alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Nuclear Regulatory Commission
 Pursuant to 10 CFR 110.70(C) “Public notice of receipt of an application,” please take notice that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received the following request to amend an export license. Copies of the request are available electronically through ADAMS and can be accessed through the Public Electronic Reading Room (PERR) link 
                    *http://www.nrc.gov/​reading-rm/​adams.html*
                     at the NRC Homepage. A request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene may be filed within 30 days after publication of this notice in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Any request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene shall be served by the requestor or petitioner upon the applicant, the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; and the Executive Secretary, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520. The information concerning this amendment request follows. NRC Export License Application
Description of material
Material type
Total quantity
End use
Recipient countryName of Applicant:  AREVA NP Inc. 
                             Date of Application: December 1, 2006  
                             Date Received: December 5, 2006  
                             Application No.: XW007/02 Docket No.: 11005292
Class A radioactive waste in the form of contaminated metals
License to be amended to extend expiration date to 12/31/2010 and change licensee name Total quantity of contaminants authorized for export remains 3.0 kilograms of uranium-235 (5.0 w/o maximum) contained in 60 kilograms uranium
Metals to be decontaminated and uranium to be disposed of at AECL Chalk River Ontario
CanadaLicenses originally issued to Framatome ANP, Inc.)
 Dated this 7th day of March 2007 at Rockville, Maryland. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Margaret M. Doane, Deputy Director, Office of International Programs.


[FR Doc. E7-4870 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
San Luis Obispo County APCD 209-1 11/5/91

RULE 209. PROVISION FOR SAMPLING AND TESTING FACILITIES 

 (Adopted 8/2/76; Revised 11/5/91) 

The Air Pollution Control Officer may require a person operating or using any article, machine, 

equipment or other contrivance, the use of which may cause the issuance of air contaminants or 

the use of which may eliminate, reduce or control the issuance of air contaminants to provide and 

maintain such facilities as are necessary for sampling and testing. In the event of such 

requirements the Air Pollution Control Officer shall notify the person in writing of the required 

size, number and location of sampling ports; the size and location of sampling platform; the 

access to the sampling platform; and the utilities for operating the sampling and testing 

equipment. The platform and access shall be constructed in accordance with the General 

Industry Safety Orders of the State of California.
Exhibit 32



Certification Of Periodic Financial Report



(Section 906 Certification)



Thomas E. Vessey and Beth Sanders hereby certify as follows:



1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of 1st Centennial Bancorp.



2. The Form 10-KSB of 1st Centennial Bancorp for the Year ended December 31, 2004 complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of 1st Centennial Bancorp.



|                     |  |  |  |                                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas E. Vessey                     
|                     |  |  |  | Thomas E. Vessey, Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 23, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Beth Sanders                         
|                     |  |  |  | Beth Sanders, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT  99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2002 of MNS Eagle Equity Group III, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Annual Report"), I Stephen M. Siedow, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
Company.


Date: March 14, 2003                 /s/ Stephen M. Siedow
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                         Stephen M. Siedow, Chief Executive
                                         Officer, President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-KSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James Dyas, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Alfred Fernandez
--------------------
Alfred Fernandez
Chief Financial Officer

April 11, 2008
# C_2007288EN.01003401.xml

| 30.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/34

---

Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Community of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel originating, inter alia, in Ukraine; change of the names of two companies which are subject to an individual anti-dumping duty for co-operating companies

inter alia

(2007/C 288/10)

Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel originating, inter alia, in the Ukraine are subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 954/2006 (1).

inter alia

1

CJSC Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube and OJSC Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant, companies located in Ukraine, whose exports to the Community of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel are subject to an individual anti-dumping duty of 25,1 % by the above-mentioned Regulation, have informed the Commission that their company names changed on 1 and 14 February 2007 respectively to CJSC Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube and OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant. These company name changes were recorded by the State Tax Administration of Ukraine.

The companies argued that their changes of name do not affect their right to benefit from the individual anti-dumping duty applied to them under their previous names of CJSC Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube and OJSC Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant.

The Commission has examined the information provided and has concluded that this change of names in no way affects the findings of Regulation (EC) No 954/2006. Therefore, the references to CJSC Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube and OJSC Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant should be read as CJSC Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube and OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 954/2006.

The Taric additional code A743 previously attributed to CJSC Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube and OJSC Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant shall apply to CJSC Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube and OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant.

---

(1)  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 4.

1

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

February 28, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00875

- CR

Justin Henry SOWERS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Tex as

Trial Court No. 2018CR7493 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

T he reporter’s r ecord was due to be filed with this court on February 14 , 2020

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. After the due date, court reporter Geneva Garcia filed a notification of late
record

. Sh e request ed a thirty

- five

- day extension of time to file the record.

The reporter’s request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record is GRANTED

IN PART. See id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in a regular appeal to thirty days). The reporter’s record is due on March 16, 2020

. See id.

If the reporter’s record is not filed with this court by March 16 , 2020 , any further requests for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status report. The
report m ust describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond the extended date. A preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is
attached.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justic eIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of February, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         The  undersigned,  a member of the Board of Directors and/or as Officer
of CE  GENERATION,  LLC, a corporation  registered in the State of Delaware (the
"Company"),  hereby  constitutes  and appoints Steven A. McArthur and Douglas L.
Anderson  and each of them,  as  his/her  true and lawful  attorney-in-fact  and
agent,  with full power of substitution and  resubstitution,  for and in his/her
stead, in any and all  capacities,  to sign on his/her behalf the Company's Form
10-K Annual  Report for the fiscal year ending  December 31, 1999 and to execute
any amendments thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto,  and all
other documents in connection  therewith,  with the United States Securities and
Exchange  Commission and  applicable  stock  exchanges,  with the full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing  necessary or advisable
to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person,  hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his/her substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated as of March 30, 2000

/s/ Robert S. Silberman                              /s/ Joseph M. Lillo
Robert S. Silberman                                  Joseph M. Lillo

/s/ Patrick J. Goodman                               /s/ Larry Kellerman
Patrick J. Goodman                                   Larry Kellerman

/s/ Richard P. Johnston                              /s/ Steven M. Pike
Richard P. Johnston                                  Steven M. Pike

/s/ John L. Harrison
John L. Harrison
No. 47921.

#### Protests 50792-K (A), etc., of Ernst Bremermann & Co. et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the inerchandise consists of peat moss of the same character as that passed upon in *Peat Import Corp.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 181, C. D. 319). Claim for free entry under paragraph 1685 was therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MERIDIAN PROJECT SYSTEMS, INC., NO. CIV.S-04-2728 FCD DAD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

HARDIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,

LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

This matter came before the court on February 3, 2006, for

hearing on defendant Computer Methods International Corporation’s

(CMIC) motion to compel production of documents from plaintiff

Meridian Project Systems, Inc. (Meridian). Scott W. Pink appeared on

behalf of plaintiff. Michael E. Chase appeared on behalf of CMIC.

Having considered all written materials submitted in

connection with the motion, and after hearing oral argument, for the

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02728-FCD-DAD Document 114 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

reasons set forth on the record during the hearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that defendant’s motion to compel is DENIED.

DATED: February 6, 2006.

DAD:th

Ddad1\orders.civil\meridian2728.020305

Case 2:04-cv-02728-FCD-DAD Document 114 Filed 02/06/06 Page 2 of 2
SCALE 1:24,000

WACHUSETT MOUNTAIN QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-I

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Wachusett Mountain Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by Janet R. Stone

2013

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1972.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Massachusetts

Geological Survey.

Geology mapped by B.D. Stone in 1982 (unpublished).

Bedrock outcrop areas are from Tucker (1977).

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 12 of 24)

(B

A

R

R

E)

(S

TE

RLIN

G)

(PAXTON)

(GARDNER)

71°52'30"W

71°52'30"W

72°0'0"W

72°0'0"W

42°30'0"N

42°30'0"N

42°22'30"N

42°22'30"N

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

AND OFFICE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (MassGIS),

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION

Stone, J.R., compiler, 2013, Surficial geologic map

of the Mount Grace-Ashburnham-Monson-Webster

24-quadrangle area in central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-I

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/I.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40033

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

CHARLES E. GRAY,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

A. SMITH, L. Woods, UNKNOWN

NAMES PRISON OFFICIALS

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. CA-C-94-172

- - - - - - - - - -

June 29, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), Charles E. Gray was not entitled

to conduct discovery prior to dismissal of his complaint. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(d). Gray failed to establish that any defendant

was deliberately indifferent to Gray's serious medical need or

safety. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976); Farmer

v. Brennan, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1979 (1994). Therefore, the

district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the

complaint.
No. 9

-2-

AFFIRMED.
No. 38873.

#### Protests 820816-G, etc., of Saks & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 8550)

#### Tim Era, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 774176.

(Decided February 21, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney Genei’al, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised unit values less three per centum packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher domestic value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and *537that such values were the appraised unit values, less 3 per centum, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 13.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of i-CABLE Communications Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to such officer's knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date:      June 30, 2004                 By:     /s/ Stephen T.H. Ng
                                              --------------------------
                                              Name:    Stephen T.H. Ng
                                              Title:   Chief Executive Officer




                                         By:     /s/ Samuel S.F. Wong
                                              --------------------------
                                              Name:    Samuel S. F. Wong
                                              Title:   Chief Financial Officer






The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4548]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 07-809; MB Docket No. 05-229; RM-10780]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Madisonville and Rosebud, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; denial of petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document denies a petition for reconsideration filed by 
Gerald Proctor (``Proctor'') directed to the Report and Order in this 
proceeding. In denying the petition for reconsideration, the Media 
Bureau affirms the dismissal of Proctor's untimely expression of 
interest because it would prejudice a conflicting application.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen McLean, Media Bureau, (202) 418-
2738.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MB Docket No. 05-229, adopted February 
21, 2007, and released February 23, 2007. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
regular business hours at the FCC's Reference Information Center, 
Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 
20554. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from 
the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-
800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com.
    This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. The 
Commission is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this 
Memorandum Opinion and Order to the Government Accountability Office 
pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) 
because the aforementioned petition for reconsideration was denied.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. E7-4548 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P