alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0060 - EN

*|*

# 52007AP0060

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2007 on the proposal for a Council regulation repealing Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 on budgetary discipline (COM(2006)0448 - C6-0277/2006 - 2006/0151(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 301 E , 13/12/2007 P. 0044 - 0044 *

P6_TA(2007)0060

Repeal of Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 on budgetary discipline *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2007 on the proposal for a Council regulation repealing Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 on budgetary discipline (COM(2006)0448 — C6-0277/2006 — 2006/0151(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2006)0448) [1],

- having regard to Articles 37, 279 and 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0277/2006),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A6-0056/2007),

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
Before the First Division,

September 27, 1949

No. 53582.

protest 27802-K (New York).

#### Gerstenzang Werner Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads, composed of galalith, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gerstenzang Werner Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 97, C. D. 1136), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
-1- 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sharon L. Kinsey, (SBN 187285) 

KINSEY CONSUMER LAW CENTER 

16400 Bonney Road 

Watsonville Ca. 95076 

Telephone: (831) 274-2417 

Facsimile: (831) 274-2512 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ROBERT BARABINO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

CALIFORNIA EASTERN DISTRICT - SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

ROBERT BARABINO, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

DAN GAMEL, INC.; FLEETWOOD 

ENTERPRISES, INC., FLEETWOOD 

MOTOR HOMES OF PA., INC. 

Defendants. 

Case No.:2:04-cv-2359 MCE PAN 

ORDER 

For Good Cause Shown, 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s attorney, Sharon Kinsey is permitted to appear at 

the hearing scheduled before this Court in Dept. 3 on April 3, 2006 by telephone. The 

Court will contact Ms. Kinsey at the time of the hearing at the following telephone 

number: 831-274-2417 

Dated: March 27, 2006

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-02359-MCE-EFB Document 54 Filed 03/27/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ESSEX
PORTFOLIO, L.P. REPORT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          18,276
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,312
<PP&E>                                         927,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 920,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,877
<BONDS>                                        360,508
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     497,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   920,234
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,171
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   930
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,333
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,333
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    806
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,527
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9617-9618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3659]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 242

RIN 0750-AH52

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; DoD Voucher 
Processing (DFARS Case 2011-D054)

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Proposed rule; clarification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is clarifying the rule published on January 19, 2012, 
proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) to update DoD's voucher processing procedures and 
better accommodate the use of Wide Area WorkFlow to process vouchers.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule published January 19, 2012, at 77 
FR 2682, continue to be accepted until March 19, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Gomersall, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), Room 3B855, 
3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 703-602-
0302; facsimile 703-602-0350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD is clarifying the proposed rule 
published on January 19, 2012 (77 FR 2682), which proposes to revise 
requirements for approving interim vouchers. Interim vouchers that are 
selected using risk-based sampling methodologies will be reviewed and 
approved by the contract auditors for provisional payment and sent to 
the disbursing office after the pre-payment review. Interim vouchers 
not selected for a pre-payment review will be considered acceptable for 
payment and will be sent directly to the disbursing office. All interim 
vouchers are subject to an audit of actual costs incurred after 
payment. The sampling process will be accomplished largely within the 
Wide Area WorkFlow system.
    The rule proposes to revise the requirements for approving interim 
vouchers by replacing the direct submission process currently 
referenced

[[Page 9618]]

at DFARS 242.803(b)(i)(C) with a risk-based sampling process. The 
proposed risk-based sampling process is a more effective and efficient 
approach. It allows for the evaluation of selected interim vouchers on 
a pre-payment basis in lieu of the current direct submission 
authorization, which does not allow for the pre-payment evaluation of 
higher risk interim vouchers. It is anticipated that the revised 
process will provide a more comprehensive sample of all vouchers and an 
enhanced oversight of higher risk vouchers, while allowing a more 
efficient processing of the vouchers not selected for pre-payment 
review.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 242

    Government procurement.

Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2012-3659 Filed 2-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
EXHIBIT 31.2


I,  Lawrence Schaffer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Case Financial, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  company,  including  its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  company's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's  internal  control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.



                                                     /s/ Lawrence Schaffer
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     Lawrence Schaffer
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     January 23, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 476 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 476

   To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to protect access to 
                   genetically targeted technologies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2023

Mr. Menendez (for himself and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to protect access to 
                   genetically targeted technologies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Maintaining Investments in New 
Innovation Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO DEFINITION OF QUALIFYING SINGLE SOURCE DRUG.

    Section 1192(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320f-1(e)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(A)(ii), by inserting ``(or, in the 
        case of an advanced drug product (as defined in paragraph (4)), 
        11 years)'' after ``7 years''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Advanced drug product defined.--For purposes of 
        paragraph (1)(A)(ii), the term `advanced drug product' means a 
        drug that incorporates or utilizes a genetically targeted 
        technology (as defined in section 529A(c)(2) of the Federal 
        Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) that may result in the modulation 
        (including suppression, up-regulation, or activation) of the 
        function of a gene or its associated gene product.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to continue hearing 1

GEORGE FORMAN (SBN 047822)

KIMBERLY A. CLUFF (SBN 139136)

FORMAN & ASSOCIATES

4340 Redwood Highway, Suite F228

San Rafael, CA 94903

Telephone: 415/491-2310

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CACHIL DEHE BAND OF WINTUN INDIANS

OF THE COLUSA INDIAN COMMUNITY, a

federally recognized Indian Tribe, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA

GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION, an

agency of the State of California; and ARNOLD

SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of

California,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CIV.S 04-2265 FCD KJM

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

HEARING ON DEFENDANTS'

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS, AND ORDER THEREON

DATE: May 5, 2006

TIME: 10:00 a.m.

COURTOOM: 2

Judge: Frank C. Damrell, Jr.

Trial Date: September 19, 2006

Action Filed: October 25, 2004

Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings currently is set for hearing on May 5, 2006

at 10:00 a.m. To accommodate plaintiff's counsel's schedule, the parties have agreed that the hearing

on this motion may be continued until May 19, 2006, or if that date is unavailable, to the next

available date. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and requested by the parties, through their respective counsel,

that the hearing on defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings now set for May 5, 2006 at

10:00 a.m. be continued until May 19, 2006 at 10:00 a.m., or such later date as the Court may deem

convenient, in order to accommodate a conflict in plaintiffs' counsel's schedule. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-02265-FCD-KJN Document 15 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to continue hearing 2

Dated: April 20, 2006 By: /s/ George Forman 

George Forman

FORMAN & ASSOCIATES

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: April 20, 2006 By: /s/ Christine Murphy 

Bill Lockyer 

Attorney General

Christine Murphy

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

The parties hereto having stipulated to the continuance of the hearing on defendants' motion

for judgment on the pleadings until May 19, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

U.S. District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02265-FCD-KJN Document 15 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of Jafra Worldwide Holdings (Lux)
S.àR.L. (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Ronald B. Clark                                           
| |                                                               
| | Ronald B. Clark                                               
| | Chief Executive Officer of the Advisory Committee and Director

November 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Jafra Cosmetics International, Inc. and will be retained by it
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

57
No. 49673.

#### Protest 82803-K of Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Upon the established facts and following *United States*v. *Bosch Magneto Co.*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 569, T. D. 41434) and *Wedemeyer*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 141, C. D. 556) the bicycle horns in question were held to be parts of bicycles and therefore dutiable as claimed. Protest sustained to this extent.

Lawrence, J., not participating.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RENO RIOS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S 04-2349 FCD DAD P

vs.

CHIEF DIRECTOR FOR THE 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action. By

order filed January 5, 2006, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff

has requested an extension of time to file to file an amended complaint. Good cause appearing,

the request will be granted.

Plaintiff has also filed a second request for appointment of counsel. Plaintiff’s

first request was denied in the January 5, 2006 order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with leave

to amend. Plaintiff’s second request fails to demonstrate that exceptional circumstances are

present in this case. See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v.

Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The second request for appointment of

counsel will therefore be denied.

Case 2:04-cv-02349-ALA Document 12 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s January 23, 2006 request for appointment of counsel is denied;

2. Plaintiff’s January 23, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted; and

3. Plaintiff is granted sixty days from the date of this order in which to file an

amended complaint.

DATED: January 30, 2006.

DAD:13bb

rios2349.36w31

Case 2:04-cv-02349-ALA Document 12 Filed 01/30/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW VAUGHN,

NO. CIV. S-04-2528 LKK/KJM PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE DISPOSAL

DOCUMENTS AFTER

WAL-MART STORES, INC., NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

Defendant.

 /

Counsel for defendant has informed the court that the parties

have settled the above-captioned case. The court now orders that

the dispositional documents disposing of the case be filed no later

than thirty (30) days from the effective date of this order.

All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby

VACATED.

////

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-02528-LKK -KJM Document 22 Filed 05/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO

CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 18, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02528-LKK -KJM Document 22 Filed 05/20/05 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [UT-910-07-1120-PH-24-1A] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Department of Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Utah Resource Advisory Council (RAC) Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and The Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) Utah Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below. 

# DATES:

The Utah Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet May 1-2, 2007. 

# ADDRESSES:

On May 1, the RAC will meet at 10 a.m. at the Price Field Office of the BLM, 125 South 600 West, Price, Utah, for a field tour. On May 2, from 8 a.m. until 2 p.m., the RAC will be meeting at the Emery County Courthouse, 75 East Main, Castle Dale. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Contact Sherry Foot, Special Programs Coordinator,Utah State Office, Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 45155, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84145-0155; phone (801) 539-4195. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On May 1, the Utah BLM Resource Advisory Council will meet for a field tour of Nine Mile Canyon. Nine Mile Canyon was nominated as a National Register of Historic Places-Archaeologist District. Presentations on the history of the nomination, its resources and characteristics will be given. On May 2, the RAC will be given presentations from the Field Offices on recreation site fee proposals, an overview of Utah BLM issues, and an update on the Factory Butte temporary restriction order. A public comment period, where members of the public may address the RAC, is scheduled from 12:45 p.m.-1:15 p.m. Written comments may be sent to the Bureau of Land Management address listed above. All meetings are open to the public; however, transportation, lodging, and meals are the responsibility of the participating public. 

Dated: March 6, 2007. 

Selma Sierra, 

State Director.

 [FR Doc. E7-4418 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P