alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51149 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-363-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Miguel Angel Lopez-Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 38872.

#### Protests 823978-G, etc., of Charles Ewels et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 60860.

#### Indian Sales Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 210976-K and 216672-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ammeters, not in chief value of glass, designed and fitted for use on “Indian” motorcycles, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Lucas Electrical Services, Inc.,*and *Frank J. Eberle Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 1776), except that the ammeters in question are designed and fitted for use as parts of motorcycles, rather than as parts of automobiles, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 49644.

#### Protest 11128-K of Richard Heilbrunn (New York).

Ekwall, Judge:

This case is before us on rehearing having been originally decided in C. D. 668. We there held that damage to certain knitting machines and accessories, caused by rust and discoloration as a result of a fire on the importing vessel during the course of the voyage, did not constitute a nonimpor-tation but only partial damage against which the statute (paragraph 398, Tariff Act of 1930) specifically prohibits allowance. We further held that in assessing duty at the appropriate rate applicable to textile machines not specially pro*265vided for and parts of the same, under paragraph 372 of the same law, the collector acted in conformity with "the law.

A rehearing was granted on the ground, as stated in the court’s order, that “the description of the machinery as contained in the entry papers and exhibits may be clarified.”

The additional evidence presented upon rehearing is in the form of replies to interrogatories addressed to the plaintiff. From these replies it appears that the “sley bars,” “arrangements for individual drive,” and “rack counter,” appearing on the invoice as accessories, are essential to the operation of the machines in suit and “belong to the usual complement of the machine.” In reply to the question “Which, if any, of these three types of accessories were injured to such an extent that you had to replace them,” deponent replied: “A greater part of all types of these accessories for the three machines had to be replaced on account of extensive corrosion.” He further testified that “All the parts were unusable,” but that some of the parts were later repaired and made usable.

Plaintiff’s theory is that what was shipped consisted of complete knitting machines; that what was imported consisted of certain parts of knitting machines properly dutiable as assessed and what had once been parts of the same machines but which by reason of corrosion had become useless. That is, he contends that as imported the merchandise consisted of certain sound parts of knitting machines apd certain other articles the usefulness of which as machine parts had been destroyed. We find nothing in the ease as presented on rehearing that convinces us of the correctness of this theory. For this reason we.adhere to our former ruling that the merchandise imported consisted of three complete knitting machines partially damaged and that the collector acted within the law in refusing to allow for damage to the merchandise.

Judgment will therefore be rendered for the defendant.
Case 2:04-cv-02196-GEB -KJM   Document 21    Filed 11/28/05   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-20T17:35:15-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# C_2007164EN.01004501.xml

| 18.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/45

---

Corrigendum to Notification pursuant to Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 153 of 6 July 2007
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 153 of 6 July 2007

(2007/C 164/11)

In the contents on page 1 of the cover, and on page 1, in the title:

for:

‘Notification pursuant to Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code’,

read:

‘Notification by Bulgaria pursuant to Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code’.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

JAMES WHITTENBERG,

Plaintiff,

v.

LIEUTENANT L. ROLL,

Defendant.

CASE NO. CIV S-04-2313 FCD JFM P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

NUNC PRO TUNC APPLICATION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY

REQUESTS

Defendant Roll’s nunc pro tunc application for extension of time to file a response to 

Plaintiff’s discovery was considered by this Court, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ application is granted, and defendant

Roll’s responses to interrogatories, signed November 18, 2005, are deemed timely.

DATED: December 21, 2005.

whit2313.nunc

Case 2:04-cv-02313-FCD-JFM Document 48 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 1
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT O c t obe r 25, 2007 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H]

I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 12273 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D
. C
. D ocketN o. 03 -027 83 -C V -P T -M S T E V E N A L L A N F I K E , in d iv idu a lly , A N D R E A R A I F O R D D O X T A T O R , i ndi vi dua l l yand a s m othe rand n e x t f r ie n do f A p r il G o w e n , am in o r ,
P la in tif f s - A p p e llan ts , A R L E N E R I C H A R D S O N , A dm i ni strat or of the es t at e of B illie N a d in e B ig h a m , P la in tif f , W I L L I A M J E R R Y W E S T B R O O K , E x e c u to ro f

th e e s ta te o f

N a d in e B ig h a m ,
Int erveno r- P l ai nt i ffA p p e llan t,

v ersu s2

J O H N E A R L P E A C E , an in d iv idu a l, D .G . T R U C K I N G C O M P A N Y , G E N E R A L S H A L E C O R P O R A T I O N , ac o rp o r a tio n , a .k .a . G e n e r a l S h a le B u ild in g M a te r ia ls , G P , apartne r s hi p c om pos e d of G e ne r a l S ha l e B ui l di ng M at er i al s, Inc. and W i ent zber ger B aw ot off I n du s tr ie s A G ,
D e f e n d an ts
- A p p e lle e s .

________________________ A pp ea l s f

rom the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D i s tr i c to f A l ab a ma

_________________________ ( O c t ob e r 25, 2007) B efo re B A R K E T T , M A R C U S an dW IL S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: W e f i nd no re vers i bl e e rr or i n the di stri ctcourt ’ s grantof S um m ary Ju d g me n ti n f

a v o ro f G e n e r a l Sh a l e Pr o du c t s , LLC. AF F I R ME D.
Attachment 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID SAVAGE, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-S-04-2316 WBS KJM

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM

_______________________________/

On January 17, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections

to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02316-WBS -KJM Document 48 Filed 04/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 17, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Counterclaim plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment against

counterclaim defendant Phyliss Savage is granted; and

3. The proposed judgment filed December 8, 2005 (docket no. 28, attachment no.

5) is hereby adopted. 

DATED: March 31, 2006

Case 2:04-cv-02316-WBS -KJM Document 48 Filed 04/03/06 Page 2 of 2
<page>

									           EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter
Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

     (2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partner-
ship.







By:	/s/Christian Angstadt

Name:		Christian Angstadt
Title:		Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2009
For inclusion in docket no. EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0492, Review of Particulate Matter National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS)

EPA Meeting Summary  

Date of Meeting:  October 16, 2012

Topic:  Discuss PM NAAQS proposed rule section on initial area designations

Attendees:  Representatives from the following state and local air agencies:

Connecticut (Anne Gobin)   

New York (Dave Shaw)   

Maryland (Tad Aburn)   

Allegheny County, PA (Jim Thompson)   

Georgia (Jac Capp)   

Indiana (Keith Baugues)  

Louisiana (Tegan Treadaway)   

Kansas (Rick Brunetti)

Linn County, Iowa (Jim Hodina)   

Colorado (Garry Kaufman)   

California – CARB (Lynn Terry)   

Sacramento, CA (Larry Greene)   

Great Basin Air District, CA (Ted Schade)  

Puget Sound, WA (Craig Kenworthy)  

Nancy Kruger (National Association of Clean Air Agencies)

EPA representatives:  Michael Ling, Rich Damberg, Anna Wood, Rhea Jones, Beth Palma, Scott Mathias,

James Hemby, Sara Schneeberg

Summary of Meeting:  EPA staff summarized the initial area designation process as outlined in the June

2012 PM NAAQS proposal.  EPA reviewed the timing of a typical 2‐year area designation schedule, which

would include the submittal of area designation recommendations, including area boundaries, by States

and Tribes within 1 year of promulgating a new or revised standard (e.g., by December 2013, assuming

promulgation of the PM standard in December 2012); EPA issuance of letters to States and Tribes at

least 120 days prior to finalizing designations (August 2014); and EPA issuance of final designations

(December 2014).   

State and local air agency representatives asked questions and made suggestions about the future

designations process for the new/revised PM NAAQS.  EPA indicated that it would issue designations

guidance shortly after the promulgation of any new or revised PM NAAQS, and would continue

consulting with states throughout the designations process.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4798 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4798

 To provide a combat status identifier equivalent for remotely piloted 
  aircraft crew who conduct combat operations, and require a study to 
identify opportunities to provide more support services to, and greater 
             recognition of, their combat accomplishments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2024

 Ms. Rosen (for herself and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide a combat status identifier equivalent for remotely piloted 
  aircraft crew who conduct combat operations, and require a study to 
identify opportunities to provide more support services to, and greater 
             recognition of, their combat accomplishments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Combat Action Recognition and 
Evaluation (CARE) for Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Crews Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. COMBAT STATUS IDENTIFIER EQUIVALENT FOR REMOTELY PILOTED 
              AIRCRAFT CREW.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretaries of the military departments shall establish a 
status identifier of equivalent merit as a combat status identifier for 
remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) crew who conduct combat operations.

SEC. 3. STUDY ON COMBAT ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT 
              CREW.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter 
into an agreement with a federally funded research and development 
center to conduct an independent study to identify opportunities to 
provide more support services to, and greater recognition of, combat 
accomplishments of RPA crew.
    (b) Elements.--The study required under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) explore methods for identifying those members of a RPA 
        crew who conduct combat operations;
            (2) review the manner of documentation for RPA crew 
        conducting combat operations;
            (3) propose decorations and awards for combat operations 
        available to RPA crew;
            (4) assess whether to award campaign medals for RPA crew 
        conducting combat operations in a named campaign; and
            (5) examine whether post-separation health (including 
        mental health) care is available to RPA crew who conduct combat 
        operations.
                                 <all>
```
No. 52341.

protests 690512-G, etc. (New York).

#### B. Altman & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the .protests.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Bo, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:             
       February 14, 2011
              By:
              /s/ Liu BoLiu
      Bo
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                (principal
      executive officer)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1687-DR]


Alabama; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1687-DR), dated March 3, 2007, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: March 6, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the Public 
Assistance program and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program for the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of March 3, 2007:

Dale, Dallas, Henry, Montgomery, and Wilcox Counties for Individual 
Assistance.
Coffee County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance).
Henry and Wilcox Counties for Public Assistance.

    All counties within the State of Alabama are eligible to apply 
for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management and Director of FEMA.
[FR Doc. E7-4431 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to the Quarterly Report of Fruit Of The Loom Unsecured Creditors Trust (the UCT) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Edward Clingman, Jr., a principal of Clingman & Hanger Management Associates, LLC, Trust Administrator of the UCT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the UCT.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                        |  |                               
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: October 5, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | Clingman & Hanger Management Associates, LLC as Trust Administrator of the Fruit Of The Loom Unsecured Creditors Trust
|                      |  |  |  |    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                        |  | /s/    W. EDWARD CLINGMAN,
JR.
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                        |  | W. Edward Clingman, Jr.       
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                        |  | Principal
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,319-01
IN RE DWIG HT WOL F , Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. CR-10111- 2014 IN THE 411T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM TRINITY COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to t h e o ri g inal jurisdiction of this C ourt. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a wr it of habea s corpus in the 411th Di s t rict Court of Trinity County , that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the application has not yet bee n forwa rded to this Court. In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Trinity County , is or dere d to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates issues to be investigated ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that-2-

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Trini t y C o u n t y . S hould the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorne y ’s o ff i ce was
serve d with the habeas ap p l i ca t i o n shall also be subm itted with the response. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has su b m i t t ed the appropr iate re sponse. Such re sponse shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: De cembe r 10, 2014 Do not publish