alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



KREISLER MANUFACTURING CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward A. Stern, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 24, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Edward A. Stern    
|                         |  |  |  | Edward A. Stern        
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



40
August 26, 1944

No. 49686.

Suit 4472.

#### Pink *Supply Co.*v. *United States.*

C. *D. 824*affirmed. C. A. D. 284.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES RAY WILEY, No. 2:04-cv-1922-MCE-KJM-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

CHERYL PLILER, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 19, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

Case 2:04-cv-01922-MCE -KJM Document 32 Filed 08/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 19, 2006 are adopted in full; and 

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied.

DATED: August 8, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01922-MCE -KJM Document 32 Filed 08/09/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 41796.

#### Protest 895713-G of American Moss Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

It was found that the plaintiff by the testimony of its witnesses established the correctness of its claim for free entry under paragraph 1688.
| [ X      ] | ANNUAL      REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF      1934 |
|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| OR                   |
|----------------------|
| [   ] | TRANSITION      REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF      1934 |

|             New      York             |              11-1978958                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (State      or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)                                                                                           | (I.R.S.      Employer Identification No.)                                                                                                                                                 |
| 145 Oser Avenue,      Hauppauge, New York                                                                                                                     |                 11788               |
| (Address      of principal executive offices)                                                                                                                 | (Zip      Code)                                                                                                                                                                           |

----

| Item      15. | Exhibits      and Financial Statement Schedules. |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------|

| 31.1 | Rule      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive      Officer. |
|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 31.2 | Rule      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial      Officer. |
|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 58049.

protests 173109-K and 176728-K (Norfolk).

#### The Hipage Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is composed of rush and is not of grass nor of rice straw; that merchandise of like character is now being assessed at 20 percent under said paragraph 1021, as modified, *supra;*and that the termination of the said General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade with respect to concessions therein initially negotiated with China (T. D. 52587), insofar as said paragraph 1021 is concerned, related only to floor coverings of grass or of rice straw. Upon the agreed statement of facts, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4401]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-339-000]


Texas Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

March 6, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 1, 2007, Texas Gas Transmission, LLC 
(Texas Gas) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets attached to the filing, to 
become effective April 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f1b7b4a3b2be9f9d989f94a28481819e8385b197948392df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2b4b7a0b1bd9c9e9b9c97a18782829d8086b294978091dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4401 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4053 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
No. 53558.

protest 132698-K (New York).

#### Prill Silver Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4540 

To enable passenger vessels that were not built in the United States to 

receive coastwise endorsement, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2024 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To enable passenger vessels that were not built in the United 

States to receive coastwise endorsement, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Jobs in 

5 American Ports Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COASTWISE ENDORSEMENT FOR PASSENGER VES7 SELS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 12112(a)(2)(B) of title 

9 46, United States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4540 IS

1 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘; or’’ and insert2 ing a semicolon; 

3 (2) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and in4 serting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(iv) is a vessel that transports pas7 sengers between ports or places in the 

8 United States to which the coastwise laws 

9 apply, either directly or via a foreign port; 

10 and’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 12121 of 

12 title 46, United States Code, is repealed. 

13 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in the 

14 amendments made by this section shall be construed to 

15 exempt a vessel that transports passengers between ports 

16 or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws 

17 apply, either directly or via a foreign port, from any appli18 cable law of the United States except as explicitly provided 

19 in such amendments. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 12 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarter  ended
September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper,
Jr.,  President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 19, 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CASE NO. CIV.S 04-1375 WBS JF

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, (State Bar No. 074414)

JULIA M. ADAMS, (State Bar No. 230795)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Ave.

San Francisco, CA 94l09

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SUSAN BOWMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SUSAN BOWMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

SOUTH TAHOE TRAVELODGE; KML

CORPORATION, a California corporation

formerly dba SOUTH TAHOE

TRAVELODGE and now dba HOWARD

JOHNSON EXPRESS INN LAKE

TAHOE,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CIV.S 04-1375 WBS 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”) herein, each party is to bear its own

costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511

U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of

settlement agreements).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

Case 2:04-cv-01375-WBS -JFM Document 9 Filed 10/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CASE NO. CIV.S 04-1375 WBS JF 2

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: October 12, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

 

By: /s/ Thomas E. Frankovich 

Thomas E. Frankovich

Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSAN BOWMAN

Dated: October 12, 2005 GORDON & REES

By: /s/ Michael D. Bruno 

Michael D. Bruno

Attorneys for Defendants SOUTH TAHOE

TRAVELODGE; KML CORPORATION, a

California corporation formerly dba SOUTH

TAHOE TRAVELODGE and now dba HOWARD

JOHNSON EXPRESS INN LAKE TAHOE

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: October 13, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-01375-WBS -JFM Document 9 Filed 10/14/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER LEE JENKINS, No. 2:04-cv-1152-MCE-GGH-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

J.G. ARCEO, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On April 18, 2006, the magistrate judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. 

Case 2:04-cv-01152-MCE -GGH Document 42 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Neither party has filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 18, 2006,

are adopted in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s claims against J. Valadez, Vincent Cullen,

Glen Riddle, V. Sanchez, J.G. Arceo, Tony Loftin, N. Grannis,

J.L. Schmidt, M. P. Gallagher, C. Semel, S. Ortiz, T. Surges,

James L. Deason, S.O. Kephart, B. Curry, L. H. Dizung, J. Valdez,

M. Veal, Crawford, Duncan, L. Buccinio, A. Swanson, Nadim K.

Khoury, P. Enriquez, Dizmang, J. M. August, D. L. Turner, Dr. H.

Hasheem, M. Hodges, Dr. Pacifico, Sgt. T. Winters, Joyce

Thompson, K.L. Kirpinsky, M. Hodges-Wilkens, F. Gonzalez, R.

Grenz, C/O Summers, Counselor Dominquez, Lance Jensen, C/O

Whitten, D. Shankland, J. Stocker, M. Bradley, J. Bick, R.

Meyers, D. Myers, R. Carney, M. Cry, Sgt. Goddard, Sgt. Stevens,

Dr. Beck, Robert McGahey, Dr. Diznang, Jeff Griffin, D. M.

Cornez, J.E. Boyd, Counselor Dominguez, Counselor Ochoa, C.

Buckley, Harley G. Lapin, C/O Furnari, C/O Guy, J.C. Sanders are

dismissed and these parties are dismissed as Defendants in this

action; and 

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01152-MCE -GGH Document 42 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

3. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants C/O Wilson, Sgt.

Pemberton, Sgt. Foster are dismissed with the exception of those

specific colorable claims set forth both in the Court’s December

12, 2005 Order and in the April 18, 2006 Order as to Defendants

Wilson, Pemberton and Foster.

DATED: July 6, 2006

_________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01152-MCE -GGH Document 42 Filed 07/07/06 Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cano Petroleum, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, S. Jeffrey Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company, as of , and for, the periods presented in the Report.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as anexhibit to the Form 10-QSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-Band Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 202 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and,accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 

 
| November 9, 2005 | /s/ S. Jeffrey Johnson  |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                  | S. Jeffrey Johnson      |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Before Judge Watson,

June 27, 1968

No. R68/26.

reappraisements R66/5978, etc. (New York).

#### Gehrig Hoban & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Gehrig Hoban & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 727, A.R.D. 210), the court found and held that the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Ac't of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the various items of perfumery here involved and that such values are as Stated in schedule “B”, said schedule “B” being attached to and made a part of the decision.
No. 58055.

protests 209472-K, etc. (New York).

#### Chekiang Co. and Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.