alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of National Residential Properties, Inc.
(the "COMPANY") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the SEC on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I hereby certify, in my capacity
as an officer of the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ RICHARD ASTROM
----------------------
Richard Astrom
Chief Executive Officer
January 8, 2004



In connection with the annual report of National Residential Properties, Inc.
(the "COMPANY") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the SEC on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I hereby certify, in my capacity
as an officer of the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
----------------------
Christopher Astrom
Chief Financial Officer
January 8, 2004













                                       50
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-726.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Bases 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Signed at Osan Air Base July 26, 2007 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

 Defense: Bases 

 Memorandum of understanding signed 

 July 26, 2007 at Osan Air Base; 

 Entered into force July 26, 2007. 




Note: At the present time, the Treaty Office does not have the Korean text of this Memorandum of Understanding. If the Korean text becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONON ALSTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2374 DFL JFM P

vs.

M. SANCHEZ, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 28, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02374-DFL -JFM Document 37 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 28, 2006 are adopted in full;

and 

2. Defendants’ February 6, 2006 motion for summary judgment is granted.

DATED: 9/29/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02374-DFL -JFM Document 37 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00215- CV
Lenny Acevedo, Appellant

v. F ederal Nat ional Mortgage A ssociation a/k /a F anni e Mae , Appellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 2 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY NO. C-1 -CV- 15- 0008 69, H ONO RAB LE ERIC SH EP P ERD, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R P ER CURIAM

Appellant L enny Ace vedo’s application for emer g ency temporar y re s training order , seeking to stay execution of the writ of possession order ed by the county court at law on May 1, 2015, is denied.

I t is ordere d on May

7, 2015.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and B ourland
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,



As Adopted Pursuant To



Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002



I, Fouad Kallamni, Principal Executive
and Accounting Officer of Premier Beverage Group Corp. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | • | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ Fouad Kallamni

Fouad Kallamni

President

(Principal Executive and financial Officer)

May 14, 2014
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN ADAMS, No. 2:04-cv-2474-MCE-GGH-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

TERESA SCHWARTZ, et al., 

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On January 31, 2006, the magistrate judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any Objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. 

Case 2:04-cv-02474-MCE -GGH Document 18 Filed 03/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Neither party has filed Objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 31, 2006

are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant’s June 2, 2005 Motion to Dismiss is denied, to

the extent that Defendant seeks dismissal with prejudice.

DATED: March 16, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02474-MCE -GGH Document 18 Filed 03/17/06 Page 2 of 2
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-814 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ALGERIA 

Signed at Algiers January 18, 2006 

 

 

 with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ALGERIA 

Scientific Cooperation 

 

 Agreement signed at Algiers January 18, 2006; 

 Entered into force August 14, 2007. 

 With annexes.
No. 47399.

#### Protest 69188-K of Le Page Co. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial counsel for the plaintiff offered in evidence the^entry in the case and submitted upon the record. From an examination of the papers the total weight was found to be 13,500 pounds. However, an allowance being made in the weight for breakage of 17 bottles, or 16 pounds, produced a total of 13,484 pounds. The protest was therefore overruled.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-58,442] 

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on January 25, 2006, applicable to workers of Weyerhaeuser Company, Large Log Mill, Aberdeen, Washington. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 10, 2006 (71 FR 7077).                 

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The Department limited the certification coverage to only workers of the Large Log Mill of the subject firm. New corrected information revealed that the Aberdeen, Washington location of Weyerhaeuser Company operates as a fully integrated work site and that the workers are not separately identifiable by product or location at the production complex. 

The intent of the Department's certification is to cover all workers manufacturing softwood dimensional lumber at Weyerhaeuser Company, Aberdeen, Washington, who were adversely affected by increased customer imports. 

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification determination to properly reflect this matter. 

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-58,442 is hereby issued as follows:
    - All workers of Weyerhaeuser Company, Aberdeen, Washington, who became totally or partially separated from employment on after November 21, 2004, through January 25, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade Adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1997.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of January 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7-4061 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

COREY L. MATHEWS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-381

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 22, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Brian Iten, Judge.

Corey L. Mathews, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

MORRIS, SLEET, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
### K18-2-310.01. Re,llorting 2eqeirements

A. 

### The owner or onerator of anv source shall ieport to the Director anv emissions in excess of the limits establislied bv tnis Chanter or the apnitcable permit The report shall be in 2 parts as snecified below I. 

### Notification bv telenhone or facsimile within 24 hours of the time the owner or operator first learned of the occur rence of excess emissions that includes all avatlable tnformation from subsection (B) 2. 

### Detailed written notification bv submission of an excess emissions reaort within 72 hours of the notification under subsection (11.

~ 

### The excess emissions report shall contain the following information• 1. The identitv of each stack or other emission point where the excess emissions occurred 2. The magnttude of the excess emissions exoressed in the units of the applicable emission limitation and the operating data and calculattons used in determintngthe magnitude of the excess emissions 3. The time and duration or exnected duration of the excess emis ions 4. The identity of the eyuipment from which the excess emissions emanated: 

### 5. The nature and cause of the emissions

6. The steps t 

### aken if the excess emissions were the result of a malfiinction to remedv the malfuncti on and 

### the stens taken or planned to prevent the recurrence of the malfunctions:

7. The steps that were or are being taken to limit the excess emissions: and

8. If the sour 

### ce's permit containsTrocedures eoverning source operation durine periods of s tartu 

### p or malfunction and

the excess em 

### i ss 

### ions resulted from startup or malfunction a 1 st_t of the steps taken to complv with the permit nrocedures. C. In the case of continuous or recurring excess emissions the notifi ation re uirements gf this Section shall be satisfied if
the source 12ro 

### vides the required notification after excess emissions are first detected an d includes in the_ 

### notification an estimate of the time the excess emissions will continue Excess emtssions occurrine after the estimated time period or changes in the nature of the emissions as ori i g nallv aeported shall reauire additional notification pursuant to subsections 

### (A) and (B).
No. 55274.

#### Ameren Trading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 150546-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 59036.

protest 247053-K (New York).

#### Robert & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the protest was overruled.
No. 53594.

petition 6584-R (Galveston).

#### W. R. Zanes and Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

When the case was called for hearing it was submitted on the record. In the absence of any proof to support the allegations contained in the petition, the same was denied.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-1128.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 

Signed at Washington November 22, 2005 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 

Defense: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Washington November 22, 2005; 

 Entered into force November 28, 2006.
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

 Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 12, 2016

Order 

August 12, 2016

151051(74)(76)(78)

CITY OF COLDWATER,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 151051

COA: 320181

Branch CC: 13-040185-CZ

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the separate motions of the Michigan Electric

Cooperative Association and the Michigan Public Service Commission for leave to file 

briefs amicus curiae are GRANTED. The amicus briefs submitted by those respective 

organizations on January 8, 2016, and August 5, 2016, are accepted for filing. On further 

order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Public Service Commission, 

through its attorneys in the Michigan Attorney General’s office, to have ten minutes of 

oral argument time in addition to that of the parties is DENIED.
No. 59011.

protests 232196-K, 247558-K, and 241951-K (New York).

#### Donalds, Ltd., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the holders of the vapex inhalers are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Donalds Ltd., Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 310, C. D. 1619), it was held that the holders are not subject to the additional duties under section 504, and the said holders, together with their containers, are properly dutiable at 12)4 percent under paragraph 5, as modified, *supra.*
# C_2007016EN.01000501.xml

| 24.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/5

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2007/C 16/06)

| 1. | As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below. |
| --- | --- |

1.

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Division B-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

| 4. | This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995. |
| --- | --- |

4.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Polyester staple fibres | Belarus | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1799/2002 (OJ L 274, 11.10.2002, p. 1) extended by the same regulation to polyester filament tow originating in Belarus | 12.10.2007 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Polyester staple fibres

Belarus

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1799/2002 (OJ L 274, 11.10.2002, p. 1) extended by the same regulation to polyester filament tow originating in Belarus

12.10.2007

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

1

(2)  Telefax : (32-2) 295 65 05.

2

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT COREY L. MATHEWS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-381 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed November 22, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Brian Iten, Judge. Corey L. Mathews, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
MORRIS, SLEET, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Case 2:04-cv-02004-RRB -KJM   Document 35    Filed 06/07/06   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-02004-RRB -KJM   Document 35    Filed 06/07/06   Page 2 of 2