alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007319EN.01002101.xml

| 29.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/21

---

Corrigenda to information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 231 of 3 October 2007
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 231 of 3 October 2007

(2007/C 319/10)

On page 8, Aid XE 24/07 reads as follows:

| ‘Aid No | XE 24/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | Asturias |
| Title of aid scheme | Subvenciones a los promotores de proyectos de empleo con apoyo |
| Legal basis | Real Decreto no 870/2007, de 2 de julio (B.O.E. de 14 de julio), por el que se regula el programa de empleo con apoyo como medida de fomento de empleo de personas con discapacidad en el mercado ordinario de trabajo; bases reguladoras de la concesión de subvenciones a los promotores de proyectos de empleo con apoyo aprobadas por Resolución del Servicio Público de Empleo del Principado de Asturias de 25 de septiembre de 2007 (Boletín Oficial del Principado de Asturias de 16 de octubre de 2007). |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 0,12 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1.10.2007 |
| Duration | 30.9.2008 |
| Objective | Art. 6: Employment of disabled workers |
| Economic sectors | All Community sectors  (1)eligible for employment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Servicio Público de Empleo del Principado de Asturias |
| Plaza de España, 1, planta baja |
| E-33007 Oviedo (Asturias) |

‘Aid No

XE 24/07

Member State

Spain

Region

Asturias

Title of aid scheme

Subvenciones a los promotores de proyectos de empleo con apoyo

Legal basis

Real Decreto no 870/2007, de 2 de julio (B.O.E. de 14 de julio), por el que se regula el programa de empleo con apoyo como medida de fomento de empleo de personas con discapacidad en el mercado ordinario de trabajo; bases reguladoras de la concesión de subvenciones a los promotores de proyectos de empleo con apoyo aprobadas por Resolución del Servicio Público de Empleo del Principado de Asturias de 25 de septiembre de 2007 (Boletín Oficial del Principado de Asturias de 16 de octubre de 2007).

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 0,12 million

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1.10.2007

Duration

30.9.2008

Objective

Art. 6: Employment of disabled workers

Economic sectors

All Community sectors  (1)eligible for employment aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Servicio Público de Empleo del Principado de Asturias

Plaza de España, 1, planta baja

E-33007 Oviedo (Asturias)

---

(1)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all State aid within the sector.’

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 8256)

#### Samuel Barotz *&*Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 713832, etc.

(Decided October 30, 1953)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement set forth in the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as the issues involved in *United States*v. *New York Merchandise Co., Inc.,*A. R. D. 17, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise covered by the invoices subject to the reappraisements herein, less the item of a buying commission of 7)4% as noted on the invoices and deducted on entry, are equal to the price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the item of a buying commission of *T%*per centum ad valorem, as noted on the invoices and deducted on entry.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Home Mortgage Investment
Corp. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stephen A. Hozie, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.


May 5, 2005


                                    /s/ Stephen A. Hozie
                                ----------------------------------------------
                                Stephen A. Hozie
                                 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                     Officer
No. 45005.

#### Protest 710544-G of S. S. Kresge Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliveb. P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of beach balls similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Woolworth*(24 C. G. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770). The claim at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 was therefore sustained.
EX-10.1



 EXHIBIT 10.1 

RATE APPLICABLE TO 

PARTICIPATING DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS UNDER THE 

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

Effective for the 2017 plan year, the Board of Directors and its Compensation Committee have approved an applicable interest rate for the Directors and
Executives Deferred Compensation Plan of 9.28%. That rate is a decrease from the 10.16% rate in effect for 2016, and applies prospectively to certain participants, including all participants who presently are directors or officers of the registrant.
Rates are subject to annual approval by the Board, but generally remain in effect until changed. The new interest rate, within the context of the entire Plan, has been established at a level intended to provide both retention and long-term
non-compete incentives. When a participant retires after 2010 due to mandatory retirement, the participant’s interest rate during retirement will be the highest rate in place over the past three years—that is, the highest of the rates
applicable during the year of retirement and the previous two years.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wired Associates Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacqueline Winwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th day of September, 2009.


