alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEWAYNE McGEE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1603 GEB DAD P

vs.

O. DICKINSON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 22, 2005, the court ordered the U.S. Marshal to serve the six

defendants in this action with the summons and second amended complaint. Service was

unexecuted for defendants Mangis and Diggins. On October 27, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff

to provide additional information to serve process on these two defendants. Before the court is

plaintiff’s December 19, 2005 motion to compel the litigation coordinator at High Desert State

Prison to disclose the residential addresses of defendants Mangis and Diggins. The court will

deny plaintiff’s motion. When the court ordered the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons and

second amended complaints on defendants, the Marshal was instructed to command all necessary

assistance from the California Department of Corrections to effect service. The Marshal has

informed the court that defendants Mangis and Diggins are no longer employed at High Desert

State Prison, and that the Department of Corrections was unable to locate these defendants. 

There is no evidence that these efforts were incomplete or faulty. Furthermore, plaintiff seeks a

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 30 Filed 01/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

court order without showing that he has attempted to conduct appropriate discovery as authorized

by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

On December 19, 2005, plaintiff requested an additional sixty days to complete

the documents for service on defendants Mangis and Diggins. The court will provide plaintiff

with an additional thirty days. Plaintiff is cautioned that the court is authorized to dismiss claims

against a defendant who has not been served with process within 120 days after the filing of the

complaint, unless the plaintiff shows good cause for failing to effect service. Fed. R. Civ. P.

4(m). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s December 19, 2005 motion to compel is denied;

2. Plaintiff's December 19, 2005 application for an extension of time is granted in

part; and

3. Within thirty days from the service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the

completed notice of submission of documents, one summons, two USM-285 forms for

defendants Mangis and Diggins, and three copies of the June 30, 2005 second amended

complaint.

DATED: January 4, 2006.

DAD:mp/4

rich1603.36(3)

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 30 Filed 01/05/06 Page 2 of 2
#### Richard Bower, Respondent, v Thomas D. Anderson et al., Defendants, and Joel Jacobson, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 474]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for fraud, the defendant Joel Jacobson appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.), dated May 17, 1994, as denied those branches of his motion which were to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him, or, in the alternative, to sever the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him for the purpose of conducting separate trials.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff’s causes of action to recover damages for fraud alleged the essential elements of fraud *(see, Clearview Concrete Prods. Corp. v S. Charles Gherardi, Inc.,*88 AD2d 461) and set them forth in sufficient detail to clearly inform the defendant Joel Jacobson of the incidents complained of *(see,*CPLR 3016 [b]; *Lanzi v Brooks,*43 NY2d 778). Accordingly, the fraud causes of action should not be dismissed. The denial of dismissal of the plaintiff’s cause of action alleging breach of a fiduciary duty was proper as the defendant Joel Jacobson failed to present an argument warranting dismissal of that cause of action.

*306We reject the defendant Joel Jacobson’s application to sever the causes of action asserted against him. The roles of the defendant Joel Jacobson and the other codefendants are so inextricably interwoven that a single trial is appropriate in the furtherance of the interest of judicial economy *(see, Mclver v Canning,*204 AD2d 698; *Klein v City of Long Beach,*154 AD2d 346). Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.
Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM   Document 10    Filed 02/02/06   Page 1 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM   Document 10    Filed 02/02/06   Page 2 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM   Document 10    Filed 02/02/06   Page 3 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM   Document 10    Filed 02/02/06   Page 4 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM   Document 10    Filed 02/02/06   Page 5 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM   Document 10    Filed 02/02/06   Page 6 of 6

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-20T12:03:46-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Adams, Kevin 

## (OSJf r;:

From: Sent: To: Bobby Hans <bobbyhons@hawaii.rr.com> Monday{ July 08{ 2013 9:40 PM 

### ij. CJ**~;** EAS (OST) Subject: Fwd: WAIMEA-KOHALA AIR SERVICE I ONGOING SAGA OF PACIFIC WINGS LACK OF SERVICE

THIS HORROR STORY OF PACIFIC WINGS CONTINUING THEIR POOR SERVICE CONTINUES, WHICH SHOULD SHOW YOU THEY SHOULD NOT BEALLOWED TO BID THE KAMUELA/ KOHALA ROUTE. OURKIDS AND GRANDKIDS HAD CONFIRMED FLIGHTS TO KAMUELA FROM MAUL TWO KIDS ARRIVED SAT. AND TODAY MON 7/8/13 THEIRPARENTS WERE SCHEDULED TO ARRIVE. WITHOUT ANY WARNING, OUR CHILDREN AND TWO OTHER GRANDKIDS ARRIVED AT THE MAUl AIRPORT TO FLY TO KAMUELA, WHEN THEY WERE TOLD THE FLIGHT AND ALL OTHERS THROUGH SATURDAY WERE CANCELLED. THIS LEFT THEM TO FEND FORTHEMSELVES TO MAKE OTHERARRANGEMENTS. THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER CASES

I OF THIS LACK OF RESPONSIBILITY BY THIS "FLY BYNITE" SHODEYAIRLINE;EXCUSE THE PUN. THIS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE, AND THE ONLY WAY1IS TO KEEP THEM FROM BIDDINGTHIS ROUTE ORANY OTHERIN HA WAil. ROBERT HONS
Beginforwarded message:



### From: Bobby Hons <bobbyhons@hawaii.rr.com> Date: June 21, 2013 3:35:42 PM HST To: eas@dot.gov Subject: WAIMEA-KOHALA AIR SERVICE

ALOHA, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION; I AMWRITING YOU IN SUPPORT OF MOKULELE AIRLINES SERVICING OURWONDERFUL COMMUNITY WITH AIR "SERVICE" TO THE OTHER ISLANDS. AT THE SAME TIME I WOULD BE REMISS IN NOT TAKING YOU FOLKS AT THE DOT TO TASKFOR LETTING PACIFIC WINGS CONTINUE TO RIP OFF THE SYSTEM WHERE THEY WERE ABLE TO CONTINUE RECEIVING FUNDS UNDERFALSE PRETENSES OF HAVING AIR SERVICE THAT WAS NON EXISTENT FOR 6 YRS

.. I THINK THEY SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE BIDDING FORTHIS CONTRACT. ALSO WE WERE ONLY AWARE OF THIS MOVE OF OPENING BIDDINGFORTHESE ROUTES ON A 6/20/13, IN ANARTICLE IN THENEWSPAPER, WHICH WAS THE LAST DAY FORCOMMUNITY INPUT. NEVERTHE LESS, THIS MUCHNEEDED SERVICE HAS BEEN OVERLOOKED FORTOO LONG, AND WILL BEMUCH APPRECIATED. MAHALO ROBERT C HONS --WAIMEA RESIDENT

1
II 

Calendar No. 681 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4656 

[Report No. 118–278] 

To amend title 5, United States Code, concerning restrictions on the participation of certain Federal employees in partisan political activity, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2024 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

DECEMBER 9, 2024 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, concerning restrictions 

on the participation of certain Federal employees in partisan political activity, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4656 RS

1 SECTION 1. RESTRICTIONS ON PARTISAN POLITICAL AC2 TIVITY. 

3 Section 7323(b)(2)(B)(i) of title 5, United States 

4 Code, is amended— 

5 (1) in subclause (XIII), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

6 end; 

7 (2) in subclause (XIV), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

8 end; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(XV) any Office of Inspector General es11 tablished under chapter 4; or 

12 ‘‘(XVI) any Office of Special Inspector 

13 General; or’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 681 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4656 

[Report No. 118–278] 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, concerning 

for other purposes. eral employees in partisan political activity, and restrictions on the participation of certain FedDECEMBER 9, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Before the Second Division,

September 14, 1945

No. 50486.

#### Protest 111076-K of Jean R. Graef, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise consists of lithographically printed calendars similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Thorens, Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 298), the protest was sustained as claimed.
No. 55281.

#### A. Kuehnert & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 123741-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-0878-GEB-DAD-P

vs.

C/O KISSINGER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 3, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Plaintiff has

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

///

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 170 Filed 03/10/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 3, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s June 2, 2008 motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 118) is

denied; and

3. Plaintiff’s state law claims under the California Constitution Article I, Section

17, California Government Code § 815.6, and California Code of Regulations Title 15

§§ 3268(a)(2) & 3, 3268.1(a)(1), and 3268.2(b)(3) are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: March 9, 2009

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 170 Filed 03/10/09 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

ERIC HODGSON,

Plaintiff(s),

vs. CIV-S-04-2436-GEB/GGH 

 

MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A.

AND DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendant(s).

______________________________________/

 Defendant filed a discovery motion on June 24, 2005 set for hearing July 28,

2005 @ 10:00 a.m.. Having reviewed the record and all filings, the court has determined that the

hearing will not be vacated. The parties shall appear at the scheduled time.

Dated: 7/26/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 ___________________________________

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

U.S. Magistrate Judge

hodgson2436.251

Case 2:04-cv-02436-GEB-GGH Document 33 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350 The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 of Jafra Worldwide Holdings (Lux) S.àr.l.
(the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ RONALD B. CLARKRonald B. ClarkChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
 August 13, 2004 66
II 

Calendar No. 404 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4359 

To amend the National Dam Safety Program Act to reauthorize that Act, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2024 

Mr. PADILLA (for himself and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

MAY 22, 2024 

Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the National Dam Safety Program Act to 

reauthorize that Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM ACT. 

4 (a) REHABILITATION OF HIGH HAZARD POTENTIAL

5 DAMS.—Section 8A(j)(4) of the National Dam Safety 

6 Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f–2(j)(4)) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘2026’’ and inserting ‘‘2029’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4359 RS

1 (b) NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.—Section 14 

2 of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 

3 467j) is amended by striking ‘‘2023’’ each place it appears 

4 and inserting ‘‘2029’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 404 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4359 

A BILL 

To amend the National Dam Safety Program Act 

to reauthorize that Act, and for other purposes. 

MAY 22, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 47857.

#### Petition 6185-R of International Trading Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From a careful consideration of the case the court was unable to find evidence sufficient to establish that the importer was without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to misrepresent the facts or deceive the appraiser. The petition was therefore denied.
No. 52017.

#### B. Derounian et al. *v.*United States,

protests 597507-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3062

___________________________

Catherine Dahlberg

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Radisson Blu Mall of America

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: June 10, 2020

Filed: June 15, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRASZ, BEAM, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Catherine Dahlberg appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary

judgment in this employment discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the

1The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota.
record and the arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court did not err in

granting summary judgment. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031,

1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
No. 52030.

#### American Nepheline Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 124941-K (Rochester).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ground nepheline syenite similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Great Lakes Foundry Sand Co.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 170, C. D. 685) and *V. J. Cronin*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 86, C. D. 293). In accordance with stipulation and following the decisions cited the claim for free entry under paragraph 1775 was sustained.
No. 48546.

#### Protests 98116-K, etc., of Irving L. Hartman Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise consists of hemp hats the same as those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) and other items consist of racello hats the same *216in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 47291. In accordance therewith, the items in question were held dutiable as hats of ramie or hemp, not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000052409-JAN-201309:31 AM
No. 58572.

protests 235796-K and 235803-K (New York).

#### Louis Greenberg & Son, Inc., and M. Pressner & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of compass rings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58039, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 51442.

#### Protests 721297-G, etc., of R. A. Lopez (New York).

*227Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese the same as that the subject of Abstract 48269. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2J4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 49667.

#### Protest 108748-K of Stone & Downer Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

When the case was called for hearing counsel for defendant conceded that the average clean content yield of 47.815 percent, as claimed by the plaintiff in his protest, as amended, is correct. In accordance therewith the protest was sustained-to this extent.
No. 51714.

#### Protest 110226-K of Siegfried Loewenthal Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of certain cases was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the inspector’s return as verified by the affidavit of the importer. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Before the Third Division,

November 1, 1951

No. 55968.

petition 6769-R (Denver).

#### Jean Laytman *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The lipsticks were invoiced and entered at 14 and 53 cents apiece, the difference in price being due to the type of packing or case, and the appraiser advanced the values to 21 and 79 cents apiece, respectively. The petitioner testified as to the prices paid for the merchandise and the circumstances surrounding the importation. Government counsel stated that the customs officials had informed him that, in their opinion, the entry of the merchandise was made at the lower prices because of the petitioner’s ignorance of customs laws and that petitioner had given them all the information in her possession. The court held that while it is true that ignorance of the law is no excuse, nevertheless, in view of the statements of the Government officials that the petitioner disclosed to them all the information in her possession and that, in their opinion, there was no intention to deceive or defraud the United States, the petition should be and the same was granted.
Exhibit 31.1.b

CERTIFICATIONS







|I, Andrea F. Bielsker, certify that:
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|1.                                  
|                                    
|2.                                  
|                                    
|3.                                  
|                                    
|4.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|5.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    



|Date: | March 10, 2004 |  | /s/Andrea F. Bielsker                                                                    
|----- | -------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |                |  |                                                                                          
|      |                |  | Andrea F. Bielsker
Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Case 2:04-cv-02028-WBS-DAD   Document 29    Filed 08/14/06   Page 1 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-02028-WBS-DAD   Document 29    Filed 08/14/06   Page 2 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-02028-WBS-DAD   Document 29    Filed 08/14/06   Page 3 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-02028-WBS-DAD   Document 29    Filed 08/14/06   Page 4 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-02028-WBS-DAD   Document 29    Filed 08/14/06   Page 5 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-02028-WBS-DAD   Document 29    Filed 08/14/06   Page 6 of 6

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-20T19:26:34-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 38864.

#### Protests 226531-G, etc., of John Wanamaker (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel artificial flowers similar to those involved in *Robinson-Goodman*v. *United States*(17 C. C. *316P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419 and articles in chief value of compounds of cellulose at 60 percent under paragraph 31.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF LAW

EXAMINERS :

:

:

:

: No. 792

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15 th day of February , 2019, Leslie A. Collins, Esquire, Dauphin

County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners

for a term of three years, commencing April 1, 2019.
No. 60858.

#### DuCaire Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 307938-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the latter “C” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.