alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXH 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Larry S. Kramer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q/A of MarketWatch, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 3, 2004

By: /s/ Lawrence S. Kramer    Lawrence S. Kramer, Chief Executive Officer

---
CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Tryx Ventures Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
      
 
 
 By: /s/ Alessandra Bordon
  Name: Alessandra Bordon
  Title: President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
   Date: November 15, 2004
   
 By: /s/ Franco Perrotta
  Name: Franco Perrotta
  Title: Chief Financial Officer and Director
  Date: November 15, 2004
   1
446 A.2d 677

#### Commonwealth v. Davis, Appellant.

Argued October 15,1981.

Robert J. Tesone, for appellant; Charles S. Hersh, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WIEAND, JOHNSON and MONTEMURO, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report of City Telecom (H.K.) Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 31, 2012



/s/ To Wai BingName:

To Wai BingTitle:

Chief Executive Officer/s/ Wong Nga Lai, AliceName:

Wong Nga Lai, AliceTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# Hollan d& Knight

209 9 Pennsylvani a Avenue , N.W. , Suit e 10 0 | Washington , D C 2000 6 | T202.955.300 0 | F 202.955.556 4 Hollan d & Knigh t LL P | www.hklaw.co m
Anit a M . Mosne r (202)419-260 4 anita.mosner@hklaw.co m
Jun e 20 , 201 1
BYELECTRONI C MAI L Mr
. Georg e Wellingto n Divisio n Chief , Foreig n Ai rCarrie rLicensin g Divisio n (X-45 ) U.S
. Departmen tofTransportatio n 120 0 NewJerse yAvenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Join tApplicatio n ofSingapor e Airline s Limite d an d Ope n Join tStoc k Compan y Transaer o Airline s (Docke tOST-2011-0115 ) Dea rMr
. Wellington : B yApplicatio n date d Jun e 13 , 2011 , Singapor e Airline s Limite d an d Ope n Join tStoc k Compan y Transaer o Airline s ("Join t Applicants" ) applie d fo rstatement s ofauthorizatio n an d relate d exemptio n authorit yt o engag e i n reciproca l codesharin g betwee n Moscow , Russia n Federatio n an d Houston , Texas , an d beyon d Moscow
. Singapor e Airline s ha s polle d al l intereste d parties , an d n o partyha s objecte d t o th e Application
. Fo rthi s reason , th e Join tApplicant s respectfull yreques ttha t th e Departmen t promptl ygran t th e requeste d authority
. Respectfull ySubmitted , Hollan d & Knight , LL P

lit a M
. Mosne r Jennife rM
. Nowa k Attorney s fo rSingapor e Airline s

Atlanta | Bethesd a | Bosto n | Chicag o | For t Lauderdal e | Jacksonvill e | Lakelan d | Lo s Angeles | Miam i | Ne

wYor k Norther n Virgini a | Orland o | Portlan d | Sa n Francisco | Tallahasse e | Tamp a | Washington , D C | Wes t Pal m Beac hCERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E

I hereb ycertifytha tI b ycausin g a cop yt o hav e thi s dat e serve d th e foregoin g lette ro n th e person s identifie d belo w

b e sen tbyelectroni cmail
. RECIPIEN T Rober t Silverber g Joh n L
. Richardso n Car l B
. Nelso n Da n Weis s Alexande rVa n de r Belle n Sa m Whit e Joh n Alle n Angelin e Bird Sandr a Lunsfor d Russel l E
. Pomme r Anit a Mosne r Howar d Kas s Malcol m L
. Beng e Kri s Urs COMPAN Y AB X Amerije t America n Airline s Continenta l Airlines / Unite d Airline s Delt a Ai rLine s Evergree n Internationa l Airlines , Inc
. Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n FedE x Atla s Air , Inc
. UP S U S Airway s Worl d Airways , Inc
. U.S
. Departmen t of Stat e E-MAI L rsilverberq@sqbdc.co m irichardson@iohnlrichardson.co m carl.nelson@aa.co m dan.weiss@coair.co m sascha.vanderbellen@delta.co m sam.white@everqreenairlines.co m iohn.allen@faa.oo v anbird@fedex.co m sllunsford@fedex.co m rpommer@atlasair.com anita.mosner@hklaw.co m howar d kass@usairwavs.co m mlbenqe@zsrlaw.co m urskr@state.qo v


## (,w< A 7 ^ $/H&k

, Jennife rM
. Nowa k Jun e 20 , 201 1

#1041751 2 v l
II 

Calendar No. 699 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4898 

[Report No. 118–293] 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to include extreme heat in the definition of a major disaster. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2024 

Ms. ROSEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

DECEMBER 16, 2024 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, with an amendment and an amendment to the title 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to include extreme heat in the 

definition of a major disaster. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extreme Heat Emer5 gency Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4898 RS

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF MAJOR DISASTER. 

2 Section 102(2) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

3 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(2)) 

4 is amended by inserting ‘‘extreme heat,’’ before ‘‘or 

5 drought’’. 

6 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

7 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extreme Heat Emer8 gency Act of 2024’’. 

9 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF MAJOR DISASTER. 

10 Section 102(2) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

11 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(2)) is 

12 amended by inserting ‘‘extreme temperature,’’ before ‘‘or 

13 drought’’. 

14 SEC. 3. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS. 

15 No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated 

16 for the purpose of carrying out this Act. 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to amend the 

Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to include extreme temperature in the definition of a major disaster.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 699 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4898 

[Report No. 118–293] 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

treme heat in the definition of a major disaster. and Emergency Assistance Act to include exDECEMBER 16, 2024 

Reported with an amendment and an amendment to the 

title 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Grant Prideco, Inc.
 February 28, 2008
    
    /s/ MICHAEL MCSHANEName:
    
    Michael McShaneTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ MATTHEW D. FITZGERALDName:
    
    Matthew D. FitzgeraldTitle:
    
    Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Cardinal Minerals, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Roland Vetter President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/RolandVetter                                      
RolandVetter

Presidentand Chief Financial Officer

April14, 2004
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-505 

________________________________________________________________________ 

WEAPONS 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and LATVIA 

Signed at Washington December 11, 2001 

 

and 

Protocol Extending the Agreement 

Signed at Washington May 4, 2010 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 LATVIA 

 

 Weapons 

 Agreement signed at Washington 

 December 11, 2001; 

 Entered into force May 5, 2003. 

 And protocol extending the agreement. 

 Signed at Washington May 4, 2010; 

 Entered into force June 28, 2010.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                                         US$

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,473
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     67,171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               241,278
<PP&E>                                          95,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 957,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,679,797
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,763,377)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   957,693
<SALES>                                      1,598,027
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,598,027
<CGS>                                        1,335,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,133,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,610,795)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,610,795)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,610,795)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.62)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 936-937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-44]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-848]


Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People's Republic of 
China: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative and New Shipper Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: January 9, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin C. Begnal or Scot Fullerton, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1442 or (202) 482-1386, respectively.

Background

    On October 10, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
published the preliminary results of the administrative and new shipper 
reviews of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat 
from the People's Republic of China for the period September 1, 2004, 
through August 31, 2005. See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the 
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission 
of the 2004/2005 Administrative and New Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 59432 
(October 10, 2006) (``Preliminary Results''). The final results of 
these reviews are currently due by February 7, 2007.

Extension of Time Limit for Final Results

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (``the Act''), and section 351.213(h)(1) of the Department's 
regulations, the Department shall issue final results in an 
administrative review of an antidumping duty order within 120 days 
after the date on which the notice of preliminary results is published 
in the Federal Register. However, if the Department determines that it 
is not practicable to complete the review within the specified time 
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend 
this time period to 180 days.
    The Department has determined that completion of the final results 
of the aligned administrative and new shipper reviews within the 120-
day period is impracticable. The Department requires additional time to 
address the concerns of the interested parties as raised in their 
November 9, 2006, case briefs, and November 14, 2006, rebuttal briefs. 
Therefore, the Department is fully extending the time limit for 
completion of these final results to April 8, 2007, in accordance with 
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. However, because April 8, 2007, falls 
on a Sunday, the final results will be due no later than, April 9, 
2007, the next business day.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.


[[Page 937]]


    Dated: December 27, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-44 Filed 1-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of ASAH Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zak W. Elgamal, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, fully complies with the |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ASAH Corp. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   
| Dated: August 21, 2006 |
|------------------------|

 

**ASAH CORP.**

 
| By: | */s/ Zak W. Elgamal*Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DeWAYNE WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2510 FCD DAD P

vs.

BEAMS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed August 22, 2005, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do

so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:04-cv-02510-FCD-DAD Document 12 Filed 10/04/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 3, 2005.

DAD:lg

wash2510.fta

Case 2:04-cv-02510-FCD-DAD Document 12 Filed 10/04/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Clarence Brockington v. Central Life Insurance Co.

173 So. 908.

Division A.

Opinion Filed May 3, 1937.

Rehearing Denied Juno 2, 1937.

*Carroll Dunscombe,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Hampton, Bull*and *Crom*and *T. B. Ellis, Jr.,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

In this case writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of the defendant in the court below in a suit wherein the declaration was. in two counts. The first count was for conversion of an insurance policy of the alleged value of $250.00. The second count was for conversion and for punitive damages incident to such conversion.

Demurrer and motion to strike were interposed to both counts of the declaration and both were overruled.

Thereafter a number of pleas were filed to each count of the declaration. All of the pleas went down on demurrer except the first, eleventh and fourteenth.

The first plea was: “For a first plea to said second amended declaration, this defendant denies that the plaintiff is the owner of the policy described in the declaration.”

The eleventh plea was: “And for an eleventh plea to said declaration this defendant says it is not guilty.”

*251The fourteenth plea was: “For an additional plea to the first count of said second amended declaration this defendant says it has paid and discharged plaintiff’s claim by payment.”

On these pleas the plaintiff joined issue. The verdict of the jury was a general verdict in favor of defendant and against the plaintiff and was rendered upon direction of the court.

There is absolutely no evidence in the record that the defendant wrongfully retained possession of the insurance policy referred to in the declaration after the same was delivered to the defendant by the plaintiff. Therefore, there was no error in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant.

The judgment should be, and is, affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.