alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kronos Worldwide,  Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30,  2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, Harold C. Simmons,
Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  and I,  Gregory M.  Swalwell,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Harold C. Simmons
--------------------------
Harold C. Simmons
   Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Gregory M. Swalwell
--------------------------
Gregory M. Swalwell
   Chief Financial Officer


August 3, 2005


Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Molecular Imaging Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for
the year ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Paul J. Crowe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Anthony R. Turnbull, Vice President, Finance of the Company, respectively, do
each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ PAUL J. CROWE                                             
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Paul J. Crowe, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: September 28, 2003



|/s/ ANTHONY R. TURNBULL                     
|--------------------------------------------
|Anthony R. Turnbull, Vice President, Finance



Dated: September 28, 2003



A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Molecular Imaging Corporation and will be retained by Molecular Imaging Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
March 2, 1951

No. 55294. —

#### W. N. Proctor Company *v.*United States,

protest 130049-K.

C. D. 1289. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied by order of Chief Judge Oliver and Judge Cole.

DISSENTING OPINION

Mollison, Judge:

For the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion and for certain of the reasons and grounds stated in the plaintiff’s motion for rehearing and brief in support thereof, I believe that a rehearing and retrial of this case ■ought to be granted.
No. 51470.

#### Protests 119073-K, etc., of Ohio Department of Liquor Control (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the additional breakage the subject of the protests was discovered and determined, as shown by the customs inspection report, while such merchandise was in customs custody during the affixing of strip stamps under customs supervision, prior to the release of such merchandise. It was further agreed that the protests filed against the assessments of. duty be withdrawn, and the case be submitted for decision on the record as to the assessments of internal revenue taxes. An examination of the records failed to disclose anything tending to establish that the assessment of internal revenue taxes was not in accordance with the law or regulations governing such assessments. Inasmuch as the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, had not been overcome, the protests were overruled.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Renfrew,
Inc. for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003, I, Zak W. Elgamal, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Renfrew, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
          30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Renfrew, Inc.

Dated:  November 14, 2003

RENFREW, INC.


By: /s/ Zak W. Elgamal
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5049 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5049

   To modify the definition of disaster in the Small Business Act to 
      include low or no snowfall amounts, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2024

Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Ms. Smith, and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To modify the definition of disaster in the Small Business Act to 
      include low or no snowfall amounts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Winter Recreation Small Business 
Recovery Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF DISASTER.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(k)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 632(k)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(D) below average snowfall or snow cover.''.
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration, in consultation with the Director of the National 
Weather Service, shall promulgate rules to implement the amendment made 
by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
No. 52301.

protests 109508-K/91538, etc. (Chicago, etc.).

#### Gallagher & Ascher Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID RUSSELL HART,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

CIV. S-04-2497-DFL-PAN-PS

ORDER

This matter was referred to the Honorable Peter A.

Nowinski, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§§ 636, et seq., and Local Rule 72-302. On July 28, 2005, Judge

Nowinski recommended that plaintiff’s action be dismissed. No

objections to the findings and recommendation have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

Case 2:04-cv-02497-DFL-PAN Document 13 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 28,

2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed.

DATED: 9/9/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02497-DFL-PAN Document 13 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32 Section 1350 Certifications  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report of Global Agri-Med Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger L. Fidler, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 22, 2006  Roger L. Fidler Roger L. Fidler President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
October 7, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Senator’s Kerry Staff

FROM: Marc Thomas Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

A conference call was held on September 27, 2010 between members of Senator John Kerry’s staff and EPA to discuss how the proposed rule , “Identification of N on-Hazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Wastes (NHSM),” imp acts a series of relate d proposed rules under sections 112 and 129 of the Clean Air Act (C AA), which establish emissions standards for boilers, process heaters, and certa in solid waste incinerators. EPA discussed generally how the proposed rule identifies which non-hazardous seconda ry materials are, or are not, solid wastes

when burned in combustion units. EPA also de scribed how, under the CAA, if a non-hazardous secondary material is not a “solid waste” under RCRA, and is burned in a combustion unit, then

the combustion unit that burns that material woul d be subject to the ap plicable CAA section 112 requirements. On the other hand, if the non-hazardous secondary material is considered a “solid waste,” then the combustion un it that burns the material w ould be subject to the CAA 129 requirements.

List of Meeting Attendees :

Meghan Leahy, Senator Kerry Karena Neubauer, Senator Kerry Michael Ochs, EPA (Region 1, ORA) Raquel Snyder, EPA (OCIR) George Hull, EPA (OSWER) Jim Berlow, EPA (OSWER) Marc Thomas, EPA (OSWER) Bill Maxwell, EPA (OAQPS)
Case No. 7,929.

#### KRAFT v. STOTT.

[1 Hayw. & H. 33.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April 14, 1841.

Damages for Injury to Building — Party Walls.

1. The building regulations will not allow a parts' owning a lot adjoining a frame building to injure the building while digging a foundation for a brick house.

2. A party can build a wall equally on his own and neighbor’s land when his neighbor’s land is vacant.

3. A frame house built on an adjoining lot, previous to the erection of a brick house, will prevent a party from being benefitted by the right secured by the building regulations, that is. the right to lay the wall equally on his own and the adjoining land.

4. Section 4, Building Regulations, No. 1, Oct. 17, 1791, only applies to vacant lots.

At law.

Jos. H. Bradley, for complainant

James Hoban, for defendant.

This is a suit to recover damages for injury to a frame building by reason of the defendant having encroached on the plaintiff’s lot, in digging a foundation for a new brick house at that time about to be erected by the defendant. The defendant’s counsel relied on the building regulations, which provide that in the erection of brick houses the person building may use so many inches of the adjacent lot in proportion to the thickness of the walls of the house thereon to be built, and insisted that the building of a frame house on the adjoining lot, previous to the erection of a brick house, did not affect the right secured by the building regulations. It was also attempted to be shown that the usage of the city established such a right; and several of the most experienced and skillful builders, and some of the oldest citizens, were examined upon that point.

Section 4, Building Regulations, No. 1, October 17, 1791: “That the person, or persons, appointed by the commissioners to superintend the buildings, may enter on the land of any person to set out the foundation and regulate the walls to be built between party and party as to the breadth and thickness thereof, which foundation shall be laid equally upon the lands of the persons between whom such party walls are to be built, and shall be of the breadth and thickness determined by such person proper; and the first builder shall be reimbursed one moiety of the charge of such party wall, or so much thereof as the next *852builder shall have occasion to make use of, before such next builder shall anyway use or break the wall. The charge, or value thereof, to be set by the person or persons so appointed by the commissioners.” Rothwell’s Laws of City of Washington, 4G6.

1

 [Reported by John A. Hayward, Esq., and George C. Hazleton, Esq.]

THE COURT

decided that the building regulations applied only to vacant lots.

Verdict of $220 damages for the plaintiff.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MIGUEL MENDOZA, §

No. 08

- 17

- 00230

- CR

Appellant, §

Appeal from the

v. §

41st District Court

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, of El Paso County, Texas

§

Appellee. (TC# 20140D02819)

§

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible

error in the judgments. We therefore affirm the judgments of the court below. This decision

shall be certified below for observan ce.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Senior Judge

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and McClure, Senior Judge

McClure, Senior Judge (Sitting by Assignment)
# C_2007151EN.01002501.xml

| 5.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/25

---

Corrigendum to the publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 88 of 21 April 2007
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 88 of 21 April 2007

(2007/C 151/09)

On page 11, point 4.1:

for:

‘Λουκουμιού Γεροσκήπου’ (‘Loukoumi Geroskipou’),

read:

‘Λουκούμι Γεροσκήπου’ (‘Loukoumi Geroskipou’).

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LESTER BALDWIN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 442 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of February, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
446 A.2d 685

#### Commonwealth v. Adyseh, Appellant.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied Jan. 17; 1983.

Argued October 27, 1981.

Richard L. Neff, for appellant;

John Lee Brown, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, HESTER and JOHNSON, JJ.

The judgment of sentence is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8180 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8180

 To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 with respect to a 
      civil action relating to the disclosure of intimate images.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2024

   Ms. Mace introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 with respect to a 
      civil action relating to the disclosure of intimate images.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Increased Accountability for 
Nonconsensual Pornography Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTION RELATING TO DISCLOSURE OF INTIMATE IMAGES.

    Section 1309 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (15 
U.S.C. 6851) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``competent,'' 
                after ``conscious,''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (5)(A)--
                            (i) in clause (i), by striking ``or'' at 
                        the end;
                            (ii) in clause (ii)--
                                    (I) in subclause (I), by striking 
                                the semicolon at the end and inserting 
                                ``; or'';
                                    (II) in subclause (II), by striking 
                                ``; or'' and inserting a semicolon; and
                                    (III) by striking subclause (III); 
                                and
                            (iii) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iii) an identifiable individual engaging 
                        in sexually explicit conduct; and''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(3)(A)(i), by striking ``$150,000'' 
        and inserting ``$500,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.2






AMENDMENT NUMBER 5


TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF


HYBRID DYNAMICS CORPORATION





1.           The name of the corporation for which this Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is being filed is Hybrid Dynamics Corporation (the "Corporation").





2.           The original Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, as subsequently amended, were filed on July 22, 1999 (the "Articles of Incorporation").





3.           The Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be amended as follows:





A.           Article I is amended to read as follows:





The name of the Corporation is DAM HOLDINGS INC.





B.           Article IV is amended to add a new subparagraph (d) as follows:





(d)           Upon the later of September 14, 2009 or the date on which this Certificate of Amendment is filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada (the "Effective Date"), every two-hundred (200) shares of common stock, par value $.00015 per share (the "Common Stock"),
of the Corporation issued and outstanding and of record on the books of the Corporation at the close of business on the Effective Date (the "Old Shares") will automatically be converted into one (1) share of Common Stock (the "New Shares") of the Corporation. No fractional shares will be issued, and no cash or other consideration will be issued in lieu thereof.
Exhibit 10.15 - SecondAmendmentForm-CTWaterExecEmpAgmt


Exhibit 10.15


SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT, dated this _____ day of April 2014, is made by and between The Connecticut Water Company, a Connecticut corporation having its principal place of business in Clinton, Connecticut (“Company”), Connecticut Water Service, Inc., a Connecticut corporation and holder of all of the outstanding capital stock of Company (“Parent”), and ____________, a resident of ________, Connecticut (“Employee”),


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, the Employee, Company and Parent entered into an amended and restated Employment Agreement in December 2008; and


WHEREAS, the Employee, Company and Parent, entered into a First Amendment to the Employment Agreement on January 23, 2013; and


WHEREAS, the parties wish to further amend the Agreement in the particulars set forth below;


NOW, THEREFORE, Company, Parent and Employee agree as follows:


1.Subparagraph (g) of Paragraph 5 of the Agreement entitled “Stay-on Bonus” is hereby deleted in its entirety.


2.    Except as hereinabove modified and amended, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Company and Parent have caused this Agreement to be executed by an authorized officer, and Employee has hereunto set Employee’s hand.


THE CONNECTICUT WATER COMPANY 
 
                        By                              
Date 
                        CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC.
 
                        By                             
Date 












 
Date                        Executive
|   | (1) | The      Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the      Registrant for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), to which      this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Herbert Brauner, Respondent, v Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[633 NYS2d 530]

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated June 14, 1994, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs cause of action for compensatory damages.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendants’ motion is granted, and the plaintiffs cause of action for compensatory damages is dismissed.

The defendants’ motion papers made a prima facie showing that the only measure of the plaintiffs damages would be lost profits, and that such damages were incapable of proof with reasonable certainty *(see, Ashland Mgt. v Janien,*82 NY2d 395). It was thereupon incumbent on the plaintiff to produce evidence in admissible form to establish the existence of a material issue of fact. Having only submitted an attorney’s affirmation in opposition, the plaintiff failed to meet his burden *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.