alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: August 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 162)]
[Notices]               
[Page 51751]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23au10-38]                         

[[Page 51751]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Jersey State 
Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, that a planning meeting of the New Jersey State 
Advisory Committee will convene at on September 21, 2010 at 11 a.m. at 
the Legislative Annex Building, 125 West State Street, Trenton, New 
Jersey 08625, Room 10. The purpose of the planning meeting is to 
discuss committee member suggestions for a briefing topic to be 
scheduled in FY 2011.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by October 21, 2010. 
Written comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite 740, 
Washington, DC 20425. They may be faxed to 202-376-7748, or e-mailed to 
ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact 
the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are directed to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or may contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, August 18, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-20831 Filed 8-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO SERVICES AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SERVICES AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 31st day of October, 2016, by and between Third Security, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (“THIRD SECURITY”), and Intrexon Corporation, a Virginia corporation
(“INTREXON”). 
 WHEREAS, THIRD SECURITY and INTREXON entered into that certain Services Agreement, dated as of
November 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), which shall expire on November 1, 2016, unless earlier terminated or extended by agreement of the parties pursuant to Section 4 of the Agreement; 

WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, THIRD SECURITY and INTREXON desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement to
January 1, 2017; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4 of the Agreement, this Amendment has been approved unanimously by
the disinterested directors of the INTREXON Board of Directors. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and
covenants herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties to this Amendment, intending to be bound hereby, agree as follows: 

1. Defined Terms. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the
Agreement. 
 2. Section 4. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting such section in its entirety
and substituting the following in its stead: 
 “4. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence
immediately upon the date hereof and continue until January 1, 2017 unless earlier terminated by agreement of the parties hereto. The Agreement may be extended on a year-to-year basis by agreement of the Parties, with INTREXON’s agreement
conditioned on the unanimous approval of the independent directors of INTREXON’s Board of Directors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement shall become terminable (i) at any time by INTREXON upon delivery of written notice to THIRD
SECURITY; and (ii) upon thirty (30) days’ notice by THIRD SECURITY upon delivery of written notice to INTREXON. The obligations in Sections 4, 8, 9, 10 and 11 shall survive termination of this
Agreement. 
 3. No Further Amendments. Except as specifically set forth herein, no amendments or modifications to the
Agreement are hereby effected, and the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 4. Counterparts. This Amendment may
be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed an original but all of which shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. 

[Signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first above
written. 
  

									
	THIRD SECURITY, LLC	 		 	INTREXON CORPORATION
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Marcus E. Smith
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Donald P. Lehr

	Name:	 	Marcus E. Smith	 		 	Name:	 	Donald P. Lehr
	Title:	 	Senior Managing Director and General Counsel	 		 	Title:	 	Chief Legal Officer
010-8080-3687/1/AMERICAS

May 12, 2015

VIA EMAIL

Mr. Robert Finamore

Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Polynesian Limited—Request for Thirty-Day Extension of Cabotage Operations, Docket

DOT-OST-2014-0144

Dear Mr. Finamore:

In accordance with the Department of Transportation’s Notice of Action Taken issued

February 26, 2015, in the captioned docket, I am writing on behalf of Polynesian Limited

(“Polynesian”) to request approval of an additional thirty days of cabotage operations between

Pago Pago and the Manu’a Islands, American Samoa. Polynesian requests approval of

cabotage operations through June 30, 2015.

The circumstances described in Polynesian’s application have not changed and

Polynesian’s application continues to meet the requirements of 49 USC 40109(g) for grant of

an emergency cabotage exemption. The Pago Pago-Manu’a Islands route remains without

U.S. carrier service. Polynesian is the only air carrier able to provide much needed

transportation between the two points, thus preventing severe hardship to American Samoa

residents. During the past several months Polynesian has performed medical evacuations

from the Manu’a Islands and also transported a large number of passengers between Pago

Pago and the Manu’a Islands, including government employees and engineers. There is a

clear need for continued service for an additional thirty days.

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

2550 M Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20037

charles.donley@squirepb.com

+1.202.626.6840
Mr. Robert Finamore

May 12, 2015

Page 2

010-8080-3687/1/AMERICAS

Please contact the undersigned with any questions.

Very truly yours,

Charles F. Donley II

cc: Office of the Governor

Executive Office Building, Third Floor, Utulei

Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799

Fax: 011 684-633-2269

perkmann@cooley.com

alex.sene.jr@gmail.com

steve.morrissey@united.com; dan.weiss@united.com

pdoell@naca.cc
#### Kim Y. Burgess et al., Respondents, v Greta M. Rains-ford et al., Defendants, and Mercy Hospital et al., Appellants.

[634 NYS2d 393]

—In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendants Patricia R. Latorre, Janet Matarazzo, Catherine Kenny, "John and Jane Does Nos. 1-20”, and Mercy Hospital appeal (1), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated August 9, 1994, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion to strike the answer insofar as interposed by the defendant Mercy Hospital, and (2) from an order of the same court, dated January 11, 1995, which, *inter alia,*denied their motion denominated as one for renewal and reargument.

*400Ordered that the appeal from the order dated January 11, 1995, and the appeal by the defendants Latorre, Matarazzo, Kenny, and "Doe” from the order dated August 9, 1994, are dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated August 9, 1994, is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendant Mercy Hospital; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiffs are awarded one bill of costs payable by the defendants Patricia R. Latorre, Janet Matarazzo, Catherine Kenny, "John and Jane Does Nos. 1-20”, and Mercy Hospital.

The record shows that the failure of the appellant Mercy Hospital to comply with the court’s order to meet the plaintiffs’ discovery demands was willful, contumacious, and in bad faith. Under the circumstances, the court properly granted the plaintiffs’ motion to strike its answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 *(see, e.g., Rodriguez v All Am. Auto Rental,*179 AD2d 632; *Ahroni v City of New York,*175 AD2d 789; *Dauria v City of New York,*127 AD2d 459, 460; *Sawh v Bridges,*120 AD2d 74, 78).

The appeal from the denial of the appellants’ motion, denominated as a motion for renewal and reargument, must be dismissed. The motion is actually one for reargument as it was not based upon new facts unavailable at the time of the original motion *(see, e.g., Huttner v McDaid,*151 AD2d 547). The denial of a motion for reargument is not appealable *(see, e.g., Huttner v McDaid, supra; Mgrditchian v Donato,*141 AD2d 513).

We note that since the order dated August 9, 1994, did not dismiss the answer insofar as asserted by the defendants Latorre, Matarazzo, Kenny, and "Doe”, they are not aggrieved by that order and may not appeal therefrom *(see,*CPLR 5511). Balletta, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-625 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CUSTOMS 

Assistance 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and AZERBAIJAN 

Signed at Baku February 7, 2007 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
AZERBAIJAN 

Customs: Assistance 

 Agreement signed at Baku February 7, 2007; 

 Entered into force June 25, 2007.
1

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

____________________________ 

Stipulation; Proposed Order 1

LAWRENCE BALL, State Bar No. 60496 

LOUIS A. HIGHMAN, State Bar No. 61703 

HIGHMAN, HIGHMAN & BALL 

A Professional Law Association 

870 Market Street, Suite 467 

San Francisco, CA 94l02 

Telephone: (4l5) 982-5563 

Facsimile: (415) 982-5202 

Attorneys for Plaintiff May Moran 

In the United States District Court 

In and for the Eastern District of California 

MAY MORAN, No. CIV.S -04-2461 DFL DAD 

 

 Plaintiff, STIPULATION; PROPOSED 

 -v- ORDER 

 

ALEX’S TRANSPORTATION, 

INC. 

 

 Defendant. 

 

___________________________________/ 

 Plaintiff May Moran and defendant Alex 

Transportation, Inc., by and through their respective 

attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree to the following: 

(1) The time for the parties to make expert witness 

disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) shall be 

continued from June 3, 2005 to July 5, 2005. 

(2) The time for the parties to make supplemental 

disclosures and disclosures of any rebuttal experts 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C) shall be continued 

Case 2:04-cv-02461-DFL-DAD Document 10 Filed 05/12/05 Page 1 of 2
 1

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

____________________________ 

Stipulation; Proposed Order 2

from June 17, 2005 to July 19, 2005. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: May 10, 2005. 

 HIGHMAN, HIGHMAN AND BALL 

 A Professional Law Association 

 By___/s/_________________________

 Lawrence Ball, 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff May Moran 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: May 10, 2005. 

 GRESHAM SAVAGE NOLAN & TILDEN 

 A Professional Corporation 

 By__/s/_______ _______________ 

 Robert J. Hicks, Attorney for 

 Alex Transportation, Inc. 

So Ordered. 

______________________________ 

DAVID F. LEVI 

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02461-DFL-DAD Document 10 Filed 05/12/05 Page 2 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 11656 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:12

- cr
- 00479

- JDW

- TBM

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus DAVID DWINELL, a.k.a. David J. Dwinell,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (April 18, 2014)
Before HULL , MARCUS , and MARTIN , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 13-11656 Date Filed: 04/18/2014 Page: 1 of 22 Kenneth S. Siegel, appointed counsel for David Dwinell in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the merit of the appeal is correct. We agree with Siegel that Dwinell’s guilty plea was knowing and intelligent, see United States v. Ternus , 598 F.3d 1251, 1254 (11th Cir. 2010), and find his sentence procedurally reasonable, see Gall v. United
States , 552 U.S. 38, 41, 128 S. Ct. 586, 597 (2007). We also examined the issue , missing from Siegel’s brief, of whether the district court plainly err ed by imposing a term of supervised release , and conclude it did not

. See United States v. Rodriguez , 627 F.3d 1372 , 1380 (11th Cir. 2010); United States v. Lejarde

- Rada , 319 F.3d 1288, 1291 (11th Cir. 2003). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED , and Dwin ell ’s conviction s and sentence s are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 13-11656 Date Filed: 04/18/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Case No. 14,456.

#### UNITED STATES v. The ANN.

[Cited in U. S. v. Arnold, Case No. 14.469. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11018-11019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4353]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-319-000]


Viking Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

March 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 28, 2007, Viking Gas Transmission 
Company (Viking) tendered for filing to be part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 5C, to become 
effective April 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public

[[Page 11019]]

Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' link on 
the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c68083948589a8aaafa8a395b3b6b6a9b4b286a0a3b4a5e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e9afacbbaaa6878580878cba9c9999869b9da98f8c9b8ac78e869f">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4353 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellant,

v.

BRUNO WILLIAM TYREE

,

Appellee. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 11

- 0026 0

- CR

Appeal from the

120 th District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 20110D01872 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is the State ’ s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to

TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2(a). Finding that the State has complied with the requirements of Rule

42.2(a), we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

April 18, 2012

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Antcliff, J.

( Do Not Publish)
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4689 

To remove aliens who fail to comply with a release order, to enroll all 

aliens on the ICE nondetained docket in the Alternatives to Detention 

program with continuous GPS monitoring, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11 (legislative day, JULY 10), 2024 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To remove aliens who fail to comply with a release order, 

to enroll all aliens on the ICE nondetained docket in 

the Alternatives to Detention program with continuous 

GPS monitoring, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for Jocelyn 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4689 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PARTICIPATION IN ALTERNATIVES 

2 TO DETENTION. 

3 No alien may be released as part of any program 

4 under the Alternatives to Detention program unless— 

5 (1) all detention beds available to the Secretary 

6 have been filled; 

7 (2) there exists no available option to hold 

8 aliens in detention; and 

9 (3) the Secretary of Homeland Security has ex10 ercised and exhausted all reasonable efforts to hold 

11 aliens in detention. 

12 SEC. 3. GPS TRACKING AND CURFEW REQUIREMENTS FOR 

13 CERTAIN ALIENS. 

14 Each alien on U.S. Immigration and Customs En15 forcement’s nondetained docket shall be— 

16 (1) enrolled in the Alternatives to Detention 

17 program; 

18 (2) continuously subject to GPS monitoring— 

19 (A) for the duration of all applicable immi20 gration proceedings, including any appeal; and 

21 (B) in the case of an alien who is ordered 

22 removed from the United States, until removal; 

23 and 

24 (3) required to stay in their Alternatives to De25 tention-compliant home address between the hours 

26 of 10:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4689 IS

1 SEC. 4. REMOVAL OF ALIENS WHO FAIL TO COMPLY WITH 

2 RELEASE ORDER. 

3 Section 240(b)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a(b)(5)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(F) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RELEASE

7 ORDER.—If an immigration officer submits an 

8 affidavit to an immigration judge stating that 

9 an alien failed to comply with a condition of re10 lease under section 236(a), such alien shall be 

11 ordered removed in absentia.’’. 

12 SEC. 5. SEVERABILITY. 

13 If any provision of this Act or the application of such 

14 provision to any person or circumstance is held by a Fed15 eral court to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act 

16 and the application of such provisions to any other person 

17 or circumstance shall not be affected. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB