alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNet Group Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies that, to his knowledge:





the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




/s/ MICHAEL HANSENMichael HansenPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





Date: March 30, 2011


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNet Group Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies that, to his knowledge:




the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report





/s/ MARK MROCZKOWSKIMark MroczkowskiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)




Date: March 30, 2011
#### In the Matter of Gerald Gaines, Petitioner, v George Bartlett, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[634 NYS2d 413]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges an administrative determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from interfering with prison employees. Subsequent to his commencement of this CPLR article 78 proceeding, this determination was administratively reversed and all references expunged from petitioner’s records. In view of this, we find that the matter is now moot and need not address the merits of petitioner’s claims.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CanoPetroleum, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Ricketts, Principal AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in theReport.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as anexhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K andSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 202 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and,accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 
| November 14, 2006 | /s/ Michael J. Ricketts      |   |
|-------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|              | Michael J. Ricketts          |   |
|              | Principal Accounting Officer |   |

 

----
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 3

- NM

- 04 0

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
**Exhibit23.2**

**Consent of Independent****Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of DirectorsWitness Systems, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements(No. 333-33250, No. 333-107236, No. 333-67416, No. 333-122411, and No.333-127397) on Form S-8 of Witness Systems, Inc. of our reports dated March 30,2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Witness Systems, Inc.and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss),and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December31, 2006, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessmentof the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006annual report on Form 10-K of Witness Systems, Inc.

Ourreport dated March 30, 2007 on the consolidated financial statements referredto above refers to a change in the Company’s method of accounting forshare-based compensation upon adoption of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 123(R), *Share-BasedPayment,*effective January1, 2006, and a change in the Company’s method of quantifying errors uponadoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, *Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatementswhen Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements,*effective December 31, 2006*.*

Our report dated March 30, 2007, on management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2006, expresses our opinion that Witness Systems, Inc. did not maintaineffective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006because of the effect of material weaknesses described in such report.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, GeorgiaMarch 30, 2007

 

----
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-11-00706- CV Dam ian Mand ola and Trina Mand ola, Appellan ts v. DuchMandola, L td. n/k/a Duchm an, Ltd., Ap pellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F H AY S CO UNTY, 428 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 11- 1142 , H ONO RAB LE WI LLIAM H ENRY, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appea l. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appe al. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

____________________________________ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Henson a nd Goodwin Dismissed on J oint Moti on Filed: Apr il 18, 2012
#### G. K. Scott & Co. et al., Respondents, v Susan Kross et al., Appellants.

[634 NYS2d 466]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on June 17, 1994, which, *inter alia,*granted the individual petitioners’ application to stay arbitration, is unanimously reversed, on the law, and the petition is denied, without costs.

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on August 24,1994, which denied respondents-appellants’ motion for reargument or renewal, is unanimously dismissed as academic in light of the foregoing, without costs.

Petitioners John Kevorkian and George Kevorkian are individual registered representatives and are alleged to be "controlling persons” of G. K. Scott & Co., in which appellants maintained retail brokerage accounts. Appellants commenced an arbitration proceeding against G. K. Scott and against John Kevorkian and George Kevorkian charging stock price manipulation in thinly traded issues, where Scott allegedly controlled the market by allegedly exercising prearranged trades and discouraging sales orders in issues sold by G. K. Scott to appellants. The demand for arbitration also names John Kevorkian and George Kevorkian as respondents on the ground that they are controlling persons under section 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 USC § 78t [a]), and are therefore subject to arbitration pursuant to section 12 (a) of the National Association of Securities Dealers Code of Arbitration Procedure. The Supreme Court granted the petition to stay arbitration on the ground that neither George Kevorkian nor John Kevorkian were directly involved in handling appellants’ accounts. This was error. Based upon the prima facie showing in this record that George Kevorkian and John Kevorkian are "controlling persons” of G. K. Scott, and the allegations that appellants were injured by their allegedly fraudulent activities, George Kevorkian and John Kevorkian are proper parties to the arbitration *(see, McMahan Sec. Co. v Forum Capital Mkts.,*35 F3d 82 [2d Cir 1994]). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Asch, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a)AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MedAssets, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: May 7, 2010/s/ John A. Bardis

John A. BardisChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0147

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ALEXANDER GARRETT LAFORGE III,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 20, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 13 2024

08/13/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0147
Case No. 8,464.

#### In re LOGAN.

[Cited in Miller v. Jones, Case No. 9.575. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
<page>

									           EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin
Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation,
the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

     (2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partner-
ship.







By:	/s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:		Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2005
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
CREDIT CORPORATION

January 7, 2000

As of and for the year ended  December  31,  1999,  Morgan  Stanley  Dean Witter
Credit  Corporation  (the "Company") has complied in all material  respects with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for
this same period, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., the Company's parent, had in
effect a fidelity  bond in excess of $25  million  and an errors  and  omissions
policy in excess of $25 million under which the Company was covered.


Nancy S. Donovan
President

Leroy Hodo
Vice President and Controller



2500 Lake Cook Road. 3 West. Riverwoods. Illinois 60015
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of IceWEB, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, John R. Signorello, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





December
      29, 2008
                /s/ John R. SignorelloJohn
      R. Signorello, Chief Executive Officer and
                  principal
      executive officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007196EN.01001001.xml

| 24.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/10

---

Communication from the Commission on the proposal to amend Council Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 on the common organisation of the markets in flax and hemp grown for fibre to extend the current scheme by one year

(2007/C 196/05)

Under Council Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 of 27 July 2000 on the common organisation of the markets in flax and hemp grown for fibre (1), aid for short flax fibre and hemp fibre is to cease at the end of the 2007/2008 marketing year. Under Article 15(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000, the Commission is to submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council assessing the impact of processing aid on producers by the end of the 2007/2008 marketing year. The Commission is proposing a further extension of the current system by one year and an in-depth assessment of the sector in the framework of the single payment scheme review, as requested by the Council in June 2003, which is to take place in 2008. The Commission plans to submit a report and a legislative proposal to the Council before the start of the new (2008/2009) marketing year.

1

In the Commission's view, the extension of the current scheme will allow a more in-depth analysis and leave sufficient time to complete an impact assessment in order to evaluate the possibility of simplifying this aid scheme by integrating it into the general framework of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers (2).

2

If the Council were to accept, the extension of the scheme to the end of the 2008/2009 marketing year would involve maintaining aid to long flax fibre at the present level of EUR 160 per tonne and aid to short flax fibre and hemp fibre at EUR 90 per tonne. As for the national guaranteed quantities, the current levels would continue to apply.

As regards the maximum content of impurities and shives, since most Member States derogate from the 7,5 % limit and certain end uses require a high level of impurities, the current system should be maintained to permit the Member States to grant aid for short flax fibre containing no more than 15 % of impurities and shives and for hemp fibre containing no more than 25 %.

The additional aid granted to primary processors of long flax fibre in certain traditional production areas of the Netherlands, Belgium and France would remain unchanged at EUR 120 per hectare in zone I and EUR 50 per hectare in zone II.

The cost of this extension is an estimated EUR 5,07 million. If the total national guaranteed quantities were to be used the maximum financial impact would be EUR 12,02 million.

---

(1)  OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 953/2006 (OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 552/2007 (OJ L 131, 23.5.2007, p. 10).

2

---
#### Otis N. Cutler, *Respondent, v.*John Satterlee, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Motion denied, without costs.
#### Riverhead Food Market, Inc., Respondent, v Taddeus Zalewski et al., Appellants.

[635 NYS2d 492]

—In an action to recover a down payment, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated August 1, 1994, which denied their motion to vacate a default judgment dated May 25, 1994.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court found that the proffered excuse of law office failure was not a reasonable excuse for the defendants’ default. Under the circumstances of this case we discern no improvident exercise of discretion in the Supreme Court’s rejection of this excuse *(see, Fennell v Mason,*204 AD2d 599; *Putney v Pearlman,*203 AD2d 333).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Cano Petroleum, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, S. Jeffrey Johnson,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuantto Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 202 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| February 8, 2008 |
|-----------------------|
|                  |   |
|                  | /s/ S. Jeffrey Johnson |   |
|                  | S. Jeffrey Johnson |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40033 Conference Calendar

__________________ CHARLES E. GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus A. SMITH, L. Woods, UNKNOWN NAMES PRISON OFFICIALS Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-C-94-172

- - - - - - - - - - June 29, 1995 Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), Charles E. Gray was not entitled to conduct discovery prior to dismissal of his complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Gray failed to establish that any defendant was deliberately indifferent to Gray's serious medical need or safety. See Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976); Farmer
v. Brennan , 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1979 (1994). Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint.No. 9 -2-

AFFIRMED.
No. 42920.

#### Protest 747688-G of Baltimore Clipper Importing Co. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of letter openers, blotter pads, book ends, weights, hammers (nut crackers), corners, and stamp boxes. On the authority of Abstracts 42391, 42350, 42526, 34018, and 29772 the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.