alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.2




 Exhibit 4.2 
  






 
 NUMBER 
VRAY 
VIEWRAYTM 
SHARES 
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

CUSIP 92672W 10 3 
THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
is the owner of 
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.01 PAR VALUE, OF 
VIEWRAY INCORPORATED 
transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 
Dated: 
SECRETARY 
PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY 
(Brooklyn, New York) 
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
BY 
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 
AMERICAN FINANCIAL PRINTING INCORPORATED – MINNEAPOLIS 








 



 
 The Corporation shall furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests the powers, designations, preferences and relative,
participating, optional, or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such requests shall be made to the Corporation’s Secretary at the
principal office of the Corporation. 
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they
were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
UTMA – 
Custodian 
TEN COM – as tenants in common 
(Cust) 
(Minor) 
TEN ENT – as tenants by entireties 
under Uniform Transfers to Minors 
JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 
Act

(State) 
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above
list. 
For value received 
hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto 
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
(PLEASE PRINT OR
TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 
Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
Dated

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 
SIGNATURE GUARANTEED 
ALL GUARANTEES MUST
BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE
STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
No. 64886.

#### Norwegian Frozen Fish, *Ltd. v.*United States,

protests 60/109, 60/110, and 60/317 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4151]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency


Open Meeting/Conference Call, Board of Visitors for the National 
Fire Academy

AGENCY: U.S. Fire Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 
DHS.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency announces the following committee 
meeting:
    Name: Board of Visitors (BOV) for the National Fire Academy.
    Date of Meeting: March 28-29, 2007.
    Place: Building H, Room 300, National Emergency Training Center, 
Emmitsburg, Maryland.
    Time: 9 a.m.-5 p.m. on March 28; 8:30 a.m.-12 p.m. on March 29.
    Proposed Agenda: Review National Fire Academy Program Activities.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency announces that the committee meeting will be open to 
the public in the Emmitsburg commuting area with seating available on a 
first-come, first-served basis. Members of the general public who plan 
to participate in the meeting should contact the Office of the 
Superintendent, National Fire Academy, U.S. Fire Administration, 16825 
South Seton Avenue, Emmitsburg, MD 21727, (301) 447-1117, on or before 
March 21, 2007.
    Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and will be available for 
public viewing in the Office of the U.S. Fire Administrator, U.S. Fire 
Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emmitsburg, 
Maryland 21727. Copies of the minutes will be available upon request 
within 60 days after the meeting.
    The National Fire Academy Board of Visitors is administered by the 
U.S. Fire Administration, which is currently part of the Preparedness 
Directorate of the Department of Homeland Security. In the near future, 
the U.S. Fire Administration will be transferred to the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, also part of the Department of Homeland 
Security. During this transition, the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency will continue to support this program.

    Dated: March 1, 2007.
Charlie Dickinson,
Acting U.S. Fire Administrator.
 [FR Doc. E7-4151 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-17-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID MARSHALL GATES,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2632 MCE JFM P 

vs.

WARDEN MARSHALL, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a document in this action on

September 15, 2005. The document is unintelligible. This petition for writ of habeas corpus was

dismissed on September 1, 2005. The document filed by petitioner on September 15, 2005 will

be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings.

DATED: October 21, 2005.

12

gate2632.158

Case 2:04-cv-02632-MCE-JFM Document 11 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Zuosheng Yu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      November 9, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/
      Zuosheng YuZuosheng
      Yu, Chief Executive
Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maximo Cedeno, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 419]

—Mikoll, J. P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.), rendered November 20, 1992, upon a verdict convicting defendant of two counts of the crime of attempted assault in the second degree.

Defendant’s conviction arises out of a May 1991 riot at South-port Correctional Facility in Chemung County where he was an inmate. Defendant was indicted and charged with two counts of assault in the second degree and one count of promoting prison contraband in the first degree for stabbing a correction officer in the abdomen with a sharpened metal rod. The contraband charge was dismissed before trial. Thereafter, at the close of all the proof, County Court decided to submit to the jury two lesser counts of attempted assault in the second degree. Defendant was convicted of both counts and sentenced to two concurrent prison terms of 2 to 4 years, which were to be served consecutively to the sentence defendant was already serving. This appeal ensued.

Initially, we reject defendant’s assertion that County Court should have dismissed the indictment against him rather than submitting the lesser included offenses of attempted assault in the second degree to the jury after the court determined that the proof of physical injury of the correction officer was insufficient to support the assault in the second degree charges. The law is clear that "a trial order of dismissal shall not be granted if the trial evidence is legally sufficient to establish a lesser included offense” *(People v Bouyea,*142 AD2d 757, 758). Here, our review of the evidence, especially the testimony of the victim and an eyewitness, indicates that the proof was legally sufficient to support the convictions and that the jury’s verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Abrams,*203 AD2d 723, 724, *Iv denied*83 NY2d 963).

Defendant’s remaining claims have been examined and *731found to be without merit. Although defendant criticizes the trial strategy of his attorney, we find, upon review of the totality of the circumstances, that defendant was not denied the effective representation of legal counsel (see, *People v Venditto,*171 AD2d 952, 953, *Iv denied*78 NY2d 1130). Finally, we find no error in County Court’s determination that defendant’s sentences on the attempted assault convictions should run consecutively to the sentence defendant was already serving (see, Penal Law § 70.25 [5]).

Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. TS07-1-000]


Rendezvous Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Request for 
Partial Exemption From the Standards of Conduct

March 8, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 21, 2007, Rendezvous Pipeline Company, 
L.L.C. pursuant to section 358.1 of the Commission's regulations, filed 
a request for a partial exemption from the Standards of Conduct issued 
by the Commission in Order No. 690 for the natural gas pipelines.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC. 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4f2f1e6f7fbdad8dddad1e7c1c4c4dbc6c0f4d2d1c6d79ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="377172657478595b5e595264424747584543775152455419505841">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 23, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4626 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Emission Control and Measurement

Technology for Industrial Sources

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 24, 2010

10:00 AM Overview and Introductions All Participants

10:15 AM

Acid Gas Scrubber for Multi-pollutant Reduction

Nicholas Confuorto, 

Belco

10:45 AM Multi-pollutant Emission Reduction Technology for Small Utility 

Boilers

Jamie Fessenden, 

NalcoMobotec

11:15 AM Advanced Gas Liquid Contactor Technology for Multi-Pollutant 

Control Systems

Suzanne Kladder, 

Neumann Systems

11:45 AM Dry Sorbent Injection for Sodium Sorbents Mike Atwell, Solvay

12:15 PM LUNCH

1:15 PM Activated Carbon Injection for Mercury Control on Industrial CoalFired Boilers Rich Miller, ADA-ES

1:45 PM

Costs of Emission Control Technologies

Jim Staudt, Andover 

Technology Partners

2:15 PM

WESP Control of Fine PM including Condensables

James Reynolds, 

Siemens Environmental 

& Energy Systems

2:45 PM

Next-Generation Dry Gas Filtration For the Steel Industry

Don Council, Midwesco 

Filter

3:15 PM BREAK

3:30 PM NOx Reduction in a Capital Constrained World John Boyle, Fuel Tech

4:00 PM State Roundtable: Perspective on Technology Issues in Permitting an 

Industrial Source All Participants

5:00 PM ICAC Overview of the Status of GHG Control Technologies ICAC

5:30 PM WRAP-UP
THURSDAY, MARCH 25, 2010

8:00 AM Opening and Introductions All Participants

8:10 AM

Synthetic Fuel Substitutes for Thermal Oxidizers

Jim Stone, Durr Energy 

& Environ. Systems

8:40 AM

Efficiency Options for Thermal & Catalytic Oxidizers

Kyle Momenee, Anguil 

Environmental Systems

9:10 AM Oxidation Technologies for Stationary Rich and Lean Burn Engines Bill Hizny, BASF

9:40 AM

Diesel Particulate Control Technology

Rich Rosowski, Johnson 

Matthey

10:10 AM BREAK

10:25 AM Particulate Controls for Industrial Applications

Paul Farber, Sargent & 

Lundy

10:55 AM

Controlling Particulate Emissons from Coke Oven Plants

Dennis Lippman, Udhe 

Corporation

11:25 AM Energy Efficiency Improvements: Supply Side Optimization Translates 

into Reductions in CO2e

Vince Albanese, Fuel 

Tech

Emissions Measurement Technologies 

11:55 AM

Predictive Emissions Monitoring System (PEMS)

Richard Hovan, 

Rockwell Automation

12:25 PM LUNCH

1:25 PM Implementation of NH3 Measurement on Post-Combustion NOx 

Reduction Systems Ken Greaves, Cemtek

1:55 PM Advances in NOx Testing with Portable Analyzers (e.g. stationary 

engines & other industrial applications) Craig McKim, Testo

2:25 PM Continuous Mercury Emissions Monitoring Feasibility and Costs Karl Wilber, Tekran

2:55 PM BREAK

3:10 PM

GHG Measurement Technologies

Michael Corvese, 

Thermo Fisher Scientific

3:40 PM Importance of Protocol Gas Accuracy for Emissions Measurement Bob Davis, Airgas
No. 49202.

#### Protests 751684-G, etc., of Armstrong-Beaumont Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00519-CV

IN RE STATE FARM FIRE & CAS. CO.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2015

DISMISSED 

Relator State Farm Fire & Casualty Company filed a petition for a writ of mandamus,

complaining of a June 12, 2014, order denying its plea to the jurisdiction. Relator sought a writ of 

mandamus directing the trial judge to dismiss the real party in interest’s suit against it for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction. The trial court’s order was signed by the Honorable Barbara 

Nellermoe, who was then the judge of the 45th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas. 

On January 27, 2015, we ordered that the Honorable Stephani Walsh be substituted as the 

respondent in this proceeding, and we abated the proceedings to allow Judge Walsh to reconsider 

the decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2. 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CI-02326, styled Ronald Mensch v. State Farm Fire & Casualty 

Company and Texas Department of Insurance - Division of Workers’ Compensation, pending in the 73rd Judicial 

District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Stephani Walsh presiding. The Honorable Barbara Hanson 

Nellermoe signed the order that gave rise to this proceeding. 

 
04-14-00519-CV

On March 5, 2015, Judge Walsh signed an order granting relator’s plea and dismissing the 

real party in interest’s claims for want of jurisdiction. Relator has filed a motion to dismiss this 

original proceeding. We grant the motion and dismiss the petition. 

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
## Cathe Kalisz, API February 2 5 , 2016 Background Ozone across the U.S. (5 pages)

# EPA Analysis of Background Ozone

• Focused on seven months from April to October 2007 when background ozone levels are highest

• Determined seasonal mean background ozone concentrations rather than using 4 th 

# highest maximum daily 8 hour average, which is form of the standard. 

# Example: CASTNET Pinedale Monitor

- 2014
Seasonal Mean MDA8

– 32.9 ppb
4 th 

## Highest MDA8

– 57 ppb Difference of 24.1 ppb

1

### • Langford et al. (2014) conducted a study in Clark County, Nevada that found that:

• Stratosphere

- troposphere transport directly contributed in excess of 30 ppb ozone to the three ozone NAAQS exceedances observed over six weeks of study.

• International transport from Asia contributed > 10 ppb on two of those occasions.



### • If the ozone NAAQS was 70 ppb , there would have been 14 exceedances in the 43 day study

(Langford et al. 2014) 

# Las Vegas Ozone Study

2• Increasing emissions from Asia are outpacing reductions in the U.S.

• Asia NOx emissions increased 44% (55% in China) during 2001

- 2006 while ozone precursors from the U.S. decreased by more than a third in 1985

- 2008.

• Lin et al. (2012) found that enhancements from international transport of Asian emissions were associated with 53% of NAAQS exceedances at a standard of 75 ppb in the south western US

.

• This figure shows the 15

- day transport history of air masses with high ozone values (67

- 99 percentile) (Cooper, 2010). It shows that air descending on the western US spent a significant period of time in the western Pacific and East Asia, where ozone and ozone precursors were picked up and lofted to the United States. 

# Asian Influence on US Ozone

3

# Aura Satellite Measurement of

Increase In Asian Emissions

Verstraeten et al. (2015) review of Aura satellite measurements using the Tropospheric Emissions Spectrometer (TES) for ozone and 

### the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) for NO 2 

### found:

• Ozone concentrations over China have increased 7% between 2005 and 2010 because

– Chinese emissions have increased 21%

– Increased Stratosphere

- troposphere transport

• Transport from China of ozone and its precursors has offset 43% of the 0.42 DU reduction in free tropospheric ozone over the western US that was expected between 2005

- 2010 due to regulations.

( Verstraeten et al., 2015)
45 MDA8

– Maximum daily average 8

- hour ozone concentration

OBS

- Observed MDA8 ozone

BC

- Modeled Boundary Conditions (BC) around the 36 km CONUS domain. BC is comprised of international transport and stratospheric intrusion.

NAT

- Natural Emissions that include biogenic, lightning NOx, sea salt and windblown dust

FIR

- Open land fires including Wildfires, Prescribed Burns and Agricultural Burning

. MCO

- Mexico, Canada and Offshore shipping anthropogenic emissions

US ANT

- U.S. Anthropogenic emissions. 

# Ozone Exceedances Can Result due to Contributions from Multiple Background Sources

(Western Air Quality Study

- 2011 Source Apportionment Modeling)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CENTRAL VISION, LLC, d/b/a/

CLARION HOTEL; FREDERICK T. USHER,

individually, 

 Defendants.

CIV. S-04-2545 DFL PAN PS

ORDER

—o0oOn April 4, 2005, this court approved the parties’

stipulation to set aside defendants’ default and vacate

plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment. Defendants were

directed to serve and file their answer to the complaint by April

15, 2005. Plaintiffs were directed to file a joint status report

by June 10, 2005.

Defendants have yet to file an answer. Plaintiffs timely

filed a joint status report, signed by defendants, which states

Case 2:04-cv-02545-DFL-PAN Document 22 Filed 11/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

the parties have discussed settlement but, in the absence of

defendants’ active participation, plaintiffs anticipate again

requesting default and moving for default judgment. 

If the parties have reached settlement they may, within

ten days of service of this order, file a stipulation requesting

voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(a)(1). 

Alternatively, defendants may serve and file, within

twenty days of service of this order, a proposed answer and

motion for enlargement of time within which to file it, which the

court will evaluate for excusable neglect pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 6(b)(2). 

Should the parties decline to voluntarily dismiss this

action and defendants fail timely to seek enlargement of time

within which to file their answer, plaintiffs shall request the

Clerk of Court to enter default and file a motion for default

judgment.

So ordered. 

Dated: November 9, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02545-DFL-PAN Document 22 Filed 11/09/05 Page 2 of 2