The Acting EPA Regional Administrator, Deborah Jordan, signe d the following rule on May 6 , 2016 and

EPA is submitting it for publication in the Federal Register (FR). While we have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version of this rule, it is not the official version. Please refer to the official version in a forthcoming FR publication appearing on the Government Printi ng Office website, http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action, and on www.regulations.gov in Docket Number EPA

R09

- OAR

- 2015

- 0793

. Billing Code: 6560

- 50

- P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52 [EPA
- R09
- OAR
- 2015
- 0793; FRL
- _________] Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Arizona; Infrastructure Requirements to Address Interstate Transport for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: EPA is approving in part and disapproving in part State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision s submitted by the Arizona Depart ment of Environmental Quality to address the interstate transport requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) section 110(a)(2)(D) (i) with respect to the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). We are approving the portion of the Arizona SIP pertaining to significant contribution to nonattainment or interfere nce with maintenance in another state and disapproving the portion of Arizona’s SIP pertaining to interstate transport visibility requirements. Where EPA is disapproving a portion of the Arizona SIP revision , the deficiencies have already been addressed by a federal implementation plan (FIP)

. DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on [ insert date 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register ].This document is a prepublication version signed by Acting EPA Regional Administrator Deborah Jordan

on May 6, 2016 . We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

2 ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2015

- 0793 for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105

- 3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov , some information may be publicly available o nly at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi

- volume reports), and some may not be available in either location (e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointme nt during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Kelly , Air Planning Office (AIR

– 2), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 972

– 3856, kelly.thomasp@epa.gov

. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to EPA. TABLE OF CONTENTS:

I. Background

II. Public Comments

III. Final Action

IV

. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

CAA section s 110(a)(1) and (2) require states to address basic SIP requirements to implement, maintain and enforce the NAAQS no later than three years after the promulgation ofThis document is a prepublication version signed by Acting EPA Regional Administrator Deborah Jordan

on May 6, 2016 . We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

3 a new or revised standard

. S ection 110(a)(2) outlines the specific requirements that each state is required to address in this SIP submission that collectively constitute the "infrastructure" of a state's air quality management program

. SIP submittals that address these requirement s are referred to as “infrastructure SIPs” (I

- SIP). In particular, CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) require s that each SIP for a new or revised NAAQS contain adequate provisions to prohibit any source or other type of emissions activity within the state from emitting air pollutants that will “contribute significantly to nonattainment” (prong 1) or “interfere wit h maintenance” (prong 2) of the applicable air quality standard in any other state. CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) requires SIP provisions that prevent interference with measures required to be included in the applicable implementation plan for any other State under part C to prevent significant deterioration of air quality (prong 3) or to protect visibility (prong 4). This action address es the section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) requirements of prongs 1, 2 and 4 with respect to Arizona’s I

- SIP submissions. On March 2 7, 2008, EPA is sued a revised NAAQS for ozone . 1 This action triggered a requirement for states to submit an I

- SIP to address the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2) within three years of issuance of the revised NAAQS. On December 27, 2012, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) submitted its 2008 ozone NAAQS I

- SIP

. On December 3, 2015, ADEQ submitted a supplement to the 2012 submittal further addressing 110(a)(2)(D)(i) prongs 1, 2, and 4. 2

On July 14, 2015 , EPA partial ly approved and partial ly disapproved Arizona’s 2012

1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone; Final Rule, 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). 2 “ Arizona State Implementation Plan Revisions for 2008 Ozone and 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide Under Cle an Air Act Section 1 10(a)(2)(D). . .” Signed December 3, 2015. A lso see e mail from Heidi Haggerty of ADEQ: AZ 2015 Ozone Transport I

- SIP Submittal Clarificati on. Sent December 9, 2015.This document is a prepublication version signed by Acting EPA Regional Administrator Deborah Jordan

on May 6, 2016 . We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

4 submittal for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for th e I

- SIP elements C, D, J, and K. EPA partially approved and partially disapproved the submittal for purposes of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) prong 3 and partially approved and partially disapproved the submittal for purposes of 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) (relating to CAA sections 115 and 126). 3 We subsequently took action on I

- SIP elements A, B,
E

- H, L, and M for the 2008 ozone NAAQS on August 10, 2015. 4 We also sta ted our intention to propose action on the I

- SIP submittal for the 2008 ozone NAAQS 110(a)(2)(D)(i) prongs 1, 2, and 4 in an additional action. 5 Additionally, p ursuant to a judgment issued by the Northern District of California in Sierra Club vs. McCarthy , EPA must take final action on 110(a)(2)(D) prongs 1 , 2 , and 4 of Arizona’s December 2012 SIP revision by June 7, 2016. 6
On M arch 22, 2016 , EPA proposed to approve in par t, and disapprove in part, the 2012 and 2015 SIP revisions addressing the infrastructure requirements of CAA section 110(a) (2)(D)(i) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS

. 7 The rationale supporting EPA's actions is explained in our proposal notice and the associated TSD and will not be restated here. The proposed rule and TSD are available online at http://www.regulations.gov , Docket ID number
EPA

– R09

– OAR

– 2015

– 0793

.
II. Public Comments EPA received no comments on the proposed action during the public comment period.

III. Final Action

3 Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Arizona; Infrastructure Requirements for Lead and Ozone. 80 FR 40905 ( July 14, 2015 ). 4 Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; Arizona; Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Lead (Pb) and the 2008 8

- Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). 80 FR 47859 ( August 10, 2015 )

. 5 Id. 6 Judgment, Sierra Club v. McCarthy, Case 4:14

- cv - 05091

- YGR (N.D. Cal. May 15, 2015 )

. 7 Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Arizona; Infrastructure Requirements to Address Interstate Transport for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS. 81 FR 1520. (Ma rch 22, 2016).This document is a prepublication version signed by Acting EPA Regional Administrator Deborah Jordan

on May 6, 2016 . We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

5 Under CAA section 110(k)(3), and based on the evaluation and rationale presented in the proposed rule, the related TSD , and this final rule, EPA is approving in part and disapproving in part Arizona SIP revision s address ing the interstate transport requiremen ts of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA is approving Arizona ’s SIP as meeting the interstate transport requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) prongs 1 and 2 for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA is disapproving Arizona ’s SIP with respect to the interstate transport requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)( II) prong 4 for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, because EPA has issued Regional Haze FIPs addressing visibility requirements in Arizona , no additional FIP obligation is triggered by the disapproval of this portion of Arizona’s infrastructure SIP. EPA will continue to work with Arizona to incorporate emission limits to address the requirements of the Regional Haze Rule into the state SIP. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws

- regulations/laws

- and

- executive

- orders

. A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review This action is not a significant regulatory action and was therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This action does not impose an information collection burden under the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)This document is a prepublication version signed by Acting EPA Regional Administrator Deborah Jordan

on May 6, 2016 . We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

6 I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This action will not impose any requirements on small entities b eyond those imposed by state law. D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531

– 1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action does not impo se additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, will result from this action. E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have fe deralism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175, because the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction, and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Chil dren from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe mayThis document is a prepublication version signed by Acting EPA Regional Administrator Deborah Jordan

on May 6, 2016 . We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

7 disproportionately affect c hildren, per the definition of “covered regulatory action” in section 2

- 202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. H. Executive Order 13211: Actions that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. I. National Technology Transfer and Advancemen t Act (NTTAA) Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low

- Income Population The EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address environmental justice in this rulemaking. K. Congressional Review Act (CRA) This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller Gene ral of the United States. This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). L. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by [insert date 60 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register]. Filin g a petition for reconsideration byThis document is a prepublication version signed by Acting EPA Regional Administrator Deborah Jordan

on May 6, 2016 . We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

8 the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postp one the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Air pollution control, Approval and promulgation of implementation plans, Environmental protection, Incorporation by reference, Oxides of nitrogen, Ozone, and Volatile organic compounds

.

May 6, 2016.

_ //signed//

_________________ Dated: Deborah Jordan , Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.