Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Notices 10789 

1While the Show Cause Order also alleged that 

Respondent materially falsified his application, the 

investigative file does not contain any probative 

evidence on this issue. 

whose state controlled substances 

authority has been suspended or 

revoked. See Sheran Arden Yeates, 71 

FR 39130, 39131 (2006); Dominick A. 

Ricci, 58 FR 51104, 51105 (1993); Bobby 

Watts, 53 FR 11919, 11920 (1988). See 

also 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3) (authorizing the 

revocation of a registration ‘‘upon a 

finding that the registrant * * * has had 

his State license or registration 

suspended [or] revoked * * * and is no 

longer authorized by State law to engage 

in the * * * distribution [or] dispensing 

of controlled substances’’). 

As found above, the letters from the 

State Department of Health establish 

that Respondent no longer has authority 

to handle controlled substances in 

Massachusetts, the State in which he 

holds his DEA registration. Therefore, 

Respondent is no longer entitled to 

maintain his DEA registration. 

Furthermore, based on the evidence 

in the investigative file which shows 

that Respondent obtained 37,500 dosage 

units of hydrocodone bitartrate 

notwithstanding that he no longer had 

authority to practice medicine, I 

conclude that Respondent was engaged 

in the diversion of substantial quantities 

of controlled substances. Therefore, 

while this conduct was not alleged as 

grounds for the revocation of 

Respondent’s registration, I conclude 

that the public interest requires that 

Respondent’s registration be revoked 

effective immediately.1 See 21 CFR 

1316.67. 

Order 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 

823(f) and 824(a), as well as 28 CFR 

0.100(b) and 0.104, I hereby order that 

DEA Certificate of Registration, 

BA4361426, issued to Julian A. Abbey, 

M.D., be, and it hereby is, revoked. I 

further order that any pending 

applications for renewal or modification 

of such registration be, and they hereby 

are, denied. This order is effective 

immediately. 

Dated: February 28, 2007. 

Michele M. Leonhart, 

Deputy Administrator. 

[FR Doc. E7–4237 Filed 3–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

[OMB Number 1110–0009] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection, 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 30-day notice of information 

collection under review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection; Analysis 

of Law Enforcement Officers Killed and 

Assaulted. 

The Department of Justice, Federal 

Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice 

Information Services Division will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and clearance in accordance 

with established review procedures of 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. This 

proposed information collection was 

previously published in the Federal 

Register on January 5, 2007, Volume 72, 

Number 3, Pages 582–583, allowing for 

a 60 day comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until April 9, 2007. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to Mr. Gregory E. 

Scarbro, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of 

Investigation, Criminal Justice 

Information Services (CJIS) Division, 

Module E–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, 

Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306; 

facsimile (304) 625–3566. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Comments 

should address one or more of the 

following four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques of 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of this information 

collection: 

(1) Type of information collection: 

Revision of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) The title of the form/collection: 

Analysis of Law Enforcement Officers 

Killed and Assaulted. 

(3) The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

department sponsoring the collection: 

Form 1–701; Criminal Justice 

Information Services Division, Federal 

Bureau of Investigation, Department of 

Justice. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: City, county, State, 

Federal and tribal law enforcement 

agencies. This report will gather specific 

incident data obtained from law 

enforcement agencies in which an 

officer was feloniously or accidentally 

killed in the line of duty; information is 

also collected on this form when any 

officer sustains injury from a firearm or 

knife or other cutting instrument. 

Officer killed data are published 

annually in the publication Law 

Enforcement Officers Killed and 

Assaulted. Serious assault data are 

presented as separate topic papers. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: There are approximately 275 

law enforcement agency respondents; 

calculated estimates indicate 1 hour per 

report. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with this 

collection: There are approximately 275 

hours, annual burden, associated with 

this information collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Ms. Lynn Bryant, Department 

Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning 

Staff, Justice Management Division, 

United States Department of Justice, 

Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 

D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: March 5, 2007. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United 

States Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. E7–4233 Filed 3–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–02–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES