29–010 

Calendar No. 45 

113TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! SENATE 1st Session 113–14 

SLEEPING BEAR DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE 

CONSERVATION AND RECREATION ACT 

APRIL 22, 2013.—Ordered to be printed 

Mr. WYDEN, from the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources, submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany S. 23] 

The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, to which was 

referred the bill (S. 23) to designate as wilderness certain land and 

inland water within the Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore 

in the State of Michigan, and for other purposes, having considered 

the same, reports favorably thereon without amendment and recommends that the bill do pass. 

PURPOSE

The purpose of S. 23 is to designate approximately 32,557 acres 

of land and inland water within Sleeping Bear Dunes National 

Lakeshore in Michigan as wilderness. 

BACKGROUND AND NEED

Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore was established in 

1970 and includes over 70,000 acres of forests, lakes, beaches, and 

large sand dunes along the shores of Lake Michigan in northwestern Michigan. The lakeshore extends nearly 30 miles along the 

eastern shore of Lake Michigan, and includes two large Lake 

Michigan islands with an additional 35 miles of shoreline. The park 

protects and preserves scenic and recreational resources, including 

perched sand dunes, miles of beaches, inland lakes and streams, 

wetlands, and an upland, beech-maple, northern hardwood forest. 

In 1981, the park’s general management plan recommended over 

30,000 acres of the park as wilderness, and those lands have been 

managed as wilderness since that time. Following completion of the 

park’s general management plan, the National Park Service preVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:32 Apr 24, 2013 Jkt 029010 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR014.XXX SR014

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
2 

pared a formal wilderness study. The alternative mapped 32,557 

acres for designation and that is the same as the proposed wilderness designation in S. 23. 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY

S. 23 was introduced by Senators Levin and Stabenow on January 22, 2013. At its business meeting on March 14, 2013, the Committee ordered S. 23 favorably reported. 

During the 112th Congress, the Committee considered similar 

legislation, S. 140, also sponsored by Senators Levin and Stabenow. 

The Subcommittee on National Parks held a hearing on S. 140 on 

May 11, 2011 (S. Hrg. 112–124). At its business meeting on November 10, 2011, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources ordered S. 140 favorably reported (S. Rpt. 112–104). The Senate 

passed S. 140 on December 30, 2012 by unanimous consent. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, in open business session on March 14, 2013, by voice vote of a quorum present, 

recommends that the Senate pass S. 23. 

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS

Section 1 provides the short title, the ‘‘Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore Conservation and Recreation Act.’’ 

Section 2 defines key terms used in the bill. 

Section 3(a) designates approximately 32,557 acres of land and 

inland water within Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, to 

be known as ‘‘Sleeping Bear Dunes Wilderness,’’ as a component of 

the National Wilderness Preservation System. 

Subsection (b) directs that the map describing the wilderness 

area be available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of 

the National Park Service and allows the Secretary of the Interior 

to correct any clerical or typographical errors in the map. The Secretary is directed to provide a corrected map and legal description 

of the wilderness area to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources 

of the House of Representatives as soon as practicable after date 

of enactment. 

Subsection (c) establishes road setbacks of 100 feet from centerline and 300 feet from centerline for adjacent county roads and 

State highways, respectively. 

Section 4(a) directs the Secretary to manage the designated wilderness area in accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 

1131 et seq.), except the date of enactment is considered the date 

of enactment of this Act and reference to the Secretary of Agriculture is considered to reference instead the Secretary of the Interior. 

Subsection (b) provides for continued maintenance of roads outside of the wilderness boundary. 

Subsection (c) clarifies that nothing in this Act affects the jurisdiction of the State of Michigan as with respect to management of 

hunting and fishing within the lakeshore in accordance with section 5 of Public Law 91–479 (16 U.S.C. 460x–4). 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
3 

Subsection (d) contains saving provisions clarifying that nothing 

in this Act alter, modify, or affect any treaty rights or valid private 

property rights in existence on the date of enactment of this Act. 

COST AND BUDGETARY CONSIDERATIONS

The following estimate of costs of this measure has been provided 

by the Congressional Budget Office: 

S. 23—Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore Conservation and 

Recreation Act 

S. 23 would designate as wilderness about 32,500 acres of the 

Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore in the state of Michigan. 

The newly designated lands and inland waterways would comprise 

the Sleeping Bear Dunes Wilderness, a new component of the National Wilderness Preservation System. 

Based on information from the National Park Service, CBO estimates that the bill would have no significant impact on the federal 

budget. More than 30,000 of the affected acres have been managed 

as wilderness since 1981, and CBO estimates that the potential impact of the designation on public use would be minor. Enacting S. 

23 would not affect direct spending or revenues; therefore, pay-asyou-go procedures do not apply. 

S. 23 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates 

as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments. 

The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Martin von Gnechten. 

The estimate was approved by Theresa Gullo, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis. 

REGULATORY IMPACT EVALUATION

In compliance with paragraph 11(b) of rule XXVI of the Standing 

Rules of the Senate, the Committee makes the following evaluation 

of the regulatory impact which would be incurred in carrying out 

S. 23. 

The bill is not a regulatory measure in the sense of imposing 

Government-established standards or significant economic responsibilities on private individuals and businesses. 

No personal information would be collected in administering the 

program. Therefore, there would be no impact on personal privacy. 

Little, if any, additional paperwork would result from the enactment of S. 23, as ordered reported. 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING

S. 23, as ordered reported, does not contain any congressionally 

directed spending items, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined in rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate. 

EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS

Executive Communications were not requested by the Senate 

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources in the 113th Congress. The following Administration testimony references similar 

legislation introduced in the 112th Congress. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
4 

The testimony provided by the National Park Service at the May 

11, 2011, Subcommittee on National Parks hearing on S. 140 follows. 

STATEMENT OF STEPHEN E. WHITESELL, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, PARK PLANNING, FACILITIES AND LANDS, NATIONAL

PARK SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, thank 

you for the opportunity to appear before you today to 

present the Department of the Interior’s views on S. 140, 

a bill to designate the Sleeping Bear Dunes Wilderness at 

Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore in the State of 

Michigan. 

The Department strongly supports enactment of S. 140. 

This legislation would designate 32,557 acres, or 46 percent, of Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore in Michigan’s Lower Peninsula as federally protected wilderness. 

Management of the wilderness area would be in accordance with the 1964 Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et 

seq.). 

P.L. 91–479 established Sleeping Bear Dunes National 

Lakeshore on October 21, 1970, in order ‘‘. . . that certain 

outstanding natural features including forests, beaches, 

dune formations, and ancient (glacial) phenomena . . . be 

preserved in their natural setting and protected from developments and uses which would destroy the scenic beauty and natural character of the area . . . for the benefit, 

inspiration, education, recreation, and enjoyment of the 

public.’’ This bill clearly supports the intent of that law. 

The park extends nearly 30 miles along the eastern 

shore of Lake Michigan. It also includes two large Lake 

Michigan islands with an additional 35 miles of shoreline. 

The park protects and preserves superlative scenic and 

recreational resources including towering perched sand 

dunes that rise as high as 450 feet above Lake Michigan. 

The park contains several federally threatened and endangered species, including the Piping Plover, Pitcher’s Thistle 

and Michigan Monkeyflower. The park also includes many 

historic features, including a lighthouse and three U.S. 

life-saving service stations, coastal villages, and picturesque farmsteads. Permanent wilderness designation will 

ensure protection of these significant natural, cultural and 

historical resources. 

The park receives nearly 1.2 million visitors each year 

who enjoy the beaches, over 100 miles of backcountry 

trails and eight campgrounds. The region surrounding the 

park is a popular vacation and summer home destination 

as visitors and residents take advantage of a variety of 

recreational opportunities, including hiking, camping, 

backpacking, hunting, fishing, bird watching, boating, 

cross-country skiing and snowshoeing. The National Park 

Service estimates that the presence of the Ational Lakeshore brings nearly $78 million of economic benefit to the 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
5 

* Stynes, Daniel J. ‘‘National Park Visitor Spending and Payroll Impacts: 2009.’’ National 

Park Service, 2011. 

local community each year.* Designation of the wilderness 

area will not limit public access or change the way the 

area is currently being managed for public use and enjoyment. 

Native American use of the area extends some 3,000 

years into the past and is represented today primarily by 

the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians. Nothing in S. 140 would modify, alter, or affect any 

treaty rights. 

The park encompasses a total of 71,291 acres; about 

58,571 acres of land and 12,720 acres of water. Over 

30,000 acres of the proposed 32,557-acre wilderness area 

have been managed as wilderness since 1981, when a wilderness proposal produced under the park’s first comprehensive General Management Plan (GMP) was published. Since that time, the five areas of the park proposed 

as wilderness have provided outstanding recreational opportunities for hikers, backpackers, anglers, paddlers, and 

hunters with hunting being allowed in accordance with 

State regulations. A network of hiking trails and numerous camping opportunities will continue to be maintained 

in this portion of the park, even with the wilderness designation. The additional acres in the current proposal arise 

from the inclusion of the Sleeping Bear Plateau, an area 

only suitable for foot travel that continues to offer outstanding opportunities for solitude. Since formal wilderness designation would not change the way in which visitor use is currently managed in the area proposed as wilderness, there is no reason to believe it would have any 

detrimental impact on visitation or the local economy, and 

formal designation may actually have a beneficial impact. 

The proposed wilderness area does not include any existing county roads or areas managed primarily for historic 

resources. This is to ensure the continued availability of 

the county roads for visitors accessing remote trailheads, 

beaches, backcountry areas and historic areas. Although 

the park’s boundary extends one-quarter mile out into 

Lake Michigan, none of the waters of Lake Michigan are 

proposed as wilderness. S. 140 would authorize the use of 

boat motors on the surface water of Lake Michigan adjacent to the wilderness and beaching of those boats, subject 

to applicable laws. This is to ensure continued access by 

boaters to the shoreline beach adjacent to the wilderness 

area. These have been areas of significant public concern. 

Between 2006 and 2009, the NPS developed an updated 

GMP for the park. Because of public concern over the 1981 

wilderness proposal, and its inclusion of county roads and 

historic sites, a formal Wilderness Study was conducted as 

part of this comprehensive planning effort. After extensive 

public involvement, review, and comment, including overwhelming public support for wilderness designation, the 

preferred alternative in the final GMP/Wilderness Study 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
6 

was approved by the Midwest Regional Director on January 6, 2009. The area of proposed wilderness was mapped 

at 32,557 acres, with a portion in all five eligible areas, 

and is the same as the proposed wilderness designation in 

S. 140. The final GMP/Wilderness Study does not propose 

wilderness in several eligible areas, including those areas 

fragmented by the road corridors near the Otter Creek 

area of the Lakeshore; the land within the Port Oneida 

Rural Historic District; the lands in the historic ‘‘Cottage 

Row’’ on North Manitou Island; the area in the South 

Manitou Island historic farm loop; an area near the historic Bufka Farm identified for a bicycle trail; and the congested area at the top of the Dune Climb. 

Passage of S. 140 would support the vision in the new 

GMP. The bill has very strong, broad-based public support. 

The overwhelming majority of local officials, the conservation community, and the Michigan delegation are united in 

their support for this bill as a winning resolution to an 

issue that has been debated since the park’s establishment 

in 1970. Parties that had been bitterly polarized over earlier proposals have reached consensus that this bill strikes 

an appropriate balance between preserving access and 

guaranteeing outstanding primitive recreational opportunities. 

Mr. Chairman, thank you for the opportunity to comment. This concludes my prepared remarks and I will be 

happy to answer any questions you or other committee 

members might have. 

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW

In compliance with paragraph 12 of rule XXVI of the Standing 

Rules of the Senate, the Committee notes that no changes in existing law are made by the bill S. 23 as ordered reported. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING