alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.3

               STATEMENT UNDER OATH OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
       REGARDING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS

I, Gaylen M. Brotherson, state and attest that:

     (1)  To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the covered
          reports of M.B.A. Holdings, Inc., and, except as corrected or
          supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

          *    no covered report contained an untrue statement of a material
               fact as of the end of the period covered by such report (or in
               the case of a report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials,
               as of the date on which it was filed); and

          *    no covered report omitted to state a material fact necessary to
               make the statements in the covered report, in light of the
               circumstances under which they were made, not misleading as of
               the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
               report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as of the date
               on which it was filed).

     (2)  I have reviewed the contents of this statement with the Company's
          Audit Committee.

     (3)  In this statement under oath, each of the following, if filed on or
          before the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

          *    Annual Report on Form 10-K of M.B.A. Holdings, Inc. for the year
               ended October 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange
               Commission, File Number 1-9183,

          *    all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all
               definitive proxy materials of M.B.A. Holdings, Inc. filed with
               the Commission subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K
               identified above; and

          *    any amendments to any of the foregoing.

/s/ Gaylen M. Brotherson
-------------------------------
Gaylen M. Brotherson
January 22, 2003
                                       Subscribed and sworn to before me
                                       this 22nd day of January 2003.

                                       /s/ Shelly Beesley
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Notary Public
                                       My Commission Expires: September 30, 2003
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERNARD RHODES,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2250 DFL GGH P

vs.

MIKE KNOWLES, Acting Warden, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has filed his second request for an extension of time to file and serve a

traverse pursuant to the court’s order of December 3, 2004. Good cause appearing, the request

will be granted. No further extensions of time will be granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s May 9, 2005 request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and

serve a traverse. No further extensions of time will be granted.

DATED: 5/13/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

rhod2250.111s

Case 2:04-cv-02250-JAM-GGH Document 11 Filed 05/13/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT  32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

	The undersigned, Robert Hipple, Acting Chief Executive Officer, and
Chief Financial Officer of American Development & Investment Fund, Inc.
(the Company), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that:

1.	The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 14th of April, 2009.

							   /s/ Robert Hipple
							By .........................
							  Robert Hipple,
                                          Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to American Development & Investment Fund, Inc. and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
December 1, 1954

No. 58558.

protest 165026-K.

#### Thornley & Pitt a/c Earl Investment Corpn. *v.*United States,

C. D. 1645. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Kenneth L. Calton, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 672]

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 30, 1994, which, *inter alia,*ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

From October 15, 1990 to November 2, 1990, while he was collecting unemployment insurance benefits, claimant worked as a laborer. He quit this job because his employer criticized his work. Claimant failed to inform the local unemployment insurance office that he had obtained this job or that he left it. In view of these undisputed facts, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant was not totally unemployed from October 15, 1990 to November 2, 1990 and that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Accordingly, the Board’s decision must be affirmed.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4606]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center Web site at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 9, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Patrick M. Wilder, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Paramount Bancorp, Inc., Farmington Hills, Michigan; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Paramount Bank Nevada (in 
organization), Las Vegas, Nevada.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. AMG National Corp., Englewood, Colorado; to become a bank 
holding company by retaining 100 percent of the voting shares of AMG 
National Trust Bank, Englewood, Colorado, upon its conversion from a 
trust company to a commercial bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 8, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-4606 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen A. Hozie, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

April 29, 2005

                            /s/ Stephen A. Hozie
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Stephen A. Hozie
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN RANDOLPH EPPS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2227 DFL KJM P

vs.

KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS,

et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

To: The Director of the California Department of Corrections, 1515 S Street, Sacramento,

California 95814:

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, is obligated to

pay the statutory filing fee of $150.00 for this action. Plaintiff has been assessed an initial partial

filing fee of $2.37 for this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Upon payment of that

initial partial filing fee, plaintiff will be obligated to make monthly payments in the amount of

twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to plaintiff’s trust account. The

California Department of Corrections is required to send to the Clerk of the Court the initial

partial filing fee and thereafter payments from plaintiff’s prison trust account each time the

amount in the account exceeds $10.00, until the statutory filing fee of $150.00 is paid in full. 28

U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

Case 2:04-cv-02227-DFL -KJM Document 9 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Director of the California Department of Corrections or a designee shall

collect from plaintiff’s prison trust account an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $2.37 and

shall forward the amount to the Clerk of the Court. Said payment shall be clearly identified by

the name and number assigned to this action.

2. Thereafter, the Director of the California Department of Corrections or a

designee shall collect from plaintiff's prison trust account the $147.63 balance of the filing fee by

collecting monthly payments from plaintiff's prison trust account in an amount equal to twenty

percent (20%) of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's trust account and

forwarding payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The payments shall be clearly identified by

the name and number assigned to this action. 

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of

plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit on Director, California Department of Corrections,

1515 S Street, Sacramento, California 95814.

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial

Department of the court.

DATED: May 13, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

epps2227.cdc

Case 2:04-cv-02227-DFL -KJM Document 9 Filed 05/16/05 Page 2 of 2
Phantom Stock Agreements









							
	 
	EXHIBIT 10.16


	OMEGA FLEX, INC.

	 

	Phantom Stock Agreements

	 

	Schedule of Directors and Officers

	 

	As of December 31, 2014

	 

	Director/Officer 

	Type 

	Number 

	Grant Date 

	Grant Price 

	Maturity Date 

	Vesting Schedule 


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Dean W. Rivest

	Full

	1,500 

	03/03/2011 

	$13.14

	03/03/2015

	3 years 


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	02/16/2012 

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,500

	04/03/2013

	$15.01

	03/03/2017

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,800

	02/19/2014

	$20.20

	02/19/2018

	3 years


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Paul J. Kane

	Full

	1,500 

	03/03/2011 

	$13.14

	03/03/2015

	3 years 


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	02/16/2012 

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,500

	04/03/2013

	$15.01

	03/03/2017

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,800

	02/19/2014

	$20.20

	02/19/2018

	3 years


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Edwin B. Moran

	Full

	1,500 

	03/03/2011 

	$13.14

	03/03/2015

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	02/16/2012 

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,500

	04/03/2013

	$15.01

	03/03/2017

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,800

	02/19/2014

	$20.20

	02/19/2018

	3 years


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Steven A. Treichel

	Full

	2,100

	03/03/2011 

	$13.14

	03/03/2015

	3 years


	 
	Full

	2,100

	02/16/2012 

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years


	 
	Full

	2,100

	04/03/2013

	$15.01

	03/03/2017

	3 years


	 
	Full

	2,550

	02/19/2014

	$20.20

	02/19/2018

	3 years


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Timothy P. Scanlan

	Full

	1,500 

	03/03/2011 

	$13.14

	03/03/2015

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	02/16/2012 

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,500

	04/03/2013

	$15.01

	03/03/2017

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,800

	02/19/2014

	$20.20

	02/19/2018

	3 years


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Steven Hockenberry

	Full

	590

	02/16/2012

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years


	 
	Full

	590

	04/03/2013

	$15.01

	03/03/2017

	3 years


	 
	Full

	710

	02/19/2014

	$20.20

	02/19/2018

	3 years
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., a Florida Corporation

, Appellant,

v.

ROLLS

- ROYCE CORPORATION, a foreign profit corporation; ROLLS

ROYCE NORTH AMERICA, INC., a foreign profit corporation; ROLLS

ROYCE, PLC; a foreign profit corporation; IAE INTERNATIONAL AERO ENGINES AG, a foreign profit entity; and PRATT & WHITNEY, a division

of UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; a foreign profit corporation

,

Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 3265

[ August 2, 2018 ]

Appe al from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael L. Gates , Judge; L.T. Case No. 16

- 12458 CACE (12)

.

Juan R. Serrano and Eric D. Griffin, Jr. of Griffin & Serrano, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Thomas E. Scot t, Scott A. Cole and Warren H. Chin of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C.J., M AY and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Case 2:04-cv-01086-DFL-PAN Document 13 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 2Case 2:04-cv-01086-DFL-PAN Document 13 Filed 11/01/05 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), I, S. Jeffrey Johnson,Chief Executive Officer of Cano Petroleum, Inc. (the “Company”), certifythat the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:      May 12,  2010 |   | /s/ S. Jeffrey Johnson  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                                                        |   | S. Jeffrey Johnson      |
|                                                        |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmelo Cabrera, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 550]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Joy, J.), rendered May 7, 1992, convicting him of assault in the second degree and menacing, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People, v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s claim that his conviction of assault in the second degree was repugnant to his acquittal of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree is unpreserved for appellate review because he failed to raise this argument prior to the discharge of the jury *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10; *People v Alfaro,*66 NY2d 985, 987; *People v Buford,*198 AD2d 55; *People v Cruz,*175 AD2d 212). In any event, the defendant’s claim of repugnancy is without merit. Viewing the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury *(see, People v Tucker,*55 NY2d 1, 7), the jury could have found the defendant guilty of assault in the second degree while also concluding that he was not guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
No. 47870.

#### Protests 56782-K, etc., of Union Brokerage Co. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which the lumber was imported and that no addition should have been made for planing, tonguing, and/or grooving. Protests sustained to that extent.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/              Freddie M. Kotek    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Freddie              M. Kotek        |
|   | Title: | Chief              Executive Officer |
|   | Date:  | August              15, 2005         |

----
Case 2:04-cv-02525-DFL -KJM Document 7 Filed 05/06/05 Page 1 of 2Case 2:04-cv-02525-DFL -KJM Document 7 Filed 05/06/05 Page 2 of 2
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-1204 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SPACE COOPERATION 

Telescope Mission 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ITALY 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Rome November 16 and December 4, 2007 

with 

Memorandum of Understanding 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ITALY 

Space Cooperation: Telescope Mission 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes 

 at Rome November 16 and 

 December 4, 2007; 

 Entered into force December 4, 2007. 

 With memorandum of understanding.
(Reap. Dec. 9509)

#### Sea Maid, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 496960.

(Decided September 22, 1959)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*492Olivee, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED,, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court, that at tbe date of exportation of tbe merchandise involved herein, metal expansion watch bands, including telescope and sports type, manufactured in and exported from Japan to tbe United States, tbe market value or tbe price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States was the invoice unit prices, net packed.

> IT IS EURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise at the date of exportation thereof as defined in Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.

On the agreed facts, I hold export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question and that such statutory value therefor is the invoice unit prices, net packed.

Judgment will he rendered accordingly.