alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Anmore,
      Inc., for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2007, I, Giorgio Saumat, Chief Executive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Anmore, Inc. hereby certify pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.
Such
      Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ended June 30, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Anmore, Inc.




Dated:
      August 9, 2007




**ANMORE,
      INC.**




By:
            */s/
                Giorgio Saumat*
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
Before the Third Division,

December 5, 1957

No. 61392.

protests 253785-K, etc. (New York).

#### Browne Vintners Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
#### Charles E. McConnell v. J. Karantinos.

180 So. 23.

Division B.

Opinion Filed March 11, 1938.

*776*Butt & Akeridge,*for Appellant;

*Crofton & Wilson,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted upon the transcript of record, and the briefs and argument of counsel, the court finds no reversible error in the record, and the order appealed from is affirmed upon the authority of Gove v. Nautilus Hotel Company, 68 Fla. 490, 67 So. 112; Tide Water Construction Company v. Monroe County, 107 Fla. 648, 146 So. 209, and Webster v. Clark, 34 Fla. 633, 16 So. 601.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-919 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CULTURAL PROPERTY 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CAMBODIA 

Signed at Phnom Penh September 19, 2003 

and 

Memorandum of Understanding Amending and 

Extending the Memorandum of Understanding 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Phnom Penh August 14 and 26, 2008 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 CAMBODIA 

 Cultural Property 

Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Phnom Penh September 19, 2003; 

Entered into force September 19, 2003. 

And memorandum of understanding amending and 

 extending the memorandum of understanding. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Phnom Penh 

 August 14 and 26, 2008; 

Entered into force August 26, 2008.
Sheet1

Notes: (1) We are now sampling on a monthly schedule for MACT purposes and still a quarterly schedule for state reporting. The only tests included in this report are the quarterly tests because these are the only ones with monitors, inlets, and outlets run together. (2) Since we are testing by method 13 now for outlets and monitors I have reported total fluoride. (3) Evolution continues to be biased high by the B3/B2 crossover duct.

Actual losses in lbs/ton of aluminum produced:

109Mon108Mon B2 unit B3 unit B5 unit B5 inlet B2 inlet B3 inletEvolution Q1_99 0.85 3.63 0.633 2.82 0.08 88.45 80.38 76.70 87.18 Q2_99 1.55 2.37 0.795 3.41 1.01 64.73 75.26 58.29 70.82 Q3_99 1.29 3.50 0.563 5.54 0.47 69.96 73.33 65.36 73.48 Q4_99 0.85 3.00 0.466 3.07 0.21 72.04 76.32 74.30 75.46 **Year_99 1.14**  **3.13 0.61**  **3.71 0.44**  **73.80 76.32**  **68.66 76.74** 

Hooding and Unit Efficiency, %:

109_hood108_hoodB2_unit B3_unit B5_unit Plant_hoodPlant_unit Q1_99 99.05 95.68 99.22 96.45 99.91 97.70 99.08 Q2_99 97.66 96.95 98.95 94.47 98.46 97.38 97.76 Q3_99 98.19 95.44 99.24 92.19 99.33 97.09 97.88 Q4_99 98.83 96.22 99.39 96.03 99.71 97.79 98.91 **Year_99 98.43**  **96.07 99.20**  **94.78 99.35**  **97.49 98.41** 

Page 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4395]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-333-000]


High Island Offshore System L.L.C.; Notice of Tariff Filing

March 6, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 1, 2007, High Island Offshore System 
L.L.C. (HIOS) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, Fifth Revised Sheet No. 11, with an effective 
date of April 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d4b485f4e4263616463685e787d7d627f794d6b687f6e236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="42040710010d2c2e2b2c27113732322d303602242730216c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4395 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 21**

 

Subsidiaries of theRegistrant

 
| **Legal Name of Entity**           | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Organization** | ** ** | **Ownership Interest** |
|---------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|
| Frederick County  Bancorp, Inc. (registrant) |       | Maryland                                   |       |                        |
| Frederick  County Bank                            |       | Maryland                                   |       | 100%                        |
| FCBI  Statutory Trust I                           |       | Connecticut                                |       | 100% of voting securities   |
| FCB  Holdings, Inc.                          |       | Maryland                                   |       | 100%                        |
| FCB  Hagerstown, LLC                              |       | Maryland                                   |       | 100%                        |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VOICESTREAM
WIRELESS CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS
OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         235,433
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,482
<INVENTORY>                                     63,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               410,576
<PP&E>                                       1,216,462
<DEPRECIATION>                                 284,670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,221,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          203,085
<BONDS>                                      2,011,451
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,095,539
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,221,913
<SALES>                                         78,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               475,529
<CGS>                                          136,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  798,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,964
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                37,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (454,739)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (454,739)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (454,739)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (4.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.75)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

(Bar Docket No. 5140)

No. 48,630

#### *In re*The Complaint made against Charles G. Stewart by the State Board of Law Examiners

(559 P. 2d 814)

ORDER OF PUBLIC CENSURE

Whereas, In a proceeding conducted by the State Board of Law Examiners to inquire into the complaint of alleged professional misconduct by Charles G. Stewart, and

Whereas, Following a full hearing as to such complaint, the State Board of Law Examiners found that Charles G. Stewart, Grainfield, Kansas, after filing a claim for a secured creditor against a bankruptcy estate, was appointed trustee of the estate, which resulted in a conflict of interest. Respondent failed to withdraw as attorney for the creditor or to notify it of the necessity of filing an amended claim, and later as trustee he filed objections to the creditors claim. The conduct of respondent constitutes a violation of DR 2-110 (A) (2) relating to withdrawal from employment, and of DR 5-105 (A) and DR 5-105 (C) relating to conflict of interest (214 Kan. Ixxxii, Ixxxvi), and

Whereas, The State Board of Law Examiners has made a written recommendation to this Court that said Charles G. Stewart be disciplined by “Public Censure” as provided by Rule 203 *(a)*(3) (220 Kan. xxviii [Adv. Sheet No. 2]), and

Whereas, In accordance with Rule 213 (c) (220 Kan. xxxiii [Adv. Sheet No. 2]), a copy of the report, findings and recommendations of the Board was mailed to respondent on November 18, 1976, along with a citation directing respondent to file with the court either a statement that he did not wish to file exceptions, or his exceptions to the report, and

Whereas, Under date of December 8, 1976, the respondent filed his response to the citation, stating that he did not wish to file exceptions to the report, findings and recommendations, and

Whereas, Upon consideration of the record and being fully advised in the premises, the Court accepts the report, findings and recommendations of the State Board of Law Examiners.

It is, therefore, by the Court Considered, Ordered and Adjudged that the said Charles G. Stewart be and he is hereby disciplined *447by public censure and that he pay the costs of this proceeding. It is further ordered that this Order of Public Censure be published in the official Kansas Reports.

By Order of the Court, dated this 1st day of February, 1977.
No. 62607.

#### Gematex Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 315424-K (New York).

*453Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that an item of 150 wood roosters appearing on the 13th sheet of the invoice is similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of Abstract 55996, the claim at 16% percent under paragraph 412, as modified, *supra,*was sustained. It was further stipulated that 520 pieces of brass candlesticks had been withdrawn from warehouse after the effective date of T. D. 52739. The claim at 15 percent under paragraph 339, as modified, *supra,*was, therefore, sustained as to said items.
No. 51747.

#### Protests 128418-K, etc., of Coty, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Folio-wing the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002.**In connection with the Quarterly Report of HLI Operating Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended July 31, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Curtis J. Clawson, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Curtis J. Clawson           Curtis J. Clawson *President and Chief Executive Officer*September 13, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY MARSHALL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1694 LKK EFB P

vs.

SHERIFF GARY R. STANTON,

et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On August 17, 2006, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint and gave plaintiff 30 days

to file an amended complaint. The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an

amended complaint or otherwise responded to that order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

////

Case 2:04-cv-01694-LKK -EFB Document 107 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 5, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-01694-LKK -EFB Document 107 Filed 10/05/06 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4894 

To urge the United Nations to abolish the position of Special Rapporteur 

on unilateral coercive measures and to withhold United States funding 

for such position. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To urge the United Nations to abolish the position of Special 

Rapporteur on unilateral coercive measures and to withhold United States funding for such position. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF POLICY. 

4 It is the policy of the United States to seek the aboli5 tion of the position within the United Nations of Special 

6 Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive 

7 measures on the enjoyment of human rights. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4894 IS

1 SEC. 2. DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS TO ABOLISH OR DEFUND 

2 THE POSITION OF SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR. 

3 The Permanent Representative of the United States 

4 to the United Nations shall use the voice, vote, and influ5 ence of the United States to abolish or defund the United 

6 Nations position of Special Rapporteur on the negative im7 pact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of 

8 human rights. 

9 SEC. 3. WITHHOLDING OF UNITED STATES FUNDING FOR 

10 SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—The United States is prohibited 

12 from providing any funding to the United Nations that 

13 will be used for the Special Rapporteur on the negative 

14 impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment 

15 of human rights (or any similar successor entity). 

16 (b) ASSESSED CONTRIBUTIONS.—Section 114(a) of 

17 the Department of State Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 

18 1984 and 1985 (Public Law 98–164; 22 U.S.C. 287e 

19 note) is amended— 

20 (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

21 end; 

22 (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at 

23 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

24 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

25 ‘‘(8) 25 percent of the amount budgeted for the 

26 Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilatVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:43 Aug 29, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4894.IS S4894

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4894 IS

1 eral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human 

2 rights (or any similar successor entity).’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
|  | (1)  | the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q      of Debut Broadcasting Corporation Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,      2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)  | the information contained in the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fairly      presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of Debut Broadcasting Corporation  Inc. |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Steven Ludwig                                  |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Steven Ludwig                                     |
| Title: | Principal Executive Officer andDirector |
| Date:  | May 13, 2009                                 |
|   |                                                   |
| By:    | /s/ Sariah Hopkins                           |   |
| Name:  | Sariah Hopkins                                    |
| Title: | Principal Financial Officer             |
| Date:  | May 13, 2009                                 |

----
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of International Monetary Systems, Ltd.
("Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), I, Donald M. Mardak, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Donald M.
Mardak





Donald M.
Mardak


Chief
Executive Officer





April 7,
2009











This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.