alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of CBD Media
LLC (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | 1. | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 6, 2004 |  |        |  |                        
|                     |  | By:    |  | /s/    Douglas A. Myers
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Douglas A. Myers       
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer



|                     |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 6, 2004 |  |        |  |                        
|                     |  | By:    |  | /s/    John P. Schwing 
|                     |  | Name:  |  | John P. Schwing        
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 38877.

#### Protests 761182-G, etc., of San Diego Fruit & Produce Co. et al. (Nogales, etc.).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit
31.01 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 I,
Jason McDiarmid, certify that: 1.          I
have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Essential Innovations Technology Corp.; 2.          Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.          Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.          The
small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have: (a)        designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)         evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and (c)         disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and 5.          The
small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a)         all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and (b)         any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting. Date: September 7, 2007 Jason McDiarmid
Principal Executive Officer
## SERVE D APRI L9 , 201 0 - oT.r n U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
I N TH EMATTE RO F NEWL Y WED S FOODS , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10SW000 3 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DMSNO
. FAA-2010-019 8
NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No
. 2009SW700272 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC
. Goodwin
. Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o n th e attache dServic e List
.

Ronni e A
. Yode r Chie f Administrativ e L; Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP10SW0003 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g ~ Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Joh n J
. Seely , Responden t Senio r Vic e Presiden t Newl y Wed s Food s 114 0 W
. Fullerto n Avenu e Chicago , I L6063 9 TEL : 773-489-700 0 FAX : 773-489-779 9 Jame s Archier , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ASW- 7 Southwes t

Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 Meacha mBlvd. , Suit e 6 E Fort Worth , T X 76193-000 7 TEL : 817-222-509 9 FAX : 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S
. Mail
. For

servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Hearing Docket , Federa

l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S
. W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Roo

m 2014 , Washington , DC 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
No. 47908.

#### Protests 803447-G, etc., of L. Greenberg & Son (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of rubber balloons trimmed with colored feathers fastened to one end of a hollow cane or stick composed in part of bamboo and the same as those the subject of Abstract 40493. The claim at 45 percent as articles in part of bamboo under paragraph 409 was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Martin Berns, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: April 11, 2008       By: /s/ Martin Berns
                               ----------------
                               Martin Berns, Director and
                               Principle Executive Officer
Case No. 6,345.

#### GEORGETOWN v. CHEW.

[5 Cranch, C. C. 508.] 1

Circuit Court, District *of*Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1838.

Mcxicipai, Coui’ojíatiojcs — Power to Rent Kish Wharves.

Tlie corporaiion of Georgetown has power to rent fish wharves.

Debt [by the mayor, recorder, aldermen, and common council of Georgetown] upon a bond for $2,030, conditioned to pay to the plaintiff tlie sum of $1.025 for rent of certain fish wharves belonging to the corporation of Georgetown. After oyer of the condition the defendant [Samuel Chew] demurred to the declaration.

R. J. Brent, for defendant, contended that • the corporation had no power to rent fish wharves; no such power is given them by their charter; and no corporation can exercise a power not expressly given or necessarily implied from some express power. Ang. & A. Corp. 140, 140.

But

THE COURT

(CRANCH, Chief Judge,

not giving any opinion) instantly overruled the demurrer without hearing Mr. Dunlap, for plaintiffs.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Bo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Date: April 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Liu BoLiu Bo

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)
(Reap. Dec. 8663)

Entry No. 4167.

#### Pacific Music Supply Co. Guy B. Barham Co. *v.*United States

(Decided September 26, 1956)

*Lawrence & Tuttle {George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *{Samuel D. Spector,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts. On such facts, I find that the merchandise herein, which was appraised at deutschemarks 9.80 each, less 3 per centum discount, plus prorated packing, to be properly valued at deutschemarks 8.40 each, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Before the First Division,

December 20, 1955

No. 59591.

protests 28252-K, etc. (New York).

#### S. S. Kresge Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with the stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” consist of animal or human figures, composed wholly or in chief value of papier máché, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56975, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1403 was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of novelty figures, composed in chief value of papier máché, were held dutiable at 12)4 ■percent under said paragraph 1403, as modified, *supra.*
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135021 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 135021 

 COA: 268264 

Kent CC: 04-009942-FC 

RUDOLPH JEROME HORTON,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

address: (1) whether the serologist’s testimony regarding nontestifying technicians’ 

findings and reports was “testimonial” within the meaning of Crawford v Washington, 

541 US 36; 124 S Ct 1354; 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004); (2) whether the defendant waived 

the Crawford issue; and (3) whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the 

defendant’s substantial rights were affected by the error, if any, and that the fairness, 

integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings in this case was seriously 

affected by the error, if any. 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the April 2008 session 

calendar for argument and submission. Appellant’s brief and appendix must be filed no 

later than January 31, 2008, and appellee’s brief and appendix, if appellee chooses to 

submit an appendix, must be filed no later than February 21, 2008. 

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense 

Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae, to be filed no later than 

March 6, 2008. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues 

presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae, 

with such briefs to be filed no later than March 6, 2008. 

p1213 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 20, 2007 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Spectrum Currency L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




















By:             /s/            Christian Angstadt





Name:                                Christian Angstadt


Title:                      Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC,


general partner of the registrant





Date:                      March 29, 2010
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT TUNSTALL,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2658 DFL JFM P

vs.

TERESA A. SCHWARTZ, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 25, 2005, this court issued findings and

recommendations recommending dismissal of the action without prejudice due to petitioner’s

failure to exhaust state remedies. On September 12, 2005, petitioner filed objections to the

findings and recommendations in which he contends that he did exhaust state court remedies in a

petition for review to the California Supreme Court, which was denied by order filed November

10, 2004. Petitioner has attached to his objections a copy of the order denying the petition for

review, but has not filed a copy of the petition for review itself.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02658-JAM -JFM Document 6 Filed 10/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days from

the date of this order petitioner shall file a copy of the petition for review docketed in the

California Supreme Court as Case No. S127295 and denied by order filed November 10, 2004.

DATED: October 12, 2005. 

12

tuns2658.fb

Case 2:04-cv-02658-JAM -JFM Document 6 Filed 10/13/05 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darren Fleming, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 115]

—Judgment of the Supreme Court, New. York County (Clifford Scott, J.), rendered July 21, 1993, convicting defendant, after trial by jury, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of *41⁄2*to 9 years, is unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial.

As the People concede, despite three requests by defendant’s trial counsel that the entire jury *voir dire*be recorded in accordance with Judiciary Law § 295, the trial court permitted only recordation of the actual exercise of challenges for cause and peremptory challenges. Because of this, there is no record available for effective appellate review of defendant’s claim regarding his challenge for cause of one juror. That compelled defendant to exercise a peremptory challenge. All of the peremptory challenges were thereafter exhausted by defendant. As the People further concede, there is no basis to believe that the challenged portion of the record could be reconstructed at this point, since, even immediately after it occurred, counsel and *288the court could not agree on what the juror had said. Because defendant has been prejudiced by the absence of a stenographic record, and a reconstruction hearing would not cure the impairment of effective appellate review under the circumstances, reversal is mandated *(see, People v Harrison,*85 NY2d 794, 798).

Since we reverse and remand for a new trial, we do not reach the other contentions raised by defendant. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Asch, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.
| (1)   | the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Debut Broadcasting Corporation Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Debut Broadcasting Corporation Inc. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                           |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Ronald Heineman_                           |   |
|   |   | Name:Ronald Heineman                           |   |
|   |   | Title:Principal Executive Officer and Director |   |
|   |   |                                           |   |
|   |   | Date:May 12,2011                               |   |

|   |   |                              |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Sariah Hopkins                |   |
|   |   | Name:Sariah Hopkins               |   |
|   |   | Title:Principal Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                              |   |
|   |   | Date:May 12,2011                  |   |

----