alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 51 (Friday, March 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4808]



[[Page 12603]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL05-25-003, EL05-26-003, EL05-27-003]


Southern Company Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

March 12, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 5, 2007 Southern Company Services, Inc 
for itself and as agent for Alabama Power Company and Georgia Power 
Company filed a compliance report pursuant to the Commission's January 
19, 2007 Order.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92d4d7c0d1ddfcfefbfcf7c1e7e2e2fde0e6d2f4f7e0f1bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="05434057464a6b696c6b60567075756a777145636077662b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 26, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4808 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
446 A.2d 680

#### Commonwealth v. Mace, Appellant.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied Aug. 13, 1982.

Argued June 24, 1981.

Samuel K. Gates, for appellant; William A. Behe, Deputy District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, JOHNSON and SHERTZ, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

SHERTZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
No. 52343.

protests 984207-G, etc. (New York).

#### Stern *&*Stern Textile Importers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

P 
to suoh foroes the ihoilltles of S~tate alniorlee and 

their bqulgatant am? auof: other ?tete prtsnlees and property 

RPI .may be available. Authorization Is hereby provided 

for eohool authoritleo to pennIt the 1180 of sohool 

! It therefore follow8 Wmt your first question 8houl.d 

bo anmsred In the aff%zmatlve and It I.6 so tmswemd. 

Wnlon no. a-m32 or thie dbpartmttnt hohih that 

thb ~orp;ni8SiOXUBl7S' eOlWt IBaJ' h&lJ @lll@.Oy tl OOUUty bomb 

dwmnstratlon agent and pay her a salary, awm tAou#h no 

provfJion wa8 sad6 for mme in the aounty budget, if the 

Conmiasinnex%* Court menda the budget to take oare of muab 

P and makes a feat deteminatlon thet t.Ve 58 a oaaic) of Hgra~e 

@diic JlMtWiIity to mbOt UnUEUd. Md UMfOX'W8bR OO~itiOM 

I 

,, WhLOh oolllu net ,bY :~.x~aasl?~~,~atllgent QhDu&ht anu attenuell .,., 

~havb been iMdi&& bl thr'or"lginal budget." Vi. bIMlQ#le hwdth 

a oopy of &raid opUle& 

In enswbr to your 8ooom3 question you am respeotfully 

advlssd that It is the opinion of tLls deparfmmt that if the 

C&wnlaelonerr* Court dbtermlned that the nnatter tnquired about 

cae 8 oaee of '*grave publio ~neoeasity to met unusual and 

unformesn ooadltione whioh oould not, by rtmuonably Uillgent 

thought end attention, httTb been inoluded in the origkml 

buLget* the oourt would have authority to Bmend the budceat 

M& eid t&9 Texas B3feruta Guard. 

Very truly youns 

J.moRmr ss;zi!& o? Tri&:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flatbush Federal Bancorp,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Jesus R. Adia, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John
S. Lotardo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



The purpose of this statement is solely to
comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.



|                      |  | /s/ Jesus R. Adia           
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                      |  | Jesus R. Adia               
|                      |  | President and               
|                      |  | Chief Executive
Officer     
|                      |  |                             
|                      |  | /s/ John S. Lotardo         
|                      |  | John S. Lotardo             
|                      |  | Executive Vice President
and
|                      |  | Chief Financial
Officer     
|                      |  |                             
|Date: August 14, 2012 |  |                             









45



---
21. Subsidiaries of the registrant





WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES





Keithley International Investment Corporation


28775 Aurora Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44139,
U.S.A.





Keithley Foreign Sales Corporation


5 Norre Gade, Charlotte Amalie


St. Thomas,
U.S. Virgin Islands 00801





FRANCE:  Keithley Instruments SARL


3 Allee des Garays


91127 Palaiseau Cedex





GERMANY:  Keithley Instruments GmbH


Landsberger Strasse 65


82110 Germering (Munich)





GREAT BRITAIN:  Keithley Instruments Ltd.


Unit 2 Commerce Park, Brunel Road


Theale, Berkshire RG7 4AB





ITALY:  Keithley Instruments SRL


Viale San Gimignano 38


20146 Milano





JAPAN:  Keithley Instruments KK


New Pier Takeshiba North Tower 13F


11-1, Kaigan 1-chome


Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0022





NETHERLANDS:  Keithley Instruments BV


Postbus 559


4200 AN Gorinchem (Amsterdam)
No. 55981.

protests 169680-K, etc. (New York).

#### Abraham *&*Straus, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Case No. 9,812.

#### MORGAN v. VOSS.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 134.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1803.

Continuance — Deposition not Retukned— Affidavit.

The court will not continue the cause because a commission to examine a witness is not returned, unless the materiality of the witness be shown by affidavit. - —

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

Commission to Virginia, issued March, 1802. New commission ordered July, 1802. Issued September. 1802. Interrogatories filed December, 1802.

Motion by P. B. Key, for the defendant, to continue the cause for want of a return of the commission. No affidavit of the materiality of the witness. Refused.

[See Case No. 9,811.)
Exhibit
2.1.2




MUTUAL
NOTICE OF EXTENSION




This Mutual Notice of Extension (the
“Notice”) is provided as of January 31, 2008, by and among Black Hills
Corporation, a South Dakota corporation (“Black Hills”),
Aquila, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Aquila”), and Great
Plains Energy Incorporated, a Missouri corporation (“Great
Plains”).




Background




The parties have entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement), an Asset Purchase Agreement
(“APA”) and a Partnership Interests Purchase Agreement (“PIPA”), each dated
February 6, 2007.  These agreements provide that each of them may be
terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time (as defined in the
agreements) if, among other things, the transactions contemplated by the
agreements have not been consummated by the first anniversary of the agreements
(the “Termination Date”).  The agreements further provide that either
Aquila or Great Plains may extend the Termination Date of the Merger Agreement,
and either Aquila or Black Hills may extend the Termination Date of the APA and
PIPA, from time to time up to a date not beyond 18 months after the dates of the
agreements, if any of them determines that additional time is necessary to
obtain any of the Material Company Regulatory Consents or the Material Parent
Regulatory Consents (as defined in the Merger Agreement), or the Required
Regulatory Approvals (as defined in the APA and PIPA).




Each of
the parties has determined that additional time is necessary to obtain the
Material Company Regulatory Consents, the Material Parent Regulatory Consents
and the Required Regulatory Approvals, and each desires to initially extend the
Termination Dates of the Merger Agreement, APA and PIPA.




Mutual
Notice of Extension




Each of
Aquila and Great Plains hereby provides written notice to the other, pursuant to
Section 9.2 of the Merger Agreement, that the Termination Date, as defined in
that agreement, is hereby initially extended to May 1, 2008.




Each of
Black Hills and Aquila hereby provides written notice to the other and to Great
Plains, pursuant to Sections 10.1(b) of the APA and the PIPA, that the
Termination Date, as defined in those agreements, is hereby initially extended
to May 1, 2008.




[signature
page follows]




1-LA/975924.1


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Mutual Notice of Extension has been duly executed and
delivered by the duly authorized officers of the parties as of the date first
written above.









BLACK
HILLS CORPORATION





By:
            /s/
      Steve J. HelmersName:
            Steven
      J. HelmersTitle:
            Senior
      Vice President and General Counsel








GREAT
PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED





By:
            /s/
      Terry BasshamName:
            Terry
      BasshamTitle:
            Executive
      Vice President – Finance and Strategic
              Development
      and Chief Financial Officer








AQUILA,
INC.





By:
            /s/
      Christopher M. ReitzName:
            Christopher
      M. ReitzTitle:
            Senior
      Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

JOSEPH L. DEXTER and SHIRLEY

A. DEXTER,

NO. CIV. S 04-2643 MCE JFM

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER

FORWARD AIR, INC., a Tennessee

corporation, STARWOOD HOTELS

AND RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC., a

Maryland corporation, and THE

HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware

corporation,

Defendants.

and

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, GALLAGHER BASSETT

SERVICES, INC., and NATIONAL UNION FIRE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Applicants for Intervention. 

----oo0oo----

Through the present action, Plaintiff Joseph Dexter

Case 2:04-cv-02643-MCE -JFM Document 37 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mr. Dexter’s wife, Shirley A. Dexter, is also a named 1

Plaintiff and seeks loss of consortium damages as a result of her

husband’s injuries.

Because oral argument would not be of material assistance, 2

this matter was deemed suitable for decision without oral

argument. E.D. Local Rule 78-230(h).

2

(“Plaintiff”) seeks damages for personal injuries allegedly 1

sustained while in the course and scope of his employment with

Continental Airlines. Jurisdiction is premised on diversity of

citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Continental Airlines,

Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., and National Union Fire

Insurance Company (“Applicants for Intervention”) now move to

intervene in Plaintiff’s lawsuit against the entities allegedly

responsible for the motor vehicle accident as a result of which

Plaintiff claims to have been injured. Applicants for

Intervention seek to recover workers’ compensation benefits paid

to Plaintiff following the accident, and propose to file a

Complaint in Intervention on that basis.

No opposition having been filed to Applicants’ request, and

good cause appearing therefore, the Motion for Leave to File a

Complaint in Intervention is GRANTED. Applicants for 2

Intervention are directed to serve and file their proposed

Complaint in Intervention within thirty (30) days from the date

of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 26, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-02643-MCE -JFM Document 37 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02643-MCE -JFM Document 37 Filed 10/27/05 Page 3 of 3
(Reap. Dec. 9528)

#### Pablo Adler *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 914454; 736830; 722251.

(Decided October 29, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Gochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*trial attorney), for tbe defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

These are appeals for reappraisement of the value of certain rubber goods exported from England in June and July 1953. The appeals were consolidated for the purpose of trial together.

The merchandise was entered at the invoice value of *1*shillings per gross, less charges for cartage, freight, and insurance, and less *3%*per centum cash discount. It was appraised at 9 shillings, 6 pence, per gross, less *3%*per centum, packed.

When the cases were called for trial, it appeared that the business arrangements for the purchase of merchandise such as that at bar had been made 2 or 3 years before the present importations, and that the invoiced price was the price established at that time and was the price paid by the importer in the case of all subsequent importations, including the present shipments.

It also appeared, however, that the plaintiff was unable to establish the market value of such or similar merchandise at or about the time of exportation of the shipments covered by these cases, i.e., in June and July 1953, or, in any event, to establish that the earlier price had not changed.

On the record presented, I have no other course than to hold that inasmuch as the plaintiff has failed to establish a value for the merchandise other than that returned by the appraiser, by operation of the statutory presumption attaching to the value returned by the appraiser (section 2633, title 28, U.S. Code), the value of the merchandise at bar is that found by the appraiser.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1

         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, John R. Signorello, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of IceWEB, Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2004:

         1. That such report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. That information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of IceWEB, Inc.

November 14, 2005                 By: /s/ John R. Signorello
                                      ----------------------
                                      John R. Signorello, CEO,
                                      principal executive officer and
                                      principal financial and accounting officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of East Coast Diversified Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2004 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Richard Margulies, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Richard Margulies

Richard MarguliesChief Executive OfficerDated: May 3, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to East Coast Diversified Corporationand will be retained by East Coast Diversified Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 51036.

#### Protests 59524-K, etc., of Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bottles produced by automatic machine the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 201, C. A. D. 307). In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 218 (e) was sustained.
#### LOWA, LTD., Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

Appeal No. 83-1018.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1984.

Andrew P. Vance, New York City, submitted for appellant. With him on brief were Leonard Lehman, John J. Galvin, New York City, John E. Corette, III, and Daniel Webster, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

J. Paul McGrath, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney in Charge International Trade Field Office, Washington, D.C., and Barbara M. Epstein, New York City, submitted for ap-pellee.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, BENNETT, Circuit Judge and COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) dismissing for lack of jurisdiction. We *affirm.*

OPINION

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the CIT. *Lowa, Ltd. v. United States,*561 F.Supp. 441 (C.I.T.1983).

AFFIRMED.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4831 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to include peer supports as 

a supportive service within the National Family Caregiver Support Program, to require States to consider the unique needs of caregivers whose 

families have been impacted by substance use disorder, including opioid 

use disorder, in providing services under such program, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2024 

Mr. BUDD (for himself and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to include peer 

supports as a supportive service within the National 

Family Caregiver Support Program, to require States 

to consider the unique needs of caregivers whose families 

have been impacted by substance use disorder, including 

opioid use disorder, in providing services under such 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Families Care Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4831 IS

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL FAMILY CAREGIVER SUPPORT PRO2 GRAM. 

3 Section 373 of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 

4 U.S.C. 3030s–1) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting ‘‘peer sup6 ports,’’ after ‘‘individual counseling,’’; 

7 (2) in subsection (c)— 

8 (A) in the subsection heading, by striking 

9 ‘‘Priority’’ and inserting ‘‘Priority; Consider10 ation’’; and 

11 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(3) CONSIDERATION.—In providing services 

13 under this part, the State shall consider the cir14 cumstances and unique needs of different types of 

15 caregivers, including the needs of children and their 

16 older relative caregivers whose families have been af17 fected by substance use disorder, including opioid 

18 use disorder.’’; and 

19 (3) in subsection (e)— 

20 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

21 by striking ‘‘Not later than’’ and all that fol22 lows through ‘‘the Assistant Secretary shall’’ 

23 and inserting ‘‘The Assistant Secretary shall, 

24 on a regular basis’’; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4831 IS

1 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘make 

2 available’’ and inserting ‘‘prepare, publish, and 

3 disseminate’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS