alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended  November 30, 2003 (the "Report") by
Advanced Media, Inc. ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.




April 14, 2004                           By:   /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                               --------------------------
                                               Buddy Young
                                               Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                               Financial Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4649 

To amend the Mutual Security Act of 1954 by declaring that if all NATO 

countries consent to the accession of Ukraine to NATO membership, 

the United States will have grounds for withdrawing from the North 

Atlantic Treaty. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2024 

Mr. LEE (for himself and Mr. TUBERVILLE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To amend the Mutual Security Act of 1954 by declaring 

that if all NATO countries consent to the accession 

of Ukraine to NATO membership, the United States 

will have grounds for withdrawing from the North Atlantic Treaty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4649 IS

1 SECTION 1. GROUNDS FOR IMMEDIATE WITHDRAWAL OF 

2 THE UNITED STATES FROM NORTH ATLANTIC 

3 TREATY IF ALL NATO COUNTRIES CONSENT 

4 TO UKRAINE BEGINNING THE NATO ACCES5 SION PROCESS. 

6 Section 408 of the Mutual Security Act of 1954 (22 

7 U.S.C. 1928) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(d) GROUNDS FOR IMMEDIATE WITHDRAWAL.—If 

10 the North Atlantic Treaty Organization provides unani11 mous consent for Ukraine to begin the accession process, 

12 such action shall be grounds for the immediate withdrawal 

13 by the United States from the North Atlantic Treaty in 

14 accordance with Article 13 of the North Atlantic Treaty.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(Reap. Dec. 9503)

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 6036, etc.

(Decided September 15, 1959)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*George Oochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to *488various items of Chinese merchandise that were entered at the port of San Francisco, Calif.

The case is before us on a stipulation of submission wherein counsel. for the respective parties have agreed that the issues involved in these appeals for reappraisement “are the same in all material respects as the issue involved in *Meier & Frank Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9057,” the record in which case was incorporated herein by consent. In the cited case, this court held that compensation, paid to an agent of an importer for services in buying merchandise, receiving the goods after they have been manufactured and finished, comparing them with samples, procuring cases, and attending to the packing and shipping, is a buying commission and, as such, is a nondutiable charge.

On an agreed set of facts embodied in the stipulation of submission, and following the cited decision on the law, I hold export value, as such value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1980, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and that such statutory value is “the appraised values less the amount added under duress by reason of Section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930.”

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), I, Michael E. Hart, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

|Date: March 14, 2005 |  | /s/MICHAEL E. HARTMichael E. Hart
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. This certification "accompanies" the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-527 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CIVIL AVIATION 

Transport Services 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and KUWAIT 

Signed at Kuwait August 30, 2006 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 KUWAIT 

Civil Aviation: Transport Services 

 Agreement signed at Kuwait 

 August 30, 2006; 

 Entered into force May 27, 2007. 

 With annexes.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-501 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MONTENEGRO 

Signed at Washington May 1, 2007 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MONTENEGRO 

Defense: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Washington May 1, 2007; 

 Entered into force May 1, 2007. 




NOTE: In Article IX, first paragraph, third sentence, the fifteenth word should read "States".
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GREGORY BRYAN RUSH,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50419

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00607-PA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 6, 2012** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Gregory Bryan Rush appeals from the lifetime term of supervised release

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of child pornography,

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

FILED

MAR 09 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-50419

§ 1291, and we vacate and remand.

The government contends that this appeal should be dismissed in light of the

appeal waiver set forth in Rush’s plea agreement. We decline to apply the appeal

waiver because the language concerning the supervised release term is ambiguous,

and so the waiver does not preclude our review. See United States v. Cope, 527

F.3d 944, 950-51 (9th Cir. 2008).

Rush contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to provide

an explanation for imposing a lifetime term of supervised release. Because the

district court did not explain its decision to impose a lifetime term of supervised

release, or its rationale for the lifetime supervised release term, we vacate the

supervised release term and remand for further sentencing proceedings. See United

States v. Hammons, 558 F.3d 1100, 1103-05 (9th Cir. 2009) (failure to provide any

reasons for sentence imposed constituted reversible plain error).

In light of the foregoing, we do not reach Rush’s contention that the lifetime

term of supervised release is substantively unreasonable.

VACATED and REMANDED.
# C_2008120EN.01004901.xml

| 16.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/49

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movements of pet animals as regards the extension of the transitional period’

COM(2007) 572 final — 2007/0202 COD

(2008/C 120/12)

On 23 October 2007, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Articles 37 and 152 (4 (b)) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movements of pet animals as regards the extension of the transitional period.

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movements of pet animals as regards the extension of the transitional period.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 1411/2000, adopted on 29 November 2000 (1), it decided, at its 440th plenary session, held on 12 and 13 December 2007 (meeting of 12 December), by 131 votes with 4 abstentions to issue an opinion endorsing the proposal and to refer to the position it had taken in the abovementioned document.

1

Brussels, 12 December 2007.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---

(1)  OJ C 116 of 20.4.2001, p. 54-56.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7499

EARL PAUGH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT E. WARD, Warden, Evans Correctional

Center; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General,

State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-2065-4-12BE)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 4, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl Paugh, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Paugh v. Ward, No. CA-96-2065-4-12BE (D.S.C. Sept. 30,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 55931.

protests 164446-K, etc. (New York).

#### B. & F. Antique Silver, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Delonzo Gallon,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-2422 MCE PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

D. L. Runnels, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoJune 3, 2005, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for

failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted,

explained the deficiencies and allowed plaintiff 45 days to file

an amended complaint correcting them. The 45-day period now has

expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, I hereby recommend that this action be

dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be

granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

Case 2:04-cv-02422-MCE -PAN Document 5 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: August 30, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02422-MCE -PAN Document 5 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 52042.

#### W. R. Zanes & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 94525-K and 102513-K (Galveston).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

From the evidence it was found that the collector, after correctly calculating the amount of paper stock rags in pounds in the items the subject of the said prior decisions, deducted the total so ascertained from the total net weight of the shipments, and assessed duty at 3 cents per pound on this difference, thus, in effect, assessing duty on merchandise which he had originally passed free as paper stock and which was not the Subject of the court’s prior *173decisions. The protests were therefore sustained, except as to the claim that 22)4 percent paper stock should have been allowed on 10,002 pounds in 20 bales marked B (entry 5-D, protest 94525-K), and the collector was directed to reliquidate in accordance with the amended judgment.
exhibit04_16.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing



  





 



Summary of the Sixth Amendment to the Agreement to Supply Sugarcane, entered into by BrasilAgro and Brenco on May 8, 2015, in connection with Fazenda Alto Taquari


Parties: Brasilagro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas and Brenco – Companhia Brasileira de Energia Renovável


Purpose:  


(i)                  To modify the way of supplying, fixing the volume of sugar cane to be delivered to Brenco, as follows:


 




	

   

	

   HARVEST
	

   PRODUCTION

	

   2015/2016
	

   239,958
	

   tons of sugarcane

	

   2016/2017
	

   224,714
	

   tons of sugarcane

	

   2017/2018
	

   216,713
	

   tons of sugarcane

	

   2018/2019
	

   223,045
	

   tons of sugarcane

	

   2019/2020
	

   239,544
	

   tons of sugarcane

	

   2020/2021
	

   272,257
	

   tons of sugarcane

	

   2021/2022
	

   244,649
	

   tons of sugarcane





 


 


 


(ii)                To grant full, general, irrevocable and irreversible discharge, from one Party to another Party .


 


All other provisions which have not been expressly altered by the Sixth Amendment remained ratified.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4578]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,568]


Fiberweb (Reemay, Inc.), Bethune, SC; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 
2813), the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance on January 17, 2007, applicable to workers of Fiberweb, 
Inc., Bethune, South Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on February 7, 2007 (72 FR 5748).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce 
nonwoven textile fabric. The State reports that the subject firm's 
employee wages are reported under the Unemployment Insurance (UI) 
account for Reemay, Inc.
    The Department has learned through follow-up with a company 
official that the firm's name is Fiberweb and Reemay, Inc. is the 
affiliated entity that processes the payroll.
    It is the Department's intent of the certification to include all 
workers of the subject firm adversely affected by increased imports of 
nonwoven textiles. Accordingly, the Department is amending the 
certification to include workers of the subject firm whose wages are 
reported under the company name, Reemay, Inc.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,568 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Fiberweb (Reemay, Inc.), Bethune, South Carolina, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after December 8, 2005 through January 17, 2009, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade 
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 1st day of March 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-4578 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# C_2007153EN.01002201.xml

| 6.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/22

---

Update of reference amounts for the crossing of the external borders, as referred to in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) as published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 247 of 13 October 2006, p. 19

Official Journal of the European Union

(2007/C 153/06)

The publication of reference amounts for the crossing of the external borders, as referred to in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the commission in conformity with Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code.

In addition to the publication in the OJ, a monthly update is available on the website of Directorate General Justice, Freedom and Security.

FRANCE:

Replacement of the information published in Official Journal of the European Union C 247 of 13 Ocotber 2006.

Replacement of the information published in Official Journal of the European Union C 247 of 13 Ocotber 2006.

The reference amount for adequate means of subsistence for the planned duration of an alien's stay or for his transit via France to a destination in a third State is equal to the amount of the guaranteed minimum wage in France (SMIC) calculated daily on the basis of the rate fixed on 1 January of the current year.

This amount is regularly reassessed on the basis of the French cost of living index:

| — | automatically whenever the retail price index rises more than 2 %, |
| --- | --- |

—

automatically whenever the retail price index rises more than 2 %,

| — | by a government decision — after consultation with the national commission for collective bargaining — to grant a rise higher than the rise in the retail price index. |
| --- | --- |

—

by a government decision — after consultation with the national commission for collective bargaining — to grant a rise higher than the rise in the retail price index.

As of 1 July 2005, the daily amount of the SMIC (minimum wage) is EUR 56,20.

Persons holding proof of accommodation (attestation d'accueil) must possess a minimum amount of money, equivalent to half the SMIC, in order to stay in France. This amount is therefore EUR 28,10 per day.

---
No. 50087.

#### Protests 80106-K, etc., of Coty Processing Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 49387, the claim at 50 cents per pound and 40 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1539 (b) was sustained.
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 00 8 6 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. LUKE STROMMEN ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including August 3 1 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 22 2022

07/22/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0086