alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

June 26, 1941

No. 46126.

#### Protests 33591-K, etc., of Herbert Schatzki et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 42891.

#### Protest 733195-G of Lord & Taylor (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bottles chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. As they were plated with silver the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
No. 58576.

protests 227680-K and 212206-K (New York).

#### Teigh, Inc. *v.*United States,

*456Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Christmas tree ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Walco Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1445), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:04-cv-00472-LKK-GGH   Document 52    Filed 06/23/06   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-26T21:41:18-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

VICTOR S. HALTOM

Attorney at Law

State Bar No. 155157

428 J Street, Suite 350

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 444-8663

Facsimile: 444-1546

e-mail: vshjah@aol.com

Attorney for Petitioner

KEVIN B. JOHNSON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN B. JOHNSON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0892 DFL DAD P

vs.

JIM HAMLET, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s July 20, 2005 application for a third enlargement of time is

granted.

2. On or before August 22, 2005, petitioner shall file either a statement that he

will stand on his existing petition and supplemental points and authorities, or a motion for leave

to amend accompanied by a proposed amended petition and, if appropriate, a motion for a stay

pending exhaustion of additional claims.

DATED: July 22, 2005.

/john0892.ext3

Case 2:04-cv-00892-MCE -DAD Document 32 Filed 07/22/05 Page 1 of 1
#### Fenton Shaw *vs.*The Home Insurance Co.

Aroostook, ss.

Per curiam.

This is an action to recover on a policy of fire insurance. The defendant insured the one and one-half story frame building and additions structurally attached, with combustible roof covering, including foundations and all landlord’s fixtures thereto while therein or thereon as a part of the building, while used for dwelling purposes only $3,000;

Also

On frame building, including additions structurally attached with non-combustible roof covering and landlord’s fixtures thereto and known as Potato House #1 and attached to dwelling *#1*by ell $7,000.

Between the time the contracts of insurance were issued and the fire, the plaintiff altered the ell and the barn. The barn became a potato house. The ell was used as a milk separator room, and it was used to store utensils, and wood, and for a shed. It was also used as a garage for plaintiff’s automobile and the roof was raised and the west wall was extended. These changes cost at least $3,000; and the plaintiff also used the ell for the storage of spare parts, a drill, a press, and a welding machine.

The plaintiff did not notify the defendant of such remodeling before the fire; but there was no requirement that required him so to do. The damages on the ell, if there is to be any recovery at all, are not claimed to be excessive. The question is whether or not there can be any recovery as a matter of law for fire damage to the ell.

*454
      *George V. Blanchard,*for plaintiff.

*George B. Barnes,*for defendant.

The sole question is whether the ell was covered. Was it a question for the jury whether the ell was under the policy structurally attached to the house and used for dwelling house purposes only? That is a permissible interpretation of the contract of insurance and was for the jury to determine.

A standard policy of insurance such as this is prepared by the insurers and should be interpreted most strongly against the defendant. *Barnes*v. *Dirigo Mutual Fire Insurance Co.,*122 Me. 486; it is a question of fact for the jury. *Giberson*v. *York County Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 127*Me. 182. A literal construction of a fire insurance policy is not favored by the courts. *Bragdon*v. *Shapiro,*146 Me. 83. The words “structurally attached . . . and used for dwelling purposes only” are words of description and not words of prohibition on the use of the building.

The verdict is not against the evidence or weight of evidence.

*Motion denied.*

Sitting: Murchie, C. J., Thaxter, Fellows, Merrill, Nulty, Williamson, JJ.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-522 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Status of Forces 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and EL SALVADOR 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

San Salvador February 15, 2007 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
EL SALVADOR 

Defense: Status of Forces 

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 San Salvador February 15, 2007; 

 Entered into force May 22, 2007.
No. 46121.

#### Protests 732115-G, etc., of Kaufmann’s Dept. Stores, Inc. (Pittsburgh).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
No. 47878.

#### Protests 70512-K, etc., of Fred C. Reynolds, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Pacific Trading Co.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 221, C. D. 610) the frogs’ legs in question were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF            PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF            HYBRID DYNAMICS CORPORATION            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Leonard DuCharme, Chief Executive Officer of Hybrid Dynamics Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Company fully complies with the requirements of that section.                I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial operations and results of operations of the Company.

| Date:  November 14, 2006                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |
| By:  /s/ LEONARD DUCHARME     |
|                                    |
| Leonard DuCharme                                       |
| Principal Executive Officer                            |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 12 (the “Partnership”) for the quarters ended December 31, 2008, September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership’s general partner, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that such provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for the Partnership’s annual financial statements and except that the Report is a cumulative report covering each of the quarters ended December 31, September 30 and June 30, 2008 and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.











/s/Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.


Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.


Date: August 26, 2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID DANIEL CEPEDA,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1899 LKK JFM P

vs.

MENDOZA-POWERS, et al.,

 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 16, 2005, petitioner filed a motion

for a court order directing the Clerk of the Court to provide him with a copy of his second

amended petition, filed June 8, 2005, and the exhibits attached thereto. Exhibit D to the second

amended petition consists of two audiotapes, which cannot be copied or returned to petitioner by

the Clerk of the Court. In all other respects, the motion will be granted.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s June 16, 2005 motion is granted in part; and

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01899-LKK -JFM Document 38 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of his second

amended petition and the exhibits attached thereto except for Exhibit D. 

DATED: August 29, 2005.

12

cepe1899.cpy

Case 2:04-cv-01899-LKK -JFM Document 38 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 58063.

protests 192923-K, etc. (Boston).

#### Francis Willey & Co., Division of Winslow Bros. & Smith Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content under T. D. 53159” in the schedule of protests attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
#### William Neal *versus*Israel Washburn, Jr.

To render tile indorser of a writ liable for costs recovered, the inability or avoidance of the original plaintiff should bo shown by an officer’s return thereof on an execution for costs, issued within one year from the time the judgment was rendered.

*Wilson,*for the plaintiff.

*Washburn, pro se,*

cited *Ruggles*v. *Ives,*6 Mass. R. 494, and *Wilson*v. *Chase,*20 Maine R. 385.

The opinion of the Court was by

Shepley J.

This is a writ of *scire facias*against the defendant as indorser of a writ in favor of R. M. N. Smyth and others against the plaintiff, who recovered a judgment against them Tor costs, on July 3, 1840. Execution issued thereon September 20, 1840, but it does not appear to have been in the hands of an officer for service. It was returned in no part satisfied, and an alias execution issued on August 3, 1841, on which Smyth was arrested on October 1, 1841; and released upon giving a bond according to the provisions of the statute.

It has been decided, that the party must be considered as guilty of laches, if he does not show, that the return of the officer, upon which he would rely to charge an indorser of a writ, was duly made upon an execution issued within one year after judgment. *Wilson*v. *Chase,*20 Maine R. 385. The plaintiff in this case fails to establish that, fact, and the indorser is discharged.

*Exceptions overruled.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of National Realty and Mortgage,
Inc. (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of the Company, for purposes of
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

January 12, 2006
                                            By: /s/ RICHARD ASTROM
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                Richard Astrom
                                                Chief Executive Officer

January 12, 2006
                                            By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Christopher Astrom
                                               Chief Financial Officer
No. 54660.

#### Advanced Ring Manufacturers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 141944-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those-the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
No. 62588.

#### S. Rosenberg Co. *v.*United States,

protest 328915-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
(Reap. Dec. 10432)

#### Davies, Turner & Co. et al. *v*United States

Entry No. 15526, etc.

(Decided January 16, 1963)

*Sharretts, Paley & darter*for the plaintiffs.

*Joseph D. Chiilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise which is the subject of the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of phonograph records exported from Mexico after January 1, 1959'.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that phonograph records are not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and are subject to appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of *375whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the prices shown on Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the phonograph records in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the prices shown on schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 64167.

protest 59/25548 (New York).

#### Sumitomo Shoji, New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion of

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
#### Samuel T. Stangl et al., Appellants, v Compass Transportation et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[635 NYS2d 556]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Matter of Eric D.*[appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sprague, J.—Negligence.) Present—Denman, P. J., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD ROY MILLER, 

Petitioner, No. CIV-S-04-2446 DFL KJM P

vs.

A.K. SCRIBNER, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 27, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-02446-JKS Document 28 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 27, 2006, are adopted in

full; and

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted and petitioner is given leave to file

an amended petition containing only exhausted claims. Any amended petition should be filed

within thirty days of the date of this order. 

DATED: 3/29/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02446-JKS Document 28 Filed 03/30/06 Page 2 of 2
1

Chappell, Regina

From: Sasser, Erika

Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:41 PM

To: Szabo, Aaron; Frey, Nathan J.

Cc: Henigin, Mary; Chappell, Regina; Corrales, Mark; Cooperstein, Sharon; Orlin, David; Hemby, 

James; Rush, Alan; Stewart, Lori; Koerber, Mike; South, Peter; Weatherhead, Darryl; 

Langdon, Robin; Hetes, Bob; Kopits, Elizabeth

Subject: Part of EO12866 and 13563: Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone 

(RIN 2060-AP38)-- RIA (Clean)

Attachments: EO12866-O3-NAAQS-RIN2060-AP38-RIA-FINAL_20150929.docx

Attached please find the clean version of the final O3 NAAQS RIA reflecting changes made in response to interagency

comments. Please let me know if there are any questions about these materials.  

Thank you,

Erika
1

Chappell, Regina

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:55 PM

To: Sasser, Erika; Frey, Nathan J.

Cc: Henigin, Mary; Chappell, Regina; Corrales, Mark; Cooperstein, Sharon; Orlin, David; Hemby, 

James; Rush, Alan; Stewart, Lori; Koerber, Mike; South, Peter; Weatherhead, Darryl; 

Langdon, Robin; Hetes, Bob; Kopits, Elizabeth

Subject: RE: Part of EO12866 and 13563: Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for 

Ozone (RIN 2060-AP38)-- RIA (Clean)

Thanks Erika.  Just to confirm, I have received all 3 emails with attachments.

From: Sasser, Erika [mailto:Sasser.Erika@epa.gov]  

Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:41 PM

To: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>; Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Henigin, Mary <Henigin.Mary@epa.gov>; Chappell, Regina <Chappell.Regina@epa.gov>; Corrales, Mark

<Corrales.Mark@epa.gov>; Cooperstein, Sharon <Cooperstein.Sharon@epa.gov>; Orlin, David <Orlin.David@epa.gov>;

Hemby, James <Hemby.James@epa.gov>; Rush, Alan <Rush.Alan@epa.gov>; Stewart, Lori <Stewart.Lori@epa.gov>;

Koerber, Mike <Koerber.Mike@epa.gov>; South, Peter <South.Peter@epa.gov>; Weatherhead, Darryl

<Weatherhead.Darryl@epa.gov>; Langdon, Robin <Langdon.Robin@epa.gov>; Hetes, Bob <Hetes.Bob@epa.gov>;

Kopits, Elizabeth <Kopits.Elizabeth@epa.gov>

Subject: Part of EO12866 and 13563: Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone (RIN 2060‐AP38)‐‐ RIA

(Clean)

Attached please find the clean version of the final O3 NAAQS RIA reflecting changes made in response to interagency

comments. Please let me know if there are any questions about these materials.  

Thank you,

Erika
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

              [RYDER SCOTT COMPANY/PETROLEUM ENGINEERS LETTERHEAD]


                         CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY


     We consent to the use on the form 10-KSB of PrimeEnergy Corporation of our
reserve report and all schedules, exhibits, and attachments thereto incorporated
by reference of Form 10-KSB and to any reference made to us on Form 10-KSB as a
result of such incorporation.

                                                       Very Truly Yours,

                                                       /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                                       RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                                       PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



Denver, Colorado
March 10, 1998