'i'"RARTMFNITnF 

SERVED AUGUST 31 , 2010 ^ /^NSPOHIATION 

^CKET OPERATIONS 

ZOiC SEP - I p |: 3L| 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BRAVO AVIATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SO0006 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

DMSFAA-2010-0320 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE 

The Procedural Order, was served on June 8, 2010. Our hearing notice, which 

scheduled this case to be heard on September 3, 2010, was served on June 22, 2010. On 

August 25, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") 

moved for a continuance. In support, it states that its pending motion for judgment on the 

pleadings may, depending on the ruling of the undersigned, narrow the issues for trial, 

which in turn could obviate the need for certain witnesses. Complainant and its putative 

witnesses prefer a postponement - particularly in view of the forthcoming holiday 

weekend ~ to the current uncertainty attending the outcome of that motion. Complainant 

also cites the concurrence of the Respondent to the instant motion.' 

The Motion for Continuance is GRANTED. Judicial efficiency, and the 

convenience of the parties, compel that Complainant's pending motion for judgment on 

the pleadings be ruled upon before the parties make preparation for trial. The ruling, as 

Complainant states, could change impending travel plans for certain of its witnesses 

' It is curious that Respondent, who has failed to respond to the Complaint, the motion for judgment on the 

pleadings, the Procedural Order, and the Order to Show Cause (served August 16, 2010), should now 

weigh in on the question of a postponement. 
I 

shortly before the scheduled start of the trial. In these circumstances, a continuance is a 

reasonable solution.^ 

The hearing will be rescheduled by subsequent order. 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

^ The Order to Show Cause, issued in response to Complainant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, 

warned Respondent that its failure to fully and completely answer the Complaint and Order to Show Cause 

by August 23, 2010 could result in sanctions up to and including default. Defaulting Respondent would, of 

course, obviate the need for a hearing. 
FAA Docket No. CP10SO0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Robert J. Cullen 

Bravo Aviation, Inc., Respondent 

7000 Merrill Avenue, Suite 31 

Chino,CA 91710 

TEL: 909-606-8605 

FAX: 909-606-8639 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Southern Region, ASO-7 

Feder^al Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.