alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

June 21, 1957

No. 60905.

#### Austin Motor Co., Ltd. (England) *v.*United States,

protests 152964-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ammeters, not in chief value of glass, designed and fitted for use on Austin motorcars, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lucas Electrical Services, Inc.,*and *Frank J. Eberle Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 1776), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIONELL THOLMER,

Petitioner,

v.

C.M. HARRISON, Warden,

Respondent.

CIV S-04-2491 FCD PAN P

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Respondent has filed a request for an enlargement of time to file and serve a response to

the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ordered that:

1. Respondent’s request for an enlargement of time is granted;

2. Respondent shall file and serve a response to the petition within thirty days of the date

of this order.

Dated: May 17, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02491-FCD-EFB Document 14 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Dyas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: October 24, 2006                 By: /s/ James Dyas
                                       James Dyas, Director and
                                       Principle Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick Burns, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 463]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J., at suppression hearing; Juanita Bing Newton, J., at plea and sentence), rendered January 18, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence was properly denied without a hearing since his motion papers failed to address his conduct at the time of the alleged undercover sale and were otherwise conclusory *(People v Mendoza,*82 NY2d 415, 428-429, 430-431). Also conclusory, and therefore not warranting a hearing, was defendant’s claim that a prior conviction was obtained in violation of his right to the effective assistance of counsel *(People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9, 15; *People v Polanco,*192 AD2d 393). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce L. Rubin, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Bruce L. RubinName: Bruce L. RubinDate: May 5, 2016
### U.S. EPA FACT SHEET San Joaquin Valley Fine Particulate Matter

June 29, 2016 Summary

• The San Joaquin Valley is classified as a serious n onattainment area for the 1997 24-hour and annual fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). • Under the Clean Air Act, the San Joaquin Valley was required to attain these standards by December 31, 2015. • Although California Air Resources Board (ARB) and S an Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (the District) have made significa nt progress in reducing emissions of PM 2.5 and its precursor pollutants, ambient PM 2.5 levels in the area continue to exceed the 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS. In summer 2015, ARB and the District asked t he EPA to extend the attainment deadline by three years for the 24-hour standards ( to December 2018) and by five years for the annual standards (to December 2020). • To qualify for such extensions, the Clean Air Act r equires the state to meet stringent pollution control requirements to protect public health. • The EPA is not granting the state's request to exte nd the attainment date. A new planning effort will be required to continue the area’s progress to wards attainment. Background • The San Joaquin Valley is located in the southern h alf of California’s central valley and includes eight counties: San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Ma dera, Fresno, Tulare, Kings, and the San Joaquin Valley portion of Kern. • PM 2.5 can be emitted directly into the atmosphere or for med in the atmosphere as a result of various chemical reactions from emissions of nitrog en oxides, sulfur dioxide, volatile organic compounds, and ammonia. These particles can reach t he deepest regions of the lungs. Exposure to particle pollution is linked to a variety of sig nificant health problems including damage to lung tissue, cancer and premature death. San Joaquin Val ley currently has the highest recorded PM 2.5 concentrations in the nation. • California submitted the 2015 PM 2.5 Plan in June and August 2015 to address the Clean Air Act’s requirements for serious PM 2.5 nonattainment areas and the requirements for exten sion of the attainment date under section 188(e). • In February 2016, the EPA proposed to grant Califor nia's requested attainment date extension based on our preliminary review of the 2015 PM 2.5 Plan and sought public comment. The EPA received adverse comments on several aspects of the plan and its pollution control measures. In light of this additional information, the EPA can n o longer support an action to extend the attainment date for the area. Next steps • When a serious PM 2.5 nonattainment area fails to meet a standard by its deadline, the Clean Air Act requires the state to submit a revised plan tha t provides for expeditious attainment and annual emission reductions of at least 5% until th e area attains the NAAQS. • The State’s request, our proposal, public comments, and other related information can be found at: https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EPA-R09-OAR-20 15-0432

.
No. 59597.

protest 195432-K (New York).

#### Wilbur B. Driver Co. and Import Export Service of N. J. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Laweence, J.

At the first hearing, plaintiffs abandoned their claim that the rolls were dutiable as machine parts. Counsel for the Government stated that “It has been my understanding if the Court should find that this particular merchandise is not dutiable as assessed, that it is properly dutiable at 15 per centum ad valorem as a machine tool under paragraph 372 * * *. As part of a machine tool.” The case was continued in order that a representative of the Government might have an opportunity to inspect certain of the imported rolls. This was done and, at the final hearing, counsel agreed that the steel rolls in question had been ground but had not been polished. The court held that, since paragraph 344 is limited to “Cylindrical steel rolls ground and polished,” with certain qualifications as to value and percentages of certain alloys, it seems obvious that unless such rolls are both ground and polished they are not within the terms of the paragraph. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiffs that the articles are duitable at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 372, as modified, *supra,*for parts of machine tools was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Joseph Pioppi, President of Goldeneye Capital Group, Inc.certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Goldeneye Capital
Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


 Dated: August 1, 2005

 /s/ Joseph Pioppi
 -----------------
 Joseph Pioppi
 President  (Principal Executive Officer)
No. 47916.

#### Protest 645135-G of Nathan Zucker, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the hats in question consist of 8-bu. paper hats the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that a planning meeting with briefing of the Illinois Advisory Committee will convene at 1 p.m. and adjourn at 5 p.m. on Thursday, March 22, 2007, at 55 W. Monroe Street, Fifth Floor Conference Room, Chicago, Illinois 60603. The purpose of the planning meeting with briefing is to conduct an orientation and ethics training for new members, plan future activities, and have a briefing on religious discrimination in prisons. 

Persons desiring additional information, or planning to present a statement to the Committee, should contact Constance M. Davis, Regional Director of the Midwestern Regional Office, 312-353-8311 (TDD 312-353-8362). Hearing impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and the Federal Advisory Committee Act. 

It was not possible to publish this notice 15 days in advance of the meeting date because of internal processing delays. 

Dated at Washington, DC, March 13, 2007. 

Ivy L. Davis, 

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. E7-4838 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

To the Board of Directors
1st Centennial Bancorp
(formerly Centennial First Financial Services)
Redlands, California

We hereby consent to the use in the 10-KSB for 1st Centennial Bancorp (formerly
Centennial First Financial Services) of our report dated January 27, 2003
relating to the financial statements of Centennial First Financial Services as
of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for the three years then ended, and to the
reference to our Firm under the caption "Experts" in the Registration Statement.


Hutchinson & Bloodgood, LLP

Glendale, California
March 17, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Katy Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, C.
Michael Jacobi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ C. Michael Jacobi
---------------------
C. Michael Jacobi
Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Katy Industries, Inc. and will be
retained by Katy Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       93
July 28 , 2015

R obert Walker

Synergy UAS Inc.

1029 Paseo Entrada

Chula Vista, CA 91910

Dear Mr. Walker :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your M ay 15

, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Synergy UAS Inc. into the

public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 1687 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 4264

.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst

, Aircraft and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
No. 58597.

protest 225692-K (New York).

#### Imperial International Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of scissor blades similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58172, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4066]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,982]


Eaton Corporation--Truck Components, Galesburg, MI; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 20, 2007 in response to a 
worker petition filed a company official on behalf of workers at Eaton 
Corporation, Truck Components, Galesburg, Michigan.
    The petitioner has withdrawn the petition. Hence, this 
investigation is terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of February 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-4066 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,313]


Fairystone Fabrics Burlington, NC; Dismissal of Application for 
Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Fairystone Fabrics, Burlington, 
North Carolina. The application did not contain new information 
supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also 
did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the 
determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the 
application was issued.

TA-W-60,313; Fairystone Fabrics, Burlington, North Carolina (March 1, 
2007).

    Signed at Washington, DC this 6th day of March 2007.
Ralph Dibattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-4575 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P