alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10763)

#### Kurt Orban Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 53, etc.

(Decided June 3, 1964)

*Sharretts, Paley & darter*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule A, attached to and made a part of the decision herein, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain wire strand, imported from Japan.

By written stipulation of the parties, it has been agreed as follows:

> That the merchandise covered by the appeals to reappraisement enumerated in Schedule “A”, attached hereto and made part hereof, consist of wire strand exported from Japan during the period beginning January 1, 1959 and ending September 30, 1960; that wire strand is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; that on or immediately preceding the date of exportation of each shipment of wire strand covered by each of the appeals to reappraisement enumerated on Schedule “A”, the prices at which wire strand, such as or similar to the wire strand described on the invoices covered by the instant appeals to reappraisement were freely sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal market of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the *579merchandise in condition, packed ready £or shipment to the United States, was $254. per metric ton for wire strand of % inch diameter and $252. per metric ton for wire strand of %6 inch diameter (United States funds!.

Upon the agreed facts of record, the court finds and holds that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (19 U.S.C. § 1401a (b)), is the proper basis of value for the wire strand in issue and that said value is’ $254 per metric ton for wire strand of %-inch diameter and $252 per metric ton for wire strand of %6-inch diameter (United States funds).

Judgment will issue accordingly.
October 16, 2009

Mr. Richard Mattick

Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response's (OSWER's)  

Policy Analysis and Regulatory Management  

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, DC  20460

Dear Mr. Mattick:

On behalf of The U.S. Conference of Mayors, I appreciate this opportunity to respond to your forthcoming

proposal to regulate Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) or Coal Combustion Byproducts (CCB).

The U.S. Conference of Mayors strongly opposes the idea of labeling of CCRs or CCBs as a hazardous waste. We

do, however, encourage the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to label CCRs and CCBs as a non‐hazardous

waste and for this material to be properly disposed of as any other non‐hazardous material.

The Mayors of this nation are on the forefront of protecting public health while maintaining the economic vitality

of their communities. CCBs should be regulated as a non‐hazardous waste to allow these byproducts to be safely

managed in a manner that fully protects public health and the environment without generating the severe

economic impact that would result if EPA labels CCBs as a hazardous material. CCBs are now being safely used in

concrete and other construction materials. However, by labeling CCR as a hazardous waste, EPA would severely

curtail the use of these byproducts in this safe manner. Additionally, the resulting increased costs for the disposal

and transportation would present an undue financial burden on constituents and local businesses.

Thank you for your consideration on this matter. Attached you will also find a copy of the letters we have received

so far on this matter. If you have any questions, please call Judy Sheahan of my staff at 202‐861‐6775 or email her

at jsheahan@usmayors.org.

Sincerely,

Tom Cochran

CEO and Executive Director

The U.S. Conference of Mayors

cc: Andrew Hanson, Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations
# C_2007041EN.01001601.xml

| 24.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/16

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628 of 24 October 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to national regional investment aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 41/11)

| Aid No | XR 29/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Lithuania |
| Region | Kaunas |
| Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement | Nacionalinės regioninės pagalbos teikimo Kauno laisvojoje ekonominėje zonoje schema |
| Legal basis | Lietuvos Respublikos laisvųjų ekonominių zonų įstatymas (Žin., 1995, Nr. 59-1462); Lietuvos Respublikos Kauno laisvosios ekonominės zonos įstatymas (Žin., 1996, Nr. 109-2474); Lietuvos Respublikos ūkio ministro įsakymas (Žin., 2007, Nr. 11-462) |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Annual budget | LTL 17 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | 50 % |
| In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 19.1.2007 |
| Duration | 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for regional investment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Lietuvos Respublikos Ūkio ministerija |
| Gedimino pr. 38/2 |
| LT-01104 Vilnius |
| tel. (370-5) 262 38 63; (370-5) 262 65 84 |
| faks. (370-5) 262 39 74 |
| El. paštas: kanc@ukmin.lt |

Aid No

XR 29/07

Member State

Lithuania

Region

Kaunas

Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement

Nacionalinės regioninės pagalbos teikimo Kauno laisvojoje ekonominėje zonoje schema

Legal basis

Lietuvos Respublikos laisvųjų ekonominių zonų įstatymas (Žin., 1995, Nr. 59-1462); Lietuvos Respublikos Kauno laisvosios ekonominės zonos įstatymas (Žin., 1996, Nr. 109-2474); Lietuvos Respublikos ūkio ministro įsakymas (Žin., 2007, Nr. 11-462)

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Annual budget

LTL 17 million

Maximum aid intensity

50 %

In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

19.1.2007

Duration

31.12.2013

Economic sectors

All sectors eligible for regional investment aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Lietuvos Respublikos Ūkio ministerija

Gedimino pr. 38/2

LT-01104 Vilnius

tel. (370-5) 262 38 63; (370-5) 262 65 84

faks. (370-5) 262 39 74

El. paštas: kanc@ukmin.lt

Internet address of the publication of the aid scheme

http://www.ukmin.lt/lt/investicijos/

Other information

—

---
November 17, 1960

No. 64913.

#### House of Italian Handicrafts, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/32782 (B).

Abstract 64809. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25 1. In the court’s April 19, 2005 order, the court inadvertently refers to petitioner’s second amended

petition for a writ of habeas corpus as petitioner’s amended petition. The operative habeas petition is

petitioner’s second amended petition, filed on December 6, 2004.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRY MONTGOMERY,

Petitioner,

v.

A.A. LAMARQUE, Warden,

Respondent.

CIV S 04-2116 FCD DAD P

[HABEAS CORPUS;

28 U.S.C., § 2254]

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the time for filing a response to the second amended petition

for writ of habeas corpus1/ is extended to and including July 18, 2005.

DATED: May 25, 2005.

DAD:4

mont2116.eot

Case 2:04-cv-02116-FCD-DAD Document 10 Filed 05/26/05 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report
of Wild Craze, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Justin Jarman, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: August 14, 2012 | By: | /s/ Justin Jarman                                     | 
|--------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|                      |     | Justin Jarman                                         | 
|                      |     | Principal Accounting Officer
        Wild Craze, Inc. |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAXIMILIANO MENDEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2447 LKK DAD P

vs.

DR. CRAPOTTA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this action. Plaintiff has filed a

request for court assistance and an extension of time to respond to defendants’ motion to dismiss. 

Plaintiff states that he received a declaration by N. Grannis in support of a motion to dismiss but

did not receive the motion.

The declaration received by plaintiff may be his copy of the duplicate declaration

filed and served by defendants on July 8, 2005, after the court informed counsel that some of the

exhibits to the motion to dismiss filed electronically on July 5, 2005, are too dark to read. In the

interests of justice, the court will direct defendants to re-serve their motion to dismiss.

Plaintiff’s request for court assistance and an extension of time was submitted

without a proof of service. Plaintiff is advised that every document he submits to the court for

consideration must be served on defendants’ counsel. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Every document

Case 2:04-cv-02447-LKK -DAD Document 20 Filed 08/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

submitted for filing must include a proof of service stating the name of the document served, the

date on which a complete copy of the document was placed in the mail to opposing counsel, and

name and complete address of the person to whom the copy was mailed. See Local Rule 5-

135(b) and (c). A proof of service must be dated and signed under penalty of perjury. Plaintiff is

cautioned that each document subsequently filed in this action must include a proper certificate

of service.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s August 15, 2005 request for court assistance and an extension of

time is granted;

2. Defendants shall re-serve their July 5, 2005 motion to dismiss upon plaintiff

within five court days after this order is filed and shall file a certificate of service reflecting the

date of re-service;

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss

within thirty days after re-service of the motion; and

4. Defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed within fifteen days after service of

plaintiff’s opposition.

DATED: August 19, 2005.

DAD:13:bb

mend2447.36

Case 2:04-cv-02447-LKK -DAD Document 20 Filed 08/19/05 Page 2 of 2
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 9:48 AM

To: AS_Waiver_Requests; Berringer, Bryan

Cc: Mike Moss

Subject: RE: [Correction]Samsung Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver - Dual

Compressor Refrigerator

Good morning Mr. Berringer,

Please register both of these models and not as a revised one model replacing the other.

Thank you.

Best,

Jenni

From: Jenni Chun [ mailto:j1.chun@samsung.com ]

Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:34 PM

To: AS_Waiver_Requests@ee.doe.gov ; 'Berringer, Bryan'

Cc: Mike Moss; 'Jenni Chun'

Subject: RE: [Correction]Samsung Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver - Dual

Compressor Refrigerator

Dear DOE Waiver,

A model name change has been detected and I would like to resubmit the applications reflecting this

correction. Please refer to the attachments.

 From RF3 4 H99****  To RF3 3 H99****

We apologize for any inconvenience. Thank you.

Best regards,

Jenni
Before the First Division,

January 11, 1943

No. 47894.

#### Protest 34481-K of H. H. Elder & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

At the trial the importer testified, and one of the so-called kernels which the witness called a “nut” was received in evidence as exhibit 2. However, this witness displayed no qualifications to enable him to testify with authority that exhibit 2 is a nut, nor does it appear that he is a botanist or had any extensive learning or experience on the subject of nuts. No other witnesses were called. On the record presented, which was held insufficient to warrant a finding *370that the oil in question has therapeutic or medicinal properties and is chiefly used for medicinal purposes, and no effort having been- made to prove that the oil in .question -was not edible, all claims in the protest were overruled.
No. 61378.

protests 295633-K, etc. (New York).

#### Charles Garcia & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fishing lines the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60183, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 59584.

protests 209192-K, etc. (New York).

#### Murmac Importing Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4394]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-332-000]


Southwest Gas Storage Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

March 6, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 1, 2007, Southwest Gas Storage Company 
(Southwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 5, to become 
effective April 1, 2007:
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d3b382f3e3213111413182e080d0d120f093d1b180f1e531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d99f9c8b9a96b7b5b0b7bc8aaca9a9b6abad99bfbcabbaf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4394 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          12,201
<SECURITIES>                                    13,552
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,656
<PP&E>                                          29,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,875
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,655
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,881
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,761
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   145
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  96
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,276
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,896
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 11 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarter  ended
September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I, Thomas J. Riha,
Chief  Financial  Officer  of WNC &  Associates,  Inc.,  general  partner of the
Partnership, hereby certify that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice-President - Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 19, 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOK T. LAU,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTONIO V. SILVA et al.,

Defendants.

CIV. S-04-2351 WBS PAN PS

 ORDER

-o0oPlaintiff requests enlargement of time to respond to

defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss,

both scheduled for hearing November 9, 2005. Plaintiff states he

has been out of the country for the past three weeks visiting his

ailing mother in Singapore, resulting in loss of time as well as

decline in his own health.

The court finds good cause to enlarge the time within which

plaintiff must respond to defendants’ motions. Fed. R. Civ. P.

6(b)(1). Plaintiff shall file his opposition to both motions on

Case 2:04-cv-02351-WBS-DAD Document 37 Filed 11/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

or before December 9, 2005; defendants may file their reply

briefs, if any, by December 23, 2005. 

The hearing on defendant’s motions is vacated and the

motions submitted for decision on the papers. Should the court

determine oral argument would be helpful, the matter will be

rescheduled for hearing at a time convenient to the parties.

So ordered.

Dated: November 7, 2005.

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 Peter A. Nowinski

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02351-WBS-DAD Document 37 Filed 11/07/05 Page 2 of 2