alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 54692.

#### Olavarria & Company *v.*United States,

protests 25834-K, etc. (Tampa).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the-court dismissed the protests.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 4, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00638

- CV

CON

- CORP CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C.

,

Appellant

v.

J.D. Collision Express, L.L.C.

,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI07146 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due October 31, 2016, but it was not filed. The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late record stating the record was not filed because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee to prepare the record and appellant is not entitled to the record without paying the fee.

We order appellant Con

- Corp Construction, LLC to provide written proof to this court by November 14, 2016 that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the clerk have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to the clerk’s record without prepayment of the c lerk’s fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 and 35.3(a). If appellant fails to file such proof within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

I N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of November, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 55976.

protests 159856-K, etc. (Seattle).

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Curtis J. Clawson, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HLI OperatingCompany, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
          b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
          a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.   /s/ CURTIS J. CLAWSON Curtis J. Clawson*President and Chief Executive Officer*
Date: December 15, 2004
47
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1425. KEMIEL OBRYAN DOWNER v. THE STATE.

In November 2018, Kemiel Obryan Downer, while represented bycounsel, was

convicted of two counts of aggravated assault. Downer’s trial counsel filed a timely

motion for new trial. Thereafter, Downer obtained new counsel, who filed an

amended motion for new trial. The trial court entered a written order denying the

motion for new trial on January 10, 2022. Downer filed a pro se notice of appeal on

February 7, 2022. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

“A criminal defendant in Georgia does not have the right to represent himself

and also be represented by an attorney, and pro se filings by represented parties are

therefore unauthorized and without effect.” Tolbert v. Toole, 296 Ga. 357, 363 (3)

(767 SE2d 24) (2014) (punctuation omitted). Here, the record showsthat Downer was

represented by counsel at the time the trial court entered its order denying his motion

for new trial, and nothing in the record indicates that counsel either withdrew or was

relieved from representing Downer. See White v. State, 302 Ga. 315, 319 (2) (806

SE2d 489) (2017) (rejecting defendant’s argument that representation terminates

upon entry of judgment and recognizing that a defense counsel’s duties toward a

client extend for at least the 30 days after the entry of judgment when a notice of

appeal may be filed). Under these circumstances, Downer’s pro se notice of appeal

is a legal nullity and must be dismissed. See Soberanis v. State, 345 Ga. App. 403,

405 (812 SE2d 800) (2018).

August 03, 2022
Accordingly, the State’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this appeal is

hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,

Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/03/2022
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly Report of United EcoEnergy Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William K. Mackey, Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ William K. Mackey
---------------------------
William K. Mackey
Chief Executive Officer
March 12, 2007
Case No. 7,926.

#### KOONES v. THOMEE.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 290.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1806.

Intoxicating Liquors — Sale—Recovert—Con-struction of Statutes — Boarders.

The act of assembly of Virginia of December 26. 1792 (section 18), which prevents a tavern-keeper from recovering more than $5, for liquors sold in one year to one person, to be drank in the place where the tavern is kept, applies as well to boarders, as to others residing within twenty miles of the tavern.

In an action of assumpsit, for boarding, lodging, and liquors, brought by the plaintiff, who was a tavern-keeper.

Mr. Swann, for defendant,

moved the court to instruct the jury, that the plaintiff cannot .recover more than $5 a year for liquors sold to be drank in the house. The words of the act of assembly of December 26, 1792 (section 13, p. 204), are, “No keeper of a tavern shall recover more than $5 for liquors sold within the space of a year, to one person residing less than twenty miles from such a tavern, and drank or sold to be drank in the place where it is kept”

E. J. Lee contended that the law did not apply to boarders.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

instructed the jury, that if they should be satisfied, by the evidence, that the plaintiff was a tavern-keeper, and that the- defendant resided in the plaintiff’s tavern, at the time the liquors were furnished to be drank in the house, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover more than $5 a year for liquors sold; but if the jury should be satisfied that the plaintiff has a family or domicil more than twenty miles from the place where the liquor was sold, this law did not apply.

Verdict for the full claim; and THE COURT, after argument, refused to grant a new trial, which the plaintiff prayed for on the ground that the verdict was against evidence and law.
```
**EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of JED Oil Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certifies that:

         (i)      the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
                  the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                  15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                  as amended; and

         (ii)     information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: May 17, 2004                           /s/ Reginald J. Greenslade
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                   Reginald J. Greenslade
                                          	   Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to JED Oil Inc.  and will be retained by
JED Oil Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                    **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of JED Oil Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certifies that:

         (i)      the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
                  the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                  15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                  as amended; and

         (ii)     information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: May 17, 2004                               /s/ Bruce A. Stewart
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                        Bruce A. Stewart
                                              		Chief Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to JED Oil Inc. and will be retained by
JED Oil Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Performance report**
 
2004 | 2006| 2008: ReportSupplement
 
SuDoc Number:EP 10.102: ST 8
Item Number:0431-X-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000896312
 
January 23, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4852 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4852

To prohibit oil and gas leasing on the Outer Continental Shelf off the 
                         coast of New England.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2024

 Mr. Whitehouse (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Collins, Ms. Hassan, 
   Mr. King, Mr. Markey, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Reed, Mrs. Shaheen, and Ms. 
    Warren) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit oil and gas leasing on the Outer Continental Shelf off the 
                         coast of New England.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New England Coastal Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL 
              SHELF OFF THE COAST OF NEW ENGLAND.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section or any other law, the Secretary may not issue a lease for the 
exploration for, or development or production of, oil or natural gas in 
any area of the outer Continental Shelf off the coast of the State of 
Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, or Connecticut.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

Inconnection with the Form 10-Q of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. forthe quarter ended March 31, 2008, I, William R. Talley, Jr.,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Frederick CountyBancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledgeand belief, that:

 

(1) such Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the informationcontained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008,fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ William R. Talley, Jr.                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William R. Talley, Jr.                           |
| Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 40716

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Jermon Rodriguez Clark,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 2:94

- CR -1-3

**______________________________** Before **Dennis, Southwick,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Jermon Rodriguez Clark , federal prisoner # 04709

- 078, appeals the denial of h is motion for compassionate release, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) , and the denial of his motion for reconsideration

. We review the denial of a motion for compassionate release and the denial of a motion for reconsideration for abuse of discretion. United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020) ; United States v. Haj , 850 F.

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 8, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40716 Document: 62-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/08/2024No. 23

- 40716
App’x 904, 905 (5th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (unpublished)

. The district court’s order s denying Clark ’s compassionate release motion and motion for reconsideration demonstrate that the court adequately considered h is arguments about the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and concluded that they did not weigh in favor of relief. See Chambliss , 948 F.3d at 693 (explaining that a district court must provide “specific factual reasons” for its decision on a motion for compassionate release ). Clark ’s arguments regarding the § 3553(a) factors amount to a disagreement with the court’s balancing of th ose factors; h is disagreement does not warrant rever sal. See id. at 694 (holding that disagreement with the district court’s balancing of the § 3553(a) factors “is not a sufficient ground for reversal” (citing United States v. Malone , 828 F.3d 331, 342 (5th Cir. 2016)) )

. We need not consider Clark ’s contention that the district court erred in finding that he failed to show extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting relief because the district court did not abuse its discretion in its alternative ruling that relief was un warranted under the applicable § 3553(a) factors. 1 See, e.g. , United States v. Jackson , 27 F.4th 1088, 1093 n.8 (5th Cir. 2022) (recognizing that “we have regularly affirmed the denial of a compassionate

- release motion . . . where the district court’s weighing of the Section 3553(a) factors can independently support its judgment”).
The district court’s orders are **AFFIRMED**

.

**_____________________**
1 The district court is free to reweigh those factors in connection with Clark’s pending 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. See Motion to Reduce Sentence, United States v. Clark , No. 2:94

- CR

- 1(0 3 ) (E.D. Tex. Ju ly 8 , 2 024 ) , ECF No. 222. Case: 23-40716 Document: 62-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/08/2024
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Cano Petroleum, Inc. (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Dated: May 11, 2009 | /s/ S. Jeffrey Johnson        |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                     | S. Jeffrey Johnson            |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

VICTOR S. HALTOM

Attorney at Law

State Bar No. 155157

428 J Street, Suite 350

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 444-8663

Facsimile: (916) 444-1546

e-mail: vshjah@aol.com

Attorney for Claimant

DAVID McELVAIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE UNITED STATES OF ) CIV-S-04-2470 LKK/KJM

AMERICA, )

) ORDER

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT )

11550 MUSHROOM TRAIL, )

GRASS VALLEY, NEVADA )

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, )

BEARING APN: 53-130-31 )

INCLUDING ALL )

APPURTENANCES AND )

IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, )

)

)

Defendant. )

______________________________ )

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is

hereby ORDERED that the discovery cut-off date in this matter is extended until

November 15, 2005.

DATED: August 30, 2005. /s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

Lawrence K. Karlton

Senior Judge

U.S. District Court

Case 2:04-cv-02470-LKK -KJM Document 25 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Case 2:04-cv-02470-LKK -KJM Document 25 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 2