alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4298]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of the Census


Census Advisory Committee of Professional Associations

AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of the Census (U.S. Census Bureau) is giving notice 
of a meeting of the Census Advisory Committee of Professional 
Associations. The Committee will address policy, research, and 
technical issues related to 2010 Decennial Census Programs. The 
Committee will also discuss several economic initiatives and 
demographic program topics, as well as issues pertaining to 2010 
communications. Last minute changes to the agenda are possible, which 
could prevent giving advance public notice of schedule adjustments.

DATES: April 19-20, 2007. On April 19, the meeting will begin at 8:30 
a.m. and adjourn at approximately 5 p.m. On April 20, the meeting will 
begin at 8:15 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 12:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Census Bureau, 4600 
Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeri Green, Committee Liaison Officer, 
Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Room HQ-8H153, North 
Building, Washington, DC 20233. Her telephone number is 301-763-6590, 
TDD 301-457-2540.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Census Advisory Committee of 
Professional Associations is composed of 36 members, appointed by the 
presidents of the American Economic Association, the American 
Statistical Association, the Population Association of America, and the 
Chairperson of the Board of the American Marketing Association. The 
Committee addresses Census Bureau programs and activities related to 
each respective association's area of expertise. The Committee has been 
established in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Title 5, United States Code, Appendix 2, Section 10(a)(b)).
    The meeting is open to the public, and a brief period is set aside 
for public comment and questions. Persons with extensive questions or 
statements must submit them in writing at least three days before the 
meeting to the Committee Liaison Officer named above. Seating is 
available to the public on a first-come, first-served basis.
    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should also be directed to the Committee Liaison Officer.

    Dated: March 2, 2007.
Charles Louis Kincannon,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
 [FR Doc. E7-4298 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P
Exhibit 10.2


 


 


October 14, 2016


 


Scott Davis


5127 Rowley Falls Ln


Sugar Land, TX 77479


 


 


Re:Amendment of Employment Letter


 


Dear Scott:


 


This letter constitutes
an amendment, effective immediately, to the employment letter between you and Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
dated April 19, 2016 (the “Employment Letter”). Your title shall now be Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Secretary
and you shall report to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Upon approval from the Board of Directors, you shall also serve
as principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of the Company. Your duties and responsibilities shall be such
as is reasonably assigned to you by the Chief Executive Officer. The Base Salary (as defined in the Employment Letter) shall be
increased to $200,000 per annum for the remainder of the term of the Employment Letter. Pending approval by the Compensation Committee,
you shall also receive an award of restricted stock, with an aggregate value of $50,000.00 and the number of shares determined
in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, vesting in four equal annual
installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date hereof.


 


This letter does not
affect any other terms of the Employment Letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please let me know.


 


 





	 	SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
	 	 
	 	/s/ DeLome Fair
	 	DeLome Fair
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer



 


Acknowledged and Agreed on


October 14, 2016



	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Scott Davis	 	 
	Scott Davis
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Innovation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Blagman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert Blagman
Robert Blagman
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL McCEE FOUNTAIN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2350 GEB DAD P

vs.

JAMES YATES, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 4, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Petitioner has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-02350-GEB-DAD Document 69 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 4, 2010, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner’s March 19, 2010, request for reconsideration, construed as a

successive habeas petition (Docket No. 58), is dismissed without prejudice to its refiling after 

obtaining authorization from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; and

3. For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s June 4, 2010 findings and

recommendations, petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue in this action.

Dated: July 12, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02350-GEB-DAD Document 69 Filed 07/13/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 13.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Chartwell  Technology  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 20-F for the year ended  October 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Darold
H.  Parken,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


                                        Signed "Darold H. Parken"
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Darold H. Parken
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        May 16, 2005
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #10819 and #10820]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Georgia (FEMA-1686-DR), dated 03/03/2007. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         03/01/2007 through 03/02/2007. *Effective Date:*
                         03/03/2007. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/02/2007. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/03/2007.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to:  U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 03/03/2007, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*
                    Sumter. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*
                    Georgia: Crisp, Dooly, Lee, Macon, Marion, Schley, Terrell, and Webster. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.750Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.875Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000For Economic InjuryBusinesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10819B and for economic injury is 108200. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008.) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E7-4363 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
October 15, 1951

No. 55928.

protest 149225-K.

#### Package Machinery Company *v.*United States,

C. D. 1354. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
(Reap. Dec. 8660)

Entry No. WH 12936.

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp. *v.*United States

(Decided September 26, 1956)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States concerning the merchandise referred to herein, as follows:

> 1. Said merchandise consists of binoculars and leather carrying cases which, in *JOHN P. BERBER & CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES,*C. D. 1519, this Court held to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of articles.

> 2. At the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers, in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, is as follows in U. S. currency, net packed, there being no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise:

> 100 pcs. 6 x 15 Binoculars with Cases

> Binoculars — each_$5. 10

> Carrying Cases — each_ . 50

> 200 pcs. 6 x 15 Binoculars with Cases

> Binoculars — each_$4. 50

> Carrying Cases — each_ . 50

> 3. The above reappraisement is abandoned as to all merchandise not listed herein, and said reappraisement may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows, net packed:

> 100 pcs. 6 x 15 binoculars with cases

> Binoculars — each_$5. 10

> Carrying cases — each_ 0. 50

> 200 pcs. 6 x 15 binoculars with cases

> Binoculars — each_$4. 50

> Carrying cases — each_ 0. 50

*518The appeal haying been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Approved under assigned authority

on March 4, 2010*

__Linda L. Lundell (for) _____

Director, Office of International Aviation

 *

 Based on the circumstances presented regarding Mesa’s temporary cessation of its Phoenix-Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo 

service on April 12, 2010, we have granted Mesa’s request for a temporary dormancy waiver to allow the 90-day 

dormancy notice period to begin on September 11, 2010, the date Mesa proposes recommencement of the 

subject service.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Errol Brown, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 84]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Elbert Hinkson, J.), rendered January 15, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the admission of hearsay evidence to prove the identity of the victim and the cause of his death is without merit. The People were not required to prove the identity of the decedent *271in order to prove the charge of murder in the second degree, but rather, only that defendant caused the death of another person (Penal Law § 125.05 [1]; *see, People v Applegate,*176 AD2d 888, 889, *lv denied*79 NY2d 853; *People v Grega,*72 NY2d 489, 497). In any event, the report from the Medical Examiner’s Office was properly admitted as a certified public document and constituted prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein, including the identification of the body (CPLR 4520; *see, People v Brownlee,*121 AD2d 553, 554, *lv denied*68 NY2d 768). Moreover, even without the challenged evidence, the remaining proof, including the witness’s identification of the deceased’s photograph as the person who had been with defendant prior to shots being fired and the deceased’s disappearance, amply established the identity of the victim, the fact that it was his body which was found and which was later autopsied and the cause of death *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620).

There was no evidence from which it could reasonably be inferred that the People’s witness participated in the planning or execution of the crime. Thus, the trial court properly refused any charge as to accomplice liability *(People v Jones,*73 NY2d 902; *People v Tucker,*72 NY2d 849). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTIN FRUTOS, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2361 GEB PAN P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file a response to the court’s May

11, 2006 order. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's May 30, 2006 application for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff shall file a response to the court’s May 11, 2006 order on or before

June 24, 2006.

DATED: June 12, 2006.

/mp

frut2361.36

Case 2:04-cv-02361-ALA Document 14 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 60862.

#### The Glidden Company v. United States,

protest 287296-K (Philadelphia).

*540Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal drums similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Norman G. Jensen, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 176, C. D. 1600), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

June 20, 1962

No. 66867.

#### Victoria Distributors, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/15211 and 61/21983 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Fourth Department,

November, 1995

(November 15, 1995)

#### Geraldine E. Alexander, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Brandon C. Alexander, an Infant, Respondent, v Kendall Central School District, Defendant, and Ralph Perrigo, Appellant.

[634 NYS2d 318]

—Order unani*899mously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff, individually and as parent and natural guardian of her son, commenced this action against, *inter alia,*Ralph Perrigo (defendant), the president and head coach of the Kendall Youth Wrestling Club, alleging that her son was injured when he was driven from the mat and struck a scoring table during a match at a wrestling tournament. Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Contrary to defendant’s argument, the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk does not bar this action because plaintiff’s expert raised questions of fact whether the placement of the scoring table at the wrestling tournament and the organization and operation of the tournament created risks beyond those inherent in the sport of wrestling that plaintiff’s son assumed *(see, Owen v R.J.S. Safety Equip.,*79 NY2d 967, 970; *McCrorey v City of Buffalo,*210 AD2d 908; *Lamey v Foley,*188 AD2d 157, 163-164).

With respect to the release allegedly signed by plaintiff or her husband, even assuming, arguendo, that it had been signed, it is void because the exculpatory clause therein does not "plainly and precisely” limit the liability of defendant for his own negligent acts *(Gross v Sweet,*49 NY2d 102, 107). The exculpatory clause states only that the parent releases all rights and claims for damages against defendant "for any and all injuries suffered” by the child or the parent at the wrestling tournament. Such "broad and sweeping language” is ineffective to bar an action against defendant for his negligence *(Gross v Sweet, supra,*at 108). Furthermore, a minor is not bound by a release executed by his parent *(see, Santangelo v City of New York,*66 AD2d 880, 881; *see also, Shields v Gross,*58 NY2d 338, 344, *rearg denied*59 NY2d 762; *Rotary v Spencer Speedway,*47 AD2d 127, 130). Thus, despite the absence of a cross appeal by plaintiff from the denial of her cross motion to dismiss the affirmative defense of waiver and release *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]; *Merritt Hill Vineyards v Windy Hgts. Vineyard,*61 NY2d 106, 110-112), we modify the order on appeal by granting that cross motion. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Orleans County, Gorski, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4498]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as Amended by Public Law 104-13; 
Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The proposed information collection described below will be 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, 
as amended). The Tennessee Valley Authority is soliciting public 
comments on this proposed collection as provided by 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1). 
Requests for information, including copies of the information 
collection proposed and supporting documentation, should be directed to 
the Agency Clearance Officer: Alice D. Witt, Tennessee Valley 
Authority, 1101 Market Street (EB 5B), Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-
2801; (423) 751-6832. (SC: 0009BL5) Comments should be sent to the 
Agency Clearance Officer no later than May 14, 2007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Type of Request: Regular submission, proposal to extend with 
revisions to the currently approved collection of information (OMB 
control number 3316-0019).
    Title of Information Collection: energy right<SUP>[reg]</SUP> 
Program.
    Frequency of Use: Daily.
    Type of Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Small Business or Organizations Affected: No.
    Federal Budget Functional Category Code: 271.
    Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 29,000.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 8,700.
    Estimated Average Burden Hours Per Response: .3.
    This information is used by distributors of TVA power to assist in 
identifying and financing energy improvements for their electrical 
energy customers.

Terry G. Tyler,
General Manager, Architecture, Planning, & Compliance, Information 
Services.
 [FR Doc. E7-4498 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P