alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---------------------------------------------------------------- Electronically Filed Supreme Court 26517 10-JAN-2011 01:54 PM

NO. 26517
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs. RONALD G.S. AU, Respondent.

In re Application for Reinstatement of RONALD G.S. AU, Petitioner.

(ODC 95-242-4701, ODC 97-213-5407, 98-064-5555)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, J., Circuit Judge Crandall in place of Acoba, J., recused,

Circuit Judge Trader in place of Duffy, J., recused, and Circuit Judge McKenna, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of the “Disciplinary Board’s Report and Recommendation Denying Reinstatement of Ronald G.S. Au to the Practice of Law,” the record, and the briefs of the parties, it appears that Petitioner Au was suspended from the practice of law for 5 years, effective July 22, 2005. It further appears that during the period of suspension, Petitioner Au represented himself and a company, Gourmet Delite, Inc., in arbitrating issues concerning a business lease, a violation of Rule 2.17(a)of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ' i. Petitioner Au was entitled to represent himself in the arbitration, but he could not represent Gourmet Delite, Inc. See Oahu Plumbing v. Kona Construction, Inc. , 60 Haw. 372, 590 P.2d 570 (1979) and ODC v. Gould, 119 Hawai ' i 265, 195 P.3d 1197 (2008). Petitioner Au’s arguments that his representation of Gourmet Delite, Inc. was authorized by HRS chapter 658A are without merit. In light of Petitioner Au’s practice while suspended, we see no need to address in detail the other points raised by him, and merely note we find them without merit. In light of the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Au’s Petition for Reinstatement is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Au may not seek reinstatement before December 31, 2012. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, January 10, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Virginia L. Crandall /s/ Rom A. Trader /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

2
Case 2:04-cv-02695-FCD-GGH   Document 21    Filed 02/22/06   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-24T13:47:02-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

QUIN DENVIR, Bar #49374

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 498-5700

Attorney for Defendant

TIMOTHY CELESTINE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

TIMOTHY CELESTINE,

Defendant.

_______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR. S-05-0019 FCD

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING

STATUS CONFERENCE

Date: May 23, 2005

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States

of America, and defendant, Timothy Celestine, that the status conference

scheduled for May 23, 2005, may be continued to June 27, 2005, at 

9:30 a.m.

Defense counsel and Mr. Celestine have yet to complete their factual

investigation, which they expect to bear heavily on resolution of the

case. So that the investigation may be completed, the parties agree that

the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and that time

under the Speedy Trial Act may be excluded from the date of this Order

Case 2:05-cr-00019-FCD Document 18 Filed 05/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

through June 27, 2005, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and

(B)(iv)(Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

QUIN DENVIR

Federal Defender

Dated: May 19, 2005 /s/ T. Zindel 

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for TIMOTHY CELESTINE

McGREGOR SCOTT

United States Attorney

Dated: May 19, 2005 /s/ M. Grad 

MARY GRAD

Assistant U.S. Attorney

O R D E R

The status conference is continued to June 27, 2005, at 9:30 a.m.

and time under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded through that date for the

reasons set forth above and by agreement of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

HON. FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00019-FCD Document 18 Filed 05/20/05 Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 52007PC0748 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007PC0748

**Proposal for a Council Decision on establishing the European Community position within the Ministerial Council of the Energy Community (Belgrade, 18 December 2007) /* COM/2007/0748 final */ **

*

*

[pic] | COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels, 21.11.2007

COM(2007) 748 final

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

On establishing the European Community position within the Ministerial Council of the Energy Community (Belgrade, 18 December 2007)

(presented by the Commission)

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

The Ministerial Council of the Energy Community will meet on 18 December 2007 in Belgrade. In order for the European Community to take part in the relevant decisions, it is necessary to establish the position of the European Community pursuant Article 300 of the Treaty and in accordance with the provisions of the Council Decision of 29 May 2006 on the conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty.

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

On establishing the European Community position within the Ministerial Council of the Energy Community (Belgrade, 18 December 2007)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 300 paragraph 2, second subparagraph,

Having regard to Council Decision on the Conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty (2006/500/EC – 29 May 2006), and in particular Article 4 and 5 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

In view of the meeting of the Ministerial Council of the Energy Community to take place in Belgrade on 18 December 2007, the position of the Community regarding the issues falling under the scope of Article 300 paragraph 2 second subparagraph of the Treaty is set out in Annex to this decision.

Done at Brussels, [...]

For the Council

The President

[...]

ANNEX European Community position

- The European Community approves, as the EC's share of the overall budget, a budget contribution of maximum 2 500 000 € for 2008 and 2 940 000 € for 2009, subject to the adoption by the Commission of its proposal pursuant article 88 of the Energy Community Treaty.

