alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of East Coast Diversified Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Richard Margulies, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Richard Margulies

Richard MarguliesChief Executive OfficerDated: September 20, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to East Coast Diversified Corporationand will be retained by East Coast Diversified Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Third Division,

July 20, 1942

No. 47398.

#### Protest 31905-K/89307 of Leo G. Stein & Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Stein*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 443, C. D. 511). It was therefore held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1692 as claimed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Dyas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB/A1 of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: April 21, 2005                   By: /s/ James Dyas
                                       James Dyas, Director and
                                       Principle Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Arroyo, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 1004]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered May 3, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that the prosecutor’s remarks during cross examination and summation constituted reversible error *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Tardbania,*72 NY2d 852). In any event, most of *348the prosecutor’s remarks were proper responses to the defendant’s summation and within the rhetorical bounds permitted during closing arguments *(see, People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396). Any improper remarks were harmless and do not constitute reversible error in light of the court’s prompt curative instructions and the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt *(see, People v Galloway, supra; People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). Sullivan, J. P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         I, Andrew C. Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of Genius Products, Inc.
(the "Registrant"), do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code that:

         (1) the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the
Registrant for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), to which this
statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated:  March 31, 2005                 By:  /s/ Andrew C. Schmidt
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Andrew C. Schmidt
                                            Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Worldspan, L.P. (the “Company”)Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,Rakesh Gangwal, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,and Kevin W. Mooney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

 

(1).                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2).                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | May 12, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Rakesh Gangwal                              |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   |   |   | Rakesh Gangwal                                  |
|   |         |   |   |   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |         |   |   |   |                                            |
| Date:  | May 12, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Kevin W. Mooney                             |   |
|   |         |   |   |   | Kevin W. Mooney                                 |
|   |         |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer                         |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

1

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44739-44740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18132]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Nevada Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a planning meeting the 
Nevada Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will be held on 
Thursday, August 21, 2014, at the Clark County Library, 1401 E. 
Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, NV 89119.
    The meeting is scheduled to begin at 1:00 p.m. and adjourn at 
approximately 4:00 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is for the Committee 
to receive a briefing on the militarization of the police and to plan 
project activity.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the Western Regional Office of the 
Commission by September 22, 2014. The address is Western Regional 
Office,

[[Page 44740]]

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 300 N. Los Angeles Street, Suite 2010, 
Los Angeles, CA 90012. Persons wishing to email their comments, or to 
present their comments verbally at the meeting, or who desire 
additional information should contact Angelica Trevino, Civil Rights 
Analyst, Western Regional Office, at (213) 894-3437, (or for hearing 
impaired TDD 913-551-1414), or by email to atrevino@usccr.gov. Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western Regional Office at the above 
email or street address. The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the 
provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated: July 29, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-18132 Filed 7-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 99.5

CONSENT OF APPOINTED ACTUARY

We consent to the use and incorporation by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 40-F of Sun Life Financial Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2016 of the Appointed Actuarys Report to the Shareholders and Directors dated
February 15, 2017 (the Report), relating to the valuation of the policy liabilities and reinsurance recoverables of the Company and its subsidiaries for its Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at December 31, 2016 and
December 31, 2015 and their change in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.



|                                        |  |  |  |                                        
|--------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|/s/ Kevin Morrissey                   |  |  |  | /s/ Larry Madge                      
|                                        |  | 
|Kevin Morrissey                         |  |  |  | Larry Madge                            
|Fellow, Canadian Institute of Actuaries |  |  |  | Fellow, Canadian Institute of Actuaries
|(for the year ended December 31, 2016)  |  |  |  | (for the year ended December 31, 2015) 

Toronto, Canada

February 15, 2017
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00028

- CV

In the Matter of A.J.W. §

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 1

of Wichita County (38979

- LR)

March 26, 2015

Opini on by Justice Sudderth



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is reversed and we vacate the trial court’s Jan uary 26, 2015 “Order to

Authorize Psychoact ive Medication” and “Judgment

– Temporary Mental Health.”

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

________________ Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Before the Second Division,

May 7, 1958

No. 61898.

#### Clarence S. Holmes *v.*United States,

protest 279689-K (Seattle).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that “the merchandise is in fact a diesel internal combustion engine, non-carburetor, non-horizontal type, not weighing over 2,500 pounds and that it is not part of a motorboat,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Gene Hodges, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Websense, Inc;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of Websense as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     Websense's
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for Websense and have:



5.     Websense's
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Websense's auditors and the
audit committee of Websense's board of directors:



Date:
February 28, 2008

| |  | By: |  | /s/GENE HODGESGene Hodges Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
December 10, 1957

No. 61407.

Suit 4927.

#### United States *v.*C. J. Tower & Sons et al.

C. D. 1878. (Appeal dismissed October 10, 1957.)
=E&o-tke. Qj&jttrc£ (Lrhi/Poaf

nJD.

court of om\w&mbKMk- C^f-Jutes,

»* 27 M- —__ AUG 272015

!Acosfa, Clef

4iK^ Qv_5zl Qs/^ ^_ CAjjy9- d£> Q2VUS;Hi^- -25^

^MarJ-Zmh^^- l]^h!s firs//tz^^o Oca^/o^o
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Eastern District of California

Sacramento Division

Adeline S. Greenwell, )

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

Ronald Stremel Greenwell, )

et al, )

)

Defendants. )

)

No. CIV-S-04-2205 MCE GGH

ORDER GRANTING TELEPHONIC

APPEARANCE

The Court having reviewed plaintiff, Adeline S. Greenwell’s Request to Appear

Telephonically and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel may appear telephonically. The Deputy

Courtroom Clerk will contact Plaintiff's attorney, Richard Morris, at 623-583-1040 on the

morning of the hearing.

Date: August 31, 2005

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02205-MCE -GGH Document 31 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:04-cv-02205-MCE -GGH Document 31 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6385

GERALD DAVIS FULLER, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

D. KENNETH HORNING, Warden, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District 

Judge. (1:08-cv-02300-WMN) 

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Gerald Davis Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip M. Pickus, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Gerald Davis Fuller appeals the district court’s 

orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and 

denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Fuller v. Horning, No. 1:08-cv-02300-WMN (D. Md. Feb. 

17, 2009; Mar. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Chris Gibson, Esq., SBN 073353

BOUTIN DENTINO GIBSON 

DI GIUSTO HODELL INC.

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500

Sacramento, CA 95814-4603

(916) 321-4444

(916) 441-7597 Fax

Attorneys for defendants and counterclaimants

Computer Methods International Corp. 

and Hardin Construction Company, LLC

Michael A. Jacobs, Esq., SBN 111664

MORRISON FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

(415) 268-7000

(415) 268-7522 Fax

J. Michael Stusiak, Esq., SBN 142952

MORRISON FOERSTER LLP

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2600

Sacramento, California 95814

(916) 448-3200

(916) 448-3222 Fax

Attorneys for defendant and counterclaimant

Hardin Construction Company, LLC

.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MERIDIAN PROJECT SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HARDIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC,

COMPUTER METHODS INTERNATIONAL CORP., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case NO. : CIV. S-04-2728 FCD DAD

STIPULATION CONTINUING

HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO

DISMISS; ORDER

COMPUTER METHODS INTERNATIONAL CORP.

and HARDIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,

LLC,

 Counterclaimants,

 vs.

MERIDIAN PROJECT SYSTEMS, INC., 

 JAMES OLSEN, JOHN BODROZIC and

MIKE CARRINGTON, 

 Counterdefendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case 2:04-cv-02728-FCD-DAD Document 23 Filed 04/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Counterdefendants MERIDIAN PROJECT SYSTEMS, INC., JAMES OLSEN, JOHN

BODROZIC and MARK CARRINGTON filed a motion to dismiss the second, third and fourth

counterclaimsassertedbyCOMPUTERMETHODSINTERNATIONALCORP.in itssecondamended

answer and counterclaim. They scheduled the hearing on the motion for May 27, 2005, at 10:00 a.m.

The parties, through counsel, agree that the motion may be continued for hearing to June 10,

2005, at 10:00 a.m., in courtroom 2, before the honorable Frank C. Damrell, Jr. Dates for filing and

serving opposition and reply shall be governed by the new hearing date. 

Dated: April 28, 2005. BOUTIN DENTINO GIBSON DI GIUSTO

HODELL INC.

 /s/ Chris Gibson 

Chris Gibson, Attorney for defendants and counterclaimants

ComputerMethodsInternationalCorp.andHardinConstruction

Company, LLC

Dated: April 28, 2005. DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP

 /s/ David Priebe 

David Priebe, Attorney for plaintiff and counterdefendant

Meridian Project Systems, Inc., and counterdefendants John

Bodrozic, Mark Carrington and James Olsen

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 29, 2005. /s/ Frank C. DamrellJr. 

Frank C. Damrell, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02728-FCD-DAD Document 23 Filed 04/29/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 

 

The Board of Directors 

TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-35146 and No. 333-68280), on Form S-8 of TippingPointTechnologies, Inc. of our report dated April 15, 2003, related to the balance sheets of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. as of January 31, 2003 and December 31, 2001, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flowsfor the year ended January 31, 2003, the month ended January 31, 2002 and the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, which report appears in the January 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Austin, Texas 

April 28, 2003
No. 53042.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 88071-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D. 239), the protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4966]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, and 
Wisconsin)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, April 19, 2007, 1 to 4 p.m., 
Friday, April 20, 2007, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., and Saturday, April 21, 2007, 
8 to 11 a.m. Central Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(414) 231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, April 19, 2007, from 1 to 4 p.m.; Friday, April 20, 2007, 
from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.; and Saturday, April 21, 2007, from 8 to 11 a.m. 
Central Time, at 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203. You 
can submit written comments to the Panel by faxing the comments to 
(414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, PO 
Box 3205, Milwaukee, WI 53201-3205, or you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. This meeting is not required to be open to the 
public, but because we are always interested in community input we will 
accept public comments. Please contact Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-
1227 or (414) 231-2360 for more information.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 12, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E7-4966 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P