alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 10358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4112]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-07-014]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Connecticut River, East Haddam, 
CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a 
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the 
Route 82 Bridge across the Connecticut River, mile 16.8, at East 
Haddam, Connecticut. Under this temporary deviation, the bridge may 
remain in the closed position for two nights from 8:30 p.m. to 4:30 
a.m. between March 19, 2007 and March 23, 2007. The exact two closure 
dates will be determined based upon favorable weather necessary to 
perform the scheduled repairs. This deviation is necessary to 
facilitate scheduled bridge maintenance.

DATES: This deviation is effective from March 19, 2007 through March 
23, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this document are available for 
inspection or copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch 
Office, One South Street, New York, New York 10004, between 7 a.m. and 
3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone 
number is (212) 668-7165. The First Coast Guard District Bridge Branch 
Office maintains the public docket for this temporary deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First 
Coast Guard District, at (212) 668-7195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Route 82 Bridge, across the Connecticut 
River, mile 16.8, at East Haddam, Connecticut, has a vertical clearance 
in the closed position of 22 feet at mean high water and 25 feet at 
mean low water. The existing drawbridge operation regulations are 
listed at 33 CFR 117.205(c).
    The owner of the bridge, Connecticut Department of Transportation, 
requested a temporary deviation to facilitate scheduled bridge 
maintenance, drive gear repairs. The bridge will not be able to open 
while the bridge maintenance is underway.
    Under this temporary deviation the Route 82 Bridge may remain in 
the closed position between 8:30 p.m. and 4:30 a.m., for two nights, 
between March 19, 2007 and March 23, 2007. The exact two closure dates 
will be selected depending upon favorable weather necessary to perform 
the required repairs.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed 
with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as 
soon as possible.
    This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 
33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: February 26, 2007.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7-4112 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel Sheng, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:              
      February 14, 2011
              By:
              /s/ Samuel ShengSamuel
      Sheng
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                (principal
      financial and accounting
officer)
#### Ronald E. Ziolkowski, Plaintiff, v Bahman Golden Homes, Inc., Respondent, and Stockmohr Company, Inc., Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 578]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Gorski, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gorski, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Davis, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2509 MCE KJM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Defendants. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil

rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

The court takes judicial notice under Federal Rule of Evidence 201 of the motion

to dismiss filed in Miller v. Kuhn, CIV S 03-1270 FCD PAN P. It appears that plaintiff has

“struck out” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and therefore may not proceed in forma pauperis. See

Mot. To Dismiss (CIV S 03-1270, docket # 15), Exs. B, C, D & E. Good cause appearing, the

court will order plaintiff to show cause why he should not be ordered to pay the $150.00 filing

fee in effect at the time of filing of this action before proceeding further. 

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02509-MCE -KJM Document 9 Filed 10/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty days of this order,

plaintiff shall show cause why he should not be required to pay the $150.00 filing fee for this

action before proceeding. Plaintiff’s failure to respond to this order will result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

DATED: October 19, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

mill2509.1915(g)

Case 2:04-cv-02509-MCE -KJM Document 9 Filed 10/20/05 Page 2 of 2
Case No. 7,916.

#### KNOX v. WALTON et al.

[2 Wash. C. C. 507.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

Jan., 1811.

Referee's Report — Plain and Palpable Mistake.

A report of referees, made under an order of court, set aside, because of a plain and palpable mistake as to matters of fact, appearing by the evidence of the referees.

In this case [Knox against Walton and Caman], which came on upon exceptions to the report of referees under an order of the court, the report was set aside, upon the ground of a plain and palpable mistake of the referees as to matters of fact. The mistake appeared by the examination of the referees themselves.

1

 [Originally published from the MSS. of Hon. Bushrod Washington, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard Peters. Jr., Esq.]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41468

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JESUS PADILLA-GOMEZ, also known as, Armando Martinez-Vasquez also known as, Jesus Padilla Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-00409-ALL SCOTUS No. 06-7871 On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * This case is on remand from the United States Supreme Court, which vacated our judgment, see United States v. Padilla-Gomez, 203 F. App’x 597 (5th Cir. 2006), and remanded the case to us for further consideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzales, 127 S. Ct. 625 (2006). S ee Ochoa-Perez v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 1263 (2007). United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D March 25, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 05-41468

1 Padilla-Gomez was convicted of three state felony drug offenses, first on August 23, 1994, second on August 9, 2000, and third on October 3, 2002. PSR, ¶¶ 21, 28, 30. -2- Padilla-Gomez pleaded guilty to the crime of illegally reentering the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Padilla-Gomez’s conviction is AFFIRMED; Padilla-Gomez’s sentence is VACATED and REMANDED to the district court for resentencing in accordance with Lopez

. We express no opinion on the issue ofwhether the § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) enhancement was appropriate because Padilla-Gomez’s 2000 and 2002 possession offenses qualified as “recidivist po ssession.” 1 S ee Lopez, 127 S. Ct. at 630 n. 6; United States v. Sanchez-Villalobos, 412 F.3d 572, 576-77 (5th Cir. 2005). * * * THE CLERK IS INSTRUCTED TO ISSUE THE MA NDATE FORTHWITH.
No. 50489.

#### Protests 748071-G, etc., of Steel Union, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11941-11942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4598]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Assistance (VITA) Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel VITA Issue 
Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting 
public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at 
the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 3, 2007, at noon Eastern 
Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Toy at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(414) 231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel VITA Issue Committee will 
be held Tuesday, April 3, 2007, at noon, Eastern Time via a telephone

[[Page 11942]]

conference call. You can submit written comments to the Panel by faxing 
to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, 
P.O. Box 3205, Milwaukee, WI 53201-3205, or you can contact us at 
http://www.improveirs.org. Public comments will also be welcome during 
the meeting. Please contact Barbara Toy at 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-
2360 for additional information.
    The agenda will include the following: Various VITA Issues.

    Dated: March 7, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E7-4598 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, James Tilton, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that the annual report on Form 10-K of Savanna East Africa, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Savanna East Africa, Inc.  Dated: October 25, 2010By:/s/ James TiltonJames TiltonChief Operating Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
No. *65543.*

#### A. *&*A. Food Products and Chas. H. Asche & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/24897, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

May 14, 1948

No. 52323.

protests 75477-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Saji Trading Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of small figures similar íd all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Okuda*(23 C. C. P. A. 46, T. D. 47713) and Abstract-47064 the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 205 (e) was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11345-11346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-130-001]


Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

March 7, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 6, 2007, Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, 
LLC (Mississippi Canyon) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to 
become effective April 5, 2007:

First Revised Sheet No. 16
Third Revised Sheet No. 22
Second Revised Sheet No. 259
First Revised Sheet No. 260
First Revised Sheet No. 299

    Mississippi Canyon states that it is filing these tariff sheets in 
order to remove the minimum reserve commitment requirement and the 
minimum Maximum Daily Quantity requirement for Rate Schedule FT-2

[[Page 11346]]

service from its tariff, in order to comply with the Commission's 
February 9, 2007 Letter Order, 118 FERC ] 61,090 (2007), issued in this 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c4a495e4f4362606562695f797c7c637e784c6a697e6f226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0e6e5f2e3efceccc9cec5f3d5d0d0cfd2d4e0c6c5d2c38ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4485 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
2014.12.31 - 10K EX 10.8






December 31, 2014


Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear John:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated December 31, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2015.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgement and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.
	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ John C. Wayne
	 

	John C. Wayne
No. 47391.

#### Protests 76707-K, etc., of American Merchandise Co., Inc.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVELLOUS A. GREENE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2383 FCD DAD P

vs.

D. PONTAROLO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 20, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-02383-FCD-DAD Document 10 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 20, 2005, are adopted in

full; 

2. Plaintiff’s federal claims are dismissed without leave to amend;

3. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s state

law claims; and 

4. This action is dismissed for failure to state a federal claim upon which relief

may be granted.

DATED:January 23, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02383-FCD-DAD Document 10 Filed 01/24/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT TO OPTION


 


This Amendment (this “Amendment”)
to the Option, issued _____________, 2016, by EVINE Live Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), to _______________
(the “Holder”), is made and entered into as of _______, 2016, by and between the Company and the Holder. Capitalized
terms used but not defined in this Amendment will have the meanings ascribed to them in the Option. The Company has previously
issued the Option to the Holder, and each of the Company and the Holder desire to amend the Option to clarify certain pricing terms
therein.


Amendment


 


Now,
Therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.           Introductory
Paragraph 3 of the Option is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


 


Upon exercise of this Option, two-thirds
(2/3) of the Option Securities shall be issued in the form of Common Stock, and one-third (1/3) of the Option Securities shall
be issued in the form of the Option Warrant substantially in the form of the Warrant; provided, however, that the Exercise Price
of the Option Warrant shall be a price per share equal to a 50% premium to the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock
on the Trading Market on the Trading Day prior to the announcement of the exercise of the Option.


 


2.           This
Amendment is effective upon the full execution hereof. Other than as set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions
of the Option will continue in full force and effect. This Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with governing
laws as set forth in the Option and any other amendments thereto. This Amendment may be executed and delivered in one or more counterparts
(including PDF, facsimile and other electronic counterparts), each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together
will constitute one and the same agreement.


 


In
Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Option of the date first above written.


 


	 	EVINE LIVE, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	         	 
	 	Name:

Title:	Robert Rosenblatt
Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	HOLDER	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	 	 
	 	Name:
TELEPHONE CONTACT SUMMARY

Brick and Structural Clay Products

FROM: Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

DATE OF CONTACT: May 14, 2015

ORGANIZATION CONTACTED: 

The Brick Industry Association

PERSON CONTACTED: 

Susan Miller

919-380-2191

PURPOSE OF CONTACT:

To obtain facility contact information for obtaining additional information regarding green brick

mercury testing results.

SUMMARY OF CONTACT: 

The Brick Industry Association (BIA) provided the EPA with a spreadsheet of mercury green 

brick testing results with the intent to add a mercury raw material variability factor to the 

Mercury MACT floor limit. In order to incorporate this raw material data, the EPA needed to 

know a little bit more about the general location of the clay deposits being used by the facilities:

-What is the clay deposit name being used by the facility?

-What is the geological age of the deposit? 

-Is the location of the facility approximately the same location as the deposit?

Ms. Miller provided facility contact information for the Bowerston Shale Company and GlenGery Corporation facilities.

.
---

---

Exhibit 4.(a).43

[FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY, NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSLATION]

[State Emblem]

# The State of IsraelMinistry
of Communications

General
License for Partner Communications Ltd. for the Provision of Mobile Radio Telephone
(MRT) Services using the Cellular Method

# Amendment No. 28

By virtue of the powers of the
Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the Communications Law
(Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, that have been delegated to us, by all our
other powers under any law and after having considered the arguments of Partner
Communications Company Ltd. (hereinafter- Partner) we hereby amend the General
License for the provision of mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the cellular
method granted to Partner on 7 April 1998, as follows:

# Amendment of Article 21

| | 1. | In
Article 21.8, instead of 51%", shall come 30%".
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------

November 30, 2004

|/s/ Uri Olenik
Uri Olenik, Adv.Director-GeneralMinistry of Communications | /s/ Haim Giron
Haim Giron, Adv.Senior Deputy Director-General,Engineering and Licensing, Ministry ofCommunications
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---