alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
 
 Page - 47
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of XrayMedia, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raymond Dabney, President and Chief Executive Officer of XrayMedia, Inc and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 20, 2004   Signature: /s/Raymond C. Dabney
 Raymond C. Dabney
 Chief Executive Officer
    Page - 48
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of XrayMedia, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raymond Dabney, President and Chief Financial Officer of XrayMedia, Inc and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: March 20, 2004   Signature: /s/Raymond C. Dabney
 Raymond C. Dabney
 Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned Surinder Rametra, Treasurer of Goldeneye Capital Group, Inc.
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Goldeneye Capital Group, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldeneye Capital
Group, Inc.


 Dated: April 11, 2005


 /s/ Surinder Rametra
 --------------------
 Surinder Rametra
 Treasurer
 (Principal Financial  Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-15-00583-CV

Style: The Honorable Mark Henry, County Judge of Galveston County

v. The Honorable Lonnie Cox

Date motion filed*: July 22, 2015

Type of motion: Appellant’s Motion to Create a Separate Docket Number for His Additional and Separate 

Notice of Appeal That Challenges the Denial of His Plea to Jurisdiction, and Motion to 

Abate the Briefing Schedule in This Temporary Injunction Appeal until the Jurisdictional

Appeal under the New, Separate Docket Number is Decided

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? Yes

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

Appellant’s (1) Motion to Create a Separate Docket Number for His Additional and Separate Notice of Appeal 

That Challenges the Denial of His Plea to Jurisdiction, and (2) Motion to Abate the Briefing Schedule in This 

Temporary Injunction Appeal until the Jurisdictional Appeal under the New, Separate Docket Number is Decided

are denied. 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 

Date: August 6, 2015
# • FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION COMPLIANCE WITH E.O. 12866 Section 6 ( a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 requires**ag !~** **ncies** to identify for the public , in a complete , clear , and simple manner , thos e chan g es in a regulatory action made at the suggestion or recommendation of the O f fice o f Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) , Office of Management and Budget. 

### Title of Rulemaking: Regulatory Identification Number:

Attachment OIRA did not review the r ulemaking document.

OIRA reviewed the rulem a king docum e nt , but did not suggest or recommend an y changes.
OIRA r e viewed the rulem a king docum e nt , and we hav e documented the changes w e mad e at O IRA ' s sugg e stion or recommendation in an att a chment to this she e t.



### [Attach a lis t of th e cha n ges · we have made t o th e rulemak ing docu m ent a t the s u ggesti o n or r eco mm e nda tio n o.f OI RA . Use a lisr r at h e r th a n a r e dlin elstrikeo ut ve r s i on o.f th e document. Place a copy of thisfo rm in th e docket a n d in t h e p roject.fo l de r.}

### ]

2
No. 38880.

#### Protests 709294-G, etc., of Johnson Bros. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 64907.

#### Schenley Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 913226-G, etc. (Los Angeles, San Francisco, and New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 608), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.,*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5022 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

29 Franklin Street in Petersburg, Virginia, as the ‘‘John Mercer 

Langston Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. KAINE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 29 Franklin Street in Petersburg, Virginia, 

as the ‘‘John Mercer Langston Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN MERCER LANGSTON POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 29 Franklin Street in Peters7 burg, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘John Mercer Langston Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5022 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John Mercer 

5 Langston Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-2973

___________________________

William Brent Maybin

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Corizon Healthcare; Dr. William McKenney

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

Submitted: September 20, 2018

Filed: September 25, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate William Brent Maybin appeals the district court’s1adverse

grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In Maybin’s vague and

1The HonorableCarole E. Jackson, United States DistrictJudge for the Eastern

District of Missouri, now retired. 
conclusory brief, he identifies no specific errors in the district court’s thorough

summary of the evidence the parties presented, or in the court’s application of Eighth

Amendment precedent to that evidence; and, viewing the summary judgment record

in a light most favorable to Maybin, and drawing all reasonable inferences in his

favor, we find no such errors. See Murchison v. Rogers, 779 F.3d 882, 886-87 (8th

Cir. 2015) (de novo review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

-2-
No. 50494.

#### Protests 34514-K, etc., of Foster Canning Co., Inc. (Los Angeles).

*269Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dog food similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 175, C. A. D. 304), which record was incorporated herein, the protests were sustained as claimed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11856-11857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4623]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-42-000]


Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc.; Notice of Filing

March 8, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 1, 2007, Constellation Energy Commodities 
Group, Inc. (Constellation) filed a petition for declaratory order in 
which it requests that the Commission issue an order finding that the 
Settlement in Devon Power LLC, 115 FERC ] 61,340 (2006) does not modify 
or abrogate Constellation's Commission-jurisdictional wholesale power 
purchase agreements with Narragansett Electric Company (Narragansett).
    Constellation states that copies of this filing have been served on 
Narragansett.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25636077666a4b494c4b40765055554a575165434057460b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d69093849599b8babfb8b385a3a6a6b9a4a296b0b3a4b5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

[[Page 11857]]

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 2, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4623 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 1034 **Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  8/24/10 **Regional Airline Association Dave Lot** **terer Connie**  **Arnold** 8/24/10 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  8/24/10 **ATA Joe White**  8/24/10
# C_2007127EN.01000701.xml

| 8.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/7

---

Communication in accordance with Article 12 (5)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 on the information provided by the customs authorities of the Member States concerning the classification of goods in the customs nomenclature

(2007/C 127/03)

Binding Tariff Information ceases to be valid from this day if it becomes incompatible with the interpretation of the customs nomenclature as a result of the following international tariff measures:

Amendments to the Harmonized System Explanatory Notes and the Compendium of Classification Opinions, approved by the Customs Cooperation Council (CCC doc. NC1123) — report of the 38th Session of the HS Committee):

AMENDMENTS TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO BE DONE UNDER ARTICLE 8 PROCEDURE OF THE HS CONVENTION AND CLASSIFICATION OPINIONS EDITED BY THE HS COMMITTEE OF THE WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION

(38th SESSION OF THE HSC IN OCTOBER 2006)

DOC. NC1123

Amendments of the Explanatory Notes of the Nomenclature annexed to the HS Convention

| 26.20 | N/13 |
| --- | --- |
| 27.10 | N/13 |
| Chapter 29 — Annex | N/6 |
| 38.25 | N/13 |
| 49.11 | N/3 |
| 85.08 | N/14 |
| 85.13 | N/2 |
| 85.43 | N/3 |
| Chapter 90 — General | N/14 |
| 90.10 | N/15 |
| 95.04 | N/5 |

26.20

N/13

27.10

N/13

Chapter 29 — Annex

N/6

38.25

N/13

49.11

N/3

85.08

N/14

85.13

N/2

85.43

N/3

Chapter 90 — General

N/14

90.10

N/15

95.04

N/5

Classification Opinions approved by the HS Committee

| 4418.72/4 | N/7 |
| --- | --- |
| 8424.81/1 | N/8 |
| 8462.21/2 | N/9 |
| 8473.40/1 | N/16 |
| 8513.10/1 | N/10 |
| 8517.11/1 | N/11 |
| 8517.62/12 | N/12 |
| 8528.12/4 | N/16 |

4418.72/4

N/7

8424.81/1

N/8

8462.21/2

N/9

8473.40/1

N/16

8513.10/1

N/10

8517.11/1

N/11

8517.62/12

N/12

8528.12/4

N/16

Information regarding the contents of these measures can be obtained from the Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union of the European Commission (rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussels) or can be downloaded from the internet site of this Directorate-General:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/tariff_aspects/harmonised_system/index_en.htm

---
S. 467 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty three 

An Act 

To modify the age requirement for the Student Incentive Payment Program of 

the State maritime academies. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Changing Age-Determined Eligibility To Student Incentive Payments Act’’ or the ‘‘CADETS Act’’. 

SEC. 2. AGE REQUIREMENT FOR THE STUDENT INCENTIVE PAYMENT 

PROGRAM OF THE STATE MARITIME ACADEMIES. 

Section 51509 of title 46, United States Code, is amended 

by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(i) AGE REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary may make an agreement under this section only with a qualified student who will 

meet the age requirement for enlistment or commission in the 

Navy Reserve at the time of graduation from the academy.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-11400

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK EUGENE NASH,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-29-ALL-C 

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Patrick Eugene Nash appeals following his guilty plea to

possession with intent to distribute less than five grams of

cocaine base. Nash argues that his sentence violates United

States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), and Blakely v.

Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). The instant appeal is

barred, however, by the plain language of Nash’s knowing and

voluntary appeal waiver in the plea agreement. See United States

v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 545-46 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v.

McKinney, 406 F.3d 744, 746-47 (5th Cir. 2005).
No. 04-11400

-2-

APPEAL DISMISSED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                             ANC RENTAL CORPORATION
                            200 South Andrews Avenue
                         Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

May 14, 2002

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the Commission's recently promulgated Temporary Note 3T to Article 3
of Regulation S-X regarding requirements for Arthur Andersen LLP audit clients
as set forth in Release No. 33-8070, effective March 18, 2002, this letter is to
advise the Commission that we have, as of the date hereof, received written
representations from Arthur Andersen LLP that its audit of the financial
statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended
December 31, 2001 (to which this letter is filed as Exhibit 99.1) was subject to
Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
compliance with professional standards, and that there was appropriate
continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of
national office consultation to conduct the relevant portions of the audit, and
availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct
the relevant portions of the audit.

Sincerely,

ANC Rental Corporation

By:  /s/ Wayne Moor
     Chief Financial Officer
No. 38874.

#### Protests 768611-G, etc., of Academic Supply Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


 AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT 




This AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made effective as of September 3, 2016 by and between CALIX, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Company") and KEVIN PETERS, an individual ("Consultant") to amend the Consulting Agreement (and the Exhibit A thereto) dated August 26, 2016 (the "Agreement") between the Parties. Except as otherwise stated, capitalized terms shall have the meaning ascribed in the Agreement. 


The Parties agree as follows: 
		
	1.
	Extension Term. The Agreement term shall be extended by an additional four (4) weeks commencing September 3, 2016 and ending September 30, 2016 (the "Extension Term") pursuant to Section 4 of the Agreement.


		
	2.
	Expenses to be reimbursed. Reasonable and necessary expenses related to travel and other direct expenses incurred in connection with rendering the Work to be Performed, not to exceed $12,000 for the Extension Term unless approved in advance by the Company in writing.


		
	3.
	Maximum amount Company is required to pay. The maximum amount the Company is required to pay under the Agreement as stated in Exhibit A of the Agreement shall be amended in its entirety to state:


"Not in any event to exceed $110,000 (inclusive of fees and expenses)."
		
	4.
	Except as set forth in this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment with effect as of the date first set forth above. 


*****


	
		
	CALIX, INC.
	KEVIN PETERS

	 
	 

	By:  /s/ Suzanne Tom
	By:  /s/ Kevin Peters

	Name:  Suzanne Tom
	Name:  Kevin Peters

	Title:  VP, General Counsel
	 

	Date: September 22, 2016
	Date: September 28, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13108-13109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4981]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

[[Page 13109]]

    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than April 3, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. PSB Holding Corp., Preston, Maryland; to engage de novo through 
its subsidiary, Community Bank Mortgage Corporation, Easton, Maryland, 
in the origination and sale of residential mortgage loans to the 
secondary market, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 14, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc.E7-4981 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-40949

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MIGUEL HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 95-CR-105-1

- - - - - - - - - -

August 20, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Miguel Hernandez-Martinez appeals his conviction for

possession with intent to distribute and importation of more than

five kilograms of cocaine, arguing there was insufficient

evidence to convict him. We have reviewed the record and

determined that when the evidence is viewed in the light most
No. 95-40949

- 2 -

favorable to the jury’s verdict, a rational trier of fact could

have found each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. 

See United States v. Resio-Trejo, 45 F.3d 907, 911 (5th Cir.

1995). 

AFFIRMED.