alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX. 4.29 Amendment - Thompson






AMENDING AGREEMENT NO. 2
THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT made effective as of the 12th day of March, 2015.
BETWEEN:
ONCOYLYTICS BIOTECH INC.,
("ONCOLYTICS")
- and -
BRADLEY GEORGE THOMPSON,
(the "Employee")
WHEREAS the Employee is an officer of Oncolytics whose terms of employment are set forth in the Executive Employment Agreement ("Employment Agreement") dated effective January 1, 2013;
AND WHEREAS Oncolytics and the Employee wish to amend the Employment Agreement;
NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amending Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows:
Section 1 – Amendments


The Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing Section 3(1) with the following:


“Commencing January 1, 2015, Oncolytics shall pay to the Employee a salary of FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY-ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED THIRTY-SIX DOLLARS AND SEVENTY CENTS ($551,936.70) CANADIAN per annum, exclusive of bonuses, benefits and other compensation, payable in equal installments of TWENTY-TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY-SEVEN DOLLARS AND THIRTY-SIX CENTS  ($22,997.36) CANADIAN on the 15th and last day of each month.”


   


Section 2 – Effective Date


(1)    This Amending Agreement shall be effective from and after January 1, 2015.


(2)    In all other respects the parties confirm that the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.
	
				
	 
	 
	ONCOLYTICS BIOTECH INC.



	Per:
	/s/ Matthew Coffey

	 
	 
	 
	Matthew Coffey, Ph.D.
Chief Operating Officer

	 
	 
	Per:
	/s/ Kirk Look

	 
	 
	 
	Kirk Look
Chief Financial Officer






	
			
	/s/ Margaret Kowalczewski
	 
	

/s/ Bradley Thompson

	WITNESS
	 
	BRADLEY G. THOMPSON
# C_2007028EN.01000501.xml

| 8.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/5 |
| -------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------ |

---

Extract of a winding up measure decided under Article 9 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions

(2007/C 28/03)

The Board of Financial and Capital Market Commission in the Republic of Latvia on 21 December 2006 has taken Decision No 215 and decided to:

| 1. | Withdraw the licence granted to JSC OGRES KOMERCBANKA (legal address: 12 E. Birznieka-Upisa St., Riga, LV-1050, Latvia; registration No 40003150023), |
| -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

| 2. | File a petition for liquidation of the JSC OGRES KOMERCBANKA to the Riga District Court. |
| -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

| Credit Institution | JSC OGRES KOMERCBANKA 12 E. Birznieka-Upisa St., LV-1050 Riga, Latvia; registration No 40003150023 | JSC OGRES KOMERCBANKA | 12 E. Birznieka-Upisa St., LV-1050 Riga, Latvia; registration No 40003150023 |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| JSC OGRES KOMERCBANKA | | | |
| 12 E. Birznieka-Upisa St., LV-1050 Riga, Latvia; registration No 40003150023 | | | |
| Date | 23 January 2007 | | |
| Entry into force | 23 January 2007 | | |
| Nature of Decision | Opening of liquidation proceedings
Appointment of the liquidator | | |
| Competent authority | Riga District Court | | |
| Supervisory authority | Financial and Capital Market Commission 1 Kungu St. LV-1050 Riga Latvia Phone (371) 777 48 00 | Financial and Capital Market Commission | 1 Kungu St. |
| Financial and Capital Market Commission | | | |
| 1 Kungu St. | | | |
| LV-1050 Riga | | | |
| Latvia | | | |
| Phone (371) 777 48 00 | | | |
| Appointed liquidator | Mr. Andris Rukmanis 72 Brivibas St. LV-1011 Riga Latvia Phone (371) 29 20 61 37, (371) 781 38 92 Email: rukmanis@ar.lv | Mr. Andris Rukmanis | 72 Brivibas St. |
| Mr. Andris Rukmanis | | | |
| 72 Brivibas St. | | | |
| LV-1011 Riga | | | |
| Latvia | | | |
| Phone (371) 29 20 61 37, (371) 781 38 92 | | | |
| Email: rukmanis@ar.lv | | | |

---
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of i-CABLE Communications Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officers knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                    |  |        |  |                        
|------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: June 30, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Stephen T. H. Ng   
|                    |  | Name:  |  | Stephen T. H. Ng       
|                    |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |       
|                    |  | By:    |  | /s/ Samuel S. F. Wong  
|                    |  | Name:  |  | Samuel S. F. Wong      
|                    |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



1
EXHIBIT 32





Section 1350 Certifications







I, Andrew K. Walker, certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Allied Bancshares, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Allied Bancshares, Inc.







|/s/Andrew K. Walker
President and Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------





|Date:   August 11, 2006
|-----------------------



I, Richard E. Bell, certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Allied Bancshares, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Allied Bancshares, Inc.





|/s/Richard E. Bell
Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  August 11, 2006
|----------------------









16
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Security for the Protection of the Public Financial 
Responsibility To Meet Liability Incurrred for Death or Injury to 
Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages; Notice of Issuance of 
Certificate (Casualty)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for 
Death or Injury to Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages pursuant to 
the provisions of Section 2, Public Law 89-777 (46 App. U.S.C. 817(d)) 
and the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 
CFR Part 540, as amended:

Ambassadors International, Inc.; Ambassadors Cruise Group, LLC d/b/a 
Majestic America Line, DQSC Operations, LLC d/b/a Delta Queen Steamboat 
Company; American West Steamboat Company LLC d/b/a American West 
Steamboat Company; DQ Boat, LLC; AQ Boat, LLC; MQ Boat, LLC; EN Boat 
LLC; and QW Boat Company LLC, 1071 Camelback Street, Newport Beach, CA 
92660.
Vessels: AMERICAN QUEEN, DELTA QUEEN, MISSISSIPPI QUEEN, EMPRESS OF THE 
NORTH, QUEEN OF THE WEST, COLUMBIA QUEEN.

Carnival Corporation (d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines), MSRM 820N, 3655 NW 
87 Avenue, Miami, FL 33178.
Vessel: CARNIVAL FREEDOM.

C.I.C. Classic International Cruises S.A. and Arcalia Shipping Co. 
Ltd., 5-Piso, Avenida 24 De Julho 126, Lisboa Portugal 1530-346.
Vessel: ATHENA.

Corporation Ferries Del Caribe, Inc. d/b/a Ferries Del Caribe Calle 
Concordia <greek-i>249, 2nd Floor, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 00680 6448.
Vessel: CARIBBEAN EXPRESS.

MSC Crociere S. P. A. d/b/a MSC Cruises, Burnous Investment Corporation 
Panama, and Cruises International S.A., 250 Moonachie Road, Moonachie, 
NJ 07074.
Vessel: LIRICA.

MSC Crociere S.A. d/b/a MSC Cruises, Lycoper Holdings Inc. Panama, and 
Cruises International S.A., 250 Moonachie Road, Moonachie, NJ 07074.
Vessel: OPERA.

NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. d/b/a NCL, 7665 Corporate Center Drive, Miami, FL 
33126.
Vessel: NORWEGIAN PEARL.

Regatta Acquisition, LLC., Oceania Cruises, Inc. And V.Ships Leisure 
S.A.M., 8300 NW 33rd Street, Miami, FL 33122.
Vessel: REGATTA.

Regent Seven Sea Cruises, Inc. and Celtic Pacific (UK) Two Limited, 
1000 Corporate Drive, Suite 500, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334.
Vessel: SEVEN SEAS NAVIGATOR.

    Dated: March 2, 2007.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4105 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
2. Delaware State News -Affidavit of Publication for Legal Notice of Public Hearing

3. News Journal -Affidavit of Publication for Legal Notice of Public Hearing

4. Proposed Visibility SIP -Register Notice in Delaware Register of Regulations,

Vol. 12. Issue 3, Monday, September 1, 2008.

5. Copy of Notice of Public Hearing from the Delaware Statewide Calendar of

Meetings and Events

6. 40 CFR Part 51, Regional Haze Regulation — Final Rule, July 1999

7. 40 CFR Part 51, Regional Haze Guidelines for Best Available Retrofit

Technology (BART) Determinations (Appendix Y), July, 2005.

8. DNREC letter to Federal Land Managers (FLM) requesting comment on the

draft Visibility SIP in according 40 CFR 51.308(i)

9. U.S. Department of Interior (IOI) Comments on Delaware’s Draft Proposed

Visibility SIP in according 40 CFR 51.308(1)

10. DNREC Letter to DOl Acknowledging the Receipt of Their Comments on the

draft Visibility SIP

11. DNREC Response To DOl Comments On Delaware’s Draft Proposed Visibility

SIP

12. August 15, 2008 Email to Tim Allen, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service detailing

DNREC revisions to the draft SIP BART determinations

13. Conectiv Edgemoor Comments on Delaware’s Proposed August 15, 2008

Visibility State Implementation Plan

14. Minor Grammatical and Technical Changes, pp. 68, 70, 71 and 74.
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Agri-Med Techynologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger L. Fidler, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Roger L. Fidler------------------------------------     Roger L. Fidler,     Chief Financial Officer 

Date:    November 21, 2005

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SCALE 1:24,000

PETERSHAM QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILE

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-I

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Petersham Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by Janet R. Stone

2013

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1969.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Massachusetts

Geological Survey.

Geology mapped by J.R. Stone in 1976 (unpublished). Some

postglacial units were mapped using 2005 orthophoto images.

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 10 of 24)

(Q

UA

B

BIN

R

E

S

E

R

V

OIR)

(B

A

R

R

E)

(WARE)

(ATHOL)

72°7'30"W

72°7'30"W

72°15'0"W

72°15'0"W

42°30'0"N

42°30'0"N

42°22'30"N

42°22'30"N

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

AND OFFICE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (MassGIS),

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION

Stone, J.R., compiler, 2013, Surficial geologic map

of the Mount Grace-Ashburnham-Monson-Webster

24-quadrangle area in central Massachusetts:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-I

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/I.
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Robert J. Messey, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arch Western Resources, LLC.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004/s/ ROBERT J. MESSEYRobert J. MesseyVice President
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Philip E. Soran, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Compellent Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 20, 2007     /s/ Philip E. Soran  Philip E. Soran  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 10, 2009
    /s/ Heath B. ClarkeHeath B. ClarkeChief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) and Chairman/s/ Brenda AgiusBrenda AgiusChief Financial Officer 
(principal financial and accounting officer) and Secretary
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v PAUL E. BERRY, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

17 USCMA 164, 37 CMR 428

No. 20,240

July 28, 1967

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent, Major David J. Passamaneck,*and *Captain Robert R. Bróxton*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel David Rarick, Major John F. Webb, Jr.,*and *Captain William R. Steinmetz*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The petition for review is granted; the decision of the board of review is reversed; and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. The board is directed to take action in accordance with our decision in United States v DuBay, 17 USCMA 147, 37 CMR 411.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1736

BRENDA M. LOCKLEAR, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus KECIA GAITHER, M.D., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:04-cv-00111-F) Submitted: March 30, 2007 Decided: April 20, 2007 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry M. Coe, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellant. Charles D. Creech, W. Gregory Merritt, HARRIS, CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* Locklear originally brought suit in the North Carolina Superior Court for Robeson County. Gaither, a New York resident, removed the action to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2000). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Brenda Locklear appeals from the jury verdict in favor of Kecia Gaither, M.D., whom Locklear named as the sole Defendant in a medical malpractice action. * Locklear contends that the district court improperly instructed the jury on the governing law and that the district court abused its discretion in declining to instruct the jury in accordance with her proposed instructions. Because we find neither of Locklear’s contentions have merit, we affirm. This court reviews de novo whether a district court’s instructions are a correct statement of the law. Emergency One, Inc. v. American FireEagle, Ltd. , 228 F.3d 531, 538 (4th Cir. 2000). In reviewing the instructions, however, “we are mindful that district courts are necessarily vested with a great deal of discretion in constructing the specific form and content of jury instructions, and they are not required to accept all the suggested instructions offered by the parties.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We review a district court’s decision to give (or not to give) a jury instruction for abuse of discretion. SeeUnited States v. Abbas , 74 F.3d 506, 513 (4th Cir. 1996). A district court abuses its discretion when it fails or refuses to exercise- 3 - its discretion or when its exercise of discretion is flawed by an erroneous legal or factual premise. James v. Jacobson , 6 F.3d 233, 239 (4th Cir. 1993). When jury instructions are challenged on appeal, the issue is whether, taken as a whole, the instructions fairly stated the controlling law. United States v. McQueen , 445 F.3d 757, 759 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 127 S. Ct. 116 (2006). We have thoroughly reviewed the jury instructions given by the district court and conclude that they accurately apprised the jury of the governing law. Further, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to give the jury instructions proposed by Locklear. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
*No. 47922.*

#### Protests 91535-K (B), etc., of Black Knight China, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

After an examination of the official papers the court dismissed the protests.