alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CertificationsPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersigned officers of Witness Systems, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge and belief that theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated:  March 30, 2007 |   |     |                       |
|----------------------------------|--------|----------|----------------------------|
|                             |   |     |                       |
|                             |   |     |                       |
|                             | BY:    |     | /S/ NICHOLAS  DISCOMBE     |
|                             |   |     |                       |
|                             |   |     |                       |
|                             |   |     | Nicholas  Discombe         |
|                             |   | * * | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 
| Dated:  March 30,  2007 |   |     |                       |
|-----------------------------------|--------|----------|----------------------------|
|                              |   |     |                       |
|                              |   |     |                       |
|                              | BY:    |     | /S/ WILLIAM F.  EVANS      |
|                              |   |     |                       |
|                              |   |     |                       |
|                              |   |     | William F. Evans           |
| * *                          |   | * * | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Witness Systems, Inc. and willbe retained by Witness Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
No. 38868.

#### Protests 788484-G (A), etc., of International Products Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Hínchelos, J.

On the authority of *United States*v. *Field*(25 C. C. P. A. 308, T. D. 49422) and *Anniston*v. *Davis*(301 U. S. 337) the protests were dismissed.
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, Danny
W Weibling, certify that:





1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB/A of International Monetary
Systems, LTD.;





2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under my supervision, to  ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)  disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and





5.  The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design


or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and





b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date:
April 1, 2008





By: /s/
Danny W
Weibling


Danny W
Weibling


Chief
Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Fred F. Finn, as Director of O. D. Heck Developmental Center, Petitioner, v Leonard C., Respondent. Dennis C. Vacco, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 262]

—White, J.

Appeal from that part of a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kahn, J.), entered March 30, 1995 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Public Health Law § 2973, declared Public Health Law § 2965 (3) (c) (iv) to be unconstitutional.

At the time this proceeding was commenced, respondent was a 67-year-old profoundly mentally retarded individual, residing in Valatie North Community Residence in the Village of Valatie, Columbia County, an entity within petitioner’s area of supervision. Even though he was not suffering from any life-*897threatening illness, respondent’s sister, his legal guardian appointed under SCPA article 17-A, asked respondent’s personal physician to issue a "do not resuscitate” (hereinafter DNR) order as she was concerned about respondent’s quality of life if he suffered a cardiac arrest and was resuscitated. The order was issued on July 14, 1994 on the ground that resuscitation would be medically futile pursuant to Public Health Law § 2965 (3) (c) (iii).

On July 18, 1994 respondent was examined by petitioner’s chief medical officer and her associate who concluded that a DNR order was not warranted. Petitioner then commenced this proceeding to remove and rescind the DNR order. Following an evidentiary hearing, during which the question of whether resuscitation would impose an extraordinary burden on the patient was raised (Public Health Law § 2965 [3] [c] [iv]), Supreme Court granted the petition and further declared that Public Health Law § 2965 (3) (c) (iv) is unconstitutionally vague. The Attorney-General, in his statutory standing and capacity pursuant to Executive Law § 71, concurs that Supreme Court’s removal of the DNR order was proper but appeals from the declaration that Public Health Law § 2965 (3) (c) (iv) is unconstitutional.

Initially, we note that this proceeding appears to have been premature in that the parties did not submit their disagreement to the dispute mediation system *(see,*Public Health Law §§ 2972, 2973 [3]). Furthermore, Supreme Court should not have reached the constitutional issue since there were alternative grounds upon which to dispose of this proceeding *(see, People v Felix,*58 NY2d 156, 161, *appeal dismissed*464 US 802). Accordingly, we shall modify Supreme Court’s judgment by vacating its declaration that Public Health Law § 2965 (3) (c) (iv) is unconstitutionally vague.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, without costs, by vacating the second decretal paragraph thereof, and, as so modified, affirmed.
No. 55999.

protests 134133-K and 139327-K (New York).

#### B. L. Pulver *&*Son and L. Rausnitzova *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
**Exhibit 31.1**I, Paul A. Lang, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arch Western Resources, LLC;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e), and 15d-15(e)) and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: November 14, 2005     /s/ Paul A. Lang   Paul A. Lang  President  43
II 

Calendar No. 634 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4936 

To require a study relating to the Minidoka National Historic Site. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Mr. RISCH (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Reported by Mr. MANCHIN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To require a study relating to the Minidoka National Historic 

Site. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GAO STUDY ON THE MINIDOKA NATIONAL HIS4 TORIC SITE. 

5 The Secretary of the Interior may not issue any au6 thorization for the project described in the notice of avail7 ability of the Bureau of Land Management entitled ‘‘NoVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:50 Nov 22, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4936.RS S4936

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4936 RS

1 tice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact 

2 Statement for the Proposed Lava Ridge Wind Project in 

3 Jerome, Lincoln, and Minidoka Counties, ID’’ (89 Fed. 

4 Reg. 48681 (June 7, 2024)) (or a substantially similar 

5 project) unless and until the date on which the Comp6 troller General of the United States completes a report 

7 identifying potential adverse effects of the project on or 

8 to the Minidoka National Historic Site, wildlife, cultural 

9 resources, transportation, hunting, wetlands, and con10 nected surface water and groundwater. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 634 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4936 

A BILL 

To require a study relating to the Minidoka 

National Historic Site. 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1. | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September                30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                ASAH Corp. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                November 13, 2006 |
|-----------------------------------------|

**ASAH      CORP.**

| By: | */s/                Zak W. Elgamal*Chief                Executive Officer and Chief                Financial Officer |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Walter Carlaftes, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 505]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered September 11, 1992, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the County Court should have *sua sponte*ordered him to undergo a psychiatric examination pursuant to CPL 730.30 prior to the jury reaching a verdict. There is no indication in the record that the defendant, as a result of any mental disease or defect, was incapable of understanding the proceedings against him or unable to assist in his own defense (CPL 730.10 [1]). The County Court is not obligated to order an examination in every case where a defendant has a history of mental problems *(see, People*
      *652
      *v Parker,*191 AD2d 717; *People v Truss,*187 AD2d 742; *People v Rogers,*163 AD2d 337).

Furthermore, the court granted the defendant’s request to order psychiatric examinations and a hearing to determine the defendant’s fitness to proceed to sentencing. The court did not err in concluding, after a hearing, that the defendant had the capacity to proceed to sentencing. The ultimate determination of this issue lies with the court *(People v Bolling,*114 AD2d 416, 417). Upon our review of the record, we are satisfied that the People sustained their burden of proving by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the defendant was not an incapacitated person *(see, People v Santos,*43 AD2d 73).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

David Wayne Elmore,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-2657 GEB PAN P

vs. Order

Tom L. Carey, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoDecember 16, 2004, plaintiff filed a complaint alleging

claims against twelve defendants. The Clerk of Court

inadvertently omitted one defendant, Traquina, from the case

caption. April 8, 2005, the court approved service on all

defendants and sent plaintiff USM-285 forms to complete for

service. April 20, 2005, plaintiff notified the court Traquina

had been omitted. 

Good cause appearing, the court hereby orders that:

1. Service is appropriate for defendant Traquina. 

Case 2:04-cv-02657-GEB-EFB Document 10 Filed 05/26/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285

form. 

3. Within 10 days plaintiff shall complete the attached

Notice of Submission of Documents and submit it to the court with

the completed USM-285 form and one copy of the December 16, 2004,

pleading.

4. Upon receipt of the necessary materials, the court will

direct the United States Marshal to serve defendants pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.

Dated: May 26, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02657-GEB-EFB Document 10 Filed 05/26/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

David Wayne Elmore,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-2657 GEB PAN P

vs. Notice of Submission of Documents

Tom L. Carey, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff hereby submits the following documents in

compliance with the court's order filed :

 completed summons form

 completed forms USM-285 

 copies of the 

 Complaint

Dated: 

 _________________________________

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-02657-GEB-EFB Document 10 Filed 05/26/05 Page 3 of 3
|  | (1) | the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q      of Debut Broadcasting Corporation Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,      2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)  | the information contained in the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fairly      presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of Debut Broadcasting Corporation  Inc. |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/      Ronald Heineman                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Ronald      Heineman                          |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer and Director |
| Date:  | April      20, 2010                           |
|   |                                          |
| By:    | /s/      Sariah Hopkins                       |
| Name:  | Sariah      Hopkins                           |
| Title: | Principal      Financial Officer              |
| Date:  | April      20,2010                            |
No. 65530.

#### Bonwit Teller, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/18622 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon knit outerwear similar in use to silk knit outerwear and following *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         3,218
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,105
<PP&E>                                         1,969
<DEPRECIATION>                                 885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          30,214
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       275,560
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,230,435)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,189
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               39,253
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  778,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (739,192)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (739,192)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (739,192)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.03


</TABLE>