alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the Quarter Ended August 31, 2005 (the  "Report") by
Advanced Media Training, Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

         1.       to the best of my  knowledge,  the Report fully  complies with
                  the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the information contained in the
                  Report  fairly  presents,   in  all  material  respects,   the
                  financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.




March 22, 2006                         By:  /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Buddy Young
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                            Financial Officer
No. 46150.

#### Petition 5919-R of T. Hofmann Olsen Export Lumber Co., Inc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

The petition was dismissed as not timely.
No. 48534.

#### Protests 679332-G, etc., of F. Musco & Sons et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated by counsel that certain of the cheese in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706, and Abstract 42146). In accordance Therewith the protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 51715.

#### Protest 114834-K of Siegfried Loewenthal Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*, (33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of barrel No. 54 was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gauger’s return as verified by the affidavit of the importer. The protest was sustained to this extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Ronald Foster,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-2557 RRB PAN P

vs. Order

M. D. McDonald, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner without counsel prosecuting a

civil rights action for damages and injunctive relief against

prison officials. The case proceeds on the April 22, 2005,

amended complaint, which defendants answered September 13, 2005.

June 6, 2005, plaintiff, an ex-gang member housed on singlecell status for years, moved for a temporary restraining order

requiring he be returned to single-cell status. The motion

incorporates plaintiff’s December 2, 2004, motion for a

preliminary injunction (denied without prejudice April 8, 2005).

 

Case 2:04-cv-02557-RRB-EFB Document 25 Filed 12/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, the court hereby orders that:

1. Plaintiff’s June 6, 2005, motion for a temporary

restraining order is deemed filed the date of this order.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall serve the motion on

defendants.

3. Defendants shall respond within 30 days; plaintiff may

reply within 10 days thereafter.

Dated: December 8, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02557-RRB-EFB Document 25 Filed 12/08/05 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Re:
    
    Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated December 28, 2006 by and
among PrimeEnergy Corporation (PEC) et al as
Borrower, Guaranty Bank, FSB,
as Agent and the Lenders signatory thereto (Agreement)
  Guaranty Offshore Offshore Credit Agreement CLMA
  Contingent Obligations.




---



##### 



Very truly yours,GUARANTY BANK, FSBBy:
    /s/ David M. ButlerDavid M. ButlerVice PresidentPRIMEENERGY CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Beverly A. CummingsBeverly A. CummingsExecutive Vice PresidentPRIME OFFSHORE L.L.C.By:
    /s/ Beverly A. CummingsBeverly A. CummingsChief Executive Officer
January 6, 1943

No. 47901.

#### Protests 978146-G, etc., of Eurasia Import Co., Inc.

C. D. 693. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 10.5


 


Agreement No. INSAT-ST2 / Ku I DTH
I 01 / 2012


Dated April 19, 2012


 


Amendment No. 3 dated February 27, 2015


(Extension of Service Period)


 


WHEREAS DOS entered into an Agreement No.
INSAT-ST2 / Ku / DTH / 01 / 2012 dated April 19, 2012 with Bharat Business Channel Limited for the provision of 8x54 MHz of Ku
band space segment on INSAT-ST2 system for meeting its Direct-to-Home requirement; an Amendment No. 1 revising the terms of Agreement
in so far as Allocation of additional 2x54 MHz on INSAT-ST2 system was entered into on June 19, 2013 and an Amendment No. 2 revising
the terms of Agreement in so far as Change of name of Customer to Videocon d2h Limited, Company registered office address and Correspondence
address was entered into on July 01, 2014.


 


AND NOW
WHEREAS the term of the agreement has expired on February 28, 2015 and the parties are desirous of extending the Service Period
for a further term of forty five days, to end on 14 April 2015;


 


Accordingly, both the parties
in consideration of the mutual covenants in the original Agreement have now agreed to amend the Agreement with effect from March
01, 2015 as under;


 


		1.	The definition of "Capacity" in Article 1 (definitions) of the Agreement shall be deleted
in its entirety and replaced with the following new definition:



 


"Capacity" means
the 540 MHz clean interference free and bare Ku band transponder bandwidth, with transponder frequency management and Power Equivalent
Bandwidth, to be provided on the K5A, K5B, K6A, K6B, K7A, K7B, K8A, K8B, K9A and K9B of ST-2 Transponders.


