alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 54701.

#### Fred H. Lowenstein *v.*United States,

protest 154075-K (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the case was called for hearing there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff, and it was thereupon ordered to be dismissed by the court. The protest was therefore dismissed.
#### Lydia Camacho, Respondent, v Ezras Yisrael, Inc., Defendant, and 1st Avenue Quality Market, Inc., Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 90]

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about June 7, 1995, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied where the deposition testimony of appellant’s own employee established that both he and a co-employee conducted snow removal operations on the sidewalk in front of the store on days when it snowed immediately prior to plaintiff’s fall, including the morning of the accident. Defendant failed to demonstrate entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, as material issues of fact exist as to whether defendant’s snow removal prior to plaintiff’s fall created a dangerous condition or increased the natural hazard *(see, Glick v City of New York,*139 AD2d 402). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Williams, JJ.
No. 52325.

protest 65866-K (San Francisco).

#### K. Sakai Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dried, unsalted fish the same in all material respects as that passed upon in Abstract 50242 the claim at *1%*cents per pound under paragraph 717 (c) was sustained.
**32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CFO**

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kimberly A. Springsteen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ Kimberly A. Springsteen                                                                                                 |   |   |  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--|
|  

 

 

Kimberly A. SpringsteenPrincipal Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2006

 

 

 

  |
No. 64882.

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/25392, etc. (Portland, Maine).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks *371the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL JAMES LONGORIO,

Plaintiff,

v.

B. JACOT, et al.,

Defendants.

2:04-cv-2650 DFL KJM P

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ FIRST REQUEST

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, defendants are granted an additional

forty-five (45) days up to and including May 23, 2006, within which to file a responsive pleading

to the amended complaint.

DATED: April 12, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM Document 14 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 1
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3 v. No. A-1-CA-36150 4 BRIAN DALY, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY 7 Matthew E. Chandler, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 Andrea Rowley, Assistant Attorney General 11 Clovis, NM 12 for Appellee 13 Harmon Barnett Morris, P.C. 14 Tye C. Harmon 15 Clovis, NM 16 for Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 HANISEE, Judge. 192 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for th e reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED. 3

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4

5 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7

8 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge 9

10 HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge 11
No. 61390.

protest 23462-K (Los Angeles).

#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. *S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or *Prime Fur Corp.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
Before the Third Division,

September 6, 1944

No. 49697.

#### Protests 104209-K, etc., of Banco Nacionale De Mexico (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel outlining a method for determining the length of staple and the tare, the protests were sustained as to certain of the bales in accordance with a subsequent stipulation entered into after examination of all bales had been completed and as set out in schedules attached to stipulation.
EXHIBIT  32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Stephen M. Siedow, the Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer of Vizario, Inc. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY, that:

     1.   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
          31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 28th day of January, 2005.

                            By   /s/ Stephen M. Siedow
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                     Stephen M. Siedow, Chief Executive Officer,
                                     President and Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Vizario, Inc. and will be retained by Vizario, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.18 


 


 


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO 


 


MMA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC


2012 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION
PLAN


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO MMA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC 2012 NON-EMPLOYEE
DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION PLAN is adopted as of the 12th day of March, 2015.


 


1.            Specific Amendments.
The following amendments are hereby made to the Plan:


 


		(a)	All references to Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLC contained in the Plan shall be amended to
reflect the September 29, 2014 name change to MMA Capital Management, LLC.



 


		(b)	Section 2(o) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:



 


“Total Annual
Compensation” shall be determined as follows:


 


		i.	“Base Compensation”. Base Compensation shall be $60,000.00 per annum, payable quarterly;
and



 


		ii.	“Chairperson Compensation”. In addition to the Base Compensation, an additional fee
is payable quarterly to any director that serves as chairperson of the Board, or chairperson of any of the designated committees
of the Board. The additional fees are as follows:



 


		1.	Chairperson of the Board - $20,000 per annum



 


		2.	Audit Committee - $15,000.00 per annum



 


		3.	Governance Committee - $10,000.00 per annum



 


		4.	Compensation Committee - $10,000.00 per annum



 


The Board may
amend the amounts in this Section from time to time, in its sole discretion, subject to the Company’s Operating Agreement,
By-laws, and applicable law.


 


2.            Definitions.
All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Plan.


 


3.            No Other Amendments.
Except as modified herein, the Plan remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


 


Adopted by the Board: March 12, 2015


 




    	E-3
No. 66869.

