alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

April 24, 1946

No. 51035.

#### Protest 947300-G of Edward P. Paul & Co., Inc. (New York).

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This case comes before us on the granting of a motion for rehearing of our original decision of October 3, 1945, reported as Abstract 50550. In that decision we held the imported glass trays to be dutiable under paragraph 230 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, as manufactures of glass, not specially provided for. That decision was based upon the following stipulation:

It is further agreed between counsel that the tray is a table or kitchen article or utensil; that it is composed wholly or in chief value of glass pressed and unpolished, except that the bottom surfaces of the two legs thereof were ground and then polished for purposes other than ornamentation, to wit, to make the said bottom surfaces smooth and level, and that the tray and candle holders are not an entirety.

It was apparent that the effect of this stipulation was to present to the court the sole issue as to whether or not the polishing was sufficient to remove the article from the provision of paragraph 218 (g) for glassware “when pressed and unpolished, whether or not decorated or ornamented in any manner * * *.”

The Government in its brief in support of the motion for a rehearing states that upon the original submission of the case the “defendant was under the impression that the question of whether or not the trays were decorated was not in issue, *262believing that tbe sole issue in the case was whether or not the polishing was sufficient to remove the articles frqm paragraph 218 (g).” We held that it was.

The Government now contends that the glass trays in question are decorated within the meaning of the provisions of paragraph 218 (f), as classified. Our attention is directed to the fact that our appellate court has held that “decorated or ornamented in any manner” as used in paragraph 84, Tariff Act of 1913 (identical language appearing in the present law), did not necessarily contemplate a separate operation but included decoration or ornamentation produced in the mold *(Smith & Co.*v. *United States,*8 Ct. Cust. Appls. 256, T. D. 37535).

In the present case, in so classifying the imported merchandise the collector found these trays to be decorated or ornamented. This action of the collector is presumptively correct. The plaintiff has introduced no testimony on this point and we must therefore find that the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification has not been overcome.

We therefore hold the imported article of merchandise to be properly dutiable .as assessed under the provisions of paragraph 218 (f) for “Table * * * .articles * * * composed wholly or in chief value of glass * * * deco-Tated or ornamented in any manner * * * 60 per centum ad valorem.”

Our decision in *E. P. Paul & Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*Abstract 50550, is ieversed and the protest is overruled.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY J. BIGGS, No. CIV-S-04-2667 MCE/CMK

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, 

ET AL., 

Respondent.

__________________________/

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

General Order No. 262.

On May 17, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-02667-MCE -CMK Document 9 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Neither party has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 17, 2005, are

adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is

denied.

DATED: June 30, 2005

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02667-MCE -CMK Document 9 Filed 06/30/05 Page 2 of 2
#### William Shayne, trading and doing business as Dixie Music Co., v. H. H. Pike.

180 So. 382.

Order Entered March 31, 1938.

*Murrell & Malone, Albert S. Dubbin, H. H. Wells*and *B. K. Roberts,*for Petitioner;

*L. J. Cushman*and /. *Velma Keen,*for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Respondent, the Judges and the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, having moved the 'Court that the Transcript of the Record, certified by the said Clerk and filed in this Court on October 12, 1937, be taken and used in this cause, representing that the said Transcript is a complete Transcript of all the proceedings and the judgment in the cause in the Court below, and the motion having been duly considered, it is now or*863dered and adjudged by the Court that such motion be and it is hereby granted and that the aforesaid Transcript be taken and used as the Return to the Writ of Certiorari issued in this cause.

And Counsel for Petitioner having moved the Court to quash the judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County to which the said Writ of Certiorari is addressed and this motion having been duly considered after notice given to Counsel for Respondents, and it appearing that the questions involved in this controversy have been settled by this Court in its opinion filed herein on January 14, 1938, upon the application of the Petitioner for a Writ of Certiorari, and that under the law of the case as determined by such opinion, the said judgment of the Circuit Court herein should be quashed, it is now thereupon ordered and adjudged by the Court that the motion of Counsel for Petitioner to quash the judgment of the Circuit Court in- this cause should be and it is hereby granted.

It is further ordered by the Court that the motion of Counsel for Respondent to quash the Writ of Certiorari issued in this cause be and it is hereby denied. ■

Ellts, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Chapman, J. J., concur.
No. 56446.

protest 169742-K (New York).

#### J. S. Carulli Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial a witness for the plaintiff testified that bale No. 175, reported by the discharging inspector as “manifested not found,” was not in fact received by the importer. In view of the evidence in this case and following *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351), it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portion of the merchandise as was reported by the inspector as manifested not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
(LOGO)AMERICA FIRST CREDIT UNION


As of and for the year ended  December 3l, 1999,  America  First  Credit Union
(AFCU)  has  complied  in all  material  respects  with  the  minimum  servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's  Uniform
Single Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same year,
AFCU had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount
of $10,000,000 and $500,000, respectively.


Rick Craig, President and CEO

March 24, 2000


Rex Rollo, Cheif Financial Officer
March 24, 2000


Lary Kano, Mortgage Servicing Department Manager
March 24, 2000



With You In Mind
P.O. BOX 9199 * OGDEN, UT 84409 * (801)627-0900 * SALT LAKE CITY, UT *
(801)966-5553 * WATS-IN-STATE AND OUT-OF-STATE 1-800-999-3961
www.americafirst.com
No. 51752.

#### Protests 34439-K, etc., of Chews Produce Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinon by

Cline, *J.*

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-41347

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REYNALDO ACOSTA-GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:99-CR-41-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reynaldo

Acosta-Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Acosta has received copies of counsel’s motion and brief, but he

has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s

Anders brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of Sysview Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
         2006 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
         all materials respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

                                                         Date: April 3, 2007
                                                         /S/ DARWIN HU
                                                         -------------
                                                         Darwin Hu, Chairman and
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Crown Marketing (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay Hooper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|                           |                                                             
|-------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  September 18, 2014 | /s/ Jay Hooper                                              
|                           | By:  Jay Hooper                                             
|                           | Its:  Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Crown Marketing and will be retained by Crown Marketing and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4940 

To provide a civil remedy for an individual whose rights have been violated 

by a person acting under Federal authority, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Mr. PADILLA, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. WELCH, Mr. 

MARKEY, and Ms. HIRONO) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide a civil remedy for an individual whose rights 

have been violated by a person acting under Federal 

authority, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bivens Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4940 IS

1 SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTION AGAINST PERSON ACTING UNDER 

2 FEDERAL AUTHORITY. 

3 Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 

4 1983) is amended by inserting ‘‘of the United States or’’ 

5 before ‘‘of any State’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 10
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 10
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 10
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
  In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of California
News Tech for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of California News Tech for the quarter
      ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
    the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of California News
      Tech. 
 By:
    /s/ Marian
      MunzName:
    Marian
      MunzTitle:
    Principal
      Executive Officer and DirectorDate:
    May
      16, 2005By:
    /s/ Robert C.
      JasperName:
    Robert
      C. JasparTitle:
    Principal
      Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
    May
      16, 2005
#### Cubit C. Durrant and others, *Respondents, v.*Joseph Foxell and others, *Appellants.*

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of-Appeals denied.
**EXHIBIT 24****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, an officerand/or director of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation, a North Carolinaholding company, does hereby constitute and appoint Robert A.Reed, Richard T. Stange, and Andrea H. Fox, and each of them(with full power of substitution to appoint any Senior Officer,Vice President, Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Company)as his or her true and lawful attorney and agent, to do any andall acts and things and to execute any and all instruments whichsaid attorney and agent may deem necessary or advisable toenable the Corporation to comply with the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations andrequirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission inrespect thereof, in connection with the filing of the annualreport for the year 2004 or any later year on Form 10-K,including specifically, but without limiting the generality ofthe foregoing, the power and authority to sign for and on behalfof the undersigned the name of the undersigned as officer and/ordirector of the said corporation to any such Form 10-K orto any amendment thereto filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and to any instrument or document filed as part of,as an exhibit to or in connection with, said Form 10-K; andthe undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm as his own actand deed all that said attorney and agent (or the substitute)shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has subscribed thesepresents.   (SEAL)     Name:     Date: February 14, 2005
E-27
#### State, *ex rel.*Robert H. Herring, v. D. C. Coleman, as Sheriff of Dade County.

179 So. 735.

Division A.

Opinion Filed March 3, 1938.

*Van C. Swearingen,*for Plaintiff;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Tyrus A. Nortvood,*Assistant Attorney General, for Defendant.

Per Curiam.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. It grew out of conviction in the case of Robert H. Herring, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error, opinion and judgment in which was filed at this term of the Court.

After conviction the defendant filed petition in habeas corpus in this Court to test the sufficiency of the verdict and at the same time took writ of error from the conviction.

Both cases came on to be heard here at the same time. The judgment in this case must be ruled by the opinion and judgment in the case presented on writ of error.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the writ of habeas corpus is quashed and the petitioner remanded to the custody of the Sheriff.

So ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J„ concur in the opinion and judgment.
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of Nathaniel Energy  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form  10-KSBA,  Amendment  No. 3 for the period  ended  December  31, 2002 fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information  contained in such Annual
Report  on Form  10-KSBA,  Amendment  No. 3  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 20, 2004                       /s/ Stanley Abrams
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Stanley Abrams
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Principal Accounting Officer
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-401 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EDUCATION 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the EUROPEAN COMMUNITY 

Signed at Vienna June 21, 2006 

 

 

 with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
EUROPEAN COMMUNITY 

Education 

 Agreement signed at Vienna June 21, 2006; 

 Entered into force April 1, 2007. 

 With annex. 
















NOTE: Only English text will be printed in this publication.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fruit Of The Loom Unsecured Creditors Trust (the UCT) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Edward Clingman, Jr., a principal of Clingman & Hanger Management Associates, LLC, Trust Administrator of
the UCT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the UCT.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                        |  |                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: December 14, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | Clingman & Hanger Management Associates, LLC as Trust Administrator of the Fruit Of The Loom Unsecured Creditors Trust
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | /s/    W. EDWARD CLINGMAN, JR.                                                                                        
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                        |  | W. Edward Clingman, Jr. Principal