alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10454)

#### Universal Enterprises *v.*United States

Entry No. 33918.

(Decided February 26, 1963)

*Glad & Tuttle*for tbe plaintiff.

*John W. Dmiglas,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between tbe attorneys for tbe parties hereto:

> 1. That tbe above entitled appeal for reappraisement is limited to tbe merchandise shipped by Hasegawa & Co. Ltd. of Japan.

> 2. That tbe said merchandise was appraised under Section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Administrative Act of 1938.

> 3. That no foreign value, as defined by Section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Administrative Act of 1938, existed for such or similar merchandise.

> 4. That at tbe time of exportation to tbe United States, tbe prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in tbe principal markets of Japan, in tbe usual wholesale quantities and in tbe ordinary course of trade, for exportation to tbe United States, were tbe unit invoice values less tbe proportionate share of tbe inland freight, storage, hauling and lighter-age, insurance premium and petty shown on tbe invoices to be included in tbe unit invoice values.

> 5. That tbe above entitled appeal for reappraisement as heretofore limited, is submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value was the invoice unit value in each case, less the proportionate share of the inland freight, storage, hauling and lighter-age, insurance premium, and petty, shown on the invoice to be included in the unit invoice values.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 50492.

#### Protests 987156-G, etc., of Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nippon Co.*(32 C. C. P. A. 164, C. A. D. 303), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the merchandise represented by the items marked with the letter *“A”*on the invoices was held free of duty under paragraph 1705 as kelp; and that represented by the items marked with the letter *“B”*on the invoices was held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1540 as seaweeds, manufactured. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF				CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF				SUNRISE U.S.A. INCORPORATED				PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Omar G. Barrientos, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sunrise U.S.A. Incorporated (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Company fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial operations and results of operations of the Company.

| Date:  August 9, 2005                               |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |
| By:  /s/ OMAR G. BARRIENTOS     |
|                                                          |
| Omar G. Barrientos                                       |
| Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer              |

----
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v RICHARD C. BOWLING, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

14 USCMA 166, 33 CMR 378

No. 16,828

July 26, 1963

*Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Herrod, Captain Ronald L. Gainer,*and *First Lieutenant E. Pomeroy Williams*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Francis M. Cooper*and *First Lieutenant Mervyn Hamburg*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused was convicted of eleven specifications of issuing a worthless check with intent to defraud, in violation of Article 123a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 923a. A review of the record indicates there was sufficient evidence to place in issue the lesser offense of dishonorable failure to maintain funds in the bank to meet the checks on presentment, in violation of Article 134 of the Uniform Code, 10 USC § 934. However, the law officer failed to instruct the court-martial on the lesser offense as a reasonable alternative to that charged. The omission constitutes prejudicial error. United States v Margelony, 14 USCMA 55, 33 CMR 267.

The decision of the board of review is reversed and the findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for submission to a board of review for further action consistent with the opinion.

Judge Kilday concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

In United States v Margelony, 14 USCMA 55, 33 CMR 267, I set forth at length my reasons for concluding that Congress intended to embrace within the terms of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 123a, 10 USC § 923a, all bad check offenses previously punished under the provisions of Code, supra, Article 134, 10 USC § 934. In my view, therefore, there is no lesser included offense of dishonorable failure to maintain funds in the bank to meet the payment of a check on presentment, in violation of the latter Article. Accordingly, the law officer did not err when he limited the court-martial to consideration of the charged violations of Code, supra, Article 123a.

I would affirm the decision of the board of review.
Exhibit 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                          BANKENGINE TECHNOLOGIES INC.



It is hereby certified that:

1. The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the "Corporation") is
BankEngine Technologies Inc.

2. The Amended Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, is hereby
further amended by replacing Article FIRST thereof in its entirety as follows:

The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the "Corporation") is Syscan
Imaging, Inc.

And shall further amend the Certificate of Incorporation by adding the following
new sentences to the end of the first paragraph of Article FOURTH thereof:
""Upon the effectiveness (the "Split Effective Date") of the certificate of
amendment to the certificate of incorporation containing this sentence, each ten
(10) shares of the Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the date and time
immediately preceding April 2, 2004, the effective date of a reverse stock split
(the "Split Effective Date"), shall be automatically changed and reclassified,
as of the Split Effective Date and without further action, into one (1) fully
paid and nonassessable share of Common Stock. There shall be no fractional
shares issued. A holder of record of Common Stock on the Split Effective Date
who would otherwise be entitled to a fraction of a share shall have the number
of new shares to which they are entitled rounded to the nearest whole number of
shares. The number of new shares will be rounded up if the fractional share is
equal to or greater than 0.5 and rounded down if the fraction is less than 0.5.
No shareholders will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares."" 3. The
foregoing amendment was adopted in accordance with Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 4. This Certificate of Amendment shall
become effective at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Standard time, on April 2, 2004.

                                        Signed this 19th day of March, 2004.
                                        By:  /s/ Michael J. Xirinachs
                                             ------------------------
                                        Name: Michael J. Xirinachs
                                        Title: Chairman and CEO
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11.1 -- STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                FISCAL YEAR
                                                                   ENDED
                                                               SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                   2000
                                                               -------------
<S>                                                            <C>
COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Weighted average shares outstanding.........................      5,513,934
                                                                 ==========
Net income..................................................     $      984
                                                                 ==========
Basic earnings per share....................................     $     0.18
                                                                 ==========
COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Weighted average shares outstanding.........................      5,513,934
Dilutive impact of stock options, as determined by the
  application of the treasury stock method..................         96,548
                                                                 ----------
Weighted average shares and common stock equivalents........      5,610,482
                                                                 ==========
Net income..................................................     $      984
                                                                 ==========
Diluted earnings per share..................................     $     0.18
                                                                 ==========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cheviot Financial Corp. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the “Report”), I, Scott T. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cheviot Financial Corporation and will be retained by Cheviot Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/s/Scott T. SmithScott T. SmithChief Financial Officer





Date:  August 12, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11428-11429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4470]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of the 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of 
the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) is soliciting public comments, ideas, and 
suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 3, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227, or 
206-220-6096.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of the

[[Page 11429]]

Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, April 3, 2007 from 9 a.m. 
Pacific Time to 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time via a telephone conference 
call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, 
please call 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Dave Coffman, 
TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or you can 
contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. Due to limited conference 
lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone 
conference call meeting must be made with Dave Coffman. Mr. Coffman can 
be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

     Dated: March 6, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E7-4470 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**EXHIBIT 3.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

 

**TO THE**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

 

**OF**

 

**“W.O. PRODUCTION COMPANY, LTD.”**

 

***FIRST:                 ***The name of theentity is “W.O. PRODUCTION COMPANY, LTD.”

 

***SECOND:*****            **The originalCertificate of Limited Partnership was filed on November 15, 1996.   Thefiling number issued to the limited partnership by the secretary of state is 9295410.

 

***THIRD:*****                **The registeredagent and registered office of the entity as currently shown on the records ofthe secretary of state are:

 

Capitol Corporate Services, Inc.

800 Brazos, Suite 400

Austin, Texas  78701

 

***FOURTH:***             Article I is deleted in its entirety and replacedwith the following:

 

“I

 

Thename of the limited partnership is W.O. Production Company, Ltd.”

 

***FIFTH:*****                **ThisCertificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership is authorizedby the General Partner pursuant to the Texas Revised Limited Partnership Actand by the governing documents of the limited partnership.

 

***SIXTH:*****                 **ThisCertificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership shall becomeeffective upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Texas.

 

***Remainder of page left intentionally blank.***

 

----

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned executedthis Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership as ofthe 13th day of March, 2008.

 

 
|   | **GENERAL  PARTNER:** |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   |                  |
|   | **WO  ENERGY, INC.**  |
|   | a  Texas corporation  |
|   |                  |
|   |                  |
|   | By:                   |   /s/  Morris B. Smith |
|   |                  | Name: | Morris  B. Smith |
|   |                  | Title: | Vice  President and CFO |
|        |                       |  |  |  |

 

----
**Exhibit 31(a)**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Martin S. Lapera, certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Frederick CountyBancorp, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 4, 2006 |   | /s/ Martin S.  Lapera                  |
|-------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|              |   | Martin S. Lapera                       |
|              |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

A-570-908


Notice of Correction of Initiation of Antidumping Duty 
Investigation: Sodium Hexametaphosphate from the People's Republic of 
China

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin C. Begnal or Christopher D. 
Riker, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-1442 or (202) 482-3441, respectively.

CORRECTION:

    On March 6, 2007, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
published the notice of initiation of the antidumping duty 
investigation of sodium hexametaphosphate from the People's Republic of 
China. See Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Sodium 
Hexametaphosphate from the People's Republic of China, 72 FR 9926 
(March 6, 2007) (``Initiation Notice''). Subsequent to the signature of 
the Initiation Notice, we identified an inadvertent error in the above-
referenced notice.
    Specifically, the case number listed in the Initiation Notice was 
incorrect. It should read A-570-908.

Conclusion

    This notice serves solely to correct the case number as it was 
listed in the Initiation Notice. The Department's findings in the 
Initiation Notice remain unchanged. This notice is issued and published 
in accordance with section 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended.

    Dated: March 6, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-4501 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
EXHIBIT 31.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Dyas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2006                   By: /s/ James Dyas
                                       James Dyas, Director and
                                       Principle Financial Officer