alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20081 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICHARD OSA IYAMU, also known as Richard O. Iyamu, also known as Kofi Ada Nathan, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-452-3

-------------------- December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Richard Osa Iyamu on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Iyamu has responded to counsel’s motion, contending that he did not waive his right to appeal whether his sentence should have been imposed to run consecutively to his state sentence; that the Government breached the plea agreement; and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the guilty plea and on appeal. Our independent review of the brief, Iyamu’s response, and the recordNo. 01-20081 -2- discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 7, 2015

Order 

July 7, 2015

149872-3(67)

150042

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 149872

v COA: 317158

Wayne CC: 13-001620-AR

SEAN HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 149873

v COA: 317272

Wayne CC: 13-001620-AR

WILLIAM LITTLE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 150042

v COA: 316072

Wayne CC: 13-001041-FH

NEVIN HUGHES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time 

for filing its brief on appeal is GRANTED. The brief submitted on June 25, 2015, is 

accepted for filing.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the  purposes of  complying  with  Section 1,  U.S.C.,  1950,  I, the
undersigned  Chief Financial  Officer of M.B.A.  Holdings,  Inc. (the "Company")
hereby  certify,  based on my knowledge,  that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the  Company for the fiscal year ended  October  31, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company.

Dated   January 29,  2004


                                           By      /s/ Dennis M. O'Connor
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                   Dennis M. O'Connor
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

                                       34
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Prime Energy
Corporation Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,722
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                        98
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,918
<PP&E>                                          29,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,377
<BONDS>                                          8,109<F1>
<COMMON>                                           760
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,307<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,684
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,059
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    596
<INCOME-TAX>                                        69
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                527
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>  
                             F/S summer     Source
CURRENT PORTION LT DEBT         202           CFS
<F2>     
                             F/S summer     Source
ACCUM. DEFICIT                  992           CFS
TREASURY STOCK                3,589           CFS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

May 20, 1948

No. 52336.

protests 965481-G, etc. (Portland, Oreg.).

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of imitation gut similar in all material respects to that the classification of which was involved in *Bush*v. *United States*(34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 47915.

#### Protests 560870-G, etc., of Bolivian Panama Hat Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) certain of the harvest hats in question were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those imported or withdrawn from warehouse subsequent to the Netherlands Trade Agreement were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under paragraph 1504 and said T. D. 48075, as claimed.
Case No. 6,774.

#### HOWE v. SHUMAWAY.

[Cited in Coy v. Perkins, 13 Fed. 112. No where reported; opinion not now accessible.)
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

January 22, 2013 

ERRATA

______________________ 

Appeal No. 2012-1094

HARRIS CORPORATION

v.

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, 

Decided: January 17, 2013

Nonprecedential Opinion

______________________ 

Please make the following change:

Page 24, line 17, change “noninfrignement” to 

--noninfringement--.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30235]

[[Page 77590]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8983]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Latin America in Construction: Architecture 1955-
1980''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Latin America in Construction: 
Architecture 1955-1980,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, from 
on or about March 29, 2015, until on or about July 19, 2015, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 18, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-30235 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Richard Vincent Letizia

Appellate case number: 01-16-00808-CR

Trial court case number: 2112524

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 10 of Harris County

Appellant, Richard Vincent Letizia, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s 

order, in cause no. 2112524, denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus.

On May 29, 2018, appellant filed a “Motion to Extend Time to Amend 

Appellant’s Brief.” On May 31, 2018, this Court granted appellant’s “Motion for 

Extension of Time to File an Amended Brief Pro Se” and extended the time to file an 

amended brief to July 23, 2018. Appellant’s “Motion to Extend Time to Amend 

Appellant’s Brief,” filed on May 29, 2018, is dismissed as moot.

Appellant has filed multiple motions requesting that we order the trial court clerk 

and court reporter to file, in this appeal, a clerk’s record and reporter’s record of 

proceedings in trial court case no. 2100551:

 “Motion to Order Court Reporter to Transcribe Any and All Proceedings 

for Trial Court Cause No: 2100551,” filed May 29, 2018;

 “For Court Record,” filed May 25, 2018;

 “Motion for Clerk’s Record for Trial Court Cause Number 2100551,” filed

May 24, 2018;

 “For Appellant Appeal Record. May 16, 2018,” filed May 21, 2018;

 “For the Appellant Record,” filed on May 17, 2018; and

 “Motion to Order Court Reporter to Transcribe March 2, 2018 Trial Cause 

Number 2100551,” filed on May 10, 2018.
The motions are denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 28, 2018
#### American Tap Dance Orchestra, Inc., Appellant, v State Insurance Fund, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 959]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered September 19, 1994, which, in this proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging the determination of respondent State Insurance Fund to assess a Workers’ Compensation premium in connection with certain performers and technicians, denied the petition and dismissed the matter, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record reveals no basis to interfere with the respondent State Insurance Fund’s determination as to the amount of premiums. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                     Mathematical and Physical Sciences Advisory Committee (66).                 

*Date/Time:*                     April 6, 2007; 9 a.m.-12 p.m.                 

*Place:*                     Teleconference, National Science Foundation, Room 1235, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                 

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                 

*Contact Person:*                     Dr. Morris L. Aizenman, Senior Science Associate, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Science Foundation,  Room 1005, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230; (703) 292-8807.                 

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice and recommendations concerning NSF science and education activities within the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences.                 

*Agenda:*                     Budget and Planning, Report of the Committee of Visitors for the Division of Chemistry,  Report of the Committee of Visitors for the Division of Mathematical Sciences.                 

*Summary Minutes:*                     May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                 

Dated: March 6, 2007. 

Susanne E. Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E7-4227 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
(November 13, 1995)

#### Ahmed Alkifi et al., Appellants, v Arverne Associates et al., Respondents.

[634 NYS2d 391]

—Appeal by the plaintiffs from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), dated May 11, 1994.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Smith at the Supreme Court. Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
No. 55987.

protests 152452-K, etc. (New York).

#### Artgift Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10642-10643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1504]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 49; Newark, New Jersey

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 49, submitted an application to the Board for 
authority to expand FTZ 49 in the Newark area to include additional 
sites at the I-Port 12 industrial park (Site 7) in Carteret, the I-Port 
440 industrial park (Site 8) in Perth Amboy, the Port Reading Business 
Park (Site 9) in Woodbridge, and, the Port Elizabeth Business Park 
(Site 10) in Elizabeth, within the Newark/New York Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 23-2006; filed 6/14/06);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (71 FR 35611, 6/21/06), and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 49 is approved, subject to the FTZ 
Act and

[[Page 10643]]

the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and further subject 
to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall 
zone project and a sunset provision for Sites 7 through 10 that would 
terminate authority for the sites on March 31, 2014, for any of the 
sites that have not been activated under FTZ procedures before that 
date.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 28th day of February 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4287 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit 31(a)**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Martin S. Lapera, certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Frederick County Bancorp,Inc.;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)            Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)            Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)            All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
| Date: July 25, 2006 | /s/ Martin S.  Lapera                 |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                | Martin S. Lapera                      |
|                | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIONELL THOLMER,

Petitioner,

v.

C.M. HARRISON,

Respondent.

CIV S 04-2491 FCD PAN P

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Respondent’s application for a 30-day enlargement of

time in which to file a response in this matter is hereby GRANTED. Respondent’s response is

due on May 8, 2006.

Dated: April 7, 2006.

thol2491.ext

Case 2:04-cv-02491-FCD-EFB Document 44 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 38882.

#### Protest 826833-G/10691 of Uddo Taormina Corporation (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that 24 large tins of peeled tomatoes were short shipped. The protest was accordingly sustained.
# C_2007231EN.01000301.xml

| 3.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/3

---

Amendments to the Explanatory Note to Article 17 of the pan-Euro-Mediterranean protocols on rules of origin

(2007/C 231/04)

The Note to Article 17 — ‘Certification of origin for the purpose of pan-Euro-Mediterranean cumulation’, the paragraph ‘Mandatory use of the movement certificate EUR-MED’, shall be completed with the following example:

| 3. | Example of cumulation applied in one of the countries referred to Articles 3(1) and 4(1) when an originating product is exported to one of the Mediterranean countries. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Example of cumulation applied in one of the countries referred to Articles 3(1) and 4(1) when an originating product is exported to one of the Mediterranean countries.

Swiss white chocolate in bulk (HS 1704) is imported into the Community where the chocolate bars are formed and packed for sale. The Community originating status of chocolate (HS 1704) is obtained on the basis of cumulation with Switzerland therefore when the chocolate is exported to Tunisia, the Community customs administration must issue a movement certificate EUR-MED containing a statement ‘Cumulation applied with Switzerland’.

---
No. 45000.

#### Protest 902481-G of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of pipe kazoos in chief value of metal. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 397 was therefore sustained on the authority of Abstract 44122.
No. 58050.

protests 182852-K, etc. (New York).

#### Balfour Guthrie & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is composed of rush and is not of grass nor of rice straw; that merchandise of like character is now being assessed at 20 percent under said paragraph 1021, as modified, *supra;*and that the termination of the said General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade with respect to concessions therein initially negotiated with China (T. D. 52587), insofar as said paragraph 1021 is concerned, related only to floor coverings of grass or of rice straw. Upon the agreed statement of facts, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.