Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices 11411 

1 5 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55050 

(January 5, 2007), 72 FR 1786 (SR–BSE–2006–03) 

(‘‘Notice’’). 

4 In approving this proposed rule change, the 

Commission has considered the proposed rule’s 

impact on efficiency, competition, and capital 

formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 

5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 

6An ‘‘unrelated order,’’ generally, is a nonImprovement Order entered into the BOX market 

while a PIP is in progress. See paragraph (a) of 

Section 18 of Chapter V of the BOX rules. An 

‘‘Improvement Order,’’ generally, is an order 

submitted to a PIP to compete for a ‘‘PIP Order’’ (a 

customer order submitted to the PIP for price 

improvement). See paragraph (e)(i) of Section 18 of 

Chapter V of the BOX Rules. 

7As detailed in the Notice, certain unrelated 

Limit Orders on the same side of the market as a 

PIP Order terminate the PIP prematurely, while 

certain unrelated Limit Orders on the opposite side 

of the market immediately execute against the PIP 

Order (and allow the PIP to continue if the PIP 

Order has not been filled). The proposal clarifies 

the circumstances in which these early terminations 

and immediate executions take place, as well as the 

rules governing the prices that the PIP Order and 

unrelated Limit Order receive in each of these 

circumstances. 

8The proposal specifies that the BOX Trading 

Host does not accept Improvement Orders that 

would lock or cross the BOX Book. 

9 In addition, the Commission notes that BSE is 

currently obligated to provide certain reports to the 

Commission that provide data about BOX-Top and 

Market Orders that terminate the PIP prematurely, 

as well as BOX-Top and Market Orders that 

immediately execute against a PIP Order. BSE 

represents that it will provide the same information 

for Limit Orders that terminate the PIP prematurely 

or immediately execute against a PIP Order. 

10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 

11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 

4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 

concerning insider stock holdings and 

transactions. 

31. Sports-stuff.com Inc. is a Nevada 

company. Questions have arisen 

regarding the adequacy and accuracy of 

press releases concerning the company’s 

operations. 

32. UBA Technology, Inc., is a Nevada 

company. Questions have arisen 

regarding the adequacy and accuracy of 

press releases concerning the company’s 

operations. 

33. Wataire Industries Inc. is a Nevada 

company with offices in Surrey, British 

Columbia, Canada. Questions have 

arisen regarding the adequacy and 

accuracy of press releases concerning 

the company’s operations and assets. 

34. WayPoint Biomedical Holdings, 

Inc., is a Nevada company with offices 

in California. Questions have arisen 

regarding the adequacy and accuracy of 

press releases concerning the company’s 

operations and financing arrangements. 

35. Wineco Productions Inc. is a 

Nevada company with offices in 

Florida. Questions have arisen regarding 

the adequacy and accuracy of press 

releases concerning the company’s 

operations. 

The Commission is of the opinion that 

the public interest and the protection of 

investors require a suspension of trading 

in the securities of the companies listed 

above. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to 

Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, that trading in the 

companies listed above is suspended for 

the period from 9:30 a.m. EST, March 8, 

2007, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on 

March 21, 2007. 

By the Commission. 

Nancy M. Morris, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 07–1163 Filed 3–8–07; 1:43 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–55415; File No. SR–BSE–

2006–03] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston 

Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting 

Approval of Proposed Rule Change as 

Modified by Amendment No. 1, 

Relating to the Treatment of Limit 

Orders That Are Submitted to the 

Boston Options Exchange During a 

Price Improvement Period 

March 7, 2007. 

On December 8, 2006, the Boston 

Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BSE’’ or 

‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities 

and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change 

pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

to amend the rules of the Boston 

Options Exchange (‘‘BOX’’) relating to 

the treatment of Limit Orders that are 

submitted to the BOX during a Price 

Improvement Period (‘‘PIP’’). On 

January 4, 2007, the BSE filed 

Amendment No. 1 to the proposal. The 

proposed rule change, as amended, was 

published for comment in the Federal 

Register on January 16, 2007.3 The 

Commission received no comments on 

the proposal. This order approves the 

proposed rule change as modified by 

Amendment No. 1. 

The Commission finds that the 

proposed rule change is consistent with 

the requirements of the Act and the 

rules and regulations thereunder 

applicable to a national securities 

exchange 4 and, in particular, the 

requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the 

Act.5 Specifically, the Commission 

believes that the proposed rule change 

is consistent with the Act because it 

makes explicit how unrelated Limit 

Orders 6 in the same series as a PIP 

Order, submitted to the BOX during the 

PIP,7 are treated, and specifies the 

circumstances under which 

Improvement Orders are not accepted 

by the BOX Trading Host.8 The 

Commission believes that these rule 

amendments are reasonable and 

consistent with the Act, and should 

help clarify for investors and market 

participants how their orders are 

executed in various situations.9

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to 

Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,10 that the 

proposed rule change (SR–BSE–2006–

03) as modified by Amendment No. 1, 

be, and hereby is approved. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated 

authority.11

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7–4503 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–55407; File No. SR–ISE–

2007–13] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; 

International Securities Exchange, 

LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate 

Effectiveness of Proposed Rule 

Change Relating to Fee Changes 

March 6, 2007. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on February 

7, 2007, the International Securities 

Exchange, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) 

filed with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the 

proposed rule change as described in 

Items I, II, and III below, which Items 

have been substantially prepared by the 

ISE. The ISE has designated this 

proposal as one establishing or changing 

a due, fee, or other charge applicable 

only to a member under Section 

19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,3 and Rule 

19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which renders 

the proposal effective upon filing with 

the Commission. The Commission is 

publishing this notice to solicit 

comments on the proposed rule change 

from interested persons. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES