alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TICTIE OFTEXAS

July 5, 1950.
Eon. Rdger Hutchins County Attorney Huntcounty Greenville, Texas opinion AO. v-1078. Re: The authority of the Comlu~ssioIlers’ court to devote the balance of proceeds of a bond issue to acquire and improve an airport to repair former airport buildings wbfch are now tb be used for county Dear Blr: fair purposes.

Your request for an opinion IS as follows :

“In 1942, Hunt County ordered abond Issue for the purpose of ‘acquiring andimproving anAir Port. @ The County acquired some 1,500 acres of land to be used as an Air Port andentered into a lease contract with.,the United States Government under the terms of which generally, the Government agreed to establish an Air Field, andit established Ha

jors Field, peragraph 12 of that contract is as shownby copy attached hereto

. Subsequent to this oontract the County andthe Government entered into two other contracts copies of whioh are attached hereto. In July 1947 the Government with the permission of Hunt County assigned its lease contract to the City of Greenville.

“The City of Greenville is willing to assign, if it has not already done so, to the HuntCounty Live Stock Assoolation, which is anon-profit organization, the use of saue five or six buildings to be used for County Fair purposes. Hunt County sold its bonds andused the funds In acquiring the real estate leased to the Government. ;zt.as some $~,OOO.OOleft with this bond

. It Is very necessary that these buildings be repaired if they are to be permanent buildings. The lease to the Government whichHon. Edgar Hutchins, page 2 (v-1.078)

;;slF6n assigned to the City expires

. The Commissioners Court wish to be informed whether it mayuse this $~,OOO.OOin repairing hese buildings andthat question is sllti4 Itted to you.It It is well settled in this State that the proceeds der$ved frap the sale of bonds must be devoted to the purpose for vhlch the bonds vere issued andno other. Lewis v. City of Fort Worth, 126 Tex. 604, 89 9.W

.2d 975 936) *Simpson v. City of Racoqdoches, 1523.W. 85 ‘(Text Civ. App. 1913, error dism.

In 1942 bonds 

### wereissued by Runt County for the purpose of “acquiring ana improving an airport for said county.” It la our opinion that the proceeds of the bond issue can only be used for that purpose andnot 

### forthe purpose of tmprovlng buildings used for County Fair purposes. Since it Is contemplated that these buildings are to be used for County PaI* purposes, It Is our oInion that the Dcmmissioners ICourt cannot expend $ g,OOO.OOof the bond proceeds for repairing these buildlngs.

Weexpress no opinion as to the authority of the county to lease the airport facilities in question to the HuntCounty Livestock Assoclatlon. SUbQilARY Proceeds of abond issue for the purpose of “aoqulrlng andimproving an airport” cannot be used to repair bulldinns to be used for Counts Fair purposes. LeGis v. CLty of Fort Worih, 126-Tek. CFtG 4 89 of iiI&ioches

2 975 (‘152

936) Civ. App. 1913, 

### err& dism.). APPROVED

: J. C. Davis, Jr. County Affairs Division Joe R. Greenhill FLrst Assistant Yours very truly, PRICI!DAHIEL Attorney General

Price Daniel Attorney General JR:mw :jmc Assistant 

### 1.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

Commission File Number: 333-85443-01

ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation issuer in respect of
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-7
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware      			363886007
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, IL 60602
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

248-643-2530
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 2000.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
2000.

Not applicable.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 21, 2014

t1118

Order 

Clerk

November 21, 2014

148767

MARIAM BAZZI, Personal Representative of

the Estate of Alexandrea Ghadia Allard,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148767

COA: 317249

Wayne CC: 13-000127-NH

INDIRA I. ONWUZURIKE, M.D., NANCY

GOLDMAN CUTLER, M.D., and WILLIAM

BEAUMONT HOSPITAL,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
No. 64927.

#### Novelty Import Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/33334, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11015-11016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-34-000]


Southwest Gas Storage Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

March 6, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 20, 2007, Southwest Gas Storage 
Company filed a cost and revenue study to comply with the Commission's 
Order Setting Complaint for Hearing, issued on December 21, 2006, in 
Docket No. RP07-34-000 (117 FERC ] 61,318 (2006)).
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a 
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.

[[Page 11016]]

    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94d2d1c6d7dbfaf8fdfaf1c7e1e4e4fbe6e0d4f2f1e6f7baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f595a4d5c50717376717a4c6a6f6f706d6b5f797a6d7c31787069">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 14, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4402 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 51472.

#### Protests 107239-K, etc., of Maryland Distillers Products Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 54719.

#### William H. Keidel *v.*United States,

protest 151955-K (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. In the protest filed by the plaintiff no statutory basis for relief was advanced, and while the facts present an unfortunate situation, the court was unable to find anything in the facts or the law which would warrant it in doing other than to overrule the protest. The protest was therefore overruled.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        Certification of CFO Pursuant to
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of Total  Luxury
Group,  Inc. (the  "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Richard B. Davis,  as Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
         in all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of
         operations of the Company.



                                                /s/ Robert Lawand
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Robert Lawand
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Date:  April 10, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4577 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4577

   To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to require the Assistant 
   Secretary for Aging to publish on an online portal information on 
 national resource centers authorized or supported under such Act, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2024

   Mr. Braun introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to require the Assistant 
   Secretary for Aging to publish on an online portal information on 
 national resource centers authorized or supported under such Act, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Senior Resource Center Transparency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ONLINE PORTAL ON NATIONAL RESOURCE CENTERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 202 of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 
U.S.C. 3012) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(j) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 
subsection, and every 180 days thereafter, the Assistant Secretary 
shall publish on an online portal--
            ``(1) a list of all national resource centers authorized or 
        supported under this Act;
            ``(2) a description of each such resource center, 
        including--
                    ``(A) the goals of the center;
                    ``(B) the population served by the center, 
                including the location of that population, by State;
                    ``(C) the number of older individuals served by the 
                center each year; and
                    ``(D) the amount and source of Federal and non-
                Federal funding the center receives each year; and
            ``(3) a description of quantitative and qualitative 
        metrics, including measures of effectiveness, that demonstrate 
        how each such center has advanced the goals described in 
        paragraph (2)(A).''.
    (b) GAO Evaluation.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall evaluate all national resource centers authorized or supported 
under the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.) for 
functions to streamline, as appropriate, and to improve the 
efficiencies of taxpayer funds.
                                 <all>
```
(V. D. 81)

#### Compass Instrument & Optical Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 843838, etc.

(Decided August 22, 1958)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

This is a valuation proceeding which arose by virtue of judgments issued by the second division of this court in the cases of *Compass Instrument & Optical Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*37 Cust. Ct. 295, Abstract 60122, and *Compass Instrument*& *Optical Co.*v. *United States,*39 Cust. Ct. 342, Abstract 60980, wherein the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement, pursuant to the provisions of title 28, U. S. C. § 2636 (d).

The parties to this proceeding have stipulated and agreed as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise consists of drawing sets and cases which were held by the Court in COMPASS INSTRUMENT & OPTICAL CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, Abstracts 60122 and 60980, to be the subject of appraisement separately according to the value of each class of articles.

> 2. That the market value or the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, was as shown on the attached schedule.

> 3. That there was no higher foreign value.

Upon the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as such value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the *458drawing instruments and cases therefor covered by the remands of protests enumerated in the schedule, attached to and forming part of this decision, and that such value is as shown in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of this decision.

I further find and hold such values to be the proper dutiable values of said merchandise.

As to all other merchandise, the remands are dismissed. ■.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) of TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT CAPITAL CORP. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, PATRICK F. CONROY, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/    PATRICK F. CONROY                 
|Name: Patrick F. Conroy Date: May 9,
2007
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William D. Eglin, Chief Financial Officer of MD Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of MD Technologies Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MD Technologies Inc.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 11, 2006 |  | /s/ William D. Eglin   
|                      |  | William D. Eglin       
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Mark Jensen, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal
Accounting Officer of MGN Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MGN Technologies,
      Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of MGN Technologies, Inc.                                                                  

Dated: August 20, 2007

|/s/ Mark
      Jensen                | 
|------------------------------------ | 
|Mark Jensen, Chief Executive Officer | 
|and Principal Accounting Officer     | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to MGN
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by MGN Technologies, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SF #1086502 v1 -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

A L

ROBERT P. BIEGLER, State Bar No. 88506 

BIEGLER, ORTIZ & CHAN LLP 

1107 9th Street, Suite 1025 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 444-3971 

Facsimile: (916) 444-3975 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

GAYDA AIRTH 

ROBERT A. DOLINKO, State Bar No. 076256 

CHRIS BAKER, State Bar No. 181557 

DEBORAH R. SCHWARTZ, State Bar No. 208934 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 371-1200 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THOMSON FINANCIAL INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GAYDA AIRTH, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

THOMSON FINANCIAL CO., INC., THE 

THOMSON CORPORATION, a Corporation, 

and DOES 1-5, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No.: CIV S-04-2536 DFL GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, 

through their undersigned counsel, that this action is dismissed with prejudice; each party shall 

bear its or his own costs and attorneys fees; and 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:04-cv-02536-DFL-GGH Document 37 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SF #1086502 v1 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

A L

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Court will retain jurisdiction 

only to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement should that become necessary.

Dated: July 10, 2006 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

By /s/ Robert A. Dolinko, Esquire

Robert A. Dolinko 

Deborah R. Schwartz 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THOMSON FINANCIAL INC. 

Dated: July 10, 2006 

BIEGLER ORTIZ & CHAN LLP 

By /s/ Robert P. Biegler, Esquire

Robert P. Biegler 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

GAYDA AIRTH 

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation, 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 25, 2006 /s/ David F. Levi_____________

United States District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-02536-DFL-GGH Document 37 Filed 07/25/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------



              Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
     As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge, the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended
September 30, 2003 of Universal Communication Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in such report.

Date:  June 29, 2004                            /s/ Michael J. Zwebner
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael J. Zwebner
                                                Chairman and
                                                Chief Executive Officer