alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

KINGSAIRE, INC. d/b/a KINGS AIRE,

INC.,

Appellant,

v.

JORGE MELENDEZ,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00372

- CV

On Appeal from the

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(Cause No

. 2009

- 4709)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5 , on the judgment and all

costs, both in this Court and the court below, for which let execution issue. This decision shall

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2013.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Before the Third Division,

October 6, 1949

No. 53599.

protests 46615-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Lexter Kossie#700661 William McConnell Unit 3001 South Emily Drive Beeville, Texas 78102
July 6, 2015

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals P.o. BOX 12308, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 

## RECEIVED IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS 

## JUL 13

## 2il15

RE: CASE NO.lO, 978-38 (Requesting status of**pen~iJ,HJ**

## 1**A:.~R~*Ld,~~fripn)** Tr.Ct. No. 679887-T**~u~~~~~--·~ih**
Dear Clerk: On or about May 13, 2015, I filed. an application for writ of habeas corpus with the 185th district court in Harris County. This Court received and presented the application on May 28; 2015 as indicated on the white-card in which I received. Please inform me of the status of this application in the above-referenced case number as soon as possible. Thank you for your kind assistance.Sincerely,

# ~~ Lexter Koss1e cc: Fi1e Pro se Applicant
446 A.2d 679

#### Commonwealth v. Jennings, Appellant.

Submitted May 22, 1981.

David G. Metinko, for appellant; Robert L. Eberhardt, Deputy District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, MONTGOMERY and VAN der VOORT, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
No. 55279.

#### Wm. A. Force & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 141940-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 59611.

protests 160626-K, etc. (New York).

#### I. Freeman & Son, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers and smoothing irons, the composition of which is the same in all material respects as the merchandise involved in *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261) and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-16-00552- CV The City of L ulin g, Appellan t

v. Guadalup e Blanco River A uthority, Appellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F CALDWELL CO UNTY, 421 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NO. 15- O- 544, H ONO RAB LE TO DD B LOM ERTH, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant has filed an agree d motion to dismiss the appea l, explaining that the parties have settled their di spute and neg otiated a new contract t hat renders moot the i ssues that wer e the subject of this appe al. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

__________________________________________ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and F ield Dismissed as Moot Filed: De cembe r 29, 2016
Exhibit 32

           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
                               FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to, and as required  by, 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that the  Amendment  No. 1 to Annual  Report of  Nathaniel  Energy
Corporation  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31,
2003 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and that information  contained in
such Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:   January 24, 2005
                                        /s/ George A. Cretecos
                                       -----------------------------------
                                        George A. Cretecos
                                        Chief Operating Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer
                                        and Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350),
the undersigned officer of Syscan Imaging, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2005 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                     /s/ Darwin Hu
Date:  April 17, 2006
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Darwin Hu, Chairman and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


         This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
No. 52304.

protests 133181-K, etc. (Portland, Oreg., and Seattle).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Oreg., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALONZO McKINNEY, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1678 LKK GGH P

vs.

DAVID ORTIZ, 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

In the answer filed January 20, 2005, respondent stated that it would lodge the

state court record shortly after filing the answer. Respondent has still not lodged this record.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days of the date of

this order, respondent shall lodge the relevant state court record.

DATED: 5/27/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

mck1678.fil

Case 2:04-cv-01678-LKK -GGH Document 28 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Renfrew,
Inc. for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2004, I, Zak W. Elgamal, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Renfrew, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
          30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Renfrew, Inc.

Dated:  November 22, 2004

RENFREW, INC.


By: /s/ Zak W. Elgamal
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia
ATLA NTA,

_________________ _ The Court of

Appeals hereby passes

the followi

ng order: A14A1709. LUSTER v. THE S TATE. The Appel l ant’s br

ief in this case wa s originall y due tobe filed on

June 5, 2014. The Appellant, who is representing himself, requested and was given tw o extensions of tim e to com plete his br

ief. H is brief w as due on August 11. On A ugust 14, this Court denied theAppellan t’s thir d request f

or an extensionof tim e to file h is brief. The Appe llant bela

tedly f iled his brief w ith this Cour t on August

19 along wi th amotion to reconsi der the Aug us t 1 4 d eni al o f hi s mot io n fo r an ext ens io n o f ti me to file his brief. Finding no le gitima te basis fo r granting

the m otion for

reconsideration, itis hereby

DENI ED. C onsequently , the insta nt appeal i s hereby

DISMISSED for failure to comply with the rules of this Court. S ee Court o f Appeal s Rules 15 ( a) and 23 (a). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Offi

ce, Atlant a,_______________

___ I certify t hat the abo ve is a true

extrac t from the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my signature a nd t he s eal of sai

d court hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 08/28/2014 August 28, 2014
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Basset Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  March 11, 2008 /s/ Cosmo Palmieri Chief Financial Officer
# C_2007192EN.01001301.xml

| 18.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 192/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 192/13

---

Update of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) [OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 25, OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 9]

(2007/C 192/10)

The publication of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (1) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the commission in conformity with Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code.

1

In addition to the publication in the OJ, a monthly update is available on the website of Directorate General Justice, Freedom and Security.

POLAND

New land border crossing point:

| | Pieńsk-Deschka: for traffic of persons (pedestrian and bicycle traffic), opened as of 1 June 2007 (open 24/7). |
| --- | --- |

Pieńsk-Deschka: for traffic of persons (pedestrian and bicycle traffic), opened as of 1 June 2007 (open 24/7).

| | Świnoujście-Garz: for traffic of persons (pedestrian, bicycle and bus traffic), opened as of 8 June 2007 (open 24/7). |
| --- | --- |

Świnoujście-Garz: for traffic of persons (pedestrian, bicycle and bus traffic), opened as of 8 June 2007 (open 24/7).

---

(1)  OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 1.

1

---
No. P68/275.

protests 66/4416, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### John A. Steer Co. *v.*United States,

*1051Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consist of coordinatographs or parts, dedicated for use therewith, in chief value of metal, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *John A. Steer Company*v. *United States*(53 CCPA 67, C.A.D. 879), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

The Honorable Mark Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1164

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Northern District of Iowa.

Willie Jones, also known as Douchy, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: July 29, 2004

Filed: August 11, 2004

 Vacated: August 27, 2004

 Reinstated: August 3, 2005 

___________

Before MELLOY, LAY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Willie Jones pleaded guilty to two drug offenses, one of which carried a

mandatory term of life imprisonment because of Jones’s two prior felony drug

convictions. After granting the government’s motion for a downward departure based

on Jones’s substantial assistance, the district court1

 sentenced Jones to 280 months

imprisonment and 10 years supervised release, and ordered $460 restitution. On
-2-

appeal, Jones’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the adequacy of the factual basis for the

plea, and the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines, including the

extent of the downward departure. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we affirm

for the following reasons.

Jones acknowledged he committed the acts comprising the elements of the

offenses to which he entered guilty pleas. See United States v. Marks, 38 F.3d 1009,

1012 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1067 (1995). We cannot review the

extent of the downward departure granted by the district court. See United States v.

Williams, 324 F.3d 1049, 1049-50 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam). We find no

misapplication of the Sentencing Guidelines, or any other nonfrivolous issues, see

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the

district court. 

We also grant defense counsel's motion to withdraw. Counsel is reminded of

the obligations under Part V of this Court's Amended Criminal Justice Act Plan.

Specifically, counsel is to advise the defendant of the right to file a petition for writ

of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, and to inform the defendant

as to the merits and likelihood of success in the filing of such a petition. If counsel

determines there are meritorious issues, defense counsel shall assist the defendant in

filing a petition for writ of certiorari. If counsel determines there are no meritorious

issues warranting the filing of a petition for writ of certiorari, counsel shall advise the

defendant of the procedures for filing a petition pro se, and the time limits for the

filing of such a petition. Counsel shall file a certification with the clerk within 30

days certifying that he has complied with his obligations under Part V.

______________________________
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1599 LKK JFM P

vs.

G. WOODFORD,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 28, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-01599-LKK -JFM Document 7 Filed 05/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 28, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S.

at 486-87.

DATED: May 19, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/camp1599.804

Case 2:04-cv-01599-LKK -JFM Document 7 Filed 05/20/05 Page 2 of 2
<SEQUENCE>5
<FILENAME>ims2005cfo906ex32-2.txt

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
                         Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350

                                   ----------

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of INTERNATIONAL MONETARY
SYSTEMS, LTS. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
(the "Report"), I, Danny W Weibling, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Danny W Weibling
-----------------------------
Danny W Weibling
Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2006
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 1000

 1500

 2000

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.48 N 77.37 W Meters AGL
Order entered August 5 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00079
- CV
EDDIE & SHIRLEY JONE S AND ALL OTHER OCCU PANTS, Appellant s V. HSBC BANK USA NATL A SSOCIATION, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13
- 06600
- A 

### O RDER Before Justice Moseley, O’Neill, and FitzGerald
W e construe appellants’ July 31, 2014 motion for extension of time to file brief as a motion for rehearing. We GRANT the motion to the exte nt that we WITHDRAW our July 31, 2014 opinion, VACATE our judgment associated with that opinion, and REINSTATE this appeal

. We ORDER appellants to file their brief no later than September 10, 2014 . We caution appellants that no extensions will be granted and that failure to timely file the brief will result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice.

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-221 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Research and Development 

 Memorandum of Agreement 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SINGAPORE 

Signed at Honolulu February 21, 2003 

with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
SINGAPORE 

Defense: Research and Development 

 Memorandum of agreement signed 

 at Honolulu February 21, 2003; 

 Entered into force February 21, 2003. 

 With annex. 










































NOTE: The title for Article XI differs from the title listed in the TOC for this Annex.
|   | (1) | the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q      of Debut Broadcasting Corporation Inc. for the quarter ended September 30,      2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,      fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and      results of operations of Debut Broadcasting Corporation      Inc. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Ronald      Heineman         |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Ronald      Heineman             |
|   | Title: | Principal      Executive Officer |
|   | Date:  | April      20, 2010              |
|   |   |                             |
|   | By:    | /s/ Sariah Hopkins_              |
|   | Name:  | Sariah      Hopkins              |
|   | Title: | Principal      Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  | April      20, 2010              |