### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013

NO. 03-12-00635-CV

Jasper Canady England, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRI CT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this C ourt that there was no error in the trial court’s

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered th at the trial court’s order is in

all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to co sts is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013

NO. 03-12-00636-CV

Jasper Canady England, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRI CT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this C ourt that there was no error in the trial court’s

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered th at the trial court’s order is in

all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to co sts is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013

NO. 03-12-00637-CV

Jasper Canady England, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRI CT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this C ourt that there was no error in the trial court’s

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered th at the trial court’s order is in

all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to co sts is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013

NO. 03-12-00638-CV

Jasper Canady England, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRI CT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this C ourt that there was no error in the trial court’s

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered th at the trial court’s order is in

all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to co sts is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013

NO. 03-12-00639-CV

Jasper Canady England, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRI CT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this C ourt that there was no error in the trial court’s

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered th at the trial court’s order is in

all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to co sts is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013

NO. 03-12-00640-CV

Jasper Canady England, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRI CT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this C ourt that there was no error in the trial court’s

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered th at the trial court’s order is in

all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to co sts is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013

NO. 03-12-00641-CV

Jasper Canady England, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRI CT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this C ourt that there was no error in the trial court’s

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered th at the trial court’s order is in

all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to co sts is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013

NO. 03-12-00642-CV

Jasper Canady England, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRI CT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this C ourt that there was no error in the trial court’s

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered th at the trial court’s order is in

all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to co sts is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013

NO. 03-12-00643-CV

Jasper Canady England, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRI CT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this C ourt that there was no error in the trial court’s

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered th at the trial court’s order is in

all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to co sts is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.