## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 20

- 00104

- CR

RANDALL REYNOLDS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. 2027794

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION

On August 3 , 20 20 , Randall Reynolds pled guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly

weapon , in t his case, a motor vehicle. 1 On A ugust 26 , at a sentenci n g hearing , the trial court found Reynolds guilty of the charged offense and sentenced him to five years ’ incarceration. Reynolds appeals that conviction and sentence. Reynolds ’ s appellate counsel filed a brief that outlined the procedural history of the c ase, provided a detailed summary of the evidence elicited during the trial court proceedings, and

stated that counsel found no meritorious issu es to raise on appeal. Since counsel has provided a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why the r e are no arguable grounds to be

advanced , he has m et his duty under the law

. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 743

– 44
(1967); In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding);
Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 509

– 10 ( T ex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d
807, 812

– 13 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Reynol ds ’ s c ounsel filed a motion with this Court seeking to withdraw as counsel in this appeal and provided Reynolds with a copy of the brief and the moti on t o withdraw. His c ounsel

also informed Reynolds of his right to review the record and file a pro se response and provided Reynolds with an unsigned motion for access to the record

. On January 26 , 202 1 , the Court notified Reynolds that , if he wished to fi le a pro se response to his counsel ’ s Anders brie f , any such respon s e w a s due on or before February 25,

2021. We have received no such response or request for extension from Reynolds

.

1 See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN

. § 22.02

.3

We have reviewed the entire appellate record and have independently det ermined that no

reversible error exists. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W

. 3 d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

W e affirm the judgment of the trial court. 2

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice Date Submitted : March 31, 202 1 Date Decided: April 21 , 202 1

Do Not Publish

2 Since we ag ree th a t this ca se presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders , grant counsel's request to withdraw from further representation of Appellant in this case. See Anders , 38 6 U.S. at 744. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Appell a n t desi re to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Appellant must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discret ionary r e view m u s t be (1) filed within thirty days from either the date of this opinion or the date on which the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by this Court, see T EX . R. A PP

. P . 68.2, (2) fil ed with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeal s , see T E X . R. A PP . P. 68.3, and (3) in compl iance with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, see T EX

. R. A PP . P. 68.4.