alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Home Mortgage Investment
Corp. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Strauss, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

May 10, 2004                        /s/ Michael Strauss
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Michael Strauss
                                 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
                                 and President
SHLDEX1042201410K




EXHIBIT 10.42


[LETTERHEAD OF SEARS HOLDINGS]                 
	
		
	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	August 1, 2014    
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Mr. Arun D. Arora
	 






Addendum to Offer Letter dated March 19, 2014
Dear Arun, 


This Addendum to your employment offer letter dated March 19, 2014 (“Offer Letter”) modifies the terms of the Special Incentive Award with respect to SHC’s 2014 fiscal year, subject to approval by the Compensation Committee of SHC’s Board of Directors.


With respect to the Special Incentive Award, the Offer Letter states: 

		
	•
	You will be eligible to receive a Special Incentive Award with respect to each of SHC’s 2014 and 2015 fiscal years, payable by April 15th of the fiscal year following the applicable fiscal year,  provided that you are actively employed at the applicable payment date, subject to the following terms:  



		
	•
	2014 fiscal year: $500,000, 100% of which is subject to reduction by any amount payable to you under the 2014 AIP; and 



		
	•
	2015 fiscal year: $250,000, 100% of which is subject to reduction by any amount payable to you under the 2015 AIP. 



By this Addendum, and pertaining only to the 2014 fiscal year Special Incentive Award, we are amending the Offer Letter so the $500,000  will be payable by January 9, 2015, provided you are actively employed on such payment date.  Further, in the event you do not remain actively employed by SHC through April 15, 2015 you will be required to repay the full $500,000 (including taxes withheld), unless prohibited by law, to SHC within thirty (30) days of your last day worked.  Additionally, any amounts earned by you under SHC’s Annual Incentive Plan for fiscal year 2014 will be reduced by $500,000. 


All other provisions of the Offer Letter remain unchanged.


To acknowledge and accept the terms herein, please sign and date below and return this letter to my attention.


Sincerely, 

/s/ Dean Carter


Dean Carter 

Acknowledged and Accepted:
 
	
			
	/s/ Arun D. Arora
	 
	08/25/2014

	Arun D. Arora
	 
	Date
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350),
the undersigned officer of Syscan Imaging, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                     /s/ William Hawkins
Date:  March 31, 2005
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     William Hawkins, Acting
                                                     Chief Financial Officer,
                                                     Chief Operating Officer and
                                                     Secretary


         This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
PZN 2014 10K EX 10.30






Exhibit 10.30


AMENDMENT, DATED DECEMBER 2, 2014, TO
PZENA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC
AMENDED AND RESTATED BONUS PLAN
(Subject to Stockholder Approval)


This amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Pzena Investment Management, LLC Amended and Restated Bonus Plan (the “Plan”), is made and entered into effective as of December 2, 2014.


RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Pzena Investment Management, Inc., the Managing Member of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”) desires to amend the Plan in accordance with the authority granted by the Plan’s terms.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:
		
	1.
	Section 3.9 of the Plan shall be deleted and replaced with the following:


3.9    Compensation shall mean the total remuneration paid by the Company to an Eligible Individual for services provided to the Company in respect of a Fiscal Year, including, without limitation, base salary, guaranteed minimum base payments, Bonus Awards, commissions, sick pay and short-term disability pay (to the extent paid from payroll), and amounts contributed by or on behalf of the Eligible Individual to any retirement plan or simplified employee plan of the Company.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Eligible Individual’s Compensation shall exclude short-term disability pay not paid from payroll, long-term disability pay, severance pay, welfare and fringe benefits (whether or not includible in the Eligible Individual’s gross income), expense allowances and reimbursements (whether or not includible in the Eligible Individual’s gross income), certain awards or income under the Equity Incentive Plan (other than Restricted Share Units issued under the Equity Incentive Plan pursuant to the terms of this Plan), as determined by the Committee on an annual basis, and, with respect to an Eligible Individual who is a member of the Company, the Eligible Individual’s distributive share, as a member, of the net income of the Company after payment of all compensation and other expenses of the Company.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Eligible Individual's Compensation shall not include any amount paid or payable from an Account to such Eligible Individual during a Fiscal Year.
2.  Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
    
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first above written
PZENA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC
		
	By:
	Pzena Investment Management, Inc., its Managing Member


By: __________________________
Name: Richard S. Pzena
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Order entered December 18, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 01143 - CV KAIZER SHERIFF, Appellant V. SHEHNAZ MOOSA, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. 380 - 54072 - 2011 

### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s December 16, 2013 second unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief filed by January 20, 2014. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

. /s/ ELIZA BETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Before the Second Division,

July 10, 1943

No. 48543.

#### Protests 51833-K, etc., of Absorbo Beer Pad Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of pulpboard the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 48207. In accordance therewith the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1402 was sustained.
#### State of Kansas, *Appellee,*v. Charlie J. Hollingsworth, *Appellant.*

No. 48,350

Opinion filed January 22, 1977.

*Paul L. Thomas,*of Arvin, Arvin, Busey & Thomas, of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant.

*Stephen M. Joseph,*Assistant District Attorney, argued the cause, and *Curt T. Schneider,*Attorney General, *Keith Sanborn,*District Attorney, and *Robért L. Kennedy, Jr.,*Assistant District Attorney, were on the brief for the appellee.

Kaul, J.

Affirmed.
(Reap. Dec. 10452)

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 479850.

(Decided February 18, 1963)

*Lane, Young & Vox*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeal for reappraisement consists of bin'oculars in leather cases exported from Japan subsequent to February 27,1958.

> That binoculars in leather eases are not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; and that the merchandise involved herein was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27,1958.

> *414That onl or about the date of exportation, of the said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature anld all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value, less the item designated on the invoice as “buyers commission” in the amount shown thereon.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the appraised value, less the amount shown on the invoice for the item identified as “Buyer’s Commission.”

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
exhibit_4-6.htm










Exhibit 4.6



 


RR Media Ltd.


 


Amendment No. 4 to 2006 Israel Equity Incentive Plan


Adopted January 28, 2015







The RR Media Ltd. 2006 Israel Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended as follows (the "Amendment"):








	 	
1. 

	
Section 7 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:













“Term of Plan. The Plan will become effective upon its adoption by the Board and will remain in effect until terminated pursuant to Section 20 of the Plan.”










	 	
2. 

	
Section 18(c) of the Plan shall be amended by adding the following new subsection (iii) after the conclusion of subsection (ii):







 


 “For the avoidance of any doubt, in the event any Award Agreement provides that an Award shall be subject to different terms and conditions upon a Change of Control than those set forth in subsections (i) or (ii) above, the terms and conditions set forth in the Award Agreement shall prevail.”








	 	
3. 

	
Except as explicitly amended by this Amendment, all other terms of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
Before the Third Division,

July 3, 1941

No. 46157.

#### Petition 6126-R of William J. Oberle, Inc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the -evidence submitted the court was of the opinion that in making the entries the petitioner was without intention to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 41156 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE ANTONIO GONZALEZ

- SALAZAR , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CR

- 475

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Antonio Gonzalez

- Salazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez

- Salaz ar h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1 6 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-41156 Document: 00513080391 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015No. 14

- 41156

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

mo tion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-41156 Document: 00513080391 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4624 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4624

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a report on the 
 status and timeline for completion of the redesigned Airborne Hazards 
                    and Open Burn Pit Registry 2.0.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2024

   Mr. Welch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a report on the 
 status and timeline for completion of the redesigned Airborne Hazards 
                    and Open Burn Pit Registry 2.0.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit 
Registry (AHOBPR) 2.0 Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON AIRBORNE HAZARDS AND OPEN BURN PIT REGISTRY 2.0.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to Congress a report on 
the current status and timeline for when the redesigned Airborne 
Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry 2.0 will be completed.
                                 <all>
```
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-1117 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DIPLOMATIC PROPERTIES 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CHINA 

Signed at Washington November 17, 2003 

 with 

 

Appendices 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CHINA 

Diplomatic Properties 

 Agreement signed at Washington 

 November 17, 2003; 

 Entered into force November 17, 2003. 

 With appendices. 










Note: At the present time, the Treaty Office does not have the Chinese text of this Agreement. If the Chinese text becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
#### Gladys F. Brown et al., Respondents, v Roger Taylor et al., Appellants.

[633 NYS2d 170]

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered May 10, 1995, granting plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion denied and the verdict reinstated.

In this rather routine two-vehicle accident tried on the issue of liability only, damages having been stipulated to at the sum of $250,000, said sum to be reduced proportionately by any comparative negligence assessed against the plaintiff driver, the jury was presented with a classic case of conflicting accounts, which it resolved in favor of the defendants, a bus *209driver and his employer. While a trial court may, in the exercise of discretion, set aside a verdict, it may not do so merely because it disagrees with the result. Its power in this area must be exercised with caution since, in the absence of an indication that substantial justice has not been done, a litigant is entitled to the benefit of a favorable verdict. Fact-finding is within the province of the jury, not the trial court. "[A] jury verdict in favor of a defendant should not be set aside unless 'the jury could not have reached the verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence’.” *(Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129, 134, quoting *Delgado v Board of Educ.,*65 AD2d 547, *affd*48 NY2d 643; *see, Ellis v Hoelzel,*57 AD2d 968.) In the instant case, there is no basis upon which to set aside the verdict. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Williams and Tom, JJ.
No. 54714.

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 154425-K/2400, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

# AGENCY:

Tennessee Valley Authority. 

# ACTION:

Proposed collection; comment request. 

# SUMMARY:

The proposed information collection described below will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended). The Tennessee Valley Authority is soliciting public comments on this proposed collection as provided by 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1). Requests for information, including copies of the information collection proposed and supporting documentation, should be directed to the Agency Clearance Officer: Alice D. Witt, Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Street (EB 5B), Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801; (423) 751-6832. (SC: 0009BL5) Comments should be sent to the Agency Clearance Officer no later than May 14, 2007. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Type of Request:*                     Regular submission, proposal to extend with revisions to the currently approved collection of information (OMB control number 3316-0019).                 

*Title of Information Collection:*                     energy right®                     Program.                 

*Frequency of Use:*                     Daily.                 

*Type of Affected Public:*                     Individuals or households.                 

*Small Business or Organizations Affected:*                     No.                 

*Federal Budget Functional Category Code:*                     271.                 

*Estimated Number of Annual Responses:*                     29,000.                 

*Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*                     8,700.                 

*Estimated Average Burden Hours Per Response:*.3.                 

This information is used by distributors of TVA power to assist in identifying and financing energy improvements for their electrical energy customers. 

Terry G. Tyler, 

General Manager, Architecture, Planning, & Compliance, Information Services.

 [FR Doc. E7-4498 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8120-08-P