alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

             CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 16 - GLOBAL INCORPORATED

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corporate Property Associates
16-Global Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Gordon F. DuGan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Gordon F. DuGan
    -------------------------
    Gordon F. DuGan
    Vice Chairman and
    Chief Executive Officer

        5/10/2005
    ----------------
    Date

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
3, 2003, except for Note 19, as to which the date is March 10, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation, and our report included in the
following paragraph with respect to financial statement schedules, in the
following Registration Statements:

        Form S-8, Nos. 2-36778, 2-56410, 33-30530, and 333-101091 pertaining to
        the Long Term Stock Incentive Plan and predecessor stock plans, and
        outstanding effective registration statements on Form S-16 included in
        certain such S-8 filings;

        Form S-8, No. 33-56369, pertaining to the JP Teamshare Plan and
        Guarantee Thrift Savings Plan and Trust;

        Form S-8, Nos. 33-64137, and 333-109090, pertaining to the Non-Employee
        Directors' Stock Option Plan.

     Our audit also included the financial statement schedules of
Jefferson-Pilot Corporation listed in Item 15. These schedules are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedules
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 26, 2003

                                       E-4
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 23

- 2654 LT Case No. 2020

- CF

- 002616

- A

_____________________________
M ARCUS D WIGHT R IVERS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark Borello , Judge

. Marcus Dwight Rivers , Moore Haven , pro se

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert Charles Lee
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

November 7, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

L AMBERT , S OUD , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of i-CABLE Communications Limited (the Company) on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



By:

/s/    STEPHEN T. H.
NGName:

Stephen T. H. NgTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/    William J. H. KwanName:

William J. H. KwanTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


Date: June 29, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
No. 51736.

#### Protests 867464-G, etc., of Perrin Cooper & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of goatskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros., Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW L. CARVER 

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES RATHLESBERGER; RON

JOSEPH; DAVE THORNTON; and DOES

3 through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

CIV-S-04-1918 DFL PAN

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION 

AND ORDER

Plaintiff Andrew L. Carver (“Carver”) moves for a new trial. 

Because there was no trial in this case, the court construes

Carver’s motion as a motion for relief from judgment and a

request to amend his complaint to plead diversity jurisdiction. 

For the reasons stated at oral argument, the court GRANTS

Carver’s request to amend his complaint to plead diversity

jurisdiction. Carver shall file an amended complaint by February

24, 2006 that expressly pleads diversity jurisdiction, including

the residence of plaintiff and defendants as well as how the 

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-01918-RRB-EFB Document 25 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

amount in controversy requirement is met. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:2/6/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01918-RRB-EFB Document 25 Filed 02/06/06 Page 2 of 2
#### Nora Doherty et al., Respondents, v Town of Orange-town, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 526]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), entered April 11, 1994, which denied its motion for summary judgment, and (2) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court entered September 6, 1994, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination denying summary judgment.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered April 11, 1994, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered September 6, 1994, made upon reargument; and it is further,

*311Ordered that the order entered September 6, 1994, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The plaintiffs were injured when the car in which they were driving hit an icy patch on a roadway known as Erie Street which was owned and maintained by the Town of Orangetown. The Town moved pursuant to Town Law § 65-a for summary judgment on the basis of lack of prior written notice of the icy condition. The Supreme Court denied the motion, and, upon reargument, adhered to the denial, finding that the plaintiffs had set forth triable issues of fact, i.e., whether the hazardous condition was related to a drainage problem of which the Town had both actual and constructive knowledge, and which the Town may have caused through defectively-made repairs.

We affirm. Town Law § 65-a requires prior written notice of a hazardous condition created by the existence of snow or ice on a roadway or bridge. The failure to prove that the Town had such written notice and refused to act to rectify the danger within a reasonable time is a complete bar to such an action *(see,*Town Law § 65-a [1]; *Ritacco v Town/ Village of Harrison,*105 AD2d 834). However, where the mere existence or the failure of the Town to remove snow or ice is not the sole issue, the existence of the hazardous condition for such a period of time that the Town should have discovered and remedied the situation excuses the prior notice requirement under the terms of the statute *(see,*Town Law § 65-a [1]).

Moreover, it is well settled that where a Town has created the hazardous condition, there is no need to prove prior written notice *(see, Meyer v Town of Brookhaven,*204 AD2d 699; *Palkovic v Town of Brookhaven,*166 AD2d 566; *Humes v Town of Hempstead,*166 AD2d 503).

The Supreme Court correctly determined that a trial is required because the affidavit of the plaintiffs’ expert and the examination before trial of the foreman of the Town’s highway department constitute sufficient evidence to create issues of fact with respect to whether the Town had constructive or actual knowledge, and whether the Town created the hazardous condition. Summary judgment was therefore properly denied. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit
Fund VI, L.P., Series 12 (the  "Partnership") for the quarter ended December 31,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
   respects,  the  financial   condition  and  result  of  operations   of   the
   Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 14, 2006
(Reap. Dec. 9521)

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 3102.

(Decided October 13, 1959)

*Lawrence £ Tuttle (E&ward N. Glad of*counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doiib,*Assistant Attorney General *(Sheila N. Ziff,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement of a gang-saw machine and parts entered at the port of Portland, Oreg., on June 1, 1955.

*506When this case was called for trial, counsel for the respective parties stated:

> Me. Glad: I offer to stipulate, your Honor, that the merchandise involved herein consists of one Linck Gangsaw, Model K 45, and parts, exported from Germany during March of 1955, and that during the period in question the export value of such or similar merchandise, as defined by Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, was $5,315, less consular fee of $2.50, packed.

> I further offer to stipulate that during the period in question the foreign value of such or similar merchandise, as defined by Section 402, was no higher.

> Mes. Ziff: Upon the advice of the Appraiser concerned, we so stipulate.

In view of this stipulation, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the Linck Gangsaw, Model K 45, and parts involved herein, and that such value is $5,315, less consular fee of $2.50, packed.

Judgment will he rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 6

CONSENT OF APPOINTED ACTUARY

I consent
to the use and incorporation by reference of the following report in this Annual Form 40-F of Sun Life Financial Inc.:

My report dated February 11,
2015 on the valuation of the policy liabilities of Sun Life Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries for its Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at December 31, 2014 and their change in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
year December 31, 2014, in accordance with accepted actuarial practice, including selection of appropriate assumptions and methods.

Dated
February 11, 2015



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/S/ Larry Madge                      
|                                       
|Larry Madge                            
|                                       
|Fellow, Canadian Institute of Actuaries
|Toronto, Canada
7/21/2015 Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­1467

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­1467

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Tuesday, July 21, 2015 12:04 PM

To: Ronnie@4forksmedia.com

Dear Mr. Krupa:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA­2015­1467).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required

by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual

and remove closed‐set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by

the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/4/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267­4264.

Dan Ngo

FAA Office of Rulemaking
##### 



U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 40-F
 o
    
    REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934ORþ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(a) OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
    
    Commission File Number 001-15014
 Sun Life Financial Inc.
  Canada
 52411
 Not Applicable
 150 King Street West, 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 1J9 (416) 979-4800
 Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada  U.S. Operations Holdings, Inc.
One Sun Life Executive Park
Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts 02481
(781) 237-6030
  Title of each class
    
    Name of each exchange on which registeredCommon Shares
    
    New York Stock Exchange
  Not Applicable
  Not Applicable




---



##### 



þ     Annual information form
    
    þ     Audited annual financial statements
  Common Shares
    
    
    581,960,570Class A Preferred Shares Series 1
    
    
    13,000,000Class A Preferred Shares Series 2
    
    
    16,000,000Class A Preferred Shares Series 3
    
    
    10,000,000
  Yes     o
    
    No     þ
  Yes     þ
    
    No     o
 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
 Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 Identification of Audit Committee
 DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS  Audit and Conduct
Review Committee
 Audit Committee Financial Expert
 DIRECTORS AND
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS  Audit and Conduct
Review Committee .
 Code of Ethics
 CODE OF ETHICS




---



##### 



Principal Accountant Fees and Services
 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 FINANCIAL POSITION AND LIQUIDITY  Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
 Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
 FINANCIAL POSITION AND LIQUIDITY  Contractual
Obligations
 UNDERTAKING
  SIGNATURES
  Registrant
    Sun Life Financial Inc.By (Signature and Title)
    /s/ Thomas A. BogartThomas A. BogartDate
    Executive Vice-President and
Chief Legal Officer 
February 13, 2006




---



##### 



EXHIBITS
 1.
    
    Consolidated Financial Statement for the Year Ended December 31, 20052.
    
    Annual Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 20053.
    
    Renewal Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 20054.
    
    Sun Life Financial Code of Business Conduct5.
    
    Auditors Consent6.
    
    Report on Comments by Auditors on Canada  United States of America Reporting Differences7.
    
    Consent of Appointed Actuary8.
    
    Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of United States Code, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002
 
    
    Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
 9.
    
    Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
    
    Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP05-157-006] 

Take notice that on February 28, 2007, Saltville Gas Storage Company L.L.C. (Saltville) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, reflecting an effective date of April 1, 2007: 

Original Sheet No. 15 

Original Sheet No.16 

Original Sheet No. 17 

Original Sheet No. 18 

Sheet Nos. 19-30

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-4344 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

GAYDA AIRTH, CIV-S-04-2536-DFL/GGH

PATRICIA M. KEANE, CIV-S-04-2537-DFL/GGH

JACK STEVENSON, CIV-S-04-2538-DFF/GGH

ANDREW CARELTON, CIV-S-04-2539-DFL/GGH

Plaintiff(s),

vs. 

THOMPSON FINANCIAL CO., INC.,

THE THOMPSON CORPORATION a

Corporation, and does 1 -5, inclusive,

Defendant(s).

______________________________________/

 Defendant filed a discovery motion on June 8, 2005 set for hearing June 30,

2005 @ 10:00 a.m.. Notwithstanding the three days specified by E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-251 the joint

statement shall be filed in no later than five court days before the scheduled hearing.

Notwithstanding E.D. Cal. L.R. 5-133(f), if the joint statement is more than 25 pages, or the

attachments are longer than 50 pages, the copy shall be hand delivered or sent by overnight mail

to chambers on the day of filing. The filing deadline, accordingly, will be June 23, 2005.

The dispute may be organized by category, with specific discovery items attached,

if appropriate, as an exhibit. For each disputed category or individual item, include: (1) the

specific disputed discovery category or item; (2) the response; (3) the moving party’s position;

and (4) the opposition. E.D.Cal. L.R. 37-251(c)(3). Do not file separate briefing. Id.

Privilege objections must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5). Except in

extraordinary circumstances, the party claiming privilege may not submit a post-hearing privilege

log. The failure properly to support a privilege objection with a privilege log may be deemed to

waive it. 

The moving party is responsible for filing the joint statement. The opposing party

nevertheless must timely draft and submit its portion. Failure of either party to use best efforts to

ensure timely filing will be cause for sanctions. 

Dated: 6/13/05 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 ___________________________________

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

U.S. Magistrate Judge

airth.ord

Case 2:04-cv-02538-DFL-GGH Document 8 Filed 06/14/05 Page 1 of 1