alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007308EN.01003301.xml

| 19.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/33

---

Corrigendum to State aid N 574/05 — Italy

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 133 of 15 June 2007
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 133 of 15 June 2007

(2007/C 308/11)

On page 6, first and second rows of State aid N 574/05:

for:

| 'Date of adoption of the decision | 22.12.2007 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 574/05', |

'Date of adoption of the decision

22.12.2007

Reference number of the aid

N 574/05',

read:

| 'Date of adoption of the decision | 22.12.2006 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 574/06'. |

'Date of adoption of the decision

22.12.2006

Reference number of the aid

N 574/06'.

---
-1- 

Substitution of Attorneys

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KELLY L. BORELLI (SBN 161499) 

LOTTE COLBERT (SBN 207157) 

RANDALL HAKES (SBN 233548) 

MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP 

1000 G Street, Third Floor 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 446-2300 

Facsimile: (916) 503-4000 

Attorney for Defendant Rose Maria Vivier 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LENARD SCOTT, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ROSE MARIA VIVIER 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: S-04-CV-2418 GEB DAD 

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS 

Defendant Rose Maria Vivier hereby substitutes Murphy Austin Adams Schoenfeld, LLP, 1000 

G Street, Third Floor, Sacramento, California, 95814; telephone number: (916) 446-2300; facsimile 

number: (916) 503-4000 as her counsel in the above-referenced action in lieu and in place of the Law 

Offices of John E. Virga, Inc. 

Dated: April 13, 2005 MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP 

/s/ Lotte Colbert 

By: 

KELLY L. BORELLI 

LOTTE COLBERT 

Attorneys for Defendant Rose Maria Vivier 

Case 2:04-cv-02418-DAD Document 7 Filed 04/20/05 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

Substitution of Attorneys

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

We consent to this substitution. 

Dated: April 13, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN E. VIRGA, INC. 

/s/ John E. Virga (as authorized on 4/13/05) 

By: 

John E. Virga 

I consent to this substitution. 

Dated: April 5, 2005 

/s/ Rose Maria Vivier (original signature retained by 

attorney Lotte Colbert) 

Rose Maria Vivier 

ORDER

It is so ordered. 

DATED: April 19, 2005 

 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. 

 United States District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-02418-DAD Document 7 Filed 04/20/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

John C. Montue,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 04-2663 GEB PAN P

vs. Order

Teresa A. Schwartz, et al.,

Respondents.

-oOoApril 13, 2005, the court granted petitioner in forma

pauperis status, served respondent and ordered a response to the

petition. 

April 15, 2005, petitioner filed an amended petition, which

supersedes his initial pleading. The Clerk of the Court shall

serve the amended petition on respondent and respondent shall

respond thereto within 60 days.

Case 2:04-cv-02663-LKK -JFM Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

April 18, 2005, petitioner moved for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis. The motion is moot in light of the April 13,

2005, order granting such leave, and therefore is denied.

So ordered.

Dated: April 26, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02663-LKK -JFM Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 2 of 2
NO. 07-99-0466-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

 	JUNE 6, 2001

	______________________________

	CIGNA INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,

			Appellant

	v.

	STEVE W. KILLION, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 136TH DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY;

	NO. D-150,917; HON. MILTON GUNN SHUFFIELD, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	On Motion for Rehearing

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

	Pending before the court are the motions of Cigna Insurance Company of Texas (Cigna) and Steve W. Killion.  That of Killion is overruled.  Concerning that of Cigna, however, we grant same to the extent that the insurer questions the manner in which costs were taxed via our judgment.  Through the latter, we ordered that “appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended . . . .”  Given that 1) Cigna was the appellant, 2) we sustained its first point of error, and 3) we reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded for further proceedings, we must also classify Cigna as the prevailing party.  As prevailing party, the insurer is entitled to have the costs of court awarded to it.  Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.  	Thus, we overrule the motion for rehearing filed by Steve W. Killion, grant that of Cigna Insurance Company of Texas, to the extent that it requests alteration of the manner in which costs were taxed, deny all other aspects of Cigna’s motion for rehearing, and order that Steve W. Killion pay all costs in this behalf expended.  Our judgment issued April 24, 2001 is hereby withdrawn and a corrected judgment is issued in lieu thereof.

	It is so ordered.

