alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven C. Ackmann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:      March  21, 2006 | By:                                   | /s/  Steven C. Ackmann |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                                                     |  Steven C. Ackmann,              |
|                                                     | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

86

----
No. 59055.

protest 228855-K (San Francisco).

#### Haven Saw & Tool Co. and Joseph A. Paredes & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of the merchandise marked “A” consist of internal-combustion engines similar in all material respects to the articles involved in *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(41 C. C. P. A. 33, C. A. D. 525), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. It was held that the value of the items involved is the percentage of the appraised value of said power saws, as noted in green ink.on the invoices by the examiner.
1The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1971

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Carlos Penuelas-Santos, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: April 7, 1999

 Filed: April 12, 1999

___________

Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Penuelas-Santos pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute marijuana,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. At sentencing Penuelas-Santos argued, as relevant,

that he was eligible for relief under the “safety-valve” exception to the statutory

minimum sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 5C1.2 (1998). After hearing testimony from two government witnesses, the district

court1 found that Penuelas-Santos was not entitled to safety-valve relief, and
-2-

sentenced him to 60 months imprisonment (the statutory minimum) and four years

supervised release. Penuelas-Santos appeals, and we affirm.

After carefully reviewing the sentencing-hearing transcript, we reject PenuelasSantos’s argument that the court misinterpreted the language of section five of the

safety-valve statute, as the court’s reading tracked the statute’s and Guideline’s plain

language. See United States v. Akbani, 151 F.3d 774, 777 (8th Cir. 1998) (reviewing

de novo district court’s legal interpretation of terminology in Guidelines).

Furthermore, the burden was on Penuelas-Santos to show that he had satisfied the

statute’s elements, and we do not believe the district court clearly erred in finding that

Penuelas-Santos failed to truthfully provide all information he had “concerning the

offense or offenses that were part of the same course of conduct or of a common

scheme or plan.” See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 5C1.2(5) (1998); United States v. Weekly, 118 F.3d 576, 581 (8th Cir.) (standard

of review), modified on other grounds, 128 F.3d 1198 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S.

Ct. 611 (1997); United States v. Romo, 81 F.3d 84, 85-86 (8th Cir. 1996).

We also believe Penuelas-Santos’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

would be more appropriately addressed in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding where a

record can be fully developed. See United States v. Mitchell, 136 F.3d 1192, 1193

(8th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerome Waldo, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 510]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered March 7, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

During the second round of voir dire, the defense counsel exercised 8 of 9 peremptory challenges against white jurors. The defense counsel did not object to the court’s finding of a prima facie revers *e-Batson*violation, but asserted that it had challenged three of these white jurors because of relatives who were in law enforcement, and/or their crime-victim status. *391The trial court was then required to make a determination as to whether or not the proffered explanations were pretextual *(see, People v Allen,*86 NY2d 101). The court found that the defense counsel had failed to challenge black venirepersons who either had relatives in law enforcement or had been crime victims. The court denied those three peremptory challenges, finding the proffered explanations to be pretextual *(see, People v Hawthorne,*80 NY2d 873; *People v McCoy,*210 AD2d 508; *People v Jupiter,*210 AD2d 431; *People v Dixon,*202 AD2d 12; *People v Barnes,*198 AD2d 289). This determination is entitled to great deference on appeal and "will not be disturbed” where, as here, it is supported by the record *(see, People v Hernandez,*75 NY2d 350, *affd*500 US 352; *People v Guess,*208 AD2d 559; *People v Jones,*204 AD2d 485; *People v Bailey,*200 AD2d 677; *People v Mondello,*191 AD2d 462).

We agree with the trial court’s finding that in three instances the defendant improperly used his peremptory challenges, and therefore reject the defendant’s challenge to the court’s ruling.

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Thompson, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
Before the Third Division,

November 30, 1960

No. 64932.

#### Southwestern Drug Corporation *v.*United States,

protests 114986-K and 119495-K (Galveston).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co, Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018 (the “Report”) of Oxford Square Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce L. Rubin, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Bruce L. Rubin   | 
|-------------------- | 
|Name: Bruce L. Rubin | 
|Date: August 1, 2018 |
January 30, 1964

A.R.D. 166.

reappraisements R61/1342 and R61/5194.

#### United. States *v.*Kurt Orban Company, Incorporated,

Motion by appellee.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4936 

To require a study relating to the Minidoka National Historic Site. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Mr. RISCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require a study relating to the Minidoka National Historic 

Site. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GAO STUDY ON THE MINIDOKA NATIONAL HIS4 TORIC SITE. 

5 The Secretary of the Interior may not issue any au6 thorization for the project described in the notice of avail7 ability of the Bureau of Land Management entitled ‘‘No8 tice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact 

9 Statement for the Proposed Lava Ridge Wind Project in 

10 Jerome, Lincoln, and Minidoka Counties, ID’’ (89 Fed. 

11 Reg. 48681 (June 7, 2024)) (or a substantially similar 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4936 IS

1 project) unless and until the date on which the Comp2 troller General of the United States completes a report 

3 identifying potential adverse effects of the project on or 

4 to the Minidoka National Historic Site, wildlife, cultural 

5 resources, transportation, hunting, wetlands, and con6 nected surface water and groundwater. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
PROMISSORY NOTE


$4,009.00                                                 December 31, 2004
                                                          Newport Beach, CA


     On Demand FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned promises to pay in
lawful money of the United States of America to the order of Cygni
Capital, LLC, nominee or assignee, the sum of FOUR THOUSAND NINE
DOLLARS ($4,009.00), with interest from December 31, 2004 until paid at
the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum.

     Should interest not be paid, it shall thereafter bear interest as
the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed
an amount equal to simple interest on the principal at the maximum
rate permitted by law.  The undersigned hereby waives presentment of
payment, protest, notice of protest, notice of nonpayment, and
diligence in bringing suit, and further agrees, in case suit is
instituted, to collect this Promissory Note or any portion thereof, to
pay such additional sum for attorneys' fees as the Court may adjudge
reasonable in such suit.


                                   MEZZANINE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

                                   By:  /s/ Eric Chess Bronk
                                        Eric Chess Bronk, President
#### VERONICA E. NEUMEISTER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. EASTERN BREWING CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. A. Millard Taylor*for the petitioner.

*Mr. William G. Freeman*for the respondent.

March 26, 1962.
#### Frederick A. Stokes v. Nathaniel P. Jacobs.

Assignments of error are not necessary on common law cerfcioraris.

*Decided June 3d.*

Certiorari to a Circuit Court Commissioner, to review his proceedings on the dissolution of an attachment.

*A. Russell,*for plaintiff in error,

moved for leave to amend the assignment of errors; but

The Court

held that it was unnecessary, as no assignment of errors is required on a common law certiorari.
Before the Third Division,

June 27, 1940

No. 44042.

#### Protests 899772-G, etc., of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles):

*267Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the broken rice in question was held dutiable at five-eighths of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 727 as claimed. *United States*v. *Great Pacific Co.*(23 C. C. P. A. 319, T. D. 48192) followed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-331-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

March 6, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 1, 2007, Florida Gas Transmission 
Company, LLC (FGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 7, to become 
effective April 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25636077666a4b494c4b40765055554a575165434057460b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94d2d1c6d7dbfaf8fdfaf1c7e1e4e4fbe6e0d4f2f1e6f7baf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4393 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Arthur Viola, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of INFe-Human Resources, Inc.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  July 06, 2007  /s/  ARTHUR VIOLA ________________________ Arthur Viola Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIE SAFFORD, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3785

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 14, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
January 2, 1942

No. 46771.

#### Protest 54865-K of Sokol & Co.

Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
Case No. 16,094.

#### UNITED STATES v. FIFTY-ONE DOZEN PIECES OF MERCHANDISE.

[2 Spr. 100.] 1

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Jan., 1864.

Customs Duties —Forfeiture — How Fees Paid out of Proceeds.

At law.

1

 [Reported by John Lathrop, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.]

SPRAGUE, District Judge,

ruled that in eases of sales of property declared forfeit for breach of the revenue laws of the United States, under Act 1799, c. 22, § 90 (1 Stat. 696), the marshal is to pay into the registry of the court the gross proceeds of the sale, less the expenses attending the sale, and that the marshal’s commissions for the sale of property and collecting and paying over the proceeds form part of the expenses so to be deducted, and that all other fees, charges, and expenses, whether of the marshal or any other officer or person, for services not relating to the sale, are to be paid by an order of the court from the proceeds after they are paid into the registry. The practice in prize causes is different, by virtue of the acts of 1862 and 1864. Act 1862, c. 50, § 4 (12 Stat. 375); Act 1864, c. 174, § 8 (13 Stat. 308). In prize sales, the marshal deposits the gross proceeds with the assistant treasurer, subject to the order of the court; and all costs and charges, whether of the sale or otherwise, are paid by order of the court on the assistant treasurer.
No. 54723.

#### Bag Importers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 143939-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 52355.

protests 646865-G, etc. (New York).

#### S. H. Kress *&*Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
Before the Third Division,

December 26, 1941

No. 46744.

#### Protest 47105-K of Firestone Rubber & Latex Products Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the items in question consist of iron drums not having removable heads and that they are similar to those the subject of Abstract 46292. In accordance therewith the drums were held entitled to free entry as claimed.
No. 47416.

#### Protest 50257-K of Howatt Brokerage Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

No testimony was produced in support of the plaintiff’s claim. The attorney for the plaintiff at the hearing set forth his interpretation of the official papers including the invoice and entry and cited in support of plaintiff’s claim Abstract 45375, stating that case had been decided on rehearing. The case, however, has not as yet been decided. *Parodi*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 95, C. D. 436) was also cited but there -was no proof in the record that the merchandise in the instant case is the same as that in the cited case. On the record as presented the protest was overruled for lack of proof of the facts therein alleged, following Abstract 38965.
WALLIN CALHOUN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4658

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed June 12, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

.

Wallin Calhoun, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney

General, Tall ahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, RAY

, and BILBREY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Long-Term Plan for ConcretePavement Research and Technology - The Concrete Pavement Road Map
**v1 ; v2**
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30:0-5052/053
Item Number:0982-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000704225
 
October 9, 2019
 **