alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Navarro, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 954]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered on or about May 13, 1993, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. *211Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

EDUARDO ALVARADO §

CHAVERRI, et al. §

§ No. 642 , 201 3

Plaintiffs

- Below

, §

Appellant s

, § Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware in and

v. § for New Castle County

§

DOLE FOOD COMPANY

, §

INC., et. al. § C.A. No. N12 C

- 06

- 017 ALR

§

Defendants

- Below

, §

Appellee s

. §

Submitted: October 15 , 2014

Decided: October 20, 2014

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice ; HOLLAND

, RIDGELY

, and

VALIHURA

, Justices ; and RYAN , Judge, constituting the Court en Banc

.

O R D E R

This 20 th day of October 2014, the Court, after hearing oral argument

and upon consideration of the record in this case, has concluded that this

appeal should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the

Superior Court in its Opinion and Order of November 8, 2013;

Sitting by designation under Del. Const. art. IV, § 12.NOW, THEREFORE , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment

of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Lawrence Schaffer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Case Financial, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers' and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


                                        /s/ Lawrence Schaffer
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lawrence Schaffer
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        January 11, 2007
---

---

Exhibit 14.(a).1

|
|
|

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-14222) of
Partner Communications Company Ltd. , of our report dated May 5, 2008, relating to the
financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appears in this Form 20-F.

|                 |                                    
|---------------- | -----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Tel-Aviv, Israel | Kesselman & Kesselman              
|May 5, 2008      | Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)



---

---
Order entered March 10, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 19
- 00197
- CV
IN TH E INTEREST OF V.I.P. M., A CHILD On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 13
- 02616

ORDER
T he clerk’s record was filed February 15, 2019, and supplemented on May 15, 2019. Missing from the record are a) all documents reflected in the docket as filed on or after March 7, 2018 and before April 3, 2018; b) the citation issued on November 21, 2017 reflecting service on appellant on December 14, 2017; and, c) two notices, one filed by the Attorney General and one filed by appellant, both on November 21, 2017. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 34.5(a)(1).
We ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file a second supplemental clerk’s record containing the documents identified above WITHINTEN DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 10052 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:16

- cr - 00127

- ACC

- TBS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus ERIC JASON HENDERSON, a.k.a. Feezy, Defendant

- Appellant.

___ _____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (August 9, 2017) Before ED CARNES , Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and WILLIAM PRYOR , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 17-10052 Date Filed: 08/09/2017 Page: 1 of 22 Jenny L. Devine, appointed counsel for E ric Henderson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s as sessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Henderson’s conviction s and sentence s are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 17-10052 Date Filed: 08/09/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Kimball International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert F. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:August 29, 2011/s/ ROBERT F. SCHNEIDERROBERT F. SCHNEIDERExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certifications Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersigned officers of Witness Systems, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge and belief that theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedDecember 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: March  16, 2006 |     |   |                                                 |   |
|------------------------|----------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |     |   |                                                 |   |
|                   |     |   |                                                 |   |
|                   |     | BY:    | /S/ DAVID B. GOULD                                   |   |   |
|                   |     |   |                                                 |   |   |
|                   |     |   |                                                 |   |   |
|                   |     |   | David B. Gould                                       |   |   |
| * *               | * * |   | *Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer* |   |   |
|                        |          |        |                                                      |        |  |  |

 

 
| Dated: March  16, 2006 |   |   |                      |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                   |   |   |                      |   |
|                   |   |   |                      |   |
|                   |   | BY:    | /S/ WILLIAM F. EVANS      |   |   |
|                   |   |   |                      |   |   |
|                   |   |   |                      |   |   |
|                   |   |   | William F. Evans          |   |   |
|                   |   |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |   |   |
|                        |        |        |                           |        |  |  |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to WitnessSystems, Inc. and will be retained by Witness Systems, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Rev 0 (9/08) 

## Com **ments i**  **n Response to “**  **Final r**  **ule; r**  **equest for c**  **om ments**  **”**
**Docket: FAA** **- 20**  **12 -**  **1220 Directorate Identifier**  **2012 -**  **NM -**  **208 -** **AD** Comments have been received in response to : **“ Final rule; requ**  **est for comments,”** Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. (Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted. Once you have made your determination, please fill in the com menter(s) name(s) and check the appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, if necessary. Then **include your name and**  **the date**  in the spaces provided, and return it to the AD directorate focal. The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we re ceived from: The Boeing Company **(Please check on**  **e**

**)** These comments **have not** been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration or change of this AD. These comments **have** been found to contain information that warrants consideration of additional regulatory

action. 

### (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual **FAA -**  **IR -**  **M -**  **8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)**

______ Sherry

Vevea

_____ February 1, 2013

__ Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
(Reap. Dec. 9512)

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. Joseph Stein v. United States

Entry No. WHB 29964, etc.

(Decided September 25, 1959)

*Sharretts, Paley é Garter*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the annexed schedule and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects to the issues in the case of *United States*v. *Freedman & Slater, Inc.,*39 Cust. Ct. Reports 717, A.R.D. 77, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the entered values of the merchandise involved in the cases listed in the annexed schedule are equal to the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, packed ready for delivery, and that the foreign values of such or similar merchandise were no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise herein involved, and that such values were the entered values in each case.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONNELL KINNARD, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2472 FCD PAN P

vs.

DAVID RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 28, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02472-FCD-PAN Document 13 Filed 04/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 28, 2006, are adopted in

full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED:April 17, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02472-FCD-PAN Document 13 Filed 04/17/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHANCELLOR WADE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1711 GEB DAD P

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 / AD TESTIFICANDUM

Chancellor Wade, inmate # P-25499, a necessary party for the trial confirmation

hearing on March 12, 2010, is confined in Folsom State Prison, Represa, California, in the

custody of the Warden; in order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary that a Writ of

Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate in

Court, 13 Floor, Courtroom 10, United States Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California th

on March 12, 2010, at 2:30 p.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above so that he may be present for the

trial confirmation hearing in United States District Court at the time and place above, and until

completion of court proceedings or as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to

the above institution; 

2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this

inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order and

writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum on the Out-To-Court Desk, California State Prison -

Sacramento, P.O. Box 290007, Represa, California 95671.

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden James Walker, Folsom State Prison, Prison Road, P.O. Box 290002, Represa,

California, 95671-002:

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to be present before

the United States District Court at the time and place above, and until completion of the

proceedings or as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above

institution.

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody

of the inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.

DATED: February 25, 2010.

DAD:md/4

wade1711.841

Case 2:04-cv-01711-GEB-DAD Document 96 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 1
No. 46699.

#### Protest 808984-G of Cambosco Scientific Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the aneroid barometers and hygrometers are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Selsi*v. *United States*(2 Cust. Ct. 371, C. D. 160) the claim at *27 1/2*percent under paragraph 372 was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-321-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

March 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 1, 2007, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin) tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff Second Revised Volume No. 1, Seventh Revised Sheet No. 
724, to be effective March 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eea8abbcada1808287808bbd9b9e9e819c9aae888b9c8dc0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7f1f2e5f4f8d9dbded9d2e4c2c7c7d8c5c3f7d1d2c5d499d0d8c1">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4355 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 7

CERTIFICATION

pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Sun Life Financial Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31,
2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his respective knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 13, 2014



/s/ Dean A. ConnorDean A. ConnorPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: February 13, 2014



/S/ Colm J. FreyneColm J. FreyneExecutive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer


This certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed to have been, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
December 19, 1939

No. 42906.

#### Protests 945392-G, etc., of Sheffler Merchandise Co. Inc.

Abstract 42597. Application by plaintiff for rehearing granted.