alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4108]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice of intention to remove certain questions from proposed 
IPEDS survey.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the 
Department of Education published on January 24, 2007, a Notice of 
Proposed Information Collection Requests in the Federal Register on 
Page 3119, Column 1 (72 FR 3119). That document invited public comment 
for a period of 60 days on the proposed information collection 
entitled, ``Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), 
Web-Based Collection System''. The Department has received comments 
regarding some of the new questions included for the first time in this 
proposed IPEDS Information Collection Request (ICR). The Secretary has 
taken these comments into consideration and decided to revise the 
proposed collection by removing some of the new items proposed for this 
annual data collection. The Department will continue to take comment on 
the proposed IPEDS ICR during the remainder of the initial 60-day 
comment period and will post the revised IPEDS ICR on the Web site the 
Department uses to take comment. The current proposed IPEDS ICR and the 
revised proposed IPEDS ICR are and will be available at http://edicsweb.ed.gov. After posting the revised ICR, the Department will 
publish the required second PRA notice, providing an opportunity for an 
additional 30-day public comment period. The IC Clearance Official, 
Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, 
hereby issues this notice under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

    Dated: March 2, 2007.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, 
Office of Management.
[FR Doc. E7-4108 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
(Reap. Dec. 8253)

#### S. Stern Henry *&*Co. v. United States

Entry No. 705110.

(Decided October 1, 1953)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, of the item of 478 hoods invoiced at $24.01 per dozen was in fact $24.01 per dozen net packed and that the foreign value thereof was no higher. This case is hereby submitted.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the item of 478 hoods invoiced at $24.01 per dozen, and that such value was $24.01 per dozen net packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 10436)

#### Bruno NY, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 500330, etc.

(Decided January 22, 1963)

*ShaiTetts, Paley é Carter for the*plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> *378IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise which is the subject of the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of phonograph records exported from Mexico January 1, 1960.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that phonograph records are not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and are subject to' appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the prices shown on Schedule A, hereto' attached and made a part hereof for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the phonograph records in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the prices shown on schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

I, David D. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of Koss Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   September 2, 2011 |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| /s/   David D. Smith           |   |
|                           |   |
| David   D. Smith               |   |
| Executive   Vice President and |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer      |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code), I, S. Jeffrey Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of Cano Petroleum, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 12, 2010

/s/ S. JEFFREY JOHNSON S. Jeffrey Johnson Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
## Policy

              - FDIC’s Plans to Review Existing Regulations for Continued Effectiveness
              - FDIC Law, Regulations & Related Acts
              - Financial Institution Letters
              - Deposit Insurance Assessment Appeals: Guidelines & Decisions
              - Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations: Guidelines & Decisions
              - FDIC Federal Register Citations
              - Public Comments to the FDIC
              - Statement of Policy on Qualifications for Failed Bank Acquisitions - Questions and Answers
              - Resolution Authority News & Information
              - Important Banking Laws
              - Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act (EGRPRA)

## Delegations of Authority

              - Board Resolution and Matrices

## Appointment of Administrative Law Judges

              - Appointment of Administrative Law Judges

PDF Help - Information on downloading and using the PDF reader.

Last Updated: August 31, 2023
Exhibit 32.1

 

KINDER MORGAN, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), theundersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

     (1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated:  March 4, 2005 |  | /s/ Richard D.    Kinder                                                            |
|---------------------------------|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |  | Richard D. Kinder    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer      and President |

----

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Nine Months Ended
    
    
    Year Ended December 31,September 30, 2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Fixed charges (1):Interest expense
    
    $
    619,694
    
    
    $
    606,725
    
    
    $
    185,935
    
    
    $
    79,053
    
    
    $
    39,956
    
    
    $
    13,974Interest capitalized
    
    
    278
    
    
    
    414
    
    
    
    932
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    1,244
    
    
    
    1,327
    
    
    
    1,244
    
    
    
    1,494
    
    
    
    843
    
    
    
    429Total fixed charges
    
    $
    621,216
    
    
    $
    608,466
    
    
    $
    188,111
    
    
    $
    80,547
    
    
    $
    40,799
    
    
    $
    14,403Earnings:Net income before noncontrolling 
interest expenses
and income taxes
    
    $
    255,356
    
    
    $
    350,749
    
    
    $
    269,072
    
    
    $
    205,421
    
    
    $
    132,480
    
    
    $
    41,582Fixed charges
    
    
    621,216
    
    
    
    608,466
    
    
    
    188,111
    
    
    
    80,547
    
    
    
    40,799
    
    
    
    14,403Less: Interest capitalized
    
    
    (278
    )
    
    
    (414
    )
    
    
    (932
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total earnings
    
    $
    876,294
    
    
    $
    958,801
    
    
    $
    456,251
    
    
    $
    285,968
    
    
    $
    173,279
    
    
    $
    55,985Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.4
    x
    
    
    1.6
    x
    
    
    2.4
    x
    
    
    3.6
    x
    
    
    4.2
    x
    
    
    3.9
    x
 
 (1)
    
    Excludes interest related to the application of FIN 48
IT

- -- . . - . .. : ~ ;. - , . 

# Memorandum u.s. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation Subject:

From : Notice of Communication in case:

Docket DOT -OST -2013-0204 Anthony R. FOX-~ Secretary ofTr~ Date : February 26,2015 Reply to Reese Davidson Attn . of : x68161 To: Chief, Dockets In accordance with Department practice, I am reporting the following communication. During a telephone call on January 30, 2015, Violeta BuIe, the European Commissioner for Transport, raised the application of Norwegian Air International Limited (NAI) pending before DOT. Commissioner BuIe stated that NAI is entitled to a decision with minimum procedural delay under the U.S . -EU aviation agreement and that the carrier's application should be approved without further delay. She also offered the EU's assistance in helping the Department achieve that objective . Because NAI's application is part of an ongoing proceeding, I did not discuss the merits of the case and a summary of the conversation is being placed in the docket. Please place this memorandum in Docket DOT -OST -2013-0204. cc: Commissioner Violeta BuIe
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Garcia, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 1007]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeLury, J.), rendered June 14, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), and grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review the issue of the legal sufficiency of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Johnson,*185 AD2d 247). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Curative Health Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
Axmacher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                             /s/ Thomas Axmacher
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                 Thomas Axmacher
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 May 10, 2004
Attachment I

Re: **Final Performance Report (FPR) and SF 425 Federal**  **Financial Report ( F**  **FR)** for Graduate Assistance of Areas in National Need (GAANN) Grant Number XXXX Dear Project Director : In accordance with Section 75.118 of the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) and Section 648.66 of the GAANN Program Regulations, recipients of a GAANN grant are required to submit a **FPR** and **F F**  **R** 90 day s after the expiration of a the grant. Starting XXXX, the FPR online sy stem will be available for you to input and submit your FPR. You will receive additional information needed to access the s ys tem when it opens **Please note that the deadline for submitting the FPR is XXXX**  **.** The F F R, also called the SF 425 , must be submitted to this office by XXXX. Please have your grants and contracts office, or the appropriate office email this document to XXXX. Please be aware that f

ailure to submit either the Final Performance Report or the SF 425 in a timely manner will result in your grant being closed in non
- compliance and may jeopardize any future funding requests submitted by your institution
. If you have an y questions, please contact XXXX or XXXX or by e - mail at OPE_GAANN_Program@ed.gov
. Sincerel y,

XXXX
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

**(Section 302 Certification)**

 

I, Timothy P. Walbridge, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of 1st Centennial Bancorp; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 24, 2004 

 

/s/ Timothy P. Walbridge

President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.9


 


Director Fee Arrangements for 2014


 


Each director of MutualFirst Financial, Inc. (the “Company”)
also is a director of MutualBank. For 2014, each non-employee director will receive an annual fee of $29,500 for serving on MutualBank’s
Board of Directors as well as a Board meeting fee of $200 per meeting attended. In addition to this annual fee, Wilbur R. Davis
will receive a $6,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors, Linn Crull will receive a $5,000 annual fee
for serving as Chairman of the Audit Committee, Jerry McVicker will receive a $3,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the
Compensation Committee and Jon Kintner will receive a $3,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Trust Management Committee.
Directors are not compensated for their service on the Company’s Board of Directors.


 


MutualBank maintains deferred compensation
arrangements with some directors that previously allowed them to defer all or a portion of their Board fees in order to receive
income when they are no longer active directors. Previously deferred amounts earn interest at the rate of 10 percent per year.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELLIS CLAY HOLLIS,

Petitioner,

v.

DAVID L. RUNNELS, Warden,

Respondent.

CV S-04-2574 MCE GGH P

ORDER

Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that Respondent’s response to Petitioner’s first

amended petition for writ of habeas corpus be filed on or before February 18, 2006.

Dated: 1/13/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

holl2574.po

Case 2:04-cv-02574-MCE -GGH Document 31 Filed 01/13/06 Page 1 of 1
Case Wo. 8,454.

#### LOCOMOTIVE ENGINE SAFETY TRUCK CO. v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

[See Case No. 8,453].
Before the Second Division,

August 22, 1945

No. 50421.

#### Protests 18342-K, etc., of Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J,

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WHITE LAKE MUTUAL WATER CO.,

NO. CIV. S-04-2565 LKK/DAD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE DISPOSAL

DOCUMENTS AFTER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

Defendant.

 /

AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM.

/

Counsel for defendant/counter-claimant has informed the court

that the parties have settled the above-captioned case. The court

now orders that the dispositional documents disposing of the case

be filed no later than sixty (60) days from the effective date of

this order.

All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby

VACATED.

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-02565-LKK -DAD Document 12 Filed 07/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO

CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 13, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02565-LKK -DAD Document 12 Filed 07/13/05 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0322

IN THE MATTER OF:

E.W.,

Respondent and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Respondent and Appellant in 

this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of 

the date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of 

record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the 

Appellate Defender Division’s Office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give 

notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the 

Respondent and Appellant at her last known address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 24 2023

07/24/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0322