alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

December 4, 1946

No. 51446.

#### Protests 772712-G, etc., of Van Raalte & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. Julius *Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

April 17, 1946

No. 51015.

#### Protests 111082-K, etc., of Thorens Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It is stipulated that the music boxes are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Thorens Co.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 165, C. D. 965). In accordance therewith the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1541 (a), as modified by T. D. 48093, was sustained.
### *An official caption cont aining a complete list of parties is

on file and available for insp ection in the Office of the Clerk of the Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. _____________ No. 95-3613WA No. 95-3979WA

_____________ Robert A. Miller, et al., * * Appellees, * Appeals from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas. * Tony Alamo, et al., * [UNPUBLISHED] * * Appellants. *

_____________ Submitted: July 5, 1996 Filed: November 6, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Tony A lamo appeals the district court's orders denying Alamo' s Feder al Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion attacking as void a civi l judgment against him, see Miller v. Tony and Susan Alamo Found. , 748 F . Supp. 695 (W.D. Ark. 1990), and granting the plaintiffs' fourth petition for attorney's fees and costs. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude no error of law appears, and an extended discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B . A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 10.2

 

Compensation of Joseph S. Borbely

 


	
Annual Base Salary:
	
$400,000 commencing on April 1, 2015, subject to increase at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

	
 
	
 

	
Bonus:
	
Mr. Borbely is entitled to participate in the Senior Management Bonus Program.
No. 62606.

#### Harold Smith *v.*United States,

protest 153400-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of goatskins and sheepskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Nawi Noonoo & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 57, C. D. 1904), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 8678)

Entry No. W-03015.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided October 10, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above, with the exception of nine cases of Copper Kettles marked (B-l 1176), K7256/7264inclusive, at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised value less the addition made to meet the advances by the Appraiser in similar cases covering non-dutiable so-called (P. O. B.) charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling and lighterage.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reap-praisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved, except the copper kettles contained in cases K7256-K7264, inclusive, and that such values were the appraised values, less the additions made to meet the advances by the appraiser in similar cases covering nondutiable so-called (f. o. b.) charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling, and lighterage.

Insofar as the appeal relates to the copper kettles contained in cases K7256-K7264, inclusive, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
SERVED: MAY 7, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SCOTT NOVAK 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

FOMS NO. FAA-2012-0206 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

ll ~~~a p i:t1.2 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012NM730033) has been 

assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and 

other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA 

Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1 

ONE COPY 

Joseph W. Geldhof, Respondent's Counsel 

2 Marine Way, Suite 207 

Juneau, AK 99801 

TEL: 907-586-8193 

MOBILE: 907-723-9901 

E-mail: joeg@alaska. com 

Howard L. Martin, Jr., Complainant's Counsel 

Regional Counsel, Office ofRegional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7th Avenue #14 · 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5269 

FAX: 907- 271-2800 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0206 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

· 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), I, Benjamin Daitch,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cano Petroleum, Inc.(the “Company”), certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:      May 12,  2010 |   | /s/ Benjamin Daitch                                |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |   | Benjamin Daitch                                    |
|                                                        |   | Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David C. Clark, certify that:

 

1.                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Allos Therapeutics, Inc.; and

 

2.                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date:  | April 27,   2012 | /s/ DAVID   C. CLARK                      |
|--------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|   |                  | David C. Clark                                 |
|   |                  | *Vice President, Finance and Treasurer*        |
|   |                  | *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
No. 59021.

protests 232596-K, 234594-K, and 234927-K (New York).

#### Astoria Pan Americana, Inc., and J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ficin powder or *leche de oje en polvo*the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Astoria Pan-Americana, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 243, C. D. 1608), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 55978.

protest 160436-K (New York).

#### Belmont Smelting & Refining Works, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “ferrous or nonferrous materials or articles of which ferrous or nonferrous metal is the component material of chief value which are second-hand or waste or refuse or are obsolete, defective or damaged, and which are fit only to be remanufactured,” the claim for free entry under paragraph 301, as amended, *supra,*was sustained.
#### Edward Joy Company, Inc., Appellant, v McGuire & Bennett, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[634 NYS2d 266]

—Mikoll, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Relihan, Jr., J.), entered March 16,1995 in Tompkins County, which granted certain defendants’ motion to vacate that portion of plaintiff’s note of issue demanding a jury trial.

Plaintiff originally commenced this lawsuit in Onondaga County, joining three causes of action for breach of contract against defendant McGuire & Bennett, Inc., a general contractor, with a cause of action against all defendants seeking foreclosure of plaintiff’s mechanic’s lien filed in connection with work performed by plaintiff on property owned by defendant Ithaca College. Following a motion by defendants for a change of venue, it was ultimately determined by the Fourth Department that the proper venue for the action is Tompkins County, the location of the real property against which plaintiff filed the mechanic’s lien (199 AD2d 1015). Upon plaintiff’s filing of a note of issue containing a jury demand, defendants moved to *892vacate the note of issue on the ground of, *inter alia,*their assertion that plaintiff is not entitled to a jury trial on its claims. Supreme Court granted defendants’ motion to the extent of striking the jury demand from plaintiff’s note of issue. Plaintiff now appeals.

There must be an affirmance. Supreme Court correctly held that by joining legal and equitable causes of action arising out of the same transaction, plaintiff waived its right to a trial by jury *(see, Di Menna v Cooper & Evans Co.,*220 NY 391, 396; *Mirasola v Gilman,*104 AD2d 932; *Cowper Co. v Buffalo Hotel Dev. Venture,*99 AD2d 19, 21; *see also,*Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C4102:6, at 212). We have examined the various arguments advanced by plaintiff urging us to reach a different result and find them to be unpersuasive.

Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
notice of entry pertaining to a purported order dismissing Platte River, the

order attached to the notice of entry bore no district court file stamp.

Both appellant and respondent responded to our order to show cause, asserting that the claims against Patton were orally dismissed by stipulation on October 2, 2013. But as no written stipulation or order has been filed, the oral stipulation remains ineffective for final judgment purposes. NRCP 41(a); 

### Div. Child & Family Servs. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 451, 92 P.3d 1239, 1243 (2004). Appellant also asserts that Platte River was dismissed by district court order, but the order attached to its response, like that attached to its docketing statement, bears no district court stamp. As a result, that order is ineffective. 

### See NRCP 58; 

### Div. Child & Family Servs., 120 Nev. at 451, 92 P.3d at 1243. Thus, it appears that the district court has not yet entered a final judgment resolving all of the claims against all of the parties below. As a result, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

# R ekvi J. Pickering

1824—ACi r j- Parraguirre Saitta

cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge William C. Turner, Settlement Judge Royal & Miles, LLP Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A el.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RIPPEY COMMERCIAL LLC, 

a California Limited

Liability Co., CIV. S-04-2743-DFL-GGH

 

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER RE DISPOSITION AFTER

 NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

W.G. GRINDERS FRANCHISE, INC., 

an Ohio Corporation, and 

CONSTANCE S. BELLISARI, an

individual, 

Defendants. 

 /

The court has been advised by Thomas E. Moore, III Esq.,

that this action has been settled. Therefore, it is not

necessary that the action remain upon the court's active

calendar. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 

1. That counsel file settlement/dismissal documents, in

Case 2:04-cv-02743-DFL-GGH Document 9 Filed 04/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160, no later

than May 17, 2005, and,

2. That all hearing dates previously set in this matter

are vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 4/26/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02743-DFL-GGH Document 9 Filed 04/27/05 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Linda Lee, Appellant, v James Lee, Respondent, and Dennis C. Vacco, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Intervenor-Respondent.

[635 NYS2d 569]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner contends that Family Court should not have sustained respondent’s objections to the Hearing Examiner’s support order and remitted the matter to the Hearing Examiner for a rehearing. Because the subsequent support order of the Hearing Examiner, which has not been appealed, renders petitioner’s contention academic *(see generally, Matter of GoldGreenberger v Human Resources Admin.,*77 NY2d 973, 974; *Sedita v Board of Educ.,*43 NY2d 827, 828), the appeal is dismissed as moot. (Appeal from Order of Livingston County Family Court, Cicoria, J.—Child Support.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Chartwell Technology Inc. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Darold Parken, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
          aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of all the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Darold H. Parken
Darold H. Parken
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------

April 23, 2003
P. 1


# RCRA Box 1883 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 5 ) ll-B-16 6 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/3/200810:42:10AM

Sheet 5of 171P. 2 

## A-90-1 9 ll-B-166 PENDIN GCONFIDENTIA L

Th e followin g informatio ni s locate d i nth e cbnTidentia l file s o f th e Director , Emissio nStandard s Division , Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlannin g and Standards , U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a 27711 . Thi s informatio n i s confidentia l pendin g fina l determinatio nb yth e Administrato r and i s no t availabl e fo r publi c inspection . W . Floyd , Radia nCorporation , t o Proces s Vent s Docke t A-90-19 , Decembe r 1991 , HONNESHAP : Industr y Characteristics/Dipheny l Oxide . 1 6 pages . CB I Documen t Contro l No . 86/23 , PPS-166 .
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LESHANE J HOLMES, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2377 LKK KJM P

vs.

JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff

seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On June 9, 2005, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the

complaint on several defendants. Process directed to defendant Hernandez was returned

unserved because he could not be found at the address provided by plaintiff. Plaintiff must

provide additional information to serve this defendant. Plaintiff shall promptly seek such

information through discovery, the California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov’t. Code § 6250 

et seq., or other means available to plaintiff. If access to the required information is denied or

unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may seek judicial intervention.

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02377-JKS-EFB Document 25 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff a USM-285 form, along

with an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed November 5, 2004;

2. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and

submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following

documents:

a. One completed USM-285 form; and

b. Two copies of the endorsed complaint filed November 5, 2004.

DATED: May 8, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

holm2377.8e

Case 2:04-cv-02377-JKS-EFB Document 25 Filed 05/09/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LESHANE J. HOLMES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-04-2377 LKK KJM P 

vs.

JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 1 completed USM-285 form

 2 copies of the 11/5/04 

 Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-02377-JKS-EFB Document 25 Filed 05/09/06 Page 3 of 3
# C_2007135EN.01000401.xml

| 19.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/4

---

List of organisations recognised on the basis of Council Directive 94/57/EC on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for relevant activities of maritime administrations

(2007/C 135/04)

| — | American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) |
| --- | --- |

—

American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)

| — | Bureau Veritas (BV) |
| --- | --- |

—

Bureau Veritas (BV)

| — | China Classification Society (CCS) |
| --- | --- |

—

China Classification Society (CCS)

| — | Det Norske Veritas (DNV) |
| --- | --- |

—

Det Norske Veritas (DNV)

| — | Germanischer Lloyd (GL) |
| --- | --- |

—

Germanischer Lloyd (GL)

| — | Korean Register of Shipping (KR) |
| --- | --- |

—

Korean Register of Shipping (KR)

| — | Lloyd's Register of Shipping (LR) |
| --- | --- |

—

Lloyd's Register of Shipping (LR)

| — | Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (NK) |
| --- | --- |

—

Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (NK)

| — | Registro Italiano Navale (RINA) |
| --- | --- |

—

Registro Italiano Navale (RINA)

| — | Russian Maritime Register of Shipping (RS) |
| --- | --- |

—

Russian Maritime Register of Shipping (RS)

| — | Hellenic Register of Shipping (HRS) (1)
   (2) |
| --- | --- |

—

Hellenic Register of Shipping (HRS) (1)
   (2)

1

2

| — | Registro Internacional Naval, SA (RINAVE) (3) |
| --- | --- |

—

Registro Internacional Naval, SA (RINAVE) (3)

3

| — | Polish Register of Shipping (PRS) (4) |
| --- | --- |

—

Polish Register of Shipping (PRS) (4)

4

---

(1)  Commission Decision 2005/623/EC OJ L 219, 24.8.2005. p. 43. Community recognition with effect for Greece and Cyprus and valid for a period of three years as from the date of adoption of this Decision.

1

(2)  Commission Decision 2006/382/EC OJ L 151, 6.6.2006. p. 31. Community recognition with effects for Malta and valid until 3 August 2008.

2

(3)  Commission Decision 2005/311/EC OJ L 99, 19.4.2005. p. 15. Community recognition with effects for Portugal and valid for a period of three years as from the date of adoption of this Decision.

3

(4)  Commission Decision 2006/660/EC OJ L 272, 3.10.2006. p. 17. Community recognition with effects for Czech Republic, Cyprus, Lithuania, Malta and the Slovak Republic. and valid for a period of three years as from the date of adoption of this Decision.

4

---
EXHIBIT 5



| |  |                                                                                                                                       
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Deloitte LLP
Brookfield Place 181 Bay Street
Suite 1400
Toronto ON M5J 2V1
Canada  Tel: 416-601-6150 Fax: 416-601-6151 www.deloitte.ca

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos. 333-90920, 333-105310 and 333-151733 on Form S-8 and to the use of our reports dated February 12, 2014 relating
to the consolidated financial statements of Sun Life Financial Inc. (the Company) and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2013.

/S/ Deloitte LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants, Chartered Accountants

Licensed Public Accountants

February 12, 2014