alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Honorable Sandra S. Beckwith, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the *

Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 07a0584n.06

Filed: August 14, 2007

No. 06-2330

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

CYNTHIA MAYFIELD, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY.

Defendant-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Before: GIBBONS and SUTTON, Circuit Judges; and BECKWITH, District Judge*

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-appellant Cynthia Mae Mayfield filed an application for Social

Security disability benefits on March 28, 2001, alleging that she became disabled in June 1999 as

the result of an automobile accident. In October 2004, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found

that Mayfield was not entitled to disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act.

Mayfield sought review of the Commissioner’s final decision in federal district court. The district

court granted the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, and Mayfield appealed. 

 The question before this court is only whether substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s

decision to deny Mayfield Social Security benefits. The ALJ’s conclusion is not subject to reversal

merely because evidence exists in the record that could support a different conclusion. Mullen v.
Bowen, 800 F.2d 535, 545 (6th Cir. 1986). With very limited exception, the diagnostic and objective

medical evidence shows no abnormalities and therefore does not support Mayfield’s treating

physicians’ conclusion that she is totally and permanently disabled. As a consequence, the ALJ’s

decision not to give these opinions controlling weight was not in error. Read in its entirety, the

record confirms that substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Mayfield is not entitled to

disability benefits for the relevant period. Because a panel opinion further addressing the issues

raised would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary

judgment to the Commissioner on the grounds identified by that court.
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Wayne
F. Irmiter, Vice President and Controller of CE Generation, LLC (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the
best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    
    the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
      December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.Dated:
    February
      25, 2005
 
 
 /s/
Wayne F. Irmiter
 Wayne F.
Irmiter
 Vice
President and Controller
 (chief
accounting officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5725] 

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app 2 § 10(a)(2), the Department of State announces a meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) to take place on April 25, 2007, at the Department of State, Washington, DC. 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app 2 § 10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been determined that this Board meeting will be closed to the public in the interest of national defense and foreign policy because the Board will be reviewing and discussing matters classified in accordance with Executive Order 12958. 

                    The purpose of the ISAB is to provide the Department with a continuing source of independent advice on all aspects of arms control, disarmament and international security, and related aspects of public diplomacy. The agenda for this meeting includes classified discussions related to the Board's ongoing studies on current U.S. policy and issues regarding nuclear proliferation, space policy, and related aspects of public diplomacy.                           ( print page 13157)    

For more information, contact Matthew Zartman, Deputy Executive Director of the International Security Advisory Board, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 736-4244. 

Dated: March 2, 2007. 

George W. Look, 

Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board,  Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E7-5023 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
# C_2007075EN.01000601.xml

| 3.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/6

---

Notification by Romania concerning visa reciprocity (1)

1

(2007/C 75/04)

In accordance with Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 851 of 2 June 2005 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of the Member States and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, Romania would inform you, in connection with the reciprocity mechanism, that the following third countries impose a visa requirement on Romanian nationals: Australia, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, United States of America, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Panama, Paraguay.

---

(1)  This notification is published in conformity with Article 2 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 (OJ L 141, 4.6.2005, p. 3) amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 (OJ L 81, 21.3.2001, p. 1).

1

---
#### Debby Ann Curtis, *Respondent, v.*Martin Briggs, Appellant.

.Judgment affirmed on opinion of referee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent, No. CR S-04-0075 WBS PAN (JFM) P

vs.

PATRICK J. SAHLI,

Movant. ORDER

 /

Movant, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion to vacate, set

aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 8, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-01765-WBS-PAN Document 1 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 8, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Movant’s August 25, 2004 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the companion civil case, No. CIV.

S-04-1765 WBS EFB P.

DATED: September 21, 2006

/sahl0075.vac

Case 2:04-cv-01765-WBS-PAN Document 1 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 53595.

petition 6679-R (Galveston).

#### Harry Hawley, an individual dba Hawley & Letzerich *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The petitioner testified that prior to entry he showed all papers in his possession to the appraiser, requesting that if customs officials *180learned of a higher price than the invoice values at which entry was made, that petitioner be permitted to amend the entry. Investigation by the customs officials disclosed higher values and petitioner amended the entry to meet the “horizontal1 advance of 2J4 per centum,” suggested by the appraiser. At the time of liquidation, however, it was revealed that the increase in value on some of the items exceeded the blanket advance of 2J4 percent made by the petitioner in the amended entry. From the entire record it was held that the entry of the merchandise at a less value than that found by the appraiser was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
#### Geo. Burchall vs. Snow *Jolly Batchelor*and Cargo

20th Augs* 1743.

The Court being Opened According to Adjournment

His Honr the Judge Pronounced his Decree

[Minute Book, 1740-1743]

I have considered the Lible of George Burchill Residing at the Banana Islands on the Coast of Guinea in Africa Mercht against the Snow Jolly Batchelor Jn° Cutler Late Commander and her Cargoe etc. and I do Adjudge and Decree to him the one third part of the Aforesaid Snow and Appurtenances and One third part of the twenty Negros Mentioned in the Lible free of all Charges or Deductions for Salvage the Aforeside Snow and Negroes I order to be Appris4 on oath by Benj. Cranston Patrick Grant and Tho: Vernon and to be Sold at Publick Vandue by Will King Deputy Marshall of this Court on the thirtyth of the Instant Aug* at the House of Mr. Jacob Hassy and I order the s4 Will King to pay the one Whole third therof to George Burchall or to his Lawfull Attorney the other two thirds after all Charges are first subducted and tax4 by me I order the s4 Will King to pay to Benj. Furnel of Boston Esq. and to Mr Jn° Jones Mercht Aforeside Assoon as Demanded by them the Portage Bill in this Case I Reject.

Jn° Gridley Judge

[Admiralty Papers, II, 25]

Burchell etc. vs 1 Snow Jolly Batchelor J Cost of Court

For Drawing the Libel and Attorneys Fee *£*o / 18 / 8

For filing and allowing / 12 /. 8

To Attachment Seal and Service / 10 /

To the Marshalls Fee / 2 / 6

To three Interrogatory Decree and recorB 2 / 11 / 6

To Taking 4 Evidences In Court / 6 /

Toa Coppy of the Libel / 2 / 6

To the Marshall for keeping the Vessell in Custody 19 Days 2 / 7 / 6

To the Marshall for Selling S4 Snow and Twenty Negroes @ 2J per Cent 18 / 5. / 6

*234To the Regr for paying and receiving D° at per Cent 18 / 5/6

To the Doorkeeper etc. / 4/6

To Drawing Bill of Cost taxing etc. / 5 /

To Decree Definitive and recording 1/12/10

£4-6 / 2 / 8

_4_

Jn° Gidley Judge £184 / 10 / 8

[Admiralty Papers, II, 14]
No. 66842.

#### Texas Meat Packers Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/18185 (Galveston).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mutton similar in all material respects to the beef the subject of *United States*v. *J. H. Brown et al.*(46 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 686), except that the merchandise here involved is mutton, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J uly 30, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 9- 10 25 8 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 0 8- 00 26 8- CR-2 -KOB-RRA UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A,
Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,
ve rs us JESS E CRAIG MC KINNEY, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ctof Al ab am a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (J ul y 30 , 20 09 ) Befo re DUBINA, Ch ie f Ju dg e, MARC US an d ANDERSON, Ci rcu itJu dg es .PER CURI AM:

Ali so n Wall ace, app oi nt edco un se l fo r Je ss e Cra ig McKi nn ey in th is di rect cri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m fur th er re pr es en ta ti on an d fi le d a br ie f pu rs ua ntto And

er s v. C al if or ni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2 d 4 93 (19 67 ). Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdco nf irms th at th ere a re n o i ss ue s o f arg uabl e m eri t o n app eal . There fo re, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wit hd raw i s GRANTED , andMcKi nn ey ’s con vi ct io ns an d s en te nc es are AFFIRMED
.

2
No. 44055.

#### Protest 984394-G of Simon, Healey & Goldstein, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The evidence offered clearly established that the merchandise consists of mufflers. On the record presented the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 was sustained.
SCWC-18-0000630

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

________________________________________________________________

DL, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

CL, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000630; FC-D NO. 16-1-1014)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant DL’s application for writ of 

certiorari filed on January 28, 2020, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard 

in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to 

Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for 

retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, March 5, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000630

05-MAR-2020

11:43 AM
Exhibit 10.16


 


This Assignment and Assumption of Leases and Security Deposits (“Assignment”) is entered
into as of the 16th day of March, 2015.


  






    	1



    	 



    

 


 






    	2



    	 



    

 


 






    	3



    	 



    

 


 






    	4



    	 



    

 


 






    	5



    	 



    

 


 






    	6
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4854 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4854

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the annual report on 
          privatized military housing, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2024

 Mr. Warnock (for himself and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the annual report on 
          privatized military housing, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Housing Performance Insight 
Act'' or the ``MHPI Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON PRIVATIZED MILITARY HOUSING.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 2884 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraphs:
            ``(15) An overview of the housing data being used by the 
        Department and the housing data being sought from management 
        companies.
            ``(16) An assessment of how the Secretary of each military 
        department is using such data to inform the on-base housing 
        decisions for such military department.
            ``(17) An explanation of the limitations of any customer 
        satisfaction data collected, including with respect to 
        available survey data, the process for determining resident 
        satisfaction, and reasons for missing data.''.
    (b) Public Reporting.--Such subsection is further amended--
            (1) in paragraph (14), by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 
        through (D) as clauses (i) through (iv), respectively;
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (17) as 
        subparagraphs (A) through (Q), respectively;
            (3) in subparagraph (E), as redesignated by paragraph (2), 
        by striking ``paragraphs (1) through (4)'' and inserting 
        ``subparagraphs (A) through (D)'';
            (4) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), as so 
        redesignated, by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting ``(1) 
        The Secretary''; and
            (5) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) Not later than 30 days after submitting a report under 
paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall publish the report on a 
publicly available website of the Department of Defense.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (d)(1) of such section is 
amended by striking ``paragraphs (1) through (14) of subsection (c)'' 
and inserting ``subparagraphs (A) through (Q) of subsection (c)(1)''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Mason, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 406]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated July 31, 1989 *(People v Mason,*152 AD2d 750), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered September 17,1986, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien and Thompson, JJ., concur.
<page>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of AcuNetx, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


Date:    April 24, 2009


                                               By: /s/ Robert S. Corrigan
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   Robert S. Corrigan,
                                                   President and Chief Executive
                                                   Officer

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "FILED" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

             CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 16 - GLOBAL INCORPORATED

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corporate Property Associates
16-Global Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Claude Fernandez, acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Claude Fernandez
    -----------------------
    Claude Fernandez
    acting Chief Financial Officer

           5/10/2005
    -----------------------
    Date

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.