alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael J. Grebe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1).  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2).  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: May 6, 2004                   By: /s/ Michael J. Grebe
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Michael J. Grebe
                                        President and Chief Executive
                                        Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interline Brands, Inc. and will be retained by Interline Brands,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                      -31-
No. 61871.

#### Ben S. Armstrong et al. *v.*United States,

protests 179503-K, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Border Brokerage Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 61895.

#### The American Fabrics Company *v.*United States,

protest 28750-K (Bridgeport).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Order entered July 1 6 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00555
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.S., CHILDREN On Appeal from the County Court at Law Kaufman County, Te xas Trial Court Cause No. 104418
- CC

O RDER Before the Court is court reporter Shelly L. Crossland’s July 12, 2021 request for a thirty

- day extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the record be filed no later than A ugust 18, 2021. Because this is an accelerated appeal in a parental termination case , further extensions will not be granted absent extraordinary circumstances and the trial court must arrange for a substitute reporter, if necessary , to ensure the timely filing of the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 28.4(b)(1),(2).We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the

Honorable Tracy Gray, Presiding Judge of Kaufman County Court at Law, Ms. Crossland, and the parties.
/s/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUS TICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES M. GIBSON,

DARLENE EARLY,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-04-2348 DFL DAD PS

vs.

GEORGE W. BUSH, 

JOHN KERRY,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On December 14, 2004, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiffs and which contained notice to plaintiffs that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. On January 26,

2005, the findings and recommendations were re-served on both plaintiffs at their last known

address. Plaintiff Charles Gibson filed objections to the findings and recommendations on

January 3, 2005. No objections were filed by plaintiff Darlene Early.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case and has considered plaintiff’s

Case 2:04-cv-02348-DFL-DAD Document 9 Filed 06/17/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. The court has

determined that there is no need to modify the findings and recommendations based on the points

raised in plaintiff’s objections.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2004, are adopted in

full; and

2. Plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction.

DATED: 6/10/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02348-DFL-DAD Document 9 Filed 06/17/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 46170.

#### Protests 29850-K, etc., of Reginald G. Norton et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

An examination of the papers disclosing no reason for disturbing the collector’s decision, the protests were dismissed following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02
- 13
- 00048
- CV

PHILIP HAMILTON APPELLANT

V.
KENNETH SHIELDS APPELLEE

---------- FROM THE 141 ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Philip Hamilton filed his brief with this court on May 20, 2013. Among other defects, Hamilton’s brief was deficient under subsections (a), (d), (g), (h), (i), and (k ) of rule 38.1 and subsections (e), (h), and (i)(3) of rule 9.4.
See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(e), (h), (i)(3), 38.1(a), (d), (g), (h), (i), (k). On May 20, 2013, this court instructed Hamilton to file an amended brief by May 30, 2013, to cure the defects. Th e court’s letter notified Hamilton that failure

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

to file an amended brief in compliance with the rules identified therein “may result in striking the brief you filed, waiver of noncomplying points, or dismissal of the appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3. Hamilton has not filed an
amended brief. 2
Although only “substantial compliance” with the briefing rules is required,

see Tex. R. App. P. 38.9, if we determine that the briefing rules have been “flagrantly violated,” we may require the app ellant to amend, supplement, or redraw his brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). If the appellant does not file another brief that complies with the rules of appellate procedure, we may strike the brief, prohibit the party from filing another, and proceed as i f the party had failed to file
a brief. Id. Because Hamilton has been given notice of the defects in his brief , and
because he has failed to cure those defects, we strike his brief and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8 (a)(1), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: July 11 , 2013

2 On May 30, 2013, Hamilton filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief, which this court d enied. Because Hamilton had not filed an amended brief, on June 18, 2013, we notified him for a second time that the appeal could be dismissed. Hamilton responded to our second notice, but his response does not reasonably explain the failure to file a br ief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial infomation extracted from the contained
quarterly 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                                1
       
<S>                                               <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                    AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                              1,047,979
<SECURITIES>                                          137,721
<RECEIVABLES>                                         461,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    2,709,738
<PP&E>                                             49,869,521
<DEPRECIATION>                                     21,628,465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     41,374,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,626,593
<BONDS>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                            2,178,297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                         27,881,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       41,374,924
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   11,881,859
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    8,451,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    812,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        1,050,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 1,837,733
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                        1,837,733
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.00
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21


                               XANSER CORPORATION
                                 SUBSIDIARY LIST


XANSER CORPORATION (formerly Kaneb Services, Inc.)
Corporate Insurers Ltd
Xtria LLC (formerly Fields Financial Services, Inc.)
Double Eagle Cabling and Communications LLC
National Asset Information Services, Inc.
CPIA, Inc.
Viata Corporation
Kaneb Financial Corporation (formerly Asset Based Lenders, Inc.)
Furmanite Equipment Leasing Company LLC (formerly Kaneb Equipment
    Leasing Company)
Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. (formerly Kaneb International, Inc.)
Furmanite America Inc.
Furmanite Offshore Services, Inc.
Furmanite Technology LLC
Furmanite Malaysia LLC
Specialty Industrial Services Sdn. Bhd.
Furmanite (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Furmanite Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Denon Pty Ltd)
Furmanite NZ Limited (formerly Furmanite V&P Eng. Ltd, formerly V & P Eng. Ltd)
Furmanite Holding AS
Furmanite AS (Norway)
CMS:  Corrision Monitoring Services AS
Furmanite SA
Furmanite NV
Metalock NV (Belgium)
Furmeta Holding BV
Metaholding BV
Metalock BV
Furmanite BV
Furmanite East Asia Limited (Hong Kong) Furmanite Singapore PTE Limited
Furmanite Limited (formerly Kaneb UK plc) Furmanite 1986 Limited Furmanite
International Limited Furmanite Germany, Inc.
Management Services Furmanite Holding GmbH
Furmanite Technische Dienstleisfungen GmbH (formerly Zweipack GmbH)
Furmanite Industrie Service GmbH
Exhibit 10.1










CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-110652, 333-137102 and 333-153419) of Partner Communications Company Ltd., of our report dated March 18, 2013, relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.




Tel-Aviv, Israel

March 18, 2013
Kesselman & Kesselman

Certified Public Accountants (lsr.)

A member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited




Kesselman & Kesselman, Trade Tower, 25 Hamered Street, Tel-Aviv 68125, Israel,
 P.O Box 50005 Tel-Aviv 61500  Telephone: +972 -3- 7954555, Fax:+972 -3- 7954556, www.pwc.com/il
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 12, 2022 No. 04-22-00124-CV IN THE INTEREST OF P.R.D., A CHILD From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA02325 Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights. The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. T EX . R. J UD . A DMIN . 6.2. Accordingly, this appeal is required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed. Id. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on April 11, 2022. On April 11, 2022, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file the brief. We ORDER that appellant’s brief must be filed no later than May 2, 2022. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, no further extensions of time will be allowed.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of April, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4803 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4803

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 31143 State Highway 65 in Pengilly, Minnesota, as the ``First 
              Lieutenant Richard Arne Koski Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT RICHARD ARNE KOSKI POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 31143 State Highway 65 in Pengilly, Minnesota, shall be 
known and designated as the ``First Lieutenant Richard Arne Koski Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Lieutenant Richard Arne Koski Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate December 19 (legislative day, December 
      16), 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
 118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4803

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 31143 State Highway 65 in Pengilly, Minnesota, as the ``First 
              Lieutenant Richard Arne Koski Post Office''.
```
Before the Second Division,

August 10, 1944

No. 49664.

#### Petition 6366-R of J. Schoeneman, Inc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Kjncheloe, J.'

It was found from examination of the record that the entry of the merchandise at a less value than found upon final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States, or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4574]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-59,946]


International Textile Group, New York Sales Office Which Is 
Comprised of Burlington Worldwide, Burlington House, Cone Denim, New 
York, NY; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on September 14, 2006, applicable to workers of 
International Textile Group, New York Sales Office, New York, New York. 
The notice was published in the Federal Register on September 26, 2006 
(71 FR 56171).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in the sales of textiles produced at affiliated manufactories.
    Information from the State shows that workers separated from 
employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under separate 
unemployment insurance (UI) tax accounts for International Textile 
Group, New York Sales Office which is comprised of Burlington 
Worldwide, Burlington House and Cone Denim.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-59,946 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of the International Textile Group, New York Sales 
Office which is comprised on Burlington Worldwide, Burlington House 
and Cone Denim, New York, New York, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after August 16, 2005 through 
September 14, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 and are also eligible to 
apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance under Section 246 
of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of March 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-4574 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Listof Subsidiaries**

 

1.Witness Systems, LLC

 

*2.*Witness Systems Canada, Inc.

 

*3.*Witness Systems Pty Limited

 

*4.*Witness Systems, S.A. de C.V.

 

*5.*Witness Systems Services, S.A. de C.V.

 

*6.*Witness Systems, K.K

 

*7.*Witness Systems Limited

 

*8.*Witness Systems (Singapore) PTE Limited

 

*9.*Witness Systems (Malaysia) SDN. BHD.

 

*10.*Witness Systems Deutschland GmbH

 

*11.*Witness Systems HK Limited

 

*12.*Witness Systems Software Hardware EServico Do Brasil Ltda

 

*13.*WS Holdings Limited

 

*14.*Witness Systems Software (India) PrivateLimited

 

*15.*Blue Pumpkin Software, LLC

 

16. Blue Pumpkin Software Gmbh

 

17. Blue Pumpkin SoftwareIsrael Ltd

 

18. Blue Pumpkin Software UKlimited

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

# ACTION:

Notice of intent to enter into an enhanced-use lease. 

# SUMMARY:

The Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) intends to enter into an enhanced-use lease of approximately 0.46 acres including a 6,000-square foot building at the VA Medical Center (VAMC) in Butler, Pennsylvania. The selected lessee would develop, finance, construct, manage, maintain and operate a transitional residential homeless program. The lessee also would be required to provide VA with in-kind consideration consisting of construction and improvement work on the VAMC campus and services relating to shelter, job preparation, and referrals for health care programs needs. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Hackman, Office of Asset Enterprise Management (004B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-5875. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Title 38 U.S.C. section 8161                     *et seq.*                     specifically provides that the Secretary may enter into an enhanced-use lease if he determines that the implementation of a business plan proposed by the Under Secretary for Health for applying the consideration under such a lease to the provision of medical care and services would result in a demonstrable improvement of services to eligible veterans in the geographic service-delivery area within which the property is located. This project meets this requirement.                 

Approved: February 27, 2007. 

R. James Nicholson, 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

 [FR Doc. E7-4001 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
No. 51426.

#### Protests 66011-K, etc., of International Paper Sales Co., Inc., et al. (Mobile).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Plaintiffs state that the maximum thickness of the paper under consideration, after deducting the 5 percent tolerance permitted by T. D. 45418 (4), results in a thickness of 56/10000ths of an inch in excess of .004 of an inch prescribed in T. D. 44317, and argue that this trifling difference should be disregarded under the principle *de minimus non curat lex.*Plaintiffs rely *222on Abstract 47893, but in the present instance, apart from three laboratory reports received in evidence, no showing whatever was made that the paper of the thickness here in question is of the kind and class known and chiefly used as newsprint paper at the time of the enactment of the Tariff Act of 1930. Nor have the plaintiffs furnished any basis for holding the excess thickness of the paper as trifling and negligible under the principle *de minimus non curat lex.*The protests were overruled for lack of proof, following *United States*v. *Tower & Sons*(26 C. C. P. A. 1, T. D. 49534).