alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of James Boothby, as Acting Director of the J. N. Adam Developmental Disabilities Service Office, Appellant, v Margaret S., Respondent.

[635 NYS2d 390]

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and petition reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in dismissing without prejudice a petition seeking authorization for a thyroidectomy to be performed on respondent, who is mentally retarded. The petition alleges that, "by reason of her mental retardation, [respondent] is unable to make a meaningful decision with respect to the necessity and desirability of having an operation performed on her.” Petitioner’s citation to a superseded regulation is not fatal to the petition, particularly where the later regulation is substantially the same as the earlier one. Petitioner cited the correct regulation, i.e., 14 NYCRR 633.11 (a) (1) (iii), in opposition to the motion to dismiss. Pursuant to that regulation, informed consent to proposed professional medical treatment must be obtained from a court of competent jurisdiction for those persons who reside at a facility operated or certified by the Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities. Respondent does not dispute that she resides in such a facility. In any event, "the State has a legitimate interest in asserting its *parens patriae*powers over the mentally incompetent, both to provide care and to safeguard the best interests of those who are physically unable to care for themselves” *(Matter of Eichner [Fox],*73 AD2d 431, 451, *mod sub nom. Matter of Eichner v Dillon,*52 NY2d 363, *cert denied sub nom. Storar v Storar*454 US 858). We reject the contention of respondent that disparate treatment of mentally ill and mentally retarded persons violates her right to equal protection *(see generally, Heller v Doe,*509 US 312). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J.—Medical Authorization.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF DESERT HEALTH PRODUCTS, INC.

ARTICLE I
----------
NAME: The name of the corporation shall be Desert Health Products, Inc.

ARTICLE II
----------
PURPOSE: The purpose for which this corporation is organized is the
transaction of any or all lawful business for which corporations may be
incorporated under the laws of the State of Arizona, as they may be amended
from time to time.

ARTICLE III
-----------
INITIAL BUSINESS: The corporation initially intends to market and manufacture
health foods.

ARTICLE IV
----------
AUTHORIZED CAPITAL: The corporation shall have authority to issue one million
(1,000,000) shares of common stock of the par value of One Dollar
($1.00) per share.

ARTICLE V
---------
STATUTORY AGENT:    The name and address of the Initial Statutory Agent, a
bona fide resident of Arizona for three years is:

     Garth A. Harris
     14950 N. 83rd Place, Ste. 1
     Scottsdale, Arizona 85260

ARTICLE VI
----------
BOARD OF DIRECTORS: The initial Board of Directors shall consist of:
The Directors are also the incorporators.

GEORGIA AADLAND     P.O. BOX 6313                 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261
GARTH A. HARRIS     14950 N/ 83RD PLACE, SUITE 1  SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260

/S/ GEORGIA AADLAND                     /S/ GARTH A. HARRIS

DATED THIS 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 1991.

I GARTH A, HARRIS, having been designated to act as Statutory Agent, hereby
consent to act in that capacity until removed or resignation is submitted in
accordance with the Arizona Revised Statutes.

/s/ GARTH A. HARRIS
Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 10, 2009
    By:
    /s/ MICHAEL S. DUNLAPName:
    Michael S. DunlapTitle:
    Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ TERRY J. HEIMESName:
    Terry J. HeimesTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) of TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JONATHAN H. COHEN, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/    JONATHAN H. COHEN                 
|Name: Jonathan H. Cohen Date: May 9,
2007
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8161 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army 

from retiring an energy generation source if that retirement would raise 

customer electricity rates and decrease regional energy reliability by 

more than 10 percent, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2024 

Mr. NEWHOUSE (for himself, Mr. FULCHER, Mr. BENTZ, and Mr. 

ROSENDALE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 

Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary 

of the Army from retiring an energy generation source 

if that retirement would raise customer electricity rates 

and decrease regional energy reliability by more than 

10 percent, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Electric Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8161 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON RETIREMENT OF ENERGY GEN2 ERATION SOURCES. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall not re5 tire an energy generation source if the retirement of 

6 that energy generation source would— 

7 (A) raise customer electricity rates by 

8 more than 10 percent; or 

9 (B) decrease energy reliability, as deter10 mined by the Administrator of the Bonneville 

11 Power Administration, in any portion of Wash12 ington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and 

13 California by more than 10 percent of the en14 ergy reliability as compared to the 12-month 

15 period before the retirement. 

16 (2) SAFETY EXCEPTION.— 

17 (b) REPLACEMENT OF BASELOAD GENERATION.— 

18 Not later than 30 days after retiring an energy generation 

19 source, the Secretary shall ensure that not less than 100 

20 percent of the baseload generation of the retired energy 

21 generation source has been replaced. 

22 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

23 (1) BASELOAD GENERATION.—The term ‘‘base24 load generation’’ means the the minimum amount of 

25 electric power supplied to an electrical grid. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8161 IH

1 (2) ENERGY GENERATION SOURCE.—The term 

2 ‘‘energy generation source’’ means a federally oper3 ated dam that generates hydropower. 

4 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ 

5 means— 

6 (A) the Secretary of the Interior, in ref7 erence to an energy generation source operated 

8 by the Bureau of Reclamation; and 

9 (B) the Secretary of the Army, in ref10 erence to an energy generation source operated 

11 by the Army Corps of Engineers. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                  
|--------------------- |  | -----------------
|/S/ PATRICK F. CONROY
|Name:                 |  | Patrick F. Conroy
|Date:                 |  | May 8, 2009
March 20, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Delivery of Dronair Solutions' Operating Documents [Docket No. FAA-2015-0648]

To Whom it May Concern:

As you are aware, this office represents Dronair Solutions ("Dronair") regarding the above referenced 

Petition for Exemption, in which Dronair seeks regulatory relief to allow commercial operation of small 

unmanned aerial vehicles. Please accept this letter as confirmation that the following operating documents, 

which contain proprietary information, were hand-delivered to Jake J. Troutman, Program Analyst, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Safety, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division, on March 19, 2015:

 Dronair sUAS Flight Operations Manual

 Dronair DJI S1000 sUAS Aircraft Flight Manual

 Dronair Aeryon SkyRanger Aircraft Flight Manual 

If you have any other questions, or need any additional information to process this exemption 

request, please contact the undersigned or John McGraw at:

 John McGraw Aerospace Consulting, LLC

Phone: 540-219-1638

Email: john@jmacaerospace.aero

Very truly yours, 

Matthew J. Clark

Mark E. McKinnon

 

 Counsel for Dronair Solutions

Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com

Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336.8714

Matthew J. Clark

703.336.871

Email Address

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com
#### UNITED STATES, Appellant v HUGH S. GILLEY, Private, U. S. Army, Appellee

14 USCMA 226, 34 CMR 6

No. 16,965

November 8, 1963

*First Lieutenant Charles M. Pallesen, Jr.,*argued the cause for Appellant, United States. With him on the brief were *Colonel Bruce C. Babbitt, Lieutenant Colonel Francis M. Cooper,*and *Captain Peter J. McGinn.*

*Captain James Joseph McGowan*argued the- cause for Appellee, Accused. With him on the brief were *Colonel Joseph L. Chalk*and *Captain Charles W. Schiesser.*

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

The Judge Advocate General of the Army has certified two questions to this Court concerning the propriety of the board of review’s action in setting aside and dismissing a purported finding of guilty of assault and battery, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 128, 10 USC § 928. The accused remains properly convicted of two specifications of indecent assault, in violation of Code, supra, Article 134, 10 USC § 934, and the board held that the dismissed count had no impact upon the sentence as adjudged and approved below.

Under the circumstances, we deem the questions presented to be moot. Cf. United States v Bedgood, 12 USCMA 16, 30 CMR 16. Practically speaking, *227any action which we might take with respect to the certified issues would not materially alter the situation presented with respect either to the accused or the Government. Cf. United States v Subia, 12 USCMA 23, 30 CMR 23; United States v Marymont, 11 USCMA 745, 29 CMR 561. Accordingly, we decline to answer them.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 

          - [CBP Dec. 07-09] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of re-accreditation of R. Markey & Sons, Inc., of New York, New York, as an accredited commercial laboratory. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12, R. Markey & Sons, Inc., 5 Hanover Square, New York, New York 10004, has been re-accredited to test sugar, sugar syrups and confectionary products under Chapter 17 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analysis should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific tests this entity is accredited to perform may be directed to the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *http://www.cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​org_​and_​operations.xml*.                     

# DATES:

The re-accreditation of R. Markey & Sons, Inc., as an accredited laboratory became effective on February 15, 2005. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for February 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Eugene J. Bondoc, Ph.D, or Randall Breaux, Laboratories and Scientific Services, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060. 

Dated: March 15, 2007. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director Laboratories and Scientific Services.

 [FR Doc. E7-5106 Filed 3-20-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
Attachment AC-99.1





Audit Committee Report







Turner Valley Oil & Gas, Inc.


6160 Genoa Bay Road Duncan


B.C. Canada V9L 5Y5


Form Type: 10-KSB


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT





The Audit Committee of Turner Valley Oil & Gas, Inc. s composed of the Corporation's Board of Directors. The members of the Committee are Christopher Paton-Gay, Donald Jackson Wells and Joseph A. Kane. The Committee recommended, subject to stockholder ratification, the selection of the Corporation's independent accountants.





Management is responsible for the Corporation's internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent accountants are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Corporation's consolidated financial statements in accordance with the generally accepted auditing standards and to issue a report thereon. The Committee's
responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.





In this context, the Committee has met and held discussions with management and the independent accountants. Management represented to the Committee that the Corporation's financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial
statements with management and the independent accountants. The Committee discussed with the independent accountants matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61.





The Corporation's independent accountants also provided to the Committee the written disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, and the Committee discussed with the independent accountant that firms independence.





Based upon Committee's discussion with management and the independent accountants and the Committee's review of the representation of management and the report of the independent accountants to the Committee, the Committee recommended that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Dated: November 30, 2008





Christopher Paton-Gay

Donald Jackson Wells

Joseph KaneChristopher Paton-Gay

Donald Jackson Wells

Joseph Kane
#### FRANK *G.*TAORMINA, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. FRANK UDDO, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

*Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, Mr. Stanley L. Bern, Mr. Alan E. Davis, Messrs. Cohen, Shapiro, Berger, Polisher & Cohen*(of the Pennsylvania Bar) and *Messrs. Friedman <& Friedman*(of the New York Bar) for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Orlando & Cummins, Mr. George R. Rohweiler*and *Messrs. Cahill, Gordon, Sonnett, Beindel & Ohl*(of the New York Bar) for the respondents.

May 28, *1968.*

Denied.
Exhibit 32


                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial  officer of First South Bancorp,  Inc., each hereby certifies that, to
the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-KSB of the issuer  fully
complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934,  and that the  information  contained in the report fairly
presents,  in all  material  aspects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

March 16, 2006
                                            s/Barry L. Slider
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Barry L. Slider
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                           s/V. Lewis Shuler
                                           ---------------------------
                                           V. Lewis Shuler
                                           Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Use of Binding Arbitration for Contract Controversies

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DON), after consultation with the 
Attorney General as required by 5 U.S.C. 575(c), has adopted a policy 
that authorizes contracting officers to use binding arbitration 
procedures for issues in controversy arising under procurement 
contracts using appropriated and non-appropriated funds.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John A. Dietrich, Assistant General 
Counsel (ADR), telephone 202-685-6990.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The policy is contained in Secretary of the 
Navy Instruction 5800.15, ``Use of Binding Arbitration for Contract 
Controversies,'' and is available on http://doni.daps.dla.mil/SECNAV.aspx and http://adr.navy.mil. The instruction provides 
interpretive guidance regarding applicable statutes and regulates the 
internal affairs of the DON by granting authority to contracting 
officers to use binding arbitration for issues in controversy.

    Dated: March 12, 2007.
M.A. Harvison,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-5031 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
VENDOR PROFILE

Note: Information is from vendor, however specifications may have 

changed. Contact vendor for updates.

Water Treatment Catalog and Decision Tool

Aqua-Pure Ventures Inc,

Fountain Quail Water Management LLC

Contact Information

Company Name: Fountain Quail (a wholly owned subsidiary of Aqua-Pure Ventures)

Profile:

Fountain Quail is a water treatment service company that utilizes AquaPure’s evaporator technology, which is covered by a process patent in 

Canada, the US, and most oil producing countries worldwide. The 

company has been treating flowback and produced water generated 

from the shale gas industry in the Barnett shale since 2005 and is 

expected to expand treatment services in the Marcellus and 

Fayetteville basins.

Address: Suite 101, 4000 Acton Highway, Granbury, TX, 76049

Phone: 817-491-8650

Website: http://www.fountainquail.com/

Treatment Technology

Category: Thermal Distillation/Evaporation

Subcategory: Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR)

Technology Name: NOMAD Mobile Evaporator

Surface Footprint Approximately 2,500 ft2

Process 

Description:

Feed water enters the evaporator, where the water streams divide and 

flow through distillate and concentrate preheat exchangers that 

recapture process heat (sensible heat) from recirculating/treated 

distillate and concentrated brine. The two flows are then recombined 

into a single stream. The feedwater then enters a recirculation loop that 

moves fluid from a separator vessel through a circulation pump to the 

evaporator exchanger and back to the separator vessel. As the steam 

moves down through the inside of the evaporator exchanger it 

condenses into distilled water. 

Feedwater TDS/

% Water Recovery

60,000 mg/L – 80,000 mg/L, approximately 85% water recovery

>80,000 mg/L- 150,000 mg/L, reduction in % water recovery

Up to 90% water recovery is possible depending on feed water quality

% Waste Stream:

Feed Capacity: Approximately 2,500 Bbls per day; 

Output: approximately 2,000 Bbls per day

Costs: Approximately $3.00 to $5.00 per bbl (includes transportation, power 

consumption, and labor); approximately $3.00 per Bbl to treat only.