alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


  


SPECIMEN COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE


 


	NUMBER	SHARES _________C


 


MOTA GROUP, INC.


 


INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF DELAWARE


 


COMMON STOCK


 


SEE REVERSE FOR

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


 


	THIS CERTIFIES THAT	CUSIP


 


IS THE OWNER OF


 


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF
THE PAR VALUE OF

$.0001 EACH OF THE COMMON STOCK OF


 


MOTA GROUP, INC.


 


transferable on the books of the Corporation
in person or by duly authorized

attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This

certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer

Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the seal of

the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of

its duly authorized officers.


 


Dated:


 


COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:


Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company


Transfer Agent and Registrar


 


	 	 	 
	Authorized Signature	 	Chief Executive Officer


 


 


MOTA GROUP, INC..

CORPORATE

SEAL 2016

DELAWARE


 




    


     


    

 


The following abbreviations, when used in
the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable
laws or regulations:


 


TEN COM - as tenants in common 


TEN ENT - as tenants by the
entireties 


JT TEN - as joint tenants with
right of survivorship and not as tenants in common


 


	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -	
	 Custodian	
	

	 	(Cust)	 	(Minor)	 
	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
	 	Act	
	
	

	 	 	(State)	 


 


Additional Abbreviations may also be used
though not in the above list.


 


For value received, ___________________________
hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


 


	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)
	 
	  
	

	
 	shares
	of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
	 	 
	
	Attorney
	to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation will full power of substitution in the premises.
	 	 	 	 


 


	Dated	
	 
	 	 
	 	 	NOTICE:	The signature to this assignment must correspond with
the name as written upon the face of the certificate in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever.
	 	 	 	 
	Signature(s) Guaranteed:
	 
	 
	



 


TRANSFER FEE WILL APPLY


 




    2
No. 44995.

#### Protests 975918-G, etc., of Dritz Traum Co. et al. (New York).

*474Opinion by

Olivee, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers similar to those the subject of Abstract 44140. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218(f) was therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES NEUMANN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2518 FCD GGH P

vs.

GOV. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 13, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-02518-FCD-GGH Document 12 Filed 08/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 13, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED:August 19, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02518-FCD-GGH Document 12 Filed 08/19/05 Page 2 of 2
# C_2007187EN.01000101.xml

| 10.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 187/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 7.2.2007 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid No | N 54/06 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aiuti finalizzati a promuovere e ad accelerare l'eliminazione delle navi cisterna a scafo singolo e ad ammodernare la flotta |
| Legal basis | Articoli 2 e 3 della legge 9 gennaio 2006, n. 13 — Disposizioni per la sicurezza della navigazione, per favorire l'uso di navi a doppio scafo e per l'ammodernamento della flotta |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | To enhance maritime safety via the accelerated withdrawal of single-hull vessels in Italy |
| Form of aid | — |
| Budget | EUR 12 million per annum |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration | 3 years |
| Economic sectors | Maritime transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministero dei Trasporti |
| Other information | Decision not to raise any objections to the measure as it is compatible with Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty and the Community Guidelines on State aid in the maritime transport sector |

Date of adoption of the decision

7.2.2007

Aid No

N 54/06

Member State

Italy

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aiuti finalizzati a promuovere e ad accelerare l'eliminazione delle navi cisterna a scafo singolo e ad ammodernare la flotta

Legal basis

Articoli 2 e 3 della legge 9 gennaio 2006, n. 13 — Disposizioni per la sicurezza della navigazione, per favorire l'uso di navi a doppio scafo e per l'ammodernamento della flotta

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

To enhance maritime safety via the accelerated withdrawal of single-hull vessels in Italy

Form of aid

—

Budget

EUR 12 million per annum

Intensity

—

Duration

3 years

Economic sectors

Maritime transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministero dei Trasporti

Other information

Decision not to raise any objections to the measure as it is compatible with Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty and the Community Guidelines on State aid in the maritime transport sector

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001097900
<NAME> BASIC ENERGY, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,076
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       644,469
<OTHER-SE>                                    (695,545)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (51,076)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (51,076)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (51,076)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.008)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.008)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofTippingPoint Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Rapisand, Director ofFinance and Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thisCertificate, effective as of April 28, 2003. 

 

/s/ MICHAEL J. RAPISAND 

Michael J. Rapisand, 

Director of Finance and Corporate Controller 

 

Note 1: The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document. 

 

Note 2: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. and willbe retained by TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 41820.

#### Protest 203280-G of I. Magnin & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) the Normandy laces in question were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
# C_2007176EN.01001401.xml

| 28.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 176/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 176/14

---

Commission communication concerning the Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on trade in wine

(2007/C 176/09)

By letter dated 7 February 2007, the US have notified the Community that in accordance with Article 6(3) of the Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on trade in wine (1) the change of legal status concerning ‘semi-generics’ referred to in the said Article has come into effect. The relevant US legislation is the ‘Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 — Section 422’ which was signed by the US President and enacted as law on 20 December 2006.

1

In accordance with Article 17(2) of the Agreement, Article 4 of the Agreement concerning wine making practises and specifications and Article 9 concerning the certification of wine and other marketing conditions are therefore applicable in the Community as of 1 April 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 87, 24.3.2006, p. 2.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2019 (the “Report”) of Oxford Square Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Jonathan H. CohenName: Jonathan H. CohenDate:October30, 2019
1 

### Hutson, Nick

From: Hutson, Nick Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 6:36 PM To: 'Szabo, Aaron'; Frey, Nathan J. Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Fruh, Steve Attachments: 111(b) TSD_IRP Review_DRAFT_073015.docx; 111(b) TSD _ Geographic Availability_DRAFT_073015.docx; 111(b) TSD_Achievab ility New Steam_DRAFT_ 073015.docx

Aaron and Nathan -

Attached are 3 Technical Support Documents (TSDs) t hat provide supporting information for the 111(b) p reamble/rule.

1. A review of Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs) 2. Geographic Availability of Geologic Storage, etc. 3. Achievability of the Standard for New Steam Units

If you have questions, let me know.

Nick 

# Nick Hutson, PhD

Energy Strategies Group Office of Air & Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 tel: +1 919 541 2968 email: hutson.nick@epa.gov
No. 48554.

#### Protest 91822-K of John A. Conkey & Co. (Boston).

*218Opinion by

Cline, J.

The question is whether the merchandise was “imported and entered” on March 31, 1941, as claimed by the plaintiff, or on April 1, 1941. The party who filed the entry testified in behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant called the chief entry clerk at the port of entry, but there was nothing presented to show that the estimated duty was paid before April 1. The stamp on the face of the entry indicates it was paid on that day. From the record presented it was held that the entry was not completed on March 31. The protest was therefore overruled. Abstract 45512 cited.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PROJEKT PROPERTY RESTORATION, INC., a/a/o WALTER QUINTERO
, Appellant,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 501

[ February 16, 2022 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Kathleen McCarthy , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. COCE18

- 15307 and CACE20

- 17323

.

Samuel Alexander of Alexander Appellate Law P.A., DeLand, for appellant.

Kristi Bergemann Rothell of Methe & Rothell, P.A ., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

We affirm the summary judgment in appellee insurer’s favor on appellant’s claim for insurance benefits under a homeowner’s policy.

Appellant provided remediation services for a water leak in a shower in insured’s premises and based upon an assignment of benefits

, filed suit when appellee insurer failed to pay appellant’s invoice for its water
remediation services

. Insurer defended on the grounds of a policy exclusion for property loss caused by constant or repeated seepage or leakage of water over a period of weeks, months

, or years.

Insurer moved for summary judgment using the deposition of its adjuster and an expert, bot h of whom testified that the leak had existed for a considerable period of time and at least in excess of two weeks.

A ppellant filed an expert affidavit which essentially stated that insurer’s expert’s opinions were not valid because additional testing wo uld be necessary to determine the cause of the leak. However, appellant’s expert2 did not opine regarding the length of time the leaking had continued and only opined that the facts did not support a finding that the damage took a period of months to accru e . Because appellant did not provide any opposition to the length of time that the leaking water continued for at

least weeks

, no genuine issue of material fact existed , and insurer was entitled to judgment.

O n appeal, appellant argues that under Hicks v. American Integrity Insurance Co. of Fl orida , 241 So. 3d 925 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), involving a similar policy exclusion, the policy should cover losses incurred within the first two weeks of a leak, even if dama ges caused by a continuous leak may not be covered

. However, a ppellant’s complaint here did not allege that its services were for damages incurred within the first two weeks of the leak, as did the insured in Hicks

, and no argument based on Hicks was made before the trial court on this issue. Thus, this issue is not preserved on appeal. See Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass ’n v. Robbins , 914 So. 2d 925

, 928 (Fla. 2005).

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, G ROSS and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ex rel. RICHARD C. HASELTINE,

NO. CIV. S-04-2575 LKK/DAD

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

The United States has declined to intervene in the abovecaptioned case. Good cause appearing, the Status Conference

currently set for April 24, 2006 is CONTINUED to June 19, 2006 at

3:30 p.m. Relator is directed to serve the amended complaint, as

well as a copy of this order, on defendants within twenty (20)

days. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 24, 2006

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02575-LKK -DAD Document 22 Filed 04/24/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 49702.

#### Protests 69503-K, etc., of H. P. Lambert Co., Inc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the dried lotus nuts (Hoi- Pak Lin); Yuen Yuk; and dried lily bulbs (Oi Hop Gone); dried lily flower (Kum Choi), are the same in all material respects as the merchandise passed upon in *United States*v. *Yick Shew Tong Co.*(25 C. C. P. A. 255, T. D. 49392) and *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was sustained as to these items. It was further stipulated that Wy Shan Kok and Wy Shan Pin are the same as the merchandise passed upon in *United States*v. *Yick Shew Tong Co., supra,*and *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States, supra.*The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained as to these items.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-312 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CIVIL AVIATION 

Transport Services 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CANADA 

Signed at Washington March 12, 2007 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 CANADA 

Civil Aviation: Transport Services 

 Agreement signed at Washington 

 March 12, 2007; 

 Entered into force March 12, 2007. 

 With annexes. 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
No. 63145.

#### Liebermann Waelchli & Co., New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/15091 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson., J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
#### Vincent Warsaw, Appellant, v Rexnord, Inc., Also Known as Rex Chainbelt, Inc., Also Known as Chain Belt Company, Respondent.

[634 NYS2d 14]

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiff in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff was seriously injured when struck by a 1,500 pound bushing that slipped out of a cone crusher that was under repair. He appeals from that portion of an order granting the cross motion of Rexnord, Inc. (defendant) for summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action of the complaint. As limited by plaintiff’s brief and oral argument, the only issue raised on appeal is whether summary judgment was properly granted on that portion of the second cause of action alleging strict products liability based upon a failure to warn. We conclude that factual issues exist whether defendant, the manufacturer of the cone crusher, gave adequate warning of the proper and safe method of removal and repair of the bushing in light of the nature of the product and the potential danger *(see, Frederick v Niagara Mach. & Tool Works,*107 *934AD2d 1063; *Cooley v Carter-Wallace Inc.,*102 AD2d 642). Thus, we modify the order on appeal by denying the cross motion insofar as it seeks summary judgment dismissing that portion of the second cause of action asserting strict products liability based upon a failure to warn and by reinstating that portion of the complaint. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

NO. CIV. S-04-2470 LKK/KJM

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE DISPOSAL

DOCUMENTS AFTER

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11550 NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

MUSHROOM TRAIL, GRASS VALLEY,

NEVADA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APN:

43-130-31, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES

AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO,

Defendant.

 /

DAVID McELVAIN.

Claimant.

 /

Pursuant to representations made by counsel at a Settlement

Conference conducted before the Honorable William B. Shubb on April

24, 2006, the parties have settled the above-captioned case. The

court now orders that the dispositional documents disposing of the

case be filed no later than September 25, 2006.

////

Case 2:04-cv-02470-LKK -KJM Document 63 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby

VACATED.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO

CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 25, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02470-LKK -KJM Document 63 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 2