/s/ Jacqueline Winwood
---------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
(Reap. Dec. 10775)

#### Henry A. Wess, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 644.

(Decided June 10, 1964)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*■John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

EiohaedsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon .a stipulation, reading as follows:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the items marked “A” and initialed JEJ by Examiner J. E. Jedlicka on the invoice accompanying the entry covered by the above-named reappraisement appeal, which consist of mechanical robot calendars exported from Denmark to the United States during the period from March, 1952 through June, 1954, appraised on the basis of “cost of production” as defined in Section 402(f) Tariff Act of 1930 (prior to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956) at 16.2585 Danish kroner per piece, net packed, including a royalty of 1.96 Danish kroher' to Gleerup Moller and a-commission of 0.5176 Danish kroner to Hansen & Co., of the same kind in all material respects, and sold to the importer herein under the same marketing and sales conditions as the merchandise and market and sales conditions involved in the case of *United States*v. *Henry A. Wess, Inc.,*A.R.D. 142, wherein it was held that the royalty and commission should not be included as a part of the “cost of production” dutiable value, and that the said “cost of production” was 13.7809 Danish kroner per calendar.

> *592That at or about the time of exportation neither such nor similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale for home consumption in Denmark, nor for exportation to the United States, nor freely offered for sale in the United States.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in the case of *United States*v. *Henry A. Wess, Inc.,*A.R.D. 142, be incorporated in the record in this case, and that the reappraisement appeal be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find:

1. That cost of production, as that value is defined in 19 U.S.C.A., section 1402(f) (section 402(f), Tariff Act of 1930, prior to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956), is the proper basis for determination of the value of the mechanical robot calendars described in the invoices accompanying the entry covered by the reappraisement appeal herein.

2. That cost of production of such calendars does not include a royalty of 1.96 Danish kroner per calendar, and a commission of 0.5176 Danish krone per calendar.

3. That the cost of production of each calendar is 13.7809 Danish kroner.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Before the Second Division,

March 11, 1952

No. 56465.

protest 151924-K (Memphis).

#### J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of articles of which metal was the component material of chief value and were not ores or concentrates or crude metal; that said articles were imported to be used in remanufacture by melting; and that since entry said articles were melted and remanufactured by melting. An examination of the papers in the case disclosed that affidavits have been filed in accordance with regulations-prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, *supra.*Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of East Coast Diversified Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2004 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Richard Margulies, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Richard Margulies

Richard MarguliesChief Executive OfficerDated: May 4, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to East Coast Diversified Corporationand will be retained by East Coast Diversified Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 38869.

#### Protests 943869-G, etc., of Bemis Bros. Bag Co. et al. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *United States*v. *Field*(25 C. C. P. A. 308, T. D. 49422) and *Anniston*v. *Davis*(301 U. S. 337) the protests were dismissed.
No. 55984.

protests 172910-K/3373, etc. (Chicago).

#### Marshall Field & Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BEVERLY BITTNER; ESTATE OF

DONALD SWISHER; and ANTHONY

COVARRUBIAS, ERIC COVARRUBIAS,

SABRINA COVARRUBIAS, ALEXANDER

COVARRUBIAS, and DANTE 

COVARRUBIAS, by and through

their Guardian ad Litem

LENETTE COVARRUBIAS,

NO. CIV. S-04-1901 LKK/KJM

Plaintiffs,

v. O R D E R

TERESA SCHWARTZ, Warden, California

Medical Facility; SGT. WALKER;

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER VAN;

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MAY;

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MILES;

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COOZ;

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PHAM;

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ARCHER; 

XUEWIE ZHU, M.D.; and WESLEY

McALLISTER, M.D.,

Defendants.

 /

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-01901-LKK -KJM Document 21 Filed 11/04/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court is in receipt of the joint request to extend

deadlines. After a telephonic Status Conference with the parties,

the court ORDERS that Status Order is MODIFIED as follows:

Exchange and filing of expert reports: December 21, 2005

Discovery motion cut off: February 6, 2006

Law and Motion cut off: April 6, 2006

Pretrial Conference: July 10, 2006 at 2:00 p.m.

Trial: October 11, 2006 at 10:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November 2, 2005

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01901-LKK -KJM Document 21 Filed 11/04/05 Page 2 of 2
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 11/3/2023 1

Abandoned Suit 

to Exclude Some Counties’ Presidential Votes 

Because of Some Alleged Irregularities 

Langenhorst v. Pecore 

(William C. Griesbach, E.D. Wis. 1:20-cv-1701) 

Four days after they filed their complaint, before any judicial review, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed a lawsuit that sought to exclude presidential votes from three counties on the basis of some alleged irregularities. 

Subject: Voting irregularities. Topics: Enjoining certification; 

intervention. 

Three voters filed a federal complaint in the Eastern District of Wisconsin 

against election officials for Wisconsin and three of its counties on November 12, 2020, alleging the “inclusion of illegal Presidential Elector results in 

certain counties.”1 The plaintiffs sought exclusion from the presidential election of all votes from those counties.2

 On the following day, the plaintiffs 

moved to expedite discovery and resolution of the case.3

Judge William C. Griesbach set the case for a telephonic status conference on November 16, posting contact information in the docket sheet.4

While three motions to intervene were pending,5 the plaintiffs filed on November 16 three notices voluntarily dismissing the case.6

1. Complaint at 1, Langenhorst v. Pecore, No 1:20-cv-1701 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 12, 2020), 

D.E. 1; Amended Complaint, id. (Nov. 12, 2020), D.E. 5; see Emily Bazelon, The Trump 

Campaign Has Filed 16 Lawsuits Contesting the Election, N.Y. Times, Nov. 16, 2020, at A16; 

Molly Beck, Suit Aims to Block Votes from Blue Counties, Milwaukee J. Sentinel, Nov. 13, 

2020, at A13; Lawsuit Wants Votes Excluded, Wis. State J., Nov. 14, 2020, at A3. 

2. Complaint, supra note 1, at 21. 

3. Motion, Langenhorst, No. 1:20-cv-1701 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 13, 2020), D.E. 7. 

4. Docket Sheet, id. (Nov. 12, 2020). 

5. Motions, id. (Nov. 13 to 15, 2020), D.E. 11, 13, 18. 

6. Notices, id. (Nov. 16, 2020), D.E. 25 to 27.
Exhibit 23.1













CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Reilistration Statement on Form S-8. SEC File No. 333-140437. of International Monetary Systems. Ltd. and the related prospectuses of our audit report dated March 20. 2010. with respect to the consolidated balance sheets at December 31. 2009 and 2008 and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. shareholders' equity and cash (lows of International Monetary Systems. Ltd. and its subsidiaries for the years ended December 31. 2009 and 2008 appearinil in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31. 2009.








/s/ WEBB & COMPANY. P.A.WEBB & COMPANY. P.A.

Certified Public AccountantsApril 2. 2010















1501 Corporate Drive, Suite 150 • Boynton Beach, FL 33426Telephone: (561) 752-1721 • Fax: (561) 734-8562www.cpawebb.com
<page>
											 EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partner-
ship.






By:	/s/Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:		President

Date:		March 27, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of ANC Rental Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William N.
Plamondon, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

    1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
         (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (except for the inclusion of
         audited financial statements (as opposed to unaudited) as of and for
         each of the two years ended December 31, 2001 as required by Regulation
         S-X); and

    2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
         the Company.

                                             /s/ WILLIAM N. PLAMONDON, III
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             William N. Plamondon, III
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             May 21, 2003
FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/23/2015 7:18:42 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Chemical Structure 

Substance No.1 

[ X] entire page is CBI
446 A.2d 668

#### Commonwealth v. Fish, Appellant.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied Nov. 5, 1982.

Argued January 26, 1982.

Cyril Daniel Higgins, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; James F. Marsh, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WIEAND, CIRILLO and POPOVICH, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

DANIEL W. FAERFERS and KATJA

FAERFERS,

NO. CIV. S 04-2690 MCE PAN

Plaintiffs,

v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CAVIAR CREATOR, INC., a Nevada

Corporation, individually and

as successor to CAVIAR

CREATOR, INC., an Oregon

Corporation,

Defendant.

----oo0oo----

Plaintiff Daniel W. Faerfers filed a motion on October 5,

2005, seeking a protective order regarding the location of his

deposition. Defendant Caviar Creator has noticed the deposition

of Daniel Faerfers for October 13, 2005, in Sacramento,

California. Plaintiff objects to Defendant’s demand that he be

deposed in Sacramento, California, as he currently resides in

Neuss, Germany. Plaintiff submits that requiring him to travel

Case 2:04-cv-02690-TLN-EFB Document 58 Filed 10/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1Because oral argument will not be of material assistance,

the Court orders this matter submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal.

Local Rule 78-230(h). 

2

to Sacramento for the purpose of deposing him would subject him

to annoyance, oppression, undue burden and expense based upon

time, expense and his current business circumstances.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(7) provides that the

Court may upon motion order that a deposition be taken by

telephone or other remote electronic means. For purposes of this

rule, a deposition taken by such means is taken in the district

and at the place where the deponent is to answer questions. Id.

Accordingly, the Court finds that the time and expense

Plaintiff will suffer outweighs Defendant’s need to have

Plaintiff appear personally. Good cause having been shown, the

Court orders that Plaintiff’s deposition be taken by telephone or

other remote electronic means. Plaintiff’s motion for a

protective order is GRANTED.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 7, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02690-TLN-EFB Document 58 Filed 10/07/05 Page 2 of 2