alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Anmore, Inc. for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2005, I, Giorgio Saumat, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Anmore, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 

1.      Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Anmore, Inc. 

 
| Dated: August 22, 2005 |
|------------------------|

 

**ANMORE, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Giorgio Saumat*Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 59523.

protests 187846-K, etc.

#### Fairfield Wool Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Abstract 59074. (Initial No. 17082F-K.) Motion of Government for rehearing granted.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 76441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29909]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Eighteenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable 
Lithium Battery and Battery Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting notice of RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable 
Lithium Battery and Battery Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
eighteenth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable 
Lithium Battery and Battery Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held January 20-22, 2015 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th 
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0662/(202) 833-9339, fax (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org. In addition, Jennifer Iversen may be contacted directly 
at email: jiversen@rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 225. The agenda will 
include the following:

January 20th

 Introductions and administrative items (including DFO & RTCA 
Statement).
 Review agenda.
 Review and approval of summary from the last Plenary.
 Review proposed changes to DO-311A as a result of NTSB final 
report.
 Update DO-311A plan (WG meetings, Plenary schedule, Status of 
FRAC comments, PMC meeting)
 Adjourn to working group to disposition FRAC comments
 Review action items.

January 21st

 Review agenda, other actions.
 Adjourn to working group to disposition FRAC comments
 Review action items.

January 22nd

 Review agenda, other actions.
 Finalize plan/future meetings, if needed.
 Adjourn to working group to disposition FRAC comments
 Working Group Report
 Review action items.
 Approve DO-311A for submission to the PMC and final 
publication.
 Adjourn.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 16, 2014.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-29909 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0061 - EN

*|*

# 52007AP0061

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/49/EEC and Directives 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of shareholdings in the financial sector (COM(2006)0507 - C6-0298/2006 - 2006/0166(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 301 E , 13/12/2007 P. 0045 - 0045 *

P6_TA(2007)0061

Prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of shareholdings ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/49/EEC and Directives 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of shareholdings in the financial sector (COM(2006)0507 — C6-0298/2006 — 2006/0166(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0507) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 47(2) and 55 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0298/2006),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0027/2007),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Jon Garfield, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Clearant, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant is made known to me by others within the entity, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 14, 2007  By: /s/ Jon Garfield    JON GARFIELD    *Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer*
(Reap. Dec. 8680)

Entry Nos. CE 776042; CE 705657.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided October 10, 1956)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the items marked “A” and initialed YCS by Examiner V C. Schug on the invoices covered by the above-named reappraisement appeals consist of printed linen fabric exported from England.

> That when said above-mentioned items marked “A” and initialed by the Examiner were exported from England such and similar merchandise was not being freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of England, nor was it being freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of England for exportation to the United States, nor was it being freely offered for sale in the principal market of the United States to United States purchasers.

> That the “cost of production” as defined in Section 402 (f), Tariff Act of 1930, for the above-mentioned items marked “A” and initialed by the Examiner was as follows:

> Eor cost of materials, labor, and fabrication (Section 402 (f) (1) Tariff Act of 1930);

> Appeal Number Price Per Yard, Equivalent U. S. Dollars

> 205559-A $0.93 less £54/0/0 British sterling on extended total

> 206200-A $1.00 less £4/0/0 British sterling on extended total

> To the above prices there should be added 10% for usual general expenses (Section 402 (f) (2)); and then plus 5% and then plus 25% for profits (Section 402 (f) (4)). Said prices are net packed.

> That the testimony, exhibits and other evidence hereto submitted to the court by the parties hereto may be disregarded; said reappraisement appeals being submitted for decision upon the agreed facts set forth in this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise identified by the items marked *“A”*and initialed VCS by Examiner Y. C. Schug on the invoices, and that such values were as follows:

> *537Reappraisement 205559-A_The equivalent of $0.93 per yard, less 54.0.0

> English currency on the extended total

> Reappraisement 206200-A_The equivalent of $1.00 per yard, less 4.0.0

> English currency on the extended total

> Plus 10 per centum, then plus 5 per centum, then plus 25 per centum, on each of the foregoing, net packed

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise, they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Order filed April 3, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00760

- CR

____________ RAUL BAHENA , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15 52218



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the originals of State’s Exhibit 18 and
State’s Exhibit 19.The clerk of the 177th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this

court the original of State’s Ex hibit 18 and State’s Exhibit 19, on or before April 15, 2020. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe the original exhibits; to deliver them to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspect ion, to return the originals of State’s Exhibit 18
and State’s Exhibit 19.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan.
No. 53021.

#### Armour & Company *v.*United States,

protest 144587-K (Pembina).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of “ox gall concentrate,” the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
No. 53030.

#### Central Madeira Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 109810-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D. 239), the protests were dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------



              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, William E. Sanford, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1).     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934, as amended; and

         (2).     The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 10, 2003            By:  /s/ William E. Sanford
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        William E. Sanford
                                        Executive Vice President,
                                        Chief Financial Officer, and
                                        Secretary



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Interline Brands, Inc. and will be retained by Interline
Brands, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Before the First Division,

June 18, 1957

No. 60879.

#### Walter Hoffman et al. *v.*United States,

protests 973084-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) *544or *Prime Fur Corp.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, *supra,*the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

LISA LANDERS,

NO. CIV. S-04-1847 FCD/DAD

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.

BELL GAS & MINIMART, et al., 

Defendants.

______________________________/

----oo0oo----

On August 25, 2005 the court issued an Order to Show Cause

to plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Theodore A. Pinnock, regarding his

failures to respond to court orders. Mr. Pinnock was required to

file a response on or before September 9, 2005. 

On September 9, 2005 the court received Mr. Pinnock’s

response and pursuant to his representations contained therein

the court makes the following orders:

1. The Order to Show Cause hearing set for 

Case 2:04-cv-01847-FCD-DAD Document 10 Filed 09/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

September 23, 2005 is VACATED and the Order is DISCHARGED;

2. A status conference is set for Friday, 

November 18, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. A Joint Status Report shall be

filed on or before November 8, 2005. If a notice of dismissal

pursuant to settlement or other appropriate motion is filed prior

to the conference the court the status conference shall be

vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 13, 2005.

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01847-FCD-DAD Document 10 Filed 09/13/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

MONICA N. ANDERSON

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

DANIEL P. O’DONNELL, State Bar No. 177872

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 324-5810

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Carey and Guzman

SA2004104568

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

HAROLD ROBERTSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. GUZMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CIV S-04-1587 DFL GGH P

STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL OF ACTION

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-01587-DFL-GGH Document 24 Filed 12/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

2

THE PARTIES HEREBY VOLUNTARILY STIPULATE to the dismissal this action 

pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each party to bear his own

attorney's fees and costs.

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: _12/05/05__________ /s/ See attachment for signature 

HAROLD ROBERTSON, Plaintiff 

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: _12/08/05__________ /s/ Daniel P. O’Donnell 

DANIEL P. O’DONNELL

Attorney for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED, that this action shall be dismissed. 

DATED: 12/21/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________________________ 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE JUDGE

rob1587.stip.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-01587-DFL-GGH Document 24 Filed 12/22/05 Page 2 of 2
-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory L. Spallas – SBN 129306 

Kristi A. Nguyen – SBN 241201 

PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLP

650 California Street, 10th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94108 

Phone: (415) 278-9400 

Fax: (415) 278-9411 

Attorneys for Defendant 

WAL-MART STORES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUANITA MARTINDALE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., and DOES 1 

through 10, inclusive 

 

 Defendants. 

________________________________ ____ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:04-cv-1909-MCE-GGH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF 

TRIAL 

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES: 

Plaintiff JUANITA MARTINDALE and Defendant WAL-MART STORES, INC., by 

and through their respective attorneys of record, herein agree and stipulate to a continuance of 

the trial date as good cause exists for the continuance, as described below. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their attorneys of 

record that the trial date be continued for a date convenient to the Court after September 25, 

2006. Both parties are available for trial on the following dates: September 25, 2006 through 

October 20, 2006, and November 6, 2006 through November 22, 2006. The trial should last no 

longer than five to six days. 

The trial is currently set for July 12, 2006, with the pre-trial conference set for June 5, 

2006. The parties would like to engage in one final attempt to settle the matter and have 

scheduled a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Gregory Hollows for June 12, 2006, 

Case 2:04-cv-01909-MCE -GGH Document 12 Filed 05/01/06 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

his earliest available date. The pre-trial conference, however, is scheduled prior to the 

settlement conference. If the parties ultimately settle the matter on June 12, 2006, the June 5, 

2006 pre-trial conference and July 12, 2006 trial would be unnecessary. Thus, a continuance of 

the trial date would provide the parties an opportunity to engage in settlement discussions and 

possibly avoid unnecessary use of the Court’s time. 

Dated: April ___, 2006 PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLP 

 ___________________________________/S/ 

 By: Gregory L. Spallas 

 Kristi A. Nguyen 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 WAL-MART STORES, INC. 

Dated: April ___, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT JOHNSON 

 _________________________________ _/S/ 

 By: Scott Johnson 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 JUANITA MARTINDALE 

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial be continued to 

November 8, 2006 at 09:00 a.m. The pretrial conference is reset for September 18, 2006 at 

03:30 p.m. Parties shall file a joint pretrial statement on or before September 5, 2006. 

Dated: April 28, 2006

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01909-MCE -GGH Document 12 Filed 05/01/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL LOUTZENHISER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1937 LKK PAN P

vs.

ALVARO C. TRAQUINA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

November 2, 2005, defendant Franklin requested proceedings against him be

stayed in light of his October 14, 2005, Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition in the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio. 

////

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-01937-LKK -PAN Document 65 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, the court HEREBY ORDERS defendant Franklin’s November 2,

2005, request is granted and this action is STAYED as to claims against defendant Franklin only. 

DATED: January 3, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01937-LKK -PAN Document 65 Filed 01/04/06 Page 2 of 2