Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices 11325 

1The Department notes that this administrative 

review will continue with respect to CP Kelco BV 

and Noviant BV. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–421–811 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from 

the Netherlands: Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review in Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

petitioner Aqualon Company, a division 

of Hercules Incorporated (‘‘Aqualon’’), a 

U.S. manufacturer of 

carboxymethylcellulose (‘‘CMC’’), the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on CMC from 

the Netherlands. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 71 FR 51573 

(August 30, 2006). This administrative 

review covers the period December 27, 

2004, through June 30, 2006. We are 

now rescinding this review with respect 

to Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry BV 

and Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals 

B.V. (collectively, ‘‘Akzo’’) due to the 

withdrawal of Aqualon’s review request 

with respect to Akzo.1

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dena Crossland or Stephen Bailey, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Room 7866, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3362 or 

(202) 482–0193, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department published an 

antidumping duty order on CMC from 

the Netherlands on July 11, 2005. See 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from 

Finland, Mexico, the Netherlands and 

Sweden, 70 FR 39734 (July 11, 2005). 

The Department published a notice of 

‘‘Opportunity to Request an 

Administrative Review’’ of the 

antidumping duty order for the period 

December 27, 2004, through June 30, 

2006, on July 3, 2006. See 71 FR 37890. 

Petitioner Aqualon requested that the 

Department conduct an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on CMC from the Netherlands on July 

27, 2006. In response to this request 

from petitioner, the Department 

published the initiation of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

on CMC from the Netherlands on 

August 30, 2006. See 71 FR 51573. The 

Department received petitioner’s request 

for withdrawal of the administrative 

review with respect to Akzo on 

February 15, 2007. 

Rescission of the Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 351.213(d)(1), 

the Secretary will rescind an 

administrative review under this 

section, in whole or in part, if a party 

that requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of notice of initiation of the 

requested review, or withdraws at a 

later date if the Department determines 

it is reasonable to extend the time limit 

for withdrawing the request. Petitioner’s 

request is past the 90-day time limit; 

however, we find that it is reasonable to 

extend the deadline because the 

Department has not yet devoted 

significant time or resources to this 

review. In response to petitioner’s 

withdrawal of its request for an 

administrative review, as well as the 

fact that we have not yet issued 

preliminary results, the Department 

hereby rescinds the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on CMC from the Netherlands for the 

period December 27, 2004, through June 

30, 2006, with respect to Akzo. 

The Department intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions to 

Customs and Border Protection 15 days 

after the date of the publication of this 

notice. The Department will direct CBP 

to assess antidumping duties for Akzo at 

the cash deposit rate in effect on the 

date of entry for entries during the 

period December 27, 2004, through June 

30, 2006. 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 C.F.R. § 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 C.F.R. § 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: March 5, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–4497 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–908 

Notice of Correction of Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty Investigation: 

Sodium Hexametaphosphate from the 

People’s Republic of China 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin 

C. Begnal or Christopher D. Riker, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1442 or (202) 482–

3441, respectively. 

CORRECTION: 

On March 6, 2007, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

the notice of initiation of the 

antidumping duty investigation of 

sodium hexametaphosphate from the 

People’s Republic of China. See 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty 

Investigation: Sodium 

Hexametaphosphate from the People’s 

Republic of China, 72 FR 9926 (March 

6, 2007) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

Subsequent to the signature of the 

Initiation Notice, we identified an 

inadvertent error in the above–

referenced notice. 

Specifically, the case number listed in 

the Initiation Notice was incorrect. It 

should read A–570–908. 

Conclusion 

This notice serves solely to correct the 

case number as it was listed in the 

Initiation Notice. The Department’s 

findings in the Initiation Notice remain 

unchanged. This notice is issued and 

published in accordance with section 

777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended. 

Dated: March 6, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–4501 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES