alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of App eals

San Antonio, Texas

May 4, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00137

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.A.P., JR. ET AL. CHILDREN

,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015PA02543 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On May 3, 2017, appellant’s brief was filed. The brief violates Rule 9.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because the order of termination contained in the appendix to the

brief does not redact the minor’s names. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.8( b ). It is therefore ORDERED

that the brief filed by the appellant is STRICKEN from our record. It is FURTHER ORDERED

that appellant file an amended brief containing a redacted order in the appendix no later than ten days from the date of this order. Because appellee has been served with a copy of the brief, th is order does not affect the May 23, 2017 deadline for the filing of the appellee’s brief.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of th e said

court on this 4th day of May, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6280

JOAN E. MARCOTT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; VIC LOY, Warden Alderson Camp; DONALD

CRUMP, Case Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District

Judge. (CA-94-271-1)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 31, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joan E. Marcott, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States

Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Marcott v. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-94-271-1 (S.D.W. Va.

Jan. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Anmore,
Inc. for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2004, I, Giorgio Saumat, Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Anmore, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such quarterly report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
          31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended March 31, 2004, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ANMORE,
          INC.


Dated:    May 19, 2004

ANMORE, INC.


By:  /s/ Giorgio Saumat
-----------------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7286
ELTON E. COLEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICKY HARRISON, Warden, Manning Correctional Institution, in his individual and/or official capacity, Defendant - Appellee, and PARKER EVATT, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections, in his individual and/or official capacity; L ARRY C. BATSON, General Counsel, South Carolina Department of Corrections, in his individual and/or official capacity, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-2571-6-20AK) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.23 Elton E. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Ronald Stanley, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting a directed verdict in favor of the Defendant in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action. We have reviewed the record and the transcript ofthe district court's decision and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coleman v. Harrison , No. CA-93-2571-6-20AK (D.S.C. July 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V,
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Kimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  /s/ Kimberly A.
      Springsteen-AbbottKimberly
      A. Springsteen-AbbottChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      14, 2008
Exhibit 99.4

               STATEMENT UNDER OATH OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
       REGARDING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS

I, Dennis M. O'Connor, state and attest that:

(1)  To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the covered reports of
     M.B.A. Holdings, Inc., and, except as corrected or supplemented in a
     subsequent covered report:

     *    no covered report contained an untrue statement of a material fact as
          of the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
          report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as of the date on
          which it was filed); and

     *    no covered report omitted to state a material fact necessary to make
          the statements in the covered report, in light of the circumstances
          under which they were made, not misleading as of the end of the period
          covered by such report (or in the case of a report on Form 8-K or
          definitive proxy materials, as of the date on which it was filed).

(2)  I have reviewed the contents of this statement with the Company's Audit
     Committee.

(3)  In this statement under oath, each of the following,  if filed on or before
     the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

     *    Annual Report on Form 10-K of M.B.A. Holdings, Inc. for the year ended
          October 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
          File Number 1-9183,

     *    all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all definitive
          proxy materials of M.B.A. Holdings, Inc. filed with the Commission
          subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K identified above; and

     *    any amendments to any of the foregoing.

By: /s/ Dennis M. O'Connor
    -------------------------------
    Dennis M. O'Connor
    January 22, 2003

                                       Subscribed and sworn to before me
                                       This 22nd day of January 2003.

                                       /s/ Shelly Beesley
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Notary Public
                                       My Commission Expires: September 30, 2003
ex10-8.htm


Exhibit 10.8

 

 

AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This is an Amendment (the “Amendment”), dated March 12, 2015, to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of October 25, 2007, as amended (the “Agreement”), by and between MeetMe, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and John Abbott (the “Employee”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to continue to retain Employee’s services as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”). 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the obligations and covenants herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Employee hereby agree as follows: 

 

1.      On March 11, 2015, the parties entered into an amendment of the Agreement (the “March 11 Amendment”) that related to the subject matter hereof.  The March 11 Amendment is hereby terminated and replaced in its entirety with this Amendment.

 

2.      The Agreement is hereby amended as follows: The last sentence of Section 7b(ii) is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: 

 

In addition, Employee will have the right to exercise all such options for a period of two (2) years following the date upon which Employee ceases to be Chairman of the Board, provided, however, that the Employee may not exercise any option after its expiration date, even if said expiration date occurs prior to the termination of the aforementioned two (2) year period.

 

3.           The Company hereby represents that it has the authority to enter into this Amendment and has received all required approvals including approval of the Company’s Compensation Committee. 

 

4.           In the event of any conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms as contained in this Amendment shall control. In all other respects the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed.

 

5.           This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be one and the same agreement. Facsimile signatures shall be treated in all respects and for all purposes as originals.

 

6.           In all other respects, the Agreement and all Stock Option Agreements with the Employee are ratified and conformed between the Company and the Employee shall be amended in the same manner as the Agreement.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

 

	
 
	
MEETME, INC. 

 

 

__________________________

Frederic Beckley 

General Counsel & EVP Business Affairs 

 

 

__________________________

JOHN ABBOTT
2013-12-20 11:54 FAA 8172225092 » 2024935142 p 1 

To: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Company: Federal Aviation Administration 

Ti3lllphane: 

Fax; 2:02.493.5142 

Fr{.mt: Annjanat Chennauft, 

Till«: Agency Attorney 

Withdrawal of Complaint 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Southwot Region 

CJffle& o:f R~Uitmlll Counsel 

Fcul Worth, Texas 7i}1S7 

pgrck!ll!!.li!!Coyr!q,r ArWrptHi 

2601 Maat:IJl>M Boulevard 

f£lltWotih, Tuxas 76137 

In the Matter of: Mesa A!rllnes, Inc.- FAA lJock.et. No&, 2013-0721, 2013-0722, 

2013-0846, and 20"13-0047. 

Plew§e Note: 'This masmage !11 Intended anlyfOJ' the use of the i.ndlvh:lual or ent!ly to 

which it i& addressed and may contain information !hal is privileged, confidential. and 

exempt from dlscro.sure undar applicable law,'' 
2013-12-20 11:56 

In the Matter of; 

FAA 8172225092 » 2024935142 p 4/9 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

• 

'it: 

WASHINGTON, D.C . 

FAA Docllat No, 20'13{1722 

FAA Case No. 20:11SW07003S 

AL,J ~ Nat Yet Assigned 

WITHDRAWAl OF COMPLAINT 

Ttm Federal Avlatk.Jn AdmlnlstraUon (FAA}, in accordanca with Sec!lon Kt215 of the 

Rules of Praclice In FAA Civil Penally Actions, hereby withdraws tt.s complaint T~1is 

complaint is withdrawn because the pat1!os haw reached a aetllament of the case and a 

hearing is no longer required. Dated this 20illday ofOar:embar 201~t 

ERIC E. ANDERSON 

Regional Co~nsel 

Soulhwes~~~ion 0 

By: .· ~- ) . fA-.~c:~ ............. · nnjenet Chennault 

l{.tomey 

(8'17} :222-5071 
2013-12-20 11:57 FAA 8172225092 » 2024935142 p 5/9 

CERTIFiCATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby cartlfy that the original and one ropy of the foregoing Withdrawal of Complaint has 

bean maitoo December 20, 2013, by ('.ertifiad Mail- Re!um Receipt Requested and fax to: 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Adtninlstratlon 

800 lndepandenooAvanua, S.W •. 

Wallhfngton, D.C. 20591 

Attn; Ha<J.rlng Docket Cltrk, AGC430 

Wilbur Wright 8ui!dfng--8u~a 2W1000 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregC~ing Withdrawal of Complaint has been mailed 

December 20, 20"13, by C.erttfted Mail-Return Receipt Requested, to the fotrow!ng: 

Brian G!liman, Vice-President and Genera! Counsel 

Mesa Alr Gmup 

410 North 44th Street, Suite 700 

Phoenix, Al 85008 

Chrl!stoph~r Pappaioanou 

Director, Legal Affairs 

Mesa Air Group 

410 North 44th Street, Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRADY ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-2136-GEB-PAN-P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner, without counsel, prosecuting

this civil rights action in forma pauperis. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 6, 2005, the magistrate judge filed

findings and recommendations herein which were served on all

parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed

within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the

findings and recommendations.

Case 2:04-cv-02136-GEB-EFB Document 46 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 6,

2005, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s Due Process and Fourth Amendment claims

against Garcia, Jimenez, and Pontarol are dismissed with

prejudice;

3. Plaintiff’s access to courts claim against Garcia,

Jimenez, and Pontarol is dismissed without prejudice; and

4. Claims against Levin, Correa, Sands, Barton,

Watkins, Roche, and Rohlfing are dismissed without prejudice.

Dated: September 26, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02136-GEB-EFB Document 46 Filed 09/27/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 60864.

#### Pomerantz Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 262655-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pepper mills similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59626, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 

# CERTIFICATE OFEXEMPTION

By 

### authority ofSedion 68-201-115 

### Tennessee Code Annotated The Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board Declares 

# Memphis and Shelby County Tennessee and aU Included Municipalities

is exempt from theprovisions ofthe Tennessee Air Quality Act as found in Chapter 101 ofTitle 68, Tennessee Code Annotated subject to such limitations as established by the board pursuant to Board Order No. tl-004 passed by the Board on this the 13" day ofJune2012


## Air Pollution Control Board Members ofthe State ofTennessee
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF TIPPINGPOINT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350



In connection with the Annual Report of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  |                                       
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: June 3, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    KIP MCCLANAHAN
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | Kip McClanahan Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | /s/    ADAM CHIBIB                    
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  |                                       
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | Adam Chibib Chief Financial Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4459 

To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify 

those classes of individuals born in the United States who are not 

nationals or citizens of the United States at birth. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2024 

Mr. COTTON (for himself, Mr. VANCE, Mrs. BLACKBURN, and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act to clarify those classes of individuals born in the 

United States who are not nationals or citizens of the 

United States at birth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Constitutional Citizen5 ship Clarification Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

7 It is the sense of Congress that— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4459 IS

1 (1) the right of birthright citizenship, estab2 lished by section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the 

3 Constitution of the United States, is rooted in the 

4 common law doctrine of jus soli and limited by the 

5 principle that it is not ‘‘the soil, but ligeantia and 

6 obedientia that make the subject born’’ a citizen; 

7 (2) the Supreme Court of the United States has 

8 long recognized that, under the principle of alle9 giance and obedience, the children of foreign dip10 lomats or enemy troops born on United States soil 

11 are not entitled to birthright citizenship; and 

12 (3) under that same principle, the children of 

13 foreign spies, saboteurs, terrorists, or other hostile 

14 actors, as well as the children of illegal aliens, 

15 should not be entitled to birthright citizenship. 

16 SEC. 3. PURPOSE. 

17 The purposes of this Act are— 

18 (1) to codify the common law exception to 

19 birthright citizenship for ambassadors and invaders; 

20 and 

21 (2) to clarify that other categories of disloyal or 

22 disobedient aliens are also subject to such exception. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4459 IS

1 SEC. 4. CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH EXCLUSIONS FOR CERTAIN 

2 PERSONS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES. 

3 Section 301(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act (8 U.S.C. 1401(a)) is amended by striking the semi5 colon at the end and inserting the following: ‘‘: Provided, 

6 That a person born in the United States shall not be con7 sidered subject to the jurisdiction of the United States if 

8 the person is born of alien parents who are— 

9 (1) unlawfully present in the United States; 

10 (2) present in the United States for diplomatic 

11 purposes; or 

12 (3) engaged in a hostile occupation of, or a hos13 tile operation in, the United States;’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stefan A. Bird,  President of CE Generation,  LLC (the  "Company"),  certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company  for the annual  period
          ended  December  31,  2003  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated:  February 27, 2004


                               /s/ Stefan A. Bird
                               ------------------
                                 Stefan A. Bird
                                    President
                            (chief executive officer)