alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

The Water Cycle - USGS Water Science School

LinksGlossaryHelp

      - Home
      - Water Basics
      - Water Properties
      - Water Cycle (Adults)
      - Water Cycle (Kids)
      - Surface Water
      - Groundwater
      - Water Quality
      - Water Use
      - Activities
      - Photos
      - Q&A
      - Teachers
      - Contact

 Back to previous page

Archivos para la impresión:- PDF  (838mm x 610mm - 2 Mb) 
- JPG  (432mm x 279mm - 0.4 Mb) 
- JPG  (poster - 2.5 Mb)
El Ciclo de Agua Para Niños
El Servicio Geológico de los Estados Unidos (USGS por sus siglas en inglés) y la Organización de Alimento y Agricultura de las Naciones Unidas (FAO) han colaborado en la creación de un diagrama sobre el ciclo del agua para niños de las escuelas elementales e intermedias.

Volver a:El Ciclo de Agua (English).

Para ver archivos en PDF, utilice Adobe Reader (gratuito) o algun otro software similar.

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |			U.S. Geological Survey                        	URL: http://water.usgs.gov/edu/watercycle-kids-spanish.html	Page Contact Information: Howard Perlman	Page Last Modified: Friday, 02-Dec-2016 12:52:46 EST
No. 47910.

#### Protests 21968-K, etc., of V. W. Davis (Duluth).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391) the protests claiming that no addition should have been made for planing, tonguing, and/or grooving were sustained.
No. 46703.

#### Protest 797844-G of Wm. Shaland (New York).

*418Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of whistling balloons, rubber balloons, noisemakers, and cigarette whistles composed in part of bamboo. Following Abstracts 40493 and 39509 they were held dutiable as bamboo articles at 45 percent under paragraph 409 as claimed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         In connection with the Annual Report of Syscan Imaging, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Darwin Hu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                             /s/ Darwin Hu
Date:  June 17, 2005         --------------------------------
                             Darwin Hu, Chairman and
                             Chief Executive Officer


         This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.




<PAGE>
No. 58062.

protests 163043-K, etc. (New York).

#### Melchers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “T. D. 53159 Clean Content” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ Paul A. LangPaul A. LangPresident
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Granting Defendants’ Request for an Extension of Time

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL DAVID WHITE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al,

Defendants.

CIV-S-04-2276 GEB GGH P

ORDER

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

REQUEST FOR AN 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

Good cause appearing, Defendants Hough and Adams are granted a 35 day extension

to file a responsive pleading. Defendants’ responsive pleading shall be due on or before January

8, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: 12/12/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

__________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

wh2276.eot(3)

Case 2:04-cv-02276-GEB-GGH Document 63 Filed 12/12/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MedAssets, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ L. Neil Hunn
L. Neil Hunn
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Carbon Market Research

RGGI, you’ve broken through the Cost Containment 

Reserve price! Now what?

17 Mar 2014 21:20

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative’s 23rd auction on March 5 saw a run on allowances that cleared at a record 

high $4/st, a level when the Cost Containment Reserve allowances are released for sale. Compliance buyers 

scooped up all 18.4 million allowances offered for sale, and the additional five million Cost Containment Reserve 

allowances allocated for 2014. This will likely make the market more responsive to fundamentals for the remainder 

of the year.

Do you want to read more?

No access

Read more...

RGGI, you’ve broken through the Cost Containment Reserve price! Now what? - Overvie... Page 1 of 1

http://www.pointcarbon.com/research/promo/research/1.4523252?&ref=searchlist 5/29/2014
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4384 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 to provide for 

environmental infrastructure in Columbus, Henry, and Clayton Counties, 

Georgia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2024 

Mr. OSSOFF introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 

to provide for environmental infrastructure in Columbus, 

Henry, and Clayton Counties, Georgia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Georgia Stormwater 

5 Management Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4384 IS

1 SEC. 2. COLUMBUS, HENRY, AND CLAYTON COUNTIES, 

2 GEORGIA. 

3 Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development 

4 Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 

5 3808) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(406) COLUMBUS, HENRY, AND CLAYTON

7 COUNTIES, GEORGIA.—$10,000,000 for environ8 mental infrastructure, including water and waste9 water infrastructure (including stormwater manage10 ment), Columbus, Henry, and Clayton Counties, 

11 Georgia.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sitestar Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Erhartic, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Frank Erhartic, Jr.

Frank Erhartic, Jr.,

Chief Executive Officer, President,

and Chief Financial Officer



Dated:  September 18, 2003
Exhibit 31.01

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14

         I, Jason McDiarmid, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Essential Innovations Technology
Corp.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 13, 2005


/s/ Jason McDiarmid
----------------------------
Jason McDiarmid
Principal Executive Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130985 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130985 COA: 258579 Wayne CC: 04-003502-02 JUAN D. BULLOCK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 14, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHANGO JAJA GREER, SR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2505 FCD DAD P

vs.

JODI B. RAFKIN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 7, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02505-FCD-DAD Document 5 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 7, 2005, are adopted in

full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110 (E.D. Cal.

1997); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED:January 3, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02505-FCD-DAD Document 5 Filed 01/04/06 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00845

- CV

Sandra JENNINGS

, Appellant

v.

Robert SCOTT , Commissioner of Education, and Boerne Independent School District,

Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- 530

Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date , the judgment of the trial

court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Appellees, Robert Scott, Commissioner of Education,

and Boerne Independent School District, recover their costs of appeal from Appellant Sandra

Jennings.

SIGNED January 8, 2014.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
#### HENRY M. STEARNS, Appellant, *v.*CHARLES L. ALLEN and Others, Respondents.

*Note given by trustees*— *when they are not liable upon it individually.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, entered upon a verdict directed at the circuit.

The action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants, personally, on a promissory note, of which the following is a copy: “ $125.00.

“ On or before the 1st day of April, 1876, we promise to pay, *as trustees of Corinth Lodge*No. 683, F. and A. M., to D. Y. Sturdevan or bearer one hundred and twenty-five dollars, with interest payable annually. Note payable at N. W. Buckmaster’s store when due.

*“April*25, 1871.

“CHAS. L. ALLEN.

“N. W. BUCKMASTER.

“M. OWENS.”

The defendants in their answer set up the tact that the note in question was given by them as duly elected and acting trustees of Corinth Lodge No. 683 of Free and Accepted Masons, a corporation duly organized and empowered to transact such business, and that *559the}', as such trustees and officers, were duly authorized by the lodge to give said promissory note, and that the same was given for a debt of said lodge and accepted as its obligation, and that they received no part of the proceeds thereof and denied their liability thereon.

Upon the trial the defendants were allowed, against the plaintiffs objection and exception, to prove the facts so set up. The court thereupon directed a verdict in their favor.

The court at General Term said: “As I understand this case it presents the precise question considered and determined in *Hood*v. *Hollenbeck*(7 Hun, 362). The question was examined by me in that case with great care on the authorities, and I can only add that a reexamination of them confirms me in the conclusions there reached and declared. The question in very nearly the same form was again under examination in *Whitford*v. *Laidler,*
      ***
      **decided at the last General Term in this department, where in a dissenting opinion I repeated to some extent my own views of the law on the point here before us for discussion, which views are in entire harmony with those expressed in *Hood*v. *Hollenbeck.*For myself I am satisfied that the latter case was well decided, as the law is settled by numerous decisions in this State. In *Whitford*v. *LctMler*I took occasion to say that the decisions in some of our sister States were not, as I thought, in harmony with those of our own State. Following the decision in *Hood*v. Hollenbeck, and the many decisions referred to in the opinion in that case, die judgment here ordered should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.”

*A.*Pond, for the appellant.

*J. W.*Houghton, for the respondents.

*Ante,*page 136.

Opinion by

Bookes, J.

Learned, P. J., and Boardman, J., concurred in result.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 10.5

                              Promissory Note


$2346.00                                                      June 14, 2002
                                                          Newport Beach, CA


     On Demand for value received the undersigned promises to pay in lawful
money of the United States of America to the order of Mezzanine Fund
Management, Ltd., nominee or assignee, the sum of Two Thousand Three
Hundred Forty Six Dollars ($2346.00), with interest from June 14, 2002
until paid at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum).

     Should interest not be paid, it shall thereafter bear interest as the
principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an
amount equal to simple interest on the principal at the maximum rate
permitted by law.  The undersigned hereby waives presentment of payment,
protest, notice of protest, notice of nonpayment, and diligence in bringing
suit, and further agrees, in case suit is instituted, to collect this
Promissory Note or any portion thereof, to pay such additional sum for
attorneys' fees as the Court may adjudge reasonable in such suit.



                                   Mezzanine Investment Corporation


                                   By: /s/ Eric Chess Bronk
                                   __________________________________
                                   Eric Chess Bronk, President
# C_2007178EN.01002401.xml

| 31.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/24

---

CORRIGENDA

Corrigendum to Special Report No 2/2007 concerning the Institutions' expenditure on buildings together with the Institutions' replies

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 148 of 2 July 2007
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 148 of 2 July 2007

(2007/C 178/02)

On page 11, footnote 31:

for:

for:

‘Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Commission of 19 March 2001 (OJ L 114, 24.4.2001, p. 1)’,

read:

read:

‘Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 (OJ L 114, 24.4.2001, p. 1)’;

on page 11, footnote 32:

for:

for:

‘of the European Parliament and the Council’,

read:

read:

‘of the European Parliament and of the Council’.

---
No. 63124.

#### F. C. Mackay *v.*United States,

protests 239921-K, 239923-K, and 239924-K (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fresh or frozen boneless pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 59714, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.