This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

936 

Vol. 72, No. 5 

Tuesday, January 9, 2007 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–485–803] 

Notice of Extension of Final Results of 

the 2004–2005 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Certain Cutto-Length Carbon Steel Plate From 

Romania 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 9, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dena Crossland or John Drury, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3362 or (202) 482– 

0195, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 11, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published the preliminary 

results of this administrative review of 

certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate 

(‘‘cut-to-length plate’’) from Romania. 

See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel 

Plate from Romania: Preliminary 

Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Partial 

Rescission, 71 FR 53377 (September 11, 

2006) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). In the 

Preliminary Results we stated that we 

would make our final determination for 

the antidumping duty review no later 

than 120 days after the date of 

publication of the preliminary results 

(i.e., January 9, 2007). 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

The Department is extending the time 

limit for the final results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on cut-to-length 

plate from Romania. This review covers 

the period August 1, 2004, through July 

31, 2005. 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), states 

that if it is not practicable to complete 

the review within the time specified, the 

administering authority may extend the 

120-day period, following the date of 

publication of the preliminary results, to 

issue its final results by an additional 60 

days. Due to the complexity of issues 

raised in this review segment, including 

the selection of date of sale for 

respondent’s U.S. sales and the 

calculation of inland freight to port 

expenses, the completion of the final 

results within the 120-day period is not 

practicable. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department 

is extending the time period for issuing 

the final results of review by an 

additional 30 days until no later than 

February 8, 2007. 

Dated: December 28, 2006. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–55 Filed 1–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–848] 

Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative and New Shipper 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 9, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin 

C. Begnal or Scot Fullerton, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1442 or (202) 482– 

1386, respectively. 

Background 

On October 10, 2006, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

the preliminary results of the 

administrative and new shipper reviews 

of the antidumping duty order on 

freshwater crawfish tail meat from the 

People’s Republic of China for the 

period September 1, 2004, through 

August 31, 2005. See Freshwater 

Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

and Partial Rescission of the 2004/2005 

Administrative and New Shipper 

Reviews, 71 FR 59432 (October 10, 

2006) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). The final 

results of these reviews are currently 

due by February 7, 2007. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), and section 351.213(h)(1) of the 

Department’s regulations, the 

Department shall issue final results in 

an administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 120 

days after the date on which the notice 

of preliminary results is published in 

the Federal Register. However, if the 

Department determines that it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within the specified time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend this time period 

to 180 days. 

The Department has determined that 

completion of the final results of the 

aligned administrative and new shipper 

reviews within the 120-day period is 

impracticable. The Department requires 

additional time to address the concerns 

of the interested parties as raised in 

their November 9, 2006, case briefs, and 

November 14, 2006, rebuttal briefs. 

Therefore, the Department is fully 

extending the time limit for completion 

of these final results to April 8, 2007, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act. However, because April 8, 

2007, falls on a Sunday, the final results 

will be due no later than, April 9, 2007, 

the next business day. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 


ycherry on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 9, 2007 / Notices 937 

Dated: December 27, 2006. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–44 Filed 1–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–891] 

Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China; 

Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Administrative Review 

and Preliminary Results of New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review and a new 

shipper review of the antidumping duty 

order on hand trucks and certain parts 

thereof (hand trucks) from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC) covering the 

period December 1, 2004, through 

November 30, 2005. We have 

preliminarily determined that sales have 

been made below normal value (NV). If 

these preliminary results are adopted in 

the final results of these reviews, we 

will instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

We will issue the final results no later 

than 120 days from the date of 

publication of this notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 9, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood or Nichole Zink, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3874 or (202) 482–

0049, respectively. 

Background 

On December 1, 2005, the Department 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on hand trucks 

from the PRC. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 70 

FR 72109 (Dec. 1, 2005). 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.214(c), on December 27, 2005, the 

Department received a request to 

conduct both an administrative review 

and a new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order from Since 

Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. (Since 

Hardware), a producer/exporter of 

subject merchandise in the PRC. 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b)(1), on December 30, 2005, 

the petitioners, Gleason Industrial 

Products, Inc. and Precision Products, 

Inc., requested that the Department 

conduct an administrative review for 

the following producers and/or 

exporters of the subject merchandise: 

Qingdao Huatian Hand Truck Co., Ltd. 

