Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 51 / Friday, March 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 12565 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) unless OMB waives such review, 

as any regulatory action that is likely to 

result in a rule that may: (1) Have an 

annual effect on the economy of $100 

million or more or adversely affect in a 

material way the economy, a sector of 

the economy, productivity, competition, 

jobs, the environment, public health or 

safety, or State, local, or tribal 

governments or communities; (2) create 

a serious inconsistency or otherwise 

interfere with an action taken or 

planned by another agency; (3) 

materially alter the budgetary impact of 

entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan 

programs or the rights and obligations of 

recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel 

legal or policy issues arising out of legal 

mandates, the President’s priorities, or 

the principles set forth in the Executive 

Order. 

The economic, interagency, 

budgetary, legal, and policy 

implications of this final rule have been 

examined and it has been determined 

not to be a significant regulatory action 

under Executive Order 12866. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

hereby certifies that this final rule will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

as they are defined in the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This 

final rule would not directly impact any 

small entities or individuals. Therefore, 

pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this final 

rule is exempt from the initial and final 

regulatory flexibility analysis 

requirements of sections 603–604. 

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

The Catalog of Federal Domestic 

Assistance numbers for the programs 

affected by this final rule are 64.201 and 

64.202. 

List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 2 

Authority delegations (Government 

agencies), Veterans Affairs Department. 

Approved: March 2, 2007. 

Gordon H. Mansfield, 

Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

■ For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 38 CFR part 2 is amended as 

follows: 

PART 2—DELEGATIONS OF 

AUTHORITY 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 2 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 302, 552a; 38 U.S.C. 

501, 512, 515, 1729, 1729A, 5711; 44 U.S.C. 

3702, unless otherwise noted. 

■ 2. Section 2.6 is amended by revising 

paragraph (f)(3) to read as follows. 

§ 2.6. Secretary’s delegations of authority 

to certain officials (38 U.S.C. 512). 

* * * * * 

(f) * * * 

(3) To accept donations, except offers 

of land, made in any manner, for the 

beautification or benefit of national 

cemeteries. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. E7–4826 Filed 3–15–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

39 CFR Part 232 

Conduct on Postal Property; Weapons 

Prohibition 

AGENCY: Postal Service. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Postal Service is 

amending the rules for conduct on 

Postal Service property to clarify the 

prohibition of carrying or storing on 

Postal Service property any firearms or 

other dangerous weapons, or deadly 

weapons or explosives, except for 

official purposes. 

DATES: Effective March 16, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lawrence Katz, Inspector in Charge, 

Office of Counsel, U.S. Postal Inspection 

Service, 202–268–7732. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

amendment to the prohibition of 

carrying, either openly or concealed, or 

storing any firearms, other dangerous or 

deadly weapons or explosives on Postal 

Service property is to clarify the rule, 

ensuring that these items are only 

possessed for official purposes. This 

change would eliminate potential 

conflicts with other laws, rules or 

regulations which may allow the 

possession of these articles for other 

than official purposes. 

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 232 

Authority delegations (Government 

agencies), Crime, Federal buildings and 

facilities, Government property, Law 

enforcement officers, Postal Service, 

Security measures. 

■ In view of the considerations 

discussed above, the Postal Service 

adopts the following amendment to 39 

CFR part 232. 

PART 232—CONDUCT ON POSTAL 

PROPERTY 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 232 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 18 U.S.C. 13, 3061; 21 U.S.C. 

802, 844; 39 U.S.C. 401, 403(b)(3), 404(a)(7), 

1201(2). 

■ 2. In § 232.1, paragraph (l) is revised 

to read as follows: 

§ 232.1 Conduct on postal property. 

* * * * * 

(l) Weapons and explosives. 

Notwithstanding the provisions of any 

other law, rule or regulation, no person 

while on postal property may carry 

firearms, other dangerous or deadly 

weapons, or explosives, either openly or 

concealed, or store the same on postal 

property, except for official purposes. 

* * * * * 

Stanley F. Mires, 

Chief Counsel, Legislative. 

[FR Doc. E7–4803 Filed 3–15–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2006–0542; FRL–8285–3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Wisconsin; Cook Composites and 

Polymers Company 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is approving 

Wisconsin’s April 25, 2006, submittal of 

a source specific revision to revise its 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the 

control of volatile organic compounds. 

The revision consists of language 

contained in an Administrative 

Decision, dated February 24, 2005, 

approving an equivalent control system 

to meet reasonably available control 

technology (RACT) emission control 

requirements for Cook Composites and 

Polymers Company located in Saukville, 

Wisconsin, in Ozaukee County. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective May 15, 2007, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by April 16, 

2007. If adverse comments are received, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–

OAR–2006–0542, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
12566 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 51 / Friday, March 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

3. Fax: (312) 886–5824. 

4. Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief, 

Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney, 

Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal 

holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2006–

0542. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov 

Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’

system, which means EPA will not 

know your identity or contact 

information unless you provide it in the 

body of your comment. If you send an 

e-mail comment directly to EPA without 

going through www.regulations.gov your 

e-mail address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Charles 

Hatten, Environmental Engineer, at 

(312) 886–6031 before visiting the 

Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charles Hatten, Environmental 

Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031, 

Hatten.Charles@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. General Information 

II. Review of Wisconsin’s Plan 

III. What Change is Wisconsin Requesting? 

IV. Why is the Request Approvable? 

V. What Action is EPA Taking Today? 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. General Information 

This rulemaking applies to Cook 

Composites and Polymers Company 

located in Saukville, Wisconsin, in 

Ozaukee County, and the control of 

volatile organic compounds (VOC) 

emissions from its synthetic resin 

manufacturing operations. The revision 

consists of language contained in a 

Administrative Decision (AM–05–200), 

dated February 24, 2005, approving the 

use of a high efficiency thermal oxidizer 

as an equivalent control system to meet 

VOC reasonably available control 

technology (RACT) emission control 

requirements in section NR 

412.05(2)(a)(2) of the Wisconsin 

Administrative Code. 

II. Review of Wisconsin’s Plan 

Wisconsin’s Current SIP 

On August 15, 1994, EPA approved 

rule NR 421.05 of the Wisconsin 

Administrative Code, as a VOC RACT 

requirement to control emissions from 

synthetic resin manufacturing facilities. 

See Federal Register 59 FR 41709. 

Under the existing federally-approved 

SIP for Wisconsin, the requirements in 

NR 421.05 apply to stationary sources 

located in the counties of Kenosha, 

Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Racine, 

Washington and Waukesha. 

Applicability of Wisconsin Rule NR 

412.05 

In chapter NR 421 of Wisconsin 

Administrative Code, section NR 

421.05, this VOC RACT requirement 

specifically applies to the control of 

VOC emissions from ‘‘reaction tanks, 

thinning tanks, blending tanks and other 

process vessels used in any synthetic 

resin manufacturing facility.’’ The 

RACT rule prescribes the use of a 

surface condenser system for control of 

VOC emissions, but also allows for the 

use of an alternative control technology. 

The rule establishes a procedure for the 

State and EPA approval of alternative 

control technology. Section NR 

421.05(2)(a) states, ‘‘any equally 

effective control method or equivalent 

system approved by the department 

under this paragraph shall be submitted 

to, and will not become effective for 

federal purposes until approved by, the 

administrator or designee as a sourcespecific revision to the department’s 

state implementation plan for ozone. 

The emission control system shall be 

one of the following: 

1. A surface condenser, or equally 

effective control device approved by the 

department, and a vapor recovery or 

control system that reduces emissions 

from the surface condenser or equally 

effective device by 85%. 

2. An equivalent system or approach 

demonstrated to reliably control 

emissions from a process that does not 

include a condenser by not less than 

90% as approved by the department.’’

III. What Change Is Wisconsin 

Requesting? 

On April 25, 2006, Wisconsin 

submitted to EPA a source specific SIP 

revision in the form of an 

Administrative Decision (AM–05–200) 

requesting approval to establish VOC 

RACT requirements for Cook 

Composites and Polymers Company, 

applicable to its synthetic resin 

manufacturing facility. Because Cook 

Composites and Polymers Company 

installed a thermal oxidizer instead of a 

surface condenser system as an 

emission control system, section NR 

421.05(2)(a) requires Wisconsin to 

submit a request to EPA to approve the 

use of the thermal oxidizer as a source 

specific revision to Wisconsin’s SIP. 

The VOC RACT requirement in section 

NR 421.05(2)(a)(2) requires an 

‘‘equivalent control system or approach 

demonstrated to reliably control VOC 

emissions from a process that does not 

include a condenser by not less than 

90%.’’ The Administrative Decision 

(AM–05–200) includes a decision by the 

State of Wisconsin approving the use of 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 51 / Friday, March 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 12567 

a high-efficiency thermal oxidizer to 

meet the VOC RACT emission control 

requirement in section NR 

421.05(2)(a)(2). 

IV. Why Is the Request Approvable? 

The findings of fact contained in the 

Administrative Decision (AM–05–200), 

along with a copy of the compliance 

emission test report, show that the 

thermal oxidizer meets VOC RACT 

emission control requirements 

contained in section NR 421.05(2)(a)(2). 

The test to determine the thermal 

oxidizer’s VOC destruction and removal 

efficiency demonstrated an average VOC 

destruction and removal efficiency of 

99.7%, well within the parameters of 

‘‘an equivalent system or approach 

demonstrated to reliably control 

emissions from a process that does not 

include a condenser by not less than 

90%.’’

V. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? 

Based on the rationale set forth above, 

EPA is approving the revision to the 

Wisconsin SIP regarding Administrative 

Decision (AM–05–200), concerning 

Cook Composites and Polymers 

Company (synthetic resin 

manufacturing facility) and its use of a 

high-efficiency thermal oxidizer to be an 

equivalent control system or approach 

to meet VOC RACT emission control 

requirements contained in section NR 

421.05(2)(a)(2). 

We are publishing this action without 

prior proposal because we view this as 

a noncontroversial amendment and 

anticipate no adverse comments. 

However, in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register publication, we 

are publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

state plan if relevant adverse written 

comments are filed. This rule will be 

effective May 15, 2007 without further 

notice unless we receive relevant 

adverse written comments by April 16, 

2007. If we receive such comments, we 

will withdraw this action before the 

effective date by publishing a 

subsequent document that will 

withdraw the final action. All public 

comments received will then be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on the proposed action. The EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this action should do so 

at this time. If we do not receive any 

comments, this action will be effective 

May 15, 2007. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review 

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 

51735, October 4, 1993), this action is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

and, therefore, is not subject to review 

by the Office of Management and 

Budget. 

Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

Because it is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866 or a ‘‘significant energy 

action,’’ this action is also not subject to 

Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001). 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

This action merely approves state law 

as meeting Federal requirements and 

imposes no additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. 

Accordingly, the Administrator certifies 

that this rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.). 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

Because this rule approves preexisting requirements under state law 

and does not impose any additional 

enforceable duty beyond that required 

by state law, it does not contain any 

unfunded mandate or significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments, as 

described in the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). 

Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This rule also does not have tribal 

implications because it will not have a 

substantial direct effect on one or more 

Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

as specified by Executive Order 13175 

(59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000). 

Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action also does not have 

Federalism implications because it does 

not have substantial direct effects on the 

states, on the relationship between the 

national government and the states, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999). This action merely 

approves a state rule implementing a 

federal standard, and does not alter the 

relationship or the distribution of power 

and responsibilities established in the 

Clean Air Act. 

Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

This rule also is not subject to 

Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997), because it is not 

economically significant. 

National Technology Transfer 

Advancement Act 

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s 

role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the 

absence of a prior existing requirement 

for the state to use voluntary consensus 

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 

to disapprove a SIP submission for 

failure to use VCS. It would thus be 

inconsistent with applicable law for 

EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, 

to use VCS in place of a SIP submission 

that otherwise satisfies the provisions of 

the Clean Air Act. Thus, the 

requirements of section 12(d) of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) do not apply. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

This rule does not impose an 

information collection burden under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Congressional Review Act 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this rule and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2). 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
12568 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 51 / Friday, March 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by May 15, 2007. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this rule for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Ozone, and 

Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: February 27, 2007. 

Steve Rothblatt, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

■ For the reasons stated in the preamble, 

part 52, chapter I, of title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart YY—Wisconsin 

■ 2. Section 52.2570 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(115) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2570 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(115) On April 25, 2006, Wisconsin 

submitted source specific SIP revision 

to revise its State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) for the control of volatile organic 

compounds (VOC) from synthetic resin 

manufacturing operations. The revision 

consists of language contained in an 

Administrative Decision (AM–05–200), 

dated February 24, 2005, approving the 

use of a high efficiency thermal oxidizer 

as an equivalent control system or 

approach to meet VOC RACT emission 

control requirements for Cook 

Composites and Polymers Company 

located in Saukville, Wisconsin, in 

Ozaukee County. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) The Administrative Decision 

(AM–05–200), dated February 24, 2005, 

issued by the Wisconsin Department of 

Natural Resources, establishes VOC 

RACT for Cook Composites and 

Polymers Company synthetic resin 

manufacturing facility located in 

Saukville, Wisconsin, in Ozaukee 

County. 

[FR Doc. E7–4771 Filed 3–15–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 271 

[EPA–R01–RCRA–2007–0135; FRL–8287–8] 

Vermont: Final Authorization of State 

Hazardous Waste Management 

Program Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Immediate final rule. 

SUMMARY: The State of Vermont has 

applied to EPA for final authorization of 

certain changes to its hazardous waste 

program under the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). 

EPA has determined that these changes 

satisfy all requirements needed to 

qualify for final authorization, and is 

authorizing the State’s changes through 

this immediate final action. 

DATES: This final authorization will 

become effective on May 15, 2007 

unless EPA receives adverse written 

comment by April 16, 2007. If EPA 

receives such comment, it will publish 

a timely withdrawal of this immediate 

final rule in the Federal Register and 

inform the public that this authorization 

will not take immediate effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–

RCRA–2007–0135, by one of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: leitch.sharon@epa.gov 

• Fax: (617) 918–0647, to the 

attention of Sharon Leitch 

• Mail: Sharon Leitch, Hazardous 

Waste Unit, EPA Region 1, One 

Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CHW), 

Boston, MA 02114–2023 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver 

your comments to: Sharon Leitch, 

Hazardous Waste Unit, Office of 

Ecosystem Protection, EPA Region 1, 

One Congress Street, 11th Floor, (CHW), 

Boston, MA 02114–2023. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Office’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Identify your comments 

as relating to Docket ID No. EPA–R01–

RCRA–2007–0135. EPA’s policy is that 

all comments received will be included 

in the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or claimed to be other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected through 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: EPA has established a docket 

for this action under Docket ID No. 

EPA–R01–RCRA–2007–0135. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although it may be listed in the index, 

some information might not be publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the following two locations: 

aves\rules.xml(i) EPA Region 1 Library, 

One Congress Street–11th Floor, Boston, 

MA 02114–2023; by appointment only; 

tel: (617) 918–1990; and (ii) Agency of 

Natural Resources, 103 South Main 

Street–West Office Building, Waterbury, 

Vermont, 05671–0404; Business Hours: 

7:45 AM to 4:30 PM, Monday through 

Friday; tel: (802) 241–3888. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sharon Leitch, Hazardous Waste Unit, 

EPA Region 1, One Congress Street, 

Suite 1100 (CHW), Boston, MA 02114–


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES