alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 49 

To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 to extend the 

moratorium on drilling off the coasts of the States of Florida, Georgia, 

and South Carolina, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2023 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 

to extend the moratorium on drilling off the coasts of 

the States of Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Shores Pro5 tection Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 49 IS

1 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON OIL AND GAS LEASING OFF THE 

2 COASTS OF THE STATES OF FLORIDA, GEOR3 GIA, AND SOUTH CAROLINA. 

4 Section 104 of the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security 

5 Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 1331 note; Public Law 109–432) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)— 

8 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

9 by striking ‘‘June 30, 2022’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘June 30, 2032’’; 

11 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

12 after the semicolon; 

13 (C) in paragraph (3)(B)(iii), by striking 

14 the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; 

15 and 

16 (D) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(4) any area in the South Atlantic Planning 

18 Area (as designated by the Bureau of Ocean Energy 

19 Management as of the date of enactment of this 

20 paragraph); or 

21 ‘‘(5) any area in the Straits of Florida Planning 

22 Area (as designated by the Bureau of Ocean Energy 

23 Management as of the date of enactment of this 

24 paragraph).’’; and 

25 (2) by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 49 IS

1 ‘‘(d) EFFECT ON CERTAIN LEASES.—The moratoria 

2 under paragraphs (4) and (5) of subsection (a) shall not 

3 affect valid existing leases in effect on the date of enact4 ment of this subsection. 

5 ‘‘(e) ENVIRONMENTAL EXCEPTIONS.—Notwith6 standing subsection (a), the Secretary may issue leases in 

7 areas described in that subsection for environmental con8 servation purposes, including the purposes of shore protec9 tion, beach nourishment and restoration, wetlands restora10 tion, and habitat protection.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report of IceWEB, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the Year ending September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, John R. Signorello, Principal Executive Officer and the Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Yearly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Yearly Report fully presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                        By: /s/ John R. Signorello
                                            ----------------------
                                            John R. Signorello
                                            Principal Executive Officer and
                                            Principal Financial Officer
                                            January 13, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2080-2081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10779]


Oregon Disaster <greek-i> OR-00016

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oregon (FEMA-1672-
DR), dated 12/29/2006.
    Incident: Severe storms, flooding, landslides, and mudslides.
    Incident Period: 11/05/2006 through 11/08/2006.
    Effective Date: 12/29/2006.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/27/2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit Completed Loan Applications to: U.S. Small Business

[[Page 2081]]

Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 12/29/2006, private non-
profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties: Clatsop, Hood River, Lincoln, Tillamook.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             5.250
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10779.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008).

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-482 Filed 1-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000317 12-JUL-2019 10:13 AM
No. 56457.

protests 174809-K, etc. (New York).

#### Robert B. Adelman, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION** **PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Joseph D. Perillo, certify that,

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc.; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: June 8, 2020 |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ Joseph D. Perillo                                       |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |   |   |   |   | Joseph D. Perillo                                                          |
|                    |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) |
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0731 Directorate Identifier: 2010

-NE

- 39

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:** 
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

HPC shaft r 

### eplacement 180.0 $15,300. 00 $210,211 $225,511.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation:

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
# C_2007045EN.01000201.xml

| 28.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 45/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | — |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 687/06 |
| Member State | Slovakia |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Pomoc spoločnosti Kalligram s.r.o. v prospech periodika „OS — Fórum občianskej spoločnosti“ |
| Legal basis | a) | Zákon č. 523/2004 Z. z. o rozpočtových pravidlách verejnej správy a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov, |

Date of adoption of the decision

—

Reference number of the aid

N 687/06

Member State

Slovakia

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Pomoc spoločnosti Kalligram s.r.o. v prospech periodika „OS — Fórum občianskej spoločnosti“

Legal basis

a)

Zákon č. 523/2004 Z. z. o rozpočtových pravidlách verejnej správy a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov,

| b) | Zákon č. 231/1999 Z. z. o štátnej pomoci v znení zákona č. 203/2004 – § 4 ods. 1, písm. d), |
| --- | --- |

b)

Zákon č. 231/1999 Z. z. o štátnej pomoci v znení zákona č. 203/2004 – § 4 ods. 1, písm. d),

| c) | Výnos Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky č. MK – 2165/2006-110/6075, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa výnos MK SR č. MK – 12947/05-110/30493 o poskytovaní dotácií v pôsobnosti Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky |
| --- | --- |

c)

Výnos Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky č. MK – 2165/2006-110/6075, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa výnos MK SR č. MK – 12947/05-110/30493 o poskytovaní dotácií v pôsobnosti Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Culture

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: SKK 1,3 million; Overall budget: —

Intensity

71 %

Duration

1.1.2006-31.12.2006

Economic sectors

Media

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministerstvo kultúry SR |
| --- |
| Nám. SNP 33 |
| SK-813 31 Bratislava |

Ministerstvo kultúry SR

Nám. SNP 33

SK-813 31 Bratislava

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
Exhibit
10.1


 


Agreement
between Dandrit Biotech A/S, Fruebjergvej 3, 2100 Kebenhavn 0, CVR 26027322 (Chairman of the board - Attorney at Law Niels Erik
Nielsen) and Robert W Wolfe, Randolph, Vermont regarding the continuance and termination of the CFO Contract dated Feb. 10 2014.


  


1.          The
salary owed (based on 2014 contract), the outstanding unpaid expenses (submitted in January and February to Marianne), attorney
fees and any additional expenses (pursuant to our contract) are paid by the Company. Attorney Fees (Denmark and US) is maximized
to 4.000 USO.


 


2.          The
CFO contract with all terms and conditions remaining the same except for the changes agreed in point 4, 5 , 6 and 7 below.


 


3.          Bob
continue to work for the Company including finalizing the 10-K filing in relation to 2014.


 


4.          After
filing the 10-K, Bob receives a bonus of $ 10.000.00 USO.


 


5.           The
parties agree that the contract terminates end of October 2015. Reference is made to the notice provisions (point 10.l). Bob
Wolfe is paid his agreed salary ex. additional expenses during that period even though a new CFO has taken over his
responsibilities.


 


6.          The Company will hire a new CFO to take over CFO duties during March/April 2015.


 


7.          SEC requires an 8K filing for change of officers and/or directors of within 4 days of the agreement regarding any change. Bob
Wolfe will initiate this filing. On (March 13 2015).


 


8.          Bob Wolfe offers - at the discretion of the Company -to act as Consultant in securing that the Company meets the SEC requirement
in future filings etc. Bob Wolfe charges 150 USO per hour - however the first 100 hours used from May 1 until end October 2015
will be free of charge.


 


Agreed
this 13th day of March 2015.


 


On behalf
of:


 


	DanDrit
    Biotech A/S	 	DanDrit
    Biotech USA, Inc.	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/
    NE Nielsen	 	/s/
    NE Nielsen	 	/s/
    Robert E. Wolfe
	NE
    Nielsen, Chairman	 	NE
    Nielsen, Chairman	 	Robert
    E. Wolfe
No. 56429.

protests 981270-G, etc. (New York).

#### Cohen & Mann et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of mah jong sets composed of synthetic resin similar in all material respects to the1 synthetic resin articles the subject of Abstract 54651. The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of IceWEB, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John R. Signorello, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  December 29, 2010/s/ John R. SignorelloJohn R. Signorello, Chief Executive Officer and
principal executive officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Harvey Simpson et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Sutton East Associates 86, Appellant-Respondent, and Cousins Contracting Corp. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[635 NYS2d 465]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan *280Lobis, J.), entered May 16, 1995, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Lobis, J., without costs and disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Asch and Williams, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 99.4

COMMENTS BY AUDITORS ON CANADA-UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
REPORTING DIFFERENCE

In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of
an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there are
changes in accounting principles that have a material effect on the
comparability of the Companys financial statements, such as the changes
described in Note 3 to the financial statements. Our report to the
shareholders dated February 12, 2003 is expressed in accordance with Canadian
reporting standards, which do not require a reference to such changes in
accounting principles in the auditors report when the changes are properly
accounted for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chartered Accountants
Toronto, Ontario
February 12, 2003
Exhibit 10.11

 

AMENDMENT 4

 

TO

 

ANACOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

 

ADVISORY BOARD AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment, effective January 1, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), is to Advisory Board Agreement commencing October 1, 2005, and any subsequent Amendments (the “Agreement”) between Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Company”) and Lucy Shapiro, Ph.D. (“Advisor”), together, the Parties.

 

Pursuant to this Amendment, the Parties agree as follows:

 

1.              The term of the Agreement, as defined in Section 4, shall be modified to extend from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015.

 

2.              Subject to approval by the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company will grant an additional nonstatutory stock option to purchase 1,500 shares of the Company’s common stock, with an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value at the time of grant. Such shares will vest at the rate of l/24th of the total number of shares on each monthly anniversary of the vesting commencement date of January 1, 2014, based upon the Advisor’s continued service to the Company, as provided in the Agreement and as specified in the Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Advisor.

 

3.              All other terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement remain in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.

 

 

	
ANACOR   PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    	
 
    	
LUCY   SHAPIRO, PH.D.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By: 
    	
/s/   Lucy O. Day
    	
 
    	
By:   
    	
/s/   Lucy Shapiro, Ph.D.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name: Lucy O. Day
    	
 
    	
Name:   Lucy Shapiro, Ph.D.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title: VP Finance
    	
 
    	
Title:   Advisor
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date: 3/11/14
    	
 
    	
Date:   3/11/14
Before the Third Division,

September 14, 1945

No. 50490.

#### Protests 31293-K, etc., of Swiss American Cheese Co. (New York).

*268Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated as follows: (1) That certain of the merchandise consists of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Gruyere Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 171, C. D. 562) and *Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 767); and (2) .that certain other merchandise consists of portions of cheese packed in boxes and that all such portions, except one portion which is Tilsit, are similar to the cheese the subject of the above-cited cases. In accordance therewith it was held that the merchandise in question is properly dutiable at 5 cents per pound, but not less than 20 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 710, as modified by T. D.- 48554.
Case No. 16,102.

#### UNITED STATES v. FISHER.

[5 McLean, 23.] 2

Circuit Court, D. Ohio.

Oct. Term, 1849.

Embezzlement from Mail—Indictment—Article: of Value.

1. Where an indictment charges the carrier-of the mail with stealing a letter out of it, it is-sufficient.

2. If the letter contain an article of value, it must be so averred in the indictment, to subject the defendant to the incurred penalty.

3. But as it is an offence to steal a letter which, contains no article of value, it is not necessary to aver that it contained no such article.

The District Attorney, for the Government.

Mr. Lawrence, for defendant.

2

 [Reported by Hon John McLean, Circuit Justice.]

OPINION OF THE COURT. This is an. indictment against the defendant [John Fisher], charging him as carrier of the mail, with stealing letters, &c. A motion is made to-quash certain counts in the indictment which charge the defendant with stealing a letter, without alleging that it contained no article of value. This is not necessary. A carrier-of the mail is subject to a higher penalty where he steals a letter out of the mail,, which contains an article of value. And. when this offense is committed, the indictment must allege the letter contained an article of value, which aggravates the offense- and incurs a higher penalty. But where the offense consists in stealing a letter, it may *1087be so laid in the indictment, and the proof cannot go beyond the indictment. The motion is overruled.

The evidence being heard by the jury, he was convicted, and sentenced by the court
Exhibit 10.9


 


This Guaranty Agreement (the “Guaranty”) is executed as of March 16, 2015.





 


 






    	1



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	2



    	 



    

 


 






    	3



    	 



    

 


 






    	4



    	 



    

 


 






    	5



    	 



    

 


 






    	6



    	 



    

 


 






    	7



    	 



    

 


 






    	8



    	 



    

 


 






    	9



    	 



    

 


 






    	10



    	 



    

 


 






    	11



    	 



    

 


 






    	12



    	 



    

 


 






    	13
Before the Third Division,

May 14, 1948

No. 52329.

protests 963136-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Kwong Yick & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
ACCEPTED

04-14-00883-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

3/26/2015 6:04:31 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/26/2015 6:04:31 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk