alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Memorandum Opinion filed Octo ber 20, 2015, Withdrawn; Appeal

Reinstated; Motion Denied; and Order Filed October 27 , 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00437

- CV

____________ RICHARD A. DUNSMORE , Appellant

V.

MADELINE ORTIZ, ET AL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 76312

- I



### ORDER
This court notified the parties on September 29 , 2015 , of its intent to dismiss the appeal for appellant’s failure to comply with Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 14.004, unless any party showed meritorious grounds for continuing the appeal by October 9, 2015 . Having received no response to that notice, th e court issued an opinion dismissing this appeal on October 20, 2015.Just after the opinion was issued, the court received documents from the

appellant in an envelope postmarked October 7, 2015. The documents substantially comply with the requirements of section 14.004.
Accordingly, the opinion filed October 20 , 2015, is WITHDRAWN , and our judgment of that date is VACATED . The appeal is ordered REINSTATED

. Appellant’s motion to be appointed an attorney, filed August 11, 2015, was denied as moot on October 15, 2015. We WITHDRAW our ruling of October 15, 2015, and now DENY that motion.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.7

                            (Marcus & Millichap LOGO)

                         ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT

This document is an addendum ("Addendum") to the Purchase Agreement
("Agreement") between NNN VF Southwood Tower, LP ("Seller") and Rancho Pacific
Development and/or related assignee ("Buyer") executed by Buyer on the 9th day
of September, 2005 for that certain real property located at 19221 Interstate
45, Shenandoah, TX.

The provisions of this Addendum are hereby added to and incorporated in the
Terms and Conditions in the aforementioned Agreement.

     1.   Buyer shall have until October, 19, 2005 to approve or disapprove of
          Due Dilligence Inspection.

All other terms and conditions remain the same.

                                   ACCEPTANCE

The undersigned Buyer, Seller and Agent accept and agree to the foregoing.


BUYER: Illegible                       DATE:
       -----------------------------         ------------------------------
       Rancho Pacific Development


SELLER: Illegible                      DATE:
        ----------------------------         ------------------------------
        NNN VF Southwood Tower

AGENT: MARCUS & MILLICHAP REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT BROKERAGE COMPANY


BY:                                    DATE:
    --------------------------------         ------------------------------
    Alex Garcia

NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE BY AGENT AS TO THE LEGAL EFFECT OR VALIDITY OF ANY
PROVISION OF THIS ADDENDUM. A REAL ESTATE BROKER IS QUALIFIED TO GIVE ADVICE ON
REAL ESTATE MATTERS. IF YOU DESIRE LEGAL, FINANCIAL OR TAX ADVICE, CONSULT YOUR
ATTORNEY, ACCOUNTANT OR TAX ADVISOR.

_______, prchaden 10-4-05

                      Buyer's Initials __________ Seller's Initials ____________
                                        CA - Copyright Marcus and Millichap 2005


                                     1 of 1
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 
  

			
	[BNP Paribas Fortis logo]		 BNP Paribas Fortis-nv
 Specialised Financing
Europe - Agency
 Warandeberg 3 (1KG1F)
 B-1000
Brussels


 AM/1KG1F 
 TO: 

Anheuser-Bush Inbev SA/NV (as “Company”, “Original Borrower” and “Original Guarantor”) 

 

			
	 Our reference
 ABI/AM/1KG1F
		 Date
 20 August 2013


 Dear Sirs, 
 Senior
Facilities Agreement dated 26 February 2010 between Anheusher-Bush Inbev SA/NV as the Company and BNP Paribas Fortis NV/SA as the Agent, as amended on 23 June 2011 (the “Senior Facilities Agreement”). 

Terms defined in the Senior Facilities Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this letter. 

We refer to the request made by Anheuser-Bush Inbev SA/NV dated 1 August 2013 (the “Extension Request”) regarding the extension of the
Termination Date and we, BNP Paribas Fortis NV/SA as Agent, hereby confirm that the following Lender(s) 
  

	•	 	have agreed to the requested extension until 25 July 2018: BNP Paribas Fortis nv/sa, BNP Paribas New York Branch, Australia & New Zealand Banking Group LTD, Banco Santander SA, Banco Santander SA New York
Branch, Bank of America Merrill Lynch NA, the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ LTD, Barclays Bank PLC, Commerzbank AG, Deutsche Bank Luxembourg SA, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, ING Belgium NV/SA, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Mizuho Bank Nederland N.V.,
Morgan Stanley Bank NA, Rabobank International, Société Générale, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking, TD Bank Europe LTD, The Bank of New York Mellon, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Toronto Dominion Bank, Unicredit Bank Austria AG


  

	•	 	has agreed to an extension until 25 July 2017: Export Development Canada 

  

	•	 	have refused or have been deemed to have refused the extension and will cease to be a Lender as from 25 July 2016: Intesa San Paolo and US Bank National Association. 


Yours faithfully, 
  

			
	/s/ De Vroegh Gabrielle		/s/ Guido Van den Berghe
		
	De Vroegh Gabrielle		Guido Van den Berghe
	Agency Officer		Head Agency
	Specialised Financing Europe		Specialised Financing Europe

  

			
			
BNP Paribas Fortis sa-nv, Warandeberg 3, B-1000 
Brussels        
 RPM/RPR Brussels – VAT BE 0403.199.702

Broker approved under CBFA No 25.879
No. 51765.

#### Protest 49026-K of J. Ossola Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated -that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to the Provolone cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706). In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector- in computing the duty thereon *212to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protest was sustained to this extent.
National Archives and Records Administration

Office afthe Federal Register

November 24, 20 I0

FAA

'800 Independence Avenue, SW

Room 915 J, Regulations Division

Waslungton, DC 20591

ATTN: Nancy Molitor, FAA Liaison Officer for the Federal Register

Dear Ms. Molitor:

TlJe 1llaterl,i! listeJ ;n the atl<lehrnc:nlis approved for incorporation by reference in 14 CFR Part 39.

This approval is contingent upon the final nile containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by

our staffs. The approval to incorporate by reference this publication(s) is effective on the effective date of your

fmal rule. Tfyou wish to enforce some other edition of tbe publication(s) approved, you must:

1. Publish notice orthe change m the Federal Register, and amend the Code of Federal Regulations; and

2 Ensure that a copy of that edition is on file at the Office of the Pederal Register; and

3_ Notify me in writing of the change.

Federal Register Attorney:;(Iul

Attachment

us. mail address: 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740..0001

Office location: 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20002-4244

Federal Rl'gi5tcr web sites: http) jwww.archives.gov/f<,'dcfal-regi5tcfillld http:! jwww,gpoaccessgov/nafa
incorporation by Reference

Docket .f"lo.FAA-2007-28348; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-060-AD; AmendmenI39-/6530.- AD 20/0-24-11

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Service Bulletin 737-

57A1279

Revision 2 02/02/2010

Docket No. FAA-2009-1067: Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-071-AD; Amel1dmenl39-16516; AD 2010-23-26

Airbus A300

Airbus A300

Airbus A300

Airbus A300

Airbus A300

Airbus A300

Airbus A300

Mandatory Service

Bulletin A300-57-0254

Mandatory Service

Bulletin A300-57-61i0,

including Appelldix 1

Mandatory Service Revision 4

Bulletin A300-57A0246,

including Appendices 1

and 2

Mandatory Service Revision 3

Bulletin A300-57A0246,

including Appendices 1

,and 2

Mandatory SeNiee Revision 5

Bulletin A300-57A6087,

including Appendix 1

Mandatory Service Revision 4

Bulletin A300-57 A6i01,

including Appendices 1

and 2

Malldatory Service Revision 3

Bulletin A300-57 A61 01,

including Appendices 1

and 2

06104/2010

06/07/2010

0910912009

0311112009

03/1012008

09/09/2009

03/11/2009

Docket IVo.FAA-20JO-V735 Directorate Idel1l{fier 2010-CE-030-AD: Amendment 39-16529; AD 2010-24-JO

Societe Nouvelle Centrair

Printer! /1/24/2010

Service Bulletin No,

10'-29

07/30/2009

Page lofl
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 10, 2010
    /s/ Heath B. ClarkeHeath B. ClarkeChief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) and Chairman/s/ Brenda AgiusBrenda AgiusChief Financial Officer (principal financial
and accounting officer) and Secretary
EX-10.3D



 Exhibit 10.3(d) 

June 1, 2014 
 Aventis Asset Management, LLC 

2150 E. Lake Cook Road, Suite 720 
 Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 

Attention: Mr. Steve Hwang 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr. Hwang: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2015 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	Commodity Advisors Fund LP. 

  

	 	•	 	MB Master Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	MSSB Spectrum Strategic L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Managed Futures Premier Aventis II, L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Managed Futures Premier Aventis L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	MSMF Custom Solutions Fund L.P. 

 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mrs. Alice Lonero at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1304. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:		 /s/ Alice Lonero

			 Alice Lonero

			Chief Financial Officer
	
	AVENTIS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC
		
	By:		 /s/ Steve Hwang



			
	Print Name:		 Steve Hwang


 AL/sr
Mat 21, 1964

A.R.D. 177.

reappraisement 290448-A, etc.

