alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James A. Yost, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HLI OperatingCompany, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
/s/ JAMES A. YOST
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350),
the undersigned officer of Syscan Imaging, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2005 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                     /s/ William Hawkins
Date:  April 17, 2006                --------------------
                                     William Hawkins,
                                     Acting Chief Financial Officer,
                                     Chief Operating Officer and Secretary


         This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0586. FRANCISCO YOVANNY ARGUETA v. THE STATE.

In January 2019, Francisco Yovanny Argueta pled guilty to two counts of

aggravated child molestation and four counts of child molestation. In June 2021, he

filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea.1 On July 1, 2021, the trial court entered an

order denying the motion.2 On September 13, 2021, Johnson filed a notice of appeal

stating that he had not received the order on his motion until August 16, 2021. We,

however, lack jurisdiction. 

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or trial

court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing

of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. 

Redford v. State, 357 Ga. App. 247, 250 (850 SE2d 447) (2020). Argueta’s notice of

appeal was filed 74 days after entry of the trial court’s order denying his motion.

Thus, this appeal is untimely and is therefore DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

See id.; Hill-Blount v. State, 336 Ga. App. 633, 634-635 (2) (785 SE2d 309) (2016). 

To the extent that the trial court may have frustrated Argueta’s ability to seek

appellate review by failing to notify him of its order in a timely manner, Argueta’s

remedy is to petition the trial court to vacate and re-enter the order under OCGA § 9-

11-60 (g). See Cambron v. Canal Ins. Co., 246 Ga. 147, 148-149 (1) (269 SE2d 426)

1 Argueta also filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal, but the record does not

show that the trial court ruled on the motion. 

2 The order is entitled “Order Denying Defendant’s Pro Se Motion toWithdraw

Guilty Plea,” but the court actually dismissed the motion.

December 20, 2021
(1980), disapproved in part by Wright v. Young, 297 Ga. 683, 684 n.3 (777 SE2d 475)

(2015). If the order is vacated and re-entered, Argueta would be required to file a

notice of appeal within 30 days from the date of re-entry. Id. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/20/2021
Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



(Section 302 Certification)



I, Thomas E. Vessey, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of 1st Centennial Bancorp;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2005                 
|                                     
|/s/ Thomas E. Vessey                 
|Thomas E. Vessey,                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.5(a) 

SCHEDULE OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS WHO HAVE ENTERED INTO INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS 

(as of March 13, 2015)

 

 


	
NAME
	
  
	
POSITION

	
Lee K. Barba
	
  
	
Director

	
Michael S. Egan
	
  
	
Chief Executive Officer

	
Gregory J. Franchina
	
  
	
Chief Information Officer

	
Ian V. Jacobs
	
 
	
Director

	
John H. Lewis 
	
  
	
Director

	
Jonathan R. Mather
	
  
	
Director

	
Michael J. McConnell
	
 
	
Chairman of the Board of Directors

	
Robert W. O’Hare
	
  
	
Chief Financial Officer

	
Walter L. Turek
	
 
	
Director
No. 46766.

#### Protest 66584-K of L. A. Guido (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff and the case was submitted. There being no sample or other evidence in support of the claim made, the protest was overruled.
Figure 8-1. Annual 2002-2004 CMAQ derived annual average fraction of ambient concentrations (above) 

and deposition (below) of individual NOy species delineated by the Adirondack and Shenandoah case 

study areas and the remainder of the Eastern U.S. domain (Figure update 10/4/10).
THIS AGREEMENT dated as of the 28th day of December, 2002 is

BETWEEN:

Sun Power Corporation 
(the 'Company') a company incorporated in the State of Nevada with an office located hose head office is located 112c Longview Drive, Los Alamos, NM 87544.
**Roland Vetter 
(the 'Consultant') resident at #113 - 980 West 1
st
 Street, North Vancouver, B.C., V7P 1C5.
**WHEREAS:**
The Company has signed an option to acquire certain mining property(s) in Mexico (the 'Property') and wishes to retain the services of the Consultant to assist it in its evaluation of the Property;
**IT IS NOW HEREBY AGREED THAT:
- The Consultant will provide consultancy services to the Company from the date of this Agreement (the 'Term').
- The duties of the Consultant during the Term will be:
Assisting Robyn Storer in reporting to the Company on the economic viability of operating the mine, ore reserves, the mine expansion plan and the availability of contracts with smelters to process the ore produced.
Assisting the officers of the Company in preparing financial modeling and presentations to existing and prospective investors in the Company.

- The Company will pay the Consultant:
a fee of US$20,000 in shares of common stock of the Company valued at a price of US$0.25 per share.
all reasonable out of pocket expenses incurred in the carrying out your duties as consultant in evaluating the Property.
Such payments will be made to the Consultant on submission of an appropriate invoice.

- The Consultant agrees to keep confidential all information provided about the Property and the Company and not to pass on such information to third parties without the prior written consent of an officer of the Company. This restriction will not apply to:
Information that is or becomes public;
When the Consultant is obliged to disclose information about the Company or the Property by legal or regulatory authorities.

- This Agreement is subject to the Laws of the State of Nevada.
**AGREED TO:**
/s/ Andrew Schwab****
# C_2007074EN.01001001.xml

| 31.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/10

---

Notification of a request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and the Council — deadline extension

Request from a Member State

(2007/C 74/07)

On 9 February 2007 the Commission received a request under Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

1

The request, from the Republic of Finland, concerns postal services and other services as referred to in Article 6(2)(b) and (c) of Directive 2004/17/EC in that country. A notification of the request was published in OJ C 47, 1.3.2007,p. 13. The initial deadline was 12 May 2007.

In accordance with the second sentence of Article 30(6), since the Commission needs to obtain and examine additional information, the period within which the Commission must take a decision on this request has been extended by three months.

The final deadline is therefore 12 August 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Council Directive 2006/97/EC (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 107).

1

---
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June30, 2019 (the “Report”) of Oxford Square Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce L. Rubin, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Bruce L. RubinName: Bruce L. RubinDate:July31, 2019
Order entered March 26, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00074-CR

RAYFORD HIGH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-57938-Y

ORDER

Appellant’s March 23, 2015 motion for extension of time and motion to compel the filing 

of the reporter’s record is GRANTED to the extent we ORDER court reporter Catherine 

Vecchio to file, within THIRTY days of the date of this order, a supplemental reporter’s record 

of the October 23, 2014 hearing on appellant’s amended motion to reconsider the motion to 

suppress. In the event no notes are available regarding the requested supplemental reporter’s 

record, Catherine Vecchio is ORDERED to file a letter stating that the requested supplemental 

reporter’s record cannot be filed. 

We EXTEND the time to file appellant’s amended brief until SIXTY days from the date 

of this order. We EXTEND the time to file the State’s brief until NINETY days from the date 

of this order. 
WE DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to court reporter 

Catherine Vecchio; The Honorable Elizabeth Frizzell, presiding judge, Criminal District Court 

No. 7; and counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Acevedo, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 822]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), rendered November 9, 1992, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We disagree with the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his constitutional right to testify on his own behalf because he did not waive this right on the record *(see, People v Fratta,*83 NY2d 771; *People v Fagan,*203 AD2d 933; *People v Richardson,*203 AD2d 932).

A photograph of the scene where the defendant shot the victim was properly admitted into evidence even though a portion of the photograph contained a bloodied sidewalk. Photographs are admissible if they tend to prove or disprove a disputed or material issue, to illustrate or elucidate other relevant evidence, or to corroborate or disprove some other evidence offered or to be offered. They should be excluded only if their sole purpose is to arouse the emotions of the jury and to prejudice the defendant *(see, People v Wood,*79 NY2d 958, 960; *People v Pobliner,*32 NY2d 356, 370, *cert denied*416 US 905). Here, the photograph showed the scene where the shooting occurred and corroborated the testimony of witnesses whose credibility had been challenged. Thus, the photograph was properly admitted *(see, People v Wood, supra; People v Pobliner, supra; People v Cruz,*176 AD2d 953).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his *pro se*supplemental brief, are either without merit *551or unpreserved for appellate review. Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Exchange Act , Company
 1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2010, to which this Certification is
attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 In Witness Whereof
 /s/ Philip E. Soran
    
    
    
    /s/ John R. JuddPhilip E. Soran 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    John R. Judd 
Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
JUDGMENT
No. 04

- 13

- 00308

- CV
LAREDO MEDICAL CENTER , Dr. Fermin Romero

- Arreloa M.D., J. Claudio R.N., and Laredo Medical Center Vein Center assumed name Laredo Texas Hospital Co. L.P., Appellants

v.
Isza MELENDEZ , Appellee From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CVT001771D1 The Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding
BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI , JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion o f this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Appellee Isza Melendez recover her costs of this appeal from Appellants Laredo Medical C enter , Dr. Fermin Romero

- Arreloa M

. D

. , J. Claudio R

. N

. , and Laredo Medical Center Vein Center assum ed name Laredo Texas Hospital Co., L

. P

. SIGNED December 4, 2013.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROL ROYE, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2192 DFL KJM PS

vs.

FAIR ISAAC AND COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On October 27, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No

objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02192-DFL -KJM Document 37 Filed 01/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 27, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant Landsafe’s motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. All defendants except for defendant Providian National Bank are dismissed. 

DATED: 1/26/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02192-DFL -KJM Document 37 Filed 01/27/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 76-6212.

#### Price *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<SEQUENCE>2
<FILENAME>ims20065consentex23-1.txt

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

                                   ----------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8, SEC File No. 333-140437, of International Monetary
Systems, Ltd. and the related prospectuses of our audit report dated March 29,
2007 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2006 and
2005 and the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
cash flows of International Monetary Systems, Ltd. and its subsidiaries for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 appearing in the Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2006.


WEBB & COMPANY, P.A.
Certified Public Accountants

March 31, 2007