alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 471 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow for greater State 

flexibility with respect to excluding providers who are involved in abortions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2023 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. RISCH, Mr. 

BRAUN, Mr. DAINES, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. MARSHALL, and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow 

for greater State flexibility with respect to excluding 

providers who are involved in abortions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Public 

5 Health and Safety Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 471 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASING STATE FLEXIBILITY IN DETERMINING 

2 PARTICIPATION OF PROVIDERS WHO PER3 FORM, OR PARTICIPATE IN THE PERFORM4 ANCE OF, ABORTIONS. 

5 Section 1902 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1396a), as amended by section 5131 of the Health Ex7 tenders, Improving Access to Medicare, Medicaid, and 

8 CHIP, and Strengthening Public Health Act of 2022, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)(23), by striking ‘‘sub11 section (g)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (g) and 

12 (uu),’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub14 section: 

15 ‘‘(uu) RULES WITH RESPECT TO DETERMINATION

16 OF PARTICIPATION OF PROVIDERS WHO PERFORM, OR

17 PARTICIPATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF, ABORTIONS.— 

18 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

19 for purposes of this title, a State, at its option, may 

20 establish criteria with respect to the participation 

21 under the State plan (or a waiver of such plan) of 

22 an institution, an agency, an entity, or a person who 

23 performs, or participates in the performance of, 

24 abortions. 

25 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not 

26 apply to an abortion— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 471 IS

1 ‘‘(A) if the pregnancy is the result of an 

2 act of rape or incest; or 

3 ‘‘(B) in the case where a woman suffers 

4 from a physical disorder, physical injury, or 

5 physical illness that would, as certified by a 

6 physician, place the woman in danger of death 

7 unless an abortion is performed, including a 

8 life-endangering physical condition caused by or 

9 arising from the pregnancy itself. 

10 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub11 section, the terms ‘institution’, ‘agency’, or ‘entity’ 

12 mean the entire legal institution, agency, or entity, 

13 or any part thereof, including any institution, agen14 cy, or entity that controls, is controlled by, or is 

15 under common control with such institution, agency, 

16 or entity.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael Strauss, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


April 29, 2005
                                    /s/ Michael Strauss
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Michael Strauss
                                  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
                                  and President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. Law 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education (9487).                     

*Dates:*                         April 11, 2007, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.                     

*Place:*                         Stafford I, Room 1235, National Science Foundation, 4201Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Alan Tessier, National Science Foundation, Suite 635, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, Virginia 22230, Phone 703-292-7198.                     

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice, recommendations, and oversight concerning support for environmental research and education.                     

*Agenda:*

Introduction of New Members. 

Update on recent NSF environmental activities. 

Reports from AC members on ERE activities in NSF Directorates. 

Discussion of Future AC/ERE activities. 

Establishment of AC/ERE Task Groups. 

Meeting with the Director (or Representative). 

Dated: March 13, 2007. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-4879 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Karp, certify that:

1.          
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CounterPath Corporation

2.          
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.          
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.          
The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a)          
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)          
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.          
The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a)          
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)          
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 14, 2008.



/s/ David
Karp
David Karp Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer)

---
No. 61397.

protest 299239-K (New York).

#### Seiden’s *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I,Morris B. Smith, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cano Petroleum, Inc.;

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)           disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| November 14, 2006              |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| /s/ Morris B.  Smith           |   |
| Morris B. Smith                |
| Chief Financial  Officer       |
| (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

----
AMENDMENT NO


, AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

PROMISSORY NOTE DATED OCTOBER 1, 2014




THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (“Amendment”) to 6% Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note dated October 1, 2014 (“Note”) is made effective the 10th day of March, 2015 by and between MAGELLAN GOLD CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (“Magellan”) and CLIFFORD L. NEUMAN (“Neuman”).  




WITNESSETH:




WHEREAS, Magellan and Neuman desire to amend and modify the Note as provided for hereinbelow. 




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained the parties agree as follows:  




1.

The following sections are amended, in their entirety, to read as follows:




“THIS NOTE is a duly authorized issued Note of  MAGELLAN GOLD CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, (the “Company” or “Maker”), designated as its 6% Convertible Notes (the “Notes”) due on five (5) days’ written demand by Holder (the “Maturity Date”), in an aggregate principal amount of $51,531.88 plus accrued and unpaid interest.”  




“FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Company promises to pay to CLIFFORD L. NEUMAN, the registered holder hereof (the "Holder"), the principal sum of Fifty One Thousand Five Hundred Thirty-One and 88/100  Dollars (US $51,531.88)  and to pay interest on the principal sum outstanding from time to time in arrears at the rate of 6% per annum, accruing from October 1, 2014, the date of initial issuance of this Note (the “Issue Date”).  Accrual of interest shall commence on the first such business day to occur after the Issue Date and shall continue to accrue, compounding quarterly, until payment in full of the principal sum and accrued and unpaid interest have been made or duly provided for.”




2.

Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Note.  References to paragraph designations shall refer to designated provisions of the Note as they currently exist. 




3.

The parties hereby confirm that the Note, as amended is in full force and effect.  In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of the Note, the provisions of this Amendment shall control.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment the date and year first above written.




MAGELLAN GOLD CORPORATION










By:

/s/ John C. Power

/s/  Clifford L. Neuman

  

Name:

John C. Power

Clifford L. Neuman
EXHIBIT 6

CERTIFICATION

pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Sun Life Financial Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31,
2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his respective knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 11, 2016



/s/ Dean A. ConnorDean A. ConnorPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: February 11, 2016



/S/ Colm J. FreyneColm J. FreyneExecutive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer


This certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed to have been, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Before the Second Division,

March 6, 1951

No. 55298.

#### Acme Litho Plate Graining, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 150568-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of East Coast Diversified Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2008 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Frank Rovito, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Frank Rovito

Frank RovitoChief Financial OfficerDated: September 19, 2008

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to East Coast Diversified Corporationand will be retained by East Coast Diversified Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007041EN.01000101.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 41/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | — |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 779/06 |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Northern Ireland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Northern Ireland R&D Challenge Fund |
| Legal basis | Industrial Development (Northern Ireland) Order 1982 |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Research and development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Annual budget: GBP 0,9 million; Overall budget: GBP 0,9 million |
| Intensity | 60 % |
| Duration | 1.1.2007-31.12.2007 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Invest Northern Ireland (Invest NI) |
| Bedford Square |
| Bedford Street |
| Belfast BT2 7EH |
| United Kingdom |

Date of adoption of the decision

—

Reference number of the aid

N 779/06

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Northern Ireland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Northern Ireland R&D Challenge Fund

Legal basis

Industrial Development (Northern Ireland) Order 1982

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Research and development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: GBP 0,9 million; Overall budget: GBP 0,9 million

Intensity

60 %

Duration

1.1.2007-31.12.2007

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

Invest Northern Ireland (Invest NI)

Bedford Square

Bedford Street

Belfast BT2 7EH

United Kingdom

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
#### In the Matter of Theodore Scheriff, Appellant, v Oonagh Scheriff, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 560]

—In a custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Kent, J.), entered August 25,1994, *as awarded custody*of the parties’ child to the mother.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

*451The Family Court properly determined that, in light of the totality of the circumstances, the best interests of the parties’ child were served by awarding custody to the mother *(see, Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 171; *Matter of Scalia v Scalia,*217 AD2d 780; *Fanelli v Fanelli,*215 AD2d 718; *Young v Young,*212 AD2d 114).

Determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses are entitled to great weight *(see, Matter of Karen BB.,*216 AD2d 754; *Matter of Scalia v Scalia, supra; Matter of Canazon v Canazon,*215 AD2d 652; *Fanelli v Fanelli, supra).*In this case, the Family Court properly credited the testimony which supported the finding that the mother intended to return from Ireland with the child and that the father always knew they were in Ireland. Moreover, in light of the corroborative evidence embodied in a letter written by the father, which tended to demonstrate that his first ex-wife’s initial testimony was exaggerated, the Family Court properly credited the later testimony of the first ex-wife which recanted her initial testimony regarding the father’s fitness as a custodial parent *(see, Matter of Karen BB., supra).*The Family Court also was correct in crediting the testimony of the father’s second ex-wife regarding his fitness as a custodial parent.

The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when it refused to permit the father to present rebuttal witnesses. The proposed testimony was concededly redundant in part and, in any event, could have been presented in the father’s direct case *(see, Gobbelet v Hit Cycle Corp.,*121 AD2d 682, 683; Fisch, New York Evidence § 326, at 211 [2d ed]). Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Friedmann, JJ., concur.