alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal 

GREGORY M. FINCH (SBN 091237) 

Cohen ♦ Durrett LLP 

8880 Cal Center Drive, Suite 190 

Sacramento, California 95826 

Telephone: 916-361-8797 

Facsimile: 916-361-8798 

Attorneys for Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, 

JYM CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

QUESTECH FINANCIAL CALIFORNIA, 

LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JYM CORPORATION, 

 Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BASKIN- ROBBINS USA, CO.; TOGOS 

EATERIES, INC., 

 Third-Party Defendants.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CIV.S-04-2553 FCD GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

OF DISMISSAL 

STIPULATION

NOW COMES Third Party Plaintiff, JYM CORPORATION, by and through its attorney 

Gregory M. Finch, and the Third Party Defendants BASKIN-ROBBINS USA, CO. and TOGOS 

EATERIES, INC., by and through their attorney Daniel L. Egan, and as all matters in dispute 

between the parties to the above-captioned case having been satisfactorily compromised and 

settled: 

// 

Case 2:04-cv-02553-FCD-GGH Document 86 Filed 05/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal 

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, that the cause be 

dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and expenses; 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, that an 

Order pursuant to the foregoing may be entered of record without further notice to either party, 

upon presentation of this Stipulation of Dismissal; and 

WHEREFORE, the parties pray that the Court enter an Order of Dismissal, dismissing 

the Amended Third Party Complaint of Third Party Plaintiff, with prejudice. 

DATED: May 11, 2006 COHEN♦DURRETT, LLP, 

 

 GREGORY M. FINCH 

 Attorneys for Third Party Plaintiff 

 JYM CORPORATION 

 

DATED: May , 2006 Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney, LLP 

 

 _____________________________

 DANIEL L. EGAN 

 Attorney for Third Party Defendants 

 BASKIN-ROBBINS USA, CO. and 

 TOGOS EATERIES, INC. 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned matter, by stipulation and between 

the parties to this action through their designated counsel, be dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant 

to FRCP 41(a)(1). 

Dated: May 17, 2006 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

 HONORABLE FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. 

Case 2:04-cv-02553-FCD-GGH Document 86 Filed 05/17/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

November 26, 1947

No. 52052.

#### Henry Roder et al. *v.*United States,

protests 114319-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the articles in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 51130. Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact certain items of the merchandise were held dutiable at 8 cents each and 25 percent ad valorem, as hunting and similar knives, with handles of deer, or other animal horn, and other items were held dutiable at only 2 cents each and 25 percent ad valorem, as knives with, handles of wood, less than 4 inches in length, exclusive of the handle, under paragraph 355, as modified by T. D. 49753. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 15, 2022

No. 04-20-00569-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO by and through The San Antonio Water System,

Appellant

v.

CAMPBELLTON ROAD, LTD,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-13949

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s unopposed motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing is 

GRANTED. Any motion for rehearing filed by appellee is due March 14, 2022. 

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of February, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 03, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 03, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0186. LORI BELINDA HICKS et al. v. UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et 

al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

21EV000143 21EV000092 21EV000106
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of IceWEB, Inc., SEC File No. 333-183917, and the related prospectuses, of our audit report dated January 13, 2014 on the consolidated balance sheets of IceWEB, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2013 and 2012 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2013, which is included in Amendment No. 1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of IceWEB, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2013. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the prospectus.

 

 

/s/ D’Arelli Pruzansky, P.A.

Certified Public Accountants

 

 

Boca Raton, Florida

January~~~~30, 2014
1 SERVED: JULY 18, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SKYWEST AIRLINES FAADOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0292
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No.2012NM060025) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative LaSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001



### Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

### Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FPCX: 435-634-3505 ONE COPY



### Michael L. 

### Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

### MICHAEL L. 

### DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94104 TEL: 415-421-2500 FPCX: 415-421-2560 EMAIL: law@avialex.com Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mowitain Region, ANM-7 Federal AviationAdministration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FPCX: 425-227-1007 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0292 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant 

### fPC(: 202-366-7536



### -3-
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ODIS CALVIN NASH, Fireman, U. S. Navy, Appellant

12 USCMA 30, 30 CMR 30

No. 14,185

Decided November 25, 1960

*Lieutenant Eric L. Keisman*was on the brief for Appellant, Accused. *Lieutenant Martin Drobac*was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The issue presented in this case is identical to that in United States v McCormick, 12 USCMA 26, 30 CMR 26, decided this day. For the reasons expressed in that case, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.
# C_2007195EN.01001301.xml

| 23.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/13

---

Publication, pursuant to Article 12(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, concerning a cancellation application

(2007/C 195/06)

This publication confers the right to object the cancellation application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 (1). Statements of objections must reach the Commission within six months from the date of this publication.

1

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006

Cancellation request according to Article 12(2)

‘TEINACHER MINERALQUELLEN’

EC No: DE/PDO/017/1051/23.7.2003

ImagePGI ImagePDO

1.   Registered name proposed for cancellation:

‘Teinacher Mineralquellen’

2.   Member State or Third Country:

Germany

3.   Type of product:

Class 2.2: Natural mineral waters and spring waters

4.   Person or body making request for cancellation:

| Name: | Mineralbrunnen Überkingen Teinach AG |
| --- | --- |
| Address: | D-73337 Bad Überkingen |

Name:

Mineralbrunnen Überkingen Teinach AG

Address:

D-73337 Bad Überkingen

Nature of legitimate interest in making the request:

The applicant is the only producer of the protected name.

5.   Reasons for Cancellation:

The applicant has decided that it no longer wants to use the name as a protected designation of origin and therefore no longer wants to pay the control costs.

---

(1)  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

---
82°;W 80°w 78°W 76°W 7T4°wW
1 1 1 n 1

72°;W 70°W 68°W
1 i 1

46°N-

44°N-4

42°N-

40°N-

38°N4

CANADA

36°N4

34°N-4

32°N-4J

30°N4J

28°N-4

26°N-

24°N-4

North Atlantic
Planning Area

[-46°N

-44°N

-42°N

Mid Atlantic
Planning Area
GA
South Atlantic
+ Planning Area are for initial planning purposes
poceocary let
Meise eran
re Siraits of Flora ATLANTIC NAD 83 FEDERAL
Wee N OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF (OCS)
es ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES
: J) A LEGEND

: s mite ;

— Planning Areas
——— Offshore Administrative Boundaries
———~ U.S. 200 NM Limit

BOEM

Bextor Oca Execr Manceu
Projection Geographic

North American Datum 1983 January, 2010

-38°N

-36°N

-34°N

-32°N

-30°N

-28°N

-26°N

-24°N

Le
foe CUBA ete

T T T
82°;W 80°wW 73°W 76°w

T T T T
7T2°W 70°W 68°W 66°W
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on(i) Form S-16 (Nos. 2-51894, 2-55664, 2-63470 and 2-75654), (ii) Form S-8 (Nos.2-77752, 33-10747, 33-24934, 33-33018, 33-54403, 33-54443, 33-54555, 333-08059, 333-08087,333-60839, 333-42178, 333-53908, 333-74864, 33-46999, 333-122345**,** and 333-104264),(iii) Form S-3 (Nos. 2-84910, 33-26314, 33-23880, 33-42698, 33-44871, 33-45091,33-54317, 33-69432, 333-04385, 333-40869, 333-44421, 333-55921, 333-68257, 333-54896,333-55866, 333-91257, 333-91316-02, 333-102963, 333-102962-02, and 333-122555-01) and(iv) Form S-4 (No. 333-102873) of Kinder Morgan, Inc. of our report dated March 4,2005 relating to the financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K, and of our report dated March 4,2005 relating to the financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., which appears in Kinder MorganEnergy Partners, L.P.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K which is incorporated by reference inthis Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, TexasMarch 4, 2005
Case No. 15,079.

#### UNITED STATES v. FAW.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 487.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1808.

Constable—Right to Break Doors.

A constable, having a warrant to arrest a man for assault and battery, has a right to break open the door of the offender’s dwelling-house to arrest him.

Indictment for not doing all in his power to prevent a riot, whereby a man was killed. [For prior proceedings in this suit, see Case No. 15,078.]

Mr. Jones, for the United States,

prayed the court to instruct the jury, that neither the constable nor the magistrate had a right to break open the door of the house inhabited by a man, to arrest him upon a warrant for an assault and battery,

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch. Chief Judged

Which

THE COURT

refused

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent).

The jury found the defendant not guilty.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELLIS CLAY HOLLIS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2574 MCE GGH P

vs.

DAVID L. RUNNELS, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner’s counsel has requested a third extension of time to file an amended

petition pursuant to the court’s order of February 1, 2005. Petitioner’s August 17, 2005 request

is not made in accordance with the local rules in that the request does not include a proposed

order emailed in wordprocessing format. In order for the court to consider petitioner’s counsel’s

request, counsel must comply with Local Rule 5-137(b). 

This is the second time petitioner has failed to be in full compliance with the

Local Rules in filing/emailing a proposed order. See Order filed on April 25, 2005. Should this

occur again, the request will simply be denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 8/24/05 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:009 holl2574.ord2

Case 2:04-cv-02574-MCE -GGH Document 24 Filed 08/24/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 50493.

#### Protests 84224-K, etc., of Fujimoto Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In view of stipulation and the cited authorities, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) The portion marked *“A”*on the invoices, similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nippon Co.*(32 C. C. P. A. 164, C. A. D. 303), held free of duty under paragraph 1705 as kelp; (2) the portion marked “B” on the invoices, similar to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nippon Co., supra,*held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1540 as seaweeds, manufactured; and (3) the portion marked “C” on the invoices, the same as that the subject of *Mutual Supply Co.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 136, C. D. 842), held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 775, as modified by the trade agreement with the Netherlands (T. D. 48075), as onions, pickled or packed in brine. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Before the First Division,

December 11, 1946

No. 51460.

#### Protests 106879-K, etc., of Oscar A. Hertzwig et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOANG MONG LE,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2522 LKK DAD P

vs.

JOHN ASHCROFT, et al., 

Respondents. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner, who is represented by counsel, filed an amended application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On February 28, 2005, respondents filed a

motion to dismiss the amended petition as moot. Respondents contend that petitioner was

released and is no longer in the custody of the Bureau of U.S. Immigration and Customs

Enforcement. On May 19, 2005, petitioner’s counsel filed a response to the court’s order to

show cause and indicates there is no opposition to respondents’ motion to dismiss. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

1. Respondents’ February 28, 2005 motion to dismiss be granted; and 

2. This action be dismissed as moot.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

Case 2:04-cv-02522-LKK -DAD Document 17 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 27, 2005.

DAD:4

le2522.157

Case 2:04-cv-02522-LKK -DAD Document 17 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [TD 9264] 
          - RIN 1545-BG49 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Correction notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to final and temporary regulations (TD 9264) that were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 (71 FR 30591) affecting taxpayers that file Federal income tax returns. They simplify, clarify, or eliminate reporting burdens and also eliminate regulatory impediments to the electronic filing of certain statements that taxpayers are required to include on or with their Federal income tax returns.                     

# DATES:

The correction is effective May 30, 2006. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Grid Glyer, (202) 622-7930 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The final and temporary regulations that are the subject of the correction are under sections 279, 302, 331, 332, 338, 351, 355, 368, 381, 382, 1081, 1221, 1502, 1563, and 6012 of the Internal Revenue Code. 

## Need for Correction 

As published, final and temporary regulations (TD 9264) contain an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification. 

## Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of the final and temporary regulations (TD 9264), which were the subject of FR Doc. 06-4873, is corrected as follows: 

On page 30591, in the document heading, the language “RIN 1545-BF26” is corrected to read “RIN 1545-BG49”. 

LaNita Van Dyke, 

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. E7-4962 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4135

_____________________________ C HRISTOPHER N ATHANIEL B ROWN ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Emergency Petition for a Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction

. June 22, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition is D ENIED without prejudice to P etitioner ’ s ability to raise the affirmative defense of self

- defense at trial. See Mederos v. State , 102 So. 3d 7, 11 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

L EWIS , R OBERTS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Patricia Kyser, Assistant Regional Counsel, Jacksonville
, for Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steve Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
No. 53039.

#### Marshall, Field & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 745463-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D. 239), the protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4552]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Part 385

[Docket No. RM02-11-000]


Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule: Order No. 692; 
Order Redesignating Proceeding

Issued February 16, 2007.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Final rule: order redesignating proceeding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 5, 2002, the Commission issued a final rule for a 
Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment as mandated by the Debt 
Collection Improvement Act of 1996. The final rule was designated 
``Order No. 890''. The Commission is redesignating ``Order No. 890'' as 
``Order No. 692''.

DATES: Effective Date: February 16, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Secretary's Office, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, 
(202) 502-8400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 5, 2002, the Commission issued 
``Order No. 890, Final Rule'' in the above-captioned proceeding. Civil 
Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule, 100 FERC ] 61,159 (2002).
    By this order the Commission redesignates the above-captioned 
proceeding as Order No. 692, Final Rule.

    By direction of the Commission.
Nora E. Donovan,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4552 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
(LOGO)NORTH AMERICAN MORTGAGE COMPANY
A DIME COMPANY

5100 West Lemon Street
Suite 109
Tampa, FL 33609
813-636-2902
Fax 813-636-2961

Management Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, North American  Mortgage Company
(the Company) has complied in all material respects with the minimum  servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's  Uniform
Single  Attestation  Program  for Mortgage  Bankers.  As of and for this same
period,  the  Company had in effect a  fidelity bond and errors and  omissions
policy in the following amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999:

Fidelity Bond

$100,000,000 from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999

Errors and Omissions

$20,000,000 from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999

Raymond G. Romano
SVP/Director of Residential Credit


3/27/00
Date