alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 58599.

protest 144162-K (Los Angeles).

#### Pacific Overseas Corp. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the linoleum the subject of *United States*v. *Pacific Overseas Co., W. J. Byrnes & Co.*(42 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 559), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**DISCLOSURE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS REPORT**
Management of Sun Life Financial Services of Canada Inc. (the Company),including its Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, haveevaluated the effectiveness of the Company ‘s disclosure controls andprocedures as of December 31, 2002 (the “Evaluation Date”) and have concludedthat these disclosure controls and procedures were operating effectively in theaggregate.
During 2002, the Company’s United States operations were involved inintegrating the business operations arising from the acquisition of KeyportLife Insurance Company (Keyport). Keyport’s internal controls did not meet theCompany’s standards, particularly with respect to account reconciliations, andcorrective action was undertaken. There has been a significant improvement inthis regard, but the corrective action is not yet complete.
The Company’s Canadian operations are currently involved in integrating thebusiness operations arising from the acquisition of Clarica Life InsuranceCompany (“Clarica”). This integration is designed to combine operationalstrengths through selecting the best processes from the organisations that arebeing integrated. Both had appropriate internal control processes in place atthe commencement of the integration. During the integration of Clarica, therehave been, and will continue to be, significant changes in internal controls.These changes are being managed through the development, execution andmonitoring of comprehensive integration plans. Furthermore, the businessenvironment in which this integration is occurring is also subject to constantchange.
Although the Company’s Canadian operations are currently undergoing anintegration, we are not aware of any significant changes in the Company’sinternal controls or in other factors that could significantly adversely affectthe Company’s internal controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date, nor havethere been any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies ormaterial weaknesses since the Evaluation Date, other than the continuing workon Keyport referred to above.
EXHIBIT 10.2



|BDO Audiberia Juan Bravo, 3-B 28006 Madrid España
|-------------------------------------------------





TERRA NETWORKS



Sociedad Anónima



Calle Nicaragua, No. 54

08029 Barcelona, Spain



---



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



---





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Terra Networks,
S.A. on Form S-8 listed below of our report dated January 31, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Terra Networks España, S.A., which is included in Terra Networks Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 26, 2003:



|333-73898 |  | Terra Networks 2001 Stock Option Plan                                                                                                
|--------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|333-12208 |  | Post-Effective Amendment to register ordinary shares from the Terra Networks 2000 Stock Option Plan previously registered on Form F-4



Madrid, Spain, June
26, 2003







|BDO Audiberia  /s/ Alfonso Osorio Iturmendi  Alfonso Osorio Iturmendi
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Heath B. ClarkeHeath B. ClarkeChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Brenda AgiusBrenda AgiusChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 4.(a).33

                 [FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY, NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSLATION]

                                  [State Seal]


                General License for Partner Communications Company Ltd.
                For the Provision of Mobile Radio Phone Services by the
                                Cellular Method (MRP)



                                Amendment No. 18



By virtue of the power of the Minister of Communications under section 4(e) of
the Communications Law (Telecommunications and Broadcasting), 5742-1982, that
has been delegated to us and after hearing the request of Partner Communications
Company Ltd. (hereinafter-"the Company") we hereby amend the general licence for
the provision of mobile radio phone services by the cellular method (MRP)
granted to the Company on April 7, 1998 as follows:



Amendment of Article 94


1.    The following shall replace Article 94.1:

     "The Licensee will submit to the Director an unconditional bank guarantee
      in the name of the State of Israel, in New Israeli Shekels, in the
      equivalent amount of  ten (10) million US Dollars ,to ensure fulfilment of
      the License guarantees; the guarantee is appended to this License as
      Appendix E to the Second Annex."







                  (signed)                   (signed)
May 29, 2003      Uri Olenik                 Haim Garon
                  Director General           Senior VP Engineering and Licensing
                  MOC                        MOC
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID CHARLES THATCHER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2547 MCE CMK P

vs.

M. PENNER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of

counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02547-MCE -CMK Document 28 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s January 3, 2006 motion

for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: January 12, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/mp

that 04cv2547.31

Case 2:04-cv-02547-MCE -CMK Document 28 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 54094.

#### Queen Lace Co. *v.*United States,

protest 49588-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6507

MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER

- GORBEY , C hief , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN FCI CUMBERLAND , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv - 00715

- RDB )

Submitted : September 27, 2019 Decided: November 6, 2019

Before NIEMEYER , FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael S. Gorbey , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael S. Owl Feather

- Gorbey, a District of Co lumbia code offender incarcerated at FCI Cumberland in Maryland , seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appea lability. ∗ 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a pri soner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or
wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S.
322 , 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S.
at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Owl Feather

- Gorbey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

∗ Because Owl Feather

- Gorbey was convicted in a District of Columbia court, he is required to obtain a certificate of appealability in order to appeal the denial of his habeas petition. See Madley v. United States Parole Comm’n , 278 F.3d 1306, 1310 (D.C. C ir. 2002).3 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,705] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 4, 2007 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Syngenta Crop Protection, Pasadena, Texas (TA-W-60,705). 

The petition was filed by three workers without three signatures. Without three signatures, the petition has been deemed invalid. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 5th day of January, 2007. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

 [FR Doc. E7-465 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v MARVIN J. MARTIN, Jr., Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

16 USCMA 125, 36 CMR 281

No. 18,989

March 11, 1966

*Colonel Joseph L. Chalk, Lieutenant Colonel Martin S. Drucker,*and *Captain Francis R. Jones*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Francis M. Cooper*and *Captain John D. Jackson*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The issues presented on the appeal are the same as those considered in United States v Albert, 16 USCMA 111, 36 CMR 267. For the reasons set out in our opinion in that case, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Judge Kilday concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Albert, 16 USCMA 111, 36 CMR 267, this day decided.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            I, Klaus Moeller, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief
Financial Officer of Genius Products, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify
pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
that:

            (1) the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant
for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), to which this statement
is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated:  July 13, 2004             By:    /S/ KLAUS MOELLER
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Klaus Moeller
                                          Chief Executive Officer and Interim
                                          Chief Financial Officer (principal
                                          financial officer)
No. 55289.

#### Geo. E. Mallinson Importing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 138109-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2007150EN.01000901.xml

| 4.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/9

---

Communication from the Kingdom of Belgium in connection with Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 150/07)

In accordance with Article 10 of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (1), the Kingdom of Belgium hereby communicates to the European Commission the following list of competent authorities for applications relating to areas located within the Flemish Region.

1

| — | All applications for licences to explore for and produce oil and gas must be submitted to the following authority pursuant to the Decree of the Flemish Government of 23 July 1997 on the form and procedure for examining applications for licences to explore for and produce oil and gas:





  Vlaamse Overheid (Flemish Government) |
| --- | --- |
| Departement Leefmilieu, Natuur en Energie |
| Afdeling Land en Bodembescherming, Ondergrond, Natuurlijke Rijkdommen |
| Koning Albert II-laan 20, bus 20 |
| B-1000 Brussels |

—

All applications for licences to explore for and produce oil and gas must be submitted to the following authority pursuant to the Decree of the Flemish Government of 23 July 1997 on the form and procedure for examining applications for licences to explore for and produce oil and gas:

Vlaamse Overheid (Flemish Government)

Departement Leefmilieu, Natuur en Energie

Afdeling Land en Bodembescherming, Ondergrond, Natuurlijke Rijkdommen

Koning Albert II-laan 20, bus 20

B-1000 Brussels

| — | The Flemish Minister responsible for natural resources will take a decision on any such licence applications. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Flemish Minister responsible for natural resources will take a decision on any such licence applications.

| — | Appeals against decisions taken by the Flemish Minister responsible for natural resources may be lodged with the Flemish Government. |
| --- | --- |

—

Appeals against decisions taken by the Flemish Minister responsible for natural resources may be lodged with the Flemish Government.

---

(1)  OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 3.

1

---
----

|                                                                                               |   | Three months      ended |      |   | Three months      ended |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|-----------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                               |   | March 31,    2008       |      |   | March 31,    2007       |   |
|                                                                                               |   |                    |      |   |                    |   |
|                                                                                               |   |                    |      |   |                    |   |
| Income available to common      stockholders                                                       |   | $                       | 2,129     |   |                    | $      | 383,333 |   |
|                                                                                               |   |                    |      |   |                    |   |   |   |
| Weighted average shares      outstanding                                                           |   |                    | 2,643,551 |   |                    |   | 2,675,233 |   |
|                                                                                               |   |                    |      |   |                    |   |   |   |
| Basic earnings per      share                                                                      |   | $                       | 0.001     |   |                    | $      | 0.143 |   |
|                                                                                               |   |                    |      |   |                    |   |   |   |
|                                                                                               |   |                    |      |   |                    |   |   |   |
| Income for diluted earnings per      share                                                         |   | $                       | 2,129     |   |                    | $      | 383,333 |   |
|                                                                                               |   |                    |      |   |                    |   |   |   |
| Total weighted average common      shares and equivalents outstanding for diluted      computation |   |                    | 2,643,551 |   |                    |   | 2,675,233 |   |
|                                                                                               |   |                    |      |   |                    |   |   |   |
| Diluted earnings per      share                                                                    |   | $                       | 0.001     |   |                    | $      | 0.143 |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Transax International Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Walters, chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Stephen WaltersStephen WaltersChief Executive OfficerApril 15, 2011
Accountants and
Management Consultants

The US Member Firm of
Grant Thornton International

(LOGO) Grant Thornton
GRANT THORNTON LLP



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON MANAGEMENT'S
ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS
SET FORTH IN THE UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR
MORTGAGE BANKERS


Board of Directors
Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.

We have examined  management's  assertion about Countrywide  Credit  Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned  subsidiary,  Countrywide
Home  Loans,  Inc.)  ("the  Company")  compliance  with  the  minimum  servicing
standards  identified in the Mortgage Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform
Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year
ended  February  29, 2000  included in the  accompanying  management  assertion.
Management  is  responsible  for the  Company's  compliance  with those  minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our opinion,  management's assertion that Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.
and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned  subsidiary,  Countrywide Home
Loans, Inc.) complied with the aforementioned  minimum servicing standards as of
and for the year ended  February  29,  2000 is fairly  stated,  in all  material
respects.

Grant Thornton LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 24, 2000

Suite 700
1000 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90017-2464
Tel: 213 627-1717
Fax: 213 624-6793
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Basset Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Madam Zhu Xiaojuan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. March 24, 2009 /s/ Madam Zhu Xiaojuan
 Chief Financial Officer