alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to June 12, 2018 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :

A

- 17

- 957 Kleinschmit v. Kallhof

A

- 17

- 1225 State v. Almusa

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.
Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c cales/

.
Exh 10.18-Form 10K-12/31/14



EXHIBIT 10.18

COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

Each of our executive officers is employed on an at will basis. The current annual salaries of our executive officers are set forth in the chart below:

	
Executive Officers 
	
Title
	
Salary
	
Incentive Component

	
Robert E. Matthiessen
	
President, CEO and Director
	
$317,242
	
1.5% of consolidated pre-tax profits plus 1.5% of each product segment's pre-tax profits.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
	
Secretary, Treasurer and CFO
	
$224,422
	
Discretionary (1)

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Daniel J. Graham
	
Sr. Vice President, General Manager - Mechanical Products Segment and General Manager-Electrical Products Segment
	
$220,000
	
2.5% of pre-tax profits of the Mechanical Products segment and 2.5% of pre-tax profits of the Electrical Products segment

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
James Pelrin
	
Vice President and General Manager-Thermal Products Segment
	
$220,000
	
2.5% of pre-tax profits of the Thermal Products segment.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Alyn R. Holt
	
Executive Chairman
	
$180,180
	
None

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 





	
(1)
	
Subject to the company having consolidated pre-tax profits and subject to the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer and the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.




Each of the foregoing officers receives our standard benefits package. Messrs. Matthiessen, Regan, Graham and Pelrin are parties to Change of Control Agreements with us that provide for the payment of certain benefits upon the executive's termination of employment following a change of control, as defined therein. 



Directors who are not also our officers (each a "non-employee director") currently receive an annual retainer of $25,000 (Steven J. Abrams, Esq., Joseph W. Dews IV and William Kraut). Non-employee members of the Executive Committee are paid an additional annual retainer of $15,000 (Mssrs. Abrams and Dews) and the Lead Independent Director is paid an additional annual retainer of $10,000 (Mr. Kraut). The chairmen of the committees of the Board are paid an additional annual fee as follows: the Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid an additional annual fee of $20,000 (Mr. Kraut); the Chairman of the Compensation Committee is paid an additional annual fee of $10,000 (Mr. Dews); and the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is paid an additional annual fee of $10,000 (Mr. Abrams).



In addition, directors, executive officers and other key employees may be eligible to receive stock options or restricted stock awards from time to time pursuant to the Company's 2014 Stock Plan and 2007 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.5 and Exhibit 10.6, respectively to this Report).  No awards of restricted stock were made during 2014 to our executive officers, but there was an award of restricted stock made during 2014 to a new director upon his election on April 10, 2014.  There are no agreements obligating the Company to make any such award at any time, so future awards remain at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5006 

To redesignate certain facilities at Paterson Great Falls National Historical 

Park in honor of Congressman Bill Pascrell, Jr. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 

Mr. HELMY (for himself and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To redesignate certain facilities at Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park in honor of Congressman Bill Pascrell, Jr. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF PATERSON GREAT FALLS 

4 NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK FACILITIES. 

5 (a) GREAT FALLS SCENIC OVERLOOK TRAIL

6 BRIDGE.—Great Falls Scenic Overlook Trail Bridge at 

7 Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park shall here8 after be known and designated as ‘‘Congressman Bill Pas9 crell, Jr. Scenic Overlook Trail Bridge’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5006 IS

1 (b) OVERLOOK PARK.—Overlook Park at Paterson 

2 Great Falls National Historical Park shall hereafter be 

3 known and designated as ‘‘Congressman Bill Pascrell, Jr. 

4 Overlook Park’’. 

5 (c) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg6 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

7 States to— 

8 (1) Great Falls Scenic Overlook Trail Bridge 

9 shall be deemed to be a reference to Congressman 

10 Bill Pascrell, Jr. Scenic Overlook Trail Bridge; and 

11 (2) Overlook Park shall be deemed to be a ref12 erence to Congressman Bill Pascrell, Jr. Overlook 

13 Park. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 12, 2014

NO. 03-14-00020-CV

Amber Murray Weisbrod, Appellant

v.

