alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

A meeting of the Exporters' Textile Advisory Committee will be held on Thursday, April 12, 2007 from 1:00-4:00 at the Ronald Reagan Building, Trade Information Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004, Training Room A. 

The ETAC is a national advisory committee that advises Department of Commerce officials on the identification of export barriers, and on market expansion activities. With the elimination of textile quotas under the WTO agreement on textiles and clothing, the Administration is committed to encouraging U.S. textile and apparel firms to export and remain competitive in the global market. 

The meeting will be open to the public with a limited number of seats available. For further information or copies of the minutes, contact Rachel Alarid at (202) 482-5154. 

Date: March 5, 2007. 

R. Matthew Priest, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Textiles and Apparel. 

[FR Doc.E7-4282 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Exhibit
32.1






Section 1350 Certification
of Principal Executive Officer







The
undersigned, the Chairman, President and Treasurer of Jaco Electronics, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended June 30, 2008 (the “Annual Report”) accompanying this certification fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
presented as required by such report. The foregoing certification is based upon,
among other things, my responsibilities as principal executive officer of the
Company, my own due diligence and representations made by certain other members
of the Company’s senior management.





Date:  September
29, 2008





/s/ Joel H.
Girsky


Joel H.
Girsky


Chairman,
President and Treasurer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
No. 55951.

protest 151964-K (Baltimore).

#### Lloyd A. Pfeiffer Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoices should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with'Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Michael Schaffer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Case Financial, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers' and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


                                        /s/ Michael Schaffer
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael Schaffer
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        January 11, 2007
Before the Third Division,

July 9, 1943

No. 48533.

#### Protests 730132-G (B), etc., of Galvanoni & Nevy Brothers et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated by counsel that certain of the cheese In question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706, and Abstract 42146). In accordance therewith the protests were sustained to this extent.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14129-14130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06276]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0102; FRL-9924-39]

Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee; Extension of Deadline for 
Nominations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; Extension of nomination period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14130]]

SUMMARY: This document extends the deadline for submitting a nomination 
to serve on the Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee (PPDC) for 30 days 
from the original deadline of March 16, 2015 to April 16, 2015. The 
nomination period is being extended to ensure the Agency receives a 
diverse range of qualified candidates.

DATES: Nominations must be received on or before April 16, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions provided in the Federal 
Register document of February 13, 2015 (80 FR 8082) (FRL-9922-90).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dea Zimmerman, Designated Federal 
Officer for the PPDC, telephone number: (312) 353-6344; email address: 
zimmerman.dea@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register document of February 
13, 2015 (80 FR 8082) (FRL-9922-90), EPA invited nominations to be 
considered for appointment to the PPDC. EPA is hereby extending the 
deadline for nomination to April 16, 2015.
    To submit nominations, please follow the detailed instructions 
provided under ADDRESSES, in the Federal Register document of February 
13, 2015. If you have questions, consult the person listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: March 11, 2015.
Jack E. Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-06276 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Case 2:04-cv-01955-MCE -PAN   Document 25    Filed 06/29/05   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-25T12:01:09-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4603 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4603

  To authorize the appropriation of amounts for the construction of a 
  dining hall and services training facility at Savannah Air National 
                          Guard Base, Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2024

  Mr. Ossoff introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the appropriation of amounts for the construction of a 
  dining hall and services training facility at Savannah Air National 
                          Guard Base, Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Savannah CRTC Dining Hall 
Construction Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A DINING HALL AND 
              SERVICES TRAINING FACILITY AT SAVANNAH AIR NATIONAL GUARD 
              BASE, GEORGIA.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Defense 
for fiscal year 2025 $27,000,000 for the construction of a dining hall 
and services training facility at Savannah Air National Guard Base, 
Georgia.
                                 <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****...Winom-Frazier OHV complexand Desolation OHV trail system [electronic resource].**
 
2014|2013|
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:UM 1/10/

Item Number: 0080-G (online)

CGP systemNumber:000932268
August 20, 2018
Before the Third Division,

July 2, 1941

No. 46149.

#### Petition 6167-R of Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the evidence presented it was found that the petitioner acted in good faith and without intention to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.
Date: 20150811 Revision: 1.0 Revision:1.0

Page 1 of 1

PRIVACY INFORMATION - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

Appendix B 

PRIVACY POLICY

One area of notable concern requiring attention regarding public and civil use of UAS technologies is 

personal privacy. Vantage Point Aerial Productions LLC believes that respect of individual privacy 

guaranteed by our Constitution and the Fourth Amendment are sacrosanct and the potential for UAS 

technology to usurp those rights is very real. As with all new technology, we must move slowly in its 

application as we seek to include it in our daily lives. There are many emotional issues to overcome 

in the use of UAS technologies and part of our job in the UAS community is to ensure we educate 

and gain the trust of all people to ensure we are ever mindful of their privacy concerns. 

Vantage Point Aerial Productions will comply with any federal, state, and/or local privacy policies or 

rules that may apply in particular areas where DJI UAS are used. Further, because we will only fly 

over private property with the permission of the land owner, the likelihood that we will collect 

private information of an unknown person is minimal. Information provided to customers will be 

masked to include only the acreage for which they are responsible, further limiting the possibility of 

a trespass of privacy.

.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-20498

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERA YVETTE CHANEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CR-199-ALL

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Tera Yvette Chaney has filed a

motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Chaney has filed a

response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief,

and Chaney’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT  32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

	The undersigned, William K. Mackey, Chief Executive Officer, and Robert
Hipple, Chief Financial Officer of United EcoEnergy Corp. (the Company), DO
HEREBY CERTIFY, that:

1.	The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 28th of February, 2006.

								    /s/ William K. Mackey
								By .........................
								  William K. Mackey,
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

								/s/ Robert Hipple
								By..........................
								   Robert Hipple,
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to United EcoEnergy Corp. and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH ALLEN NEIGHBORS,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-2238-GEB-KJM-P

vs.

R. AGATHA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 8, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-02238-GEB -KJM Document 12 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 8, 2005, are adopted in

full; 

2. This action is dismissed.

Dated: January 26, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02238-GEB -KJM Document 12 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 53587.

protests 125147-K, etc. (New York).

#### Tuteur Bio-Chemical, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 53541.

protests 53285-K and 56160-K (Boston).

#### Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/23

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■

■ ■

★

●

●

●

★ ●

●

●

●
#### Jami M. Majewski, Appellant, v Jeffrey A. Majewski, Appellant, and Anthony A. Capetola, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 1019]

—Separate appeals, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.15, from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated January 31, 1995, which fixed the compensation for a judicial appointee, and (2) an order of the same court, dated February 10, 1995, which denied the plaintiffs motion, in effect, to vacate the prior order fixing compensation and to fix the compensation pursuant to CPLR 8003 (a).

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 13, 1994, which referred the matter to a Referee, set forth a specific means of compensating the Referee; that is, upon his affirmation of services rendered, the court would determine an appropriate fee to be shared equally by the parties. Consequently, this case is distinguishable from those relied on by the appellants, namely, *Seher v Apt*(100 AD2d 582), *Neuman v Syosset Hosp. Anesthesia Group*(112 AD2d 1029), and *Kolomick v Kolomick*(133 AD2d 69), where the orders of reference were silent as to the Referees’ compensation, thus limiting them to the statutory fee of $50 per diem *(see,*CPLR 8003 [a]).

In addition, the record reveals that the plaintiff-appellant stipulated to the order of reference, which included a provision that the court would fix the fee of the Referee *(see, e.g., Morrison v Bethlehem Steel Corp.,*75 AD2d 1001). Balletta, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.
March 16, 1945

No. 50060.

Suit 4438.

#### *Tonkin Distributing Co. et al.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 727 modified January 4, 1945. C. A. D. 295.
No. 61328.

protest 309008-K (Los Angeles).

#### Guy B. Barham Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In conformity with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the case was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A1 63 6 . THE STATE v . GARDNER

Pu rs uan t t o OC G A § 5 -7 -1 (a) (5 ), t h e St at e fi l ed t h i s pre-t ri al di rect ap p eal

fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er ex cl u d i n g ev i d en ce t h at t he St at e s ou g h t b y m o t i o n t o u s e

at t h e t ri al o f Ro d d ri ck C. Gard n er o n ch arg es t h at he v i o lat ed p ro v i s i o n s o f OCGA

§ 4 0-6 -3 9 1

.

OCGA § 5 -7 -1 (a) (5 ) p ro v i d es t h at :

An ap p eal m ay b e t ak en b y an d o n b eh al f o f t h e St at e o f Geo rg i a fro m

t h e s u p er i o r co u rt s

, s t at e co u rt s

, an d ju v en i l e co u rt s an d s u ch o t h er

co u rt s fro m w h i ch a d i rect ap p eal is au t ho ri zed t o th e Co u rt of Ap p eal s

o r th e Su p rem e Co u rt i n cri m i n al cas es an d ad ju di cat i o n o f d el i nq u en cy

cas es

. . . [ f

] ro m an o rd er, d eci s i o n

, or ju dg m en t ex cl u d i n g an y o t h er

ev i d en ce t o b e u s ed b y t h e s t at e at t ri al o n an y m o t i o n fi l ed b y th e s t at e

o r d e f e n d a n t a t l eas t 3 0 d ay s p ri o r t o tri al an d ru led o n p ri o r t o th e

i m p an el i n g o f a ju ry o r t h e d efen dan t b ei ng p u t i n jeo p ard y

, wh ich ev er

o ccu rs fi rs t, i f: (A) No t wi t h s t an d i n g t h e pro v i s i o n s o f Co d e Sect i o n

5

- 6 -3 8

, t h e n o t i ce o f ap p eal fi l ed p u rs u an t t o t hi s p arag rap h i s f i l e d

wi t h in t wo d ay s o f s u ch o rd er, d eci si o n

, o r ju d g m en t ; a n d ( B ) T he

p ro s ecu t i ng at t o rn ey cert i fi es to t h e t ri al c o u rt t h at s u ch ap peal i s n o t

t ak en fo r p u rp os e o f d el ay an d th at t h e ev i d en ce i s a s u b s t an t i al p ro o f o f

a m at eri al fact i n th e p ro ceed i n g.

No t hi n g i n t h e reco rd s h ows t h at t h e St at e co m p l i ed wi t h t h e req u i rem en t fo r ap p eal

s et fo rt h i n s u b s ect io n (B) t h at “ [t ] h e p ro s ecu ti n g at t o rn ey cert i fi es t o t he tri al co u rt

t h a t s u ch ap p eal i s n ot t ak en fo r p u rp o se o f d el ay an d th at t h e ev i d en ce i s a February 14, 2018s u b s t an t i al p ro o f of a m at eri al fact in t h e p ro cee d i n g

. ” A c co rd i n g l y

, t h e St at e h as

fai l ed t o co m

p ly wi t h t h e req ui rem en t s fo r an ap p eal p urs u an t t o OCGA § 5 -7 -1 (a)

(5 ), an d t h e ap peal i s DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/14/2018