alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007120EN.01000701.xml

| 31.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/7

---

Communication of the Commission on the quantity of certain products in the milk and milk products sector available for the second half of 2007 under certain quotas opened by the Community

(2007/C 120/05)

When import licences were allocated for the first half of 2007 for certain quotas referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 (1), applications for licences covered quantities less than those available for the products concerned. As a result, the quantity available for each quota for the period 1 July to 31 December 2007 should be calculated, taking account of the unallocated quantities resulting from Commission Regulation (EC) No 52/2007 (of 23 January 2007 determining the extent to which the applications for import licences submitted in January 2007 for certain dairy products under certain tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 can be accepted (2)) and from Commission Regulation (EC) No 56/2007 (of 24 January 2007 determining the extent to which the applications for import licences lodged during the first 15 days of January 2007 for butter originating in New Zealand under quota numbers 09.4195 and 09.4182 can be accepted (3)).

1

2

3

The quantities available for the period 1 July to 31 December 2007 for the second half of the year of importation of certain quotas referred to in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 are indicated hereunder.

---

(1)  OJ L 341, 22.12.2001, p. 29. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 487/2007 (OJ L 114, 1.5.2007, p. 8).

1

(2)  OJ L 17, 24.1.2007, p. 5.

2

(3)  OJ L 18, 25.1.2007, p. 8.

3

---

ANNEX I.C

| Products originating in ACP countries |
| --- |
| Quota number | Quantity (t) |
| 09.4026 | 1 000 |
| 09.4027 | 1 000 |

Products originating in ACP countries

Quota number

Quantity (t)

09.4026

1 000

09.4027

1 000

---

ANNEX I.D

| Products originating in Turkey |
| --- |
| Quota number | Quantity (t) |
| 09.4101 | 2 300 |

Products originating in Turkey

Quota number

Quantity (t)

09.4101

2 300

---

ANNEX I.E

| Products originating in South Africa |
| --- |
| Quota number | Quantity (t) |
| 09.4151 | 6 750 |

Products originating in South Africa

Quota number

Quantity (t)

09.4151

6 750

---

ANNEX III.A

| Butter originating in New Zealand |
| --- |
| Quota number | Quantity (t) |
| 09.4195 | 19 156 |
| 09.4182 | 20 640 |

Butter originating in New Zealand

Quota number

Quantity (t)

09.4195

19 156

09.4182

20 640

---
No. 52047.

#### Altshul Stern & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 118593-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated'herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Opinion filed April 11, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-13-00062-CR

_________

JESUS JOSE MUNIZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 358th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-36,766

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Jesus Jose Muniz has filed in this court a motion to withdraw his notice of appeal and 

dismiss his appeal. Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2, the motion is signed by both Appellant and 

his counsel. Additionally, Appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. Appellant’s notice of appeal is withdrawn, 

and the appeal is dismissed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is dismissed as moot.

April 11, 2013 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of 
Columbia)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted in Raleigh, NC. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting 
public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service 
at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, April 25, Thursday, April 
26, and Friday, April 27, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inez E. De Jesus at 1-888-912-1227 
(toll-free), or 954-423-7977 (non toll-free).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, April 25, 2007 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. ET, Thursday, April 26, 
2007 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. and from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. ET and Friday, 
April 27, 2007 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. ET. For information or to confirm 
attendance, notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made 
with Inez De Jesus. Ms. De Jesus may be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7977, or write Inez E. De Jesus, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine 
Island Rd., Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the 
Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 12, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E7-4967 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety, Appellant *v.*R. Michael Griffith and Robert U. Griffith, t/d/b/a Lititz Chevron Service Station, Appellees.

Argued February 5, 1981,

before Judges Mencer, Rogers and Craig, sitting as a panel of three.

*51
      *Harold H. Cramer,*Assistant Attorney General, with him, *John M. . Hrubovcak,*Assistant Attorney General, *Ward T. Williams,*Chief Counsel, Transportation, and *Edward G. Biester, Jr.,*Attorney General, for appellant.

*William E. Haggerty, Morgan, Hallgren*& *Heinly, P.C.,*for appellees.

March 20, 1981:

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

The Department of Transportation suspended the Certification as an Official Inspection Mechanic of R. Michael Griffith and the Certificate of Appointment of Robert J. Griffith, trading and doing business as Lititz Chevron Service Station, for a period of 3 months. These suspensions followed an inspection, on May 9, 1979, of a 1965 Plymouth sedan by Trooper Kelly of the Pennsylvania State Police. The same car had been inspected by R. Michael Griffith on February 7, 1979, without his finding the defects disclosed by Trooper Kelly’s inspection.

The suspensions were appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County. Following a hearing, that court sustained the appeals, reversed the suspension orders, and directed the Department of Transportation to reinstate the Certificate of Appointment of Robert J. Griffith and the Certification as an Official Inspection Mechanic of R. Michael Griffith. A motion for reconsideration was filed by the Department of Transportation and was dismissed by the court below. The Department of Transportation then filed an appeal to this Court.

After an examination of the record, we affirm the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County reversing the suspensions by the Department of Transportation and directing the reinstatements set forth therein, on the opinion of the Honorable D. *52Richard Eckman, filed and docketed at Trust Book 45, page 264, in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County.

Order

And Now, this 20th day of March, 1981, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, dated December 4, 1979, sustaining the appeals of Robert J. Griffith and R. Michael Griffith and directing the Department of Transportation to reinstate the Certificate of Appointment of Robert J. Griffith permitting him to operate as an Official Inspection Station and the Certification as an Official Inspection Mechanic of R. Michael Griffith, is hereby affirmed.
---

---

# Exhibit 4 (a).26



# The State of Israel
Ministry of
Communications

# General License for
Partner Communications Ltd. for the Provision of
Mobile Radio Telephone
(MRT) Services using the Cellular Method

# Amendment No. 49

By virtue of the powers of the
Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the Communications Law
(Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, that have been delegated to us, by all our
other powers under any law and after having given Partner Communications Company
Ltd. (hereinafter: Partner) the opportunity to present their
arguments regarding this matter, we hereby amend the General License for the provision of
mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the cellular method granted to Partner on 7
April 1998, as follows:

# Amendment of Article 75

| | 1. | In
Article 75.8 of the License,
| | -- | -------------------------------

| | a. | Sub-section
(b)(4) shall be deleted;
| | -- | ------------------------------------

| | b. | After
sub-section (b) shall come:
| | -- | ---------------------------------

| | (c) | The Licensee may charge a subscriber, that intitates a charged call for services or for
the following access codes, a charge that does not exceed the tariff the Licensee charges
the subscriber for a call to a fixed line network:
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (1) | Partially
toll free service calls1
| | --- | ----------------------------------

| | (2) | Business
speed dial service2";
| | --- | ------------------------------

(25 December 2008)

| | (sgd)

Mordechai MordechaiDirector-General |  | (sgd)

Haim Giron, Adv.Senior Deputy Director-General,Engineering and Licensing | 
| | -------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

---

|1 In
accordance witht eh service file partially toll free calls (1-700
          service).
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2 In
accordance with the directors provisions speed dial for
          businesses-star and four digits, dated 4 May 2008.



---

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 499 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 499

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to 
 reauthorize the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debbie Smith Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 2(j) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 
(34 U.S.C. 40701(j)) is amended by striking ``through 2024'' and 
inserting ``through 2029''.

SEC. 3. AUDITS TO PROTECT INTEGRITY OF GRANT AWARDS.

    Section 2(c)(4) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 
(34 U.S.C. 40701(c)(4)) is amended by striking ``2022'' and inserting 
``2029''.

            Passed the Senate November 2, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 499

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to 
 reauthorize the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
Before the First Division,

March 18, 1952

No. 56476.

protests 176748-K, etc. (New York).

#### Associated Merchandising Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 53045.

#### Rhode Island Lace Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 111393-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. *D. 239),*the protests were dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce L. Rubin, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Bruce L. RubinName: Bruce L. Rubin Date: November 9, 2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5722] 

*Summary:*                     Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Ike Taiga and Tokuyama Gyokuran: Japanese Masters of the Brush”, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from on or about May 1, 2007, until on or about July 22, 2007, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*For Further Information Contact:*                     For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.                

Dated: March 5, 2007. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

 [FR Doc. E7-4661 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6045

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JIMMY R. DEAN, a/k/a Jimmy Richard Dean,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cr-00479-CMC-1; 

3:17-cv-01908-CMC)

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy R. Dean, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States 

Attorney, James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy R. Dean seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing as untimely his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders 

are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies 

relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of 

a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dean has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
446 A.2d 701

#### Commonwealth v. Hunsinger, Appellant.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied Sept. 13, 1982.

Argued March 9, 1982.

James F. Geddes, for appellant; Joseph C. Giebus, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WICKERSHAM, CIRILLO and LIPEZ, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
## Schmeltz, Rachel

From: Schmeltz, Rachel 

### Sent: To: Monday, October 19, 2015 4:38 PM 'Szabo, Aaron' 

### Subject: RE: Burden estimate for 2015 GHGRP Revisions

It'sabout a $200,000 reduction to subsequent year costs. Not huge, but not nothing. Yes, please letthe reviewers know. We will make the necessary revisions to the memo and the preamble and indicate as such in the redline that gets posted to the docket. Thanks! Rachel

From :Szabo, Aaron [mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov] 

### Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 4:05 PM To: Schmeltz, Rachel 

### Subject: RE: Burden estimate for 2015 GHGRP Revisions Rachel, Assuming that these are not significant changes to the burden estimate, I do not believe that you need to send the revised version yet. I will let the reviewers know ofthis change to the impacts. Thank you very much.

From : Schmeltz, Rachel [mailto:Schmeltz.Rachel@epa.gov] 

### Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 12:17 PM To: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron L Szabo@omb.eop.gov> 

### Subject: Burden estimate for 2015 GHGRP Revisions
Hi Aaron, We are working on some edits to the impacts memo for the 2015 Revisions proposal. In a recent QA, we found some errors in the numbers. Some ofthe first costs were mistakenly carried overto subsequent years. The edits would slightly reduce the burden forcoal mine reporters. Shou ld we send over a revised version when it is ready or are you OK with the version you have? Thanks! Rachel

Rachel Schmeltz U.S. Environmental Protection Agency schmeltz.rachel@epa.gov Phone: 202-343-9124 Telework on most Fridays Alternate phone numberfor telework days: 301-252-8060.

1
No. 61903.

#### Modernophone, Inc., and H. S. Dorf & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 310879-K (New York).

*544Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper coverings containing phonograph records the subject of *United States*v. *Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division*(41 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 541), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: March 30, 2011 Meeting with Rubber Manufacturers Association on the 2011 

NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

 

On March 30, 2011, EPA met with members of the Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA) to 

discuss their issues and concerns with the final rule entitled, “Identification of Non-Hazardous 

Secondary Materials That are Solid Waste,” which was published in the Federal Register on 

March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15456). This is referred to as the 2011 NHSM Final Rule. 

During that meeting, Tracey Norberg of RMA expressed concerns with the rule implementation 

with to regard to off-specification scrap tires that are never placed on vehicles. 

Expected Meeting Attendees:

Tracey Norberg, RMA 

Jim Berlow, EPA 

George Faison, EPA 

Michael Galbraith, EPA 

Tab Tesnau, EPA 

Marc Thomas, EPA
446 A.2d 695

#### Fiorini v. Hahn Furniture Co. et al., Appellants.

Submitted September 30, 1981.

John S. Sherry, for appellant; Leonard A. DeJulio, for Fiorini, appellee; Robert A. Arcovio, for Centurion Eastern Division of Rosalco, appellee.

Before CAVANAUGH, MONTEMURO and VAN der VOORT, JJ.

Affirmed.
Before the Third Division,

December 5, 1946

No. 51457.

#### Petition 6373-R of Milnor, Inc. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was established that the price paid for the pearls was the invoice price, less a 12 percent discount which was inadvertently omitted from the invoice. The importer previous to entry made full disclosure to the customs officials and received their approval of a reduction of 12 percent *230on entry. From the evidence presented it was held that the petitioner was without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.