alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NLNK-2014.12.31-EX10.106


Exhibit 10.106









Iowa State University Research Park Corporation
2711 South Loop Drive, Suite 4050
Ames, Iowa 50010-8648


Memorandum of Agreement


DATE:    October 25, 2014


TO:        Carl Langren
BioProtection Systems Corporation 
2503 S. Loop Drive, Suite 5100
Ames, IA 50010


FROM:    Steven T. Carter, President


		
	RE:
	ADDENDUM TO THE LEASE BETWEEN ISU RESEARCH PARK CORPORATION AND BIOPROTECTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION DATED AUGUST 22, 2005.




The following information constitutes additions to the Lease Agreement between ISU Research Park Corporation (Landlord) and BioProtection Systems Corporation (Tenant). Upon signatures of appropriate representatives of Landlord and Tenant affixed to this Memorandum, this Memorandum becomes a part of that Lease Agreement dated August 22, 2005.


Tenant has requested and Landlord agrees to extend the lease for Suite 3900 (±3,147 rsf) in the following manner:


	
							
	 
	Sq. Ft.
	Sq. Ft.
	Monthly
	Monthly
	Annual
	Annual

	Base
	Operating
	Base
	Operating
	Base
	Operating

	Term
	Rents
	Rents
	Rents
	Rents
	Rents
	Rents

	11/1/2014-
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	10/31/2015
	$12.75
	Actual
	$3,343.69
	Actual
	$40,124.28
	Actual























Exhibit 10.106


BioProtection Systems Corp. Page Two
October 25, 2014




Tenant leases the space as is. Any modifications will be at the Tenant’s sole expense.  Landlord agrees to release Tenant from this lease obligation upon Tenant’s move into another facility at the ISU Research Park. Gas & water usage, as well as utility costs for the HVAC system, will be prorated & invoiced monthly. Electricity is metered separately & is invoiced directly from the provider. Subject to the terms of this Memorandum, Tenant agrees that all terms and conditions of the August 22, 2005 Lease and those described in this Memorandum shall remain in force.


Please sign and return both originals to my office by October 10, 2014 if you concur with the above terms. We will then send a fully executed copy for your records.




AGREED
FOR                    FOR
BioProtection Systems Corp.    ISU Research Park Corporation


/s/ Carl Langren            /s/ Steven Carter
Senior VP of Finance        Director
Title                    Title


10/25/2014                10/27/2014
Date                    Date
446 A.2d 681

#### Commonwealth v. Nance, Appellant.

Submitted October 14, 1981.

Jay H. Spiegel, for appellant; Robert L. Eberhardt, Deputy District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WIEAND, JOHNSON and MONTEMURO, JJ.

The judgment of sentence is affirmed.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |               |                                 |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:   May 10, 2011  | By:                | /s/ MICHAEL S. DUNLAP           |   |
|                                      | Name:              | Michael S. Dunlap                    |   |
|                                      | Title:   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                      |               | Principal Executive Officer          |   |

|   |               |                                                         |   |
|--------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |               |                                                         |   |
|   | By:                | /s/ TERRY J. HEIMES                                     |   |
|   | Name:              | Terry J. Heimes                                              |   |
|   | Title:   | Chief Financial Officer                                      |   |
|   |               | Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |   |
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gene Hodges, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Websense, Inc; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Websense as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. Websense’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for Websense and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Websense,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Websense’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisannual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this annual report any change in Websense’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring Websense’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Websense’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. Websense’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to Websense’s auditors and the audit committee of Websense’s board of directors: 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Websense’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in Websense’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: February 25, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 7 committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. The TAP will use citizen input to make recommendations to the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, April 19, 2007, Friday, April 20, 2007 and Saturday, April 21, 2007.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227, or 206-220-6096. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held                           ( print page 13161)                        Thursday, April 19, 2007 from 12:30 p.m. Pacific Standard Time to 4:30 p.m. Pacific Standard Time; Friday, April 20, 2007 from 8 a.m. Pacific Standard Time to 4:30 p.m. Pacific Standard Time; and Saturday, April 21, 2007 from 8 a.m. Pacific Standard Time to 11 a.m. Pacific Standard Time at 950 Hotel Circle North, San Diego, California. The public is invited to make oral comments. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Janice Spinks, TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     Due to limited space, notification of intent to participate in the meeting must be made with Janice Spinks. Miss Spinks can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096.                

The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

Dated: March 14, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E7-4969 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Before the Second Division,

July 17, 1939

No. 41828.

#### Protest 238983-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the items in question consist of Normandy laces similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-Qof Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30,2008, I, Martin S. Lapera, President and Chief Executive Officer of FrederickCounty Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) such Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2) the informationcontained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008,fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.

 

 

 
| /s/ Martin S. Lapera                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Martin S. Lapera                       |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS BURTON WATSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-04-2615 GEB KJM PS 

vs.

COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a California civil detainee proceeding with an action for violation of

civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 25, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause

why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to serve defendants with process

within 120 days of plaintiff filing his complaint. In response to the court’s order to show cause,

plaintiff requests that he be granted in forma pauperis status and that the U.S. Marshal be

directed to serve defendants. However, plaintiff has not submitted a completed application to

proceed in forma pauperis.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court send plaintiff an application to proceed in forma

pauperis; and 

Case 2:04-cv-02615-GEB -KJM Document 5 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Plaintiff complete the application and file it within thirty days of this order. 

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: March 28, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

wats2615.ifp

Case 2:04-cv-02615-GEB -KJM Document 5 Filed 03/29/06 Page 2 of 2
# FILED
January 27, 1999 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENN ESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

RAYMOND O. HAMPTON, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9712-CH-00721 VS. ) ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 97-2692-I TENNESSEE TRUCK SALES, INC. ) and DONALD A. TOMLINSON, ) ) Defendants/Appellees. ) 

### ORD ER O N PE TITION TO R EHE AR
The appellees have filed a Petiti on to Rehear asserting that the court overlooked the record from the former case in deciding that

the record did not

contain evidence on which a judgment of res judicata ( or collateral estoppel) co uld be based. Attached to the petition are copies of the papers fi led in the chancery cour t in the former case with a document called “Joint Notice of Filing” addressed to the Court of Appeals but filed in the c hancery cour t on September 16, 1998. There is no certification by theClerk and Master and thi s court’s docket does not indicate that the filing was ever forwarded to this court. We do find in this record, howev er, a motion to consolidate the two records an d an order reserving judgment on that motion because the t i me for filing a Rule 11 applic ation to the Supreme Court had not expired. The order further states that the reservation was wit hout preju dice to the right of the parties to obtain a duplic ate record from the trial court for filing in this appeal. Apparently the filing in the ch ancery cour t on September 16, 1998 was an effort on the part of the parties to ta ke advantage of this court’s sugg est ion, but the record from the chancery co urt was never filed i n this court.

All of th at being s aid, we have examined the record furnished with the2

Petition to Rehear and it confirms our initial conclusion that the breach of a bailment contract was not part of the prior action. The appellees assert that res judicata appliesto all issues that could have been raised in the former action, but the truck
wasstill in the possessi on of the defendant s when the agreed order w as entered terminating that action. The alleged bre ach ofthe bailment contract did not occur until the former action had been terminated. We do not see how the appellees can assert thatthe issues involv

ing a breach of the bailment relationship could have been raised in that action.

The appellant did seek Rule 60 r elief from the final judgment in the former case so that he could assert a claim essentially th e sameas the one raised in this case. The chancellor den ied that relief on the ground of

the appellant’s laches, and that judgment was affir med by this c ourt. But as we pointed out in the original opinion that judgment was on the Rule 60 motion, not on the merits of the bail ment claim. Therefore, it is order ed that the Petition to Rehear be overruled.

