alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                     32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kimberly A. Springsteen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Kimberly A. Springsteen
----------------------------------------
Kimberly A. Springsteen
Principal Financial Officer
August 14, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000   

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                          887
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   891
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     1,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                3,899
<PP&E>                          2,882
<DEPRECIATION>                  2,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           602
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        243
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      3,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,103
<SALES>                         5,704
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                5,704
<CGS>                           6,441
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   6,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                283
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (923)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (923)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (1.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.00
        


</TABLE>
Order filed January 6, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00431

- CV

____________ JASMINE RICKS , Appellant

V. QUALITY CARRIERS, IN C. & CRAIG L. SMITH, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 17716



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due December 17, 2014

. No brief or motion for
extension of time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before February 5, 2015
, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
Ex10_39


Exhibit 10.39


CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED FOR PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT. PORTIONS FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED HAVE BEEN MARKED WITH THREE ASTERISKS [***] AND A FOOTNOTE INDICATING "CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED". MATERIAL OMITTED HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. 

FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT 
AMENDMENT #1
This Amendment #1 (this “Amendment”) is entered into by and between New Skies Satellites B.V. (“SES”), and Global Eagle Entertainment Inc. (“Customer”), and amends the Framework Agreement dated 28 October 2014 between SES and Customer (the “Agreement”).  Defined terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to revise the prepayment requirements under the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:
Effective Date:  The effective date of this Amendment shall be 5 January 2015 (the “Effective Date”)
Section 2 Prepayment and Security:  Subsection (a) (Pre-Payment) of Section 2 (Pre Payment and Security) is modified to include the following sentence at the end of the subsection:
*** 
In Witness Whereof, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date of last signature below.
	
		
	GLOBAL EAGLE ENTERTAINMENT INC.
	NEW SKIES SATELLITES B.V.

	By: /s/ Michael Pigott
	By: /s/ U Bouwsma

	Name: Michael Pigott
	Name: U. Bouwsma

	Title: VP Legal
	Title: Director

	Date: February 2, 2015
	Date: February 11, 2015





	
	
	*** Confidential treatment requested.












[INSERT W9 FORM]
(Reap. Dec. 8536)

#### Max Eckardt & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 812001-1/2, etc.

*523(Decided February 1, 1956)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between counsel, subject to the approval of the court, as follows:

> 1. That the above-enumerated appeals may be limited to those items on the invoices where, on entry, the importer added to meet advances by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal.

> 2. That the items of merchandise to which these appeals have been limited were, at the time of exportation to the United States, freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, packed ready for shipment, at the appraised values less the amounts added on entry to meet advances by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal, and that there was no higher foreign market value.

> 3. That the appeals may be submitted.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved where, on entry, the importer added to meet advances by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal, and that such values were the appraised values, less the amounts added on entry to meet advances by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal.

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise, they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 57312.

protest 199942-K (New York).

#### Joseph Victori & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shredded or grated coconut meat in sirup, in tins, a product of Cuba, similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Allied Food Corporation of America*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 222, C. D. 1412), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10562-10563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,793]


Weyerhaeuser Company, Aberdeen, WA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on January 19, 2007, in response to a petition filed by 
the United Brotherhood of Carpenters Industrial Union on behalf of 
workers at Weyerhaeuser Company, Aberdeen, Washington.
    This petitioning group of workers is covered by an active 
certification, (TA-W-58,442) that expires on January 25, 2008. Since 
the Department of Labor recently discovered that the workers are not 
separately identifiable by product line the Department of Labor amended

[[Page 10563]]

on January 23, 2007 certification to include all workers of 
Weyerhaeuser Company, Aberdeen, Washington engaged in the production of 
softwood dimensional lumber. Consequently, further investigation in 
this case would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose; therefore the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 26th day of February 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-4064 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 12 (the  "Partnership")  for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
October 29, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4885 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4885

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to require that additional 
  factors be included in the design of counseling pathways under the 
      Transition Assistance Program of the Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2024

 Ms. Cortez Masto introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
           and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to require that additional 
  factors be included in the design of counseling pathways under the 
      Transition Assistance Program of the Department of Defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transition Improvement by Estimating 
Risk Act'' or the ``TIER Act''.

SEC. 2. FACTORS FOR COUNSELING PATHWAYS UNDER TRANSITION ASSISTANCE 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1142(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (M) as subparagraph (R); 
        and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (L) the following new 
        subparagraphs:
            ``(M) Child care requirements of the member (including 
        whether a dependent of the member is enrolled in the 
        Exceptional Family Member Program).
            ``(N) The employment status of other adults in the 
        household of the member.
            ``(O) The location of the duty station of the member 
        (including whether the member was separated from family while 
        on duty).
            ``(P) The effects of operating tempo and personnel tempo on 
        the member and the household of the member.
            ``(Q) Whether the member is an Indian or urban Indian, as 
        those terms are defined in section 4 of the Indian Health Care 
        Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. 1603).''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 52639.

protests 124382-K, etc. (New York).

#### Dextar Fur Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. O. *Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.2


             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT


I, Kyu Bae Park, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Korea Thrunet Co., Ltd.
     (the "Company").

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report.

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
          financial reporting.

5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date: July 15, 2004

/s/ Kyu Bae Park
------------------
Kyu Bae Park
Chief Financial Officer
(performing similar functions of a chief financial officer)
# C_2007063EN.01000401.xml

| 17.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/4

---

Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Community of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China: change of the name of one company which is subject to an average anti-dumping duty for co-operating companies

inter alia

(2007/C 63/03)

Imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China ('PRC') are subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty, imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 (1) dated 25.09.2006.

inter alia

1

YANTAI LONGQUAN PACKAGING MATERIAL CO., LTD, a company located in the PRC, whose exports to the Community of certain plastic sacks and bags are subject to an average anti-dumping duty for co-operating companies of 8,4 % by the above-mentioned Regulation, has informed the Commission that the company name changed on 21 July 2004 to YANTAI LONGQUAN PLASTIC AND RUBBER PRODUCTS CO., LTD. The change of Enterprise registration was approved by the ‘Administration of Industry and Commerce of Yantai City ’on 21 July 2004.

The company substantiated its request for a change of name in Annex I of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 with the fact that it mistakenly used its former name within the Anti-Dumping proceeding. Therefore the company argued that the change of name does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the average anti-dumping duty for co-operating companies applied to the company under its previous name of YANTAI LONGQUAN PACKAGING MATERIAL CO., LTD.

The Commission has examined the information provided and has concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006. Therefore, the reference to YANTAI LONGQUAN PACKAGING MATERIAL CO., LTD, should be read as YANTAI LONGQUAN PLASTIC AND RUBBER PRODUCTS CO., LTD. in Annex I of Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006.

The TARIC additional code A766 previously attributed to YANTAI LONGQUAN PACKAGING MATERIAL CO., LTD, shall apply to YANTAI LONGQUAN PLASTIC AND RUBBER PRODUCTS CO., LTD.

---

(1)  OJ L 270, 29.9.2006, p. 4.

1

---
68°45'E

68°30°E

68°15'E

4? 0000

A1 0000

af 4

68°E

49°00

ss

.
*

t
1
”
a
wey
“Ses }
+

a.
-
i ie a ae
¢ i \ cal .

’

5 KILOMETERS
4 MILES

City, town, or village
‘-- Province boundary

Road
Peak

22s Oe

ear

. }

WN al

f }
7 i
—
# .
ee

A

| i-
aw

> |
Qa
’ AN

"AS
;
bee

rz

am

34°45'N
6813

#### SALLEY v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RY.

Costs. — In a law case, judgment on appeal affirming judgment below except in amount, is an affirmance for purpose of taxing costs of this Court.

Before PjrincE, J., Richland.

Affifmed.

Action by J. I. Salley against Seaboard Air Rine Railway. From judgment on Circuit affirming clerk’s taxation of costs, defendant appeals.

*Messrs. Lyles &*McMahan, for appellants,

cite: Code, 1903, Chap. CIII; 35 S. C., 345; 45 S. C., 5; 47 S. C., Í63; 43 S. C., 363; 5 Ency. P. & P., 303; 11 Cyc., 313; 41 S. C.; 306; 44 S. C., 377.

*Messrs. DePass & DePass*and *Jas. H. Powles, Jr.,*contra,

cite: 33 S. €., 313; 13 S. C., 397; 35 S. C., 343; 44 S. C., 5; 47 S. C., 163; 43 S. C., 363; 11 Cyc., 314; 44 S. C„ 376; 41 S- C., 306; 46 Ga., 454; 36 S. C., 554; Code of Proc., 373.

March 20, 1908.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court affirming taxation of Supreme Court costs by the clerk in favor of plaintiff in the above entitled case.

The plaintiff had recovered judgment against defendant before a magistrate for two dollars damages and forty dollars statutory penalty for delay in transportation of freight, and this judgment was affirmed by the Circuit Court. On appeal to this Court (76 S. C., 173), it was held that Sunday was not to be included in the days for which penalty is allowed, and the Court rendered judgment “that the judg*389ment of the Circuit Court be affirmed with the reduction of five dollars, the overcharge on the amount found as penalty.”

Each side claiming to be the “prevailing party” gave notice of taxation of Supreme Court costs before the clerk, with the result as stated.

The question presented is, Which party is entitled to the costs as prevailing party? This is a case at law and the Court can only affirm or reverse, and has no power to modify as in equity cases. *Hosford*v. *Wynn,*22 S. C., 313. The judgment of this Court, therefore, in terms and in legal effect was substantially a judgment of- affirmance. Of course, it can not be said that defendant prevailed in reversing the judgment. Where the case is one in equity and the appellant succeeds in substantially modifying the decree, costs may be allowed him as prevailing party. *Sullivan*v. *Lalimer,*43 S. C., 262, 21 S. E. 3.

The judgment in this case, if it is not to be strictly construed as an affirmance of the judgment appealed from,, bears analogy to cases at law in which a new trial *nisi*has been granted, but judgment to stand affirmed upon remitting the amount designated by the Court, in which case, if the remittance is made and judgment stands affirmed for the reduced amount, the party whose judgment stands affirmed is the prevailing party and entitled to costs of appeal. *Stepp*v. *Association,*41 S. C., 206, 19 S. E., 490; *Young*v. *Cohen,*44 S. C., 376, 22 S. E., 409.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MedAssets, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antoinne Murphy, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 9]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered March 11, 1993, convicting him *571of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

To the extent that the defendant has preserved for appellate review his contention that the Supreme Court improperly admitted into evidence certain testimony by the defendant’s mother and two other prosecution witnesses, it is without merit *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Bruen,*136 AD2d 648). The testimony in question, which was essentially innocuous, was relevant to the defendant’s alleged belief that the unarmed victim was a sniper. It also served to establish the basis for the victim’s presence at the scene of the crime. Moreover, the Supreme Court properly instructed the jury on the limited relevance of the testimony *(see, People v Berg,*59 NY2d 294).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.