alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007027EN.01002001.xml

| 7.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/20

---

Commission notice concerning the date of application of the protocols on rules of origin providing for diagonal cumulation between the Community, Algeria, Egypt, Faroe Islands, Iceland, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Norway, Switzerland (including Liechtenstein), Syria, Tunisia, Turkey and West Bank and Gaza Strip

(2007/C 27/06)

Further to the Commission notice published in OJ C 220 of 13 September 2006, economic operators and customs authorities are hereby informed that the protocol on rules of origin providing for diagonal cumulation applied between Bulgaria and Israel from 1 April to 31 December 2006 and between Bulgaria and the European Union from 1 to 31 December 2006.

---
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fruit Of The Loom Unsecured Creditors Trust (the UCT) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Edward Clingman, Jr., a principal of Clingman & Hanger Management Associates, LLC, Trust Administrator of the UCT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the UCT.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | Clingman & Hanger Management Associates, LLC as
Trust Administrator of the Fruit Of The Loom UnsecuredCreditors Trust  /s/
W. Edward Clingman, Jr.
|                     |  |     |  | W. Edward Clingman, Jr.                                                                                                                           
|                     |  |     |  | Principal                                                                                                                                         



E-2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angelo Melito, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 566]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant waived the statutory right to a speedy trial by his guilty plea *(see, People v Friscia,*51 NY2d 845, 847; *People v Hemans,*197 AD2d 909, *lv denied*82 NY2d 850). His contention that he was deprived of the constitutional right to a speedy trial is without merit *(see, People v Taranovich,*37 NY2d 442, 444-445; *People v Moore,*159 AD2d 521, 522; *People v Collins,*98 AD2d 947, 948). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J.— Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVELLOUS A. GREENE SR., 

Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-04-1983 FCD KJM P 

vs.

CASTRO,

Defendant. ORDER FOR PAYMENT

 / OF INMATE FILING FEE

To: The Director of the California Department of Corrections, 1515 S Street, Sacramento,

California 95814:

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, is obligated to

pay the statutory filing fee in effect at the time of filing of this action, $150.00. Plaintiff has been

assessed an initial partial filing fee of $.83 for this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 

Upon payment of that initial partial filing fee, plaintiff will be obligated to make monthly

payments in the amount of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to plaintiff’s

trust account. The California Department of Corrections is required to send to the Clerk of the

Court the initial partial filing fee and thereafter payments from plaintiff’s prison trust account

each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00, until the statutory filing fee of $250.00 is

paid in full. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

Case 2:04-cv-01983-FCD-KJM Document 9 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Director of the California Department of Corrections or a designee shall

collect from plaintiff’s prison trust account an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $.83 and

shall forward the amount to the Clerk of the Court. Said payment shall be clearly identified by

the name and number assigned to this action.

2. Thereafter, the Director of the California Department of Corrections or a

designee shall collect from plaintiff's prison trust account the $149.17 balance of the filing fee by

collecting monthly payments from plaintiff's prison trust account in an amount equal to twenty

percent (20%) of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's trust account and

forwarding payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The payments shall be clearly identified by

the name and number assigned to this action. 

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of

plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit on Director, California Department of Corrections,

1515 S Street, Sacramento, California 95814.

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial

Department of the court.

DATED: December 6, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

gree1983.cdc

Case 2:04-cv-01983-FCD-KJM Document 9 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 2
446 A.2d 674

#### Harper, Appellant v. White.

Argued May 13, 1981.

Robert S. Gordon, for appellant; James G. Haggerty, for appellee.

Before MONTEMURO, HOFFMAN and VAN der VOORT, JJ.

Order opening default judgment affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID RAY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2559 LKK KJM P

vs.

CSP SOLANO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s January 13, 2006 motion for the

appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02559-LKK -KJM Document 38 Filed 04/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s January 13, 2006 motion

for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: April 20, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1/mp

will2559.31

Case 2:04-cv-02559-LKK -KJM Document 38 Filed 04/21/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 7

CERTIFICATION

pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Sun Life Financial Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his respective knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                      |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: February 16, 2012 |  |  |  |                                                      |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ Dean A. Connor                                 |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | Dean Connor                                          |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: February 16, 2012 |  |  |  |                                                      |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | /S/ Colm J. Freyne                                 |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | Colm J. Freyne                                       |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

This certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed to have been, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Periodic Financial Reports**

 

I, John T. Drexler, Vice President of Arch Western Resources, LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)   information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Arch Western Resources, LLC.

 
|   | **/s/**John T. Drexler                                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | John T. Drexler                                             |
|   | Vice President                                              |
|   |       Date: May 16, 2011 |

 

----
No. 54079.

#### L. Greenberg & Son, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 149088-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 5 

77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD 

CH ICAGO, IL 60604-3590 

Laurel L. Kroack 

Chief 

Bureau of Air 

JAN 0 9 2013 

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 

1 021 North Grand A venue, East 

Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276 

REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF: 

This letter is in response to your December 31, 2012, revision to the Illinois state implementation 

plan (SIP). The revision which was submitted to address the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 

l lO(a)(l) and (2) infrastructure SIP elements, which are necessary for the implementation, 

maintenance, and enforcement of the 2010 N02 and 2010 S02 national ambient air quality 

standards. Specifically, the SIP revision is intended to address the requirements of CAA section 

110(a)(2)(A) - section 110(a)(2)(M), with the exception of section 110(a)(2)(1), which is not part 

of the infrastructure SIP process. EPA has determined that the submission is complete for each 

ofthese elements, except for narrow portions relating to the prevention of significant 

deterioration (PSD). Illinois did not submit a complete SIP to address section 110(a)(2)(C) and 

(J) relating to PSD permitting programs required by part C of title I ofthe CAA. Illinois also did 

not submit a complete SIP to address section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) relating to interference with 

other states' PSD permitting programs required by part C by sources in Illinois. Illinois also 

failed to submit a complete SIP to address section 11 O(a)(2)(D)(ii) relating to notification to 

other states. However, the applicable PSD requirements contained in sections 110(a)(2)(C), 

(D)(i)(ll), (D)(ii), and (J) are already addressed for Illinois, as EPA has delegated authority to the state to administer the Federally promulgated PSD regulations contained in 40 C.F.R. 52.21. 

A finding of completeness merely indicates that the submission meets the criteria that any plan 

must satisfy for EPA to take rulemaking action on it. A completeness finding is not a fmding on 

the merits ofthe plan or whether it meets EPA's SIP approval requirements. 

If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me, or Andy Chang, of 

my staff, at 312-886-0258. Si

4
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIE SAFFORD, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3785 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 14, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
FILED

June 26, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE 

 MAY 1998 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

)

Appellee, ) No. 03C01-9708-CR-00330

 )

) Sullivan County

v. ) 

) Honorable Phyllis H. Miller, Judge 

)

LULA J. FLANIGAN, ) (Aggravated Kidnapping and

) Aggravated Assault)

Appellant. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the majority opinion. I add, though, that I do not believe we

have to conduct the two-prong inquiry provided in State v. Anthony, 817 S.W.2d 299

(Tenn. 1991) and State v. Dixon, 957 S.W.2d 532 (Tenn. 1997). This is because an

aggravated assault does not necessarily include the elements of kidnapping. Thus, I

believe that an Anthony issue is not even implicated. 

____________________________

Joseph M. Tipton, Judge
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1703-1704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

A-583-833
A-580-839


Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From Taiwan and the Republic of 
Korea: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the 2005-2006 
Administrative Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

[[Page 1704]]


EFFECTIVE DATE: January 16, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Devta Ohri or Andrew McAllister, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone (202) 482-3853 
or (202) 482-1174, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Statutory Time Limits

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''), requires the Department of Commerce (``Department'') to issue 
the preliminary results of an administrative review within 245 days 
after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a 
review is requested and a final determination within 120 days after the 
date on which the preliminary results are published. If it is not 
practicable to complete the review within the time period, section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend these deadlines 
to a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, respectively.

Background

    On July 3, 2006, the Department published a notice of initiation of 
administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on certain 
polyester staple fiber (``PSF'') from Taiwan and the Republic of Korea 
(``Korea''), covering the period May 1, 2005, through April 30, 2006. 
See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews, 71 FR 37892 (July 3, 2006). The preliminary results for these 
reviews are currently due no later than January 31, 2007.

Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results

    The Department requires additional time to review and analyze 
respondents' sales and cost information and to issue supplemental 
questionnaires. Thus, it is not practicable to complete these reviews 
within the previously established time limit (i.e., by January 31, 
2007). Therefore, the Department is extending the time limit for 
completion of these preliminary results by 120 days to not later than 
May 31, 2007, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: January 9, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-456 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 50 (Thursday, March 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4673]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-050-1020-MJ; HAG7-0083]


 Notice of Public Meetings--John Day/Snake Resource Advisory 
Council (RAC)

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Prineville District, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the Department of the 
Interior, BLM John Day Snake RAC will meet as indicated below:
    The John Day/Snake RAC is scheduled to meet on April 3, 2007, at 
the Oxford Suites at 2400 S.W. Court Place, Pendleton, OR 97801. The 
meeting time will be from approximately 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. A public 
comment period will begin at 1 p.m., and end at 1:15 p.m. (Pacific 
Standard Time). The meeting may include such topics as off-highway 
vehicle and travel management, noxious weeds, planning, Sage grouse, 
and other matters as may reasonably come before the council.
    Meeting Procedures: The meeting is open to the public. The public 
may present written comments to the RAC. Depending on the number of 
persons wishing to provide oral comments and agenda topics to be 
covered, the time to do so may be limited. Individuals who plan to 
attend and need special assistance such as sign language 
interpretation, tour transportation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact the BLM representative indicated below. For a copy of 
the information to be distributed to the RAC members, please submit a 
written request to the BLM Prineville District Office 10 days prior to 
the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information concerning the 
John Day/Snake RAC may be obtained from Virginia Gibbons, BLM Public 
Affairs Specialist, Prineville District Office, 3050 N.E. Third Street, 
Prineville, Oregon 97754, (541) 416-6647 or e-mail Virginia 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fc8e6edede0e1fccfe0fda1ede3e2a1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80c7e9e2e2efeef3c0eff2aee2ecedaee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 7, 2007.
Stephen R. Robertson,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. E7-4673 Filed 3-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2008207EN.01001601.xml

| 14.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/16

---

Corrigendum to the information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to national regional investment aid

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 180 of 2 August 2007
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 180 of 2 August 2007

(2008/C 207/12)

On page 12, aid No XR 102/07, under ‘Annual budget’:

for:

‘RON 20 000 million’,

read:

‘RON 20 million’;

on page 13, aid No XR 103/07, under ‘Annual budget’:

for:

‘RON 16 000 million’,

read:

‘RON 16 million’;

on page 14:

| — | aid No XR 104/07, under ‘Annual budget’: |
| --- | --- |

—

aid No XR 104/07, under ‘Annual budget’:

for:

‘RON 3 000 million’,

read:

‘RON 3 million’;

| — | aid No XR 105/07, under ‘Annual budget’: |
| --- | --- |

—

aid No XR 105/07, under ‘Annual budget’:

for:

‘RON 3 200 million’,

read:

‘RON 3,2 million’.

---