12758 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 52 / Monday, March 19, 2007 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–122–822] 

Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon 

Steel Flat Products from Canada: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 11, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of its administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat 

products (CORE) from Canada. See 

Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon 

Steel Flat Products from Canada: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 

53363 (September 11, 2006) 

(Preliminary Results). The review covers 

shipments of this merchandise to the 

United States for the period August 1, 

2004 through July 31, 2005, made by 

Dofasco Inc., Sorevco Inc. (Sorevco), 

and Do Sol Galva Ltd. (collectively 

Dofasco), and by Stelco Inc. 

We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on our 

Preliminary Results. Based on our 

analysis of comments, we have made 

changes in the margin calculations. 

Therefore, the final results differ from 

the preliminary results. For the final 

dumping margins, see the ‘‘Final Results 

of Review’’ section below. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 19, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Douglas Kirby or Joshua Reitze, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3782 or (202) 482–

0666, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 11, 2006, the 

Department published its preliminary 

results in the antidumping duty 

administrative review of CORE from 

Canada. See Preliminary Results. The 

period of review (POR) is August 1, 

2004 through July 31, 2005. This review 

covers the following Canadian 

producers of subject merchandise: 

Dofasco Inc., Sorevco Inc., and Do Sol 

Galva Ltd., which have been collapsed 

into a single entity (collectively, 

Dofasco) for purposes of calculating a 

dumping margin, and Stelco Inc. 

(Stelco). See the ‘‘Affiliation and 

Collapsing’’ section of the Preliminary 

Results, 71 FR at 53365. The petitioner 

is U.S. Steel Corporation (petitioner). 

We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on our 

Preliminary Results. Petitioner 

submitted case briefs for Dofasco and 

Stelco on October 11, 2006. Dofasco 

submitted a rebuttal brief on October 16, 

2006. None of the parties requested a 

hearing. 

Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order 

The product covered by this 

antidumping duty order is certain 

corrosion–resistant steel, and includes 

flat–rolled carbon steel products, of 

rectangular shape, either clad, plated, or 

coated with corrosion–resistant metals 

such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-, 

aluminum-, nickel- or iron–based alloys, 

whether or not corrugated or painted, 

varnished or coated with plastics or 

other nonmetallic substances in 

addition to the metallic coating, in coils 

(whether or not in successively 

superimposed layers) and of a width of 

0.5 inch or greater, or in straight lengths 

which, if of a thickness less than 4.75 

millimeters, are of a width of 0.5 inch 

or greater and which measures at least 

10 times the thickness or if of a 

thickness of 4.75 millimeters or more 

are of a width which exceeds 150 

millimeters and measures at least twice 

the thickness, as currently classifiable in 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) under item 

numbers 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060, 

7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 

7210.49.0090, 7210.61.0000, 

7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 

7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 

7210.90.1000, 7210.90.6000, 

7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 

7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 

7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 

7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 

7212.50.0000, 7212.60.0000, 

7215.90.1000, 7215.90.3000, 

7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 

7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560, 

7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 

7217.90.5060, and 7217.90.5090. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise is dispositive. 

Included in this order are corrosion–

resistant flat–rolled products of nonrectangular cross-section where such 

cross-section is achieved subsequent to 

the rolling process (i.e., products which 

have been ‘‘worked after rolling’’) -- for 

example, products which have been 

beveled or rounded at the edges. 

Excluded from this order are flat–rolled 

steel products either plated or coated 

with tin, lead, chromium, chromium 

oxides, both tin and lead (‘‘terne plate’’), 

or both chromium and chromium oxides 

(‘‘tin–free steel’’), whether or not 

painted, varnished or coated with 

plastics or other nonmetallic substances 

in addition to the metallic coating. Also 

excluded from this order are clad 

products in straight lengths of 0.1875 

inch or more in composite thickness 

and of a width which exceeds 150 

millimeters and measures at least twice 

the thickness. Also excluded from this 

order are certain clad stainless flatrolled products, which are three–

layered corrosion–resistant carbon steel 

flat–rolled products less than 4.75 

millimeters in composite thickness that 

consist of a carbon steel flat–rolled 

product clad on both sides with 

stainless steel in a 20%-60%-20% ratio. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

The issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs submitted by parties to 

this administrative review are addressed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of 

the Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Certain 

Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from Canada, from Stephen J. 

Claeys to David M. Spooner, dated 

March 12, 2007 (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum), which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. The Issues and 

Decisions Memorandum is on file in the 

Central Records Unit (CRU), room B–

099 of the Department of Commerce 

main building and can be accessed 

directly at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The 

paper copy and electronic version of the 

Issues and Decisions Memorandum are 

identical in content. A list of the issues 

addressed in the Issues and Decisions 

Memorandum is appended to this 

notice. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of comments 

received, we have made minor 

adjustments in the methodology that 

was used in the Preliminary Results and 

corrected certain calculation errors. The 

adjustments are discussed in detail in 

the Issues and Decisions Memorandum. 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

determine that the following weighted–

average dumping margins exist for the 

period August 1, 2004 through July 31, 

2005: 

Manufacturer/Exporter Weighted Average 

Margin 

Dofasco Inc., Sorevco, 

Inc., Do Sol Galva 

Ltd. ............................ 5.25 percent 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 52 / Monday, March 19, 2007 / Notices 12759 

Manufacturer/Exporter Weighted Average 

Margin 

Stelco Inc. ..................... 1.51 percent 

Assessment 

The Department will determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.212(b). The Department 

calculated importer- specific duty 

assessment rates (or, when the importer 

was unknown by the respondent, 

customer–specific duty assessment 

rates) on the basis of the ratio of the total 

amount of antidumping duties 

calculated for the examined sales 

observations involving each importer to 

the total entered value of the examined 

sales observations for that importer. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 356.8(a), the 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 41 days after the 

date of publication of these final results 

of review. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by companies 

included in these final results of review 

for which the reviewed companies did 

not know their merchandise was 

destined for the United States. In such 

instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the ‘‘All 

Others’’ rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. For a discussion of this 

clarification, see Notice of Policy 

Concerning Assessment of Antidumping 

Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

Cash Deposits 

Pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the 

Department revoked this order and 

notified U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection to discontinue suspension of 

liquidation and collection of cash 

deposits on entries of the subject 

merchandise entered or withdrawn from 

warehouse on or after December 15, 

2005, the effective date of revocation of 

this AD order. See Revocation Pursuant 

to Second Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews 

of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Orders: Certain Corrosion–

Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products 

from Australia, Canada, Japan, and 

France, 72 FR 7010 (February 14, 2007). 

Certificate on Reimbursement 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred, and in the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders. 

This notice is the only reminder to 

parties subject to the administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and this notice in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930. 

Dated: March 12, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. 

Appendix 

List of Issues 

1. Treatment of Dofasco’s bad debt 

allowance 

2. Application of the major input rule to 

Dofasco’s purchase of iron ore fluxed 

pellets from Quebec Cartier Mining 

(QCM) 

3. Treatment of Dofasco’s indirect 

selling expenses incurred in Canada 

4. Treatment of Dofasco’s inventory 

carrying costs incurred in Canada 

5. Application of the arm’s length test 

6. Treatment of Dofasco’s home market 

indirect selling expenses in the 

calculation of the net price used in the 

sales below cost test 

7. Calculation of credit expense for 

certain of Stelco’s U.S. sales 

[FR Doc. E7–4942 Filed 3–16–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–803] 

Notice of Amended Final Results in 

Accordance With Court Decision: 

Heavy Forged Hand Tools from the 

People’s Republic of China 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 19, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Martin or Mark Manning; AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 4, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3936 or (202) 482–

5253, respectively. 

SUMMARY: On March 10, 2007, the 

appeals period expired with respect to 

a decision of the United States Court of 

International Trade (‘‘CIT’’), which had 

sustained the final results in part, and 

the remand determination in part, of the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) in the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty orders 

on heavy forged hand tools (‘‘HFHTs’’) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’), covering the period February 

1, 2001, through January 31, 2002. See 

Shandong Huarong Machinery Co. v. 

United States and Ames True Temper, 

Slip Op. 07–3 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007) 

(‘‘Shandong Huarong II’’). As there is 

now a final court decision, we are 

amending the final results of the review 

in this matter. We will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to liquidate entries subject to these 

amended final results. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 10, 2003, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register the final results of review for 

the eleventh review of HFHTs from the 

PRC. See Heavy Forged Hand Tools, 

Finished or Unfinished, With or Without 

Handles, From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of the 

Order on Bars and Wedges, 68 FR 53347 

(September 10, 2003) (‘‘Final Results’’). 

The period of review (‘‘POR’’) was 

February 1, 2001, through January 31, 

2002. Shandong Huarong Machinery Co. 

(‘‘Huarong’’) filed a summons on 

September 18, 2003, and filed a 

complaint on September 25, 2003, 

challenging the Department’s Final 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES