alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**Exhibit 31(a)**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Martin S. Lapera, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)            Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)            Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
| Date: April 27, 2007 |   | /s/ Martin S. Lapera                  |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Martin S. Lapera                      |
|                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# C_2008151EN.01003501.xml

| 17.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/35

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers (Recast)

COM(2007) 610 final — 2007/0219 (COD)

(2008/C 151/10)

On 14 November 2007 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 80 (2)of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers (Recast)

Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers (Recast)

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 441st plenary session of 16 and 17 January 2008 (meeting of 16 January) by 132 votes to 1 and 1 abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 16 January 2008.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---
EXH 32.2

MARKETWATCH, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of
MarketWatch, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September
30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 3,
2004 (the "Report"), I, Joan P. Platt, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated therein.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: September 3, 2004

By: /s/ Joan P. Platt    Joan P. Platt, Chief Financial Officer

---
No. 61365.

protest 312485-K (Los Angeles).

#### M. Pressner & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protest was dismissed.
#### Robert Montgomery and others v. Alexander Henry.

■Whore a rocognizauce of special "bail is lost from the files of the Court, and the. plaintiff moves to substitute a copy to stand in lieu of the original, he must give the sureties notice of the motion,; and the Court has no jurisdiction ’ order the substitution to be made without such notice.

*jHeard April 9th.*

*Decided April 22d.*

*20Error to Ingham Circuit. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

*L W.*Longyear, for plaintiffs in error.

*O. M.*Barnes, for defendant in error.

Campbell J.:

This was an action upon a recognizance of special bail, alleged to have been given in a case wherein Robert-Henry was plaintiff and Alexander Montgomery was de-„ fendant.

Upon the trial the original recognizance was not introduced, but only a substituted copy of a recognizance ordered to stand in lieu of the original which was said to be lost. The order of substitution was made upon the application of the plaintiff Henry, upon notice to Alexander Montgomery, No notice was given to the sureties, and they did not appear on the motion. An objection made on this account in the Court below to the introduction of the substituted copy of the recognizance was overruled.

We think the Court below erred in receiving the proofs. The action of the Circuit Court in allowing an alleged copy to be substituted in lieu of the original directly affected the sureties by establishing against them a liability to respond for the debt of another person, without giving them any opportunity to be heard. There was nothing then standing •of record to charge them; and the fact of their liability, which was sought to be fixed by the proceeding, was made out on what was; as to them, an *ex, parte*proceeding, on affidavits. This is against every principle of judicial action. No court can lawfully adjudge any person to be responsible in any shape, without giving him a proper opportunity to be- heard in his own behalf. This notice is necessary to give the court jurisdiction. The so - called amendment relied on was in effect an adjudication that the plaintiffs in error had agreed in due form of law to pay any judgment rendered *21against Alexander Montgomery upon Ms default. They cer-. tainly had a legal right upon such a motion to controvert the allegations of the plaintiff by showing that no lawful recognizance made by them had ever' been on the files of’ the Court.

It is unnecessary to consider any of the other points raised in the case, and we therefore omit any discussion of the ■ questions open on suits of this nature.

The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted.

The other Justices concurred.
No. 38895.

#### Protest 866637-G of J. K. Laudenslager, Inc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of thyme leaves the same as those the subject of *Seeck*v. *United States*(T. D. 47383). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

Inconnection with the Form 10-Q of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. forthe quarter ended March 31, 2009, I, William R. Talley, Jr.,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Frederick CountyBancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledgeand belief, that:

 

(1)          such Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          the information contained in such Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Frederick CountyBancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ William R.  Talley, Jr.                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William R.  Talley, Jr.                          |   |
| Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

March 9, 2012 

via email and regulations.gov 

Esta Rosenberg 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Return of Seven U.S.-Brazil Frequencies 

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0085 

 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) hereby returns to the Department seven of the nine U.S.-Brazil 

frequencies that it was allocated by Notice of Action Taken (“NOAT”) on May 13, 2011 in DOTOST-2011-0085. Delta no longer plans to begin service on the Atlanta-Manaus route for which 

these seven frequencies were intended. 

The above referenced NOAT contained a condition that six of Delta’s nine frequencies may be 

used at any point or points in Brazil, except Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo Terminal; and three 

of Delta’s nine frequencies may be used at any point or points in Brazil, except Sao Paulo 

Terminal. The seven frequencies Delta is returning to the Department are comprised of (a) the 

six frequencies that may used at point or points in Brazil, except Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo 

Terminal and (b) one of three frequencies that may be used at any point or points in Brazil, 

except Sao Paulo Terminal. Delta is using the remaining two frequencies that may be used at 

any point or points in Brazil, except Sao Paulo Terminal. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: brian.hedberg@dot.gov; info@airlineinfo.com; carl.nelson@aa.com; 

dan.weiss@united.com; jonathan.linde@united.com; oracio.marquez@united.com; 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com; howard_kass@usairways.com
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; Amendment of Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of an 
amendment of the meeting of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) 
National Advisory Council (NAC) to be held on March 21.
    Public notice was published in the Federal Register on February 27, 
2007, Volume 72, Number 38, page 8760 announcing that the CSAT National 
Advisory Council would be convening on March 21 and March 22 at 1 Choke 
Cherry Road, Sugarloaf and Seneca Conference Rooms, Rockville, 
Maryland. The date and location of the meeting have changed. The 
meeting will be held at the Hilton Washington DC North/Gaithersburg, 
Salons D & E, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, Maryland on March 21, 
from 8:45 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    The contact for additional information remains as announced.

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Toian Vaughn,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-5148 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
(Reap. Dec. 9526)

#### Rex Rotary Distributing Corp. Lep Transport, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 799736, etc.

(Decided October 28, 1959)

*Joseph S. Seheinberg*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule A, attached to and made part of the decision herein, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain calculating machines exported from Italy.

By stipulation of the parties hereto, it has been agreed that at the time of exportation thereof, such or similar calculating machines were not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Italy, or for export to the United States, or for sale in the principal markets of the United States, and that the cost of production of said merchandise, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402 (f)), is as follows:

> *517Italian lira

> Materials and fabrication_ 66, 871. 30

> General expenses_ 42, 033.17

> Cost of containers (packing), etc_ 1,980.00

> Profit_ 21, 024. 03

> Italian lira_ 131, 908. 50

Upon the agreed facts, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f), supra, is the proper basis of value for the calculating machines in issue and that said value is as set forth in the last preceding paragraph of this decision.

As to any other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
### Attachment VI I

2003 SIP Submittal
Before the Third Division,

May 1, 1961

No. 65552.

#### The May Department Stores Co. *v.*United States,

protests 186263-K, 194745-K, and 219971-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32

 

Section 1350 Certifications

 

 

	I, Andrew K. Walker, certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Allied Bancshares, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Allied Bancshares, Inc.

 

 

s/Andrew K. Walker                                                                  

President and Chief Executive Officer 

 

Date: November 15, 2004

	I, Richard E. Bell, certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Allied Bancshares, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Allied Bancshares, Inc. 

 

s/Richard E. Bell                                                                       

Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

Date: November 15, 2004

18

<PAGE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






The
      undersigned, Terence Yap, the Chief Financial Officer of CHINA
      SECURITY & SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INC .
      (the
“Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:




1.  The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
      15 th day of
      May 2007.




/s/ Terence
              YapTerence
                Yap
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc. and will be retained by China
      Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
      forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------



              Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
     As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge, the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended
September 30, 2003 of Universal Communication Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in such report.

 Date:  June 29, 2004                           /s/ Curtis Orgil
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Curtis Orgil
                                                Chief Financial Officer,
                                                 (Principal Financial and
                                                   Accounting Officer)
No. 44049.

#### Protest 935265-G of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the evidence presented certain items were held dutiable under paragraph 1527 (c) (2) and the French Trade Agreement and other items were held dutiable as smokers’ articles at 60 percent under paragraph 1552 as claimed.
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: March 30, 2011 Meeting with Rubber Ma nufacturers Association on the 2011

NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

On March 30, 2011, EPA met with members of the Rubber Manufactu rers Association (RMA) to

discuss their issues and concerns with the fina l rule entitled, “Identif ication of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That are Solid Waste,” wh ich was published in the Federal Register on March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15456). This is refe rred to as the 2011 NHSM Final Rule.

During that meeting, Tracey Norberg of RMA expr essed concerns with the rule implementation with to regard to off-specification scrap tires that are never placed on vehicles.

Expected Meeting Attendees: Tracey Norberg, RMA

Jim Berlow, EPA George Faison, EPA Michael Galbraith, EPA Tab Tesnau, EPA Marc Thomas, EPA
Exhibit 31 Section 302 Certifications  I, Roger L. Fidler, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 of Global Agri-Med Technologies, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect  to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), and I have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to me.  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of the internal cover over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Dated: November 22, 2006 By: Roger L. Fidler Roger L. Fidler President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer