alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ John T. DrexlerJohn T. DrexlerVice President
Date: November 15, 2010
DuPont Chemicals & Fluoroproducts 

Chestnut Run Plaza 702 1276-E 

4417 Lancaster Pike 

Wilmington, DE 19805 

USA 

Chestnut Run Plaza 702/1276-E, Wilmington, DE 19805

DuPont Chemicals & Fluoroproducts

CONTAINS CLEAN AIR ACT CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

March 28, 2012 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air and Radiation 

Stratospheric Protection Division 

Attention: Melissa Fiffer 

1310 L Street NW, 10th Floor (Room 1029) 

Washington, DC 20005 

Dear Ms Fiffer: 

Reference: DuPont SNAP Information Notice 

 (Z)-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-but-2-ene (CAS RN 692-49-9) 

[Report DuPont-17453-785-1] 

Please see the attached letter and toxicity studies (on the enclosed CD) submitted for PMN P-11-

0549 for the EPA. 

 

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

 Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

 Confidential Business Information Center (CBIC) – TS7407M 

Attention: Audrey Binder 

 EPA East Building, Room 6428 

 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

 Washington, DC 20004-3302 

Please contact me if you have any questions about this submission or need further clarification. 

Sincerely, 

 

[Helen Walter-Terrinoni 

Global Marketing Manager 

Telephone: 302-999-2442 

Email: helen.a.walter-terrinoni@usa.dupont.com] 

Via Federal Express
No. 51750

#### Protest 116173-K of Casa Tula (Dallas).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

An examination of the official papers revealed that the protest was not filed within the statutory period of 60 days after the date of liquidation, as required by section 514, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed_ § 1514). The protest was therefore dismissed.
(Reap. Dec. 10462)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1414.

(Decided March 5, 1963)

*Broohs & Broohs*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement for decision upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the bicycle tires, imported from Holland, here involved, and that such values were the invoiced unit prices.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

BNFY 673627v1 1 (CIV-S-04-2534 LKK DAD) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT MICHAEL CROW 

Alan J. Kessel (Cal. Bar No.: 130707) 

Suzanne M. Burke (Cal. Bar No.: 188597) 

Brandon Q. Tran (Cal. Bar No.: 223435) 

BUCHALTER NEMER 

A Professional Corporation 

18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 800 

Irvine, California 92612-0514 

Telephone:(949) 760-1121 

Facsimile: (949) 720-0182 

E-mail: btran@buchalter.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff DIRECTV, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

DIRECTV, INC., a California corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MICHAEL CROW, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: CIV-S-04-2534 LKK DAD 

Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton 

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT 

MICHAEL CROW 

Having read the Request for Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant MICHAEL CROW 

filed herein by Plaintiff DIRECTV, Inc., and such other pleadings and papers deemed appropriate 

by the Court, and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefore, the Court ORDERS as follows: 

1. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as against Defendant 

MICHAEL CROW; and 

2. Each party shall bear its/his own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this action to 

date. 

DATED: October 7, 2005 

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton 

United States District Court 

Eastern District of California 

Case 2:04-cv-02534-LKK -DAD Document 26 Filed 10/07/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT TO 
ALLIANCE AGREEMENT 




THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of October 10, 2016.


BY AND BETWEEN


		
	(1)
	POSCO Energy Co., Ltd., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Korea, having its principal place of business at POSCO Center, 440 Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-777, Korea (“POSCO Energy”); and 




		
	(2)
	FuelCell Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation having a principal place of business at 3 Great Pasture Rd., Danbury, CT 06810, U.S.A. (“FCE”). 




POSCO Energy and FCE are sometimes referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”    


RECITALS


WHEREAS, POSCO Energy and FCE are parties to a series of technology transfer agreements identified as follows:


		
	(a)
	the Alliance Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2007 (the “AA”);


		
	(b)
	the Technology Transfer, Distribution and Licensing Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2007, (the “TTA”);  


		
	(c)
	the Stack Technology Transfer and License Agreement dated October 27, 2009 (the “STTA”); and


		
	(d)
	the Cell Technology Transfer and License Agreement dated October 31, 2012 (the “CTTA”);  


all as amended, and among other agreements; and


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Term of the AA, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual promises made herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Section 5.1 of Article V of the AA is replaced in its entirety by the following:




SECTION 5.1  Term.  The initial term of this Agreement (the “Initial Term”) shall commence on the Effective Date and shall expire, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions set forth herein, on October 31, 2027.


Except as set forth in this Amendment, the AA is unaffected and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.  

























IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date and year written below.


	
					
	POSCO Energy Co., Ltd.
	 
	 
	FuelCell Energy, Inc.
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:  /s/ Tong-Wood Shim
	 
	 
	By:  /s/ Michael S. Bishop
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Name: Tong-Wook Shim
	 
	 
	Name: Michael S. Bishop
	 

	Title: Executive Vice President,
	 
	 
	Title: Senior Vice President,
	 

	         Chief Financial Officer    
	 
	 
	         Chief Financial Officer
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Date:    October 10, 2016
	 
	 
	Date:  October 13, 2016
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00201-CV

CENTURY SPORTS WEARS, INC. D/B/A 

WYNFORD WHOLESALE, PERVEZ 

DAREDIA, AND ASHRAF DAREDIA,

Appellants

V.

WALLIS BANK F/K/A WALLIS STATE 

BANK, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 362nd District Court

of Denton County (19-3906-362)

April 29, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellants Century Sports Wears, Inc. d/b/a 

Wynford Wholesale, Pervez Daredia, and Ashraf Daredia shall pay all of the costs of 

this appeal, for which let execution issue.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
Order filed May 13, 2021 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-21-00205-CV

____________

IN RE K.P., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-22874

ORDER

On April 20, 2021, relator K.P. filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking 

this court to compel the Honorable Sandra Peake, presiding judge of the 257th

District Court in Harris County, Texas, to set aside her April 19, 2021 orders for 

application of Indian passports for the children.

Relator’s appendix and supplemental appendix include documents, which 

contain unredacted sensitive information such as the names and birthdates of the 

minor children. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.9(a)(3). Parties are required to redact all 

sensitive information in documents filed in this court unless the inclusion of the 

sensitive data is specifically required by a statute, court rule, or administrative 

regulation. Id. 9.9(b). There is no statute, court rule, or administrative regulation 

requiring the inclusion of sensitive data.
Accordingly, we ORDER relator to redact all sensitive information from her 

appendix and supplement appendix and refile them in this court on or before May 

17, 2021. Failure to comply with this order will result in the denial of relator’s 

petition. 

We further request that real party in interest file a response to the petition on 

or before June 1, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Hassan.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MedAssets, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
# Table 22. TEs in water

Table 22	&P
EXHIBIT 10.22

 

PCM, Inc.

Summary of Executive Salary and Bonus Arrangements

 

The table below summarizes the current annual salary and bonus arrangements we have with each of our current executive officers. All of the compensation arrangements we have with our executive officers, including with respect to annual salaries and bonuses, are reviewed and may be modified from time to time by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors.

 

We have written employment arrangements with each of our executive officers, and a copy of each such employment arrangement is filed as an exhibit to the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K. The non-salary and bonus components of our compensation arrangements with our executive officers, including with respect to severance, option grants and other benefits, are described in those respective agreements. Our executive officers participate in executive bonus plans during fiscal year 2015 established by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors and adopted by our Board of Directors.

 

	
Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
Annual
   Base Salary
    	
 
    	
Bonus
    	
 
    
	
Frank F. Khulusi
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
583,000
    	
 
    	
 
    	
(1)
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Robert J. Miley
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
President
    	
 
    	
$
    	
400,000
    	
 
    	
 
    	
(1)
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Brandon H. LaVerne
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Chief   Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary
    	
 
    	
$
    	
346,330
    	
 
    	
 
    	
(1)
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Robert I. Newton
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and   Secretary
    	
 
    	
$
    	
342,900
    	
 
    	
 
    	
(1)
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Simon M. Abuyounes
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Executive Vice President — IT, Operations and   Commercial Sales
    	
 
    	
$
    	
333,375
    	
 
    	
 
    	
(1)
    



 






(1)  All executives are eligible to participate in our executive bonus plans referenced above.
Comiskey
								& Company
March 17,2006

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

Re: American Development & Investment Fund, Inc.
    (fka MNS Eagle Equity Group, Inc.)

Ladies and Gentleman,

We were previously the principal accountants for MNS Eagle Equity Group, Inc.
(the "Company") and have issued our report dated January 30, 2006 on the
audited financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and 2004.
We have read and agree with the statements contained in Item 9 to Form 10-K
of American Development & Investment Fund, Inc. regarding changes in and
disagreements with its principal accountants.


January 30, 2006                              /s/ Comiskey & Company
Denver, Colorado 					  ---------------------------
                                             Professional Corporation
















                    Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
                  789 Sherman Street-Suite 385. Denver, CO 80203
      (303) 830-2255 Fax (303) 830-0876 info at comiskey.com. www.comiskey.com
0FFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN"(h) Any pwson, firm, or corgarEt.t;iMi,

Wk~0 Shdl hid hI~~al2 Or itSeY out as a school to teach ane train o'ther ptrsors in the art, bueinesa,or traet3 or halrCreaslng cjr cot3iuet.010~ for remnarotion or pay, as ymvlded **in thiits**  **Ad, IS**  **hereby** deolared **to be**  a beauty oulturesohool,and subject to the provlaiam and reatriotloam **oontalned** in thla Mt.* Subeeotlcm (b) of aedtieii S la dsolarat&e of &at wmtltutes a mahooloi bsauty oulture. If the pErtl68that yvursfertoshall ohergsany fee to the parsonnenrolledin eald 6ohooltor ths tra.Ullngtbatthey ssoureJthsnha,1s~ think that uudsr se&la 1 mad under the berinitiao or auoh a sohoolglwm kr ssatiozrs, subswtlon (b), tbsy must sooursa oartiiioate ofreglntration **end** shallbe uadsr ths &rladiot&da **of** your~dspukpant~ If ths faOt8 dl8OlOss that th0~0~3~~j00tt0th0 t0mi00rthti **Aot, #a**  **think that**  **ths appllasnt**  **ir re@hwl**  by lsm artlals734b,ssotionll,topaJamhundrad dollarsior thu aartiii.eate o$ registration aa nsohoolotbsautyoultun.

sd It le our oplnicmthe if thsa~y~~p+ sohaol o&argssa fae or any rthe tsaehlngand training of par8onS in the art afhalrereaslry

and oasmstoli&y,

they are subisat to the terms ot art1ol.e 734b end mtmt pay cae mndred doll?crs

for a sartifioateof reglstratlcm rraayour department.
Youra Tery uul.y
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT JOHNSON,

NO. CIV. S-04-2671 LKK/PAN

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

ESTHER DE LA TORRE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

A Status Conference was SET for April 25, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. 

in the above-captioned case. However, as recently as April 15,

2005, plaintiff amended his complaint. In order to give

plaintiff sufficient time to serve the amended complaint and to

allow defendants to appear, the Status Conference set for April

25, 2005 is CONTINUED to July 18, 2005 at 3:00 p.m. 

////

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-02671-LKK -EFB Document 15 Filed 04/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on defendants

concurrently with service of process or where service was

effected.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 28, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02671-LKK -EFB Document 15 Filed 04/29/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 58071.

protests 161290-K, etc. (New York).

#### Fontana Hollywood Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Eicwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fontana Hollywood Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 1503), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGG MICHAEL REITAN, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2746 FCD GGH P

vs.

D. RUNNELS, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has

filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

General Order No. 262.

On April 19, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings

and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and

which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

On June 10, 2005, petitioner was granted an additional thirty

Case 2:04-cv-02746-FCD-GGH Document 15 Filed 07/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days to file his objections. Petitioner has filed objections to

the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 19,

2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed.

DATED:July 5, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02746-FCD-GGH Document 15 Filed 07/06/05 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4886 

To amend the American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Culture 

and Art Development Act to modify the program for Native Hawaiian 

and Alaska Native culture and arts development, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2024 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself, Ms. HIRONO, and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native 

Hawaiian Culture and Art Development Act to modify 

the program for Native Hawaiian and Alaska Native 

culture and arts development, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native Arts and Cul5 ture Promotion Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4886 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO AMERICAN INDIAN, ALASKA NA2 TIVE, AND NATIVE HAWAIIAN CULTURE AND 

3 ART DEVELOPMENT ACT. 

4 Section 1521 of the American Indian, Alaska Native, 

5 and Native Hawaiian Culture and Art Development Act 

6 (20 U.S.C. 4441) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding 

8 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘private,’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (c)— 

10 (A) by striking paragraph (2) and insert11 ing the following: 

12 ‘‘(2) For any grants made with respect to Na13 tive Hawaiian art and culture, the members of the 

14 governing board which is required to be established 

15 under paragraph (1) shall— 

16 ‘‘(A) include Native Hawaiians and indi17 viduals widely recognized in the field of Native 

18 Hawaiian art and culture; and 

19 ‘‘(B) serve for a fixed term.’’; and 

20 (B) in paragraph (3)— 

21 (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

22 the comma at the end and inserting ‘‘; 

23 and’’; 

24 (ii) by striking subparagraph (B); and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4886 IS

1 (iii) by redesignating subparagraph 

2 (C) as subparagraph (B). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Annemarie L. Tanella, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 433]

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 6, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked as an assistant manager in the billing department of a medical office. Claimant left her employment after her new supervisor refused to schedule her work hours to accommodate her school schedule. The Board denied claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. We find that this decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record. There is no dispute that the reason claimant left her job was because her new supervisor refused to allow her to work hours which accommodated her school schedule. Because this is not a justifiable reason for claimant to have left her employment, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.