alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52007BP0124(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007BP0124(01)

**1. European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2005 (C6-0398/2006 - 2006/2165(DEC)) **

*
Official Journal 074 E , 20/03/2008 P. 0250 - 0251 *

1.

European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2005 (C6-0398/2006 — 2006/2165(DEC))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2005 [1],

- having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the final annual accounts of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2005, together with the Agency's replies [2],

- having regard to the Council's recommendation of 27 February 2007 (5711/2007 — C6-0080/2007),

- having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 276 thereof,

- having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [3], and in particular Article 185 thereof,

- having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency [4], and in particular Article 49 thereof,

- having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [5] and, in particular, Article 94 thereof,

- having regard to Rule 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0121/2007),

1. Grants the executive director of the European Aviation Safety Agency discharge for the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2005;

2. Sets out its observations in the resolution below;

3. Instructs its President to forward this decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the executive director of the European Aviation Safety Agency, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

[1] OJ C 266, 31.10.2006, p. 10.

[2] OJ C 312, 19.12.2006, p. 6.

[3] OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

[4] OJ L 240, 7.9.2002, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1701/2003 (OJ L 243, 27.9.2003, p. 5).

[5] OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

--------------------------------------------------
No. 47411.

#### Protest 58758-K of Mason Bros. & Tarlin (Boston).

*386Opinion by

Dallinoer, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel entered into at the hearing, the Christmas-tree bulbs in question were held properly taxable at *%*of 1 cent per pound as claimed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN R. SCHRUBB, SR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2706 MCE JFM P

vs.

C. FINN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On April 21, 2005, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. However, this civil

rights action was closed on March 16, 2005 pursuant to plaintiff’s March 7, 2005, request for

voluntary dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by plaintiff

since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings.

Plaintiff is advised that he may file a new action, and the Clerk of the Court will

be directed to send plaintiff the forms necessary to file a new § 1983 action. However, plaintiff

is cautioned that if he chooses to file a new action and later moves for voluntary dismissal of that

second action, it will serve as an adjudication upon the merits pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(a)(1). (See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(d) concerning potential liability for costs.) 

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02706-MCE -JFM Document 11 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the forms necessary to file a

new civil rights action; and

2. Plaintiff’s April 21, 2005 amended complaint shall be disregarded.

DATED: May 6, 2005.

001; schr2706.58

Case 2:04-cv-02706-MCE -JFM Document 11 Filed 05/09/05 Page 2 of 2
T o w ho it m a y c on c e r n :

A s a c on ce r n e d c iti ze n o f t h e S a n J o a qu i n V a ll e y I a m t r oub l e d by t h e f a c t t h e E P A i s g r a nd f

a t h e r i ng i n

t h e po w e r p l a n t i n A v e n a l

, C A

. T h e S a n J o a qu i n v a l l e y i s a r e g i on t h a t a l r ea d y h a s h i gh ca s e s o f a s t h m a

a nd h a s m u lti p l e c it i e s i n t h e t op 10 o f b a d a i r qu a lit y i n t h e n a ti on

. W it h t h i s b e i ng t h e ca s e

, t h e h i gh e s t

a nd n e w e s t s t a nd a r d s m u s t b e a dh e r e d t o i n o r d e r t o k ee p it s c iti ze n s h e a lt hy

. P l e a s e r ec on s i d e r a nd D O

NO T g r a nd f

a t h e r i n t h e A v e n a l po w e r p l a n t.

S i n ce r e l y

, A li c i a S o l o r i o

A v e n a l P o w e r P l a n t

A l i c i a S o l o r i o

t o :

R 9 A i r P e r mit s

04 / 12 / 2011 11 : 47 P M

H i d e D e t a i l s

F r o m: A li c i a S o l o r i o

T o : R 9 A i r P e r mit s @ E P A

H i s t o r y : T h i s m e s s a g e h a s b e e n f o r w a r d e d

. P a g e 1 o f 1

4 / 14 / 2011
### Page 1 of 3 Disposition Comments

Docket No: 

### FAA

- 20 1 6

- 1363 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 

### 20 1 5

- CE

- 0 4 0

- AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.:

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM



### N o C omments/Only Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are

required.

No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes,

lis t latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues

from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA

- IR

- M

- 8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one o

f the following :

If other, explain :

Commenter(s):

What change to the AD action is requested?

Why is the change requested or how is it justified?

Do we agree?

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD:

If PARTIALLY AGREE

, we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO

, we don’t agree because

ISSUE 2 : Select one of the following :

If other, explain :

Commenter(s):

What change to the AD action is requested?

Why is the change requested or how is it justified?

Do we agree?

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD:

If PARTIALLY AGREE

, we agree w ith because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If NO

, we don’t agree because

For additional issues, do uble

- click here

### Page 3 of 3 S ignature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.:

ASE Printed Name : Date

Branch M anager Date
# EUR-Lex - 52007DP0066 - EN

*|*

# 52007DP0066

**Decision of the European Parliament of 14 March 2007 on the number and numerical strength of the interparliamentary delegations **

*
Official Journal 301 E , 13/12/2007 P. 0102 - 0103 *

P6_TA(2007)0066

Number and numerical strength of the interparliamentary delegations

Decision of the European Parliament of 14 March 2007 on the number and numerical strength of the interparliamentary delegations

The European Parliament,

- having regard to Rule 188 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to its decision of 10 March 2004 on the number of interparliamentary delegations, delegations to joint parliamentary committees and delegations to parliamentary cooperation committees [1],

- having regard to its decision of 14 September 2004 on the numerical strength of the interparliamentary delegations, delegations to joint parliamentary committees and delegations to parliamentary cooperation committees [2],

1. Decides that the number of members on the following interparliamentary delegations shall be as follows:

Delegation for relations with the countries of South-East Europe | 25 members |

Delegation for relations with Belarus | 19 members |

Delegation for relations with Israel | 25 members |

Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council | 25 members |

Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) | 25 members |

Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries | 23 members |

Delegation for relations with the Gulf States, including Yemen | 19 members |

Delegation for relations with Iran | 21 members |

Delegation for relations with the United States | 42 members |

Delegation for relations with Canada | 22 members |

Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America | 26 members |

Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community | 20 members |

Delegation for relations with Mercosur | 28 members |

Delegation for relations with Japan | 28 members |

Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China | 39 members |

Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) | 22 members |

Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula | 17 members |

Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand | 24 members |

Delegation for relations with South Africa | 17 members |

2. Decides to split the Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) into three delegations and to lay down the number of members of each of them as follows:

Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia | 20 members |

Delegation for relations with India | 22 members |

Delegation for relations with Afghanistan | 16 members |

3. Instructs its President to forward this decision for information to the Council and the Commission.

[1] OJ C 102 E, 28.4.2004, p. 635.

[2] OJ C 140 E, 9.6.2005, p. 49.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 10.17A

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “First Amendment”), is dated as of April 30, 2014, by and between Demand Media, Inc. (the “Company”), and Julie Campistron (the “Executive”). Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement (as defined below). 

RECITALS 


	
A.
	
The Company and the Executive have entered into a second amended and restated employment agreement, dated November 1, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”). 





	
B.
	
The parties hereto wish to amend certain terms of the Employment Agreement. 




AMENDMENT 

The parties hereto hereby amend the Employment Agreement as follows, effective as of January 1, 2014 (the “Effective Date”). 

1. Section 2(b)(i). The phrase “$250,000 per annum” set forth in Section 2(b)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with “$297,500 per annum”. 

2. Section 2(b)(ii). Section 2(b)(ii) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: 

“[INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]” 

3. Section 2(b)(iv). Section 2(b)(iv) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end of the Section: 

“In addition, during the Employment Period the Executive shall be eligible to receive periodic equity incentive awards from the Company, including under any annual equity incentive program that may be established by the Company for its senior executives, as may be in effect from time to time.” 

4. Sections 4(a)(ii)(B). Section 4(a)(ii)(B) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: 

“[INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]” 

5. This First Amendment shall be and, as of its effectiveness, is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of, the Employment Agreement. 

6. Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 

 

 

 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executive’s hand and, pursuant to the authorization from the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, the Company has caused these presents to be executed in its name on its behalf, all as of the day and year first above written. 

 


	
DEMAND MEDIA, INC.,

	
a Delaware corporation

	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Courtney Montpas

	
Name: 
	
 
	
Courtney Montpas

	
Title:
	
 
	
EVP, People Operations 

	
 

	
“EXECUTIVE”

	
 

	
/s/ Julie Campistron

	
Julie Campistron
# C_2007182EN.01000501.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/5

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 182/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 10.5.2007 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 854/06 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Soutien de l'Agence de l'innovation industrielle au programme de R&D TVMSL |
| Legal basis | Régime N121/06 de soutien de l'Agence de l'innovation industrielle |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Research and development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant, Reimbursable grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 37,571 million |
| Intensity | 50 % |
| Duration | 1.5.2006-1.5.2010 |
| Economic sectors | Post and telecommunications, Electrical and optical equipment |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Agence de l'innovation industrielle |
| 195, boulevard Saint-Germain |
| F-75007 Paris |

Date of adoption of the decision

10.5.2007

Reference number of the aid

N 854/06

Member State

France

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Soutien de l'Agence de l'innovation industrielle au programme de R&D TVMSL

Legal basis

Régime N121/06 de soutien de l'Agence de l'innovation industrielle

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Research and development

Form of aid

Direct grant, Reimbursable grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 37,571 million

Intensity

50 %

Duration

1.5.2006-1.5.2010

Economic sectors

Post and telecommunications, Electrical and optical equipment

Name and address of the granting authority

Agence de l'innovation industrielle

195, boulevard Saint-Germain

F-75007 Paris

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
No. 57339.

protests 203430-K, etc. (New York).

#### Brenner Bros. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the  purposes of  complying  with  Section 1,  U.S.C.,  1950,  I, the
undersigned  Chairman  of the  Board  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  M.B.A.
Holdings,  Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify, based on my knowledge,  that the
Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 31,
2004 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information  contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the
Company.


Dated February 10, 2005


                           By /s/ Gaylen M. Brotherson
                             ----------------------------------------
                              Gaylen M. Brotherson
                              Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



                                       33
# EUR-Lex - 52007PC0783 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007PC0783

**Amended Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management as regards the multiannual financial framework /* COM/2007/0783 final */ **

*

*

[pic] | COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels, 5.12.2007

COM(2007) 783 final

Amended Proposal for a

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

amending the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management as regards the multiannual financial framework

(presented by the Commission)

Amended Proposal for a

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

amending the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management as regards the multiannual financial framework

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management[1], and in particular to Points 21, 22, first and second subparagraphs, and 23 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission[2],

Whereas:

(1) At the conciliation meeting on 23 November 2007 the two arms of the budgetary authority have agreed to provide part of the financing required for the European Global Navigation Satellite System GNSS programmes (EGNOS – GALILEO) by a revision of the multiannual financial framework 2007–2013 in accordance with Points 21, 22 and 23 of the Interinstitutional Agreement, so as to raise the ceilings for commitment appropriations under sub-Heading 1a for the years 2008 to 2013 by an amount of EUR 1 600 million in current prices. This raising will be offset by lowering the ceiling for commitment appropriations under Heading 2 for the year 2007 by the same amount.

(2) In order to keep an appropriate relationship between commitments and payments, the annual ceilings for payment appropriations will be adjusted. The adjustment will be neutral.

(3) Annex I of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management should therefore be amended accordingly[3],

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Annex I to the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Done at Brussels,

For the European Parliament For the Council

The President The President

ANNEX

FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK 2007-2013 (revised)

[pic]

[1] OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

[2] COM(2007) 549 final/2, 4.10.2007 as amended by COM(2007) 783 final.

[3] For that purpose, the figures resulting from the above agreement are converted into 2004 prices.
(Reap. Dec. 8695)

Entry No. 754764, etc.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided October 31, 1956)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

Tbe appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the items marked “A” and initialed VCS by Examiner V. C. Schug on the invoices covered by the reappraisement appeals listed in the attached Schedule A, which Schedule A is made a part of this stipulation, consist of printed linen fabric exported from England.

> That when said above-mentioned items marked “A” and initialed by the Examiner were exported from England such and similar merchandise was not being freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of England, nor was it being freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of England for exportation to the United States, nor was it being freely offered for sale in the principal market of the United States to United States purchasers.

> That the “cost of production” as defined in Section 402 (f) Tariff Act of 1930, for the above-mentioned items marked “A” and initialed by the Examiner was as follows:

> The costs of materials, labor, and fabrication (Section 402 (f) (1) Tariff Act of 1930) were as specified in the attached Schedule A.*

> To the said costs specified in Schedule A* there should be added 10% for usual general expenses (Section 402 (f) (2)); and then plus 5% and then plus 25% for profits (Section 402 (f) (4)). Said prices are net packed.

> Said reappraisement appeals specified in the attached Schedule A* are submitted for decision upon the agreed facts set forth in this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise identified by the items marked “A” and initialed VCS by Examiner V. C. Schug on the invoices, and that such values were as listed in schedule “B,”* hereto attached and made a part hereof.

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise, they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

*

 Schedule “A,” of the stipulation, and schedule “B," of the decision, omitted from printing.
No. 48536.

#### Protests 96035-K, etc., of Calarco Importing Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the Provolone cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706). In accordance therewith, and in view of Abstracts 40880 and 41794, the claim for ain allowance of 21⁄2 percent was sustained.