alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter  Ended  November 30, 2008 (the  "Report") by
Advanced Media Training, Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.



February 18, 2009                       By:  /S/ ROBERT STEVENS
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Robert Stevens
                                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                             Financial Officer
#### David R. Wallace et al., Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Jonathan A. Wallace, Deceased, Respondents, v Katherine J. Pacelli et al., Appellants.

[633 NYS2d 241]

—Yesawich Jr., J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), entered October 18, 1994 in Schenectady County, which denied defendants’ motion to amend their answer to add a counterclaim.

Decedent, Jonathan A. Wallace, three years of age, was fatally injured when struck by defendants’ automobile. When the accident occurred the infant was chasing a ball into the cul-de-sac by his home. Plaintiffs, decedent’s parents, who were in the immediate vicinity at the time of the accident, commenced this action for their son’s wrongful death and for the pain and suffering endured by plaintiff Laurie J. Wallace, decedent’s mother, who assertedly was in the zone of danger. Defendants moved to amend their answer to add a counterclaim *charging*that plaintiffs’ negligence was the primary cause of the accident; their claimed negligence is that they did not keep decedent from playing in the street. Defendants appeal the denial of their motion. We affirm.

*779The gravamen of the counterclaim is negligent parental supervision of a child, which is not actionable (see, *Holodook v Spencer,*36 NY2d 35, 48; *Hlavinka v Slovak Sky Bungalow Colony,*203 AD2d 855). Defendants’ contrary view notwithstanding, a breach of no duty, apart from that stemming from the family relationship, has been alleged *(see, Barocas v Woolworth Co.,*207 AD2d 145; *Walden v Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst,*116 AD2d 963).

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.2

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Keane, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-00175, 33-16187, 33-00176, 2-76657,
2-91931, 33-16188, 33-38361, 2-40012, 2-87193, 2-61721, 2-89418, 33-38360,
33-38361, 33-52760, 33-52758, 33-52756, 33-52762, 333-16113, 333-56119 and
333-62759) and Form S-3 and S-3/A (File Nos. 333-46329, 333-56733, 333-61741 and
333-66937) of our report dated February 26, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Keane, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 , and
for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 2000
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayne Scott, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 957]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J., at hearing; Bernard Fried, J., at trial and sentence), rendered November 10, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, and judgment, same court (Howard Bell, J.), rendered July 22, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years to run concurrently with the above sentence, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly denied defendant’s request to charge criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree as a lesser included offense of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree since, based on the evidence developed at trial, the jury could not have rationally concluded that defendant possessed the drugs without intent to sell *(People v Hernandez*215 AD2d 179). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SF #1077095 v1 -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

A L

ROBERT P. BIEGLER, State Bar No. 88506 

BIEGLER, ORTIZ & CHAN LLP 

1107 9th Street, Suite 1025 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 444-3971 

Facsimile: (916) 444-3975 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ANDREW CARLETON 

ROBERT A. DOLINKO, State Bar No. 076256 

CHRIS BAKER, State Bar No. 181557 

DEBORAH R. SCHWARTZ, State Bar No. 208934 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 371-1200 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THOMSON FINANCIAL INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANDREW CARELTON, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

THOMSON FINANCIAL CO., INC., THE 

THOMSON CORPORATION, a Corporation, 

and DOES 1-5, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No.: CIV S-04-2539 DFL GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, 

through their undersigned counsel, that this action is dismissed with prejudice; each party shall 

bear its or his own costs and attorneys fees; and 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:04-cv-02539-DFL-GGH Document 31 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SF #1077095 v1 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

A L

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Court will retain jurisdiction 

only to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement should that become necessary.

Dated: July 10, 2006 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

By /s/ Robert A. Dolinko, Esquire

Robert A. Dolinko 

Deborah R. Schwartz 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THOMSON FINANCIAL INC. 

Dated: July 10, 2006 

BIEGLER ORTIZ & CHAN LLP 

By /s/ Robert P. Biegler, Esquire

Robert P. Biegler 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ANDREW CARLETON 

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation, 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 18, 2006 /s/ David F. Levi________

United States District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-02539-DFL-GGH Document 31 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

# * *

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of CHAAS Acquisitions, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terence C. Seikel, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ TERENCE C. SEIKEL                 |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Terence C. Seikel                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |
| November 12, 2004                     |

 

1

----
No. 44998.

#### Protest 770598-G of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) squawker balloons in part of bamboo at 45 percent under paragraph 409, Abstract 40493 followed; (2) trick daggers like those involved in Abstract' 37637 at 45 percent under paragraph 397; and (3) novelties in chief value of fur at 50 percent under paragraph 1519 (e), Abstract 41823 followed.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Grant Thornton LLP**

We have issued ourreports dated March 7, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OpenTVCorp. for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of OpenTV Corp. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-145720, No. 333-130560, No. 333-115373,No. 333-74026, No. 333-52180, No. 333-42892, No. 333-37196, and No. 333-102944) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-115374). 

/s/    GRANT THORNTON LLP 

San Francisco, California 

March 7, 2008
No. 58047.

protests 134772-K, etc. (Seattle).

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of the merchandise marked “A,” parts of internal-combustion engines, imported separately, or marked “B,” internal-combustion engines, imported with power saws, are the same in all material respects as the articles involved in *Geo. S. Bush*& *Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(41 C. C. P. A. 33, C. A. D. 525), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Further, in accordance with said stipulation, it was held that the value of said items marked “A” is the appraised value and that the value of said items marked “B” is the percentage of the appraised value of said power saws, as noted in green ink on the invoices by the examiner.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Thomas Wisniewski, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 912 C.D. 2021

:

James F. Frommer, Jr., D.O.; :

Andrew J. Dancha, D.O.; :

Correct Care Solutions, LLC; :

Deborah Cutshall; William Dreibelbis, :

R.N.; Paul A. Noel, M.D.; Eugene H. :

Ginchereau, M.D.; Kathy Montag; :

Jodie White; An drea Norris, R.N.; :

Joseph J. Silva, R.N.; Christopher :

Oppman; Pennsylvania Department of :

Corrections :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, April 11 , 2023

, having considered A ppellant ’ s application for

reargument, the application is DENIED

.
No. 54076.

#### Stoffel & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 20984-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Egbert Campbell, Appellant, v Records Access Officer of New York City Police Department et al., Respondents.

[633 NYS2d 174]

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered August 3, 1993, which, upon petitioner’s failure to appear on the return date, denied his *pro se*application pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

A party may not appeal directly from an order entered upon his or her default, the proper remedy being a motion to open the default and an appeal from any denial thereof *(Furci v Furci,*45 AD2d 1003). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Tom, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statement  on  Form S-8's (Nos. 333-43448 and 333-53780) and S-3 (No. 333-69612)
of  Evolve  Software,  Inc.  of our report dated July 30, 2001, except as to the
subsequent  events  described  in  Note  19  which  is as of September 27, 2001,
relating  to  the consolidated financial statements and financial schedule which
appears  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K/A.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, CA
October 25, 2001


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel Sheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Date: April 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Samuel ShengSamuel Sheng

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1687-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1687-DR), dated March 3, 2007, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         March 6, 2007.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the Public Assistance program and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program for the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of March 3, 2007: 

Dale, Dallas, Henry, Montgomery, and Wilcox Counties for Individual Assistance. 

Coffee County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance). 

Henry and Wilcox Counties for Public Assistance. 

All counties within the State of Alabama are eligible to apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison, 

Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management and Director of FEMA.

[FR Doc. E7-4431 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
# C_2007256EN.01003101.xml

| 27.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/31

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on rear-view mirrors for wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (Codified version)’

COM(2007) 236 final — 2007/0081 (COD)

(2007/C 256/06)

On 29 May 2007 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 95 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 437th plenary session of 11 and 12 July 2007 (meeting of 11 July), by 145 votes to two and four abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 11 July 2007.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL DAVID WHITE, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2276 GEB GGH P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On July 13, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion for discovery. Plaintiff does not claim

that defendants have failed to participate in the discovery process. Rather, plaintiff seeks a court

order directing defendants to respond to his discovery requests.

