alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp.
(the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/ PATRICK F. CONROY                      
|Name: Patrick F. Conroy
Date:   May 7, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The CNO Executive Panel will report on the findings and recommendations of the Deterrence and Escalation Subcommittee to the Chief of Naval Operations. The meeting will consist of discussions of current and future Navy strategy, plans, and policies in support of U.S. deterrence planning, crisis management, and conflict escalation and control. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on April 10, 2007, from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held in the Boardroom in the CNA Corporation Building, 4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Kip Blecher, CNO Executive Panel, 4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311, 703-681-4909. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), these matters constitute classified information that is specifically authorized by Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense and are, in fact, properly classified pursuant to such Executive Order. Accordingly, the Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing that the public interest requires that all sessions of this meeting be closed to the public because they will be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(1) of title 5, United States Code. 

Dated: March 12, 2007. 

M.A. Harvison, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-5030 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
No. 57335.

protests 176964-K (A), etc. (New York).

#### J. J. Coates and Gaillet & Hartig Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

*457Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellophane sheets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56780, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EX-31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

EXHIBIT 31.2

1. Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, George J. Malasek, certify that:
1. 
I have reviewed this transition report on Form 10-KSB of ViaStar Holdings, Inc.; 
2. 
Based on my knowledge, this transition report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this transition report; 
3. 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this transition report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this transition report; 
4. 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  
a)
 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this transition report is being prepared;  
b)
 
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this transition report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  
c)
 
presented in this transition report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 
5. 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  
a)
 
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  
b)
 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 
6. 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this transition report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.     
Dated: October 15, 2003
By:
 
/s/ GEORGE J. MALASEK 
 
 **George J. Malasek**
# C_2008006EN.01002001.xml

| 11.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/20

---

Corrigendum to the Notice for the attention of the persons, groups and entities on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see Annex to Council Decision 2007/871/CFSP of 20 December 2007)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 314 of 22 December 2007
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 314 of 22 December 2007

(2008/C 6/09)

In the Contents (third page of the cover) and on page 42 in the title and in the first sentence:

for:

for:

‘... Council Decision 2007/871/CSFP ...’,

read:

read:

‘... Council Decision 2007/868/EC ...’.

---
| (1)   | the              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Tryx Ventures Corp. for the quarter              ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section              13(a)              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the              quarter ended June 30, 2005, fairly presents in all material respects,              the              financial condition and results of operations of Tryx Ventures              Corp. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                  Alessandra                Bordon                          |   |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:           |                        Alessandra Bordon                                                                                                                                                       |
| Title:          |                        Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                 |
|  Date:     |                         August 22, 2005                                                                                                                                                   |

|   By: |   /s/                  Franco                Perrotta                             |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:           |                        Franco Perrotta                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Title:          |                        Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                 |
|  Date:     |          August                22, 2005                                                                                                                                                              |
446 A.2d 680

#### Commonwealth v. Lane, Appellant.

Submitted March 3, 1981.

Elaine DeMasse, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Gaele McLaughlin Barthold, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, P. J., and WICKERSHAM and BRO-SKY, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen A. Hozie, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.


April 29, 2005              /s/ Stephen A. Hozie
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Stephen A. Hozie
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Before the First Division,

October 6, 1949

No. 53598.

protests 148915-K and 148916-K (New York).

#### Winthrop-Stearns, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of concentrated ox gall the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
SERVED: SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SAMMY DON LADYMON, JR. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0717 

RECI=IVED 

SEP 2 5 2013 

HEARING DOCKgf 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 201!SW290137) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Chief Administrative La 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

F eder~l Aviation Administration 

800 It1dependence Avenue, S.W. 

Was~ington, DC 20591 

Atterpon: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

! Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

S~y Don Ladymon, Jr., Respondent 

17061 Park Circle 

Garl~1d, TX 75044 

I 

ONE COPY 

Y oiJnda Ayala Bernal, Complainant's Counsel 

Sou~west Region 

F ed~ral Aviation Administration 

260j Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort! Worth, TX 76137 

TEl): 817-222-5070 

FAX: 817-222-5945 or 5092 

i 

TheiHonorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Of*e of Hearings, M-20 

U.s'. Department of Transportation 

120p New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Wa~hington, DC 20590 

TE}: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

1 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FA\X: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0717 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

J 1 Service was by U.S. MaiL For service in person or by expedited courier, use tbe following address: Federal 

A 1

iation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

D<j: 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
#### Theresa Sebastian, Appellant, v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation et al., Respondents.

[634 NYS2d 114]

—Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Leland De-Grasse, J.), entered on May 13, 1994, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, is unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated, without costs or disbursements.

Discrimination claimants, such as plaintiff, are not required to file notices of claim pursuant to the General Municipal Law. Both General Municipal Law § 50-i and McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 7401 (2) (New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation Act § 20 [2]; L 1969, ch 1016, § 1, as amended), which specifically deals with actions against the Health and Hospitals Corporation, define the torts for which a notice of claim is required *only*as personal injury, wrongful death, or damage to property and not torts generally.

*Mills v County of Monroe*(59 NY2d 307, *cert denied*464 US 1018), cited by the IAS Court, is not contrary. In *Mills (supra,*at 309, n), the Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a discrimination complaint by the Fourth Department relying upon the fact that there *was*a notice requirement in County Law § 52 (1) applying to " '[a]ny claim * * * against a county for damage, injury or death, or for invasion of personal or property rights, of every name and nature’ ”, Accordingly, the Appellate Division in *Mills*stated: "Plaintiff argues correctly that an action brought under section 296 of the Executive Law is not a tort claim which falls within the notice provisions of the General Municipal Law” *(Mills v County of Monroe,*89 *295AD2d 776, *affd*59 NY2d 307, *supra).*Nevertheless, it dismissed the complaint because of the applicability of section 52 of the County Law *(supra).*

Since, as noted, *supra,*the only other law dealing with the issue herein, McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 7401, uses the same language as the General Municipal Law, plaintiff was under no requirement to comply with the notice requirements. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Before the Second Division,

January 20, 1943

No. 47930.

#### Protest 643692-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Kinchelos, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise in question is cotton rags the same as those involved in *United States*v. *Schapiro*(24 C. C. P. A. 343, T. D. 48771). They were therefore held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1750 in accordance with the percentages as set out in the stipulation.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 51 (Friday, March 16, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4803]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 232


Conduct on Postal Property; Weapons Prohibition

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Postal Service is amending the rules for conduct on 
Postal Service property to clarify the prohibition of carrying or 
storing on Postal Service property any firearms or other dangerous 
weapons, or deadly weapons or explosives, except for official purposes.

DATES: Effective March 16, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lawrence Katz, Inspector in Charge, 
Office of Counsel, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, 202-268-7732.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The amendment to the prohibition of 
carrying, either openly or concealed, or storing any firearms, other 
dangerous or deadly weapons or explosives on Postal Service property is 
to clarify the rule, ensuring that these items are only possessed for 
official purposes. This change would eliminate potential conflicts with 
other laws, rules or regulations which may allow the possession of 
these articles for other than official purposes.

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 232

    Authority delegations (Government agencies), Crime, Federal 
buildings and facilities, Government property, Law enforcement 
officers, Postal Service, Security measures.

0
In view of the considerations discussed above, the Postal Service 
adopts the following amendment to 39 CFR part 232.

PART 232--CONDUCT ON POSTAL PROPERTY

0
1. The authority citation for part 232 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 18 U.S.C. 13, 3061; 21 U.S.C. 802, 844; 39 U.S.C. 
401, 403(b)(3), 404(a)(7), 1201(2).

0
2. In Sec.  232.1, paragraph (l) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  232.1  Conduct on postal property.

* * * * *
    (l) Weapons and explosives. Notwithstanding the provisions of any 
other law, rule or regulation, no person while on postal property may 
carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons, or explosives, 
either openly or concealed, or store the same on postal property, 
except for official purposes.
* * * * *

Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E7-4803 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 1, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

132953 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. THELMA JOHNSON, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Carl Johnson, Deceased Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132953 COA: 262143 Genesee CC: 00-069254-NH HURLEY MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., d/b/a HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER,MOONGILMADUGU INBAVAZHVU, M.D., Defendants-Appellants,

and

KENNETH JORDAN, M.D., Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of May 30, 2007, the applicatio n for leave to appeal the April 13, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals was he ld in abeyance pend ing the decision in Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on November 28, 2007, 4 80 Mich ___ (2007), the app lication is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to ap peal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of A ppeals because the court erred in invoking the doctrine of equitable tolling under these circumstances. Devillers v Auto Club Ins Ass’n , 473 Mich 562, 586-587 n 65 (2005). However, because the plainti ff falls within the class of plaintiffs entitled to relief identified in our order in Mullins

, supra , we REMAND this case to the Genesee Circuit Court for entry of an order denying the defendants’ motion for summary disposition and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order and
the order in Mullins

.

C AVANAGH and W EAVER , JJ., concur in the result._______________________________________ __ 2

K ELLY , J., concurs and states as follows:

I concur with the conclusion that our decision in Waltz v Wyse 1 does not bar plaintiff’s claim. But, as explained in my statement in Mazumder v Univ of Michigan Bd of Regents, 2 given the state of the la w when the Court of App eals rendered its decision, resort to the doctrine of equitable tolling was highly appropriate.

1 Waltz v Wyse, 469 Mich 642 (2004).

2 Mazumder v Univ of Michigan Bd of Regents, 480 Mich ___ (2008).

l0129 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 1, 2008

Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 Nos. 333-87088, 333-33382, and 333-60354) pertaining to the 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Websense, Inc. of our
report dated January 17, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Websense, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                                    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Diego, California
March 26, 2003