alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NIH Intramural DataBase
        - Comments / Requests

##  

### **Search NIH Intramural Research Reports**

### **All Annual Reports by an Institute or Center (by single year)**

*Required       

### **Retrieve a SINGLE Intramural Research Report**, using the project's Z-number

|         | Code                                                             | Project # | Year                                                                                                     |                                       |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| **Z--** | AAAGAIARATBCCLCOCPCTDADCDEDKEBESEYGMHDHGHLLMMDMHNRNSODRGSCTRXXxx |           | 20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014201320122011201020092008200720062005200420032002200120001999 | ***ALL three elements are required*** |

                        - Code = The Institute's twoletter report code (select from the list) 
                        - Project # = The individual Report'sproject number (e.g.,  *012345* )  
                        - Year = Select to obtain the Report for the project in that fiscal year 

### **Biospecimen Search**

### **NIH Researchers: Review Your Intramural Research Reports (Annual Reports)    [NIH Login required]**

                      - NIDB Searches
                      - NIDB Home
                      - Privacy Notice
                      - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
                      - National Institutes of Health
                      - HHS Vulnerability Disclosure
                      - USA.gov - Government Made Easy
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**MICHAEL STEVENS,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 43 EM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 2nd day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DISMISSED **. Only final orders of the Superior Court may be cha llenged through** 

**allocatur review. See**  **42 Pa.C.S. §724(a). The Superior Court’s remand or der, which** 

**specifically noted that jurisdiction was retained, was not final.**  **See Pa.R.A.P. 1112(b)** 

**(defining a final order, for purposes of allocatur, as one which “concludes an appeal,** 

**including an order that remands an appeal, . . . unle ss the appellate court remands and** 

**retains jurisdiction”).**
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Senior Judges Hodges , Overton and Retired Ju dge Stephens * Argued at Ches apeake, Virginia

BRIAN CHRISTOP HER DANIELS MEMORANDUM OPINION ** BY v. Record No. 1481-99-1 JUDGE WILLIAM H. HODGES JUNE 13, 2000 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT CO URT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH Alan E. Rose nblatt, Judge Theresa B. Berry (B erry, Ermlich, Lomax & Meixel, on brief), for appellant. Robert H. Anderson, III, Assistan t Attorney General (Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Upon his pleas of guilty, th e circuit court convicted Brian Christopher Dani els of robbery, ab duction, and use of a firearm in the commission of robbery. The court senten ced Daniels to concurrent fifty-year sentences on the ro bbery and abduction convictions and a three-year sentence on the firearm co nviction. On appeal, Daniel s contends that the court erred in imposing these

sentences. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part.

* Retired Judge J. Warren Stephens took part in the consideration of this case by designation pursuant to Code § 17.1-400, recodifying Code § 17-116.01.

** Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code § 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication.Daniels' maximum expo sure on the ab duction convic tion was ten

years. See Code §§ 18.2-10( e) and 18.2-47(A). Thus, the court erred in sentencing ap pellant to fifty years on this conviction. Accordingly, we vacate the fifty-year se ntence on th e abduction conviction and remand this ma tter to the tr ial court for resentencing. See Bell v. Co mmonwealth , 11 Va. App. 530, 534, 399 S.E.2d 450, 453 (1991). We find no error in the se ntences given Da niels on the robbery and firearm convictions. "It is well settled that when the maximum punishment is prescribed by statute, 'and the sentence [imposed] does not exceed that maximum, the sentence will not be overturned as being an abuse of discretion.'" Valentine v. Commonwealth , 18 Va. App. 334, 339, 443 S.E.2d 445, 448 (1994) (quoting Abdo v. Commonwealth , 218 Va. 473, 479, 237 S.E.2d 900, 903 (1977)). The sentences imposed by the trial court on these convictions were within the ranges set by the legislature. See Code §§ 18.2-53.1 and 18.2-58. It is within the trial court's purview to weigh any mitigating factors presented by Daniels. Accordingly, the court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Daniels on the robbery and firearm convictions. Affirmed in part, vacated and remanded in part.

- 2 -
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ John A. BardisJohn A. BardisChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
# Rule-Making Cover Sheet 

# ;J_O 10 . - 30? TO: Secretary of State ATTN: Administrative Procedure Officer 

### 1. 2. 3. 

### 4. 5. 

### 6. 7. Sta t e House Station 

### 101, Augusta, Maine 

### 04333 --**"'cc cPTCT** **!!'OI~- -­**  FlUNG . Agency: Department ofEnvironmental Protection 

## JUL 15 

## 2010 Agency umbrella and unit number : 06 - 096**L- ~~CR€TARV**  O F STATE Title of rule: Control ofVolatile Organic Compounds From Flexible Package Printing Chapter number assigned to 

### the rule: 

### 154 Date(s)/metbod(s) of notice: On March 3, 2010 

### in the Kennebce Journal, Portland Press Herald, Bangor Daily 

### News, Lewiston 

### Sun Jownal and Waterville Morning Sentinel. Date(s)/place(s) ofhearing(s): hearing Type : 

### X new rule 30-day written comment period , opportunity for public _partial amendment(s) of existing rule _suspension of existing rule 

### _repeal of 

### rule

_ emergency 

### rule _repeal and replace: complete replacement of existing chapter, with 

### f ormer version sim ul

taneo usly repealed. 

### 8. Name/phone of agency contact person: 

### Jeffrey Crawford 

### (207) 287-2437 9. 

### If a major substantive 

### rule under Title 5, 

### c. 375, sub-CIT -A, check one of the following: _Provisional adoption

_ Final adoption (prior to Legislative review )

_ Emergency adoption of major- subs t antive rule 10. Certification Statement: I, David P. Littell hereby cenify that the attached is a true copy of the rule(s) described above and lawfully adopted by The Board 

### of E nviron mental 

### Protection on June 17. 2010.**,.,.--** . 1 further certify that all porti.on80f this rule e ado pted in compliance with the re · ements of the Maine Admini strative P edure Act.

Signature (original signature, personally signed by an Assis tant Attorney General

## EFFECTIVE**OATE ~**  'JUL 

## ! O 

## 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|/s/ LEO F. WELLS, III                                     
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive
Officer November 1, 2004



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|/s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                     
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial
Officer November 1, 2004
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-10,319-16

EX P ARTE HERS HELL F RANK S, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 278414-I IN THE 177T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code o f C ri m i n al Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was co n v i ct ed of ag gravated robber y and sente nced to imprisonment for life

. In his prese nt applicat ion, Applicant raises three grounds. This application, howeve r, prese nts a more serious question. This Court’s rec ords reflect that Applicant h as fi led eight prior applications perta ining to this conviction. It is obvious from the rec ord that Applicant continues to raise issues that have been prese nted and reje cted in previous applications or that should have been2

prese nted in previous applications. The writ of habea s corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S. , 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex p a r t e Carr , 511 S.W .2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Be cause of his repe titive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claim s ar e barred from revie w under Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandone d by his abuse of the writ. This appli ca tion is dismiss ed. There fore , we instruct the Honora ble Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appea ls, not to acc ept or file the ins t an t ap p lication for a writ of habea s corpus, or any future application perta ining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims prese nted have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Bilton , 602 S.W .2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980). Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal Justice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Filed: Jul y

29, 2015 Do not publish
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000055008-MAY-201310:25 AM
Exhibit 12.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:
March 24, 2010
    
    /s/ Yeung Chu Kwong, WilliamName:
    
    Yeung Chu Kwong, WilliamTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
TREY HARRIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1476

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 31, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County.

Timothy A. Register, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders* appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence, but 

remand for the trial court to correct two scrivener’s errors in the order revoking his 

 

* Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
2

probation. Although Appellant was on probation for one count of grand theft, the 

revocation order states that he was on probation for two counts of grand theft. 

Additionally, while the State alleged, and the trial court orally pronounced its 

finding, that Appellant violated Conditions 5 and 6 of his probation by committing 

one new law offense and associating with a person engaged in criminal activity, 

respectively, the revocation order states that he violated his probation “[b]y violating 

Condition 5 by committing new law offenses.” We, therefore, remand for the trial 

court to correct the revocation order. See Williams v. State, 138 So. 3d 1102, 1103 

(Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (affirming a judgment and sentence in an Anders appeal, but 

remanding for the trial court to correct the revocation order to conform to its oral 

pronouncement as to which alleged violations supported revocation); see 

also Nickolas v. State, 66 So. 3d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Washington v. State, 37 

So. 3d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). Appellant need not be present. See Williams, 138 

So. 3d at 1103.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAURICE SMITH,

Petitioner, No. 2:04-cv-02358-MDS

vs. ORDER

T. SCHWARTZ, et al.

Respondent

 /

Petitioner has no pending filing deadlines in this case, nor has he identified any particular

reason he needs access to the law library at this time. Petitioner’s request for law library access

is denied. 

DATED: Feburary 1, 2010

/s/ Milan D. Smith, Jr. 

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE

Sitting by Designation

Case 2:04-cv-02358-MDS Document 12 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 1
DuPont Chemicals & Fluoroproducts Chestnut Run Plaza 702 1276-E 4417 Lancaster Pike Wilmington, DE 19805 USA

Chestnut Run Plaza 702 / 1276

- E , Wilmington, DE 19805 

## DuPont Chemicals & Fluoroproducts

CONTAINS CLEAN AIR ACT CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORM ATION

March 28, 2012

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation Stratospheric Protection Division Attention: Melissa Fiffer 1310 L Street NW, 10 th Floor (Room 1029) Washington, DC 20005

Dear Ms Fiffer:

Reference: DuPont SNAP Information Notice (Z)-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-but-2-ene (CAS RN 692-4 9-9)
[ Report DuPont-17453-785-1 ]

Please see the attached letter and toxicity studies (on the enclosed CD) submitted for PMN P-11- 0549 for the EPA.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Confidential Business Information Center (CBIC) – TS7407M Attention: Audrey Binder EPA East Building, Room 6428 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004-3302

Please contact me if you have any questions about t his submission or need further clarification.
Sincerely,

[ Helen Walter-Terrinoni Global Marketing Manager Telephone: 302-999-2442 Email: helen.a.walter-terrinoni@usa.dupont.com ]

Via Federal Express
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOL GARCIA, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1927 FCD GGH P

vs.

K. PROSPER, et al.

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff

seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On July 18, 2005, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the

February 7, 2005 amended complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendant Pompey was

returned unserved because “unable to locate def.” Plaintiff must provide additional information

to serve this defendant. Plaintiff shall promptly seek such information through discovery, the

California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov't. Code § 6250, et seq., or other means available to

plaintiff. If access to the required information is denied or unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may

seek judicial intervention.

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01927-FCD-GGH Document 18 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff one USM-285 form,

along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed February 7, 2005;

2. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and

submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following

documents:

a. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant; 

b. Two copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed February 7, 2005;

and

c. One completed summons form (if not previously provided) 

or show good cause why he cannot provide such information.

DATED: 12/7/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

garc1927.8e 

Case 2:04-cv-01927-FCD-GGH Document 18 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOL GARCIA, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1927 FCD GGH P

vs.

K. PROSPER, et al.,

 

Defendants. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

 / OF DOCUMENTS

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court’s

order filed :

 One completed summons form

 One completed USM-285 form

 Two copies of the February 7, 2005 

 Amended Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-01927-FCD-GGH Document 18 Filed 12/07/05 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES WHITTENBERG,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2313 FCD JFM P

vs.

LT. L. ROLL,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed two requests for an extension of time to file and serve an

opposition to defendant’s June 26, 2006 motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's July 11, 2006 and July 18, 2006 requests for an extension of time are

granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and

serve an opposition to defendant’s June 26, 2006 motion for summary judgment. Defendant’s

reply, if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter.

DATED: July 24, 2006.

/mp;001; whit2313.36(2)

Case 2:04-cv-02313-FCD-JFM Document 72 Filed 07/26/06 Page 1 of 1
32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V,
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Kimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  
 /s/Kimberly A.
      Springsteen-AbbottKimberly
      A. Springsteen-AbbottChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      14, 2008