alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4908 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4908

To designate the checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located 
   on United States Highway 90 West in Uvalde County, Texas, as the 
            ``James R. Dominguez Border Patrol Checkpoint''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2024

    Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Cruz, and Mr. Manchin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located 
   on United States Highway 90 West in Uvalde County, Texas, as the 
            ``James R. Dominguez Border Patrol Checkpoint''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``James R. Dominguez Memorial Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

     Congress finds the following:
            (1) A native of San Antonio, Texas, Border Patrol Agent 
        James R. Dominguez--
                    (A) proudly and honorably served his country as an 
                agent of the U.S. Border Patrol for more than 12 years;
                    (B) began his service with the U.S. Border Patrol 
                in 2000; and
                    (C) graduated as part of the 434th session of the 
                Border Patrol Academy.
            (2) Agent Dominguez served at the Uvalde Station in the Del 
        Rio Sector.
            (3) On July 19, 2012, Agent Dominguez stopped to clear 
        debris from the roadway that posed risks to road and community 
        safety along Highway 90 near Cline, Texas. While on scene, 
        Agent Dominguez was struck and killed by a passing vehicle.
            (4) Agent Dominguez is survived by his wife and 4 children.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION.

    The checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located on United 
States Highway 90 West in Uvalde County, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``James R. Dominguez Border Patrol Checkpoint''.

SEC. 4. REFERENCES.

     Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the checkpoint described in section 3 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James R. Dominguez Border 
Patrol Checkpoint''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2007043EN.01000101.xml

| 27.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 43/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 12.3.2002 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 650/01 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Equity injection notification — An Post |
| Legal basis | Section 31 of the Postal and Telecommuications Act, 1983 |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Services of general economic interest |
| Form of aid | Other forms of equity intervention |
| Budget | Annual budget: —; Overall budget: EUR 12,7 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration | 1.1.2002-31.12.2003 |
| Economic sectors | Post and telecommunications |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Department of Public Enterprise |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

12.3.2002

Reference number of the aid

N 650/01

Member State

Ireland

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Equity injection notification — An Post

Legal basis

Section 31 of the Postal and Telecommuications Act, 1983

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Services of general economic interest

Form of aid

Other forms of equity intervention

Budget

Annual budget: —; Overall budget: EUR 12,7 million

Intensity

—

Duration

1.1.2002-31.12.2003

Economic sectors

Post and telecommunications

Name and address of the granting authority

Department of Public Enterprise

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 333-141818 and 333-149498 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 10,
2010, relating to the financial statements of SenoRx, Inc., and the
effectiveness of Senorx, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SenoRx, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2009.





/s/
      DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPCosta
      Mesa, California
              March
      10, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4966 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4966

To authorize public housing agencies to use assistance from the Capital 
                 Fund for energy performance contracts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2024

 Mr. Welch (for himself, Mr. Van Hollen, and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                 on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize public housing agencies to use assistance from the Capital 
                 Fund for energy performance contracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Energy Efficiency for 
Affordable Housing Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. USE OF CAPITAL FUND ASSISTANCE BY PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCIES FOR 
              ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS.

    Section 9(d) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 
1437g(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(K), by inserting before ``and by'' the 
        following: ``by entering into energy performance contracts (as 
        defined in paragraph (4)),''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Definition of energy performance contract.--For 
        purposes of this subsection, the term `energy performance 
        contract' means a contract described in section 990.185(a) of 
        title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor 
        regulation.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case No. 15,089.

#### UNITED STATES v. FIELDS.

[4 Blatchf. 326.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

May 26, 1859.

Practice ix Equity—Bill op Revivok.

Where a defendant in a suit in equity has neither been served with process nor appeared in the suit, a bill of revivor against his administrator, after his death, is not proper, and the court will not make an order reviving the suit against such administrator.

This was a bill in equity, filed by the United States against George A. Gardiner in his lifetime, and the New York Life Insurance and Trust Company. A subpoena and an injunction were served upon the trust company, as the depository "of certain moneys sought to be recovered by the plaintiffs in this suit, the ground of the suit being that *1068those moneys had been fraudulently obtained by Gardiner, under the Mexican claims commission. The plaintiffs having filed a bill of revivor against the administrator of Gardiner [Thomas C. Fields], now applied for an order reviving the suit against him as such administrator.

Charles H. Hunt, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiffs.

Abraham B. Tappen, for defendant.

1

 [Reported by Hon. Samuel Blatehford, District Judge, and here reprinted by permission.]

HALL, District Judge.

As it appears that Gardiner, the defendant in the original suit, never appeared therein, and was never even served with process, I am of the opinion that a bill of revivor is not proper, and that the application for the order sought by the attorney for the United States must be denied. The following authorities are, I think, decisive of the case, and they will sufficiently indicate the course proper to be pursued: 3 Daniell, Ch. Prac. 1673, 1698, 1707, 1708; 2 Barb. Ch. Prac. 36, 37; Crowfoot v. Mander, 9 Sim. 396; Stewart v. Nicholls, Tam. 307; Hardy v. Hull, 14 Sim. 21; Foster v. Foster, 16 Sim. 637.

The motion is denied, but without prejudice to any future application for leave to file a supplemental bill, or a bill in the nature of a supplemental bill, or to any motion which the United States or the defendant may think proper to make.
# Table 2

# Table 4

# Table 5

# Table 8

# Table 10

# Table 11
No. 54713.

#### H. Sussbach et al. *v.*United States,

protests 132409-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as *284those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

NO. CIV. S-04-2470 LKK/KJM

Plaintiff,

v.

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11550 O R D E R

MUSHROOM TRAIL, GRASS VALLEY,

NEVADA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,

APN: 53-130-31, INCLUDING ALL

APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS

THERETO,

Defendant.

 /

A hearing in this case is presently scheduled for October 24,

2005, at 10:00 a.m., on the Law and Motion Calendar of this court

pursuant the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Local

Rule 78-230(c) for the Eastern District of California specifies

that an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the granting

of the motion shall be in writing and shall be served and filed not

less than fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing. Claimant has

failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition. 

Case 2:04-cv-02470-LKK -KJM Document 27 Filed 10/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows:

1. Counsel for claimant is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in

writing not later than ten (10) days from the effective date of

this order why sanctions should not issue in the above-captioned

case in the amount of One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150) as required

by Local Rule 11-110 for failure to file a timely opposition in

accordance with Local Rule 78-230, unless that party timely files

a written Statement of No Opposition. Hearing shall be held on the

Order to Show Cause at the time of hearing on this motion. 

2. The hearing on the motion for summary judgment presently

before the court is CONTINUED to November 7, 2005, where it will

be called on the court’s regularly scheduled Law and Motion

Calendar, beginning at 10:00 a.m. 

3. Claimant's counsel is directed to file and serve the

opposition no later than October 24, 2005 at 4:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 12, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02470-LKK -KJM Document 27 Filed 10/13/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 58581.

protests 167964-K, etc. (New York).

#### The London Gramophone Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper coverings containing phonograph records the subject of *United States*v. *Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division*(41 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 541), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Sprinkle, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 83]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered October 6, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of *41⁄2*to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court’s curative instructions, given at the request of defense counsel, in connection with the prosecutor’s inaccurate summary of a portion of the testimony, and regarding a comment that might have been construed as shifting the burden of proof, served to eliminate any prejudice to defendant. It is presumed that the jury understood and followed those instructions *(People v Davis,*58 NY2d 1102, 1104).

The defense summation urged the jury to accept a version of the events herein that was unsupported by trial evidence. In such circumstances, the prosecutor in summation could properly characterize the argument as absurd *(see, People v Jones,*162 AD2d 204, *lv denied*76 NY2d 859). Defendant’s claim that certain of the prosecutor’s other comments in summation might have suggested an uncharged crime is unpreserved by appropriate and timely objection (CPL 470.05). In any event, the comments were responsive to the defense summation *(People v Marks,*6 NY2d 67, *cert denied*362 US 912), and the trial court’s final instructions prevented any prejudice to defendant. In all other respects, the prosecutor’s summation *270constituted fair comment on the evidence *(People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
(LOGO) KPMG

2500 Ruan Center
666 Grand Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50309

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

The Board of Directors
Norwest Mortgage, Inc.:

We  have  examined  management's  assertion  about  Norwest  Mortgage  Banking's
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended  December 31, 1999,  included in the
accompanying  management  assertion.   Management  is  responsible  for  Norwest
Mortgage  Banking's  compliance  with those  minimum  servicing  standards.  Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion  on  management's  assertion  about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about Norwest Mortgage Banking's compliance
with the minimum servicing  standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination on Norwest Mortgage  Banking's  compliance with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion,  management's  assertion that Norwest  Mortgage Banking complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1999, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

January l8,2000

KPMG LLP
#### JOSEPH SPIOTTA, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. WILLIAM H. WILSON, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

See same case below: 72 *N. J. Super.*572.

*Mr. Benjamin Wasserman*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Herbert G. Klei/n*for the respondent.

May 14, 1962.
# C_2007316EN.01005801.xml

| 28.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/58

---

Commission communication concerning the extension of the validity of Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 316/08)

The Commission has decided to extend the validity of the current Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection (published in the
  Official Journal of the European Communities C 37, 3.2.2001, p. 3) until such time as new guidelines are published or, at any event, until 30 April 2008 at the latest.

Official Journal of the European Communities

---
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Barry H. Bass, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First PotomacRealty Trust;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under its supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report its conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board oftrustees (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.
    Date: November 9, 2004 /s/ Barry H. Bass   Barry H. Bass
No. 52317.

protest 57471-K (New York).

#### A. W. Fenton Co. (Smith & Nephew, Inc.) *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein, (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the *315Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector' on each of the entries. The protest was sustained to this extent.
No. 59042.

protests 938605-G, etc. (New York).

#### Bingham & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

*369Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
Before the First Division,

May 28, 1947

No. 51746.

#### Protest 130769-K of Gotham Watch Co., Inc. (New York).

*207Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of finished straps for watches composed in chief value of pigmented polyvinyl chloride, a synthetic resin similar in material, quality, texture, and the use to which it may be applied, to india rubber not known as “hard rubber,” and that said straps are not a laminated product, nor are they manufactures of any other product of which any synthetic resin or resinlike substance is the chief binding agent. Accepting the stipulation as a statement of fact, it was held that the merchandise in question is properly dutiable at 25 percent under the provision of paragraph 1537 (b) for manufactures of india rubber, not specially provided for, by virtue of the similitude provision of paragraph 1559.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING

AGENCY,

NO. CIV. S-04-1614 WBS KJM

Plaintiff

v. O R D E R

BRYAN DEVORE, DEVORE

CONSTRUCTION INC., DEVORE

EXCAVATION & SNOW REMOVAL,

Defendants.

----oo0oo---- 

In his statement in opposition to plaintiff’s motion

for summary judgment, defendant Bryan Devore request that the

hearing on the motion be continued for 90 days to allow him to

consult with an attorney and secure legal representation. Devore

argues that such a continuance is necessary because plaintiff’s

“legal maneuvering and the volume of paperwork they have created

[have made it] beyond [defendants’] ability to respond without

council [sic].” (Defs.’ Separate Statement in Opp. To Mot. For

Summary Judgment ¶ 2). The court is reluctant to grant such a

lengthy continuance at this point in the case. However, the

Case 2:04-cv-01614-WBS -KJM Document 21 Filed 05/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

court will consider the parties’ arguments regarding a possible

continuance of lesser duration at oral argument on May 31, 2005

at 1:30 p.m. before it hears argument on the merits of

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. 

DATED: May 23, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-01614-WBS -KJM Document 21 Filed 05/24/05 Page 2 of 2