alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jose Larraceleta et al., Appellants, v Darling-Delaware Company, Inc., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[633 NYS2d 1012]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), dated May 9, 1994, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) a judgment of the same court, dated June 10, 1994, entered upon the order.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see,*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

In order to state a prima facie case of negligence, the plaintiffs must demonstrate that the defendant created the condition which caused the injury or that it had actual or constructive notice of the condition *(see, Capitelli v KingKullen Grocery Co.,*207 AD2d 325; *Batiancela v Staten Is. Mall,*189 AD2d 743). Here, even if we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiffs, such a demonstration was not made. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.
Case No. 8,447.

#### LOCKHART v. ROSS.

[Cited in Tunstall v. Worthington, Case No. 14.-239. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
Exhibit 10.66


 


Summary Translation of Sample Supply
Contract


 


Note: The summary translation agreement below
is summary translation of one of a series of agreements between Yantai Zhisheng International Trade Co., Ltd. and Yantai Fuji Commerce
and Trade Co., Ltd. that the companies use that constitute separate agreements, yet all such agreements are nearly identical in
most respects, except for the specific term, price, and subject of the purchase or sale order (e.g., organic rice, pectins, etc.).


 


Party A: Yantai Zhisheng International
Trade Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Yantai Fuji Commerce and
Trade Co., Ltd.


 


Supply Date: 2012-06-01 to 2012-06-30


 


Products: organic rice


 


Party B is responsible for delivery of
products to Party A; Party A shall make 30% of payments in advance, the balance shall be cleared within 6 months.


 


Under the premise of Party B’s errorless
delivery, Party A shall pay Party B 5% of the total payment as liquidated damages if Party A calls a halt or receives similar products
elsewhere. If Party A fails to pay on the date stipulated in the contract, it shall pay Party B 0.3% of the total amount each day
as fine on a delay.


 


Any products that are not corresponding
to the contract shall be reduced at price if Party A agrees to utilize those products; any non-utilizable products shall be returned
to Party B for exchange; any delay due to related issue, Party B shall pay Party A 0.3% of the total payment as liquidated damages
on a delay.


 


Any price change will be based on the mutual
consent from both parties.


 


Any changes on quality, price, packaging,
etc. by Party B shall be negotiated with Party A five days in advance.


 


Neither party shall have the right to change
or revise the contract without authorization.


 


Any dispute between the parties shall be
brought up to local court.


 


Signed date: 2012-05-10
No. 57324.

protests 928441-G, etc. (New York).

#### A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*453Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480); that the items marked “D” consist of dogskins the same as those involved in *S. M. Brachman & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 153, C. D. 389); and that the items marked “G” consist of goatskins the same as those involved in *United States*v. *Winograd Bros., Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited decisions, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra,*only insofar as the items marked “A” are concerned.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-20624

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LESLIE LANG, also known as Leslie Lang-Reynolds,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-69-1

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leslie Lang pleaded guilty to one charge of conspiracy to commit wire

fraud and was sentenced to serve 24 months in prison and a three-year term of

supervised release. In this appeal, she argues that her plea was involuntary

because it was entered when she was in a state of extreme mental turmoil. The

Government contends that Lang has failed to show the district court erred by not

sua sponte holding a competency hearing. Our review of the record and

pertinent authority refutes Lang’s position and supports the Government’s.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 26, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-20624 Document: 00511646016 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2011
No. 10-20624

A defendant who contends that she was incompetent to plead guilty must

show that her alleged mental defect rendered her unable to consult with her

lawyer or to understand the proceedings against her. Godinez v. Moran, 509

U.S. 389, 396, 398-99 (1993). Lang has not made this showing. Although the

record arguably shows that she suffered from anxiety and mental illness, such

illness does not automatically render one legally incompetent. See Bouchillon

v. Collins, 907 F.2d 589, 593 (5th Cir. 1990).

Similarly, our review of the record and parties’ arguments does not show

that Lang exhibited irrational behavior or a demeanor indicative of

incompetency, and she did not produce a prior expert opinion addressing her

competence vel non. See United States v. Ruston, 565 F.3d 892, 902 (5th Cir.

2009). Consequently, Lang has not shown that the district court had reasonable

cause to believe that a competency hearing was needed or that it abused its

discretion by not sua sponte ordering such a hearing. See 18 U.S.C. § 4241(a);

Ruston, 565 F.3d at 901.

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-20624 Document: 00511646016 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2011
No. 52054.

#### Sears Roebuck & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 875896-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
EPA FORM 6100-4 (DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form) 

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program 

DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form 

This form is intended to capture the prime contractor’s actual and/or anticipated use of identified certified DBE1

subcontractors2 and the estimated dollar amount of each subcontract. An EPA Financial Assistance Agreement 

Recipient must require its prime contractors to complete this form and include it in the bid or proposal package. 

Prime contractors should also maintain a copy of this form on file. 

Prime Contractor Name Project Name

Bid/ Proposal No. Assistance Agreement ID No. (if known) Point of Contact

Address

Telephone No. Email Address

Issuing/Funding Entity:

I have identified potential DBE 

certified subcontractors ___ YES ___ NO

If yes, please complete the table below. If no, please explain:

Subcontractor Name/ 

Company Name

Company Address/ Phone/ Email Est. Dollar

Amt

Currently 

DBE

Certified?

1 A DBE is a Disadvantaged, Minority, or Woman Business Enterprise that has been certified by an entity from which EPA accepts certifications as 

described in 40 CFR 33.204-33.205 or certified by EPA. EPA accepts certifications from entities that meet or exceed EPA certification standards as 

described in 40 CFR 33.202. 

2 Subcontractor is defined as a company, firm, joint venture, or individual who enters into an agreement with a contractor to provide 

services pursuant to an EPA award of financial assistance. 

Continue on back if needed

OMB Control No: 2090-0030 

Approval Expires: XX/XX/XX
EPA FORM 6100-4 (DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form) 

OMB Control No: 

Approved: 

Approval Expires: 

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program 

DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form 

I certify under penalty of perjury that the forgoing statements are true and correct. Signing this form does not 

signify a commitment to utilize the subcontractors above. I am aware of that in the event of a replacement of a 

subcontractor, I will adhere to the replacement requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 33 Section 33.302 (c). 

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per 

response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, 

and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection 

techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send 

the completed form to this address.

Prime Contractor Signature Print Name

Title Date
No. 49700.

#### Protest 52333-K of Columbia Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

An examination showed there is no specific provision *281for dried nuts in paragraph 752. At the hearing a sample of the merchandise was received in evidence. This exhibit contains several samples which appear to be in the natural state, having thin separable rinds or shells and an internal meat and kernel, the meat being soft and having no indication of having been dried, but the shells are dry and brittle and break easily like the shell of an almond. The court stated that the exhibit seemed to conform with the definition of the word “nut.” From examination of the sample the court found that the merchandise is unshelled edible nuts which have not been subjected to any drying process other than that which occurs naturally. It was therefore held dutiable at *2%*cents per pound under paragraph 761, under the provision for “edible nuts, not specially provided for, not shelled,” as claimed. *Sun Kwong On*v. *United States,*T. D. 22461 (G. A. 4756) and Abstract 14685 followed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4984 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to require regulated persons to 

identify tableting machines and encapsulating machines by serial number. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. COONS, Mr. MORAN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Ms. 

CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to require regulated 

persons to identify tableting machines and encapsulating 

machines by serial number. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fight Illicit Pill Press5 es Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REGULATION OF CERTAIN MACHINES. 

7 (a) REGULATION.— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4984 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 310(a) of the Con2 trolled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 830(a)) is amend3 ed by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(4) Each regulated person who manufactures, dis5 tributes, delivers, sells, imports, or exports a tableting ma6 chine or an encapsulating machine shall identify the 

7 tableting machine or encapsulating machine by means of 

8 a serial number that is engraved, cast, or otherwise per9 manently affixed to a nonremovable part of the tableting 

10 machine or encapsulating machine.’’. 

11 (2) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days 

12 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney 

13 General shall promulgate regulations carrying out 

14 the amendments made by paragraph (1). 

15 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

16 by paragraph (1) shall apply only to any tableting 

17 machine or encapsulating machine manufactured, 

18 distributed, delivered, sold, imported, or exported 

19 after the effective date of the regulations promul20 gated under paragraph (2). 

21 (b) PROHIBITED ACTS.—Section 403(a) of the Con22 trolled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 843(a)) is amended— 

23 (1) in paragraph (8), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

24 end; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4984 IS

1 (2) in paragraph (9), by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting a semicolon; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(10) to remove, alter, or obliterate any serial 

5 number affixed to a tableting machine or encap6 sulating machine; or 

7 ‘‘(11) to transport, ship, receive, or possess any 

8 tableting machine or encapsulating machine that is 

9 required to have a serial number, knowing that the 

10 serial number has been removed, altered, or obliter11 ated.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2007041EN.01001001.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/10

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628 of 24 October 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to national regional investment aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 41/08)

| Aid No | XR 12/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | Border Midlands, West Region, Southern Region, Eastern Region (sine Dublin, Mid East sub-regions) |
| Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement | Regional Aid (Industry and Services) Scheme 2007-2013 |
| Legal basis | Industrial Development Acts 1986-2003
  Údarás na Gaeltachta Act 1979.
  Shannon Free Airport Development Company Limited Act, 1959 as amended |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Annual budget | EUR 80 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | 30 % |
| In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1.1.2007 |
| Duration | 31.12.2007 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for regional investment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | IDA Ireland |
| Wilton Park House |
| Wilton Place |
| Dublin 2 |
| Irland |
| Tel. (353-1) 603 40 00 |
| www.idaireland.com |

Aid No

XR 12/07

Member State

Ireland

Region

Border Midlands, West Region, Southern Region, Eastern Region (sine Dublin, Mid East sub-regions)

sine

Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement

Regional Aid (Industry and Services) Scheme 2007-2013

Legal basis

Industrial Development Acts 1986-2003

Údarás na Gaeltachta Act 1979.

Shannon Free Airport Development Company Limited Act, 1959 as amended

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Annual budget

EUR 80 million

Maximum aid intensity

30 %

In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1.1.2007

Duration

31.12.2007

Economic sectors

All sectors eligible for regional investment aid

Name and address of the granting authority

IDA Ireland

Wilton Park House

Wilton Place

Dublin 2

Irland

Tel. (353-1) 603 40 00

www.idaireland.com

| Enterprise Ireland |
| --- |
| Glasnevin |
| Dublin 9 |
| Irland |
| Tel. (353-1) 808 20 00 |
| www.enterprise-ireland.com |

Enterprise Ireland

Glasnevin

Dublin 9

Irland

Tel. (353-1) 808 20 00

www.enterprise-ireland.com

| Údarás na Gaeltachta |
| --- |
| Na Forbacha |
| Co na Gaillimhe |
| Tel. (353-91) 50 31 00 |
| www.udaras.ie |

Údarás na Gaeltachta

Na Forbacha

Co na Gaillimhe

Tel. (353-91) 50 31 00

www.udaras.ie

Internet address of the publication of the aid scheme

www.entemp.ie/enterprise/stateaid/

Other information

—

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 16  GLOBAL INCORPORATED
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Corporate Property Associates 16-Global
Incorporated;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 8/14/2006
    
    /s/ Gordon F. DuGanDate
    
    Gordon F. DuGanChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4409]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. OST-2003-15660]


Notice of Request for Renewal of a Currently Approved Information 
Collection

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary published a document in the 
Federal Register on February 14, 2007, concerning a request for a 
renewal of a currently approved information collection. We are 
correcting the document as set forth below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vivian Jones, Office of the 
Secretary, Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-0283.

Correction

    In the February 14, 2007, Federal Register [72 FR 7110-7111] 
correct the Estimated total burden on respondents. And add the Average 
Annual Burden per respondent to read:
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 26.
    Total Annual Response: 1380.
    Estimated Total Burden on Respondents: 4789.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 5, 2007.
John DiLuccio,
Director, Resource Directorate.
 [FR Doc. E7-4409 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
# C_2007016EN.01000101.xml

| 24.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 16/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 11.12.2006 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 660/06 |
| Member State | Slovakia |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Individuálna pomoc periodiku „Kalligram“ |
| Legal basis | a) | Zákon č. 523/2004 Z. z. o rozpočtových pravidlách verejnej správy a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov, |

Date of adoption of the decision

11.12.2006

Reference number of the aid

N 660/06

Member State

Slovakia

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Individuálna pomoc periodiku „Kalligram“

Legal basis

a)

Zákon č. 523/2004 Z. z. o rozpočtových pravidlách verejnej správy a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov,

| b) | Zákon č. 231/1999 Z. z. o štátnej pomoci v znení zákona č. 203/2004 – § 4 ods. 1, písm. d), |
| --- | --- |

b)

Zákon č. 231/1999 Z. z. o štátnej pomoci v znení zákona č. 203/2004 – § 4 ods. 1, písm. d),

| c) | Výnos Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky č. MK-2165/2006-110/6075, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa výnos MK SR č. MK-12947/05-110/30493 o poskytovaní dotácií v pôsobnosti Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky |
| --- | --- |

c)

Výnos Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky č. MK-2165/2006-110/6075, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa výnos MK SR č. MK-12947/05-110/30493 o poskytovaní dotácií v pôsobnosti Ministerstva kultúry Slovenskej republiky

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Culture

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: SKK 1,3 million;

Intensity

64 %

Duration

1.1.2006-31.12.2006

Economic sectors

Media

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministerstvo kultúry SR |
| --- |
| Nám. SNP 33 |
| SK-813 31 Bratislava |

Ministerstvo kultúry SR

Nám. SNP 33

SK-813 31 Bratislava

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---