alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007290EN.01000701.xml

| 4.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 290/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 290/7

---

Commission communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (1)

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

(2007/C 290/06)

| Organisation | Reference | Edition number | Title of the Community specifications | Edition date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Eurocontrol (2) | Spec-0101 | 1.00 | Eurocontrol Specification for the Initial Flight Plan (3) | 15.7.2007 |

Organisation

Reference

Edition number

Title of the Community specifications

Edition date

Eurocontrol (2)

2

Spec-0101

1.00

Eurocontrol Specification for the Initial Flight Plan (3)

3

15.7.2007

---

(1)  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 26.

1

(2)  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation: Rue de la Fusée 96, B-1130 Brussels, tel. (32-2) 729 90 11, fax (32-2) 729 51 90.

2

(3)  http://www.eurocontrol.int/ses/public/standard_page/sk_community_specs_completed.html

3

---
No. 58593.

protest 227994-K (New York).

#### Stern Glass Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

At the trial, a piece of glass representative of the imported merchandise was received in evidence as exhibit 1, and plaintiff’s witness testified that the articles in question were the same in all material respects as exhibit 1, except that the latter was of domestic make. Counsel for the Government conceded that the merchandise consists of “plate glass made into mirrors, partly finished, * * '* not beveled.” On the record presented,'the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO )

COMPANY, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4007

)

ROSEMARIE C. GRAFFEO, )

individually and as Personal )

Representative of the Estate of )

FRANK GRAFFEO; PHILIP )

MORRIS USA INC., and )

LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed December 6, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Pasco County; Declan P. Mansfield, 

Judge.

Marie Attaway Borland and Troy A. 

Fuhrman of Hill Ward Henderson, 

Tampa; and Charles R.A. Morse of 

Jones Day, New York, New York for 

Appellant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco 

Company.

Maegen P. Luka and Celene H. 

Humphries of Brannock & Humphries, 

Tampa; Eric D. Roslansky of The Ruth 

Law Team, St. Petersburg; Brent R. 

Bigger and Shane A. Newlands of Paul 
- 2 -

Knopf Bigger, PLLC, Tampa, for 

Appellee Rosemarie C. Graffeo.

No appearance for remaining 

Appellees. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
No. 51040.

#### Protests 14946-K, etc., of A. Gluckman, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items of the merchandise consist of manila hemp hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218). Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the merchandise in question was held dutiable as claimed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 5 COMMENTS BY AUDITORS ON CANADA-UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REPORTING DIFFERENCE In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory
paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there are changes in accounting principles that
have a material effect on the comparability of the financial statements of Sun Life Financial Inc.,
such as the changes described in Note 2 to the financial statements. Our report to the shareholders
dated February 14, 2005 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which do not
require a reference to such a change in accounting principles in the auditors report when the
change is properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements. Deloitte & Touche LLP Chartered Accountant
Toronto, Ontario
February 14, 2005
No. 60899.

#### Astoria Pan Americana, Inc., and J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

protest 277179-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ficin powder or *leche de oje en polvo*the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Astoria Pan-Americana, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 243, C. D. 1608), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 13,834.

#### TENNY v. DENSLEY et al.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 314.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1806.

Insolvency — Abbest—Costs—Discharge.

An insolvent debtor will be discharged from arrest for costs accrued partly before and partly after his discharge under the act.

Ca. sa. [by Tenny against Densley Burford] for costs on verdict at December term, 1805, for defendant, Tenny. On the 30th of September, 1805, Densley had been discharged under the insolvent Ihw of 1803 (2 Stat. 237), by the 10th section of which, he is to be discharged if taken on any process or any judgment for any debt, damages, or costs contracted, owing or growing due beiore his discharge. Part of these costs were growing due or were contracted before his discharge. The defendant, Dens-ley, was discharged by the court on that ground. (DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent.)
No. 55986.

protests 143401-K/1730 and 145157-K/1963 (Chicago).

#### Naumes Forwarding Service and W. C. Sullivan & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Desert Health Products, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004,, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Johnny Shannon
    ----------------------
Johnny Shannon                  Date: April 15, 2005
Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002


                                                                               1
Searched for **http://www.usbg.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.usbg.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### Jeffrey S. Rotsko, Respondent, v Donald H. Rice, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 907]

—Amended judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, Supreme Court’s conclusions that plaintiff has a valid mechanic’s lien on defendant’s property, is entitled to a judgment of $135,386.24 plus interest, and is entitled to enforcement of his mechanic’s lien, could not have been " 'reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence’ ” *(Thoreson v Penthouse Inti.,*179 AD2d 29, 31, *affd*80 NY2d 490) and must be set aside.

The proof establishes that the agreement of the parties, memorialized by plaintiffs letters to defendant dated October 11, 1990 and March 22, 1991, was a "not to exceed” contract, *916whereby plaintiff agreed to construct defendant’s residence at a guaranteed maximum price of $300,000. Contrary to the conclusion of the court, the contract is neither ambiguous *(see, Tigue v Commercial Life Ins. Co.,*219 AD2d 820) nor did it evolve into a "time and materials” contract. While plaintiff billed defendant on a time and materials basis, he acknowledged that he agreed to construct defendant’s residence within the $300,000 budget. Thus, plaintiff’s recovery is limited to the amount set forth in the parties’ agreement.

The court’s dismissal of defendant’s counterclaims "for insufficient proof’ is supported by the record.

Therefore, we modify the amended judgment on appeal by deleting therefrom those portions awarding plaintiff judgment against defendant, determining that plaintiff has a valid mechanic’s lien, and directing enforcement of the lien by foreclosure. (Appeal from Amended Judgment of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ward, J.—Mechanic’s Lien.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Davis, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          Subsidiaries of OpenTV Corp.
                          ----------------------------
                             As of December 31, 2003

A table of the direct and indirect subsidiaries of OpenTV Corp. is set forth
below, indicating as to each the state or jurisdiction of organization and the
names under which such subsidiaries do business. Subsidiaries not included in
the table are inactive or, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary,
would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

Name of the Subsidiary                              Jurisdiction of Organization
---------------------------                         ----------------------------
ACTV, Inc.                                          United States (Delaware)
ACTV Entertainment, Inc.                            United States (New York)
Advision LLC                                        United States (Delaware)
BettingCorp. UK Ltd.                                United Kingdom
Digital Adco                                        United States (Delaware)
HyperTV Networks                                    United States (Delaware)
Intellocity USA, Inc.                               United States (Delaware)
Media Online Services                               United States (Delaware)
OpenGaming (Israel) Ltd.                            Israel
OpenPlay BVI Ltd.                                   British Virgin Islands
OpenTV AG                                           Switzerland
OpenTV Asia Pacific KK                              Japan
OpenTV Australia Pty Ltd                            Australia (New South Wales)
OpenTV Europe S.A.S.                                France
OpenTV Holding NV                                   Netherlands Antilles
OpenTV Holdings BV                                  The Netherlands
OpenTV Iberia SL                                    Spain
OpenTV, Inc.                                        United States (Delaware)
OpenTV Interactive Software (Beijing) Co. Ltd.      China
OpenTV UK Limited                                   United Kingdom
OpenTV US Holdings, Inc.                            United States (Delaware)
OpenTV US Investments, Inc.                         United States (Delaware)
Spyglass, Inc.                                      United States (Delaware)
Spyglass Integration, Inc.                          United States (Delaware)
Static 2358 France SARL                             France
Static 2358 Holdings Limited                        United Kingdom
Static 2358, Inc.                                   United States (California)
Static 2358 Limited                                 United Kingdom
Wink Communications, Inc.                           United States (Delaware)
4G Media Ltd.                                       British Virgin Islands
4G Media Ltd.                                       Turks and Caicos
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2018 (the “Report”) of Oxford Square Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce L. Rubin, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Bruce L. Rubin   | 
|-------------------- | 
|Name: Bruce L. Rubin | 
|Date:  May 2, 2018   |
Before the Second Division,

January 7, 1942

No. 46777.

#### Protest 989057-G of Schlesinger & Gintel (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that the woven silk mufflers have been hemmed. In accordance therewith the claim under paragraph 1209 was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/Patrick F. ConroyName: Patrick F. Conroy Date: August 8, 2014
July 14, 1943

No. 48571.

Suit 4427.

#### *United States*v. *Otis McAllister*& *Co.*

C. D. 699 reversed May 18, 1943. C. A. D. 242.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADDED BY****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven C. Ackmann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.
| Date:  March 13, 2007 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Steven C.  Ackmann |                                  |   |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                            |   |   |   |                   | Steven C. Ackmann,                    |   |   |
|                            |   |   |   |                   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                 |        |        |        |                        |                                       |        |        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

82

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50542-50543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20546]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7984]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``New Photography 2012: Michele Abeles, Birdhead (Ji 
Weiyu and Song Tao), Anne Collier, Zoe Crosher, and Shirana Shahbazi''

Summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``New Photography 2012: Michele Abeles, 
Birdhead (Ji Weiyu and Song Tao), Anne Collier, Zoe Crosher, and 
Shirana Shahbazi,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Museum of Modern Art in New York, New York from 
on or about October 3, 2012, until on or about February 4, 2013, with a 
preview on October 2, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-

[[Page 50543]]

5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 8, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-20546 Filed 8-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK SCOTT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2742 DFL JFM P

vs.

SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR

MUNICIPAL COURT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 25, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-02742-DFL -JFM Document 11 Filed 06/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 25, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

DATED: 6/10/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02742-DFL -JFM Document 11 Filed 06/14/05 Page 2 of 2
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

71–986 2001

107th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–60

AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES

OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURES

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE THAT HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE COURT, PURSUANT

TO 28 U.S.C. 2075

APRIL 24, 2001.—Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and ordered

to be printed

(1)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES,

Washington, DC, April 23, 2001.

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT,

Speaker of the House of Representatives,

Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: By direction of the Supreme Court of the

United States, I have the honor to submit to the Congress the

amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure that

have been adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States pursuant to Section 2075 of Title 28, United States Code.

Accompanying these rules are excerpts from the report of the Judicial Conference of the United States containing the Committee

Notes submitted to the Court for its consideration pursuant to Section 331 of Title 28, United States Code.

Sincerely,

WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST.

(3)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42
#### FRANK P. MANCINO, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. AMERICAN LEASING CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

*Mr. William A. Dietrich*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Blume & Blume*for the respondent.

April 30, 1962.
Exhibit 10.33 - Merck letter






[*] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


Exhibit 10.33


December 3, 2014


Greg Fersko
Director, Business Development and Licensing
Merck & Co., Inc.
2000 Galloping Hill Road
Kenilworth, NJ 07033


Re:  Deferral of Milestone due under the Termination and License Agreement between Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (“Merck”) and SCYNEXIS, Inc.  
(Scynexis) dated May 24, 2013 (the “Agreement”); Merck Reference  
SCYNEXIS LKR143197


Dear Greg, 


As we have discussed, Scynexis is seeking deferral of the accrual of the $[*] milestone due under Section 5.1 (a) of the Agreement, such that no amount will be due upon Initiation of the first Phase II Clinical Trial for Product, but under Section 5.1 (b) of the Agreement, $[*] (instead of $[*]) would be due upon Initiation of the first Phase III Clinical Trial for Product.  


Except as expressly stated above, all other terms and provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.


We sincerely appreciate the spirit of cooperation and collaboration which Merck demonstrated throughout our collaboration project, and which continues with Merck’s agreement to this deferral. 


Sincerely, 


/s/ Yves, J. Ribiell


Yves J. Ribeill
President and CEO








The deferral described above is agreed:




By:___/s/ Iain Dukes  12/11/14________


Name:___Iain Dukes________________


Title:___SVP, Research Science_______
Case 2:05-cr-00018-EJG   Document 38    Filed 05/22/06   Page 1 of 3

Case 2:05-cr-00018-EJG   Document 38    Filed 05/22/06   Page 2 of 3

Case 2:05-cr-00018-EJG   Document 38    Filed 05/22/06   Page 3 of 3

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-24T19:48:22-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO