alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A1 42 5 . KEMI EL OBRYAN DOW NER v . THE STATE.

In No v em ber 2 0 1 8, Kem i el Ob ry an Do wn er, wh i l e re pr e se n te d by c oun s el

, was

co n vi ct ed of two co u n ts o f ag g rav at ed as s au lt

. Do wn er’ s tri al co un s el fi l ed a t i m el y

m o ti o n fo r new tri al

. Th erea f t e r , D o w n er o b t ai n ed n ew co un s el

, wh o fi l ed an

am en d ed m o t i o n fo r n ew t ri al

. Th e t r i a l c o u r t en tered a wri t t en o rd er d en y i n g t h e

m o ti o n fo r n ew t ri al o n Jan uary 1 0

, 2 0 2 2

. Do wn er fi l ed a pro s e n o t i ce o f ap p eal o n

Feb ru ary 7 , 2 0 2 2 . Th e St at e h as fi l ed a m ot io n t o d i s m i s s t h e ap p eal

.

“ A cri m i n al d efen d an t i n Geo rg i a d o es no t h av e th e ri g ht t o rep res en t h i m s el f

an d al s o b e rep res en t ed b y an at t o rn ey , an d pro s e fi li ng s b y rep res en ted p art i es are

t h erefo re u n au t h o ri zed an d wi t h o u t effect .” To l b er t v. To o l e , 2 9 6 Ga. 3 5 7

, 3 6 3 (3 )

(7 6 7 SE2 d 2 4 ) (2 0 1 4) (p un ct u at i o n o m i t t ed ). Here, th e reco rd s h o ws t h at Do wn er was

rep res en t ed b y co un s el at th e t i m e t h e t ri al co u rt en t ered i t s o rd er d en y i ng h i s m o t i o n

fo r n ew t ri al

, an d n o t h in g i n t h e reco rd i n d i cat es th at co u n s el ei t her wi t h d rew o r was

r e l i e v e d f ro m rep res en t i n g Do wn er. See W h it e v. S ta t e , 30 2 Ga. 31 5

, 31 9 (2 ) (8 0 6

SE2 d 48 9 ) (2 0 1 7 ) (reject i n g d efen dan t ’ s arg u m en t t h at rep res en t at i o n t erm i n at es

u p o n en t ry o f ju d g m en t a n d r e c o g n i zi n g th at a d efen s e co u ns el ’ s d u t i es t o ward a

cl i en t ex t en d f

o r at l eas t t h e 3 0 d ay s aft er t h e en t ry o f ju d g m en t wh en a n o t i ce o f

a p peal m ay b e fi l ed ). Un der t h es e ci rcu m s t an ces , Do wn er’ s p ro s e n o ti ce o f ap p eal

i s a l eg al n u ll i t y an d m

u st b e d i s m i s s e d

. See S

o b er an i s v. S ta t e , 3 4 5 Ga. Ap p

. 4 0 3,

4 0 5 (8 12 SE2 d 8 0 0 ) (2 0 1 8 ). August 03, 2022Acco rd i ng l y , t h e St at e’ s m o t io n t o d i sm i s s i s GRANTED, an d t h i s ap p ea l i s

h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t l a n ta

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 08/03/2022
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report
of East Coast Diversified Corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kayode Aladesuyi, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |     |                                                                                                          | 
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: August 14, 2012 | By: | /s/ Kayode Aladesuyi                                                                                     | 
|                      |     | Kayode Aladesuyi                                                                                         | 
|                      |     | Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
        East Coast Diversified Corporation | 
|                      |     |                                                                                                          |
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Labonte,
Inc. for the quarter Ended September 30, 2003, I, Bernie McGinn, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Labonte, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
          30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Labonte, Inc.


Dated:  July 7, 2004


LABONTE, INC.

By: /s/ Bernie McGinn
---------------------------
Bernie McGinn
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of AcuNetx, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.




Date:
      April 12, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Robert S.
      Corrigan
              Robert
      S. Corrigan,
              President
      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer





This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed "FILED" by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002. In connection with the Quarterly Report of HLI Operating Company, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James A. Yost, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ JAMES A. YOSTJames A. YostVice President,
Finance and Chief Financial Officer
 Date: December 15, 2004 50
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN WASHINGTON WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2291 FCD KJM P

vs.

RICHARD SANDHAM, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed three documents in which plaintiff complains about access to

his legal documents and access to the law library at his prison. See Docket Entries #29, #30 and

#32. Plaintiff asks that the court order staff at plaintiff’s prison to return plaintiff’s legal property

and to provide plaintiff with access to his prison’s law library. Plaintiff’s requests will be denied

as plaintiff has not indicated precisely why he needs the documents he seeks and why he requires

access to the prison law library at this stage of this case. Plaintiff is informed that if he seeks

similar relief in the future he must explain in specific terms how and why the actions of prison

staff are impeding his ability to litigate this case.

Plaintiff also seeks extensions of time to submit the documents necessary for

service of process on defendant Sandham and to respond to the motion for summary judgment

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02291-FCD-KJM Document 37 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

filed by defendants Rohlfing, Bates and Winter. Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s requests will

be granted. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff requests for an order directing staff at plaintiff’s prison to provide

plaintiff with certain legal documents and access to the prison law library are denied.

2. Plaintiff’s June 1, 2006 request for an extension of time to submit the

documents necessary for service of process on defendant Sandham is granted. 

3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to submit

the documents necessary for service of process on defendant Sandham.

4. Plaintiff’s July 12, 2006 request for an extension of time to file an opposition

to the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Rohlfing, Bates and Winter is granted.

5. Plaintiff is granted sixty days within which to file an opposition to the motion

for summary judgment filed by defendants Rohlfing, Bates and Winter.

6. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: August 1, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1/mp

will2291.36

Case 2:04-cv-02291-FCD-KJM Document 37 Filed 08/02/06 Page 2 of 2
# C_2007159EN.01000201.xml

| 12.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 159/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 22.5.2007 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | NN 5/07 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | Nuoro |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aiuto al salvataggio del Gruppo Legler |
| Legal basis | Decreto legge n. 35 del 17 marzo 2005, modificato dalla legge del 14 maggio 2005«Fondo per il finanziamento degli interventi consentiti dagli orientamenti UE sugli aiuti di stato per il salvataggio e la ristrutturazione delle imprese in difficoltà» |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Rescue of firms in difficulty
  Regional development |
| Form of aid | Guarantee |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 13 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration | 6 months |
| Economic sectors | Textiles |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico |
| Via Molise n. 2 |
| I-00187 Roma |

Date of adoption of the decision

22.5.2007

Reference number of the aid

NN 5/07

Member State

Italy

Region

Nuoro

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aiuto al salvataggio del Gruppo Legler

Legal basis

Decreto legge n. 35 del 17 marzo 2005, modificato dalla legge del 14 maggio 2005«Fondo per il finanziamento degli interventi consentiti dagli orientamenti UE sugli aiuti di stato per il salvataggio e la ristrutturazione delle imprese in difficoltà»

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Rescue of firms in difficulty

Regional development

Form of aid

Guarantee

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 13 million

Intensity

—

Duration

6 months

Economic sectors

Textiles

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico

Via Molise n. 2

I-00187 Roma

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
Agreement regarding
                 Dr. Harris's Original Diabetic Feet Formula


Parties:  Desert Health Products, Inc., 8221 E. Evans Rd., Scottsdale AZ
          85260
          ParTrusT Beheer B.V., Max Euwelaan 33, NL-3062 MA Rotterdam, The
          Netherlands


ParTrusT acknowledges that DHPI has entered into an exclusive agreement with
Dr. Harris for the rights to market Diabetic Feet internationally and as such
with its signatures accept the following:

  1.ParTrusT purchases for US$ 250,000.00 a 10% ownership in this agreement.

  2.ParTrusT agrees to transfer to DHPI

       a.   50,000.00 the week of February 15th, 2001
       b.   40,000.00 the week of February 22nd, 2001
       c.   100,000.00 the week of April 10th , 2001
       d.   The balance May10th,2001

  3. DHPI agrees to pay ParTrusT US$2.00 of each unit sold until US$ 250,000
     has been received and US$ 1.25 on each unit thereafter for a period of 10
     years.


Desert Health Products, Inc., agrees as a bonus to deliver to ParTrusT 25,000
(Twenty-five thousand) shares of Desert Health's 144 common stock on
completion of funding.



DESERT HEALTH PRODUCTS, INC.            PARTRUST BEHEER B.V.



/S/Johnny Shannon        2/8/01         /S/Eddie Peijer          2/8/01
--------------------------------         -------------------------------
Chairman/CEO             Date           Managing Partner         Date
EXHIBIT 5

CONSENT OF APPOINTED ACTUARY

I consent to the use and incorporation by reference of the
following report in this Annual Form 40-F of Sun Life Financial Inc.:

My report dated February 10, 2016 on the valuation of the policy
liabilities and reinsurance recoverables of Sun Life Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries for its Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and their change in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the year December 31, 2015, in accordance with accepted actuarial practice in Canada, including selection of appropriate assumptions and methods.

Dated February 10, 2016



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/S/ Larry Madge                      
|                                       
|Larry Madge                            
|                                       
|Fellow, Canadian Institute of Actuaries
|Toronto, Canada
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACKIE DON WHITE, ET AL., No. CIV S-04-2698 MCE DAD P

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER

RICHARD DANGLER, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff Jackie Don White, a state prisoner proceeding pro

se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 for himself, his wife, and his brother. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

The action has been deemed to be a civil action brought

solely by Jackie Don White. 

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-02698-MCE -DAD Document 5 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On July 13, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff Jackie Don

White and which contained notice to him that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty

days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 13, 2005,

are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s federal claims are dismissed on the grounds

that they are legally frivolous and fail to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted;

3. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction

over plaintiff’s state claims; and

4. This action is dismissed.

DATED: August 18, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02698-MCE -DAD Document 5 Filed 08/18/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 64922.

#### Trizonia Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 59/33912 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of narrow woven fabrics of cotton similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Beer Stern Import Corp.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 294, C.D. 1944), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED LAKOTA
TECHNOLOGIES, INC AND FROM SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          65,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,268)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,938
<PP&E>                                          84,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,263)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,711,493
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,662,968
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,991
<SALES>                                        257,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               257,316
<CGS>                                          159,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,259,189
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             437,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,588,149)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,588,149)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,588,149)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)


</TABLE>
No. 53568.

protest 147113-K (New York).

#### Fuchs Shoe Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6325

ALEXANDER CAMERON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. JOHN F. WALRATH, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T. S. Ellis, III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv
- 00051

- TSE

- JFA )

Submitted : July 23, 2020 Decided: July 28, 2020

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Alexander Cameron, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Alexander Cameron seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition as an unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (201 8 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (201 8 ).
When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the disposi tive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently revie wed the record and conclude that Cameron has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Cameron’s motions to identify the blood type o f the victim and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
No. 52059.

#### Charles Products Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60234-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.