alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**     I, Robert J. Messey, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Arch Western Resources, LLC;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved.]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.                                                               /s/ Robert J. Messey   Robert J. Messey   Vice President   Date:August 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8259 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8259

  To amend the California Desert Protection Act of 1994 to expand the 
                 boundary of Joshua Tree National Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2024

   Mr. Ruiz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the California Desert Protection Act of 1994 to expand the 
                 boundary of Joshua Tree National Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Joshua Tree National Park Expansion 
Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL PARK.

    Section 402 of the California Desert Protection Act of 1994 (16 
U.S.C. 410aaa-22) is amended, in the first sentence, by inserting after 
``October 1991 or prior,'' the following: ``and including the 
approximately 17,842 acres of land depicted on the map entitled 
`Proposed Joshua Tree National Park Expansion' and dated April 29, 
2024,''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2007246EN.01001401.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/14

---

Communication from the Commission on the final percentage take-up for 2007 of rice import quotas provided for by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2021/2006

(2007/C 246/07)

The final percentage take-up of each quota provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2021/2006 of 22 December 2006 opening and providing for the administration of import quotas for rice originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) and the overseas countries and territories (OCT) (1) for 2007 is fixed as follows:

1

| Origin/product | Serial number | Final percentage take-up of the quota for 2007 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ACP States (Articles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2021/2006)






  — | CN codes 1006 10 21 to 1006 10 98, 1006 20 and 1006 30 |

Origin/product

Serial number

Final percentage take-up of the quota for 2007

ACP States (Articles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2021/2006)

—

CN codes 1006 10 21 to 1006 10 98, 1006 20 and 1006 30

09.4187

99,95 %

ACP States (Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2021/2006)

| — | CN code 1006 40 00 |
| --- | --- |

—

CN code 1006 40 00

09.4188

99,08 %

OCT (Article 8 and Article 9(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 2021/2006)

| — | CN code 1006 |
| --- | --- |

—

CN code 1006

| (a) | Netherlands Antilles and Aruba |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Netherlands Antilles and Aruba

09.4189

75,47 %

| (b) | Least-developed OCT |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Least-developed OCT

09.4190

0 %

---

(1)  OJ L 384, 22.12.2006, p. 61.

1

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIONELL THOLMER,

Petitioner,

v.

C.M. HARRISON, Warden,

Respondent.

CIV S-04-2491 FCD PAN P

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Respondent has filed a request for an enlargement of time to file and serve a response to

the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ordered that:

1. Respondent’s request for an enlargement of time is granted;

2. Respondent shall file and serve a response to the petition within ten days of the date

of this order.

Dated: June 21, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02491-FCD-EFB Document 16 Filed 06/22/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL McCEE FOUNTAIN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2350 GEB DAD P

vs.

JAMES YATES, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no

absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d

453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at

any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing

§ 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be

served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s June 30, 2006 motion

for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage

of the proceedings.

DATED: July 19, 2006.

DAD:bb

foun2350.110

Case 2:04-cv-02350-GEB-DAD Document 43 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

M.V.,

Appellant,

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY

AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00156

- CV

Appeal from the

65 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012DCM07071)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

It appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court

makes no other order with respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Rivera, J., not participating
Before the Third Division,

April 2, 1945

No. 50115.

#### Petition 6381-R of Cahn Bros. & Ryder, Inc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It appeared from the record that the importer was notified by his customs broker, who made the entry herein, that the appraiser had no definite value for the merchandise and was advised by said broker to write his shipper in an endeavor to obtain information from them. The only reason given in the record for the importer not adopting the course suggested was that he felt sure that the value stated on the invoice was correct because that *235was the amount paid for the merchandise. The United States examiner who passed the .importation testified that he was well acquainted with the broker in this case and that, in his opinion, there was no intent on the part of those concerned in this entry to deceive anyone. On cross-examination, however, he admitted that he did not know the importer. The court was of the opinion that the proof offered was not sufficient to warrant a finding in favor of the petitioner. The fact that the importer had paid the price shown on the invoice was held not a sufficient reason for his declining to take any steps to obtain information as to whether such price represented the statutory market value of the goods. (Tagge*sell Co.*v. *United States,*17 C. C. P. A. 15, T. D. 43318, cited.) The petition was therefore denied.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8155 

To direct the Secretary of Energy to develop fish and wildlife program 

funding alternatives to mitigate the cost to Bonneville Power Administration ratepayers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2024 

Mr. NEWHOUSE (for himself, Mr. FULCHER, Mr. ZINKE, and Mr. BENTZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Energy to develop fish and wildlife 

program funding alternatives to mitigate the cost to Bonneville Power Administration ratepayers, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ratepayer Funding 

5 Alternative Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8155 IH

1 SEC. 2. FISH AND WILDLIFE PROGRAM FUNDING ALTER2 NATIVES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Energy, in con4 sultation with the heads of other relevant Federal agen5 cies, shall develop, with respect to the fish and wildlife 

6 program of the Bonneville Power Administration, alter7 native funding options that do not pass the expense of the 

8 program on to the power and transmission service cus9 tomers of the Bonneville Power Administration. 

10 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 6 months after the date 

11 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall 

12 submit to each of the Committees on Appropriations for 

13 the House of Representatives and the Senate a report that 

14 describes the alternative funding options developed under 

15 subsection (a). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|December 6, 2005 | /s/ John P. Manning    
|---------------- | -----------------------
|                 | John P. Manning        
|                 | Chief Executive Officer
|                 |
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 479 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 479

  To modify the fire management assistance cost share, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2023

  Mr. Padilla (for himself and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the fire management assistance cost share, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fire Suppression and Response 
Funding Assurance Act''.

SEC. 2. FIRE MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE COST SHARE AND ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 420 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5187) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of assistance under this 
section shall be not less than 75 percent of the eligible cost of such 
assistance.
    ``(f) Eligible Expense.--A State or local government may use 
assistance provided under this section for the predeployment of assets 
and resources.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
only apply to amounts appropriated on or after the date of enactment of 
this Act.

SEC. 3. RULEMAKING.

    Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
President, acting through the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, shall conduct and complete a rulemaking to provide 
criteria for the circumstances under which the Administrator may 
recommend the President increase the Federal cost share for section 420 
of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 
(42 U.S.C. 5187).
                                 <all>
```
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
330 E. Warm Springs
Las Vegas, NV 89119
702.528.1984





March 29, 2000


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report
of March 29, 2000, on the Financial Statements of Deadman's Point, Inc. from
the inception date of March 30, 1999 through December 31, 1999, in any filings
which are necessary now or in the near future to be filed with the US
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Signed,

/s/G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
Nevada License #2701
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Garcia, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 154]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Sheindlin, J., at suppression hearing; Alexander Hunter, J., at plea and sentence), rendered February 6, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to intermittent imprisonment of two days a week for a period of 1 year, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied. The initial stop was validly based on a traffic infraction *(People v Ellis,*62 NY2d 393, 396). When defendant failed to produce a driver’s license and registration for the vehicle he was driving and gave various conflicting responses as to ownership, the officer then had a reasonable suspicion that the vehicle might be stolen. This justified opening the driver’s door to observe whether there were keys in the ignition. *(See, People v David L.,*56 NY2d 698*[revg on dissenting mem*81 AD2d 893, 895-896], *cert denied*459 US 866; *People v Harris,*160 AD2d 515, 517, *lv denied*76 NY2d 789.) Since it was proper for the officer to look into the vehicle, the gun seen in plain view was lawfully seized. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



CERTIFICATIONS

I, Allan Weiss, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elderwatch, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuers internal control over financial reporting.



5. The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditor and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



By/s/ Allan Weiss

Allan Weiss

President, Chief Executive Officer



Date:  August 15, 2005
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2018 (the “Report”) of Oxford Square Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce L. Rubin, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Bruce L. Rubin     | 
|---------------------- | 
|Name: Bruce L. Rubin   | 
|Date: October 31, 2018 |