alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 - Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)



                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of JCG, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I,
Jeffrey Chad Guidry, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jeffrey Chad Guidry
----------------------------
    Jeffrey Chad Guidry
    Chief Executive Officer
    Chief Financial Officer

Date  November 3, 2003
      ----------------

<PAGE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation for Dismissal and Order Thereon Sanford v. Dairy Queen, et. al.

 CIV.S.04-2044 LKK GGH

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES SANFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

MANU JAISINGHANI & KAVITA

JAISINGHANI; CONFUCIUS CHURCH OF

SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV.S.04-2044 LKK GGH

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND

ORDER THEREON 

Case 2:04-cv-02044-LKK -GGH Document 19 Filed 07/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation for Dismissal and Order Thereon Sanford v. Dairy Queen, et. al.

- 2 - CIV.S.04-2044 LKK GGH

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES:

Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement and Release between plaintiff, JAMES

SANFORD, and defendants, MANU JAISINGHANI & KAVITA JAISINGHANI and

CONFUCIUS CHURCH OF SACRAMENTO, the parties hereby request that all parties be

dismissed with prejudice from the above-entitled action.

Dated: May 4, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

___./s/ Lynn Hubbard, III

LYNN HUBBARD, III 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: _______________, 2005 LIVINGSTON & MATTESICH

Signature on File____________

KATHLEEN FINNERTY

Attorney for Defendant MANU JAISINGHANI &

KAVITA JAISINGHANI

Dated:________________, 2005 ROBINSON DILANDO & WHITAKER

____Signature on File__________

SHAWNA KASHACK

Attorney for Defendant CONFUCIUS CHURCH

OF SACRAMENTO

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S04-

2044 LKK GGH, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: July 12, 2005. /s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02044-LKK -GGH Document 19 Filed 07/13/05 Page 2 of 2
June 24, 1940

No. 44024.

#### Protests 833314-G, etc., of Alpha Lux Co., Inc., et al.

Application by plaintiffs for rehearing granted.
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 12 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarter  ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I, Thomas J. Riha,
Chief  Financial  Officer  of WNC &  Associates,  Inc.,  general  partner of the
Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 14, 2005
No. 48529.

#### Protest 40405-K of T. A. Desmond & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items consist of hats similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was therefore sustained.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 21

- 13181
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
BLONDELL GARNER CLARK,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus IBM,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:19

- cv

- 02834

- TWT

____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-13181 Date Filed: 01/20/2022 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 21

- 13181

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM , and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: In November of 2019, the district court dismissed Blonde ll Garner Clark ’s ERISA lawsuit against IBM for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Ms. Clark , proceeding pro se , now appeals the district court’s denial of her post

- judgment motion for a new trial , which she filed in August of 2021

. She argues that the district court ignored “evidence” that she presented with her complaint and therefore should be granted a new trial. A court is permitted to grant a new trial following a jury or nonjury tri al based on insufficiency of evidence. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a); Gill as Next Friend of K.C.R. v. Judd , 941 F.3d 504, 521 (11 th Cir. 2019). A motion to grant a new trial must be filed “no later than 28 days after the entry of judgment

. ” See Fed. R. Civ . P. 59(b). Here there was no trial, so Rule 59(a) could not provide Ms. Clark with any relief. To the extent that Ms. Clark sought to alter or amend thedistrict court’s judgment under Rule 59(e), that motion was untimely. A motion to alter and amend must likewise be filed within 28 days of the judgment, and Ms. Clark filed her motion almost two years after the district court dismissed her complaint.A court is permitted to relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or pr oceeding if there is newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered in time USCA11 Case: 21-13181 Date Filed: 01/20/2022 Page: 2 of 321

- 13181 Opinion of the Court 3
to move for a new trial under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(b). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(2) ; Am. Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla. v. Nw. Nat. Ins. Co. , 198 F.3d 1332, 1338 (11th Cir. 1999) . A motion of relief from a judgment , however, must be filed “no more than a year after the entry of the judgment or order or the date of the proceeding.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(1). As noted, Ms. Clark’s motion was filed more than a year after the d ismissal of her complaint, so it was untimely even if it was filed under Rule 60(b).
T he district court properly denied Ms. Clark’s post

-judgment motion . We therefore affirm.
AFFIRMED USCA11 Case: 21-13181 Date Filed: 01/20/2022 Page: 3 of 3
No. 61357.

protest 510659-G.

#### Andrew Levy *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 1 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 2 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 3 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 4 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 5 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 6 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 7 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 8 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 9 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 10 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 11 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 12 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 13 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 14 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 15 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 16 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 17 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 18 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 19 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 20 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 21 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 22 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 23 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 24 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 25 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 26 of 27

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 25    Filed 12/16/05   Page 27 of 27

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-24T21:05:21-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
APPLICANT KENNETH RAY JOHNSON APPLICATION NO. 78,231-05 

APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 

ACTION TAKEN 

JUDGE DATE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

JAMES WHITTENBERG,

Plaintiff,

v.

LIEUTENANT L. ROLL,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 2:04-cv-2313 FCD JFM P

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S SECOND

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

The Court, having considered Defendant’s request for an extension of time to file a

motion for summary judgment, and good cause having been found.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The deadline for both parties to file a dispositive motion is extended to June 26,

2006. 

2. The parties are relieved of their obligation to file pretrial statements pursuant to the

December 6, 2005 scheduling order until further order of court;

3. The July 14, 2006 pretrial conference before the undersigned is vacated;

4. The October 17, 2006 jury trial date before the Honorable Frank C. Damrell is

vacated; and

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02313-FCD-JFM Document 60 Filed 05/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. The pretrial conference and jury trial dates will be reset, as appropriate, following

resolution of dispositive motions.

DATED: May 17, 2006.

whit2313.eot.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-02313-FCD-JFM Document 60 Filed 05/18/06 Page 2 of 2
EUZABE i A.BROWN CLERK • S PRENE COURT

CLERK BY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 83673 

# FILED

- 

### JAN 1 3 2022 IN THE MATTER OF THE PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO: L. I., MINOR UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE. CODY B., Appellant, vs. STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES; AND L. I., MINOR UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, Res • ondents.

ORDE1? DISMISSING APPEAL

This pro se appeal was docketed in this court on October 25, 2021, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 14 days. On November 4, 2021, appellant filed a letter informing this court that he is unable to pay the fee at this time. Later that same day, this court filed an order directing appellant to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the district court in the first instance and file a file-stamped copy of the application in this court or pay the filing fee within 30 days. Appellant was cautioned that failure to comply would resul t in the dismissal of this appeal.

On December 2, 2021, appellant filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On December 15, 2021, this court entered another order directing appellant to file the motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the district court in the first instance or pay the filing fee within 15 days. Appellant was again cautioned again that failure to comply SUPREME COuRT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER
(0) 1947 400)..By:

would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or demonstrated that he has complied with NRAP 24. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2).

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN

cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division Cody B. Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, Inc. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER i0) 1947 600) 9
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CanoPetroleum, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedDecember 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Morris B. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company, as of , and for, the periods presented in theReport.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as anexhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K andSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 202 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and,accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.
| February 9, 2007 | /s/ Morris B. Smith     |   |
|------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|             | Morris B. Smith         |   |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit (13) a.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Komatsu Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 5, 2007 as amended by this Form 20-F/A (Amendment No. 1) dated the
date hereof (the Report), I, Kunio Noji, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s) 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 19, 2007



By:

/s/ KUNIO NOJIKunio NojiPresident and Chief Executive Officer




3
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 9653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3961]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, February 22, 2012, 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

PLACE: Commission Meeting Room on the First Floor of the EEOC Office 
Building, 131 ``M'' Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507.

STATUS: Part of the meeting will be open to the public and part of the 
meeting will be closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Open Session

    1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and
    2. EEOC Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2012-2016.

Closed Session

    Agency Adjudication and Determination on Federal Agency 
Discrimination Complaint Appeals

    Note:  In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the open session of 
the meeting will be open to public observation of the Commission's 
deliberations and voting. The remainder of the meeting will be 
closed. Any matter not discussed or concluded may be carried over to 
a later meeting.
    For the open session, seating is limited and it is suggested 
that visitors arrive 30 minutes before the meeting in order to be 
processed through security and escorted to the meeting room. (In 
addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the 
Federal Register, the Commission also provides information about 
Commission meetings on its Web site, eeoc.gov., and provides a 
recorded announcement a week in advance on future Commission 
sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation and Communication Access Realtime Translation 
(CART) services at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. 
Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the 
voice and TTY numbers listed above.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Bernadette B. Wilson, Acting 
Executive Officer on (202) 663-4077.

    This Notice Issued February 15, 2012.
Bernadette B. Wilson,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2012-3961 Filed 2-15-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4063]



[[Page 10559]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,318]


Delphi Corporation, Automotive Holdings Group, Anaheim, CA; 
Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Delphi Corporation, Automotive 
Holdings Group, Anaheim, California. The application did not contain 
new information supporting a conclusion that the determination was 
erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for reconsideration 
of the determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the 
application was issued:

TA-W-60,318; Delphi Corporation, Automotive Holdings Group, Anaheim, 
California (February 23, 2007)

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of February 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-4063 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Internet Address (URL)  http://www.epa.gov

Recycled/Recyclable  Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)

FMI Products, LLC

2701 South Harbor Boulevard

Santa Ana, CA 92704

Dear Mr. Klein:

We are pleased to acknowledge that the FMI Products fireplace retrofit device, PureFireTM 

Catalytic Control System, as tested in the FMI Craftsman 36 fireplace, meets the Phase 2

qualifying emissions level under the EPA Wood-burning Fireplace Program. The FMI

Craftsman 36 firebox meets the equivalency criteria in the Program Partnership Agreement.

This acknowledgement is based on:

• our review of the test report from Myren Consulting Test Laboratories dated

March 5, 2010;

• your submittal of an appropriate Owner's Manual that covers proper operation of

this retrofit device;

• the equivalency of the Craftsman 36 firebox to the Heatilator E36 firebox as

demonstrated in the FMI Products document provided to EPA on August 7,

2012; and

• the ISO-accredited lab certification letter from PFS Corporation, dated

November 6, 2012.

The retrofit device, as tested in the FMI Craftsman 36 fireplace (width: 28.25 inches;

height: 21 inches; depth: 16 inches), resulted in an average emissions of 4.8 grams of fine

particles (PM2.s) per kilogram of wood burned. This PM2.5 emission level is below the EPA

qualifying Phase 2 emission level of 5.1 g/kg. It represents a 60 percent emission reduction

from a baseline of 12 grams/kg (assumed average emissions for existing fireplaces). 

Emission reductions for this retrofit device may vary in other fireplaces.

You may use the qualifying labels and hangtags in accordance with the Partnership

Agreement Guidelines. Information regarding this retrofit device will be posted on the EPA

Burn Wise website: http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/fireplacelist.html#retrofits.

Thank you for your participation in EPA's Wood-burning Fireplace Program and your 

interest in improving air quality. We recommend that EPA Phase 2 qualified cleaner 

fireplace models be considered over other fireplaces and that Phase 2 retrofit devices be

considered for reducing wood smoke pollution from existing fireplaces.

The template for the Phase 2 qualified fireplace retrofit hangtag has been forwarded to you by

separate e-mail. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 541-

5383.

 Sincerely,

 

Thomas N. Braverman

 EPA Wood-Burning Fireplace Program Liaison

 Innovative Programs and Outreach

OFFICE OF

AIR QUALITY PLANNING

AND STANDARDS

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711

 December 20, 2012
Internet Address (URL)  http://www.epa.gov

Recycled/Recyclable  Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)

Figure: (1)

Approved EPA Hangtag

PureFire Wood Burning Fireplace Retro-Fit Device

2