Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 50 / Friday, March 14, 2014 / Notices 14507 

period, which closed on October 25, 

2013. 

The EPA reviewed each comment 

received and prepared a Response to 

Comments document for the two 

projects. After consideration of the 

expressed view of all interested persons, 

the pertinent federal statutes and 

regulations, the applications and 

supplemental information submitted by 

the applicants, and additional material 

relevant to the applications and 

contained in the Administrative 

Records, the EPA made final 

determinations in accordance with title 

40 CFR part 52 and part 55 (for Statoil) 

to issue final air permits. 

Under 40 CFR 124.19(f)(2), notice of 

any final Agency action regarding a PSD 

permit must be published in the Federal 

Register. Section 307(b)(1) of the CAA 

provides for review of final Agency 

action that is locally or regionally 

applicable in the United States Court of 

Appeals for the appropriate circuit. 

Such a petition for review of final 

Agency action must be filed within 60 

days from the date of notice of such 

action in the Federal Register. For 

purposes of judicial review under the 

CAA, final Agency action occurs when 

a final PSD permit is issued or denied 

by the EPA and Agency review 

procedures are exhausted, per 40 CFR 

124.19(f)(1). 

Any person who filed comments on 

the draft permits was provided the 

opportunity to petition the 

Environmental Appeals Board by the 

end of November 26, 2013 for the Statoil 

permit, by the end of December 26, 2013 

for the PEEC permit, or by the end of 

January 17, 2014 for the TECO permit. 

No petitions were submitted for any of 

these permits. Therefore, the Statoil 

permit became effective on November 

27, 2013. The PEEC permit became 

effective on December 27, 2013. This 

date was changed from December 25, 

2013, as stated on the final permit, to 

correct for the effective date coinciding 

with a federal holiday. The TECO 

permit became effective on January 18, 

2014. 

Dated: February 27, 2014. 

Carol L. Kemker, 

Acting Director, Air, Pesticides and Toxics, 

Management Division, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2014–05737 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9907–84–Region–10] 

Final Modification of the National 

Pollutant Discharge Elimination 

System (NPDES) General Permit (GP) 

for Small Suction Dredges in Idaho, 

IDG370000 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final notice of modification of 

a general permit. 

SUMMARY: When the 2013 General 

Permit (GP) was issued, the language of 

the GP contained a discrepancy with the 

total maximum daily load (TMDL) that 

was issued for Mores Creek. The 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

proposed to modify the permit on 

December 18, 2013, and provided a 45 

day comment period. EPA prepared a 

Response to Comments and modified 

the GP so it now includes the tributaries 

of Mores, Elk or Grimes creeks in the 

loading allocations of the TMDL and a 

list of these tributaries in Appendix F. 

DATES: The modified GP will be 

effective on April 14, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the modified 

general permit, Statement of Basis and 

Response to Comments are available 

upon request. Requests may be made to 

Tracy DeGering at (208) 378–5756 or to 

Cindi Godsey at (907) 271–6561. 

Requests may also be electronically 

mailed to: degering.tracy@epa.gov or 

godsey.cindi@epa.gov. 

Written requests may be submitted to 

EPA, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, 

Suite 900, OWW–130, Seattle, WA 

98101. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

GP, Statement of Basis and Response to 

Comments along with detailed maps 

and other useful information may be 

found on the Region 10 Web site at: 

http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/water.nsf/

npdes+permits/idsuction-gp. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Executive Order 12866: The Office of 

Management and Budget has exempted 

this action from the review 

requirements of Executive Order 12866 

pursuant to Section 6 of that order. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: Under the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq., a Federal agency 

must prepare an initial regulatory 

flexibility analysis ‘‘for any proposed 

rule’’ for which the agency ‘‘is required 

by section 553 of the Administrative 

Procedure Act (APA), or any other law, 

to publish general notice of proposed 

rulemaking.’’ The RFA exempts from 

this requirement any rule that the 

issuing agency certifies ‘‘will not, if 

promulgated, have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities.’’ EPA has 

concluded that NPDES general permits 

are permits, not rulemakings, under the 

APA and thus not subject to APA 

rulemaking requirements or the RFA. 

Notwithstanding that general permits 

are not subject to the RFA, EPA has 

determined that these general permits, 

as issued, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. 

Dated: March 5, 2014. 

Daniel D. Opalski, 

Director, Office of Water & Watersheds, 

Region 10, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

[FR Doc. 2014–05724 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9907–95–Region–4; CERCLA–04– 

2013–3763] 

LWD, Inc. Superfund Site; Calverty 

City, Marshall County, Kentucky; 

Notice of Settlement 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of Settlement. 

SUMMARY: Under 122(h) of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (CERCLA), the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

has entered into a settlement with the 

approximately fifty (50) parties 

concerning the LWD, Inc. Superfund 

Site located in Calvert City, Marshall 

County, Kentucky. The settlement 

addresses remaining costs from a fundlead Removal Action taken by the EPA 

at the Site. 

DATES: The Agency will consider public 

comments on the settlement until April 

14, 2014. The Agency will consider all 

comments received and may modify or 

withdraw its consent to the settlement 

if comments received disclose facts or 

considerations which indicate that the 

amended settlement is inappropriate, 

improper, or inadequate. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are 

available from the Agency by contacting 

Ms. Paula V. Painter, Environmental 

Protection Specialist using the contact 

information provided in this notice. 

Comments may also be submitted by 

referencing the Site’s name through one 

of the following methods: 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES