alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TOWN OF WEST NEW YORK, APPELLANT-PETITIONER, v. HARRY BOCK, *ET AL.,*RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

See same case below: 71 *N. J. Super.*143.

*Mr. Samuel L. Hirschberg*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. O'ohen and Turtz*for the respondent.

April 3, 1962.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William D. Eglin, Chief Executive Officer of MD Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of MD Technologies Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MD Technologies Inc.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 11, 2006 |  | /s/ William D. Eglin   
|                      |  | William D. Eglin       
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
EX-32 CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO

EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ViaStar Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") as of the date hereof, I, John D. Aquilino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, George J. Malasek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to the best of our knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ JOHN D. AQUILINO                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|John D. Aquilino
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



Dated: November 24, 2003



|/s/ GEORGE J. MALASEK                                                                 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|George J. Malasek
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



Dated: November 24, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or other documentation authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to ViaStar Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by ViaStar Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification "accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ViaStar Holdings, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB, irrespective of a general incorporation of language contained in such filing).
No. 60869.

#### Gramercy Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 300622-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
#### Commonwealth *v.*Howells, Appellant.

Submitted May 20, 1968.

Before Bell, C. J., Mtrsmanno, Jones, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.

*619
      *John Allan Howells,*appellant, in propria persona.

*Jerome T. Foerster,*Assistant District Attorney, and *LeRoy S. Zimmerman,*District Attorney, for appellee.

October 11, 1968:

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

Order affirmed.

Mr. Justice Musmanno did not participate in the decision of this case.

Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts:

Appellant pleaded guilty to murder in 1946 and was sentenced to life imprisonment. In November, 1966 he filed a petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act in which he set forth numerous grounds for relief. Howells alleged, inter alia, that a confession had been coerced by virtue of the fact that he was only fourteen years of age in 1946 *(with a mental age later found to be about ten or eleven),*yet was not permitted even to call his mother from the police station until he had made a statement. Appellant also alleged that this confession motivated his guilty plea, and that in no event was his mental condition sufficient to justify the trial court’s acceptance of this plea. The court below dismissed appellant’s petition without holding an evidentiary hearing, and the majority today affirms that dismissal “per curiam.” Because I believe that Howells is entitled to an evidentiary hearing, I dissent.

Section 9 of the Post Conviction Hearing Act specifically requires that the court hold an evidentiary *620hearing whenever a petitioner alleges facts which, if true, would support the grant of relief. Although this rule does not apply in cases where the allegations are patently frivolous and without any trace of support in the record or in other evidence submitted by the petitioner, such is clearly not the case here. Appellant’s allegations are serious and at least supported by the facts alleged in his petition and the brief submitted to this Court. Accordingly, he must be afforded an opportunity to prove his allegations. I would vacate the order of the court below and remand for a hearing. *Commonwealth v. Patterson,*432 Pa. 76, 247 A. 2d 218 (1968); *Commonwealth ex rel. West v. Myers,*423 Pa. 1, 222 A. 2d 918 (1966). Compare, American Bar Association Project on Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice, Post-Conviction Remedies, p. 15, §4.3 (e) with *Id.*§4.5(a).

I dissent.
#### ANNA A. BRUNI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued January 22, 1968

Decided April 1, 1968.

*409
      *Mr. Frank Thatcher*argued the cause for appellant *(Mr. Joseph B. Moss,*attorney).

*Mr. Samuel Kalikman*argued the cause for respondent *(Mr. George D. Rothermel,*attorney).

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Carton in the Appellate Division, 100 *N. J. Super.*154.

*410
      *For reversal*— Chief Justice Weintratjb and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Sci-iettino and Haneman—7.

*For affirmance*— None.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Labonte,
Inc. for the quarter Ended March 31, 2004, I, Bernie McGinn, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Labonte, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Labonte, Inc.


Dated:  May 17, 2004


LABONTE, INC.

By: /s/ Bernie McGinn
---------------------------
Bernie McGinn
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Joseph P. Durrett, certify that:

 

1.   Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Information Resources, Inc.Litigation Contingent Payment Rights Trust;

 

2.   Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)    Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| /s/ JOSEPH P. DURRETT  |   |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------|
| Joseph P. Durrett      |   |
| Litigation Trustee     |   |
| November 12, 2004 |   |

 

----
No. 57347.

protest 198634-K (New York).

#### The Norport Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
Amended and Restated Director 2013 Long Term Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 

First Amendment to the WCI Communities, Inc. 

Amended and Restated Director 2013 Long Term Incentive Plan 

This First Amendment to the WCI Communities, Inc. Amended and Restated Director 2013 Long Term Incentive Plan (this
“Amendment”) is adopted as of September 22, 2016 (the “Amendment Date”) by WCI Communities, Inc. (the “Company”) for the purpose of amending the WCI Communities, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013
Director Long Term Incentive Plan (as it may be amended from time to time, the “Plan”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 

WHEREAS, the Company currently maintains the Plan; 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan pursuant to Article 9 of the Plan; and 

WHEREAS, this Amendment, together with the Plan (as of immediately prior to the Amendment Date), constitutes the entire Plan as amended
through the Amendment Date. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the Amendment Date, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Section 8.3 of the Plan is hereby removed and replaced in its entirety with the following: 

8.3 Form of Payment. Payment of LTIP Awards may be made in shares of Common Stock; provided, however, in the event the Payment
Event is due to a Change in Control of WCI, (a) pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger between WCI and Lennar Corporation dated as of September 22, 2016 (the “Lennar MA”), payment shall be made as set forth
under the terms of the Lennar MA applicable to the treatment of LTIP Awards, or (b) other than pursuant to the Lennar MA, payment shall be made in cash based on the value of shares of Common Stock for purposes of calculation of consideration in
such Change in Control (as determined by the Committee in its discretion). 
 2. Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms. 
 3. This Amendment shall be construed and enforced in accordance with and governed by the
laws of the State of Florida. 
 * * * * * 







 Executed and effective as of the Amendment Date. 

 

			
	WCI COMMUNITIES, INC.
	
	 /s/ Keith Bass

		
	By:	 	Keith Bass
		
	Its:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer


 Signature Page to First Amendment to the WCI Communities, Inc. 

Amended and Restated 2013 Director Long Term Incentive Plan
No. 60912.

#### Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc., and Oxford University Press, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 174704-K and 283814-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the books are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60405, the items entered for consumption prior to January 1, 1948, were held dutiable at 7% percent under paragraph 1410, as modified by T. D. 49753, and the items entered on or after said date were held dutiable at 5 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 16  GLOBAL INCORPORATED
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based
on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/ Gordon F. DuGan

Gordon F. DuGan
Chief Executive Officer
(Reap. Dec. 10478)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 829502.

(Decided April 8, 1963)

*Broolcs & Broolcs for*the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement for decision upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the tires, imported from Holland, here involved.

On the basis of the said stipulation, I find the export value of merchandise to be as follows:

(1) As to the merchandise identified on the invoice as 246 tires, 20 by 1.75 black, US $49.20 per 100 tires, net, packed.

(2) As to the items identified on the invoice as 8,000 tires, 26 by 1.75 black, US $61.89 per 100 tires, net, packed.

*437(3) As to the items identified on the invoice as 8,000 tires, 26 by 1.75 whitewall, US $78.02 per 100 tires, net, packed.

(4) As to the remainder of the merchandise specified on the invoice, invoiced unit prices, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Southern Star Central Corp.

Southern Star Central Gas PIpeline, Inc.

4700 Highway 56

Owensboro, KY 42301



May 10, 2010



Chris W. Ellison

7 Bluegrass Court

Hesston, KS 67062



Dear Chris:



This letter is being presented for your consideration as respects the current Employment Agreement Agreement between Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc. (SSCGP), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Star Central Corp. (Company) and you, Chris W. Ellison, named Executive dated August 11, 2005, as amended January 1, 2009.



Pursuant to paragraph 4(a) of the original Agreement, dated August 11, 2005, language provides for its expiration concurrent with the fifth anniversary from that date, or August 11, 2010. SSCGP and Company desire to extend said Agreement until December 31, 2010.  The Agreement will expire at midnight December 31, 2010 without prior notice being required of either SSCGP and Company, or Executive.



SSCGP and Company will be in the process of reviewing potential employment terms of all SSCGP Officers beyond that date.



If the above terms are acceptable to you, please execute in the space provided below and return to Rob Carlton, Vice President, Human Resources by close of business May 13, 2010.  Otherwise, the existing Agreement terminates on August 11, 2010.



SOUTHERN STAR CENTRAL CORP.



/s/ Beverly H. Griffith

Beverly H. Griffith



SOUTHERN STAR CENTRAL GAS PIPELINE, INC



/s/ Robert W. Carlton

Robert W. Carlton

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:



/s/ Chris W. Ellison

Chris W. Ellison

Date:  5/13/2010



# Endnotes





Exhibit 10.31
SNAP Delisting Proposal

Association of Home Appliance Manufactur

June 3, 2015
1

Background

Appliance manufacturers are well on theto transitioning away from these productvoluntarilyThe energy efficiency benefits of HFC-bafoam-blowing agents far outweigh their lenvironmental impactsThe phaseout timeline in the delisting prunnecessarily expedites a transition that occur by 2020 anyway
2

Appliance Manufacturer Concerns

The purported benefits of the rule are baon old data and are overstatedThe costs of the final stages of the transaway from HFCs will be significantThe 2017 deadline is very disruptive, limflexibility and could adversely impact proBetter coordination is needed between Eand DOE on related rulemakings
3

Industry Move from HFCs Well Und

EPA underestimated the state of the appindustry’s transition away from HFCs as fblowing agents

EPA: 39% in 2014, 1% annual increase (BAHAM: 62% in 2015, 72% in 2018, 100% 

EPA overestimated the emissions that wavoided under its proposal (2017-2020)

EPA: 60 MMtCO2eqAHAM: 16 MMtCO2eq
4

Projections for HFC Use: BAU and 
5

Putting Appliance Emissions in Con

EPA projects that total emissions avoide2020 under the proposal will be 31-42 MMtCO2eqRefrigerator portion of emissions avoide2020

EPA: 0.72 MMtCO2eq (2.3%)AHAM: 0.15 MMtCO2eq (0.5%)

Appliances represent a very small fractiothe total potential for emissions reduction
6

Proposal’s Impact on Manufacturers

The transition from ozone depleting substances to CFCs to HCFCs to HFCalready been very costlyRemaining transition is complex, costl

Re-engineering manufacturing operatioRedesign of products18-month transition severely limits choFew alternatives available; no drop-insEfficiency penalty for switch to HCs or 
7

Unnecessary EPA/DOE Misalignme

DOE’s next efficiency standard for refrigeratexpected in 2020

Most recent standard effective in September Extensive product testing and certification reqto qualify under new standards

Manufacturers align product research and development cycles around DOE’s schedule

Proposed 2017 deadline limits options

Early transition would require:

Major capital investments ahead of scheduleMassive coordination effort with suppliersRecertification of all models to Sept. 2014 staRe-flooring of display models (est. $1M per m
8

Industry Recommendations

Extend the compliance deadline for eHFC use in FBAs to 2020 to align with next DOE efficiency standardSecure win-win for Administration, EPindustry and environment

Major industry segment can support fiEPA can applaud industry progress
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES THOMAS KOSKINAS, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Peter Murray, Mr. Richard Newman*and *Mr. Michael Blacker*for the petitioner.

*Mr. A. Donald Bigley*and *Mr. Robert Messiah*for the respondent.

February 27, 1968.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 33-31236) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Plan and the Directors’Stock Option Plan of Hotel Reservations Network, Inc. of 1) our report datedJanuary 25, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofHotel Reservations Network, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000and the period from May 11, 1999 through December 31, 1999 and 2) our reportdated November 22, 1999 with respect to the combined financial statements ofTMF, Inc. (d/b/a Hotel Reservations Network) and HRN Marketing Corp. for theperiod from January 1, 1999 through May 10, 1999, both of which are included inthis Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2013 

# Order

Clerk 

### October 29, 2013

145594(2 7 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MIC HIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 145594

v COA: 307728

Wayne CC: 1995

- 003838

- FH

WILLIAM CRAIG GARRETT,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

____________________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Innocence Clinic and

the American Civil Liberties Union to file an amicus curiae brief is GRANTED. The

amicus curiae brief submitted on October 24, 2013, is accepted for filing.