T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F E L I P E E . AR AG ON T R I NI DA D, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 05- 75040 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 743- 894 ME MOR AN DU M *

F E L I P E E . AR AG ON T R I NI DA D, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70423 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 743- 894

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls 

# FI LED FEB 19 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). 2 S ubm i tt e d F e bruary10, 2010 ** S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: H A L L , T H O M P S O N an dM cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es.

F e l i pe E . A r a gon T r i ni da d ( “ A r a gon” ) , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pet i t i on s f

or re vi ew of the order of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s ( “ B IA ”) f in d in g h im in e lig ib le f

o rc an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l, an dth e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f h is m o tio n to r e o p e n du e to c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s m a k in g h im p r im af a c ie e lig ib le f o ra s y l u m a n dwi th h o l d i n g o f r e m o v a l . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA corr ec t l y hel d thatA ra go n’ s petty theftand d om es t i c vi ol ence c onvi c t i ons c ons t i tut e d c r i m e s of m or a l turpi tude tha tr e nde r e d hi m i ne l i gi bl e f or cancel l at i on of re m ov al . C on traryt o A ra go n’ s argum ent s, petty theftun der C a l i f orni aP e na l C ode § 484( a ) c ont a i ns the r e qui s i t e m e ns r e a— na m e l y , the spec i fi c i nt entt o d epri ve the vi ct i m of hi s property perm anent l y— for am oral tu rp itu d e o f

f e n s e . C a s tillo - C ru z v . H o ld e r , 5 8 1 F .3 d1 1 5 4 , 1 1 6 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . A rag o n al so co n ced edb efo re th e B IA th ath i s d o m est i c v i o l en ce o ffen se c ons t i tut e d ac r i m e of

m or a l turpi tude . B e c aus e A r a gon w a s thus c onvi c t e d of m o r e th a n o n e c r im e o f

m o r a l tu rp itu d e , A r a g o n w a s in e lig ib le f o rth e “p e tty3

offe nse” exce pt i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 18 2(a) (2)( A )( i i )( II ). S ee In re G ar ci a- H ernand ez , 23 I& N D ec . 59 0, 59 4-96 (B IA 20 03 ). A ra go n w as al so se para t el y barre d from cancel l at i on by hi s c on vi ct i on of a d o m e s tic v io le n c e o f

f e n s e a s d e f

in e da t 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 7 ( a ) ( 2 ) . S e e 8 U .S .C . § 1229b( b) ( 1) ( C ) ( i m pos i ng bar ) ; V a s que z - H e rnande z v. H ol de r , 590 F . 3d 1053, 1 0 5 5 -5 6 (9 th C i r. 2 0 1 0 ) (h o l d i n g th atC al i fo rn i a P en al C o d e § 2 7 3 . 5 co n st i tu t es a c r i m e of dom e s t i c vi ol e nc e ) . A r a gon’ s a r gum e nttha tthi s ba rappl i e s onl yt o nonc i t i z e ns w ho ha ve be e n a dm i tt e d t o the U ni t e d S t a t e s i s una va i l i ng. A l though 8 U . S . C . § 1227( a ) ( 2) ( E ) ( i ) r e nde r s a dm i tt e d non- c i t i z e ns de port abl e ba s e d on do m es t i c vi ol ence conv i ct i on s, i tal so defi nes tho se do m es t i c vi ol ence offe nses that re nd erno n-ci t i ze ns i nel i gi bl e f or cancel l at i on re l i ef

. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g A r a g o n ’s m o tio n to r e o p e n . T he r e i s no i ndi c a t i on tha tthe B oa r d r e qui r e d tha tA r a gon s how c onc l us i ve e lig ib ilityf

o ra s y lu m a n dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l, a s o p p o s e dto ar e a s o n ab le l i ke l i hood of

r e l i e f . R a the r , i n de e m i ng A r a gon’ s e vi de nc e t o be i m m a t e r i a l , the B oa r d e f f e c t i ve l yhe l d tha tA r a gon ha d f a i l e d t o s how pr i m af

a c i e e l i gi bi l i tyf

or re l i ef . T he B oard al so di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n fi nd i ng thatthe changed c ondi t i ons i n O a xa c a , M e xi c o di d notr e nde rA r a gon pr i m af a c i e e l i gi bl e f

or a s y lu m an dw ith h o ld in g . T h e r e is n o e v id e n c e th a t A r a g o n h a s b e e n p o litic a lly4

ac t i ve i n the U ni t ed S t at es or M exi co, or thathi s f am i l y m em bers have been s ub je c t to p e r s e c u tio n f

o rth e irp o litic a l a c tiv itie s . T h u s , A r a g o n “f a ile dto de m ons tr a t e a n obj e c t i ve ba s i s f or[ hi s ] f e artha t[ he ] w oul d be t ar ge t e d f or pers ec ut i on ” a s “ the evi dence he i ntrodu ce d w as t oo generalt o d em on strat e a w e l l - f ounde d f e artha t[ he ] w oul d pe r s ona l l ybe pe r s e c ut e d . . . . ” K ons t ant i novav. IN S , 1 9 5 F . 3 d5 2 8 , 5 3 0 (9 th C i r. 1 9 9 9 ). G i v en th atA rag o n fai l edt o est ab l i sh pri m a f ac i e e l i gi bi l i ty f

or re l i ef , w e nee d n otaddres s the i nt ernal re l ocat i on i ss ue. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.