alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
acad-ex101_248.htm



Exhibit 10.1

 

***Text Omitted and Filed Separately

with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Confidential Treatment Requested

Under 17 C.F.R. Sections 200.80(b)(4) 

and 240.24b-2.

Second Amendment to Product Agreement 

between Patheon Pharmaceuticals Inc. and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

 

This Second Amendment to Product Agreement (the “Amendment”), dated October 6, 2016 (the “Amendment Date”), is made by and between Patheon Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Patheon”) and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“ACADIA”).  

 

WHEREAS, Patheon and ACADIA have entered into that certain Master Manufacturing Services Agreement, dated August 3, 2015 (the “MSA”) and that certain Product Agreement under the MSA, dated August 3, 2015, as amended on April 25, 2016 (the “Product Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, Patheon and ACADIA now wish to amend the Product Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.  All capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the respective meanings set forth in the MSA or Product Agreement, as applicable.

 

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the premises hereof and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.Amendment to Schedule C.  The stability pricing table on Schedule C of the Product Agreement is hereby amended and replaced with the stability pricing tables set forth on Exhibit 1 of this Amendment.  

  

2.Side Letter Agreements.  The parties hereby agree that any future changes to stability testing set forth in Schedule C of the Product Agreement, and any annual adjustments to Product pricing set forth in Schedule B of the Product Agreement pursuant to Section 4.2 of the MSA, may be documented via separate side letter agreement between Patheon and ACADIA.

 

3.No Other Modifications. Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Product Agreement including, without limitation, all other terms and conditions included in each of the amended Schedules, and the MSA, shall remain unchanged.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their authorized representatives, effective as of the Amendment Date.

 


	
Patheon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
	
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.  




 

 

By:  /s/ Nicholas M. BuschurBy:  /s/ James Nash

 

Name:  Nicholas M. BuschurName:  James Nash

 

 



 


	
Title:  Executive Director & GM
	
Title:   SVP, Technology Development &




Operations    

 

Exhibit 1

 

Updated Stability Pricing

 

[...***...]

 




2

 



 



[...***...]

 




3

 



 

[...***...]




4

 



 

[...***...]




5

 



 

[...***...]

6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Pursuant to the October 14, 2005 order, plaintiff’s amended complaint now must be

filed by November 28, 2005.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN W. LENTZ, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2617 LKK DAD P

vs.

DR. ATHAUASSIOUS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On October 24, 2005, plaintiff filed a second request for an extension of time to

file an amended complaint pursuant to the court’s order of August 22, 2005. It appears that

plaintiff’s request was sent before he received the court’s October 14, 2005 order which granted

plaintiff a 45-day extension to file his amended complaint.1 Therefore, plaintiff’s pending

request for an extension of time will be denied as duplicative. 

Plaintiff is advised that he is not required to submit a legal brief in support of the 

claims presented in his amended complaint. Instead, plaintiff should allege the facts that support

his claims and explain why he believes he is receiving inadequate medical care. The court has

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02617-LKK -DAD Document 10 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

previously provided plaintiff with the legal standards applicable to an Eighth Amendment claim,

and plaintiff should review those legal standards as he prepares his amended complaint. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s October 24, 2005 request

for an extension of time is denied without prejudice.

DATED: October 26, 2005.

DAD:4

lent2617.36s 

Case 2:04-cv-02617-LKK -DAD Document 10 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 52618.

protest 66127-K (New York).

#### The Symons Galleries, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation .of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the ease within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on entry 816249. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 10.2


 


Vitaxel Group Limited

2016 Equity Incentive Plan


 


Restricted Stock Agreement


 


Dear [                ],


 


On _________________, the board of directors
approved a grant of restricted stock (the "Restricted Stock") to you to purchase common stock of Vitaxel Group Limited
(the "Company") pursuant to the Vitaxel Group Limited 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan").


 


The Restricted Stock granted to you is
___ shares of common stock of the Company. The date of grant of the Restricted Stock is __________.The grant of the Restricted
Stock is made in consideration of services rendered to you on behalf of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company. The Restricted
Stock will vest upon issuance. 


 


The Plan is incorporated herein by reference.
The Plan and this Agreement constitute the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede
in their entirety all prior undertakings and agreements of the Company and you with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may
not be modified adversely to your interest except by means of a writing signed by the Company and you. This agreement is governed
by the laws of the State of Nevada.


 


By your signature and the signature of
the Company's representative below, you and the Company agree that the Restricted Stock is granted under and governed by the terms
and conditions of the Plan and this Agreement. You have reviewed the Plan and this Agreement in their entirety, have had an opportunity
to obtain the advice of counsel prior to executing this Agreement and fully understand all provisions of the Plan and this Agreement.
You hereby agree to accept as binding, conclusive and final all decisions or interpretations of the board of directors upon any
questions relating to the Plan and Agreement. You further agree to notify the Company upon any change in your residence address
indicated below.


 


	PARTICIPANT	 	VITAXEL GROUP LIMITED
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Signature	 	By
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Print Name	 	Title
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Residence Address
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0187 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 087 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 20110030 **Next Step:** F RAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comm ents received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



(Section 302 Certification)



I, Beth Sanders, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of 1st Centennial Bancorp;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2005                                
|                                                    
|/s/ Beth Sanders                                    
|Beth Sanders,                                       
|Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
Before the Third Division,

May 13, 1953

No. 57326.

protests 889065-G, etc. (Boston and New York).

#### American Cyanamid & Chemical Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

When this case was called for trial, it was submitted, and the right to move to reopen or set aside the submission was abandoned. An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the protests were overruled. (T. M. *Duche & Sons*v. *United States,*39 C. C. P. A. 186, C. A. D. 485, certiorari denied, *T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc.*v. *United States,*344 U. S. 830, followed.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Perez, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 656]

—Peters, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.), rendered September 11, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant’s conviction arises out of a May 1991 riot at South-port Correctional Facility in Chemung County where he was an inmate. Defendant was indicted and charged with two counts of assault in thé second degree and one count of promoting prison contraband in the first degree for stabbing a correction officer in the chest and back with a sharpened metal rod. Defendant ultimately pleaded guilty to one count of assault in the second degree in full satisfaction of the indictment. He was sentenced as a second felony offender to 31⁄2 to 7 years in prison, to be served consecutively with the sentence defendant was currently serving. This appeal followed.

Initially, we find that insofar as defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, he may not challenge the adequacy of his plea on this appeal (see, *People v Piazza,*214 AD2d 895). Were we to consider the merits of defendant’s arguments, we would find that defendant’s plea was knowing and voluntary and that he was fully apprised of the consequences thereof. Although defendant did state after he was sentenced that he pleaded as he did because he was afraid he could not get a fair trial, we note that he admitted stabbing the correction officer at the plea allocution after a thorough inquiry by County Court. Finally, we reject defendant’s claim that his sentence was harsh and excessive because he received the harshest permissible sentence as a second felony offender. Defendant received a substantial benefit by pleading as he did in satisfaction of a multicount indictment (see, *People v Van Buren,*212 AD2d 917, *lv denied*85 NY2d 915) and by avoiding persistent felony offender treatment.

Mercure, J. P., White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Before the Second Division,

January 6, 1943

No. 47886.

#### Protest 946777-G of New York Mdse. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *New York Merchandise Co.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607) the brass base shells in question were held dutiable at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 353, as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, as claimed. It was also stipulated that the *368marcel irons in question are chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained, following Abstract 38680.
No. 51723.

#### Protest 119747-K of Siegfried Loewenthal Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of barrels numbered 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 34, 37, 46, and 49, was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gauger’s return as verified by the affidavit of the importer. The protest was sustained to this extent.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Synkera Technologies, Inc. Under Contract No. N68335-05-C-0304 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59104

Mr. Brian L. Sperry

Vice President & ChiefFinancial Officer E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Carol L. Matsunaga, Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Carson, CA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The parties have settled this appeal as a result ofBoard-assisted mediation. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, with prejudice. Dated: 23 July 2015



# ... • """"" t Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 59104, Appeal ofSynkera Technologies, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
No. 54694.

#### R. Neumann & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 125320-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the-court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wired Associates Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy
Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of March, 2008.


/s/ Roy Brown
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

July 7, 1941

No. 46160.

#### Protests 979818-G, etc., of N. S. Meyer, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the woven fabrics are similar to those involved in *Meyer*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 191, C. D. 459) the protests were sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

             CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 16 - GLOBAL INCORPORATED

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corporate Property Associates
16-Global Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Claude Fernandez, acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Claude Fernandez
    -----------------------------------
    Claude Fernandez
    acting Chief Financial Officer

         8/15/2005
    Date

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# C_2007047EN.01001201.xml

| 1.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/12

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2007/C 47/12)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1), following which no request for a review was received, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Zinc oxides | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 408/2002 (OJ L 62, 5.3.2002, p. 7) extended to imports consigned from Vietnam, whether declared as originating in Vietnam or not by Council Regulation (EC) No 1623/2003 (OJ L 232, 18.9.2003, p. 1) and extended to imports of zinc oxides mixed with silica originating in the People's Republic of China by Council Regulation (EC) No 1623/2003 (OJ L 232, 18.9.2003, p. 1) | 6.3.2007 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Zinc oxides

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 408/2002 (OJ L 62, 5.3.2002, p. 7) extended to imports consigned from Vietnam, whether declared as originating in Vietnam or not by Council Regulation (EC) No 1623/2003 (OJ L 232, 18.9.2003, p. 1) and extended to imports of zinc oxides mixed with silica originating in the People's Republic of China by Council Regulation (EC) No 1623/2003 (OJ L 232, 18.9.2003, p. 1)

6.3.2007

---

(1)  OJ C 147, 23.6.2006, p. 7.

1

(2)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

2

---
No. 64169.

protests 59/26562 and 59/26862 (New York).

#### A.U.T. Customs Brokers, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.