alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007188EN.01000501.xml

| 11.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/5

---

Notice concerning anti-dumping measures on imports of silicon originating in Russia

(2007/C 188/05)

By its judgment of 14 March 2007 in Case T-107/04, the Court of First Instance of the European Communities annulled Council Regulation (EC) No 2229/2003 (1) imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of silicon originating in Russia, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 821/2004 (2), in so far as it concerns silicon imported into the European Community by:

1

2

| — | Aluminium Silicon Mill Products (ASMP) GmbH, |
| --- | --- |

—

Aluminium Silicon Mill Products (ASMP) GmbH,

and manufactured by the following related producers in Russia:

| — | SKU LLC, Sual-Kremny-Ural, Kamensk, Ural Region, Russia, |
| --- | --- |

—

SKU LLC, Sual-Kremny-Ural, Kamensk, Ural Region, Russia,

| — | ZAO KREMNY, Irkutsk, Irkutsk Region, Russia. |
| --- | --- |

—

ZAO KREMNY, Irkutsk, Irkutsk Region, Russia.

Consequently, the definitive anti-dumping duties paid pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2229/2003 on imports into the European Community of silicon falling within CN code 2804 69 00 imported and manufactured by the above-mentioned companies under TARIC additional code A465, and the provisional duties definitively collected in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2229/2003, should be reimbursed. The reimbursement must be requested from national customs authorities in accordance with applicable customs legislation.

As a consequence of the judgment of 14 March 2007, silicon imported into the European Community by Aluminium Silicon Mill Products GmbH and manufactured by SKU LLC, Sual-Kremny-Ural, Kamensk, Ural Region, Russia and ZAO KREMNY, Irkutsk, Irkutsk Region, Russia are no longer subject to the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2229/2003 nor consequently are these companies any longer bound by the undertaking accepted by Commission Decision 2004/445/EC (3) in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of silicon originating in Russia.

3

---

(1)  OJ L 339, 24.12.2003, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 114.

3

---
<page>
									EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
<page> likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of Demeter's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.




Date:   March 15, 2004      /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman
	Jeffrey A. Rothman
						 President,
                               Demeter Management Corporation,
						 general partner of the registrant
EXHIBIT 6

CONSENT OF APPOINTED ACTUARY

I consent to the use and incorporation by reference of the
following report in this Annual Form 40-F of Sun Life Financial Inc.:

My report dated February 16, 2011 on the valuation of the policy
liabilities of Sun Life Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries for its consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and their change in the consolidated statements of operations for the years then ended, in accordance with accepted
actuarial practice, including selection of appropriate assumptions and methods.

Dated February 16, 2011



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/S/  Lesley Thomson                  
|                                       
|Lesley Thomson                         
|                                       
|Fellow, Canadian Institute of Actuaries
|Toronto, Canada
(Reap. Dec. 8709)

Entry No. 11304, etc.

#### C. J. Van Houten *&*Zoon, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 11, 1956)

*Barnes, Richardson, & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation reading as follows :

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that

> 1. The merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of chocolate bars and other chocolate articles exported from Holland, the same in all material respects as those in *Bluefries New York, Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 8470, wherein it was held that cost of production as defined in Sec. 402 (f), Tariff Act of 1930, was the proper basis of value.

> 2. The record in said Reap. Dec. 8470 may be incorporated herein.

> 3. At the time of exportation of the merchandise involved in the appeals for reappraisement listed in said Schedule A, there was no foreign value or export value or United States value for such or similar merchandise as defined in Sec. 402, Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, and the cost of production is therefore the proper basis of value.

> 4. The cost of production, as defined in Sec. 402 (f) (1), (2), (3) and (4) of the Tariff Act of 1930, for the chocolate bars and other chocolate articles listed in Schedule B, attached hereto and made a part hereof, is as set forth in said Schedule B.

> 5. The appeals for reappraisement listed in said Schedule A are submitted on this stipulation and are limited to the items set forth in said Schedule B, and abandoned as to all other items.

On the agreed facts, I hold that the proper basis for appraisement of the “chocolate bars and other chocolate articles” in question is cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for these various items is as set forth in schedule “B,” attached hereto and made a part hereof.

As to all other merchandise covered by the shipments involved herein, these appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgement will be rendered accordingly.

*599Schedule “B”
No. 63144.

#### Liebermann Waelchli *& Co.,*New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/6972 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Exhibit 10.3


 


Chart Acquisition Corp.


555 5th Avenue, 19th
Floor


New York, NY 10017


 


[●]


March 12, 2015                      


 


		Re:	Extension of Promissory Notes



 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to those certain promissory
notes (collectively the “Notes”) dated as of February 10, 2014, September 9, 2014 and February 4, 2015, by and among
Chart Acquisition Corp. (the “Maker”) and [●] (the “Payee”).


 


The Maker and the Payee hereby agree that the
maturity dates of the Notes shall be extended to the earlier of: (i) June 13, 2015 and (ii) the date on which the Maker consummates
its initial business combination.


 


This letter agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflicts of law principles.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	CHART ACQUISITION CORP. 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Title:	
	 	Name:	 


 


Acknowledged and accepted by: 


 


	[●]	 
	 	 	 
	By:		 
	Title:	 	 
	Name:
No. 53549.

protests 139627-K, etc. (Tampa).

#### Miami Importing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                           SUNRISE U.S.A. INCORPORATED
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


I, Omar G. Barrientos,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of Sunrise U.S.A.
Incorporated  (the "Company"),  hereby certify that the  accompanying  report on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,2004 and filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  pursuant  to  Section  13(a)  of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the  "Report") by the Company  fully  complies
with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects,  the financial operations and results of operations of
the Company.

Date:  May 12, 2005

By:  /s/ OMAR G. BARRIENTOS
   ----------------------------
   Omar G. Barrientos
   Chief Executive and
   Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4636]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending March 2, 
2007

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: OST-2007-27396.
    Date Filed: February 26, 2007.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

TC23 Middle East--TC3 Resolutions. (Memo 0305)
Minutes: TC32 Middle East--TC3 Resolutions (Memo 0317)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.

    Docket Number: OST-2007-27397.
    Date Filed: February 26, 2007.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

TC23 Africa--TC3.
Areawide Resolutions (Memo 0314)
Minutes: TC23 Middle East, Africa--TC3 Passenger Tariff Coordinating 
Conference (Memo 0321)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.

    Docket Number: OST-2007-27424.
    Date Filed: February 27, 2007.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

TC23 Middle East--South Asian Subcontinent.
Resolutions and Fares Tables (Memo 0309)
Minutes: TC32 Middle East--TC3 Resolutions (Memo 0317)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.

    Docket Number: OST-2007-27425.
    Date Filed: February 27, 2007.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

TC23 Middle East--South West Pacific.
Resolutions and Fares Tables (Memo 0304)
Minutes: TC32 Middle East--TC3 Resolutions (Memo 0317)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.

    Docket Number: OST-2007-27426.
    Date Filed: February 27, 2007.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

TC23 Middle East--South West Pacific.
Resolutions and Fares Tables (Memo 0304)
Minutes: TC32 Middle East--TC3 Resolutions (Memo 0317)
    Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.

    Docket Number: OST-2007-27450.
    Date Filed: March 1, 2007.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

Resolution 015h.
USA Add-ons between USA and UK (Memo 0202)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E7-4636 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Before the Second Division,

April 4, 1945

No. 50103.

#### Protests 93190-K, etc., of T. A. Desmond & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

# AGENCY:

NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Completion of Panel Review of the final remand determination of the antidumping duty administrative review and determination not to revoke made by the U.S. International Trade Administration, in the matter of Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico, Secretariat File No. USA/MEX-2001-1904-05. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Order of the Binational Panel dated January 16, 2007, affirming the final remand determination described above was completed on January 16, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Caratina L. Alston, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On January 16, 2007, the Binational Panel issued an order which affirmed the final remand determination of the United States International Trade Administration (“ITA”) concerning Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico. The Secretariat was instructed to issue a Notice of Completion of Panel Review on the 31st day following the issuance of the Notice of Final Panel Action, if no request for an Extraordinary Challenge was filed. No such request was filed. Therefore, on the basis of the Panel Order and Rule 80 of the                     *Article 1904 Panel Rules*, the Panel Review was completed and the panelists discharged from their duties effective March 5, 2007.                 

      ( print page 11848)    
Dated: March 9, 2007. 

Caratina L. Alston, 

United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.

 [FR Doc. E7-4653 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,



As Adopted Pursuant To



Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002



I, Fouad Kallamni, Principal Executive
and Accounting Officer of Premier Beverage Group Corp. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | • | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







| | /s/ Fouad Kallamni                         
| | -------------------------------------------
| | Fouad Kallamni                             
| | President                                  
| | (Principal Executive and financial Officer)
| | May 30, 2014
No. 64175.

protests 59/13731, etc. (New York).

#### I. B. Cohen & Sons Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. S. *H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), I, James R. Latimer, III, Chief Executive Officer of Cano Petroleum, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:      May 13,   2011 | /s/   James R. Latimer, III |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                                         |                             |
|                                                         | James   R. Latimer, III     |
|                                                         | Chief   Executive Officer        |

 

----
#### Howard H. Sand v. W. L. Freelund, *et al.*

173 So. 927 .

Opinion Filed February 26, 1937.

*Kunkel & White,*for Appellant;

*John M. Murrell, E. F. P. Brigham*and *Bart A. Riley,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of record of the decree herein, and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given, in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL CARTER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 347 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.