alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-616.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

FISHERIES 

Pacific Salmon 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CANADA 

Amending Annex IV to the 

Treaty of January 28, 1985, as 

Amended 

Signed at Ottawa June 16, 2006 

with 

Appendix 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CANADA 

Fisheries: Pacific Salmon 

 Agreement amending Annex IV of 

 the treaty of January 28, 1985, as amended. 

 Signed at Ottawa June 16, 2006; 

 Entered into force June 16, 2006. 

 With appendix.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter  Ended  August 31, 2005 (the  "Report") by
Advanced Media Training, Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.




October 11, 2005                        By:      /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                                 -----------------
                                                 Buddy Young
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P. (the
Partnership) for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don R. Wellendorf, Chief Executive Officer of Magellan Midstream Holdings GP,
LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/s/ Don R. Wellendorf                     
|Don R. Wellendorf, Chief Executive Officer
|Date: August 6, 2007                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership
and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 52007BP0125(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007BP0125(01)

**1. European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2005 (C6-0399/2006 - 2006/2166(DEC)) **

*
Official Journal 074 E , 20/03/2008 P. 0256 - 0256 *

1.

European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2005 (C6-0399/2006 — 2006/2166(DEC))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2005 [1],

- having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the final annual accounts of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2005, together with the Authority's replies [2],

- having regard to the Council's recommendation of 27 February 2007 (5711/2007 — C6-0080/2007),

- having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 276 thereof,

- having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [3], and in particular Article 185 thereof,

- having regard to (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety [4], and in particular Article 44 thereof,

- having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [5], and in particular Article 94 thereof,

- having regard to Rule 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0112/2007),

1. Grants the executive director of the European Food Safety Authority discharge for the implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 2005;

2. Sets out its observations in the resolution below;

3. Instructs its President to forward this decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the executive director of the European Food Safety Authority, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

[1] OJ C 266, 31.10.2006, p. 22.

[2] OJ C 312, 19.12.2006, p. 42.

[3] OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

[4] OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 575/2006 (OJ L 100, 8.4.2006, p. 3).

[5] OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11013-11014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-176-129]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Negotiated 
Rate

March 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 28, 2007, Natural Gas Pipeline Company 
of America (Natural) tendered for filing an amendment to five (5) 
Transportation Rate Schedule FTS Agreements currently on file with the 
Commission, to be effective March 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#591f1c0b1a16373530373c0a2c2929362b2d193f3c2b3a773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e484b5c4d41606267606b5d7b7e7e617c7a4e686b7c6d20696178">[email protected]</span></a>, or call

[[Page 11014]]

(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4361 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UPS Tracking Number: 

September 16, 2009 

Mr. Ross Bell 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

Shasta County Air Quality Management District 

1855 Placer Street 

Redding, CA 96001 

Director, Air Division (Attn: AIR-5) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

Re: 2009 Operating Permit Compliance Re-Test Results for Furnace Line #641 

Dear Mr. Ross Bell and Director, Air Division, 

Please find attached one copy of the compliance tests results for Knauf Insulation furnace 

#641. The Avogadro Group performed the tests on August 6, 2009. 

Our allowable emission limits and tested emission rates in pounds per hour are as follows: 

Parameter Emission Rate (lb / hr) 

Furnace Stack Furnace Allowable 

Total Particulate 1 0.137 0.67 Total Particulate 2 0.138 

Method 5/202 

2 Method 5/0TM28 

The process data collected during the individual tests with regard to the production rate and 

opacity readings from the furnace stack is on file at the Shasta Lake facility. 

Knauf Insulation GmbH, One Knauf Drive, Shelbyville, IN 46176 

Telephone (317) 398-4434, Fax (317) 398-3675, www.KnaufInsulation.com 
If there are any questions, please contact me at your convenience at 1-800-825-4434 ext. 8408 

or steve.aldridcle@us.knaufinsulation.com . 

Respectfully submitted, 

I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my 

direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel 

properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or 

persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the 

information, the information submitted is, to the best of knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and 

complete. I am aware that are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the 

possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 

Stephen R. Aldri.e 

Knauf Insulation, Manager Environmental Health and Safety 

Cc: lain James, Director Plant Operations, Shasta Lake, California 

Enclosures: 

2009 Particulate Matter Emissions Source Test Report — Hard Copy EPA 

2009 Particulate Matter Emissions Source Test Report — CD AQMD 

Confidential Business Information Packet — EPA and AQMD 

Knauf Insulation GmbH, One Knauf Drive, Shelbyville, IN 46176 

Telephone (317) 398-4434, Fax (317) 398-3675, www.KnaufInsulation.com
No. 42897.

#### Protest 197759-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Normandy laces similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) and lace articles like those passed upon in *United States*v. *Smith*(12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
ex10-08.htm


Exhibit 10.08

 

 



 

 

 

December 11, 2014

 

 

 

Robert Dykes 

  

Dear Bob,

 

This letter confirms our earlier discussions and will be used to memorialize our agreement. Effective as of December 11, 2014, you are hereby resigning from the Board of Directors of ReachLocal, Inc. (the “Company”). During the period from December 11, 2014 through September 30, 2015 (the “Consulting Period”), you have agreed to be available to provide consulting services as an independent contractor to the Company primarily advising the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer on strategic matters (the “Consulting Services”). The Consulting Services will not, in any event, exceed 10 hours per month. As consideration for the Consulting Services, the stock option granted to you by the Company on May 30, 2014 shall remain outstanding and continue to vest in accordance with the terms of the applicable option agreement until the conclusion of the Consulting Period or, if earlier, until the termination of your Consulting Services for any reason. All other options granted to you by the Company remain outstanding based on your Consulting Services. Upon the termination of the Consulting Services, you will have three months to exercise your options (which are set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto) in accordance with the terms of the applicable option agreements and the Company’s Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

Please confirm your agreement with the foregoing where indicated below.

 

 

 

 


	
 
	
Very truly yours,

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
ReachLocal, Inc.

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By: /s/ Sharon Rowlands                                         

	 	  Sharon Rowlands, CEO



 

AGREED

 

/s/ Robert Dykes                                        

Robert Dykes

December 11, 2014

 


 

 




 


 

	
Grant Date
	
# of Shares
	
Exercise Price ($)

	
February 20, 2008
	
75,000
	
10.91

	
June 15, 2011
	
11,209
	
17.32

	
May 22, 2012
	
31,402
	
9.00

	
May 22, 2013
	
19,360
	
14.61

	
May 30, 2014
	
43,988
	
6.68
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, the Chief Executive Officer, of Witness Systems, Inc. (the "registrant"), certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of the registrant;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:



|Dated: July 30, 2004 |  |     |                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | BY: | /s/DAVID B. GOULDDavid B. Gould Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In the Matter of the No. 52011-7-II

Post-Sentence Petition of

MARCUS ALAN CHURCH,

Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

MAXA, C.J. — The Department of Corrections (DOC) petitioned this court under RCW 

9.94A.585(7) to review the sentence imposed by the trial court in State v. Marcus Alan Church, 

Lewis County Superior Court Cause No. 17-1-00650-21. 

In its judgment and sentence, the trial court imposed 36 months of community custody as 

part of Church’s sentence for attempted failure to register as a sex offender. DOC asserts that 

attempted failure to register as a sex offender is not a sex offense for which community custody 

can be imposed under RCW 9.94A.702(1). 

In Postsentence Review of Thompson, we held that DOC is correct and that attempted 

failure to register as a sex offender does not qualify for the imposition of community custody. 6 

Wn. App. 2d 64, 73, 429 P.3d 545 (2018). Accordingly, we grant DOC’s petition and remand 

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

February 13, 2019
No. 52011-7-II

2

Church’s judgment and sentence to the superior court to strike the imposition of community 

custody.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 

2.06.040, it is so ordered.

MAXA, C.J.

We concur:

WORSWICK, J.

MELNICK, J.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Annunziata and Senior Judge Hodges 

Argued at Norfolk, Virginia 

GREGORY WIGGINS 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0846-95-1 BY JUDGE JOSEPH E. BAKER 

 APRIL 9, 1996 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ACCOMACK COUNTY 

Glen A. Tyler, Judge 

 Thomas L. Northam (Vincent, Northam & Lewis, 

on brief), for appellant. 

 Monica S. McElyea, Assistant Attorney General 

(James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on 

brief), for appellee. 

 In this appeal by Gregory Wiggins (appellant) from his bench 

trial conviction by the Circuit Court of Accomack County (trial 

court), the sole issue presented is whether the evidence is 

sufficient to support appellant's conviction of attempted 

robbery. We have examined the record in this case and find that 

the evidence is sufficient to support his conviction. 

 As the parties are conversant with the facts, we recite only 

those necessary to an understanding of this opinion and view the 

facts in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting 

to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom. 

Higginbotham v. Commonwealth, 216 Va. 349, 352, 218 S.E.2d 534, 

537 (1975). 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

 Appellant told the police that he initially intended to 

purchase $40 worth of drugs from the victim, but, as the purchase 

was in progress, the victim grabbed the $40 and ran away. 

Appellant further told the police that he then decided that since 

the victim "was robbing me for my money, I may as well rob him 

for his cocaine and money." As the victim ran from the scene, 

appellant shot him in the leg. 

 Robbery is not defined by statute in Virginia but, rather, 

is a common law crime. The common law defines robbery as "the 

taking, with intent to steal, of the personal property of 

another, from his person or in his presence, against his will, by 

violence or intimidation." Mason v. Commonwealth, 200 Va. 253, 

254, 105 S.E.2d 149, 150 (1958). An attempt is an "unfinished 

crime . . . composed of . . . the intent to commit the crime and 

the doing of some direct act toward its consummation, but falling 

short of the accomplishment of the ultimate design." Johnson v. 

Commonwealth, 209 Va. 291, 293, 163 S.E.2d 570, 573 (1968). 

 We hold that the evidence is sufficient to support the 

judgment of the trial court and, accordingly, that judgment is 

affirmed. 

Affirmed.
Vista International Technologies, Inc. - 10K/A





Exhibit 32
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Vista International Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 for the period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: June 24, 2011
By:
/s/ Bradley A. RippsBradley A. RippsInterim Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer and principal

financial and accounting officer)
Before the Second Division,

July 9, 1943

No. 48528.

#### Protest 68568-K of Katz Berk Hat Body Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain of the merchandise consists of hats and hoods composed of ramie and cellophane, similar to those involved in Abstract 47291, and in accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Plaintiff filed a request for an extension on April 21, 2005, well after the deadline for 1

filing objections had passed. The request makes reference to additional evidence but does not

indicate that plaintiff intends to file objections or an amended complaint in compliance with the

February 15, 2005 findings and recommendations. Plaintiff’s request for an extension is denied.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVE R. WOLFF,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2385 DFL GGH P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 15, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff was re-served

with this document on April 27, 2005, to his current address. Plaintiff has not filed objections to

the findings and recommendations.

1

Case 2:04-cv-02385-DFL-GGH Document 16 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 15, 2005, are adopted in

full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED: 6/23/2005 

 /s/ David F. Levi 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/wolf2385.800

Case 2:04-cv-02385-DFL-GGH Document 16 Filed 06/24/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 65521.

#### Richard S. Reade *v.*United States,

protests 60/23207 and 60/23208 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protests were dismissed.