alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than March 30, 2007.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Donna J. Ward, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1. Douglas J. Compton*, Lawrence, Kansas; to acquire voting shares of First Financial Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The Lawrence Bank, both in Lawrence, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 12, 2007.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E7-4790 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 32.0



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Connecticut Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Richard P. Meduski                           
|                     |  | Richard P. Meduski                               
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                     |  | (principal executive officer)                    
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ Michael J. Hartl                             
|                     |  | Michael J. Hartl                                 
|                     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  | (principal accounting and financial officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER LEE JENKINS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1152 MCE GGH P

vs.

J.G. ARCEO, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action 

filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By concurrently filed order, this court has found this 

amended complaint sets forth some cognizable claims against certain defendants. However, for 

the majority of the defendants and claims, this court finds dismissal appropriate for the reasons

extensively set forth in the court’s order filed on December 12, 2005.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

1. Plaintiff’s claims against J. Valadez, Vincent Cullen, Glen Riddle, V. Sanchez,

J.G. Arceo, Tony Loftin, N. Grannis, J.L. Schmidt, M. P. Gallagher, C. Semel, S. Ortiz, T.

Surges, James L. Deason, S.O. Kephart, B. Curry, L. H. Dizung, J. Valdez, M. Veal, Crawford,

Duncan, L. Buccinio, A. Swanson, Nadim K. Khoury, P. Enriquez, Dizmang, J. M. August, D. L.

Turner, Dr. H. Hasheem, M. Hodges, Dr. Pacifico, Sgt. T. Winters, Joyce Thompson, K.L.

Case 2:04-cv-01152-MCE -GGH Document 35 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Kirpinsky, M. Hodges-Wilkens, F. Gonzalez, R. Grenz, C/O Summers, Counselor Dominquez,

Lance Jensen, C/O Whitten, D. Shankland, J. Stocker, M. Bradley, J. Bick, R. Meyers, D.

Myers, R. Carney, M. Cry, Sgt. Goddard, Sgt. Stevens, Dr. Beck, Robert McGahey, Dr. Diznang,

Jeff Griffin, D. M. Cornez , J.E. Boyd, Counselor Dominguez, Counselor Ochoa, C. Buckley,

Harley G. Lapin, C/O Furnari, C/O Guy, J.C. Sanders be dismissed and these parties be

dismissed as defendants in this action; and 

2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants C/O Wilson, Sgt. Pemberton, Sgt. Foster

be dismissed with the exception of those specific colorable claims set forth both in the court’s

December 12, 2005 order and in the concurrently filed order as to defendants Wilson, Pemberton

and Foster.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court's order. Martinez v.Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 4/18/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

jenk1152.fr

Case 2:04-cv-01152-MCE -GGH Document 35 Filed 04/18/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 42939.

#### Protest 997441-G of J. E. Bieber (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The protest was submitted without evidence in support of the claims made. On the record presented it was overruled.
#### River Bank America, Appellant, v Pan American Mall, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Luis Moyett, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 205]

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated July 22, 1994, as upon reargument and renewal, adhered to the prior determination which, *inter alia,*denied the branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for leave to enter a deficiency judgment against the defendant Luis Moyett.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

RPAPL 1371 (2) requires that a motion to enter a deficiency judgment be made within 90 days after the date the sale is consummated by the delivery of the proper deed of conveyance to the purchaser *(Vittoria v Mazel, Bracha, Hatzlocha,*217 AD2d 657; *Roosevelt Sav. Bank v Tsotsos,*215 AD2d 547; *North Fork Bank & Trust Co. v Boe,*198 AD2d 336).

We agree with the Supreme Court that the. 90-day period within which to seek a deficiency judgment under RPAPL 1371 (2) commenced upon the Referee’s delivery of the deeds to the successful bidder, not when the successful bidder assigned its bid and then redelivered the deeds to its assignees.

Measuring the 90-day period from the date the Referee delivered the deeds to the successful bidder, the plaintiffs service of its motion papers was untimely. Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the facts do not warrant the application of an estoppel in connection with the plaintiffs attempted service upon Moyett’s counsel.

We have reviewed the plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Copertino, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 7 , 2012 .

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14
- 11
- 00885
- CR

DANIEL GARCIA ESCALA NTE, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1303094



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N A written request to withdraw the notice of appeal, personally signed by appellant, has been filed with this Court. See Tex. R. App . P. 42.2. Because this court has not issued an opinion, we grant appellant’s request.2

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the Clerk of the court to issue the mandate of the court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, C hristopher and Jamison. Do not publish

— Tex. R. App. P

. 47.2(b).
#### LENA RUTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NORTHWESTERN FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO., *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

See same case below: 72 *N. J. Super.*467.

*Mr. Samuel A. Gennet*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Morris Ruter*for the respondent.

May 14, 1962.
No. 45027.

#### Protests 39656-K, etc., of Dal, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Peat Import Corp.*v. *United States*(4 Oust. Ct. 181, C. D. 319) the claim for free entry under paragraph 1685 was sustained.
No. 46186.

#### Protest 782714-G of Renkin & Yates Smith Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celery sandwiches and piquant sandwiches the same in in all material respects as those the subject of *Renken*v. *United States*(1 Cust. Ct. 309, C. D. 73) the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of INTERNATIONAL MONETARY
SYSTEMS, LTS. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the
"Report"), I, Danny W Weibling, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Danny W
Weibling





Danny W
Weibling


Chief
Financial Officer





March 31,
2008
No. 66861.

#### Sniafibres Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 60/25541, etc. (New York).

*485Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon monofilament yarn and is so-called 15-denier monofilament nylon having a slight turn twist, composed of a single filament, weighing less than 150 deniers per length of 450 meters, and valued at more than $1.11% per pound, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of William A. Monnin, Jr., Deceased. Rose Marie Monnin, Appellant; William A. Monnin, Sr., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[635 NYS2d 574]

—Appeal from order insofar as it denied reargument unanimously dismissed and order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm that part of the order that denied petitioner’s motion for summary judgment without prejudice. The appeal from that part of the order that denied petitioner’s motion to reargue a prior motion is dismissed. An order denying a motion to reargue is not appealable *(see, Empire Ins. Co. v Food City,*167 AD2d 983, 984; Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s *974Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C2221:9, at 185). (Appeal from Order of Genesee County Surrogate’s Court, Morton, S.— Reargument.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
<PAGE>


                     32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kimberly A. Springsteen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/      Kimberly A. Springsteen
-------------------------------------
Kimberly A. Springsteen
Principal Financial Officer
November 10, 2005








                                                                              19
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BALMORHEA RANCHES, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

ANN ROSS HEYMANN,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00127-CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 18-01-22295-CVR)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5, for performance of the 

judgment and all costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
No. 45024.

#### Protests 789329-G, etc., of Consumers Import Co., Inc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the-authority *Peat Import Corp.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 181, C. D. 319) the-claim for free entry under paragraph 1685 was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.3
                                                           [English Translation]

                        SPECIAL SERVICE PROVIDER LICENSE

License No.              No. 110314

Corporate Name           Korea Thrunet Co., Ltd.

Name (Representative)    Seog Won Park (ID No. 110111-1303455)

Address                  1338-5 Seocho-dong, Seoch-ku, Seoul

Paid-in Capital          KRW 19,506,502,500

Service                  Type 2 Reseller

Conditions of License    As attached

I hereby grant you a special service provider license in accordance with Article
19 of the Telecommunications Business Act and Article 12 (2) of the Enforcement
Rules under the same Act.

                                 April 21, 2005

                  CHIEF OF SEOUL REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
                             (Official seal affixed)

<PAGE>

                              CONDITIONS OF LICENSE

                                                         Korea Thrunet Co., Ltd.

      A special service provider whose revenue from the services licensed
hereunder for the current year is more than Won 30 billion and who realizes a
net profit in the current year, is required to make a contribution in the
following year to the Information Promotion Fund in the amount of 0.5% of its
revenue (to the extent that the amount of such contribution does not exceed the
amount of its net profit in the current year).

                                  <Recommended>

In the event network service providers do not impose any charges on calls of not
longer than 3 seconds, special service providers shall not impose any charges on
such calls either.

                  CHIEF OF SEOUL REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
(Reap. Dec. 8543)

#### Carl Hirschmann Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 14582.

(Decided February 21, 1956)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawreNCe, Judge:

When this appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the appealing party.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of this court provides that—

> * * * Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

In conformity with the requirements of the rule, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein *530which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 51753.

#### Protests 56355-K, etc., of Fook Lee & Co. et al. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10152)

#### United States *v.*Baxter Co. Customhouse Brokers, Inc.

Entry No. 1594.

(Decided January 25, 1962)

*William S. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Ford, Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement listed above, has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise invoiced as seamless steel casing and EUE steel tubing is not on the final list (T.D. 54521) and that at the time of exportation such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for exportation to the United States pursuant to Section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and that the export values are the invoice unit values, net, less ocean freight as invoiced.

> IT IS FURTHER AGREED that this case be and hereby is submitted for decision upon the foregoing stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find and hold the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of *5301956 (Public Law 927, 84th Congress), T.D. 45165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such export values are the invoice unit values, net, less ocean freight, as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Case *No.*14,502.

#### UNITED STATES v. BAKER.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 268.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1805.

Assault and Battery — Right op Plaintiff’s Agent to Enter Defendant’s House — Levy.

1. The officer cannot justify under a fieri facias, without producing it.

2. An agent of the plaintiff has a right to enter the house of the defendant with the officer to show him the defendant’s goods to be taken on the fieri facias; end the authority of the agent need not be in writing, but may be proved by the testimony of the agent himself.

This was an indictment against [Samuel] Baker for an assault and battery upon W. Howard, who entered Baker’s house with the officer who had an execution against the goods of Baker, at the suit of Barry. Howard accompanied the officer at the request of the plaintiff, and as his agent to show the goods to the officer

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

decided that Howard was a competent witness to prove his own authority as agent of the plaintiff; that it was not necessary that the authority should have been given in writing, and that he had a right to enter the house with the officer, and to remain in the house long enough to show the property, and for the officer to take an inventory. Verdict guilty; fined'ten dollars.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of East Coast Diversified Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2008 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Richard Margulies, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard Margulies

Richard MarguliesChief Executive OfficerDated: September 19, 2008

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to East Coast Diversified Corporationand will be retained by East Coast Diversified Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.