alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Otto A. Mathein v. Hazel Mathein

179 So. 663.

Division A.

Opinion Filed March 3, 1938.

*William J. Pruitt*and *Van C. Swearingen,*for Appellant; L. *J. Cushman, Thos. W. Mcllvain*and *J. Velma Keen,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

In this case final decree of divorce was entered on September 7, 1935.

On October 3, 1935, motion was filed praying that the final decree and decree *pro confesso*be vacated and set aside. This motion may be considered as a bill in the nature of a Bill of Review. See Brown v. Sullivan, 113 Fla. 59, Sou. 319.

On October 31, 1935, order was entered and same was recorded on November 1, 1935, in the Chancery Order Book which order vacated and set aside the final decree and allowed defendant to file an answer.

On November 4, 1936, motion was filed to set aside and vacate the order of October 31, 1935, recorded November 1, 1935.

*624The record shows no order made on that motion.

The notice of appeal recites that the appeal is from an order made and entered October 31, 1935, recorded in Chancery Order Book 372 on page 125, which was the order setting aside the final decree hereinabove referred to and “also the denying of the complainant’s motion filed November 14th, 1936, to set aside the Order made and entered the 31st da)f of October, 1935, and recorded in chancery order book 372 on page 125.”

This notice of appeal was entered on the 20th day of November, 1936. There is no order in the record denying complainant’s motion filed November 14, 1936, and. therefore, there is nothing for us to review in that regard. The appeal is not effective to review the order entered on October 31, 1935, and recorded on the 1st day of November, 1935, because the appeal was entered more than six months after the order was entered and recorded.

So the appeal presenting no justiciable matter for our consideration, must be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Wi-iitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,918; TA-W-60,918A] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 8, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a Company Official and on behalf of workers at Bosal Industries Georgia, a subsidiary of Bosal International North America, Lavonia, Georgia (TA-W-60,918) and Bosal Industries Tennessee, a subsidiary of Bosal International North America, Columbia, Tennessee (TA-W-60,918A). 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of March, 2007. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7-4998 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
C.S.T. v. D.J.U.S.D.

Case No. CIV 2:04-cv-02748-MCE-GGH

Ex Parte Application for Order to Protect Plaintiff’s Privacy by Proceeding under a 

Pseudonym Page 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICE OF MARGARET BROUSSARD 

Margaret Mary Broussard (SBN 219251) 

7909 Walerga Road 

Suite 112, PMB 1157 

Antelope, CA 95843 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

C.S.T.,A minor, By and Through 

J.T., His Guardian As Litem 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DAVIS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, 

Defendant 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No.: 2:04-cv-2748-MCE-GGH

ORDER 

The application submitted by Plaintiff C.S.T., by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, 

J.T., to protect his right to privacy and to proceed under a pseudonym, came before this Court. 

Plaintiff’s ex parte application for an order to protect his privacy rights, the memorandum of 

points and authorities, and the affidavit of counsel having been considered, and good cause 

appearing. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-02748-MCE -GGH Document 36 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 2
C.S.T. v. D.J.U.S.D.

Case No. CIV 2:04-cv-02748-MCE-GGH

Ex Parte Application for Order to Protect Plaintiff’s Privacy by Proceeding under a 

Pseudonym Page 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court orders 1) that Plaintiff and his Guardian Ad Litem may proceed under a 

pseudonym“C.S.T.”and“J.T.”, respectively, and 2) that all documents that contain personally 

identifiable information, including the Affidavit of Counsel, be filed under seal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: September 8, 2006 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-02748-MCE -GGH Document 36 Filed 09/08/06 Page 2 of 2
An equal opportunity employer Thomas M. Gray 211(b) Technical Manager 1220 L Street, Northwest Washington, DC 20005 -4070 Tel 202 - 682 -84 80 Fax 202 - 682 -80 31 E - mail grayt @api.org August 4, 2009 Karl Simon Acting Division Director Com pliance and Innovative Strategies Division 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Mail Code: 6406J Washington, DC 20460 RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation : Second Draft Final Report

Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate - A 13 - Week Whole - Body Inhalation Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessment and 4 - Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity Assessments (Study No. 00 - 612 9) Dear Mr. Karl Simon: The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is submitting the following information for EPA review and approval as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation :
 Second Draft Final Report: Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate A 13 -Week Whole - Body Inhalation Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessment and 4 -Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity Assessments (Study No. 00 - 612 9 )  Reviewer Checklist The Second Dra ft Final Report addresses all EPA and independent reviewer comments as indicated, with page citation, in the Revie wer Checklist. When the RG receives EPA’s approval of the second draft report, the final study report will be submitted to you at the EPA Off ice of Transportation and Air Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, as part of the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A - 90 - 07). If you require further information, please contact Tom Gray by mail at thi s address. Regards, Thomas M. Gray Encl ( 2 ): Second Draft Final Report: Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate A 13 - Week Whole - Body Inhalation Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessment and 4 - Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity Assessments (Study No. 00 - 612 9 ) Revie wer Checklist Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
Exhibit 8.1



MAIN SUBSIDIARIES OF TERRA NETWORKS, S.A. AT DECEMBER 31, 2003



|                                                   |  |                         
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Company                                            |  | Country of Incorporation
|Lycos, Inc.                                        |  | United States           
|                                                   | 
|Lycos Europe                                       |  | Netherlands             
|Terra Networks USA LLC                             |  | United States           
|Wired                                              |  | United States           
|Get Relevant                                       |  | United States           
|Tripod Pty Ltd.                                    |  | United States           
|Lycos Asia Ltd                                     |  | Singapore               
|                                                   | 
|Terra Networks Latam, S.L.                         |  | Spain                   
|                                                   | 
|Terra Networks Argentina, S.A.                     |  | Argentina               
|Terra Networks Chile, S.A.                         |  | Chile                   
|Terra Networks México, S.A. de C.V.                |  | Mexico                  
|Terra Networks Brasil, S.A.                        |  | Brazil                  
|Terra Networks Colombia, S.A.                      |  | Colombia                
|Terra Networks Perú, S.A.                          |  | Peru                    
|Terra Networks Guatemala, S.A.                     |  | Guatemala               
|                                                   | 
|Terra Networks Asociadas, S.L.                     |  | Spain                   
|                                                   | 
|Maptel Networks, S.A.                              |  | Spain                   
|Ifigenia Plus, S.L.                                |  | Spain                   
|Educaterra, S.A.                                   |  | Spain                   
|Red Universal de Marketing y Bookings Online, S.A. |  | Spain                   
|Azeler Automoción, S.A.                            |  | Spain                   
|Uno-e Bank, S.A.                                   |  | Spain                   
|OneTravel.com, Inc.                                |  | United States           
|                                                   | 
|Terra Networks España, S.A.U.                      |  | Spain                   
|                                                   | 
|Ordenamiento de Links Especializados, S.A.         |  | Spain
# C_2007073EN.01001401.xml

| 30.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/14

---

Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorizations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2007 to 31 January 2007

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1))

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1

(2007/C 73/09)

—   Modification of a marketing authorization (Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted

| Date of the decision | Name of the medicinal product | Holder of the marketing authorization | Number of the entry in the Community Register | Date of notification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.1.2007 | Ferriprox | Apotex Europe Ltd |
| Rowan House |
| 41 London Street |
| Reading |
| Berkshire RG1 4PS |
| United Kingdom |

Date of the decision

Name of the medicinal product

Holder of the marketing authorization

Number of the entry in the Community Register

Date of notification

26.1.2007

Ferriprox

Apotex Europe Ltd

Rowan House

41 London Street

Reading

Berkshire RG1 4PS

United Kingdom

EU/1/99/108/001

28.2.2007

---

(1)  OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 25 2001 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. CARLTON KEITH JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 00-6342 (D.C. No. CR-98-192-T) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before TACHA , Chief Judge, BALDOCK , Circuit Judge, and BRORBY Senior Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Defendant Carlton Keith Jackson appeals from the di strict court’s imposition of sentence following his guilty plea to one count of distribution of cocaine base in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We affirm. Defendant was sentenced to 226 months in prison, re flecting nine months’ credit for time served on a concurrent sentence fora prior drug offense. Defendant argues on appeal that the district court erred in (1) failing to require the government to move for downward departure basedon substantial assistance, in accordance with his interpretation of the plea a greement, and (2) making sentencing calculations based on duplicate and unre liable estimates of drug quantity. Because defendant made no objections in the district court, “this court reviews only for plain error. Plain error occurs when there is (1) error, (2) that is plain, which (3) affects substantial rights, and wh ich (4) seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” United States v. Price , No. 99-7078, 2001 WL 1040776, at *9 (10th Cir. Sept. 11, 2001) (citing Jones v. United States , 527 U.S. 373, 389 (1999)). Defendant has not shown that the imposition of his sentence constituted plain error. The claimed expectation of a governme nt motion for downward departure is not grounded in either the terms of th e plea agreement or the extent of his cooperation with authorities. Moreover, und er the appropriate sentencing-3-

guidelines, the district court made no miscalculati ons that affected the length of defendant’s sentence. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court
Wade Brorby Senior Circuit Judge
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002. In connection with the Quarterly Report of HLI Operating Company, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Curtis J. Clawson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ CURTIS J. CLAWSON   President and Chief Executive Officer
 September 8, 2004
Before the Second Division,

April 17, 1946

No. 51022.

#### Protests 14943-K, etc., of Arrow Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items of the merchandise consist of manila hemp hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218). Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the merchandise in question was held dutiable as claimed.
EXH 32.2

MARKETWATCH, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of
MarketWatch, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 3, 2004
(the "Report"), I, Joan P. Platt, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated therein.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: September 3, 2004

By: /s/ Joan P. Platt    Joan P. Platt, Chief Financial Officer

---
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Amendment No. 1


FORM 10-Q/A





x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2011





or





o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the transition period from ___________ to ___________





Commission File Number: 000-50356





EAST COAST DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION


(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Nevada
55-0840109(State or other Jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)





120 Interstate North Parkway, Suite 445


Atlanta, Georgia 30339


(Address of principal executive offices)





(770) 953-4184


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x   No o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x   No o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:





o
Large Accelerated Filer
o
Accelerated Filero
Non-Accelerated Filer
x
Smaller Reporting Company





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o   No x





As of November 14, 2011, there were 240,274,519 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock.











Explanatory Paragraph




The sole purpose of this Amendment No. 1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2011, is to correct a the XBRL statement on the cover page.
 
 No other changes have been made to the Form 10-Q other than the one described above. This Amendment No. 1 does not reflect subsequent events occurring after the original filings date of the Form 10-Q or modify or update in any way disclosures made in the Form 10-Q.




















SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.







Date:  December 27, 2011
By:
/s/ Kayode AladesuyiKayode AladesuyiChief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

(Principal Accounting Officer)











30
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-38724) pertaining to the Academic Systems Corporation 1992 Stock
Option Plan (1992 Plan), the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (2000 Plan) and the 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (2000 ESP Plan) of our report dated March 2, 2001,
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Lightspan, Inc. for the year ended
January 31, 2001.


                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Diego, California
April 27, 2001
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March

24 , 201 5
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 15 -00163- CR

PERCY BENJAMIN SMITH, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 65134-B



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N On February 25, 2015, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on his application for writ of habeas corpus. On March 11, 2015, appellant filed a le tter stating the notice of appeal was filed in error and requesting that we dismiss the appeal. We have construed the letter as a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). The motion is granted.2

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismisse d.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Wise. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### Mayflower Investment Company v. A. Brill, doing business under the name of Brill Electric Company, Continental Construction Company, etc., *et al.*

178 So. 827.

Division A.

Opinion Filed January 14, 1938.

Petition for Rehearing Denied February 17, 1938.

*A. M. Rader*and *Thomas H. Anderson,*for Appellant;

■ No appearance for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

In this case order dismissing the case in the lower court was entered on the 5th day of September, 1935. On the 27th day of March, 1936, a motion was filed by an intervenor to vacate the order of dismissal and reinstate the cause.

On the 5th day of March, 1937, the petition or motion of the intervenor, Mayflower Investment Company, was denied. From that order appeal was taken.

The order dismissing the cause was a final judgment and became absolute on the expiration of twenty (20) days subject to review on appeal within six months after the entry of the order, see Sec. 70, Florida Chancery Practice Act. No appeal was entered within the six months period. *71When the motion was made to vacate the final order dismissing the cause and to reinstate the cause the Court had lost jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties.

The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

So ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

The document you are trying to access is 

no longer available. Please contact 

Stacey.Rothgeb@nrel.gov for further 

information.