alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 42924.

#### Protest 799911-G of B. Altman *& Co.*(New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of photo frames chiefly used on the table, in the kitchen or in the household. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. Abstract 38069 followed. No evidence was submitted to show that the collector erred in assessing additional duty of 3 cents per pound on the copper content of the articles under section 601, Revenue Act of 1932. That claim was therefore overruled.
(LOGO)ARTHUR ANDERSEN

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.:

We  have  examined  management's  assertion  about  SUNTRUST  MORTGAGE,   INC.'S
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Banks ("USAP") and that the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy in the amounts of $100,000,000  and $28,500,000,  respectively,
as of and for the year ended  December  31, 1999,  included in the  accompanying
management  assertion.  Management is responsible  for the Company's  compliance
with those minimum  servicing  standards and for maintaining a fidelity bond and
errors and  omissions  policy.  Our  responsibility  is to express an opinion on
management's  assertion about the entity's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards and  maintenance  of a fidelity  bond and errors and omissions  policy
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned  minimum servicing standards and that the Company had in effect a
fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $100,000,000 and
$28,500,000,  respectively,  as of and for the year ended  December 31, 1999 is
fairly stated in all material respects.



Arthur Andersen LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
February 10,2000
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ LEO F. WELLS, III                                     
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive
Officer August 4, 2005  
|                                                          
|/s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                   
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial
Officer August 4, 2005
No. 61391.

protests 302342-K, etc. (New York).

#### Vita Food Products, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sprats in oil, packed in tins, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnold Sorensin Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00246-CV 

IN RE TITEFLEX CORPORATION, GASTITE DIVISION, RELATOR 

 

Original Proceeding 

 

July 31, 2014 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

On June 28, 2014, Relator, Titeflex Corporation, filed its petition for writ of 

mandamus in which it requested that this Court compel Respondent, the Honorable 

Ruben Reyes, presiding judge of the 72nd District Court of Lubbock County, to grant 

Relator’s motion for a continuance. This Court granted an emergency stay of the 

proceedings on June 28. On July 25, 2014, Relator filed its unopposed motion to 

dismiss its petition in which Relator represents to the Court that the parties have come 

to a confidential settlement agreement which renders moot the underlying subject of the 

mandamus action.
2

Consequently, we dispense with the ten-day waiting period on this motion, grant 

Relator’s motion, and dismiss Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 10.3(a)(2).

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice
** **

**Exhibit 32(b)**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Frederick CountyBancorp, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, I, William R. Talley, Jr.,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Frederick CountyBancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge andbelief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the informationcontained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.
| /s/ William R. Talley, Jr.                           |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| William R. Talley, Jr.                               |   |   |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
|                                                      |        |        |  |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Stefan
A. Bird, President of CE Generation, LLC (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the
best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    
    the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
      December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.Dated:
    February
      25, 2005
 
 /s/
Stefan A. Bird
 Stefan A.
Bird
 President
 (chief
executive officer)
No. 51728.

#### Protest 114837-K of Siegfried Loewenthal Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of barrels numbered 3, 9, 63, 101, 159, 160, 167, and 181, was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gauger’s return as verified by the affidavit of the importer. The protest was sustained to this extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL ASBERRY,

NO. CIV. S-04-2467 LKK/PAN

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

The court is in receipt of a letter from the City Attorney

requesting that the court withdraw its sanctions order. Although

not in proper form, nor supported properly, the court treats the

letter as a formal motion.

The court is also in receipt of the plaintiff’s opposition.

In light of that opposition, the motion is DENIED.

Given that Mr. Jackson provided copies of his letter to the

Mayor, City Manager and members of the City Council, and given that

the letter apparently contained misinformation concerning the

events underlying the court’s order, and given the court’s desire

Case 2:04-cv-02467-LKK -PAN Document 35 Filed 06/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

to maintain appropriate relations with the City, the City Attorney

is now ordered to provided those city officials with a copy of the

plaintiff’s opposition as well as provide the court with notice of

the service. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 8, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02467-LKK -PAN Document 35 Filed 06/08/05 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL CARTER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 347 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of September, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40653

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERARDO LAGUNAS-LEIJA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:05-CR-870-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gerardo LagunasLeija raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Before the Second Division,

December 18, 1958

No. 62614.

#### Beer Stern Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 318012-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of narrow woven fabrics of cotton similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Beer Stern Import Corp.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 294, C. D. 1944), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
================================================================================


Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Tamarack  Ventures,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  January 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


Date:  March 15, 2005


/s/ Robert Reukl
-------------------------------------------
Robert Reukl, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
(Reap. Dec. 10459)

#### D. E. Sanford and Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 2440, etc.

(Decided February 27, 1963)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OlifeR, Chief Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, as follows:

> 1. That this stipulation is limited to merchandise appraised in Belgian francs.

> 2. That as so limited, the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Descoware Corp.*v. *United States,*R.D. 10158, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 3. On or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, were the appraised *per se*unit values in Belgian francs, plus 10% sales tax, plus packing as invoiced, said prices including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States; and that on or about the said dates of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered in the principal markets of the country of exportation for sale to the United States.

> 4. That the involved merchandise was entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption before the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 5. That the appeals on Schedule “A” annexed may be submitted upon this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and issues described above and abandoned in all other respects.

On. the agreed facts and consistent with, the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise appraised in Belgian francs is foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.O. (1952 edition) § 1402), and that such statutory value therefor is the appraised *per se*unit values in Belgian francs, plus 10 per centum sales tax, plus packing, as invoiced.

As to all other merchandise, not appraised in Belgian francs, enumerated on the invoices covered by the entries involved herein, the appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.
No. 59590.

protest 218597-K, etc.

#### Davies Turner & Company et al. *v.*United States,

Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
DATOS

RÁPIDOS

Departamento del Trabajo de EE.UU.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA

Administración de 

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional

Protéjase

La Gripe Aviar

Empleados del Cuidado de la Salud 

La gripe aviar, es una enfermedad viral y puede ser muy contagiosa

y hasta causar la muerte en aves (ej., pollos). De gran preocupación

son los virus altamente patogénicos de gripe aviar, (HPAI) H5N1,

los cuales han causado la muerte a millones de aves y han infectado a humanos en otros países. Si estos virus se encontraran en los

Estados Unidos, tome las precauciones apropiadas. Además, los

pacientes que hayan viajado en un período de 10 días, a un país

con actividad de gripe aviar y que hayan sido hospitalizados por

una enfermedad respiratoria severa y febril o que haya sido por lo

contrario, evaluado para gripe aviar, debe de ser aislado, usando

las siguientes precauciones.

Medidas de Precaución Básicas

• Lávese sus manos muy cuidadosamente de 15 a 20 segundos,

antes y después de tener todo tipo de contacto con los pacientes

o contacto con superficies que hayan sido potencialmente contaminadas con secreciones respiratorias. 

Precauciones de Contacto

• Use guantes y una bata para todo tipo de contacto con los pacientes.

• Use equipo desechable (puños especiales para presión sanguínea, termómetros) o equipo que pueda ser desinfectado

antes de usarlo con otro paciente (ej., estetoscopios).

Precauciones contra la Infección por Gotitas:

• Use gafas protectoras / mascarillas para proteger la cara a 3 pies

del paciente.

Precauciones contra la Transmisión por Aire

• El paciente debe de ser puesto en una habitación aislada de

corrientes de aire.

• Si no hay una habitación de este tipo, se deben de usar filtros

(HEPA por sus siglas en Inglés) desechables.

• Use por lo menos, un respirador desechable, N95, cuando se

encuentre en la habitación de aislamiento o en otra habitación

donde se encuentre el paciente y especialmente cuando este

participando en procesos de generación de aerosol de alto riesgo.

Estrategias de Prevención de Transmisión

• Los pacientes infectados en grupo, deberán permanecer en una

habitación, si no hay habitaciones privadas, disponibles.

• Disminuya el transporte de pacientes, afuera de la habitación.

• Limite el número de empleados al cuidado de los pacientes.

• Limite el número de visitas a los pacientes.

Guía Adicional

• Póngase la vacuna contra la gripe de temporada.

• Si usted desarrolla síntomas parecidos a los de la gripe, permanezca en casa, excepto para recibir atención medica.

• Los síntomas de la gripe aviar y de la gripe humana son similares.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Nathaniel Energy
Corporation


Dated  May 14, 2003                         By:  /s/  Gene Bailey
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Name:  Gene Bailey
                                                 Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                                 Nathaniel Energy Corporation
Exhibit 4. (a) 84





[State Emblem]




The State of Israel


Ministry of Communications




General License for Partner Communications Ltd. for the Provision of


Mobile Radio Telephone (MRT) Services using the Cellular Method




Amendment No. 68





By virtue of the authority of the Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the Communications Law (Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, and after having given Partner Communications Company Ltd. (hereinafter: “Partner”) the opportunity to present their arguments, I hereby amend the General License for the provision of mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the cellular method granted to Partner on 7 April 1998,  as follows:





Amendment of Article 45





1.
After sub-section 45.1 (b) shall come:





(b1)
Frequency bands that have been non-exclusively been allocated for its use as of February 25, 2010, in accordance with the rules and limitations that will be set by the Director: 912.6 Mhz to 915 Mhz and 957.6 Mhz to 960 Mhz1.




(30 December 2012)





(sgd)


________________


Moshe Cachalon


Minister of Communications








1 These frequency bands have been used by the Licensee since 1999.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v EDWARD J. KUHL, Private First Class, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

16 USCMA 193, 36 CMR 349

No. 19,193

April 8, 1966

*Captain L. G. Bohlen,*USMC, argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. *Lieutenant John P. Meade,*USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel J. E. Hanthorn,*USMC, argued the cause for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

This case was tried in common with United States v Kugima, 16 USCMA 183, 36 CMR 339, this day decided, and involves the identical issue whether the general court-martial appointed by the Chief of Staff, Third Marine Division, then acting as the Commanding Officer of that organization, was duly constituted. For the reasons set forth in the *Kugima*case, supra, we find that authority to appoint the general court-martial was present.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.
Opinion issued March 18 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00978
- CR

——————————— WILLIAM HARRIS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 876384

MEMORANDUM OPINION O n February 25 , 2014, appellant, William Harris, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. N o prior opinion has issued. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42. 2 (a). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b ).