 


		2.	The definition of "Service Period" in Article 1 (definitions) of the Principal Agreement
shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new definition:



 


"Service period""
means the period(s) for which the CUSTOMER must acquire Capacity on the respective Transponder, commencing from the Commencement
date of Services until 14 April 2015"


 


		3.	Article 2c. Transponder capacity of the Agreement shall be replaced with "CUSTOMER
and DOS agree that the Capacity shall be made available to CUSTOMER on a 24-hour, seven-days-per-week basis, for a period until
April 14, 2015.



 




    	 



    	 



    




 


		4.	All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.






 


	For and On behalf of	 	For and On behalf of
	DEPARTMENT OF SPACE	 	CUSTOMER
	 	 	 
	/s/ K. Sethuraman	 	/s/ Himanshu Patil
	Authorised Signatory	 	Authorised Signatory
	Name K. Sethuraman, Director, SCNP	 	Name Himanshu Patil
	Indian Space Research	 	Date 27/02/2015
	Organisation	 	 
	Date	 	[SEAL]
	 	 	 
	[SEAL]
Before the First Division,

April 13, 1949

No. 53018.

#### G. D. Searle & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 131416-K, etc. (Pembina).

*283Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the concentrated ox gall the subject of *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier 

                    Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2005-21348.                 

*Date Filed:*                     February 22, 2007.                 

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     March 15, 2007.                 

*Description:*                     Application of Gulfstream Air Charter, Inc. requesting the Department approve a change in its name from “Gulfstream Air Charter, Inc.” to “Gulfstream Connection, Inc.”, and that the Department reissue the commuter air carrier authorization issued on February 17, 2006.                

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2007-27416.                 

*Date Filed:*                     February 22, 2007.                 

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     March 15, 2007.                 

*Description:*                     Application of Aerolineas Galapagos AeroGal, S.A. requesting an exemption and a foreign air carrier permit, authorizing it to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between a point or points in Ecuador and the co-terminal points Miami and New York.                 

Renee V. Wright, 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. E7-4075 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
No. 56461.

protest 162029-K.

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

G. D. 1386. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
No. 49690.

#### Protest 933601-G of American Straw Goods Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items consist of hats composed of manila hemp or ramie and cellophane, similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) and Abstract 47291. In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

December 11, 1958

No. 62575.

#### The A. W. Fenton Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 297897-K, etc. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of automatic feeders the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John V. Carr & Son, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 292, C. D. 1996), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRADY ARMSTRONG, 

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-2136-GEB-PAN (JFM)-P

vs.

D. L. RUNNELS, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 17, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-02136-GEB-EFB Document 121 Filed 07/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 17, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. Plaintiff’s February 7, 2005, request for a preliminary injunction is denied. 

Dated: July 13, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02136-GEB-EFB Document 121 Filed 07/14/06 Page 2 of 2
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000516 31-JUL-2013 07:47 AM
No. 53022.

#### G. D. Searle & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 144618-K (Pembina).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of “ox gall concentrate,” the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARSHALL LOSKOT, an individual; )

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT ) CIV. S-04-1992 GEB PAN

EDUCATION, SERVICES: HELPING YOU )

HELP OTHERS, a California public )

benefit corporation, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

UNITED PETROLEUM TRUCK STOP; ) CONFERENCE

RAKESH SEHGAL, an individual; and )

SEHGAL, INC., a California )

corporation, )

)

Defendants. )

)

Plaintiff’s Status Report, filed on October 16, 2005,

reveals that the Magistrate Judge has submitted matters for decision. 

Therefore, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for October

31, 2005, is continued to March 6, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiffs

shall file a status report no later than February 21, 2006, in which

Plaintiffs are only required to explain the above referenced submitted

matters.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 20, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-01992-GEB-PAN Document 34 Filed 10/21/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 59006.

protest 243043-K (New York).

#### N. M. Albert Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Nathaniel Energy
Corporation


Dated  May 14, 2003                         By:  /s/  Stan Abrams
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Name:  Stan Abrams
                                                 Title:  Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Nathaniel Energy Corporation
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMAN STRICKLAND,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2334 KJM

vs.

CITY OF STOCKTON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

A status conference was held in this matter on May 25, 2005 before the

undersigned. Miles Washington appeared for plaintiff. Shelley Green appeared for defendants. 

Upon consideration of the status report on file in this action, discussion of counsel and good

cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. Expert witnesses shall be disclosed no later than December 7, 2005.

2. Discovery, including the hearing of discovery motions, shall be completed by

January 18, 2006. Discovery motions, if needed, shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 37-

251.

3. Dispositive motions, other than discovery motions, shall be noticed to be

heard by March 22, 2006.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02334-KJM Document 9 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

4. The pretrial conference is set for May 17, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. before the

undersigned. Pretrial statements shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 16-281.

5. Trial of this matter is set for August 14, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. before the

undersigned. The parties shall file trial briefs in accordance with Local Rule 16-285.

DATED: May 26, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

006

strickland.oas

Case 2:04-cv-02334-KJM Document 9 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 52007BP0015 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007BP0015

**European Parliament resolution on Draft amending budget No 1/2007 of the European Union for the financial year 2007: agreement resulting from the trialogue on 28 November 2006 − Structural Funds, European Fisheries Fund, European Investment Fund and Joint Research Centre, Section III - Commission (5739/2007 - C6-0060/2007 - 2006/2303(BUD)) **

*
Official Journal 250 E , 25/10/2007 P. 0086 - 0086 *

P6_TA(2007)0015

Draft amending budget No 1/2007

European Parliament resolution on Draft amending budget No 1/2007 of the European Union for the financial year 2007: agreement resulting from the trialogue on 28 November 2006 — Structural Funds, European Fisheries Fund, European Investment Fund and Joint Research Centre, Section III — Commission (5739/2007 — C6-0060/2007 — 2006/2303(BUD))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 272(4), penultimate subparagraph, thereof,

- having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 177 thereof,

- having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [1], and in particular Articles 37 and 38 thereof,

- having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007, as finally adopted on 14 December 2006,

- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management [2],

- having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 1/2007 of the European Union for the financial year 2007, which the Commission presented on 20 December 2006 (SEC(2006)1776),

- having regard to Draft amending budget No 1/2007, which the Council established on 30 January 2007 (5739/2007 — C6-0060/2007),

- having regard to Rule 69 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A6-0010/2007),

A. whereas technical adjustments are necessary so as the outcome of the trialogue meeting on 28 November 2006 can be taken into account and implemented in the budget of the European Union for 2007,

B. whereas the purpose of Draft amending budget No 1/2007 is to introduce those adjustments,

1. Welcomes Draft amending budget No 1/2007;

2. Approves Draft amending budget No 1/2007 unamended;

3. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

[2] OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

--------------------------------------------------
No. 54064.

#### Bein Trading Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 148564-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEMIAN TREVOR O’KEEFFE,

NO. CIV. S-04-1695 WBS GGH PS

Plaintiff,

v.

EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, et al.,

ORDER

Defendants.

_______________________________/

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment presently is calendared for hearing on

June 1, 2006. Having reviewed the record, the court has determined that oral argument would

not be of material assistance in determining the pending motion. Accordingly, the court will not

entertain oral argument, and will determine the motion on the record, including the briefing in

support of and in opposition to the pending motion. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 78-230(h). 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The June 1, 2006 hearing on the motion for summary judgment, filed April 10,

2006, is vacated; and

2. The motion is submitted on the record. 

DATED: 5/26/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

 U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:076:O'Keeffe1695.vac.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-01695-GGH Document 36 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

October 18, 1948

No. 52621.

petition 6492-R (Los Angeles).

#### William Prentiss, Jr., as Trustee in Bankruptcy of National Merchandise Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Prom the testimony it appeared that prior to filing the entries herein the customs broker submitted the invoices to the examiner; that the invoice values were the purchase prices of the merchandise, but that the merchandise could not be made up for a period of 5 or 6 months; that when it was shipped, there was a higher value on it; that entry was made at the invoice value because the appraiser did not have any value; that the appraised values represented the market values upon the dates of exportation, as distinguished from the market values on the dates of purchase; that the issue as to whether goods are dutiable at their purchase price when it takes a period of time to manufacture them, or at the quotations on the date of exportation, was settled by the courts *[White Lamb Finlay, Inc.*v. *United States,*29 C. C. P. A. 199, G. A. D. 192] subsequent to the filing of these entries and appeals for reappraisement; and that such appeals were abandoned after the decision above referred to had been rendered. Although the entries in the instant case appeared to have been based upon an erroneous conception of the law, the evidence did not indicate that there was any intent to deceive the appraiser or defraud the revenue. The petition was therefore granted.