alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Terence Walsh, Appellant, v Design Concepts, Ltd., et al., Respondents.

[633 NYS2d 579]

—In a *455proceeding for the dissolution of a corporation and an accounting, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.), dated March 2, 1994, which (1) denied his motion to (a) renew a prior order of the same court, dated June 23, 1993, directing him to keep all discovery in the instant proceeding confidential, and (b) enjoin Design Concepts, Ltd., from conducting any business without express leave of the court, and (2) granted the cross motion of Design Concepts, Ltd., and Bruce Zipes for a joint trial of the instant proceeding and another action also pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entitled *Zipes v Walsh*(Index No. 6359/92), and to extend the confidentiality provision contained in the order dated June 23, 1993, to cover proceedings in *Zipes v Walsh.*

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s assertion, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting a protective order proscribing the dissemination of information obtained via discovery. Pursuant to CPLR 3103 (former [a]) "[t]he court may at any time on its own initiative, or on motion of any [other] party or witness, make a protective order denying, limiting, conditioning or regulating the use of any disclosure device”. Its discretion in such matters is broad, and upon our review of the record we find that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion *(see, Krygier v Airweld, Inc.,*176 AD2d 701; *Kaplan v Herbstein,*175 AD2d 200; *Fischer v Deitsch,*168 AD2d 599; *McLaughlin v G. D. Searle, Inc.,*38 AD2d 810).

Furthermore, the court did not err in denying the petitioner’s motion for a preliminary injunction. It is well settled that in order to obtain a preliminary injunction a movant must demonstrate (1) a likelihood of ultimate success on the merits, (2) irreparable harm unless the injunction is granted, and (3) that the equities are balanced in its favor *(see, Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso,*75 NY2d 860, 862; *Grant Co. v Srogi,*52 NY2d 496, 517; *NCN Co. v Cavanagh,*215 AD2d 737; *Fischer v Deitch, supra,*at 600). "Irreparable injury, for purposes of equity, has been held to mean any injury for which money damages are insufficient” *(McLaughlin, Piven, Vogel v Nolan & Co.,*114 AD2d 165, 174; *see also, Jurlique, Inc. v Austral Biolah Pty.,*187 AD2d 637; *Lawrence H. Morse, Inc. v Anson,*185 AD2d 505; *Fischer v Deitch, supra,*at 600). In the case at bar, where, *inter alia,*sharp issues of fact are presented, and compensation is available in the form of money damages, the petitioner failed to meet his burden.

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
(Reap. Dec. 8251)

#### Hohenberg Company, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 709040, etc.

(Decided September 17, 1953)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have all been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement which are enumerated on Schedule A, attached hereto, is wool yarn which was imported from Belgium;

> 2. That the appraised value of each item of said merchandise covered by said appeals for reappraisement, less the addition made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases pending on appeal for reap-praisement, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of said merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States;

> 3. That the market value or the price at the time of exportation of said merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was offered for sale as referred to in paragraph 2 of this stipulation, but for exportation to the United States instead of for home consumption in the country from which exported, was not higher than the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was thus offered for sale for home consumption in that country;

> 4. That said appeals for reappraisement may be submitted for decision on this stipulation and on the invoices, entries and other official papers relating to the entry and appraisement of said merchandise covered by said appeals.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the appraised value of each item, less the addition made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases pending on appeal for reappraisement.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP06-540-002] 

Take notice that on February 28, 2007, High Island Offshore System, L.L.C. (HIOS) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to its filing, to become effective March 1, 2007. 

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-4345 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN RANDOLPH EPPS, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2227 DFL KJM P

vs.

KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On March 22, 2007, plaintiff filed a document in which he seeks the appointment

of counsel. This civil rights action was closed on December 12, 2006. Plaintiff is advised that

documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in

response to future filings. 

DATED: March 30, 2007. 

1

epps2227.58

Case 2:04-cv-02227-DFL -KJM Document 23 Filed 04/02/07 Page 1 of 1
No. 46746.

#### Protests 58860-K/12330, etc., of Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana (New Orleans).

*425Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of refinery gases. Following *Standard Oil Co.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 237, C. D. 471) the merchandise was held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1555 as claimed. '
EXHIBIT 21
                              IONICS, INCORPORATED

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                   State or Other Jurisdiction
          Name                                           of Incorporation

Aqua Design, Inc.*                                        California
Elite Chemicals Pty. Ltd.                                 Australia
Favourable Trading Ltd. (dba Ionics Ireland)              Ireland
Fidelity Purewater, Inc.                                  California
Fidelity Water Systems, Inc.                              California
Global Water Services, S.A.+                              Panama
Ionics Acapulco, S.A. de C.V.                             Mexico
Ionics Agar Environmental Ltd.                            Israel
Ionics Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.                             Singapore
Ionics (Bermuda) Ltd.*                                    Bermuda
Ionics Caribbean Investors Ltd.                           St. Lucia
Ionics Constructors Trinidad Ltd.                         Trinidad and Tobago
Ionics Foreign Sales Corporation Limited                  Jamaica
Ionics France S.A.                                        France
Ionics Freshwater Ltd.++                                  Barbados
Ionics Iberica, S.A.                                      Spain
Ionics Italba, S.p.A.+++                                  Italy
Ionics Korea, Inc.                                        Delaware
Ionics Life Sciences, Inc.                                New Jersey
Ionics Nederland B.V.                                     The Netherlands
Ionics Taiwan, Inc.                                       Taiwan
Ionics Ultrapure Water Corporation                        California
Ionics (U.K.) Limited++++                                 United Kingdom
Ionics Ventures Ltd.                                      United Kingdom
Ionics Water Resources Ltd.                               Israel
Ionics Watertec Pty. Ltd.                                 Australia
Kunshan Ionics Limited                                    China
Resources Conservation Co. International                  Delaware
Separation Technology, Inc.**                             Minnesota
Sievers Instruments, Inc.                                 Colorado
-----------------------
*    The  Registrant,  either  directly,  through  Aqua  Design,  Inc. or
     through   Ionics   (Bermuda)   Ltd.,   wholly  owns  10   corporations
     incorporated in various Caribbean jurisdictions which own and operate,
     or operate and maintain, desalination plants for the supply of potable
     water to resorts, hotels and municipalities.

**   Owns a U.K. subsidiary, SeparaTech Limited.

+    This entity is wholly owned by Ionics (U.K.) Ltd.

++   Registrant owns 50% of this entity.

+++  This entity owns a 75% interest in Agrinord S.r.l., an Italian
     corporation in the waste treatment business.

++++ This entity is wholly owned by Ionics Ventures Ltd.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________ _____________
No. 1D18-1895

________________ _____________
T ORAY A NTHONY R ICKETTS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

________________ _____________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Du val County. Russell Healey, Judge.

April 30, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , B ILBREY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur.

________________ _____________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fl a. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

________________ _____________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and David A. Henson, Assistant Public Defender, Talla hassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Genera l, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Before the Second Division,

April 7, 1949

No. 53006.

#### R. L. Swearer Company *v.*United States,

petition 6394-R (Pittsburgh).

*281Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It is contended that through inadvertence the entry was made in Canadian currency instead of in United States currency. Upon the record the court was satisfied that the entry of the merchandise at a less value than that returned upon final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the ease or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE RAINLINE CORPORATION, )

) CIV. S-04-2700 GEB DAD

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 

) ORDER

CENTRAL STRIPING SERVICE, INC., ) 

JAMES LESNIEWSKI, SUSAN LESNIEWSKI,)

)

Defendants. )

)

The typographical error on page 3, line 12 of the Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Order filed July 1, 2005, is amended to read

that “All discovery shall be completed by August 30, 2006.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 12, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02700-GEB-DAD Document 39 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 1
a a

34°N

a7. aaa

33°45'N

FP at

33°30'N

7°

33°15'N

so

a

.

z é.

ait otic) 5

fo ks

64°15'E

64°30°E

—_——_——<—_—=———-

>

(ABP oy Nee

i
ya

a . . 7

_ co ,-
oe a

+
ae =

: in io ~~
ce LA
al 7 + ae
Pal? A fe Sy
’ e ‘ ir a mr. y tos
“ . Meat 7 ie ~ 9’ L -

F,

ce

<a ~—s
“. .
—
, on 2

64°45'E

RAH
Lf;
“*y

, ae

/
’
z

EXPLANATION

— Road

—-— $tream, mostly intermittant
O City, town, or village
—- Province boundary

&

L_ |

Peak
Image quadrant or tile

65°E

—_ >
-
¢
. * f
«
¥ ‘ ai y
s
. «
» * . e

10 KILOMETE

[-——

0 5 MILES

65°15'E

\ yi ' J

65°30°E

4
f
“TM

.
-

4 ot * te fy
: i/j La A “a4
‘ — A 72 e a ¢
No. 49159.

#### Petition 6329-R of G. Klein & Son, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The question in this case is whether the foreign value or the United States -value should have been used for entering certain leather-bound prayer books. A test case was made and the petitioner filed an appeal to reappraisement, but because of the difficulty of obtaining proof he later abandoned it. On the record the court was satisfied that the undervaluation resulted from "an honest difference of opinion and that the record demonstrates there was at no time 'any intention to defraud the revenue, to conceal or misrepresent the facts, or to deceive the appraiser. The petition was therefore granted
No. 41807.

#### Protests 957001-G, etc., of A. & P. Packing Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 16400 the court dismissed the protests.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Terry Bennie, * From the 35 th District Court

of Brown County

Trial Court No. CV1 2 04119

.

Vs . No. 11

- 17

- 00094

- CV * August 3

, 2017

City of Bangs, Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., a nd Bailey, J.)

This court ha s considered Appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss this

appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in

accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The cost s incurred

by reason of this appeal are taxed against Terry Bennie

.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of CI Sell Cars, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Curtis
Hunsinger, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Curtis Hunsinger
--------------------------
Curtis Hunsinger
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

December 17, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Region III Regulatory Fairness Board and the SBA Office of the National Ombudsman will hold a National Regulatory Fairness Hearing on Friday, March 16, 2007, at 10 a.m. The forum will take place at the EPA East Building, Ceremonial Hearing Room, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 1153, Washington, DC 20460. The purpose of the meeting is for Business Organizations, Trade Associations, Chambers of Commerce and related organizations serving small business concerns to report experiences regarding unfair or excessive Federal regulatory enforcement issues affecting their members. 

                    For further information, please contact Martin Gold. Martin Gold, SBA, Deputy National Ombudsman, 409 3rd Street, Suite 7125, Washington, DC 20416, phone (202) 205-7549 and fax (202) 401-4432, e-mail:                     *Martin.gold@sba.gov.*

                    For more information, see our Web site at                     *http://www.sba.gov/​ombudsman.*

Matthew Teague, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-4378 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Report Request ID: 1011502 Report Code: AMP430 Aug. 10, 2012

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: YGX

State County City Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

06

06

095

097

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

88101

SELECTED OPTIONS

OZONE EVALUATION

AGENCY ROLE

MERGE PDF FILES

Option Type Option Value

SEASONAL-HOURLY

REPORTING

YES

SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Order Column

EPA_REGION

STATE_CODE

MONITOR_TYPE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

PARAMETER_CODE

POC

GLOBAL DATES

2010

Start Date End Date

01 12 2010

Tribal

Code
Aug. 10, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 1 of 3

MONITORS NOT REPORTING 
Aug. 10, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 2 of 3

DATE RANGE: 

REGION: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

California MONITOR TYPE: 

Bay Area Air Quality Management District

SLAMS

JAN. 01, 2010 THRU DEC. 31, 2010

SITE ID

CITY

ADDRESS

PARAMETER POC DURATION

METHOD

------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS -------------------------------

NUMBER / PERCENT

06-095-0004

06-097-0003

88101

88101

PM2.5 - Local Conditions

PM2.5 - Local Conditions

1

3

7

1

Vallejo

Santa Rosa

304 TUOLUMNE ST., VALLEJO

837 5TH ST., SANTA ROSA

145

170

18

732

 58%

 98%

27

667

 96%

 99%

30

718

 97%

 97%

5

714

 100%

 99%

3

729

 60%

 98%

5

713

 100%

 99%

6

734

 100%

 99%

5

740

 100%

 99%

5

700

 100%

 97%

27

737

 87%

 99%

22

708

 73%

 98%

31

740

 100%

 99%

184

8632

 86%

 99%

MONITORS REPORTING 

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR

STATE:

REP ORG:
Aug. 10, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 3 of 3

DATE RANGE: 

REGION: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

California

MONITOR TYPE: 

Bay Area Air Quality Management District

SLAMS

JAN. 01, 2010 THRU DEC. 31, 2010

PARAMETER ACTIVE MONITORS # NOT REPORTING # MONITORS > 75% MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS

88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions 2 0 2 92.5%

2 0 2 92.5%

2 0 2 92.5%

2 0 2 92.5%

2 0 2 92.5%

2 0 2 92.5%

Bay Area Air Quality Management District

California

REGION SUMMARY: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

REPORT SUMMARY: 

MT SUMMARY: SLAMS

REPORT SUMMARY

STATE:

STATE SUMMARY: 

REP ORG:

RO SUMMARY:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 In light of the Court's Order Re: Settlement and 1

Disposition, the August 28, 2006 Final Pretrial Conference and

the October 25, 2006 Jury Trial are vacated. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF

NEW YORK,

Plaintiff,

v.

FOOD SERVICE INSURANCE

MANAGERS, DWIGHT HALVORSON

INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., and

DWIGHT HALVORSON, 

Defendants.

______________________________/

No. 2:04-cv-1166-MCE-GGH

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND

DISPOSITION

Pursuant to the representations of the attorney for

Plaintiff, the Court has determined that this case is settled.1

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160,

dispositional documents are to be filed on or before September 8,

2006.

///

///

//

Case 2:04-cv-01166-MCE -GGH Document 57 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the

imposition of sanctions on any and all counsel as well as any

party or parties who cause non-compliance with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 23, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01166-MCE -GGH Document 57 Filed 08/24/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

December 29, 1941

No. 46748.

#### Petition 6226-R of G. R. Kirk Co. (Pembina).

Opinion by First Division. This petition was dismissed by consent without prejudice.