alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**     I, Robert J. Messey, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Arch Western Resources, LLC;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved.]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.       /s/ Robert J. Messey         Robert J. Messey    Vice President       Date: November 14, 2006
CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Scapple,
Inc. for the quarter ending September 30, 2003, I, David Feurborn, Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Scapple, Inc. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
          30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2003, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Scapple, Inc.

Dated:    September 14, 2004

Scapple, Inc.

By:  /s/ David Feurborn
-----------------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
# C_2007195EN.01001401.xml

| 23.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/14

---

Publication, pursuant to Article 12(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, concerning a cancellation application

(2007/C 195/07)

This publication confers the right to object the cancellation application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 (1). Statements of objections must reach the Commission within six months from the date of this publication.

1

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006

Cancellation request according to Article 12(2)

‘LIELER QUELLE’

EC No: DE/PDO/017/0917/23.7.2003

ImagePGI ImagePDO

1.   Registered name proposed for cancellation:

‘Lieler Quelle’

2.   Member State or Third Country:

Germany

3.   Type of product:

Class 2.2: Natural mineral waters and spring waters

4.   Person or body making request for cancellation:

| Name: | Bundesministerium der Justiz |
| --- | --- |
| Address: | Mohrenstraße 37 |
| D-10117 Berlin |

Name:

Bundesministerium der Justiz

Address:

Mohrenstraße 37

D-10117 Berlin

Nature of legitimate interest in making the request:

The applicant is the Member State responsible for the implementation of control measures for the protected designation. The only producer of the protected designation has agreed with the cancellation.

5.   Reasons for Cancellation:

The only producer of the protected designation refused the implementation of control measures. The control body thus asked German competent authorities to request the cancellation of the protected designation from the register of the European Union. The only producer later agreed with the cancellation request.

---

(1)  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

---
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4851 

To adjust the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area 

to include the Scarper Ridge property. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2024 

Mr. PADILLA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To adjust the boundaries of the Golden Gate National 

Recreation Area to include the Scarper Ridge property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Scarper Ridge Golden 

5 Gate National Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment Act 

6 of 2024’’. 

7 SEC. 2. SCARPER RIDGE BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT. 

8 Section 2(a)(2) of Public Law 92–589 (16 U.S.C. 

9 460bb–1(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4851 IS

1 ‘‘(F) Land generally depicted as ‘Proposed 

2 Boundary Addition’ on the map entitled ‘Gold3 en Gate National Recreation Area Proposed 

4 Boundary Addition’, numbered 641/193973, 

5 and dated July 2024.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 64176.

protest 59/27255 (New York).

#### Max Eckardt & Sons *v.*United States,

*467Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Periodic Financial Reports**     I, Paul A. Lang, President of Arch Western Resources, LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the“Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and     (2) information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Arch Western Resources, LLC.     /s/ Paul A. Lang     Paul A. Lang  PresidentDate: May 14, 2007
#                 Book/Printed Material                Romania : a country study
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ John T. DrexlerJohn T. DrexlerVice President
Date: May 17, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,628]


Quadrafab Corporation, Integral Fabrication Corporation, 
Plattsburgh, NY; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply 
for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on January 17, 2007, applicable to workers of 
QuadraFab Corporation, Plattsburgh, New York. The notice was published 
in the Federal Register on February 7, 2007 (72 FR 5748).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in the production of heated food display cases and fire alarm boxes.
    New information shows that in early 2006, QuadraFab Corporation 
purchased a portion of the assets of Integral Fabrication Corporation. 
Workers separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages 
reported under separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax accounts for 
both QuadraFab Corporation and Integral Fabrication Corporation.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of QuadraFab Corporation who were adversely affected by a shift 
in production to Canada.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,628 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of QuadraFab Corporation, Integral Fabrication 
Corporation, Plattsburgh, New York, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after December 15, 2005, through 
January 19, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to 
apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 
of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of March 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-4579 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ow2415.eot

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL L. OWENS,

Petitioner,

v.

D.L. RUNNELS, Warden, et al.,

Respondents.

CIV S-04-2415 GEB GGH P

ORDER

Good cause appearing, Respondent’s request for a thirty-day (30) enlargement of time is

granted. Therefore, the response to Petitioner’s first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus shall

be filed no later than October 28, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 10/4/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows

Case 2:04-cv-02415-GEB-GGH Document 38 Filed 10/04/05 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6322

HERMAN C. NEWMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-01-886-2) Submitted: June 6, 2003 Decided: July 9, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herman C. Newman, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Herman C. Newman, a Virginia pri soner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from a final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Newman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
AMENDMENTNO. 1

TO

EMPLOYMENTAGREEMENT

OF

JEFFREY D. GASH

        AMENDMENTNO. 1, effective as of July 1, 2001 (“Amendment”), to that certainEmployment Agreement, dated effective as of July 1, 1998 (the “EmploymentAgreement”), between Jaco Electronics, Inc., a New York corporation(“Jaco”), and Jeffrey D. Gash (hereinafter referred to as“Gash”), pursuant to which Gash has been employed as Vice President ofFinance of Jaco. Terms not defined in this Amendment shall have such meaningsotherwise ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement. 

        WHEREBY,Jaco and Gash desire to amend the Employment Agreement to properly reflect theintention of the parties. 

        NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises hereinafter set forth, the parties,intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: 

                    1.            Section 9 of the Employment Agreement entitled, “Consolidation; Merger;Change of Control”, is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by thefollowing: 

                                    9.1              In the event of any  consolidation  or merger of Jaco into or withanother  corporation  during the  Employment  Period,  and Jaco is not the survivingentity,  or the sale of all or  substantially  all of the  assets of Jaco to anothercorporation  during the Employment  Period, or in the event that fifty (50%) percentor  more  of the  voting  common  stock  of  Jaco  shall  be  owned  by one or  moreindividuals  or  entities,  who are acting in  concert  or as part of an  affiliatedgroup  (other  than a group one of the  members of which is Gash) at any time duringthe  Employment  Period,  (the  occurrence  of any of the  foregoing,  a "Change  ofControl"),  then (i) within thirty (30) days of the  occurrence of such event,  Jacoshall pay or cause to be paid to Gash a certified  or  cashier's  check in an amountequal to two hundred  percent  (200%) of the average of Gash's Base Salary plus CashBonus for the previous  five (5) years,  and (ii) this  Employment  Agreement may beassigned  by Jaco or any such  successor  or  surviving  corporation  with the priorwritten consent of Gash.

                                    9.2            Notwithstanding  the  provisions  of Section  9.1 above,  any suchpayments  shall be made  only in an  amount  which,  when  taken  together  with thepresent  value of all  other  payments  to Gash that are  contingent  on a Change ofControl of Jaco,  computed in accordance  with the provisions of Section  280G(d)(4)of the Internal  Revenue Code of 1986 (the  "Code"),  does not equal or exceed threetimes  Gash's  "Base   Amount",   as  computed  in  accordance   with  Code  Section280G(b)(3)."

                    2.            Notwithstanding the foregoing restatement of Section 9 of the EmploymentAgreement, all other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall continue infull force and effect. 

                                     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have each caused this Amendment tobe executed by its duly authorized representative, effective as of the date firstwritten above.
No. 64106.

protests 135540-K, etc. (New York).

#### J. A. Dougherty’s Sons, Inc., Distillers et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit32**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Lpath, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,Scott Pancoast, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Gary Atkinson, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to our knowledge: 

 
|        | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 
| Dated: November 13, 2006 |   |               |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------|
|                     |   |               |
|                     |   |               |
| /s/ Scott Pancoast       |   | /s/ Gary Atkinson  |
|                     |   |               |
| Scott Pancoast, CEO      |   | Gary Atkinson, CFO |

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

T.S., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3702

[August 1, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Gregory M. Keyser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502018CJ000552A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Philip Verges, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that the annual report on Form 10-K of Savanna East Africa, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Savanna East Africa, Inc.  Dated: October 25, 2010By:/s/ Philip VergesPhilip VergesChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### In the Matter of Gary Gaudioso, Petitioner, v Anthony J. Schembri, as Correction Commissioner of City of New York, et al., Respondents.

[633 NYS2d 142]

—Determination of respondent Department of Correction dated March 2, 1994, which terminated petitioner from his employment, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Stanley Sklar, J.], entered July 18, 1994) dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence, including the testimony of two chemists confirming the presence of marijuana in petitioner’s urine, supports respondent’s determination that, in violation of departmental rules, petitioner used marijuana. We note that the Administrative Law Judge was in the best position to ascertain the credibility of petitioner’s testimony that he had unknowingly ingested marijuana by eating a piece of cake containing the substance *(Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443-444). Finally, respondent’s termination of petitioner does not shock the conscience given the nature of his work *(see, Matter of Seelig v Koehler,*76 NY2d 87, 93-94, *166
      *cert denied*498 US 847). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
No. 57337.

protests 102563-K, etc. (Seattle).

#### S. Lisk & Bro. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer similar in all material respects to those the .subject of Abstract 56902, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 61892.

#### James G. Wiley Company *v.*United States,

protest 321238-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.