T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. T he panel un ani m ou sl y f i nd s thi s c as e s ui t abl e f

or deci si on w i tho utoral ** ar gu m ent . F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). T he H onor abl e K e vi n T hom a s D uf f y , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJudge f orthe *** S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof

N e w Y ork, s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NO T F ORP UB L I C AT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E N IN T H C IR C U IT P A C H A Y T H A O C H E U C H I N G ; ) N o. 06- 72759 KA YING VA NG , ) ) A ge nc yN os . A 079- 587- 391 P e t i t i one r s , ) A 079- 587- 392 ) v . ) ME MORA ND UM * ) E R IC H . H O L D E R Jr . , A tt orney ) G e n e r a l, ) ) R e s p o n d e n t. ) ) P e t i t i on t o R e vi e w a n O r de rof the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r4, 2010 ** S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B e f o r e : F E RNA ND E Z a n dS I L VE R MAN, C i r c u i tJu d g e s , a n dDU F F Y, *** D i stri ctJudg e. 

# FI LED OC T 14 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSB e c au s e V an g ’s c la im is d e r iv a tiv e o f T h a o c h e u c h in g ’s c la im , w e w ill 1 d i scu ss T h ao ch eu ch i n g ’ s cl ai m , b u to u r co n cl u si o n s ap p l y eq u al l y t o h ers. 8 U . S . C . § 1158. 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 23 1(b)(3). 3 U ni t e d N a t i ons C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e a nd O the rC rue l , I nhum an or 4 D e gr a di ng T r e a tm e ntorP uni s hm e nt , a dopt e d D e c . 10, 1984, S . T r e a tyD oc . N o. 10 0– 20 (198 8), 14 65 U . N . T . S . 85 (i m pl em ent ed at8 C . F . R . § 2 08 . 18 ). 2 P a c hayT ha oc he uc hi ng and hi s w i f e K ay i ng V ang, na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of 1 L a os , pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( B I A ) de ni a l of th ei r ap p l i cat i o n s fo r asyl u m , w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al , an dC o n v en t i o n A g ai n st 2 3 T ortur e ( C A T ) r e l i e f

. W e de nythe pe t i t i on. 4 T he B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha ta n a l i e n i s note l i gi bl e f ora s y l um m us tbe uphe l d i f “ ‘ s upport e d byr e a s onabl e , s ubs t ant i a l , a nd pr oba t i ve e vi de nc e on the r e c o r dc o n s i d e r e da s aw h o l e . ’ ” I N S v . El i a s - Za c ar i a s , 5 0 2 U . S. 4 7 8 , 4 8 1 , 1 1 2 S. C t . 81 2, 81 5, 11 7 L . E d. 2d 38 (199 2). “ Itcan b e r ever se d o nl y i f the evi dence pr e s e nt e d . . . w a s s uc h tha tar e a s onabl e f a c t f i nde rw oul d ha ve t o c onc l ude tha tthe r e qui s i t e f

e arof pe r s e c ut i on e xi s t e d. ” I d. ; s e e a l s o F ar ah v. A s hc r of t , 348 F . 3d 1 1 5 3 , 1 1 5 6 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 3 ). W h en an al i en seek s t o o v ertu rn th e B IA ’ s ad v erse de t e rm i na t i on, “ he m us ts how tha tthe e vi de nc e he pr e s e nt e d w a s s o c om pe l l i ng thatno re as on abl e f

ac t fi nd ercoul d fai l t o fi nd the re qu i si t e f ear of per se cut i on . ” E lia s - Z a c ar ia s , 5 0 2 U .S . a t 4 8 3

– 8 4 , 1 1 2 S . C t. a t 8 1 7 . W h e n a n a s y lu m c la im isI n d e e d , T h a o c h e u c h in g c o n c e d e s a s m u c h b yf a ilin g to r a is e th e is s u e in h is 5 bri ef s. S ee M art i nez- S errano v. IN S , 94 F . 3d 12 56 , 12 59 –6 0 (9th C i r. 19 96 ). S ee H al i m v. H ol der, 59 0 F . 3d 97 1, 97 6– 77 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). 6 T h ao ch eu ch i n g assert s th ath i s du e p ro cess ri g h t s w ere v i o l at edb ecau se 7 th e r e w e r e e rr o r s in tr an s la tio n a t h is h e ar in g s b e f o r e th e im m ig r a tio n ju d g e . E rr or s i n tr ans l a t i on c an r e s ul ti n avi ol a t i on. S e e P e r e z - L a s t orv. I N S , 208 F . 3d 7 7 3 , 7 7 8 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 0 ) . B u tp r e j u d i c e m u s tb e s h o wn , a n dn o n e h a s b e e n s h o wn he r e . S e e G ut i e rr e z - C ha ve z v. I N S , 298 F . 3d 824, 830 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ; K ot a s z v. I N S , 31 F . 3d 847, 850 n. 2 ( 9th C i r . 1994) ; A c e w i c z v. I N S , 984 F . 2d 1056, 1063 ( 9th C i r . 1993) . S i m i l ar l y , no pr e j udi c e a r i s i ng f

r om que s t i oni ng of

V ang bythe ( c o n tin u e d ...) 3 i nvol ve d, a n a l i e n m us ts how e i the rpa s tpe r s e c ut i on oraw e l l - f ounde d f e arof future pers ec ut i on thati s “ subj ec t i vel y genui ne and o bj ec t i vel y r ea sonabl e. ” F i sh er v . IN S , 7 9 F . 3 d9 5 5 , 9 6 0 (9 th C i r. 1 9 9 6 ) (en b an c); see al so G u v . G o n zal es, 4 5 4 F .3 d1 0 1 4 , 1 0 1 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . T h a o c h e u c h in g h a s n o t m e t th a t b u r d e n . O n th e c o n tr ary , th e e v id e n c e d id notc om pe l ade t e rm i na t i on tha the w a s pe r s e c ut e d i n the pa s t . S e e S i nhav. H ol de r , 564 F . 3d 1015, 1020 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ; C ana l e s - V ar ga s v. G onz a l e s , 441 F . 3d 739, 743–44 ( 9th C i r . 2006) . N e i the rabr i e f que s t i oni ng, noral and i s s ue , nor e v e n r e p o rt s th a tth e r e w e r e th r e a t s a g a i n s th i m r i s e t o th a tl e v e l . Byth e s a me 5 t oke n, the e vi de nc e doe s notc om pe l af i ndi ng tha the ha s aw e l l - f ounde d f e arof future pers ec ut i on because of hi s a ct i vi t i es before the pres entre gi m e gai ned p ow er 6 i n L a os s om e 35 y e ar s a go. 7( . . . c ont i nue d) 7 i m m i grat i on j ud ge has been s ho w n, even tho ug h thatqu es t i on i ng m ayhave been que s t i onabl e . S e e C a m pos - S anc he z v. I N S , 164 F . 3d 448, 450 ( 9th C i r . 1999) (pre j ud i ce m ustbe show n); V i des- V i des v. IN S , 78 3 F . 2d 14 63 , 14 69 (9th C i r. 19 86 ) ( sam e) . 4 B e c aus e the B I A de t e rm i ne d tha tT ha oc he uc hi ng di d notm e e tthe r e qui r e m e nt s f

oragr antof

a s y l um , i tpr ope r l yde t e rm i ne d tha the di d notm e e tthe r e qui r e m e nt s f

orw i thhol di ng of

r e m ova l e i the r . S e e M ans ourv. A s hc r of t , 390 F .3 d6 6 7 , 6 7 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ; F is h e r , 7 9 F .3 da t 9 6 0

– 6 1 , 9 6 5 . F in a lly , th e e v id e n c e in th e r e c o r dd o e s n o t c o m p e l ad e te rm in a tio n th a t it is m o r e lik e lyth an n o t th a t T h a o c h e u c h in g w o u ldb e to rtu r e din L a o s . T h u s , h e is n o t e n title dto C A T r e lie f . S e e W a k k aryv . H o ld e r , 5 5 8 F .3 d1 0 4 9 , 1 0 6 7

– 6 8 ( 9 th C i r. 20 09 ); S i ng h v . G on za l es , 43 9 F . 3d 11 00 , 11 13 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). P e t i t i o n DE NI E D.