alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES 
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a)
AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MedAssets, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
   /s/ John A. BardisJohn A. BardisChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.01

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-60430,
333-38696, 333-76804 and 333-92232) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87858, 333-111306 and
333-113353) of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2005 relating to the financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 16, 2005

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.24.2

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

SECOND AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

BRUCE GOLDSMITH

ThisSECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT(this "Second
Amendment") is entered into effective as of March 2, 2011, by and betweenALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.(the
"Company") andBRUCE GOLDSMITH("Employee")
(collectively, the "Parties").

RECITALS:

WHEREAS, the Parties entered into an Employment Agreement on April 29, 2009 (the
"Employment Agreement");

WHEREAS, modifications are needed to bring the Employment Agreement into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, mutual covenants, the above recitals, and the agreements herein set forth, and for other
good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Employee hereby agree as follows:







1

---





[Signature Page Follows]

2

---



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have each duly executed thisSECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENTeffective as of the date and year first written above.

ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.By:

/s/ Paul L. BernsName:

Paul L. BernsTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerEMPLOYEE:/s/ Bruce Goldsmith BRUCE GOLDSMITH


Signature Page to Second Amendment to
Employment Agreement

3

---



QuickLinks
(Reap. Dec. 8681)

Entry Nos. 725348; 740051; 768617.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided October 10, 1956)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the items marked “A” and initialed VCS by Examiner Y. C. Schug on the invoices covered by the above-named reappraisement appeals consist of printed linen fabric exported from England.

> That when said above-mentioned items marked “A” and initialed by the Examiner were exported from England such and similar merchandise was not being freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of England, nor was it being freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of England for exportation to the United States, nor was it being freely offered for sale in the principal market of the United States to United States purchasers.

> That the “cost of production” as defined in Section 402 (f), Tariff Act of 1930, for the above-mentioned items marked *“A”*and initialed by the Examiner was as follows:

> *538For cost of materials, labor, and fabrication (Section 402 (f) (1) Tariff Act of 1930):

> 

> To the above prices there should be added 10% for usual general expenses (Section 402 (f) (2)); and then plus 5% and then plus 25% for profits (Section 402 (f) (4)). Said prices are net packed.

> That the above named reppraisement appeals are submitted for decision upon the agreed facts set forth in this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise identified by the items marked *“A”*and initialed YCS by Examiner Y. C. Schug on the invoices, and that such values were as follows:

> 

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise, they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 61399.

protest 299303-K (New York).

#### Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 24, 2014

No. 04-14-00502-CV

IN RE STALLION OILFIELD SERVICES, LTD.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On July 21, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the 

opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further 

consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may 

file a response to the petition in this court no later than August 7, 2014. Any such response 

must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on July 24th, 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 13-11-52737-CV, styled Jose Perez v. Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd. and 

Stallion Oilfield Services in its Common or Assumed Name, pending in the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells 

County, Texas, the Honorable Richard C. Terrell presiding.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Officeof Research on Women�s Health (ORWH) research summaries.**
 
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3070/2:
Item Number:0507-A-68 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000900954
 
September 7, 2018
# C_2007195EN.01001601.xml

| 23.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/16

---

Publication, pursuant to Article 12(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, concerning a cancellation application

(2007/C 195/09)

This publication confers the right to object the cancellation application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 (1). Statements of objections must reach the Commission within six months from the date of this publication.

1

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006

Cancellation request according to Article 12(2)

‘ÜBERKINGER MINERALQUELLEN’

EC No: DE/PDO/017/1057/28.1.2004

ImagePGI ImagePDO

1.   Registered name proposed for cancellation:

‘Überkinger Mineralquellen’

2.   Member State or Third Country:

Germany

3.   Type of product:

Class 2.2: Natural mineral waters and spring waters

4.   Person or body making request for cancellation:

| Name: | Mineralbrunnen Überkingen — Teinach AG |
| --- | --- |
| Address: | Bahnhofstraße 15 |
| D-73337 Überkingen |

Name:

Mineralbrunnen Überkingen — Teinach AG

Address:

Bahnhofstraße 15

D-73337 Überkingen

Nature of legitimate interest in making the request:

The applicant is the only producer of the protected name.

5.   Reasons for Cancellation:

The applicant has decided that it no longer wants to use the name as a protected designation of origin and therefore no longer wants to pay the control costs.

---

(1)  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 9513)

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., a/c Reliance Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. v. United States

Entry No. 1137-K, etc.

(Decided September 30, 1959)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Lout,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivek, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiffs and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States concerning the merchandise referred to in the attached Schedule A, as follows:

> 1. Said merchandise consists of binoculars and leather carrying cases which, in *John P. Herder & Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*C.D. 1519, this Court held to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of articles.

> 2. At the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers, in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, are the unit prices shown in attached Schedule A, in U.S. currency, net, packed, the foreign value of such or similar merchandise being no .higher.

> 3. The above appeals for reappraisement are abandoned as to all entries and merchandise not listed in the attached Schedule A, and the said appeals for reappraisement may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts and following the cited decision on the law, I find and hold that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is the unit prices as set forth in said schedule “A,” in United States currency, net, packed.

The appeals for reappraisement, having been abandoned as to all other merchandise, are dismissed, except as to the merchandise identified in said schedule “A.”

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL DAVID WHITE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2276 GEB GGH P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On November 2, 2005, the court granted defendants’ May 19, 2005, motion to

dismiss with leave amend with respect to the following claims: 1) imposition of the R suffix

caused plaintiff to suffer from increased risk to safety as to defendants Rhodes and Jett; 2) the

claims against defendants Ceaglio and Schroers based on plaintiff’s failure to link these

defendants to the alleged deprivations. The court granted plaintiff thirty days to file a second

amended complaint.

Thirty days passed and plaintiff did not file a second amended complaint.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the November 2, 2005, the court recommends that these

claims against defendants Rhodes, Jett, Ceaglio and Schroers be dismissed.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02276-GEB-GGH Document 71 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the remaining claims

against defendants Rhodes, Jett, Ceaglio and Schroers be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: 1/18/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

wh2276.fr

Case 2:04-cv-02276-GEB-GGH Document 71 Filed 01/19/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 47909.

#### Protests 56868-K, etc., of Edward Boote et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the miniature chinaware in question is the same as that the subject of Abstract 47063. In accordance therewith, the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 212, as modified by the British Trade Agreement (T. D. 49753), was sustained.
Copy of Support Documents from 

Docket OPPTS-50635 

In Support of the 

Direct Final SNUR 

for P-95-0169 

January 5, 2000 

(65 FR 354) (FRL-6055-2) 

40 CFR 721.5185 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 65
Supporting Documents for OPPTS-50635 

B-0001 Economic Analysis of Expedited Significant 

New Use Rules for 41 Chemical Substances 

B-0008 Initial Review Engineering Report for P95-0159 

(Undated) 

B-0012 SAT Report for P95-0169 

B-0013 Initial Review Exposure Report for P95-0169 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 65
B-0001 Economic Analysis of 

Expedited Significant New Use 

 Rules for 41 Chemical Substances 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 26 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 27 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 28 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 29 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 30 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 31 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 32 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 33 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 34 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 35 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 36 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 37 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 38 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 39 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 40 of 65
B-0008 Initial Review Engineering 

 Report for P95-0159 (Undated) 

EPA SANITIZED Page 41 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 42 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 43 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 44 of 65
B-0012 SAT Report 

for P95-0169 

EPA SANITIZED Page 45 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 46 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 47 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 48 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 49 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 50 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 51 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 52 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 53 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 54 of 65
B-0013 Initial Review Exposure 

Report for P95-0169 

EPA SANITIZED Page 55 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 56 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 57 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 58 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 59 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 60 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 61 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 62 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 63 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 64 of 65
EPA SANITIZED Page 65 of 65
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 20, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130654 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

CONNIE E. HADDAD, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 130654 

 COA: 265639 

Ingham CC: 04-001502-AA

ADECCO USA, INC., and DEPARTMENT 

OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 26, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0913 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 20, 2006 

 Clerk
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jason C. Vercruysse, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 13]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of all charges and that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). The jury could properly find that defendant’s use of marihuana earlier in the day had caused the accident by impairing defendant’s ability to drive, and that defendant, an inexperienced, unlicensed driver, failed to perceive the substantial risk that he would lose control of his vehicle on a wet, winding road and cross into an oncoming traffic lane. Thus, the jury could properly find that defendant was criminally negligent (Penal Law §§ 125.10, 15.05 [4]) in operating a motor vehicle while so impaired *(see, People v Daley,*54 AD2d 1007, 1008) and was guilty of vehicular manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.12). (Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Strobridge, J.— Vehicular Manslaughter, 2nd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. CARLOS A. HAYNES, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 300 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 11th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
# C_2007214EN.01000901.xml

| 13.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/9

---

STATE AID — GREECE

STATE AID — GREECE

State aid C 44/06 (ex N 614/05) — Regional aid to textile, clothing and leather sector in Greece

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 214/06)

The Commission has decided to close the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty, initiated on 24 October 2006 (1) in respect of the measure referred to above, recording that Greece has withdrawn its notification on 27 February 2007.

1

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 7.12.2006, p. 38.

1

---
```
[Senate Hearing 111-679, Part 3]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]



 
                                [ERRATA]

                                                 S. Hrg. 111-679, Pt. 3

                      DEEPWATER HORIZON LIABILITY
=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               before the

                              COMMITTEE ON
                      ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                     ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                                   TO

RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THE LIABILITY AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ISSUES 
  RELATED TO OFFSHORE OIL PRODUCTION, INCLUDING THE DEEPWATER HORIZON 
 ACCIDENT IN THE GULF OF MEXICO, INCLUDING S. 3346, A BILL TO INCREASE 
  THE LIMITS ON LIABILITY UNDER THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF LANDS ACT

                               __________

                              MAY 25, 2010



[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]


                                Printed for the use of the
                    Committee on Energy and Natual Resource





                        U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
61-828 PDF                      WASHINGTON: 2010
_______________________________________________________________________
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing 
Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 
202-512-1800, or 866-512-1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. 









                                [ERRATA]


                         S. Hrg. 111-679, Pt. 3

    An error was made on the cover of S. Hrg. 111-679, Pt. 3. 
The hearing number should be ``S. Hrg. 111-653, Pt. 3'' not 
``S. Hrg. 111-679, Pt. 3''.

```