alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8154 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend telehealth services 

for federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2024 

Mr. MURPHY (for himself, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. VAN ORDEN, and Mr. NEHLS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend 

telehealth services for federally qualified health centers 

and rural health clinics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENDING TELEHEALTH SERVICES FOR FED4 ERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTERS AND 

5 RURAL HEALTH CLINICS. 

6 Section 1834(m)(8)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 1395m(m)(8)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘During 

8 the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B) 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8154 IH

1 and, during the 151-day period beginning on the first day 

2 after the end of such emergency period—’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘With respect to telehealth services furnished during or 

4 after the emergency period described in section 

5 1135(g)(1)(B)—’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
sppr8k_mar27letter.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 






 


March 25, 2015


 


Corrine L. Scarpello


Senior Vice President and


  Chief Financial Officer


Supertel Hospitality, Inc.


1800 West Pasewalk Avenue, Suite 200


Norfolk, Nebraska 68701


 


Dear Connie,


 


As discussed, we agree that you will extend your service as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from April 1, 2015 for a period to end no later than the hiring of a new chief financial officer.  Additionally, the August 15, 2015 date set forth in the Company’s letter to you, dated December 22, 2014, is extended by the length of such period.  All other matters set forth in the Company’s letter remain unchanged.


 


If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please sign and date below and return a signed copy to me.


 


Supertel Hospitality, Inc.




 


/s/ George R. Whittemore


George R. Whittemore


Director & Chairman of the Compensation Committee


 


Accepted and agreed this March 25, 2015


 


/s/ Corrine L. Scarpello


Corrine L. Scarpello
##### 



Exhibit 10.38
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
LINE LETTER
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LINE LETTER
 W I T N E S S E T H:
    Section 1. Amendments .
   provided provided
 Section 2. Effectiveness of Amendment .
   - 1 -




---



##### 



Section 3. Effect of Amendment; Ratification; Representations; etc.
    (i)
    
    the representations and warranties of the Borrower set forth in
the Line Letter and in the other Loan Documents are true and correct, and(ii)
    
    no Event of Default or event or condition that, with the giving
of notice or passage of time or both, would constitute an Event of Default has
occurred and is continuing.
 Section 4. New York Law .
  Section 5. Severability .
   - 2 -




---



##### 



Section 6. Counterparts .
   PENN OCTANE CORPORATION
    
    RZB FINANCE LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Ian Bothwell
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Pearl GeffersName: Ian Bothwell
    
    
    
    Name: Pearl GeffersTitle: Acting Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Title: First Vice PresidentBy:
    
    /s/ Nancy ReminiName: Nancy ReminiTitle: Vice President
  - 3 -
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harold C. Simmons,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory M. Swalwell, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ Harold C.
Simmons


Harold C.
Simmons


Chief
Executive Officer








/s/ Gregory M.
Swalwell


Gregory
M. Swalwell


Chief Financial Officer








November
3, 2008








Note:  The
certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly
stated in such filing.
# C_2007162EN.01000401.xml

| 14.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 162/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 30.4.2007 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 28/07 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | Molise |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Cantieri Navali di Termoli SpA |
| Legal basis | Deliberazione della giunta regionale del 18.9.2006 n. 1358 — regolamento che disciplina la concessione dei finanziamenti per il salvataggio delle imprese in difficoltà |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Rescue of firms in difficulty |
| Form of aid | Soft loan |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 3 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration | 6 months |
| Economic sector | Shipbuilding |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Regione Molise — Italia |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

30.4.2007

Reference number of the aid

N 28/07

Member State

Italy

Region

Molise

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Cantieri Navali di Termoli SpA

Legal basis

Deliberazione della giunta regionale del 18.9.2006 n. 1358 — regolamento che disciplina la concessione dei finanziamenti per il salvataggio delle imprese in difficoltà

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Rescue of firms in difficulty

Form of aid

Soft loan

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 3 million

Intensity

—

Duration

6 months

Economic sector

Shipbuilding

Name and address of the granting authority

Regione Molise — Italia

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/2999/
No. 54096.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64103-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 44076.

#### Protests 699148-G, etc., of Ades Bros., Inc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Dallingee, J.

On the agreed facts it was held that certain vases, trays, bowls, incense burners, jars, and boxes are dutiable as claimed at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils on the authority of Abstracts 35047 and 42727.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, William D. Eglin, Chief Executive Officer of MD
Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of MD Technologies Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MD
Technologies Inc.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2005 |  | /s/ William D. Eglin   
|                   |  | William D. Eglin       
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                      
|----- |  | ---------------------
|      |  | /s/ JONATHAN H. COHEN
|Name: |  | Jonathan H. Cohen    
|Date: |  | May 8, 2008
#### Mrs. F. J. Bochterle, sometimes known as Alida Bochterle, *et vir,*v. Florida Milk Company, Inc.

182 So. 215.

Opinion Filed June 15, 1938.

*828/. *Carl Lamb din,*for Appellants;

*Frank M. Harris*and *Richard E. Cotton,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from an order of the Circuit Court appointing, without notice, a receiver *pendente lite*of a coffee shop and dining room alleged to be the “separate statutory estate” of a married woman, the suit being to subject the property to pay for milk and dairy products purchased by the married woman for use in the coffee shop and dining room business operated by her.

“A wife’s *separate estate*is an equitable estate in property the legal title to which is in some other person for her benefit. In equity such separate estate may be subjected to the payment of the debts of the wife, if not restrained by the legal effect of the instrument creating the estate.”

“A wife’s *separate property*in Florida is that which she holds in her own right by virtue of the Act of March 6, 1845; by Section 26, Article IV, Constitution of 1868; and by Section 1, Article XI, Constitution 1885.” Headnotes 17 and 18 of Blood v. Hunt, 97 Fla. 551, 121 So. 886.

“A receiver should not be appointed except on notice to the party whose property is to be. divested, except in cases of the greatest emergency demanding the immediate interference of the court for the prevention of irreparable injury; and in such a case the bill should set forth with particularity the facts and circumstances relied on to justify an *ex parte*exercise of this extraordinary power, and should be sworn *829to or supported by the affidavit' of complainant or other competent person.” Jones v. Rakestraw, 59 Fla. 537, 51 So. 927.

Jacksonville Ferry Co. v. Stockton, 40 Fla. 141, 23 So. 557; Poynter v. Smith, 120 Fla. 469, 162 So. 874; See Sections 73 and 74 of 1931 Chancery Act, and annotations by Edward McCarthy, Jr.

The bill of complaint filed February 8, 1938, alleges :

“That all of said milk and dairy products were purchased for use 'in the operation of and conduct of said business. That said defendant still continues to conduct said business, but expects in the near future on the closing of the season to close said business and leave the State of Florida, and that plaintiff would have no recourse for the satisfaction of its debt if a receiver is not appointed to sequester the rents and profits of- said business until a final decree can be obtained in this cause, and, if necessary, to sell the aforesaid properties. That plaintiff is informed, and believes, and so alleges that the amount which would be realized solely from the sale of such properties, after deducting expenses of detention and sale of said goods, would not be sufficient to pay the indebtedness of plaintiff. That from reading the letter from J. Carl Lambdin, which is hereto attached, it will appear that Mrs. Bochterle is insolvent.”

Such allegations are insufficient to justify the appointment of a receiver without notice to the defendants.

Reversed.

Whitfif.ld, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23









                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology, Inc.



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-81508 and No. 333-73024) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-74148, No. 333-74150, No.
333-74152, No. 333-67950 and No. 333-31642) on Form S-8 of Lumenon Innovative
Lightwave Technology, Inc. (the "Corporation") of our report dated August 9,
2002, except as to note 14 which is at August 14, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of the Corporation as of June 30, 2002 and 2001 and
the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders'
equity for the years ended June 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and the period from
inception (March 2, 1998) to June 30, 2002 which report appears in the June 30,
2002 annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Corporation.




/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Montreal, Canada
October 28, 2002
State Implementation Plan Revision: 2011 Base Year Inventory for

the Pennsylvania Portion of Five 2008 Ozone Nonattainment Areas:

Allentown

- Bethlehem

- Easton, Lancaster, Philadelphia

- Wilmington

- Atlantic City, Pittsburgh

- Beaver Valley, Reading



### MOVES Files

To support its mobile source emissions MOVES modeling for its 2011 base year emission inventories

, Pennsylvania submitted hundreds of files whose cumulative size is approximately 242 MB

. Many of these files are multi

- spreadsheet Microsoft EXCEL files or model input and output files that are not easily converted to the pdf format for uploading to www.regulations.gov

. Because of the large number of files and the format of these file

, they are not availabl e for download from www.regulations.gov . Copies of the s e files are available for public inspection at the EPA Region III address listed in the Federal Register Proposed Rule document. For further information, EPA Regio n III's point of contact (POC) is listed in this docket.
Exhibit 10.55

 

Nonemployee Director Compensation Guidelines

 

Following a review conducted by the Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company of changing practices for compensating outside directors, on March 20, 2015, the Board approved a new compensation arrangement for recognizing the service of outside directors and more closely aligning their overall compensation with the interests of other shareholders.  The Chairman of the Board will continue to receive an annual fee of $80,000 paid in equal quarterly increments.  Each nonemployee director will receive an annual fee of $40,000 paid in equal quarterly increments.  The chairperson of the Audit Committee of the Board (the “Audit Committee”) will receive an annual fee of $18,000, and each non-chair member of the Audit Committee will receive an annual fee of $8,000, payable quarterly. The Chairperson of the Compensation Committee will receive an annual fee of $12,500, and each non-chair member of the Compensation Committee will continue to receive an annual fee of $5,000, payable quarterly. The Chairperson of the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board (the “Governance Committee”) will receive an annual fee of $10,000, and each non-chair member of the Governance Committee will continue to receive an annual fee of $5,000, payable quarterly. Directors will not be paid a separate amount for each board or committee meeting attended.  Each nonemployee director who continues to serve beyond an Annual Shareholder Meeting will also receive a stock option to purchase 15,000 shares granted on January 1st of each fiscal year, with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, and will vest in equal quarterly increments over a period of one year.  Any nonemployee director joining the Board mid-year will be provided a pro-rata annual grant for service until the next Annual Meeting. In addition, each current nonemployee director received a one-time stock option to purchase 15,000 shares on March 20, 2015, and any future nonemployee director who joins the Board will also receive a one-time stock option to purchase 15,000 shares on the date of such director’s appointment, with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of such grant, and to vest in equal monthly installments over a period of three years. These equity grants will be made under the terms of the existing equity compensation plans.  These new arrangements replaced the previous nonemployee director compensation program.
Exhibit 10.67



October 7th, 2004



Steven J. Davis, General Counsel

Molecular Imaging Corporation

9530 Towne Centre Drive, Suite #120

San Diego, California 92121



|Re: | Securities Purchase Agreement
|--- | -----------------------------



Dear Steve:



Reference is made to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of July 12, 2002 (the Agreement) by and among Molecular Imaging Corporation (the Company), Ivan Bradbury and
Integrated Healthcare Management, S.A., as such Agreement was assigned to Dragon Nominees Limited (Purchaser).



Effective as of the date that Mr. Kenneth Frederick becomes the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Dragon agrees to waive its rights under Sections 4.06 (a), (b),
(c) and (d) of the Agreement with respect to the nomination of a Purchaser Designee (as defined in the Agreement) to the Companys Board of Directors, until the first to occur of (i) the date which is six (6) months after the effective date
that Mr. Frederick becomes CEO or (ii) the date which Mr. Frederick is no longer a member of the Companys Board of Directors.



Sincerely,



|                        |  |                     
|----------------------- |  | --------------------
|Dragon Nominees Limited
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /S/    IVAN
BRADBURY



Acknowledged and Agreed:



|                              |  |                       
|----------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Molecular Imaging Corporation
|                              | 
|By:                           |  | /S/    STEVEN J.
DAVIS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julian Peters, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 1018]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered May 25, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
(Reap. Dec. 8560)

#### Filjay Imports *v.*United States

Entry No. 752792, etc.

(Decided March 16, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the entered unit values less the addition made under duress to meet the advances by the Appraiser in similar cases covering non-dutiable E.O.B., charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling and lighterage.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher domestic value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals to Re-appraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to he the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the entered unit values, less the additions *548made under duress to meet the advances by the appraiser in similar cases covering nondutiable f. o. b. charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling, and lighterage.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

Inconnection with the Form 10-Q of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. for the quarterended September 30, 2010, I, William R. Talley, Jr., Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Frederick CountyBancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge andbelief, that:

 

(1)         such Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         the information contained insuch Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofFrederick County Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/  William R. Talley, Jr.                                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William  R. Talley, Jr.                                                        |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and Chief Operating Officer |   |

 

----
No. 50503.

#### Protests 941161-G, etc., of S. S. Kresge Co. (Baltimore).

*271Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court’s decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.