estimate sell-through revenue and certain gross to net sales adjustments based upon analysis of third-party information, including information obtained from certain
distributors with respect to their inventory levels and sell-through to the distributors' customers. Our estimates are subject to the inherent limitations of estimates that rely on
third-party data. The information received from distributors is a product of their record-keeping process and their internal controls surrounding such processes. Our sales and revenue recognition
under the sell-through method reflect our estimate of actual product sold through the distribution channel.

Net Product Sales

Our net product sales represent total sell-through revenue less estimated allowances for rebates and chargebacks to be
incurred on the selling price of FOLOTYN related to the respective revenue. In addition, we incur certain distributor fees related to the management of our product by distributors.

F-13

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

These
distributor fees are recorded within net revenues and are known at the time of sale. Due to estimates and assumptions inherent in determining the amount of rebates and chargebacks, the actual
amount of claims for rebates and chargebacks may be different from our estimates, at which time we would adjust our reserves accordingly. Product sales allowances and accruals are based on definitive
contractual agreements or legal requirements (such as Medicaid laws and regulations) related to the purchase and/or utilization of the product by these entities. Allowances and accruals are generally
recorded in the same period that the related revenue is recognized.

Classification of Product Sales Allowances and Accruals

Accruals related to Medicaid rebates, government chargebacks and distributor fees are recognized at the time sell-through
revenue is recorded, resulting in a reduction in product sales revenue and the recording of an increase in accrued expenses.

Medicaid Rebates

Our product is subject to state government-managed Medicaid programs whereby discounts and rebates are provided to participating state
governments. We record estimated rebates payable under governmental programs, including Medicaid, as a reduction of revenue at the time sell-through revenues are recorded. Our calculations
related to these rebate accruals require estimates, including estimates of customer mix primarily based on a combination of market and clinical research, to determine which sales will be subject to
rebates and the amount of such rebates. Given our lack of historical sales data, we utilized this research to estimate what we believe is the high end of potential Medicaid utilization of 64% of our
sales not already subject to Government Chargebacks, discussed below. We also consider any legal interpretations of the applicable laws related to Medicaid and qualifying federal and state government
programs and any new information regarding changes in the Medicaid programs' regulations and guidelines that would impact the amount of the rebates. In addition, because of the inherent difficulties
of predicting the impact on our estimates and assumptions of state Medicaid programs and regulations, we are unable to quantify an estimate of the reasonably likely effect of any such changes on our
results of operations or financial position. We update our estimates and assumptions each period and record any necessary adjustments to our reserves. Although allowances and accruals are recorded at
the time of product sale, certain rebates are typically paid out, on average, up to six months or longer after the sale. We account for Medicaid rebates by establishing an accrual in an amount equal
to our estimate of Medicaid rebate claims attributable to sales recognized in that period. If actual future results vary from our estimates, we may need to adjust our previous estimates, which would
affect our earnings in the period of the adjustment. For reference purposes, a 10% to 20% variance to our estimated allowance for state Medicaid rebates as of December 31, 2009 would result in
an approximate $39,000 to $78,000 adjustment to net product sales.

Government Chargebacks

Our products are subject to certain programs with federal government qualified entities whereby pricing on products is discounted below
distributor list price to participating entities. These entities purchase products through distributors at the discounted price, and the distributors charge the difference between their acquisition
cost and the discounted price back to us. We account for

F-14

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

chargebacks
by establishing an accrual in an amount equal to our estimate of maximum chargeback claims. We determine our chargeback estimates based on actual FOLOTYN sell-through sales
data from third-party information. Chargeback amounts are determined at the time of resale to the federal government qualified entities, and we generally issue credits for such amounts within several
weeks of receiving claims from the distributor. Estimated chargeback amounts are recorded at the time the sell-through sale occurs and we adjust the accrual quarterly to reflect actual
experience. Due to estimates and assumptions inherent in determining the amount of government chargebacks, the actual amount of claims for chargebacks may be different from our estimates, at which
time we would adjust our reserves accordingly.

Balances
and activity in the deferred revenue account and a reconciliation of gross to net product sales for the year ended December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Years Ended
December 31,2009

2008

2007Gross product sales to distributors

$
4,875

$


$
Less: Gross product sales recognized


(4,206
)




Deferred revenue

$
669

$


$
Gross product sales

$
4,206

$


$
Less: Gross to Net Sales AdjustmentsGovernment rebates and chargebacks


(501
)




Distribution fees


(120
)




Net product sales

$
3,585

$


$



Balances
and activity in the government rebates and chargebacks payable accounts for the year ended December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Government
Rebates and
Chargebacks

Distribution
FeesBalance at December 31, 2008

$


$
Reserve for sales


501


120Credits made for sales/payments


(14
)

(34
)Balance at December 31, 2009

$
487

$
86


F-15

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Major Customers and Concentration of Credit Risk

We sell FOLOTYN to a limited number of pharmaceutical wholesale distributors, or distributors, all of which are affiliates under common
control, without requiring collateral. We periodically assess the financial strength of these customers and establish allowances for anticipated losses, if necessary. All of our 2009 sales were made
in the United States.

% of total trade
accounts
receivable at
December 31,
2009

% of total gross
product sales for the
year ended
December 31,
2009Customer A


47.6
%

51.0
%Customer B


30.6
%

30.0
%Customer C


21.8
%

19.0
%100.0
%

100.0
%


Cost of sales

Cost of sales, excluding amortization expense, includes royalties, inventory packaging and labeling, warehousing and shipping costs
associated with FOLOTYN product revenue. See discussion in Note 9 regarding our FOLOTYN license and royalty rates. Prior to receiving FDA approval of FOLOTYN, all costs related to purchases of
the active pharmaceutical ingredient and the manufacturing of the product were recorded as research and development expense.

Under
the sell-through method, royalties paid to our licensors of FOLOTYN based on the unit shipments to distributors are deferred and recognized as royalty expense when
those units are sold through and recognized as revenue. Royalties paid are deferred as we have the right to offset royalties paid for product that are later returned against subsequent royalty
obligations.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our statement of
operations. Advertising costs, including promotional expenses and costs related to trade shows were $4.7 million, $1.4 million and $730,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.

F-16

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Stock-Based Compensation

We have several stock-based compensation plans under which incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock
units and restricted shares may be granted, and an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP). We measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the
grant date fair value of the award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, the requisite service period (usually
the vesting period). We provide an estimate of forfeitures at initial grant date.

See
Note 5"Stock-Based Compensation Plans" for additional details regarding the impact of our stock based compensation plans on our financial statements.

Research and Development

Research and development expenditures are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development expenses include the costs of
certain personnel, preclinical studies, clinical trials, regulatory affairs, biostatistical data analysis, third party manufacturing costs for development of drug materials for use in clinical trials
and preclinical studies and licensing fees for our product candidates prior to FDA approval. All finished drug inventory costs associated with production activities in our third party manufacturing
facilities prior to receiving FDA approval for such facilities and prior to receiving regulatory approval to market our product are expensed to research and development expenses. Upon receipt of the
related regulatory approval, we capitalize those manufacturing costs for our marketed products at the lower of cost or market and then expense the sold inventory as a component of cost of sales. We
accrue research and development expenses for activity as incurred during the fiscal year and prior to receiving invoices from clinical sites and third party clinical and preclinical research
organizations. We accrue external costs for clinical and preclinical studies based on an evaluation of the following: the progress of the studies, including patient enrollment, dosing levels of
patients enrolled, estimated costs to dose patients, invoices received, and contracted costs with clinical sites and third party clinical and preclinical research organizations. Significant judgments
and estimates must be made and used in determining the accrued balance in any accounting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007, we did not have any changes in estimates that would have resulted in material adjustments to research and development expenses accrued in the prior period.

Income Taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities at each year end and their respective tax bases using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are
expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances have been established to reduce our deferred tax assets to zero, as we believe that it is more likely than not that such assets will not be
realized.

F-17

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by giving effect to all dilutive potential common stock outstanding during the period, including
stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock unit awards and shares to be issued under our employee stock purchase plan.

Diluted
net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share for all periods presented because any potential dilutive common shares were anti-dilutive due to our net
loss (as including such shares would decrease our basic net loss per share). Such potentially dilutive shares are excluded when the effect would be to reduce net loss per share. Because we reported a
net loss for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, all potentially dilutive common shares have been excluded from the computation of the dilutive net loss per share for all periods
presented. Such potentially dilutive common shares consist of the following:

Years Ended December 31,2009

2008

2007Common stock options


8,292,496


7,236,512


6,405,430Unvested restricted stock


125,000


293,750


412,500Unvested restricted stock units


155,479





8,572,975


7,530,262


6,817,930


Reclassifications

Clinical manufacturing expense has been reclassified to be included with research and development expenses. Prior year amounts have
been made to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on our total assets, liabilities, stockholders' equity, net loss or cash flows.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that eliminates the exemption from consolidation for qualifying special-purpose
entities, effective for financial asset transfers occurring after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. We currently do not have any of these
entities.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that assists in determining whether an enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This guidance is
effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. We currently do not have any such arrangements.

In
October 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that provides principles for allocation of consideration among an
arrangement's multiple-elements, allowing more flexibility in identifying and accounting for separate deliverables. The guidance introduces an estimated selling price method for valuing the elements
of a bundled

F-18

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

arrangement
if vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price is not available, and significantly expands related disclosure requirements. This guidance is effective on a
prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Alternatively, adoption may be on a retrospective basis, and
early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on our financial statements.

3. Investments in Marketable Securities

We do not intend to sell and we do not believe that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell our investments before recovering the cost of securities, nor do we expect
not to recover the entire amortized cost basis of our investments in marketable securities. As such, our investments in marketable securities as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are classified as
held-to-maturity and are carried at cost plus accrued interest. The changes in the value of these securities, other than impairment charges, are not reported on our financial
statements. The weighted average duration of the remaining time to maturity for our portfolio of investments in marketable securities as of December 31, 2009 was approximately two months. All
of the investments classified as short-term on the balance sheet have an original maturity of longer than 90 days, but less than one year. The investments classified as
long-term on the balance sheet have remaining contractual maturities of greater than one year and less than three years as of the balance sheet date.

The
carrying value of investments in marketable securities by contractual maturity, consisted of the following as of December 31, 2009:

Amortized
cost

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

Fair
ValueShort-term held-to-maturity securities:U.S. Treasury bills

$
8,006

$
11

$


$
8,017Certificates of deposit


9,010


5





9,015Total due in one year or less

$
17,016

$
16

$


$
17,032Long-term held-to-maturity securities:U. S. Government agency securities

$
273

$
11

$


$
284Corporate notes


308


13





321Sub-total

$
581

$
24

$


$
605Less: Amounts classified as restricted cash


(238
)







(238
)Total due in one to three years

$
343

$
24

$


$
367


F-19

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

3. Investments in Marketable Securities (Continued)

The
carrying value of marketable securities by contractual maturity, consisted of the following as of December 31, 2008:

Amortized
cost

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

Fair
ValueShort-term held-to-maturity securities:U.S. Government agency securities

$
10,145

$
9

$


$
10,154Corporate notes


43,324


23


(459
)

42,888Total due in one year or less

$
53,469

$
32

$
(459
)
$
53,042Long-term held-to-maturity securities:U. S. Government agency securities

$
277

$
13

$


$
290Less: Amounts classified as restricted cash


(238
)







(238
)Total due in one to three years

$
39

$
13

$


$
52


There
were no investments in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2009. All of the investments as of December 31, 2008 that were in a loss position, have been in
a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months. Market values were determined for each individual security in the investment portfolio. If a decline in fair value below the
amortized cost basis of an investment is judged to be other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the investment is written down to fair value. Additionally, management assesses
whether it intends to sell or would more-likely-than-not not be required to sell the investment before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. Management
has asserted that it has no intent to sell and that it believes it is more-likely-than-not that it will not be required to sell the investment before recovery of
its amortized cost basis. As of December 31, 2009, no other than temporary impairment has been recorded on any of our marketable securities. The decline in value of the investments as of
December 31, 2008 was caused by instability in the global financial markets, lack of liquidity in the credit and capital markets, changes in interest rates and other factors. During the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we realized losses of approximately $157,000 and $552,000, respectively, on the sale of certain of our investments in marketable securities, which were sold in
order to preserve our principal as the issuers of these securities experienced significant deteriorations in their creditworthiness as evidenced by investment rating downgrades. All of the remaining
investments in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2008 were held to maturity for full recovery of the amortized cost basis. We have the ability and intent to hold our remaining
investments in marketable securities to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the investments as of December 31, 2009.

4. Stockholders' Equity

Common Stock

2007 Common Stock Financing

On February 2, 2007, we sold 9,000,000 shares of our common stock in an underwritten offering at a price of $6.00 per share, or
the February 2007 Financing. We received net proceeds from the offering

F-20

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

4. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

of
$50,257,000, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $3,240,000 and $503,000 of offering expenses.

Baker
Brothers Life Sciences, L.P. and certain other affiliated funds, collectively Baker, purchased 3,300,000 shares of common stock in the February 2007 Financing. As a result
of such purchase, Baker held in excess of 15% of our outstanding common stock following the closing of the February 2007 Financing. In connection with the February 2007 Financing, Baker entered into a
standstill agreement with the Company, agreeing not to pursue, for four years, certain activities the purpose or effect of which may be to change or influence control of the Company.

2008 Common Stock Financing

On May 29, 2008, we sold 12,420,000 shares of our common stock in an underwritten public offering at a price of $5.64 per share.
The number of shares issued included 1,620,000 shares purchased by the underwriters pursuant to their exercise in full of their overallotment option. We received net proceeds from the offering of
$65,185,000, after deducting $4,203,000 of underwriting discounts and commissions and $661,000 of offering expenses.

2009 Common Stock Financings

On April 3, 2009, we sold 7,750,000 shares of our common stock in an underwritten public offering at a price of $6.30 per share.
We received net proceeds from the offering of $46,957,000, after deducting $1.4 million of underwriting commissions and $473,000 of offering expenses.

On
October 13, 2009, we sold 14,000,000 shares of our common stock in an underwritten public offering at a price of $7.10 per share. We received net proceeds from the offering of
$93,084,000, after deducting $5.7 million of underwriting commissions and $600,000 of estimated offering expenses.

Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance

At December 31, 2009, we have reserved shares of common stock for future issuance as follows:

Outstanding at
December 31,
2009

Available for
grant at
December 31,
2009

Shares of
Common Stock
Reserved at
December 31,
20091995 Stock Option Plan


253,708





253,7082001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan





2,217,714


2,217,7142008 Equity Incentive Plan


8,194,267


8,427,287


16,621,554Total for Equity Incentive Plans


8,447,975


10,645,001


19,092,976


Stock Warrants

In November 2003, in conjunction with the private placement of 5,172,412 shares of common stock to various purchasers, we issued
warrants to purchase 1,706,893 shares of common stock at an exercise

F-21

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

4. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

price
of $3.14 per share with a life of four years. There were 748,187 of these warrants exercised during 2007. As of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, no warrants remained outstanding.

Stockholder Rights Plan

In May 2003, we designated 1,000,000 shares of our authorized Preferred Stock as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock,
par value $0.001 per share, pursuant to a Stockholder Rights Plan approved by our Board of Directors under which all stockholders of record as of May 28, 2003 received a dividend distribution
of one preferred share purchase right, or a Right, for each outstanding share of our common stock. The Rights trade with the common stock and no separate Right certificates will be distributed until
such time as the Rights become exercisable in accordance with the Stockholder Rights Plan. The Stockholder Rights Plan is intended as a means to guard against abusive takeover tactics and to provide
for fair and equal treatment for all stockholders in the event that an unsolicited attempt is made to acquire us.

On
July 17, 2009, we filed with the Delaware Secretary of State a Certificate of Amendment to our Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock to increase the number of shares designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock thereunder from 1,000,000 shares to 1,500,000 shares. In accordance with the terms of our
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, our Board of Directors has the authority to increase the number of shares of any series of preferred stock. The Certificate of Amendment
was approved by our board of directors on July 16, 2009.

In
connection with an equity financing we completed in March 2005, we amended the Stockholder Rights Plan to provide that Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., or Warburg, and
certain of its affiliates will be exempt from the Stockholder Rights Plan, unless Warburg and its affiliates become, without the prior consent of our Board of Directors, the beneficial owner of more
than 44% of our common stock.

In
connection with the acquisition of shares of our common stock by Baker in the February 2007 Financing, we amended the Stockholder Rights Plan to provide that Baker will be exempt from
the Stockholder Rights Plan, unless Baker becomes, without the Company's prior consent, the beneficial owner of more than 20% of our common stock.

Until
the Rights become exercisable, the Rights will have no dilutive impact on our earnings per share data. The Rights are protected by customary anti-dilution provisions.
As of December 31, 2009, no shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock were issued or outstanding.

F-22

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

5. Stock-Based Compensation Plans

Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 has been recognized in the accompanying Statements of Operations as follows:

2009

2008

2007Research and development

$
2,395

$
3,118

$
2,052Selling, general and administrative


6,285


4,902


4,599Total stock-based compensation expense

$
8,680

$
8,020

$
6,651


Effective
September 30, 2009, Pablo J. Cagnoni, M.D., our former Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer (CMO), resigned. As a result of his resignation, we
adjusted the forfeiture rate applied to his equity compensation, which resulted in a one-time $906,000 reversal of research and development stock-based compensation expense during the
three months ended September 30, 2009, of which $699,000 related to stock option awards, $166,000 related to restricted stock awards and $41,000 related to restricted stock unit awards.

We
did not recognize a related tax benefit during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, as we maintain net operating loss carryforwards and we have established a valuation
allowance against the entire tax benefit as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. No stock-based compensation expense was capitalized on our Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and
2008.

Stock Options

During 1995, our Board of Directors adopted the 1995 Stock Option Plan, or the 1995 Plan. The 1995 Plan was amended and restated in
1997. Under the 1995 Plan, we could grant fixed and performance-based stock options and stock appreciation rights to officers, employees, consultants and directors. The stock options were intended to
qualify as "incentive stock options" under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, unless specifically designated as non-qualifying stock options or unless exceeding the
applicable statutory limit.

During
2000, concurrent with the IPO, the Board of Directors suspended the 1995 Plan and adopted the Allos Therapeutics, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, or the 2000
Plan. The 2000 Plan provided for the granting of stock options similar to the terms of the 1995 Plan as described above. Any shares remaining for future option grants and any future cancellations of
options from our 1995 Plan were available for future grant under the 2000 Plan. Suspension of the 1995 Plan had no effect on the options outstanding under the 1995 Plan. Under the 2000 Plan, we were
authorized to increase the number of shares of common stock that were available annually on the first day of each fiscal year beginning in 2001 in an amount equal to the lesser of 440,000 shares or 2%
of the adjusted average common shares outstanding used to calculate fully diluted earnings per share as reported in our Annual Report to Stockholders for the preceding year, or alternatively, by any
lesser amount determined by our Board of Directors. On December 21, 2005, our stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of the 2000 Plan to: (i) increase the aggregate number of
shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2000 Plan by 3,500,000 shares and (ii) provide that the number of shares of common stock that could be granted under the 2000 Plan to
any one employee during any calendar year could not exceed 2,000,000 shares.

F-23

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

5. Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Continued)

In
January 2002, our Board of Directors approved the Allos Therapeutics, Inc. 2002 Broad Based Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2002 Plan. Under the 2002 Plan, we were authorized to
issue up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock to employees, consultants and members of the Board of Directors. Under the terms of the 2002 Plan, the aggregate number of shares underlying stock awards
to officers and directors once employed by us cannot exceed 49% of the number of shares underlying all stock awards granted, as determined on certain specific dates.

In
June 2006, our Board of Directors approved the Allos Therapeutics, Inc. 2006 Inducement Award Plan, or the 2006 Plan. Under the 2006 Plan, we were authorized to issue up to
1,500,000 shares of common stock pursuant to equity awards, including nonstatutory stock options, stock grant awards, stock purchase awards, stock unit awards and other forms of equity compensation.
We could grant awards under the 2006 Plan only to persons not previously an employee or director of ours, or
following a bona fide period of non-employment, as an inducement material to such individual's entering into employment with us and to provide incentives for such persons to exert maximum
efforts for our success.

At
our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 24, 2008, our stockholders approved the Allos Therapeutics, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2008 Plan. The 2008
Plan authorizes the issuance of incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, stock appreciation rights, performance stock awards and
forms of equity compensation, which may be granted to employees, directors and consultants. Only employees may receive incentive stock options. The 2008 Plan succeeds and continues the 2006 Plan, the
2002 Plan and the 2000 Plan, or the Prior Plans. As of June 24, 2008, no additional stock awards will be granted under the Prior Plans and all outstanding stock awards granted under the Prior
Plans are deemed to be stock awards granted under the 2008 Plan (but remain subject to the terms of the Prior Plans with respect to which they were originally granted).

12,550,843
shares of our common stock may be issued pursuant to stock awards granted under the 2008 Plan, provided that all stock awards granted after the June 24, 2008 effective
date of the 2008 Plan, other than stock options and stock appreciation rights granted with an exercise price of at least 100% of such stock award's fair market value on the date of grant, will reduce
the number of shares available for issuance under the 2008 Plan by 1.35 shares per share granted pursuant to the stock award. If a stock award under the 2008 Plan expires or otherwise terminates
without being exercised in full, the shares of common stock of the Company not acquired pursuant to the stock award will again become available for issuance under the 2008 Plan. In addition, shares
issued pursuant to a stock award that are forfeited to or repurchased by us prior to becoming fully vested and shares that are cancelled pursuant to an exchange or repricing program will become
available for the grant of new stock awards under the 2008 Plan. Shares of common stock that revert to and again become available for issuance under the 2008 Plan and that prior to such reversion were
granted pursuant to a stock award that reduced the number of shares available under the 2008 Plan by 1.35 shares per share granted pursuant to such stock award, shall cause the number of shares of
common stock of the Company available for issuance under the 2008 Plan to increase by 1.35 shares upon such reversion.

At
our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 23, 2009, our stockholders approved an amendment to the Allos Therapeutics, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, or the Plan,
to increase the aggregate number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the Plan by 5,750,000

F-24

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

5. Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Continued)

shares.
Our Board of Directors had previously approved the amendment and recommended its approval to our stockholders.

The
1995 and 2008 Plans, or the Plans, provide for appropriate adjustments in the number of shares reserved and outstanding options in the event of certain changes to our outstanding
common stock by reason of merger, recapitalization, stock split or other similar events. Options granted under the Plans may be exercised for a period of not more than 10 years from the date of
grant or any shorter period as
determined by our Board of Directors. Options vest as determined by the Board of Directors, generally over a period of two to four years, subject to acceleration under certain events. The exercise
price of any incentive stock option granted under the Plans must equal or exceed the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, or 110% of the fair market value per share in the case
of a 10% or greater stockholder.

The
following table summarizes our stock option activity and related information for the 1995 and 2008 Plans:

Options Outstanding

Options ExercisableNumber of
Shares

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

Number of
Shares

Weighted
Average
Exercise PriceOutstanding at December 31, 2006


5,778,571

$
3.60


2,900,556

$
4.27Granted


2,731,574


6.53Exercised


(1,156,471
)

3.20Forfeited


(948,244
)

5.31Outstanding at December 31, 2007


6,405,430

$
4.68


2,754,274

$
3.80Granted


2,790,312


6.24Exercised


(1,144,041
)

4.63Forfeited


(815,189
)

6.00Outstanding at December 31, 2008


7,236,512

$
5.14


3,122,681

$
4.15Granted


2,959,872


6.69Exercised


(1,241,034
)

3.77Forfeited


(662,854
)

5.96Outstanding at December 31, 2009


8,292,496

$
5.83


3,823,683

$
5.02


F-25

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

5. Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Continued)

The
following table summarizes information about options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2009:

Options Outstanding

Options ExercisableRange of Exercise Prices

Outstanding

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

Exercisable

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price$1.90$2.55


538,459


2.7

$
2.31


538,042

$
2.31$2.56$2.95


461,498


6.2


2.77


438,913


2.78$2.96$3.24


531,852


5.9


3.13


443,245


3.13$3.25$5.62


663,327


6.6


4.78


386,796


4.74$5.63$5.84


416,203


8.6


5.75


180,571


5.67$5.85$6.16


1,497,132


7.6


6.08


698,076


6.05$6.17$6.75


1,981,287


8.8


6.40


309,747


6.34$6.76$7.47


1,228,538


7.6


7.36


690,915


7.40$7.48$7.75


323,720


9.3


7.66





$7.76$13.75


650,480


8.6


8.18


137,378


8.698,292,496


7.5

$
5.83


3,823,683

$
5.02


The
following table summarizes information about outstanding stock options that are fully vested and currently exercisable, and outstanding stock options that are expected to vest in the
future:

Number Outstanding

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term

Weighted Average Exercise Price

Aggregate Intrinsic ValueAs of December 31, 2009:Options fully vested and exercisable


3,823,683


6.0

$
5.02

$
6,817,120Options expected to vest, including effects of expected forfeitures


3,711,093


8.8

$
6.51


1,457,436Options fully vested and expected to vest


7,534,776


7.4

$
5.75

$
8,274,556


During
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we granted stock options with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $4.12, $3.88 and $4.12 per share,
respectively. Stock-based compensation expense related to our stock option plans was $8,147,000, $7,539,000 and $5,899,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The stock-based compensation expense amounts for the year ended December 31, 2009 include the $699,000 one-time reversal related to the resignation of our former CMO discussed
above. As of December 31, 2009, the unrecorded stock-based compensation balance related to stock option awards
was $8,133,000 and will be recognized over an estimated weighted-average amortization period of 1.4 years.

The
aggregate intrinsic value in the tables above represents the total pretax intrinsic value, based on our closing stock price of $6.58 as of December 31, 2009, which would have
been received by the option holders had all option holders with in-the-money options exercised their options as of that date.

F-26

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

5. Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Continued)

The
total number of in-the-money options exercisable as of December 31, 2009 was 6,081,058. The total intrinsic value of outstanding stock options as of
December 31, 2009 was $8,275,000.

The
total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $4,583,000, $3,168,000 and $2,634,000, respectively. The total cash
received from employees as a result of employee stock option exercises during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $4,683,000, $5,291,000 and $3,697,000, respectively. We settle
employee stock option exercises with newly issued common shares. No tax benefits were realized by us in connection with these exercises during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 or 2007 as
we maintain net operating loss carryforwards and we have established a valuation allowance against the entire tax benefit as of December 31, 2009.

Valuation assumptions for stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

For stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the majority vest according to the following
schedule: 25% of the shares subject to the award vest one year after the date of grant, and the remaining 75% of the shares subject to the award vest in equal monthly installments thereafter over the
next three years, until all such shares are vested and exercisable. Stock-based compensation is calculated according to the FASB issued accounting guidance and is expensed over the vesting period of
the individual options using the graded vesting attribution method. The fair value of stock options granted to our employees during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was
estimated on the date of each grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted-average assumptions:

2009

2008

2007Stock option plans:Expected dividend yield


0
%

0
%

0
%Expected stock price volatility


72
%

74
%

80
%Risk free interest rate


2.1
%

2.9
%

4.7
%Expected life (years)


5.2


5.0


4.3


We
used an expected dividend yield of 0%, as we do not expect to pay dividends during the expected life of these awards. The expected stock price volatility is determined using our
historical stock volatility over the period equal to the expected life of each award. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining
term equal to the expected life of each award. During the first quarter of 2007, the expected life was determined by factoring the different vesting periods of each award in combination with our
employees' expected exercise behavior. In June 2007, we concluded that our historical share option exercise experience would not provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term going
forward, given our relative stage of development and changes in our business given the termination of a previous
development program. Beginning in the second quarter of 2007, the expected life of the stock options was estimated using peer data of companies in the life science industry with similar equity plans.
Stock-based compensation expense is recognized net of estimated pre-vesting forfeitures, which results in recognition of expense on options that are ultimately expected to vest over the
expected option term. Forfeitures were estimated using actual historical forfeiture experience.

F-27

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

5. Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Continued)

Restricted Stock

The following table summarizes activity and related information for our restricted stock, or RS, awards:

Number of
Shares

Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair ValueNonvested RS at December 31, 2006


410,000

$
3.14Granted


105,000


6.08Vested


(102,500
)

3.14Nonvested RS at December 31, 2007


412,500


3.89Granted


10,000


7.49Vested


(128,750
)

3.74Nonvested RS at December 31, 2008


293,750


4.07Granted





Vested


(131,250
)

3.81Forfeited


(37,500
)

6.17Nonvested RS at December 31, 2009


125,000

$
3.72


During
the year ended December 31, 2009 we did not grant any shares of restricted stock. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we granted 10,000 and 105,000
shares of restricted stock, respectively. The shares of restricted stock vest in four equal annual installments from the date of grant. The grant-date fair value of shares granted during
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $0, $75,000 and $638,000, respectively. The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share for restricted stock awards granted
was based on the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the grant dates of the awards and was $0, $7.49 and $6.08 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $869,000, $751,000 and $643,000, respectively. During the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded stock-based compensation related to restricted stock awards of $48,000, $423,000 and $690,000, respectively. The stock-based compensation expense
amounts for the year ended December 31, 2009 includes the $166,000 one-time reversal related to the resignation of our former CMO discussed above. As of December 31, 2009,
the unrecorded stock-based compensation balance related to restricted stock awards was $53,000 and will be recognized over an estimated weighted-average amortization period of 1.2 years.

F-28

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

5. Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Continued)

The
following table summarizes activity and related information for restricted stock unit, or RSU, awards:

Number of
Shares

Weighted Average
Grant-Date
Fair ValueNonvested RSU at December 31, 2008




$
Granted


183,981


6.47Vested





Forfeited


(28,502
)

6.40Nonvested RSU at December 31, 2009


155,479

$
6.48


The
shares of restricted stock unit awards vest in four equal annual installments from the date of grant. Upon vesting of the restricted stock unit awards, we issue unrestricted shares
of our common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded stock-based compensation related to restricted stock unit awards of $368,000 and $0, respectively. The
stock-based compensation expense amounts for the year ended December 31, 2009 includes the $41,000 one-time reversal related to the resignation of our former CMO discussed above. As
of December 31, 2009, the unrecorded stock-based compensation balance related to restricted stock unit awards was $547,000 and will be recognized over an estimated weighted-average amortization
period of 1.6 years.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On February 28, 2001, our Board of Directors approved the Allos Therapeutics, Inc. 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or
Purchase Plan, which was also approved by our stockholders on April 17, 2001. Under the Purchase Plan, we are authorized to issue up to 2,500,000 shares of common stock to qualified employees.
Qualified employees can choose to have up to 10% of their annual base earnings withheld to purchase shares of our common stock during each offering period. The purchase price of the common stock is
85% percent of the lower of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the first day of the offering or the fair market value of a share of common stock on the last day of the purchase
period. We sold 42,063, 22,828 and 41,148 shares to employees in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. There were 2,217,714 shares available for sale under the Purchase Plan as of December 31,
2009. The Purchase Plan will terminate on February 27, 2011. Stock-based compensation expense related to our Purchase Plan was $117,000, $59,000 and $61,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, there was no unrecorded deferred stock-based compensation balance related to the Purchase Plan. The
weighted-average estimated grant date fair value of purchase awards under the Purchase Plan during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $2.78, $2.59 and $1.42 per share,
respectively.

F-29

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

5. Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Continued)

The
fair value of purchase awards granted to our employees during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using
the following weighted-average assumptions:

2009

2008

2007Stock purchase plan:Expected dividend yield


0
%

0
%

0
%Expected stock price volatility


77
%

65
%

55
%Risk free interest rate


0.4
%

2.6
%

4.9
%Expected life (years)


0.5


0.5


0.9


6. Intangible asset, net

Costs incurred for products or product candidates not yet approved by the FDA and for which no alternative future use exists are recorded as expense. In the event a product or product
candidate has been approved by the FDA or an alternative future use exists for a product or product candidate, patent and license costs are capitalized and amortized over the shorter of the expected
patent life and the expected life cycle of the related product or product candidate.

As
a result of the FDA's approval to market FOLOTYN on September 24, 2009, we met a milestone under our license agreement with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,
SRI International and Southern Research Institute, discussed in Note 9, which required us to make a milestone payment of $5.8 million. We capitalized the $5.8 million
payment as an intangible asset and began amortizing the asset immediately following the FDA approval to market FOLOTYN. Amortization expense is being recorded on a straight line basis over the
remaining expected life of the patent for FOLOTYN, which we expect to last until July 16, 2022. This includes the anticipated Hatch-Waxman extension that provides patent protection
for drug compounds for a period of up to five years to compensate for time spent in development. This term is our best estimate of the life of the patent. If, however, the Hatch-Waxman extension is
not granted, the intangible asset will be amortized over a shorter period. The amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 totaling $121,000 is recorded as amortization of
intangible assets in the statement of operations. The estimated annual amortization expense for the intangible asset is approximately $454,000 per year during 2010 through 2021 and $234,000 in 2022.

The
carrying values of intangible assets are periodically reviewed to determine if the facts and circumstances suggest that a potential impairment may have occurred. No trigger events
occurred for the year ended December 31, 2009 on the intangible asset, net of $5,679,000.

7. Income Taxes

We have incurred net losses since inception.

F-30

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

7. Income Taxes (Continued)

The
components of our current and deferred tax (provisions) benefit, which arise from temporary differences between financial and tax reporting consists of the following:

December 31,2009

2008

2007CurrentFederal

$
65

$


$
State


12





$
77

$


$
DeferredFederal

$


$


$
State








$


$


$
TotalFederal

$
65

$


$
State


12





$
77

$


$



Income
tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2009 was related to a federal and state research and experimentation income tax credit received.

The
income tax benefit computed using our net loss and the federal statutory income tax rate differs from our actual income tax benefit, primarily due to the following for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

2009

2008

2007Federal income tax benefit at 35%

$
(25,766
)
$
(18,105
)
$
(13,779
)State income tax (benefit), net of federal benefit


(1,506
)

(1,449
)

975Stock-based compensation


1,660


555


1,161Research and development and orphan drug credits


(503
)

(1,244
)

(3,311
)Research and development and orphan drug credits to expire related to Section 382 limitation








5,880Net operating losses to expire related to Section 382 limitation








23,086Change in valuation allowance


25,689


20,208


(14,162
)Other


349


35


150Benefit for income taxes

$
(77
)
$


$



F-31

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

7. Income Taxes (Continued)

The
components of our deferred tax assets are as follows, as of December 31:

2009

2008Deferred tax assets:Net operating loss carryforwards

$
87,765

$
64,471Amortization of intangibles


1,865


1,299Research and development and orphan drug credit carryforwards


9,915


9,110Stock-based compensation


5,183


4,736Other


973


396Total deferred tax assets


105,701


80,012Valuation allowance


(105,701
)

(80,012
)Net deferred tax assets

$


$



Our
deferred tax assets represent an unrecognized future tax benefit. A valuation allowance has been established for the entire tax benefit as we believe that it is more likely than not
that such assets will not be realized.

As
of December 31, 2009, we had available approximately $238.7 million of net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards, after taking into consideration NOLs expected to expire
unused due to the limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, and which includes approximately $6.5 million of deductions related to stock-based compensation that are not
realized as deferred tax assets until current taxes payable can be reduced. Of these NOL carryforwards, $2.3 million will expire beginning in 2010, $3.9 million in 2011,
$6.2 million in 2012 and the remaining NOL carryforwards expire in 2018 through 2029. In addition, as of December 31, 2009, we had research and development credit and orphan drug credit
carryforwards, after taking into consideration the Section 382 limitation, of $4.1 million and $5.8 million, respectively, to offset future regular tax expense. Since the
Company's formation, it has raised capital through the issuance of capital stock on several occasions which, combined with shareholders' subsequent disposition of those shares, has resulted in four
changes of control in 1994, 1998, 2001 and 2005, as defined by Section 382. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382, results from transactions increasing the ownership
of certain shareholders or public groups in the stock of a corporation by more than 50% within a three-year period. As a result of the most recent ownership change in 2005, utilization of
approximately $59.9 million of NOL carryforwards generated prior to the latest change are subject to an annual limitation of approximately $2.2 million under Section 382,
determined by multiplying the value of our stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Additionally, we have a recognized
built-in gain that will increase the annual limitation by $3.3 million for each of the five years after the 2005 ownership change. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over
to subsequent years, and the amount of the limitation may, under certain circumstances, be subject to adjustment if the fair value of the Company's net assets are determined to be below or in excess
of the tax basis of such assets at the time of the ownership change, and such unrealized loss or gain is recognized during the five-year period after the ownership change. Subsequent
ownership changes, as defined in Section 382, could

F-32

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

7. Income Taxes (Continued)

further
limit the amount of our NOL carryforwards and research and development credits that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income.

We
follow a comprehensive model for recognizing, measuring, presenting and disclosing uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Tax positions must initially
be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions must initially and
subsequently be measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the
position and relevant facts. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial statements. Our evaluation was
performed for the periods from December 31, 1993 through December 31, 2009, the tax periods which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of December 31, 2009.

We
may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions, although there have been no such assessments historically with material impact to our financial
results. In the event we receive an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it would be classified in the financial statements as income tax expense.

8. Employee Benefit Plan

We maintain a defined contribution plan covering substantially all employees under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Effective January 1, 2007, we provided a 50%
match of employees' contributions up to $5,000 per employee per year. We made total contributions of $356,000, $246,000 and $241,000 during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Company contributions are fully vested after four years of employment.

9. Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Commitments

We lease offices and automobiles under agreements that expire at various dates through 2012. These office leases contain clauses for
renewal at our option for one additional three year term. Total office rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $786,000, $715,000 and $686,000, respectively.

The
aggregate future minimum rental commitments as of December 31, 2009, for non-cancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year are
as follows:

Year Ending December 31:2010

$
1,1332011


1,0712012


2532013


Total

$
2,457


F-33

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

9. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

Royalty and License Fee Commitments

In December 2002, we entered into a license agreement with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, SRI International and Southern
Research Institute, as amended, under which we obtained exclusive worldwide rights to a portfolio of patents and patent applications related to FOLOTYN and its uses. Under the terms of the agreement,
we paid an up-front license fee of $2.0 million upon execution of the agreement and have made aggregate milestone payments of $2.5 million based on the passage of time.
Additionally, in May and September 2009, we made milestone payments of $1.5 million based on the FDA accepting our New Drug Application for review and $5.8 million based on the FDA
approval to market FOLOTYN, respectively. The up-front license fee and all milestone payments under the agreement prior to FDA approval to market FOLOTYN were recorded to research and
development expense as incurred. As discussed in Note 6, the $5.8 million milestone payment based on the FDA approval was capitalized as an intangible asset and is being amortized over
the expected useful life of the composition of matter patent for FOLOTYN, which we expect to last until July 16, 2022. The only remaining potential milestone payment under the license agreement
is for $3.5 million upon regulatory approval to market FOLOTYN in Europe, which, if made would be capitalized and amortized over the expected useful
life. Under the terms of the agreement, we are required to fund all development programs and will have sole responsibility for all commercialization activities. In addition, we will pay the licensors
royalties based on graduated annual levels of net sales of FOLOTYN to our distributors, net of actual rebates and chargebacks, or distributor sales, which may be different than our net product revenue
recognized in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, or sublicense revenues arising from sublicensing the product, if and when such sales or sublicenses occur.
Royalties are 8% of annual distributor sales up to $150.0 million; 9% of annual distributor sales of $150.0 million through $300.0 million; and 11% of annual distributor sales in
excess of $300.0 million. In 2009, our royalties were 8% of our net distributor sales.

In
December 2004, we entered into an agreement with the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, the University of Salford and Cancer Research Technology, or CRT, under which we
obtained exclusive worldwide rights to certain intellectual property surrounding a proprietary molecule known as RH1. Under the terms of the agreement, we paid an up-front license fee of
$190,500 upon execution of the agreement. The up-front license fee, as well as the one-time data option fee discussed below, have been recorded to research and development
expense. Under the terms of the agreement and related data option agreement, we paid the licensors a one-time data option fee of $360,000 in 2007 for an exclusive license to the results of
a Phase 1 study sponsored by Cancer Research UK, CRT's parent institution. In June 2009, we discontinued the RH1 development program. In August 2009, we provided notice of termination of our
license agreement for RH1 to the licensors, which termination was effective September 6, 2009.

Contingencies

We were named as a defendant in a purported securities class action lawsuit filed in May 2004 seeking unspecified damages relating to
the issuance of allegedly false and misleading statements regarding EFAPROXYN during the period from May 29, 2003 to April 29, 2004 and subsequent declines in our stock price. In an
opinion dated October 20, 2005, the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado concluded that the plaintiffs' complaint failed to meet the legal requirements

F-34

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

9. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

applicable
to its alleged claims and dismissed the lawsuit. On November 20, 2005, the plaintiffs appealed the District Court's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. On
February 6, 2008, the parties signed a stipulation of settlement, settling the case for $2,000,000. The settlement was subject to various conditions, including, without limitation, approval of
the District Court. On January 29, 2009, the District Court issued its Order and Final Judgment approving the settlement, including the releases of the defendants for which the settlement
provided. Neither we nor our former officer, who was also named as a defendant, admitted any liability in connection with the settlement. The amount of the settlement in excess of our deductible was
covered by our insurance carrier. The period to appeal the District Court's approval of the settlement lapsed during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 without any further appeals being filed and the settlement is final. We have no further obligations related to this lawsuit and have no accrual remaining related to the
settlement.

We
enter into indemnification provisions under our agreements with other companies in our ordinary course of business, typically with business partners, contractors, clinical sites and
suppliers. Under these provisions we generally indemnify and hold harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of our activities or the use of
our product candidates. These indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under
these indemnification provisions is unlimited. We have not incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. The estimated fair value of the
indemnification provisions of these agreements is minimal as of December 31, 2009, and accordingly, we have no corresponding liabilities recorded as of December 31, 2009.

10. Related Party Transactions

Dr. Donald Abraham

In January 2001, we entered into a consulting agreement for scientific advisory services with Dr. Donald Abraham, a director of
the Company from 1994 through May 10, 2004. Under the one-year agreement, which was renewable upon mutual consent, we paid Dr. Abraham consulting fees of $2,000 per month. In
March 2002, this contract was terminated. Effective July 1, 2003, we entered into another one-year consulting agreement, under which we paid Dr. Abraham consulting fees of
$5,000 per month. Starting in June 2004, this agreement was renewed each year for successive one-year terms through June 30, 2007. The agreement was not renewed after
June 30, 2007. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we paid Dr. Abraham consulting fees of $0, $0, $30,000 respectively.

Dr. Marvin Jaffe, M.D.

Dr. Marvin E. Jaffe served as a member of our Board of Directors from 1994 to May 10, 2006. On March 11, 2006,
Dr. Jaffe tendered his resignation as a director of the Company effective immediately prior to our 2006 annual meeting of stockholders and notified the Board that he did not intend to stand for
reelection. As a result of Dr. Jaffe's resignation as a director, on May 10, 2006, we entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Jaffe in order to allow us to retain the benefit
of Dr. Jaffe's knowledge and expertise regarding the Company's business and the potential clinical development and

F-35

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

10. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

commercialization
strategies for our products (the "Jaffe Consulting Agreement"). Pursuant to the Jaffe Consulting Agreement, Dr. Jaffe agreed to provide up to 10 hours of consulting
service per month as and when requested from time to time by the Company. In connection with the performance of his consulting services, we granted Dr. Jaffe a nonqualified stock option under
the Company's 2000 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to $2.94 per share, which equals the closing sale price of a share of our
common stock on the effective date of the Jaffe Consulting Agreement (as reported by the Nasdaq National Market). This option is subject to the terms and conditions of the 2000 Stock Incentive
Compensation Plan, as further provided in our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, and vests in eighteen equal monthly installments commencing July 1, 2006. Dr. Jaffe is not entitled to any
additional compensation or benefits in connection with the performance of his consulting services. The Jaffe Consulting Agreement terminated on December 31, 2007.

Michael E. Hart

Pursuant to the Separation Agreement with Mr. Hart and as a result of Mr. Hart's resignation as a director, on
May 10, 2006, we entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Hart in order to allow us to retain the benefit of Mr. Hart's historical knowledge regarding the Company's operations
and corporate development strategies, or the Hart Consulting Agreement. Pursuant to the Hart Consulting Agreement, Mr. Hart agreed to provide an average of at least 10 hours of
consulting services per month as and when requested from time to time by the Company. Mr. Hart is not entitled to any compensation or benefits in connection with the performance of his
consulting services, except for those payments and benefits being provided to him under the Separation Agreement. The Hart Consulting Agreement terminated on December 31, 2007.

F-36

---



Table of Contents

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars shown in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts)

11. Quarterly Information (Unaudited)

The results of operations on a quarterly basis for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:

March 31,
2009

June 30,
2009

Sept. 30,
2009

Dec. 31,
2009

March 31,
2008

June 30,
2008

Sept. 30,
2008

Dec. 31,
2008Net product sales

$


$


$


$
3,585

$


$


$


$
Operating costs and expenses:Cost of sales, excluding amortization expense











408











Research and development


8,360


8,776


7,538


7,944


7,561


6,889


8,089


8,056Selling, general and administrative


6,963


8,037


11,327


18,121


5,011


5,439


5,326


7,268Amortization of intangible asset








7


114











Total operating costs and expenses


15,323


16,813


18,872


26,587


12,572


12,328


13,415


15,324Operating loss


(15,323
)

(16,813
)

(18,872
)

(23,002
)

(12,572
)

(12,328
)

(13,415
)

(15,324
)Interest and other income, net


173


6


125


76


565


504


254


586Loss before income taxes


(15,150
)

(16,807
)

(18,747
)

(22,926
)

(12,007
)

(11,824
)

(13,161
)

(14,738
)Income tax benefit








77














Net loss

$
(15,150
)
$
(16,807
)
$
(18,670
)
$
(22,926
)
$
(12,007
)
$
(11,824
)
$
(13,161
)
$
(14,738
)Net loss per share: basic and diluted

$
(0.19
)
$
(0.19
)
$
(0.21
)
$
(0.22
)
$
(0.18
)
$
(0.16
)
$
(0.16
)
$
(0.18
)Weighted average shares: basic and diluted


81,096,293


89,011,044


89,543,949


102,007,968


67,266,819


72,382,487


80,752,024


80,894,796


12. Subsequent Events

We have evaluated all subsequent events through the date which these financial statements were issued.

F-37

---





Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Incorporated by ReferenceExhibit
No.

Description

Form

Filing
Date

Number

Filed
Herewith3.01

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

8-K

7/20/2009

3.13.02

Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.

8-K

7/20/2009

3.23.03

Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

8-K

7/20/2009

3.33.04

Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.

8-K

7/20/2009

3.43.05

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Allos Therapeutics, Inc.

8-K

6/25/2007

3.044.01

Form of Common Stock Certificate.

S-1/A

3/17/2000

4.014.02

Reference is made to Exhibits 3.01, 3.02, 3.03 and 3.04.4.03

Rights Agreement dated May 6, 2003 between Allos and Mellon Investor Services LLC.

8-K

5/9/2003

99.24.04

Form of Rights Certificate.

8-K

5/9/2003

99.34.05

Amendment to Rights Agreement dated March 4, 2005 between Allos and Mellon Investor Services LLC.

8-K

3/4/2005

4.064.06

Amendment to Rights Agreement dated January 29, 2007 between Allos and Mellon Investor Services LLC.

8-K

1/30/2007

4.14.07

Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2009, between the Company and Mellon Investor Services LLC.

8-K

7/20/2009

4.110.01

Form of Amended and Restated Indemnity Agreement between Allos and each of its directors and officers.

8-K

6/25/2007

10.0110.02

1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended.

S-1

1/26/2000

10.1110.03

2000 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended.

8-K

12/22/2005

10.110.03.1

Form of Incentive Stock Option Letter Agreement under 2000 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan.

8-K

2/11/2005

99.110.03.2

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Letter Agreement under 2000 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan.

8-K

2/11/2005

99.210.03.3

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Letter Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under 2000 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan.

8-K

2/24/2006

10.1


---



Table of Contents

Incorporated by ReferenceExhibit
No.

Description

Form

Filing
Date

Number

Filed
Herewith10.04

2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and form of Offering.

10-K

3/7/2001

10.2610.04.1

2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan Offering (Series Beginning July 1, 2007).

8-K

6/25/2007

10.12.110.05*

Office Lease dated April 4, 2001 between Allos and Catellus Development Corporation.

10-Q

8/14/2001

10.2710.05.1*

Amended and Restated Second Amendment to Lease dated December 9, 2002 between Allos and Catellus Development Corporation.

10-K

3/28/2003

10.27.110.05.2*

Third Amendment to Lease dated November 28, 2003 between Allos and Catellus Development Corporation.

10-K

3/5/2004

10.27.210.05.3*

Fifth Amendment to Office Lease Agreement dated June 16, 2008 between Allos and Circle Point Properties, LLC.

10-Q

8/5/2008

10.5.310.06

Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 2, 2005 between Allos and the Investors listed on the signature pages thereto.

8-K/A

3/10/2005

10.4110.07

Registration Rights Agreement dated March 4, 2005 between Allos and the Investors listed on Schedule I thereto.

8-K/A

3/10/2005

10.4210.08

Letter Agreement dated March 4, 2005 among Allos, Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus & Co. and Warburg Pincus LLC.

8-K

3/4/2005

10.4310.09

Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors.

10-Q

8/4/2009

10.110.10

Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated March 9, 2006 between Allos and Paul L. Berns.

8-K

3/14/2006

10.210.11

2006 Inducement Award Plan, including forms of Stock Option Grant Notice with Stock Option Agreement and Restricted Stock Grant Notice with Restricted Stock Grant Agreement.

8-K

6/6/2006

10.110.12

Letter agreement dated January 28, 2007 among Allos, Baker Bros. Investments, L.P., Baker Bros. Investments II, L.P., Baker/Tisch Investments, L.P., Baker Biotech Fund I, L.P., 14159,
 L.P. and Baker Brothers Life Sciences, L.P.

8-K

1/30/2007

10.110.13*

License Agreement for 10-Propargyl-10-Deazaaminopterin "PDX" dated December 23, 2002 and amended May 9, 2006 between Allos and SRI International, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research and Southern
Research Institute.







X


---



Table of Contents

Incorporated by ReferenceExhibit
No.

Description

Form

Filing
Date

Number

Filed
Herewith10.13.1*

Second Amendment to License Agreement for 10-Propargyl-10-Deazaaminopterin "PDX" dated November 6, 2007 between Allos and SRI International, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research and Southern Research
Institute.

10-K

2/27/2008

10.18.1

X10.14

Corporate Bonus Plan, as amended and restated effective September 15, 2008.

10-Q

11/5/2008

10.110.15

Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective December 13, 2007, between Allos and Paul L. Berns.

10-K

2/27/2008

10.2010.15.1

First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2009, between Allos and Paul L. Berns.

8-K

5/22/2009

10.110.16

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective December 13, 2007, between Allos and James V. Caruso.

10-K

2/27/2008

10.2210.16.1

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2009, between Allos and James V. Caruso.

8-K

5/22/2009

10.310.17

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective December 13, 2007, between Allos and Marc H. Graboyes.

10-K

2/27/2008

10.2310.17.1

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2009, between Allos and Marc H. Graboyes.

8-K

5/22/2009

10.410.18

Letter agreement, effective January 22, 2008, between Allos and Bruce K. Bennett.

10-K

2/27/2008

10.2410.19

Executive Compensation and Equity Awards.

8-K

2/26/2010

10.110.20

Allos Therapeutics, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended.

8-K

6/26/2009

10.210.20.1

Form of Option Grant Notice and Agreement under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

S-8

6/24/2008

99.210.20.2

Form of Restricted Stock Award Grant Notice and Agreement under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

S-8

6/24/2008

99.310.20.3

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Agreement under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

8-K

2/27/2009

10.210.21

Allos Therapeutics, Inc. Severance Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective December 11, 2007.

8-K

2/27/2009

10.310.21.1

Allos Therapeutics, Inc. Change in Control Severance Benefit Schedule, as amended and restated effective February 23, 2008.

8-K

2/27/2009

10.4


---



Table of Contents

Incorporated by ReferenceExhibit
No.

Description

Form

Filing
Date

Number

Filed
Herewith10.21.2

Allos Therapeutics, Inc. Amendment No. 1 to Change in Control Severance Benefit Schedule, adopted May 19, 2009.

8-K

5/22/2009

10.510.22

Employment Agreement, effective June 25, 2009, between the Company and David C. Clark.

8-K

6/26/2009

10.123.01

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.







X24.01

Power of Attorney (included on signature page hereto).







X31.01

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.







X31.02

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.







X32.01#

Section 1350 Certification.







X


---

---