alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Peter Glennon et al., Respondents, v Anthony S. Mayo et al., Appellants.

[633 NYS2d 400]

—In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 for a judgment declaring the validity of easements, and a permanent injunction against interfering with their use, the defendants appeal from stated portions of (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), *505dated December 9, 1993, which, after a nonjury trial, *inter alia,*made the declaration and awarded the plaintiffs a permanent injunction and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, entered February 17, 1994, which awarded the same relief.

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment dated December 9, 1993, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that judgment was superseded by the amended judgment entered February 17, 1994; and it is further,

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs Peter and Christine Glennon (hereinafter the Glennons) and Frank Clarke are the owners of contiguous parcels of land which share as a border a private road which runs from Edge of Woods Road on the north to North SeaMecox Road on the south in the Town of Southampton. The northern boundaries of the plaintiffs’ respective parcels front on Edge of Woods Road while the southern boundaries of their parcels abut several parcels owned by the defendants, some of which front on North Sea-Mecox Road. The plaintiffs sought a declaration of their entitlement to easements over the private road in order to access North Sea-Mecox Road.

We agree with the defendants’ contention that the Glennons failed to show by clear and convincing evidence their entitlement to an implied easement based upon a preexisting use, inasmuch as mere convenience is insufficient to justify entitlement to such an easement *(see, Four S Realty Co. v Dynko,*210 AD2d 622; *Astwood v Bachinsky,*186 AD2d 949). In addition, the Glennons did not show that the use of the private road to access North Sea-Mecox Road by them and their predecessors in title was hostile and thus, did not establish their right to a prescriptive easement *(see, Turner v Baisley,*197 AD2d 681; *2239 Hylan Blvd. Corp. v Saccheri,*188 AD2d 524; *Boumis v Caetano,*140 AD2d 401).

We find, however, that the Glennons established an implied easement by virtue of reference to the private road as a boundary in the deed which created their parcel, and the surrounding circumstances *(see,*49 NY Jur 2d, Easements and Licenses in Real Property, § 58; *cf, Tarolli v Westvale Genesee,*6 NY2d 32). In addition, Frank Clarke established an easement by express grant *(see, Strnad v Brudnicki,*200 AD2d 735).

We have considered the defendants’ remaining contentions, and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
No. 54715.

#### American Jewelers *v.*United States,

protest 160607-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
AMENDMENT TO THE
ITRON, INC. EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2012
 
WHEREAS, Itron, Inc. (the "Employer") has adopted, and currently maintains, the Itron, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), pursuant to which a select group of management and highly compensated employees of the Company and its designated subsidiaries and affiliates may defer compensation and equity compensation awards; and 


WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Employer, pursuant to its authority under the Plan, has amended the Plan to provide a different matching contribution and has authorized the Company to document such amendment; and 


WHEREAS, the Employer desires to document such amendment in terms of the Plan; 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows, effective January 1, 2017:


Distributions


		
	1.
	Section 5.1 is amended to add the following sentence to the end of that Section:




"Effective January 1, 2017, an Employee-Participant's Account shall be credited with matching contributions in an amount equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the first six percent (6%) of total Salary and Bonuses deferred under the Plan by such Participant during a payroll period to the extent that such deferred Salary and Bonus exceeds an amount equal to the annual limit under Section 401(a)(17) of the Code earned by the Employee-Participant in the applicable calendar year."
 
Except as amended above, the provisions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer, by its duly authorized officer, has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the 14th day of September, 2016.
 


ITRON, INC. 


	
		
	By:
	/s/ Michel Cadieux

	Name:
	Michel Cadieux

	Title:
	SVP of Human Resources
No. 58094.

protest 212904-K (New York).

#### Robert Mance and Mohegan International Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is composed of rush and is not of grass nor of rice straw; that merchandise of like character is now being assessed at 20 percent under said paragraph 1021, as modified, *supra;*and that the termination of the said General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade with respect to concessions therein initially negotiated with China (T. D. 52587), insofar as said paragraph 1021 is concerned, related only to floor coverings of grass or of rice straw. Upon the agreed statement of facts, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP04-98-002]


Indicated Shippers v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice 
of Compliance Filing

March 13, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 2, 2007, pursuant to the directive of the 
Commission's Staff at the February 15, 2007 technical conference, 
Columbia Gulf Transmission Company (Columbia Gulf) submits this filing 
supplementing its proposal in the above referenced proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#682e2d3a2b27060401060d3b1d1818071a1c280e0d1a0b460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d89e9d8a9b97b6b4b1b6bd8bada8a8b7aaac98bebdaabbf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4994 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32


                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial  officer of First South Bancorp,  Inc., each hereby certifies that, to
the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-KSB of the issuer  fully
complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934,  and that the  information  contained in the report fairly
presents,  in all  material  aspects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

March 24, 2005
                                            s/Barry L. Slider
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Barry L. Slider
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                           s/V. Lewis Shuler
                                           ---------------------------
                                           V. Lewis Shuler
                                           Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5000 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5000

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of 
  a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING TO ADDRESS POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF 
              A CERTAIN RECORD OF DECISION ON THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER 
              BASIN FUND.

    (a) In General.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
Commissioner of Reclamation, and the Secretary of Energy, acting 
through the Administrator of the Western Area Power Administration, in 
consultation with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Working 
Group, shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to explore and 
address the potential impact that the record of decision entitled the 
``Supplement to the 2016 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and 
Management Plan Record of Decision'' and dated July 2024 (referred to 
in this section as the ``record of decision'') may have on the Upper 
Colorado River Basin Fund (referred to in this section as the 
``Fund'').
    (b) Required Plan.--The memorandum of understanding entered into 
under subsection (a) shall, using information derived from existing 
contracts, include the establishment of a plan--
            (1) to explore and address the effects that the record of 
        decision may have on the contents of the Fund;
            (2) to analyze and address the longer-term impact that the 
        record of decision may have on hydropower production at Glen 
        Canyon Dam; and
            (3) to protect the Colorado River Basin and any species 
        listed as a threatened species or an endangered species under 
        section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
        1533) in the Colorado River Basin from the effects of invasive 
        species and sustained drought.

            Passed the Senate December 18 (legislative day, December 
      16), 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 5000

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of 
  a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.
```
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Eric William Zessman 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(IA 1947A Aft149
Before the First Division,

December 16, 1958

No. 62600.

#### American Express Company *v.*United States,

protest 58/124/15097 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chair backs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 39, C. A. D. 669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10118)

#### Christofle Silver, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 956945, etc.

*538(Decided December 7, 1961)

*Jordan & Klingaman,*for tbe plaintiff.

*William H. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Rao, Judge:

Tbe appeals for reappraisement listed in tbe schedule of reappraisements annexed hereto and made a part hereof have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court,

> 1. That tbe merchandise tbe subject of tbe reappraisement appeals enumerated in Schedule A, hereto annexed and made a part hereof, consists of household silverware articles exported from Eranee during tbe period from February 1959 through July 1960.

> 2. That said merchandise is not included in the Final List (T.D. 54521), published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of *1956;*and that on the dates of exportation herein such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for exportation to the United States pursuant to Section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the said Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 3. That the export values for the dates of exportation herein are as set forth in the aforesaid annexed Schedule A.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the reappraisement appeals herein may be submitted on this stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise covered by said appeals and that such values were as stated in schedule A, hereto annexed and. made a part hereof.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
|   | (1) | the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q      of Debut Broadcasting Corporation Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,      2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, fairly      presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of Debut Broadcasting Corporation  Inc. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/      Ronald Heineman                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Ronald      Heineman                         |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer andDirector |
| Date:  | May      17, 2010                            |
|   |                                         |
| By:    | /s/      Sariah Hopkins                      |
| Name:  | Sariah      Hopkins                          |
| Title: | Principal      Financial Officer             |
| Date:  | May      17,2010                             |

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****� The Lorax curriculum guide
**activityguide ; classroomguide**
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.36/2:L 88
Item Number:0086-C (online)
CGP systemNumber:000896629
 
October 9, 2019
 **
EX-10.14



 Exhibit 10.14 

ADDENDUM #7 TO THE 

CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN

 CEDAR MANAGEMENT LIMITED (“MANAGER”) 

AND 
 AMERINST INSURANCE
COMPANY, LTD. (“COMPANY”) 
 EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2015 

Management Agreement Addendum 
  

	 	1)	It is hereby agreed that the COMPANY will compensate MANAGER at a rate of $327,500 for the twelve months beginning 1/1/15 and ending 12/31/15, which shall be inclusive of all work by MANAGER on run-off of CAMICO and
PDIC treaties as well as continuing business from Crum & Forster. 

  

	 	2)	Cause the above fee to be paid in quarterly installments in advance at the beginning of each calendar quarter. 

  

	 	3)	Reimburse MANAGER for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred during the management of the COMPANY including; courier and express mail service; long distance telephone calls; travel and meeting expenses incurred at
the request of the COMPANY; costs of COMPANY stationery; filing fees; and similar expenses. 

  

	 	4)	MANAGER will continue to provide COMPANY with monthly time summaries. 

 COMPANY agrees that special projects
will be invoiced separately at agreed upon fees or rates. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Addendum this 26th day of February,
2015. 
  

			
	By:		/s/ THOMAS R. MCMAHON
			Cedar Management Limited (itself and on behalf of its affiliated companies)
		
	By:		/s/ STUART H. GRAYSTON
			AmerInst Insurance Company, Ltd.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4909]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision (ROD) on the Final 
General Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (FGMP/EIS), 
Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site

SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of 
the ROD on the FGMP/EIS for Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National 
Historic Site, Kentucky. This is being done pursuant to the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332.
    On November 29, 2006, the Regional Director, NPS, Southeast Region, 
approved the ROD for the project. As soon as practicable, the NPS will 
begin to implement the FGMP/EIS, described as the Preferred Alternative 
contained in the FGMP/EIS issued on October 20, 2006. The approved plan 
will enhance opportunities for visitors to interact with and appreciate 
all of the national historic site's resources while providing for the 
preservation or adaptive use of cultural resources when implemented. 
The approved plan also recommends that the official name of the site be 
changed to ``Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historical Park.''

DATES: The ROD was signed by the Regional Director, NPS, Southeast 
Region, on November 29, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD are available from the Superintendent, 
Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site, 2995 Lincoln Farm 
Road, Hodgenville, Kentucky 42748-9707; telephone: 270-358-3137.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Superintendent, Abraham Lincoln 
National Historic Site, at the address and telephone number shown 
above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The responsible official for the ROD is 
Patricia A. Hooks, Regional Director, Southeast Region, National Park 
Service, 100 Alabama Street SW., 1924 Building, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

    Dated: January 16, 2007.
Patricia A. Hooks,
Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. E7-4909 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-5C-P
No. 50513.

#### Protest 961648-G/11390 of Manuel A. Escalante (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the hearing the attorney who signed the original protest testified that he was retained under a contract by the importer of record. *274It has been held that the regulations instructing collectors of customs to reject protests filed by an agent unless powers of attorney, authorizing such agent or attorney to act, have been filed with such collectors, are contrary to the right granted by Congress for a review of official action in sections 514 and 515, Tariff Act of 1930. It has been further held that it is the duty of the collector to forward the protest to the Customs Court in order that the person signing such protest may have an opportunity to prove his authority to so act. *(United Bulb Co.*v. *United States,*6 Cust. Ct. 78, C. D. 431; C. *D. Lloyd*v. *United States,*id. 421, C. D. 507; and *Rhodes Bros.*v. *United States,*7 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 528, cited.) Inasmuch as the evidence showed that an attorney in good standing in the Customs Court signed the original protest under authority to act for his client, it was held that the protest was properly filed and that the collector should accept same and take further action under the mandatory provisions of section 515. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff to that effect.
State of Delaware
Secretary of State
Division of Corporations
Filed 09:00AM 11/06/2001
010558434 - 2149636


                                 Certificate Of Amendment
                                             Of
                                Certificate Of Incorporation
                                   Of Web4boats.com, Inc.

	FIRST: That a meeting of the Board of Directors of Web4boats.com, Inc.,
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment
to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation
for consideration thereof.  The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment as follows:

	RESOLVED: that the Certificate of Incorporation be amended by changing the
Article thereof number "FIRST" so that, as amended, said article shall be and
read as follows:  The name of this corporation is: FEDERAL SECURITY PROTECTION
SERVICES, INC.

	SECOND:  That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors,
a special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and
held, upon notice in accordance with section 228 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares
as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

	THIRD:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with provisions
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

	FOURTH: That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under or
by reason of said corporation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said WEB4BOATS.COM, INC. has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its President on this 25th day of October, 2001.


WEB4BOATS.COM INC.

By:  /s/ Dennis Schlagel
	 President

	 Dennis Schlagel
	 Print Name
No. 51461.

#### Protests 38018-K, etc., of C. A. Andres et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.