alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 7,890.

#### KNOEDLER v. SCHELL (two cases).

[17 Leg. Int. 373.]

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

1860.

Customs Duties — Colored Engravings — Act op 1S57.

These actions were brought to recover the difference between S per cent, and 15 per cent., exacted of the plaintiff [Michael Knoedler] as duties on colored engravings. The tariff act of 1846 [9 Stát. 42] levied a duty of 10 per cent, on “engravings or plates bound or unbound.” The act of 1857 [11 Stat. 192] levied a duty of 8 per cent. The collector [Augustus Schell] claimed that colored engravings were not engravings, and therefore should be classed as non-enumerated articles, and pay a duty of 15 per cent. It was proved on the trial that for forty years both plain and colored engravings have been imported, and known in trade under the general name of engravings, and that the fact of the engravings being colored did not change its character. That during the existence of the tariff act of 1846, or from December, 1846, to.July, 1857, when the language of the act was precisely the same as in the act of 1857, the government did not pretend that colored engravings should pay a higher rate of duty than plain or uncolored engravings. The United States offered no evidence in defence.

NELSON, Circuit Justice,

ruled that there was no authority for the exaction of more than 8 per cent, duty, and the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict for the excess paid in both actions.

[A motion was subsequently made in this case to set aside an execution against the personal effects of the collector. The motion was overruled. Case No. 7,889.]
Before the Third Division,

April 19, 1946

No. 51027.

#### Protest 78522-K of R. U. Delapenha & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the preserved ginger is composed in part of manufactured sugar, but not in chief value thereof, and is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in Abstract 45762. In accordance therewith the merchandise was held not subject to the assessment under the Sugar Act of 1937.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v PRINCE S. CRAWFORD, Sergeant, U. S. Army, Appellant

16 USCMA 149, 36 CMR 305

No. 19,191

March 18, 1966

*Colonel Joseph L. Chalk, Lieutenant Colonel Jacob Hagopian,*and *Captain Beverly B. Bates*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel Joseph J. Crimmins, Lieutenant Colonel Francis M. Cooper,*and *First Lieutenant Maurice Jay Kutner*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The question presented on this appeal is the same as that considered in United States v Metz, 16 USCMA 140, 36 CMR 296. For the reasons set out in our opinion in that case, the decision of the board of review is reversed and the action of the convening authority is set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for submission to another competent reviewing authority for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
No. 62601.

#### Albert Bonnier Publishing House, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 178534-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 39, C. A. D. 669), the claim at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified by T. D. 51802, for “Furniture, * * * Chairs,” was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of furniture the same as that in C. A. D. 669, *supra,*were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under the provision in said paragraph 412, as modified, *supra,*for other furniture.
Before the First Division,

March 29, 1945

No. 50075.

#### Protests 23078-K, etc., of Royal Bead & Novelty Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the beads in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), certain of the items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 and others at 20 percent under the same paragraph as modified by T. D. 49458. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Corporate Property Associates 16  Global
Incorporated.
  /s/ Gordon F. DuGanGordon F. DuGanChief Executive OfficerDate 8/14/2009/s/ Mark J. DeCesarisMark J. DeCesarisActing Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350 The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 of Jafra Worldwide Holdings (Lux) S.àr.l.
(the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ GARY ESHLEMANGary EshlemanChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
 August 13, 2004 67
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

AVERY SOUFFRANT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1335

[July 11, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Lynch, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 13-242CF10A.

Avery Souffrant, Lake Butler, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
DENIED and Opinion F iled October 17, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00622-CV IN RE CHRISTOPHER J. MALLIN, Relator Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-19-03131-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Smith, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Smith In his June 26, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from the probate court’s order denying his “Mo tion to Compel Settlement of Maternal Share of Estate.” Entitlement to mandamus relief requires re lator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that rela tor lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petiti on and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.–2– Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a).

230622F.P05 /C r aig Smith / CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
No. 49694.

#### Protests 72393-K, etc., of F. Lester Kittle, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel sole crepe rubber similar to that the subject of *United States*v. *F. Lester Kittle, Inc.*(31 C. C. P. A. 233, C. A. D. (276 was held entitled to free entry as claimed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10819 and <greek-i>10820]


Georgia Disaster Number GA-00008

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Georgia (FEMA-1686-DR), dated 3/3/2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 3/1/2007 through 3/2/2007.

DATES: Effective Date: 3/6/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 5/2/2007.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/3/2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Georgia, dated 3/3/2007 is hereby amended 
to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:
Primary Counties: Baker, Crawford, Mcduffie, Mitchell, Taylor
Contiguous Counties:
    Georgia: Bibb, Calhoun, Colquitt, Columbia, Decatur, Dougherty, 
Early, Grady, Houston, Jefferson, Lincoln, Miller, Monroe, Peach, 
Richmond, Talbot, Thomas, Upson, Warren, Wilkes, Worth

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008.)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-4550 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PERCY BRADLEY, No. CIV-S-04-2033 MCE/DAD P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

CAPTAIN LEA, ET AL.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On April 28, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-02033-MCE -DAD Document 18 Filed 06/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 28, 2005,

are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s February 7, 2005 motion for an injunction is

denied.

DATED: June 15, 2005

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:04-cv-02033-MCE -DAD Document 18 Filed 06/15/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 64131.

protests 12995-K, etc. (New York).

#### Edw. *&*John Burke, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-111744, 333-14591, and 333-56048 of KimballInternational, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated August 31, 2009, relating tothe consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule ofKimball International, Inc. and the effectiveness ofKimball International, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of Kimball International, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2009.

 

 

|                                                          |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP                                 |   |
|                                                               |   |
| DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPIndianapolis, IndianaAugust 31, 2009 |   |
```

[111th Congress Public Law 300]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 3270]]

Public Law 111-300
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  2 Government Center in Fall River, Massachusetts, as the ``Sergeant 
 Robert Barrett Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 14, 2010 -  [H.R. 
                                5758]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT ROBERT BARRETT POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2 Government Center in Fall River, Massachusetts, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sergeant Robert Barrett Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Robert Barrett Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 14, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5758:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Nov. 16, 17, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 2, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10785-10786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4250]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


New Melones Lake Project Resource Management Plan/Environmental 
Impact Statement (RMP/EIS), Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties, CA

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of extension of the scoping period for the New Melones 
RMP/EIS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation is extending the scoping period for 
the RMP/EIS to March 19, 2007. The notice of intent for the RMP/EIS was 
published in the Federal Register on December 18, 2006 (71 FR 75769). 
The scoping period was originally to end on February 16, 2007.
    During the scoping process, several individuals and organizations 
have indicated that submission of scoping comments by the February 16, 
2007 would be a difficult deadline to meet. To encourage additional 
public input, the public comment period has been extended.

DATES: Written comments on the scope of the proposed RMP/EIS should be

[[Page 10786]]

received by close of business March 19, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Send your comments to Ms. Elizabeth Vasquez, Natural 
Resource Specialist, Central California Area Office, Bureau of 
Reclamation, 7794 Folsom Dam Road, Folsom, CA 95630, or e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cf9eafdefede9f9e6dcf1ecb2e9effeeeb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1b4a7b0a2a0a4b4ab91bca1ffa4a2b3a3ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Elizabeth Vasquez at 916-988-1707.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments received in response to this notice 
will become part of the administrative record and are subject to public 
inspection. Our practice is to make comments, including names, home 
addresses, home phone numbers, and e-mail addresses of respondents, 
available for public review. Individual respondents may request that we 
withhold their names and/or home addresses, etc., but if you wish us to 
consider withholding this information, you must state this prominently 
at the beginning of your comments. In addition, you must present a 
rationale for withholding this information. This rationale must 
demonstrate that disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted 
invasion of privacy. Unsupported assertions will not meet this burden. 
In the absence of exceptional, documentable circumstances, this 
information will be released. We will always make submissions from 
organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying 
themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or 
businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.

    Dated: February 12, 2007.
John Fields,
Acting Regional Environmental Officer, Mid-Pacific Region.
 [FR Doc. E7-4250 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



EXHIBIT 8 CERTIFICATION pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Sun Life Financial Inc. (the Company) for
the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
respective knowledge:  (1)
    the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:
February 14, 2005/S/ Donald A. StewartDonald A. StewartChief Executive OfficerDate:
February 14, 2005/S/ Paul W. DerksenPaul W. DerksenExecutive Vice-President andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.2

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors
Witness Systems, Inc.

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-33250 and No. 333-67416) on Form S-8 of Witness
Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 2003, except as to Note 11, which is as of February 28, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Witness
Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related schedule, which reports appear in the Witness Systems, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year 2002.

Atlanta,
Georgia
March 14, 2003

| |  |  | /s/KPMG LLPKPMG LLP
| |  |  | -------------------

---

QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Potomac Realty Trust (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Douglas J. Donatelli, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Date: August 9, 2004
    
    /s/ Douglas J. Donatelli
Douglas J. Donatelli
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





September
25, 2002


The Board of Directors


and Shareholders


Mobile PET Systems, Inc.


2150 West Washington Street, Suite 110


San Diego, California 92110





As the independent public accountants for Mobile PET Systems, Inc. we
hereby consent to the incorporation in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Mobile PET Systems, Inc., of our report dated September 25, 2002, regarding the June 30, 2002 and 2001, consolidated financial statements. We also consent to all other
references to our company included in this annual report.





PETERSON &
CO.





Peterson & Co.


3655 Nobel Drive, Suite
500


San Diego, California 92122-1089
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 163 DB 2020 (No. 97 RST 2020)

:

PHILLIP CHARLES BLACKMAN : Attorney Registration No. 307527

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14 th day of December

, 2020 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated December 3

, 2020

, is approved and it is ORDERED

that Phillip Charles Blackman

, who has been on Inactive Status

, h as demonstrated that

he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner

.
No. 38867.

#### Protest 451137-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain of the items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2010

p1018 

# Order

October 26, 2010

139582

PATRICIA PAQUETTE, Guardian and Conservator of RICHARD PAQUETTE, a Legally Incapacitated Person, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139582 COA: 279909 Macomb CC: 2 004-002787-NO STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant,

and

ARVILLA WOODS, SHANNE SMITH, and MARISSA GIBBONS, Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of February 26, 2010, the applic ation for leave to appeal the July 21, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in ab eyance pending the decision in Univ of Mich Regents v Titan Ins Co (Docket No. 136905). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 31, 2010, 487 Mich ___ (20 10), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that th e questions presented
should be reviewed by this Court.

C ORRIGAN

, J. ( concurring ).

I continue to adhere to the an alyses set forth in Justice M ARKMAN ’s dissenting opinion in Univ of Mich Regents v Titan Ins Co , 487 Mich ___ (2010), and my statement dissenting from the denial of re hearing in that case, ___ Mi ch ___ (2010) (October 15, 2010).

D AVIS

, J., not participating. I recuse myse lf and am not participating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).