alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 44051.

#### Protest 449120-G of Mosse, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The evidence showed that certain items consist of Venice laces similar to those involved in *Littwitz*v. *United States*(3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Ramirez, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 479]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered April 20, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Bynum, 70*NY2d 858). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People*
      *380
      *v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. While the defendant bases his arguments largely on the credibility of the eyewitness to the crime, it is well settled that issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s summation are either unpreserved for appellate review or do not warrant reversal.

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4156

_____________________________

PETER M. BAPTISTE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

September 19, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Candice Kaye Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, 

and Melissa Joy Ford, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
Before the Third Division,

March 29, 1945

No. 50082.

#### Protests 22661-K, etc., of S. A. Haram et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 470 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 470

   To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the Medicare 
    exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for 
                   hospitals, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2023

  Mr. Lankford (for himself, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Young, Mr. 
 Cotton, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Paul, Mr. Cornyn, 
 Mr. Cruz, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Budd) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the Medicare 
    exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for 
                   hospitals, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Access to Higher Quality 
Health Care Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE REFORM PROVISIONS LIMITING MEDICARE 
              EXCEPTION TO THE PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN PHYSICIAN 
              REFERRALS FOR HOSPITALS.

    Sections 6001 and 10601 of the Patient Protection and Affordable 
Care Act (Public Law 111-148; 124 Stat. 684, 1005) and section 1106 of 
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 
111-152; 124 Stat. 1049) are repealed and the provisions of law amended 
by such sections are restored as if such sections had never been 
enacted.
                                 <all>
```
About the CFPB

The CFPB is focused on making the consumer financial markets work for families by empowering consumers to take more control over their financial lives. We are working to foster a marketplace:Where customers can see prices 

and risks up front and where they can easily make product comparisons

In which no one can build a 

business model around unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices

That works for American 

consumers, responsible providers, and the economy as a whole

Join our social networks

facebook.com/CFPBMilitary

twitter.com/CFPBMilitary

consumer

OFFISERVAFFA

Get help now 

Submit a Consumer Complaint 

[Mortgage, Bank Account, Credit Card, Student Loan, Vehicle or Consumer Loan, Credit Reporting, and more]

Tell your story about other financial 

products

consumerfinance.govcomplaint line (855) 411-CFPB (2372)TTY/TDD (855) 729-CFPB (2372)military@cfpb.gov (202) 435-7000Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW 
The Office of 

Servicemember AffairsThe Office of Servicemember Affairs is here to ensure that military personnel and their families have a voice at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Our MissionWe monitor military consumer complaints and the resolution of those complaints.We work with federal, state, and local partners to address the financial concerns of servicemembers, veterans, and their families.We provide servicemembers, military families, and veterans with the information and tools to make the right financial decisions for them and to avoid unfair financial business practices.

What makes servicemembers attractive financial targets?

Many lenders know the UCMJ 

requires service members to pay their debts

Servicemembers are easy to find, 

so lenders are confident they can collect debts owed

Military pay represents a steady 

income that can be garnished 

Military families often start young, 

leading to big money-management decisions by first-time decision makers

Servicemembers face unique risks

Deployments, change of duty 

stations, and emergencies lead to unplanned and unique financial difficulties

The consequences of poor 

financial decisions can devastate a servicemember’s career and even affect the mission readiness of a military unit

Planning Service in thdoors and pservicememfuture. We hthe financial veterans and trusted sourcconsumer finA cop on Along with ththat cater to there are alsthat target sedeals and ouservicememand veterans and tools thebusiness prathat servicemchallenges a

Holly Petraeus Director of the C
ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS: TEST

PROCEDURES FOR FLUORESCENT AND INCANDESCENT LAMPS

NAME

TITLE

ADDRESS

TELEPHONE

PUBLIC MEETING

MARCH 5, 1996

FAX NO.

ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS: TEST

PROCEDURES FOR FLUORESCENT AND INCANDESCENT LAMPS

PUBLIC MEETING

MARCH 5, 1996

NAME

TITLE

ADDRESS

TELEPHONE j,,: -' - L> `I `1 `/ y, t FAX NO. -6 Y `e - Y JEE-RM-94-220-IF COMMENT 27B-4
ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS: TEST

PROCEDURES FOR FLUORESCENT AND INCANDESCENT LAMPS

PUBLIC MEETING

MARCH 5, 1996

NAME

TITLE

ADDRESS

EE-RM-94-220-IF COMMENT 27B-4
American Council for an

Energy-Efficient Economy

St -__ - "a .

Deputy Director

1001 Connecticut Ave., N.W.

Washington. DC 20036

ELE

_H

PRODUCTS

DIVISIONS OF

(202) 429-8873

Fax (202) 429-2248

E-mail: Steven_Nadel@ccmail.pnl.gov

DIC TOOL

INCANDESCENT LAMPS

SELF BALLASTED

MERCURY VAPOR LAMPS

FLUORESCENT LAMPS

QUARTZ HALOGEN LAMPS

SAF-T-COTE SHATTERPROOF LAMPS

NE

114 POPLAR STREET < i " LE. PA 16335 • 8141336-4468

OUTSIDE PA Cf _L TOLL FREE 800-441-7796

a Drve ^t -'004

' Commercial Engineer

201-808-1800. Ext. 5870

Fax: 201-808-6633

David A. Krailo

Product Marketing Manager

Linear Fluorescent Lamps 0-7

D- _

Ts

Fe

Peter A. Bleasby

Director

Industry Relations

& Standards

' IIA INC.

eat

923

750-2441

-_432

Development

'^-IA INC.

Street

01923

(508) 750-2354

0-2080

EE-RM-94-220-IF COMMENT 27B-4
**Exhibit 31(b)**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, William R. Talley, Jr., certifythat:

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Frederick CountyBancorp, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting
| Date: May 4, 2006 | /s/ William R.  Talley, Jr. |
|-------------------|----------------------------------|
|              | William R.  Talley, Jr.     |
|              | Executive Vice  President        |
|              | Chief Financial  Officer         |

 

----
6786

#### CAREY v. TOLBERT.

Magistrate — Discretion—Appeal.—Whether a circuit judge will set aside a magistrate's judgment by default and grant a new trial upon a showing that manifest injustice has been done upon satisfactory excuse of default, is discretionary, and such order is not appealable except there be abuse thereof.

*265Before Purdy, J., Greenwood,

February term, 1907.

Affirmed!.

Action by A. C. Garey against R. R. Tolbert, Sr. From Circuit order affirming judgment of Magistrate W. G. Austin, taken by default and refusing to open the judgment, defendant appeal®.

*Mr. Ellis G. Gray don,*for appellant.

*Mr. George T. Magill,*contra.

March 3, 1908.

The opinion oí the 'Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This action w'as commenced before a magistrate.

The sumlmlon® was dated 6th of August, 1906, and required the defendant to appear at the Magistrate’s office at 10 of dock a. ml., on the 30th of August, 190'6, to answer th'e complaint, or judgment would be given against him by default. The defendant failed to 'appear at 10 o’dlock and the magistrate .postponed the hearing until 2 o’clock p. m. of that day. The defendant still' failed to appear, and the plaintiff introduced testimony to prove the allegations of the complaint, whereupon magistrate rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $85.20.

The defendant appealed under Section 368 of the Code of Procedure, but bis Honor, the Circuit Judge, dimissed the appeal.

He then appealed to this Court.

The respondent’s attorney raises the preliminary question whether the order is appealable.

Section 368 of the Code provides: “If the defendant failed to appear before the magistrate, 'and it is shown by the affidavits served by the 'appellant, or otherwise, that mjanifest injustice has been dañe, and he satisfactorily excuses bis *266default, the Court may, in its discretion, set aside or suspend judgment amd order a new trial.”

The order oif his Honor, the Circuit Judge, in refusing the defendant’s motion Was discretionary, and, as the appellant ha's failed to satisfy this Court that his discretion wias abused, the order is not appealable.

I't is the judgment of this Court, that the judgment of the Circuit 'Court be affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel VITA Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 3, 2007, at noon Eastern Time. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Barbara Toy at 1-888-912-1227, or (414) 231-2360. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel VITA Issue Committee will be held Tuesday, April 3, 2007, at noon, Eastern Time via a telephone                           ( print page 11942)                        conference call. You can submit written comments to the Panel by faxing to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, P.O. Box 3205, Milwaukee, WI 53201-3205, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org*. Public comments will also be welcome during the meeting. Please contact Barbara Toy at 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360 for additional information.                 

The agenda will include the following: Various VITA Issues. 

Dated: March 7, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E7-4598 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 10.3

kpmg


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                        REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To LYCOS Europe N.V., Haarlem

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Nos.
333-73898 and 333-12208), of Terra Networks, S.A. on Form S-8 of our reports
dated January 31, 2005 and January 28, 2004, with respect to the balance sheet
of Lycos Europe N.V. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholder's equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2004 which reports appear in the December 31, 2004, Annual
Report on Form 20-F of Terra Networks, S.A.





Dusseldorf, Germany
April 14, 2005


KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft



Stefan Haas                         Charlotte Niessen
Wirtschaftsprufer                   Wirtschaftspruferin
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN HACKETT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2088 FCD PAN P

vs.

D. KIMBRELL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file and serve a second amended

complaint pursuant to the court's order of March 8, 2006. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's April 7, 2006, request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve a

second amended complaint. 

DATED: April 18, 2006.

/mp/004

hack2088.36

Case 2:04-cv-02088-FCD-EFB Document 31 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Robert J. Messey, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arch Western Resources, LLC;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 12, 2005   /s/ Robert J. Messey     Robert J. Messey
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,
          AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Martin P. Gilmore, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

         (i) The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
         quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
         as amended; and

         (ii) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         LightFirst Inc.


                                      Date: August 16, 2004

                                      /s/ Martin P. Gilmore
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      Martin P. Gilmore
                                      President, Chief Executive Officer, and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
                                      Financial Officer)