								Per Curiam

Do not publish.
**Exhibit 21**

Subsidiaries 

PrimeEnergyManagement Corporation, a New York corporation 100% owned by PrimeEnergy Corporation 

Prime Operating Company, a Texas corporation 100% ownedby PrimeEnergy Corporation 

Eastern Oil Well Service Company, a West Virginia corporation 100% owned by PrimeEnergy Corporation 

Southwest Oilfield Construction Company, an Oklahoma corporation, 100% owned by PrimeEnergy Corporation 

E O W S Midland Company, a Texas corporation, 100% owned by PrimeEnergy Corporation 

Prime Offshore L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company 90% owned by PrimeEnergy Corporation 

Chase Energy L.L.C., a Texas Limited Liability Company, 50% owned by PrimeEnergy Corporation
No. 61384.

protests 252454-K, 252768-K, and 258340-K (New York).

#### Morris Berger, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
----

----

| 1. | After Article 67F  shall come: |
|----|------------------------------------------|

|   | 67G.1 | The Licensee shall notify its subscribers with respect to offensive sites and content as defined in section 4i of the law, as set forth in section 4i(b)(1) of the law; said notification shall be done in the manner set forth in section 4i(c) of the law. |
|--------|-------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 67G.2 | The Licensee shall notify its subscribers with respect to the existence of internet content that is unsuitable for children and teenagers (for example pornographic sites), and will include a list of ways in which the access to such content by children and teenagers can be blocked; said notification shall be done in the manner set forth in section 4i(c) of the law. |
|--------|-------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 67G.3 | The Licensee shall offer its subscribers, in all of the ways set forth in section 4i(c) of the law, an effective service for filtering offensive sites and offensive content at no extra cost to the payment that he charges for the internet access service, and all as set forth in section 4i(d) of the law, as long as the said service shall be based on an analysis of the information and not a "black list" of only sites." |
|--------|-------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | After item number 85 in the list of services in the First Annex shall come: |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| 86. | Filtering of offensive sites and content on the internet  | 4/12 | The service is provided to a subscriber that uses internet access service. No additional charge in additional to the payment charged from the subscriber for internet access service. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Curtis J. Clawson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HLI Operating Company, Inc;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         /s/  Curtis J. Clawson   Curtis J. Clawson   *President and Chief Executive Officer*   June 14, 2007
37
Exhibit 31.1



President - Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 Certification



I, Peter W. DeVecchis, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Solomon Technologies, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |     |  |                                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: August 19, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ PETER W. DEVECCHIS                 
|                      |  |     |  | Peter W. DeVecchis                     
|                      |  |     |  | President (Principal Executive
Officer)
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification
      (c)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(d)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ John T. DrexlerJohn T. DrexlerVice President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bryon Johnson, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 789]

—Judgment unani*1017mously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress evidence of the victim’s showup identification of him. The showup was held at the scene and within a short period of time after the shooting incident. Although the victim was in the presence of another witness *(see, People v Duuvon,*77 NY2d 541, 545; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 1023, 1024; *People v Adams,*53 NY2d 241, 249; *People v Jenkins,*175 AD2d 648, 649, *lv denied*78 NY2d 1012) and defendant was in handcuffs in police custody *(see, People v Jones,*149 AD2d 970, *lv denied*74 NY2d 742), the showup procedures were tolerable in the interest of prompt identification.

The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for youthful offender treatment because defendant’s participation in the incident was not "relatively minor” *(see,*CPL 720.10 [2] [a]; [3] [ii]). In light of defendant’s prior youthful offender adjudication, the violent nature of the incident and defendant’s lack of remorse, we decline to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Netpliance, Inc.:


     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-35146), on Form S-8 of Netpliance, Inc. of our report dated March 23, 2001,
related to the balance sheets of Netpliance, Inc. as of December 31, 2000 and
1999, and the related  statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2000 and the period from January 12, 1999
(inception)  through December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31,
2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Netpliance, Inc.




                                            /s/ KPMG LLP



Austin, Texas
March 26, 2001
June 20, 1962

No. 66871.

#### Biddle Sawyer Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 59/14142, etc.

C.D. 2310. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-1129 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CHINA 

Signed at Geneva November 29, 2007 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CHINA 

 Trade 

 Memorandum of understanding signed 

 at Geneva November 29, 2007; 

 Entered into force November 29, 2007.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28499-28500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12057]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7458]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Picasso and Braque: The Cubist Experiment''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat.

[[Page 28500]]

2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority 
No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of 
August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in 
the exhibition ``Picasso and Braque: The Cubist Experiment,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Kimbell Art 
Museum, Fort Worth, Texas, from on or about May 29, 2011, until on or 
about August 21, 2011, the Santa Barbara Museum of Art, Santa Barbara, 
California, from on or about September 17, 2011, until on or about 
January 9, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 11, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-12057 Filed 5-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```