alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                                   ----------

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of TechAlt, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), David M. Otto,
Principal Executive Officer of the Company and Pricipal Financial Officer of the
Company,  respectively,  does  hereby  certify,  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ David M. Otto
-----------------------
David M. Otto
Principal Executive Officer
January 13, 2006


/s/ David M. Otto
-----------------------
David M. Otto
Principal Financial Officer
January 13, 2006

[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to TechAlt, Inc. and will be retained by TechAlt, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
| EXHIBIT      32.1 |
|-------------------|

| (1)   | the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Debut Broadcasting Corporation Inc. for      the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Debut Broadcasting      Corporation Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Steven Ludwig                 |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Steven      Ludwig               |   |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer |   |
| Date:  | August      11, 2009             |   |
|   |                             |   |
| By:    | /s/ Sariah Hopkins_              |   |
| Name:  | Sariah      Hopkins              |   |
| Title: | Principal      Financial Officer |   |
| Date:  | August      11, 2009             |   |

----
EXHIBIT 21





SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


AS OF JUNE 30, 2002





|1. |  | The London P.E.T. Centre Limited (sold July 2002)
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | Mobile P.E.T. Leasing Limited (sold July 2002)
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------




|3. |  | Mobile P.E.T. Systems (UK) Limited
|-- |  | ----------------------------------




|4. |  | Molecular Imaging Corporation, a Delaware corporation
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------




|5. |  | Radiodiagnostics Corporation, a Nevada corporation
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------




|6. |  | MBPT #1, LLC, a California limited liability company
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------




|7. |  | MBPT #2, LLC, a California limited liability company
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------




|8. |  | MBPT #3, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------




|9. |  | MBPT #4, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------




|10. |  | PET Billing Solutions, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

RAUL MONTANEZ-HERNANDEZ,

Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D23-1652 September 27, 2023 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Pat Siracusa, Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

AND

ARIZONA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 

ENTERPRISES, LLC, (doing business as Arizona 

Technology Enterprises), 

Plaintiff,

v.

PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.,

AND LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,

Defendants,

AND

ILLUMINA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2013-1060

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 10-CV-0735, Judge Sue L. 

Robinson.

Case: 13-1060 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 07/15/2013
2 HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORP. v. PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

The parties jointly move to dismiss the appeal due to 

settlement. 

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

(3) All other pending motions are denied as moot. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk 

s25

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 15, 2013

Case: 13-1060 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 07/15/2013
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Patrick F. ConroyName: Patrick F. Conroy Date: August 8, 2013
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4401 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to ensure 

that the small business regulatory budget for a fiscal year is not greater 

than zero, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. BUDD, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. 

SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to ensure that the small business regulatory 

budget for a fiscal year is not greater than zero, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Regu5 latory Reduction Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4401 IS

1 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION RULEMAKING 

2 COSTS TO SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Small 

4 Business Administration shall ensure that the small busi5 ness regulatory budget for a fiscal year is not greater than 

6 zero. 

7 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the last 

8 day of a fiscal year, the Administrator of the Small Busi9 ness Administration shall submit to Congress a report on 

10 any regulations issued by other Federal agencies that have 

11 an impact on small business concerns. Such report shall 

12 include rules issued during the fiscal year preceding and 

13 the fiscal year following the date of the report and such 

14 rules shall be disaggregated by the issuing Federal agency. 

15 (c) SMALL BUSINESS REGULATORY BUDGET DE16 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘small business regu17 latory budget’’ means the cost to small business concerns 

18 (as defined under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 

19 U.S.C. 632)) of rulemaking (including the cost of a new 

20 rule and any modification to or repeal of a rule) by the 

21 Administrator of the Small Business Administration. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD HODGES,

Petitioner,

v.

DAVID RUNNELS, Warden,

Respondent.

Civ. S-04-2087 MCE KJM-P

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that respondent may have until

September 11, 2005, to file an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner may file

and serve a traverse within 30 days of his receipt of the answer.

DATED: July 25, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02087-MCE -KJM Document 5 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 499 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 499

     To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to 
 reauthorize the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2023

Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Graham, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. 
   Crapo, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Grassley, Ms. 
 Cortez Masto, Ms. Ernst, Mrs. Shaheen, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Coons, Ms. 
Cantwell, and Mr. Tillis) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to 
 reauthorize the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debbie Smith Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 2(j) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 
(34 U.S.C. 40701(j)) is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2019 through 
2024'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2024 through 2029''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2007039EN.01002501.xml

| 23.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/25

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 39/11)

GERMANY

Operating licences granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Air Hamburg Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH | Kleine Bahnstr. 8 |
| D-22525 Hamburg |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

Air Hamburg Luftverkehrsgesellschaft mbH

Kleine Bahnstr. 8

D-22525 Hamburg

passengers, mail, cargo

13.12.2006

DVS Deutsche Verkehrsfliegerschule GmbH

| Flugplatz |
| --- |
| D-63329 Egelsbach |

Flugplatz

D-63329 Egelsbach

passengers, mail, cargo

31.1.2007

Operating licences revoked

Category A:   Operating licences without the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lufthansa Flight Training GmbH | Airporting Tor 24 |
| D-60549 Frankfurt/Main |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

Lufthansa Flight Training GmbH

Airporting Tor 24

D-60549 Frankfurt/Main

passengers, mail, cargo

22.12.2006

Antares Airtransport Maintenance und Service AG

| Friedenstr. 113 |
| --- |
| D-02929 Rothenburg/Oberlausitz |

Friedenstr. 113

D-02929 Rothenburg/Oberlausitz

passengers, mail, cargo

31.1.2007

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Helicopter Medical Services | Flugplatz |
| D-63329 Egelsbach |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

Helicopter Medical Services

Flugplatz

D-63329 Egelsbach

passengers, mail, cargo

21.12.2006

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p.1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-Qof Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,2010, I, Martin S. Lapera, President and Chief Executive Officer of FrederickCounty Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)   such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   the information contained in such Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Frederick CountyBancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ Martin S. Lapera                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Martin S. Lapera                       |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Thomas O’Gorman et al., Appellants, v Gold Shield Security & Investigation, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And a Third-*326Party Action.)

[633 NYS2d 517]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), entered February 4, 1994, which granted the motion of the defendant TC Services for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it, and (2) an order of the same court, dated August 1, 1994, which granted the motion of the defendant Gold Shield Security & Investigation, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims and counterclaims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with separate bills of costs payable to the respondents by the appellants.

TC Services, the owner of the premises where the plaintiff Thomas O’Gorman was working at the time he was allegedly assaulted by an unidentified assailant, is an out-of-possession landlord, the premises having been leased to Trans Con Lines as a trucking facility. Although an out-of-possession landlord may be subject to liability for injuries caused to an individual on the premises when it is contractually obligated to make repairs or maintain the premises *(see, Putnam v Stout,*38 NY2d 607; *see also, Ahmad v Getty Petroleum Corp.,*217 AD2d 600; *Bettis v County of Nassau,*212 AD2d 749), here the lease agreement does not contain such an obligation. Moreover, there is no evidence that TC Services was involved in the daily operations of the trucking facility, or that it retained a sufficient degree of dominion and control over the premises to provide a basis for the imposition of liability *(see, Kramer v Ash Clothing,*213 AD2d 600).

We further find that summary judgment was properly granted to Gold Shield Security & Investigation, Inc. (hereinafter Gold Shield) because the plaintiffs failed to establish that the contract between Trans Con Lines and Gold Shield intended to confer a direct benefit upon Thomas O’Gorman, a Trans Con Lines employee, as a third-party beneficiary, to protect him from physical injury *(see, Bernal v Pinkerton’s, Inc.,*52 AD2d 760, *affd*41 NY2d 938; *see, Johnson v McLane Assocs.,*201 AD2d 436, citing *Paradiso v Apex Investigators & Sec. Co.,*91 AD2d 929; *cf., Flynn v Niagara Univ.,*198 AD2d 262).

We have examined the plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Ritter, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

DAVID COLVIN, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 69148 

FILED 

JAN 1 3 2016 

TRACIE K. UNDEMAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

BY 

DEPUTY CLERK 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a 

resentence motion to disqualify a judge. Eighth Judicial District Court, 

Clark County; David B. Barker, Judge. 

When our initial review of the notice of appeal and documents 

before this court revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, we ordered 

appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack 

of jurisdiction. Specifically, we noted that no statute or court rule provides 

for an appeal from an order denying a motion to disqualify a judge. See 

Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). 

Appellant's response indicates that the motion to disqualify is intertwined 

with a motion to withdraw a plea. However, appellant does not identify 

any statute or court rule allowing for an appeal from an order denying a 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1047A ce -01 1 07 

I* 
motion to disqualify a judge. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack 

jurisdiction over this appeal and 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1 

Douglas 

Cherry Gibbons 

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge 

Alan J. Butte11 & Associates 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

David Colvin 

1 \Are note that intermediate orders may be reviewed on appeal from 

a final judgment. NRS 177.045. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 2 

47-a
No. 38885.

#### Protest 454460-G of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 37230 the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was sustained.
II 

Calendar No. 420 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4554 

To express support for protecting access to reproductive health care after 

the Dobbs v. Jackson decision on June 24, 2022. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2024 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. BUTLER, Ms. 

CANTWELL, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, 

Ms. HASSAN, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Ms. ROSEN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. SMITH, Ms. STABENOW, Ms. WARREN, Mr. BENNET, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. COONS, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. 

PADILLA, Mr. SCHATZ, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read the first time 

JUNE 18, 2024 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To express support for protecting access to reproductive 

health care after the Dobbs v. Jackson decision on June 

24, 2022. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4554 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reproductive Freedom 

3 for Women Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

5 It is the sense of Congress that— 

6 (1) protections for access to abortion rights and 

7 other reproductive health care after the Dobbs v. 

8 Jackson, 597 U.S. 215 (2022) decision on June 24, 

9 2022, should be supported; and 

10 (2) the protections enshrined in Roe v. Wade, 

11 410 U.S. 113 (1973) should be restored and built 

12 upon, moving towards a future where there is repro13 ductive freedom for all. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 420 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4554 

A BILL 

To express support for protecting access to reproductive health care after the Dobbs v. Jackson decision on June 24, 2022. 

JUNE 18, 2024 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(Reap. Dec. 8557)

#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 973182.

(Decided March 9, 1956)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When this case was called for hearing, the record indicates that there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff and the case was submitted “subject to a motion for judgment by defendant.”

In conformity with the requirements of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2631), I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the *546presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment for defendant will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4868 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4868

To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the use of official 
                       time by Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2024

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the use of official 
                       time by Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Union Time on the Taxpayer's Dime 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF OFFICIAL TIME.

    (a) In General.--Section 7131 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 7131. Elimination of official time
    ``Any activities performed by an employee relating to the business 
of a labor organization shall be performed during the time the employee 
is in a non-duty status.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for subchapter IV of 
chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking the 
item relating to section 7131 and inserting the following:

``7131. Elimination of official time.''.
                                 <all>
```