alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1809

_____________________________

JACKIE DOVE, as trustee of the 

Jackie Dove Living Trust, U/T/D

August 21, 2015, HERBERT C.

MANTOOTH and JANET M.

MANTOOTH,

Petitioners,

v.

WILLIAM T. LAND, RAMONA LAND 

and CITY COUNCIL for the City of 

Live Oak, Florida,

Respondents.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

March 27, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition is denied on the merits.

WOLF, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

George T. Reeves of Davis, Schnitker, Reeves & Browning, P.A., 

Madison, for Petitioners.

John Joseph Joyce of Robinson, Kennon & Kendron, P.A., Lake 

City, for Respondents William T. Land and Ramona Land.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAXIMILIANO MENDEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2447 LKK DAD P

vs.

DR. CRAPOTTA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has submitted a letter in which he states that prison officials confiscated

his ink pens on October 7, 2005, and provided him with pencils and “only one pen, almost

empty.” Plaintiff cites the court’s requirement that documents be typed or printed legibly in ink

for scanning purposes, asserts that his access to the court is being denied or obstructed by the

confiscation of his ink pens, and requests the court’s assistance “as legally appropriate.”

Plaintiff has not demonstrated that court intervention is required or appropriate. 

The court was able to scan plaintiff’s letter, which was submitted in pencil. Plaintiff will be

permitted to submit subsequent documents printed legibly in pencil when ink is not available. 

The court will grant plaintiff a final extension of time to file his opposition to defendants’ July 5,

2005 motion to dismiss, as set forth below.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02447-LKK -DAD Document 25 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s October 21, 2005 request for court assistance is granted in part;

2. Plaintiff is granted leave to submit documents legibly printed in pencil when

ink is not available; and

3. Plaintiff’s opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be filed and served

within fifteen days from the date of this order; defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed within

fifteen days after plaintiff’s opposition is served.

DATED: October 27, 2005.

DAD:13

mend2447.36t

Case 2:04-cv-02447-LKK -DAD Document 25 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Universal Food & Beverage Company and subsidiaries (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, John F. Levy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 30, 2006 |  | /s/ John F. Levy       
|               |  | Name: John F. Levy     
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by Universal Food & Beverage Company and will be retained by Universal Food & Beverage Company and furnished
to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 46742.

#### Protests 878886-G, etc., of General Printing Ink Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists Of honing stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 36742, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1692 was sustained.
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to March 13, 2018 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### A

- 17

- 650 Goodwin v. Goodwin

A

- 17

- 883 In re Interest of Michael M.

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.
Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c ca les/

.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of IceWEB, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
      for the year ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report"), I, John R. Signorello, CEO of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.











/s/
                John R. SignorelloJohn
                R. Signorello,CEO
                and principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting
                officerFebruary
                7, 2007





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
No. 48561.

#### Protest 822261-G of Leghorn Trading Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the shipment contained 75 drums of commercial olive oil, not edible, which were marked “Product of Es-pañol,” and the importer was required by the collector to mark them “Spain” before they were released. Following Abstract 39754 the protest was overruled' as the merchandise was found not to have been legally marked in legible English words.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report of IceWEB, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the Year ending September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, John R. Signorello, Principal Executive Officer and the Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Yearly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Yearly Report fully presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                        By: /s/ John R. Signorello
                                            -------------------------------
                                            John R. Signorello
                                            Principal Executive Officer and
                                            Principal Financial Officer
                                            January 14, 2003
Via Electronic Mail and Certified Mail

April 24, 2013

Jeff Morris

Deputy Director for Programs

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

US Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20460

Re: Response to April 17, 2013 EPA Memorandum – Siloxane Enforceable Consent Agreement

Dear Jeff:

SEHSC is in receipt of the April 17, 2013 memorandum from Jeff Morris, Deputy Director for Programs, 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency), which 

we understand represents EPA’s response to the revised environmental monitoring enforceable consent 

agreement (ECA) proposal for D4 that SEHSC submitted to the EPA on February 19, 2013. 

From the beginning of and throughout the ECA negotiations, EPA has consistently communicated that the 

purpose of a proposed environmental monitoring program was to support an environmental risk 

assessment for D4. To facilitate development of the assessment, EPA expressed a desire to develop a 

better understanding of the sources of, and pathways to, the environmental concentrations of D4 in 

environmental media and biota associated with industrial releases from manufacturing, processing, 

formulation and high volume industrial or commercial end users of D4. This has been articulated, to a 

greater or lesser degree, in all of EPA’s written correspondence in response to the monitoring proposals 

that have been submitted by SEHSC to the Agency. 

Consequently, SEHSC is disappointed the Agency continues to insist on the collection of data for the 

ECA that will not improve the scientific veracity of an ecological risk assessment for D4. In particular, 

influent and bio-solids monitoring at direct discharge sites, and monitoring at indirect discharge industrial 

sites is not necessary for an informed assessment of environmental exposure to D4. The revised ECA 

proposal submitted by SEHSC on February 19, 2013 (and discussed during the March 28, 2013 

negotiation meeting) will provide a robust dataset for assessing the risks, if any, associated with 

environmental exposure to D4. 

SEHSC members remain committed to a monitoring proposal that is responsive to the Agency’s desire to 

develop an environmental risk assessment for D4. There are many points provided in your letter that can 

and should be discussed further and we look forward to continuing to work with the Agency to finalize the 

proposed environmental monitoring ECA for D4.

Sincerely,

Karluss Thomas

SEHSC Executive Director
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10305-10306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Enhanced-Use Lease Development of Property at the Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Dayton, OH

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice of intent to enter into an enhanced-use lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
intends to enter into an enhanced-use lease of approximately 0.6 acres 
of land and an existing building (Building No. 402) at the VA Medical 
Center in Dayton, Ohio. The lease would have an initial term of 65 
years, and an option to extend such term for 10 additional years. In 
exchange for and as consideration under the lease, the selected lessee 
would be required to

[[Page 10306]]

develop, finance, renovate, construct, manage, maintain, and operate 
the building as a facility comprised of not less than 27 units, and 
provide transitional housing and supportive services to homeless 
individuals within the community. Such housing and supportive services 
would be provided by the lessee to veterans on a priority basis. As 
further consideration, VA would receive an annual rent of $5,000 
(subject to yearly increases per a HUD fair market rent escalator) plus 
additional in-kind consideration, such as case management and 
counseling services, from the lessee during the lease term.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Sexton, Office of Asset 
Enterprise Management (004B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-9470.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 38 U.S.C. 8161, et seq. states that 
the Secretary may enter into an enhanced-use lease if he determines 
that the implementation of a business plan proposed by the Under 
Secretary for Health for applying the consideration under such a lease 
to the provision of medical care and services would result in a 
demonstrable improvement of services to eligible veterans in the 
geographic service-delivery area within which the property is located. 
This project meets this requirement.

    Approved: February 27, 2007.
R. James Nicholson,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. E7-4015 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
No. 61910.

#### United China *&*Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protest 316236-K/15025 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the articles described as earthenware butter dishes, item 4436, and decorated earthenware cheese dishes, item 2510, in cases 8575 and 8862 to 8866, constitute entireties, consisting of dish and cover, and are decorated earthenware tableware, valued at $2 or more per dozen, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 8561)

#### Beesemyer-Ridnour Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 15154.

(Decided March 16, 1956)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General *(Joseph E. Weil,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Eicwall, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement presents the question of the proper value of certain skinless and boneless sardines in olive oil. At the hearing, it was stipulated that the merchandise was freely offered for sale in the ordinary course of trade, in the usual wholesale quantities, in the principal market of the country of exportation, on the date of exportation at the entered value, which I understand to be the export value.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is the entered value.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clifton Savings Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.



                               /s/ John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


                               /s/ Christine R. Piano
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Christine R. Piano
                               Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


August 8, 2005
#### HENRY JANEK, PETITIONER-PETITIONER, v. FEDERAL PACIFIC ELECTRIC CO., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

*Mr. Henry Janelc, in propria persona.*

*Mr. Isidor Kalisch*for the respondent.

April 30, 1962.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Sam Messina, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual  Report of
Viastar  Media  Corporation  on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2004 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB/A fairly  presents in all material  respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Viastar Media Corporation


Dated:   September 13, 2005              By: /s/ Sam Messina
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Sam Messina
                                                 Interim Chief Financial Officer



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Viastar Media Corporation and will be retained by Viastar Media
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# PD&R Edge

**FEATURED                                    JCHS State of the Nation's Housing Report**

**FROM PD&R                                            LEADERSHIP**3D Printing as an Affordable Housing Solution in Alaska

**IN PRACTICE**Developing Affordable Housing for a Diverse Population in Hillsboro, Oregon

**INTERNATIONAL & PHILANTHROPIC SPOTLIGHT**Pursuing Sustainable and Equitable Development at the United Nations

**TRENDING**The University of Arkansas at Little Rock Partners With Neighbors to Improve the District 

 

 

**
Strong Economic Conditions and Balanced Housing Market Conditions in the Fort Wayne HMA
**
**
Medicare Advantage Coverage Among Individuals Receiving Federal Housing Assistance  
**
**
Moving on to 51  
**

Most Viewed Articles
UPMC Health Plan Collaborates to Address Housing as a Social Determinant of Health

 

Supporting Innovation for Sustainability in Affordable Housing

 
 
Vienna's Unique Social Housing Program

Rental Burdens: Rethinking Affordability Measures

 

 

Contact HUD User

Subscribe to Email Alerts

Download Apps

*The contents on these pages are the views of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the U.S. Government.*
             About PD&R PD&R MissionOrganization ChartPD&R EventsPD&R Guidelines &                    BrochuresHUD Secretary's AwardsDisclaimer of Liability and                    EndorsementReferenceContact UsFirst Time VisitorHUD User eBookstoreHUD User ArchivesWebstoreResearchCase StudiesDatasetsPeriodicalsRegulatory Barriers ClearinghouseResearch & Reports
***Note:*** Guidance documents, except when based on statutory or                regulatory authority or law, do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the                public in any way. Guidance documents are intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding                existing requirements under the law or agency policies.

Accessibility                |                Contact Info |                Privacy                    Policy |                FOIA |                Web Management and Web Policies |                Inspector General |                No Fear Act |                PaymentAccuracy.gov
**HUD USER**                P.O. Box 23268, Washington, DC 20026-3268 **Toll Free:** 1-800-245-2691    **TDD:**1-800-927-7589                **Local:** 1-703-964-0670    **Fax:** 1-202-708-9981
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Osborne Broadie, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 517]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered November 4, 1991, convicting *353him of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the trial court’s refusal to charge criminally negligent homicide *(see,*Penal Law § 125.10) as a lesser-included offense of murder in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 125.25 [1]) is foreclosed due to the jury’s verdict finding him guilty of murder in the second degree, the crime alleged in the indictment, and its implicit rejection of the charged lesser-included offenses of first and second degree manslaughter *(see, People v Richette,*33 NY2d 42; *People v Cruz,*191 AD2d 507; *People v Rammelkamp,*167 AD2d 560).

The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor’s summation improperly tended to shift the burden of proof to the defense is not preserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Balls,*69 NY2d 641). In any event, the remarks did not improperly shift the burden of proof *(see, People v Thomas,*186 AD2d 602).

Finally, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 8 -00 442 -CV In r e He alt hy I nnov at ion s, Inc . a nd K e vin C. Se r afini ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M TRAVIS COUNTY M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Th e Mo tio n o f Re lator s He a lthy Inn ov a tio ns , Inc . and Ke vin C. Se ra fi ni to D ism iss Petition for Writ of Manda mus is gra

nted. This petition is di smissed.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Filed: June 25, 2009