alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 50 (Thursday, March 15, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4765]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Parts 531 and 533

[Docket No. NHTSA-2007-27350]


Corporate Average Fuel Economy--Request for Product Plan 
Information for Model Year 2007-2017 Passenger Cars and 2010-2017 Light 
Trucks

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Request for comments; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the dates and addresses captions in a 
request for comments published in the Federal Register of February 27, 
2007 (72 FR 8664), regarding the acquisition of new and updated 
manufacturers' future product plans to aid in implementing the 
President's plan for reforming and increasing corporate average fuel 
economy (CAFE) standards for passenger cars and further increasing the 
already reformed light truck standards. The DATES caption did not 
include the correct date for submission of light truck product plans, 
and the addresses caption did not include a complete docket number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Katz, (202) 366-4936.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of February 27, 2007, in FR Doc. 07-878, 
make the following corrections. On page 8664, in the third column, 
correct the DATES caption to read:

DATES: Passenger car comments must be received on or before May 29, 
2007. Light truck comments must be received on or before June 27, 2007.
    On page 8664, in the third column, correct the first three lines of 
the ADDRESSES caption to read:

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT DMS Docket Number 
2007-27350] by any of the following methods:

    Issued: March 9, 2007.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
 [FR Doc. E7-4765 Filed 3-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
**EXHIBIT 4**
REPORT ON DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIALREPORTING
Management of Sun Life Financial Inc. (the Company), including its ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Rule 13a-15e of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as ofDecember 31, 2003 and have concluded that these disclosure controls andprocedures were operating effectively as of December 31, 2003.
In addition there have been no material changes in internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15f of the United States SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934) during the financial year ended December 31, 2003, exceptthe following:
During 2003, the Company’s United States operations were involved in evaluatingand enhancing the internal control environment acquired from the acquisition ofKeyport Life Insurance Company. Significant progress has been made in thisregard.
During 2003, the Company’s Canadian operations were involved in integrating thebusiness operations arising from the acquisition of Clarica Life InsuranceCompany. This integration was designed to combine operational strengthsthrough selecting the best processes from the organizations that were beingintegrated and is now substantially complete. This integration resulted inseveral changes to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.These changes were managed through the development, execution and monitoring ofcomprehensive integration plans.
No. 49213.

#### Protest 102627-K of Schenley Import Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the collector’s memorandum was admitted in evidence by the court and it was stipulated between counsel that the facts contained therein are true. It was recommended by counsel on behalf of the Government that the claim for shortage be allowed in accordance with the collector's memorandum. On the record presented the court directed the collector to reliquidate the entry and make refund accordingly.
No. 64192.

protests 312308-K, 315339-K, and 315340-K (Laredo).

#### Rio Grande Importing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002.**In connection with the Quarterly Report of HLI OperatingCompany, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Curtis J. Clawson, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Curtis J. Clawson           Curtis J. Clawson *President and Chief Executive Officer*June 9, 2005
40
<Page>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1

                               724 SOLUTIONS INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of 724 Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John J. Sims, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
of my knowledge:

              (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934, and

              (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
              indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Date: March 31, 2003                              By: /S/ JOHN J. SIMS
                                                      ----------------
                                                  Name: John J. Sims
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00552-CV

The City of Luling, Appellant

v.

Guadalupe Blanco River Authority, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 421ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 15-O-544, HONORABLE TODD BLOMERTH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed an agreed motion to dismissthe appeal, explaining that the parties

have settled their dispute and negotiated a new contract that renders moot the issues that were the

subject of this appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Dismissed as Moot

Filed: December 29, 2016
(Reap. Dec. 8516)

#### John V. Cake & Son, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 23824; 741.

(Decided January 12, 1956)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the court, that at the time of exportation of the involved merchandise, no statutory foreign value, export value or United States value existed therefor.

It is further stipulated and agreed that the cost of production thereof as defined in Section 402 (f), Tariff Act of 1930, is as follows:

> As to Reappraisement No. 262468-A, Entry #23824 of 6/30/55:

> Canadian Currency

> 50,000 pieces of item No. 2205443 Shim Rad

> Support_$0,026 each net packed

> As to Reappraisement No. 262469-A, Entry #741 of 7/12/55:

> 4,900 pieces of item No. 5840160 lines RR

> SP cover_ $70.60 per 1,000 net packed

> 1,440 pieces of item No. 5440161 lines RR

> SP cover_ $74.90 per 1,000 net packed

It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases are submitted to the Court for decision upon the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper *503basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> As to Reappraisement No. 262468-A, Entry 23824 of 6/30/55:

> Canadian Currency

> 50,000 pieces of item No. 2205443 Shim Rad

> Support_ $0,026 each net packed

> As to reappraisement No. 262469-A, Entry 741 of 7/12/55:

> 4,900 pieces of item No. 5840160 lines RR

> SP cover_ $70.60 per 1,000 net packed

> 1,440 pieces of item No. 5440161 lines RR SP cover_ $74.90 per 1,000 net packed

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of IceWEB, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A, Amendment No. 2, for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Mark B. Lucky, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. 
       The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





February
      10, 2011
              /s/ Mark B. LuckyMark
      B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer and
                principal
      financial and accounting
officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4851 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4851

To adjust the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area to 
                  include the Scarper Ridge property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2024

  Mr. Padilla introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To adjust the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area to 
                  include the Scarper Ridge property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Scarper Ridge Golden Gate National 
Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. SCARPER RIDGE BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    Section 2(a)(2) of Public Law 92-589 (16 U.S.C. 460bb-1(a)(2)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(F) Land generally depicted as `Proposed Boundary 
                Addition' on the map entitled `Golden Gate National 
                Recreation Area Proposed Boundary Addition', numbered 
                641/193973, and dated July 2024.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Ominto, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2015
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ivan Braiker, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



DATE:
January 13, 2016



| | /s/
    IVAN BRAIKER       
| | ---------------------------
| | Ivan
    Braiker           
| | Chief
    Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAMON LAMAR FOSTER, No. 2:04-cv-2281-MCE-DAD-P 

Petitioner,

v. ORDER

WARDEN SCRIBNER, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an

Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On January 18, 2006, the magistrate judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any Objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. 

Case 2:04-cv-02281-MCE -DAD Document 22 Filed 03/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Neither party has filed Objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 18, 2006,

are adopted in full; 

2. Petitioner’s June 15, 2005 Motion for Writ of

Mandate/Prohibition is denied;

3. Respondents’ March 15, 2005 Motion to Dismiss is

granted; and

4. This action is dismissed with prejudice because the

petition presents only unexhausted claims and was filed beyond

the one-year statute of limitations.

DATE: March 1, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02281-MCE -DAD Document 22 Filed 03/02/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIUS LEE JACKSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0983 LKK GGH P

vs.

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On July 8, 2005, plaintiff filed a request that the Court order return of his

property. On July 12, 2005, plaintiff filed a document alleging that he has been transferred to

Pelican Bay State Prison as of June 29, 2005 and that his legal and personal property has not

accompanied him. Those documents were not served on defendants. Plaintiff is advised that

every document submitted to the court for consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R.

Civ. P. 5. Documents not to be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the

U.S. mail. If an attorney has filed a document with the court on behalf of any defendants, then

documents submitted by plaintiff must be served on that attorney and not on the defendants. 

Every document submitted conventionally to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se)

must include a certificate stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to

defendants or their attorney and the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and

Case 2:04-cv-00983-LKK -GGH Document 41 Filed 08/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

(c).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s July 8, 2005 request that the Court order return of his property is

denied without prejudice for its not having been served;

2. Plaintiff’s July 12, 2005 filing is also defective because it was not served and

any request therein is denied without prejudice, but the Clerk of the Court is directed to deem

that document, entered as # 39, as a notice of change of address and to enter plaintiff’s current

address as Pelican Bay State Prison as set forth in that filing;

3. The Clerk of the Court is also directed to re-serve the court’s order, filed on

July 14, 2005, upon plaintiff at his new address. 

4. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to properly serve any documents subsequently

filed in this action, and failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may

result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed

DATED: 8/5/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009/bb

jack0983.35

Case 2:04-cv-00983-LKK -GGH Document 41 Filed 08/05/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4634 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4634

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 154 First Avenue East in Jerome, Idaho, as the ``Representative 
                       Maxine Bell Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPRESENTATIVE MAXINE BELL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 154 First Avenue East in Jerome, Idaho, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Representative Maxine Bell Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Representative Maxine Bell Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate December 19 (legislative day, December 
      16), 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4634

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 154 First Avenue East in Jerome, Idaho, as the ``Representative 
                       Maxine Bell Post Office''.
```
#### Margaret Neely, *Respondent, v.*Allen Taylor, Appellant.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Order denying new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence reversed. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4868 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the use of official time 

by Federal employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2024 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the use 

of official time by Federal employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Union Time on 

5 the Taxpayer’s Dime Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF OFFICIAL TIME. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7131 of title 5, United 

8 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4868 IS

1 ‘‘§ 7131. Elimination of official time 

2 ‘‘Any activities performed by an employee relating to 

3 the business of a labor organization shall be performed 

4 during the time the employee is in a non-duty status.’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

6 for subchapter IV of chapter 71 of title 5, United States 

7 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

8 7131 and inserting the following: 

‘‘7131. Elimination of official time.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH A. SHERMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF DAVIS,

Defendant.

CIV. S-04-2320 LKK PAN PS

ORDER 

-o0oOn November 10, 2005, this court granted plaintiff’s

motion to file both an original and supplemental complaint and

directed defendant to file a comprehensive answer within twenty

days. Defendant filed its answer November 18, 2005. 

Plaintiff and defendant are directed to file, by Friday,

January 20, 2006, separate status reports addressing the

following matters: 

(a) Jurisdiction and venue;

(b) Anticipated motions;

Case 2:04-cv-02320-LKK -EFB Document 21 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

(c) Anticipated discovery and disclosure

of expert witnesses;

(d) Future proceedings, including setting

appropriate deadlines for discovery, motions,

and scheduling the pretrial conference and

trial;

(e) Estimate of length of trial;

(f) Modification of standard pretrial procedures

specified by the rules due to the relative

simplicity or complexity of the action or 

proceedings;

(g) Whether the case is related to any other case,

including any matter in bankruptcy;

(h) Whether a settlement conference should be

scheduled;

(I) Any other matters that may add to the just and

expeditious disposition of this matter.

The court will issue a scheduling order after review of

the parties’ status reports. 

So ordered.

Dated: November 28, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02320-LKK -EFB Document 21 Filed 11/28/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 52062.

#### Max Mayer & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 617746-G, etc. (New York).

*181Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiffs was therefore sustained.