alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-KSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James Dyas, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ James Dyas
James Dyas
Director and Principle Financial Officer

March 31, 2007
- 498 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports STATE v . GALVAN Cite as 306 Neb. 498

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Braden M. Galvan, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed July 17, 2020. Nos. S‐19‐623, S‐19‐624.

supplemental opinion Appeal from the District Court for Hall County: Mark J. Young , Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehear

ing overruled. Gerard A. Piccolo, Hall County Public Defender, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Melissa R. Vincent for appellee. Heavican , C.J., Miller

- Lerman , Cassel , Stacy , Funke , Papik , and Freudenberg , JJ. Per Curiam

. This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellee, State of Nebraska, concerning our opinion in State v. Galvan , 305 Neb. 513, 941 N.W.2d 183 (2020). We overrule the motion, but modify the opinion as follows: In the analysis section, under the subheading “ Plain Error ,” we withdraw the first two sentences of the fifth paragraph, including footnotes 24 and 25. State v. Galvan , 305 Neb. at 521, 941 N.W.2d at 190. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 07/23/2020 12:08 AM CDT
# C_2007231EN.01000101.xml

| 3.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 231/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16.8.2007 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 177/07 |
| Member State | Slovenia |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Davcna olajšava za raziskave in razvoj |
| Legal basis | Predlog uredbe o regijski davcni olajšavi za raziskave in razvoj |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Research and development |
| Form of aid | Tax base reduction |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 6,7 million; Overall budget: EUR 40 million |
| Intensity | 5 % |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2012 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministrstvo za finance p.p. 644 SLO-1001 Ljubljana |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

16.8.2007

Reference number of the aid

N 177/07

Member State

Slovenia

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Davcna olajšava za raziskave in razvoj

Legal basis

Predlog uredbe o regijski davcni olajšavi za raziskave in razvoj

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Research and development

Form of aid

Tax base reduction

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 6,7 million; Overall budget: EUR 40 million

Intensity

5 %

Duration

Until 31.12.2012

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministrstvo za finance p.p. 644 SLO-1001 Ljubljana

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BYRON L. SCOTT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S 04-2586 LKK GGH P

vs.

CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a request for a court order

allowing him access to the law library. In his motion, plaintiff alleges that court orders are

necessary before he can use the law library and he therefore requests that the court issue an order

granting him “Preferred Legal User” status. 

Plaintiff does not allege that he is under a present obligation to submit documents

within a time certain and thus has not demonstrated that his right of access to the courts is being

impaired. The court will not set a deadline merely for the purpose of insuring the plaintiff

additional library time.

In addition, plaintiff filed his third request for the appointment of counsel. 

Plaintiff’s previous requests were filed on December 6, 2004 and May 25, 2005. All requests

were denied. In light of those orders, plaintiff’s June 17, 2005 request is denied. 

Case 2:04-cv-02586-LKK -GGH Document 29 Filed 07/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s June 17, 2005 request for a court-ordered deadline is denied; and

2. Plaintiff’s June 17, 2005 third request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: 7/13/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

scot2586.31t

 

Case 2:04-cv-02586-LKK -GGH Document 29 Filed 07/14/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 42914.

#### Protest 999246-G of Schranz & Bieber Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was agreed that the nigga chasers in question are similar to those the subject of Abstract 42091. The claim at 12 cents per pound under paragraph 1515 was therefore sustained.
To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Joseph Rykowski" <Joseph.Rykowski@ormet.com>

Date: 12/13/2010 10:27AM

Subject: RE: Ormet Database Files

For the spreadsheets that were in the zip file (other than the ReleasePoint sheet), what updated

information do you need? Some of the information on some of the sheets that I've seen I have no idea

where it came from, or even what year it came from. If you could let me know this as soon as possible, it

would be grea tly appreciated.

Thanks,

Joe Rykowski

Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 8:16 AM

To: Joseph Rykowski

Cc: Robert Strieter

Subject: Re: Ormet Database Files



### It looks like we accidentally left out the units in the release point spreadsheet but

they are the same units that are shown in the Whole Facility HAPs and Category

HAPs spreadsheet. Temperature is degrees F, exit velocity is ft/sec.

Bob, can you forward this to the others. Thanks

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243

- 02

Ph: (919) 541

- 1390 Fax: (919) 541

- 3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov

Fro m: "Joseph Rykowski" <Joseph.Rykowski@ormet.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/08/2010 04:01 PM

Subject: Ormet Database Files

I have a quick question about the database file. What units are the exit gas temperature and exit gas

velocity in?
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4803 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4803

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 31143 State Highway 65 in Pengilly, Minnesota, as the ``First 
              Lieutenant Richard Arne Koski Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2024

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Ms. Smith) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 31143 State Highway 65 in Pengilly, Minnesota, as the ``First 
              Lieutenant Richard Arne Koski Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT RICHARD ARNE KOSKI POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 31143 State Highway 65 in Pengilly, Minnesota, shall be 
known and designated as the ``First Lieutenant Richard Arne Koski Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Lieutenant Richard Arne Koski Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2007151EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/7 |

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(2007/C 151/03)

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid No | XA 7007/07 | | |
| Member State | Federal Republic of Germany | | |
| Region | All German Länder as aid providers | | |
| Title of aid scheme or name of the company receiving an individual aid | Outline Plan of the joint Federal Government/Länder scheme‘Improvement of agricultural structures and coastal protection’ [Rahmenplan der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe ‘Verbesserung der Agrarstruktur und des Küstenschutzes’], which predominantly serves to implement the national framework under Article 15(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, specifically: | | | | --- | --- | | 1. | promoting investment in the sphere of processing and marketing at the level of agricultural holdings (Programme for promoting agricultural investment — AFP) | | | | | --- | --- | | 2. | promoting investment by undertakings active in processing and marketing (Principles for promoting improvement in market structure) | | | | | --- | --- | | 3. | promoting the creation of marketing concepts (Principles for promoting improvement in market structure) | http://www.bmelv.de/cln\_044/nn\_751002/DE/04-Landwirtschaft/Foerderung/GAK/Rahmenplan/Rahmenplan2007.html\_\_nnn=true | | |
| Legal basis | Rahmenplan der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe „Verbesserung der Agrarstruktur und des Küstenschutzes“ | | |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Total amount per year for the Outline Plan of the joint Federal Government/Länder scheme ‘Improvement of agricultural structures and coastal protection’ | EUR 70 million |
| Loans guaranteed | — |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | — |
| Loans guaranteed | — |
| Maximum aid intensity | In accordance with Article 4(2)-(7) and Article 5 of the Regulation | | Yes |
| Date of implementation | 15.2.2007 | | |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | 31.12.2010 | | |
| Objective of aid | Aid to small and medium-sized undertakings | | Yes |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | All economic sectors eligible for aid to SMEs | | |
| Limited to the following economic sectors | | Yes |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | coalmining | | | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | all manufacturing | | | |
| or | | |
| steel industry | | |
| shipbuilding | | |
| synthetic fibres | | |
| motor vehicles | | |
| other manufacturing | | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | processing and marketing of agricultural products | | | Yes |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | all services | | | |
| or | | |
| transport services | | |
| financial services | | |
| other services | | |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The aid is granted by the competent Land authorities. | | |
| Large individual aid grants | In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation | | Yes |

---
### Served: April 2, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------------ 

## CORPORATE FLIGHT MANAGEMENT, INC.

----------------------------------------------------------- -



## NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On March 11, 2014

, Corporate Flight Management, Inc. (“ CFM ”) , a commuter air carrier, 1



### request ed that the Department regist e r t he trade name s “ Buzz Airways ” and “Appalachian Air”

for use in certain of its air transp ortation operations.

Part 215 of the Department’s regulations provides that any carrier wishing to use an alternative

trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further states that the

Department may register such name after t he carrier gives notification to similarly named air

carriers of the proposed use of the name. In this case, there are no there similarly named air

carriers.

Since CFM has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of

the trade name s “ Buzz Airways ” and “Appalachian Air” by CFM for immediate use in its

operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C.

, April 2, 2014

.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document i s available on the World Wide Web at :

http:// www.regulations.gov

1 See Order 2014

- 1

- 14, issued January 2 3, 2014

.

### Attachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR CORPORTATE FLIGHT MANAGEMENT , INC.

ALLEN HOWELL

PRESIDENT

CORPORATE FLIGHT MAN AGEMENT INC

276 DOUG WARPOOLE RO AD

SMYRNA TN 37167 SUSAN B JOLLIE

CO UNSEL FOR CORPORATE FLIGHT

MANAGEMENT INC

7503 WALTON LANE

ANNANDALE VA 22003 PETER LYNCH AGC

- 300

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL F OR

ENFORCEMENT

FEDERAL AVIATION ADM INISTRATION

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

OFFICE OF AIRLINE IN FORMATION

DOT/RITA/BTS RTS

- 42

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590 MARK MAZOR

CERTIFI CFM ION SECTION

MANAGER

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166 BLA NE WORKIE

DOT

ASSISTANT GENERAL CO UNSEL

FOR AVIATION AND PRO CEEDINGS

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

W ASHINGTON DC 20590

MR THOMAS LUIPERSBEC K

PRINCIPAL OPERATIONS INSPECTOR

FEDERAL AVIATION ADM INISTRATIION

NASHVILLE FSDO CE9 MR ED BLOUNT

SUPERVISOR

FEDERAL AVIATION A DMINISTRATION

NASHVILLE FSDO CE9
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Periodic Financial Reports**     I, Paul A. Lang, President of Arch Western Resources, LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the“Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and     (2) information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Arch Western Resources, LLC.                                                       /s/ Paul A. Lang   Paul A. Lang   President   Date: November 13, 2007
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Periodic Financial Reports**     I, Paul A. Lang, President of Arch Western Resources, LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the“Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and     (2) information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Arch Western Resources, LLC.                                                               /s/ Paul A. Lang   Paul A. Lang   President   Date:August 14, 2007
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

29–011 1996

104th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 104–204

AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES

OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, THE SUPREME

COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE THAT HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE COURT, PURSUANT

TO 28 U.S.C. 2075

APRIL 24, 1996.—Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and ordered

to be printed.
(1)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS VALUATION EXPERTS

March 11,
2005

Witness
Systems, Inc.
300 Colonial Center Parkway
Roswell, Georgia 30076

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

We
hereby consent to the use of the name [Taylor Consulting Group, Inc.] and of references to [Taylor Consulting
Group, Inc.] and to the inclusion of and references to our report, or information contained therein, dated March 31, 2003, prepared for Witness Systems, Inc. in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Sincerely,
Taylor Consulting Group, Inc.

/s/
MICHAEL HALLIWELL

Michael
Halliwell
Managing Director

---



QuickLinks
No. 44058.

#### Protests 992242-G, etc., of Dernier, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the authority of Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(C. D. 172)

#### Sam’l. Frankel Silk Corp. *v.*United States

United States Customs Court, Second Division

(Decided June 5, 1939)

*Walden & Webster (Jacob L. Klingaman*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Webster J. Oliver,*Assistant Attorney General *(Joseph E. Weil,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Before Tilson, Kincheloe, and Dallinger, Judges

Kincheloe, Judge;

The merchandise here in question is invoiced as men’s mufflers, and was returned by the appraiser as unhemmed, in chief value of cotton, of a staple under 13⁄8 inches in length, and containing wool. According to the customs laboratory report filed with record the said mufflers are woven and have a wool content of 15.9 *435per centum by weight. Duty appears to have been assessed on the merchandise at the rate of 60 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 906 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as “cloth, in chief value of cotton, containing wool,” by virtue of paragraph 918, which provides that woven mufflers, wholly or in chief value of cotton, not hemmed, shall be subject to duty as cloth. The merchandise is claimed by plaintiff to be dutiable under paragraph 904 of said act as cotton cloth, according to condition and average yarn number, by reason of said paragraph 918.

The plaintiff in its brief relies on the case of *St. Andrews Textile Co.*v. *United States,*reported as Abstract 14146 (58 Treas. Dec. 1167), wherein woven mufflers of cotton and wool, in chief value of cotton, were claimed and held dutiable as cotton cloth under the provisions of paragraph 903 of the Tariff Act of 1922. Under that act there was,however, no provision for “cloth, in chief value of cotton, containing wool, 60 per centum ad valorem,” as contained in said paragraph 906 of the present act of 1930. Now under paragraph 918 of the present act, which is the same in all material respects as paragraph 918 of the act of 1922, the classification of woven mufflers in chief value of cotton lies between the provision for “cotton cloth” under the countable, provisions of paragraph 904, or as “cloth, in chief value of cotton, containing wool,” under said paragraph 906. In our opinion it is only too obvious that the latter provision more specifically covers the-merchandise in controversy. The claim of the plaintiff is therefore overruled. Note *Cosmos Textile Corporation*v. *United States,*21 C. C. P. A. 124, T. D. 46449.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Hubert Edwards v. State.

173 So. 927.

Opinion Filed March 22, 1937.

*Thomas E. Walker,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General,’ and *Roy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the sale in Jackson County, Florida, of alcoholic beverage containing more than 3.2 per cent, of alcohol by weight, while the sale of such alcoholic beverage was prohibited in said county.

We find no reversible error reflected in the record and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

So ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur/
Exhibit
        32
   **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of Sitestar Corporation, (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Frank Erhartic,
        Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Daniel Judd,
        Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  1. 
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. 
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
   /s/ Frank Erhartic,
                Jr.
              
              /s/ Daniel JuddFrank Erhartic, Jr.
              
              Daniel JuddChief Executive Officer and
                President
              
              Chief Financial OfficerMay 16, 2008
              
              May 16, 2008
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 October 1, 2016 
 Michael
Lewis, Ph.D. 
 Bio Diligence Partners, Inc., 
 This letter
shall serve as a twelfth amendment to the Services Agreement dated July 2, 2004. It is hereby agreed to extend the Agreement from October 1, 2016 to July 1, 2017. Compensation described in Exhibit A of the Agreement, as previously amended,
will continue at the rate of $157,500.00 per annum and paid on a monthly basis. The reimbursement for 100% of the health insurance cost shall continue, paid quarterly. 

All other sections of the Agreement continue as written. 
  

			
	Cara Therapeutics, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Derek Chalmers

	Name:	 	Derek Chalmers, Ph.D., D.Sc.
	Title:	 	President & CEO
	
	Bio Diligence Partners, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Lewis

	Name:	 	Michael Lewis, Ph.D.
	Title:	 	President