alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4418]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[UT-910-07-1120-PH-24-1A]


Notice of Utah Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Department of Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Utah Resource Advisory Council (RAC) Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and The Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) Utah 
Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The Utah Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet May 1-2, 
2007.

ADDRESSES: On May 1, the RAC will meet at 10 a.m. at the Price Field 
Office of the BLM, 125 South 600 West, Price, Utah, for a field tour. 
On May 2, from 8 a.m. until 2 p.m., the RAC will be meeting at the 
Emery County Courthouse, 75 East Main, Castle Dale.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Sherry Foot, Special Programs 
Coordinator,Utah State Office, Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 
45155, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84145-0155; phone (801) 539-4195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 1, the Utah BLM Resource Advisory 
Council will meet for a field tour of Nine Mile Canyon. Nine Mile 
Canyon was nominated as a National Register of Historic Places-
Archaeologist District. Presentations on the history of the nomination, 
its resources and characteristics will be given. On May 2, the RAC will 
be given presentations from the Field Offices on recreation site fee 
proposals, an overview of Utah BLM issues, and an update on the Factory 
Butte temporary restriction order. A public comment period, where 
members of the public may address the RAC, is scheduled from 12:45 
p.m.-1:15 p.m. Written comments may be sent to the Bureau of Land 
Management address listed above. All meetings are open to the public; 
however, transportation, lodging, and meals are the responsibility of 
the participating public.

    Dated: March 6, 2007.
Selma Sierra,
State Director.
 [FR Doc. E7-4418 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
No. 50091.

#### Protests 100640-K, etc., of R. L. Albert & Son, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```
Deaf Education: Improved Oversight Needed for National Technical
Institute for the Deaf (Letter Report, 12/16/93, GAO/HRD-94-23).

In 1965, Congress passed legislation creating the National Technical
Institute for the Deaf (NTID), a postsecondary institution intended to
train and educate deaf persons for successful employment.  The Rochester
Institute of Technology (RIT) in upstate New York subsequently agreed to
host NTID.  The Education Department assumed responsibility in fiscal
year 1980 for administering the agreement with RIT and for overseeing
NTID.  GAO found that NTID has done a poor job of accounting for how it
has spent federal funds, has inappropriately carried over federal funds
from one year to the next, and may have used federal funds improperly.
Although NTID is not under the same restrictions that federal agencies
and grantees must abide by when using federal funds, some NTID
expenditures did not directly relate to NTID operations. Education
Department and NTID officials believe that NTID's dependence on federal
dollars will continue at its present level of 83 percent of total
revenues despite program changes that have occurred.  Review of NTID has
been minimal.

--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------

 REPORTNUM:  HRD-94-23
     TITLE:  Deaf Education: Improved Oversight Needed for National 
             Technical Institute for the Deaf
      DATE:  12/16/93
   SUBJECT:  Educational programs
             Aid for education
             Handicapped persons
             Education or training
             Higher education
             Special education
             Federal funds
             Accounting procedures
             Federal fund accounts
             Budget outlays
IDENTIFIER:  National Technical Institute for the Deaf Strategic Plan
             
************************************************************************

We regret that the full text of this item is presently unavailable.

See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or 
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: [email protected]
```
**32.1
      SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V,
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Kimberly A. Springsteen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Kimberly
                A. SpringsteenKimberly
                A. SpringsteenChief
                Executive OfficerAugust
                14, 2007
Exhibit 12.2
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: December 18, 2009
    
    /s/ Lai Ni QuiaqueName:
    
    Lai Ni QuiaqueTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
No. 57320.

protest 192736-K (San Francisco).

#### The American Import Co. *v.*United States,

*452Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56902, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 21, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-20963 Summary Calendar

_____________________ KEN FLORY, Derivatively on behalf of Dynacq International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus CHIU MOON CHAN; PHILIP S. CHAN; STEPHEN L. HUBER; EARL R. VOTAW; DYNACQ INTERNATIONAL, INC. a Nevada Corporation, Defendant-Appellees.

__________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CV-3123

__________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is affirmed. The appellant raises no objection to the reasons for that judgment and only maintains that he was denied an opportunity to amend his pleadings and that appellee argued res judicata in a supplemental presentation to the court in support of its original motion to2

dismiss. Appellant filed no motion to amend during the months it could have done so and after having only stated in response to the motion to dismiss that he intended to amend. The res judicata issue was properly presented to the court and appellant suggests no prejudice. AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-50435

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

STEPHEN DOUGLAS JULIAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:03-CR-252-1

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stephen Douglas Julian, federal prisoner # 35886-180, seeks leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s denial of his 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence based on amendment 782. 

By moving to proceed IFP, Julian is challenging the district court’s certification 

that his appeal was not taken in good faith because it is frivolous. See Baugh 

v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 13, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-50435 Document: 00513341525 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2016
No. 15-50435

2

A sentencing court is under no obligation at all to reduce a sentence 

under § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Evans, 587 F.3d 667, 673 (5th Cir. 2009). 

The district court’s decision whether to grant such a motion is reviewed only 

for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Henderson, 636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th 

Cir. 2011). If the record shows that the district court gave due consideration 

to the motion as a whole and at least implicitly considered the 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) factors, then there is no abuse of discretion. United States v. 

Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1010 (5th Cir. 1995); see also Evans, 587 F.3d at 673. 

Review of the record in light of pertinent authority shows no abuse of 

discretion in the district court’s disposition of Julian’s § 3582(c)(2) motion. 

Although Julian was eligible for a reduction, the district court was not required 

to give him one. See Evans, 587 F.3d at 673. The district court explicitly noted 

that it took the § 3553(a) factors into account when considering the motion. 

Additionally, it noted his prior offenses and that he manufactured 

methamphetamine in proximity to a small child and pregnant woman. These 

facts go to the § 3553(a)(1) concerns of “the nature and circumstances of the 

offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant.” Consequently, 

the district court acted properly by taking them into consideration. See 

Whitebird, 55 F.3d at 1010. When considered as a whole, the record shows that 

the district court thoughtfully deliberated upon the motion before denying it 

and thus did not abuse its discretion. See id.

Julian has failed to show that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on 

appeal. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, 

his IFP motion is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-50435 Document: 00513341525 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2016
# EUR-Lex - 52007BP0127(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007BP0127(01)

**1. European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Network and Information Security Agency for the financial year 2005 (C6-0401/2006 - 2006/2168(DEC)) **

*
Official Journal 074 E , 20/03/2008 P. 0267 - 0268 *

1.

European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Network and Information Security Agency for the financial year 2005 (C6-0401/2006 — 2006/2168(DEC))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Network and Information Security Agency for the financial year 2005 [1],

- having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the final annual accounts of the European Network and Information Security Agency for the financial year 2005, together with the Agency's replies [2],

- having regard to the Council's recommendation of 27 February 2007 (5711/2007 — C6-0080/2007),

- having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 276 thereof,

- having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [3], and in particular Article 185 thereof,

- having regard to Regulation (EC) No 460/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 establishing a European Network and Information Security Agency [4], and in particular Article 17 thereof,

- having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [5], and in particular Article 94 thereof,

- having regard to Rule 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A6-0102/2007),

1. Grants the director of the European Network and Information Security Agency Discharge for the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2005;

2. Sets out its observations in the resolution below;

3. Instructs its President to forward this decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the director of the European Network and Information Security Agency, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

[1] OJ C 266, 31.10.2006, p. 16.

[2] OJ C 312, 19.12.2006, p. 1.

[3] OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

[4] OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 1.

[5] OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

(Section 302 Certification)

I, Beth Sanders, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of 1st Centennial Bancorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in the annual report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves Management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 22, 2006



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    BETH SANDERS                                               
|Beth Sanders, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/15

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.56 N 76.20 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■

■ ■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

● ●

●

●
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN HARDNEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1897 LKK GGH P

vs.

TOM CAREY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 5, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections

to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-01897-LKK -GGH Document 49 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 5, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants’ November 10, 2005, motion to dismiss is granted.

DATED: September 11, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-01897-LKK -GGH Document 49 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent, No. CR S-04-1911 LKK KJM P

vs.

RAM KISHAN SAINI, 

Movant. ORDER

 /

On May 11, 2005, the parties filed a stipulation indicating this matter should be

dismissed without prejudice. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter

is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed R. Civ. P. 41(a). 

DATED: May 12, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

sain1911.stip

Case 2:04-cv-01911-LKK -KJM Document 8 Filed 05/12/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 46155.

#### Protests 952687-G, etc., of Marine Products Co. et al. (San Diego, etc.).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# Record of Contacts **FDMS Docket No. FAA** **- 20**  **12 -**  **0109 Contacts.**  With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response Bom bardier Aerospace Jake Levesque

(514) 855 - 5001 x56633 9/16/2010 No objec tions Bom bardier Aerospace Francisco Doyon

(514) 855 - 5001 x59571 9/16/2010 No objections TCCA Derek Ferguson

(613) 952 - 4356 9/28/2010 No objections
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

James P. DeFazio,

Plaintiff(s),

vs. CIV-S-04-1358-LKK/GGH 

HOLLISTER, INC., et al.,

Defendant(s). 

______________________________________/

 Plaintiff filed a discovery motion on September 8, 2006 set for hearing 

October 5, 2006 @ 10:00 a.m.. Notwithstanding the three days specified by E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-

251 the joint statement shall be filed in no later than five court days before the scheduled

hearing. Notwithstanding E.D. Cal. L.R. 5-133(f), if the joint statement is more than 25 pages, or

the attachments are longer than 50 pages, the copy shall be hand delivered or sent by overnight

mail to chambers on the day of filing. The filing deadline, accordingly, will be September 28,

2006.

The dispute may be organized by category, with specific discovery items attached,

if appropriate, as an exhibit. For each disputed category or individual item, include: (1) the

specific disputed discovery category or item; (2) the response; (3) the moving party’s position;

and (4) the opposition. E.D.Cal. L.R. 37-251(c)(3). Do not file separate briefing. Id.

Privilege objections must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5). Except in

extraordinary circumstances, the party claiming privilege may not submit a post-hearing privilege

log. The failure properly to support a privilege objection with a privilege log may be deemed to

waive it. 

The moving party is responsible for filing the joint statement. The opposing party

nevertheless must timely draft and submit its portion. Failure of either party to use best efforts to

ensure timely filing will be cause for sanctions. 

Dated: 9/11/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 ___________________________________

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

U.S. Magistrate Judge

defazio.251

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 129 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 1