alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
      333-130505, 333-129754, 333-114866, 333-97769, 333-66746 and 333-37914) on
      Form
      S-8 of Genius Products, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated April 13,
      2006
      relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appears
      in
      this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Genius Products, Inc. and subsidiaries for
      the year ended December 31, 2006.





/s/
      SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP





Los
      Angeles, California


May
      3,
      2007
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) of TICC Capital
Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|                                                
|/s/ PATRICK F. CONROY                           
|Name: Patrick F. Conroy Date:   November 9, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350),
the undersigned officer of Syscan Imaging, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                     /s/ Darwin Hu
Date:  March 31, 2005
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Darwin Hu, Chairman and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


         This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Jonathan H. CohenName: Jonathan H. Cohen Date: May 5, 2016
#### Thomas Taylor, as Trustee, for St. Lucie Estates Collateral Trust, v. O. Nobles and National Surety Company of New York.

173 So. 908.

Division B.

Opinion Filed April 26, 1937.

Petition for Rehearing Denied May 27, 1937.

*249*Carroll Dunscombe,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Smith & Kanner*and *Loftin, Stokes & Calkins,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the transcript of the record, which has been duly inspected, the Court is of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the judgment brought before us by this writ of error should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Brown, J. J., concur.

Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur specially.

Davis, J.

(concurring).—This suit is against National Surety Corporation as surety on a bond, the obligation of which is not retrospective to a date prior to May 1, 1933. The course of action, it seems to me, is found on matters not within the terms of the bond as written, therefore the Circuit Court properly sustained demurrer. Whether the principal, absent the surety, would be liable for the alleged wrongs, is a matter not before us for consideration in the present case. I concur in affirmance, with the foregoing explanation of my reason for so doing.

Ellis, C. J., and Buford, J., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arch Western Resources, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Robert J. Messey, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Robert J. Messey     Robert J. Messey
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Motorvehicle use map. Colville National Forest, northwest area, Washington**
 
2011 | 2013| 2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28: C 72/8/NORTHW./
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000906190
 
July 2, 2018
No. 52346.

protest 129717-K (San Francisco).

#### Henry W. Peabody & Co. *v.*United States,

*323Opinion by

Cole, J.

The undisputed facts established plaintiff’s claim insofar as it relates to the merchandise imported in ease 156. To such extent the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

November 21, 1960

No. 64918.

#### Geo. S. Bush *& Co.,*Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 329862-K, etc. (Seattle).

*381Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Skyframes, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, James W. France, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      (2)   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
            fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
            results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Skyframes, Inc. and will be
retained by Skyframes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                         /s/ James W. France
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         James W. France
                                         Chief Executive Officer, President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)

November 25, 2003
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00215-CV

Lenny Acevedo, Appellant

v.

Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-15-000869, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant Lenny Acevedo’s application for emergency temporary restraining

order, seeking to stay execution of the writ of possession ordered by the county court at law on

May 1, 2015, is denied. 

It is ordered on May 7, 2015.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland
Case No. 9,071.

#### The MARGARET & JESSE.

[Blatchf. Pr. Cas. 581.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Dec., 1863.

Prize — Blockade.

Vessel and cargo condemned for an attempt to violate the blockade.

In admiralty.

BETTS, District Judge.

The vessel and cargo in the case were captured in about the same locality with the Banshee [Case No. 965], and by the United States vessel Fulton, for the same offense. The máster, in his examination in preparatorio, states that the vessel and cargo were owned by a company or., association residing in Charleston; that she was of English build; that she was laden at Nassau, N. P., and destined for Wilmington, North Carolina; and that the voyage was intended to run the blockade of that port. A large portion of her cargo was thrown overboard by her in the effort to escape the chase of the gunboat which pursued and captured her. There is no essential difference in the great mass of the evidence produced on the hearing. The master testifies that he was employed to break the blockade of Wilmington on this voyage. The first, second, and third mates and the steward corroborate the general evidence of the master, and prove, unequivocally, that the prize was engaged, carrying the Confederate flag, to run the blockade at Wilmington. No appearance is made in this cause for any party, and no defense is found in favor of the vessel, upon the proofs. The prize master found no papers on board the prize, and was told that she had none.

The evidence establishes a clear case of an attempt to violate the blockade of Wilmington, with full knowledge, by all parties concerned in the enterprise of its efficient existence. The vessel and cargo are, consequently, subject to condemnation and forfeiture.
EXHIBIT 13.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of NDS Group plc ("the
registrant") for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rick
Medlock, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.




                                                  By /s/ CRK Medlock
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                         CRK Medlock
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


                                                         Date: 3 December 2003



                                       E-5
Case No. 9,816.

#### MORLOT v. LAWRENCE.

[3 Blatchf. 122.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

Dec., 1853.

Customs Duties — 'Value op Goons — Appraisers’ Valuati in — Time op Export — Time op Purchase.

Where, on an invoice of woollen goods from Paris, the appraisers took, as a guide to their valuation, the market price of the goods in the principal markets of Prance at the period of exportation. and, on their report, the value was raised 10 per cent, and more above the invoice value, and. for that cause, 50 per cent, on the amount of legal duties was added thereto, pursuant to section 17 of the act of August 30th, 1842 (5 Stat. 564), *held,*that under section 16 of the said act the appraisers were required to appraise the goods at their value at the time of purchase, and that the appraisement was void, and that the duties on the increase in valuation, and the penalty, were illegally exacted.

[Cited in U. S. v. Doherty, 27 Fed. 733.)

This was an action brought in the supreme court of New York, to recover back an excess of duties, and a penalty imposed by the defendant [Cornelius W. Lawrence], as collector of the port of New York, on an invoice of fifteen cases of woollen goods, imported by the plaintiff [Charles Morlot). It was removed into this court by certiorari.

The invoice was dated Paris, June 15th, 1845, and the entry was made at the customhouse, July 31st, 1845. On appraisement, the goods were valued at an average of *20%*per cent, above the invoice prices, the appraisers, in valuing the various cases, putting the lowest difference at 10 2/10 per cent., and the highest at 33 Vio per cent. They took the market price of the goods in the principal markets of Prance at the period of exportation to the United States, as a guide to their valuation. On the report of the appraisers, the value was raised 10 per cent, and more above the invoice value, and, for that cause. 50 per cent, on the amount of legal duties was added thereto, pursuant to section 17 of the act of August 30th, 1S42 (5 Stat. 564). Against these charges a protest, with the proper distinctness and precision, was made in writing by the plaintiff, and he now sought to recover back all exacted of him beyond the legal duties on the invoice valuation.

1

 [Reported by Samuel Blatchford, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.)

BETTS, District Judge.

The appraisement was void in law, and did not justify the defendant in imposing and exacting duties on a valuation higner than the invoice valuation, or in levying any additional duties thereto. The appraisers were required, by the 16th section of the act of August 30th, 1842 (5 Stat. 563), to appraise the goods at their value at the time of purchase, and the instructions of the secretary of the treasury did not authorize them to appraise the value at the time of exportation. The illegality having been specifically pointed out to the defendant by the *773protest, he is liable for the exaction made tinder the appraisement.

Judgment for the plaintiff for the sum so paid, (the amount to be adjusted at the custom-house), together with interest.
No. 64197.

protests 59/9052, etc. (Laredo).

#### Chester K. Stoner *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces a meeting of the aforementioned Special Emphasis Panel. 

*Time and Date:*                         1 p.m.-2:30 p.m., May 11, 2007 (Closed).                     

*Place:*                         Teleconference. Corporate Square, Building 8, Conference Room 6B.                     

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463.                     

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of a research application in response to PA PS07-006, “Cooperative Agreement to the Medical Research Council of South Africa for TB Control and HIV Prevention, Care and Treatment Activities.”                     

*For Further Information Contact:*                         J. Felix Rogers, Scientific Review Administrator, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., MS E05, Atlanta, GA 30333, telephone 404.639.6101.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: March 8, 2007. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. E7-4743 Filed 3-14-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<Page>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


[LOGO]

      KPMG LLP
      CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS                             Telephone (416) 228-7000
      Yonge Corporate Centre                            Telefax   (416) 228-7123
      4100 Yonge Street Suite 200                       www.kpmg.ca
      Toronto ON M2P 2H3
      Canada





                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
724 Solutions Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-98837, 333-55760 and 333-42142) on Form S-8 of 724 Solutions Inc. of
our report dated January 21, 2003 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
724 Solutions Inc., as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in
the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of 724 Solutions Inc.



/s/  KPMG LLP


Chartered Accountants
Toronto, Canada
March 4, 2003
#### In the Matter of Gary Malacynski, Petitioner, v H. Carl McCall, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 633]

—Mikoll, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s request for disability retirement benefits.

The discrete issue here is whether substantial evidence supports respondent’s determination that petitioner is not permanently incapacitated from the performance of his duties as a tree pruner.

Petitioner was injured on April 24, 1990 in a work-related motor vehicle accident. On June 28, 1991 he filed an application for accidental disability retirement benefits under Retirement and Social Security Law § 63. The application was considered to be pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 605 since petitioner was a Tier Four member of the Retirement System and not eligible for Retirement and Social Security Law § 63 benefits. The application was initially disapproved on a finding that petitioner is not incapacitated from the performance of his duties. An administrative hearing was held on petitioner’s application and the Hearing Officer held that petitioner failed to prove incapacitation and permanency. The Hearing Officer found petitioner’s testimony not to be credible and further rejected the conclusions reached by petitioner’s medical experts, Russell Cecil and Brian Bilfield, *765in view of their weak and unconvincing nature, accepting rather the medical opinion of the State’s expert, John Dolan, who found no disability. The Hearing Officer concluded that medical opinions offered by petitioner to sustain his claim were based solely on petitioner’s subjective complaints, which he rejected, and that petitioner’s claim must be rejected absent any objective findings to support it. The Hearing Officer noted, in reaching his decision, that all medical experts indicated that petitioner had a preexisting medical condition not caused by the accident.

Petitioner must establish that he sustained a permanent injury that prevents him from performing his job *{see, Matter of Rossiello v Regan,*203 AD2d 868). It is the Hearing Officer’s prerogative to determine which testimony to credit, if any *{see, Matter of Longendyke v Regan,*195 AD2d 695). A review of the record reveals that the administrative determination is supported by substantial evidence and should be upheld. We reject petitioner’s contentions of error as to respondent’s failure to personally sign the determination, first raised on appeal, as improperly raised and, therefore, not necessitating our consideration *{see, Matter of Kenner v Coughlin,*105 AD2d 1130, 1131, *Iv denied, Iv dismissed*65 NY2d 603, 760). If we were to consider it, we would find it without merit *{see,*Retirement and Social Security Law § 74 [b]).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.