alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cheviot  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company"),  on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date of this  Certification  (the
"Report"),  I, Thomas J. Linneman,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Cheviot  Financial  Corporation  and will be  retained  by Cheviot
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


                                          /s/Thomas J. Linneman
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Thomas J. Linneman
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

         Date:  November 12, 2009
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4873 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit allowance of the 

advanced manufacturing production credit for components produced by 

foreign entities of concern. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2024 

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, and Mr. 

OSSOFF) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

allowance of the advanced manufacturing production 

credit for components produced by foreign entities of 

concern. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Tax Dollars 

5 for American Solar Manufacturing Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4873 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ALLOWANCE OF ADVANCED MAN2 UFACTURING PRODUCTION CREDIT FOR 

3 COMPONENTS PRODUCED BY FOREIGN ENTI4 TIES OF CONCERN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 45X(d) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(5) PROHIBITION ON ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT

9 FOR COMPONENTS PRODUCED BY FOREIGN ENTITIES

10 OF CONCERN.—No credit shall be allowed under sub11 section (a) with respect to any eligible component 

12 which is produced by a foreign entity of concern (as 

13 defined in section 9901(8) of the William M. (Mac) 

14 Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for 

15 Fiscal Year 2021 (15 U.S.C. 4651(8))).’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 this section shall apply to components produced and sold 

18 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-74026, No. 333-52180, No. 333-42892, No.
333-37196 and No. 333-102944) of OpenTV Corp. of our report dated January 23,
2002 except as to Note 16, which appeared in the 2002 OpenTV Corp. Form 10-K,
which is as of April 8, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

                                            /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


San Jose, California
March 12, 2004
Exhibit








Exhibit #10.2


AMENDMENT
TO
CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
2003 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
		
	A.
	The Camden National Corporation 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows:


1.Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting such section in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:
“The maximum number of shares of Stock reserved and available for issuance under the Plan shall be 1,200,000 shares, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(b); provided that not more than 300,000 shares shall be issued in the form of Unrestricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Awards, or Performance Share Awards except to the extent such Awards are granted in lieu of cash compensation or fees. For purposes of this limitation, the shares of Stock underlying any Awards which are forfeited, canceled, reacquired by the Company, satisfied without the issuance of Stock or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) shall be added back to the shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan. Subject to such overall limitation, shares of Stock may be issued up to such maximum number pursuant to any type or types of Award; provided, however, that Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights with respect to no more than 45,000 shares of Stock may be granted to any one individual grantee during any one calendar year period. The shares available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares of Stock or shares of Stock reacquired by the Company and held in its treasury.”
		
	B.
	Except as otherwise so amended, the Plan is confirmed in all other respects.


C.The effective date of this Amendment is as of September 30, 2016.
Executed this 30th day of September, 2016 by a duly authorized officer of Camden National Corporation.


CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
By:	
	
	/s/ John W. Holmes

	John W. Holmes

	Director
Before the Second Division,

May 13, 1953

No. 57325.

protest 167105-K (San Francisco).

#### Einar J. N. Berg and P. W. Bellingall *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cheese knives with handles of hard rubber, solid bone, celluloid, or any pyroxylin, casing, or similar material, the same as those the subject of Abstract 55917, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6574

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

LARRY DONNELL FRYE, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:07-cr-00247-HEH-1; 3:10-cv-00678-HEH) 

Submitted: June 26, 2014 Decided: June 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Larry Donnell Frye, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Larry Donnell Frye seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter 

or amend the court’s prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Frye has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Vizario, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I
      Kelly Yang, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer and
      Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002,,that, to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





*This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
      by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933
      or
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
      Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
      in
      such filing.*




/s/
                Kelly YangKelly
                Yang,
              Chief
                Executive Officer,
              Interim
                Chief Financial Officer and
              Principal
                Accounting Officer,
              March
                7, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-KSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James Dyas, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ James Dyas
James Dyas
Director and
Principle Financial Officer


March 31, 2005
InstantEye MK-2 GEN 3 sUAS

Communication Systems Description

The InstantEye Mk-2 system contains three transmitters, one on the GCS and two on the aircraft. The GCS transmits 

command and control (C2) to the aircraft and the aircraft transmits both flight data and video to the GCS. 

At power up, a frequency scan determines open channels in both the video and data bands, and these channels are used 

for the duration of the flight. This scan allows up to four GCS/aircraft pairs to operate in close proximity. While operating

more than four systems in one area will not cause C2 issues, a 2 km standoff is needed to successfully receive video 

without degradation. 

Vehicle Data

Transmitter Type: Digital

Modulation and Coding: OQPSK DSSS

Min Transmit Frequency: 2.4 GHz

Max Transmit Frequency: 2.48 GHz

Operational Transmit Frequency: Channelized with 5 MHz spacing

Peak Power to Antenna: 63 mW

Average Power to Antenna: 63 mW

Vehicle Video

Transmitter Type: Analog

Modulation and Coding: FM, NTSC RS-170 video

Min Transmit Frequency: 5.7 GHz

Max Transmit Frequency: 5.9 GHz

Operational Transmit Frequency: Channelized with 8 MHz spacing

Peak Power to Antenna: 200 mW

Average Power to Antenna: 200 mW

GCS C2

Transmitter Type: Digital

Modulation and Coding: OQPSK DSSS

Min Transmit Frequency: 2.4 GHz

Max Transmit Frequency: 2.48 GHz

Operational Transmit Frequency: Channelized with 5 MHz spacing

Peak Power to Antenna: 63 mW

Average Power to Antenna: 63 mW
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4834 

To prohibit certain telework employees from receiving certain annual 

adjustments to pay schedules, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2024 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit certain telework employees from receiving certain 

annual adjustments to pay schedules, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Re5 turn to Work Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) COVERED EMPLOYEE.—The term ‘‘covered 

9 employee’’— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4834 IS

1 (A) means an employee who teleworks not 

2 fewer than 1 day, or in the case of an alter3 native work schedule, not less than 20 percent, 

4 a week; and 

5 (B) does not include an employee who— 

6 (i) teleworks not fewer than 1 day a 

7 week; and 

8 (ii) is— 

9 (I) is disabled and receives rea10 sonable accommodations; 

11 (II) a member of the Foreign 

12 Service of the United States; 

13 (III) a Federal law enforcement 

14 officer; 

15 (IV) a member of the Armed 

16 Forces on active duty; or 

17 (V) any other employee, the offi18 cial worksite of whom is not described 

19 in section 531.605(a)(1) of title 5, 

20 Code of Federal Regulations (or any 

21 corresponding similar regulation or 

22 ruling). 

23 (2) EMPLOYEE.—The term ‘‘employee’’ has the 

24 meaning given the term in section 2105 of title 5, 

25 United States Code. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4834 IS

1 (3) TELEWORK.—The term ‘‘telework’’ has the 

2 meaning given the term in section 6501 of title 5, 

3 United States Code. 

4 SEC. 3. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS TO PAY SCHEDULES. 

5 No covered employee may receive an annual adjust6 ment under section 5303 of title 5, United States Code. 

7 SEC. 4. PAY LOCALITIES. 

8 Each covered employee shall be paid at the rate of 

9 basic pay under the applicable grade and step for that em10 ployee under the locality pay area designated as ‘‘Rest of 

11 U.S.’’— 

12 (1) as of the date on which the employee be13 comes a covered employee; and 

14 (2) which shall not be adjusted under section 

15 5304 of title 5, United States Code. 

16 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

17 This Act shall take effect on the first day of the first 

18 full fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of 

19 this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2007304EN.01000101.xml

| 15.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 29 November 2007

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Central Bank of Malta

(ECB/2007/17)

(2007/C 304/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank (hereinafter the ‘ESCB Statute’), and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and of the national central banks of the Eurosystem are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB's Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and of the national central banks of the Eurosystem are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB's Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 1 of Council Decision 2007/504/EC of 10 July 2007 in accordance with Article 122(2) of the Treaty on the adoption by Malta of the single currency on 1 January 2008 (1), Malta now fulfils the necessary conditions for the adoption of the euro and the derogation in favour of Malta referred to in Article 4 of the 2003 Act of Accession is abrogated with effect from 1 January 2008. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 1 of Council Decision 2007/504/EC of 10 July 2007 in accordance with Article 122(2) of the Treaty on the adoption by Malta of the single currency on 1 January 2008 (1), Malta now fulfils the necessary conditions for the adoption of the euro and the derogation in favour of Malta referred to in Article 4 of the 2003 Act of Accession is abrogated with effect from 1 January 2008.

1

| (3) | Pursuant to Article 20 of the amended Central Bank of Malta Act, which enters into force on 1 January 2008, the annual financial statements of the Central Bank of Malta are audited in accordance with Article 27 of the ESCB Statute. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Pursuant to Article 20 of the amended Central Bank of Malta Act, which enters into force on 1 January 2008, the annual financial statements of the Central Bank of Malta are audited in accordance with Article 27 of the ESCB Statute.

| (4) | The Central Bank of Malta has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers and Ernst & Young as its joint independent external auditors for the financial year 2008, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Central Bank of Malta has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers and Ernst & Young as its joint independent external auditors for the financial year 2008,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that PricewaterhouseCoopers and Ernst & Young should be appointed as the joint external auditors of the Central Bank of Malta for the financial year 2008.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 29 November 2007.

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET

---

(1)  OJ L 186, 18.7.2007, p. 32.

1

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00188

- CR

ROLANDO M. ROMERO

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On a ppeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County , Texas Trial Cause No. A

- 11

- 5113

- 2

- CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 24, 2013

.
# C_2007187EN.01001901.xml

| 10.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/19

---

Corrigendum to State aid N 78/06 — Spain

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 160 of 13 July 2007
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 160 of 13 July 2007

(2007/C 187/08)

On page 6 in the second line (Reference number of aid):

for:

‘N 78/06’,

read:

‘N 788/06’.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, S. Jeffrey Johnson, certify that:

 

1.        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cano Petroleum, Inc.;

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.        The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

 

           (a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

           (b)        evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s  disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

           (c)         disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.        The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

 

           (a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

           (b)        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

May 16, 2005

 
| /s/ S. Jeffrey Johnson  |
|-------------------------|
| S. Jeffrey Johnson      |
| Chief Executive Officer |