This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final

rules. 

# Proposed Rules Federal Register 

### 43827

Vol. 78, No. 140

Monday, July 22, 2013

**DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE**

**Agricultural Marketing Service**

**7 CFR Part 947**

**[Doc. No. AMS–FV–13–0036; FV13–947–1 PR]** 

**Irish Potatoes Grown in Modoc and Siskiyou Counties, California, and in**  **All Counties in Oregon, Except Malheur County; Termination of**  **Marketing Order No. 947**

**AGENCY :**  Agricultural Marketing Service,

USDA.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This proposed rule invites
comments on the termination of Marketing Order No. 947 (order), which regulates the handling of Irish potatoes grown in Modoc and Siskiyou Counties, California, and in all counties in Oregon, except Malheur County, and the rules and regulations issued thereunder. The order is administered locally by the Oregon-California Potato Committee (Committee), which recommended termination of the marketing order at a meeting held on March 7, 2013. This
recommendation is based on the
Committee’s determination that the order is no longer an effective marketing tool for the Oregon-California potato industry, and that termination would
best serve the current needs of the industry while also eliminating the costs associated with operating the marketing order.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received by September 20, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or

Internet: http://www.regulations.gov.
Comments should reference the
document number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or
can be viewed at: http:// www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this proposal
will be included in the record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities submitting comments will be made public on the Internet at the address provided above.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Kathleen Bright, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 205–2830, Fax: (202)
720–8938 or Email: Kathleen.Bright@ams.usda.gov or Michelle Sharrow, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–9921, Fax: (202)
720–8938 or Email: Michelle.Sharrow@ams.usda.gov.

Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– 2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email: Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This proposal is governed by § 608c(16)(A) of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601– 674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act’’, and § 947.71 of Marketing Agreement No. 114 and Marketing Order No. 947, both as amended (7 CFR part 947), effective under the Act and
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order’’.

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Order

12866.

This proposal to terminate the order
has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have
retroactive effect.

The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.

This proposal invites comments on
the termination of the order and the rules and regulations issued thereunder. The order authorizes regulation of the handling of Oregon-California potatoes. At a meeting held in Salem, Oregon, on March 7, 2013, the Committee
recommended termination of the order.

Section 947.71 of the order provides, in pertinent part, that USDA terminate or suspend any or all provisions of the order when a finding is made that the
order does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. In addition, section 608c(16)(A) of the Act provides that USDA terminate or suspend the operation of any order whenever the order or any provision thereof obstructs
or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. Additionally, USDA is required to notify Congress not later than 60 days before the date the
order would be terminated.

The order has been in effect since1942 and provides the OregonCalifornia potato industry with authority to establish grade, size, maturity, quality, pack and inspection requirements. The order also authorizes marketing research and development projects, the collection of assessments, and reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Based on the Committee’s recommendation, USDA suspended the order’s handling, reporting, and assessment collection regulations effective July 1, 1999 (64 FR 49352). The suspended handling regulations (§ 947.340) consist of minimum quality requirements for potatoes produced within the regulated production area.
When the Committee made the


### 43828 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules

recommendation to suspend the handling regulations, the industry believed that the costs of inspections outweighed the benefits of having the regulatory requirements in effect. At that time, the Committee also suspended the collection of assessments
because there were sufficient funds in the monetary reserve to support the
Committee’s administrative functions. Suspension of §§ 947.247 and 947.180 suspended the collection of assessments and the reporting provision that provided a basis for assessment
collection. The Committee also decided
to evaluate its finances and the marketing conditions annually
thereafter to determine whether to continue with the suspension or take
some other action.

After almost 14 years of evaluating the effects of operating without the handling, reporting, and collection of assessment regulations, the Committee has determined that suspension of the regulations has not adversely impacted the Oregon-California potato industry. Analysis of the marketing conditions over the past 14 years, and analysis ofstatistics showing that the OregonCalifornia potato industry has steadily declined over the past several years, led
the Committee to conclude that the order is no longer an effective marketing
tool. Termination would relieve the industry of the costs and burdens
associated with the order.

Evidence reflecting the industry’s steady decline include statistics showing that the Oregon-California potato industry has fewer producers and handlers today than there were 30 years ago, and that acreage and production have significantly decreased. For example, USDA Marketing Order and Agreement Division records from a
continuance referendum in 1978 indicate that there were approximately 464 producers of potatoes in the order’s production area, while the most recent
information received from the
Committee indicates that there are now only 130 active producers. Furthermore,
Committee records indicate that there were 47 handlers in 1978. Currently, there are only 16 handlers operating.
Committee records also indicate that6,810,195 hundredweight of OregonCalifornia potatoes were shipped in 1978 as compared to the 3,430,548 hundredweight shipped in 2011.

The proposed termination of the order is intended to solicit input and any
additional information available from interested parties regarding whether the
order should be terminated. USDA will evaluate all available information prior to making a final determination on this
matter. Termination of the order would become effective only after a 60-day notification to Congress as required by
law.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.

The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own
behalf.

There are 16 handlers of potatoes subject to regulation under the order and approximately 130 potato producers in the regulated production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by
the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000. (13 CFR 121.201)

During the 2011 marketing year, the Committee reports that 3,430,548 hundredweight of Oregon-California potatoes were shipped into the fresh
market. Based on information from the National Agricultural Statistics Service, the average producer prices for Oregon and California potatoes in 2011 were $8.05 and $14.70 per hundredweight, respectively. Multiplying the 2011 shipment quantity times each of the two state average producer prices, the average gross annual revenue for the 130 Oregon-California potato producers is calculated to range between $212,430 and $387,916.

Typical f.o.b. shipper prices were estimated to be about $2.00 higher than the average grower price per hundredweight. The Committee estimated handler annual receipts from the sale of potatoes by multiplying the estimated shipper prices by individual handler shipment quantities. Based on those computations, the Committee estimated that 15 out of the 16 handlers, or approximately 94 percent, had annual receipts of less than $7,000,000. In view of the foregoing, the majority of Oregon-California potato producers and handlers may be classified as small

entities.

This proposed rule would terminatethe Federal marketing order for OregonCalifornia potatoes and the rules and regulations issued thereunder. The order authorizes regulation of the handling of Oregon-California potatoes.
The Committee has determined that the order is no longer an effective marketing tool for the Oregon-California potato industry. Evidence shows that suspension of the handling regulations has not adversely impacted the shipment of potatoes and that the costs associated with the order outweigh the
benefits. The Committee also believes
that the decline in the number of handlers and producers, and the acreage and volume of Oregon-California potatoes supports termination of the order. As a consequence, in a vote at a meeting on March 7, 2013, the
Committee recommended that USDA
terminate the order.

Section 947.71 of the order provides that USDA terminate or suspend any or all provisions of the order when a finding is made that the order does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. Furthermore, § 608c(16)(A) of the Act provides that USDA shall terminate or suspend the operation of any order whenever the order or provision thereof obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. An additional provision requires that Congress be notified not later than 60 days before the date the
order would be terminated.

The proposed termination of the order is a regulatory relaxation and would
reduce the costs to both handlers and producers (while marketing order requirements are applied to handlers, the costs of such requirements are often passed on to producers). Furthermore, following a period of approximately 14 years of regulatory suspension, the
Committee has determined that
termination of the order would not adversely impact the Oregon-California potato industry.

The Committee considered alternatives to this rule, including continuing with the suspension of the handling regulations, which would require no regulatory action at this time; however, this would require the Committee to continue collecting assessments and enforcing the reporting requirements. The Committee also considered requesting a producer
continuance referendum. The Committee did not support either option, and instead recommended that
the order be terminated.

This proposed rule is intended to solicit input and other available information from interested parties on
whether the order should be terminated.
USDA will evaluate all available


### 43829 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules

information prior to making a final
determination on this matter.

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the information collection requirements being terminated were approved previously by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and assigned OMB No. 0581–0178, Generic Vegetable and Specialty Crops. Termination of the reporting requirements under the marketing order would reduce the reporting and recordkeeping burden on California and Oregon potato handlers by 316.42 hours, and should further reduce industry

expenses.

Since handlers would no longer be required to file forms with the Committee, this proposed rule would not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large entities.

In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.

AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.

The Committee’s meeting was widelypublicized throughout the OregonCalifornia potato industry, and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in
the Committee’s deliberations. Like all Committee meetings, the March 7, 2013, meeting was a public meeting, and all entities, both large and small, were able to express their views on this issue. Additionally, interested persons are
invited to submit information on the regulatory and informational impacts of
this action on small businesses.

A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/ MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny at the previously mentioned address in
the **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**
section.

This proposal invites comments on the termination of Marketing Order No. 947, which regulates the handling of Irish potatoes grown in Modoc and Siskiyou Counties, California, and in all counties in Oregon, except Malheur County. All written comments received in a timely manner will be considered
before a final determination is made on
this matter. Based on the foregoing, and pursuant to § 608c(16)(A) of the Act and § 947.71 of the order, USDA is considering
termination of the order. If USDA decides to terminate the order, trustees would be appointed to conclude and liquidate the affairs of the Committee, and would continue in that capacity until discharged by USDA. In addition, USDA would notify Congress 60 days in advance of termination pursuant to § 608c(16)(A) of the Act.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 947

Marketing agreements, Potatoes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

**PART 947—[REMOVED]**

■ For the reasons set forth in the preamble, under the authority of 7 U.S.C. 601–674, 7 CFR part 947 is proposed to be removed.

Dated: July 16, 2013.

Rex A. Barnes, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.

[FR Doc. 2013–17464 Filed 7–19–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–02–P**

**FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM**

**12 CFR Parts 208 and 225**

**[Regulations H, Q, and Y; Docket No. R– 1459]** 

**RIN 7100 AD–98**

**Risk-Based Capital Guidelines; Market**
**Risk**

**AGENCY :**  Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR).

**SUMMARY :**  The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) proposes to revise its market risk capital rule (market risk rule) to address recent changes to the Country Risk Classifications (CRCs) published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which are
referenced in the Board’s market risk rule; to clarify the treatment of certain traded securitization positions; to make
a technical amendment to the definition of covered position; and to clarify the timing of the required market risk disclosures. These changes would
conform the Board’s current market risk rule to the requirements in the Board’s new capital framework and thereby
allow the current market risk rule to serve as a bridge until the new capital framework becomes fully effective for all banking organizations. **DATES :**  Comments must be submitted on or before September 3, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments should be
directed to:

When submitting comments, please consider submitting your comments by email or fax because paper mail in the Washington, DC area and at the Board may be subject to delay. You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. R–1459 and RIN No. 7100 AD–98, by any of the following methods:

• Agency Web site: http:// www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments at http://www.federalreserve.gov/ generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Email: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov.
Include the Docket and RIN numbers in the subject line of the message.

• Fax: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–

3102.

• Mail: Robert deV. Frierson, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,

DC 20551.

All public comments are available
from the Board’s Web site at http:// www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/ foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as submitted,
unless modified for technical reasons. Accordingly, your comments will not be edited to remove any identifying or
contact information. Public comments may also be viewed electronically or in paper form in Room MP–500 of the Board’s Martin Building (20th and C Street NW., Washington, DC 20551) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Constance Horsley, Manager, (202) 452– 5239, or Tim Geishecker, Senior Supervisory Financial Analyst, (202) 475–6353, Capital and Regulatory Policy, Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation; or Benjamin McDonough, Senior Counsel, (202) 452– 2036, or Mark Buresh, Attorney (202) 452–5270, Legal Division, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th and C Streets NW., Washington, DC 20551. For the hearing impaired only, Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD), (202) 263–

4869.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. Background

On August 30, 2012, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)