_______________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, PRESIDIN G JUDGE, M.S.

______________________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE

______________________________________ WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE
No. 41827.

#### Protest 310203-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 37230 the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was sustained.
36.5° N

36°N

1129 W 111.5° W
J, i \
a
ALN Ap
A) RSS nwsetti07
w
} ) 0 10 KILOMETERS
40.0 V | I Sar
SE36311D8 1__| £Neg — SWS8I 1107
v
NE3611108 —_J > <—— nweit1c7 }
[Ex )
i Pe Es \
ot $w36111C7 Navajo
Reservation
Ba
60.0 © | .NE3611167 | Nw36111B6
NW36111B7 ‘SW36111B6
SW36111B7@ SE3611187 SE36111B6
Little
—<— Colorado
River
NE36111A8
IW36111A7 NW36TT1A6] NES6TTTAG
80)
—— | Grand Canyon
National Park
SW36111A8] SE36111A8
6 : —

“a

]
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ John A. Bardis
John A. Bardis
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
May 8, 2009/s/ L. Neil Hunn
L. Neil Hunn
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 8, 2009
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the amended Annual Report of Basset Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Madam Sun Keqing, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  January 5, 2009 /s/ Madam Sun Keqing     Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Stephen M. Siedow, the Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer of MNS Eagle Equity Group III, Inc. (the "Company"),
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY, that:

     1.   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
          31, 2004 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 4th day of January, 2006.


                                 /s/ Stephen M. Siedow
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                     Stephen M. Siedow, Chief Executive Officer,
                                     President and Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to MNS Eagle Equity Group III, Inc. and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon
request.
Before the Second Division,

November 10, 1948

No. 52662.

protest 74458-K (Baltimore).

#### Allied Purchasing Corp. *v.*United States,

*235Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co. (33*C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VERNON LEE JAMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued December 19,1967

Decided December 27,1967.

*Mr. Edward I. Feinberg*for defendant-appellant.

*Mr. Solomon Forman*for plaintiff-respondent *{Mr. Robert N. McAllister, Jr.,*Atlantic County Prosecutor, attorney; *Mr. Solomon Forman*on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

After a joint trial with several others, appellant Yernon Lee James was convicted of sodomy. The convictions of two. of the co-defendants, John Shannon and John Henry Taylor, were reversed by this Court. *State v. Taylor,*46 *N. J.*316 (1966). On this direct appeal, which we allowed, James urges the same grounds *for*reversal as did Shannon and John Henry Taylor. We agree that the conviction of James was tainted with the same error which *11required the reversal in *State v. Taylor, supra.*Therefore the judgment of conviction must he reversed.

*For reversal*— Chief Justice Weintkaub and Justices Jacobs, Ekancts, Pboctok, Goldmann, Schettino and Haneman—7.

*For*affirmance—None.
Exhibit 99.3


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Total Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard B. Davis., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ RICHARD B. DAVIS
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Richard B. Davis

July 24, 2003
SCALE 1:24,000

WARE QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-I

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Ware Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by Janet R. Stone

2013

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1954.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Massachusetts

Geological Survey.

Map units were modified from Mulholland (1975). Some bedrock

outcrop areas are from Field (1976). Some postglacial units were

mapped using 2005 orthophoto images.

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 14 of 24)

(WIN

S

O

R

DA

M)

(N

O

R

TH

B

R

O

O

KFIELD)

(WARREN)

(PETERSHAM)

72°7'30"W

72°7'30"W

72°15'0"W

72°15'0"W

42°22'30"N

42°22'30"N

42°15'0"N

42°15'0"N

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

AND OFFICE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (MassGIS),

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION

Stone, J.R., compiler, 2013, Surficial geologic map

of the Mount Grace-Ashburnham-Monson-Webster

24-quadrangle area in central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-I

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/I.