alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of IceWEB, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A, Amendment No. 2, for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John R. Signorello, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. 
       The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2. 
       The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.





February
      10, 2011
              /s/ John R. SignorelloJohn
      R. Signorello, Chief Executive Officer and
                principal
      executive officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN HACKETT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2088 FCD PAN P

vs.

D. KIMBRELL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil

rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On May 5, 2006, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Changed Pleading” in which

plaintiff requests the court to remove exhibits A through C of his original complaint and exhibits

B and C from his first amended complaint and to attach them to his second-amended complaint.

Local Rule 15-220 states that a party may obtain the court’s permission “for the

removal of any exhibit or exhibits attached to prior pleadings, in order that the same may be

attached to the changed pleading.” 

Plaintiff has not filed a second-amended complaint. When he files a second

amended complaint, plaintiff may request that the court remove attachments from prior pleadings

and attach them to the second-amended complaint.

Case 2:04-cv-02088-FCD-EFB Document 33 Filed 05/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s May 5, 2006, request to

change pleading is denied without prejudice. 

DATED: May 17, 2006.

\004

\hack2088.dny request

Case 2:04-cv-02088-FCD-EFB Document 33 Filed 05/18/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID RAY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2559 LKK KJM P

vs.

CSP SOLANO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed three discovery requests. Plaintiff is informed that neither

discovery requests served on an opposing party nor that party's responses should be filed until

such time as a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the court based

on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties shall not be

filed with the court unless, and until, they are at issue. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s March 10, 2006 “Motion

to Request Interrogatories;” March 10, 2006 “Motion for Request for Admissions” and March

14, 2006 “Motion for Request for Production of Documents” be placed in the court’s file and

disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as 

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02559-LKK -KJM Document 39 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

DATED: May 1, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1/mp

will2559.411(2)

Case 2:04-cv-02559-LKK -KJM Document 39 Filed 05/02/06 Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE LUIS CARDONA ALVAREZ,

Petitioner,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 20

- 72754 Agency No. A206

- 262

- 875

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 8, 2021 * *
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Jose Luis Cardona Alvarez , a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order declining to remand
and dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Conven tion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 16 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 72754

Against Torture (“CAT”) , and denying a motion to terminate . We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the peti tion for review. In his opening brief, Cardona Alvarez does not challenge the agency’s dispositive determination that his asylum application was untimely and he failed to establish an exception to the one

- year deadline. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, Cardona Alvarez ’s asylum claim fails. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Cardona
Alvarez failed to establish that the harm he experienced or fears in Guatemala was
or would be on account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”); see also Ayala v. Holder , 640 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 2011) (even if membership in a particular social group is established, an applicant must still show that “persecution was or will be on account of his membership in such group”). Thus, Cardona Alvarez’s withholding of removal claim fail s
. Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because
Cardona Alvarez failed to show it is more likely than not he wou ld be tortured by3 20

- 72754

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Guatemala

. See Aden v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009)

. In his opening brief, Cardona Alvarez does not raise any argument challeng ing, and therefore waives, the agency’s d enial of his motion to terminate
and the BIA’s determination that remand related to cancellation of removal was
not warranted

. See Lopez

- Vasquez , 706 F.3d at 1079

- 80. The temporary stay of removal remains in place until iss uance of the
mandate. The motion for a stay of removal is otherwise denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015 (the Report) of TICC Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Patrick F. ConroyName: Patrick F. Conroy Date: May 11, 2015
# C_2007109EN.01002701.xml

| 15.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/27

---

Notice inviting applications for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in part-block Q13b of the Dutch continental shelf

(2007/C 109/14)

The Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in part-block Q13b as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).

(Mijnbouwregeling)

(Staatscourant)

With reference to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (1) and the publication required by Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit an application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in part-block Q13b.

1

(Mijnbouwwet)

(Staatsblad)

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to the Minister for Economic Affairs, for the attention of the Director for the Energy Market, Bezuidenhoutseweg 30, The Hague, Netherlands, and marked ‘personal’. Applications submitted after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

Official Journal of the European Union

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than twelve months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained from the following telephone number: (31-70) 379 72 98.

---

(1)  OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 3.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4656 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 681
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4656

                          [Report No. 118-278]

 To amend title 5, United States Code, concerning restrictions on the 
   participation of certain Federal employees in partisan political 
                   activity, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 10, 2024

  Mr. Grassley (for himself and Mr. Peters) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                            December 9, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, concerning restrictions on the 
   participation of certain Federal employees in partisan political 
                   activity, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTIONS ON PARTISAN POLITICAL ACTIVITY.

    Section 7323(b)(2)(B)(i) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subclause (XIII), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in subclause (XIV), by striking ``or'' at the end; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(XV) any Office of Inspector General established 
                under chapter 4; or
                    ``(XVI) any Office of Special Inspector General; 
                or''.
                                                       Calendar No. 681

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4656

                          [Report No. 118-278]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend title 5, United States Code, concerning restrictions on the 
   participation of certain Federal employees in partisan political 
                   activity, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 9, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Denise J. McNamara, Appellant, v County of Monroe et al., Respondents.

[634 NYS2d 276]

—Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Summary judgment was properly granted to defendants dismissing the complaint. Defendants demonstrated that plaintiffs application for the position of Monroe County Deputy Sheriff Jailer was rejected because plaintiff has a hearing loss in her right ear of more than 70 decibels, which exceeds the standards for hearing acuity set by the Municipal Police Training Council (MPTC). The hearing acuity standards promulgated by the MPTC *(see,*9 NYCRR 6000.3 [e]) are neither arbitrary nor capricious and bear a rational relationship to the duties that persons in the law enforcement field are required to perform *(see, McCarthy v Nassau County,*208 AD2d 810, 811; *Matter of Rice v Schuyler County Civ. Serv. Commn.,*183 AD2d 974, *lv*
      *997
      *denied*80 NY2d 760; *Pascal v County of Orange,*104 AD2d 865). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J. —Dismiss Complaint.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 51 (Friday, March 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4801]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (07-024)]


U.S. Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Advisory 
Board Charter; Notice of Amendment and Renewal

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of Amendment and Renewal of the Charter for the U.S. 
Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Advisory Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The title of the current U.S. Space-Based Positioning, 
Navigation and Timing Advisory Board Charter is being amended to be in 
compliance with Public Law 109-364, Section 911(a)(3), signed into law 
by the President on October 17, 2006. The only change is to amend 
``U.S.'' to ``National'' in the title.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. P. Diane Rausch, Advisory 
Committee Management Officer, Office of External Relations, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-
4510.

    Dated: March 9, 2007.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-4801 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND
AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>         0001098009
<NAME> SPACE LAUNCHES FINANCINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                107,420
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,420
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       61
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,420
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,892
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,892
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,892
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 8.1



MAIN SUBSIDIARIES OF TERRA NETWORKS, S.A. AT DECEMBER 31, 2002



|Company                                            |  | Country of Incorporation
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Lycos Inc.                                         |  | United States           
|                                                   | 
|Lycos Europe                                       |  | Netherlands             
|Terra Networks Usa Llc                             |  | United States           
|Wired                                              |  | United States           
|Get Relevant                                       |  | United States           
|Tripod Pty Ltd.                                    |  | United States           
|Lycos Asia Ltd                                     |  | United States           
|                                                   | 
|Terra Networks Latam, S.L.                         |  | Spain                   
|                                                   | 
|Terra Networks Argentina, S.A.                     |  | Argentina               
|Terra Networks Chile, S.A.                         |  | Chile                   
|Terra Networks México S.A. de C.V.                 |  | Mexico                  
|Terra Networks Brasil, S.A.                        |  | Brazil                  
|Terra Networks Colombia, S.A.                      |  | Colombia                
|Terra Networks Perú, S.A.                          |  | Peru                    
|Terra Networks Guatemala, S.A.                     |  | Guatemala               
|                                                   | 
|Terra Networks Asociadas, S.L.                     |  | Spain                   
|                                                   | 
|Maptel Networks, S.A.                              |  | Spain                   
|Ifigenia Plus, S.L.                                |  | Spain                   
|Educaterra, S.A.                                   |  | Spain                   
|Red Universal de Marketing y Bookings Online, S.A. |  | Spain                   
|Azeler Automoción, S.A.                            |  | Spain                   
|Uno-eBank, S.A.                                    |  | Spain                   
|Terra Mobile, S.A.                                 |  | Spain                   
|One Travelcom, Inc.                                |  | United States           
|                                                   | 
|Terra Networks España, S.A.U.                      |  | Spain                   
|                                                   | 
|Ordenamiento de Links Especializados, S.A.         |  | Spain                   
|Terra Networks México S.A. de C.V.                 |  | Mexico                  
|Terra Networks Colombia, S.A.                      |  | Colombia                
|Terra Networks Guatemala, S.A.                     |  | Guatemala
1 The Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, Unites States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3180

___________ Vaughn Lee Miller, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Andy Lee, Sheriff, Benton County; * Deputy R. D. Connor; * [UNPUBLISHED] Deputy Paul Newell, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 4, 2002 Filed: February 7, 2002

___________ Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Vaughn Lee Miller filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two Benton County deputies and the sheriff, based on injuries he allegedly received while being transported from one jail to another. The district court 1 granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, finding that Miller’s complaint alleged-2- no more than negligence and therefore did not state a section 1983 claim. Upon de novo review, see Spencer v. Knapheide Truck Equip. Co. , 183 F.3d 902, 904-05 (8th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 1157 (2000), we agree with the district court, see Williams v. Kelso , 201 F.3d 1060, 1065 (8th Cir. 2000) (to establish claim of deliberate indifference to substantial risk of serious harm, plaintiff must show more than negligence); Tlamka v. Serrell , 244 F.3d 628, 635 (8th Cir. 2001) (supervisor liability arises only if supervisor directly participates in constitutional violation, or failure to train causes constitutional deprivation). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.