alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10134)

#### Ufinindo Int’l Corp. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 940071, etc.

(Decided December 28, 1961)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiffs.

*WilUam S. Orrieh, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in the schedule attached to and made a part of this decision, present the question of the proper value for dutiable purposes of certain household enamelware.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact, wherein it has been agreed as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, that the merchandise and issues in the above named appeals for reappraisement are the same in all material respects as those in *Indussa Corp.*v. *United States,*47 C.C.P.A. (Customs) — C.A.D. 736 and that the record in C.A.D. 736 be incorporated with the record in these cases.

> IT IS EURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that said merchandise is on the final list of products published as T.D. 54521 and is subject to valuation under the alternative value provisions of section 402a.

> IT IS EURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market values or the prices at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States were the appraised *per se*unit prices for each article less 40% discount, plus 10 per centum Belgian home sales tax and packing charges, and that there was no higher export value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that said appeals be submitted on this stipulation.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(c)), as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis of value for the merchandise in issue and that said value is the appraised *per se*unit prices for each article, less 40 per centum discount, plus 10 per centum Belgian home sales tax and packing charges. As to any other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 12 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarter  ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper,
Jr.,  President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 14, 2005
<page>
											 EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partner-
ship.






By:	/s/Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:		President

Date:		March 31, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11419-11420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4551]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10821 and <greek-i> 10822]


Alabama Disaster Number AL-00007

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1687-DR), dated 3/3/2007.

[[Page 11420]]

    Incident: Severe Storms and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 3/1/2007.

DATES: Effective Date: 3/6/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 5/2/2007.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/3/2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Alabama, dated 3/3/2007 is hereby amended 
to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Dale, Dallas, Henry, Montgomery, Wilcox,
Contiguous Counties:
    Alabama: Autauga, Barbour, Bullock, Butler, Chilton, Clarke, 
Elmore, Houston, Lowndes, Macon, Marengo, Monroe, Perry
    Georgia: Clay, Early

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008.)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-4551 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00133-CR

Leah Louise Allen

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1241820D)

December 5, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 87

Dockets.Justia.com
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Periodic Financial Reports**     I, Robert J. Messey, Vice President of Arch Western Resources, LLC, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the“Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and     (2) information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Arch Western Resources, LLC.                                                           /s/ Robert J. Messey   Robert J. Messey   Vice President   Date: August 11, 2006
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00098-CV

______________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF

K.D.F. AND K.D.F., CHILDREN

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV34378

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss the pending appeal in this matter,

representing to this Court that the parties have reached a full and final settlement. In such a case,

no real controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy, the appeal is moot.

We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: January 14, 2010

Date Decided: January 15, 2010
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD J. ESTA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2584 DFL GGH P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

GOVERNOR’S OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed March 22, 2005, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an

amended complaint. In the March 22nd order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in

his complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended

complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

For the reasons given in the March 22, 2005, order, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 

Case 2:04-cv-02584-DFL-GGH Document 7 Filed 05/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

DATED: 5/23/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

esta2584.fta

Case 2:04-cv-02584-DFL-GGH Document 7 Filed 05/23/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL JAMES LONGORIO, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2650 DFL KJM P

vs.

JAGOT, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action

filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed May 18, 2005, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed

with leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint.

The amended complaint states a cognizable claim for relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). If the allegations of the amended complaint are proven,

plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Jagot, Swearingen,

Nergen, Sihota, Peterson. 

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff five USM-285 forms, one summons,

an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed July 22, 2005.

Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM Document 8 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;

b. One completed summons;

c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 1

above; and 

d. Six copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed July 22, 2005. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States

Marshal to serve the above-named defendants as provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4

without payment of costs. 

DATED: December 20, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

long2650.1amd(ac.7.22)

Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM Document 8 Filed 12/21/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL JAMES LONGORIO, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2650 DFL KJM P

vs.

JAGOT, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 completed summons form

 completed USM-285 forms

 copies of the 

 Amended Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM Document 8 Filed 12/21/05 Page 3 of 3
No. 51449.

#### Protests 110869-K, etc., of Denebeim Distilling Co. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of the various barrels, casks, packages, etc., was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination, because of breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gaugers’ returns as verified by the affidavits of the importer. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Before the Second Division,

January 14, 1943

No. 47913.

#### Protest 647306-G of Orchid Importing Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson,' J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) certain of the harvest hats in question were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those imported or withdrawn from warehouse subsequent to the Netherlands Trade Agreement were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under paragraph 1504 and said T. D. 48075, as claimed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUANARD D. ROBINSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2082 GEB KJM P

vs.

M. CRY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has

filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On May 5, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

Case 2:04-cv-02082-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 06/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 5, 2005,

are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

Dated: June 9, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02082-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 06/09/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Molecular Imaging Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for
the year ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Paul J. Crowe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Anthony R. Turnbull, Vice President, Finance of the Company, respectively, do
each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ PAUL J. CROWE                                             
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Paul J. Crowe, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: September 28, 2003



|/s/ ANTHONY R. TURNBULL                     
|--------------------------------------------
|Anthony R. Turnbull, Vice President, Finance



Dated: September 28, 2003



[A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Molecular Imaging Corporation and will be retained by Molecular Imaging Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
6746

#### STATE v. TODD.

*Ruled by case of State*v. *Graham, post,*116.

Before F. Barron Grier, Special Judge, Newberry,

June term, 1907.

Affirmed.

Indictment against Tom Todd for violating dispensary law. From sentence on verdict of guilty., defendant appeals.

*Messrs. Blease & Dominick,*for appellant.

*Solicitor R. A. Cooper,*contra.

February 17, 1908.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The defendant, Tom Todd, was tried and convicted at the June term, 1907, of the Court of General Sessions for Newberry County for violation of the dispensary law.

The appeal in this case, being based upon same grounds as the appeal in *State*v. *Graham,*is dismissed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion therein.

The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.
#### Genevieve B. McGowin v. W. T. McGowin

173 So. 927.

Opinion Filed March 22, 1937.

*E. B. Drumright,*for Appellant;

*L. Grady Burton,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Givens v. Givens, 121 Fla. 270, 163 So. 574.

*248It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.
No. 64893.

#### J. Einstein, Inc., and F. L. Kraemer Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 323568-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon fabrics similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002.**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hayes LemmerzInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended October 31, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Curtis J. Clawson, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Curtis J. Clawson           Curtis J. Clawson *President and Chief Executive Officer*December 8, 2005
# C_2007041EN.01001701.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/17

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628 of 24 October 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to national regional investment aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 41/12)

| Aid No | XR 30/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Lithuania |
| Region | Klaipėdos |
| Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement | Nacionalinės regioninės pagalbos teikimo Klaipėdos laisvojoje ekonominėje zonoje schema |
| Legal basis | Lietuvos Respublikos laisvųjų ekonominių zonų įstatymas (Žin., 1995, Nr. 59-1462); Lietuvos Respublikos Klaipėdos laisvosios ekonominės zonos įstatymas (Žin., 1996, Nr. 92-2143); Lietuvos Respublikos ūkio ministro įsakymas (Žin., 2007, Nr. 11-462) |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Annual budget | LTL 20 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | 50 % |
| In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 19.1.2007 |
| Duration | 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for regional investment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Lietuvos Respublikos Ūkio ministerija |
| Gedimino pr. 38/2 |
| LT-01104 Vilnius |
| tel. (370-5) 262 38 63; (370-5) 262 65 84 |
| faks. (370-5) 262 39 74 |
| El. paštas: kanc@ukmin.lt |

Aid No

XR 30/07

Member State

Lithuania

Region

Klaipėdos

Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement

Nacionalinės regioninės pagalbos teikimo Klaipėdos laisvojoje ekonominėje zonoje schema

Legal basis

Lietuvos Respublikos laisvųjų ekonominių zonų įstatymas (Žin., 1995, Nr. 59-1462); Lietuvos Respublikos Klaipėdos laisvosios ekonominės zonos įstatymas (Žin., 1996, Nr. 92-2143); Lietuvos Respublikos ūkio ministro įsakymas (Žin., 2007, Nr. 11-462)

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Annual budget

LTL 20 million

Maximum aid intensity

50 %

In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

19.1.2007

Duration

31.12.2013

Economic sectors

All sectors eligible for regional investment aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Lietuvos Respublikos Ūkio ministerija

Gedimino pr. 38/2

LT-01104 Vilnius

tel. (370-5) 262 38 63; (370-5) 262 65 84

faks. (370-5) 262 39 74

El. paštas: kanc@ukmin.lt

Internet address of the publication of the aid scheme

http://www.ukmin.lt/lt/investicijos/

Other information

—

---