alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Allan Weiss, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elderwatch, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuers internal control over financial reporting.



5. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditor and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



By/s/ Allan Weiss

Allan Weiss

Principal Accounting Officer



Date:  November 15, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of East Coast Diversified Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Frank Rovito, CEO and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Frank Rovito

Frank RovitoCEO and CFODated: December 22, 2008

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to East Coast Diversified Corporationand will be retained by East Coast Diversified Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 55308.

#### A. A. Choopani et al. *v.*United States,

protests 156413-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the First Division,

September 22, 1949

No. 53570.

protest 147916-K (New York).

#### G. D. Searle & Co. *v.*United States,

*170Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of concentrated ox gall the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY CHATMAN, No. CIV-S-04-2655 MCE/GGH P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, ET AL., 

Defendants.

____________________________/

 

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On June 14, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-02655-MCE -GGH Document 19 Filed 07/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 14, 2005,

are adopted in full; and 

2. The claims against defendants Smith, Jorgensen, Davis,

Featherson, Mashburn and Atkins contained in the March 15, 2005,

second amended complaint are dismissed. 

DATE: July 21, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:04-cv-02655-MCE -GGH Document 19 Filed 07/21/05 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 10147)

#### Herbert Kann Company, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 774050.

(Decided January 23, 1962)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*William S. Orriok, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement involves footwear in chief value of rubber, imported from Japan on or about September 11,1959.

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeal for decision upon stipulation, upon the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved and that such value, in each instance, is the invoice unit price, plus, prorated, the items identified on the invoice as inland freight and insurance, storage and hauling, lighterage and loading, and “other shipping charges.”

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

The
Board of Directors
divine, inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-69354, 333-73362, 333-74412, and 333-81178) and Form S-8
(Nos. 333-41184, 333-52262, 333-54698, 333-62882, 333-74356, 333-81186, 333-81188, and 333-81196) of divine, inc. of our report dated March 29, 2002, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of divine, inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the period from May 7, 1999 (inception) through December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on
Form 10-K of divine, inc.

/s/KPMG LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
March 29, 2002

---

QuickLinks
Before the Second Division,

July 30, 1942

No. 47421.

#### Protest 68506-K of I. Magnin *&*Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with agreement of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 46985 the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 was sustained.
Exhibit 13.1


April 14, 2005

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to
be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not
constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the "Report") accompanying
this letter.

     Joaquin Faura Battle, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Terra
Networks, S.A. and Elias Rodriguez-Vina Cancio, the Chief Financial Officer of
Terra Networks, S.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

     1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Terra
Networks, S.A.

                                           /s/ Joaquin Faura Battle
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Joaquin Faura Battle
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ Elias Rodriguez-Vina Cancio
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Elias Rodriguez-Vina Cancio
                                           Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to us and will be
retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Attachment A

Example PFD Showing numbers and illustrative locations of PRDs, OEVLs, and SCPs

: CVS starts where all waste gas streams are manifolded together

: VCM gas stream to/from VCM Recovery System

: PVC MACT “Process Vent”

 

 Purple outline blocks are presumed to not be in HAP service

Numbers of P = PRDs, O = OEVLs, and S – SCPs shown in small red font 

SD1

VC Storage

Storage 

Vessel Vent

10-P, 50-O, 10-S

Unloading

Misc Vent

Holding Tank

Batch PV

10-P, 100-O, 10-S

Weighing Tank

Batch PV

2-P, 50-O, 5-S

Polymerization

Reactor

Batch PV

20-P, 200-O, 20-S

Polymer

Stripping Vessel

Batch or 

Continuous PV

10-P, 200-O, 20-S

Knock-out

Pot

Continuous PV

5-P, 20-O, 5-S

VC Recovery

System

Continuous PV

10-P, 100-O, 10-S

Blend Tanks

5-P, 100-O, 20-S

Cyclone & or Drying

Screening

PVC Storage 

& Shipping

Process Steps

SD1. VC Unloading and Storage

SD2. Mixing, Weighing and Holding

SD3. Polymerization Reaction

SD4. Resin Stripping

SD5. Recovery System

SD6. Blending

SD7. Drying

SD8. PVC Storage

SD9. “In Process” Wastewater Stripping

SD10. Control Device System (e.g. Incinerator)

To 

Wastewater 

Stripper

Centrifuge

Control 

Device

Caustic

Nat. Gas

Water

“In Process” wastewater

1) H2O from Double Mechanical Seals 

on all Pumps, Compressors and 

Agitators

2) H2O from Reactor Evacuating Prior 

to Opening

3) Knock-Out Pots

Wastewater

Stripper

“In Process” 

Wastewater

To 

Wastewater Treatment

To Incinerator/

Scrubber and/or

Recovery

Continuous PV

Steam

5-P, 50-O, 5-S

SD6

SD3

SD2 SD5

SD7 - 5-P, 50-O, 5-S

SD10

SD4

SD9

SD8

Waste Gas Stream 

from all PVC 

production 

equipment

PVC MACT 

Process Vent

1-P, 20-O, 2-S

“

Closed 

Vent 

System

Process 

Vent 

“Table 1” 

Limits

5-P, 100-O, 5-S
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


WITH
      RESPECT TO THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY
      31,
      2006 OF STRATEGY INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP, INC.





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Strategy International Insurance Group, Inc., a Texas
      corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge
      that:





1.
            The
                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31,
                2006 (the“Form
                10-QSB”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                Securities ExchangeAct
                of 1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
                material
                respects, thefinancial
                condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Stephen
      Stonhill


Name:
      Stephen Stonhill


Title:
      Chief Executive Officer





March
      31,
      2006





/s/
      Louis
      Lettieri


Name:
      Louis Lettieri


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer





March
      31,
      2006




The
      certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as
      part
      of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the
      certifying officers.
Response to Comments for the Clean Water Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States”

The Response to Comments Document, together with the preamble to the final Clean Water Rule, 

presents the responses of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of the Army 

(collectively “the agencies”) to the more than one million public comments received on the proposed 

rule (79 FR 22188 (Apr. 21, 2014)). The agencies have addressed all significant issues raised in the 

public comments.

Because of the volume of comments received, the Response to Comment Document is presented in a 

number of different topical compendiums. Each of these compendiums is available as attachments to 

this docket entry. The compendiums were numbered for convenience based on the database used to track 

incoming comments, and no particular meaning is intended by the numbering system. In total, all of 

these compendiums represent the agencies’ formal Response to Comment Document.

These compendiums have been formatted to be compliant with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, 

which requires Federal agencies to make their electronic and information technology accessible to 

people with disabilities. In addition, the compendiums have been reformatted to ensure margins, 

typeface, comment and response numbers, and identification of pictures with text are consistent 

throughout. There have been no changes to the content or substance of the Response to Comment 

document that was prepared at signature of the Clean Water Rule. 

The Response to Comments Document, together with the preamble to the Clean Water Rule and the

information contained in the Technical Support Document, the Science Report, and the rest of the 

administrative record should be considered collectively as the agencies’ response to all of the significant 

comments submitted on the proposed rule. Where there are slight differences, the language in the final 

preamble and rule controls and should be used for purposes of understanding the scope, requirements, 

and basis of the final rule.
EX-32.1  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  INFe- HUMAN RESOURCES, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of INFe- Human Resources, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur Viola, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of INFe- Human Resources, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of INFe-Human Resources, Inc.  /s/    ARTHUR VIOLA - -------------------- Arthur Viola  Chief Executive Officer Sole Director and Chief Financial Officer  July 24, 2006
No. 52999.

#### Schenley Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 135160-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols*& *Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
No. 52292.

protests 72167-K and 72168-K (New York).

#### Leonard Gordon Importation Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the record the court was unable to find anything sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protests were therefore overruled.
No. 63135.

#### The Spiegel Bros. Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 58/11472 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the principles herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that one case of pliers, reported by tbe inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon tbe one ease of pliers, which was reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
May 22 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LEON THOMAS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00913

- CV V.

CHANDRA JONES , Appellee

__________________________ ______ Today the Court heard the parties ’ agreed motion to vacate the judgment signe d by the court below on August 2 2, 2012 , made final by an order of severance signed September 13, 2012 . Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the judgment VACAT ED AND REMAND the cause to the trial court for proceedings in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement

. We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.
We further order that mandate be issued immedi ately.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
No. 64187.

protests 58/22764, etc. (New York).

#### Aimcee Wholesale Corp. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N.Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Last updated, March 25, 2009 

 

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990, AS AMENDED

 

Following is the current text of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 [ADA], including 

changes made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-325), which became effective 

on January 1, 2009. The ADA was originally enacted in public law format and later rearranged

and published in the United States Code. 

The United States Code is divided into titles and chapters that classify laws according to their

subject matter. Titles I, II, III, and V of the original law are codified in Title 42, chapter 126, of 

the United States Code beginning at section 12101. Title IV of the original law is codified in 

Title 47, chapter 5, of the United States Code. Since this codification resulted in changes in 

the numbering system, the Table of Contents provides the section numbers of the ADA as 

originally enacted in brackets after the codified section numbers and headings. 

Three versions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended are provided 

below. The first is the text with the amendments incorporated. The second version shows the 

text with the amendments highlighted by strike through text for deletions and bold text for 

additions. The third version shows the same highlighted content with additional coding for 

people who use screen readers. 

Current text of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 incorporating the 

changes made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. (HTML) | (PDF)

Text showing the changes to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 made by 

the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 with deleted language shown as strike through 

font and new language shown in bold font. (HTML)

Text showing the changes to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 made by 

the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 with deleted language shown as strike through 

font and new language shown in bold font with coding for access by people who use 

screen readers. (HTML) 

Text of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, before changes made by the ADA 

Amendments Act of 2008 (HTML) [archive]. 

 

 

ADA Publications | Enforcement | Site Map | Search

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990, AS AMENDED Page 1 of 1

http://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.htm 7/1/2013
# C_2007262EN.01001201.xml

| 1.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/12

---

Annual Report 2006

(2007/C 262/11)

The European Ombudsman has presented his Annual Report for the year 2006 to the European Parliament, in accordance with Article 195(1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 3(8) of the Decision of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the performance of the Ombudsman's Duties.

The Annual Report as well as a shorter version containing only the Executive Summary and the Statistics are available on the European Ombudsman's website in all 23 official languages at:

http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu

Paper copies of these publications can be requested free of charge from the European Ombudsman's office:

| 1, Avenue du Président Robert Schuman |
| --- |
| B.P. 403 |
| F-67001 Strasbourg Cedex |
| Tel. (33-3) 88 17 23 13 |
| Fax (33-3) 88 17 90 62 |
| E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu |

1, Avenue du Président Robert Schuman

B.P. 403

F-67001 Strasbourg Cedex

Tel. (33-3) 88 17 23 13

Fax (33-3) 88 17 90 62

E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu

---