alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
12.31.14 Exhibit 10.25 LTIP Award






Exhibit 10.25


ROSETTA STONE INC. 2009 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
2013 ROSETTA STONE INC. LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PROGRAM
AWARD AGREEMENT
Rosetta Stone Inc. (the “Company”) hereby grants you the eligibility to receive cash and shares of the Company’s Stock, subject to certain restrictions and the achievement of certain performance goals as described herein (“Performance Stock Awards”), through the Rosetta Stone Inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and the 2013 Rosetta Stone Inc. Long-Term Incentive Program (the “LTIP”).  Except as provided herein, all terms and definitions of the Plan and LTIP are incorporated herein by reference.
Executive (“you”):    [Participant’s Name]
The Company will award you the following Performance Stock Awards and cash payment upon the achievement of the Performance Goals in accordance with the terms and conditions of the LTIP and as specified as below:
[Participant’s Detailed Chart Added Here - Includes Target, Minimum and Maximum Potential Payouts]
Cash Payment Date: Any cash payment under this Award will be made to you within 45 days after the end of the Program Period, subject to the achievement of the Performance Goals as determined by the Committee and the terms and conditions of the LTIP. 
Granting of Performance Stock Awards: The Company shall grant to you Performance Stock Awards as described in the table above within 45 days after the end of the Program Period, subject to the achievement of the Performance Goals as determined by the Committee and the terms and conditions of the LTIP.  If granted, the shares of Performance Stock Awards will be 100% vested as of the date of grant.
Condition of Stockholder Approval.  Before any payment of cash or the granting of Performance Stock Awards pursuant to this Award can be made, the material terms of the Performance Goals(s) must be disclosed to, and subsequently approved by, the Company’s stockholders in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.162-27(e)(4).  If the Company’s stockholders have not (or do not, if applicable) approved the Performance Goal(s) and the terms of this LTIP prior to the end of the 2013 fiscal year, then this Award shall be null and void, and you will have no rights to any payment of cash or Performance Stock Awards pursuant to this Award.
This Award is designated as a bonus that is in addition to your regular cash wages. Participation in the Plan and LTIP is discretionary and voluntary, and the Plan and LTIP can be terminated at any time.  This Award does not create a right or entitlement to future Awards, whether pursuant to the Plan or otherwise.  This Award is subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders as described above, and if such stockholder approval is not obtained, then this Award shall be null and void.
AGREED AND CONSENTED TO:


ROSETTA STONE INC.
By:________________________________
Name: Steve Swad
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 1, 2013
                    
EXECUTIVE
By: _______________________________
Name: [Participant’s Name]









Date: ______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4851 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4851

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To adjust the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area to 
                  include the Scarper Ridge property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Scarper Ridge Golden Gate National 
Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. SCARPER RIDGE BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    Section 2(a)(2) of Public Law 92-589 (16 U.S.C. 460bb-1(a)(2)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(F) Land generally depicted as `Proposed Boundary 
                Addition' on the map entitled `Golden Gate National 
                Recreation Area Proposed Boundary Addition', numbered 
                641/193973, and dated July 2024.''.

            Passed the Senate December 19 (legislative day, December 
      16), 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4851

