alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. 4610 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four 

An Act 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to designate the bald eagle as the national 

bird. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF BALD EAGLE AS NATIONAL BIRD. 

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that— 

(1) bald eagles are a historical symbol of the United States 

representing independence, strength, and freedom; 

(2) the bald eagle is unique to North America; 

(3) on June 20, 1782, the bald eagle was adopted as the 

Coat of Arms for the United States Great Seal; 

(4) the bald eagle image remains the leading insignia for 

all branches of the United States military; 

(5) the bald eagle is the leading image on thousands of 

Federal Government branches, departments, and agencies, 

including the President, Vice-President, Congress, and Senate; 

(6) the bald eagle serves as the logo, trademark, and brand 

icon for businesses, nonprofit organizations, and sports teams 

across the United States; 

(7) bald eagles are integral to the spiritual lives and sacred 

belief systems of most Indigenous peoples and Tribal communities; 

(8) bald eagles are prevalent in belief, practice, stories, 

ceremonies, dance, traditions, songs, regalia, flags, insignias, 

arts, craft, and other forms of spiritual reverence; 

(9) bald eagle festivals are— 

(A) held in over 100 locations across the United States; 

and 

(B) key components of community engagement; 

(10) the bald eagle is prevalent on— 

(A) hundreds of United States stamps; and 

(B) many United States coins and currencies; 

(11) the bald eagle is a primary component and symbol 

on Federal and State flags throughout the United States; and 

(12) joint efforts of the Federal Government and State 

and local governments, nonprofit organizations, and individuals 

have contributed to the successful recovery of the bald eagle. 

(b) DESIGNATION.—Chapter 3 of title 36, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘§ 306. National bird 

‘‘The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is the national 

bird.’’. 
S. 4610—2 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections for 

chapter 3 of title 36, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in the chapter heading, by striking ‘‘AND TREE’’ and 

inserting ‘‘TREE, AND BIRD’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘306. National bird.’’. 

(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section, the 

amendments made by this section, or the adoption of the bald 

eagle as the national bird of the United States may be construed 

or used as a reason to alter, change, modify, or otherwise affect 

any plan, policy, management decision, regulation, or other action 

of the Federal Government. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Scapple,
Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, I, David Feuerborn, Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Scapple, Inc. hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Capital Ventures Group I Inc.

|By: | /s/   David FeuerbornDavid FeuerbornPrincipal Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 19, 2005
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eric Boehnke, President, Director, and Principal Executive
  Officer of Huron Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that,
  to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB,
        of the Company for the nine month period ended March 31, 2004, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Quarterly Report"),
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
        Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in this Quarterly
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                

/s/ Eric Boehnke
  Eric Boehnke 
  President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director

May 11, 2004

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and No. 2:04-cv-1955-MCE-PAN (JFM)

the STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

ex rel. MIKE STIERLI,

Relator Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

SHASTA SERVICES INC. dba

TIMBERWORKS; and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive,

Qui Tam Defendants.

----oo0oo----

Following the Court’s review of Qui Tam Plaintiff Mike

Stierli’s Ex Parte Application for an order vacating or

continuing the Motion to Dismiss filed by the State of

California, and after the Order denying that Application was

prepared, counsel for the United States of America filed a

joinder in the State’s Motion that also included a separate

Motion to Dismiss the federal claims asserted in this proceeding. 

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01955-MCE -PAN Document 59 Filed 04/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Given that related motion, filed on April 17, 2006 and scheduled

to be heard simultaneously with the State’s Motion on May 1,

2006, the Court hereby continues the hearing on both motions to

June 5, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. in order to give all parties reasonable

opportunity to serve ane file oppositions and replies to the

pending motions. See Local Rule 78-230 (c)-(e). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 24, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01955-MCE -PAN Document 59 Filed 04/24/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES ARTHUR HAROLSON,

NO. CIV. S-04-2128 LKK/PAN P

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

JIM POPE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, James Harolson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se,

has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order

No. 262. The magistrate judge recommended that this action be

dismissed for failure to state a claim. For the reasons set forth

in this order, the court adopts the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation. 

As the magistrate judge notes, to state a claim under 42

U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff must allege that defendant deprived him

Case 2:04-cv-02128-LKK -PAN Document 9 Filed 08/05/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1 Plaintiff’s complaint in this action does not make clear

the subject of his small claims suit, requiring further

investigation on the part of this court. 

2 The Supreme Court noted that “impairment of any other

litigating capacity is simply one of the incidental (and perfectly

constitutional) consequences of conviction and incarceration.” 

Lewis, 518 U.S. at 355.

2

of a right secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United

States while acting under color of state law. See West v. Atkins,

487 U.S. 42, 48-49 (1988). Plaintiff asserts that members of the

Shasta County Marshal’s and Sheriff’s offices interfered with his

ability to pursue a small claims action in a Shasta County Court

because they did not arrive to take him to court. This court has

confirmed with the Shasta County Small Claims division that

plaintiff’s small claims action is related to property which was

allegedly stolen from him and a cash loan, and thus is not related

to his conviction or his conditions of confinement.1 Plaintiff

does not have a constitutional right to pursue such an action.

The Ninth Circuit has explained that a prisoner has a right

of access to the courts to litigate only claims which challenge his

subsequent conviction, or concerns the conditions of a his

confinement. Simmons v. Sacramento Superior Court, 318 F.3d 1156,

1160 (9th Cir. 2003)(citing Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 341 (1996)).2

Because plaintiff’s small claims action is wholly unrelated to his

conviction and the conditions of his confinement, plaintiff does

not have a constitutional right of access to pursue such a claim.

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-02128-LKK -PAN Document 9 Filed 08/05/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

Accordingly, this matter is DISMISSED for failure to state a

claim upon which relief can be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 4, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02128-LKK -PAN Document 9 Filed 08/05/05 Page 3 of 3
# C_2007103EN.01000601.xml

| 8.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/6

---

Renewal of the term of office of members of the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture

(2007/C 103/06)

The term of office of the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture was renewed by Commission Decision 2004/864/EC (1) amending Decision 1999/478/EC (2) renewing the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture.

1

2

The term of office for a member of the Committee is three years and is renewable. Accordingly, the term of office of the members of the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture set up on 1 May 2004 is due to expire on 30 April 2007.

The Commission has therefore decided to renew the membership of the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture for the period from 1 May 2007 to 30 April 2010 as follows:

| CFP INTEREST GROUPS | SEATS | MEMBERS |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The Committee | | Full members | Alternate members |
| Private shipowners | 1 | Mr B. Deas | Mr J. M. González Gil de Bernabé |
| Cooperative shipowners | 1 | Mr G. Van Balsfoort | Mr J. R. Fuertes Gamundi |
| Producers' organisations | 1 | Mr C. Olesen | Mr S. O'Donoghue |
| Mollusc/shellfish farmers | 1 | Mr G. Fucci | Mr A. Baekgaard |
| Fish farmers | 1 | Mr I. Stephanis | Mr P. A. Salvador |
| Processors | 1 | Mr G. Pastoor | Mr P. Commere |
| Traders | 1 | Mr P. Bamberger | Mr T. F. Geoghegan |
| Fishermen and employees | 1 | Mr R. Otero | Mr A. Macedo |
| Consumers | 1 | Mr J. Godfrey | |
| Environment | 1 | Mr E. Dunn | Mrs C. Phua |
| Development | 1 | Mr J. Guyen | Mrs B. Gorez |
| Working groups | | Chair | Vice-Chair |
| Group I | 2 | Mr J. Garat Pérez | Mr J. L. de Feuardent |
| Group II | 2 | Mr R. Flynn | Mr G. Brest |
| Group III | 2 | Mr M. Keller | Mr J. A. Suárez Llanos |
| Group IV | 2 | Mr N. Wichmann | Mr J. A. Mozos |

CFP INTEREST GROUPS

SEATS

MEMBERS

The Committee

Full members

Alternate members

Private shipowners

1

Mr B. Deas

Mr J. M. González Gil de Bernabé

Cooperative shipowners

1

Mr G. Van Balsfoort

Mr J. R. Fuertes Gamundi

Producers' organisations

1

Mr C. Olesen

Mr S. O'Donoghue

Mollusc/shellfish farmers

1

Mr G. Fucci

Mr A. Baekgaard

Fish farmers

1

Mr I. Stephanis

Mr P. A. Salvador

Processors

1

Mr G. Pastoor

Mr P. Commere

Traders

1

Mr P. Bamberger

Mr T. F. Geoghegan

Fishermen and employees

1

Mr R. Otero

Mr A. Macedo

Consumers

1

Mr J. Godfrey

Environment

1

Mr E. Dunn

Mrs C. Phua

Development

1

Mr J. Guyen

Mrs B. Gorez

Working groups

Chair

Vice-Chair

Group I

2

Mr J. Garat Pérez

Mr J. L. de Feuardent

Group II

2

Mr R. Flynn

Mr G. Brest

Group III

2

Mr M. Keller

Mr J. A. Suárez Llanos

Group IV

2

Mr N. Wichmann

Mr J. A. Mozos

---

(1)  OJ L 370, 17.12.2004, p. 91.

1

(2)  OJ L 187, 20.7.1999, p. 70.

2

---
Exhibit 23.2

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors
Witness Systems, Inc.

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-33250 and No. 333-67416) on Form S-8 of Witness
Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Witness Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, and the related
schedule, which reports appear in the Witness Systems, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 2003.

|                                |  | /s/ KPMG LLP
|------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Atlanta, Georgia
March 10, 2004 |  |             

---

QuickLinks
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-80,412-01 AND WR-80,412-02

EX PARTE CESAR GARZA, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 1996CR5971W-W1 AND 1996CR5972W-W1

IN THE 290TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offenses

of aggravated assault and possession of a controlled substance and was sentenced to imprisonment. 

This Court has received the trial court’s findings addressing the merits of Applicant’s claims.

The trial court indicates in the findings that an evidentiary hearing was held in which testimony was

given. The habeas record does not contain a copy of the transcription of the testimony. The trial court

shall orderthe Bexar CountyDistrict Clerk to supplement the habeas record to this Court with a copy

of the transcription, which shall be forwarded to this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. 

Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: July 23, 2014

Do not publish
### I-1 

## LCC IC OC

r t t 

## = + + ∑ ( ) 1 (5.1) APPENDIX I: ERRATA APPENDIX I.1 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 4 page 4-12: Table 4.8 Revised Reverse Engineering Production Cost Multipliers for 3-ton Unitary Equipment Efficiency Level (SEER) Split Air

Conditioner (cased coil) Split Air

Conditioner (fancoil) Split Heat Pump Packaged Air Conditioner Packaged Heat Pump Original Revised Original Revised Original Revised Original Revised Original Revised 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 1.12 1.12 1.21 1.16 -- 1.05 -- 1.09 -- 1.08 12 1.28 1.28 -- 1.25 1.11 1.13 1.14 1.16 1.10 1.13 13 1.44 1.44 1.66 1.42 1.35 1.30 1.47 1.43 -- 1.38 14 1.60 1.60 1.76 1.82 1.63 1.79 -- 1.74 -- 1.74 15 -- -- 1.96 1.99 1.84 1.94 -- 1.87 -- 1.86 

### page 4-23: Replace first sentence, first paragraph with the following: The highest efficiency level that is “technologically feasible” is known as “Max Tech.” page 4-36: Replace last sentence, first paragraph with the following: However, along with other potential drawbacks, not being applicable to indoor coil and heat pump applications limits its potential use to cooling-only condensers. I.2 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 5 page 5-9:

### I-2 

## U year age U year age U U movals tired movals age tired age Re Re Re Re 

## ( , ) ( , )

= ⋅ ∑ ∑ =

= 1 30

1 30 

### (6.6) 

## ( ) ( ) PBP years butt Re 

### $2510 $2243

$355 $310 . = −

− = 5 8



# ( ) 

# [ ] Prob Price
- PWF * OS) Income 

## = + − + ⋅ 

## 1 1 a b 

## e ( 

### (6.24) page 5-65: Replace first sentence, first paragraph with the following: The assumed annualized repair cost for baseline efficiency central air-conditioning and heat pump equipment (i.e., the cost the consumer pays annually for repairing equipment ) and equipment with efficiencies greater than 13 SEER are based on the following expression: page 5-111:

I.3 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 6 page 6-9:

page 6-23:

### I-3 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 020062011201620212026

YearJobs (Thousands)

Trial Standard 1 Trial Standard 2 Trial Standard 3 Trial Standard 4 Trial Standard 5



### Figure 12.3 Employment Impacts of Changes in Equipment Cost I.4 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 12 page 12-5:
No. 42904.

#### Protests 896208-G, etc., of S. Lisk & Bro. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of paperweights and antimony pincushions plated with silver. The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained on the authority of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20) and Abstract 38366.
# C_2007141EN.01002701.xml

| 26.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/27

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92

Modification by Italy of the public service obligation in respect of the following scheduled air services: Alghero-Bologna, Alghero-Turin, Cagliari-Bologna, Cagliari-Turin, Cagliari-Florence, Cagliari-Verona, Cagliari-Naples, Cagliari-Palermo, Olbia-Bologna and Olbia-Verona

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 141/12)

In accordance with Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes (1), the Italian Government has decided to modify the public service obligation in respect of the following scheduled air services: Alghero-Bologna, Alghero-Turin, Cagliari-Bologna, Cagliari-Turin, Cagliari-Florence, Cagliari-Verona, Cagliari-Naples, Cagliari-Palermo, Olbia-Bologna and Olbia-Verona, published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 93, 21.4.2006, p. 13, concerning point 4.1 on the fares applicable to these routes.

1

Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with point 4.5 of the public service obligation, the fares are revised as follows:

| Route | Maximum concessionary fare | Maximum non-concessionary fare |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Alghero-Bologna or vice versa | EUR 56 | EUR 99 |
| Alghero-Turin or vice versa | EUR 56 | EUR 99 |
| Cagliari-Bologna and vice versa | EUR 56 | EUR 99 |
| Cagliari-Turin or vice versa | EUR 56 | EUR 99 |
| Cagliari-Florence and vice versa | EUR 56 | EUR 99 |
| Cagliari-Verona and vice versa | EUR 56 | EUR 99 |
| Cagliari-Naples and vice versa | EUR 56 | EUR 99 |
| Cagliari-Palermo and vice versa | EUR 56 | EUR 99 |
| Olbia-Bologna and vice versa | EUR 56 | EUR 99 |
| Olbia-Verona and vice versa | EUR 56 | EUR 99 |

Route

Maximum concessionary fare

Maximum non-concessionary fare

Alghero-Bologna or vice versa

EUR 56

EUR 99

Alghero-Turin or vice versa

EUR 56

EUR 99

Cagliari-Bologna and vice versa

EUR 56

EUR 99

Cagliari-Turin or vice versa

EUR 56

EUR 99

Cagliari-Florence and vice versa

EUR 56

EUR 99

Cagliari-Verona and vice versa

EUR 56

EUR 99

Cagliari-Naples and vice versa

EUR 56

EUR 99

Cagliari-Palermo and vice versa

EUR 56

EUR 99

Olbia-Bologna and vice versa

EUR 56

EUR 99

Olbia-Verona and vice versa

EUR 56

EUR 99

The other requirements of the public service obligation published in OJ C 93, 21.4.2006, p. 13, remain unchanged.

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 8.

1

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALONZO REED, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1822 LKK DAD P

vs.

S. PETERSON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 27, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

by proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-01822-LKK -DAD Document 32 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 27, 2006, are adopted in full;

and 

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to state a

cognizable claim. 

DATED: July 6, 2006.

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/reed1822.804

Case 2:04-cv-01822-LKK -DAD Document 32 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2