alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of National Residential Properties, Inc.
(the "COMPANY") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the SEC on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I hereby certify, in my capacity
as an officer of the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



October 27, 2004


                             By:/s/RICHARD ASTROM
                                ---------------------------
                             Richard Astrom
                             Chief Executive Officer


In connection with the annual report of National Residential Properties, Inc.
(the "COMPANY") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the SEC on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I hereby certify, in my capacity
as an officer of the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                             By: /s/CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
                                ---------------------------
                             Christopher Astrom
                             Chief Financial Officer


October 27, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11343-11344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-200-168]


CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Negotiated 
Rate Filing

March 7, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 27, 2007, CenterPoint Energy Gas 
Transmission Company (CEGT) tendered for filing and approval an amended 
negotiated rate agreement between CEGT and Constellation Energy 
Commodities Group, Inc. CEGT has entered into the amended agreement to 
provide amended firm transportation service to this shipper under Rate 
Schedule FT to be effective March 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c1878493828eafada8afa492b4b1b1aeb3b581a7a4b3a2efa6aeb7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="53151601101c3d3f3a3d36002623233c212713353621307d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>, or call

[[Page 11344]]

(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4490 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Rochester, Respondent, v Birchwood Court Owners, Inc., Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 476]

—Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), entered July 7, 1995.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice DiNoto at the Supreme Court. Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1719

GREGORY YELEKPU WIRBA,

Petitioner,

versus

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A98-166-823)

Submitted: November 14, 2007 Decided: December 14, 2007

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and Henry F. FLOYD, United

States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting

by designation.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kell Enow, LAW OFFICES OF ENOW AND PATCHA, Silver Spring, Maryland,

for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M.

Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Laurie Snyder, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Yelekpu Wirba, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s

(IJ) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). 

To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility

for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was

so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the

requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.

478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and

conclude that Wirba fails to show that the evidence compels a

contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Wirba cannot

meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of removal.

Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v.

Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Further, we find that

Wirba did not establish eligibility for protection under CAT. See

8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2007). Finally, Wirba’s claim that the

IJ and Board erred in finding that Wirba filed a frivolous asylum

application is without merit. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1158(d)(4), (6)

(West 2005); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.20 (2007). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
- 3 -

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0059 - EN

*|*

# 52007AP0059

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2007 on the proposal for a Council regulation derogating from Regulation (EC) No 2597/97 as regards drinking milk produced in Estonia (COM(2007)0048 - C6-0076/2007 - 2007/0021(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 301 E , 13/12/2007 P. 0043 - 0044 *

P6_TA(2007)0059

Drinking milk produced in Estonia *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2007 on the proposal for a Council regulation derogating from Regulation (EC) No 2597/97 as regards drinking milk produced in Estonia (COM(2007)0048 — C6-0076/2007 — 2007/0021(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2007)0048) [1],

- having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0076/2007),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A6-0051/2007),

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4627 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4627

 To authorize additional appropriations for fiscal year 2025 for solid 
          waste disposal systems of the Army, with an offset.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2024

  Mr. Welch (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize additional appropriations for fiscal year 2025 for solid 
          waste disposal systems of the Army, with an offset.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Burn Pit Elimination Act''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS OF THE ARMY.

    (a) In General.--The amount otherwise authorized to be appropriated 
for fiscal year 2025 for Other Procurement, Army, shall be increased by 
$8,950,000, with the amount of such increase to be available for solid 
waste disposal systems.
    (b) Offset.--The amount otherwise authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal year 2025 for Operations and Maintenance, Army, Additional 
Activities, Overseas Operating Costs, shall be reduced by $8,950,000, 
with the amount of such reduction to be derived from amounts for the 
use of open-air burn pits in contingency operations.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 1 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 2 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 3 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 4 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 5 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 6 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 7 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 8 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 9 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 10 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 11 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 12 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 13 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 14 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 15 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 16 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 17 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 18 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 19 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 20 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 21 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 22 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 23 of 24Case 2:04-cv-02634-LKK-DAD Document 121 Filed 07/02/10 Page 24 of 24
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT PAUL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1489 DFL GGH P

vs.

T. GUZMAN, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has separately issued an order addressing the second amended

complaint filed March 8, 2006. In this order, the court found that the second amended complaint

failed to state a colorable claim for relief against defendant Carey. For the reasons stated in that

order, the court now recommends that the claims against defendant Carey be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the claims against

defendant Carey be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

Case 2:04-cv-01489-FCD-CMK Document 19 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: 6/23/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

paul1589.57

Case 2:04-cv-01489-FCD-CMK Document 19 Filed 06/23/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Granting Request for Extension of Time to Serve Responses to Discovery Requests

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

JAMES E. FLYNN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

CONSTANCE L. PICCIANO, State Bar No. 66172

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 322-6453

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Ramos, McKee, Lea,

Gauthreaux, Johnson, Mathews, Chastain, Wheeler, 

Cade and Mini

48149286 SA2005100283

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

STEVEN A. MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

L. VILES, et al.,

Defendants.

CIV S-04-0756 LKK JFM P

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO

SERVE RESPONSES TO

INTERROGATORIES,

ADMISSIONS, AND REQUEST

FOR PRODUCTION OF

DOCUMENTS

The Court, having considered defendants’ request for an extension of time to serve

responses to plaintiff’s interrogatories, requests for admissions and request for production of

documents, and good cause having been found:

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-00756-LKK -JFM Document 29 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Granting Request for Extension of Time to Serve Responses to Discovery Requests

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant shall be granted an extension of time, to and

including August 10, 2005, to complete and serve defendant’s responses.

DATED: July 14, 2005.

mart0756.36

Case 2:04-cv-00756-LKK -JFM Document 29 Filed 07/15/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 47872.

#### Protests 818972-G, etc., of E. B. Baehr & Sons (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 41633 the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils was sustained.
No. 46164.

#### Protest 838007-G of Spiegel Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of spring hand scales in chief value of metal. In accordance therewith and on the authority of Abstract 38504 the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, March 8, 2007 at 2 p.m. ET. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Inez De Jesus at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7977. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Thursday, March 8, 2007 at 2 p.m. ET via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write Inez De Jesus, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Inez De Jesus. Ms. De Jesus can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include: Various IRS issues. 

 Dated: February 13, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E7-2934 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ LEO F. WELLS, III                                  
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive
Officer May 5, 2005  
|                                                       
|/s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial
Officer May 5, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH STEVEN THOMASON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1996 GEB KJM P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his July 1, 2002 convictions for assault

with a deadly weapon and threatening to inflict great bodily injury and the finding that he had

suffered prior felony convictions. 

By an order filed May 5, 2005, the original petition was dismissed because it

contained both exhausted and unexhausted claims and petitioner’s request for a stay in order to

complete exhaustion was denied. On May 31, 2005, petitioner filed an amended petition

containing only the exhausted claim and a request for information on how to proceed once the

California Supreme Court has acted on his exhaustion petition, which the court will interpret as a

renewed request for a stay.

Petitioner has alleged that the claims now pending in the California courts were

not exhausted earlier because appellate counsel refused to raise them; petitioner has shown cause

Case 2:04-cv-01996-GEB -KJM Document 8 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

for his failure to exhaust earlier. The claims themselves include judicial bias and prosecutorial

misconduct, including a violation of the duty under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); the

court cannot find that these claims are “plainly meritless.” Rhines v. Weber, U.S. , 125

S.Ct. 1528, 1535 (2005). 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Petitioner’s May 31, 2005 request for a stay of proceedings is granted;

2. Within ninety days of the date of this order, petitioner shall file a status report

on the progress of the state exhaustion petition.

3. If the state exhaustion proceeding is not completed within one hundred eighty

days of the date of this order, petitioner shall file a second status report, and further reports at

ninety day intervals until the exhaustion process is completed.

4. Within thirty days of the California Supreme Court’s resolution of the state

action, petitioner shall file a motion to lift the stay together with either a motion to dismiss the

action or a motion to file a second amended petition, along with a copy of the proposed second

amended petition.

5. Petitioner is advised his failure to comply with the time limits of this order

may result in an order lifting the stay.

DATED: July 28, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

thom1996.sty

Case 2:04-cv-01996-GEB -KJM Document 8 Filed 07/29/05 Page 2 of 2