#### United States *v.*Clay*ton*Chemical & Packaging Company,

#### Phenidone—United States Value.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., A.R.D. 169. • Motion by appellant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,552,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,167,941
<PP&E>                                       3,550,399
<DEPRECIATION>                                 459,428
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,456,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,880,838
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,628,500
<COMMON>                                        58,677
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,643,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,456,016
<SALES>                                      2,133,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,133,289
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,160,344
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,457,945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             320,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,513,973)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,513,973)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,513,973)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.78)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.2
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: January 16, 2009
    /s/ Lai Ni QuiaqueName:
    Lai Ni QuiaqueTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
Order entered June 3, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00138-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.J.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-15124

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s June 2, 2015 motion for an extension of time to file the 

clerk’s record and reporter’s record. Appellant asks for an extension “until the Supreme Court 

rules on Appellant’s indigence in the Writ of Mandamus.” On May 29, 2015, the Texas 

Supreme Court denied appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we GRANT

appellant’s motion to the extent that the clerk’s record and reporter’s record shall be filed by 

JULY 3, 2015. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic 

transmission to Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, Francheska Duffey, Official Court 

Reporter for the 330th Judicial District Court, appellant, and counsel for appellee.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
No. 55313.

#### Amcu Trading-Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 162522-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
*

Honorable Arthur L. Alarcon, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by

designation. 

 1Plaintiff's other arguments on appeal are without merit and warrant no discussion. 

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 96-7034.

Patricia DAVID, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC., William Thomas, National

Assistance Bureau, Inc., a.k.a. Gardendale Nursing Home, Defendants-Appellees.

Aug. 29, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. CV-95-B-6-

S), Sharon Lovelace Blackburn, Judge.

Before ANDERSON and COX, Circuit Judges, and ALARCON*

, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

With respect to the summary judgment in favor of SmithKline, we assume arguendo, but

need not decide, that an employer may be liable under some circumstances in a case involving

harassment of an employee, not by the employer or its employees, but by a third person. However,

we conclude on this record that SmithKline's response to plaintiff's reports of harassment was

reasonable in light of the options available to SmithKline.1

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part:

I concur in the judgment affirming the grant of summary judgment in favor of all defendants

except SmithKline. Although I recognize that SmithKline's options were limited because the

harasser was a customer and not an employee, and although I acknowledge this is a close question,

I would conclude that the record discloses a genuine issue of fact as to whether SmithKline's

response to the harassment was reasonable.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Cano Petroleum, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Morris B. Smith,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in theReport.

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuantto Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 202 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| February 8, 2008 |
|-----------------------|
|                  |   |
|                  |   |
|                  | /s/ Morris B. Smith |   |
|                  | Morris B. Smith |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 8

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

----------------------------   -------------------    ----------     ----------
                                                    PROPORTION OF    PORTION OF
                                   COUNTRY OF         OWNERSHIP       VOTING
        NAME                      INCORPORATION        INTEREST      POWER HELD
----------------------------   -------------------    ----------     ----------
METALINK INC.*                    United States              100%           100%
----------------------------   -------------------    ----------     ----------
METALINK ASIA PACIFIC LTD.*           Korea                  100%           100%
----------------------------   -------------------    ----------     ----------
METALINK INTERNATIONAL LTD.*       Republic of
                                   Seychelles                100%           100%
----------------------------   -------------------    ----------     ----------
METALINK JAPAN K.K.*                  Japan                  100%           100%
----------------------------   -------------------    ----------     ----------

     * CURRENTLY INACTIVE
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 23, 2022

NO. 03-21-00241-CR

Christopher Alexander Garza, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in 

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### F. Adams, by his next friend, L. S. Adams, v. W. A. Saunders, individually and as Administrator of the estate of N. Adams, deceased; Albert F. Saunders; Mrs. Julie S. Dickerson, joined by her husband, R. G. Dickerson; Mrs. Minnie A. Strickland, joined by her husband, A. J. Strickland; The Barnett National Bank of Jacksonville; The Barnett National Securities Corporation; The Barnett National Company; and Adams Brothers, Inc.

180 So. 903.

Order Entered April 27, 1938.

*495
      *Stafford Caldivell*and *C. C. Howell,*for Appellants;

*F. B. Harrell, J. B. Hodges*and *Jennings & Waits,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the Court upon motion of Counsel for Appellees for an order modifying the supersedeas order heretofore granted in the cause, and the Court having heard argument of Counsel for the respective parties upon the said motion, it is thereupon ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said motion to modify the supersedeas order herein be and it is hereby denied without prejudice to the right of the Appellees to renew the application, upon a stipulation being entered into between Counsel for the respective parties as to the specific properties to be segregated and as to the specific properties to be continued under the operation of the injunction herein, such stipulation and further. application for modification of the supersedeas order to be submitted to the Honorable Hal W. Adams, Circuit Judge, with authority to the said Circuit Judge to enter an appropriate order in the premises notwithstanding the appeal herein.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 11 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarter  ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper,
Jr.,  President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 9, 2004