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To adjust the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area to 
                  include the Scarper Ridge property.
```
# C_2007171EN.01001001.xml

| 24.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/10

---

SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC HOLIDAYS FOR 2009

SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC HOLIDAYS FOR 2009

(2007/C 171/08)

| 1st January | Thursday, New Year's Day |
| --- | --- |
| 2nd January | Friday, day following New Year's Day |
| 9th April | Maundy Thursday |
| 10th April | Good Friday |
| 13th April | Easter Monday |
| 1st May | Friday, Labour Day |
| 21st May | Thursday, Ascension Day |
| 22nd May | Friday, day following Ascension Day |
| 1st June | Whit Monday |
| 21st July | Tuesday, Belgian National Holiday |
| 2nd November | Monday, All Souls' Day |
| 24th December to | Thursday | 6 days — Christmas and end of year |
| 31st December | Thursday |

1st January

st

Thursday, New Year's Day

2nd January

nd

Friday, day following New Year's Day

9th April

th

Maundy Thursday

10th April

th

Good Friday

13th April

th

Easter Monday

1st May

st

Friday, Labour Day

21st May

st

Thursday, Ascension Day

22nd May

nd

Friday, day following Ascension Day

1st June

st

Whit Monday

21st July

st

Tuesday, Belgian National Holiday

2nd November

nd

Monday, All Souls' Day

24th December to

th

Thursday

6 days — Christmas and end of year

31st December

st

Thursday

TOTAL: 17 days

The above-mentioned dates also apply to Luxembourg, except that Tuesday 21 July is replaced by Tuesday 23 June, Luxembourg National Holiday.

Work will resume as normal on Monday 4 January 2010. Without prejudice to the schedule of public holidays for 2010, Friday 1 January 2010 will be holidays.

The Commission reserves the right to modify the decisions, should the needs of service so require.

---
No. 51016.

#### Protests 112252-K, etc., of Sprague Manufacturing Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the music boxes are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Thorens Co.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 165, C. D. 965). In accordance therewith the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1541 (a), as modified by T. D. 48093, was sustained.
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 

2. Amendment 

 

to the

 

COLLABORATION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT

 

entered into as of 16 December 2013 between ACELRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, United States (“AcelRx”), and having a principal place of business at 351 Galveston Drive, Redwood City, CA 94063, United States, and GRÜNENTHAL GMBH, a company organized under the laws of Germany (“Grünenthal”), having its registered office at Zieglerstrasse 6, 52078 Aachen, Germany, as amended by the 1st Amendment effective as of July 17th, 2015 (collectively the “Agreement”).

 

	 	
1.
	
The parties have agreed to amend the Agreement as follows: 



 

	 	
a.
	
Article 3.4 shall be renewed to read as follows: 



 

“3.4     Joint Steering Committee Membership. The Joint Steering Committee shall consist of individuals appropriately qualified and of appropriate seniority to discuss the development, manufacturing, regulatory and commercialization activities of the Parties and shall be responsible for coordinating communications, managing the roles, responsibilities and timelines for such activities based on the Development Plan. The Joint Steering Committee shall be composed of six members, three of whom shall be nominated by AcelRx and three of whom shall be nominated by Grünenthal. Any member of the Joint Steering Committee may designate an appropriately qualified substitute to attend and perform the functions of that member at any meeting of the Joint Steering Committee. Each Party may, with the consent of the other Party, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, invite non-member representatives of such Party to attend meetings of the Joint Steering Committee.”

 

2.     All capitalized terms and definitions used in this Amendment shall have the same meaning as defined in the Agreement.

 

3.     All other provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged.

 

4.     This Amendment enters into force on September 20, 2016 (“2nd Amendment Effective Date”(.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party hereto has executed or caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf as of the 2nd Amendment Effective Date.

 

(Signature Page follows)

 


 

 




 


 

	
 
	
AcelRx PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By: 
	
Howard B. Rosen
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	
 
	
Name:
	
/s/ Howard B. Rosen
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	
 
	
Title:
	
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
	
 




 

	
 
	
GRÜNENTHAL GMBH
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By: 
	
Dott. Alberto Grua
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	
 
	
Name: 
	
/s/Dott. (Dr.) Alberto Grua
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	
 
	
Title:
	
CHIEF COMMERCIAL OFFICER

EU, NA AND GLOBAL OPERATIONS



Member of the Corporate

Executive Board
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	RALF RADERMACHER	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Name:	/s/ RALF RADERMACHER	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Title:	
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT

CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT 



AND LICENSING
Exhibit 13
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.
 Date: December 18, 2009/s/ Yeung Chu Kwong, WilliamName:
    
    Yeung Chu Kwong, WilliamTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer/s/ Lai Ni QuiaqueName:
    
    Lai Ni QuiaqueTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6574** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. LARRY DONNELL FRYE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00247

- HEH

- 1 ; 3:10

- cv - 00678

- HEH )

Submitted : June 26, 2014 Decided: June 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Larry Donnell Frye , Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond , Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Donnell F rye seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the court’s prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)
. When the district court denies relief on the m erits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Frye has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil ity and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument becau se the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average 
Dumping Margins in Antidumping Investigations; Change in Effective Date 
of Final Modification

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Change in Effective Date of Final Modification

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 27, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published a modification concerning the calculation of 
the weighted-average dumping margin in antidumping investigations (71 
FR 77722). The Department is delaying the effective date of the 
modification until January 23, 2007.

DATE: The effective date of the final modification, published at 71 FR 
77722 on December 27, 2006, will be January 23, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Barnett (202) 482-2866, Michael 
Rill (202) 482-3058, or William Kovatch (202) 482-5052.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 27, 2006, the Department of 
Commerce published a modification concerning the calculation of the 
weighted-average dumping margin in antidumping duty investigations (71 
FR 77722). After further consultations with Congress and in order to 
afford adequate time for review, the Department is delaying the 
effective date of the final modification until January 23, 2007. The 
methodology set forth in the Federal Register notice published at 71 FR 
77722 on December 27, 2006, will be used in implementing the findings 
of the WTO panel in US- Zeroing (EC) pursuant to section 129 of the 
URAA concerning the specific antidumping investigations challenged by 
the EC in that dispute. The Department also will apply the final 
modification in all current and future antidumping investigations as of 
the effective date.

    Dated: January 8, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-457 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510-DS-S
### InstantEye MK

- 2 GEN 3 sUAS

Communication Systems Description

The InstantEye Mk

- 2 system contains three transmitters, one on the GCS and two on the aircraft. The GCS transmits

command and control (C2) to the aircraft and the aircraft transmits both flight data and video to the GCS.

At power up, a frequency scan determines open ch annels in both the video and data bands, and these channels are used

for the duration of the flight. This scan allows up to four GCS/aircraft pairs to operate in close proximity. While operating

more than four systems in one area will not cause C2 issues, a 2 km standoff is needed to successfully receive video

without degradation.



### Vehicle Data

Transmitter Type: Digital

Modulation and Coding: OQPSK DSSS

Min Transmit Frequency: 2.4 GHz

Max Transmit Frequency: 2.48 GHz

Operational Transmit Frequency: Channeli zed with 5 MHz spacing

Peak Power to Antenna: 63 mW

Average Power to Antenna: 63 mW



### Vehicle Video

Transmitter Type: Analog

Modulation and Coding: FM, NTSC RS

- 170 video

Min Transmit Frequency: 5.7 GHz

Max Transmit Frequency: 5.9 GHz

Operational Transmit Frequency: Channelized with 8 MHz spacing

Peak Power to Antenna: 200 mW

Average Power to Antenna: 200 mW



### GCS C2

Transmitter Type: Digital

Modulation and Coding: OQPSK DSSS

Min Transmit Frequency: 2.4 GHz

Max Transmit Frequency: 2.48 GHz

Operational Transmi t Frequency: Channelized with 5 MHz spacing

Peak Power to Antenna: 63 mW

Average Power to Antenna: 63 mW
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 14 - 00246 - CV IN RE TITEFLEX CORPO RAT ION, GASTITE DIVISIO N, RELATOR Original Proceeding 

### Ju ly 3 1 , 2014 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. On June 28, 2014, Relator, Titeflex Corporation, filed its petition for writ of mandamus in which it requested that this Court compel Respondent, the Honorable Ruben Reyes , presiding judge of the 72nd District Court of Lubbock County, to grant Relator’s motion for a continuance. This Court granted an emergency stay of the proceedings on June 28. On July 25 , 2014, Relator filed its unopposed motion to dismiss its petition in which Re lator represents to the Court that the parties have come to a confidential settlement agreement which renders moot the underlying subject of the mandamus action .2

Consequently, w e disp ense with the ten - day waiting period on this motion , grant Relator’s motion, and dismiss Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus . See T EX . R. A PP . P . 10.3 (a)(2) .
Mackey K. Hancock Justice
Cite as 2014 Ark. 424



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-14-818 JOHN CHAD GRIFFIN APPELLANT V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered October 9, 2014 MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY ON DIRECT APPEAL

MOTION GRANTED.
PER CURIAM Appellant pled guilty to first degree murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment. An appeal from the judgment has been lodged in this court. Griffin is represented by Timothy Beckham, a full-time public defender, who now asks that he be relieved as counsel on the ground that he is ineligible for compensation for services as appellate counsel. Arkansas Code Annotated section 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Repl. 2007) provides that persons employed as full-time public defenders who are not provided a state-funded secretary are eligible to seek compensation for appellate work. Counsel affirms that he is a full-time public defender with a full-time, state-funded secretary. Under these circumstances, he is not entitled to be paid for services in this appeal, and his request to be relieved is well founded. See Williamson v. State , 2013 Ark. 1 (per curiam). We grant Beckham’s motion to be relieved, and we appoint attorney Joseph K. Luebke to represent Griffin. Our clerk is directed to set a new briefing schedule for the appeal.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 134710(26) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134710 COA: 273736 Calhoun CC: 00-023332-FC PATRICK GRAHAM MCNAMEE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s November 29, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it doe s not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0211 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 19, 2008

Clerk
**Exhibit      32.1 **

**Certification      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As      Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section      906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|  | • | the                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September                30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on                the date                hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | • | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                for the periods presented therein. |
|--|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                                                                                                  |                                            |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                             |                                       |
|         | By:                                                                                                                                                         | /s/ Peter                W. DeVecchis, Jr. |
|         | Peter                  W. DeVecchis, Jr. President                  (principal                  executive officer)November                  14,                  2005 |
No. 42919.

#### Protests 775748-G, etc., of W. F. Jackson et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.