alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDDIE LEE RADFORD, No. CIV-S-04-1679 MCE/KJM P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

T. FELKER, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On July 27, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-01679-MCE -KJM Document 10 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 27, 2005,

are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local

Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED: September 20, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01679-MCE -KJM Document 10 Filed 09/20/05 Page 2 of 2
Discussion Draft:

Base Case Shipments

Jim McMahon

JEMcMahon@lbl.gov

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

To DOE Workshop, Washington, D.C.

July 23, 1997

.,^~~ . ," -' ^ ' ! ' ^
Possible approaches

· Extrapolate historical trend

- annual shipments by year

Dependence on key drivers

- replacement (lifetime, historical shipments) - new housing construction

Economic models (include elasticity to:)

- appliance prices

- energy prices

- water and sewage prices

Other

Energy Analysis Program
Extrapolate historical trend Zmj

L.

* U.S. shipments of washers

- exclude compacts

-exclude exports

· Linear trend vs time

- 10 years (1987-1996)

- 20 years (1977-1996) - 30 years (1967-1996)

- 40 years (1957-1996)

· Project trend to year 2030

Energy Analysis Program
Dependence on key drivers

* Replacement

- Historical shipments

- Average life 14 years (range: 10-18)

* New housing construction

- Bureau of Census housing starts

* single family

* multifamily

* mobile homes

- Percent of consumers

* Not accounted for:

- additions (by previous non-owners in existing houses) - economic factors (price, energy and water costs)

Energy Analysis Program
Shipments of Clothes Washers

(excluding compacts and exports)

10

9 - History Projected j" _-" 9 U

_ -

7 m- ; . ..

*** * " t i_ ---- regress 20 years

3 - al a ...--.- ' Hi regress storiregress 30 40years years i 3 -

2- , I regress 30 years I ·a

.1 .· -. , , | ' - ' ' |* ' ' | | | | | * | ' X ' i*| W Is | | | | e e regress s X 10 yea rsl l I............. 

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015. 2020 2025 2030

/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~22 2030 '
No. 65536.

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc., a/c Pacific Instruments Corp., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/25610, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, G.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of recording tapes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Electric & Musical Industries (US), Ltd.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 2070), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>

[TRANSLATION FROM HEBREW]

EXHIBIT 4.(a).32

                                 [State Emblem]

      GENERAL LICENSE FOR PARTNER COMMUNICATIONS LTD. FOR THE PROVISION OF
         MOBILE RADIO TELEPHONE (MRT) SERVICES USING THE CELLULAR METHOD

                                AMENDMENT NO. 17

By virtue of my powers under the Communications Law (Telecommunications and
Broadcasts), 5742-1982, the Wireless Telegraph Ordinance [New Version],
5732-1972 and by all my other powers under any law, and after having considered
the arguments of PARTNER COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LTD. (hereinafter: "PARTNER") I
hereby amend the General License for the provision of mobile radio telephone
(MRT) services using the cellular method granted to Partner on 7 April 1998, as
follows:

AMENDMENT OF APPENDIX "J"

     1.   In Appendix J, the following shall replace Article 4.5 (e):

          "(e)    The Licensee shall transfer on a daily basis to all
                  International Operators, a daily modification file of
                  Subscriber Ascription (hereinafter- "Modification File") that
                  includes the details of the Subscribers that ascribed to the
                  International Operator or terminated the ascription that day.
                  The Modification File shall be transferred in the time and
                  manner that will be agreed upon between the Licensee and the
                  International Operator. The file shall include the details of
                  the Subscriber and at least the following: first and last name
                  or corporation name, ID number or corporation number, address
                  and telephone number ascribed to the International Operator."

 EFFECT

     2.   This Amendment shall take effect no later than May 1, 2003.

                                                              (sgd.)
                                                     ___________________________

<PAGE>

         (11 February, 2003)                         Reuven (Ruby) Rivlin
                                                     Minister of Communications
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Potomac Realty Trust (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry H. Bass, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 9, 2005
    
    /s/ Barry H. BassBarry H. BassExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
124 STAT. 3270 PUBLIC LAW 111–300—DEC. 14, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5758: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Nov. 16, 17, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 2, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–300 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2 Government 

Center in Fall River, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Sergeant Robert Barrett Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT ROBERT BARRETT POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2 Government Center in Fall River, Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Robert 

Barrett Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Robert Barrett Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 14, 2010. 

Dec. 14, 2010 

[H.R. 5758] 


ebenthall on DSK9Q6SHH1PROD with PUBLAW
January 27, 1944

No. 49185.

#### Petition 6154-R of A. W. Fenton Co.

, Government’s application for rehearing granted.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WILLIAM W. CROWELL, Jr., Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

20 USCMA 148, 42 CMR 340

No. 23,417

November 13, 1970

*Lieutenant George F. McGunnigle, Jr.,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Michael F. Fasanaro, Jr.,*JAGC, USN, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review is affirmed. United States v Palos, 20 USCMA 104, 42 CMR 296 (1970).

Judge Darden concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Palos, 20 USCMA 104, 42 CMR 296 (1970).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTOPHER M. RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2625 MCE KJM P

vs.

HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER FOR PAYMENT

 / OF INMATE FILING FEE

To: The Director of the California Department of Corrections, 1515 S Street, Sacramento,

California 95814:

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, is obligated to

pay the statutory filing fee in effect at the time of filing of this action, $150.00. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is obligated to make monthly payments in the amount of twenty percent

of the preceding month’s income credited to plaintiff’s trust account. The California Department

of Corrections is required to send to the Clerk of the Court payments from plaintiff’s account

each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00, until the statutory filing fee is paid in full. 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

 In accordance with the above and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

Case 2:04-cv-02625-MCE -KJM Document 23 Filed 05/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The Director of the California Department of Corrections or a designee shall

collect monthly payments from plaintiff’s prison trust account in an amount equal to twenty

percent (20%) of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's trust account and shall

forward those payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) until a total of $150.00 has been collected and

forwarded to the Clerk of the Court. The payments shall be clearly identified by the name and

number assigned to this action. 

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of

plaintiff's in forma pauperis affidavit on Director, California Department of Corrections, 1515 S

Street, Sacramento, California 95814.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial

Department of the court.

DATED: May 19, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

rich2625.cdc.a

Case 2:04-cv-02625-MCE -KJM Document 23 Filed 05/20/05 Page 2 of 2
NO. 13-14-00083-CR

VALENTIN GAONA § IN THE § VS. § COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS § STATE OF TEXAS § TRAVIS COUNTY, TX

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PDR TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: Now comes VALENTIN GAONA Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file PDR, pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and for good cause shows the following: 1. This case is on appeal from the 94TH Judicial District Court of NUECES County,

Texas. 2. The case below was styled the STATE OF TEXAS vs. VALENTIN GOANA, and

numbered 13-CR-2947-C. 3. Appellant was convicted of Evading with a Vehicle and Sentencd to32 years TDC on January 22, 2014. 4. Notice of appeal was given on or about January 30, 2014 5. The clerk's record was filed on May 13, 2014; the reporter's record was filed on March 20, 2014. 6. The appellate brief was filed on or about 7. The appellate brief is presently due on or about October 17, 2014. 8. State’s Brief was filed December 1, 2014. 9. The Court of Appeals issued an opinion on February 19, 2015 10. A Petition for Discretionary Review was due on March 19, 2015 and Deadline for PD-0383-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 4/3/2015 12:20:27 PM Accepted 4/3/2015 1:39:41 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKan extension is April 3, 2015.

11. Defendant is currently incarcerated at the WI LLACY Unit, 1695 S Buffalo Dr. Raymondville, TX 78580. 11. Appellant relies on the following facts as goo d cause for the requested extension:

TO ALLOW DEFENDANT TIME TO FILE ‘PRO SE’ PDR. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED , Appellant prays that this Court grant this Motion To Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief, an d for such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate. Respectfully submitted,

GRAHAM LEGAL SERVICES 3206 Reid Dr 105 Corpus Christi, TX 78404 Tel: (361) 723-1530 Fax: (361) 723-1531 By:/s/CORETTA GRAHAM Coretta T. Graham State Bar No. 50511851 Appeal Counsel for VALENTIN GOANA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on April 3 2015, a true an d correct copy of the above and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Offi ce, Nueces County, 901 Leopard rm, 206, CC, TX 78401, by hand delivery/email.

/s/CORETTA GRHAM Coretta T. Graham, Appeal Counsel
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Reports, Statements & Publications
- Combined Statement
- Receipts by Department

# Receipts by Department

## Fiscal Year 2022

- Final Receipts Excel format 
- Final Receipts PDF format 

## Fiscal Year 2021

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (156 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2020

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (156 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2019

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (160 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2018

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (159 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2017

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (164 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2016

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (162 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2015

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (172 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2014

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (350 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2013

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (332 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2012

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (332 KB)    
- Third Quarter Report   Excel  (318 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2011

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (334 KB)    
- Third Quarter Report   Excel  (303 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2010

- Fourth Quarter Report                Due to technical issues the excel file for the preliminary file will not be available. We are sorry for any inconvenience this may cause you, we hope to resolve the issue before the final files are uploaded. Thank you.   ASCII  (224 KB)    
- Third Quarter Report   Excel  (296 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2009

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (335 KB)    
- Third Quarter Report   Excel  (312 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2008

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (388 KB)    
- Third Quarter Report   Excel  (323 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2007

- Fourth Quarter Report    Excel  (685 KB)    
- Third Quarter Report    Excel  (685 KB)

## Fiscal Year 2006

- Fourth Quarter Report   Excel  (350 KB)    
- Third Quarter Report   Excel  (571 KB)

Last modified 10/21/22
No. 44992.

#### Protests 546702-G, etc., of American Scotti Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is wool hoods similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLIFFORD LEE BAIR, No. CIV-S-04-2257 MCE/GGH P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

FOLSOM STATE PRISON, ET AL., 

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On September 13, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings

and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and

which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-02257-MCE -GGH Document 22 Filed 11/17/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Both parties have filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 13,

2005, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is

denied.

DATED: November 16, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02257-MCE -GGH Document 22 Filed 11/17/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Lpath, Inc. (the “Corporation”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ScottR. Pancoast, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 
| Date:  May 12, 2008 |                                        |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                     | /s/  Scott R. Pancoast                      |
|                     | President  and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                     |                                        |
|                     | /s/  Gary J. G. Atkinson                    |
|                     | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Lpath, Inc. and will be retained by Lpath, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of Lpath, Inc. under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whethermade before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11

KEANE, INC.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993, 1994 AND 1995

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
Primary                             1993            1994              1995
                                ------------------------------------------------
<S>                             <C>             <C>              <C>
Average shares outstanding          
    Common Stock                    11,297           13,617           15,887

    Class B Common Stock               291              290              288

    Net effect of dilutive stock    
    options -- based on the        
    treasury stock method      
    using average market price         310              255              173
                                   -------          -------          -------
         Total                      11,898           14,162           16,348
                                   =======          =======          =======
Net Income                         $ 9,058          $16,235          $19,257
                                   =======          =======          =======
Per Share Amount                   $   .76          $  1.15          $  1.18
                                   =======          =======          =======
<CAPTION>
 
 
Fully Diluted                       1993            1994              1995
                                ------------------------------------------------
<S>                             <C>             <C>              <C> 
Average shares outstanding          
    Common Stock                    11,297           13,617           15,887

    Class B Common Stock               291              290              288

    Net effect of dilutive stock   
    options -- based on the       
    treasury stock method
    using higher of average
    market price of period
    ending price                       328              260              185
                                   -------          -------          -------
         Total                      11,916           14,167           16,360
                                   =======          =======          =======
Net Income                         $ 9,058          $16,235          $19,257
                                   =======          =======          =======
Per Share Amount                   $   .76          $  1.15          $  1.18
                                   =======          =======          =======
</TABLE>

PAGE 42
No. 46753.

#### Protest 62733-K of Mrs. Lathrop Brown (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. From an examination of the papers the protest was overruled.
Case 2:04-cv-01955-MCE -PAN   Document 22    Filed 05/18/05   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-25T12:01:05-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Teresa G. Alegre,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 04-2379 FCD PAN P

vs. Order

Gloria Henry, et al., 

Respondents.

-oOoJuly 28, 2005, petitioner requested an extension of time to

oppose respondent’s motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing,

petitioner’s request is granted and time is extended until 30

days from the date this order is signed. No further extensions

will be granted absent a showing of manifest injustice.

So ordered.

Dated: August 16, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02379-FCD-PAN Document 15 Filed 08/17/05 Page 1 of 1
Opinion filed February 12, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-13-00068-CV

___________

MAIN STREET-SANTA ANA, LLC, Appellant

V.

MOUNT VERNON FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 385th District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV46637

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Main Street-Santa Ana, LLC, has filed in this court an agreed

motion to dismiss its appeal with prejudice. Appellant states that the parties “have 

reached a settlement agreement of all issues on appeal,” and Appellant requests

that we dismiss this appeal with prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

February 12, 2015 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
No. 60828.

#### Columbian Rope Co. *v.*United States,

protests 267452-K and 270788-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of textile machinery and parts thereof used for manufacturing or processing vegetable fibers similar in all material respects to the textile machinery and parts the subject of *The A. W. Fenton Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(34 Cust. Ct. 202, C. D. 1705), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.