(Huatian); Qingdao Future Tool, Inc. 

(Future Tool); Qingdao Taifa Group Co. 

Ltd./Qindao Yinzhu Hang Truck Factory 

(collectively, ‘‘Taifa’’); True Potential 

Co., Ltd. (True Potential); and Shandong 

Machinery I&E Group Corp. (Shandong 

Machinery). Also on December 30, 2005, 

the Department received a request to 

conduct an administrative review from 

Aulita Quindao Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

(Aulita), a producer/exporter of the 

subject merchandise, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(2). 

On January 3, 2006, Clipper Products, 

Inc., a U.S. importer of the subject 

merchandise, requested that the 

Department conduct an administrative 

review of Forecarry Corp. (Forecarry), 

an exporter of subject merchandise 

located in a third country, and its PRC 

supplier, Formost Plastics & Metalworks 

(Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. (Formost). 

On February 1, 2006, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of the initiation of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of hand trucks from the PRC for the 

period May 24, 2004, through November 

30, 2005. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 71 FR 5241 (Feb. 1, 2006). On 

February 3, 2006, the Department also 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of the initiation of the new 

shipper review of Since Hardware. See 

Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation of New Shipper Review, 71 FR 

5810 (Feb. 3, 2006). 

On February 8, 2006, we issued a new 

shipper questionnaire to Since 

Hardware. We received Since 

Hardware’s response to Section A of this 

questionnaire on February 23, 2006. 

In February 2006 we issued quantity 

and value questionnaires to Aulita, 

Forecarry, Formost, Future Tool, 

Huatian, Shandong Machinery, True 

Potential, and Taifa. We received 

responses to these questionnaires 

between February 22 and March 3, 

2006, from all companies except Aulita 

and Shandong Machinery. 

On February 13, 2006, Since 

Hardware stated that it did not object to 

a rescission of its requested 

administrative review, so long as its sale 

was examined in the context of the new 

shipper review. See the ‘‘Partial 

Rescission of Administrative Review’’

section of this notice, below, for further 

discussion. 

On February 15, 2006, we issued 

letters to all parties in both the 

administrative review and the new 

shipper review informing them of the 

correct period of review (POR). The POR 

for this segment of the proceeding is 

December 1, 2004, through November 

30, 2005. On February 24, 2006, we 

published in the Federal Register a 

correction to the POR for the 

administrative review. *See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 9519 

(Feb. 24, 2006). 

On February 28, 2006, Aulita 

withdrew its request for an 

administrative review within the time 

limits specified under 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1). See the ‘‘Partial 

Rescission of Administrative Review’’

section of this notice, below, for further 

discussion. 

On March 3, 2006, we issued a letter 

to Shandong Machinery providing a 

second opportunity to respond to the 

Department’s request for quantity and 

value information. Shandong Machinery 

did not respond to the Department’s 

March 3, 2006, letter. See the ‘‘Facts 

Available’’ section of this notice, below, 

for further discussion. 

On March 17, 2006, the Department 

determined that it was not practicable to 

examine individually all of the 

companies covered by the 2004–2005 

administrative review, and thus it 

limited its examination to the largest 

producers/exporters that could 

reasonably be reviewed, pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). Therefore, 

on this date the Department selected 

Taifa as the sole respondent required to 

submit a full questionnaire response in 

the administrative review. See the 

March 17, 2006, memorandum from 

Irene Darzenta Tzafolias, Acting Office 

Director, to Stephen Claeys, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary, entitled 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Hand Trucks and Certain 

Parts Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Selection of 

Respondents.’’

On March 20, 2006, we issued the 

antidumping duty questionnaire to 

Taifa. Also on March 20, 2006, we 

issued a separate-rate questionnaire (i.e., 

section A of the antidumping duty 

questionnaire) to Future Tool, Huatian, 


ycherry on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES