alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4583 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to extend the authority 

of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue priority review 

vouchers to encourage treatments for rare pediatric diseases. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2024 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. BROWN, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

extend the authority of the Secretary of Health and 

Human Services to issue priority review vouchers to encourage treatments for rare pediatric diseases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Creating Hope Reau5 thorization Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4583 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ISSUE PRIORITY RE2 VIEW VOUCHERS TO ENCOURAGE TREAT3 MENTS FOR RARE PEDIATRIC DISEASES. 

4 Section 529(b)(5) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 

5 Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360ff(b)(5)) is amended by strik6 ing ‘‘September 30, 2024, unless’’ and all that follows 

7 through the period at the end and inserting ‘‘September 

8 30, 2030.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Granting Respondent’s Request for Extension of Time

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II,

Petitioner,

v.

TOM L. CAREY,

Respondent.

2:04-cv-02245 LKK KJM P

ORDER GRANTING

RESPONDENT’S FIRST

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, respondent is granted a thirty-day

extension of time, to and including, March 8, 2006, within which to file his response to the

petition in this matter.

DATED: February 21, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02245-LKK -KJM Document 12 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY MARSHALL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1657 DFL PAN P

vs.

SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Pursuant to defendants’ April 28, 2006 objections to the scheduling order filed in

this action on April 26, 2006, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the

jury trial set before the Honorable David F. Levi is reset from April 9, 2007 to April 23, 2007, at

8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7. 

DATED: May 31, 2006.

/mp

mars1657.41rev

Case 2:04-cv-01657-AK Document 99 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 1
# App A. Discrete

# App C. Majors Nuts OC

# App D. TE REE

# App E.  Organic Comp

# App F. BedMaterial Organic
No. 57303.

protests 198426-K, etc. (New York).

#### Brenner Bros. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set.forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ERIC ANTHONY GOLDBERG,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 379 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JEROME ROBINSON, Fireman Recruit, U. S. Navy, Appellant

18 USCMA 159, 39 CMR 159

No. 21,742

March 7, 1969

*Lieutenant Donald B. Brant, Jr.,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Walter F. Brown,*JAGC, USN, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Government counsel concedes that the procedure followed by the convening authority in the appointment of the court-martial in this case is the same as that determined to be vio-lative of the Uniform Code of Military Justice in United States v McLaughlin, 18 USCMA 61, 39 CMR 61. Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

David Wayne Elmore,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-2657 GEB PAN P

vs. Order

Tom L. Carey, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoOctober 14, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion to amend the

complaint and amended complaint. Plaintiff may amend once as of

right where no defendant has served an answer. Plaintiff’s

amended complaint does not attach the proof of service required

by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 and Local Rule 5-135, showing it was served

on Traquina, the sole defendant who has been served and appeared. 

Plaintiff shall file a proof of service within ten days. 

The amended complaint states cognizable claims for relief

against all defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. 

Case 2:04-cv-02657-GEB-EFB Document 19 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

§ 1915A(b). 

Accordingly, the court hereby orders that:

1. The amended complaint is appropriate for service on

defendants Carey, Hooper, Borges, Wedell, Turella, Naku, Rohrer,

Kofoed, Noriega, Solomon and Franklin. 

2. Plaintiff submitted USM-285 forms and a summons for

serving these defendants and the court still has those materials. 

The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff a copy of the October

14, 2005, amended complaint. 

3. Within 30 days from service of this order, plaintiff

shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and

submit it to the court with twelve copies of the October 14,

2005, amended complaint.

4. Upon receipt of the necessary copies of the amended

complaint, the court will direct the United States Marshal to

serve defendants Carey, Hooper, Borges, Wedell, Turella, Naku,

Rohrer, Kofoed, Noriega, Solomon and Franklin pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. Defendant Traquina shall respond to the amended pleading

within 20 days after plaintiff serves it upon him by mailing a

copy to Traquina’s attorney.

Dated: February 2, 2006. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02657-GEB-EFB Document 19 Filed 02/02/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

David Wayne Elmore,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-2657 GEB PAN P

vs. Notice of Submission of Documents

Tom L. Carey, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff hereby submits the following documents in

compliance with the court's order filed :

 completed summons form

 completed forms USM-285 

 copies of the 

 Amended Complaint

Dated: 

 _________________________________

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-02657-GEB-EFB Document 19 Filed 02/02/06 Page 3 of 3
(Reap. Dec. 8530)

#### Nyos, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 757634.

(Decided January 20, 1956)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

This appeal was taken under section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for reappraisement of the appraised value of certain merchandise, described as spiced beef loaf, and imported from Australia at the port of New York. Pursuant to the requirements of 28 U. S. C. § 2632, reasonable notice was duly given *518on several occasions of the time and place when the parties would have opportunity to be heard, such hearings being continued on request. The latest such hearing date, October 24, 1955, was duly noticed and, on October 20, 1955, the parties submitted the appeal for decision, without introduction of evidence or argument.

Section 2633, title 28, United States Code, provides that the value found by the appraiser shall be presumed to be the value of the merchandise and that the burden shall rest upon the party who challenges its correctness to prove otherwise. Plaintiff herein has not made any proofs.

Accordingly, on the presumption provided in section 2633, *supra,*the value of the merchandise herein is found to be the value found by the appraiser. The appeal is dismissed and judgment will be entered accordingly.
**EXHIBIT      21**

**LIST      OF SUBSIDIARIES**

| **Name                of Subsidiary**               |   | **Percentage                of Ownership** |   | **State                or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Syscan,                Inc.                         |   | 100%                                       |   | California                                                      |
| Syscan                Laser Technology, Ltd.**(3)** |   | 100                                        |   | BVI**1**                Corp./HK**2**                registered |
| Leadbuilt                Technology LTD.**(3)**     |   | 100                                        |   | BVI**1**                Corp./HK**2**                registered |
|                                                     |   |                                       |   |                                                            |
|                                                     |   |                                       |   |                                                            |

----

| **1** | British                Virgin Islands |
|-------|---------------------------------------|

| **2** | Hong                Kong |
|-------|--------------------------|

| **3** | As                of December 31, 2007, this subsidiary is inactive and is in the process                of                being closed. |
|-------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Sun Life Financial Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his respective knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 16, 2017



/s/ Dean A. ConnorDean A. ConnorPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: February 16, 2017



/s/ Colm J. FreyneColm J. FreyneExecutive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer


This certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed to have been, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3969]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-181-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

February 27, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 22, 2007, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, Twenty Fourth Revised Sheet No. 19, Second Revised Sheet 
No. 19A, and Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 68H , to become effective 
April 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f8bebdaabbb7969491969dab8d8888978a8cb89e9d8a9bd69f978e">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3969 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GYPSIE JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

PACPIZZA, LLC DBA PIZZA HUT #1508,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV.S.04-2211 DFL CMK

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S04-2211 DFL CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: 5/24/2005 /s/ David F. Levi 

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02211-DFL-CMK Document 21 Filed 05/25/05 Page 1 of 1
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4671 

To limit cost sharing for prescription drugs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11 (legislative day, JULY 10), 2024 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. WARNOCK, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. FETTERMAN, 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. HEINRICH, 

Ms. BALDWIN, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

A BILL 

To limit cost sharing for prescription drugs, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Capping Prescription 

5 Costs Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CAP ON PRESCRIPTION DRUG COST-SHARING. 

7 (a) QUALIFIED HEALTH PLANS.—Section 1302(c) of 

8 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 18022(c)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4671 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (3)(A)(i), by inserting ‘‘, in2 cluding cost-sharing with respect to prescription 

3 drugs covered by the plan’’ after ‘‘charges’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(5) PRESCRIPTION DRUG COST-SHARING.— 

6 ‘‘(A) 2026.—For plan years beginning in 

7 2026, the cost-sharing incurred under a health 

8 plan with respect to prescription drugs covered 

9 by the plan shall not exceed $2,000 per year for 

10 each enrolled individual, or $4,000 per year for 

11 each family. 

12 ‘‘(B) 2027 AND LATER.— 

13 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any 

14 plan year beginning in a calendar year 

15 after 2026, the limitation under this para16 graph shall be equal to the applicable dol17 lar amount under subparagraph (A) for 

18 plan years beginning in 2026, increased by 

19 an amount equal to the product of that 

20 amount and the medical care component of 

21 the consumer price index for all urban con22 sumers (as published by the Bureau of 

23 Labor Statistics) for that year. 

24 ‘‘(ii) ADJUSTMENT TO AMOUNT.—If 

25 the amount of any increase under clause 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4671 IS

1 (i) is not a multiple of $5, such increase 

2 shall be rounded to the next lowest mul3 tiple of $5.’’. 

4 (b) GROUP HEALTH PLANS.—Section 2707(b) of the 

5 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–6(b)) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘annual’’; and 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1) of section 

9 1302(c)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (1) and (5) of 

10 section 1302(c) of the Patient Protection and Af11 fordable Care Act’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect with respect to 

14 plans beginning after December 31, 2025. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
37°45'N

44 poe

44 a

37°30'N

a4 pine

4.4 98000
37°15'N

44 1 0000

34 M5000

a
Z
’
> 7
\\
=A

—-— Stream, mostly intermittant
O City, town, or village
—- Province boundary

AE pe I ee A
SR oh BRON US) * £
EXPLANATION
—— Road & Peak

[_] Area of interest
[_] Image subarea

71°E

G7 70 6 0000

0 10 KILOMETERS

[———

0 5 MILES
Before the First Division,

April 5, 1946

No. 50997.

#### Protest 69124-K of Pacific Trading Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of dried, unsalted fish the same in all material respects as that passed upon in Abstract 50242. In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
No. 47378.

#### Protests 976599-G, etc., of Central Vermont Railway, Inc. (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition ip which imported, and that no addition should have been made for the planing, tonguing, and grooving. Protests sustained to this extent.
Before the Second Division,

September 22, 1950

No. 54678.

#### Norman G. Jensen *v.*United States,

petition 6739-R (Pembina).

Opinion

J.

The hides were originally entered at the invoice prices, less an item of freight from Winnipeg to Montreal. An amended entry was ■filed in which the item of freight was included, but petitioner again used the invoice prices per pound. At the trial petitioner’s witness testified that she ¡noticed the difference of 2 cents per pound as shown on the two invoices; that in making the entry it was her intention to use the higher figure or price, but through inadvertence she used the two sets of prices as shown on the respective invoices; and that in making the amended entry there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States. On the record presented it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 59544.

protest 241691-K (New York).

#### Moscahlades Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists, in fact, of an Argentine Sbrinz cheese, in original loaves, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
##### 



Exhibit
10.2
 th
 Dated as of: September 30, 2007 
 Re:
    
    Amendment No. 1 to Secured Term Loan Agreement
  Credit Agreement Borrower Lender Lenders Agent Amendment




---



##### 



ARTICLE I
 AMENDMENTS TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
    Borrowing Base Pool Leverage
  Borrowing Base Pool Debt Service Coverage Ratio divided by divided by
 ARTICLE II
 COVENANT
 divided by
 2




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO AMENDMENT
     ARTICLE IV
 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
  Representations and Warranties
 No Defaults or Events of Default
 Binding Effect of Documents
 3




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 MISCELLANEOUS
  4




---



##### 



Very truly yours,FIRST POTOMAC REALTY INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIPBy:
    First Potomac Realty Trust,
its sole general partnerBy:
    s Barry H. BassBarry H. Bass, Chief FinancialOfficer and Executive Vice President  5




---



##### 



CONSENT OF GUARANTOR
 Guarantor Guaranty
 GUARANTOR:FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUSTBy:
    s Barry BassBarry Bass, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer 6




---



##### 



KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
Individually and as Administrative AgentBy:

/s/
John ScottName:
    John ScottTitle:
    Vice PresidentPNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
IndividuallyBy:

/s/
Timothy P. GleesonName:
    Timothy P. GleesonTitle:
    Vice President 7