#### Bert Scheuer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/20917 and 59/34483 (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No

. 04 -1 0- 00 10 0- CR Valer ie Ann HER

NA ND EZ , Appellant

v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the 226th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CR-0531 Honora ble Sid L . Har le, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice

Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Deliver ed and F iled: March 10, 2010 DI SMI SSED Appellant has f

iled a motion to dism iss this appea l by withdrawing her notice of a ppeal. The motion is g rante d and this appea l is dism issed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a). PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4345]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-540-002]

High Island Offshore System, L.L.C.; Notice of Tariff Filing

March 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 28, 2007, High Island Offshore System, 
L.L.C. (HIOS) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to its 
filing, to become effective March 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4345 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1434

ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. RATIONALWIKI FOUNDATION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O’ Grady , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv
- 00257

- LO

- TCB )

Submitted : August 24, 2017 Decided: August 28, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Alexander Otis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Alexander Otis Matthews appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ma tthews v.
RationalWIKI Found. , No. 1:14

- cv
- 00257

- LO

- TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 24 , 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) CASE NO. 2:04-cv-1955 MCE PAN

the STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

ex rel MIKE STIERLI, )

)

Relator Plaintiff, ) ORDER APPROVING TIME

) EXTENSION FOR DISCOVERY AND 

) DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES

)

v. )

)

SHASTA SERVICES, INC. dba )

TIMBERWORKS; and DOES 1 )

through 50, inclusive, )

)

Qui Tam Defendants. )

______________________________)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

The due date for the completion of Discovery is extended (by two months) to April 6,

2006. The due date for the disclosures of Expert Witnesses is extended (by two months) to

May 2, 2006. 

DATED: January 6, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01955-MCE -PAN Document 42 Filed 01/09/06 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**RacineSouth quadrangle, Wisconsin : 7.5-minute series
 
2010|2013|
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.81:42087-F 7-TF-024/
Item Number:0619-M-49 (online)
CGP systemNumber:00787877
March 19, 2019
#### People, Respondent, v Thomas P. Moore, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 546]

—Motion for reargument denied. All concur except Wesley, J., who dissents and votes to grant reargument and, upon reargument, to vacate the order of this Court entered June 9, 1995 (216 AD2d 902) and affirm the judgment *(see, Victor v Nebraska,*511 US 1). Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WATERKEEPERS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2647 KJM

vs.

RUTH COLEMAN, 

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Defendants have filed an ex parte application for an extension of time to respond

to discovery. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants are granted an

additional thirty days to respond to plaintiff’s request for production of documents, set one, and 

requests for admissions, set one. 

DATED: December 9, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

waterkeepers.eot

Case 2:04-cv-02647-KJM Document 26 Filed 12/09/05 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5723] 

*Summary:*                     Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 (68 FR 19875), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Richard Serra Sculpture: Forty Years”, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about June 3, 2007, until on or about September 10, 2007, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*For Further Information Contact:*                     For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julianne Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.                 

 Dated: March 5, 2007. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

 [FR Doc. E7-4658 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL McCEE FOUNTAIN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2350 GEB DAD P

vs.

JAMES YATES, Warden, et al., 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

The pro se petitioner seeks to add an exhibit to his traverse. The proposed exhibit

is a three-page document titled “State of California Department of Finance Race/Ethnic

Population Changes: Components of Change for California Counties, April 1990 to July 1999.”

Petitioner previously submitted the proposed exhibit as an attachment to a letter

addressed to the clerk of the court. Petitioner was directed to file a motion establishing the

identity and authenticity of the document and demonstrating that the document should be

included in the record. (See Order filed June 28, 2005, at 1-2.) In compliance with the court’s

order, petitioner filed a motion to expand the record. The court directed the parties to brief the

motion. (See Order filed Sept. 15, 2005, at 2.)

In opposition to petitioner’s motion, respondents contend that the census report

proffered by petitioner is not relevant to petitioner’s Strickland/Batson claim that defense counsel

Case 2:04-cv-02350-GEB-DAD Document 36 Filed 05/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

provided ineffective assistance by failing to challenge the jury pool and that, if anything, the

document supports the state court’s rejection of petitioner’s claim. In reply, petitioner argues that

the court may permit the expansion of the record to include his proposed exhibit because it

relates to the petition and may eliminate unnecessary hearings.

The court may permit the expansion of the record in a habeas proceeding to

include “additional materials relating to the petition.” Rule 7(a), Fed. R. Governing § 2254

Cases. The court may require that such materials be authenticated, and the court must give the

opposing party an opportunity to admit or deny the correctness of the materials. Rule 7(a) and

(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. The census report proffered by petitioner appears to

constitute material “relating to the petition.” The court will permit petitioner to expand the

record to include the census report as Exhibit I to his traverse.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s July 27, 2005 motion to expand the record is granted;

2. The exhibit attached to petitioner’s July 27, 2005 motion is deemed Exhibit I

to petitioner’s traverse filed March 14, 2005;

3. Petitioner’s January 24, 2006 request for emergency expedition is denied as

moot in light of the order of the United States Court of Appeals filed in this case on April 21,

2006; and

4. Petitioner’s May 2, 2006 request for judicial notice of the April 21, 2006 order

is denied as unnecessary.

DATED: May 4, 2006.

DAD:13

foun2350.mexprec

Case 2:04-cv-02350-GEB-DAD Document 36 Filed 05/04/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 63128.

#### Hall Brothers *v.*United States,

protest 58/19490 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<SEQUENCE>6
<FILENAME>ims20065cfo906ex32-2.txt

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
                         Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350

                                   ----------

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of INTERNATIONAL MONETARY
SYSTEMS, LTS. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
(the "Report"), I, Danny W Weibling, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Danny W Weibling
-----------------------------
Danny W Weibling
Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2007