Bobba Lyle Weisbrod, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION --

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

Having reviewed the record, the Court holds that Amber Murray Weisbrod has not prosecuted 

her appeal and did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 10, 2011
    /s/ Heath B. ClarkeHeath B. ClarkeChief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) and Chairman/s/ Kenneth S. CragunKenneth S. CragunChief Financial Officer(principal financial
and accounting officer) and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8232 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8232

To authorize the Secretary of State to withdraw from the United Nations 
Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East Federal 
         funds previously made available to such organization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2024

  Mr. Mast (for himself, Mr. Gottheimer, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. 
Wilson of South Carolina, and Mr. Baird) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of State to withdraw from the United Nations 
Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East Federal 
         funds previously made available to such organization.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF WITHDRAWAL OF FUNDS.

    The Secretary of State shall take such steps as may be necessary to 
expeditiously withdraw or otherwise recover any Federal funds made 
available to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine 
Refugees in the Near East that have not been expended by such Agency as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOEL ANTHONY HOLLEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2708 LKK EFB P

vs.

TOM CAREY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed documents entitled “request for production of documents.” 

Interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admission, responses and proofs of

service thereof “shall not be filed with the clerk until there is a proceeding in which the

document or proof of service is at issue. When required in a proceeding, only that part of the

request and response that is in issue shall be filed.” Local Rules 33-250(c), 34-250(c) & 36-

250(c).

Plaintiff’s August 14, 2006, request for production of documents is stricken and the Clerk

of the Court shall make a notation on the docket to that effect.

So ordered.

Dated: August 29, 2006.

\holl2708.discov not to be filed

Case 2:04-cv-02708-LKK -EFB Document 54 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 1
EXH 32.1

MARKETWATCH, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of
MarketWatch, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 3, 2004
(the "Report"), I, Lawrence S. Kramer, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated therein.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: September 3, 2004

By: /s/ Lawrence S. Kramer    Lawrence S. Kramer, Chief Executive Officer

---
EXHIBIT 5



LOGO



| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                          
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Deloitte & Touche LLPBrookfield Place
181 Bay Street Suite 1400
Toronto ON M5J 2V1 Canada
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Tel: 416-601-6150Fax: 416-601-6151
www.deloitte.ca                                       

Consent of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos. 333-90920, 333-105310 and 333-151733 on Form S-8 and to the use of our reports dated February 15, 2012 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Sun Life Financial Inc. (the Company) and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2011.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Independent Registered Chartered Accountants

Licensed Public Accountants

February 15, 2012

Membre de / Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
# C_2008204EN.01002402.xml

| 9.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/24

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning mergers of public limited liability companies (Codified version)

COM(2008) 26 final — 2008/0009 (COD)

(2008/C 204/06)

On 14 February 2008 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 95 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning mergers of public limited liability companies (codified version)

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning mergers of public limited liability companies (codified version)

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 443rd plenary session of 12 and 13 March 2008 (meeting of 12 March), by 117 votes to 1, with 7 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 12 March 2008.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---
127 STAT. 448 PUBLIC LAW 113–12—JUNE 3, 2013 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 258: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–84 (Comm. on the Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013): 

May 20, considered and passed House. 

May 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–12 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to fraudulent representations 

about having received military decorations or medals. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stolen Valor Act of 2013’’. 

SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 704 of title 18, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘wears,’’; and 

(2) so that subsection (b) reads as follows: 

‘‘(b) FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS.—Whoever, with intent to obtain 

money, property, or other tangible benefit, fraudulently holds oneself out to be a recipient of a decoration or medal described in 

subsection (c)(2) or (d) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned 

not more than one year, or both.’’. 

(b) ADDITION OF CERTAIN OTHER MEDALS.—Section 704(d) of 

title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘If a decoration’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a decoration’’; 

(2) by inserting ‘‘a combat badge,’’ after ‘‘1129 of title 10,’’; 

and 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(2) COMBAT BADGE DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term 

‘combat badge’ means a Combat Infantryman’s Badge, Combat 

Action Badge, Combat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, 

or Combat Action Medal.’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 704 of title 18, United 

States Code, is amended in each of subsections (c)(1) and (d) by 

striking ‘‘or (b)’’. 

Approved June 3, 2013. 

Penalties. 

18 USC 1 note. 

Stolen Valor Act 

of 2013. 

June 3, 2013 

[H.R. 258]
No. 53050.

#### Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 52089-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY MARQUET CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2050 DFL GGH P

vs.

J. WOODFORD,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 25, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-02050-DFL-GGH Document 10 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 25, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim.

DATED: 10/21/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02050-DFL-GGH Document 10 Filed 10/24/05 Page 2 of 2
NO. 07

- 12

- 0435

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

NOVEMBER 7 , 2012

______________________________

NICOLE HICKS

,
Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellees

______________________________

FROM THE 364th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2011

- 429,920; HON. BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD , PRESIDING

_______________________________

**ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND**

_______________________________

Befor e QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE

, J J.

App el lant Nicole Hicks appeals from her conviction for the offense of theft of over

$20,000 but less than $100,000. On November 2 , 2012, the clerk ’ s record was filed.

The report er’s record was due on November 5 , 2 012. On November 5, 2012, the

reporter file d a request for an extension of time to file the record for the reasons that

appellant has not submitted a request for preparation and a written designation for the

record, nor has she paid for the record.2 Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the c auses to the 364th District

Court of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial

court shall determine, via hearing or other reasonable means:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether appell ant is indigent; and, if so,

3. whether the appellant is entitled to a free record or appointed counsel.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessar y to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on tho se matters

(including the name, address, and phone number of any attorney it may appoint to

represent appellant in this appeal) in a supplemental record and cause that record to be

filed with this court by December 7, 2012. Should further time be needed t o perform

these tasks, then same must be requested before December 7, 2012.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CARMAZZI GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Appellee

______________________ 

2022-1231

______________________ 

Appeal from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals in 

Nos. 6265, 6273, 6274, 6275, 6276, 6277, 6278, 6280, 6281, 

6282, 6283, 6288, 6342, 6343, 6344, Administrative Judge 

Erica S. Beardsley, Administrative Judge Harold D. Lester 

Jr., Administrative Judge Joseph A. Vergilio.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

PATRICK BERNARD KERNAN, Whitcomb, Selinsky, PC, 

Denver, CO, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

TIMOTHY TURNER. 

 BORISLAV KUSHNIR, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN 

M. BOYNTON, MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., PATRICIA M.

Case: 22-1231 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 12/28/2022
MCCARTHY; BRANDON DELLAGLIO, DOROTHY M. GUY, TAL 

KEDEM, ALICE SOMERS, Office of the General Counsel, 

United States Social Security Administration, Baltimore, 

MD. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, LOURIE and 

PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

December 28, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 22-1231 Document: 42 Page: 2 Filed: 12/28/2022
No. 49223.

#### Protest 961673-G of Great Lakes Foundry Sand Co. (Rochester).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the Government moved to dismiss the case, contending that the owner’s declarations on customs Form 3347 were not filed with any of the entries and that in two of the entries (1130 and 1140) the actual owner of the merchandise was not on the declaration of the nominal consignee, and that in entry 1253 the owner listed in the declaration of the nominal consignee was the American Nepholine Corporation, rather than the plaintiff. The Government further maintains that statements upon the invoice that the plaintiff purchased or agreed to purchase merchandise do not establish that the plaintiff is the owner at the time of importation, and that it may reasonably be inferred that the plaintiff transferred its interest to someone else prior to importation. Counsel for plaintiff admitted that the Government’s position was well taken as to entry 1253 but pointed out that the consular invoices filed with entries 1130 and 1140 state specifically that the merchandise was “purchased or agreed to be purchased by the Great Lakes Foundry Sand Co., of Detroit, Mich.,” and that an importer or owner of merchandise is entitled to file a protest against assessment of duty on his own importation even though entry was made by his broker without disclosing the name of the importer. The entry papers disclosed that the Great Lakes Foundry Sand Co. was the purchaser of the merchandise except as to entry 1253, in which the entry disclosed that the importer was the American Nepheline Corporation. There was nothing before the court to establish that the plaintiff herein was “the importer, consignee, or agent of the person paying such charge or exaction” as far as entry 1253 is concerned. The Government’s motion to dismiss was therefore granted as to entry 1253, but denied in all other respects. Inasmuch as this court held in C. D. 685, *supra,*that the merchandise covered by the protests and entries therein was entitled to free entry under the provisions of paragraph 1775 the court again, on rehearing, held it free of duty under said paragraph, except as to the merchandise covered by entry 1253. Abstract 40428 (old series) cited as to sufficiency of protest.