alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1

Certification by the President/Managing Director of Kappa Holding B.V.,
pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

I,
G.P.F. Beurskens, certify that:

|Date: June 27, 2005 |  |        |  |                            
|------------------- |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------
|                    |  | By:    |  | /s/G.P.F. BEURSKENS        
|                    |  | Name:  |  | G.P.F. Beurskens           
|                    |  | Title: |  | President/Managing Director

---



QuickLinks
No. 60894.

#### C. C. Ryder & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 270853-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It appearing that the protest was filed on April 26, 1955, and that the entry was liquidated on May 5, 1955, the protest was dismissed as untimely.
No. 42921.

#### Protests 967562-G, etc., of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the pencil sharpeners and needle threaders in question are chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. Abstracts 41633 and 38680 followed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 12, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00020

- CV

Amber Murray Weisbrod, Appellant

v.

Bobba Lyle Weisbrod, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTI CE JONES, JUSTICES P EMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

Having reviewed the record , the Court holds that Amber Murray Weisbrod has not prosecuted

her appeal and did not comply with a notice from the C le rk of this C ourt. Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this

appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
No. 54707.

#### Paul Breguette Watch Co. *v.*United States,

protests 131220-K, etc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the appraisement of the merchandise and the liquidation of the entries were made in the same manner, under facts and circumstances the same in all material respects, as the appraisement and liquidation in *The Cruen Watch Company*v. *United States*(24 Oust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1216). In accordance with stipulation and following the cited authority the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. It was further held that a legal liquidation should be had which would form the basis for a protest in which, should it so desire, the importer may litigate any questions presented by such action under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Exhibit 32

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Mark Jensen, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer of MGN Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)

the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MGN Technologies, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MGN Technologies, Inc.

Dated: May 22, 2006

*/s/ Mark Jensen*_______________________

Mark Jensen, Chief Executive Officer

and Principal Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to MGN Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by MGN Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

Calendar No. 74 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 479 

[Report No. 118–30] 

To modify the fire management assistance cost share, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2023 

Mr. PADILLA (for himself, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. 

LUJA ́N, and Mr. HEINRICH) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

MAY 16, 2023 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, with amendments 

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To modify the fire management assistance cost share, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fire Suppression and 

5 Response Funding Assurance Act’’. 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 479 RS

1 SEC. 2. FIRE MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE COST SHARE AND 

2 ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 420 of the Robert T. 

4 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

5 (42 U.S.C. 5187) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as sub7 section (g) (f); and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(e) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of assist11 ance under this section shall be not less than 75 percent 

12 of the eligible cost of such assistance. ’’. 

13 ‘‘(f) ELIGIBLE EXPENSE.—A State or local govern14 ment may use assistance provided under this section for 

15 the predeployment of assets and resources.’’. 

16 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub17 section (a) shall only apply to amounts appropriated on 

18 or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

19 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING. 

20 Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment 

21 of this Act, the President, acting through the Adminis22 trator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 

23 shall conduct and complete a rulemaking to provide cri24 teria for the circumstances under which the Administrator 

25 may recommend the President increase the Federal cost 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 479 RS

1 share for section 420 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

2 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5187). 

3 SEC. 4. POLICY UPDATE. 

4 The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Manage5 ment Agency shall update the policy for grants made under 

6 section 420 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

7 Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5187), consistent with 

8 assistance provided under a major disaster and emergency 

9 declaration under that Act, to provide that predeployment 

10 of domestic assets by States, local, and Tribal governments 

11 may be eligible for reimbursement under such section 420. 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 479 

[Report No. 118–30] 

A BILL 

To modify the fire management assistance cost 

share, and for other purposes. 

MAY 16, 2023 

Reported with amendments 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
6785

#### HOLT v. DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF TOWN OF GAFFNEY.

Primary Electiox. — Under a rule governing a primary election, requiring pledges to be filed by candidates five days *before*the election, a pledge filed on the 2d of January is in time for the election on the 7th of January.

Petition by D. J. Holt for writ of certiorari against Thomas B. Butler *et*alcomposing the Democratic Execu*264tive Committee for the town of Gaffney, and W. D. Settlemeyer, in the original jurisdiction oí this Court.

The rules for conducting the primary* election in the town of Gaffney for nomination of municipal officers;, provide that the first election should be held on the seventh' of January, and' that all candidates should file their pledges and pay the assessments five days before the election. The petitioner, a candidate for alderman, filed his pledge and paid -his assessment on the second of January. The town executive 'committee declined to print his name on -the ticket and to' count the votes cast for him because his pledge was not filed in ■time. Twenty-nine votes were cast for petitioner and 'twelve for his opponent, W. D. Settlemeyer.

March *2,*1908.

Per Curiam.

On hearing the petition, affidavits and demurrer herein, it is considered by the Court that the Democratic Executive Committee of the town of Gaffney committed error of lawi in deciding- under the rules of the party the petitioner had not filed his. pledge ‘and paid his assessments within ¡the time required by said rule and was not entitled to be a candidate in the primary election and to have the votes, cast for him therein counted.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the petitioner, D. J. Holt, is entitled to be declared the Democratic nominee for alderman in Ward 1 for the town of Gaffney at the municipal election to ibe held in said town on the 3d day of March, 1908.
Case No. 15,111.

#### UNITED STATES v. FIVE CASES OF LINEN TABLECLOTHS.

[Cited in U. S. v. 10 Cases of Shawls, Case No. 16,448. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Leon Taylor Clark

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2656 LKK CMK P

vs.

Attorney General of California and

The People of the State of California

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma

pauperis.

Examination of the in forma pauperis affidavit reveals that petitioner is unable to

afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is

granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

“A petitioner for habeas corpus relief must name the state officer having custody

of him or her as the respondent to the petition.” Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d

359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994) (citing Rule 2(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254). Petitioner has named the

Attorney General of California and the People of the State of California as respondents in this

action. These individuals are not the proper respondent in this action. Accordingly, the instant

petition must be dismissed with leave to amend. See Stanley, 21 F.3d at 360. 

Case 2:04-cv-02656-LKK -CMK Document 6 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted;

2. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with leave to file

an amended petition within thirty days from the date of this order;

3. Any amended petition must be filed on the form employed by this court, must

name the proper respondent, and must state all claims and prayers for relief on the form. It must

bear the case number assigned to this action and must bear the title “Amended Petition”; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the form for habeas corpus

application.

DATED: May 6, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02656-LKK -CMK Document 6 Filed 05/09/05 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of Corporate Property Associates 16  Global
Incorporated.
  /s/ Gordon F. DuGanGordon F. DuGanChief Executive Officer
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of Corporate Property Associates 16  Global
Incorporated.
  /s/ Mark J. DeCesarisMark J. DeCesarisacting Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                                             0

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JAN-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.000
<CASH>                                           144,011
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      6,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       58,077
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 229,904
<PP&E>                                           117,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (38,877)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   448,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             34,153
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          28,239
<OTHER-SE>                                       385,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     448,302
<SALES>                                          590,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 603,487
<CGS>                                            514,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    745,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  83,919
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (1,461)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (728,849)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (728,849)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.026)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.026)


</TABLE>
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A144
Before the Second Division,

November 16, 1951

No. 56003.

protest 173956-K (New York).

#### Fuchs Shoe Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jorge Castillo, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 136]

—Appeal by the de*555fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered October 31, 1991, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s conviction arises out of an incident in which he demanded money from and then shot and killed Joseph Governale. The proof of the defendant’s guilt was based on the testimony of one eyewitness.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court did not err in permitting Officer Charles Tyrie to testify to statements made by Governale after he was shot. The record supports the conclusion that the statements were made while Governale remained under stress and excitement from the shooting. The statements were therefore admissible pursuant to the hearsay exception for excited utterances *(see, People v Brown,*70 NY2d 513).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 51 (Friday, March 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12595-12596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4837]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the California Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, that a factfinding, planning meeting with 
briefing of the California Advisory Committee will convene at 10 a.m. 
and adjourn at 4 p.m. on Friday, March 23, 2007, at the Federal 
Building, 300 N. Los Angeles Street, Conference Room 8529, Los Angeles, 
California 90012. The purpose of the factfinding, planning meeting with 
briefing is to obtain information for the FY 2008 Statutory Report on 
Religion in Prisons.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning to present a 
statement to the Committee, should contact Thomas V. Pilla, Civil 
Rights Analyst of the Western Regional Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-
894-3435). Hearing impaired persons who will attend the meeting and 
require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act.

[[Page 12596]]

    It was not possible to publish this notice 15 days in advance of 
the meeting date because of internal processing delays.

    Dated at Washington, DC, March 13, 2007.
Ivy L. Davis,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
 [FR Doc. E7-4837 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
No. 62605.

#### Verona Chemical Co. *v.*United States,

protest 328064-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of "Oak Moss Absolute Mousse Extra and Oak Moss Absolute Mousse Verte” and that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GENERAL HOLDING, INC.,

a California corporation, No. CIV.S-04-2749 DFL DAD

 

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

BANCROFT VENTURES LIMITED,

an Isle of Man corporation,

et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636, et seq., and Local Rule 72-302. 

On November 16, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections

to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

///// 

Case 2:04-cv-02749-DFL-DAD Document 53 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 16, 2005, are adopted in

full;

2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is granted;

3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), the court finds no just

reason for delay and directs the entry of default judgment against defendant Bancroft Ventures

Limited (“Bancroft’) on plaintiff’s claims brought against it; and

4. Defendant Bancroft is directed to (1) return to plaintiff 517,705 shares of MDC

Holdings stock, plus any additional shares that may be issued as dividends subsequent to the date

of the judgment entered herein; (2) pay monetary damages of $12,845,755.68; and (3) pay postjudgment interest.

DATED: 12/6/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02749-DFL-DAD Document 53 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Siegal et al., Appellants, *v.*Frank A. Cerra Builders, Inc. et al.

Argued October 8, 1968.

Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.

*627*John E. Evans, Jr.,*with him *Paul L. Hammer,*and *Evans, Ivory & Evans,*for appellants.

*Carl A. Eck,*with him *Richard J. Mills,*and *Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck,*for appellees.

*Daniel B. Winters,*with him *Stein & Winters,*for appellees.

November 12, 1968:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Musmanno did not participate in the decision of this case.
No. 62621.

#### Israel Import Company *v.*United States,

protest 310800-K/8864 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5051 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5051

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
     Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating 
 Washington's Trail--1753 as a national historic trail, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2024

 Mr. Fetterman (for himself, Mr. Kaine, and Mr. Warner) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
     Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating 
 Washington's Trail--1753 as a national historic trail, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Washington's Trail--1753 National 
Historic Trail Feasibility Study Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. WASHINGTON'S TRAIL--1753 NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY 
              STUDY.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(50) Washington's trail--1753.--Washington's Trail--1753, 
        extending approximately 500 miles from Williamsburg, Virginia, 
        to Fort LeBoeuf (now Waterford), Pennsylvania, following the 
        route taken by George Washington and his party on his 
        diplomatic mission to the French on behalf of Virginia Governor 
        Robert Dinwiddie from October 31, 1753, to January 16, 1754, 
        just prior to the start of the French and Indian War (1754-
        1763).''.
                                 <all>
```