- The European Community approves that, for the implementation of Directive 2005/89/EC, Directive 2004/97/EC and Regulation (EC) n° 1775/2005 in the Contracting parties, the timeframe for implementation should be of 2 years for the Directives and 1 year for the Regulation.
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of California
      News Tech for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, I certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of California News Tech for the quarter
              ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of California
              News Tech.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                Marian MunzName:
            Marian
                MunzTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer,Date:
            November
                14, 2005By:
            /s/
                Robert JasparName:
            Robert
                JasparTitle:
            Principal
                Financial OfficerDate:
            November
                14, 2005
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of American BioCare Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Gary D. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer and Jack Zwick, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





April 15, 2011





/s/ Gary D. Lewis


________________________


Gary D. Lewis


Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Jack Zwick


________________________


Jack Zwick


Chief Financial Officer
Case No. 13,809.

#### TAYLOR v. WOODS et al.

[3 Woods, 146.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Louisiana.

April Term, 1878.

Appeal — Admikaltt—Costs.

The allowance or non-allowance of costs in an admiralty cause being a matter within the discretion of the court, is not a subject of appeal.

[Appeal from the district court of the United States for the district of Louisiana.

[This was a libei by Jordan Taylor against B. D. Woods and others.) Heard on motion to dismiss the appeal.

R. De Gray, for libelant

Charles S. Rice, for claimant

BRADLEY, Circuit Justice.

As no decree could have been rendered for the libelant by the court below, except for costs; and as the allowance or non-allowance of costs is *815in the discretion of the court, and not a subject of appeal, the appeal must be dismissed, but without costs to either party.
No. 51754.

#### Protests 79742-K, etc., of Quan Hing et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material re'speets to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
No. 59022.

protest 187879-K (San Francisco).

#### Rathjen Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that 15 bottles of cordials were,, in fact, short at the time of unlading of the shipment and following *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 50499.

#### Protest 110679-K of Herbert B. Moller (Tampa).

*270Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the plaintiff failed to establish that the parts valued at $3,970 or at $225 were either previously shipped from the United States or were the product of American manufacture. It was held that the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification had not been overcome and the protest was therefore overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1998             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0                  23,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0                   5,965
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                 204,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 244,637
<PP&E>                                               0                  60,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                  36,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 361,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  79,319
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                   7,126
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 273,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 361,949
<SALES>                                        230,056                 230,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,731                 192,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   187                     187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  49                      49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,300                  38,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,516                  15,516
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,784                  22,784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32                     .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32                     .32
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 21, 2014

t1118 

# Order

Clerk November 21, 2014

148767

MARIAM BAZZI, Personal Represe ntative of

the Estate of Alexandrea Ghadia Allard,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148767

COA: 317249

Wayne CC: 13

- 000127

- NH

INDIRA I. ONWUZURIKE, M.D., NANCY

GOLDMAN CUTLER, M.D., and WILLIAM

BEAUMONT HOSPITAL,

Defendants

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSE D with prejudice and without costs.
* Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 01-40168

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CRUZ PERALTA-SOTO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-00-CR-416-1

August 24, 2001

Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Cruz Peralta-Soto (“Peralta”), has

requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Peralata has not filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our
-2-

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
<page>
											 EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partner-
ship.






By:	/s/Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:		President

Date:		March 8, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT McINTYRE’S FIRST REQUEST FOR EOT TO RESPOND TO

PLAINTIFF'S RFAs

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

ROBERT R. ANDERSON

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

MONICA N. ANDERSON

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

DANIEL P. O’DONNELL, State Bar No. 177872

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 324-5810

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Carey, Traquina, Cervantes,

Cheung and McIntyre

SA2004104569

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 SACRAMENTO DIVISION

RONALD DWANE BROOK,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOM L. CAREY, WARDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CIV-S-04-1254 EJG GGJ P

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT McINTYRE’S FIRST

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS AND

VERIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS

Defendants’ first request for an extension of time to file their response to 

Plaintiff’s complaint was considered by this Court, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ responsive pleading is due May 30, 2005.

DATED: 5/9/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

broo1254.eot04

broo1254.eot04.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-01254-GGH Document 43 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 38866.

#### Protests 315903-G, etc., of Amberg Schwab & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain of the items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit (13) a.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ENACTED BY



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Komatsu, Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Masahiro Sakane, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s) 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 31, 2004



By:

/s/ Masahiro SakaneMasahiro SakanePresident, Chief Executive Officer




27
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Witness Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my
knowledge and belief that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|Dated: March 12, 2004 |  |     |                                                                                  
|--------------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | BY: | /s/DAVID B. GOULDDavid B. Gould Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Witness Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Witness Systems, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks