UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASH ING TON D
. C

.. 20460

June 24 , 2015 MEMORAND UM OffiCE; QF Ctf£MIC'.l WETY AXO**~llllOH** PR(\'(H rtOH

S UBJECT: FIFRA Scie n tific Advisory Pane l (SAP) Waiver Request for the F i nal Rule : FROM: Rev i s i ons to M i n i mum Risk Exemption (SA N 5183.1) Laura E
. Ba i ley
. Supervisor/Executive Secretary

# ~(A..**fk' £~** **.** F I FRA Scient ifi c Advisory Pa n el (7201M) 

## {)(gA 

# r --v TO : Jack Housenger, D irecto r Office of Pest i c i de Programs (7 50 1 P)
The FIFRA SAP waives scientific rev i ew and comme n t on the final rule ent i tled.
" Rev i s i ons to Min i mum R isk Exemp t ion ." The purpose of t h e final rule i s to: more clearly specify the active and inert ingred i ents pe rm itted in minimum risk pesticide products t h at are exempt f rom federa l reg i strat i on u n der the F ederal I n sectic i de. Fung i c i de. and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA); requ ire t hat manufacturers of these products l i st these ingredients i n a c l ear and specified way on t he p r oduct labels, and i nc l u d e th e manufacturer's company name and contact i nformation on the label
. The proposed 

### revisions a r e ad ministrat ive i n nature an d do not contain scientific issues that require the SAP's co ns iderat io n . Attachment cc : Ryne Ya r ger /FEA D (7506P) Kathy Dav i s/FEAD ( 7506P)Ju n o 

### 5. lOIS UNITED STATES ENV I RONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASH I NGTON. D
. C

. 20460

orne£ Of CH£ \.OC.Al WUY A.'\10 P O t.U.ITlCN P Fi f'o't; KT'XI t i

S UBJECf: R e qu es t f Or W aiver of th e F IFR A**Sci ~.** **"n ic**  , \ dv i so r y Pa n el's (SAP) Review of 

### t h e f in a l R ule : R ev i s ions to M i nimum R isk Exempt ion ( SA N 5 1 83
. 1 )**R0~1:** l..1 u m 

### E. Ba il e y . M.S
.. Execu t ive**Scc~ 1)'**  FI F RA S ci cnt il ic A d vi s ory Pan d TO: St e ph en J. Kl ai n c. P h .D
.. Cho ir FI FRA Sc ient i fic Advisor y Pane l 

### Att ac h e

d i s t h

e tin n.l ru l e enti t l ed

- RC\ ' i s ions to**lini mu** **m** 

### Ri sk Ex e m p

t ion" , T h

e pu rpose of th e lin .n 1 rule is to: m ore cl ea rl y speci fy t h e : 1 c t

i v c o n d inert in g n :d icn ts pc nn ith.-d in min i mum ri s k pes t ic i d e prod u c t$ th:tt : :m: ex em p t from fcdcrn l r cgis t rn t ion unde r th e F cd cm l I n sect i c ide. Fungicide . a n d R ode nticide Act {F IFRA ): re quir e th a t m:mu f:.ct u rers of t hes e p r odu cts li s t th ese 

### in gred i e nt s i n :1. 

### ciC'.ar :m d sp..."Cilied \\ ' 3)' 

### on tlh! 

### prod uct l abe l s . O J1d indud c t h e manu fa ct urer's c om p3.n y n a m

e and c o n me t i nfo m1 :tt i o n o n t he l:t bc l. T hese ch ; m gcs wi ll pro , • ide com p li: m ce de t c m1 in ations b y 

### sta t es. tribes, 

### and t h e E PA
. N o ingr.
.. 

### '<li cnL.r; are b!:i ns 

### :t.dded o r re m o , ·cd 

### fr o m t h e m inimum risk exempt i on in t his rukm aking
. The A gen cy r equ e sts th a t th e f lfR A S ci entil i e A dvisor y P an el ( SA£ ') wa i ve 

### its r eview of t hi s li na l rul e bo.."'Ca u sc t he cla ri li c a t io n a nd res t ruc turin g of t he c um :nt r egulJ t io ns a rc ad m inist r.tti\' C i n n : ll urc 

### and c o nl ai n n o s ci ent ifi c iss u es t ha t w:m ant rt\ • icw b y the SAP. P

le;asc ind ica t e bel ow wh e t he r y ou co n cur with t h i s req u es t. a n d I will n o t i fy th e Age n cy uc c o rd ing ly.**ECO MM** **EN TI** **:** Th e fl f R A Sci ent i fi c A d visory P a n el wa h · cs s ci ent ifi c rt\ • ic w tt n d co mment o n t h e fi na l rul e 

### ent it

led ' 'Revisio n s t o 

### rvtini mu m R i s k Exe mption"
. The fi na l rule dOC$ n o t co nlll in 

### sci e-nt i fi c**ssu ~o.** **'S** 

### th a t warrant revi e w by 

### th e ll, 1n

el. 

### Co n c ur Non

- Concu r ---------------- ( D o r c)