alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wired Associates Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacqueline Winwood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
16th day of March, 2011.


/s/ Jacqueline Winwood
----------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
No. 45020.

#### Protest 916539-G of Pacific Fruit & Produce Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protest was dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY McIVER, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-01-1967 KJM

vs.

CALIFORNIA EXPOSITION & FAIR, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ISC, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-04-1790 KJM

vs.

CALIFORNIA EXPOSITION & FAIR, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

 Plaintiffs have filed an ex parte application to extend the time for filing a reply

with respect to plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and opposition to defendant’s countermotions. Upon review of the file, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiffs’ reply and opposition to the counter-motions shall be filed no later

than May 26, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM Document 36 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Defendant’s reply on the counter-motions shall be filed no later than June 2,

2006. 

3. Under Local Rule 78-230(h), the court has determined that the matter will be

submitted on the papers without oral argument. The hearing date of May 31, 2006 accordingly is

vacated. 

DATED: May 23, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006 mciver-isc.sub

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM Document 36 Filed 05/23/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I,  Russell Ingledew, as Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IPEX, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is
being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's  disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c)  disclosed  in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions);

      (a) all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

August 22, 2005

/s/ Russell Ingledew
-------------------------
 Russell Ingledew
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit4.16

|  | Leveraged Finance 3rd Floor 54 LombardStreet London EC3P3AH |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------|

ebookers plc25 FarringdonStreetLondonEC4A 4AB

|  | Tel 0207699 5000 Fax 020 7699 2770/3275    www.barclays.com    **Barclays** |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

DearSirs  21 January 2003

**FacilitiesAgreement made on or about the date hereof between (1) ebookers plc and(2) Barclays Bank plc ("The FacilitiesAgreement")**

We refer to the FacilitiesAgreement and terms defined therein shall have the same meaning whenused in this letter unless the contrary is otherwise indicated.

This letter is supplemental to the Facilities Agreement andis a Finance Document.

Further to our recent discussions,we write to confirm our agreement with you that you will use your bestendeavours to reduce the amount of the Guarantee Facility C to£7,500,000 within three months of the Completion Date. We shouldbe grateful if you would confirm this agreement by signing, dating andreturning to us this letter.

Yours faithfully

For and on behalf of Barclays Bank Plc

|              |             |
|--------------|-------------|
| Signed  | /s/ JohnBox |

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

We, ebookersplc hereby irrevocably and unconditionally confirm our agreement asdescribed above.

For and on behalf of ebookers plc

|              |                        |
|--------------|------------------------|
| Signed  | /s/ Nigel AddisonSmith |

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|             |                |
|-------------|----------------|
| Dated  | 21 January2003 |

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

----
November 30, 1960

No. 64938.

#### J. M. Sutton Sons & Co. and H. W. Ebert Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/4117 and 59/22935.

Abstract 64819. Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
November 7, 1960

No. 64870.

Suit 4987.

#### Barclay & Company, Inc. *v.*United States.

C.D. 2031 affirmed July 20, 1960. C.A.D. 745.
#### The National Trucking Company, Incorporated, v. Allen Gill. The National Trucking Company, Incorporated, v. Bud Gill.

182 So. 220.

Opinion Filed June 16, 1938.

*Milam, Mcllvaine & Milam,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Mack H. Padgett, P. B. Harrell*and *C. E. Rutledge,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

The writ of error in each of these cases was taken to a final order made in a statutory proceeding denying a petition to stay an execution issued upon a judgment in an action for personal injury obtained in the ab*845sence and without the knowledge of the trial or negligence of counsel for the defendant and without a compliance with the essential requirements of Rule 56 of the Circuit Court Rules in Common Law Actions. The defendant was organically entitled to notice and an opportunity to be present and to defend when the trial was had, and Rule 56 is designed to conserve such organic right. The bill of exceptions and the record proper show that counsel for the defendant was not negligent under the facts of the case and was therefore entitled to the notice contemplated by Rule 56 which is binding on the court and counsel.

Reversed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Ci-iapman, J. J., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADDED BY****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven C. Ackmann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 
| Date:  March 6, 2009 | By:    | /s/ STEVEN C. ACKMANN                  |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Steven C. Ackmann,                     |
|                                |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

93

----
Opinion issued November 24, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00906-CV

———————————

RITA LEMONS, Appellant

V.

ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS SCHOOL BOARD, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2000-34109D

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Rita Lemons, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. More than 

ten days have elapsed since the filing of the motion, and no party has objected to 

dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a). No opinion has issued in this appeal. 
2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wired Associates Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
Delbeck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
13th day of June, 2007.


/s/ Scott Delbeck
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Monica M. Weed certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Information Resources, Inc.Litigation Contingent Payment Rights Trust;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statementsof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the“Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)              presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| /s/ MONICA M. WEED |   |
|--------------------|--------|
| Monica M. Weed     |
| Litigation Trustee |
| August 12, 2004    |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY A. CHATMAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2655 MCE GGH P

vs.

SOLANO COUNTY JAIL,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On August 17, 2005, defendant Childers filed a motion to dismiss. On September

16, 2005, defendants Hambright and Mercado filed motions to dismiss. On September 16, 2005,

defendant Childers apparently inadvertently filed a motion to dismiss duplicative of the motion

filed August 17, 2005. On September 21, 2005, defendant Nixon filed a motion to dismiss.

On August 31, 2005, plaintiff filed a summary judgment motion. On September

23, 2005, plaintiff filed an opposition to defendant Childers’ motion to dismiss. On September

23, 2005, plaintiff filed a memorandum in support of his summary judgment motion.

After reviewing plaintiff’s pleadings, he does not appear to have filed oppositions

to the motions to dismiss filed by defendants Hambright, Mercado and Nixon. Accordingly,

plaintiff is ordered to show cause why the motions to dismiss filed on behalf of these defendants

should not be granted. If plaintiff intended any of his pleadings to be oppositions to these

Case 2:04-cv-02655-MCE -GGH Document 40 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

motions, he should so state in his response to the show cause order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Childers’ motion to dismiss filed August 17, 2005, is vacated

because it is duplicative of the motion to dismiss filed September 16, 2005;

2. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause within twenty days of the date of this order

for his failure to oppose the motions to dismiss filed by defendants Hambright, Mercado and

Nixon; within that time, plaintiff shall file oppositions to these motions; 

3. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the

motions to dismiss filed by defendants Hambright, Mercado and Nixon be granted.

DATED: 1/12/06 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:kj

chat2655.osc

Case 2:04-cv-02655-MCE -GGH Document 40 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2
# C_2007194EN.01002001.xml

| 22.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/20

---

Publication, pursuant to Article 12(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, concerning a cancellation application

(2007/C 194/14)

This publication confers the right to object the cancellation application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 (1). Statements of objections must reach the Commission within six months from the date of this publication.

1

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006

Cancellation request according to Article 12(2)

‘KISSLEGGER MINERALQUELLE’

EC No: DE/PDO/017/0897/23.7.2003

ImagePGI ImagePDO

1.   Registered name proposed for cancellation:

‘Kißlegger Mineralquelle’

2.   Member State or Third Country:

Germany

3.   Type of product:

Class 2.2: Natural mineral waters and spring waters

4.   Person or body making request for cancellation:

| Name: | Mineralbrunnen Überkingen Teinach AG |
| --- | --- |
| Address: | D-73337 Bad Überkingen |

Name:

Mineralbrunnen Überkingen Teinach AG

Address:

D-73337 Bad Überkingen

Nature of legitimate interest in making the request:

The applicant is the only producer of the protected name.

5.   Reasons for Cancellation:

The applicant has decided that it no longer wants to use the name as a protected designation of origin and therefore no longer wants to pay the control costs.

---

(1)  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

---
No. 52656.

protests 141606-K, etc. (New York).

#### Sam Forwand Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL AND STRATEGIC OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hotels.com (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mel
Robinson, Chief Financial and Strategic Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                         /s/ Mel Robinson


                                         Mel Robinson
                                         Chief Financial and Strategic Officer
                                         March 27, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hotels.com and will be retained by Hotels.com and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER LEE JENKINS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2520 LKK JFM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action seeking

relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

Judgment was entered on June 22, 2006. On July 10, 2006, plaintiff filed a

motion for reconsideration, dated June 28, 2006. Plaintiff alleged he had filed objections to the

July 28, 2005 findings and recommendations, but apparently the court had not received them. By

order filed July 18, 2006, plaintiff was directed to file a copy of the objections with the court. On

August 7, 2006, the court received plaintiff’s objections which were dated June 7, 2006.

Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration will be granted. The

judgment will be vacated and the court will consider plaintiff’s objections.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02520-LKK -JFM Document 49 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On July 28, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections

to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s July 10, 2006 motion for reconsideration is granted;

2. The June 22, 2006 judgment is vacated;

3. Upon reconsideration, the findings and recommendations filed July 28, 2005,

are adopted in full; and

4. This action is dismissed for failure to a claim upon which relief may be

granted. 

DATED: September 12, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-02520-LKK -JFM Document 49 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 44072.

#### Protests 731759-G, etc., of Leghorn Trading Co. et al. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.