alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIK CANO-PEREZ, AKA Erik Cano, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 17-70000 

Agency No. A079-804-256 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 18, 2019**

Before: FARRIS, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Erik Cano-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying cancellation of removal and asylum 

and related relief. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de 

novo questions of law. Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 581 (9th Cir. 2016). We 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-70000 

deny the petition for review.

We do not consider Cano-Perez’s contentions that the agency applied the 

incorrect statutory definition to determine his Nevada conviction for forgery is an 

aggravated felony or that it erred in making an adverse credibility determination, 

where the agency did not find him removable for having an aggravated felony 

conviction, deny relief on that basis, or make an adverse credibility finding. See 

Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court’s review is 

limited to the actual grounds relied upon by the BIA). We also do not consider 

Cano-Perez’s contention that the IJ erred in considering factors for cancellation of 

removal for certain non-permanent residents under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b), where the 

BIA considered only the factors for cancellation of removal for permanent 

residents under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). See id. at 986.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
No. 60873.

#### Air Express International Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 296645-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of AcuNetx, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 9, 2010





By: /s/ Robert S. Corrigan


Robert S. Corrigan,


Acting Chief Financial Officer





This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "FILED" by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

David C. Rivers,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-2524 GEB PAN P

vs. Order

E. Roszko, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoNovember 29, 2004, plaintiff filed a civil rights complaint

and an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff was a prisoner when he filed but is now

at liberty.

Plaintiff’s affidavit demonstrates that, because of poverty,

he cannot pay or give security for court costs and still be able

to provide himself with the necessities of life. See Adkins v.

E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948). 

Case 2:04-cv-02524-GEB-EFB Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, plaintiff’s application is granted. 

Plaintiff shall provide the United States Marshal with

complete, current service instructions, summonses, and sufficient

copies of the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 4(c) so the Marshal may effect service within the time

required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The Marshal

shall then serve process upon defendants pursuant to plaintiff’s

instructions without payment of fees or expenses therefor. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)

So ordered.

Dated: April 26, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02524-GEB-EFB Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2


            Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer


The undersigned, Executive Vice President, Finance and Secretary, of Jaco
Electronics, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Annual Report") accompanying
this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods presented as required by such report. The
foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities
as principal financial officer of the Company, my own due diligence and
representations made by certain other members of the Company's senior
management.


Date:  September 28, 2005

                               /s/ Jeffrey D. Gash
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Jeffrey D. Gash
                               Executive Vice President, Finance and Secretary
                              (Principal Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 20, 2007, at 10 a.m., central time. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227, or (414) 231-2360. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, February 20, 2007, at 10 a.m., Central Time via a telephone conference call. You can submit written comments to the Panel by faxing the comments to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, PO Box 3205, Milwaukee, WI 53201-3205, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org*. This meeting is not required to be open to the public, but because we are always interested in community input we will accept public comments. Please contact Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360 for dial-in information.                 

The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues. 

Dated: January 8, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E7-378 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of FLATBUSH  FEDERAL BANCORP,  INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  we, Jesus
R.  Adia,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company  and John S.
Lotardo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

The purpose of this  statement  is solely to comply  with Title 18,  Chapter 63,
Section  1350 of the United  States  Code,  as  amended  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




                                          /s/ Jesus R. Adia
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Jesus R. Adia
                                          President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer



                                          /s/ John S. Lotardo
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          John S. Lotardo
                                          Executive Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 15, 2007
      ------------


                                       21
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of BankEngine Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ness Lakdawala, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ' 1350, as adopted pursuant to ' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





December 16, 2003

By: /s/ Joseph J. Alves

Name: Joseph J. Alves

Title: Chairman, CEO, Acting CFO and President
**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Anmore,
      Inc.
      for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2006, I, Giorgio Saumat, Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Anmore, Inc. hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.
        Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ending September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
        The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ended September 30, 2006, fairly represents in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Anmore, Inc.




Dated:
                November 13, 2006




**ANMORE,
      INC.**




By:
            */s/
                Giorgio Saumat*
              Principal
                Executive Officer and
              Principal
                Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jerry Treppel, Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           Information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.





Date:
                    February
      14, 2011
                    
                    /s/
      Jerry TreppelJerry
      TreppelChief
      Executive Officerof
      Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(Principal Executive
    Officer)





This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
 AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Notice of issuance of permits for endangered species and marine mammals.
 SUMMARY: The following permits were issued.
 ADDRESSES: Documents and other information submitted with these applications are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written request for a copy of such documents to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203; fax 703/358-2281.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Division of Management Authority, telephone 703/358-2104.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on the dates below, as authorized by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 
                    *et seq.*), and the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 
                    *et seq.*), the Fish and Wildlife Service issued the requested permits subject to certain conditions set forth therein. For each permit for an endangered species, the Service found that (1) The application was filed in good faith, (2) 
                    ( print page 11378)
                    the granted permit would not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species, and (3) the granted permit would be consistent with the purposes and policy set forth in Section 2 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Endangered Species
Permit number
Applicant
Receipt of application 
                            **Federal Register**
                             notice
Permit issuance date138823
Kathlyn C. Story
71 FR 76685, December 21, 2006
January 30, 2007.139893
Dr. Michael L. Fetterolf
71 FR 76684, December 21, 2006
January 30, 2007.140189
James M. Shook
71 FR 76684, December 21, 2006
January 30, 2007.140644
Carroll E. Moran
71 FR 76682, December 21, 2006
January 30, 2007.
 Marine Mammals Permit number
Applicant
Receipt of application 
                            **Federal Register**
                             notice
Permit issuance dateMA101713
The Marine Mammal Center
71 FR 44679; August 3, 2005
January 29, 2007.
 Dated: February 16, 2007. Monica Farris, Senior Permit Biologist, Branch of Permits, Division of Management Authority.


[FR Doc. E7-4547 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
---

---

Exhibit
4.(a).21

(not
an official translation-for convenience only)



The State of Israel
 Ministry of Communications
 General License for Partner Communications Ltd. for the Provision of
 Mobile Radio Telephone (MRT) Services using the Cellular Method

Amendment
No. 44

By virtue of the powers of the
Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the Communications Law
(Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, that have been delegated to us, by all our
other powers under any law and after having given Partner Communications Company
Ltd. (hereinafter: Partner) the opportunity to present their
arguments regarding this matter, we hereby amend the General License for the provision of
mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the cellular method granted to Partner on 7
April 1998, as follows:

# Amendment of Article 75

| | 1. | Sub-section
75.10 (b) shall be deleted.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------

(20 August 2007)

| |                                        |                            
| | -------------------------------------- | ---------------------------
|
|
|
|
| | (sgd)                                  | (sgd)                      
| | ___________________Mordechai Mordechai | ___________________Zeev Raz
| | Director-General                       | Temporary Director-General,
| |                                        | Engineering and Licensing  



---

---
No. 53589.

protest 142392-K (New York).

#### B. Westergaard & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 52053.

#### Jacob Adler & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 494617-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiffs was therefore sustained.
#### The Corporation of P. & F. Corbin, *Respondent, v.*Theodore H. Gordon and others, Appellants.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered ; costs to abide event. Opinion by

Talcott, J.
exh_1012.htm


Exhibit 10.12


 



ONVIA 2015 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN


 







 


Objectives


 


1.  Align executive compensation with shareholder interests


2.  Reward management for building shareholder value







Participants


 


Cameron Way                                                      


Naveen Rajkumar                                                      


Senior Vice President of Product                                                      







Structure of Plan







1.  Two metrics for plan: Bookings and EBITDA


2.  Floor Bookings and Floor EBITDA must both be achieved in order to activate the plan


3.  There are two levels of achievement (Between the Floor and the Target and above the Target)


4.  The two metrics are weighted as follows: Bookings (67%) and EBITDA (33%)







Plan Specifics







1.  If either Bookings or EBITDA falls below floor, no bonus is paid.


2.  If both Bookings and EBITDA floors are met, 25% of the Target Bonus is earned.


3.  If performance of each metric falls between the Floor and the Target, the Bonus is prorated between 25 and 100% based upon the weighting for each metric.


4.  The Over Target Bonus is indicated below.







Over Target Bonus







1.  Both Target Bookings and Target EBITDA must be achieved.


2.  For every EBITDA dollar achieved over target, 10% will be placed in an over target bonus pool.


3.  CEO will recommend to the Compensation Committee the allocation of the over target bonus pool to plan participants.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors

so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 14-BG-109

IN RE: GEORGE J. GEESING

Respondent.

Registration No. 449222 BDN: 458-13

BEFORE: Thompson, Associate Judge, and Pryor and Nebeker, Senior Judges. 

ORDER

(FILED - May 1, 2014)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland

suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of 90

days, see Attorney Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. Geesing, 80 A.3d 718 (Md.

2013), this court’s February 12, 2014, order suspending respondent pending further

action of the court and directing him to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of

a 90-day suspension should not be imposed, and the statements of Bar Counsel

regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing thatrespondent filed an affidavit that

satisfies the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g) and In re Goldberg, 460 A.2d

982 (D.C. 1983), it is

ORDERED that George J. Geesing, is hereby suspended from the practice of

law in the District of Columbia for a period of 90 days nunc pro tunc to January 2,

2014. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194,

198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to

all cases in which the respondent does not participate).

PER CURIAM