alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

May 19, 1953

No. 57333.

petition 6938-R (New York).

#### Schreiber Importing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

From the testimony it appeared that the petitioner requested the customs officials to furnish values at which the items in question should be entered'. The customs examiner supplied unit values for the merchandise and instructed the petitioner to add 2 percent, which is the usual rate for the Italian tax. After entry was made, the appraiser advised petitioner that the merchandise in question was subject to the unusual Italian tax rate of 3 percent and that, therefore, there.was deficiency of 1 percent in the amount of such tax paid on entry. On the record presented, it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
(Reap. Dec. 9517)

#### United States *v.*Berndt Holsten

Entry No. CE 858717.

(Decided October 2, 1959)

*George Oochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the involved earthenware figures at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, is as follows:

> Invoiced unit prices, plus 16%%, plus cost of boxes as invoiced.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher export value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein involved at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS EURTHER AGREED that this case may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

*500On tlie agreed facts, I find that the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware figures involved herein, and that such value is the invoiced unit prices, plus 16% per centum, plus cost of boxes, as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 10.16.1

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

FIRST AMENDMENT TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

MARC H. GRABOYES

ThisFIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT(this
"Amendment") is entered into effective as of March 2, 2011, by and betweenALLOS
THERAPEUTICS, INC.(the "Company") andMARC H. GRABOYES("Executive") (collectively, the "Parties").

RECITALS:

WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement on
June 2, 2010 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, modifications are needed to bring the Employment Agreement into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, mutual covenants, the above recitals, and the agreements herein set forth, and for other
good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive hereby agree as follows:







1

---





[Signature Page Follows]

2

---



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have each duly executed thisFIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTeffective as of the date and year first written above.

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.By:

/s/ Paul L. BernsName:

Paul L. BernsTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerEXECUTIVE:/s/ Marc H. Graboyes MARC H. GRABOYES


Signature Page to Second Amendment to
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement

3

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wayne F. Irmiter,  Vice President and  Controller of CE Generation,  LLC (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company  for the annual  period
          ended  December  31,  2003  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated:  February 27, 2004


                              /s/ Wayne F. Irmiter
                              --------------------
                                Wayne F. Irmiter
                          Vice President and Controller
                           (chief accounting officer)
Exhibit 23.02

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-60430, 333-38696, 333-151882,
333-160680 and 333-168436) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-160679) of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. of our
report dated March 1, 2010, relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 3, 2011

---



QuickLinks
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 28, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 28, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0406. MARTIN KENDALL v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15CR73214
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 006

Attachment Name

Attachment 6 LaPbTiZrO Structure

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, le. (Chem 4)

Does not contain CBI

Report Number

CONSi 10317786855351
Attachment 6 LaPbTiZrO Structure REPORT# - CONS 110317786855351

Lanthanum PZT

Trade names: PLZT; High Coupling PZT; LM-55; LM-21

Lanthanum PZT is processed in 160 kg batches, weighing and batching is 4

hrsfbatch, powder break-up and calcine is 8 hrs/batch (exposure time); final mill

and spray dry is 4 lirs/batch. Total process exposure time is 16 hours/batch,

maximum 7 batches/year. See process flow chart for detailed process.

Lanthanum PZT has an infinite repeating crystal structure of the ABO3 Perovskite

structure where A=Pb and La, B= Zr and Ti;

Formula is:

(Pb.90 .98 La.02 -.10)(Zr..60-..7Ti03 .

40) where the Pb + La mole ratio =1.0 and the Zr +

Ti mole ratio =1.00

fW

Constituents:

Lead Oxide 62- 68 wt%

Zirconium dioxide 20-35 wt %

Titanium dioxide 1-IOWt%

Lanthanum trioxide 2-5 wt%
Case 2:04-cv-02575-LKK -DAD Document 21 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 4Case 2:04-cv-02575-LKK -DAD Document 21 Filed 04/19/06 Page 2 of 4Case 2:04-cv-02575-LKK -DAD Document 21 Filed 04/19/06 Page 3 of 4Case 2:04-cv-02575-LKK -DAD Document 21 Filed 04/19/06 Page 4 of 4
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4156

_____________________________
P ETER M. B APTISTE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

. September 19, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , R OWE , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Candice Kaye Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Melissa Joy Ford, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee
, f or Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
### Golden eagle records from the Midwinter Bald Eagle Survey: information for wind energy management and planning

By: Wade EaklePatti HaggertyMark FullerSusan L. Phillips**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds753

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

The purpose of this Data Series report is to provide the occasions, locations, and counts when golden eagles were recorded during the annual Midwinter Bald Eagle Surveys. Golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) are protected by Federal statutes including the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) (16 USC 668-668c) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) (16 USC 703-12). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) manages golden eagles with the goal of maintaining stable or increasing breeding populations (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009). Development for the generation of electricity from wind turbines is occurring in much of the range of the golden eagle in the western United States. Development could threaten population stability because golden eagles might be disturbed by construction and operation of facilities and they are vulnerable to mortality from collisions with wind turbines (Smallwood and Thelander, 2008). Therefore, the Service has proposed a process by which wind energy developers can collect information that could lead to Eagle Conservation Plans (ECP), mitigation, and permitting that allow for golden eagle management in areas of wind energy development (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2011). The Service recommends that ECP be developed in stages, and the first stage is to learn if golden eagles occur at the landscape level where potential wind facilities might be located. Information about where eagles occur can be obtained from technical literature, agency files, and other sources of information including on-line biological databases. The broad North American distribution of golden eagles is known, but there is a paucity of readily available information about intermediate geographic scales and site-specific scales, especially during the winter season (Kochert and others, 2002).
No. 49235.

#### Protests 832973-G/85890, etc., of Wah Ching Lung & Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was assessed and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5 (chemical compounds). The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 54703.

#### Schroeder Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 91010-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Oust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 Nos. 333-37914 and 333-114866 of Genius Products, Inc. and Subsidiaries
of our report dated March 19, 2004, with respect to the financial statements
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Genius Products, Inc. and
Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                        /s/ Cacciamatta Accountancy Corporation

                                            CACCIAMATTA ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION

Irvine, California
July 13, 2004
<page>

									           EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee
Horwitz, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

     (2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partner-
ship.







By:	/s/	Lee Horwitz

Name:		Lee Horwitz
Title:		Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 8, 2007
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-11-0000413 10-JAN-2014 03:15 PM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 27, 2010 

d0419 

Order 

 

April 27, 2010 

140528 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140528 

 COA: 287471 

Wayne CC: 08-004430-FC 

KEVIN RAY WERSTEIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1648

ANTHONY LAMBERT, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,

Chief District Judge. (CA-98-71-2-BO)

Submitted: August 24, 1999 Decided: September 2, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lambert, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Douglas James Brocker,

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lambert, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failing to properly serve process on

Defendant. We have reviewed the record and, although we find no

reversible error, dismissal of the action should have been without

prejudice. See 5A Charles A. Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal

Practice and Procedure § 1353, at 280 (2d ed. 1990); Umbenhauer v.

Woog, 969 F.2d 25, 30 n.6 (3d Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we affirm

as modified to reflect dismissal without prejudice. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 52648.

protests 63412-K, etc. (New York).

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*232Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be coniverted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 58582.

protests 220285-K, etc. (Seattle).

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of magnesium articles similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 316, C. D. 1620) and that said articles are unfinished parts of internal-combustion engines of the carburetor type similar to those involved in *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(41 *462C. C. P. A. 33, C. A. D. 525). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited decisions, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50986

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KANDY ALLEN JACKEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:06-CR-60-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit

Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Kandy Allen

Jackel raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not render

21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
# I/58-/7 ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA# 14-16-00499-CR STYLE: Ex Parte Enrique P. Gomez COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed DATE: July25. 2017 Publish: No 

### OFFENSE: Habeas Corpus COUNTY: Chambers 

### TRIAL COURT: 344th DistrictCourt TC CASE # 14571-B

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS STYLE: Ex Parte Enrique P. Gomez 

# APPELLANTS Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# K^/^3^7) DATE: UVUeTh^^K ^Z 2Jl7 JUDGE: fPt Uuu^— CCA# 

### CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: 

### SIGNED:. PUBLISH: 

# i/y<«/7
PC: DNP:
MOTION FOR FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit 32.1

Certification  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of PARK HILL CAPITAL I CORPORATION (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Francis
Mailhot, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  October 28, 2005

                                    /s/ Francis Mailhot
                                    ------------------------
                                    Francis Mailhot,
                                    Chief Executive Officer
# C_2007064EN.01001801.xml

| 20.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/18

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 64/05)

| Reference number of the aid | XT 6/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Cyprus |
| Region | Κύπρος |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Σχέδιο Στελέχωσης Επιχειρήσεων μέσα από την Αξιοποίηση Αποφοίτων Σχολών Τριτοβάθμιας Εκπαίδευσης [Τίτλος και αριθμός υφιστάμενης ενίσχυσης: Αρχή Ανάπτυξης Ανθρώπινου Δυναμικού — Σχέδιο Στελέχωσης Επιχειρήσεων μέσα από την Αξιοποίηση Αποφοίτων Σχολών Τριτοβάθμιας Εκπαίδευσης (CY 14/2002)] |
| Legal basis | Ο περί Ανάπτυξης Ανθρωπίνου Δυναμικού Νόμος [Νόμος 125(Ι) του 1999, άρθρο 21] |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Budget | Annual budget: CYP 0,18 million; Overall budget: — |
| Intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1.1.2007 |
| Duration | 30.6.2008 |
| Objective | General training |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for training aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Αρχή Ανάπτυξης Ανθρώπινου Δυναμικού Κύπρου |
| Αναβύσσου 2 |
| Στρόβολος, Τ.Θ. 25431 |
| CY-1392 Λευκωσία |

Reference number of the aid

XT 6/07

Member State

Cyprus

Region

Κύπρος

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Σχέδιο Στελέχωσης Επιχειρήσεων μέσα από την Αξιοποίηση Αποφοίτων Σχολών Τριτοβάθμιας Εκπαίδευσης [Τίτλος και αριθμός υφιστάμενης ενίσχυσης: Αρχή Ανάπτυξης Ανθρώπινου Δυναμικού — Σχέδιο Στελέχωσης Επιχειρήσεων μέσα από την Αξιοποίηση Αποφοίτων Σχολών Τριτοβάθμιας Εκπαίδευσης (CY 14/2002)]

Legal basis

Ο περί Ανάπτυξης Ανθρωπίνου Δυναμικού Νόμος [Νόμος 125(Ι) του 1999, άρθρο 21]

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Budget

Annual budget: CYP 0,18 million; Overall budget: —

Intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1.1.2007

Duration

30.6.2008

Objective

General training

Economic sectors

All sectors eligible for training aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Αρχή Ανάπτυξης Ανθρώπινου Δυναμικού Κύπρου

Αναβύσσου 2

Στρόβολος, Τ.Θ. 25431

CY-1392 Λευκωσία

---
No. 45023.

#### Protests 800466-G, etc., of Premier Peat Moss Corp. (Boston).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the-authority of *Peat Import Corp.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 181, C. D. 319) the-claim for free entry under paragraph 1685 was sustained.
No. 52629.

protest 134284-K (New York).

#### Sam Forwand Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.