alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

# ACTION:

Notice of intent to enter into an enhanced-use lease. 

# SUMMARY:

The Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) intends to enter into two enhanced-use leases with a joint venture consisting of two not-for-profit organizations. Each enhanced-use lease will include a building with an underlying parcel of land. Both parcels are located on approximately 5 acres of the VA Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center campus in Sepulveda, California. The lessee would develop, finance, renovate, construct, manage, maintain and operate the buildings to provide permanent supportive housing and ancillary services for the homeless, with priority placement for homeless veterans within the community. In addition to such property enhancements and veteran services, VA would receive consideration for the lease, in the form of in-kind services such as training, use of space, and professional counseling services to veteran tenants, and cash in the form of a percentage of revenues from certain filmmaking activities on the property. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Sexton, Office of Asset Enterprise Management (004B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-9470. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Title 8 U.S.C. 8161                     *et seq.*                     states that the Secretary may enter into an enhanced-use lease if he determines that the implementation of a business plan proposed by the Under Secretary for Health for applying the consideration under such a lease to the provision of medical care and services would result in a demonstrable improvement of services to eligible veterans in the geographic service-delivery area within which the property is located. This project meets this requirement.                 

Approved: March 8, 2007. 

R. James Nicholson, 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

[FR Doc. E7-4827 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4833 

To exclude locality adjustments from average pay for purposes of computing 

the amount of retirement annuities of new employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2024 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To exclude locality adjustments from average pay for purposes of computing the amount of retirement annuities 

of new employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Lo5 cality Accountability in Retirement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF LOCALITY ADJUSTMENTS FROM RE7 TIREMENT ANNUITIES. 

8 Section 8401 of title 5, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4833 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘, which for 

2 a revised average pay employee shall exclude any lo3 cality-based comparability payments under section 

4 5304 or 5304a,’’ after ‘‘rates of basic pay’’; 

5 (2) in paragraph (38)(B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

6 the end; 

7 (3) in paragraph (39), by striking the period at 

8 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(40) the term ‘revised average pay employee’ 

11 means an individual who— 

12 ‘‘(A) on the date of enactment of this 

13 paragraph— 

14 ‘‘(i) is not an employee or Member 

15 covered under this chapter; 

16 ‘‘(ii) is not performing civilian service 

17 which is creditable service under section 

18 8411; and 

19 ‘‘(iii) has not performed any civilian 

20 service which is creditable service under 

21 section 8411; and 

22 ‘‘(B) after the date of enactment of this 

23 paragraph, becomes employed as an employee 

24 or becomes a Member covered under this chapVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:33 Aug 28, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4833.IS S4833

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4833 IS

1 ter performing service which is creditable serv2 ice under section 8411.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 

CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION 

By authority ofSedion 68-201-115 Tennessee Code Annotated 

The Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board Declares 

Memphis and Shelby County Tennessee 

and aU Included Municipalities 

is 

exempt from the provisions of the 

Tennessee Air Quality Act as found in 

Chapter 101 of Title 68, Tennessee Code Annotated 

subject to such limitations as established by the board pursuant 

to Board Order No. tl-004 passed 

by the Board on this the 13" day of June 2012 

Air Pollution Control Board Members of the State of Tennessee
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-8 (Nos. 333-60430, 333-38696, 333-76804, 333-92232, 333-131697and 333-134654) and in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87858, 333-111306 and 333-134965) of AllosTherapeutics, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2007 relating to the financialstatements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP
| Denver, Colorado |
|------------------|
| March 12, 2007   |

 

----
Exhibit 12.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: December 18, 2009
    
    /s/ Yeung Chu Kwong, WilliamName:
    
    Yeung Chu Kwong, WilliamTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

JILL P. TELFER (State Bar No. 145450)

LAW OFFICES OF JILL P. TELFER

A Professional Corporation

331 “J” Street, Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 446-1916

Facsimile: (916) 446-1726

Attorney for Plaintiff 

MICHAEL ASBERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL ASBERRY,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, DOES 1-20

inclusive

 Defendants.

 

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

CASE NO. CIV S.-04-2467 LKK PAN 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO LIFT THE

PROTECTIVE ORDER AS TO THIRD

PARTY PERSONNEL DOCUMENTS

 Plaintiff Michael Asberry requests this Court to lift the June 8, 2005 Protective Order regarding

third party personnel documents of employees and/or former employees which plaintiff argues are

similarly situated to him. The subject documents were produced to Chambers on August 3, 2005 and

include records of Joel C., Olivia J., Herman L., Terence D., and Clyde M. The defendant does not

oppose the request so long as the subject documents may only be used in this litigation and that all

substantive evidentiary objections be maintained to the admission of the documents at the time of trial.

After considering the Joint Statement submitted by the parties, the Courts records and files in this

matter, and a review of the documents submitted to chambers, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

The COURT HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiff’s Request to Lift the Protective Order as to the

Documents submitted to Chambers so that the parties may use the documents during this litigation in

Case 2:04-cv-02467-LKK -PAN Document 65 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER -2-

discovery, motion practice and at trial, with the caveat that those documents may be filed and/or made

part of the record in this case in connection with any legitimate bona fide motion that may be necessary

and may be offered in evidence at trial subject to any substantive evidentiary objections. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 31, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02467-LKK -PAN Document 65 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-KSB/A1 of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A1 for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Martin Berns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Martin Berns
Martin Berns
Chief Executive Officer


April 21, 2005
Exhibit 10.14.2

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

SECOND AMENDMENT TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

PAUL L. BERNS

This SECOND AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Second
Amendment") is made and entered into as of March 2, 2011, by and between Allos Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and Paul L. Berns ("Employee").

RECITALS:

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into a Second Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated December 13, 2007 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, modifications are needed to bring the Employment Agreement into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are mutually acknowledged, the Company and Employee hereby agree as follows:





---





---



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement as of the date
first written above.

THE COMPANY:ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.By:

/s/ Marc H. GraboyesName:

Marc H. GraboyesTitle:

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and SecretaryEMPLOYEE:/s/ Paul L. Berns PAUL L. BERNS


Signature Page to Second Amendment to
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement

---



QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
  CORPORATE
    PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 16  GLOBAL INCORPORATED
    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
    OFFICER
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
      11/14/2006
    Date

By:

/s/  Gordon
    F. DuGanGordon
    F. DuGan
    Chief Executive Officer   Form 10-Q
      11/14/2006
    Date

By:

/s/  Mark
    J. DeCesarisMark
    J. DeCesaris
    acting Chief Financial Officer
No. 55267.

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 149677-K, etc. (St. Albans, Vt.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial Government counsel conceded that the issue is the same as that involved in *United States*v. *Myers & Co.*(11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 409, T. D. 39322). On the record presented it was held that 10 percent of the total weight of the imported merchandise is dutiable at 5 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1530 (a), as modified by the trade agreement with Paraguay (T. D. 51649), and that the balance thereof is dutiable at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 701.
No. 52650.

protests 104220-K, etc. (New York).

#### Dextar Fur Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-816 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Status of Forces 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BURKINA FASO 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Ouagadougou February 20, 2006 and 

August 16, 2007 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
BURKINA FASO 

Defense: Status of Forces 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes 

 at Ouagadougou February 20, 2006 and 

 August 16, 2007; 

 Entered into force August 16, 2007.
(Reap. Dec. 10131)

#### Naftone International Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 799761-7/9.

(Decided December 26, 1961)

*Eugene R. Piehrell*for the plaintiff.

*William H. Orrielo, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the merchandise marked “A” and initialed JJO by Examiner J. J. O’Oonnor, Jr., consists of O-P Developer, a photographic coal-tar chemical, appraised on the basis of United States value, as that value is defined in Section 402(a), Value (Alternative), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the United States value found by the Appraiser was $0.3742 per package.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the correct United States value, as defined aforesaid, is $0.30 per package.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that this appeal for re-appraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold United States value, as that value is defined in section 402a(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value for the importation covered by the appeal herein is $0.30 per package.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
# C_2007088EN.01003001.xml

| 21.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/30

---

Notice inviting applications for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in one or more of blocks/part-blocks D9, D18b, E10, E14, E15b, E17c and E18b of the Dutch continental shelf

(2007/C 88/11)

The Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in blocks/part-blocks D9, D18b, E10, E14, E15b, E17c and E18b as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).

Mijnbouwregeling

Staatscourant

With reference to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (1) and the publication required by Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit an application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in blocks/part-blocks D9, D18b, E10, E14, E15b, E17c and E18b.

1

Mijnbouwwet

Staatsblad

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to the Minister for Economic Affairs, for the attention of the Director for the Energy Market, Bezuidenhoutseweg 30, The Hague, Netherlands, and marked ‘personal’. Applications submitted after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

Official Journal of the European Union

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than twelve months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained from the following telephone number: (31-70) 379 7382.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 30.6.1994, p. 3.

1

---
No. 54091.

#### George M. Graves Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 532365-G, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID MARSHALL GATES, No. CIV S-04-2632 MCE JFM P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

WARDEN MARSHALL,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an

application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On July 22, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which

contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days.

///

Case 2:04-cv-02632-MCE-JFM Document 8 Filed 09/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 22, 2005,

are adopted in full; and 

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local

Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

DATE: September 1, 2005

_________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/gate2632.800

Case 2:04-cv-02632-MCE-JFM Document 8 Filed 09/01/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DELONZO GALLON, No. CIV-S-04-2422 MCE/PAN P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

D. L. RUNNELS, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On August 31, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-02422-MCE -PAN Document 6 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 31, 2005,

are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim

upon which relief could be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

DATE: October 21, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02422-MCE -PAN Document 6 Filed 10/24/05 Page 2 of 2