alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4520 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4520

 To require the Director of National Intelligence to prepare and make 
    available a report on the wealth and corrupt activities of the 
   leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2024

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
            referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Director of National Intelligence to prepare and make 
    available a report on the wealth and corrupt activities of the 
   leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Confronting Chinese Communist Party 
Malign Influence Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON WEALTH AND CORRUPT ACTIVITIES OF THE LEADERSHIP OF 
              THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall, in 
consultation with the Secretary of State, prepare and make available to 
the public an unclassified report on the wealth and corrupt activities 
of the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, including the General 
Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party and senior leadership 
officials in the Central Committee, the Politburo, the Politburo 
Standing Committee, and any other regional Party Secretaries.
    (b) Hearing Requirement.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence, or 
the Director's designee, shall appear before the Permanent Select 
Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the 
Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate to present testimony in 
an open hearing regarding the findings of the report required under 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4576 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4576

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies 
  Appropriations Act, 2015, to reauthorize the Colorado River System 
                      conservation pilot program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Colorado River Basin System 
Conservation Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM CONSERVATION PILOT 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 206 of the Energy and Water Development and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015 (43 U.S.C. 620 note; Public Law 113-
235), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``this Act'' and 
        inserting ``the Colorado River Basin System Conservation 
        Extension Act'';
            (2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ``2024'' and 
        inserting ``2026''; and
            (3) in subsection (d), by striking ``2025'' and inserting 
        ``2027''.

            Passed the Senate December 18 (legislative day, December 
      16), 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4576

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies 
  Appropriations Act, 2015, to reauthorize the Colorado River System 
                      conservation pilot program.
```
**Exhibit 23.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS VALUATIONEXPERTS**

 

March 16, 2006

 

Witness Systems, Inc.300 Colonial Center ParkwayRoswell, Georgia 30076

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We herebyconsent to the use of the name Taylor Consulting Group, Inc. and of referencesto Taylor Consulting Group, Inc. and to the inclusion of and references toour reports, or information contained therein, dated March 31, 2003 andJanuary 24, 2005 prepared for Witness Systems, Inc. in the Annual Reporton Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 
| Sincerely,                          |
|-------------------------------------|
| Taylor  Consulting Group, Inc. |
|                                |
| /s/ MICHAEL  HALLIWELL              |   |
|                                |
| Michael  Halliwell                  |
| Managing  Director                  |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**     I, Paul A. Lang, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Arch Western Resources, LLC;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved.]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     /s/ Paul A. Lang     Paul A. Lang  PresidentDate:May 14, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Hayes, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 565]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered March 5, 1993, convicting him of kidnapping in the first degree and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial (Santagata, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which sought to suppress his statement to the police.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, *Payton v New York*(445 US 573), is inapplicable to arrests made outside of his home in his yard *(see, People v Roe,*73 NY2d 1004; *People v Keller,*148 AD2d 958).

The defendant’s contention that his statement was involuntary is without merit. Although the defendant was interviewed by police officers for as many as nine hours following his arrest, he was promptly read his *Miranda*rights, he was not subjected to continuous interrogation, and he was not denied sleep or food when requested, prior to obtaining his confession *(see, People v Jackson,*178 AD2d 851).

The off-the-record *pre-Sandoval*conference before the defendant appeared in court did not require the defendant’s pres*469ence. The record indicates that the defendant was given a meaningful opportunity to participate in the discussion of the *Sandoval*issues when he was later produced *(see, People v Hailey,*221 AD2d 466; *People v Swift,*213 AD2d 355; *People v Watson,*205 AD2d 398).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, are without merit. Joy, J. P., Hart, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v EFRAIN J. CRUZ, JR., Private U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

No. 28,909

November 29, 1974

*Major D. A. Higley,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel P. N. Kress,*USMC, *Captain Joseph W Diver,*USMCR, and *Lieutenant Commander Harvey K Little,*JAGC, USN, were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Quinn, Judge:

With others, the accused and Williams, members of the same company, were involved in an incident that resulted in their separate prosecution for several offenses in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The day before the accused’s trial by a general court-martial, convened by the base commander, Williams entered into a pretrial agreement with the battalion commander, which provided, in material part, for trial of the charges against him by special court-martial and that he would testify for the Government against the accused.

Williams testified for the Government at the accused’s trial, which resulted in findings of guilty. In his review of the record, the staff judge advocate called attention to the agreement between Williams and the battalion commander, who was the subordinate of the base commander, but indicated that the latter was "in no way preclud[ed]” by the agreement from acting as reviewing authority in the accused’s case. Apparently, the staff judge advocate was not aware of our contrary determination in a similar situation in United States v Dickerson, 22 USCMA 489, 47 CMR 790 (1973), which had been decided about 2 months before the accused’s case came before him.

The record indicates Williams testified in regard to only one of the several offenses of which the accused was convicted. If that offense were eliminated and the sentence appropriately reassessed, the accused would receive a full measure of relief. Accordingly, the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General for resubmission to the Court of Military Review. In its discretion, the court can set aside the convening authority’s action and direct review of the record by another competent authority, or it can set aside the findings of guilty of the specification as to which Williams testified (specification 1, Charge I), dismiss that specification and reassess the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty, with due regard to the probable impact of the dismissed offense on the court members in the imposition of sentence at trial.

Judge Cook and Senior Judge Ferguson concur.
(Reap. Dec. 10098)

#### Automatic Vulcanizers Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 842488, etc.

(Decided November 6, 1961)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*William, H. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule have been limited to the merchandise described on the several invoices as “Deckendoktoren,” with or without qualifying words and with or without symbols. Counsel for the parties have submitted the said appeals for decision upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and as it existed prior to the amendment thereof by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of such merchandise, and that such value, in each instance, is the invoice unit value, plus 20 per centum, plus packing.

As to all merchandise, other than that described as above on the invoices, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Case 2:04-cv-02082-GEB -KJM   Document 12    Filed 09/14/05   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-02082-GEB -KJM   Document 12    Filed 09/14/05   Page 2 of 2

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-26T23:56:45-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 64905.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/8912 (Seattle).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Charles E. Drimal, Jr.
|Chief Executive Officer   
|April 15, 2010
ex10_31.htm


 Exhibit 10.31






ANTHERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


Deferred Compensation Election Form


 








	
  

	
I.

	
Elective Deferral Percentages







As specified below, I elect pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Agreement entered into by Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) and me as of the 23rd day of December, 2014  (the “Deferred Compensation Agreement”) to defer receipt of that percentage of my Eligible Compensation which would otherwise be paid to me for services during 2015 (with respect to compensation earned with respect to services to be performed by me subsequent to the date of this election) and subsequent calendar years:


 


 



	 Deferral Percentage:	
Base Annual Salary:    

	10%
	 	Annual Bonus:     	25%





                                 


I understand that this election is irrevocable for 2015 and that unless and until this election is changed prospectively for future calendar years on a new election form before those years begin, this election shall continue as shown above for all subsequent calendar years.  Capitalized terms used in this election will have the meaning given such terms in the Deferred Compensation Agreement.


 



	
  

	
II.

	
Form and Timing of Payment of Account







I understand that my Account will be paid to me upon the first to occur of the dates specified in Section 3 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement and that I may specify a date for subsection (i) of such Section 3.  The date I specify for subsection (i) of Section 3 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement is January 1st, 2017.  I understand that if I do not specify a date, that the Account will be paid to me upon the first to occur of the dates/events specified in subsections (ii) through (v) of Section 3 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement.  At the End of the Deferral Period, my Account will be paid as specified in Section 4 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement, subject to the requirements of Section 8 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement.


 


I understand that any amounts deferred by this election and any other amounts deferred by me pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Agreement shall be credited to a bookkeeping account established for me by the Company and that any segregation of Company assets intended to satisfy the obligations of the Company under the Deferred Compensation Agreement shall not confer a beneficial ownership interest on me and any such assets shall remain subject to the claims of the general creditors of the Company in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Company.


 


 


 


Executed on the date specified below.


 


 





 



	                                                            	December 23rd, 2014
	
Executive:  Paul F. Truex

	

Date




	
Title: Chief Executive Officer

	
 







 


Receipt of Form by Company







                                                       


Received by:  _____________________________________________


 


Title:  SVP, Finance & Administration, Principal Accounting Officer


Date signed:  December 31st, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Jaclyn,
Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,176
<SECURITIES>                                     2,735
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                       483
<INVENTORY>                                      8,077
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,632
<PP&E>                                           1,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,917
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,369
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,572
<SALES>                                         68,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,509
<CGS>                                           51,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,822
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        67
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT CHRISTINA MARTINEZ and FERNANDO GALVAN,

Petitioners,

v. L. A 360 INVESTMENT LLC; AUDREY DEWEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of

Ray Dewey, deceased, Respondents. No. 2D23-420 September 1, 2023 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Susan G. Barthle, Judge. Brent Buckman, Port St. Lucie, for Petitioners. Chelsea Waller-Douthard, of Waller Law, Dade City, for Respondent Audrey Dewey, No appearance for Respondent L. A 360 Investment LLC.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed. CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Order entered July 7 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00022
- CV ROBERT PERRY, II & A LL OCCUPANTS, Appellant s V. FEDERAL NATIONAL MOR TGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Da llas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 13
- 05355
- D



### O RDER The reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By order dated April 7, 2014, we ordered appellants to file (1) notice that appellants had requested preparation of the reporter’s record, and (2 ) written verification that appellants had paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record or written documentation that appellants have been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellants that failure to comply wit h the order by April 18, 2014 would result in the case being submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and appellants have not provided the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court re garding the status of the reporter’s record.Therefore, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. Appellants’

brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE