alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Case Financial, Inc., (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Eric A. Alden, the principal accounting officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13a-14(b)
            or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: January 12, 2004

                                       /s/ Eric A. Alden
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Eric A. Alden
                                       Principal Accounting Officer


                                       63
Before the Second Division,

June 12, 1962

No. 66851.

#### Globe Importing Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/4933, etc. (New York).

*479Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of aerators in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65882, the claim at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 339 (19 U.S.C. §1001, par. 339), as modified by T.D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), for brass household utensils, not specially provided for, or at 13% or 12% percent, depending upon the date of entry, under said paragraph, as modified by T.D. 54108, was sustained. The items marked “AA,” stipulated to consist of aerators the same as those the subject of Abstract 65882, except that they are in chief value of zinc, were held dutiable at 19 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified, *supra,*for household utensils, not specially provided for, composed of other base metal.
No. 52036.

#### Eurasia Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 6600-R (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the facts and circumstances surrounding the making of the entry herein are similar in all material respects to the facts and circumstances surrounding the making of the entries in Abstract 51892. Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited decision the court held that the entry of the merchandise at a value less than that found on final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 62559.

#### C. S. Emery & Company *v.*United States,

protest 326279-K (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Border Brokerage Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antonio Santiago, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 5]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered October 30, 1990, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that the procedure used in his photographic identification was unduly suggestive is without merit, there being no reason to conclude that the books of photographs examined by the witnesses were arranged in a way that singled out defendant, or that the identifying witness *250was prompted by either the police or the complainant. The independent source for an in-court identification was established, although our finding of lack of suggestiveness obviates the issue. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.
No. 58035.

protests 190617-K and 191479-K (New York).

#### Munson G. Shaw Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Case No. 15,075.

#### UNITED STATES v. FARRING.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 465.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

May Term, 1834.

Criminal, Law—Effect of Nolle Prosequi.

A nolle prosequi, without the consent of the defendant, after the jury has been sworn, is equivalent to an a iquittal, and may be so pleaded.

[Cited in brief in State v. Champeau, 52 Vt. 315; State v. Primm, 61 Mo. 168.j

Indictment for larceny [against John Far-ring].

The defendant had been indicted at this term for stealing two silver dollars, and an order drawn by Hoffman and Stephenson on - for $15. Upon the trial, the order, produced .In evidence, was drawn by Hoff-mans and Stephenson.

Mr. Key, for the United States,

thereupon directed the clerk to enter a nolle prosequi, and the jury was discharged without the consent of the defendant, and a new indictment was found by the grand jury, reciting the order truly. A verdict of guilty was found upon this second indictment, subject to the effect of the nolle prosequi and discharge of the jury, as if specially pleaded. Motion in arrest of judgment for that cause.

Mr. Taylor, for defendant.

It is only in eases of inevitable necessity that a jury can be discharged without the consent of the defendant. Wedderbum’s Case,. Fost. Crown Law, 22g; 1 Chit. Cr. Law, 630.

Mr. Key, contra.

It is now brought to a reasonable rule. Wherever it is' for the benefit of, or is indifferent to, the prisoner, the jury may be discharged without his consent, as in the case of the sudden illness of a juror or witness, or where a witness is kept out of the way by the prisoner, or other accident. A mistake of a single letter in an indictment is an accident, like the illness of a witness or juror. 1 Chit. 631, note; 2 Johns. Cas. 275, 301; 2 Caines, 100, 304; Cogan’s Case, Leach, 167. But this is not an indictment for the same offence. The order could not have been given in evidence upon the former indictment.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, ■ contra)

arrested the judgment, being of opinion that the discharge of the jury without the defendant’s consent was equivalent to an acquittal as to the dollars, and that the defendant might have pleaded it with an averment that the stealing of the dollars and of the order was one act of taking, if such an averment be necessary; which is doubtful, as the indictment charges it to be one act of theft, and upon a general verdict of guilty he would havé been sentenced to the penitentiary.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-29375 

04-APR-2011 

12:30 PM NO. SCWC-29375
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

STEVE OSHIRO, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(ICA NO. 29375; CR. NO. 07-1-0957)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 1
 (By: Duffy, J., for the court )


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Steve Oshiro’s 


application for writ of certiorari, filed on February 22, 2011,
 

is hereby rejected. 


DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, April 4, 2011. 

FOR THE COURT:
 

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. 


Associate Justice
 

Michael Jay Green


for petitioner/defendantappellant on the application
 

Delanie D. Prescott-Tate,


Deputy Prosecuting Attorney,


for respondent/plaintiffappellee on the response
 

1
 Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.,
 

and Circuit Judge Alm, assigned by reason of vacancy.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
B R IAN R O SS, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt,
v. U.S. B ANK NA, a s Truste e for the LXS 2007-7N Trust Fund, a

Nationa l Assoc iation; B AC HOM E LOANS SER VIC ING, LP, a

Te xa s Lim ite d Partne rship; ALL PER SONS UNKNOW N C LAIM ING ANY LEGAL OR EQUITAB LE RIGHT, TITLE, ESTATE, LIEN OR INTEREST IN THE PR OPER TY DESC R IB ED IN THE C OM PLAINT ADVER SE TO PLAINTIFF’ S TITLE THER ETO; De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-56291 D.C . No. 3:12-c v-02640-B ENJM A
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia R oge r T. B e nite z , Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Argue d a nd Subm itte d Oc tobe r 21, 2015 Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia 

# FIL ED OCT 30 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.B e fore : R

AW LINSON a

nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s and PONSOR , ** Se nior Distric t Judge
. Appe lla nt B rian R oss (R oss) c ha lle nge s the distric t c ourt’ s dismissa l of his fe de ra l c o m

pla int a lle ging tha

t U.S. B a nk im prope rly sought fore c losure of his prope rty . The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d R oss’ fe de ra l c om pla int ba se d on
c olla te ra l e s toppe l. R oss’ fe de ra l c la im s a re m e re ly the sa m e c ha lle nge pre m ise d on diffe re nt le ga l the orie s to thefore c losure a c tion tha t wa s c onc lusive ly

re solve d in sta te c ourt. Se e Mills v . U.S. Bank , 166 C a l .App.4th 871, 896 (2008) (artic ulating tha

t “ a form e r judgm e nt . . . is a c olla te ra l e stoppe l on issue s whic h
we re ra ise d, e v e n though some fac tual matters or le

gal arguments w hic h c o uld hav ebe e n pre

se n te d w e re not” ) (c ita

tions omitte d) (e m

pha sis in the origina l); se e also E v ans v . C e lote x C orp. , 194 C a l.App.3d 741, 746-47 (1987) (sta ting tha t

“ [c ] olla te ra l e stoppe l ba

rs re litiga tion of thesa

m e issue s; it doe s not re quire ide ntity of le ga l the o rie s or c a

use s of a c t ion. If it did, the re would beno e nd to litiga tion for injurie s a

rising out of the

sa m e fa c ts, a s long a s a

pa rty c o uld offe r
anothe r le ga l the ory

by whic h the sa

m e issue m ight bediffe re ntly de c i de d” ) (c ita tion omitte d).

** The Honora

ble M ic ha e l A. Ponsor, Se nior Distric t Judge for the U.S. Distric t C ourt for M a ssa c huse tts, sitting by de s igna tion. 2R oss’ argum e nt tha t c olla te ra l e s toppe l is ina

p plic a ble be c a use U.S. B ank
wa s not a pa rty to the sta te a c tion is una

va iling. Se eDK

N Holdings LLC

v . Fae rbe r , 352 P.3d 378, 387 (C a l. 2015) (re c ogniz ing tha t “ [o] nly the pa rty against
w hom the doc trine is invoke d m ust be bound by

the prior proc e e ding. . . .” ) (c ita tion omitte d) (e m

pha sis in the

origina l). AFFIRM E D.

3
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5682]


U.S. Department of State Advisory Committee on Private 
International Law: Study Group on Consumer Protection

    One of the goals of the Organization of American States is to 
harmonize private international law through Inter-American Specialized 
Conferences on Private International Law (CIDIP). The OAS has hosted 
these conferences every four to six years. Currently states are 
drafting instruments for ``CIDIP-VII,'' which will focus inter alia on 
consumer protection. States are currently reviewing a draft Brazilian 
treaty on choice of law, a Canadian draft model law on choice of law 
and jurisdiction, and a U.S. proposal for a model law on the 
availability of consumer dispute resolution and redress. OAS member 
states discussed the three proposals at an initial meeting held in 
Porto Alegre, Brazil in December. No dates have been set for future 
meetings, but the views of participating states have been requested.
    The Department of State Advisory Committee on Private International 
Law (ACPIL) will hold a public meeting to review the results of the 
Porto Alegre meeting and to obtain views on the three proposals with 
regard to consumer protection.
    Time: The public meeting will take place at the Federal Trade 
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Room H-481, Washington, DC on 
March 22, 2007 from 10 a.m. EST to 12 p.m. EST. If you are unable to 
attend the public meeting and you would like to participate by 
teleconferencing, please contact Trisha Smeltzer to receive the 
conference call in number and the relevant materials. .
    Public Participation: Advisory Committee Study Group meetings are 
open to the public. Persons wishing to attend should contact Trisha 
Smeltzer at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ec9f8189809896899e9887ac9f988d9889c28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5d6c8c0c9d1dfc0d7d1cee5d6d1c4d1c08bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a> or at 202-776-8423 and provide your 
name, e-mail address, and affiliation(s). Additional meeting 
information can also be obtained from Ms. Smeltzer. Persons who cannot 
attend but who wish to comment on any of the proposals are welcome to 
do so by e-mail to Michael Dennis at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b7f5e5555524876717b484f5a4f5e155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="195d7c7777706a5453596a6d786d7c377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 2, 2007.
Michael Dennis,
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Advisor, Office of Private 
International Law, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E7-4319 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Grant Prideco, Inc.
 March 3, 2006
    
    /s/     MICHAEL MCSHANEName: Michael McShaneTitle:   President and Chief Executive Officer/s/     MATTHEW D. FITZGERALDName: Matthew D. FitzgeraldTitle:   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 49199.

#### Protests 815967-G, etc., of Alliance Distributors, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-328-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

March 6, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 1, 2007, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to 
become effective April 1, 2007:

Twenty-Sixth Revised Sheet No. 29
Twenty-First Revised Sheet No. 44
Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 61
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 61A

    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
affected customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#40060512030f2e2c292e25133530302f323400262532236e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4390 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 51702.

#### Protests 106594-K, etc., of D. M. Hatton & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of henna powder similar in all material respects to that the subject of *J. L. Hopkins & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(34 C. C. P. A. 67, C. A. D. 344). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1670 was sustained.
```

[Federal Register: August 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 159)]
[Notices]               
[Page 51016]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18au10-64]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday September 24, 2010.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-20605 Filed 8-16-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

       Timothy P. Walbridge and Beth Sanders hereby certify as follows:

       1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of 1st Centennial Bancorp.

       2. The Form 10-KSB of 1st Centennial Bancorp for the Year Ended December
31, 2002 complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information
contained in the report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 1st Centennial
Bancorp.


                                           /s/ Timothy P. Walbridge
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Timothy P. Walbridge, Chief Executive
                                           Officer

                                           /s/ Beth Sanders
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Beth Sanders, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4438]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 27, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Tyson Aaron Rucker, Eureka, Kansas, and Bradley Dean Rucker, 
Wichita, Kansas; to become members of a group acting in concert to 
acquire voting shares of Greenwood County Financial Services, Inc, 
Eureka, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Home 
Bank and Trust Company, Eureka, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 7, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-4438 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S