Plaintiff is informed that court permission is not necessary for discovery requests

and that neither discovery requests served on an opposing party nor that party's responses should

be filed until such time as a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the

court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties

shall not be filed with the court unless, and until, they are at issue. Accordingly, plaintiff’s

motion for discovery is disregarded.

On July 13, 2005, plaintiff also filed a motion for a pretrial conference. Pending

before the court is defendants’ May 19, 2005, motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust

Case 2:04-cv-02276-GEB-GGH Document 37 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

administrative remedies and for failure to state a claim. At this point in the litigation, a pretrial

conference is premature. Accordingly, plaintiff’s July 13, 2005, motion for a pretrial conference

is denied.

On July 13, 2005, plaintiff also filed a motion for summary judgment. Because

defendants’ motion to dismiss, as described above, is pending, plaintiff’s summary judgment

motion is premature as well. Accordingly, the court will vacate plaintiff’s motion and will

renotice it following resolution of defendants’ motion, if appropriate.

On July 29, 2005, defendants filed a request for extension of time to respond to

plaintiff’s summary judgment motion. Because plaintiff’s motion is vacated, defendants’ request

for extension of time is denied as unnecessary.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s July 13, 2005, motion for discovery is disregarded;

2. Plaintiff’s July 13, 2005, motion for a pretrial conference is denied;

3. Plaintiff’s July 13, 2005, summary judgment motion is vacated without

prejudice to its renewal at a later time;

4. Defendants’ July 29, 2005, request for extension of time is denied as

unnecessary.

DATED: 8/16/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:kj

whi2276.dis

Case 2:04-cv-02276-GEB-GGH Document 37 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Request for Dismissal and Order Thereon Jones v. A-1 Mart, et al.

 CIV. S-04-1991 DFL KJM

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

EDWARD BRENNER, SBN 91315

LAW OFFICES OF EDWARD R. BRENNER

2180 Harvard Street, Suite 560

Sacramento, CA 95815

Telephone: (916) 925-3113

Facsimile: (916) 921-0247

Attorneys for Defendant

ROGER HAHN, SBN 53677

LAW OFFICES OF ROGER HAHN

430 Third Street

Woodland, CA 95695

Telephone: (530) 662-1082

Facsimile: (530) 662-3018

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GYPSIE JONES, 

Plaintiff,

v.

GURMUKH GOSAL dba A-1 MART;

DENNIS QUON & LUCINDA QUON,

Trustees of the QUON FAMILY TRUST; and

DOES 1 through 10,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV. S 04-1991 DFL KJM

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND

ORDER THEREON 

Case 2:04-cv-01991-DFL -KJM Document 14 Filed 08/11/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Request for Dismissal and Order Thereon Jones v. A-1 Mart, et al.

- 2 - CIV. S-04-1991 DFL KJM

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES:

Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement and Release between plaintiff, GYPSIE

JONES, and defendants, GURMUKH GOSAL and DENNIS QUON & LUCINDA QUON,

Trustees of the QUON FAMILY TRUST, the parties hereby request that all parties be

dismissed with prejudice from the above-entitled action.

Dated: August 9, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

_/s/ Scott Hubbard, IV 

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD, IV 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Gypsie Jones

Dated: August 9, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF EDWARD R. BRENNER

__ signature on file 

EDWARD BRENNER

Attorneys for Defendant Dennis Quon and

Lucinda Quon, Trustees of the Quon Family

Trust

Dated: August 9, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF ROGER HAHN

 signature on file 

ROGER HAHN

Attorneys for Defendant Gurmukh Gosal

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S-04-

1991 DFL KJM, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: August 10, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

For Honorable David F. Levi

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01991-DFL -KJM Document 14 Filed 08/11/05 Page 2 of 2