alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________
No. 01-40168

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CRUZ PERALTA-SOTO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-416-1

August 24, 2001

Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defende r, appoi nted to represent Cruz Peral ta-Soto (“Peral ta”), has

requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Peralata has not filed a response to counsel’s motion to wit hdraw. Our-2-

independent revie w of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRAN TED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
```

[113th Congress Public Law 12]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 127 STAT. 448]]

Public Law 113-12
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to fraudulent 
     representations about having received military decorations or 
              medals. <<NOTE: June 3, 2013 -  [H.R. 258]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Stolen Valor Act 
of 2013.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 18 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stolen Valor Act of 2013''.
SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT OF MILITARY 
                    DECORATIONS OR MEDALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``wears,''; and
            (2) so that subsection (b) reads as follows:

    ``(b) Fraudulent Representations About Receipt of Military 
Decorations or Medals. <<NOTE: Penalties.>> --Whoever, with intent to 
obtain money, property, or other tangible benefit, fraudulently holds 
oneself out to be a recipient of a decoration or medal described in 
subsection (c)(2) or (d) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not 
more than one year, or both.''.

    (b) Addition of Certain Other Medals.--Section 704(d) of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``If a decoration'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--If a decoration'';
            (2) by inserting ``a combat badge,'' after ``1129 of title 
        10,''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Combat badge defined.--In this subsection, the term 
        `combat badge' means a Combat Infantryman's Badge, Combat Action 
        Badge, Combat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, or Combat 
        Action Medal.''.

    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 704 of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended in each of subsections (c)(1) and (d) by striking ``or 
(b)''.

    Approved June 3, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 258:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-84 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013):
            May 20, considered and passed House.
            May 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
EX-10.7(a)



 Exhibit 10.7(a) 
 June 1, 2014 
 Eckhardt Trading Company 

1314 North Dearborn Parkway 
 The Carriage House

 Chicago, Illinois 60610 
 Attention:
Ms. Audrey L. Gale 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewal 
 Dear Ms. Gale: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreement concerning the
commodity pool to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2015 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 CMF Eckhardt Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mrs. Alice Lonero at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1304. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

					
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Alice Lonero
	 	
		 	 Alice Lonero
	 	
		 	Chief Financial Officer	 	
		
	ECKHARDT TRADING COMPANY	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ John D. Fornengo
	 	
		 	Print Name: John D. Fornengo	 	

 AL/sr
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Jonathan H. CohenName: Jonathan H. Cohen Date: August 8, 2014
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of East Coast Diversified Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2006 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Frank Rovito, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Frank Rovito

Frank RovitoChief Financial OfficerDated: March 7, 2006

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to East Coast Diversified Corporationand will be retained by East Coast Diversified Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 53600.

protests 89664-K, (El Paso, etc.).

#### Agricultural Products Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 56483.

protest 174188-K (New York).

#### Decca Navigator System, Inc. *v.*United States,

*428Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of parts of radar equipment the same in all material respects as the radar equipment the subject of *United States*v. *United Geophysical Company*(38 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 451). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the authority cited the radar equipment parts were held dutiable as claimed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8165 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8165

To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish qualifications for 
    the appointment of a person as a marriage and family therapist, 
   qualified to provide clinical supervision, in the Veterans Health 
                            Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2024

 Ms. Brownley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish qualifications for 
    the appointment of a person as a marriage and family therapist, 
   qualified to provide clinical supervision, in the Veterans Health 
                            Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A 
              PERSON AS A MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPIST, QUALIFIED TO 
              PROVIDE CLINICAL SUPERVISION, IN THE VETERANS HEALTH 
              ADMINISTRATION.

    Section 7402(b)(10) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses 
        (i) and (ii), respectively;
            (2) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``To be eligible''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph 
        (B):
    ``(B) To be eligible to be appointed to a marriage and family 
therapist position and qualified to provide clinical supervision, a 
person must--
            ``(i) have the qualifications set forth in subparagraph 
        (A); and
            ``(ii)(I) be authorized to provide clinical supervision in 
        the State described in clause (ii) of such subparagraph; or
            ``(II) be designated as an approved supervisor by the 
        American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered August 5, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00079-CV

EDDIE & SHIRLEY JONES AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellants

V.

HSBC BANK USA NATL ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-06600-A

ORDER

Before Justice Moseley, O’Neill, and FitzGerald

We construe appellants’ July 31, 2014 motion for extension of time to file brief as a 

motion for rehearing. We GRANT the motion to the extent that we WITHDRAW our July 31, 

2014 opinion, VACATE our judgment associated with that opinion, and REINSTATE this 

appeal. We ORDER appellants to file their brief no later than September 10, 2014. We caution 

appellants that no extensions will be granted and that failure to timely file the brief will result in 

dismissal of the appeal without further notice. 

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.5


 


This Environmental Indemnity Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made as of March 16, 2015.









    	1



    	 



    

 


 






    	2



    	 



    

 


 






    	3



    	 



    

 


 






    	4



    	 



    

 


 






    	5



    	 



    

 


 






    	6



    	 



    

 


 






    	7



    	 



    

 


 






    	8



    	 



    

 


 






    	9



    	 



    

 


 






    	10



    	 



    

 


 






    	11



    	 



    

 


 






    	12
No. 60897.

#### Irving M. Sobin Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 291149-K/14737 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, effective July 1, 1955, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David J. Hunter, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 564]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we find no merit to the contention of defendant that the verdict convicting him of the lesser included offense of assault in the third degree is against the weight of the evidence (see, *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). There is likewise no merit to the contention that the sentence is harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J.—Assault, 3rd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Law-ton, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
# C_2007229EN.01001201.xml

| 29.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/12

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain countervailing measures

(2007/C 229/07)

| 1. | As provided for in Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 (1) on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below. |
| --- | --- |

1.

As provided for in Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 (1) on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Division H-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

| 4. | This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997. |
| --- | --- |

4.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Compact disk recordables | India | Countervailing duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 960/2003 (OJ L 138, 5.6.2003, p. 1) | 5.6.2008 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Compact disk recordables

India

Countervailing duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 960/2003 (OJ L 138, 5.6.2003, p. 1)

5.6.2008

---

(1)  OJ L 288, 21.10.1997, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).

1

(2)  Fax (32-2) 295 65 05.

2

---
Honorable JimmyMorris

County Attorney Navarro County Courthouse Corelcana, Texas Opinion No. C-305 Re: Wherethe trial of a defendant in a criminal case results in a hungjury and upon eubeequent trial the defendant iraconvicted, IS the defendant taxed one or Dear Mr. Morris: twojury fees? Youhave requested,'an official opinion from this department concerning the following question relating to the defendant's liability for ajury fee in a justice court:

"If,a jury cannot'agree on a vetiict and ia:hung, and then another jury is lmpaneled andthe defendant ia convicted, is the deE;;;tnt taxed with twojury fees or just
Article 1075 of the Codeof Criminal Procedure provides: Jury fee In juatlce court. "If the defendant is convicted in a criminal action tried by a jury In ajustice court, ajury fee of three dollars shall be taxed zgainst,him." (Bnphasla wadded) Article I.?73of the C&d!of Criminal Procedure provides: In district and county courts. 'In each.crlmlnal action tried by ajury In thewtrict dr county court, or county court at law, ajury fee of five dollgrs ahall be taxed-against the defendant if he is convicted." (Emphaala added) It is fundamental that no coat or fees maybe taxed against a defendant in a criminal case where he is acquitted. ,'(See attached copy of Attorney Ceneral'e Opinion o-1773.)

-1458-Honorable JimmyMorris, page 2 (C-305)

Thestatutes provide that In the justice, district and county courts the taxation of a defendant for a jury fee la conting&nt upon conviction.

Aa quoted above, Article 1073 relating to the dlatrict and county courts la almost identical to Article 1075, except it Is more explicit In that it apeclflc+ly states that In each criminal,action the defendant is taxed a’jury fee if conmed. Article 907 of the Codeof Criminal Procedure provides:

Mistrial. "A jury shall be discharged if they fall to agree to a verdict after being kept together’a reaeoliable time. If there be time left on the sameday, another jury maybe impaneled to try the cause, or the justice may adjourn for not.more than two days andagain lmpanel a jury to try duch cause. I’ It is well established that In a criminal case where’the jury fails to agree on a verdict and Is subsequently dlaml8sed,’ a mistrial is declared. Howeves, this does not reeult in the dletilsaal of the tiase, rather, the pending cause ia continued until such time as a newjury can be lmpaneled. Aathe above quoted statutes are clear andunambiguous, it follows that only one jury fee ‘la to be’taxed against a defendant,,who is convicted In a criminal cause tried in the juatlce’couti, even though in a ptilor trial the jury was diacharged for failare to agree to a verdict. SVMMARY In any criminal cause In a justice court a defendant, If convicted, can only be,t?xed one jury fee notwithstanding that more than one .jury was lmpaneled to ”hear the case. ,. Youra very truly;

WAGGONER

CARR Attorney General of Texans_ .. --

Honorable JimmyMorris, page 3 (C-305)

RWN/dt/br APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE: W.V. Geppert, Chairman JameaStrogk **Joe** Long Charles B. Swanner Malcolm Quick APPROVED

FORTREATTORNEY

GENEXUL Bg: Stanton Stone

**- 1460-**
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 15, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2029 Lower Tribunal No. F95-3111B

________________ Mauricio Solorzano, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas J. Rebull, Judge. Mauricio Solorzano, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
# C_2007219EN.01000101.xml

| 19.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/1

---

Amendments to the Explanatory Note to Article 17 of the pan-Euro-Mediterranean protocols on rules of origin

(2007/C 219/01)

The Note to Article 17 — ‘Certification of origin for the purpose of pan-Euro-Mediterranean cumulation’, the paragraph ‘Mandatory use of the movement certificate EUR-MED’, shall be completed with the following example:

‘3.   Example of cumulation applied in one of the countries referred to Articles 3(2) and 4(2) when an originating product is exported to one of the Mediterranean countries

Swiss white chocolate in bulk (HS 1704) is imported into the Community where the chocolate bars are formed and packed for sale. The Community originating status of chocolate (HS 1704) is obtained on the basis of cumulation with Switzerland therefore when the chocolate is exported to Tunisia, the Community customs administration must issue a movement certificate EUR-MED containing a statement “Cumulation applied with Switzerland”.’

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1 In the minute order, the parties were directed to refer back

to the original status order for pertinent deadlines.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIRECTV, INC., a California

corporation,

NO. CIV. S-04-2534 LKK/DAD

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

MICHAEL CROW,

Defendant.

 /

By a minute order dated March 30, 2005, both parties in the

above-captioned case were notified that a Status Conference was set

before the undersigned on April 18, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. Both parties

were ordered to file with the court and serve upon all other

parties, not later seven (7) days before the conference, a status

report.1 Defendant’s counsel has failed to do so. 

////

Case 2:04-cv-02534-LKK -DAD Document 14 Filed 04/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, the court hereby ORDERS that:

1. Counsel for defendant is ordered to SHOW CAUSE, within 

fifteen (15) days of the effective date of this order, why

sanctions should not be imposed for failing to file a status

report; 

2. The Status Conference set for April 18, 2005 at 1:30 p.m.

is CONTINUED to May 23, 2005 at 2:30 p.m.

3. Counsel for defendant shall FILE a status report ten (10)

days prior to the conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 21, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02534-LKK -DAD Document 14 Filed 04/22/05 Page 2 of 2
Southern Star Central Corp.

Southern Star Central Gas PIpeline, Inc.

4700 Highway 56

Owensboro, KY 42301



May 10, 2010



Richard J. Reischman

P.O. Box 467

Tonganoxie, KS 66086



Dear Rick:



This letter is being presented for your consideration as respects the current Employment Agreement Agreement between Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc. (SSCGP), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Star Central Corp. (Company) and you, Richard J. Reischman, named Executive dated August 11, 2005, as amended January 1, 2009.



Pursuant to paragraph 4(a) of the original Agreement, dated August 11, 2005, language provides for its expiration concurrent with the fifth anniversary from that date, or August 11, 2010. SSCGP and Company desire to extend said Agreement until December 31, 2010.  The Agreement will expire at midnight December 31, 2010 without prior notice being required of either SSCGP and Company, or Executive.



SSCGP and Company will be in the process of reviewing potential employment terms of all SSCGP Officers beyond that date.



If the above terms are acceptable to you, please execute in the space provided below and return to Rob Carlton, Vice President, Human Resources by close of business May 13, 2010.  Otherwise, the existing Agreement terminates on August 11, 2010.



SOUTHERN STAR CENTRAL CORP.



/s/ Beverly H. Griffith

Beverly H. Griffith



SOUTHERN STAR CENTRAL GAS PIPELINE, INC



/s/ Robert W. Carlton

Robert W. Carlton

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:



/s/ Richard J. Reischman

Richard J. Reischman

Date:  5/12/2010



# Endnotes





Exhibit 10.36
|   | Historical Image Display:Image Title:BAHIA DE PONCE AND APPROACHESDownload Map/Chart(right-click):25683-3-1979.jpgShare this page:TweetImage Metadata:Image:        			25683-03-1979Type:        			Nautical ChartYear:        			1979Scale:        			1:20000Publisher:        			NOAA-NOSSize:        			41.0 x 34.0 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

Privacy PolicyDisclaimerNOAA's National Ocean ServiceNOAAU.S. Department of Commerce